alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 35 (Thursday, February 22, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 8028]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-2915]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice (07-012)]


Government-Owned Inventions, Available for Licensing

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of availability of inventions for licensing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The invention listed below is assigned to the National 
Aeronautics and Space Administration, is the subject of a patent 
application that has been filed in the United States Patent and 
Trademark Office, and is available for licensing.

DATES: February 22, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mark W. Homer, Patent Counsel, NASA 
Management Office--JPL, 4800 Oak Grove Drive, Mail Stop 180-200, 
Pasadena, CA 91109; telephone (818) 354-7770.
    NASA Case No. NPO-42563-1-CU: Underwater Vehicle Propulsion and 
Power Generation; NASA Case No. NPO-42221-1-CU: White-Light Whispering 
Gallery Mode Optical Resonator System and Method; NASA Case No. NPO-
41446-1-CU: Self-Configurable Radio Receiver; NASA Case No. DRC-006-
005: Propulsion Controlled Aircraft Computer (PCAC); NASA Case No. DRC-
006-006: Sensor-Based Management for Secured Inventories; NASA Case No. 
DRC 006-024: Method for Real-Time Structure Shape-Sensing.

    Dated: February 9, 2007.
Keith T. Sefton,
Deputy General Counsel, Administration and Management.
[FR Doc. E7-2915 Filed 2-21-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-13-P
385632_1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

 

MARA FLAMM, : CIVIL ACTION

:

Plaintiff, :

: NO. 02-4302

v. :

:

SARNER & ASSOCIATES, P.C. and :

JOSHUA SARNER, ESQUIRE and :

LEONARD SARNER, ESQUIRE and :

JODI H. BROWN, M.D. and JOHN :

MATUSAVAGE, :

:

Defendants. :

 

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

TO THE PROTHONOTARY:

Kindly enter our appearance in the above-captioned matter on behalf of defendants,

Sarner & Associates, P.C.; Joshua Sarner, Esquire and Leonard Sarner, Esquire.

CHRISTIE, PABARUE, MORTENSEN and YOUNG

A Professional Corporation

By: 

JAMES W. CHRISTIE, ESQUIRE (I.D. No. 12068)

WILLIAM F. MCDEVITT, ESQUIRE (I.D. No.: 80206)

1880 JFK Blvd., 10th Floor

Philadelphia, PA 19103

(215) 587-1678

Attorneys for Defendants,

Sarner & Associates, P.C.;

Joshua Sarner, Esquire and

Leonard Sarner, Esquire

Dated: July 24, 2002

Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 5 Filed 07/24/2002 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that true and correct copies of the foregoing Entry of Appearance

were served today via first class mail to all counsel of record at the addresses listed

below:

Robert P. Brand, Esquire

1200 Walnut Street, 5th Floor

Philadelphia, PA 19107

Anthony Baratta, Esquire

Baratta & Russell, P.C.

The Loft at Mount Jolly

2661 Huntingdon Pike

Huntingdon Valley, PA 19006

 

JAMES W. CHRISTIE

Dated: July 24, 2002 

Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 5 Filed 07/24/2002 Page 2 of 2
Before the First Division,

December 20, 1961

No. 66297.

#### F. W. Myers & Co., Inc., for a/c Ayerst Laboratories, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 68/83, etc. (Ogdensburg).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of “5-Ethyl-5-phenyl-hexahydropyrimidine-4:6-dione,” the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 122

Note 16. Benefits Due and Payable

Benefits Due and Payable as of September 30, 2021, and 2020

(In billions of dollars) 2021 2020

Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance - SSA................................................................ 87.4................................ 83.7 ...............

Grants to states for Medicaid - HHS ................................................................................................ 52.7 ................................ 45.8 .

Federal Supplementary Medical Insurance (Medicare Parts B and D) - HHS................................ 43.8 ................................ 39.4 .......

Federal Hospital Insurance (Medicare Part A) - HHS................................................................ 35.9 ................................ 30.8 .........

Federal Disability Insurance - SSA ................................................................................................ 20.5 ................................ 21.4 ...

Unemployment Insurance - DOL ................................................................................................ 19.2 ................................ 16.5 ......

All other benefits programs ................................................................................................ 14.4................................ 18.7 ..............

Total benefits due and payable................................................................................................ 273.9 ................................ 256.3 ......

Benefits due and payable are amounts owed to program recipients or medical service providers as of September 30 that

have not been paid. Please refer to the financial statements of HHS, SSA, and DOL for more information.
No. 52942.

#### Balfour-Guthrie & Co., Ltd., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 959739-G, etc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained. The protests were overruled in all other respects.
February 14, 1946

No. 50895.

C. D. 974.

#### Protest 105437-K of L. A. Importing House.

Motion of Government for rehearing granted.
No. 50000.

#### Protests 888947-G, etc., of S. Schapiro & Sons et al. (Baltimore, etc.).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 1SUPPLEMENT&"Arial,Regular"	&"Arial,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT 	&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2018 ReportingSection VII  &"Arial,Regular"

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2019-02	&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000DRAFT&K000000 VII VDR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout 12/4/18
No. 60772.

#### Manca, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 254746-K (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of “Micro Ring Illuminators and Micro Camera Attachments” and that the issue is the same in all material respects as that the subject of *United States*v. *E. Leitz, Inc.*(24 C. C. P. A. 139, T. D. 48622), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
IRC Handout Draft December 3, 2020

Reciprocal Category 37 Update

Impact On Attribute Table (FY 2021)

No. USSGL Account Title Anticipated Budg/ 

Prop

Norm 

Bal

Begin

/End

Debit/ 

Credit

Auth 

Type 

Code

Apport 

Cat

Apport 

Cat B

579000 Other Financing Sources N P C E D/C

Avail 

Time

BEA Cat Borrow 

Source

Budgetary

Impact 

Indicator

Cohort 

Yr

Cust/ 

Noncust

Exch/ 

Nonexch

Fed/ 

Non 

Fed

Trading 

Ptnr

Trading 

Ptnr Main

PY

Adj

Program 

Indicator

D/E G/Z ### ####

 

Program 

Rpt Cat

Reimb 

Flag

Year

of 

BA

Reduction 

Type Fund Type

Reporting 

Type 

Code

Financing

Account 

Code

TAS

Status

Trans. 

Code

CF/DF/EC/EG/EM/EP/ER/ES/ET/GA/MR/TR/UG/US/

UT

E/F/U D/G/N U/E X/K/N
IRC Handout Draft December 3, 2020

Impact on Crosswalks (FY 2021)

Part 2 Fiscal Year 2021 Reporting

SUPPLEMENT Section VI

USSGL Crosswalk - Reclassified Statement Of Operations and Changes in Net Position

Line 

No.

USSGL 

Acct. USSGL Account Title

Begin/ 

End

Fed/ 

NonFed

Exch/ 

Nonexch

Budgetary 

Impact 

Indicator

Reporting 

Type Code

Addl. 

Info.

8.6 Other non-budgetary financing sources for debt accruals/amortization (RC 37) - Footnote 1

8.6 579000 Other Financing Sources E G U

8.6 579001 Other Non-Budgetary Financing Sources for Debt Accruals/Amortization E G U

Impact on Appendix 3 of TFM Chapter 2-4700 (FY 2021)

Table 6: Eliminations Summary for General Fund Transactions

Category Name/

Sub-Category Name

Reciprocal Category 

Pairing of Eliminating Accounts for General Fund Transactions

Federal Entity 1–Reporting Entity Federal Entity 2–General Fund

USSGL Account USSGL Account Title

USSGL 

Account USSGL Account Title

General Fund 

Transactions/

Other GF Financing 

Sources

37

Other Financing 

Sources–General Fund

579000G(099)

579001G(099)

Other Financing Sources

Other Non-Budgetary 

Financing Sources for 

Debt Accruals/ 

Amortization

579010F(XXX) Other General Fund 

Financing Sources
1 The three civil actions filed by plaintiff were as

follows: 1) Civil Action No. 95-3769 was dismissed as frivolous

by order of this Court filed June 26, 1995; 2) Civil Action No.

94-5473 was dismissed as frivolous by order of this Court filed

September 22, 1994, and 3) Civil Action No. 93-6822 was dismissed

as frivolous by order of this Court filed December 23, 1993. 

 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MR. MELVIN HARRIS : CIVIL ACTION

 :

 v. :

 :

COLEMAN HALL, et al. : NO. 05-4882

M E M O R A N D U M

BRODY, J. SEPTEMBER , 2005

Plaintiff, an inmate, is seeking to bring a pro se 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983 civil rights action without prepayment of fees. He is

alleging that the defendants discriminated against him, and that he

is illegally incarcerated. 

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), a prisoner who on three or

more prior occasions while incarcerated has filed an action in a

federal court that was dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or for

failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, must be

denied in forma pauperis status unless he is in imminent danger of

serious physical injury at the time that the complaint is filed.

Abdul-Akbar v. McKelvie, 239 F.3d 307 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, 533

U.S. 953 (2001). 

Plaintiff has, prior to the instant action, filed three civil

actions in a federal court which were dismissed as frivolous.1

Furthermore, nothing in this complaint suggests that plaintiff is

in imminent danger of serious physical injury. Accordingly,

Case 2:05-cv-04882-AB Document 2 Filed 09/21/05 Page 1 of 4
plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis will be denied. 

Case 2:05-cv-04882-AB Document 2 Filed 09/21/05 Page 2 of 4
 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MR. MELVIN HARRIS : CIVIL ACTION

 :

 v. :

 :

COLEMAN HALL, et al. : NO. 05-4882

O R D E R

AND NOW, to wit, this day of September, 2005, in

accordance with the accompanying memorandum, IT IS ORDERED that

plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

BY THE COURT:

S/ ANITA B. BRODY, J. 

 

Case 2:05-cv-04882-AB Document 2 Filed 09/21/05 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:05-cv-04882-AB Document 2 Filed 09/21/05 Page 4 of 4
No. 66772.

#### Agency Tile Supply Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 60/18818 (New York).

Opinion .by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of cylinder, enamel, or opal glass tiles and tiling, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

KAHAN CHIROPRACTIC CENTER : CIVIL ACTION

v. :

AETNA U.S. HEALTHCARE : NO. 02-4390

O R D E R

AND NOW, TO WIT: this 27th day of August, 2002,, it having been reported that

the issues between the parties in the above action have been settled and upon Order of the Court

pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1(b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is

ORDERED that the above action is DISMISSED with prejudice, pursuant to

agreement of counsel without costs.

MICHAEL E. KUNZ, Clerk of Court

BY: 

 Charles J. Ervin, Deputy Clerk

Case 2:02-cv-04390-TON Document 4 Filed 08/27/2002 Page 1 of 1
# attribtable--OUTPUT

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2022-16	&"Arial,Bold"&9Draft	&"Arial,Bold"&10August 2022 IRC Meeting Handout
# sec5_sbr_2018

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2019-02	&"Arial,Bold"&10V SBR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"&10IRC Handout December 4, 2018
Before the First Division,

October 17, 1947

No. 51959.

#### China Overseas, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 66167-K, etc. (New York).

*150Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

At the trial it was agreed between counsel for the respective parties that the merchandise is not composed wholly or in part of galalith; that it is composed wholly of synthetic resin and synthetic resin is not a binding agent in the merchandise in question; and that synthetic resin is not similar to galalith either in material, quality, texture, or the use to which it may be applied. Upon the record presented it was held that the involved merchandise is properly dutiable at 20 percent under paragraph 1558 as claimed. (Abstracts 45795 and 49907 followed.)
No. 63020.

#### Nurserymen’s Exchange *v.*United States,

protests 58/5037, etc. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of tree fern totem poles similar in all material respects to those the subject of *'Nurserymen’s Exchange*v. *United States*(41 Cust. Ct. 223, C.D. 2044), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, W. Barry Gilbert, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ending September
30, 2006 for IEC Electronics Corp.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial
information included in this report fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15 d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and,

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.


Dated:  November 16, 2006                   /s/ W. Barry Gilbert
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            W. Barry Gilbert
                                            Chairman and
                                            Chief Executive Officer
**AD Economic Evaluation**



### Docket No . FAA - 20 15 - 3658 Directorate ID : 2014 - SW - 039 -AD Helicopter Model: 369A (Army OH - 6A), 369H, 369HE, 369HM, 369HS, 369D, 369E, 369F, 369FF, and 500N . Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 8 33 Helicopters in the US Registry. Reason : The actions of this AD are intended to detect and correct routing of the fuel pump wiring to prevent interference with the fuel quantity sensor float, an erroneous fuel quantity indication in the cockpit, and subs equent fuel exhaustion and emergency landing. Costs : Parts per Helicopter $ 20 Labor per Helicopter ( 3 work hours X $85 for inspecting the fuel pump wiring routing and installing a decal.) $ 265

Other (Explain) Total Cost per Helicopter $275 Total US Fleet Cost $229,075 Executive Order 12866 : Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No (  ) DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures : Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No (  ) Regulatory Flexibility Act : Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Yes ( ) No (  ) Project Engineer : Fname Lname
# Main

&"Arial,Bold"Part 1SUPPLEMENT		&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2017 ReportingSection VI

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2017-06	&"Arial,Bold"VI RBS - &PDRAFT	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout 04 /20/17

# Footnotes and Additional Inform

&"Arial,Bold"Part 1SUPPLEMENT		&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2017 ReportingSection VI

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2017-06	&"Arial,Bold"VI RBS - &PDRAFT	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout 04/20/17
-                          Home                     
-                          Data Products                     
-                     Adoption of Genetically Engineered Crops in the U.S.                

# Adoption of Genetically Engineered Crops in the U.S.

This data product summarizes the adoption of herbicide-tolerant and insect-resistant corn, cotton, and soybeans. The tables below provide data obtained by USDA's National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS) in the *June Agricultural Survey* for 2000–24. USDA, Economic Research Service does not modify the data published in the annual NASS *Acreage* report.

USDA does not collect or disseminate information about global genetically engineered (GE) seed use. However, the International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications (ISAAA) does produce estimates of global GE acreage in their brief, *Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2019*, which is available on the ISAAA website along with other resources.

See more on recent trends in GE adoption, and documentation to the data.

- Overview
- Recent Trends in GE Adoption
- Documentation

-  Biotechnology 
-  Farm Practices & Management 
-  Natural Resources & Environment 
-  Cotton and Wool 
-  Agricultural Research and Productivity 
-  Land Use, Land Value & Tenure 
-  Crop & Livestock Practices 
-  Climate Change 
-  Organic Agriculture 
-  Farm Economy 

**Last updated:** Friday, July 26, 2024

**For more information, contact:**Laura  Dodson
Pursuant to5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 , th e court has determined that this opinionsho uld not * be publishe d an d is not precede nt except und er the limit ed circu mstance s set forth in 5 T H C IR . R. 47.5 .4. 

### INTHE UNI TED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHE FIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 08- 40941 C onfer enc e Cal endar UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA P l ai n t i f f
- A pp el l ee v. ERI CK F RANCI S CO CI ENFUEGOS- BARRA Z A D e fe nda nt - Appe l l ant A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or t h e S ou t h ern D i st ri ctof T exas U SD C N o. 1: 08- C R - 546- 1 B ef ore JO N E S , C h i ef

Ju dg e, an d JO L L Yan d E L R O D , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R I A M: * T h e F ederalP u bl i c D efen der ap p o in ted to r epresent E ri ck F ran ci sco C i en f u egos- B arraza ( C i en f u egos) ha s m oved f

or l eave t o w i t h draw an d h as f i l ed a br i e f i n a c c o r da nc e w i t h A n d er s v . C a lif o rn ia , 386 U . S . 738 ( 196 7) . C i en f u egos h a s n o tfi le d a r e s p o n s e . O u rin d e p e n d e n tr e v ie w o f t h e r e c o r d a n d c o u n s e l’s bri ef di s c l o s e s no n on f

rivol ou s i ssue f

or app eal . A ccor di n gl y, coun sel ’ s m ot i on f or l eave t o w i t h draw i s G R A N T E D , coun seli s excused f rom f u rt h er r espon sibi l i t i es h e r e in , a n d th e A P P E A L IS D IS M IS S E D . S ee5 T H C IR . R. 42. 2. United States Court of App eals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D April 30, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I Clerk
Part 2

SUPPLEMENT

Line 

No.

USSGL 

Acct. USSGL Account Title

Begin/ 

End

Fed/ 

NonFed Fund Type

Reporting 

Type Code

Addl. 

Info.

7

7.1

7.1 211000 Accounts Payable E F CF/DF/EC/EG/EM/EP/ER/ES/ET/GA/MR/TR/UG/US/UT E/U

7.1 212000 Disbursements in Transit E F CF/DF/EC/EG/EM/EP/ER/ES/ET/GA/TR/UG/US/UT E/U

7.1 213000 Contract Holdbacks E F CF/DF/EC/EG/EM/EP/ER/ES/ET/GA/TR/UG/US/UT E/U

7.1 217000 Subsidy Payable to the Financing Account E F CF/DF/EC/EG/EM/EP/ER/ES/ET/GA/TR/UG/US/UT E/U

7.1 219000 Other Liabilities With Related Budgetary Obligations E F CF/DF/EC/EG/EM/EP/ER/ES/ET/GA/TR/UG/US/UT E/U

7.1 294000 Capital Lease Liability E F CF/DF/EC/EG/EM/EP/ER/ES/ET/GA/TR/UG/US/UT E/U

7.1 296000 Accounts Payable From Canceled Appropriations E F EC/EG/EM/EP/ER/ES/ET/GA/TR E/U

7.1 299000 Other Liabilities Without Related Budgetary Obligations E F CF/DF/EC/EG/EM/EP/ER/ES/ET/MR/TR/UG/US/UT E/U

7.1 299100 Other Liabilities - Reductions E F EC/EG/EM/EP/ER/ES/ET/TR E/U

7.7

7.7 215000 Payable for Transfers of Currently Invested Balances E F CF/DF/EC/EG/EM/EP/ER/ES/ET/GA/TR/UG/US/UT E/U 7

7.7 215500 Expenditure Transfers Payable E F CF/DF/EC/EG/EM/EP/ER/ES/ET/GA/TR/UG/US/UT E/U 7

7.7 299100 Other Liabilities - Reductions E F EC/EG/EM/EP/ER/ES/ET/TR E/U

7.7 299200 Appropriated Dedicated Collections Liability E F ES/ET/US/UT E/U

Transfers payable (RC 27)/1

Federal

Accounts payable (RC 22)/1

Section VI

USSGL Crosswalk - Reclassified Balance Sheet

Fiscal Year 2019 Reporting

Bulletin No. 2018-08 VI RBS - 1 August 2018
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-40013

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

LUIS ARMANDO LOPEZ-SANDOVAL,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:16-CR-653-1

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Luis Armando 

Lopez-Sandoval has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in 

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Lopez-Sandoval has not filed a 

response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the 

record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal 

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

August 18, 2017

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 17-40013 Document: 00514122892 Page: 1 Date Filed: 08/18/2017
No. 17-40013

2

presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s 

motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further 

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

 Case: 17-40013 Document: 00514122892 Page: 2 Date Filed: 08/18/2017