alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ANNA MAE JOHNSON, :

Plaintiff, : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. :

:

UNUM LIFE INSURANCE :

COMPANY OF AMERICA, et al., : No. 02-4368

Defendants. :

ORDER

AND NOW, this day of November, 2002, following a phone conference on November

20, 2002 with counsel for the parties, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. All fact discovery in this case shall be completed by January 6, 2003.

2. This Court’s Order of October 30, 2002 (Document No. 12) is amended as follows:

a. Paragraph 1 shall now read: “Any motion for summary judgment by

Defendants shall be filed by January 13, 2003.” 

b. Paragraph 2 shall now read: “Any response thereto by Plaintiff shall be filed

by January 27, 2003.” 

BY THE COURT:

 

Berle M. Schiller, J.

Case 2:02-cv-04368-BMS Document 14 Filed 11/20/2002 Page 1 of 2
2

Case 2:02-cv-04368-BMS Document 14 Filed 11/20/2002 Page 2 of 2
# C_2018152EN.01002902.xml

| 30.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 152/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 152/29

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 March 2018 — Gifi Diffusion v EUIPO — Crocs (Footwear)

(Case T-424/16) (1)

1

((Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing footwear - Earlier Community design - Grounds for invalidity - Duty to state reasons - Article 62 of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Ground raised by the Board of Appeal of its own motion - Powers of the Board of Appeal - Article 63(1) of Regulation No 6/2002))

(2018/C 152/35)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Gifi Diffusion (Villeneuve-sur-Lot, France) (represented by: C. de Chassey, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Crocs, Inc. (Niwot, Colorado, United States) (represented by: H. Seymour, L. Cassidy, J. Guise and D. Knight, Solicitors, N. Hadjadj Cazier, M. Berger and H. Haouideg, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 April 2016 (Case R 37/2015-3), relating to invalidity proceedings between Gifi Diffusion and Crocs.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 25 April 2016 (Case R 37/2015-3) concerning invalidity proceedings between Gifi Diffusion and Crocs, Inc.; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 25 April 2016 (Case R 37/2015-3) concerning invalidity proceedings between Gifi Diffusion and Crocs, Inc.;

| 2. | Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Gifi Diffusion in the proceedings before the General Court; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and pay those incurred by Gifi Diffusion in the proceedings before the General Court;

| 3. | Orders Crocs to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Crocs to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 392, 24.10.2016.

1

---
(Reap. Dec. 10682)

Entry No. 4899-H, etc.

#### The Heyman Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States

(Decided February 18, 1964)

*Bharretts, Palay & Garter*for the plaintiffs.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Rao, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, annexed to this decision and made a part hereof, were submitted for decision upon the following stipulation :

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties hereto that the merchandise and the issues in the appeals for reappraisement listed on Schedule A attached hereto and made a part hereof are the same in all material respects as the merchandise and the issues in *United States*v. *The Seyman Company, Inc.,*50 Oust. Ct. 564, ARD 157.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that said merchandise was exported prior to March 1, 1956 and that the price, at the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of Mexico, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to *453placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States was $0,075 per pound net packed.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the record in ARD 157 be incorporated with the record in these cases and that these appeals for reappraisement be submitted on this stipulation and are limited to the merchandise described herein.

Upoi; tHe agreed facts and the cited authority, I find export value, as that value is defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise covered by said appeals for reappraisement and that such value is $0,075 per pound, net, packed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
No. 51627.

#### Protest 54807-K of City of Paris Dry Goods Co. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*,(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on the entry. The protest was sustained to this extent.
Petitioner mailed one set of Objections addressed to the Clerk of Court with 1

instructions to file, and mailed a second set addressed to me with correspondence informing that

the set was a courtesy copy. The Clerk’s Office inadvertently filed both sets.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ANDRE KINARD, : CIVIL ACTION

Petitioner :

:

v. : NO. 05-2804

:

JOHN PALAKOVICH, et al., :

Respondents :

O R D E R

STENGEL, J.

AND NOW, this 16th day of November, 2006, upon careful and independent

consideration of the petition for writ of habeas corpus, and after review of the Report and

Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Timothy R. Rice, and both sets of

Petitioner’s identical Objections thereto (Documents #25 and #26) , IT IS ORDERED that: 1

1. Petitioner’s Objections are OVERRULED.

2. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.

3. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED with prejudice. 

4. There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability.

5. The Clerk of the Court shall mark this case closed for all purposes.

BY THE COURT:

 /s/ Lawrence F. Stengel 

LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J.

Case 2:05-cv-02804-LS Document 27 Filed 11/16/06 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 23.1




CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the  incorporation  by reference in  Registration  Statement  Nos.
333-65974,   333-41454,  33-50922,  33-61532,  33-66482,  33-80726,  333-105910,
333-105886  and  333-33485  on Form S-8,  of our report  dated  April 22,  2005,
relating to management's  report on the  effectiveness  of internal control over
financial  reporting,  appearing in this Amendment to Annual Report on Form 10-K
of Saucony, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2004.


/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
April 22, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                      93,992,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               36,251,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           149,375,000
<PP&E>                                     201,556,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               4,824,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             858,426,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          260,165
<BONDS>                                    350,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       146,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 (5,192,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               858,426,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            60,994,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               58,175,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             5,742,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           6,748,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (8,411,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   500,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (8,911,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (8,911,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
Part 2 DRAFT Fiscal Year 2023 Reporting 

SUPPLEMENT Section VII 

U.S. Standard General Ledger 

Closing Edits Detail Report 

Bulletin No. 2022-16 DRAFT VII CER - 4 IRC Handout 8/17/22

Closing Rule Number: 21.420100 

Closing USSGL Account: 420100 Total Actual Resources - Collected 

Calculated Preclosing Balance 420100 Beginning Balance 

USSGL Account 

Number Begin/End Indicator Authority Type Code 

USSGL Account 

Number Begin/End Indicator 

411100 E D/P 420100 B 

411200 E 

411300 E D/P 

411400 E D/P 

411500 E D/P 

411600 E P 

411601 E P 

411700 E D/P 

411800 E 

411900 E D/E/F/P 

411910 E D/E/F/P 

411912 E P 

412250 E X 

412500 E 

412800 E B/P 

412900 E B/P 

413000 E 

413800 E 

413810 E 

414200 E 

414201 E 

414202 E 

414203 E 

414600 E B/P/S 

414700 E 

414800 E 

415000 E 

415100 E P/S 

415200 E 

415900 E B/P 

415901 E B/P 

416700 E P/S 

416712 E P 

417000 E D/P/S 

417300 E P/S 

417400 E X 

417500 E P/S 

417600 E P/S 

419000 E P/S 

419100 E P/S 

419200 E P/S 

419300 E P/S 

419500 E 
Part 2 DRAFT Fiscal Year 2023 Reporting 

SUPPLEMENT Section VII 

U.S. Standard General Ledger 

Closing Edits Detail Report 

Bulletin No. 2022-16 DRAFT VII CER - 8 IRC Handout 8/17/22

Closing Rule Number: 21.436000 

Closing USSGL Account: 436000 Appropriation Purpose Fulfilled - Balance Not Available 

Calculated Preclosing Balance 436000 Beginning Balance 

USSGL Account 

Number Begin/End Indicator 

USSGL Account 

Number Begin/End Indicator 

436000 E 436000 B 

436001 E 

 

Closing Rule Number: 21.438400 

Closing USSGL Account: 438400 Temporary Reduction/Cancellation Returned by Appropriation 

Calculated Preclosing Balance 438400 Beginning Balance 

USSGL Account 

Number Begin/End Indicator 

USSGL Account 

Number Begin/End Indicator 

412100 E 438400 B 

412300 E 

412400 E 

416800 E 

435700 E 

438200 E 

438300 E 

438400 E 

438500 E 

 

Closing Rule Number: 21.439400 

Closing USSGL Account: 439400 Receipts Unavailable for Obligation Upon Collection 

Calculated Preclosing Balance 439400 Beginning Balance 

USSGL Account 

Number Begin/End Indicator 

USSGL Account 

Number Begin/End Indicator 

439400 E 439400 B 

439412 E 

439600 E 

 

Closing Rule Number: 21.439401 

Closing USSGL Account: 439401 Daily Inflation/Deflation Compensation Adjustment - Unavailable 

Calculated Preclosing Balance 439401 Beginning Balance 

USSGL Account 

Number Begin/End Indicator 

USSGL Account 

Number Begin/End Indicator 

439401 E 439401 B 

439402 E 

 

Closing Rule Number: 21.439402 

Closing USSGL Account: 439402 Daily Inflation/Deflation Compensation Adjustment - Previously Unavailable 

Calculated Preclosing Balance 439402 Beginning Balance 

USSGL Account 

Number Begin/End Indicator 

USSGL Account 

Number Begin/End Indicator 

439402 E 439402 B
# C_2017063EN.01001501.xml

| 27.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/15

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione (Italy) lodged on 23 November 2016 — Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa (Consob) v Antonio Zecca

(Case C-597/16)

(2017/C 063/21)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Corte suprema di cassazione

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa (Consob)

Appellant:

Respondent: Antonio Zecca

Respondent:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Is Article 50 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union to be interpreted as meaning that, where a court has delivered a final judgment finding a defendant not to have committed the criminal offence alleged, it precludes the initiation or prosecution of further proceedings based on the same facts with a view to the imposition of penalties which, on account of their nature and severity, may be regarded as criminal penalties, without it being necessary for the national court to make any further assessment? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is Article 50 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union to be interpreted as meaning that, where a court has delivered a final judgment finding a defendant not to have committed the criminal offence alleged, it precludes the initiation or prosecution of further proceedings based on the same facts with a view to the imposition of penalties which, on account of their nature and severity, may be regarded as criminal penalties, without it being necessary for the national court to make any further assessment?

| 2. | In assessing the effectiveness, proportionality and dissuasiveness of penalties, in the context of determining whether there has been a breach of the ne bis in idem principle referred to in Article 50 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, must a national court take into account the thresholds for sanctions laid down in Directive 2014/57/EU? (1) |
| --- | --- |

2.

In assessing the effectiveness, proportionality and dissuasiveness of penalties, in the context of determining whether there has been a breach of the ne bis in idem principle referred to in Article 50 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, must a national court take into account the thresholds for sanctions laid down in Directive 2014/57/EU? (1)

ne bis in idem

1

---

(1)  Directive 2014/57/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 on criminal sanctions for market abuse (market abuse directive) (OJ 2014 L 173, p. 179).

1

---
**EXHIBIT
      23.2**











**Consent
      of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**





We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Form
      S-8 No. 333-117837 and Form S-8 No. 333-59886) pertaining to the 2004 Stock
      Incentive Plan and 2001 Employee Stock Incentive Plan of Marine Products
      Corporation of our report dated February 27, 2004 (except for the matter
      discussed in the last paragraph of Note 1 as to which the date is March 11,
      2005), with respect to the consolidated financial statements and schedule of
      Marine Products Corporation included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the
      year ended December 31, 2005.







/s/
      Ernst
& Young LLP








Atlanta,
      Georgia


March
      6,
      2006
Part 1 DRAFT

198

USSGL Account 

Number Begin/End Zero

488100 E 0

Edit Rule Number:

Fiscal Year 2023 Reporting

Section VII

U.S. Standard General Ledger

Data Edits - Detail Report

SUPPLEMENT

Left Side Attribute Combination Right Side Attribute Combination

USSGL 488100 Balance Check

USSGL account 488100 ending must have a credit balance at a TAS level

SZ: USSGL / Zero

Less Than Or Equal (<=)

12

01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 11

Rule Name:

Description:

Type:

Operand:

Fatal Period:

Proposed Analytical Period:

Bulletin No. 2023-08 DRAFT VII EDR - 1 IRC Handout 4/20/23
Part 1 DRAFT

199

USSGL Account 

Number Begin/End Zero

498100 E 0

Edit Rule Number:

Fiscal Year 2023 Reporting

Section VII

U.S. Standard General Ledger

Data Edits - Detail Report

SUPPLEMENT

Left Side Attribute Combination Right Side Attribute Combination

USSGL 498100 Balance Check

USSGL account 498100 ending must have a credit balance at a TAS level

SZ: USSGL / Zero

Less Than Or Equal (<=)

12

01, 02, 03, 04, 05, 06, 07, 08, 09, 10, 11

Rule Name:

Description:

Type:

Operand:

Fatal Period:

Proposed Analytical Period:

Bulletin No. 2023-08 DRAFT VII EDR - 2 IRC Handout 4/20/23
Part 1 DRAFT

200

USSGL 

Account 

Number Begin/End

USSGL 

Account 

Number Begin/End

403400 E 449000 E

404400 E 459000 E

404700 E 469000 E

404800 E

405000 E

406000 E

407000 E

408000 E

412000 E

412050 E

416000 E

416500 E

416512 E

418000 E

418300 E

421000 E

421100 E

421500 E

421512 E

431000 E

438600 E

438900 E

439432 E

439502 E

439702 E

439703 E

439801 E

Edit Rule Number:

Fiscal Year 2023 Reporting

Section VII

U.S. Standard General Ledger

Data Edits - Detail Report

SUPPLEMENT

Left Side Attribute Combination Right Side Attribute Combination

Anticipated Budgetary Resources Equals Anticipated Status of Budgetary Resources

For ending balances, the sum of the anticipated budgetary resources equals the sum of the anticipated status of budgetary 

SS: USSGL / USSGL

Equal (=)

01,02,03,04,05,06,07,08,09,10,11,12

Rule Name:

Description:

Type:

Operand:

Fatal Period:

Proposed Analytical 

Period:

Bulletin No. 2023-08 DRAFT VII EDR - 3 IRC Handout 4/20/23
##### 



EXHIBIT 99(b)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northland Cable Television,
Inc. and Subsidiary (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Gary Jones, President of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;



| | (1) |  | The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 (a) or (15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m or 78(d)); and   
| | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Date: 5-15-03

|                                                                                          |  | 
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/   GARY S. JONES

Gary S. Jones
President
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement will be retained by Northland
Cable Television, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 63035.

#### The Bamboo Window et al. *v.*United States,

protests 297709-K, etc. (Honolulu).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of Shoji panels similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United Enterprises et al.*v. *United States*(41 Cust. Ct. 73, C.D. 2023), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
appeal were premature. Because appellant failed to designate an 

appealable order, we 

ORDER these appeals DISMISSED. 

Piting 

Parraguirre 

rat 

Saitta 

J. 

cc: Hon. Brent T. Adams, District Judge 

Jamie A. Rosaschi 

Attorney General/Carson City 

Washoe County District Attorney 

Washoe District Court Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 2 

(Oj 1947A
Part 1

SUPPLEMENT

DRAFT 

No Name Description Rule Attribute Combination

27E

Credit Cohort Year and Financing Account Code Validation

If Financing Account Code for the TAS is D (Direct) or G (Guaranteed) on the SMAF and the USSGL account is budgetary, then the Credit Cohort Year is required. Otherwise, Credit Cohort Year should be null.

CREDIT COHORT 

YEAR

CONCATENATED 

TAS

FINANCING 

ACCOUNT CODE

Pass (BLANK) 086 X4240000 DPass (BLANK) 086 X4240000 GPass 1001 071 X4074000 DPass 1001 071 X4074000 GPass 1001 071 X4075000 DPass 1001 071 X4075000 GPass 2020 012 X4158000 DPass 2020 012 X4158000 GPass 2020 086 X4587000 DPass 2020 086 X4587000 G

29E

Program Report Category Code and Apportionment Category Code Validation

If the Apportionment Category Code is E, then Program Report Category Code (number) must be null.

USSGL ACCOUNT 

NUMBER

APPORTIONMENT 

CATEGORY CODE

PROGRAM REPORT 

CATEGORY 

NUMBER

Fail 406000 B ##

Fail 406000 A ##Pass 406000 A (BLANK)Pass 406000 B (BLANK)Fail 407000 A ##Fail 407000 B ##Pass 407000 A (BLANK)Pass 407000 B (BLANK)Fail 421000 A ##Fail 421000 B ##Pass 421000 A (BLANK)Pass 421000 B (BLANK)Fail 421500 A ##Fail 421500 B ##Pass 421500 A (BLANK)Pass 421500 B (BLANK)Fail 431000 A ##Fail 431000 B ##Pass 431000 A (BLANK)Pass 431000 B (BLANK)Fail 463000 A ##Fail 463000 B ##Pass 463000 A (BLANK)Pass 463000 B (BLANK)Fail 465000 A ##Fail 465000 B ##Pass 465000 A (BLANK)Pass 465000 B (BLANK)

Data Validations - Detail

U.S. Standard General Ledger

Bulletin No. 2019-10 DRAFT VII VDR - 1 
Part 1

SUPPLEMENT

DRAFT 

No Name Description Rule Attribute Combination

Data Validations - Detail

U.S. Standard General Ledger

30E

Apportionment Category B and Apportionment Category B Program Code (Number) Validation

If Apportionment Category Code is B, then Apportionment Category B Program Code (number) is required. The values must be between 6011-6159.

USSGL ACCOUNT 

NUMBER

APPORTIONMENT 

CATEGORY CODE

APPORTIONMENT 

CATEGORY B 

PROGRAM

Fail 406000 B ####

Pass 406000 B (BLANK)Fail 407000 B ####Pass 407000 B (BLANK)Fail 421000 B ####Pass 421000 B (BLANK)Fail 421500 B ####Pass 421500 B (BLANK)Fail 431000 B ####Pass 431000 B (BLANK)Fail 463000 B ####Pass 463000 B (BLANK)Fail 465000 B ####Pass 465000 B (BLANK)

90E

Disaster Emergency Fund Code Domain Value Restrictions

The use of DEF Code domain values other than "Q" is limited to specific fund families.

DISASTER 

EMERGENCY FUND 

CODE Fund Family

Pass A 0360110Pass A 0700702Pass A 0700719Pass C 0970100Pass C 0970130Pass C 0974930Pass D 0860162

Bulletin No. 2019-10 DRAFT VII VDR - 2