alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Before the First Division,

June 13, 1963

No. 67811.

#### Falcon Sales Company *v.*United States,

protest 59/34533-15868 (New Orleans).

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *Falcon Sales Company*and *J. J. Murphy & Co.*v. *United States*(47 Cust. Ct. 129, C.D. 2292), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

ALBERTO PINA,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 10-50404

D.C. No. 2:99-cr-01274-RSWL

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Central District of California

Ronald S.W. Lew, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted October 25, 2011** 

Before: TROTT, GOULD, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges. 

Alberto Pina appeals from the 360-month sentence imposed following his

convictions for Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations conspiracy under

18 U.S.C. § 1962(d), and being a felon in possession of a firearm under 18 U.S.C.

§ 922(g)(1). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

FILED

OCT 28 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 10-50404

Pina contends that his sentence is substantively unreasonable. Given the

district court’s factual findings, Pina’s low-end Guidelines sentence is reasonable

in light of the totality of the circumstances and the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) sentencing

factors. See Gall v. United States, 552 U.S. 38, 51 (2007); United States v.

Stoterau, 524 F.3d 988, 997 (9th Cir. 2008); U.S.S.G. § 1B1.3(a)(1)(B).

AFFIRMED.
United States Government Standard General Ledger Position/Policy Statement

Effective on October 1, 1996 Rescissions/Other Unavailable Authority Page E-1

RESCISSIONS/OTHER UNAVAILABLE AUTHORITY

1a. To record current year rescission:

4450 Unapportioned Authority - Available

4392 Rescissions - Current-Year

(Data elements needed for 4392 to distinquish between type of resource). 

1b. To close 4392 current year rescission:

4392 Rescissions - Current-Year

4201 Total Actual Resources - Collected

2. To anticipate a rescission:

4450 Unapportioned Authoirty - Available

4420 Unapportioned Authority - Pending Rescission

3a. To record a rescission which had previously been anticipated:

4420 Unapportioned Authority - Pending Rescission

4392 Rescissions - Current-Year 

or

4393 Rescissions - Prior-Year

3b. To record a rescission which had not previously been anticipated:

4450 Unapportioned Authority - Available

4392 Rescissions - Current-Year

or

4393 Rescissions - Prior-Year

4. To close 4420 Unapportioned Authority - Pending Rescission when the rescission was not

enacted into law:

4420 Unapportioned Authority - Pending Rescission

4650 Allotments - Expired Authority (expired funds)

4450 Unapportioned Authority Available (unexpired funds)
United States Government Standard General Ledger Position/Policy Statement

Effective on October 1, 1996 Rescissions/Other Unavailable Authority Page E-2

5. To close 4392 or 4393 Rescissions:

4392 Rescissions - Current-Year

or

4393 Rescissions - Prior-Year

4119 Other Appropriations Realized

6. To realize authority made unavailable pursuant to public law:

4450 Unapportioned Authority - Available

4395 Authority Unavailable Pursuant to Public Law (Temp)

or

4396 Authority Permanently Not Available Pursuant to PL

7. To close 4395 or 4396 Authority Unavailable Pursuant to PL:

4395 Authority Unavailable Pursuant to PL (Temp)

or

4396 Authority Permanently Not Available Pursuant to PL

4119 Other Appropriations Realized

(Assumes authority is permanently unavailable. If it is merely deferred to subsequent years, credit

is to 4450, Unapportioned Authority - Available).
ERNST & YOUNG	

 

 

 

 

 

	Report on Management's Assertion on Compliance

	with the Minimum Servicing Standards Set Forth in the

Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers

Report of Independent Accountants

The Audit Committee 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying report titled *Report of Management, that Midland Loan Services, Inc. (MLS), an indirectly wholly-owned subsidiary of The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc., complied with the minimum servicing; standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's *Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers (USAP) except for commercial loan and multifamily loan servicing, minimum servicing standards V.4 and VI. I., which the Mortgage Bankers Association of America has interpreted as inapplicable to such servicing during the year ended December 31, 2000. Management is responsible for MLS' compliance with those requirements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertions about MLS' compliance based on our examination. 
Our examination was made in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about MLS' compliance with those requirements and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on MLS' compliance with specified requirements.

In our opinion, management's assertion, that MLS complied with the aforementioned requirements during the year ended December 31, 2000, is fairly stated, in all material respects.

 

 

 

								Ernst & Young LLP

January 31, 2001

 **
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

DEBRA SCANDONE, : CIVIL ACTION

:

Plaintiff, :

:

v. :

:

MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, : NO. 05-4833 1

Commissioner of the :

Social Security Administration, :

:

Defendant. :

ORDER

AND NOW, on this 18 day of August, 2011, upon careful consideration of Plaintiff’s th

Complaint (ECF No. 1) and Brief and Statement of Issues in Support of Request for Review

(ECF No. 20), and the Commissioner’s response thereto (ECF No. 23), and for the reasons in the

accompanying Memorandum on Request for Review, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

1. Plaintiff’s request for review is DENIED and her Complaint is DISMISSED with

prejudice.

2. The Clerk shall mark this case CLOSED for statistical purposes.

BY THE COURT:

 /s/ Michael M. Baylson 

Michael M. Baylson, U.S.D.J.

A:\Scandone - Order.wpd

On February 12, 2007, Michael J. Astrue became the Commissioner of Social

1

Security. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(d)(1), Michael J. Astrue is substituted

for former Commissioner Jo Anne B. Barnhart as the defendant in this suit.

Case 2:05-cv-04833-MMB Document 26 Filed 08/18/11 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 31-8
**FORM 10-K CERTIFICATION**
I, Daniel G. Brudzynski, certify that:
 1.  I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of The Detroit Edison Securitization FundingLLC and other reports containing distribution information for the period covered by thisannual report;  2.  To the best of on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3.  To the best of my knowledge, the financial statements included in this report provide thefinancial information required to be provided to the trustee under the governing documents ofThe Detroit Edison Securitization Funding LLC; and  4.  The Detroit Edison Company, as Servicer under the securitization bonds, has complied with itsservicing obligations and minimum servicing standards.   s/ DANIEL G. BRUDZYNSKI Date: March 15, 2005Daniel G. Brudzynski  Controller  The Detroit Edison Securitization Funding LLC
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Report”) of I.D. Systems,
Inc. (the “Corporation”) for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Ned Mavrommatis, Chief
Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge,
that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation.




Dated: March 16,
      2009
                /s/
      Ned MavrommatisName:
      Ned MavrommatisTitle:
      Chief Financial Officer





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63
of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or
as a separate disclosure document.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the Corporation and will be retained by the
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
# C_2018032EN.01002902.xml

| 29.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 32/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/29

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 December 2017 — For Tune v EUIPO — Simplicity trade (opus AETERNATUM)

(Case T-815/16) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for registration of the EU figurative mark opus AETERNATUM - Earlier EU word mark OPUS - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)))

(2018/C 032/40)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: For Tune sp. z o.o. (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: K. Popławska, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Simplicity trade GmbH (Oelde, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 September 2016 (Case R 152/2016-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Simplicity trade and For Tune.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders For Tune sp. z o.o. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders For Tune sp. z o.o. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 14, 16.1.2017.

1

---
Page 1 of 1

IRC Handout February 10, 2021

Proposed New USSGL Account for 2022 (Will Vote in May 2021):

Account Title: Actual Repayment of Borrowing Authority Converted to Cash - Prior-Year 

Balances 

Account Number: 414202 

Normal Balance: Credit 

Definition: Amounts transferred to the General Fund of the U.S. Government by a nonexpenditure transfer of prior-year balances for unused or excess borrowing amounts to repay 

debt. The prior-year definite borrowing authority has been exercised but has not been used to 

liquidate obligations.

Justification: New USSGL account to separate prior-year from current-year.

Proposed Modifications to USSGL Account for 2022 (Will Vote in May 2021):

Account Title: Actual Repayment of Borrowing Authority Converted to Cash – Current-Year

Authority

Account Number: 414200 

Normal Balance: Credit 

Definition: Amounts transferred to the General Fund of the U.S. Government by a nonexpenditure transfer of current-year authority for unused or excess borrowing amounts to repay 

debt. The current-year borrowing authority has been exercised but has not been used to liquidate 

obligations.

Justification: Modify USSGL account to separate prior-year from current-year.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

                    The Small Business Administration publishes an interest rate called the optional “peg” rate (13 CFR 120.214) on a quarterly basis. This rate is a weighted average cost of money to the government for maturities similar to the average SBA direct loan. This rate may be used as a base rate for guaranteed fluctuating interest rate SBA loans. This rate will be 4.875 (4                    7/8                    ) percent for the January-March quarter of FY 2007.                 

Janet A. Tasker, 

Acting Associate Administrator for Financial Assistance.

 [FR Doc. E7-296 Filed 1-11-07; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 8025-01-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

 

:

JEROLD WASHINGTON, : Civil Action No. 02-4451

:

Plaintiff, : The Honorable Clifford Scott Green

:

v. :

:

NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER :

CORPORATION D/B/A AMTRAK, :

:

Defendant. :

 :

ENTRY OF APPEARANCES

Kindly enter the appearances of William J. Delany and Paul C. Evans on behalf of

Defendant National Railroad Passenger Corporation (“Amtrak”) in the above-captioned matter.

/s/ Paul C. Evans 

William J. Delany (I.D. #74864)

Paul C. Evans (I.D. #84535)

1701 Market Street

Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103

(215) 963-5000

Attorneys for Defendant

National Railroad Passenger Corporation

Date: February 4, 2004

Case 2:02-cv-04451-CG Document 27 Filed 02/04/2004 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that, on this 4th day of February, 2004, I caused to be served via U.S.

Mail a true and correct copy of the Entry of Appearance of William J. Delany and Paul C. Evans,

upon the following:

Armando A. Pandola, Esquire

400 Sterling Commerce Center

1819 JFK Blvd.

Philadelphia, PA 19103

Attorney for Plaintiff

/s/ Paul C. Evans 

Paul C. Evans

Case 2:02-cv-04451-CG Document 27 Filed 02/04/2004 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Brian R. Ervine,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of EvolvingSystems, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31,2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Qfairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results ofoperations of Evolving Systems, Inc.

 
| /s/ BRIAN R. ERVINE                                                      |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Brian R. Ervine                                                          |
| Executive Vice  President and Chief Financial and Administrative Officer |
| May 8, 2008                                                         |

 

This certificationis furnished with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent requiredby such Act, be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Such certification willnot be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under theSecurities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent thatwe specifically incorporate it by reference.

 

----
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

SOMAR SINGH,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-662

[February 6, 2020]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. 

Lucie County; Charles A. Schwab, Judge; L.T. Case No. 56-2017-CF000932 A.

Arthur Brandt of Baginski Brandt & Brandt, Attorneys at Law, Port St. 

Lucie, for appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jonathan P. Picard, 

Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CIKLIN, CONNER and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
EX-23


DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
    




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration
Statement No. 33-62644 on Form S-3 and Registration Statement No.
33-32529 on Form S-8 of Interstate Power Company of our reports
dated January 30, 1997, appearing in and incorporated by reference
in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Interstate Power Company for
the year ended December 31, 1996.



/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Deloitte & Touche LLP
Davenport, Iowa  

March 10, 1997
----

----

I Ανακοινώσεις

Επιτροπή

----

Ισοτιμίες του ευρώ (1)

22 Αυγούστου 2006

(2006/C 198/01)

1 ευρώ= 

----

(1)

Πηγή: Ισοτιμίες αναφοράς που δημοσιεύονται από την Ευρωπαϊκή Κεντρική Τράπεζα.

----

----

Πληροφορίες που διαβιβάζουν τα κράτη μέλη για τις κρατικές ενισχύσεις που χορηγούνται βάσει του κανονισμού (ΕΚ) αριθ. 70/2001 της Επιτροπής της 12ης Ιανουαρίου 2001 σχετικά με την εφαρμογή των άρθρων 87 και 88 της συνθήκης στις κρατικές ενισχύσεις προς μικρές και μεσαίες επιχειρήσεις

(2006/C 198/02)

(Κείμενο που παρουσιάζει ενδιαφέρον για τον ΕΟΧ)

----

----

Πληροφορίες που διαβιβάζουν τα κράτη μέλη για τις κρατικές ενισχύσεις που χορηγούνται βάσει του κανονισμού (ΕΚ) αριθ. 70/2001 της Επιτροπής, της 12ης Ιανουαρίου 2001 σχετικά με την εφαρμογή των άρθρων 87 και 88 της συνθήκης στις κρατικές ενισχύσεις προς μικρές και μεσαίες επιχειρήσεις

(2006/C 198/03)

(Κείμενο που παρουσιάζει ενδιαφέρον για τον ΕΟΧ)

----

----

Προηγούμενη γνωστοποίηση συγκέντρωσης

(Υπόθεση COMP/M. 4215 — Glatfelter/Crompton Assets)

(2006/C 198/04)

(Κείμενο που παρουσιάζει ενδιαφέρον για τον ΕΟΧ)

----

(1)ΕΕ L 24 της 29.1.2004 σ. 1.

----

III Πληροφορίες

Επιτροπή

----

Τροποποίηση της προκήρυξης δημοπρασίας καθορισμού της επιστροφής κατά την εξαγωγή κριθής προς ορισμένες τρίτες χώρες

(«Επίσημη Εφημερίδα» C 148 της 24ης Ιουνίου 2006)

(2006/C 198/05)

Στη σελίδα 43, στον τίτλο III «Προσφορές», το σημείο 1 αντικαθίσταται από το εξής κείμενο:

----

----

Τροποποίηση της προκήρυξης δημοπρασίας καθορισμού της επιστροφής κατά την εξαγωγή μαλακού σίτου προς ορισμένες τρίτες χώρες

(«Επίσημη Εφημερίδα» C 148 της 24ης Ιουνίου 2006)

(2006/C 198/06)

Στη σελίδα 46, στον τίτλο ΙΙI «Προσφορές», το σημείο 1 αντικαθίσταται από το εξής κείμενο:

----
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

 

PATRICK M. FOLEY ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 vs. ) 

 ) Civil Action No. 02-CV-4441 

MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT ) 

 ) 

 Defendant. ) 

 )

PRAECIPE TO MARK CASE SETTLED, DISCONTINUED AND ENDED 

TO THE CLERK OF COURT: 

 Please mark the above matter settled, discontinued and ended with prejudice. 

FRANCIS & MAILMAN, P.C. 

 BY:____________________________ 

JAMES A. FRANCIS, ESQUIRE 

MARK D. MAILMAN, ESQUIRE 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Land Title Building, 19th Floor 

100 South Broad Street 

Philadelphia, PA 19110 

(215) 735-8600 

Dated: September 26, 2003 

Case 2:02-cv-04441-BWK Document 6 Filed 09/26/2003 Page 1 of 1
# C_2018427EN.01004701.xml

| 26.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 427/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 427/47

---

Judgment of the General Court of 9 October 2018 — Mass Response Service v Commission

(Case T-885/16) (1)

(Action for annulment - Competition - Concentrations - Retail market for mobile telecommunications services and market for wholesale access and call origination in Germany - Acquisition of E-plus by Telefónica Deutschland - Decision declaring the concentration to be compatible with the internal market and the EEA Agreement - Implementation of the non-MNO component of the Final Commitments - Acts against which no action may be brought - Inadmissibility)

(2018/C 427/59)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Mass Response Service GmbH (Vienna, Austria) (represented by: J.-M. Schultze, S. Pautke and C. Ehlenz, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: N. Khan, M. Farley and C. Vollrath, acting as agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking, in particular, annulment of the alleged decisions of the Commission contained in the emails of 24 and 29 October 2016 relating to the implementation of the non-MNO remedy provided for in the Final Commitments made obligatory by Commission Decision C(2014) 4443 final of 2 July 2014 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the internal market and the EEA agreement, subject to compliance with certain commitments (Case COMP/M.7018 Telefónica Deutschland v E-plus).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action.

| 2. | Declares that there is no need to rule on the applications to intervene lodged by Telefónica Deutschland Holding AG and Drillisch AG. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Declares that there is no need to rule on the applications to intervene lodged by Telefónica Deutschland Holding AG and Drillisch AG.

| 3. | Orders Mass Response Service GmbH to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Mass Response Service GmbH to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

| 4. | Orders Telefónica Deutschland Holding to bear its own costs relating to the application to intervene. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders Telefónica Deutschland Holding to bear its own costs relating to the application to intervene.

| 5. | Orders Drillisch AG to bear its own costs relating to the application to intervene. |
| --- | --- |

5.

Orders Drillisch AG to bear its own costs relating to the application to intervene.

---

(1)  OJ C 38, 6.2.2017.

---