alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 1SUPPLEMENT &"ARIAL,Regular"	&"Arial,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2020 ReportingSection VII  

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2020-15	&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000DRAFT&K000000 VII VDR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout 4/23/20
(Reap. Dec. *10977)*

#### New York Merchandise Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 4126, etc.

(Decided May 13, 1965)

*iStein & Shostalc*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Nichols, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the schedule of cases, attached hereto and made a part hereof, are before me on the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED hy and between counsel for the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, as to the merchandise covered by the entries the subject of the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached Schedule of Cases which is incorporated herein that on the dates of exportation thereof to the United States, the market value or the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States was the invoice unit values plus the f.o.b. charges set out on the invoices, but not including the buying commission on said merchandise.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that as to any of the merchandise on the invoices covered by the entries the subject of the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached Schedule of Gases which is included in the list of articles designated by the Secretary of the Treasury in T.D. 54521 as provided for in Sec. 6(a) of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, Public Law 927, 84th Congress which is subject to appraisement under Sec. 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, that there were no higher foreign values for such or similar merchandise on the dates of exportation involved herein.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the footwear covered by the entries, the subject of the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached Schedule of Cases, is unlike any articles manufactured or produced in the United States.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appeals for re-appraisement enumerated in the attached Schedule of Cases may be deemed submitted for decision on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find and hold that export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) or 402a(d) of the Tariff Act of. 1930, as *656amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, 70 Stat. 943, is the proper basis for the determination of value of the merchandise involved herein and that said value is represented by the invoice unit values, plus the f.o.b. charges set out on the invoices, but not including the buying commission on said merchandise.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Exhibit 31.2



INDEPENDENCE LEAD MINES COMPANY

December 31, 2005



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Wayne L. Schoonmaker, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Independence Lead Mines Company.



2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;



4. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;



b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design  or operation of internal controls  over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and



b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.







Date: March 28, 2006



/s/ Wayne L. Schoonmaker

Principal Accounting Officer
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K (the
Report) of I.D. Systems, Inc. (the Corporation) for the year ended
December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof, I, Jeffrey M. Jagid, Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge, that:

(1)          The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)          The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.

|                         |                                           
|------------------------ | ------------------------------------------
|Dated: February 22, 2006 | /s/ Jeffrey M. Jagid                      
|                         |                                           
|                         | Jeffrey M. Jagid
  Chief Executive Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not
being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise
adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the
Corporation and will be retained by the Corporation and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

TOLEDO MACK SALES & :

SERVICE, INC., : CIVIL ACTION

:

Plaintiff, : NO. 02-4373

:

v. :

:

MACK TRUCKS, INC., :

:

Defendant. :

______________________________________________________________________________

MACK TRUCKS, INC., :

:

Counterclaim Plaintiff, :

:

v. :

:

TOLEDO MACK SALES & :

SERVICE, INC., :

:

Counterclaim Defendant. :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 12 day of September, 2006, upon consideration of th

Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff Mack Trucks, Inc.’s Motion in Limine to exclude evidence of

the sales of truck parts (Docket No. 91), and all responses filed thereto, and after oral argument

having been held, it is hereby ORDERED that said Motion is DENIED WITHOUT

PREJUDICE. 

BY THE COURT:

 s/ Ronald L. Buckwalter, S. J. 

RONALD L. BUCKWALTER, S.J.

Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 115 Filed 09/13/2006 Page 1 of 1
**SP-4223 "Before This Decade IsOut..."**
** **

**- CONTENTS -**

 

 

Foreword.

Acknowledgments.

Introduction.

Chapter 1. James E. Webb.

Chapter 2. Thomas O. Paine.

Chapter 3. Wernher von Braun.

Chapter 4. Robert R. Gilruth.

Chapter 5. George E. Mueller.

Chapter 6. Eugene F. Kranz.

Chapter 7. Arthur J. Rogers, Jr.

Chapter 8. James H. "Harry" Guin.

Chapter 9. Glynn S. Lunney.

Chapter 10. Geneva B. Barnes.

Chapter 11. Charles M. Duke, Jr.

Chapter 12. Harrison H. Schmitt.

Chapter 13. George M. Low.

Chapter 14. Maxime A. Faget.

Annotated Project ApolloBibliography.

About theEditor.

The NASA HistorySeries.

Index.
No. 57230.

Suit 4722.

#### Uddo & Taormina Co. *v.*United States.

Reap. Dec. 8061 affirmed December 17, 1952. C. A. D. 505.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1395 Referred in House (RFH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1395

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 25, 2018

             Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To revise the boundaries of certain John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier 
                  Resources System units in Delaware.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPLACEMENT OF JOHN H. CHAFEE COASTAL BARRIER RESOURCES 
              SYSTEM MAP.

    (a) In General.--The map subtitled ``Delaware Seashore Unit DE-07P, 
North Bethany Beach Unit H01'' and dated December 6, 2013, that is 
included in the set of maps entitled ``Coastal Barrier Resources 
System'' referred to in section 4(a) of the Coastal Barrier Resources 
Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(a)) and relating to certain John H. Chafee Coastal 
Barrier Resources System units in the State of Delaware, is replaced by 
the map entitled ``Delaware Seashore Unit DE-07/DE-07P, North Bethany 
Beach Unit H01'' and dated March 18, 2016.
    (b) Availability.--The Secretary of the Interior shall keep the 
replacement map referred to in subsection (a) on file and available for 
inspection in accordance with section 4(b) of the Coastal Barrier 
Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(b)).

            Passed the Senate January 23, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                JULIE E. ADAMS,

                                                             Secretary.
```
No. 57974.

protest 72014-K (New York).

#### Al Fuchs Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the kidskin plates are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Kung Chen Fur Corpn.*v. *United Stales*(29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained as to entry 75082. The protest having been abandoned as to entry 74476, same was dismissed as to said entry.

Ford, J., concurred.

Mollison, J., dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1480, *supra,*insofar as entry 75082 was concerned.
# C_2017168EN.01001702.xml

| 29.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 168/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 168/17

---

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 9 March 2017 — Simet SpA v European Commission

(Case C-232/16 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - State aid - Transport sector - Inter-regional bus transport services - Regulation (EEC) No 1191/69 - Right to compensation for expenses arising from the performance of public service obligations - National judicial decision - Aid incompatible with the internal market))

(2017/C 168/22)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Simet SpA (represented by: A. Clarizia, C. Varrone and P. Clarizia, avvocati)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: G. Conte, D. Grespan and P.J. Loewenthal, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Simet SpA shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Simet SpA shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 232, 27.6.2016.

1

---
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 2SUPPLEMENT &"Arial,Regular"	&"Arial,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2021 ReportingSection VII &"Arial,Regular" 

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2020-15	&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000DRAFT&K000000 VII ESR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout 4/23/20
##### 



Exhibit 32.0

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002


The certification set forth below is being
submitted in connection with the Quarterly Report of CSK Auto
Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ending
August 1, 2004 (the Report) for the purpose of
complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act)
and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the
United States Code.

Maynard L. Jenkins, the Chief Executive Officer
and Don W. Watson, the Chief Financial Officer of CSK Auto
Corporation, each certifies that to the best of their knowledge:



| |                                                                                                                                                                         
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) The Report fully complies with the
    requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
    Exchange Act of 1934; and                                       
|
| | (2) The information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and result of operations of CSK Auto Corporation.



| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/ MAYNARD L. JENKINS 
| |                        
| | Maynard L. Jenkins     
| | Chief Executive Officer

September 9, 2004



| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/ DON W. WATSON      
| |                        
| | Don W. Watson          
| | Chief Financial Officer

September 9, 2004
Case 2:02-cv-20135-HB Document 29 Filed 04/16/2008 Page 1 of 6
Case 2:02-cv-20135-HB Document 29 Filed 04/16/2008 Page 2 of 6
Case 2:02-cv-20135-HB Document 29 Filed 04/16/2008 Page 3 of 6
Case 2:02-cv-20135-HB Document 29 Filed 04/16/2008 Page 4 of 6
Case 2:02-cv-20135-HB Document 29 Filed 04/16/2008 Page 5 of 6
Case 2:02-cv-20135-HB Document 29 Filed 04/16/2008 Page 6 of 6
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 1SUPPLEMENT&"ARIAL,Regular"	&"Arial,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2022 ReportingSection VII&"ARIAL,Regular"

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2022-12	&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000DRAFT&K000000 VII CER - &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout 4/20/22
1

 Parties include all persons, corporations or other business entities, and insurance companies with

an interest in the case, and each entity with an interest in the case must attend the conference. In the case of

corporate or other business entities, the corporate official with ultimate settlement authority is required to attend. 

Where an insurance company is involved, a representative with ultimate settlement authority is also required to

attend. 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Sungard Financial Systems, Inc. : CIVIL ACTION

:

:

v. :

:

J.B. Oxford and Company : NO. 02-CV-4332

:

:

CONFERENCE ORDER

A Settlement Conference in the above-captioned case will be held on Tuesday,

September 23, 2003 at 10:30 a.m. before the Honorable James R. Melinson, Chief United States

Magistrate Judge, in Room 3000, U.S. Courthouse, 601 Market Street, Philadelphia, Pa. 19106.

The court assumes that settlement of this case is a real possibility. Counsel are

directed to notify the court if this assumption is unwarranted.

Counsel are directed to arrange to have clients with ultimate authority to

settle physically PRESENT in the courtroom for the duration of this conference.

1

 Parties

are to remain present until expressly released by the court.

Counsel are further directed to complete the enclosed Settlement Conference

Summary to be delivered to Chambers on or before Friday, September 19, 2003.

 

Hon. James R. Melinson

Chief United States Magistrate Judge

Nancy DeLisle, Deputy Clerk 

215-597-5316

Date: September 17, 2003

cc: James T. Smith, Esq. Michael E. Adler, Esq. Rebecca D. Ward, Esq.

 C. Philip Campbell, Jr. Mark S. Stewart, Esq. Tammy Giroux, Esq.

Case 2:02-cv-04332-RK Document 20 Filed 09/18/2003 Page 1 of 2
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE SUMMARY

CAPTION: 

DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: JURY / NONJURY

 (Circle One)

 TRIAL/POOL DATE: 

COUNSEL ATTENDING SETTLEM ENT CONFERENCE: 

Name: 

Address: 

Phone: 

 

Client: 

CLIENT ATTENDING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE:

 

 Name of Individual with Ultimate Settlement Authority who will be present at the settlement 

conference (include company and position where applicable):

 

MOTIONS PENDING:

 

 

 

OTHER RELEVANT M ATTERS: 

 

 

 

PRIOR OFFERS / DEMANDS: 

 

 

ATTACH SYNOPSIS OF CASE (LIMITED TO ONE PAGE)

Case 2:02-cv-04332-RK Document 20 Filed 09/18/2003 Page 2 of 2
No. 52491.

protests 56040-K, etc. (New York).

#### Arthur H. Lee & Sons, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance, with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries involved. The protests were sustained to this extent.
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 72-2 Filed 08/28/2009 Page 1 of 9
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 72-2 Filed 08/28/2009 Page 2 of 9
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 72-2 Filed 08/28/2009 Page 3 of 9
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 72-2 Filed 08/28/2009 Page 4 of 9
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 72-2 Filed 08/28/2009 Page 5 of 9
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 72-2 Filed 08/28/2009 Page 6 of 9
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 72-2 Filed 08/28/2009 Page 7 of 9
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 72-2 Filed 08/28/2009 Page 8 of 9
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 72-2 Filed 08/28/2009 Page 9 of 9
EXHIBIT 32.2

                 STATEMENT OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER FURNISHED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     The undersigned, Gary F. Hoskins, is the Chief Financial Officer of
Citizens South Banking Corporation (the "Company").

     This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the
Company of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2005 (the "Report").

     By execution of this statement, I certify that to the best of my knowledge:

          A)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a)
               or 78o(d)) and

          B)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
               covered by the Report.


August 9,  2005                               /s/ Gary F. Hoskins
                                              -----------------------
Dated                                         Gary F. Hoskins
                                              Chief Financial Officer

     This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so
that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that this
statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Citizens South Banking Corporation and will be retained by
Citizens South Banking Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

                                       23
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 1SUPPLEMENT	&"Arial,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2023 ReportingSection VII

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2023-08	&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000DRAFT&K000000 VII ESR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout 4/20/23
No. 59478.

protest 207616-K/14173 (New Orleans).

#### Glazer Steel Corp. *v.*United States,

*314Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of steel strips similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 58580, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
DRAFT

ID

Simple or

Special Name Type Description Error Message 

108 SPECIAL

Reimbursable Flag Restriction for DEFC Values Compound

Reimbursable Flag must be "D" (Direct) for any DEFC values other than "Q" or "QQQ".

Reimbursable Flag must be "D" (Direct

values other than "Q" or "QQQ". 

120 SPECIAL

USSGL Account 422100 on Financing 

Accountswith Beginning Credit Balance Compound

Reporting USSGL account 422100 with Financing Account 

Code "D" or "G"a beginning credit balance is restricted to 

specific cases.

Reporting USSGL account 422100 with 

balance is restricted to specific cases. 

125 SIMPLE

Bureau Code and TAS Combination Rule Programmatic The Bureau Code must be valid for the reporting TAS The Bureau Code must be valid for the 

126 SPECIAL

Main Account 3613 USSGL Restrictions Compound

TAS with Main Account 3613 are only permitted to report specific USSGL accounts.

TAS with Main Account 3613 are only p

specific USSGL accounts. 

127 SPECIAL

Main Account 3614 USSGL Restrictions Compound

TAS with Main Account 3614 are only permitted to report specific USSGL accounts.

TAS with Main Account 3614 are only p

specific USSGL accounts. 

U.S. Standard General Ledger

Data Validations - Summary

Part 1SUPPLEMENT

Bulletin No. 2022-12 DRAFT VII VSR - 1
**FY 2023 Scenario Updates**

Page 2 of 2                                        IRC Handout 08/23/2023