alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.02

I, John Davis, certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Wherify
Wireless, Inc;

      2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

      4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small
business issuer and have:

      a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared; and

      b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation.


Date: November 15, 2005

                                                         /s/ John Davis
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         John Davis
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          10,204
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,637
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,819
<INVENTORY>                                     30,777
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                63,622
<PP&E>                                          41,584
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,236
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 107,837
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           24,597
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      4,750
<COMMON>                                        44,876
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,350
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   107,837
<SALES>                                         20,633
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,025
<CGS>                                           12,404
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,579
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,531
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   550
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 763
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,655
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,685
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (30)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    508
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (538)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.03)


</TABLE>
# sec5_sbr_2020

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2020-10	&"Arial,Bold"&10V SBR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"&10IRC Handout February 13, 2020
No. P68/179.

protests 60/29598, etc. (New York).

#### I. B. Cohen & Sons, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Beckworth, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of rubber bulb horns similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Sherwin*International, *Inc.*v. *United States*(54 Cust. Ct. 466, Abstract 69382), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
20 Leading Occupations of Employed Women

Full-time Wage and Salary Workers

2002 Annual Averages

(Employment in thousands)

Women’s

Total Median

Total Employed Usual

Employed (Men and Percent Weekly

Occupation Women Women) Women Earnings

 

Total, 16 years and older 

 (all employed women, full time 

wage and salary workers) 43,773 100,204 43.7 $530

Retail and personal sales workers, 

 including cashiers 1,907 3,519 54.1 326

Secretaries 1,709 1,732 98.7 496

Elementary school teachers 1,677 2,039 82.2 750

Registered nurses 1,597 1,737 91.9 870

Nursing aides, orderlies, 

 and attendants 1,434 1,603 89.5 367

Sales supervisors and proprietors 1,313 3,301 39.8 507

Cashiers 1,036 1,387 74.7 307

Bookkeepers, accounting, 

 and auditing clerks 928 1,011 91.8 500

Accountants and auditors 851 1,424 59.8 734

Investigators and adjusters,

 except insurance 723 972 74.4 495

Receptionists 688 709 97.0 429

Secondary school teachers 639 1,135 56.3 767

Managers, medicine and health 549 714 76.9 750

Social workers 553 753 73.4 632

Managers, food serving 

 and lodging establishments 487 1,031 47.2 517

Cooks, except short order 486 1,395 34.8 303

General office clerks 486 579 83.4 474

Janitors and cleaners 471 1,548 30.4 336

Administrators, education 

 and related fields 453 727 62.3 832

Waiters and waitresses 441 624 70.7 311

(1) Median not available where base is less than 50,000 male workers.

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Annual Averages 2002.
Bulletin No. 2017-16

RBS - 1

DRAFT IRC Handout 12 05 17

Line

No.

USSGL

Acct. USSGL Account Title Begin/End Fed/NonFed Fund Type Reporting Type Code Recip. Cat. Addl. Info.

2.1 153200 Seized Cash Deposited E N CF/DF/EC/EG/EM/EP/ER/ES/ET/GA/TR/UG/US/UT E/U

3.3 131900 Allowance for Loss on Accounts Receivable E F CF/DF/EC/EG/EM/EP/ER/ES/ET/GA/TR/UG/US/UT E/U 7

Part 2 Fiscal Year 2018 Reporting

SUPPLEMENT Section V

USSGL Crosswalk - Reclassified Balance Sheet
##### 



Exhibit 32-5 CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT I, David E. Meador, Manager and Chief Executive Officer of The Detroit Edison
Securitization Funding LLC (the Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my
knowledge and belief: (1) the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended
December 31, 2003 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m or 78o(d)); and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Dated:      March 1, 2004
    
     /s/ DAVID E. MEADORDavid E. Meador
Manager and Chief Executive Officer of
The Detroit Edison Securitization Funding LLC
EXHIBIT 3(b)
                       INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY

                           ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
                                  TO THE
                AMENDED ARTICLES OF ACCEPTANCE, AS AMENDED


     1.   The name of the corporation is INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER 
COMPANY.

     2.   The Amendment adopted is to remove in its entirety ARTICLE 6A, 
Clause 7(B)(c) from the Amended Articles of Acceptance,as amended.

     3.   On January 30, 1997, notice of the meeting, accompanied 
by a copy of the Amendment, was given in the manner provided in the 
Indiana Code to each of the Corporation's shareholders of record.  The 
foregoing Amendment was adopted by the shareholders of the Corporation 
on February 28, 1997.

     4.   On January 29, 1997, the foregoing Amendment was proposed by 
the Board of Directors of the Corporation, which found adoption of the 
Amendment to be in the Corporation's best interest and directed that 
it be submitted to the shareholders of the Corporation for their approval 
at a special meeting on February 28,1997.

     5. Holders of the shares of the Corporation's common stock
and preferred stock were eligible to vote separately as a class in
the adoption of the Amendment.  The number of shares of common stock 
and preferred stock voted for the Amendment was sufficient to approve 
the Amendment.  The designation, the number of outstanding shares on 
the record date, the number of votes entitled to be cast by each voting 
group entitled to vote separately on the foregoing Amendment and the 
undisputed number of votes cast for, against and abstaining from the 
Amendment were as follows:

<TABLE>
                           Entitled
Class         Outstanding  to Vote      For       Against  Abstain
<S>           <C>          <C>          <C>       <C>      <C>  
Cumulative 
Preferred 
Stock, par 
value $100 
per share     1,569,767    1,569,767   1,210,512   93,188   1,146

Common Stock
no par value  1,400,000    1,400,000   1,400,000      -0-     -0-

</TABLE>
                                   INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY

                                   By_/s/ John M. Adams, Jr.
                                      John M. Adams, Jr.
                                      Assistant Secretary
March 6, 1997
Robison Engineering Company, Inc 846 Victorian Avenue, Suite 20 , Sparks, NV 89431

U .S. Department of Transportation Docket Operations 775-852-2251 - www . robisoneng.com

West Building Ground Floor , Room w 12-140 1200 New J ersey Avenue , S. E. Date: October 27, 2015 Washington , DC 20590
SUBJECT: Application to Ammend Section 333 Exemption No . 11585 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-0442 Dear Sir or Madam , As petitioner of th e previously granted Exemption No. 11 585 for a sense Fly eBee RTK unmanned aircraft (UA), Robi so n Engineering Company requests an amendment to add the DJI Pha ntom 2 and DJI Ph antom 3 mu lti- rotor UA to the exemptio n . The purpose is to add an addi ti onal a i rcraft to our fleet to help our flight operatio ns adhere to the lim itatio ns and ru les laid out in the exemption. The vertica l take-off and land ing (VTO L) aircraft will a llow us to adhere to the 500ft buffe r from people and property without risk of overf lyin g. Th e hovering and turn -on -l ocation capability of this VT OL wil l a lso a ll ow us to avoid property over which we do not have permission to f ly , whi le gatherin g data close ly adj acent to such property. We request no change to the l i mitations and gu id e lin es previously set and affirm that a ll these same rules wi ll be adhered to as orig inally stated in the exemption. With the DJI Phantom se ri es being the most w idely approved UA i n the docket system, we believe the technical specifications and flight parameters are fami l iar to the FAA , with an acceptab le safety record when responsibly operated. Attached hereto is the DJI Phantom user's manual for reference. Please let me know if you need anything else, and contact me any time.
NGINEERING COMPANY

Nat an ar Robi son, PE , WRS President , Princi pal Engineer 775-852 -225 1 X 700 nathan @robisonenq.com

Page 1 of 1
# C_2017293EN.01001101.xml

| 4.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 293/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.9.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 293/11

---

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 13 July 2017 — European Commission v Kingdom of Spain

(Case C-388/16) (1)

1

((Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Judgment of the Court establishing a failure to fulfil obligations - Non-execution - Article 260(2) TFEU - Pecuniary penalties - Lump sum))

(2017/C 293/14)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: L. Nicolae and S. Pardo Quintillán, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: A. Sampol Pucurull and A. Rubio González, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Declares that, by failing to adopt the measures necessary to comply with the judgment of 11 December 2014 in Commission v Spain (C-576/13, not published, EU:C:2014:2430) by the expiry of the period prescribed in the letter of formal notice sent by the European Commission, namely 20 September 2015, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 260(1) TFEU. |
| --- | --- |

1)

Declares that, by failing to adopt the measures necessary to comply with the judgment of 11 December 2014 in Commission v Spain (C-576/13, not published, EU:C:2014:2430) by the expiry of the period prescribed in the letter of formal notice sent by the European Commission, namely 20 September 2015, the Kingdom of Spain has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 260(1) TFEU.

| 2) | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the European Commission a lump sum of EUR 3 million. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the European Commission a lump sum of EUR 3 million.

| 3) | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3)

Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 314, 29.8.2016.

1

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ECEM EUROPEAN CHEMICAL :

MARKETING B.V., : CIVIL ACTION

:

Plaintiff, : NO. 05-3078

 :

v. :

:

THE PUROLITE COMPANY, :

:

:

Defendant. :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 29 day of January 2010, upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion in th

Limine to Bar Evidence of Plaintiff’s “Terms and Conditions of Sale” document (Doc. No. 60),

Plaintiff’s Response in Opposition to the Motion in Limine (Doc. No. 72), Plaintiff’s Reply on

Parol Evidence Issues (Doc. No. 73), Defendant’s Supplemental Brief in Support of the Motion

in Limine (Doc. No. 80), and Plaintiff’s Supplemental Brief in Opposition (Doc. No. 81), and for

the reasons stated in the Opinion dated January 29, 2010, it is ORDERED that Defendant’s

Motion in Limine (Doc. No. 60) is DENIED. 

BY THE COURT: 

 /s/ Joel H. Slomsky, J. 

 JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J
Ex
      32.1


**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





**CERTIFICATION**








By
      signing below, each of the undersigned officers hereby certifies pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002, that, to his or her knowledge, (i) this report fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
      and (ii) the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Vectren
      Utility Holdings, Inc.




Signed
      this 1st day of March, 2006.



















/s/
                Jerome A. Benkert, Jr.
            
            /s/
                Niel C. Ellerbrook(Signature
                of Authorized Officer)
            
            (Signature
                of Authorized Officer)Jerome
                A. Benkert, Jr.
            
            Niel
                C. Ellerbrook(Typed
                Name)
            
            (Typed
                Name)Executive
                Vice President &
              Chief
                Financial Officer
            
            Chairman
                & Chief Executive Officer(Title)
            
            (Title)
# C_2022024EN.01003402.xml

| 17.1.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 24/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.1.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 24/34

---

Order of the General Court of 17 November 2021 — Trasta Komercbanka v ECB

(Case T-247/16 RENV) (1)

(Action for annulment - Prudential supervision of credit institutions - Specific supervisory tasks assigned to the ECB - Decision to withdraw a credit institution’s authorisation - Action becoming devoid of purpose - Interest in bringing proceedings ceasing to exist - No need to adjudicate)

(2022/C 24/45)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Trasta Komercbanka AS (Riga, Latvia) (represented by: O. Behrends, lawyer)

Defendant: European Central Bank (ECB) (represented by: E. Koupepidou and C. Hernández Saseta, acting as Agents, and by B. Schneider and M. Petite, lawyers)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Republic of Latvia (represented by: K. Pommere, acting as Agent), European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci and A. Steiblytė, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of decision ECB/SSM/2016 — 529900WIP0INFDAWTJ81/1 WOANCA-2016-0005 of the ECB of 3 March 2016, adopted pursuant to Article 4(1)(a) and Article 14(5) of Council Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 of 15 October 2013 conferring specific tasks on the European Central Bank concerning policies relating to the prudential supervision of credit institutions (OJ 2013 L 287, p. 63).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to rule on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to rule on the action.

| 2. | Trasta Komercbanka AS and the European Central Bank (ECB) shall bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Trasta Komercbanka AS and the European Central Bank (ECB) shall bear their own costs.

| 3. | The Republic of Latvia and the European Commission shall each bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The Republic of Latvia and the European Commission shall each bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 270, 25.7.2016.

---
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Cap RockEnergy Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Melissa D. Davis, Vice President, Controller and Chief AccountingOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 

Dated:  March 29, 2006

 

 
|   | By:                                                      | /s/  Melissa D. Davis |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------|--------|
|   | Melissa  D. Davis                                        |
|   | Vice  President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |
|   | (Principal  Financial and Principal Accounting Officer)  |

 

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Cap Rock Energy Corporation and will be retained by Cap Rock EnergyCorporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ROSALIE BERGERON . * CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-CV-145

VERSUS * MDL NO. 02-20136

AMERICAN HOME PRODUCTS * HONORABLE HARVEY BARTLE, III

CORPORATION, ET AL.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

MOTION TO SUBSTITUTE COUNSEL

NOWNOW INNOW INTONOW INTO NOW INTO COURNOW INTO COURT, through undersigned cou

CorporationCorporation (hereinafter sometimes referred to as SmithKline ), upon representing Corporation (herein

SmithKlineSmithKline desires to substitute Charles M. Steen with the law firm of Steen, McShane &

Williamson,Williamson, L.LWilliamson, L.L.C., in pWilliamson, L.L.C., in place of Stephanie G. McShan

Beecham Corporation. 

WHERWHEREFORE,WHEREFORE, SWHEREFORE, SmithKline Beecham Corporation respectfully 

anan Order substituting Charles M. Steen with the law firman Order substituting Charles M. Steen with the law firm 

in place of Stephanie G. McShane as counsel of record for SmithKline Beecham Corporation.

Case 2:02-cv-20136-HB Document 2 Filed 07/29/2002 Page 1 of 3
Page 2 of 3

Respectfully submitted,

 STEEN, McSHANE & WILLIAMSON, L.L.C.

__________________________________________

CHARLES M. STEEN, T.A. (#12420)

MARIE RUDD POSEY (#22534)

1250 Energy Centre

1100 Poydras Street

New Orleans, Louisiana 70163-1250

Telephone: (504) 599-8440

COUNSEL FOR SMITHKLINE

BEECHAM CORPORATION

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

II do herebyI do hereby certify that I have on this ________I do hereby certify that I have on this ________ 

ofof the foregoing pleading, by mailing the same by United States Mail,of the foregoing pleading, by mailing the s

classclass postage prepaid, or by hand delivery on counsel for allclass postage prepaid, or by hand delivery on coun

all parties.

____________________________________

Case 2:02-cv-20136-HB Document 2 Filed 07/29/2002 Page 2 of 3
Page 3 of 3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ROSALIE BERGERON . * CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-CV-145

VERSUS * MDL NO. 02-20136

AMERICAN HOME PRODUCTS * HONORABLE HARVEY BARTLE, III

CORPORATION, ET AL.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

ORDER

CONSIDERING THE FOREGOING Motion to Substitute Counsel; 

ITIT ISIT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Charles M. Steen with the law firm of Steen, McShane &

Williamson,Williamson, L.L.C., be, and is hereby, enrolled as counsel of recordWilliamson, L.L.C., be, and 

Corporation,Corporation, and Stephanie G. McShane is deleted as counsel of record foCorporation, and Stephan

Corporation,

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania this ____ day of ______________, 2002.

____________________________________

J U D G E

Case 2:02-cv-20136-HB Document 2 Filed 07/29/2002 Page 3 of 3
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 20

- 00484

- CV
Juana Laguna, Joanna Gonzalez Acevedo, as Administrator of the Estate of Regino Gonzalez Jr. v. Raymond R. Fulp III, D.O. and Ray Fulp Orthopedics, PA
On Appeal from the 92nd District Court of Hidalgo C ounty , Texas Trial Court Cause No. C

- 0973

- 13

- A

- 1

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and the cause remanded to the trial court . The Court orders th e judgment of the trial court REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with its opinion . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against appell ee s

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. Ju ly 21 , 2022