alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Before the First Division,

December 3, 1953

No. 57653.

#### Felix M. Mendelson and Hoyt, Shepston & Sciaroni et al. *v.*United States,

protests 179499-K, etc. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise and issues are the same in all material respects as those the subject of *John P. Herber & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(30 Cust. Ct. 193, C. D. 1519). In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the cited case, the protests were dismissed, and the *312matters were remanded to a single judge sitting in reappraisement for determination of the value of the merchandise in the manner provided by law (28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d)).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY

: CIVIL ACTION

:

 v. :

:

DAVID FORREST, et al. : NO. 02-4435

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of June, 2003, it is Ordered

that the Rule 16 Conference scheduled for June 5, 2003 at 4:15

p.m. is CANCELED and RESCHEDULED for Friday, June 27, 2003 at

4:30 p.m.. The conference will be held in chambers, room 7613 on

the 7th floor.

ATTEST: or BY THE COURT

BY: 

 Deputy Clerk Anita B. Brody, J.

Civ 12 (9/83)

Copies FAXED on _________ to: Copies MAILED on ____________ to:

Glenn F. Rosenblum, Esq. (via fax: 215-772-7620)

Edward P. Krugman, Esq. (c/o Mr. Rosenblum: 215-772-7620)

Edward M. Dunham, Jr., Esq. (via fax: 215-979-1020

Nicholas M. Centrella, Esq. (via fax: 215-864-9620)

Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 41 Filed 06/04/2003 Page 1 of 1
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You havereached the Federal Depository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC)Archive. This archive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC.Access to publications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of catalogingand locator services, including the Catalog of U.S. GovernmentPublications.  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the eventthat publications are no longer available from the original publishing agencysite. (Historical purposes)

**Title:**  EIA publications directory

1998, 1999

SuDoc: E 3.27:����� 
�Item Number: 0429-T-49 (online)
CGP system Number: 000516114
List of modeling files for EPA's proposed rulemaking on Arizona Regional Haze SIP, May 2013 Hayden_visibility_impacts.xlsx CALPUFF emissions and stack parameter inputs, CALPOST visibility output tables Example CALPUFF input file with emissions from ASARCO cf_Hayden_base_2001.inp Example CALPUFF input file with emissions used by WRAP cf_Hayden_wrap_2001.inp

CALPUFF modeling input and output files (available on request) These include "base" with emissions provided in ASARCO comments and "WRAP" as used in WRAP modeling, http://pah.cert.ucr.edu/aqm/308/bart.shtml, az_emis_May31_2007.xls); includes visibility impacts calculated using old and revised IMPROVE equation (methods "6" and "8"), annual average and best 20% of days for natural background (backgrounds "a" and "b"), all pollutants and PM only (e.g. "base" and "basepm"). CALPUFF .inp and .lst (1.23 MB, 12 archived files) Hayden_cpf.zip POSTUTIL .inp and .lst (52 KB, 12 archived files) Hayden_putil.zip CALPOST .inp and .lst (3.9 MB, 936 archived files) Hayden_cpost.zipx
Part 2

SUPPLEMENT

USSGL 

Acct. USSGL Account Title

Anticipated

Budg/ 

Prop

Norm 

Bal

Begin

/ End

Debit/ 

Credit

Auth 

Type 

Code

Apport 

Cat

Apport 

Cat B

Avail 

Time

BEA 

Cat

Borrow 

Source

Budgetary 

Impact 

Indicator

Cohort 

Year

Cust/ 

Noncust

Exch/ 

Nonexch

Fed/ 

Nonfed

Trading 

Prtnr

Trading 

Partner 

Main

PY

Adj DEFC

Pgm 

Rpt 

Cat

Reimb 

Flag

Year 

of 

BA

Reduction 

Type BOC Fund Type

Reporting 

Type 

Code

Financing 

Account 

Code

TAS 

Status

Trans. 

Code

417400 Transfers - Current-Year Borrowing Authority Converted to 

Cash

N B D E D/C P/X D/M F ### #### B/P/X 1 or 3 

character 

OMB 

approved 

value

D EG/EP/ES E/F/U N U/E X/K/N

439502 Authority Unavailable for Obligation Pursuant to Public Law - 

Temporary - Anticipated Current-Year Authority

Y B C E C D/P/R

/S

D/M 1 or 3 

character 

OMB 

approved 

value

D EG/EP/ER/ES/ET/TR E/F/U N U X/N

439730 Appropriations Temporarily Precluded From Obligation N B C B/E D/C D B/P/X 1 or 3 

character 

OMB 

approved 

value

D ES E/F/U N U X/N

593300 Amortization of Unearned Lessor Revenue N P C E D/C N CF/DF/EC/EG/EM/EP/ER/ES/ET/GA/TR/UG/US/UT E/F/U D/G/N U/E/C X/K/N

671300 Lessee Lease Amortization N P D E D/C N CF/DF/EC/EG/EM/EP/ER/ES/ET/GA/TR/UG/US/UT E/F/U D/G/N U/E/C X/K/N

U S S G L A C C O U N T USSGL ATTRIBUTES B U L K F I L E A T T R I B U T E S T A S A T T R I B U T E S

Fiscal Year 2024 Reporting

U.S. Standard General Ledger - Attribute Table

Section IV

Bulletin No. 2023-04 Draft

IRC Handout Feb. 15, 2023
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Championship Auto Racing Teams, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending September 30, 2004 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Christopher R. Pook, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Christopher R. Pook

Christopher R. Pook
Chief Executive Officer
November 15, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Championship Auto Racing Teams, Inc. and will be retained by
Championship Auto Racing Teams, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case 2:05-cv-04884-TR Document 96-1 Filed 06/02/09 Page 1 of 15
Case 2:05-cv-04884-TR Document 96-1 Filed 06/02/09 Page 2 of 15
Case 2:05-cv-04884-TR Document 96-1 Filed 06/02/09 Page 3 of 15
Case 2:05-cv-04884-TR Document 96-1 Filed 06/02/09 Page 4 of 15
Case 2:05-cv-04884-TR Document 96-1 Filed 06/02/09 Page 5 of 15
Case 2:05-cv-04884-TR Document 96-1 Filed 06/02/09 Page 6 of 15
Case 2:05-cv-04884-TR Document 96-1 Filed 06/02/09 Page 7 of 15
Case 2:05-cv-04884-TR Document 96-1 Filed 06/02/09 Page 8 of 15
Case 2:05-cv-04884-TR Document 96-1 Filed 06/02/09 Page 9 of 15
Case 2:05-cv-04884-TR Document 96-1 Filed 06/02/09 Page 10 of 15
Case 2:05-cv-04884-TR Document 96-1 Filed 06/02/09 Page 11 of 15
Case 2:05-cv-04884-TR Document 96-1 Filed 06/02/09 Page 12 of 15
Case 2:05-cv-04884-TR Document 96-1 Filed 06/02/09 Page 13 of 15
Case 2:05-cv-04884-TR Document 96-1 Filed 06/02/09 Page 14 of 15
Case 2:05-cv-04884-TR Document 96-1 Filed 06/02/09 Page 15 of 15
EXHIBIT 10.2
                       EXTENSION OF PROMISSORY NOTE

$14,835.00                                            Santa Ana, California
                                                          September 1, 2001

     THE UNDERSIGNED promises to pay to the order of Mezzanine Capital Ltd.
at 1516 Brookhollow Drive, Suite D, Santa Ana, CA 92705, or at such other
place as the holder hereof may designate in writing, the sum of fourteen
thousand eight hundred thirty-five dollars ($14,835.00), with interest
thereon at the rate of 10% per annum from the date of the original
promissory note, September 1, 2000.  Principal and interest shall be due
and payable one year from the date hereof.  This note shall replace the
promissory note for these funds originally due on September 1, 2001.

     Prepayment of this note may be made at any time without penalty.

     In the event of commencement of suit to enforce payment of this note,
the undersigned agrees to pay such additional sum as attorney's fees as the
court may adjudge reasonable.

                                   Alnilam Corporation

                                   By: /s/ Jason Daggett
                                   Jason Daggett, President
<PAGE>
# Sheet1

Part 1SUPPLEMENT	DRAFT	Fiscal Year 2015 ReportingSection IV

DRAFT &P of  &N	IRC Handout 8/6/15
(Reap. Dec. 10680)

Entry No. NH 382.

#### Murray H. Weiss *v.*United States

(Decided February 11, 1964)

Plaintiff not represented by counsel.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

WilsoN, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties herein:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the approval of the court, that the market value or price at the time of exportation of the merchandise involved herein, at which such or similar merchandise was offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, plus, when not included in such price, the cost of containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, is as follows:

> —40'/blue at $98 per m/t less inland freight at $6.14 per m/t

> %" — 40'/white at $95 per m/t less inland freight at $6.14 per m/t

> *%"*— 40'/green at $95 per m/t less inland freight at $6.14 per m/t

> %" — 30'/red at $100 per m/t less inland freight at $6.14 per m/t

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that there was no higher foreign value for the merchandise herein at the time of exportation.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that this case may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

*451On the agreed fact, I find 'and bold that export value, as that value is defined in section 402, as amended, is tlie proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise in question and that such value for the respective items is as follows:

> %" — 10'/blue at $98 per m/t less inland freight at $6.14 per m/t

> %" — 40'/white at $95 per m/t less inland freight at $6.14 per m/t

> *%"*— 40'/green at $95 per m/t less inland freight at $6.14 per *m/t*

> *%”*— 30'/red at $100 per m/t less inland freight at $6.14 per m/t

Judgment will issue accordingly.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

: CIVIL ACTION

MICHAEL I. SCHWARTZ

:

 v.

:

No. 02-4443

:

MARTIN D. LINGLE, et al

:

NOTICE OF ARBITRATION HEARING

Please take note that the above-captioned civil action case has been scheduled for

ARBITRATION at 9:30 am on December 18, 2002. PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS

ARBITRATION HEARING WILL BE HELD IN THE ROBERT N.C. NIX BUILDING, 900

MARKET ST., PHILADELPHIA, PA 19107. REPORT TO ROOM 339 FOR YOUR ROOM

ASSIGNMENT. NOTE: Arbitrators shall not participate in settlement discussions.

Michael E. Kunz

Clerk of Court

By: 

PATRICIA A. JONES 

Deputy Clerk

Phone:267-299-7072

Date:October 8, 2002

Copies: Pat Callahan, Courtroom Deputy to Judge Schiller

Docket Clerk - Case File

Counsel: Ronald Ervais, Esq.

Theodore P. Winicov, Esq.

ARB2.FRM

Case 2:02-cv-04443-BMS Document 8 Filed 10/08/2002 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE: ASBESTOS PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

This document relates to:

 : CIVIL ACTION

02-4363 RONEY : NO. MDL 875

02-4409 HAMMOND :

02-4410 GRESH :

02-4411 GEARINGER :

02-4413 BRASSILL :

02-4414 FYE :

02-4415 SEARFOSS :

02-4416 SMITH :

02-4479 SMALL :

02-4480 MEYER :

02-4608 BINDER :

02-4658 BINDER :

02-4659 BOULOUS :

02-4730 NEES :

02-4753 CUTHBERT :

02-4754 WILLIAMS :

02-4841 BROWN :

02-5164 WHELAN :

02-5165 MENTZER :

02-5317 MCELHINEY :

02-5318 DELGAUDIO :

02-5319 WAGNER :

02-5891 WALSH :

02-5892 BRAUN :

02-5893 WAGNER :

02-5894 DELGADIO :

O R D E R

The Court having been advised that the issues raised in

each of these actions are also presently pending before the

Honorable District Court Judge Alfred Wolin. Judge Wolin has

been specially designated to sit in the District of Delaware and

preside over these matters. Further, the Judge has set a

schedule and will proceed appropriately. In the interest of

judicial economy and for a prompt resolution of all outstanding

issues this Court will hold its action in abeyance and await the

ruling by the Bankruptcy Court.

Case 2:02-cv-04479-RB Document 2 Filed 08/09/2002 Page 1 of 2
IT IS THEREFORE THE ORDER OF THIS COURT that all

pending motions for abstention and remand are denied without

prejudice at this time with leave to renew at a later date. The

cases are administratively dismissed, subject to reinstatement

following the determination of the bankruptcy issues by Judge

Wolin and any subsequent appeals thereto.

Done this 9th day of August, 2002.

 BY THE COURT

 

Charles R. Weiner, SJ

Case 2:02-cv-04479-RB Document 2 Filed 08/09/2002 Page 2 of 2
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pane l unani m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l ar g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. AL B E R T O P I NA , D e f

e n d an t - A p p e llan t. N o. 10- 50404 D . C . N o . 2 : 9 9 - c r - 0 1 2 7 4 - R S WL ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia R ona l d S . W . L e w , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d O c t obe r25, 2011 ** B e f o r e : T R O T T , G O U L D , an dR A W L I N S O N , C ir c u it Ju d g e s . A lb e rto P in aap p e a ls f

r o m th e 3 6 0 - m o n th s e n te n c e im p o s e df o llo w in g h is conv i ct i on s f

or R ac ket ee r I nfl uenced and C orruptO rgani zat i on s c on spi ra cyun der 1 8 U . S. C. § 1 9 6 2 ( d ) , an db e i n g af e l o n i n p o s s e s s i o n o f

af i r e arm u n d e r1 8 U . S. C. § 9 2 2 ( g ) ( 1 ) . W e h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n u n d e r2 8 U . S. C. § 1 2 9 1 , an dw e a f f i rm. 

# FI LED OC T 28 2011 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS10- 50404 2 P i nac ont e nds tha thi s s e nt e nc e i s s ubs t ant i ve l yunr e a s onabl e . G i ve n the d is tr ic t c o u rt’s f

a c tu a l f in d in g s , P in a ’s lo w - e n dG u id e lin e s s e n te n c e is r e a s o n ab le i n l i ghtof

the t ot a l i tyof

the c i r c um s t anc e s and the 18 U . S . C . § 3553( a ) s e nt e nc i ng f a c to r s . See G al l

v. U ni ted States , 5 5 2 U .S . 3 8 , 5 1 ( 2 0 0 7 ) ; U ni ted States v. Stote rau , 52 4 F . 3d 98 8, 99 7 (9th C i r. 20 08 ); U . S . S . G . § 1 B 1. 3(a) (1)( B ). AF F I RME D.
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 1SUPPLEMENT	&"Arial,Bold"DRAFT	&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2016 ReportingSection VII

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2016-05	&"Arial,Bold"DRAFT VII VDR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout 4/21/16
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2016-0465 Directorate Identifier: 2015-NM-096-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered 

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Inspection 2.0 $ 170.00 $ 170.00 95 $16,150.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance: 0

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $16,150

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $0

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours 

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

$ 0.00 $0 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):
Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO 

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
No. 52921.

#### Austin Nichols & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 48686-K, etc. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

GRACE LAWRENCE 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

TRANS UNION LLC 

CITY OF PHILADELPHIA 

Defendant. 

C.A. NO: 02-CV-4440 

JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

Trans Union LLC (“Trans Union”), and Grace Lawrence (“Plaintiff”) (collectively referred 

to as the “Parties”), by and through their undersigned attorneys, jointly move for an extension of 

time of all deadlines for sixty (60) days. 

1. Plaintiff has commenced this action alleging that Defendant Trans Union violated the 

Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. '1681 et seq. (the “FCRA”) because it reported certain 

allegedly inaccurate credit information relating to Plaintiff. 

2. The Parties have engaged in serious settlement discussions. The City of Philadelphia 

is being dismissed as a defendant. 

3. A settlement conference was scheduled to take place on Wednesday, March 12, 2003. 

 However, based on the parties’ discussions, it appears that this conference would not be productive. 

There are unresolved issues that will require third-party discovery, and additional discovery between 

the parties. 

4. Accordingly, the Parties respectfully requests that the Scheduling Order be modified 

to extend all existing deadlines for sixty (60) days. 

5. This extension of time is sought in the interests of justice, and will not interfere with 

any other date scheduled by this Court=s Scheduling Order. 

Case 2:02-cv-04440-AB Document 11 Filed 03/14/2003 Page 1 of 2
WHEREFORE, the Parties jointly respectfully request that this Court grant an extension of 

time of all existing deadlines for sixty (60) days. 

Respectfully Submitted this 14th day of March , 2003 

 

___________________________________

MARK E. KOGAN 

BRUCE S. LUCKMAN 

TIMOTHY P. CREECH 

SATZBERG, TRICHON, 

 KOGAN & WERTHEIMER, P.C. 

1818 Market St., 30th Floor 

Philadelphia, PA 19103 

(215) 575-7600; Fax: (215) 575-7688 

Counsel for Defendant, 

Trans Union LLC 

By/S/TPC w/ express permission 

___________________________________

JAMES A. FRANCIS 

MARK D. MAILMAN 

FRANCIS & MAILMAN, P.C. 

Land Title Building, 19th Floor 

Philadelphia, PA 19110 

(215) 735-8600; Fax: (215) 940-8000 

Counsel for Plaintiff 

Case 2:02-cv-04440-AB Document 11 Filed 03/14/2003 Page 2 of 2
II 

Calendar No. 580 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1537 

To amend the Neotropical Migratory Bird Conservation Act to reauthorize 

the Act. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 12, 2017 

Mr. CARDIN (for himself, Mr. COONS, Mr. VAN HOLLEN, Mr. FRANKEN, Mr. 

NELSON, Mr. UDALL, Mrs. FEINSTEIN, Mr. CARPER, Mr. LEAHY, Mr. 

PORTMAN, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, Mr. MERKLEY, and Mr. MARKEY) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

SEPTEMBER 18, 2018 

Reported by Mr. BARRASSO, without amendment 

A BILL 

To amend the Neotropical Migratory Bird Conservation Act 

to reauthorize the Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Migratory Birds of 

5 the Americas Conservation Act’’. 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1537 RS

1 SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF NEOTROPICAL MIGRATORY 

2 BIRD CONSERVATION ACT. 

3 Section 10 of the Neotropical Migratory Bird Con4 servation Act (16 U.S.C. 6109) is amended to read as fol5 lows: 

6 ‘‘SEC. 10. AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS. 

7 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—There is authorized to be appro8 priated to carry out this Act $6,500,000 for each of fiscal 

9 years 2019 through 2023. 

10 ‘‘(b) USE OF FUNDS.—Of the amounts made avail11 able under subsection (a) for each fiscal year, not less than 

12 75 percent shall be expended for projects carried out at 

13 a location outside of the United States.’’. 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS

amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 580 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1537 

A BILL 

To amend the Neotropical Migratory Bird 

Conservation Act to reauthorize the Act. 

SEPTEMBER 18, 2018 

Reported without amendment 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
Case 2:02-cv-20130-HB Document 9 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:02-cv-20130-HB Document 9 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:02-cv-20130-HB Document 9 Filed 11/26/2007 Page 3 of 3
Case 2:04-mc-00195-CMR Document 2 Filed 11/08/2004 Page 1 of 12
Case 2:04-mc-00195-CMR Document 2 Filed 11/08/2004 Page 2 of 12
Case 2:04-mc-00195-CMR Document 2 Filed 11/08/2004 Page 3 of 12
Case 2:04-mc-00195-CMR Document 2 Filed 11/08/2004 Page 4 of 12
Case 2:04-mc-00195-CMR Document 2 Filed 11/08/2004 Page 5 of 12
Case 2:04-mc-00195-CMR Document 2 Filed 11/08/2004 Page 6 of 12
Case 2:04-mc-00195-CMR Document 2 Filed 11/08/2004 Page 7 of 12
Case 2:04-mc-00195-CMR Document 2 Filed 11/08/2004 Page 8 of 12
Case 2:04-mc-00195-CMR Document 2 Filed 11/08/2004 Page 9 of 12
Case 2:04-mc-00195-CMR Document 2 Filed 11/08/2004 Page 10 of 12
Case 2:04-mc-00195-CMR Document 2 Filed 11/08/2004 Page 11 of 12
Case 2:04-mc-00195-CMR Document 2 Filed 11/08/2004 Page 12 of 12
## PMN Substance in Class B Fire-fighting Formulations Production

55 gallon container of 28 % PMN substance. Pump PMN substance into 10,000 gallon mix tank. Container for PMN substance is thoroughly rinsed with water/solvent mixture to themix tank. Some customers reuse/recycle the original container.

5, 55 or 275 gallon foam formulation containers with up to 5 wt% PMN substance. 10,000 gallon foam formulation mixer to mix AFFF components and PMN substance

Release Point 1 – from cleanout of PMN substance containers (2 kg/batch if not recycled).

Release Point 2 – Clean-out of formulation mixer (2 kg/batch).

Up to 2000 kg of PMN substance per batch of foam formulation Worker Activity A – Addition of PMN substance to 10,000 gallon mixing tank

Worker Activity B – Cleanout of PMN substance container.

Worker Activity C – Cleanout of mixing tank