alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 4.2

SUMMARY OF LEASE AGREEMENT

Following are the principal terms of our lease agreement for our offices, which
was signed on June 26, 2003:

o    ADDRESS:       82 Menachem Begin Road, Tel Aviv, Israel.

o    DESCRIPTION
     OF OFFICES:    Entire 4th floor of the building, encompassing approximately
                    12,000 square feet.

o    ADDITIONS:     Parking spaces and storage space in building's basement.

o    TERM OF LEASE: Three years, commencing on September 1, 2003, with an option
                    for three more years, as described below .

o    RENTAL
     PAYMENTS:      Approximately $11,000 per month for the offices and
                    approximately an additional $5,000 for parking and storage
                    space. These amounts are linked to the Consumer's Price
                    Index.

o    OPTION:        An option to extend the lease for an additional three years,
                    until August 31, 2009, was exercised. Beginning September 1,
                    2006, the rental charges will be increased by 5%, plus any
                    increases in the Consumer's Price Index.

o    ADDITIONAL
     COSTS:         Maintenance, municipal property tax and other related
                    expenses.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                         975,566
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  148,765
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             5,186,959
<PP&E>                                       1,884,261
<DEPRECIATION>                                 554,068
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               7,474,554
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,116,280
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        38,512
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,667,037
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 7,474,554
<SALES>                                      4,738,557
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,738,557
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,865,888
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              72,826
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,911,885)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (647,932)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,263,953)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,263,953)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.09)


</TABLE>
----

Commission communication in the framework of the implementation of Directive 1999/5/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 1999 on radio equipment and telecommunications terminal equipment and the mutual recognition of their conformity

(2006/C 201/01)

(Text with EEA relevance)

(Publication of titles and references of harmonised standards under the Directive)

Example: For EN 60215:1989, the following applies:

Note:

----

(1)

----
# THE STATE OF TEXAS

M A N D A T E

*********************************************

TO THE 241ST DISTRIC T COURT OF SMITH COU NTY, GREETING:

Before our Court of Appeals for the 12th Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 8th
day of July , 2015 , the cause up on appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

JEFFREY DOCK WRIGHT , Appellant

NO. 12

- 14

- 00125

- CR; Trial Court No. 241

- 1880

- 13

Opinion by Bill Bass, Justice.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order i n these words:

“ THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record and briefs filed herein, and the same being considered, it is the opinion of this court that there was no error in the judgment.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED that the judgment of the court

below be in all things affirmed , and that this decision be certified to the court below for

observance. ”

WHEREAS, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District of Texas in this behalf, and in all things have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, THE HONORABLE JAMES T. WORTHEN , Chief Justice of our Court of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the City of Tyler, thi s the 5 th day of October, 2015.

PAM ESTES, CLERK

By:

_______________________________ Chief Deputy Clerk
**Exhibit
      32.2**







**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




**(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**







In
      connection with the Annual Report of Family Room Entertainment Corporation,
      a
      New Mexico corporation (the “Company”), on Form 10-KSB for the year ending June
      30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”),
      I, Stanley Tepper, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, respectively, do
      each
      hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. §
      1350), that to the best of my knowledge and belief:




(1)The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





Date:
      October 12, 2005





/s/
                Stanley TepperStanley
                Tepper
              Chief
                Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001052102
<NAME> C2, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       6,085,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               12,452,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                   391,000
<INVENTORY>                                  6,279,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            25,430,000
<PP&E>                                     109,452,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              35,197,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             119,455,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       16,554,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    20,410,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,979,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               119,455,000
<SALES>                                      2,127,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            25,874,000
<CGS>                                        1,744,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               24,900,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               326,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             827,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (189,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    11,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (178,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (178,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.03)
        

</TABLE>
# sec5_sbr_2024

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2024-01	&"Arial,Bold"&10V SBR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"&10IRC Handout November 29. 2023
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ANDREA CONSTAND, : 

: CIVIL ACTION

Plaintiff, : NO. 05-1099

:

v. :

: 

WILLIAM H. COSBY, JR., :

:

Defendant. :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 21st day of December, 2015, it is hereby 

ordered that the Motion for Leave to File (ECF No. 109) and 

Motion to Strike (ECF No. 113) are DENIED as moot.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Eduardo C. Robreno

EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, J.

Case 2:05-cv-01099-ER Document 128 Filed 12/21/15 Page 1 of 1
# Main

&"ARIAL,Bold"&8Bulletin 2020-15	&"ARIAL,Bold"&8Reclassified Balance Sheet	&"ARIAL,Bold"&8June 2020

# Footnotes and Additional Inform
Case No. 14,416.

#### UNITED STATES v. ABBOTT.

[Cited in Johnson v. Chapman, Case No. 7.378. Nowhere reported; opinion not now accessible.]
# C_2019072EN.01001901.xml

| 25.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 72/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 72/19

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 December 2018 — Colin v Commission

(Case T-614/16) (1)

((Civil service - Recruitment - Notice of competition - Open competition - Conditions of admission - Non-inclusion on the reserve list - Diploma - Professional experience))

(2019/C 72/23)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Caroline Colin (Waterloo, Belgium) (represented initially by N. de Montigny and J.-N. Louis and subsequently by N. de Montigny, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Radu Bouyon and F. Simonetti, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 270 TFEU seeking the annulment, first, of the decision of 18 February 2015 of the selection board in Open Competition EPSO/AST-SC/01/14, organised by the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO), not to include the applicant’s name on the reserve list from which to recruit officials in the institutions of the European Union, secondly, of the decision of 17 September 2015, of the same selection board, to reject her request for a review and, thirdly, of the Commission’s rejection decision of 12 May 2016 in response to the applicant’s complaint against the selection board’s decision.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of 17 September 2015 by which the selection board in Open Competition EPSO/AST-SC/01/14 confirmed, after review, that the applicant could not be included in the reserve list from that competition; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of 17 September 2015 by which the selection board in Open Competition EPSO/AST-SC/01/14 confirmed, after review, that the applicant could not be included in the reserve list from that competition;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 371, 10.10.2016 (case initially registered before the European Union Civil Service Tribunal under Case F-44/16 and transferred to the European Union Civil Service Tribunal on 1.9.2016).

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

TALMADGE W. TAYLOR, JR. : CIVIL ACTION

:

:

 v. :

:

:

NORTH AMERICAN AVIATION : NO. 2002-2748

SERVICES

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of October, 2002, it is hereby

Ordered that the above case is Dismissed for Lack of Prosecution.

This action was filed on May 8, 2002, and as of this date, service

has not been effected. Plaintiff has been notified by the Clerk

that failure to make service by September 27, 2002, or to show good

cause as to why this case should not be dismissed would result in

dismissal for lack of prosecution. Since neither service was

effected, nor good cause shown, dismissal is warranted.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

 

 Clarence C. Newcomer, S.J.

Case 2:02-cv-02748-CN Document 4 Filed 10/30/2002 Page 1 of 1
# C_2017202EN.01001901.xml

| 26.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/19

---

Order of the General Court of 24 April 2017 — Dreimane v Commission

(Case T-618/16) (1)

1

((Action for annulment and compensation - Civil service - Officials - Pensions - Transfer of national pension rights - Calculation of years of pensionable service - Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations - Time-limit - Inadmissibility))

(2017/C 202/33)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Sandra Dreimane (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: J. Ābiks, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Gattinara and L. Radu Bouyon, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action under Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of the Commission decision fixing the number of additional pensionable years to be taken into account in the pension scheme of the EU institutions following the applicant’s request to transfer pension rights acquired before she entered the service of the European Union, and, second, compensation for the damage allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of the Commission’s failure to act within a reasonable period in the processing of that transfer request.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as being inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as being inadmissible.

| 2. | There is no need to rule on the application to intervene submitted by the Council of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

2.

There is no need to rule on the application to intervene submitted by the Council of the European Union.

| 3. | Ms Sandra Dreimane shall bear her own costs and also pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Ms Sandra Dreimane shall bear her own costs and also pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 371, 10.10.2016 (case initially registered before the European Union Civil Service Tribunal under Case No F-48/16 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1.9.2016).

1

---
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
                                                                                               EXHIBIT 12
                         INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY
                  Computation of Consolidated Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                                 (in thousands except ratio data)
<CAPTION>
                                                                     Year Ended December 31,
                                                       1994       1995       1996       1997       1998
<S>                                                  <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>
Fixed Charges:
  Interest on First Mortgage Bonds. . . . . . . .    $ 43,564   $ 43,410   $ 41,209   $ 39,678   $ 35,910
  Interest on Other Long-term Debt. . . . . . . .      24,725     23,564     20,100     21,064     27,457
  Interest on Short-term Debt . . . . . . . . . .       1,883      2,003      2,982      3,248      4,903
  Miscellaneous Interest Charges. . . . . . . . .       3,520      3,472      3,262      3,187      3,113
  Estimated Interest Element in Lease Rentals . .      85,000     82,700     82,600     79,700     79,300
       Total Fixed Charges. . . . . . . . . . . .    $158,692   $155,149   $150,153   $146,877   $150,683

Earnings:
  Net Income. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .    $157,502   $141,092   $157,153   $146,740   $ 96,628
  Plus Federal Income Taxes . . . . . . . . . . .      32,303     55,990     76,899     74,223     47,210
  Plus State Income Taxes . . . . . . . . . . . .       6,063      7,058      9,270      7,519      4,938
  Plus Fixed Charges (as above) . . . . . . . . .     158,692    155,149    150,153    146,877    150,683
       Total Earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . .    $354,560   $359,289   $393,475   $375,359   $299,459

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges. . . . . . . .        2.23       2.31       2.62       2.55       1.98
</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

: CIVIL ACTION NOS.

:

HAMMOND, et al. : 02-4409

GRESH, et al. : 02-4410

GEARINGER, SR. : 02-4411

BRASSILL : 02-4413

FYE : 02-4414

SEARFOSS : 02-4415

SMITH, et al. : 02-4416

MEYER, et al. : 02-4480

BINDER, et al. : 02-4658

BOULOUS : 02-4659

NEES, SR., et al. : 02-4730

WHELAN, et al. : 02-5164

MENTZER : 02-5165

MCELHINEY, et al. : 02-5317

DELGAUDIO, et al. : 02-5318

WAGNER, et al. : 02-5319

:

V. :

:

DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION :

et al. : :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of August, 2002, it is hereby

ORDERED that the above-captioned case or cases are referred to the Honorable

Charles R. Weiner for the purposes of the monitoring and the coordination of the status of

discovery, scheduling of arbitration hearings (if appropriate), settlement negotiations (if

appropriate), and scheduling trial dates (if appropriate), and it is further

ORDERED that the above-captioned case(s) shall remain on the calendar(s) of the

judge(s) to whom they were assigned at the time of filing, until further order of this court,

and, it is further 

Case 2:02-cv-04415-JCJ Document 4 Filed 08/13/2002 Page 1 of 2
-2-

ORDERED that counsel for defendant(s) who filed a petition for removal of the

above-captioned case(s) to this court shall serve a copy of this Order on counsel for

plaintiff(s) in the above-captioned case(s), and, it is further

ORDERED that the relevant Prothonotaries of the Courts of Common Pleas

located within the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Eastern District 

of Pennsylvania that the above-captioned case or cases have been removed from shall

retain the original records in these matters, pending further Order of this court.

 

JAMES T. GILES, Ch.J.

Case 2:02-cv-04415-JCJ Document 4 Filed 08/13/2002 Page 2 of 2
# IRC Handouts 02 14 19

&"Arial,Bold"&12U.S. Standard General LedgerSummary of Changes	

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2019-06	&"Arial,Bold"DRAFT &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handouts 02 14 19

# Additional Information

&"Arial,Bold"&12U.S. Standard General LedgerSummary of Changes	

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2019-06	&"Arial,Bold" DRAFT &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handouts 02 14 19
No. 64775.

#### Langfelder, Homma & Carroll, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 60/6497 (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, O. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of glass ornamental novelties similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 62984, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Part 2

SUPPLEMENT 

DRAFT 

No Name Description Rule Attribute Combination

27

Credit Cohort Year and Financing Account Code Validation

If Financing Account Code for the TAS is D (Direct) or G (Guaranteed) on the SMAF and the USSGL account is budgetary, then the Credit Cohort Year is required. Otherwise, Credit Cohort Year should be null. Pass

CREDIT COHORT 

YEAR

BUDGETARY 

PROPRIETARY

FINANCING 

ACCOUNT CODE

=2022 =B =D=2022 =B =G

27E

Credit Cohort Year and Financing Account Code Validation

If Financing Account Code for the TAS is D (Direct) or G (Guaranteed) on the SMAF and the USSGL account is budgetary, then the Credit Cohort Year is required. Otherwise, Credit Cohort Year should be null.

CREDIT COHORT 

YEAR

CONCATENATED 

TAS

FINANCING 

ACCOUNT CODE

Pass 20222023 012 X4158000 D

Pass 20222023 012 X4158000 GPass 20222023 086 X4587000 DPass 20222023 086 X4587000 G

99E USSGL Reimbursable Flag "R" Restriction

The use of some USSGL accounts with Reimbursable Flag "R" is limited to specific TAS.

USSGL ACCOUNT 

NUMBER

CONCATENATED 

TAS

Pass 426100

09720212021 

0130000

Pass 439300 014 X0102000

111E

Special and Trust Fund Restriction for Specific USSGL Accounts with Reimbursable Flag "D"

Reporting some USSGL accounts with Reimbursable Flag "D" and Fund Type "ES" or "ET" is restricted to specific Fund Families.

USSGL ACCOUNT 

NUMBER Fund Family

Pass 426100 0978164

Pass 426600 0148370Pass 427700 0148370

121 Restricted Use of USSGL Account 421100

The use of USSGL account 421100 is restricted to specific Department of Defense TAS only. Fail

USSGL ACCOUNT 

NUMBER

=421100

121E Restricted Use of USSGL Account 421100

The use of USSGL account 421100 is restricted to specific Department of Defense TAS only. Fund Family

Pass 0974930

U.S. Standard General Ledger

Data Validations - Detail

Bulletin No. 2021-17 DRAFT VII VDR - 1
Document



Exhibit 10.46


October 2020


Alex Shvartsburg


Dear Alex,


I am pleased to inform you that effective from the earlier of 31 October 2020 and the date of the next 10Q filing for the Company, you will be covering the role of ad interim Chief Financial Officer.


We have opened a search for the replacement of the former incumbent and you will maintain the role till the new Chief Financial Officer will start.


Compensation Package
As a result of this new responsibility, effectively from the same date and till you will hold this ad interim role, you will receive a monthly additional cash reward in the amount of GBP 5,000.


This additional reward is eligible for pension contributions and it will not be considered to calculate your Short-Term Incentive target.


Equity award
In addition, on December 15, 2020, we will recommend to the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors a grant of an equity award with a grant-date value equal to $150,000. The award consists of 100% Restricted Stock Units.


The calculation of the number of RSUs will be based on December 14 stock price, i.e. the latest
available closing price at the grant date. 25% of the RSUs will vest on each of the four
anniversaries following this date.


The grant of any of the equity awards under the LivaNova Incentive Plan (“the Plan”) as
described in this letter is always subject to the discretion of the Compensation Committee, and
nothing in this letter shall be taken to fetter the discretion of the Compensation Committee.


Grant and vesting of any of the awards is conditional on your continued employment with the
Company or its subsidiaries and vesting will cease upon you ceasing to be employed by the
Company. All awards made under the Plan will be subject to the terms of the Plan and the
award agreement pursuant to which the award is granted.


Congratulations, and thank you for making LivaNova the great organization that it is.
Kind regards,


Damien McDonald