alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Merrill Lynch
Preferred Capital Trust III and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding III, L.P.
(the "Partnership") for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Kathleen Skero, Controller of Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., the General
Partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Partnership.




                              MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING III, L.P.

                              By:  MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC., as General Partner


                              By:  /s/ KATHLEEN SKERO
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                              Name:    Kathleen Skero *
                              Title:   Controller, Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.








Dated: November 9, 2005
_______________________

*  Kathleen Skero functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
   and Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership for purposes of Section 906
   of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
<PAGE>
                                   EXHIBIT 11
                          Flagstar Capital Corporation
                  Computation of Net Earnings per Common Share
                      (In thousands, except per share data)


In order to calculate net earnings per share of common stock, the Company must
first subtract the dividend requirements of the Series A Preferred Shares to
arrive at net earnings available to the common stockholders. Net earnings per
share are calculated by dividing net earnings available to common stockholders
by the average number of common shares outstanding during the period.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                    For the           For the          For the             For the
                                                    quarter           quarter        nine months         nine months
                                                     ended             ended            ended               ended
                                                   September         September        September           September
                                                      30,               30,              30,                 30,
                                                      2001             2000              2001               2000
                                                  -----------       -----------      -----------         -----------
<S>                                               <C>               <C>              <C>                 <C>
Net Earnings                                      $     1,728       $     1,914      $     5,411         $     5,331
Less: preferred stock dividends                         1,222             1,222            3,666               3,666
                                                  -----------       -----------      -----------         -----------
Net income available to common stockholders       $       506       $       692      $     1,745         $     1,665
                                                  ===========       ===========      ===========         ===========

Average common shares outstanding                       1,000             1,000            1,000               1,000

Net earnings per common share                     $      0.51       $      0.69      $      1.75         $      1.66
</TABLE>


                                       13
EXHIBIT
32.2






CERTIFICATION
OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In
connection with the amended Quarterly Report of Z Trim Holdings, Inc. on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Quarterly Report”), I, Brian
Chaiken, Chief Financial Officer of Z Trim Holdings, Inc. certify, pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, thatto my
knowledge:




(1)           The
Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)           The
information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Z Trim Holdings,
Inc.




Dated:  September
      15, 2008
              By:
              /s/ Brian
      ChaikenBrian
      ChaikenChief
      Financial Officer(Principal
      Financial Officer)
December 19, 2013

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

ANDRE JAMAL SLOAN, Appellant

NO. 14-12-00514-CR V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this court holds that there was no error in the 

judgment. The court orders the judgment AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 10-4 Filed 08/05/2002 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 10-4 Filed 08/05/2002 Page 2 of 2
115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1223 

AN ACT 

To repeal the Klamath Tribe Judgment Fund Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 1223 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Klamath Tribe Judg3 ment Fund Repeal Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. REPEAL. 

5 Public Law 89–224 (commonly know as the ‘‘Klam6 ath Tribe Judgment Fund Act’’) (79 Stat. 897) is re7 pealed. 

8 SEC. 3. DISBURSEMENT OF REMAINING FUNDS. 

9 Notwithstanding any provision of Public Law 89–224 

10 (79 Stat. 897) (as in effect on the day before the date 

11 of enactment of this Act) relating to the distribution or 

12 use of funds, as soon as practicable after the date of enact13 ment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior shall dis14 burse to the Klamath Tribe the balance of any funds that, 

15 on or before the date of enactment of this Act, were appro16 priated or deposited into the trust accounts for remaining 

17 legal fees and administration and per capita trust ac18 counts, as identified by the Secretary of the Interior, 

19 under that Act (as in effect on the day before the date 

20 of enactment of this Act). 

Passed the Senate March 22, 2018. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1223 

AN ACT 

To repeal the Klamath Tribe Judgment Fund Act.
**GENERAL FUND RECEIPT (GFR) ACCOUNT GUIDE**

**Effective Fiscal 2021**

**Scenario 6 Non-Custodial Statement Collections: Collection of Downward Re-estimate of Subsidy Expense**

The goal of this section is to record in a loan program the movement of excess subsidy from the financing fund to a General Fund Receipt Account.  The Credit Reform transactions illustrated in this scenario are limited.  For detailed Credit Reform transactions, refer to the Credit Reform Case Studies at******https://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/ussgl/resources-creditreform.html****.**

Downward Re-estimate of Subsidy

If more subsidy money was collected than is necessary to fund future net cash outflows, the financing fund must relinquish the excess subsidy amount.  The financing fund must transfer the excess subsidy amount, with interest, to a designated GFR account.

**Year 1 – Quarter 1**

**Year 1 Pre-Closing Trial Balance**

**Financial Statements**

**Year 1 4th Quarter Yearend Reporting**

**Year 1 – Pre-closing Trial Balance**

**Year 1 – Pre-Closing Adjusting Entry**

**Year 1 – Pre-Closing Adjusted Trial Balance**

**Financial Statements**

**Reclassified Statements**

**Closing Entries**

**Year 1 Post-Closing Trial Balance**

**Year 2 Yearend**

****

**Year 2 Preclosing Trial Balance**

**Year 2 Preclosing Adjusting Entry**

**Year 2 Preclosing Adjusted Trial Balance**

**Financial Statements:**

**Reclassified Statements:**

**Closing Entries**

**Year 2 Post-Closing Trial Balance**

  Page **124** of **213                                                                IRC Handout July 16, 2020**
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                         YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              FEB-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 MAR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   FEB-29-2000
<CASH>                                             115,775
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       20,652
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   141,594
<PP&E>                                             213,235
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (119,076)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     258,813
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              256,750
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                           100,000
<OTHER-SE>                                               0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         2,063
<SALES>                                          5,023,389
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,023,389
<CGS>                                            2,769,813
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2,769,813
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,208,010
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    164,900
<INCOME-TAX>                                        61,880
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                103,020
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       103,020
<EPS-BASIC>                                          .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          .01



</TABLE>
# FILED FEB 0 3 2022

ELIZABETH A. BRami CUM OF 8UPROAE COMP' BY DEPUT

6- 1; IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

LINDSEY SHARRON LINDSEY LICARI, ANTEE, N/K/A No. 82887

vs. BOBBY LEE ANTEE, DEE ANTEE, Appellant,
A/K/A BOBBY
Res ondent.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL This is a pro se appeal from a district court order. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Gerald W. Hardcastle, Judge.

On May 12, 2021, the clerk of this court issued a notice directing appellant, among other things, to file and serve, by September 9, 2021, either (1) a brief that complies with NRAP 28(a) and NRAP 32 or (2) an informal brief for pro se parties on the form provided by the clerk. The notice cautioned that failure to timely file a brief could result in the dismissal of this appeal. When appellant did not comply, on September 27, 2021, this court entered an order directing appellant, by October 11, 2021, to file and serve either (1) an opening brief that complies with NRAP 28(a) and NRAP 32 or (2) an informal brief for pro se parties on the form provided by the clerk of this court. The order cautioned that failure to comply could result in the dismissal of this appeal as abandoned.

On October 12, 2021, appellant filed a motion requesting, among other things, an extension of time until November 15, 2021, to file the opening brief. The proof of service attached to the motion did not indicate that counsel for respondent was served with the motion. See NRAP

-0325(b) ("Service on a party represented by counsel shall be made on the

party's counsel."). Therefore, on November 2, 2021, this court entered an order directing appellant, by November 16, 2021, to provide proof of service of the October 12, 2021, motion on counsel for respondent. The order cautioned that if no proof of service was timely received, this court would take no action on the motion. See NRAP 25(d)(3) (stating that this court will not take action on documents filed without proof of service). Appellant disf not provide this court with proof of service of the motion on respondent's counsel. Accordingly, this court took no action on appellant's October 12, 2021, motion.

To date, appellant has not filed a brief or an informal brief or further communicated with this court. Accordingly, it appears that appellant has abandoned this appeal, and this court

ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

Hardesty


### (1 4 ir l J. Stighch Herndon

cc: Chief Judge, The Eighth Judicial District Court Hon. Gerald W. Hardcastle, Senior Judge Lindsey Sharron Antee Shum way Van Eighth District Court Clerk

2
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: MAURICE ALLEN GILBERT,

Debtor.

______________________________

MAURICE ALLEN GILBERT,

Appellant,

 v.

ROD DANIELSON, Chapter 13 Trustee,

Appellee.

No. 16-55253

D.C. No. 5:15-cv-01675-DOC

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

David O. Carter, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 14, 2016**

Before: WALLACE, LEAVY, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

Maurice Allen Gilbert appeals pro se from the district court’s order 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

DEC 21 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 16-55253 

affirming the bankruptcy court’s order dismissing his chapter 13 bankruptcy 

petition. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 158(d), 1291. We review de 

novo the district court’s decision on appeal from the bankruptcy court and apply 

the same standard of review applied by the district court. In re AFI Holding, Inc., 

525 F.3d 700, 702 (9th Cir. 2008). We affirm.

The bankruptcy court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing Gilbert’s 

chapter 13 petition because Gilbert failed to commence making payments under his 

chapter 13 plan. See 11 U.S.C. § 1326(a)(1) (“[D]ebtor shall commence making 

payments not later than 30 days after the date of the filing of the plan . . . .”); id.

§ 1307(c)(4) (a bankruptcy court may dismiss a case for “failure to commence 

making timely payments under section 1326.”); see also Leavitt v. Soto (In re 

Leavitt), 171 F.3d 1219, 1222-23 (9th Cir. 1999) (stating standard of review).

Contrary to Gilbert’s contention, the bankruptcy court properly exercised 

jurisdiction over proceedings related to Gilbert’s chapter 13 petition prior to this 

court issuing its mandate in appeal No. 15-55260. See Sherman v. SEC (In re 

Sherman), 491 F.3d 948, 967 (9th Cir. 2007) (a notice of appeal typically divests a 

bankruptcy court of jurisdiction over aspects of the case involved in the appeal but 

the bankruptcy court retains jurisdiction to implement or enforce the order and may 
3 16-55253 

exercise jurisdiction over related proceedings).

We reject as without merit Wade’s contentions that the bankruptcy court 

violated due process.

Gilbert’s motion to take judicial notice, filed June 28, 2016, is denied as 

moot.

AFFIRMED.
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 124 Filed 01/20/2005 Page 1 of 35
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 124 Filed 01/20/2005 Page 2 of 35
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 124 Filed 01/20/2005 Page 3 of 35
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 124 Filed 01/20/2005 Page 4 of 35
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 124 Filed 01/20/2005 Page 5 of 35
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 124 Filed 01/20/2005 Page 6 of 35
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 124 Filed 01/20/2005 Page 7 of 35
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 124 Filed 01/20/2005 Page 8 of 35
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 124 Filed 01/20/2005 Page 9 of 35
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 124 Filed 01/20/2005 Page 10 of 35
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 124 Filed 01/20/2005 Page 11 of 35
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 124 Filed 01/20/2005 Page 12 of 35
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 124 Filed 01/20/2005 Page 13 of 35
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 124 Filed 01/20/2005 Page 14 of 35
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 124 Filed 01/20/2005 Page 15 of 35
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 124 Filed 01/20/2005 Page 16 of 35
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 124 Filed 01/20/2005 Page 17 of 35
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 124 Filed 01/20/2005 Page 18 of 35
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 124 Filed 01/20/2005 Page 19 of 35
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 124 Filed 01/20/2005 Page 20 of 35
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 124 Filed 01/20/2005 Page 21 of 35
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 124 Filed 01/20/2005 Page 22 of 35
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 124 Filed 01/20/2005 Page 23 of 35
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 124 Filed 01/20/2005 Page 24 of 35
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 124 Filed 01/20/2005 Page 25 of 35
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 124 Filed 01/20/2005 Page 26 of 35
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 124 Filed 01/20/2005 Page 27 of 35
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 124 Filed 01/20/2005 Page 28 of 35
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 124 Filed 01/20/2005 Page 29 of 35
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 124 Filed 01/20/2005 Page 30 of 35
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 124 Filed 01/20/2005 Page 31 of 35
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 124 Filed 01/20/2005 Page 32 of 35
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 124 Filed 01/20/2005 Page 33 of 35
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 124 Filed 01/20/2005 Page 34 of 35
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 124 Filed 01/20/2005 Page 35 of 35
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The undersigned officer of Global Resource Corporation (the "Company") hereby
certifies to my knowledge that the Company's annual report on Form 10-KSB for
the year ended December 31, 2005 (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission the on date hereof, fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed to be part of the Report or "filed" for any
purpose whatsoever.


Date: July 19, 2006                Name:  /s/ Mary K. Radomsky
                                          ----------------------------
                                          Mary K. Radomsky
                                   Title: Chief Executive Officer
January 26, 1945

No. 49984.

Suit 4474.

#### *P. Silverman & Son*v. *United States.*

C. D. 827 affirmed December 11, 1944. C. A. D. 292.
```

[Congressional Bills 118th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 392 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

118th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 392

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to ensure that bonds used to 
   finance professional stadiums are not treated as tax-exempt bonds.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           February 13, 2023

  Mr. Lankford (for himself and Mr. Booker) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to ensure that bonds used to 
   finance professional stadiums are not treated as tax-exempt bonds.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No Tax Subsidies for Stadiums Act of 
2023''.

SEC. 2. NO TAX-EXEMPT BONDS FOR PROFESSIONAL STADIUMS.

    (a) In General.--Section 103(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(4) Professional stadium bond.--Any professional stadium 
        bond.''.
    (b) Professional Stadium Bond Defined.--Section 103(c) of such Code 
is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
            ``(3) Professional stadium bond.--The term `professional 
        stadium bond' means any bond issued as part of an issue any 
        proceeds of which are used to finance or refinance capital 
        expenditures allocable to a facility (or appurtenant real 
        property) which, during at least 5 days during any calendar 
        year, is used as a stadium or arena for professional sports 
        exhibitions, games, or training.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to bonds issued after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
Before the First Division,

April 1, 1953

No. 57232.

protest 159945-K (New York).

#### Geigy Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

The undisputed facts showed that the product in question is a color or .dye, soluble in water, used for blueing textiles, principally bleached cotton cloth, making it whiter, and that it is obtained, derived, ormanu-factured in whole or in part from toluene, a product provided for in paragraph 1651. The claim of the plaintiff was therefore sustained.
# Main

&"Arial,Bold"Part 1SUPPLEMENT		&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2017 ReportingSection V

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2017-06	&"Arial,Bold"V BS - &PDRAFT	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout 04/20/17

# Footnotes and Additional Inform

&"Arial,Bold"Part 1SUPPLEMENT		&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2017 ReportingSection V

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2017-06	&"Arial,Bold"V BS - &PDRAFT	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout 04/20/17