alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned, Terry Davis, is the Chief Financial Officer of Pocahontas Bancorp, Inc. (the Company).

This
statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the Company of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 (the Report).

By execution of this statement, I certify that:



| | A) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | B) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods covered by the Report.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this statement
will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that this statement be deemed
to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



|             |  |                
|------------ |  | ---------------
|May 19, 2006 |  | /s/ Terry Davis
|Dated        |  | Terry Davis    



33
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

TOLEDO MACK SALES & }

SERVICE, INC., }

}

Plaintiff, } Civil Action No. 

} 2:02-CV-04373-RLB

}

v. }

} JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

MACK TRUCKS, INC., }

}

Defendant. }

MACK TRUCKS, INC., }

}

Plaintiff, }

}

v. }

}

TOLEDO MACK SALES & } JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

SERVICE, INC., and }

}

PAI INDUSTRIES, INC., }

950 Northbrook Parkway }

Suwanee, Georgia, }

}

Defendants. }

COUNTERCLAIM DEFENDANT PAI INDUSTRIES, INC.’S MOTION 

TO DISMISS COUNT V OF DEFENDANT/COUNTERCLAIM PLAINTIFF 

MACK TRUCK, INC.’S COUNTERCLAIM

COMES NOW Counterclaim Defendant PAI Industries, Inc. (“PAI”) and moves the 

Court, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), to dismiss Count V of Defendant/Counterclaim 

Plaintiff Mack Trucks, Inc.’s (“Mack”) Counterclaim, on the grounds that Count V fails to state a 

claim upon which relief may be granted.

Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 13-2 Filed 09/16/2002 Page 1 of 3
1507894v1

2

In support of its Motion, PAI relies upon its Memorandum of Law In Support of Its 

Motion to Dismiss, filed simultaneously herewith.

WHEREFORE, PAI respectfully requests that its Motion be GRANTED, and that Count 

V of Mack’s Counterclaim be dismissed with prejudice. 

This 16th day of September, 2002.

Respectfully submitted,

WIGGIN & DANA LLP

By:

Joseph Schumacher

Kimberly S. Toomey

Quaker Park 

1001 Hector Street

Conshohocken, Pennsylvania 19428

(610) 834-2400

(610) 834-3055 fax

Attorney for Counterclaim

Defendant PAI Industries, Inc.

OF COUNSEL

Stephen M. Dorvee 

Ga. Bar 226989

Scott E. Taylor

Ga. Bar 785596

Ashley M. Steiner

Ga. Bar 678211

ARNALL GOLDEN GREGORY LLP

2800 One Atlantic Center

1201 West Peachtree Street

Atlanta, Georgia 30309

(404) 873-8500

(404) 873-8501 fax

Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 13-2 Filed 09/16/2002 Page 2 of 3
1507894v1

3

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that, on September 16, 2002 I served the foregoing COUNTERCLAIM 

DEFENDANT PAI INDUSTRIES, INC.’S MOTION TO DISMISS by First Class U.S. mail 

to:

Jon A. Baughman

Jeremy Heep

Barak A. Bassman

Pepper Hamilton LLP

3000 Two Logan Square

18th and Arch Streets

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2799

Wayne A. Mack

J. Manly Parks

Duane Morris LLP

One Liberty Place

Philadelphia, PA 19103-7396

_____________________________

Kimberly S. Toomey

Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 13-2 Filed 09/16/2002 Page 3 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

 THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

DOLORES (DEE) BARRETT, : CIVIL ACTION NO.

: 02-cv-4421

Plaintiff, :

:

v. :

:

THE GREATER HATBORO CHAMBER :

OF COMMERCE, INC., JOHN J. (BUD) :

AIKEN, and MICKEY GLANTZ, :

:

Defendants. : JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

O R D E R

AND NOW, to wit this _______ day of __________, 2004, upon consideration of

Plaintiff’s Motion for Sanctions For Failure to Comply with Discovery Order, and

Defendants’ Opposition thereto, it is hereby ORDERED and DECREED that the said

Motion is DENIED.

BY THE COURT:

______________________________

J.

Case 2:02-cv-04421-PBT Document 18-4 Filed 05/25/2004 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:02-cv-04421-PBT Document 18-4 Filed 05/25/2004 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:02-cv-04402-PBT Document 7 Filed 02/25/2003 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:02-cv-04402-PBT Document 7 Filed 02/25/2003 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:05-cr-00067-AB Document 61 Filed 09/10/09 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:05-cr-00067-AB Document 61 Filed 09/10/09 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:05-cr-00067-AB Document 61 Filed 09/10/09 Page 3 of 3
No. 53490.

protest 143458-K (New York).

#### J. M. Rodgers *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

The protest was dismissed.
The information contained i n this file set includes St. Johns River Power Park (SJRPP) quot es provided by

Black and Veatch (see B&V 10

- 25

- 10 email vendor quote s.txt for more information )

File List:
61.1600.00F Elevator Proposal.pdf
61.3801.00F Ductwork Proposal.pdf
61.3803.00F Expansion Joints Proposal.pdf
61.4001.00F Structural Steel Proposal .pdf
62.0205.00F Nox Monitoring.pdf
62.0207.00F NOx Inlet Sampling Fans Proposal.pdf
62.0209.00F. Anhydrous Ammonia Proposal.pdf
62.3410 Dampers.pdf
62.3415.00F Sonic Horns Proposal.pdf
63.3000.00F 480 Feeder breaker Proposal.pdf
63.3002.00F Med Voltage VDS & Motors Proposal.pdf
63.3002.00F Med Voltage VFDs & Motors & Fd Fan Mods Propos al.xls
63.3002.00F(2) Drive System & Motors for ID Fans Proposal.pdf
63.3603.00F SUS Transformers Proposal.pdf
63.3604.00F MCC Gexpro Proposal.pdf
64.0202.00F DCS Metso Mods Proposal.pdf
64.0203.00F DCS ABB Mods Proposal.pdf

B&V 10

- 25

- 10 email vendor quote s.txt
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

DOLORES (DEE) BARRETT : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. : NO. 02-CV-4421

THE GREATER HATBORO CHAMBER :

OF COMMERCE, INC., JOHN J. (BUD) :

AIKEN, and MICKEY GLANTZ : JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

ORDER

AND NOW, this day of 2004, upon consideration of

Plaintiff’s Motion for Sanctions for Failure to Comply with Discovery Order and supporting

Memorandum of Law, it is hereby ORDERED that a hearing is scheduled in this matter for the

 day of 2004, in Courtroom 3810, to determine whether sanctions

will be imposed, including the possibility of judgment by default against defendants, a monetary

fine and/or reasonable counsel fees for this discovery matter, and other potential sanctions pursuant

to Rule 37(b)(2) and (d).

BY THE COURT,

 

Petrese B. Tucker, U.S.D.J. 

Case 2:02-cv-04421-PBT Document 17-4 Filed 05/13/2004 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 


FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 


ELAINE SCATTERGOOD CIVIL ACTION 

v. 

LEE BILLITER, et al. NO. 05-3073 

ORDER 

i 

AND NOW, this~ '/--day of December, 2010, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 

1. Defendants' motion to dismiss (Dkt. 116) is DENIED. 

2. Ms. Scattergood shall make herself available for deposition on or before January 14, 

2011. 

3. Discovery shall conclude on February 15,2011. 

4. A status conference is scheduled for February 21, 2011, at 10 a.m. At that time we will 

set a schedule for dispositive motions and discuss a schedule for trial in the event the dispositive 

motions are denied. 

/
No. 47816.

#### Protest 999077-G of Frankel Importing Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the articles in question are in imitation of precious or semiprecious stones composed wholly or in chief value of glass, similar in all material respects to the merchandise covered by Abstract 47109, and in view of the further stipulation that they are not composed in any part of synthetic resin or ivory, that they do not imitate pearls, and are not imitation pearl beads, the merchandise was held dutiable at 25 percent under paragraph 1503 by virtue of T. D. '49458, as claimed.
Before the Third Division,

October 25, 1960

No. 64796.

#### Ucagco, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 303570-K (Boston).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of decorative after-dinner cups and saucers the same in all material respects as those the subject of *United States*v. *The Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co. a/c United China & Glass Company*(47 C.C.P.A. 1, C.A.D. 719), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 87 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 1 of 24
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 87 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 2 of 24
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 87 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 3 of 24
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 87 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 4 of 24
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 87 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 5 of 24
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 87 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 6 of 24
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 87 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 7 of 24
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 87 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 8 of 24
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 87 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 9 of 24
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 87 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 10 of 24
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 87 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 11 of 24
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 87 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 12 of 24
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 87 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 13 of 24
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 87 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 14 of 24
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 87 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 15 of 24
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 87 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 16 of 24
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 87 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 17 of 24
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 87 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 18 of 24
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 87 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 19 of 24
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 87 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 20 of 24
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 87 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 21 of 24
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 87 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 22 of 24
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 87 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 23 of 24
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 87 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 24 of 24
EXHIBIT 99.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63
                      OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE


I, Steven C. Preston, the Chief Financial Officer of The ServiceMaster  Company,
certify that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended March
31, 2002,  fully  complies  with  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information  contained in such Form
10-Q/A fairly presents,  in all material respects,  the financial  condition and
results of operations of The ServiceMaster Company.




                          /S/ STEVEN C. PRESTON
                          ----------------------
                          Steven C. Preston
                             Chief Financial Officer
                          May 13, 2003


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to The ServiceMaster  Company and will be retained by The ServiceMaster
Company and  furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its staff
upon request.







                                       26
<PAGE>
September 11, 1951

No. 55881.

Suit 4660.

#### LaManna Azema & Farnan, Inc. *v.*United States.

C. D. 1248 reversed June 26, 1951. C. A. D. 461.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ANDREA CONSTAND, :

:

Plaintiff, :

: No. 05-cv-1099

v. :

:

WILLIAM H. COSBY, JR., :

:

Defendant. :

NOTICE OF APPEAL

Notice is hereby given that William H. Cosby, Jr., defendant in the above named case, 

hereby appeals to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit from an order lifting 

the seal on confidential documents, entered in this action on the 6th day of July, 2015 (Doc. 

106).

Dated: July 27, 2015 s/ Patrick J. O’Connor

Patrick J. O’Connor

George M. Gowen III

COZEN O’CONNOR

One Liberty Place

1650 Market St.

Philadelphia, PA 19103

215.665.2000

Attorneys for Defendant

Case 2:05-cv-01099-ER Document 115 Filed 07/27/15 Page 1 of 1
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

BRIAN CLANCY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D17-1165

[July 26, 2018]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm 

Beach County; Samantha Schosberg Feuer, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

502015CF012795A.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Ian Seldin, Assistant Public 

Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, TAYLOR and FORST, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

RODNEY BURNS, :

Plaintiff, : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. :

:

PA DEPARTMENT :

OF CORRECTIONS, et al, : No. 05-3462

Defendants. :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 26 day of May, 2009, upon consideration of Defendants’ Second Motion th

for Summary Judgment, Plaintiff’s Second Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, the responses

thereto, and for the reasons discussed in the Court’s Memorandum of May 26, 2009, it is hereby

ORDERED that:

1. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Document No. 73) is GRANTED as to

Plaintiff’s First, Second, Third, Fifth, Sixth and Seventh Claims for Relief and

DENIED in part as to Plaintiff’s Fourth Claim for Relief. 

2. Plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment (Document No. 76) is GRANTED

in part as to Plaintiff’s Fourth Claim for Relief and otherwise DENIED.

3. The Court DECLARES that Defendant Canino’s failure to independently assess the

reliability and credibility of the confidential informants whose testimony she relied

upon in assessing Plaintiff’s inmate account violated the procedural due process

rights Plaintiff was entitled to given his protected property interest in the security of

his inmate account. 

Case 2:05-cv-03462-BMS Document 83 Filed 05/27/09 Page 1 of 2
4. The clerk of court is directed to close this case.

BY THE COURT:

Berle M. Schiller, J.

Case 2:05-cv-03462-BMS Document 83 Filed 05/27/09 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 12.3
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
I, Alex Mandl, Chief Executive Officer of Gemplus International S.A., certify that:
1.   I have reviewed this amendment to the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Gemplus International S.A.;and
2.   Based on my knowledge, this amendment to the Annual Report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in lightof the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this Annual Report.
Date: April 18, 2005                                                               /s/ Alex Mandl   Alex Mandl   Chief Executive Officer
----

**FOREWARD**

          In 1987, theOffice of the Federal Coordinator for Meteorology (OFCM) assumed responsibilityfor preparing and  maintaining Federal Meteorological Handbooks.  The task ofaccomplishing preparation and coordination of handbook  No. 3(FMH-3)--Radiosonde Observations and associated handbooks #4, 5, and 6, wasassigned to the Ad Hoc Group for  FMH-Upper Air (AHG FMH-UA) through the WorkingGroup for Upper Air Observations under the Committee for Basic  Services (CBS). 	          This editionof FMH-3, "Rawinsonde and Pibal Observations," concludes a 5-yeareffort by the AHG/FMH-UA to meet the  objectives outlined in giudance issued byCBS.  Specifically, the CBS directed that the new FMH-3 should:  (1)  reflectour Nation's commitments to international organizations (i.e.,WMO,ICAO) ;  (2)integrate conventional and  automatically observed data by adopting newstandards for automated, augmented, and manual observations;  (3) allow agencies to prepare and issue agency-specific procedures and instructions fortaking and reporting upper air  observations;  and (4) combine FMHs 3,4,5, and 6into a new FMH-3.  In previous editions of the Federal  MeteorologicalHandbooks, all procedures and internal agency instructions pertaining to upperair observations were  described in FMHs 3 through 6. Beginning with thisedition, FMH-3 will contain only Federal standards; it will not  containagency-specific procedures and practices.  	          Iwould like to acknowledge the efforts put forth by members of the AHG/FMH-UA,past as well as present, who  diligently labored and persevered to produce thisdocument.  Interagency coordination, especially the establishment  of newstandards which have impacts on policies and procedures, is an extremelydifficult task and worthy of  special recognition.  I commend the AHG/FMH-UAmembers for their efforts.**Julian M. Wright, Jr.Federal Coordinator for Meteorological Serviesand Supporting Research**

----

Table of ContentsPublications ListHome
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       1,334,210
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  315,830
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             2,658,002
<PP&E>                                       1,880,103
<DEPRECIATION>                                 366,179
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,195,084
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,413,077
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,775
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,630,571
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,195,084
<SALES>                                      3,007,904
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,007,904
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,821,594
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              20,272
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                176,459
<INCOME-TAX>                                    68,487
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            107,972
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   107,972
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

KEVIN MITCHELL : CIVIL ACTION

:

 :

 v. :

:

 : 

EXPERIAN INFORMATION :

SOLUTIONS, INC. et al. : NO. 02-4442

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 8th day of January, 2003, in accordance with the court's

procedure for random reassignment of cases, it is hereby

ORDERED that the above-captioned case is reassigned from the calendar of

the Honorable Berle M. Schiller to the calendar of the Honorable John P. Fullam, as related to Civil

Action No. 02-3812.

 FOR THE COURT:

 JAMES T. GILES 

 Chief Judge

 ATTEST:

 ___________________

 MICHAEL E. KUNZ

 Clerk of Court

Case 2:02-cv-04442-JF Document 20 Filed 01/09/2003 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

 THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

DOLORES (DEE) BARRETT, : CIVIL ACTION NO.

:

Plaintiff, : 02-CV-4421

:

v. :

:

THE GREATER HATBORO CHAMBER : JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

OF COMMERCE, INC., JOHN J. (BUD) :

AIKEN, and MICKEY GLANTZ, :

:

Defendants. :

O R D E R

AND NOW, to wit this ______ day of __________, 2005, upon consideration of

Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and Memorandum of Law In Support

thereof, and any response thereto, it is hereby ORDERED and DECREED that

Summary Judgment is entered in favor of the Defendants.

BY THE COURT:

______________________________

J.

Case 2:02-cv-04421-PBT Document 23-4 Filed 01/10/2005 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:02-cv-04421-PBT Document 23-4 Filed 01/10/2005 Page 2 of 2
# C_2017144EN.01001801.xml

| 8.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 144/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 144/18

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Münster (Germany) lodged on 27 December 2016 — EV v Finanzamt Lippstadt

(Case C-685/16)

(2017/C 144/23)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Finanzgericht Münster

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: EV

Applicant:

Defendant: Finanzamt Lippstadt

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Are the provisions regarding the free movement of capital and payment transactions in Article 63 et seq. of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to be interpreted as precluding Paragraph 9 No 7 of the Gewerbesteuergesetz 2002, as amended by the 2008 Jahressteuergesetz (annual tax act) of 20 December 2007 (BGBl. I 2007, 3150) in so far as those provisions cause the trade tax deduction of the profit and add-backs by the amount of the profits from shares in a capital company whose management and registered office are located outside the Federal Republic of Germany to be tied to stricter requirements than for the deduction of the profit and the add-backs by the amount of the profits from shares in a non-tax-exempt domestic capital company or by that part of the trade earnings of a domestic undertaking allocated to a permanent establishment not located in Germany?

---
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

1

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

Update an Existing OTCnet Bookmark or Favorite

To update an existing OTCnet bookmark in Google Chrome, complete the following steps: 

1. In Google Chrome, click the three dots on the top right. See Figure 1.

Figure 1. Google Chrome More Button

2. Move your mouse cursor over Bookmarks and click Bookmark Manager

3. Locate the old OTCnet application bookmark and click the three dots to the right (More 

Actions). See Figure 2.

Figure 2.Google Chrome Bookmark Manager

4. Click Edit and enter the new OTCnet URL: 

https://www.otcnet.for.fiscal.treasury.gov/otcnet/views/home.xhtml , and click Save. See

Figure 3.

Figure 3. Google Chrome Edit Bookmark
Bureau of the Fiscal Service

2

OTCnet Printable Job Aid

To update an existing bookmark In Microsoft Edge, complete the following steps:

1. In Microsoft Edge, click the three dots on the top right. See Figure 4.

Figure 4. Microsoft Edge Settings and More

2. Click Favorites and locate your old OTCnet application bookmark

3. Right-click on the old bookmark and click edit.

4. Enter the new OTCnet URL:

https://www.otcnet.for.fiscal.treasury.gov/otcnet/views/home.xhtml and click Save. See

Figure 5.

Figure 5. Microsoft Edge Edit Favorite
# sec5_balsh_2024

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2023-08	&"Arial,Bold"&10V BS - &P	&"Arial,Bold"&10April 2023 IRC
# Bulletin No. 2022-10

&"Arial,Bold"&12U.S. Standard General LedgerSummary of Changes	

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2022-10	&"Arial,Bold" &P	&"Arial,Bold"March 2021

# Additional Information

&"Arial,Bold"&12U.S. Standard General LedgerSummary of Changes	

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2022-10	&"Arial,Bold" &P	&"Arial,Bold"March 2021