alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT 

No. 08-1857

In Re: RAKIM ROYSTER, 

 Petitioner. 

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. 

(5:08-hc-02079-D) 

Submitted: December 16, 2008 Decided: December 19, 2008 

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. 

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Rakim Royster, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 
2 

PER CURIAM: 

Rakim Royster petitions for a writ of mandamus, 

alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 

U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. He seeks an order from this 

court directing the district court to act. We find there has 

been no undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, 

although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we deny 

the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because 

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before the court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

PETITION DENIED
No. 67803.

#### Abercrombie & Fitch Co. *v.*United States,

protests 58/24070, 59/16974, and 59/27773 (New York).

*325Opinion by

Ford, ,T.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of wearing apparel, composed of a synthetic textile material, similar in use to silk knit outerwear and following *United States*v. *Steinberg Bros.*(47 CCPA 47, C.A.D. 727), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 50338.

#### Protests 973091-G, etc., of Nathan Berlin et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It was stipulated that the goatskins are similar in all* material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Winograd Bros.*(32 C. C. P. A. 153, C. A. D. 302), which record was admitted in evidence herein. In accordance therewith the claim for free entry .under paragraph 1681 was sustained.
# C_2015328EN.01000902.xml

| 5.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 328/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 328/9

---

Action brought on 22 June 2015 — DIMA Verwaltungs v OHIM (Shape of a container)

(Case T-326/15)

(2015/C 328/08)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: DIMA Verwaltungs GmbH (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: T. Kerkhoff, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Trade mark at issue: Three-dimensional Community trade mark (Shape of a container) — Application for registration No 12 649 174

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 20 April 2015 in Case R 2567/2014-5

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order the defendant to resume the registration procedure; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to resume the registration procedure;

| — | in the alternative, declare that Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 does not preclude the registration and refer the case back to the Board of Appeal; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, declare that Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 does not preclude the registration and refer the case back to the Board of Appeal;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

__________________________________________

:

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA :

: CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 05-363-6

v. : 

: CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-986

DAVID CALHOUN, :

Defendant. :

__________________________________________:

ORDER

AND NOW, this 28th day of June 2012, upon consideration of Defendant David

Calhoun’s pro se Motion for a New Trial Pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33

(Doc. No. 403), his Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct his Sentence Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

2255 (Doc. No. 439), and all briefs, supplemental briefs, declarations and exhibits filed in

support of and in opposition thereto; after a careful review of the transcripts and all evidence and

documents of record in this case; and for the reasons stated in the Opinion filed this day, it is

hereby ORDERED as follows:

1. Defendant’s Motion for a New Trial Pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal

Procedure 33 (Doc. No. 403) is DENIED.

2. The Court RESERVES RULING on Defendant’s Motion to Vacate, Set Aside,

or Correct his Sentence Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc. No. 439) to the extent it challenges

the use of shackles during the preliminary stage of jury selection, but DENIES the Motion in all

other respects. Within twenty-one (21) days of the date of this Order the Government shall

submit any affidavits or other record evidence pertaining to the use of shackles in this case. The

Court will set a date and time for an evidentiary hearing by separate order and will require the

presence of counsel who were present before and during jury selection on April 17, 2006.

Case 2:05-cr-00363-CMR Document 487 Filed 06/28/12 Page 1 of 2
3. Upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion to File Signed Declaration in Relation

to the Government’s Newly Released Evidence (Doc. No. 473), it is hereby ORDERED that the

Motion is GRANTED. The declaration and supporting exhibits attached to Defendant’s Motion

are deemed filed as of the date of the Motion. The Court has considered these documents in

ruling on the § 2255 Motion.

4. Upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion to Seal (Doc. No. 477), it is hereby

ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED without prejudice.

1

5. Defendant’s outstanding discovery motions (Doc. Nos. 422, 425, 426, 475) are

DISMISSED as moot.

It is so ORDERED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Cynthia M. Rufe

________________________

CYNTHIA M. RUFE, J.

In his Motion, Defendant asserts: “In light of this Court having granted the Government’s motion to seal

1

the prior documents, Movant is obliged to respect the Government’s position and this Court’s mandate,” and file the

document under seal. While the Court appreciates Defendant’s attempt to comply with Court’s prior order,

Defendant’s “Notice of Receipt of Government’s Response” does not contain information that was the subject of the

Court’s prior sealing order.

Case 2:05-cr-00363-CMR Document 487 Filed 06/28/12 Page 2 of 2
Before the Second Division,

April 8, 1960

No. 64062.

protests 58/10514, etc. (Galveston).

#### Jacob Holm & Sons, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

*419Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of loosely twisted ropelike material the same in all material respects as that the subject of *General Twine Corp.*v. *United States*(42 Cust. Ct. 121, C.D. 2075), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 182 (Friday, September 19, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 56345]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-22457]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE: Wednesday September 24, 2014, 10 a.m.-12 p.m.

PLACE: Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, 
Bethesda, Maryland.

STATUS: Commission Meeting--Open to the Public

Matter To Be Considered: Decisional Matter: Safety Standard for Magnet 
Sets--Final Rule
    A live Web cast of the meeting can be viewed at www.cpsc.gov/live.
    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-7948.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

    Dated: September 16, 2014.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretariat.
[FR Doc. 2014-22457 Filed 9-17-14; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

SOTERO SANCHEZ : CIVIL ACTION

:

 v. :

:

FRANCIS TENNIS, et al. : NO. 05-2805

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of , 2006, after careful and independent

consideration of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus, the District Attorney’s response to the

petition and after review of the Report and Recommendation of Charles B. Smith, United States

Magistrate Judge, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED; 

2. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DENIED; and

3. A certificate of appealability is not granted.

BY THE COURT:

 

JOHN R. PADOVA J.

Case 2:05-cv-02805-JP Document 11 Filed 05/02/06 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit
      32.2**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Independence Lead Mines Company (the
      "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended December 31, 2007, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      I, Wayne L. Schoonmaker, Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition, and results of operations of the
                Company.





The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to
      be
      incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before
      or
      after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in
      such
      filing.





/s/
      Wayne L. Schoonmaker


Principal
      Accounting Officer





Dated:
      September 24, 2008
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1432 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1432

  To prevent the Federal Aviation Administration's Aircraft Registry 
           Office from closing during a Government shutdown.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 26, 2017

 Mr. Inhofe (for himself and Mr. Moran) introduced the following bill; 
    which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To prevent the Federal Aviation Administration's Aircraft Registry 
           Office from closing during a Government shutdown.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. AIRCRAFT REGISTRY OFFICE.

    The Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration shall 
designate employees at the Aircraft Registry Office in Oklahoma City, 
Oklahoma, as excepted employees in the event of a shutdown or emergency 
furlough to ensure that the office remains open for the duration of the 
lapse in Federal Government appropriations to the Federal Aviation 
Administration.
                                 <all>
```
Case 2:02-cv-02761-RBS     Document 4-4      Filed 06/27/2002     Page 1 of 5

Case 2:02-cv-02761-RBS     Document 4-4      Filed 06/27/2002     Page 2 of 5

Case 2:02-cv-02761-RBS     Document 4-4      Filed 06/27/2002     Page 3 of 5

Case 2:02-cv-02761-RBS     Document 4-4      Filed 06/27/2002     Page 4 of 5

Case 2:02-cv-02761-RBS     Document 4-4      Filed 06/27/2002     Page 5 of 5
#### Adam LOPEZ-MENDOZA, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. Elias SANDOVAL-SANCHEZ, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

Nos. 79-7673, 80-7189.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

July 27, 1984.

Mary L. Heen, American Civil Liberties Union, New York City, Douglas P. Haffer, San Francisco, Cal., for Mendoza.

John E. Huerta, Mexican American Legal Defense & Educational Fund, Los Angeles, Cal., for Sanchez.

Karen Morrisette, Washington, D.C., James P. Morris, Atty., Dept, of Justice, Margaret J. Perry, Washington, D.C., for respondent.

Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, WRIGHT, GOODWIN, WALLACE, HUG, FLETCHER, ALARCON, POOLE, CAN-BY, NORRIS and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

By Order filed July 21, 1981, a majority of the full court ordered these cases reheard en banc pursuant to this Court’s Rule 25. The previous three-judge panel assignments were withdrawn.

These eases were taken en banc solely to consider whether application of the exclusionary rule should be extended to deportation proceedings. Subsequently, the United States Supreme Court reversed the decision of the en banc court in an opinion dated July 5, 1984, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 3479, 82 L.Ed.2d 778.

These cases are remanded to their respective three-judge panels for resolution in light of the opinion of the Supreme Court.
```

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 213 (Monday, November 6, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 76266]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-24636]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 2:00 p.m. on Thursday, November 9, 2023.

PLACE: The meeting will be held via remote means and/or at the 
Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.

STATUS: This meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, 
the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend 
the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the 
matters also may be present.
    In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting 
changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, 
and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's website 
at https://www.sec.gov.
    The General Counsel of the Commission, or her designee, has 
certified that, in her opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth 
in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 
200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), (a)(8), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10), 
permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.
    The subject matter of the closed meeting will consist of the 
following topics:
    Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;
    Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;
    Resolution of litigation claims; and
    Other matters relating to examinations and enforcement proceedings.
    At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in 
the scheduling of meeting agenda items that may consist of 
adjudicatory, examination, litigation, or regulatory matters.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: For further information; please 
contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 
551-5400.
    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.

    Dated: November 2, 2023.
J. Lynn Taylor,
Assistant Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-24636 Filed 11-2-23; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
```
Part 1

SUPPLEMENT

Fiscal Year 2015 Reporting

Section V

Bulletin No. 2015-XX DRAFT BS - V - 1

IRC Handouts 8-6-15

Line

No.

USSGL

Acct. USSGL Account Title Begin/End Fed/NonFed Reporting Type Code Addl. Info.

17 214000 Accrued Interest Payable - Not Otherwise Classified E F/G E/U

32 633000 Other Interest Expenses E F/G/N/Z E

33 633000 Other Interest Expenses E F/G/N/Z U

USSGL Crosswalk - Balance Sheet

Liabilities With the Public

Assets With the Public
Part 1

SUPPLEMENT

Fiscal Year 2015 Reporting

Section V

Bulletin No. 2015-XX DRAFT BS - V - 2

IRC Handouts 8-6-15

Footnotes and Additional Information

1. Use USSGL proprietary account attribute domain values as provided in USSGL Section IV, page 4.

2. Related to Government Account Series securities purchased using deposit funds. The Fed/Nonfed attribute 

domain value of Z was added to TFM 2-4700 in order to be able to correctly classify any Government Account 

Series securities reported to this USSGL account. The amounts are reported to a Federal line on the Reclassified 

Balance Sheet in accordance with Section 4705.20e. On the Balance Sheet this domain value would be reported on 

a Non-Federal line.

3. FASAB recognizes amounts returned to Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands as non-federal custodial 

liabilities as referenced in FASAB SFFAS No. 7, paragraph 289.

4. The Fed/Nonfed attribute domain value of Z was added to TFM 2-4700 in order to be able to correctly classify 

any Government Account Series securities reported to this USSGL account. The amounts are reported to a Federal 

line on the Reclassified Balance Sheet in accordance with Section 4705.20e. On the Balance Sheet this domain 

value would be reported on a Non-Federal line.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Championship Auto Racing Teams, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ending June 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Christopher R. Pook, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Christopher R. Pook

Christopher R. Pook
Chief Executive Officer
August 12, 2005

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Championship Auto Racing Teams, Inc. and will be retained by
Championship Auto Racing Teams, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


                                       24
No. 59964.

#### Kurt Orban Company, Inc., and Anthony B. Bowers *v.*United States,

protest 259307-K/14446 (New Orleans).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of steel in strips, more than five one-hundredths of 1 inch in thickness and less than one-quarter of 1 inch in thickness and less than 16 inches in width, the same in all material respects as that involved in Abstract 58580, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 58916.

protest 198636-K (New York).

#### Arista Oil Products Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is, in fact, crude sperm oil and that merchandise of like character is now being classified at *l}{*cents per pound under paragraph 52, as modified, *supra,*the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 222 (Monday, November 20, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 80764]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-25614]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE

Antitrust Division


Notice Pursuant to the National Cooperative Research and 
Production Act of 1993--Consortium for Battery Innovation

    Notice is hereby given that, on September 6, 2023, pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 
1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301 et seq. (``the Act''), Consortium for Battery 
Innovation (``CBI'') has filed written notifications simultaneously 
with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing 
changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose 
of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust 
plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. 
Specifically, Batt-tek Consulting, Johnson City, TN; GS Yuasa Energy 
Solutions, Roswell, GA; NV Bekaerts, Zwevegem, BELGIUM; Solveteq Ltd, 
Worthing West Sussex, UNITED KINGDOM; and Trafigura Pte Ltd, Geneva, 
SWITZERLAND, have been added as parties to this venture.
    Also, Black Diamond, Austin, TX; and Owens Corning, Apeldoorn, 
NETHERLANDS, have withdrawn as parties to this venture.
    No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned 
activity of the group research project. Membership in this group 
research project remains open, and CBI intends to file additional 
written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.
    On May 24, 2019, CBI filed its original notification pursuant to 
section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice 
in the Federal Register pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on June 21, 
2019 (84 FR 29241).
    The last notification was filed with the Department on February 23, 
2023. A notice was published in the Federal Register pursuant to 
section 6(b) of the Act on March 27, 2023 (88 FR 18184).

Suzanne Morris,
Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.
[FR Doc. 2023-25614 Filed 11-17-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

TROY HOLMES, : CIVIL ACTION

Petitioner :

:

v. :

:

DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, et al., : No. 05-CV-2413

Respondents :

ORDER

MICHAEL M. BAYLSON, J.

AND NOW, this day of , 2005, upon independent

consideration of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus, and after review of the Report and

Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Timothy R. Rice, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED

2. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED with prejudice.

3. There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability.

4. The Clerk of the court shall mark this case closed for statistical purposes. 

BY THE COURT:

___________________________________

MICHAEL M. BAYLSON, J. 

Case 2:05-cv-02413-MMB Document 9 Filed 12/16/05 Page 1 of 1