alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(Reap. Dec. 10352)

Entry No. 47283, etc.

#### Radio Corp. of America *v.*United States

(Decided October 17, 1962)

*Sha/rretts, Paley & Garter*for the plaintiff.

*Joseph D. Guilfoyle,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement enumerated in schedule “B,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, are before me for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the parties hei'eto that the merchandise which is the subject of the appeals for reappraisement listed in Schedule B, hereto attached and made a part hereof, consists of phonograph records exported from Mexico after November, 1958.

> *418IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that phonograph records are not on the list of articles published in T.D. 54521 and are subject to appraisement under the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 (Public Law 927 — 84th Congress 2nd Session).

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the prices, at the time of exportation to the United States of the merchandise undergoing re-appraisement, at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold or, in the absence of sales, offered for sale in the principal markets of the country of exportation, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other expenses incidental to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, were the prices shown on Schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof for each of the items enumerated therein with or without qualifying words and with or without additional symbols.

On the agreed, facts, I find that the proper basis for appraisement of the phonograph records in question is statutory export value and hold that such value therefor is the prices shown in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, for each of the items enumerated therein with or without qualifying words and with or without additional symbols.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

SCOTT RUFFING, et al : CIVIL ACTION

Plaintiff :

: NO. 02-CV-4422

 vs. :

:

KALMAR INDUSTRIES, U.S.A., INC., et al :

Defendant :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 16th day of July, 2003, it having been reported that the issues

between the parties in the above action have been settled and upon Order of the Court

pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1(b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure, it is

ORDERED that the above action is DISMISSED with prejudice, pursuant to agreement of

counsel without costs.

BY THE COURT:

________________________________

TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE, J.

Case 2:02-cv-04422-TJS Document 27 Filed 07/16/2003 Page 1 of 1
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF
CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE
  (i)
    
    the Quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September
30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Roger K. Brooks

Roger K. BrooksChairman and Chief Executive OfficerAmerUs Group Co.
# sec4_attribtable_2021

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2021-07	&"Arial,Bold"&9IV AT - &P	&"Arial,Bold"&10IRC Meeting Handout December 3, 2020
|EXHIBIT 32
|----------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amendment #1 to the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A1 of Westsphere Asset Corporation, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kim Law, Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date: May 4, 2007                                            |  | By:  /s/ Kim Law
|------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ----------------
|                                                             |  |                 
|Name: Kim Law                                               
|Title: Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer

---
No. 48450.

#### Protests 826863-G, etc., of Shaker N. Arida et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
# C_2016175EN.01001301.xml

| 17.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 175/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 175/13

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Attunda tingsrätt (Sweden) lodged on 21 March 2016 — Airhelp Limited v Thomas Cook Airlines Scandinavia A/S

(Case C-161/16)

(2016/C 175/15)

Language of the case: Swedish

Referring court

Referring court

Attunda tingsrätt

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Airhelp Limited

Applicant:

Defendants: Thomas Cook Airlines Scandinavia A/S

Defendants:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Must Articles 2(g) and 3(2)(a) of the regulation (1) be interpreted as meaning that a passenger must have a reserved seat (that is to say, the right to his own seat in the aeroplane) or is it sufficient for the passenger to have received confirmation of his booking on the flight (that is to say, the right to be transported in the aeroplane) for compensation to be payable? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Must Articles 2(g) and 3(2)(a) of the regulation (1) be interpreted as meaning that a passenger must have a reserved seat (that is to say, the right to his own seat in the aeroplane) or is it sufficient for the passenger to have received confirmation of his booking on the flight (that is to say, the right to be transported in the aeroplane) for compensation to be payable?

1

| 2. | Must a ticket at a reduced fare for a child who does not have his own seat for the flight, but travels in the company of another passenger, be regarded as available directly or indirectly to the public under Article 3(3) of the regulation? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Must a ticket at a reduced fare for a child who does not have his own seat for the flight, but travels in the company of another passenger, be regarded as available directly or indirectly to the public under Article 3(3) of the regulation?

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (OJ L 46, 2004, p. 1).

1

---
# INCO LIMITED

# EXHIBIT INDEX TO
ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002

| | Exhibit No. | Exhibit                                                                                                      
| | ----------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 3(ii)(b)    | Standing Resolution of the Registrant as amended to April 16, 2002                                           
| | 21          | Subsidiaries of Inco Limited                                                                                 
| | 23          | Consent of Independent Accountants                                                                           
| | 23          | Consents of Robert A. Horn and Robert C. Osborne, each as a Qualified Person under National Instrument 43-101
| | 24(a)       | Powers of Attorney                                                                                           
| | 24(b)       | Resolution of the Board of Directors of the Registrant                                                       
| | 99          | Proxy Circular and Statement dated February 10, 2003*                                                        

---

*
Portions of the Proxy Circular and Statement are incorporated by reference in Part III of
this Report.
1 Ordinarily, courts will not grant motions to withdraw unless arrangements for new

counsel have been made. In this case, however, Plaintiff has shown a willingness to proceed pro

se. See Rose The Morning Call, 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3912 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 28, 1997) (“it is

clear that plaintiff no longer wishes to be represented by [counsel of record, and] prefers to

proceed pro se in this matter.” Moreover, it is clear that the lawyer-counsel relationship has

irretrievably broken down. See Wolgin v. Smith, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 12437 (E.D. Pa. Aug.

21, 1996).

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MARTHA STEELE

v.

HCI DIRECT

:

: CIVIL ACTION

:

: NO. 02-4347

:

ORDER

AND NOW, this 28th day of February, 2005, upon consideration of Counsel’s Motion

to Withdraw as Attorney for Plaintiff (docket no. 37) and pursuant to Local Rule of Civil

Procedure 5.1(c), it is ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED.1 It is FURTHER

ORDERED that Plaintiff may now proceed in this matter pro se.

BY THE COURT:

S/Bruce W. Kauffman 

BRUCE W. KAUFFMAN, J.

Case 2:02-cv-04347-BWK Document 43 Filed 03/01/2005 Page 1 of 1
Before the Second Division,

June 18, 1943

No. 48402.

#### Protest 867013-G of Walker Goulard Plehn Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

At the trial the witness for the plaintiff testified that the merchandise in question had the thickness of exactly twelve one-thousandths of an inch and that it is used as a reinforcement on a handle for merchandising envelopes. However, on cross-examination he admitted that he only saw the merchandise thus used subsequent to the importation in question. He further testified that prior to June 17, 1930, he saw it used for container board and explained that by “container board” is meant “Sulphate container board used for corrugated boxes, suit boxes and things like that.” No claim, however, has been made that it is container board, but it was not shown whether the merchandise in question comes within the provision in paragraph 1413 for “test or container boards” as specified therein. The witness also testified that the merchandise is not flexible enough to be suitable for wrapping paper. On the record presented the court was unable to determine the proper classification of the merchandise. The protest was therefore overruled without affirming the action of the collector.
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document











 



 
 

Exhibit 4.15    
    


July 2,
2008 


Alberta
Securities Commission

British Columbia Securities Commission

Saskatchewan Financial Services Commission, Securities Division

The Manitoba Securities Commission

Ontario Securities Commission

Autorité des marchés financiers

Nova Scotia Securities Commission

Securities Office, Prince Edward Island

New Brunswick Securities Commission

Securities Commission of Newfoundland and Labrador

Northwest Territories Securities Registry

Yukon Territory Securities Registry

Nunavut Securities Registry 


Re:    TransCanada
Corporation (the "Corporation") 


Dear
Sirs: 


        We
refer to a final short form base shelf prospectus dated July 2, 2008 of the Corporation (the "Prospectus"), referring to the qualification for distribution of securities
of the Corporation. 


        We
hereby consent to the references to our firm name on the cover page of the Prospectus and under the headings "Legal Matters," "Interest of Experts" and "Documents Filed as Part of the
Registration Statement". 


Very
truly yours, 


(Signed)
Mayer Brown LLP

Mayer Brown LLP 











QuickLinks



Exhibit 4.15
----

----

I Mitteilungen

Kommission

----

Mitteilung der Kommission im Rahmen der Durchführung der Richtlinie 1999/5/EG des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 9. März 1999 über Funkanlagen und Telekommunikationsendeinrichtungen und die gegenseitige Anerkennung ihrer Konformität

(2006/C 201/01)

(Text von Bedeutung für den EWR)

(Veröffentlichung der Titel und der Bezugsdaten der harmonisierten Normen im Sinne dieser Richtlinie)

Beispiel: Für EN 60215:1989 gilt Folgendes:

Anmerkung:

----

(1)

----

----

Mitteilung der Kommission im Rahmen der Durchführung der Richtlinie 89/336/EWG des Rates vom 3. Mai 1989 zur Angleichung der Rechtsvorschriften der Mitgliedstaaten über die elektromagnetische Verträglichkeit

(2006/C 201/02)

(Text von Bedeutung für den EWR)

(Veröffentlichung der Titel und der Bezugsdaten der harmonisierten Normen im Sinne dieser Richtlinie)

Allgemeiner Hinweis: Wenn in Spalte 3 (Hinweis auf die ersetzte Norm) ein Strich (—) steht, dann darf die betroffene Norm nicht ohne die Änderung oder den besonderen Teil für EMV-Zwecke benutzt werden.

Beispiel: Für EN 61037:1992 gilt Folgendes:

Dieses Verzeichnis ersetzt alle früheren, im Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union veröffentlichten Verzeichnisse.

----

(1)

----
No. 51639.

#### Protest 47356-K of Walter J. Johnson & Co. (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on the entry. The protest was sustained to this extent.
No. 51962.

#### Dayton Company et al. *v.*United States,

protests 71617-K, etc. (Minneapolis, etc.).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           3,825
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          12,316
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 1,062
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          58,490
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            58,153
<LOANS>                                        202,339
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,230
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 286,667
<DEPOSITS>                                     231,493
<SHORT-TERM>                                     3,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              2,312
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            61
<OTHER-SE>                                      45,925
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 286,667
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 10,853
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,067
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                 1,129
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                14,385
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               7,229
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,247
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            7,138
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      289
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  5,504
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,739
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,739
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,058
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .18
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.08
<LOANS-NON>                                        837
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,034
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      123
<RECOVERIES>                                        30
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,230
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,230
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
Part 1 Fiscal Year 2016 Reporting

SUPPLEMENT Section II

PROPOSED CHANGES TO CURRENT USSGL ACCOUNTS FOR FISCAL 2016:

Account Title: Receipts Unavailable for Obligation Upon Collection

Account Number: 439400

Normal Balance: Credit

Definition: The amount of receipts that, immediately upon collection, is are not available

for obligation. These receipts, or a portion thereof, may be available for investment before

becoming available for obligation. For example, the authorizing legislation may specify a 

portion of the receipts is are not available for obligation, while the entire amount remainder 

of the receipts is only available for investment. until a specified time in the future. These

receipts, or a portion thereof, may be available for investment before becoming available for 

obligation. This USSGL account will offset the budgetary resource appropriation lines on the 

SF 133: Report on Budget Execution and Budgetary Resources/Budget Program and 

Financing Schedule, for a net-zero effect. This USSGL account also will crosswalk to column 

11 of the Bureau of the Fiscal Service 2108: Yearend Closing Statement, to support the

balances of the fund balance with the U.S. Department of the Treasury and/or investments.

This account does not close at yearend.

Justification: To remove FMS 2108 since it is no longer a statement, remove SF 133 

references that are not needed, and to make definition more accurate.

PROPOSED TECHNICAL CHANGES TO THE USSGL ACCOUNTS (Does Not Require 

A Vote)

Account Title: Central Accounting Control Account 

Account Number: 199900 

Normal Balance: Debit 

Definition: This is a control account to reconcile activity related to the Statement of 

Transactions and Accountability (FMS 224, FMS 1219/1220, and FMS 1218/1221), Authority 

Transaction Module, and daily transcript reporting. This account is for the General Fund of the 

Treasury use only. This account does not close at yearend. 

Justification: To remove FMS references.

 1 7/21/2016 IRC Handout
Account Title: Adjustments to Indefinite Appropriations

Account Number: 439100

Normal Balance: Credit

Definition: The amount necessary to reconcile obligations with resources for indefinite

appropriations derived from the General Fund of the Treasury. that is reportable on the 

Bureau of the Fiscal Service 2108: Yearend Closing Statement. Although the normal balance

for this account is credit, it is acceptable in certain instances for this account to have a debit

balance.

Justification: To remove 2108, since it is no longer a statement.

 2 7/21/2016 IRC Handout
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Belk, Inc. (the
"Corporation") for the quarter ended April 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the
Corporation, certifies that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation.

/s/ Thomas M. Belk, Jr.
-------------------------------------------------
Thomas M. Belk, Jr.
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
June 9, 2005
# Bulletin No. 2018-05

&"Arial,Bold"&12U.S. Standard General LedgerSummary of Changes	

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2018-05	&"Arial,Bold"DRAFT &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handouts April 26, 2018

# Additional Information

&"Arial,Bold"&12U.S. Standard General LedgerSummary of Changes	

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2018-05	&"Arial,Bold" DRAFT &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handouts April 26, 2018
Exhibit 10.4


EXHIBIT "E"


Project Development Plan

 

 


The Optionor, AMS Development, LLC, shall provide the engineering, consulting and administration services necessary to develop the subject property in the following manner:

 


•

Surface coal mining operations will be conducted to recover the mineable and merchantable reserves.


•

Where practicable, auger and/or highwall mining operations will be conducted to enhance recovery.


•

The mining and reclamation plan will be structured to provide for and enhance long term organic farming, with particular attention directed to cattle farming. Examples of enhancement techniques include seeding mixtures, permanent pond construction, access road construction and regrading slopes to leave a gentle contour to the extent practical.


•

Economic balance will be one of the primary concerns for mine and reclamation planning.


•

A primary consideration for the coal mine recovery plan for the subject property will be to maximize the area available for cattle farming at any given time during the mining operation, to the extent practical.

 


The Optionor shall prepare and submit or cause to be prepared and submitted the documents required by regulatory agencies responsible for coal mining and reclamation with jurisdiction for the subject property. Such documents include, but are not necessarily limited to the following:

 


•

Surface coal mining permits applications, including mining and reclamation operation plans.


•

Mine license applications.


•

Applicable Division of Water permit applications.


•

Applicable permit applications required by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.


•

Mining plans required by the Mine Safety and Health Administration (federal).

 


The project development plan includes the goal of commencing mining within six months of the signing of the Agreement to Assign.