alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 154 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 154

To amend the Small Business Act to ensure small businesses affected by 
 the onset of transmissible diseases are eligible for disaster relief.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 17, 2017

 Mr. Rubio (for himself and Mr. Nelson) introduced the following bill; 
 which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Small Business 
                          and Entrepreneurship

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Small Business Act to ensure small businesses affected by 
 the onset of transmissible diseases are eligible for disaster relief.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Small Business Relief From Disease 
Induced Economic Hardship Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    (a) In General.--Section 3(k)(2) of the Small Business Act (15 
U.S.C. 632(k)(2)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in subparagraph (C), striking the period and inserting 
        ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(D) communicable diseases for which the Federal 
        Government issues a travel alert or travel warning.''.
    (b) Applicability.--The amendment made by subsection (a) shall 
apply to a communicable disease--
            (1) for which the Federal Government issues a travel alert 
        or travel warning before, on, or after the date of enactment of 
        this Act; and
            (2) the effects of which are experienced on or after the 
        date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1537 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1537

To amend the Neotropical Migratory Bird Conservation Act to reauthorize 
                                the Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 12, 2017

 Mr. Cardin (for himself, Mr. Coons, Mr. Van Hollen, Mr. Franken, Mr. 
   Nelson, Mr. Udall, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Carper, Mr. Leahy, and Mr. 
   Portman) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Neotropical Migratory Bird Conservation Act to reauthorize 
                                the Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Migratory Birds of the Americas 
Conservation Act''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF NEOTROPICAL MIGRATORY BIRD CONSERVATION ACT.

    Section 10 of the Neotropical Migratory Bird Conservation Act (16 
U.S.C. 6109) is amended to read as follows:

``SEC. 10. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.

    ``(a) In General.--There is authorized to be appropriated to carry 
out this Act $6,500,000 for each of fiscal years 2018 through 2023.
    ``(b) Use of Funds.--Of the amounts made available under subsection 
(a) for each fiscal year, not less than 75 percent shall be expended 
for projects carried out at a location outside of the United States.''.
                                 <all>
```
Part 1

SUPPLEMENT

Fiscal Year 2014 Reporting

Section VI

T/L S2 14-01 DRAFT VI-1 IRC Handout April 22, 2014

Line

No.

USSGL

Acct. USSGL Account Title Begin/End Fed/NonFed Reporting Type Code Recip. Cat. Addl. Info.

2.2 132100

Unfunded FECA Benefit Contributions 

Receivable E N U

2.7 161000

Investments in U.S. Treasury Securities Issued 

by the Bureau of the Fiscal Service E N E/U 2

2.7 161100

Discount on U.S. Treasury Securities Issued by 

the Bureau of the Fiscal Service E N E/U 2

2.7 161200

Premium on U.S. Treasury Securities Issued by 

the Bureau of the Fiscal Service E N E/U 2

2.7 161300

Amortization of Discount and Premium on U.S. 

Treasury Securities Issued by the Bureau of the 

Fiscal Service E N E/U 2

2.10 162000

Investments in Securities Other Than the Bureau 

of the Fiscal Service Securities E N E/U 5

2.10 162100

Discount on Securities Other Than the Bureau of 

the Fiscal Service Securities E N E/U 5

2.10 162200

Premium on Securities Other Than the Bureau of 

the Fiscal Service Securities E N E/U 5

2.10 162300

Amortization of Discount and Premium on 

Securities Other Than the Bureau of the Fiscal 

Service Securities E N E/U 5

2.10 169000 Other Investments E N E/U 5

2.10 199000 Other Assets E N E/U 5

3.10 161000

Investments in U.S. Treasury Securities Issued 

by the Bureau of the Fiscal Service E Z E/U 2

3.10 161100

Discount on U.S. Treasury Securities Issued by 

the Bureau of the Fiscal Service E Z E/U 2

3.10 161200

Premium on U.S. Treasury Securities Issued by 

the Bureau of the Fiscal Service E Z E/U 2

3.10 161300

Amortization of Discount and Premium on U.S. 

Treasury Securities Issued by the Bureau of the 

Fiscal Service E Z E/U 2

9.1 540500 Unfunded FECA Benefit Revenue E F/N U

9.1 540600

Contra Revenue for Unfunded FECA Benefit 

Revenue E F/N U

USSGL Crosswalk - Reclassified Balance Sheet
Part 1

SUPPLEMENT

Fiscal Year 2014 Reporting

Section VI

T/L S2 14-01

DRAFT VI-2 IRC Handout April 22, 2014

Footnotes and Additional Information

1. For Reciprocal Category (RC) detail information, see TFM Volume I, Part 2, Chapter 

4700, Agency Reporting Requirements for the Financial Report of the United States 

Government, Appendix 7.

2. Related to Government Account Series securities purchased using deposit funds.

3. FASAB recognizes amounts returned to Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands as nonFederal 

custodial liabilities as referenced in SFFAS No. 7, paragraph 289.

4. Does not include derivative assets.

5. Related to investments in derivative assets.

6. Does not include derivative liabilities.

7. Related to derivative liabilities.

8. Exclude General Fund (Trading Partner code 9900) activity in this account.

9. Report only General Fund (Trading Partner code 9900) activity associated with this 

account. With the implementation of GTAS (http://fms.treas.gov/gtas/index.html), there will 

be a new Federal/NonFederal attribute domain value "G" for the General Fund.

10. This line now includes amounts previously captured on line 7.9. If a new RC is 

established, then the data will be segregated.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1472 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1472

         To reauthorize the Tennessee Civil War Heritage Area.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 29, 2017

  Mr. Alexander (for himself and Mr. Corker) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
         To reauthorize the Tennessee Civil War Heritage Area.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REAUTHORIZATION OF THE TENNESSEE CIVIL WAR HERITAGE AREA.

    Section 208 of division II of the Omnibus Parks and Public Lands 
Management Act of 1996 (Public Law 104-333; 110 Stat. 4248; 127 Stat. 
420; 128 Stat. 314; 129 Stat. 2551) is amended by striking ``2017'' and 
inserting ``2021''.
                                 <all>
```
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 1SUPPLEMENT	&"Arial,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2023 ReportingSection VII

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2023-04	&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000DRAFT &K000000VII VDR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout 2/15/23
# C_2018190EN.01002802.xml

| 4.6.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 190/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.6.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 190/28

---

Order of the General Court of 9 April 2018 — Make up for ever v EUIPO — L’Oréal (MAKE UP FOR EVER)

(Case T-320/16) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Application for a declaration of invalidity - Withdrawal of the application for a declaration of invalidity - No need to adjudicate))

(2018/C 190/50)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Make up for ever (Paris, France) (represented by: C. Caron, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Bonne and D. Hanf, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: L’Oréal SA (Paris) (represented by: S. Micallef, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 March 2016 (Case R 985/2015-5) relating to invalidity proceedings between L’Oréal and Make up for ever.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | Make up for ever and L’Oréal SA shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Make up for ever and L’Oréal SA shall bear their own costs and shall each pay half of the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

---

(1)  OJ C 296, 16.8.2016.

1

---
Exhibit 32.2

                 Statement of Chief Financial Officer Furnished
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      The undersigned, Gary F. Hoskins, is the Chief Financial Officer of
Citizens South Banking Corporation (the "Company").

      This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the
Company of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2004 (the "Report").

      By execution of this statement, I certify that to the best of my
knowledge:

            A)    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
                  U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and

            B)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
                  covered by the Report.

      This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so
that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that this
statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.


August 9, 2004                                   /s/ Gary F. Hoskins
--------------------                             -------------------------------
Dated                                            Gary F. Hoskins
                                                 Chief Financial Officer


                                       23
April 3, 1961

No. 65417.

Suit 5050.

#### Morris Friedman *v.*United States.

C.D. 2174. Appeal dismissed February 7,1961.
Donald C. Gadbury, Director, National TRU Prograni 

Carlsbad Field Office oPFiee Or 

Departmetit of Energy AiRANORAOiAnoN 

P.O. Box 3090 

Carlsbad: NM 88221 

Dear Mr. Gadbury: 

We received your letter dated July 10, 2007, requesting the Environmental Protection 

Agency's (EPA's) concurrence on the draft recertifieation letter the Carlsbad Field Office 

(C13F0) plans to issue to the Central Characterization Project (CCP) at the Los Alamos National 

Laboratory (LANL). 'I'his request is in accordance with the CBFO procedures that are intended 

to ensure that the Department of Energy's (DOE) Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) site 

certifications correlate appropriately with EPA approvals for waste cbaracterization activities at 

DOE transuranic (TRU) waste generator sites. 

In May 2006, EPA performed a baseline inspection of LANL CCP's TRU waste 

charaeterization program (EPA-LANL-CCP-06.05-08) for compliance with EPA reguiations as 

required by the 40 CFR 194.8 (69 FR 42571-42583). On June 21, 2007, EPA issued a final 

inspection report and a letter approving several aspects of the LANL CCP waste characterization 

program (BPA Air poeket No. A-98-49, Item II-A4-88). 

Upon review of the draft recertification letter for LANL CCP, EPA determines that it 

appropriately authorizes characterization and certification of TRU contact-handled, retrievablystored solids (S3000), and contaet-handled, retrievably-stored debris (S5000) and Off Site 

Recovery Program (OSRP) sources packaged as newly generated debris (S5000) waste at LANL 

CCP. The EPA limitations concerning the TRU waste eharacterization program for CH 

retrievably-stored and newly-generated wastes contained in EPA's June 21, 2007, approval letter 

remain applieable and are appropriately included in Attachment 4 of your site recertification. 

We concur that the waste characterization equipment, procedures and waste streams 

encompassed in your draft recertification letter for LANL CCP agree with EPA's existing 

approvals at the site. 

Thank you for providing us with an opportunity to review the draft recertification letter 

for LANL CCP. Ifyou have any questions or eoncerns, please contact Ed Felteorn (202-343- 

9422). 

Sincerely, 

~~ ~ 

Tom Peake, Acting Director 

Center for Federal Regulations 

iniemet Address (UftL) > hflp://www.eaa.gov 

8ecyeled/Recyelable , Printetl wHh Vegetzbie Oii Sased Inks on Recycled Paper (Minimum 30% Postconsumer) 
cc: Lloyd Piper, CBFO 

Vernon Daub, CBFO 

Casey Gadbury, CBFO 

Courtland Fesmire, CBFO 

Norma Castaneda, CBFO 

Martin Navarrete, CBFO 

 Dennis Miebls, CBFO 

Allison Pangle, CTAC 

Wayne T,edford, CTAC
No. 53987.

#### Leon Meyer, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 150304-K (B), 150304-K (C), and 150550-K (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Case 2:02-cv-20143-HB Document 11-2 Filed 05/21/2004 Page 1 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-20143-HB Document 11-2 Filed 05/21/2004 Page 2 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-20143-HB Document 11-2 Filed 05/21/2004 Page 3 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-20143-HB Document 11-2 Filed 05/21/2004 Page 4 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-20143-HB Document 11-2 Filed 05/21/2004 Page 5 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-20143-HB Document 11-2 Filed 05/21/2004 Page 6 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-20143-HB Document 11-2 Filed 05/21/2004 Page 7 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-20143-HB Document 11-2 Filed 05/21/2004 Page 8 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-20143-HB Document 11-2 Filed 05/21/2004 Page 9 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-20143-HB Document 11-2 Filed 05/21/2004 Page 10 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-20143-HB Document 11-2 Filed 05/21/2004 Page 11 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-20143-HB Document 11-2 Filed 05/21/2004 Page 12 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-20143-HB Document 11-2 Filed 05/21/2004 Page 13 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-20143-HB Document 11-2 Filed 05/21/2004 Page 14 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-20143-HB Document 11-2 Filed 05/21/2004 Page 15 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-20143-HB Document 11-2 Filed 05/21/2004 Page 16 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-20143-HB Document 11-2 Filed 05/21/2004 Page 17 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-20143-HB Document 11-2 Filed 05/21/2004 Page 18 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-20143-HB Document 11-2 Filed 05/21/2004 Page 19 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-20143-HB Document 11-2 Filed 05/21/2004 Page 20 of 20
No. 55175.

#### Marine By-Products Corp. *v.*United States,

protests 695201-G, etc. (Seattle).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

When the protests were called for trial counsel for the plaintiff offered in evidence the special report of the appraiser in answer to each protest. Each of the said reports and the letter of the collector transmitting each protest identified the merchandise as “kelp meal.” Since both the appraiser and the collector considered the imported substance to be kelp meal, the claim for free entry under paragraph 1705 was sustained, following *Centennial Flouring Mills Co. et al.*v. *United States*(29 C. C. P. A. 264, C. A. D. 200). *United States*v. *Geo. S. Bush & Co., Inc., et al.*(35 C. C. P. A. 124, C. A. D. 381) cited.
Case No. 9,011.

#### MANDEVILLE v. JAMESSON.

[1 Cranch, C. C. 509.]1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

July Term, 1808.

Insolvency — Benefit of Act — Petition of CltEDITOIt.

Upon the petition of a creditor of an insolvent debtor to deprive him of the benefit of the insolvent act [2 Stat. 239], the defendant may show that the petitioner is not his creditor.

This was a petition to deprive the defendant of the benefit of the insolvent law, filed under the seventh section, upon an allegation that the defendant had given a preference to one of his creditors in a deed to La Mar, in trust to pay a debt due Margaret Jamesson in Ireland.

Mr. Jones, for defendant.

Upon the insolvency of the defendant, this property was all given up to his trustee. If the deed be void, there was no preference given. An abortive attempt to give a preference is not within the meaning of the law. The words are. “assigned or conveyed any part of his property to give a preference to any creditor or creditors;” “or of having given any preference as aforesaid.” 2 Stat. 239. There must be a disposition, or lessening of his property. A conveyance means a legal and valid conveyance, whereby the property passes.

CRANCH, Chief Judge,

suggested a doubt whether the defendant should be permitted to go into proof that the petitioner is not a creditor, supposing it to be a matter to be decided ex parte at the time of the insolvent's application, and that prima facie evidence is sufficient.

THE COURT, however,

(DUCKETT, Circuit Judge, absent,)

went into an examination of the evidence, and was of opinion that the petitioner was a creditor, and that the deed was made with intent to give a preference.

But THE COURT, by the consent of the parties, continued the cause to the next term.
# C_2018094EN.01002101.xml

| 12.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/21

---

Judgment of the General Court of 30 January 2018 — Przedsiębiorstwo Energetyki Cieplnej v ECHA

(Case T-625/16) (1)

1

((REACH - Fee payable for registration of a substance - Reduction granted to SMEs - Error in the declaration relating to the size of the undertaking - Decision imposing an administrative charge - Cessation of production of the substance - Criteria for calculation of the administrative charge - Recommendation 2003/361/EC - Legal certainty - Legitimate expectations - Proportionality - Equal treatment))

(2018/C 094/27)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Przedsiębiorstwo Energetyki Cieplnej sp. z o.o. (Grajewo, Poland) (represented by: T. Dobrzyński, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (represented initially by: E. Maurage, J.-P. Trnka and M. Heikkilä, and subsequently by: J.-P. Trnka and M. Heikkilä, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application on the basis of Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment, firstly, of ECHA Decision SME(2016) 2851 of 23 June 2016, finding that the applicant did not fulfil the conditions for the fee reduction provided for in respect of medium-sized enterprises and imposing an administrative charge on it; secondly, of the invoices Nos 10058238 and 10058239 issued by ECHA and annexed to Decision SME(2016) 2851; and, thirdly, of ECHA’s Management Board Decision MB/43/2014 of 4 June 2015 amending Decision MB/D/29/2010, as amended by Decision MB/21/2012 on the classification of services for which charges are levied.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Przedsiębiorstwo Energetyki Cieplnej sp. z o.o. to pay the costs, including those of the interim proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Przedsiębiorstwo Energetyki Cieplnej sp. z o.o. to pay the costs, including those of the interim proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 402, 31.10.2016.

1

---
EXHIBIT 23











CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-156601), Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-160020), Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-128256), Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-122701), Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-75346), and Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-159986) of The Phoenix Companies, Inc. of our report dated March 1, 2010 relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.







/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Hartford, Connecticut

March 1, 2010
:404791-1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

 

:

:

MARA FLAMM, : CIVIL ACTION

:

Plaintiff, :

: NO. 02-4302

v. :

:

SARNER & ASSOCIATES, P.C. and :

JOSHUA SARNER, ESQUIRE and :

LEONARD SARNER, ESQUIRE and :

JODI H. BROWN, M.D. and JOHN :

MATUSAVAGE, :

:

Defendants. :

 :

ORDER

And now, this day of , 2003, upon consideration of Attorney

Defendants' Motion For Leave To File A Sur-Reply Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiff's

Motion to Amend Complaint and Motion to Dismiss Count III of the Plaintiff's Proposed

Amended Complaint, it is hereby ORDERED and DECREED that said Motion for Leave is

GRANTED.

 

, J.

Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 42-3 Filed 02/19/2003 Page 1 of 1
# sec5_sbr_2021

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2022-04	&"Arial,Bold"&10V SBR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"&10December 1, 2021 IRC Handout
# IFO Template & Rules

&"Calibri"&11&K000000NONCONFIDENTIAL // EXTERNAL&1#		

# Version Log

&"Calibri"&11&K000000NONCONFIDENTIAL // EXTERNAL&1#	&"Calibri,Bold"&11SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED 	

&"Calibri,Bold"&11&K000000SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED
No. 58936.

protests 177155-K, 179003-K, and 179014-K (Buffalo).

#### C. J. Tower & Sons *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of beef similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Swift & Company et al.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 212, C. D. 1655), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 58910.

protests 955899-G, etc. (New York).

#### Oscar Feldman, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of lambskin plates the same in all material respects as those the subject of *A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 1643), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Ford, J., concurred.

Mollison, J.,

dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1643, *supra.*