alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT
      31.1




CHIEF
      EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION
      302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




I,
      Timothy Neher, certify that:




1.  I
      have
      reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Wherify Wireless,
      Inc;




2.  Based
      on
      my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;




3.  Based
      on
      my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
      in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
      results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and
      for, the periods presented in this report; and




4.  The
      small
      business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
      in
      Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and
      have:




a)  Designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
      and
      procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
      information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
      during the period in which this report is being prepared;




b)  Evaluated
      the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
      of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
      by this report based on such evaluation; and




c)  Disclosed
      in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over
      financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's that
      occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (or
      the
      small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
      that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,
      the
      small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.




Date:
                February 14,2006
            /s/
                Timothy Neher
              
              Timothy
                Neher
              Chief
                Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 21**
**SUBSIDIARIES OF INCO LIMITED**
 

 

**SUBSIDIARIES OF INCO LIMITED**
     Inco Limited (the “Registrant”) has no parent. The Registrant’ssubsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 (excluding those subsidiaries whichconsidered in the aggregate as a “single subsidiary” would not constitute a“significant subsidiary” as defined under Rule 1-02 of Regulation S-X of theSecurities and Exchange Commission), the jurisdiction in which each suchsubsidiary was organized, and the percentage of voting securities owned by theimmediate parent of such subsidiary are shown in the following chart:     Inco Limited (the Registrant)    Inco United States, Inc. (Delaware)  100%International Nickel, Inc. (Delaware)  100%I.E.L. Holdings (England)  100%Inco Europe Limited (England)  100%Goro Nickel S.A. (France)  85%Monticello Capital (Barbados) Limited (Barbados)  100%Inco Asia Limited (Barbados)  100%P.T. International Nickel Indonesia Tbk (Indonesia)  61%Inco TNC Limited (Japan)  67%Voisey’s Bay Nickel Company Limited (Newfoundland and Labrador)  100%
     None of the subsidiaries listed above generally conducts business under aname other than the particular name so listed.
     All of the above named subsidiaries are included in the consolidatedfinancial statements of the Registrant for the year endedDecember 31, 2003.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

 

 

FELIX D. WHITTINGTON,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

DONALD VAUGHN, et al.,

 Defendants.

 CIVIL ACTION

 NO. 02-4346

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 20th day of February, 2004, it is ORDERED that the

attached communication dated February 15, 2004, shall be filed by the Clerk.

BY THE COURT:

_________________________________

MARVIN KATZ, S.J.

Case 2:02-cv-04346-MK Document 99 Filed 02/20/2004 Page 1 of 1
# C_2017369EN.01001201.xml

| 30.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 369/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 369/12

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 September 2017 — Viridis Pharmaceutical v EUIPO — Hecht-Pharma (Boswelan)

(Case T-276/16) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU word mark Boswelan - Declaration of revocation - Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - No genuine use of the trade mark - No proper reasons for non-use))

(2017/C 369/16)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Viridis Pharmaceutical Ltd (Tortola, British Virgin Isles) (represented by: C. Spintig, S. Pietzcker and M. Prasse, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Hanne, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Hecht-Pharma GmbH (Hollnseth, Germany) (represented by: C. Sachs and J. Sachs, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 February 2016 (Case R 2837/2014-5), relating to revocation proceedings between Hecht-Pharma and Viridis Pharmaceutical.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Viridis Pharmaceutical Ltd to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Viridis Pharmaceutical Ltd to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 251, 11.7.2016.

1

---
Certifying Officer Training Technical Guide

Solving video and audio issues 

Video Requirements 

• Flash :Adobe Flash Player 10.3 or later

• Browsers: 

o Windows: Works best with Google Chrome (latest version) and Firefox (latest 

version). If using Internet Explorer (IE)11, turn off compatibility mode. 

o Mac: Safari 7 and later, Google Chrome (latest version) 

I cannot see the lesson videos 

• Check your internet connection and make sure you meet the video requirements above.

• Make sure you have the latest version of Adobe Flash player and that is version 10.3 or 

later. 

o For instructions on how to verify if you have the latest version on Flash, please 

click here: http://isflashinstalled.com/

I cannot hear the lesson videos 

• Make sure your web browser is up to date with the more recent version. 

• If you’re using IE, follow the steps below. 

o Open IE. 

o Click on Tools and select Internet options. 

o Click on the Advanced tab. 

o Under Multimedia, place a check mark on the following options: Play sounds in 

webpages 

o Click on Apply and OK. 

I am using a screen reader 

• Use JAWS 16 and later 

• Use IE 11 and later 

• Navigate with the tab button 

• Use spacebar or enter to select on-screen objects 

I am using Internet Explorer 11 and I cannot see the buttons 

• Turn off the compatibility mode within IE. Instruction on how to do this are available 

here: https://www.howtogeek.com/128289/how-todisable-compatibility-mode-ininternet-explorer/
• The compatibility mode in IE is a feature that helps you view webpages that were 

designed for previous versions of the browser, however having it enabled can break 

newer sites that were designed for modern browsers.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

DOLORES (DEE) BARRETT, : CIVIL ACTION NO.

: 02-cv-4421

Plaintiff, :

:

v. :

:

THE GREATER HATBORO CHAMBER :

OF COMMERCE, INC., JOHN J. (BUD) :

AIKEN, and MICKEY GLANTZ, :

:

Defendants. :

ORDER

AND NOW, this day of , 2004, that upon consideration of Plaintiff’s 

Motion to Compel the Deposition of Bud Aiken and Defendants’ response in opposition thereto,

it is hereby ORDERED AND DECREED, that the Plaintiff’s Motion is DENIED and that all 

parties should attempt to schedule the aforesaid deposition for a mutually convenient date and

time other than April 1, 2004 within days of this Order. 

 

J. 

Case 2:02-cv-04421-PBT Document 13-3 Filed 03/19/2004 Page 1 of 1
----

Action brought on 11 July 2006 — Portuguese Republic v Commission

(Case T-183/06)

(2006/C 212/64)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Applicant: Portuguese Republic (Lisbon, Portugal) (represented by: L.Fernandes, Agent, C.Botelho Moniz, advogado, and E.Maia Cadete, advogado)

Defendant: Commission

Form of order sought

Pleas in law and main arguments

The subject-matter of the action is the decision of the Commission of the European Communities of 28 April 2006 entitled ‘Commission Decision 28/IV/2006 excluding from Community financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the Guarantee Section of the European Guidance and Guarantee Fund (EAGGF)’ in so far as it applies in the case of Portugal a financial correction of 100 % in the flax sector, amounting to EUR 3 135 348,71, in the context of the scheme introduced by Commission Regulation (EEC) No 1164/89 of 28 April 1989 laying down detailed rules concerning the aid for fibre flax and hemp (1).

----

(1)OJ L 121, 29.4.1989, p.4

----
No. 49095.

#### Protest 1290-K/11830 of Gustaf R. Westfeldt, Jr. (New Orleans).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

At the hearing the plaintiff testified, as well as another witness, neither of whom proved to be qualified to give testimony as to the component material of chief value. As the plaintiff failed to establish a *prima facie*case it was- held that the collector’s action had not been overcome. The protest was therefore overruled.
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, John D.Hellmann, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Qof Shoe Pavilion, Inc. 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis quarterly report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, andother financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days priorto the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and 

 

c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal controls; and 

 

6. The registrant’s othercertifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recentevaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. 

 

Date: November 12, 2003
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

TUNG MA : CIVIL ACTION

:

 v. :

:

KENNETH D. KYLER, et al. : NO. 02-4380

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of October, 2002, upon consideration of the

respondent’s motion for enlargement of time to file response (Document No. 7), it is

hereby ORDERED that:

1. The motion is GRANTED;

2. The answer to the habeas petition shall be filed on or before December 2,

2002.

BY THE COURT:

 

DIANE M. WELSH

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:02-cv-04380-PBT Document 8 Filed 10/30/2002 Page 1 of 1
Part 2 DRAFT

198

USSGL Account 

Number Begin/End Zero

488100 E 0

Edit Rule Number:

Fiscal Year 2024 Reporting

Section VII

U.S. Standard General Ledger

Data Edits - Detail Report

SUPPLEMENT

Left Side Attribute Combination Right Side Attribute Combination

USSGL 488100 Balance Check

USSGL account 488100 ending must have a credit balance at a TAS level

SZ: USSGL / Zero

Less Than Or Equal (<=)

01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 11, 12

Rule Name:

Description:

Type:

Operand:

Fatal Period:

Proposed Analytical Period:

Bulletin No. 2023-08 DRAFT VII EDR - 1 IRC Handout 4/20/23
Part 2 DRAFT

199

USSGL Account 

Number Begin/End Zero

498100 E 0

Edit Rule Number:

Fiscal Year 2024 Reporting

Section VII

U.S. Standard General Ledger

Data Edits - Detail Report

SUPPLEMENT

Left Side Attribute Combination Right Side Attribute Combination

USSGL 498100 Balance Check

USSGL account 498100 ending must have a credit balance at a TAS level

SZ: USSGL / Zero

Less Than Or Equal (<=)

01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 11, 12

Rule Name:

Description:

Type:

Operand:

Fatal Period:

Proposed Analytical Period:

Bulletin No. 2023-08 DRAFT VII EDR - 2 IRC Handout 4/20/23
Part 2 DRAFT

200

USSGL 

Account 

Number Begin/End

USSGL 

Account 

Number Begin/End

403400 E 449000 E

404400 E 459000 E

404700 E 469000 E

404800 E

405000 E

406000 E

407000 E

408000 E

412000 E

412050 E

416000 E

416500 E

416512 E

418000 E

418300 E

421000 E

421100 E

421500 E

421512 E

431000 E

438600 E

438900 E

439432 E

439502 E

439702 E

439703 E

439801 E

Left Side Attribute Combination Right Side Attribute Combination

Operand: Equal (=)

Fatal Period:

Proposed Analytical 

Period:

01,02,03,04,05,06,07,08,09,10,11,12

Rule Name: Anticipated Budgetary Resources Equals Anticipated Status of Budgetary Resources

Description: For ending balances, the sum of the anticipated budgetary resources equals the sum of the anticipated status of budgetary 

Type: SS: USSGL / USSGL

Fiscal Year 2024 Reporting

SUPPLEMENT Section VII

U.S. Standard General Ledger

Data Edits - Detail Report

Edit Rule Number:

Bulletin No. 2023-08 DRAFT VII EDR - 3 IRC Handout 4/20/23
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Berle M. Schiller 5614 United States Courthouse

 JUDGE Independence Mall West

 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106

 

 267-299-7620

 

November 26, 2002 

Re: Kevin Mitchell v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc., et al.

Docket No. 02-cv-4442

Dear Counsel:

Judge Schiller has scheduled the above-referenced case for a Rule 16 conference for

Friday, December 20, 2002 at 1:30 P.M. in his chambers, Room 5614.

Counsel are directed to obtain copies of Judge Schiller’s “Scheduling Policy Statement”

and “Conference Information Report” from the Court’s website at http:www.paed.uscourts.gov. 

You should review the Scheduling Policy Statement before completing the Conference

Information Report. Please bring the completed Conference Information Report with you to the

Rule 16 Conference.

At the close of the conference, you will receive an Order from Judge Schiller that will list

firm dates for the completion of discovery, other pretrial submissions and trial that will be set at

the conference

Very truly yours,

Patricia A. Callahan

Deputy Clerk to

Hon. Berle M. Schiller

(267)299-7621

Case 2:02-cv-04442-JF Document 18 Filed 11/26/2002 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ANNA MAE JOHNSON :

: CIVIL ACTION

:

vs. :

: NO. 02-CV-4368

UNUM LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY :

AND STEP-BY-STEP, INC. :

O R D E R

AND NOW, TO WIT: This 24th day of January, 2003, it having been reported

that the issues between the parties in the above action have been settled and upon Order of the

Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1(b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this

Court (effective January 1, 1970), it is

ORDERED that the above action is DISMISSED with prejudice, pursuant to

agreement of counsel without costs.

MICHAEL E. KUNZ, Clerk of Court

BY: 

Patricia A. Callahan 

 Deputy Clerk to

Hon. Berle M. Schiller

Civ 2 (7/95)

41(b).frm

Case 2:02-cv-04368-BMS Document 15 Filed 01/24/2003 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 99.5

                                  CERTIFICATION

                        Chase Manhattan Auto Owner Trust
                           Series 2000-A (the "Trust")

I, Keith W. Schuck, the chief financial officer of Chase Manhattan Bank USA,
National Association, the depositor of assets into the above-referenced Trust ,
certify that:

1.       I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on
         Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect
         of periods included in the year covered by this annual report, of the
         Trust;

2.       Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
         whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
         to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
         light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
         misleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual
         report;

3.       Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information
         required to be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the sale
         and servicing agreement for inclusion in these reports is included in
         these reports;

4.       Based on my knowledge and upon the annual compliance statement included
         in this annual report and required to be delivered to the trustee in
         accordance with the terms of the pooling and servicing agreement, and
         except as disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its
         obligations under the sale and servicing agreement; and

5.       These reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
         servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon
         the report provided by an independent public accountant, after
         conducting a review in compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation
         Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedure, as set forth in the
         sale and servicing agreement, that is included in this annual report.





Date:    March 30, 2004


         /s/ Keith W. Schuck
----------------------------------------------------
Name:    Keith W. Schuck
Title:   Chief Financial Officer
Company: Chase Manhattan Bank USA, National Association
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 65 Filed 10/04/2007 Page 1 of 1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

469 

KA 12-01851 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND VALENTINO, JJ. 

 

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MICHAEL A. DOBLINGER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

(APPEAL NO. 2.) 

 

THE LEGAL AID BUREAU OF BUFFALO, INC., BUFFALO (BARBARA J. DAVIES OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

FRANK A. SEDITA, III, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (DAVID A. HERATY OF

COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (M.

William Boller, A.J.), rendered August 16, 2012. The judgment

convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession

of stolen property in the fourth degree. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed. 

Same Memorandum as in People v Doblinger ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d

___ [May 2, 2014]).

Entered: May 2, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1617 

AN ACT 

To designate the checkpoint of the United States Border 

Patrol located on United States Highway 77 North in 

Sarita, Texas, as the ‘‘Javier Vega, Jr. Border Patrol 

Checkpoint’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 1617 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Javier Vega, Jr. Me3 morial Act of 2017’’. 

4 SEC. 2. FINDINGS. 

5 Congress finds the following: 

6 (1) A native of La Feria, Texas, Border Patrol 

7 Agent Javier Vega, Jr., served his country first a 

8 member of the United States Marines Corps and 

9 then proudly as a border patrol agent in the canine 

10 division with his dog, Goldie. 

11 (2) Agent Vega was assigned to the Kingsville, 

12 Texas, Border Patrol Station as a canine handler 

13 and worked primarily at the Sarita Border Patrol 

14 Checkpoint. 

15 (3) On August 3, 2014, Agent Vega was on a 

16 fishing trip with his family near Raymondville, 

17 Texas, when 2 criminal aliens attempted to rob and 

18 attack them. 

19 (4) Agent Vega was shot and killed while at20 tempting to subdue the assailants and protecting his 

21 family. 

22 (5) Agent Vega is survived by his wife, parents, 

23 3 sons, brother, sister-in-law, niece, and dog, Goldie. 

24 SEC. 3. DESIGNATION. 

25 The checkpoint of the United States Border Patrol 

26 located on United States Highway 77 North in Sarita, 
3 

†S 1617 ES

1 Texas, shall be known and designated as the ‘‘Javier Vega, 

2 Jr. Border Patrol Checkpoint’’. 

3 SEC. 4. REFERENCES. 

4 Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 

5 paper, or other record of the United States to the check6 point described in section 3 shall be deemed to be a ref7 erence to the ‘‘Javier Vega, Jr. Border Patrol Check8 point’’. 

Passed the Senate August 3, 2017. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1617 

AN ACT 

To designate the checkpoint of the United States 

Jr. Border Patrol Checkpoint’’. 77 North in Sarita, Texas, as the ‘‘Javier Vega, Border Patrol located on United States Highway
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY : CIVIL ACTION

:

 v. :

:

DAVID FORREST, et al. : NO. 02-4435

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 6th day of January, 2005, it is

Ordered that a TELEPHONE CONFERENCE regarding status of the case

will be held on Monday, January 23, 2006 at 4:00 p.m.. Chambers

will initiate the call.

ATTEST: or BY THE COURT

s/Marie O'Donnell

BY: 

 Deputy Clerk Anita B. Brody, J.

Civ 12 (9/83)

Copies via ECF on _________ to: Copies MAILED on ____________ to:

Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 155 Filed 01/09/2006 Page 1 of 1
No. 52931.

#### Pacific Liquors, Ltd. *v.*United States,

protest 119083-K (Honolulu).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained. The protest was overruled in.all other respects.