alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Aggregate Statement of Principal and Interest Distributions to Certificateholders in 2001.



|Class              | Principal     | Interest      | Ending Principal Balance
|------------------ | ------------- | ------------- | ------------------------
|                   |               |               |                         
|                   |               |               |                         
|Residual Interests | 0.00          | 0.00          | 0.00                    
|R-I                | 0.00          | 0.00          | 0.00                    
|R-II               | 0.00          | 0.00          | 0.00                    
|A-1                | 21,379,027.88 | 22,065,258.35 | 331,377,972.12          
|A-2                | 0.00          | 28,644,000.00 | 440,000,000.00          
|B                  | 0.00          | 2,966,105.28  | 44,873,000.00           
|C                  | 0.00          | 3,033,414.84  | 44,873,000.00           
|D                  | 0.00          | 1,027,614.60  | 14,958,000.00           
|E                  | 0.00          | 545,219.16    | 7,479,000.00            
|F                  | 0.00          | 911,118.36    | 12,464,000.00           
|G                  | 0.00          | 777,816.00    | 9,972,000.00            
|H                  | 0.00          | 1,240,516.80  | 19,944,000.00           
|J                  | 0.00          | 620,258.40    | 9,972,000.00            
|K                  | 0.00          | 310,067.04    | 4,985,000.00            
|L                  | 0.00          | 465,193.80    | 7,479,000.00            
|M                  | 0.00          | 310,129.20    | 4,986,000.00            
|N                  | 0.00          | 310,129.20    | 4,986,000.00            
|P                  | 0.00          | 155,064.60    | 2,493,000.00            
|Q                  | 0.00          | 929,404.59    | 14,958,255.00           
|R-III              | 0.00          | 0.00          | 0.00                    
|S                  | 0.00          | 954,032.23    | 59,177,458.78           
|X                  | 0.00          | 16,170,380.97 | 975,800,227.12          
|Q                  | 0.00          | 0.00          | 0.00
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 6 I 0 0 11

. BROADRI CK L. SHROPSHI RE v . THE STATE.

Bro ad ri ck Sh ro p s hi re h as b een i n d i ct ed fo r m al ice m u rd er, fel o n y m

u rd er, an d

a nu m b er o f o t h er ch arg es

. Sh ro p s h i re fi l ed an ap p l i cat i on fo r i n t erl o cu t o ry ap p eal in

t h i s Co urt

, s eek in g rev i ew o f t h e t ri al co u rt 's o rd er g ran ti n g t h e St a t e ’ s m o t i o n to

d i s q u al i fy h i s d efen s e co u n sel

. In St a t e v. Th o r n t o n , 2 5 3 G a. 5 2 4 (1 ) (3 2 2 SE2 d 7 1 1 )

(1 9 8 4), t h e Su p r e m e Co u rt d i rect ed t h at we t ran s fer " al l cas es i n wh i ch ei t h er a

s en t en ce o f d eat h o r l ife i m p ri s on m en t h as b een i m

p o s ed u p o n co nv i ct io n of m u rd er,

an d al l p re-co nv i ct i o n ap peal s i n m u rd er cas es " t o t h at Co u rt

. Th i s in s t ru ct i o n was

u p h el d i n S t a t e v. Mu rr a

y , 2 8 6 Ga. 2 5 8

, 25 9 (1 ) (6 8 7 SE2 d 7 90 ) (2 00 9 ) (i f t h e m u rd er

co u nt o f t h e i nd i ct m en t rem ai n s p en d i n g b el o w, ju ri s di ct i o n o f t he ap p eal l i es i n t h e

S u p r e m e Co u rt ). Acco rd i n g l y , t h i s ap pl i cat i o n is hereb y TRANSFERRED t o t h e

Su p rem e Co u rt fo r d i s p o s i t i o n

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e

, A t la n t a

,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 09/09/2015 September 09, 2015
IC 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1617 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

AUGUST 4, 2017 

Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

AN ACT 

To designate the checkpoint of the United States Border 

Patrol located on United States Highway 77 North in 

Sarita, Texas, as the ‘‘Javier Vega, Jr. Border Patrol 

Checkpoint’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with BILLS

2 

S 1617 RFH 

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Javier Vega, Jr. Me3 morial Act of 2017’’. 

4 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

5 Congress finds the following: 

6 (1) A native of La Feria, Texas, Border Patrol 

7 Agent Javier Vega, Jr., served his country first a 

8 member of the United States Marines Corps and 

9 then proudly as a border patrol agent in the canine 

10 division with his dog, Goldie. 

11 (2) Agent Vega was assigned to the Kingsville, 

12 Texas, Border Patrol Station as a canine handler 

13 and worked primarily at the Sarita Border Patrol 

14 Checkpoint. 

15 (3) On August 3, 2014, Agent Vega was on a 

16 fishing trip with his family near Raymondville, 

17 Texas, when 2 criminal aliens attempted to rob and 

18 attack them. 

19 (4) Agent Vega was shot and killed while at20 tempting to subdue the assailants and protecting his 

21 family. 

22 (5) Agent Vega is survived by his wife, parents, 

23 3 sons, brother, sister-in-law, niece, and dog, Goldie. 

24 SEC. 3. DESIGNATION. 

25 The checkpoint of the United States Border Patrol 

26 located on United States Highway 77 North in Sarita, 

mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with BILLS

3 

S 1617 RFH 

1 Texas, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Javier Vega, 

2 Jr. Border Patrol Checkpoint’’. 

3 SEC. 4. REFERENCES. 

4 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

5 paper, or other record of the United States to the check6 point described in section 3 shall be deemed to be a ref7 erence to the ‘‘Javier Vega, Jr. Border Patrol Check8 point’’. 

Passed the Senate August 3, 2017. 

Attest: JULIE E. ADAMS, 

Secretary. 

mstockstill on DSK30JT082PROD with BILLS
### MA**TERIA LS NOT INCLUDED IN** 

**AI RWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE (A**  **D) DOCKET**

FAA- 2012 - 0087 Docket Number

2011 - SW - 029 - AD Directorate Identifier Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in DMS Docket and Maintained

in the Supplemental AD Docket Aviation Spec ialties Unlimited Inc., ASB No. ASU 206 - 2010 - 11 - 1, dated November 4, 2010
**MA Y BE VIEWED AT:**  Federal Aviation Administration

Office of the Regional Counsel, Southwest Region Rules Docket 2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663 Fort W orth, Texas 76137 **DURING THE HOURS OF:**  9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays.
# Data

&"Calibri,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2022-10	&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000DRAFT&K01+000 VII VSR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"&10IRC Handout 3/10/22
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1139 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1139

To amend the Financial Stability Act of 2010 to modify the requirements 
                            of stress tests.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 16, 2017

 Mr. Tester (for himself, Mr. Moran, and Ms. Heitkamp) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                  Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Financial Stability Act of 2010 to modify the requirements 
                            of stress tests.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Main Street Regulatory Fairness 
Act''.

SEC. 2. ENHANCED SUPERVISION AND PRUDENTIAL STANDARDS FOR NONBANK 
              FINANCIAL COMPANIES SUPERVISED BY THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS 
              AND CERTAIN BANK HOLDING COMPANIES.

    Section 165(i)(2)(A) of the Financial Stability Act of 2010 (12 
U.S.C. 5365(i)) is amended--
            (1) in the first sentence, by striking ``semiannual'' and 
        inserting ``periodic''; and
            (2) in the second sentence--
                    (A) by striking ``$10,000,000,000'' and inserting 
                ``$50,000,000,000''; and
                    (B) by striking ``annual'' and inserting 
                ``periodic''.
                                 <all>
```
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED July 13, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-60219 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus RODERICK STUTTS, Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:04-CR-78-1

-------------------- Before SMITH, GARZA and PRADO, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Roderick Stutts was convicted by a jury on four counts of possession with intent to distribute cocaine base, and he was sentenced to 121 months of imprisonment on each count to run concurrently and five years of supervised release. Stutts argues that the Government failed to authenticate or establish the chain of custody for the cocaine. Stutts contends that the prosecution introduced no evidence from Clarence Ward that the drugs introduced into evidence were in fact purchased from him. Ward testified that each time he purchased crack cocaine from Stutts,No. 05-60219 -2- he immediately turned over the drugs to a task force agent, and his testimony was corroborated by the agents. Stutts has not shown that the jury could not have decided that the evidence was what the Government claimed it to be. See United States v.
Casto , 889 F.2d 562, 568-69 (5th Cir. 1989) . Stutts has not demonstrated that the district court abused it discretion in admitting the drug exhibits. See United States v. Polasek , 162 F.3d 878, 883 (5th Cir. 1998). Stutts argues that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict because the only evidence of his guilt came from Ward, “a paid informant, whose testimony was so inherently unreliable, unreasonable and improbable that no reasonable juror should have credited it.” Stutts’ argument is based on the alleged lack of credibility of Ward. This court’s review for sufficiency of the evidence is not concerned with the credibility of witnesses or the weight of the evidence, which is the exclusive province of the jury. United States v. Garcia , 995 F.2d 556, 561 (5th Cir. 1993). As the Government points out, the jury was made aware of Ward’s prior convictions, the current charges pending against him, and the fact that he was a paid informant, all factors that bore on his credibility. The jury chose to believe Ward, and this court does not reweigh such a decision. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
No. 49597.

#### Petition 6343-R of Sears, Roebuck & Co. (Boston).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In view of the testimony at the hearings and the admission of Government counsel that an investigation by a customs agent affirmed the evidence introduced on behalf of petitioners, the court was satisfied that the entry was made without intent to defraud the Revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts. Petition was therefore granted.
Case: 16-13626 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 1 of 7Case: 16-13626 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 2 of 7Case: 16-13626 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 3 of 7Case: 16-13626 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 4 of 7Case: 16-13626 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 5 of 7Case: 16-13626 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 6 of 7Case: 16-13626 Date Filed: 07/13/2016 Page: 7 of 7
# C_2017256EN.01002201.xml

| 7.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 256/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 256/22

---

Judgment of the General Court of 21 June 2017 — M/S. Indeutsch International v EUIPO — Crafts Americana Group (Representation of chevrons between two parallel lines)

(Case T-20/16) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU figurative mark representing chevrons between two parallel lines - Distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Examination of the mark as registered))

(2017/C 256/23)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: M/S. Indeutsch International (Noida, India) (represented initially by D. Stone, D. Meale, A. Dykes, Solicitors, and S. Malynicz QC, subsequently by D. Stone and S. Malynicz and lastly by D. Stone, S. Malynicz and M. Siddiqui, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: Crafts Americana Group, Inc. (Vancouver, Washington, United States) (represented by: J. Fish and V. Leitch, Solicitors and A. Bryson, Barrister)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 5 November 2015 (Case R 1814/2014-1), relating to invalidity proceedings between Crafts Americana Group and M/S. Indeutsch International.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 5 November 2015 (Case R 1814/2014-1); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 5 November 2015 (Case R 1814/2014-1);

| 2. | Orders EUIPO to pay the costs of M/S. Indeutsch International; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders EUIPO to pay the costs of M/S. Indeutsch International;

| 3. | Orders Crafts Americana Group, Inc. to pay its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Crafts Americana Group, Inc. to pay its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 106, 21.3.2016.

1

---
Bulletin 2015-03 DRAFT IRC Handout December 02, 2014

No. USSGL Account Title Anticipated

Budg/P

rop

Norm 

Bal

Begin/E

nd

Debit/C

redit

Budgetary 

Impact

Indicator

Fed/NonFe

d Fund Type

Reporting 

Type Code

Financing 

Account

Code

TAS 

Status Trans. Code

Borrowing 

Authority

From the 

Treasury

Borrowing 

Authority

From the 

Public

Contract 

Authority

579500 Seigniorage N P C E D/C E N

CF/DF/EC/EG/

EM/EP/ER/ES/

ET/GA/TR/UG/

US/UT E/F/U D/G/N U/E X/K/N D/I/M/N D/I/M/N D/I/M/N

DRAFT

USSGL ACCOUNT USSGL ACCOUNT ATTRIBUTES

- USSGL ATTRIBUTES BULK FILE ATTRIBUTES TAS ATTRIBUTES

Attributes to Accounts Report

Part 1 Fiscal Year 2014 Reporting

SUPPLEMENT Section IV

U.S. Government Standard General Ledger
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Championship Auto Racing Teams, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending March 31, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Christopher R. Pook, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section G 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Christopher R. Pook

Christopher R. Pook
Chief Executive Officer
May 6, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Championship Auto Racing Teams, Inc. and will be retained by
Championship Auto Racing Teams, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# sec6_rbalsh_2021

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2021-07	&"Arial,Bold"&10DRAFT RBS - &P	&"Arial,Bold"&10&K000000IRC Handouts 12 03 20
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           1,628
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           5,353
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    116,108
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           9,459
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             9,008
<LOANS>                                        227,629
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,576
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 385,212
<DEPOSITS>                                     230,192
<SHORT-TERM>                                   102,825
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              6,415
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            69
<OTHER-SE>                                      45,711
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 385,212
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 12,997
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                9,893
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                22,890
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               7,566
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,816
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            8,074
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 438
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  6,405
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,009
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       4,009
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,595
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .49
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .49
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   7.664
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,449
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                  1,449
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,643
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       72
<RECOVERIES>                                         5
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,576
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,576
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
MEMORANDUM

TO: Docket EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0505, Oil and Natural Gas Sector Rules

FROM: Bruce Moore, USEPA

DATE: May 29, 2012

SUBJECT: Late Docket Entries

On April 17, 2012, the EPA’s Administrator signed the Oil and Natural Gas Sector: New Source 

Performance Standards (NSPS) and National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants 

(NESHAP) Reviews final rule. On that date, EPA staff had completed all materials comprising 

the administrative record for the NSPS and NESHAP. However, staff inadvertently failed to 

enter an item into the rulemaking docket. Upon noticing the omission, staff entered the item into 

the docket, albeit after the signature date.

The item in question is the version of the rule sent from the EPA’s Office of Policy to the Office 

of Management and Budget (OMB) for interagency review under E.O. 12866. All pertinent 

information used in rulemaking was contained in the technical support documents that were 

entered into the docket by April 17, 2012, including a redline/strikeout version of the rule that 

identified all changes made by OMB during its review. The late entry of this item in no way 

affected any of the decisions in promulgating the final rule. 

The docket numbers for this late entry and this memorandum are EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0505-

4655 and EPA-HQ-OAR-2010-0505-4656, respectively.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>  5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                             547
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,596
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,233
<INVENTORY>                                     25,220
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                41,952
<PP&E>                                          69,071
<DEPRECIATION>                                   9,682
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 222,674
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,592
<BONDS>                                        125,813
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      34,599
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   222,674
<SALES>                                         70,939
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                70,939
<CGS>                                           52,628
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   67,331
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,986
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   321
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              11,470
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (10,848)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (3,607)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (7,241)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (7,241)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 151 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 1 of 6
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 151 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 2 of 6
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 151 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 3 of 6
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 151 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 4 of 6
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 151 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 5 of 6
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 151 Filed 10/04/2006 Page 6 of 6