alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
VI 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1625 

For the relief of Nury Chavarria. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 25, 2017 

Mr. BLUMENTHAL introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

For the relief of Nury Chavarria. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. PERMANENT RESIDENT STATUS FOR NURY 

4 CHAVARRIA. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding subsections (a) 

6 and (b) of section 201 of the Immigration and Nationality 

7 Act (8 U.S.C. 1151), Nury Chavarria shall be eligible for 

8 issuance of an immigrant visa or for adjustment of status 

9 to that of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent resi10 dence upon filing an application for issuance of an immi11 grant visa under section 204 of such Act (8 U.S.C. 1154) 

12 or for adjustment of status to lawful permanent resident. 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1625 IS

1 (b) ADJUSTMENT OF STATUS.—If Nury Chavarria 

2 enters the United States before the filing deadline speci3 fied in subsection (c), Nury Chavarria shall be considered 

4 to have entered and remained lawfully in the United 

5 States and shall be eligible for adjustment of status under 

6 section 245 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 

7 U.S.C. 1255) as of the date of the enactment of this Act. 

8 (c) APPLICATION AND PAYMENT OF FEES.—Sub9 sections (a) and (b) shall apply only if the application for 

10 the issuance of an immigrant visa or the application for 

11 adjustment of status is filed with appropriate fees not 

12 later than 2 years after the date of the enactment of this 

13 Act. 

14 (d) REDUCTION OF IMMIGRANT VISA NUMBERS.— 

15 Upon the granting of an immigrant visa or permanent res16 idence to Nury Chavarria, the Secretary of State shall in17 struct the proper officer to reduce by 1, during the current 

18 or next following fiscal year— 

19 (1) the total number of immigrant visas that 

20 are made available to natives of the country of birth 

21 of Nury Chavarria under section 203(a) of the Im22 migration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1153(a)); 

23 or 

24 (2) if applicable, the total number of immigrant 

25 visas that are made available to natives of the counVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:06 Jul 26, 2017 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S1625.IS S1625

rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1625 IS

1 try of birth of Nury Chavarria under section 202(e) 

2 of such Act (8 U.S.C. 1152(e)). 

3 (e) PAYGO.—The budgetary effects of this Act, for 

4 the purpose of complying with the Statutory Pay-As-You5 Go Act of 2010, shall be determined by reference to the 

6 latest statement titled ‘‘Budgetary Effects of PAYGO 

7 Legislation’’ for this Act, submitted for printing in the 

8 Congressional Record by the Chairman of the Committee 

9 on the Budget of the Senate, provided that such statement 

10 has been submitted prior to the vote on passage. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this date I caused a true and correct copy of Defendants’

Motion for Summary Judgment and Memorandum of Law in Support thereof, to be

served by United States Mail, First Class Service, properly addressed and postage

prepaid, upon the following:

Anita F. Alberts, Esquire

301 South Main Street

The Atrium, Suite W-2

Doylestown, PA 18901

Attorney for Plaintiff

 S/Sidney L.Gold, Esquire-SG1387 

SIDNEY L. GOLD, ESQUIRE

Attorney for Defendant

January 10, 2005

Case 2:02-cv-04421-PBT Document 23-3 Filed 01/10/2005 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 13.2**

**Certification**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)**

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), theundersigned officer of Allianz SE, a European Company (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that: 

The AnnualReport on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the “Report”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Date: March 31, 2009
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                     EXHIBIT 12


                    MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST IV
                    MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING IV, L.P.
                      COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO
          COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED SECURITIES DISTRIBUTIONS
                             (dollars in thousands)



                               FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED           FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                     APRIL 1, 2005                      MARCH 26, 2004
                           ---------------------------------  ---------------------------------
                              MERRILL LYNCH    MERRILL LYNCH     MERRILL LYNCH    MERRILL LYNCH
                                 PREFERRED       PREFERRED          PREFERRED       PREFERRED
                           CAPITAL TRUST IV  FUNDING IV,L.P.  CAPITAL TRUST IV  FUNDING IV,L.P.
                           ----------------- ---------------  ----------------- ---------------

<S>                        <C>                 <C>            <C>               <C>

Earnings                       $  7,340           $  8,577      $    7,340          $   8,559
                               ========           ========        ========           ========


Fixed charges                  $      -           $      -        $      -           $      -

Preferred securities
 distribution
 requirements                     7,120              7,340           7,120              7,340
                               --------           --------        --------           --------

Total combined fixed
 charges and preferred
 securities distribution
 requirements                  $  7,120           $  7,340           7,120           $  7,340
                               ========           ========        ========           ========

Ratio of earnings to
 combined fixed charges
 and preferred securities
 distribution requirements         1.03               1.17            1.03               1.17


</TABLE>
July 8. 2015 U.S. Dept. ofTransportation, Docket Operations West Building Ground Floor, Room w12-140 Washington, DC 20590 AMENDMENTTO REGULATORY DOCKET:

Dear Sir or Madam: FAA-2015-1549-0001

Tadsen Photography LLC is hereby amending its Exemption Request submitted April 21, 2015 (/{Application") under Regulatory Docket FAA-2015-1549-001 to include the activity:
• Closed Set Filming For all ofthe reasons listed in the Application and enumerated in the attached documents, this Exemption Request is also in the public interest, within the FAA's authority, and not adangertothe NAS. The safety precautions and procedures mandated and followed byTadsen Photography LLC to create an equivalent level of safety are enumerated in the attached confidential document, Tadsen Motion Picture and Television Operating Manual (/{MPTOM"). 1 The Motion Picture Association ofAmerica and FAA has reviewed and approved other MPTOMs substantially similartothis manual and found them to be acceptable for closed set UAS filming operationsforthetelevision and movie industry. Applicant submitsthe attached MPTOM and appendices as a Confidential Document under 14 CFR 11.35 (b) as the the entire manual contains proprietary informationthat the applicant has not and will notshare with others. The manual contains operating conditions and procedures that are not available to the public and are protected from release underthe Freedom of Information Act 5 USC 552 et.seq.

1The conditions proposed by the applicant regarding Closed Set Filming are drawn from Order 8900.1 CHG 0, Volume 3, Chapter 8-lssue a Certificate ofWaiverfor Motion Picture and Television Filming. ''

. '--- 'Page 2 of 2

Ifyou have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact ouroffice. Sincerely,

# a~d,Esq. AttorneyforTadsen Photography LLC Law Office ofJoshua Furnald 2150 East Washington Ave. Madison, Wisconsin 53704 {608) 347-3471
# Main

&"Arial,Bold"Part 1SUPPLEMENT	DRAFT	&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2016 ReportingSection V

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2017-01	&"Arial,Bold"V SBR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout 12-08-16
# C_2016305EN.01003801.xml

| 22.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 305/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 305/38

---

Order of the General Court of 2 June 2016 — Rabbit v EUIPO — DMG Media (rabbit)

(Case T-4/16) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Withdrawal of the opposition - No need to adjudicate))

(2016/C 305/52)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Rabbit, Inc. (Redwood City, California, United States) (represented by: M. Engelman, Barrister, and J. Stephenson, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: H. O'Neill, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: DMG Media Ltd (London, United Kingdom)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 October 2015 (Case R 2133/2014-2), relating to opposition proceedings between DMG Media Ltd and Rabbit, Inc.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | Rabbit, Inc. is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Rabbit, Inc. is ordered to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

---

(1)  OJ C 156, 2.5.2016.

1

---
##### 



Exhibit 3.2
 Volume I  Exhibit 4.
 Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws of First BancTrust Corporation




---



##### 



BYLAWS
OF
FIRST BANCTRUST CORPORATION
 ARTICLE I. OFFICES
 Registered Office and Registered Agent
 Other Offices
 ARTICLE II. STOCKHOLDERS MEETINGS
 Meeting Place
 Annual Meeting
 Organization
 Special Meetings.
  2




---



##### 



Notice
   Record List of Stockholders
 Quorum: Actions of Stockholders.
    3




---



##### 



Voting of Shares.
 Closing of Transfer Books and Fixing of the Record Date
 Proxies
 Waiver of Notice
 Voting of Shares in the Name of Two or More Persons
  4




---



##### 



Voting of Shares by Certain Holders
 Proposals
  5




---



##### 



Inspectors.
  6




---



##### 



ARTICLE III. CAPITAL STOCK
 Uncertificated Stock; Certificates
 (a)
    
    that the Corporation is organized under the laws of the State of Delaware;(b)
    
    the name of the person to whom issued;(c)
    
    the number and class of shares and the designation of the series, if any,
which such certificate represents; and(d)
    
    the par value of each share represented by such certificate, or a statement
that such shares are without par value.
 Transfers
    7




---



##### 



Registered Owner
 Lost, Stolen or Destroyed Certificates
 Fractional Shares or Scrip
 Shares of Another Corporation
 ARTICLE IV. BOARD OF DIRECTORS
 Powers
  8




---



##### 



Classification, Term and Qualifications st th
 Number of Directors.
 Vacancies
 Removal of Directors
 Regular Meetings
 Special Meetings
    9




---



##### 



Waiver of Notice
 Quorum: Actions of the Board of Directors.
 Action by Directors Without a Meeting
 Action by Directors by Communications Equipment
 Registered Dissent
  10




---



##### 



Executive and Other Committees.
 Remuneration
 Nominations of Directors
  11




---



##### 



Directors Emeritus.
 ARTICLE V. OFFICERS
 Designations
  12




---



##### 



Powers and Duties
 Delegation
 Vacancies.
 Term  Removal
 Bonds.
 ARTICLE VI. INDEMNIFICATION, ETC. OF DIRECTORS,
OFFICERS AND EMPLOYEES
 Indemnification
 Advancement of Expenses
  13




---



##### 



Other Rights and Remedies.
 Insurance.
 Modification.
 ARTICLE VII. DIVIDENDS; FINANCE; AND FISCAL YEAR
 Dividends
 Disbursements.
 Depositories.
  14




---



##### 



Fiscal Year. st
 ARTICLE VIII. NOTICES
  ARTICL IX. SEAL
  ARTICLE X. BOOKS AND RECORDS
  ARTICLE XI. AMENDMENTS
 Amendments
 Emergency Bylaws
 ARTICLE XII. USE OF PRONOUNS
   15
# C_2017129EN.01002002.xml

| 24.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/20

---

Judgment of the General Court of 9 March 2017 — Maximum Play v EUIPO (MAXPLAY)

(Case T-400/16) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Application for the EU word mark MAXPLAY - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptiveness - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2017/C 129/33)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Maximum Play, Inc. (San Francisco, California, United States) (represented by: M. Graf, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Zaera Cuadrado, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 May 2016 (Case R 2273/2015-4), concerning an application for registration of the word sign MAXPLAY as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Maximum Play, Inc. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Maximum Play, Inc. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 371, 10.10.2016.

1

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

** **

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of**

**Title 18 Of The United States Code**

 

I, J. Patrick Spainhour, the Chief Executive Officer of The ServiceMaster Company, certify that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2009, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of The ServiceMaster Company.

 

 
|   | /s/ J. Patrick  Spainhour |
|--------|---------------------------|
|   | J. Patrick Spainhour      |
|   | May 15, 2009         |

 

1
# 39

&"Calibri,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2020-21	&"Arial,Bold"&10&KFF0000DRAFT&K01+000 VII EDR - &P      	&"Arial,Bold"&10IRC Handout 7/16/20
No. 51953.

#### Air Express International Agency, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 127247-K (Tampa).

*148Opinion by

Johnson, J.

From an examination of the papers the court was unable to find any evidence sufficient to overcome the action of the collector, which was presumptively correct. The protest was therefore overruled.
HINSHAW 

& ClJLB E RTSOf'.. LLP 

Timothy I. McCulloch 

tmcculloch@hinshawlaw.com 

(602) 383-6011 

VIA EMAIL AND U.S. MAIL 

Mr. Thomas Vick 

Compliance and Land Use Specialist 

FAA Airports Division 

12 New England Executive Park 

Burlington, MA 01803 

November 4, 2014 

ATTORN EYS AT LAW 

3200 N. Central Avenue 

Suite 800 

Phoenix, AZ 85012 

602-631-4400 

602-631-4404 (fax) 

www.hinshawlaw.com 

Re: Boston Executive Helicopters Part 13 

Dear Mr. Vick: 

This firm hereby notifies you of its appearance and representation of Boston Executive 

Helicopters in the Part 13 informal complaint filed with your office on June 5, 2014 against the 

Norwood Municipal Airport and the Norwood Airport Commission. 

Boston Executive Helicopters hereby withdraws its Part 13 complaint without prejudice 

to its rights to again file the Part 13 complaint, or seek any other judicial or administrative 

remedies available to it. 

If you have any questions regarding the foregoing, please feel free to call the undersigned 

attorney. 

cc: Ms. Mary Walsh 

Mr. Russ McGuire 

Mr. Christopher Donovan 

Very truly yours, 

HINSHAW & CULBERTSON LLP 

G:y I McCul:? 

Building on the Barger Tradition 

Arizona California Florida Illinois Indiana Massachusetts Minnesota Missouri New York Rhode Island Wisconsin + London 

23367647vl 0964237
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 598-2 Filed 09/02/2009 Page 1 of 9
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 598-2 Filed 09/02/2009 Page 2 of 9
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 598-2 Filed 09/02/2009 Page 3 of 9
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 598-2 Filed 09/02/2009 Page 4 of 9
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 598-2 Filed 09/02/2009 Page 5 of 9
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 598-2 Filed 09/02/2009 Page 6 of 9
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 598-2 Filed 09/02/2009 Page 7 of 9
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 598-2 Filed 09/02/2009 Page 8 of 9
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 598-2 Filed 09/02/2009 Page 9 of 9
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

 

 

FELIX D. WHITTINGTON,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

DONALD VAUGHN, et al.,

 Defendants.

 CIVIL ACTION

 NO. 02-4346

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 1st day of October, 2002, it is hereby ORDERED that the attached

communication shall be filed by the Clerk.

BY THE COURT:

 

_______________________________________

MARVIN KATZ, S.J.

Case 2:02-cv-04346-MK Document 29 Filed 10/01/2002 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WILLIAM SPARKS : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. :

:

DUCKREY ENTERPRISES, INC., :

et al. : NO. 05-2178

ENTRY OF CIVIL JUDGMENT

AND NOW, this 6th day of August, 2012, upon

consideration of the plaintiff’s Request for Default Judgment

[against Duckrey Enterprises, Inc.] (Docket No. 124); after an

on-the-record hearing on the issue of damages on March 13, 2007; 

upon consideration of the plaintiff’s Post-Hearing Submission;

after a supplemental hearing on the issue of damages on August 2,

2011; upon consideration of the plaintiff’s counsel’s

supplemental submission on the issue of attorney’s fees; and for

the reasons stated in a memorandum of law bearing today’s date;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED in accordance with Rules 55(b) and 58 of the

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure that judgment is entered in

favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant Duckrey

Enterprises, Inc. as follows:

1. The plaintiff is awarded $39,118.55 in attorney’s

fees;

2. The plaintiff is awarded $3200 as restitution for

insurance premiums paid.

Case 2:05-cv-02178-MAM Document 142 Filed 08/06/12 Page 1 of 2
The Clerk is, therefore, directed to enter judgment for

the plaintiff and against Duckrey Enterprises, Inc. in the amount

of $42,318.55.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Mary A. McLaughlin

MARY A. McLAUGHLIN, J.

2

Case 2:05-cv-02178-MAM Document 142 Filed 08/06/12 Page 2 of 2
B424 To record a contingent liability.

Comment: Record USSGL account 6790 when pending litigation related to the Treasury Judgment Fund is 

not required to be paid back by the agency. Reverse this entry when realization indicates no 

contingent liability.

Reference: USSGL implementation guidance; FASAB SFFAS No. 3, "Accounting for Inventory and 

Related

Property"

Budgetary Entry

NoneDebit 445000 Unapportioned Authority

Debit 451000 Apportionments

Debit 461000 Allotments – Realized Resources

Debit 462000 Unobligated Funds Exempt From Apportionment

 Credit 470000 Commitments – Programs Subject to Apportionment

 Credit 472000 Commitments – Programs Exempt from Apportionment

Proprietary Entry

Debit 679000 Other Expenses Not Requiring Budgetary Resources

Debit 680000 Future Funded Expenses

Debit 729000 Other Losses

 Credit 292000 Contingent Liabilities

 Credit 292200 Contingent Liabilities - Federal Government Sponsored Enterprise

Formatted Table

Formatted Table

Formatted Table

Formatted Table

Formatted Table

[Type text] DRAFT IRC Handout 2-5-15
Unassociated Document


    


     

    


     

    D.
      Emerald Investments Ltd.

    85
      Medinat Ha Yehudim

    Herzeliya,
      Israel

    


    Attention:
      Mr. Roy Harel

    


    


    Dear
      Sirs:

    


    Reference
      is hereby made to (i) the Guaranty dated as of May 10, 2005 (the “Guaranty”)
      by
      Polystick U.S. Corp. (the “Guarantor”)
      in
      favor of D. Emerald Investments Ltd. (“Emerald”),
      (ii)
      the Pledge Agreement dated as of May 10, 2005 (the “Pledge
      Agreement”)
      between the Guarantor and Emerald and (iii) the Voting Agreement dated May
      11,
      2004 between the Guarantor and Emerald (the “Voting
      Agreement”).

    


    Guarantor
      hereby (i) waives notice of the restatement and amendment of the Convertible
      Note effected pursuant to an agreement between GSV, Inc. and Emerald dated
      as of
      May 10, 2008, and (ii) consents and agrees that each reference to the
      Convertible Note contained in the Guaranty, the Pledge Agreement and the Voting
      Agreement shall be deemed a reference to the Amended and Restated Promissory
      Note dated the date hereof executed to Emerald by GSV, Inc. The Guarantor hereby
      acknowledges and confirms the full force and effect of the Guaranty, the Pledge
      Agreement and the Voting Agreement.

    


    
      	 	Very truly yours,
	 	 
	 	POLYSTICK U.S. CORP.
	 	 
	 	 
	 	 
	 	By  
/s/
              Sagi
              Matza                                                                             
              
	 	
               
Sagi
                Matza  

            
	 	
               
                President
# Data

&"Calibri,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2020-10	&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000DRAFT&K01+000 VII VSR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"&10IRC Handout 2/13/20
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WILLIAM A. GRAHAM COMPANY : CIVIL ACTION

d/b/a THE GRAHAM COMPANY :

 :

v. :

 :

THOMAS P. HAUGHEY AND :

USI MIDATLANTIC, INC. : NO. 05-612

 AMENDED JUDGMENT

AND NOW, this 12th day of May, 2010, for the reasons

set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED

that:

(1) the motion of the plaintiff William A. Graham

Company d/b/a The Graham Company to amend the June 28, 2006

judgment to include prejudgment and postjudgment interest is

GRANTED;

(2) the June 28, 2006 judgment in favor of William A.

Graham Company d/b/a The Graham Company is amended to include an

award of $4,112,859 in prejudgment interest against defendant USI

MidAtlantic, Inc. for a total judgment of $20,674,089 and an

award of $570,542 in prejudgment interest against defendant

Thomas P. Haughey for a total judgment of $2,867,939; and

(3) the June 28, 2006 judgment in favor of William A.

Graham Company d/b/a The Graham Company is also amended to

include an award of postjudgment interest against defendants USI

MidAtlantic, Inc. and Thomas P. Haughey to be calculated from
June 28, 2006 to the date of payment at an annual interest rate

of 5.24% compounded annually.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Harvey Bartle III 

C.J.

-2-