alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1
 
 **CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**
 **SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**
 **(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)**
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of Family Room Entertainment Corporation, a New Mexico corporation (the Company), on Form 10-KSB for the year ending June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, George Furla, Chief Executive Officer of the Company do each hereby certify, pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350), that to the best of my knowledge and belief:
 
 (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. 
 /s/    George FurlaGeorge Furla
Chief Executive Officer
October 13, 2004
No. 57965.

protest 205439-K (New York).

#### D. C. Andrews & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issues are similar to those involved in Abstract 57104, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
EX-10.10





 Exhibit 10.10 

Apache Corporation 401(k) Savings Plan 

Amendment to Definition of Change of Control 

Apache Corporation (“Apache”) sponsors the Apache Corporation 401(k) Savings Plan (the “Plan”). In section 10.4 of the Plan, Apache
reserved the right to amend the Plan from time to time. Apache hereby exercises that right as follows, effective March 1, 2021: 
  

	1.	 Subsection 5.1(c) is hereby deleted and superseded in its entirety by the following: 



 

	 	(c)	 Change of Control. The Company Contributions Accounts of all Participants shall be fully vested as of
the “Effective Date” of a “Change of Control,” as such terms are defined in APA Corporation’s Income Continuance Plan or any successor to such plan. 



[Signature Page Follows] 

  
 Page 1 of 1 













 EXECUTED this 1st day of March, 2021. 

 

			
	APACHE CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	 /s/ Brandy Jones

		 	Brandy Jones
		 	Vice President, Human Resources



  
 Signature Page to Apache
Corporation 401(k) Savings Plan 
 Amendment to Definition of Change of Control
Before the First Division,

May 17, 1962

No. 66764.

#### Polk’s Model Craft Hobbies, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 311717-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C..T.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of HO equipment similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. *Polk’s Model Craft Hobbies, Inc., et al.*(47 C.C.P.A. 137, C.A.D. 746), the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: The items marked “A” at the appropriate rate of duty, depending upon the date of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, under the provision in paragraph 397, as modified, for manufactures in chief value of base metal, not specially provided for, and the items marked “B” at 13% percent ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 353, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 52739), for other metal articles having as an essential feature an electrical element or device. Other items, marked “A and B,” were held dutiable according to the separate components as follows: The “A” portion at the appropriate rate of duty, depending upon the date of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, under the provision in paragraph 397, as modified, for manufactures in chief value of base metal, not specially provided for, at a value of $2 per unit, and the “B” portion at 13% percent ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 353, as modified by T.D. 52739, for other metal articles having as an essential feature an electrical element or device, on the basis of the appraised *per se*unit value, less $2, as claimed.
**CERTIFICATION      OF**

**CHIEF      EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND**

**CHIEF      FINANCIAL OFFICER**

**PURSUANT      TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

| 1.     | Such                Yearly Report of Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31,2006,                fully                complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities                Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                                             |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |
| 2.     | The                information contained in such Yearly Report on Form 10-KSB for the                year                ended December 31, 2006, fairly represents in all material respects,                the                financial condition and results of operations of Genesis Realty Group,                Inc. |

| Date:                April 2, 2007                                                                                                                                          |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                                                                                        |
| **GENESIS                REALTY GROUP, INC.**                                                                                                                               |
|                                                                                                                                                                        |
| By:                /s/                Jeffrey Glick                     |
| Jeffrey                GlickChief                Executive Officer, Chief Financial                Officer                                                                  |
IPAC Operational Metrics for July 2016

‘Volume by Transaction Type
Dollar Amount ‘36 of Total Dollar Amount] Number of Transactions] _ W of Total Number of Transactions
[Fiduciary (investment & Borrowing] 14,999,489,276,266| 99.56% 2.956 7.57%
leuv/sel 59,676,691,394 0.399 307,874 34.20%
Benefits (RITS) 7,583,964,460| 0.05%} 432| 0.37%)
|Check Aftermath (TRACS) 116,984,202) 0.00%] 1,021) 0.86%)
Eero Dollar o 0.00% 1 0.00%|
|Grand Total 15,065,866,916 321 100.00%| 118,284) 100.00%|
|Grand Total 17,573,585,546,834| 100.00%| 111,916) 100.00%|
[rune to July Change “2,507, 718,630,512 [360]
[percer =14.270% [ s.69084]
——
[Grand Total -July 2015, 7,352,963,949,096| [413,230]
[July 2025 to uly 2016 change 7,712,902,967,226| ee)
[Percentage Change 104.9% ee
No. 63595.

protests 149371-K, etc. (New York).

#### W. J. Bush & *Co.,*Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that involved in *Dalton Cooper, Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(41 Cust. Ct. 271, C.D. 2051), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

' Donlon J., dissented for the reasons set forth in her dissenting opinion in C.D. 2051, *supra.*
MEMORANDUM

TO: File

FROM: David R. Hill

RE: Meeting Concerning Potential Test Procedures and Energy Conservation 

Standards for Set-Top Boxes and Network Equipment 

DATE: March 14, 2012

In compliance with the Department of Energy’s guidance on ex parte communications (74 Fed. 

Reg. 52795 (Oct. 14, 2009)), this memorandum provides a summary of a March 7, 2012, 

meeting with DOE officials concerning potential test procedures and energy conservation 

standards for set-top boxes and network equipment.

Meeting attendees:

John Cymbalski (DOE – EE)

Jeremy Dommu (DOE – EE)

Ashley Armstrong (DOE – EE)

Dan Cohen (DOE – GC)

Celia Sher (DOE – GC)

Cecilia Martaus (AT&T)

Mike Pfau (AT&T)

Jeff Dygert (AT&T)

David Hill (Sidley Austin)

The AT&T representatives discussed a number of concerns with DOE’s potential promulgation 

of test procedures and mandatory energy efficiency standards for set-top boxes and network 

equipment. DOE has issued a Request for Information (RFI) in which it has requested comments 

with respect to the development of test procedures and efficiency standards for these products. 

(76 Fed. Reg. 78174 (Dec. 16, 2011)). AT&T said it would be submitting comments to DOE in 

response to the RFI by the March 15, 2012 deadline.

The AT&T representatives made the following points during the March 7 meeting:

AT&T’s U-verse® receivers should not be covered by any mandatory test procedures or 

energy conservation standards that DOE might promulgate pursuant to DOE’s Energy 
2

Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA) authority, for the reasons discussed during the 

meeting and summarized below.

AT&T’s U-verse® receivers already are very energy efficient, and among the most 

energy efficient of the major video service providers. The AT&T representatives 

explained how intelligence in the network allows AT&T to stream only the desired 

programming to a customer, which is a key reason the U-verse® receiver in a customer’s 

home can be so energy efficient.

Significant energy efficiency improvements for the AT&T U-verse® receivers has been 

achieved rapidly, and in a manner consistent with technological innovation, through 

voluntary industry efforts and the voluntary Energy Star program – and without the need 

for or the imposition of mandatory energy efficiency standards.

Mandatory standards are undesirable not only because they are not needed in order to 

bring about rapid and significant energy efficiency improvements, but also because 

mandatory energy conservation standards have the potential to stifle innovation, limit 

customer choice, and impose product designs and functionality limitations that customers 

do not want.

There is no legal authority to establish energy conservation standards for AT&T’s Uverse® receivers because, considered as a separate class, they use an amount of energy 

that is below the statutory threshold that must be met before DOE has the authority under 

EPCA to impose mandatory energy conservation standards.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Susanne H. Linn and Mellisa Knesz :

Plaintiffs :

: Civil Action

 v. :

: No. 02-4417

Northampton County, Northampton :

County Department of Corrections, :

Todd Buskirk, Warden, and AFSCME :

Local 2549, :

Defendants : _____________________________________________________________________

DEFENDANTS’ JOINT MOTION IN LIMINE TO EXCLUDE ANY AND ALL

EVIDENCE PRIOR TO AUGUST 16, 1996 REGARDING DEFENDANTS’ ALLEGED

DISCRIMINATORY CONDUCT, PRACTICES AND POLICIES

Defendants Northampton County, Northampton County Department of

Corrections, Warden Todd Buskirk and AFSCME, Local 2549 move to exclude any and

all evidence prior to August 16, 1996 regarding Defendants’ alleged discriminatory

conduct, practices and policies. The grounds for this Motion and supporting law are set

forth in the accompanying Memorandum of Law, which is incorporated herein by

reference.

Respectfully submitted,

WILLIG, WILLIAMS & DAVIDSON MONTGOMERY, McCRACKEN,

WALKER & RHOADS, LLP

____________________________ ______________________________

LINDA M. MARTIN, ESQUIRE DAVID J. MacMAIN, ESQUIRE

JOHN R. BIELSKI, ESQUIRE L. KRISTEN BLANCHARD, ESQUIRE

1845 Walnut Street, 24th Floor DENNIS G. YOUNG, JR., ESQUIRE

Philadelphia, PA 19103 123 South Broad Street

(Office) (215) 656-3600 Avenue of the Arts

(Facsimile) (215) 561-5135 Philadelphia, PA 19109 (Office) (215) 772-1500

(Facsimile) (215) 772-7620

Counsel for AFSCME, Local 2549 Counsel for Northampton County, Northampton County Department of 

Corrections and Warden Todd Buskirk

Dated: July 15, 2003

Case 2:02-cv-04417-AB Document 29 Filed 07/15/2003 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
                    The Schedule contains summary financial 
                    information extracted from the financial
                    statements for World Monitor Trust--Series B
                    and is qualified in its entirety by reference
                    to such financial statements
</LEGEND>

<RESTATED>          
<CIK>               1051823
<NAME>              World Monitor Trust--Series B
<MULTIPLIER>        1

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1998

<PERIOD-START>                  Jun-10-1998

<PERIOD-END>                    Sep-25-1998

<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-Mos

<CASH>                          8,286,562

<SECURITIES>                    394,047

<RECEIVABLES>                   34,857

<ALLOWANCES>                    0

<INVENTORY>                     0

<CURRENT-ASSETS>                8,715,466

<PP&E>                          0

<DEPRECIATION>                  0

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  8,715,466

<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           199,881

<BONDS>                         0

<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0

<PREFERRED>                     0

<COMMON>                        0

<OTHER-SE>                      8,515,585

<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    8,715,466

<SALES>                         0

<TOTAL-REVENUES>                1,031,140

<CGS>                           0

<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0

<OTHER-EXPENSES>                350,243

<LOSS-PROVISION>                0

<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0

<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0

<INCOME-TAX>                    0

<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0

<DISCONTINUED>                  0

<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0

<CHANGES>                       0

<NET-INCOME>                    680,897

<EPS-PRIMARY>                   9.46

<EPS-DILUTED>                   0

</TABLE>
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 1SUPPLEMENT	&"Arial,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2022 ReportingSection VII

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2022-16	&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000DRAFT&K000000 VII VDR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout 8/17/22
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EASTERN DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ANDRE TAYLOR,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 69 EAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

ANDRE TAYLOR,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 70 EAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 10th day of August, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
Exhibit
      32.1





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Report”) of I.D. Systems,
      Inc. (the “Corporation”) for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Jeffrey M. Jagid,
      Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§
1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my
      knowledge, that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Corporation.




Dated: March 14, 2008
            /s/
                Jeffrey M. JagidName:
                Jeffrey M. JagidTitle:
                Chief Executive Officer





The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter
      63
      of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report
      or
      as a separate disclosure document.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to the Corporation and will be retained by
      the
      Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
      staff
      upon request.
# C_2018042EN.01001801.xml

| 5.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 42/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 42/18

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 December 2017 — Campo and Others v EEAS

(Case T-577/16) (1)

1

((Civil Service - Officials - Agents - Remuneration - EEAS staff posted to a third country - Article 10 of Annex X to the Staff Regulations - Annual assessment of the allowance for living conditions - Decision reducing the allowance for living conditions in Montenegro from 15 % to 10 % - Plea of illegality))

(2018/C 042/25)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Alessandro Campo (Podgorica, Montenegro) and the 12 other applicants whose names are set out in the annex to the judgment (represented by: N. de Montigny and J.-N. Louis, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European External Action Service (EEAS) (represented by: S. Marquardt, Agent, and M. Troncoso Ferrer, F.-M. Hislaire and S. Moya Izquierdo, lawyers)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU for annulment of the applicants’ salary slips in respect of March 2015 and of those drawn up afterwards in so far as those salary slips apply the decision of the EEAS of 23 February 2015 reducing, with effect from 1 January 2015, the allowance for living conditions paid to EU staff posted to Montenegro.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the salary slips for March 2015 of Mr Alessandro Campo and of the other officials and agents of the European External Action Service (EEAS), whose names are set out in the annex drawn up by the EEAS on the date on which the action was brought, in so far as those slips apply the decision of the EEAS of 23 February 2015 reducing, with effect from 1 January 2015, the allowance for living conditions paid to EU staff posted to Montenegro; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the salary slips for March 2015 of Mr Alessandro Campo and of the other officials and agents of the European External Action Service (EEAS), whose names are set out in the annex drawn up by the EEAS on the date on which the action was brought, in so far as those slips apply the decision of the EEAS of 23 February 2015 reducing, with effect from 1 January 2015, the allowance for living conditions paid to EU staff posted to Montenegro;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders the EEAS to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the EEAS to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 145, 25.4.2016 (case initially registered before the European Union Civil Service Tribunal as Case F-6/16, transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1.9.2016).

1

---
No. 52937.

#### British American Importation Co., Ltd. *v.*United States,

protest 138616-K (C)/12839 (New Orleans).

*262Opinion by

Johnson, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained. The protest was overruled in all other respects.
VOL I Appendix 3 2-4700 

DRAFT 1 IRC Handout April 23, 2019

Category 29–Non-Reciprocating USSGL Accounts for Federal Activity

221300Z3 Employer Contributions and Payroll Taxes Payable

222500Z3 Unfunded FECA Liability

229000Z3 Other Unfunded Employment Related Liability

240000Z Liability for Non-Fiduciary Deposit Funds and Undeposited Collections

241000Z Liability for Clearing Accounts

299000Z Other Liabilities Without Related Budgetary Obligations

310500Z Unexpended Appropriations–Prior-Period Adjustments Due to Corrections of Errors–Years Preceding the Prior-Year

310800Z Unexpended Appropriations–Prior-Period Adjustments Due to Corrections of Errors

310900Z Unexpended Appropriations–Prior-Period Adjustments Due to Changes in Accounting Principles

570500Z Expended Appropriations–Prior-Period Adjustments Due to Corrections of Errors–Years Preceding the Prior-Year

570800Z Expended Appropriations–Prior-Period Adjustments Due to Corrections of Errors

570900Z Expended Appropriations–Prior-Period Adjustments Due to Changes in Accounting Principles

573000Z Financing Sources Transferred Out Without Reimbursement

579000Z Other Financing Sources

579010Z Other General Fund Financing Sources

590000Z E/T Other Revenue 

590900Z E/T Contra Revenue for Other Revenue 

640000Z3 Benefit Expense

680000Z Future Funded Expenses

690000Z Non-Production Costs

740000Z Prior-Period Adjustments Due to Corrections of Errors

740100Z Prior-Period Adjustments Due to Changes in Accounting Principles

740500Z Prior-Period Adjustments Due to Corrections of Errors–Years Preceding the Prior-Year

750000Z X/T Distribution of Income–Dividend
VOL I Appendix 3 2-4700

DRAFT 2 IRC Handout April 23, 2019

___le 6: Eliminations Summary for General Fund Transactions

Category Name/

Sub-Category Name

Reciprocal Category 

Pairing of Eliminating Accounts for General Fund Transactions

Entity 1–Reporting Entity Entity 2–General Fund

USSGL Account USSGL Account Title

USSGL 

Account USSGL Account Title

General Fund 

Transactions/

GF Authority

31

Prior Period Adjustment 

– Appropriations 

Unexpended/ 

Outstanding

310500G(099)

310800G(099)

310900G(099)

Unexpended 

Appropriations - PriorPeriod Adjustments Due 

to Corrections of Errors -

Years Preceding the 

Prior-Year

Unexpended 

Appropriations - PriorPeriod Adjustments Due 

to Corrections of Errors

Unexpended 

Appropriations - PriorPeriod Adjustments Due 

to Changes in Accounting 

Principles

320800F(XXX) Appropriations 

Outstanding - PriorPeriod Adjustments

32

Prior Period Adjustment 

– Appropriations 

Expended

570500G(099)

570800G(099)

570900G(099)

Expended Appropriations 

- Prior-Period 

Adjustments Due to 

Corrections of Errors -

Years Preceding the 

Prior-Year

Expended Appropriations 

- Prior-Period 

Adjustments Due to 

Corrections of Errors

Expended Appropriations 

- Prior-Period 

Adjustments Due to 

Changes in Accounting 

Principles

570810F(XXX) Appropriations -

Expended - Prior-Period 

Adjustments
No. 51334.

#### Protests 110942-K, etc., of Reciprocal Trade Corp. (New York).

*190Opinion by

Kincheloé, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise assessed for duty at the rates of 18.80, 19.50, and 18.10 percent under paragraph 904 consist of cotton cloth the same in all material respects as that the subject of *Daniels*v. *United States*(16 Cust. Ct. 83, C. D. 989). In accordance therewith the protests were sustained as claimed.