alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Before the Third Division,

February 1, 1951

No. 55203.

#### Leacock & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 125604-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the Federal Reserve bank certified dual rates of exchange for the currencies involved in the liquidation of the entries for the dates of exportation of the merchandise covered by the entries and that the circumstances relating to the liquidation of the said entries are similar in all material respects to those in Abstract 54732. In view of this stipulation and following the cited decision it was held that the currencies of the invoices covered by certain enumerated entries should have been converted in the manner directed by the judgment of this court in said Abstract 54732, in accordance with Bureau of Customs Circular Letter No. 2675, dated October 19, 1949.
No. 53468.

protest 147141-K (New York).

#### South American Minerals & Merchandise Corporation *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protest was dismissed.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this date I caused a true and correct copy of Defendants’

Motion for an Evidentiary Hearing Relative to Plaintiff’s Alleged Citizenship and

Domicile in the State of New Jersey, to be served by United States Mail, First Class

Service, properly addressed and postage prepaid, upon the following:

Anita F. Alberts, Esquire

301 South Main Street

The Atrium, Suite W-2

Doylestown, PA 18901

Attorney for Plaintiff

 S/Sidney L.Gold, Esquire-SG1387 

SIDNEY L. GOLD, ESQUIRE

Attorney for Defendant

February 3, 2005

Case 2:02-cv-04421-PBT Document 32-3 Filed 02/03/2005 Page 1 of 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

S.P.,

Respondent

v.

B.H.,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 70 WAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 12th day of June, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE WELLBUTRIN SR / ZYBAN ANTITRUST )

LITIGATION ) Master File No. 02-CV-4398

_________________________________________ )

)

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: )

ALL ACTIONS )

_________________________________________ )

ORDER

AND NOW, this _____ day of April, 2003, IT IS ORDERED that the Court shall hear

oral argument on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss on April 14, 2003 at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom

3-B, Third Floor, United States Courthouse, 601 Market Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

BY THE COURT:

_________________________

BRUCE W. KAUFFMAN, J.

Case 2:02-cv-04398-BWK Document 23 Filed 04/07/2003 Page 1 of 1
No. 49600.

#### Protest 69028-K of Goodwin Johnson (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

In view of *Quong Yuen Shing Co.*v. *United States*(31 C. C. P. A. 43, C. A. D. 247) the merchandise was held not classifiable under paragraph 5. The evidence indicated that the merchandise consists of 98 percent precipitated chalk to which 2 percent of calcium stearate has been added, the latter being added, apparently, according to one of plaintiff’s witnesses on cross-examination, in order to cause the precipitated chalk to remain in suspension in a water solution longer than otherwise. Plaintiff offered evidence to show that the principal uses of precipitated chalk were as a cheap filler, as in talcum powder and rubber goods, and as a mild abrasive, as in toothpaste, and that such were the uses of the merchandise at bar. Plaintiff cited *Mawer*v. *United States*(7 Ct.Cust.Appls. 493, T. D. 37108), *Klipstein*v. *United States*(4 id. 510, T. D. 33936), *Schaefer Alkaloid Works*v. *United States*(7 id. 128, T. D. 36455), and *Caulk*v. *United States*(T. D. 47397). The court was of opinion that while the merchandise may have been advanced in value or condition by reason of the addition thereto of calcium stearate, there has been no manufacture or change effected by such an addition into a new article and that the merchandise is still, in fact, precipitated chalk. The claim that it is dutiable under paragraph 20, as amended, was therefore sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         699,441
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       3,248,807
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                             1,955,067
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                     187,516,961
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                    188,936,408
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,667,444
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             404,606,045
<DEPOSITS>                                 171,386,362
<SHORT-TERM>                               126,595,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          5,170,548
<LONG-TERM>                                 43,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        66,853
<OTHER-SE>                                  58,454,135
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             404,606,045
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             10,430,673
<INTEREST-INVEST>                           10,445,547
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            20,876,220
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           5,842,348
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          13,983,873
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        6,892,347
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                            (44,933)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              4,437,481
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,398,217
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   3,398,217
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,177,597
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.35
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.33
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    2.45
<LOANS-NON>                                  1,024,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              1,024,000
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,691,007
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   17,176
<RECOVERIES>                                     3,427
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,677,258
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                      1,677,258
        

</TABLE>
---

CERTIFICATIONS

The undersigned, Kevin Kortje, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | the annual report on Form 20-F of Qwick Media Inc. for
      the year ended December 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Qwick Media Inc.                                                               

Dated: May 3, 2011

| | /s/
      Kevin Kortje          
| | --------------------------------
| | Kevin Kortje                    
| | Chief Financial Officer         
| | (Principal Financial Officer and
| | Principal Accounting Officer)   

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Qwick Media Inc.
and will be retained by Qwick Media Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
# C_2015363EN.01003901.xml

| 3.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 363/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 363/39

---

Action brought on 10 August 2015 — Petrov and Others v European Parliament

(Case T-452/15)

(2015/C 363/48)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Andrei Petrov (St. Petersburg, Russia), Fedor Biryukov (Moscow, Russia), Alexander Sotnichenko (St. Petersburg, Russia) (represented by: P. Richter, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Parliament

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the ban on entering the premises of the European Parliament made by the President of the European Parliament against the applicants on 16 June 2015; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the ban on entering the premises of the European Parliament made by the President of the European Parliament against the applicants on 16 June 2015;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union
  The applicants claim that they were discriminated against solely because of their nationality and in contravention of the prohibition under Article 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, since there appear to be no substantive grounds for the ban pronounced. Moreover, in the view of the applicants, their presence on the premises of the European Parliament did not pose a risk to security and could not adversely affect the Parliament’s functioning. |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union

The applicants claim that they were discriminated against solely because of their nationality and in contravention of the prohibition under Article 21 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, since there appear to be no substantive grounds for the ban pronounced. Moreover, in the view of the applicants, their presence on the premises of the European Parliament did not pose a risk to security and could not adversely affect the Parliament’s functioning.

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging misuse of power
  The applicants claim that the actions of the President of the European Parliament were manifestly purely arbitrary and are diametrically opposed to the prohibition of discrimination in the Treaties. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging misuse of power

The applicants claim that the actions of the President of the European Parliament were manifestly purely arbitrary and are diametrically opposed to the prohibition of discrimination in the Treaties.

---
# C_2017168EN.01001801.xml

| 29.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 168/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 168/18

---

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 2 March 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší soud — Czech Republic) — Criminal proceedings against Juraj Sokáč

(Case C-497/16) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Drug precursors - Regulation (EC) No 273/2004 - Article 2(a) - Definition of ‘scheduled substance’ - Exclusion of medicinal products - Directive 2001/83/EC - Article 1(2) - Definition of ‘medicinal product’ - Medicinal product containing ephedrine or pseudoephedrine - Regulation (EC) No 111/2005 - Article 2(a) - Definition of ‘scheduled substance’ - Annex - Inclusion of medicinal products containing ephedrine or pseudoephedrine - No effect on the scope of Regulation (EC) No 273/2004))

(2017/C 168/23)

Language of the case: Czech

Referring court

Referring court

Nejvyšší soud

Party to the criminal proceedings in the main proceedings

Party to the criminal proceedings in the main proceedings

Juraj Sokáč

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

‘Medicinal products’, within the meaning of Article 1(2) of Directive 2001/83/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 November 2001 on the Community code relating to medicinal products for human use, as amended by Directive 2004/27/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004, which contain ‘scheduled substances’, within the meaning of Article 2(a) of Regulation (EC) No 273/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 on drug precursors, as amended by Regulation (EU) No 1258/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 November 2013, such as ephedrine and pseudoephedrine, remain excluded from the scope of Regulation No 273/2004 following the entry into force of Regulation No 1258/2013 and Regulation (EU) No 1259/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 November 2013 amending Council Regulation (EC) No 111/2005 laying down rules for the monitoring of trade between the Union and third countries in drug precursors.

---

(1)  OJ C 22, 23.1.2017.

1

---
Part 2

SUPPLEMENT

Fiscal Year 2015 Reporting

Section V

Bulletin No. 2015-03 Draft V-141 IRC Handout December 2, 2014 

Line

No.

USSGL

Acct. USSGL Account Title Begin/

End

Debit/

Credit

Reimb 

Flag

Apport 

Cat

Auth 

Type 

Code

Avail 

Time

BEA 

Cat

Borrow 

Source

Fed/Non

Fed

Year of 

BA

PY Adj Reduction 

Type

TAS 

Status

Trans. 

Code

Fund Type Financing 

Account 

Code

Debit Credit Addl. 

Info.

1020

1020 415800 Authority Made Available From Offsetting Collection 

Balances Previously Precluded From Obligation

E D/C D/M P U X/K/N EP/ER N + -

1020 415800 Authority Made Available From Offsetting Collection 

Balances Previously Precluded From Obligation

E D/C D P U X/K/N EG N + -

1020 415800 Authority Made Available From Offsetting Collection 

Balances Previously Precluded From Obligation

E D/C M P U X/K/N ET N + -

Adjustment to unobligated balance brought forward, Oct 1 (+ or -

)

USSGL Crosswalk - Budget Program and Financing (P&F) Schedule
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 WESTERN RESERVE BANCORP, INC.
FORM 10-QSB
Quarter ended March 31, 2005 CERTIFICATION OF FINANCIAL RESULTS I, Cynthia A. Mahl, the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Western Reserve
Bancorp, Inc., hereby certify the following:  §
    This Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and§
    The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial position and results of operations of Western Reserve Bancorp, Inc. as of
and for the periods presented. /s/ Cynthia A. MahlCynthia A. MahlSenior Vice President/Chief Financial OfficerMay 16, 2005
 Page 39
EXHIBIT 10.5



                                  SAUCONY, INC.

                  Amendment No. 3 to 1993 Equity Incentive Plan


     1.   The 1993 Equity Incentive Plan, as amended (the "Plan"), be and hereby
          is amended by replacing all  references in the Plan to "Hyde  Athletic
          Industries, Inc." with "Saucony, Inc."

     2.   Section  3(b) of the Plan be and hereby is deleted in its entirety and
          replaced with the following:

          "(b) Grant of Options to Directors  and  Officers.  The selection of a
               director or an officer as a participant, the timing of the option
               grant or  award,  the  exercise  price of the  option or the sale
               price of the award and the  number of shares  for which an option
               or award may be granted  to such  director  or  officer  shall be
               determined  either  (i) by the Board of  Directors,  or (ii) by a
               committee of two or more  directors  having full authority to act
               in  the  matter,  each  member  of  which  shall  be an  "outside
               director"  within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code and a
               "non-employee  director" as defined in Rule 16b-3,  as such terms
               are interpreted from time to time."

          Adopted by the Board of Directors February 10, 1999.
          Modified by the Board of Directors March 28, 2000.
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 175-6 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 1 of 13
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 175-6 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 2 of 13
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 175-6 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 3 of 13
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 175-6 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 4 of 13
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 175-6 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 5 of 13
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 175-6 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 6 of 13
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 175-6 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 7 of 13
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 175-6 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 8 of 13
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 175-6 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 9 of 13
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 175-6 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 10 of 13
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 175-6 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 11 of 13
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 175-6 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 12 of 13
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 175-6 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 13 of 13
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1573 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1573

    To authorize the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of 
 Agriculture to place signage on Federal land along the trail known as 
       the ``American Discovery Trail'', and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 18, 2017

Mr. Coons (for himself and Mrs. Capito) introduced the following bill; 
   which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To authorize the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of 
 Agriculture to place signage on Federal land along the trail known as 
       the ``American Discovery Trail'', and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``American Discovery Trail Act of 
2017''.

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    In this Act:
            (1) Secretary concerned.--The term ``Secretary concerned'' 
        means--
                    (A) the Secretary of the Interior, with respect to 
                Federal land under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of 
                the Interior; or
                    (B) the Secretary of Agriculture, with respect to 
                Federal land under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of 
                Agriculture.
            (2) Trail.--The term ``Trail'' means the trail known as the 
        ``American Discovery Trail'', which consists of approximately 
        6,800 miles of trails extending from Cape Henlopen State Park 
        in Delaware to Point Reyes National Seashore in California, as 
        generally described in volume 2 of the National Park Service 
        feasibility study dated June 1995.

SEC. 3. SIGNAGE ALONG THE AMERICAN DISCOVERY TRAIL.

    (a) Signage Authorized.--As soon as practicable after the date on 
which signage acceptable to the Secretary concerned is donated to the 
United States for placement on Federal land at points along the Trail, 
the Secretary concerned shall place the signage on the Federal land.
    (b) No Federal Funds.--No Federal funds may be used to acquire 
signage authorized for placement under subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
# SBR 2014

# Footnotes
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of IQ Biometrix, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form  10-QSB/A  for the  period  ending  September  30,  2003 as filed  with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
Walsh,  Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                                        /s/ Michael Walsh
                                        -----------------------------
                                        Michael Walsh
                                        Chief Financial Officer



February 6, 2004
No. 54585.

#### Ali Shabbir India Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 155277-K (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

The protest was dismissed.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Walter Murphy, Appellant

No. 06-22-00116-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 5th District Court of 

Bowie County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 

19F1148-005). Memorandum Opinion 

delivered by Chief Justice Morriss, Justice 

Stevens and Justice van Cleef participating.

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find that the appeal should be dismissed 

for want of jurisdiction. Therefore, we dismiss the appeal.

We note that the appellant, Walter Murphy, has adequately indicated his inability to pay 

costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED NOVEMBER 10, 2022

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

JOSH R. MORRISS, III

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
EXHIBIT 32.02

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with the Annual Report of Wherify Wireless, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


November 15, 2005

                                                         /s/ John Davis
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         John Davis
                                                         Chief Financial Officer