alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2019093EN.01004301.xml

| 11.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 93/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 93/43

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 December 2018 — GQ and Others v Commission

(Case T-525/16) (1)

((Civil service - Officials - Reform of the Staff Regulations - Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1023/2013 - Types of posts - Transitional rules on grading in the types of posts - Article 31 of Annexe XIII to the Staff Regulations - Assistants in transition - Promotion under Article 45 of the Staff Regulations only allowed within the career streams corresponding to the type of post occupied - Access to the ‘senior assistant’ (AST 10) type of post exclusively in accordance with the procedure under Article 4 and Article 29(1) of the Staff Regulations - Equal treatment - Loss of eligibility for promotion to the next higher grade - Legitimate expectations))

(2019/C 93/53)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: GQ and the 7 other applicants whose names appear in the annex to the judgment (represented by T. Bontinck and A. Guillerme, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by J. Currall and G. Gattinara, subsequently by G. Gattinara and C. Berardis-Kayser and finally by G. Gattinara and G. Berscheid, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: European Parliament (represented initially by M. Dean and N. Chemaï, subsequently by J. Steele, L. Deneys and J. Van Pottelberge, acting as Agents); and the Council of the European Union (represented initially by M. Bauer and E Rebasti and subsequently by M. Bauer and R. Meyer, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 270 TFEU and seeking annulment of the Commission’s decisions by which the appointing authority of that institution classified the applicants in the ‘senior assistant’ type of post, with the consequence that, with effect from 1 January 2014, they were no longer eligible for promotion to the next higher grade, as confirmed by the decisions of that authority of 3 July 2014 rejecting the complaints lodged by the applicants between 11 and 28 March 2014.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders GQ and the other officials of the European Commission whose names are listed in the annex to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders GQ and the other officials of the European Commission whose names are listed in the annex to pay the costs;

| 3. | Orders the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 7, 12.1.2015 (case initially registered before the European Union Civil Service Tribunal under Case No F-111/14 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1.9.2016).

---
# C_2017221EN.01002002.xml

| 10.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 221/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 221/20

---

Judgment of the General Court of 18 May 2017 — Reisswolf v EUIPO (secret.service.)

(Case T-163/16) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Application for EU word mark secret.service. - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Examination of the facts by EUIPO of its own motion - Article 76 of Regulation No 207/2009 - Duty to state reasons - Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009))

(2017/C 221/26)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Reisswolf Akten- und Datenvernichtung GmbH & Co. KG (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: A. Ebert-Weidenfeller, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Hanne, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 February 2016 (Case R 1820/2015-4) concerning an application for registration of the word sign secret.service. as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Reisswolf Akten- und Datenvernichtung GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Reisswolf Akten- und Datenvernichtung GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 200, 6.6.2016.

1

---
### SAT Report PMN Number: P-12-0169 SAT Date: 2/7/2012 Print Date: 4/27/2015

Related cases : Yes Health related cases: Ecotox related cases:

Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 1 1 Health: PMN ; Eco: intact material 2 3 Health: DegPdt ; Eco: high concern for toxicity of incomplete incineratio n p roducts to terrestrial organisms

Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments 3 1 1 PMN 3 2 2 Deg Pdt

Exposure Based Review : Health: N o Ecotox: N o Routes of exposure : Health: Dermal Drinking Water Inhalation Low Concern Ecotox: N o releases to water Fate: ; PMN slow; Deg Pdt rapid

P 2 Rec Comments : Comment: N o Commen t
Keywords : Keywords: N O SIG HLTH CNCRNS

PerFHxA:

LIVER BLOOD MALE REPRO

PFOA/PFOS:IMMUNO ONCO Summary of Assessment :
Fate : Fate Summary: P-12-0169 FATE: MW = 2320 with 2.2% < 500 and 8.7% < 1000 Liquid with MP < 25 C (E) S = N egl. VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E) BP > 400 C (E) H < 1.00E-8 (E) POTW removal (%) = 90 via sorption Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg > mo Sorption to soils/sediments = PMN strong; Deg Pdt low PBT Potential: PMN P3B1; Deg Pdt P3B2 *CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = PMN slow; Deg Pdt rapid

Health : Health Summary: Absorption of the low molecular weight fraction (8.7% < 1000, 2.2% < 500) is poor all routes, based on physical/chemical properties. N o significant health concerns. For the potential incomplete incineration product, based on test data for the analogue p erfluorohexanoic acid, concerns are liver toxicity, blood toxicity, and male reproductive toxicity [rat 28-day oral NOAEL = 50 mg/kg, LOAEL = 150 mg/kg with liver toxicity; rat 90-day oral LOAEL = 10 mg/kg based on decreased body weight in males at all doses and liver toxicity and anemia at 200 mg/kg; there were toxic effects on the testes in 2 males in the 90-day oral study that were judged by the reviewer to be indicative of the potential for male reproductive toxicity. There is also concern for immunosuppression and oncogenicity based on data for PFOA and PFOS.

Ecotox : Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 * daphnid 48-h LC50 * green algal 96-h EC50 * fish

_ chronic value * daphnid

_ chronic value *
algal

_ chronic value *Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge

_ Chronic Value _

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for anionic polymers; SAR chemical class = p olyme r -anionic-(meth)acrylate- p erFC6; MW 5470 with 8.7% < 1000 and 2.2% < 500; liquid with mp unknown (P); S < 0.001 mg/L at 20 C(P); p H7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness <150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments Assessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern ( p pb) *

SARs p olyanionic polymers SAR Class p olyme r -anionic-COO- p erfluoro C6 Ecotox Category Polyanionic Polymers (& Monomers)

Ecotox Factors Comments:
SAT Chair:
Exhibit 10.24

DUSKA THERAPEUTICS, INC.

AMENDMENT TO NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT



THIS AMENDMENT (the Amendment") TO THE NON-QUALIFIED STOCK OPTION AGREEMENT (the "Original Agreement") dated as of the 26th day ofSeptember, 2007 by and between Duska Therapeutics, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), andJames S. Kuo ("Optionee") is effective as of the 10th day of November, 2008.



RECITAL



1. Pursuant to the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan (the "Plan") of the Company, the Optionee was issued a non-qualified stock option (the "Option") to purchase 1,124,150 shares of Common Stock of the Company at a price of $1 per share upon the terms and conditions set forth in the Agreement.



2. In order to reduce the number of the Company's issued and outstanding options, the Optionee has agreed to terminate the Agreement and have the Company cancel the Option.



AGREEMENT



NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and of the undertakings of the parties hereto contained herein, it is hereby agreed:



1. The Agreement and the Option granted pursuant to the Agreement are hereby terminated.





IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the date and year first above written.





| |                          |                          
| | ------------------------ | -------------------------
| | DUSKA THERAPEUTICS, INC.
| |                          |                          
| | By:                      | /s/ Amir Pelleg, Ph.D.   
| |                          | Name: Amir Pelleg, Ph. D.
| |                          | Title: President         
| |                          |                          
| | OPTIONEE                
| |                          |                          
| | By:                      | /s/ James Kuo            
| |                          | Dr. James Kuo            
| |                          | 1050 Scorlati Place      
| |                          | La Jolla, CA 92037
# C_2016371EN.01003301.xml

| 10.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 371/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 371/33

---

Action brought on 26 August 2016 — ZZ v Commission

(Case F-47/16)

(2016/C 371/38)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

The application to annul the decision not to include the applicant on the list of officials promoted in the context of the 2015 annul promotion exercise.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | annul AIPN’s decision not to promote the applicant in the 2015 promotion exercise; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul AIPN’s decision not to promote the applicant in the 2015 promotion exercise;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

---
Case: 11-2909 Document: 00311 0865140 Page: 1 Date Filed: 04/11/2012 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT t'. • 

11-2909 

State Farm Mutual Auto Ins Co, et a1 v. Philly Family Practice Inc, et al FILED 

2-05-cv-02081 APR 11 2012 

ORJ)ER B

MICHAEl E. KUNZ, Clerk 

Y Dep.Cierk 

In accordance with the agreement of the parties in the above-captioned case, the matter is hereby 

dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), without cost to either party. A certified copy ofthis 

order is issued in lieu of~ formal mandate. 

For the Court, 

Pc~'Pf./V~ 

Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk 

Dated: April 11, 2012 

cc: 

Richard M. Castagna Esq. 

Cy Goldberg Esq. 

Matthew Moroney Esq. 

A. Charles Peruto Jr. Esq. 

' 

Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk 

Certified order issued in lieu of mandate. 

Case 2:05-cv-02081-JS Document 334 Filed 04/11/12 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**          I, James L. Box, certify that:          1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of ebank Financial Services, Inc.;          2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;          3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;          4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:          a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;          b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and          c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter(the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting;          5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):          a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small businessissuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and          b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.Date:November 10, 2005         By:       /s/ James L. Box    James L. Box, President and Chief Executive Officer
No. 56356.

protests 171650-K, etc. (New York).

#### Acme Litho Plate Graining, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
- Bureau of the Fiscal Service
- Reports, Statements & Publications
- Combined Statement
- Previous Reports

# Previous Reports

- Combined Statement of Receipts, Outlays, and Balances for Fiscal Year 2022
- Combined Statement of Receipts, Outlays, and Balances for Fiscal Year 2021
- Combined Statement of Receipts, Outlays, and Balances for Fiscal Year 2020
- Combined Statement of Receipts, Outlays, and Balances for Fiscal Year 2019
- Combined Statement of Receipts, Outlays, and Balances for Fiscal Year 2018
- Combined Statement of Receipts, Outlays, and Balances for Fiscal Year 2017
- Combined Statement of Receipts, Outlays, and Balances for Fiscal Year 2016
- Combined Statement of Receipts, Outlays, and Balances for Fiscal Year 2015
- Combined Statement of Receipts, Outlays, and Balances for Fiscal Year 2014
- Combined Statement of Receipts, Outlays, and Balances for Fiscal Year 2013
- Combined Statement of Receipts, Outlays, and Balances for Fiscal Year 2012
- Combined Statement of Receipts, Outlays, and Balances for Fiscal Year 2011
- Combined Statement of Receipts, Outlays, and Balances for Fiscal Year 2010
- Combined Statement of Receipts, Outlays, and Balances for Fiscal Year 2009
- Combined Statement of Receipts, Outlays, and Balances for Fiscal Year 2008
- Combined Statement of Receipts, Outlays, and Balances for Fiscal Year 2007
- Combined Statement of Receipts, Outlays, and Balances for Fiscal Year 2006
- Combined Statement of Receipts, Outlays, and Balances for Fiscal Year 2005
- Combined Statement of Receipts, Outlays, and Balances for Fiscal Year 2004
- Combined Statement of Receipts, Outlays, and Balances for Fiscal Year 2003
- Combined Statement of Receipts, Outlays, and Balances for Fiscal Year 2002
- Combined Statement of Receipts, Outlays, and Balances for Fiscal Year 2001

- Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2000    - Appendix for Fiscal Year 2000 

- Annual Report for Fiscal Year 1999    - Appendix for Fiscal Year 1999 

- Annual Report for Fiscal Year 1998    - Appendix for Fiscal Year 1998 

- Annual Report for Fiscal Year 1997    - Appendix for Fiscal Year 1997 

- Annual Report for Fiscal Year 1996    - Appendix for Fiscal Year 1996 

- Annual Report for Fiscal Year 1995    - Appendix for Fiscal Year 1995 

## Historical Information (1872 – 1994)

View data for 1872-1994. Copies of the Combined Statement are from the Treasury Library collection.

Last modified 11/09/23
Before the Third Division,

March 25, 1954

No. 57946.

protests 169804-K and 169805-K (New York).

#### Thomas Pipitone *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of artichokes in olive oil and peppers in vinegar, similar in all material respects to the merchandise the subject of *E. J. Petrosemolo Co., Inc.*and *Barian Shipping Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 159, C. D. 1461), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 56970.

#### North Atlantic Seed Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 164366-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of bird’s-foot trefoil seed *(Lotus*corniculatus) similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Transcontinental Seed, Inc. (Alltransport, Incorporated)*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 163, C. D. 1462), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Before the Third Division,

December 31, 1943

No. 49096.

#### Protest 63831-K of V. W. Davis (Duluth).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is wild rice similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Davis*v. *United States*(10 Cust. Ct. 189, C. D. 751), which record was incorporated herein. In accordance therewith the protest was sustained.
Before the First Division,

February 16, 1949

No. 52879.

#### Barth-Feinberg, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 143841-K (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of music boxes similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Thorens Co.*v. *United States*(15 Cust. Ct. 165, C. D. 965). In accordance therewith the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
----

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF        2002**

|   | 1. | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended                  and |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Registrant as of and for the periods presented in the                  Report. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/                                  | Lynda                    J. Nahra                        |
|--------|--------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                 | Lynda                    J. Nahra                        |
|   |                                 | President                    and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |                                 |                                                     |
|   | /s/                                  | Charles                    G. Baltuskonis                |
|   |                                 | Charles                    G. Baltuskonis                |
|   |                                 | Executive                    Vice President and          |
|   |                                 | Chief                    Financial Officer               |
|   | November                    13, 2007 |

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                        9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998                  JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998                  JUL-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998                  MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          16,218                       16,218
<SECURITIES>                                         0                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,964                        7,964
<ALLOWANCES>                                       350                          350
<INVENTORY>                                      5,152                        5,152
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                29,703                       29,703
<PP&E>                                          13,004                       13,004
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,410                        4,410
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  38,502                       38,502
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,351                        5,351
<BONDS>                                          7,641                        7,641
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                            0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                            0
<COMMON>                                             8                            8
<OTHER-SE>                                      25,085                       25,085
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    38,502                       38,502
<SALES>                                         13,061                       36,344
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,061                       36,344
<CGS>                                            5,541                            0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,541                       14,933
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,048                       17,432
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 151                          497
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,321                        3,482
<INCOME-TAX>                                       469                        1,236
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                852                        2,246
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                            0
<CHANGES>                                            0                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       852                        2,246
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.12                         0.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.11                         0.31
        

</TABLE>