alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-4.58





Exhibit 4.58


SUPPLEMENTARY AGREEMENT TO

EXCLUSIVE TECHNICAL SERVICE AND

CONSULTANCY AGREEMENT



This supplementary agreement (“Supplementary Agreement”) to the Exclusive Technical Service and
Consultancy Agreement is made on 1 April, 2007 in Shanghai, People’s Republic of China (“PRC”) by
and between:





	(1)	 	Shanghai T2 Entertainment Co., Ltd., located at 12F, 418, Gui Ping Road, Shanghai, with Wang
Chi as the legal representative (hereinafter called “T2E”).
	 
	(2)	 	T2CN Information Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd., located at 12F, 418, Gui Ping Road,
Shanghai, with Deng Ruen-Zeh as the legal representative (hereinafter called “T2CN”)




(T2E and T2CN are hereinafter referred to individually as “Party” and collectively as “Parties”.)



Pursuant to the provisions of the Exclusive Technical Service and Consultancy Agreement made by the
Parties on 15 November, 2006, the Parties hereby enter into this Supplementary Agreement as follows:



The Service Fee that T2E shall pay T2CN on a quarterly basis for Q2, 3 and 4 of 2007 (1 April to 31
December, 2007) under Clause 3.2 (i) of the Exclusive Technical Service and Consultancy Agreement
shall be calculated as follows:




Amount of the Service Fee = 20% of T2E’s Operating Income



This Supplementary Agreement shall prevail in case of any inconsistency with the Exclusive
Technical Service and Consultancy Agreement.




	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Shanghai T2
Entertainment Co., Ltd.	 	 	.	 	 	T2CN Information Technology


(Shanghai) Co., Ltd.	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	Signed by:

	 	/s/ Ji Wang 	 	 	 	 	 	Signed by:	 	/s/ Guo Jun Wei 	 	 
	 

	 	 
	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	 
	 

	 	Name:  Ji Wang	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Name:  Guo Jun Wei	 	 	 	 
	 	 	Title:     Authorised Representative	 	 	 	 	 	 	 	Title:     Authorised Representative
<PAGE>


Exhibit 99.1
------------
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Finity Holdings, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I John A.
Courter, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

*1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

*2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                               /s/John A. Courter
                               ------------------
                                 John A. Courter

*The foregoing certification relates to a registrant which has ceased operations
and has assets as of September 30, 2002 consisting solely of cash in the amount
of $7,546. Accordingly, the registrant has no disclosure controls and procedures
or internal controls and procedures with respect to which conclusions about, or
an evaluation of, effectiveness or significant changes thereof can be disclosed
as required by Item 307of Regulation S-B.






                                       10
Part 2

SUPPLEMENT

DRAFT 

ID

Simple or

Special Name Type Description Error Message 

24 SIMPLE Reporting Type Code SGL Simple

The USSGL Accounts must be valid for the Reporting Type Code.

Invalid USSGL Account/Reporting TypCode combination. Refer to the GTAS attribute table. 

77 SIMPLE Financing Account Code SGL Simple

The USSGL account must be valid for the Financing Account Code assigned to the TAS.

Invalid USSGL Account/Financing AccCode combination. Please refer to the GTAS attribute table. 

84 SPECIAL

Limited Use of USSGL 419000 with Financing Account Code "G" Compound

The use of USSGL account 419000 with Financing Account Code "G" is limited to specific TAS.

Invalid use of USSGL account 419000 Financing Account Code "G". 

U.S. Standard General Ledger

Data Validations - Summary

Draft Bulletin No. 2017-04 VII VSR - 1
# 0 WxT* . 

# 5^p 9 

# < r e

Ada k Communit yDevelopmen t Corporatio n

P . O . Bo x194 3 Adak , Alask

a 9954 6 Marc h 22,201 0 Th e Honorabl e Ra

yLaHoo d Secretar y U . S . Departmen t o fTransportatio n 120 0 NewJerseyAvenue , S E Washington , D

C 2059 0 Ref : Essentia l Ai rService fo rAdak , Alask a DOT-OST-2000-855 6 i ' Dea rMr . Secretary : Ada k Communit yDevelopmen t Corporatio n (ACDC) , a n Ada k non-profi t fisherman' s organizatio n tha t i s a n owne ro f quot a share s o fWester n Aleutia n Gol d Kin g Crab , join s th e Ada k Communit yi n it s stron g unanimou s support o fAlask a Airline s continuin g it s qualit yai rservic e t o Ada k a s provide d sinc e 2003 . ACDC , a s owne ro fquot a share s o fth e above-mentione d golde n kin g crab , ha s bee n discussin g plan s wit h th e carrie rfo rth e shipmen t o fliv e cra b t o point s beyon d Anchorage , tha t coul d conceivabl ybegi n a s earl ya s i n th e comin g year , base d o n th e curren t servic e provide d b yth e carrier , usin g it s Boein g 737 - 40 0 Combinatio n Cargo/passenge rjets . Whil e thi s pla n ha s ye t t o b e furthe rworke d ou t an d finalized , bot h partie s agre e tha t suc h shipmen t o fliv e cra b i s do-able , an d a grea t investmen t opportunit yfo r Adak . ACD

C i n it s lon g ter m plannin g i s als o examinin g othe ropportunitie s fo rth e shipmen t o fothe r liv e o rfresh/fresh-froze n fis h product s fro m Adak , give n th e curren t combinatio n passenger/carg o servic e tha t i s provide d byAlask a Airlines . Ada k ha s experience d man ysetback s alon g it s roa d toward s economi cdevelopment , an d i t trul ycanno t affor d to o man ymor e setbacks . You rsupport o fAda k maintainin g th e servic e i t currentl yenjoy s wit h Alask a Airline s wil l have greatl yhelpe d toward s th e developmen t o fAda k a s a majo reconomi chu b fo r th e Wester n Aleutian s - an d a majo rcrossroa d o fth e continent s tha t i t wa s mean t t o be . Sincerely , Michae l E . Swetzo f Presiden t ms/a k
No. 56977.

#### Corydon & Ohlrich, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 157146-K/2590 (Chicago).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of cheese knives similar in all material respects to those the subject of *B. Westergaard & Co.*v. *United States*(26 Cust. Ct. 77, C. D. 1302), except that the merchandise in question has handles of nickel silver and that said knives are less than 4 inches in length, exclusive of the handle, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

CHRISTOPHER MURRAY, : CIVIL ACTION

Petitioner, :

: NO. 05-414

v. :

:

JAMES GRACE, et al., :

Respondents. :

MEMORANDUM

BUCKWALTER, S.J. October 5, 2005

Petitioner has filed objections to Magistrate Judge Arnold C. Rapoport’s Report

and Recommendation, by which he essentially is repeating the arguments made in his brief in

support of his petition.

What he also states is that he agrees with the Magistrate Judge that he raised only

one of his claims at the state level (see p. 4 of his objections). But, he goes on to state that he

will show cause and prejudice. Based upon the discussion from pages 4 through page 7 of his

objections, it is clear that he does not show any cause for his default, much less prejudice. His

reference to page 20 of his memorandum of law in support of his alleged cause for default does

not establish that such cause existed to entitle him to relief.

An order follows.

Case 2:05-cv-00414-RB Document 19 Filed 10/05/05 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

CHRISTOPHER MURRAY, : CIVIL ACTION

Petitioner, :

: NO. 05-414

v. :

:

JAMES GRACE, et al., :

Respondents. :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 5th day of October, 2005, upon careful and independent

consideration of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, and the Response thereto, and after

review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Arnold C.

Rapoport, and the objections of Petitioner thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED with prejudice and

DISMISSED without an evidentiary hearing.

3. No certificate of appealability will issue based on the Report and

Recommendation which reflects Petitioner’s failure to make a substantial showing of the denial

of any constitutional right.

4. The Clerk of Court shall mark this matter as CLOSED for statistical

purposes.

BY THE COURT:

_____________________________________

 RONALD L. BUCKWALTER, S.J.

Case 2:05-cv-00414-RB Document 19 Filed 10/05/05 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

   Schedule of Year-To-Date Principal and Interest Distributions
                           to
                  Certificateholders
                                                                              Ending
Class                   Interest             Principal      Losses           Balance
<S>                     <C>                  <C>            <C>              <C>
A1                    23,314,416.10      61,093,093.31         0.00      2,210,440,974.72
A2                     8,374,744.14      20,073,854.42         0.00        737,104,145.58
B                              0.00               0.00         0.00        422,502,184.79
R                     14,367,074.30               0.00         0.00                  0.00


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350



Solely for the purposes of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, we, the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of Total Logistics, Inc. (the Company), hereby
certify, based on our knowledge, that the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
that information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   
|-------------------
|/s/ William Donovan
|William T. Donovan 
|May 10, 2004       





|              
|--------------
|/s/ John Buono
|John Buono    
|May 10, 2004
#### In re PARAMOUNT JEWELRY CO., Inc.

United States District Court S. D. New York.

June 17, 1948.

*376John F. X. McGohey, U. S. Atty., of New York City (Henry L. Glenn, Asst. U. S. Atty., of New York City, of counsel), for the United States.

Aranow, Brodsky, Einhorn & Dann, of New York City (Samuel Brodsky, of New York City, of counsel), for Paramount Jewelry Co., Inc.

COXE, District Judge.

This is an application for an order vacating an order of this court directing Edward Stein, the President of Paramount Jewelry Co., Inc., to appear before a Special Agent of the Bureau of Internal Revenue and give testimony with reference to the income tax liability of the company for the two fiscal years ending June 30, 1942, and June 30, 1943, and the period ending December 31, 1943, and to produce its books and records for such periods.

The order sought to be vacated was issued under Section 3633(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S’.C.A., to compel compliance with a summons, which had been issued under the authority of Section 3614(a), and with which Stein had refused to comply.

The order is sought to be vacated on the grounds that (1) Section 3631 prohibits unnecessary examinations and more than one inspection for each taxable year, unless the Commissioner notifies the taxpayer in writing that an additional inspection is ■necessary, and (2) any assessment of taxes for the two fiscal years is barred by the Statute of Limitations.

 The affidavits of the Internal Revenue Agents sufficiently show the probable concealment of income, and, as they assert that their investigation and audit has not been completed, its continuance should not be halted by the court, even though they have examined the taxpayer’s books three or four times during the past two years. The existence of fraud bars any application of the Statute of Limitations. 26 U.S.C.A. § 276(a); United States v. United Distillers Products Corp., 2 Cir., 156 F.2d 872, 873, 874.

Section 3631, however, provides that only one inspection of a taxpayer’s books shall be made for each taxable year unless the Commissioner shall notify the taxpayer in writing that an additional inspection is necessary. No such notice has been given here. If the taxpayer insists upon receiving such a notice, the motion will be granted, but with permission to serve such a notice and thereafter to issue another summons. Otherwise the motion is denied.
Sue Yi, PhD Senior Toxicologist Syngenta Crop Protection on Behalf of the Endocrine Policy Forum May 21

- 23, 2013 SAP 

# Review of Steroidogenesis and Aromatase Assay Methodology and Performance2 

## Overview
● Cytotoxicity issues 

## ● Issue with solubility of test compound at high concentrations 

## ● Suitability of the assays3 

## Steroidogenesis Assay ● P erformance criteria

- Variability in cell behavior (i.e. hormone production)

- In many cases had to repeat assays to meet acceptable performance criteria

- Decreases the usefulness of this assay

– not rapid nor cost effective but more importantly decreases the confidence of the data 

## ● 48 hr treatment period

- Arbitrary time point

- Assumption that increase/decrease in estradiol and/or testosterone will be sustained 

## ● LC/MS/MS is the gold standard for measuring estradiol and testosterone

- RIA is the second analysis method of choice

- ELISA/EIA is not as reliable4 

## Steroidogenesis Assay
● Immunoassay approach

- High variability among different assay kits

- Antibody based assays are also plagued with non

- specific binding, cross

- reactivity, matrix interference

– particularly at low levels of estradiol and /or testosterone

- To increase the confidence , estradiol and/or testosterone should be separated by chromatography (e.g. HPLC) prior to ELSIA/EIA analysis

- References:

- http://www.endo
society.org/media/press/2007/EndocrinePositionStatementCalls StandardizedTestosteroneAssays.cfm

- G uo et. al. 2008.5 

## Steroidogenesis Assay ●6 

## General Comments on Aromatase Assay
● Assessment of only the inhibition of aromatase 

## ● Measure of tritiated water

– rather than estradiol production

- Non

- specific effects at high concentration 

## ● Solubility 

## ● Inhibition of aromatase can be assessed in the steroidogenic assay or other cell

- based assays which can also detect induction 

## ● Solvent 

## ● Test

- tube based

– labor intensive

- Can be miniaturized dramatically in multi

- well format (24

- 96 well)7 

## Aromatase Assay
● Single recombinant variant of CYP19

- High level of variation in CYP19 and thus, the resulting aromatase activity

- Does not address individual and population variance 

## ● Enzyme denaturation leading to false positive 

## ● Lack of xenobiotic metabolizing capacity 

## ● Longevity of activity of the enzyme preparation?

- Protein concentration assessment rather than specific activity assessment 

## ● Tritiated water as the measured endpoint

- No measure of estradiol which is the steroid hormone of interest8 

## Wrap - up
● Cytotoxicity issues

- Confounds the interpretation of the data

- Can cause increased production of estradiol



## ● Solubility of test compound at high concentrations

- Solvent use to go beyond limit of solubility



## ● Necessity of the assays

- Steroidogenesis assay can be used to detect aromatase activity
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

M. DIANE KOKEN, : 

Insurance Commissioner of the Commonwealth : CIVIL ACTION

of Pennsylvania, in Her Official Capacity :

as Liquidator of Reliance Insurance Company, : NO. 05-3049

:

Plaintiff, :

:

 v. :

 :

MIZUHO CORP. BANK, LTD, :

:

Defendant. :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 30 day of June, 2009, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff’s th

Motion to Remand to the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania (Doc. No. 3) is DENIED for the

reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum.

BY THE COURT:

 S/ C. Darnell Jones II 

 J.

Case 2:05-cv-03049-CDJ Document 10 Filed 07/01/09 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 35 (Thursday, February 22, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Page 8029]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-2919]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice (07-010)]


Government-Owned Inventions, Available for Licensing

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of availability of inventions for licensing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The inventions listed below assigned to the National 
Aeronautics and Space Administration, have been filed in the United 
States Patent and Trademark Office, and are available for licensing.

DATES: February 22, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kent N. Stone, Patent Counsel, Glenn 
Research Center at Lewis Field, Code 500-118, Cleveland, OH 44135; 
telephone (216) 433-8855; fax (216) 433-6790.

    NASA Case No. LEW-17642-4: Energetic Atomic and Ionic Oxygen 
Textured Optical Surfaces for Blood Glucose Monitoring;
    NASA Case No. LEW-17975-1: Protective Coating and Hyperthermal 
Atomic Oxygen Texturing of Optical Fibers Used for Blood Glucose 
Monitoring;
    NASA Case No. LEW-17877-1: Antenna Near-Field Probe Station 
Scanner;
    NASA Case No. LEW-17825-1: Zero G Condensing Heat Exchanger With 
Integral Disinfection;
    NASA Case No. LEW-17306-2: Thin Film Heat Flux Sensor of Improved 
Design Utilizing a Resistance Bridge;
    NASA Case No. LEW-18042-1: Process for Preparing Polymer Reinforced 
Silica Aerogels.

    Dated: February 9, 2007.
Keith T. Sefton,
Deputy General Counsel, Administration and Management.
[FR Doc. E7-2919 Filed 2-21-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-13-P
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**Certification**

 

I, Gary C. Loraditch, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of BCSB Bancorp, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: May 16, 2005
Exhibit 10.1


 


Mutual Assurance Agreement


 


This Mutual Assurance Agreement is entered into effective June 27, 2008 by and between Quality Systems, Inc. and Louis E. Silverman with respect to the following:


 





	
             
 	
            1.
 	
            In light of my resignation from the company effective August 16, 2008,  in order to ensure an orderly transition, the QSI Board of Directors has requested that I resign from the Board effective June 30, 2008.
 






 





	
             
 	
            2.
 	
            I am willing to accommodate the Board's request, and I hereby agree to resign from the Board effective at 12:01am on June 30, 2008, provided the Company and the Board agree with me that this "Early Resignation" from the Board (i.e., resignation as of June 30 rather than August 16):
 






(a) does not constitute a breach of any duties I owe to the Company or trigger any obligations applicable to me under the Employment Agreement; and


 


(b) does not constitute a breach of any duties the Company owes to me or trigger any obligations applicable to the Company with respect to me under the Employment Agreement. 


 


s/LOUIS E. SILVERMAN


Louis E. Silverman


 


Agreed:


QUALITY SYSTEMS, INC.


 


By: s/PAUL HOLT





	
             
 	
            Its: CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  
 





 


 


 


 





	
            


 	
            -5-
Part 2

SUPPLEMENT

DRAFT 

Number Name Description

Fatal/Proposed

Analytical Type

Applicable SMAF Attribute

 / Domain Value Left Side Labe

101

Disaster Emergency Fund Code "G" Balance Check

The sum of the pre-closing ending balances of USSGL accounts with Disaster Emergency Fund Code of "G" must equal zero for each reported TAS.

Fatal 01/02/03/04/05/06/07/08/09/10/11/12 USSGL / Zero All USSGL Accounts 

102

Disaster Emergency Fund Code "H" Balance Check

The sum of the pre-closing ending balances of USSGL accounts with Disaster Emergency Fund Code of "H" must equal zero for each reported TAS

Fatal 01/02/03/04/05/06/07/08/09/10/11/12 USSGL / Zero All USSGL Accounts 

103

Disaster Emergency Fund Code "I" Balance Check

The sum of the pre-closing ending balances of USSGL accounts with Disaster Emergency Fund Code of "I" must equal zero for each reported TAS.

Fatal 01/02/03/04/05/06/07/08/09/10/11/12 USSGL / Zero All USSGL Accounts 

104

Disaster Emergency Fund Code "J" Balance Check

The sum of the pre-closing ending balances of USSGL accounts with Disaster Emergency Fund Code of "J" must equal zero for each reported TAS.

Fatal 01/02/03/04/05/06/07/08/09/10/11/12 USSGL / Zero All USSGL Accounts 

105

Disaster Emergency Fund Code "K" Balance Check

The sum of the pre-closing ending balances of USSGL accounts with Disaster Emergency Fund Code of "K" must equal zero for each reported TAS.

Fatal 01/02/03/04/05/06/07/08/09/10/11/12 USSGL / Zero All USSGL Accounts 

U.S. Standard General Ledger

Data Edits - Summary Report

Bulletin No. 2020-10 DRAFT VII ESR - 1