alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 55869.

protest 169223-K (New York).

#### Kopf Manufacturing Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of parts of saddles, which saddles are in part of pigskin and valued at more than $40 each, similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 54419, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Part 1

SUPPLEMENT

DRAFT 

No Name Description Rule Attribute Combination

32E

Is First Year and Year of Budget Authority Indicator Validation

If Is First Year is Y, then Year of BA must be NEW. If Is First Year is N, then Year of BA must be BAL for annual & multiyear TAS when using PYA of X, and can be NEW or BAL for X year TAS and for annual & multiyear TAS when using PYA B or P.

YEAR OF 

BUDGET 

AUTHORITY 

CODE IS FIRST YEAR

CONCATENATE

D TAS

Pass NEW N

08920162017 

0318000

Pass NEW N

08920162017 

0321000

Pass NEW N

08920162017 

0337000

Pass BAL Y

09720182020 

0111000

69E

Limited use of specific USSGL and Fund Type combinations

The use of some USSGL and GTAS Fund Type Code combinations is limited to specific Treasury Account Symbols.

ALLOCATION 

TRANSFER 

AGENCY 

IDENTIFIER

AGENCY 

IDENTIFIER

MAIN ACCOUNT 

CODE

Pass (BLANK) 012 1143 

Pass (BLANK) 075 0580 Pass (BLANK) 075 5551 Pass (BLANK) 015 5608 Pass (BLANK) 075 0580 Pass (BLANK) 480 5589 

90E

Disaster Emergency Fund Code Domain Value Restrictions

The use of DEF Code domain values other than "Q" is limited to specific fund families.

PROGRAM 

COST 

INDICATOR Fund Family

Pass C 0963125Pass C 0970100Pass C 0970130Pass C 0974930Pass C 0860338Pass C 0121072Pass C 0141039Pass C 0141046

U.S. Standard General Ledger

Data Validations - Detail

Bulletin No. 2018-05 DRAFT VII VDR - 1
Case No. 5,285.

#### GAYLORD v. JOHNSON.

[5 McLean, 448.] 1

Circuit Court, D. Indiana.

May Term, 1850.

COURTS — JURISDICTION — CITIZENSHIP — SUIT BETWEEN Assignor and Assignee op Promissory Note.

1. The assignee of a note, a citizen of Ohio, may bring his action in the circuit court against the assignor, a citizen of Indiana.

2. A note made payable in Ohio is an Ohio •contract, and demand of payment when the note is due, protest and notice are due diligence.

3. Where the action is between the assignor and his immediate assignee, it is only -necessary to sustain the jurisdiction of the circuit court that plaintiff and defendant are citizens of different states.

4. The action is on the contract of assignment.

At law.

Mr. Henderson, for plaintiff.

Mr. Ray, for defendant

OPINION OP

THE COURT.

This action is brought by the plaintiff IT. G. Gaylord], as assignee of a promissory note by the defendant [Howard P. Johnson], the payee, who was a citizen of Indiana. Two objections are made by the defendant: (1) That the assignor could not sue in this court, consequently his assignee cannot sue. (2) By the laws of Indiana, the maker of the note must be prosecuted to insolvency, — the note, not being payable to or at a bank, is not negotiable by the laws of Indiana.

This suit is brought against the indorser, to which no objection can be made, under the eleventh section of the judiciary act ![1 Stat. 73], which applies to assignments, where the action is brought by the assignee against the maker of the note. There was a special plea that the note was assigned in Indiana, to which there was a demurrer. 'The note was payable in Ohio, it was therefore an Ohio contract, and governed by the laws of Ohio. Demand of payment of the note when due, protest and notice, are due diligence. As this action is brought against the assignor, by his assignee, the place of assignment is immaterial. The action is founded on the assignment, and the plaintiff ' and defendant are citizens of different states. This gives jurisdiction. The demurrer is sustained, and judgment
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     The undersigned  executive  officers of the Registrant  hereby certify that
this Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2003 (the
"Report") fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,  and the  information  contained in the Report
fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial condition and results
of operations of the Registrant.


                                By: /s/ Gary C. Loraditch
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Name:    Gary C. Loraditch
                                    Title:   President



                                By: /s/ Bonnie M. Klein
                                    -----------------------------------
                                    Name:    Bonnie M. Klein
                                    Title:   Vice President and Treasurer

Date: February 11, 2004
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**











In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Finity Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-QSB”), I,
      Philip Barak, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002,that;





(1)
      The
      Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.







By: /s/
      Philip E. Barak


Chief Financial Officer








Date:
      May 12, 2006








15
No. 51343.

#### Protests 986758-G, etc., of Henry M. Peyser Co., Inc. (New York)

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). In accordance therewith the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Bulletin No. 2018-05 V SNC - 1 June 2018

Part 1

SUPPLEMENT

Line 

No.

USSGL 

Acct. USSGL Account Title

Begin

/ End

Nonfe

d

Exch/ 

Nonexch

Cust/ 

Noncust

Reporting 

Type Code

Addl. 

Info.

1

1 610000 Operating Expenses/Program Costs E F/N E/U

1 615000 Expensed Asset E E/U

1 619000 Contra Bad Debt Expense - Incurred for Others E F/N E/U

1 619900 Adjustment to Subsidy Expense E N E/U

Gross costs (Note 22)

Section V

USSGL Crosswalk - Statement of Net Cost

Fiscal Year 2018 Reporting

Gross Program Costs (Note 22):

Program A:
No. 60012.

#### Homestrand, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 240438-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issues are the same in all material respects as those the subject of *John P. Herber & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(30 Cust. Ct. 193, C. D. 1519), the protests were dismissed, and the matters were remanded to a single judge sitting in reappraisement for determination of the value of the merchandise in the manner provided by law (28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d)).
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1114 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1114

To nullify the effect of the recent Executive order laying a foundation 
    for discrimination against LGBTQ individuals, women, religious 
     minorities, and others under the pretext of religious freedom.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 11, 2017

 Mrs. Feinstein (for herself, Mrs. Murray, Mr. Wyden, Mr. Franken, Mr. 
 Markey, Mrs. Gillibrand, Mr. Whitehouse, Ms. Harris, Ms. Baldwin, Mr. 
 Booker, Mrs. Shaheen, Ms. Hirono, Mr. Coons, Mr. Bennet, Mr. Merkley, 
   Ms. Hassan, Mr. Reed, Mr. Blumenthal, Mr. Durbin, and Mr. Leahy) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                       Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To nullify the effect of the recent Executive order laying a foundation 
    for discrimination against LGBTQ individuals, women, religious 
     minorities, and others under the pretext of religious freedom.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. NULLIFICATION.

    Executive Order 13798 (82 Fed. Reg. 21675; relating to ``Promoting 
Free Speech and Religious Liberty'') shall have no force or effect.
                                 <all>
```
Case 2:05-cv-03035-LS Document 13 Filed 11/21/05 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:05-cv-03035-LS Document 13 Filed 11/21/05 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:05-cv-03035-LS Document 13 Filed 11/21/05 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:05-cv-03035-LS Document 13 Filed 11/21/05 Page 4 of 4
No. 66287.

#### Lep Transport, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 60/30543.

Plaintiff’s application for rehearing granted.
Part 2

SUPPLEMENT

DRAFT Fiscal Year 2024 Reporting

Section VII

Edit

No

Prior

Year

USSGL

Account

Beginning

Ending

Balance

Indicator

Authority

Type Code

TAS

Status

Reporting

Type Code

TAS Status 

Transitioning 

Code

Beginning

Balance

USSGL

Account

21 419300 E D/P/S 420100

U.S. Standard General Ledger

Closing Edits Detail Report

Bulletin No. 2023-04 DRAFT VII CER - 1 IRC Handout 2/15/23
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 15**  **- 6089** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , P laintiff

- Appell ee ,

v. BRENT GARDNER , Defendant

- Appell ant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Orangeburg

. Margaret B. Seymour, Senior District Judge. ( 5:05

- cr - 01156

- MBS

- 1; 5:12

- cv - 03312

- MBS )

Submitted : May 19 , 2015 Decided: May 21, 2015

Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS , Circuit Judges , and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Dismiss ed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Brent Gardner , Appellant Pro Se. Robert Frank Daley, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina , for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURI AM: Brent Gardner seeks to appe al the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 ( 2012 ) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (20 12 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (20 12 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstratin g that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court den ies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independen tly reviewed the record and conclude that Gardner has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1452 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1452

 To amend title 38, United States Code, to establish within the Office 
of the Under Secretary for Health of the Department of Veterans Affairs 
   the position of Chief Information Officer of the Veterans Health 
                Administration, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 28, 2017

Mr. Cruz (for himself, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Young, and Mr. Rubio) introduced 
the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 
                          on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 38, United States Code, to establish within the Office 
of the Under Secretary for Health of the Department of Veterans Affairs 
   the position of Chief Information Officer of the Veterans Health 
                Administration, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Department of Veterans Affairs 
Information Technology Restructuring Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. ESTABLISHMENT OF POSITION OF CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICER OF 
              VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION.

    (a) In General.--Section 7306(a) of title 38, United States Code, 
is amended--
            (1) by redesignating paragraph (10) as paragraph (11); and
            (2) by inserting after paragraph (9) the following new 
        paragraph (10):
            ``(10) The Chief Information Officer of the Veterans Health 
        Administration, who shall--
                    ``(A) serve in a full-time capacity at the Central 
                Office of the Department; and
                    ``(B) be responsible to, and report directly to, 
                the Under Secretary for Health on all matters regarding 
                the procurement, acquisition, and management of 
                information technology systems and services for the 
                Veterans Health Administration.''.
    (b) Initial Appointment.--Not later than 30 days after the date of 
the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall 
appoint an individual to serve as the Chief Information Officer of the 
Veterans Health Administration under section 7306(a)(10) of title 38, 
United States Code, as amended by subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
# sf133_schp_2019

&"Arial,Bold"&10&K000000Bulletin No. 2019-02	&"Arial,Bold"&9DRAFT V SF 133/Sch P - &P	&"Arial,Bold"&10&K000000IRC Handout 12-04-18
# sec4_attribtable_2021

&"Arial,Bold"&10IRC Handout	&"Arial,Bold"&9Draft	&"Arial,Bold"&10April 21, 2021
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
                  IEH CORPORATION

                Exhibits (continued)

              FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
            ARTICLE 5 OF REGULATION S-X
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           4,045
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  782,696
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (10,062)
<INVENTORY>                                    976,169
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,769,060
<PP&E>                                       6,334,007
<DEPRECIATION>                             (5,075,854)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,117,540
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        1,880,104
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     1,151,734
<OTHER-SE>                                   (605,688)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,117,540
<SALES>                                      4,486,573
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,487,284
<CGS>                                        3,219,798
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,219,798
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,071,273
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             141,159
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 55,054
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,200
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             43,854
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    43,854
<EPS-BASIC>                                       .019
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .019


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5


<LEGEND>
EXHIBIT 27:        FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE

THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1999
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    sep-30-1999
<CASH>                                  3,033,098
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                           5,545,425
<ALLOWANCES>                            173,734
<INVENTORY>                             6,635,086
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        16,080,033
<PP&E>                                  5,913,466
<DEPRECIATION>                          3,179,242
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          20,305,751
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   9,295,304
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                                5,156,197
<OTHER-SE>                              3,587,612
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            20,305,751
<SALES>                                 14,302,928
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        14,302,928
<CGS>                                   8,836,320
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           4,786,573
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      147,124
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         532,911
<INCOME-TAX>                            159,230
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     373,681
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                            373,681
<EPS-BASIC>                             0.14
<EPS-DILUTED>                           0.09



</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001051828
<NAME>                        MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING IV
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-25-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JUN-19-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-26-1998
<CASH>                                                   0
<SECURITIES>                                   485,144,000
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,044,902
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                              0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               486,188,902
<PP&E>                                                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 486,188,902
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                    0
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                    413,269,138
<COMMON>                                        72,919,764
<OTHER-SE>                                               0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   486,188,902
<SALES>                                                  0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 1,044,902
<CGS>                                                    0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                            0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                       0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,044,902
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,044,902
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,044,902
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date of Notice:

KEVIN MITCHELL : March 5, 2003

 vs. :

EQUIFAX CREDIT INFORMATION : CIVIL ACTION NOS. 02-3812,

SERVICES, ET AL. 02-4439, 02-4442

TAKE NOTICE that the above-captioned matter is

scheduled for a PRETRIAL CONFERENCE in the United States District

Court, United States Courthouse, 601 Market Street, Philadelphia,

PA, before the Honorable John P. Fullam, on, March 11, 2003 

at 2:00 P.M., in courtroom 15-A on the 15th floor.

If trial counsel is on trial or otherwise engaged at

the time of the scheduled conference, another attorney in such

trial counsel's office should appear at the conference.

THE CONFERENCE WILL BE CONTINUED TO ANOTHER DATE ONLY

IN EXCEPTIONAL CASES.

Very truly yours,

Rosalind Burton-Hoop

Deputy Clerk to Judge Fullam

cc: Mark D. Mailman, Esq. Jonathan D. Weiss, Esq.

 Mark J. Oberstaedt, Esq. John C. Farrell, Esq.

 Steven J. Adams, Esq. Jeffrey P. Bates, Esq.

 Catherine O. Raym, Esq. Howard R. Maniloff, Esq.

 John C. Connell, Esq. Robert J. Martin, Esq.

 John Keim Semler, Esq. Shweta Gupta, Esq.

 Joseph F. Riga, Esq.

 Lewis P. Perling, Esq.

 Timothy P. Creech, Esq. 

Case 2:02-cv-04439-JF Document 18 Filed 03/05/2003 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:02-cv-04439-JF Document 18 Filed 03/05/2003 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                     AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of IEH Corporation (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the year ending March 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert Knoth, Chief
Financial Officer, Controller and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company,
respectfully certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of the section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


Dated:  June 27, 2007

/s/ Robert Knoth
Robert Knoth
Chief Financial Officer, Controller and Principal Accounting Officer





                                      -48-