alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

WM HIGH YIELD FUND, et al. : CIVIL ACTION 

:

v. :

: No. 04-3423

MICHAEL A. O’HANLON, et al. :

ORDER 

AND NOW, this 27th day of June, 2013, upon consideration of the parties’ submissions,1

it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant Terry Cady’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No.

260) is GRANTED, and it is further ORDERED that JUDGMENT is entered in favor of

Defendant Cady and against Plaintiffs – WM High Yield Fund; WM Income Fund; WM VT

Income Fund; AT High Yield Fund; AT Income Fund; and Stellar Funding, Ltd. – on all claims

contained in the Complaint. 

BY THE COURT: 

/s/ Legrome D. Davis

Legrome D. Davis, J. 

Defendant Terry Cady’s submissions: Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 260), Statement 1

of Material Facts as to Which There Is No Genuine Issue for Trial (Doc. No. 260 at 4-8), Memorandum of

Law (Doc. No. 260 at 9-37), Declaration of Michael Viano, Jr. (Doc. No. 260-1) with Exhibits (Doc. Nos.

260-2 through 260-14), and Reply Brief (Doc. No. 282). Plaintiffs’ submissions: Plaintiffs’ Memorandum

of Law (Doc. No. 275), Counter-Statement of Undisputed Facts (Doc. No. 276), Declaration of James P.

McEvilly, III (Doc. No. 277) with Exhibits (Doc. Nos. 277-1 through 277-5).
No. 61771.

#### Hill Brown Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 309921-K (Norfolk).

*507Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise, facts, and issues are the same in all material respects as those the subject of *B. J. Saunders & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(37 Cust. Ct. 267, C. D. 1834), the collector was directed to reliquidate the entries, assessing duty upon the basis of the unit appraised value per conditioned pound or kilo, multiplied by the total number of conditioned pounds or kilos, as set forth in the invoices.
Exhibit 24

POWER OF ATTORNEY

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS:

WHEREAS, Agere Systems Inc., a Delaware corporation (hereinafter referred to as the "Company"), proposes to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, under the provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, an Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006; and

WHEREAS, the undersigned is a Director and/or Officer of the Company, as indicated below his or her signature:

NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned hereby constitutes and appoints Richard L. Clemmer and Peter Kelly and each of them, as attorneys for and in the name, place and stead of the undersigned, and in the capacity of the undersigned as a Director and/or Officer of the Company, as indicated, to execute and file such Form 10-K and any amendments or supplements thereto, hereby giving and granting to said attorneys, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing whatsoever requisite and necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully, to all intents and purposes, as the undersigned might or could do if personally present at the doing thereof, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys may or shall lawfully do, or cause to be done, by virtue hereof.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Power of Attorney this 24th day of October, 2006.

|By | /s/ Richard S. Hill        | By | /s/ Rae F. Sedel     
|-- | -------------------------- | -- | ---------------------
|   | Name:   Richard S. Hill    |    | Name:                
|   | Title:  Director           |    | Title:               
|   |                            |    |                      
|By | /s/ Michael J. Mancuso     | By | /s/ Harold A. Wagner 
|   | Name:   Michael J. Mancuso |    | Name:                
|   | Title:  Director           |    | Title:               
|   |                            |    |                      
|By | /s/ Arun Netravali         | By | /s/ Kari-Pekka Wilska
|   | Name:   Arun Netravali     |    | Name:                
|   | Title:  Director           |    | Title:               
|   |                            |    |                      
|By | /s/ Thomas P. Salice       |    |                      
|   | Name:   Thomas P. Salice   |    |                      
|   | Title:  Director           |    |                      

---
Exhibit 10.3

                                  HSBC Bank USA
                           99 High Street, 16th Floor
                                Boston, MA 02110

                                                 January 26, 2004

Mr. Michael Umana
Chief Financial Officer
Saucony, Inc.
13 Centennial Drive
Peabody, MA 01960

Re:  Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated August 30, 2002, by and between
     Saucony,  Inc. (the "Borrower"),  as borrower and, as successor in interest
     to State  Street Bank and Trust  Company,  HSBC Bank USA (the  "Bank"),  as
     agent for the  lenders  from time to time party  thereto (as  amended,  the
     "Credit Agreement")

Dear Michael:

The Borrower and the Bank hereby agree as follows:

1.   Section 9.8 of the Credit Agreement is hereby amended to state as follows:

     Section 9.8. Distributions. Make any Distribution or make any other payment
     on account of the purchase, acquisition, redemption, or other retirement of
     any shares of stock, whether now or hereafter  outstanding,  other than (i)
     cash dividends and repurchase or redemption of Borrower's capital stock not
     to exceed  $5,000,000  in the  aggregate  in any  fiscal  year and (ii) any
     Subsidiary may make a Distribution to the Borrower.

2.   Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in the Credit Agreement,
     in addition to any  Distributions  and other payments  permitted by Section
     9.8 of the Credit  Agreement,  Borrower  may pay a special,  one-time  cash
     dividend of up to $30,000,000 at any time on or before August 30, 2004.

     This Letter  Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts and by
the parties  hereto on separate  counterparts,  each of which  counterpart  when
executed and delivered  shall be an original,  but all of which  together  shall
constitute one and the same instrument.

     This Letter Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with
the laws of The Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

     The Borrower agrees that the Credit Agreement and all documents executed in
connection  therewith or pursuant  thereto remain in full force and effect after
giving effect to this Letter Agreement.

     Please  confirm that the  foregoing  correctly  sets forth our agreement by
signing and  returning  the  duplicate  copy of this Letter  Agreement  enclosed
herewith.

                                                Very truly yours,

                                                HSBC Bank USA

                                                By:   /s/  Patrick J. Doulin
                                                Name:    Patrick J. Doulin
                                                Title:   Senior Vice President


ACCEPTED AND AGREED:

SAUCONY, INC.

By:  /s/ Michael Umana
     Name:        Michael Umana
     Title:       Chief Financial Officer
# 198

&"Calibri,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2023-08	&"Arial,Bold"&10&KFF0000DRAFT&K01+000 VII EDR - &P      	&"Arial,Bold"&10IRC Handout 4/20/23

# 199

&"Calibri,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2023-08	&"Arial,Bold"&10&KFF0000DRAFT&K01+000 VII EDR - &P      	&"Arial,Bold"&10IRC Handout 4/20/23

# 200

&"Calibri,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2023-08	&"Arial,Bold"&10&KFF0000DRAFT&K01+000 VII EDR - &P      	&"Arial,Bold"&10IRC Handout 4/20/23
<PAGE>
                                                                      Exhibit 24
                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

                         INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY
                 Annual Report on Form lO-K for the Fiscal Year
                                      Ended
                                December 31, 1998


      The undersigned  directors of INDIANA  MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY,  an Indiana
corporation  (the "Company"),  do hereby  constitute and appoint E. LINN DRAPER,
JR.,   ARMANDO  A.  PENA  and  HENRY  W.   FAYNE,   and  each  of  them,   their
attorneys-in-fact  and agents,  to execute for them, and in their names,  and in
any and all of their capacities,  the Annual Report of the Company on Form lO-K,
pursuant to Section 13 of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,  for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 1998, and any and all  amendments  thereto,  and to file
the same, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith,
with   the   Securities   and   Exchange   Commission,    granting   unto   said
attorneys-in-fact  and agents,  and each of them, full power and authority to do
and perform  every act and thing  required or necessary to be done,  as fully to
all intents and purposes as the undersigned might or could do in person,  hereby
ratifying and confirming all that said  attorneys-in-fact  and agents, or any of
them, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

      IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the undersigned have signed these presents this 24th
day of February, 1999.


  /s/ Karl G. Boyd                    /s/ James J. Markowsky
Karl G. Boyd                        James J. Markowsky


  /s/ C. R. Boyle, III                /s/ Armando A. Pena
C. R. Boyle, III                          Armando A. Pena


  /s/ G. A. Clark                     /s/ D. B. Synowiec
G. A. Clark                         D. B. Synowiec


  /s/ E. Linn Draper, Jr.             /s/ J. H. Vipperman
E. Linn Draper, Jr.                 J. H. Vipperman


  /s/ Henry W. Fayne                  /s/ W. E. Walters
Henry W. Fayne                      W. E. Walters

  /s/  James A. Kobyra                /s/ E. H. Wittkamper
James A. Kobyra                     E. H. Wittkamper


  /s/ Wm. J. Lhota
Wm. J. Lhota
DRAFT

ID

Simple or

Special Name Type Description Error Message 

106 SPECIAL

Restricted Use of USSGL 413700 with BEA "D" and PYA "P" Compound

Reporting USSGL account 413700 with BEA Category Indicator "D" and Prior Year Adjustment Code "P" is restricted to specific TAS.

TAS is not permitted to report USSGL 4Category Indicator "D" and Prior Year A

U.S. Standard General Ledger

Data Validations - Summary

Part 2SUPPLEMENT

Bulletin No. 2020-10 DRAFT VII VSR - 1
No. 59973.

#### Federated Dept. Stores, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 266147-K (Boston).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silk squares similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United, States*v. *The Specialty House, Inc., Bryant & Heffernan, Inc., et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 136, C. A. D. 585), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Page 1 of 1 IRC Handout February 13, 2020 

Proposed FY 2020 Changes to Transaction Codes (TCs) with References to the 

Central Accounting Reporting System (CARS): 

1) Proposed Modification to TC Name to reference the CARS CTA Module. 

A210 To record a transfer-out of financing sources and fund balance from Custodial Statement 

collections via the Statement of Transactions (224). CARS CTA Module.

Comment: See USSGL TC C142. 

Budgetary Entry 

None 

Proprietary Entry 

Debit 599800 Custodial Collections Transferred Out to a Treasury Account Symbol 

Other Than the General Fund of the U.S. Government 

 Credit 101000 Fund Balance With Treasury 

Justification: The CARS CTA Module is now the mechanism for CARS-Reporting federal 

agencies to reclassify transactions by TAS/BETC.

2) Proposed Modification to TC Comments to reference the CARS CTA Module. 

A250, A251, B150, B152, B154, C750, C751, C752, C753, C754, and C755. 

Comment: See Treasury Financial Manual, Volume 1, Part 2, Chapter 3400, “Accounting for 

and Reporting on Cash and Investments Held Outside of the U.S. Treasury,” and Volume 1, Part 

2, Chapter 5100, “Fund Balance with Treasury Accounts” for additional guidance, such as 

Statement of Transactions (224) transactions. reclassifications in the CARS CTA module.

Justification: The CARS CTA Module is now the mechanism for CARS-Reporting federal 

agencies to reclassify transactions by TAS/BETC.
Before the Third Division,

June 29, 1944

No. 49590.

#### Protests 90560-K/91131, etc., of Davies, Turner & Co. et al. (Chicago).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

At the trial the importer testified, among other things, that when he received the drums they were in bad condition, being knotted and leaking. He further stated that he had never been able to sell any of the drums and threw them away. He admitted that he ruined the drums for any other purpose by cutting off the heads. The Government examiner testified that he examined one drum out of each entry and found it not leaking and having only minor dents, and that in his opinion the drums so examined were capable of continued use. From the evidence the court was unable to find anything to establish that the plaintiff had seen the drums before their arrival at his place of business, or that they were dented and leaking and unfit for purposes as containers at the time of arrival of the merchandise. The evidence showed that the cutting off of the heads of the drums or slits in the heads in order to remove the contents was motivated because of the opinion of the importer that the drums would not be worth anything aftei: being emptied, rather than because such mode of removal would facilitate the emptying of the drums. On the record presented the court was of the opinion that the drums in question are not entitled to free entry as usual containers of specific duty goods, and that they were properly assessed under paragraph 328 in the absence of any. proof that the drums were of American manufacture. The protests were therefore overruled. •
October 24, 1960

No. 64821.

Suit 5019.

#### George D. Spiers, doing business as The Payne-Spiers Studios *v.*United States (George L. Payne, Party in Interest).

C.D. 2119 affirmed July 6, 1960. C.A.D. 742.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Report”) of I.D. Systems,
Inc. (the “Corporation”) for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Ned Mavrommatis, Chief
Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge,
that:





(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation.




Dated: March 31, 2010
                /s/
      Ned MavrommatisName:
      Ned MavrommatisTitle:
      Chief Financial Officer





The
foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63
of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report or
as a separate disclosure document.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to the Corporation and will be retained by the
Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

 

IN RE: DIET DRUGS (Phentermine/ :

Fenfluramine/Dexfenfluramine) : MDL DOCKET NO. 1203

PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION :

:

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: :

-----------------------------------:

MARTINEZ, et al. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-20135

v. :

WYETH, et al. : 

:

:

MELDER, et al. :

v. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-20135

WYETH, et al. :

:

PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 

AND NOW, this day of August, 2004, it is hereby

ORDERED that:

(1) Report and Recommendation No. 13 of Special

Discovery Master (as to Wyeth's Motion to Strike in the Martinez

and Melder Matters) is hereby AFFIRMED; 

(2) Wyeth's motion to strike in the Martinez and Melder

Matters (Doc. No. 204553) is DENIED; 

(3) Plaintiffs' counsel will be sanctioned for failure

to comply with Rule 16(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure

in an amount to be determined by the court after reviewing the

submission by Wyeth of an affidavit detailing the hourly billing

rates and time spent in an attempt to obtain Rule 26 compliant

expert reports for these plaintiffs, including time spent

Case 2:02-cv-20135-HB Document 15 Filed 08/27/2004 Page 1 of 2
-2-

preparing the motion to strike plaintiffs Marilyn Melder's and

Peggy Martinez's Expert Witnesses; 

(4) Wyeth shall submit an affidavit detailing the

hourly billing rates and time spent in an attempt to obtain Rule

26 compliant expert reports for these plaintiffs, including time

spent preparing the motion to strike plaintiffs Marilyn Melder's

and Peggy Martinez's Expert Witnesses; and

(5) Plaintiff Martinez shall supplement her expert

report in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26

within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order.

BY THE COURT:

______________________________

J.

Case 2:02-cv-20135-HB Document 15 Filed 08/27/2004 Page 2 of 2
Part 1

SUPPLEMENT

DRAFT 

No Name Description Rule Attribute Combination

32E

Is First Year and Year of Budget Authority Indicator Validation

If Is First Year is Y, then Year of BA must be NEW. If Is First Year is N, then Year of BA must be BAL for annual & multiyear TAS when using PYA of X, and can be NEW or BAL for X year TAS and for annual & multiyear TAS when using PYA B or P.

YEAR OF 

BUDGET 

AUTHORITY 

CODE IS FIRST YEAR

CONCATENATE

D TAS

Pass BAL Y

33920172017 

1400000

Pass NEW N

57920102019 

8299000

Pass NEW N

08920162017 

0228000

Pass NEW N

08920162017 

0243000

Pass NEW N

08920162017 

0251000

Pass NEW N

08920162017 

0318000

Pass NEW N

08920162017 

0321000

Pass NEW N

08920162017 

0337000

Pass NEW N

07520162016 

0344000

U.S. Standard General Ledger

Data Validations - Detail

Draft Bulletin No. 2017-07 VII VSR - 1
Case No. 9,741.

#### MOODIE v. The AMITY.

[Bee, 89.] 1

District Court, D. South Carolina.

1796.

Admiualtt — Prize Capture — Sale by Captor on Land.

Sale on land in the ports of the United States cannot be prevented by their courts of admiralty, in cases of lawful capture on the high seas, by French privateers duly commissioned.

[This was a libel by Benjamin Moodie, British consul, against the ship Amity and Isaac Hammond.)

1

 [Reported by Hon. Thomas Bee, District Judge.]

BEE, District Judge.

This case is one of a new impression. The libel admits the capture of the Amity on the high seas, by a vessel under the flag of the French republic. There is no allegation that this vessel has been fitted, or her force increased within the United States, contrary to the laws of neutrality. It is not alleged that the prize was captured within the jurisdictional limits of the United States. Upon these grounds alone has this court assumed jurisdiction, in cases, of capture by French privateers, where the prizes have been brought infra praesidia of this country. In all other cases the 17th article of the treaty with France is conclusive upon the subject of their prizes brought into our ports; and the point has been fully settled by several appeals to the supreme court, of this country. The only allegation in the libel, on which to found a claim for the interference of the court, is a sale of the prize on land, as being contrary to the 24th article of the treaty with Great Britain. In support of this it is contended that by the 9th section of the judiciary act [1 Stat. 76), this court has jurisdiction in all cases arising on the high seas, of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction. That the original capture having been on the high seas, the court has cognizance of the original question, and, therefore of all its consequences; of which this intended sale is one. That the third article of the constitution of the United States extends the judicial power to all cases arising under treaties made, or to be made. This court has cognizance of all such points of admiralty and maritime nature, provided they may be judged of by any court of the United- States. *651But the treaty with France excludes all jurisdiction-on our part, in cases like the present. The commission under which this prize was made, has been exhibited in court, as that treaty provides. It is unobjectionable; and the two grounds before mentioned have not, nor can be, taken. I have, therefore, no authority over the original question in this cause, and none over any of its consequences. As to the cases from Dougl. 5S2, 583, they do not apply here. 1 am clearly of opinion that this court has no jurisdiction in this instance; and I dismiss the libel with costs.
Exhibit 32.2


 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63
                      OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE


I,  Ernest  J.  Mrozek,  the  President  and  Chief  Financial  Officer  of  The
ServiceMaster  Company,  certify that (i) the Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended June 30, 2004,  fully  complies with  requirements  of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the  information
contained  in such Form 10-Q fairly  presents,  in all  material  respects,  the
financial condition and results of operations of The ServiceMaster Company.




                                /S/ ERNEST J. MROZEK
                                ---------------------
                                Ernest J. Mrozek
                                President and Chief Financial Officer
                                August 9, 2004


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to The ServiceMaster  Company and will be retained by The ServiceMaster
Company and  furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its staff
upon request.







                                       30
<PAGE>