alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 220 (Thursday, November 16, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 78741]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-25343]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP24-150-000.
    Applicants: Eastern Shore Natural Gas Company.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Supply Connection Service Rate 
Schedule Filing to be effective 1/1/2024.
    Filed Date: 11/9/23.
    Accession Number: 20231109-5066.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/21/23.
    Any person desiring to intervene, to protest, or to answer a 
complaint in any of the above proceedings must file in accordance with 
Rules 211, 214, or 206 of the Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211, 
385.214, or 385.206) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the 
specified comment date. Protests may be considered, but intervention is 
necessary to become a party to the proceeding.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system 
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying 
the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    The Commission's Office of Public Participation (OPP) supports 
meaningful public engagement and participation in Commission 
proceedings. OPP can help members of the public, including landowners, 
environmental justice communities, Tribal members and others, access 
publicly available information and navigate Commission processes. For 
public inquiries and assistance with making filings such as 
interventions, comments, or requests for rehearing, the public is 
encouraged to contact OPP at (202) 502-6595 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#501f000010363522337e373f26"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d699868696b0b3a4b5f8b1b9a0">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: November 9, 2023.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-25343 Filed 11-15-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**Exhibit 32.2**

** **

**Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of**

**Title 18 Of The United States Code**

 

I, Steven J. Martin, the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of The ServiceMaster Company, certify that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of The ServiceMaster Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ Steven J. Martin |
|--------|----------------------|
|   | Steven J. Martin     |
|   | May 15, 2009    |

 

1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

________________________________

:

STEVEN B. GOLDBERG, : CIVIL ACTION

:

 Petitioner, :

:

v. : NO. 05-1005

:

DONALD L. KELCHNER, :

SUPERINTENDENT, et al., :

:

 Respondents. :

ORDER

AND NOW, this day of , 2005,

upon careful and independent consideration of the Petition for

Writ of Habeas Corpus, the Response thereto, and after review of

the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) of United States Magistrate

Judge Arnold C. Rapoport dated October 26, 2005, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that:

1. the R&R is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

2. the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED

with prejudice and DISMISSED without an evidentiary hearing; and

3. there is no probable cause to issue a

certificate of appealability. 

BY THE COURT:

_________________________________

EDMUND V. LUDWIG, S.J.

Case 2:05-cv-01005-EL Document 9 Filed 11/23/05 Page 1 of 1
# sec5_sbr_2021

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2021-17	&"Arial,Bold"&10V SBR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"&10IRC Handout April 21, 2021
# sec5_sbr_2021

&"aeriel,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2021-20	&"aeriel,Bold"&10V SBR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"&10IRC Handout August 18, 2021
# C_2018005EN.01003401.xml

| 8.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 5/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 5/34

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 November 2017 — Acquafarm v Commission

(Case T-458/16) (1)

1

((Non-contractual liability - Fisheries - Operational programme financed by the European Union - EU rules prohibiting imports of crustaceans from Australia - Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law conferring rights on individuals - Omission to act - Legitimate expectations))

(2018/C 005/45)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Acquafarm, SL (Huelva, Spain) (represented by: A. Pérez Moreno, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Arenas, I. Galindo Martín and F. Moro, Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action under Article 268 TFEU claiming compensation for the injury allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of the impossibility of completing an aquaculture project involving crustaceans from Australia and co-financed on the basis of Council Regulation (EC) No 1198/2006 of 27 July 2006 on the European Fisheries Fund (OJ 2006 L 223, p. 1) by reason of the ban on importing those crustaceans in accordance with the provisions of Commission Regulation (EC) No 1251/2008 of 12 December 2008 implementing Council Directive 2006/88/EC as regards conditions and certification requirements for the placing on the market and the import into the Community of aquaculture animals and products thereof and laying down a list of vector species (OJ 2008 L 337, p. 41).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Acquafarm, SL to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Acquafarm, SL to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 419, 14.11.2016.

1

---
Before the Third Division,

October 9, 1946

No. 51345.

#### Protests 965759-G, etc., of B. R. Anderson & Co. et al. (Seattle).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy Resolution 

The following resolution was passed unanimously by the members of the U.S. 

Commission on Ocean Policy at their meeting in Washington, D.C., on 

November 14, 2001. 

United Nations Law of the Sea Convention 

The National Commission on Ocean Policy unanimously 

recommends that the United States of America immediately 

accede to the United Nations Law of the Sea convention. 

Time is of the essence if the United States is to maintain its 

leadership role in ocean and coastal activities. Critical 

national interests are at stake and the United States can 

only be a full participant in upcoming Convention activities if 

the country proceeds with accession expeditiously.
No. 49123.

#### Protest 105832-K of Jimmie Marcus Import Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

It was stipulated that certain of the merchandise in question consists of wool hat bodies the same in all material respects as those passed upon in *Cohn*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 166, C. D. 314), the record in which case was incorporated herein. In accordance therewith the items in-question were held dutiable as claimed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

 

IN RE: DIET DRUGS (Phentermine/ :

Fenfluramine/Dexfenfluramine) : MDL DOCKET NO. 1203

PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION :

:

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: :

-----------------------------------:

MARTINEZ, et al. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-20135

v. :

WYETH, et al. : 

:

:

MELDER, et al. :

v. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-20135

WYETH, et al. :

:

PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 

AND NOW, this day of August, 2004, it is hereby

ORDERED that:

(1) Report and Recommendation No. 13 of Special

Discovery Master (as to Wyeth's Motion to Strike in the Martinez

and Melder Matters) is hereby AFFIRMED; 

(2) Wyeth's motion to strike in the Martinez and Melder

Matters (Doc. No. 204553) is DENIED; 

(3) Plaintiffs' counsel will be sanctioned for failure

to comply with Rule 16(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

in an amount to be determined by the court after reviewing the

submission by Wyeth of an affidavit detailing the hourly billing

rates and time spent in an attempt to obtain Rule 26 compliant

expert reports for these plaintiffs, including time spent

Case 2:02-cv-20142-HB Document 11 Filed 08/27/2004 Page 1 of 2
-2-

preparing the motion to strike plaintiffs Marilyn Melder's and

Peggy Martinez's Expert Witnesses; 

(4) Wyeth shall submit an affidavit detailing the

hourly billing rates and time spent in an attempt to obtain Rule

26 compliant expert reports for these plaintiffs, including time

spent preparing the motion to strike plaintiffs Marilyn Melder's

and Peggy Martinez's Expert Witnesses; and

(5) Plaintiff Martinez shall supplement her expert

report in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26

within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order.

BY THE COURT:

______________________________

J.

Case 2:02-cv-20142-HB Document 11 Filed 08/27/2004 Page 2 of 2
Appendix C 

Rhodia

PM10 NOx 

Maximum 24-hr actual Emission Rate g/s g/s 

Unit 1 0.05 6.20 

Unit 2 0.09 13.38
Case 2:02-cv-04417-AB Document 28 Filed 07/15/2003 Page 1 of 15
Case 2:02-cv-04417-AB Document 28 Filed 07/15/2003 Page 2 of 15
Case 2:02-cv-04417-AB Document 28 Filed 07/15/2003 Page 3 of 15
Case 2:02-cv-04417-AB Document 28 Filed 07/15/2003 Page 4 of 15
Case 2:02-cv-04417-AB Document 28 Filed 07/15/2003 Page 5 of 15
Case 2:02-cv-04417-AB Document 28 Filed 07/15/2003 Page 6 of 15
Case 2:02-cv-04417-AB Document 28 Filed 07/15/2003 Page 7 of 15
Case 2:02-cv-04417-AB Document 28 Filed 07/15/2003 Page 8 of 15
Case 2:02-cv-04417-AB Document 28 Filed 07/15/2003 Page 9 of 15
Case 2:02-cv-04417-AB Document 28 Filed 07/15/2003 Page 10 of 15
Case 2:02-cv-04417-AB Document 28 Filed 07/15/2003 Page 11 of 15
Case 2:02-cv-04417-AB Document 28 Filed 07/15/2003 Page 12 of 15
Case 2:02-cv-04417-AB Document 28 Filed 07/15/2003 Page 13 of 15
Case 2:02-cv-04417-AB Document 28 Filed 07/15/2003 Page 14 of 15
Case 2:02-cv-04417-AB Document 28 Filed 07/15/2003 Page 15 of 15
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

LAMONT GIST : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. :

:

DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, et al. : NO. 05-4250

 ORDER

AND NOW this 25th day of August, 2009, upon careful and

independent consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas

Corpus of petitioner Lamont Gist (Docket No. 1) and the responses

and replies thereto, and after review of the Report and

Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Linda K.

Caracappa (Docket No. 41) and the objections and response

thereto, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, for the reasons set out in a

memorandum of today’s date, that:

1. The petitioner’s Objections are OVERRULED.

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED

and DISMISSED WITHOUT AN EVIDENTIARY HEARING.

3. There is no basis for the issuance of a

certificate of appealability.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Mary A. McLaughlin

MARY A. McLAUGHLIN, J.

Case 2:05-cv-04250-MAM Document 55 Filed 08/25/09 Page 1 of 1
Before the First Division,

September 13, 1951

No. 55876.

protests 116072-K, etc. (Los Angeles).

#### Quon Quon Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of pikake shells the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 55389, the claim for free entry under paragraph 1738 was sustained.
No. 55833.

protest 171210-K. (New York).

#### Norda Essential Oil & Chemical Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of the essential and distilled oil of amyris balsamifera similar in all material respects to that the subject of Abstract 54349, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6455

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

JAMES STATON, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District

Judge. (CR-96-15, CA-97-3745-17)

Submitted: July 22, 1998 Decided: August 7, 1998

Before ERVIN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Staton, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Marshall Prince, OFFICE OF

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

James Staton, Jr., seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning

of the district court. United States v. Staton, Nos. CR-96-15; CA97-3745-17 (D.S.C. Mar. 17, 1998). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
N OTE : This disposition is nonprecedential. 

# United States **Court of Appeals**  **for the Federal Circuit**

______________________ ACI TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Plaintiff

- Appellant

v.
UNITED STATES, PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, Defendants

- Appellees

______________________
2022

- 1966

______________________ Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:21

- cv

- 02340

- ZNS, Judge Zachary N. Somers.

______________________
JUDGMENT

______________________
J ONATHAN D AVID S HAFFER , Haynes and Boone, LLP, Tysons Corner, VA, argued for plaintiff

- appellant. Also represented by T ODD M ATTHEW G ARLAND , Smith, Pachter, McWhorter, PLC . Tysons Corner, VA

.
S TEVEN M ICHAEL M AGER , Commerc ial LitigationBranch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for defendant

- appellee United States

. A lso represented by B RIAN M. B OYNTON , E RIC P. B RUSKIN , P ATRICIA M. M C C ARTHY

. Case: 22-1966 Document: 65 Page: 1 Filed: 09/08/2023R OBERT C HARLES R UTHERFORD , J R

. , The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA, for defendant -appellee The Pennsylvania State University

.

______________________
T HIS C AUSE ha ving been heard and considered, it is

O R DERED and A DJUDGED :

P ER C URIAM (M OORE , Chief Judge
, R EYNA and T ARANTO , Circuit Judges ).
AFFIRMED. See Fed . Cir. R. 36.

E NTERED BY O RDER OF THE C OURT

September 8, 2023 Date /s/ Jarrett B. Perlow Jarrett B. Perlow Clerk of Court Case: 22-1966 Document: 65 Page: 2 Filed: 09/08/2023
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

TOLEDO MACK SALES & :

SERVICE, INC., : CIVIL ACTION

:

Plaintiff, : NO. 02-4373

:

v. :

:

MACK TRUCKS, INC., :

:

Defendant. :

______________________________________________________________________________

MACK TRUCKS, INC., :

:

Counterclaim Plaintiff, :

:

v. :

:

TOLEDO MACK SALES & :

SERVICE, INC., :

:

Counterclaim Defendant. :

ORDER

There are three motions before the court; namely, 

(1) Plaintiff’s Motion to Stay Execution of Judgment (Docket No. 176); 

(2) Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration (Docket No. 183); and 

(3) Defendant’s Motion for Leave to Register the Judgment of this Court in the 

Northern District of Ohio (Docket No. 186).

 In light of the court’s opinion of this date, all of those motions are DENIED without

prejudice to refile as appropriate in light of the opinion aforesaid.

Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 189 Filed 02/16/2007 Page 1 of 2
It is SO ORDERED this 16 day of February, 2007. th

BY THE COURT:

 s/ Ronald L. Buckwalter, S. J. 

 RONALD L. BUCKWALTER, S. J. 

Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 189 Filed 02/16/2007 Page 2 of 2
Midland Loan Services

March 12, 2002

 

Attn: Corporate Trust Department	Via UPS

Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, N.A.	(410) 884-2000

11000 Broken Land Parkway

Columbia, MD

USA	21044-3562

 

Salomon Brothers Mortgage Securities VII, Inc., Commercial Mortgage Pass

Through Certificates, Series 2000-C3

Pooling and Servicing Agreement

OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

 

Pursuant to the requirements of that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement governing the referenced Trust (the "PSA"), it is hereby certified that (i) the undersigned has completed a review of the servicer's performance of its obligations under the PSA for the preceding calendar year; (ii)to the best of the undersigned's knowledge. on the basis of that review the servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the PSA throughout such period in all material respects; (iii) to the best of the undersigned's knowledge, the subservicer, of the servicer under the PSA, if any, has fulfilled its obligations under its sub-servicing agreement in all material respects; and, (iv) no notice has been received from any governmental agency or body-which would indicate a challenge or question as to the status of the Trust's qualification as a REMIC under the U.S. Code.

 

 

			*Charles J. Sipple                       3/16/02
			Charles .Sip	Date
			Executive Vice President

cc:

		Ms. Cynthia Reis

		LaSalle Bank National Association

		ABS Trust Services Group

		135 South LaSalle Street, Suite 1625

		Chicago, IL 60603
	

  A PNC Real Estate Finance Company

	210 West 10th Street Kansas City Miissouri 64105

www..midlandls.com      816-435-5000     816-435-2326*
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date of Notice:

KEVIN MITCHELL : July 23, 2003

 vs. :

TRANS UNION, LLC, ET AL. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-4439

TAKE NOTICE that the above-captioned matter is

scheduled for TRIAL in the United States District Court,

United States Courthouse, 601 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA,

before the Honorable John P. Fullam, on October 27, 2003, at

10:00 A.M., in Courtroom No. 15-A.

If trial counsel is on trial or otherwise engaged at

the time of the scheduled trial, another attorney in such trial

counsel's office should appear.

THE MATTER WILL BE CONTINUED TO ANOTHER DATE ONLY IN

EXCEPTIONAL CASES.

Very truly yours,

Rosalind Burton-Hoop

Deputy Clerk to Judge Fullam

COPIES BY MAIL ON 7/23/03 TO: Mark D. Mailman, Esquire

 Richard A. Kraemer, Esquire

 Timothy P. Creech, Esquire

 Jeffrey P. Bates, Esquire

 John C. Farrell, Esquire

 John Keim Semler, Esquire

 Jonathan D. Weiss, Esquire

Case 2:02-cv-04439-JF Document 21 Filed 07/23/2003 Page 1 of 1
Amendment No. 1 to the Employment Agreement of Michael Porche



 Exhibit 10.22 
  

			
		  	 AMENDMENT NO. 1, dated as of November 1, 2007, to that Employment Agreement dated December 18, 2003 (the “Agreement”) by
and between Michael Porche (the “Executive”) and Distribution Services, Inc. (the “Company”).


 Effective as of the date first written above, the Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

 1. Paragraph 1a of the Agreement, as amended, is hereby deleted and the following substituted therefore: 
 Employment Term. The Company shall employ Executive until December 31, 2009 (the “Employment Term”) on the terms and subject to the
conditions set forth in this Agreement. The Agreement shall be considered effective as of December 22, 2003 (the “Effective Time”). 
 All other terms and conditions of Executive’s Employment Agreement and any subsequent amendments of that Employment Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. 
 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Amendment No. 1 as of the date first written above. 
  

					
	Distribution Services, Inc.
			
	By:	 	 /s/ Daniel Rotstein
	 	11/3/07
		 	Daniel Rotstein	 	Date
			
		 	 /s/ Michael Porche
	 	11/2/07
		 	Michael Porche	 	Date
Form 943-A

(Rev. December 2020)

Agricultural Employer’s Record of 

Federal Tax Liability

Department of the Treasury 

Internal Revenue Service 

▶ Go to www.irs.gov/Form943A for instructions and the latest information.

▶ File with Form 943 or Form 943-X.

OMB No. 1545-0035 

Calendar Year 

Name (as shown on Form 943) Employer identification number (EIN) 

You must complete this form if you’re a semiweekly schedule depositor or became one because your accumulated tax liability during 

any month was $100,000 or more. Show tax liability here, not deposits. (The IRS gets deposit data from electronic funds transfers.) 

Don’t change your current year tax liability by adjustments reported on any Forms 943-X. 

January Tax Liability

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

A Total liability for month ▶

February Tax Liability

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

B Total liability for month ▶

March Tax Liability

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

C Total liability for month ▶

April Tax Liability

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

D Total liability for month ▶

May Tax Liability

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

E Total liability for month ▶

June Tax Liability

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

F Total liability for month ▶

For Privacy Act and Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see the separate instructions. Cat. No. 17030C Form 943-A (Rev. 12-2020) 
Form 943-A (Rev. 12-2020) Page 2 

July Tax Liability

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

G Total liability for month ▶

August Tax Liability

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

H Total liability for month ▶

September Tax Liability

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

I Total liability for month ▶

October Tax Liability

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

J Total liability for month ▶

November Tax Liability

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

K Total liability for month ▶

December Tax Liability

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

L Total liability for month ▶

M Total tax liability for year (add lines A through L). This must equal line 13 on Form 943 . . . ▶

Form 943-A (Rev. 12-2020)