alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2023094EN.01003201.xml

| 13.3.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/32

---

Judgment of the General Court of 25 January 2023 — GEA Group v Commission

(Case T-640/16 RENV) (1)

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - European markets for tin-based heat stabilisers and for heat stabilisers with epoxidised soybean oil and esters as their base - Application of the ceiling of 10 % of turnover to one of the entities forming the undertaking - Annulment of the decision amending the fine imposed in the initial infringement decision - Admissibility - Interest in bringing proceedings - Fines - Limitation period - Concept of an ‘undertaking’ - Joint and several liability for payment of the fine - Rights of the defence - Right to a hearing - Equal treatment - Date by which the fine is payable in the event of amendment - Statement of reasons)

(2023/C 94/34)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: GEA Group AG (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: I. du Mont and C. Wagner, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Rossi, V. Bottka and T. Baumé, acting as Agents)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of Commission Decision C(2016) 3920 final of 29 June 2016 amending Decision C(2009) 8682 final of 11 November 2009 relating to a proceeding under Article [101 TFEU] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (AT.38589 — Heat stabilisers).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders GEA Group AG to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission in the proceedings T-640/16, T-640/16 RENV and C-823/18 P. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders GEA Group AG to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission in the proceedings T-640/16, T-640/16 RENV and C-823/18 P.

---

(1)  OJ C 392, 24.10.2016.

---
No. 51615.

#### Protests 51639-K, etc., of Continental Ceramics Corp. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of oatmeals or oatmeal saucers and chowder cups or puree cups the same in all material respects as those passed upon in *Copeland & Thompson, Inc.*v. *United States*(12 Cust. Ct. 85, C. D. 833), and *Johnson Bros.*v. *United States*(15 id. 113, C. D. 955). In accordance therewith the merchandise was held dutiable as claimed.
No. 51921.

#### Kenney Mfg. Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 18752-K, etc. (Providence, etc.)

*140Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Privacy Act – A Privacy Act Statement required by 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3) stating our authority for 

soliciting and collecting the information from your check, and explaining the purposes and routine 

uses which will be made of your check information, is available from the Federal Register at: 

(https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2003/02/04/03-2521/privacy-act-of-1974-as-amendedsystem-of-records), or by calling toll free at (1-866-945-7920) to obtain a copy by mail. Furnishing 

the check information is voluntary, but a decision not to do so may require you to make payment 

by some other method.

Notice to Customers Presenting Checks

When you provide a check as payment, you authorize us either to use information from your 

check to make a one-time electronic fund transfer from your account or to process the payment 

as a check transaction.
March 10, 2015 

VIA HAND DELIVERY 

Michael A. Kunz, Esquire 

Clerk of Court- USDC/EDPA 

U.S. District Court - Eastern District of PA 

James A. Byrne Courthouse 

601 Market Street 

Philadelphia, PA 19106-1797 

Re: Constand v. Cosby 

Civil Action No.: 05-cv-01099-ER 

Dear Mr. Kunz: 

BY 

I COZEN 

\.._)O'CONNOR 

George M. Gowen 

Direct Phone 215-665-278 l 

Direct Fax 215-989-417 4 

ggowen@cozen.com 

Our firm represents William H. Cosby, Jr. in this matter. We received the Court's January 12, 

2015 notice of the potential unsealing of certain discovery motions, pursuant to Rule 5.1.5 of the 

Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Mr. Cosby hereby provides notice that he does object to the 

unsealing of the documents at issue. Given his objection, we understand that the matter will be 

determined by the Court, in accordance with the Local Rule 5.1.5. This is a complex matter, 

involving important and legitimate privacy issues, and is governed by Leucadia, Inc. v. Applied 

Extrusion Technologies, Inc., 998 F.2d 157 (3d Cir. 1993). Mr. Cosby requests that the Court 

provide a briefing schedule, so that he and any other interested parties may be heard. 

Respectfully, 

COZEN O'CONNOR 

r1/ 71; /&.:,_ /,-~-£?774t· ////f/lk/l11 

By: ~orge M. Gowen 

GMG/laa 

cc (via e-mail): Bebe H. Kivitz, Esq.(bkivitz@jskhlaw.com) 

Ann C. Lebowitz, Esq. (acl@alebowitz.com) 

Dolores M. Trioiani, Esq.(dmt@tglawoffice.com) 

Jennifer B. Jordan, Esq. (jjordan@morganlewis.com) 

Paul D. Weller, Esq.(pweller@morganlewis.com) 

B. Joyce Thompson Dale, Esq. (delcowarjd@aol.com) 

Patrick J. O'Connor, Esq. (poconnor@cozen.com) 

LEGAL \21911103\1 00601.1600.000/163503.000 

1900 Market Street Philadelphia, PA 19103 

215.665.2000 800.523.2900 215.665.2013 Fax cozen.com 

Case 2:05-cv-01099-ER Document 98 Filed 03/11/15 Page 1 of 1
# C_2017239EN.01001901.xml

| 24.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 239/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 239/19

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Sicilia (Italy) lodged on 23 November 2016 — Emmea Srl and Commercial Hub Srl v Comune di Siracusa and Others

(Case C-595/16)

(2017/C 239/25)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Sicilia

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Emmea Srl and Commercial Hub Srl

Applicants:

Defendants: Comune di Siracusa, Assessorato delle Attività Produttive per la Regione Siciliana, Libera Consorzio Comunale (formerly Provincia) di Siracusa, and Camera di Commercio di Siracusa

Defendants:

By order of 27 April 2017, the Court (Tenth Chamber) declared that the request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per la Sicilia, made by order of 20 October 2016, is manifestly inadmissible.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001052971
<NAME>                        IHLLC
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         15,608
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  81,140
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    256,913
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               358,167
<PP&E>                                         99,628
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 885,592
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          437,660
<BONDS>                                        200,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     16,339
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   885,592
<SALES>                                        596,160
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               596,160
<CGS>                                          494,656
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  579,334
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (722)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             21,046
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,690)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1,250
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,940)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,940)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.1
 
 Statement of Chief Executive Officer Furnished
 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 The undersigned, Kim S. Price, is the President and Chief Executive Officer of Citizens South Banking Corporation (the “Company”).
 
 This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the Company of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 (the “Report”).
 
 By execution of this statement, I certify that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 A)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and
 
 B)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods covered by the Report.
   August 13, 2010

/s/ Kim S. PriceDated

Kim S. PricePresident and Chief Executive Officer
    This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  It is not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Citizens South Banking Corporation and will be retained by Citizens South Banking Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2016200EN.01000801.xml

| 6.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 200/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 200/8

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Gerechtshof Amsterdam (Netherlands) lodged on 14 March 2016 — Aramex Nederland BV v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Douane

(Case C-145/16)

(2016/C 200/12)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Gerechtshof Amsterdam

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Aramex Nederland BV

Applicant:

Defendant: Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Douane

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Is Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 301/2012 of 2 April 2012 (1) concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature valid?

1

---

(1)  OJ 2012 L 99, p. 19.

1

---
|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                             |                                                    |                               |
|----------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------|
| February                19, 2008 |                                                         | /s/                Vincent Sheeran |
|                             | Vincent                Sheeran, Chief Executive Officer |
|                             | (Principal                Executive Officer)            |

*This      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not deemed filed by the Company*
*and      is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under      the      Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made      before or after the date of the Report), irrespective of any general      incorporation language contained in such filing*
*.*

----
##### 



EXHIBIT 99 (a)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of Northland Cable
Television, Inc. and Subsidiary (the Company) on Form 10Q/A for the
period ended September 30, 2001 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q/A), I, John Whetzell,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that;

| |  |                                                                                                                                                             
| |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | (1) The Form 10-Q/A fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 (a) or (15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m or 78(d)); and   
|
| |  | (2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q/A fairly presents in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Dated: November 8, 2002

| |  |     |  |                                         
| |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------
| |  | BY: |  | /s/ JOHN S. WHETZELL                    
| |  |     |  |                                         
| |  |     |  | John S. Whetzell
Chief Executive Officer
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 81 Filed 06/20/2006 Page 1 of 14
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 81 Filed 06/20/2006 Page 2 of 14
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 81 Filed 06/20/2006 Page 3 of 14
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 81 Filed 06/20/2006 Page 4 of 14
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 81 Filed 06/20/2006 Page 5 of 14
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 81 Filed 06/20/2006 Page 6 of 14
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 81 Filed 06/20/2006 Page 7 of 14
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 81 Filed 06/20/2006 Page 8 of 14
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 81 Filed 06/20/2006 Page 9 of 14
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 81 Filed 06/20/2006 Page 10 of 14
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 81 Filed 06/20/2006 Page 11 of 14
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 81 Filed 06/20/2006 Page 12 of 14
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 81 Filed 06/20/2006 Page 13 of 14
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 81 Filed 06/20/2006 Page 14 of 14
2008 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

7-15-2008

Toledo Mack Sales v. Mack Trucks Inc

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Precedential

Docket No. 07-1811

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2008

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2008 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"Toledo Mack Sales v. Mack Trucks Inc" (2008). 2008 Decisions. Paper 760.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2008/760
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

_______________

No: 07-1811

_______________

TOLEDO MACK SALES & SERVICE, INC.,

 Appellant

 v.

MACK TRUCKS, INC.

_______________

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

(D.C. No. 02-cv-4373)

District Judge: Honorable Ronald L. Buckwalter

_______________

Argued March 5, 2008 

Before: BARRY, JORDAN, and HARDIMAN, Circuit Judges.

Filed: July 15, 2008

_______________

ORDER AMENDING OPINION

_______________

JORDAN, Circuit Judge, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDER that the Precedential Opinion in the above case, filed

June 17, 2008, is hereby amended as follows: 

At page 29, lines 15 and 21, the word “Monsanto” shall be deleted and

replaced with “Matsushita”. 
2

This amendment does not change the date of filing, June 17, 2008.

By the Court, 

 /s/ Kent A. Jordan 

Circuit Judge 

DATE: July 15, 2008

smw/cc: Robert L. Byer, Esq.

David A. Degnan, Esq.

Wayne A. Mack, Jr., Esq.

James M. Parks, Esq.

James H. Steigerwald, Esq

Barbara W. Mather, Esq.
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Brian T. Marley, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Belk, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or causedsuch internal control over financial reporting to be designed under oursupervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability offinancial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.Date: December 8, 2005     /s/ Brian T. Marley    Brian T. Marley    Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
No. 52197.

protests 131162-K, etc. (New York).

#### Nylos Trading Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the issues and facts herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the quantities reported by the inspector as not landed were not in fact landed. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited it was held that the quantities reported by the inspector as not landed are subject to an allowance in duties as claimed. The protest was sustained to this extent.
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1414 

To state the policy of the United States on the minimum number of available 

battle force ships. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 22, 2017 

Mr. WICKER (for himself, Mrs. SHAHEEN, Mr. KAINE, Mr. KING, Mr. 

BLUMENTHAL, Mr. TILLIS, Mr. COCHRAN, Mr. STRANGE, Ms. COLLINS, 

Mr. INHOFE, Mr. PERDUE, Mr. COTTON, Mr. ROUNDS, Mr. SULLIVAN, 

Ms. HIRONO, Mr. ROBERTS, and Mr. RUBIO) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To state the policy of the United States on the minimum 

number of available battle force ships. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Securing the Home5 land by Increasing our Power on the Seas Act’’ or 

6 ‘‘SHIPS Act’’. 


SSpencer on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1414 IS

1 SEC. 2. POLICY OF THE UNITED STATES ON MINIMUM NUM2 BER OF BATTLE FORCE SHIPS. 

3 It shall be the policy of the United States to have 

4 available, as soon as practicable, not fewer than 355 battle 

5 force ships, comprised of the optimal mix of platforms, 

6 with funding subject to the annual authorization of appro7 priation and the annual appropriation of funds. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 106-2 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 106-2 Filed 09/01/2006 Page 2 of 2