alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Part 2 DRAFT

4

USSGL 

Account 

Number Begin/End

Auth Type 

Code Fed/NonFed

USSGL 

Account 

Number Begin/End

Auth Type 

Code Fed/NonFed

119305 E 417200 E P F

119306 E 417200 E S F

119309 E 435400 E P

404400 E 439701 E P

417100 E P F

417100 E S F

Left Side Attribute Combination Right Side Attribute Combination

Fund Resources Equals Fund Equities

The sum of USSGL accounts that comprise Fund Resources must equal the sum of USSGL accounts that constitute Fund 

Equities.

SS: USSGL / USSGL

Equal (=)

10, 11, 12

01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09

Rule Name:

Description:

Type:

Operand:

Fatal Period:

Proposed Analytical 

Period:

Edit Rule Number:

Fiscal Year 2020 Reporting

Section VII

U.S. Standard General Ledger

Data Edits - Detail Report

SUPPLEMENT

Bulletin No. 2020-08 DRAFT VII EDR - 1 IRC Handout 12/5/19
Part 2 DRAFT

SUPPLEMENT

Edit Rule Number: 68

Rule Name:

Description:

Type:

Operand:

Fatal Period:

Proposed Analytical 

Period:

Statement Line Number Operand BETC

USSGL account 411300 - Appropriated 

Receipts Derived from 

Unavailable Trust or Special 

Fund Receipts

+ APSPCEXP

USSGL account 435500 - Cancellation of 

Appropriation From 

Unavailable Receipts

+ SRRCTEXP

USSGL account 438700 - Temporary 

Reduction of Appropriaton 

from Unavailable Receipts, 

New Budget Authority

+ SRRTYEDR

USSGL account 438800 - Temporay Reduction 

of Appropriation from 

Unavailable Receipts, PriorYear Balance

+

LS: Statement Line / SMAF

Equal (=)

01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 11, 12

Left Side Attribute Combination Right Side Attribute Combination

The sum of the ending balances in USSGL accounts 411300, 435500, 438700, and 438800 must equal the balance of 

BETCs related to Unappropriated Special and Trust Funds in CARS.

Fiscal Year 2020 Reporting

Section VII

U.S. Standard General Ledger

Data Edits - Detail Report

Budgetary Resources Derived from Unavailable Unappropriated Special and Trust Fund Receipt Accounts

Bulletin No. 2020-08 DRAFT VII EDR - 2 IRC Handout 12/5/19
# Bulletin No. 2017-04

&"Arial,Bold"&12U.S. Standard General LedgerSummary of Changes	

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2017-04	&"Arial,Bold"&P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout 03/02/17

# Additional Information

&"Arial,Bold"&12U.S. Standard General LedgerSummary of Changes	

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2017-04	&"Arial,Bold"&P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout 03/02/17
No. 63038.

#### Mondial Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 58/6885 (A) (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of sprats in oil, packed in tins, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Arnold Sorenson Co., Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 199, C.D. 1862), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 50004.

#### Protests 55327-K, etc., of Copeland & Thompson, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise in question is similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Copeland & Thompson*v. *United States*(12 Cust. Ct. 85, C. D. 833). In accordance therewith the merchandise was held dutiable as claimed.
Letter Agreement between American Media, Inc. and Michael Porche



 Exhibit 10.27 
 August 27, 2007 
 Mr. Michael Porche 
 President 
 Distribution Services Inc. 
 Dear Mike:

 We are pleased to offer you the following bonus package for FY 2008. In developing this package, we seek to fully align your goals with the goals of AMI.

 Target bonus is $87,500.00 for FY 2008. 
  

	 	•	 	 Hit $*** newsstand net profits earn 50% of targeted bonus ($43,750.00). 


  

	 	•	 	 Hit $*** newsstand net profits earn 75% of targeted bonus ($65,625.00). 


  

	 	•	 	 Hit $*** newsstand net profits earn 100% of targeted bonus ($87,500.00). 


  

	 	•	 	 Hit $*** newsstand net profits earn $125% of targeted bonus ($109,375.00). 


  

	 	•	 	 Hit $*** newsstand net profit earn 150% of targeted bonus ($131,250.00) 


 All bonuses targets are in relationship of the budget for newsstand net versus the actual newsstand net profit earned by AMI (see Attachment “A”). The following is a description of the term, newsstand net
profit: 
  

	 	•	 	 Newsstand net includes the newsstand profit for each title of the Company. Newsstand profit is the net newsstand revenue less direct newsstand costs. There is a
separate magazine newsstand P&L, which backs up every line on the statement. 


  

	 	•	 	 Newsstand net profit provides you financial incentive to negotiate the best deal possible for wholesaler claims, promotions, discounts, RDA and racking costs. For
example, if we spend more or less on terminal promotions, this impacts newsstand net profit. 


  

	 	•	 	 Newsstand net is charged for AMI’s unsold copies at a standard annual rate. This provides an incentive to minimize unsold copies, while maximizing our sale.



  

	 	•	 	 Newsstand net also includes the overall profit of DSI. 


  

	***	Selected confidential information has been omitted from this Exhibit 10.27 pursuant to a request for confidential treatment filed separately with the Securities and Exchange
Commission. 









	 	•	 	 All components of newsstand net shall be as reflected on the books of American Media in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.



  

	 	•	 	 For FY 2008, our newsstand net is budgeted at $*** for our publications and $*** from DSI for a total of $***. 


  

							
	Best regards,	 		 		 	
				
	 /s/ Daniel Rotstein
	 		 		 	
	Daniel Rotstein	 		 		 	
				
	Accepted and agreed:	 		 		 	
				
	 /s/ Michael Porche
	 		 	 9/5/07
	 	
	Michael Porche	 		 	(date)	 	

  

	***	Confidential information omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

       
<S>                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                         JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                           MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                  10,674,000
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                              144,000
<ALLOWANCES>                               (45,000)
<INVENTORY>                                655,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        11,964,000
<PP&E>                                   2,489,000
<DEPRECIATION>                            (555,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          13,995,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                    4,646,000
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                     8,000
<OTHER-SE>                               9,263,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            13,995,000
<SALES>                                  1,052,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                         1,072,000
<CGS>                                      920,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              920,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         2,247,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         (1,838,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     (1,838,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                            (1,838,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                (0.25)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                (0.25)
        


</TABLE>
Case 2:02-cv-04074-BWK Document 3 Filed 08/27/2002 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:02-cv-04074-BWK Document 3 Filed 08/27/2002 Page 2 of 2
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER OF ABATEMENT

Appellate case name: Jim Kelly, Karl Baldwin, and Wood Master Homes v. Karen 

Tracy 

Appellate case number: 01-18-00913-CV

Trial court case number: 1091620

Trial court: County Civil Court at Law No. 1 of Harris County

Appellee’s counsel, E. F. Mano DeAyala and Andrew C. Wright, have filed a 

motion to withdraw as appellate counsel, explaining that appellee, Karen Tracy, passed 

away pending this appeal and counsel is not authorized to proceed with representation of 

appellee’s estate. Appellants, Jim Kelly, Karl Baldwin, and Wood Master Homes, filed a 

response opposing appellee’s counsel’s withdrawal before a personal representative of 

appellee’s estate is appointed and substituted in this appeal. The parties have indicated that 

appellee’s state is in probate but no personal representative has yet been appointed. Texas 

Rule of Appellate Procedure 6.5 authorizes a court to permit an attorney to withdraw from 

representation of a client on appropriate terms and conditions. TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5. 

Accordingly, the Court denies appellee’s motion to withdraw without prejudice to refiling 

after the terms and conditions set out below are met.

The Court abates this appeal and remands to the trial court to hold a hearing, within 

60 days of the date of this order, to determine whether any heir or personal representative 

can substitute for appellee in this appeal, and whether the heir or representative wishes to 

file a brief. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 151, 152, 154; Casillas v. Cano, 79 S.W.3d 587, 591 (Tex. 

App.—Corpus Christi–Edinburg 2002, no pet.). The trial court may extend the time to hold 

a hearing on any party’s motion.

We order the county clerk to file a supplemental clerk’s record, and the court 

reporter to file a supplemental reporter’s record, if any, within 15 days of the date of the 

hearing. We further order the parties to file a joint status update in 60 days of the date of 

this order and every 30 days thereafter. This appeal is abated, treated as a closed case, and 

removed from the Court’s active docket. The appeal will remain abated until the 
2

supplemental records are filed. Any party may file a motion to reinstate the appeal at any 

time, or the Court may reinstate the appeal on its own motion. Any party may file a motion 

to continue abatement. 

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

 Acting individually Acting for the Court

Date: __December 17, 2019__
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of Total Logistics, Inc. (the Company), hereby
certify, based on our knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                      
|----------------------
|                      
|/s/ William T. Donovan
|William T. Donovan    
|August 12, 2004       



|               
|---------------
|               
|/s/ John Buono 
|John Buono     
|August 12, 2004
Exhibit 32.2

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Husky Energy Inc. (the Company) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2014 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Darren R, Andruko, Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:February 27, 2015



|                              
|------------------------------
|/s/ Darren R. Andruko         
|Darren R. Andruko             
|Acting Chief Financial Officer
Part 1

SUPPLEMENT

USSGL Crosswalk - Reclassified Statement of Changes in Net Position

Fiscal Year 2016 Reporting

Section VI

Bulletin No. 2016-05 Draft VI RSCNP - 1 IRC Handout 4/21/16

Line

No.

USSGL

Acct. USSGL Account Title Begin/End Fed/NonFed Exch/ Nonexch

Budgetary 

Impact 

Indicator

Reporting Type 

Code Recip. Cat. Addl. Info.

5.8

5.8 590000 Other Revenue E N E D/E E/U

5.8 590900 Contra Revenue for other Revenue E N E D/E E/U

7.3 39 38

7.12 44

7.12 532000 Penalties and Fines Revenue E G T E/U

7.12 532400 Contra Revenue for Penalties and Fines E G T E/U

7.16 39 38

8.6

37

8.6 579001 Other Non-Budgetary Financing Sources for Debt 

Accruals/Amortization E G U

8.6 8.7 29

8.6 8.7 573000 Financing Sources Transferred Out Without Reimbursement E Z E/U

8.6 8.7 579000 Other Financing Sources

E G/Z E E/U

8.6 8.7 579100 Adjustment to Financing Sources - Credit Reform E G/Z E E/U

8.6 8.7 599000 Collections for Others - Statement of Custodial Activity E Z T E E/U 7

8.6 8.7 599100 Accrued Collections for Others - Statement of Custodial Activity

E Z T E E/U 7

8.6 8.7 599300 Offset to Non-Entity Collections-Statement of Changes in Net 

Position E Z E E/U

8.6 8.7 599400 Offset to Non-Entity Accrued Collections-Statement of Changes in 

Net Position E Z E E/U

8.8 37

8.8 579010 Other General Fund Financing Sources E F/Z U

Miscellaneous Earned Revenues/2

Appropriations Expended (RC 39 38) / 1

Collections for Others Transferred to the General Fund (RC 44)

General Fund Financed Appropriations - Expended (RC 3938) / 1

Other Non-Budgetary Financing Sources (RC 29) /1, 9

Other non-budgetary financing sources for debt accruals/amortization 

(RC 37) /1

Other financing sources for the General Fund (RC 37) /1
Part 1

SUPPLEMENT

USSGL Crosswalk - Reclassified Statement of Changes in Net Position

Fiscal Year 2016 Reporting

Section VI

Bulletin No. 2016-05 Draft VI RSCNP - 2 IRC Handout 4/21/16

Line

No.

USSGL

Acct. USSGL Account Title Begin/End Fed/NonFed Exch/ Nonexch

Budgetary 

Impact 

Indicator

Reporting Type 

Code Recip. Cat. Addl. Info.

8.7 8.9

44

8.7 8.9 532000 Penalties and Fines Revenue

E F T E/U

8.7 8.9 532400 Contra Revenue for Penalties and Fines E F T E/U

8.7 8.9 571000 Transfer in of Agency Unavailable Custodial and Non-Entity 

Collections E F U

8.8 8.10

48

8.8 8.10 571200 Accrual of Agency Amount To Be Collected - Custodial and NonEntity E F U

8.9 8.11

Transfer in of Agency Unavailable Custodial and Non-Entity Collections 

(RC 44) (for use by Treasury General Fund only)

This line is calculated. Equals sum of lines 4, 5.9, 6.5, 7.18, 8.9 8.11, and 9.

Accrual of Agency's Amounts to be Collected (RC 48) (for use by 

Treasury General Fund only)

Total Other Financing Sources

This line is calculated. Equals sum of lines 8.1 through 8.8 8.10
# C_2017249EN.01002601.xml

| 31.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 249/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 249/26

---

Judgment of the General Court of 7 June 2017 — Mediterranean Premium Spirits v EUIPO — G-Star Raw (GINRAW)

(Case T-258/16) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark GINRAW - Earlier EU word marks RAW - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Evidence submitted for the first time before the General Court - Obligation to state reasons))

(2017/C 249/39)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Mediterranean Premium Spirits, SL (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: J.A. Mora Granell and J. Romaní Lluch, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral and K. Sidat Humphreys, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: G-Star Raw CV (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: L. Dijkman and J. van Manen, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 March 2016 (Case R 1583/2015-4), relating to opposition proceedings between G-Star Raw and Mediterranean Premium Spirits.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mediterranean Premium Spirits, SL to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by EUIPO and G-Star Raw CV. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mediterranean Premium Spirits, SL to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by EUIPO and G-Star Raw CV.

---

(1)  
  OJ C 251, 11.7.2016.

---
Exhibit 23.1

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Board of Directors of Husky Energy Inc.

We consent to the
incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-8 (File No. 333-187135) and Form F-10 (File No. 333-208443) of Husky Energy Inc. of:



| |  | our independent auditors report dated February 23, 2017, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Husky Energy Inc. as at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the consolidated
statements of income (loss), comprehensive income (loss), changes in shareholders equity and cash flows for the years then ended, and notes, comprising a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory information;
|- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | our independent auditors report of registered public accounting firm dated February 23, 2017, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Husky Energy Inc. as at December 31, 2016 and
December 31, 2015, the consolidated statements of income (loss), comprehensive income (loss), changes in shareholders equity and cash flows for the years then ended, and notes, comprising a summary of significant accounting policies and
other explanatory information; and
|- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  | our report of independent registered public accounting firm dated February 23, 2017 on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as at December 31, 2016,
|- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

which reports appear in the annual report on Form 40-F of Husky Energy Inc. for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2016, and further consent to the use of such reports in such annual report on Form 40-F.



|                                  
|----------------------------------
|/s/ KPMG LLP                      
|KPMG LLP                          
|Chartered Professional Accountants
|February 24, 2017                 
|Calgary, Canada
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-6324

DAVID LEE FRANKLIN,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

NORTH CAROLINA ATTORNEY GENERAL; RICK JACKSON;

MIKE EASLEY,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Paul Trevor Sharp, Magistrate

Judge. (CA-98-993-1)

Submitted: June 17, 1999 Decided: June 24, 1999

Before MURNAGHAN and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Lee Franklin, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

David Lee Franklin seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s

order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254

(West 1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on

the reasoning of the magistrate judge. See Franklin v. North Carolina Attorney General, No. CA-98-993-1 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 23, 1999).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court

and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1584 

To amend the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 to reauthorize the Judicial 

Conference of the United States to redact sensitive information contained 

in financial disclosure reports of judicial officers and employees, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 19, 2017 

Mr. JOHNSON (for himself and Mrs. MCCASKILL) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 to reauthorize the Judicial Conference of the United States to 

redact sensitive information contained in financial disclosure reports of judicial officers and employees, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REDACTION AUTHORITY CONCERNING SEN4 SITIVE SECURITY INFORMATION. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 105(b)(3) of the Ethics 

6 in Government Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) is amended 

7 by striking subparagraph (E). 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1584 IS

1 (b) TECHNICAL AMENDMENTS.—Section 105(b)(1) 

2 of the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) 

3 is amended— 

4 (1) in the first sentence, by striking the second 

5 comma after ‘‘as the case may be’’; and 

6 (2) in the third sentence, by inserting a comma 

7 after ‘‘as the case may be’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

AGSOUTH GENETICS LLC AND UNIVERSITY OF 

GEORGIA RESEARCH FOUNDATION, INC.,

Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

GEORGIA FARM SERVICES LLC,

Defendant-Appellant,

AND

E AND I DIVERSIFIED FARM SERVICE INC, 

TERRELL PEANUT COMPANY, AND EDWARD 

PARKER, Individually,

Defendants, 

AND

JIM USRY,

Respondent.

______________________ 

2014-1571

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Middle District of Georgia in No. 1:09-cv-00186-WLS, 

Judge W. Louis Sands.

______________________ 
2 AGSOUTH GENETICS LLC v. GEORGIA FARM SERVICES LLC

ON MOTION

______________________ 

O R D E R

Upon consideration of Georgia Farm Services, LLC’s 

unopposed motion to withdraw its appeal, 

 IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

(1) The motion is granted. The appeal is dismissed.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

 FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

Daniel E. O’Toole 

Clerk of Court

s25

ISSUED AS A MANDATE: 11-14-14