75636 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 232 / Thursday, December 3, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 

9A004 Space Launch Vehicles and 

‘‘Spacecraft,’’ ‘‘Spacecraft Buses,’’ 

‘‘Spacecraft Payloads,’’ ‘‘Spacecraft’’ Onboard Systems or Equipment, and Terrestrial 

Equipment, as Follows (see List of Items 

Controlled). 

License Requirements 

* * * * * 

License Requirements Note: 9A004.b 

through .f are controlled under ECCN 9A515. 

* * * * * 

List of Items Controlled 

Related Controls*** (3) See USML 

Categories IV for the space launch vehicles 

and XV for other spacecraft that are ‘‘subject 

to the ITAR’’ (see 22 CFR parts 120 through 

130). 

* * * * * 

■ 12. In Supplement No. 1 to part 774, 

Category 9, ECCN 9A010 is amended by: 

■ a. Revising the Heading; and 

■ b. Adding a Related Controls Note to 

the List of Items Controlled Section, to 

read as follows: 

9A010 ‘‘Specially Designed’’ ‘‘Parts,’’ 

‘‘Components,’’ Systems and Structures, for 

Launch Vehicles, Launch Vehicle Propulsion 

Systems or ‘‘Spacecraft’’. (See Related 

Controls paragraph.) 

List of Items Controlled 

Related Controls: (1) See USML Category 

IV of the International Traffic in Arms 

Regulations (ITAR) (22 CFR parts 120 

through 130) and ECCN 9A604 for 

paragraphs 9A010.a, .b and .d. (2) See USML 

Category XV of the ITAR and ECCN 9A515 

for paragraph 9A010.c. (3) See Supplement 

No. 4 to part 774, Order of Review for 

guidance on the process for determining 

classification of items. 

* * * * * 

Dated: November 23, 2015. 

Kevin J. Wolf, 

Assistant Secretary for Export 

Administration. 

[FR Doc. 2015–30253 Filed 12–2–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–33–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND 

SECURITY 

Coast Guard 

33 CFR Part 117 

[Docket No. USCG–2015–1019] 

Drawbridge Operation Regulation; 

English Kills, New York City, NY 

AGENCY: Coast Guard, DHS. 

ACTION: Notice of deviation from 

drawbridge regulation. 

SUMMARY: The Coast Guard has issued a 

temporary deviation from the operating 

schedule that governs the Metropolitan 

Avenue Bridge across the English Kills, 

mile 3.4, at New York City, New York. 

This deviation is necessary to perform 

operating machinery installation. This 

deviation allows the bridge to remain in 

the closed position for approximately 3 

days. 

DATES: This deviation is effective from 

6 a.m. on December 7, 2015 to 5 p.m. 

on December 10, 2015. 

ADDRESSES: The docket for this 

deviation, [USCG–2015–1019] is 

available at http://www.regulations.gov. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: If 

you have questions on this temporary 

deviation, call or email Ms. Judy K. 

Leung-Yee, Project Officer, First Coast 

Guard District, telephone (212) 514– 

4330, email judy.k.leung-yee@uscg.mil. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: New York 

City DOT requested this temporary 

deviation from the normal operating 

schedule to perform operating 

machinery installation. 

The Metropolitan Avenue Bridge, 

mile 3.4, across the English Kills has a 

vertical clearance in the closed position 

of 10 feet at mean high water and 15 feet 

at mean low water. The existing bridge 

operating regulations are found at 33 

CFR 117.801(e). 

The waterway has one commercial 

facility located upstream of the bridge. 

Under this temporary deviation, the 

Metropolitan Avenue Bridge may 

remain in the closed position from 6 

a.m. on December 7, 2015 through 5 

p.m. on December 10, 2015. 

Vessels able to pass through the 

bridge in the closed positions may do so 

at any time. The bridge will not be able 

to open for emergencies and there is no 

immediate alternate route for vessel to 

pass. 

The Coast Guard will also inform the 

users of the waterways through our 

Local and Broadcast Notice to Mariners 

of the change in operating schedule for 

the bridge so that vessels can arrange 

their transits to minimize any impact 

caused by the temporary deviation. 

In accordance with 33 CFR 117.35(e), 

the drawbridge must return to its regular 

operating schedule immediately at the 

end of the effective period of this 

temporary deviation. This deviation 

from the operating regulations is 

authorized under 33 CFR 117.35. 

Dated: November 18, 2015. 

C.J. Bisignano, 

Supervisory Bridge Management Specialist, 

First Coast Guard District. 

[FR Doc. 2015–30587 Filed 12–2–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 9110–04–P 

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 

AGENCY 

40 CFR Part 52 

[EPA–R06–OAR–2012–0400; FRL–9939–47– 

Region 6] 

Approval and Promulgation of 

Implementation Plans; New Mexico; 

Albuquerque-Bernalillo County; 

Infrastructure and Interstate Transport 

State Implementation Plan for the 2008 

Lead National Ambient Air Quality 

Standards 

AGENCY: Environmental Protection 

Agency (EPA). 

ACTION: Final rule. 

SUMMARY: EPA is approving a State 

Implementation Plan (SIP) submission 

from the Governor of New Mexico for 

the City of Albuquerque-Bernalillo 

County for the 2008 Lead (Pb) National 

Ambient Air Quality Standards 

(NAAQS). The submittal addresses how 

the existing SIP provides for 

implementation, maintenance, and 

enforcement of the 2008 Pb NAAQS 

(infrastructure SIP or i-SIP). This i-SIP 

ensures that the State’s SIP for 

Albuquerque-Bernalillo County is 

adequate to meet the state’s 

responsibilities under the Federal Clean 

Air Act (CAA or Act), including the four 

CAA requirements for interstate 

transport of Pb emissions. 

DATES: This final rule is effective on 

January 4, 2016. 

ADDRESSES: EPA has established a 

docket for this action under Docket ID 

No. EPA–R06–OAR–2012–0400. All 

documents in the docket are listed on 

the http://www.regulations.gov Web 

site. Although listed in the index, some 

information is not publicly available, 

e.g., Confidential Business Information 

or other information whose disclosure is 

restricted by statute. Certain other 

material, such as copyrighted material, 

is not placed on the Internet and will be 

publicly available only in hard copy 

form. Publicly available docket 

materials are available either 

electronically through http://

www.regulations.gov or in hard copy at 

EPA Region 6, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 

700, Dallas, Texas 75202–2733. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Tracie Donaldson, 214–665–6633, 

donaldson.tracie@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Throughout this document wherever 

‘‘we’’, ‘‘us’’, or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean 

the EPA. 

I. Background 

The background for this action is 

discussed in detail in our September 11, 


Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 232 / Thursday, December 3, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 75637 

2015, proposal (80 FR 54739). In that 

document, we proposed that the 

Albuquerque-Bernalillo County New 

Mexico i-SIP submittal for the 2008 Pb 

NAAQS met the requirements for an iSIP, including the requirements for 

interstate transport of Pb emissions. 

This action is being taken under section 

110 of the Act. We did not receive any 

comments regarding our proposed 

approval. 

II. Final Action 

We are approving the May 2, 2012, iSIP submission from AlbuquerqueBernalillo County New Mexico, which 

addresses the requirements of CAA 

sections 110(a)(1) and (2) as applicable 

to the 2008 Pb NAAQS. Specifically, we 

are approving the following 

infrastructure elements: 110(a)(2)(A), 

(B), (C), (D), (E), (F), (G), (H), (J), (K), (L) 

and (M). We are also approving the 

Albuquerque-Bernalillo County’s 

demonstration that it meets the four 

statutory requirements for interstate 

transport of Pb emissions. 

III. Statutory and Executive Order 

Reviews 

Under the CAA, the Administrator is 

required to approve a SIP submission 

that complies with the provisions of the 

Act and applicable Federal regulations. 

42 U.S.C. 7410(k); 40 CFR 52.02(a). 

Thus, in reviewing SIP submissions, 

EPA’s role is to approve state choices, 

provided that they meet the criteria of 

the CAA. Accordingly, this action 

merely approves state law as meeting 

Federal requirements and does not 

impose additional requirements beyond 

those imposed by state law. For that 

reason, this action: 

• Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ subject to review by the Office 

of Management and Budget under 

Executive Orders 12866 (58 FR 51735, 

October 4, 1993) and 13563 (76 FR 3821, 

January 21, 2011); 

• Does not impose an information 

collection burden under the provisions 

of the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 

U.S.C. 3501 et seq.); 

• Is certified as not having a 

significant economic impact on a 

substantial number of small entities 

under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 

U.S.C. 601 et seq.); 

• Does not contain any unfunded 

mandate or significantly or uniquely 

affect small governments, as described 

in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act 

of 1995 (Pub. L. 104–4); 

• Does not have Federalism 

implications as specified in Executive 

Order 13132 (64 FR 43255, August 10, 

1999); 

• Is not an economically significant 

regulatory action based on health or 

safety risks subject to Executive Order 

13045 (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997); 

• Is not a significant regulatory action 

subject to Executive Order 13211 (66 FR 

28355, May 22, 2001); 

• Is not subject to requirements of 

section 12(d) of the National 

Technology Transfer and Advancement 

Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) because 

application of those requirements would 

be inconsistent with the Clean Air Act; 

and 

• Does not provide EPA with the 

discretionary authority to address, as 

appropriate, disproportionate human 

health or environmental effects, using 

practicable and legally permissible 

methods, under Executive Order 12898 

(59 FR 7629, February 16, 1994). 

In addition, the SIP is not approved 

to apply on any Indian reservation land 

or in any other area where EPA or an 

Indian tribe has demonstrated that a 

tribe has jurisdiction. In those areas of 

Indian country, the rule does not have 

tribal implications and will not impose 

substantial direct costs on tribal 

governments or preempt tribal law as 

specified by Executive Order 13175 (65 

FR 67249, November 9, 2000). 

The Congressional Review Act, 5 

U.S.C. 801 et seq., as added by the Small 

Business Regulatory Enforcement 

Fairness Act of 1996, generally provides 

that before a rule may take effect, the 

agency promulgating the rule must 

submit a rule report, which includes a 

copy of the rule, to each House of the 

Congress and to the Comptroller General 

of the United States. EPA will submit a 

report containing this action and other 

required information to the U.S. Senate, 

the U.S. House of Representatives, and 

the Comptroller General of the United 

States prior to publication of the rule in 

the Federal Register. A major rule 

cannot take effect until 60 days after it 

is published in the Federal Register. 

This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as 

defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2). 

Under section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, 

petitions for judicial review of this 

action must be filed in the United States 

Court of Appeals for the appropriate 

circuit by February 1, 2016. Filing a 

petition for reconsideration by the 

Administrator of this final rule does not 

affect the finality of this action for the 

purposed of judicial review nor does it 

extend the time within which a petition 

for judicial review may be filed, and 

shall not postpone the effectiveness of 

such rule or action. This action may not 

be challenged later in proceedings to 

enforce its requirements. (See section 

307(b)(2)). 

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 

Environmental protection, Air 

pollution control, Incorporation by 

reference, Intergovernmental relations, 

Lead, Reporting and recordkeeping 

requirements. 

Dated: November 17, 2015. 

Ron Curry, 

Regional Administrator, Region 6. 

40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows: 

PART 52—APPROVAL AND 

PROMULGATION OF 

IMPLEMENTATION PLANS 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 52 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Subpart GG—New Mexico 

■ 2. In § 52.1620(e), the second table 

entitled ‘‘EPA Approved Nonregulatory 

Provisions and Quasi-Regulatory 

Measures in the New Mexico SIP’’ is 

amended by adding an entry at the end 

of the table to read as follows: 

§ 52.1620 Identification of plan. 

* * * * * 

(e) * * * 


Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES
75638 Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 232 / Thursday, December 3, 2015 / Rules and Regulations 

EPA APPROVED NONREGULATORY PROVISIONS AND QUASI-REGULATORY MEASURES IN THE NEW MEXICO SIP 

Name of SIP provision Applicable geographic or 

nonattainment area 

State 

submittal/ 

effective 

date 

EPA approval date Explanation 

*******

Infrastructure and Interstate 

Transport for the 2008 Pb 

NAAQS.

Albuquerque-Bernalillo County.5/2/2012 12/3/2015, [insert Federal 

Register citation].

[FR Doc. 2015–30541 Filed 12–2–15; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 


Lhorne on DSK5TPTVN1PROD with RULES