alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2015337EN.01003401.xml

| 12.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 337/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 337/34

---

Action brought on 11 August 2015 — Makhlouf v Council

(Case T-466/15)

(2015/C 337/36)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Rami Makhlouf (Damascus, Syria) (represented by: E. Ruchat, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Declare the applicant’s action admissible and well founded; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare the applicant’s action admissible and well founded;

| — | Consequently, annul Decision (CFSP) 2015/837 of 28 May 2015 and the subsequent measures implementing it, in so far as they relate to the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

Consequently, annul Decision (CFSP) 2015/837 of 28 May 2015 and the subsequent measures implementing it, in so far as they relate to the applicant;

| — | Order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant raises three pleas in law which are, in essence, identical or similar to those raised in Case T-432/11 in Makhlouf v Council
   (1).

Makhlouf

Council

1

---

(1)  OJ C 290, p. 13.

1

---
Exhibit 23.2

Consent of Independent Engineers

We
refer to our report auditing estimates of the natural gas, natural gas liquids and oil reserves attributable to Husky Energy Inc. (the Company) as of December 31, 2015 (the Report).

We hereby consent to the use and reference to our name and the Report described or incorporated by reference in the Companys Annual Report on Form 40-F
for the year ended December 31, 2015 and the Companys registration statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-187135) and Form F-10 (File No. 333-208443), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, as applicable.



|                                                       
|-------------------------------------------------------
|Sincerely,                                             
|                                                       
|Sproule Associates Limited                             
|                                                       
|/s/ Cameron P. Six, P. Eng.                            
|Cameron P. Six, P. Eng.                                
|Vice President Engineering, Chief Engineer and Director
|                                                       
|Calgary, Alberta, Canada                               
|February 26, 2016
## MEMORANDUM

**DATE:** 1 2 / 1 /14 **FROM:** Ken Mitchell/EPA Region 4 **TO:** Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants; Docket Id: OAR – 2013 - 0602 **SUBJECT:** Discuss ion of the Clean Power Plan at the Georgia Environmental Conference
**SUMMARY :**  

### EPA Region 4 provided information on the Clean Power Plan to a group of Georgia legislators, consultants, attorneys and Georgia Environmental Protection Division employees at the Georgia Environmental Conference in Jekyll Island, GA on August 20 , 2014. The Clean Power Plan for Existing Power Plants was proposed on June 2, 2014. **ATTENDEES: EPA**  Heather McTeer Toney /EPA R4 Shea Jones
- Johnson /EPA R4 **External Stakeholders** Approximately 200 conference attendees
AFS-10-385-E Oct 14 2010

Exemption No. 9806A Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2007-29267

Mr. Stephen McLure Director of Operations Business Air, Inc. d.b.a. AirNow

2563 Walloomsac Road Bennington, VT 05201

Dear Mr. McLure:

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 9806. It explains the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists the conditions

and limitations.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated August 26, 2010, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of Business Air, Inc. d.b.a. AirNow, In c. (AirNow) for an extension of Exemption No. 9806. That exemption from § 61.45(a)(1)(i) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations allows AirNow to conduct type rating flight checks in either of two versions of the Embraer 110 (EMB-110) aircraft to satisfy the requirements under § 61.45.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition in the Federal Register because the requested extension of the exemption would not set a precedent, and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to AirNow.

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 9806 remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the2

authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition, subject to the following conditions and limitations.

Conditions and Limitations

1. Provisions of this exemption apply to EMB-110 aircraft only.

2. Crews utilizing this exemption must be trained and qualified on all differences between or among the variants of the EMB-110 aircraft operated by AirNow and to the standards required by part 135, on-demand, all cargo operations.

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 9806 to January 31, 2013, unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/ Raymond Towles Acting Director, Flight Standards

Service
rtsp://multimedia.mcpa.virginia.edu/911/hearing10/2004041302_high.rm
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification of Nevada ClassicThoroughbreds, Inc.pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002regarding Annual Report on Form 10-Kfor the year ended June 30, 2023**

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), theundersigned officer of Nevada Classic Thoroughbreds, Inc., a Nevada corporation(the "Company"), does hereby certify that, based upon her knowledge:

1. The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30,2023 (the "Form 10-K") fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. Information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

> 
Dated: October 15, 2023 

By: /s/ Pamela Brimhall 

 

________________________________________

 
Pamela BrimhallPrincipal Executive OfficerChief Executive Officer
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EDMUND V. LUDWIG 5118 United States Courthouse

 Judge Independence Mall West

 Philadelphia, PA 19106-1775

(215) 580-2030

(215) 580-2142 FAX

NOTICE 

RE: GENERAL REFRACTORIES v. FIRST STATE INSURANCE CO., et al.

CIVIL ACTION NO. 04-cv-3509

Counsel for plaintiff, Michael Conley, and counsel for defendants, 

Lexington Insurance Company and AIU Insurance Company, Gregory LoCasale, are 

informed that Diane M. Welsh of JAMS (215-246-9494) is available on December 1, 

2012, and counsel should contact her today to hold that date. Advise chambers. 

(215-580-2030).

Referral order will follow.

Very truly yours,

/s/ K. Crispell 

Kathryne M. Crispell

Deputy Clerk to Judge Ludwig

DATE: November 9, 2012

Copies to: (by E-Mail)

SAMUEL J. ARENA , JR

sarena@stradley.com 

MICHELE L. BACKUS 

mbackus@goodwin.com 

SUSAN SIMPSON BROWN 

sbrown@kochdemarco.com 

MICHAEL CONLEY 

mconley@offitkurman.com 

HOWARD M. CYR 

hcyr@harvpenn.com 

MICHAEL E. DIFEBBO , JR

difebbom@whiteandwilliams.com 

ELIT R. FELIX , II

efelix@margolisedelstein.com 

DANIEL T. FITCH 

DFitch@stradley.com 

ERIC A. FITZGERALD 

eafitzgerald@mdwcg.com 

MARC PAUL GORFINKEL 

paul.gorfinkel@rivkin.com 

Case 2:04-cv-03509-EL Document 477 Filed 11/09/12 Page 1 of 2
MARK E. GOTTLIEB 

mgottlieb@offitkurman.com 

JOHN P. HARTLEY 

jhartley@harvpenn.com

C. LAWRENCE HOLMES 

lholmes@dilworthlaw.com,gengel@dilworthlaw.com 

PAUL M. HUMMER 

phummer@saul.com,rmerryfield@saul.com 

WENDY H. KOCH 

wkoch@kochdemarco.com 

GREGORY T. LOCASALE 

locasaleg@whiteandwilliams.com 

WILLIAM T. MANDIA 

wmandia@stradley.com,rlee@stradley.com 

FRANCIS P. MANERI 

fmaneri@dilworthlaw.com 

JOSEPH COLEMAN MONAHAN 

jmonahan@saul.com,afield@saul.com 

KAREN H. MORIARTY 

kmoriarty@coughlinduffy.com,kwolff@coughlinduffy.com 

ERNESTO R. PALOMO 

epalomo@lockelord.com 

WILLIAM H. PILLSBURY 

wpillsbury@offitkurman.com,rwatson-satchell@offitkurman.com 

PAUL M. QUINONES 

pquinones@harvpenn.com 

JAMES J. RODGERS 

jrodgers@dilworthlaw.com 

JAMES P. RUGGERI 

jruggeri@goodwin.com 

PATRICIA B. SANTELLE 

santellep@whiteandwilliams.com,marchianom@whiteandwilliams.com 

DANIEL I. SCHLESSINGER 

dschlessinger@lockelord.com,lgrabowski@lockelord.com 

JOSHUA D. WEINBERG 

jweinberg@goodwin.com

DIANE M. WELSH dwelsh@jamsadr.com

Copies to: (by Mail)

 WILLIAM J. BOWMAN 

 JEREMY T. MONTHY 

 ANN M. UNGVARSKY 

 KEVIN E. WOLFF 

Case 2:04-cv-03509-EL Document 477 Filed 11/09/12 Page 2 of 2
Case No. 13,123.

#### SMITH v. The UTICA.

[4 Betts, D. C. MS. 41.]

District Court, S. D. New York.

Feb. 16, 1844.

■Seamen — Wages—Forfeiture — Failure to Report on Board — Competency of Witness.

[1. A seaman failing and refusing, when specially requested, to render himself on board pursuant to his contract, and only attempting to do so when the ship is in the act of casting off, thereby forfeits his wages for the voyage. He •does not, however, forfeit his trunk and contents; and. the same having been left on board, and part of the contents lost or purloined, the •ship is liable for the value thereof.]

[2. The seaman is a competent witness ex necessitate rei to prove the contents of the ■trunk when delivered on board.]

[This was a libel by Charles Smith against ■the ship Utica for wages, and to recover the value of property alleged to have been lost or stolen while in custody of the ship.]

BETTS, District Judge.

This cause having been heard upon the pleadings and proofs, and the premises being considered, and it appearing to the court that the preponderance of evidence is that the libellant •did not render himself on board the ship pursuant to his agreement, but neglected and refused, when specially required so to do, •and only attempted to go on board when the -ship was in the act of casting off and getting under way, although he well knew she had been, and then was, detained and waiting for her crew to come on board, it is therefore •considered by the court that the libellant has thereby forfeited and lost all right to wages under the shipping articles and his aaid contract, during the voyage of the said vessel. And it appearing to the court that the libellant put his chest or trunk on hoard the said vessel at the time of the contract, •containing wearing apparel and other articles •of value, and that the same has not been returned in full to him, but that portions of the contents thereof have been purloined or lost on board the said vessel; and- it being •considered by the court that the libellant has not forfeited the said property, and that the said ship is liable to him in this action for the value thereof; and it being further considered -by the court that the libellant is .a competent witness ex necessitate rei to prove the contents of the said chest or trunk at the time it was .delivered, and left on board the said ship, — It is therefore ordered and adjudged that the libellant recover in this case the value of the articles left by him on board said ship, and not redelivered and restored to him on her return to this port, and that it be referred to the clerk to ascertain and compute such value, and that on such reference the testimony taken and used on the hearing of the cause, and such other testimony as either party may offer and produce, that is pertinent and admissible, be received by the clerk. And it is further ordered that the question of costs be reserved until the coming in of the clerk’s report.
***EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS*I, Mel Rhinelander, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Extendicare HealthServices, Inc., certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Extendicare HealthServices, Inc.  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.   /s/ Mel Rhinelander      Mel Rhinelander
Exhibit 23

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-58324, No. 333-90076, No. 333-110068, No. 333-127465 and No. 333-132997) and on Form S-3 (No. 333-105789, No. 333-109057, No. 333-112599 and No. 333-123198) of Agere Systems Inc. of our report dated November 29, 2006 relating to the financial statements, managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP New York, New York November 29, 2006

---
Part 2

SUPPLEMENT

Line 

No.

USSGL 

Acct. USSGL Account Title

Begin/ 

End

Fed/ 

NonFed

Reporting 

Type Code

Addl. 

Info.

7

7 110100 General Fund of the U.S. Government's Operating Cash E N U

7 110300 Restricted Operating Cash E N U

7 110900 Checks Outstanding E N U

7 111000 Undeposited Collections E N E/U

7 112000 Imprest Funds E N E/U

7 112500 U.S. Debit Card Funds E N E/U

7 113000 Funds Held Outside of Treasury - Budgetary E N E/U

7 113500 Funds Held Outside of Treasury - Non-Budgetary E N E/U

7 113510 Restricted Cash Held Outside of Treasury - Non-Budgetary E N E/U

7 114500 Cash Held by U.S. Disbursing Officers Outside the 

Treasury's General Account

EN U

7 119000 Other Cash E N E/U

7 119090 Other Cash - International Monetary Fund E U

7 119305 International Monetary Fund - Letter of Credit E U

7 119306 International Monetary Fund - Receivable/Payable Currency 

Valuation Adjustment

E U

7 119307 International Monetary Fund - Dollar Deposits With the 

IMF

E U

7 119309 International Monetary Fund - Currency Holdings E U

7 119333 International Monetary Fund - Reserve Position E U

7 119400 Exchange Stabilization Fund (ESF) Assets - Holdings of 

Special Drawing Rights (SDR)

E N E/U

7 119500 Other Monetary Assets E N E/U

7 120000 Foreign Currency E N E/U

7 120500 Foreign Currency Denominated Equivalent Assets E N E

7 120900 Uninvested Foreign Currency E N E

7 123500 Foreign Currency Held Outside Of Treasury - Non- E N E/U

7 134400 Interest Receivable on Special Drawing Rights (SDR) E N E

7 138400 Interest Receivable - Foreign Currency Denominated Assets E N E

7 153100 Seized Monetary Instruments E N E/U

7 153200 Seized Cash Deposited E N E/U

22.3

22.3 259000 Other Debt E G E/U

22.3 299000 Other Liabilities Without Related Budgetary Obligations E F/G/N/Z E/F/U

22.3 299010 Other Liabilities Without Related Budgetary Obligations - 

General Fund of the U.S. Government

EF U

22.3 299100 Other Liabilities - Reductions E F/G E/F/U

22.3 299110 Reductions of Other Liabilities - General Fund of the U.S. 

Government

EF U

Other liabilities (Note 17)

With the public

Cash and other monetary assets (Note 4)

Section V

Fiscal Year 2021 Reporting

USSGL Crosswalk - Balance Sheet

Bulletin No. 2021-07 DRAFT BS - 1 IRC Handouts 12 03 20
EXHIBIT 23









CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-156601), Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-128256), Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-122701) and Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-75346) of The Phoenix Companies, Inc. of our report dated March 5, 2009 relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.







/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Hartford, Connecticut

March 5, 2009
(Reap. Dec. 10958)

#### Gay Cottons, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 1054230, etc.

(Decided April 20, 1965)

*Siegel, Handell & Davidson*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Rao, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement enumerated in schedule “A,” annexed to this decision and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the respective parties hereto that the merchandise covered by the appeals to reappraisement enumerated on Schedule “A” attached hereto and made a part hereof, consists of cotton wearing apparel exported from Portugal in 1962; that said merchandise is not identified in the final list published by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54521, effective February 27, 1958; that on or immediately preceding the date of exportation of each shipment of said merchandise covered by each of the appeals to reappraisement enumerated on Schedule “A”, the price at which said cotton wearing apparel, *627such as or similar to the wearing apparel described on the invoices covered by the instant appeals to reappraisement, was freely sold, or in the absence of sales, offered for sale in the principal market of Portugal, in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade, for export to the United States was:

> Entry No. Date of Entry Price

> 1054230 5/31/62 105 Eseudos/doz., net, packed

> 879246 12/10/62 " " " "

> 838782 11/ 4/62 " " " "

> 755533 8/18/62 " " " "

> 722947 283 " " " "

> 750003 8/18/62 " " " "

> 736282 7/30/62 " " " "

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that 28.30 Escudos are equal to $1.00 in United States funds.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appeals to reap-praisement referred to herein may be submitted on this stipulation.

> Upon the agreed facts, I find export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (b) of tbe Tariff Act of 1930, as amended 'by tbe Customs Simplification Act of 1956, to be the proper basis for determination of the value of tbe cotton wearing apparel covered by said appeals for reappraisement; that such values are as follows:

> Entry No. Price

> 1054230 105 Escudos/doz., net, packed

> 879246 “ “ “ “ “

> 838782 “ “ “ “ “

> 755533 “ “ “ “

> 722947 283 “ “ “ “

> 750003 “ “ “ “

> 736282 “ “ “ “ “

and that, for tbe purposes of tbe foregoing, 28.30 Portuguese escudos are equal to $1 in United States currency.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1584 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 242
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1584

                          [Report No. 115-172]

   To amend the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 to reauthorize the 
     Judicial Conference of the United States to redact sensitive 
   information contained in financial disclosure reports of judicial 
            officers and employees, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 19, 2017

 Mr. Johnson (for himself and Mrs. McCaskill) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

                            October 16, 2017

               Reported by Mr. Johnson, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 to reauthorize the 
     Judicial Conference of the United States to redact sensitive 
   information contained in financial disclosure reports of judicial 
            officers and employees, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDACTION AUTHORITY CONCERNING SENSITIVE SECURITY 
              INFORMATION.

    (a) In General.--Section 105(b)(3) of the Ethics in Government Act 
of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) is amended by striking subparagraph (E).
    (b) Technical Amendments.--Section 105(b)(1) of the Ethics in 
Government Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) is amended--
            (1) in the first sentence, by striking the second comma 
        after ``as the case may be''; and
            (2) in the third sentence, by inserting a comma after ``as 
        the case may be''.
                                                       Calendar No. 242

115th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1584

                          [Report No. 115-172]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

   To amend the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 to reauthorize the 
     Judicial Conference of the United States to redact sensitive 
   information contained in financial disclosure reports of judicial 
            officers and employees, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            October 16, 2017

                       Reported without amendment
```