alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>




                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ENACTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Citizens First Bancorp, Inc., (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Marshall J. Campbell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as enacted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
              or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial condition and results of
              operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the
              Report.


/s/ Marshall J. Campbell
---------------------------------

Marshall J. Campbell
Chief Executive Officer
March 15, 2004
Case 2:05-cv-01257-HB Document 15 Filed 04/20/05 Page 1 of 15
Case 2:05-cv-01257-HB Document 15 Filed 04/20/05 Page 2 of 15
Case 2:05-cv-01257-HB Document 15 Filed 04/20/05 Page 3 of 15
Case 2:05-cv-01257-HB Document 15 Filed 04/20/05 Page 4 of 15
Case 2:05-cv-01257-HB Document 15 Filed 04/20/05 Page 5 of 15
Case 2:05-cv-01257-HB Document 15 Filed 04/20/05 Page 6 of 15
Case 2:05-cv-01257-HB Document 15 Filed 04/20/05 Page 7 of 15
Case 2:05-cv-01257-HB Document 15 Filed 04/20/05 Page 8 of 15
Case 2:05-cv-01257-HB Document 15 Filed 04/20/05 Page 9 of 15
Case 2:05-cv-01257-HB Document 15 Filed 04/20/05 Page 10 of 15
Case 2:05-cv-01257-HB Document 15 Filed 04/20/05 Page 11 of 15
Case 2:05-cv-01257-HB Document 15 Filed 04/20/05 Page 12 of 15
Case 2:05-cv-01257-HB Document 15 Filed 04/20/05 Page 13 of 15
Case 2:05-cv-01257-HB Document 15 Filed 04/20/05 Page 14 of 15
Case 2:05-cv-01257-HB Document 15 Filed 04/20/05 Page 15 of 15
Case 2:02-cv-04403-PBT Document 4-2 Filed 11/07/2002 Page 1 of 7
Case 2:02-cv-04403-PBT Document 4-2 Filed 11/07/2002 Page 2 of 7
Case 2:02-cv-04403-PBT Document 4-2 Filed 11/07/2002 Page 3 of 7
Case 2:02-cv-04403-PBT Document 4-2 Filed 11/07/2002 Page 4 of 7
Case 2:02-cv-04403-PBT Document 4-2 Filed 11/07/2002 Page 5 of 7
Case 2:02-cv-04403-PBT Document 4-2 Filed 11/07/2002 Page 6 of 7
Case 2:02-cv-04403-PBT Document 4-2 Filed 11/07/2002 Page 7 of 7
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

February 25, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00072

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF C.M.O

.,

From the 225th Judicial District Court , Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013

- PA

- 01068 Honorable Dick Alcala, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Appellant attempts to appeal from a final order terminating her parental rights. An appeal

from such an order is accelerated. See T EX

. F AM

. C ODE A NN

. § 263.405( a ). The trial court signed the order of termination on January 20, 2015. Because this is an accelerated appeal, the notice of appeal was due on February 9, 2015. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 26.1(a). A motion for extension of time to file the notice of appeal was due on February 17, 2015

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 26.3. Although appellant filed a notice of ap peal within the fifteen

- day grace period allowed by Rule 26.3, she

did not file a motion for extension of time.

A motion for extension of time is necessarily implied when an appellant, acting in good faith, files a notice of appeal beyond the time allow ed by Rule 26.1 but within the fifteen

- day grace period provided by Rule 26.3 for filing a motion for extension of time. See Verburgt v.

Dorner , 959 S.W.2d 615, 617 (Tex. 1997) (construing the predecessor to Rule 26). However, the appellant must offer a reasonable explanation for failing to file the notice of appeal in a timely manner. See id. ; T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 26.3, 10.5(b)(1)(C).

It is therefore ORDERED that appellant file, within fifteen days from the date of this order, a response presenting a reasonable explanation for failing to file the notice of appeal in a timely manner. If appellant fails to respond within the time provided, the appeal will be

dismissed. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.3(c).

All other appellate deadlines are suspended until fur ther order of this court.

_________________________________ Jason Pulli am, JusticeIN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 25th day of February, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. H ottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Merrill Lynch
Preferred Capital Trust III and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding III, L.P.
(the "Partnership") for the period ended April 1, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Kathleen Skero, Controller of Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., the General
Partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Partnership.




                              MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING III, L.P.

                              By:  MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC., as General Partner


                              By:  /s/ KATHLEEN SKERO
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                              Name:    Kathleen Skero *
                              Title:   Controller, Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.








Dated: May 12, 2005
_____________________

*  Kathleen Skero functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
   and Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership for purposes of Section 906
   of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
No. 56987.

#### Pacific Coast Borax Co. *v.*United States,

protests 185636-K (A) and 185636-K (B) (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

From an examination of the papers in the cases the court was unable to find anything to overcome the presumption of correctness of the collector’s classification. The protests were therefore overruled.
(V. D. 36)

Entry Nos. 874357, etc.

#### Kaufman & Vinson Co. et al. *v.*United States

(Decided September 19, 1956)

*Siegel, Mandell*& *Davidson (Sidney Mandell*of counsel) for the plaintiffs.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

These matters are presently before me on a remand from a classification proceeding decided by the first division of this court in *Kaufman*& *Vinson Co. et al.*v. *United States,*34 Cust. Ct. 293, Abstract 58791. The judgment entered therein stated: “* * * that the matters be remanded to a single judge in reappraisement pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d).”

The matters have been submitted for decision upon an agreed statement of facts entered into by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto.

Upon the agreed facts, I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (d)), to be the proper basis for determining the values of the involved merchandise and that such values are as set forth in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof.

I further find such values to be the dutiable values of said merchandise.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY : CIVIL ACTION

:

 v. :

:

DAVID FORREST, et al. : NO. 02-4435

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 2ND day of March, 2005, it is Ordered

that the STATUS CONFERENCE scheduled for March 4, 2005 at 3:00

p.m. is CANCELED.

ATTEST: or BY THE COURT

S/Marie O’Donnell

BY: 

 Deputy Clerk Anita B. Brody, J.

Civ 12 (9/83)

Copies via ECF on _________ to: Copies MAILED on ____________ to:

Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 145 Filed 03/02/2005 Page 1 of 1
# C_2017357EN.01001201.xml

| 23.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 357/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 357/12

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 September 2017 — Siragusa v Council

(Case T-678/16 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Civil Service - Officials - Leaving the service - Request to retire - Amendment of the Staff Regulations after that request had been made - Withdrawal of an earlier decision - Legal classification of the contested decision))

(2017/C 357/15)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Sergio Siragusa (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by T. Bontinck and A. Guillerme, lawyers)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and M. Veiga, acting as Agents) and European Parliament (represented by: M. Dean and D. Nessaf, acting as Agents)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the order of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 13 July 2016, Siragusa v Council (F-124/15, EU:F:2016:147), seeking to have that order set aside.

Siragusa

Council

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets aside the order of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 13 July 2016, Siragusa v Council (F-124/15); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets aside the order of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 13 July 2016, Siragusa v Council (F-124/15);

| 2. | Refers the case to a chamber of the General Court other than that which has ruled on the present appeal; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Refers the case to a chamber of the General Court other than that which has ruled on the present appeal;

| 3. | Reserves the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Reserves the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 419, 14.11.2016.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Maureen D. Howley, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Managing Owner,
Preferred Investment Solutions Corp. (the Managing Owner), of World Monitor Trust  Series A (Series A), hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



| | (1) | Series As Quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Quarterly
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Series A.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Maureen D. Howley                            
|Maureen D. Howley                                
|Chief Financial Officer and Senior Vice President
|May 15, 2006
(Reap. Dec. 10652)

Entry No. 274, etc.

#### Kurt Orban Company, Inc. *v.*United States

(Decided December 23, 1963)

*Shmretts, Paley £ Carter*for the plaintiff.

*Jolm W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

The proper value for dutiable purposes of certain wire strand forms the subject of the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the schedule attached to and made part of this decision.

The parties hereto have entered into a stipulation of fact wherein it has been agreed—

> That the merchandise covered by the appeals to reappraisement enumerated in Schedule “A,” attached hereto and made part hereof, consist of wire strand exported from Japan during the period beginning January 1, 1959 and ending April 1, 1960; that wire strand is not identified in the Final List published by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54521, effective February 27, 1958; that on or immediately preceding the date of exportation of each shipment of wire strand covered by each of the appeals to reappraisement enumerated on Schedule “A,” the prices at which wire strand, such as or similar to the wire strand described on the invoices covered by the instant appeals to reappraisement were freely sold, or in the absence of sales, offered for sale in the principal market of Japan, in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other expenses incidental to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, was $254. per metric ton for wire strand of % inch diameter and $252. per metric ton for wire strand of %6 inch diameter (United States funds).

*391Upon the record before the court, I find and hold that export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, 91 Treas. Dec. 295, T.D. 54165 (19 U.S.C. § 1401a (b)), is the proper basis of value for the wire strand in issue and that said value is $254 per metric ton for wire strand of %-inch diameter, and $252 per metric ton for wire of %6-inch diameter (United States funds).

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Index page for this item is: http://permanent.access.gpo.gov/lps49822/pubs.usgs.gov/of/1997/ofr-97-0681/index.htm
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                     EXHIBIT 12


                                         MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST III
                                         MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING III, L.P.
                                         COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO
                         COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED SECURITIES DISTRIBUTIONS (UNAUDITED)
                                                 (dollars in thousands)



                              FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED          FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                    March 31, 2009                      March 28, 2008
                           ---------------------------------  ---------------------------------
                              MERRILL LYNCH    MERRILL LYNCH     MERRILL LYNCH    MERRILL LYNCH
                                 PREFERRED       PREFERRED          PREFERRED       PREFERRED
                           CAPITAL TRUST III FUNDING III,L.P. CAPITAL TRUST III FUNDING III,L.P.
                           ----------------- ---------------  ----------------- ---------------

<S>                        <C>                 <C>            <C>               <C>

Earnings                       $ 13,531           $ 15,771        $ 13,531           $ 15,831
                               ========           ========        ========           ========


Fixed charges                  $      -           $      -        $      -           $      -

Preferred securities
 distribution
 requirements                    13,125             13,531          13,125             13,531
                               --------           --------        --------           --------

Total combined fixed
 charges and preferred
 securities distribution
 requirments                   $ 13,125           $ 13,531        $ 13,125           $ 13,531
                               ========           ========        ========           ========

Ratio of earnings to
 combined fixed charges
 and preferred securities
 distribution requirements         1.03               1.17            1.03               1.17




</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Westsphere Asset Corporation, Inc.  (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Douglas MacDonald, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:  April 15, 2005

By:

/s/ Douglas Mac Donald



Name: Douglas MacDonald

Title:   Chief Executive Officer
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6060

KEVIN K. WALLACE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

W. BARR, Sergeant; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER GOLDBERG; CORRECTIONAL OFFICER STELPER; SERGEANT

HICKS,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. M. J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-96-

1945-MJG)

Submitted: May 29, 1997 Decided: June 10, 1997

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kevin K. Wallace, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Glenn William Bell, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
* We also deny appellant's motion for appointment of counsel.

2

PER CURIAM:

Kevin K. Wallace appeals from the district court order granting summary judgment in favor of the Defendants in his action filed

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994). We affirm.

Wallace's complaint alleges two potential violations of his

constitutional rightsCemployment of excessive force, and intolerable conditions of punitive confinement. Addressing Wallace's

excessive force claim, the record discloses no more than de minimis

injury and the use of only a small quantity of mace to aid in the

control of a recalcitrant prisoner. Accordingly, we agree with the

district court's grant of summary judgment as to this claim. See

Norman v. Taylor, 25 F.3d 1259 (4th Cir. 1994) (en banc); Williams

v. Benjamin, 77 F.3d 756, 763 (4th Cir. 1996). Turning to the conditions of confinement claim, we find summary judgment to again be

appropriate given Wallace’s failure to demonstrate serious physical

or emotional injury resulting from the punitive confinement at

issue. See Strickler v. Waters, 989 F.2d 1375, 1380-81 (4th Cir.

1993). We therefore affirm the district court's grant of summary

judgment as to both claims.* We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
No. 61268.

protests 275586-K, etc. (New York).

#### Bruno Scheidt, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of sprats in oil, packed in tins, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Arnold Sorensin Co., Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 199, C. D. 1862), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
# C_2016383EN.01000702.xml

| 17.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 383/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 383/7

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam (Netherlands) lodged on 16 August 2016 — Openbaar Ministerie v Halil Ibrahim Özçelik

(Case C-453/16)

(2016/C 383/10)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Rechtbank Amsterdam

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Openbaar Ministerie

Applicant:

Defendant: Halil Ibrahim Özçelik

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Is the expression ‘judicial decision’, within the meaning of Article 8(1)(c) of Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA, (1) a term of EU law which must be given an autonomous and uniform interpretation? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is the expression ‘judicial decision’, within the meaning of Article 8(1)(c) of Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA, (1) a term of EU law which must be given an autonomous and uniform interpretation?

1

| 2. | If so, what is the meaning of that term? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If so, what is the meaning of that term?

| 3. | Does the confirmation, as in the present case, by a member of the Public Prosecutor’s Office of a national arrest warrant previously issued by the police constitute such a ‘judicial decision’? |
| --- | --- |

3.

Does the confirmation, as in the present case, by a member of the Public Prosecutor’s Office of a national arrest warrant previously issued by the police constitute such a ‘judicial decision’?

---

(1)  Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States (OJ 2002 L 190, p. 1).

1

---
|   | § | This      Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,and |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | § | The      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial position and results of operations of Western      Reserve Bancorp, Inc. as of and for the periods  presented. |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |  /s/ Cynthia A.Mahl                      |
|--------|-----------------------------------------------|
|   | Cynthia      A. Mahl                          |
|   | Executive      Vice President/Chief Financial |
|   | Officer                                       |
|   | May      17, 2010                             |

----
Case 2:02-cv-04332-RK Document 22 Filed 01/13/2004 Page 1 of 7
Case 2:02-cv-04332-RK Document 22 Filed 01/13/2004 Page 2 of 7
Case 2:02-cv-04332-RK Document 22 Filed 01/13/2004 Page 3 of 7
Case 2:02-cv-04332-RK Document 22 Filed 01/13/2004 Page 4 of 7
Case 2:02-cv-04332-RK Document 22 Filed 01/13/2004 Page 5 of 7
Case 2:02-cv-04332-RK Document 22 Filed 01/13/2004 Page 6 of 7
Case 2:02-cv-04332-RK Document 22 Filed 01/13/2004 Page 7 of 7