alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
32(a)








This
Certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise
subject to the liability of that section.  This Certification shall
not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other
document pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, except as otherwise stated in
such filing.








Certification
Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63


of Title
18 of the United States Code








In
connection with the Annual Report of Indiana Michigan Power Company (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K (the “Report”) for the year ended December 31, 2008 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Michael
G. Morris, the chief executive officer of the Company certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 that, based on my knowledge (i) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.








/s/ Michael G.
Morris_______________


Michael
G. Morris


Chief
Executive Officer








February
27, 2009








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
American Electric Power Company, Inc. and will be retained by American Electric
Power Company, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
**CERTIFICATE**
     I, Stuart F. Feiner, Executive Vice-President, General Counsel and Secretary of Inco Limited(the “Company”), do hereby certify that the following resolution was duly passed at a meeting ofthe Board of Directors of the Company duly called and held on March 14, 2005 and that the saidresolution is presently in full force and effect, unamended:
      “RESOLVED, that the filing with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission(“SEC”) and with the various securities commissions in Canada of the Company’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004, substantially in the form presented to theBoard, subject to such changes, modifications and deletions thereto as may be approved by anyofficer of the Company, such approval to be conclusively evidenced by the filing of such Reportwith the SEC and such securities commissions in Canada, be, and it is hereby, authorized andapproved; and further       “RESOLVED, that the execution of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the yearended December 31, 2004 by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, by its Chief FinancialOfficer, by its Chief Accounting Officer, and by any of its Directors, through Stuart F. Feiner,Carl J.A. DeLuca, Thomas W. Leishman or Mark J. Travers as attorney-in-fact under powers ofattorney of each such Officer or Director, such powers of attorney to be filed with such Report,in such form as such Officer or Director may approve, such approval to be evidenced by his orher signing of such power of attorney, be, and it is hereby,authorized and approved.”  DATED at Toronto, Ontario this 14th day of March,2005.           (Signed) STUART F. FEINER    Executive Vice-President, General Counsel   and Secretary
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Thomas M. Belk, Jr., certify that: 1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Belk, Inc.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;  4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financialreporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for theregistrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, orcaused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under oursupervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability offinancial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and 5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.Date: December 7, 2006     /s/ Thomas M. Belk   Thomas M. Belk, Jr.   Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
The financial data schedule contains summary informaiton extracted from Part I
of Form 10QSB for the quarterly period ended March 31, 1999 and is qualified
in its entirety.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001051902
<NAME>                        JVWeb, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. Dollars

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                 1
<CASH>                          5104
<SECURITIES>                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                   0
<ALLOWANCES>                    0
<INVENTORY>                     8946
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                18350
<PP&E>                          4390
<DEPRECIATION>                  1335
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  21405
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           170138
<BONDS>                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        84411
<OTHER-SE>                      (233144)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    (148733)
<SALES>                         0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                0
<CGS>                           0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                252610
<LOSS-PROVISION>                0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              2618
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (255228)
<INCOME-TAX>                    0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             (255228)
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (255228)
<EPS-BASIC>                   (0.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (0.03)


</TABLE>
115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 140 

AN ACT 

To amend the White Mountain Apache Tribe Water Rights 

Quantification Act of 2010 to clarify the use of amounts 

in the WMAT Settlement Fund. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 140 ES

1 SECTION 1. USE OF FUNDS IN WMAT SETTLEMENT FUND 

2 FOR WMAT RURAL WATER SYSTEM. 

3 (a) AUTHORIZATION OF WMAT RURAL WATER SYS4 TEM.—Section 307(a) of the White Mountain Apache 

5 Tribe Water Rights Quantification Act of 2010 (Public 

6 Law 111–291; 124 Stat. 3080) is amended in the matter 

7 preceding paragraph (1) by inserting ‘‘, (b)(2),’’ after 

8 ‘‘subsections (a)’’. 

9 (b) FUNDING.—Section 312(b)(2)(C)(i)(III) of the 

10 White Mountain Apache Tribe Water Rights Quantifica11 tion Act of 2010 (Public Law 111–291; 124 Stat. 3093) 

12 is amended by striking the period at the end and inserting 

13 the following: ‘‘, including the planning, design, and con14 struction of the WMAT rural water system, in accordance 

15 with section 307(a).’’. 

Passed the Senate May 8, 2017. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 140 

AN ACT 

To amend the White Mountain Apache Tribe Water 

use of amounts in the WMAT Settlement Fund. Rights Quantification Act of 2010 to clarify the
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 176-6 Filed 10/26/2006 Page 1 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 176-6 Filed 10/26/2006 Page 2 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 176-6 Filed 10/26/2006 Page 3 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 176-6 Filed 10/26/2006 Page 4 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 176-6 Filed 10/26/2006 Page 5 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 176-6 Filed 10/26/2006 Page 6 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 176-6 Filed 10/26/2006 Page 7 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 176-6 Filed 10/26/2006 Page 8 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 176-6 Filed 10/26/2006 Page 9 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 176-6 Filed 10/26/2006 Page 10 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 176-6 Filed 10/26/2006 Page 11 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 176-6 Filed 10/26/2006 Page 12 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 176-6 Filed 10/26/2006 Page 13 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 176-6 Filed 10/26/2006 Page 14 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 176-6 Filed 10/26/2006 Page 15 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 176-6 Filed 10/26/2006 Page 16 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 176-6 Filed 10/26/2006 Page 17 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 176-6 Filed 10/26/2006 Page 18 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 176-6 Filed 10/26/2006 Page 19 of 20
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 176-6 Filed 10/26/2006 Page 20 of 20
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Kenneth A. Shewer, Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Managing Owner, Preferred Investment Solutions Corp. (the Managing Owner), of World
Monitor Trust  Series B (Series B), hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | Series Bs Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 24, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Quarterly
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Series B.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                          
|--------------------------
|/s/ Kenneth A. Shewer     
|Kenneth A. Shewer         
|Co-Chief Executive Officer
|August 8, 2005
EXHIBIT 21



                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT


                                             Jurisdiction of       Percentage
               Name                           Incorporation        Ownership

Hyde International Services, Ltd.              Hong Kong              100%

Hyde, Inc.                                     Maine                  100%

Saucony Canada, Inc.(1)                        Ontario                 85%

Saucony UK, Inc.(1)                            Massachusetts          100%

Saucony Sports, B.V.(1)                        Netherlands            100%

Saucony SP Pty. Ltd.(1)                        Australia              100%

Saucony Deutschland Vertriebs GmbH(1)          Germany                100%

QR Divestiture, Inc.(2)                        Delaware               100%

Saucony Asia Pacific Limited                   Hong Kong              100%



----------------------

(1)Does business as "Saucony."
(2)Formerly known as Quintana Roo, Inc.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE WELLBUTRIN SR/ZYBAN ANTITRUST )

LITIGATION ) Master File No. 02-CV-4398

_________________________________________ )

)

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: )

ALL ACTIONS )

_________________________________________ )

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER NO. 3

AND NOW, this 6th day of November, 2002, after an initial conference regarding the

above-captioned consolidated action, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:

1. Status Conference. Counsel for all parties shall appear for a status conference on February 5,

2003, at 11 a.m., in Courtroom 3-B, United States Courthouse, 601 Market Street, Philadelphia,

PA 19106. 

2. Deadlines for Rule 12 Motion, Response, and Reply. Defendants stated their intention to

respond to Plaintiffs’ Consolidated Class Complaint by filing a motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12. Such motion shall be filed by December 2, 2002. Plaintiffs’ response shall be filed by

January 17, 2003. Defendants shall submit any reply by February 3, 2003. 

3. Interim Conference of Counsel. Counsel shall confer as soon as possible regarding the

possibility of settlement and the parties’ desire for, and the timing of, a settlement conference. 

Counsel shall also seek consensus with respect to the following:

a) The plan for the initial phase of discovery, which shall be limited to the issue of

the merits of the patent infringement lawsuits brought by Defendants. 

b) The schedule for discovery regarding class certification.

Case 2:02-cv-04398-BWK Document 8 Filed 11/07/2002 Page 1 of 2
c) The schedule for filing further dispositive motions and responses thereto. 

4. Preliminary Statements; Stipulations. On or before November 22, 2002, Counsel 

shall submit:

a) Preliminary statements of fact as directed in Order No. 2.

b) Any stipulations regarding the items discussed during the interim conference of

Counsel.

5. Later Filed Cases. This Order shall also apply to related cases later filed in, removed to, or

transferred to this Court. 

BY THE COURT:

 

BRUCE W. KAUFFMAN, J.

 

Case 2:02-cv-04398-BWK Document 8 Filed 11/07/2002 Page 2 of 2
Before the Third Division,

September 13, 1951

No. 55880.

protest 169728-K/3223 (Chicago).

#### Naumes Forwarding Service *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of chestnuts similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Naumes Forwarding Service*v. *United States*(24 Cust. Ct. 93, C. D. 1214), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1646 was sustained.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

DAVID D. RITTER,

Petitioner

v.

LEHIGH COUNTY BOARD OF 

ELECTIONS

PETITION OF: ZAC COHEN

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 9 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Commonwealth 

Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 27th day of January, 2022, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

and the Application to File a Reply Brief in Support of Petition are DENIED.
# C_2018104EN.01003701.xml

| 19.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 104/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 104/37

---

Judgment of the General Court of 7 February 2018 — ‘Krasnyiy oktyabr’ v Kondyterska korporatsiia ‘Roshen’ (CRABS)

(Case T-795/16) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Figurative mark CRABS - Earlier international registration of the figurative mark РАКОВЫЕ ШЕЙКИ - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)))

(2018/C 104/48)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Moscow Confectionery Factory ‘Krasnyiy oktyabr’ OAO (Moscow, Russia) (represented by: O. Spuhler, M. Geitz and J. Stock, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Lukošiūtė and D. Walicka, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the Court: Dochirnie pidpryiemstvo Kondyterska korporatsiia ‘Roshen’ (Kiev, Ukraine) (represented by R. Žabolienė and I. Lukauskienė, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 August 2016 (Case R 2507/2015-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Moscow Confectionary Factory ‘Krasnyiy oktyabr’ and Dochirnie pidpryiemstvo Kondyterska korporatsiia ‘Roshen’.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Moscow Confectionery Factory ‘Krasnyiy oktyabr’ OAO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Moscow Confectionery Factory ‘Krasnyiy oktyabr’ OAO to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 6, 9.1.2017.

1

---
## Breadcrumb

            -  Home 
            -  Federal Sector 
            -           Federal Sector Appellate Decisions      

# Federal Sector Appellate Decisions

Employment discrimination complaints in the federal government are handled by the agency involved. If the individual who filed the complaint does not agree with the agency's decision, he or she can file an appeal with the EEOC. For more information about the federal sector process, please see Facts About Federal Sector Equal Employment Opportunity Complaint Processing Regulations (29 CFR Part 1614)

EEOC decisions in these appeals from **July, 2000** are available here.

*Note: Because charges outside the federal government are handled differently, there is no private sector equivalent to these decisions.*

**If you know the EEOC appeal number of the specific decision you are trying to locate, enter it below.**

**If you are looking for decisions on a particular topic, or decisions citing a specific appeal**, you may enter words or phrases related to that topic, or that appeal number, as search terms. Please note that there are some decisions not currently available; we are working to complete the collection.

## Federal Sector Appellate Decisions

## Selected Noteworthy Federal Sector Appellate Decisions

Many noteworthy federal appellate decisions are frequently used as a part of the Commission's outreach and training efforts. To help the public identify those decisions, the Commission has decided to assign randomly generated first names and initials, along with a brief summary of the decisions to the cases. Our previous practice was to refer to the appellant as "Complainant" and replaces referring to the cases as "Complainant v Federal Agency." We will update the list periodically with the most recently issued decisions.
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
    
    
    FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDEDJune 30, 2010
    
    
    June 30, 2009MERRILL LYNCH
    
    
    MERRILL LYNCH
    
    
    MERRILL LYNCH
    
    
    MERRILL LYNCHPREFERRED
    
    
    PREFERRED
    
    
    PREFERRED
    
    
    PREFERREDCAPITAL TRUST IV
    
    
    FUNDING IV, L.P.
    
    
    CAPITAL TRUST IV
    
    
    FUNDING IV, L.P.Earnings
    
    $
    7,340
    
    
    $
    8,551
    
    
    $
    7,340
    
    
    $
    8,554Fixed charges
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    Preferred securities
distribution
requirements
    
    
    7,120
    
    
    
    7,340
    
    
    
    7,120
    
    
    
    7,340Total combined fixed
charges and preferred
securities distribution
requirements
    
    $
    7,120
    
    
    $
    7,340
    
    
    $
    7,120
    
    
    $
    7,340Ratio of earnings to
combined fixed charges
and preferred securities
distribution requirements
    
    
    1.03
    
    
    
    1.16
    
    
    
    1.03
    
    
    
    1.17
 FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED
    
    
    FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDEDJune 30, 2010
    
    
    June 30, 2009MERRILL LYNCH
    
    
    MERRILL LYNCH
    
    
    MERRILL LYNCH
    
    
    MERRILL LYNCHPREFERRED
    
    
    PREFERRED
    
    
    PREFERRED
    
    
    PREFERREDCAPITAL TRUST IV
    
    
    FUNDING IV, L.P.
    
    
    CAPITAL TRUST IV
    
    
    FUNDING IV, L.P.Earnings
    
    $
    14,680
    
    
    $
    17,103
    
    
    $
    14,680
    
    
    $
    17,109Fixed charges
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    Preferred securities
distribution
requirements
    
    
    14,240
    
    
    
    14,680
    
    
    
    14,240
    
    
    
    14,680Total combined fixed
charges and preferred
securities distribution
requirements
    
    $
    14,240
    
    
    $
    14,680
    
    
    $
    14,240
    
    
    $
    14,680Ratio of earnings to
combined fixed charges
and preferred securities
distribution requirements
    
    
    1.03
    
    
    
    1.17
    
    
    
    1.03
    
    
    
    1.17
EX- 99.6

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

                                  CERTIFICATION
By signing below, each of the undersigned officers hereby certifies pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that, to his or her knowledge, (i) this report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and (ii) the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Indiana
Gas Company, Inc.

Signed this 18th day of June, 2003.







/s/ Jerome A. Benkert, Jr.              /s/ Niel C. Ellerbrook
----------------------------------      -------------------------------------
(Signature of Authorized Officer)       (Signature of Authorized Officer)


Jerome A. Benkert, Jr.                  Niel C. Ellerbrook
----------------------------------      -------------------------------------
(Typed Name)                            (Typed Name)


Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer                       Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
----------------------------------      -------------------------------------
(Title)                                 (Title)