alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2018352EN.01003202.xml

| 1.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 352/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.10.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 352/32

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 July 2018 — Cyprus v EUIPO — Papouis Dairies (Pallas Halloumi)

(Case T-825/16) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark Pallas Halloumi - Prior United Kingdom word certification mark HALLOUMI - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)))

(2018/C 352/38)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Republic of Cyprus (represented by: S. Malynicz, QC, and V. Marsland, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Papouis Dairies Ltd (Nicosia, Cyprus) (represented by: N. Korogiannakis, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against an appeal brought before the Fourth Chamber of the Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 September 2016 (Case R 2065/2014-4), relating to opposition proceedings between the Republic of Cyprus and Papouis Dairies.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Republic of Cyprus to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Republic of Cyprus to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 22, 23.1.2017.

---
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I, CARL H. DELACATO, JR., ESQUIRE, hereby certify that on the 22nd day of 

December, 2003, a true and correct copy of the foregoing Answer to Plaintiff’s Motion for 

Reconsideration was served via first-class United States mail upon the following: 

Francis X. Nolan, Esquire 

VAUGHAN DUFFY & CONNORS, LLP 

102 Pickering Way, Suite 400 

Exton, PA 19341 

Frank J. Marcone, Esquire 

ATTORNEY AT LAW

127 Chester Pike 

Ridley Park, PA 19078 

Phillip A. Charamella, Esquire 

LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL D. FIORETTI

The Bourse Building 

111 South Independence Mall East 

Suite 790 

Philadelphia, PA 19106-2323 

 ____________________________________ 

 CARL H. DELACATO, JR. 

Case 2:02-cv-04388-JF Document 29-3 Filed 12/22/2003 Page 1 of 1
# sec5_sf133_schp_2019

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2019-14	&"Arial,Bold"&9V SF 133/Sch P - &P	&"Arial,Bold"&10IRC Handout July 11, 2019
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002**

 

I,Philip C. S. Yin, certify that:

 

1.I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of AXT, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of theend of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee ofthe registrant’s board of directors:

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Dated:  May 12, 2006 | By:    | /s/  Philip C. S. Yin    |
|----------------------|--------|--------------------------|
|                 |   | Philip  C. S. Yin        |
|                 |   | Chief  Executive Officer |

 

----
No. 55870.

protests 170452-K and 171163-K (New York).

#### Kopf Mfg. Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

*314Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of parts of saddles, which saddles are in part of pigskin and valued at more than $40 each, similar in all material respects -to those the subject of Abstract 54419, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
**Exhibit31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Stephen K. Gartside, Jr., certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form10-Q of Evolving Systems, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does notcontain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) andI are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

 

(a) Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.        Theregistrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a) All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud, whether ornot material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Date: May 10, 2004                    |
|---------------------------------------|
|                                  |
| /s/ STEPHEN K. GARTSIDE, JR.          |   |
| Stephen K. Gartside, Jr.              |
| President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
No. 61295.

protests 296392-K, etc. (New York).

#### Brioner & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that the facts and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc:*(34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, were not in fact received by the importers. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited it was held that duty and internal revenue tax are not assessable upon such portions of the merchandise as were reported by the inspector as not found. The protests were sustained to this extent.
May17, 2015 The Honorable Anthony Foxx Secretary ofTransportation United States Department ofTransportation 1200 New JerseyAvenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Re: Docket No. DOT-OST-2015-0082 Dear Secretary Foxx, Right now, Delta, American and United Airlines are asking the government to renegotiate the Open Skies agreements. By doing so they are trying to freeze various foreign airlines from offering routes to international travelers by restricting their access during the reevaluation period. I do notbelieve these three companies should have thepower to do this simplybecause they cannot or choose not to compete. Ifthese major US airlines get theirway it will harmtravelers, especially those who travel internationallyfor business or leisure. They will have fewer flight options available andwill beforced to spend more onfares. Direct flights will be reduced so travel time will lengthen. The goal is to limit the amount ofcompetition, which has been wonderful for lowering fares by 32% for companies who participate in Open Skies. In short, Open Skies has been beneficial for travelers and the economy. Unfortunately, byhonoring this request bythe major US airlines, bothwill suffer. When it comes do\'VTI to it, travelers need to have choices. By limiting their choices, and forcing them to paymore to travel, each and every airline companywill suffer. Travelers should not be forced to suffer with higher costs and longertravel times simplybecause some airlines do notwant to compete. Itis crucial for you to prevent this from happening so that our ability to travel is notburdened even further. Keep Open Skies the same as it has beenfor the past 20 years. Thankyou, 

# ltL-r

**3~~** Dr. Kay Browne

Dr. Kay Browne 116 Reed Boulevard • Mill Valley, CA 94941
EXHIBIT 32.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In  connection  with the Annual  Report on Form 10-K of Saucony,  Inc. (the
"Company")  for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  Michael Umana, Chief
Financial  Officer  of the  Company,  hereby  certifies,  pursuant  to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material  respects,   the  financial  condition  and  results  of  the
          operations of the Company.



Dated:  March 16, 2005                            /s/ Michael Umana
                                                   Michael Umana
                                                   Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of IQ Biometrix, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSBFC for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, William Scigliano,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.


                                        /s/ William Scigliano
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        William Scigliano
                                        Chief Executive Officer

May 17, 2004
CAR REVIEW

REVIEWER OPTIONS

Request Revision Unapprove Section

Review Tips:

 Does the state provide complete and accurate performance data for this indicator?

 When compared to previous year performance data, does the data reflect similar characteristics, trends and patterns?

 Are the same categories of students reported this year, as compared to last year?

 Can you detect any significant discrepancies in the numbers reported? For instance, are some of the numbers excessive or 

extremely small compared to what has been reported in the previous year?

REPORT REVIEW

7a. Performance Data -

A B C D E F

Line Population

Number of 

Students

in the 

Numerator

Number of 

Students

in the 

Denominator

State Target 

Level of 

Performance

Actual

Level of 

Performance

Difference

Between 

State Actual & 

Target in 

Percentage

Met 90% of 

Adjusted 

Level of 

Performance 

(Y,N)

1 Grand Total

2 GENDER

3 Male

4 Female

5 RACE/ETHNICITY* (1997 Revised Standards)

6

American Indian 

or Alaskan 

Native

7 Asian

8

Black or African 

American

9 Hispanic/Latino

10

Native Hawaiian 

or Other Pacific 

Islander

11 White

12

Two or More 

Races

13 SPECIAL POPULATION AND OTHER STUDENT CATEGORIES

14

Individuals With 

Disabilities 

(ADA)

15

Disability Status 

(ESEA/IDEA)

16 Economically 
A B C D E F

Line Population

Number of 

Students

in the 

Numerator

Number of 

Students

in the 

Denominator

State Target 

Level of 

Performance

Actual

Level of 

Performance

Difference

Between 

State Actual & 

Target in 

Percentage

Met 90% of 

Adjusted 

Level of 

Performance 

(Y,N)

Disadvantaged

17 Single Parents

18

Displaced 

Homemakers

19

Limited English 

Proficient

20 Migrant Status

21

Nontraditional 

Enrollees

Additional Information:

Public Burden Statement:

According to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information 

unless such collection displays a valid OMB control number. The valid OMB control number for this information 

collection is 1830-0569. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 174 hours 

per response, including time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the 

data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. The obligation to respond to this collection 

is required to obtain or retain benefit (Carl D. Perkins Career and Technical Education Act of 2006 (Perkins IV) (20 

U.S. C. 2301 et seq. as amended by P.L. 109-270). If you have comments or concerns regarding the status of your 

individual submission of this APR, please contact (Office of Career, Technical and Adult Education; Director, Division of 

Academic and Technical Education; 550 12th Street, SW; Washington, D.C. 20202 directly. [Note: Please do not return 

the completed report to this address.]
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 1SUPPLEMENT	&"Arial,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2023 ReportingSection VII

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2023-11	&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000DRAFT &K000000VII CER - &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout 8/23/23
Exhibit 10.19
 AMENDED AND RESTATED
SEVERANCE AND CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT
 Amended and Restated Severance and Change in Control
Agreement  Agreement   Effective Date  Anadys Pharmaceuticals,
Inc.  Company  Stephen T.
Worland, Ph.D. Executive  Parties   Party  Prior Agreement
 Recitals
 Whereas
 Whereas
 Whereas
 Now, Therefore ,
 Agreement
 1. Employment.
 1.1 Loyalty; At Will Employment.
 1.2 Termination of Obligations.
 1.




---



##### 



1.3
 2. Definitions.
  2.1 Cause.  Cause 
 (i)
 (ii)
 (iii)
 (iv) Proprietary
Information and Inventions Agreement
 2.2 Change in Control. Change in Control
 (i)
 2.




---



##### 



(ii)
 (iii)
 2.3 Complete Disability.  Complete Disability   Complete
Disability 
 2.4 Good Reason.  Good Reason 
 3.




---



##### 



(i)
 (ii)
 (iii)
 (iv)
 2.5 Integration
 3. Compensation Upon
Termination.
 3.1 Death Or Complete Disability.
 3.2 With Cause or Without Good Reason.
 3.3 Without Cause or for Good Reason.
 4.




---



##### 



Release
 (i) Base Salary
 (ii) COBRA COBRA Payment Period provided, however,
 Health Care Benefit Payment
 (iii)
 5.




---



##### 



(iv)
 3.4 Additional Change in Control Related Severance Benefits.
 (i) Bonus
Plan Bonus Payment
 (ii)
 6.




---



##### 



4. Tax Compliance
 4.1 Application of Internal Revenue Code Section 409A. Code Section 409A
 4.2 Parachute Payment. Payment Excise Tax Reduced Amount
   7.




---



##### 



5. Company
Property.
 6. Other Terminations.
 7. Acknowledgement.
 8. General.
 8.




---



##### 



In
Witness Whereof ,
 Anadys Pharmaceuticals, Inc./s/ Marios FotiadisBy:  Marios FotiadisIts:Chairman, Compensation Committee EXECUTIVE:/s/ Stephen T. WorlandStephen T. Worland, Ph.D. 9.




---



##### 



EXHIBIT A
 RELEASE AND WAIVER OF CLAIMS
 Anadys Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Company Release and Waiver
 ADEA
 A general release does not extend to claims which the creditor does not
know or suspect to exist in his or her favor at the time of executing the release, which if known
by him or her must have materially affected his or her settlement with the debtor.
 10.




---



##### 



Date: __________________
    
    By: ________________________
 11.
T HIS P LACE -H OLDER P AGE REPLACES THE P HYSICO

C HEMICAL P ROPERTIES S UMMARY R EPORT CLAIMED CBI

(1 PAGE )
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1617 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1617

To designate the checkpoint of the United States Border Patrol located 
  on United States Highway 77 North in Sarita, Texas, as the ``Javier 
                 Vega, Jr. Border Patrol Checkpoint''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 24, 2017

 Mr. Cornyn (for himself, Mr. Tester, Mr. Johnson, Mrs. McCaskill, Mr. 
  Tillis, Ms. Heitkamp, and Mr. Cruz) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To designate the checkpoint of the United States Border Patrol located 
  on United States Highway 77 North in Sarita, Texas, as the ``Javier 
                 Vega, Jr. Border Patrol Checkpoint''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Javier Vega, Jr. Memorial Act of 
2017''.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

    Congress finds the following:
            (1) A native of La Feria, Texas, Border Patrol Agent Javier 
        Vega, Jr., served his country first a member of the United 
        States Marines Corps and then proudly as a border patrol agent 
        in the canine division with his dog, Goldie.
            (2) Agent Vega was assigned to the Kingsville, Texas, 
        Border Patrol Station as a canine handler and worked primarily 
        at the Sarita Border Patrol Checkpoint.
            (3) On August 3, 2014, Agent Vega was on a fishing trip 
        with his family near Raymondville, Texas, when 2 criminal 
        aliens attempted to rob and attack them.
            (4) Agent Vega was shot and killed while attempting to 
        subdue the assailants and protecting his family.
            (5) Agent Vega is survived by his wife, parents, 3 sons, 
        brother, sister-in-law, niece, and dog, Goldie.

SEC. 3. DESIGNATION.

    The checkpoint of the United States Border Patrol located on United 
States Highway 77 North in Sarita, Texas, shall be known and designated 
as the ``Javier Vega, Jr. Border Patrol Checkpoint''.

SEC. 4. REFERENCES.

    Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, paper, or other 
record of the United States to the checkpoint described in section 3 
shall be deemed to be a reference to the ``Javier Vega, Jr. Border 
Patrol Checkpoint''.
                                 <all>
```
Page 1 of 2

Bulletin No. 2022-10

To: Heads of Government Departments, Agencies, and Others Concerned

Subject: Change to U.S. Standard General Ledger (USSGL) — A Treasury Financial Manual (TFM) 

Supplement

1. Purpose: This bulletin notifies agencies that Part 2 of the USSGL Supplement have been revised for 

Fiscal Year (FY) 2022.

2. Summary of Changes: The Summary of Changes identifies specific revisions made to the USSGL. 

3. Changes by Part/Section/File:

Part 2 - FY 2022 Reporting changes to files in Sections III, IV, V, and VII:

Section III: Account Transactions

 Transaction Listing

 Transactions

 T-Accounts

Section IV: Account Attributes for USSGL Proprietary Account and Budgetary Account Reporting

 USSGL Account Attribute Table

Section V: Crosswalks to Standard External Reports for FY 2022 GTAS Reporting

OMB Form and Content:

 Statement of Budgetary Resources

 SF 133 and Schedule P: Report on Budget Execution and Budgetary Resources and Budget 

Program and Financing Schedule

Section VII: GTAS Validations and Edits for FY 2022 Reporting

 Validations Detail

 Validations Summary

 Edits Detail
Page 2 of 2

 Edits Summary

4. Effective Date:

 Part 2 requirements for FY 2022 are effective immediately.

5. Inquiries:

Direct questions concerning this bulletin to your agency's USSGL Board representative or:

Chris Beck

Director, General Ledger and Intragovernmental Transaction Division

Fiscal Accounting

Bureau of the Fiscal Service

PO Box 1328

Parkersburg, WV 26106-1328

Email: USSGLTeam@fiscal.treasury.gov

Date: March 17, 2022
BLACKWATER SECURITY CONSULTING, LLC et al v. WESTCHESTER SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY et al Doc. 81 Att. 1

Dockets.Justia.com