alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
The cd's for this report can be found at the Indiana University - Bloomington's Virtual CD-ROM/Floppy Disk Library using the following address: https://webapp1.dlib.indiana.edu/virtual_disk_library/index.cgi/5019464.
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 13

- 00459

- CV

In the Interest of L.M.F., a Child §

§

§

§ From the 323rd District Court

o f Tarrant County (323

- 93369J

- 10 )

May 29, 2014

P er C uriam



### JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that

there was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of

the trial court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRIC T COURT OF APPEALS

PER CURIAM
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1532 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1532

  To disqualify from operating a commercial motor vehicle for life an 
 individual who uses a commercial motor vehicle in committing a felony 
                      involving human trafficking.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 12, 2017

 Mr. Thune (for himself, Ms. Klobuchar, and Mr. Nelson) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                 Commerce, Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To disqualify from operating a commercial motor vehicle for life an 
 individual who uses a commercial motor vehicle in committing a felony 
                      involving human trafficking.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No Human Trafficking on Our Roads 
Act''.

SEC. 2. LIFETIME DISQUALIFICATION WITHOUT REINSTATEMENT.

    Section 31310(d) of title 49, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in the heading, by striking ``Controlled Substance 
        Violations'' and inserting ``Lifetime Disqualification Without 
        Reinstatement'';
            (2) by striking ``The Secretary'' and inserting ``(1) 
        Controlled substance violations.--The Secretary''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) Human trafficking violations.--The Secretary shall 
        disqualify from operating a commercial motor vehicle for life 
        an individual who uses a commercial motor vehicle in committing 
        a felony involving an act or practice described in paragraph 
        (9) of section 103 of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 
        2000 (22 U.S.C. 7102(9)).''.
                                 <all>
```
**FY 2023 Scenario Updates**

Page 2 of 2                                        IRC Handout 04/20/2023
No. 65439.

#### M. S. Cowen Company *v.*United States,

protest 277618-K (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *The Best Foods, Inc.*(47 C.C.P.A. 163, C.A.D. 751), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# Orders & Performance

&"Calibri"&11&K000000NONCONFIDENTIAL // FRSONLY&1#		

# 7600EZ

&"Calibri"&11&K000000NONCONFIDENTIAL // FRSONLY&1#		

# Versions

&"Calibri"&11&K000000NONCONFIDENTIAL // FRSONLY&1#
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS4681 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
# Journal officiel C 180A/2 ao

| | ISSN 1725-2431 |
| --- | --- |
| Journal officiel
  de l'Union européenne | C 180A |
| | |
| Édition de langue française | Communications et informations | 49e année2 août 2006 |

ISSN 1725-2431

Journal officiel

de l'Union européenne

C 180A

Édition de langue française

Communications et informations

49e année2 août 2006

---

| Numéro d'information | Sommaire | page |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | |
| 2006/C 180A/1 | | 1 |

Numéro d'information

Sommaire

page

2006/C 180A/1

1

| | III   Informations |
| --- | --- |
| | Banque centrale européenne |
| 2006/C 180A/2 | Poste vacant à la direction générale des affaires juridiques — Conseil juridique | 3 |

III   Informations

Banque centrale européenne

2006/C 180A/2

Poste vacant à la direction générale des affaires juridiques — Conseil juridique

3

| FR | |
| --- | --- |

FR

---

2.8.2006

| 2.8.2006 | FR | Journal officiel de l'Union européenne | CA 180/1 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

FR

Journal officiel de l'Union européenne

CA 180/1

---

AVIS AU LECTEUR

Image

---

III Informations

Banque centrale européenne

| 2.8.2006 | FR | Journal officiel de l'Union européenne | CA 180/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

2.8.2006

FR

Journal officiel de l'Union européenne

CA 180/3

---

POSTE VACANT À LA DIRECTION GÉNÉRALE DES AFFAIRES JURIDIQUES — CONSEIL JURIDIQUE

(2006/C 180 A/01)

La Banque centrale européenne recherche des candidats qualifiés en vue de pourvoir au poste de conseil juridique au sein de la direction générale des affaires juridiques. Des informations détaillées sur le profil requis et les fonctions attachées à ce poste ainsi que sur la procédure à suivre pour faire acte de candidature sont publiées sur le site internet de la BCE à l'adresse suivante: www.ecb.int (rubrique «Job opportunities»).

---
# C_2017086EN.01002602.xml

| 20.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 86/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 86/26

---

Judgment of the General Court of 9 February 2017 — International Gaming Projects v EUIPO — adp Gauselmann (TRIPLE EVOLUTION)

(Case T-82/16) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the figurative EU trade mark TRIPLE EVOLUTION - Earlier EU word mark Evolution - Relative ground of refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2017/C 086/35)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: International Gaming Projects Ltd (Qormi, Malta) (represented initially by M. Garayalde Niño and A. Alpera Plazas, and subsequently by M. Garayalde Niño, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Bonne, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: adp Gauselmann GmbH (Espelkamp, Germany) (represented by: P. Koch Moreno, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 December 2015 (Case R 0725/2015-2), relating to opposition proceedings between adp Gauselmann and International Gaming Projects.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders International Gaming Projects Ltd to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders International Gaming Projects Ltd to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 136, 18.4.2016.

1

---
No. 49571.

#### Protest 103786-K of Mitchel F. Barnet (New York).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

It was stipulated that the hides are similar to those involved in *Rice*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 118, C. D. 807). Theclaimwas therefore sustained as to those hides entered for consumption after the effective date of said trade agreement.
Form 8821 

(Rev. January 2021) 

Tax Information Authorization 

Department of the Treasury 

Internal Revenue Service 

▶ Go to www.irs.gov/Form8821 for instructions and the latest information.

▶ Don’t sign this form unless all applicable lines have been completed. 

▶ Don’t use Form 8821 to request copies of your tax returns 

or to authorize someone to represent you. See instructions.

OMB No. 1545-1165 

For IRS Use Only 

Received by: 

Name 

Telephone

Function

Date

1 Taxpayer information. Taxpayer must sign and date this form on line 6. 

Taxpayer name and address Taxpayer identification number(s)

Daytime telephone number Plan number (if applicable) 

2 Designee(s). If you wish to name more than two designees, attach a list to this form. Check here if a list of additional 

designees is attached ▶ 

Name and address 

Check if to be sent copies of notices and communications

CAF No. 

PTIN 

Telephone No. 

Fax No. 

Check if new: Address Telephone No. Fax No. 

Name and address 

Check if to be sent copies of notices and communications

CAF No. 

PTIN 

Telephone No. 

Fax No. 

Check if new: Address Telephone No. Fax No. 

3 Tax information. Each designee is authorized to inspect and/or receive confidential tax information for the type of tax, forms, 

periods, and specific matters you list below. See the line 3 instructions. 

By checking here, I authorize access to my IRS records via an Intermediate Service Provider.

(a) 

Type of Tax Information (Income, 

Employment, Payroll, Excise, Estate, Gift, 

Civil Penalty, Sec. 4980H Payments, etc.) 

(b) 

Tax Form Number 

(1040, 941, 720, etc.)

(c) 

Year(s) or Period(s)

(d) 

Specific Tax Matters

4 Specific use not recorded on the Centralized Authorization File (CAF). If the tax information authorization is for a 

specific use not recorded on CAF, check this box. See the instructions. If you check this box, skip line 5 . . . . . . ▶

5 Retention/revocation of prior tax information authorizations. If the line 4 box is checked, skip this line. If the line 4 box 

isn’t checked, the IRS will automatically revoke all prior tax information authorizations on file unless you check the line 5 

box and attach a copy of the tax information authorization(s) that you want to retain . . . . . . . . . . . . ▶

To revoke a prior tax information authorization(s) without submitting a new authorization, see the line 5 instructions.

6 Taxpayer signature. If signed by a corporate officer, partner, guardian, partnership representative (or designated 

individual, if applicable), executor, receiver, administrator, trustee, or individual other than the taxpayer, I certify that I have 

the legal authority to execute this form with respect to the tax matters and tax periods shown on line 3 above.

▶ IF NOT COMPLETED, SIGNED, AND DATED, THIS TAX INFORMATION AUTHORIZATION WILL BE RETURNED. 

▶ DON’T SIGN THIS FORM IF IT IS BLANK OR INCOMPLETE. 

Signature Date 

Print Name Title (if applicable) 

For Privacy Act and Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see the instructions. Cat. No. 11596P Form 8821 (Rev. 01-2021)
Filed by Bowne Pure Compliance







Exhibit 10.1




PROMISSORY NOTE




$125,000.00





April 25th, 2008



FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned Global Clean Energy, Inc., a Maryland corporation (“Maker”) promises to pay to
the order of Profit Consultants Inc (“Lender”), at its principal office, or at such other place as may be designated in
writing by the holders of this Promissory Note (“Note”), the principal sum of ONE HUNDRED TWENTY FIVE THOUSAND 00/100
DOLLARS ($125,000.00) (the “Principal Sum”). The unpaid Principal Sum shall bear interest at 7.5% per annum and shall
be due in twelve (12) months.



All payments to be made under this Note shall be payable in lawful money of the United States of America which
shall be legal tender for public and private debts at the time of payment.



In the event that an action is instituted to collect this Note, or any portion thereof, Maker promises to pay all
costs of collection, including but not limited to reasonable attorneys’ fees, court costs, and such other sums as the
court may establish.



In the event of a default under this Note when due, then the holder of this Note, at its election, may declare the
entire unpaid Principal Sum due and payable.



Every provision hereof is intended to be several. If any provision of this Note is determined, by a court of
competent jurisdiction to be illegal, invalid or unenforceable, such illegality, invalidity or unenforceability shall
not affect the other provisions hereof, which shall remain binding and enforceable.



This Note is made in the State of Maryland and it is mutually agreed that Maryland law shall apply to the
interpretation of the terms and conditions of this Note.



All agreements between the holder of this Note and Maker are hereby expressly limited so that in no contingency or
event whatsoever, whether by reason of deferment or acceleration of the maturity of this Note or otherwise, shall the
rate of interest hereunder exceed the maximum permissible under applicable law with respect to the holder. If, from
any circumstances whatsoever, the rate of interest resulting from the payment and/or accrual of any amount of interest
hereunder, at any time that payment of interest is due and/or at any time that interest is accrued, shall exceed the
limits prescribed by such applicable law, then the payment and/or accrual of such interest shall be reduced to that
resulting from the maximum rate of interest permissible under such applicable law. This provision shall never be
superseded or waived.



The makers, endorsers, and/or guarantors of this Note do hereby severally waive presentment, demand, protest and
notices of protest, demand, dishonor and nonpayment.


 


1









 





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument is executed as of the date first hereinabove set forth.



GLOBAL CLEAN ENERGY, INC.



By:
/s/ Kenneth Adessky                                                      


Kenneth Adessky, CFO



 


2
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 4.70
                                                             English Translation

                             LETTER OF AUTHORIZATION

     I, Gu Lei, a Chinese citizen with ID number 310229197701210026, hereby
irrevocably authorize [Li Guang Xin] to exercise the following rights within the
effective term of this Letter of Authorization:

     I authorize [Li Guang Xin] to fully represent me to exercise all the voting
rights of a shareholder according to laws and the Articles of Association on the
shareholder meeting of Shanghai Langyi Advertising Co., Ltd., including but not
limited to selling or transferring all or any part of my shares of Shanghai
Langyi Advertising Co., Ltd, and as my authorized representative, appointing
directors and the general manager of Shanghai Langyi Advertising Co., Ltd on the
shareholder meeting.

     The aforesaid authorization is based on the condition that [Li Guang Xin]
is an employee of Shanghai Linktone Software Co., Ltd, and Shanghai Linktone
Software Co., Ltd agrees upon such authorization. Once [Li Guang Xin] no longer
works in Shanghai Linktone Software Co., Ltd or Shanghai Linktone Software Co.,
Ltd sends a written notice for removing or replacing such authorized
representative, I will immediately withdraw my authorization granted to [Li
Guang Xin] and appoint/authorize another employee appointed by Shanghai Linktone
Software Co., Ltd to fully exercise all my voting rights as a shareholder on the
shareholder meeting of Shanghai Langyi Advertising Co., Ltd.

     Except where the Business Operation Agreement signed by Shanghai Linktone
Software Co., Ltd, Shanghai Langyi Advertising Co., Ltd, I, and Chen Jin is
otherwise terminated in advance for any reason, this Letter of Authorization
will become effective as of its signing date and will remain effective for 10
years.


                                                    /s/ Gu Lei
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Gu Lei
                                        Date December 14, 2007
                                             -----------------------------------
# C_2017086EN.01001502.xml

| 20.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 86/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 86/15

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Social No 33 de Madrid (Spain) lodged on 29 December 2016 — Lucía Montero Mateos v Agencia Madrileña de Atención Social de la Consejería de Políticas Sociales y Familia de la Comunidad Autónoma de Madrid

(Case C-677/16)

(2017/C 086/19)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Referring court

Juzgado de lo Social No 33 de Madrid

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Lucía Montero Mateos

Applicant:

Defendant: Agencia Madrileña de Atención Social de la Consejería de Políticas Sociales y Familia de la Comunidad Autónoma de Madrid

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Must clause 4(1) of the Framework Agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP which forms part of the Community legal order by virtue of Council Directive 1999/70 (1) be interpreted as meaning that termination of a temporary ‘contrato de interinidad’ to cover a vacancy when the term for which the contract was concluded by the employer and the worker expires constitutes objective grounds justifying the Spanish legislature’s not providing in such a case for any compensation whatsoever for the termination of the contract, whereas compensation of 20 days’ pay for every year of service is provided for in the case of a comparable permanent worker dismissed on objective grounds?

1

---

(1)  OJ 1999 L 175, p. 1.

1

---
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FIFTH DISTRICT

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

EDWARD EGNELL, 

Appellant, 

v. Case No. 5D21-2370 

LT Case No. 2020-CP-15490 

ESTATE OF BEATE M. DIETZ,

CHRISTIAN DIETZ, STEFANIE D. 

SIMPSON, AND ANGELIKA TEMPLE, 

Appellees. 

________________________________/

Decision filed July 27, 2022

Appeal from the Circuit Court

for Brevard County, 

Morgan Laur Reinman, Judge.

Elizabeth Siano Harris, of Harris 

Appellate Law Office, Mims, for 

Appellant. 

Maureen Monaghan Matheson, of 

Matheson Appellate Law, P.A., 

Satellite Beach, and Carmine D. 

Gigliotti, of The Law Office of Carmine D., 

P.A., Melbourne, for Appellees. 

PER CURIAM. 

AFFIRMED. 

EVANDER, COHEN and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MLEA, INC. :

AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO :

ENGINEERED GAS SYSTEMS, LLP :

AND MAIN LINE ENGINEERING :

ASSOCIATES : CIVIL ACTION

: NO. 02-4393

: 

:

 VS. : 

:

:

:

ATLANTIC RECYCLED RUBBER :

INC., ET AL :

 ORDER

AND NOW, this 15th day of MARCH, 2005, in accordance

with the court’s procedure for random reassignment of cases, it is hereby, 

 ORDERED that the above captioned case is reassigned from the

calendar of the late Honorable James McGirr Kelly to the calendar of the Honorable

Juan R. Sánchez. 

FOR THE COURT:

 

JAMES T. GILES

Chief Judge

ATTEST:

 

MICHAEL E. KUNZ

Clerk of Court

Case 2:02-cv-04393-JS Document 42 Filed 03/15/2005 Page 1 of 1
Document

Exhibit 10.54


2020 Executive Bonus Plan, as amended on August 4, 2020


In August 2020, our board of directors amended the 2020 Executive Bonus Plan, which we refer to as the 2020 Bonus Plan, as amended. Our named executive officers are participants in the 2020 Bonus Plan, as amended. The 2020 Bonus Plan, as amended provides for non-equity incentive compensation based upon the achievement of billings growth in fiscal year 2020, which we refer to as the financial goal.


The threshold level of achievement of the financial goal of billings growth is at least 89.1%. If we achieve less than 89.1% of the financial goal, participants will receive 0% of the target incentive. For achievement of the financial goal between the threshold and target of 100%, the overall incentive payment scales linearly between 0% and 100%. The maximum level of the incentive payments is 100%.


All bonuses under the 2020 Bonus Plan, as amended are subject to the participant maintaining minimum performance standards, as determined by us, and remaining employed through the date a bonus is paid out.
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Merrill Lynch
Preferred Capital Trust IV and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding IV, L.P.
(the "Partnership") for the period ended June 25, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, John J. Fosina, Controller of Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., the General
Partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Partnership.




                              MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING IV, L.P.

                              By:  MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC., as General Partner


                              By:  /s/ JOHN J. FOSINA
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                              Name:    John J. Fosina *
                              Title:   Controller, Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.








Dated: August 4, 2004
_____________________

*  John J. Fosina functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
   and Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership for purposes of Section 906
   of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 67 Filed 07/16/2004 Page 1 of 8
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 67 Filed 07/16/2004 Page 2 of 8
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 67 Filed 07/16/2004 Page 3 of 8
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 67 Filed 07/16/2004 Page 4 of 8
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 67 Filed 07/16/2004 Page 5 of 8
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 67 Filed 07/16/2004 Page 6 of 8
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 67 Filed 07/16/2004 Page 7 of 8
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 67 Filed 07/16/2004 Page 8 of 8
# Sheet1

April 21, 2021 IRC  Handout