alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PINNACL E 

. . ' i"',.')-''i,',Ti/". ; .f • 

;! r-.V ' 2 A ':: Uq 

Pinnacle Airlines, Inc. 

1689 Nonconnah Blvd. 

Suite i n 

Memphis, TN 38132 

flypinnacle.com 

901.348.4100 

Fax901.34a4130 

April 27, 2011 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations 

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Dear Sir / Madam: 

Please withdraw Docket ID FAA-2001-8762-0014 for exemption 5515, as it was 

submitted in error. 

Respectfully submitted, 

Santi Lombardo 

Director, Operations 

cc: Dan Morgan 

Robert Muhs 

Craig Chilcote 

Paul Wroble 

Russ Elander 

Michael Costa - FAA 

Don Curry - FAA 

Scott Wirebaugh - FAA
# C_2018072EN.01003402.xml

| 26.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 72/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 72/34

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 January 2018 — Starbucks v EUIPO — Nersesyan (COFFEE ROCKS)

(Case T-398/16) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark COFFEE ROCKS - Earlier EU figurative marks STARBUCKS COFFEE - Relative ground for refusal - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)))

(2018/C 072/44)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Starbucks Corp. (Seattle, Washington, United States) (represented by: J. Schmitt, lawyer, and I. Fowler, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo and A. Kusturovic, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Hasmik Nersesyan (Borgloon, Belgium)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 May 2016 (Case R 559/2015-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Starbucks Corp. and Ms Hasmik Nersesyan.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 24 May 2016 (Case R 559/2015-4); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 24 May 2016 (Case R 559/2015-4);

| 2. | Orders EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders EUIPO to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 335, 12.9.2016.

1

---
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-40609 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RICARDO BEDOLLA DE LA TORRE, also known as ENRIQUE URISTA-ALVARADO, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. M-97-CR-54-1

- - - - - - - - - - February 11, 1998 Before SMITH, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Appellant Ricardo Bedolla De La Torre (Bedolla) appeals his conviction and sentence for illegal re-entry following deportation in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Bedolla argues that he was sentenced under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) for a prior aggravated felony conviction and since he was charged and pleaded guilty to 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a), the Government should have alleged the prior aggravated felony in the indictment. His argument isNo. 97-40609 -2- foreclosed by this court’s opinion in United States v. Vasquez-Olvera , 999 F.2d 943, 946-47 (5th Cir. 1993).
AFFIRMED.
PLAINTIFF

 VS.

DEFENDANT

CIVIL ACTION NO.

ATTACHMENT INCORRECT

Case 2:05-cv-02752-HB Document 34-1 Filed 12/19/05 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA, :

: CIVIL ACTION

Plaintiff :

: No. 05-CV-5317

v. :

:

D.C. and J.C. on behalf of their daughter, E.C., a minor, :

:

Defendants :

 

D.C. and J.C. on behalf of their daughter, E.C., a minor, :

:

Defendants and Counterclaimants :

:

v. :

:

THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA :

:

and :

:

JAMES E. NEVELS, Chairman, School Reform :

Commission, School District of Philadelphia :

:

and :

:

PAUL VALLAS, Chief Executive Officer for the School :

District of Philadelphia :

:

and :

:

THERESA HARRINGTON , Special Education Case :

Manager for the Northwest Region of the School District :

of Philadelphia, :

:

Counterdefendants :

Case 2:05-cv-05317-JG Document 5-1 Filed 11/28/05 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Nancy C. Ryan, Esquire, hereby certify that on this date, November 28, 2005, a true and

correct copy of the foregoing Defendants’ Answer to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses was

served upon counsel listed below by United States First Class Mail, postage pre-paid, and

addressed as follows:

Miles H. Shore, Esquire

C. Reginald Johnson, Esquire

School District of Philadelphia

Office of General Counsel

440 North Broad Street, 3rd Floor

Philadelphia, PA 19130

/s/ Nancy Ryan 

 Nancy C. Ryan, Esquire

November 28, 2005

Case 2:05-cv-05317-JG Document 5-1 Filed 11/28/05 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 23.1** **CONSENT    OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**     The Board of Directors of Husky Energy Inc.     We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration    Statement    (No. 333-137211)    on    Form F-9    of Husky Energy Inc. and inclusion in this annual report on    Form 40-F    of:     •     our audit report dated February 5, 2007 on the consolidated    balance sheets of Husky Energy Inc. as at December 31,    2006, 2005 and 2004 and the consolidated statements of earnings,    retained earnings and cash flows for each of the years in the    three year period ended December 31, 2006,     •     our Comments by Auditors for United States Readers on    Canada-United States Reporting Differences, dated    February 5, 2007,     •     our Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm    dated February 5, 2007 on management’s assessment of    the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting    as of December 31, 2006 and the effectiveness of internal    control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006,     each of which is contained in this annual report on    Form 40-F    of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006.     /s/ KPMG llp        KPMG llp        Chartered Accountants    Calgary, Canada    March 13, 2007
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001051828
<NAME>                        MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING IV, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                   485,253
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               485,253
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 485,253
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    412,372
<COMMON>                                        72,881
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   485,253
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 8,613
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,613
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,613
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,613
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
Exhibit 13.1

Officer Certifications

Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United
States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of
title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of América Móvil, S.A.B. de C.V., a sociedad anónima bursátil de capital variable organized under the laws of Mexico (the Company), does
hereby certify to such officers knowledge that:

The annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 (the
Form 20-F) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: April 29, 2013



/s/ Daniel Hajj AboumradDaniel Hajj AboumradChief Executive Officer


Dated: April 29, 2013



/s/ Carlos José García Moreno ElizondoCarlos José García Moreno ElizondoChief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 34 Filed 04/29/05 Page 1 of 38
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 34 Filed 04/29/05 Page 2 of 38
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 34 Filed 04/29/05 Page 3 of 38
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 34 Filed 04/29/05 Page 4 of 38
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 34 Filed 04/29/05 Page 5 of 38
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 34 Filed 04/29/05 Page 6 of 38
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 34 Filed 04/29/05 Page 7 of 38
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 34 Filed 04/29/05 Page 8 of 38
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 34 Filed 04/29/05 Page 9 of 38
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 34 Filed 04/29/05 Page 10 of 38
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 34 Filed 04/29/05 Page 11 of 38
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 34 Filed 04/29/05 Page 12 of 38
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 34 Filed 04/29/05 Page 13 of 38
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 34 Filed 04/29/05 Page 14 of 38
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 34 Filed 04/29/05 Page 15 of 38
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 34 Filed 04/29/05 Page 16 of 38
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 34 Filed 04/29/05 Page 17 of 38
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 34 Filed 04/29/05 Page 18 of 38
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 34 Filed 04/29/05 Page 19 of 38
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 34 Filed 04/29/05 Page 20 of 38
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 34 Filed 04/29/05 Page 21 of 38
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 34 Filed 04/29/05 Page 22 of 38
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 34 Filed 04/29/05 Page 23 of 38
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 34 Filed 04/29/05 Page 24 of 38
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 34 Filed 04/29/05 Page 25 of 38
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 34 Filed 04/29/05 Page 26 of 38
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 34 Filed 04/29/05 Page 27 of 38
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 34 Filed 04/29/05 Page 28 of 38
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 34 Filed 04/29/05 Page 29 of 38
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 34 Filed 04/29/05 Page 30 of 38
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 34 Filed 04/29/05 Page 31 of 38
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 34 Filed 04/29/05 Page 32 of 38
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 34 Filed 04/29/05 Page 33 of 38
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 34 Filed 04/29/05 Page 34 of 38
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 34 Filed 04/29/05 Page 35 of 38
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 34 Filed 04/29/05 Page 36 of 38
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 34 Filed 04/29/05 Page 37 of 38
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 34 Filed 04/29/05 Page 38 of 38
EXHIBIT 99.1







        CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350
               OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE


I, Jonathan P. Ward, the chief executive officer of The  ServiceMaster  Company,
certify that (i) the  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter  ended June
30, 2002,  fully  complies  with  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information  contained in such Form
10-Q fairly  presents,  in all material  respects,  the financial  condition and
results of operations of The ServiceMaster Company.








                                                 /S/Jonathan P. Ward
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                                    Jonathan P. Ward
                                                     August 13, 2002




                                       25
<PAGE>
exhibit10_7.htm


    EXHIBIT
10.7


      AMENDMENT
NO. 2

      TO

      ANALYSTS
INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

      RESTATED
SPECIAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN

      


      


      WHEREAS, Analysts
International Corporation (the “Company”) previously established the Restated
Special Executive Retirement Plan (the “Plan”), originally effective as of June
21, 1984, which has been amended from time to time, and which was most recently
restated generally effective January 1, 2005, and amended effective September 1,
2007;  and

      


      WHEREAS, the Compensation
Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company has designated certain
additional officers as eligible to participate in the Plan, at varying
participation rates, and desires to amend the Plan to reflect such changes in
participation;

      


      NOW, THEREFORE, the
undersigned, acting pursuant to the provisions of Section 10(k) of the Plan
hereby amends the Plan, effective as of June 23, 2008:

      


      1.           Exhibit
A to the Plan is hereby replaced with a new Exhibit A, which is attached hereto
and incorporated herein by reference.  Such Exhibit A shall remain in
full force and effect until further modified by the Compensation Committee of
the Board of Directors of the Company.

      


      2.           Except
as herein amended or modified, all provisions of the Plan shall remain in full
force and effect.

      


      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the
Company has executed this amendment on this ____ day of July 2008.

      


      ANALYSTS INTERNATIONAL
CORPORATION

      


      


      By:                                                                           

           Its:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JEFFREY LILY :

: CIVIL ACTION

v. :

ALDI, INC. : NO. 02-CV-2784

ORDER

AND NOW, this 28th day of February, 2003, upon consideration of the unopposed

Motion by Jeffrey Lily Requesting an Extension of All Pre-Trial and Trial Deadlines (Doc. No.

11) and counsel having requested a settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge, it is

ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED as follows:

1. Plaintiff’s expert reports shall be exchanged no later than March 18, 2003;

2. Defendant’s expert reports shall be exchanged no later than April 30, 2003;

3. Dispositive motions shall be filed no later than May 31, 003;

4. Responses to such motions shall be filed no later than June 15, 2003;

5. This case will be placed in the Court’s trial pool on July 14, 2003.

Deadlines for the exchange of trial exhibits and witness lists, motions in limine and other

pretrial submissions will be set by further Order of this Court. 

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT:

___________________________

R. Barclay Surrick, Judge

Case 2:02-cv-02784-RBS Document 12 Filed 02/28/2003 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

RAMONA ERAZO 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

TRANS UNION LLC 

ROBINSONS/MAY 

WELLS FARGO BANK 

Defendants 

C.A. NO: 02-CV-4438 

JOINT MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

Trans Union LLC (“Trans Union”), Wells Fargo Bank (“Wells”) and Ramona Erazo 

(“Plaintiff”) (collectively referred to as the “Parties”), by and through their undersigned attorneys, 

jointly move for an extension of time of all deadlines for sixty (60) days. 

1. Plaintiff has commenced this action alleging that Defendant Trans Union violated the 

Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. '1681 et seq. (the “FCRA”) because it reported certain 

allegedly inaccurate credit information relating to Plaintiff. Plaintiff asserts Wells violated the 

FCRA because it furnished allegedly inaccurate credit information to Trans Union after receipt of an 

alleged notice of dispute. 

2. The Parties have engaged in serious settlement discussions. Robinsons/May and 

Plaintiff have settled. 

3. The Parties have requested a settlement conference with Magistrate Judge Angell. 

No date for this conference has yet been set. The Parties do have some remaining discovery to 

complete, including depositions. 

4. Summary Judgment motions are due Thursday, March 27, 2003. This matter is 

scheduled to enter the trial pool on April 14, 2003. If the Parties are required to incur the time and 

Case 2:02-cv-04438-TJS Document 18 Filed 03/26/2003 Page 1 of 2
expense of motions, depositions and pretrial preparation, this would diminish the prospect of 

settlement. 

5. Accordingly, the Parties respectfully requests that the Scheduling Order be modified 

to extend all existing deadlines for sixty (60) days. 

WHEREFORE, the Parties jointly respectfully request that this Court grant an extension of 

time of all existing deadlines for sixty (60) days. 

Respectfully Submitted this 25th day of March , 2003 

 

___________________________________

MARK E. KOGAN 

BRUCE S. LUCKMAN 

TIMOTHY P. CREECH 

SATZBERG, TRICHON, 

 KOGAN & WERTHEIMER, P.C. 

1818 Market St., 30th Floor 

Philadelphia, PA 19103 

(215) 575-7600; Fax: (215) 575-7688 

Counsel for Defendant, 

Trans Union LLC 

By/S/TPC w/ express permission 

___________________________________

JOHN K. SEMLER, JR. 

BALLARD SPAHR, ANDREWS & 

INGERSOLL 

Plaza 1000, Suite 500, Main St. 

Voorhees, NJ 08043 

(856) 761-3402; Fax: (856) 873-9044 

By/S/TPC w/ express permission 

___________________________________

MARK D. MAILMAN 

FRANCIS & MAILMAN, P.C. 

Land Title Building, 19th Floor 

Philadelphia, PA 19110 

(215) 735-8600; Fax: (215) 940-8000 

Counsel for Plaintiff 

Case 2:02-cv-04438-TJS Document 18 Filed 03/26/2003 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JEREMY WILCZYNSKI : CIVIL ACTION

Plaintiff, :

 :

vs. :

 :

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, :

Commissioner of Social Security :

 Defendant. : NO. 02-4456

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 7th day of October, 2002, upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion to

Dismiss Count IV of Plaintiff’s Complaint (Document No. 5, filed September 23, 2002), there

being no objection to the granting of the Motion, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion to

Dismiss Count IV of Plaintiff’s Complaint is GRANTED.

BY THE COURT:

 

 JAN E. DUBOIS, J.

Case 2:02-cv-04456-JD Document 6 Filed 10/08/2002 Page 1 of 1
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-14-00240-CV

Henry Rahmani and Rahmani 

Management, LLC

v.

Dan Banet

§

§

§

§

From the 96th District Court

of Tarrant County (96-241990-09)

May 7, 2015

Opinion by Justice Charles Bleil

JUDGMENT ON REHEARING

After reviewing Appellant Henry Rahmani and Rahmani Management, 

LLC’s motion for rehearing, we deny the motion. We withdraw our March 26, 

2015 opinion and substitute the following. This court has again considered the 

record on appeal in this case and holds that there was error in the trial court’s 

judgment. It is ordered that the trial court’s judgment is modified to delete the 

$35,000 award against appellant Henry Rahmani, and we reverse the portion of 

the judgment awarding attorney’s fees to appellee Dan Banet and remand that

portion of the case for a new trial in light of our modification to the judgment. We 

affirm the remainder of the judgment as modified. 
It is further ordered that appellee shall bear the costs of this appeal, for 

which let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4; see also Tex. R. Civ. P. 

139.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By _/s/ Charles Bleil________________

 Justice Charles Bleil
No. 52524.

protests 104845-K, etc. (New York).

#### William H. Emig et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of platinum fox fur skins, undressedj similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *O. Brager-Larsen*(36 C. C. P. A. 1, C. A. D. 388). The claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was therefore sustained.
Reminders!!

The below listed

Reclassification/Reconciling 

options are only for

FULL CARS Reporters

• Reclassifications can be

entered any time of the

month, no reporting window

restriction.

• Reclassified transactions are

viewable in the Acct Stmt

Provisional View on the same

day.

• Limit of 99 supplemental

reports to our legacy

accounting system. NEED

MORE? We recommend you

net/summarize multiple

transactions on one

report/submission using

summary level or by uploading 

a bulk file.

Reconciliation 

Assistance? 

Treasury Support Center

1-877-440-9476

CRM CONTACTS

CRM MAILBOX:

gwa.crmd.users@fiscal.treasury.gov

IPAC- Dominique McCreary

Dominique.McCreary@fiscal.treasury

.gov (202)874-6352

TDO Payments- Luz Davila Lopez

Luz.Davila.Lopez@fiscal.treasury.gov 

(202)874-8599

NTDO Payments- Maria Davis

Maria.Davis@fiscal.treasury.gov

(202)874-8079

Collections- Katy Borys

Katy.Borys@fiscal.treasury.gov

(202)874-9005

Customer Relationship Management

TIP OF THE WEEK

Tips & Reminders for 

Reconciling as a CARS Reporter

Download Provisional transactions before the end of month, as only the 

Current Accounting Month provisional details will be available after the 30th/31st. 

Provisional details for the last day of the month won’t be available due to 

the rollover to the new month, but summary level will be available in official 

accounting posted view. You’ll see your IPAC transactions on the 2nd business 

day and your Collection (CIR) and Payment transactions 

(SPS/PAM/ASAP/ITS) on the 3rd business day.

Always view Account Statement Reports from the ALC perspective to see all 

the various TAS BETCs being reported for/against your ALC. 

Ensure your system default accounts are reconciled and reclassified timely: 

F3500 for payment and collection transactions, F3502 for intragovernmental 

transactions. 

Reclassifications & CTA Partial 224 (or 1219/1220, 1218/1221) reporting is due 

by 4th workday. 

Reclassification Options





online entry at summary level, using current CTA app

upload bulk file:

(http://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/files/cars/CTA-224-

bulkfile-09-26-11.pdf)

*New feature for FULL CARS REPORTERS*

 online entry at individual transaction level, using Account Statement

Transaction report reclassification function