alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-29-1996
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-02-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-29-1996
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                           1,775
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,422
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,123
<INVENTORY>                                      2,056
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,957
<PP&E>                                         137,718
<DEPRECIATION>                                  53,154
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 121,238
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           35,131
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,862
<OTHER-SE>                                      34,875
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   121,238
<SALES>                                        218,833
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               218,833
<CGS>                                          201,090
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  232,441
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 8,898<F1>
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,815
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (27,321)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (4,374)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (22,947)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (2.05)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (2.05)
<FN>
<F1>Relates to a charge for impairment of long-lived assets under the Statement
of Financial Accounting Standards No. 121.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
**Exhibit
      32.1**







**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




**(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**




In
      connection with the Annual Report of Family Room Entertainment Corporation,
      a
      New Mexico corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-KSB for the year ending June
      30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”),
      I, George Furla, Chief Executive Officer of the Company do each hereby certify,
      pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to
      the best of my knowledge and belief:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.




Date:
      October 12, 2005





/s/
                George FurlaChief
                Executive Officer
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of United Defense
Industries, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge,
that: (i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for
the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Dated: May 3, 2004
    
    /s/ Francis Raborn
Francis Raborn
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before
or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in
such filing.
# C_2018427EN.01006601.xml

| 26.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 427/66 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 427/66

---

Order of the General Court of 27 September 2018 — HS v EIB

(Case T-589/16)

(Civil service - EIB staff - Transfer of pension rights - Amount transferred - Non-contractual liability - Pre-litigation procedure - Conciliation procedure before the EIB - Reasonable period - Manifest inadmissibility)

(2018/C 427/87)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: HS (represented by: A. Senes and L. Payot, then A. Senes, lawyers)

Defendant: European Investment Bank (represented by: T. Gilliams, G. Nuvoli, P. Kijver and G. Faedo initially, then T. Gilliams, P. Kijver and G. Faedo, Agents, and B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Re:

Application, on the basis of Article 270 TFEU, seeking compensation for damage allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of errors committed by the EIB in the transfer of the applicant’s pension rights from the national pension scheme to the EIB pension scheme.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | HS shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

HS shall pay the costs.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE DECEMBER 31, 1995 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                             137
<SECURITIES>                                         9
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,148
<ALLOWANCES>                                        38
<INVENTORY>                                        913
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2,346
<PP&E>                                           2,205
<DEPRECIATION>                                     927
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   5,563
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,329
<BONDS>                                          1,304
<COMMON>                                           219
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,576
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     5,563
<SALES>                                          5,729
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 5,729
<CGS>                                            4,310
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,310
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  87
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    429
<INCOME-TAX>                                       159
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                270
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       270
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     2.55
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     2.54
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WENDELL HILL, : CIVIL ACTION

v. :

WILLIAM PATRICK, et al., : No. 05-5261

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 21st day of December, 2007, upon careful and independent

consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, and

after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Peter B.

Scuderi, and any objections made thereto, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.

2. Objections are overruled.

3. The petition for writ of habeas corpus filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is

DENIED.

4. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability.

BY THE COURT:

 /s/ Edmund V. Ludwig 

EDMUND V. LUDWIG, J.

Case 2:05-cv-05261-EL Document 28 Filed 12/21/07 Page 1 of 1
REVISED INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

ID Number: P-04-0153

ENGINEER: Hall/WRL/CLH 

PV (kg/yr): 

SUBMITTER: 

USE: 

OTHER USES: 

MSDS: Label: 

General Eqp.: 

Respirator: 

Health Effects: 

TLV/PEL (PMN or raw materials): 

CRSS (12/11/2003): 

Chemical Category: 

Molecular Formula: 

VP: 

S-H2O: 

MW: 

Phys State: 

Consumer Use: 

SAT (12/12/2003): 

Groundwater: 

Health: 

Eco: 

PBT Potential: 

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE RATING: 

ASSUMPTIONS: 

POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS: 

EXPOSURE-BASED REVIEW? 
REVISED INITIAL REVIEW ENGINEERING REPORT 

ID Number: P-04-0153

PROC/USE: 

Site/Location: 

Days/yr: 

Process Description: 

ENVIRONMENTAL RELEASES (Eqpt. cleaning, container residue, etc.): 

WATER: 1) 10.4 kg/site-day over Days/year 

and 

2) Worst: 2.4 kg/site-day over Days/year 

 Typical: 0.24 kg/site-day over Days/year 

from: 

to: 

Basis: 

AIR: negligible 

OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE 

 Tot. # of workers: 

 Days/yr: 

Inhalation: 

 mg/day over Days/yr 

 Number of workers with inhalation exposure: 

 Basis: 

Inhalation Monitoring Data Review 

1) Uncertainty (estimate based on model, regulatory limit, 

or data not specific to industry): 

2)a) Exposure level > 1 mg/day? 

OR 

b) Hazard rating for health of 2 or greater? 

Inhalation monitoring data desired? 

Dermal:
### CON CU RRING OP INION No
. 04 -0 8- 00 80 6- CR Ricke SONY , Appellant
v . T h e STA TE of

Te xas, Appellee Fr om the County

Court at L aw No. 4, Be x ar County , Texas Trial Court No. 232446 Honora ble Fr ed Shannon, Judge Pre siding Opinion by : Marialy

n Ba rnar d, J ustice Concurringopinion by : Sandee B ryan Mar ion, J ustice Sitt ing: Sandee B ryan Mar ion, J ustice

Rebec ca Simmons, J ustice Marialy n Ba rnar d, J ustice Deliver ed and F iled: November 11, 2009 Iconcur in the majority ’s judg ment; however , fo r t he re asons set for th in my concur ring opinion in Ur

dia le s v . S tate , N o. 04 -0 8- 00 54 6- CR, 20 09 WL18 83 93 2 ( Te x. Ap p. —Sa n A nto nio J uly 1, 2009, pet. filed), I

urg e the L eg islature to amend its definition of “race ” bec ause the “statutory definition place s an ordinar y l aw -a b i ding pe rson into the position of committ ing a n offe nse, eve n if he is otherw ise observingthe spee d limit , simply by using his v eh i cle to pass another ve hicle.” Id. at *5.

Sandee B ryan Mar ion, J ustice

PUB L I SH
Petition for Exemption

Jaret Wieland Jaret Wieland, LLC.

7544 Hosler Road
Leo, IN 46765

I, Jaret Wieland , hereby submit this petition for exemption under Section 333; FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, Public Law 112

- 95 FEB. 14, 2012, Section 333. I request this exemption in order to operate my UAV/UAS, DJI Phantom 3

, in order to provide services for profit to include aerial photography, aerial cinematography, aerial filming and photography for real estate, construction firms, agricultural mode ling, crop monitoring operations, aerial mapping, special events to include but not limited to weddings, private or public parties/events, business advertising, promotional events, geological surveying, and

environmental studies.

The ability to provide th ese services to other local businesses and individuals in my community will benefit them by opening up opportunities they otherwise did not have before. Traditional methods of aerial photography/videography are simply not viable options for the

average con sumer as they are costly and involve greater risks to everyone involved; i.e. the use of larger aircraft carrying humans and flammable fuel. By utilizing the UAV/UAS the

same results can be achieved with much safer conditions.

Prior to each flight/operat ion of the UAV/UAS, I will conduct a Pre

- Flight Safety Inspection. All flights will be performed areas cleared for flight using the FAA B4UFLY Smartphone App (or similar) to make sure we are in authorized airspace. Flights will not take place over densely populated areas or private property without the owners permission. The UAV/UAS will only be operated within visual line of sight and will not be flown near airports or above

400 feet. Necessary repairs will be perfo rmed by the manufacturers authorized repair facilities/ providers. The FAA can be confident that operations of this UAV/UAS will achieve at least the equivalent or greater level of safety.

The requests of this petition are similar to those of Scott Vigneault, Brian Punch

, Mr. Jase W. Robak, Mr. Todd Thomas Drone Pics, Brandon Drivon, and Mr. Mike Lloyd Lloyd & Associates, all of whom have received Section 333 exemptions for comparable aircraft for similar operations.

The specific sections of 14 C.F .R from which I am seeking exemption are as follows: 14 C.F.R. Part 21; 14 C.F.R. 45.23(b); 14 C.F.R. 61.101(e)(4), & (5); 14 C.F.R. 61.113(a) & (b); 14 C.F.R. 61.133 (a); 14 C.F.R. 61.23(a) & (c); 14 C.F.R 91.7(a) 14 C.F.R. 91.9(b)(2); 14C.F.R. 91.109(a); 14 C.F.R. 91.119; 14 C.F.R. 91.121; 14 C.F.R. 91.151(a); 14 C.F.R. 91.203(a) & (b);14 C.F.R. 91.405(a); 14 C.F.R. 91.407(a)(1); 14 C.F.R. 91.409(a)(2}; 14 C.F.R. 91.417(a) & (b).

Please find the included Phantom 3 Quick Start Guide, Safety Guide

, and Intelli gent Flight Battery Safety Guide

.

I truly thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,

Jaret Wieland

Founder Jaret Wieland, LLC.
No. 48454.

#### Protests 69684-K, etc., of F. W. Myers & Co., Inc., et al. (Detroit, etc.).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 67825.

#### Excelsior Accordions, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 59/26503, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of chord organs and parts thereof similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Excelsior Accordions, Inc.*v. *United States*(48 Cust. Ct. 148, C.D. 2328), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                   SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The  undersigned,  in the  capacities and on the date  indicated  below,  hereby
certifies that:

1. This annual report of FBO Air, Inc. fully complies with the  requirements  of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operation of FBO Air, Inc.


Date:    March 29, 2005                 By:  /s/ Ronald J. Ricciardi
                                           ------------------------------------
                                             Ronald J. Ricciardi,
                                             Chief Executive Officer
                                             (Principal Executive and Financial
                                             Officer)

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document  authentications,  acknowledging,  or otherwise  adopting the signature
that  appears  in typed  form  within the  electronic  version  of this  written
statement  required by Section 906, has been  provided to FBO Air, Inc. and will
be retained by FBO Air,  Inc.,  and  furnished  to the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1165 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1165

 To designate the medical center of the Department of Veterans Affairs 
  in Huntington, West Virginia, as the Hershel ``Woody'' Williams VA 
                            Medical Center.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 17, 2017

  Mr. Manchin (for himself and Mrs. Capito) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' 
                                Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate the medical center of the Department of Veterans Affairs 
  in Huntington, West Virginia, as the Hershel ``Woody'' Williams VA 
                            Medical Center.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF HERSHEL ``WOODY'' WILLIAMS VA MEDICAL CENTER 
              IN HUNTINGTON, WEST VIRGINIA.

    (a) Designation.--The medical center of the Department of Veterans 
Affairs in Huntington, West Virginia, shall after the date of the 
enactment of this Act be known and designated as the ``Hershel `Woody' 
Williams VA Medical Center''.
    (b) Reference.--Any reference in any law, regulation, map, 
document, paper, or other record of the United States to the medical 
center referred to in subsection (a) shall be considered to be a 
reference to the Hershel ``Woody'' Williams VA Medical Center.
                                 <all>
```
# Data

&"Calibri,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2021-17	&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000DRAFT&K01+000 VII VSR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"&10IRC Handout 4/21/21
Case 2:05-cv-05054-RK Document 22 Filed 09/21/06 Page 1 of 9
Case 2:05-cv-05054-RK Document 22 Filed 09/21/06 Page 2 of 9
Case 2:05-cv-05054-RK Document 22 Filed 09/21/06 Page 3 of 9
Case 2:05-cv-05054-RK Document 22 Filed 09/21/06 Page 4 of 9
Case 2:05-cv-05054-RK Document 22 Filed 09/21/06 Page 5 of 9
Case 2:05-cv-05054-RK Document 22 Filed 09/21/06 Page 6 of 9
Case 2:05-cv-05054-RK Document 22 Filed 09/21/06 Page 7 of 9
Case 2:05-cv-05054-RK Document 22 Filed 09/21/06 Page 8 of 9
Case 2:05-cv-05054-RK Document 22 Filed 09/21/06 Page 9 of 9
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JAMES REEVES, III, a minor : CIVIL ACTION

by his p/n/g ALTHEA JACOBS :

:

 v. :

:

VANESSA CARTER-MORAGNE, et al.: NO. 02-4428

 ORDER

AND NOW, this 12th day of October, 2006, upon

consideration of the petition of Althea Jacobs, parent and

guardian of James Reeves, III, a minor (document no. 22), in

which she requests that this Court authorize the withdrawal of

$2,000.00 from the minor's account opened, pursuant to this

Court's Order, at Citizens Bank, and the Court accepting

petitioner's representation that she "is unable to afford" a

computer and printer which her son needs for school, and that her

son "being an honor roll student" is reasonably in need of this

technology for his education, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The petition is GRANTED; and

2. Althea Jacobs, as parent and guardian of James

Reeves, III, is AUTHORIZED to withdraw $2,000.00 from the 

Citizens Bank Certificate of Deposit under Account No. 6241-

498415, solely for the purchase of a computer and printer.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Stewart Dalzell, J. 

Case 2:02-cv-04428-SD Document 23 Filed 10/12/2006 Page 1 of 1
# Main

&"Arial,Bold"Part 1SUPPLEMENT		&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2015 ReportingSection VI

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2015-XX	&"Arial,Bold"DRAFT VI RSNC - &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout August 6, 2015

# Footnotes and Additional Inform

&"Arial,Bold"Part 1SUPPLEMENT		&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2015 ReportingSection VI

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2015-XX	&"Arial,Bold"DRAFT VI RSNC - &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout August 6, 2015
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Merrill Lynch Preferred
Capital Trust IV (the "Trust") and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding IV, L.P.
for the period ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marlene Debel,
Regular Trustee of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.





                              MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST IV


                              By:  /s/ MARLENE DEBEL
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                              Name:    Marlene Debel *
                              Title:   Regular Trustee









Dated: August 14, 2009
----------------------

* Marlene Debel functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
  and Chief  Financial  Officer of the Trust for  purposes  of Section  906
  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
II 

118TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 3919 

To render State or local governments with certain bail and pretrial detention 

policies ineligible to receive funds under the Edward Byrne Memorial 

Justice Assistance Grant Program. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MARCH 12, 2024 

Mrs. BLACKBURN (for herself and Mr. CRAMER) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To render State or local governments with certain bail and 

pretrial detention policies ineligible to receive funds 

under the Edward Byrne Memorial Justice Assistance 

Grant Program. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Keep Violent Criminals 

5 Off Our Streets Act’’. 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
2 

•S 3919 IS

1 SEC. 2. PROHIBITION ON GRANTS FOR CERTAIN ENTITIES. 

2 Section 502 of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control 

3 and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (34 U.S.C. 10153) is amend4 ed by adding at the end the following: 

5 ‘‘(c) INELIGIBILITY.—For the first fiscal year begin6 ning after the date of enactment of the Keep Violent 

7 Criminals Off Our Streets Act for which a State or unit 

8 of local government requests a grant under this subpart 

9 (or requests a renewal or extension of such a grant), and 

10 each fiscal year thereafter, if the State or unit of local 

11 government has in effect a policy or law that prohibits the 

12 use of cash bail for all offenders or that does not employ 

13 pretrial detention practices for every violent offender, in14 cluding every violent juvenile offender, the State of unit 

15 of local government may not be awarded a grant under 

16 this subpart (or a renewal or extension of such a grant).’’. 

Æ 


kjohnson on DSK7ZCZBW3PROD with $$_JOB
No. 60008.

#### A. D. Cohen Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 197473-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of hoods the same in all material respects as those passed upon in *United States*v. *Accurate Millinery Co., Roberts, Reilly & Sons, et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 229, C. A. D. 599), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.