### 75636 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 232 / Thursday, December 3, 2015 / Rules and Regulations

9A004 Space Launch Vehicles and ‘‘Spacecraft,’’ ‘‘Spacecraft Buses,’’‘‘Spacecraft Payloads,’’ ‘‘Spacecraft’’ Onboard Systems or Equipment, and Terrestrial Equipment, as Follows (see List of Items Controlled).
License Requirements
* * * * *

License Requirements Note: 9A004.b through .f are controlled under ECCN 9A515.
* * * * *

List of Items Controlled

Related Controls*** (3) See USML Categories IV for the space launch vehicles and XV for other spacecraft that are ‘‘subject to the ITAR’’ (see 22 CFR parts 120 through 130).
* * * * *

■ 12. In Supplement No. 1 to part 774, Category 9, ECCN 9A010 is amended by:

■ a. Revising the Heading; and

■ b. Adding a Related Controls Note to the List of Items Controlled Section, to read as follows:
9A010 ‘‘Specially Designed’’ ‘‘Parts,’’ ‘‘Components,’’ Systems and Structures, for Launch Vehicles, Launch Vehicle Propulsion Systems or ‘‘Spacecraft’’. (See Related Controls paragraph.)

List of Items Controlled

Related Controls: (1) See USML Category IV of the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) (22 CFR parts 120 through 130) and ECCN 9A604 for paragraphs 9A010.a, .b and .d. (2) See USML Category XV of the ITAR and ECCN 9A515 for paragraph 9A010.c. (3) See Supplement No. 4 to part 774, Order of Review for guidance on the process for determining classification of items.
* * * * *

Dated: November 23, 2015. Kevin J. Wolf, Assistant Secretary for Export Administration.
[FR Doc. 2015–30253 Filed 12–2–15; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 3510–33–P**

**DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY** 

**Coast Guard**

**33 CFR Part 117**

**[Docket No. USCG–2015–1019]**

**Drawbridge Operation Regulation; English Kills, New York City, NY** 

**AGENCY :**  Coast Guard, DHS.

**ACTION :**  Notice of deviation from drawbridge regulation.

**SUMMARY :**  The Coast Guard has issued a temporary deviation from the operating schedule that governs the Metropolitan Avenue Bridge across the English Kills, mile 3.4, at New York City, New York. This deviation is necessary to perform operating machinery installation. This deviation allows the bridge to remain in the closed position for approximately 3 days.

**DATES :**  This deviation is effective from 6 a.m. on December 7, 2015 to 5 p.m. on December 10, 2015.

**ADDRESSES :**  The docket for this deviation, [USCG–2015–1019] is available at http://www.regulations.gov.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  If you have questions on this temporary deviation, call or email Ms. Judy K. Leung-Yee, Project Officer, First Coast Guard District, telephone (212) 514– 4330, email judy.k.leung-yee@uscg.mil.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  New York City DOT requested this temporary deviation from the normal operating schedule to perform operating machinery installation.

The Metropolitan Avenue Bridge, mile 3.4, across the English Kills has a vertical clearance in the closed position of 10 feet at mean high water and 15 feet at mean low water. The existing bridge operating regulations are found at 33 CFR 117.801(e).

The waterway has one commercial facility located upstream of the bridge.

Under this temporary deviation, the Metropolitan Avenue Bridge may remain in the closed position from 6 a.m. on December 7, 2015 through 5 p.m. on December 10, 2015.

Vessels able to pass through the bridge in the closed positions may do so at any time. The bridge will not be able to open for emergencies and there is no immediate alternate route for vessel to
pass.

The Coast Guard will also inform the users of the waterways through our Local and Broadcast Notice to Mariners of the change in operating schedule for the bridge so that vessels can arrange their transits to minimize any impact caused by the temporary deviation.

In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e), the drawbridge must return to its regular operating schedule immediately at the end of the effective period of this temporary deviation. This deviation from the operating regulations is authorized under 33 CFR 117.35.

Dated: November 18, 2015. C.J. Bisignano, Supervisory Bridge Management Specialist, First Coast Guard District.
[FR Doc. 2015–30587 Filed 12–2–15; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 9110–04–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION**  **AGENCY**

**40 CFR Part 52**

**[EPA–R06–OAR–2012–0400; FRL–9939–47– Region 6]** 

**Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; New Mexico;**  **Albuquerque-Bernalillo County; Infrastructure and Interstate Transport**  **State Implementation Plan for the 2008 Lead National Ambient Air Quality**  **Standards**

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

**ACTION :**  Final rule.

**SUMMARY :**  EPA is approving a State Implementation Plan (SIP) submission from the Governor of New Mexico for the City of Albuquerque-Bernalillo County for the 2008 Lead (Pb) National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). The submittal addresses how the existing SIP provides for implementation, maintenance, and enforcement of the 2008 Pb NAAQS (infrastructure SIP or i-SIP). This i-SIP ensures that the State’s SIP for Albuquerque-Bernalillo County is adequate to meet the state’s responsibilities under the Federal Clean Air Act (CAA or Act), including the four CAA requirements for interstate transport of Pb emissions.

**DATES :**  This final rule is effective on January 4, 2016.

**ADDRESSES :**  EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID No. EPA–R06–OAR–2012–0400. All documents in the docket are listed on the http://www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available,
e.g., Confidential Business Information or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically through http:// www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas 75202–2733.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :**  Tracie Donaldson, 214–665–6633, donaldson.tracie@epa.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :**  Throughout this document wherever ‘‘we’’, ‘‘us’’, or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean the EPA. I. Background

The background for this action is discussed in detail in our September 11,


### 75637 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 232 / Thursday, December 3, 2015 / Rules and Regulations

2015, proposal (80 FR 54739). In that document, we proposed that the Albuquerque-Bernalillo County New Mexico i-SIP submittal for the 2008 PbNAAQS met the requirements for an iSIP, including the requirements for interstate transport of Pb emissions. This action is being taken under section 110 of the Act. We did not receive any comments regarding our proposed approval.

II. Final Action

We are approving the May 2, 2012, iSIP submission from AlbuquerqueBernalillo County New Mexico, which addresses the requirements of CAA sections 110(a)(1) and (2) as applicable to the 2008 Pb NAAQS. Specifically, we are approving the following infrastructure elements: 110(a)(2)(A), (B), (C), (D), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L) and (M). We are also approving the Albuquerque-Bernalillo County’s demonstration that it meets the four statutory requirements for interstate transport of Pb emissions. III. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

Under the CAA, the Administrator is required to approve a SIP submission that complies with the provisions of the Act and applicable Federal regulations. 42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s role is to approve state choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the CAA. Accordingly, this action merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and does not impose additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law. For that reason, this action:

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget under Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, January 21, 2011);

• Does not impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq. );

• Is certified as not having a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq. );

• Does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4);

• Does not have Federalism implications as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 1999);

• Is not an economically significant regulatory action based on health or safety risks subject to Executive Order 13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997);

• Is not a significant regulatory action subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001);

• Is not subject to requirements of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because application of those requirements would be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; and

• Does not provide EPA with the discretionary authority to address, as appropriate, disproportionate human health or environmental effects, using practicable and legally permissible methods, under Executive Order 12898 (59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994).

In addition, the SIP is not approved to apply on any Indian reservation land or in any other area where EPA or an Indian tribe has demonstrated that a tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of Indian country, the rule does not have tribal implications and will not impose substantial direct costs on tribal governments or preempt tribal law as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000).

The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy of the rule, to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a report containing this action and other required information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is published in the Federal Register

. This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, petitions for judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by February 1, 2016. Filing a petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule does not affect the finality of this action for the purposed of judicial review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2)). List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Incorporation by reference, Intergovernmental relations, Lead, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements.

Dated: November 17, 2015. Ron Curry, Regional Administrator, Region 6.

40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:

**PART 52—APPROVAL AND PROMULGATION OF**  **IMPLEMENTATION PLANS**

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

**Subpart GG—New Mexico**

■ 2. In § 52.1620(e), the second table entitled ‘‘EPA Approved Nonregulatory Provisions and Quasi-Regulatory Measures in the New Mexico SIP’’ is amended by adding an entry at the end of the table to read as follows:

**§ 52.1620 Identification of plan.**
* * * * *

(e) * * *


### 75638 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 232 / Thursday, December 3, 2015 / Rules and Regulations

EPA APPROVED 

### N ONREGULATORY 

### P ROVISIONS AND 

### Q UASI 

### -R EGULATORY 

### M EASURES IN THE 

### N EW 

### M EXICO 

### SIP

Name of SIP provision Applicable geographic or nonattainment area State submittal/ effective

date EPA approval date Explanation

******* Infrastructure and Interstate

Transport for the 2008 Pb NAAQS. Albuquerque-Bernalillo County. 5/2/2012 12/3/2015, [insert **Federal Register**  citation].

[FR Doc. 2015–30541 Filed 12–2–15; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**