alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION
                         302 OF THE SARBANES OXLEY ACT


I, Ronald Lui, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of The Art Boutique, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual
report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the
Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

<PAGE>

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in
other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to
the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date:  April 15, 2004


/s/Ronald Lui
- -----------------------
Ronald Lui, CEO
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

   PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

The undersigned executive officer of First BancTrust Corporation (the
"Registrant") hereby certifies that the Registrant's Form 10-KSB for the year
ended December 31, 2004 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained therein
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Registrant.

                                          /s/ Terry J. Howard
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Name:  Terry J. Howard
                                          Title: Chief Executive Officer and
                                                 President

Date: March 24, 2005

                                     - 44 -
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

CANDACE RAY : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. :

:

ABINGTON TOWNSHIP, et al : NO. 02-4382

SCHEDULING ORDER

AND NOW, this 21st day of November, 2002, based upon the case status

reports filed by the parties hereto, it is ORDERED:

1. All discovery in this case is to be completed by MAY 31, 2003 .

2. All dispositive motions are due five (5) days after the discovery period.

3. The case will be placed in the trial pool (published in The Legal

Intelligencer) on JUNE 30, 2003 .

4. At least seven (7) days prior to the case being listed in the pool as set

forth in paragraph 3, all parties will file their respective pretrial memorandums, which shall

include all items set forth in paragraph 8 of the Pretrial and Trial Procedures Before Judge

Ronald L. Buckwalter. A copy of the pretrial memorandums shall be sent to opposing counsel

and unrepresented parties. Unless otherwise ordered, counsel need not submit a pretrial

memorandum, if a dispositive motion is filed, until after the Court’s ruling on the motion. If

necessary, pretrial memos are due 7 days after the Court’s ruling on the motion.

5. If requested by counsel, the court will hold a pretrial conference, but no

such conference will ordinarily be scheduled in the absence of a request.

RONALD L. BUCKWALTER, J.

 BY: 

 Matthew J. Higgins

 Deputy Clerk

Case 2:02-cv-04382-RB Document 11 Filed 11/21/2002 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1 SECTION 302 CEO CERTIFICATION



CERTIFICATIONS OF ROYCE DIENER, PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND GEOFFREY ALISON, CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER, PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION

1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned officers of Intrac, Inc. (Intrac) hereby certify that (a) Intracs Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and (b) information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Intrac.



January 28, 2004



By:

/s/ ROYCE DIENERRoyce DienerPresident and Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)




January 28, 2004



By:

/s/ GEOFFREY ALISONGeoffrey AlisonChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)
No. 52913.

Suit 4604.

#### Pramette Juvenille Furniture Co. *v.*United States.

C. D. 1109 affirmed January 5, 1949. C. A. D. 398.
Exhibit
32.1




Certification
of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350 adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.




In
connection with the annual report of IEC Electronics Corp., (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010 as filed with Securities
and Exchange Commission on the day hereof (the "Report"), I, W. Barry Gilbert,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Susan E. Topel-Samek, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1.) The
report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2.) The
information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated:  November
19, 2010


/s/ W. Barry GilbertW.
      Barry GilbertChairman
      and Chief Executive Officer/s/ Susan E. Topel-SamekSusan
      E. Topel-SamekVice
      President and Chief Financial
Officer
No. 60006.

#### Air Clearance Ass’n, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 242991-K (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

The protest was dismissed.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series PublicationsPublications Prepared by NRC Contractors

# The Effects of Interface Management Tasks on Crew Performance and Safety in Complex, Computer-Based Systems (NUREG/CR-6690)

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Wednesday, March 24, 2021
Part 2

SUPPLEMENT

DRAFT 

No Name Description Rule Attribute Combination

45

 TAS Restrictions for USSGL 432000Accounts 

Restricted to HHS and SSA

USSGL 432000 isSome USSGL accounts are restricted to TAS in the Department of Health and Human Services and the Social Security Administration. Fail

USSGL ACCOUNT 

NUMBER 

=432100=433000

45E

 TAS Restrictions for USSGL 432000Accounts 

Restricted to HHS and SSA

USSGL 432000 isSome USSGL accounts are restricted to TAS in the Department of Health and Human Services and the Social Security Administration. 

AGENCY 

IDENTIFIER 

46 Restriction for Non-Federal Exceptions

Federal Non-Federal Code domain value E (Non-Federal exceptions) is restricted. Exceptions are pending OMB OGC legal 

review. Fail

FEDERAL 

NONFEDERAL 

INDICATOR 

46E Restriction for Non-Federal Exceptions

Federal Non-Federal Code domain value E (Non-Federal exceptions) is restricted. Exceptions are pending OMB OGC legal review. Fund Family 

76 USSGLs Limited to IMF

Some USSGL accounts are restricted to IMF TAS only. Fail

USSGL ACCOUNT 

NUMBER 

 =439190 

131

USSGL Accounts Restricted to Budget Object Class "4100"

Some USSGL accounts are restricted to reporting Budget Object Class "4100" only. Fail

USSGL ACCOUNT 

NUMBER

BUDGET OBJECT 

CLASS 

 =480110 <>4100  =490110 <>4100 

132

TAS Restrictions for USSGL Accounts 480110 and 490110

USSGL accounts 480110 and 490110 are restricted to specific TAS. Fail

USSGL ACCOUNT 

NUMBER 

 =480110  =490110 

U.S. Standard General Ledger

Data Validations - Detail

Bulletin No. 2023-11 DRAFT VII VDR - 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : 

 : CRIMINAL ACTION

v. : NO. 05-563

 :

JUAN COLON :

JUAN COLON : 

 : CIVIL ACTION

v. : NO. 16-3435

 :

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA :

ORDER

This 6th day of September, 2024, for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum, 

it is hereby ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence under 28 

U.S.C. §2255 (No. 05-563, ECF 189) is DENIED. There is no basis on which to issue a certificate 

of appealability. 

The Clerk is further requested to mark Civil Docket No. 16-3425 as CLOSED. 

 /s/ Gerald Austin McHugh

 United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cr-00563-GAM Document 214 Filed 09/06/24 Page 1 of 1
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 1SUPPLEMENT	&"Arial,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2023 ReportingSection VII

&"Arial,Bold"&K000000Bulletin No. 2023-02	&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000DRAFT&K000000 VII ESR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"&K000000IRC Handout 11/30/22
***Proposed Update to current Imputed Costs USSGL Account 673000 (Effective Fiscal Year 2019)***

**Account Title:**Imputed Costs

**Account Number:**673000 

**Normal Balance:**Debit 

**Definition:**~~The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) limits recognition of imputed costs to specific categories identified in OMB Circular No. A-136, "Financial Reporting Requirements," as amended.~~ The amount of costs incurred by a Federal entity for goods and services provided and paid for in total, or in part, by other Federal entities. Business-type activities, all personnel benefits, and all Treasury Judgement Fund settlements are required to be reported.  Agencies may elect to recognize imputed costs for other types of inter-entity costs.  The balance in this account must equal the balance in USSGL account 578000, "Imputed Financing Sources."

**Justification:** This account definition needs updated to reflect new guidance from SFFAS No. 55, *Amending Inter-entity Cost Provisions*, which became effective for FY19 reporting.

1 			IRC Handout 04/23/19
No. 61292.

protests 271184-K, etc. (New York).

#### Plus Computing Machines, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of key-driven calculating machines the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Plus Computing Machines, Inc.*v. *United States*(44 C. C. P. A. 160, C. A. D. 655), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# Bulletin No. 2020-15

&"Arial,Bold"&12U.S. Standard General LedgerSummary of Changes	

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2020-15	&"Arial,Bold"DRAFT &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handouts 04 23 20

# Additional Information

&"Arial,Bold"&12U.S. Standard General LedgerSummary of Changes	

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2020-15	&"Arial,Bold"DRAFT &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handouts  04 23 20
Case No. 14,419.

#### UNITED STATES v. A BOX OF DRY GOODS.

[Cited in U. S. v. The Francis Hatch, Case No. 15.158. Nowhere reported; opinion not now accessible.]
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

____________________________________ SIERRA CLUB, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Case: 1:10-cv-02112-JEB v. ) ) LISA JACKSON, in her official ) capacity as Administrator, United States ) Environmental Protection Agency, ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________) NOTICE OF LODGING Defendant Lisa Jackson, Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), with this notice lodges with the Court a proposed consent decree. The proposed consent decree which Defenda nt lodges today should not be signed or entered by the Court at this time. Pursuant to section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C. § 7413(g), the consent decree is not final and cannot be entered by the Court until the EPA Administrator provides “a reasonable opportunity by notice in the Federal Register to persons who are not named as parties or intervenors to the action” to comment in writing upon the proposed decree. After a reasonable public comment period, the EPA Administrator and the Attorney General, as appropriate, must promptly consider any written comments received. Id. If the federal government elects not to withdraw or withhold consent to the proposed consent decree, EPA will promptly file a motion that reque sts the Court to enter this Consent Decree. Respectfully submitted,
IGNACIA S. MORENO Assistant Attorney General Environment and Natural Resources Division Case 1:10-cv-02112-JEB Document 13 Filed 08/03/11 Page 1 of 2/s/ Eileen T. McDonough Environmental Defense Section Environment and Natural Resources Division United States Department of Justice P.O. Box 23896 Washington, D.C. 20026 Tel: (202) 514-3126 Facsimile: (202) 514-8865 Email: eileen.mcdonough@usdoj.gov
OF COUNSEL: Lea Anderson US EPA, Office of General Counsel Case 1:10-cv-02112-JEB Document 13 Filed 08/03/11 Page 2 of 2
Case No. 8,997.

#### MALONEY v. BUTTERLY et al.

[N. Y. Times,

April 16, 1864.]

District Court, S. D. New York.

1864.

Affreightment — Bile of Lading — Receipt bt Consignee — Representations.

[A bill of lading stating, according to representations by the shipper, the weight of cargo shipped without weighing, binds the consignee, after receipt without weighing, to pay freight for the stated weight.]

This was a libel for freight [by James Ma-loney against Peter Butterly and others].

The libelant, who was owner of the barge John Maloney, took on board her at Philadelphia a cargo of coal, to be carried to New York. The coal was put on board by the vendor, consigned to the respondents. It was not laden on board by weight, but was received by the libelant on the representation of the shipper, and the libelant signed a bill of lading -on those representations, acknowledging the receipt of 209 tons of coal on board, and agreeing to deliver it to the respondents at New York. The vessel arrived in New York, and the assignees of the bill of lading received the coal. They did not exact a measurement or weight of it as delivered from the boat, but carried it across the city to their own yard, where it was weighed, without the supervision of the carrier; and they then declared that it was six tons short, and declined to pay freight on that amount.

Mr. Donovan and Judge Whiting, for li-belant.

Mr. Brown, for respondents.

Before BETTS, District Judge.

HELD

BY THE COURT:

That a rule of greater stringency may prevail as to a purchase and sale of property than is exacted in relation to a mere bailment of it for carriage. That the vendor of the coal acted as agent or factor of the purchaser, and is reasonably bound to satisfy the carriage price to the carrier, if the consignee does not accept the consignment, and pay the agreed price at the place of destination. That the respondents are concluded from taking the defence of short weight. They are to be regarded as the factors of the consignor as well as consignees, and in that capacity to have virtually admitted and liquidated the quantity of the cargo, in relation to the freight payable to the carrier. A difference of quantity on the adjustment of the transaction between consignor and consignee must be adjusted between them. They are both to be regarded as having assented through their acts and acquiescenees to the rightfulness of the libelant’s demand as an agreed compensation for the services rendered.

Decree for the libelant for his claim, with interest.
rtsp://multimedia.mcpa.virginia.edu/911/hearing10/2004041401_low.rm
# Data

&"Calibri,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2017-16	&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000DRAFT&K01+000 VII VSR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"&10IRC Handout 12/5/17
Before the Third Division,

December 9, 1952

No. 56969.

#### Perry H. Chipurnoi *v.*United States,

protest 119036-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of coconut meat in tins the same in all material respects as that the subject of *Allied Food Corporation of America*v. *United States*(28 Cust. Ct. 222, C. D. 1412), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Case 2:05-cv-01099-ER Document 63 Filed 12/21/05 Page 1 of 20
Case 2:05-cv-01099-ER Document 63 Filed 12/21/05 Page 2 of 20
Case 2:05-cv-01099-ER Document 63 Filed 12/21/05 Page 3 of 20
Case 2:05-cv-01099-ER Document 63 Filed 12/21/05 Page 4 of 20
Case 2:05-cv-01099-ER Document 63 Filed 12/21/05 Page 5 of 20
Case 2:05-cv-01099-ER Document 63 Filed 12/21/05 Page 6 of 20
Case 2:05-cv-01099-ER Document 63 Filed 12/21/05 Page 7 of 20
Case 2:05-cv-01099-ER Document 63 Filed 12/21/05 Page 8 of 20
Case 2:05-cv-01099-ER Document 63 Filed 12/21/05 Page 9 of 20
Case 2:05-cv-01099-ER Document 63 Filed 12/21/05 Page 10 of 20
Case 2:05-cv-01099-ER Document 63 Filed 12/21/05 Page 11 of 20
Case 2:05-cv-01099-ER Document 63 Filed 12/21/05 Page 12 of 20
Case 2:05-cv-01099-ER Document 63 Filed 12/21/05 Page 13 of 20
Case 2:05-cv-01099-ER Document 63 Filed 12/21/05 Page 14 of 20
Case 2:05-cv-01099-ER Document 63 Filed 12/21/05 Page 15 of 20
Case 2:05-cv-01099-ER Document 63 Filed 12/21/05 Page 16 of 20
Case 2:05-cv-01099-ER Document 63 Filed 12/21/05 Page 17 of 20
Case 2:05-cv-01099-ER Document 63 Filed 12/21/05 Page 18 of 20
Case 2:05-cv-01099-ER Document 63 Filed 12/21/05 Page 19 of 20
Case 2:05-cv-01099-ER Document 63 Filed 12/21/05 Page 20 of 20
Part 1

SUPPLEMENT

DRAFT 

Number Name Description

Fatal/Proposed

Analytical Type

Applicable SMAF Attribute

 / Domain Value Left Side Labe

38

Budgetary USSGL Accounts and Balance Transfer BETCs "BXFERC" and "BXFERD"

The sum of Balance Transfer BETC transactions (BXFERC and BXFERD) for a TAS must equal the sum of specific USSGL accounts for that TAS.

Proposed Analytical USSGL / SMAF Account Type = EXPND

Balance Transfers Budgetary 

U.S. Standard General Ledger

Data Edits - Summary Report

Bulletin No. 2022-04 DRAFT VII ESR - 1
-                          Home                     
-                          Data Products                     
-                     Normalized Prices                

# Normalized Prices

The Economic Research Service (ERS) annually calculates "normalized prices," which smooth out the effects of shortrun seasonal or cyclical variation, for key agricultural inputs and outputs. These normalized prices are used by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the Tennessee Valley Authority, USDA's Natural Resources Conservation Service, and other Federal agencies to evaluate the benefits of resource-related projects affecting agriculture.

Since 1993, ERS has calculated normalized prices using a consistent methodology. National-level prices (in table 1) are based on 5-year lagged averages of actual market-year prices (e.g., an average of 2017–21 market prices is used to calculate normalized prices for 2022 for the 2023 ERS report year). National prices indices (in table 2) are as reported by USDA's National Agricultural Statistics Service. State-level normalized prices for the report year 2023 (in table 3) are calculated by multiplying the national-level normalized prices by the average ratios of the State-level market prices to the national market prices for 2019–21.

See the Documentation for details on data sources and methods.

- Overview
- Documentation

-  Environmental Quality 
-  Farm Practices & Management 
-  Natural Resources & Environment 

**Last updated:** Friday, September 29, 2023

**For more information, contact:**Christopher  Sichko
**Exhibit 32.2** **CERTIFICATION    PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     In connection with the Annual Report of Husky Energy Inc. (the    “Company”) on    Form 40-F    for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2006 as filed with    the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the    “Report”), I, L. Geoffrey Barlow, Vice    President & Chief Financial Officer of the Company,    certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted    pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,    that:      1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)    or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and      2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all    material respects, the financial condition and results of    operations of the Company.     Date: March 13, 2007     /s/ L. Geoffrey Barlow    L. Geoffrey Barlow    Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
# sec5_custodialact_2022

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2021-20	&"Arial,Bold"&10Draft	&"Arial,Bold"&10August 2021 IRC Meeting
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Merrill Lynch Preferred
Capital Trust III (the "Trust") and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding III, L.P.
for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Haig J. Nargesian,
Regular Trustee of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.





                              MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST III


                              By:  /s/ HAIG J. NARGESIAN
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                              Name:    Haig J. Nargesian *
                              Title:   Regular Trustee









Dated: November 9, 2005
_______________________

* Haig J. Nargesian functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
  and Chief  Financial  Officer of the Trust for  purposes  of Section  906
  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.