alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Cement Manufacturing Process Flow Diagram

Sites Controlled by Others

Processing Raw 

Materials

Raw Material 

Loading

Wastewater 

Treatment 

Sludge Storage

B

Processing Raw Materials

- Primary and Secondary 

Crushing

-Screening

-- Raw mill feed belt

-- Raw mill weigh hopper

-- Raw mill air separator

Wastewater 

Treatment 

Sludge 

Unloading

A 415,000 kg/year

C

Raw Material 

Preparation 

(Proportioning 

and Grinding)

D

Slurry Mixing 

and Blending

E

Rotary Kiln

F

Clinker Cooler

G

H Clinker Storage

Finish Grinding 

Mill

J

Product Storage

K

Shipment

L

Air Separator

I

Gypsum

1

Raw Materials

330,000 kg/hr or 

2,300,000,000 kg/year 

(estimated)

0.05 kg/day

Baghouse

5.4 kg/day
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Merrill Lynch
Preferred Capital Trust III and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding III, L.P.
(the "Partnership") for the period ended March 26, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, John J. Fosina, Controller of Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., the General
Partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Partnership.




                              MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING III, L.P.

                              By:  MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC., as General Partner


                              By:  /s/ JOHN J. FOSINA
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                              Name:    John J. Fosina *
                              Title:   Controller, Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.








Dated: May 6, 2004
__________________

*  John J. Fosina functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
   and Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership for purposes of Section 906
   of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
1790 

RECORDS OF THE STATE ENUMERATIONS: 1782 TO 1785 

VIRGINIA 

The publication of “Ha3ds of: Fwailks, ‘I’he k’itw G.I!~~s of ;Irv 

United States, 1790-Virginia” brings to three the number of 

reprints completed in this series. 

The census records ori South Carolina and North Carolina were 

-completed and released earlier this year. 

In all, original census records are available on 12 slates. At least 

two more volumes, prohahly Pennqlrania and New York, wiil 

be reprinted nest year. The records on other states will he 

undertaken fram time to time until tile entire set is coml~lcfcd. 

Reprint Compallg now has under way Hcrifnge Swies of reprints 

on South Carolina ,and North Carolina with the foHowing ~olurnes 

completed : 

South Carolina-Dr. J. 13, 0. Landrum’s “Colonial and ~cvolutionary History of Upller South Car&a” :md “Hisforg of Spnrkurburg C0unty”; Dr. David Ramsay’s “Hi:itory of South CawlEna, ’’ thxJ \:01u111cs; and Dr. John H. Logan’s “History r,I the 

Upper Cowltry of South Carolina.”
No. 50390.

#### Protests 67544-K, etc., of H. Jacobs & Sons, Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such a's to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801),’which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83, decided February 5, 1945.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries. The protests were sustained to this extent.
No. 49583.

#### Protest 105233-K of H. S. Cramer & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

It was stipulated that the hides in question are similar to those involved in *Rice*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 118 C. D. 807) and that the record in said case be incorporated herein. In accordance therewith the hides entered for consumption or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption on or after the effective date of said trade agreement were held dutiable at 5 percent under paragraph 1530 (a) and said trade agreement.
Exhibit 32.1

                 Statement of Chief Executive Officer Furnished
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      The undersigned, Kim S. Price, is the President and Chief Executive
Officer of Citizens South Banking Corporation (the "Company").

      This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the
Company of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2004 (the "Report").

      By execution of this statement, I certify that to the best of my
knowledge:

            A)    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
                  U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and

            B)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
                  covered by the Report.

      This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so
that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that this
statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.


May 7, 2004                              /s/ Kim S. Price
-----------------                        ---------------------------------------
Dated                                    Kim S. Price
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer


                                       19
No. 56358.

petition 6771-R (New Orleans).

#### Ernst Roth & Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

. From the testimony it appeared that since the merchandise was purchased by mail and there was no opportunity to inspect the goods, the petitioner obtained the services of a firm for the purpose of examining and rejecting inferior merchandise, paying said firm 3 percent for such service. In some instances, an additional 1 percent was paid to another agent, and petitioner’s witness was of the opinion that these payments were not part of the value of the goods for duty purposes. However, after the petitioner informed the Government officials relative to said payments, the appraiser advised petitioner that the entries should be corrected accprdingly. Certain New York entries, covered by other importations, were amended, but the New Orleans entries in question were not amended by the broker. From a consideration of the evidence in the case it was held that the petitioner entered the handbags in good faith and had no intention to defraud the revenue or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore granted.
# C_2018094EN.01002301.xml

| 12.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/23

---

Judgment of the General Court of 25 January 2018 — SilverTours v EUIPO (billiger-mietwagen.de)

(Case T-866/16) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Application for the EU word mark billiger-mietwagen.de - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptiveness - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)))

(2018/C 094/30)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: SilverTours GmbH (Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany) (represented by: P. Neuwald, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Hanne, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 3 November 2016 (Case R 206/2016-5), concerning an application for registration of the word sign billiger-mietwagen.de as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders SilverTours GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders SilverTours GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 53, 20.2.2017.

1

---
Before the Third Division,

October 16, 1946

No. 51359.

#### Protests 946606-G, etc., of Iwata Trading Co., Inc., et al. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the' same in all material respects as that passed upon in *Woolworth*v. *United States*(T. D. 47647) and Abstract 34216. In accordance therewith the claim for free entry under paragraph 1703 was sustained.
Exhibit 31.1

           Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

I, David S. Ahl, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Sunshine PCS
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

         (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date:  March 30, 2007


/s/ David S. Ahl
----------------
David S. Ahl
Chief Executive Officer
No. 57234.

protests 872747-G, etc. (New York).

#### Schild-Adelstein Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the kidskin plates are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Kung Chen Fur Corpn.*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Ford, J., concurred.

Mollison, J., dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1480, *supra.*
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6015

RICHARD LAMAR FENSTERMACHER; LARRY C. MCFARLAND; EDWARD LEE BRAGG; STEVEN WHISENANT, Plaintiffs - Appellants, versus G. P. DODSON; RONALD ANGELONE, Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (MISC-95-46-R) Submitted: May 16, 1996 Decided: June 3, 1996 Before RUSSELL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Richard Lamar Fenstermacher, Larry C. McFarland, Edward Lee Bragg, Steven Whisenant, Appellants Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Appellants appeal from the district court's order denying their motion for a temporary restraining order or a preliminary injunction prohibiting the Defendants from transferring them from their current correctional institute or from transferring them within the institute. To the extent that Appellants appeal from the court's denial of a temporary restraining order, that order is not appealable. See Virginia v. Tenneco, Inc. , 538 F.2d 1026, 1029-30 (4th Cir. 1976). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no abuse of discretion and no reversible error. See Direx Israel, Ltd. v. Breakthrough Medical Corp. , 952 F.2d 802, 812-13 (4th Cir. 1991). Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Fenstermacher v. Dodson , No. MISC95-46-R (W.D. Va. Dec. 15, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented inthe materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
ATTACHMENT III - EXPLANATORY APPENDIX

On June 16, 2009, the Agency issued the Phase 5 Reregistration 

Eligibility Decision (RED) Product Data Call-In Notice pursuant to sections 

4(g)(2)(B) of FIFRA which required the registrants of products containing MGK264 used as an active ingredient to develop and submit certain data. The 

data/information were determined to be necessary to satisfy the reregistration 

requirements of section 4(g). Failure to comply with the requirements of a Phase 

5 Reregistration Eligibility Decision Product Data Call-In Notice (PDCI) is a basis 

for suspension under section 3(c) (2) (B) of FIFRA.

Adams Technology Systems received the MGK-264 RED/PDCI, as 

evidenced by the US Postal Service domestic return receipt card which was 

signed by Rob Adams. The 90-day response was due to the Agency on 

November 6, 2009. On March 17, 2010, the Risk Management and 

Implementation Branch V (RMIBV), Branch Chief, Patricia L. Moe, sent a

certified letter to Mr. Rob B. Adams Jr. and informed him that Adams 

Technology Systems did not submit their 90-day PDCI response and it remains 

outstanding. The 8-month response for this product (which was required to be 

submitted by March 16, 2010) has not been received by the Agency. Neither the 

90-day response (due 90 days after the registrant received the PDCI) nor the 8-

month responses (due 8 months after the registrant received the PDCI) have 

been received by the Agency. On April 25, 2012, the Risk Management and 

Implementation Branch V, Chemical Review Manager, Veronica Dutch, sent a 

certified letter to Mr. Rob Adams, Jr., and informed him that Adams Technology 

Systems’ required 8-month PDCI response for the MGK-264 product (EPA Reg. 

No. 7754-41) was overdue. In the April 25, 2012, letter, it was stated that the 

Application for Reregistration (EPA Form 8570-1), two copies of the Confidential 

Statement of Formula (CSF), five copies of the draft labels, Certification with 

Respect to Citation of Data (EPA Form 8570-34), and Data Matrix (EPA Form 

8570-35) needed to be submitted for the product within 10 days from Adams 

Technology Systems’ receipt of the letter or a Notice of Intent to Suspend would 

be issued. Adams Technology Systems received the letter as evidenced by the 

US Postal Service domestic return receipt card, which was dated and signed by 

Rob Adams on April 30, 2012. 

To date, the 90-day response, the 8-month response, and the product 

specific data required for this product have not yet been received by the Agency. 

Therefore, this Notice of Intent to Suspend is being issued.
# March 2015

# April 2015

# May 2015

# June 2015

# July 2015

# August 2015

# September 2015

# October 2015

# November 2015

# December 2015

# January 2016

# February 2016

# March 2016

# April 2016

# May 2016

# June 2016

# July 2016

# August 2016

# September 2016

# FY 2017 October 2016

# November 2016

# December 2016
# C_2017022EN.01003602.xml

| 23.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/36

---

Order of the General Court of 24 November 2016 — ED v EUIPO

(Case T-512/16) (1)

1

((Civil service - Temporary staff - Teleworking - Request for extension - Refusal - Actions - Subsequent grant of invalidity - No need to adjudicate))

(2017/C 022/50)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ED (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: S. Pappas, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Lukošiūtė, P. Saba and D. Botis, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought under Article 270 TFEU, seeking annulment of the decision of EUIPO of 15 January 2014 refusing to grant the applicant’s request of 26 September 2013 to be allowed essentially to continue teleworking from Barcelona (Spain) until her health was restored.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no need to adjudicate in the present case. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no need to adjudicate in the present case.

| 2. | ED shall bear one third of her own costs |
| --- | --- |

2.

ED shall bear one third of her own costs

| 3. | The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall bear its own costs and pay two thirds of the costs incurred by ED. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall bear its own costs and pay two thirds of the costs incurred by ED.

---

(1)  OJ C 184, 16.6.2014 (case initially registered before the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union under number F-35/14 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1.9.2016).

1

---
Case 2:02-cv-20143-HB Document 35 Filed 06/19/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:02-cv-20143-HB Document 35 Filed 06/19/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:02-cv-20143-HB Document 35 Filed 06/19/2007 Page 3 of 3
# HARVEST NATURAL RESOURCES, INC.

FORM 10-K (Annual Report)



## Filed 05/02/13 for the Period Ending 12/31/12

Address 1177 ENCLAVE PARKWAY STE 300 HOUSTON, TX 77077 Telephone 281-899-5700 CIK 0000845289 Symbol HNR SIC Code 1311 - Crude Petroleum and Natural Gas Industry Oil & Gas Operations Sector Energy Fiscal Year 12/31

http://www.edgar-online.com © Copyright 2013, EDGAR Online, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Distribution and use of this document restricted under EDGAR Online, Inc. Terms of Use.
----

----

I Comunicações

Comissão

----

Taxas de câmbio do euro (1)

22 de Agosto de 2006

(2006/C 198/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Fonte: Taxas de câmbio de referência publicadas pelo Banco Central Europeu.

----

----

Informações comunicadas pelos Estados-Membros relativas a auxílios estatais concedidos nos termos do Regulamento (CE) n.o 70/2001 da Comissão, de 12 de Janeiro de 2001, relativo à aplicação dos artigos 87.o e 88.o do Tratado CE aos auxílios estatais a favor das pequenas e médias empresas

(2006/C 198/02)

(Texto relevante para efeitos do EEE)

----

----

Informações comunicadas pelos Estados-Membros relativas a auxílios estatais concedidos nos termos do Regulamento (CE) n.o 70/2001 da Comissão, de 12 de Janeiro de 2001, relativo à aplicação dos artigos 87.o e 88.o do Tratado CE aos auxílios estatais a favor das pequenas e médias empresas

(2006/C 198/03)

(Texto relevante para efeitos do EEE)

----

----

Notificação prévia de uma concentração

(Processo n.o COMP/M.4215 — Glatfelter/Crompton Assets)

(2006/C 198/04)

(Texto relevante para efeitos do EEE)

----

(1)JO L 24 de 29.1.2004, p. 1.

----

III Informações

Comissão

----

Alteração do anúncio de concurso para a restituição à exportação de cevada para determinados países terceiros

(«Jornal Oficial da União Europeia» C 148 de 24 de Junho de 2006)

(2006/C 198/05)

Na página 43, o ponto 1 da secção III, «Propostas», é substituído pelo seguinte:

----

----

Alteração do anúncio de concurso para a restituição à exportação de trigo mole para determinados países terceiros

(«Jornal Oficial da União Europeia» C 148 de 24 de Junho de 2006)

(2006/C 198/06)

Na página 46, o ponto 1 da secção III, «Propostas», é substituído pelo seguinte:

----