alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 2:02-cv-20143-HB Document 20-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 1 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20143-HB Document 20-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 2 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20143-HB Document 20-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 3 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20143-HB Document 20-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 4 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20143-HB Document 20-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 5 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20143-HB Document 20-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 6 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20143-HB Document 20-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 7 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20143-HB Document 20-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 8 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20143-HB Document 20-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 9 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20143-HB Document 20-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 10 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20143-HB Document 20-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 11 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20143-HB Document 20-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 12 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20143-HB Document 20-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 13 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20143-HB Document 20-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 14 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20143-HB Document 20-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 15 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20143-HB Document 20-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 16 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20143-HB Document 20-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 17 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20143-HB Document 20-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 18 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20143-HB Document 20-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 19 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20143-HB Document 20-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 20 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20143-HB Document 20-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 21 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20143-HB Document 20-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 22 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20143-HB Document 20-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 23 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20143-HB Document 20-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 24 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20143-HB Document 20-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 25 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20143-HB Document 20-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 26 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20143-HB Document 20-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 27 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20143-HB Document 20-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 28 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20143-HB Document 20-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 29 of 29
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-35,247-02

EX P ARTE ROBERT EDWARD ATWOOD, Applicant

ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 92-12-1599-C CCR B IN THE 220TH DISTRICT COURT

F ROM COMA NCHE COUNTY

Per curiam . O R D E R Applicant pleade d g uilty to murder and was sentenc ed to forty y ear s’ imprisonment. Applicant did not appea l his conviction. Applicant filed this application for a writ of habea s corpus in the county of conviction, and the district c lerk forwa rded it to this Court. See T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07. I n the instant application, Applicant alleges that he is heale d of his addictions and mental instabilit y and no longe r belong s in prison, that his plea was involuntary due to the ineffe ctive assistance of counsel, and that his applicati o n for a writ of habea s corpus does not challeng e his conviction. Additionally , Applicant claims that he is being denied rele ase to parole due to a protest2

published ag ainst him on the internet. This Court has revie wed Appli cant’ s claim that he was denied rele ase to parole and has deter mined that it is without merit. There fore , it is denied. Applicant’s rema ining claims are barr ed from re view; as such, the y are dismiss ed. T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07 § 4.

Filed: Jul y

27, 2022 Do not publish
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

SYDNEY BRADSHAW : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. :

INS : NO. 02-4268

ORDER

AND NOW, this day of July, 2002, it appearing that petitioner has filed

a petition for Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. §2241, and

it further appearing that petitioner did not tender the required $5.00 filing fee, and, 

it further appearing that petitioner has not requested leave to proceed in forma

pauperis, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Clerk shall promptly furnish petitioner with the in forma

pauperis form, and petitioner shall either complete and return it to the Clerk of Court within

thirty (30) days, or in the alternative, tender the required $5.00 filing fee to the Clerk of Court

within thirty (30) days, or else this action will be dismissed.

 

CLIFFORD SCOTT GREEN, J.

Case 2:02-cv-04268-CG Document 2 Filed 07/19/2002 Page 1 of 1
No. 62495.

#### J. J. Boll *v.*United States,

protest 326894-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Since the protest was filed more than 60 days after liquidation, it was dismissed as untimely under section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

865 

CA 14-01786 

PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., PERADOTTO, SCONIERS, VALENTINO, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ. 

 

ALBERTO POLANCO, CLAIMANT-APPELLANT, 

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

STATE OF NEW YORK, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. 

(CLAIM NO. 123819.) 

 

ALBERTO POLANCO, CLAIMANT-APPELLANT PRO SE.

ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, ALBANY (LAURA ETLINGER OF

COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Court of Claims (Nicholas V. Midey,

Jr., J.), entered September 23, 2014. The order granted the motion of

defendant to dismiss the claim. 

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is

unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Claimant, a prisoner at the Auburn Correctional

Facility, commenced this action seeking damages based on the alleged

negligence of the “State Parole Board Employees [in] fail[ing] to

perform acts within the scope of their employment and in the discharge

of their official duties.” The Court of Claims granted defendant’s

motion to dismiss the claim on the grounds that it lacked subject

matter jurisdiction over the claim and that defendant is absolutely

immune from liability. We affirm. 

Contrary to claimant’s contention, “[r]egardless of how a claim

is characterized, one that requires, as a threshold matter, the review

of an administrative agency’s determination falls outside the subject

matter jurisdiction of the Court of Claims” (Green v State of New

York, 90 AD3d 1577, 1578, lv dismissed in part and denied in part 18

NY3d 901). “Although claimant characterized his claim as one for

money damages, upon our review of the record we conclude that

adjudication of his claim requires review of the underlying

administrative determination, over which the Court of Claims lacks

subject matter jurisdiction” (id. at 1578-1579). In any event, the

court also properly granted the motion based on absolute immunity. It

is well established that “[d]eterminations pertaining to parole and

its revocation . . . are deemed strictly sovereign and quasi-judicial

in nature and, accordingly, [defendant], in making such

determinations, is absolutely immune from tort liability” (Semkus v

State of New York, 272 AD2d 74, 75, lv denied 95 NY2d 761; see Arteaga
-2- 865 

CA 14-01786 

v State of New York, 72 NY2d 212, 217; Mertens v State of New York, 73

AD3d 1376, 1377, lv denied 15 NY3d 706). Here, “claimant has not

articulated any facts to support his claim that the [Parole Board

employees] acted in excess of their authority or in violation of any

relevant rules or regulations” (Loret v State of New York, 106 AD3d

1159, 1159, lv denied 22 NY3d 852; see Varela v State of New York, 283

AD2d 841, 841). 

Entered: July 2, 2015 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

: CIVIL ACTION NOS.

:

HAMMOND, et al. : 02-4409

GRESH, et al. : 02-4410

GEARINGER, SR. : 02-4411

BRASSILL : 02-4413

FYE : 02-4414

SEARFOSS : 02-4415

SMITH, et al. : 02-4416

MEYER, et al. : 02-4480

BINDER, et al. : 02-4658

BOULOUS : 02-4659

NEES, SR., et al. : 02-4730

WHELAN, et al. : 02-5164

MENTZER : 02-5165

MCELHINEY, et al. : 02-5317

DELGAUDIO, et al. : 02-5318

WAGNER, et al. : 02-5319

:

V. :

:

DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION :

et al. : :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of August, 2002, it is hereby

ORDERED that the above-captioned case or cases are referred to the Honorable

Charles R. Weiner for the purposes of the monitoring and the coordination of the status of

discovery, scheduling of arbitration hearings (if appropriate), settlement negotiations (if

appropriate), and scheduling trial dates (if appropriate), and it is further

ORDERED that the above-captioned case(s) shall remain on the calendar(s) of the

judge(s) to whom they were assigned at the time of filing, until further order of this court,

and, it is further 

Case 2:02-cv-04414-LDD Document 4 Filed 08/13/2002 Page 1 of 2
-2-

ORDERED that counsel for defendant(s) who filed a petition for removal of the

above-captioned case(s) to this court shall serve a copy of this Order on counsel for

plaintiff(s) in the above-captioned case(s), and, it is further

ORDERED that the relevant Prothonotaries of the Courts of Common Pleas

located within the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Eastern District 

of Pennsylvania that the above-captioned case or cases have been removed from shall

retain the original records in these matters, pending further Order of this court.

 

JAMES T. GILES, Ch.J.

Case 2:02-cv-04414-LDD Document 4 Filed 08/13/2002 Page 2 of 2
No. 54579.

#### Kittay & Blitz et al. *v.*United States,

protests 130736-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of synthetic stones the same in all material respects as those the subject of *S. Nathan & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(37 C. C. P. A. 99, C. A. D. 426), the claim at 10 percent under paragraph 1528 was sustained.
Exhibit 32.2





Statement of Chief Financial Officer Furnished


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





The undersigned, Gary F. Hoskins, is the Chief Financial Officer of Citizens South Banking Corporation (the “Company”).





This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the Company of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the “Report”).





By execution of this statement, I certify that to the best of my knowledge:





A)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and





B)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods covered by the Report.





May 13, 2011


/s/ Gary F. HoskinsDated


Gary F. HoskinsChief Financial Officer





This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  It is not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Citizens South Banking Corporation and will be retained by Citizens South Banking Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 53461.

petition 6698-R (Los Angeles).

#### E. E. Winters Co. (W. J. Byrnes & Co., Inc.) *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cline, J.

The petition was dismissed.
No. 57216.

protests 4215-K, etc. (New York).

#### Oscar Feldman, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion, by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the kidskin plates are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Kung Chen Fur Corpn.*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Ford, J., concurred.

Mollison, J., dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1480, *supra.*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Environmental Protection Agency

          - [FRL-11553-01-OA]

# AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

# ACTION:

Notice.

Notice is hereby given that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has determined that, in accordance with the provisions of the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), 5 U.S.C. app. 2., the Local Government Advisory Committee (LGAC) is in the public interest and is necessary in connection with the performance of EPA's duties. Accordingly, the LGAC will be renewed for an additional two-year period. The purpose of the LGAC is to provide advice and recommendations to EPA's Administrator on ways to improve its partnership with local governments and provide more efficient and effective environmental protection.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Paige Lieberman, Designated Federal Officer, LGAC, U.S. EPA, at (202) 564-9957/                        *LGAC@epa.gov.*

Dated: November 9, 2023.

Paige Lieberman, 

EPA Designated Federal Officer, Local Government Advisory Committee.

[FR Doc. 2023-25233 Filed 11-14-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 1SUPPLEMENT	&"Arial,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2023 ReportingSection VII

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2023-08	&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000DRAFT&K000000 VII VDR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout 4/20/23
Exhibit 32.1





Statement of Chief Executive Officer Furnished


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





The undersigned, Kim S. Price, is the President and Chief Executive Officer of Citizens South Banking Corporation (the “Company”).





This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the Company of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 (the “Report”).





By execution of this statement, I certify that to the best of my knowledge:





A)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and





B)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods covered by the Report.








May 13, 2011

/s/ Kim S. PriceDated

Kim S. PricePresident and Chief Executive Officer





This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  It is not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Citizens South Banking Corporation and will be retained by Citizens South Banking Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906


OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of BioAuthorize Holdings, Inc, (the “Company”)
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Jeffrey Perry,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








BIOAUTHORIZE HOLDINGS, INCDate: April 15, 2009
            By:
            /s/ Jeffrey PerryJeffrey PerryCFO





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906, an other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
by Section 906, has been provided to Company and will be retained by the Company
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
Exhibit  99.1:  Certification  Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mid-America  Capital  Partners,  L.P.
(the  "Partnership")  on Form 10-Q for the period ending  September 30, 2002, as
filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof  (the
"Report"),  I, H. Eric Bolton,  Jr.,  President and Chief  Executive  Officer of
Mid-America Apartment Communities,  Inc. certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350,
as adopted pursuant toss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Partnership.

Mid-America Capital Partners, L.P.
         By:  MAACP, Inc. (general partner)

         /s/H. Eric Bolton, Jr.
         ----------------------
         H. Eric Bolton, Jr.
         President and Chief Executive Officer
         November 14, 2002
Certificate  of  Amendment
Secretary  of  State
204  North  Carson  St.
Carson  City,  Nevada  89701-4299

Certificate  of  Amendment
Of  Articles  of  Incorporation
(Pursuant  to  NRS  78.385  and  78.390  After  Issuance  of  Stock)



1.  Name  of  Corporation
     New  Medium  Enterprises,  Inc.

2.  The  articles  have  been  amended  as  follows  (Provide article numbers if
available

     Article  FOURTH  of  the  hereby  amended  to  read  as  follows

    Fourth  (a)  The  corporation  shall  be  authorized  to issue the following
shares.

    Class          Number  of  Shares       Par  Value

Common             200,000,000              $0.0001
Preferred           10,000,000              $.00001

3.  The  voting  by  which  stockholders  holding  shares  in  the  corporation
entitling
them  to  exercise  at  least  a  majority  of  the voting power or such greater
proportion  of  the voting power as may be required in the case of a vote by the
classes  or  series  or  as may be required by the provisions of the Articles of
Incorporation  have  voted  in  favor  of  the  amendment  is  78%.

Effective  day  of  filing  7-26-04

Officers  Signature    Ethel  Schwartz

If  any  proposed amendment would alter or change any preference or any relative
or  other  right  given  to  any class or series of outstanding shares, then the
amendment  must  be  approved  by  the vote, in addition to the affirmative vote
otherwise  required  of  the  holders  of  shares representing a majority of the
voting  power  of  each  class or series affected by the amendment regardless of
limitations  or  restrictions  on  the  voting  power  thereof

IMPORTANT  Failure to include any of the above information and submit the proper
fees  may  cause  this  filing  to  be  rejected.


/s/  Nevada  Secretary  of  State
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of PG&E
National Energy Group, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2002, I, Thomas E.
Legro, Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of PG&E National
Energy Group, Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best
of my knowledge and belief, that:



| | (1) |  | such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of PG&E
National Energy Group, Inc.for the year ended December 31,
2002, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                     
| | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | the information contained in such Annual Report
on Form 10-K/A of PG&E National Energy Group, Inc. for the
year ended December 31, 2002, fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of PG&E National Energy Group, Inc..

| |  | /s/ THOMAS E. LEGRO                                                                  
| |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  |                                                                                      
| |  | THOMAS E. LEGRO                                                                      
| |  |                                                                                      
| |  | Vice President, Controller and Chief Accounting Officer
(principal financial officer)

March 12, 2003
1 The Court’s Order of July 28, 2004 denied Defendant HCI Direct’s (“HCI”)

Motion to Dismiss. HCI had argued that the Amended Complaint should be dismissed, because

Pro Se Plaintiff Martha Steele (“Steele”) had failed to effect service within the time limit

prescribed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). The Court held that she was entitled to have the Rule 4(m)

deadline extended since an extension of thirty-four days would not cause HCI undue prejudice.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MARTHA STEELE

v.

HCI DIRECT

:

: CIVIL ACTION

:

: NO. 02-4347

:

ORDER

AND NOW, this 9th day of December, 2004, upon consideration of Defendant’s

Motion for Reconsideration (docket no. 29), it is ORDERED that the motion is DENIED.1

BY THE COURT:

S/Bruce W. Kauffman

BRUCE W. KAUFFMAN, J.

Case 2:02-cv-04347-BWK Document 33 Filed 12/10/2004 Page 1 of 1