alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MARA FLAMM : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. :

:

SARNER & ASSOCIATES, P.C.; JOSHUA SARNER; : NO. 02-4302

LEONARD SARNER, ESQUIRE; :

JODI H. BROWN, M.D.; JOHN MATUSAVAGE; :

JOHN DOE PROCESS SERVER, INDIVIDUALLY AND :

AS AGENT FOR SARNER 7 ASSOCIATES, P.C.; :

JOSHUA SARNER, ESQUIRE; LEONARD SARNER, :

ESQUIRE; AND JODI H. BROWN, M.D. :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 10th day of January, 2005, upon consideration of correspondence to the

Court from Plaintiff’s counsel dated January 10, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that the Telephone

Status Conference which was scheduled for January 11, 2005, is CONTINUED, and it will now

be held on January 21, 2005, at 4:00 p.m. in order to determine the status of Defendant

Matusavage’s deposition, to set a time frame for dispositive motions, and to explore the possibility

of a resolution on the matter. The Court shall initiate this conference call.

BY THE COURT:

 

M. FAITH ANGELL

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 65 Filed 01/11/2005 Page 1 of 1
**Government-wide Reporting Challenges**

· While there have been improvements in interoperability over the years, Treasury still runs **disparate data collection systems** that cause reporting redundancies for agencies.

· While Treasury has been working toward **standardizing** data elements collected from federal agencies, the reporting of financial information remains customized at both the agency and government-wide levels. In addition, the **same reporting requirements** exist for the agency community regardless of size.

· There is **redundant reporting** from Treasury and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) that causes **reporting inconsistencies**, or the appearance of inconsistent data in some cases.

· While Treasury and federal agencies meet legislative reporting timelines, **information is not always provided timely** enough for users to make informed decisions.
**Proposed FY 2020 Changes to Loan Guarantee Liability Transaction Codes (TCs):**

**1) Proposed TC Modification to Record Loan Guarantee Fees Earned, But Not Yet Collected:**

**C428**To record loans, interest, and fees receivable from non-Federal sources for defaulted guaranteed loans and loan guarantee activity. Do not consider as a budgetary resource until collected.

**Comment:**Applicable to activity for guaranteed loans.

**Budgetary Entry**

None

**Proprietary Entry**

Debit 131000 Accounts Receivable

Debit 134100 Interest Receivable – Loans

Debit 135000 Loans Receivable

	Credit 139900 Allowance for Subsidy

****Credit 218000 Loan Guarantee Liability

**Justification:**The addition of USSGL 131000 Accounts Receivable allows agencies to record loan guarantee fee earned, but not yet collected, to a receivable account and the offsetting Loan Guarantee Liability account.  Once cash is ultimately collected, agencies should record TC A140 and C109.

**2) Proposed New TC Addition to Record Loan Guarantee Claims Incurred, But Not Yet Disbursed:**

**B417**To record in a loan guarantee financing account an accrued expense to a third party, in which no asset is received.  This transaction includes payments of incurred default claims, interest supplements, and other loan guarantee financing claims.

**Comment:**Only post this transaction for claims within a loan guarantee financing account that are incurred, but not yet disbursed.  At the time of disbursement to a third-party, post USSGL TC-B110.

**Reference:**USSGL implementation guidance; Credit Reform Case Studies

**Budgetary Entry**

Debit 461000 Allotments - Realized Resources

   	Credit 490100 Delivered Orders - Obligations, Unpaid

**Proprietary Entry**

218000 Loan Guarantee Liability

	211000 Accounts Payable

**Justification:**The addition of TC B417 allows agencies to record loan guarantee claims incurred, but not yet disbursed, directly to the Loan Guarantee Liability account.  Once cash is ultimately disbursed, agencies should record TC B110.

2                                                                      IRC Handout 12/05/19

# image1.png

# image2.png
DRAFT IV IRC Handout December 5, 2019

Part 1 Fiscal Year 2019 Reporting

SUPPLEMENT SECTION IV

USSGL ACCOUNT ATTRIBUTE DEFINITION REPORT

Attribute

Name 

Short 

Name 

Attribute 

Definition Domain

System 

Chars Reference

Supplied

By 

Disaster Emergency 

Fund Code

DEFC Distinguishes whether the budgetary resources, obligations 

incurred, unobligated and obligated balances, and outlays are 

classified as disaster, emergency, or neither. Note - Once a 

disaster has been identified, the title "Disaster and Emergency 

Item 1" for example will be replaced with the actual title 

identified by OMB such as "Emergency PL 115-56."

A - Emergency PL 115-56

B - Emergency PL 115-72

C - Emergency PL 115-123

D - Emergency PL 115-254

E - Emergency PL 116-20

F - Emergency PL 116-26

G - Disaster and Emergency Item 7

H - Disaster and Emergency Item 8

I - Disaster and Emergency Item 9

J - Disaster and Emergency Item 10

Q - Non Disaster or Emergency

1/A OMB 

Guidance/TFM

Bulk File
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

SUSANNE H. LINN, et al. : CIVIL ACTION

:

 v. :

:

NORTHAMPTON COUNTY, et al. : NO. 02-4417

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of August, 2003, it is Ordered

that the Final Pretrial Conference scheduled for Monday, August

18, 2003 at 4:15 p.m. is canceled until further notice of the

court.

ATTEST: or BY THE COURT

BY: 

 Deputy Clerk

 Anita B. Brody, J.

Civ 12 (9/83)

Copies FAXED on _________ to: Copies MAILED on ____________ to:

Case 2:02-cv-04417-AB Document 35 Filed 08/06/2003 Page 1 of 1
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 2SUPPLEMENT&"Arial,Regular"	&"Arial,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2020 ReportingSection VII&"Arial,Regular"

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2020-10	&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000DRAFT&K000000 VII VDR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout 2/13/20
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6482

SPELLMAN B. SMITH, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District

Judge. (CA-96-190-AM)

Submitted: June 20, 1996 Decided: July 2, 1996

Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed in part and dismissed in part by unpublished per curiam

opinion.

Spellman B. Smith, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his

motion for a temporary restraining order and/or a preliminary injunction. Appellant sought to prevent the implementation of a

prison regulation governing contraband.

To the extent that Appellant appeals the denial of a temporary

restraining order, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction

because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1988);

Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337

U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order

nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

To the extent that Appellant appeals the denial of injunctive

relief, we have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. Smith v. Angelone, No. CA-96-190-

AM (E.D. Va. Feb. 20, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED IN PART AND DISMISSED IN PART
```

                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.2

               CERTIFICATION UNDER SARBANES-OXLEY ACT SECTION 906

     Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Industrial Development Bank of Israel Limited ("the
Company"), herby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:

     The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the
"Report") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and all information contained in
the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: September 11, 2008

                                                     /s/ Rimon Shmaya
                                                     ----------------
                                                     Comptroller
```
ARTICLES OF AMENDMENT
                    (General Laws, Chapter 15613, Section 72)


                          We, Brian D. Pardo, President,
                           and R. Scott Peden, Clerk,

                                 of I.G.E. Inc.

                 located at 291 Washington St. Duxbury MA 02332
                (Street address of corporation in Massachusetts)
      certify that these Articles of Amendment affecting articles numbered: 1

             of the Articles of Organization were duly adopted at a
            meeting held on January 20, 2000, by vote of:

       10,000,000 shares of common stock of 10,000,000 shares outstanding,


              The name by which the corporation shall be known is:

                          LIFE PARTNERS HOLDINGS, INC.


The  foregoing  amendment(s)  will  become  effective  when  these  Articles  of
Amendment are filed in accordance  with General  Laws,  Chapter 156B,  Section 6
unless  these  articles  specify,  in  accordance  with  the vote  adopting  the
amendment,  a later  effective date not more than thirty days after such filing,
in which event the amendment will become effective on such later date.

Later effective date:

SIGNED UNDER THE PENALTIES OF PERJURY, this 20th day of January, 2000,

                                        /s/Brian D. Pardo
                                        --------------------------------
                                        Brian D. Pardo, President
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 1SUPPLEMENT&"Arial,Regular"	&"Arial,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2019 ReportingSection VII&"Arial,Regular"

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2019-10	&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000DRAFT&K000000 VII VDR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout 4/23/19
BEFORE THE SECOND DIVISION,

June 7, 1956

No. 60011.

#### Bemo Shipping Company *v.*United States,

protest 232408-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of castings wholly of cast iron which have been chiseled, drilled, machined, or otherwise advanced in condition by operations or processes subsequent to the casting process, but have not been made up into articles, or parts thereof, or finished machine parts, and that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that involved in *United States*v. *Grinnell Co.*(16 Ct. Cust. Appls. 255, T. D. 42844), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
(Reap. Dec. 10692)

#### Berben Corporation *v.*United States

Entry No. 107258, etc.

(Decided March 10, 1964)

*Barnes Richardson & Colburn*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

*471LawRENCe, Judge:

Tlie appeals for a reappraisement enumerated in the schedule attached to and made part of the decision herein have been consolidated for purposes of decision. Involved therein is the question of the proper value for dutiable purposes of certain merchandise described on the invoices as pistols, rifles, or shotguns.

The parties hereto have entered into a stipulation of fact wherein it has been agreed as follows:

> That the appeals for reappraisement listed in Schedule “A” hereto attached and made a part hereof are limited to the merchandise described on the invoices as pistols, rifles or shotguns, with or without other words of description, and exported by the firm of Pietro Beretta, Italy, during the years 1952, 1953 and 1954.

> That the issues are similar in all material respects to the issues involved in *Bergen Corporation*v. *United States,*Reap. Dec. 10552, and that the record therein may be incorporated herein.

> That at the time of exportation such or similar merchandise was not freely offered for sale for home consumption in Italy or for exportation to the United States, and was likewise not freely offered for sale in the United States.

> That at the time of exportation the cost of production of the merchandise involved herein, as defined in See. 402(f), Tariff Act of 1930, was the entered value.

Upon the agreed facts of record, I find and bold that cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402(f) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1402(f)), is the proper basis for determining the value of the items of merchandise in issue and that said value is the entered values. As to all other merchandise, the appeals are dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

: CIVIL ACTION NOS.

:

ELKINS : 02-1527

GRANT : 02-1943

MURPHY : 02-3866

RENER : 02-3870

JACKSON : 02-3900

MARUSHI, et al. : 02-3914

MORRIS : 02-3953

FORTNER : 02-3961

MACHALA : 02-3984

RAMIREZ, et al. : 02-4114

THEODORAN : 02-4123

STOPHER : 02-4147

COPENHAVER, et al. : 02-4187

PERERA : 02-4205

BERUMEN, et al. : 02-4238

RISLEY, et al. : 02-4246

MONTGOMERY, et al. : 02-4280

MILLER, et al. : 02-4281

DUBOIS : 02-4317

EDUVALA, et al. : 02-4327

:

VS. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION, et al. :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of July, 2002, the Court having been previously

advised that the above action cannot proceed to trial and disposition because of the following

reason:

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending disposition of a related

action.

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending determination of

arbitration proceedings.

[ ] - Interlocutory appeal filed.

Case 2:02-cv-04317-AB Document 2 Filed 07/17/2002 Page 1 of 2
[ X ] - Other: Case is placed into suspense pending receipt of the Case

Transfer Order from the Judicial Panel on Multi District Litigation

transferring case to District of Minnesota.

It is

ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this action closed for statistical purposes and

place the matter in the Civil Suspense File, and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction; and that the case be

restored to the trial docket when the action is in a status so that it may proceed to final

disposition; this order shall not prejudice the rights of the parties to this litigation.

BY THE COURT:

________________________________________

Anita B. Brody, Judge

Case 2:02-cv-04317-AB Document 2 Filed 07/17/2002 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 87-6 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 1 of 25
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 87-6 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 2 of 25
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 87-6 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 3 of 25
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 87-6 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 4 of 25
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 87-6 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 5 of 25
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 87-6 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 6 of 25
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 87-6 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 7 of 25
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 87-6 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 8 of 25
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 87-6 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 9 of 25
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 87-6 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 10 of 25
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 87-6 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 11 of 25
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 87-6 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 12 of 25
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 87-6 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 13 of 25
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 87-6 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 14 of 25
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 87-6 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 15 of 25
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 87-6 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 16 of 25
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 87-6 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 17 of 25
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 87-6 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 18 of 25
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 87-6 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 19 of 25
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 87-6 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 20 of 25
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 87-6 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 21 of 25
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 87-6 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 22 of 25
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 87-6 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 23 of 25
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 87-6 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 24 of 25
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 87-6 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 25 of 25
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 2SUPPLEMENT &"Arial,Regular"	&"Arial,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2021 ReportingSection VII  

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2021-07	&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000DRAFT&K000000 VII VDR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout 12/3/20
**T/L S2 14-01IV  - 3IRC Handout April 22, 2014**
**GENERAL FUND RECEIPT (GFR) ACCOUNT GUIDE**

**Effective Fiscal 2021**

## **Scenario 4: Non-Custodial Statement Collections: Collection of Receivables From Canceled Authority**

**Canceled Appropriation**

Agencies must close appropriation accounts available for obligation during a definite period on September 30th of the fifth fiscal year after the account’s obligational availability ends.  Cancel any remaining balances (whether obligated or unobligated) in the account.  

**Beginning Trial Balance – Expired Account which is Canceling**

**Year 6 (September 30 of 5th expired year)**

Also Post:

**Year 6 – Preclosing Adjusted Trial Balance**

**Financial Statements:**

**Reclassified Financial Statements:**

**Closing Entries:**

**Year 6 (September 30 of 5th expired year) – Post-Closing Trial Balance**

**Year 7 – 1st Quarter**

Also Post:

**Year 7 - Preclosing Trial Balance**

**Financial Statements:**

**Year 7 – 4th Quarter**

Also Post:

**Year 7 – Preclosing Trial Balance**

**Year 7 – Preclosing Adjusting Entry**

**Year 7 – Preclosing Adjusted Trial Balance**

**Closing Entries:**

**Post-Closing Trial Balance:**

                                                                                                                     Page 1 of 24                                               IRC Handout July 16, 2020
No. 51652.

#### Protests 842595-G, etc., of Gimbel Bros., Inc., Delaware, et al. (New. York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). In accordance therewith the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANTTO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofNational Equipment Services, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Michael D. Milligan, ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, asadopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to myknowledge:

 

(1)          TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ MICHAEL D. MILLIGAN |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
|                    |
| Michael D. Milligan     |
| Chief Financial Officer |
| May 13, 2003            |

 

----
Part 1

SUPPLEMENT

DRAFT 

No. USSGL Account Title Anticipated Budg/Prop

Norm 

Bal

Begin/

End

Debit/

Credit

Auth

Type 

Code

Apport 

Cat

Apport 

Cat B

Avail 

Time

BEA 

Cat

Borrow 

Source

Budgetary

Impact

Indicator

Cohort

 Yr

Cust/

Noncust

Exch/

Nonexch

Fed

NonF

214000 Accrued Interest Payable - Not Otherwise Classified N P C B/E D/C F/G/

415700

Authority Made Available From Receipt or Appropriation BalancesPreviously Precluded From Obligation N B D E D/C C/P 

439700

Receipts and Appropriations Temporarily Precluded FromObligation N B C B/E D/C C/P D/M 

633000 Other Interest Expenses N P D E D/C A/S F/G/N

U.S. Government Standard General Ledger

Attributes to Accounts Report

USSGL ACCOUNT USSGL ACCOUNT ATTR

- USSGL ATTRIBUTES BULK FILE ATTRIBUTES 

DRAFT 1 of 1
# sec5_balsheet

&"Arial,Bold"&10DRAFT	&"Arial,Bold"&10V BS - &P	&"Arial,Bold"&10 February 2024
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Roger K. Brooks, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of AmerUs Group Co.,certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of AmerUs Group Co.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared; b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and34-47986]; c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Dated: August 6, 2004   By /s/ Roger K. Brooks   Roger K. Brooks   Chairman and   Chief Executive Officer   AmerUs Group Co.
46
Case 2:05-cv-04874-PBT Document 49 Filed 01/07/08 Page 1 of 10
Case 2:05-cv-04874-PBT Document 49 Filed 01/07/08 Page 2 of 10
Case 2:05-cv-04874-PBT Document 49 Filed 01/07/08 Page 3 of 10
Case 2:05-cv-04874-PBT Document 49 Filed 01/07/08 Page 4 of 10
Case 2:05-cv-04874-PBT Document 49 Filed 01/07/08 Page 5 of 10
Case 2:05-cv-04874-PBT Document 49 Filed 01/07/08 Page 6 of 10
Case 2:05-cv-04874-PBT Document 49 Filed 01/07/08 Page 7 of 10
Case 2:05-cv-04874-PBT Document 49 Filed 01/07/08 Page 8 of 10
Case 2:05-cv-04874-PBT Document 49 Filed 01/07/08 Page 9 of 10
Case 2:05-cv-04874-PBT Document 49 Filed 01/07/08 Page 10 of 10