alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
WHAT IS EFTPS?

HOW DO I ENROLL?

The Electronic Federal Tax Payment System (EFTPS) is a free service from the U.S. Department of the Treasury. EFTPS 

is a convenient way to make federal tax payments online or by phone, 24/7. 

EFTPS is secure and easy to use—enabling you to schedule your payments in minutes.

Businesses can schedule payments once the liability is determined up to 365 days in advance.

Individuals can schedule estimated payments up to 365 days in advance.

1 Gather the following information:

 • Taxpayer Identification Number (Employer Identification Number or Social Security Number)

 • Bank account number and routing number

 • Address and name as they appear on your IRS tax documents

2 Visit www.eftps.gov

 • Select the Enrollment tab • Enter the requested information

 • Select Business or Individual • Submit

3 Get your temporary Internet password.

 After you receive your PIN, call 1.800.982.3526 to get a temporary Internet password.

YOUR GUIDE FOR PAYING TAXES 

THE EASY WAY—ELECTRONICALLY.

HOW DO I MAKE A TAX PAYMENT USING EFTPS?

USING A TAX PROFESSIONAL?

ONLINE:

PHONE:

QUESTIONS? 

EFTPS Customer Service for Businesses at 1.800.555.4477 | EFTPS Customer Service for Individuals 1.800.316.6541 

1 Visit www.eftps.gov and select “Make a Payment.”

2 Log in with your EIN/SSN, PIN, and Internet password.

 Note: For your added security, the first time you visit www.eftps.gov, you will be prompted to change this password.

3 Enter the payment information in the step-by-step screens.

4 When you’re finished, save a copy of the Payment Confirmation page. This contains your EFT Acknowledgment 

 Number that acts as a receipt for your payment instruction.

1 Call 1.800.555.3453.

2 Enter your EIN/SSN and PIN.

3 Press 1 to make a payment.

4 Follow the prompts to complete your payment.

5 Record your EFT Acknowledgment Number.

If a payroll company, accountant, or other third party makes any federal tax payments for you, be sure to review this 

information with that entity.

Payments must be scheduled at least one calendar day prior to the tax due date (before 8:00 p.m. ET). 

Remember, you can use EFTPS to make all federal tax payments and to review up to sixteen months of your tax payment history.
No. 58472.

petition 6955-R (San Francisco).

#### Hulse Import Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

From the testimony, it appeared that at the time of the entry of the merchandise the matter of the correct basis of value was under discussion between the customhouse broker and the appraiser. Entry was made at the higher value, which the appraiser indicated he was prepared to adopt. Subsequently, upon consultation between the head of the petitioning company, the customhouse broker, and the attorneys, it was decided to litigate the issue, and a timely amendment of the entry was filed, reducing the entered values. The matter proceeded to trial, and the ultimate decision was against the importer’s contention. On the record presented, it was held that there was no intention to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the case or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore granted.
Exhibit 13.1

Officer Certifications

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of América Móvil, S.A.B. de C.V., a sociedad anónima bursátil de capital variable organized under the laws of Mexico (the Company), does hereby certify to such officers
knowledge that:

The annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 (the Form 20-F) of the Company fully complies
with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: July 2, 2007

/s/ Daniel Hajj AboumradName: Daniel Hajj AboumradTitle: Chief Executive Officer


Dated: July 2, 2007

/s/ Carlos José García Moreno ElizondoName: Carlos José García Moreno ElizondoTitle: Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.1

                Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                       As Adopted Pursuant To Section 906
                        Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002

In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of GSV, Inc. (the  "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2007 (the "Report"),  I, Gilad Gat, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant
to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the  requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.




                                                    By: /s/ Gilad Gat
                                                        -------------
                                                        Gilad Gat
                                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                                        May 15, 2007
-                          Home                     
-                          Data Products                     
-                     International Baseline Data                

# International Baseline Data

The USDA, Economic Research Service's International Baseline Data webpages provide multiple resources enabling users to navigate the 10-year international agricultural projections, which are developed by the USDA, Interagency Agricultural Projections Committee. International baseline projections indicate long-run supply, demand, and trade for major agricultural commodities and major exporting and importing countries and regions. The projections provide foreign country detail supporting the annual ***USDA Agricultural Projections****report***, published in February.

**Visualization: International Baseline Projections** provides information on the supply, demand, and trade projections for major agricultural commodities for select countries/regions. The information is presented through line graphs, using the most recently available international baseline projection data. Limited macroeconomic data for the selected country/region is also made available.  

The **Agricultural Baseline Topics page** provides information regarding the baseline and a listing of baseline-related products:
          - ***USDA Agricultural Projections report***
          - **USDA Agricultural Projections**
          - **Agricultural Baseline Database**
          - **Baseline Questions & Answers page**

The international baseline also maintains a **Documentation page**. The documentation page is intended to clarify the scope and coverage of the data, methods used to develop projections, strengths and limitations of the projections, related resources, and the recommended citation for the USDA International Baseline Projections.

The most recent and historic international projection data, going back as far as 2002, can be downloaded via a Zip file.

**Note**: Projections are based on conditions as they existed upon the release of the October 2023 *World Agricultural Supply and Demand Estimates*(**WASDE**). For timely reports on foreign markets please see the USDA’s, Foreign Agricultural Service’s Global Agricultural Information Network (**GAIN**) webpage.

-  International Baseline Data Sets 

- Overview
- Visualization: International Baseline Projections
- Documentation

-  U.S. Agricultural Trade 
-  Wheat 
-  Macroeconomics & Agriculture 
-  Animal Products 
-  Cattle & Beef 
-  Hogs & Pork 
-  Poultry & Eggs 
-  Cotton and Wool 
-  Countries & Regions 
-  International Consumer and Food Industry Trends 
-  Trade Policy & World Trade Organization (WTO) 
-  Farm Economy 
-  International Markets & U.S. Trade 
-  Animal Policy & Regulatory Issues 

**Last updated:** Thursday, February 22, 2024

**For more information, contact:**Baseline  Team
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 2SUPPLEMENT	&"Arial,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2024 ReportingSection VII

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2023-08	&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000DRAFT&K000000 VII ESR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout 4/20/23
EX-10.12





 Exhibit 10.12 

Apache Corporation Non-Qualified Restorative Retirement Savings Plan 

Amendment to Definition of Change of Control 

Apache Corporation (“Apache”) sponsors the Apache Corporation Non-Qualified Restorative Retirement Savings
Plan (the “Plan”). In section 8.02 of the Plan, Apache reserved the right to amend the Plan from time to time. Apache hereby exercises that right as follows, effective March 1, 2021: 

 

	1.	 Section 1.06 (Change of Control) is hereby amended by replacing the word “Apache” with the
phrase “APA Corporation, a Delaware corporation, or its successor”. 


 [Signature Page Follows] 

  
 Page 1 of 1 













 EXECUTED this 1st day of March, 2021. 

 

			
	 APACHE CORPORATION

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/ Brandy Jones

		 	Brandy Jones
		 	Vice President, Human Resources



  
 Signature Page to Apache
Corporation Non-Qualified Restorative Retirement Savings Plan 
 Amendment to Definition of Change of Control
Honorable W. Lee O'Danlel

Governor of Texas Austin, Texas

Dear Sir: Opinion No. o-2662-~ Re: Authority of Governor to "cause the laws to be faithfully executed"

With further reference to our opinionNo. o-2662, recently addressed to you, it has come to our attention that inaLacussing the questions therein submittedby you we,overlooked Section 24, Acts 1935, 44th Legislature,p. 444, ch. 181. As a result of thla omlaaion, that opinion Is Incorrect, in that it falls to call to your attention the powers vests&In you by Section 24 of the Act referred to, whereby you may cuted." "'cause the laws to be faithfully exeWe sincerelyregret that this error occurred, and hasten to modify o-2662 to the end that itmay be corrected.

Section 24 of Acts 1935, 44thLegislature, ch. 181, reada as follows: p. 444,

"Uponthe occurrence of a public disaster, riot, or insurrection,or the formation of a dangerous resistance to the enforcementof the law, or for the purpose of performinghi.3constitutionalduty to cause the laws to be enforced, the Governor of this State shall have the authority to assume the command of and BLrect the actlvitlea and functions of the commissionand of the department during the existenceof such an emergency or necessity. In the event that the Governor of this State shall take such action, he shall' flratuse the officers and. personnel of the department other than the TexasHighway Patrol and the said Patrol shallbe so calledupon or diverted from its regular duties only in the,event that the department 13 otherwiseunable to copewith the emergency."

In the original opinion, itwas pointed out that until the legislativebranch of the State government should provllde

means by which the Governormight effectively "causeHonorable W. Lee O'Daniel,page 2 O-2662-A

the laws to be faithfully executed", therewas little that the executive is able to do In order effectivelyto compel the faithful executionof the laws of the State of Texas. Section 24 of the act above referred to expresslyauthorizes the Governor to assume the command of and direct the actlvitiea and functions of the Public Safety Commissionand of theDepartment of Public Safetywhen necessary for the purpose of performing his constitutionalduty to cause the laws of the State to be enforced,during the exlatence of suchnecessity.

Yours very truly

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS

By aLR. W. Fairchild R. W. Fairchild Assistant

RWF:GO:wc

APPROVED SEP 16, 1940 s/Gerald C. Mann ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
Approved Opinlon CommitteeBy s/BWB Chalrman
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

BISHNU C. BORAH, M.D., P.C. and 

BISHNU BORAH, M.D., 

Plaintiffs,

v.

MONUMENTAL LIFE INSURANCE 

COMPANY, et. al. 

Defendants.

Civil Action

Case No. 04-3617

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS OF

MONUMENTAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

AND NOW, this __ day of _________, 2005, upon consideration 

of the motion dismiss of Monumental Life Insurance Company and 

related entities, it is hereby ORDERED that said motion is 

DENIED in its entirety.

________________________________

J.

 1422805v1
# attribtable--OUTPUT

&"Arial,Bold"&10Part 2SUPPLEMENT		&"Arial,Bold"&10Fiscal Year 2017 ReportingSection IV  &"Calibri,Regular"&8   

&"Arial,Bold"&9  Bulletin No. 2017-04	&"Arial,Bold"&9IV  AT - &P	&"Arial,Bold"&9March 2017
2021_Shelby_HPMSVehTypeVMT

HPMSVTypeID

yearID HPMSBaseYearVMT bseYearOffNetVMT 10 2021 30597047 0 20 2021 7.31E+ 09 0 30 20212.22E+ 09 0 40 2021 39679667 0 50 2021 3.5E+ 08 0 60 20215.39E+ 08 0

Page 1
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2004



The undersigned executive officers of the Registrant hereby certify that this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.



By:

/s/ Gary C. LoraditchName:

Gary C. LoraditchTitle:

PresidentBy:

/s/ Bonnie M. KleinName:

Bonnie M. KleinTitle:

Vice President and Treasurer




Date: May 16, 2005
Exhibit 32


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Merrill Lynch Preferred
Capital Trust III (the "Trust") and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding III, L.P.
(the "Partnership") for the period ended June 27, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Ahmass
L. Fakahany, Regular Trustee of the Trust and Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., the General Partner of the
Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust
    and the Partnership.




                              MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST III


                              By:  /s/ AHMASS L. FAKAHANY
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                              Name:   Ahmass L. Fakahany *
                              Title:  Regular Trustee




                               MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING III, L.P.


                               By: MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC., as General Partner



                               By:  /s/ AHMASS L. FAKAHANY
                                    --------------------------------------------
                               Name:   Ahmass L. Fakahany *
                               Title:  Executive Vice President and
                                       Chief Financial Officer



Dated: August 7, 2003
_____________________

*  Ahmass L. Fakahany functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
   and Chief Financial Officer of each of the Trust and the Partnership for
   purposes of Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 6D23-2006

Lower Tribunal No. CF21-008422-XX

_____________________________

MIGUEL ANGEL RODRIGUEZ,

Appellant, 

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

_____________________________

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County.

Lori A. Winstead, Judge.

April 2, 2024

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

MIZE, BROWNLEE and GANNAM, JJ., concur.

Howard L. “Rex” Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Andrea M. Norgard, Assistant 

Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Katherine Coombs Cline, Senior 

Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING 

AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
# C_2021252EN.01003604.xml

| 28.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/36

---

Order of the General Court of 6 May 2021 — Miranda Garcia v European Court of Justice

(Case T-547/16) (1)

(2021/C 252/54)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 190, 8.6.2015 (case originally registered before the European Union Civil Service Tribunal under number F-53/15 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1.9.2016).

---
# C_2016305EN.01001301.xml

| 22.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 305/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 305/13

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione (Italy) lodged on 17 May 2016 — Preqù Italia s.r.l. v Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli

(Case C-276/16)

(2016/C 305/18)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Corte suprema di cassazione

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Preqù Italia s.r.l.

Appellant:

Respondent: Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli

Respondent:

Question referred

Question referred

Is the Italian [tax] legislation [in question] contrary to the general principle of EU law that parties have a right to be heard in administrative procedures in that it does not provide, in favour of a taxpayer who has not been heard prior to the adoption of a tax measure by the customs authorities, for the suspension of that measure as the normal consequence of the lodging of an appeal?

---
Skip to main content    

*An official website of the United States Government*

## 508

## Pagination

-  Home 
-  About     -  Mission 
  -  Insignia 
  -  Strategic Plan 
  -  EEO & Diversity 
  -  Contract Opportunities 
-  Resources     -  Alerts/Advisories/Notices/Bulletins/Fact Sheets 
  -  Bank Secrecy Act Filing Information 
  -  Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting 
  -  Financial Trend Analyses 
  -  COVID-19 Information 
  -  Financial Institutions 
  -  FinCEN Exchange 
  -  Innovation 
  -  International 
  -  Law Enforcement 
  -  SAR Stats 
  -  Statutes and Regulations 
  -  Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) Advisory Key Terms 
-  Newsroom     -  News 
  -  Readouts 
  -  Speeches 
  -  Testimony 
  -  Enforcement Actions 
  -  SAR Technical Bulletins 
-  Careers     -  Core Career Descriptions 
  -  Quality of Work Life 
  -  Current Openings 
-  Advisories 
-  Glossary 

## Sidebar Menu

-  Resources    -  Alerts/Advisories/Notices/Bulletins/Fact Sheets 
  -  Bank Secrecy Act Filing Information 
  -  Beneficial Ownership Information Reporting 
  -  Financial Trend Analyses 
  -  COVID-19 Information 
  -  Financial Institutions 
  -  FinCEN Exchange 
  -  Innovation 
  -  International 
  -  Law Enforcement 
  -  SAR Stats 
  -  Statutes and Regulations 
  -  Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) Advisory Key Terms 

                            - Chapter X Main Page
                            - SAR Key Terms

                            - Mandatory E-Filing FAQs
                            - FinCEN CTR FAQs
                            - FinCEN SAR FAQs
                            - BSA FAQs
                            - FinCEN FAQs on Cyber-Events

# Alerts/Advisories/Notices/Bulletins/Fact Sheets

As part of fulfilling its mission to safeguard the financial system and promote national security, FinCEN, through its Financial Institution Advisory Program, issues public and non-public advisories to financial institutions concerning money laundering or terrorist financing threats and vulnerabilities for the purpose of enabling financial institutions to guard against such threats.  Advisories often contain illicit activity typologies, red flags that facilitate monitoring, and guidance on complying with FinCEN regulations to address those threats and vulnerabilities.  Financial institutions may use this information to enhance their Anti-Money Laundering (AML) monitoring systems for more valuable suspicious activity reporting.

 

 

## Alerts

## Recent Advisories

Read More Advisories

 

 

## Footer menu

-  Home 

-  Resources 

-  Contact 

-  About 

-  Careers 

-  Newsroom 

-  Contract Opportunities 

-  Get News Updates 

Languages

USA.govRegulations.govTreasury.govIRS.govFreedom of Information Act (FOIA)NO FEAR ActVote.govAccessibilityEEO & Diversity PolicyPrivacy PolicyPublic Posting Notice of Finding of DiscriminationSecurity and Vulnerability Disclosure Policies (VDP)Office of Inspector General
Case No. 14,987.

#### UNITED STATES v. DOUGHTY et al.

[1 Quart. Law J. 69.]

Circuit Court, E. D. Virginia.

Nov. 30, 1855.

Evidence — Seamen—Indictment fob Revolt— Shipping Akticles—Copy—Handwriting.

1. On a charge of revolt against seamen, a copy of the shipping articles purporting to be signed by the prisoners cannot be given in evidence to show that the prisoners were part of the crew, without proof of loss or destruction of the original articles.

2. The original articles cannot be given in evidence unless the handwriting of the prisoner is proved.

This was an indictment under the act of congress, March, 1835, § 2 [4 Stat. 776], for. an endeavor to commit a revolt on board of the American ship Arcóle (E. A. Pitman,. master), while lying in Hampton Roads. Plea not guilty.

John M. Gregory, for the United States.

Henry G. Cannon and James R. Crenshaw, for prisoners.

On the trial, the attorney for the United States offered in evidence a certified copy of the shipping articles, for the purpose of proving that the prisoners were the crew or part of the crew of the said ship.

But, on motion of the defendants, THE COURT held that a copy could not be read in evidence without first proving that the original was lost or destroyed.

The attorney then obtained from the custom house the original articles purporting to be signed by the prisoners. But the defendants moved the court to exclude the original articles unless the attorney for the United States could prove the signatures of the prisoners to have been made by themselves or by some persons authorized to sign for them, which motion THE COURT sustained.

The attorney then offered to prove that the prisoners were on board of the Arcóle as her crew; but THE COURT held after argument that any contract different from that provided for and rendered necessary by the act of congress of July 20, 1840, c. 48, § 10 [5 Stat. 395], was void; and that act requiring a written or printed contract, and declaring any contract of a different character to be void, no parol contract or verbal agreement could be proven; and that unless the prisoners were part of the crew of the vessel, they could not be prosecuted for an endeavor to commit a revolt, and therefore the jury must find the prisoners not guilty.