alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**





I,
      Yada
      Schneider, President and Chief Executive Officer of Genesis Holdings, Inc.,
      a
      Nevada corporation (the “Company”), hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





(1)  The
      Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the annual period ended December
      31, 2007 the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Date:
              March 31, 2008
            By
            */s/
              Yada Schneider*Yada
                  Schneider
                President
                  & CEO
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-7692
DARREN BROWN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus RANDALL WHITE, Correctional Officer II; WILLIAM SMITH, Warden; RICHARD LANHAM, Commissioner, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge. (CA-96-1392-JFM) Submitted: February 13, 1997 Decided: February 27, 1997 Before WIDENER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Darren Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Glenn T. Marrow, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the recordand the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Brown v. White , No. CA-96-1392-JFM (D. Md. Oct. 29, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Before the Second Division,

December 17, 1952

No. 56993.

#### Philipp Bros., Inc. v. United States,

protest 159909-K (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise consist of aluminum scrap in chief value of metal and that it is secondhand or waste or refuse, fit only to be remanufactured. Upon the agreed statement of facts, it was held that the merchandise comes within the provisions of Public Law 869, *supra,*and is properly entitled to free entry.
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of Concentrax, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ed Litwak,
President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



May 11, 2004

/s/ Ed Litwak
---------------
    Ed LItwak
    President and Chief Financial Officer
1

As noted in our earlier Order denying the defendants’ motion to dismiss the bad faith cause of

action, the issue of whether ERISA, 29 U.S.C. § 1144(a), preempts Pennsylvania’s bad faith statute, 42

Pa. C.S.A. § 8371, is unsettled in this circuit. Therefore, we shall reconsider this issue once it is resolved

by the Third Circuit.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MICHELE RICCI : CIVIL ACTION

:

:

v. : No. 02-CV-4330

:

:

AETNA, INC. d/b/a AETNA U.S. :

HEALTHCARE and AETNA LIFE :

INSURANCE COMPANY :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 30th day of October, 2003, a notice of appeal having been filed in

Barber v. UNUM Life Insurance Co. of America, No. 03-CV-3018 (E.D. Pa. Sept. 9, 2003),

from Judge Newcomer’s Order denying the defendant’s motion to dismiss the state bad

faith claim in an ERISA case, in which he relied upon his previously issued opinion in

Rosenbaum v. UNUM Life Insurance Co., No. 01-CV-6578 (E.D. Pa. Sept. 8, 2003),1 it is

ORDERED as follows:

1. All proceedings are STAYED until further order of the Court;

2. The case shall be TRANSFERRED by the Clerk of Court to the CIVIL

SUSPENSE FILE.

___________________________

TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE, J.

Case 2:02-cv-04330-TJS Document 43 Filed 10/30/2003 Page 1 of 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA 

CRAIG ALLEN RODGERS, 

Appellant, 

vS. 

THE STATE OF NEVADA, 

Respondent. 

No. 83816 

FILED 

DEC 1 3 2021 

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL 

ELIZABETH A. BROWN 

CLERK OF SUPREME COURT 

BY<%.1 

DEPEI5iY CLE tt 

This is a pro se appeal "from the ORDER denying and/or 

dismissing the petition for rehearing/reconsideration motion to modify 

ruled on the 12 day of October, 2021." Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark 

County; Susan Johnson, Judge. 

Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from an 

order denying a motion for reconsideration in a criminal matter, this court 

lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal. Phelps v. State, 111 Nev. 1021, 

1022-23, 900 P.2d 344, 344-45 (1995); Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 

792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, this court 

ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED. 

P rraguirtr1178116.14.....1". 

, J. 

Stiglich 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) I947A - 3~ 3440 
cc: Hon. Susan Johnson, District Judge 

Craig Allen Rodgers 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Clark County District Attorney 

Eighth District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

(0) i947A 2
Case No. 9,683.

#### The M. M. CALEB.

[9 Ben. 159.] 1

District Court, S. D. New York.

June, 1877.

Seaman’s Wages — Jurisdiction—Tender—Costs.

1. D. was hired as deck hand on a tug, at $30 a month, as he claimed. The tug sank at a pier but was raised again, and, after she was raised, he worked on board, in repairing her. Afterwards, filed a libel against her to recover wages for the whole time. The claimants deposited in court $24.50 to meet- his claim, besides costs, amounting, in all, to $03.82, claiming that he was only entitled to $20: *Ueld.*that D. was entitled to recover $15, for half a month’s wages.

2. The court had no jurisdiction in respect to his claim for services after the boat sank

[Cited in Tarleton v. Mallory, Case No. 13,-753.]

3. The libelant could withdraw $15 out of the $63.82 and the rest of it must be returned to the claimants, and the libellant must pay the claimant's costs.

This was a libel by Edward J. Dunn, for seaman’s wages. The libellant alleged that he was hired as deck hand on the tug, on November 18th, 1876, at $30 a month and found, that he served on board as such till November 29th, when the tug sank at a pier, and that she was raised on December 9th, when he went aboard again and served till January 13th, 1877. He claimed to recover $93.75. The owners of the tug alleged that the libellant’s wages were but $20 a month; that he was discharged when the boat sank; that, after she was raised, he did some work on board, in repairing her, &c., but not as a seaman; that of this part of his claim the court had no jurisdiction; and that there was *549but ?24.50 due him for all his services. This sum, with costs, amounting to $63.50, in all, they deposited in court.

Robertson & Robertson, for libellant.

Owen & Gray, for claimants.

1

 [Reported by Robert D. Benedict. Esq., and Benj. Lincoln Benedict, Esq., and here reprinted by permission.]

BLATCHFORD, District Judge.

The li-bellant is entitled, I think, to half a month’s wages at $30 a month. I think the sinking of the boat put an end to the contract for his services as a deck hand, and that this court has no jurisdiction in respect of the services he rendered after the boat sank and after she was raised. I, therefore award, to the libellant $15. The claimants deposited in court $24.50, to meet the claim made in this suit, exclusive of costs. As the libel-lant refused to accept that sum, I cannot award costs to the libellant. Therefore, I cannot allow the libellant or his proctors to withdraw the amount deposited for costs. The $24.50 was deposited under the protest that the court could not take cognizance of any claim for services after the vessel sank, and the costs were deposited as costs proper to go to the libellant only in case the court held him entitled to as much as $24.50 for his claim. Out of the $63.82 in court the libel-lant may withdraw $15, and he must pay the fees of the marshal and clerk. The rest of the $63.82 will be returned to the claimants, and they must have costs against the libellant
| Certification of Chief Executive Officer | Exhibit 32(a) |
|------------------------------------------|---------------|
| EastGroup Properties, Inc.               |          |

|   | By:  /s/ DAVID H. HOSTER II                                                       |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | DAVID H. HOSTER II                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
|   | Chief Executive Officer                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |
|   | February 25, 2011                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      |

----
146381-1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

LOCAL UNION NO. 626 UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF 

CARPENTERS AND JOINERS OF AMERICA PENSION 

FUND, et al. 

 Plaintiffs

 v. 

MIDDLE STATES DRYWALL, INC., et al. 

 

 Defendants 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

CIVIL ACTION NO. 

 02-CV-2761 

JOINT STIPULATION PURSUANT TO F.R.C.P. 41 (a)(1)

 It is stipulated and agreed by undersigned Counsel on behalf of the parties that this matter 

is to be Dismissed as to Defendants ALN Construction, Brenda Peterson and Greg Peterson 

ONLY. 

For Plaintiffs For Defendants 

JENNINGS SIGMOND, P.C. FLAMM, BOROFF & BACINE, PC 

BY: s/ Shelley R. Goldner BY: s/ Walter H. Flamm, Jr. whf621 

SANFORD G. ROSENTHAL (ID NO. 38991) WALTER H. FLAMM, JR. (I.D.# 16607) 

SHELLEY R. GOLDNER (ID NO.32896) Union Meeting Corporate Center 

The Penn Mutual Towers, 16th Floor 925 Harvest Drive, Suite 220 

510 Walnut Street Blue Bell, PA 19422 

Philadelphia, PA 19106-3683 (215) 239-6001 

(215) 351-0611/0644 Attorney for Defendants ALN Construction, 

Attorneys for Plaintiffs Brenda Peterson and Greg Peterson 

 

Dated: January 14, 2005 

Case 2:02-cv-02761-RBS Document 21 Filed 01/14/2005 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 1350of Chapter 63 of Title 18 Of The United States Code**

 

I, J. Patrick Spainhour, the Chief Executive Officer of The ServiceMaster Company, certify that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in such Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of The ServiceMaster Company.

 

 
|   | /s/  J. Patrick Spainhour |
|--------|---------------------------|
|   | J.  Patrick Spainhour     |
|   | August 14,  2008     |

 

----
FMEA

Kline, Kelley (GE Indust, ConsInd) 

to:

Monica Shimamura

10/01/2008 04:05 PM

Show Details

Follow Up: 

Normal Priority. 

History: This message has been replied to.

Monica,

Thanks again for all of your time yesterday on the call. Hopefully, you all felt it was worthwhile, and it was a 

good overview.

I wanted to follow up on the call on the FMEA, involving the smaller group. That would probably be Marty 

Zentner, Jeff Mellinger, and Lee Bishop on our end. We would be free tomorrow and Friday at 2:00 pm, or 

also generally free on Monday afternoon after 2:30 pm. If you could let me know what would work for you all, 

we can go ahead and get that scheduled. We will send an FMEA example in advance, and would anticipate 

the call lasting half an hour or so.

We are working on the additional questions you had posed, and will have responses to you by early next 

week at the latest. If you have any additional issues you would like to see us address in the SNAP submittal, 

we would very much appreciate receiving them by early next week as well, as we are shooting to have the 

final version submitted to you by October. 15.

Thanks so much, and please feel free to call with any questions.

Kelley

Kelley A. Kline

GE Consumer & Industrial

Counsel - Regulatory Compliance 

T 502 452-7603

F 502 452-0947

C 502 403-7840

Blank Page 1 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\jarling\Local Settings\Temp\notesB53680\~web3822.htm 4/2/2010
D *334-7603

E Kelley.Kline@ge.com

www.ge.com

Appliance Park, AP2-225

Louisville, KY 40225, USA 

This electronic message (including any attached files) is intended solely for the use of the addressee. Since 

it may contain Confidential Attorney-Client Privileged Communications and Attorney Work Product, any 

unauthorized reading, reproduction, dissemination or distribution is prohibited.

If you received this message in error, please notify the sender, contact us immediately by telephone collect at 

(502) 452-7582 and delete the message from your computer. Thank you for your cooperation.

Blank Page 2 of 2

file://C:\Documents and Settings\jarling\Local Settings\Temp\notesB53680\~web3822.htm 4/2/2010
Before the First Division,

January 12, 1944

No. 49120.

#### Protests 827076-G, etc., of Dritz Traum Co., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1479 

To amend the Agricultural Act of 2014 to improve the supplemental 

agricultural disaster assistance programs, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 29, 2017 

Mr. THUNE introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry 

A BILL 

To amend the Agricultural Act of 2014 to improve the supplemental agricultural disaster assistance programs, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SUPPLEMENTAL AGRICULTURAL DISASTER AS4 SISTANCE. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1501 of the Agricultural 

6 Act of 2014 (7 U.S.C. 9081) is amended— 

7 (1) in subsection (b)(1)— 

8 (A) in the matter preceding subparagraph 

9 (A), by striking ‘‘2012’’ and inserting ‘‘2019’’; 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1479 IS

1 (B) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘or’’ 

2 at the end; 

3 (C) in subparagraph (B), by striking the 

4 period at the end and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

5 (D) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(C) disease in livestock that has been ex7 acerbated by adverse weather described in sub8 paragraph (B)— 

9 ‘‘(i) subject to the condition that a li10 censed veterinarian shall verify that the 

11 adverse weather created conditions contrib12 uting to the livestock death; and 

13 ‘‘(ii) without regard to any manage14 ment practice, vaccination protocol, or lack 

15 of vaccination by the producer relating to 

16 the disease.’’; 

17 (2) in subsection (c)— 

18 (A) in paragraph (2), in the matter pre19 ceding subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘2012’’ 

20 and inserting ‘‘2019’’; and 

21 (B) in paragraph (3)(D)(ii)(I)— 

22 (i) by striking ‘‘at least 8 consecutive’’ 

23 and inserting the following: ‘‘not less 

24 than— 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1479 IS

1 ‘‘(aa) 4 consecutive weeks 

2 during the normal grazing period 

3 for the county, as determined by 

4 the Secretary, shall be eligible to 

5 receive assistance under this 

6 paragraph in an amount equal to 

7 1 monthly payment using the 

8 monthly payment rate deter9 mined under subparagraph (B); 

10 or 

11 ‘‘(bb) 8 consecutive’’; and 

12 (ii) in item (bb) (as so designated), by 

13 striking ‘‘1 monthly payment’’ and insert14 ing ‘‘2 monthly payments’’; and 

15 (3) in subsection (d)(1), by striking ‘‘2012’’ 

16 and inserting ‘‘2019’’. 

17 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

18 this section take effect on October 1, 2018. 

19 SEC. 2. ELIGIBILITY OF NATIONAL GRASSLANDS FOR GRAZ20 ING LEASES AND PERMITS. 

21 Section 402(a) of the Federal Land Policy and Man22 agement Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1752(a)) is amended by 

23 striking ‘‘lands within National Forests’’ and inserting 

24 ‘‘National Forest System (as defined in section 11(a) of 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
4 

•S 1479 IS

1 the Forest and Rangeland Renewable Resources Planning 

2 Act of 1974 (16 U.S.C. 1609(a)) land’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
No. 49572.

#### Protests 104702-K, etc., of Rice & Co. Corp. (Boston).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

It was stipulated that the hides are similar to those involved in *Rice*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 118, C. D. 807). Theclaimwas therefore sustained.
(C. D. 94)

#### Mexican Sinclair Petroleum Corp. *v.*United States

United States Customs Court, First Division

(Decided February 9, 1939)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn (Joseph Schwartz*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*Charles D. Lawrence,*Acting Assistant Attorney General *(Marcus Higginbotham, Jr.,*special attorney), for the defendant.

Before McClelland, Sullivan, and Bbown, Judges; McClelland, P. J., not participating

Beown, Judge:

This suit against the United States was brought at New York and there tried to recover customs duties claimed to have been illegally exacted on an article invoiced as “Cleaning and Degreas-ing Preparation.” Its dry formula is shown on the powdered sample produced at the trial as follows:

> Trisodium phosphate___ 7. 35%

> Sodium carbonate_5.80%

> Sodium silicate_.__ 8. 6%

> Impurities__ .85%

*94The collector took duty at 25 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 5, Tariff Act of 1930, reading:

> Par. 5. All chemical elements, all, chemical salts and compounds, all medicinal preparations, and all combinations arid mixtures of any of the foregoing, all the foregoing obtained naturally or artificially and not specially provided for, 25 per centum ad valorem.

The plaintiff’s principal claim is under paragraph 80 reading as follows:

> PaR. 80. Soap: Castile, 15 per centum ad valorem; toilet, 30 per centum ad valorem; all other soap and soap powder, not specially provided for, 15 per centum ad valorem.

Other claims under paragraphs 14 and 81 are not pressed or supported. The evidence shows that it is principally used to wash the inside of tanks and drums and to wash tools.

The witness said that it could be used for washing hands but did not form a lather. He claimed that it was used as soa,p; was used for cleaning.

The dictionary definitions of soap are as follows:

> *Soap.*A cleansing agent, made usually by action of alkali on fat or fat acids, and consisting of potassium salts and fat acids. (Webster’s New International Dictionary, 1936.)

> *Soap.*Any compound formed by the union of a fatty acid with a base; specifically, a substance consisting wholly or in part of a sodium or potassium salt of oleic, palmitic, or stearic acid, and used as a detergent. (Funk and Wagnalls Standard Dictionary.)

The formula as proved contains no fatty acids. Although the article is undoubtedly a cleaning powder and used as some soaps are used it does not come within the common meaning of soap. Therefore under the record presented the protest must be overruled.

Judgment will isstie accordingly. '
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the accompanying Report on Form 10-K of PG&E National
Energy Group, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2002, I, Thomas B. King,
President of PG&E National Energy Group, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:



| | (1) |  | such Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December, 2002, fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                      
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | the information contained in such Report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2002, fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
PG&E National Energy Group, Inc.

|                    |  |                          |  | 
|------------------- |  | ------------------------ |  | 
|Date: March 5, 2003 |  | /s/ Thomas B. King       |  | 
|                    |  |                          |  | 
|                    |  | Thomas B. King
President |  |