alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In  connection  with the Annual  Report on Form 10-K of Saucony,  Inc. (the
"Company")  for the period ended January 2, 2004,  as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  Michael Umana, Chief
Financial  Officer  of the  Company,  hereby  certifies,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material respects,  the financial condition and results of the operations of the
Company.



Dated:  March 30, 2004                /s/ Michael Umana
                                      --------------------------------
                                      Michael Umana
                                      Chief Financial Officer
No. 52549.

protest 139864 — K (New York).

#### Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cole, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise in question is the same in all material respects as the estrogenic hormone passed upon in *Roche-Organon*v. *United States*(35 C. C. P. A. 99, C. A. D. 378). The claim at 10 percent under paragraph 34 was therefore sustained.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE: ASBESTOS PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

This document relates to:

 : CIVIL ACTION

02-4363 RONEY : NO. MDL 875

02-4409 HAMMOND :

02-4410 GRESH :

02-4411 GEARINGER :

02-4413 BRASSILL :

02-4414 FYE :

02-4415 SEARFOSS :

02-4416 SMITH :

02-4479 SMALL :

02-4480 MEYER :

02-4608 BINDER :

02-4658 BINDER :

02-4659 BOULOUS :

02-4730 NEES :

02-4753 CUTHBERT :

02-4754 WILLIAMS :

02-4841 BROWN :

02-5164 WHELAN :

02-5165 MENTZER :

02-5317 MCELHINEY :

02-5318 DELGAUDIO :

02-5319 WAGNER :

02-5891 WALSH :

02-5892 BRAUN :

02-5893 WAGNER :

02-5894 DELGADIO :

O R D E R

The Court having been advised that the issues raised in

each of these actions are also presently pending before the

Honorable District Court Judge Alfred Wolin. Judge Wolin has

been specially designated to sit in the District of Delaware and

preside over these matters. Further, the Judge has set a

schedule and will proceed appropriately. In the interest of

judicial economy and for a prompt resolution of all outstanding

issues this Court will hold its action in abeyance and await the

ruling by the Bankruptcy Court.

Case 2:02-cv-04411-RB Document 4 Filed 08/09/2002 Page 1 of 2
IT IS THEREFORE THE ORDER OF THIS COURT that all

pending motions for abstention and remand are denied without

prejudice at this time with leave to renew at a later date. The

cases are administratively dismissed, subject to reinstatement

following the determination of the bankruptcy issues by Judge

Wolin and any subsequent appeals thereto.

Done this 9th day of August, 2002.

 BY THE COURT

 

Charles R. Weiner, SJ

Case 2:02-cv-04411-RB Document 4 Filed 08/09/2002 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:05-cv-02081-JS Document 307 Filed 06/29/11 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:04-cv-01692-MAM Document 1 Filed 04/19/04 Page 1 of 7
Case 2:04-cv-01692-MAM Document 1 Filed 04/19/04 Page 2 of 7
Case 2:04-cv-01692-MAM Document 1 Filed 04/19/04 Page 3 of 7
Case 2:04-cv-01692-MAM Document 1 Filed 04/19/04 Page 4 of 7
Case 2:04-cv-01692-MAM Document 1 Filed 04/19/04 Page 5 of 7
Case 2:04-cv-01692-MAM Document 1 Filed 04/19/04 Page 6 of 7
Case 2:04-cv-01692-MAM Document 1 Filed 04/19/04 Page 7 of 7
# May 2023
Second Amendment to Rights Agreement



 EXHIBIT 4.1B 
 SECOND AMENDMENT TO RIGHTS AGREEMENT 
 THIS AMENDMENT is entered into as of June 30, 2008, between
IMMUCELL CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), and American Stock Transfer & Trust Co., a New York corporation, as Rights Agent (the “Rights Agent”). 
 WHEREAS, the Company and the Rights Agent are parties to (i) a Rights Agreement dated as of September 5, 1995 (the “Rights
Agreement”), providing for the issuance of certain common stock purchase rights (the “Rights”) to holders of the Company’s outstanding Common Stock and (ii) an Amendment to Rights Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2005;

 WHEREAS, under Section 7(a) of the Rights Agreement, as so amended, the Rights terminate on or before the Final Expiration Date,
defined in Section 1(a) of the Rights Agreement to be September 19, 2008; and 
 WHEREAS, the Company’s Board of Directors has
determined that extending the Final Expiration Date for the Rights and increasing the ownership threshold for determining “Acquiring Person” status are in the best interests of the Company; 
 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual benefits arising herefrom, the parties hereto agree as follows: 
 1. FINAL EXPIRATION DATE. Section 1(i) of the Rights Agreement is hereby amended to read in its entirety as follows: 
 (i) “Final Expiration Date” shall mean the Close of Business on September 19, 2011. 
 2. ACQUIRING PERSON THRESHOLD. Sections 1(a) and 27(d) of the Rights Agreement are hereby amended such that the referenced ownership threshold for
determining “Acquiring Person” status is increased from 15% to 18%. 
 3. OTHER PROVISIONS. The “Summary of Rights to Purchase
Common Stock” (attached to the Rights Agreement as Exhibit B thereto) shall likewise be deemed amended to reflect the changes under Sections 1 and 2 above. In all other respects, the terms and provisions of the Rights Agreement are hereby
confirmed and shall remain in full force and effect, subject to the changes stated herein. 







 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly executed and attested, all
as of the date first above written. 
  

									
	Attest:	 		 	IMMUCELL CORPORATION
					
	By:	 	 /s/ Joseph H. Crabb
	 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Michael F. Brigham

		 	Joseph H. Crabb	 		 		 	Michael F. Brigham
		 	Vice President	 		 		 	President and Chief Executive Officer
			
	Attest:	 		 	AMERICAN STOCK TRANSFER & TRUST COMPANY
					
	By:	 	 /s/ Susan Silber
	 		 	By:	 	 /s/ Herbert J. Lemmer

		 	Susan Silber	 		 		 	Herbert J. Lemmer
		 	Assistant Secretary	 		 		 	Vice President
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

DUARTE BLAMO DAVIES

Petitioner,

v.

JOHN ASHCROFT, UNITED STATES

ATTORNEY GENERAL, ET AL.

Respondents.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-4459

WITHDRAWAL OF APPEARANCE

Kindly withdraw my appearance on behalf of the

Respondents in the above-captioned matter.

 

Susan R. Becker

Assistant United States Attorney

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

Kindly enter my appearance on behalf of Respondents in

the above-captioned matter. 

 

Sonya Fair Lawrence

Assistant United States Attorney 

615 Chestnut Street, Suite 1250 

Philadelphia, PA 19106

Tel: (215) 861-8921

Fax: (215) 861-8349

PA I.D. No. 81891 

Dated: September 23, 2002

Case 2:02-cv-04459-SD Document 12 Filed 09/23/2002 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this date I caused a true and

correct copy of the foregoing to be served by first-class United

States mail, postage prepaid, upon the following: 

Duarte Blamo Davies

A73 034 544 

Berks County Prison

1287 County Welfare Road

Leesport, PA 19533

Pro se

 

 

Sonya Fair Lawrence

Assistant United States Attorney

Dated: September 23, 2002

Case 2:02-cv-04459-SD Document 12 Filed 09/23/2002 Page 2 of 2
From: Raymond, Gabrielle <graymond@rti.org>

Sent: Monday, May 11, 2015 5:01 PM

To: 'gtayler@brick.com' <gtayler@brick.com>

Subject: Acme green brick testing results

Hello Mr. Tayler,

I am attaching a spreadsheet of the Acme facilities that provided green brick testing results to

EPA via BIA. I’ve added some columns at the end for the Name of Clay Deposit, Geological

Age of the Deposit, and Latitude/Longitude of the Clay Deposit. I know you were working on a

file to send to me, so if this ma kes it easier, you can fill out this spreadsheet, or continue with

your file. Whatever is easier for you, any information you are able to provide about the clay

deposits will be much appreciated and helpful!

Thank you for your help,

Gabrielle

Gabrielle Raymond

RTI International

3040 Cornwallis Road

P.O. Box 12194

Research Triangle Park, NC 27709

Phone: (919) 541

- 7015

<< Green Brick Testing Results

- 032515BIA

- to EPA May 4 2015_Acme.xlsx>>
IRC Handout 12-08-16

Proposed Changes for FY 2017 

Account Title: Repayment of Repayable Advances 

Account Number: 415900 

Normal Balance: Credit 

Definition: Amounts actually transferred by nonexpenditure transfer during the fiscal year to 

Advances to the Unemployment Trust Fund and Other Funds for repayment of repayable 

advances. This transaction is accomplished via a Nonexpenditure Transfer. This USSGL account 

is to be used by only the Department of Labor and Department of Health and Human Services.

Or Use only with Office of Management and Budget approval.

Justification: To modify the definition for Department of Health and Human Services.

Note, the above will be voted on in May 2017.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-1771

ROGER ELLIOTT, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, Defendant - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis III, District Judge. (CA-00-1553-A) Submitted: October 3, 2001 Decided: October 17, 2001 Before NIEMEYER and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.Roger Elliott, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Donald McGillicuddy, FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, Washington, D.C., for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Roger Elliott appeals the district court’s order granting the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporations’s motion to dismiss and for summary judgment as to Elliott’s petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board’s decision and on his claim of employment discrimination based on age, race, sex, and reprisal in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, 42 U.S.C.A. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record, the briefs, and the district court’s opinion rendered from the bench and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Elliott v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. , No. CA-00-1553-A (E.D. Va. filed May 11, 2001; entered May 17, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Order entered August 22, 2022

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-20-01118-CV

BRIGETTA D'OLIVIO, Appellant

V.

HILARY THOMPSON HUTSON, Appellee

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 2

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 002-02704-2020

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant Brigetta D’Olivio’s emergency motion for

ruling, in which she asks us to rule on the following motions: (1) emergency 

motion to reconsider the order denying appellant’s emergency motion to abate and 

(2) emergency motion for permission to extend time to file motion for rehearing

and motion for en banc reconsideration. The Court has ruled on these motions. 

Accordingly, we DENY the motion for ruling as moot.

/s/ ROBBIE PARTIDA-KIPNESS

JUSTICE
September 3, 1948

No. 52538.

protest 126467-K.

#### Philip Blum & Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

Plaintiff's application for rehearing granted.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS 

Appeal of --

Advanced Medical Partners, Inc. 

Under Contract No. 000000-00-0-0000 

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: 

ASBCA No. 60830 

Kimberly Gdula, Esq. 

Jackson Walker LLP 

Austin, TX 

Jeffrey P. Hildebrant, Esq. 

Deputy Chief Trial Attorney 

Christopher S. Cole, Esq. 

Senior Trial Attorney 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL 

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice. 

Dated: 25 October 2016 

dministrative Judge 

Armed Services Board 

of Contract Appeals 

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 60830, Appeal of Advanced Medical 

Partners, Inc., rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. 

Dated: 

JEFFREY D. GARDIN 

Recorder, Armed Services 

Board of Contract Appeals
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9

<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
     QUARTERLY  REPORT  ON FORM  10-QSB  AND IS  QUALIFIED  IN ITS  ENTIRETY  BY
     REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL INFORMATION.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                                       <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          1,879
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            367
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                    0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                    0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     6,219
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                              0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                0
<LOANS>                                        42,584
<ALLOWANCE>                                       404
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 53,868
<DEPOSITS>                                     42,476
<SHORT-TERM>                                    3,500
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               451
<LONG-TERM>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                           66
<OTHER-SE>                                      7,376
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 53,868
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                   954
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  99
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    6
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                1,059
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                576
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 41
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             442
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      15
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 (7)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   400
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    61
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         32
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                       32
<EPS-BASIC>                                       .07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .07
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   3.17
<LOANS-NON>                                       150
<LOANS-PAST>                                      401
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                     0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  389
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       0
<RECOVERIES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 404
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              404
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             0



</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 99-31


                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT



I, Daniel G. Brudzynski, Controller and Chief Financial Officer of The Detroit
Edison Securitization Funding LLC (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best
of my knowledge and belief:

(1)  the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the annual period ended
     December 31, 2002 (the "Report') fully complies with the requirements of
     Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
     78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:         March 20, 2003                  /s/ DANIEL G. BRUDZYNSKI
                                 -----------------------------------------------
                                                Daniel G. Brudzynski
                                     Controller and Chief Financial Officer of
                                   The Detroit Edison Securitization Funding LLC
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 2SUPPLEMENT 	&"Arial,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2021 ReportingSection VII  &"Arial,Regular"

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2021-07	&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000DRAFT&K000000 VII CER - &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout 12/3/20
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

STEVE ENRIQUE QUINTERO RIOS

,

Appellant

,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 1 7

- 00 0 45

- C R

Appeal from the

384 th District C ourt

of El Paso C ounty, Texas

(TC# 20150D04760 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the State’s third motion for extension of time within which to file

the b rief until April 5

, 201 8

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO

F ILE THE STATE ’S B R IEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. Jaime E. Esparza

, the State ’s attorney, prepare the

State ’s b rief and forward the same to this Court on or before April 5 , 201 8

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 20 th d ay of February , 20 1 8

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure , C.J., R odriguez and Palafox , JJ.
Exhibit
10.15


 


	
   

  	
   

  	
  

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  COUNTRYWIDE BANK, FSB

  8511 FALLBROOK AVE

  WH-51F

  WEST HILLS, CA 91304

  (800) 669-2955



  



 


 


June 25, 2008


 


Home Loan Center, Inc.


163 Technology Drive


Irvine, CA 92618


Attn: Rian Furey, Senior
Vice President


 


Re:          Spinoff of InterActive Corporation


 


Ladies and Gentlemen:


 


This
notice is issued in reference to that certain Transactions Terms Letter dated January 25,
2008 (the “Transactions Terms Letter”) and (b) that certain Master
Repurchase Agreement dated January 25, 2008 (the “Agreement”), both by and
between Countrywide Bank, FSB (“Buyer”) and Home Loan Center, Inc. (“Seller”)
(the Transactions Terms Letter and the Agreement, jointly, the “Repurchase
Agreement”). Capitalized terms used herein and not otherwise defined herein
shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Repurchase Agreement.


 


Pursuant to the “Term” section of the Transactions
Terms Letter, the Term of the Repurchase Agreement expires on the earlier of (a) January 24,
2009 or (b) 60 days prior to an initial public offering, reorganization,
spinoff or similar transaction involving InterActive Corporation. Seller has
notified Buyer of a pending spinoff involving InterActive Corporation and has
requested that the Term of the Repurchase
Transaction not expire as a result thereof. As an accommodation to Seller, Buyer hereby agrees that the Term of the
Repurchase Agreement shall not expire upon the occurrence of the spinoff of InterActive Corporation and Buyer
agrees to continue to enter into Transactions with Seller under the
Repurchase Agreement pursuant to its terms and conditions; provided, however, that if Buyer determines at any
time prior to January 24, 2009 that such spinoff materially and
adversely affects Seller, Buyer reserves the right to deem the Repurchase Agreement
expired prior to such date.


 


Sincerely,


 


 




	
  /s/ Richie Walia

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Richie Walia

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Senior Vice President
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-10 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 1 of 40
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-10 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 2 of 40
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-10 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 3 of 40
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-10 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 4 of 40
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-10 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 5 of 40
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-10 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 6 of 40
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-10 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 7 of 40
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-10 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 8 of 40
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-10 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 9 of 40
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-10 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 10 of 40
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-10 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 11 of 40
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-10 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 12 of 40
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-10 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 13 of 40
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-10 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 14 of 40
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-10 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 15 of 40
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-10 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 16 of 40
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-10 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 17 of 40
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-10 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 18 of 40
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-10 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 19 of 40
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-10 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 20 of 40
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-10 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 21 of 40
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-10 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 22 of 40
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-10 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 23 of 40
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-10 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 24 of 40
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-10 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 25 of 40
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-10 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 26 of 40
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-10 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 27 of 40
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-10 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 28 of 40
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-10 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 29 of 40
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-10 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 30 of 40
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-10 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 31 of 40
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-10 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 32 of 40
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-10 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 33 of 40
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-10 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 34 of 40
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-10 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 35 of 40
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-10 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 36 of 40
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-10 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 37 of 40
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-10 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 38 of 40
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-10 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 39 of 40
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 142-10 Filed 02/18/2005 Page 40 of 40
Before the Second Division,

May 16, 1962

No. 66762.

#### Engis Equipment Co. and J. E. Bernard & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 60/8038 (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of talyrond apparatus similar in all material respects to that the subject of Abstract 64440, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.