alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
different information. For instance, MAS

contains information on costs, details of

mining methods, and feasibility studies.

MRDS has mineralogical and geologic

data that are not contained in MAS.

Because they are both mineral-resource

databases, however, they contain some

information in common, such as location,

name(s) of sites, and commodities

present. 

Both databases are international in

scope, and both are quite large. MRDS

contains over 110,000 records, while

MAS has over 220,000. One reason that

MAS has more records is that it contains

information on smelters, mill sites, and

fossil fuel sites, as well as mineralresource sites. The USGS is working to

combine the information in both databases. This is a large undertaking that

will require some years to complete. In

the interim, information from both databases will still be available. 

How Mineral-Resource

Databases Are Used

USGS scientists use mineral data in a

variety of ways. One of the main

activities of the USGS Mineral Resources

Program is mineral-resource assessment

of Federal lands, primarily at the request

of the Bureau of Land Management

(BLM) and the U.S. Forest Service. In

order to better serve these land-managing

agencies, the USGS has conducted a

prototype mineral-resource assessment of

the conterminous United States. This

project gives the USGS a good “head

start” when asked to carry out a mineralresource assessment in a specific area. 

Figure 1. Typical product created as part of the USGS national mineral-reso

project. This map shows favorable areas for silver-rich deposits in the Grea

TRIM 

U.S. Department of the Interior

U.S. Geological Survey

USGS 

Supersedes USGS 
high priority for mitigation in Montana. 

Access to the Mineral-Resource

Databases

The databases may be accessed in several

ways. They are available on CD-ROM,

on the World Wide Web, and through

direct contact. 

The CD-ROM affords full query and

plotting functions and some GIS

(geographic information system)

capabilities. The CD-ROM can be

ordered by calling 1-888-ASK-USGS or

1-303-202-4700. It can also be ordered

online by following these directions:

1. Go to http://edcwww.cr.

usgs.gov/webglis.

2. Click on GEOLOGY.

3. Select MINERAL RESOURCE

DATA SYSTEM DATA SET.

4. Click on SEARCH.

5. Click on the ORDER box.

6. Click on any button that begins 

with ADD.

7. Click on COMPLETE ORDER

FORM.

8. Follow the instructions at the top of

the order to complete the ordering

process.

The databases can b

limited basis online 

gov/index.html.

For more specialized 

contact:

Bruce R. Lipin

U.S. Geological Sur

954 National Center

Reston, VA 20192 U

Telephone: 703-648

E-mail: blipin@usg

Figure 2. Geoenvironmental hazard potential for acidic, metal-rich drain

River basin, Montana.

TRIM
Part 2 Fiscal Year 2022 Reporting

SUPPLEMENT SECTION IV

USSGL ACCOUNT ATTRIBUTE DEFINITION REPORT

Attribute

Name 

Attribute

Short 

Name 

Attribute 

Definition Domain

System 

Characters Reference

Supplied

By 

Bureau 

Code

Bureau 

Code

Identifies the Code used to associate ATB activity to a specific 

Bureau within that Agency. Allows Agencies with TAS/ATB 

activity crossing multiple Bureaus to be able to create Bureau 

level Financial Statements within an Agency. This attribute is 

not required for monthly GTAS Bulkdata submissions. It is 

strictly for use by Agencies for their own reporting needs.

##### -

Bureau 

Code

5/A Agency Bulk File

IRC Meeting Handout April 20, 2022
No. 55190.

#### Chee Jung Wo et al. *v.*United States,

protests 88451-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The protests were dismissed.
No. 56988.

#### Foreign Products Corporation *v.*United States,

protest 186025-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

From an examination of the papers in the case the court was unable to find anything to overcome the presumption of correctness of the collector’s classification. The protest was therefore overruled.
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 2SUPPLEMENT	&"Arial,Bold"DRAFT	&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2017 ReportingSection VII

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2016-05	&"Arial,Bold"DRAFT VII CEDR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout 4/21/16
# C_2017277EN.01004401.xml

| 21.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 277/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 277/44

---

Judgment of the General Court of 28 June 2017 — Colgate-Palmolive v EUIPO (AROMASENSATIONS)

(Case T-479/16) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Application for EU figurative mark AROMASENSATIONS - Absolute ground for refusal - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2017/C 277/65)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Colgate-Palmolive Co. (New York, New York, United States) (represented by: M. Zintler and A. Stolz, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral and M. Simandlova, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 June 2016 (Case R 2482/2015-2), concerning an application for registration of the figurative sign AROMASENSATIONS as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Colgate-Palmolive Co. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Colgate-Palmolive Co. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 383, 17.10.2016.

1

---
No. 58438.

protests 202102-K, etc. (New York).

#### Fondeville & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items appearing in schedule “B,” attached to and made a part of the decision in this case, consist of china figures similar in all material respects to those passed upon in *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.*v. *United Stales*(39 C. C. P. A. 15, C. A. D. 458), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 56958.

#### J. Leo Grogan Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 145921-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of jewelry in chief value of artificial flowers the same in all material respects as that the subject of *Coro, Inc.*v. *United States*(39 C. C. P. A. 154, C. A. D. 478), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Peter Deros, certify that:

1.       I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Donini, Inc.;

2.       Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.       Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report

4.       The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5.       The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

         (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: September 27, 2005            /s/ PETER DEROS
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Peter Deros, Chief Executive Officer
                                    and Chief Accounting Officer
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

J.C., a child,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

Nos. 4D19-1375 and 4D19-1376

[February 27, 2020]

Consolidated appeals from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth 

Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Michael J. Orlando, Judge; L.T. Case 

Nos. 18-2938DL and 18-3415DL.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Patrick B. Burke, Assistant 

Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, DAMOORGIAN and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1293 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to enhance the research 

credit for domestic manufacturers. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 6, 2017 

Mr. COONS (for himself and Mr. ROBERTS) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to enhance 

the research credit for domestic manufacturers. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Invent and Manufac5 ture in America Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. ENHANCED RESEARCH CREDIT FOR DOMESTIC 

7 MANUFACTURERS. 

8 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 41 of the Internal Rev9 enue Code of 1986 is amended by adding at the end the 

10 following new subsection: 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1293 IS

1 ‘‘(i) ENHANCED CREDIT FOR DOMESTIC MANUFAC2 TURERS.— 

3 ‘‘(1) IN GENERAL.—In the case of a qualified 

4 domestic manufacturer, this section shall be ap5 plied— 

6 ‘‘(A) except as provided in subparagraph 

7 (B), by increasing the 20 percent amount in 

8 subsection (a)(1) by the bonus amount, and 

9 ‘‘(B) in the case of a qualified domestic 

10 manufacturer making an election under sub11 section (c)(5)— 

12 ‘‘(i) by increasing the 14 percent 

13 amount under subsection (c)(5)(A) by the 

14 alternative simplified bonus amount, and 

15 ‘‘(ii) by increasing the 6 percent 

16 amount under subsection (c)(5)(B)(ii) by 

17 the subsection (c)(5)(B) bonus amount. 

18 ‘‘(2) QUALIFIED DOMESTIC MANUFACTURER.— 

19 For purposes of this subsection— 

20 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—The term ‘qualified 

21 domestic manufacturer’ means a taxpayer who 

22 has domestic production gross receipts which 

23 are more than 50 percent of total gross re24 ceipts. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1293 IS

1 ‘‘(B) DOMESTIC PRODUCTION GROSS RE2 CEIPTS.—The term ‘domestic production gross 

3 receipts’ has the meaning given to such term 

4 under section 199(c)(4). 

5 ‘‘(3) BONUS AMOUNT; ALTERNATIVE SIM6 PLIFIED BONUS AMOUNT; SUBSECTION (c)(5)(B) 

7 AMOUNT.—For purposes of paragraph (1): 

‘‘If the percentage of 

total gross receipts 

which are domestic 

production gross 

receipts is: 

The 

bonus 

amount 

is the 

following 

number of 

percentage 

points: 

The 

alternative 

simplified 

bonus 

amount 

is the 

following 

number of 

percentage 

points: 

The 

subsection 

(c)(5)(B) 

bonus 

amount 

is the 

following 

number of 

percentage 

points: 

More than 50% but not 

more than 60% ............ 1 0.7 0.3

More than 60% but not 

more than 70% ............ 2 1.4 0.6

More than 70% but not 

more than 80% ............ 3 2.1 0.9

More than 80% but not 

more than 90% ............ 4 2.8 1.2

More than 90% ................ 5 3.5 1.5.’’. 

8 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendment made by 

9 this section shall apply to expenditures paid or incurred 

10 in taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
# C_2019044EN.01002401.xml

| 4.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/24

---

Judgment of the General Court of 4 December 2018 — Schneider v EUIPO

(Case T-560/16) (1)

((Civil service - Members of the temporary staff - Internal reorganisation of EUIPO’s services - Redeployment - Legal basis - Article 7 of the Staff Regulations - Interests of the service - Significant change in tasks - Equivalence of posts - Covert penalty - Misuse of powers - Right to be heard - Obligation to state reasons))

(2019/C 44/29)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Gregor Schneider (Alicante, Spain) (represented by: H. Tettenborn, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Lukošiūtė, acting as Agent, and B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU for annulment of the decision of the Executive Director of EUIPO of 2 October 2014 to redeploy the applicant from the International Cooperation and Legal Affairs Department to the Operations Department of EUIPO.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Gregor Schneider to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Gregor Schneider to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

---

(1)  C 328, 5.10.2015 (case initially registered before the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union under case number F-116/15 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1.9.2016).

---
(Reap. Dec. 10976)

#### Frank Abelman *v.*United States

Entry No. 8445.

(Decided May 10, 1965)

*John O. Ray*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Nichols, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement is before me on the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the counsel for the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court:

> (1) That the merchandise covered by this appeal for reappraisement, consists of various glass tiling which was imported from Italy at the Port of Detroit on September 27,1961, and was appraised on the basis of units per square foot, less 10% packed.

> (2) The merchandise was bulk packed and not glued or mounted on backing sheets.

> (3) That at the time of exportation of said merchandise to the United States, the prices at which such merchandise was freely sold or offered for sale in the principal markets of the country of exportation, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other expenses incidental to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, were the invoice unit values per kilo in bulk, less 5% packed.

> (4) That the said appeal for reappraisement is submitted on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find and hold that export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, 70 Stat. 943, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise involved herein and that said value is represented by the invoice unit values per kilo in bulk, less 5 percent, packed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
1

 Parties include all persons, corporations or other business entities, and insurance companies with

an interest in the case, and each entity with an interest in the case must attend the conference. In the case of

corporate or other business entities, the corporate official with ultimate settlement authority is required to attend. 

Where an insurance company is involved, a representative with ultimate settlement authority is also required to

attend. 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

LINDA HUDSON, ET AL. : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. :

:

WILBERTO GONZALEZ, ET AL. : NO. 02-4365

:

:

ORDER

A Settlement Conference in the above-captioned case will be held on February 5,

2003 at 10:30am before the Honorable Linda K. Caracappa, United States Magistrate Judge, in

Room 3042, U.S. Courthouse, 601 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19106.

The Court assumes that settlement of this case is a real possibility, and the Court

has set aside the entire day for this conference. Parties are to remain present until expressly

released by the Court.

Counsel are directed to have clients with ultimate authority to settle

physically PRESENT in the courtroom for the duration of this conference.

1

 

Counsel are further directed to complete the enclosed Settlement Conference

Summary to be faxed or mailed to Chambers on or before January 29, 2003.

BY THE COURT:

 

Hon. Linda K. Caracappa

267-299-7640/267-299-5075 Fax

Date: August 26, 2002

cc: Alan L. Frank, Esq.

 Alexander J. Palamarchuk, Esq.

 Joseph Goldberg, Esq.

Case 2:02-cv-04365-MAM Document 9 Filed 08/26/2002 Page 1 of 1
Grace

IPAC Operational Metrics for October 2019

Volume by Transaction Type
Dollar Amount] ‘% of Total Dollar Amount| ‘Number of Transactions] __% of Total Number of Transactions
Fiduciary (Investment & Borrowing) 117,046, 749,008, 806| 99.76% 14877| 13.27%
[Buy/Sell 35,855,073,095| 0.21% 95,969] 85.63%
Benefits (RITS) 5,653,331,024] 0.03%
[Check Aftermath (TRACS) 119,755,393] 0.00%
[Zero Dollar rn) 0.00%
[Grand Total - October 2019 17,088,377,168,318| 10.00%
[Grand Total - September 2019 15,100,750,011,356| 10.00%
[September to October Change 41,987,627,156,962
[Percentage Change 13.2%
[Grand Total - October 2018 17,112,034,499,707|
[Oct 2018 to Oct 2019 Change -23,657,331,390|
[Percentage Change -0.1%|
July 26, 1950

No. 54575.

#### The United Import Co. *v.*United States,

protest 126841-K.

Plaintiff’s application for rehearing granted.
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS4791 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
No. 55872.

protests 141893-K, etc. (New York).

#### Nastrix Watch Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It was stipulated that the items of merchandise in question consist of watch movements similar in all material respects to those which were the subject of *United States*v. *Helbros Watch Co. et al.*(38 C. C. P. A. 1, C. A. D. 430). Upon the agreed statement of facts and the cited authority, the-merchandise was held properly dutiable at the ba.se rate of 90 cents each as watch movements more than 1 inch but less than 1.77 inches wide under paragraph 3.67 (a) (1), as modified, *supra.*
No. 64810.

#### Warner Prins Associates *v.*United States,

protest 59/33339 (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

The protest was dismissed.
```

[Federal Register: January 21, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 13)]
[Notices]               
[Page 3455]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr21ja10-31]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

 
Environmental Management Site-Specific Advisory Board, Oak Ridge 
Reservation

AGENCY: Department of Energy.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the Environmental 
Management Site-Specific Advisory Board (EM SSAB), Oak Ridge 
Reservation. The Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 86 
Stat. 770) requires that public notice of this meeting be announced in 
the Federal Register.

DATES: Wednesday, February 10, 2010, 6 p.m.

ADDRESSES: DOE Information Center, 475 Oak Ridge Turnpike, Oak Ridge, 
Tennessee.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Patricia J. Halsey, Federal 
Coordinator, Department of Energy Oak Ridge Operations Office, P.O. Box 
2001, EM-90, Oak Ridge, TN 37831. Phone (865) 576-4025; Fax (865) 576-
2347 or e-mail: halseypj@oro.doe.gov or check the Web site at http://www.oakridge.doe.gov/em/ssab.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
    Purpose of the Board: The purpose of the Board is to make 
recommendations to DOE-EM and site management in the areas of 
environmental restoration, waste management, and related activities.
    Tentative Agenda: The main meeting presentation will be on the 
Environmental Management Program Budget and Prioritization.
    Public Participation: The EM SSAB, Oak Ridge, welcomes the 
attendance of the public at its advisory committee meetings and will 
make every effort to accommodate persons with physical disabilities or 
special needs. If you require special accommodations due to a 
disability, please contact Patricia J. Halsey at least seven days in 
advance of the meeting at the phone number listed above. Written 
statements may be filed with the Board either before or after the 
meeting. Individuals who wish to make oral statements pertaining to the 
agenda item should contact Patricia J. Halsey at the address or 
telephone number listed above. Requests must be received five days 
prior to the meeting and reasonable provision will be made to include 
the presentation in the agenda. The Deputy Designated Federal Officer 
is empowered to conduct the meeting in a fashion that will facilitate 
the orderly conduct of business. Individuals wishing to make public 
comments will be provided a maximum of five minutes to present their 
comments.
    Minutes: Minutes will be available by writing or calling Patricia 
J. Halsey at the address and phone number listed above. Minutes will 
also be available at the following Web site: http://www.oakridge.doe.gov/em/ssab/minutes.htm.

    Issued at Washington, DC on January 15, 2010.
Rachel Samuel,
Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2010-1061 Filed 1-20-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```