alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board

# TIME AND DATE: 

November 20, 2023 at 1:00 p.m.

# PLACE: 

77 K Street NE, Washington, DC 20002.

# STATUS: 

Closed to the public.

      ( print page 81081)    

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

Kimberly Weaver, Director, Office of External Affairs, (202) 942-1640.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Board Meeting Agenda

### Closed Session

1. Information covered under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(6).

Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b(e)(1).

Dated: November 15, 2023.

Dharmesh Vashee,

General Counsel, Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board.

[FR Doc. 2023-25640 Filed 11-20-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
# sec5_sbr_2023

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin  No. 2023-08	&"Arial,Bold"&10V SBR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"&10IRC Handout Apri 20, 2023
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          39,931
<SECURITIES>                                    32,066
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,875
<ALLOWANCES>                                       231
<INVENTORY>                                        110
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                86,362
<PP&E>                                           6,985
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,794
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 100,583
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,195
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           151
<OTHER-SE>                                      77,978
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   100,583
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                30,065
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                18,867
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   149
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  17
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 12,283
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,465
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,818
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,818
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .59
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .59
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

LAVERNE LEWIS : CIVIL ACTION

 :

v. :

 :

JO ANNE BARNHART, :

Social Security Commissioner : NO. 04-4045

ORDER

AND NOW, this 30th day of May, 2006, after careful and independent consideration of

plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment,

plaintiff’s reply, the report and recommendation of the Honorable Timothy R. Rice, United States

Magistrate Judge, plaintiff’s objections thereto, and the entire administrative record, it appearing

that:

a. The administrative law judge (“ALJ”) had substantial evidence to find that

plaintiff’s residual functional capacity (“RFC”) is sufficient to perform a range of

light work with a sit/stand option, occasional postural activity, and no exposure to

environmental extremes. Further, the ALJ considered all relevant evidence in

determining plaintiff’s RFC. Although it is true that the ALJ did not cite the

particular document noted by plaintiff (Exhibit 5F, Medical Source Statement

dated 9/3/02), the ALJ cited three times a related document prepared by Dr. Gupta

(Exhibit 6F, Internal Medicine Report of 9/4/02) that was based on the 9/3/02

evaluation.

b. The ALJ complied with SSR 00-4p because, when considered in context: (1) there

were no “apparent unresolved conflicts” between the vocational expert’s

testimony and the Dictionary of Occupational Titles about which the ALJ should

have inquired; and (2) other substantial evidence in the record supported the

ALJ’s finding beyond the vocational expert’s testimony.

c. The ALJ sufficiently accounted for plaintiff’s stress level in his assessment of

RFC by specifying the need for a simple, repetitive working environment for the

plaintiff. The credible evidence in the record suggests that such consideration was

sufficient.

d. It was unnecessary for the ALJ to re-contact the physicians who had submitted

disfavored reports because they were judged to be inconsistent with the bulk of

the evidence in the record or unsupported by fact, i.e., inadequate and not

uncertain.

e. The ALJ is entitled to deference with respect to his assessment of plaintiff’s

Case 2:04-cv-04045-NS Document 13 Filed 05/31/06 Page 1 of 2
2

credibility.

f. The ALJ had substantial reason to believe that plaintiff’s spine disease did not

qualify as a “severe impairment,” and the presence of the condition without clear

evidence of accompanying functional impairment is not sufficient. 

THEREFORE, it is ORDERED:

1. The report and recommendation (paper # 11) is APPROVED and ADOPTED.

2. Plaintiff’s objections to the report and recommendation (paper # 12) are

OVERRULED.

3. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (paper # 7) is DENIED.

4. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (paper # 8)is GRANTED.

5. The clerk is directed to mark this action CLOSED.

/s/ Norma L. Shapiro 

Norma L. Shapiro, S.J. 

Case 2:04-cv-04045-NS Document 13 Filed 05/31/06 Page 2 of 2
# C_2017038EN.01000701.xml

| 6.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/7

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunalul Specializat Mureș (Romania) lodged on 21 October 2016 — Michael Tibor Bachman v FAER IFN SA

(Case C-535/16)

(2017/C 038/09)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunalul Specializat Mureș

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Michael Tibor Bachman

Applicant:

Defendant: FAER IFN SA

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Must Article 2([b]) of Directive 93/13/EEC, (1) which defines the term ‘consumer’, be interpreted as covering also a natural person who, by means of a novation agreement, has undertaken to repay to a commercial operator, which is a professional lending institution, loans originally granted to a company for purposes inherent in that company’s business activity, that is to say, for investment in the business of the carriage of goods by road, in the case where [that] natural person has no evident link with that company but acted in that way on the basis of links, outside his trade, business or profession, with the person who controlled the company which received the original loans and also with the persons who signed contracts ancillary to the original loan contracts (contracts of guarantee, contracts providing immovable property as security/mortgages)?

1

---

(1)  Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts (OJ 1993 L 95, p. 29).

1

---
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**Certification Pursuant to**

**18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

**As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of AXT, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended September 30, 2009, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Morris S. Young,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 906”),that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirementsof section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 
| Dated:  November 9, 2009 | By:    | /s/ MORRIS S. YOUNG                                                         |
|--------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                     |   | Morris S. Young

*Chief Executive Officer*

*(Principal Executive Officer)* |

 

----
Certification of Chief Financial Officer                           Exhibit 32(b)
EastGroup Properties, Inc.

In  connection  with the  annual  report  of  EastGroup  Properties,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities  and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I, N.
Keith McKey,  Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18
U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that,
to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                                        /s/ N. KEITH MCKEY
                                        --------------------------
                                        N. KEITH MCKEY
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        February 26, 2009



                                       74
From:

Sent:

To:

Cc:

Subject:

AndersDn, Tina

MDnday, August 17, 2009 11 :23 AM

Bruce_PDlkDwsky@nps.gDv; CDpeland, SCDtt

Finley, David; BUyDk, Vanessa; Schlichtemeier, Chad

UpcDming informatiDn Dn WY SIP

Bruce and Scott,

The Wyoming 309(g) SIP will be available for an FLM 60 day review at

http://deq.state.wy.us!aqd!309(g)%20SIP%20and%20TSD.asp starting August 26, 2009. A public hearing on the SIP will

be held Dn October 27'h. If you have any trouble accessing the site Dn August 26, 2009, please contact Vanessa Buyok at

Vbuyok@wyD.govDr 307-673-9337. Public review Dfthe SIP will be annDunced at a later date per the requirements of

40 CFR 51.102

As always, if you have any questiDns, please feel free tD contact me.

Tina

Christine (Tina) Anderson

SIP and Rule Development

AQD/DEQ State of Wyoming

(307) 673-9337

E-Mail to and tram me, in connection with the transaction of public business, is subject to the Wyoming Public Records Act and may be disctosed to third parties.

1
No. 67815.

#### Audex Associates, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 62/15546 (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

Since the protest was filed more than 60 days after liquidation, it was dismissed as untimely, by virtue of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1514).
Case 2:05-cr-00401-LDD Document 70 Filed 05/09/08 Page 1 of 5
Case 2:05-cr-00401-LDD Document 70 Filed 05/09/08 Page 2 of 5
Case 2:05-cr-00401-LDD Document 70 Filed 05/09/08 Page 3 of 5
Case 2:05-cr-00401-LDD Document 70 Filed 05/09/08 Page 4 of 5
Case 2:05-cr-00401-LDD Document 70 Filed 05/09/08 Page 5 of 5
Unassociated Document


    Exhibit
10.5

    Escrow
Agreement

    


    This
Escrow Agreement is made as of June 26, 2008, among Max
Engineering LLC, a Texas limited liability company (“Purchaser”), Lincoln
Wind, LLC, a Nebraska limited liability company (“Seller”), William L.
Raftery, an individual and former owner of the Seller (“Raftery”), and James
Watts, CPA (the “Escrow Agent”).

    


    Purchaser
and Seller are parties to a certain Asset Purchase Agreement dated June 25, 2008
(the “Agreement”).  The parties hereto are executing and delivering
this Escrow Agreement pursuant to Paragraph 4.9(x) of the Agreement, and
accordingly, all definitions used in the Agreement are hereby incorporated
herein by this reference.  The parties desire the Escrow Agent to hold
and dispose of the Escrow Fund (as defined herein), and the Escrow Agent is
willing to do so on the terms and conditions herein.

    


    The parties make this Escrow Agreement
to ensure the payment in full of all penalties, fees, and interest incurred by
Lincoln Wind, LLC, for delinquent payroll taxes (the “Tax
Liability”).  Raftery agrees to satisfy the Tax Liability in full as
soon as practicable following the closing contemplated by the
Agreement.  All parties agree and acknowledge that neither Purchaser,
nor Seller, nor Seller’s sole owner, Matthew Cumberworth, has or will incur any
responsibility for the Tax Liability.

    


    Purchaser shall deliver the sum of
$43,000.00 (the “Escrow Fund”) to the Escrow Agent, on the condition that when
the Tax Liability is satisfied in full and receipt for payment of the Tax
Liability is given to the Escrow Agent, the Escrow Fund shall be released to
Raftery.

    


    Dated June 26, 2008.

     

     

     

     

    
      	Lincoln
      Wind, LLC	 	 	Max
      Engineering LLC	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	
              /s/
      MATTHEW CUMBERWORTH   

            	 	 	
              /s/
      ANDREW HIDALGO

            	 
	
              NameMatthew
      Cumberworth, Manager

            	 	 	
              Andrew
      Hidalgo, Director

            	 
	
               

            	 	 	
               

            	 


    

     

    
      
        	 	 	 	Escrow
      Agent	 
	 	 	 	 	 
	
                /s/WILLIAM
      L. RAFFERTY 

              	 	 	
                /s/
      JAMES WATTS

              	 
	
                William
      L. Raftery

              	 	 	
                James
      Watts, CPA
# attribtable

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2017-16	&"Arial,Bold"&9IV  AT - &PDRAFT	&"Arial,Bold"&10IRC Handout Dec. 5, 2017
CERTIFICATIONS




The undersigned, Ross J. Tocher, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
the annual report on Form 20-F of Qwick Media Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2012 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Qwick Media Inc.




Dated:  April 30, 2013




/s/ Ross Tocher


Ross J. Tocher


President and Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Qwick Media Inc. and will be retained by Qwick Media Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE>
                                        INGERSOLL-RAND COMPANY                       EXHIBIT 12
                         COMPUTATIONS OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES
                                     (Dollar Amounts in Millions)

                                                      Years Ended December 31,
<S>                                               <C>        <C>        <C>         <C>        <C>
Fixed charges:                                    1998       1997       1996        1995       1994
  <S>                                           <C>        <C>       <C>          <C>        <C>
  Interest expense...........................   $227.5     $138.8    $ 122.4      $ 90.0     $ 46.9
  Amortization of debt discount and expense..      7.0        2.0        1.5         0.8        0.4
  Rentals (one-third of rentals).............     25.0       25.5       22.4        21.6       18.8
  Capitalized interest.......................      4.0        3.3        4.6         3.6        3.2
  Equity-linked security charges............      19.7        --         --          --         --
Total fixed charges..........................   $283.2     $169.6     $150.9     $ 116.0     $ 69.3

Net earnings ..........................         $509.1     $380.5     $358.0      $270.3     $211.1
Add:   Minority income of majority-
         owned subsidiaries..................     54.2       17.3       18.9        14.5       15.1
       Taxes on income.......................    280.1      233.2      210.3       158.9      118.8
       Fixed charges.........................    283.2      169.6      150.9       116.0       69.3
Less:  Capitalized interest..................      4.0        3.3        4.6         3.6        3.2
       Undistributed earnings (losses) from
         less than 50% owned affiliates......     33.7       16.2      (23.1)       33.3       33.3
Earnings available for fixed charges .......  $1,088.9     $781.1     $756.6      $522.8     $377.8

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges ..........     3.84       4.61       5.01        4.51       5.46
Undistributed earnings (losses) from less
    than 50% owned affiliates:
  Equity in earnings (losses)...............    $ 37.3     $ 19.4     $ 36.4       $ 36.6     $ 36.6
    Less:  Amounts distributed..............       3.6        3.2       59.5          3.3     $  3.3
  Undistributed earnings (losses) from
    less-than 50% owned affiliates...........   $ 33.7      $16.2    $ (23.1)     $ 33.3     $ 33.3
</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.01

I, Timothy Neher, certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB of Wherify
Wireless, Inc;

      2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; and

      4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small
business issuer and have:

      a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

      b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation.


Date: November 15, 2005

                                                         /s/ Timothy Neher
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Timothy Neher
                                                         Chief Executive Officer
No. 59498.

protests 256306-K, etc. (New York).

#### Astra Trading Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issues are the same in all material respects as those the subject of *John P. Herber & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(30 Cust. Ct. 193, C. D. 1519), the protests were dismissed, and the matters were remanded to a single judge sitting in reappraisement for determination of the value of the merchandise in the manner provided by law (28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d)).
Treasury and OMB Guidance Related to Financial Statements, Budgetary 

Reporting, and USSGL Reporting

Treasury and OMB update the following guidance on an annual basis:

• TFM 2-4700

• OMB Circular A-136

• OMB Circular A-11

• USSGL TFM Supplement

These updates (excluding OMB Circular A-11) are based on lessons learned at Treasury, OMB, and the federal entities 

during the financial statement preparation process, including any audit recommendations from the audit community. As 

the timeline below demonstrates, in the current process followed by OMB and Treasury, we are reliant on the agency 

financial statements being finalized normally in November and the government-wide statements being finalized 

normally in February. Even while the Financial Report of the U.S. Government is still being finalized, Treasury and OMB 

start their work with the federal entities and audit community on drafting updated guidance for TFM 2-4700 and OMB 

Circular A-136. In the current process, Treasury and OMB have draft guidance to the agencies in the March/April 

timeframe. As a matter of practice, the goal is to publish the final guidance for both TFM 2-4700 and OMB Circular A-136 

by June 30 each year.

The similar pattern happens with OMB Circular A-11 in that OMB uses the lessons learned based on the monthly GTAS 

reporting windows and the required budgetary reporting for the President’s Budget and other budgetary (including legal)

reporting requirements. These changes are incorporated into their OMB Circular A-11 guidance during its annual update. 

Lastly, the USSGL TFM Supplement merges the above three guidance documents (TFM 2-4700, OMB Circular A-136, and 

OMB A-11) updates above into an annual publication. In addition to these external document updates that have impacts 

incorporated into the USSGL TFM Supplement, there are also several TFM Bulletins for USSGL changes, including GTAS 

edits and validations, throughout the year. Therefore, the USSGL TFM Supplement incorporates all of these changes to 

show the results of all updates to USSGLs, crosswalks, edits, validations, etc.

Ideas to Solicit Feedback from Agencies for Improvements

• Optional One Year and Required Next Year

• Legislation Changes

• System Changes

• Requested Changes by Agencies

• GTAS Proposed Analytical versus Fatal Edits

• Structure of IRC Meetings

• Structure of CRT Meetings

• Agency Review Periods

The Proposed Solution

While Treasury plans to take feedback from the FMSC, IRC, and CRT government-wide groups. Based on that feedback, we will bring 

back our proposed changes to these government-wide groups to not only our timelines but also the presentation and review periods 

given to agencies. Any feedback regarding OMB Circulars A-11 and A-136 will be forwarded to our OMB counterparts. Our goal is to 

build a structured process that works for OMB, Treasury, and federal entities. 

LEAD ∙ TRANSFORM ∙ DELIVER

7/30/2018 9/30/2018

Agency 

Financial 

Statements

President's 

Budget

Financial Report 

of the U.S. 

Government

TFM 2-

4700 OMB A-136 OMB A-11 USSGL TFM 

Supplement