alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE>

                                                                   Exhibit 11
                                             INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY
                                 COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                  (In millions of dollars except for shares and per share amounts)

                                               <S>
                                               Years  ended  December 31,
                                        <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>
                                        1999          1998          1997          1996          1995
Earnings from continuing operations
  <S>                                 <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>           <C>
  applicable to common stock          $544.9        $455.5        $358.6        $324.7        $243.8
Earnings from discontinued operations
   applicable  to  common  stock      $ 46.2        $ 53.6        $ 21.9        $ 33.3        $ 26.5
Net earnings applicable
  to common stock.............        $591.1        $509.1        $380.5        $358.0        $270.3

Average number of common
  shares outstanding..........   163,644,073   163,669,777   163,206,932   161,238,547   159,103,617

Number of common shares
  issuable assuming exercise
  under incentive stock plans..    2,108,724     1,812,035     1,617,803     1,031,137       495,479
Average number of outstanding
  shares for diluted
  earnings per
  share calculations..........   165,752,797   165,481,812   164,824,735   162,269,684   159,599,096

Basic earnings per share from
  continuing operations                $3.33         $2.78         $2.20         $2.01         $1.53
Basic earnings per share from
  discontinued operations              $0.28         $0.33         $0.13         $0.21         $0.17
Basic earnings per
  share.......................         $3.61         $3.11         $2.33         $2.22         $1.70

Diluted earnings per share from
  continuing operations                $3.29         $2.75         $2.18         $2.00         $1.52
Diluted earnings per share from
  discontinued operations              $0.28         $0.33         $0.13         $0.21         $0.17
Diluted earnings per
  share........................        $3.57         $3.08         $2.31         $2.21         $1.69
</TABLE>

Note:  All common share and per share amounts have been adjusted for the 3-for-2
stock split which was made in the form of a stock dividend in August of 1997.
**INSTRUMENT PROVIDING FOR THE CESSATION OF ACCRUALSUNDER THE BANKBOSTON CORPORATION AND ITSSUBSIDIARIES DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN**

          WHEREAS, FleetBoston Financial Corporation (successor to BankBoston Corporation) (the “Company”) sponsors for the benefit of eligible employees the BankBoston Corporation and Its Subsidiaries Deferred Compensation Plan (the “VDCP”);

          WHEREAS, the Human Resources and Board Governance Committee (formerly known as the Human Resources and Planning Committee) of the Board of Directors of the Company (the “HR Committee”), by resolution adopted June 17, 1998, delegated to the General Counsel of the Company the power and authority to amend or terminate any retirement plan maintained as a result of a merger or acquisition by the Company or a subsidiary of the Company; and

          WHEREAS, the Company wishes to discontinue all future benefit accruals under the VDCP.

          NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, all deferrals, employer credits, and other credits (except for interest credits) under the VDCP shall permanently cease as of December 31, 2000.

          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Instrument has been executed by a duly authorized officer of the Company this 20th day of December, 2000.

|   | FLEETBOSTON FINANCIAL CORPORATION                                                                                                                                 |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |
|   |
|   | By:    /s/ WILLIAM C. MUTTERPERL                    |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                   |     William C. Mutterperl    Executive Vice President, General Counsel and    Secretary |
EXHIBIT 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In  connection  with the Annual  Report on Form 10-K of Saucony,  Inc. (the
"Company")  for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  the undersigned John
H. Fisher, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material respects,  the financial condition and results of the operations of the
Company.



Dated:  March 16, 2005                   /s/ John H. Fisher
                                         John H. Fisher
                                         Chief Executive Officer
II 

Calendar No. 417 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1336 

[Report No. 115–250] 

To amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to reauthorize hydroelectric production incentives and hydroelectric efficiency improvement incentives, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 12, 2017 

Mr. GARDNER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

MAY 21, 2018 

Reported by Ms. MURKOWSKI, without amendment 

A BILL 

To amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to reauthorize 

hydroelectric production incentives and hydroelectric efficiency improvement incentives, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1336 RS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Reliable Investment 

3 in Vital Energy Reauthorization Act’’ or the ‘‘RIVER 

4 Act’’. 

5 SEC. 2. HYDROELECTRIC PRODUCTION INCENTIVES AND 

6 EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENTS. 

7 (a) HYDROELECTRIC PRODUCTION INCENTIVES.— 

8 Section 242 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 

9 15881) is amended— 

10 (1) in subsection (c), by striking ‘‘10’’ and in11 serting ‘‘20’’; 

12 (2) in subsection (f), by striking ‘‘20’’ and in13 serting ‘‘30’’; and 

14 (3) in subsection (g), by striking ‘‘each of the 

15 fiscal years 2006 through 2015’’ and inserting ‘‘each 

16 of fiscal years 2018 through 2027’’. 

17 (b) HYDROELECTRIC EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENT.— 

18 Section 243(c) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 

19 U.S.C. 15882(c)) is amended by striking ‘‘each of the fis20 cal years 2006 through 2015’’ and inserting ‘‘each of fis21 cal years 2018 through 2027’’. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS

sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 417 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1336 

[Report No. 115–250] 

A BILL 

To amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to reauand for other purposes. hydroelectric efficiency improvement incentives, thorize hydroelectric production incentives and 

MAY 21, 2018 

Reported without amendment 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
-1-

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

RAMON SOTO, et al. : CIVIL ACTION

:

 v. :

 : NO. 05-1208

PHILADELPHIA HOUSING AUTHORITY, et al. :

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

The Court held a hearing on December 13, 2005 on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary

Judgment in which Plaintiffs seek relief in the form of three specific rulings. The parties have

agreed that there are no factual disputes as to the facts presented in Plaintiffs’ Motion. 

As to Plaintiffs’ first request for relief, that Philadelphia Housing Authority (“PHA”)

refrain from evicting the minor Plaintiffs, PHA has so agreed, at least during the pendency of this

case in this Court. 

As to Plaintiffs’ second request, that PHA screen Ramon Soto to determine if he is

eligible to be made head of household for the rental unit currently occupied by the minor

children, both counsel agreed at the hearing that PHA generally “screens” an individual before

making a decision as to whether that individual is eligible to be a head of household. In this case,

PHA asserts that it has discretion to deny eligibility to Ramon Soto, at least in part, because he is

not currently a PHA tenant, and making him head of household would constitute giving him a

preference over approximately 46,000 other people who are on a PHA waiting list.

The Court has reviewed the regulations cited by the parties and finds that the regulations

do not specifically address the factual situation present in this case, where the minor children

Case 2:05-cv-01208-MMB Document 25 Filed 12/16/05 Page 1 of 2
-2-

who now occupy the apartment are in somewhat of a legal limbo because their mother died and

they have no other suitable place to live. At the hearing, counsel concurred with this conclusion.

The Court, therefore, finds that there is no regulation that would prevent or prohibit PHA

from screening Ramon Soto, as a preliminary step before any final decisions are made by PHA

and/or by this Court. The third request is that PHA make Ramon Soto head of household so that

he can occupy the apartment with the minor Plaintiffs and will be denied without prejudice.

Accordingly, for the reasons stated more fully on the record at the hearing, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Court will GRANT Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, in

part, to the extent that PHA will be required to screen Ramon Soto, in accordance with its normal

screening procedures, within sixty (60) days. Counsel shall thereafter report back to the Court,

and, after discussion with Counsel, the Court will determine the need for further proceedings. 

Otherwise, Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is DENIED without prejudice.

BY THE COURT:

Date: 12/16/05 s/Michael M. Baylson 

Michael M. Baylson, U.S.D.J.

O:\CIVIL\05-1308 Soto v. PHA\Soto v. PHA - Memo Ps' MSJ.wpd

Case 2:05-cv-01208-MMB Document 25 Filed 12/16/05 Page 2 of 2
May 10, 1962

No. 66752.

#### Empire Findings Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 61/210, 61/14152, and 61/15742.

Protests abandoned March 13, 1962. (Not published.) (Initial No. 60/11012.) Plaintiff’s application for rehearing granted.
No. 50901.

#### Protests 56703-K, etc., of A. W. Fenton Co., Inc. (Cleveland).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83, decided February 5, 1945.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the *229invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries. The protests were sustained to this extent.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MARIA A. MONTEVERDE : CIVIL ACTION

:

 v. :

:

PPL ELECTRIC UTILITIES CORPORATION : NO. 02-4214

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 20th day of September2, 2002, it is Ordered that the Rule 16

Conference in the above captioned case scheduled on October 24, 2002, is RESCHEDULED to

Wednesday, October 30, 2002 at 4:30 p.m. 

ATTEST: or BY THE COURT

BY: 

 Carol D. James, Deputy Clerk MARY A. McLAUGHLIN, J.

faxed to counsel 9/20/02:

 Ian M. Ballard, Esq.

 Sidney L. Gold, Esq.

Civ 12 (9/83)

Case 2:02-cv-04214-MAM Document 6 Filed 09/20/2002 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Brian R. Ervine,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of EvolvingSystems, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31,2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Qfairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results ofoperations of Evolving Systems, Inc.

 
| /s/ BRIAN R. ERVINE                                                      |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Brian R. Ervine                                                          |
| Executive Vice  President and Chief Financial and Administrative Officer |
| May 6, 2010                                                         |

 

 

This certificationis furnished with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent requiredby such Act, be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Such certification willnot be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under theSecurities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extentthat we specifically incorporate it by reference.

 

----
# An d r ROBERT A. PLESSALA DIRECT

DIAL 713.850.4217 

### . 

# M rplessala@andrewsmyers.com HOUSTON

1 AUSTIN 

## May 14, 

### 2015 

### Via E—Filing Christopher

A. Prine, 

### Clerk 14”‘ 

### Court of 

### Appeals 301 

### Fannin

St., 21"‘ Floor 

### Houston, 

## TX 77002 RE: Court

of 

### Appeals

No. 

### 14-14-00846—CV Hector

A. 

### Espinoza



### and Elizabeth



### Sanchez,

Appellants, v. Osiel Lopez, 

### Appellee 

### Dear Mr. Prine: 

### Per your request,

please



### be advised

that 

### Robert

A. Plessala

will 

### present

oral 

### argument

on behalf

of the Appellee, Osiel

Lopez, in

the

### above-referenced 

### appeal 

### scheduled

for 

### Thursday,



## May 21, 2015, at 1:30 

## pm. Very truly yours, /s/ 

### Robert

A. Plessala 

### Robert

A. Plessala 

### RAP/bhl

Andrews

Myers

-Attorneys

at 

### Law 3900 Essex Lane, Suite 800

- Houston,

Texas 77027-5198 T 713.850.4200 F

713.850.4211 - andrewsmyers.com ACCEPTED 14-14-00846-cv FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS 5/14/2015 11:31:24 AM CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

## CERTIFICATE 

# OF SERVICE
I certify

that a true 

### and correct



### copy of the foregoing



### instrument



### was served, via e-mail 

### on the following: 

## VIA 

## EMAIL

- 

## RTOMLlNSON@LONESTARLEGAL.0RG Richard



### Tomlinson 

### Lone Star 

### Legal 

### Aid 1415 

### Fannin

Street,

Suite 

### 300 Houston, 

# TX 77002 Attorneys



### for Appellants, 

### Hector Espinoza



## and Elizabeth



### Sanchez. 

### on this the 1491 

### day of 

### May, 2015.
/s/



### Robert

A. Plessala 

### Robert

A. Plessala

4843-3450-2436 3324.0
No. 50395.

#### Protests 112950-K, etc., of Inland Sugar Co. et al. (Milwaukee, etc.).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
U.S. DEPARTMENT OFTRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, D. C. 

# FtECEIVED

IN THE MATTER OF: 

## JUL - 

## 72015 HEARING DOCKET DOCKET NO. 2015-1321 Fisher Scientific Company, LLC FAA CASE NO. 2011S0700457 Respondent Judge Richard C. Goodwin
FAA'SMOTION FOREXENTIONTO FILERESPONSE TO FISHER SCIENTIFIC LLC'sMOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT FORINSUFFICIENCYAND FOR COMPLAINANT'SVIOLATION OFRULE 208 COMES NOW the Federal Aviation Administration (hereinafter FAA), through the undersigned counsel, and requests an extension to the 14 C.P.R. 13.218(d) requirement that a response to a motion mustbe filed within 10 days after service ofa written motion. In the instant case, Fisher Scientific, LLC (hereinafter Respondent), filed a Motion to Dismiss Complaint for Insufficiency and for Complainant's'Violation of Rule 208, which was served on June 23, 2015. Per 14 C.P.R. 13.218(d), the FAA



# ~ust file aresponse byJu1y3: 2015. The FAA seeks an extension in order to effectively respond to the Respondent's motion. It should be noted that the Respondent has not filed an answer, the parties have not begun the discovery phase ofthe litigation process, and the Court has not set a hearing in this matter. As a result, the FAA submits neither the Respondent nor the Court willbeprejudicedby an extension.

. .• r. . • . '"" .
·.l-- • , r i ;·' .

**~** ,'.
'i . ( ,; . I', , <I 1 ,[- ,lWHEREFORE, the FAA seeks an extensionto August 3, 2015, to file its response to the Respondent's motion. 

# j"t 

# 12 /. Respectively

**~ed** this _,c.__, day of_-h,

**~"''--'--'J-11-Y** 

## __ ,, 2015. William Vines General Attorney Office ofthe Regional Counsel

2CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that the foregoing FAA's Motion for Extension to File a Response was sent to the following viacertified mail: Federal AviationAdministration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur WrightBuilding- Suite 2W1000 The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin Administrative Law Judge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (El1-310) Washington, DC 20590 Facsimile: (202) 366-7536 Jerry W. Cox, Esq. Potomac Strategy Associates 2729 Gallows Rd., Suite 401 Vienna, VA 22180 

# a:,



# ~~

**~** Si Office ofthe Regional Counsel Dated (and facsimile 

## IJUl

3
# C_2017144EN.01006302.xml

| 8.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 144/63 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 144/63

---

Order of the General Court of 17 March 2017 — Tri-Ocean Trading v Council

(Case T-384/16) (1)

1

(2017/C 144/97)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Fifth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 326, 5.9.2016.

1

---
USSGL Board: Ballot Items & Projects

Chris Beck and Michele Crosco, Bureau of the Fiscal Service

May 2, 2017

1

Review Ballot Items

New USSGL Accounts/Description Changes related to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the Exchange Stabilization Fund (ESF)

New USSGL Account and title change for the General Fund

New USSGL Account for DFAS

USSGL Upcoming Projects

Overview

LEAD ∙ TRANSFORM ∙ DELIVER

‹#›

10 Proposed USSGL’s for IMF and 1 Proposed deletion.

IMF reporting in compliance with P.L. 114-113 designates these funds as a means of financing, but should be reflected as budgetary resources. Several USSGL’s created in order to keep proper accounting relationships, but not crosswalk as budgetary resources (411991, 411992, 429590, 435190)

For Edit 994 (119090, 135090, 135990)

Memo lines (411993, 411994, 462091)

New USSGL’s for IMF and ESF

LEAD ∙ TRANSFORM ∙ DELIVER

‹#›

USSGL Account 426800 is being created for ESF to account for incurring negative interest on foreign investments

Definitions were expanded for 719100 and 729100 (Treasury Use Only), to account for foreign exchange rate changes

New USSGL’s for IMF and ESF

LEAD ∙ TRANSFORM ∙ DELIVER

‹#›

USSGL 591910 being proposed for the General Fund of the U.S. Government to offset the agencies use of 591900

USSGL 151600 “Operating Materials and Supplies in Development” (DOD only)

Account title changes to refer to “General Fund of the U.S. Government”

HHS being added to agencies that can use USSGL 415900

General Fund & Other Ballot Item

LEAD ∙ TRANSFORM ∙ DELIVER

‹#›

5

Custodial Activity Guidance

Reviewing Repayable Advance Guidance

Add to existing Cancelling TAS Guidance

Add to existing Buy/Sell Transaction Guidance

USSGL Upcoming Projects

LEAD ∙ TRANSFORM ∙ DELIVER

‹#›

Continue to develop General Fund guidance to improve it’s position for FY 2018 audit and reduce elimination issues with agencies.

Develop FASAB Budget Accrual Reconciliation (BAR) Guidance

Continue to leverage GTAS in developing FR Note Crosswalks

USSGL Upcoming Projects

LEAD ∙ TRANSFORM ∙ DELIVER

‹#›

# image1.png

# image3.png
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       5,939,790
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                             1,628,835
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                158,431,776
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       9,511,576
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         9,446,908
<LOANS>                                    209,095,285
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,710,096
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             411,261,967
<DEPOSITS>                                 202,147,439
<SHORT-TERM>                                82,140,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                         15,116,187
<LONG-TERM>                                 61,026,800
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        70,362
<OTHER-SE>                                  50,761,184
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             411,261,967
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              7,919,141
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            5,587,171
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            13,506,312
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           4,439,269
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           8,166,323
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        5,339,989
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              2,818,122
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (807,354)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (807,354)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.09)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.07
<LOANS-NON>                                  1,393,307
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              2,834,766
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,684,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   28,000
<RECOVERIES>                                    54,096
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,710,096
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         1,710,096
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>