~ i'u,' 

Snowy Owl Productions 

15 January 2015 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Ave S.E. 

Washington, D.C. 

4200 James Ray Drive 

Suite 161 

Grand Forks, ND 58202 

Tel: 701-738-4825 

matt@skyskopes.com 

Re: Amendment to Snowy Owl Productions, LLC Exemption No. 11752 Regulatory Docket No. 

FAA-2015-0947 to add Approval ofMoving Vehicle Operations 

Dear Sir or Madam: 

This request is Snowy Owl Productions LLC DBA SkySkopes ("SkySkopes") asking for approval 

to conduct commercial operations, filming for the television and movie industry, with a sUAS operated and 

controlled from a moving platform. The FAA has approved closed set filming from a stationary point with 

conditions which applicant accepts in their entirety. On top of those protections applicant proposes to add 

significant new safety enhancements that our outlined herein. Taken together these layers of safety 

enhancements provide not only an equivalent level of safety but an enhancement of safety over current 

operations. 

In support of this request, SkySkopes submits, on a confidential basis to 333exemptions@faa.gov, 

its sUAS Operations Manual for Filming from a Moving Vehicle (MFM). This manual sets forth a strict 

regimen to be followed prior to, during and following filming from a sUAS controlled from a moving 

platform. Current operations to obtain film from a moving vehicle present dangers associated with the 

carriage of flammable fuels, passengers and crew that are not presented with the sUAS, whether controlled 

from a stationary point or a moving platform. 

The FAA has issued grants of exemptions to operators for closed set filming. In Grants of 

Exemption Nos. 11062 to Astraeus Aerial (see Docket No. FAA-2014-0352), 11109 to Clayco, Inc. (see 

Docket No. FAA-2014-0507), 11112 to VDOS Global, LLC (see Docket No. FAA-2014-0382), and 

11213 to Aeryon Labs, Inc. (see Docket No. FAA-2014-0642), the FAA found that the enhanced safety 

achieved using an unmanned aircraft (UA) with the specifications described by the petitioner and carrying 

no passengers or crew, rather than a manned aircraft of significantly greater proportions, carrying crew in 

addition to flammable fuel, gives the FAA good cause to find that the sUAS operation enabled by those 

exemptions are in the public interest. Approval of this exemption allowing filming to be controlled from a 

moving platform, would also enhance safety and fulfill the Secretary of Transportation's (the FAA 

Administrator's) responsibilities to " ... establish requirements for the safe operation of such aircraft systems 

in the national airspace system." Section 333( c) of the Reform Act. If we can provide any additional 

information to assist your understanding or review of this document, please do not hesitate to 

contact us at 701-738-4825 or via email at matt@skyskopes.com. 

Sincerely, 

~__y-- Matt Dunlevy 

President and CEO 
~ til'\ 

Snowy Owl Productions 

The name and address of the applicant is: 

SkySkopes 

This amended exemption application expressly fulfills Congress' goal in passing Section 333(a) 

through (c) of the Reform Act. This law directs the Secretary of Transportation to consider whether certain 

unmanned aircraft systems may operate safely in the national airspace system (NAS) before completion of 

the rulemaking required under Section 332 of the Reform Act. In making this determination, the Secretary 

is required to determine which types ofUASs do not create a hazard to users of the NAS or the public or 

pose a threat to national security in light of the following: 

• The UASs size, weight, speed, and operational capability; 

• Operation of the UAS in close proximity to airports and populated areas; and 

• Operation of the UAS within visual line of sight of the operator. 

Reform Act § 333 (a). Lastly, if the Secretary determines that such vehicles "may operate safely in the 

national airspace system, the Secretary shall establish requirements for the safe operation of such aircraft 

in the national airspace system." !d. § 333(c). 

The aircraft will operate at altitudes of no more than 400 feet and only in line of sight of the PIC, 

even while in a moving vehicle. They will operate only within the areas as described in the Manual which 

has been submitted confidentially. Operations in compliance with these manuals will ensure that the sUAS 

will "not create a hazard to users of the national airspace system or the public" and that the aircraft will 

operate in compliance with the conditions set forth in this application. 

Given the small size of the sUASs involved and the restricted environment, the sterile area, within 

which they will operate, the applicant falls squarely within that zone of safety (an equivalent level of safety) 

in which Congress envisioned that the FAA must, by exemption, allow commercial operations ofUASs to 

commence immediately. Also due to the size of the UASs, the restricted areas in which the relevant sUASs 

will operate and the fact that aircraft will be flown by pilots holding at least a FAA license, approval of the 

application presents no national security issue. 

Given the clear direction in Section 333 of the Reform Act, the authority contained in the Federal 

Aviation Act, as amended; the strong equivalent level of safety surrounding the proposed operations, and 

the significant public benefit, including enhanced safety, reduction in environmental impacts, including 

reduced emissions associated with allowing battery powered UASs for these functions instead of turbine or 

gas power aircraft/rotorcraft and operations with pilots having at least a commercial pilot license, the grant 

of this requested exemption is in the public interest. Accordingly, the applicant respectfully requests that 

the FAA grant this amendment without delay. 

AIRCRAFT AND EQUIVALENT LEVEL OF SAFETY /NATIONAL SECURITY 

SkySkopes states that operating in compliance with the conditions set forth in this Manual will 

provide an equivalent level of safety for the operation of its Section 333 approved aircraft types, controlled 

from a moving platform. Conventional filming operations, filming using jet or piston power helicopters, 

operate at extremely low altitudes just feet from the subject being photographed and in extreme proximity 

to people and structures and present the risks associated with vehicles that weigh in the neighborhood of 

6,000 lbs., carrying large amounts of jet A or other fuel. In contrast, a sUAV weighing fewer than 55 lbs. 

and powered by batteries eliminates virtually all of that risk given the reduced mass and lack of combustible 

fuel carried on board the UAS. The sUAV is carried to the target area and not flown and does not carry 
\~ (,I'' 

Snowy Owl Productions 

passengers or crew. Therefore, the proposed operation will not expose participants and non-participants to 

the risks associated with manned aircraft flights. These lightweight aircraft operate at slow speeds, close 

to the ground, and in "sterile areas" that are under the control of the operator, where all participants have 

received a safety briefing and, as a result, are far safer than conventional operations conducted with larger 

manned aircraft operating in close proximity to the ground and people. 

Given the small size of the sUAVs involved, the restricted environment within which they will 

operate and the comprehensive and carefully thought out procedure set forth in the Manual, SkySkopes' 

request falls squarely within that zone of safety (an equivalent level of safety) in which Congress envisioned 

that the FAA must, by exemption, allow commercial operations of sUAVs to commence immediately, 

including allowing control of sUAS from other moving platforms. Due to the size of the sUAVs, the 

restricted areas in which they will operate, operation within line of site, its proximity to people and airports 

and the fact that they will be flown by highly qualified pilots appropriately licensed for the specific vehicles 

they will operate, approval of the application presents no national security issue and is within the criteria 

set forth by Congress in the enabling statute for approval. 

PUBLIC INTEREST 

The FAA has granted exemptions to the regulations listed on page 2 in the exemptions cited above. 

As discussed in detail for each of these regulations in the attached Appendix A, the public interest will be 

served by an exemption because, with respect to each, operation in compliance with the requested 

conditions will ensure an equivalent level of safety. As also explained at length in SkySkopes original 

Section 333 exemption request, the grant of this requested exemption is in the public interest given the clear 

direction in Section 333 of the Reform Act; the authority included in the Federal Aviation Act, as amended; 

the strong equivalent level of safety surrounding the proposed operations; and the significant public benefit 

including enhanced safety, reduction in environmental impacts, the grant of this requested exemption is in 

the public interest derived from allowing control of sUASs from moving platforms to create the wonderful 

visual effects that enthrall the movie and television audiences across the country. 

********* 

Pursuant to 14 C.F.R. Part 11, the following summary is provided for publication in the Federal 

Register, should it be determined that publication is needed: 

Applicant seeks an exemption from the following rules: 

14 C.F.R. 61.23(a) and (c) 

14 C.F.R. 61.101 (e) (4) and (5) 

14 C.F.R. 61.113 (a) 

14 C.F.R. 61.315 (a) 

14 C.P.R. 91.7 (a) 

14 C.F.R. 91.119 (c) 

14 C.F.R. 91.121 

14 C.F.R. 91.151 (a)(l) 

14 C.F.R. 91.405 (a) 

14 C.F.R. 407 (a) (1) 

14 C.F.R. 409 (a) (1) and (2) 

14 C.F.R. 417 (a) & (b) 

to operate commercially a small unmanned vehicle (55 lbs. or less) in motion picture and television 

operations and aerial data collection from other mobile vehicles. 
\~ tw' 

Snowy Owl Productions 

The operation of small UASs, weighting less than 55 lbs., conducted in the strict conditions 

outlined above, will provide an equivalent level of safety supporting the grant of the exemptions requested 

herein. These lightweight aircraft operating in a sterile controlled area, at relatively slow speeds, whether 

controlled from the ground or in a moving platform, are close to the ground, and in areas that are under the 

control of the applicant and, as a result, are far safer than conventional operations conducted with turbine 

helicopters operating in close proximity to the ground and people. 
(v~ 

\~ (II'' 

Snowy Owl Productions 

Appendix A 

AIRCRAFT AND EQUIVALENT LEVEL OF SAFETY 

The FAA has granted exemptions to the following regulations in the listed exemptions: 14 

C.F.R. 61.23(a) and ( c);l4 C.F.R. 61.101 (e) (4) and (5);14 C.F.R. 61.113 (a); 14 C.F.R. 61.315 (a);l4 

C.F.R. 91.7 (a);l4 C.F.R. 91.119 (c);l4 C.F.R. 91.121;14 C.F.R. 91.151 (a)(l);14 C.F.R. 91.405 (a);14 

C.F.R. 407 (a) (1);14 C.F.R. 409 (a) (1) and (2);14 C.F.R. 417 (a) & (b) to allow aerial data collection and 

closed set filming (See, FAA Exemptions 11309,11460, 11490 and the Exemption) 

14 C.F.R. Part 61: Private Pilot Privileges and Limitations: Pilot in Command 

Sections 61.113 (a) & (b) limit private pilots to non-commercial operations. Because the UAS will 

not carry a pilot or passengers, the proposed operations can achieve the equivalent level of safety of current 

operations by requiring the PIC operating the aircraft to hold a certificate issued by the FAA authorizing 

operation of any aircraft (ATP, Commercial, Private, Recreational or Sport). Unlike a conventional aircraft 

that carries the pilot and passengers, the sUAS is remotely controlled with no living thing on board. The 

area of operation is controlled and restricted, and all flights are planned and coordinated in advance as set 

forth in the Manual. The level of safety provided by the requirements included in the Manual exceeds that 

provided by a single individual holding a commercial pilot's certificate operating a conventional aircraft. 

The risks associated with the operation ofthe sUAS are so diminished from the level of risk associated with 

commercial operations contemplated by Part 61 when drafted, that allowing operations of the sUAS as 

requested with any certificate issued by the FAA as the PIC exceeds the present level of safety achieved by 

14 C.F.R. Part 61. The FAA has granted exemptions for private pilots to conduct similar operations in 

Exemptions 11 062, 11213, 113 60 and 1144 7. 

14 C.F.R. § 91.119: Minimum Safe Altitudes 

Section 91.119 establishes safe altitudes for operation of civil aircraft. Section 91.119 (d) allows 

helicopters to be operated at less than the minimums prescribed, provided the person operating the 

helicopter complies with any route or altitudes prescribed for helicopters by the FAA. As this exemption 

is for a sUAS that are helicopters and the exemption requests authority to operate at altitudes up to 400 

AGL an exemption may be needed to allow such operations. As set forth herein, except for the limited 

conditions stated in the Manual, the UAS will never operate at higher than 400 AGL. 

The equivalent level of safety will be achieved given the size, weight, speed ofthe UAS as well as 

the location where it is operated. No flight will be taken without the permission of the property owner, 

facility owner and local officials. Because of the advance notice to the property owner and participants all 

affected individuals will be aware of the planned flight operations as set forth in the Manual. Compared to 

flight operations with aircraft or rotorcraft weighting far more than the maximum 55lbs. proposed herein 

and the lack of flammable fuel, any risk associated with these operations is far less than those presently 

presented with conventional aircraft operating at or below 500 AGL in the aerial photography industry. In 

addition, the low-altitude operations of the sUAS will ensure separation between these small-UAS 

operations and the operations of conventional aircraft that must comply with Section 91.119. The FAA has 

granted exemptions to conduct similar operations in Exemptions 11062, 11213, 11360 and 11447. 

14 C.F.R. § 91.121: Altimeter Settings 

This regulation requires each person operating an aircraft to maintain cruising altitude by reference 

to an altimeter that is set " ... to the elevation of the departure airport or an appropriate altimeter setting 
~ fw' 

Snowy Owl Productions 

available before departure." As each sUAS model in at least one operating mode will not have a barometric 

altimeter, but instead a GPS altitude read out, an exemption will be needed. An equivalent level of safety 

will be achieved by the operator, pursuant to the Manual and Safety Check list, confirming the altitude of 

the launch site shown on the GPS altitude indicator before flight. The FAA has granted exemptions to 

conduct similar operations in Exemptions 11062, 11213, 11360 and 11447. 

14 C.F.R. § 91.151(a): Fuel Requirements for Flight in VFR Conditions 

Section 91.151 (a) prohibits an individual from beginning "a flight in an airplane under VFR 

conditions unless (considering wind and forecast weather conditions) there is enough fuel to fly to the first 

point of intended landing, and, assuming normal cruising speed - ( 1) During the day, to fly after that for at 

least 30 minutes; or (2) At night, to fly after that for at least 45 minutes." 

The battery powering the sUAS provides approximately 40 minutes of powered flight. To meet 

the 30 minute reserve requirement in 14 C.P.R.§ 91.151, sUAS flights would be limited to approximately 

10 minutes in length. Given the limitations on the UAS's proposed flight area and the location of its 

proposed operations within a predetermined area, a longer time frame for flight in daylight or night VFR 

conditions is reasonable. 

Applicant believes that an exemption from 14 C.P.R.§ 91.151(a) falls within the scope of prior 

exemptions. See Exemption 10673 (allowing Lockheed Martin Corporation to operate without compliance 

with FAR 91.151 (a)). Operating the small UAS, in a tightly controlled area where only people and property 

owners or official representatives who have signed waivers will be allowed, with less than 30 minutes of 

reserve fuel, does not engender the type of risks that Section 91.15l(a) was intended to alleviate given the 

size and speed ofthe small UAS. 

Applicant believes that an equivalent level of safety can be achieved by limiting flights to 5 minutes 

of reserve time on the batteries. This restriction would be more than adequate to return the sUAS to its 

planned landing zone from anywhere in its limited operating area. 

Similar exemptions have been granted to other operations, including Exemptions 2689F, 5745, 

10673, 10808 and Exemptions 11062, 11213, 11360 and 11447. 

14 C.F.R. Part 91: Maintenance Inspections 

These regulations require that an aircraft operator or owner "shall have that aircraft inspected as 

prescribed in subpart E of this part and shall between required inspections, except as provided in paragraph 

(c) of this section, have discrepancies repaired as prescribed in part 43 of this chapter. .. ," and others shall 

inspect or maintain the aircraft in compliance with Part 43. 

Given that these section and Part 43 apply only to aircraft with an airworthiness certificate, these 

sections will not apply to the applicant. Maintenance will be accomplished by the operator pursuant to the 

flight manual and operating handbook as referenced in the FOP attached as confidential See Exhibit 1. An 

equivalent level of safety will be achieved because these small UASs are very limited in size and will carry 

a small payload and operate only in areas for limited periods of time. If mechanical issues arise the UAS 

can land immediately and will be operating from no higher than 400 feet AGL. As provided in the FOP 

the operator will ensure that the UAS is in working order prior to initiating flight, perform required 

maintenance, and keep a log of any maintenance performed. Moreover, the operator is the person most 

familiar with the aircraft and best suited to maintain the aircraft in an airworthy condition to provide the 

equivalent level of safety. The FAA has granted exemptions for similar operations in Exemptions 11062, 

11213, 11360 and 11447.