alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 06672

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2File Name3

Description

x 06672\06672_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

06672\06672_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

x 06672\06672_Part A.xls EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 06672\06672_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06672\06672_Part C.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06672\06672_Part D.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 06672\06672_Part H.xls Plant submitted survey file

06672\Certification Statement Plant ID_06672.pdf Plant certification statement

x 06672\Supporting Documents\06672_ Attachment A5-2 Map 3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 06672\Supporting Documents\06672_ Attachment A5-2 Map1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 06672\Supporting Documents\06672_ Attachment A5-2 Map4.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 06672\Supporting Documents\06672_ Part A5-3 WB-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

06672\Supporting Documents\06672_ Part C2-31 Block Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

06672\Supporting Documents\06672_ Part C3-36 Block Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 06672\Supporting Documents\06672_ Part D3-1Block Diagram1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 06672\Supporting Documents\06672_ Part D3-1Block Diagram2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 06672\Supporting Documents\06672_ Part D3-1Block Diagram3.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 06672\Supporting Documents\06672_Attachment A5-2 Map 2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 06672\Supporting Documents\06672_Attachment A5-2 Map 5.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket. 

3

 No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.
# Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to Iran

                        On November 14, 1979, by Executive Order 12170, the President declared a national emergency with respect to Iran pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701*et seq.*) and took related steps to deal with the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States constituted by the situation in Iran.                    

Our relations with Iran have not yet normalized, and the process of implementing the agreements with Iran, dated January 19, 1981, is ongoing. For this reason, the national emergency declared on November 14, 1979, and the measures adopted on that date to deal with that emergency, must continue in effect beyond November 14, 2023. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency with respect to Iran declared in Executive Order 12170.

The emergency declared by Executive Order 12170 is distinct from the emergency declared in Executive Order 12957 on March 15, 1995. This renewal, therefore, is distinct from the emergency renewal of March 10, 2023.

                        This notice shall be published in the                         *Federal Register*                         and transmitted to the Congress.                    

[FR Doc. 2023-25006

Billing code 3395-F4-P
No. 60386.

protests 300459-K, *300464-K,*and 300465-K (New York).

#### Olivier Straw Goods Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of fur hoods the same in all material respects as those passed upon in *United States*v. *Accurate Millinery Co., Roberts, Reilly & Sons, et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 229, C. A. D. 599), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# C_2018190EN.01002401.xml

| 4.6.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 190/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.6.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 190/24

---

Judgment of the General Court of 20 April 2018 — holyGhost v EUIPO — CBM (holyGhost)

(Case T-439/16) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark holyGhost - Earlier EU word mark HOLY - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)))

(2018/C 190/43)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: holyGhost GmbH (Munich, Germany) (represented by: M. Wiedemann and D. Engbrink, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented initially by A. Schifko and subsequently by D. Walicka, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: CBM Creative Brands Marken GmbH (Zurich, Switzerland)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 30 May 2016 (Case R 2867/2014-5), concerning opposition proceedings between CBM and holyGhost.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | The action is dismissed; |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed;

| 2. | HolyGhost GmbH is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

HolyGhost GmbH is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 350, 26.9.2016.

1

---
Case No. 15,000.

#### UNITED STATES v. DULANY.

[1 Cranch, C. C. 571.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

Nov. Term, 1809.

Criminal Law—Securitv fob Costs.

The prosecutor must give security for costs.

1

 [Reported by Hon. William Cranch, Chief Judge.]

Mr. Youngs, for defendant [John Peyton Dulany], moved to stay the trial until the prosecutor give security for costs according to rule No. 29, in the rule-book: the prosecutor (Dr. Spohn) having removed from the District and having no property. Granted.
p.1 

OAR Box 1384 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

Document Number: 

55) ll-E-15 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:04 AM Sheet 55 of 264 
P.2 

CONTACT REPORT FORM 

PES PROJECT NO. N204 

;rj'/-/S 

Date Company Contact 

10-21-93 GIas/Steel Ind. Laminates Don Roilen 

Description: 

Phone 

901-853-5070 

I contacted Mr. Rollen to check on a possible proprietary control technique 

at Glas/Steel listed on their survey response (161). They produce copper clad 

continuous laminates from polyester, vinyl ester, and epoxy resins. The process 

for the survey is continuous lamination (06), and is a flat sheet for printed 

circuit boards. For Table 2, "Emission Reduction Techniques", no proprietary 

control techniques are in operation. The process is covered, hooded, and routed 

out of the building. 

dc
SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A
473R - 742.11EMEIFERNa 2

*.1 7 :-''.74;."4T1';051(EPANINZWAKe'75'11 , 1-;f7,`_:. .• Having reviewed the briefs and the record, we approve the panel's recommendation that Kossack be suspended subject to conditions. However, in weighing Kossack's disregard of the responsibilities of running a legal practice and supervising his staff against the fraudulent and well-concealed conduct of his staff, we determine that a shorter period of suspension is appropriate. Further, while conditions are appropriate, we determine that the panel's recommended conditions require modification to better protect the public. We therefore reject the recommended suspension term of three years and instead direct that Kossack be suspended for 18 months, with the conditions that (1) Kossack be required to take and pass the MPRE prior to applying for reinstatement; (2) if reinstated, Kossack shall enter into a two-year mentoring agreement with a mentor approved by the state bar; the mentor shall have access to and control over Kossack's trust account, and the mentor shall make quarterly written reports to bar counsel regarding Kossack's law practice and trust account; (3) if reinstated, Kossack's mentor shall determine whether Kossack shall (a) complete a substance abuse evaluation and comply with any recommendations or (b) participate in the Lawyers Concerned for Lawyers program"; (4) if reinstated, in addition to the customary required annual CLE, in his first year of reinstatement, Kossack shall complete four CLE credits in ethics and six CLE credits in accounting, trust account management, and/or law practice management; and (5) Kossack shall pay the costs of the disciplinary proceedings before applying for reinstatement.
'Alternatively, if, along with any petition for reinstatement, Kossack provides evidence that he has passed a drug test within the 30 days prior to the petition being filed, this requirement may be waived.C.J. Pickering 

# op , • -

, J

3

130; '51•1" 41 M1q1P- 1";:. ■ 7';:ff ra fffirhila Accordingly, we hereby suspend Robert K. Kossack from the practice of law for 18 months from the date of this order. In addition, Kossack must comply with the conditions set forth above.

It is so ORDERED.

Gibbons



### Le-e-c-a- 1 Hardesty

Parraguirre

( 

### 1

. E) Douglas , J.

Saitta
cc: Jeffrey R. Albregts, Chair, Southern Nevada Disciplinary Board David Clark, Bar Counsel Kimberly K. Farmer, Executive Director, State Bar of Nevada Robert J. Kossack Perry Thompson, Admissions Office, United States Supreme Court

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A klikZEWIZEINEENEEZE
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
BUREAU OF THE FISCAL SERVICE
WASHINGTON, DC 20227

JUN 2 4 2015

Dear OTCnet Point of Contact,

This letter is to officially inform you about the change of address for foreign currency cash
deposits only to Bank of America. Currently, Federal agency depositors send their listed and
non-listed foreign currencies under $5,000.00 USD value, along with an OTCnet deposit ticket
to:

Bank of America GBN-LA
CA 9-708-L3-13

P.O. Box 54529

Los Angeles, CA 90054-0529

If the foreign currency is over $5,000.00 USD value, Federal agency depositors will call Bank of
America’s banknote trading desk number (800-387-1012) for an armored courier pick up.

Effective July 6, 2015, Federal agency depositors for listed and non-listed foreign currencies
under $5,000.00 USD value, along with an OTCnet deposit ticket, will be sent to the following
new address:

Bank of America GBN-LA
Mail Code: CA9-924-01-11
2706 Media Center Drive
Los Angeles, CA 90065-1733

Federal agency depositors for foreign currency deposits over $5,000.00 USD value will still call
Bank of America’s banknote trading desk number (800-387-1012) for an armored courier pick

up.

Should you have any questions, please contact Mike Zeigler on (202) 874-8906 or Ava Singleton
at (202) 874-9986.

Sincerely, |
Vr bint

David M. Metler, Director
Over-the-Counter Division (OTC)
A/C Revenue Collections Management
No. 61766.

#### Border Brokerage Company *v.*United States,

protests 305887-K, etc. (Seattle).

*506Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of yellow cedar the same in all material respects as that the subject of *Border Brokerage Co. et al.*v. *United States*(39 Cust. Ct. 179, C. D. 1923), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Of the District of Puerto Rico, sitting by designation. *

Not for Publication in West's Federal Reporter

United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit

No. 06-2363

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Appellant,

v.

HARRY GUZMAN,

Defendant, Appellee.

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

[Hon. Joseph L. Tauro, U.S. District Judge]

Before

 Lipez, Circuit Judge,

Selya, Senior Circuit Judge,

and Delgado-Colón, District Judge. *

Robert E. Richardson, Assistant United States Attorney, with

whom Michael J. Sullivan, United States Attorney, was on brief, for

appellant.

Judith H. Mizner, Federal Defender Office, with whom David A.

Ruhnke and Ruhnke & Barrett were on brief, for appellee.

September 27, 2007
-2-

Per Curiam. The district court's allowance of the

defendant's motion in limine was not an abuse of discretion and, a

fortiori, the court's denial of the ensuing motion for

reconsideration was also within its discretion. Consequently, we

affirm the rulings from which the government has appealed. The

district court may, if circumstances warrant and if the court so

elects, revisit the in limine ruling during the trial. See, e.g.,

United States v. Marino, 200 F.3d 6, 11 (1st Cir. 1999) (explaining

that "rulings on motions in limine normally are considered

provisional, in the sense that the trial court may revisit its

pretrial evidentiary rulings at retrial when an evidentiary proffer

may be more accurately assessed in the context of . . . other

evidence"). In all events, we need go no further.

Affirmed.
# C_2021252EN.01003603.xml

| 28.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/36

---

Order of the General Court of 27 April 2021 — Guillen Lazo v Parliament

(Case T-541/16) (1)

(2021/C 252/53)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 127, 20.4.2015 (case originally registered before the European Union Civil Service Tribunal under number F-22/15 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1.9.2016).

---
Case 2:05-cv-02253-LS Document 1 Filed 05/12/05 Page 1 of 12
Case 2:05-cv-02253-LS Document 1 Filed 05/12/05 Page 2 of 12
Case 2:05-cv-02253-LS Document 1 Filed 05/12/05 Page 3 of 12
Case 2:05-cv-02253-LS Document 1 Filed 05/12/05 Page 4 of 12
Case 2:05-cv-02253-LS Document 1 Filed 05/12/05 Page 5 of 12
Case 2:05-cv-02253-LS Document 1 Filed 05/12/05 Page 6 of 12
Case 2:05-cv-02253-LS Document 1 Filed 05/12/05 Page 7 of 12
Case 2:05-cv-02253-LS Document 1 Filed 05/12/05 Page 8 of 12
Case 2:05-cv-02253-LS Document 1 Filed 05/12/05 Page 9 of 12
Case 2:05-cv-02253-LS Document 1 Filed 05/12/05 Page 10 of 12
Case 2:05-cv-02253-LS Document 1 Filed 05/12/05 Page 11 of 12
Case 2:05-cv-02253-LS Document 1 Filed 05/12/05 Page 12 of 12
P.1 

OAR Box 1500 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

45) ll-C-71 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 8/5/2008 1:51:28 PM Sheet 45 of 343 
P.2 

' V rf 

,^3,, 

/ 

EHOEZJC J i 

&rs 

*$ 

I~~1 PACIFIC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES. INC. 

*?1-W 

Central Park West 

5001 South Miami Boulevard, Suite 300 

P.O. Box 12077 

Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2077 

(919) 941-0333 

FAX (919) 941-0234 

FAX COMMUNICATION A-94f52 

Date: 0 6/n/<n fyfa'C* OH O^jl^l^t/ 

FROM: flfs/4r?tf f"Q c +° 

TO: 

« y 

Name: 

Address: (Cy fe-c Ji <&*-? Jy'' J 

Robj^j Lsi-ll^an JJWZ Vs/ftUtc- ft"*M 

rS^-yy S h^'j OH 

Phone Number: 

FAX NUMBER: . 

If/1) 171-1+11 

(f/f) $7't-f+fH 

REFERENCE CODE: W°l. °*° 

THIS COMMUNICATION COMPRISES _____ 

COMMENTS: Tts-w /f^. ^S/Jz***,** ; 

PAGES INCLUDING THIS PAGE. 

^jfihnjf thatyon $y?S>?/ <?6's oc$s>>~n <^yjsc(s $0^^ 

tyiUiabt's -fo Psys$*r?/ a^y /*?Jo^m*fc^ yh#/j/oc, 

ah 

WASHINGTON. D.C. • RESEARCH TRIANQLE PARK. NC • LOS ANQELES. CA • CINCINNATI. OH 
P.3 

Step 1 Convert Average Emission of 1.92 lb/hr Measured as Prop^e to lb/hr of Stvrene 

(see Result Table 1 from November 1996 Source Test Reporfl: 

Average concentration as prop^e: 164 ppm 

Average concentration converted to styrene: 164 ppm * 3/8 = 61.5 ppm 

THC Mass Rate in terms of styrene (lb/scf): 

lb/scf = (Cgas * MW) / (385.3 * 10

 A 6) 

lb/scf = (61.5 * 104.14) / (385.3 * 10

 A 6) 

lb/scf=1.66*10A-5 

Cgas = Average gas concentration (ppm) 

MW = Molecular weight of pollutant, 104.14 lb/mol for styrene 

385.3 = Molecular volume of 1 pound mole of air at standard conditions 

(scf/lb mol) 

10

 A 6 = Conversion factor for ppm 

THC Emission Rate in terms of styrene (lb/hr): 

lb/hr = lb/scf* scfm* 60 

lb/hr = (1.66 * 10

 A-5) * 1,709 * 60 

lb/hr =1.70 

Step 2 Convert Stvrene Emissions from lb/hr to lb/ton of Resin plus Added HAP Used 

(see Appendix D of Source Test Reports 

Resin use plus added HAP: X lb/batch 

Average batch length: Y hr 

Resin plus added HAP use (lb/hr): 

lb/hr = (lb/batch) / (hr/batch) 

lb/hr = X/Y 

lb/hr = Z 

Styrene emissions (lb/ton of resin plus added HAP): 

lb/ton = (lb/hr of emissions) / (lb/hr of resin plus HAP) * (2,000 lb/ton) 

lb/ton =1.70/Z* 2,000 

lb/ton = W 

1, 
P.4 

Step 3 Determine Stvrene Emissions in Terms of lb/ton of Resin Plus Added HAP for 

Cvtec's Best Mixer fsee last Page of Attachment 1 ofthe Site Visit Reporfl: 

Average emissions from Cytec's best mixer for the same product tested on the 100 gallon 

mixer during the November 1996 source test: 0.0024 (lb VOC emitted/lb VOC used) 

lb VOC emitted/lb VOC used during the source test ofthe 100 gallon mixer: 

lb VOC emitted = 1.70 lb/hr (see Step 1) 

Total VOC used (lb/hr): 

lb/hr = (lb/batch) / (hr/batch) 

lb/hr = Q/Y 

lb/hr = V 

lb VOC emitted/lb VOC used = 1.70 / V 

lb VOC emitted/lb VOC used = T 

Emission Ratio in terms lb VOC emitted/lb VOC used of Cytec's 100 gallon mixer and 

Cytec's best mixer: 

Ratio (100 gallon/best mixer) = T / 0.0024 

Ratio (100 gallon/best mixer) = U 

Styrene emissions in terms of lb/ton of resin plus added HAP for Cytec's best mixer: 

lb/ton = W/U 

lb/ton=R
VUE, Inc.

6956 East Broad Street, Suite 239 Columbus, OH 43213 Phone (614) 883 - 5700 Fax (614) 883 - 5701 Cell (614) 595 - 5300 m riley2003@yahoo.com U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Operations West Building Ground Floor Room W12 - 140 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 March 21, 2013 Exemption No. 9917A Regulatory Docket No. FAA- 2009 - 0373 VUE, Inc . is requesting an amendment to Exemption Number 9917A, Regulatory Docket Number (FAA - 2009 - 0373) under part 14 CFR part 91. We are requesti ng that a PPE (Pilot Proficiency Examiner) be allowed to conduct the required test for the Single Pilot Exemption No. 9917A. Below you will see the exact changes we are requesting for Exemption Number 9917A, Regulatory Docket Number (FAA2009 - 0373). 6 . C. ii. Changed to

By an appropriately rated FAA- DPE (D esignated P ilot E xaminer ) , PPE (Pilot Proficiency Examiner) or an FAA inspector who is qualified and authorized to conduct test in the Cessna 500 series airplanes; 10. b. Changed to

The applicant will be restricted from performing circling approaches as PIC when weather conditions are less than basic visual flight rules weather minimums until the circling approaches have been satisfactorily demonstrated in an actual airplane or simulator qualified for the circling maneuver to a n FAA- DPE (Designated Pilot Examiner), PPE (Pilot Proficiency Examiner) or an FAA inspector. Due to the current budget crisis involving the sequester, this amendment will save time and money by using a larger group of inspe ctors, and for the private sector to cover the cost of check rides when appropriate. Thank you for all your support to us in the field Mike Riley Director
# AERIAL

U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System 1200 NeNv .lersey Ave., SE 1Vashington, DC 20590

A ug. 03, 2015
Re: Amendment to Exemption 11594 issued pursuant to Section 333 of the FAA Reform Act and Part 1 1 of the Federal Aviation Regulations in Re

~ .;ulatory Docket No. FAA-2015-0480.

Dear Sir or Madam; Pictorvision Inc. Nvas issued an Exemption numbered 11594 (hereinafler the Exemption) for the purpose of conducting scripted, closed-set filming for the motion picture and television industry. RDX Aerial Media, LLC. herby requests an amendment to the Exemption to allow 2 additional models of unmanned aircraft system (UAS) that fully complies Nvith the conditions of the Exernption, and to also allow the use of all their UAS systems for Aerial Data Collection. RDX Aerial Media, LLC. wishes to operate three additional variations of the sUAS (models number ALTA, AERIGON and Sensurion MAGPIE under the same terms and conditlons contalned ln the E`Cemptlon. Attached hereto, and submitted asa confidential document, is the Flight Operations and Procedures Manua) (FOPM) for the additional UAS. AII operations ofthe additional UAS will be in full compliance with the terrns of the Exernption. As this is an amendrnent to an existing eaemption asl:ing fvr the addition of 3 similar models of unmanned aerial vehicle and to alloNv Aerial Data Collection and Closed set operations, RDX Aerial respectfully submits that good cause exists so that notice does not need to be published in the Federal Register for the requested amendment. Please contact the undersigned should you have any question concerning this request for an amendment to the Exemption. Sincerely yours,



# ~ ~ Patrick Morehead Co-ONvner RDX Aerial Media, LLC. 424-258-4014

10920 Painis Blvd. Uitiit 207, Los Angeics, Ci{ iifoE•nia 90034 P:424-258-4M %vw1,1l.RDXAeria1.con)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CRIMINAL NO. 05-56-01

 :

v. : CIVIL NO. 10-6836

 :

TEDDY YOUNG :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 24th day of October, 2013, upon consideration of Defendant Teddy 

Young’s motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc. # 750) and all responses and replies thereto, 

it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED.

BY THE COURT:

 /s/ Lawrence F. Stengel

LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J.
APPENDIX -C

MICHAEL R FOYTHO

MONTHLY MAINTENANCE LOG

UAS #________________________ MONTH____________ YEAR__________

System Date

Discovered Issue Description & Maintenance performed Date

Corrected Maintenance performed by:

Print & Sign

Software Update

Airframe

Engine

Propellers

Camera Gimbal

Landing Gear

Vibration / Dampening

Other: