alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4.17


Table of Contents

 Exhibit 4.17 

 [THE COCA-COLA COMPANY LETTERHEAD]

 June 2, 2008 

 Coca-Cola FEMSA de Costa Rica, S.A. 

República de Costa Rica 

 Dear Sirs: 

 In regards to the Bottler Agreement in force and effect since October 1, 2002 (“the Agreement”) entered into between you and The Coca-Cola Company (the “Company”), we inform you that a new bottler agreement is in the final stages
  of discussion and approval among the parties, which we estimate will be executed towards the middle of September 2008, hereby the Agreement is temporarily extended from March 31, 2008 until:

 September 30, 2008 

 With the exception of said extension, all the terms and conditions of the Agreement will continue to be fully valid until the expiration of the additional term, and once the extension expires, the Bottler will no longer have the right to claim a
  tacit renewal of the aforementioned Agreement.

 

		
	 	 Sincerely,
	 	 
	 	 THE COCA-COLA COMPANY 
	 	 
	 	 
	 	/s/ 
	 	 
	 	Authorized Representative 




 

 

		
	 Accepted by: 	 
	 COCA-COLA FEMSA DE COSTA RICA, S.A. 	 
	 	 
	 	 
	 	 
	/s/ 	 
	 	 
	Authorized Representative
# sec6_rsonp_2020

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2019-10	&"Arial,Bold"&10DRAFT VI RSOCNP - &P	&"Arial,Bold"&10IRC Meeting Handout 4/23/19
# sf133_schp--OUTPUT

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2024-03 Draft	&"Arial,Bold"&9V SF 133/Sch P - &P	&"Arial,Bold"&10February 15, 2024 IRC Meeting
1 IRC Handout 12/05/19

Proposed FY 2020 Changes to Loan Guarantee Liability Transaction Codes (TCs):

1) Proposed TC Modification to Record Loan Guarantee Fees Earned, But Not Yet 

Collected:

C428 To record loans, interest, and fees receivable from non-Federal sources for defaulted 

guaranteed loans and loan guarantee activity. Do not consider as a budgetary resource until 

collected.

Comment: Applicable to activity for guaranteed loans.

Budgetary Entry 

None

Proprietary Entry

Debit 131000 Accounts Receivable

Debit 134100 Interest Receivable – Loans

Debit 135000 Loans Receivable

Credit 139900 Allowance for Subsidy

Credit 218000 Loan Guarantee Liability

Justification: The addition of USSGL 131000 Accounts Receivable allows agencies to record 

loan guarantee fee earned, but not yet collected, to a receivable account and the offsetting Loan 

Guarantee Liability account. Once cash is ultimately collected, agencies should record TC A140 

and C109.
2 IRC Handout 12/05/19

2) Proposed New TC Addition to Record Loan Guarantee Claims Incurred, But Not Yet 

Disbursed:

B417 To record in a loan guarantee financing account an accrued expense to a third party, in 

which no asset is received. This transaction includes payments of incurred default claims, 

interest supplements, and other loan guarantee financing claims.

Comment: Only post this transaction for claims within a loan guarantee financing account that 

are incurred, but not yet disbursed. At the time of disbursement to a third-party, post USSGL 

TC-B110.

Reference: USSGL implementation guidance; Credit Reform Case Studies

Budgetary Entry 

Debit 461000 Allotments - Realized Resources

 Credit 490100 Delivered Orders - Obligations, Unpaid

Proprietary Entry 

218000 Loan Guarantee Liability

211000 Accounts Payable

Justification: The addition of TC B417 allows agencies to record loan guarantee claims

incurred, but not yet disbursed, directly to the Loan Guarantee Liability account. Once cash is 

ultimately disbursed, agencies should record TC B110.
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 2SUPPLEMENT	&"Arial,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2018 ReportingSection VII

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2018-04	&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000DRAFT&K000000 VII VDR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout 3/1/18
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JACKLYN WORFEL MAYFIELD AND 

LORI BETH MAYFIELD,

 Appellants,

v.

TARRANT REGIONAL WATER 

DISTRICT,

 Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

§ 

No. 08-13-00100-CV

Appeal from the

67th District Court 

of Tarrant County, Texas 

(TC#067-260763-12)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the 

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. We further order that Appellee 

recover from Appellants all costs in this Court. This decision shall be certified below for 

observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 2015.

SUSAN LARSEN, Justice (Senior Judge)

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, J., and Larsen, J. (Senior Judge)

Larsen, J. (Senior Judge), sitting by assignment
Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk July 13, 2011

0706 

# Order

July 13, 2011

142742

GEORGE FROMMERT, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v SC: 142742 COA: 292097 Oakland CC: 2008-090275-NO TEERA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Defendant/ Cross-Defendant-Appellee, and

KASCO, INC.,
Defendant/Cross-Plaintiff.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the applicati on for leave to appeal the December 21, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the judgment of the Court of Appeals and
we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of Loweke v Ann Arbor Ceiling & Partition Co, LLC , 489 Mich ___ (Docke t No. 141168, decided June 6, 2011).

Z AHRA , J., did not participate because he was on the Court of Appeals panel.
Case 2:05-cv-02615-LFR Document 63 Filed 05/23/2007 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Certificationof Chief Executive Officer**

**Pursuant toSection 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of The United States Code**

 

I, J. Patrick Spainhour, theChief Executive Officer of The ServiceMaster Company, certify that (i) theQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,2010, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the informationcontained in such Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of TheServiceMaster Company.

 

 
|   | /s/  J. Patrick Spainhour |
|--------|---------------------------|
|   | J.  Patrick Spainhour     |
|   | November 15,  2010   |

 

----
No. 50387.

#### Protest 97965-K of Italian Furniture Frames Corp. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

At the trial Government counsel, citing the case of *Schelling*v. *United States*(14 Ct. Cust. Appls. 159, T. D. 41691), claimed that the-importer’s claim should be disallowed due to noncompliance with the customs regulations. Since that decision it has been held that in shortage cases the issue before the court is whether or, not there is in fact a nonimportation and compliance-with the regulations is not a condition precedent to recovery. Under the rulings laid'down in *Joseph Dixon Crucible Co.*v. *United States*(14 Cust. Ct. 71, C. D. 914), and Abstract 50268, and in view of the fact that plaintiff’s proof in the instant case was sufficient to sustain the claim that the merchandise found in excess was enumerated on the invoice in an unexamined cáse,.duty being paid upon the same, the protest was sustained.
# C_2018042EN.01002202.xml

| 5.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 42/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 42/22

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 December 2017 — Consejo Regulador ‘Torta del Casar’ v EUIPO — Consejo Regulador ‘Queso de La Serena’ (QUESO Y TORTA DE LA SERENA)

(Case T-828/16) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative trade mark QUESO Y TORTA DE LA SERENA - Protection of the designation of origin ‘Torta del Casar’ - Relative ground for refusal - Article 2(2), Article 3(1) and Article 13(1) of Regulation (EC) No 510/2006 - Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)))

(2018/C 042/32)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Consejo Regulador de la Denominación de Origen ‘Torta del Casar’ (Casar de Cáceres, Spain) (represented by: A. Pomares Caballero and M. Pomares Caballero, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Consejo Regulador de la Denominación de Origen Protegida ‘Queso de La Serena’ (Castuera, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 September 2016 (Case R 2573/2014–4), concerning opposition proceedings between Consejo Regulador de la Denominación de Origen ‘Torta del Casar’ and Consejo Regulador de la Denominación de Origen Protegida ‘Queso de La Serena’.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 26 September 2016 (Case R 2573/2014–4); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 26 September 2016 (Case R 2573/2014–4);

| 2. | Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those of the Consejo Regulador de la Denominación de Origen ‘Torta del Casar’. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those of the Consejo Regulador de la Denominación de Origen ‘Torta del Casar’.

---

(1)  OJ C 22, 23.1.2017.

1

---
Before the Third Division,

March 17, 1949

No. 52941.

#### Frances B. Wilcon *v.*United States,

protest 120729-K (Boston).

Cline, Judge:

This is a rehearing of a protest against the assessment of duty on fish cakes at the rate of 35 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 775 of the *263Tariff Act of 1930, as a mixture of fish and vegetables. It is claimed that the merchandise is properly dutiable at *2j4*cents per pound, but not less than 12)4 per centum nor more than 25 per centum ad valorem, under paragraph 720 (b) of said act, as'modified by the trade agreement with Canada, T. D. 49752.

The merchandise consisted of frozen codfish cakes with a 9.4 per centum potato content. In our original decision in this case we held that mixtures of vegetables and fish are not dutiable under paragraph 775 unless the vegetable content is substantial; that whether or not a given amount is considered substantial depends upon whether it is used merely to hold the material together during the cooking process or whether it has a -definite purpose of its own in the mixture, citing B. *Westergaard & Co.*v. *United States,*19 C. C. P. A. 299, T. D. 45469, and *Corporation Argentina de Productores de Carnes*v. *United States,*32 C. C. P. A. 175, C. A. D. 304. Since there was no evidence in the record as presented as to the purpose served by the ingredients of this merchandise, it was held that the vegetable content was substantial. *Frances B. Wilcon*v. *United States,*21 Cust. Ct. 38, C. D. 1123.

A motion for rehearing was thereafter made and granted, and when the case was again called for trial, counsel for the parties stated:

> Mb. Ziegel: This case was decided in C. D. 1123, and upon plaintiff’s motion for rehearing it was put back on the docket.

> I now offer to stipulate that the purpose and function of the potato starch as found present in the frozen codfish cakes herein is to bind and keep the particles of fish together in cake or patty form, both during original processing and final preparation and cooking for consumption as food.

> Mb. FitzGibbon: The Government agrees to that stipulation.

In *B. Westergaard & Co.*v. *United States, supra,*potato flour in meat and fish cakes in quantities ranging from 3% per centum to 6 per centum was held not present in sufficient quantities to warrant classification of the merchandise under the vegetable paragraph, since the flour was used for the purpose of holding the material together during the cooking and sterilizing processes.

In view of the above stipulation and the decision in *B. Westergaard & Co.*v. *United States, supra,*we hold that the potato content of the within merchandise is not sufficient to warrant its classification under paragraph 775 of the Tariff Act of 1930 and that the merchandise is properly dutiable under paragraph 720 (b) of said act, as modified by the trade agreement with Ganada, T. D. 49752, at 2)4 cents per pound, but not less than 12)4 per centum nor more than 25 per centum ad valorem. The protest is sustained and judgment will be rendered accordingly.
# sf133_schp--OUTPUT

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2021-17	&"Arial,Bold"&9V SF 133/Sch P - &P	&"Arial,Bold"&10April 21, 2021 IRC Meeting Handout
Part 2

SUPPLEMENT

USSGL 

Acct. USSGL Account Title

Anticipated

Budg/ 

Prop

Norm 

Bal

Begin/ 

End

Debit/ 

Credit

Auth 

Type 

Code

Apport 

Cat

Apport 

Cat B

Avail 

Time

BEA 

Cat

Borrow 

Source

Budgetary 

Impact 

Indicator

Cohort 

Year

Cust/ 

Noncust

Exch/ 

Nonexch

Fed/ 

Nonfed

Trading 

Prtnr

Trading 

Partner 

Main

PY

Adj DEFC

Pgm 

Rpt 

Cat

Reimb 

Flag

Year 

of 

BA

Reduction 

Type Fund Type

Reporting 

Type 

Code

Financing 

Account 

Code

TAS 

Status

Trans. 

Code

415100 Actual Capital Transfers to the General Fund of the U.S. 

Government, Current-Year Authority

N B C E D/C P/S D/M 1001/1992-

2020

B/P/X A/B/C/D/

E/F/G/H/

Q

D/R EC/EG/EM/EP/ER/ES/ET/TR E/F/U D/G/N U/E X/K/N

415200 Actual Capital Transfers to the General Fund of the U.S. 

Government, Prior-Year Balances

N B C E D/C D/M 1001/1992-

2020

B/P/X A/B/C/D/

E/F/G/H/

Q

D/R EC/EG/EM/EP/ER/ES/ET/TR E/F/U D/G/N U/E X/K/N

417100 Non-Allocation Transfers of Invested Balances - Receivable N B D B/E D/C P/S D/M F ### #### B/P/X A/B/C/D/

E/F/G/H/

Q

D SEQ/XXX EG/ES/ET E/F/U N U/E X/K/N

417200 Non-Allocation Transfers of Invested Balances - Payable N B C B/E D/C P/S D/M F ### #### B/P/X A/B/C/D/

E/F/G/H/

Q

D SEQ/XXX EP/ES/ET E/F/U N U X/K/N

417300 Non-Allocation Transfers of Invested Balances - Transferred N B D E D/C P/S D/M F ### #### B/P/X A/B/C/D/

E/F/G/H/

Q

D SEQ/XXX EG/EP/ES/ET E/F/U N U/E X/K/N

417590 Allocation Transfers of Current-Year Authority for NonInvested Accounts - International Monetary Fund

N B D E D/C P/S D/M F ### #### B/P/X A/B/C/D/

E/F/G/H/

Q

D EG U N U N

417690 Allocation Transfers of Prior-Year Balances - International 

Monetary Fund

N B D E D/C P/S D/M F ### #### B/P/X A/B/C/D/

E/F/G/H/

Q

D EG U N U N

422500 Expenditure Transfers From Trust Funds - Receivable N B D B/E D/C D/M 1001/1992-

2020

B/P/X A/B/C/D/

E/F/G/H/

Q

D/R EC/EG/EM/EP/ER/ES/ET/TR E/F/U D/G/N U/E X/K/N

425500 Expenditure Transfers from Trust Funds - Collected N B D E D/C D/M 1001/1992-

2020

B/P/X A/B/C/D/

E/F/G/H/

Q

D/R EC/EG/EM/EP/ER/ES/ET/TR E/F/U D/G/N U/E X/K/N

435190 Partial Cancellation of Authority - International Monetary Fund N B C E D/C D/M B/P/X A/B/C/D/

E/F/G/H/

Q

D EG U N U N

438500 Temporary Sequester Returned for Cancellation N B D E D/C P/S D/M A/B/C/D/

E/F/G/H/

Q

D SEQ EG/ET E/F/U N U/E X/K/N

439190 Adjustments to Indefinite Appropriations - International 

Monetary Fund

N B C E D/C D/M A/B/C/D/

E/F/G/H/

Q

D EG U N U N

Fiscal Year 2020 Reporting

Section IV

U.S. Standard General Ledger - Attribute Table

U S S G L A C C O U N T USSGL ATTRIBUTES B U L K F I L E A T T R I B U T E S T A S A T T R I B U T E S

Draft IRC Handout December 5, 2019
Exhibit
4.1


 





 


	
  June 26,
  2008

  	
   

  	
  VIA EMAIL

  



 


Jerry
Smith


Senior
Vice President and General Counsel


Shuffle
Master, Inc.


1106
Palms Airport Drive


Las
Vegas, Nevada 89119-3730


 


Dear
Mr. Smith:


 


We are parties to a Rights Agreement dated June 26, 1998 as amended
effective January 1, 2005 (the “Agreement”). The Agreement and the
Preferred Share Purchase Rights governed thereby (the “Rights”) are both
scheduled to expire at the close of business today. We understand that you
desire to amend the Agreement so that the Rights, instead of expiring at the
close of business today will expire at the close of business on September 26,
2008 unless earlier terminated as a result of a redemption
of the Rights or exchange of the Rights, as set forth in the Agreement. We also
understand that no Person
has become an Acquiring Person and that, therefore, your and our ability to
amend the Agreement is not limited pursuant to Section 27.


 


Please sign below confirming that you agree that the Agreement is
hereby amended to (i) extend the Final Expiration Date from June 26,
2008 to the close of business on September 26, 2008, (ii) extend our
appointment as Rights Agent until such date, and (iii) be further amended as
necessary to
be consistent with such extensions.


 


Very
truly yours,


 


 


	
  /s/
  John D. Baker

  	
   

  
	
  John
  D. Baker

  
	
  Vice
  President – Mergers Acquisitions

  



 


 


The
amendment described above is hereby confirmed.


 


 


	
  /s/
  Jerry Smith

  	
   

  
	
  Jerry
  Smith, Senior Vice President and

  
	
  General
  Counsel, Shuffle Master, Inc.

  



 


cc: Michael W. Schley, Esq.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

DIANE M. FRIEND, :

Plaintiff, : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. :

:

SUBURBAN WOODS NURSING : No. 02-4464 

HOME, LLC, et al., :

Defendants. :

ORDER

AND NOW, this day of March, 2003, it is hereby ORDERED that:

Defendant Suburban Woods Nursing Home, LLC’s Motion to Dismiss (Document No. 2)

is DENIED as moot.

BY THE COURT:

 

Berle M. Schiller, J.

Case 2:02-cv-04464-BMS Document 9 Filed 03/27/2003 Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on September 6, 2023, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Consortium for Battery Innovation (“CBI”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, Batt-tek Consulting, Johnson City, TN; GS Yuasa Energy Solutions, Roswell, GA; NV Bekaerts, Zwevegem, BELGIUM; Solveteq Ltd, Worthing West Sussex, UNITED KINGDOM; and Trafigura Pte Ltd, Geneva, SWITZERLAND, have been added as parties to this venture.                

Also, Black Diamond, Austin, TX; and Owens Corning, Apeldoorn, NETHERLANDS, have withdrawn as parties to this venture.

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and CBI intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On May 24, 2019, CBI filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on June 21, 2019 (84 FR 29241).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on February 23, 2023. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on March 27, 2023 (88 FR 18184).                

Suzanne Morris,

Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2023-25614 Filed 11-17-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
EXHIBIT 99.2






 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63
                     OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE


I, Steven C. Preston, the Chief Financial Officer of The ServiceMaster  Company,
certify  that (i) the  Quarterly  Report on Form  10-Q/A for the  quarter  ended
September 30, 2002,  fully complies with  requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the  information  contained in
such Form 10-Q/A  fairly  presents,  in all  material  respects,  the  financial
condition and results of operations of The ServiceMaster Company.




                                      /S/ STEVEN C. PRESTON
                                      ----------------------
                                      Steven C. Preston
                                      Chief Financial Officer
                                      May 13, 2003


A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to The ServiceMaster  Company and will be retained by The ServiceMaster
Company and  furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its staff
upon request.











                                       31
<PAGE>
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 2SUPPLEMENT	&"Arial,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2025 ReportingSection VII

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2024-03	&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000DRAFT&K000000 VII CER - &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout 2/15/24
No. 57650.

#### Royal Wine & Liquor, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 126168-K/737 (Chicago).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.