alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017121EN.01001001.xml

| 18.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 121/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 121/10

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio (Italy) lodged on 19 December 2016 — Hitachi Rail Italy Investments Srl v Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa (Consob)

(Case C-655/16)

(2017/C 121/14)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Hitachi Rail Italy Investments Srl

Applicant:

Defendant: Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa (Consob)

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Is the proper application of the second subparagraph of Article 5(4) of Directive 2004/25/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on takeover bids, (1) in the light of the general principles laid down in Article 3(1) thereof, and in the light of the proper application of the general principles of European law relating to legal certainty, protection of legitimate expectations, proportionality, reasonableness, transparency and non-discrimination, prevented by a provision of national law such as Article 106(3)(d)(2) of Legislative Decree No 58 of 24 February 1998 (consolidating all provisions in the field of financial intermediation within the meaning of Articles 8 and 21 of Law No 52 of 6 February 1996), as subsequently amended, and Article 47 octies of the Decision of the Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa — Consob No 11971 of 14 May 1999 (Order implementing Legislative Decree No 58 of 24 February 1998 laying down rules applicable to offerees), as subsequently amended, in so far as those provisions authorise Consob to increase the takeover bid as referred to in Article 106 where the condition that ‘there has been collusion between the offeror or the persons acting in concert with it and one or more sellers’ is fulfilled, without identifying the specific actions which constitute such a situation, and thus without determining clearly the conditions and criteria under which Consob is authorised to adjust upwards the price of the takeover bid?

1

octies

---

(1)  OJ 2004 L 142, p. 12.

1

---
Part 1

SUPPLEMENT

USSG

L Acct. USSGL Account Title

Anticipated

Budg/ 

Prop

Norm 

Bal

Begin

/ End

Debit/ 

Credit

Auth 

Type 

Code

Apport 

Cat

Apport 

Cat B

Avail 

Time

BEA 

Cat

Borrow 

Source

Budgetary 

Impact 

Indicator

Cohort 

Year

Cust/ 

Noncust

Exch/ 

Nonexch

Fed/ 

Nonfed

Trading 

Prtnr

Trading 

Partner 

Main

PY

Adj DEFC

Pgm 

Rpt 

Cat

Reimb 

Flag

Year 

of 

BA

Reduction 

Type BOC Fund Type

Reporting 

Type 

Code

Financing 

Account 

Code

TAS 

Status

Trans. 

Code

123500 Foreign Currency Held Outside Of Treasury - Non-Budgetary N BP D B/E D N DF E/F/U N U/E X/K/N

137400 Criminal Restitution Receivable N P D B/E D/C A/S N CF/EC/EG/EM/EP/ER/ES/ET/GA/MR/TR/UG/US/UT E/F/U D/G/N U/E X/K/N

412250 Federal Financing Bank (FFB) - Net Principal Payments N B D E D/C X M B/P/X A/B/C/D/

E/F/G/H/

I/J/K/L/

M/N/O/P

/Q/R/S/T

/U/V/W/

X/Y/Z

R ER E/F/U N U N

423100 Unfilled Customer Orders With Advance - Transferred N B C E D/C S D/M 1001/1992-

2022

E/F/N B/X A/B/C/D/

E/F/G/H/

I/J/K/L/

M/N/O/P

/Q/R/S/T

/U/V/W/

X/Y/Z

R EC/EG/EM/EP/ER/ES/ET/TR E/F/U D/G/N U/E X/K/N

U S S G L A C C O U N T USSGL ATTRIBUTES B U L K F I L E A T T R I B U T E S T A S A T T R I B U T E S

Fiscal Year 2021 Reporting

U.S. Standard General Ledger - Attribute Table

Section IV

Bulletin No. 2021-20 Draft August 2021 IRC
No. 59990.

#### Frank P. Dow Co., Inc., and Inter-Continental Trading Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 229070-K (Portland, Oreg.).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of wooden containers of typewriters which constitute the usual and ordinary con*459tainers of typewriters and are not suitable for any other use. On the record presented and following *United States*v. *American Railway Express Co.*(11 Ct. Cust. Appls. 211, T. D. 38968), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 162 (Thursday, August 21, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 49554]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-19907]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 8334]

Culturally Significant Object Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Jean-Michel Basquiat's Glenn''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority No. 
257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the object to be 
included in the exhibition ``Jean-Michel Basquiat's Glenn,'' imported 
from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, is of 
cultural significance. The object is imported pursuant to a loan 
agreement with the foreign owner or custodian. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit object at The Museum of Modern 
Art, New York, NY, from on or about September 30, 2014, until on or 
about September 30, 2019, and at possible additional exhibitions or 
venues yet to be determined, is in the national interest. I have 
ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be published in the 
Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit object, contact Julie Simpson, Attorney-Adviser, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6467). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, SA-5, L/PD, 
Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: August 14, 2014.
Kelly Keiderling,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2014-19907 Filed 8-20-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
# C_2018005EN.01003102.xml

| 8.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 5/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 5/31

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 November 2017 — Claranet Europe v EUIPO — Claro (claranet)

(Case T-129/16) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark claranet - Earlier Benelux word mark CLARO - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)))

(2018/C 005/41)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Claranet Europe Ltd (St Helier, Jersey) (represented by: G. Crown, D. Farnsworth and O. Fairhurst, Solicitors, and A. Bryson, Barrister)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Bonne, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Claro SA (São Paulo, Brazil)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 January 2016 (Case R 803/2015-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Claro and Claranet Europe.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Claranet Europe Ltd to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Claranet Europe Ltd to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

---

(1)  OJ C 175, 17.5.2016.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Merrill Lynch Preferred
Capital Trust IV (the "Trust") and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding IV, L.P.
for the period ended September 29, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marlene Debel,
Regular Trustee of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.





                              MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST IV


                              By:  /s/ MARLENE DEBEL
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                              Name:    Marlene Debel *
                              Title:   Regular Trustee









Dated: November 8, 2006
______________________

* Marlene Debel functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
  and Chief  Financial  Officer of the Trust for  purposes  of Section  906
  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-50798

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

MICHAEL LOUIS DEGNER, also known as Michael L. Deger, also known as 

Michael L. Degner,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 6:05-CR-115-1

Before REAVLEY, ELROD, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Michael Louis Degner has moved 

for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th 

Cir. 2011). Degner has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief 

and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

April 20, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-50798 Document: 00513473100 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/20/2016
No. 15-50798

2

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. 

 Case: 15-50798 Document: 00513473100 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/20/2016
|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                             |                                                                                                 |                                    |
|----------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
| May                20, 2008 |                                                                                            | /s/ Vincent                Sheeran |
|                             | Vincent                Sheeran, Chief Executive Officer (Principal                Executive Officer) |

*This      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not deemed filed by the Company*
*and      is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under      the      Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made      before or after the date of the Report), irrespective of any general      incorporation language contained in such filing*
*.*

----
Before the Second Division,

March 11, 1948

No. 52213.

protest 133284-K (New York).

#### Hudson Shipping Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

*280Opinion by

Tilson, J.

When the case was called for trial it was agreed between the respective parties that the involved merchandise consists of artificial flowers composed in chief value of material other than yarns, threads, or filaments. The claim at 60 percent under paragraph 1518 was therefore sustained.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3861 

To terminate the United States-People’s Republic of China Income Tax Convention if the People’s Liberation Army initiates an armed attack against 

Taiwan. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 5, 2024 

Mr. CORNYN (for himself, Mr. COONS, Mr. CASSIDY, and Ms. CORTEZ MASTO) 

introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Relations 

A BILL 

To terminate the United States-People’s Republic of China 

Income Tax Convention if the People’s Liberation Army 

initiates an armed attack against Taiwan. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. CONDITIONAL TERMINATION OF THE UNITED 

4 STATES-PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA IN5 COME TAX CONVENTION. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Treasury 

7 shall provide written notice to the People’s Republic of 

8 China through diplomatic channels of the United States’ 

9 intent to terminate the United States-The People’s RepubVerDate Sep 11 2014 18:48 Mar 07, 2024 Jkt 049200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S3861.IS S3861

ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 3861 IS

1 lic of China Income Tax Convention, done at Beijing April 

2 30, 1984 and entered into force January 1, 1987, as pro3 vided by Article 28 of the Convention, not later than 30 

4 days after the President notifies the Secretary of the 

5 Treasury that the People’s Liberation Army has initiated 

6 an armed attack against the Republic of China (commonly 

7 known as ‘‘Taiwan’’). 

8 (b) CONGRESSIONAL NOTIFICATION.—The President 

9 shall submit written notification of a termination de10 scribed in subsection (a) to— 

11 (1) the Committee on Foreign Relations of the 

12 Senate; and 

13 (2) the Committee on Finance of the Senate. 

Æ 


ssavage on LAPJG3WLY3PROD with BILLS
Case 2:05-cv-01099-ER Document 83 Filed 05/22/06 Page 1 of 8
Case 2:05-cv-01099-ER Document 83 Filed 05/22/06 Page 2 of 8
Case 2:05-cv-01099-ER Document 83 Filed 05/22/06 Page 3 of 8
Case 2:05-cv-01099-ER Document 83 Filed 05/22/06 Page 4 of 8
Case 2:05-cv-01099-ER Document 83 Filed 05/22/06 Page 5 of 8
Case 2:05-cv-01099-ER Document 83 Filed 05/22/06 Page 6 of 8
Case 2:05-cv-01099-ER Document 83 Filed 05/22/06 Page 7 of 8
Case 2:05-cv-01099-ER Document 83 Filed 05/22/06 Page 8 of 8
# sf133_schp--OUTPUT

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2022-16	&"Arial,Bold"&9V SF 133/Sch P - &P	&"Arial,Bold"&10IRC Handout August 17, 2022
Attachment1_fireproof-exemption-request_extension-2015-07-30.docPage 1 of 2

SENSENICH WOOD PROPELLER CO., INC. 

AREA CODE 813

PHONE - 752-3711

FAX - 752-2818

2008 WOOD COURT

PLANT CITY,FL USA

33563

See us on the Web @ www.sensenich.com

July 30, 2015

U.S. Dept. of Transportation

Docket Operations, M-30

West Building ground floor,

Room W12-140

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE.

Washington, DC 20590

Dear Sirs,

Sensenich Wood Propeller Company, Inc. requests an extension for exemption from 

Title 14 CFR Part 45.11 b (fire proof markings for TCed products). This Exemption was 

first granted June 29, 2001 under Exemption No. 7559, Regulatory Docket No. FAA2000-8498, extended on September 2, 2004 under Exemption No. 8394, extended on 

December 8, 2008 under Exemption 9800, and extended on August 29, 2013 under 

Exemption 9800A. Since the original petition remains essentially valid, Sensenich 

Wood Propeller Co. requests an extension for Petition No. 7559 with one additional 

Type Certificate added to the exemption. 

There are no changes to the original petition.

Two documents support the original Petition for Exemption:

-document for original petition application, dated 11-16-00, Attachment2_fireproofexemption-r4.pdf

-fax of additional comments to original petition, dated 3-3-01, Attachment3_faafireproof-magruder-030101-f.pdf
Attachment1_fireproof-exemption-request_extension-2015-07-30.docPage 2 of 2

It was discovered after the 2008 exemption that Sensenich Type Certificate 

P27NE was not included on the list of exempted wooden propeller type certificates. 

Since this type certificate also pertains to Sensenich fixed pitch wooden propellers, 

Sensenich believes it should be added to the exempted list of type certificates.

Sensenich is requesting again that all our active wooden propeller Type 

Certificates be included under this exemption, including TCDS P-170, TC P27NE, and 

TC P00001NY.

Thank you for your attention to this matter. Please contact me with any questions.

Sincerely,

Steve Boser

Engineering Manager
Case 2:05-cv-01103-PBT Document 132 Filed 08/28/2009 Page 1 of 1
IPAC Operational Metrics for February 2017
No. 57240.

protests 190446-K, etc. (New York).

#### Freund-Mayer *&*Co., Inc., and H. W. Robinson & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

*410Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise are similar in all material respects to the merchandise the subject of *Freund Mayer & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(39 C. C. P. A. 123, C. A. D. 474), the claim at 15 percent under the provision in paragraph-1413 for paper, embossed, cut, die-cut, or stamped into shapes, as modified by T. D. 51802, was sustained. Other items of the merchandise stipulated 'to consist of manufactures of paper wadding or manufactures of pulp wadding similar in all material respects to importations of manufactures of paper wadding and manufactures of pulp wadding which are currently being so classified pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 1404, as modified by T. D. 51802, were held dutiable at 6 cents per pound and 7H percent ad valorem.
##### 



Exhibit 32.01

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the
Quarterly Report of CSK Auto Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ending
November 2, 2003 (the Report) for the purpose of complying with Rule
13a-14(b) or Rule 15d -14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States
Code.

Maynard L. Jenkins, the Chief Executive Officer and Don W. Watson, the Chief
Financial Officer of CSK Auto Corporation, each certifies that to the best of
their knowledge:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of CSK Auto
Corporation.
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/ Maynard L. Jenkins

Maynard L. Jenkins
Chief Executive Officer

December 12, 2003

/s/ Don W. Watson

Don W. Watson
Chief Financial Officer

December 12, 2003
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

LARRY PHILLIPS [GF-3404], : CIVIL ACTION

Petitioner, :

:

v. :

:

SUPERINTENDENT OF :

 SCI-HUNTINGDON, et al., : NO. 05-3042

Respondents. :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 21st day of February, 2007, upon careful and independent

consideration of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus, and after review of the Report and

Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge David R. Strawbridge and objections

thereto, it is ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

2. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED; 

3. A certificate of appealability SHALL NOT issue, in that the Petitioner has not

made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. See 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); and

4. The Clerk of the Court shall mark this case CLOSED for statistical purposes.

BY THE COURT:

 

BERLE M. SCHILLER, J.

Case 2:05-cv-03042-BMS Document 14 Filed 02/22/07 Page 1 of 1
October 2, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellant

NO. 14-14-00054-CR V.

BRIAN WEI, Appellee

________________________________

This cause was heard on the transcript of the record of the court below. 

Having considered the record, this Court holds that there was no error in the 

judgment. The Court orders the judgment AFFIRMED.

We further order appellant pay all costs expended in the appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 1SUPPLEMENT	&"Arial,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2022 ReportingSection VII

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2022-16	&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000DRAFT&K000000 VII ESR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout 8/17/22
Exhibit
      23.1





CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS





As
      independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation of our
      report included in this Form 10-K, into the Company's previously filed
      Registration Statements on Form S-8 File Nos. 33-63816, 33-79360, 333-4634,
      333-84471, 333-103847, 333-122181 and 333-151218.





/s/
                Rotenberg and Co., LLPRotenberg
                and Co., LLP





Rochester,
      New York





November
      13, 2008





1
No. 52533.

protests 67429-K, etc. (New York).

#### Comimex, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

*201Opinion by

Cole, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise in question is the same in all material respects as the estrogenic hormone passed upon *Roche-Organon*v. *United States*(35 C. C. P. A. 99, C. A. D. 378). The claim at 10 percent under paragraph 34 was therefore sustained.