###### 

###### 

###### **GUIDE FOR BASIC ACCOUNTING AND REPORTING**

**FOR DIRECT LOAN PROGRAMS**

**WITHOUT COLLATERAL**

**IN FEDERAL CREDIT PROGRAM**

**EFFECTIVE FISCAL YEAR 2017**

### 

****

****

**PREPARED BY:**

**CREDIT REFORM SUBCOMMITTEE ANDUNITED STATES STANDARD GENERAL LEDGER ADVISORY DIVISION**

**GOVERNMENTWIDE ACCOUNTING**

**BUREAU OF THE FISCAL SERVICE**

**U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY**

**TABLE OF CONTENTS**

OVERVIEW1

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK4

ACCOUNT TABLES5

TRANSACTIONS - YEAR 19

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS57

TRANSACTIONS – YEAR 271

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS89

APPENDIX 1: ACCOUNTING FOR  MANDATORY DIRECT LOAN PROGRAMS99

APPENDIX 2: ACCOUNTING FOR DOWNWARD RE-ESTIMATES IN DISCRETIONARY AND MANDATORY DIRECT LOAN PROGRAMS107

APPENDIX 3: NEGATIVE SUBSIDY121

APPENDIX 4: REFERENCES138

APPENDIX 5:  CREDIT REFORM SUBCOMMITTEE139

# Version History

###### **GUIDE FOR BASIC ACCOUNTING AND REPORTING**

**FOR DIRECT LOAN PROGRAMS**

**WITHOUT COLLATERAL**

**IN FEDERAL CREDIT PROGRAM**

# 

- ii -

# OVERVIEW

This guide is designed for those who:

· Formulate and execute Federal credit program budgets, including accounting for assets, liabilities, net position, income, and expenses, and budgetary resources;

· Prepare agency financial statements;

· Audit the agency financial statements;

· Manage or provide service to participants in loan guarantee programs;

· Design and maintain computer systems for financial programs;

· Instruct others in basic accounting and reporting for direct loan programs without collateral.

The guide is illustrative, rather than authoritative, and is categorized as “other accounting literature” in the hierarchy of accounting principles for Federal entities.[footnoteRef:1]  It supersedes the original and subsequent direct loan scenarios.  Users may download the guide from the Bureau of the Fiscal Service (Fiscal Service) Web site at https://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/fsreports/ref/ussgl/approved_scenarios/approved_scenarios.htm#creditreform. [1: See §142, p.28, Financial Reporting Requirements, OMB Circular A-136, dated October 7, 2016.] 

In order to understand and gain the most from the guide, users must have a working knowledge of the following:

· Budgetary and proprietary accounting, reporting, and terminology;

· The United States Standard General Ledger (USSGL) accounts for basic annual operating appropriations and revolving funds; 

· The Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board Standards and Technical Releases related to credit reform accounting;

· The Credit Reform Act and other requirements established by the Act; and

· The Concepts and Standards of Federal credit program accounting and reporting, fund structures, and terminology.  

This guide is a study in accounting and reporting for a discretionary direct loan program under the Federal Credit Reform Act of 1990, as amended, for direct loans obligated after September 30, 1991.  Direct loans are disbursements of funds by the Government to a non-federal borrower under a contract that requires repayment of such funds with or without interest.[footnoteRef:2]   [2: OMB Circular A-11 (Revised – July 1, 2016), Section 185.3(d)] 

Transactions are presented over a 1-year period (fiscal year 1) for a fictitious Federal agency with a single direct loan program with no risk categories.  Transactions for fiscal year 2 show the disposition of the re-estimated subsidy accrued in fiscal year 1.  Common transactions and reports are covered in addition to transactions unique to Federal credit program accounting.  However, since accounting for accruals and undelivered orders with advances are not unique to credit reform accounting, they are not presented.  In addition, transactions involving collateral are excluded, since they are covered in a separate guide.  Entries are made in general journal form, using USSGL accounts, and are summarized in trial balances for each year.  

The transactions shown are:

· Formulation, apportionment, and allotment of the budget;

· Receipt of subsidy and administrative expense appropriations;

· Transfer of subsidy from the program to the financing fund;

· Borrowing from Treasury and repayment of loans and interest;

· Disbursement of loans to program participants and collection of principal and interest from them;

· Disbursement of administrative expenses;[footnoteRef:3] [3: The illustration is for payment of administrative expenses without prior obligation through undelivered orders or accounts payable.  Though administrative expenses will usually be obligated before payment, there is nothing about the transactions unique to credit program accounting, and hence, prior obligations are not shown.] 

· Modification of loan terms, with resulting adjustment to program levels and return of excess borrowing from Treasury and reduction of borrowing authority;

· Accrual and receipt or disbursement of subsidy re-estimates and related interest; 

· Accrual of collectible and uncollectible interest from borrowers;

· Amortization of allowance for subsidy;

· Write-off of bad debts without receiving collateral; 

· Capitalization of accrued interest paid; and

· Closing entries.

The yearend agency reports presented are listed below:

· Balance Sheet;

· Statement of Net Cost;

· Statement of Changes in Net Position;

· Statement of Budgetary Resources;

· SF 133: Report on Budget Execution and Budgetary Resources and Budget****Program and Financing Schedule (Schedule P); and

· Credit Program Footnote (including the Schedule of Changes in the Allowance for Subsidy).

A SF 132:  Apportionment and Reapportionment Schedule report is furnished at the beginning of each year.

This guide includes   five  appendices.  Appendix 1 discusses basic differences encountered in mandatory programs.  Appendix 2 provides the recording and reporting for downward reestimates of subsidy for both a discretionary and a mandatory program.  Appendix 3  provides the recording and reporting of  negative subsidy. Appendix 4  provides a listing of key references related to credit program accounting.  If the references change, this document will be updated accordingly and published on the Fiscal Service Web site at https://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/fsreports/ref/ussgl/ussgl_home.htm.  Appendix 5 provides a list of agency representatives that assisted in the preparation of this document.

Users may send questions to the Fiscal Service Web site at https://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/fsreports/ref/ussgl/form-issues.htm by using the online USSGL Issue Form.  This Web site also provides a list of the USSGL representatives and their telephone numbers.  Users may contact the Director, USSGL Advisory Division, Fiscal Service, via e-mail.

###### **GUIDE FOR BASIC ACCOUNTING AND REPORTING**

**FOR DIRECT LOAN PROGRAMS**

**WITHOUT COLLATERAL**

**IN FEDERAL CREDIT PROGRAM**

# 

                                                     1  of 139		                         January 2017

# CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK

This guide uses numbers and titles for USSGL accounts.  When necessary, titles for USSGL accounts are expanded by using brackets to capture, clarify, or add specific information, for illustrative purposes only. For example, administrative expense, “[Administrative Expense]” is included after the title for USSGL 610000 account, “Operating Expenses/Program Costs.” In the same manner, for interest supplement expense, “[Interest Supplement],” is included after the title for the USSGL 610000 account.  The USSGL Supplement, Section II, contains definitions for USSGL accounts.

Entries are in general journal form, using USSGL accounts, and are summarized in trial balances for each year. Note that the financing fund is used only in the transactions for Post-Credit Reform scenarios, and the liquidating fund is used only in the transactions for Pre-Credit Reform scenarios.

USSGL accounts that, by themselves, do not directly provide the reporting that is illustrated, are supplemented with additional detail. The entries made and the method chosen to illustrate the detail provide only one-way of accounting. Agencies may have other ways of structuring their ledgers and making journal entries to accomplish the same result.

# ACCOUNT TABLES

The following tables identify the accounts used in the guide to record transactions and prepare reports.  Since the transactions are not comprehensive, the tables do not contain all accounts that agencies may use in day-to-day activities.

### **DIRECT LOANS**

### 

### **YEAR 1**

The Direct Loan Agency has been authorized to make loans beginning in fiscal year 1.  The agency has a single, discretionary direct loan program with no risk categories.[footnoteRef:5] The Congress has authorized annual appropriations[footnoteRef:6] for basic subsidy, modified subsidy, and administrative expenses; permanent indefinite appropriations for upward re-estimates of subsidy, with related interest; and permanent indefinite borrowing authority for the unsubsidized portion of loans made.  The agency’s authorizing legislation makes it subject to the Credit Reform Act of 1990, as amended.  An authorized agency official provides blanket allotment authority for all realized resources, as they are realized, up to the amount apportioned by OMB.   [5: Programs, which have risk categories, must maintain separate financing fund accounting for each risk category.]  [6: While annual appropriations for basic and modified subsidy, which are common in discretionary direct loan programs, are illustrated in the case, some programs may have multi-year or permanent indefinite appropriations provided for these purposes in their underlying legislation.  Accounting for these types of appropriations is essentially the same as it would be for basic operating appropriations or revolving funds, which had them.] 

The agency borrows the full amount it expects to need at the beginning of the year, and gives back the amount it has not obligated at the end of the year.  All collections are used to repay principal and interest on its Treasury loans.[footnoteRef:7] [7:  Although the guide indicates that the full amount of the borrowing occurs at the beginning of the year, it (borrowing) can occur throughout the year.] 

The agency has authority to obligate $120,000 in loans in fiscal year 1, for which the subsidy model shows a 21.5 percent subsidy rate, comprised of:

•	Defaults, 20 percent;				20.0

•	Interest differential,[footnoteRef:8] 2 percent; and		  2.0 [8: This is the difference between interest charged borrowers and interest the agency must pay to Treasury on loans to make the borrowing.] 

•	Fees, (.5) percent.				   (.5)

· Administrative expenses for Year 1 have been authorized in the amount of $5,000, and loans are to be funded with (1) monies received from the appropriation subsidy and (2) borrowing from Treasury for the remainder.  

· It is expected that $11,000 of loan principal, $500 of loan interest and $500 in fees will be received in Year 1, and that Fiscal Service  principal of $11,300 will be repaid, plus interest of $700 (total $12,000).  

· Current, definite appropriations, permanent indefinite borrowing authority, and authorization for the appropriate collections are authorized in the legislation.

The agency prepared the following request for apportionment (SF 132):

# Direct Loan Agency

######                                                                  Fiscal Year 1

# 

# 

# 

# 

# 

# 

# TRANSACTIONS - YEAR 1

**1-1  To record the enactment of appropriations.**[footnoteRef:10] [10: This footnote corresponds to TC A104, A140, A142,  and  A152. Annual appropriations are considered realized based on the underlying legislation.  Agencies that have multi-year appropriations in other than their final year, or permanent indefinite appropriations, would normally need to anticipate their appropriations prior to realizing them. If under a continuing resolution, refer to the Appropriations Provided by a Continuing Resolution scenario at https://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/fsreports/ref/ussgl/approved_scenarios/approved_scenarios.htm] 

### 

### ***Program Fund***

### ***Financing Fund***

**1-2.  The agency’s requests for apportionment were approved by OMB without change, and the apportionment was recorded.~~~~**

***Program Fund***

***Financing Fund***

**1-3  Issued a blanket authorization to allot anticipated resources as they were realized, not to exceed the amount of the apportionment.***~~~~*

***Program Fund***

***Financing Fund***

**1-4.  Borrowed from the Bureau of the Fiscal Service (Fiscal Service) the amount required to make $118,000 in loans. [footnoteRef:11]** [11:  ($118,000 loans*subsidy rate 21.5% = subsidy to be transferred from Program Fund to Financing Fund  = $25, 370.  This amount is reduced from the $118,000, which would leave an amount to borrow of $92, 630).] 

***Financing Fund***

**1-5.  Paid administrative expenses of $4,950.  $4000 was for employees and 950 to GSA.  No undelivered orders were placed or accruals made before payment.**[footnoteRef:12] [12:  This footnote corresponds to TC B106 and B134. Typically in standard federal accounting, undelivered orders (4800xx) would be placed with vendors to acquire the goods, and the invoices would be accrued as payable (490100) before they were paid: however, in credit programs those particular accounting events do not exist.    As a result, we will not illustrate those particular transactions in the case study because they are not necessary.   ] 

### ***Program Fund***

**1-6.  Agreed to make $90,000 of loans, subject to the loan applicants meeting conditions placed on them**.  

### ***Program Fund***

To recognize the subsidy to be transferred from the program fund.

***Financing Fund***

**1-7.  Applicants for $87,000 of the $90,000 of loan commitments met the conditions for making the loans.  Subsidy was transferred from the program fund to the financing fund, and the loans were disbursed to the applicants.**[footnoteRef:17] **Applicants for the remaining $3,000 of loans have not yet met the conditions.** [17: Although separate procedures would be involved to transfer the monies and to disburse the loans, they both should be performed simultaneously.] 

***Program Fund***

**

***Financing Fund***

**Collections from borrowers during the year were as follows:**

**•	Application fees, $480**[footnoteRef:22]  [22: Though all collections from federal sources are recorded together for purposes of the case, the application fees would probably be collected in conjunction with making the loans.  They would normally be one of the conditions that applicants would have to meet.  Some programs may collect fees from borrowers each year, in addition to principal and interest.] 

**•	Loan principal, $10,000**

**•	Loan interest, $500**

**1-8a.  To record unearned fees collected in the financing fund.  $80.00 in fees are unearned.**

***Financing Fund***

**1-8b.  To record the receipt of previously anticipated collections. ~~~~**

***Financing Fund***

**1-8c.  To record anticipated resources as realized.**

**1-8d.  To record fees as earned.**[footnoteRef:24] [24:  This footnote corresponds to TC C118. Each agency may have a different way of recognizing when fees are earned.  For example, some agencies may adjust at predetermined intervals such as the end of a month or other accounting period.] 

**1-9.  The collections received were paid to Fiscal Service.  $700 was for interest on the agency loan from Fiscal Service, and $10,280 was for principal.[footnoteRef:25],** [25: In a direct loan financing fund, offsetting collections other than basic subsidy from the program fund, which is used to make loans, is normally paid to Fiscal Service for interest and to reduce the loan principal.  Exceptions are made when monies are needed for other purposes, such as to repair or maintain foreclosed property on defaulted loans, or Federal Financing Bank funded direct loans , which is not included in this guide.Note that it is an OMB requirement that the repayment of principal to Treasury is a non-expenditure transaction (i.e. it does not count as obligations or outlays), whereas payment of interest on debt to Treasury is an expenditure transaction (it does count).  Section 20.6, indicates that agencies should not record outlays for the repayment of debt principal, because borrowings and the repayment of debt principal are treated as a means of financing.] 

***1-9a  To record principal repayments to the Fiscal Service.***~~~~

### ***Financing Fund***

***1-9b To record payment of interest not previously accrued.[footnoteRef:27]***** [27:  “The example for illustrative purposes simplifies the transactions reflecting only the year-end payment without an accrual. However, it is standard government practice that agencies do accrue interest expense monthly, and the Federal Borrowings Branch (FBB) of the Dept. of Treasury records the corresponding interest revenue. The interest revenue accrual and the interest collected by the FBB in the Miscellaneous Receipt Fund are recorded by the FBB and not reflected on the agencies books and financial statements.”] 

1-10 **After consultation and agreement with OMB, the agency decided to modify the terms of loans for some borrowers.  Following the modification guidance provided in OMB’s circular A-11, Section 185, to determine the cost or savings of the modification action, this modification resulted in a decrease to the net present value cash flows, a cost in the amount of $1,000.**[footnoteRef:28]**** [28: Before making the modifications, the agency must be certain that it has sufficient unobligated resources for subsidy in the program fund.  In this case, the amount of unobligated resources, as represented by allotments related to the subsidy, amounted to $6,450, ($25,800 less $19,350 from transaction 1-6).] 

**This $1,000 is recorded as an obligation and increase of subsidy cost against the current fiscal year appropriated budgetary authority in the program fund.  Modifications may be made only to the extent that budgetary authority for the additional cost has been provided in advance and is available in the program account.**

**Because this $1,000 had originally been apportioned for use in making new loans and was part of the calculation of available loan levels and required borrowing authority, the agency submitted a revised request for apportionment to reduce apportioned loan levels and increase the anticipated repayment of Treasury Debt.  The authorized loan level was reduced from $120,000 to $115,349**[footnoteRef:29]**In addition, the adjusted loan levels required only $90,549**[footnoteRef:30]**in borrowing authority.  Based on the original estimates, $92,630 of the original $94,200 was executed and converted to cash.** [29: The subsidy rate for Year 1 is 21.5%.  The original subsidy authorized to support $120,000 in loans was $25,800.  The remaining subsidy, after the modification, was $24,800.  This $24,800 will support the making of only $115,349 in new loans ($24,800/. 215).  ]  [30: The loan level of $115,349 is provided via subsidy of 21.5 percent (see previous footnote) and borrowing of 78.5 percent.  The borrowing authority required to support $115,349 of loans is $90,549 (computed as $115,349 x .785, or as $115,349 less the subsidy, computed in the preceding note, of $24,800).  ] 

**In addition to calculating the cost or savings of any modifying action, the Agency must also calculate the Modification Adjustment Transfer (MAT).  The MAT is designed to account for the disconnect between the discount rate used to calculate the cost of the modification and the interest rate at which the cohort pays or earns interest.  The MAT corrects a resource imbalance in the financing account that would occur if only the change in subsidy cost was reflected in the transfer between the financing account and the general fund.  The MAT can either be negative or positive.  A negative MAT results in a transfer from the financing account to the general fund.  A positive MAT results in a transfer from the general fund to the financing account in the form of a permanent appropriation. Using the modification adjustment transfer guidance in OMB Circular A-11 Section 185, the agency has determined the above****modification has resulted in an upward modification adjustment transfer in the amount of $5.**

· *OMB Circular  A-11, Section 185.20, Capital transfers and redemption of debt (line 1842) are not obligations and therefore do not need to be apportioned on line 8.   However, you do need to plan for repayments and show your estimated debt repayments as a negative on line 1842 when you submit your SF 132.*

· *OMB Circular A-11, Section 185.19, for financing accounts, additional interest payment amounts to Treasury (i.e. amounts exceeding your estimate on the most recent approved apportionment) are automatically apportioned.*

The resulting revised request for apportionment, which OMB approved, is illustrated following the entries below**.**[footnoteRef:31]  When a direct loan is modified, the offsetting collection for the modification cost is used to reduce the debt owed to Treasury.  [31: Note that the form is also updated for actual transactions, which have occurred, such that actual offsetting collections are shown on line 1800 and actual payments to the Bureau of the Fiscal Service are shown on line 1822.] 

***Financing Fund***

***1-10a To record decreases to indefinite borrowing authority.[footnoteRef:32]  ~~~~(Record the reduction in borrowing authority from SF132).*** [32:  Note that the decrease in indefinite borrowing authority is not included in the modification entry.  The decrease in indefinite borrowing authority is for year 1 in total.] 

***10b To record anticipated nonexpenditure payments to Treasury. [footnoteRef:33]***~~~~(To record the increase to anticipated repayment of borrowings from SF132). [33:  USSGL account 404800,  Anticipated Transfers to the General Fund of the U.S. Government – Prior-Year may also be needed/used.] 

***10c To record the reduction in apportionment to make loans from SF132.***

***10d To record the anticipation of appropriation.***(from SF132)******

***10e To record the return of excess borrowing to*Fiscal Service*(as a result of the modification).***[footnoteRef:35] [35:   Amount of Borrowing Realized in excess of Borrowing required based upon reduced lending authority.] 

1-11  The agency modified the terms of the loans, as discussed in the previous transaction.  The present value of these modifications decreased the present value of the loans by $1,000, requiring additional subsidy from the program fund, which was transferred to the financing fund.

***1-11a  To record the payment of subsidy to financing fund.***

***Program Fund***

***1-11b  To record the collection of subsidy for loan modification costs in the financing fund.***

### 

### ***Financing Fund***

**The $1,000 of collections for the subsidy modifications will be used to repay principal on the debt to Fiscal Service.**

***1-11c*****The modification approved and executed in previous transactions was deemed to require a positive modification adjustment transfer.  The MAT is designed to account for the disconnect between the discount rate used to calculate the cost of the modification and the interest rate at which the cohort pays or earns interest.   If the MAT is negative, the amount should be transferred from the financing account to the general fund.  A negative MAT (not reflected below) would result in a capital transfer and debits to USSGL accounts 579100 Adjustment to Financing Sources , 139900, Allowance for Subsidy, and 404700, Anticipated Transfers to the General Fund of the U.S. Government – Current-Year Authority, and credits to USSGL accounts 101000, Fund Balance With Treasury, 719000, Other Gains, and 415100, Actual Capital Transfers to the General Fund of the U.S. Government, Current-Year Authority, in the financing fund.  If the MAT is positive then the amount would be recorded as a permanent appropriation from the General Fund for the amount of the modification (as reflected in this example).~~~~**

**Program Fund**

***Financing Fund***

**1-12  To record principal repayments to Fiscal Service via nonexpenditure transfer that was previously anticipated.**[footnoteRef:38] [footnoteRef:39]  [38:  Offsetting Collection from Modification.]  [39: ] 

***Financing Fund***

*Note:  Although separated for ease of illustration in the case, transactions 1-10 through 1-12 should occur simultaneously*

1-13 Treasury credited $15 to the financing fund for interest the fund earned on its unused Fund Balance with Treasury during the year.

**To record receipt of previously anticipated collections.**

***Financing Fund***

**1-14  The interest collected from Fiscal Service was used to pay principal on the agency’s loan from Fiscal Service.**

**To record principal repayment to the Fiscal Service via nonexpenditure transfers that was previously anticipated.**

***Financing Fund***

**1-15.  Interest of $55 was accrued as receivable on the loans.  Of that, $5 was related to loans, which were still performing.**[footnoteRef:40] [40: This footnote corresponds to TC C420.  Agencies establish their own criteria for when notes are not “performing”–i.e., when borrowers are considered to no longer be paying on their loan principal and interest, at which point the loans may be sent to Treasury or the Justice Department for collection.] 

***Financing Fund***[footnoteRef:41]** [41: Note that there is no budgetary entry here.  This is because receivables from the public are generally not recognized in the Federal Budget until they are collected.] 

**1-16.  The allowance for subsidy was amortized.**

***Financing Fund***

**1-17.  As no further loans were disbursed during the year, the unneeded monies borrowed from Treasury were returned.**[footnoteRef:43] [43:  This footnote corresponds to TC B120. This entry would not be applicable, if an agency does not borrow all of its authority at the beginning of the year.  Instead the agency would post a debit to 445000, Unapportioned Authority and a credit to 414300, Decreases to Indefinite Borrowing Authority.  (A148)] 

***Financing Fund***

**1-18.  The agency determined that $10 of loan principal and $20 of loan interest could not be collected, and wrote the receivables off.**[footnoteRef:45] [45: This footnote corresponds to TC D414. This determination of uncollectibility would be made only after attempting to collect the receivables under provisions of the Federal Debt Collection Act.] 

***Financing Fund***

**1-19.  Subsidy analysis at year-end****indicated that an additional subsidy of $440 was needed.  The “technical” re-estimate (including interest on the re-estimate) was $435, and the interest rate re-estimate was $5.**[footnoteRef:46] [46: This footnote corresponds to TC B420 and C438. The concepts underlying these re-estimates are discussed in SFFAS No.  18, Amendments to Accounting Standards for Direct Loans and Loan Guarantees in SFFAS No.  2.  Note that there are no budgetary entries made, because, in accordance with the Federal Credit Reform Act, the budget will not recognize this transaction until Year 2.  Per OMB Circular A-11, Section 185. 2, Interest rate reestimates adjust for the effect on the subsidy of differences between actual interest rates and the discount rates assumed when estimates were made for budget formulation and obligation.  These reestimates must be made when the cohort is at least 90 percent disbursed.  Technical reestimates adjust for revised assumptions about loan performances, such as differences between assumed and actual default rates or new projections of prepayments.  See Appendix 2 for downward reestimates.] 

***Program Fund***

***Financing Fund***

1-20 **Accrued interest of $30 was capitalized (converted to principal) on outstanding loans**.

***Financing Fund***

**PRECLOSING ENTRIES**

***Financing Fund***

To close anticipated resources[footnoteRef:47] [47: USSGL account 459000 is zero before closing, and hence is not in this closing entry.  Note, however, that if it had a balance, it would also be debited for that balance in the entry.] 

###### **GUIDE FOR BASIC ACCOUNTING AND REPORTING**

**FOR DIRECT LOAN PROGRAMS**

**WITHOUT COLLATERAL**

**IN FEDERAL CREDIT PROGRAM**

**CLOSING ENTRIES**

**1-21 Closing entries were made.**

***Program Fund***

***Program Fund***

***Financing Fund***

***Financing Fund***

# FINANCIAL STATEMENTS[footnoteRef:50] [50:   Statements updated as of USSGL TFM Bulletin No. 2017-01.  ] 

**Direct Loan Agency**

**Balance Sheet**

**September 30, FY-1**

**Direct Loan Agency**

**For Fiscal Year Ended September 30, FY-1**

****

**Direct Loan Agency**

**For Fiscal Year Ended September 30, FY-1**

**Direct Loan Agency**

**For Fiscal Year Ended September 30, FY-1**

**Direct Loan Agency**

**For Fiscal Year Ended September 30, FY-1**

**Direct Loan Agency**

**September 30, FY-1**

**YEAR 2**

In fiscal year 1, an upward adjustment of subsidy expense was accrued, in accordance with the requirements of SFFAS No.  2, *Accounting for Direct Loans and Loan Guarantees*.  Although the expense was recognized in fiscal year 1, the year to which it applies, the Credit Reform Act specifies that budgetary resources to fund it are not provided until the following year--fiscal year 2.  This section provides journal entries to obtain and apply those budgetary resources in fiscal year 2, and the related reporting at year-end

During fiscal year 2, there would be transactions for a new cohort of loans, and accounting would need to be separated between the two.  However, the basic transactions would be the same for the second cohort as was already illustrated for fiscal year 1 for the first cohort.  Transactions for cohort 1 would be similar, except that no new loans would be made.  Rather, loans obligated, but not disbursed at the end of fiscal year 1 would be disbursed, and transactions subsequent to disbursement would be basically the same as already illustrated for fiscal year 1.  The transactions illustrated for this year are limited to those relating to the disposition of the upward subsidy re-estimate accrued at the end of the preceding year.

# TRANSACTIONS – YEAR 2

2-1.  A request for apportionment was prepared for $440 of appropriations in the program fund to be transferred to the financing fund, which will use it to repay principal on the debt to Treasury.  Another request was prepared for the financing fund.  The SF-132's constituting the request is shown on the next page.  

# Direct Loan Agency

**Fiscal Year 2**

****

***2-1a  To record an anticipated appropriation.***

***Program Fund***

***2-1b  To record anticipated resources apportioned but not available for use until they are realized.***

***Program Fund***

***2-1c  To record anticipated collections and anticipated non-expenditure payments to Treasury.*****

***Financing Fund***

# 

# 

***2-2  To record the enactment of the appropriations.***

***Program Fund***

**2-3.  To record the realization of previously anticipated and apportioned authority for programs subject to apportionment.**

### ***Program Fund***

***Financing Fund***

No entry[footnoteRef:57] [57: Note that there is no apportionment of resources, since the $440 expected to be collected is going to be returned to Treasury.  Hence, there is no apportionment to record.  The approved SF-132 will nonetheless be kept to evidence OMB’s approval of the collection and payment to Treasury.] 

**2-4.  Agency recorded allotment of authority.**

***Program Fund***

***Financing Fund***

No entry[footnoteRef:58] [58: Because there is no apportionment of resources (see previous footnote), there is no allotment of them.] 

2-5.  The re-estimated subsidy was transferred from the program fund to the financing fund.

***2-5a  To record the re-estimated subsidy payable in the program account.*****

### ***Program Fund***

***Financing Fund***

***2-5b  To record the disbursement of reestimate from the program fund to the financing fund.*****

### ***Program Fund***

***2-5c  To record collection of subsidy for an upward re-estimate in the financing account.*****

***Financing Fund***

**

*2-6*The financing fund used the subsidy collected to repay principal on its loan from  Fiscal Service.

***To record principal repayments to the Fiscal Service via non-expenditure transfers that was previously anticipated.*****

***Financing Fund***

****

**CLOSING ENTRIES**

**2-6.  Closing entries were made.**

***Program Fund***

***Financing Fund***[footnoteRef:59] [59: Note that there are no closing entries required for the financing fund, because there were no transactions involving financing sources or expenses.] 

# FINANCIAL STATEMENTS[footnoteRef:60] [60:  Statements updated as of USSGL TFM  Bulletin No. 2017-01.] 

**Direct Loan Agency**

**September 30, FY-2**

**Direct Loan Agency**

**For Fiscal Year Ended September 30, FY-2**

**Direct Loan Agency**

**For Fiscal Year Ended September 30, FY2**

###### **GUIDE FOR BASIC ACCOUNTING AND REPORTING**

**FOR DIRECT LOAN PROGRAMS**

**WITHOUT COLLATERAL**

**IN FEDERAL CREDIT PROGRAM**

**APPENDIX 1**

**Direct Loan Agency**

**For Fiscal Year Ended September 30, FY2**

****

# APPENDIX 1: ACCOUNTING FOR MANDATORY DIRECT LOAN PROGRAMS

**INTRODUCTION**

The case presented in the body of this document was for common transactions undertaken by a discretionary direct loan program.  This appendix discusses basic differences between discretionary and mandatory direct loan programs, and shows how the prior entries in this guide would differ for a mandatory program with typical funding characteristics.

**BASIC DIFFERENCES BETWEEN DISCRETIONARY AND MANDATORY PROGRAMS**

In a discretionary program, Congress sets a funding level, and program agencies make loans up to the amount that can be supported from subsidy in their program fund.  Program fund subsidy is usually provided by annual or multi-year appropriations, although no-year (permanent indefinite) appropriations can be given by the Congress should they choose to do so.  

Annual appropriation authority expires at the end of the fiscal year that it funds, and multi-year appropriations expire at the end of the last year of their period of availability.  For example, appropriations good for three years expire at the end of the third year funded.  No new obligations may be placed against expired authority, and agencies generally have five years after the date of expiration to fill obligations and pay liabilities before both the obligated and unobligated authority is canceled and cannot be used for any purposes.  Congress sometimes provides for different periods of expiration.[footnoteRef:62] [62: The legislation providing for this is P.L.  101-510, which is a separate part of the Defense Appropriation Act of 1990, applying more broadly to most federal agencies.  The U.S.  USSGL Board has published a document entitled Budgetary Accounting in the Federal Government which is available through its website at https://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/fsreports/ref/ussgl/approved_scenarios/approved_scenarios.htm. ] 

The government also operates mandatory (entitlement) direct loan programs, in which Congress usually authorizes permanent indefinite appropriations for subsidy.  If there are a sufficient number of applicants who meet criteria established by Congress for the program that the subsidy is insufficient to support the loans, additional subsidy monies are normally provided by drawing additional appropriations.  The Congress may set rules in which it must concur with the additional funding, or it may place a cap on the total funding.  These no-year appropriations do not have a date of expiration, and unobligated subsidy appropriation authority may be used as long as the programs they fund remain authorized by the Congress.

Congress may provide appropriations for administrative expenses

 that have annual, multi-year, or no-year expiration.  It is probably most common for both discretionary and mandatory direct loan programs to have annual administrative expense appropriations.  Thus, no differences in accounting for administrative expenses will be presented.  However, multi-year administrative expense appropriations in other than the last year covered, and no-year administrative expense appropriations, would be accounted for in the same manner as will be shown for no-year appropriations of subsidy authority.

Another difference between discretionary and mandatory direct loan programs is that when downward adjustments to subsidy are called for during the subsidy re-estimation process to properly value direct loans at the estimated value of their cash flows, discretionary programs must generally return the excess money in their financing fund to the Treasury by transferring it to a designated miscellaneous receipt account.  Mandatory programs generally may recycle this excess by transferring it back to their program account.  While these are the typical situations, Congress may provide for recycling of downward re-estimates for a discretionary program, or may provide that downward re-estimates in a mandatory program cannot be recycled, and must be returned to Treasury.  Recording and reporting downward re-estimates of subsidy for both a discretionary and a mandatory program is discussed in Appendix 2 to this document (recall that the agency in the body of this document illustrated accrual and disposition of an upward adjustment).

Both discretionary and mandatory direct loan programs generally have the same transactions.  In both types of programs: 

· Budgetary resources must be formulated, apportioned by OMB, and allotted by the agency; 

· Loans are made based on a combination of program fund subsidy and financing fund borrowing from Treasury; 

· Collections from federal and non-federal sources are made and used to repay principal and interest on the loan from Treasury;

· The subsidy cost allowance is re-estimated each year taking into account all factors that may have affected the estimated cash flows.  Any adjustment resulting from the re-estimate is recognized as a subsidy expense (or a reduction in subsidy expense).

Where there are differences in the type of subsidy appropriations provided and disposition of downward re-estimates, the journal entries to record the same transaction will usually differ as well.  The next section discusses those differences.

**DIFFERENCES IN JOURNAL ENTRIES FOR MANDATORY PROGRAMS**

The transactions illustrated for the discretionary direct loan program in the body of this document are virtually the same as those that would be undertaken in a mandatory program.  However, four of the journal entries would be different.  The transactions involved, and the budgetary and proprietary entries a mandatory program with no-year subsidy authority, but with the same amount of funding and other parameters as the discretionary program, would make, are set forth below.[footnoteRef:63] Note that only certain entries in fiscal year 1 are affected.  There would be no change from the discretionary program entries in fiscal year 2. [63: It is important to note these assumptions, because they form the basis for changes to be discussed.  It is possible that variations, even within the assumptions, could exist, and that entries could differ still further.  For example, OMB might decide on a lesser amount of subsidy funding than the agency anticipated in its request, and, if needed, increase the amount later (see transactions 1-1 and 1-2).  The more specific assumption in this appendix is that the nature of transactions and amounts between the discretionary and mandatory programs is the same.] 

Changes from entries illustrated for the discretionary program are highlighted in bold type.  For each transaction presented, only the fund entities for which there is a change are presented.  If a fund entity present for a transaction in the discretionary program guide were not present in the transactions illustrated below, a mandatory program would make the same entries for those fund entities.  A discussion of changes follows the revised entries for each transaction.  

1-1.  To record enactment of appropriations. 

***Program Fund***

~~~~

**Explanation of difference**

Because the program fund has permanent indefinite authority for its subsidy, formulation of the budget calls for the amount of the appropriations to be received to first be anticipated.  The appropriations will normally not be realized until OMB has approved the amount.  Accordingly, two changes must be made in the program fund entry.  First, the account for anticipated appropriations, 412000, is used instead of the account for realized subsidy appropriations, 411500.  Second, because the subsidy money is not realized at this point, the amount of Fund Balance with Treasury recorded is only the amount of the administrative expense appropriation, which is an annual appropriation.  Note that there is no change for the financing fund.

1-2.  The agency’s requests for apportionment were approved by OMB without change, and the apportionment was recorded. 

***Program Fund***

***Explanation of Difference***

There are two differences here.  First, because the subsidy appropriation was first anticipated and not realized until OMB concurred in the amount, an entry to realize the appropriation is made.  Second, along with the realization, the related fund balance with Treasury must be recorded.  Note that the combination of entries 1-1 and 1-2 yields the same account balances for both the discretionary and mandatory programs.

**1-10.  After consultation and agreement with OMB, the agency decided to modify the terms of loans for some borrowers, reducing the present value of those loans by $1,000.**

### **Financing Fund**

***Explanation of Difference***

The basic transaction is the same, the agency is making modifications to loan terms which cost the government $1,000.  However, some of the related procedures are different.  In the discretionary program, the loan level had to be reduced, and the related borrowing authority had to be reduced as well.  This was because since the subsidy appropriation was annual, having to use subsidy to modify loans meant that the subsidy was not available to use in making loans (recall that an agency can only make the amount of loans which its subsidy monies can support).  

In a mandatory program, in which additional monies can, with OMB approval, be drawn from a permanent indefinite appropriation, there is no need to reduce the program level.  The $1,000 of subsidy could be recovered by drawing an additional $1,000 from the appropriation subsidy.  The drawing of it is not made here, because in this case, we know from the discretionary program case that the full amount of subsidy, even reduced by the $1,000 used for modifications, was not used to make loans.  

Note that the $1,000 of additional subsidy to be collected would need to be paid on the Treasury loan, and hence the allotments, which would otherwise have been used to make loans, must be decreased, and the amount of anticipated payments on the loan must be increased, by the amount.

If the mandatory agency were to replenish its subsidy, it would first make the request of OMB and, if OMB concurred, would realize additional appropriation authority and receive monies from Treasury[footnoteRef:64].  Such request  [64: To make the request to replenish the subsidy now of OMB, the agency would prepare this entry in its program fund and submit an SF-132 to OMB:Then, when OMB approved the request, the agency would make these entries to record the apportionment:A related SF-132 would be prepared for the financing fund to increase its anticipated federal collections by $1,000.  The financing fund entries relating to anticipated federal collections in entries 1-1 and 1-2 would be made to request and receive the apportionment, respectively.] 

would probably be made later in the year if the demand for loans was greater than the subsidy would support, which is not the situation in the case.

*Explanation of Difference*

In conjunction with the change to entry 1-10, this entry would not be made–indeed; the transaction would not be undertaken–because there would be no need to reduce borrowing authority.  If, later in the year, the demand for loans was such that more subsidy was needed to make loans than was available in the program fund, the program fund would obtain additional subsidy from its permanent indefinite appropriation and use it, in conjunction with the existing borrowing authority, to make additional loans.  If the borrowing authority was also insufficient, additional authority would be realized, since it, too, is permanent indefinite authority.[footnoteRef:65] [65: The borrowing authority in a discretionary direct loan program is also permanent indefinite, but if the subsidy money was annual authority, which could not be augmented without additional action by the Congress, borrowing authority could not be increased to make more loans.  Even if a discretionary program had unobligated borrowing authority, if the amount of unobligated subsidy money was (say) zero, none of the borrowing authority could be used to fund new loans unless Congress authorized additional subsidy appropriations.] 

1-17.  As no further loans were disbursed during the year, the unneeded monies borrowed from Treasury were returned. 

***Financing Fund***

*Explanation of Differences*

The modification which reduced the borrowing authority by $3,651(from $94,200 to $90,549) would not have been needed with mandatory program (therefore increasing the repayment in mandatory program from $19,899 to $23,550).

**Trial Balances and Financial Statements**

Pre- and post-closing trial balances, financial statements, and the quantitative portion of the credit program note for the mandatory program would be the same as for the discretionary program for both fiscal years.  Narrative descriptions about funding and about loan levels authorized would be different, but are not illustrated for either program.  (The narrative about program level and nature of subsidy funding would be different, because the program loan level was reduced in the discretionary program but not in the mandatory program, and the subsidy appropriation in the mandatory program was no-year authority, as opposed to annual authority in the discretionary case).

# 	APPENDIX 2: ACCOUNTING FOR DOWNWARD RE-ESTIMATESIN DISCRETIONARY AND MANDATORY DIRECT LOAN PROGRAMS

**INTRODUCTION**

The nature of downward subsidy re-estimates for loans and interest receivable is the same for both discretionary and mandatory direct loan programs.  In both cases, the present value of the receivables is understated at year-end, meaning that more subsidy money was collected than is necessary to fund future net cash outflows; the value of the receivables must be adjusted accordingly; and the financing fund must relinquish the excess subsidy amount.  A SF-132 Apportionment and Reapportionment Schedule has to be done.[footnoteRef:66]  And like the upward subsidy re-estimates, an accrual for the adjustment to subsidy expense must be made at year-end, in the program fund, with an accrued receivable in the General Funds Receipt account.  The financing fund must transfer the excess subsidy amount, with interest, to the General Funds Receipt account in the following year. [66:  OMB Circular A-11, Section 185.18 Do amounts for a downward reestimate (and the interest on the reestimate) need to be apportioned?] 

The following sections illustrate accounting and reporting for a downward subsidy re-estimate in the amount of $440 (which includes a technical re-estimate (including interest on the re-estimate) and an interest rate re-estimate).For purposes of the illustration, the same figures are used as were used for the upward re-estimate in the case, except that the re-estimate will be considered to be downward.  Hence, the re-estimate components will be: downward technical re-estimate (including interest on the re-estimate) of $435; and downward interest rate re-estimate, $5.[footnoteRef:67]  [67:   Per OMB Circular A-11, Section 185. 2, Interest rate reestimates adjust for the effect on the subsidy of differences between actual interest rates and the discount rates assumed when estimates were made for budget formulation and obligation.  These reestimates must be made when the cohort is at least 90 percent disbursed.  Technical reestimates adjust for revised assumptions about loan performances, such as differences between assumed and actual default rates or new projections of prepayments.] 

The entries to accrue the downward re-estimate described in the preceding section are shown below.  The entries are reflected in the Financing Fund, Program Fund, and General Fund Receipt Account.

Fiscal Year 1

***Program Fund***

***Financing Fund***

***General Fund Receipt Account***

The first entry in the financing fund increases the present value of the receivables, and the second entry accrues the transfer-out to the general fund receipt account.  As with upward adjustments, the budget rules are that the actual cash transfer will not take place until the following year.  The negative expense accrual is reflected in the program fund.

The General Fund Receipt Account does not belong to the agency; however, it is maintained by the agency and must be reported in the agency financial statements as Non-Entity.  The agency performs the elimination between the credit agency payable (299000 in financing fund) and the general fund receipt account receivable (131000) for purposes of compiling its agency-wide financial statements and for the government-wide financial statements.   

*Financial Statement Effects*

The effect of the proprietary entries on the financial statements and credit program note is as follows:

•	The debit to account 139900 would reduce that account in the credit program note, and would increase the value of credit program assets on the balance sheet.  

•	The credit to account 680000 [subsidy Re-estimate] in the program fund would reduce subsidy expense and the net cost of operations, yielding, a net cost of operations of -$440.  

•	The statement of budgetary resources would not be affected, because there are no budgetary entries made for the accrual of downward re-estimates.  

•	The General Fund Receipt Account entry to GL 599400 affects the Statement of Changes in Net Position, while the GL 579100 entries in the program and financing funds offset one another.  The net effect would be to book an accrued financing source against the net cost (contra cost, downward re-estimate).

**Direct Loan Agency**

**(Resulting from Downward Re-estimate Transactions in Year )**

###### **GUIDE FOR BASIC ACCOUNTING AND REPORTING**

**FOR DIRECT LOAN PROGRAMS**

**WITHOUT COLLATERAL**

**IN FEDERAL CREDIT PROGRAM**

**APPENDIX 2**

*GTAS*

When a credit agency with a downward subsidy re-estimate payable to the general fund receipt account reports its trial balance of proprietary accounts to Treasury via the Governmentwide Treasury Account Symbol Adjusted Trial Balance System (GTAS for the proprietary accounts), it will include the accounts detailed above, including the entries for the General Fund Receipt Account.  The agency will perform the elimination between the credit agency payable (299000 in financing fund) and the general fund receipt account receivable (131000) for purposes of compiling its agency-wide financial statements and for the government-wide financial statements.   The agency should reflect the miscellaneous receipt fund as non-entity.

Please refer to the General Fund Receipt Account Guide for information on these transactions involving the general fund.

**FISCAL YEAR 2**

In Year 2, the cash to satisfy the liability to the miscellaneous receipt fund would be transferred to that fund from the credit agency’s financing fund.  The following entries would be required.

**1. To record indefinite or definite authority.**

***Financing Fund***

**2. To obtain an apportionment.**

***Financing Fund***

**3. To allot the apportionment.**

**4. Borrowed from the Fiscal Service the full amount required to transfer the downward re-estimate.**

***Financing Fund***

**5. To transfer the money.**

**Program Fund**

To record the reclassification of unfunded expenses.

***Financing Fund***

**General Fund Receipt Account**

***Financial Statement Effects***

Although the money is transferred from the Financing Fund to the General Fund Receipt Account, there would be no effect on either the Balance Sheet, the Statement of Net Cost, or the Changes in Net Position because the cash (SGL 101000-from year 2) and the liability (SGL 298500-from year one) remaining in the General Fund Receipt Account remain on the agency books/statements (General Fund Receipt Account is included on the agency’s financial statements, see year one above).  

Please note that in this example the transfer of the downward reestimate in Year 2 was for the same amount as was accrued.  However, if there was a difference in the amount of the downward reestimate in Year 2, the difference would be treated similarly to negative subsidy (please see appendix III).  If the executed/funded downward reestimate was for an additional amount it would reflect a debit to USSGL account 579100 and credit to 619900 in the Program Fund; debits to USSGL accounts 139900, 577600, 461000 and credits to USSGL accounts 579100, 101000, 490200 in the Financing Fund; and debits to USSGL accounts 101000, 599300 and credits to USSGL accounts 577500, 298500 in the General Fund Receipt Account (the signs would be reversed if the amount was lower).

**6. To record the Preclosing of General Fund Receipt Account associated with fund balance at yearend.**

**General Fund Receipt Account**

There are no budgetary entries.  The financial statement effects are to transfer the funds to Fiscal Service and reduce the liability on the Balance Sheet. Funds are swept by U.S. Treasury via  CARS.

The statements of budgetary resources would appear as shown below (for these transactions only):

**DISCRETIONARY PROGRAM**

**(Resulting from Downward Re-estimate Transactions in Year 2)**

###### **GUIDE FOR BASIC ACCOUNTING AND REPORTING**

**FOR DIRECT LOAN PROGRAMS**

**WITHOUT COLLATERAL**

**IN FEDERAL CREDIT PROGRAM**

**APPENDIX 2**

# 

# APPENDIX 3: NEGATIVE SUBSIDY

**1.  To record authority after law is passed.**

***Financing Fund***

**

**2.  To record apportionment.****

***Financing Fund***

**3.  To record allotment.**

***Financing Fund***

**4.  The agency obligates a $1,000 loan with a negative 8% subsidy rate (80).****

***Financing Fund***

****

**Transaction 5A and 5B should be done simultaneously.**

**5A.  To borrow funds from Treasury~~~~**

***Financing Fund***

**5B.  To record disbursements to borrower $500.**~~~~

***Financing Fund***

**5C.  To record negative subsidy disbursement (New TCs).**

***Program Fund***

***Financing Fund***

***General Fund Receipt Account***

**Preclosing Entry**

**6.**To record the closing of General Fund receipt accounts associated with fund balance at yearend

***General Fund Receipt Account***

****

**YEAR 1**

###### **GUIDE FOR BASIC ACCOUNTING AND REPORTING**

**FOR DIRECT LOAN PROGRAMS**

**WITHOUT COLLATERAL**

**IN FEDERAL CREDIT PROGRAM**

**APPENDIX 3**

# 

**For the 1st Quarter ended September 30, Year 1**

## 

**As of 1st Quarter September 30, Year 1**

**For the 1st Quarter ended September 30, Year 1**

**For Fiscal Year Ended September 30, FY-1**

###### **GUIDE FOR BASIC ACCOUNTING AND REPORTING**

**FOR DIRECT LOAN PROGRAMS**

**WITHOUT COLLATERAL**

**IN FEDERAL CREDIT PROGRAM**

**APPENDIX 3**

# 

**Closing Entries**

1. **To record consolidation of actual resources.**

2. **To record paid delivered orders to total actual resources.**

3. **To record the closing of borrowing authority.**

4. **To record the closing of revenue, expense, and other financing source accounts to cumulative results of operations.**~~~~

**YEAR 1-**

###### GUIDE FOR BASIC ACCOUNTING AND REPORTING     ****

###### FOR DIRECT LOAN PROGRAMS 

**WITHOUT COLLATERAL**

**IN FEDERAL CREDIT PROGRAM**

**APPENDIX 3**

# APPENDIX 4: REFERENCES

This appendix lists some key references and web sites for readers who want to obtain additional information.

**OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET**

· OMB Circular A-129, Policies for  Federal Credit Programs and Non-Tax Receivables Accounting and Auditing Policy Committee Technical Release

· OMB Circular A-136, *Financial Reporting Requirements*

· OMB Circular A-11, *Preparation, Submission, and Execution of the Budget*

· OMB Credit Model

	Office of Federal Financial Management (202) 395-3993

	Website: www.whitehouse.gov/omb 

**FEDERAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS ADVISORY BOARD**

Statement of Federal Financial Accounting Standards (SFFAS) No.  1, *Selected Assets and Liabilities*

· SFFAS No.  2, *Accounting for Direct Loans and Loan Guarantees*

· SFFAS No.  18, *Amendments to Accounting Standards for Direct Loans and Loan Guarantees*

· SFFAS No.  19, *Technical Amendments to Accounting Standards for Direct Loans and Loan Guarantees*

· Technical Release No.  3: *Preparing and Auditing Direct Loan and Loan Guarantee Subsidies Under the Federal Credit Reform Act*

· Technical Release No.  6: *Preparing Estimates for Direct Loan and Loan Guarantee Subsidies Under the Federal Credit Reform Act*

· FASAB Staff at (202) 512-7350

· Website: www.fasab.gov

**TREASURY BUREAU OF THE FISCAL SERVICE**

· *U.S.  Standard General Ledger* (codified in *Treasury Financial Manual*)

· USSGL Staff at (202) 874-7418

· Website: https://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/fsreports/ref/ussgl/ussgl_home.htm

· TFM Chapter 2-4600 Treasury Reporting Instructions for Credit Reform Legislation

**TREASURY BUREAU OF THE FISCAL SERVICE**

· Federal Investment Borrowings Branch; (304) 480-7488

· Website:  www.treasurydirect.gov

###### **GUIDE FOR BASIC ACCOUNTING AND REPORTING**

**FOR DIRECT LOAN PROGRAMS**

**WITHOUT COLLATERAL**

**IN FEDERAL CREDIT PROGRAM**

**APPENDIX 4**

# APPENDIX 5:  CREDIT REFORM SUBCOMMITTEE

###### **GUIDE FOR BASIC ACCOUNTING AND REPORTING**

**FOR DIRECT LOAN PROGRAMS**

**WITHOUT COLLATERAL**

**IN FEDERAL CREDIT PROGRAM**

**APPENDIX 5**

Leon H Fleischer, Chair	SBA

Rachel Beasely		TREASURY

Patricia Brown		USDA

Alfred Buck		USAID

Angela Carroll		USDA

Adam Charlton		 Fiscal Service

Barbara J Clark 		STATE

Victoria A Crouse	DOD

Tyler Curtis		OMB

Andrea David		USAID

Katherine Day		DOD

Dorothy Dicks		TREASURY

Kevin Dugas		DOT

Chris Dyson		ED

Joy Elder		TREASURY

Tracy Galloway 		USDA

Margaret Gebhard	OMB

Leslie P. Godsey	SBA

Peggy Grygiel		TREASURY

Crystal Hanna		TREASURY

Pamela Heijmans	OMB

Joseph O. Henry		SBA

Robert Holliday		TREASURY

Stacy Ida		TREASURY

Loretta Jenkins		USDA

James Jordan 		USDA

Kim Klein		DOE

Angela Klevorn		USDA

Rhonda Knolhoff	USDA

Stacy Kolweier		USDA

John S. Kushman	SBA

Amanda Lammering	USDA

Cloretta Lewis		USDA

Terri Martin		OPIC

Jennifer Magrath	USDA

Sean McMahon		ED

Robert A. Montgomery 	SBA

Michelle Murphy	VA

Mary Onofrio		NOAA

Eileen Parlow		SEC

Mike K. Peterson	SBA

Steve D. Ramey		SBA

Jill Reeves		TREASURY

Alice Rice		DOD

Chantha Seng		USDA

Michael Smith		FCC

Jill Stalnaker		TREASURY

Nora Stein		OMB

Yong Sun		HUD

Lindsey Syron		USDA

Teresa Tancre		OMB

Greg Thebeau		USDA

James White		HUD

William Willer		USDA

Kam Yu		USDA