alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Court of Appeals

of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A16A1431. AMOS SANDERS v. THE STATE.

In 2002, Amos Sanders entered guilty pleasin two cases. In case 02-CR-0272,

he pled guilty to one count of armed robbery and one count of possession of a firearm

during the commission of a crime, for which he was sentenced to twenty years plus

five years to run consecutively. In case 02-CR-0274, Sanders pled guilty to three

counts of armed robbery and one count of possession of a firearm during commission

of a crime, for which he was sentenced to twenty years for each of the three armed

robbery counts to run consecutively plus five years to run consecutively to the other

three sentences. The trial court indicated that the sentencesfrom02-CR-0272 and 02-

CR-0274 should run concurrently. Sanders subsequently filed a “Motion that

Sentence Reflect the Truth,” in which he asked the trial court to resentence him in

accordance with the plea agreement.

1 The trial court denied the motion, noting that

it followed the agreement between the State and Sanders. Sanders then filed this

appeal.

Under OCGA § 17-10-1 (f), a court may correct or reduce a sentence during

the year after its imposition or within 120 days after remittitur following a direct

appeal, whichever is later. See Frazier v. State, 302 Ga. App. 346, 347-348 (691

SE2d 247) (2010); Burg v. State, 297 Ga. App. 118, 118 (676 SE2d 465) (2009). 

Once this statutory period expires, a trial court may modify a sentence only if it is

1 Sanders contendsthat it was agreed that all armed robbery convictions would

run concurrently. This contention is belied by the transcript from the guilty plea

hearing.

April 20, 2016
void. See Jones v. State, 278 Ga. 669, 670 (604 SE2d 483) (2004). A sentence is

void if the court imposes punishment that the law does not allow. Id. Therefore, in

order to support a motion for sentence modification filed outside the statutory time

period of OCGA § 17-10-1 (f), a defendant must demonstrate that the sentence

imposes punishment not allowed by law. See Frazier, supra. Further, a direct appeal

does not lie from the denial of an untimely motion seeking to modify a sentence

unless the motion raises a colorable claim that the sentence is, in fact, void. See

Reynolds v. State, 272 Ga. App. 91, 95 (3) (611 SE2d 750) (2005). 

Sanders’s motion requesting modification was not timely under OCGA § 17-

10-1 (f). Nor does he allege that his sentence is void; rather, he claims that it did not

accurately reflect his plea agreement. Consequently, Sanders has not raised a valid

void sentence argument, and this appeal is therefore DISMISSED for lack of

jurisdiction.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________

I certify that the above is a true extract from

the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.

Witness my signature and the seal of said court

hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

04/20/2016
Before the Second Division,

April 29, 1968

No. P68/226.

protests 67/3017, etc. (Los Angeles).

#### Sinclair Paint Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Bao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of hanging paper similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Victor England*Agencies, *Inc.*v. *United States*(50 Cust. Ct. 83, C.D. 2394), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 62502.

#### A. Zerkowitz & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 327607-K (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

The protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
# attribtable--OUTPUT

&"Arial,Bold"&10IRC Handout Bulletin No. 2021-12	&"Arial,Bold"&9Draft	&"Arial,Bold"&10February 10, 2021
Case: 10-3698 Document: 003110488049 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/01/2011 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT 


10-3698 


Jayne Cubbage v. Bloomberg LP 


2-05-cv-02989 


ORDER 

In accordance with the agreement ofthe parties in the above-captioned case, the matter is hereby 

dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), without cost to either party. A certified copy of this 

order is issued in lieu of a formal mandate. 

For the Court, 

Pc~'Pt·V~ 

Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk 

Dated: April 1, 2011 

lsi pdb Case Manager 

cc: 


Thomas H. Golden Esq. 


1. Edward McCain III Esq. 

Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk 

Certified order issued in Jieu of mandate. 

Case 2:05-cv-02989-CDJ Document 64 Filed 04/01/11 Page 1 of 1
Credit Reform Case Studies Page 1 of 1 IRC Handout April 20, 2017

Credit Reform Case Study Update Project

Phase II document updates to the following:

 Guide for Basic Accounting and Reporting for Foreclosed Property in 

Federal Credit Programs Effective Fiscal Year 2017

 Guide for Basic Accounting and Reporting For Direct Loan Programs 

Without Collateral in Federal Credit Program Effective Fiscal Year 2017

Update accounting transactions: 

 Replace USSGL 579000 – Other Financing Sources with USSGL 579100 –

Adjustment to Financing Sources – Credit Reform

 When reporting USSGL 579100 agencies should use the Federal/Nonfederal 

attribute domain value of “F” .

Transaction Codes Created or Updated:

 Effective Fiscal 2017, affected Transaction Codes that include USSGL 

579100.

-A204 

-A206

-A208

-D149 

-D150

 Effective Fiscal 2017, affected Transaction Codes updated to include 

language clarifying their use in Credit Reform situations or to include 

USSGL accounts used in transactions presented in the case studies:

-A202

-B105

-C118

 -D147
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIAID Investigator Initiated Program Project Applications (P01 Clinical Trial Not Allowed).                              ( print page 77596)    

*Date:*                         December 15, 2023.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G42B, Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Louis A. Rosenthal, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities,  National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G42B, Rockville, MD 20852, (240) 669-5070,                         *rosenthalla@niaid.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: November 7, 2023.

David W. Freeman, 

Supervisory Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-24965 Filed 11-9-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Exhibit 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Merrill Lynch Preferred
Capital Trust IV (the "Trust") and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding IV, L.P. (the
"Partnership") for the period ended June 27, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ahmass L.
Fakahany, Regular Trustee of the Trust and Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., the General Partner of the
Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust
    and the Partnership.




                              MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST IV


                              By:  /s/ AHMASS L. FAKAHANY
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                              Name:    Ahmass L. Fakahany *
                              Title:   Regular Trustee




                               MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING IV, L.P.


                               By: MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC., as General Partner



                               By:  /s/ AHMASS L. FAKAHANY
                                    --------------------------------------------
                               Name:    Ahmass L. Fakahany *
                               Title:   Executive Vice President and
                                        Chief Financial Officer



Dated: August 7, 2003
_____________________

*  Ahmass L. Fakahany functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
   and Chief Financial Officer of each of the Trust and the Partnership for
   purposes of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
October 2 , 2014



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellant

NO. 14

- 14

- 00054

- CR V.

BRIAN WEI , Appellee

________________________________ This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED

. We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
EX-4.56



  

Exhibit 4.56

SUPPLEMENTARY AGREEMENT TO

EXCLUSIVE BUSINESS CONSULTANCY SERVICE AGREEMENT



This supplementary agreement (“Supplementary Agreement”) to the Exclusive Business Consultancy
Service Agreement is made on 1 April, 2007, in Shanghai, People’s Republic of China (“PRC”), by and
between:





	(1)	 	T2CN Information Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., located at 12F, 418, Gui Ping Road,
Shanghai, with Deng Ruen-Zeh as the legal representative (hereinafter called “T2CN”)
	 
	(2)	 	Shanghai T2 Entertainment Co., Ltd., located at 11F, 418, Gui Ping Road, Shanghai, with Wang
Chi as the legal representative (hereinafter called “T2E”).




(T2CN and T2E are hereinafter referred to individually as “Party” and collectively as “Parties”.)



Pursuant to the provisions of the Exclusive Business Consultancy Service Agreement made by the
Parties on 15 November 2006, the Parties hereby enter into this Supplementary Agreement as follows:



The Consultancy Service Fee that T2E shall pay T2CN on a quarterly basis for Q2, 3 and 4 of 2007 (1
April to 31 December, 2007) under Clause 3.1 and Clause 3.2 of the Exclusive Business Consultancy
Service Agreement, shall be calculated as follows: Amount of the Consultancy Service Fee = 20% of
T2E’s Operating Income



This Supplementary Agreement shall prevail in case of any inconsistency with the Exclusive Business
Consultancy Service Agreement.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	T2CN Information Technology


(Shanghai) Co., Ltd.	 	 	 	Shanghai T2 Entertainment Co., Ltd.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Signed by:

	 	/s/ Guo Jun Wei 	 	 	 	Signed by:	 	/s/ Ji Wang 	 	 
	 

	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Name:  Guo Jun Wei

	 	 	 	 	 	Name:  Ji Wang	 	 
	 	 	Title:     Authorized Representative	 	 	 	 	 	Title:     Authorized Representative
Part 2 DRAFT Fiscal Year 2020 Reporting 

SUPPLEMENT Section VII 

U.S. Standard General Ledger 

Closing Edits Detail Report 

Bulletin No. 2019-10 DRAFT VII CER - 1 IRC Handout 4/23/19

 

Closing Rule Number: 21.413900 

Closing USSGL Account: 413900 Contract Authority Carried Forward 

Calculated Preclosing Balance 413900 Beginning Balance 

USSGL Account 

Number Begin/End Indicator Authority Type Code 

USSGL Account 

Number Begin/End Indicator 

413100 E 413900 B 

413120 E 

413200 E S 

413300 E 

413400 E 

413500 E P/S 

413900 E 

439200 E C 

439300 E C 

 

Closing Rule Number: 21.414900 

Closing USSGL Account: 414900 Borrowing Authority Carried Forward 

Calculated Preclosing Balance 414900 Beginning Balance 

USSGL Account 

Number Begin/End Indicator Authority Type Code 

USSGL Account 

Number Begin/End Indicator 

414000 E P/S 414900 B 

414100 E 

414120 E 

414300 E 

414400 E 

414500 E 

414900 E 

439200 E B 

439300 E B 

 

Closing Rule Number: 45.320000 

Closing USSGL Account: 320000 Appropriations Outstanding - Cumulative 

320000 Preclosing Balance 320000 Beginning Balance 

USSGL Account 

Number Begin/End Indicator 

USSGL Account 

Number Begin/End Indicator 

320000 E 320000 B 

320100 E 

320110 E 

320600 E 

320700 E 

320800 E 

 
Part 2 DRAFT Fiscal Year 2020 Reporting 

SUPPLEMENT Section VII 

U.S. Standard General Ledger 

Closing Edits Detail Report 

Bulletin No. 2019-10 DRAFT VII CER - 2 IRC Handout 4/23/19

Closing Rule Number: 45.331000 

Closing USSGL Account: 331000 Cumulative Results of Operations 

331000 Preclosing Balance 331000 Beginning Balance 

USSGL Account 

Number Begin/End Indicator Reporting Type Code 

USSGL Account 

Number Begin/End Indicator 

331000 E E/F/U 331000 B 

510000 E E/F/U 

510900 E E/F/U 

520000 E E/U 

520900 E E/U 

531000 E E/U 

531100 E E/U 

531200 E E/U 

531300 E E/F/U 

531400 E E/F/U 

531500 E E/F/U 

531700 E E/U 

531800 E E/U 

531900 E E/U 

532000 E E/U 

532400 E E/U 

532500 E E/U 

532900 E E/U 

540000 E E/U 

540500 E U 

540600 E U 

540900 E E/U 

550000 E E/U 

550900 E E/U 

560000 E E/U 

560900 E E/U 

561000 E E/U 

561900 E E/U 

564000 E E/F/U 

564900 E E/F/U 

565000 E E/F/U 

565900 E E/F/U 

570000 E E/F/U 

570005 E U 

570500 E E/F/U 

570800 E E/F/U 

570810 E U 

570900 E E/F/U 

571000 E U 

571200 E U 

571300 E E/F/U 

572000 E E/F/U 

 E E/F/U
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 1SUPPLEMENT	&"Arial,Bold"DRAFT	&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2016 ReportingSection VII

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2016-05	&"Arial,Bold"DRAFT VII VSR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout 4/21/16
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

KRISTIN PEREZ HAINES : CIVIL ACTION

:

V. :

:

RODNEY GENE LEE and : NO: 02-CV-4432

NORTHSTAR TRUCKING SERVICES, INC. :

PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT’S 

AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES

FIRST AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE

Denied. As a conclusion of law to which no response or pleading is required.

SECOND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE

Denied. As a conclusion of law to which no response or pleading is required.

THIRD AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE

Denied. As a conclusion of law to which no response or pleading is required.

FOURTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE

Denied. As a conclusion of law to which no response or pleading is required.

FIFTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE

Denied. As a conclusion of law to which no response or pleading is required.

SIXTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE

Denied. As a conclusion of law to which no response or pleading is required.

SEVENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE

Denied. As a conclusion of law to which no response or pleading is required.

EIGHTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE

Denied. As a conclusion of law to which no response or pleading is required.

Case 2:02-cv-04432-BWK Document 7 Filed 09/18/2002 Page 1 of 2
NINTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE

Denied. As a conclusion of law to which no response or pleading is required.

TENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE

Denied. As a conclusion of law to which no response or pleading is required.

ELEVENTH AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE

Denied. As a conclusion of law to which no response or pleading is required.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff, Kristin Haines, demands judgement in her favor and relief as set

forth in her Complaint.

LAW OFFICES OF GREGG R. DURLOFSKY

BY: _________________________________

Gregg R. Durlofsky, Esquire

I.D.# 66253

111 W. Germantown Pike

Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462

610-834-9483

Attorney for Plaintiff

Case 2:02-cv-04432-BWK Document 7 Filed 09/18/2002 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

DOLORES (DEE) BARRETT : 

 : 

 V. : CIVIL ACTION - LAW 

 : 

THE GREATER HATBORO CHAMBER NO. 02 -cv-4421 

OF COMMERCE, INC.; JOHN J.(BUD) : 

AIKEN, AND MICKEY GLANTZ : JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

PLAINTIFF'S ANSWER TO DEFENDANTS'

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

AND NOW, this day of January 2005, comes Plaintiff Dolores (Dee) Barrett, by and 

through counsel, Anita F. Alberts Esquire, and requests this Honorable Court to deny defendants' 

motion for summary judgment for the following reasons: 

 1. Defendants attempt to manufacture evidence to support their contention that genuine 

diversity of citizenship is somehow lacking; Plaintiff had changed her domicile from 

Pennsylvania to New Jersey and was a citizen of New Jersey when this action was filed in July 

2002. See 2002 NJ Homestead Tax Rebate Application, and 2002 NJ1040 tax form attached to 

Affidavit of Plaintiff, Exhibit "A" hereto. 

 2. Plaintiff and her husband moved to New Jersey in April 2001 when Mrs. Barrett 

became employed as Executive Director of the Greater Wildwood Hotel Motel Association 

(GWHMA) after her job search in Pennsylvania failed, because defendants publicly announced 

she had been fired. 

 3. Plaintiff's husband, an engineer, was employed by Lockheed Martin in Moorestown 

New Jersey for years before Plaintiff was employed by GWHMA. Mr. and Mrs. Barrett's current 

checking and savings accounts were opened in New Jersey 15 years ago because Mr. Barrett 

Case 2:02-cv-04421-PBT Document 25 Filed 01/20/2005 Page 1 of 2
worked in that state. All of Plaintiff's income is earned and taxed in New Jersey. She pays New 

Jersey local and state taxes. 

 4. Plaintiff has not voted in Pennsylvania since she became employed with GWHMA in 

April 2001 because she was working on election days. She did not obtain absentee ballots to 

vote in Pennsylvania. She is a registered voter in New Jersey and is active in local politics there. 

 5. The nature of Plaintiff's job requires her constant involvement in civic and business 

organizations in New Jersey. She has established and maintained domicile in New Jersey and 

intends to remain a citizen of New Jersey indefinitely. 

 6. Contents of Plaintiff's Memorandum of Law and Affidavit opposing Summary 

Judgment are incorporated herein as if set forth in full, in the interest of brevity. 

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 

be denied, dismissed and overruled. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

 AFA2128 

 ____________________________ 

 Anita F. Alberts Esquire ID # 28086 

 Counsel for Plaintiff Dee Barrett 

 The Atrium Suite 2 West 

 301 South Main Street 

 Doylestown PA 18901 

 (215) 340-0700 

 FAX (215) 340-2747 

Case 2:02-cv-04421-PBT Document 25 Filed 01/20/2005 Page 2 of 2
No. 52515.

protest 133825-K.—

#### Park & Tilford Import Corp. *v.*United States,

Plaintiff’s application for rehearing granted.
No. 62509.

#### F. C. Mackay et al. *v.*United States,

protests 313655-K, etc. (Pembina).

Donlon, Judge:

These protests were consolidated for trial, evidence was adduced, and the protests submitted for decision, with leave granted counsel to file briefs. Counsel now have filed a stipulation asking that the submission be set aside. The stipulation includes a written notice that plaintiffs abandon these protests.

Order setting aside the submission has been filed. The consolidated protests, having been abandoned, are dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
### -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

36 38 40 

## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 06/17 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 17 Jun 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.06 N 76.88 WMeters AGL 

## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■



## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★ ● ● ● ● 

## ★ ● ● ● ●
No. 66294.

#### Berolio Import Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 61/1786 (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Since the protest was filed more than 60 days after liquidation, it was dismissed as untimely, by virtue of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

HELEN and WALTER BREMER :

: CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-CV-4178

Plaintiffs, :

:

v. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION;

BAYER AG;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE;

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM

:

:

:

:

:

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

:

Defendants. :

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of the Court:

Kindly enter the appearances of Hope S. Freiwald, Aline Fairweather, Erin

Brennan and Kirstin J. Miller as attorneys for defendant SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a

GlaxoSmithKline.

Respectfully Submitted,

_____________________________ _____________________________

Hope S. Freiwald Aline Fairweather

_____________________________ _____________________________

Erin Brennan Kirstin J. Miller

DECHERT PRICE & RHOADS

4000 Bell Atlantic Tower

1717 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2793

(215) 994-4000

Case 2:02-cv-04178-JG Document 7 Filed 09/16/2002 Page 1 of 1
COALITION PROVISIONAL AUTHORITY
BAGHDAD, IRAQ

PUBLIC NOTICE

INCREASED SENTENCES FOR PERSONS
CONVICTED OF WEAPONS VIOLATIONS UNDER
AMENDED REVISED CPA ORDER 3
AFTER HAVING BEEN CONDITIONALLY RELEASED FROM
INTERNMENT

December 31, 2003

The Administrator of the Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA) hereby advises all
citizens, residents of and visitors to Iraq of the following:

Any person who was conditionally released from internment by Coalition Forces
and is thereafter convicted of any violation of Revised Amended CPA Order 3,
shall be sentenced using rules that allow greater punishment based on aggravating
circumstances. These rules permit judges to impose significantly longer sentences
than are otherwise authorized for the particular offense.

Persons conditionally released ftom internment should be aware that they will be
subject to the severest sentences allowed by law if they commit crimes subsequent

to their conditional release. /
{ {
i | Ge

L. Paul Bremer III
Administrator
Case No. 5,269.

#### GATES v. SMITH.

[See Case No. 5,286.)