## SANITIZED VERSION
..



# OPPT-2011-0182

PROJECTSUM:MARYREPORT 

# . APPENDIX 14 Jan

**l<oE:~hn,** M.S., CIH, Inc. 8926Kirby Drive Houston, TX 71054

(71$) $15Q7 FA)< (713) 664-6443



### REQUESTED INDUSTRIALHYGIENE PERSONAL AND

### AREAMONITORING

FORIDEN'I'IF'IED AIRBORNE CHEMICALHAZARDS OF 1\IDIAND/ORTDI ASSOCIATEDWITH

### ISOCYANATE-CONTAINING PRODUCTUSE SCENARIOS FORIDENTIFIED CONSTRUCTION SEALANTS AND/ORBASECOATPRODUCTS BASF CORPORATION 889 VALLEY PARKDRIVE SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA DECEMBER 6, 2011



## llll }11(111( lll{lll[/ll[/ll[lll[/ll[/11(111111(111111111


## Company Sanitized

## SANITIZED

## VERSION 

# Jl(no.

PROJECTSUMMARYREPORT Jan Koehn. M.S., CIH, Inc. 8926 Kirby Drive Houston, TX 77054

(713) 664.-1597**FflV<(713)664~3** 

### REQUESTED INDUSTRIALHYGffiNEPERSONALAND AREAMONITORING

FORD)ENTIFIED AIRBORNE CHEMICALHAZARDS OFMDI AND/ORTDI ASSOCIATED WITH ISOCYANATE
..CONTAINING PRODUCT USESCENARIOS FOR

## IDENriFIEn CONSTRUCTION SEALANTS AND/ORBASECOAT PRODUCTS

SCOPEOFWORK: BASF CORPORATION 

### 889 VALLEYPARKDRIVE SHAKOPEE, MINNESOTA DECEMBER 6, 20ll

Jan Koehn, M.S.• CIH, 

### Inc. or JK, Inc. was contracted to perform industrial hygiene consulting work for BASF Corporation Construction Chemicals for Building Systems research and development facility located at 889 Valley Park Drive in Shakopee, Minnesota during July 2011. The requested professional consulting services involved specified airborne monitoring related to defined potential exposure testing scenarios for the identified chemical hazards of methylene bisphenyl isocyanate (MDI) or toluene diisocyanate (TDI). Acombination ofoutlined personal and atea industrial hygiene monitoring to document various defined airborne exposures to the identified chemical hazards (i.e. MDI and/or TDI) was undertakenbased on a provided sampling strategy involving various product application scenarios. Comparison ofthe monitoring results obtained to the current threshold Limit Values (TLVs) published by the American COnference ofGovernmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) as well as good industrial hygiene practices was completed. The projectwork activities were outlined as follows: 1. Discuss a defined industrial hygiene sampling strategy for identified proposed exposure testing scenarios (4) involving the outlined chemical hazards (i.e. MDI and/or TDI) for the specified isocyanate-containing products (2 sealants andl surface basecoat) related to standard anticipated application procedures for the building**cons~tion** 

### industry withinthe BASFresearch and developmentfacility, 2. Review the outlined sampling strategy with facility EHS and project personnel and coordinate the on-site airborne isocyanate monitoring effort involving specified activities during a scheduled work 

### day inJuly 2011, 3. Conduct requested personal and area exposure monitoring for identified chemical hazards involving the outlined product application**an~** 

### testing scenarios specified 

### by the Client's representatives in

### accordance with defmed local site conditions as directed bythe research and 

### developmentgroup and complete siterecordkeeping, 

## basiJinr:(;.:**\r'@!i:.!t~tt,·o·"' ,l.~**  ., . \: '**f~,.,"'1 ~** **·~** r**~~tt.~.J** JK, Inc. Report#:**111~11** - 1-

## SANITIZED VERSION
SCOPE OF

## WORK: (oontinued) 4. Provide collected industrial hygiene samples following outlined field desorption to EHS personnel for return shipment to the BASF Corporation laboratory in Wyandotte, MI for .routine sample analysis by afapility accreditedbythe American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA), and 5. Prepare a subsequentprojectsummary isocyanate monitoring report for the Client. 

### METHODOLOGY: An outlined sampling strategy for BASF Corporation Construction Chemicals was discussed with Jan Koehn, M.S., CIH of JK, Inc. including direct input from the Client's representatives related to the defmed airborne sampling strategy for isocyanate& associated with application ofsealants and/or a surface coating product involving standard building systemuse. Based on discussions with the Client's representatives regarding the potential for airborne exposures to the specified chemical hazards related to standard product·application, review of current workplace exposure standards and guidelines, use ofa developed isocyanate sampling and analytical method, and good work practices and procedures, a project site-specific industrial hygiene sampling strategy was outlined for review to complete the exposure testing scenariosforthe defined monitoring scope ofwork. This airborne sampling strategy addressed a combination ofrepresentative personal as well as general area samples for

**specifi~d**potential workplace chemical hazards (i.e. MDI and/or TDI) during defined separate productapplication procedures including short-term 

### (15 minutes) and partial period (1 hour) time intervals involving 3 products and 4 separate scenarios. Three consecutive replicate sample sets were collected for each defmed exposure testing scenario as directed by BASF projectpersonnel. Airborne samples were collected in accordance with the defined project sampling strategy at the BASF research and development facility on July 14, 2011. The referenced industrial hygiene sampling 

### and analytical methods for the identified chemical components (i.e. MDI and/or TDI) was OSHA 47/42 involving use of cah'brated pumps from JK, Inc. and provided sample media as 13 mm treated filter cassettes from the Client's laboratory. Short-term personal as well as partial period work area monitoring was completed during specified product application scenarios in accordance with the defmed BASF exposure testing airborne sampling ·strategy for the identified isocyanate components as performed by project personnel at the research and development site locations. The scenarios were as follows: horizontal application of the SonoguardTM Basecoat in an ambient environment; gunning cards with Sonolasticnx NPl product in the lab; use of Sonolastic NPl andMOlBased Construction Adhesiveproducts, respectively in an allocated 6' x 6' constricted space; and, Sonolastic NPl and MDI-Based Construction Adhesive application, respectivelywithin an office space to simulate a typical 10' x 12' residential room. The 6' x6' constricted space scenario was designed to simulate an extreme "worst-case" situation. According to BASF applications experts, typically, no more than 2

- 3 units of 10 fl oz. cartridges would 

### be used in a confined space. However, in this case, 7

- 10 cartridge units were applied in the allotted time without any specificfurther ventilationprovided. JK, Inc. Report#: 111-11 -2-

## SANITIZEDVERSION

METHODOLOGY: (continued) SKCpersonal sampling pumps were pre- and post-calibrated with a primary standard and adjusted to the ·appropriate flow rates recommended for air sample collection of the identified isocyanate substances for the defined timeintervals based on the developed sampling strategy. Appropriate media (i.e. prepared 13 mmtreated filter cassettes) was used to collect representative industrial hygiene airborne monitoring samples based on .the defined product application scenarios as outlined by the Client's representatives. Short-term breathing zone personal samples were obtained for 15 minutes during direct product application for each defined scenario and partial period general area samples were also separately collected for a time interval ofone hour adjacent to the application area location. A defined airborne sample field desorption procedure was employed by the Consultant as provided by the Client's representative in accordance with· the referenced industrial hygiene sampling and analytical method. Appropriate field blaiik samples for chemical components were also prepared for laboratory analysis to address standard quality control considerations. Use of personal protective equipment was also subsequently observed as employedbyBASFprojectpersonnel. RESULTSAND DISCUSSION: Appendix 1 presents information about JK, Inc. personnel involved in performance of this exposure monitoring project. Appendix 2 contains the Client-provided isocyanate exposure testing scenarios for defined products and specified application methods at site locations. Appendix 3 presents a data summary of the project industrial hygiene airborne monitoring results based on the outlined sampling strategy. Appendix 4 contains the lab analytical result documentation from the BASF industrial hygiene laboratory. Appendix 5 presents some digital photographs of the various application scenarios and site locations associated with completion ofthe defined airborne industrial hygiene monitoring effort. Personal monitoring was performed for a defined 15-minute time interval located within the breathing zone of the BASF technician completing outlined product application based on the specified exposure testing scenarios. An adjacent work area sample was collected for a time interval of one hour within the outlined general .area location directly adjacent to the application process. Three consecutive airborne isocyanate monitoring efforts were conducted in order to obtain replicate samples for each defined exposure testing scenario. Clean-up and removal of the applied product from each site exposure monitoring location was addressed after an elapsed time ofone hour inCluding collection, processing, and field desorption of the air samples with subsequent set-up of the defined location for the next scenario application effort and allowance for some air exchange inthe specified work area.

JK, Inc. Report#: 111-11 -3-

## SANITIZED VERSION
RESULTS

## ANDDISCUSSION:. (contintled) MDI-Based 

### Construction Adhesive

-

**Qen:er~Iy,** nqn-:detectable <reSUlts were noted for MDIassociatedwiththe twoexposure scenariosinvolvingMDJ.,Based ConstructionAdhesiveproduct application·either·in.a constricted space or an office location; .Limited detectable results for 2,6.:.TDI were also notedfor the

**ar~a** samples ranging from 0
..67to 1.5 ppb associated withPL MDI·Based Construction Adhesiveproductapplicationwithinthe constricted space, AccordingtoBASF personnel, theMDI-Based Construction Adhesiveproductdoe.s not contain TDI. compared to the Sonolastic NP-1 product which does have this component; therefore, itwas stated thatthe most likely reason for the reported presence ofTDI is that the confmed space room maY not have been given sufficienttime for air exchange after furthermonitoring inthe same room following use ofthe Sonolastic NP-1. The scenario involving "gunning cards
.. in the lab also did not reportthe detectable presence ofeither 2,4..:TDI or2,6-TDI. Sonoguard Basecoat·Results

- Horizontal application of the Sonoguard Basecoat product performed inthe outdoor ambient environment reported non-detectableresults for both 2,4-TDI and 2,6-TDI for the personal samples. The area samples, taken ata 1to

### 2 foot range from the actual application, reported a single detectable result of 0.43 ppb 2,4-TDI and also area monitoring resu•ts ranging from 0.35 to 15 ppb based on an airborne exposure for a one hour time interval. The highest area result was obtained for the ambient application sample location directly on the ground that was positioned closer to the inside comer intersection of the BASF facility buildings outside the rear loading dock with increased winds noted. Sonolastic NP-1 Results

- For these productapplication scenarios involving either the office or constricted space, respectively, all results for 2,4-TDI were reported as not detected (ND). A range ofgenerally detectable results for 2,6-TDI was reported both for the personal breathing zone and adjacent area samples up to 1.5 ppb for the office space location associated with product application. For these applications, a range of 7 - 10 units of the 10 fl oz. cartridges were employed compared to a typical use of 2

- 3 units for a similar application within these further restricted work areas. Slightly higher 2,6-TDI results were reported for use of the same product within a constricted space. The results for this scenario were as follows: personal sample results between 1.6 to 3.7 ppb; and, area sample results ranging from 2.7 to 7.8 ppb. Only these final area results based on a one-hour sample collection period approach or may exceed the published ACGIH TLV of 0.005 ppm for TOI [as an 8- hour Time Weighted Average (TWA)]. The personal samples for the TDI components do not approach orexceed the published ACGIH TLV

- STELof

**0~02** ppm or 20 ppb. These levels are substantially below the OSHA Ceiling Limit of 0.02 ppm and the ACGIH TLV of 0,005 ppm as an 8-hour Time Weighted Average (TWA). NIOSH also publishes two Recommended Exposure Limits (RELs) of0.005 ppm as an 8-hour TWA and a Ceiling Limit of0.02 ppm based ona 10minute time interval. Thereported sample results for the defined scenarios employing limited sampling time intervals were substantially below published occupational exposure standards and recommended technical guidelines. All industrial hygiene monitoring results are presented in Appendix 3 and·a

**s~arate** technical data summary related to the different exposure scenarios is also included below.
JK, Inc. Report#: 111-11 -4-

## SANITIZED

# VERSION
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: (continued) Monitoring result summary based on different scenarios: Scenario 4: Horizontal Application

### ofSonoguard Basecoat hi.

### Ambient·Environii1e1lt**Pers~mal** S'fELbreathing zone monitoring for TDI components: Results- Not Detected{ND) ranging from 0.76 to 0.81 ppb Area monitoring during product'application: 2,4-TDI

- one result at 0.43 ppb 2,6-TDI- three detectable results reported at0.35, 15; and 5.4ppb 

### Scenario 1: Gunning 

### Cards inLab with 

### Sonolastic NP-1 Product Personal STELbreathing zone monitoring forTDI (both 2,4-TDI and 2,6-TDI): Results..,. Not Detected (ND) at0.59ppb Areamonitoring during product application: Results- NotDetected (ND) at0.21 ppb 

### Scenario 2: SealantApplication ofSonolastic NP-1 Product in

### ConStricted Space Bothpersonal STEL and area samples for 2,4-TDI- Not Detected {ND) at0.20 to 0.78 ppb Personal STELbreathing zone monitoring for 2,6-TDI: Results- reported at 1.6, 3.7, and 2.9ppb, respectively for three airborne samples during consecutive application efforts in same room Area monitoring during product application: Results- reported at 2.7, 7.5, and 7.8 ppb, respectively for .three airborne samples during consecutive application efforts in same room 

### Scenario 3: Sealant Application ofSonolastic NP-1 Productin Office Space Bothpersonal STEL and area samples for 2,4-TDI- Not Detected (ND) at0.21 to 0.80ppb Personal STELbreathing zone monitoring for 2,6-TDI: Results

- reported at 1.0, ND at0.80 ppb, and 0.81 ppb, respectively for three airborne samples during consecutive application efforts in same office Areamonitoring during product application: Results- reported at 1.5, 0.92, and 0.93 ppb, respectively for three airborne samples during consecutive application efforts in same office 

### Scenario 2: SealantApplication ofMOl-Based ConstructionAdhesive in Constricted Space Bothpersonal STELand area samples for MDI

- Not Detected (ND) 

### Scenario 3: SealantApplication ofMOl-Based ConstructionAdhesive in 

### Office Space Bothpersonal STEL and area samples for MDI

- Not Detected (ND)

JK, Inc. Report#: 111-11 -5.

## SANITIZED VERSION
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS:

. 1bis repprt documents the results of representative industrial hygiene monitoring for potential exposure testing scenarios involving three (3) isocyanate"'containing products associated with four ( 4) defmed application methods/locations by BASF research and development personnel to identified chenrleal hazards (i.e. MPIa11d TDI, respectively) during July 2011. Jan Koehn, M.S., CIH, Inc, personnel conducted this monitoring activity for the BASF Corporatipn Constructi()n Chenrlcals group for Building Systems at the facility located in Shakopee, MN based on scheduling with the Client's representatives. Monitoring was completed on identified BASF personnel performitlg the outlined product application procedures based on the defined scenarios during a selected day work shift. The personal monitoring results for chemical agents were reported below the OSHA Ceiling Limit.a.s well as the ACGIH TLV-TWA based on technical air monitoring da.ta review for the specified scenarios and the relatively short-term monitoring efforts**~ddressed** 

### fot the assessment project.

JK, Inc. Report#: 111-11 -6-

## SANITIZED VERSION



## APPENDICES

## SANITIZED VERSION

APPENDIX 1 PROJECTPERSONNELDOCUMENTATION

' - . -I

## SANITIZED VERSION

BIOGRAPHY Jan Koehn, M.S., CIH Jan Koehn, M.S., CIH, Inc. 8926 Kirby Drive Houston, TX 770!)4

(713)

**6~1597** FAX (713)

**664~$443**



### Ms. Koehn bas a Bachelor ofScience degree from Texas A & 

### M University in Microbiology, and a Ma,Ster of Science degree from the University of Texas School of Public Health in Environmental Sciences

**~** 

### Industrial Hygiene/Toxicology. She has over

**twenty~five** 

### years of experience in Industrial Hygiene and Safety as well as asbestos abatement, technical surveillance and project management consulting work. She is licensed by the Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS) as an Individual Asbestos Consultant since 1993 and maintains the state of Texas Mold Assessment Co!lSultant license obtained ·in 2004. Ms. Koehn bas performed audits in various facilities for environmental issues including asbestos,· indoor air quality, noise, and industrial hygiene surveys including representative monitoring for various chemical, physical, and biological hazards in a variety ofmanufacturing, industrial, and field work sites. She has prepared bid and contract specifications for asbestos abatement and mold remediation projects for Clients and completed project surveys, management work, and extensive air monitoring and technical site investigations. She has addressed numerous infection control concerns as well as site data monitoring and assessments in hospitals and health care institutions both in the Texas Medical Center as well as throughout the GulfCoast and surrounding areas. She is a Certified Industrial Hygienist (CIH) by the American Board of Industrial Hygiene (ABIH) in Comprehensive Practice since 1987 and has properrequired Certification Maintenance (CM) points. Ms. Koehn teaches various technical asbestos and indoor air quality courses previously for the Texas Engineering Extension Service ofTexas A & 

### M University and also site-specific Hazardous Waste. Operations refresher training (CPR 1910.120). Ms. Koehn provided safety course instruction during 1997 to 2000 and also for an Industrial Hygiene sampling and analysis course at the University of

**Houston~lear** 

### Lake in 2008, 2012, and 2012. respectively. She teaches an Industrial Hygiene Instrumentation course for the University of Houston

- Downtown in the Safety and Fire Engineering Technology program from 2004 to present. She is also a member ofnumerous professional organizations in 

### the technical fields of industrial hygiene, safety, and riskmanagement. Shehas been a member ofboth the national and local sections ofthe American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) for over 25 years and a member ofthe Board as aDirectorinvolving Continuing EducationCommittee Chairperson. She was previously a member of the Asbestos Analysts Committee of the Laboratory Quality Assurance Programs ofAIHA and also a Consultant member ofthe Academy Committee Team (ACT) involved with the program planning for the annual Professional Conference on Industrial Hygiene (PCIH) sponsored by the American Board of Industrial Hygiene (ABIH). She is President ofJK, Inc., a full-service .industrial hygiene and indoor air 

### quality consulting company, whichhas beeninbusiness within Texas and 

### throughoutthe United States for twenty-fouryears. 01/12. .. . . 

## SANITIZED 

# VERSION

APPENDIX 2 PROVIDEDPROJECTSAMPLING STRATEGY

## SANITIZED\IERSION 

## Proposed Exposure Testing Scenarios for Isocyanate Containing Products Prod4c:ts to be Evaluate(l: Sonolastic NP-1 (TDI), MOl-Based**Con$~ruction** 

### Adhesive (Polymeric MDI), Sonoguard Basecoat (TDI) **************************************************************************************** 

### Sonolastic NP-1.and MOl-Based Construction Adhesive Scenario 1 

### Location: Sample Lab**A.ctivi~:** 

### Production ofSales Samples (i.e. NP-1 Color Cards) Exposure Time: 15 Minutes and XX hours Type of Monitoring: Personal monitoring (15 minutes) using OSHA Modified Method 42/47 (3X)

Scenario 2 Area TWA monitoring (1 hour beginning atstartof demo and continuing additional 45 min) using OSHA Modified Method 42/47 (3X) Area monitoring using TLD 1 (as necessary) 

### Location: Hot Room (Small Space- 6'x6') Activity: Gunning Product (-20 linerfeet) and Stay in Room Exposure Time: 15 Minutes Type of Monitoring: Personal monitoring (15 minutes) using OSHA Modified Method 42/47 (3X)

Scenario 3 Area TWA monitoring (1 hourbeginning atstartof demo and continuingadditional 45 min) using OSHA Modified Method 42147 (3X) Area monitoring using TLD 1 (as necessary) 

### Location:·Office with similarsize to typical residential room (1O'x12') Activity: Gunning Product (-20 linerfeet) and Stay in Room Exposure Time: 15 Minutes Type of Monitoring Personal monitoring (15 minutes) using OSHA Modified Method 42147 (3X) AreaTWA monitoring (1 hour beginning atstartof demo and continuing additional45 min) using OSHA Modified Method 42/47 (3X) Area monitoring usingTLD 1 (as necessary)

## >SANITIZED VERSION

Location: OutsideApplic;atiC>n Area .> 

### Activity: HorizontalApplicati()n Mock;;,up
. ExposureTime: 1 Hour Type ofM()nitoring: Personal monitoring (1 

### hour) using · · OSHA Modified Method 42147 (3X each) Area monitoring usingTLD 1 (as**necess~ry)**

## SANITIZED VERSION

APPENDIX 3 ! I I INDUSTRIAL HYGIENEMONITORINGRESULTS

## SANITIZED VERSION Jan Koehn, M.S., C!H,<Inc.**8!;32~Kirqyprlve** .•. · ·· Houston,

### TX 77054

(713)**664~1597** FAX (713) 664-6443 

### INDUSTRIAL HYGIENE ANALYTICAL RESJJLTS
DATE: July 

### 14, 2011 CLIENT: BASF Shakopee, MN PROJECT: Representative industrial hygiene personal and

### area monitoring for TDIassociated with otitdoor·Scenario 4: Horizontal Application ofSonoguard Basecoat Product TDI, 2,4- TDI, 2,6- SAMPLE SAMPLE DURATION VOLUME RESULTS RESULTS NUMBER DESCRIPTION (Minutes) {Liters)**~ ~** 



### 4-A-001 Area- 60 69.2 ND**@0.20 0.35 Adjacentto Application 4-P-001 Personal

- (STEL) 15 17.3 

### ND@0.81 ND@ 0.81 Brent Lavasseur 4-A-002 Area- 62 69.4 0.43 15 Adjacent to Application 4-P-002 Personal

- (STEL) 16 18.5 ND@0.76 ND@ 0.76 BrentLavasseur 4-A-003 Area- 62 72.7 ND @0.19 5.4 

### Adjacentto Application 4-P-003 Personal- (STEL) 16 18.5 ND@0.76 ND@0.76 BrentLavasseur
*ppb

- parts per. billion 

## ** ND

- Not Detected atlevel given Method: OSHA 47 & 

### 42 with Modifications CIH # 

### 3600: Jan Koehn, M.S., CIH

## SANITIZED VERSION



# ~c. Jan Koehn, M,S,,()IH, Inc. 8926 Kirby DrlVE:l Houston, TX 77054

(713) 664-1597 FAX (713)664-\)443 

### INDUSTRIALHYGIENE ANALYTICALRESULTS
DATE: July 14. 2011 CLIENT: BASF Shakopee, MN PROJECT: Representative industrialhygienepersonal and area monitoring for TDI associated with Scenario 1: Gunning Cards withSonolasticNP-1 Product TDI, 2,4- TDI, 2,6- SAMPLE SAMPLE DURATION VOLUME RESULTS RESULTS NUMBER DESCRIPTION (Minutes) Qjters)

**~ ~** 

1-A-001 Area- 62 66.8 ND**@ 0.21 ND@0.21 Adjacentto Lab WorkBench 1-P-001 Personal- (STEL) 20 23.8 ND @0.59 ND@ 0.59 John Kalal 1-A-002 Area- 62 66.8 ND@0.21 ND@0.21 Adjacentto Lab WorkBench 1-P-002 Personal- (STEL) 20 23.8 ND@0.59 ND@0.59 JohnKalal 1-A-003 Area- 61 65.8 ND@0.21 ND@0.21 Adjacent to Lab WorkBench 1-P-003 Personal- (STEL) 20 23.8 ND@0.59 ND@0.59 JohnKalal
*ppb

- parts per billion ** ND

- Not Detected at level given Method: OSHA 47 

### &42 with Modifications CIH # 3600: JanKoehn, M.S., CIH

## SANITIZED VERSION 

# J'Ktc. Jan

**K~hn,** M.S,., GIH, Inc. 89?6 Kirby Drive · Houston;TX 77054

(7'13)

**664~1597** FAX {713) 664-6443 

### INDUSTRIAL HYGIENEANALYTICAL RESULTS
DATE: July 

### 14, 2011 CLIENT: BASF Shakopee, MN PROJECT: Representative

**industrial}!ygi~ne** 

### personal and area monitoringfor TDI associated with 

### Scenario 2:· 

### Contricted Space with 

### Sonolastic NP-1 Product TDI, 2,4- 

### TDI, 2,6- SAMPLE SAMPLE DURATION VOLUME RESULTS RESULTS NUMBER DESCRIPTION (Minutes) (Liters)

**~ ~** 



### 2-A-001 Area- 60 68.5 ND**@0.20 2.7 Adjacentto Application 2-P-001 Personal- (STEL) 18 21.7 ND@ 0.65 1.6 BrentLavasseur 2-A-002 Area- 60 68.5 ND@0.20 7.5 Adjacentto Application 2-P-002 Personal- (STEL) 15 18.1 

### ND@ 0.78 3.7 BrentLavasseur 2-A-003 Area- 60 68.5 ND@0.20 7.8 Adjacentto 

### Application 2-P-003 Personal- (STEL) 18 

### 21.7 ND@0.65 2.9 BrentLavasseur 

## *ppb

- parts perbillion 

## ** ND- NotDetected at 

### level given Method: OSHA 47 & 

### 42 with Modifications CIH # 

### 3600: Jan Koehn, M.S., CIH

## SANITIZED VERSION

# ~c. Jan Koehn, M.S., CH-I, Inc, 8.926 Kirby Drive Hot,JSt()n, TX 77054

(7'13)**664~1597** FAX (713) $64-6443 INDUSTRIALHYGIENEANALYTICALRESULTS
DATE: July 14, 2011 CLIENT: BASF Shakopee, MN PROJECT: Representative ind.m;tfial hygienepersonal and areamonitoring for TDI associated with Scenario

### 3: Office Space with Sonolastic NP-1 Product TDI, 2,4- TDI, 2,6- SAMPLE SAMPLE DURATION VOLUME RESULTS RESULTS NUMBER DESCRIPTION (Minutes) (Liters)

### ~**~**

3-A-001 Area- 60 67.4 ND**@ 0.21 1.5 Adjacent to Application 3-P-001 Personal

- (STEL) 16 18.7 ND@0.75 1.0 BrentLavasseur 3-A-002 Area- 60 67.4 ND@0.21 0.92 Adjacentto Application 3-P-002 Personal- (STEL) 15 17.6 ND@0.80 ND@0.80 BrentLavasseur 3-A-003 Area- 60 67.4 ND @0.21 0.93 Adjacentto Application 3-P-003 Personal- (STEL) 16 18.7 ND@ 0.75 0.81 Jay Patel 

## *ppb

- parts

### per billion 

## ** ND

- Not Detected

## at level given Method: OSHA 47 & 42 with Modifications CIH

### # 3600: JanKoehn, M.S., CIH

## SANITIZED VERSION 

# J"Kc.

DATE: CLIENT: INDUSTRIALHYGIENEANALYTICALRESULTS 

### July 14, 2011 BASF Shakopee, MN JanK()ehn, M.S., CIH, Inc. 8926·Kirby Drive Houston,

### TX 77054

(713)

**664~1597** FAX (7"13}664·6443

PROJECT: 

### Representative industrial hygiene personal and 

### area monitoring for TDI TDI,

**2,4~** SAMPLE SAMPLE DURATION VOLUME RESULTS NUMBER DESCRIPTION 

### (M:inutes) (Liters) Field Blankl Field Blank N/A 

### NIA ND**



## *ug - 

### micrograms 

## ** ND

- Not Detected atlevel given Method: OSHA 47 & 42 with 

### Modifications CIH # 

### 3600: JanKoehn, M.S., 

### CIH TDI, 

### 2,6- RESULTS

. (yg!l ND

## SANITIZED VERSION 

# J'"Kc. Jan KoE)hn. tJI.S., CIH,lf'lc. 89213 Kirby Drive Houston, T"X 77054

(713) 664·11597 FAX (713)664-6443 INDUSTRIALHYGIENEANALYTICALRESULTS
DATE: July 14, 2011 CLIENT: BASF Shakopee, MN PROJECT: Representative industrial hygiene personal and areamonitoring for 

### .MDI associated 

### with Scenario 2: Constricted Space 

### with MDl-Based ConstructionAdhesive MDI MDI Trimer SAMPLE SAMPLE DURATION VOLUME RESULTS RESULTS NUMBER DESCRIPTION (Minutes) (Liters)**~ ~** 

2-A-004 Area- 60 68.2 ND**@ 0.14 ND@O.ll Adjacentto Application 2-P-004 Personal- (STEL) 16 19.4 ND@0.50 ND@ 0.40 Rob Ferenz 2-A-005 Area- 60 68.2 ND @0.14 ND@O.ll Adjacentto Application 2-P-005 Personal- (STEL) 15 18.2 ND@0.54 ND@0.42 Patrick Knoll 2-A-006 Area- 60 68.2 ND@ 0.14 ND@O.ll A,djacentto Application 2-P-006 Personal

- (STEL) 18 21.8 ND@0.45 ND@0.35 Patrick Knoll 

## *ppb

- parts perbillion 

# ** ND- NotDetected atlevel given Method: OSHA 47 & 42 

### with Modifications CIH # 3600: 

### Jan Koehn, M.S., CIH

## SANITIZED VERSION Jan Koehn, 

### rvts., CiH,**Inc~** 8926 Kirby Dove Houston,

### TX 77054

(71.3).664-**~. ~97**  FAX (713)**664~6443** INDUSTRIALHXGIENEANALYTICALREsULTS·
DATE: July 14, 2011 CLIENT: BASF Shakopee, MN PROJECT: Representative industrialhygiene personal arid areamonitoring for MDI associated with Scenario 3: Office Space withMDI-Based Construction Adhesive MDI MDI Trimer SAMPLE SAMPLE DURATION VOLUME RESULTS RESULTS NUMBER DESCRIPTION (Minutes) (Liters)**~ ~** 

3-A-004 Area- 60 68.4 ND**@ 0.14 ND@O.ll Adjacent to Application 3-P-004 Personal

- (STEL) 18 20.5 ND@0.48 ND@0.38 Rob Ferenz 3-A-005 Area- 60 68.4 ND@0.14 ND@O.ll Adjacent to Application 3-P-005 Personal

- (STEL) 15 17.1 ND@0.57 ND@ 0.45 Rob Ferenz 3-A-006 Area- 60 68.4 ND@0.14 ND@ 0.11 Adjacentto Application 3-P-006 Personal

- (STEL) 18 I 20,5 ND@0.48 ND@ 0.38 Rob Ferenz 

## *ppb

- parts perbillion 

## ** ND- Not Detected at level given Method: OSHA47 & 42 with Modifications CIH 

### # 3600: Jan Koehn. M.S., CIH

## SANITIZED VERSION 

# :fK?c.

INDUSTRIALHYGIENE ANALYI'ICAL RESULTS.


### DATE: CLIENT: 

### July 14, 2011 BASF Shakopee, MN PROJECT: 

### Representativeindustrial hygiene monitoring

### for MDI
SAMPLE NUMBER Field Blank2 

### SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Field Blank



## *ug - micrograms ** ND -NotDetected at level given DURATION VOLUME (Minutes) (Liters) N/A N/A

Method: OSHA 47 & 42 with Modifications 

### CIH # 

### 3600: Jan 

### Koehn, M.S., CIH Jan**Ko~hn,** M.S., CIH
.. IIJc, 8926 Kirby Drive.· ·· Houston, TX 170.54

(713) 664-:-1597 FAX {7'13) 664-6443



### MDI RESULTS MDI Trimer RESULTS**~ ~**  

### ND** ND

## SANITIZED VERSION 

# Jl(hc. Jan koehn, M.S., CIH, Inc. 8926 Kirby Drive Houston, TX 770$4

(713)**664~1597.** FAX (713) 664-6443 

### INDUstRIALHYGIENE ANALYTICALRESULTS
DATE: CLIENT: 

### July 14, 2011 BASF Shakopee, MN PROJECT: Representative industrialhygiene personal and areamonitoring for 

### TDI associated with Scenario 2: Constricted Space and MOl-Based ConstructionAdhesive SAMPLE NUMBER SAMPLE DESCRIPTION 2-A-004 AreaAdjacentto Application 2-A-005 Area

- Adjacent tO Application 2-A-006 Area

- Adjacentto Application FieldBlank2 Field Blank



## *ppb

- parts perbillion ** ND- Not Detected atlevel given 

## *** ug- micrograms DURATION <Minutes) 60
60
60
N/A

Method: OSHA 47 & 42 with Modifications CIH

### # 3600: Jan Koehn, M.S., CIH TDI, 2,6- VOLUME RESULTS

(Liters)**~**

68.2 

### 1.5
68.2 0.75
68.2 0.67
N/A NO** (ug***)

## SANITIZED VERSION

APPENDIX 4 LABORATORYANALYTICALRESULTDOCUMENTATIONLab Contact: Lab Reference: Projectcode: Site: Requestor: Date Received: Sample Media: Analyte: Method:

4-A-001 4-P-001 4-A-002 4-P-002 4-A-003 4-P-003 1-A-001 1-P-001 1-A-002 1-P-002 1-A-003 1-P-003 2-A-001 2-P-001 2-A-002 2-P-002 2-A-003 2-P-003 3-A-001 3-P-001 3-A-002 3-P-002 3-A-003 3-P-003 Field Blank1 

## SANITIZED VERSION

. .... .



### ·BASF Industrial•Hygiene LaboratorY Report .1609 BiddleAve, Wyandotte Ml 48192 11-August-2011 E. Hugel (734) 324-6320
.**11~100** (LIM$ 2011002069) U$270015 (60035930) 

### ShakQpee Dave Ehlers 20-July-2011 13mm 1,2-pp GFF (061511) TDI, MDI & MDI Trimer OSHA42 & 47* (modifications include include 13mm 1,2-pp GFF; field desorbed)

111268 69.2 ND N0@0.20 0.17 0.35 111269 17.3 ND ND@0.81 ND ND@0.81 111270 69.4 0.21 0.43 7.2 15 111271 18.5 ND ND@0.76 ND ND@0.76 111272 72.7 NO N0@0.19 2.8 5.4 111273 18.5 ND N0@0.76 NO N0@0.76 111274 66.8 NO N0@0.21 NO N0@0.21 111275 23.8 NO N0@0.59 ND ND@0.59 111276 66.8 NO NO@ 0.21 NO ND@0.21 111277 23.8 NO ND@0.59 ND N0@0.59 111278 65.8 ND N0@0.21 NO N0@0.21 111279 23.8 NO N0@0.59 ND N0@0.59 111280 68.5 NO N0@0.20 1.3 2.7 111281 21.7 ND N0@0.65 0.24 1.6 111282 68.5 ND N0@0.20 3.7 7.5 111283 18.1 NO NO@ 0.78 0.48 3.7 111284 68.5 ND N0@0.20 3.8 7.8 111285 21.7 ND ND@0.65 0.44 2.9 111292 67.4 NO ND@0.21 0.71 1.5 111293 18.7 NO N0@0.75 0.14 1.0 111294 67.4 ND N0@0.21 0.44 0.92 111295 17.6 ND N0@0.80 NO ND@0.80 111296 67.4 NO ND@0.21 0.45 0.93 111297 18.7 NO ND@0.75 0.11 0.81 111304 0 NO NA NO NA

Robert laney

Analyst JH labSupervisor p. 1of3

## SANITIZEDVERSION**,;:';:!;~:;!,:;:,'): 2~A-004**  111286 68.2 ND ND @0,14 NO ND @0.11 2-P-004 111287 19.4 NO ND@0.50 ND ND@0.40 2-A-005 111288 68.2 NO ND@0.14 ND ND@ 0.11 2-P-005 111289 18.2 ND NO@ 0.54 NO N0@0.42 2-A-006 111290 68.2 ND N0@0.14 

## NO NO@ 0.11 2-P-006 111291 21.8 NO NO@ 0.45 NO N0@0.35 3-A-004 111298 68.4 ND ND@0.14 ND ND@ 0.11**3-P~oo4** 111299 20.5 NO ND@ 0.48 NO N0@0.38 3-A-005 111300 68.4 ND ND@0.14 NO NO@ 0,11 3-P-:005 111301 17.1 NO ND@0.57 ND ND@0.45**3-A~006** 111302 68.4 ND ND@0.14 ND ND@ 0.11 3-P-006 111303 20.5 NO ND@0.48 ND ND@0.38 Field Blank2 111305 0 NO NA NO NA

Several samples submitted for MDI analysis showed the presence of2,-6-TOI, which was quantified.

2-A-004 2-A-005 2-A-006 Field Blank2

Notes: TDI, 2,4-**[584-84-~]** 111286 111288 111290 111305 68.2 68.2 68.2

0 0.71 0.36 0.33 NO 1.5 0.75 0.67 NA

(1) ND = Not detected at level given. Detection limit is 0.10 IJQ. (2) Recovery for QC sampleswas 1 00%; QC spike was 1.7 IJQ. (3) Concentration calculated: ppb = Weight(f,.lg)/174.15 x 24.45 x 1000Nolume(L) (4) NA=Notapplicable.
TDI, 2,6-**(91-(18~7)**

(1) ND

## =Not detected at level given. Detection limit is 0.10 1-19· (2) Recovery for QC sampleswas 105%; QC spike was 1,7 IJQ. (3) Concentration calculated: ppb 

### =**Weight(~o~g)/17**4.15 x 24.45 x 1OOONolume(L) (4) Samples are not corrected for> 100% QC recovery. (5) NA

# = Not applicable. Robert Laney Elizabeth Hugel

Analyst IH Lab Supervisor p. 2of3

# . ' 

## SANITIZED VERSION

MDI (101-68·8)

(1) NO= Not detected at level given. Detection limit is 0.10 J.IQ. (2) Recovery for QC sampleswas 99%; QC spike was 2.2 J.JQ. (3) Concentration calculated: ppb 

### =Weight(J.Jg)/250.26 x 24.45

### x 1 OOONolume(L) (4) NA =Notapplicable.

MDI Trimer [NA]

(1) NO= Not detected at level given. Detection limit is 0.12 J.lg. (2) Recovery for QC samples was 97%; QC spike was 1.2 J.JQ. (3) Concentration calculated: ppb = Weight(IJg)/381.4 x 24.45 x 1000Nolume(L) (4} NA =Notapplicable.

Robert Laney Elizabeth Hugel ,,-•, '' " ' '**~** ·. 4 _., >.,>' IH Lab Supervisor '•. ,• I,;' l,; ) Analyst p. 3of3

## paZ!l!UBS **Auedwo~**