alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<Page>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, JOHN G. SIMMONDS, the CEO of Pivotal Self-Service Technologies Inc. (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)  The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of the Company for the twelve month
     period ended December 31, 2002, (the "Report") fully complies with the
     requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchanges Act
     of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                                     By: /s/ John G. Simmonds
                                                         --------------------
                                                         CEO

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Pivotal Self-Service Technologies Inc. and will be retained by
Pivotal Technologies Self-Service Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

                                                     Date: March 15, 2004


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, GARY N. HOKKANEN, the interim CFO of Pivotal Self-Service Technologies Inc.
(the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)  The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of the Company for the twelve month
     period ended December 31, 2002, (the "Report") fully complies with the
     requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchanges Act
     of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                                     By: /s/ Gary N. Hokkanen
                                                         --------------------
                                                         Interim CFO

                                                     Date: March 15, 2004

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Pivotal Self-Service Technologies Inc. and will be retained by
Pivotal Technologies Self-Service Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

M EMORANDUM O RDER

Appellate case name: In re Fort Bend Independent School District

Appellate case number: 01

- 18

- 01113

- CV

Trial court case number: 18

- DCV

- 251366

Trial court: 434th District Court of Fort Bend County

On August 7 , 2019, relator, Fort Bend Independent School District (FBISD) , filed its

second supplemental petition for writ of mandamus seeking to compel the respondent district judge

to vacate his August 6 , 2019 order re

- appointing Michael W. Elliott as a master in chancery in the underlying proceedings and seeking to compel the respondent to enter an order, pursuant to FBISD’s July 25, 2019 notice of nonsuit, dismissing the underlying proceedings

.

With the supplemental petition, relator also filed an opposed “Motion for Expedited Consideration and Temporary Relief on Fort Bend Independent School District’s Second Supplemental Petition for Writ of Mandamus” seeking expedited consideration of this original proceeding and a temporary stay of all proceedings in the trial court , pending disposition of FBISD’s three related mandamus petitions . Relator’s motion contains the required certificate of compliance. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.10(a).

Accordingly, the Court grants the relator’s motion and ORDERS that all proceedings in

the trial court in the above

- captioned cause number are stayed . This stay is effective until the

mandamus petition s in this Court are finally decided or this Court otherw ise orders the stay lifted.

See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.10(b). Any party may file a motion for reconsideration of the stay. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.10(c).

Finally, the Court requests a response to the second supplemental petition for writ of mandamus by the rea l party in interest, Michael W. Elliott

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 52.8(b)(1). The response, if any, shall be filed within 5 days from the date of this order

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 2,

52.4.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Evelyn V. Keyes

x Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: August 8 , 2019
No. 59492.

protest 180705-K (Buffalo).

#### C. J. Tower & Sons *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of beef similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Swift & Company et al.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 212, C. D. 1655), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
#### Jessie Leon TITTLE, as Administrator of the Estate of Stephen Warren Tittle, Plaintiff-Appellant, Rebecca Alexander, as Administratrix of the Estate of Tom Harrell, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellant, v. JEFFERSON COUNTY COMMISSION, David Orange, John Katopodis, Reuben Davis, Jim Gunter, Chris McNair, Jefferson County, Giattina, Fisher & Co., Architects, Inc., Defendants-Appellees.

No. 91-7054.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

March 16, 1993.

Clarence L. McDorman, Yearout, Myers & Traylor, P.C., Birmingham, AL, for R. Alexander.

John F. Kizer, Jr., Jeffrey W. Bennitt, Kizer & Bennitt, Birmingham, AL, for Jessie Leon Tittle.

Charles S. Wagner, Jeffrey M. Sewell, Jefferson County Attorney’s Office, Birmingham, AL, for defendants-appellees.

*

 Senior U.S. Circuit Judge John C. Godbold has elected to participate in further proceedings in this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 46(c).

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

(Opinion July 14, 1992, 11th Cir., 1992, 966 F.2d 606)

Before UOFLAT, Chief Judge, FAY, KRAVITCH, HATCHETT, ANDERSON, EDMONDSON, COX, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK and CARNES, Circuit Judges.*

BY THE COURT:

A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on whether this case should be reheard by the Court sitting en banc, and a majority of the judges of this Court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that the above cause, 966 F.2d 606, shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel’s opinion is hereby VACATED.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Directory of farmercooperatives**
 
2001 | 2004
 
SuDoc Number:A 109.9/2:
Item Number:0064-C-02 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000561711
 
February 18, 2020
1

CLD

- 140 NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________ No. 13

- 4314

___________ IN RE: FREDERICK H. BANKS, Petitioner

____________________________________ On a Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the United Stat es District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania (Related to Crim. Nos. 04

- cr - 00176

- 001 & 03

- cr - 00245

- 001)

____________________________________ Submitted Pursuant to Rule 21, Fed. R. App. P.

December 19, 2013 Before: FUENTES, JORDAN and SHWARTZ , Circuit Judges

(Opinion filed : January 7, 2014 )

_________ OPINION

_________ PER CURIAM Frederick Banks has filed a petition for a writ of mandamus requesting that we order the District Court to direct a Magistrate Judge to vacate her finding that there was probable cause to hold him on a violation of supervised release. He also requests that he be released from custody. For the below reasons, we will deny the petition. In 2005 and 2006, Banks was convicted of mail fraud, criminal copyright infringement, money laun dering, uttering and possession of a counterfeit or forged security, and witness tampering. He was sentenced to 123 months in prison and six years2

of supervised release. In May 2013, Banks was released from prison. In October 2013, a petition was filed requesting a warrant for Banks’s arrest for violating the terms of his supervised release. On October 24, 2013, a Magistrate Judge found that probable cause existed to hold Banks. Three days later, Banks filed his mandamus petition. The writ of mandamus will issue only in extraordinary circumstances. See Sporck v. Peil , 759 F.2d 312, 314 (3d Cir. 1985). As a precondition to the issuance of the writ, the petitioner must establish that there is no alternative remedy or other adequate means to obtain the desired relief, and the petitioner must demonstrate a clear and indisputable right to the relief sought. Kerr v. U.S. Dist. Court , 426 U.S. 394, 403 (1976). A writ is not a substitute for an appeal. See In Re Brisco , 448 F.3d 201, 212 (3d Cir. 2006).
O n November 25, 2013, after Banks had filed his mandamus petition, the District Court found that Banks had violated his supervised release. He was sentenced to fourteen months in prison and six months of supervised release. Banks has appealed the District Court’s decision. See C.A. No. 13

- 4594. Because Banks has an alternate remedy to challenge the revocation of his supervised release and is, in fact, pursuing that remedy, we will deny the mandamus petition.
----

----

I Informacija

Komisija

----

Euro kursas (1)

2006 m. liepos 25 d.

(2006/C 173/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Šaltinis: valiutų perskaičiavimo kursai paskelbti ECB.

----

----

Komisijos informacija, susijusi su Tarybos direktyvos įgyvendinimu 93/42/EEB

(2006/C 173/02)

(Tekstas svarbus EEE)

Direktyvą atitinkančių darniųjų standartų antraščių ir nuorodinių žymenų skelbimas

Pavyzdys. Standartui EN 60601-1:1990 taikoma:

----

----

Valstybių narių skelbiami sprendimai suteikti arba panaikinti licencijas oro susisiekimui vykdyti pagal Tarybos reglamentas (EEB) Nr. 2407/92 dėl oro vežėjų licencijavimo (1) (2) 13 straipsnio 4 dalį

(2006/C 173/03)

(Tekstas svarbus EEE)

AUSTRIJA

Licencijos oro susisiekimui vykdyti panaikintos

B kategorija:   Licencijos oro susisiekimui vykdyti, kurioms taikomas Reglamento (EEB) Nr. 2407/92 5 straipsnio 7 dalies a punkto apribojimas

----

(1)OL L 240, 1992 8 24, p. 1.

(2)  Europos Komisijai pranešta iki 2005 8 31.

----

----

Išankstinis pranešimas apie koncentraciją

(Byla Nr. COMP/M.4303 — Macquarie/South East London & Kent Bus Company/East London Bus & Coach Company)

Bylą numatoma nagrinėti supaprastinta tvarka

(2006/C 173/04)

(Tekstas svarbus EEE)

----

(1)OL L 24, 2004 1 29, p. 1.

(2)OL C 56, 2005 3 5, p. 32.

----

----

Išankstinis pranešimas apie koncentraciją

(Byla Nr. COMP/M.4228 — Mibau Holding GmbH/Foster Yeoman Baumineralien GmbH/Figdor Baustoffhandel GmbH (JV))

Bylą numatoma nagrinėti supaprastinta tvarka

(2006/C 173/05)

(Tekstas svarbus EEE)

----

(1)OL L 24, 2004 1 29, p. 1.

(2)OL C 56, 2005 3 5, p. 32.

----
## Kern L. Prescott

3 Goldeneye Drive Topsham, ME 04086 Residence: (207) 319-7589 Cell Phone: (207) 841-1 181 State House E-Mail: RepKerri .Prescottlegislature.maine.gov E-Mail: prescottstaterep@yahoo.com july 13, 2011 The Honorable Ray LaHood Secretary Department of Transportation 1200 NewJcrsey Avenue, S.E. Washington, DC 20590 

# HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 2 STATE HOUSE STATION AUGUSTA, MAINE 04333-0002

(207) 287-1400 TTY: (207) 287-4469

Dear Secretary LaHood and AdmimstratorJackson: I understand the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) will be reviewing the already rigorous fuel economy standards that will be in effect from 2012 to 2016 to determine if they need to be increased beginning in 2017. As House Chair of the Maine Legislature's Joint Standing Committee on Labor, Commerce, Research and Economic Development, I would like to take this opportunity to share with you my concerns about issuing even tougher fuel economy requirements. Every day my colleagues and I hear about the issues facing Maine people. The majority center around the economy, with many focused on the high cost of energy, food and transportation - elements essential to raising families and building businesses. In Maine, with very few exceptions, every family relies on cars and trucks to get where they need to go. Industries across our state from shipbuilding and papermaking to farming and fishing to tourism and the service sector depend on motor vehicles to meet obligations to their customers. I believe the last thing we should do is add on regulations that will make it even more expensive for Maine people to feed their families, own a vehicle or create new jobs. We need transportation that is safe, reliable and affordable. Otherwise, we are putting our families, jobs and businesses at risk. I ask that NHTSA and EPA give every consideration to establishing a single, national fuel economy standard that takes into account the potential economic impacts that more stringent standards would bring to so many hardworking Maine people. I appreciate your taking the time to review my concerns and look forward to following your actions on this important issue.

ern L. Prescott State Representative cc: Honorable Olympia J. Snowe Honorable Susan M. Collins Honorable Michael H. Michaud Honorable Chellie Pingree

Printed on recycled paper
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

 : 

LEE ARTERS t/a GREENDALE BUILDERS : CIVIL ACTION - LAW 

 : 

 : 

 Plaintiff, : 

 : 

 v. : 

: No. 02-CV-4388 

ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE CO. t/a, : 

ZURICH NORTH AMERICA as successor in : 

Interest to ASSURANCE CO. OF AMERICA, et al. : JURY OF TWELVE (12) 

 : DEMANDED 

 : 

 Defendants. : 

 : 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 The undersigned counsel hereby certifies that on this day a true and correct copy of the 

foregoing Plaintiff’s Reply Brief to Defendant’s Brief in Opposition was served by first class mail, 

postage prepaid, addressed as follows: 

Carl H. Delacato, Jr., Esquire 

Hecker, Brown, Sherry & Johnson, LLP 

1700 Two Logan Square 

18th and Arch Streets 

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2769 

Frank Marcone, Esquire 

127 Chester Pike 

Ridley Park, PA 19078 

Philip A. Charamella, Esquire 

Law Offices of Michael D. Fioretti 

The Bourse Building 

111 South Independence Mall East, Suite 790 

Philadelphia, PA 19106-2323 

 VAUGHAN, DUFFY & CONNORS, LLP 

 

 By: ________________________________ 

 Francis X. Nolan, Esquire, I.D. No. 09237 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

 102 Pickering Way, Suite 400 

 Exton, PA 19341 

Date: November 4, 2003 (610) 524-2100 

Case 2:02-cv-04388-JF Document 23-2 Filed 11/05/2003 Page 1 of 1
No. 49112.

#### Protest 581205-G of Samuels Hat Corporation (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record showed that the harvest hats in quest'on are similar to those involved in *Caradine*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 69, C. D. 664), the record in which case was admitted in evidence herein. In accordance therewith the claim at only 25 percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (5) was sustained.
EXHIBIT 31.2

CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Mark Gitter, certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of Wherify
Wireless, Inc;

      2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

      4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small
business issuer and have:

      a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared; and

      b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation.


Date: February 16, 2006

                                             /s/ Mark Gitter
                                             ----------------------------------
                                             Mark Gitter
                                             Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer
Before the First Division,

May 11, 1959

No. 63022.

#### Karl B. Rosen, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 58/1189, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is similar in all material respects to that the subject of *B. L. Lemke & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(39 Cust. Ct. 253, C.D. 1937), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification Pursuant to

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to

Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of
Husky Energy Inc. (the Company) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Asim Ghosh, President & Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date:March 8, 2011



|                                   
|-----------------------------------
|/s/ Asim Ghosh                     
|Asim Ghosh                         
|President & Chief Executive Officer
Case 2:05-cv-01099-ER Document 118-2 Filed 07/28/15 Page 1 of 8
Case 2:05-cv-01099-ER Document 118-2 Filed 07/28/15 Page 2 of 8
Case 2:05-cv-01099-ER Document 118-2 Filed 07/28/15 Page 3 of 8
Case 2:05-cv-01099-ER Document 118-2 Filed 07/28/15 Page 4 of 8
Case 2:05-cv-01099-ER Document 118-2 Filed 07/28/15 Page 5 of 8
Case 2:05-cv-01099-ER Document 118-2 Filed 07/28/15 Page 6 of 8
Case 2:05-cv-01099-ER Document 118-2 Filed 07/28/15 Page 7 of 8
Case 2:05-cv-01099-ER Document 118-2 Filed 07/28/15 Page 8 of 8
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 (UNAUDITED) AND THE
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
1998 (UNAUDITED) AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 
(B) FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                       349,496,258
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                           1,332,713,051
<CASH>                                      14,554,274
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                     127,981,918
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,502,853,002
<POLICY-LOSSES>                             19,831,500
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                    1,057,701,804
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    25,499,999
<OTHER-SE>                                 345,464,665
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             1,502,853,002
<PREMIUMS>                                  15,027,750
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                          9,666,181
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                           1,167,664
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<BENEFITS>                                   8,399,500
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                  5,162,175
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                         2,513,729
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              9,786,191
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          9,786,191
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 9,786,191
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.42
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>