alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      32.1




Certification
      of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350 adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002.




In
      connection with the annual report of IEC Electronics Corp., (the "Company")
      on
      Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007 as filed with Securities
      and Exchange Commission on the day hereof (the "Report"), I, W. Barry Gilbert,
      Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Brian H. Davis, Chief Financial
      Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1.)
      The
      report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2.)
      The
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:
                November 15, 2007
            /s/
                W. Barry GilbertW.
                Barry GilbertChairman
                andChief
                Executive Officer/s/
                Brian H. DavisBrian
                H. DavisVice
                President, Chief FinancialOfficer
                and Controller





1
No. 51649.

#### Protests 496029-G, etc., of Gimbel Bros., Inc., Delaware (New York).

Opinon by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is.the same-in all material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). In accordance therewith the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**Certification**

 

I, Gary C. Loraditch, President of BCSB Bancorp, Inc., certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of BCSB Bancorp, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsiblefor establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: April 6, 2005
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 23

- 00496

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF Z.K.M.W. , a Child

From the 57th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2022

- PA

- 00462

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor , Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE ALVAREZ

, JUSTICE CHAPA , AND JUSTICE VALENZUELA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s Order of Termination

is AFFIRMED. No costs of appeal are assessed against appellant because she is indigent.

SIGNED September 20, 2023.

_____________________________ Lori I. Valenzuela, Justice
Before the First Division,

March 6, 1946

No. 50921.

#### Protests 93813-K, etc., of Alfred Dunhill of London, Inc. (New York).

*234Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

At the trial no testimony was submitted by either ■of the parties, it being agreed that the merchandise consists of pieces of ferrocerium ¡the same as the articles the subject of *Davies Turner & Co.*v. *United States*(13 Cust. Ct. 190, C. D. 893), except for size. In accordance therewith it was held ithat the merchandise is ferrocerium, dutiable at $2 per pound and 25 percent ad valorem under paragraph 302 (q), as claimed.
Part 1

SUPPLEMENT

DRAFT 

Number Name Description

Fatal/Proposed

Analytical Type

Applicable SMAF Attribute

/ Domain Value Left Side Label 

490

Proposed Edit 49 Replacement

The BETC balances from the Central Accounting and Reporting System (CARS) that represent all the normal warrant activity should equal the sum of USSGL accounts 411100, 411200, 411500, 411700, 411800, and 411900. Statement Line / SMAF All USSGL 

500

Proposed Edit 50 Replacement

The BETC balances from the Central Accounting and Reporting System (CARS) that represent all the normal warrant activity should equal the sum of USSGL accounts 310600 and 310100. Statement Line / SMAF All USSGL 

900

Budgetary Resources Derived from Available Special and Trust Fund Receipt Accounts

The total End balance for USSGL 411400 must equal the balance for BETCs related to collections to available receipts in CARS. Statement Line / SMAF All USSGL 

910

Budgetary Resources Derived from Unavailable Unappropriated Special and Trust Fund Receipt Accounts

The sum of the ending balances in USSGL accounts 411300, 438700, and 438800 must equal the balance of BETCs related to Unappropriated Special and Trust Funds in CARS. Statement Line / SMAF All USSGL 

U.S. Standard General Ledger

Data Edits - Summary Report

Draft Bulletin No. 2017-06 VII ESR - 1
Exhibit 13.1

Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States
Code), each of the undersigned officers of América Móvil, S.A. de C.V., a sociedad anónima de capital variabileorganized under the laws of Mexico (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers
knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 (the Form 20-F) of the
Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |                                        |  |                                   
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------
|Dated: June 30, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ Daniel Hajj Aboumrad              
|                     |  |  |  | Name:                                  |  | Daniel Hajj Aboumrad              
|                     |  |  |  | Title:                                 |  | Chief Executive Officer           
|                     |  | 
|Dated: June 30, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ Carlos José García Moreno Elizondo
|                     |  |  |  | Name:                                  |  | Carlos José García Moreno Elizondo
|                     |  |  |  | Title:                                 |  | Chief Financial Officer           

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
América Móvil and will be retained by América Móvil and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1422 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat certain farming 

business machinery and equipment as 5-year property for purposes of 

depreciation. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 22, 2017 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR (for herself, Mr. ROBERTS, and Mr. TESTER) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat certain farming business machinery and equipment as 5- 

year property for purposes of depreciation. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Agriculture Equipment 

5 and Machinery Depreciation Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. CERTAIN FARMING BUSINESS MACHINERY AND 

7 EQUIPMENT TREATED AS 5-YEAR PROPERTY. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Clause (vii) of section 

9 168(e)(3)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1422 IS

1 amended by striking ‘‘the original use of which commences 

2 with the taxpayer after December 31, 2008, and which 

3 is placed in service before January 1, 2010’’ and inserting 

4 ‘‘the original use of which commences with the taxpayer 

5 after the date of the enactment of the Agriculture Equip6 ment and Machinery Depreciation Act’’. 

7 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

8 this section shall apply to property placed in service after 

9 the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1404 

To amend the Natural Gas Act to provide for expanded natural gas exports. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 21, 2017 

Mr. CRUZ introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to 

the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Natural Gas Act to provide for expanded 

natural gas exports. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Natural Gas Export 

5 Expansion Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. NATURAL GAS EXPORTS. 

7 (a) FINDING.—Congress finds that expanding nat8 ural gas exports will lead to increased investment and de9 velopment of domestic supplies of natural gas that will 

10 contribute to job growth and economic development. 


SSpencer on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1404 IS

1 (b) NATURAL GAS EXPORTS.—Section 3(c) of the 

2 Natural Gas Act (15 U.S.C. 717b(c)) is amended— 

3 (1) by inserting ‘‘or any other nation not ex4 cluded by this section’’ after ‘‘trade in natural gas’’; 

5 (2) by striking ‘‘(c) For purposes’’ and insert6 ing the following: 

7 ‘‘(c) EXPEDITED APPLICATION AND APPROVAL

8 PROCESS.— 

9 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—For purposes’’; and 

10 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

11 ‘‘(2) EXCLUSIONS.— 

12 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Any nation subject to 

13 sanctions or trade restrictions imposed by the 

14 United States is excluded from expedited ap15 proval under paragraph (1). 

16 ‘‘(B) DESIGNATION BY PRESIDENT OR

17 CONGRESS.—The President or Congress may 

18 designate nations that may be excluded from 

19 expedited approval under paragraph (1) for rea20 sons of national security. 

21 ‘‘(3) ORDER NOT REQUIRED.—No order is re22 quired under subsection (a) to authorize the export 

23 or import of any natural gas to or from Canada or 

24 Mexico.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
The OTC Kiosk Tablet

Fiscal Service has developed a Kiosk Tablet for agencies who collect check

and credit/debit transactions. This new service assists agencies that have 

customers coming into their agency location to submit in-person check and 

card payments and have medium to low volume transactional volumes. 

What is the OTC Kiosk Tablet? 

The OTC Kiosk Tablet is a production-ready point of sale (POS) system 

similar to a slimmed down version of the typical self-standing kiosks you see 

today at most retail establishments. The OTC Kiosk Tablet enables customers to make check (both 

personal and non-personal) and card payments (credit, debit, and gift cards) with minimal input from other 

user roles. 

What are the benefits of using the OTC Kiosk Tablet? 

• Streamline their over-the-counter services by offering customers the option to self-complete check and 

card transactions

• Minimize long lines to the counter

• Maximize check and card collections in remote locations

• Expand payment options to customers

Features of the OTC Kiosk Tablet 

• Microsoft Surface Pro Tablet and stand

• Dedicated check scanner, card processing 

terminal, and printer for Kiosk Tablet 

• Touch screen interface

• Receipt printing capability

• Kiosk lockdown security software ensures a safe, 

tamper proof experience Direct interface with 

OTCnet for Check Payments, Card Payments,

and batch and monitoring 

What Training is Available to Assist my Agency? 

Training will be provided to your team in advance of the pilot and will include:

• Quick guides – Short, task-oriented guides that provides high-level summary of instructions with 

accompany graphics to enable users to perform specific tasks in real-time.

• Placard – An easily accessible, highly visible display of key information to guide check scanning for 

customers.

• On-the-Job Training (delivered on site) – On-site training delivered by utilizing the quick guides to 

educate staff on how to complete specific user role tasks; provide instruction on how to collect user 

experience feedback.

• Survey – A data collecting method to establish a user experience baseline.

For questions about the Kiosk Tablet, contact:

Reginald McKinney | Reginald.McKinney@fiscal.treasury.gov

Ava Singleton | Ava.Singleton@fiscal.treasury.gov

OTCnet Deployment Team | fiscalservice.otcdeployment@citi.com
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-8001

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

GREGORY BENJAMIN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge.

(CR-01-62-JFM; CA-04-2799-JFM)

Submitted: September 19, 2005 Decided: October 5, 2005

Before SHEDD and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregory Benjamin, Appellant Pro Se. Kwame Jangha Manley, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Gregory Benjamin seeks to appeal the district court’s

order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. The order is not

appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate

of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the

denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000).

A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable

jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and

that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are

also debatable or wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322,

336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v.

Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently

reviewed the record and conclude that Benjamin has not made the

requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
No. 60005.

#### Trefflichs Bird & Animal Co. *v.*United States,

protest 260448-K (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of live birds (Senegal finches) similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Alfred Mazer*v. *United States*(25 Cust. Ct. 67, C. D. 1265), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 64066.

protest 59/20617 (New York).

#### Home Lines Agency, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

The protest was dismissed.
Order entered September 17, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01655-CV

LULLY'S INC. D/B/A/ THE RIGHT ONE, Appellant

V.

MELANIE MATTOON, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 14th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-03363

ORDER

The Court has before it appellant’s September 13, 2013 agreed motion to extend 

abatement of appeal. The Court GRANTS the motion and ORDERS that this appeal remain 

abated for 180 days from the date of this order.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                     EXHIBIT 12


                    MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST III
                    MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING III, L.P.
                      COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO
          COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED SECURITIES DISTRIBUTIONS
                             (dollars in thousands)



                              FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED          FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                     MARCH 26, 2004                      MARCH 28, 2003
                           ---------------------------------  ---------------------------------
                              MERRILL LYNCH    MERRILL LYNCH     MERRILL LYNCH    MERRILL LYNCH
                                 PREFERRED       PREFERRED          PREFERRED       PREFERRED
                           CAPITAL TRUST III FUNDING III,L.P. CAPITAL TRUST III FUNDING III,L.P.
                           ----------------- ---------------  ----------------- ---------------

<S>                        <C>                 <C>            <C>               <C>

Earnings                       $ 13,531           $ 15,778        $ 13,531           $ 15,794
                               ========           ========        ========           ========


Fixed charges                  $      -           $      -        $      -           $      -

Preferred securities
 distribution
 requirements                    13,125             13,531          13,125             13,531
                               --------           --------        --------           --------

Total combined fixed
 charges and preferred
 securities distribution
 requirments                   $ 13,125           $ 13,531        $ 13,125           $ 13,531
                               ========           ========        ========           ========

Ratio of earnings to
 combined fixed charges
 and preferred securities
 distribution requirements         1.03               1.17            1.03               1.17


</TABLE>
090079.31202/21114414v1 1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

____________________________________

:

SUNGARD FINANCIAL SYSTEMS INC. :

:

Plaintiff, : CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-CV-4332

:

v. :

:

J.B. OXFORD & COMPANY : 

:

Defendant. :

___________________________________ :

PROPOSED SCHEDULING ORDER 

AND NOW, this 28th day of February, 2003, Plaintiff SunGard Financial

Systems Inc. (“SunGard”) and Defendant J.B. Oxford & Company

(“Defendant”), by and through undersigned counsel, propose the following

scheduling order for discovery in this matter as follows:

1. The parties suggest the following discovery deadlines:

a. Deadline for written discovery requests: 09/30/2003

b. Close of discovery: 10/31/2003

2. The parties suggest the following deadlines for expert report(s):

a. Plaintiff expert report(s) due: 10/31/2003

b. Defendant expert report(s) due: 11/30/2003

3. The parties shall notify the Court if a stay of the discovery deadlines

will facilitate settlement.

Case 2:02-cv-04332-RK Document 14 Filed 03/05/2003 Page 1 of 2
090079.31202/21114414v1 2

By: _______________________ By: ___________________________

James T. Smith, Esquire Mark Stewart, Esquire

Michael E. Adler, Esquire Ballard Spahr Andrews & In Blank Ro gersolme LLP l, LLP

 1735 Market Street, 51st Floor

One Logan Square Philadelphia, PA 19103-7599

Philadelphia, PA 19103 215-665-8500

215-569-5500

Attorneys for Plaintiff SunGard Attorneys for Defendant J.B. Oxford &

Company

Financial Systems Inc.

SO ORDERED BY THE COURT:

____________________________

J.

March 5, 2003

Case 2:02-cv-04332-RK Document 14 Filed 03/05/2003 Page 2 of 2
<Page>
                                                                    Exhibit 32.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

   The undersigned, Ronald J. Ivans, Chief Financial Officer of the managing
owner, Prudential Securities Futures Management Inc. (the 'Managing Owner'), of
World Monitor Trust--Series C ('Series C'), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

   (1) Series C's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 27,
       2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
       hereof (the 'Quarterly Report'), fully complies with the requirements of
       Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

   (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
       material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
       Series C.

/s/ Ronald J. Ivans
------------------------------------------------------
Ronald J. Ivans
Chief Financial Officer of the Managing Owner
August 11, 2003
Case No. 6,689.

#### HOPKINS v. MENEDGER.

[See Case No. 9,289.]
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report Amendment No.1 of Westsphere Asset Corporation, Inc.  (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Douglas MacDonald, President and Principal Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:  April 26, 2006

By: /s/ Douglas MacDonald

Name: Douglas MacDonald

Title:   President (Principal Executive Officer)