alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
G‐Invoicing Implementation Timeline for

Enterprise Resource Planning and Software Providers

SAP

For More Information

SAP conducts regular meetings with customers to provide/obtain information related to

this development initiative. For questions relating to SAP’s support for your Agency

please first contact your Agency’s SAP GINV Point of Contact (PoC). Your Agency’s SAP

GINV PoC is the first line of communication for information from SAP to share with

stakeholders inside your organization, as well as the point person responsible to

facilitate FAQs and meetings with SAP on behalf of your organization.

Join our Working Group

For updates on SAP's G‐Invoicing project status, please join monthly calls with the FMSC

Working Group hosted by Martin Quinlan (DOI). To request / obtain access to join the

SAP Working Group calls, please contact FMSC at FMSC@fiscal.treasury.gov.
----

|   | 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended  and |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Registrant as of and for the periods presented in the    Report. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/ Lynda J. Nahra                         |
|--------|--------------------------------------------|
|   | Lynda      J. Nahra                        |
|   | President      and Chief Executive Officer |

|                   | /s/ Charles G. Baltuskonis        |
|------------------------|-----------------------------------|
|                   | Charles      G. Baltuskonis       |
|                   | Executive      Vice President and |
|                   | Chief      Financial Officer      |
| November      13, 2009 |                              |

----
----

----

III Oplysninger

Kommissionen

----

GENERALDIREKTORATET FOR SUNDHED OG FORBRUGERBESKYTTELSE

søger en direktør (lønklasse AD14) (jf. personalevedtægtens artikel 29, stk. 2)

KOM/2006/10029

(2006/C 182 A/01)

Hvem er vi?

Generaldirektoratet for Sundhed og Forbrugerbeskyttelse (GD SANCO), som i forlængelse af Kommissionens overordnede målsætninger skal øge forbrugernes indflydelse, beskytte og forbedre folkesundheden, garantere sunde og sikre fødevarer, beskytte dyre- og plantesundheden og fremme human behandling af dyr.

Hvem søger vi?

En person, der har indgående kendskab til og stor erfaring med dyresundheds- og dyrevelfærdspolitik, inkl. de internationale aspekter, og gode ledelsesevner af hensyn til en effektiv planlægning og forvaltning af direktoratets aktiviteter og ressourcer. Interesserede bør derfor have følgende profil:

Ansøgerne skal:

Eventuelt interesserede gøres opmærksom på, at udvælgelsesproceduren kun finder sted på engelsk, fransk og tysk. Det skal angives, hvor stor en afdeling (antal ansatte) og hvilken form for afdeling, man tidligere har ledet.

Nedenstående netsted indeholder en fuldstændig jobbeskrivelse samt oplysninger om udvælgelseskriterier og ansøgningsprocedurer:

http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/personnel_administration/working_senior_mgt_en.htm

Udnævnelse og ansættelsesvilkår

Direktørstillingen besættes i henhold til de gældende udvælgelses- og ansættelsesprocedurer.

Løn- og ansættelsesvilkår fremgår af personalevedtægtens bestemmelser for De Europæiske Fællesskabers tjenestemænd i lønklasse AD14.

Link til onlineansøgning:

http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/personnel_administration/seniormanagementvacancies/index_en.html

Ved tekniske problemer sendes en e-mail til: ADMIN-MANAGEMENT-ONLINE@ec.europa.eu.

Ansøgningsfristen er den 14. september 2006, kl. 12 middag (Bruxelles-tid), hvor der lukkes for onlineansøgning.

----
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2



                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

   PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

The undersigned executive officer of First BancTrust Corporation (the
"Registrant") hereby certifies that the Registrant's Form 10-KSB for the year
ended December 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained therein
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Registrant.


                                      /s/ Ellen M. Litteral
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Name:   Ellen M. Litteral
                                          Title:  Chief Financial Officer and
                                                  Treasurer


Date:  March 27, 2003
<PAGE>
                                  EXHIBIT 23.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
on Form  S-8  (Registration  No.  333-87973)  and  Form  S-3  (Registration  No.
333-82128)  of our report dated  January 30, 2003 on our audit of the  financial
statements  included in the 2002 annual  report on Form 10-KSB of I.D.  Systems,
Inc.

     We also consent to the reference to our firm under the caption "Experts" in
the Form S-3.


/s/ Eisner LLP (formerly Richard A. Eisner & Company, LLP)


New York, New York
March 24, 2003



<PAGE>
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 24-1705

___________________________ United States of America lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v. Ricky Shawn Bennett, also known as Shawn lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Central

____________ Submitted: June 27, 2024 Filed: July 2, 2024 [Unpublished]

____________ Before LOKEN, GRUENDER, and STRAS, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. Ricky Bennett appeals after the district court 1 revoked his supervised release and sentenced him to a term above the advisory Sentencing Guidelines range. His

1 The Honorable Brian S. Miller, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.counsel has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief challenging the

substantive reasonableness of the sentence. We conclude that the sentence was not an abuse of discretion. See United States v. Valure , 835 F.3d 789, 790 (8th Cir. 2016) (observing that the district court’s revocation sentencing decisions are reviewed for an abuse of discretion). There is no indication that the district court failed to consider a relevant factor, gave significant weight to an improper or irrelevant factor, or committed a clear error of judgment. See United States v. Larison , 432 F.3d 921, 923 (8th Cir. 2006) (setting forth the considerations for the substantive reasonableness of a sentence); see also United States v. Michels , 49 F.4th 1146, 1148-49 (8th Cir. 2022) (concluding that a revocation sentence above the Guidelines range was not an abuse of discretion). Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw, and affirm the judgment.

______________________________

-2-
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 1350of Chapter 63 ofTitle 18 Of The United States Code**

 

I, Steven J. Martin, the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of The ServiceMaster Company, certify that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in such Form 10-Q/A fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of The ServiceMaster Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ Steven J. Martin |
|--------|----------------------|
|   | Steven J. Martin     |
|   | August 29, 2008 |

 

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

LABORERS’ : CIVIL ACTION

:

 :

 v. :

:

 : 

MASTRO MASONERY : NO. 02-4436

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 10th day of December, 2002, in accordance with the court's

procedure for random reassignment of cases, it is hereby

ORDERED that the above-captioned case is reassigned from the calendar of

the Honorable Harvey Bartle, III to the calendar of the Honorable James Knoll Gardner.

 FOR THE COURT:

 JAMES T. GILES 

 Chief Judge

 ATTEST:

 ___________________

 MICHAEL E. KUNZ

 Clerk of Court

Case 2:02-cv-04436-JKG Document 3 Filed 12/10/2002 Page 1 of 1
Bureau of the Fiscal Service OTCnet Enhancement Request Procedures

OTCnet Enhancement Request Procedures

Overview

The Over the Counter Division welcomes insight from customers to improve the OTCnet application. It is our 

priority to ensure that the OTCnet application performs at an optimum level and meet the Agency’s over the 

counter business needs. We want to ensure that we are well informed of any new or upcoming business

needs that the OTCnet applications can assist with in future enhancements.

Process

Enhancement requests will be evaluated, and prioritized for implementation based on the enhancement’s

ability to increase efficiency, enhance the user’s experience, and improve the quality of the application. After

enhancement requests are approved for implementation they will be assigned a level of priority which is

determined based on the impact the enhancement will have on the over-all customer base; and potential 

adverse effects on system usability and performance. An announcement will be posted of all approved

enhancement requests on the OTCnet Website for reference purposes.

The table below outlines the Enhancement Request Process:

OTCnet Enhancement

Request Process

(As of June 2013) Step

1

Agency completes and submits the Enhancement Request Form to FiscalService.OTCChannel@citi.com

• Attach screenshots or reference documents to the email (if applicable)

2 All enhancement requests are logged and forwarded to the Fiscal Service

3 Fiscal Service will evaluate the enhancement request (approve or disapprove)

4

Fiscal Service submits approved enhancement request to the requirements team for review and

consideration for implementation based on level of effort needed to implement

5

The requirements team will provide recommendation to Fiscal Service noting which future release the

enhancement can be slated within (if possible)

6

Fiscal Service provides a mass communication to agencies listing what enhancement requests were

approved and the assigned priority status

7 Fiscal Service will post the approved enhancement request list on the OTCnet website

More Information

The Enhancement Request Form can be located on the OTCnet Related Resources Webpage: 

https://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/files/otcnet/OTCnet-System-Enhancement-RequestForm-12.15.2021.docx. If you have additional questions, please contact the OTCnet Customer Support 

Team at (866) 945-7920 or by email at FiscalService.OTCChannel@citi.com.
No. 57644.

#### Reuben Honig *v.*United States,

protest 205427-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the involved mefchandise consists of braids, wholly of synthetic textile, suitable for and actually used for making or ornamenting hats, bonnets, or hoods, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 49532.

#### Protest 60676-K of W. X. Huber Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

The first shipment consisted of one case containing 60 pounds of a commodity invoiced as peppermint oil, and the second shipment 66 cases containing 3,960 pounds also invoiced as peppermint oil. But it appeared from the record that the merchandise contained in the latter shipment (entry 4400) consisted of cornmint oil partially dementholized. On the record presented the claim at 12)4 percent was sustained as to the second shipment (entry 4400). *238No evidence was offered, however, establishing facts with relation to first shipment (entry 3513) but plaintiff’s counsel pointed out that it was purchased in the same city, from the same supplier, and by the same purchaser. The Government chemist reported that "The sample is Japanese peppermint oil dementholized. It is not U. S. P. oil of peppermint.” The court stated there is nothing in paragraph 58 requiring that the peppermint oil *eo nomine*provided for therein shall conform to the United States Pharmacopoeia requirements for peppermint oil. Since there was no evidence to establish that the merchandise covered by entry 3513 is not peppermint oil, it was held that the presumption of correctness attaching to the action of the collector had not been overcome and the protest was overruled to that extent.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

CANDACE RAY : CIVIL ACTION

Plaintiff, :

:

v. : NO. 02-4382

:

ABINTON TOWNSHIP :

Defendant. :

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BUCKWALTER, S.J. July 21, 2004

Plaintiff’s Counsel has renewed his motion to withdaw. Plaintiff herself has

not responded to this which involves a conflict related to the manner in which the

case should proceed.

While denying the first motion to withdraw, it now appears that the conflict

can not be reconciled.

An Order follows:

Case 2:02-cv-04382-RB Document 36 Filed 07/21/2004 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

CANDACE RAY : CIVIL ACTION

Plaintiff, :

:

v. : NO. 02-4382

:

ABINTON TOWNSHIP :

Defendant. :

ORDER

And now this 21st day of July Plaintiff’s Counsel’s Renewed Motion to

Withdraw (Docket No. 32) is GRANTED. Plaintiff Candace Ray is reminded that

while she may represent herself she must adhere to all scheduling orders presently

governing this case and applicable rule of civil procedure, local or federal.

Trial is scheduled for October 18, 2004 at 9:30 a.m. in Courtroom 14-A. 

Plaintiff Candance Ray and remaining defendants are reminded that this is a date

certain and no continuances will normally be granted.

BY THE COURT:

 

RONALD L. BUCKWALTER, S.J.

Case 2:02-cv-04382-RB Document 36 Filed 07/21/2004 Page 2 of 2
Before The Second Division,

November 24, 1953

No. 57642.

#### Roberts, Reilly & Sons *v.*United States,

protest 191290-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

Inasmuch as rule 5 of the rules of the Customs Court provides that where there is no appearance by the moving party in a case when it is called “it shall be deemed submitted and shall be decided by the court on the record as it appears therein,” the motion of the defendant was denied. However, from, an examination of the papers in the case, the court found nothing therein tending in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the decision of the collector. The protest was therefore overruled.
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 1SUPPLEMENT	&"Arial,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2022 ReportingSection VII

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2022-12	&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000DRAFT&K000000 VII ESR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout 4/20/22
(V. D. 33)

Entry No. 825926.

#### S. E. Laszlo *v.*United States

(Decided September 19, 1956)

*John D. Bode*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

WilsoN, Judge:

This matter is presently before me on a remand from a classification proceeding decided by the first division of this court in *S. E. Laszlo*v. *United States,*35 Cust. Ct. 205, Abstract 59189. The judgment entered therein stated: “* * * that the matter be remanded to a single judge in reappraisement pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d).”

The matter has been submitted for decision upon an agreed statement of facts entered into by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto.

Upon the agreed facts, I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (d)), to be the proper basis for determining the values of the involved merchandise and that such values are as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the approval of the Court, as follows:

> 1. That the merchandise consists of binoculars and leather eases which were held by the Court in *S. E. Laszlo, et al,*v. *United States,*Abstract 58737 to be subject to appraisement separately according to the value of each class of article.

> 2. That the market value or the price, at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing *453the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States was as set forth below.

> 6 x 30 Binoculars_ $7. 90

> Cases_ 0. 90

> Total_ 8. 80 plus packing.

> 8 x 40 Binoculars_$12. 75

> Cases_ 1. 20

> Total_$13. 95 plus packing.

> 3. That there was no higher foreign value.

> 4. That the instant case may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

I further find such values to be tbe dutiable values of said merchandise.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

____________________________________

:

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CRIMINAL ACTION

:

v. :

:

LARRY WATSON : NO. 05-208

___________________________________ :

ORDER

AND NOW this 19th day of August, 2011, upon consideration of Defendant, Larry

Watson’s (“Defendant”), Motion for “Modification/Reconsideration of Sentence Pursuant to

Title 18 U.S.C. § 3582(a)(1)(A)” (“Motion”) (Doc. No. 28) and the Response in Opposition

thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion is DENIED. 

BY THE COURT:

 /s/ Robert F. Kelly 

ROBERT F. KELLY

SENIOR JUDGE 

Case 2:05-cr-00208-RK Document 35 Filed 08/19/11 Page 1 of 1
Case No. 15,013.

#### UNITED STATES v. DUTCHER.

[7 Int. Rev. Rec. 122; 1 Am. Law T. Rep. U. S. Cts. 60.]

District Court, N. D. Illinois.

April, 1868.

Internal Revenue—Rectifier’s Books—Neglect to Keep.

It is not the intent of the internal revenue law [of 1866; 14 Stat. 98] that rectifiers or distillers shall be furnished with copies of the regulations and requirements thereof.

This was a libel for forfeiture of a rectifying establishment at Amboy, Ill., for neglecting to keep a book as required by the 26th section of the act of July 13,1866. The claimant’s counsel admitted that it was clearly proven to the jury that the book kept did not show all the spirits received and purchased, and sold or delivered; and Hon. Geo. C. Bates, on behalf of the defense, asked the court to charge the jury as follows; That if the jury believed from the evidence adduced that no rules and regulations for the keeping of a rectifier’s book were ever prescribed, and furnished to the claimant by the commissioner of internal revenue as are provided for in section 26 of the act of July 13, 1866, they must find for the claimant, even though the books were not kept in accordance with the statute. That if the jury believed from the evidence adduced that the claimant has actually paid the excise tax of $2 per gallon “on every proof gallon so purchased or received by him, or sold or delivered” into the office of collector of that district, so that the United States has- not been injured or defrauded in its revenue by the irregular entries in his book, that then they must find for the claimant, as they must be satisfied that his intent and purpose was, by irregular books, to defraud the revenue.

Before

DRUMMOND, District Judge.

The charge of the judge was against the positions above taken. His honor said to the jury; “The simple question.is, has there been a failure on the part of the claimant to comply with the law in section 26 of said act, in regard to keeping his books as rectifier? It is clear that it is not the intent of the law that each rectifier or distiller shall be furnished with copies of the regulations and requirements. He must take proper pains to ascertain what the rules and regulations are. He must keep the book showing the facts required in the section referred to, even though the commissioner has prescribed nothing on the subject; and that a failure to keep a correct book under circumstances which indicate that it was through intent or gross negligence, would subject the party to the penalties of both fine and forfeiture prescribed in said section.”

Verdict for the government.
----

----

I Informace

Komise

----

Směnné kurzy vůči euru (1)

22. srpna 2006

(2006/C 198/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Zdroj: referenční směnné kurzy jsou publikovány ECB.

----

----

Informace sdělené členskými státy o státních podporách poskytovaných podle nařízení Komise (ES) č. 70/2001 ze dne 12. ledna 2001 o použití článků 87 a 88 Smlouvy o ES na státní podpory malým a středním podnikům

(2006/C 198/02)

(Text s významem pro EHP)

----

----

Informace členských států o státních podporách poskytovaných podle nařízení Komise (ES) č. 70/2001 ze dne 12. ledna 2001 o použití článků 87 a 88 Smlouvy o ES na státní podpory malým a středním podnikům

(2006/C 198/03)

(Text s významem pro EHP)

----

----

Předběžné oznámení o spojení podniků

(Případ č.j. COMP/M.4215 – Glatfelter/Crompton Assets)

(2006/C 198/04)

(Text s významem pro EHP)

----

(1)Úř. věst. L 24, 29.1.2004, s. 1.

----

III Oznámení

Komise

----

Změna oznámení o nabídkovém řízení týkajícím se náhrad pro vývoz ječmene do některých třetích zemí

(„Úřední věstník Evropské unie“ C 148 ze dne 24. června 2006)

(2006/C 198/05)

Na straně 43, v hlavě III „Nabídky“, se bod 1 nahrazuje tímto:

----

----

Změna oznámení o nabídkovém řízení týkajícím se náhrad pro vývoz pšenice obecné do některých třetích zemí

(„Úřední věstník Evropské unie“ C 148 ze dne 24. června 2006)

(2006/C 198/06)

Na straně 46, v hlavě III „Nabídky“, se bod 1 nahrazuje tímto:

----
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 49 (Wednesday, March 13, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 16029-16030]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-05822]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8226]

Waiver of Restriction on Assistance to the Central Government of 
the Central African Republic

    Pursuant to Section 7031(b)(3) of the Department of State, Foreign 
Operations, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2010 (Division F, 
Pub. L. 112-74) (``the Act''), and Department of State Delegation of 
Authority Number 245-1, I hereby determine that it is important to the 
national interest of the United States to waive the requirements of 
Section 7031(b)(1) of the Act with respect to the Central African 
Republic and I hereby report the waiver of this restriction.
    This determination and the accompanying Memorandum of Justification 
shall be reported to the Congress, and the determination shall be 
published in the Federal Register.

[[Page 16030]]

    Dated: November 16, 2012.
Thomas R. Nides,
Deputy Secretary for Management and Resources.

    Editorial Note:  This document was received in the Office of the 
Federal Register on March 8, 2013.

[FR Doc. 2013-05822 Filed 3-12-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-26-P
```
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 2SUPPLEMENT	&"Arial,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2024 ReportingSection VII

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2023-11	&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000DRAFT&K000000 VII CER - &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout 8/23/23