alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

----

III Informazioni

Commissione

----

DIREZIONE GENERALE SALUTE E TUTELA DEI CONSUMATORI

Pubblicazione di un posto di direttore (grado AD14) (articolo 29, paragrafo 2, dello statuto)

COM/2006/10029

(2006/C 182 A/01)

Chi siamo:

direzione generale Salute e tutela dei consumatori (DG SANCO), le cui finalità, nel contesto degli obiettivi generali della Commissione, sono accrescere il potere dei consumatori, proteggere e migliorare la salute umana, garantire alimenti sicuri e sani, tutelare la salute degli animali e delle piante e promuovere un trattamento umano degli animali.

Cerchiamo:

candidati con approfondita conoscenza ed esperienza delle questioni attinenti alla politica della sanità e del benessere degli animali, compresi gli aspetti internazionali, e con ottime capacità gestionali per garantire un'efficace pianificazione e gestione delle attività e risorse della direzione. I candidati devono pertanto rispondere al seguente profilo:

I candidati devono:

Si richiama l'attenzione sul fatto che le procedure di selezione si svolgeranno unicamente in inglese, francese e tedesco. I candidati dovrebbero indicare la dimensione (organico) e la natura delle strutture di cui hanno precedentemente assicurato la gestione.

Una descrizione completa delle mansioni, i criteri di selezione e l'indicazione dei dati da fornire nella candidatura sono disponibili al seguente indirizzo:

http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/personnel_administration/working_senior_mgt_en.htm

Nomina e condizioni di impiego

Il direttore sarà selezionato e nominato dalla Commissione conformemente alle proprie procedure di selezione e reclutamento.

La retribuzione e le condizioni di impiego sono quelle previste dallo Statuto per i funzionari di grado AD14 delle Comunità europee.

Link per la presentazione della candidatura in rete:

http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/personnel_administration/seniormanagementvacancies/index_en.html

In caso di problemi tecnici, inviare un'e-mail a: ADMIN-MANAGEMENT-ONLINE@ec.europa.eu.

Il termine ultimo per l'iscrizione è fissato al 14 settembre 2006. Le iscrizioni in rete saranno chiuse alle ore 12.00 (mezzogiorno), ora di Bruxelles.

----
No. 51347.

#### Protests 47357-K, etc., of Strawbridge & Clothier (Philadelphia)

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries. The protests-were sustained to this extent.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-6911

HARRY SHAROD JAMES,

 Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

TOM BRICKHOUSE; STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA,

 Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at 

Charlotte. Frank D. Whitney, District Judge. (3:19-cv-00070-FDW)

Submitted: March 19, 2021 Decided: June 1, 2021

Before KEENAN, FLOYD, and RUSHING, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Harry Sharod James, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Harry Sharod James seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 

28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge 

issues a certificate of appealability. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional 

right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists could find the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims debatable or wrong. See Buck v. 

Davis, 137 S. Ct. 759, 773-74 (2017). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional 

right. Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012) (citing Slack v. McDaniel, 529 

U.S. 473, 484 (2000)). 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that James has not made 

the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the 

appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
Part 2 DRAFT Fiscal Year 2025 Reporting 

SUPPLEMENT Section VII 

U.S. Standard General Ledger 

Closing Edits Detail Report 

Bulletin No. 2024-03 DRAFT VII CER - 1 IRC Handout 2/15/24

Edit Rule Number: 21 

Rule Name: Fiscal Year Budgetary Closing Edit 

Description: The amount for the current fiscal year beginning USSGL accounts must equal the amount for the 

GTAS calculated beginning balances. 

Rule Type: CL: Closing Edits 

Operand: Equal (=) 

Fatal Period: 01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 11, 12 

 

Closing Rule Number: 21.420100 

Closing USSGL Account: 420100 Total Actual Resources - Collected 

Calculated Preclosing Balance 420100 Beginning Balance 

USSGL Account 

Number Begin/End Indicator Authority Type Code 

USSGL Account 

Number Begin/End Indicator 

413810 E P 420100 B
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

TOLEDO MACK SALES & :

SERVICE, INC., : CIVIL ACTION

:

Plaintiff, : NO. 02-4373

:

v. :

:

MACK TRUCKS, INC., :

:

Defendant. :

______________________________________________________________________________

MACK TRUCKS, INC., :

:

Counterclaim Plaintiff, :

:

v. :

:

TOLEDO MACK SALES & :

SERVICE, INC., :

:

Counterclaim Defendant. :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 12 day of September, 2006, upon consideration of th

Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff Mack Trucks, Inc.’s Motion in Limine to strike the expert

report and to exclude the trial testimony of Frank M. Gollop (Docket No. 93), and all responses

filed thereto, and after oral argument having been held, it is hereby ORDERED that said Motion

is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 

BY THE COURT:

 s/ Ronald L. Buckwalter, S. J. 

RONALD L. BUCKWALTER, S.J.

Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 117 Filed 09/13/2006 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit
        32.2**
 
 CERTIFICATION
        PURSUANT TO
 18
        U.S.C.
        SECTION 1350,
 AS
        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
        connection with the Annual Report of Independence Lead Mines Company (the
        "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended December 31, 2007, as filed
        with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
        I, Wayne L. Schoonmaker, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify,
        pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
        the
        Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 
 1.
        The
        Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
        the
        Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.
        The
        information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
        the financial condition, and results of operations of the Company.
 
 The
        foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
        pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of
        Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not
        to be
        incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before
        or
        after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in
        such
        filing.
 
 /s/
        Wayne L. Schoonmaker
 Principal
        Accounting Officer
 
 Dated:
        October 15, 2008
No. 62512.

#### Manca, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 320123-K (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of parts of photographic cameras similar in all material respects to the merchandise involved in *Manca, Inc.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 271, C. D. 1874), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          54,116
<SECURITIES>                                    24,742
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,817
<ALLOWANCES>                                       155
<INVENTORY>                                        133
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                90,319
<PP&E>                                           7,110
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,971
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 104,355
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,587
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           151
<OTHER-SE>                                      82,264
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   104,355
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                50,075
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                33,487
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   150
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  25
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 18,558
<INCOME-TAX>                                     6,776
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             11,782
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    11,782
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .85
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .84
        

</TABLE>
Part 1 

SUPPLEMENT

Fiscal Year 2014 Reporting

Section V

Bulletin No. 2015-03 Draft V-88 IRC Handout December 2, 2014

Line

No.

USSGL

Acct. USSGL Account Title Begin/

End

Debit/

Credit

Reimb 

Flag

Apport 

Cat

Auth 

Type 

Code

Avail 

Time

BEA 

Cat

Borrow 

Source

Fed/Non

Fed

Year 

of BA

PY 

Adj

Reduction 

Type

TAS 

Status

Trans. 

Code

Fund Type Financing 

Account 

Code

Debit Credit Addl. 

Info.

1011

1011 417600 Allocation Transfers of Prior-Year Balances E D P/S F X U/E X/K/N EC/EG/EM/EP/ER/ES/ET/T N + -

1011 419000 Transfers - Prior-Year Balances E D P/S F X U X/K/N EC/EG/EM/EP/ER/ES/ET/T N + -

1011 419000 Transfers - Prior-Year Balances E D S F X U K/N EP G + -

1011 419600 Balance Transfers-In - Expired to Expired E D P/S X E K/N EC/EG/EM/EP/ER/ES/ET/T N + -

1811

1811 417000 Transfers - Current-Year Authority E D S M F X U X/K/N EC/EG/EM/EP/ER/ES/ET/T N + -

1811 417000 Transfers - Current-Year Authority E D S M F X U K/N EP G + -

1811 417500 Allocation Transfers of Current-Year Authority 

for Noninvested Accounts

E D S M F X U X/K/N EC/EG/EM/EP/ER/ES/ET/T

R

N + -

1811 419300 Balance Transfers - Unobligated Balances - 

Legislative Change of Purpose

E D S M F X U X/K/N EC/EG/EM/EP/ER/ES/ET/T

R

N + -

Spending authority from offsetting collections 

transferred from other accounts

Unobligated balance transferred from other accounts

USSGL Crosswalk - SF 133: Report on Budget Execution and
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE: ASBESTOS PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

This document relates to:

 : CIVIL ACTION

02-4363 RONEY : NO. MDL 875

02-4409 HAMMOND :

02-4410 GRESH :

02-4411 GEARINGER :

02-4413 BRASSILL :

02-4414 FYE :

02-4415 SEARFOSS :

02-4416 SMITH :

02-4479 SMALL :

02-4480 MEYER :

02-4608 BINDER :

02-4658 BINDER :

02-4659 BOULOUS :

02-4730 NEES :

02-4753 CUTHBERT :

02-4754 WILLIAMS :

02-4841 BROWN :

02-5164 WHELAN :

02-5165 MENTZER :

02-5317 MCELHINEY :

02-5318 DELGAUDIO :

02-5319 WAGNER :

02-5891 WALSH :

02-5892 BRAUN :

02-5893 WAGNER :

02-5894 DELGADIO :

O R D E R

The Court having been advised that the issues raised in

each of these actions are also presently pending before the

Honorable District Court Judge Alfred Wolin. Judge Wolin has

been specially designated to sit in the District of Delaware and

preside over these matters. Further, the Judge has set a

schedule and will proceed appropriately. In the interest of

judicial economy and for a prompt resolution of all outstanding

issues this Court will hold its action in abeyance and await the

ruling by the Bankruptcy Court.

Case 2:02-cv-04413-MK Document 5 Filed 08/09/2002 Page 1 of 2
IT IS THEREFORE THE ORDER OF THIS COURT that all

pending motions for abstention and remand are denied without

prejudice at this time with leave to renew at a later date. The

cases are administratively dismissed, subject to reinstatement

following the determination of the bankruptcy issues by Judge

Wolin and any subsequent appeals thereto.

Done this 9th day of August, 2002.

 BY THE COURT

 

Charles R. Weiner, SJ

Case 2:02-cv-04413-MK Document 5 Filed 08/09/2002 Page 2 of 2
Part 1

SUPPLEMENT

DRAFT 

ID

Simple or

 Special Name Type Description Error Message 

99 SPECIAL

USSGL Reimbursable Flag "R" Restriction Compound

The use of some USSGL accounts with Reimbursable Flag "R" is limited to specific TAS.

This TAS is not permitted to report spUSSGL accounts with Reimbursable "R". 

100 SPECIAL

Restricted Use of USSGL accounts 415100 and 415700 on Expired TAS Compound

Reporting USSGL accounts 415100 and 415700 on expired TAS is restricted to specific TAS.

This TAS is not permitted to report Uaccounts 415100 or 415700. 

101 SPECIAL

Main Account 3608 USSGL Restrictions Compound

TAS with Main Account 3608 are only permitted to report specific USSGL accounts.

USSGL account is not valid for TAS wMain Account 3608. 

102 SPECIAL

Main Account 3609 USSGL Restrictions Compound

TAS with Main Account 3609 are only permitted to report specific USSGL accounts.

USSGL account is not valid for TAS wMain Account 3609. 

103 SPECIAL

Main Account 3610 USSGL Restrictions Compound

TAS with Main Account 3610 are only permitted to report specific USSGL accounts.

USSGL account is not valid for TAS wMain Account 3610. 

104 SPECIAL

Restricted Use of specific USSGL accounts with Reimburseable Flage "R" and Financing Account Indicator "G" Compound

Reporting some USSGL accounts with Reimburseable Flage "R" and Financing Account Indicator "G" is restricted to specific TAS.

This TAS is not permitted to report soUSSGL accounts with Reimburseable "R". 

U.S. Standard General Ledger

Data Validations - Summary

Bulletin No. 2019-14 DRAFT VII VSR - 1
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 2 Filed 10/27/2003 Page 1 of 7
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 2 Filed 10/27/2003 Page 2 of 7
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 2 Filed 10/27/2003 Page 3 of 7
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 2 Filed 10/27/2003 Page 4 of 7
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 2 Filed 10/27/2003 Page 5 of 7
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 2 Filed 10/27/2003 Page 6 of 7
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 2 Filed 10/27/2003 Page 7 of 7
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 20-1394

___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v. Antonio McNichols, also known as Heavy Cuz lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Little Rock

____________ Submitted: June 9, 2020 Filed: June 12, 2020 [Unpublished]

____________ Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and BENTON, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. Antonio McNichols appeals after the district court 1 revoked his supervised release and sentenced him to term of imprisonment within the advisory sentencing

1 The Honorable James M. Moody, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.guideline range. His counsel has moved for leave to withdraw, and has filed a brief

challenging the sentence as unreasonable. After careful review of the record, we conclude that the district did not abuse its wide discretion in sentencing McNichols. See United States v. Miller, 557 F.3d 910, 915-18 (8th Cir. 2009) (standard of review). The record reflects that the district court properly considered factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), see United States v. Gray, 533 F.3d 942, 943 (8th Cir. 2008); there is no indication that the district court overlooked a relevant factor, gave significant weight to an improper or irrelevant factor, or committed a clear error of judgment in weighing relevant factors, see United States v. Larison, 432 F.3d 921, 923 (8th Cir. 2006); and the sentence is below the statutory limit, see 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3). Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and affirm the judgment.

______________________________

-2-
# sec5_sbr_2022

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2021-20	&"Arial,Bold"&10V SBR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"&10IRC Handout August 18, 2021
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that true and correct copies of the foregoing Attorney Defendants’

Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion For Leave to File an Amended Complaint Or, In The

Alternative, Defendants Motion To Dismiss Count III of Plaintiffs’ Proposed Amended

Complaint, with Memorandum of Law in Support and proposed forms of Order(s), were served

today via first class mail to all counsel of record at the addresses listed below:

Robert P. Brand, Esquire

1200 Walnut Street, 5th Floor

Philadelphia, PA 19107

Anthony Baratta, Esquire

Baratta & Russell, P.C.

The Loft at Mount Jolly

2661 Huntingdon Pike

Huntingdon Valley, PA 19006

 

WILLIAM F. McDEVITT

Dated: 

Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 35-6 Filed 01/16/2003 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA EX REL. : CIVIL ACTION

MARY JEAN BROWN and KEVIN WAITE :

and on behalf of :

THE STATES OF CALIFORNIA, DELAWARE, :

THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, FLORIDA, :

HAWAII, ILLINOIS, LOUISIANA, :

MASSACHUSETTS, NEVADA, TENNESSEE, :

TEXAS and VIRGINIA :

:

v. : 

:

CAREMARKPCS f/k/a ADVANCEPCS, INC., :

a direct subsidiary of Caremark Rx, :

Inc. : NO. 02-9236

ORDER

AND NOW, this 9th day of September, 2005, the court having

approved a Settlement Agreement in the above case which includes a

Corporate Integrity Agreement between the Office of Inspector

General of the Department of Health and Human Services and Advance

PCS, and a Consent Order of Court for Injunction and Settlement,

and certain compliance reports being required therein, it is

ORDERED that:

Defendant shall file with the court, under seal, copies of all

compliance reports when they are filed with the United States

under:

1. The Corporate Integrity Agreement between the Office of

Inspector General of the Department of Health and Human

Services, and AdvancePCS, and 

2. The Consent Order of Court for Injunction and Settlement.

/s/ Norma L. Shapiro 

 

Norma L. Shapiro, S.J.

Case 2:02-cv-09236-NS Document 114 Filed 09/13/05 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

REV. MARTIN FRY : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. :

:

MIDDLETOWN TOWNSHIP, et al. : NO. 02-2780

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 13th day of February, 2003, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s Motion to

Compel Disclosures Required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26, in which Plaintiff asserted that Middletown

Township had filed no responses to its discovery requests, and Defendant Middletown

Township’s response thereto, in which it represents that it has now served discovery responses, it

is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Disclosures, docketed in this case as

Document No. 20, is DISMISSED AS MOOT without prejudice to Plaintiff’s right to file a

further motion based on the content of the responses, if necessary.

BY THE COURT:

___________________________________

JACOB P. HART

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:02-cv-02780-MK Document 22 Filed 02/13/2003 Page 1 of 1
# C_2018392EN.01002901.xml

| 29.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 392/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 392/29

---

Order of the General Court of 30 May 2018 — PJ v EUIPO — Erdmann & Rossi (Erdmann & Rossi)

(Case T-664/16) (1)

((EU trade mark - Representation by a lawyer who is not an independent third party with regard to the applicant - Replacement of a party to the proceedings - Transfer of the rights of the EU trade mark applicant - Representation by a lawyer who is not an independent third party with regard to the applicant for replacement - Inadmissibility))

(2018/C 392/36)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: PJ (represented by: S., lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Hanne, and subsequently by A. Söder, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: Erdmann & Rossi GmbH (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: H. Kunz-Hallstein and R. Kunz-Hallstein, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 July 2016 (Case R 1670/2015-4), relating to invalidity proceedings between Erdmann & Rossi and PJ.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action shall be dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action shall be dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | There is no need to adjudicate on the application for replacement. |
| --- | --- |

2.

There is no need to adjudicate on the application for replacement.

| 3. | PJ is to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

PJ is to pay the costs.

| 4. | [Y]-GmbH, and each party, is to bear its own costs relating to the application for replacement. |
| --- | --- |

4.

[Y]-GmbH, and each party, is to bear its own costs relating to the application for replacement.

---

(1)  OJ C 70, 6.3.2017.

---
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 20 22

- 1821

_____________________________
J UAN R AMON N AVA , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Liberty County

. George S. Reynolds , Judge

. February 21, 2024

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
L EWIS , N ORDBY , and T ANENBAUM , JJ., concur

.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Jessica J. Yeary, Public Defender, Tyler K. Payne, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Virginia Chester Harris, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.