alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 63597.

protests 58/19909, etc. (New York).

#### Baltic Trading Co., Ltd., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that an allowance was made for gelatinous substance on certain canned hams and similar pork products equal to 8 or 10 percent of the contents of the tins, whereas there should have been an allowance of 12 percent. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following *Axel Stokby et al.*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 343, C.D. 358), the merchandise was held dutiable at 3% cents per pound under paragraph 703, Tariff Act of 1930, upon the basis of the net weight of the contents of the tins, less an allowance for gelatinous substance equal to 12 percent of the content of each tin.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

DARRICK U. HALL, )

 ) Civil Action

Petitioner ) No. 05-cv-02523

 )

vs. )

 ) 

JEFFREY BEARD, Commissioner, )

Pennsylvania Department of )

Corrections; )

DAVID DiGUGLIELMO, Superintendent )

of the State Correctional )

Institution at Graterford; and )

FRANKLIN J. TENNIS, Superintendent )

of the State Correctional )

Institution at Rockview, )

 )

Respondents )

O R D E R

NOW, this 21 day of October, 2014, upon consideration st

of the following documents:

(1) Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus dated and

filed on February 17, 2006; 

(2) Answer to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus

filed by respondents on May 30, 2006; 

(3) Petitioner’s Memorandum of Law in Support of

Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus filed on

October 6, 2006;

(4) Memorandum in Law in Support of the

Commonwealth’s Answer to Petition for Writ of

Habeas Corpus filed on December 6, 2006;

(5) Petitioner’s Reply to Commonwealth’s

Memorandum of Law in Support of

Commonwealth’s Answer to Petition for a Writ

of Habeas Corpus filed on January 8, 2007; 

Case 2:05-cv-02523-JKG Document 32 Filed 10/22/14 Page 1 of 2
upon consideration of the pleadings, exhibits, and record papers;

after oral argument held May 17, 2007; and for the reasons

articulated in the accompanying Opinion, 

IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas

Corpus is granted in part and denied in part.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner’s death sentence

is vacated.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the execution of the writ of

habeas corpus is stayed for 180 days from the date of this Order

to permit the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania to grant petitioner a

new sentencing hearing.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that in all other respects the

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that if any party requires a

certificate of appealability under 28 U.S.C. § 2253, they may

file a motion requesting the issuance of such a certificate no

later than November 21, 2014. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall

close this case for statistical purposes. 

BY THE COURT:

/s/ JAMES KNOLL GARDNER 

James Knoll Gardner

United States District Judge

-iiCase 2:05-cv-02523-JKG Document 32 Filed 10/22/14 Page 2 of 2
No. 53476.

protests 143384-K, etc. (Los Angeles).

#### Edw. & John Burke et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
November 4, 1954

No. 58492.

Suit 4825.

#### United States *v.*Max Rosenberg.

C. D. 1616. (Appeal dismissed September 15, 1954.)
# Department

# Independent Agencies
Part 1 DRAFT Fiscal Year 2022 Reporting 

SUPPLEMENT Section VII 

U.S. Standard General Ledger 

Closing Edits Detail Report 

Bulletin No. 2022-16 DRAFT VII CER - 8 IRC Handout 8/17/22

Closing Rule Number: 21.436000 

Closing USSGL Account: 436000 Appropriation Purpose Fulfilled - Balance Not Available 

Calculated Preclosing Balance 436000 Beginning Balance 

USSGL Account 

Number Begin/End Indicator 

USSGL Account 

Number Begin/End Indicator 

436000 E 436000 B 

436001 E 

 

Closing Rule Number: 21.438400 

Closing USSGL Account: 438400 Temporary Reduction/Cancellation Returned by Appropriation 

Calculated Preclosing Balance 438400 Beginning Balance 

USSGL Account 

Number Begin/End Indicator 

USSGL Account 

Number Begin/End Indicator 

412100 E 438400 B 

412300 E 

412400 E 

416800 E 

435700 E 

438200 E 

438300 E 

438400 E 

438500 E 

 

Closing Rule Number: 21.439400 

Closing USSGL Account: 439400 Receipts Unavailable for Obligation Upon Collection 

Calculated Preclosing Balance 439400 Beginning Balance 

USSGL Account 

Number Begin/End Indicator 

USSGL Account 

Number Begin/End Indicator 

439400 E 439400 B 

439412 E 

439600 E 

 

Closing Rule Number: 21.439401 

Closing USSGL Account: 439401 Daily Inflation/Deflation Compensation Adjustment - Unavailable 

Calculated Preclosing Balance 439401 Beginning Balance 

USSGL Account 

Number Begin/End Indicator 

USSGL Account 

Number Begin/End Indicator 

439401 E 439401 B 

439402 E 

 

Closing Rule Number: 21.439402 

Closing USSGL Account: 439402 Daily Inflation/Deflation Compensation Adjustment - Previously Unavailable 

Calculated Preclosing Balance 439402 Beginning Balance 

USSGL Account 

Number Begin/End Indicator 

USSGL Account 

Number Begin/End Indicator 

439402 E 439402 B
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003



The undersigned executive officers of the Registrant hereby certify that this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended December 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



By:

/s/ Gary C. LoraditchName:

Gary C. LoraditchTitle:

PresidentBy:

/s/ Bonnie M. KleinName:

Bonnie M. KleinTitle:

Vice President and Treasurer




Date: April 6, 2005
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

SCOTT RUFFING, et al : CIVIL ACTION

Plaintiff :

: NO. 02-CV-4422

 vs. :

:

KALMAR INDUSTRIES, U.S.A., INC., et al :

Defendant :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 4th day of June, 2003, upon consideration of the Motion of

Defendant KI-NJ, LLC for a 60-Day Continuance of the Deadlines Set Forth in the May 14,

2003 Scheduling Order (Document No. 18), it is ORDERED that the motion is DENIED.

BY THE COURT:

 

TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE, J.

Case 2:02-cv-04422-TJS Document 19 Filed 06/04/2003 Page 1 of 1
No. P68/253.

protests 61/12189, etc. (Philadelphia).

No. P68/254.

protest 62/4300 (Philadelphia).

No. P68/255.

protests 66/50358 and 66/13137 (New York).

#### Globe Importing Company et al. *v.*United States, Hancock Gross Mfg., Inc. *v.*United States, Durst Industries, Inc., and Globe Importing Company *v.*United States,

Beckworth, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of strainers in chief value of brass similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Davies, Turner & Company*v. *United States*(55 Cust. Ct. 488, Abstract 69651), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Amendment to the Revolving Credit and Security Agreement dated March 4, 2008



 Exhibit 10.24 
 

 
 March 4, 2008 
 Franklin
Electronic Publishers, Inc. 
 Franklin Electronic Publishers (Europe) Ltd. 
 Franklin Electronic Publishers (Deutschland) GmbH 
 One Franklin Plaza 
 Burlington, New Jersey 08016-4908 
 Attention: Frank Musto 
  

	Re:	Extension of Expiration Date for $20,000,000.00 Committed Line of Credit 

 Dear Mr. Musto: 
 We are writing to inform you that your committed line of credit has been temporarily extended pending
further credit review and approval. The Expiration Date, as set forth in that certain Revolving Credit and Security Agreement dated December 7, 2004, and in the Revolving Credit Note executed and delivered pursuant to that Letter Agreement, has
been extended from March 6, 2008 to May 6, 2008, effective on March 7, 2008. All other terms and conditions of the Committed Line of Credit Note and the Letter Agreement remain in full force and effect. 
 It has been a pleasure working with you and I look forward to a continued successful relationship. Thank you again for your business. 
  

			
	Very truly yours,
	
	PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
		
	By: 	 	/s/ Lori S. Franzon
		 	Lori S. Franzon
		 	Vice President
Part 2

SUPPLEMENT

LineNo.

USSGLAcct. USSGL Account Title Debit/Credit Begin/End Auth Type Code Fed/NonFBudgetary resources:

10201020 414600 Actual Repayments of Debt, Current-Year Authority D/C E P/S 

1020 414600 Actual Repayments of Debt, Current-Year Authority D/C E B 

12901290 415700 Authority Made Available From Receipt or Appropriation 

Balances Previously Precluded From Obligation

D/C E P 

14901490 404700 Anticipated Transfers to the General Fund of the Treasury - 

Current-Year Authority

D/C E B 

USSGL Crosswalk - Statement of Budgetary Resources

Adjustment to unobligated balance brought forward, Oct 1 (+ or -) Appropriations (discretionary and mandatory)Borrowing authority (discretionary and mandatory)

Bulletin No. 2015-04 Draft V-58
Before the First Division,

October 6, 1954

No. 58412.

protests 212416-K, 220492-K, and 220493-K (Milwaukee).

#### M. D. Orum Company *v.*United States,

*373Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the articles in question are the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 57682, the merchandise imported prior to October 1, 1951, was held dutiable at 2 cents per pound, but not less than 15 percent nor more than 45 percent ad valorem, under paragraph 397, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 51802), and the articles imported on or after October 1, 1951, were held dutiable at 2 cents per pound, but not less than 15 percent nor more than 30 percent ad valorem, under said paragraph, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 52739), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T. D. 52820).
eet IPAC Operational Metrics for June 2021
Volume by Transaction Type

Dollar Amount] % of Total Dollar Amount] ‘Number of Transactions] _ 5 of Total Number of Transactions|
[Fiduciary (investment & Borrowing) 19,376,489,461,937 99.7% 20,904 17.44%
[Buy/Sell 35,937 438,702 0.19%] 37,643| 31.48%
[Benefits (RITS) 7,787,674,681| 0.0856] 483] 0.41%]
[Check Aftermath (TRACS) 281,736,501| 0.0054] 356 0.7156
Zero Dollar | 0.0056]
[Grand Total -June 2021 19,420,496,312,221| '100.00%|
[Grand Total - May 2021 16,703,672,306,045| '100.00%|

[May to June Change 2,716,824,006,176|
Percentage Change 16.3%|
[Grand Total - June 2020 18,299,391,633,574|
[June 2020 to June 2021 Change 1,121, 104,678,648]

Percentage Change

6.15
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 2SUPPLEMENT	&"Arial,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2019 ReportingSection VII

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2018-05	&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000DRAFT&K000000 VII VDR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout 4/26/18
No. 56366.

protest 176651-K (New York).

#### M. Rothschild & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

From an examination of the papers in the case the court was unable to find anything to overcome the presumption of correctness of the collector’s classification. The protest was therefore overruled.
QT pacaee:

IPAC Operational Metrics for October 2020

Volume by Transaction Type

Dollar Amount] ‘% of Total Dollar Amount] Number of Transactions] _ % of Total Number of Transactions|
Fiduciary (investment & Borrowing) 17,702,773,981,632| 99.653 16,681] 14.93%
Buy/Sell 53,763, 743,739] 0.30%] 93,846] 01%)
Benefits (RITS) 7,854 369,173} 0.04%) 373 0.34%)
|Check Aftermath (TRACS) 107,195,115} 0.0056] 806] 0.72%)
|Zero Doltar 9 0.00%] ol 0.00%)
|Grand Total - October 2020 17,764,499,289,660! 100.00%6| 111,712) 100.00%|
|Grand Total - September 2020 16,994,308,937,159| 100.006 153,201) 100.00%6|
[September to October Change 70,190,352,503 es)
[Percentage Change a5 po 227.56)
[Grand Total - October 2019 17,088,377,168,318| ee)
[Oct 2019 to Oct 2020 Change 676,122,121,343| jf
a 4.0% {0.3
# sf133_schp--OUTPUT

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2022-12	&"Arial,Bold"&9V SF 133/Sch P - &P	&"Arial,Bold"&10IRC Handout April 20, 2022
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

BARBAROTTO : CIVIL ACTION

:

 :

 v. :

:

 : 

HERSHEY : NO.02-4389

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 4th day of September, 2002, in accordance with the court's

procedure for random reassignment of cases, it is hereby

ORDERED that the above-captioned case is reassigned from the calendar of

the Honorable Lowell A. Reed, Jr. to the calendar of the Honorable Timothy J. Savage.

 FOR THE COURT:

 JAMES T. GILES 

 Chief Judge

 ATTEST:

 ___________________

 MICHAEL E. KUNZ

 Clerk of Court

Case 2:02-cv-04389-TJS Document 8 Filed 09/04/2002 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 12.2  I, Stephen Pearce, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 20-F of Golden Goliath Resources Ltd.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The companys other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.   Date: February 6, 2012   /s/ Stephen Pearce Stephen Pearce, Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 150 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 150

To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide an additional tool to 
    prevent certain frauds against veterans, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 17, 2017

   Mr. Rubio introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 18, United States Code, to provide an additional tool to 
    prevent certain frauds against veterans, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Preventing Crimes Against Veterans 
Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. ADDITIONAL TOOL TO PREVENT CERTAIN FRAUDS AGAINST VETERANS.

    (a) In General.--Chapter 47 of title 18, United States Code, is 
amended by adding at the end the following:
``Sec. 1041. Fraud regarding veterans' benefits
    ``(a) Whoever knowingly engages in any scheme or artifice to 
defraud an individual of veterans' benefits, or in connection with 
obtaining veteran's benefits for that individual, shall be fined under 
this title, imprisoned for not more than 5 years, or both.
    ``(b) In this section--
            ``(1) the term `veteran' has the meaning given that term in 
        section 101 of title 38; and
            ``(2) the term `veterans' benefits' means any benefit 
        provided under Federal law for a veteran or a dependent or 
        survivor of a veteran.''.
    (b) Clerical Amendment.--The table of sections for chapter 47 of 
title 18, United States Code, is amended by adding at the end the 
following new item:

``1041. Fraud regarding veterans' benefits.''.
                                 <all>
```
Part 2 Fiscal Year 2021 Reporting

SUPPLEMENT Section IV

U.S. Standard General Ledger - Account Attribute Definition Report

Attribute Name Short

Name Attribute Definition Domain SystemChars Reference SuppliedBy

IRC Handout April 2020

Credit Cohort Year Cohort Yr Fiscal year when direct loans are obligated or guarantees 

committed by a program, even if disbursements occur in 

subsequent fiscal years.

1001 - OPIC Working Capital,

1992-2021 2022

4/N OMB Circ. 

No. A-11

Bulk File

Disaster Emergency Fund 

Code

DEFC Distinguishes whether the budgetary resources, obligations 

incurred, unobligated and obligated balances, and outlays are 

classified as disaster, emergency, wildfire suppression or 

none of the three. Note - Once one of the three has been 

identified, the title "Disaster/Emergency/Wildfire 

Suppression", for example, will be replaced with the actual 

title identified by OMB such as "Emergency PL 115-56."

A - Emergency PL 115-56,

B - Emergency PL 115-72,

C - Emergency PL 115-123,

D - Emergency PL 115-254,

E - Emergency PL 116-20,

F - Emergency PL 116-26,

G - Emergency PL 116-93,

H - Disaster PL 116-93,

I - Emergency PL 116-94,

J - Wildfire Suppression PL 116-

94,

K - Emergency PL 116-113,

L – Disaster/Emergency/Wildfire 

Suppression Emergency PL 116-

123,

M - Disaster/Emergency/Wildfire 

Suppression Emergency PL 116-

127,

N - Disaster/Emergency/Wildfire 

Suppression Emergency PL 116-

136,

O - Disaster/Emergency/Wildfire 

Suppression Nonemergency PL 

116-136,

P - Disaster/Emergency/Wildfire 

Suppression,

Q - Non Disaster or Emergency,

R - Disaster/Emergency/Wildfire 

Suppression,

S - Disaster/Emergency/Wildfire 

Suppression,

T - Disaster/Emergency/Wildfire 

Suppression

1/A OMB 

Guidance/TF

M

Bulk File
exv10w3





Exhibit 10.3




FIRST AMENDMENT TO

AMENDED AND RESTATED SERVICE AGREEMENT




     THIS FIRST AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED SERVICE AGREEMENT (“Amendment”) is entered into
by and between Bank Machine Limited (the “Company”) and Ron Delnevo (the “Executive”).



     WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive have heretofore entered into that certain Amended and
Restated Service Agreement dated as of May 17, 2005 (the “Service Agreement”); and



     WHEREAS, the Company and the Executive desire to amend the Service Agreement in certain
respects.



     NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises set forth above and the mutual agreements set
forth herein, the Company and the Executive hereby agree, effective as of the date first set forth
above, that the Service Agreement shall be and is hereby amended as hereafter provided:



     1. Section 2.2 of the Service Agreement shall be deleted and the following shall be
substituted therefor:




“2.2 The Executive’s employment under this Agreement commenced on the Effective
Date and shall terminate automatically on June 5, 2011, unless terminated earlier in
accordance with this Agreement.”



     2. The first sentence of Section 5.1 of the Service Agreement shall be deleted and the
following shall be substituted therefor:




“The Executive shall receive a fixed annual salary of £186,323 which shall accrue
from day to day and be payable by equal monthly installments in arrears on or before
the last day of each calendar month or such salary as may be agreed and confirmed to
the Executive in writing by the Company in its sole discretion from time to time.”



     3. This Amendment (a) shall supersede any prior agreement between the Company and the
Executive relating to the subject matter of this Amendment and (b) shall be binding upon and inure
to the benefit of the parties hereto and any successors to the Company and all persons lawfully
claiming under the Executive.



     4. Except as expressly modified by this Amendment, the terms of the Service Agreement shall
remain in full force and effect and are hereby confirmed and ratified.



     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed and delivered this Amendment on this the
5th day of June, 2008.



	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	“EXECUTIVE”	 	“COMPANY”	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	BANK MACHINE LIMITED	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Ron Delnevo
 

Ron Delnevo

	 	By:

Name:
	 	/s/ Michael E. Keller
 

Michael E. Keller
	 	 
	 

	 	Title:
	 	Director
Order issued October 11, 2018 withdrawn; Replaced by this Order filed 

November 29, 2018.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-18-00318-CV

___________

LONE STAR PAVERS INC., Appellant

V.

JOSE MURILLO, Appellee

On Appeal from the 151st District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 321010151

O R D E R

On October 11, 2018 this court issued an order in error. That order is 

withdrawn. This order is filed in its place. 

No reporter’s record has been filed in this case. The official court reporter 

for the 151st District Court informed this court that appellant had not made 

arrangements for payment for the reporter’s record. On September 6, 2018 the 

clerk of this court notified appellant that we would consider and decide those 

issues that do not require a reporter’s record unless appellant, within 15 days of 
notice, provided this court with proof of payment for the record. See Tex. R. App.

P. 37.3(c). Appellant filed no reply. 

Accordingly, we order appellant to file a brief in this appeal by December 

13, 2018. If appellant fails to comply with this order, the court will dismiss the 

appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b). 

PER CURIAM