alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Douglas J. Mudgway

 1957–1997

ink

NASA

SP-2001-4227

Douglas J. Mudgway

e,

a
NASA SP-2001-4227

Uplink-Downlink

A History of the Deep Space Network

1957–1997

Douglas J. Mudgway

The NASA History Series

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Office of External Relations

Washington, DC 

2001
Part 1

SUPPLEMENT

LineNo.

USSGLAcct. USSGL Account Title Begin/

End

Debit/

Credit

Reimb 

Flag

Apport 

Cat

Auth Type 

Code

Avail 

Time

BEA 

Cat

Borrow 

Source

Fed/Non

Fed

Year of 

BA

11001100 439100 Adjustments to Indefinite Appropriations E D/C D 

1100 439100 Adjustments to Indefinite Appropriations E D D 

12351235 415100 Actual Capital Transfers to the General Fund of the Treasury, Current-Year Authority E D/C P M 

USSGL Crosswalk - SF 133: Report on Budget Execution and Budgetary Resources

AppropriationCapital transfer of appropriations to general fund (-)

Bulletin No. 2016-02 Draft V SF 133 - 1
----

Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 8 May 2006 — Medion AG v Hauptzollamt Duisburg

(Case C-208/06)

(2006/C 224/33)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Finanzgericht Düsseldorf (Germany)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Medion AG

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Duisburg

Question referred

Should a camcorder, which at the time of importation (1) is unable to record video signals from an external source, be classified under subheading 8525 4099 of the Combined Nomenclature, if its video interface can subsequently be reconfigured as a video input by means of activating certain switches, even though the manufacturer and the seller neither have mentioned nor support this possibility?

----

(1)  Interpretation of Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff (OJ 1987 L 256, p. 1).

----
No. 67796.

#### Alltransport, Incorporated *v.*United States,

protest 61/3914 (New York).

*323Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of synthetic resins in chief value of vinyl alcohol, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 222 (Monday, November 20, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 80720-80721]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-25565]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL ACCOUNTING STANDARDS ADVISORY BOARD


Notice of Request for Comment on the Annual Report for Fiscal 
Year 2023 and Three-Year Plan

AGENCY: Federal Accounting Standards Advisory Board.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Federal Accounting Standards 
Advisory Board (FASAB) has issued its Annual Report for Fiscal Year 
2023 and Three-Year Plan. Respondents are encouraged to comment on the 
content of the annual report and FASAB's project priorities for the 
next three years.

DATES: Written comments are requested by January 18, 2024.

ADDRESSES: The Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2023 and Three-Year Plan 
is available on the FASAB website at https://www.fasab.gov/documents-for-comment/. Copies can be obtained by contacting FASAB at (202) 512-
7350. Comments should be sent to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#b5d3d4c6d4d7f5d3d4c6d4d79bd2dac3"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9cfafdeffdfedcfafdeffdfeb2fbf3ea">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Monica R. Valentine, Executive 
Director, 441 G Street NW, Suite 1155,

[[Page 80721]]

Washington, DC 20548, or call (202) 512-7350.
    Authority: 31 U.S.C. 3511(d); Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 
U.S.C. 1001-1014.

    Dated: November 15, 2023.
Monica R. Valentine,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2023-25565 Filed 11-17-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1610-02-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6146

GEORGE D. WILLIAMS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

MICHAEL T. W. BELL,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District

Judge. (CA-00-307-5-F)

Submitted: April 12, 2001 Decided: April 18, 2001

Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George D. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Wallace-Smith, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

George D. Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate

judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. See Williams v. Bell, No. CA-00-307-5-F

(E.D.N.C. Jan. 4, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

DISMISSED
EX-4.13 Share Transfer Agreement









Exhibit 4.13




Share Transfer Agreement



This Share Transfer Agreement is signed by the following parties on November 20, 2007 in Building
3, No.1387, Zhang Dong Road, Shanghai.



Transferor (“Party A”): FENG Lei

Address: Unit C, 10/F, No.2003 Fang Cheng Garden Section 1, Feng Tai District, Beijing



Transferor (“Party B”): WANG Tao

Address: No. 6, Deng Lai Hutong, Xuan Wu District, Beijing



Transferee (“Party C”): Beijing Run An Information Consultancy Co., Ltd.

Address: Room 704, Building B, Global Trade Center, No. 36 North Third Circle Road (E), Dong Cheng
District, Beijing



The registered capital of Shanghai Run An Lian Information Consultancy Company Limited (the “Target
Company”) is RMB1,000,000. Party A has invested RMB800,000 and possesses 80% of the Target
Company’s equity interest. Party B has invested RMB200,000 and possesses 20% of the Target
Company’s equity interest. In accordance with applicable laws and regulations, through
negotiations, the Parties hereto now agree as follows:





	1.	 	Share ownership transfer and price






	 	1.1	 	Party A agrees to transfer 80% of the Target Company’s equity interest at a
price of RMB800,000 to Party C.
	 
	 	1.2	 	Party B agrees to transfer 20% of the Target Company’s equity interest at a
price of RMB200,000 to Party C.
	 
	 	1.3	 	The authorities included and affiliated with the equity interest shall be
transferred with the equity interest.
	 
	 	1.3	 	Party C shall pay the full amount of the share ownership transfer price to
Party A and Party B within sixty (60) days of the execution of this Agreement.






	2.	 	Other






	 	2.1	 	This Agreement shall be effective upon the receipt of the consent from the
shareholder meeting of the Target Company and signed by all Parties.
	 
	 	2.2	 	This Agreement shall be written in six (6) counterparties, with each Party
holding one counterpart and the Target Company holding three counterparts for use in
handling procedures related to this matter.





	 	 	 
	/s/ FENG Lei                                            

	 	/s/ WANG Tao                                            
	 
	 	 
	Party A Signature

	 	Party B Signature






[Company Seal of Beijing Run An Information Consultancy Co., Ltd.]




Party C Signature




November 20, 2007
Before the Second Division,

December 15, 1959

No. 63603.

protests 239040-K, etc. (New York).

#### Herman H. Sticht Co., Inc., and Intra-Mar Transport Corp., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of statiguns and parts thereof the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Herman H. Sticht Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(40 Cust. Ct. 173, C.D. 1979), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
(Reap. Dec. 10679)

Entry No. 1014667, etc.

#### William Pearson Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States

(Decided on rehearing [not published] February 11, 1964)

*Sharretts, Paley*<£• *Garter*for the plaintiffs.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

WilsoN, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States that the merchandise marked A and initialed I-IHG by Examiner H. I-I. Geller on the invoices accompanying the entries covered by the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in Schedule A, hereto attached and made a part thereof, consists of oven cleaner sticks exported from England between February 28, 1961 and April 12,1961.

> IT IS FURTHER. STIPULATED AND AGREED that on the dates of exportation of said merchandise to the United States, the price at the time of exportation at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold, or, in the absence of sales, offered for sale in the principal markets of the country of exportation, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other expenses incidental to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States was One Shilling, Eleven Pence each, less 25%, less 17%%, less 2%% packed.

> *450IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that all of the merchandise covered by all of the appeals for reappraisement the subject of this stipulation is not identified in the final list published by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54521.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that these appeals be submitted on this stipulation, said appeals being limited to the merchandise marked A as aforesaid.

On the agreed facts, I find export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved and that such value was 1 shilling, 11 pence each, less 25 per centum, less *l7y2*per centum, less *2y2*per centum, packed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
----

----

I Information

Commission

----

COMMON CATALOGUE OF AGRICULTURAL PLANT SPECIES

Fourth supplement to the 24th complete edition

(2006/C 167 A/01)

CONTENTS

Legend

List of agricultural species

I.   Beet

II.   Fodder plants

III.   Oil and fibre plants

IV.   Cereals

V.   Potatoes

----

LEGEND

----

(1)OJ C 68 A, 21.3.2006, p. 1. Catalogue as last amended by the third supplement (OJ C 146 A, 22.6.2006, p. 1).

(2)OJ L 193, 20.7.2002, p. 1. Directive as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 268, 18.10.2003, p. 1).

----

I

1.BETA VULGARIS L.

II

5.AGROSTIS STOLONIFERA L.

6.AGROSTIS CAPILLARIS L.

12.DACTYLIS GLOMERATA L.

14.FESTUCA OVINA L.

15.FESTUCA PRATENSIS HUDSON

16.FESTUCA RUBRA L.

17.LOLIUM MULTIFLORUM LAM.

18.LOLIUM PERENNE L.

19.LOLIUM × BOUCHEANUM KUNTH

22.PHLEUM PRATENSE L.

26.POA PRATENSIS L.

27.POA TRIVIALIS L.

31.LUPINUS ALBUS L.

32.LUPINUS ANGUSTIFOLIUS L.

33.LUPINUS LUTEUS L.

35.MEDICAGO SATIVA L.

37.ONOBRYCHIS VICIIFOLIA SCOP.

38.PISUM SATIVUM L. (PARTIM)

39.TRIFOLIUM ALEXANDRINUM L.

40.TRIFOLIUM HYBRIDUM L.

42.TRIFOLIUM PRATENSE L.

43.TRIFOLIUM REPENS L.

44.TRIFOLIUM RESUPINATUM L.

46.VICIA FABA L. (PARTIM)

53.RAPHANUS SATIVUS L. VAR. OLEIFORMIS PERS.

III

56.BRASSICA JUNCEA (L.) CZERNJ ET COSSON

57.BRASSICA NAPUS L. (PARTIM)

59.CANNABIS SATIVA L.

63.HELIANTHUS ANNUUS L.

64.LINUM USITATISSIMUM L.

65.PAPAVER SOMNIFERUM L.

66.SINAPIS ALBA L.

67.GLYCINE MAX (L.) MERRILL

IV

68.AVENA SATIVA L.

69.HORDEUM VULGARE L.

72.SECALE CEREALE L.

76.× TRITICOSECALE WITTM.

77.TRITICUM AESTIVUM L. EMEND. FIORI ET PAOL.

78.TRITICUM DURUM DESF.

79.TRITICUM SPELTA L.

80.ZEA MAYS L.

V

81.SOLANUM TUBEROSUM L.

----
No. 59487.

protest 254552-K (New York).

#### Rabl Co., Ltd. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial, the collector’s memorandum was received in evidence and the Government recommended that allowances be made accordingly. The memorandum states that there has been full compliance or waiver of compliance with the pertinent regulations and that, had the evidence been presented during the 90-day period when the protest was before the collector, the claim would have been allowed. On the record presented, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Before the First Division,

March 9, 1949

No. 52914.

#### Sandoz Chemical Works, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 142035-K (New York).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise in question is the same in all material respects as the estrogenic hormone passed upon in *Roche-Organon*v. *United States*(35 C. C. P. A. 99, C. A. D. 378). The claim at 10 percent under paragraph 34 was therefore sustained.
----

Opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee on The effects of international agreements to reduce greenhouse gas emissions on the industrial change processes in Europe

(2006/C 185/12)

On 10 February 2005, the European Economic and Social Committee, acting under Rule 29(2) of its Rules of Procedure, decided to draw up an opinion on: The effects of international agreements to reduce greenhouse gas emissions on the industrial change processes in Europe.

The Consultative Commission on Industrial Change, which was responsible for preparing the Committee's work on the subject, adopted its opinion on 30 January 2006. The rapporteur was Mr Zbořil and the co-rapporteur was Mr Činčera.

At its 426th plenary session held on 20 and 21 April 2006 (meeting of 20 April), the European Economic and Social Committee adopted the following opinion by 79 votes to 11 with nine abstentions.

1.   Introduction: the EU's goals in the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions

2.   Means to achieve EU objectives in the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions

3.   The consequences for industrial change of implementing the Kyoto Protocol and policies to limit climate change

4.   Conclusions and recommendations

Brussels, 20 April 2006.

The President

of the European Economic and Social Committee

Anne-Marie SIGMUND

----

(1)  IPCC Working Group 3 report ‘Climate Change 2001: Mitigation’, technical summary, p. 61.

(2)  Winning the Battle Against Global Climate Change: COM(2005)35, 9.2.2005, p. 15.

(3)OJ L 275/32, 25.10.2003.

(4)OJ L 283/33, 27.10.2001.

(5)OJ L 123/42, 17.5.2003.

(6)OJ L 525/50, 21.2.2004.

(7)  OJ 283/51, 31.10.2003.

(8)  COM(2003) 492 final.

(9)  Council Decision 2002/835/EC of 30 September 2002.

(10)  COM(2005)119, 6.4.2005.

----

APPENDIX

to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee

The following amendment, which received at least a quarter of the votes cast, was defeated in the course of the debates:

‘Point 4.13

Other instruments we consider effective include decarbonisation in electricity and heat production, with the support of other available fuels and energy sources, especially solar and hydrogen technologies, particularly in research and development, and increasing the safety of production and consumption systems ...’

Reason

Deletion of the reference to nuclear energy ties in with the amendment to point 2.6.

Voting

For: 25

Against: 54

Abstentions: 12.

----
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, J. Stephen Barley, President, Secretary and
Treasurer of Tuscany Minerals, Ltd., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

|(1) | the annual report on Form 10-KSB of Tuscany Minerals,
      Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies
      with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
      Act of 1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Tuscany Minerals, Ltd.                                                                 



Dated: April 2, 2007

/s/ J. Stephen Barley

J. Stephen Barley President, Secretary and Treasurer
(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Tuscany
Minerals, Ltd. and will be retained by Tuscany Minerals, Ltd. and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
(Reap. Dec. 10968)

#### R. J. Saunders & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 823779.

(Decided May 4, 1965)

*Sharp é B off cm*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Rao, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the undersigned, subject to the approval of the Court:

> 1. That the subject merchandise consists of hardboard exported from Sweden as to which the Secretary of the Treasury issued a finding of dumping, published in 89 TD 197, TD 53567, made pursuant to the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C., 160, etseq.).

> 2. That pursuant to Section 168 of said Antidumping Act, the appraiser reported the purchase price (Sec. 162) and the foreign market value (Sec. 164) as to the merchandise listed on Schedule A attached hereto and made a part hereof.

> *6383. That pursuant to Sections 600 and 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, the appraiser appraised all of the merchandise in the appeals for appraisement enumerated on Schedule A for regular duty purposes.

> 4. That the plaintiff duly filed appeals for reappraisement as to the values referred to in the above paragraphs Nos. 2 and 3.

> 5. That at the times relevant herein the purchase price and the foreign market value under the said Antidumping Act are as specified in the aforesaid Schedule A attached hereto.

> 6. That as to all other items of merchandise not identified on Schedule A, the appraiser’s reports of purchase price and of foreign market value are correct.

> 7. That the appraiser’s findings of value under the provisions of Section 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, are correct.

> 8. That said appeals are submitted for decision upon this stipulation and said Schedule A.

Upon the agreed facts, I find foreign market value, as defined in section 164 of the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C. § 164), for the merchandise described in schedule A, annexed to this decision and made a part hereof, and the purchase price thereof, within section 162 of said act (19 U.S.C. § 162), to be as indicated in said schedule. As to all other items of merchandise not identified in schedule A, I find the foreign market values and purchase prices to he as reported by the appraiser. In all other respects, the values of all merchandise are as returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
**2**

**2**

Number

Amount

of bids
FY2009 Appendix to Semtech Corporation CEO Bonus Plan



 Exhibit 10.2 
 SEMTECH CORPORATION 
 CEO BONUS PLAN 
 APPENDICES 
  

	A.	OPERATING INCOME APPENDIX FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009 

 Adopted by
the Compensation Committee on June 26, 2008 
  

				
	 FY2009 Operating Income
 as
a Percentage of
 FY2008 Operating
 Income
	  	Operating
Income
Performance
Factor	 
	 0 to 100%
	  	0	%
	 105%
	  	80	%
	 119%
	  	90	%
	 133%
	  	100	%
	 169%
	  	148	%
	 250% or above
	  	250	%

 For purposes of this Appendix, Operating Income for each fiscal year is as determined by the Committee in
accordance with Exhibit A of the Plan. 
  

	B.	TARGET LEVEL APPENDIX 

 For Fiscal Year 2009, the
CEO’s Target Level is 125% of the CEO’s annual base salary. 
  

	C.	PEER GROUP APPENDIX FOR FISCAL YEAR 2009 

 The Peer Group for Fiscal Year
2009 shall be the following companies: 
 Analog Devices (ADI) 
 Linear Technology Corp. (LLTC) 
 Intersil Corp. (ISIL) 
 Maxim Integrated Products Inc. (MXIM) 
 Micrel Inc. (MCRL) 
 Microsemi Corp. (MSCC) 
 National Semiconductor
Corp. (NSM) 
 Power Integrations Inc. (POWI) 
  

 1 of 2 








 The Performance Relative to Peers Factor for Fiscal Year 2009 will be determined according to the following table:

  

						
	 Company Revenue Growth
 Ranking,
Relative to Peer
 Group
	  	 Company Earnings Per Share
 Growth Ranking, Relative to Peer
 Group
	  	Performance Relative to
Peers Factor	 
	 Below 50th percentile
	  	 Below 50th percentile
	  	0	%
	 Below 50th percentile
	  	 At or above 50th
percentile
	  	50	%
	 At or above 50th
percentile
	  	 Below 50th percentile
	  	50	%
	 At or above 50th percentile, but less
than 75th percentile
	  	 At or above 50th percentile, but less
than 75th percentile
	  	100	%
	 At or above 75th
percentile
	  	 At or above 50th percentile, but less
than 75th percentile
	  	150	%
	 At or above 50th percentile, but less
than 75th percentile
	  	 At or above 75th
percentile
	  	150	%
	 At or above 75th
percentile
	  	 At or above 75th
percentile
	  	200	%

  

 2 of 2
----

Non-opposition to a notified concentration

(Case COMP/M.4160 — Thyssenkrupp/EADS/Atlas)

(2006/C 177/18)

(Text with EEA relevance)

On 10 May 2006, the Commission decided not to oppose the above notified concentration and to declare it compatible with the common market. This decision is based on Article 6(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004. The full text of the decision is available only in English and will be made public after it is cleared of any business secrets it may contain. It will be available:

----
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

HENRI GUERIN,

Appellant,

v.

ISAAC GILMORE,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-265

[March 31, 2021]

Appeal from the County Court, Broward County, Seventeenth Judicial 

Circuit; Giuseppina Miranda, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. CACE 20-2571 and 

COCE 19-21109.

Henri Guerin, Hollywood, pro se.

Isaac Gilmore, Hollywood, pro se.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 

1150 (Fla. 1979).

WARNER, GROSS and ARTAU, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.