alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Championship Auto Racing Teams, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10- Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Thomas L. Carter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Thomas L. Carter

Thomas L. Carter
Chief Financial Officer
August 13, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Championship Auto Racing Teams, Inc. and will be retained by
Championship Auto Racing Teams, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
**Exhibit 12.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Michael Diekmann, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Allianz Aktiengesellschaft; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) [Omitted in accordance with the guidance of SEC release No. 33-8238]; 

 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; 

 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by theannual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal controlover financial reporting. 

 

Date: ****April 6, 2006
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 8 (Friday, January 12, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 1535]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-297]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION

FAI-2007-N01


Federal Acquisition Institute/Defense Acquisition University 
Vendor Meeting

AGENCY: Office of the Chief Acquisition Officer, GSA

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Acquisition Institute (FAI) and the Defense 
Acquisition University (DAU) will hold a vendor meeting to provide 
information on shared initiatives and activities. FAI will describe 
plans and requirements for training related services under the 
Acquisition Workforce Training Fund (AWTF).
    FAI and DAU work together to address many of the acquisition 
workforce training needs of the Federal government. Partnering with DAU 
enables FAI to build upon existing DAU training, develop governmentwide 
curriculum, and promote a cohesive and agile workforce. At the vendor 
meeting, DAU will present information on recent contracting curriculum 
changes. FAI will discuss how the curriculum changes impact the federal 
acquisition workforce.
    WHO SHOULD ATTEND? Training developers, vendors with Commercial-
Off-The-Shelf (COTS) training products, vendors with capabilities 
related to the full Instructional System Design (ISD) methodologies, 
and acquisition training experts.
    The meeting will be held January 24, 2007 from 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 
p.m., GSA Auditorium located at 1800 F Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 
Register by e-mail: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#8de0ecffe4ecd2e5e8ffe3ece3e9e8f7cdfeffeca3eee2e0"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="c7aaa6b5aea698afa2b5a9a6a9a3a2bd87b4b5a6e9a4a8aa">[email protected]</span></a>, or telphone (703) 284-
6988.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:  Ms. Maria Hernandez, by telephone at 
703-284-6988 or by e-mail at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ee838f9c878fb1868b9c808f808a8b94ae9d9c8fc08d8183"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="640905160d053b0c01160a050a00011e241716054a070b09">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: January 8, 2007.
Rachael M. Lerum,
Procurement Analyst, Office of National & Regional Acquisition 
Development.
[FR Doc. E7-297 Filed 1-11-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6820-61-S


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>   1
                                   EXHIBIT 11
                          Flagstar Capital Corporation
                      Computation of Net Earnings per Share


Net earnings for earnings per share are computed by subtracting from the
applicable earnings the dividend requirements on preferred stock to arrive at
earnings available to common stock and dividing this amount by the weighted
average number of common stock outstanding during the period.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                          For the Quarter                      For the Period
                                                     Ended September 30, 1998             Ended September 30, 1998
                                                  --------------------------------     -------------------------------
                                                                   (In thousands, except share data)
<S>                                               <C>                                  <C>
Net Earnings                                                        $  1,865                        $  4,298
Less: preferred stock dividends                                        1,222                           2,927
                                                  --------------------------           ---------------------
Net income available to common stock                                $    643                        $  1,371

Average common shares outstanding                                  1,000,000                         774,858

Net earnings per share - basic                                        $ 0.64                          $ 1.77

Net earnings per share - diluted                                      $ 0.64                          $ 1.77
</TABLE>
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: June 16, 2016 521895 

________________________________

In the Matter of ISAIAH GADSDEN,

Petitioner,

v

ELIZABETH O'MEARA, as MEMORANDUM AND JUDGMENT

Superintendent of Gouvernuer

Correctional Facility, 

et al.,

Respondents.

________________________________

Calendar Date: May 3, 2015

Before: Peters, P.J., Lahtinen, Egan Jr., Devine and Clark, JJ.

__________

Isaiah Gadsden, Gouverneur, petitioner pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Marcus J.

Mastracco of counsel), for respondent. 

__________

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this

Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in St. Lawrence

County) to review a determination of respondent Superintendent of

Gouverneur Correctional Facility finding petitioner guilty of

violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Peters, P.J., Lahtinen, Egan Jr., Devine and Clark, JJ.,

concur.

Determination confirmed. No opinion.
-2- 521895 

ADJUDGED that the determination is confirmed, without

costs, and petition dismissed.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
Case 2:02-cv-04440-AB Document 48-5 Filed 02/17/2004 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:02-cv-04440-AB Document 48-5 Filed 02/17/2004 Page 2 of 2
Doc#: 1335053 v1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

PETER KEENAN :

Plaintiff :

v. :

:

UNUM PROVIDENT CORPORATION : Civil Action No. 02-CV-4420

Successor-In-Interest to PAUL REVERE :

LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY and :

JOSEPH P. REILLY INSURANCE AGENCY :

Defendants :

RESPONSE OF DEFENDANT, THE PAUL REVERE LIFE INSURACNE

COMPANY, TO THE CROSS-CLAIM OF DEFENDANT,

JOSEPH P. REILLY INSURANCE AGENCY

1. The averments in this paragraph do not require a response.

2. Denied. The averments stated in the corresponding paragraph state conclusions of law to

which no responsive pleading is required. It is specifically denied that defendant, the Paul Revere Life

Insurance Company, is liable to the plaintiff on any allegation in the Complaint and/or liable over to the codefendant, Joseph P. Reilly Insurance Agency pursuant to its cross-claim.

WHEREFORE, answering defendant, the Paul Revere Life Insurance Company respectfully

request that judgment be entered in its favor and against all parties, together with appropriate costs and

fees.

Respectfully submitted,

WHITE AND WILLIAMS LLP

By: ___________________________________

ANDREW F. SUSKO, ESQUIRE

KEVIN C. COTTONE, ESQUIRE

Attorney I.D. Nos. 35664/72775

1800 One Liberty Place

Philadelphia, PA 19103-7395

(215) 864-6228/7108

Case 2:02-cv-04420-AB Document 9 Filed 09/13/2002 Page 1 of 2
Doc#: 1335053 v1

Attorneys for Defendant,

The Paul Revere Life Insurance Company

Dated: September 12, 2002 of America 

Case 2:02-cv-04420-AB Document 9 Filed 09/13/2002 Page 2 of 2
No. 61789.

#### D. C. Andrews & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 310433-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
Exhibit 32
                                                                      ----------

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Extended Systems Incorporated on Form
10-Q/A for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Charles W. Jepson, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Extended
     Systems Incorporated.


/s/ CHARLES W. JEPSON
------------------------------
Charles W. Jepson
Chief Executive Officer
January 26, 2005
<PAGE>

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Extended Systems Incorporated on Form
10-Q/A for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Valerie A. Heusinkveld, Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Extended
     Systems Incorporated.


/s/ VALERIE A. HEUSINKVELD
------------------------------
Valerie A. Heusinkveld
Chief Financial Officer
January 26, 2005
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 2SUPPLEMENT &"Arial,Regular"	&"Arial,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2021 ReportingSection VII &"Arial,Regular" 

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2021-07	&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000DRAFT&K000000 VII ESR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout 12/3/20
#### Brantly *vs.*Mayo, trustee.

Where distress warrants were issued on behalf of C. M. Mayo, as trustee, against one Brantly, it was error, on the trial of the issue made thereunder, to exclude evidence of Brantly and his wife to the effect that Brantly was not the tenant of C. M. Mayo, but held under his wife, who rented the premises from Zach. Mayo. The evidence was excluded on the ground that Zach. Mayo was dead, but he was not a party to the actions; and whether or not he had been trustee does not appear.

July 12, 1888.

Witness. Evidence. Before Judge Bower. Dougherty superior court. October term, 1887.

Reported in the decision.

*679. H. Morgan and C. B. Wooten, for plaintiff in error.

D. H. Pope '& Son, by Harrison & Peeples, *contra.*

Blandford, Justice.

The parties are the same in both of these cases, and they involve the same question. Upon the trial of each, Brantly was offered as a witness for the purpose of .testifying that his wife rented the premises from Zach. Mayo, who was dead, and that he himself did not rent the premises from C. M. Mayo, the plaintiff in the court below. His wife was also offered as a witness to the same effect. The court excluded this testimony from the consideration of the j ury. In one of the cases a part of the testimony was admitted, but the whole of it was afterwards excluded by the court in his charge to the jury.

We think the court erred in excluding this testimony. The ground upon which the testimony was excluded was that Zach. Mayo was dead. But Zach. Mayo was not a party to either of these actions. And the testimony was offered for the purpose of showing that Brantly was not the tenant of the plaintiff, but that he held under his wife, who was the tenant of another person, to-wit, Zach. Mayo, the deceased. C. M. Mayo is a party as trustee; whether Zach. Mayo was trustee or not, does not appear from the record. What effect this testimony would have had if the jury had been allowed to consider it, we are unable to say; but it was pertinent and admissible evidence, and the court erred in rejecting it.

Judgment reversed.
Page 1 of 2 IRC Handout 02/15/2024

FY 2024 Scenario Updates

Scenario Date originally 

published

Tentative release 

date of draft 

version

Status Update

Appropriation Transfers

(Previous Name)

Non-Expenditure Transfers 

(New Name)

1997 April 2024 Fiscal Service and OMB have been having 

regular meetings. When finalized this will 

be a 7-part scenario with several 

subsections. Parts I through IV are

complete, as IRC has reviewed and GLAB 

has taken comments and updated as 

necessary. Parts V through VII are being 

worked on.

Transfer of Prior Year 

Balances

2000 N/A Assigned but work has not yet begun.

Congressional Deferral 2004 N/A Assigned but work has not yet begun.

Leases – RTU (Budgetary 

Capital)

2002 based on 

SFFAS 5/6, 2023 

based on SFFAS 

54

4/13/23

12/14/23 (revised 

version)

Minor cleanup – No changes to the actual 

USSGL’s/posting logic. Clerical changes, 

such as labeling of transactions, will be 

made. Also a few new transactions will be 

published in the USSGL supplement and the 

tc # will be added to the scenario.

Leases – RTU (Budgetary 

Operating no cancellation)

2002 based on 

SFFAS 5/6, 2023 

based on SFFAS 

54

4/13/23

12/14/23 (revised 

version)

Minor cleanup – No changes to the actual 

USSGL’s/posting logic. Clerical changes, 

such as labeling of transactions, will be 

made. Also a few new transactions will be 

published in the USSGL supplement and the 

tc # will be added to the scenario.

Leases – RTU (Budgetary 

Operating with 

cancellation)

2002 based on 

SFFAS 5/6, 2023 

based on SFFAS 

54

4/13/23

12/14/23 (revised 

version)

Minor cleanup – No changes to the actual 

USSGL’s/posting logic. Clerical changes, 

such as labeling of transactions, will be 

made. Also a few new transactions will be 

published in the USSGL supplement and the 

tc # will be added to the scenario.

Foreign Military Sales N/A N/A GLAB has worked extensively with DoD to 

assist in formulating the FMS Scenario. 

There are several outstanding questions 

regarding FHOT/CIHO. GLAB, OMB, DoD, 

and several other branches at Fiscal 

continue to meet and discuss remaining 

topics

Year-End Accrual Scenario N/A April 2024 Research, development, and analysis has 

begun. Several sets of transactions have 

been completed in draft status.

Transfers – Foreign 

Assistance Act

N/A April 2024 Research, development, and analysis has 

begun.

Rescissions/Reductions 

Scenario

Various scenarios 

exist currently. 

May 2024 Research, development, and analysis has 

begun. Several sets of transactions have 

been completed in draft status.
Page 2 of 2 IRC Handout 02/15/2024

Repayable Advances 

Scenario

2016 May 2024 Research, development, and analysis has 

begun.

Specialized Accounting Scenarios

The U.S. Standard General Ledger - USSGL Implementation Guidance (treasury.gov)

If you have a specialized situation that you think there should be an “official” published scenario, please 

reach out to USSGLteam@fiscal.treasury.gov.
# Federal Aviation Administration



# Memorandum

Subject: Ex Parte Communication Report
Docket # : FAA-2015- 1 621

Date: March 14
, 2016

Place of contact: The Boeing Company

, Everett
, Washington Type of contact: Meeting

FAA Contactffitle: W. Michael Reyer
, Aero s pace E ngineer

On March 14
, 20 1 6, Mr. Michael Reyer
, a Federa l Aviation Administration (FAA) aerospace engineer working on the part 23 rulemaking activ ity, att e nded a s ubcommittee me eting of the Part 25 Aviation Ru lemaking Advisory Committee (ARAC). The subcommittee is tasked with structural rotorburst requirements for Part 25 transport catego ry airplanes. During this meeting

, an industry representative briefly presented the proposed § 23.405(d) wh ich addres ses structural rotorburst requirements for small airplanes. A brief discussion followed among the industry representati ves , during which industry recommended th at the word i ng in p roposed § 23.405(d) be changed to be similar to the wording in curr e nt § 23.903(b )(1 ). This i s becaus e current 

### § 23.903(b)(l) language may be more alleviating when compared to the proposed§ 23.405(d)

, in that it a llows a n appl icant to ' minimize ' the hazards due to rotorburst.

Attendees at the ARAC subcommittee meeting included:

Fede ral Aviation Administration Micha e l Reyer Greg Edward s Michae l Goerlick Larry llcewic z Rusty Jones Patrick Safarian Walter Sippe l Foreign Airworth i ness Authorities Pedro Caldeira ANAC (Brazil) Richard Minter EASA (European Union) Mauri z io Mo l inari Transport Canada Jacki Yu Tra n sport Canada Manufacturers: Richard Kawaguchi Boe ing Steven Chisholm Boeing Kevin Donahue Boeing D iana Elting Boeing Mike Dostert Boeing Michae l Gruber Boeing2 Don J ense n Boeing Wayne Lugg Boeing David Polland Boeing John Ostic Boeing Rupert Whee le r Boein g Sean H arper Boe i ng Mark Fart hing Boe in g Rob ert Bige li s Boe ing Marc Bozzo lo Airbus Anto in e Pilon Airbus Alain Santgerma Airbus J ohn Van Do ese laar Airbus A l ex Vinitsky Bombardier Salamon Harava n Bombardier Luiz Perin E mbraer Antonio Barbosa Embraer Kevin J o ne s Gu l fstre am Ralph Sykes Lockheed Martin D av id Ne l son Textron Airl ine s Phil Ashwell Br i t i s h Airways Pirn Hogenes Royal Dutc h Airl ines Kazuki S hi mi z u Japan Airl in es Thorsten Koch Deut sche Lufthan sa Mike Matth ews De lta A irlin es J oe Moses United Airline s Phil Y annaccone American Airlines Shin ichi Yoshizaki A ll Nippon A ir ways Andrew Ga ll ag he r U nited Parcel Serv i ce Dou g Jury De lta A irl ines Hid eaki Mori saki J apan A irlines L am Nguyen American Airli nes Steven Rife Federal Ex pre ss Victor Gasior Federal Ex pr ess Mark Yerger Federal Express Ethan Bradford Lynden Air Cargo Jo e Freese ABX Vinnie P loubi s Southwest Airli nes

ael R e er 

# w y Ae rospace E ngi nee r
# Bulletin No. 2022-04

&"Arial,Bold"&12U.S. Standard General LedgerSummary of Changes	

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2022-04	&"Arial,Bold" &P	&"Arial,Bold"December 2021

# Additional Information

&"Arial,Bold"&12U.S. Standard General LedgerSummary of Changes	

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2022-04	&"Arial,Bold" &P	&"Arial,Bold"December 2021
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 89 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 1 of 12
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 89 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 2 of 12
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 89 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 3 of 12
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 89 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 4 of 12
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 89 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 5 of 12
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 89 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 6 of 12
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 89 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 7 of 12
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 89 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 8 of 12
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 89 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 9 of 12
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 89 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 10 of 12
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 89 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 11 of 12
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 89 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 12 of 12