alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIGUEL ANGEL DIAZ :

:

Petitioner : C.A. NO.: 02-CV-4454

:

v. :

:

JOHN ASHCROFT; EDWARD MCELROY;:

KENNETH ELWOOD; and INS :

:

Respondents :

WITHDRAWAL OF APPEARANCE

Kindly withdraw my appearance on behalf of the

Respondents in the above-captioned matter.

 

STEPHEN J. BRITT

Assistant United States Attorney

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

Kindly enter my appearance on behalf of the Respondents

in the above-captioned matter. 

 

K.T. TOMLINSON

Assistant United States Attorney 

615 Chestnut Street, Suite 1250 

Philadelphia, PA 19106

Tel:(215) 861-8329

Fax: (215)861-8349

Dated: September 9, 2003

Case 2:02-cv-04454-JCJ Document 12 Filed 09/09/2003 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this date I caused a true and

correct copy of the foregoing Withdrawal/Entry of Appearance to

be served by first-class United States mail, postage prepaid,

upon the following: 

Jorge Guttlein, Esquire

Aranda & Guttlein

291 Broadway

Suite 1500

New York, NY 10007

 

K.T. TOMLINSON

Assistant United States Attorney

Dated: September 9, 2003

Case 2:02-cv-04454-JCJ Document 12 Filed 09/09/2003 Page 2 of 2
Before the Third Division,

April 9, 1947

No. 51656.

#### Protest 625845-G of Fujii Junichi Shoten, Ltd. (Honolulu).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the bean flour is similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Togasaki*v. *United States*(23 C. C. P. A. 342, T. D. 48197). In accordance therewith the claim at 35 percent under paragraph 775 was sustained.
**Discussion on “N” domain value for USSGL account 660000 and 661000**

Section IV attribute table

Bulletin No. 2017-01                                                        1                                               IRC Handout 12/08/16

# image1.png

# image2.png

# image3.png
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification of Nevada Classic Thoroughbreds, Inc.  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  regarding Annual Report on Form 10-KSB  for the year ended June 30, 2009**

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title  18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Nevada Classic  Thoroughbreds, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), doeshereby certify that, based upon his knowledge:

1. The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended    June 30, 2009 (the "Form 10-KSB") fully complies with the    requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. Information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of  the Company.

> 
 

| Dated: October 12, 2009 | By: /s/ Brad Brimhall   |
|-------------------------|-------------------------|
|                    |                         |
|                    | Brad Brimhall           |
|                    | Chief Executive Officer |

>
# Sheet1

Part 1SUPPLEMENT	DRAFT	Fiscal Year 2016 ReportingSection IV

Bulletin No. 2017-01	VI AT - &P	DRAFT IRC Handout 12-8-16
No. P68/260.

protests 66/6688, etc. (New York).

#### Globe Importing Company et al. *v.*United States,

Beckworth, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” covered by the foregoing protests consist of sink strainers in chief value of brass the same in all material respects as those the subject of Davies, *Turner & Company*v. *United States*(55 Cust. Ct. 488, Abstract 69651) and that the items marked “B” consist of sink strainers in chief value of steel similar in all material respects, except material, to those the subject of Abstract 69651, supra, the claims of the plaintiffs were sustained.
Exhibit 21

SUBSIDIARY LIST



|                                                                |  |                       
|--------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------
|NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                                              |  | STATE OF INCORPORATION
|Erie Navigation Company                                         |  | Pennsylvania          
|Erie Sand and Gravel Company                                    |  | Pennsylvania          
|Erie Steamship Company                                          |  | Delaware              
|Oglebay Norton Engineered Materials, Inc.                       |  | Ohio                  
|Oglebay Norton Industrial Sands, Inc.                           |  | California            
|Oglebay Norton Management Company                               |  | Ohio                  
|Oglebay Norton Marine Management Company, L.L.C.                |  | Delaware              
|Oglebay Norton Marine Services Company, L.L.C.                  |  | Delaware              
|Oglebay Norton Minerals, Inc.                                   |  | Delaware              
|Oglebay Norton Specialty Minerals, Inc.                         |  | Ohio                  
|ON Coast Petroleum Company                                      |  | Texas                 
|ON Marine Services Company                                      |  | Delaware              
|O-N Minerals (Chemstone) Company                                |  | Delaware              
|O-N Minerals (Erie) Company                                     |  | Pennsylvania          
|O-N Minerals (Filler Products) Company                          |  | Delaware              
|O-N Minerals (Georgia) Company                                  |  | Georgia               
|O-N Minerals (GSPC) Company                                     |  | Delaware              
|O-N Minerals (James River) Company                              |  | Delaware              
|O-N Minerals (Lime) Company                                     |  | Georgia               
|O-N Minerals (Luttrell) Company                                 |  | Delaware              
|O-N Minerals (Michigan) Company                                 |  | Michigan              
|O-N Minerals (PenRoc) Company LP                                |  | Pennsylvania          
|O-N Minerals (Portage) Company LLC                              |  | Indiana               
|O-N Minerals (Terminals) Company d/b/a/ Cleveland Bulk Terminal |  | Ohio                  
|O-N Minerals Company                                            |  | Ohio                  
|ONCO Investment Company                                         |  | Delaware              
|ONCO WVA, Inc.                                                  |  | West Virginia         
|ONMS Management Company, LLC                                    |  | Delaware              
|ONTEX, Inc.                                                     |  | Delaware              
|Saginaw Mining Company                                          |  | Ohio                  
|Texas Mining, LP                                                |  | Delaware
Order issued October 11 , 2018 withdrawn; Replaced by this Order filed

November 29 , 2018

.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 18

- 00318

- CV

___________ LONE STAR PAVERS INC

. , Appellant

V.

JOSE MURILLO , Appellee

On Appeal from the 151st District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 321010151

O R D E R

On October 11 , 2018 this court issued an order in error. That order is withdrawn. This order is filed in its place.

No reporter’s record has been filed in thi s case. The official court reporter

for the 151st District Court informed this court that appellant had not made arrangements for payment for the reporter’s record. On September 6

, 2018 the clerk of this court notified appellant that we would consider an d decide those

issue s that do not require a reporter’s record unless appellant, within 15 days ofnotice, provided this court with proof of payment for the record. See T ex. R. App

.

P. 37.3(c). Appellant filed no reply.

Accordingly, we order appellant to file a brief in this appeal by D ecember 13, 2018 . If appellant fails to comply with this order, the court will dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).

PER CURIAM
No. 07-14-00382-CR

Brunita Lilly Frausto

Appellant

v.

The State of Texas

Appellee §

§

§

§ From the 64th District Court of

Hale County

December 23, 2014

Opinion by Justice Hancock

J U D G M E N T

Pursuant to the opinion of the Court dated December 23, 2014, it is ordered,

adjudged and decreed that this appeal is dismissed.

Inasmuch as this is an appeal in forma pauperis

, no costs beyond those that

have been paid are adjudged.

It is further ordered, adjudged and decreed that inasmuch as the appeal is

dismissed at the appellant’s request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and

our mandate will issue forthwith.

It is further ordered that this decision be certified below for observance.

o O o
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

GRACE LAWRENCE 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

TRANS UNION LLC 

CITY OF PHILADELPHIA 

Defendant. 

C.A. NO: 02-CV-4440 

TRANS UNION LLC’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

 Trans Union LLC (“Trans Union”), by and through its undersigned attorneys, moves this 

Court, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56, for summary judgment. Trans Union is 

entitled to summary judgment because there is no issue of material fact and Trans Union is 

entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The reasons and authorities for this motion are set forth 

more fully in the attached Memorandum of Law in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment 

and Exhibits thereto; the Deposition of Grace Lawrence; the Deposition of Eileen Little; and the 

Deposition of William Stockdale. 

 Respectfully Submitted, 

 _______________________________ 

 BRUCE S. LUCKMAN (38636) 

 TIMOTHY P. CREECH (81728) 

 SATZBERG, TRICHON 

 KOGAN & WERTHEIMER, P.C. 

 1818 Market St., 30th Floor 

 Philadelphia, PA 19103 

 (215) 575-7600; Fax: (215) 575-7688 

 bluckman@mstkw.com; tcreech@mstkw.com

 

 Attorneys for Defendant, Trans Union LLC

DATED: June 16, 2003 

Case 2:02-cv-04440-AB Document 20 Filed 06/16/2003 Page 1 of 1
# attribtable--OUTPUT

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2023-04	&"Arial,Bold"&9Draft	&"Arial,Bold"&10IRC Handout Feb. 15,  2023
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

FITZ GREEN, : CIVIL ACTION

Plaintiff, :

:

v. : NO. 02-4433

:

CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, et al., :

Defendants. :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 26th day of November, 2002, upon consideration of plaintiff’s

unopposed letter request of November 25, 2002, it is hereby ORDERED that plaintiff’s response

to defendant’s motion to dismiss is due on or before December 9, 2002.

BY THE COURT:

 

 RONALD L. BUCKWALTER, J.

Case 2:02-cv-04433-RB Document 15 Filed 11/26/2002 Page 1 of 1
No. 58491.

protest 226415-K (New York).

#### P. John Hanrahan, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

From an examination of the papers in this case, the court was unable to find anything to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the collector’s classification. The protest was therefore overruled.
Exhibit 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
                         THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of IEH Corporation (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the year ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert Knoth, Chief
Financial Officer, Controller and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company,
respectfully certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to
ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

The Report fully complies with the requirements of the section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Dated: July 17. 2006



/s/ Robert Knoth
----------------
Robert Knoth
Chief Financial Officer, Controller and Principal Accounting Officer





                                      -48-
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
                                                                                               EXHIBIT 12
                         INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY
         Computation of Consolidated Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                        (in thousands except ratio data)
<CAPTION>
                                                                     Year Ended December 31,
                                                       1996       1997       1998       1999       2000
<S>                                                  <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>
Fixed Charges:
  Interest on First Mortgage Bonds. . . . . . . .    $ 41,209   $ 39,678   $ 35,910   $ 31,442   $ 24,154
  Interest on Other Long-term Debt. . . . . . . .      20,100     21,064     27,457     38,623     55,977
  Interest on Short-term Debt . . . . . . . . . .       2,982      3,248      4,903      9,207     19,263
  Miscellaneous Interest Charges. . . . . . . . .       3,262      3,187      3,113      6,754     20,356
  Estimated Interest Element in Lease Rentals . .      82,600     79,700     79,300     73,800     74,100
       Total Fixed Charges. . . . . . . . . . . .    $150,153   $146,877   $150,683   $159,826   $193,850

Earnings:
  Net Income (Loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .    $157,153   $146,740   $ 96,628   $ 32,776  $(132,032)
  Plus Federal Income Taxes . . . . . . . . . . .      76,899     74,223     47,210     18,866     (4,524)
  Plus State Income Taxes . . . . . . . . . . . .       9,270      7,519      4,938     (7,352)     9,237
  Plus Fixed Charges (as above) . . . . . . . . .     150,153    146,877    150,683    159,826    193,850
       Total Earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . .    $393,475   $375,359   $299,459   $204,116  $  66,531

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges. . . . . . . .        2.62       2.55       1.98       1.27       0.34
</TABLE>
On September 12, 2013, EPA met with representatives from IKEA regarding the recently proposed 

regulations implementing the Formaldehyde Standards for Composite Wood Products Act. IKEA officials 

reiterated concerns that they submitted in their public comments, including concerns related to the 

labeling and recordkeeping requirements, the sell-by dates, as well as the time frame for 

implementation of the third-party certification program. IKEA suggested that EPA use certain Consumer 

Product Safety Commission labeling requirements as a model, in addition to the labeling requirements 

currently in place in California. IKEA alerted the Agency to new pressed wood product technologies 

currently being developed and suggested that the Agency develop regulations that squarely address 

products made with those new technologies.
# 2014 FACTS II Attribute Table

# Footnotes

# Easy Reference
# March 2015

# April 2015

# May 2015

# June 2015

# July 2015

# August 2015

# September 2015

# October 2015

# November 2015

# December 2015

# January 2016

# February 2016

# March 2016

# April 2016

# May 2016

# June 2016

# July 2016

# August 2016

# September 2016
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 125 Filed 01/24/2005 Page 1 of 5
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 125 Filed 01/24/2005 Page 2 of 5
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 125 Filed 01/24/2005 Page 3 of 5
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 125 Filed 01/24/2005 Page 4 of 5
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 125 Filed 01/24/2005 Page 5 of 5
June 20, 2011 

Mr. Micah Farney 

2754 South 118th East Avenue 

Tulsa, OK 74129 

Dear Mr. Farney: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

§ 65.71(a)(2) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can’t 

process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can’t Process Your Request 

We entered your May 4, 2011, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2011-

0466), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent 

doesn’t comply with the requirements of 14 CFR 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider 

the request any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it 

would benefit the public as a whole. 

 Verification that all other requirements of § 65.71(a)(2) can be met. 

 The reasons why the exemption wouldn’t adversely affect safety or how the 

exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule 

from which you seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. We will consider the docket on your request open until we 

receive this required information from you. Please note that 14 CFR 11.63(d) requires you to 

send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the 

exemption. 
2 

If We Don’t Hear From You 

If we don’t hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda D. Courtney 

Manager, Aircraft and 

 Airports Rules Division

Enclosure
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1532 Referred in House (RFH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1532

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           September 18, 2017

     Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To disqualify from operating a commercial motor vehicle for life an 
 individual who uses a commercial motor vehicle in committing a felony 
                      involving human trafficking.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No Human Trafficking on Our Roads 
Act''.

SEC. 2. LIFETIME DISQUALIFICATION WITHOUT REINSTATEMENT.

    Section 31310(d) of title 49, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in the heading, by striking ``Controlled Substance 
        Violations'' and inserting ``Lifetime Disqualification Without 
        Reinstatement'';
            (2) by striking ``The Secretary'' and inserting ``(1) 
        Controlled substance violations.--The Secretary''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) Human trafficking violations.--The Secretary shall 
        disqualify from operating a commercial motor vehicle for life 
        an individual who uses a commercial motor vehicle in committing 
        a felony involving an act or practice described in paragraph 
        (9) of section 103 of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 
        2000 (22 U.S.C. 7102(9)).''.

            Passed the Senate September 14, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                JULIE E. ADAMS,

                                                             Secretary.
```
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                      5
<CIK>                                          0001051904
<NAME>                                         Frisby Technologies, Inc.

<S>                                            <C>

<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         225,113
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2,600,584
<ALLOWANCES>                                   60,000
<INVENTORY>                                    1,799,064
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               5,165,753
<PP&E>                                         1,473,661
<DEPRECIATION>                                 523,475
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 8,953,258
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          4,371,877
<BONDS>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       5,775
<OTHER-SE>                                     3,058,549
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   8,953,258
<SALES>                                        2,405,980
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               2,463,230
<CGS>                                          1,817,028
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,973,070
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               1,852,472
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             16,496
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,332,534)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            0
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,332,534)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  (.23)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0



</TABLE>
SCWC-13-0000386
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI # I

STATE OF HAWAI # I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs. MICHAEL SHIMABUKURO, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-13-0000386; CR. NO. 11-1-1686)
ORDER REJECTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Reck tenwald, C.J., Nak ayama, an d Wilson, JJ., Circuit J udge Ochi ai, in pl ace of Mc Kenna, J. , recused , and Circuit J udge Crab tree, in place of Pollack, J., recus ed.) Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Michael Shimabukuro’s application for writ of certiorari filed on February 16, 2016 is hereby rejected.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai # i, March 31, 2016. John M. Tonaki and William H. Jameson, Jr. for petitioner Keith M. Kaneshiro Sonja P. McCullen for respondent /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald /s/ Paula A. Nakayama /s/ Michael D. Wilson /s/ Dean E. Ochiai /s/ Jeffrey P. Crabtree Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-13-0000386 31-MAR-2016 12:32 PM
Case 2:05-mc-00164-HB Document 11 Filed 05/06/08 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:05-mc-00164-HB Document 11 Filed 05/06/08 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:05-mc-00164-HB Document 11 Filed 05/06/08 Page 3 of 3
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 1SUPPLEMENT &"Arial,Regular"	&"Arial,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2020 ReportingSection VII  

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2021-07	&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000DRAFT &K000000VII VDR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout 12/3/20