alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-12


             Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                                   
                                             Twelve Months Ended          
                                    Dec.31  Dec.31  Dec.31  Dec.31  Dec.31
                                     1992    1993    1994    1995    1996 
                                            (Thousands of Dollars)
Fixed Charges, as defined:
Interest on long-term debt         $16,292  16,166  15,405  14,811  14,587
Other interest                         586     596   1,771   2,325   1,885
Interest component of rents        
  charged to operating expenses        214     183     177     227     231
Total Fixed Charges                $17,092  16,945  17,353  17,363  16,703

Earnings, as defined:
Net income                         $19,217  18,987  20,667  27,656  28,323
Income taxes                         9,698   9,464   9,188  19,453  18,133
Fixed charges                       17,092  16,945  17,353  17,363  16,703
Total Earnings                     $46,007  45,396  47,208  64,472  63,159

Ratio-Earnings to Fixed Charges      2.69x   2.68x   2.72x   3.71x   3.78x



             Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                   and Preferred & Preference Dividends
                                                    
                                             Twelve Months Ended          
                                    Dec.31  Dec.31  Dec.31  Dec.31  Dec.31
                                     1992    1993    1994    1995    1996 
                                               
                                            (Thousands of Dollars)
Fixed Charges, as defined:
Interest on long-term debt         $16,292  16,166  15,405  14,811  14,587
Other interest                         586     596   1,771   2,325   1,885
Interest component of rents        
  charged to operating expenses        214     183     177     227     231
Total Fixed Charges                $17,092  16,945  17,353  17,363  16,703
Preferred & Preference 
  Dividends, as defined (a)          4,476   4,287   3,545   4,187   4,040
Fixed Charges and Preferred &
  Preference Dividends             $21,568  21,232  20,898  21,550  20,743

Earnings, as defined:
Net income                         $19,217  18,987  20,667  27,656  28,323
Income taxes                         9,698   9,464   9,188  19,453  18,133
Fixed charges                       17,092  16,945  17,353  17,363  16,703
Total Earnings                     $46,007  45,396  47,208  64,472  63,159

Ratio-Earnings to Fixed 
  Charges and Preferred & 
  Preference Dividends               2.13x   2.14x   2.26x   2.99x   3.04x


(a) Preferred and preference dividends have been adjusted by multiplying
    the requirement by the ratio that income before income taxes bears to
    net income.  Such ratios were as follows:  151% in 1992, 150% in 1993,
    145% in 1994, 170% in 1995 and 164% in 1996.
# Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas January 27, 2020
No. 04

- 19

- 00896

- CV IN RE P.G.D, JR. et al. , From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar C ounty, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019PA00361 Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R This is an accelerated appeal of an order terminating the appellant’s parental rights , which must be disposed of by this court within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed. T EX

. R. J UD

. A DMIN

. 6.2. On January 15, 2020, t his court notified the court reporter responsible for preparing the record that the reporter’s record , which was due to be filed on January 9, 2020, wa s late

. On the same date , the court reporter filed a notice of late record requesting a fifteen

- da y extension of time to file the reporter’s record. The request is GRANTED. It is ORDERED that the reporter’s record must be filed in this appeal no later than January 24, 2020

. T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 35.3( c ). Further requests for extensions of time will be disfav ored.

_________________________________ Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court on this 27th day of January, 2020

.

__________________________________ _ MICHAEL A. CRUZ , Clerk of Court
IPAC Monthly Operational Metrics - January 2017
SUMMARY OF THE SPECIAL LINE OF CREDIT
FROM THE BANK OF ISRAEL                                              EXHIBIT 4.3




The conditions of the special line of credit that was granted to us by the Bank
of Israel were specified in the letters of the Governor of the Bank of Israel
from September 9, 2002 and September 1, 2003, and clarifications regarding those
letters were provided to us in a letter from the Supervisor of Banks dated March
4, 2004.

These principal terms (as arises from combining all the aforementioned letters)
are as follows:

o    The repayment date will be no later than August 1, 2006. The Governor may,
     in his sole discretion, demand an earlier repayment of the special line of
     credit or terminate any further utilization of the line.

o    The maximum amount of the special line of credit will decline gradually
     (from a maximum amount of NIS 2.2 billion) in accordance with a forecast
     that we provided to the Bank of Israel.

o    Subject to the terms of the special line of credit, we are allowed to use
     the special line of credit in order to fulfill our banking obligations and
     other related obligations that serve the purposes of reducing the special
     line of credit and realizing our credit portfolio, subject to our meeting
     the above forecast of the decline of the special line of credit.

o    Beginning from the date the Government decided to adopt the "Run-off" plan
     (July 29, 2003) the interest on the utilized credit will be the interest
     rate of the Bank of Israel, providing that all the other conditions are
     fulfilled, including the Government decision with respect to the date for
     completing the return of the deposits to the public and the disposal of our
     assets. Until that date of July 29, 2003, the utilized credit bore interest
     at the "Bank of Israel rate" plus 3%.

o    The Bank will be required to pay a commission at the rate of 1% (charged
     monthly) on the difference between the maximum amount of the special line
     of credit and 105% of its utilized amount.

o    The aggregate amount of outstanding loans to the public will not exceed the
     balance of such outstanding loans as of July 31, 2003 and must continue to
     decline. Any increase in the total amount of outstanding loans to the
     public will be deemed to be an unauthorized overdraw on the special line of
     credit and interest will be charged on such overdraw accordingly.

o    Limitations were set on our volume of activity with respect to the receipt
     of deposits.

o    The granting of the special credit line is subject to various conditions,
     among which is the placement of a pledge in favor of the Bank of Israel on
     all of our assets, except for those assets to be agreed upon by us and the
     Bank of Israel (the pledge was created by a debenture dated November 14,
     2002).
Petition for Exemption

Jaret Wieland

Jaret Wieland, LLC.

7544 Hosler Road

Leo, IN 46765

I, Jaret Wieland, hereby submit this petition for exemption under Section 333; FAA 

Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, Public Law 112-95 FEB. 14, 2012, Section 333.

I request this exemption in order to operate my UAV/UAS, DJI Phantom 3, in order to provide 

services for profit to include aerial photography, aerial cinematography, aerial filming and 

photography for real estate, construction firms, agricultural modeling, crop monitoring 

operations, aerial mapping, special events to include but not limited to weddings, private or 

public parties/events, business advertising, promotional events, geological surveying, and 

environmental studies.

The ability to provide these services to other local businesses and individuals in my 

community will benefit them by opening up opportunities they otherwise did not have before. 

Traditional methods of aerial photography/videography are simply not viable options for the 

average consumer as they are costly and involve greater risks to everyone involved; i.e. the 

use of larger aircraft carrying humans and flammable fuel. By utilizing the UAV/UAS the 

same results can be achieved with much safer conditions.

Prior to each flight/operation of the UAV/UAS, I will conduct a Pre-Flight Safety Inspection. 

All flights will be performed areas cleared for flight using the FAA B4UFLY Smartphone App 

(or similar) to make sure we are in authorized airspace. Flights will not take place over 

densely populated areas or private property without the owners permission. The UAV/UAS 

will only be operated within visual line of sight and will not be flown near airports or above 

400 feet. Necessary repairs will be performed by the manufacturers authorized repair 

facilities/ providers. The FAA can be confident that operations of this UAV/UAS will achieve 

at least the equivalent or greater level of safety.

The requests of this petition are similar to those of Scott Vigneault, Brian Punch, Mr. Jase 

W. Robak, Mr. Todd Thomas Drone Pics, Brandon Drivon, and Mr. Mike Lloyd Lloyd & 

Associates, all of whom have received Section 333 exemptions for comparable aircraft for 

similar operations.

The specific sections of 14 C.F.R from which I am seeking exemption are as follows:

14 C.F.R. Part 21;

14 C.F.R. 45.23(b);

14 C.F.R. 61.101(e)(4), & (5);

14 C.F.R. 61.113(a) & (b);

14 C.F.R. 61.133 (a);

14 C.F.R. 61.23(a) & (c);

14 C.F.R 91.7(a)

14 C.F.R. 91.9(b)(2);

14C.F.R. 91.109(a);

14 C.F.R. 91.119;

14 C.F.R. 91.121;

14 C.F.R. 91.151(a);

14 C.F.R. 91.203(a) & (b);
14 C.F.R. 91.405(a);

14 C.F.R. 91.407(a)(1);

14 C.F.R. 91.409(a)(2};

14 C.F.R. 91.417(a) & (b).

Please find the included Phantom 3 Quick Start Guide, Safety Guide, and Intelligent Flight 

Battery Safety Guide. 

I truly thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,

Jaret Wieland

Founder

Jaret Wieland, LLC.
No. D-80.

#### In re Disbarment of Kates.

It is ordered that Robert A. Kates, of Cleveland Heights, Ohio, be suspended from the practice of law in this Court and that a rule *954issue, returnable within 40 days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
No. 48433.

#### Protests 992928-G, etc., of Maryland Waste Co. et al. (Baltimore, etc.).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
EXHIBIT 32.1
 
 Certification Pursuant to
 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
 As Adopted Pursuant to
 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 In connection with the Quarterly Report of AXT, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Morris S. Young, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), that, to the best of my knowledge:
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 Dated: May 10, 2011
By:
/s/ MORRIS S. YOUNGMorris S. Young

Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)
Part 2

SUPPLEMENT

LineNo.

USSGLAcct. USSGL Account Title Begin/

End

Debit/

Credit

Reimb 

Flag

Apport 

Cat

Auth Type 

Code

Avail 

Time

BEA 

Cat

Borrow 

Source

Fed/No

nFed

Year of 

BA

PY Adj 

10201020 414600 Actual Repayments of Debt, Current-Year Authority E D/C B M B/P 

1020 414600 Actual Repayments of Debt, Current-Year Authority E D/C P/S D/M B/P 1020 414600 Actual Repayments of Debt, Current-Year Authority E D/C B M B/P 

10801080 414600 Actual Repayments of Debt, Current-Year 

Authority

E D/C B M B/P 

1080 414600 Actual Repayments of Debt, Current-Year Authority E D/C P/S D/M B/P 1080 414600 Actual Repayments of Debt, Current-Year 

Authority

E D/C B M B/P 

12001200 415700 Authority Made Available From Receipt or 

Appropriation Balances Previously Precluded From Obligation

E D/C P X 

14221422 414600 Actual Repayments of Debt, Current-Year Authority E D/C B M X 1422 414600 Actual Repayments of Debt, Current-Year Authority E D/C B M X 

14301430 404400 Anticipated Reductions to Borrowing Authority E D/C M 1430 404700 Anticipated Transfers to the General Fund of the 

Treasury - Current-Year Authority

E D/C B M 

1430 404700 Anticipated Transfers to the General Fund of the 

Treasury - Current-Year Authority

E D/C B M 

Anticipated borrowing authority:Anticipated reductions to current fiscal year borrowing Borrowing authority applied to repay debt (-)Appropriation

USSGL Crosswalk - SF 133: Report on Budget Execution and 

Adjustment of expired unobligated balance brought Adjustment to unobligated balance brought forward, Oct 1 

Bulletin 2015-04 Draft V-89
CERTIFICATION    Exhibit 31.1

I, Michael Offerman, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this annual report of Form 10-KSB/A of IEH Corporation;


2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual
report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;


4. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
have:

     a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused such
     disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
     ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
     including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
     within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual
     report is being prepared;

     b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
     controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
     the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end
     of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     c. Disclosed in this Report any change in the small business issuer's
     internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
     business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter that has materially effected, or is
     reasonably likely to materially effect, the small business issuer's
     internal control over financial reporting;

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officers and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal controls of internal control
over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function);

     a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
     operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are
     reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability
     to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
     employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
     internal controls over financial reporting; and

 Date: May 4, 2005
       -----------

/s/ Michael Offerman
---------------------
Michael Offerman
President




                                       14
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF EXTENDICARE HEALTH SERVICES, INC. FOR THE
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDING)
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                            2417
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   141168
<ALLOWANCES>                                     28418
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                181416
<PP&E>                                          756889
<DEPRECIATION>                                  218902
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  890220
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           141238
<BONDS>                                         424164
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                      205901
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    890220
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                690119
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   624166
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 46582
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  8576
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               25221
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (49754)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     17601
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (32153)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  (436)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (32589)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       (34)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (34)


</TABLE>
# C_2017402EN.01003402.xml

| 27.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 402/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 402/34

---

Order of the General Court of 28 September 2017 — Aristoteleio Panepistimio Thessalonikis v Commission

(Case T-207/16) (1)

1

((Action for annulment - Measures never having been adopted - Request for a declaration that there is no need to adjudicate - Request that the application be interpreted as referring to a measure other than the contested measures - Dismissal - Manifest inadmissibility))

(2017/C 402/45)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Aristoteleio Panepistimio Thessalonikis (Thessaloniki, Greece) (represented by: V. Christianos, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: S. Delaude and A. Katsimerou, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for annulment of an alleged exclusion decision taken against the applicant and of an alleged decision to register the applicant and to activate the exclusion warning against the applicant in the Early Warning System (EWS) or in the Early Detection and Exclusion System (EDES)

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

| 2. | The Commission shall bear its own costs in the main proceedings and in the application for interim measures, and shall pay two thirds of the costs of Aristoteleio Panepistimio Thessalonikis in those proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Commission shall bear its own costs in the main proceedings and in the application for interim measures, and shall pay two thirds of the costs of Aristoteleio Panepistimio Thessalonikis in those proceedings.

| 3. | Aristoteleio Panepistimio Thessalonikis shall bear one third of its own costs in those proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Aristoteleio Panepistimio Thessalonikis shall bear one third of its own costs in those proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 251,11.7.2016.

1

---
Before the Second Division,

January 5, 1944

No. 49111.

#### Protests 18572-K, etc., of Neon Type Foundry (Pittsburgh).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The weight of the testimony of the five witnesses at the hearing showed that the machines in question are typecasting machines and not typesetting machines. The protests were therefore overruled as to this claim.

Lawrence, J., did not participate in this decision.
DRAFT

Assoc.

Report

Line

No.

USSGL

Acct. USSGL Account Title

Begin/E

nd

Debit/Cr

edit

Reimb 

Flag

Apport 

Cat

Auth 

Type Code

Avail 

Time

BEA 

Cat

Borrow

Source

Fed/NonF

ed Year of BA PY Adj

Reduction 

Type

TAS 

Status

SF 133

TAS 

Status

P&F

Trans. 

Code Fund Type

Financing 

Account 

Code Debit Credit

Addl. 

Info.

S/P 1010

S/P 1010 417600 Allocation Transfers of Prior-Year Balances E C P/S F X U/E U X/K/N

EC/EG/EM/E

P/ER/ES/ET/

TR N + -

S/P 1010 419000 Transfers - Prior-Year Balances E C P/S F X U U X/K/N

EC/EG/EM/E

P/ER/ES/ET/

TR N + -

S 1010 419700 Balance Transfers-Out - Expired to Expired E C P/S X E K/N

EC/EG/EM/E

P/ER/ES/ET/

TR N + -

S 1070

S 1070 417600 Allocation Transfers of Prior-Year Balances E C P/S F X E K/N

EC/EG/EM/E

P/ER/ES/ET/

TR N + -

S 1070 419700 Balance Transfers-Out - Expired to Expired E C P/S X E K/N

EC/EG/EM/E

P/ER/ES/ET/

TR N + -

P 1950

P 1950 435500 Cancellation of Appropriation From Unavailable Receipts E D/C D/M X U/E X/K/N ES/ET N - +

P 1950 435600 Cancellation of Appropriation From Invested Balances E D/C D/M X U/E X/K/N ES/ET N - +

P 1950 435700

Cancellation of Appropriated Amounts Receivable From 

Invested Trust or Special Funds E D/C D/M X U/E X/K/N ES/ET N - +

Unobligated balance transferred to other accounts (-)

Expired unobligated balance transferred to other accounts (-)

Other balances withdrawn and returned to unappropriated receipts

Part 2 Fiscal Year 2015 Reporting

SUPPLEMENT Section V

USSGL Crosswalk - SF 133 and Schedule P

Report on Budget Execution and Budgetary Resources and Budget Program and Financing Schedule
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 99(b)


    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northland Cable Television, Inc. and
Subsidiary (the "Company") on Form 10Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form
10-Q"), I, Gary Jones, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that;

         (1) The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
         (a) or (15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
         78(d)); and

         (2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


Dated:  August 14, 2002





                                       BY:  /s/ GARY S. JONES
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Gary S. Jones
                                            (President)
No. 63045.

#### Criterion Bead & Novelty Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 58/12609 (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5(b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.