alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
**Certification of Chief Executive Officer**
I, Thomas W. Rabaut, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of United DefenseIndustries, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and
c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: November 4, 2004   /s/ Thomas W. Rabaut   Title:            President and Chief Executive Officer
Laccolith Complexes of Southeastern Utah: 

Time of Emplacement and Tectonic Setting—

Workshop Proceedings

U.S. Department of the Interior

U.S. Geological Survey

U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 2158
Cover. A flat-topped dike, from G.K. Gilbert, Geology of the Henry Mountains, U.S. Geographical and Geolog

Survey of the Rocky Mountain Region (Powell Survey), 1880.
LACCOLITH COMPLEXES OF SOUTHEASTERN U

TIME OF EMPLACEMENT AND TECTONIC SETT

WORKSHOP PROCEED
Frontispiece. Landsat 5 Thematic Mapper color-infrared composite image of the northern part of the Paradox Ba

the La Sal Mountain laccolith complex. See page z for generalized geologic map of the area.
M A R C H 3, 18 4 9

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE 

Laccolith Complexes of Southeastern Utah:

Time of Emplacement and Tectonic Setting—

Workshop Proceedings

By Jules D. Friedman and A. Curtis Huffman, Coordinators

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 2158

Application of new geochemical dating techniques,

geophysics, and geologic mapping results to the

classic problem of the nature and geologic setting

of these well-known complexes in order to clarify

time of Tertiary volcanism and relationship to

regional tectonics

UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1997
For sale by U.S. Geological Survey, Information Services

Box 25286, Federal Center

Denver, CO 80225

Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and

does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government

Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR

BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary

U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY

Gordon P. Eaton, Director

Laccolith complexes of southeastern Utah : time of emplacement and tectonic setting : workshop 

proceedings / [edited] by Jules D. Friedman and A. Curtis Huffman, coordinators.

p. cm. – (U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 2158)

Report of a workshop held in Denver, Colo., July 6–7, 1992.

Includes bibliographical references.

Supt. Of Docs. No.: I 19.3:2158

1. Laccoliths—Utah—Congresses. 2. Geology, Stratigraphic—Tertiary—Congresses.

3. Geology—Utah—Congresses.

I. Friedman, Jules D. II. Huffman, A.C. III. Series.

QE75.B9 no. 2158

[QE611.5.U5]

557.3 s—dc20

[551.8¢8} 96-26993 

 CIP
In Memoriam

Eugene M. Shoemaker

April 28, 1928—July 18, 1997

Charles B. Hunt

August 9, 1906—September 3, 1997

Next section
No. 66303.

#### Hybern, Inc., DBA The Akron et al. *v.*United States,

protests 59/9803, etc. (Los Angeles).

*402Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of vacuum brush cleaners similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Bruce Duncan Company, a/c Sims-Worms*v. *United States*(45 Cust. Ct. 85, C.D. 2202), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
1Pursuant to this Court’s Order of September 3, 2002, the joint status report was to have

been filed. A copy of the September 23, 2002, shall be filed with this Order.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

TONG HO ZHANG, A-70-577-572 : CIVIL ACTION

Petitioner, :

 :

vs. :

 :

JOHN ASHCROFT, U.S. Attorney :

General and IMMIGRATION and :

NATURALIZATION SERVICE :

Respondents. : NO. 02-4377

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 24th day of September, 2002, the Court having received a status report

from counsel dated September 23, 2002,1IT IS ORDERED that on or before October 24, 2002, 

counsel shall file and serve a supplemental joint status report with regard to further proceedings

in the case. One (1) copy of the supplemental joint status report shall be served on the Court

(Chambers, Room 12613) when the original is filed. 

The Court noting from the joint status report of September 23, 2002, that the parties are

negotiating with respect to a stay of deportation and that, should the parties be unable to reach

agreement on or before October 8, 2002, petitioner “. . . will file a Motion for Stay of

Deportation with the Court,” IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that in the event the parties are

unable to reach agreement with regard to a stay of deportation, a Motion for Stay of Deportation

shall be filed and served on or before October 15, 2002. The response to the Motion shall be

filed and served within seven (7) days of service of a copy of the Motion. One (1) copy of any

Case 2:02-cv-04377-JD Document 13 Filed 09/24/2002 Page 1 of 2
2

such Motion and response shall be served on the Court (Chambers, Room 12613) when the

originals are filed.

BY THE COURT:

 

 JAN E. DUBOIS, J.

Case 2:02-cv-04377-JD Document 13 Filed 09/24/2002 Page 2 of 2
### IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10

- 23

- 00351

- CR

No. 10

- 23

- 00367

- CR

AMAAR ABDULRAHAM TAYEH

, Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

, Appellee

From the County Court at Law No

. 2

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No s

. 20220292CR2 and 20221062CR2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant’s briefs in these appeals were due February 23, 2024. No briefs have

been filed. We abated and remanded these appeals to the trial court on April 2, 2024 to

determine whether, among other items, appellant was receiving effective assistance of

counsel. In response to the abatement order, appellant has sign ed

, and this Court’s Clerk

has filed

, motions to dismiss both of these appeals.

In light of the motions to dismiss, we withdraw t he Abatement Order issued onTayeh v. State Page 2 April 2, 2024, and reinstate these appeals.

After consideration by the Court

, appellant’s “Motion to Dismiss Appeal” filed on

April 9, 2024 in both appellate case numbers is granted

, and these appeals are dismissed.

TOM GRAY

Chief Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Johnson, and

Justice Smith

Motions granted

Appeals dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed April 1 8 , 2024

Do not publish

[CR25]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1423

CARL J. ROBERTS,

Petitioner,

versus

CAVALIER MINING CORPORATION; DIRECTOR, OFFICE

OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED

STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,

Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.

(No. 93-674-BLA)

Submitted: January 28, 1997 Decided: February 12, 1997

Before HALL and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit

Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Carl J. Roberts, Petitioner Pro Se. CAVALIER MINING CORPORATION,

Wise, Virginia; Dorothy L. Page, Christian P. Barber, UNITED STATES

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for Respondents.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision

and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black

lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp.

1996). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision

is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Roberts v.

Cavalier Mining Corp., No. 93-674-BLA (B.R.B. Feb. 7, 1996). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
|                                                                                                                                        | NHTSA               Home | Contact               Us   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                  |
|                                                                                                                                             |
| Home |  Legislation       | CAFE Overview | Recent Rulemaking Actions |       CAFE Data | Fuel Economy       Guide | Studies | Other       Links |

|  

 

**Docket                 Management                System**

 

 

**Get                 the lastest Acrobat Reader now** |  
Annual Update on the Automotive Fuel Economy Program
 

This annual report summarizes the fuel economy performance               of the current vehicle fleet and highlights the activities of the               National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), during the               calendar year. This report also includes a section summarizing rulemaking               activities.
-  Automotive                   Fuel Economy Program - 2002 Annual Update
-  Automotive                 Fuel Economy Program - 2001 Annual Update    
- Automotive                 Fuel Economy Program - 2000 Annual Update
- Automotive                 Fuel Economy Program - 1999 Annual Update    
- Automotive                 Fuel Economy Program - 1997 Annual Update |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
#   2

&"Arial,Bold"Part 2SUPPLEMENT&"Arial,Regular"	&"Arial,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2019 ReportingSection VII&"Arial,Regular"

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2019-06	&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000DRAFT&K000000  VII EDR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout 2/14/19
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 2 0 2 3

- 0 82 0

_____________________________
J IMMIE C ASEN ,
Petitioner
,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Respondent

.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Mandamus

— Original Jurisdiction

.

December 29, 2023

P ER C URIAM

.
D ISMISSED

.
R OBERTS , R OWE , and R AY , JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________

Jimmie Casen
, pro se, Petitioner

.2 Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Respondent

.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Stephen K. Gartside, Jr., certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qof Evolving Systems, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material factnecessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and Iare responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

 

(a) Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosed in thisreport any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reportingthat occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

(a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date: August  10, 2004                 |
|----------------------------------------|
|                                   |
| /s/ STEPHEN  K. GARTSIDE, JR.          |   |
| Stephen K.  Gartside, Jr.              |
| President  and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2014-0385 Directorate ID: 2013-SW-079-AD

Helicopter Model: Columbia Helicopters, Inc. (Type Certificate Previously Held By Boeing 

Defense & Space Group) Model 234 Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 4 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: The actions of this AD are intended to detect fatigue cracks in the aft pylon attach 

structure to prevent overload of the aft pylon structure and failure of the rotor blade, rotor blade 

vibration, departure of the aft pylon, and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter $250,000 to replace a blade

Labor per Helicopter

(1 work-hour to visually 

inspect all blades, 6 workhours to dye-penetrant 

inspect the pylon, and 4 

work-hours to do the tap test 

inspection x $85/work-hour

for labor cost)

(4 work hours to replace a 

blade x $85/work-hour for 

labor cost)

$935

$340

Other (Explain)

Total Cost per Helicopter $935 for the inspections

$250,340 to replace a blade

Total US Fleet Cost $3,740 for the inspections

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Kathleen Arrigotti
Part 1

SUPPLEMENT

USSGL 

Acct. USSGL Account Title

Anticipated

Budg/ 

Prop

Norm 

Bal

Begin

/ End

Debit/ 

Credit

Auth 

Type 

Code

Apport 

Cat

Apport 

Cat B

Avail 

Time

BEA 

Cat

Borrow 

Source

Budgetary 

Impact 

Indicator

Cohort 

Year

Cust/ 

Noncust

Exch/ 

Nonexch

Fed/ 

Nonfed

Trading 

Prtnr

Trading 

Partner 

Main

PY

Adj DEFC

Pgm 

Rpt 

Cat

Reimb 

Flag

Year 

of 

BA

Reduction 

Type BOC Fund Type

Reporting 

Type 

Code

Financing 

Account 

Code

TAS 

Status

Trans. 

Code

416500 Allocations of Authority - Anticipated From Invested Balances Y B D E D/C D/M 1001/1992-

2023 1 or 3 

character 

OMB 

approved 

value

D EC/EG/EM/EP/ER/ES/ET/TR E/F/U D/G/N U X/K/N

416512 Allocations of Authority - Anticipated From Invested Balances 

- Prior Year

Y B D E D/C P D 1 or 3 

character 

OMB 

approved 

value

D ET E/F/U N U N

442000 Unapportioned Authority - Pending Rescission N B C E D/C D/M 1 or 3 

character 

OMB 

approved 

value

D/R EC/EG/EM/EP/ER/ES/ET/TR E/F/U N U X/K/N

443000 Unapportioned Authority - OMB Deferral N B C E D/C D/M 1 or 3 

character 

OMB 

approved 

value

D/R EC/EG/EM/EP/ER/ES/ET/TR E/F/U N U X/K/N

472000 Commitments - Programs Exempt From Apportionment N B C E D/C A/S D/M 1001/1992-

2023 1 or 3 

character 

OMB 

approved 

value

D/R EC/EG/EM/EP/ER/ES/ET/TR E/F/U D/G/N U X/K/N

Fiscal Year 2022 Reporting

Section IV

U.S. Standard General Ledger - Attribute Table

U S S G L A C C O U N T USSGL ATTRIBUTES B U L K F I L E A T T R I B U T E S T A S A T T R I B U T E S

Bulletin No. 2022-XX DRAFT April 2022 IRC Meeting Handout
No. 54557.

#### J. Powell & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 145819-K and 145903-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
# sec5_balsh_2022

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2022-04	&"Arial,Bold"&10V BS - &P	&"Arial,Bold"&10December 2021
EX-10.3






PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT ASSIGNMENT




This Purchase and Sale Agreement Assignment (“Assignment”) is made as of June 26, 2008 by and
between Grubb & Ellis Realty Investors, LLC (formerly known as Triple Net Properties, LLC), a
Virginia limited liability company (“Assignor”), and G&E Apartment REIT Creekside Crossing, LLC, a
Delaware limited liability company (“Assignee”), and is made with respect to the Purchase and Sale
Agreement by and between Assignor and Atlanta Creekside Gardens Associates, LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company (“Seller”) dated June 12, 2008, as amended (“PSA”). For good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby
agree as follows:



Assignor hereby assigns to Assignee all of Assignor’s right, title and interest in and to the PSA,
the escrow created pursuant to the PSA, any Deposits (as defined in the PSA) in such escrow or held
by Seller, and all other rights and assets appurtenant to any of the foregoing (“Assets”).



Assignee hereby accepts the Assets and assumes all of Assignor’s obligations under the PSA, whether
arising before or after the date of this Assignment. Assignor acknowledges that it is not released
from any PSA obligations, whether arising before or after the date of this Assignment, as a result
of such assignment.



Upon delivery hereto to Seller, Buyer’s address per PSA Section 14.3 is hereby unchanged.



In witness whereof, the undersigned have executed this Assignment as of the above date.



	 	 	 
	Assignor:

	 	Grubb & Ellis Realty Investors, LLC (formerly

known as Triple Net Properties, L.L.C.), a

Virginia limited liability company
	
 
	 	By: /s/ Francene LaPoint

Francene LaPoint

Title: Chief Financial Officer
	Assignee:

	 	G&E Apartment REIT Creekside Crossing,







	 	 	LLC, a Delaware limited liability company






By: /s/ Gus G. Remppies




	 	 	Gus G. Remppies,






Authorized Signatory
**Exhibit 15.2**

Consent of Independent Registered Certified Public Accounting Firm 

TracFone Wireless, Inc. 

Miami, Florida 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statement on Form F-3 (No. 333-137695) of América Móvil, S.A. de C.V. (“América Móvil”) and Radiomóvil Dipsa, S.A. de C.V. of our report dated February 12, 2007, relating to theconsolidated financial statements of TracFone Wireless, Inc., appearing in the Annual Report (Form 20-F) of América Móvil for the year ended December 31, 2006. 

/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP 

Miami, Florida 

June 27, 2007