T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d byN i nth C i r c ui tR ul e 36- 3.

T he H onor abl e J oa n H . L e f kow , U ni t e d S t a t e s D i s tr i c tJ udge f orthe ** N orthe rn D i s tr i c tof

I l l i noi s , s i tt i ng by de s i gna t i on. NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS F O R T H E N IN T H C IR C U IT MAR I O G UE R R A, P e titio n e r- A p p e lla n t, v. TH O M A S FELK ER, R es po nd ent- A pp el l ee . N o. 07- 55891 D . C. N o . CV 0 5 - 8 3 1 3 - CJ C ( RN B) ME MOR AN DU M *

A p p e a l f r o m th e U n ite d S ta te s D is tr ic t C o u rt f o rth e C e n tr a l D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia C orm a c J . C a rne y , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng A r gue d a nd S ubm i tt e d M a y3, 2010 P a s a d e n a , C a lif

o rn ia B e f o r e : O’ S C AN NL AI N an d T AL L MAN, C i r c u i tJ u d g e s , a n d L E F KO W, ** D i stri ctJudg e. P e titio n e r - A p p e lla n t M a r io G u e rr aap p e a ls th e d is tr ic t c o u rt’s d e n ia l o f h is 28 U . S . C . § 2254 pe t i t i on, w hi c h a l l e ge d he w a s de ni e d hi s r i ghtt o c onf r ont a t i on u n d erth e S ix th A m en d m en t b y th e a d m issio n o f h is co -d ef en d an t Jairo A n d ra d e’s 

# FI LED MA Y14 2 010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSA l though Cr aw f ord abrogat ed the R o b ert s te s t, R o b ert

s ap p l i es t o th i s case 1 because Cra w

f o rd w a s d e c id e d a f

te rG u e rr a ’s c o n v ic tio n b e c a m e f in a l. W ho rton v. B oc kt i ng , 54 9 U . S . 40 6, 40 9 (20 07 ). 2 out - of - c ourts t a t e m e nt . B e c aus e the pa rt i e s a r e f a m i l i a rw i th the f

a c t s a nd pr oc e dur a l hi s t ory , w e do notr e s t a t e the m he r e e xc e pta s ne c e s s a ryt o e xpl a i n our d i s p o s i t i o n . We h a v e j u r i s d i c t i o n p u r s u a n tt o 2 8 U. S . C . § 2 2 5 3 . We r e v i e w de no vo th e d is tr ic t c o u rt’s d e n ia l o f a§ 2 2 5 4 p e titio n , W

a sh i n g to n v. L a m

p ert , 422 F. 3 d 8 6 4 , 8 6 9 ( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 0 5 ) , a n d w e a f f i rm. H abe a s r e l i e f

i s w a rr a nt e d onl yi f

the S t a t e c ourt ’ s de c i s i on “ w a s c ontr a ry t o, or i nv ol ved an u nrea sonabl e app l i ca t i on of, cl earl y e st abl i shed F eder al l aw , as de t e rm i ne d bythe S upr e m e C ourtof the U ni t e d S t a t e s , ” 28 U . S . C . § 2254( d) ( 1) , or

“ w as base d o n an u nrea sonabl e det erm i nat i on of the fa ct s i n l i gh tof the evi dence pres ent ed i n the S t at e c ou rtproceedi ng , ” i d. § 2254( d) ( 2) . G ue rr a ’ s C onf r ont a t i on C l au se ch al l en g e i s g o v ern ed b y O hi o v. R o b e r ts , 4 4 8 U .S . 5 6 ( 1 9 8 0 ) , o v e rr u le d in par t byCr aw f ord v . W as hi ngton , 541 U . S . 36 ( 2004) , a nd L illyv . V ir g in ia , 527 U . S . 11 6 (19 99 ). 1 U nd er R o b e r ts , the a dm i s s i on of a n a c c om pl i c e ’ s out - of - c ourts t a t e m e nt i nc ul pa t i ng ac r i m i na l de f e nda ntdoe s notvi ol a t e the C onf r ont a t i on C l aus e i f

the w i tne s s i s una va i l abl e a nd the s t a t e m e ntbe a r s pa rt i c ul a r i z e d gua r a nt e e s of tru s tw o rth in e s s . R o b e r ts , 44 8 U . S . at66 . H er e, i ti s uncon t es t ed thatA nd ra de w as3

una va i l abl e t o t e s t i f

ya ttr i a l . A s t a t e m e ntm aybe a dm i tt e d “ [ w ] he n ac ourtc a n be c onf i de nt. . . tha t‘ the de c l a r a nt ’ s truthf ul ne s s i s s o c l e a rf

r om the s urr oundi ng ci rc um st ance s thatthe t es tof cr oss- exam i nat i on w ou l d b e of m ar gi nal ut i l i ty. ’ ” L illy , 5 2 7 U . S. a t136 ( quot i ng Idah o v. W r i ght , 4 9 7 U .S . 8 0 5 , 8 2 0 ( 1 9 9 0 ) ) . I n e v a lu a tin g th e tru s tw o rth in e s s o f A n d r a d e ’s s ta te m e n ts , th e C a lif o rn ia Co u rto f A p p e a l c o n s i d e r e d e x tr i n s i c e v i d e n c e p r e s e n t e d a tG u e rr a ’ s tr i a l . By tak in g in to ac co u n t th is co rr o b o ra ti n g ev id en ce , th e C alifo rn ia C o u rt o f A p p ea l’ s d e c is io n w a s c o n tr a ryto c le a r lye s tab lis h e d f e d e r a l la w . Se e L illy , 52 7 U . S . at 1 3 7

– 3 8 ; W

r i ght , 4 9 7 U. S . a t8 2 2

– 2 3 . T h u s , we r e v i e w de no vo w he the rthe a dm i s s i on of

A ndr a de ’ s out - of

- c ourts t a t e m e ntvi ol a t e d G ue rr a ’ s c onf r ont a t i on r ig h t. Fr a n tz v. H

azey , 5 3 3 F .3 d 7 2 4 , 7 3 9 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 8 ) ( e n b a n c ) . A ft er de nov o r e vi e w , w e c onc l ude tha tA ndr a de ’ s s t a t e m e ntc ont a i ns su ff icien t i n d icia o f r eliab il ity to d em o n stra te it s tru stw o rth in es s. A n d ra d e’s s t a t e m e ntt o C e s a rM a r i s c a l , af e l l ow ga ng m e m be r , w a s notm a de unde rc oe r c i ve c ondi t i ons . A ndr a de i de nt i f i e d G ue rr aa s the othe rs hoot e ri nvol ve d i n the i nc i de nt pri or t o i nq ui ri ng w hether M ar i sc al w as coop er at i ng w i th the po l i ce . E ven aft er e x p r e s s in g h is s u s p ic io n th a t th e p o lic e w e r e in v o lv e d , A n d r a d e p e r s is te d in c onf i di ng i n M a r i s c a l a nd c ont i nue d t o pr ovi de de t a i l e d i nf orm a t i on aboutthe s h o o tin g th a t o n lyap a rtic ip a n t in th e c r im e w o u ld k n o w . A lth o u g h A n d r a d e d id4

i m p l i cat e G u erra as the o th er sh o o t er, i n d o i n g so h e w as n o tatt em p t i n g t o fo i st bl am e on G uerr a w hi l e m i ni m i zi ng hi s ow n res po nsi bi l i ty. Inst ea d, A nd ra de w as

“ u n ab a s h e d l yi n c u l p a t i n g h i m s e l f wh i l e m ak i n g n o e f

f o rtt o m i t i g a t e h i s o wn cond uct , ” P a d illa v . T

e rhune , 309 F . 3d 614, 619 ( 9th C i r . 2002) ( quot i ng U ni ted State s v . B oone , 229 F . 3d 1231, 1234 ( 9th C i r . 2000) ( i nt e rna l quot a t i on m a rks om i tt ed), even w i shi ng thathe coul d t ake m ore c re di t . T hatA nd ra de t ol d M ar i sc al i n the c our s e of

c onve r s a t i on tha ta nothe rga ng m e m be r , S c r appy , w a s i n j a i l f or m u rd erin stea d o f v an d alism d o es n o t d etra ct fr o m th e r eliab il ity o f A n d ra d e’s statem en ts re g ar d in g th e s h o o ti n g g iv en th eir h ig h ly d etailed n atu re an d A n d ra d e’s w i l l i ng ness t o t ake c re di tfor w hathad o cc urre d. T hu s, w e c on cl ud e that A ndr a de ’ s s t a t e m e nt s be a rs uf f i c i e nti ndi c i aof

r e l i abi l i tya nd tha tthe i ra dm i s s i on a t G u e rr a ’s tr ia l d id n o t v io la te G u e rr a ’s c o n f r o n ta tio n r ig h t. G ue rr apr e s e nt e d a n unc e rt i f i e d i s s ue i n hi s ope ni ng br i e f , a r gui ng tha tthe di s tr i c tc ourte rr e d i n de ny i ng hi s c l a i m of i ne f f e c t i ve a s s i s t a nc e of

tr i a l c ouns e l f

or f a ilu r e to in te rv ie w p o te n tia l a lib i w itn e s s e s a n d p r e s e n t a n a lib i d e f e n s e . W e c o n s tru e its in c lu s io n a s am o tio n to e x p a n d th e c e rtif ic a te o f ap p e a lab ility . B e c aus e r e a s onabl e j ur i s t s w oul d notf i nd the unc e rt i f

i e d i s s ue de ba t abl e , w e de ny th a t m o tio n . 2 8 U .S .C . § 2 2 5 3 ( c ) ( 2 ) ; D oe v. W o o d f o rd , 50 8 F . 3d 56 3, 56 7 (9th C i r. 20 07 ).5

AF F I RME D.