alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-51012

Summary Calendar

MICHAEL C. SMART

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Defendant-Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas, El Paso

USDC No. 3:10-00132

Before KING, BENAVIDES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges..

PER CURIAM:

*

Michael Smart has filed a series of pro se lawsuits against federal

agencies, officers, and employees. The instant appeal is from the dismissal of his

cause of action based upon res judicata. Smart asserts general conclusions with

very little detail and makes no references to the record. It is clear, however, that

the nucleus of this suit is the same as the previous case that was dismissed by

a district court in our circuit and affirmed by this Court on appeal. The district

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

March 3, 2011

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-51012 Document: 00511400201 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/03/2011
No. 10-51012

court correctly determined that res judicata applied and dismissed the claim

herein. This appeal is DISMISSED as frivolous.

2

Case: 10-51012 Document: 00511400201 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/03/2011
----

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on the Communication from the Commission: Cohesion Policy in Support of Growth and Jobs: Community Strategic Guidelines, 2007-2013

COM(2005) 299 final — SEC(2005) 904

(2006/C 185/11)

On 5 July 2005 the European Commission decided to consult the European Economic and Social Committee, under Article 262 of the Treaty establishing the European Community, on the abovementioned proposal.

The Section for Economic and Monetary Union and Economic and Social Cohesion, which was responsible for preparing the Committee's work on the subject, adopted its opinion on 23 March 2006. The rapporteur was Mr Vever.

At its 426th plenary session, held on 20 and 21 April 2006 (meeting of 21 April 2006), the European Economic and Social Committee adopted the following opinion by 47 votes to 0 with one abstention.

1.   Summary

2.   Introduction

3.   Observations on the challenges for cohesion policy 2007-2013

4.   Observations on the priorities for cohesion policy 2007-2013

5.   Comments on the resources for cohesion policy 2007-2013

6.   Comments on integration in national and regional policies

7.   Comments on the involvement of the socio-occupational actors

Brussels, 21 April 2006

The President

of the European Economic and Social Committee

Anne-Marie SIGMUND

----

(1)  EESC Opinions on the Funds (general provisions), Cohesion Fund and European Regional Development Fund, OJ C 255 of 14.10.2005, pages 79, 88 and 91.

(2)  EESC Opinion: OJ C 255 of 14.10.2005, p. 76.

(3)  EESC Opinion on the Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament — Building our common future: Policy challenges and budgetary means of the enlarged Union 2007-2013, OJ C 74 of 23.3.2005, p. 32.

(4)OJ C 125 of 27.5.2002, p. 100.

(5)  EESC Opinion on the Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on services in the internal market, OJ C 221 of 8.9.2005, p. 113.

(6)  See point 4.3.3.

(7)  Information Report of the Section for the Single Market, Production and Consumption on the Current state of co-regulation andself-regulation in the Single Market.

(8)  See EESC opinion on Modern Industrial Policy, OJ C 110, 9.5.2006.

(9)OJ C 10 of 14.1.2004, p. 21.

----
# C_2017038EN.01000702.xml

| 6.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/7

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats Amsterdam (Netherlands) lodged on 31 October 2016 — A, S v Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie

(Case C-550/16)

(2017/C 038/10)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Rechtbank Den Haag, zittingsplaats Amsterdam

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: A, S

Applicants:

Defendant: Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

In matters relating to family reunification for refugees, must the term ‘unaccompanied minor’, within the meaning of Article 2(f) of Council Directive 2003/86/EC (1) of 22 September 2003 on the right to family reunification, also cover a third-country national or stateless person below the age of 18 who arrives on the territory of a Member State unaccompanied by an adult responsible by law or custom and who:

1

| — | applies for asylum, |
| --- | --- |

—

applies for asylum,

| — | during the asylum procedure, attains the age of 18 on the territory of the Member State, |
| --- | --- |

—

during the asylum procedure, attains the age of 18 on the territory of the Member State,

| — | is granted asylum with retroactive effect to the date of the application, and |
| --- | --- |

—

is granted asylum with retroactive effect to the date of the application, and

| — | subsequently applies for family reunification? |
| --- | --- |

—

subsequently applies for family reunification?

---

(1)  Council Directive 2003/86/EC of 22 September 2003 on the right to family reunification (OJ 2003 L 251, p. 12).

1

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JESSIE SCOTT : CIVIL ACTION

:

vs. :

: NO. 02-2778

FAIRBANKS CAPITAL et al.

O R D E R

AND NOW, TO WIT: This 4th day of Sept., 2002,

it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above action has been settled

and upon Order of the Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1(b) of the Local Rules of

Civil Procedure of this Court , it is

ORDERED that the above action is DISMISSED with prejudice, pursuant to

agreement of counsel without costs.

MICHAEL E. KUNZ, Clerk of Court

BY: 

Katherine Gallagher

 Deputy Clerk

Civ 2 (8/2000)

41(b).frm

Case 2:02-cv-02778-HB Document 7 Filed 09/04/2002 Page 1 of 1
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 14

- 00070

- CV

IN RE RUBEN VASQUEZ RELATOR

------------

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

------------



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1

------------

The co urt has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus a nd is of

the opinion that relief should be den ied. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of

mandamus is denied.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: LIVINGSTON, C.J.; MCCOY and MEIER, JJ.

DELIVERED: March 25, 2014

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4, 52.8 (d).
January 2021 to January 2022 Schedule

For Treasury-Disbursed Recurring Benefit Payments

Settlement Dates

Agency Jan’21 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan’22

OPM Office of Personnel Management

Civil Service Retirement/Annuity

1/4** 2/1 3/1 4/1 5/3** 6/1 7/1 8/2** 9/1 10/1 11/1 12/1 1/3**

RRB Railroad Retirement Board 

Railroad Retirement/Annuity

1/4** 2/1 3/1 4/1 5/3** 6/1 7/1 8/2** 9/1 10/1 11/1 12/1 1/3**

VA Department of Veterans Affairs

Compensation and Pension

12/31* 2/1 3/1 4/1 4/30* 6/1 7/1 7/30* 9/1 10/1 11/1 12/1 12/30*

SSA Social Security Administration

3rd of Month

12/31* 2/3 3/3 4/2* 5/3 6/3 7/2* 8/3 9/3 10/1* 11/3 12/3 1/3

SSA 

Cycle -2 2nd Wednesday

1/13 2/10 3/10 4/14 5/12 6/9 7/14 8/11 9/8 10/13 11/10 12/8 1/12

SSA

Cycle -3 3rd Wednesday

1/20 2/17 3/17 4/21 5/19 6/16 7/21 8/18 9/15 10/20 11/17 12/15 1/19

SSA

Cycle -4 4th Wednesday

1/27 2/24 3/24 4/28 5/26 6/23 7/28 8/25 9/22 10/27 11/24 12/22 1/26

SSI 

Supplemental Security Income

12/31* 2/1 3/1 4/1 4/30* 6/1 7/1 7/30* 9/1 10/1 11/1 12/1 12/30*

DOL-Black Lung

(Legacy Payments)

12/31* 2/3 3/3 4/2* 5/3 6/3 7/2* 8/3 9/3 10/1* 11/3 12/3 1/3

DOL – Black Lung

(New Enrollees)

1/15 2/15 3/15 4/15 5/14* 6/15 7/15 8/13* 9/15 10/15 11/15 12/15 1/14*

.

* = Settlement Date Adjusted to the Preceding Business Day

** = Settlement Date Adjusted to the Following Business Day

Prepared by the U. S. Department of the Treasury/Bureau of the Fiscal Service January 2021
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                     EXHIBIT 12


                    MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST III
                    MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING III, L.P.
                      COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO
          COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED SECURITIES DISTRIBUTIONS
                             (dollars in thousands)



                              FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED          FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                     March 31, 2006                      April 1, 2005
                           ---------------------------------  ---------------------------------
                              MERRILL LYNCH    MERRILL LYNCH     MERRILL LYNCH    MERRILL LYNCH
                                 PREFERRED       PREFERRED          PREFERRED       PREFERRED
                           CAPITAL TRUST III FUNDING III,L.P. CAPITAL TRUST III FUNDING III,L.P.
                           ----------------- ---------------  ----------------- ---------------

<S>                        <C>                 <C>            <C>               <C>

Earnings                       $ 13,531           $ 15,854        $ 13,531           $ 15,813
                               ========           ========        ========           ========


Fixed charges                  $      -           $      -        $      -           $      -

Preferred securities
 distribution
 requirements                    13,125             13,531          13,125             13,531
                               --------           --------        --------           --------

Total combined fixed
 charges and preferred
 securities distribution
 requirments                   $ 13,125           $ 13,531        $ 13,125           $ 13,531
                               ========           ========        ========           ========

Ratio of earnings to
 combined fixed charges
 and preferred securities
 distribution requirements         1.03               1.17            1.03               1.17


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

            CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Circle Group Holdings, Inc. on
Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"), I, Gregory
J. Halpern, Chief Executive Officer of the Circle Group Holdings, Inc. certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of
     Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents,
     in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
     of Circle Group Holdings, Inc.

Dated:  August 12, 2005                    /s/ Gregory J. Halpern
                                           ----------------------
                                           Gregory J. Halpern
                                           Chairman of the Board, President and
                                           Chief Executive Officer
                                           (Principal Executive Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      497,712
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                        453
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          67,633
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        73,402
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 639,200
<COMMON>                                        33,848
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      105,959
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             66,251
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 206,058
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           24,147
<PREFERRED>                                     10,819
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           171,731
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                  28,700
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                   17,000
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                         95
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                    14
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 180,636
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  639,200
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      326,084
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            16,582
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     267,182
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     283,764
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         42,320
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               2,225
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  44,545
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        16,222
<NET-INCOME>                                    28,323
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                      2,463
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   25,860
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        19,950
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       14,297
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          62,703
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $2.69
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $2.69
        

</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 99 (a)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northland Cable Television,
Inc. and Subsidiary (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, John Whetzell, Chief Executive Officer
of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;



| | (1) |  | The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 (a) or (15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m or 78(d)); and   
| | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Date: 5-15-03

|                                                                 |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/   JOHN S. WHETZELL

John S. Whetzell
Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement will be retained by Northland
Cable Television, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
---

Exhibit
23





Consent
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm








We have
issued our reports dated March 10,
2010, with respect to the consolidated financial statements, schedules,
and internal control over financial reporting included in the Annual Report of
Marine Products Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009. We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference of said
reports in the Registration Statements of the Company on Forms S-8 (File No.
333-59886, effective May 1, 2001 and File No. 333-117837, effective July 30,
2004).







/s/ Grant
Thornton LLP


Atlanta,
Georgia


March 10,
2010
24 September 2015

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE 

Washington, DC 20590

Re: Petition for Amendment to Exemption No. 12940 Issued to ISight RPV Services, LLC 

Pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and Part 11 of the Federal Aviation Regulations

(Docket No. FAA-2015-2295)

Dear Sir or Madam:

ISight RPV Services, LLC (herein referred to as ISight) was issued Exemption No. 12940 

(herein referred to as Exemption”) on September 21, 2015, allowing commercial operations of 

the Aeryon SkyRanger UAS.

ISight requests an amendment to the Exemption to allow commercial operation of the additional 

UAS shown in Appendix A, so long as such operations are conducted within and under the 

conditions of the Exemption.

All of the UAS shown in Appendix A have been previously approved under Section 333 

Exemptions. Due to this fact, ISight contends that this amendment petition is non-controversial 

and we respectfully request that it be approved summarily.

Best Regards,

Mr. Nathaniel A. Leben 

ISight RPV Services, LLC.
Appendix A: Additional UAS for Amendment to Exemption No. 12940

1. Aeryon Scout

2. AeroVironment Shrike

3. AeroVironment Puma

4. Altavian Nova F6500

5. Altavian Nova R8400

6. DJI Inspire

7. DJI Inspire 1

8. DJI Inspire 2

9. DJI Phantom 2+

10. DJI Phantom 2 Vision

11. DJI Phantom 2 Vision+

12. DJI Phantom Vision +

13. DJI Phantom 3

14. DJI Phantom FC40

15. DJI Spreading Wings S900

16. DJI Spreading Wings S1000

17. DJI Spreading Wings S1000+

18. DJI S800

19. DJI S800 EVO

20. DJI T600

21. Draganflyer Guardian

22. Draganflyer X4ES

23. Draganflyer X4P

24. Draganflyer X6

25. Lockheed Martin Desert Hawk III

26. Lockheed Martin Indago

27. Nighthawk

28. Nighthawk VTOL

29. PrecisionHawk Hawkeye Mk-III

30. PrecisionHawk Lancaster

31. Precision Lancaster MK3

32. SenseFly eBee

33. SenseFly eBee RTK

34. SenseFly eXom

35. Sensurion Magpie MP-1

36. Service-Drone Recon One

37. Trimble UX5

38. Trimble UX5 hp

39. Trimble ZX5

40. 2AgEagle

41. 3D Robotics Aero-M

42. 3D Robotics Iris
43. 3D Robotics Iris+

44. 3D Robotics X8

45. 3DRobotics Fixed Wing

46. 3DRobotics Multirotor

47. 3DRobotics Quadrotor

48. 3DR Solo

49. 3DR Spektre

50. 3DRobotics Spektre Industrial Multi-Rotor Aerial Vehicle

51. 3D Robotics Solo

52. 3DRobotics X8+

53. 3D Robotics X8-M

54. 3D Robotics Y6
Form of 8% Amended and Restated Demand Promissory Note



 Exhibit 4.15 
 AMENDED AND RESTATED DEMAND PROMISSORY NOTE 
  

			
	AMOUNT:	  	US$100,000
		
	DATE:	  	June 26, 2008

 This AMENDED AND RESTATED DEMAND PROMISSORY NOTE (the “Note”) amends and
restates, in its entirety, the Demand Promissory Note executed on June 6, 2008, by ClearPoint Business Resources, Inc. (the “Company”) in favor of TerraNova Partners L.P. (the “Lender”) in the original
principal amount of $100,000 (One Hundred Thousand U.S. Dollars) (the “Original Principal Amount”). 
 For value received,
the Company promises to pay the Lender the Original Principal Amount on demand, with an interest rate of eight percent (8%) per annum – interest to be paid quarterly. The Company shall have the right to repay this Note in shares of common
stock of the Company, at a price of $             per share (the closing price of the Company’s shares on June 26, 2008). The Company waives presentment, demand, notice of
dishonour and protest or further notice of any kind and agrees that it shall remain liable in respect of this Note as if presentment, demand, notice of dishonour and protest had been duly made or given. 
  

			
	FULL VALUE RECEIVED:
	 CLEARPOINT BUSINESS RESOURCES, INC.

		
	 By:
	 	  

	 Name:
	 	  

	 Title:
	 	  

	
	ACKNOWLEDGED AND ACCEPTED:
	 TERRANOVA PARTNERS L.P.

		
	 By:
	 	  

	 Name:
	 	  

	 Title:
EXHIBIT 32

                              WRITTEN CERTIFICATION
 OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The  undersigned  hereby  certify that the Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB for the
year ended December 31, 2003 filed by I.D. Systems, Inc. with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that information  contained in
the report fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition
and results of operations of the issuer.


                                     By: /s/ Jeffrey M. Jagid
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                           Name:  Jeffrey M. Jagid
                                           Title: Chief Executive Officer


                                     Date:  March 17, 2004


                                     By:  /s/ Ned Mavrommatis
                                          --------------------------------------
                                             Name:  Ned Mavrommatis
                                             Title: Chief Financial Officer


                                     Date: March 17, 2004
No. 53494.

protests 81367-K, etc. (New York).

#### Yardley & Co., Ltd. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of bottles the same in all material respects as those passed upon in *Griffon Importing Co.*v. *United States*(36 C. C. P. A. 121, C. A. D. 408), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
(Reap. Dec. 10963)

#### United States *v.*Volkswagen of America, Inc.

Entry No. 9995.

(Decided April 27, 1965)

*John ~W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the plaintiff.

*Sharretts, Paley & Carter*for the defendant.

Rao, Judge:

This appeal for a reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the Assistant Attorney General for the United States and counsel for the defendant herein, subject to the approval of the Court, that at the time of exportation, of such merchandise to the United States, the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade was DM. 8477.00 less 15%, less 2%, plus packing.

> The price, at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States was not higher.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the subject ease be deemed submitted on this stipulation * * *.

*636Upon the agreed facts, I find foreign value, as defined in section 402a (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, to be the proper basis for determining the value of the bearings covered by this appeal for a reappraisement and that such value is DM8477, less 15 percent, less 2 percent, plus packing.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.