alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### EPA Public Hearing

Hello, I am Curt Huber, the Executive Director of the American Lung Association in Colorado and I want to thank you for taking the time to hold two days of public comments on the carbon pollution standards. As the American Lung Association in Colorado Executive Director I am not an expert on coal fired plant operations but do know that the pollution generated by power plants makes people sick and can cut lives short. We know that ozone and particulate matter pollution cause difficulty breathing, asthma attacks and premature deaths. Ozone pollution has been linked to limiting the growth of lung function in children — a serious concern given that 80 percent of a child's lung develops after he is born. Actions that cut carbon pollution to meet the goals under the plan would prevent up to 4,100 premature deaths and 100,000 asthma attacks in children in 2020 and prevent up to 6,600 premature deaths and 150,000 asthma attacks in children in 2030. The American Lung Association is committed to fighting carbon pollution because it helps us save lives and improve lung health. I personally do not have a lung disease but as a person who enjoys taking long hikes for exercise purposes I do not enjoy poisoning myself with ozone smog and particle pollution while enjoying a hike. I consider myself to be a pretty healthy person so if I can be at risk so can millions or other people who are just as healthy, or have a chronic disease, or who are elderly, or very young, or who live nearer to a coal fired power plants. We urge the Environmental Protection Agency to set a final plan within a year that proved the strongest limits on carbon pollution. Anything less short changes our future, our health and our children.

Thank you. Curt Huber Executive Director American Lung Association in Colorado (303) 847-0266 CHuber@lungs.org
No. 63040.

#### Plus Computing Machines, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 58/3510, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” consist of key-driven calculating machines and parts thereof the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Plus Computing Machines, Inc.*v. *United States*(44 C.C.P.A. 160, C.A.D. 655), the claim at 12% percent under the provision in paragraph 372, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 52739), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T.D. 52763), for calculating machines specially constructed for multiplying and dividing and parts thereof was sustained as to said items. The items marked “B,” stipulated to be the same in all material respects as the merchandise the subject of C.A.D. 655, *supra,*except for having, in addition, an electric motor as an essential feature, were held dutiable at 12% percent under the provision in paragraph 353, as modified by T.D. 52739, supplemented by T.D. 52763, *supra,*for calculating machines specially constructed for multiplying and dividing, having an electric motor as an essential feature and parts thereof.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

 

 

FELIX D. WHITTINGTON,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

DONALD VAUGHN, et al.,

 Defendants.

 CIVIL ACTION

 NO. 02-4346

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 18th day of September, 2002, it is hereby ORDERED that the

attached communication dated September 2, 2002, shall be filed by the Clerk.

BY THE COURT:

 

_______________________________________

MARVIN KATZ, S.J.

Case 2:02-cv-04346-MK Document 22 Filed 09/18/2002 Page 1 of 1
# sec5_snc_2019

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2019-02	&"Arial,Bold"&10V SNC - &P	&"Arial,Bold"&10December 2018
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 21.1

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Subsidiary                                                         Jurisdiction
----------                                                         ------------
<S>                                                                <C>
CTI Services, Inc.                                                 Tennessee
Advanced Crystal Technology, Inc. d/b/a ACT, Inc.                  Tennessee
P.E.T.Net Pharmaceuticals, Inc.                                    Tennessee
The Colorado Medical Cyclotron, LLC                                Colorado
New England PETNet Manufacturing & Distribution Center, LLC        Massachusetts
PET/Net Pharmalogic, LLC                                           Tennessee
PETNet Indiana, LLC                                                Indiana
PETNet Houston, LLC                                                Texas
CTI Pet Systems, Inc. d/b/a CPS Innovations                        Tennessee
CTI, GmbH                                                          Germany
Monrol Izotop Servisi Anonim Sirketi                               Turkey
CTI (The Power Behind Pet) Ltd.                                    Hong Kong
</TABLE>
----

----

I Informace

Komise

----

Sdělení Komise v rámci zavádění směrnice Evropského parlamentu a Rady1999/5/ES ze dne 9. března 1999 o rádiových zařízeních a telekomunikačních koncových zařízeních a vzájemném uznávání jejich shody

(2006/C 201/01)

(Text s významem pro EHP)

(Uveřejnění názvů a označení harmonizovaných norem vztahujících se ke směrnici)

Příklad: U EN 60215:1989 platí:

Poznámka:

----

(1)

----

----

Sdělení Komise v rámci provádění směrnice Rady 89/336/EHS ze dne 3. května 1989 o sbližování právních předpisů členských států týkajících se elektromagnetické kompatibility

(2006/C 201/02)

(Text s významem pro EHP)

(Uveřejnění názvů a označení harmonizovaných norem vztahujících se ke směrnici)

Všeobecná poznámka: pokud je ve sloupci 3 spojovník (odkaz na nahrazovanou normu), znamená to, že příslušná norma nemůže být použita pro účely EMC beze změny nebo bez zvláštní části.

Příklad: U EN 61037:1992 platí:

Tento seznam nahrazuje všechny předchozí seznamy zveřejněné v Úředním věstníku Evropské unie.

----

(1)

----
(V. D. 24)

Entry No. 2613, etc.

#### E. S. Zerwekh Co. a/c D. P. Bushnell & Co. et al. *v.*United States

(Decided September 14, 1956)

*Philip Stein (Marjorie M. Shostak*of counsel) for the plaintiffs.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

These matters are presently before me on remands from classification proceedings decided by the first division of this court in *E. S. Zerwekh Co. a/c D. P. Bushnell & Co. et al.*v. *United States,*34 Cust Ct. 249, Abstract 58647, and *D. P. Bushnell & Co., Inc., et al.*v. *United States,*34 Cust. Ct. 342, Abstract 58975. The judgments entered therein stated: “* * * that the matters be remanded to a single judge in reappraisement pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d).”

The matters have been submitted for decision upon an agreed statement of facts entered into by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto.

Upon the agreed facts, I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. §1402 (d)), to be the proper basis for determining the values of the involved merchandise and that such values are as set forth in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, less the deductions from the listed unit prices as invoiced, cases and packing as shown in said schedule *“A.”*

I further find such values to be the dutiable values of said merchandise.

The actions having been abandoned insofar as all other items of merchandise are concerned, to that extent they are dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 16, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-60571 Summary Calendar

ZAHIDA JABEEN JAMAAL KHAN, Petitioner,

versus ALBERTO R. GONZALES, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, Respondent.

-------------------- Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals BIA No. A95-344-562

-------------------- Before KING, HIGGINBOTHAM, and GARZA, Circuit Judges
PER CURIAM: * Zahida Jabeen Jamaal Khan (Khan) has filed a petition for review of an order of removal of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA). She argues that the BIA erred when it rejected her claim that removal proceedings should be terminated because the proceedings were instituted based on information set forth in an application for benefits that she filed under the confidentiality provisions of the Legal Immigration Family Equity (LIFE) Act. As the BIA noted in its order of removal, the confidentiality requirements of the Immigration and NationalityNo. 06-60571 -2- Act are applicable to applications for legalization under the LIFE Act. Immigration and Nationality Act § 245A(c)(5), 8 U.S.C.§ 1255a(c)(5)(A)(i); LIFE Act, PL 106-553, 2000 HR 4942,*2762A148; 8 C.F.R. § 245a.21. However, the Immigration Judge’s determination that Khan failed to establish that she filed an application under the LIFE Act is based upon substantial evidence. See Roy v. Ashcroft , 389 F.3d 132, 137-38 (5th Cir. 2004)

. Moreover, the Immigration Judge’s determination that an independent source apprised Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials of Khan’s illegal status is also based upon substantial evidence. See id. The BIA therefore did not err when it determined that the confidentiality provisions of the LIFE Act were not violated. Khan’s petition for review is DENIED.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Michael J. Liberati :

:

Plaintiff, :

v. : Civil Action Number: 2:05-cv-1661

: Judge Michael M. Baylson

BRT, INC. :

:

and :

:

Harold Mast, President :

BRT, INC. :

:

Defendants. :

NOTICE OF ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

TO: CLERK OF COURT

Please enter the appearance of John Neumann Hickey, Esq., PA Attorney ID #61896, 20

West Front Street, Media, PA 19063, e-mail address: jneumannhickey@hotmail.com, phone

number: (610) 891-8883, fax number: (610) 891-8923 as trial counsel on behalf of the Plaintiff,

Michael J. Liberati. Mr. Hickey has always been named as counsel in the Liberati case but for

some reason his name has never been listed on the docket.

Respectfully Submitted by:

SIGNATURE CODE: SAZ4759

s/Sharon Ann Ziegler, Esq.

(PA Attorney I.D. No. 64027)

5118 Foxfire Trail

Kingsport, TN 37664

(423) 288-9623

Attorney for Plaintiff

Case 2:05-cv-01661-MMB Document 51 Filed 05/03/06 Page 1 of 2
2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Sharon Ann Ziegler, Esq., the undersigned and attorney of record for the plaintiff in the

case Liberati v. BRT, Inc. et al.,Civil Action File No.: 2:05-cv-1661 hereby certifies that a true

and correct copy of Plaintif’sNotice of Entry of Appearance was served on May 3, 2006 via email transmission and facsimile to the following counsel of record:

Michael J. Crocenzi, Esq.

Goldberg Katzman

320 Market Street

Strawberry Square

P.O. Box 1268

Harrisburg, PA 17108-1268

Attorney for Defendants

SIGNATURE CODE: SAZ4759

s/Sharon Ann Ziegler, Esq.

Case 2:05-cv-01661-MMB Document 51 Filed 05/03/06 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

SCOTT RUFFING, et al : CIVIL ACTION

Plaintiff :

: NO. 02-CV-4422

 vs. :

:

KALMAR INDUSTRIES, U.S.A., INC., et al :

Defendant :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 2nd day of July, 2003, upon consideration of the Defendant

Transportation Equipment Services, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 12(b)(6)

(Document No. 16) and the Stipulation of Dismissal dismissing the action as to the

defendant Transportation Equipment Services, Inc. (Document No. 25), it is ORDERED

that the motion is DENIED AS MOOT.

BY THE COURT:

 

TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE, J.

Case 2:02-cv-04422-TJS Document 26 Filed 07/02/2003 Page 1 of 1
(C. D. 91)

#### L. Oppleman, Inc. *v.*United States

*80United States Customs Court, Second Division

(Decided February 2, 1939)

*Tompkins & Tompkins (Allerlon deC. Tompkins*of counsel) for *the*plaintiff.

*Charles D. Lawrence,*Acting Assistant Attorney General *(Richard E. Fitz-Gibbon,*special attorney), for the defendant.

Before Tjxson, I&ncheeoe, and Dallingeb, Judges

DalliNGee, Judge:

This is a suit arising at the port of New York brought to recover certain customs duties alleged to have been improperly exacted on a particular importation of numbering machines. Duty was levied thereon at the rate of 45 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 397 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as manufactures of metal not specially provided for. It is claimed that said articles are properly dutiable at 277⁄8 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 372 of said act as machines not specially provided for, or, alternatively, at 25 per centum ad valorem under said paragraph 372 as printing machinery.

A sample of the importation is in evidence as Exhibit 1. In addition, the plaintiff offered in evidence the testimony of Samuel Sanders, secretary and general manager of the plaintiff corporation, who, after identifying Exliibit 1, testified that the article was a numbering machine used for the purpose of numbering papers or library cards, either repeating the same number or printing the numbers consecutively; that the numbers are printed on the paper or cards by means of metal type and an inking pad; and that there is a device or mechanism on the machines which prints numbers to run consecutively or to repeat, as desired.

From the evidence and from an examination of the sample we are satisfied that the machines in question are the typical pressure numbering machines found on desks of offices and elsewhere where such numbering is required; that the mechanisms actually print the numbers by means of metal type and ink applied thereto; and that the result of the operation of the machine is the printing of numbers.

The single exception to the specific provision in said paragraph 372 for printing machinery is the particular kind of mechanism which prints textiles. Obviously the present machines are not in that category. Hence we can see no reason for excluding the instant machines from the provision for printing machinery.

We therefore hold the imported articles to be properly dutiable at the rate of 25 per centum ad valorem under the provisions in said paragraph 372 for “printing machinery,” as alleged by the plaintiff. That .claim is therefore sustained, but as to all other merchandise the claims are overruled. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 50925.

#### Protest 23380-K of Louis M. Vordemberge (Baltimore).

*235Opinion by

Mollison, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise consist of leather girths and stirrup leathers of the same kind in all material respects as exhibits 2, 3, 4, and illustrative exhibit 5 in *Little Joe Wiesenfeld Co.*v. *United States*(10 Cust. Ct. 101, C. D. 731). In accordance therewith the claim at 15 percent under paragraph 1530 (f), as modified by T. D. 49753, was sustained.
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Championship Auto Racing Teams, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Christopher R. Pook, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section G 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Christopher R. Pook

Christopher R. Pook
Chief Executive Officer
August 13, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Championship Auto Racing Teams, Inc. and will be retained by
Championship Auto Racing Teams, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
165 AI Mooney Road North 

r-' Kerrville. Texas 78028 

..--..._ 

THIS BULLETIN IS FAA APPROVED FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN 

SERVICE .BULLETIN M20-313A 

· Date: February 29; ~012 

MOONEY AVIATION COMPANY 

KERRVILLE, TEXAS 78028- FAX to 830-257-4635 

AD za12-os-o9 N SERVICE (BULLETIN) (INSTRUCTION) NO. M 2.0-31.$4 HAS BEEN COMPUED 

SERIAL NUMBER 2 5 0 Q_ 

r 

WITH ON AIRCRAFT MODEL NJ .3. 0 ETach. Time: N-Number C.- G W C E. (Reg. No.) 

Dateof 2 2.S Compliance: 0 12 - o ~ -

~~plied Je y rv z e)'\ +Yl e y 

M 2.44 707 

Inspection Report: Ajc. fo u. t\ d 

Fonn 07oG001 F A A 

'. 

' . . . .. . . f ~ 

MOONEY AVIATION COMPANY 

ATT'N: TECHNICAL SUPPORT 

165 AI Mooney Road, North 

Kenville; Texas 78028 

SEND TO: 

Mooney Aviation Company 

165 AI·Moonev Road North 

Kerrville, TX 78028 

FiQure SB M20-313-2 - Compliance CUrd 

PLACE 

STAMP 

HERE 

. .·:. 

. ......... 

·page4of4 

MOONEY AVIATION COMPANY. INC. 165AIMooneyRoadNotth, Kerrville, T~ 7~tei:B»8fi~ www.niooney.com '.1 • 

,.(·.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Quarterly Report of CSK
Auto Corporation on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending October 31, 2004 (the Report) for the
purpose of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d -14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(the Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. Maynard L. Jenkins, the Chief Executive Officer and Don W. Watson, the Chief Financial Officer of
CSK Auto Corporation, each certifies that to the best of their knowledge:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of CSK Auto Corporation. /s/ Maynard L. JenkinsMaynard L. Jenkins

Chief Executive Officer June 10, 2005 /s/ Don W. WatsonDon W. Watson
Chief Financial Officer June 10, 2005
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 2SUPPLEMENT	&"Arial,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2022 ReportingSection VII  

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2022-04	&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000DRAFT&K000000 VII CER - &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout 12/1/21
**Exhibit
      23.2**





**H**AM,


**L**ANGSTON
&


**B**REZINA,
      L.L.P.


Certified
      Public Accountants








Family
      Room Entertainment Corporation:


1438
      N.
      Gower Street Box 68


Building
      35, Suite 535


Hollywood,
      CA 90028





As
      the
      Registrant’s former independent registered public accounting firm, we hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in this Annual Report on From 10-KSB
      of our report, dated October 15, 2006 relating to the financial statements
      of
      Family Room Entertainment Corporation as of June 30, 2006.








/s/
      Ham, Langston & Brezina,
      L.L.P.








Houston,
      Texas


October
      12, 2007
Case 2:05-cv-01099-ER Document 51-1 Filed 11/23/05 Page 1 of 15
Case 2:05-cv-01099-ER Document 51-1 Filed 11/23/05 Page 2 of 15
Case 2:05-cv-01099-ER Document 51-1 Filed 11/23/05 Page 3 of 15
Case 2:05-cv-01099-ER Document 51-1 Filed 11/23/05 Page 4 of 15
Case 2:05-cv-01099-ER Document 51-1 Filed 11/23/05 Page 5 of 15
Case 2:05-cv-01099-ER Document 51-1 Filed 11/23/05 Page 6 of 15
Case 2:05-cv-01099-ER Document 51-1 Filed 11/23/05 Page 7 of 15
Case 2:05-cv-01099-ER Document 51-1 Filed 11/23/05 Page 8 of 15
Case 2:05-cv-01099-ER Document 51-1 Filed 11/23/05 Page 9 of 15
Case 2:05-cv-01099-ER Document 51-1 Filed 11/23/05 Page 10 of 15
Case 2:05-cv-01099-ER Document 51-1 Filed 11/23/05 Page 11 of 15
Case 2:05-cv-01099-ER Document 51-1 Filed 11/23/05 Page 12 of 15
Case 2:05-cv-01099-ER Document 51-1 Filed 11/23/05 Page 13 of 15
Case 2:05-cv-01099-ER Document 51-1 Filed 11/23/05 Page 14 of 15
Case 2:05-cv-01099-ER Document 51-1 Filed 11/23/05 Page 15 of 15
No. 49992.

#### Protests 979942-G, etc., of Jordon Marsh Co. et al. (Boston and Cleveland).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
# C_2017374EN.01003401.xml

| 6.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 374/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 374/34

---

Judgment of the General Court of 21 September 2017 — the Logistical Approach v EUIPO — Idea Groupe (Idealogistic)

(Case T-620/16) (1)

1

((European trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark Idealogistic - Earlier national word mark idéa logistique - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Examination of the facts of its own motion - Article 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009))

(2017/C 374/51)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: The Logistical Approach (Uden, the Netherlands) (represented by: R. Milchior, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Hanf and S. Pétrequin, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Idea Groupe (Montoir de Bretagne, France) (represented by: P. Langlais, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 20 June 2016 (Case R 1435/2015-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Idea Groupe and The Logistical Approach.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders The Logistical Approach BV to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders The Logistical Approach BV to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 402, 31.10.2016.

1

---
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 1SUPPLEMENT	&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000DRAFT	&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2017 ReportingSection VII

&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000Draft&K000000 Bulletin No. 2017-06	&"Arial,Bold"VII VSR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout 04-20-17