alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND
                   CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF IEH CORPORATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with this Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report of IEH Corporation
(the  "Company")  on Form 10-K for the year ending  March 27, 2009 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  being,  Michael  Offerman,  President and Chief Executive  Officer
(Principal  Executive  Officer),  and  Robert  Knoth,  Chief  Financial  Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer), of the Company,  respectfully certify,  pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of the Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)      The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


Dated:  August 6, 2009


/s/ Michael Offerman                              /s/ Robert Knoth
--------------------                              ----------------
Michael Offerman                                  Robert Knoth
President and Chief Executive Officer             Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)                     (Principal Accounting Officer)




This Certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002,  and shall not be deemed  "filed" by the  Company  for  purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934,  as amended,  whether  made before or after the date of the Report,
irrespective of any general  incorporation  language contained in such filing. A
signed  original  of the  written  statement  required  by Section  906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



                                      -12-
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 15 Filed 07/08/2002 Page 1 of 12
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 15 Filed 07/08/2002 Page 2 of 12
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 15 Filed 07/08/2002 Page 3 of 12
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 15 Filed 07/08/2002 Page 4 of 12
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 15 Filed 07/08/2002 Page 5 of 12
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 15 Filed 07/08/2002 Page 6 of 12
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 15 Filed 07/08/2002 Page 7 of 12
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 15 Filed 07/08/2002 Page 8 of 12
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 15 Filed 07/08/2002 Page 9 of 12
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 15 Filed 07/08/2002 Page 10 of 12
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 15 Filed 07/08/2002 Page 11 of 12
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 15 Filed 07/08/2002 Page 12 of 12
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-19-0000585

20-NOV-2020

07:58 AM

Dkt. 70 OP
No. 59962.

#### Albert F. Maurer Company *v.*United States,

protests 204013-K and 206101-K (Philadelphia).

*450Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise in question consists of battery plates in the form of antimonial lead scrap, of which nonferrous metal is the component material in chief value, which are secondhand or waste or refuse, or are obsolete, defective, or damaged, and which are fit only to be remanu-factured. Upon the agreed statement of facts, it was held that the merchandise comes within the provisions of Public Law 869, as amended by Public Law 535, *supra,*and is properly entitled to free entry.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                          15,085
<SECURITIES>                                       249
<RECEIVABLES>                                      735
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,867
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                23,250
<PP&E>                                          63,006
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (8,545)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 133,883
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,025
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            28
<OTHER-SE>                                      19,292
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   133,883
<SALES>                                        244,410
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               244,879
<CGS>                                           65,211
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  227,996
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   230
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               8,092
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  8,561
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,467
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,561
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,094
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.82
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.47


</TABLE>
IEH CORPORATION

                                   EXHIBIT 11

Statement re: Computation of Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share


Net income or (loss) per common  share is computed by dividing the net income or
(loss) by the weighted average number of common shares  outstanding  during each
year as follows:

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                     Fiscal Year Ended

                                           March 28,                 March 29,
                                             1997                      1996
                                          ----------                ----------
<S>                                       <C>                       <C>
Income (Loss) before income taxes ...     $  113,926                $  (70,312)

Net Income (Loss) ...................     $  105,709                $ ( 95,518)


Weighted Average Number of
  Common Shares Outstanding .........      2,303,502                 2,303,502

Income (Loss) per common share before
  income taxes ......................     $      .05                $     (.03)


Net Income (Loss) per
  Common Share ......................     $      .05                $     (.04)


</TABLE>
# March 2015

# April 2015

# May 2015

# June 2015

# July 2015

# August 2015

# September 2015

# October 2015

# November 2015

# December 2015

# January 2016

# February 2016

# March 2016

# April 2016

# May 2016

# June 2016

# July 2016

# August 2016

# September 2016

# FY 2017 October 2016

# November 2016

# December 2016

# January 2017

# February 2017

# March 2017

# April 2017

# May 2017
No. 66766.

#### Panation Trade Co. and W. J. Byrnes & Co. of New York, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 60/19067, 60/22580, and 60/22953 (New York).

*453Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of rosary bracelets the same in all material respects as those the subject of *The J. Orlando Co., Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 115, C.D. 2114), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
EXHIBIT 31.1

Certification

I, Joseph J. Bouffard, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of BCSB Bancorp, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying
officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: July 31, 2007



/s/ Joseph J. BouffardJoseph J. BouffardPresident(Principal Executive Officer)
<TABLE>
                      

                       INDIANAPOLIS POWER & LIGHT COMPANY          EXHIBIT 12.1

                       Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

<CAPTION>

                                                                 YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                 ------------------------------------------------------
                                                     1998                1997                 1996
                                                 --------------      --------------       -------------
                                                                 (Thousands of Dollars)
Earnings, as defined:
<S>                                              <C>                 <C>                 <C>     
     Net income (1)                                   $149,147            $133,402            $122,588
     Income taxes                                       84,386              74,440              67,266
     Fixed charges, as below                            40,991              41,893              48,570
                                                 --------------      --------------       -------------

         Total earnings, as defined                   $274,524            $249,735            $238,424
                                                 ==============      ==============       =============

Fixed charges, as defined:
     Interest charges                                  $40,810             $41,721             $48,406
     Rental interest factor                                181                 172                 164
                                                 --------------      --------------       -------------

         Total fixed charges, as defined               $40,991             $41,893             $48,570
                                                 ==============      ==============       =============

Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                        6.70                5.96                4.91
                                                 ==============      ==============       =============

(1) 1997 Net income excludes after-tax effect of cumulative effect
of accounting change
</TABLE>
No. 51658.

#### Protest 113505-K of C. J. Tower & Sons (Buffalo).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that passed upon in *Tower & Sons*v. *United States*(14 Cust. Ct. 94, C. D. 919). In accordance therewith the claim for free entry was sustained.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA :

:

v. : CRIMINAL NO. 05-170-5

:

CHRISTOPHER BOOKER :

AND NOW, this 7th day of December, 2012, upon consideration of Defendant’s 

“Amended Motion to Suppress Post-Arrest Statements” (Docket No. 445), all documents filed in 

connection therewith, and the Hearings held on November 2, 2006 and November 14, 2012, IT 

IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ John R. Padova

_________________________

John R. Padova, J.
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Merrill Lynch
Preferred Capital Trust IV and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding IV, L.P.
(the "Partnership") for the period ended September 28, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Gary Carlin, Controller of Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., the General
Partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Partnership.




                              MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING IV, L.P.

                              By:  MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC., as General Partner


                              By:  /s/ GARY CARLIN
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                              Name:    Gary Carlin *
                              Title:   Controller, Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.








Dated: November 9, 2007
______________________

*  Gary Carlin functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
   and Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership for purposes of Section 906
   of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
(Reap. Dec. 10971)

#### Elof Hansson, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 794064-1/2

(Decided May 4, 1965)

*Sharp & Bogan*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Rao, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

> *641IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the undersigned, subject to the approval of the Court:

> 1. That the subject merchandise consists of hardboard exported from Sweden as to which the Secretary of the Treasury issued a finding of dumping, published in 89 TD 197, TD 53567, made pursuant to the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C., 160, et seq.).

> 2. That pursuant to Section 168 of said Antidumping Act, the appraiser reported the purchase price (See. 162) and the foreign market value (Sec. 161) as to the merchandise listed on Schedule A attached hereto and made a part hereof.

> 3. That pursuant to Sections 500 and 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, the appraiser, appraised all of the merchandise in the appeals for appraisement enumerated on Schedule A for regular duty purposes.

> 4. That the plaintiff duly filed appeals for reappraisement as to the values referred to in the above paragraphs Nos. 2 and 3.

> 5. That at the times relevant herein the purchase price and the foreign market value under the said Antidumping Act are as specified in the aforesaid Schedule A attached hereto.

> 6. That as to all other items of merchandise not identified on Schedule A, the appraiser’s reports of purchase price and of foreign market value are correct.

> 7. That the appraiser’s findings of value under the provisions of section 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, are correct.

> 8. That said appeals are submitted for decision upon this stipulation and said Schedule A.

Upon the agreed facts, I find foreign market value, as defined in section 164 of the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C. § 164), for the merchandise described in schedule A, annexed to this decision and made a part hereof, and the purchase price thereof, within section 162 of said act (19'U.S.O. § 162), to be as indicated in said schedule. As to all other items of merchandise not identified in schedule A, I find the foreign market values and purchases prices to be as reported by the appraiser. In all other respects, the values of all merchandise are as returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Exhibit 23.1
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


We consent to the  incorporation by reference in the  Registration  Statement of
Saucony, Inc. on Forms S-8 (file numbers 33-50922, 33-61532, 33-66482, 33-80726,
333-33485)  of  our  report  dated  February  7,  2000,  on  our  audits  of the
consolidated  financial  statements and financial statement schedule of Saucony,
Inc.  and  Subsidiaries  as of December 31, 1999 and January 1, 1999 and for the
years ended December 31, 1999,  January 1, 1999 and January 2, 1998 which report
is included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.




/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
March 27, 2000
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-28-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               FEB-28-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,111
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,111
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  30,111
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          109,176
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     9,948,324
<OTHER-SE>                                     (79,065)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    30,111
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      0
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                         0
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
April 6, 1960

No. 64073.

Suit 5029.

#### United States *v.*Camley International Co., Inc.

(Appeal dismissed February 2, 1960.)
No. 52556.

petitions 6529-R and 6530-R (Detroit).

#### G. R. Kirk Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cline, J.

At the trial the traffic manager of the petitioner testified that the merchandise came from various places in Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, and Quebec; that representatives of the company went into the field, contacted the suppliers in advance, and made arrangements with them as to the prices they were going to pay; and that it was on the basis of information obtained from them that the witness notified the brokers as to the prices to be used in making entry. The witness further stated that petitioner was advised by the brokers that there had been advances in value by the appraiser; that petitioner had instructed them to file appeals for reappraisement; and that the question of value was litigated over a period of years from 1939 to 1945. On the record presented it was held that the petitioner acted without intention to defraud the revenue of .the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the case or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petitions were therefore granted.
# Spreadsheet

# Beginning

Change in Obligated Balances
No. 61300.

protest 267097-K (New York).

#### Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

The issue presented herein was decided adversely to plaintiff’s contention in *Dale Products Corp. et al.*v. *United States*(31 Cust. Ct. 170, C. D. 1565) and *United States*v. *Astra Trading Corp.*(44 C. C. P. A. 8, C. A. D. 627). When the case was called for trial, plaintiff requested a continuance pending trial of a new test ease. The request was denied and an order of dismissal for lack of prosecution was entered. The protest was, therefore, dismissed.
M



# Fourth Court of Appea **ls**

**San Antonio, Texas**

May 29, 2015

N o. 04

- 14

- 00785

- CV

Mary Ann CASTRO

, Appellant

v.

Manuel CASTRO

, Appellee

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011

- CI

- 15957 Honorable Janet P. Littlejohn, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

On May 21, 2015, appellant filed a motion asking this court to deny the motion to withdraw filed by appellee’s counsel. This court granted the motion the motion to withdraw on May 20, 2015, before appellant filed her motion. Accordingly, we DENY AS MOOT appellant’s motion to deny counsel’s request to withdraw. Then, on May 27, 2015, appellant

filed two additional motions

– a motion to disqualify appellee’ s counsel, seemingly contrary to her May 21, 2015 motion asking us to deny the motion to withdraw, and a motion “to void” the extension of time this court granted with regard to the filing of appellee’s brief, which was granted based on the withdrawal of a ppellee’s counsel. We have reviewed the May 27, 2015

motions and DENY them as well

.

_________________________________ Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 29th day of May, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
# Sum of Change - S2 14-01

# Additional Information