alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1438 Enrolled Bill (ENR)]

        S.1438

                     One Hundred Fifteenth Congress

                                 of the

                        United States of America

                          AT THE SECOND SESSION

         Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday,
           the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen

                                 An Act

 
To redesignate the Jefferson National Expansion Memorial in the State of 
             Missouri as the ``Gateway Arch National Park''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
    This Act may be cited as the ``Gateway Arch National Park 
Designation Act''.
SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF GATEWAY ARCH NATIONAL PARK.
    (a) Redesignation.--The Jefferson National Expansion Memorial 
established under the Act of May 17, 1954 (16 U.S.C. 450jj et seq.), 
shall be known and designated as the ``Gateway Arch National Park''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the Jefferson National 
Expansion Memorial shall be considered to be a reference to the 
``Gateway Arch National Park''.

                               Speaker of the House of Representatives.

                            Vice President of the United States and    
                                               President of the Senate.
```
----

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case No. COMP/M.4325 — BC Partners/Buziol/Fashion Box Group)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(2006/C 196/07)

(Text with EEA relevance)

----

(1)OJ L 24, 29.1.2004 p. 1

(2)OJ C 56, 05.3.2005 p. 32

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 7920-006]

                    1. On October 13, 2023, Tridam Energy LLC filed a notification of the transfer for the 150-kilowatt Waterloom Falls Hydroelectric Project No. 7920 from Tridam Energy LLC to Madko Hydro LLC. The exemption from licensing was originally issued on March 11, 1985.[1]                                          The project is located on the Merrimack River, Hillsboro County, New Hampshire. The transfer of an exemption does not require Commission approval.                

                    2. Madko Hydro LLC is now the exemptee of the Waterloom Falls Hydroelectric Project No. 7920. All correspondence must be forwarded to Jacob Komar, Madko Hydro LLC, 94 River Road, New Ipswich, NH 03071, Phone: 860-214-3219, Email:                     *jacobkomar@me.com.*

Dated: November 9, 2023.

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                                                     *Alden T. Greenwood*                         (Environmental Assessment 1985). Subsequently, on June 6, 2014, the project was transferred to Tridam Energy LLC.                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2023-25401 Filed 11-16-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
# C_2019082EN.01004701.xml

| 4.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/47

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 December 2018 — C=Holdings v EUIPO — Trademarkers (C=commodore)

(Case T-672/16) (1)

((EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Figurative mark C=commodore - Application for invalidation of the effects of the international registration - Article 158(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 198(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation 2017/1001) - No genuine use concerning certain goods and services covered by the international registration - Presence of proper reasons for non-use))

(2019/C 82/53)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: C=Holdings BV (Oldenzaal, Netherlands) (represented by: initially P. Maeyaert and K. Neefs and then P. Maeyaert and J. Muyldermans, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Trademarkers NV (Antwerp, Belgium)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 13 July 2016 (Case R 2585/2015-4), relating to revocation proceedings between Trademarkers and C=Holdings.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 13 July 2016 (Case R 2585/2015-4), relating to revocation proceedings between Trademarkers NV and C=Holdings BV, in so far as the Board of Appeal dismissed the appeal of C=Holdings as regards the existence of proper reasons for non-use of the international registration of which it is the proprietor; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 13 July 2016 (Case R 2585/2015-4), relating to revocation proceedings between Trademarkers NV and C=Holdings BV, in so far as the Board of Appeal dismissed the appeal of C=Holdings as regards the existence of proper reasons for non-use of the international registration of which it is the proprietor;

| 2. | Orders EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders EUIPO to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 410, 7.11.2016.

---
Order entered October 29, 2018

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-00768-CV

NOBLE ANESTHESIA PARTNERS, PLLC, Appellant

V.

U.S. ANESTHESIA PARTNERS, INC., ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 298th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-17-09602

ORDER

Before the Court is appellees’ October 25, 2018 unopposed motion for extension to file 

briefs. Because this is an accelerated appeal, we GRANT the motion to the extent we ORDER

the briefs be filed no later than November 27, 2018. We caution that further extension requests 

will be disfavored.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MARLON CARTER : CIVIL ACTION

:

 v. :

:

BEN VARNER, et al. : NO. 02-4381

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 1st day of August, 2002, upon consideration of Relator's Petition

for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The District Attorney of Philadelphia County shall file specific and detailed

answers within twenty (20) days from the date of this Order pursuant to Rule 5, 28 U.S.C. fol. §

2254, specifically addressing 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d), if applicable.

2. The Clerk of the Quarter Sessions Court or Office of Judicial Support of

Philadelphia County shall file with the Clerk of this Court copies of ALL RECORDS,

INCLUDING transcripts of Notes of Testimony at Arraignment, Trial, Sentencing, Suppression

Hearings, Post Conviction Hearings, Petitions, Pleadings, Opinions and Briefs of State Court

proceedings in the matter of Commonwealth v. Marlon Carter, Court of Common Pleas of

Philadelphia County, No. 9510-185, within twenty (20) days of the date of this order.

BY THE COURT:

 

JACOB P. HART

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Copies faxed to: Copies mailed to:

ENDFIELD 

Case 2:02-cv-04381-HH Document 3 Filed 08/01/2002 Page 1 of 1
Before the Second Division,

October 26, 1960

No. 64812.

#### Garry Manufacturing Co. *v.*United States,

protests 58/11604 and 58/16340 (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of wire rods similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Scoville Manufacturing Co., A. Schrader’s Son Division*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 259, C.D. 2138), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Case No. 15,005.

#### UNITED STATES v. DUNCAN et al.

[4 McLean, *207.]*
      *1*

Circuit Court, D. Illinois.

June Term, 1847.

Liens—Application op Proceeds.

Where there are two liens on the same land, one being paramount to the other, which also covers other lands in the state, the court will order the lands to be sold, reserving the application of the proceeds for the order of the court.

[See Case No. 15,003.]

Mr. Butterfield, for the United States.

Mr. McClure, for defendants.

[Reported by Hon. John McLean. Circuit Justice.]

OPINION OF THE COURT. Judgments were obtained in this court in 1841, which are a lien on the lands of the ancestor of the defendants, throughout the state. In 1846, there was a decree against the same, in favor of the plaintiffs, for forty-nine thousand dollars. Certain judgments have been subsequently entered against the same person, in Morgan county state court, for about six hundred dollars, which create a lien upon the lands in that county. Executions have been issued on the judgments of the United States, and a motion is now made to direct the other lands of Duncan’s heirs in the state, to be sold, in satisfaction of the judgments and decrees above stated. 1 Paige, 185; 19 Johns. 493; 1 Stat. 515.

The court order, that should the land in Morgan county sell for more than the amount of the judgments of the United States, entered in 1841, the solicitor or agent of the United States, shall retain in his own hands such surplus, subject to the order of this court. Or, should such lands sell for less than the balance of said judgments, and the other lands subject to the decree shall sell for more money than the amount of such decree, the surplus shall be held by the solicitor and agent of the United States, subject to the disposition of the court.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

SUNGARD RECOVERY SERVICES, LP :

:

Plaintiff, :

: No. 2:02-CV-04444-PBT

-v.- :

:

COMCAR INDUSTRIES, INC. :

:

Defendant :

:

PRAECIPE FOR SUBSTITUTION OF APPEARANCE

TO THE CLERK:

Kindly substitute counsel for Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff, Comcar Industries, 

Inc.:

Withdraw my appearance:

______________________________

SUSAN L. BUCKNUM

WILLIAM J. O’BRIEN

CONRAD O’BRIEN GELLMAN & 

ROHN, PC

1515 Market St., 16 Floor

Philadelphia, PA 19102

(215) 864-9600

And enter my appearance:

______________________________

ROBERT TOLAND II

SUSAN L. BUCKNUM

CAMPBELL CAMPBELL EDWARDS & CONROY, PC

Three Glenhardie Corporate Center

1265 Drummers Lane, Suite 200

Wayne, PA 19087

(610) 964-1900

Dated: December 18, 2003

Case 2:02-cv-04444-PBT Document 18 Filed 12/19/2003 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Susan L. Bucknum, Esquire, certify that a true and correct copy of the attached 

Praecipe for Substitution of Appearance was caused to be served on the following by 

depositing the same in the United States mail, first class postage prepaid, on December 18, 

2003:

Rebecca Ward, Esquire

Blank Rome Comisky & McCauley, LLP

One Logan Square

Philadelphia, PA 19103

SUSAN L. BUCKNUM

Case 2:02-cv-04444-PBT Document 18 Filed 12/19/2003 Page 2 of 2
KMS: 52889.1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

 

 : 

 : 

KAHAN CHIROPRACTIC CENTER, :

Plaintiff, : 

 : 

v. : CIVIL ACTION 

 : NO. 02-CV-4390

 : 

AETNA U.S. HEALTHCARE, : 

 Defendant. : 

____________________________________ :

CERTIFICATION OF AETNA U.S. HEALTHCARE REGARDING 

LOCAL RULE 53.2 (COMPULSORY ARBITRATION)

 Defendant Aetna U.S. Healthcare (“AUSHC”) hereby states that the above-captioned 

case should not be subject to the compulsory arbitration rules pursuant to Local Rule 53.2. 

Pursuant to Local Rule 53.2, compulsory arbitration is for “civil cases . . . wherein money 

damages only are being sought in an amount not in excess of $150,000.00 exclusive of interest 

and costs.” Id. (emphasis added). The claims in this case are governed exclusively by the 

Employee Retirement Income Security Act, 29 U.S.C. §1001 et seq. (“ERISA”), which allows 

equitable relief only, and does not allow money damages. See Corcoran v. United Healthcare, 

Inc., 965 F.2d 1321, 1335 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 506 U.S. 1033 (1992); Hein v. F.D.I.C., 88 

F.3d 210, 224 (3d Cir. 1996) (finding that ERISA provides for “equitable relief” that “‘does not 

include monetary damages, but rather refers to remedies traditionally viewed as equitable, such 

as injunction or restitution.’”) 

Case 2:02-cv-04390-TON Document 2 Filed 07/12/2002 Page 1 of 3
KMS: 52889.1 2 

Respectfully submitted, 

OF COUNSEL: 

ELLIOTT REIHNER SIEDZIKOWSKI 

 & EGAN, P.C. 

 /s/ Frederick P. Santarelli 

 JOHN M. ELLIOTT 

 FREDERICK P. SANTARELLI 

 KATHRYN M. SCHILLING 

 925 Harvest Drive, Suite 300 

 Blue Bell, PA 19422 

 (215) 977-1000 

Counsel for Defendant 

Aetna U.S. Healthcare 

Dated: July 12, 2002 

Case 2:02-cv-04390-TON Document 2 Filed 07/12/2002 Page 2 of 3
KMS: 52889.1 3 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 The undersigned certifies that on this date a copy of the foregoing is being served upon 

the following persons and in the manner indicated below: 

Via First Class Mail

Randolph C. Smith, Esq. 

1819 JFK Blvd., Suite 400 

Philadelphia, PA 19103 

(215) 568-3885 

Attorney for Plaintiff 

 

 /s/ Frederick P. Santarelli 

 FREDERICK P. SANTARELLI 

DATED: July 12, 2002 

Case 2:02-cv-04390-TON Document 2 Filed 07/12/2002 Page 3 of 3
OFFICIAL NOTICE FROM COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

P.O. BOX 12308, CAPITOL STATION, AUSTIN, TEXAS 78711

tsesPQsfc

3ESS

STAfJtS^^iSABIRSBS Ci

PENALTYFOR : *" c

10/30/201PRIVATE USE

WILKINS, BILLY CHARLES TrJ-CeNd?

OCT31 2014 I

MAILED FROM ZPftft^gjggjj^g

I have this day received and presented to the Court the original application for writ

of habeas corpus. -->.-'

" Abel Acosta, Clerk

BILLY CHARLES WILKINS

PLEASE FORWARD mTC . WEST TEXAS ISF - TDC # 757085

RESIDENT NO LONGER BQX 1359 . . ' :.

AT THIS FACILITY BROWNFIELD, TX 79316 **F I

•JAL-JBS3B 793 i S lillHMiilli''ni'liiil^iilii,lilll'llilili'lillllli'l,i'lll
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

**Certification Pursuant to**

**18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

**As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AXT, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Wilson W. Cheung, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), that, to the best of myknowledge:

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: November 10, 2008 | By:    | /s/ Wilson W. Cheung    |
|-------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                          |   | Wilson W. Cheung        |
|                          |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1367 

To require the Secretary of Energy to conduct a study and issue a report 

that quantifies the energy savings benefits of operational efficiency programs and services for commercial, institutional, industrial, and governmental entities. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 15, 2017 

Ms. WARREN (for herself and Mr. CRAPO) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural 

Resources 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Energy to conduct a study and 

issue a report that quantifies the energy savings benefits 

of operational efficiency programs and services for commercial, institutional, industrial, and governmental entities. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. STUDY AND REPORT ON ENERGY SAVINGS BEN4 EFITS OF OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY PRO5 GRAMS AND SERVICES. 

6 (a) DEFINITION OF OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY PRO7 GRAMS AND SERVICES.—In this section, the term ‘‘operVerDate Sep 11 2014 03:31 Jun 20, 2017 Jkt 069000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S1367.IS S1367

lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1367 IS

1 ational efficiency programs and services’’ means programs 

2 and services that use information and communications 

3 technologies (including computer hardware, energy effi4 ciency software, and power management tools) to operate 

5 buildings and equipment in the optimum manner at the 

6 optimum times. 

7 (b) STUDY AND REPORT.—Not later than 1 year 

8 after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of 

9 Energy shall conduct a study and issue a report that 

10 quantifies the energy savings benefits of operational effi11 ciency programs and services for commercial, institutional, 

12 industrial, and governmental entities, including Federal 

13 agencies. 

14 (c) MEASUREMENT AND VERIFICATION OF ENERGY

15 SAVINGS.—The report required under this section shall 

16 recommend methodologies or protocols for utilities, utility 

17 regulators, and Federal agencies to evaluate, measure, and 

18 verify energy savings from operational efficiency programs 

19 and services. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                                          0001051904
<NAME>                                         FRISBY TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           707,173
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  1,371,684
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (210,000)
<INVENTORY>                                    2,941,889
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               5,159,638
<PP&E>                                         1,464,101
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (652,814)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 7,760,321
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          2,852,962
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                           6,577
<OTHER-SE>                                     4,663,054
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   7,760,321
<SALES>                                        6,807,799
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               7,035,985
<CGS>                                          4,868,886
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  5,322,042
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               5,079,343
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                74,872
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (3,429,169)
<INCOME-TAX>                                           0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (3,429,169)
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (3,429,169)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.56)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (0.56)


</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9
<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION DERIVED FROM
THE QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL INFORMATION.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                  1,000
                                  
       
<S>                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                  MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           400
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         5,626
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                   0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    3,183
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                           700
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                             699
<LOANS>                                       33,391
<ALLOWANCE>                                      364
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                44,819
<DEPOSITS>                                    41,330
<SHORT-TERM>                                       0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              416
<LONG-TERM>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                           0
<OTHER-SE>                                     3,073
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                44,819
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                1,557
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                126
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                  26
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               1,709
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             1,041
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                37
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            631
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                     18
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  473
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  166
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       104
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                     104
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                  2.93
<LOANS-NON>                                       15
<LOANS-PAST>                                     350
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                   0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 346
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      0
<RECOVERIES>                                       0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                364
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             364
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                            0
        


</TABLE>