2009 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit 3-25-2009 

# In Re: I Re: K

evin W o o dr u ff P r e c e de n t i al or N on-P r e c e de n t i al : N on-P r e c e de n t i al D ocke t N o . 09-1064

F o l low thi s a nd a dd it ion al work s at : http://d i git alc ommon s .l a w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2009

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou gh t t o you for f r e e a nd ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit at V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Re posit or y

. It h as be e n a c c e pt e d for inclusion in 2009 D e c i sion s b y a n author i z e d a dmini s tr at or of V i l l a no va U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Re posit or y

. F or mor e inform at ion, p le as e c on t a ct Be n j amin . C a rl s on@l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du . Re c omme nde d C it at ion " In Re: I Re: Kevin W

oodr u ff " (2009). 2009 D e cisio n s . P ape r 1691. http://d i git alc ommon s .l a

w . vi l l a no va . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2009/1691W o o d ru f f h a s s in c e b e e n re lo c a ted o n m u lti p le o c c a sio n s, a n d c u rre n tlyis 1 i n c a r c e r a t e d a tU S P - B i g S a n d y i n K e n tu c k y. 1 H L D -39 (Ja n u a ry 3 0 , 2 0 0 9 ) NOT P RE CE DE NT I AL UN I TED STATES CO UR T OF A PP EALS F O R T H E T H IR D C IR C U IT

___________ N o. 09- 1064

___________ I N RE : K EV I N PA U L W O O D RU FF, Pet i t i oner

____________________________________ O n a Pet i t i on forW r i tof M andamus fr om t he U n ited S tate s D istric t C o u rt f o r th e M id d le D istric t o f P e n n sy lv a n ia ( R el at ed t o D . C . C i vi l N o. 3: 06- cv- 02310)

____________________________________ S u b m itte d P u rs u a n t to R u le 2 1 , F e d . R . A p p . P .

J anuary30, 2009 B efor e: SC I R I C A , C hi ef J udge, W E I S and G A R T H , C i r cui tJ udges (O p inion fil ed M arc h 2 5 , 2 0 0 9 )

______________ OP I NI ON

______________ P E R C U R I A M.

I n D ece m ber2006, Pet i t i onerK evi n W oodruff, a fe der al pr i s onerw ho, at t he t i m e, w as i ncar cer at ed atU SP-Lew i s bur g i n Penns y l vani a, pet i t i oned the D i s t r i ct 1 C our tfora w r i tof habe as corpus pur s uantt o 28 U . S. C . § 2241. I n J anuary2009,W oodruff’ s pet i t i on al s o s eeks ei t hera dec l ar at or yj udgm entor 2 p r e l i mi n a r yi n

j u n c t i o n p r o h i b i t i n g t h e e n f o r c e me n to f

1 8 U. S . C. § 4 0 8 1 , wh i c h h e c l a i ms w a s e n a c te d b yle s s th a n a q u o ru m o f C o n g re s s a n d is th e re f

o re u n c o n s titu tio n a l. W oodruff ha s notes t abl i s hed thatt hi s cl ai m w arr ant s m andamus r el i ef. See H ahnemann U niv. H osp. v. E dg ar, 74 F . 3d 45 6, 46 1 (3d C i r. 19 96 ) ( “T he w ri tof m and am us i s a drast i c rem edyt hat a courtshou l d g ranton l yi n ex t raor dinar yci rcum st ances i n respon se t o an ac tamount i ng t o a j udi ci al us urpat i on of pow er . ” ( ci t at i ons and i nt ernal quot at i on m ark s o m itted)). 2 W oodruff pe t i t i oned t hi s C our tfora w r i tof m andamus, r eques t i ng an or dercompel l i ng ei t hert he R es pondentt o ans w erW oodruff’ s J une 2008 mot i on t o s uppl ement hi s habea s pet i t i on ort he D i s t r i ctC our tt o actupon hi s habea s pet i t i on. O n M ar ch 12, 2009, t he 2 D i s t r i ctC our tdeni ed W oodruff’ s habea s pet i t i on. G i ven thatW oodruff ha s now r ece i ved o n e o f th e a ltern a tiv e f

o rm s o f re lief h e se e k s in h is m a n d a m u s p e tit io n – a ru lin g o n h is h a b e a s p e tit io n – w e w ill d e n yh is m a n d a m u s p e tit io n a s m o o t.