alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|                                                                                    |   | Year      Ended December 31, |    |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------|---------|
|                                                                                    |   | 2005                         |    | 2006 |   | 2007 |   |   | 2008 |   |   | 2009  |   |
| EARNINGS                                                                                |   |                    |    |    |   |    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Income      Before Income Taxes                                                         |   | $                            | 228,082 |   | $ | 197,273 |   | $ | 204,394 |   | $ | 190,133 |   | $ | 297,347 |   |
| Fixed      Charges (as below)                                                           |   |                         | 133,293 |   |   | 142,388 |   |   | 161,849 |   |   | 164,660 |   |   | 173,293 |   |
| Total      Earnings                                                                     |   | $                            | 361,375 |   | $ | 339,661 |   | $ | 366,243 |   | $ | 354,793 |   | $ | 470,640 |   |
|                                                                                    |   |                         |    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| FIXED      CHARGES                                                                      |   |                         |    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Interest      Expense                                                                   |   | $                            | 65,041  |   | $ | 72,723 |   | $ | 80,034 |   | $ | 89,851 |   | $ | 101,145 |   |
| Credit      for Allowance for Borrowed Funds Used         During Construction |   |                         | 4,352   |   |   | 7,465 |   |   | 5,315 |   |   | 4,609 |   |   | 8,348 |   |
| Estimated      Interest Element in Lease Rentals                                        |   |                         | 63,900  |   |   | 62,200 |   |   | 76,500 |   |   | 70,200 |   |   | 63,800 |   |
| Total      Fixed Charges                                                                |   | $                            | 133,293 |   | $ | 142,388 |   | $ | 161,849 |   | $ | 164,660 |   | $ | 173,293 |   |
|                                                                                    |   |                         |    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Ratio      of Earnings to Fixed Charges                                                 |   |                         | 2.71    |   |   | 2.38 |   |   | 2.26 |   |   | 2.15 |   |   | 2.71 |   |
|                                                                                    |   |                         |    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
**Metro     Area Exports, 1993-1997 Download/View/Links Area**

|                           | View/Print       Metro Area Exports National Summary Tables in Adobe Acrobat (PDF) |   | View Slide: Top 25       Metro Exporters, 1997      Ranked by Dollar Value |
|--------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                           | Download       Metro Area Exports National Summary Tables in ASCII Text format     |   | View Slide:       1993-97 Trends                                             |
|                           | Download       Metro Area Exports National Summary Tables in .WK4 (Spreadsheet)    |   | View Slide:      Exports Equals Jobs                                         |
|                           | Read       Press Release (11/10/98)                                                |   | View       Slide:       MSA's Joining Billion Dollar Club                  |
|                           | Metro       Area Export Report Highlights                                          |   | View Slide:      Fastest Growing Metro Exporters                             |
|                           | Visit       the President's Export Council Website                                 |   | View       Slide: Highlights                                                 |
| Go/Return to the ITA Pressroom |
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Each of the undersigned officers of Oglebay Norton Company (the Company), does hereby certify in
accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his or her knowledge:

The Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2005 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or
78o(d)); and

The information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods expressed in the Annual Report.

DATE: March 17, 2006



|    |  |                                      
|--- |  | -------------------------------------
|    | 
|By: |  | /s/    MICHAEL D. LUNDIN             
|    |  | Michael D. Lundin                    
|    |  | President and Chief Executive Officer



|    |  |                                           
|--- |  | ------------------------------------------
|    | 
|By: |  | /s/    JULIE A. BOLAND                    
|    |  | Julie A. Boland                           
|    |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being
filed as part of the Annual Report or as a separate disclosure document.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

TONG HO ZHANG, A-70-577-572 : CIVIL ACTION

Petitioner, :

 :

vs. :

 :

JOHN ASHCROFT, U.S. Attorney :

General and IMMIGRATION and :

NATURALIZATION SERVICE :

Respondents. : NO. 02-4377

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 11th day of July, 2002, upon consideration of the Motion of Petitioner,

Tong Ho Zhang, for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Document No. 1, filed July 1, 2002),

it appearing that petitioner is unable to prepay the costs of commencing this suit pursuant to 28

U.S.C. §1915(a), IT IS ORDERED that the Motion of Petitioner, Tong Ho Zhang, for Leave to

Proceed In Forma Pauperis is GRANTED.

BY THE COURT:

 

 JAN E. DUBOIS, J.

Case 2:02-cv-04377-JD Document 3 Filed 07/12/2002 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

__________________________________________

:

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA :

: CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 05-363-6

v. : 

: CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-986

DAVID CALHOUN, :

Defendant. :

__________________________________________:

ORDER

AND NOW, this 28th day of June 2012, upon consideration of Defendant David

Calhoun’s pro se Motion for a New Trial Pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33

(Doc. No. 403), his Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct his Sentence Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

2255 (Doc. No. 439), and all briefs, supplemental briefs, declarations and exhibits filed in

support of and in opposition thereto; after a careful review of the transcripts and all evidence and

documents of record in this case; and for the reasons stated in the Opinion filed this day, it is

hereby ORDERED as follows:

1. Defendant’s Motion for a New Trial Pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal

Procedure 33 (Doc. No. 403) is DENIED.

2. The Court RESERVES RULING on Defendant’s Motion to Vacate, Set Aside,

or Correct his Sentence Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc. No. 439) to the extent it challenges

the use of shackles during the preliminary stage of jury selection, but DENIES the Motion in all

other respects. Within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order the Government shall

submit any affidavits or other record evidence pertaining to the use of shackles in this case. The

Court will set a date and time for an evidentiary hearing by separate order and will require the

presence of counsel who were present before and during jury selection on April 17, 2006.
3. Upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion to File Signed Declaration in Relation

to the Government’s Newly Released Evidence (Doc. No. 473), it is hereby ORDERED that the

Motion is GRANTED. The declaration and supporting exhibits attached to Defendant’s Motion

are deemed filed as of the date of the Motion. The Court has considered these documents in

ruling on the § 2255 Motion.

4. Upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion to Seal (Doc. No. 477), it is hereby

ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED without prejudice.

1

5. Defendant’s outstanding discovery motions (Doc. Nos. 422, 425, 426, 475) are

DISMISSED as moot.

It is so ORDERED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Cynthia M. Rufe

________________________

CYNTHIA M. RUFE, J.

In his Motion, Defendant asserts: “In light of this Court having granted the Government’s motion to seal

1

the prior documents, Movant is obliged to respect the Government’s position and this Court’s mandate,” and file the

document under seal. While the Court appreciates Defendant’s attempt to comply with Court’s prior order,

Defendant’s “Notice of Receipt of Government’s Response” does not contain information that was the subject of the

Court’s prior sealing order.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                     EXHIBIT 12


                    MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST IV
                    MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING IV, L.P.
                      COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO
          COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED SECURITIES DISTRIBUTIONS
                             (dollars in thousands)



                               FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED           FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                     MARCH 26, 2004                      MARCH 28, 2003
                           ---------------------------------  ---------------------------------
                              MERRILL LYNCH    MERRILL LYNCH     MERRILL LYNCH    MERRILL LYNCH
                                 PREFERRED       PREFERRED          PREFERRED       PREFERRED
                           CAPITAL TRUST IV  FUNDING IV,L.P.  CAPITAL TRUST IV  FUNDING IV,L.P.
                           ----------------- ---------------  ----------------- ---------------

<S>                        <C>                 <C>            <C>               <C>

Earnings                       $  7,340           $  8,559      $    7,340          $   8,567
                               ========           ========        ========           ========


Fixed charges                  $      -           $      -        $      -           $      -

Preferred securities
 distribution
 requirements                     7,120              7,340           7,120              7,340
                               --------           --------        --------           --------

Total combined fixed
 charges and preferred
 securities distribution
 requirements                  $  7,120           $  7,340           7,120           $  7,340
                               ========           ========        ========           ========

Ratio of earnings to
 combined fixed charges
 and preferred securities
 distribution requirements         1.03               1.17            1.03               1.17


</TABLE>
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 221 (Friday, November 17, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 80288]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-25453]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

Department of the Navy


Notice of Fiscal Year 2023 Performance Review Board Membership

AGENCY: Department of the Navy, Department of Defense.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Department of the Navy (DON) announces the appointment of 
members to the DON Senior Executive Service (SES), Senior Level (SL), 
and Scientific and Professional (ST) Fiscal Year 2023 Performance 
Review Board (PRB). The purpose of the PRB is to provide fair and 
impartial review of the annual SES performance appraisal prepared by 
the senior executive's immediate and second level supervisor; to make 
recommendations to appointing officials regarding acceptance or 
modification of the performance rating; and to make recommendations for 
performance-based bonuses and performance-based pay increases.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, contact 
Danielle Dutton, Director, Executive Management Program Office, 
Manpower and Reserve Affairs at (703) 697-0640 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ff9b9e91969a93939ad19ed19b8a8b8b9091d19c9689bf8a8cd1919e8986d1929693"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8befeae5e2eee7e7eea5eaa5effeffffe4e5a5e8e2fdcbfef8a5e5eafdf2a5e6e2e7">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Composition of the specific PRB is provided 
below:

Ms. Mary Tompa
Mr. Frederick Stefany
Mr. Andrew Haeuptle
Ms. Leila Gardner
Ms. E. Anne Sandel
Mr. Thomas Rudowsky
Ms. Giao Phan
Mr. John Pope
Ms. Deline Reardon
Ms. Catherine Kessmeier
Mr. Mark Romano (HLR)
Mr. Timothy Bridges (HLR)
Mr. Robert Hogue (Chair)

(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 4314(c)(4))

    Dated: November 14, 2023.
J.E. Koningisor,
Lieutenant Commander, Judge Advocate General's Corps, U.S. Navy, 
Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2023-25453 Filed 11-16-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3810-FF-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
**System Enhancement Request**

To submit a system enhancement request for the OTCnet Application, please complete the following form and submit it to: FiscalService.OTCChannel@citi.com. Please provide screenshots or reference documents with the email, if available, to better assess the enhancement request.

Page 2 of 2

# image3.wmf

# image4.wmf

# image5.wmf

# image6.wmf

# image7.wmf

# image8.wmf

# image9.wmf

# image10.wmf

# image11.wmf

# image12.wmf

# image13.wmf

# image14.wmf

# image15.wmf

# image16.wmf

# image17.wmf

# image1.wmf

# image2.wmf

# image18.jpeg
Case 2:02-cv-20135-HB Document 18 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 1 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-20135-HB Document 18 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 2 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-20135-HB Document 18 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 3 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-20135-HB Document 18 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 4 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-20135-HB Document 18 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 5 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-20135-HB Document 18 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 6 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-20135-HB Document 18 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 7 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-20135-HB Document 18 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 8 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-20135-HB Document 18 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 9 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-20135-HB Document 18 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 10 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-20135-HB Document 18 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 11 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-20135-HB Document 18 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 12 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-20135-HB Document 18 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 13 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-20135-HB Document 18 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 14 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-20135-HB Document 18 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 15 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-20135-HB Document 18 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 16 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-20135-HB Document 18 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 17 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-20135-HB Document 18 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 18 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-20135-HB Document 18 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 19 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-20135-HB Document 18 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 20 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-20135-HB Document 18 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 21 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-20135-HB Document 18 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 22 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-20135-HB Document 18 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 23 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-20135-HB Document 18 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 24 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-20135-HB Document 18 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 25 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-20135-HB Document 18 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 26 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-20135-HB Document 18 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 27 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-20135-HB Document 18 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 28 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-20135-HB Document 18 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 29 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-20135-HB Document 18 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 30 of 30
Part 1 Fiscal Year 2020 Reporting

SUPPLEMENT Section IV

U.S. Standard General Ledger - Account Attribute Definition Report

Attribute Name Short

Name Attribute Definition Domain SystemChars Reference SuppliedBy

IRC Handout April 2020

Disaster Emergency Fund 

Code

DEFC Distinguishes whether the budgetary resources, obligations 

incurred, unobligated and obligated balances, and outlays are 

classified as disaster, emergency, wildfire suppression or 

none of the three. Note - Once one of the three has been 

identified, the title "Disaster/Emergency/Wildfire 

Suppression", for example, will be replaced with the actual 

title identified by OMB such as "Emergency PL 115-56."

A - Emergency PL 115-56,

B - Emergency PL 115-72,

C - Emergency PL 115-123,

D - Emergency PL 115-254,

E - Emergency PL 116-20,

F - Emergency PL 116-26,

G - Emergency PL 116-93,

H - Disaster PL 116-93,

I - Emergency PL 116-94,

J - Wildfire Suppression PL 116-

94,

K - Emergency PL 116-113,

L – Disaster/Emergency/Wildfire 

Suppression Emergency PL 116-

123,

M - Disaster/Emergency/Wildfire 

Suppression Emergency PL 116-

127,

N - Disaster/Emergency/Wildfire 

Suppression Emergency PL 116-

136,

O - Disaster/Emergency/Wildfire 

Suppression Nonemergency PL 

116-136,

P - Disaster/Emergency/Wildfire 

Suppression,

Q - Non Disaster or Emergency,

R - Disaster/Emergency/Wildfire 

Suppression,

S - Disaster/Emergency/Wildfire 

Suppression,

T - Disaster/Emergency/Wildfire 

Suppression

1/A OMB 

Guidance/TF

M

Bulk File
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1553 

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to list fentanyl analogues as schedule 

I controlled substances. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 13, 2017 

Mr. JOHNSON introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To amend the Controlled Substances Act to list fentanyl 

analogues as schedule I controlled substances. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Stopping Overdoses 

5 of Fentanyl Analogues Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FENTANYL ANALOGUES. 

7 Section 202(c) of the Controlled Substances Act (21 

8 U.S.C. 812) is amended— 

9 (a) by adding at the end of subsection (b) of Schedule 

10 I the following: 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1553 IS

1 ‘‘(23) Acetyl fentanyl 4-methylphenethyl. 

2 ‘‘(24) Acrylfentanyl. 

3 ‘‘(25) 4-fluorobutyrylfentanyl. 

4 ‘‘(26) 4-fluoroisobutyryl fentanyl. 

5 ‘‘(27) 3-furanyl fentanyl. 

6 ‘‘(28) Isobutyryl fentanyl. 

7 ‘‘(29) Meta-fluorofentanyl. 

8 ‘‘(30) Methoxyacetyl fentanyl. 

9 ‘‘(31) 4-methoxybutyrfentanyl. 

10 ‘‘(32) Ocfentanil. 

11 ‘‘(33) Ortho-fluorofentanyl. 

12 ‘‘(34) Tetrahydrofuranyl fentanyl. 

13 ‘‘(35) Valeryl fentanyl.’’; and 

14 (b) by adding at the end of Schedule I the following: 

15 ‘‘(e)(1) Unless specifically exempted or unless listed 

16 in another schedule, any material, compound, mixture, or 

17 preparation which contains any quantity of fentanyl ana18 logues, or which contains their salts, isomers, and salts 

19 of isomers whenever the existence of such salts, isomers, 

20 and salts of isomers is possible within the specific chemical 

21 designation. 

22 ‘‘(2) In paragraph (1), the term ‘fentanyl analogues’ 

23 includes any compound structurally derived from 

24 fentanyl— 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1553 IS

1 ‘‘(A) by replacement of the phenyl portion of 

2 the phenethyl group by any monocycle, whether or 

3 not further substituted in or on the monocycle; 

4 ‘‘(B) by substitution in or on the phenethyl 

5 group with alkyl, alkenyl, alkoxy, hydroxy, halo, 

6 haloalkyl, amino or nitro groups; 

7 ‘‘(C) by substitution in or on the piperidine ring 

8 with alkyl, alkenyl, alkoxy, ester, ether, hydroxy, 

9 halo, haloalkyl, amino or nitro groups; 

10 ‘‘(D) by replacement of the aniline ring with 

11 any aromatic monocycle whether or not further sub12 stituted in or on the aromatic monocycle; or 

13 ‘‘(E) by replacement of the N-propionyl group 

14 by another acyl group.’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
No. 66281.

#### Louis Greenberg & Son, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 60/18375, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of shell water flowers the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 61346, except that the merchandise herein is in chief value of shell, the merchandise was held dutiable, as claimed, at the applicable rates in effect on the respective dates of importation under the pertinent trade agreements.
No. 55194.

#### Emil Buschoff & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 142395-K and 142396-K (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of reptile skins the same in all material respects as those passed upon in *Fleming-Joffe, Ltd.*v. *United States*(25 Cust. Ct. 56, C. D. 1263), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1765 was sustained.