alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 55888.

protests 155316-K and 167215-K (New York).

#### Parfums Corday, Inc., and Wiener Laces, Inc. *v.*United States,

*320Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the Federal Reserve bank certified dual rates of exchange for the currency involved in the liquidation of the entries for the dates of exportation of the merchandise covered by the entries and that the circumstances relating to the liquidation of the said entries are similar in all material respects to those in Abstract 54732. In view of this stipulation and following the cited decision it was held that the currency of the invoices should have been converted in the manner directed by the judgment of this court in said Abstract 54732, in accordance with Bureau of Customs Circular Letter No. 2675, dated October 19, 1949.
No. 60004.

#### F. C. Mackay *v.*United States,

protests 174486-K, etc. (Pembina).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of beef similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Swift & Company et al.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 212, C. D. 1655), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 61299.

protests 264585-K, etc. (New York).

#### Wm. Rand, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

The issue presented herein was decided adversely to plaintiffs’ contention in *Dale Products Corp. et al.*v. *United States*(31 Cust. Ct. 170, C. D. 1565) and *United States*v. *Astra Trading Corp.*(44 C. C. P. A. 8, C. A. D. 627). When the case was called for trial, plaintiffs requested a continuance pending trial of a new test case. The request was denied and an order of dismissal for lack of prosecution was entered. The protests were, therefore, dismissed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

__________________________________________

:

BEVERLY HARPER, :

:

Plaintiff, :

vs. : CIVIL NO. 05-4943

:

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, :

Commissioner of the :

Social Security Administration, :

:

Defendant. :

__________________________________________:

ORDER

AND NOW, this 2 day of November, 2006, after careful review and independent nd

consideration of the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment, Plaintiff’s reply brief, the

administrative record, and upon review of the Report and Recommendation of Carol Sandra Moore

Wells, U.S. Magistrate Judge, and no objections being filed thereto, it is hereby

ORDERED, that the Report and Recommendation isADOPTED and APPROVED;

it is further

ORDERED, that the Commissioner’s Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED;

it is further 

ORDERED, that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN

PART and DENIED IN PART; and it is further

ORDERED, that the matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner of the Social

Security Administration, so that the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) can conduct additional

proceedings consistent with Judge Wells’s Report and Recommendation.

Case 2:05-cv-04943-CMR Document 14 Filed 11/02/06 Page 1 of 2
Upon remand the ALJ should:

(a) consider the new evidence presented by the Plaintiff;

(b) in light of any new determinations, reassess the severity of Plaintiff’s neck and

knee impairments, from Step Two forward, giving proper consideration and appropriate weight to

the new reports and fully explaining determinations made at each step;

(c) reassess and fully explain whether or not Plaintiff’s impairments meet or equal

a Listing;

(d) reevaluate Plaintiff’s RFC;

(e) reassess her credibility; and

(f) submit a new complete and accurate hypothetical question to a vocational expert

to determine if work exists that Plaintiff can perform, notwithstanding all of her credible limitations.

The Clerk is directed to CLOSE this case.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Cynthia M. Rufe

________________________

CYNTHIA M. RUFE, J. 

Case 2:05-cv-04943-CMR Document 14 Filed 11/02/06 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.2

 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63
                     OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE


I,  Ernest  J.  Mrozek,  the  President  and  Chief  Financial  Officer  of  The
ServiceMaster  Company,  certify that (i) the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended June 30, 2005,  fully  complies with  requirements  of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the  information
contained  in such Form 10-Q fairly  presents,  in all  material  respects,  the
financial condition and results of operations of The ServiceMaster Company.




                                           /S/ ERNEST J. MROZEK
                                           ------------------------------------
                                           Ernest J. Mrozek
                                           President and Chief Financial Officer
                                           August 9, 2005


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to The ServiceMaster  Company and will be retained by The ServiceMaster
Company and  furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its staff
upon request.




                                       30
<PAGE>
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 50798 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v. MICHAEL LOUIS DEGNER, also known as Michael L. Deger, also known as Michael L. Degner , Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 6:05

- CR

- 115

- 1

Before REAVLEY, ELROD, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *
The attorney appointed to represent Michael Louis Degner has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Degner h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED April 20 , 2016 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-50798 Document: 00513473100 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/20/2016No. 15

- 50798

2 counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Acc ordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the
APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 15-50798 Document: 00513473100 Page: 2 Date Filed: 04/20/2016
----

# Virtual CD-ROM/Floppy Disk Library

      -  Home
      -  About
      -  Search
      -  List All

Gap analysis of Colorado: April 2000 final report

 System Details :

System requirements: Final report should operate readily on any modern computer with current operating software. Adobe Acrobat Reader is included free. A GIS system is needed to use GAP data.

 Notes :

Title from disc label."Final report and GIS data produced by the Colorado Division of Wildlife, University of Wyoming Mid-Continent Ecological Science Center. This CD set produced by the National Gap Analysis Office, Moscow, Idaho"--Container insert.Shipping list no.: 2003-0005-E.No longer available for sale by the Supt. of Docs.

 Subject Headings :

Biodiversity conservation -- ColoradoVegetation mapping -- Colorado

 Record Info : 

(OCoLC)ocm51515034tmp97310242

      Indiana University Catalog Information

## I 19.212/6: C 71/DISC.1

Installation Notes :

The user must have Acrobat reader 4.0, Microsoft Excel and Word. The readme file does not mention which versions are required, but I'd imagine at least '97.

        -  Download :     Browse   

## I 19.212/6: C 71/DISC.2

Installation Notes :

The user must have Acrobat reader 4.0, Microsoft Excel and Word. The readme file does not mention which versions are required, but I'd imagine at least '97.

        -  Download :     Browse   

## I 19.212/6: C 71/DISC.3

Installation Notes :

The user must have Acrobat reader 4.0, Microsoft Excel and Word. The readme file does not mention which versions are required, but I'd imagine at least '97.

        -  Download :     Browse   

Raw Mets Record

----

IU Bloomington Libraries

           Comments: libgpd@indiana.edu

  			Hosted by the IU Digital Library Program

----

        - Copyright  © 				    
2012
 				The Trustees of  Indiana University
        - Copyright Complaints
        - Libraries Privacy Policy
        - Accessibility Help
# C_2018152EN.01003101.xml

| 30.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 152/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 152/31

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 March 2018 — Kiosked v EUIPO — VRT (K)

(Case T-824/16) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Figurative mark K - Earlier Benelux figurative mark K - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)))

(2018/C 152/37)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Kiosked Oy Ab (Espoo, Finland) (represented by: L. Laaksonen, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Fischer, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: De Vlaamse Radio- en Televisieomroeporganisatie (VRT) (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: P.-Y. Thoumsin and E. Van Melkebeke, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 September 2016 (Case R 279/2016-4), relating to opposition proceedings between VRT and Kiosked.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Kiosked Oy Ab to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and by De Vlaamse Radio- en Televisieomroeporganisatie (VRT). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Kiosked Oy Ab to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and by De Vlaamse Radio- en Televisieomroeporganisatie (VRT).

---

(1)  OJ C 22, 23.1.2017.

1

---
Before the Third Division,

December 18, 1961

No. 66291.

#### United China & Glass Co. *v.*United States,

protest 60/25032 (San Francisco).

*399Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial, it was stipulated that the merchandise consists of decorated china tableware, covered by invoice No. 4 of the entry, and that it is properly dutiable as follows: Merchandise having a total value of $169, at 35 percent and 10 cents per dozen pieces; merchandise having a total value of $293, at 45 percent ad valorem and 10 cents per dozen pieces; and merchandise having a total value of $107, at 70 percent ad valorem and 10 cents per dozen pieces. The protest was sustained accordingly.
Case 2:02-cv-04417-AB Document 40 Filed 08/20/2003 Page 1 of 8
Case 2:02-cv-04417-AB Document 40 Filed 08/20/2003 Page 2 of 8
Case 2:02-cv-04417-AB Document 40 Filed 08/20/2003 Page 3 of 8
Case 2:02-cv-04417-AB Document 40 Filed 08/20/2003 Page 4 of 8
Case 2:02-cv-04417-AB Document 40 Filed 08/20/2003 Page 5 of 8
Case 2:02-cv-04417-AB Document 40 Filed 08/20/2003 Page 6 of 8
Case 2:02-cv-04417-AB Document 40 Filed 08/20/2003 Page 7 of 8
Case 2:02-cv-04417-AB Document 40 Filed 08/20/2003 Page 8 of 8
STATE OF WASH IN GTON 

### DEPARTMENT OF ECO L OGY PO /lox 4 7 600 • O lym pia , WA 985 0<1 -7 600 • 360 -407- 6000 711 for Wa shi11g lu11 Uclay Service • Per so11s IV ilh a s peech disab ilit y call ca ll 11 77- 11.13 - 634 1 April1, 2014 Mr. Dennis M. McLerran, Regional Administrator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10 1200 Sixth Avenue Seattle, W A 9810 1 RE: SIP Revision

- Infrastructure Certification for the 2008 Lead Standard Dear Mr. McLerran: The Washington State Department ofEcology (Ecology) prepared an infrastructure State lmplementaion Plan (SIP) certification that demonstrates how Washington will maintain the 2008 National Ambient Air Quality Standard for lead. As the Governor's designee for Washington's SIP, I am submitting this certification as a revision to the SIP. Ecology adopted the plan effective April1, 2014. When EPA establishes or revises a standard, the Clean Air Act requires that the state review our rules and pro grams to ensure we have the authority and means to maintain the new standard. This certification shows that the provi sions currently in Washington's SIP are adequate to maintain the 2008 lead standard. Ecology met all state and federal procedural requirements. Notice for public comment and a hearing was posted as required. The public comment period was open from February 14, 2014, to March 24, 2014. No hearing wa s requested, therefore no hearing was held
. I am enclosing one electronic, and one paper copy ofthe SIP submittal p ackage. The elech·onic copy (on enclosed CD) contains an exact duplicate of the hard copy. Attachment A of this letter includes a li st of these additional materials. If you have any questions on this submittal, please contact Laurie Hul se-Moyer at (360) 407- 6873 or laurie.hul semoyer@ecy
.wa.gov. Sincerely,

Maia D. Bellon Director

®Mr. Dennis McLerra n, Regional Admini strator April 1, 2014 Page2


### Enclosures
cc: Jeff Hunt, EPA (w/ CD) Laurie Hulse-Moyer, SIP Planner (w /o enclosures) Nancy Pritchett, Rules and Planning Unit Manager (w/o enclosures) Julie Oliver, Section Manager, Program Development (w /o enclosures) Jeff Johnston, Section Manager, Science and Engineering (w/o enclosures) Stu Clark, Program Manager, Air Quality Program (w/o enclosures) Records file (w/ enclosures)Mr. Dennis McLerran, Regional Administrator April 1, 20 14 Page 3 Attachment A -Materials on Enclosed CD
• Infrastructure SIP Certification for the 2008 Lead National Ambient Air Quality Standard (includ'ing response to comments) Ecology Publication 13-02-035 • SIP Adoption Order
EXHIBIT 31.2

Certification

I, Bonnie M. Klein, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of BCSB Bancorp, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying
officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 28, 2007



/s/ Bonnie M. KleinBonnie M. KleinSenior Vice President and Treasurer (Principal Financial
Officer)
296535-1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

COMMERCE COMMERCIAL :

LEASING, LLC, ASSIGNEE OF :

NORVERGENCE, INC. :

: CIVIL ACTION NO. 04-CV-04554(SD)

Plaintiff, :

:

v. :

:

BI-COUNTY SCALE :

ACQUISITION COMPANY, LLC :

d/b/a BI-COUNTY INDUSTRIES :

and :

IRA ROSENFELD :

:

Defendants. :

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I caused a true and correct copy of Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand

Civil Action to be served on the date indicated below via First Class Mail, postage prepaid upon

the following:

Ira Rosenfeld

Individually and as an Officer of Defendant Bi-County,

Both Appearing Pro Se

75 Kean Street

West Babylon, NY 11704

LAMM, RUBENSTONE,

TOTARO & DAVID, LLC

Date: October 26, 2004 By: ___/s/ Todd Harris Surden______________

Todd Harris Surden, Esquire, Atty I.D.

Pending; Admitted to Practice in

Pennsylvania as of October 15, 2004

Four Greenwood Square, Suite 200

Bensalem, PA 19020

(215) 638-9330

Attorneys for Plaintiff

Case 2:04-cv-04554-SD Document 5-2 Filed 10/28/04 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1

                 STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER FURNISHED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        The undersigned, Kim S. Price, is the President and Chief Executive
Officer of Citizens South Banking Corporation (the "Company").

        This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the
Company of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2005 (the "Report").

        By execution of this statement, I certify that to the best of my
knowledge:

                A)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of
                        Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
                        1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and

                B)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
                        in all material respects, the financial condition and
                        results of operations of the Company as of the dates and
                        for the periods covered by the Report.

        This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report
so that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that this
statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.

        A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Citizens South Banking Corporation and will be retained by
Citizens South Banking Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

May 5, 2005                                /s/ Kim S. Price
Dated                                      -------------------------------------
                                           Kim S. Price
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICERPURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

I, Thaddeus Dupper,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Quarterly Report of EvolvingSystems, Inc. on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31,2008 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-Qfairly presents in all material respects the financial condition and results ofoperations of Evolving Systems, Inc.

 
| /s/ THADDEUS DUPPER                    |   |
|----------------------------------------|--------|
| Thaddeus Dupper                        |
| President and Chief  Executive Officer |
| May 8, 2008                       |

 

This certificationis furnished with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent requiredby such Act, be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Such certification willnot be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under theSecurities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extentthat we specifically incorporate it by reference.

 

----
No. 50928.

#### Protests 42421-K, etc., of Walter G. Berger & Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
# C_2016326EN.01001601.xml

| 5.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/16

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Navarra (Spain) lodged on 27 June 2016 — Instituto de Religiosas Oblatas del Santísimo Redentor v Joaquín Taberna Carvajal

(Case C-352/16)

(2016/C 326/27)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Referring court

Audiencia Provincial de Navarra

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Instituto de Religiosas Oblatas del Santísimo Redentor

Appellant:

Respondent: Joaquín Taberna Carvajal

Respondent:

Question referred

Question referred

Is Royal Decree 1373/2003 compatible with Article 4(3) [TEU] and Article 101 TFEU, given that, even though that legal provision was enacted by the State, the courts may not review whether, in the light of the circumstances of the case, the amount of the tariff is excessive, this being a limitation of judicial review which, regardless of the importance and quality of the services, might constitute a restriction of free competition?

---