alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 4.22


Table of Contents

 Exhibit 4.22 

 [THE COCA-COLA COMPANY LETTERHEAD] 

December 20, 2007 

Embotelladora Hit de Venezuela S.A. de C.V. 

 Dear Sirs: 

 In regards to the Bottler Agreement in force and effect since August 16, 1996 (“the Agreement”) entered into between you and The Coca-Cola Company (the “Company”), we inform you that a new bottler agreement is in the final stages
  of discussion and approval among the parties, which we estimate will be executed towards the middle of March 2008, hereby the Agreement is temporarily extended from December 31, 2007 until:

 March 31, 2008 

 With the exception of said extension, all the terms and conditions of the Agreement will continue to be fully valid until the expiration of said additional term, and once the extension expires, the Bottler will no longer have the right to claim a
  tacit renewal of the aforementioned Agreement.

 

		
	 	 Sincerely,
	 	 
	 	 THE COCA-COLA COMPANY 
	 	 
	 	 
	 	/s/ 
	 	 
	 	Authorized Representative 








		
	Accepted by: 	 
	EMBOTELLADORA HIT DE VENEZUELA S.A. DE C.V. 	 
	 	 
	 	 
	/s/ 	 
	 	 
	Authorized Representative
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1433 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1433

To approve the 2010 Compact Review Agreement with Palau, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 26, 2017

 Ms. Hirono (for herself, Ms. Murkowski, and Ms. Cantwell) introduced 
the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 
                    on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To approve the 2010 Compact Review Agreement with Palau, and for other 
                               purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AGREEMENT SUPPLEMENTAL TO COMPACT OF FREE ASSOCIATION WITH 
              PALAU.

    (a) Approval of Agreement Supplemental to Compact.--The Compact 
Review Agreement and appendices signed by the United States and the 
Republic of Palau on September 3, 2010, in connection with section 432 
of the Compact of Free Association with Palau (Public Law 99-658; 48 
U.S.C. 1931 note), with the funding schedule therein to be modified by 
the parties to the Agreement as necessary and appropriate, are approved 
(hereinafter the ``Agreement'').
    (b) Status of Prior Year Payments.--Amounts provided to the 
Government of Palau by the Government of the United States in fiscal 
years 2011 through 2017 shall also be considered as funding to 
implement the Agreement.
    (c) Extension of Effective Date.--Section 105(f)(1)(B)(ix) of the 
Compact of Free Association Amendments Act of 2003 (48 U.S.C. 
1921d(f)(1)(B)(ix)) is amended by striking ``2009'' and inserting 
``2024''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

KEVIN MITCHELL : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. :

EQUIFAX CREDIT INFORMATION :

SERVICES, et al. : NO. 02-3812

________________________________________________________________________

KEVIN MITCHELL : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. :

:

TRANS UNION LLC, et. al. : NO. 02-4439

________________________________________________________________________

KEVIN MITCHELL : CIVIL ACTION

 :

v. :

:

EXPERIAN INFORMATION : NO. 02-4442

SOLUTIONS, INC., et al. :

______________________________________________________________________________

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of March, 2003, IT IS ORDERED that the

above-captioned cases are consolidated for all pre-trial purposes. Discovery in these matters shall

be completed by July 15, 2003. 

____________________________________

John P. Fullam, S.J.

Case 2:02-cv-04442-JF Document 22 Filed 03/12/2003 Page 1 of 1
**United States Government Standard General LedgerPosition/Policy Statement**

**RESCISSIONS/OTHER UNAVAILABLE AUTHORITYPRIVATE**

1a.*To record current year rescission:*

4450  Unapportioned Authority - Available

4392  Rescissions - Current-Year

(Data elements needed for 4392 to distinquish between type of resource). 

1b.*To close 4392 current year rescission:*

4392  Rescissions - Current-Year

4201  Total Actual Resources - Collected

2.*To anticipate a rescission:*

4450  Unapportioned Authoirty - Available

4420  Unapportioned Authority - Pending Rescission

3a.*To record a rescission which had previously been anticipated:*

4420 Unapportioned Authority - Pending Rescission

4392  Rescissions - Current-Year 

**or**

**4393  Rescissions - Prior-Year**

3b.*To record a rescission which had not previously been anticipated:*

4450  Unapportioned Authority - Available

4392  Rescissions - Current-Year

**or**

**4393  Rescissions - Prior-Year**

4.*To close 4420 Unapportioned Authority - Pending Rescission when the rescission was not enacted into law:*

4420  Unapportioned Authority - Pending Rescission

4650  Allotments - Expired Authority (expired funds)

4450  Unapportioned Authority Available (unexpired funds)

5.*To close 4392 or **4393** Rescissions:*

4392  Rescissions - Current-Year

**or**

**4393  Rescissions - Prior-Year**

4119  Other Appropriations Realized

6.*To realize authority made unavailable pursuant to public law:*

4450  Unapportioned Authority - Available

4395  Authority Unavailable Pursuant to Public Law (Temp)

**or**

**4396  Authority Permanently Not Available Pursuant to PL**

7.*To close 4395 or **4396** Authority Unavailable Pursuant to PL:*

4395  Authority Unavailable Pursuant to PL (Temp)

**or**

**4396  Authority Permanently Not Available Pursuant to PL**

4119  Other Appropriations Realized

(Assumes authority is permanently unavailable. If it is merely deferred to subsequent years, credit is to 4450, Unapportioned Authority - Available).

**Effective on October 1, 1996Rescissions/Other Unavailable Authority  Page E-1**
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1586 

To require the Under Secretary for Oceans and Atmosphere to update periodically the environmental sensitivity index products of the National Oceanic 

and Atmospheric Administration for each coastal area of the Great 

Lakes, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JULY 19, 2017 

Mr. PETERS (for himself and Mr. YOUNG) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 

Transportation 

A BILL 

To require the Under Secretary for Oceans and Atmosphere 

to update periodically the environmental sensitivity index 

products of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration for each coastal area of the Great Lakes, 

and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1586 IS

1 SECTION 1. UPDATE TO ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY 

2 INDEX PRODUCTS OF NATIONAL OCEANIC 

3 AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION FOR 

4 GREAT LAKES. 

5 (a) UPDATE REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days 

6 after the date of the enactment of this Act and not less 

7 frequently than once every 7 years thereafter, the Under 

8 Secretary for Oceans and Atmosphere shall update the en9 vironmental sensitivity index products of the National 

10 Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration for each coastal 

11 area of the Great Lakes. 

12 (b) ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY INDEX PRODUCT

13 DEFINED.—In this subsection, the term ‘‘environmental 

14 sensitivity index product’’ means a map or similar tool 

15 that is utilized to identify sensitive shoreline, coastal or 

16 offshore, resources prior to an oil spill event in order to 

17 set baseline priorities for protection and plan cleanup 

18 strategies, typically including information relating to 

19 shoreline type, biological resources, and human use re20 sources. 

21 (c) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.— 

22 (1) IN GENERAL.—There is authorized to be 

23 appropriated to the Under Secretary $7,500,000 to 

24 carry out this section. 

25 (2) AVAILABILITY.—Amounts appropriated or 

26 otherwise made available pursuant to paragraph (1) 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1586 IS

1 shall be available to the Under Secretary for the 

2 purposes set forth in such paragraph until expended. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
Before the Second Division,

October 16, 1947

No. 51957.

#### Porteous, Mitchell & Braun Co. *v.*United States,

petition 6585-R (Portland, Maine).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

A submission sheet prepared by the customs broker, requesting the appraiser for latest information as to the value of the importation in question, was introduced in evidence as exhibit 1. Appearing thereon over the signature of the appraiser is the statement: “This office has no information.” At the hearing the buyer and manager of the shoe department of petitioner testified that he placed the order for the importation the latter part of October 1945; that in July 1946, when the shoes arrived in this country, he had no information that the manufacturer had increased his prices on this type of shoe; and that he knew exhibit 1 had been submitted to the appraiser’s office about the time of entry. The appraiser of merchandise testified that prior to entry of this importation petitioner’s exhibit 1 was submitted to him by the customs broker; that at the time of entry he had no information as to the final appraised value and so reported; and that his opinion as to petitioner’s reputation for fair dealings is that there is “None better.” From an examination of the record and consideration of all the facts involved, the court was satisfied as to the good faith of the petitioner and found that there was no intention to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the case or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore granted.
No. 59500.

protest 214703-K (Boston).

#### Federated Dept. Stores, Inc. *v.*United States,

*322Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of traveling irons similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Greatrex, Limited,*and *J. J. Gavin & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 79, C. D. 1639), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Filed by Bowne Pure Compliance





Exhibit 10.60



ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION

OF EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




THIS ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Assignment”), effective the 23rd
day of June 2008, is made by and between MiMedx, Inc, a Florida corporation (“Assignor”), and
MiMedx Group, Inc., a Florida corporation (“Assignee”).



WHEREAS, Assignor, as the “Company” under that certain employment agreement by and between
Assignor and Matthew J. Miller (as “Executive”), entered into that certain employment agreement
dated March 1, 2007, as amended September 25, 2007 (the “Employment Agreement); and



WHEREAS, due to certain recent corporate transactions, including Assignor’s merger with
Assignee, a public company, the parties believe it is in their best interests to assign the
Employment Agreement to Assignee, so that Executive will become employed by Assignee for purposes
of completing the terms of the Employment Agreement.



NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are
hereby acknowledged, Assignor and Assignee agree as follows:



1. Assignment. Assignor hereby assigns and delivers all of its rights, duties and
obligations under the Employment Agreement to Assignee effective on the date and year first written
above.



2. Assumption of Duties. Assignee hereby assumes and agrees to pay, discharge, or
perform, as appropriate, all of Assignor’s obligations under the Employment Agreement arising after
the date hereof. If any of those obligations was discovered after the date hereof, but were, in
actuality, incurred prior to the date hereof, those obligations shall be paid, discharged or
performed, as appropriate, by Assignor.



[SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]




 


 









 







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Assignment as of the date and year written
below.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	ASSIGNOR:



MIMEDX, INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/  John C. Thomas, Jr.
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	John C. Thomas, Jr. 	 
	 	 	Title:  	Secretary 	 
	 



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	ASSIGNEE:



MIMEDX GROUP, INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/  John C. Thomas, Jr.
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	John C. Thomas, Jr. 	 
	 	 	Title:  	Secretary 	 
	 




MATTHEW J. MILLER (“Executive” under the Employment Agreement) joins herein to indicate his consent
to the assignment and assumption of the Employment Agreement, agrees to look solely to Assignee for
performance of all obligations of Assignor arising under the Employment Agreement after the date of
this Assignment, agrees that the Employment Agreement remains in full force and effect, and agrees
to continue to be fully bound by its terms.



	 	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Matthew J. Miller	 	 
	 	 	 
	MATTHEW J. MILLER	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Date:

	 	6/23/08
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

: CIVIL ACTION NOS.

:

HAMMOND, et al. : 02-4409

GRESH, et al. : 02-4410

GEARINGER, SR. : 02-4411

BRASSILL : 02-4413

FYE : 02-4414

SEARFOSS : 02-4415

SMITH, et al. : 02-4416

MEYER, et al. : 02-4480

BINDER, et al. : 02-4658

BOULOUS : 02-4659

NEES, SR., et al. : 02-4730

WHELAN, et al. : 02-5164

MENTZER : 02-5165

MCELHINEY, et al. : 02-5317

DELGAUDIO, et al. : 02-5318

WAGNER, et al. : 02-5319

:

V. :

:

DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION :

et al. : :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of August, 2002, it is hereby

ORDERED that the above-captioned case or cases are referred to the Honorable

Charles R. Weiner for the purposes of the monitoring and the coordination of the status of

discovery, scheduling of arbitration hearings (if appropriate), settlement negotiations (if

appropriate), and scheduling trial dates (if appropriate), and it is further

ORDERED that the above-captioned case(s) shall remain on the calendar(s) of the

judge(s) to whom they were assigned at the time of filing, until further order of this court,

and, it is further 

Case 2:02-cv-04413-MK Document 6 Filed 08/13/2002 Page 1 of 2
-2-

ORDERED that counsel for defendant(s) who filed a petition for removal of the

above-captioned case(s) to this court shall serve a copy of this Order on counsel for

plaintiff(s) in the above-captioned case(s), and, it is further

ORDERED that the relevant Prothonotaries of the Courts of Common Pleas

located within the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Eastern District 

of Pennsylvania that the above-captioned case or cases have been removed from shall

retain the original records in these matters, pending further Order of this court.

 

JAMES T. GILES, Ch.J.

Case 2:02-cv-04413-MK Document 6 Filed 08/13/2002 Page 2 of 2
No. 49598.

#### Protest 987564-G of Richard C. Wolfe (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

The exhibit is a round tank, about 4 inches in diameter and 3)4 inches high, having a removable cover, and containing an adjustable reel for films. It developed that beside synthetic resin there is contained in said exhibit 38 percent of wood flour and some dyes and coloring matters. The plaintiff’s witness, an electrical engineer, stated that in his opinion the exhibit was not an article made of a product in which synthetic resin or resinlike substance is the chief binding agent and that the wood flour, dyes, and coloring matter were there partly for the reason that an article made of nothing but synthetic resin would not have resiliency or strength, but would be very brittle, and partly for the reason *255that such article would be translucent, while a daylight developing tank must be opaque. In other words, it was apparently the plaintiff’s view that the synthetic resin in the article at bar is not present as a binding agent but is the chief material of which the article is manufactured, the other ingredients being present to add desirable characteristics (citing *Bates*v. *United States*(T. D. 47189) and *Bolls Razor, Inc.*v. *United States,*6 Cust. Ct. 271, C. D. 480), while the defendant was of the opinion that the wood flour, dyes, and coloring matter would not hold together without the synthetic resin and that if the synthetic resin were removed the exhibit would fall apart. Following *Lee & Schiffer*v. *United States*(12 Cust. Ct. 183, C. D. 850) the protest was overruled.
No. 61269.

protests 300147-K, etc. (New York).

#### B. Westergaard & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

*459Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of sprats in oil, packed in tins, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Arnold Sorensin Co., Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 199, C. D. 1862), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Exhibit 10.1


 


PROMISSORY NOTE


 


	
  $2,500,000

  	
   

  	
  Austin,
  Texas

  



 


June 26, 2008


 


Valence
Technology, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Maker”), hereby promises
to pay to the order of Berg & Berg Enterprises, LLC (“Lender”),
or its successors and assigns, in lawful money of the United States of America,
Two Million Five Hundred Thousand Dollars ($2,500,000), together with accrued
and unpaid interest thereon, August 15, 2008 (the “Maturity Date”).


 


The
unpaid principal amount of this Promissory Note shall bear interest at a rate
per annum equal to 8.0% calculated on the basis of a 365-day year and the actual
number of days elapsed.


 


This
Promissory Note may be prepaid in whole or in part at any time, without premium
or penalty.


 


In
the event that Lender purchases any equity securities of Maker from Maker after
the date of this Promissory Note, all principal and accrued but unpaid interest
then outstanding hereunder may be used by Lender as full or partial, as the
case may be, satisfaction of the purchase price of such equity securities.  In the event that Lender exercises such right
and the entire principal and accrued but unpaid interest then outstanding
hereunder is used to purchase all or a portion of such equity securities, then
all indebtedness and obligations hereunder shall be canceled and extinguished
concurrently therewith.


 


Maker
hereby waives presentment, demand, notice of dishonor, protest, notice of
protest and all other demands, protests and notices in connection with the
execution, delivery, performance, collection and enforcement of this Promissory
Note.  Maker shall pay all costs of
collection when incurred, including reasonable attorneys’ fees, costs and
expenses.


 


This
Promissory Note is being delivered in, is intended to be performed in, shall be
construed and interpreted in accordance with, and be governed by the internal
laws of, the State of Texas, without regard to principles of conflict of laws.


 


This
Promissory Note may only be amended, modified or terminated or any provision
hereof waived by an agreement in writing signed by the party to be
charged.  This Promissory Note shall be
binding upon the successors and assigns of Maker and inure to the benefit of
Lender and its successors, endorsees and assigns.


 


	
   

  	
  VALENCE
  TECHNOLOGY, INC.

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  By:

  	
  /s/
  Galen Fischer

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Name:

  	
  Galen
  Fischer

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
  Title:

  	
  Chief
  Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1536 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1536

 To designate a human trafficking prevention coordinator and to expand 
  the scope of activities authorized under the Federal Motor Carrier 
Safety Administration's outreach and education program to include human 
       trafficking prevention activities, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 12, 2017

 Ms. Klobuchar (for herself, Mr. Thune, and Mr. Nelson) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                 Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To designate a human trafficking prevention coordinator and to expand 
  the scope of activities authorized under the Federal Motor Carrier 
Safety Administration's outreach and education program to include human 
       trafficking prevention activities, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Combating Human Trafficking in 
Commercial Vehicles Act''.

SEC. 2. HUMAN TRAFFICKING PREVENTION COORDINATOR.

    The Secretary of Transportation shall designate an official within 
the Department of Transportation who shall--
            (1) coordinate human trafficking prevention efforts across 
        modal administrations in the Department of Transportation and 
        with other departments and agencies of the Federal Government; 
        and
            (2) in coordinating such efforts, take into account the 
        unique challenges of combating human trafficking within 
        different transportation modes.

SEC. 3. EXPANSION OF OUTREACH AND EDUCATION PROGRAM.

    Section 31110(c)(1) of title 49, United States Code, is amended by 
adding at the end the following: ``The program authorized under this 
subsection may support, in addition to funds otherwise available for 
such purposes, the recognition, prevention, and reporting of human 
trafficking, while deferring to existing resources, as practicable.''.

SEC. 4. EXPANSION OF COMMERCIAL DRIVER'S LICENSE FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE 
              PROGRAM.

    Section 31313(a)(3) of title 49, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (D), by striking ``or'' at the end;
            (2) by redesignating subparagraph (E) as subparagraph (F); 
        and
            (3) by inserting after subparagraph (D) the following:
                    ``(E) support, in addition to funds otherwise 
                available for such purposes, the recognition, 
                prevention, and reporting of human trafficking; or''.
                                 <all>
```
Order filed, December 01, 2016

.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14

- 16

- 00863

- CR

____________

FRANK EDGAR REID , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the Co unty Crim inal C our t at Law No 6

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2017010



### ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due November 14, 2016

. See Tex. R.

App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the

record. The record has not been filed with the court. Bec ause the reporter’s record

has not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Katelyn Harrelson , the official court reporter, to file the record in

this appeal within 30 days of the date of this order

.

PER CURIAM