alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Maureen D. Howley, Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President of the Managing Owner,
Preferred Investment Solutions Corp. (the Managing Owner), of World Monitor Trust  Series B (Series B), hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



| | (1) | Series Bs Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Quarterly
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Series B.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                   
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                   
|/s/ Maureen D. Howley                                                              
|Maureen D. Howley Chief Financial Officer and Senior
Vice President August 14, 2006
vvi-ex10j1_442.htm



Exhibit 10.J1

 

VIAD CORP

SUMMARY OF COMPENSATION PROGRAM FOR

NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS 

AS OF FEBRUARY 25, 2020

 


		
	
Board of Directors
	
 

	
     Annual Retainer
	
$65,000

	
     Per Meeting Attendance Fee (for special meetings in excess of 8 in one calendar year)
	
$1,500

	
     Annual Restricted Stock Grant1Value 
	
$125,000

	
 
	
 

	
Independent Chairman of Board of Directors
	
 

	
     Annual Retainer
	
$100,000

	
 
	
 

	
Audit Committee
	
 

	
     Committee Membership Annual Retainer
	
$20,500

	
     Committee Chairman Annual Retainer
	
$25,000

	
 
	
 

	
Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee
	
 

	
     Committee Membership Annual Retainer
	
$5,000

	
     Committee Chairman Annual Retainer
	
$15,000

	
 
	
 

	
Human Resources Committee
	
 

	
     Committee Membership Annual Retainer
	
$10,000

	
     Committee Chairman Annual Retainer
	
$20,000




 

 

Additional Benefits2

 

---------------------


	
1
	
The annual restricted stock grant occurs in February of each year and vests 100% one year from the date of the grant, in accordance with the terms and conditions of the forms of the Restricted Stock Agreement for Non-Employee Directors, effective as of February 27, 2018, pursuant to the 2017 Viad Corp Omnibus Incentive Plan, filed as Exhibit 10.1 to Viad Corp’s Form 8-K filed May 23, 2017; or the successor form of such restricted stock agreement filed thereafter.  




 


	
2
	
Non-employee directors may participate in the Directors' Matching Gift Program, which provides for corporate matching of charitable contributions made by non-employee directors, on a dollar-for-dollar basis, up to an aggregate maximum of $5,000 per year to qualified non-profit organizations having tax exempt status under Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. Viad Corp also provides non-employee directors with accidental death and dismemberment insurance benefits of $300,000 and travel accident insurance benefits of $300,000 when they are traveling on corporate business.
No. 51369.

#### Protests 92197-K, etc., of H. P. Lambert Co. et al. (Boston).

Opinion by

Keefe. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decisions cited, the following allowances were made to compensate for the weight of the inedible substance on the outside of the cheese: (1) *2y¿*percent for the cheese similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Scaramelli*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706), Abstract 42146, and Abstract 48269; and (2) 1 percent for the cheese similar to the Reggiano cheese the subject of *Scaramelli*v. *United States, supra.*The protests were sustained to this extent.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from
Indiana Gas Company, Inc.'s consolidated financial statements as of
December 31, 1999, and for the fiscal year then ended and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      597,417
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                          0
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         123,892
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        18,561
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 739,870
<COMMON>                                       142,995
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                            0
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            105,627
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                 248,622
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                           211,849
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                   0
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                  82,172
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                        0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                 197,227
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  739,870
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                      431,361
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            16,734
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     368,926
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                     385,660
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                         45,701
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               1,010
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                  46,711
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        19,969
<NET-INCOME>                                    29,742
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                   29,742
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                        27,000
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       13,109
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                          36,831
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
**Exhibit 23**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTEREDPUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

     We have issuedour reports dated December 12, 2007, which contained an emphasis of matter paragraph related to the Company’s liquidity, accompanying the consolidated financialstatements and schedule in the Annual Report of Innovex, Inc. and subsidiarieson Form 10-K for the year ended September 29, 2007. We hereby consent to theincorporation by reference of said reports in the Registration Statements ofInnovex, Inc. and subsidiaries on Forms S-8 (File No. 33-14776, effective June3, 1987, File No. 33-27530, effective March 17, 1989, File No. 33-59035,effective May 2, 1995, File No. 333-10045, effective August 13, 1996, File No.333-10047, effective August 13, 1996, File No. 333-79427, effective May 27,1999, File No. 333-37380, effective May 19, 2000, File No. 333-68228, effectiveAugust 23, 2001, File No. 333-83452, effective February 27, 2002 and File No.333-112648, effective February 10, 2004) and Forms S-3 (No. 333-106734,effective July 22, 2003 and File No. 333-121981, effective January 12, 2005).

 

 

Minneapolis, Minnesota
EXHIBIT 32.2


            CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

          In connection with the Quarterly Report of Circle Group Holdings, Inc.
on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Quarterly Report"),
I, Dana L. Dabney, Chief Financial Officer of the Circle Group Holdings, Inc.
certify, pursuant Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

               (1)  The Quarterly Report fully complies with the requirements of
          Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

               (2)  The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly
          presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
          results of operations of Circle Group Holdings, Inc.

Dated:  November 10, 2004                          /s/ Dana L. Dabney
                                                   ------------------
                                                   Dana L. Dabney
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
                                                   (Principal Financial Officer)
Case 2:05-cr-00193-PD Document 1054 Filed 12/13/07 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:05-cr-00193-PD Document 1054 Filed 12/13/07 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JOHN WELLS

v.

JAMES WYNDER, et al.

: CIVIL ACTION 

:

: NO. 05-5542

: 

:

ORDER

AND NOW, this 6th day of June, 2006, upon careful and independent consideration

of the pleadings and the record herein, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of

United States Magistrate Judge Peter B. Scuderi, and having received no objections thereto, it is

ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, is

DISMISSED.

3. There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability.

BY THE COURT:

 S/ BRUCE W. KAUFFMAN 

BRUCE W. KAUFFMAN, J.

Case 2:05-cv-05542-BWK Document 9 Filed 06/06/06 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 220 (Thursday, November 16, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 78799-78800]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-25258]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service

[[Page 78800]]

Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products 
List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 16, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 8, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] Contract 
102 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at 
www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-48, CP2024-48.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2023-25258 Filed 11-15-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Case 2:02-cv-04444-PBT     Document 21      Filed 10/14/2004     Page 1 of 3

Case 2:02-cv-04444-PBT     Document 21      Filed 10/14/2004     Page 2 of 3

Case 2:02-cv-04444-PBT     Document 21      Filed 10/14/2004     Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 32.2CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)**The undersigned executive officer of First BancTrust Corporation (the “Registrant”) herebycertifies that the Registrant’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 fully complies withthe requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the informationcontained therein fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Registrant.                           /s/ Ellen M. Litteral   Name:  Ellen M. Litteral   Title:  Chief Financial Officer andTreasurer   Date: March 27, 2008
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

 JOYCE R. MONGER : CIVIL ACTION

Plaintiff :

: NO. 02-CV-2757

 vs. :

:

SALOMON J. BERENHOLZ :

Defendant :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 3rd day of December, 2002, upon consideration of the parties

Stipulated Motion for Extension of Discovery (Document No. 9), it is ORDERED that the

motion is GRANTED in part.

1. The Discovery deadline is extended to January 17, 2003.

2. All motions for summary judgment shall be filed no later than January 17,

2003, responses to any such motions shall be filed within the time permitted under Local

Rule 7.1(c). Motions for summary judgment and responses shall be filed in the form

prescribed in the Court’s Notice to Counsel and Judge Savage’s Scheduling and Motion

Policies and Procedures.

(a) The movant shall file, in support of the motion for summary judgment,

a Statement of Undisputed Facts which sets forth, in numbered paragraphs, all material

facts which the movant contends are undisputed;

(b) The respondent shall file, in opposition to the motion for summary

judgment, a separate Statement of Disputed Facts, responding to the numbered

paragraphs set forth in the movant’s Statement of Undisputed Facts, which the respondent

Case 2:02-cv-02757-TJS Document 10 Filed 12/04/2002 Page 1 of 2
contend present a genuine issue to be tried. The respondent also shall set forth, in

separate numbered paragraphs, any additional facts which the respondent contends

preclude summary judgment.

(c) All material facts set forth in the Statement of Undisputed Facts

required to be served by the movant shall be taken by the Court as admitted unless

controverted by the opposing party.

(d) Statements of material facts in support of or in opposition to a motion

for summary judgment shall include specific and not general references to the parts of the

record which support each of the statements. Each stated fact and each statement that a

material fact is disputed shall cite the source relied upon, including the title page and line

of the document supporting the statement.

3. In all other respects, the Scheduling Order entered on August 16, 2002 shall

remain in effect.

BY THE COURT:

 

TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE, J.

Case 2:02-cv-02757-TJS Document 10 Filed 12/04/2002 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 31

                        Certification

I, Douglas O. Hart, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K
containing distribution or servicing reports filed in respect of periods
included in the year covered by this annual report, of the MBNA Credit Card
Master Note Trust;

2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole,
does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to
be provided to the trustee by the servicer under the pooling and servicing, or
similar, agreement, for inclusion in these reports is included in these reports;

4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the servicer
under the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement, and based upon my
knowledge and the annual compliance review required under that agreement, and
except as disclosed in the reports, the servicer has fulfilled its obligations
under that servicing agreement; and

5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the servicer's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report provided
by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance
with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar
procedure, as set forth in the pooling and servicing, or similar, agreement,
that is included in these reports.

Date:  September 22, 2005


/s/ Douglas O. Hart
Douglas O. Hart
Senior Executive Vice President
J. C AMPBELL B ARKER

D EPUTY S OLICITOR G ENERAL (512) 936

- 0596

CAM

. BARKER @ TEXASATTORNEYGENERAL

. GOV

November 24 , 2015

Mr. Jeffrey D. Kyle , Clerk

Court of Appeals for the Third Judicial District of Texas

P.O. Box 12547

Austin, Texas 78711

- 2547

Re: No. 03

- 15

- 00401

- CV, In re Xerox Corp.

No. 03

- 15

- 00252

- CV, Nazari v. State of Texas v. Xerox Corp.

Dear Mr. Kyle :

Pursuant to the Court’s order of November 20, 2015, the parties

in the two above

- cited causes have agreed on an order and division of

oral argument

, as follows:

No. 03

- 15

- 00401 -CV, In re Xerox Corporation (30 min. total):

Xerox : 12 min.

State of Texas: 15 min.

Xerox rebuttal: 3 min.

No. 03

- 15

- 00252 -CV, State v. Nazari (30 min. total):

Nazari: 10 min.

Xerox: 4 min.

State of Texas: 13 min.

Nazari rebuttal: 3 min.

Additionally, please let this letter serve as notice that Raymond

C. Winter will present oral argument on behalf of the State of Texas in

No. 03

- 15

- 00401

- CV, and that the undersigned, J. Campbell Barker,

will present oral argument on behalf of the State of Texas in No. 03

- 15

-

00252

- CV.

Pos t Of fic e Bo x 12548

, Austin

, T exa s 7 8 7 1 1 - 2 5 4 8 • ( 5 1 2 ) 4 6 3 - 2 1 0 0 • ww w .texasatto r neygeneral.go v ACCEPTED

03-15-00252-CV

7971932

THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS

11/24/2015 1:27:16 PM

JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERKLetter to Mr. Jeffrey D. Kyle , Clerk

November 2 4 , 2015

Page 2

Sincerely,

/s/ J. Campbell Barker

J. Campbell Barker

Counsel for the State of Texas

cc: All counsel of record

Pos t O f fic e Bo x 12548

, Austin

, T exa s 7 8 7 1 1

- 2 5 4 8 • ( 5 1 2 ) 4 6 3

- 2 1 0 0 • ww w .texasatto r neygeneral.go v
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 22, 2016

No. 04-16-00635-CV

Frank GARZA,

Appellant

v.

Kris Angel FINN,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 10, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2016CV04020

The Honorable Robert Behrens, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellant’s brief was due November 14, 2016. Neither the brief nor a motion for 

extension of time to file the brief has been filed. 

Accordingly, we ORDER appellant to file his appellant’s brief and a written response 

reasonably explaining his failure to timely file the brief in this court on or before December 22. 

2016. If appellant fails to file a brief and the written response by the date ordered, we will 

dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(a). 

We order the clerk of this court to serve a copy of this brief on appellant and appellee’s 

counsel. 

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 22nd day of November, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE : CIVIL ACTION

INSURANCE CO., et al., : NO. 05-5368

:

Plaintiffs, :

:

v. :

:

ARNOLD LINCOW, et al., :

:

Defendants. :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 16th day of June, 2011, it is hereby

ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ objections (doc. no. 1070) to Judge

Rueter’s memorandum and order (doc. no. 1068) are SUSTAINED in

part and OVERRULED in part as follows:

1) Plaintiffs’ objections are OVERRULED with respect to

the TD Ameritrade IRA Account;

2) Plaintiffs’ objections are SUSTAINED with respect to

the AXA Equitable IRA Account. Judge Rueter’s

memorandum is hereby VACATED to the extent it orders

the AXA Equitable IRA Account exempt from execution of

the judgment;

3) Judge Rueter shall prepare a report and recommendation

concerning Defendant’s exemption claim for the AXA

Equitable IRA Account.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

 S/Eduardo C. Robreno 

 EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, J.
# C_2016462EN.01002401.xml

| 12.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 462/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 462/24

---

Order of the General Court of 18 October 2016 — Laboratoire de la mer v EUIPO — Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma (RESPIMER)

(Case T-109/16) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark RESPIMER - Earlier EU word mark RESPIMAT - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law))

(2016/C 462/31)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Laboratoire de la mer (Saint-Malo, France) (represented by: S. Szilvasi, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Hanf, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG (Ingelheim, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 January 2016 (Case R 3109/2014-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma and Laboratoire de la mer.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Laboratoire de la mer to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Laboratoire de la mer to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 165, 10.5.2016.

1

---
No. 51950.

#### Siegfried Lowenthal Co. *v.*United States,

protests 109710-K, etc. (Cleveland).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial counsel for the Government moved to dismiss the protests upon the ground that the affidavits required by the statute were not filed within the time prescribed by law. The filing of an affidavit within 15 days after the delivery of 'the merchandise is a condition imposed by the statute to be complied with by the importer before the collector is authorized to make an allowance in duties. It was held that a failure on the part of the importer to meet the condition does not affect the validity of the protests. (Abstract 38332 cited.) The motion to dismiss was therefore denied. Inasmuch, however, as the statute specifically prohibits any allowance, constructive or otherwise, for loss of liquors caused by breakage, leakage, or damage, except when an. affidavit is filed within the time prescribed, the court was unable to grant any relief. The protest was therefore overruled.