Staff Report 

ARB Review of 

San Joaquin Valley PM2.5

State Implementation Plan

Release Date: April 20, 2015

Hearing Date: May 21, 2015
Electronic copies of this report are online 

at http://www.arb.ca.gov/planning/sip/planarea/sanjqnvllysip.htm. Alternatively, paper 

copies may be obtained from the Visitors and Environmental Services Center of the Air 

Resources Board, located at 1001 I Street, Sacramento, California 95814, or by 

contacting ARB’s Office of Communications at (916) 322-2990.

For individuals with sensory disabilities, this document is available in Braille, large print, 

audiocassette, or compact disc. Please contact ARB’s Disability Coordinator at (916) 

323-4916 by voice or through the California Relay Services at 711 to place your request 

for disability services. If you are a person with limited English and would like to request 

interpreter services, please contact ARB’s Bilingual Manager at (916) 323-7053.

This document has been prepared by the staff of the Air Resources Board. Publication 

does not signify that the contents reflect the views and policies of the Air Resources 

Board, nor do trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or 

recommendation for use.

For questions, contact:

Webster Tasat, Manager

Central Valley Air Quality Planning Section 

Air Resources Board

P.O. Box 2815

Sacramento, CA 95812

Phone: (916) 323-4950

Email: wtasat@arb.ca.gov

Or 

Patricia Velasco, Ph.D.

Staff Air Pollution Specialist

Central Valley Air Quality Planning Section

Phone: (916) 323-7560

Emai: pvelasco@arb.ca.gov
TABLE OF CONTENTS

I. OVERVIEW.............................................................................................................. 3

A. Nature of PM2.5 Air Quality in the Valley ............................................................. 3

B. Impact of Drought on PM2.5 Attainment............................................................... 5

C. New Planning Process Requirements .................................................................. 7

II. ATTAINMENT DEMONSTRATION ......................................................................... 7

A. Modeling Methodology ......................................................................................... 8

B. Attainment Emission Levels.................................................................................. 9

C. Results ............................................................................................................... 10

D. Weight of Evidence Analysis .............................................................................. 11

E. Consideration of 2014 Air Quality....................................................................... 11

III. CONTROL STRATEGY......................................................................................... 12

A. State Mobile Source Control Program................................................................ 12

B. District Control Program ..................................................................................... 13

C. Incentive Programs............................................................................................. 13

D. Further Near-Term Emission Reductions ........................................................... 14

1. District Commitments for Further Emission Reductions.................................. 15

2. ARB Actions for Emission Reductions from the Truck Sector......................... 15

IV. CLEAN AIR ACT REQUIREMENTS ..................................................................... 17

A. Demonstration SIP Commitments have been Met.............................................. 17

B. Best Available Control Measures and Most Stringent Measures........................ 23

1. ARB Assessment............................................................................................ 23

2. District Assessment ........................................................................................ 24

C. Emissions Inventory ........................................................................................... 25

D. Reasonable Further Progress and Quantitative Milestones ............................... 25

E. Contingency Measures....................................................................................... 26

F. Transportation Conformity Budgets.................................................................... 27

V. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ................................................................................. 28

A. Introduction......................................................................................................... 28

B. Analysis .............................................................................................................. 28

VI. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION................................................................ 29

APPENDIX A: Weight of Evidence Analysis
APPENDIX B: Documentation on Additional Emission Reductions Achieved 

Towards Meeting Aggregate Commitments
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This report provides ARB staff’s assessment of the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution 

Control District’s (District) 2015 PM2.5 State Implementation Plan (2015 PM2.5 SIP) 

revision. The SIP revision was developed to address increased PM2.5 concentrations 

that occurred due to weather conditions associated with California’s historic drought. 

These drought conditions have increased the challenge of meeting federal PM2.5 

standards in the Valley, a region that already experiences the highest PM2.5 

concentrations in the nation. While the Valley had attained the 24-hour standard and 

been nearing attainment of the annual standard1 set in 1997, the impacts of the drought 

have increased PM2.5 levels to an extent that the Valley can no longer attain by the 

2015 statutory deadline. 

In 2008, the San Joaquin Valley adopted a SIP to meet the 1997 PM2.5 standards. The 

U.S Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) approved the SIP in 2011. The SIP 

control strategy focused on reducing directly emitted PM2.5, oxides of nitrogen (NOx), 

and oxides of sulfur (SOx). Through ongoing implementation of this control strategy, 

PM2.5 air quality in the Valley had been improving, with annual PM2.5 levels 

decreasing over 30 percent between 2001 and 2012. The Valley had met the 24-hour 

standard of 65 μg/m3 in 2010, and by 2012 only a few sites remained above the annual 

standard of 15 μg/m3

. However, the stagnant weather conditions and persistent lack of 

rainfall associated with the drought substantially increased PM2.5 levels in 2013, 

impacting both 24-hour and annual average concentrations. These conditions pushed 

most sites in the central and southern Valley back over the annual standard, and 

increased 24-hour concentrations in several locations to at or near the 65 

μg/m3 standard. 

Because the Valley can no longer feasibly attain the standards by 2015, the District has 

prepared an updated plan to demonstrate attainment by the most expeditious timeframe 

possible. This plan is designed to account for the potential that these adverse 

meteorological conditions may occur again in the future. The new attainment 

demonstration uses the approved modeling contained in the 2008 PM2.5 SIP, coupled 

with air quality data reflecting the impacts of the drought in 2013, and emission 

reductions expected through 2020, which will put the Valley on a path to meet these 

standards over the next five years. 

The attainment demonstration includes the benefits of ARB and District control 

programs that provide significant ongoing emission reductions. Continued 

implementation of these control programs provides new emission reductions each year, 

resulting in a 38 percent decrease in NOx emissions and an eight percent decrease in 

PM2.5 emissions between 2012 and 2020. NOx reductions result from ongoing 

implementation of both new vehicle standards for passenger and heavy-duty diesel 

vehicles and equipment, rules accelerating the turnover of legacy diesel fleets, and 

District rules addressing stationary source NOx emissions. PM2.5 emission reductions 

1 To protect against the adverse health impacts of exposure to PM2.5, U.S. EPA first set PM2.5 air quality 

standards in 1997, adopting an annual standard of 15 μg/m3

, and a 24-hour PM2.5 standard of 65 μg/m3

1

 
are the result of ongoing implementation of diesel on- and off-road equipment measures 

as well as the District’s recently strengthened rule for wood-burning fireplaces and 

heaters. These measures, along with additional reductions from enhancements to the 

District’s commercial charbroiling rule slated for adoption in 2016 provide the necessary 

control strategy. As a result, the modeling demonstrates the Valley will be below the 

24-hour standard by 2018, and attain the annual standard at all sites by 2020. 

The 2015 PM2.5 SIP addresses the planning requirements specified under Subpart 4 of 

the Clean Air Act (Act) that allows for an attainment date extension to 2020. Under 

these provisions, the 2015 SIP includes a demonstration that most stringent measures 

are in place and that all commitments included in the 2008 SIP have been fulfilled. 

Additional Act requirements addressed in the 2015 SIP include reasonable further 

progress with corresponding milestones, transportation conformity and contingency

measures.

In addition, because of the request for an attainment date extension, the SIP revision 

identifies a number of efforts to achieve further near-term emission reductions beyond 

those from the existing control programs. These efforts include a District commitment to 

provide targeted incentive funding for the purchase of cleaner heavy-duty trucks and 

woodstove replacements, and ARB actions for heavy-duty trucks that focus on cleaner 

combustion technologies, as well as introduction of zero and near-zero emission 

equipment. The District has also committed to evaluate the potential for further 

emission reductions from rules that address agricultural conservation management 

practices, flares, and hot mix asphalt. 

Finally, under the Act, U.S. EPA is also required to periodically review air quality 

standards and the latest health science. Based on this assessment, U.S. EPA has 

further strengthened the PM2.5 standards, lowering the 24-hour standard to 35 μg/m3 in 

2006, and the annual standard to 12 μg/m3 in 2012. New SIPs for these standards will 

be developed in 2016. The 2015 PM2.5 SIP revision lays out a course to provide for 

expeditious attainment of the 1997 standards by 2018 and 2020, and serves as a 

foundation for development of the 2016 SIP. The 2016 SIP will include a 

comprehensive assessment of the emission reductions and timeframe needed for 

attainment, and will identify further control measures. As part of this effort, ARB and 

District staff will also continue to closely monitor the ongoing drought, and its potential 

impacts on meeting the PM2.5 standards in the Valley. 

2
I. OVERVIEW

Exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) is associated with increased risk of 

hospitalization for lung and heart-related illnesses and premature mortality, especially in

children, the elderly, and people with existing health problems. The Clean Air Act (Act) 

requires the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) to establish national 

ambient air quality standards to protect public health and regularly update them to 

reflect new health information. U.S. EPA first established a PM2.5 standard in 1997, a 

24-hour PM2.5 standard of 65 micrograms per cubic meter (μg/m3

) and an annual 

standard of 15 μg/m3. Based on an extensive assessment and scientific review of the 

health impacts of PM2.5 pollution, the 24-hour PM2.5 standard was strengthened to 

35 μg/m3 in 2006 and the annual standard was strengthened to 12 μg/m3 in 2012. 

Meeting these standards provides critical public health protection, especially in the San 

Joaquin Valley which experiences the highest PM2.5 levels in the nation. 

In April 2008, the District adopted a State Implementation Plan (2008 PM2.5 SIP) that

set out a strategy to attain the 1997 standards by April 2015. This SIP was approved by 

U.S. EPA in 2011. A SIP to meet the revised 24-hour standard of 35 μg/m3 was 

adopted in late 2012, and the SIP for the revised annual standard of 12 μg/m3 will be 

developed in 2016. Each SIP serves as a building block to ensure incremental progress 

toward successively more stringent standards over time. 

Through ongoing implementation of the control strategy in the 2008 PM2.5 SIP, the 

Valley had met the 24-hour PM2.5 standard, and was nearing attainment of the annual 

standard. However, due to adverse weather conditions associated with California’s 

severe drought, PM2.5 levels increased substantially in 2013, affecting both 24-hour 

and annual average concentrations. As a result, the San Joaquin Valley will not meet 

the 2015 attainment deadline approved by U.S. EPA. The District has therefore 

adopted a SIP revision that demonstrates that the emission reductions that will occur 

over the next five years will place the Valley on a path towards expeditious attainment of 

the 1997 standards by 2020. The following sections provide an overview of the nature 

of the PM2.5 challenge in the San Joaquin Valley, the impacts of the drought, and the 

planning requirements associated with development of a new SIP to address these 

challenges.

A. Nature of PM2.5 Air Quality in the Valley

PM2.5 is a complex mixture of many different species generated from a wide array of 

emission sources. PM2.5 may be emitted directly into the air in the form of soot, 

smoke, or dust, or can be formed in the atmosphere as secondary particles from the 

reactions of precursor gases, including NOx, SOx, volatile organic compounds (VOC), 

and ammonia. The relative mixture of these constituents in a region drives the nature of 

the needed control strategy.

The San Joaquin Valley, encompassing 25,000 square miles in the central portion of 

California, is characterized by unique topography and meteorology. Together with the 

3
Valley’s topography, the inversion-prone meteorology of the region restricts airflow and 

favors the accumulation of pollutants. Valley weather patterns are typically 

characterized by dry summers with moist winter months, which often include periods of 

heavy fog.

PM2.5 concentrations in the Valley exhibit a strong seasonal pattern, with the highest 

concentrations between November and February during extended periods of stagnant 

weather. These conditions are conducive to the buildup of PM2.5 over multiple days, as 

well as the formation of secondary ammonium nitrate. Episodic activities such as 

seasonal wood burning also add to the pollution burden during the winter. These 

elevated wintertime concentrations in turn drive annual average levels. PM2.5 

concentrations are higher in the central and southern portions of the Valley, with highest 

values recorded in the urban areas of Fresno and Bakersfield.

The results of extensive research studies and comprehensive air quality modeling have 

been used to understand the types of sources contributing to PM2.5 and quantify the 

relative effectiveness of reducing each PM2.5 precursor. Organic and elemental carbon 

and ammonium nitrate are the largest contributors to both 24-hour and annual average 

concentrations in the Valley, accounting for approximately 70 to 90 percent of the total 

mass. The major sources of organic and elemental carbon in the Valley are mobile 

sources, residential wood burning, and commercial cooking. Modeling efforts have

demonstrated directly emitted PM2.5 emission reductions provide significant benefit in 

reducing ambient PM2.5 concentrations, with organic and elemental carbon 

concentrations decreasing between 15 and 30 percent between 2004 and 2012.

Ammonium nitrate is formed in the atmosphere from chemical reactions of NOx, VOCs, 

and ammonia. It is therefore important to understand which precursor controls are most 

effective in reducing ammonium nitrate concentrations. Evaluation of both emissions 

inventory and monitoring data suggest that in the Valley’s ammonia-rich conditions, 

NOx, rather than ammonia controls are more effective in reducing PM2.5 

concentrations. This strong linkage between NOx emission reductions and decreases in 

ammonium nitrate concentrations is illustrated in Figure 1 for the Bakersfield and 

Fresno monitoring sites. Between 2004 and 2012, Valleywide NOx emissions were 

reduced approximately 40 percent, with a commensurate reduction in ammonium nitrate 

concentrations.

4
Figure 1. NOx Emissions vs Ammonium Nitrate Trends at Bakersfield and Fresno

In addition, air quality modeling has shown that while large reductions in NOx lead to 

similar reductions in ammonium nitrate, comparable reductions in ammonia are much 

less effective. During the winter months, reductions in NOx are approximately an order 

of magnitude more effective than reductions in ammonia on a per ton basis, with an 

even greater differential on an annual average basis. Finally, air quality modeling has 

indicated that VOC emission reductions produce no PM2.5 benefit. 

Based on this understanding of the nature of PM2.5 in the Valley, the SIP control 

strategy has focused on reducing directly emitted PM2.5, NOx, and SOx emissions. 

Through ongoing implementation of this multi-pollutant control approach, the Valley was 

making substantial progress towards attainment of the 1997 standards. Between 2001 

and 2012, 24-hour concentrations had decreased almost 40 percent, and annual 

concentrations had decreased over 30 percent. As a result, the Valley had attained the 

24-hour standard of 65 μg/m3 in 2010, and by 2012, only a few sites remained over the 

annual standard of 15 μg/m3

. Further discussion of the nature of PM2.5 air quality in 

the Valley, precursor effectiveness, and air quality progress is provided in Appendix A.

B. Impact of Drought on PM2.5 Attainment

Beginning in 2013, persistently high atmospheric pressure over the northeastern Pacific 

Ocean prevented winter storms from reaching the west coast, resulting in severe 

drought conditions in California. The stagnant weather conditions and lack of rainfall

during the winter of 2013/14 drove an increase in PM2.5 levels in all three regions of the 

Valley. Due to nearly two months without rainfall, a majority of days during December 

2013 and January 2014 recorded PM2.5 concentrations greater than the 35 μg/m3 24-

5
hour standard, a nearly threefold increase over the prior winter. These elevated 

wintertime concentrations affected both 24-hour and annual average design values, 

especially in the central and southern Valley. 

Figure 2 illustrates the trend in annual PM2.5 design values at three sites representing 

the northern, central, and southern portions of the Valley. Design values are used for 

SIP planning purposes, and are calculated as a three-year average. While annual 

PM2.5 concentrations have been decreasing over time, Figure 2 highlights the

considerable year-to-year variability that occurs in the Valley. Catastrophic wildfires that 

occurred throughout northern California in 2008 for example affected design values for

2008-2010.

Figure 2. Valley PM2.5 Annual Design Value Trends

Due to the weather conditions associated with the drought, from 2012 to 2013, design 

values increased up to 15 percent at Valley locations. While sites in the northern Valley 

remained below the standard, most sites in the central and southern Valley were 

pushed back over the annual standard, and 24-hour design values at several locations 

increased to at or near the 65 μg/m3 standard. The impact of large-scale events such 

as wildfires and the drought underscore the challenge of meeting PM2.5 standards in 

the Valley. 

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

PM2.5 Design Value (μg/m3)

PM2.5 Annual Design Values

Modesto

Fresno

Bakersfield-CA

15 ug/m3 Standard

6
C. New Planning Process Requirements

In light of a recent court decision, U.S. EPA has begun implementing PM2.5 standards 

under the particulate matter specific provisions of Subpart 4 of the Act. Subpart 4 

establishes a step wise process for PM2.5 planning. All PM2.5 nonattainment areas are 

initially classified as moderate. Nonattainment areas that cannot demonstrate 

attainment by the moderate area attainment deadline can request a reclassification to

serious. Finally, if needed, a serious area can request a five year extension if they have 

met all of their moderate and serious SIP obligations, along with a demonstration the 

SIP includes the most stringent measures available or in practice in any other state.

In light of the new classification requirements under Subpart 4, as a first step U.S. EPA 

classified all areas as moderate on June 2, 2014. However, as a result of the increase 

in PM2.5 concentrations in 2013, the San Joaquin Valley will be unable to attain the 

1997 PM2.5 standards by the initial moderate area attainment deadline of April 5, 2015. 

On September 25, 2014, the District requested a serious area classification with a 

December 31, 2015 attainment date. On March 27, 2015, U.S. EPA formally classified 

the Valley as a serious nonattainment area and provided the option to request a further

attainment date extension of up to five years. 

The District has developed the 2015 PM2.5 SIP for the 1997 standards to address the 

serious area SIP requirements along with a request for the further attainment date 

extension. The 2015 PM2.5 SIP addresses the following SIP requirements associated 

with serious area requirements and the further attainment date extension:

• Demonstrate the impracticability of the Valley attaining by the serious area 

deadline of December 31, 2015; 

• Request a serious area attainment deadline extension to December 31, 2020;

• Attain the PM2.5 standards as expeditiously as practicable;

• Include Best Available Control Measures/Best Available Control Technology 

(BACM/BACT) for serious areas;

• Include Most Stringent Measures (MSM) associated with an attainment 

deadline extension request;

II. ATTAINMENT DEMONSTRATION

ARB and District staff have prepared an updated attainment demonstration that 

provides for expeditious attainment of the standards and which is designed to account 

for adverse meteorological conditions associated with the drought should they occur 

again in the future. The new attainment demonstration uses the fundamental chemistry 

and associated response of different PM2.5 constituents to emission controls reflected 

in the approved modeling in the 2008 PM2.5 SIP. This modeling science is coupled 

7
with 2013 design values and PM2.5 chemical composition reflecting drought impacts, 

along with emission reductions expected through 2018 (attainment for the 24-hour 

standard) and 2020 (attainment for the annual standard). 

The attainment demonstration includes the benefits of ARB and District control 

programs that provide ongoing emission reductions. Continued implementation of these 

control programs provides new emission reductions each year, resulting in a forecasted 

38 percent decrease in NOx emissions and an eight percent decrease in PM2.5

emissions between 2012 and 2020. These measures, along with additional reductions 

from enhancements to the District’s commercial charbroiling rule slated for adoption in 

2016 provide the necessary control strategy. As a result, the modeling demonstrates

the Valley will be well below the 24-hour standard by 2018, and attain the annual 

standard at all sites by 2020. 

A. Modeling Methodology

The attainment demonstration approach for the current SIP is based on modeling 

conducted for the 2008 PM2.5 SIP, which addressed both the annual and 24-hour 

PM2.5 standards. The atmospheric dynamics and associated response to emission 

reductions represented in this modeling, coupled with 2013 design values and chemical 

composition, was used to project future (2020 for the annual standard and 2018 for the 

24-hour standard) design values. Photochemical modeling for the 2008 PM2.5 SIP was 

conducted following the U.S. EPA guidance (2007 U.S. EPA)2 and was approved by 

U.S. EPA in 2011 (76 FR 69896, 76 FR 41338). 

To assess the representativeness of the 2008 PM2.5 SIP modeling in relationship to the 

2013/2014 meteorological conditions, ARB staff evaluated both the meteorological 

characteristics, as well as the chemical composition used in the modeling effort. The 

types of meteorological conditions conducive to PM2.5 formation in 2013/14 were 

similar to the 2000/01 meteorological conditions simulated in the 2008 PM2.5 SIP. In 

addition, the PM2.5 chemical composition used in the 2008 PM2.5 SIP modeling was 

very similar to 2013, indicating common atmospheric chemistry regimes. Therefore, the 

2008 PM2.5 SIP modeling response to emission reductions, applied to 2013 design 

values reflecting the enhanced frequency of PM2.5 conducive conditions that occurred 

in 2013, provides a suitable basis for the updated attainment demonstration. Additional 

information on the modeling methodology is provided in Appendix F of the 2015 PM2.5 

SIP.

2 U.S. EPA, 2007, Guidance on the Use of Models and Other Analyses for Demonstrating Attainment of 

Air Quality Goals for Ozone, PM2.5, and Regional Haze, EPA-454/B07-002.

8

 
B. Attainment Emission Levels

Tables 1 and 2 list the Valley-wide emissions levels used in the annual and 24-hour 

PM2.5 attainment demonstrations, respectively. Baseline emission levels reflect the 

implementation of adopted ARB and District control measures. Three additional District 

rules that were adopted subsequent to the preparation of the baseline inventory plus 

one new commitment provide the remaining emissions reductions needed to reach the 

attainment targets. 

Table 1. Annual Average Attainment Level Emissions in tons per day (tpd)

Emission Inventory

2020 Annual Average Emissions 

(tpd)

PM2.5 NOx SOx

Baseline Emissions 62.8 206.9 7.8

Emission Reductions from District Control 

Measures

• Rule 4901 Wood Burning Fireplaces and 

Wood Burning Heaters (Adopted)

1.6 0.0 0.0

• Rule 4905 Natural Gas-Fired, Fan-Type 

Residential Central Furnaces (Adopted)

0.0 0.4 0.0

• Rule 4308 Boilers, Steam Generators, and 

Process Heaters 0.075 to <2 MMBtu/hr

(Adopted)

0.0 0.0011 0.0

• Rule 4692 Commercial Charbroiling

(Commitment)

0.4 0.0 0.0

Attainment Emission Levels 60.8 206.5 7.8

Table 2. Winter Average Attainment Level Emissions in tpd

Emission Inventory

2018 Winter Average Emissions 

(tpd)

PM2.5 NOx SOx

Baseline Emissions 57.7 213.9 7.6

Emission Reductions from District Control 

Measures

• Rule 4901 Wood Burning Fireplaces and 

Wood Burning Heaters (Adopted)

2.9 0.0 0.0

• Rule 4905 Natural Gas-Fired, Fan-Type 

Residential Central Furnaces (Adopted)

0.0 0.2 0.0

• Rule 4308 Boilers, Steam Generators, and 

Process Heaters 0.075 to <2 MMBtu/hr

(Adopted)

0.0 0.0007 0.0

• Rule 4692 Commercial Charbroiling

(Commitment)

0.4 0.0 0.0

Attainment Emission Levels 54.4 213.7 7.6

9
C. Results

Results of the attainment demonstration modeling are provided in Tables 3 and 4. All 

sites in the SJV recorded 2013 design values at or below the 24-hour standard of 

65 μg/m3. Eight of the fifteen sites in the SJV recorded 2013 design values over the 

annual PM2.5 standard of 15 μg/m3

. The higher design values occurred in the Valley’s 

southern region (including the Bakersfield and Visalia) and the central region (around 

the Fresno urban area and Madera). Only one site in the northern region (Turlock) 

measured a 2013 annual design value over the standard. 

The attainment demonstration modeling indicates that 2018 24-hour design values will 

range between 24 μg/m3 and 52 μg/m3, well below the 65 μg/m3 standard.

Further, by 2020 all sites in the Valley are projected to attain the annual standard. For 

those sites that exceeded the standard in 2013, the projected 2020 annual design 

values range from 12.5 μg/m3 to 15.0 μg/m3. 

Table 3. Modeled 2018 24-hour PM2.5 Design Values

Monitoring Site 2013 24-hour Design 

Value (μg/m3)

2018 24-hour Design 

Value (μg/m3)

Bakersfield - California Street 64.6 51.6

Bakersfield - 410 E Planz 55.8 44.9

Clovis - N Villa Avenue 57.6 45.3

Fresno - 1st Street/Garland 62.0 49.3

Fresno - Hamilton and Winer 63.5 50.3

Hanford-S Irwin Street (Visalia) 60.2 45.8

Madera 52.3 41.4

Manteca-530 Fishback Rd 36.7 32.1

Merced - 2334 M Street 49.2 40.3

Merced – S Coffee Ave 41.8 34.8

Modesto - 14th Street 50.6 42.2

Stockton - Hazelton Street 45.0 39.0

Tranquility 30.0 23.9

Turlock-S Minaret Street 52.7 43.8

Visalia - N Church Street 55.7 42.5

10
Table 4. Modeled 2020 Annual PM2.5 Design Values

Monitoring Site 2013 Annual Design 

Value (μg/m3)

2020 Annual Design 

Value (μg/m3)

Bakersfield - California Street 16.4 13.7

Bakersfield - 410 E Planz 17.0 14.3

Clovis - N Villa Avenue 16.4 13.3

Fresno - 1st Street/Garland 15.4 12.5

Fresno - Hamilton and Winery 14.7 12.0

Hanford-S Irwin Street (Visalia) 17.0 13.9

Madera 18.1 15.0

Manteca-530 Fishback Rd 10.2 8.7

Merced - 2334 M Street 11.1 9.2

Merced – S Coffee Ave 13.3 11.0

Modesto - 14th Street 13.6 11.5

Stockton - Hazelton Street 13.8 12.0

Tranquility 7.9 6.6

Turlock-S Minaret Street 15.7 13.2

Visalia - N Church Street 16.6 13.5

D. Weight of Evidence Analysis

U.S. EPA’s modeling guidance requires that the modeled attainment demonstration be 

accompanied by a weight of evidence analysis to provide a set of complementary 

analyses. Examining an air quality problem in a variety of ways provides a more 

informed basis for the attainment strategy as well as a better understanding of the 

overall problem and the level and mix of emissions controls needed for attainment. 

Appendix A provides the weight of evidence analysis prepared by ARB staff. 

Following U.S. EPA guidance, this includes assessment of trends in air quality and 

emissions, source-receptor models and other diagnostic analyses, additional modeling 

evaluations, and description of a conceptual model of PM2.5 in the Valley. The weight 

of evidence analysis draws upon the wealth of data collected in the Valley over the 

years, both from the routine monitoring network, as well as special studies. This 

assessment demonstrated the ongoing effectiveness of reductions in NOx and directly 

emitted PM2.5 in reducing PM2.5 in the Valley. The substantial continuing reductions 

that will result from implementation of the ongoing control program are consistent with 

past progress, and the results predicted in the modeled attainment demonstration.

E. Consideration of 2014 Air Quality

The drought-related meteorological conditions that affected PM2.5 concentrations in the 

San Joaquin Valley during 2013 continued into 2014. Although complete data for 2014 

is not yet available, this section provides a preliminary assessment of 2014 air quality 

data in relation to the attainment demonstration. 

11
Despite the ongoing persistence of the drought, air quality conditions in 2014 generally 

improved at most locations, particularly in the northern and central portions of the 

Valley. This is an indication that although drought conditions are continuing, progress is 

resuming as a result of ongoing emission reductions. However, because 2014 design 

values will reflect the impact of multiple years of drought, a comparison to the 2013 

design values used in the attainment demonstration is expected to be mixed, with some 

locations recording design values that are slightly lower, and other locations recording 

design values that are slightly higher. Based on an assessment of the PM2.5 levels 

predicted for 2020 as well as ongoing trends and analyses, consideration of 2014 

design values is expected to remain consistent with the current attainment 

demonstration. However, ARB and the District will continue to monitor the impacts of 

the drought and its relationship to future PM2.5 attainment needs.

III. CONTROL STRATEGY

Attainment of the PM2.5 standard in the Valley will require the combined efforts of ARB, 

federal, and District control programs. The following sections highlight ARB’s ongoing 

control programs and District control measures that provide the emission reductions 

included in the attainment demonstration.

A. State Mobile Source Control Program

California has a long history of developing and implementing regulations to reduce 

emissions from on-road and off-road sources, which has resulted in the strongest 

mobile source control program in the nation. Several key recent regulatory efforts

include the Advanced Clean Cars (ACC) program, the Cleaner In-Use Heavy-Duty 

Truck Regulation, and the Off-Road Regulation. Together, these programs are 

providing significant reductions in NOx and diesel particulate matter through 2020 and 

beyond. 

The ACC program, approved in January 2012, is a suite of regulations that addresses

both ambient air quality needs and climate change goals. The ACC program combines 

the control of smog and PM2.5 causing pollutants, and greenhouse gas emissions, into 

a package of requirements for passenger car model years 2015 through 2025. In 2025, 

cars under the ACC program will emit 75 percent less smog-forming pollution than the 

average new car sold in 2012. 

The Truck and Bus Regulation addresses the need to reduce emissions from older, 

high-emitting, heavy-duty trucks with long service lives. The regulation represents a 

multi-year effort to turn over the legacy fleet of engines and replace them with the 

cleanest technology available. Starting in 2012, the Truck and Bus Regulation phases 

in requirements so that by 2014, nearly all vehicles operating in California will have PM 

emission controls, and by 2023 nearly all vehicles will meet 2010 model year engine 

emissions levels. 

12
The Off-Road Regulation is designed to accelerate the penetration of the cleanest 

equipment into California’s fleets and significantly reduce emissions of diesel particulate 

matter and NOx from the over 150,000 in-use off-road diesel vehicles that operate in 

California by requiring their owners to modernize their fleets and install exhaust retrofits. 

The regulation affects dozens of vehicle types used in thousands of fleets by requiring 

owners to modernize their fleets by replacing older engines or vehicles with newer, 

cleaner models, retiring older vehicles or using them less often, or by applying retrofit 

exhaust controls. 

B. District Control Program

Comprehensive stationary and area source controls adopted by the District provide 

additional emission reductions that are an important element of the attainment strategy. 

Recent District rules are highlighted in Table 5. Compliance dates for these measures 

are intended to provide early emission reductions. 

In 2014, the District strengthened the residential wood burning curtailment program 

under Rule 4901. Per rule requirements, the District prohibits use of wood-burning 

heaters and wood burning fireplaces when PM2.5 air quality is forecast to be above 

20 μg/m3

. The District Burn Cleaner incentive program combined with the tiered 

compliance threshold in the rule allows additional burn days for District registered 

U.S. EPA certified devices (up to forecasted PM2.5 level of 65 μg/m3) to encourage the 

change-out of high-polluting devices and open-hearth fireplaces to cleaner devices. 

Other District rules reduce NOx emissions from residential central furnaces; boilers, 

steam generators and process heaters; glass melting furnaces; internal combustion 

engines; stationary gas turbines; residential water heaters; school bus fleets; and 

employer-based trip reduction. The glass melting furnaces rule also reduces SOx and 

PM2.5.

Finally, in 2016 the District is scheduled to expand the scope of Rule 4692 for 

commercial charbroiling to include under-fired charbroilers, with an expected 2017 

compliance date. Research and demonstration projects evaluating the applicability of 

control technologies are currently underway.

C. Incentive Programs

In addition to these regulatory efforts, ARB and the District implement incentive 

programs that invest significant amounts of funding to accelerate the purchase of 

cleaner technologies beyond those achieved by regulations alone. Combined, 

California’s incentive programs have provided hundreds of millions of dollars dedicated 

to reducing emissions from both on- and off-road vehicles and equipment. Two of the 

largest programs are the Proposition 1B (Prop 1B): Goods Movement Emission 

Reduction Program, and the Carl Moyer Memorial Air Quality Standards Attainment 

Program (Moyer). Eligible projects span the mobile source sector, and include cleaner 

on-road and off-road vehicles and equipment, marine, locomotive, lawn and garden, 

light-duty passenger vehicles, and agricultural equipment. The District also derives 

13
additional funding for incentive programs from Motor Vehicle Surcharge Fees, the 

District’s Indirect Source Rule, and Voluntary Emission Reduction Agreements. In the 

2014/2015 fiscal year budget, the District authorized $156 million in incentive funding 

from local, State, and federal funding sources. 

Table 5. Recently Adopted District Rules.

Rule 

#

Adopted District Rule Adoption/

Amendment 

Date

Compliance 

Date

4707 Boilers, Steam Generators, and 

Process Heaters - 2.0 MMBtu/hr 

to 5.0 MMBtu/hr

5/19/11 Final 2015

4308 Boilers, Steam Generators, and 

Process Heaters –

0.075 MMBtu/hr to less than 2.0 

MMBtu/hr

11/14/13 Initial 2015

4311 Flares 6/18/09 Full 2017

4320 Advanced Emission Reduction 

Options for Boilers, Steam 

Generators, and Process 

Heaters Greater than 5.0 

MMBtu/hr 

10/16/08 Final 2014

4354 Glass Melting Furnaces 5/19/11 Final 2014

4702 Internal Combustion Engines 8/18/11

4703 Stationary Gas Turbines 9/20/07 Full 2012

4901 Wood Burning Fireplaces and 

Woodburning Heaters

9/18/14 Start 2014

4902 Residential Water Heaters 3/19/09 2010-2012

4905 Natural Gas-Fired, Fan-Type 

Central Furnaces

1/22/15 2015 – 2018

Full 2036

9310 School Bus Fleets

(Diesel -- meet ARB and EPA 

emission standards)

9/21/06 2016

9410 Employer-based Trip Reduction 12/17/09 2010-2015

D. Further Near-Term Emission Reductions

As discussed in the Overview section, in response to the increasing body of evidence 

regarding the adverse impacts of exposure to PM2.5, U.S. EPA has further 

strengthened the PM2.5 standards, lowering the 24-hour standard to 35 μg/m3 in 2006, 

and the annual standard to 12 μg/m3 in 2012. New SIPs for these standards will be 

developed in 2016, as well as for the revised 8-hour ozone standard of 75 parts per 

billion. These SIPs will include a comprehensive assessment of the reductions and 

timeframe necessary for attainment of the more health protective standards. However, 

in light of the request for an attainment date extension, as well as the need to continue 

14
to accelerate progress towards attainment of all of the standards, the 2015 PM2.5 SIP 

identifies a number of efforts to achieve further near-term emission reductions.

1. District Commitments for Further Emission Reductions

As part of the 2015 PM2.5 SIP, the District has committed to providing targeted 

incentive funding for two key categories - heavy-duty trucks and woodstoves. This 

includes a commitment to allocate $10 million between 2016 and 2020 for the 

replacement of heavy-duty trucks in the Valley, achieving additional NOx and PM2.5 

emission reductions. The District also commits to allocating $7.5 million for the 

replacement of old high polluting wood burning devices between 2016 and 2020 to 

achieve additional PM2.5 emission reductions. In addition, the District has committed to 

evaluate the potential for further emission reductions from rules that address 

conservation management practices, flares, and hot mix asphalt. The District commits 

to conduct the evaluations described below and to include any identified additional 

actions for reducing emissions and implementation schedules in the 2016 SIP for the 

revised annual PM2.5 standard. 

a) Rule 4311—Flares

The District commits to undertaking a comprehensive review of flare minimization plans 

submitted under Rule 4311. The District intends to conduct the evaluation and have a 

draft report available for public review and comment by December 01, 2015. After 

addressing public comments, the District commits to finalize this report by 

March 31, 2016. 

b) Warm Mix Asphalt

The District commits to a number of actions to evaluate and promote the use of warm 

mix asphalt in the Valley. The District intends to conduct the evaluation and have a 

draft report available for public review and comment by December 01, 2015. After 

addressing public comments, the District commits to finalize this report by 

March 31, 2016. 

c) Rule 4550—Conservation Management Practices

The District commits to conduct an evaluation of Rule 4550 and have a draft report 

available for public review and comment by May 31, 2016. After addressing public 

comments, the District commits to finalize this report by October 31, 2016. 

2. ARB Actions for Emission Reductions from the Truck Sector

Ongoing NOx and diesel PM reductions from mobile sources are a key focus of the 

control strategy to bring the San Joaquin Valley into attainment of federal PM2.5 

standards. Within the mobile source sector, heavy-duty trucks represent the largest 

source of both NOx and diesel PM emissions in the Valley. Recognizing the critical 

need to continue to clean up the heavy-duty diesel fleet, ARB is taking a number of 

15
additional actions to further reduce emissions and provide ongoing benefits in the 

Valley. These efforts are outlined in the recently released sustainable freight report 

which sets out ARB’s vision for a clean freight system, together with the immediate and 

near-term steps that ARB will take to support use of zero and near-zero emission 

technology. These ARB actions related to the heavy-duty truck sector provide 

additional emission reductions in the Valley and ensure progress towards attainment of 

the PM2.5 standards. Further description of the proposed actions is provided below. 

California’s Truck and Bus Regulation targeting emission reductions from the nearly one 

million existing diesel trucks and buses that operate on California roads each year is 

one of the most important components of ARB’s program to reduce emissions from 

diesel vehicles. This comprehensive program is intended to significantly reduce 

emissions from existing diesel vehicles throughout the State through a mix of exhaust 

and vehicle retrofits and vehicle turnover to the cleanest technologies. Over the next 

five years implementation of the Truck and Bus Regulation will reduce NOx emissions 

by 34 percent, and diesel PM emissions by 78 percent, with 2020 emission reductions 

of 17.6 tpd of NOx and 1.7 tpd of PM2.5. 

As part of ARB’s sustainable freight report, ARB has identified a number of immediate 

actions to continue to reduce emissions and health risk from heavy-duty trucks. These 

include focused enforcement efforts related to compliance with the Truck and Bus 

Regulation, as well as opportunities to leverage resources by utilizing agreements with 

local air districts. Other near-term efforts proposed focus on cleaner combustion 

technologies, as well as introduction of zero and near-zero emission equipment. These 

include development of strategies to ensure durability and in-use performance. These 

efforts will focus on enhanced truck inspection and maintenance programs, new 

certification and warranty requirements, and provisions to ensure proper repairs are 

conducted. Strategies will also be developed to increase the flexibility for 

manufacturers to certify advanced truck engines and vehicle systems to provide for 

accelerated introduction of cleaner new technologies into the market. 

Incentive programs also play an important role in achieving additional emission 

reductions from the current on-road fleet beyond current regulatory requirements, as 

well as transitioning from current technologies to zero and near-zero technologies. 

Because trucks used in the agricultural industry are an important sector in the Valley, 

ARB proposes to partner with the Valley Air District to focus investments for agricultural 

trucks to accelerate turn over to cleaner engines. ARB’s Air Quality Improvement 

Program (AQIP) and Low Carbon Transportation Investments are additional incentive 

programs that are designed to support the development and commercialization of 

advanced technologies. Statewide, more than $220 million has been allocated for fiscal 

years 2014/2015 and 2015/2016 projects. As part of these programs ARB will pursue 

opportunities to focus Valley funding on projects related to traditional Hybrid and ZeroEmission Truck and Bus Voucher Incentive Projects, zero-emission truck and bus pilot 

projects, and advanced technology freight demonstration projects. 

16
IV. CLEAN AIR ACT REQUIREMENTS

In addition to the elements related to the attainment demonstration, the Act also 

requires SIPs for serious PM2.5 nonattainment areas requesting an attainment date 

extension to address the following requirements:

• Demonstration that the State complied with all requirements and commitments 

pertaining to the area in the SIP;

• Provisions to assure that the best available control measures/best available 

control technology (BACM/BACT) for the control of PM2.5 and PM2.5 precursors 

be implemented no later than four years after area reclassification to serious;

• The SIP includes the most stringent measures (MSM) that are included in the 

implementation plan of any state or are achieved in practice in any state, and can 

feasibly be implemented in the area; 

• Base year emission inventories and future year forecasts for manmade sources 

of PM2.5 and PM2.5 precursors;

• Plan provisions that require reasonable further progress (RFP) and quantitative 

milestones;

• Provisions for sufficient contingency measures for RFP and attainment; and

• Transportation conformity emission budgets to ensure transportation plans and 

projects are consistent with the SIP.

A. Demonstration SIP Commitments have been Met

The 2008 PM2.5 SIP contained an overarching enforceable commitment to reach the 

level of emissions specified in the attainment demonstration. The attainment emission 

targets specified in this commitment are achieved through the following elements of the 

ARB and District control strategy:

• Ongoing emission reductions that occur each year as the result of 

implementation of already adopted measures;

• A commitment to propose a specified list of new measures by specified 

deadlines; and

• A commitment to achieve an aggregate tonnage of emission reductions from new 

ARB and District measures necessary to reach the attainment targets.

These three elements are not independent of each other, but rather are the combination 

of integrated actions required to meet the attainment emission targets. Further, the

aggregate reductions can be achieved by new measures as described in the SIP, 

alternative measures identified by ARB and the District, and incentive program emission 

17
reductions from the replacement or retrofit of aging, higher polluting pieces of 

equipment.

Subsequent to the adoption of the 2008 PM2.5 SIP, both ARB and the District engaged 

in comprehensive rulemaking efforts to implement the SIP commitments. These 

rulemaking efforts are developed through a public process that involve public notices,

public comment opportunities, and with proposed and final rules published on agency 

web sites. Once regulations are submitted to U.S. EPA, they act on the measure 

through notice-and-comment rulemakings. 

By the time U.S. EPA approved the 2008 PM2.5 SIP in 2011, both ARB and the District 

had acted on the majority of measures included in the SIP, and U.S. EPA had approved 

many of these regulations and programs and credited the emission reductions toward 

meeting the aggregate commitment. Table 6 summarizes the ARB and District 

emission reduction commitments, as well as the reductions that U.S. EPA had already 

credited at the time of SIP approval. As can be seen in the table, the District had 

already exceeded the amount of NOx and SOx reductions needed, and ARB had 

achieved almost all of the needed PM2.5 reductions. U.S. EPA approval of these 

emission reductions is documented in the Federal Register notice and associated 

Technical Support Document (76 FR 41338; 76 FR 69896).

Table 6. 2011 U.S. EPA SIP Approval of ARB and District Commitments

NOx PM2.5 SOx

District Commitment 9.0 6.7 0.9

EPA Credited 11.1 4.2 3.6

ARB Commitment 17.1 2.3 0.0

EPA Credited 2.1 1.8 0.0

Subsequent to approval of the SIP in 2011, ARB and the District have continued to 

achieve further enforceable emission reductions that are creditable towards meeting the 

aggregate commitment. As a result, both ARB and the District have taken action on all 

of the control measures proposals contained in the 2008 PM2.5 SIP, and have achieved 

the aggregate emission reductions necessary to reach the attainment emission targets. 

Tables 7 and 8 document the actions taken for each of the ARB and District measures

along with the original expected action dates committed in the 2008 PM2.5 SIP . In 

addition to new ARB control measures, State actions also include measures from the 

Bureau of Automotive Repair (BAR) and the Department of Pesticide Regulation (DPR).

18
Table 7. 2008 PM2.5 SIP District Control Measures

Proposed New Control Measure Expected 

Action District Action

4103 – Open Burning 2010 April 2010

4320 – Advanced Emission 

Reductions for Boilers, Steam 

Generators and Process Heaters (> 

5 MMBtu/hr)

2008 October 2008

4307 – Boilers, Steam Generators 

and Process Heaters (2 to 5 

MMBtu/hr)

2008 October 2008 and May 2011

4308 – Boilers, Steam Generators 

and Process Heaters (0.075 to < 2 

MMBtu/hr)

2009 December 2009

4703 – Stationary Gas Turbines 2007 September 2007

4702 – Reciprocating Internal 

Combustion Engines 2010 August 2011

4354 – Glass Melting Furnaces

2008 October 2008 and May 2011 

4902 – Residential Water Heaters 2009 March 2009

4905 – Natural gas-Fired, Fan Type 

Residential Central Furnaces 2014 January 2015

4901 – Wood Burning Fireplaces 

and Wood Burning Heaters 2009 October 2008, and September 2014

4692 – Commercial Charbroiling 2009 September 2009

4311 –Flares 2009 June 2009

9410 – Employer Based Trip 

Reduction Program 2009 December 2009

Further Action

4352 – Solid Fired Boilers, Steam 

Generators and Process Heaters -- December 2011

19
Table 8. 2008 PM2.5 SIP State Control Measures

Proposed New Control Measure Expected 

Action Agency Action

Smog Check Improvements (BAR) 2007-2009 May 28, 2009 – adopted amendments

August 23, 2012 – adopted amendments

Expanded Vehicle Retirement 

(AB 118) (ARB/BAR) 2007 June 26, 2009 – adopted regulation

Modifications to Reformulated 

Gasoline Program (ARB) 2007 June 14, 2007 – adopted amendments

October 21, 2011 – adopted amendments

Cleaner In-Use Heavy-Duty Trucks

(ARB)

2007, 2008, 

2010

December 12, 2008 – adopted regulation

December 17, 2010 – adopted amendments

Auxiliary Ship Engine Cold Ironing & 

Other Clean Tech (EPA/ARB/BAR) 2007-2008 December 2007 – approved regulation

Cleaner Main Ship Engines and Fuel

(EPA/ARB/BAR)

Fuel: 2007 July 24, 2008 – adopted regulation

Engines: 

2009 March to July 2012 – provided funds

Port Truck Modernization

(ARB/Local) 2007-2008 December 17, 2010 – adopted amendments

Accelerated Intro. Of Cleaner 

Line-Haul Locomotives (EPA/ARB) 2008 September 25, 2008 – provided funds

Clean Up Existing Harbor Craft

(ARB) 2007 November 15, 2007 – approved regulation

June 24, 2010 – adopted amendments

Cleaner In-Use Off-Road Equipment

(ARB) 2007, 2010 July 26, 2007 – adopted regulation

December 17, 2010 – adopted amendments

Cleaner In-Use Agricultural 

Equipment (ARB) 2013 October 2013 – adopted regulation

New Emission Standards for 

Recreational Boats (ARB) 2013 February 19, 2015 – adopted regulation

Expanded Off-Road Recreational 

Vehicle Emissions Standards (ARB) 2013 July 25, 2013 – adopted regulation

Enhanced Vapor Recovery for 

Above-Ground Storage Tanks (ARB) 2008 May 2, 2008 – approved certification procedure

Additional Evaporative Emissions 

Standards (Portable Outboard 

Marine Tanks, Refueling Gasoline 

Tanks, Gas Station Refueling 

Hoses) (ARB)

2013 September 25, 2008 – adopted regulation

Consumer Products Program (ARB) 2008, 2009, 

2011

June 26, 2008 – adopted amendments

September 24, 2009 – adopted 

amendments

November 18, 2010 – adopted amendments

October 18, 2012 – adopted amendments

Pesticide Regulation (DPR) 2008, 2009 January 28, 2008 – submitted regulation to 

U.S. EPA

20
In addition to these actions, both the District (Table 9) and ARB (Table 10) have 

achieved further emission reductions through implementation of additional controls 

measures, as well as SIP-creditable incentive funded projects. Table 11 documents 

how the reductions from these additional enforceable emission reduction measures, 

coupled with the reductions U.S. EPA had already provided SIP credit for meet the 

aggregate emission reduction commitment in the 2008 PM2.5 SIP. 

Table 9. 2008 PM2.5 SIP Aggregate Commitment: District Measures

District Measures (Annual average tpd)

NOx PM2.5 SOx

Reductions Previously Credited by 

U.S. EPA 11.1 4.2 3.6

Additional Reductions:

4320 AERO Rule 1.8 0.0 0.0

9510 Indirect Source Review On-Site 

Compliance 1.0 0.1 0.0

Woodstove Replacements 0.0 0.1 0.0

District funded Incentive-Based Emission 

Reduction Measures 1.8 0.1 0.0

9410 Employer Based Trip Reduction 0.3 0.0 0.0

Actual Compliance with Rule 4901 0.0 1.3 0.0

Total from District Measures 16.0 5.8 3.6

Table 10. 2008 PM2.5 SIP Aggregate Commitment: ARB Measures

ARB Measures (Annual average tpd)

NOx PM2.5 SOx

Reductions Previously Credited by

U.S. EPA 2.1 1.8 0.0

Additional Reductions:

State funded Incentive-based Emission 

Reduction Measures 7.8 0.2 0.0

Actual Compliance with Truck and Bus 

Rule 11.5 0.1 0.0

2012 PERP and Portable Engine ATCM 2.6 0.2 0.0

Total from ARB Measures 24.0 2.3 0.0

21
Table 11. 2008 PM2.5 SIP Aggregate Commitment

Combined Measures (Annual average (tpd))

NOx PM2.5 SOx

District Reductions 16.0 5.9 3.6

ARB Reductions 24.0 2.3 0.0

Total ARB and District Reductions 40.0 8.1 3.6

Total Reductions Required 26.1 9.0 0.9

PM2.5 to NOx Emissions Equivalence (1:9) -8.1 0.9 0.0

Total Reductions Achieved 31.9 9.0 3.6

Commitment Met YES YES YES

The additional District emission reductions were achieved from measures that had not 

yet been approved at the time of U.S. EPA’s 2011 SIP approval, incentive-based 

reduction programs, and enhanced implementation of the District’s residential wood 

burning rule. Further ARB emission reductions were achieved from incentive-based 

reductions that were approved by the Board in October 2014, implementation of the 

ARB’s Portable Equipment Registration Program/Portable Engine ATCM, and 

assessment of actual fleet compliance with ARB’s Truck and Bus regulation. Further 

documentation of the emission reductions from these programs is included in

Appendix B.

As a result of these measures, the District exceeded their NOx commitment by 7.0 tpd, 

their SOx commitment by 2.7 tpd, and achieved all but 0.9 tpd of the required PM2.5

reductions (Table 9). Similarly, ARB reductions exceeded the NOx commitment by 

6.9 tpd and achieved all of the PM2.5 reductions (Table 10). 

Because PM2.5 is comprised of many different constituents, multiple combinations of 

emission levels of different precursors can all provide for attainment. In addition, 

relationships have been established that compare the benefits of achieving reductions 

in different PM2.5 precursors. Modeling conducted as part of the 2008 PM2.5 SIP 

demonstrated that a reduction of 9 tpd of NOx emissions provides equivalent air quality 

improvement as a 1 tpd reduction in directly emitted PM2.5 emissions. This emissions

benefit ratio was approved by U.S. EPA for demonstrating contingency reductions in the 

2008 PM2.5 SIP (79 FR 29327). As shown in Table 11, the 13.9 tpd of surplus NOx 

reductions achieved through implementation of the ARB and District measures, together

with the PM2.5 reductions achieved result in emission levels that in aggregate are 

sufficient for attainment based on the 2008 PM2.5 SIP modeling. The additional surplus 

SOx emission reductions provide further assurance that overall emission levels have 

been met.

22
B. Best Available Control Measures and Most Stringent Measures

The particulate matter provisions in the Act specify a step-wise process for the required 

level of emission control in a SIP, depending upon the severity of the air quality problem 

and amount of time a nonattainment area needs to meet the PM2.5 standard. For a 

serious nonattainment area, Best Available Control Measures (BACM) are the required 

level of control. BACM is required for those sources with emissions that are a 

significant contributor to the nonattainment problem. U.S. EPA defines BACM to be the

maximum degree of emission reductions achievable from a source or source category 

determined on a case-by-case basis considering energy, economic, and environmental 

impacts. Serious areas that cannot achieve the standard by the serious area attainment 

date are allowed to request a five-year extension if they have BACM in place and the 

SIP demonstrates it includes most stringent measures (MSM). The Act specifies that 

MSM is the maximum degree of emission reduction that has been required or achieved 

from a source or source category in other SIPs or in practice in other states and can 

feasibly be implemented in the area. 

The following sections summarize the BACM/MSM demonstrations conducted by ARB 

and the District. These analyses are further described in Chapter 5 and Appendix C 

and D of the 2015 PM2.5 SIP. 

1. ARB Assessment

ARB’s comprehensive mobile source control program relies on four fundamental 

approaches:

• stringent emissions standards that minimize emissions from new vehicles and 

equipment; 

• in-use programs that target the existing fleet and require the use of the cleanest 

vehicles and emissions control technologies;

• cleaner fuels that minimize emissions during combustion; and,

• incentive programs that remove older, dirtier vehicles and equipment and pay for 

early adoption of the cleanest available technologies. 

This multi-faceted approach has spurred the development of increasingly cleaner

technologies and fuels and achieved significant emission reductions across all mobile 

source sectors that go far beyond national programs or programs in other states. These 

efforts extend back to the first mobile source regulations adopted in the 1960s, and 

pre-date the Act of 1970, which established the basic national framework for controlling 

air pollution. In recognition of the pioneering nature of ARB’s efforts, the Act provides 

California unique authority to regulate mobile sources more stringently than the federal 

government by providing a waiver of preemption for its new vehicle emission standards 

under Section 209(b). This waiver provision preserves a pivotal role for California in the 

control of emissions from new motor vehicles, recognizing that California serves as a 

23
laboratory for setting motor vehicle emission standards. Since then, the ARB has 

consistently sought and obtained waivers and authorizations for its new motor vehicle 

regulations. ARB’s history of progressively strengthening standards as technology 

advances, coupled with the waiver process requirements, ensures that California’s 

regulations remain the most stringent in the nation. 

ARB’s BACM/MSM assessment for the mobile source categories under ARB’s 

regulatory authority included: 

• Documentation of California waivers and authorizations granted to California to 

enforce its own standards for new vehicles and engines;

• Description of the scope and stringency of California’s regulations and 

comparison to programs implemented at the federal level or in other states;

• Documentation of states that have been granted waivers to adopt California

rules; and,

• Discussion of incentive programs and other initiatives that go beyond regulatory 

requirements to provide an enhanced level of emission reductions.

This assessment demonstrates that ARB has continued to enhance and accelerate 

reductions from our mobile source control programs through the implementation of more 

stringent engine emissions standards, in-use requirements, incentive funding, and other 

policies and initiatives. These efforts not only ensure that all source sectors continue to 

achieve maximum emission reductions through implementation of the cleanest current 

technologies, but also promote the ongoing development of more advanced zero and 

near-zero technologies. As a result, California’s mobile source control programs reflect 

the most stringent and feasible level of emissions control in the nation and fully meet the 

requirements for BACM and MSM. 

2. District Assessment

Through multiple planning processes to meet federal ozone and PM2.5 standards, the 

District has adopted a comprehensive suite of control measures. These rules address a 

wide range of sources, from residential wood burning and sources of fugitive dust, to 

industrial facilities and stationary engines. The District followed a multi-step process 

outlined in U.S. EPA’s guidance to identify BACM and MSM for each of these sources 

and determine whether District programs met these requirements. Although ammonia 

is not considered a significant PM2.5 plan precursor, the District also included an 

assessment of rules addressing confined animal facilities, organic material composting,

and biosolids, animal manure, and poultry litter operations. The District’s review of its 

rules followed the five steps below: 

1. Developed a detailed inventory (provided in the 2015 PM2.5 SIP Appendix B).

2. Based on the attainment demonstration information in the Plan and the 2012 

baseline inventory determined which sources are significant. 

24
3. From a list of 40 source categories, the District identified six source categories 

that have emissions over the significance (de minimis) level for PM2.5, NOx or 

SOx. These include open burning, glass melting furnaces, conservation 

management practices, commercial charbroiling, wood burning fireplaces and 

woodburning heaters, and paved and unpaved roads. 

4. Identified potential BACM and MSM from significant sources in other 

implementation plans or used in practice for each significant source category 

evaluating technological and economic feasibility. Further, the District also 

conducted control measure evaluations for the remaining de minimis source 

categories.

5. Compared potential BACM and MSM for each source category to the 

corresponding adopted District rule. District rules and source categories were 

compared to federal and state regulations and standards and other air district 

rules and standards. 

Based on the results of this analysis, the District determined that District rules meet the 

requirements for BACM and MSM in consideration of the feasibility and cost 

effectiveness criteria defined in the Act. Nevertheless, as part of the 2015 PM2.5 SIP

control strategy, the District has committed to strengthen the commercial charbroiling 

Rule 4692. The District has also committed to evaluate the potential for further 

emission reductions from rules addressing agricultural conservation management 

practices, flares, and hot mix asphalt.

C. Emissions Inventory

SIPs must contain base-year inventories for PM2.5 and all precursor emissions as well 

as future year forecasts for all pollutants identified as PM2.5 attainment plan precursors. 

An emission inventory consists of a systematic listing of the sources of air pollutants 

with an estimate of the amount of pollutants from each source or source category over a 

given period of time. 

ARB and District staff worked jointly to prepare an updated emission inventory (annual 

average and winter) for the 2015 PM2.5 SIP. The inventory includes a category-bycategory review and update using the most recent information available on emissionsgenerating activities and anticipated population and economic growth in the region. 

Additional information on the emission inventory methodologies and resulting base and 

future year emissions can be found in Appendix B of the 2015 PM2.5 SIP.

D. Reasonable Further Progress and Quantitative Milestones

The Act requires SIPs to provide steady air quality progress by reducing emissions 

during the years leading to attainment. This is known as Reasonable Further Progress 

(RFP). As part of this requirement, a SIP must include quantitative milestones to be 

achieved every three years until the area is redesignated to attainment and which 

25
demonstrates RFP. The 2015 PM2.5 SIP identifies RFP emission levels for NOx, SOx, 

and PM2.5 for 2014 and 2017 that show generally linear progress in emission 

reductions towards attainment of the annual standard in 2020. These emission levels 

for 2017 along with the 2020 attainment emission levels serve as the quantitative 

milestones required under the Act. 

Targeting the most effective precursors is essential to ensuring air quality progress. 

Ammonium nitrate comprises a large fraction of PM2.5 concentrations and therefore 

reducing ammonium nitrate concentrations is a necessary element of the control 

strategy. As discussed earlier, while both NOx and ammonia participate in the 

formation of ammonium nitrate, NOx reductions are at least an order of magnitude more 

effective than ammonia reductions, and therefore the 2015 PM2.5 SIP control strategy 

focuses on NOx reductions. As shown in Table 12, NOx emission levels are projected 

to be well below the level required for linear progress in 2014 and 2017, including 

reductions required for contingency. Although ammonia is not considered a significant 

precursor and therefore RFP is not required, ammonia emissions are also provided in 

the table. While ammonia emissions are increasing slightly over the progress period,

given the atmospheric response to NOx and ammonia emissions, the combined 

emission levels of NOx and ammonia that are projected to occur through the 2020 

attainment year provide for the required generally linear air quality progress. The NOx 

Equivalent emission levels are projected to be below the level required for linear 

progress in 2014 and 2017.

Table 12. NOx and Ammonia Emissions Levels Between 2012 and 2017 and NOx 

Equivalence (tpd).

2012 2014 2017

NOx Emissions 332.2 284.2 235.7

Ammonia Emissions 329.5 336.2 347.0

NOx Equivalent Emissions 284.9 237.5

NOx RFP Linear Level 300.9 253.9

Additional documentation for NOx, PM2.5 and SOx RFP is provided in Chapter 6 of the 

2015 PM2.5 SIP. For the future 2017 and 2020 quantitative milestones, ARB further 

commits to provide U.S. EPA with a letter reporting that the emission inventory

milestones have been met and the status of any emission reduction commitments. The 

letter for the respective 2017 and 2020 milestones will be provided by March 31, 2018 

and March 31, 2021, as specified in the Act.

E. Contingency Measures

Contingency measures provide additional emission reductions in the event a 

nonattainment area fails to achieve RFP targets or attain the PM2.5 standard by its 

attainment date. These contingency measures are to take effect without further ARB or 

District action and consist of reductions that are not required as part of demonstrating 

attainment. Early reductions from the control strategy beyond those needed for RFP 

provide for 2017 contingency. In addition, reductions that accrue between 2020 and 

26
2021 from implementation of new rule requirements provide the majority of the 

attainment contingency reductions. Additional reductions achieved through incentive

programs complement the attainment contingency reductions. The breakdown of the 

2020 attainment year contingency reductions is provided in Table 13. For the interim 

24-hour 2018 attainment deadline, additional reductions in 2019 provide for 0.2 tpd of 

PM2.5 and 10 tpd of NOx reductions. Further discussion of contingency measures is 

provided in Chapter 6 of the 2015 PM2.5 SIP. 

Table 13. 2021 Annual Attainment Year Contingency Reductions

PM2.5 (tpd) NOx (tpd)

ARB Mobile Source Reductions 0.3 11.9

PERP Regulation/ATCM 0.1 1.7

ISR On-Site Mitigation 0.0 1.0

AERO Rule 0.0 1.8

Total 0.4 16.4

Contingency Reductions Required 0.4 15.7

Contingency Met YES YES

F. Transportation Conformity Budgets

Under section 176(c) of the Act, transportation activities that receive federal funding or 

approval must be fully consistent with the SIP. U.S. EPA’s transportation conformity 

rule3 details requirements for establishing motor vehicle emission budgets (budgets) in 

SIPs for the purpose of ensuring the conformity of transportation plans and programs 

with the SIP. 

The 2015 PM2.5 SIP establishes county-level on-road motor vehicle emission budgets 

for each RFP milestone year, as well as for the attainment year. Emission budgets for 

direct PM2.5 and NOx were calculated using EMFAC2014 and reflect annual average 

emissions. The emission budgets established in the 2015 PM2.5 SIP fulfill the 

requirements of the Act and U.S. EPA regulations to ensure that transportation projects 

will not interfere with progress and attainment of the annual PM2.5 standard. Additional 

detail on the on-road motor vehicle emission budgets can be found in Chapter 6 of the 

2015 PM2.5 SIP.

3 U.S. EPA maintains online information on its transportation conformity program, including access to 

relevant rulemakings, policy guidance, and reports at: http://www.epa.gov/otaq/transp/traqconf.htm

27

 
V. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT

A. Introduction 

ARB has determined that the 2015 PM2.5 SIP is exempt from the requirements of 

CEQA. A brief explanation of this determination is provided in section B below. ARB’s 

regulatory program, which involves the adoption, approval, amendment, or repeal of 

standards, rules, regulations, or plans for the protection and enhancement of the State’s 

ambient air quality, has been certified by the California Secretary for Natural Resources 

under Public Resources Code section 21080.5 of the California Environmental Quality 

Act (CEQA) (14 CCR 15251(d)). Public agencies with certified regulatory programs are 

exempt from certain CEQA requirements, including but not limited to, preparing 

environmental impact reports, negative declarations, and initial studies. ARB, as a lead 

agency, prepares a substitute environmental document (referred to as an 

“Environmental Analysis” or “EA”) as part of the Staff Report prepared for a proposed 

action to comply with CEQA (17 CCR 60000-60008). If the Board approves the 2015 

PM2.5 SIP, a Notice of Exemption will be filed with the Office of the Secretary for the 

Natural Resources Agency and the State Clearinghouse for public inspection.

B. Analysis

ARB has determined that the 2015 PM2.5 SIP is exempt from CEQA under the general 

rule or “common sense” exemption (14 CCR 15061(b)(3)). CEQA Guidelines states “the 

activity is covered by the general rule that CEQA applies only to projects which have the 

potential for causing a significant effect on the environment. Where it can be seen with 

certainty that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant 

effect on the environment, the activity is not subject to CEQA”. The proposal is also 

categorically exempt from CEQA under the “Class 8” exemption (14 CCR 15308) 

because it is an action taken by a regulatory agency for the protection of the 

environment. The 2015 PM2.5 SIP efforts include a District commitment to provide 

targeted incentive funding for the purchase of cleaner heavy-duty trucks and woodstove 

replacements, and proposed ARB actions for heavy-duty trucks that focus on cleaner 

combustion technologies, as well as introduction of zero and near-zero emission 

equipment. In addition, the District has committed to evaluate the potential for further 

emission reductions from rules that address agricultural conservation management 

practices, flares, and hot mix asphalt. The intent of these efforts is to decrease the 

PM2.5 emissions within the San Joaquin Valley in order to meet the attainment goal set 

by the U.S. EPA. Based on ARB’s review it can be seen with certainty that there is no 

possibility that the 2015 PM2.5 SIP may result in a significant adverse impact on the 

environment. Further, the action is designed to protect the environment and ARB found 

no substantial evidence indicating the proposal could adversely affect air quality or any 

other environmental resource area, or that any of the exceptions to the exemption applies 

(14 CCR 15300.2). Therefore, this activity is exempt from CEQA.

28
VI. SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATION

Meeting federal PM2.5 standards in the Valley is a continuing challenge that has been 

further exacerbated by the weather conditions associated with the ongoing drought. 

The 2015 PM2.5 SIP lays out a course for expeditious attainment of the 1997 standards 

by 2018 and 2020, and serves as a foundation for development of the 2016 SIP to meet 

the more stringent 24-hour and annual PM2.5 standards adopted in 2006 and 2012. 

ARB staff has determined that the 2015 PM2.5 SIP meets the requirement of the Act

and therefore recommends that the Board approve the SJV 2015 PM2.5 SIP as a 

revision to the California SIP. 

However, the need for continuing action is essential. In order to continue to pursue 

further near-term emission reductions, the District has committed to provide targeted 

incentive funding for heavy-duty trucks and wood stove replacements, as well as 

committed to evaluate the potential for additional emission reductions from a number of 

sources currently regulated under District rules. ARB has also identified a number of 

actions related to achieving a cleaner heavy-duty truck fleet as part of the sustainable 

freight strategy, along with continued incentive funding. 

As the drought continues, ARB and District staff will continue to closely monitor PM2.5 

air quality conditions and potential impacts on attainment of the standards. Finally, 

because atmospheric chemistry can change over time, and as new scientific information 

becomes available, ARB will also continue to evaluate the role of ammonia as part of 

the 2016 SIP.

29
APPENDIX A 

SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY 

PM2.5 WEIGHT OF EVIDENCE ANALYSIS
TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY................................................................................................. 1

1. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 7

2. PM2.5 STANDARDS AND HEALTH EFFECTS ....................................................... 8

3. MONITORING IN THE SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY...................................................... 9

a. Established monitoring network ......................................................................... 9

b. Extensive field studies...................................................................................... 10

4. NATURE AND EXTENT OF THE PM2.5 PROBLEM ............................................. 12

a. Current air quality............................................................................................. 12

b. Seasonal variability .......................................................................................... 14

c. Chemical composition ......................................................................................... 15

5. SECONDARY AMMONIUM NITRATE FORMATION............................................. 17

a. Chemistry......................................................................................................... 17

b. Limiting precursor concept ............................................................................... 18

c. Role of ammonia in ammonium nitrate formation................................................ 19

d. Role of VOC in ammonium nitrate formation.................................................... 30

6. SECONDARY ORGANIC AEROSOL FORMATION............................................... 39

7. SECONDARY AMMONIUM SULFATE FORMATION ............................................ 41

8. EMISSION SOURCES OF ANNUAL AVERAGE PM2.5 ........................................ 42

a. Emission inventory ........................................................................................... 42

b. Source apportionment using source receptor models ...................................... 44

9. PM2.5 AIR QUALITY PROGRESS......................................................................... 47

a. Annual PM2.5 trends........................................................................................ 47

b. 24-Hour PM2.5 trends...................................................................................... 48

c. Trends in 24-hour, seasonal, and hourly PM2.5.................................................. 50

d. Chemical composition trends ........................................................................... 56

e. Trends in chemical markers of source types.................................................... 58

f. Emission inventory trends ................................................................................... 59

A-i
10. LINKING AIR QUALITY TRENDS TO EMISSION REDUCTIONS ......................... 60

a. NOx control ...................................................................................................... 60

b. Residential wood combustion controls ............................................................. 62

11. MODELED ATTAINMENT DEMONSTRATION...................................................... 65

12. SUMMARY ............................................................................................................. 69

REFERENCES.............................................................................................................. 71

APPENDIX A1 - CRPAQS References

APPENDIX A2 - 2011 Madera Air Quality Data

APPENDIX A3 - CMB Analysis 

APPENDIX A4 - PMF Analysis

A-ii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

As part of the attainment demonstration, the SJV 2015 PM2.5 Plan specifically identifies 

the: 1) most expeditious date of when the Valley will attain the standards, 2) relative 

efficacy of precursor emission reductions, 3) amount of emissions needed to attain, and 

4) control strategy. The weight of evidence analysis provides a set of complementary 

analyses that supplement the required model based attainment demonstration. 

Because all methods have strengths and weaknesses, examining an air quality problem 

in a variety of ways offsets the limitations and uncertainty that are inherent in air quality 

modeling. This approach also provides a better understanding of the overall problem 

and the level and mix of emissions controls needed for attainment. 

Analyses conducted by ARB and District staff, along with findings from the California 

Regional Particulate Air Quality Study (CRPAQS) provide the supplemental information 

supporting the attainment demonstration. CRPAQS was a public/private partnership 

designed to advance our understanding of the nature of PM2.5 in the Valley and guide 

development of effective control strategies. The study included monitoring at over 100 

sites as well as data analysis and modeling, results of which have been published in 

over 60 papers and presented at national and international conferences. 

Studies such as CRPAQS provide valuable information that supports the SIP process in 

a number of ways. First, these studies provide additional observational data that help to 

provide a more detailed understanding of the nature of the PM2.5 problem in the San 

Joaquin Valley. This data also is used to update the fundamental algorithms contained 

within air quality models, thereby enhancing their ability to simulate observed air quality 

conditions. Finally, they provide an improved basis for model applications used in the 

preparation of SIPs and a more robust platform for evaluating the response to emission 

controls and predicting future air quality.

In 2006, U.S. EPA tightened the 24-hour PM2.5 standard to 35 μg/m3 and in 2012, the 

annual standard to 12 μg/m3

. The District adopted the 2012 PM2.5 Plan addressing the 

35 μg/m3 24-hour standard and U.S. EPA proposed approval of the Moderate area 

requirements in this Plan in 2015. The SIP for the 12 μg/m3 annual standard will be due 

to U.S. EPA in 2016. 

What are the key sources of the PM2.5 problem in the Valley?

The geography of the San Joaquin Valley, along with weather patterns influence the 

accumulation, formation, and dispersion of PM2.5. As a result, PM2.5 concentrations 

are generally higher in the central and southern portions of the Valley, with highest 

values in the urban areas of and around Fresno and Bakersfield. Concentrations are 

highest during the winter months of November through February. During the winter of 

2013/2014, a persistent high-pressure weather system over Northern California caused

the atmosphere to become stagnant, which in conjunction with nearly two months 

without rain, resulted in episodes of high PM2.5 concentrations lasting for several 

A-1
weeks. These elevated wintertime PM2.5 concentrations also resulted in higher annual 

average concentrations.

Ammonium nitrate and carbon compounds (organic and elemental carbon) are the 

largest chemical constituents, comprising, on an annual average basis, 70 to 80 percent 

of the PM2.5 mass and about 90 percent of winter peak day PM2.5 mass. Geological 

material (dust) and ammonium sulfate are smaller contributors. 

Source apportionment studies confirm the importance of ammonium nitrate 

contributions to PM2.5 and also identify motor vehicle exhaust and biomass burning as 

significant contributors. Sources of biomass burning include residential wood 

combustion, agricultural and prescribed burning, and cooking.

Ammonium nitrate is formed in the atmosphere from reactions of gaseous precursors. 

Emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOx) from mobile sources and stationary combustion 

sources react with ammonia which is primarily emitted from livestock operations and 

fertilizer application. Heavy duty diesel vehicles account for approximately 50 percent 

of annual average NOx emissions, followed by farm and off-road equipment, other 

vehicles, trains, and stationary combustion sources. The stagnant, cold, and damp 

conditions that occur during the winter promote the formation and accumulation of 

ammonium nitrate. Elevated concentrations can be found at both urban and rural sites. 

In contrast, organic carbon is highest in urban areas due to emissions from residential 

wood combustion, commercial cooking operations, and mobile source tailpipe 

emissions which are largest in urban areas. Due to the localized urban increment from 

these activities, which adds to the more regional ammonium nitrate concentrations, the 

highest PM2.5 concentrations in the Valley usually occur at urban sites in the winter. 

What is the effectiveness of controlling different PM2.5 precursors? 

In addition to directly emitted PM2.5 there are multiple precursor pollutants that lead to 

PM2.5 formation (NOx, sulfur oxides (SOx), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and 

ammonia). 

Given the large contribution of ammonium nitrate to high PM2.5 concentrations, a 

number of different studies and analyses were evaluated to understand the role of 

VOCs and ammonia in ammonium nitrate formation in the San Joaquin Valley. The 

amount of ammonium nitrate produced depends upon the relative atmospheric 

abundance of its precursors. It is therefore important to understand which precursor 

controls are most effective in reducing ammonium nitrate concentrations. In simple 

terms, the precursor in shortest supply will limit how much ammonium nitrate is 

produced. This is known as the limiting precursor and controls of this precursor will 

have the most significant benefits in reducing PM2.5 concentrations. 

The precursor assessment for the 2015 PM2.5 plan included evaluation of emissions 

inventories, monitoring studies, and photochemical modeling analyses of ammonium 

A-2
nitrate sensitivity to precursor emission reductions. While emissions inventory and 

monitoring data can indicate the relative abundance of the different precursors, 

photochemical models provide a quantitative approach to simulate the effects that 

emission reductions in each of gaseous precursors would have on the predicted 

ammonium nitrate concentrations.

Evaluation of emissions inventory data concluded that the ammonia-rich conditions 

throughout the Valley demonstrate that NOx rather than ammonia is the limiting 

precursor during wintertime PM2.5 episodes as well as on an annual average basis. 

Data of monitoring conducted during wintertime PM2.5 episodes, further corroborate 

this finding. In addition, photochemical modeling studies found that while large 

reductions in NOx led to commensurate reductions in ammonium nitrate, comparable 

reductions in ammonia were much less effective. Precursor sensitivity modeling 

conducted for the 2012 PM2.5 Plan showed that on a per ton basis, reductions in NOx 

are approximately nine times more effective than reductions in ammonia. Finally, 

evaluation of ambient air quality trends show that reductions in NOx emissions, gaseous 

NOx concentrations, and particulate nitrate all track each other well.

Evaluation of monitoring studies also provided some evidence that VOCs could be 

important at times, however, these studies were not conclusive. Therefore 

photochemical modeling studies are more appropriate to assess the overall impact of 

VOC controls. These modeling studies found that at current NOx levels, further VOC 

emission reductions produce essentially no benefit, and in some instances may actually 

lead to an increase in ammonium nitrate concentrations. Findings from these prior

studies were supported by precursor sensitivity modeling conducted for the 2012 PM2.5 

SIP, which indicated a very small disbenefit from reductions in VOCs. 

Based on the weight of evidence presented from historical studies, coupled with the 

modeled precursor sensitivity analyses conducted as part of the 2012 PM2.5 Plan, 

ammonia controls provide only a very small benefit in reducing PM2.5 levels, and VOC 

controls can result in a disbenefit. However, directly emitted PM2.5, NOx and SOx 

controls have been documented to result in PM2.5 air quality improvement and are 

therefore the focus of the control strategy in the San Joaquin Valley.

What progress has the prior control approach achieved in reducing PM2.5 

concentrations?

The implemented control strategy reducing directly emitted PM2.5, NOx, and SOx 

emissions has resulted in measurable PM2.5 air quality improvements. Over the last 

dozen years, the Valley has experienced progress in reducing both annual average and 

24-hour PM2.5 concentrations. Between 2001 and 2013, annual average design values 

declined between 30 and 35 percent at individual monitoring locations. During this 

same time period, 24-hour PM2.5 design values in the Valley have also decreased 

between approximately 30 and 45 percent. In addition, the number of days exceeding 

the 24-hour standard decreased by about 60 to 80 percent. 

A-3
Even though the drought related meteorological conditions caused significant increases 

in 2013 PM2.5 concentrations, all sites in the Valley still attained the 24-hour standard 

of 65 μg/m3 and almost half of the sites attained the annual standard of 15 μg/m3

. 

Additional evaluations provide further insight into the annual and 24-hour PM2.5 

progress that has been observed. For example, as the fraction of days recording PM2.5 

levels above the 24-hour standard of 65 μg/m3 has decreased, there has been a 

corresponding increase in the fraction of days below the level of the annual standard of 

15 μg/m3

. Average concentrations during the winter months have decreased, and under 

similar meteorological conditions, peak 24-hour concentrations during the 2013/2014 

episodes are 30 to 40 percent lower than they were during the 2000/2001 CRPAQS 

episode due to the impact of implemented emission controls. 

Programs aimed at reducing NOx emissions have played an important role in reducing 

PM2.5 ammonium nitrate concentrations. Between 2004 and 2012, Valley-wide NOx 

emissions decreased by 41 percent, with a commensurate reduction of about 

37 percent in measured PM2.5 nitrate at the Bakersfield and Fresno monitoring sites. 

Based on the SJV 2015 PM2.5 Plan attainment demonstration, the 38 percent in NOx 

emission reductions expected from the control strategy between 2012 and 2020, are 

projected to decrease PM2.5 nitrate by 17 percent at the Bakersfield site and 25 percent 

at the Fresno site.

Control measures reducing directly emitted PM2.5 have also led to measurable 

reductions in PM2.5 concentrations. Between 2004 and 2012, Valley-wide PM2.5 

emissions from combustion sources decreased by 30 percent, with a concomitant 

reduction of 15 percent in measured carbonaceous PM2.5 at the Bakersfield site and 

20 percent at Fresno site. Based on the SJV 2015 PM2.5 Plan attainment 

demonstration, the 28 percent reduction in PM2.5 carbon emission expected from the 

control strategy implementation between 2012 and 2020 is projected to decrease 

carbonaceous PM2.5 by 22 percent at the Bakersfield and Fresno monitoring sites.

When will the Valley attain the PM2.5 standard with the proposed control 

strategy?

The U.S. EPA approved air quality modeling for the 2008 PM2.5 SIP provided the basis 

to predict future PM2.5 concentrations at each monitoring site in the San Joaquin 

Valley. The attainment demonstration uses the fundamental chemistry and associated 

response of different PM2.5 constituents to emission controls reflected in the modeling 

in the 2008 PM2.5 SIP. This modeling science is coupled with 2013 design values and 

PM2.5 chemical composition reflecting drought impacts, along with emission reductions 

expected in 2020 (for the annual standard demonstration) and in 2018 (for the 24-hour 

demonstration). 

To assess the representativeness of the 2008 SIP modeling for capturing the dynamics 

and response to emission reductions for the updated attainment demonstration, ARB 

staff evaluated both the meteorological characteristics, as well as the chemical 

A-4
composition used in the two modeling efforts. The types of meteorological conditions 

conducive to PM2.5 formation in 2013/2014 were similar to the 2000/2001 

meteorological conditions simulated in the 2008 SIP. These factors include the 

presence of persistent ridges that result in warm air aloft and strong stability with limited 

mixing, cool morning temperatures, and low wind speeds. Although the persistence of 

these meteorological conditions in 2013/2014 resulted in an increased number of days 

with high concentrations, the underlying meteorological factors driving elevated PM2.5

concentrations were similar to 2000/2001. In addition, the PM2.5 chemical composition 

used in the 2008 PM2.5 modeling was very similar to 2013, indicating common 

atmospheric chemistry regimes. Therefore, the 2008 PM2.5 SIP modeling response to 

emission reduction, applied to 2013 design values, provides a suitable basis for the 

updated attainment demonstration.

The magnitude of emission reductions required for attainment is consistent with past 

response of Valley PM2.5 to NOx and directly emitted PM2.5 reductions. The 

implementation of new reductions from California’s on-going emission control programs 

will provide the majority of the emission reductions needed to attain the annual PM2.5

standard throughout the San Joaquin Valley in 2020. Between 2012 and 2020, 

implementation of these control programs will reduce NOx emissions by 38 percent.

The NOx reductions result from ongoing implementation of both new vehicle standards 

for passenger and heavy-duty diesel vehicles and equipment, as well as rules 

accelerating the turnover of legacy diesel fleets. Implementation of stringent 

requirements for new off-road engines and in-use off road equipment lead to further 

NOx reductions, along with District rules addressing stationary source NOx emissions.

In addition, directly emitted PM2.5 emissions in aggregate will be decreasing by 

eight percent as a result of ongoing implementation of diesel on- and off-road 

equipment measures as well as the District control measures curtailing agricultural and 

residential wood burning, along with additional reductions from enhancements to the 

District’s commercial charbroiling rule slated for adoption in 2016. 

All of these measures provide the necessary control strategy to ensure the entire Valley 

is in attainment of the 65 ug/m3 24-hour PM2.5 standard by 2018 and the 15 ug/m3

annual PM2.5 standard by 2020.

What is the impact of 2014 PM2.5 air quality data?

The drought-related meteorological conditions that affected PM2.5 concentrations in the 

San Joaquin Valley during 2013 continued into 2014. Although complete data for 2014 

is not yet available, this section provides a preliminary assessment of 2014 air quality 

data in relation to the attainment demonstration. 

Despite the ongoing persistence of the drought, air quality conditions in 2014 generally 

improved at most locations, particularly in the northern and central portions of the 

Valley. This is an indication that although drought conditions are continuing, progress is 

resuming as a result of ongoing emission reductions. However, because 2014 design 

A-5
values will reflect the impact of multiple years of drought, a comparison to the 2013 

design values used in the attainment demonstration is expected to be mixed, with some 

locations recording design values that are slightly lower, and other locations recording 

design values that are slightly higher. Based on an assessment of the PM2.5 levels 

predicted for 2020 as well as ongoing trends and analyses, consideration of 2014 

design values is expected to remain consistent with the current attainment 

demonstration. However, ARB and the District will continue to monitor the impacts of 

the drought and its relationship to future PM2.5 attainment needs.

A-6
1. INTRODUCTION 

To address the 1997 annual PM2.5 standard of 15 μg/m3 and 24-hour standard of 

65 μg/m3, the District adopted the 2008 PM2.5 Plan. The Plan demonstrated attainment

by April 2015. U.S. EPA approved this Plan in 2011 (76 FR 41338; 76 FR 69896). 

The 2015 PM2.5 Plan specifically identifies the: 1) most expeditious date of when the

Valley will attain the standard, 2) relative efficacy of precursor emission reductions, 

3) amount of emissions needed to attain, and 4) attainment strategy. The Weight of 

Evidence (WOE) analysis provides a set of complementary analyses that supplement 

the required modeled attainment demonstration.

A WOE approach looks at the entirety of the information at hand to provide a more 

informed basis for the attainment strategy. Because all methods have strengths and 

weaknesses, examining an air quality problem in a variety of ways offsets the limitations 

and uncertainty that are inherent in air quality modeling. This approach also provides a 

better understanding of the overall problem and the level and mix of emissions controls 

needed for attainment.

The U.S. EPA recognizes the importance of a comprehensive assessment of air quality 

data and modeling and encourages this type of broad assessment for all attainment 

demonstrations. In their modeling guidance, they further note that the results of 

supplementary analyses may be used in a WOE determination to show that attainment 

is likely despite modeled results which may be inconclusive. Following U.S. EPA 

guidance, future year modeled annual average design values that fall between

14.5 and 15.5 ug/m3 need to be accompanied by a WOE demonstration to determine 

whether attainment will occur. This range in model based design values reflects the 

uncertainty in predicting absolute PM2.5 concentrations that is inherent in air quality 

modeling, and therefore recognizes that an improved assessment of attainment can be 

derived from examining a broader set of analyses. 

U.S. EPA recommends that three basic types of analyses be included to supplement 

the primary modeling analysis in the WOE approach: 1) analyses of trends in ambient 

air quality and emissions, 2) observational models and diagnostic analyses, and 

3) additional modeling evaluations. The scope of the WOE analysis is different for each 

nonattainment area. The level of detail appropriate for each area depends upon the 

complexity of the air quality problem, how far into the future the attainment deadline is, 

and the amount of data and modeling available. For example, less analysis is needed 

for an area that is projecting attainment near-term and by a wide margin, and for which 

recent air quality trends have demonstrated significant progress, than for areas with 

more severe air quality challenges

The following sections present the WOE assessment that supports the attainment 

demonstration for the 1997 annual and 24-hour PM2.5 standards in the San Joaquin 

Valley.

A-7
2. PM2.5 STANDARDS AND HEALTH EFFECTS

PM2.5 is a complex mixture of particles and liquid droplets that vary in size and 

chemical composition. As a subset of PM10, particles with diameters up to 

10 micrometers, PM2.5 comprises particles with diameters up to 2.5 micrometers.

PM2.5 contains a diverse set of substances including elements such as carbon and 

metals, compounds such as nitrates, sulfates, and organic materials, and complex 

mixtures such as diesel exhaust and soil or dust. Some of the particles are directly 

emitted into the atmosphere. Other particles, referred to as secondary particles, result 

when gases are transformed into particles through physical and chemical processes in 

the atmosphere.

Numerous health effects studies have linked exposure to PM2.5 to increased severity of 

asthma attacks, development of chronic bronchitis, decreased lung function in children, 

increased respiratory and cardiovascular hospitalizations, and even premature death in 

people with existing cardiac or respiratory disease. In addition, California has identified 

particulate exhaust from diesel engines as a toxic air contaminant – suspected to cause 

cancer, other serious illnesses, and premature death. Those most sensitive to PM2.5 

pollution include people with existing respiratory and cardiac problems, children, and 

older adults.

Ambient air quality standards establish the levels above which PM2.5 may cause 

adverse health effects. In 1997, U.S. EPA adopted the first set of PM2.5 air quality 

standards, an annual standard of 15 μg/m3 and a 24-hour standard of 65 μg/m3

. In 

2006, they tightened the 24-hour standard to 35 μg/m3, and in 2012, they tightened the 

annual standard to 12 μg/m3

. 

The District adopted the 2008 PM2.5 Plan to address the 1997 PM2.5 standards. 

U.S. EPA approved the 2008 PM2.5 Plan in 2011 (76 FR 41338; 76 FR 69896). As 

previously mentioned, meteorological conditions associated with the current drought 

resulted in elevated PM2.5 levels in the Valley during the winter of 2013/2014 that 

affected annual and 24-hour PM2.5 concentrations. As a result, the SJV will not meet 

the attainment deadline in the 2008 PM2.5 Plan. In March 2015, U.S. EPA reclassified 

the SJV as a serious nonattainment area with a December 31, 2015 attainment 

deadline (80 FR 1482) and required a new SIP to address the 1997 PM2.5 standards. 

The District also adopted the 2012 PM2.5 Plan addressing the 35 μg/m3 24-hour 

standard. U.S. EPA recently proposed approval of this SIP as meeting moderate area 

requirements. The SIP for the 12 μg/m3 annual PM2.5 standard is due to U.S. EPA in 

2016. 

A-8
3. MONITORING IN THE SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY

a. Established monitoring network

An extensive network of PM2.5 monitors throughout the SJV provides data to assess 

compliance with ambient air quality standards and to study the nature of ambient 

PM2.5. Many sites include multiple monitoring instruments running in parallel. 

Currently ten sites operate Federal Reference Monitors (FRMs), which provide 

regulatory data that are used to assess compliance with the federal PM2.5 standards. 

Additional monitors provide hourly PM2.5 measurements, a subset of which (ten) are 

Federal Equivalent Monitors (FEM), which can also be used to assess compliance with 

the standards. The FRM and FEM monitoring sites are shown in Figure 1. The 

locations of these monitors are designed to capture population exposure. In addition, 

data collected at these monitors serve to report air quality conditions to the public, and 

support forecasting for the District’s agricultural and residential burning curtailment 

programs. Finally, four sites have chemical speciation monitors. The speciation 

monitors collect samples that are further analyzed in the laboratory to determine the 

chemical make-up of PM2.5. 

Figure 1. San Joaquin Valley PM2.5 monitoring network (FRMs and FEMs).

A-9
b. Extensive field studies

The San Joaquin Valley is one of the most studied areas in the world with an extensive 

number of publications in peer-reviewed international scientific/technical journals and 

other major reports. Since 1970, close to 20 major field studies have been conducted in 

the Valley and surrounding areas that have elucidated various aspects of the nature and 

causes of ozone and particulate matter. A comprehensive listing of publications 

(reports and peer-reviewed journal articles) is provided in Appendix A1.

The first major study specifically focused on particulate matter was the Integrated 

Monitoring Study in 1995 (IMS-95), which was the pilot study for the subsequent 

California Regional Particulate Air Quality Study (CRPAQS) in 2000 (Solomon and 

Magliano, 1998). IMS-95 formed the technical basis for the SJV 2003 PM10 Plan that

was approved by the U.S. EPA in 2004 (71 FR 63642), and the Valley was 

subsequently re-designated as attainment in 2008 (73 FR 66759). CRPAQS was a key 

component of the technical foundation for the SJV 2008 PM2.5 Plan that U.S. EPA 

approved in 2011 (76 FR 41338; 76 FR 69896). CRPAQS findings remain relevant to 

the development of the current PM2.5 Plan. 

CRPAQS was a public/private partnership designed to advance the understanding of 

the nature of PM2.5 in the Valley and guide development of effective control strategies. 

The study included monitoring at over 100 sites (Figure 2) as well as data analysis and 

modeling, results of which have been published in over 60 papers and presented at 

national and international conferences. The field campaign was carried out between 

December 1999 and February 2001. CRPAQS improved our understanding of the 

spatial and temporal distribution of PM2.5 in the Valley, its chemical composition, 

transport and transformation processes, and contributing sources. More details on 

CRPAQS can be found at the following link: http://www.arb.ca.gov/airways/ccaqs.htm.

Figure 2. CRPAQS monitoring program.

A-10
Findings from CRPAQS and other studies have been integrated into the conceptual 

model of PM2.5 in the San Joaquin Valley. The conceptual model provides the 

scientific foundation for the WOE analysis supporting the annual and 24-hour PM2.5 

standards attainment demonstration. Specific findings are integrated into the various 

WOE analysis sections of this document. 

Further field studies relevant to PM2.5 include the California portion of the Arctic 

Research of the Composition of the Troposphere (ARCTAS-CARB) which took place in

2008 (Jacob, et al., 2010), and Research at the Nexus of Air Quality and Climate 

(CalNex2010) conducted in 2010 (www.esrl.noaa.gov/csd/calnex/). The monitoring 

operations for both studies occurred during the early to mid-summer and extended over

Southern California and the Central Valley. A synthesis of policy relevant findings has 

been published (http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/csd/projects/calnex/synthesisreport.pdf) .

Another PM2.5 relevant field study, the San Joaquin Valley portion of the Deriving 

Information on Surface Conditions from Column and Vertically Resolved Observations 

Relevant to Air Quality (DISCOVER-AQ) was conducted from mid-January through midFebruary 2013 (http://www-air.larc.nasa.gov/missions/discover-aq/discover-aq.html). 

Data analysis is currently in progress. 

A-11
4. NATURE AND EXTENT OF THE PM2.5 PROBLEM

a. Current air quality

The geography of the San Joaquin Valley, along with large-scale regional and local 

weather patterns, influence the accumulation, formation and, dispersion of air pollutants. 

Covering nearly 25,000 square miles, the Valley is a lowland area bordered by the 

Sierra Nevada Mountains to the east, the Pacific Coast range to the west, and the 

Tehachapi Mountains to the south. The mountains act as air flow barriers, with the 

resulting stagnant conditions favoring the accumulation of pollutants. To the north, the 

Valley borders the Sacramento Valley and Delta lowland, which allows for some level of 

pollutant dispersion. As a result of geography and meteorology, PM2.5 concentrations 

are generally higher in the southern and central portions of the Valley. 

To determine attainment for the annual PM2.5 standards, the corresponding design 

value at each monitoring site must be calculated following U.S. EPA protocols. The

annual design value represents a three year average of the annual average PM2.5 

concentrations measured at the site. If the annual design value is equal to or below 

15.0 μg/m3

, the site attains the standard. Meteorological conditions related to the 

prevalent drought lead to elevated PM2.5 concentrations in the SJV during the 

2013/2014 winter. These elevated wintertime concentrations affected both 24-hour and 

annual average concentrations. 

Figure 3 shows the 2013 annual PM2.5 design values throughout the San Joaquin 

Valley(1). Although meteorological conditions associated with the drought lead to higher 

annual PM2.5 concentrations in 2013, seven sites remain below the standard. Sites 

above the standard are focused in the central and southern Valley(2). 

A-12
Figure 3. 2013 annual PM2.5 design values

(1) Comparisons of PM2.5 concentrations recorded at collocated or closely located FRM and FEM 

monitors have shown that FEM monitors record higher concentrations (e.g. the monitors in Merced). 

(2) The representativeness of the Madera design value is further discussed in Appendix A2.

(3) Fresno Combined includes partial data from the old Fresno 1st and new Fresno-Garland sites. 

The 24-hour PM2.5 design value represents a three-year average of the 98th percentile 

of the measured PM2.5 concentrations. Depending on a site’s 24-hour PM2.5 data 

collection schedule, the 98th percentile usually corresponds to a value between the 2nd

and the 8th highest value. If the design value is equal to or below 65 μg/m3

, the site 

attains the standard. Based on 2013 24-hour design values, all sites in the Valley attain 

the standard (Figure 4).

Figure 4. 2013 24-hour PM2.5 design values

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

PM2.5 Design Value (ug/m3)

2013 Annual Design Values

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

PM2.5 Design Value (ug/m3)

2013 24-hour Design Values

(2)

15 μg/m3 annual 

standard

65 μg/m3 24-hour standard

(3)

A-13
b. Seasonal variability

PM2.5 concentrations in the San Joaquin Valley exhibit a strong seasonal pattern, with 

highest concentrations occurring from November through February (Figure 5). During 

the winter, PM2.5 builds up over several days or weeks. These PM2.5 episodes are 

caused by increased activity in some emission sources and by meteorological 

conditions that are conducive to the build-up and formation of PM2.5. During the winter, 

high-pressure weather systems over California can cause the atmosphere to become 

stagnant for extended periods leading to temperature inversions. Under normal 

conditions, temperature decreases with altitude, allowing free upward air flow dispersing

emissions and pollutants. In contrast, a temperature inversion positions a layer of 

warmer air above cooler air, impeding upward flow of emissions and air pollutants. 

Often the inversion layer is lower than the mountains surrounding the Valley, trapping 

emissions and pollutants in the Valley. Winter month PM2.5 concentrations drive the 

annual average concentrations. 

Figure 5. Seasonal variation in PM2.5 concentration at Bakersfield-California.

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Concentrations (ug/m3)

Month

2011-2013 Monthly Average PM2.5 

Concentration at Bakersfield-California

A-14
c. Chemical composition

Examination of the chemical make-up of PM2.5 provides another important element in 

understanding the nature of PM2.5 in the Valley and specifically identifying contributing 

sources. The pie charts in Figure 6 show the current chemical components that 

contribute to PM2.5 levels on an annual average basis at urban sites in the southern 

(Bakersfield), central (Fresno), and northern (Modesto) regions of the Valley. Figure 7

shows the chemical components contributing to peak day PM2.5 levels at the same 

sites. While the relative percentages vary, in all cases the major components are 

ammonium nitrate and organic material (organic carbon). 

Ammonium nitrate is the largest contributor to PM2.5 levels, constituting about 

40 percent of annual PM2.5 levels at the three sites. On peak PM2.5 days, the

ammonium nitrate contribution is higher, approximately 50 to 65 percent. Ammonium 

nitrate is formed in the atmosphere from chemical reactions of NOx and ammonia. 

Sources emitting NOx include motor vehicles and stationary combustion sources. The 

largest sources of ammonia are livestock operations and fertilizer application. The 

stagnant, cold, and damp conditions that occur during the winter promote the formation 

and accumulation of ammonium nitrate. Additional information on ammonium nitrate 

formation can be found in section 5. 

The organic matter component contributor of PM2.5 levels is largest in the central and 

northern portions of the Valley. On an annual and peak day basis, organic matter 

constitutes about 30 percent of PM2.5 at Modesto and Fresno compared to less than 

about 20 percent at Bakersfield. Activities such as residential wood combustion, 

cooking, biomass burning, and direct tailpipe emissions from mobile sources contribute 

to the PM2.5 level organic matter component. 

Ammonium sulfate contributes approximately ten percent of annual PM2.5 levels at 

each of the three sites. On peak days, the ammonium sulfate contribution is lower, 

about five percent. Ammonium sulfate is also formed in the atmosphere from SOx 

emitted from combustion sources and ammonia from sources like livestock operations 

and fertilizer application. 

Geological material or dust contributes approximately 15 percent to the annual PM2.5 

levels at Bakersfield, while at Fresno and Modesto it contributes about 5 percent. The 

geological material contribution to peak day PM2.5 levels is less than half of the 

contribution to annual PM2.5 levels. Geological material is directly emitted PM2.5 and 

comes from dust suspended into the air by vehicle travel on roads, soil from agricultural 

activities, and other dust producing activities such as construction. 

Elemental carbon contributes less than five percent to the annual as well as the peak 

day PM2.5 levels at the three sites. Elemental carbon is directly emitted PM2.5 and 

comes from mobile and stationary combustion sources, with significant contributions 

from diesel sources.

A-15
Figure 6. Three-year annual average 

PM2.5 chemical composition

Figure 7. Three-year average high day 

PM2.5 chemical composition

Ammonium 

Nitrate

41%

Ammonium 

Sulfate

14%

Organic 

Matter

23%

EC

6%

Geological

14%

Elements

2%

a) Bakersfield

2010-2012 Average Composition

Ammonium 

Nitrate

64%

Ammonium 

Sulfate

6%

Organic 

Matter

18%

EC

5%

Geological

6%

Elements

1%

a) Bakersfield

2011-2013 Peak Day Composition

Ammonium 

Nitrate

39%

Ammonium 

Sulfate

11%

Organic 

Matter

33%

EC

7%

Geological

7%

Elements

3%

b) Fresno

2011-2013 Average Composition

Ammonium 

Nitrate

38%

Ammonium 

Sulfate

12%

Organic 

Matter

34%

EC

6%

Geological

6%

Elements

4%

c) Modesto

2011-2013 Average Composition

Ammonium 

Nitrate

56%

Ammonium 

Sulfate

4%

Organic 

Matter

30%

EC

6%

Geological

2% Elements

2%

b) Fresno

2011-2013 Peak Day Composition

Ammonium 

Nitrate

53%

Ammonium 

Sulfate

5%

Organic 

Matter

32%

EC

6%

Geological

2% Elements

2%

c) Modesto

2011-2013 Peak Day Composition

A-16
5. SECONDARY AMMONIUM NITRATE FORMATION 

a. Chemistry

As discussed previously, the cooler temperatures and higher humidity of the winter 

months are conducive to ammonium nitrate formation through a complex process 

involving NOx, ammonia, and VOCs. This occurs both at the surface and aloft, via both 

daytime and nighttime chemistry. Understanding the interactions amongst these 

precursors is needed to design an appropriate and effective approach to reduce 

ammonium nitrate. 

During the day, NO2 is oxidized to nitric acid (HNO3). This daytime pathway also

involves sunlight, VOCs, and background ozone: 

 O3 OH Main oxidant is OH

NO NO2 HNO3 Requires high sunlight, VOC rich environment

During the night, nitric acid is formed through oxidation of NO2 (via N2O5) by 

background ozone: 

 O3 O3 H2O Main Oxidant is Ozone (O3)

NO NO2 NO3 N2O5 2 HNO3 Favors low sunlight intensity,

 wet conditions

The nitric acid formed from these reactions then combines with ammonia (NH3) to form 

ammonium nitrate (NH4NO3):

HNO3 + NH3 NH4NO3

Since the chemistry of NOx to nitric acid formation involves multiple steps and also 

depends on the availability of oxidants, only a portion of the NOx emitted ultimately 

forms ammonium nitrate. An early photochemical modeling study applying a box model 

to a typical winter episode in the San Joaquin Valley found that approximately 

33 percent of the molecules of emitted NOx were converted to ammonium nitrate 

(Stockwell et. al. 2000). A subsequent study that modeled the January 4-6, 1996 

episode in the San Joaquin Valley with the University California Davis/California 

Institute of Technology (UCD-CIT) photochemical transport model found that on 

average, only 13 to 18 percent of the emitted NOx (expressed as NO2) was converted 

to ammonium nitrate (Kleeman et. al. 2005). The fraction of NOx converted varied by 

location, with urban regions converting little NOx to ammonium nitrate, while in remote 

areas up to 70 percent NOx was converted. 

NOx emissions mostly originate from urban traffic and transportation corridors, while 

ammonia is primarily generated from livestock operations and fertilizer applications. 

A-17
Analysis of CRPAQS measurements suggest that, on average, daytime production of 

nitric acid in the San Joaquin Valley is relatively slow, and that nighttime production is 

the more dominant pathway (Lurmann et al. 2006). Although daytime mixing is limited, 

NOx and ammonia emitted during the day can be mixed upward where nighttime 

interactions can occur more regionally to form ammonium nitrate. Based on analyses 

conducted to characterize the atmospheric transport and dispersion processes during 

the winter CRPAQS episodes, MacDonald et al. (2006) found that the ammonium 

nitrate that is formed aloft during the night is subsequently entrained into the daytime 

boundary layer. This was observed through a rapid rise in hourly ammonium nitrate 

concentrations which coincided with the growth of the surface mixed layer (Watson and 

Chow 2002). These mechanisms help explain the more regional distribution of 

ammonium nitrate that is observed throughout the Valley. 

b. Limiting precursor concept

The amount of ammonium nitrate produced will depend on the relative atmospheric 

abundance of its precursors – VOCs, NOx, and ammonia (NH3). It is therefore 

important to understand which precursor controls are most effective in reducing 

ammonium nitrate concentrations. In simple terms, the precursor in shortest supply will 

limit how much ammonium nitrate is produced. This is known as the “limiting” 

precursor. The following figures provide an illustration of this concept. As shown in 

Figure 8, each molecule of ammonia pairs with one NOx molecule to produce one 

molecule of ammonium nitrate. In this example, there are more ammonia molecules 

than NOx, and therefore not all of the ammonia participates in forming ammonium 

nitrate, i.e. there is “excess” ammonia. Figure 9 illustrates the impact of reducing NOx. 

Here, a reduction in NOx, the less abundant precursor, leads to a commensurate 

reduction in ammonium nitrate. In contrast, Figure 10 illustrates that a larger reduction 

in the more abundant precursor, ammonia, results in no reduction in ammonium nitrate, 

as the ammonia reduced did not participate in ammonium nitrate production.

Figure 8. Ammonium nitrate formation.

A-18
Figure 9. Reducing the less abundant precursor is more effective in reducing 

ammonium nitrate.

Figure 10. Reducing the more abundant precursor is less effective in reducing 

ammonium nitrate. 

The following sections describe the current state of the science regarding the role of 

ammonia, VOCs, and NOx in ammonium nitrate formation and identify the most 

effective precursors for control.

c. Role of ammonia in ammonium nitrate formation 

A number of different studies and analyses were evaluated to understand the role of 

ammonia in ammonium nitrate formation in the San Joaquin Valley. These included: 

a) comparison of the magnitude of the NOx and ammonia emissions inventories, 

b) ambient measurements of ammonia, nitric acid, and particulate ammonium; and 

c) photochemical modeling analyses of ammonium nitrate sensitivity to precursor 

emission reductions. While evaluation of emissions inventory and ambient data can 

provide indications of the relative abundance of different precursors, photochemical 

models provide a tool to quantitatively evaluate the impact of reducing precursor 

emissions on resulting ammonium nitrate concentrations.

A-19
Emission inventory 

As discussed in the limiting precursor section, the precursor in shortest supply limits the 

amount of ammonium nitrate formation. An evaluation of the magnitude of NOx and 

ammonia emissions provides a first level assessment of the relative abundance of these 

two precursors. Table 1 lists NOx and ammonia winter and annual average emissions 

in the current inventory for two years (2012 and 2020). As Figure 1 in the limiting 

precursor section illustrated, in simple terms it takes one molecule of NOx and one 

molecule of ammonia to form one molecule of ammonium nitrate. However, due to 

differing molecular weights, one ton of NOx contains fewer molecules than one ton of 

ammonia. Therefore it is most appropriate to make an emissions inventory comparison 

after normalizing for molecular weight. 

Due to emission source test procedures, most NOx emissions are expressed in terms of 

nitrogen dioxide (NO2). Since one NO2 molecule weighs 46 universal atomic units (u) 

and one NH3 molecule weighs 17 u, one ton of NH3 has 2.7 times (46 u/17 u) the 

number of molecules as one ton of NO2. Dividing the NOx emissions by 2.7 therefore 

provides a common basis for comparison to the ammonia emissions. On this 

normalized comparison basis, ammonia is significantly more abundant than NOx, 

particularly in the future year (Table 1). In addition, as noted in the chemistry section, 

only a portion on the NOx is ultimately converted to ammonium nitrate. 

Table 1. Comparison of NOx and ammonia emissions in selected years a) during the 

winter and b) on an annual average basis.

a)

Year Winter NH3

emissions (tpd)

Winter NOx 

emissions (tpd) 

Normalized NOx 

emissions (tpd)

2012 310 318 118

2020 339 198 73

b)

Year Annual NH3

emissions (tpd)

Annual NOx 

emissions (tpd) 

Normalized NOx 

emissions (tpd)

2012 330 332 123

2020 358 207 77

A-20
Monitoring studies

Ambient measurements of precursor concentrations provide another method to 

investigate the relative abundance of each precursor and therefore which is most 

effective for control of ammonium nitrate. Blanchard, et al. (2000) examined two 

metrics using ambient data collected during the IMS-95 field program in the San 

Joaquin Valley. The first parameter was the excess of particulate ammonium plus gasphase ammonia over the sum of nitric acid, particulate nitrate, and particulate sulfate. 

The second was the ratio of particulate to total nitrate concentrations. Both metrics 

indicated an excess of ammonia in most IMS-95 samples and concluded that greater 

reductions in aerosol nitrate would occur when nitric acid was reduced rather than 

ammonia. 

Lurmann, et al. (2006) also compared ammonia and nitric acid ambient concentrations 

measured in the San Joaquin Valley during the winter of 2000/2001 as part of 

CRPAQS. Figures 11 and 12 show the concentrations of nitric acid and ammonia 

measured at the rural Angiola site and at the urban Fresno site. At both sites ammonia 

concentrations are generally at least an order of magnitude higher than the nitric acid 

concentrations. These ammonia-rich conditions throughout the Valley indicate that, 

during the winter, nitric acid rather than ammonia is the limiting precursor. 

Figure 11. Comparison of ammonia and nitric acid concentrations measured at Angiola 

during the winter of 2000/2001 as part of CRPAQS.

Comparison of Ammonia and Nitric Acid Concentrations 

Angiola - Winter 2000/2001

-10

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

-2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18

HNO3 Concentration (ug-N/m3)

NH3 Concentration (ug-N/m3)

1:1 Line

A-21
Figure 12. Comparison of ammonia and nitric acid concentrations measured at Fresno 

during the winter of 2000/2001 as part of CRPAQS.

The amount of gaseous ammonia (NH3) compared to particulate ammonium (NH4) 

provides another indicator of how much of the ammonia is converted to ammonium 

nitrate and therefore whether there is excess ammonia available. These measurements 

were collected at a larger number of sites during CRPAQS. Figure 13 shows the 

concentrations of particulate ammonium and gaseous ammonia at three urban sites 

(Fresno-1st, Bakersfield-California, and Bakersfield-residential), and three rural sites 

(Angiola, Pixley, and Feedlot) measured during the 2000/2001 winter CRPAQS 

episode. Overall, the levels of particulate ammonium at all sites are comparable, 

consistent with a regional formation mechanism of ammonium nitrate. Although 

ammonia concentrations are higher at the rural sites, especially at the Feedlot site, 

there is still a large amount of ammonia at each site beyond the amount that reacted 

with nitric acid to form ammonium nitrate. Again, these ammonia rich conditions 

indicate that nitric acid, rather than ammonia is the limiting precursor.

Comparison of Ammonia and Nitric Acid Concentrations 

Fresno - Winter 2000/2001

-4

0

4

8

12

16

20

-2 0 2 4 6 8

HNO3 Concentration (ug-N/m3)

NH3 Concentration (ug-N/m3)

1:1 Line

A-22
Figure 13. Comparison of particulate ammonium and gaseous ammonia 

concentrations measured throughout the SJV during the winter of 2000/2001 as part of 

CRPAQS.

Photochemical modeling

In contrast to the previous analyses, photochemical models provide a quantitative 

approach to simulate the effects that emission reductions in each of the gaseous 

precursors would have on the predicted ammonium nitrate concentrations. A number of 

modeling studies have been conducted by ARB staff and academic researchers to 

evaluate precursor sensitivity. 

An investigation of precursor limitations for the January 4-6, 1996 PM2.5 episode 

measured in San Joaquin Valley as part of the IMS-95 field study used the UCD-CIT

model. This sensitivity analysis revealed that NOx controls were the most effective 

control strategy to reduce PM2.5 ammonium nitrate concentrations (Kleeman, et al. 

2005). In this study, a 50 percent reduction in NOx emissions resulted in a 25 percent 

reduction in total nitrate, while a 50 percent reduction in ammonia emissions resulted in 

a 10 percent reduction in total nitrate. The results of this analysis are shown graphically 

across the entire San Joaquin Valley in Figure 14.

Urban Rural 

A-23
Figure 14. Particulate nitrate reductions in response to 50 percent reductions in 

precursor emissions on January 6, 1996.

In 2006, ARB staff modeled air quality during the three week winter CRPAQS episode 

using U.S. EPA’s Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model with Californiaspecific modifications and corrections (Liang et al. 2006). Figure 15 illustrates the 

effects that reducing the emissions of ammonia and NOx have on ammonium nitrate 

levels. This modeling indicated that reducing ammonia emissions by 50 percent 

reduced ammonium nitrate by less than 5 percent. On the other hand, reducing NOx

emission by 50 percent reduced ammonium nitrate concentrations by approximately 

35 percent. This analysis, therefore, indicated that reducing NOx emissions was the 

most beneficial control strategy to reduce ammonium nitrate. 

A-24
Figure 15. Percent ammonium nitrate reduction in response to 50 percent reduction in 

NOx or ammonia emission reductions at Fresno during the winter of 2000/2001.

In another study based on sensitivity analyses using CMAQ-Madrid simulations of the 

December 2000 CRPAQS episode, Pun et al. (2009) found that a 50 percent reduction 

in NOx emissions reduced ammonium nitrate by approximately 50 percent at rural sites 

and between 30-45 percent at Bakersfield. As shown in Figure 16, a 50 percent 

reduction in ammonia emissions did not have a significant effect on ammonium nitrate 

concentrations at urban sites. At the rural site of Angiola, ammonium nitrate 

concentrations decreased between 10 and 25 percent. However, such reductions in 

ammonium nitrate occurred only towards the end of the episode, when PM2.5 

concentrations at the rural site measured approximately 80 μg/m3 and concentrations at 

the urban site recorded over 110 μg/m3 (Figure 9). At the end of the episode, PM2.5 

concentrations at Bakersfield peaked at 155 μg/m3 (January 5, 2001). For the most 

part, the San Joaquin Valley does not currently reach those PM2.5 concentration levels. 

Figure 17 shows a comparison of PM2.5 concentrations during the CRPAQS and the 

2013/2014 PM2.5 episodes from November 1 through February 5 when the highest 

PM2.5 concentrations were recorded in the last 10 years. In addition, Pun et al. noted 

that under wintertime conditions, nitric acid concentrations in the SJV were small and 

therefore ammonium nitrate formation was generally limited by the availability of nitric 

acid rather than ammonia.

-60%

-50%

-40%

-30%

-20%

-10%

0%

Percent Nitrate Reduced

50% NOx Reduction 50% Ammonia Reduction

A-25
Figure 16. Time series with daily observations, base case simulation results and 

results from the sensitivity cases of (a) nitrate and (b) PM2.5 at Angiola (left) and 

Bakersfield (right). (Source: Pun et al., 2009, excerpt from Figure 2, pg. 406).

Figure 17. Comparison of PM2.5 concentrations at Bakersfield during the 2000/2001 

CRPAQS winter episode and the winters of 2013/2014. 

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

1-Nov8-Nov

15-Nov22-Nov29-Nov

6-Dec

13-Dec20-Dec27-Dec

3-Jan

10-Jan17-Jan24-Jan31-Jan

Concentrations (ug/m3)

2013/2014 Winter vs. CRPAQS - Bakersfield

2013

CRPAQS

A-26
In 2012, as part of the emission control strategy development for the San Joaquin 

Valley PM2.5 Plan for the federal 35 μg/m3 24-hour standard, ARB staff conducted 

modeling using CMAQ to simulate the response of PM2.5 concentrations to reductions 

in PM2.5 precursors in 2019 throughout the Valley (SJV 2012 PM2.5 Plan; Chen, et al. 

2014). Simulations were run during the first and fourth quarters (January–March and 

October-December) of 2019. In the San Joaquin Valley, high PM2.5 values in the first 

and fourth quarters drive the annual average concentrations to be over the annual 

PM2.5 standard. 

Per the analysis above, Table 2 compares the modeled effect on the 2019 24-hour 

PM2.5 design value obtained at each monitoring site from a 25 percent reduction in the 

specified precursor. The information is normalized to reflect the reduction in design 

value per ton of each precursor reduced. Consistently, direct PM2.5 reductions have 

the most benefit, followed by NOx reductions. Reductions in ammonia and SOx provide 

much smaller benefits. While on an annual average basis, SOx emission reductions are 

quite effective in reducing PM2.5 concentrations, during the winter they are less 

effective since ammonium sulfate is more prevalent during the non-winter months. 

Reductions in VOCs result in small disbenefits at most sites. On a relative basis, 

Valley-wide reductions in ammonia are approximately nine times less effective than 

NOx and over 35 times less effective than PM2.5. 

Table 2. Modeled PM2.5 air quality benefit per ton of valley-wide precursor emission 

reductions. 

Monitoring Site

Reduction in 2019 PM2.5 Design Value 

(μg/m3 per ton reduction)

PM2.5 NOx NH3 SOx VOC

Bakersfield-California 0.34 0.08 0.008 0.08 -0.001

Bakersfield-Planz 0.29 0.08 0.009 0.08 -0.001

Visalia 0.27 0.07 0.005 0.04 -0.001

Corcoran 0.25 0.09 0.010 0.04 -0.003

Fresno-1st 0.31 0.06 0.008 0.04 0.000

Fresno-Hamilton 0.28 0.06 0.007 0.05 0.001

Clovis 0.25 0.07 0.008 0.04 0.000

Modesto 0.19 0.04 0.006 0.08 0.000

Merced 0.19 0.05 0.005 0.05 0.000

Stockton 0.14 0.03 0.007 0.09 0.000

Figure 18 shows the results of modeling sensitivity runs plotted on isopleth diagrams for 

Bakersfield-California site for all precursors relative to NOx. These diagrams reflect the 

change in the 2019 24-hour PM2.5 design value relative to reduction in precursor 

emissions. The diagrams illustrate that because ammonia emission are much more 

A-27
abundant than NOx emission, the atmosphere is more responsive to reductions in NOx 

emissions as compared to ammonia. Controlling NOx emissions in turn have significant 

benefits at reducing PM2.5 levels as ammonium nitrate is a large component. 

Figure 18. Bakersfield–California Isopleth Diagrams

Chen et al. (2014) reported that in the San Joaquin Valley, 2019 24-hour PM2.5 design 

values showed strong responses to emission reductions in directly emitted PM2.5 and 

NOx. At Bakersfield-California, a 50 percent reduction in PM2.5 emissions and NOx 

emissions decreased the 2019 24-hour PM2.5 design value by 27 percent and 

24 percent, respectively. In contrast, a 50 percent reduction in ammonia emissions 

a) NOx vs. SOx b) NOx vs. VOC

c) NOx vs. Ammonia d) NOx vs. PM2.5

A-28
decreased the design value by approximately 4 percent. In further detail, a 50 percent 

reduction in NOx emissions resulted in an approximate 42 percent drop in nitrate 

concentrations at Bakersfield, comparable to the reductions reported by Pun et al. 

(2009). Reductions in SOx emissions had a minor effect on the PM2.5 24-hour design 

values, since ammonium sulfate is a minor component of winter-time PM2.5 levels. 

VOC reductions slightly increased PM2.5 concentrations. The authors noted similar 

responses to PM2.5 precursors at Fresno. On average, at the other seven monitoring 

sites in the San Joaquin Valley, a 50 percent reduction in NOx emissions lowered 

PM2.5 approximately 23 percent, while a 50 percent reduction in ammonia emissions

lowered PM2.5 by 5 percent. The authors conclude these results demonstrate that in 

the San Joaquin Valley in 2019, ammonium nitrate formation will be generally limited by 

nitric acid rather than ammonia. 

Due to the highest PM2.5 concentrations occurring in Kern County, ARB staff 

conducted specific model sensitivity runs to evaluate the benefits of emission reductions 

focused on the nonattainment sub-area as part of the SJV 2012 PM2.5 Plan. The Kern 

County sensitivity runs demonstrated that one ton per day of PM2.5 reductions provided

a 1 μg/m3 improvement in the Bakersfield-California 2019 24-hour PM2.5 design value; 

one ton per day of NOx reductions provided for a 0.12 μg/m3 improvement while one ton 

per day of ammonia reductions provided for a 0.02 μg/m3 improvement and one ton per 

day of VOC reductions had no effect. 

These modeling results, along with the findings from past modeling and monitoring 

studies continue to highlight that reductions in directly emitted PM2.5 emissions provide 

the most benefit, followed by NOx emissions in reducing PM2.5 concentrations and 

making progress towards attainment. Ammonia emission reductions are approximately 

an order of magnitude less effective. VOC emission reductions do not provide air 

quality benefits. Taken together, the emission inventory, monitoring data, and precursor 

sensitivity analyses all indicate that in the San Joaquin Valley, NOx, rather than 

ammonia is the limiting precursor for ammonium nitrate formation. 

A-29
d. Role of VOC in ammonium nitrate formation

A number of studies have also been examined regarding the role of VOCs in 

ammonium nitrate formation. These include both monitoring studies conducted as part 

of CRPAQS, as well as studies that used differing types of air quality modeling to 

quantitatively assess the expected change in ammonium nitrate to hypothetical VOC 

reductions. 

Monitoring studies

As previously mentioned, there are two primary pathways through which ammonium 

nitrate can form. During the day, NO2 is oxidized to nitric acid. Nitric acid then reacts 

with ammonia to form ammonium nitrate. This daytime nitric acid formation pathway 

involves sunlight, VOCs, and background ozone. During the night, nitric acid is formed 

through oxidation of NO2 (via N2O5) by background ozone, which then also reacts with 

ammonia to form ammonium nitrate. Studies by Pun et al. (1998, 2004) suggested that 

the daytime pathway may be important and therefore the formation of ammonium nitrate 

would be sensitive to changes in VOC emissions. However, other studies (Lurmann et 

al., 2006), suggest that on average, daytime production of nitric acid in the San Joaquin 

Valley is relatively slow and that nighttime production of ammonium nitrate aloft, which 

then mixes to the surface after sunrise could explain the observed homogeneous 

patterns of ammonium nitrate in the Valley. Ying et al. (2009) also theorized that the 

ozone concentration aloft in the San Joaquin Valley is predominantly due to the regional 

background and does not vary significantly with surface-level VOC emissions. 

Therefore, nighttime ammonium nitrate formation in the San Joaquin Valley would not 

be sensitive to VOC reductions.

While the monitoring studies cited above provide evidence that the VOC pathway may 

be important at times, these studies do not provide quantitative information about the 

overall role of and cannot be used to evaluate the benefits of, VOC controls. Rather, 

modeling studies are more appropriate to assess the overall impact of precursor 

controls. 

Photochemical modeling 

Staff reviewed the results of six modeling studies containing information on the 

significance of VOC controls in reducing ammonium nitrate in the San Joaquin Valley. 

While the results of the earliest studies were mixed, later studies provide generally 

consistent results regarding the role of VOCs. In assessing the potential benefits of 

VOC controls it is important that significance be interpreted in the context of California’s 

overall control program with its strong focus on NOx control to achieve benefits for both 

PM2.5 and ozone. 

Two early studies used simplified box modeling to explore the sensitivity of ammonium 

nitrate to VOC and NOx reductions. One of the two studies simulated a typical winter 

episode (Stockwell et al., 2000) and found that decreases in VOC emissions had little 

effect. The second study (Pun and Seigneur, 2001) simulated winter conditions during 

A-30
the 1996 IMS-95 pilot study around the Fresno area. The study found that ammonium 

nitrate formation decreased with VOC emission reductions, but increased with NOx 

reductions. Pun and Seigneur (2001) theorized that reducing NOx could lead to higher 

concentrations of the hydroxyl radical (OH) and increase the overall rate of nitrate 

production, despite the reductions in NOx. However, the box modeling approach used 

had a number of limitations, including lack of transport into/out of the box, robust vertical 

transport, and use of an older chemical mechanism. In addition, the VOC emissions 

were increased by a factor of two to improve model performance. As such, the box 

modeling did not fully represent the complete scope of atmospheric variations and has 

limited usefulness in assessing the responsiveness to VOC controls.

Subsequent modeling sensitivity studies for the same winter episode were conducted 

with the UCD-CIT model, an advanced research grade modeling system (Kleeman et 

al., 2005). The authors concluded that NOx emission controls are more effective in 

reducing PM2.5 nitrate concentrations in the San Joaquin Valley. Summary study 

results indicate that on average, large reductions in VOC emissions (on the order of 

50 percent) reduced PM2.5 nitrate concentrations by approximately 17 percent. 

However, to evaluate the significance and effectiveness of VOC controls in the context 

of control strategy design, the study’s isopleths of PM2.5 nitrate response to combined 

NOx/VOC emission reductions provide more in-depth information.

Figures 19 (a) and 20 (a) show that, based on the shapes of the graphs, NOx controls 

are the most effective approach to reduce PM2.5 nitrate concentrations at Fresno and 

at the location with the highest modeled PM2.5 nitrate concentration (grid location -

85 km Northing, 90 km Easting) respectively. Once NOx controls are taken into 

consideration, VOC emission reductions produce essentially no benefit, and in some 

instances may actually lead to an increase in PM2.5 nitrate concentrations. For 

example, as illustrated in Figure 19 (a) for Fresno, after considering an approximately 

70 percent reduction in NOx emissions resulting from existing and proposed controls, 

reductions in VOC emissions to any level would not decrease PM2.5 nitrate 

concentrations. Furthermore, at grid location -85 km Northing, 90 km Easting

(Figure 20 (a)), any level of VOC emission reductions would actually cause an increase 

in nitrate concentrations. Nitrogen-containing molecules such as PAN can act as 

temporary sinks for nitrogen dioxide (NO2). When VOCs are controlled, the reduced 

availability of certain radicals, which are generated from VOCs, reduces the amount of 

NO2 that is sequestered, thereby increasing the availability of NO2 and enhancing 

ammonium nitrate formation (Meng et al., 1997). 

A-31
Figure 19. 24-hour average NOx/VOC particulate nitrate isopleths at Fresno for (a) all 

sources, (b) diesel engines, (c) catalyst equipped gasoline engines, and (d) upwind 

sources of nitrate. Units are μg/m3

. (Source: Kleeman et al., 2005, Figure 3 pg. 5333). 

A-32
Figure 20. 24-hour average NOx/VOC particulate nitrate isopleths at grid 

location -85 km Northing, 90 km Easting for (a) all sources, (b) diesel engines, 

(c) catalyst equipped gasoline engines, and (d) upwind sources of nitrate. Units are 

μg/m3. (Source: Kleeman et al., 2005, Figure 5 pg. 5335). 

Three additional modeling studies investigated the two-week winter episode of 

2000-2001 that occurred during the CRPAQS field study. 

In the first study, preliminary data from modeling of this CRPAQS winter episode 

conducted using the Lagrangian form of the UCD-CIT model qualitatively confirm that 

NOx control is the most efficient method to reduce nitrate concentrations (Kleeman, 

M.J., personal communication, May 2008). Figure 21 illustrates the response of PM2.5 

nitrate concentrations to NOx and VOC emission reductions at a rural (Angiola) and an 

urban (Fresno) site on December 31, 2000. Again, based on their shapes, these 

graphs show that NOx controls are the most effective approach to reduce PM2.5 nitrate 

A-33
concentrations. Once NOx controls are taken into consideration (approximately 

70 percent reduction in NOx emissions), reductions in VOCs of up to 30 percent 

produce basically no benefit (Fresno). Furthermore, at some locations (Angiola) any 

VOC emission reductions may actually lead to an increase in PM2.5 nitrate 

concentrations.

Figure 21. The isopleths plot of PM2.5 nitrate with emission control of NOx and VOC at 

Angiola (ANG) and Fresno (FEI) after a five-day back trajectory simulation for 

December 31, 2000. Units are in μg/m3

. (Source: Kleeman, M.J., personal 

communication, May 2008). 

A second study conducted simulations of the two-week CRPAQS episode with the 

CMAQ photochemical model (Livingston, et al., 2009). The study consisted of two 

simulations. The first was a baseline scenario using a preliminary emissions inventory. 

This simulation showed that 50 percent reductions in anthropogenic VOC and NOx 

emissions had similar effects in reducing ammonium nitrate (about 20 percent each). A 

second simulation was conducted using an updated emission inventory representing a 

more accurate spatial distribution of total ammonia emissions (referred to as “Vehicle 

NH3” scenario, per Livingston, P., personal communication, January 19, 2011). This 

second 50 percent VOC reduction simulation showed a much lower response to VOC 

controls. The response was lowered to a 12 percent reduction in ammonium nitrate, 

with a corresponding increase in responsiveness to NOx control of 38 percent reduction 

in ammonium nitrate. These results are consistent with those found by Kleeman et al., 

2005.

A third study modeled one week of the CRPAQS episode using a version of CMAQ with 

a more advanced chemical mechanism (CMAQ-Madrid) (Pun et al, 2009). In contrast to 

the earlier Pun study using a simplified box modeling approach, this later work found 

A-34
that on average, nitrate was most sensitive to reductions in NOx emissions. While 

isopleths were not provided, the time evolution of nitrate and PM2.5 mass to VOC 

response illustrated in Figure 22 provides further details regarding the efficacy of VOC 

control. The response of nitrate to a 50 percent reduction in VOC emissions increased 

as PM2.5 levels rose during the episode. In urban areas, a 50 percent reduction in 

anthropogenic VOC emissions caused small reductions in nitrate, on the order of 

10 percent, on the modeled days when 24-hour PM2.5 concentrations measured over 

100 μg/m3 at urban sites and above 65 μg/m3 in rural areas.

The difference in the VOC response on the days with the higher PM2.5 concentrations 

as compared to those days with lower concentrations may be due to a difference in the 

chemical formation regime for nitrate. In general, there is sufficient background ozone 

to generate enough free radicals to initiate and propagate the chemistry of nitrate 

formation (Ying et. al, 2009). However, on days with high PM2.5 concentrations, the 

daytime photochemistry may have contributed to a rapid increase in nitrate, resulting in 

higher VOC and NOx sensitivity. It does not appear that VOCs contributed significantly 

to the free radical budget on the simulated days mainly because rapid increases in 

ozone were not observed. The effect of VOC levels on nitrate formation may also have 

a diurnal pattern since the hydroxyl and hydroperoxyl radical levels are high during the 

daytime and negligible at night. In addition, more reactive VOCs react quickly during 

the day and there is a minimal carry over to the next day. Therefore, it is reasonable to 

assume that the higher response to VOC and NOx at higher PM2.5 concentrations may 

be due to the nitrate formation mechanism rather than to PM2.5 accumulation due to 

the length of the episode. 

Overall, nitrate was only responsive to a 50 percent reduction in VOCs at PM2.5 levels 

that are no longer reached in the San Joaquin Valley. Currently, the 24-hour PM2.5 

design value in the Valley is 65 μg/m3 recorded at Bakersfield and the rest of the Valley 

records 24-hour design values between 30 μg/m3 and 63 μg/m3. Given the current 

levels of PM2.5, we believe the Valley is now in a nitrate chemical formation regime that 

is less responsive to VOC controls.

A-35
Figure 22. Time series with daily observations, base case simulation results and 

results from the sensitivity cases of (a) nitrate and (b) PM2.5 at Angiola (left) and 

Bakersfield (right). (Source: Pun et al., 2009, excerpt from Figure 2, pg. 406).

As mention earlier, in 2012, as part of the emission control strategy development for the 

San Joaquin Valley Plan for the federal 35 μg/m3 24-hour standard, ARB staff 

conducted modeling using CMAQ to simulate the response of PM2.5 concentrations to 

reductions in PM2.5 precursors in 2019 throughout the Valley (SJV 2012 PM2.5 Plan; 

Chen et al., 2014). Table 2 provided the modeled effect on the 2019 24-hour PM2.5 

design value obtained at each monitoring site from a 25 percent reduction in the 

specified precursor. The information is presented normalized to reflect the reduction in 

design value per ton of each precursor reduced. Consistently, direct PM2.5 reductions 

have the most benefit, followed by NOx reductions. Reductions in VOCs result in small 

disbenefits at most sites. Valley-wide reductions in PM2.5 are approximately four times 

as effective as NOx. In contrast, reductions in VOCs result in either no impact of very 

small disbenefits. 

Figure 23 again shows the results of modeling sensitivity runs plotted on isopleth 

diagrams for Bakersfield-California site with NOx vs VOCs highlighted. Reductions in 

NOx have significant benefits in reducing PM2.5 design values. On the other hand, 

reducing VOCs leads to very small increases in the design value because these 

A-36
reductions have the effect of making more NOx available for nitric acid, and subsequent 

ammonium nitrate formation. 

Figure 23. Bakersfield-California Isopleth Diagrams.

Chen et al. (2014) reported that at Bakersfield-California, a 50 percent reduction in 

anthropogenic VOC emissions in the Valley slightly increased the 2019 24-hour PM2.5 

design value by 0.2 μg/m3

. At this site, VOC emission reductions lead to slightly higher 

ammonium nitrate concentrations and slightly lower secondary organic carbon. On 

average, a 50 percent VOC emission reduction had no impact on PM2.5 levels in the 

Valley.

a) NOx vs. SOx b) NOx vs. VOC

c) NOx vs. Ammonia d) NOx vs. PM2.5

A-37
In addition, Chen et al. used the UCD/CIT model to study the response of PM2.5 nitrate 

to NOx and VOC emission reductions during the December 15, 2000-January 7, 2001 

winter period in the San Joaquin Valley. The authors generated isopleths diagrams for 

December 31, 2000 at Bakersfield, Fresno, and the San Joaquin Valley regional 

average, where 24-hour average PM2.5 nitrate concentrations are presented at various 

levels of NOx and VOC emission reductions. Valley-wide emission trends for 2000, 

2005, 2010 and 2015 expressed as a fraction of 2000 were superimposed on the 

isopleth diagrams (Figure 24). Results show that at each five-year interval point, 

greater reductions in PM2.5 nitrate are achieved through NOx controls rather than VOC 

controls. The authors explain this response is reasonable, because background ozone 

transported into the San Joaquin Valley from the global background is the main oxidant 

during the winter stagnation episodes in the valley. 

Figure 24. Response of 24-hour PM2.5 nitrate concentrations to NOx and VOC 

controls on December 31, 2000: (a) San Joaquin Valley average, (b) Fresno, and 

(c) Bakersfield. The solid line with dots represent estimated emissions control trend 

since 2000 and the dashed line represents projected emissions controls towards 2020. 

Dots represent emissions in 2000, 2005, 2010, and 2015. The projected 2020 

emissions are less thatn 40 percent of the 2000 emissions and are therefore not shown 

on the graph. (Source: Chen et al., 2014, Figure 5, pg. 189). 

Taken together, these air quality modeling studies indicate that in the San Joaquin 

Valley, NOx, rather than VOCs, is the limiting precursor for nitric acid and subsequent 

A-38
ammonium nitrate formation, and reductions in VOCs result in small increases in 

PM2.5.

6. SECONDARY ORGANIC AEROSOL FORMATION

VOC emissions also have the potential to contribute to secondary organic aerosols 

(SOA). While these components contribute to observed PM2.5 concentrations in the 

San Joaquin Valley to a small degree, the weight of evidence indicates that 

anthropogenic VOC is not a significant contributor to PM2.5.

SOA form when intermediate molecular weight VOCs, emitted by anthropogenic and 

biogenic sources, react and condense in the atmosphere to become aerosols. In 

addition, lighter VOCs participate in the formation of atmospheric oxidants which then 

participate in the formation of SOA. The processes of SOA formation are complex and 

have not been fully characterized. The apportionment of PM2.5 organic carbon to 

primary and secondary components is a very active area of current research. 

Using the UCD-CIT model, Chen et al. (2010) investigated the apportionment of PM2.5 

organic carbon for the 2000/2001 CRPAQS episode. From the total predicted PM2.5 

organic carbon in the urban Fresno and Bakersfield areas, six percent and four percent 

were SOA, respectively, while in the rural Angiola area, 37 percent was SOA. The 

major SOA precursors of secondary organic aerosol were long-chain alkanes followed 

by aromatic compounds. The sources of these precursors were solvent use, catalyst 

gasoline engines, wood smoke, non-catalyst gasoline engines, and other anthropogenic 

sources, in that order. 

In contrast, on an annual average basis, secondary organic aerosols derived from 

anthropogenic VOC emissions account for only one to two percent of the annual total 

PM2.5 concentrations throughout the Valley. ARB air quality modeling exercises 

conducted as part of the SJV 2008 PM2.5 Plan attainment demonstration analysis using 

the CMAQ model showed that primary PM2.5 emissions are the main contributor to 

organic aerosols and SOA contribute to only a small extent. Furthermore, as illustrated 

in Figure 25, SOA are mostly formed during the summertime, when total PM2.5 

concentrations are low, and are mainly derived from biogenic emission sources. On an 

annual average basis, SOA derived from anthropogenic VOC emissions are a small part 

of the organic aerosol concentrations (three to five percent). 

A-39
Figure 25. Daily contributions to organic aerosol concentrations in Bakersfield in 2000 

modeled with CMAQ: Primary organic aerosols (PA), secondary aerosols formed from 

biogenic VOC emissions (SB) and secondary aerosols formed from anthropogenic 

source VOC emissions (SA). Units are μg/m3.

As part of the CRPAQS study, simulations of a wintertime episode conducted using 

CMAQ-Madrid, a model with an enhanced secondary organic aerosol formation 

mechanism, also found that organic aerosol concentrations were dominated by directly 

emitted (primary) emissions. The study found that, because of the dominance of 

primary PM2.5 organic matter, a 50 percent reduction in anthropogenic VOC emissions 

has limited effects on the modeled PM2.5 organic matter (Pun, et al., 2009).

These study results show that for secondary organic aerosols, further VOC reductions 

would have very limited effectiveness in reducing PM2.5 concentrations. VOC 

reductions also result in small increases in PM2.5 overall, due to the fact that they 

increase nitrate. 

BAC

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

1

1631

4661

76

91

106121136151166181196211226241256271286301316331346361

SB

SA

PA

A-40
7. SECONDARY AMMONIUM SULFATE FORMATION 

Sulfur oxides (SOx) emitted from stationary and mobile combustion sources mostly as 

sulfur dioxide (SO2) are oxidized in the atmosphere to ultimately form sulfuric acid 

(H2SO4). Sulfuric acid then combines with ammonia to form ammonium sulfate: 

H2SO4 + 2 NH3 (NH3)2SO4

Table 3 lists SOx and ammonia winter and annual average emissions in the current 

inventory for two years (2012 and 2020). As shown in the above equation, in simple 

terms it takes one molecule of SOx and two molecules of ammonia to form one 

molecule of ammonium sulfate. However, due to differing molecular weights, one ton of 

SOx contains fewer molecules than one ton of ammonia. Therefore it is most 

appropriate to make an emissions inventory comparison after normalizing for molecular 

weight

Since one SO2 molecule weighs 64 u and one NH3 molecule weighs 17 u, one ton of 

NH3 has 3.8 times (64 u/17 u) the number of molecules as one ton of SO2. As one 

molecule of SO2 reacts with 2 molecules of NH3, dividing the SO2 emissions by 1.9 

therefore provides a common basis for comparison to the ammonia emissions. On this 

normalized comparison basis, ammonia is approximately 80 times more abundant than 

SOx. Thus, SOx emissions are the limiting precursor for ammonium sulfate formation.

Table 3. Comparison of SOx and ammonia emissions in selected years a) during the 

winter and b) on an annual average basis.

a)

Year Winter NH3

emissions (tpd)

Winter SOx 

emissions (tpd) 

Normalized SOx 

emissions (tpd)

2012 310 7.9 4.2

2020 339 7.7 4.1

b)

Year Annual NH3

emissions (tpd)

Annual SOx 

emissions (tpd) 

Normalized SOx 

emissions (tpd)

2012 330 8.1 4.3

2020 358 7.8 4.1

A-41
8. EMISSION SOURCES OF ANNUAL AVERAGE PM2.5

a. Emission inventory

Emission inventories provide emission estimates for sources of directly emitted 

(primary) PM2.5 and of each of the gaseous precursors of secondary PM2.5 (NOx,

SOx, and ammonia). Table 4 lists the main PM2.5 components and links them to their 

largest emission sources based on San Joaquin Valley emission inventory data for 

2012, the base year for the 2015 PM2.5 Plan. VOC emission are not listed, since, as 

discussed in sections 5d and 6, overall, VOC emission reductions have no effect on 

PM2.5 concentrations in the Valley. Emission sources are listed in descending order of 

magnitude.

As described in section 4c, ammonium nitrate is the main PM2.5 component, 

contributing about 40 percent of PM2.5 levels. It is formed in the atmosphere from 

reactions of NOx and ammonia emissions. Heavy-duty diesel vehicles (trucks) are the 

largest source of NOx emissions, followed by farm equipment, off-road equipment, lightduty vehicles, trains, and residential fuel combustion. Ammonia is primarily emitted 

from livestock husbandry and fertilizer application. Ammonium sulfate, formed in the air 

from reactions of SOx and ammonia emissions, contributes about 10 to 15 percent to 

PM2.5 levels. SOx is mostly emitted from the manufacturing of chemicals and glass 

related products and fuel combustion sources in oil and industrial manufacturing 

processes. Organic carbon, which contributes about 20 to 35 percent to PM2.5 levels, 

and elemental carbon, which contributes about two to five percent of PM2.5 levels, are 

directly emitted, with key sources being residential fuel combustion, diesel trucks, 

cooking, and managed burning and disposal. Geological material contributes about five 

to 15 percent of the PM2.5 mass and is directly emitted from activities generating dust, 

such as farming operations and on-road and off-road vehicle travel, as well as windblown dust. 

While emission inventories provide a broad overview of Valley wide and county level 

sources, additional methods using ambient data and source apportionment modeling 

provide supplemental information on the sources directly impacting individual monitoring 

sites. The following sections describe these analyses.

A-42
Table 4. Main emission sources of PM2.5 components.

PM2.5 Component

(percent of PM2.5)

Process Emission Sources

Ammonium nitrate

(about 40 percent) 

Formed in the 

atmosphere from the 

reactions of NOx and 

ammonia emissions 

NOx:

Heavy duty diesel vehicles account for 

approximately 50 percent of the 2012

annual NOx emissions. 

Farm equipment, off-road equipment, light, 

medium, and heavy duty gas trucks, trains, 

light duty passenger cars, and residential 

fuel combustion account for an additional 

40 percent.

Ammonia:

Livestock husbandry and fertilizer 

application account for over 90 percent of 

the 2012 annual ammonia emissions.

Ammonium sulfate

(about 5-15 percent)

Formed in the 

atmosphere from the 

reactions of SOx and 

ammonia emissions

SOx:

Manufacturing of chemicals, glass, and 

related products, fuel combustion, and 

residential wood combustion account for 

over 80 percent of the 2012 annual SOx 

emissions.

Organic Carbon

(about 20-35 percent)

Directly emitted from 

motor vehicles and 

combustion processes

Combustion PM2.5:

Residential fuel combustion, diesel trucks, 

cooking, managed burning and disposal, 

farm equipment, oil and gas production, 

electrical utilities, aircraft, and off-road 

equipment account for over 75 percent of 

the annual combustion PM2.5 emissions.

Elemental Carbon

(about 2-5 percent)

Directly emitted from 

motor vehicles and 

combustion processes

Geological

(about 5-15 percent)

Directly emitted from 

dust generating sources

Dust PM2.5:

Farming operations, fugitive windblown 

dust, paved and unpaved road dust, 

construction and demolition, and mineral 

processes account for 100 percent of the 

2012 annual dust PM2.5 emissions.

A-43
b. Source apportionment using source receptor models 

Source receptor models (also known as observational models) can be used to 

determine the relative importance of the different types of PM2.5 emission sources at 

individual monitoring sites. The Chemical Mass Balance (CMB) model statistically 

relates measured chemical species of ambient PM2.5 to the chemical species emitted 

by diverse sources. The Positive Matrix Factorization (PMF) statistical model 

distinguishes correlation patterns among measured PM2.5 species to identify sources. 

Chemical Mass Balance Modeling

Source contributions to annual average PM2.5 concentrations at Bakersfield-California 

(BAC) and Fresno –1st Street (FSF) were estimated by applying the CMB model 

version 8.2 to individual PM2.5 samples using PM2.5 source profiles developed during 

previous studies. The PM2.5 samples were from between 2008 and 2010. Per 

U.S. EPA guidance, between 2007 and 2009, the carbon collection and analysis 

method was changed to improve comparability with the rural Interagency Monitoring of 

Protected Visual Environments (IMPROVE) PM2.5 carbon data. Since the new carbon 

method started operating in May 2007 at Bakersfield and in April 2009 at Fresno, the 

CMB analysis relied on 2008-2010 data from Bakersfield and 2010 data from Fresno. 

Appendix A3 describes this CMB analysis in further detail.

Figure 26 shows the calculated contributions to ambient PM2.5, on an annual average 

basis, from sources included in the CMB model. Ammonium nitrate, the most significant 

source, contributed approximately 45 percent at both Bakersfield and Fresno-1st. 

Biomass burning, which included residential wood combustion and agricultural, 

prescribed burning, and likely also cooking, contributed nine percent at Bakersfield and 

16 percent at Fresno. Motor vehicle exhaust (diesel and gasoline combined) accounted 

for about 12 percent at both sites. Ammonium sulfate contributed approximately 

12 percent and organic carbon about eight percent at both sites. Geological (dust) 

contributed ten percent at Bakersfield and six percent at Fresno. Contributions of the 

remaining sources were minor at both sites.

A-44
Figure 26. CMB model calculated average PM2.5 source contributions at 

a) Bakersfield-California (BAC) between 2008 and 2010 and b) Fresno-1st Street (FSF)

in 2010. 

Positive Matrix Factorization

The PMF2 model was applied to the chemically speciated PM2.5 data collected at the 

Bakersfield-California and Fresno-1st Street monitoring sites. Bakersfield data from 

2008-2010 and Fresno-1st data from 2009-2010 were used. Appendix A4 describes this 

PMF analysis in further detail. The average source contributions to PM2.5 

concentrations are illustrated in Figure 27. Similar to the CMB results, ammonium

nitrate contributes the most at both sites, 41 percent at Bakersfield and 35 percent at 

Fresno-1st. At both sites, motor vehicle exhaust contributes about 12 percent and 

biomass burning (which includes residential wood combustion, agricultural burning, and 

likely also cooking) contributes approximately ten percent. Secondary ammonium 

sulfate accounts for 20 percent at Bakersfield and 27 percent at Fresno-1st. Airborne 

soil contributes ten percent at Bakersfield and seven percent at Fresno. Other sources 

are minor contributors. 

AMNIT

46.8%

AMSUL

11.9%

Sea Salt

0.5%

Motor 

Vehicle

11.8%

Biomass 

burning

9.3%

OC

7.7%

Tire and 

Brake

1.3%

Geological

10.3% Industrial

0.5%

a) BAC 2008 and 2010 Average New Carbon

AMNIT

43.2%

AMSUL Sea Salt 11.4% 0.9%

Motor 

Vehicle

13.3%

Biomass 

burning

15.7%

OC

9.2%

Tire and 

Brake

0.8%

Geological

5.6%

b) FSF 2010 Average New Carbon

A-45
Figure 27. Average source contributions estimated using PMF at a) BakersfieldCalifornia (BAC) between 2008 and 2010 and b) Fresno-1st Street (FSF) between 2009 

and 2010. 

While the absolute magnitude of the contributions estimated by the two models vary to 

some extent, taken together, the CMB and PMF source apportionment studies confirm 

the importance of secondary ammonium nitrate contributions to PM2.5 levels on an 

annual average basis and during the winter. In addition, motor vehicle exhaust and 

biomass burning, were found to be significant contributors to PM2.5 levels. Ammonium 

sulfate and geological

b) a)

A-46
9. PM2.5 AIR QUALITY PROGRESS

a. Annual PM2.5 trends 

On an annual average basis, PM2.5 air quality has improved over the last dozen years. 

Figure 28, shows annual design value(1) trends at sites in the northern (e.g., Modesto), 

central (e.g., Fresno-1st/Garland) and southern regions (e.g., Bakersfield-California). 

The Valley was nearing attainment of the annual standard through 2012, with only a few

sites recording design values over the standard. However, due to meteorological 

conditions associated with the drought PM2.5 concentrations during the 2013/2014 

winter increased, causing 2013 design values to go over the standard at more sites in 

the Valley.

Despite the increase in 2013, the Valley is still seeing overall progress. Between 2001 

and 2013, annual design values declined between 10 and 35 percent. About half of the 

sites in the Valley attain the standard in 2013, with the highest remaining levels in the 

central and southern regions, where design values are about five to 20 percent over the 

standard.

Figure 28. Trend in annual PM25 design values (2001-2013) at the BakersfieldCalifornia, Fresno-1st/Garland, and Modesto monitoring sites.

(1) The design value -- the metric used to determine compliance with the standard -- represents the 

average of three consecutive annual averages of the PM2.5 concentrations measured at a specific site 

(e.g. the 2013 PM2.5 annual design value is the average of the 2011, 2012, and 2013 annual average 

PM2.5 concentrations). If the annual design value is equal to or below 15.0 μg/m3

, the site meets the 

standard. 

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

2001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013

PM2.5 Design Value (ug/m3)

Change in Annual Design Values

Modesto

Fresno

Bakersfield-CA

15 ug/m3 Standard

Include wildfire impacts

A-47
b. 24-Hour PM2.5 trends

As illustrated in Figure 29, over the long-term, the 24-hour PM2.5 design values also 

show a downward trend. The most pronounced progress occurred between 2001 and 

2003. Extensive wildfires occurred during the summer of 2008 in Northern California. 

These wildfires impacted the 2008, 2009, and 2010 design values throughout the 

Valley, with greater impact in the northern Valley. Overall, between 2001 and 2013, the 

24-hour PM2.5 design values in the Valley have decreased between 15 and 45 percent. 

In 2013, all sites in the Valley attained the standard.

Figure 29. Trend in 24-hour PM2.5 Design Values (2001-2013) at the BakersfieldCalifornia, Fresno-Garland, and Modesto monitoring sites.

Looking at the number of days with measured PM2.5 concentrations over the 65 μg/m3

and 35 μg/m3 standards provides another way to assess PM2.5 impacts. Over the long 

term, between 1999 and 2013, the number of days exceeding the 65 μg/m3 standard 

decreased by about 60 percent at the Bakersfield-California site and by about 

80 percent at the Fresno-Garland site (Figure 30). Within the same period, the number 

of days over the 35 μg/m3 decreased by about 30 percent at the Bakersfield-California 

site and by about 40 percent at the Fresno-1st site (Figure 31). The increase in the 

number of exceedance days in 2013 compared to 2012 was due to the severe 

meteorological conditions during the winter of 2013-2014 related to the drought. The 

Valley experienced similarly severe meteorological conditions during the 1999-2000 and 

2000-2001 winters. The total number of exeedance days, however, was much higher 

during these earlier years, providing evidence that the emission reductions achieved in 

the Valley have resulted in PM2.5 air quality improvement.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

PM2.5 Design Value (ug/m3)

Change in 24-hour Design Values

Modesto

Fresno

Bakersfield-CA

65 ug/m3 Standard

Include wildfire impacts

A-48
Figure 30. Trend in measured days over the 24-hour standard of 65 μg/m3 (1999-2013) 

at the Bakersfield-California and Fresno-1st/Garland monitoring sites.

Figure 31. Trend in measured days over the 24-hour standard of 35 μg/m3 (1999-2013) 

at the Bakersfield-California and Fresno-1st/Garland monitoring sites.

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013

Number of Days

Measured Days over 24-hour PM2.5 Standard of 65 ug/m3

Fresno

Bakersfield-CA

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

199920002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013

Number of Days

Measured Days over 24-hour PM2.5 Standard of 35 ug/m3

Fresno

Bakersfield-CA

Include wildfire 

impacts

Include wildfire 

impacts

A-49
c. Trends in 24-hour, seasonal, and hourly PM2.5 

Comparing the change in the frequency distribution of 24-hour PM2.5 concentrations 

over the last dozen years provides another means of looking at air quality changes over 

the years. As illustrated in Figure 32, the fraction of days recording PM2.5 over the 

24-hour standard of 65 μg/m3 as well as the fraction of days over the 24-hour standard 

of 35 μg/m3 decreased between the three-year periods of 1999-2001 and 2011-2013 at 

the three monitoring sites shown. The frequency of days over the 65 μg/m3 standard at 

Bakersfield and at Fresno decreased from eight to two percent, and at Modesto from 

five to one percent. The frequency of days over the 35 μg/m3 standard also decreased, 

at Bakersfield from over 15 to 10 percent, at Fresno from 20 to 10 percent, and at 

Modesto from close to 15 to less 10 percent. In contrast, during these same periods,

the fraction of days recording concentrations at or below the annual standard increased 

from about 50 up to about 70 percent at Bakersfield, from 55 up to 70 percent at 

Fresno, and from about 60 up to about 75 percent at Modesto. 

Figure 32. Change in PM2.5 concentration frequency distribution between the 1999-

2001 and 2009-2013 periods at the a) Bakersfield-California, b) Fresno-1st/Garland, and 

c) Modesto monitoring sites.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

0-15 >15-25 >25-35 >35-50 >50-65 >65-90 >90

% of Samples

Concentration (ug/m3)

a) Changes in PM2.5 Concentrations at 

Bakersfield-CA

1999-2001 2011-2013

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

0-15 >15-25 >25-35 >35-50 >50-65 >65-90 >90

% of Samples

Concentration (ug/m3)

Changes in PM2.5 Concentrations at 

Fresno

1999-2001 2011-2013

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

0-15 >15-25 >25-35 >35-50 >50-65 >65-90 >90

% of Samples

Concentration (ug/m3)

c) Changes in PM2.5 Concentrations at 

Modesto

1999-2001 2011-2013

A-50
Focusing on the winters (November through February) when meteorological conditions 

were most conducive to PM2.5 formation and accumulation provides further insight into 

PM2.5 air quality progress. These years include 2000, 2002, 2007, 2011, and 2013, 

which as illustrated in Figure 31, also had the highest numbers of days measuring over 

the 24-hour PM2.5 standard. Figure 33 illustrates the decrease in the winter average 

PM2.5 concentrations for these years at the Bakersfield-California, Fresno-1st, and 

Modesto monitoring sites. Although the severe drought conditions in 2013 resulted in 

winter average PM2.5 levels that were higher than 2011, 2013 PM2.5 levels were lower 

than those in 2000, 2002, and 2007. Overall, comparing 2000 to 2013, winter average 

PM2.5 concentrations decreased by about 20 percent in Bakersfield and Modesto, and 

about 30 percent in Fresno. 

Figure 33. Changes in winter-months average (January, February, November, 

December) PM2.5 concentrations at the Bakersfield-California, Fresno-1st/Garland and 

Modesto monitoring sites among years with most PM2.5 conducive meteorology.

Progress in reducing PM2.5 levels is further evidenced by comparing daily PM2.5 

concentrations during two episodes with the most similarly severe meteorological 

conditions. The graphs in Figures 34, 35, and 36 compare PM2.5 concentrations 

measured at Bakersfield, Fresno, and Modesto, respectively, between 

November 1, 2013 and February 5, 2014 to the PM2.5 concentrations measured during 

the same three months in 2000/2001 (the CRPAQS episode). Overall, the 2013/2014 

air quality was better compared to 2000/2001 for all air quality statistics analyzed. 

Maximum 24-hour concentrations were approximately 30 to over 40 percent lower. The 

average concentrations during the three month period were 20 percent lower. The 

number of days over the 2006 24-hour standard of 35 μg/m3 decreased by about 20 to 

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

2000 2002 2007 2011 2013

Concentrations (ug/m3)

Changes in Winter Months Average PM2.5 Concentrations 

(Jan,Feb, Nov, Dec)

Modesto

Fresno

Bakersfield-CA

A-51
30 percent. Even more significant was the 25 to 70 percent decline in the number of 

days with concentrations over the 65 μg/m3 standard.

Figure 34. Comparison of the 2013/2014 PM2.5 episode to the CRPAQS episode of 

2000/2001 at the Bakersfield-California monitoring site.

Figure 35. Comparison of the 2013/2014 PM2.5 episode to the CRPAQS episode of 

2000/2001 at the Fresno 1st/Garland monitoring site.

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

1-Nov8-Nov

15-Nov22-Nov29-Nov

6-Dec

13-Dec20-Dec27-Dec

3-Jan

10-Jan17-Jan24-Jan31-Jan

Concentrations (ug/m3)

2013/2014 Winter vs. CRPAQS - Bakersfield

2013

CRPAQS

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

1-Nov8-Nov

15-Nov22-Nov29-Nov

6-Dec

13-Dec20-Dec27-Dec

3-Jan

10-Jan17-Jan24-Jan31-Jan

Concentrations (ug/m3)

2013/2014 Winter vs. CRPAQS - Fresno

2013

CRPAQS

A-52
Figure 36. Comparison of the 2013/2014 PM2.5 episode to the CRPAQS episode of 

2000/2001 at the Modesto monitoring site.

Progress in reducing PM2.5 levels is further corroborated by comparing changes in 

monthly average PM2.5 concentrations between 1999-2001 and 2011-2013 (Figure 37). 

The overall PM2.5 seasonal pattern has not changed; however the average monthly 

concentrations have decreased. The most significant improvements in PM2.5 have 

been achieved during the winter months.

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

2-Nov

11-Nov20-Nov26-Nov

5-Dec

14-Dec17-Dec23-Dec26-Dec29-Dec

5-Jan

10-Jan15-Jan20-Jan28-Jan

1-Feb

Concentrations (ug/m3)

2013/2014 Winter vs. CRPAQS - Modesto

2013

CRPAQS

A-53
Figure 37. Changes in PM2.5 monthly concentrations between the 1999-2001 and 

2011-2013 three-year periods at the a) Bakersfield-California, b) Fresno-1st/Garland, 

and c) Modesto monitoring sites.

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Concentrations (ug/m3)

Month

b) Changes in PM2.5 Seasonal Pattern

Fresno

1999-2001 2011-2013

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Concentrations (ug/m3)

Month

a) Changes in PM2.5 Seasonal Pattern

Bakersfield-California

1999-2001 2011-2013

0

10

20

30

40

50

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Concentrations (ug/m3)

Month

c) Changes in PM2.5 Seasonal Pattern

Modesto

1999-2001 2011-2013

A-54
Comparing changes in PM2.5 diurnal patterns offers further insight. Figure 38

illustrates changes in the three-year averages of hourly PM2.5 concentrations recorded 

during November-February between 2001-2003 and 2011-2013 at a) BakersfieldCalifornia, b) Fresno-1st/Garland, and c) Modesto. The overall diurnal patterns have not 

changed, yet hourly concentrations have decreased throughout the day. Peak daytime

concentrations decreased approximately 25 to 30 percent and peak nighttime

concentrations decreased approximately 20 to 40 percent. 

Figure 38. Changes in the average November-February PM2.5 hourly concentrations 

between the 2001-2003 and 2011-2013 three-year periods at the a) BakersfieldCalifornia, b) Fresno-1st, and c) Modesto monitoring sites. 

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

0 4 8 12 16 20

PM2.5 Concentration (ug/m3)

Time-of-day

Changes in PM2.5 Diurnal Variation 

(Nov - Feb) at Bakersfield-California

2001-2003 2011-2013

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

0 4 8 12 16 20

PM2.5 Concentration (ug/m3)

Time-of-day

Changes in PM2.5 Diurnal Variation

(Nov - Feb) at Fresno-1st./Garland

2001-2003 2011-2013

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

0 4 8 12 16 20

PM2.5 Concentration (ug/m3)

Time-of-day

Changes in PM2.5 Diurnal Variation

(Nov - Feb) at Modesto

2001-2003 2011-2013

A-55
d. Chemical composition trends

As previously discussed, PM2.5 concentrations measured at monitoring sites in the 

Valley have decreased from the 1999-2001 to the 2009-2012 three-year periods at 

Bakersfield and to the 2011-2013 period at Fresno and Modesto. Trends in individual 

PM2.5 chemical components, as well as emission inventory trends were evaluated to 

highlight the main chemical components leading to the progress in PM2.5 air quality and 

to evaluate the response to State and District control programs.

Speciation monitors in the SJV collect data on PM2.5 chemical composition. 

Figures 39, 40, and 41 illustrate the three-year average trends in the individual PM2.5 

components at Bakersfield, Fresno, and Modesto. Between 2007 and 2009, the carbon 

collection and analysis method was changed to improve comparability with the rural 

IMPROVE PM2.5 carbon data. Thus, for trend analyses, the total carbon compounds

mass was estimated as the difference between the measured PM2.5 mass and the 

inorganic components mass.

Ammonium nitrate, ammonium sulfate, and carbon compounds are the major 

constituents of PM2.5 levels. On an annual average basis, concentrations of these key 

constituents have all shown significant decreases. Ammonium nitrate concentrations in 

the Valley declined about 25 to 35 percent between 2004 (2002-20014 average) and 

2013 (2011-2013 average). During the same time-frame, concentrations of ammonium

sulfate declined about 20 to 36 percent and other, including organic and elemental 

carbon declined about approximately 15 percent. The most significant declines 

occurred between 2004 and 2005, and again between 2008 and 2011. 

Figure 39. Trends in three-year average PM2.5 chemical components at Bakersfield. 

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Concentrations (ug/m3)

Trends in PM2.5 Chemical Components at Bakersfield

Ammonium Nitrate

Ammonium Sulfate

Geological

Elements

Carbon Compounds

A-56
Figure 40. Trends in three-year average PM2.5 chemical components at Fresno. 

Figure 41. Trends in three-year average PM2.5 chemical components at Modesto. 

The 2015 SJV PM2.5 Plan’s Appendix A describes further analyses on PM2.5 air quality 

trends.

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Concentrations (ug/m3)

Trends in PM2.5 Chemical Components at Fresno

Ammonium Nitrate

Ammonium Sulfate

Geological

Carbon Compounds

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Concentrations (ug/m3)

Trends in PM2.5 Chemical Components at Modesto

Ammonium Nitrate

Ammonium Sulfate

Geological

Elements

Carbon Compounds

A-57
e. Trends in chemical markers of source types

Selected compounds measured in the atmosphere can serve as chemical markers for 

specific sources. Since 2007, ARB conducts measurements of levoglucosan, a 

chemical marker of wood smoke, at the Modesto and Visalia monitoring sites. Figure 42

illustrates the trends in winter time levoglucosan concentrations at these two sites. The 

data are presented as three-year averages (e.g., the 2009 concentration represents the 

2007-2009 average concentration). Between 2009 and 2013, levoglucosan decreased 

by about ten percent at Visalia, with steady decrease until 2012 and a marked increase 

in 2013. On the other hand, levoglucosan levels at Modesto stayed approximately 

constant between 2009 and 2012 and increased by approximately 35 percent in 2013. 

The severe drought conditions led to the higher levoglucosan concentrations recorded

in 2013. The District Rule 4901, which restricts residential wood-burning on days when 

high concentrations of PM2.5 are predicted, as well as the District’s stringent smoke 

management program under which agricultural burning is prohibited on those same 

days, led to the observed reductions in levoglusoan. 

Figure 42. Trends in three-year winter average levoglucosan levels at Modesto and 

Visalia.

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Levoglucosan (μg/m3)

Trends in Winter Average Levoglucosan Concentrations 

Modesto

Visalia

A-58
f. Emission inventory trends

Reductions in PM2.5, NOx and SOx emissions are key to effectively reducing PM2.5

concentrations. Figure 43 illustrates annual emission trends in the San Joaquin Valley 

air basin from 2000 through 2013(1) for PM2.5 and the two key precursors.

• NOx emissions have decreased by 284 tons per day (tpd) or 47 percent.

Major reductions occurred in emissions from heavy-duty diesel trucks, stationary 

combustion sources, and other mobile sources (e.g., farm and off-road 

equipment, trains)

• Direct PM2.5 emissions decreased by 27 tpd or about 30 percent.

Major reductions occurred in emissions from residential wood combustion, 

mobile sources, such as heavy-duty diesel trucks and off-road equipment, and 

entrained dust.

• SOx decreased by 15 tpd or about 65 percent. 

Major reductions occurred in emissions from stationary fuel combustion sources 

and industrial processes.

The combined downward trends in PM2.5 components and emissions of PM2.5, NOx, 

and SOx indicate that the ongoing control program has had substantial benefits in 

improving air quality in the SJV and that further emission reductions in the future are 

expected to provide continuing progress towards attaining the annual PM2.5 standard. 

Figure 43. PM2.5 and PM2.5 precursor annual emission trends in the San Joaquin 

Valley.

(1) Historical 2000-2011 emissions are from the 2016 Ozone SIP baseline emission inventory. 

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

20002001200220032004200520062007200820092010201120122013

Emissions (tond per day)

Trend in SJV Annual Emissions 

NOx

PM2.5

SOx

A-59
10.LINKING AIR QUALITY TRENDS TO EMISSION REDUCTIONS

a. NOx control

Programs aimed at reducing NOx emissions have played an important role in reducing 

nitrate concentrations and, consequently, overall PM2.5 concentrations in the Valley. 

As discussed in section 5, previous studies have identified NOx as the limiting precursor 

for ammonium nitrate formation. As a result, NOx emissions and PM2.5 nitrate levels 

track each other over the years. Trends in estimated NOx emissions, as well as 

monitored ambient concentrations, are compared with trends in measured PM2.5 nitrate 

concentrations. As illustrated in Figure 44, between 2004 and 2012, Valley-wide NOx 

emissions decreased by about 41 percent, with a commensurate reduction of about 

37 percent in PM2.5 nitrate concentrations at the Bakersfield and Fresno sites. 

Furthermore, the reductions in NOx emissions were also reflected in the corresponding 

reduction in the ambient gaseous NOx concentrations. Figures 45 and 46 show a 

strong correlation between trends in PM2.5 nitrate concentrations and ambient NOx 

concentrations at the Bakersfield and Fresno sites. Between 2004 and 2012, 

concentrations of PM2.5 nitrate decreased about 37 percent and ambient NOx 

decreased between 35 percent and 40 percent. 

Figure 44. Comparison between trends in Valley wide annual average NOx emission 

and PM2.5 nitrate concentrations at Bakersfield and Fresno. Concentrations are

presented as three-year averages (e.g., 2004 represents the average of 2002-2004).

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

NOx Emissions (tpd)

PM2.5 Nitrate (μg/m3)

Three-Year Average PM2.5 Nitrate at Bakersield and 

Fresno compared to SJV NOx emissions

NOx Emissions

BAC NO3-

FSF NO3-

A-60
Figure 45. Comparison of trends in annual average trends in PM2.5 nitrate and NOx 

concentrations in Bakersfield. Concentrations are presented as three-year averages.

Figure 46. Comparison of trends in annual average PM2.5 nitrate and NOx 

concentrations in Fresno. Concentrations are presented as three-year averages.

0

1

2

3

4

5

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

2004200520062007200820092010201120122013

NOx (pphm)

PM2.5 Nitrate (ug/m3)

Three-year Average Concentrations

of PM2.5 Nitrate and NOx at Bakersfield

NO3-

NOx

0

1

2

3

4

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

2004200520062007200820092010201120122013

NOx (pphm)

PM2.5 Nitrate (ug/m3)

Three-year Average Concentrations

of PM2.5 Nitrate and NOx at Fresno

NO3-

NOx

A-61
b. Residential wood combustion controls 

Programs geared at reducing PM2.5 emissions from combustion sources have played 

an important role in reducing overall PM2.5 concentrations in Valley. As illustrated in 

Figure 47, between 2004 and 2012, Valley-wide combustion PM2.5 emissions 

decreased by approximately 30 percent with a concomitant 15 percent reduction in 

measured PM2.5 carbon compounds at the Bakersfield site and 20 percent reduction at 

the Fresno site. The most significant declines in PM2.5 carbon compounds occurred 

between 2004 and 2005 and again between 2008 and 2012. The severe drought 

conditions in 2013 caused the observed increase in PM2.5 carbon compounds at 

Fresno.

Figure 47: Comparison between trends in Valley wide annual average Combustion 

PM2.5 emissions and concentrations of PM2.5 carbon compounds at Bakersfield and 

Fresno. Concentrations are presented as three-year averages (e.g., 2004 represents 

the 2002-2004 average).

Reductions in combustion sources include the implementation of District Rule 4901, 

which restricts residential wood-burning on days when high concentrations of PM2.5 are 

predicted. In addition, as part of the District’s stringent smoke management program, 

agricultural burning is prohibited on those same days. Through a series of Rule 4901 

amendments, the PM2.5 threshold for calling no-burn days was established in 2003 at 

65 μg/m3 and subsequently tightened to 30 μg/m3 in 2008. Before the 2014/2015 winter, 

the District lowered the no-burn threshold to 20 μg/m3 for most wood burning devices. 

Only the cleanest, registered, U.S. EPA certified devices are allowed to continue 

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Combustion PM2.5 Emissions (tpd)

Concentrations (ug/m3)

Three-Year Average PM2.5 Carbon Compounds at Bakersfield 

and Fresno Compared to SJV Combustion PM2.5 Emissions

Combustion

PM2.5

Emissions

Bakersfield

Carbon

Compounds

Fresno Carbon

Compounds

A-62
burning, up to a threshold of 65 μg/m3

. A grant program for the change-out of old dirty 

devices with cleaner woodstoves complements the no-burn program. 

The District staff developed a statistical model to quantify PM2.5 reductions and 

evaluate air quality improvements attributable to the 2003 and 2008 amendments to 

Rule 4901. The District used generalized linear model techniques with logarithmic 

transformations based on the relationships between meteorology and PM2.5 

concentrations that existed prior to the 2003 Rule 4901 amendments. Results from this 

model were used to evaluate rule effectiveness through the winter of 2013-2014. 

Using daily and hourly observed PM2.5 concentrations as dependent variables with 

meteorological parameters such as wind speed, temperature, and stability as 

independent variables, statistical relationships of PM2.5 to meteorology were developed 

for the winters of 2001-2002 and 2002-2003. These statistical relationships made it 

possible to predict daily and evening PM2.5 levels in the period following the 2003 and 

2008 rule amendments, which were then compared to observed PM2.5 concentrations 

to evaluate air quality improvements. A consistent pattern of model-predicted values 

being higher than what was actually observed provides statistical evidence that a 

control measure, e.g., wood-burning curtailments, was responsible for the changes in 

PM2.5 concentrations.

This statistical modeling indicates that significant improvement has been made after the 

2003 and 2008 Rule 4901 amendments in Modesto, Fresno and Bakersfield

(Figure 52). To date, there has been an average improvement of 16 μg/m3 (40%) in the 

24-hour average PM2.5 level since the 2003 and 2008 amendments. This improvement 

is exemplified in PM2.5 concentrations measured during the evening hours of 8:00 p.m. 

to 12:00 a.m., where the average concentrations have improved by 28 μg/m3 (45%) 

over the same time period. The District’s analysis is further described in the End-ofSeason Report on the 2013-2014 Wood-Burning Season 

(http://www.valleyair.org/Board_meetings/GB/agenda_minutes/Agenda/2014/April/final/07.pdf)

A-63
Figure 52: Change in 24-hour and night-time (8 pm to 12 am) PM2.5 concentrations by 

Rule period in a) Modesto, b) Fresno, c) Bakersfield

a) Modesto

b) Fresno

c) Bakersfield.

A-64
11.MODELED ATTAINMENT DEMONSTRATION

The U.S. EPA approved air quality modeling for the 2008 PM2.5 SIP provided the basis 

to predict future PM2.5 concentrations at each monitoring site in the San Joaquin 

Valley. The attainment demonstration uses the fundamental chemistry and associated 

response of different PM2.5 constituents to emission controls reflected in the modeling in 

the 2008 PM2.5 SIP. This modeling science is coupled with air quality data reflecting 

2013 design values and PM2.5 chemical composition, along with emission reductions 

expected in 2020 (for the annual standard demonstration) and in 2018 (for the 24-hour 

demonstration). 

The implementation of new reductions from California’s on-going emission control 

programs will provide the majority of the emission reductions needed to attain the 

annual PM2.5 standard throughout the San Joaquin Valley in 2020. Between 2012, the 

base year used in the photochemical modeling attainment demonstration and 2020, 

implementation of these control programs will reduce NOx emissions by 38 percent. 

The NOx reductions result from ongoing implementation of both new vehicle standards 

for passenger and heavy-duty diesel vehicles and equipment, as well as rules 

accelerating the turnover of legacy diesel fleets. Implementation of stringent 

requirements for new off-road engines and in-use off road equipment lead to further 

NOx reductions, along with District rules addressing stationary source NOx emissions. 

The weight of evidence analysis has demonstrated that prior reductions in NOx have 

resulted in commensurate reductions in ambient concentrations of nitrate. 

In addition, directly emitted PM2.5 emissions in aggregate are decreasing by 

eight percent. PM2.5 emission reductions result from ongoing implementation of diesel 

on- and off-road equipment measures as well as the District’s recently strengthened rule 

for wood-burning fireplaces and heaters. These measures, along with additional 

reductions from enhancements to the District’s commercial charbroiling rule slated for 

adoption in 2016 provide the necessary control strategy to bring the entire Valley into 

attainment of the 24-hour standard by 2018, and the annual standard by 2020.

Tables 5 and 6 list the Valley-wide emissions levels used in the annual and 24-hour 

PM2.5 attainment demonstrations, respectively. Baseline emission levels reflect the 

implementation of adopted ARB and District control measures. Three additional District 

rules that were adopted subsequent to the preparation of the baseline inventory plus 

one new commitment provide the remaining emissions reductions needed to reach the 

attainment targets. 

A-65
Table 5. Annual average attainment level emissions in tons per day (tpd)

Emission Inventory

2020 Annual Average Emissions 

(tpd)

PM2.5 NOx SOx

Baseline Emissions 62.8 206.9 7.9

Emission Reductions from District Control 

Measures

• Rule 4901 Wood Burning Fireplaces and 

Wood Burning Heaters (Adopted)

1.6 0.0 0.0

• Rule 4905 Natural Gas-Fired, Fan-Type 

Residential Central Furnaces (Adopted)

0.0 0.4 0.0

• Rule 4308 Boilers, Steam Generators, and 

Process Heaters 0.075 to <2 MMBtu/hr

(Adopted)

0.0 0.0 0.0

• Rule 4692 Commercial Charbroiling

(Commitment)

0.4 0.0 0.0

Attainment Emission Levels 60.8 206.5 7.9

Table 6. Winter average attainment level emissions in tpd

Emission Inventory

2018 Winter Average Emissions 

(tpd)

PM2.5 NOx SOx

Baseline Emissions 57.7 213.9 7.6

Emission Reductions from District Control 

Measures

• Rule 4901 Wood Burning Fireplaces and 

Wood Burning Heaters (Adopted)

2.9 0.0 0.0

• Rule 4905 Natural Gas-Fired, Fan-Type 

Residential Central Furnaces (Adopted)

0.0 0.2 0.0

• Rule 4308 Boilers, Steam Generators, and 

Process Heaters 0.075 to <2 MMBtu/hr

(Adopted)

0.0 0.0 0.0

• Rule 4692 Commercial Charbroiling

(Commitment)

0.4 0.0 0.0

Attainment Emission Levels 54.4 213.7 7.6

A-66
Table 7 lists the 2013 annual design values along with projected 2020 annual design 

values ranging from 12.5 μg/m3 to 15.0 μg/m3

, demonstrating the Valley will attain the 

annual standard in 2020. 

Table 7. Modeled 2020 Annual PM2.5 Design Values

Monitoring Site 2013 Annual Design 

Value (μg/m3)

2020 Annual Design 

Value (μg/m3)

Bakersfield - California Street 16.4 13.7

Bakersfield - 410 E Planz 17.0 14.3

Clovis - N Villa Avenue 16.4 13.3

Fresno - 1st Street/Garland 15.4 12.5

Fresno - Hamilton and Winery 14.7 12.0

Hanford-S Irwin Street 17.0 13.9

Madera 18.1 15.0

Manteca-530 Fishback Rd 10.2 8.7

Merced - 2334 M Street 11.1 9.2

Merced – S Coffee Ave 13.3 11.0

Modesto - 14th Street 13.6 11.5

Stockton - Hazelton Street 13.8 12.0

Tranquility 7.9 6.6

Turlock-S Minaret Street 15.7 13.2

Visalia - N Church Street 16.6 13.5

Although 2013 24-hour design values show the entire Valley to be in attainment for the 

standard, the modeling analysis was also conducted for this standard. As previously 

described, the analysis includes new emission reductions in each year between now 

and 2018 from implementation of a combination of adopted ARB and District programs. 

As shown on Table 8, modeling results indicate these control programs will result in 

2018 24-hour design values ranging between 24 μg/m3 and 52 μg/m3. For sites with 

2013 design values over 60 μg/m3, the modeled 2018 design values range between 

46 μg/m3 and 52 μg/m3 (71-80 percent of the standard). 

A-67
Table 8. Modeled 2018 24-hour PM2.5 Design Values

Monitoring Site 2013 Annual Design 

Value (μg/m3)

2020 Annual Design 

Value (μg/m3)

Bakersfield - California Street 16.4 13.7

Bakersfield - 410 E Planz 17.0 14.3

Clovis - N Villa Avenue 16.4 13.3

Fresno - 1st Street/Garland 15.4 12.5

Fresno - Hamilton and Winery 14.7 12.0

Hanford-S Irwin Street 17.0 13.9

Madera 18.1 15.0

Manteca-530 Fishback Rd 10.2 8.7

Merced - 2334 M Street 11.1 9.2

Merced – S Coffee Ave 13.3 11.0

Modesto - 14th Street 13.6 11.5

Stockton - Hazelton Street 13.8 12.0

Tranquility 7.9 6.6

Turlock-S Minaret Street 15.7 13.2

Visalia - N Church Street 16.6 13.5

a. Impact of preliminary 2014 PM2.5 data

The drought-related meteorological conditions that affected PM2.5 concentrations in the 

San Joaquin Valley during 2013 continued into 2014. Although complete data for 2014 

is not yet available, this section provides a preliminary assessment of 2014 air quality 

data in relation to the attainment demonstration. 

Despite the ongoing persistence of the drought, air quality conditions in 2014 generally 

improved at most locations, particularly in the northern and central portions of the 

Valley. This is an indication that although drought conditions are continuing, progress is 

resuming as a result of ongoing emission reductions. However, because 2014 design 

values will reflect the impact of multiple years of drought, a comparison to the 2013 

design values used in the attainment demonstration is expected to be mixed, with some 

locations recording design values that are slightly lower, and other locations recording 

design values that are slightly higher. Based on an assessment of the PM2.5 levels 

predicted for 2020 as well as ongoing trends and analyses, consideration of 2014 

design values is expected to remain consistent with the current attainment 

demonstration. However, ARB and the District will continue to monitor the impacts of 

the drought and its relationship to future PM2.5 attainment needs.

A-68
12. SUMMARY

Consideration of the entirety of information presented in the weight of evidence provides 

a consistent assessment that supports the modeled attainment date of 2018 for the 24-

hour PM2.5 standard and 2020 for the annual PM2.5 standard. The substantial 

continuing reductions that will result from implementation of the ongoing control 

program, coupled with measures addressing residential wood burning and cooking, are 

consistent with the results predicted in the modeled attainment demonstration. This 

weight of evidence assessment is based upon the following factors:

• Over the last 12 years progress has occurred in reducing annual PM2.5 

concentrations. The annual design value has decreased by over 30 to 35 percent. 

• The 24-hour design value has decreased by 30 to 45 percent, while the number of 

exceedances has decreased by 60 to 80 percent.

• The attainment demonstration accounts for drought related meteorological 

conditions that caused the 2013 annual and 24-hour PM2.5 design values to be 

higher than in previous years. 

• Both receptor and photochemical grid based modeling have identified residential 

wood burning as a significant contributor to wintertime PM2.5 concentrations. The 

reductions in the carbonaceous component of PM2.5 that have occurred can be 

linked to implementation of the District’s residential wood burning curtailment 

program.

• Evaluation of emissions inventory data, monitoring studies, and photochemical 

modeling indicate that controlling NOx emissions is the most effective strategy to 

reduce ammonium nitrate concentrations. 

• Evaluation of monitoring studies and photochemical modeling indicates that 

controlling VOCs is not an effective strategy to reduce nitrate concentrations. 

• The decrease in ammonium nitrate concentrations observed at Valley monitoring 

sites tracks concurrent reductions in NOx emissions as well as trends in gaseous 

NOx concentrations. 

• Substantial NOx and PM2.5 emission reductions will occur between 2012 and 2020

due to the implementation of on-going measures and additional new measures. As 

a result of these programs, NOx emissions will decrease by 38 percent, and PM2.5 

emissions by nearly eight percent.

• The modeled attainment demonstration predicts that all sites in the Valley will attain

the annual standard by 2020. This modeling assessment is consistent with the 

A-69
benefits seen from previous reductions in the sources and pollutants being 

addressed as part of the attainment strategy.

• The attainment demonstration shows that in 2018 the 24-hour PM2.5 standard will 

be attained.

A-70
REFERENCES 

Blanchard, C.L., Roth, P.M., Tanenbaum, S.J., Ziman, S.D., Seinfeld, J.H., 2000, The 

use of ambient measurements to identify which precursor species limit aerosol nitrate 

formation, J. Air & Waste Management Association, 50: 2073-2084. 

Chen, J., Ying, Q., and Kleeman, M.J., 2010, Source apportionment of wintertime 

secondary organic aerosol during the California regional PM10/PM2.5 air quality study, 

Atmospheric Environment, 44(10), 1331-1340.

Chen,J., Lu, J., Avise, J.C., DaMassa, J.A., Kleeman, M.J., Kaduwela, A.P., 2014, 

Seasonal Modeling of PM2.5 in California’s San Joaquin Valley, Atmospheric 

Environment, 92, 182-190.

Chow, J.C.; Chen, L.-W.A.; Lowenthal, D.H.; Doraiswamy, P.; Park, K.; Kohl, S.D.; 

Trimble, D.L.; Watson, J.G., 2005, California Regional PM10/PM2.5 Air Quality Study 

(CRPAQS) - Initial data analysis of field program measurements. Report Number 2497; 

prepared by Desert Research Institute, Reno, NV, for California Air Resources Board, 

Sacramento, CA.

Jacob, D.J., Crawford, J.H., Maring, H., Clarke, A.D., Dibb, J.E., Emmons, L.K., Ferrare, 

R.A., Hostetler, C.A., Russell, P.B., Singh, H.B., Thompson, A.M., Shaw, G.E., 

McCauley, E., Pederson, J.R., and Fisher, J.A., 2010, The Arctic Research of the 

Composition of the Troposphere from Aircraft and Satellites (ARCTAS) Mission: 

Design, Execution, and First Results, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 10(11), 

5191-5212.

Kleeman, M.J., Ying, Q., and Kaduwela, A., Control strategies for the reduction of 

airborne particulate nitrate in California's San Joaquin Valley, Atmospheric Environment, 

2005, 39, 5325-5341. 

Lurmann, F.W., Brown, S.G., McCarthy, M.C., and Roberts, P.T., December 2006, 

Processes Influencing Secondary Aerosol Formation in the San Joaquin Valley during 

Winter, Journal of Air and Waste Management Association, 56, 1679-1693.

Liang, J., Gürer, K., Allen, P.D., Zhang, K.M., Ying, Q., Kleeman, M., Wexler, A., and 

Kaduwela, A.,2006, A photochemical model investigation of an extended winter PM 

episode observed in Central California: Model Performance Evaluation, Proceedings of 

the 5th Annual CMAQ Models-3 User’s Conference, Chapel Hill, NC.

Livingstone, P.L., et. al., 2009, Simulating PM concentrations during a winter episode in 

a subtropical valley: Sensitivity simulations and evaluation methods, Atmospheric 

Environment, 43, 5971-5977.

A-71
MacDonald, C.P.; McCarthy, M.C.; Dye, T.S.; Wheeler, N.J.M.; Hafner, H.R.; Roberts, 

P.T., 2006, Transport and dispersion during wintertime particulate matter episodes in 

the San Joaquin Valley, California. J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 56(7):961-976.

Meng, Z., Dabdub, D., and Seinfeld, J.H., July 1997, Chemical coupling between 

atmospheric ozone and particulate matter, Science, 

DOI:10.1126/science.277.5322.116, 116-119. 

Pun, B.K., and Seigneur, C., 1998, Conceptual model of particulate matter pollution in 

the California San Joaquin Valley, prepared for Pacific Gas & Electric, Document 

CP045-1-98.

Pun, B.K., and Seigneur, C.,2001, Sensitivity of particulate matter nitrate formation to 

precursor emissions in the California San Joaquin Valley, Environmental Science and 

Technology, 35, 2979-2987.

Pun, B.K., 2004, CRPAQS Task 2.7 when and where does high O3 correspond to high 

PM2.5? How much PM2.5 corresponds to photochemical end products? prepared for 

the San Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.

Pun, B.K., Balmori R.T.F, and Seigneur, C., 2009, Modeling wintertime particulate 

matter formation in Central California, Atmospheric Environment, 43, 402-409.

Stockwell, W.R., Watson, J.G., Robinson, N.F., Steiner, W., and Sylte, W.W., 2000, The 

ammonium nitrate particle equivalent of NOx emissions for wintertime conditions in 

Central California’s San Joaquin Valley, Atmospheric Environment, 34, 4711-4717.

U.S. EPA, 2007, Guidance on the Use of Models and Other Analyses for Demonstrating 

Attainment of Air Quality Goals for Ozone, PM2.5, and Regional Haze, EPA-454/B07-

002.

Ying, Q., Lu, J., Kaduwela, A., and Kleeman, M., 2008, Modeling air quality during the 

California Regional PM10/PM2.5 Air Quality Study (CPRAQS) using the UCD/CIT Source 

Oriented Air Quality Model - Part II. Regional source apportionment of primary airborne 

particulate matter, Atmospheric Environment, 42(39), 8967-8978.

Ying, Q., Kleeman, M., 2009, Regional contribution to airborne particulate matter in 

central California during a severe pollution episode. Atmos. Environ., 43, 1218-1228.

Ying, Q., Lu, J., and Kleeman, M., 2009, Modeling air quality during the California 

Regional PM10/PM2.5 Air Quality Study (CRPAQS) using the UCD/CIT source-oriented 

air quality model – Part III. Regional source apportionment of secondary and total 

airborne particulate matter, Atmospheric Environment, 43, 419-430.

West, J.J., Ansari, A.S., and Pandis, S.N., 1999, Marginal PM2.5: Nonlinear aerosol 

mass response to sulfate reductions in the Eastern United States, J. Air & Waste 

Manage. Assoc., 49, 1415-1424.

A-72
SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY PM2.5 WEIGHT OF EVIDENCE ANALYSIS

APPENDIX A1

CALIFORNIA REGIONAL PM10/PM2.5 AIR QUALITY STUDY

PUBLICATIONS
CALIFORNIA REGIONAL PM10/PM2.5 AIR QUALITY STUDY 

PUBLICATIONS

1. Roth, P. M. et al., 1993, “A Proposed PM-10 Program for the San Joaquin Valley”, prepared by 

Envair for the San Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.

2. Gray, H.A. et al. 1995, “San Joaquin Valley Regional PM10 Study Technical Support Study 5A: 

Characterizing Micrometeorological Phenomena: Mixing and Diffusion in Low Wind 

Speed Stable Conditions”, prepared by Systems Applications International for the San 

Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency. 

3. Gillies, J. et al., 1995, “Literature Review Plan for the San Joaquin Valley Regional Particulate 

Study Technical Support Study No. 5: Particle Resuspension”, prepared by the Desert 

Research Institute for the San Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.

4. Gillies, J. et al., 1995, “Resuspension of Particles by the Wind: A Literature Review for the San 

Joaquin Valley Regional Particulate Study Technical Support Study No. 5: Particle 

Resuspension”, prepared by the Desert Research Institute for the San Joaquin 

Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.

5. Gillies, J. et al., 1996, “Resuspension of Particles by the Wind: Research Initiatives for California 

Regional Particulate Study Technical Support Study No. 5: Particle Resuspension”, 

prepared by the Desert Research Institute for the San Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution 

Study Agency.

6. Gillies, J. et al., 1996, “Resuspension of Particles by the Wind: Modeling, Data Analysis Initiatives

for California Regional Particulate Study Technical Support Study No. 5: Particle 

Resuspension”, prepared by the Desert Research Institute for the San Joaquin 

Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.

7. Hagan, C. et al., 1996, “California Regional PM10 Air Quality Study: Emissions Modeling Plan”, 

prepared by Envair for the San Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.

8. Roth, P. M. et al., 1996, “Revisions to Cost Estimates for the Central California Fine Particle 

Study”, prepared by Envair for the San Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.

9. Watson, J. et al., 1996, “Data Analysis Activities for the 1995 Integrated Monitoring Study (IMS95) 

of the California Regional Particulate Matter Study (CRPAQS)”, prepared by Desert 

Research Institute for the San Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.

10. Kumar, N. et al., 1996, “User’s Guide to the UAM-AERO Model”, prepared by Sonoma Technology 

Inc. for the San Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.

11. Kumar, N. et al., 1996, “User’s Guide to the Speciated Rollback Model for Particulate Matter”, 

prepared by Sonoma Technology Inc. for the San Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution 

Study Agency.

A1-1
12. Lurmann, F. et al., 1996, “PM10 Air Quality Models for Application in the San Joaquin Valley 

PM10 SIP”, prepared by Sonoma Technology, Inc. for the San Joaquin Valleywide Air 

Pollution Study Agency.

13. Lehrman, D. E. et al., 1996, “SARMAP II Design: Analysis of the San Joaquin Valley 

Meteorological Environment During High PM10 Loading”, prepared by Technical &

Business Systems, Inc. for the San Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.

14. Rogge, W., 1996, “Feasibility of Using Organic Tracers for Tracking the Fate of Primary and 

Secondary Aerosols from Combustion Sources”, prepared by Florida International 

University for the San Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.

15. Chinkin, L. R. et al., 1996, “Final Workplan for Evaluation and Improvement of Methods for 

Determining Ammonia Emissions in the San Joaquin Valley Technical Support Study 

5”, prepared by Sonoma Technology, Inc. for the San Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution 

Study Agency.

16. Chinkin, L. R., 1996, “CRPAQS TSS15: Task 3, Initial Ammonia Inventory for the San Joaquin 

Valley”, prepared by Sonoma Technology, Inc. for the San Joaquin Valleywide Air 

Pollution Study Agency.

17. Chinkin, L. R. et al., 1996, “Review of Current Methodologies for Estimating Ammonia Emissions”, 

prepared by Sonoma Technology, Inc. for the San Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution 

Study Agency.

18. Watson, J. G. et al., 1996, “Final Study Plan for: Effectiveness Demonstration of Fugitive Dust 

Control Methods for Public Unpaved Roads and Unpaved Shoulders on Paved Roads”, 

prepared by the Desert Research Institute for the San Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution 

Study Agency.

19. Watson, J. G. et al., 1996, “Final Report: Effectiveness Demonstration of Fugitive Dust Control 

Methods for Public Unpaved Roads and Unpaved Shoulders on Paved Roads”, 

prepared by Desert Research Institute for the San Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution 

Study Agency.

20. Solomon, P.A. et al., 1996, “1995 Integrated Monitoring Study: Objectives and Design”, presented 

at the 1996 U.S. EPA/A&WMA International Symposium on Measurement of Toxic 

and Related Air Pollutants, Research Triangle Park, NC.

21. Magliano, K.L. et al., 1996, “1995 Integrated Monitoring Study: Temporal Variability of Particulate 

Matter - Preliminary Results”, presented at the 1996 U.S. EPA/A&WMA International 

Symposium on Measurement of Toxic and Related Air Pollutants, Research Triangle 

Park, NC.

22. Solomon, P.A. et al., 1996, “1995 Integrated Monitoring Study: Spatial and Temporal Variability of 

PM10 During the Fall Saturation Study - Preliminary Results”, presented at the 1996 

U.S. EPA/A&WMA International Symposium on Measurement of Toxic and Related Air 

Pollutants, Research Triangle Park, NC.

23. Coe, D. et al., 1996, “Emission Activity Measurement During the Fall andd Winter IMS95 

Components - Preliminary Results”, presented at the 1996 U.S. EPA/A&WMA 

A1-2
International Symposium on Measurement of Toxic and Related Air Pollutants, 

Research Triangle Park, NC.

24. Bush, D.H. et al., 1996, “IMS95 Winter Study - Quality Assurance”, presented at the 1996 U.S. 

EPA/A&WMA International Symposium on Measurement of Toxic and Related Air 

Pollutants, Research Triangle Park, NC.

25. Collett, J. et al., 1996, “1995 Integrated Monitoring Study: Fog Measurements in the Southern 

Valley - Preliminary Results”, presented at the 1996 U.S. EPA/A&WMA International 

Symposium on Measurement of Toxic and Related Air Pollutants, Research Triangle 

Park, NC.

26. Collett, J. et al., 1996, “1995 Integrated Monitoring Study: Fog Measurements in the Northern 

Valley - Preliminary Results”, presented at the 1996 U.S. EPA/A&WMA International 

Symposium on Measurement of Toxic and Related Air Pollutants, Research Triangle 

Park, NC.

27. Gray, H.A., 1996, “1995 Integrated Monitoring Study: Low Wind Speed Study - Preliminary 

Results”, presented at the 1996 U.S. EPA/A&WMA International Symposium on 

Measurement of Toxic and Related Air Pollutants, Research Triangle Park, NC.

28. Lindsey, C. et al., 1996, “Data Collected by a Network of Radar Profilers, Rawinsonde Sounding 

Stations, and Surface Meteorological Monitoring Sites During IMS95”, prepared by 

Sonoma Technology Inc. for the San Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.

29. Barnett, A. et al., 1996, “Integrated Measurements Study - 1995 Audit Program Final Report”, 

prepared by Aerovironment Environmental Services Inc. for the San Joaquin 

Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.

30. Bush, D. et al., 1996, “IMS95 Winter Study Meteorological Measurements Audits”, prepared by 

Aerovironment Environmental Services, Inc. for the San Joaquin Valleywide Air 

Pollution Study Agency.

31. Ashbaugh, L. A. et al., 1996, “Road Silt Loadings in the San Joaquin Valley During IMS-95”, 

prepared by U.C. Davis for the San Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.

32. Wilson, M., 1996, “Traffic Counts in Support of the 1995 Integrated Monitoring Study”, prepared by 

WILTEC for the San Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.

33. Wilson, M., 1996, “Traffic Counts in Support of the 1995 Integrated Monitoring Study - Axle 

Classification Counts”, prepared by WILTEC.

34. Coe, D. et al., 1996, “IMS95 Daily Activity Surveys”, prepared by Sonoma Technology Inc. for the 

San Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.

35. Roberts, P. et al., 1996, “Collection of Continuous Gas-Phase Data at Two Sites During IMS95”, 

prepared by Sonoma Technology Inc. for the San Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution 

Study Agency.

36. Westerinin, A. et al., 1996, “Final Audit Results for the Integrated Monitoring Study”, prepared by 

the Air Resources Board for the San Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.

A1-3
37. Watson, J. G. et al., 1997, “The Fugitive Dust Characterization Study (FDCS): Potential Methods 

and Research Needs for Receptor Methods to Distinguish Among Fugitive Dust 

Sources”, prepared by Desert Research Institute for the San Joaquin Valleywide Air 

Pollution Study Agency. 

38. Watson, J. G. et al., 1997, “Analysis of Historical PM10 and PM2.5 Measurements in Central 

California”, prepared by Desert Research Institute for the San Joaquin Valleywide Air 

Pollution Study Agency.

39. Ondov, J., 1997, “Technical Support Study No. 13: Feasibility of Using Rare Earth Isotope and 

Activatable Tracers for Tracking the Fate of Primary and Secondary Aerosols from 

Combustion Sources”, prepared by John Ondov for the San Joaquin Valleywide Air 

Pollution Study Agency.

40. Pankratz, D., 1997, “Quality Assurance Project Plan for Evaluation and Improvement of Methods 

for Determining Ammonia Emissions in the San Joaquin Valley”, prepared by 

Aerovironment for the San Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.

41. Richards, L. W., 1997, “Technical Support Study 11: Investigating the Dynamics and Chemistry of 

Fog Formation and Dissipation - Literature Review”, prepared by Sonoma Technology 

Inc. for the San Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.

42. Collett, J. et al., 1997, “Technical Support Study 11: Investigating the Dynamics and Chemistry of 

Fog Formation and Dissipation - San Joaquin Valley Fog Measurements During the 

1995 Integrated Monitoring Study”, prepared by Colorado State University for the San 

Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.

43. Pankratz, D. et al., 1997, “Measurements Report for High Resolution Meteorological Monitoring in 

the San Joaquin Valley”, prepared by Aerovironment Environmental Service Inc. for the 

San Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.

44. Pandis, S. et al., 1997, “Technical Support Study 11: Investigating the Dynamics and Chemistry of 

Fog Formation and Dissipation Paper Copies of References Cited in the Review of 

Literature on Fogs”, prepared by Carnegie Mellon University for the San Joaquin 

Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.

45. Richards, L. W. et al., 1997, “Technical Support Study 11: Investigating the Dynamics and 

Chemistry of Fog Formation and Dissipation Phase II Report Measurement at the 

Candalabra Tower”, prepared by Sonoma Technology Inc. for the San Joaquin 

Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.

46. Pandis, S. et al., 1997, “Technical Support Study 11: Investigating the Dynamics and Chemistry of 

Fog Formation and Dissipation Fog Modeling”, prepared by Carnegie Mellon University 

for the San Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.

47. Chow, J. C. et al., 1997, “San Joaquin Valley 1995 Integrated Monitoring Study: Documentation, 

Evaluation, and Descriptive Data Analysis of PM10, PM2.5 and Precursor Gas 

Measurements Technical Support Studies No. 4 and 8”, prepared by the Desert 

Research Institute for the San Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.

A1-4
48. Chow, J. C. et al., 1997, “Size-resolved Particle and Light Extinction Measurements During 

IMS95”, presented at the A&WMAVisual Air Quality - Aerosols and Global Radiation 

Balance Conference, Bartlett, NH.

49. Solomon, P. A. et al., 1997. “Operational Field Monitoring Plan for the 1995/1996 Integrated 

Monitoring Study (IMS95) of the California Regional PM10 Air Quality Study 

(CRPAQS), Post Field Version, Draft Report”, prepared by Pacific Gas & Electric 

Company for the San Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.

50. Solomon, P. A. et al., 1997, “Site Description Report for the 1995 Integrated Monitoring Study 

(IMS95) of the California Regional PM10 Air Quality Study (CRPAQS), Post Field 

Version, Final Report”, prepared by Pacific Gas & Electric Company for the San 

Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.

51. Fitz, D., 1997, “Evaluation and Improvement of Methods for Determining Ammonia Emissions in 

the San Joaquin Valley Field Data Report”, prepared by University of California, 

Riverside CE-CERT for the San Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.

52. McDade, C., 1997, “Ims95 Data Analysis Draft Work Plan for Work Elements 7.3, 7.4, 7.5”, 

prepared by ENSR Consulting & Engineering for the San Joaquin Valleywide Air 

Pollution Study Agency.

53. Magliano, K. L., 1997, “Work Plan for Chemical Mass Balance Modeling of IMS95 Data”, prepared 

by the California Air Resources Board for the San Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution 

Study Agency.

54. Blanchard, C., 1997, “California Regional PM10 Air Quality Study 1995 Integrated Monitoring 

Study Data Analysis Combined Workplan for Tasks 4.2.1 and 4.5.6”, prepared by 

Envair for the San Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.

55. Chinkin, L. R. et al., 1997, “IMS 95 Data Analysis Workplans for Tasks 4.1.2, 4.5.1, 4.5.3, 4.6.1, 

4.6.2, 4.7.1, and 4.7.2”, prepared by Sonoma Technology, Inc. for the San Joaquin 

Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.

56. Collins, J., 1997, “IMS95 Data Analysis Workplan for Work Element 3.3 Boundaries and 

Backgrounds”, prepared by the University of California, Riverside, CE-CERT for the 

San Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.

57. Collet, J., 1997, “Work Plan for Work Element 4.6.7”, prepared by Colorado State University for 

the San Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.

58. Collet, J., 1997, “Work Plan for Work Element 4.6.8”, prepared by Colorado State University for 

the San Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.

59. Pandis, S., 1997, “Work Plan for Work Element 4.6.4”, prepared by Carnegie Mellon University for 

the San Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.

60. “Lehrman, D. L., 1997, “Work Plan for IMS95 Analysis Elements 2.2.2 and 2.2.3”, prepared by 

Technical & Business Systems, Inc. for the San Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution Study 

Agency.

A1-5
61. McDade, C. E., 1997, “Draft Final Report IM95 Data Analysis Work Elements 7.3 Contributions of 

Chemical Constituents to Visibility Reduction, 7.4 Contributions of Chemical 

Constituents to Light Extinction Budget, 7.5 Contributions of Emission Sources to Light 

Extinction Budget”, prepared by ENSR Consulting and Engineering for the San Joaquin 

Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.

62. Chinkin, L. R. et al., 1998, “Use of Ambient Data to Evaluate a Regional Emission Inventory in the 

San Joaquin Valley”, presented at the A&WMA PM2.5: A Fine Particle Standard 

Conference, Long Beach, CA.

63. Coe, D. L. et al., 1998, “Technical Support Study 15: Evaluation and Improvement of Methods for 

Determining Ammonia Emissions in the San Joaquin Valley Final Report”, prepared by 

Sonoma Technology, Inc. for the San Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.

64. Hackney, R. A. et al., 1998, “Meteorological Data Analysis of Surface, Upper Air, and Synoptic 

Conditions during the Integrated Monitoring System 1995 (IMS95) Study Period, from 

November 1995 through January 1996”, presented at the A&WMA PM2.5: A Fine 

Particle Standard Conference, Long Beach, CA.

65. Hughes, V. et al., 1998, “Development of the Baseline PM-10 Emissions Inventory for Modeling 

and Data Analysis of the IMS-95 Wintertime Field Study”, presented at the A&WMA 

PM2.5: A Fine Particle Standard Conference, Long Beach, CA.

66. Hoag, K. et al., 1998, “Integrated Monitoring Study 1995: Variations in Fog Chemistry as a 

Function of Drop Size and Their Effects on Aerosol Processing”, presented at the 

A&WMA PM2.5: A Fine Particle Standard Conference, Long Beach, CA.

67. Collett, J. L. et al., 1998, “Integrated Monitoring Study 1995: The Effect of Internal Acid Buffering 

on Aerosol Formation in San Joaquin Valley Fogs”, presented at the A&WMA PM2.5: A 

Fine Particle Standard Conference, Long Beach, CA.

68. Schauer, J. J. et al., 1998, “Source Apportionment of Wintertime Gas-Phase and Particle-Phase 

Air Pollutants Using Organic Compounds as Tracers”, presented at the A&WMA 

PM2.5: A Fine Particle Standard Conference, Long Beach, CA.

69. Kaduwela, A. P. et al., 1998, “Numerical Simulation of Particulate Matter in the San Joaquin 

Valley: Application of UAM-AERO to the January 4-6, 1996 Winter Episode”, presented 

at the A&WMA PM2.5: A Fine Particle Standard Conference, Long Beach, CA.

70. Magliano, K. L. et al., 1998, “Chemical Mass Balance Modeling of the 1995 Integrated Monitoring 

Study Database”, presented at the A&WMA PM2.5: A Fine Particle Standard 

Conference, Long Beach, CA.

71. Coe, D. L. et al., 1998, “The Use of a Day-Specific Source Activity Database to Augment CMB 

Source Apportionment Modeling”, presented at the A&WMA PM2.5: A Fine Particle 

Standard Conference; Long Beach, CA.

72. Kumar, N. et al., 1998, “Evaluation of Gas-Aerosol Phase Distribution of Nitrogen and Sulfur in the 

IMS95 Winter Study”, presented at the A&WMA PM2.5: A Fine Particle Standard 

Conference, Long Beach, CA.

A1-6
73. Richards, L. W. et al., 1998, “1995 Integrated Monitoring Study: Comparison of Light Scattering 

Measurements During Winter in the San Joaquin Valley”, presented at the A&WMA 

PM2.5: A Fine Particle Standard Conference, Long Beach, CA.

74. Dye, T. S. et al., 1998, “Mixing Depth Structure and Evolution During the Wintertime in the San 

Joaquin Valley as Diagnosed from Upper-Air Meteorological Data”, presented at the 

A&WMA PM2.5: A Fine Particle Standard Conference, Long Beach, CA.

75. McDade, C. et al., 1998, “Optical Properties of the San Joaquin Valley Aerosol Collected During 

the 1995 Integrated Monitoring Study”, presented at the A&WMA PM2.5 : A Fine 

Particle Standard Conference, Long Beach, CA.

76. Solomon, P.A. et al., 1998, “Overview of the 1995 Integrated Monitoring Study: Field Study, Data 

Analysis, and Modeling”, presented at the A&WMA PM2.5: A Fine Particle Standard 

Conference,; Long Beach, CA.

77. Collett, J. L. et al., 1998, “1995 Integrated Monitoring Study: Measurements at Several Heights on 

a TV Tower During Fog Events in the San Joaquin Valley”, presented at the A&WMA 

PM2.5: A Fine Particle Standard Conference, Long Beach, CA.

78. Blanchard, C. L. et al., 1998, “Spatial and Temporal Variability of Particulate Concentrations and 

Composition as Measured in Four Saturation Monitoring Networks During the 1995 

Integrated Monitoring Study in the San Joaquin Valley, California”, presented at the 

A&WMA PM2.5: A Fine Particle Standard Conference, Long Beach, CA.

79. Collett, J. L. et al., 1998, “Final Report: IMS95 Data Analysis Work Element 4.6.8 How Does 

Acidification of Drops Due to Aqueous Phase Acid Production Limit Aerosol Formation 

in Fog Drops”, prepared by Colorado State University for the San Joaquin Valleywide 

Air Pollution Study Agency.

80. Collett, J. L. et al., 1998, “Final Report: IMS95 Data Analysis Work Element 4.6.7 The Influence of 

Drop Size-Dependent Fog Chemistry on Aerosol Production and Deposition in San 

Joaquin Valley Fogs”, prepared by Colorado State University for the San Joaquin 

Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.

81. Lehrman, D. E. et al., 1998, “Final Report California Regional PM10/PM2.5 Air Quality Study 

(CRPAQS) 1995 Integrated Monitoring Study Data Analysis Work Element 2.2.2 -

Meteorological Representativeness and Work Element 2.2.3 - Fog And Low Clouds 

Characteristics”, prepared by Technical & Business Systems, Inc. for the San Joaquin 

Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.

82. Strader, R. et al., 1998, “Final Report 1995 Integrated Monitoring Study Data Analysis 6.5 

Evaluation of Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation in Winter”, prepared by Carnegie 

Mellon University for the San Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.

83. Pandis, S. et al., 1998, “Final Report 1995 Integrated Monitoring Study Data Analysis Fog Effects 

on PM Concentration and Composition in the SJV”, prepared by Carnegie Mellon 

University for the San Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.

A1-7
84. Blanchard, C. L. et al., 1998, “Final Report for Tasks 4.2.1 and 4.5.6 Spatial Representativeness 

of Monitoring Sites and Zones of Influence of Emission Sources”, prepared by Envair 

for the San Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.

85. Magliano, K. L. et al., 1998, “Final Report Chemical Mass Balance Modeling of Data from the 1995 

Integrated Monitoring Study”, prepared by the California Air Resources Board for the 

San Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.

86. Carr, E. L. et al., 1998, “Final Report San Joaquin Valley Regional PM-10 Study Characterizing 

Micrometeorological Phenomena: Mixing and Diffusion in Low Wind Speed Conditions 

Phase III: Monitoring and Data Analysis”, prepared by Systems Applications 

International for the San Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.

87. Dye, T. S. et al., 1998, “Measurement Methods Validation: Adequacy and Validation of 

Meteorological Measurements Aloft During IMS95”, prepared by Sonoma Technology, 

Inc. for the San Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.

88. Coe, D. L. et al., 1998, “Emission Source Activity Detection: Analysis of CMB Model Results and 

Daily Activity Data for IMS95”, prepared by Sonoma Technology, Inc. for the San 

Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.

89. Main, H. H. et al., 1998, “Characterization of the Spatial and Temporal Patterns of Visibility in the 

San Joaquin Valley During IMS95, prepared by Sonoma Technology, Inc. for the San 

Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.

90. Carr, E. L. et al., 1998, “1995 Integrated Monitoring Study Data Analysis Work Element 4.6.3: 

Time and Length Scales for Mixing of Secondary Aerosols During Stagnation Periods”, 

prepared by Systems Applications International for the San Joaquin Valleywide Air 

Pollution Study Agency.

91. Collins, J. F., 1998, “Characterization of Boundaries and Backgrounds in the San Joaquin Valley 

Integrated Monitoring Study 1995”, prepared by University of California Riverside CECERT for the San Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.

92. Haste, T. L. et al., 1998, “Use of Ambient Data Collected During IMS95 to Evaluate a Regional 

Emissions Inventory for the San Joaquin Valley”, prepared by Sonoma Technology Inc. 

for the San Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.

93. Kumar, N., et al., 1998, “Analysis of Atmospheric Chemistry During 1995 Integrated Monitoring 

Study”, prepared by Sonoma Technology, Inc. for the San Joaquin Valleywide Air 

Pollution Study Agency.

94. Magliano, K. L., et al., 1998, “Draft Modeling Protocol for the California Regional PM10/PM2.5 Air 

Quality Study: Preliminary Approaches and Data Requirements”, prepared by the 

California Air Resources Board for the San Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution Study 

Agency.

95. Pun, B. et al., 1998, “Comments on Field Program Plan for the California Regional PM10/PM2.5 

Air Quality Study”, prepared by Atmospheric and Environmental Research for Pacific 

Gas & Electric.

A1-8
96. Pun, B. et al., 1998, “Phase II Reports Integrated Monitoring Study 95: Assessment of 

Mathematical Models and Associated Data Needs”, prepared by Atmospheric and 

Environmental Research for Pacific Gas & Electric.

97. Pun, B. et al., 1998, “Conceptual Model of Particulate Matter Pollution in the California San 

Joaquin Valley”, prepared by Atmospheric and Environmental Research for Pacific Gas 

& Electric.

98. Richards, W. L. et al., 1998, “Characterization of the Validity of Light Scattering Measurements 

During the 1995 Integrated Monitoring Study”, prepared by Sonoma Technology Inc. 

for the San Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.

99. Schauer, J. J. et al., 1998, “Source Contributions to Airborne Particles in the San Joaquin Valley 

During the IMS95 Study”, prepared by California Institute of Technology for the San 

Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.

100. Seinfeld, J. H. et al., 1998, “Grid-Based Aerosol Modeling: A Tutorial”, prepared by California 

Institute of Technology for the San Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.

101. Watson, J. G. et al., 1998, “Aerometric Field Program Plan for the California Regional 

PM2.5/PM10 Air Quality Study”, prepared by Desert Research Institute for the San 

Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.

102. Wilkinson, J. G., et al., 1998, “A Model to Estimate Temporally Resolved Ammonia Emissions 

at a Dairy”, presented at the A&WMA 91st Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA.

103. Richards, W. L. et al., 1999, “Effects of Atmospheric Dynamics and Chemical Concentrations 

on Aerosol Formation in Fog ” prepared by Sonoma Technology, Inc. for the San 

Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.

104. Magliano, K. L. et al., 1999, “California Regional PM10/PM2.5 Air Quality Study: Objectives 

and Associated Data Analysis and Modeling Approaches”, prepared by the California 

Air Resources Board for the San Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.

105. Chow, J.C. et al., 1999, “Temporal Variations of PM2.5, PM10, and Gaseous Precursors 

During the 1995 Integrated Monitoring Study in Central California”, Atmospheric 

Environment (33).

106. Collett, J. L. et al., 1999, “Spatial and Temporal Variations in San Joaquin Valley Fog 

Chemistry”, Atmospheric Environment (33). 

107. Magliano, K. L. et al., 1999, “Recommendations for Emissions Work in Support of the 

California Regional PM10/PM2.5 Air Quality Study”, prepared by the California Air 

Resources Board for the San Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.

108. Solomon, P. A. et al., 1999, “The 1995 Integrated Monitoring Study (IMS95) of the California 

Regional PM10/PM2.5 Air Quality Study (CRPAQS): Study Overview”, Atmospheric 

Environment (33).

A1-9
109. Solomon, P. A. et al., 1999, “Objectives and Design of Central California’s 1995 Integrated 

Monitoring Study of the California Regional PM10/PM2.5 Air Quality Study”, Journal 

A&WMA.

110. Magliano, K. L. et al., 1999, “Spatial and Temporal Variations in PM10 and PM2.5 Source 

Contributions and Comparison to Emissions During the 1995 Integrated Monitoring 

Study”, Atmospheric Environment (33).

111. Lehrman, D. E., et al., 1999, “Assessment of the Methods and Adequacy of Meteorology 

Measurements for IMS95”, Atmospheric Environment (33).

112. McDade, C. et al., 1999, “Optical Properties of the San Joaquin Valley Aerosol Collected 

During the 1995 Integrated Monitoring Study”, Atmospheric Environment (33).

113. Blanchard, C. L. et al., 1999, “Spatial Scales of Transport and Influence During the 1995 

Integrated Monitoring Study in California’s San Joaquin Valley”, Atmospheric 

Environment (33).

114. Lillis, D. et al., 1999, “Production and Removal of Aerosol in a Polluted Fog Layer - Part I 

Model Development and Evaluation”, Atmospheric Environment (33).

115. Lillis, D. et al., 1999, “Production and Removal of Aerosol in a Polluted Fog Layer - Part II 

Effects of Fogs on PM in the San Joaquin Valley”, Atmospheric Environment (33).

116. Collett, J. L. et al., 1999, “Internal Acid Buffering in San Joaquin Valley Fog Drops and its 

Influence on Aerosol Processing”, Atmospheric Environment (33).

117. Hoag, K, J., et al., 1999, “The Influence of Drop Size-Dependent Fog Chemistry on Aerosol 

Processing by San Joaquin Valley Fogs”, Atmospheric Environment (33).

118. Strader, R. et al., 1999, “Evaluation of Secondary Organic Aerosol Formation in Winter”, 

Atmospheric Environment (33).

119. Pun, B. et al., 1999, “Understanding Particulate Matter Formation in the California San Joaquin 

Valley: Conceptual Model and Data Needs”, Atmospheric Environment (33).

120. Magliano, K. L. et al., 1999, “Field Program Plans for the California Regional PM10/PM2.5 Air 

Quality Study”, in Proceedings of the A&WMA 92nd Annual Meeting. 

121. Wittig, A. E. et al., 1999, “Health and Safety Plan for the California Regional PM10/PM2.5 Air 

Quality Study (CRPAQS)”, prepared by Sonoma Technology Inc. for the San Joaquin 

Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency, STI-999215-1894-HASP.

122. Magliano, K.L. et al, 2000, “Coordinated Efforts of the California Regional PM10/PM2.5 Air 

Quality Study and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Supersite in Fresno, 

California”, in Proceedings of the 93rd Annual A&WMA Conference, Salt Lake City, UT, 

June 19-24, 2000. 

123. Magliano, K. L. et al., 2000, “Light Scattering Measurements in the California Regional 

PM10/PM2.5 Air Quality Study”, In Proceedings of the 93rd Annual A&WMA 

Conference, Salt Lake City, UT, June 19-24, 2000. 

A1-10
124. Schauer, J. J. et al., 2000, “Source Apportionment of Wintertime Gas-Phase and ParticlePhase Air Pollutants Using Organic Compounds as Tracers”, Environmental Science 

and Technology (34), 1821-1832.

125. Blanchard, C. L. et al. 2000, “The Use of Ambient Measurements to Identify Which Precursor 

Species Limit Aerosol Nitrate Formation”, Journal of the Air and Waste Management

Association (50), 2073-2084.

126. Wittig, A. E. et al., 2000, “Quality Integrated Workplan for the Continuous and Filter Air Quality 

Measurements in the California Reqional PM10/PM2.5 Air Quality Study (CRPAQS)”, 

prepared by Sonoma Technology Inc. for the San Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution 

Study Agency, STI-999214-1921-QIWP.

127. Flocchini, R. G. et al., 2001, “Sources and Sinks of PM10 in the San Joaquin Valley”, Interim 

Report to U.S. Department of Agriculture, Contract Nos. 94-33825-0383 and 98-38825-

6063, prepared by University of California Davis.

128. Main, H. et al. 2001, “Managing Data from the California Regional PM10/PM2.5 Air Quality 

Study”, in Proceedings of the A&WMA/AGU Regional Haze and Global Radiation 

Balance Conference, Bend, OR, October 2-5, 2001.

129. Magliano, K.L. et al., 2001, “The California Regional PM10/PM2.5 Air Quality Study 

(CRPAQS): Field Study Description and Initial Findings”, in Proceedings of the 

A&WMA/AGU Regional Haze and Global Radiation Balance Conference, Bend, OR, 

October 2-5, 2001.

130. Richards, L.W. et al., 2001, “Light Scattering Measurements During the California Regional 

PM10/PM2.5 Air Quality Study”, in Proceedings of the A&WMA/AGU Regional Haze 

and Global Radiation Balance Conference, Bend, OR, October 2-5, 2001.

131. Watson, J. G. et al., 2001, “Comparison of Nephelometer Light Scattering Measurements in 

Central California as a Function of Meteorological Variables Particle Size, and Particle 

Composition”, in Proceedings of the A&WMA/AGU Regional Haze and Global 

Radiation Balance Conference, Bend, OR, October 2-5, 2001.

132. Chow, J. C. et al., 2001, “Particle Nitrate Measurements at the Fresno Supersite", in 

Proceedings of the A&WMA/AGU Regional Haze and Global Radiation Balance 

Conference, Bend, OR, October 2-5, 2001.

133. Lowenthal, D. H. et al., 2001, “Particle Size Relationships at the Fresno Supersite”, in 

Proceedings of the A&WMA/AGU Regional Haze and Global Radiation Balance 

Conference, Bend, OR, October 2-5, 2001.

134. Pun B. K. et al., 2001; “Sensitivity of Particulate Matter Nitrate Formation to Precursor 

Emissions in the California San Joaquin Valley”; Environmental Science and 

Technology; (35), 2979-2987.

135. Watson, J.G. et al., 2001, “Comparison and Evaluation of In-Situ And Filter Carbon 

Measurements at the Fresno Supersite”, Journal of Geophysical Research –

Atmospheres”.

A1-11
136. Rappolt, T.J. et al., 2001, “Mapping Air Quality Plumes from Fossil Energy Sources to Assess 

the Impacts of Secondary Aerosol Development”, presented at the SPE/EPA/DOE 

Exploration and Production Environmental Conference, San Antonio, TX, February 

2001.

137. Funk, T. et. al., 2001, “Development of Gridded Spatial Allocation Factors for the State of 

California”, prepared by Sonoma Technology Inc. for the San Joaquin Valleywide Air 

Pollution Study Agency.

138. Knuth, W. et al., 2001, “Fall Saturation Network – An Element of the Satellite Network 

Operations for the CRPAQS”, prepared by Technical & Business Systems Inc. for the 

San Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.

139. Knoderer, C, et. al., 2001, “Data Collected by a 915-MHz Radar Wind Profiler, RASS, and 

Surface Meteorological Station at San Martin, California During Fall 2000 and Winter 

2001 for the California Regional PM10/PM2.5 Air Quality Study (CRPAQS)”, prepared 

by Sonoma Technology Inc. for the San Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution Study 

Agency.

140. Chung, A. et. al, 2001, “Detection of Alkaline Ultrafine Atmospheric Particles at Bakersfield, 

California, Environmental Science Technology, (35), 2184-2190. 

141. Bush, D. et al., 2002, “An Evaluation of Portable Nephelometer Performance During 

CRPAQS”, presented at A&WMA Symposium on Air Quality Measurement Methods 

and Technology, November 13-15, 2002. 

142. Watson, J. G. et al., 2002, “Air Quality Measurements from the Fresno Supersite”, Journal of 

the Air and Waste Management Association, (50), 1321-1334.

143. Watson, J. G. et al., 2002, “A Wintertime PM2.5 Episode at the Fresno, CA, Supersite”, 

Atmospheric Environment (36), 465-475. 

144. Watson, J.G., 2002, “Particle Size Relationships at the Fresno Supersite”, Journal of the Air 

and Waste Management Association, (52), 822-827

145. Herckes, P. et al., 2002, “Organic Matter in Central California Radiation Fogs”, Environmental 

Science & Technology, (36), 4777-4782.

146. Hyslop, N. et. al., 2002, “Continuous PM Measurements in a Rural Town in the San Joaquin 

Valley”, presented at A&WMA Symposium on Air Quality Measurement Methods and 

Technology, November 13-15, 2002.

147. Holmen B. A. et al., 2002, “Lidar-Assisted Measurement of PM10 Emissions from Agricultural 

Tilling in California’s San Joaquin Valley – Part I: Lidar”, Atmospheric Environment 

(35), 3251-3264.

148. Holmen B. A. et al., 2002, “Lidar-Assisted Measurement of PM10 Emissions from Agricultural 

Tilling in California’s San Joaquin Valley – Part II: Emission Factors”, Atmospheric 

Environment, (35), 3265-3277.

A1-12
149. Technical & Business Systems Inc., 2002, “Satellite Network Operations for the California 

Regional PM10/PM2.5 Air Quality Study”, prepared by Technical & Business Systems 

Inc. for the San Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.

150. Bush, D. et. al., 2002, “Final Quality Assurance Audit Report California Regional PM10/PM2.5 

Air Quality Study”, prepared by Parsons Engineering Science for the San Joaquin 

Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.

151. Stiefer, P. et al., 2002, “Atlas of Ground Truth Surveys”, prepared by Sonoma Technology Inc. 

for the San Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.

152. Engelbrecht, J. P., 2002, “Laboratory Measurement Systems Audit”, prepared by Desert 

Research Institute for the San Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.

153. Countess Environmental, 2002, “Quantifying the Contribution of Fugitive Geological Dust to 

Ambient PM10 and PM2.5 Concentrations in the San Joaquin Valley”, prepared for the 

San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District.

154. Whiteaker, J.R., 2002, “Effects of Meteorological Conditions on Aerosol Composition and 

Mixing State in Bakersfield CA”, Environmental Science and Technology, (36), 2345-

2353.

155. Ashbaugh, L.L. et al., 2003, “Soil Sample Collection and Analysis for the Fugitive Dust 

Characterization Study”, Atmospheric Environment, (37), 1163-1173.

156. Chow, J.C. et al., 2003, “Similarities and Differences in PM10 Chemical Source Profiles for 

Geological Dust From the San Joaquin Valley, California”, Atmospheric Environment, 

(37), 1317-1340.

157. Rinehart, L.R. et al., 2003, “Characterization of PM2.5 Associated Organic Compounds of 

Emission Sources Collected During the California Regional PM10/PM2.5 Air Quality 

Study”, in Proceedings of the 96th Annual A&WMA Conference, San Diego, CA, June 

2003.

158. Najita, T. et al., 2003, “Relationship Between PM2.5 and PM10 During the California Reqional 

Particulate Air Quality Study”, presented at the 2003 Annual Conference of the

American Association for Aerosol Research, Anaheim, CA, October 20-24, 2003. 

159. Velasco, P. et al., 2003, “Diurnal Variations in PM2.5, PM10, Chemical Components, Gaseous 

Precursors, and Co-Pollutants during the California Regional Particulate Air Quality

Study”, presented at the 2003 Annual Conference of the American Association for 

Aerosol Research, Anaheim, CA, October 20-24, 2003. 

160. Turkiewicz, K. et al., 2003, “Spatial and Temporal Variations of PM2.5, PM10, and their 

Chemical Components during the California Regional Particulate Air Quality Study”, 

presented at the 2003 Annual Conference of the American Association for Aerosol 

Research, Anaheim, CA, October 20-24, 2003.

161. Casuccio, G. et al., 2003, “Characterization of San Joaquin Valley Samples Using Scanning 

Electron Microscopy (SEM) Techniques”, presented at the 2003 Annual Conference of 

the American Association for Aerosol Research, Anaheim, CA, October 20-24, 2003.

A1-13
162. Chow, J. C. et al., 2003, “Spatial and Temporal Variations in PM2.5 Chemical Composition 

during Winter, 2000/2001 Episodes in Central California”, presented at the 2003 

Annual Conference of the American Association for Aerosol Research, Anaheim, CA, 

October 20-24, 2003.

163. Watson, J., et al., 2003, “Equivalence and Comparability Among Different PM2.5 Mass 

Measurements in Central California”, presented at the 2003 Annual Conference of the 

American Association for Aerosol Research, Anaheim, CA, October 20-24, 2003.

164. Countess, R. et. al. 2003, “Fugitive Dust Concentrations in the San Joaquin Valley”, presented 

at the 2003 Annual Conference of the American Association for Aerosol Research,

Anaheim, CA, October 20-24, 2003.

165. Herckes, P. et. al., 2003, “Fog Processing of Atmospheric Organic Compounds During the 

California Regional PM10/PM2.5 Air Quality Study (CRPAQS)”, presented at the 2003 

Annual Conference of the American Association for Aerosol Research, Anaheim, CA, 

October 20-24, 2003.

166. McDonald, C. et. al., 2003, “Evaluation of Transport of Particulate Matter and Its Precursors 

Into and Out of the San Joaquin Valley, California, Using Two Approaches presented 

at the 2003 Annual Conference of the American Association for Aerosol Research,

Anaheim, CA, October 20-24, 2003.

167. Kleeman, M. et. al., 2003, “Characterization of Atmospheric Nano-Fine Particles at Bakersfield 

California”, presented at the 2003 Annual Conference of the American Association for 

Aerosol Research, Anaheim, CA, October 20-24, 2003.

168. Kleeman, M. et. al., 2003, “Simulating Air Quality in the San Joaquin Valley with a SourceOriented Externally Mixed Airshed Model; Evaluation of Model Performance and 

Control Strategy Effectiveness”, presented at the 2003 Annual Conference of the 

American Association for Aerosol Research, Anaheim, CA, October 20-24, 2003.

169. Heissler, S. 2003, “Contributions of Chemical Constituents to Visibility Reduction during the 

California Regional PM10/PM2.5 Air Quality Study”, presented at the 2003 Annual 

Conference of the American Association for Aerosol Research, Anaheim, CA, October 

20-24, 2003.

170. Countess, R. et. al., 2003, “Contribution of Vegetative Burning to PM2.5 Concentrations in the 

San Joaquin Valley”, presented at the 2003 Annual Conference of the American 

Association for Aerosol Research, Anaheim, CA, October 20-24, 2003.

171. Rappolt, T.J. et. al., 2003, “Near-Term and Low Wind Dispersion Measurements of Plumes 

from Steam Generators during the CRPAQS presented at the 2003 Annual Conference 

of the American Association for Aerosol Research, Anaheim, CA, October 20-24, 2003.

172. Alcorn, S. et. at., 2003, “Comparisons Between California Regional PM10/PM2.5 Air Quality 

Study (CRPAQS) Particle Light Scattering and Fine Particle Mass Data”, presented at 

the 2003 Annual Conference of the American Association for Aerosol Research,

Anaheim, CA, October 20-24, 2003.

A1-14
173. Chen, A. et. al., 2003, “Evaluating Similarities of Source Profiles Using Pair Slope Distribution 

(PSD) Method: Applications to PM2.5 Source Profiles from the BRAVO and CRPAQS 

Studies”, presented at the 2003 Annual Conference of the American Association for 

Aerosol Research, Anaheim, CA, October 20-24, 2003.

174. Hyslop, N. et. al., 2003, “Vertical Variations in PM and PM Precursor Concentrations in the 

San Joaquin Valley, California”, presented at the 2003 Annual Conference of the 

American Association for Aerosol Research, Anaheim, CA, October 20-24, 2003.

175. Chang, et. al., 2003, “Aerosol Processing and Removal by Fogs: Observations in Radiation 

Fogs During the CRPAQS Study”, presented at the 2003 Annual Conference of the 

American Association for Aerosol Research, Anaheim, CA, October 20-24, 2003.

176. Chin, et. al., 2003, “Comparison Between Particulate Matter Sampled at Urban and Rural 

Locations in the San Joaquin Valley: Continuous Measurement of Single Particle Size 

and Composition”, presented at the 2003 Annual Conference of the American 

Association for Aerosol Research, Anaheim, CA, October 20-24, 2003.

177. Rinehart, L. et. al., 2003, “Semi-volatile Organic Compound Characterization and Evaluation of 

PM2.5 Emission Sources Collected During the California Regional PM10/PM2.5 Air 

Quality Study”, presented at the 2003 Annual Conference of the American Association 

for Aerosol Research, Anaheim, CA, October 20-24, 2003.

178. Hering, S. et. al., 2003, “Temporal and Spatial Distribution of Fine Particle Nitrate and Black 

Carbon in the San Joaquin Valley of California, USA”, presented at the 2003 Annual 

Conference of the American Association for Aerosol Research, Anaheim, CA, October 

20-24, 2003.

179. Scow, K. M. et al., 2003, “DNA Profiling Analysis of Dust and Source Material Collected in the 

CRPAQS Fall 2000 Sampling Campaign”, prepared by the University of California, 

Davis for the San Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.

180. Hafner, H. R., et. al., 2003, “California Reqional PM10/PM2.5 Air Quality Study (CRPAQS) 

Management of Anchor Site Data”, prepared by Sonoma Technology Inc for the San 

Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency, STI-999242-2087-FR.

181. Wittig, A.E., et. al., 2003, “California Regional PM10/PM2.5 Air Quality Study (CRPAQS) 

Anchor Site Measurements and Operations”, prepared by Sonoma Technology Inc for 

the San Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency, STI-999231-2332-FR. 

182. Hyslop, N. P., et. al., 2003, “California Regional PM10/PM2.5 Air Quality Study (CRPAQS) 

Data Quality Summary Reports”, prepared by Sonoma Technology Inc for the San 

Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency, STI-999242-2310-FR.

183. Neff, W.D., et. al., 2003, “Final Report Contract 99-4PM A Study of Mesoscale Transport and 

Boundary Layer Processes in the Central Valley of California”, prepared by the 

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration for the San Joaquin Valleywide Air 

Pollution Study Agency.

A1-15
184. Zielinska, B. et. al., 2003, “California Regional PM10/PM2.5 Air Quality Study – Organic 

Compound Measurements”, prepared by Desert Research Institute for the San Joaquin 

Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.

185. Ervens, B. et. al., 2003, “On the Drop-Size Dependence of Organic Acid and Formaldehyde 

Concentrations in Fog”, Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry, (46), 239-269.

186. Whiteaker, J.R., 2003, “Hydroxymethanesulfonate as a Tracer for Fog Processing of Individual 

Aerosol Particles”, Atmospheric Environment, (37), 1033-1043.

187. Fitz, D. et. al., 2004, “Development of a Gas and Particulate Matter Organic Speciation 

Profile Database”, prepared by the University of California, Riverside Center for 

Environmental Engineering and Technology for the San Joaquin Valleywide Air 

Pollution Study Agency.

188. Prather, K., 2004, ATOFMS Field Study Operations Final Report, prepared by the 

University of California, San Diego, Prather Research Group for the San Joaquin 

Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.

189. Chow, J.C. et. al., 2004, “Comparison of PM2.5 Chemical Composition from the Fresno 

Supersite During Wintertime Pollution Episodes in Central California”, presented at the 

13th World Clean Air and Environmental Protection Congress and Exhibition, London 

England, August 2004.

190. Watson, J.G. et. al., 2004, “Particle Nitrate Sampling Artifacts in California’s San Joaquin 

Valley”, presented at the 13th World Clean Air and Environmental Protection Congress 

and Exhibition, London England, August 2004.

191. DeYoung, R.J. et. al., 2004, “Aerosol Transport in the California Central Valley Observed by 

Airborne Lidar”

192. Collett, J.L. et. al., 2004, “The Organic Composition of California Fogs”, submitted to the 3rd

International Conference on Fog and Fog Collection, Capetown, South Africa, October 

2004.

193. Carillo, J.H. et. al., 2004, “An Economical Optical Fog Detector”, submitted to the 3rd

International Conference on Fog and Fog Collection, Capetown, South Africa, October 

2004.

194. Hyslop, N.P., et. al., 2004, “Exploratory Data Analysis of Particulate Matter Concentrations in 

Corcoran, California”, prepared by Sonoma Technology, Inc, for the San Joaquin 

Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency, STI-999300-2485-FR.

195. Bahm, K.E. et. al., 2004, “Detecting Source Activities and Reconciling Ambient Measurement 

Variations with Field Observations – California Regional PM10 and PM2.5 Air Quality 

Study (CRPAQS) Data Analysis Task 4.3”, prepared for the San Joaquin Valleywide 

Air Pollution Study Agency by Sonoma Technology Inc., STI-902328-2579-TM. 

196. Baxter, B. et. al., 2004, “Task 1.3 Adequacy and Validity of Meteorological Measurements”, 

prepared by Technical & Business Systems for the San Joaquin Valleywide Air 

Pollution Study Agency.

A1-16
197. Lehrman D. et. al., 2004, “Task 3.3 How Well Do Measurements Characterize Critical 

Meteorological Features”, prepared by Technical & Business Systems for the San 

Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.

198. Knuth, B., 2004, “Task 5.1 CRPAQS Synoptic Conditions Weather Typing”, prepared by 

Technical & Business Systems for the San Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution Study 

Agency.

199. Held, T. et. al., 2004, “Modeling Particulate Matter in the San Joaquin Valley with a SourceOriented Externally Mixed Three-Dimensional Photochemical Grid Model: Atmospheric 

Environment, 38(22), 3689-3711.

200. Heisler, S. L., 2004, “Contributions of Chemical Constituents to Visibility Reduction During the 

California Regional PM10/PM2.5 Air Quality Study”, prepared by ENSR Corporation for 

the San Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.

201. Tracer ES&T, 2004, “California Regional PM10/PM2.5 Air Quality Study (CRPAQS) Initial Data 

Analysis of Clean Airship 1 Measurements (Task 6.4)”, prepared by Tracer 

Environmental Sciences & Technologies, Inc., for the San Joaquin Valleywide Air 

Pollution Study Agency.

202. Buhr, M.P. et. al., 2004, Examination of Reactive Nitrogen Partitioning at the Bakersfield and 

Angiola Field Sites”, prepared by Sonoma Technology Inc. for the San Joaquin 

Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.

203. Buhr, M.P. et. al., 2004, “Comparison and Descriptive Evaluation of the Airborne and GroundBased Measurements Collected During the CCOS Field Experiment”, prepared by 

Sonoma Technology Inc. for the San Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.

204. Yoho, D. et. al., 2004, “How is Visibility Affected by Atmospheric Constituents, Sources, and 

Meteorology – Sources of Light Extinction in the Mojave Desert”, prepared by 

Technical & Business Systems for the San Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution Study 

Agency.

205. Alcorn, S.A. et. al., 2004, “Comparisons Between Light Scattering and Fine-Particle Mass 

Data”, prepared by Sonoma Technology Inc. for the San Joaquin Valleywide Air 

Pollution Study Agency.

206. Pun, B., 2004, “CRPAQS Task 2.7 When and Where Does High O3 Correspond to High 

PM2.5? How Much PM2.5 Corresponds to Photochemical End Products?”, prepared 

by Atmospheric and Environmental Research, Inc. for the San Joaquin Valleywide Air 

Pollution Study Agency.

207. Collett, J. L. et. al., 2005, “Examination of the Influence of California Regional Particulate Air 

Quality Study Fog Episodes on Aerosol Formation and Removal”, prepared by 

Colorado State University for the San Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution Study Agency.

208. Raffuse, S. M. et. al., 2005, “Emission Inventory Reconciliation in the San Joaquin Valley”, 

prepared by Sonoma Technology Inc. for the San Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution 

Study Agency.

A1-17
209. Held, T. et. al., 2005, “A Comparison of the UCD/CIT Air Quality Model and the CMB SourceReceptor Model for Primary Airborne Particulate Matter”, Atmospheric Environment,

(39), 2281-2297. 

210. Kleeman, M.J., Ying, Q., Kaduwela, A. 2005. “Control Strategies for the Reduction of Airborne 

Particulate Nitrate in California’s San Joaquin Valley”. Atmospheric Environment, (39): 

5325-5341.

211. Fahey, K.M., Pandis, S.N., Collett, Jr. J.L., Herckes, P. 2005. “The influence of sizedependent droplet composition on pollutant processing by fogs”. Atmospheric 

Environment, (39): 4561-4574. 

212. Blanchard, C., 2005, “Comparison of Particulate Nitrate Formation in Different 

Chemical Regimes”, presented at the American Association for Aerosol Research 

(AAAR), Supersites Conference, February 2005, Atlanta, GA.

213. Cahill, T., 2005, “Continuous Analysis of Fresno Aerosols by Size, Time, and 

Elemental Concentrations, March – December 2001”, presented at the American 

Association for Aerosol Research (AAAR), Supersites Conference, February 2005, 

Atlanta, GA.

214. Collett, J., 2005, “Pollution Processing by Radiation Fogs During the California 

Regional PM10/PM2.5 Air Quality Study (CRPAQS)”, presented at the American 

Association for Aerosol Research (AAAR), Supersites Conference, February 2005, 

Atlanta, GA.

215. Goohs, K., 2005, “Function and Performance of a New Real-Time Black Carbon 

Monitor During the 2004 Fresno Study”, presented at the American Association for 

Aerosol Research (AAAR), Supersites Conference, February 2005, Atlanta, GA.

216. Herckes, P., 2005, “Fog Processing of Atmospheric Organic Matter”, presented at the 

American Association for Aerosol Research (AAAR), Supersites Conference, February 

2005, Atlanta, GA.

217. Lurmann, F., 2005, “Spatial Representativeness of the Fresno Supersite PM and 

Gaseous Co-Pollutant Measurements”, presented at the American Association for 

Aerosol Research (AAAR), Supersites Conference, February 2005, Atlanta, GA.

218. Magliano, K., 2005, “Comparison of Air Quality During Two Winter Episodes”, 

presented at the American Association for Aerosol Research (AAAR), Supersites 

Conference, February 2005, Atlanta, GA.

219. Magliano, K., 2005, “PM2.5 Concentrations in Urban and Rural Areas”, presented at 

the American Association for Aerosol Research (AAAR), Supersites Conference,

February 2005, Atlanta, GA.

220. McCarthy, M., 2005, “The Role of Nighttime Chemistry in Winter Ammonium Nitrate 

Formation in the San Joaquin Valley”, presented at the American Association for 

Aerosol Research (AAAR), Supersites Conference, February 2005, Atlanta, GA.

A1-18
221. Pun, B., 2005, “Relationships Between Ozone and PM During CRPAQS”, presented at 

the American Association for Aerosol Research (AAAR), Supersites Conference,

February 2005, Atlanta, GA.

222. Qin, X., 2005, “ATOFMS Measurements at Urban and Rural Locations: Comparison of 

Single Particle Size and Composition”, presented at the American Association for 

Aerosol Research (AAAR), Supersites Conference, February 2005, Atlanta, GA.

223. Watson, J., 2005, “Spatial Variability of PM2.5 Species in the California Central Valley”, 

presented at the American Association for Aerosol Research (AAAR), Supersites 

Conference, February 2005, Atlanta, GA.

224. Zielinska, B., 2005, “Semi-volatile Organic Compounds: Characterization at the Fresno 

Supersite During Wintertime Stagnation Episodes”, presented at the American 

Association for Aerosol Research (AAAR), Supersites Conference, February 2005, 

Atlanta, GA.

225. Cassucio, G., 2005, “Corcoran Fall 2000 study: Apportionment of ambient PM10 using 

scanning electron microscopy”, presented at the American Association for Aerosol 

Research (AAAR), Supersites Conference, February 2005, Atlanta, GA.

226. Chow, J., 2005, “Particulate carbon measurements in California's San Joaquin Valley”, 

presented at the American Association for Aerosol Research (AAAR), Supersites 

Conference, February 2005, Atlanta, GA.

227. Chow, J.C., 2005, “Loss of PM2.5 Nitrate from Filter Samples in Central California”, 

Journal of the Air and Waste Management Association, (55) 1158-1168.

228. Watson, J.G., et. al., 2005, “Nanoparticle and Ultrafine Particle Events at the Fresno 

Supersite”. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, (56) 417-430.

229. Gorin, C.A., et. al., 2005, “Wood Smoke Contributions to Ambient Aerosol in Fresno 

During Winter 2003-2004”. Prepared for the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control 

District. Fresno, California. 

230. Park, K., et. al., 2005, “Comparison of continuous and filter-based carbon 

measurements at the Fresno Supersite”. Journal of the Air & Waste Management 

Association, (56) 474-491.

231. Herner, J.D., et. al., 2005, “Size and Composition Distribution of Airborne Particulate Matter in 

Northern California 1. Particulate Mass, Carbon, and Water Soluble Ions”, Journal of 

the Air & Waste Management Association, (55), 30-51.

232. Turkiewicz, K., et. al., 2006, “Comparison of Two Winter Air Quality Episodes During 

the California Regional Particulate Air Quality Study”. Journal of the Air & Waste 

Management Association (56): 467-473.

233. Rinehart, L.R., et. al., 2006, “Spatial Distribution of PM2.5 Associated Organic 

Compounds in Central California”. Atmospheric Environment (40): 290-303.

A1-19
234. Chow, J.C., Watson, J.G., Park, K., Lowenthal, D.H., Robinson, N.F., Magliano, K.L.,

2006. “Comparison of Particle Light Scattering and PM2.5 Mass in Central California”. 

Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (56): 398-410.

235. Chow, J.C., Watson, J.G., Lowenthal, D.H., Chen, A.L-W., Magliano, K.L., 2006. 

“Particulate Carbon Measurements in California’s San Joaquin Valley”. Chemosphere 

(62): 337-348.

236. Chow, J.C., Chen, A.L-W., Watson, J.G., Lowenthal, D.H., Magliano, K.L., Turkiewicz, 

K., Lehrman, D., 2006. “PM2.5 Chemical Composition and Spatiotemporal Variability 

During the California Regional PM10/PM2.5 Air Quality Study (CRPAQS)”. Journal of 

Geophysical Research, (111): D10S04, doi:10.1029/2005JD006457.

237. Ying, Q., Kleeman, M.J., 2006. “Source Contributions to the Regional Distribution of 

Secondary Particulate Matter in California”. Atmospheric Environment (40): 736-752.

238. Herner, J.D., Green, P.G., Kleeman, M.J. 2006. “Measuring the Trace Elemental 

Composition of Size-Resolved Airborne Particles”. Environmental Science and 

Technology (40): 1925-1933.

239. Chow, J.C., Watson, J.G., Lowenthal, D.H., Chen, A.L-W., Tropp, R., Park, K., 

Magliano, K.L., 2006. “PM2.5 and PM10 Mass Measurements in California’s San 

Joaquin Valley”. Aerosol Science & Technology (40): 796-810.

240. Lurmann, F. et. al., 2006, “Processes Influencing Secondary Aerosol Formation in the San 

Joaquin Valley During Winter”, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 

(56): 1679-1693.

241. Brown, S.G. et. al., 2006, “Wintertime Vertical Variations in Particulate Matter (PM) and 

Precursor Concentrations in the San Joaquin Valley During the California Regional 

Coarse PM/Fine PM Air Quality Study”, Journal of the Air & Waste Management 

Association, (56): 1267-1277.

242. MacDonald, C.P. et. al., 2006, “Transport and Dispersion During Wintertime Particulate Matter 

Episodes in the San Joaquin Valley, California, Journal of the Air & Waste 

Management Association, (56): 961-976.

243. Gorin, C.A. et. al., 2006, “Wood Smoke Contribution to Winter Aerosol in Fresno, CA”, Journal 

of the Air & Waste Management Association, (56): 1584-1590.

244. Chow, J.C. et. al., 2006, “Evaluation of Organic markers for Chemical Mass Balance Source 

Apportionment at the Fresno Supersite”, Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss. (6) 10341-

10372

245. Grover, B.D. et. al., 2006, “Measurement of Both Volatile and Semi-Volatile Fractions of Fine 

Particulate Matter in Fresno, CA”, Aerosol Science & Technology, (40): 811-826.

246. Liang, J. et. al., 2006, “Off-line Diagnostic Analyses of a Three-dimensional PM Model Using 

Two Matrix Factorization Methods”, Atmospheric Environment, (40): 

A1-20
247. Qin, X. et. al., 2006, “Impact of Biomass Emissions on Particle Chemistry During the California 

Regional Particulate Air Quality Study”, International Journal of Mass Spectrometry, 

(258): 142-150.

248. Qin, X. et. al., 2006, “Comparison of Two Methods for Obtaining Quantitative Mass 

Concentrations from Aerosol Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry Measurements”, Anal. 

Chem., (78): 6169-6178.

249. Chen, A.L-W., et. al., 2007, “Quantifying PM2.5 Source Contributions for the San Joaquin 

Valley with Multivariate Receptor Models”. Environmental Science and Technology, 

(41), 2818-2826.

250. Hering, et. al., 2007, “Comparison of Particle Size Distributions at Urban and 

Agricultural Sites in California’s San Joaquin Valley”. Aerosol Science and 

Technology, (41:1), 86-96.

251. Watson, J.G. et. al., 2008, “Estimating Aerosol Light Scattering at the Fresno Supersite”, 

Atmospheric Environment, (42), 1186-1196.

252. Chow, J.C. et.al., 2008, “Size Resolved Aerosol Chemical Concentrations at Rural and Urban 

Sites in Central California, USA”, Atmospheric Research, (90), 243-252.

253. Ying, Q. et. al., 2008, “Modeling Air Quality During the California Regional PM10/PM2.5 Air 

Quality Study (CRPAQS) Using the UCD/CIT Source Oriented Air Quality Model – Part 

I. Base Case Model Results”, Atmospheric Environment, (42), 8954-8966.

254. Ying, Q. et. al., 2008, “Modeling Air Quality During the California Regional PM10/PM2.5 Air 

Quality Study (CRPAQS) Using the UCD/CIT Source Oriented Air Quality Model – Part 

II. Regional Source Apportionment of Primary Airborne Particulate Matter”, 

Atmospheric Environment, (42), 8967-8978.

255. Kleeman, M.J. et.al., 2008, “Size Distribution of Particle-Phase Molecular Markers During a 

Severe Winter Pollution Episode”, Environmental Science & Technology, (42), 6469-

6475. 

256. Ying, Q. et. al., 2008, “Modeling Air Quality During the California Regional PM10/PM2.5 Air 

Quality Study (CRPAQS) Using the UCD/CIT Source Oriented Air Quality Model – Part 

III. Regional Source Apportionment of Secondary and Total Airborne PM2.5 and 

PM0.1”, Atmospheric Environment, (43), 419-430.

257. Chen, J. et. al., 2009, “Source Apportionment of Visual Impairment During the California 

Regional PM10/PM2.5 Air Quality Study, Atmospheric Environment, (43), 6136-6144.

258. Kleeman, M.J., et. al., 2009, “Source Apportionment of Fine (PM1.8) and Ultrafine (PM0.1) 

Airborne Particulate Matter During a Severe Winter Pollution Episode, Environmental 

Science & Technology, (43), 272-279.

259. Livingstone, P.L., et.al., 2009, “Simulating PM Concentrations During a Winter Episode in a 

Subtropical Valley and Sensitivity Simulations and Evaluation methods”, Atmospheric 

Environment, (43), 5971-5977.

A1-21
260. Ying, Q., et. al., 2009, “Regional Contributions to Airborne Particulate Matter in Central 

California During a Severe Pollution Episode”, Atmospheric Environment, (43), 1218-

1228.

261. Pun, B., et. al., 2009, “Modeling Wintertime Particulate Matter Formation in Central California”, 

Atmospheric Environment, (43) 402-409.

262. Chen, J., et. al., 2010, “Source Apportionment of Wintertime Secondary Organic Aerosol 

During the California Regional PM10/PM2.5 Air Quality Study”, Atmospheric 

Environment, (44), 1331-1340.

263. Hu, J., et. al., 2010, “Particulate Air Quality Model Predictions Using Prognostic Versus 

Diagnostic Meteorology in Central California”, Atmospheric Environment, (44), 215-

226.

A1-22
SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY PM2.5 WEIGHT OF EVIDENCE ANALYSIS

APPENDIX A2

ASSESSMENT OF THE REPRESENTATIVENESS OF 

2011 PM2.5 BETA ATTENUATION MONITOR DATA FROM MADERA
Assessment of the Representativeness of 

2011 PM2.5 Beta Attenuation Monitor Data from Madera

Overview

PM2.5 monitoring in Madera began in 2010 with deployment of the Federal Equivalence 

Method Beta Attenuation Monitor (FEM BAM) at the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution 

Control District (SJVAPCD) Madera City monitoring site. Since there was no previous 

PM2.5 data record for Madera, there was no baseline for evaluating the PM2.5 levels 

measured with the BAM. Based on established concentration gradients within the San 

Joaquin Valley, concentrations measured in Madera are expected to be similar or 

slightly higher than measurements in Merced, but lower than those from Fresno. They 

should also depict a strong seasonal pattern, with low season average concentrations 

below 10 μg/m3

. However, the first complete data year, 2011, did not conform with 

these expectations. 

Comparison of 2011 concentrations measured at Madera and Fresno revealed that on 

an annual basis, Madera was 30 percent higher compared with measurements in 

Fresno, or 4.8 μg/m3. During what is typically regarded as the low PM season, 

measured concentrations at Madera were twice as high as those measured in Fresno. 

As SJVAPCD monitoring staff continued to perform required operational checks on the 

BAM, the measurement differences between the two sites decreased. However, it was 

not until 2014 when additional technical adjustments consistent with BAM operational 

protocols were made, and parallel Federal Reference Method (FRM) monitoring was 

conducted for verification of measured levels, that measured concentrations from the 

BAM began to reflect the spatial and temporal variation characteristic of the Valley. 

The analysis presented below indicates that 2011 data collected at Madera were not 

representative of air quality in the area. Nevertheless, use of these data in the 

attainment demonstration, coupled with data presented in the weight of evidence 

document, shows attainment of the 15 μg/m3 annual PM2.5 standard by 2020. 

PM2.5 FEM BAMs in the Monitoring Network

The BAM instruments play an important role in California’s monitoring program because 

they collect continuous data and they are less resource intensive to operate. In many 

applications throughout the State, the BAM measurements have been found to be 

higher than FRM monitors run in parallel, especially when low concentrations are 

anticipated. Recognizing the potential issues with comparability of PM2.5 BAM data to 

filter-based FRM monitor data, U.S. EPA provided flexibility in how these data are used 

in determining compliance with National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). The 

U.S. EPA enables each agency to specify if they intend to use data from PM2.5 FEM 

A2-1
BAMs for comparison to the NAAQS. U.S. EPA has previously approved requests to 

exclude FEM BAMs for use in establishing compliance with the NAAQS in both, the 

South Coast and San Diego. However, this type of request requires parallel FRM/FEM 

monitoring, which was not available at Madera in 2011. 

Comparison of PM2.5 FEM BAM at Madera and PM2.5 FRM at Fresno for 2011

Figure 1 shows the location of PM2.5 monitors in the San Joaquin Valley. Multiple 

years of PM2.5 data indicate that concentrations have a distinct spatial pattern, 

increasing from the northern portion to the southern portion of the Valley. Figure 2 

illustrates trends in the design value for the three regions in the Valley. The two central 

Valley monitoring sites with FEM BAMs, Clovis and Madera, are not included in 

Figure 2, since readings from these two sites altered previously established FRM-based 

concentration gradients. Since 2005, the basin design value came from sites in the 

southern portion of the Valley. Based on this established spatial gradient, we expect 

concentrations at Madera to be higher than at Merced, but lower than at Fresno. In 

2013 Madera had the highest annual design value in the basin.

Figure 1. San Joaquin Valley PM2.5 Monitoring Locations

A2-2
Comparison of 2011 Madera BAM data and Fresno FRM data revealed that PM2.5 

concentrations at Madera were significantly higher compared to the FRM at Fresno. 

Table 1 and Figure 3 compare the data for two sites. Concentrations at the two sites 

correlated well, with a correlation coefficient of 0.94. This correlation suggests that the 

concentrations at both sites are driven by regional meteorological phenomena. 

However, the 2011 Madera and Fresno averages, based on matching data, were 

20.9 μg/m3 and 16.1 μg/m3, respectively. During the low season the difference was 

further magnified, with Madera concentrations on average twice the level of Fresno. 

The very high intercept of more than 9.4 μg/m3 suggests a bias in the FEM BAM 

reading at Madera. 

Table 1. Comparison of PM2.5 FRM Concentrations at Fresno to PM2.5 FEM BAM 

Concentrations at Madera for 2011

FRM FEM Count Slope Intercept Correlation (r)

Fresno-1st

Average: 16.1 μg/m3

Madera

Average:20.9 μg/m3 340 0.71 9.42 0.94

0

5

10

15

20

25

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013

Concentrations (ug/m3)

Figure 2. Gradient in PM2.5 Design Values Among Different Regions in the SJV

*Madera and Clovis BAM values excluded 

North

Central

South

A2-3
Low Season BAM Data Significantly Impacted by Sampling Artifacts

PM2.5 concentrations in the Valley exhibit a pronounced seasonal pattern with high 

concentrations during winter and low concentrations the rest of the year. During the 

2011 low season, PM2.5 concentrations at Madera were significantly higher than the 

rest of the sites in the Valley. As illustrated in Figure 4 and Table 2, the Madera BAM 

concentrations were twice the level of the closest FRM, located in Fresno. 

y = 0.7108x + 9.4194 R2 = 0.8869

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

0 20 40 60 80 100

Madera 24 hr Avg FEM BAM (ug/m3)

Fresno 24-hr Avg FRM (ug/m3)

Figure 3. Comparability of Madera FEM BAM and 

Fresno FRM 

A2-4
Table 2. Difference in Measured Concentrations between Madera and Fresno

Site Name (units) 2011 2012 2013

Madera (μg/m3) 16.1 14.8 13.9

Fresno (μg/m3) 8.1 9.0 8.4

[Madera] – [Fresno] (μg/m3) 8 6 5

[Madera] – [Fresno] 

(as % of Fresno conc.) 100 63 65

The BAM sampling artifact at the Madera site is further illustrated by the number of days 

with low PM2.5 concentrations. Typically, half of the samples annually have 

concentrations less than 10 μg/m3

. In 2011, as shown in Table 3, over half of the 

samples collected at Fresno were below 10 μg/m3, but only 7 percent of samples at 

Madera were below that level. 

Table 3. Percent of Samples with PM2.5 concentrations below 10 μg/m3

Year Madera Fresno

2011 7 52

2012 22 48

2013 16 46

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

PM2.5 Concentrations (ug/m3)

Figure 4. 2011 Average for Q2 and Q3

Red – FEM

Blue – FRM

A2-5
Zero Adjustment Impact on BAM Readings at Madera

An annual background zero test is conducted on PM2.5 FEM BAMs to establish the 

value of any adjustment that may be needed due to a bias in measurement, including 

beta-source fluctuations, mechanically induced bias, and site-specific interferences 

such as radio frequencies or other electromagnetic perturbations. The zero adjustment 

test on the FEM monitor at Madera was initially conducted using internal air. In April of 

2014, the instrument was, for the first time, adjusted using external air. Following this 

adjustment, low season concentrations shifted downward compared to the previous 

years (Figure 8) and are more consistent with other monitors in the Valley (Figure 9). 

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Concentrations (ug/m3)

Figure 8. Comparison of Monthly Average 

PM2.5 Concentrations at Madera

2011

2012

2013

2014

A2-6
Figure 10 shows average concentrations based on 2014 data. The sites are organized 

based on their latitude, from north to south to illustrate that the concentration gradient is 

consistent with location. Figure 11 shows that in 2014 Madera is no longer the highest 

site in the basin or the highest site in the central portion of the Valley, and the spatial 

gradient is now consistent with past data patterns. 

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Concentrations (ug/m3)

Figure 9. Comparison of 2014 Monthly Average PM2.5

Fresno-Garland

Madera

Merced-S Coffee

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

Concentrations (ug/m3)

Figure 10. Average BAM Concentrations in 2014

A2-7
Parallel FRM Monitoring at Madera

To further understand the data collected at Madera, in July of 2014, an FRM sampler 

was deployed to run in parallel with the BAM at the Madera site. These parallel data 

show that after the shift in concentrations in late April/early May, the BAM monitor is 

now reporting concentrations consistent with the FRM. The parallel FRM/BAM data for 

July through September 2014 indicates the BAM is running about 7 percent or 

0.6 μg/m3 higher. The average BAM concentrations for July through September were 

8.9 μg/m3

, which is about 50 percent lower compared to what Madera measured in 

previous years (Figure 12) and is more consistent with what other sites are measuring 

during these three months (Figure 13).

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

North Central South

Concentrations (ug/m3)

Figure 11. Gradient in Concentrations Based on 2014 BAM data

Region

Madera

A2-8
Conclusions

2011 PM2.5 FEM BAM data at Madera appear to be biased high due to sampling 

artifacts. While these data are not representative of air quality in the central portion of 

the Valley, staff has nevertheless included them in the attainment demonstration. In 

2014 a PM2.5 FRM was deployed at Madera to run in parallel with the FEM BAM to 

help verify measured concentrations. It is expected that this parallel monitoring, along 

with the proper sampler maintenance and operation, will lead to future design values 

that are representative of air quality in the region. As listed in Table 4, the 2014 annual 

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

2010 2013 2011 2012 2014 BAM 2014 FRM

Concentrations (ug/m3)

Figure 12. Average July through September 

Concentrations in Madera

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

Merced-M St. Merced-Coffee Madera Fresno

Concentrations (ug/m3)

Figure 13. Comparison of July through September Average PM2.5

2011-2013

2014 BAM

2014 FRM

A2-9
design value is already 2.1 μg/m3 lower compared to 2013. Since the 2011 annual 

average will no longer be included in the calculation, we anticipate that the 2015 design 

value will be lower and the Madera site will continue to make progress towards 

attainment.

Table 4. Annual Average and Design Values for Madera

Annual Average (μg/m3) Annual DV (μg/m3)

2011 2012 2013 2014 2013 2014

20.4 16 17.8 14.1 18.1 16.0

A2-10
SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY PM2.5 WEIGHT OF EVIDENCE ANALYSIS

APPENDIX A3

PM2.5 SOURCE APPORTIONMENT FOR 

THE SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY AIR BASIN USING 

THE CHEMICAL MASS BALANCE RECEPTOR MODEL
PM2.5 Source Apportionment for the San Joaquin Valley Air Basin Using the 

Chemical Mass Balance Receptor Model

1) Data Collection and Screening

PM2.5 chemical composition data collected at the Bakersfield-California and 

Fresno-1st Street sites were used for the Chemical Mass Balance (CMB) analysis. The 

two sites are part of the Chemical Speciation Network (CSN) and use the SASS (Spiral 

Aerosol Speciation Sampler, Met One, Grants Pass, OR.) for data collection. The 

Bakersfield-California and Fresno-1st samplers are configured with several channels, 

each channel containing one 47mmfilter with a 6.7 L/min flow rate. One channel 

contains a Whatman Teflon®-membrane filter for mass by gravimetry and elements by 

XRF. Another channel includes a magnesium oxide-coated aluminum (Al) honeycomb 

after the cyclone followed by a Nylasorb nylon-membrane filter for water-soluble anions 

i.e., NO3

− and SO4=

) and cations (i.e., ammonium [NH4

+

] and water-soluble sodium [Na+] 

and potassium [K+

]) by IC. In the past, another channel containing a Whatman QMA 

quartz-fiber filter was used for OC and EC analysis by the STN thermal/optical 

transmittance (TOT) protocol. In recent years changes were made to the carbon 

sampling and analysis method. The collection method changed from the MetOne SASS 

to the URG3000N sampler, which is very similar to the IMPROVE module C sampler. 

The analytical method was changed from the NIOSH-like thermal optical transmittance 

(TOT) method to IMPROVE_A thermal optical reflectance (TOR). A new backup quartz 

filter is also collected using the URG3000N to help assess artifacts. The backup filter is 

placed behind the routine quartz sampler filter. This change took place on May 3, 2007 

at Bakersfield and April 1, 2009 at Fresno. 

Due to the change in carbon collection and analysis method, several data sets were 

generated for CMB modeling to allow separate analysis of old and new carbon data. 

Throughout this document we will refer to ‘old carbon’ data and ‘new carbon’ data. Old 

carbon data were collected using the SASS sampler and analyzed using the NIOSH-like 

thermal optical transmittance (TOT) method. New carbon data were collected using the 

modified IMPROVE version II Module C sampler, the URG3000N, and analyzed using 

the IMPROVE-A thermal optical reflectance (TOR) method. Both old and new carbon 

data were corrected for sampling artifacts prior to running CMB. 

A3-1
2) Data Preparation

Organic carbon (OC) data were corrected for sampling artifacts prior to running CMB. 

Old carbon data, collected using the SASS sampler and analyzed using the NIOSH-like 

thermal optical transmittance (TOT) method, were corrected by subtracting a California 

network-wide average organic carbon blank of 1 ug/m3 from the measured OC 

concentration. New carbon data were adjusted by subtracting network-wide monthly 

average concentrations measured on a backup filter from daily measurements of 

organic carbon [88370]. The monthly average backup concentrations are shown in 

Table 1.

Table 1. Organic Carbon Monthly Average Concentrations on Backup Filter

Month 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

Avg Blank Value (ug/m3) 0.66 0.54 0.48 0.43 0.43 0.48 0.54 0.49 0.53 0.50 0.60 0.57

3) Source Profiles

The major source types which have been found to contribute to primary PM2.5 in the 

San Joaquin Valley are motor vehicle exhaust, vegetative burning, geological material, 

marine-derived aerosols, residual or crude oil combustion, and tire and brake wear. 

Most of the source profiles applicable to the San Joaquin Valley were determined during 

the California Regional PM10/PM2.5 Air Quality Study (CRPAQS) or earlier. Therefore, 

the profiles used in this analysis, listed in Table 4, are the same profiles that were used 

in the previous analysis for the 2008 San Joaquin Valley PM2.5 Plan.

Motor vehicle profiles for diesel (DIES) and gasoline (GAS) (Fujita et al., 2005) were 

used in modeling PM2.5 concentrations. Since more specific organic markers for 

gasoline and diesel were not available at the receptor site, the two profiles were 

collinear and had to be combined into a single profile representing motor vehicle 

emissions. Diesel and gasoline vehicle emissions source profiles were combined in 

proportions equivalent to their county-level contributions to the PM2.5 emissions to 

produce a single emission-weighted overall source profile. Table 2 lists PM2.5 

emissions (EMFAC 2011, July 2011) that were used as a basis for creating 

county-based composite profiles for Bakersfield and Fresno.

Table 2. Average 2004-2010 PM2.5 Exhaust Emissions (tons per day)

County Gasoline Vehicles Diesel Vehicles

Kern County 2004-2006 (K6GASDIE) 0.12 2.54

2008-2010 (K9GASDIE) 0.09 1.88

Fresno County 2004-2006 (F6GASDIE) 0.12 1.33

2008-2010 (F9GASDIE) 0.08 0.97

A3-2
Table 4. Source Profiles (as Percent of the PM2.5 Mass) Used in the CMB Modeling

PNO 38 35 13 18 41 54 32

SOURCE AMNIT AMSUL WBOakEuc AgBWheat OC MARINE75 TireBrke

N3IC 77.50 ± 7.75 0.00 ± 0.00 0.57 ± 0.07 0.16 ± 0.02 0.00 ± 0.00 22.88 ± 2.60 0.19 ± 1.14

S4IC 0.00 ± 0.00 72.70 ± 7.27 1.30 ± 0.83 0.44 ± 0.04 0.00 ± 0.00 7.20 ± 0.82 0.78 ± 2.10

N4CC 22.55 ± 2.26 27.30 ± 2.73 0.58 ± 0.47 0.59 ± 0.04 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.10 0.16 ± 0.73

NAAC 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.38 ± 0.15 0.54 ± 0.04 0.00 ± 0.00 28.80 ± 3.27 0.10 ± 0.42

KPAC 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 2.89 ± 0.45 6.79 ± 0.50 0.00 ± 0.00 1.07 ± 0.12 0.05 ± 0.17

OCTC 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 59.58 ± 4.75 57.03 ± 4.54 100.00 ± 10.00 0.00 ± 0.10 18.81 ± 24.53

ECTC 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 5.20 ± 1.12 10.31 ± 0.85 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.10 4.55 ± 5.99

ALXC 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.07 ± 0.05 0.07 ± 0.01 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.32 ± 1.89

SIXC 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.22 ± 0.10 0.13 ± 0.01 0.00 ± 0.00 0.01 ± 0.00 0.69 ± 1.81

PHXC 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.01 0.00 ± 0.01 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.05

CLXC 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 1.72 ± 2.02 6.16 ± 0.44 0.00 ± 0.00 38.74 ± 4.40 0.04 ± 0.08

KPXC 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 2.86 ± 0.93 5.50 ± 0.39 0.00 ± 0.00 1.07 ± 0.12 0.10 ± 0.36

CAXC 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.15 ± 0.10 0.10 ± 0.03 0.00 ± 0.00 1.10 ± 0.12 0.28 ± 1.04

TIXC 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.01 ± 0.02 0.01 ± 0.01 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.03 ± 0.38

MNXC 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.01 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.48 ± 0.29

FEXC 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.09 ± 0.06 0.07 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 58.11 ± 31.26

CUXC 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.01 ± 0.00 1.02 ± 0.07 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.16 ± 0.69

ZNXC 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.04 ± 0.02 0.01 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.35 ± 2.37

BRXC 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.03 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.18 ± 0.02 0.00 ± 0.01

RBXC 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.01 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.01 ± 0.01

SRXC 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.02 ± 0.00 0.23 ± 0.66

PBXC 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.06 ± 0.03

VAXC 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00

NIXC 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00

A3-3
Table 4, continued.

PNO 79 80 83 84 66 67 85 86

SOURCE F6GASDIE K6GASDIE F9GASDIE K9GASDIE FDFREANN FDKERANN CHCRUC SFCRUC

N3IC 0.22 ± 1.24 0.16 ± 1.24 0.21 ± 1.24 0.16 ± 1.24 0.02 ± 0.28 0.05 ± 0.16 0.00 ± 0.05 0.00 ± 0.01

S4IC 2.77 ± 7.25 2.60 ± 7.25 2.74 ± 7.25 2.61 ± 7.25 0.56 ± 0.72 0.47 ± 0.29 14.72 ± 6.24 20.32 ± 4.24

N4CC 0.98 ± 3.24 0.89 ± 3.24 0.96 ± 3.24 0.89 ± 3.24 0.04 ± 0.18 0.13 ± 0.20 0.76 ± 0.08 0.01 ± 0.01

NAAC 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.17 ± 0.07 0.26 ± 0.24 0.25 ± 0.06 0.76 ± 0.40

KPAC 0.10 ± 0.08 0.10 ± 0.08 0.10 ± 0.08 0.10 ± 0.08 0.27 ± 0.12 0.80 ± 1.25 0.01 ± 0.01 0.06 ± 0.01

OCTC 43.05 ± 27.33 42.40 ± 27.33 42.93 ± 27.33 42.41 ± 27.33 14.34 ± 8.66 10.29 ± 5.32 1.99 ± 1.33 0.09 ± 0.12

ECTC 50.59 ± 17.73 51.50 ± 17.73 50.75 ± 17.73 51.49 ± 17.73 1.92 ± 1.29 0.69 ± 0.72 3.01 ± 1.12 0.00 ± 0.07

ALXC 0.11 ± 0.14 0.11 ± 0.14 0.11 ± 0.14 0.11 ± 0.14 9.97 ± 2.95 7.67 ± 2.53 0.00 ± 0.05 0.00 ± 0.01

SIXC 1.14 ± 4.12 0.99 ± 4.12 1.11 ± 4.12 0.99 ± 4.12 26.77 ± 9.63 22.05 ± 5.29 0.00 ± 0.08 0.01 ± 0.02

PHXC 0.14 ± 0.51 0.13 ± 0.51 0.14 ± 0.51 0.13 ± 0.51 0.33 ± 0.91 0.33 ± 0.91 0.00 ± 0.57 0.00 ± 0.17

CLXC 0.07 ± 0.30 0.06 ± 0.30 0.07 ± 0.30 0.06 ± 0.30 0.11 ± 0.08 0.46 ± 0.48 0.05 ± 0.01 0.02 ± 0.00

KPXC 0.07 ± 0.08 0.07 ± 0.08 0.07 ± 0.08 0.07 ± 0.08 2.30 ± 0.92 3.26 ± 1.59 0.00 ± 0.00 0.04 ± 0.01

CAXC 0.50 ± 1.42 0.49 ± 1.42 0.50 ± 1.42 0.49 ± 1.42 3.01 ± 0.67 5.54 ± 3.03 0.00 ± 0.03 0.06 ± 0.00

TIXC 0.01 ± 0.08 0.01 ± 0.08 0.01 ± 0.08 0.01 ± 0.08 0.48 ± 0.05 0.44 ± 0.24 0.01 ± 0.00 0.01 ± 0.00

MNXC 0.00 ± 0.01 0.00 ± 0.01 0.00 ± 0.01 0.00 ± 0.01 0.11 ± 0.02 0.11 ± 0.08 0.00 ± 0.00 0.01 ± 0.00

FEXC 0.44 ± 0.44 0.44 ± 0.44 0.44 ± 0.44 0.44 ± 0.44 5.30 ± 0.58 5.09 ± 2.84 0.71 ± 0.09 0.21 ± 0.02

CUXC 0.01 ± 0.05 0.01 ± 0.05 0.01 ± 0.05 0.01 ± 0.05 0.02 ± 0.00 0.01 ± 0.01 0.01 ± 0.01 0.00 ± 0.00

ZNXC 0.27 ± 0.41 0.26 ± 0.41 0.27 ± 0.41 0.26 ± 0.41 0.14 ± 0.08 0.07 ± 0.05 0.01 ± 0.00 0.26 ± 0.03

BRXC 0.03 ± 0.06 0.03 ± 0.06 0.03 ± 0.06 0.03 ± 0.06 0.01 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00

RBXC 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.01 ± 0.00 0.01 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00

SRXC 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.03 ± 0.01 0.03 ± 0.01 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00

PBXC 0.01 ± 0.03 0.01 ± 0.03 0.01 ± 0.03 0.01 ± 0.03 0.18 ± 0.13 0.09 ± 0.32 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00

VAXC 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.42 ± 0.04 0.82 ± 0.06

NIXC 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 0.00 ± 0.00 2.48 ± 0.25 0.79 ± 0.09

A3-4
Biomass burning was represented using an agricultural burning profile (AgBWheat) from 

June through October and a composite residential wood burning profile (WBOakEuc) 

the rest of the year. The agricultural burning profile (AgBWheat) was based on burning 

of wheat stubble (Fitz et al., 2000). The residential wood burning profile (WBOakEuc) 

was used to represent residential wood combustion during colder months and was 

calculated as an average of oak and eucalyptus. 

Geological material in the San Joaquin Valley comes from a variety of sources, 

including roads (paved and unpaved), agricultural operations such as land preparation 

and harvesting, construction, and soil erosion. The Central California Fugitive Dust 

Characterization Study acquired 47 samples from 37 areas (Chow et al., 2003). These 

included: 1) paved road dust from urban and rural areas, 2) unpaved road dust, 

3) agricultural soil from five crop fields (almond, cotton, grape, safflower, and tomato), 

4) dairy and feedlot soil, 5) salt buildup deposits from irrigation canal drainages, and 

6) building construction/earthmoving soil. 

In addition to these latest profiles, some older soil profiles collected in the Valley in the 

late 80's were also used to create composite profiles that best represent fugitive dust 

sources at each site in the San Joaquin Valley. Information on the relative fractions of 

paved and unpaved road dust, as well as agricultural dust, along with information on the 

seasonality of agricultural operations and predominant crop types were used to 

determine which source profiles to include in each composite. Site specific composite 

profiles were then used in the CMB analysis. Table 3 lists geological profiles included in 

the composites created for modeling PM2.5 concentrations. Appendix A includes 

additional information about geological profiles.

Table 3. Geological Composite Source Profiles

Composite Profile ID Sample

ID

% Weight Applicable Area

FDKERANN

SOIL31 25

Bakersfield FDPVR1 25

FDCTF 25

SOIL13 25

FDFREANN

SOIL03 70

Fresno FDALM 10

FDGRA1 10

FDTOM1 10

A3-5
Sea salt was represented using a reacted sea salt profile, MARINE75, in which 25 

percent of the Cl was replaced by nitrate on a molar basis (Chow et al., 1996a).

Tire and brake samples were collected as part of the ‘Development of a Gas and 

Particulate Matter Organic Speciation Profile Database’ conducted by CE-CERT (Fitz et 

al., 2000). Tire and brake samples were composited into a single weighted average 

profile. The two profiles were weighted based on EMFAC 2011 emissions, which 

estimate a 9 to 1 ratio of brake emissions to tire emissions.

Secondary nitrate and sulfate were represented by pure ammonium nitrate (NH4NO3) 

and ammonium sulfate (NH4)2SO4. A “pure” OC profile was used to represent other 

unidentified primary sources, contributions from secondary OC, and the possible 

positive OC sampling artifacts. 

Crude-oil combustion profiles were included to help explain ambient concentrations of 

vanadium (V) and nickel (Ni). The profile representing the Santa Fe crude-oil broiler at 

the Westside Kern County oil field helped to explain vanadium and nickel 

concentrations at Bakersfield, while the crude-oil profile representing the Chevron 

Racetrack boiler at the Kern River oil field provided a better fit at Fresno. 

4) Fitting Species

Table 5 lists fitting species used in CMB runs.

Table 5. CMB Fitting Species

Nitrate Silicon Zinc 

Sulfate Chlorine Bromine

Ammonium Potassium Rubidium 

Soluble Sodium Calcium Strontium 

Soluble Potassium Titanium Lead 

Organic Carbon Manganese Vanadium

Elemental Carbon Iron Nickel

Aluminum Copper

5) Runs

PM2.5 chemical composition data were collected on a one in three days schedule at 

each site. Table 6 shows the number of samples included under each scenario.

Table 6. Number of Samples included in the CMB Runs

Site Old Carbon New Carbon

BAC 157 267

FSF 390 200

A3-6
Data for each sampling day were run individually under several scenarios. Each run 

included the following profiles: ammonium nitrate, ammonium sulfate, motor vehicle, 

fugitive dust, tire and brake wear, marine, and in the case of Bakersfield, crude oil 

combustion. In the case of Fresno, the crude oil combustion profile was included only 

when it was necessary to explain the vanadium and nickel contributions. Biomass 

burning and ‘other OC’ profiles were included as needed. First, all data were run with a 

biomass burning profile (AgBWheat from June through October, WBoakEuc the rest of 

the year) and the ‘other OC’. The results were examined to determine if all source 

contributions were positive and performance parameters were within acceptable ranges. 

If using the biomass burning profile along with the ‘other OC’ gave unsatisfactory 

results, the data were run again using just one of the two profiles, as described below.

1. Run 1 included a biomass burning profile and ‘other OC’.

2. Run 2 included a biomass burning profile but not the ‘other OC’ profile. It was 

geared towards days when primary sources of organic carbon (biomass burning, 

motor vehicle exhaust, and geological material) sufficiently accounted for the 

ambient organic carbon. 

3. Run 3 included ‘other OC’ but no biomass burning profile. It was geared towards 

days with no biomass burning and applied only when soluble potassium 

concentration was reported as zero. 

Data from several runs were combined into a single data file to best represent source 

contributions. Data were combined as follows:

1. Days with estimated positive contributions from wood burning and ‘other OC’ 

were included in the composite file.

2. Days with estimated negative contributions from ‘Other OC’ were treated as 

follows:

a. If there should have been no burning on that day because the soluble 

potassium concentration was zero, run 3 which includes the ‘other OC’ 

and no wood burning was utilized.

b. If there could have been wood burning because the soluble potassium 

concentration was greater than zero, run 2 which includes biomass 

burning was used.

3. Occasionally, the results were still unsatisfactory and profiles were adjusted 

individually for a particular day.

Composite files were used for subsequent analysis. Table 7 shows the number of data 

points from each run included in the composite file.

A3-7
Table 7. Data included in the composite file*.

Site Carbon Run 1 Run2 Run 3 Special Run

Type WBOakEuc AgBWheat

BAC Old 68 41 4 16 5

BAC New 80 113 28 12 0

FSF Old 176 105 7 40 9

FSF New 52 66 21 56 6

* Data with performance measures far exceeding the acceptable criteria were not included in 

the composite

6) Comparison of CMB Estimates using Old and New Carbon

The Bakersfield-California site has 14 days with parallel old and new carbon data. 

Since these data were collected during the low season, the average PM2.5 

concentration was only 13.6 ug/m3. The CMB model was applied to the old and new 

carbon data to evaluate the impact of changing carbon collection and analysis on 

source contribution. Using the old carbon, 10 percent more of the mass was 

apportioned to sources. Regardless of what carbon data were used, the model 

apportioned almost the same concentration to each source, except ‘other OC’. Using 

the old carbon data, on average, 2.5 ug/m3 was assigned to the ‘other OC’. Switching 

to the new carbon data reduced the ‘other OC’ estimate to 1 ug/m3. There were also 

several days when the motor vehicle contribution estimate differed slightly depending on 

which carbon data were used. Even though, on average there is no difference in 

measured EC between the old and new carbon method, on these particular days the 

measurements differed and that difference was reflected in the motor vehicle 

contribution. The new OC measurement is, on average, about 50 percent lower 

compared to the old one. This impacts how much mass gets apportioned to the ‘other 

OC’ but has no impact on motor vehicle or biomass burning contributions. Figures 3 

through 6 compare percent of mass and contribution from major carbon sources using 

old and new carbon data.

A3-8
7) Results

The CMB model was applied to 424 samples at BAC (157 with old carbon and 267 with 

new carbon) and 590 samples at FSF (390 with old carbon and 200 with new). Source 

contribution estimates were averaged to determine a typical contribution. Separately, 

days with concentrations greater than 30 ug/m3 were averaged to determine the typical 

contribution on a high PM2.5 day. 

Performance measures and statistics used to evaluate the validity of CMB source 

apportionments include chi-square, r-square, and percent of mass accounted for by the 

estimated source contributions. The target values for these performance measures are 

chi-square less than 4, r-square greater than 0.8, and percent of mass accounted for by 

the estimated source contributions between 80% and 120%. The average performance 

measures for both sites were within the acceptable limits as shown in Tables 8 and 10.

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

5/3/075/6/07

5/12/075/15/07

6/2/076/5/07

6/11/076/14/076/17/076/20/076/23/076/26/076/29/07

7/5/07

Percent

Figure 3. Compare Percent Mass

Old_% New%

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

5/3/075/6/07

5/12/075/15/07

6/2/076/5/07

6/11/076/14/076/17/076/20/076/23/076/26/076/29/07

7/5/07

Concentration (ug/m3)

Figure 5. Compare Motor Vehicle Estimate

Old_MV New_MV

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

5/3/075/6/07

5/12/075/15/07

6/2/076/5/07

6/11/076/14/076/17/076/20/076/23/076/26/076/29/07

7/5/07

Concentration (ug/m3)

Figure 4. Compare Woodburning Estimate

Old_WB New_WB

0

1

2

3

4

5

5/3/075/6/07

5/12/075/15/07

6/2/076/5/07

6/11/076/14/076/17/076/20/076/23/076/26/076/29/07

7/5/07

Concentration (ug/m3)

Figure 6. Compare 'Other OC' Estimate

Old_OC New_OC

A3-9
The results are discussed separately for each site for two reasons. First of all, each site 

switched to the new method at a different time. Second of all, 2009 had to be excluded 

from the annual average calculation at Bakersfield due to missing data. 

a) Bakersfield (BAC)

The average PM2.5 concentration based on old carbon data for 2006 was 20.5 ug/m3. 

Based on the new carbon data, the 2008 and 2010 average PM2.5 concentration was 

18.6 ug/m3. Between 2006 and 2007 (old carbon data) there were 29 high days with 

chemical composition data. The average PM2.5 concentration on these days was 

47 ug/m3,. Between 2007 and 2010 (new carbon data), there were 36 high days with 

chemical composition data, with the average PM2.5 concentration of 46.7 ug/m3. 

Sources identified by the CMB accounted for 79 to 94 percent on annual basis and 94 

to 95 percent on high days. 

i) Annual

Ammonium nitrate dominated the PM2.5 mass contributing 42 to 47 percent of mass. 

Ammonium sulfate and biomass burning were the next most important sources 

contributing 10 to 12 percent of mass. Biomass burning contributed 9 to 10 to percent 

of the mass. The ‘Other OC’ contribution depended on the carbon data method; using 

old carbon apportioned 16 percent of mass to the ‘other OC’ while using new carbon 

reduced that contribution to 8 percent. Geological material comprised 7 to 10 percent of 

the mass. Each of the remaining sources (tire and brake wear, sea salt, and oil 

combustion) contributed no more than 1 percent of the mass.

ii) High Days

The ammonium nitrate contribution was even more significant on high days, ranging 

from 59 to 67 percent. Biomass burning and motor vehicles each contributed

9 to 13 percent. The ‘Other OC’ contribution ranged from 3 percent using new carbon 

to 10 percent using old carbon. Geological material contributed about 2 percent. Each 

of the remaining sources, tire and brake wear, sea salt, and oil combustion contributed 

less than 1 percent of the mass.

A3-10
b) Fresno (FSF)

The average PM2.5 concentration based on old carbon data for 2006 to 2008 was 

20.3 ug/m3. Based on the new carbon data, the 2010 average PM2.5 concentration 

was 14.2 ug/m3. Between 2006 and 2009 (old carbon data) there were 67 high days 

with chemical composition data. The average PM2.5 concentration on these days was 

46.3 ug/m3. Between 2009 and 2010 (new carbon data), there were 22 high days with 

chemical composition data, with the average concentration of 40.6 ug/m3. Sources 

identified by the CMB accounted for 74 to 97 percent of the mass on an annual basis 

and 82 to 93 percent on high days. 

i) Annual

Ammonium nitrate dominated the PM2.5 mass contributing 40 to 43 percent of the 

mass. Biomass burning contributed about 16 percent of the mass. Motor vehicles 

contributed slightly less, 11 to 13 percent. The ammonium sulfate contribution was 

9 to 11 percent. The ‘Other OC’ contribution, once again, depended on carbon data; 

using old carbon apportioned 18 percent of mass to the ‘other OC’ while using new 

carbon reduced that contribution to 9 percent. Geological material comprised 4 to 6 

percent of the mass. Each of the remaining sources contributed no more than 1 percent 

of the mass.

ii) High Days

The ammonium nitrate contribution was even more significant on high days when 

52 to 54 percent of the mass was ammonium nitrate. Biomass burning was the second 

most significant source, contributing 19 to 23 percent. The motor vehicle contribution 

ranged from 9 to 12 percent. The ‘Other OC’ ranged from 4 percent using new carbon 

data to 13 percent using old carbon data. The remaining sources contributed less than 

1 percent of the mass.

A3-11
Table 8. BAC Source Contribution (ug/m3)

Source Profile Annual Average High Days (>=30 ug/m3)

Name 2006 2008 and 2010 2006-2007 2007-2010

# of samples Obs Count 90 138 29 36

Mconc Mconc 20.5 ± 1.1 18.6 ± 1.0 47.0 ± 2.4 46.7 ± 2.4

Cconc Cconc 19.4 ± 1.5 15.6 ± 1.2 45.0 ± 3.1 43.9 ± 3.1

Rsquare Rsquare 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9

CHIsquare CHIsquare 3.1 2.7 1.8 1.4

%MASS %MASS 94.3 79.3 95.5 93.8

AMNIT AMNIT 8.2 ± 0.8 7.4 ± 0.7 26.7 ± 2.5 29.6 ± 2.5

AMSUL AMSUL 2.0 ± 0.6 1.9 ± 0.5 2.5 ± 1.2 3.4 ± 1.3

Biomass burning Seasonal* 1.9 ± 0.4 1.5 ± 0.3 5.7 ± 1.0 4.0 ± 0.7

Motor Vehicle K9GASDI** 2.4 ± 1.0 1.9 ± 0.6 4.2 ± 1.6 4.2 ± 1.4

OC OC 3.2 ± 1.1 1.2 ± 0.7 4.3 ± 1.7 1.3 ± 1.2

Tire and Brake TireBrk 0.2 ± 0.1 0.2 ± 0.1 0.3 ± 0.2 0.3 ± 0.2

Sea Salt MARINE75 0.1 ± 0.1 0.1 ± 0.1 0.3 ± 0.1 0.2 ± 0.1

Geological FDKERANN 1.3 ± 0.3 1.6 ± 0.3 0.7 ± 0.3 0.8 ± 0.3

Oil Refinery SFCRUC 0.3 ± 0.1 0.1 ± 0.1 0.3 ± 0.3 0.2 ± 0.3

Table 9. BAC Source Contribution (%)

Source Profile Annual Average High Days (>=30 ug/m3)

Name 2006 2008 and 2010 2006-2007 2007-2010

# of samples Obs Count 90 138 29 36

AMNIT AMNIT 42.2 46.8 59.3 67.4

AMSUL AMSUL 10.2 11.9 5.6 7.8

Biomass burning Seasonal* 9.6 9.3 12.8 9.1

Motor Vehicle KGASDI** 12.3 11.8 9.3 9.6

OC OC 16.2 7.7 9.5 2.9

Tire and Brake TireBrk 1.0 1.3 0.7 0.7

Sea Salt MARINE75 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.5

Geological FDKERANN 6.7 10.3 1.6 1.7

Oil Refinery SFCRUC 1.3 0.5 0.6 0.3

* AgBWheat from June through October, WBoakEuc the rest of the year

** K6GASDIE for old carbon and K9GASDIE for new carbon

A3-12
AMNIT

42.2%

AMSUL

10.2%

Sea Salt

0.4%

Motor 

Vehicle

12.3%

Biomass 

burning

9.6%

OC

16.2%

Tire and 

Brake

1.0%

Geological

6.7%

Oil 

Refineries

1.3%

Figure 7. BAC 2006 Average Old Carbon

AMNIT

59.3%

AMSUL

5.6%

Sea Salt

0.6%

Motor 

Vehicle

9.3%

Biomass 

burning

12.8%

OC

9.5%

Tire and 

Brake

0.7%

Geological

1.6%

Oil 

Refineries

0.6%

Figure 9. BAC Average High Day Old Carbon 

(2006-2007)

AMNIT

46.8%

AMSUL

11.9%

Sea Salt

0.5%

Motor 

Vehicle

11.8%

Biomass 

burning

9.3%

OC

7.7%

Tire and 

Brake

1.3%

Geological

10.3%

Oil 

Refineries

0.5%

Figure 8. BAC 2008 and 2010 Average New Carbon

AMNIT

67.4%

AMSUL

7.8%

Sea Salt

0.5%

Motor 

Vehicle

9.6%

Biomass 

burning

9.1%

OC

2.9%

Tire and 

Brake

0.7%

Geological

1.7%

Oil 

Refineries

0.3%

Figure 10. BAC Average High Day

New Carbon (2007-2010)

A3-13
Table 10. FSF Source Contribution (ug/m3)

Source Profile Annual Average High Days (>=30 ug/m3)

Name 2006-2008 2010 2006-2009 2009-2010

# of samples Obs Count 275 105 67 22

Mconc Mconc 20.3 ± 1.1 14.2 ± 0.8 46.3 ± 2.3 40.6 ± 2.1

Cconc Cconc 19.0 ± 1.5 10.8 ± 0.8 43.0 ± 2.9 33.1 ± 2.3

Rsquare Rsquare 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9

CHIsquare CHIsquare 4.3 3.5 1.7 1.4

%MASS %MASS 96.7 74.3 92.9 81.5

AMNIT AMNIT 7.5 ± 0.7 4.7 ± 0.5 22.4 ± 2.1 17.8 ± 1.7

AMSUL AMSUL 1.7 ± 0.5 1.2 ± 0.4 2.1 ± 1.1 2.0 ± 1.0

Biomass burning Seasonal* 3.1 ± 0.5 1.7 ± 0.3 8.0 ± 1.2 7.6 ± 1.1

Motor Vehicle FGASDI** 2.1 ± 0.9 1.4 ± 0.5 4.0 ± 1.5 3.8 ± 1.3

OC OC 3.3 ± 1.1 1.0 ± 0.5 5.7 ± 2.0 1.5 ± 1.3

Tire and Brake TireBrk 0.1 ± 0.1 0.1 ± 0.1 0.2 ± 0.1 0.2 ± 0.1

Sea Salt MARINE75 0.1 ± 0.1 0.1 ± 0.1 0.2 ± 0.2 0.2 ± 0.2

Geological FDFREANN 0.8 ± 0.2 0.6 ± 0.1 0.2 ± 0.2 0.1 ± 0.1

Oil Combustion CHCRUC 0.01 ± 0.0 0.1 ± 0.0 0.0 ± 0.0

Table 11. FSF Source Contribution (%)

Source Profile Annual Average High Days (>=30 ug/m3)

Name 2006-2008 2010 2006-2009 2009-2010

# of samples Obs Count 275 105 67 22

AMNIT AMNIT 40.0 43.2 52.0 53.6

AMSUL AMSUL 9.1 11.4 4.9 6.0

Biomass burning WBOakEuc 16.5 15.7 18.7 22.9

Motor Vehicle F9GASDI 11.1 13.3 9.3 11.5

OC OC 17.5 9.2 13.4 4.4

Tire and Brake TireBrk 0.8 0.8 0.5 0.5

Sea Salt MARINE75 0.6 0.9 0.5 0.7

Geological FDFREANN 4.2 5.6 0.5 0.3

Oil Combustion CHCRUC 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0

* AgBWheat from June through October, WBoakEuc the rest of the year

** F6GASDIE for old carbon and F9GASDIE for new carbon

A3-14
Contributions on individual exceedance days are illustrated in Figures 15 through 18. 

The highest contribution from each source is also summarized in Tables 12 and 13.

AMNIT

40.0%

AMSUL

Sea Salt 9.1%

0.6%

Motor 

Vehicle

11.1%

Biomass 

burning

16.5%

OC

17.6%

Tire and 

Brake

0.8%

Geological

4.2%

Figure 11. FSF 2006-2008 Average Old Carbon

AMNIT

52.7%

AMSUL

4.9%

Sea Salt

0.5%

Motor 

Vehicle

11.8%

Biomass 

burning

24.5%

OC

4.6%

Tire and 

Brake

0.5%

Geological

0.4% Oil 

Refineries

0.1%

Figure 13. FSF Average High Day Old Carbon 

(2006-2009)

AMNIT

43.2%

AMSUL Sea Salt 11.4% 0.9%

Motor 

Vehicle

13.3%

Biomass 

burning

15.7%

OC

9.2%

Tire and 

Brake

0.8%

Geological

5.6%

Figure 12. FSF 2010 Average New Carbon

AMNIT

53.6%

AMSUL

6.0%

Sea Salt

0.7%

Motor 

Vehicle

11.5%

Biomass 

burning

22.9%

OC

4.4%

Tire and 

Brake

0.5%

Geological

0.3%

Figure 14. FSF Average High Day New Carbon 

(2009-2010)

A3-15
0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

1/5/061/8/06

1/11/061/23/06

2/4/062/7/06

2/10/062/13/0610/2/0611/1/0611/7/06

11/16/0611/19/06

12/4/0612/7/06

12/13/0612/25/0612/31/06

1/3/071/9/07

1/18/071/21/071/24/071/27/071/30/07

2/2/072/5/072/8/07

2/17/07

Concentrations (ug/m3)

Figure 15. PM2.5 Source Contribution on High Days 2006-2007

Bakersfield, Old Carbon

Oil Refining

Other OC

Biomass Burning

Motor Vehicle

Ammonium Sulfate

Ammonium Nitrate

Airborne Soil

Tires&Brakes

Sea Salt

PM2.5 Mass

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

10/27/07

11/2/0711/8/07

11/14/0711/26/0711/29/0712/11/0712/14/0712/23/07

1/10/081/13/081/16/081/19/08

2/9/08

2/12/082/18/082/27/08

3/7/08

10/27/08

11/8/08

11/17/0811/20/0811/26/0812/11/08

11/3/09

11/24/0911/27/09

12/3/09

12/21/0912/27/09

1/5/102/4/10

11/4/1012/1/1012/4/10

12/10/10

Concentrations (ug/m3)

Figure 16. PM2.5 Source Contribution on High Days 2007-2010

Bakersfield, New Carbon

Oil Refining

Other OC

Biomass Burning

Motor Vehicle

Ammonium Sulfate

Ammonium Nitrate

Airborne Soil

Tires&Brakes

Sea Salt

PM2.5 Mass

A3-16
0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

1/5/06

1/11/061/17/061/23/06

2/1/06

2/10/062/13/062/22/0610/2/0611/1/06

11/16/0611/22/0611/25/06

12/1/0612/4/0612/7/06

12/13/0612/25/0612/31/06

1/3/071/9/07

1/15/071/18/071/21/071/24/071/27/071/30/07

2/2/072/8/07

2/17/0711/2/0711/5/0711/8/07

11/14/0711/23/0711/26/0711/30/0712/11/0712/14/0712/23/0712/29/07

1/1/08

1/10/081/13/081/16/081/19/08

2/9/08

2/12/082/18/08

3/7/08

11/8/08

11/14/0811/26/0811/29/08

12/5/0812/8/08

12/11/0812/29/08

1/1/091/4/09

1/10/091/13/091/16/091/19/091/22/091/28/091/31/09

Concentrations (ug/m3)

Figure 17. PM2.5 Source Contribution on High Days 2006-2009

Fresno, Old Carbon

Other OC

Biomass Burning

Motor Vehicle

Ammonium Sulfate

Ammonium Nitrate

Airborn Soil

Tires&Brakes

Sea Salt

PM2.5 Mass

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

11/12/0911/15/0911/24/09

12/3/0912/6/0912/9/09

12/21/0912/24/0912/30/09

1/2/101/8/10

1/11/101/15/10

2/4/10

2/19/10

11/13/1011/16/1011/25/10

12/4/1012/7/10

12/10/1012/13/10

Concentrations (ug/m3)

Figure 18. PM2.5 Source Contribution on High Days 2009-2010

Fresno, New Carbon

Other OC

Biomass Burning

Motor Vehicle

Ammonium Sulfate

Ammonium Nitrate

Airborn Soil

Tires&Brakes

Sea Salt

PM2.5 Mass

A3-17
Table 12. BAC Highest Contribution by Source

Source Old Carbon New Carbon

Contribution (ug/m3) Date Contribution (ug/m3) Date

Ammonium Nitrate 60 2/5/07 50 2/12/08

Ammonium Sulfate 5 10/2/06 11 1/5/10

Biomass Burning 18 12/25/06 12 11/29/07

Motor Vehicle 12 12/25/06 7 1/19/08

Other OC 9 2/5/07 5 2/12/08

Tire & Brake 0.6 1/24/07 0.8 12/4/10

Sea Salt 1 11/16/06 0.7 11/26/08

Geological 2.5 11/24/07 2.5 11/8/07

Oil Combustion 1 11/24/07 1 11/8/07

Table 13. FSF Highest Contribution by Source

Source Old Carbon New Carbon

Contribution (ug/m3) Date Contribution (ug/m3) Date

Ammonium Nitrate 50 12/14/07 38 12/4/10

Ammonium Sulfate 5 12/23/07 7 1/8/10

Biomass Burning 21 1/1/08 19 11/25/10

Motor Vehicle 8 12/4/06 8 11/25/10

Other OC 13 1/19/08 6 12/24/09

Tire & Brake 0.6 12/7/06 0.4 11/24/09

Sea Salt 0.6 2/9/08 0.4 12/10/10

Geological 1.4 11/8/07 0.6 12/4/10

Oil Combustion 2 2/8/07

References

Chow, J.C., Watson, J. G., Lowenthal, D. H., and Countess, R. J.: Sources and 

chemistry of PM10 aerosol in Santa Barbara County, CA, Atmospheric Environment, 30, 

1489-1499, 1996.

Chow, J.C., Watson, J.G., Crow, D., Lowenthal, D. H., and Merrifield, T.: Comparison 

of IMPROVE and NIOSH carbon measurements. Aerosol Science and Technology. 

34:23-34, 2001.

Chow, J.C., Watson, J.G., Ashbaugh, L. L., and Magliano, K. L.: Similarities and 

differences in PM10 chemical source profiles for geological dust from the San Joaquin 

Valley, California. Atmospheric Environment. 37 (9-10):1317-1340, 2003.

A3-18
Chow, J. C., Chen, L.-W. A., Lowenthal, D. H., Doriswamy, P., Park, K., Kohl, S., 

Trimble, D. L., and Watson, J. G.: California Regional PM10/PM2.5 Air Quality Study 

(CRPAQS) – Initial data analysis of field program measurements, California Air 

Resources Board, Sacramento, CA, by Desert Research Institute, Reno, NV, 2005.

Fitz, D. R. and Chow, J. C.: Development of gas and particulate matter organic profile 

database – draft work plan. Prepared for the San Joaquin Valleywide Air Pollution 

Study Agency, California Air Resourced Board. Sacramento, CA, by the University of 

California CE-CERT, Riverside, CA, 2001.

Fujita. E. M., Campbell, D., Zielinska, B., and Chow, J. C.: Kansas City PM 

Characterization Study, Round 1 Testing Report – Addendum A, Chemical Speciation, 

prepared for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Desert Research Institute, 

Reno, NV, 2005.

A3-19
Appendix A

Summary of Geological Profiles Used in CMB Modeling

Source Type Subtype County Sample ID Source

FDKERANN

Agricultural Soil Kern Soil 31 Houck, et al, 1989

Paved Road Urban Kern FDPVR1 Central California Fugitive Dust 

Study Animal 

Husbandry

Feedlot 

(Composite)

Kern&Fresno FDCTF

Unpaved Road 

Dust

Unpaved 

Parking lot

Kern Soil 13 Houck, et al, 1989

FDFREANN

Paved Road Fresno Soil 03 Houck, et al, 1989

Agricultural Soil Almonds 

(Composite)

Kern, Fresno, 

King, and 

Madera

FDALM Central California Fugitive Dust 

Study

Agricultural Soil Grapes Fresno FDGRA1

Agricultural Soil Tomato 

(Composite)

Fresno FDTOM1

A3-20
SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY PM2.5 WEIGHT OF EVIDENCE ANALYSIS

APPENDIX A4

SOURCE APPORTIONMENT OF PM2.5 MEASURED AT THE FRESNO 

AND BAKERSFIELD CHEMICAL SPECIATION NETWORK SITES IN 

SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY USING 

THE POSITIVE MATRIX FACTORIZATION MODEL
Source Apportionment of PM2.5 Measured at the Fresno and 

Bakersfield Chemical Speciation Network Sites in San Joaquin Valley 

Using the Positive Matrix Factorization Model

Sample Collection and Data Screening

PM2.5 chemical speciation samples were collected on a one-in-three day schedule at the 

Fresno-First St. and Bakersfield-California Ave. Chemical Speciation Network (CSN) 

monitoring sites located in the San Joaquin Valley (SJV). There were good agreements 

between PM2.5 data collected by the speciation samplers and the collocated Federal 

Reference Method (FRM) samplers in matched Fresno data (340 samples, slope = 

1.00, Intercept = 1.08, r

2 = 0.97) and Bakersfield (175 samples, slope = 0.94, Intercept

= 0.92, r

2 = 0.94) between 2008 and 2010.

The Thermal Optical Transmittance (TOT) protocol had been used to analyze carbon 

mass collected on the quartz filters. This method was changed to the Thermal Optical 

Reflectance (TOR) protocol and TOR organic carbon (OC) and elemental carbon (EC) 

concentrations were available starting from January 2008 and April 2009 at the 

Bakersfield and Fresno monitoring sites, respectively. Only the speciation data for 

which TOR OC and EC concentrations were available were considered in this source 

apportionment study.

Since a carbon denuder that minimizes the positive sampling artifact caused by 

adsorption of gaseous organic materials was not included upstream of quartz filter in the 

CSN samplers, and none of the reported CSN data were blank corrected, an integrated 

OC artifact concentration that includes OC adsorption and desorption was estimated 

utilizing the intercept of the regression of OC concentrations against PM2.5 mass 

concentrations (Tolocka et al. 2001, Kim et al. 2005). Samples for which PM2.5 or OC 

concentrations had an error flag and samples for which the PM2.5 or OC data were not 

available were excluded from the regression analysis between PM2.5 and OC 

concentrations. Comparing co-located PM2.5 data measured by CSN and FRM 

samplers, and comparing PM2.5 and Sulfur (S) concentrations, outliers were censored 

for the two data sets. Using 189 data points out of 353 data points between 2009 and 

2010 at Fresno and 187 data points out of 192 data points at Bakersfield between 2008 

and 2010, the intercept s of 0.576 μg/m3 and 1.480 μg/m3 in PM2.5 regression against 

OC concentrations are considered to be the integrated OC artifact concentrations at 

Fresno and Bakersfield, respectively (Figure 1). The OC concentrations analyzed in 

this study were corrected by subtracting the integrated OC artifact concentrations.

A4-1
Fresno-First St.

Bakersfield-California Ave.

Figure 1. OC artifact estimations: PM2.5 concentrations versus OC concentrations.

A4-2
The Positive matrix factorization model version 2 (PMF2) model was used for the 

source apportionment of PM2.5 at the Fresno and Bakersfield monitoring sites. Samples 

were excluded from the data set for which the PM2.5, artifact corrected OC, or EC data 

were not available or below zero, or for which PM2.5 artifact corrected OC, or EC had an 

error flag. Samples for which the sum of all measured species were larger than twice 

the PM2.5 concentrations or the sum of all measured species were less than 50% of 

PM2.5 concentrations were also excluded. Finally, samples that contain fireworks 

particles collected on Independence Day and New Year’s Day were excluded since they 

had unusually high concentrations of OC, EC, K+

, Na+ and metals. Overall, 10.3% of 

the Fresno data and 16.5% of the Bakersfield data were excluded in this study.

For the chemical species screening, X-Ray Fluorescence (XRF) S was excluded from 

the analyses to prevent double counting of mass concentrations. Due to the higher 

analytical precision compared to XRF Na and XRF K, IC Na+ and IC K+ were included in 

the analyses. Chemical species below MDL values more than 90% were excluded. As 

recommended by Paatero and Hopke (2003), the species that had a Signal-to-Noise 

(S/N) ratio below 0.2 were excluded. Thus, a total of 174 samples and 21 species 

including PM2.5 mass concentrations collected between April 2009 and December 2010 

were used for the Fresno site. For the Bakersfield site, a total of 147 samples and 24 

species including PM2.5 mass concentrations collected between January 2008 and 

December 2010 were used. Since new TOR OC and EC concentrations were not 

accompanied by detection limit and uncertainty values, a comprehensive set of 

uncertainty structure (i.e., 7% of measured concentration) estimated by Kim et al. 

(2005) and 0.1 μg/m3 of detection limit value estimated from the State and Local Air 

Monitoring Stations (SLAM) speciation data were used in this study. Summaries of 

PM2.5 speciation data are provided in Tables A1 and A2 in the Appendix.

The procedure of Polissar et al. (1998) was used to assign input data for PMF2. The 

measurement values are used for the input concentration data, and the sum of the 

analytical uncertainty and one-third of the detection limit value is used as the input 

uncertainty data assigned to each measured value. Concentration values below the 

detection limit are replaced by half of the detection limit values, and their input 

uncertainties are set at five-sixth of the detection limit values. Missing values are 

replaced by the geometric mean of the measured values for each species. To downweight these replaced data and then to reduce their influence on the solution, their 

accompanying uncertainties are set at four times the geometric mean value. The 

conditional probability function (CPF) analysis was used to estimate the possible 

directions of the local source impacts (Kim and Hopke, 2004). The CPF was calculated 

for each source using the PMF2 source contributions coupled with wind data. As 

recommended by Paatero and Hopke (2003), which is to down-weight the variable in 

the analysis so that the noise does not compromise the solution, it was found necessary 

to increase the input uncertainties of OC, EC, and Cl by a factor of 3 for the Fresno data 

and OC and Na+ by a factor of 3 for the Bakersfield data to obtain physically 

interpretable PMF2 results.

A4-3
PMF Results

Seven major sources were resolved from PMF2 analyses for both sites (matrix 

rotational parameter: Fresno FPEAK = 0.1; Bakersfield FPEAK = 0). The comparison of 

the reconstructed PM2.5 contributions (sum of contributions from all sources) with 

measured PM2.5 concentrations shown in Figure 2 indicates that the resolved sources 

effectively reproduce the measured values and account for most of the variation in the 

PM2.5 concentrations (slope = 0.88, r

2 = 0.95 for Fresno data; slope = 0.93, r2 = 0.91 for 

Bakersfield data).

Average Source Contributions

As shown in Figure 3 and Table A3 which present average source contributions, 

secondary nitrate contributed the most at both sites (35% at the Fresno site, 41% at the 

Bakersfield site). The pie charts indicate that three major sources (i.e., secondary 

nitrate, secondary sulfate, and motor vehicle) contributed 74% of PM2.5 concentrations 

at both sites. Figure 4 shows monthly average source contributions. Secondary nitrate, 

motor vehicle, and biomass smoke contributed the most in winter. The source profiles, 

corresponding source contributions, weekday/weekend variations, monthly averaged 

source contributions, and potential source directions are presented in Figures A1 

through A10 in the Appendix.

The secondary nitrate factor was identified by its high concentration of NO3

- and NH4+

. 

It consisted of NH4NO3 and several minor species such as secondary OC and EC that 

transport together. It contributed the most at both sites, accounting for 35% and 41% of 

the PM2.5 mass concentrations at Fresno and Bakersfield, respectively. Bakersfield 

showed higher secondary nitrate concentrations than Fresno. Secondary nitrate 

particles had winter- high trends at both sites. Secondary sulfate was identified by its 

high concentration of SO4

2- and NH4+ and accounted for 27% and 20% of the PM2.5

mass concentration at Fresno and Bakersfield, respectively. Secondary nitrate and 

secondary sulfate did not show clear weekday/weekend variations. Secondary sulfate 

showed seasonal variations with higher concentrations in summer when the 

photochemical activity was highest at both sites. The CPF plots for secondary nitrate 

pointed S and NE at both sites. The CPF plots for secondary sulfate pointed SE at the 

Fresno site and SW at the Bakersfield site.

The motor vehicle factor was identified by its high concentration of OC, EC, NO3

-

, and 

minor species such as Fe (Watson et al., 1994). Motor vehicle emissions contributed

12% and 13% of the PM2.5 mass concentrations at Fresno and Bakersfield, respectively. 

Motor vehicle emissions did not show clear weekday/weekend variations at either site, 

however there was a winter-high seasonal trend.

A4-4
The biomass smoke factor was characterized by OC, EC, and K+ (Watson et al., 2001) 

and contributed 11% and 10% to the PM2.5 mass concentrations at Fresno and 

Bakersfield, respectively. The biomass smoke category reflects contributions from 

residential wood burning and smoke from commercial cooking. The biomass smoke did 

not show weekday/weekend variations. The biomass smoke did show winter-high 

trends suggesting that it was mostly contributed by residential wood burning. The CPF 

plots for the biomass smoke pointed to high contributions from NE and S at both sites.

A4-5
 Fresno-First St.

 Bakersfield-California Ave.

Figure 2. Measured versus PMF predicted PM2.5 mass concentrations.

A4-6
 

Figure 3. Average source contributions.

Figure 4. Monthly average source contributions.

A4-7
The airborne soil factor was identified by its high concentrations of Si, Al, Ca and Fe. It 

contributed 7% and 10% to the PM2.5 mass concentration at Fresno and Bakersfield, 

respectively. Airborne soil reflects wind-blown dust as well as re-suspended crustal 

materials by road traffic as indicated by the presence of OC or EC in the source profiles. 

Airborne soil did not show clear weekday/weekend variation. Both sites exhibited 

autumn-high seasonal trends. The CPF plots for airborne soil suggested high 

contributions from SW and S at both sites.

The aged sea salt factor was represented by its high concentrations of NO3

-

, SO4

2-

, and 

Na+, accounting for 6% the PM2.5 mass concentration at Fresno and 4% at Bakersfield. 

Aged sea salt reflects particles in which Cl- in the fresh sea salt is partially displaced by 

acidic gases during the transport and collected along with NO3

- and SO42- (Song and 

Carmichael, 1999). Aged sea salt did not show weekday/weekend variation at either 

site. Aged sea salt had high contributions in summer at the Fresno site. Interestingly, it 

had a high contribution in winter at the Bakersfield site. The CPF plot for aged sea salt 

at Fresno site pointed towards NE. The CPF plot for aged sea salt at Bakersfield site 

suggested high contributions from NE and S.

A possible industrial source such as metal processing that was characterized by OC, 

EC, Fe, and Zn was identified at both sites. This source accounted for 2% of the PM2.5

mass concentrations at both sites. It showed weak weekday-high variations at the 

Bakersfield site. The industrial source showed winter-high variations at the Fresno site. 

The CPF plot suggested high contributions from NE and SW at both sites.

 

Figure 5. Average source contributions in Fresno – First St. and Bakersfield – California 

Ave. when PM2.5 concentrations were higher than 30 μg/m3 in the high PM2.5 season 

(Nov. - Feb.).

A4-8
Higher PM2.5 Day Contributions

The average source contributions when PM2.5 concentrations were higher than 

30 μg/m3 in the high PM2.5 season (Nov. - Feb.) are shown in Figure 5 for percentiles 

and in Table A4 for mass concentrations. The contributions from secondary nitrate and 

motor vehicle were increased from 35% up to 54% and from 12% up to 23%, 

respectively, at the Fresno site. The biomass burning contributions also increased 

slightly from 11% up to 13% at Fresno site. At the Bakersfield site, the contributions 

from secondary nitrate increased from 41% up to 64% and aged sea salt from 4% up to 

6%.

Conclusions

PM2.5 speciation and related meteorological data collected at the Fresno-First St. and 

Bakersfield-California Ave. CSN monitoring sites between 2008 and 2010 were 

analyzed by PMF2. Seven major PM2.5 sources were identified at both monitoring sites: 

secondary nitrate, secondary sulfate, motor vehicle, biomass smoke, airborne soil, aged 

sea salt, and industrial. Annual average and high day source contributions showed that 

secondary nitrate, secondary sulfate, motor vehicles, and biomass burning were the 

largest contributors to PM2.5 concentrations. 

References

Kim, E., Hopke, P.K. Comparison between conditional probability function and 

nonparametric regression for fine particle source directions, Atmospheric 

Environment 38, 11, 4667-4673, 2004.

Kim, E., Hopke, P.K. and Qin, Y. Estimation of organic carbon blank values and error 

structures of the speciation trends network data for source apportionments, 

Journal of Air and Waste Management Association 55, 1190–1199, 2005.

Paatero, P., Hopke, P.K. Discarding or downweighting high-noise variables in factor 

analytic models, Analytica Chimica Acta, 490, 277-289, 2003.

Polissar, A.V., Hopke, P.K., Paatero, P., Malm, W.C. and Sisler, J.F. Atmospheric 

Aerosol over Alaska 2. Elemental Composition and Sources, Journal of 

Geophysical Research, 103, 19045-19057, 1998.

Song, C.H., Carmichael, G.R. The aging process of naturally emitted aerosol (sea salt 

and mineral aerosol) during long-range transport, Atmospheric Environment 33, 

2203-2218, 1999.

A4-9
Tolocka, M.P., Solomon, P.A., Mitchell, W., Norris, G.A., Gemmill, D.B., Wiener, R.W., 

Vanderpool, R.W., Homolya, J.B. and Rice, J.East versus west in the US: 

Chemical characteristics of PM2.5 during the winter of 1999, Aerosol Science 

and Technology 34, 88-96, 1999.

Watson, J.G., Chow, J.C., Lowenthal, D.H., Pritchett, L.C. and Frazier, C.A. Differences 

in the carbon composition of source profiles for diesel and gasoline powered 

vehicles, Atmospheric Environment 28(15), 2493-2505, 1994.

Watson, J.G., J.C. Chow, and J.E. Houck, PM2.5 chemical source profiles for vehicle 

exhaust, vegetative burning, geological material, and coal burning in 

northwestern Colorado during 1995, Chemosphere, 43, 1141-1151, 2001.

A4-10
APPENDIX

Table A1. Summary of PM2.5 species mass concentrations at Fresno.

Species

Arithmetic 

mean 

(μg/m3)

Geometric 

mean 

(μg/m3)

Minimum 

(μg/m3)

Maximum 

(μg/m3)

Number of 

below MDL 

values (%)

PM2.5 14.5649 11.2762 0.3000 66.6000 0.6

OC 2.7861 1.9428 0.1600 17.4240 0.0

EC 0.7934 0.5764 0.0769 5.0400 0.6

SO4 1.2507 1.1155 0.2440 5.3900 0.6

NO3- 3.6499 1.9445 0.0445 29.1000 0

NH4

+ 1.3964 0.8936 0.1380 9.3500 0.6

Al 0.0646 0.0418 0.0013 0.6330 25.3

Br 0.0042 0.0032 0.0001 0.0338 15.5

Ca 0.0420 0.0310 0.0027 0.2860 4.0

Cl 0.0563 0.0156 0.0001 0.5130 40.2

Cr 0.0026 0.0018 0.0000 0.0387 75.3

Cu 0.0044 0.0032 0.0001 0.0163 28.7

Fe 0.1007 0.0843 0.0129 0.6890 0

K+ 0.1072 0.0770 0.0169 0.6460 32.8

Mg 0.0200 0.0138 0.0002 0.1140 68.4

Mn 0.0019 0.0015 0.0000 0.0126 62.1

Na+ 0.1373 0.0972 0.0176 0.8720 3.4

Ni 0.0074 0.0017 0.0000 0.1850 65.5

Si 0.1682 0.1100 0.0006 1.6400 1.7

Ti 0.0057 0.0043 0.0001 0.0448 61.5

Zn 0.0067 0.0045 0.0004 0.0296 25.3

A4-11
Table A2. Summary of PM2.5 species mass concentrations at Bakersfield.

Species

Arithmetic 

mean 

(μg/m3)

Geometric 

mean 

(μg/m3)

Minimum 

(μg/m3

)

Maximum 

(μg/m3)

Number of 

below MDL 

values (%)

PM2.5 20.9253 17.1631 2.9000 73.3000 0

OC 2.4981 1.7591 0.0400 18.2200 1.3

EC 1.1390 0.9764 0.2160 3.0900 0

SO4 1.6927 1.4718 0.1200 8.0600 0

NO3- 6.4908 3.2626 0.3520 35.7000 0

NH4

+ 2.5874 1.5187 0.3160 14.8000 0.7

Al 0.1276 0.0818 0.0013 1.0800 12.7

As 0.0015 0.0013 0.0001 0.0056 73.3

Br 0.0058 0.0048 0.0001 0.0299 4.7

Ca 0.1096 0.0791 0.0065 0.6770 1.3

Cl 0.0436 0.0192 0.0002 0.3270 26.0

Co 0.0013 0.0010 0.0000 0.0047 76.0

Cr 0.0021 0.0016 0.0001 0.0156 80.0

Cu 0.0089 0.0064 0.0002 0.0570 10.0

Fe 0.1923 0.1555 0.0020 1.0900 0

K+ 0.1091 0.0931 0.0183 0.5280 16.0

Mg 0.0238 0.0160 0.0002 0.2310 60.7

Mn 0.0034 0.0025 0.0003 0.0276 32.7

Na+ 0.1556 0.1229 0.0168 0.6980 1.3

Ni 0.0010 0.0009 0.0000 0.0042 84.7

Si 0.3586 0.2322 0.0217 3.4300 0.7

Sr 0.0019 0.0017 0.0001 0.0120 84.0

Ti 0.0103 0.0068 0.0001 0.0818 46.7

Zn 0.0127 0.0084 0.0006 0.1300 8.7

A4-12
Table A3. Average source contributions (μg/m3

) to PM2.5 mass concentration.

Sources

Average source contribution (± 95 % distribution)

Fresno Bakersfield

Secondary nitrate 4.89 (1.09) 8.07 (1.85)

Secondary sulfate 1.72 (0.16) 2.60 (0.39)

Motor vehicle 3.70 (0.44) 4.01 (0.39)

Biomass smoke 1.47 (0.28) 2.02 (0.28)

Airborne soil 0.83 (0.14) 1.97 (0.37)

Aged sea salt 1.04 (0.16) 0.79 (0.22)

Industrial 0.22 (0.03) 0.40 (0.11)

Estimated PM2.5 (μg/m3) 13.86 (1.57) 19.85 (2.27)

Measured PM2.5 (μg/m3) 14.56 (1.74) 20.48 (2.33)

A4-13
Table A4. Average source contributions (μg/m3

) to PM2.5 mass concentration at FresnoFirst St. and Bakersfield-California Ave. when PM2.5 mass concentrations were higher 

than 30 μg/m3 between Nov. and Feb.

Sources

Average source contribution (Nov. – Feb.)

Fresno Bakersfield

Secondary nitrate 20.14 28.83

Secondary sulfate 2.42 3.80

Motor vehicle 8.58 5.69

Biomass smoke 4.87 2.83

Airborne soil 0.18 0.71

Aged sea salt 0.47 2.52

Industrial 0.35 0.38

No. of days 21 25

A4-14
Figure A1. Source profiles deduced from PM2.5 samples measured at Fresno-First St. 

(prediction ± standard deviation).

A4-15
Figure A2. Source profiles deduced from PM2.5 samples measured at BakersfieldCalifornia Ave. (prediction ± standard deviation).

A4-16
Figure A3. Source contributions deduced from PM2.5 samples measured at Fresno-First 

St.

A4-17
Figure A4. Source contributions deduced from PM2.5 samples measured at BakersfieldCalifornia Ave. (missing data: Jan. - Jun. 2009)

A4-18
Figure A5. Weekday/weekend variations at Fresno-First St. (mean ± 95 % distribution).

A4-19
Figure A6. Weekday/weekend variations at Bakersfield-California Ave. (mean ± 95 % 

distribution).

A4-20
Figure A7. The monthly variations of source contributions to PM2.5 mass concentration 

at Fresno-First St. (mean ± 95 % distribution).

A4-21
Figure A8. The monthly variations of source contributions to PM2.5 mass concentration 

at Bakersfield-California Ave. (mean ± 95 % distribution).

A4-22
Secondary nitrate

Figure A9. Conditional probability function plots for the highest 25% of the mass 

contributions at Fresno-First St.

A4-23
Secondary nitrate

Figure A10. Conditional probability function plots for the highest 25% of the mass 

contributions at Bakersfield-California Ave.

A4-24
APPENDIX B

SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY 2015 PM2.5 SIP

Additional Emission Reductions Achieved Towards Meeting 

Aggregate Commitment

B-1
I. ARB Reductions

A. State-funded Incentive-based Emission Reduction Measures. 

At its board hearing in October 2014, ARB approved the Report on Reductions 

Achieved from Incentive-Based Emission Reduction Measures in the San Joaquin 

Valley as the mechanism to allow California to receive SIP credit for specific reductions 

achieved through the Proposition 1B and Moyer incentive programs. These incentives 

provide additional reductions of 7.8 tons per day (tpd) of NOx and 0.2 tpd of PM2.5 in 

2014 and are being credited toward the State’s aggregate commitment. This report was 

submitted to U.S. EPA on November 17, 2014. Information regarding this ARB Board 

item is available at http://www.arb.ca.gov/planning/sip/sjvpm25/sjvpm25.htm. 

B. Actual Compliance with Truck and Bus Rule. 

ARB’s in-use diesel fueled truck and bus regulation requires trucks and buses to install 

diesel particulate filters starting January 1, 2012 and to upgrade to 2010 model year or 

newer engines starting January 1, 2015. When ARB adopted the rule staff’s emission 

reduction calculations were based on preliminary PM2.5 diesel particulate filter (DPF) 

efficiencies and assumed that owners of trucks with pre-2007 engines would retrofit 

those trucks rather than purchase new trucks. Based on current compliance reporting, 

staff have found that the DPFs are more efficient than original estimates and many

owners of pre-2007 trucks opted to purchase new vehicles rather than retrofit. The 

original, 2008 SJV PM2.5 Plan baseline, baseline with rule, and net rule benefit 

emissions estimates are provided in Table B-1 below as annual average emission 

estimates in tpd in 2014. These estimates utilized the latest draft version of 

EMFAC2011 that was available at the time. 

Table B-1.

SIP, Draft EMFAC2011 (Original Estimates Submitted to USEPA)

w/rule Baseline Benefit

NOx PM2.5 Ex NOx PM2.5 Ex NOx PM2.5 Ex

110.6 1.97 111.8 3.69 1.19 1.73

For the original analysis of rule benefits in Table B-1, staff assumed that the only 

compliance option that would be chosen by owners of trucks with pre-2007 engines to 

comply with the PM requirement of the rules would be to retrofit their trucks with 

aftermarket DPFs. However, since the time of the original analysis, based on reported 

data, staff have found that owners of trucks with pre-2007 engines selected a different 

compliance path. More owners than expected opted to turn-over their older trucks and 

purchase newer ones – which are cleaner than retrofits -- rather than installing retrofit 

DPFs. Thus, the actual compliance paths that have been selected by truck owners 

B-2
have resulted in a cleaner than expected fleet and, therefore, additional benefits beyond 

what was originally estimated. 

To estimate the additional emission benefits caused by the higher than expected turnover to newer, cleaner trucks, staff reviewed the latest available statewide data on the 

number of trucks with retrofits contained in ARB’s TRUCRS database, estimated the 

fraction of expected turn-over to 2007 or 2010 engines for the remaining trucks, then reran EMFAC2011 to estimate the updated rule benefits. 

Statewide, approximately 86,000 retrofits of California-plated trucks in calendar year 

2014 were assumed in the original EMFAC2011 estimate. As of January 2014, 16,000 

retrofits were reported in ARB’s TRUCRS database. For this analysis, the remaining 

trucks were assumed to be turned over to trucks having either 2007 or 2010 engines. 

Of the remaining 70,000 trucks that are not retrofitted, staff assumed that half (or 

35,000) complied by turning over to trucks with 2007 standard engines while the other 

half turned over to trucks having 2010 standard engines. This 50/50 turn-over 

assumption is conservative; and is supported by reporting from truckers, who have

indicated that purchase of a 2010 engine is a better business decision for trucks that will 

be kept long-term. This is supported by data that shows that there are a greater 

number of trucks with 2010-2013 engines available on the market, and trucks with 2010 

or newer engines achieve better fuel economy. 

The statewide turn-over rates determined above are applied to the latest available truck 

populations. In the San Joaquin Valley, data show 11,800 California plated T7 trucks,

5,000 T6 trucks, and 2,600 out-of-state T7 trucks. Since T6 trucks have smaller 

engines and emit less, staff assumed that the population of T6 trucks is equivalent to a 

0.6 fraction of the T7 truck population (i.e. 40% are ‘all other buses’) consistent with 

EMFAC2011. With these assumptions, the California plated “T7 equivalent” truck 

population in the San Joaquin Valley is estimated to be 14,800 trucks and the total 

(including both California and out-of-state) “T7 equivalent” population is 17,400 trucks. 

Table B-2 below summarizes applying the statewide ratios to these Valley totals, which 

yields 6,023 California plated trucks and 7,081 total trucks in the San Joaquin Valley for 

both the 2007 and 2010 standards.

Table B-2.

San Joaquin Valley Truck Engine Population

Turnover to Fraction CA plated only, 14,800 All, 17,400

2007 0.407 6,023 7,081

2010 0.407 6,023 7,081

Table B-3 provides a summary of the emission factors that are used in the update. 

Based on recent studies that show 2007 and 2010 original equipment manufacturer 

(OEM) DPFs to have greater PM2.5 control efficiency than previously anticipated1

, the 

1 Effect of Advanced After-treatment for PM and NOx Control on Heavy-Duty Diesel Truck Emissions. 

Jorn Dinh Herner, Shaohua Hu, William H. Robertson, Tao Huai, John F. Collins, Harry Dwyer, and 

Alberto Ayala. Environmental Science & Technology200943 (15), 5928-5933. DOI: 10.1021/es9008294

B-3

 
table assumes a 95% OEM DPF effectiveness instead of the originally anticipated 90% 

OEM DPF effectiveness.

Table B-3. Truck Emission Factors

EF, g/mile

PM2.5 NOx

Pre-2007 fleet avg T7, retrofit 0.0962 15.77

2006, T7 Tractor, retrofit 0.0980 11.73

2007 T7 Tractor, 95% DPF 0.0454 7.74

2010 T7 Tractor, 95% DPF 0.0454 2.46

EMFAC2011 was then used to calculate the additional pollutant benefits in Table B-4

using the vehicle populations and emission factors discussed above. The tabulated 

benefits are over and above the originally-calculated benefits that are provided in Table 

B-1. The analysis assumes that the turned-over trucks are all trucks with 2006 model 

year engines containing retrofit DPFs. Table B-4 provides the emission reductions in 

2014 that are being credited toward the State’s aggregate commitment

Table B-4. 2014 Emission Estimates

2006 MY 

Turn-over

CA plated

NOx 11.5

PM2.5 0.1

C. 2012 PERP and Portable Engine ATCM. 

The ARB Portable Equipment Registration Program (PERP) provides an important 

voluntary mechanism to allow owners and operators of portable engines and equipment 

to operate at various locations throughout the State without obtaining individual 

operating permits in each local air district in which the unit may be operated. The Board 

originally approved the PERP Regulation in 1997. In 2004, ARB also established 

requirements for portable diesel-fired engines under the Airborne Toxic Control 

Measure for Diesel Particulate Matter from Portable Devices (Portable Engine ATCM) to 

ensure adequate control of air toxics emissions including diesel PM, for operation of 

such engines under PERP. The Portable Engine ATCM requires portable diesel-fueled 

engines that have not been permitted or registered prior to January 1, 2006, to meet the 

most stringent of the federal or California emission standards for nonroad engines in 

effect at the time of registration or permit. These two programs reduce emissions by 

requiring the removal of uncertified engines from the registered fleet. 

Amendments to both the Statewide PERP Regulation and Portable Engine ATCM were 

approved by the Board in 2010. The 2010 staff report for these amendments included 

the emission impact of both rules in 2010 and following years. The expected emission 

B-4
reductions realized by both rules were 25.2 tons per day of NOx and 1.9 tons per day of 

diesel PM statewide beginning in 2011. The State submitted the PERP Regulation and 

Portable Engine ATCM in 2012. The 2008 PM2.5 Plan did not account for the emission 

reductions from these programs. 

To reflect the portion of these emission reductions that occur in the Valley, staff

apportioned the emission reductions to reflect the portion of the Statewide equipment 

that operate in the San Joaquin Valley. Due to the natural turnover of portable 

equipment and engines between 2011 and 2014, the emission reductions were scaled 

to reflect 2014 emissions. Table B-5 provides the emission reductions from the PERP 

and Portable Diesel Engine ATCM that are being credited toward the State’s aggregate 

commitment. Information related to the emission reductions are documented in the 

2010 staff report regarding these ARB programs and can be found at 

http://www.arb.ca.gov/portable/portable.htm and 

http://www.arb.ca.gov/regact/2010/perp2010/perpisor.pdf. 

Table B-5.

2014 SJV PERP and Portable Diesel Engine ATCM 

Emission Reductions

2010 Statewide PERP and ATCM Emission 

Reductions1

NOx PM2.5

25.2 1.9

2014 SJV Portion of Off-Road Equipment 12% 11%

Discounted for Natural Turnover from 2010 to 

2014 80% 75%

2014 SJV PERP and ATCM Emission 

Reductions 2.5 0.2

*Numbers may not add up due to rounding

II. District Reductions

A. Voluntary Woodstove Replacement Program

The District has a comprehensive incentive program to provide funding for residents 

residing in the District to replace less efficient woodstoves with more efficient stoves or 

gas burning devices. Table B-6 is the project list of woodstove replacements in place 

as of December 31, 2013 providing emission reductions during the entire 2014 calendar 

year. 

B-5
Table B-6. SJV 2014 Woodstove Replacement Projects From ISR Incentive Funding

Old Device

New Device

Certified Grand Total

Wood Device

Certified Pellet 

Device Gas Device

Open Hearth 

Fireplace 49 75 2870 2994

Non-certified 

Wood Device 43 28 342 413

Non-certified 

Pellet Device 0 2 46 48

Certified 

Wood Device 0 8 121 129

Certified Pellet 

Device 0 0 28 28

Grand Total 92 113 3407 3612

The woodstove replacement resulted in the emission reductions in Table B-7 that are 

being credited towards the State’s aggregate emission reduction commitment. The 

detailed methodology to estimate these emission reductions is provided in 

Appendix B-1.

Table B-7. SJV 2014 Woodstove Replacement Emission Reductions

Replaced Devices NOx PM2.5

Open Hearth Fireplace 0.0040 0.05

Non-Certified Wood -0.0008 0.05

Non-Certified Pellet 0.0000 0.00

Certified Wood Device -0.0012 0.01

Certified Pellet -0.0001 0.00

Total 0.0019 0.10

B. Rule 9510 Indirect Source Review On-Site Compliance

The District through its Rule 9510, Indirect Source Review, requires construction and 

development projects to mitigate on-site emissions or pay a fee to mitigate those 

projects. When U.S. EPA approved Rule 9510 (76 FR 26609), they did not credit 

emission reductions since U.S. EPA did not have information available at the time to 

determine which projects would comply with the rule through on-site reductions as 

compared to projects that would elect to pay to achieve emission reductions off-site. 

The District now has a record of projects that have complied via the on-site mitigation. 

The documentation specifies the NOx and PM10 emission reductions for each project. 

To further estimate the portion of PM2.5 applicable to the projects, staff applied a PM2.5 

to PM10 emissions ratio of 0.15 and 0.92 to the PM10 totals for dust and exhaust, 

B-6
respectively. The District’s list of projects (Appendix B-2) documents that reductions of 

0.1 tpd of PM2.5 reductions along with the 1.0 tpd of NOx reductions can be credited.

C. Actual Compliance with Rule 4901

As part of the District’s PM2.5 Contingency Quantification 2008 PM2.5 SIP, the District 

updated the emission reductions attributed to the Rule 4901 to meet 2015 contingency 

requirements. The emission reductions were higher than the previous estimate U.S. 

EPA noted in their September 20, 2011 Technical Support Document (TSD). The 

previous estimates were based on 2006 air quality to estimate the number of days 

burning would have been curtailed prior to the rule being implemented. The District 

updated the emission reduction estimates based on 2009-2013 air quality data reflective 

of actual rule implementation. U.S. EPA approved this approach and the associated

contingency reductions in 2014 (79 FR 29327). This same methodology is being used 

to document the actual emission reductions that are appropriate for credit towards 

meeting the District’s aggregate commitment. The new estimate increases the amount 

of PM2.5 reductions by 1.3 tpd beyond the 1.0 tpd reduction credited in the TSD.

D. Compliance with Rule 4320

In 2008, the District adopted rule 4320. This rule requires that boilers, steam 

generators, or process heaters with a total rated heat input greater than 5 million BTU 

per hour comply with the new emission limits specified by the rule or pay an annual fee 

to the District. U.S. EPA approved Rule 4320 (76 FR 16696) in 2011 but did not credit 

emission reductions as the compliance path sources would select was unknown at the 

time. Now that rule 4320 has been fully implemented, the District has documentation 

demonstrating that operators of 472 of the applicable units chose to pay a fee and the 

operators of the remaining 692 units chose to retrofit to comply with the rule. Based on 

the emission limits and rule requirements, the District estimated the actual emission 

reductions for these 692 units as specified in Table B-8.

B-7
Table B-8 Actual 2014 Emission Reductions from Rule 4320

Category Category #Units

Total 

MMBtu/hr

Operating 

CapacityA

Current 

ppmv

Current 

lb/MMBtu

Current 

Emission 

(tpd)

New 

ppmv

New 

lb/MMBtu

New 

Emission 

(tpd)

Reduction 

(tpd)

Reduction 

by 

Category 

(tpd)

> 5 to 20.0 

MMBtu/hr A 216 3,539.74 0.50 15 0.018 0.382 9 0.011 0.234 0.149

0.149

> 20.0 

MMBtu/hr B 167 10,682.77 0.50 9 0.011 0.705 7 0.008 0.513 0.192

0.192

Oilfield Steam 

Generators

C 2 139 9,704.15 0.75 15 0.018 1.572 7 0.008 0.699 0.873

C 3 126 6,918.06 0.75 15 0.018 1.121 12 0.014 0.872 0.249

1.122

Refinery Units D 1 22 256.69 0.75 30 0.036 0.083 9 0.011 0.025 0.058

D 2 22 1,199.48 0.75 25 0.031 0.335 6 0.0074 0.080 0.255

0.313

TOTAL 692 4.20 2.4 1.8 1.78

Percent 

Reduction 42.3%

B-8
E. District funded Incentive-Based Emission Reduction Measure

On June 20, 2013, the District adopted Rule 9610: State Implementation Plan Credit for 

Emission Reductions Generated through Incentive Programs (Rule 9610). Rule 9610

provided an administrative mechanism for the District to receive credit towards State 

Implementation Plan requirements for emission reductions achieved in the San Joaquin 

Valley Air Basin through incentive programs administered by the District, Natural 

Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), or ARB. Rule 9610 demonstrates how the 

reductions meet U.S. EPA requirements for credit toward fulfilling the aggregate 

emission reductions commitment in the 2008 PM2.5 Plan. According to Rule 9610 the 

District provides an Annual Demonstration Report through a public process that lists 

specific project information including emission reductions from all the incentive projects 

it administers. To date, the District has developed 2013 and 2014 Annual 

Demonstration reports that can be found 

at http://www.valleyair.org/MOP/mop9610_idx.htm.

ARB quantified emission reductions from ARB-funded and District-administered projects 

that provide emission reductions throughout the 2014 attainment year in the 2008 

PM2.5 Plan in its Report on Reductions Achieved from Incentive-Based Emission 

Reduction Measures in the San Joaquin Valley (2014 Incentives Report) dated 

September 22, 2014. These projects were funded through the Carl Moyer Memorial Air 

Quality Standards Attainment Program (Moyer Program) and Proposition 1B: Goods 

Movement Emission Reduction Program (Prop 1B). The 2014 Incentives Report also 

demonstrated how the reductions meet U.S. EPA requirements for credit toward fulfilling 

the aggregate emission reductions commitment in the SJV 2008 PM2.5 Plan. 

This document addresses the emission reductions from certain District-funded incentive 

projects that the District administered according to Moyer Program guidelines. The list 

of projects in Appendix B-3 includes details regarding each project that was funded by 

the District and provides reference by project category to the appropriate Moyer 

Program guideline year and chapter. For each project category, Table B-9 outlines 

where the demonstration of how these reductions meet U.S. EPA requirements for 

credit toward fulfilling the aggregate emission reductions commitment can be found. 

B-9
Table B-10

U.S. EPA Requirement Demonstration by Specific Project Categories

Component Component Option Primary Function Applicable Guideline

Integrity 

Demonstration

in 2014

Incentives

Report

Integrity 

Demonstration

in SJV Rule 9610

Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump The Carl Moyer Program Guidelines, approved 03/27/2008, Chpt 10 x x

Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump The Carl Moyer Program Guidelines, approved 11/17/2005, Chpt 10 x x

Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Diesel Irrigation Pump The Carl Moyer Program Guidelines, approved 03/27/2008, Chpt 10 x x

Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Diesel Irrigation Pump The Carl Moyer Program Guidelines, approved 04/28/2011, Chpt 10 x x

Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump The Carl Moyer Program Guidelines, approved 03/27/2008, Chpt 10 x x

Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump The Carl Moyer Program Guidelines, approved 04/28/2011, Chpt 10 x x

Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump The Carl Moyer Program Guidelines, approved 11/17/2005, Chpt 10 x x

Ag Engine Ag New Electric Motor Irrigation Pump The Carl Moyer Program Guidelines, approved 03/27/2008, Chpt 10 x x

Ag Engine Ag New Electric Motor Irrigation Pump The Carl Moyer Program Guidelines, approved 04/28/2011, Chpt 10 x x

Off-Road Engine Repower Agricultural Tractor The Carl Moyer Program Guidelines, approved 03/27/2008, Chpt 5 x x

Off-Road Engine Repower Almond Shaker The Carl Moyer Program Guidelines, approved 03/27/2008, Chpt 5 x x

Off-Road Engine Repower Almond Sweeper The Carl Moyer Program Guidelines, approved 03/27/2008, Chpt 5 x x

Off-Road Engine Repower Carrot Harvester The Carl Moyer Program Guidelines, approved 03/27/2008, Chpt 5 x x

Off-Road Engine Repower Combine The Carl Moyer Program Guidelines, approved 03/27/2008, Chpt 5 x x

Off-Road Engine Repower Conveyor The Carl Moyer Program Guidelines, approved 4/28/2011, Chpt 7 x x

Off-Road Engine Repower Crawler Tractor The Carl Moyer Program Guidelines, approved 03/27/2008, Chpt 5 x x

Off-Road Engine Repower Dozer The Carl Moyer Program Guidelines, approved 03/27/2008, Chpt 5 x x

Off-Road Engine Repower Grape Harvester The Carl Moyer Program Guidelines, approved 03/27/2008, Chpt 5 x x

Off-Road Engine Repower Harvester The Carl Moyer Program Guidelines, approved 03/27/2008, Chpt 5 x x

Off-Road Engine Repower Other Agricultural The Carl Moyer Program Guidelines, approved 03/27/2008, Chpt 5 x x

Off-Road Engine Repower Sprayer The Carl Moyer Program Guidelines, approved 03/27/2008, Chpt 5 x x

Off-Road Engine Repower Sprayer The Carl Moyer Program Guidelines, approved 4/28/2011, Chpt 7 x x

Off-Road Engine Repower Wheel Loader The Carl Moyer Program Guidelines, approved 4/28/2011, Chpt 7 x x

Off-Road Engine Repower & Retrofit Combine The Carl Moyer Program Guidelines, approved 03/27/2008, Chpt 5 x x

Off-Road Engine Repower & Retrofit Crawler Tractor The Carl Moyer Program Guidelines, approved 03/27/2008, Chpt 5 x x

Off-Road Engine Repower & Retrofit Other Agricultural Equipment The Carl Moyer Program Guidelines, approved 03/27/2008, Chpt 5 x x

Off-Road Engine Repower & Retrofit Tractor The Carl Moyer Program Guidelines, approved 03/27/2008, Chpt 5 x x

Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Ag Forage Harvester The Carl Moyer Program Guidelines, approved 4/28/2011, Chpt 9 x

Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Ag Tractor Crawler The Carl Moyer Program Guidelines, approved 4/28/2011, Chpt 9 x

Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Loader The Carl Moyer Program Guidelines, approved 4/28/2011, Chpt 9 x

Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor The Carl Moyer Program Guidelines, approved 4/28/2011, Chpt 9 x

Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Almond Sweeper The Carl Moyer Program Guidelines, approved 4/28/2011, Chpt 9 x

Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Bulk Carrier The Carl Moyer Program Guidelines, approved 4/28/2011, Chpt 9 x

Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Combine The Carl Moyer Program Guidelines, approved 4/28/2011, Chpt 9 x

Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Forklift The Carl Moyer Program Guidelines, approved 4/28/2011, Chpt 9 x

Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Hay Hauler The Carl Moyer Program Guidelines, approved 4/28/2011, Chpt 9 x

Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Swathers The Carl Moyer Program Guidelines, approved 4/28/2011, Chpt 9 x

Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Tomato Harvester The Carl Moyer Program Guidelines, approved 4/28/2011, Chpt 9 x

Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Wheel Loader The Carl Moyer Program Guidelines, approved 4/28/2011, Chpt 9 x

B-10
This project list in Appendix B-3 was generated from the District’s 2013 and 2014 

Annual Demonstration Report Data Sheets that can be found at 

[http://www.valleyair.org/MOP/mop9610_idx.htm]. Only those District-funded projects 

with a completed post-inspection as of December 31, 2013, and that will produce 

surplus emission reductions through the entire 2014 calendar year were included. 

Contingency emission reductions are required to be held in reserve and cannot be 

counted towards attainment. Therefore, to ensure that the identified projects are 

surplus in this specific context, this preliminary list was then cross-referenced by project 

identification number to the list of projects that were approved for 2015 attainment 

contingency purposes in Attachments A and B in U.S. EPA’s Technical Support 

Document for its Proposed Approval of Clean Air Act Section 172(c)(9) Contingency 

Measures in the San Joaquin valley State Implementation Plan for Attainment of the 

1997 PM2.5 Standards, dated August 15, 2013. These contingency projects were 

originally selected from the list in the District’s 2013 Annual Demonstration Report. All 

projects that appeared in both the preliminary project list and the contingency project list 

were then removed from the list of SIP-eligible projects to be credited. The project list 

at the end of this section includes a list of incentive projects with associated emission 

reductions that follow the approved incentive program guidelines, meet U.S. EPA’s 

integrity elements, and are therefore SIP eligible.

The emission reductions from this project list in the San Joaquin Valley are summarized 

in Table B-10. 

B-11
Table 10

2014 District-Funded Incentive-Based Emission Reductions Achieved 

In the San Joaquin Valley

Source Category Technology Guideline 

Year

Guideline 

Chapter

Emission 

Reductions (tpd)

NOx PM2.5

Stationary and Portable 

Agricultural Engines: 

Irrigation Pumps

Repower 2005 10 0.04 0.0

Stationary and Portable 

Agricultural Engines: 

Irrigation Pumps

Repower 2008 10 0.57 0.02

Stationary and Portable 

Agricultural Engines: 

Irrigation Pumps

Repower 2011 10 0.08 0.00

Off-Road Equipment - Mobile 

Agricultural

Repower & 

Retrofit 2008 5 0.01 0.00

Off-Road Equipment - Mobile 

Agricultural Repower 2011 7 0.0 0.0

Off-road Equipment – Mobile 

Agricultural Replacement 2011 9 1.06 0.04

TOTAL 1.8 0.1

Totals may not add up due to rounding.

B-12
Appendix B-1

Methodology

Based on the woodstove replacement project list below, ARB followed U.S. EPA 

guidance to develop the methodology for the emission reduction credits. The formula 

for calculating the credits was based on U.S. EPA’s Guidance for Quantifying and Using 

Emission Reductions from Voluntary Woodstove Changeout Programs in State 

Implementation Plans prepared in 2006.

1

The following general equation can be used to determine emissions of any source 

category2:

E = A x EF x (1-ER/100)

Where: 

• E = emissions

• A = activity rate

• EF = emissions factor, and;

• ER = overall emission reduction efficiency, %

The basic equation above is modified since we are interested in the improvement in 

emissions based on the change in efficiency from old conventional stoves to newer 

more efficient stoves. Therefore, the equation becomes3

:

E = A x EF x (NEconv/NEnew)

Where: 

• E = emissions

• A = activity rate

• EF = emissions factor, and;

• NEx = Net efficiency of the stove

The following generally explains and describes where the inputs are derived from. 

Activity Rate

For residential wood combustion, the activity rate is expressed in tons of wood used per 

day and is provided as a single constant, and determined from the emissions inventory. 

For the activity rate, staff utilized ARB’s residential wood combustion documentation 

that is used to estimate the criteria pollutant emissions from the various types of 

residential wood combustion for each county throughout the State. The activity rate 

from ARB’s documentation has a unit of measurement of tons per household and is 

provided below for each device type. 

1 http://www.epa.gov/burnwise/pdfs/guidance_quantfying_jan.pdf

2 Pg. B1, http://www.epa.gov/burnwise/pdfs/guidance_quantfying_jan.pdf 3 Pg. B3, http://www.epa.gov/burnwise/pdfs/guidance_quantfying_jan.pdf

 
Table B-8. Fireplace Fuel Combustion4

Activity Rate

County Total Cord wood 

burned in 

fireplaces, 

tons/yr

# Homes with 

fireplaces in use

# of fireplaces 

per home

Tons burned 

per 

household

Fresno 16608 40107 1.1 0.414092303

Kern(SJV) 11477 23669 1.1 0.484895855

Kings 2195 4664 1.1 0.470626072

Madera 4260 5939 1.1 0.717292473

Merced 5147 10476 1.1 0.491313478

San Joaquin 26492 56298 1.1 0.470567338

Stanislaus 13373 33451 1.1 0.399778781

Tulare 11162 23720 1.1 0.470573356

Air Basin 

Total 90714 1983245 1.16 0.50

Table B-9. Woodstove Fuel Combustion

Activity Rate

County # of cord of wood burned in 

wood stoves 

(cords/home/yr)

Convert 

cord/household

to 

tons/household

(1.54 tons/cord)

Fresno 2.09 3.2186

Kern(SJV) 1.57 2.4178

Kings 1.16 1.7864

Madera 2.61 4.0194

Merced 2.67 4.1118

San Joaquin 1.15 1.771

Stanislaus 1.55 2.387

Tulare 2.4 3.696

Air Basin 

Total 1.9 2.93

4 Table B-1, B-2, Attachment #3, ARB’s Residential Wood Combustion Appendix B 5 Table A-5, Attachment #2, ARB’s Residential Wood Combustion Appendix A 6 Table A-9, A-10, Attachment #2, ARB’s Residential Wood Combustion Appendix A

 
Table B-10. Pellet Device Fuel Combustion

Activity Rate

County Total pellets 

burned in pellet 

stoves, tons/yr

# Homes with 

pellet stoves in 

use

Tons burned per 

household

Butte 684 342 2.00

Colusa 53 26 2.04

Sutter 238 119 2.00

Yuba 176 88 2.00

Glenn 76 38 2.00

Placer (SV) 3901 1950 2.00

Sacramento 18923 9461 2.00

Shasta 546 273 2.00

Tehama 179 90 1.99

Solano 18688 934 20.01

Yolo 2496 1248 2.00

Grand Total 45960 14569 3.15

Emissions factors are reported in mass of pollutant per mass of dry wood, therefore 

cords needs to be converted into mass. Similar to the activity rate, staff utilized ARB’s 

residential wood combustion documentation that is used to estimate the criteria 

pollutant emissions from the various types of residential wood combustion for each 

county throughout the State. Because U.S. EPA’s guidance does not include emissions 

estimates for fireplaces or other similar devices that burn natural gas, staff used 

emission factors from U.S. EPA’s AP42, 1.4: Natural Gas Combustion7

. 

Natural Gas Emission Factor

The emission factor for natural gas is given in lb/106 scf.8 The following is the 

conversion to lbs/household based on activity rate for both fireplaces and woodstoves. 

(Results may differ due to rounding)

Scf/household conversion = (Btu/lbs of wood burned) 9 X 

(amount of lbs per ton) X (device activity rate) 10 ÷ (average gross heat value) 11

Open Hearth Fireplace

7,666.95 scf/household wood heat = (8,000 Btu/lbs of wood) X (2,000 lbs/ton) X 

(.50 tons/household) ÷ (1050 Btu/scf)

7 http://www.epa.gov/ttnchie1/ap42/

8 Pg. 5 -6, http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ch01/final/c01s04.pdf 9 Pg. 1, http://www.epa.gov/ttnchie1/ap42/ch01/final/c01s06.pdf 10 Given in Table 3, 4, and 5 above

11 Pg. 1, http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ch01/final/c01s04.pdf

 
NOx emission factor in lbs/household = (NOx emission factor in lb/106 scf)12 X 

(scf/household wood heat)

0.72 lbs/household of NOx = (94 lb/106 scf) X (7,666.95 scf/household wood heat)

PM2.5 emission factor in lbs/household = (PM2.5 emission factor in lb/106 scf)13 X 

(scf/household wood heat) 

0.06 lbs/household of PM2.5 = (7.6 lb/106 scf) X (7,666.95 scf/household wood heat)

Woodstove

44,586.67 scf/household wood heat = (8,000 Btu/lbs of wood) X (2,000 lbs/ton) X 

(2.93 tons/household) ÷ (1050 Btu/scf)

NOx emission factor in lbs/household = (NOx emission factor in lb/106 scf)14 X 

(scf/household wood heat)

4.19 lbs/household of NOx = (94 lb/106 scf) X (44,586.67 scf/household wood heat)

PM2.5 emission factor in lbs/household = (PM2.5 emission factor in lb/106 scf)15 X 

(scf/household wood heat) 

0.34 lbs/household of PM2.5 = (7.6 lb/106 scf) X (44,586.67 scf/household wood heat)

Pellet Device

48,000 scf/household wood heat = (8,000 Btu/lbs of wood) X (2,000 lbs/ton) X 

(3.15 tons/household) ÷ (1050 Btu/scf)

NOx emission factor in lbs/household = (NOx emission factor in lb/106 scf)16 X 

(scf/household wood heat)

4.51 lbs/household of NOx = (94 lb/106 scf) X (48,000 scf/household wood heat)

PM2.5 emission factor in lbs/household = (PM2.5 emission factor in lb/106 scf)17 X

(scf/household wood heat) 

0.37 lbs/household of PM2.5 = (7.6 lb/106 scf) X (48,000 scf/household wood heat)

Net Efficiency

The net efficiency of a residential heating combustion device is the product combustion 

efficiency and heat transfer efficiency. U.S. EPA has two different sources for net 

12 Pg. 5, http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ch01/final/c01s04.pdf 13 Pg. 6, http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ch01/final/c01s04.pdf 14 Pg. 5, http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ch01/final/c01s04.pdf 15 Pg. 6, http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ch01/final/c01s04.pdf 16 Pg. 5, http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ch01/final/c01s04.pdf 17 Pg. 6, http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ch01/final/c01s04.pdf

 
efficiency, one of which is included in the U.S. EPA changeout guidance provided above 

and the other is U.S. EPA’s Burn Wise Fuel Efficiency Calculator. 18

Open Hearth Fireplace

The following is the emission reduction credit, including referenced inputs from above, 

for replacing 2994 open hearth fireplaces with either certified wood, certified pellet, or 

gas devices. 

Activity Rate

To calculate the activity rate, staff utilized ARB’s Residential Wood Combustion 

documentation. The average consumption of wood in the District is 0.50 tons per 

household. 

Emission Factor

The emission factor for open hearth fireplaces using cord wood bundles for NOx and 

PM2.5 is 2.6 and 22.7 lb/ton fuel burned, respectively.19 

The emission factor for certified wood device using cord wood bundles for NOx and 

PM2.5 is 2 and 19.6 lb/ton fuel burned, respectively. 20 These emission factors 

represent the catalytic rather than the non-catalytic mode of burning since the catalytic 

is more conservative within respect to PM2.5, but not NOx.

The emission factor for a certified pellet device using pellets for NOx and PM2.5 is 3.8 

and 2.9 lb/ton fuel burned, respectively. 21 The same emission factors were used for 

non-certified pellet devices. 

The emission factor for gas device using natural gas for NOx and PM2.5 is .72 and 

.06 lb/106 scf, respectively.22

Net Efficiency

The net efficiency for open hearth fireplaces is not provided in U.S. EPA’s guidance so 

staff used the most conservative and comparative device under the guidance which is 

the conventional woodstove. The conventional woodstove has a net efficiency of 54 

percent. 23 

18 http://www.eia.gov/neic/experts/heatcalc.xls 19 Pg. 7.1-12, Attachment #1, ARB’s Residential Wood Combustion

20 Ibid.

21 Ibid.

22 Pg. 5-6, http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ch01/final/c01s04.pdf 23 Pg. B-3, http://www.epa.gov/burnwise/pdfs/guidance_quantfying_jan.pdf

 
The District information does not distinguish between non-catalytic and catalytic certified 

wood devices, but U.S. EPA’s guidance has the same net efficiency of 68 percent. 24 

There are two different pellet stove net efficiencies. The District certified and noncertified pellet devices were assumed to have net efficiency values of 68 and 56 

percent, respectively.25 

The gas device net efficiency is derived from U.S. EPA’s Burn Wise Fuel Efficiency 

Calculator. Staff selected the more conservative net efficiency for Room Heater 

(Vented) which has a value of 65 percent. 26

Non-Certified Wood Device 

The following is the emission reduction credit, including referenced inputs, for replacing 

413 non-certified wood devices with certified wood, certified pellet, or gas devices.

Activity Rate

To calculate the activity rate, staff utilized ARB’s Residential Wood Combustion 

documentation. The average consumption of wood in the District is 2.93 tons per 

household as noted above. 

Emission Factor

The emission factor for a non-certified wood device using cord wood bundles for NOx 

and PM2.5 is 2.8 and 29.5 lb/ton fuel burned, respectively.27 

The emission factor for a certified wood device using cord wood bundles for NOx and 

PM2.5 is 2 and 19.6 lb/ton fuel burned, respectively. 28 These emission factors 

represent the catalytic rather than the non-catalytic mode of combustion since the 

catalytic mode is more conservative within respect to PM2.5, but not NOx. 

The emission factor for a certified pellet device using pellets for NOx and PM2.5 is 3.8 

and 2.9 lb/ton fuel burned, respectively. 29 The same emission factor was used for noncertified pellet devices. The emission factor for a gas device using natural gas for NOx 

and PM2.5 is 4.19 and 0.34 lb/106 scf, respectively.30

24 Ibid.

25 Ibid.

26 http://www.eia.gov/neic/experts/heatcalc.xls 27 Table 1, Attachment #1, ARB’s Residential Wood Combustion

28 Ibid.

29 Ibid.

30 Pg. 5-6, http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ch01/final/c01s04.pdf

 
Net Efficiency 

The net efficiency of a non-certified wood device is provided in U.S. EPA’s guidance 

and the conventional woodstove has a net efficiency of 54 percent. 31 Similarly, the net 

efficiency for both catalytic and non-catalytic certified wood device in U.S. EPA’s 

guidance is 68 percent. 32 

There are two different pellet stove net efficiencies. The District certified and noncertified pellet devices were assumed to have net efficiency values of 68 and 56 

percent, respectively.33 

The gas device net efficiency is derived from U.S. EPA’s Burn Wise Fuel Efficiency 

Calculator. Staff selected the more conservative net efficiency for Room Heater 

(Vented) which has a value of 65 percent. 34

Non-Certified Pellet Device 

The following is the emission reduction credit, including referenced inputs, for replacing

48 non-certified pellet devices with either certified pellet or gas devices.

Activity Rate

To calculate the activity rate, staff utilized ARB’s Residential Wood Combustion 

documentation. The average consumption of wood in the District is 3.15 tons per 

household as noted above. 

Emission Factor

The emission factor for a non-certified pellet device using pellets for NOx and PM2.5 is 

3.8 and 2.9 lb/ton fuel burned, respectively. 35 

The emission factor for gas device using natural gas for NOx and PM2.5 is 4.19 and 

0.34 lb/106 scf, respectively.36

Net Efficiency 

There are two different pellet stove net efficiencies. The District certified and noncertified pellet devices were assumed to have net efficiency values of 68 and 56 

percent, respectively.37

31 Pg. B-3, http://www.epa.gov/burnwise/pdfs/guidance_quantfying_jan.pdf 32 Ibid.

33 Ibid.

34 http://www.eia.gov/neic/experts/heatcalc.xls 35 Ibid.

36 Pg. 5-6, http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ch01/final/c01s04.pdf 37 Ibid.

 
The gas device net efficiency is derived from U.S. EPA’s Burn Wise Fuel Efficiency 

Calculator. Staff selected the more conservative net efficiency for Room Heater 

(Vented) which has a value of 65 percent. 38

Certified Wood Device

The following is the emission reduction credit, including referenced inputs, for replacing 

129 certified wood devices with either certified pellet or gas devices.

Activity Rate

To calculate the activity rate, staff utilized ARB’s Residential Wood Combustion 

documentation. The average consumption of wood in the District is 2.93 tons per 

household as noted above. 

Emission Factor

The emission factor for certified wood device using cord wood bundles for NOx and 

PM2.5 is 2 and 19.6 lb/ton fuel burned, respectively. 39 These emission factors 

represent the catalytic rather than the non-catalytic mode of combustion since the

catalytic mode is more conservative within respect to PM2.5, but not NOx.

The emission factor for certified pellet device using pellets for NOx and PM2.5 is 3.8 

and 2.9 lb/ton fuel burned, respectively. 40 

The emission factor for gas device using natural gas for NOx and PM2.5 is 4.19 and 

0.34 lb/106 scf, respectively.41

Net Efficiency 

The District information does not distinguish between non-catalytic and catalytic certified 

wood devices, but U.S. EPA’s guidance has the same net efficiency of 68 percent. 42 

There are two different pellet stove net efficiencies. The District certified and noncertified pellet devices were assumed to have net efficiency values of 68 and 56 

percent, respectively.43 

The gas device net efficiency is derived from U.S. EPA’s Burn Wise Fuel Efficiency 

Calculator. We took the more conservative net efficiency for Room Heater (Vented) 

which has a value of 65 percent. 44

38 http://www.eia.gov/neic/experts/heatcalc.xls 39 Ibid.

40 Ibid.

41 Pg. 5-6, http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ch01/final/c01s04.pdf 42 Ibid.

43 Ibid.

44 http://www.eia.gov/neic/experts/heatcalc.xls

 
Certified Pellet Device 

The following is the emission reduction credit, including referenced inputs, for replacing 

28 certified pellet devices with gas devices.

The following is the emission reduction credit, including referenced inputs, for replacing 

129 certified wood devices with either certified pellet or gas devices.

Activity Rate

To calculate the activity rate, staff utilized ARB’s Residential Wood Combustion 

documentation. The average consumption of wood in the District is 3.15 tons per 

household. 

Emission Factor

The emission factor for certified pellet device using pellets for NOx and PM2.5 is 3.8 

and 2.9 lb/ton fuel burned, respectively. 45 

The emission factor for gas device using natural gas for NOx and PM2.5 is 4.19 and 

0.34 lb/106 scf, respectively.46

Net Efficiency 

There are two different pellet stove net efficiencies. the District certified and noncertified pellet devices were assumed to have net efficiency values of 68 and 56 

percent, respectively.47 

The gas device net efficiency is derived from U.S. EPA’s Burn Wise Fuel Efficiency 

Calculator. Staff selected the more conservative net efficiency for Room Heater 

(Vented) which has a value of 65 percent. 48

45 Ibid.

46 Pg. 5-6, http://www.epa.gov/ttn/chief/ap42/ch01/final/c01s04.pdf 47 Ibid.

48 http://www.eia.gov/neic/experts/heatcalc.xls

 
Appendix B-1

1 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-13499-A Open hearth fireplace Certified wood insert

C-13625-A Open hearth fireplace Certified wood insert

C-18318-A Open hearth fireplace Certified wood insert

C-18488-A Open hearth fireplace Certified wood insert

C-18560-A Open hearth fireplace Certified wood insert

C-20179-A Open hearth fireplace Certified wood insert

C-22362-A Open hearth fireplace Certified wood insert

C-23206-A Open hearth fireplace Certified wood insert

C-24020-A Open hearth fireplace Certified wood insert

C-24271-A Open hearth fireplace Certified wood insert

C-24373-A Open hearth fireplace Certified wood insert

C-26786-A Open hearth fireplace Certified wood insert

C-26905-A Open hearth fireplace Certified wood insert

C-26906-A Open hearth fireplace Certified wood insert

C-26930-A Open hearth fireplace Certified wood insert

C-26933-A Open hearth fireplace Certified wood insert

C-26969-A Open hearth fireplace Certified wood insert

C-27014-A Open hearth fireplace Certified wood insert

C-27243-A Open hearth fireplace Certified wood insert

C-27264-A Open hearth fireplace Certified wood insert

C-27332-A Open hearth fireplace Certified wood insert

C-27740-A Open hearth fireplace Certified wood insert

C-27803-A Open hearth fireplace Certified wood insert

C-28448-A Open hearth fireplace Certified wood insert

C-3396-A Open hearth fireplace Certified wood insert

C-3510-A Open hearth fireplace Certified wood insert

C-3519-A Open hearth fireplace Certified wood insert

C-3582-A Open hearth fireplace Freestanding certified wood stove

C-3751-A Open hearth fireplace Certified wood insert

C-3778-A Open hearth fireplace Certified wood insert

C-3817-A Open hearth fireplace Certified wood insert

C-3836-A Open hearth fireplace Certified wood insert

C-3871-A Open hearth fireplace Certified wood insert

C-3872-A Open hearth fireplace Certified wood insert

C-4281-A Open hearth fireplace Certified wood insert

C-4423-A Open hearth fireplace Certified wood insert

C-4438-A Open hearth fireplace Certified wood insert

C-5683-A Open hearth fireplace Certified wood insert

C-7033-A Open hearth fireplace Certified wood insert

C-7234-A Open hearth fireplace Certified wood insert

C-9019-A Open hearth fireplace Certified wood insert

F-0064 Open hearth fireplace Certified wood insert

F-0144 Open hearth fireplace Certified wood insert

F-0187 Open hearth fireplace Certified wood insert

F-0188 Open hearth fireplace Certified wood insert

F-0190 Open hearth fireplace Certified wood insert

F-0196 Open hearth fireplace Certified wood insert

SJVAPCD Administered SIP Creditable Incentive Project List

Open hearth fireplace to Certified wood device
Appendix B-1

2 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

F-0211 Open hearth fireplace Freestanding certified wood stove

F-0224 Open hearth fireplace Certified wood insert

C-13626-A Open hearth fireplace Freestanding certified pellet stove

C-14903-A Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

C-15598-A Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

C-15978-A Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

C-16675-A Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

C-16952-A Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

C-17255-A Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

C-17431-A Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

C-17439-A Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

C-17884-A Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

C-17885-A Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

C-17903-A Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

C-17945-A Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

C-17977-A Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

C-17983-A Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

C-17984-A Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

C-18017-A Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

C-18068-A Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

C-18135-A Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

C-18255-A Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

C-18891-A Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

C-19346-A Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

C-19410-A Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

C-20411-A Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

C-20788-A Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

C-21140-A Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

C-21661-A Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

C-21664-A Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

C-21797-A Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

C-21952-A Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

C-21967-A Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

C-22688-A Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

C-22690-A Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

C-22863-A Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

C-23217-A Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

C-23234-A Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

C-23290-A Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

C-23322-A Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

C-23398-A Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

C-23460-A Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

C-23988-A Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

C-24379-A Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

C-27016-A Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

C-27328-A Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

C-27456-A Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

Open hearth fireplace to Certified pellet device
Appendix B-1

3 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-27656-A Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

C-28027-A Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

C-28162-A Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

C-28793-A Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

C-3454-A Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

C-3466-A Open hearth fireplace Freestanding certified pellet stove

C-3469-A Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

C-3480-A Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

C-3503-A Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

C-3761-A Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

C-4407-A Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

C-4457-A Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

C-4485-A Open hearth fireplace Freestanding certified pellet stove

C-4508-A Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

C-4545-A Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

C-5686-A Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

C-5856-A Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

C-6705-A Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

C-6734-A Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

C-7090-A Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

C-7203-A Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

C-7330-A Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

C-7334-A Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

C-7460-A Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

C-7529-A Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

F-0057 Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

F-0076 Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

F-0077 Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

F-0087 Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

F-0266 Open hearth fireplace Certified pellet insert

C-10011-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-10012-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-10014-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-10043-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-10044-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-10045-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-10048-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Fireplace (pre-authorization required)

C-10049-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-10050-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-10066-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-10067-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-10070-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-10072-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-10074-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-10110-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-10111-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-10112-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

Open hearth fireplace to Gas device
Appendix B-1

4 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-10113-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-10742-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-10774-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-10780-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-12753-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-12757-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-12759-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-12760-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-13297-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-13299-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-13485-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-13488-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-13490-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-13491-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-13497-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-13544-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-13545-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-13628-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-13689-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-13692-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-13694-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-13695-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-13836-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-13838-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-13841-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-13842-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-13844-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-13845-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-13849-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-13998-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-14000-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-14054-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Fireplace (pre-authorization required)

C-14055-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-14057-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-14059-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-14148-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-14339-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-14342-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-14445-A Open hearth fireplace Freestanding gas stove

C-14550-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-14753-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-14902-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-14904-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-14932-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-15057-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-15058-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-15059-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-15143-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-15144-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert
Appendix B-1

5 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-15145-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-15146-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-15174-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-15196-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-15197-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-15272-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-15273-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-15274-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-15276-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-15278-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-15323-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-15394-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-15397-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-15398-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-15399-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-15440-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-15442-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-15484-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-15485-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-15536-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-15537-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-15538-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-15539-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-15600-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-15603-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-15606-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-15608-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-15697-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-15698-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-15699-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-15700-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Fireplace (pre-authorization required)

C-15701-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-15703-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-15754-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-15755-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-15756-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-15759-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-15760-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-15762-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-15971-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-15972-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-15973-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-15974-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-15976-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-16071-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-16072-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-16073-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-16075-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-16078-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Fireplace (pre-authorization required)
Appendix B-1

6 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-16080-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Fireplace (pre-authorization required)

C-16081-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-16082-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-16212-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-16213-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-16215-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-16355-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-16356-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-16357-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-16360-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-16366-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-16432-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-16433-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-16434-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-16436-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-16514-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-16515-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-16516-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-16568-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-16571-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-16573-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-16632-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-16634-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-16636-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-16637-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-16638-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-16640-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-16641-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-16678-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-16735-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-16736-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-16738-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-16739-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-16740-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-16847-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-16848-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-16850-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-16851-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-16852-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-16853-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-16854-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-16943-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-16953-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17042-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17043-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17044-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17046-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17047-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17048-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert
Appendix B-1

7 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-17051-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17052-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17054-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17055-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17056-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17057-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17059-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17060-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17061-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17062-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17064-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17065-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17066-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17104-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17105-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17106-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17108-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17109-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17114-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17115-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17116-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17120-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17121-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17122-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17124-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17125-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17126-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17127-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17250-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17252-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17253-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17254-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17294-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17295-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17351-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17354-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17356-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17357-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17359-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17362-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17420-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17429-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17432-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17434-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17435-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17436-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17437-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17438-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17441-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert
Appendix B-1

8 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-17442-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17444-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17495-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17498-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17499-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17503-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17543-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17544-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17545-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17649-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17651-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17652-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17653-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17654-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17655-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17656-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17659-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17660-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17679-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17681-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17682-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17683-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17745-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17746-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17747-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17748-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17749-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17751-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17752-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17771-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17772-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17773-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17774-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17775-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17776-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17778-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17779-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17780-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17781-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17782-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17783-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17785-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17791-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17792-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17793-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17813-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17815-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17817-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17819-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert
Appendix B-1

9 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-17820-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17847-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17848-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17851-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17852-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17853-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17862-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17863-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17866-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17868-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17869-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17870-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17873-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17874-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17877-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17878-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17879-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17880-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17881-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17882-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17883-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Fireplace (pre-authorization required)

C-17888-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17889-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17892-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17893-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17894-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17897-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17898-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17899-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17900-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17901-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17904-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17908-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17920-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17922-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17934-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17935-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17936-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17939-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17944-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17947-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17948-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17949-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17951-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17953-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17955-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17956-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17957-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17961-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert
Appendix B-1

10 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-17962-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17970-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17971-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17973-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17974-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17976-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17978-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17979-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17980-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17981-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17982-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17985-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17986-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17987-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17988-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17989-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17991-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17992-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17994-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17996-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-17999-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18001-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18004-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18005-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18006-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18012-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18013-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18014-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18015-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18016-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18020-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18021-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18035-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18037-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18038-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18042-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18043-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18046-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18047-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18050-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18051-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18052-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18053-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18054-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18059-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18061-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18065-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18067-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18070-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert
Appendix B-1

11 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-18071-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18074-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18075-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18076-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18077-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18080-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18081-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18082-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18091-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18092-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18094-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18095-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18096-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18098-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18099-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18110-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18111-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18113-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18114-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18115-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18116-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18129-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18131-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18133-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18136-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18137-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18141-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18143-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18146-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18147-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18148-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18149-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18151-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18154-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18156-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18157-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18158-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18159-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18160-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18161-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18162-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18163-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18167-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18168-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18170-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18171-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18175-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18177-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18178-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert
Appendix B-1

12 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-18179-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18213-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18215-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18231-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18232-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18234-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18235-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18236-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18237-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18238-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18239-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18240-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18242-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18245-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18246-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18247-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18248-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18248-B Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18249-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18252-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18253-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18254-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18257-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18258-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18259-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18283-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18285-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18287-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18289-A Open hearth fireplace Freestanding gas stove

C-18290-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18291-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18292-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18292-B Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18293-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18294-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18296-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18297-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18309-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18311-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18312-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18315-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18317-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18319-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18320-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18335-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18337-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18339-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18340-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18343-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert
Appendix B-1

13 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-18344-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18345-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18346-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18348-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18349-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18352-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18353-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18354-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18356-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18357-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18358-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18360-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18361-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18379-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18380-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18381-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18382-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18396-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18397-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18398-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18400-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18409-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18410-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18412-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18414-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18416-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18417-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18418-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18420-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18428-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18429-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18430-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18431-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18434-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18453-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18454-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18456-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18457-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18460-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Fireplace (pre-authorization required)

C-18461-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18462-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18464-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18465-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18469-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18470-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18471-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18473-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18475-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18504-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert
Appendix B-1

14 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-18505-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18507-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18508-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18509-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18524-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18525-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18526-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18528-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18529-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18530-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Fireplace (pre-authorization required)

C-18531-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18533-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18534-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18539-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18557-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18558-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18559-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18561-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18562-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18563-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18564-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18565-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18567-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18569-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Fireplace (pre-authorization required)

C-18586-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18588-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18590-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Fireplace (pre-authorization required)

C-18591-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18594-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18595-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18596-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18597-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18598-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18606-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18607-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18608-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18609-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18610-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18613-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18614-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18625-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18626-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18626-B Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18638-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18640-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18642-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18653-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18654-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18655-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert
Appendix B-1

15 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-18656-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18657-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18658-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18659-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18660-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18661-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18662-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18664-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18682-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18711-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18712-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18713-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18714-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18717-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18717-B Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18718-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18736-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18737-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18738-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18739-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18740-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18741-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18742-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18743-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18747-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18748-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18759-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18764-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18765-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18781-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18782-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18783-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18784-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18785-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18786-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18787-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18805-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18814-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18815-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18829-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18831-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18832-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18834-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18835-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18836-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18837-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18838-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18840-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18852-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert
Appendix B-1

16 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-18853-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18854-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18856-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18868-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18869-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18883-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18884-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18885-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18890-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18893-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18896-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18897-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18924-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18925-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18941-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18942-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18944-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18946-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18949-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18953-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18954-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18955-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18957-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18969-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18970-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18971-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-18972-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19006-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19007-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19008-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19010-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19011-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19014-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19015-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19016-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19019-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19020-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19022-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19037-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19038-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19041-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19059-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19060-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19061-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19062-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19063-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19075-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19076-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19078-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert
Appendix B-1

17 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-19079-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19080-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19101-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19102-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19103-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19104-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19119-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19120-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19121-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19134-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19135-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19137-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19138-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19139-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19140-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19164-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19165-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19166-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19167-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19168-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19169-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19182-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19183-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19194-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19195-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19196-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19227-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19230-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19238-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19247-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19248-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19265-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19296-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19313-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19328-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19330-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19331-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19345-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19378-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19379-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19380-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19381-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19411-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19451-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19454-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19455-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19498-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19499-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19501-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert
Appendix B-1

18 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-19550-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Fireplace (pre-authorization required)

C-19551-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19552-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19731-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19757-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19758-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19759-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19845-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19848-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19848-B Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19887-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19888-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19889-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19941-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19942-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19961-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19963-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19964-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-19981-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20010-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20012-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20013-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20032-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20033-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20034-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20036-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20095-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20096-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20097-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20098-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20161-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20198-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20199-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20200-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20203-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20211-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20228-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20239-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20249-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20250-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20254-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20286-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Fireplace (pre-authorization required)

C-20287-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20288-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20290-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Fireplace (pre-authorization required)

C-20291-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20297-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20316-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20335-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert
Appendix B-1

19 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-20336-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20342-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20344-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20347-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20363-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20412-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20414-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20415-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20416-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20417-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20436-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20465-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20480-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20481-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20482-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20483-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20506-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20509-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20510-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20527-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20528-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20529-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20530-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20552-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20561-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20563-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20568-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20593-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20599-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20602-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20624-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20676-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20677-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20678-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20679-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20680-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20682-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20683-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20684-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20707-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20708-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20709-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20711-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20752-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20753-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20754-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20755-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20757-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20758-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert
Appendix B-1

20 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-20759-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20760-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20761-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20762-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20764-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20783-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20784-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20785-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20786-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20787-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20814-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20815-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20816-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20818-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20819-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20820-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20821-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20822-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20823-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20824-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20858-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20860-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20862-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20863-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20864-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20865-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20866-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20911-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20913-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20915-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20917-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20919-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20934-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20935-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20937-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20939-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20940-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20941-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20942-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20943-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20946-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20947-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20948-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20949-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20950-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20975-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20976-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20978-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20979-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert
Appendix B-1

21 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-20981-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20982-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20983-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-20985-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21015-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21016-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21017-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21018-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21041-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21042-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21066-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21067-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21070-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21074-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21076-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21077-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21078-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21079-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21080-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21111-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21112-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21113-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21115-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21116-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21117-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21118-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21121-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21122-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21134-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21135-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21136-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21137-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21138-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21139-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Fireplace (pre-authorization required)

C-21142-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21143-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21217-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21218-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21220-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21221-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21222-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21223-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21224-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21227-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21230-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21231-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21416-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21418-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21419-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert
Appendix B-1

22 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-21421-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21426-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21427-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21428-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21429-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21492-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21611-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21612-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21621-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21624-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21629-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21630-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21632-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21633-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21634-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21636-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21637-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21639-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21663-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21665-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21667-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21669-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21670-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21671-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21773-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21776-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21777-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21778-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21779-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21780-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21781-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21782-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21783-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21787-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21788-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21789-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21790-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21791-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21793-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21796-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21798-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21800-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21802-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21803-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21805-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21844-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21845-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21852-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21853-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert
Appendix B-1

23 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-21855-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21895-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21927-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21931-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21933-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21934-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21935-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21936-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21938-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21939-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21941-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21946-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21948-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21949-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21950-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21953-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21954-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21957-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21960-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21963-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21965-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-21968-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22002-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22004-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22007-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22008-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22009-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22059-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22061-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22061-B Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22063-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22080-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22083-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22084-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22085-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22087-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22098-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22099-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22101-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22102-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22104-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22104-B Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22106-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22108-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22110-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22113-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22115-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22116-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22117-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert
Appendix B-1

24 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-22120-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22123-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22126-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22127-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22137-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22138-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22139-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22166-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22167-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22168-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22169-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22170-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22171-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22172-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22173-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22206-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22207-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22211-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22221-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22222-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22224-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22225-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22227-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22228-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22229-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22231-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22236-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22284-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22285-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Fireplace (pre-authorization required)

C-22286-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22290-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22291-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22292-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22293-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22295-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22297-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22298-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Fireplace (pre-authorization required)

C-22300-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22301-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22302-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22303-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22304-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22359-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22360-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22361-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22363-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22366-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22366-B Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22368-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert
Appendix B-1

25 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-22369-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22370-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22372-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22373-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22374-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22375-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22376-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22377-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22378-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22379-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22380-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22382-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22383-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22384-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22385-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22386-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22390-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22395-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22398-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22400-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22407-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22408-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22410-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22411-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22412-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22414-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22415-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22417-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22419-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22445-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22446-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22451-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22452-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22453-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22456-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22456-B Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22457-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22458-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22460-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22461-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22463-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22464-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22467-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22471-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22472-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22483-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22513-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22514-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22516-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert
Appendix B-1

26 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-22517-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22518-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22519-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22522-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22525-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22526-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22527-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22528-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22529-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22532-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22535-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22552-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22553-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22554-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22560-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22583-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22585-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22586-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22587-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22590-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22591-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22592-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22593-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22594-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22643-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22644-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22645-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22646-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22647-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22648-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22649-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22650-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22652-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22680-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22684-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22685-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22686-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22696-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22698-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22700-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22701-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22712-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22727-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22728-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22729-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22730-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22731-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22735-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22739-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert
Appendix B-1

27 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-22748-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22750-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22752-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22755-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22756-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22758-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22761-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22762-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22765-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22771-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22775-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22816-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22821-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22822-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22823-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22824-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22864-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22865-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22867-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Fireplace (pre-authorization required)

C-22868-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22869-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22870-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22872-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22873-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22911-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22917-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22919-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22925-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22957-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22958-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22959-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Fireplace (pre-authorization required)

C-22960-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22962-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22964-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22966-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22968-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22969-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Fireplace (pre-authorization required)

C-22970-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22972-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22976-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22977-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22978-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22979-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22981-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-22995-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23000-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23008-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23037-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23038-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert
Appendix B-1

28 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-23039-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23040-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23070-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23073-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23078-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23079-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23081-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23082-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23083-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23084-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23086-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23087-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23088-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23089-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23090-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23116-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23131-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23133-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23135-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23141-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23142-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23143-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23151-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23152-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23162-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23165-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23171-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23173-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23185-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23197-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23198-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23199-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23200-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23201-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23203-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23205-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23208-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23209-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23212-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23213-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23215-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23216-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23226-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23233-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23239-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23240-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23251-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23276-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23278-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert
Appendix B-1

29 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-23289-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23291-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23294-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23295-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23296-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23297-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23321-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23323-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23326-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23328-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23330-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23331-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23332-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23333-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23335-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23347-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23379-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23380-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23381-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Fireplace (pre-authorization required)

C-23382-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23384-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23399-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23427-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23428-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23430-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23434-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23435-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23437-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23438-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23439-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23440-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23441-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23444-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23450-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23451-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23452-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23454-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23455-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23457-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23458-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23459-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Fireplace (pre-authorization required)

C-23484-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23485-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23487-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23489-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23491-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23508-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23511-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23512-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert
Appendix B-1

30 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-23561-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23562-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23563-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23569-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23616-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23618-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23619-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23621-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23622-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23623-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23624-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23625-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23625-B Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23629-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23630-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23632-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23633-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23668-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23669-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23670-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23671-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23672-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23683-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23684-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23684-B Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23729-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23730-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23732-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23769-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23771-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23773-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23774-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23777-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23779-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23780-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23781-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23782-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23802-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23804-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23806-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23808-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23809-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23810-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23854-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23855-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23856-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23865-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23921-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23922-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert
Appendix B-1

31 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-23923-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23924-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23925-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23926-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23927-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23930-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23931-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23932-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23933-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23935-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23936-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23957-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23959-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23960-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23961-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23962-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23965-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23968-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23989-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23991-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23992-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-23996-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-24041-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Fireplace (pre-authorization required)

C-24043-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-24048-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-24067-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-24070-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-24104-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-24171-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-24173-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-24175-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-24176-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-24177-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-24178-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-24180-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-24183-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-24184-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-24224-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-24225-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-24226-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-24251-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-24253-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-24270-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-24291-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-24293-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-24299-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-24300-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-24301-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-24345-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert
Appendix B-1

32 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-24346-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-24352-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-24372-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-24377-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-24378-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-24380-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-24381-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-24382-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-24383-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-24411-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-24417-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-24461-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-24462-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-24505-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-24508-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-24509-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-24540-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Fireplace (pre-authorization required)

C-24569-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Fireplace (pre-authorization required)

C-24570-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-24584-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-24642-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-24671-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-24672-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-24715-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-24724-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-24772-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-24790-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-24793-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-24795-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-24816-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-24859-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-24862-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-24864-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-24926-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-24929-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-25044-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-25045-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-25085-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-25150-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-25158-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-25180-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-25181-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-25236-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-25238-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-25281-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-25298-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-25401-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-25431-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-25460-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert
Appendix B-1

33 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-25461-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-25488-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Fireplace (pre-authorization required)

C-25525-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-25549-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-25585-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-25656-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-25658-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-25662-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-25698-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-25700-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-25708-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-25727-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-25819-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-25853-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-25854-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Fireplace (pre-authorization required)

C-25909-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-25936-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-25938-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26016-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26017-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26018-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26020-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26046-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26056-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26057-B Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26082-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26084-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26086-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26099-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26102-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26107-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26108-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26110-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26114-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26115-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26116-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26137-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26138-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26165-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26166-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26207-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26208-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26209-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26237-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26238-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26239-A Open hearth fireplace Freestanding gas stove

C-26240-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26253-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26254-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert
Appendix B-1

34 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-26255-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26280-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26333-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Fireplace (pre-authorization required)

C-26334-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26336-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26337-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26341-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26366-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26392-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26414-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26416-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26417-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26418-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26437-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26484-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26485-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26487-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26489-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26490-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26498-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Fireplace (pre-authorization required)

C-26512-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26513-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26592-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26593-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26596-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26597-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26598-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26599-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26601-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26602-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26604-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26605-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26607-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26610-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26626-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26661-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26677-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26678-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26711-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26715-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26716-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26733-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26735-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26745-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26746-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26746-B Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26750-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26751-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26752-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert
Appendix B-1

35 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-26753-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26754-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26756-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26782-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26784-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26785-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26787-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26788-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26792-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26794-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26804-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26805-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26808-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26815-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26816-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26817-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26818-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26819-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26820-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26824-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26842-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26843-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26845-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26894-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26894-B Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26895-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26897-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26899-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26907-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26910-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26925-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26931-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26937-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26940-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26941-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26943-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26971-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26972-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26976-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-26981-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27001-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27013-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27069-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27070-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27073-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27100-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27204-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Fireplace (pre-authorization required)

C-27209-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Fireplace (pre-authorization required)

C-27210-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert
Appendix B-1

36 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-27211-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27212-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27216-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27217-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27219-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27225-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27226-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27259-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27262-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27263-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27266-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27293-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27295-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27296-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27297-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27298-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27300-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27301-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27317-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27319-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27322-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27323-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27325-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27327-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27329-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27346-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27347-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27348-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27349-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27350-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27354-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27355-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27356-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27357-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27359-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27360-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27404-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27405-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27406-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27407-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27409-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27410-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27411-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27412-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27413-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27414-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27414-B Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27415-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27416-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert
Appendix B-1

37 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-27417-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27418-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27419-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27420-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27421-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27448-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27449-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27450-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27454-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27455-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27457-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27470-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27473-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27481-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Fireplace (pre-authorization required)

C-27489-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27510-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27512-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27513-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27514-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27515-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27516-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27534-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27538-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27541-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27542-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27544-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27544-B Open hearth fireplace Gas Fireplace (pre-authorization required)

C-27546-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27547-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27548-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27549-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27551-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27556-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27557-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27589-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27591-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27592-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27593-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27594-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27595-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27596-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27597-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27598-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27601-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27602-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27603-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27604-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27605-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27606-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert
Appendix B-1

38 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-27647-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27648-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27649-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27650-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27653-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27654-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27657-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27658-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27661-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27663-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27665-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27666-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27731-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27732-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27733-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Fireplace (pre-authorization required)

C-27734-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27736-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27737-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27739-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27743-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27745-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27746-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27747-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27749-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27750-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27751-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27752-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27753-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27755-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27756-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27757-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27758-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27760-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27761-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27762-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27771-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27772-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27773-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27801-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27801-B Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27805-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27808-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27810-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27811-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27812-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27813-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27814-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27816-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27817-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert
Appendix B-1

39 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-27818-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27819-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27856-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27858-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27859-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27863-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27864-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27865-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27866-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27867-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27868-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27869-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27870-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27873-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27876-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27877-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27878-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27879-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27882-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27916-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27917-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27918-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27919-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27920-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27924-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27934-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27935-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27962-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27963-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27964-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27966-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27967-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27968-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27971-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27972-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27973-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27976-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-27977-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28021-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28024-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28025-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28028-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28029-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28030-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28034-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28036-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28054-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28057-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28059-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert
Appendix B-1

40 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-28061-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28064-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28066-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28069-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28070-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28071-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28072-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28078-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28079-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28081-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28087-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28088-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28089-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28090-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28091-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28092-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28094-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28098-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28099-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28100-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28101-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28121-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28122-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28126-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28127-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28128-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28130-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28132-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28133-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28134-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28135-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28136-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28137-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28138-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28139-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28140-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28142-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28144-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28149-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28157-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28161-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28179-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28185-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28189-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28190-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28191-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28192-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28223-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28224-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert
Appendix B-1

41 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-28226-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28227-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28228-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28229-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28230-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28231-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28232-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28447-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28452-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28453-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28457-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28457-B Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28460-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28532-A Open hearth fireplace Freestanding gas stove

C-28535-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28536-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28539-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28541-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28546-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28547-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28551-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28567-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28681-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28683-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28689-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28701-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28775-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28786-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28787-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Fireplace (pre-authorization required)

C-28794-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28796-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28849-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28907-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28917-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28955-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-28958-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-29220-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-29230-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-29289-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-29318-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-30053-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3350-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3351-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3351-B Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3352-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3353-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3357-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3358-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3359-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert
Appendix B-1

42 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-3360-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3361-A Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

C-3363-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3366-A Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

C-3368-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3369-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3370-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3372-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3373-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3375-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3378-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3380-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3382-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3385-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3386-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3387-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3392-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3394-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3395-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3399-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3400-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3401-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3402-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3403-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3404-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3405-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3406-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3408-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3409-A Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

C-3410-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3411-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3412-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3414-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3415-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3416-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3419-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3422-A Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

C-3423-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3424-A Open hearth fireplace Freestanding gas stove

C-3425-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3426-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3429-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3433-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3437-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3438-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3441-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3442-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3444-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3447-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert
Appendix B-1

43 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-3448-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3449-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3450-A Open hearth fireplace Freestanding gas stove

C-3452-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3455-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3460-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3461-A Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

C-3462-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3463-A Open hearth fireplace Freestanding gas stove

C-3465-A Open hearth fireplace Freestanding gas stove

C-3474-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3475-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3479-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3484-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3485-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3486-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3487-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3488-A Open hearth fireplace Freestanding gas stove

C-3492-A Open hearth fireplace Freestanding gas stove

C-3493-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3494-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3495-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3496-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3499-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3500-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3502-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3505-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3507-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3508-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3509-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3512-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3513-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3515-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3518-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3523-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3524-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3527-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3528-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3529-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3535-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3537-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3538-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3540-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3541-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3544-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3545-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3546-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3547-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3549-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert
Appendix B-1

44 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-3552-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3554-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3555-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3561-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3562-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3563-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3568-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3577-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3578-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3583-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3584-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3589-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3594-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3595-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3598-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3607-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3609-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3610-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3612-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3614-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3615-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3616-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3618-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3620-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3622-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3623-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3624-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3625-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3630-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3636-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3637-B Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3638-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3639-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3640-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3641-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3642-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3645-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3646-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3651-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3652-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3653-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3656-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3659-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3660-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3661-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3662-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3665-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3666-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3667-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert
Appendix B-1

45 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-3670-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3671-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3674-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3675-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3678-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3679-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3683-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3684-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3685-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3689-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3690-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3691-A Open hearth fireplace Freestanding gas stove

C-3695-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3696-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3698-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3699-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3700-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3706-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3709-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3710-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3711-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3714-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3715-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3717-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3719-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3723-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3724-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3727-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3728-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3729-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3730-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3738-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3740-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3741-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3742-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3744-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3749-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3752-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3757-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3759-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3760-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3762-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3763-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3764-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3768-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3769-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3771-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3772-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3773-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert
Appendix B-1

46 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-3774-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3775-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3783-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3795-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3797-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3798-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3803-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3804-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3807-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3808-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3809-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3811-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3813-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3814-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3819-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3820-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3826-A Open hearth fireplace Freestanding gas stove

C-3827-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3834-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3837-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3840-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3842-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3843-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3845-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3849-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3850-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3854-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3859-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3862-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3865-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3866-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3867-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3869-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3886-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3887-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3890-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3892-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3896-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3900-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3902-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3903-A Open hearth fireplace Freestanding gas stove

C-3907-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3908-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3909-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3910-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3912-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3921-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3927-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3933-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert
Appendix B-1

47 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-3934-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3946-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3954-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-3999-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4000-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4010-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4014-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4016-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4017-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4019-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4026-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4030-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4031-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4032-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4039-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4040-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4046-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4050-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4051-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4061-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4070-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4071-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4077-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4078-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4098-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4127-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4128-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4132-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4134-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4142-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4148-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4149-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4150-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4151-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4152-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4156-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4157-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4159-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4160-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4165-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4177-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4182-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4183-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4184-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4186-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4190-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4195-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4197-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4202-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert
Appendix B-1

48 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-4204-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4205-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4206-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4208-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4209-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4214-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4216-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4218-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4220-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4221-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4222-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4223-A Open hearth fireplace Freestanding gas stove

C-4224-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4240-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4242-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4245-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4246-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4247-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4248-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4249-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4250-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4261-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4262-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4264-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4269-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4271-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4272-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4275-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4278-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4279-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4280-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4282-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4283-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4284-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4286-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4288-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4293-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4294-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4300-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4304-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4305-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4306-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4307-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4308-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4309-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4310-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4311-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4312-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4313-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert
Appendix B-1

49 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-4314-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4315-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4316-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4319-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4322-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4324-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4329-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4334-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4338-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4339-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4341-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4342-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4343-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4344-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4345-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4346-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4347-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4349-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4350-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4370-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4384-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4388-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4403-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4404-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4408-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4413-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4414-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4415-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4416-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4417-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4418-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4420-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4422-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4424-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4425-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4426-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4427-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4433-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4434-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4435-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4437-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4440-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4442-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4443-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4444-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4445-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4448-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4449-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4450-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert
Appendix B-1

50 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-4455-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4458-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4459-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4461-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4463-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4464-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4471-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4472-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4473-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4477-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4478-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4480-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4481-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4482-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4483-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4484-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4486-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4488-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4493-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4494-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4495-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4496-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4497-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4498-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4499-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4502-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4503-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4506-A Open hearth fireplace Freestanding gas stove

C-4509-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4510-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4513-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4514-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4516-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4518-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4521-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4523-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4524-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4525-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4528-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4531-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4533-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Fireplace (pre-authorization required)

C-4534-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4536-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4537-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4538-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4539-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4541-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4542-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4543-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert
Appendix B-1

51 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-4544-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4546-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4550-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4553-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4555-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4557-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4567-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4568-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4569-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4570-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4571-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4572-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4573-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4574-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4577-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4643-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4647-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4651-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4656-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4660-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4663-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4732-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4735-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4741-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4742-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4743-A Open hearth fireplace Freestanding gas stove

C-4744-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4746-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4941-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-4943-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-5098-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-5154-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-5158-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-5160-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-5165-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-5166-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-5168-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-5170-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-5172-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-5174-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-5371-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-5372-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-5373-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-5376-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-5377-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-5379-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-5382-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-5383-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-5385-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert
Appendix B-1

52 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-5457-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-5459-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-5462-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-5466-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-5583-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-5585-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-5601-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-5620-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-5622-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-5636-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-5637-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-5638-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-5674-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-5675-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-5678-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-5685-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-5814-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-5816-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-5832-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-5847-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-5857-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-5911-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-5916-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-5922-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-6691-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-6695-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-6708-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-6712-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-6716-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-6721-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-6736-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-6739-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-6740-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-6741-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-6742-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-6900-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-6901-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-6903-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-6908-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7015-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7016-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7017-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7027-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7038-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7040-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7080-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7081-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7082-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7083-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert
Appendix B-1

53 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-7085-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7086-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7087-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7091-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7092-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7093-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7094-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7095-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7097-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7098-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7099-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7100-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7101-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7102-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7105-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7106-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7112-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7115-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7116-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7117-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7118-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7119-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7121-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7125-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7126-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7128-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7129-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7131-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7134-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7135-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7142-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7152-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7153-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7154-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7155-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7156-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7158-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7161-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7163-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7165-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7166-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7169-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7170-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7171-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7173-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7174-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7175-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7177-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7178-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert
Appendix B-1

54 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-7180-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7181-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Fireplace (pre-authorization required)

C-7183-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7184-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7185-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7186-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7191-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7193-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7194-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7197-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7198-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7199-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7201-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7202-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7204-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7227-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7228-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7232-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7236-B Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7237-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7238-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7240-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7241-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7242-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7254-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7255-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7256-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7258-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7259-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7260-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7261-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7262-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7263-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7264-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7265-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7266-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7267-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7275-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7276-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7277-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7279-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7281-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7282-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7283-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7308-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7310-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7312-A Open hearth fireplace Freestanding gas stove

C-7316-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7318-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert
Appendix B-1

55 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-7324-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7327-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7335-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7363-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7365-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7367-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7368-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Fireplace (pre-authorization required)

C-7371-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7374-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7375-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7376-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7377-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7390-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7392-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7394-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7395-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7396-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7397-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7398-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7399-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7401-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7405-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7414-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7416-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7417-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7419-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7420-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7421-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7422-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7424-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7425-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7427-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7456-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7457-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7458-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7459-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7488-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7489-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Fireplace (pre-authorization required)

C-7491-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7492-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7493-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7496-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7517-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7518-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7519-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7520-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7521-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7522-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7527-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert
Appendix B-1

56 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-7530-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7531-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7532-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7533-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7534-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7536-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7537-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7543-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7546-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7547-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7548-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7549-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7565-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7566-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7568-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7570-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7571-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7572-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7580-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7582-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7588-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7589-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7591-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7592-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7593-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7595-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7599-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7649-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7650-A Open hearth fireplace Freestanding gas stove

C-7651-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7652-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7653-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7654-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7656-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7678-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7679-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7682-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7683-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7690-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7693-A Open hearth fireplace Freestanding gas stove

C-7695-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7697-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7701-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7703-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7704-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7705-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7708-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7709-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7711-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert
Appendix B-1

57 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-7714-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7717-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7729-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7732-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7749-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7752-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7753-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7755-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7756-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7757-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7758-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7759-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7760-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7761-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7773-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7774-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7775-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7777-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7778-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7779-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7802-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7803-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7805-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7806-A Open hearth fireplace Freestanding gas stove

C-7814-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7815-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7817-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7819-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7821-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7822-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7823-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7824-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7825-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7827-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7832-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7834-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7867-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7869-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7870-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7873-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7902-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7916-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7926-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7927-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7929-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7931-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-7932-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-8015-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-8016-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert
Appendix B-1

58 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-8019-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-8021-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-8023-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-8024-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-8025-A Open hearth fireplace Freestanding gas stove

C-8171-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Fireplace (pre-authorization required)

C-8174-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-8177-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-8233-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-8234-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-8239-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-8240-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-8400-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-8656-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Fireplace (pre-authorization required)

C-8660-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Fireplace (pre-authorization required)

C-8665-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Fireplace (pre-authorization required)

C-8911-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-8915-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-8921-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9006-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9010-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Fireplace (pre-authorization required)

C-9011-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9012-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9013-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9015-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9016-A Open hearth fireplace Freestanding gas stove

C-9017-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9020-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9056-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9062-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9064-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9066-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9114-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9117-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9197-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9200-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9239-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9241-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9243-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9248-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9294-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9606-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9678-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9680-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9733-A Open hearth fireplace Freestanding gas stove

C-9740-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9744-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9745-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9746-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert
Appendix B-1

59 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-9747-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9748-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9771-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9773-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9774-A Open hearth fireplace Freestanding gas stove

C-9777-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9778-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9800-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9802-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9804-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9805-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9806-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9809-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9810-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9811-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9812-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9821-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9822-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9823-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9850-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9851-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9853-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9862-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9863-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9864-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9865-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9869-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9872-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9873-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9874-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9875-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9876-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9886-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9887-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9888-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Fireplace (pre-authorization required)

C-9890-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9891-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9892-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9904-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9906-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Fireplace (pre-authorization required)

C-9907-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9916-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9918-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9920-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9921-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9922-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9923-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9951-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9953-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert
Appendix B-1

60 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-9954-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9958-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9975-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9977-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9978-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9985-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

C-9986-A Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

F-0027 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0028 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0029 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0034 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0035 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0036 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0038 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0039 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0040 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0042 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0046 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0049 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0050 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0051 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0052 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0053 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0056 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0060 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0062 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0063 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0065 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0066 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0067 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0068 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0069 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0070 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0072 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0073 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0074 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0078 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0079 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0080 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0081 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0088 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0092 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0093 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0096 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0097 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0098 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0099 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0102 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0103 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert
Appendix B-1

61 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

F-0105 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0106 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0111 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0112 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0113 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0114 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0115 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0116 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0117 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0120 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0121 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0122 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0124 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0125 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0126 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0127 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0129 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0130 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0131 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0132 Open hearth fireplace Gas Insert

F-0137 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0138 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0139 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0142 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0143 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0145 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0146 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0148 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0149 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0152 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0155 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0156 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0157 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0158 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0164 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0169 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0177 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0180 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0181 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0183 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0189 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0192 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0193 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0198 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0200 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0203 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0206 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0221 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0244 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert
Appendix B-1

62 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

F-0253 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0264 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0265 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0267 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0268 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0270 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0271 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0272 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0273 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0274 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

F-0278 Open hearth fireplace Gas insert

C-14062-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding certified wood stove

C-17063-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding certified wood stove

C-17293-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding certified wood stove

C-17777-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding certified wood stove

C-17875-A Non-certified wood insert Certified wood insert

C-17921-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding certified wood stove

C-18570-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding certified wood stove

C-19732-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding certified wood stove

C-19847-A Non-certified wood insert Certified wood insert

C-23085-A Non-certified wood insert Certified wood insert

C-26901-A Non-certified wood insert Certified wood insert

C-27068-A Non-certified wood insert Certified wood insert

C-27472-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding certified wood stove

C-27881-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding certified wood stove

C-27923-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding certified wood stove

C-28062-A Non-certified wood insert Certified wood insert

C-3383-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding certified wood stove

C-3511-A Non-certified wood insert Certified wood insert

C-3531-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding certified wood stove

C-3557-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding certified wood stove

C-3755-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding certified wood stove

C-3799-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding certified wood stove

C-3802-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Certified wood insert

C-3885-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding certified wood stove

C-4155-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding certified wood stove

C-4217-A Non-certified wood insert Certified wood insert

C-4479-A Non-certified wood insert Certified wood insert

C-4490-A Non-certified wood insert Certified wood insert

C-6907-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding certified wood stove

C-7039-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding certified wood stove

C-7764-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding certified wood stove

C-7829-A Non-certified wood insert Certified wood insert

F-0026 Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding certified wood stove

F-0089 Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding certified wood stove

F-0090 Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding certified wood stove

F-0094 Non-certified wood insert Certified wood insert

Non-certified wood device to Certified wood device
Appendix B-1

63 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

F-0108 Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding certified wood stove

F-0140 Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding certified wood stove

F-0151 Non-certified wood insert Certified wood insert

F-0173 Freestanding non-certified wood stove Certified wood insert

F-0179 Freestanding non-certified wood stove Certified wood insert

F-0194 Non-certified wood insert Certified wood insert

F-0260 Non-certified wood insert Certified wood insert

C-13493-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding certified pellet stove

C-15975-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding certified pellet stove

C-17940-A Non-certified wood insert Certified pellet insert

C-18011-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding certified pellet stove

C-18153-A Non-certified wood insert Certified pellet insert

C-18169-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding certified pellet stove

C-18540-A Non-certified wood insert Certified pellet insert

C-23184-A Non-certified wood insert Certified pellet insert

C-26710-A Non-certified wood insert Certified pellet insert

C-26844-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding certified pellet stove

C-27475-A Non-certified wood insert Certified pellet insert

C-28883-A Non-certified wood insert Certified pellet insert

C-3348-A Non-certified wood insert Certified pellet insert

C-3446-A Non-certified wood insert Certified pellet insert

C-3870-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding certified pellet stove

C-4548-A Non-certified wood insert Certified pellet insert

C-5635-A Non-certified wood insert Certified pellet insert

C-5684-A Non-certified wood insert Certified pellet insert

C-5924-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding certified pellet stove

C-6904-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding certified pellet stove

C-7138-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding certified pellet stove

C-9679-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding certified pellet stove

F-0033 Non-certified wood insert Certified pellet insert

F-0071 Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding certified pellet stove

F-0100 Non-certified wood insert Freestanding certified pellet stove

F-0104 Non-certified wood insert Certified pellet insert

F-0135 Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding certified pellet stove

F-0300 Non-certified wood insert Certified pellet insert

C-10069-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-10071-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding gas stove

C-13548-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding gas stove

C-14053-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-14056-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-14931-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-15172-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-15175-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-15176-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-15319-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

Non-certified wood device to Certified pellet device

Non-certified wood device to Gas device
Appendix B-1

64 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-15322-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-15395-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-15396-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-15483-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-15977-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-16074-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-16083-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-16365-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-16513-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-16572-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-16679-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding gas stove

C-16954-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding gas stove

C-16955-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-17053-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-17117-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-17118-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-17251-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding gas stove

C-17360-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding gas stove

C-17446-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-17542-A Non-certified wood insert Freestanding gas stove

C-17658-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-17846-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-17937-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-17990-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-17995-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-17998-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-18041-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-18069-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-18145-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-18152-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-18165-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-18176-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-18243-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-18260-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-18284-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-18286-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-18295-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding gas stove

C-18355-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-18378-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-18419-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-18532-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-18535-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-18641-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-18652-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-18762-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-18763-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-18766-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-18779-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-18830-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert
Appendix B-1

65 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-18870-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-18943-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding gas stove

C-18951-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding gas stove

C-19013-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-19021-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding gas stove

C-19040-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-19184-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-19314-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-19477-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding gas stove

C-19615-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding gas stove

C-19617-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-19618-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-19979-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-19997-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-20094-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-20343-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding gas stove

C-20464-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-20507-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-20511-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-20675-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-20756-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Gas Fireplace (pre-authorization required)

C-20763-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-20781-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-20859-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-20912-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-20914-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-20916-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-20918-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-20938-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding gas stove

C-20945-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding gas stove

C-20980-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-20984-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-21068-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-21069-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-21234-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-21417-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-21422-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-21424-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-21609-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-21619-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-21627-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-21775-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-21799-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding gas stove

C-21849-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-21926-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-21955-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-21958-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding gas stove

C-21964-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-22011-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert
Appendix B-1

66 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-22012-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-22082-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-22134-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-22136-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-22234-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-22294-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-22371-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-22418-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-22515-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-22521-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-22584-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-22589-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-22678-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-22956-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-22974-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-22994-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding gas stove

C-23080-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding gas stove

C-23172-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-23210-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-23218-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-23219-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-23220-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-23237-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Fireplace (pre-authorization required)

C-23252-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-23348-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-23429-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-23486-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-23488-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-23509-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-23628-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding gas stove

C-23778-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding gas stove

C-23803-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-23929-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-23934-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-23963-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-23990-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding gas stove

C-23994-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding gas stove

C-24045-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-24128-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-24157-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-24217-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Fireplace (pre-authorization required)

C-24252-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-24711-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Gas Insert

C-24771-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-24995-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-25235-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding gas stove

C-25486-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-25487-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-25545-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding gas stove
Appendix B-1

67 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-25657-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-25852-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-25865-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding gas stove

C-25918-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-25991-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-26085-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-26335-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-26488-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-26491-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-26499-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-26600-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-26603-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-26608-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-26609-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-26611-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-26780-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-26781-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-26783-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-26789-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding gas stove

C-26790-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-26802-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-26822-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-26896-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-26904-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-26908-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-26975-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-27012-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding gas stove

C-27218-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-27222-B Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-27223-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding gas stove

C-27330-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-27361-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-27444-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-27452-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-27467-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-27491-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-27509-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-27540-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-27550-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-27599-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-27652-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-27735-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-27802-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-27806-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-27807-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-27860-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding gas stove

C-27883-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-27965-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-27969-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert
Appendix B-1

68 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-27975-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-28011-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-28129-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-28145-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-28160-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-28193-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-28454-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-28531-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-3354-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-3356-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-3362-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-3365-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-3377-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-3381-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-3421-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-3432-A Non-certified wood insert Freestanding gas stove

C-3435-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-3440-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-3453-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-3467-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-3490-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-3491-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-3548-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-3588-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Gas Insert

C-3596-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-3597-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-3599-A Non-certified wood insert Freestanding gas stove

C-3621-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-3627-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-3628-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-3629-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-3631-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Gas Insert

C-3643-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-3650-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-3654-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-3655-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding gas stove

C-3658-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-3707-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-3733-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-3770-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-3835-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-3841-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-3858-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding gas stove

C-3860-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-3878-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-3881-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-3891-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-3904-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-3911-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert
Appendix B-1

69 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-3922-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-4049-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-4065-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-4191-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-4196-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding gas stove

C-4210-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-4225-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-4241-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-4268-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-4292-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-4295-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-4297-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-4298-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-4301-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-4303-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-4318-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-4336-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-4340-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Gas Fireplace (pre-authorization required)

C-4366-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding gas stove

C-4383-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-4385-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-4389-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-4421-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-4432-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-4453-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-4462-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Fireplace (pre-authorization required)

C-4469-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding gas stove

C-4505-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-4512-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-4527-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-4530-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-4535-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-4547-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-4551-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding gas stove

C-5101-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-6735-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-6909-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-7026-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding gas stove

C-7077-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-7096-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-7111-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Gas Insert

C-7127-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-7143-A Non-certified wood insert Freestanding gas stove

C-7176-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-7333-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-7364-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-7370-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding gas stove

C-7393-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding gas stove

C-7426-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert
Appendix B-1

70 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-7535-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-7545-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-7567-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-7569-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-7596-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-7598-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-7677-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding gas stove

C-7723-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-7804-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-7871-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-8172-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding gas stove

C-8399-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding gas stove

C-8668-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-9063-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-9808-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-9871-A Non-certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-9905-A Freestanding non-certified wood stove Gas Insert

F-0043 Non-certified wood insert Gas insert

F-0045 Non-certified wood insert Gas insert

F-0058 Non-certified wood insert Gas insert

F-0059 Non-certified wood insert Gas insert

F-0061 Non-certified wood insert Gas insert

F-0085 Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding gas stove

F-0086 Non-certified wood insert Gas insert

F-0091 Non-certified wood insert Gas insert

F-0095 Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding gas stove

F-0101 Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding gas stove

F-0136 Non-certified wood insert Gas insert

F-0153 Non-certified wood insert Gas insert

F-0160 Non-certified wood insert Gas insert

F-0168 Non-certified wood insert Gas insert

F-0199 Freestanding non-certified wood stove Freestanding gas stove

F-0204 Non-certified wood insert Gas insert

F-0205 Non-certified wood insert Gas insert

F-0208 Non-certified wood insert Gas insert

F-0263 Non-certified wood insert Gas insert

F-0275 Non-certified wood insert Gas insert

F-0289 Non-certified wood insert Gas insert

C-14446-A Non-certified pellet insert Certified pellet insert

C-20936-A Non-certified pellet insert Certified pellet insert

C-10109-A Non-certified pellet insert Gas Insert

C-17895-A Non-certified pellet insert Gas Insert

C-18048-A Non-certified pellet insert Gas Insert

C-18144-A Non-certified pellet insert Gas Insert

C-18316-A Non-certified pellet insert Gas Insert

Non-certified pellet device to Certified pellet device

Non-certified pellet device to Gas device
Appendix B-1

71 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-18338-A Non-certified pellet insert Gas Insert

C-18881-A Non-certified pellet insert Gas Fireplace (pre-authorization required)

C-18895-A Non-certified pellet insert Gas Insert

C-19005-A Non-certified pellet insert Gas Insert

C-19012-A Non-certified pellet insert Gas Insert

C-20627-A Freestanding non-certified pellet stove Freestanding gas stove

C-21133-A Non-certified pellet insert Gas Insert

C-21792-A Non-certified pellet insert Gas Insert

C-22759-A Non-certified pellet insert Gas Insert

C-23236-A Non-certified pellet insert Gas Insert

C-23557-A Non-certified pellet insert Gas Insert

C-23993-A Non-certified pellet insert Gas Insert

C-24773-A Non-certified pellet insert Gas Insert

C-25587-A Non-certified pellet insert Gas Insert

C-25588-A Non-certified pellet insert Gas Insert

C-26791-A Non-certified pellet insert Gas Insert

C-26806-A Non-certified pellet insert Gas Insert

C-26807-A Non-certified pellet insert Gas Insert

C-26911-A Non-certified pellet insert Gas Insert

C-27742-A Non-certified pellet insert Gas Insert

C-27970-A Non-certified pellet insert Gas Insert

C-3413-A Freestanding non-certified pellet stove Freestanding gas stove

C-3434-A Freestanding non-certified pellet stove Freestanding gas stove

C-3476-A Non-certified pellet insert Gas Insert

C-3542-A Freestanding non-certified pellet stove Gas Insert

C-3673-A Non-certified pellet insert Gas Insert

C-3677-A Non-certified pellet insert Gas Insert

C-3725-A Non-certified pellet insert Gas Insert

C-3766-A Non-certified pellet insert Gas Insert

C-4145-A Non-certified pellet insert Gas Insert

C-4456-A Freestanding non-certified pellet stove Gas Insert

C-4470-A Freestanding non-certified pellet stove Freestanding gas stove

C-6744-A Freestanding non-certified pellet stove Freestanding gas stove

C-7230-A Non-certified pellet insert Gas Insert

C-7487-A Non-certified pellet insert Gas Insert

C-8906-A Non-certified pellet insert Gas Insert

C-9014-A Non-certified pellet insert Gas Insert

F-0047 Non-certified pellet insert Gas insert

F-0082 Non-certified pellet insert Gas insert

F-0141 Non-certified pellet insert Gas insert

F-0277 Non-certified pellet insert Gas insert

C-10778-A Freestanding certified wood stove Freestanding certified pellet stove

C-13839-A Freestanding certified wood stove Freestanding certified pellet stove

C-15324-A Certified wood insert Certified pellet insert

C-23334-A Certified wood insert Certified pellet insert

C-25523-A Certified wood insert Certified pellet insert

C-3572-A Freestanding certified wood stove Certified pellet insert

Certified wood device to Certified pellet device
Appendix B-1

72 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-3735-A Freestanding certified wood stove Freestanding certified pellet stove

F-0261 Certified wood insert Certified pellet insert

C-12751-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-13997-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-14149-A Freestanding certified wood stove Freestanding gas stove

C-15158-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-15275-A Freestanding certified wood stove Freestanding gas stove

C-15320-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-15441-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-15601-A Freestanding certified wood stove Freestanding gas stove

C-17045-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-17887-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-17907-A Freestanding certified wood stove Freestanding gas stove

C-17946-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-18130-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-18230-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-18233-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-18313-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-18336-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-18342-A Freestanding certified wood stove Freestanding gas stove

C-18359-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-18455-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-18466-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-18467-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-18490-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-18527-A Freestanding certified wood stove Freestanding gas stove

C-18922-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-18948-A Freestanding certified wood stove Freestanding gas stove

C-18956-A Freestanding certified wood stove Freestanding gas stove

C-19105-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-19553-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-19614-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-20149-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-20231-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-20831-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-21229-A Freestanding certified wood stove Freestanding gas stove

C-21423-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-21638-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-22079-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-22205-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-22747-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-23132-A Freestanding certified wood stove Freestanding gas stove

C-23442-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-23453-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-23560-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-23686-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-23918-A Freestanding certified wood stove Freestanding gas stove

Certified pellet device to Gas device
Appendix B-1

73 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-24044-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-24385-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-24863-A Freestanding certified wood stove Freestanding gas stove

C-25020-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-25586-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-25979-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-26057-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-26194-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-26281-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-26464-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-26483-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-26757-A Freestanding certified wood stove Freestanding gas stove

C-26793-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-27258-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-27345-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-27362-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-27474-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-27482-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-27511-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-27529-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-27558-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-27590-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-27764-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-28172-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-28702-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-3364-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-3364-B Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-3371-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-3379-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-3388-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-3451-A Certified wood insert Freestanding gas stove

C-3482-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-3564-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-3648-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-3687-A Freestanding certified wood stove Gas Insert

C-3731-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-3765-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-3780-A Certified wood insert Freestanding gas stove

C-3781-A Freestanding certified wood stove Freestanding gas stove

C-3810-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-3815-A Freestanding certified wood stove Gas Insert

C-3822-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-3823-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-3844-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-3856-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-3929-A Freestanding certified wood stove Freestanding gas stove

C-3945-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-4048-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-4185-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert
Appendix B-1

74 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-4198-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-4289-A Freestanding certified wood stove Freestanding gas stove

C-4290-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-4406-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-4465-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-4507-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-4520-A Freestanding certified wood stove Freestanding gas stove

C-4529-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-4549-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-5368-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-6902-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-7021-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-7084-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-7133-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-7366-A Freestanding certified wood stove Gas Insert

C-7415-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-7702-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-8402-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-9609-A Freestanding certified wood stove Freestanding gas stove

C-9617-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-9772-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

C-9866-A Freestanding certified wood stove Freestanding gas stove

C-9919-A Certified wood insert Gas Insert

F-0118 Certified wood insert Gas insert

F-0119 Certified wood insert Gas insert

F-0209 Freestanding certified wood stove Gas insert

F-0259 Certified wood insert Gas insert

C-15321-A Certified pellet insert Freestanding gas stove

C-18132-A Certified pellet insert Gas Insert

C-18241-A Certified pellet insert Gas Insert

C-18341-A Certified pellet insert Gas Insert

C-18833-A Certified pellet insert Gas Insert

C-18866-A Certified pellet insert Gas Insert

C-18886-A Certified pellet insert Gas Insert

C-20626-A Certified pellet insert Gas Fireplace (pre-authorization required)

C-20710-A Certified pellet insert Gas Insert

C-20944-A Certified pellet insert Gas Insert

C-20977-A Certified pellet insert Gas Insert

C-21615-A Certified pellet insert Gas Insert

C-24105-A Certified pellet insert Gas Insert

C-26419-A Certified pellet insert Gas Insert

C-26714-A Certified pellet insert Gas Insert

C-27215-A Certified pellet insert Gas Insert

C-27872-A Freestanding certified pellet stove Gas Insert

C-3526-A Certified pellet insert Freestanding gas stove

C-3669-A Certified pellet insert Freestanding gas stove

C-3782-A Certified pellet insert Gas Insert

Certified pellet device to Gas device
Appendix B-1

75 SJV Woodstove Changeout Project List

Project 

Number Old Device New Device

C-4203-A Certified pellet insert Gas Insert

C-4317-A Freestanding certified pellet stove Gas Insert

C-9065-A Certified pellet insert Gas Insert

F-0030 Certified pellet insert Freestanding gas stove

F-0037 Certified pellet insert Gas insert

F-0044 Certified pellet insert Gas insert

F-0191 Certified pellet insert Gas insert

F-0212 Certified pellet insert Gas insert
Appendix B-2

Indirect Source Review On-Site Project List 1

Project 

Year Project ID Project Type

Onsite NOX

 Reduction 

(tons per 

year)

Onsite Dust 

 Reduction 

(tons per 

year)

Onsite Exhaust 

Reduction (tons 

per year)

2006 20060005 RESIDENTIAL 0.96 0.32 0.00

2006 20060015 RESIDENTIAL 0.62 0.34 0.00

2006 20060016 RESIDENTIAL 1.28 0.85 0.00

2006 20060017 RESIDENTIAL 0.45 0.20 0.00

2006 20060022 RESIDENTIAL 1.92 0.72 0.00

2006 20060023 RESIDENTIAL 0.80 0.40 0.00

2006 20060026 RESIDENTIAL 0.63 0.21 0.00

2006 20060029 RESIDENTIAL 5.28 2.08 0.00

2006 20060030 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.09 0.09 0.00

2006 20060034 RESIDENTIAL 2.33 3.15 0.24

2006 20060035 RESIDENTIAL 1.61 2.14 0.17

2006 20060036 RESIDENTIAL 1.51 0.80 0.00

2006 20060047 NONRESIDENTIAL 11.12 4.32 0.00

2006 20060048 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.32 0.16 0.00

2006 20060051 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.99 0.36 0.00

2006 20060084 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.56 0.21 0.00

2006 20060097 RESIDENTIAL 2.56 0.85 0.03

2006 20060098 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.42 0.07 0.00

2006 20060099 RESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2006 20060100 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.27 0.09 0.00

2006 20060101 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.24 0.08 0.00

2006 20060102 NONRESIDENTIAL 405.84 28.96 0.00

2006 20060103 NONRESIDENTIAL 151.28 12.48 0.00

2006 20060113 RESIDENTIAL 1.62 0.78 0.00

2006 20060114 RESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2006 20060116 RESIDENTIAL 0.93 0.50 0.00

2006 20060117 RESIDENTIAL 0.98 0.50 0.00

2006 20060121 RESIDENTIAL 3.36 1.71 0.00

2006 20060123 RESIDENTIAL 2.00 1.00 0.00

2006 20060124 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.12 0.48 0.00

2006 20060126 RESIDENTIAL 0.88 0.56 0.00

2006 20060127 RESIDENTIAL 0.32 0.23 0.00

2006 20060129 RESIDENTIAL 0.80 0.43 0.00

2006 20060135 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.12 0.49 0.00

2006 20060136 RESIDENTIAL 2.48 1.22 0.00

2006 20060137 RESIDENTIAL 2.68 1.53 0.00

2006 20060144 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.15 0.07 0.00

2006 20060148 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2006 20060150 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.16 0.00 0.00

2006 20060151 RESIDENTIAL 1.70 0.83 0.00

2006 20060155 RESIDENTIAL 1.61 1.16 0.00

2006 20060156 RESIDENTIAL 2.05 1.48 0.00

2006 20060157 RESIDENTIAL 1.20 0.56 0.00

2006 20060158 RESIDENTIAL 0.77 0.64 0.00

2006 20060159 RESIDENTIAL 2.80 1.47 0.00

2006 20060161 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.16 0.08 0.00

2006 20060162 RESIDENTIAL 0.35 0.22 0.00

Emission Reductions for Approved ISR Projects 

 (Construction Start Date Before 12/31/2013)

 (2014 Reductions)
Appendix B-2

Indirect Source Review On-Site Project List 2

Project 

Year Project ID Project Type

Onsite NOX

 Reduction 

(tons per 

year)

Onsite Dust 

 Reduction 

(tons per 

year)

Onsite Exhaust 

Reduction (tons 

per year)

2006 20060168 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.12 0.40 0.00

2006 20060169 RESIDENTIAL 1.20 0.65 0.00

2006 20060170 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.44 0.64 0.00

2006 20060171 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.08 0.00 0.00

624.16 76.51 0.44

2007 20070178 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.64 0.24 0.00

2007 20070179 RESIDENTIAL 1.26 0.66 0.00

2007 20070183 NONRESIDENTIAL 17.76 5.20 0.00

2007 20070184 RESIDENTIAL 0.70 0.40 0.00

2007 20070185 RESIDENTIAL 1.07 0.71 0.00

2007 20070187 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2007 20070191 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.12 0.40 0.00

2007 20070193 RESIDENTIAL 3.15 5.32 0.00

2007 20070194 RESIDENTIAL 0.32 0.16 0.00

2007 20070195 NONRESIDENTIAL 35.21 14.70 0.00

2007 20070198 RESIDENTIAL 1.88 0.79 0.00

2007 20070199 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2007 20070200 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2007 20070202 MIXED USE 5.18 2.03 0.00

2007 20070207 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2007 20070211 RESIDENTIAL 2.02 1.17 0.00

2007 20070213 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.24 0.08 0.00

2007 20070214 RESIDENTIAL 3.22 1.76 0.00

2007 20070215 RESIDENTIAL 1.38 0.78 0.00

2007 20070216 RESIDENTIAL 8.36 6.29 0.25

2007 20070218 RESIDENTIAL 0.64 0.34 0.00

2007 20070222 RESIDENTIAL 0.40 0.27 0.00

2007 20070223 RESIDENTIAL 0.96 0.51 0.00

2007 20070224 RESIDENTIAL 2.40 1.13 0.00

2007 20070225 NONRESIDENTIAL 8.00 3.56 0.00

2007 20070230 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.24 0.08 0.00

2007 20070232 NONRESIDENTIAL 4.81 2.43 0.00

2007 20070245 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.08 0.08 0.00

2007 20070248 RESIDENTIAL 0.53 0.29 0.00

2007 20070250 RESIDENTIAL 22.16 10.78 0.00

2007 20070254 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 0.00 0.00 0.00

2007 20070256 RESIDENTIAL 1.60 0.80 0.00

2007 20070258 MIXED USE 0.00 0.00 0.00

2007 20070259 NONRESIDENTIAL 8.92 2.94 0.00

2007 20070260 NONRESIDENTIAL 14.14 4.98 0.00

2007 20070262 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.26 0.49 0.00

2007 20070263 RESIDENTIAL 1.39 0.75 0.00

2007 20070264 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.70 0.28 0.00

2007 20070266 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2007 20070267 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2007 20070268 RESIDENTIAL 0.63 0.28 0.00

2007 20070271 RESIDENTIAL 0.25 0.18 0.00

2007 20070272 RESIDENTIAL 0.03 0.03 0.00

2007 20070273 RESIDENTIAL 0.06 0.04 0.00

2007 20070274 RESIDENTIAL 0.78 0.52 0.00

2007 20070277 RESIDENTIAL 0.10 0.10 0.00

2006 Subtotal (tons per year)
Appendix B-2

Indirect Source Review On-Site Project List 3

Project 

Year Project ID Project Type

Onsite NOX

 Reduction 

(tons per 

year)

Onsite Dust 

 Reduction 

(tons per 

year)

Onsite Exhaust 

Reduction (tons 

per year)

2007 20070278 NONRESIDENTIAL 2.31 0.98 0.00

2007 20070281 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2007 20070284 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.36 0.56 0.00

2007 20070285 NONRESIDENTIAL 6.02 2.45 0.00

2007 20070286 RESIDENTIAL 0.12 0.11 0.00

2007 20070287 RESIDENTIAL 1.63 4.01 0.04

2007 20070288 NONRESIDENTIAL 9.94 4.13 0.00

2007 20070291 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.14 0.77 0.00

2007 20070294 NONRESIDENTIAL 28.17 9.71 0.33

2007 20070295 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.94 0.50 0.00

2007 20070297 RESIDENTIAL 1.57 0.77 0.00

2007 20070298 MIXED USE 0.00 0.00 0.00

2007 20070301 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.21 0.07 0.00

2007 20070305 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.10 0.05 0.00

2007 20070306 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.08 0.00 0.00

2007 20070307 NONRESIDENTIAL 9.38 3.92 0.00

2007 20070309 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.27 0.07 0.00

2007 20070311 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2007 20070312 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.19 0.49 0.00

2007 20070314 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2007 20070315 RESIDENTIAL 0.84 0.35 0.00

2007 20070318 RESIDENTIAL 1.77 0.99 0.00

2007 20070323 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.49 0.21 0.00

2007 20070325 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.14 0.07 0.00

2007 20070335 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2007 20070338 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.54 0.24 0.00

2007 20070345 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.21 0.07 0.00

2007 20070346 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.84 0.35 0.00

2007 20070353 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2007 20070355 RESIDENTIAL 2.43 1.17 0.07

2007 20070359 NONRESIDENTIAL 98.68 19.96 1.41

2007 20070360 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.56 0.21 0.00

2007 20070361 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.12 0.49 0.00

2007 20070362 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.05 0.42 0.00

2007 20070364 NONRESIDENTIAL 15.05 6.09 0.00

2007 20070370 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2007 20070372 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.63 0.28 0.00

2007 20070376 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.89 0.70 0.00

2007 20070377 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.08 0.38 0.00

2007 20070379 RESIDENTIAL 1.54 0.90 0.00

2007 20070390 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2007 20070394 NONRESIDENTIAL 4.90 2.03 0.00

2007 20070398 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.07 0.00 0.00

2007 20070399 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.61 0.70 0.00

2007 20070400 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.33 0.56 0.00

2007 20070401 NONRESIDENTIAL 2.00 0.80 0.00

2007 20070403 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.60 0.30 0.00

2007 20070406 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.14 0.07 0.00

2007 20070407 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.77 0.35 0.00

2007 20070409 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2007 20070413 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.77 0.28 0.00
Appendix B-2

Indirect Source Review On-Site Project List 4

Project 

Year Project ID Project Type

Onsite NOX

 Reduction 

(tons per 

year)

Onsite Dust 

 Reduction 

(tons per 

year)

Onsite Exhaust 

Reduction (tons 

per year)

2007 20070416 RESIDENTIAL 0.54 0.24 0.00

2007 20070417 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2007 20070420 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.98 0.42 0.00

2007 20070423 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.54 0.84 0.00

2007 20070424 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.48 0.16 0.00

2007 20070428 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.60 0.24 0.00

2007 20070430 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2007 20070431 RESIDENTIAL 1.01 0.14 0.14

2007 20070434 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.53 0.14 0.14

2007 20070435 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.70 0.29 0.00

2007 20070436 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2007 20070438 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.75 0.77 0.00

2007 20070439 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.19 0.49 0.00

2007 20070440 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.54 0.63 0.00

2007 20070441 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2007 20070443 RESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2007 20070446 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2007 20070447 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.26 0.54 0.00

2007 20070448 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.98 0.42 0.00

2007 20070454 MIXED USE 0.00 0.00 0.00

2007 20070455 RESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2007 20070457 NONRESIDENTIAL 7.12 3.02 0.08

2007 20070459 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2007 20070460 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.63 0.21 0.00

2007 20070461 NONRESIDENTIAL 63.84 5.34 0.02

2007 20070462 NONRESIDENTIAL 2.59 0.84 0.00

2007 20070463 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.10 0.38 0.00

2007 20070464 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2007 20070465 NONRESIDENTIAL 2.03 0.77 0.00

2007 20070468 RESIDENTIAL 0.63 0.28 0.00

2007 20070470 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.12 0.06 0.00

2007 20070471 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2007 20070472 RESIDENTIAL 0.30 0.14 0.00

2007 20070473 RESIDENTIAL 2.00 6.21 0.00

2007 20070474 RESIDENTIAL 1.80 0.97 0.00

2007 20070475 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.80 0.90 0.00

2007 20070476 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.07 0.00 0.00

2007 20070477 NONRESIDENTIAL 7.42 2.94 0.00

2007 20070478 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 0.00 0.00 0.00

2007 20070479 RESIDENTIAL 1.15 0.60 0.00

2007 20070480 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.05 0.49 0.00

2007 20070481 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.80 0.78 0.00

2007 20070482 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.93 0.45 0.09

2007 20070487 MIXED USE 0.14 0.07 0.00

2007 20070490 NONRESIDENTIAL 3.85 1.61 0.00

473.54 169.49 2.57

2008 20080001 RESIDENTIAL 1.62 0.84 0.00

2008 20080002 RESIDENTIAL 1.20 0.60 0.00

2008 20080003 RESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2008 20080004 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.42 0.42 0.00

2008 20080006 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2007 Subtotal (tons per year)
Appendix B-2

Indirect Source Review On-Site Project List 5

Project 

Year Project ID Project Type

Onsite NOX

 Reduction 

(tons per 

year)

Onsite Dust 

 Reduction 

(tons per 

year)

Onsite Exhaust 

Reduction (tons 

per year)

2008 20080007 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2008 20080010 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.90 0.36 0.00

2008 20080011 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2008 20080016 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2008 20080021 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.84 0.28 0.00

2008 20080024 NONRESIDENTIAL 2.46 0.66 0.00

2008 20080026 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.21 0.12 0.00

2008 20080027 MIXED USE 6.11 3.82 0.16

2008 20080028 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2008 20080029 RESIDENTIAL 0.44 0.06 0.01

2008 20080031 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 11.00 0.67 0.67

2008 20080033 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2008 20080034 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2008 20080038 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.36 0.00 0.00

2008 20080039 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2008 20080041 NONRESIDENTIAL 2.28 0.60 0.00

2008 20080043 RESIDENTIAL 2.46 3.81 0.12

2008 20080045 RESIDENTIAL 0.93 1.61 0.07

2008 20080046 RESIDENTIAL 9.41 3.54 0.24

2008 20080053 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.63 0.21 0.00

2008 20080055 RESIDENTIAL 0.28 1.63 0.00

2008 20080057 RESIDENTIAL 1.10 4.33 0.00

2008 20080059 NONRESIDENTIAL 10.02 4.62 0.00

2008 20080063 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2008 20080065 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.06 0.00 0.00

2008 20080067 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.78 0.24 0.00

2008 20080068 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.24 0.06 0.00

2008 20080070 NONRESIDENTIAL 7.84 3.08 0.00

2008 20080074 NONRESIDENTIAL 396.30 38.21 0.29

2008 20080078 RESIDENTIAL 0.72 0.96 0.00

2008 20080080 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.20 0.00 0.00

2008 20080082 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.90 0.60 0.00

2008 20080084 RESIDENTIAL 0.64 0.70 0.02

2008 20080087 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.12 0.11 0.00

2008 20080088 RESIDENTIAL 0.12 0.60 0.00

2008 20080091 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.07 0.00 0.00

2008 20080092 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2008 20080093 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.60 0.12 0.00

2008 20080095 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.54 0.18 0.00

2008 20080097 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.50 0.66 0.00

2008 20080098 NONRESIDENTIAL 2.18 0.60 0.00

2008 20080099 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.06 0.00 0.00

2008 20080100 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.21 0.07 0.00

2008 20080101 RESIDENTIAL 1.08 1.38 0.00

2008 20080102 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.70 0.21 0.00

2008 20080109 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2008 20080110 RESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2008 20080113 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.62 0.06 0.00

2008 20080114 RESIDENTIAL 3.30 2.34 0.00

2008 20080118 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.69 0.67 0.01

2008 20080119 NONRESIDENTIAL 3.40 1.35 0.00
Appendix B-2

Indirect Source Review On-Site Project List 6

Project 

Year Project ID Project Type

Onsite NOX

 Reduction 

(tons per 

year)

Onsite Dust 

 Reduction 

(tons per 

year)

Onsite Exhaust 

Reduction (tons 

per year)

2008 20080120 NONRESIDENTIAL 3.85 1.95 0.00

2008 20080121 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.05 0.38 0.00

2008 20080124 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.78 0.48 0.00

2008 20080126 NONRESIDENTIAL 2.22 0.84 0.00

2008 20080127 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2008 20080128 NONRESIDENTIAL 2.22 0.78 0.00

2008 20080129 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.56 0.35 0.00

2008 20080136 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2008 20080137 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.83 0.23 0.00

2008 20080141 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.15 0.35 0.00

2008 20080142 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2008 20080144 RESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2008 20080145 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2008 20080146 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 0.00 0.00 0.00

2008 20080147 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.50 0.48 0.00

2008 20080148 RESIDENTIAL 1.20 0.48 0.00

2008 20080149 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.54 0.18 0.00

2008 20080150 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.56 0.21 0.00

2008 20080153 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.02 0.13 0.06

2008 20080154 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.62 0.42 0.00

2008 20080156 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.26 0.42 0.00

2008 20080157 RESIDENTIAL 1.35 2.35 0.00

2008 20080158 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2008 20080166 RESIDENTIAL 2.06 1.43 0.03

2008 20080167 RESIDENTIAL 0.66 2.36 0.00

2008 20080168 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.15 0.05 0.00

2008 20080170 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.12 0.06 0.00

2008 20080172 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.66 0.12 0.00

2008 20080174 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.60 0.24 0.00

2008 20080178 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.19 0.07 0.00

2008 20080184 RESIDENTIAL 1.40 2.03 0.00

2008 20080185 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.42 0.18 0.00

2008 20080187 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.01 0.28 0.02

2008 20080188 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.84 0.48 0.00

2008 20080189 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.93 0.24 0.04

2008 20080190 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2008 20080192 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.60 0.21 0.00

2008 20080193 RESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2008 20080194 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.48 0.24 0.00

2008 20080195 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.21 0.07 0.00

2008 20080197 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.35 0.24 0.06

2008 20080199 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.06 0.00 0.00

2008 20080201 MIXED USE 3.33 4.98 0.62

2008 20080202 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.45 0.15 0.00

2008 20080205 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.42 0.00 0.00

2008 20080207 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.40 0.49 0.00

2008 20080210 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.69 0.42 0.00

2008 20080211 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2008 20080212 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.56 0.35 0.00

2008 20080215 NONRESIDENTIAL 7.07 3.29 0.10

2008 20080216 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.94 0.32 0.00
Appendix B-2

Indirect Source Review On-Site Project List 7

Project 

Year Project ID Project Type

Onsite NOX

 Reduction 

(tons per 

year)

Onsite Dust 

 Reduction 

(tons per 

year)

Onsite Exhaust 

Reduction (tons 

per year)

2008 20080218 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.65 0.20 0.00

2008 20080221 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.50 0.48 0.00

2008 20080224 RESIDENTIAL 0.70 1.15 0.00

2008 20080225 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2008 20080226 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2008 20080227 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2008 20080229 RESIDENTIAL 1.74 1.62 0.00

2008 20080230 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.12 0.00 0.00

2008 20080231 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.69 0.09 0.09

2008 20080232 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.50 0.48 0.00

2008 20080233 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.42 0.12 0.00

2008 20080235 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2008 20080236 MIXED USE 11.48 4.05 0.00

2008 20080237 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2008 20080238 NONRESIDENTIAL 2.15 0.85 0.00

2008 20080241 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2008 20080242 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

546.80 117.75 2.61

2009 20090001 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.60 0.30 0.00

2009 20090002 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.80 0.35 0.00

2009 20090011 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2009 20090012 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.38 0.48 0.00

2009 20090014 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.36 0.16 0.00

2009 20090015 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.05 0.02 0.00

2009 20090017 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.72 0.24 0.00

2009 20090018 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.42 0.05 0.05

2009 20090019 NONRESIDENTIAL 6.53 0.69 0.28

2009 20090021 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.24 0.12 0.00

2009 20090025 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.50 0.35 0.00

2009 20090026 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.16 0.48 0.00

2009 20090029 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.94 0.24 0.24

2009 20090030 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.90 0.24 0.00

2009 20090034 NONRESIDENTIAL 6.74 0.41 0.41

2009 20090035 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2009 20090036 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.11 0.06 0.00

2009 20090046 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.28 0.20 0.00

2009 20090048 RESIDENTIAL 0.59 0.09 0.09

2009 20090049 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.04 0.00 0.00

2009 20090050 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.35 0.15 0.00

2009 20090052 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.30 0.05 0.00

2009 20090053 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2009 20090054 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.33 0.14 0.00

2009 20090056 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.12 0.06 0.00

2009 20090057 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.36 0.12 0.00

2009 20090058 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.23 0.66 0.00

2009 20090062 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.18 0.06 0.00

2009 20090064 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.30 0.12 0.00

2009 20090065 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2009 20090066 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.48 0.18 0.00

2009 20090067 RESIDENTIAL 0.60 0.80 0.00

2009 20090071 RESIDENTIAL 0.16 1.16 0.00

2008 Subtotal (tons per year)
Appendix B-2

Indirect Source Review On-Site Project List 8

Project 

Year Project ID Project Type

Onsite NOX

 Reduction 

(tons per 

year)

Onsite Dust 

 Reduction 

(tons per 

year)

Onsite Exhaust 

Reduction (tons 

per year)

2009 20090076 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 0.00 0.00 0.00

2009 20090079 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2009 20090080 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 1.32 0.14 0.14

2009 20090082 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.12 0.06 0.00

2009 20090085 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.42 0.18 0.00

2009 20090086 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.18 0.06 0.00

2009 20090088 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 1.00 0.14 0.14

2009 20090089 NONRESIDENTIAL 14.22 2.04 0.00

2009 20090091 RESIDENTIAL 0.32 0.60 0.00

2009 20090092 NONRESIDENTIAL 2.96 1.36 0.00

2009 20090093 NONRESIDENTIAL 4.28 0.32 0.32

2009 20090094 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.24 0.06 0.00

2009 20090095 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2009 20090097 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.28 0.03 0.03

2009 20090099 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.37 0.15 0.00

2009 20090101 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 0.00 0.00 0.00

2009 20090102 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.06 0.00 0.00

2009 20090104 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.28 0.09 0.00

2009 20090105 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.25 0.05 0.00

2009 20090106 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.35 0.15 0.00

2009 20090107 RESIDENTIAL 3.36 2.38 0.00

2009 20090108 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.60 0.20 0.00

2009 20090109 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.15 0.05 0.00

2009 20090110 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.15 0.05 0.00

2009 20090114 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2009 20090115 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.36 0.06 0.00

2009 20090116 RESIDENTIAL 0.45 0.27 0.00

2009 20090117 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2009 20090119 RESIDENTIAL 0.04 0.12 0.00

2009 20090123 RESIDENTIAL 0.91 0.79 0.07

2009 20090127 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2009 20090129 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.15 0.05 0.00

2009 20090130 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.43 0.17 0.02

2009 20090132 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.10 0.05 0.00

2009 20090133 RESIDENTIAL 0.85 0.60 0.00

2009 20090134 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.20 0.10 0.00

2009 20090137 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 0.75 0.06 0.06

2009 20090140 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.15 0.10 0.00

2009 20090141 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.25 0.05 0.00

2009 20090142 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.40 0.12 0.00

2009 20090148 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.12 0.04 0.00

2009 20090149 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2009 20090150 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.04 0.55 0.00

2009 20090151 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.25 0.05 0.00

2009 20090154 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.05 0.05 0.00

2009 20090160 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.77 0.23 0.03

2009 20090161 NONRESIDENTIAL 20.52 1.93 1.93

2009 20090162 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.35 0.15 0.00

2009 20090163 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2009 20090164 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.84 0.30 0.05

2009 20090166 RESIDENTIAL 0.86 0.81 0.05
Appendix B-2

Indirect Source Review On-Site Project List 9

Project 

Year Project ID Project Type

Onsite NOX

 Reduction 

(tons per 

year)

Onsite Dust 

 Reduction 

(tons per 

year)

Onsite Exhaust 

Reduction (tons 

per year)

2009 20090167 RESIDENTIAL 1.09 1.33 0.08

2009 20090168 RESIDENTIAL 1.65 1.73 0.09

2009 20090169 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2009 20090171 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2009 20090173 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 6.74 0.72 0.72

2009 20090174 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 7.04 0.77 0.77

2009 20090179 RESIDENTIAL 0.52 0.64 0.00

2009 20090180 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.14 0.05 0.00

2009 20090181 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 2.72 0.41 0.41

2009 20090182 MIXED USE 0.00 0.00 0.00

2009 20090184 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.50 0.15 0.00

2009 20090187 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2009 20090191 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.05 0.05 0.00

2009 20090193 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.55 0.15 0.00

2009 20090194 MIXED USE 0.44 0.28 0.00

2009 20090199 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.92 0.14 0.14

110.88 29.16 6.12

2010 20100005 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.32 0.20 0.00

2010 20100006 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.10 0.00 0.00

2010 20100007 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.50 0.05 0.05

2010 20100009 NONRESIDENTIAL 26.45 2.40 0.00

2010 20100021 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.39 0.11 0.04

2010 20100022 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.25 0.50 0.00

2010 20100026 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.36 0.12 0.00

2010 20100027 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.42 0.05 0.05

2010 20100028 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.17 0.02 0.02

2010 20100031 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.16 0.08 0.02

2010 20100032 RESIDENTIAL 0.72 1.44 0.00

2010 20100035 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2010 20100039 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.98 0.20 0.20

2010 20100040 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 2.20 0.27 0.27

2010 20100045 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.42 0.21 0.09

2010 20100046 RESIDENTIAL 2.88 6.18 0.15

2010 20100047 NONRESIDENTIAL 2.67 3.40 0.19

2010 20100050 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2010 20100053 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.70 0.15 0.00

2010 20100054 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2010 20100055 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2010 20100058 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.28 0.16 0.16

2010 20100062 RESIDENTIAL 1.77 2.78 0.00

2010 20100065 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.88 0.64 0.00

2010 20100066 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.12 0.04 0.00

2010 20100068 NONRESIDENTIAL 3.14 1.91 0.31

2010 20100069 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.97 1.75 0.21

2010 20100071 RESIDENTIAL 1.46 5.00 0.00

2010 20100073 RESIDENTIAL 0.25 0.67 0.00

2010 20100074 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.35 0.15 0.00

2010 20100076 RESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2010 20100081 RESIDENTIAL 4.24 6.42 0.00

2010 20100085 RESIDENTIAL 0.45 0.81 0.00

2010 20100086 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.10 0.05 0.00

2009 Subtotal (tons per year)
Appendix B-2

Indirect Source Review On-Site Project List 10

Project 

Year Project ID Project Type

Onsite NOX

 Reduction 

(tons per 

year)

Onsite Dust 

 Reduction 

(tons per 

year)

Onsite Exhaust 

Reduction (tons 

per year)

2010 20100088 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.77 0.24 0.24

2010 20100089 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.16 0.04 0.00

2010 20100099 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 1.79 0.68 0.68

2010 20100101 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.80 0.30 0.00

2010 20100104 RESIDENTIAL 0.72 0.84 0.00

2010 20100107 RESIDENTIAL 0.28 0.20 0.00

2010 20100108 RESIDENTIAL 0.76 0.72 0.00

2010 20100110 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.04 0.00 0.00

2010 20100111 RESIDENTIAL 0.99 1.14 0.00

2010 20100113 RESIDENTIAL 1.54 1.26 0.14

2010 20100116 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.22 0.03 0.03

2010 20100117 RESIDENTIAL 1.27 2.15 0.08

2010 20100118 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.83 0.14 0.11

2010 20100119 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2010 20100120 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2010 20100121 RESIDENTIAL 0.34 0.32 0.04

2010 20100122 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.40 0.20 0.00

2010 20100126 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.41 0.08 0.04

2010 20100127 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.29 0.04 0.04

2010 20100131 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2010 20100133 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.25 0.05 0.05

2010 20100134 NONRESIDENTIAL 2.78 0.47 0.47

2010 20100136 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.20 0.08 0.00

2010 20100137 RESIDENTIAL 0.57 1.71 0.00

2010 20100138 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.90 0.10 0.10

2010 20100139 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.08 0.00 0.00

2010 20100140 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 4.63 0.46 0.46

2010 20100142 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.25 0.35 0.00

2010 20100143 NONRESIDENTIAL 2.69 0.90 0.02

2010 20100144 NONRESIDENTIAL 14.41 5.27 0.00

2010 20100145 NONRESIDENTIAL 8.78 1.70 0.00

2010 20100146 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.05 0.00 0.00

2010 20100147 NONRESIDENTIAL 2.40 0.84 0.00

2010 20100149 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.70 0.25 0.05

2010 20100150 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.37 0.19 0.00

2010 20100151 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 2.48 0.27 0.27

2010 20100152 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.43 0.03 0.03

2010 20100156 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.70 0.15 0.07

2010 20100158 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.20 0.08 0.00

2010 20100159 RESIDENTIAL 0.35 0.15 0.00

2010 20100160 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.12 0.06 0.00

2010 20100161 NONRESIDENTIAL 3.27 1.30 0.00

2010 20100162 NONRESIDENTIAL 8.11 3.06 0.00

2010 20100163 NONRESIDENTIAL 3.47 0.32 0.32

2010 20100166 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.73 5.55 0.07

2010 20100167 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.12 0.14 0.14

2010 20100168 RESIDENTIAL 0.87 0.34 0.13

2010 20100170 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.16 0.04 0.00

2010 20100172 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.22 0.12 0.00

2010 20100174 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.12 0.00 0.00

2010 20100176 NONRESIDENTIAL 6.98 0.85 0.70
Appendix B-2

Indirect Source Review On-Site Project List 11

Project 

Year Project ID Project Type

Onsite NOX

 Reduction 

(tons per 

year)

Onsite Dust 

 Reduction 

(tons per 

year)

Onsite Exhaust 

Reduction (tons 

per year)

2010 20100177 NONRESIDENTIAL 2.79 0.34 0.28

2010 20100178 NONRESIDENTIAL 2.81 0.37 0.28

2010 20100179 NONRESIDENTIAL 2.81 0.37 0.28

2010 20100181 NONRESIDENTIAL 2.82 0.34 0.28

2010 20100182 NONRESIDENTIAL 2.78 0.28 0.28

2010 20100183 NONRESIDENTIAL 2.79 0.34 0.28

2010 20100184 NONRESIDENTIAL 2.79 0.34 0.28

2010 20100185 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.02 0.04 0.00

2010 20100186 RESIDENTIAL 0.58 0.28 0.05

2010 20100189 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.49 0.07 0.07

2010 20100191 MIXED USE 0.29 0.49 0.00

2010 20100192 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.28 0.05 0.01

2010 20100202 NONRESIDENTIAL 3.35 0.45 0.07

2010 20100204 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2010 20100205 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.38 0.04 0.04

2010 20100206 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 1.06 0.23 0.23

2010 20100208 RESIDENTIAL 1.71 2.62 0.14

2010 20100209 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.15 0.06 0.00

167.60 75.68 8.61

2011 20110001 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 4.44 0.41 0.41

2011 20110003 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 2.20 0.32 0.32

2011 20110004 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2011 20110008 MIXED USE 1.76 4.80 0.00

2011 20110009 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.89 0.54 0.00

2011 20110010 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 8.56 1.26 1.26

2011 20110011 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.17 0.07 0.00

2011 20110015 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.41 0.13 0.01

2011 20110016 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 1.60 0.18 0.18

2011 20110017 NONRESIDENTIAL 11.23 1.38 1.01

2011 20110021 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.06 0.03 0.00

2011 20110022 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.57 0.24 0.00

2011 20110023 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.35 0.36 0.08

2011 20110029 MIXED USE 0.92 0.36 0.00

2011 20110030 NONRESIDENTIAL 553.54 29.25 0.05

2011 20110036 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 3.46 0.45 0.45

2011 20110037 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.18 0.09 0.00

2011 20110038 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 7.60 0.81 0.81

2011 20110040 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2011 20110041 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.13 0.02 0.02

2011 20110043 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.29 0.17 0.00

2011 20110044 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.06 0.04 0.00

2011 20110045 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2011 20110046 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.08 0.00 0.00

2011 20110047 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2011 20110050 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2011 20110051 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.19 0.03 0.03

2011 20110053 NONRESIDENTIAL 6.90 0.99 0.73

2011 20110054 RESIDENTIAL 2.28 1.97 0.11

2011 20110056 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 2.73 0.66 0.27

2011 20110058 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.04 0.00 0.00

2011 20110059 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 3.02 0.32 0.32

2010 Subtotal (tons per year)
Appendix B-2

Indirect Source Review On-Site Project List 12

Project 

Year Project ID Project Type

Onsite NOX

 Reduction 

(tons per 

year)

Onsite Dust 

 Reduction 

(tons per 

year)

Onsite Exhaust 

Reduction (tons 

per year)

2011 20110061 RESIDENTIAL 1.42 1.90 0.16

2011 20110062 NONRESIDENTIAL 2.85 1.69 0.32

2011 20110064 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.15 0.09 0.00

2011 20110067 RESIDENTIAL 0.60 1.35 0.00

2011 20110075 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2011 20110077 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 5.45 0.00

2011 20110080 NONRESIDENTIAL 2.85 1.69 0.32

2011 20110082 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 0.00 0.00 0.00

2011 20110083 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2011 20110084 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 0.84 0.11 0.11

2011 20110085 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.04 0.40 0.00

2011 20110086 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 0.54 0.05 0.05

2011 20110089 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 0.50 0.05 0.05

2011 20110090 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.44 0.08 0.00

2011 20110091 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.48 0.18 0.00

2011 20110093 NONRESIDENTIAL 2.08 0.86 0.20

2011 20110094 NONRESIDENTIAL 2.27 1.66 0.99

2011 20110096 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.20 0.33 0.03

2011 20110099 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.02 0.06 0.00

2011 20110103 MIXED USE 0.15 0.21 0.00

2011 20110105 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.48 0.21 0.00

2011 20110106 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2011 20110107 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.36 0.20 0.00

2011 20110109 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 3.88 0.40 0.40

2011 20110110 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.20 0.03 0.03

2011 20110111 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.06 0.03 0.00

2011 20110113 RESIDENTIAL 0.21 0.66 0.00

2011 20110114 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 2.30 0.23 0.23

2011 20110115 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.09 0.06 0.00

2011 20110116 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.09 0.06 0.00

2011 20110117 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.18 0.09 0.00

2011 20110118 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2011 20110119 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.45 0.24 0.00

2011 20110121 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.57 4.35 0.17

2011 20110122 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.81 0.57 0.20

2011 20110123 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.68 0.79 0.26

2011 20110124 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.80 0.56 0.20

2011 20110125 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.09 0.03 0.00

2011 20110126 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 0.00 0.00 0.00

2011 20110129 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.30 0.15 0.00

2011 20110130 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.12 0.06 0.00

2011 20110135 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.24 0.12 0.00

2011 20110136 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.24 0.09 0.00

2011 20110137 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2011 20110138 RESIDENTIAL 0.77 0.51 0.09

2011 20110139 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 9.88 1.08 1.08

2011 20110146 NONRESIDENTIAL 7.73 4.17 0.03

2011 20110147 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 6.52 0.95 0.95

2011 20110148 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.03 0.00 0.00

2011 20110149 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.18 0.06 0.00

2011 20110150 MIXED USE 0.32 0.50 0.00
Appendix B-2

Indirect Source Review On-Site Project List 13

Project 

Year Project ID Project Type

Onsite NOX

 Reduction 

(tons per 

year)

Onsite Dust 

 Reduction 

(tons per 

year)

Onsite Exhaust 

Reduction (tons 

per year)

2011 20110151 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.06 0.03 0.00

2011 20110152 RESIDENTIAL 0.56 2.57 0.00

2011 20110157 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.41 0.14 0.03

2011 20110158 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.18 0.06 0.00

2011 20110159 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.06 0.06 0.00

2011 20110162 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.10 0.04 0.00

2011 20110163 NONRESIDENTIAL 9.70 1.03 1.03

2011 20110164 NONRESIDENTIAL 2.99 0.91 0.28

2011 20110165 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.73 0.74 0.07

2011 20110166 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.06 0.00

2011 20110167 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.45 0.12 0.05

2011 20110178 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.75 0.15 0.07

2011 20110179 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.65 0.44 0.09

2011 20110181 MIXED USE 0.42 0.42 0.00

2011 20110182 NONRESIDENTIAL 2.33 2.14 0.25

2011 20110183 NONRESIDENTIAL 2.34 0.34 0.22

2011 20110184 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.40 0.20 0.00

2011 20110185 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.10 0.25 0.12

2011 20110186 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2011 20110188 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.20 0.14 0.00

2011 20110189 NONRESIDENTIAL 4.29 1.18 0.41

2011 20110190 NONRESIDENTIAL 14.81 1.00 0.62

2011 20110192 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.20 0.16 0.00

2011 20110193 RESIDENTIAL 0.68 0.84 0.06

2011 20110194 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.95 0.20 0.10

2011 20110195 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.64 0.87 0.15

2011 20110196 NONRESIDENTIAL 2.86 0.78 0.30

2011 20110197 NONRESIDENTIAL 2.70 0.71 0.29

2011 20110198 NONRESIDENTIAL 3.85 1.13 0.41

2011 20110200 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2011 20110201 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.31 0.00

2011 20110208 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.03 0.00 0.00

2011 20110213 NONRESIDENTIAL 2.09 1.32 0.20

2011 20110214 RESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2011 20110215 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.24 0.33 0.12

2011 20110216 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 0.58 0.09 0.09

2011 20110217 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.26 0.77 0.07

2011 20110220 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2011 20110221 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.92 1.30 0.18

2011 20110222 NONRESIDENTIAL 2.83 1.83 0.27

2011 20110223 NONRESIDENTIAL 2.27 0.30 0.24

2011 20110225 RESIDENTIAL 0.58 0.55 0.07

2011 20110226 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.06 0.02 0.00

2011 20110229 RESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2011 20110230 RESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2011 20110231 RESIDENTIAL 0.39 0.57 0.00

2011 20110232 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.03 0.03 0.00

2011 20110233 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.03 0.03 0.00

2011 20110234 RESIDENTIAL 0.16 0.12 0.00
Appendix B-2

Indirect Source Review On-Site Project List 14

Project 

Year Project ID Project Type

Onsite NOX

 Reduction 

(tons per 

year)

Onsite Dust 

 Reduction 

(tons per 

year)

Onsite Exhaust 

Reduction (tons 

per year)

2011 20110235 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.53 1.08 0.05

2011 20110237 NONRESIDENTIAL 2.28 0.31 0.22

2011 20110239 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 10.46 1.04 1.04

757.82 103.95 19.03

2012 20120001 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2012 20120002 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.06 0.03 0.00

2012 20120003 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.24 0.15 0.00

2012 20120004 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.03 0.00 0.00

2012 20120005 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.06 0.03 0.00

2012 20120006 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.03 0.00 0.00

2012 20120007 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.18 0.09 0.00

2012 20120008 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.26 0.13 0.13

2012 20120009 RESIDENTIAL 0.69 0.32 0.07

2012 20120010 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 1.80 0.18 0.18

2012 20120012 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 1.34 0.18 0.18

2012 20120014 RESIDENTIAL 0.41 0.24 0.04

2012 20120015 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2012 20120016 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.20 0.35 0.11

2012 20120017 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2012 20120018 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2012 20120022 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2012 20120023 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.09 0.03 0.00

2012 20120024 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.81 0.30 0.00

2012 20120025 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2012 20120026 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.14 0.91 0.00

2012 20120027 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.03 0.00 0.00

2012 20120028 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 1.02 0.09 0.09

2012 20120029 NONRESIDENTIAL 2.09 1.24 0.00

2012 20120031 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 2.36 0.32 0.32

2012 20120034 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.54 0.22 0.00

2012 20120035 RESIDENTIAL 0.58 0.98 0.00

2012 20120036 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.51 0.09 0.03

2012 20120037 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.31 0.08 0.02

2012 20120038 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.11 0.00

2012 20120039 MIXED USE 0.07 0.09 0.00

2012 20120041 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.31 0.09 0.03

2012 20120042 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2012 20120043 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.54 0.23 0.03

2012 20120044 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.21 0.06 0.00

2012 20120046 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.14 0.11 0.10

2012 20120047 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2012 20120048 NONRESIDENTIAL 2.39 2.72 0.21

2012 20120050 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.09 0.06 0.00

2012 20120051 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.21 0.12 0.00

2012 20120052 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.15 0.06 0.00

2012 20120053 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2012 20120054 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.73 0.21 0.05

2012 20120055 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.48 0.18 0.00

2012 20120056 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.33 0.18 0.00

2012 20120057 RESIDENTIAL 0.13 0.08 0.00

2012 20120060 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.44 0.18 0.02

2011 Subtotal (tons per year)
Appendix B-2

Indirect Source Review On-Site Project List 15

Project 

Year Project ID Project Type

Onsite NOX

 Reduction 

(tons per 

year)

Onsite Dust 

 Reduction 

(tons per 

year)

Onsite Exhaust 

Reduction (tons 

per year)

2012 20120066 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.27 0.12 0.00

2012 20120067 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.02 0.00

2012 20120068 NONRESIDENTIAL 3.48 0.30 0.30

2012 20120069 NONRESIDENTIAL 7.34 1.77 0.70

2012 20120070 NONRESIDENTIAL 7.34 0.75 0.70

2012 20120073 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.30 0.00 0.00

2012 20120074 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 113.58 9.68 9.68

2012 20120075 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.38 0.06 0.04

2012 20120077 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.18 0.08 0.00

2012 20120078 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.08 0.02 0.00

2012 20120079 MIXED USE 0.41 0.25 0.00

2012 20120080 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 5.90 0.72 0.72

2012 20120081 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.18 0.50 0.06

2012 20120082 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.03 0.03 0.00

2012 20120083 NONRESIDENTIAL 9.35 1.25 0.05

2012 20120084 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.04 0.02 0.00

2012 20120085 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 1.98 0.32 0.32

2012 20120087 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.02 0.51 0.09

2012 20120088 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2012 20120089 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2012 20120092 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2012 20120093 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.03 0.01 0.00

2012 20120095 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 0.00 0.00 0.00

2012 20120098 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.57 0.98 0.14

2012 20120099 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.16 0.08 0.00

2012 20120102 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.55 0.08 0.08

2012 20120103 NONRESIDENTIAL 6.35 1.08 0.57

2012 20120104 RESIDENTIAL 0.96 0.62 0.15

2012 20120106 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.05 0.09 0.09

2012 20120107 NONRESIDENTIAL 2.55 0.23 0.23

2012 20120108 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.28 0.08 0.00

2012 20120111 NONRESIDENTIAL 6.18 0.43 0.31

2012 20120112 NONRESIDENTIAL 6.18 0.43 0.31

2012 20120113 MIXED USE 0.04 0.04 0.00

2012 20120114 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.07 0.03 0.00

2012 20120115 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.07 0.03 0.00

2012 20120116 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.11 0.05 0.00

2012 20120117 RESIDENTIAL 0.87 0.98 0.08

2012 20120118 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.03 0.00 0.00

2012 20120119 MIXED USE 0.03 0.03 0.00

2012 20120121 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 7.96 0.30 0.30

2012 20120122 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.30 0.14 0.00

2012 20120123 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.68 0.26 0.00

2012 20120124 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.32 0.20 0.00

2012 20120126 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2012 20120127 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2012 20120128 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.68 0.52 0.08

2012 20120131 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00
Appendix B-2

Indirect Source Review On-Site Project List 16

Project 

Year Project ID Project Type

Onsite NOX

 Reduction 

(tons per 

year)

Onsite Dust 

 Reduction 

(tons per 

year)

Onsite Exhaust 

Reduction (tons 

per year)

2012 20120132 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.30 0.12 0.00

2012 20120136 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.19 0.37 0.03

2012 20120137 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.01 0.33 0.03

2012 20120138 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 0.32 0.05 0.05

2012 20120140 RESIDENTIAL 0.18 0.54 0.00

2012 20120159 NONRESIDENTIAL 6.44 1.96 0.58

2012 20120161 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2012 20120162 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.82 0.49 0.00

2012 20120164 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.41 0.14 0.05

2012 20120166 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.90 0.68 0.00

2012 20120168 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 0.00 0.00 0.00

2012 20120169 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.40 0.11 0.04

2012 20120173 RESIDENTIAL 2.37 1.25 0.31

2012 20120174 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2012 20120175 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.09 0.25 0.23

2012 20120178 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.36 0.36 0.16

2012 20120179 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.40 0.10 0.03

2012 20120180 NONRESIDENTIAL 2.14 4.20 0.19

2012 20120181 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.19 0.32 0.12

2012 20120183 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.36 0.14 0.00

2012 20120184 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2012 20120185 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 0.00 0.00 0.00

2012 20120186 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 1.24 0.09 0.09

2012 20120188 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.40 0.16 0.00

2012 20120189 NONRESIDENTIAL 3.81 0.76 0.34

2012 20120190 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.85 1.74 0.17

2012 20120192 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.50 0.07 0.07

2012 20120193 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.48 0.34 0.00

2012 20120194 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2012 20120195 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.05 0.00

2012 20120196 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2012 20120197 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.19 0.76 0.10

2012 20120200 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.41 0.11 0.11

2012 20120202 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 62.84 4.73 4.73

2012 20120205 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2012 20120206 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2012 20120208 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 4.07 0.00

2012 20120209 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.01 0.12 0.12

2012 20120210 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.50 0.06 0.06

2012 20120211 RESIDENTIAL 1.00 0.47 0.13

2012 20120212 RESIDENTIAL 1.84 0.53 0.27

2012 20120213 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.53 0.08 0.08

2012 20120214 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2012 20120215 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.56 0.28 0.00

2012 20120216 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.68 0.44 0.00

2012 20120219 RESIDENTIAL 1.12 0.36 0.14

2012 20120220 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.94 0.30 0.00

2012 20120221 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.04 0.04 0.00
Appendix B-2

Indirect Source Review On-Site Project List 17

Project 

Year Project ID Project Type

Onsite NOX

 Reduction 

(tons per 

year)

Onsite Dust 

 Reduction 

(tons per 

year)

Onsite Exhaust 

Reduction (tons 

per year)

2012 20120222 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 3.04 0.41 0.41

2012 20120224 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 14.56 1.13 1.13

2012 20120225 RESIDENTIAL 0.27 0.27 0.00

2012 20120227 NONRESIDENTIAL 3.42 0.79 0.00

2012 20120229 MIXED USE 0.22 0.10 0.00

2012 20120230 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.91 0.14 0.14

2012 20120231 RESIDENTIAL 0.94 0.32 0.11

2012 20120234 MIXED USE 0.01 0.02 0.00

2012 20120235 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.72 0.34 0.00

2012 20120239 NONRESIDENTIAL 9.17 1.01 0.00

2012 20120240 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.09 0.00

2012 20120241 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.09 0.00

2012 20120242 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.09 0.00

2012 20120243 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.09 0.00

2012 20120244 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 0.40 0.05 0.05

2012 20120245 RESIDENTIAL 1.61 0.46 0.23

2012 20120246 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2012 20120248 MIXED USE 0.57 0.35 0.05

2012 20120249 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.08 0.00

2012 20120250 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.19 0.13 0.13

2012 20120255 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.44 0.02 0.02

355.17 66.48 27.11

2013 20130005 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 8.52 0.90 0.90

2013 20130006 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2013 20130008 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2013 20130009 RESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2013 20130010 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.98 0.26 0.26

2013 20130012 RESIDENTIAL 0.43 0.15 0.05

2013 20130014 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2013 20130016 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.20 0.08 0.00

2013 20130017 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2013 20130018 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.40 0.13 0.04

2013 20130019 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.10 0.00

2013 20130020 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 2.95 0.36 0.36

2013 20130021 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.58 0.22 0.20

2013 20130022 RESIDENTIAL 1.23 0.39 0.05

2013 20130024 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 3.48 0.22 0.22

2013 20130025 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.42 0.16 0.00

2013 20130027 NONRESIDENTIAL 2.76 0.27 0.27

2013 20130028 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.21 0.17 0.17

2013 20130029 RESIDENTIAL 0.27 1.86 0.00

2013 20130030 RESIDENTIAL 0.12 0.50 0.00

2013 20130031 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2013 20130033 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 1.28 0.18 0.18

2013 20130034 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.44 0.18 0.00

2013 20130035 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.01 0.00 0.00

2013 20130036 RESIDENTIAL 1.56 0.72 0.20

2013 20130039 MIXED USE 1.20 0.41 0.11

2012 Subtotal (tons per year)
Appendix B-2

Indirect Source Review On-Site Project List 18

Project 

Year Project ID Project Type

Onsite NOX

 Reduction 

(tons per 

year)

Onsite Dust 

 Reduction 

(tons per 

year)

Onsite Exhaust 

Reduction (tons 

per year)

2013 20130042 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2013 20130043 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.29 0.03 0.03

2013 20130044 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.19 0.02 0.02

2013 20130046 MIXED USE 0.84 0.54 0.00

2013 20130048 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.05 0.02 0.00

2013 20130049 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.48 0.60 0.00

2013 20130050 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 1.08 0.14 0.14

2013 20130056 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 11.96 0.95 0.95

2013 20130058 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2013 20130059 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2013 20130060 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 2.17 0.25 0.25

2013 20130061 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2013 20130063 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 0.00 0.00 0.00

2013 20130064 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 0.54 0.05 0.05

2013 20130065 RESIDENTIAL 1.14 0.22 0.10

2013 20130066 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.08 0.05 0.00

2013 20130067 RESIDENTIAL 1.04 0.40 0.10

2013 20130068 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 0.83 0.12 0.12

2013 20130072 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.93 0.95 0.00

2013 20130075 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.59 0.11 0.07

2013 20130076 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.06 0.03 0.00

2013 20130077 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.14 0.14 0.00

2013 20130078 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 2.22 0.27 0.27

2013 20130080 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.04 0.40 0.00

2013 20130082 RESIDENTIAL 3.40 1.77 0.42

2013 20130083 RESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2013 20130085 RESIDENTIAL 4.06 1.20 0.18

2013 20130086 RESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2013 20130087 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.17 0.07 0.00

2013 20130093 RESIDENTIAL 1.05 0.15 0.14

2013 20130094 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.22 0.18 0.00

2013 20130098 RESIDENTIAL 1.58 0.48 0.19

2013 20130102 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2013 20130103 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 9.70 1.50 1.50

2013 20130104 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 0.00 0.00 0.00

2013 20130107 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.10 0.22 0.09

2013 20130108 NONRESIDENTIAL 4.56 0.54 0.54

2013 20130111 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.86 0.38 0.00

2013 20130113 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2013 20130114 RESIDENTIAL 0.74 0.32 0.07

2013 20130115 RESIDENTIAL 0.59 0.54 0.00

2013 20130116 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.99 0.26 0.09

2013 20130117 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.52 0.12 0.00

2013 20130118 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.36 0.14 0.00

2013 20130119 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.94 0.20 0.00

2013 20130120 RESIDENTIAL 0.09 0.01 0.01

2013 20130122 RESIDENTIAL 1.35 0.69 0.14

2013 20130123 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.13 0.13 0.00
Appendix B-2

Indirect Source Review On-Site Project List 19

Project 

Year Project ID Project Type

Onsite NOX

 Reduction 

(tons per 

year)

Onsite Dust 

 Reduction 

(tons per 

year)

Onsite Exhaust 

Reduction (tons 

per year)

2013 20130124 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 2.04 0.18 0.18

2013 20130125 RESIDENTIAL 0.08 0.19 0.00

2013 20130126 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.30 0.12 0.00

2013 20130128 RESIDENTIAL 1.14 0.22 0.14

2013 20130129 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2013 20130130 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2013 20130131 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.12 0.06 0.00

2013 20130132 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.22 0.05 0.00

2013 20130133 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.30 0.06 0.00

2013 20130134 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2013 20130135 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2013 20130137 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.04 0.00

2013 20130138 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.02 0.00

2013 20130139 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.10 0.18 0.00

2013 20130141 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.02 0.00 0.00

2013 20130143 RESIDENTIAL 0.23 0.21 0.00

2013 20130144 RESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2013 20130146 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.12 0.12 0.00

2013 20130147 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.32 0.12 0.00

2013 20130149 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 0.90 0.09 0.09

2013 20130150 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.31 0.05 0.05

2013 20130154 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.90 0.13 0.13

2013 20130155 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.23 0.58 0.00

2013 20130158 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 0.00 0.00 0.00

2013 20130159 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 0.00 0.00 0.00

2013 20130161 RESIDENTIAL 0.63 0.27 0.08

2013 20130164 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2013 20130165 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.07 0.06 0.00

2013 20130167 RESIDENTIAL 0.23 0.19 0.00

2013 20130170 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 1.66 0.18 0.18

2013 20130174 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.26 0.11 0.00

2013 20130175 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2013 20130177 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2013 20130178 RESIDENTIAL 1.18 0.31 0.14

2013 20130181 RESIDENTIAL 0.45 0.08 0.06

2013 20130184 RESIDENTIAL 0.88 0.22 0.11

2013 20130185 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 11.64 1.52 1.52

2013 20130187 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 0.00 0.00 0.00

2013 20130189 RESIDENTIAL 0.54 0.22 0.07

2013 20130193 RESIDENTIAL 0.65 0.11 0.10

2013 20130194 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.96 0.17 0.13

2013 20130195 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.01 0.00 0.00

2013 20130200 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2013 20130201 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.02 0.01 0.00

2013 20130202 RESIDENTIAL 0.29 0.17 0.00

2013 20130203 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.02 0.00 0.00

2013 20130204 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.28 0.07 0.00

2013 20130205 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.02 0.01 0.00
Appendix B-2

Indirect Source Review On-Site Project List 20

Project 

Year Project ID Project Type

Onsite NOX

 Reduction 

(tons per 

year)

Onsite Dust 

 Reduction 

(tons per 

year)

Onsite Exhaust 

Reduction (tons 

per year)

2013 20130207 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.13 0.07 0.00

2013 20130208 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2013 20130211 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.31 0.29 0.12

2013 20130212 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 4.50 0.32 0.32

2013 20130213 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.49 0.08 0.08

2013 20130214 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2013 20130215 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 0.40 0.05 0.05

2013 20130216 RESIDENTIAL 0.06 0.04 0.00

2013 20130218 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2013 20130219 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.08 0.11 0.00

2013 20130220 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2013 20130226 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.94 0.09 0.09

2013 20130227 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2013 20130230 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 1.83 0.23 0.23

2013 20130231 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.02 0.01 0.00

2013 20130233 NONRESIDENTIAL 1.00 0.15 0.15

2013 20130234 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 2.72 0.27 0.27

2013 20130235 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 0.00 0.00 0.00

2013 20130236 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2013 20130237 RESIDENTIAL 0.09 0.17 0.00

2013 20130239 MIXED USE 0.54 0.08 0.08

2013 20130240 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.25 0.09 0.00

2013 20130242 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.21 0.08 0.00

2013 20130243 MIXED USE 0.35 0.11 0.01

2013 20130253 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2013 20130254 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2013 20130255 NONRESIDENTIAL 3.60 0.45 0.45

2013 20130256 RESIDENTIAL 0.91 0.52 0.13

2013 20130258 RESIDENTIAL 0.42 0.25 0.06

2013 20130259 RESIDENTIAL 1.33 0.42 0.17

2013 20130260 RESIDENTIAL 0.87 0.91 0.12

2013 20130261 RESIDENTIAL 0.67 0.33 0.09

2013 20130263 RESIDENTIAL 0.88 0.13 0.13

2013 20130264 RESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2013 20130265 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 0.70 0.09 0.09

2013 20130269 RESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2013 20130271 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.26 0.09 0.00

2013 20130272 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.03 0.01 0.00

2013 20130274 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.20 0.07 0.00

2013 20130275 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.26 0.05 0.00

2013 20130276 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.42 0.07 0.07

2013 20130277 RESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2013 20130281 RESIDENTIAL 1.17 0.16 0.16

2013 20130282 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2013 20130284 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.70 0.09 0.06

2013 20130285 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.70 0.09 0.06

2013 20130289 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.04 0.01 0.00

2013 20130291 RESIDENTIAL 0.72 0.10 0.10
Appendix B-2

Indirect Source Review On-Site Project List 21

Project 

Year Project ID Project Type

Onsite NOX

 Reduction 

(tons per 

year)

Onsite Dust 

 Reduction 

(tons per 

year)

Onsite Exhaust 

Reduction (tons 

per year)

2013 20130292 TRANSPORT/TRANSIT 2.24 0.27 0.27

2013 20130293 NONRESIDENTIAL 0.00 0.00 0.00

2013 20130297 RESIDENTIAL 0.45 0.12 0.06

148.73 34.04 14.88

3,184.70 673.06 81.37

1.11 0.24 0.03

673.06

2861

0.24

0.04

81.37

2861

0.03

0.03

Total PM2.5 Dust and Exhaust Emission Reductions (tons per day) 0.06

Total PM2.5

PM2.5 Dust

total onsite PM10 exhaust emission reductions from 2006 to 2013 (tons)

total number of days

tons per day of PM10 exhaust reduction

tons per day of PM2.5 exhaust reduction (exhaust PM2.5/PM10 fraction @ 92%

total onsite PM10 dust emission reductions from 2006 to 2013 (tons)

total number of days

tons per day of PM10 dust reduction

tons per day of PM2.5 dust reduction (dust PM2.5/PM10 fraction @15%)

PM2.5 Exhaust

2013 Subtotal (tons per year)

Total (tons per day)

Total (tons per year) :
Appendix B-3

District-Funded Incentive Projects 1

Project 

Identification

Unit 

Number Component Component Option Primary Function

Project 

Life 

(years)

Implementation 

Date

2014 NOx 

Adjusted 

Percent 

Operation

 (ton/year)

2014 PM2.5 

Adjusted 

Percent 

Operation 

(tons/year)

S-1612 6 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 11/5/2009 0.92 0.02

C-2584 1 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 11/30/2009 0.42 0.01

C-2584 2 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 11/30/2009 0.42 0.01

C-2584 3 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 11/30/2009 0.42 0.01

C-2584 4 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 11/30/2009 0.42 0.01

C-2584 5 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 11/30/2009 0.42 0.01

C-9655-A 1 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 4/26/2011 0.49 0.03

C-9973-A 1 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 4/27/2011 0.49 0.00

C-9990-A 1 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 5/2/2011 0.34 0.02

C-6015-A 1 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 5/23/2011 0.46 0.00

C-8190-A 1 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 5/25/2011 0.49 0.00

C-5714-A 1 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 6/16/2011 0.93 0.01

C-7807-A 1 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 6/22/2011 0.55 0.02

C-9676-A 1 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 6/27/2011 0.23 0.00

C-9880-A 1 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 7/11/2011 1.34 0.05

C-9676-A 2 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 7/14/2011 0.23 0.00

S-1858-A 1 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 7/24/2011 1.61 0.07

C-3906-A 1 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 8/23/2011 2.62 0.12

0.04 0.00

N-1276 1 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 20 4/6/2011 5.65 0.32

N-1276 2 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 20 3/5/2012 5.65 0.32

N-1276 3 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 20 3/5/2012 5.65 0.32

N-1276 4 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 20 3/29/2012 5.65 0.32

N-1276 5 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 20 3/29/2012 6.44 0.36

S-1470-A 1 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 20 3/31/2012 6.51 0.30

C-19702-A 1 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 20 6/22/2012 4.38 0.10

C-19702-A 2 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 20 6/22/2012 3.32 0.08

S-1470-A 2 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 20 9/7/2012 6.51 0.30

C-20805-A 1 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 20 10/23/2012 3.30 0.08

S-1470-A 3 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 20 11/26/2012 6.51 0.30

S-1470-A 4 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 20 11/26/2012 6.51 0.30

N-1210 1 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 15 2/19/2009 8.36 0.26

N-1210 2 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 15 3/6/2009 8.36 0.26

SJVAPCD Administered SIP-Creditable Incentive Project List

Ag Engine, Repower, Irrigation Pump, The Carl Moyer Program 2008 Guidelines, Chpt 10

Ag Engine, Repower, Irrigation Pump, The Carl Moyer Program 2005 Guidelines, Chpt 10

Subtotal in Tons per Day
Appendix B-3

District-Funded Incentive Projects 2

Project 

Identification

Unit 

Number Component Component Option Primary Function

Project 

Life 

(years)

Implementation 

Date

2014 NOx 

Adjusted 

Percent 

Operation

 (ton/year)

2014 PM2.5 

Adjusted 

Percent 

Operation 

(tons/year)

S-1217 1 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 1/28/2009 0.50 0.01

C-2361 1 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 1/28/2009 1.76 0.06

C-2235 3 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 1/30/2009 0.42 0.01

C-2235 8 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 2/4/2009 0.56 0.01

S-1217 2 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 2/16/2009 0.50 0.01

C-2235 10 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 2/19/2009 0.42 0.01

S-1217 6 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 2/19/2009 0.50 0.01

S-1537 2 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 2/22/2009 1.05 0.04

S-1217 5 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 3/11/2009 1.16 0.03

C-2033 1 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 3/19/2009 1.40 0.03

C-2033 2 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 3/19/2009 2.53 0.06

C-2033 3 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 3/19/2009 1.86 0.04

C-2033 4 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 3/19/2009 1.60 0.04

C-2227 2 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 3/31/2009 1.57 0.04

C-2228 5 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 3/31/2009 0.75 0.02

C-2230 4 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 3/31/2009 1.05 0.02

C-2235 2 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 3/31/2009 0.42 0.01

S-1217 4 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 4/16/2009 0.50 0.01

C-2235 7 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 4/17/2009 0.27 0.01

C-2235 9 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 4/17/2009 0.42 0.01

C-2023 1 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 4/24/2009 0.04 0.00

C-2023 2 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 4/24/2009 0.04 0.00

C-2023 3 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 4/24/2009 0.04 0.00

C-2023 4 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 4/24/2009 0.04 0.00

C-2023 5 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 4/24/2009 0.04 0.00

C-2023 6 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 4/24/2009 0.04 0.00

C-2023 7 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 4/24/2009 0.05 0.00

C-2023 8 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 4/24/2009 0.05 0.00

C-2201 1 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 4/28/2009 0.83 0.02

C-2279 1 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 4/30/2009 1.56 0.04

S-1426 1 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 5/7/2009 0.83 0.02

C-2227 3 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 5/18/2009 1.25 0.03

C-2228 6 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 5/18/2009 1.25 0.03

S-1216 1 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 5/18/2009 0.24 0.00

C-2229 5 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 5/19/2009 1.25 0.03

S-1426 2 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 5/22/2009 0.73 0.02
Appendix B-3

District-Funded Incentive Projects 3

Project 

Identification

Unit 

Number Component Component Option Primary Function

Project 

Life 

(years)

Implementation 

Date

2014 NOx 

Adjusted 

Percent 

Operation

 (ton/year)

2014 PM2.5 

Adjusted 

Percent 

Operation 

(tons/year)

C-2454 1 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 5/25/2009 0.31 0.01

S-1426 4 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 5/28/2009 1.39 0.03

C-2202 1 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 5/29/2009 0.83 0.02

S-1252 3 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 5/30/2009 0.70 0.02

S-1426 5 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 6/28/2009 0.83 0.02

S-1426 6 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 6/28/2009 0.83 0.02

C-2227 5 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 6/30/2009 1.04 0.02

S-1217 3 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 6/30/2009 0.42 0.01

S-1426 3 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 7/2/2009 1.04 0.02

C-2463 1 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 7/8/2009 0.76 0.02

C-2463 3 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 7/8/2009 0.76 0.02

C-2463 4 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 7/8/2009 1.00 0.00

C-2463 5 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 7/8/2009 1.00 0.02

C-2229 4 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 7/27/2009 0.83 0.02

S-1254 1 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 7/27/2009 0.60 0.01

C-1999 1 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 7/31/2009 1.88 0.01

C-1999 2 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 7/31/2009 1.88 0.01

C-1999 4 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 7/31/2009 1.88 0.01

C-2228 3 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 7/31/2009 1.25 0.03

C-2495 2 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 7/31/2009 0.79 0.02

C-2495 3 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 7/31/2009 1.25 0.03

C-2495 5 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 7/31/2009 0.50 0.01

C-2495 6 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 7/31/2009 0.42 0.01

S-1630 1 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 8/5/2009 0.25 0.01

S-1455 1 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 8/10/2009 0.51 0.01

S-1455 2 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 8/10/2009 0.67 0.02

S-1456 1 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 8/10/2009 0.67 0.02

S-1645 4 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 8/10/2009 0.52 0.00

S-1645 5 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 8/10/2009 0.83 0.02

S-1619 1 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 8/13/2009 0.67 0.02

S-1645 1 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 8/15/2009 0.83 0.02

S-1645 2 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 8/15/2009 0.52 0.01

S-1645 3 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 8/15/2009 0.52 0.01

S-1645 6 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 8/15/2009 0.52 0.01

C-2228 1 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 8/17/2009 1.50 0.04

N-1214 1 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 8/17/2009 0.37 0.01
Appendix B-3

District-Funded Incentive Projects 4

Project 

Identification

Unit 

Number Component Component Option Primary Function

Project 

Life 

(years)

Implementation 

Date

2014 NOx 

Adjusted 

Percent 

Operation

 (ton/year)

2014 PM2.5 

Adjusted 

Percent 

Operation 

(tons/year)

C-2544 1 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 8/26/2009 0.35 0.01

C-2654 2 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 8/28/2009 2.04 0.07

S-1619 2 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 9/8/2009 0.67 0.02

S-1619 3 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 9/8/2009 0.67 0.02

S-1612 7 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 9/12/2009 1.00 0.02

S-1418 1 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 9/15/2009 0.91 0.02

S-1536 2 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 9/22/2009 0.57 0.01

S-1536 3 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 9/22/2009 0.57 0.01

S-1536 5 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 9/22/2009 0.37 0.01

S-1536 1 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 9/26/2009 0.37 0.01

C-2654 1 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 10/14/2009 2.04 0.07

C-2227 1 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 10/30/2009 1.31 0.03

C-2227 4 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 10/30/2009 0.83 0.02

C-2228 2 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 10/30/2009 1.04 0.02

C-2228 4 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 10/30/2009 0.67 0.02

C-2229 1 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 10/30/2009 1.25 0.03

C-2229 2 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 10/30/2009 1.25 0.03

C-2229 3 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 10/30/2009 1.57 0.04

C-2230 1 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 10/30/2009 1.00 0.02

C-2230 2 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 10/30/2009 1.00 0.02

C-2230 3 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 10/30/2009 0.67 0.02

C-2230 5 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 10/30/2009 0.33 0.01

C-2230 6 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 10/30/2009 1.00 0.02

S-1384 1 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 10/30/2009 1.67 0.04

S-1612 2 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 10/30/2009 0.92 0.02

S-1612 3 Ag Engine Ag Alt. Fuel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 10/30/2009 1.25 0.03

C-2584 6 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Diesel Irrigation Pump 10 11/30/2009 0.58 0.01

S-1624 2 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 12/9/2009 0.48 0.01

S-1624 3 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 12/9/2009 0.68 0.02

S-1624 4 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 12/9/2009 0.68 0.02

S-1624 5 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 12/9/2009 0.68 0.02

S-1624 6 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 12/9/2009 1.25 0.03

S-1624 7 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 12/9/2009 0.68 0.02

S-1624 9 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 12/9/2009 0.82 0.02

S-1612 5 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 12/10/2009 0.83 0.02

S-1238 1 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 12/14/2009 0.55 0.01
Appendix B-3

District-Funded Incentive Projects 5

Project 

Identification

Unit 

Number Component Component Option Primary Function

Project 

Life 

(years)

Implementation 

Date

2014 NOx 

Adjusted 

Percent 

Operation

 (ton/year)

2014 PM2.5 

Adjusted 

Percent 

Operation 

(tons/year)

S-1385 1 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 12/14/2009 0.83 0.02

S-1536 4 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 12/14/2009 0.57 0.01

C-2396 1 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 12/15/2009 1.16 0.03

C-2537 2 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 12/16/2009 0.61 0.01

S-1264 3 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 12/16/2009 0.71 0.02

S-1264 5 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 12/16/2009 0.99 0.02

S-1315 1 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 12/17/2009 1.04 0.02

S-1366 1 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 12/27/2009 1.21 0.03

C-2587 2 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 12/28/2009 1.17 0.03

C-2545 1 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 3/10/2010 0.35 0.01

S-1517-A 1 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 3/30/2010 0.84 0.04

N-1419-A 1 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 3/31/2010 0.33 0.01

S-1867-A 2 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 3/31/2010 0.45 0.02

S-1867-A 5 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 3/31/2010 0.10 0.00

S-1867-A 7 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 3/31/2010 0.50 0.02

S-1867-A 9 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 3/31/2010 0.25 0.01

C-3430-A 1 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 4/2/2010 0.78 0.03

S-1867-A 1 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 4/10/2010 0.10 0.00

S-1867-A 3 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 4/10/2010 0.07 0.00

S-1867-A 4 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 4/10/2010 0.05 0.00

S-1867-A 8 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 4/10/2010 0.28 0.01

C-3720-A 1 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 4/22/2010 0.67 0.03

C-2659-A 1 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 4/26/2010 2.33 0.10

C-3398-A 1 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 4/27/2010 1.11 0.05

S-1867-A 6 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 4/29/2010 0.07 0.00

C-2530-A 1 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 5/28/2010 0.84 0.04

C-2530-A 2 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 5/28/2010 0.84 0.04

C-2530-A 3 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 5/28/2010 0.84 0.04

S-1252 2 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 6/22/2010 0.70 0.02

C-2787-A 2 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 6/24/2010 1.66 0.07

C-3464-A 1 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 6/30/2010 2.16 0.10

C-3464-A 3 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 6/30/2010 1.83 0.08

C-3464-A 4 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 6/30/2010 2.62 0.12

C-3283-A 1 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 6/30/2010 1.11 0.05

S-1893-A 1 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 7/8/2010 0.67 0.03

C-2579-A 2 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 7/30/2010 1.95 0.09
Appendix B-3

District-Funded Incentive Projects 6

Project 

Identification

Unit 

Number Component Component Option Primary Function

Project 

Life 

(years)

Implementation 

Date

2014 NOx 

Adjusted 

Percent 

Operation

 (ton/year)

2014 PM2.5 

Adjusted 

Percent 

Operation 

(tons/year)

C-8851-A 1 Ag Engine Ag New Electric Motor Irrigation Pump 10 9/21/2011 0.29 0.01

C-7410-A 1 Ag Engine Ag New Electric Motor Irrigation Pump 10 9/30/2011 2.12 0.07

0.57 0.02

C-2584 7 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Diesel Irrigation Pump 10 11/30/2009 0.58 0.01

C-2584 8 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Diesel Irrigation Pump 10 11/30/2009 0.58 0.01

C-2584 9 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Diesel Irrigation Pump 10 11/30/2009 0.58 0.01

S-1640 1 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Diesel Irrigation Pump 10 12/7/2009 0.90 0.02

S-1640 2 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Diesel Irrigation Pump 10 12/7/2009 1.09 0.03

S-1640 3 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Diesel Irrigation Pump 10 12/7/2009 1.09 0.03

S-1624 1 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Diesel Irrigation Pump 10 12/9/2009 0.96 0.02

C-2787-A 1 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 8/13/2010 1.66 0.07

C-2703-A 1 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 10/4/2010 2.33 0.10

C-2703-A 2 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 10/4/2010 2.33 0.10

C-4162-A 1 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 10/12/2010 0.56 0.02

C-3721-A 1 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 10/29/2010 0.45 0.02

C-4002-A 1 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 11/8/2010 2.86 0.13

C-3828-A 1 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 11/17/2010 1.78 0.08

C-3948-A 1 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 12/1/2010 1.33 0.06

C-3806-A 1 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 12/13/2010 1.95 0.09

C-4080-A 1 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 12/30/2010 0.56 0.02

C-4001-A 1 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 1/31/2011 3.60 0.16

C-3457-A 1 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 3/21/2011 2.33 0.10

C-4562-A 1 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 3/23/2011 1.24 0.01

C-7512-A 1 Ag Engine Ag Diesel to Elec Irrigation Pump 10 4/13/2011 1.29 0.01

C-13541-A 1 Ag Engine Ag New Electric Motor Irrigation Pump 10 10/31/2011 0.59 0.00

0.08 0.00

C-9879-A 1 Off-Road Engine Repower Agricultural Tractor 10 12/16/2011 1.08 0.04

C-7509-A 1 Off-Road Engine Repower Agricultural Tractor 10 1/6/2012 0.93 0.01

C-17421-A 1 Off-Road Engine Repower Combine 10 1/27/2012 0.46 0.00

C-18716-A 1 Off-Road Engine Repower Other Agricultural 10 2/28/2012 0.52 0.00

C-17645-A 1 Off-Road Engine Repower & Retrofit Combine 10 3/23/2012 0.45 0.00

C-17646-A 1 Off-Road Engine Repower & Retrofit Combine 10 3/23/2012 0.77 0.00

0.01 0.00

Ag Engine, Repower, Irrigation Pump, The Carl Moyer Program 2011 Guidelines, Chapter 10

Subtotal in Tons per Day

Subtotal in Tons per Day

Subtotal in Tons per Day

Off-Road Equipment - Mobile Agricultural, Engine Repower and Retrofit, The Carl Moyer Program 2008 Guidelines, Chapter 5
Appendix B-3

District-Funded Incentive Projects 7

Project 

Identification

Unit 

Number Component Component Option Primary Function

Project 

Life 

(years)

Implementation 

Date

2014 NOx 

Adjusted 

Percent 

Operation

 (ton/year)

2014 PM2.5 

Adjusted 

Percent 

Operation 

(tons/year)

C-14117-A 1 Off-Road Engine Repower Sprayer 10 3/7/2012 0.43 0.02

C-17716-A 1 Off-Road Engine Repower Sprayer 10 3/19/2012 0.46 0.00

0.00 0.00

C-18620-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Ag Forage Harvester 10 4/16/2012 0.24 0.00

C-19174-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 5/17/2012 0.51 0.00

C-18579-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 5/21/2012 0.03 0.00

C-16508-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 5/31/2012 2.12 0.01

C-19294-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 6/7/2012 0.37 0.00

C-18930-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 6/20/2012 0.33 0.01

C-18087-A 7 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 6/26/2012 0.39 0.00

C-18087-A 8 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 6/26/2012 0.39 0.00

C-19029-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 6/26/2012 0.74 0.00

C-19955-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 6/26/2012 0.37 0.00

C-17914-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 8/8/2012 0.19 0.01

C-18876-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 8/10/2012 0.25 0.00

C-18651-A 2 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 9/5/2012 1.00 0.03

C-18978-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 9/14/2012 1.00 0.03

C-20410-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 9/17/2012 0.56 0.00

C-19735-A 2 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 9/26/2012 0.48 0.02

C-7525-A* 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 11/15/2012 0.28 0.01

C-7525-A* 2 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 11/15/2012 0.00 0.00

C-20022-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 11/28/2012 0.00 0.01

C-18577-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 12/4/2012 0.77 0.00

C-7561-A* 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 12/21/2012 0.18 0.01

C-7561-A* 2 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 12/21/2012 0.00 0.00

C-8751-A* 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 3/8/2013 3.86 0.14

C-8751-A* 2 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 3/8/2013 0.00 0.00

C-23556-A* 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 5/9/2013 1.06 0.01

C-23556-A* 2 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 5/9/2013 0.00 0.00

S-1091 2 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 1/5/2009 0.14 0.00

S-1150 2 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 1/5/2009 3.77 0.13

C-1946 2 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 1/27/2009 0.17 0.00

C-1946 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 1/29/2009 0.20 0.00

C-1946 3 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 1/29/2009 0.12 0.00

Off-Road Equipment - Mobile Agricultural, Engine Repower, The Carl Moyer Program 2011 Guidelines, Chapter 7

Off-Road Equipment - Mobile Agricultural, Vehicle Replacement, The Carl Moyer Program 2011 Guidelines, Chapter 9

Subtotal in Tons per Day
Appendix B-3

District-Funded Incentive Projects 8

Project 

Identification

Unit 

Number Component Component Option Primary Function

Project 

Life 

(years)

Implementation 

Date

2014 NOx 

Adjusted 

Percent 

Operation

 (ton/year)

2014 PM2.5 

Adjusted 

Percent 

Operation 

(tons/year)

S-1091 3 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 1/30/2009 0.24 0.01

N-0968 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 1/30/2009 3.22 0.03

N-0970 3 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 3/23/2009 2.19 0.01

N-0968 2 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 3/24/2009 2.33 0.01

N-0970 4 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 4/13/2009 3.40 0.02

C-1993 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 4/22/2009 0.25 0.02

C-1993 2 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 4/22/2009 0.25 0.02

C-2009 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 4/23/2009 0.25 0.02

C-2009 2 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 4/23/2009 0.25 0.02

C-2009 3 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 4/23/2009 0.36 0.02

C-2009 4 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 4/23/2009 0.36 0.02

N-0970 2 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 4/29/2009 2.60 0.01

N-0970 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 4/30/2009 4.30 0.14

S-1150 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 4/30/2009 3.77 0.13

C-2004 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 5/10/2009 0.78 0.02

C-2434 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 6/23/2009 0.68 0.02

C-2061 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 7/8/2009 0.26 0.01

C-2440 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 9/23/2009 0.18 0.01

N-1188 23 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 1/18/2010 0.26 0.01

C-1979 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 1/26/2010 0.34 0.01

C-1979 2 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 1/26/2010 0.34 0.01

C-1979 4 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 1/26/2010 0.34 0.01

N-1188 21 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 1/29/2010 0.26 0.01

C-1979 5 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 2/17/2010 0.34 0.01

C-1979 6 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 2/17/2010 0.34 0.01

N-1188 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 2/23/2010 0.67 0.05

C-1954 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 2/26/2010 0.18 0.00

C-1979 3 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 3/4/2010 0.34 0.01

C-2036 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 3/4/2010 0.15 0.01

N-1188 3 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 4/14/2010 0.67 0.00

N-1188 11 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 4/22/2010 0.67 0.00

N-1188 15 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 4/29/2010 0.72 0.04

N-1188 7 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 5/11/2010 0.30 0.00

C-3585-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 6/16/2010 0.38 0.07

N-1188 9 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 6/18/2010 0.30 0.00

N-1188 5 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 6/28/2010 0.30 0.00
Appendix B-3

District-Funded Incentive Projects 9

Project 

Identification

Unit 

Number Component Component Option Primary Function

Project 

Life 

(years)

Implementation 

Date

2014 NOx 

Adjusted 

Percent 

Operation

 (ton/year)

2014 PM2.5 

Adjusted 

Percent 

Operation 

(tons/year)

N-1163-A 3 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 6/29/2010 1.97 0.13

C-3346-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 7/13/2010 0.36 0.05

N-1188 13 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 7/23/2010 0.67 0.00

C-3585-A 2 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 7/26/2010 0.38 0.07

N-1188 17 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 7/28/2010 0.72 0.04

C-3587-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 8/17/2010 0.16 0.03

C-3633-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 8/19/2010 0.20 0.01

C-4072-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 8/19/2010 0.02 0.01

C-3894-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 8/20/2010 0.20 0.01

N-1277-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 9/13/2010 0.37 0.06

N-1163-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 9/15/2010 1.97 0.13

N-1195 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 9/21/2010 2.12 0.07

C-3305-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 9/27/2010 0.79 0.12

S-1863-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 9/30/2010 0.88 0.03

C-3894-A 2 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 10/5/2010 0.28 0.01

C-4021-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 10/14/2010 0.16 0.01

C-4057-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 10/26/2010 0.40 0.02

C-4021-A 2 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 10/29/2010 0.16 0.01

C-4055-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 11/9/2010 0.85 0.02

C-3592-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 11/24/2010 0.74 0.00

C-3868-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 12/10/2010 1.89 0.08

C-3868-A 2 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 12/10/2010 1.89 0.08

C-3305-A 2 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 12/16/2010 1.10 0.12

C-3832-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 12/31/2010 0.19 0.01

C-4189-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 2/25/2011 2.29 0.00

C-10122-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 5/9/2011 0.18 0.01

C-3920-A 4 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 6/8/2011 0.73 0.05

C-3975-A 30 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 6/22/2011 0.47 0.03

N-1277-A 3 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 6/28/2011 0.16 0.03

C-7513-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 6/29/2011 0.45 0.00

C-7791-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 6/30/2011 2.62 0.10

C-3975-A 6 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 7/7/2011 0.29 0.03

C-3975-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 8/15/2011 0.29 0.03

C-3975-A 29 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 8/15/2011 0.47 0.03

C-3975-A 31 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 8/31/2011 0.47 0.03

C-3975-A 28 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 9/26/2011 0.47 0.03
Appendix B-3

District-Funded Incentive Projects 10

Project 

Identification

Unit 

Number Component Component Option Primary Function

Project 

Life 

(years)

Implementation 

Date

2014 NOx 

Adjusted 

Percent 

Operation

 (ton/year)

2014 PM2.5 

Adjusted 

Percent 

Operation 

(tons/year)

C-3975-A 4 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 9/30/2011 0.29 0.03

C-3975-A 2 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 10/21/2011 0.29 0.03

C-3975-A 3 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 10/31/2011 0.29 0.03

C-3975-A 5 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 10/31/2011 0.29 0.03

C-3975-A 27 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 11/1/2011 0.47 0.03

C-3975-A 7 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 11/9/2011 0.40 0.02

C-3975-A 14 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 11/9/2011 0.40 0.02

C-7791-A 2 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 11/28/2011 2.42 0.09

C-3975-A 17 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 12/1/2011 0.40 0.02

C-3975-A 18 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 12/1/2011 0.40 0.02

C-3975-A 20 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 12/1/2011 0.40 0.02

C-3975-A 9 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 12/12/2011 0.40 0.02

C-3975-A 10 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 12/12/2011 0.40 0.02

C-3975-A 23 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 12/12/2011 0.40 0.02

C-3975-A 11 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 12/22/2011 0.40 0.02

C-3975-A 15 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 12/22/2011 0.40 0.02

C-3975-A 22 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 12/22/2011 0.40 0.02

C-3975-A 25 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 12/22/2011 0.40 0.02

C-7791-A 5 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 12/27/2011 2.62 0.11

C-7791-A 7 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 12/27/2011 2.42 0.09

C-3975-A 8 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 1/12/2012 0.40 0.02

C-3975-A 13 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 1/12/2012 0.40 0.02

C-3975-A 16 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 1/12/2012 0.40 0.02

C-3975-A 24 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 1/12/2012 0.40 0.02

C-3975-A 12 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 1/30/2012 0.40 0.02

C-3975-A 19 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 1/30/2012 0.40 0.02

C-3975-A 21 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 1/30/2012 0.40 0.02

C-3975-A 26 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 1/30/2012 0.40 0.02

C-7791-A 3 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 1/30/2012 2.83 0.11

C-7791-A 4 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 2/15/2012 2.62 0.11

C-7791-A 6 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 2/15/2012 2.62 0.10

C-7791-A 8 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 2/17/2012 2.83 0.11

C-7791-A 9 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 2/17/2012 2.62 0.11

C-3726-A 4 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 4/25/2012 0.37 0.00

C-3726-A 12 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 4/26/2012 0.37 0.00

C-3726-A 13 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 5/9/2012 0.37 0.00
Appendix B-3

District-Funded Incentive Projects 11

Project 

Identification

Unit 

Number Component Component Option Primary Function

Project 

Life 

(years)

Implementation 

Date

2014 NOx 

Adjusted 

Percent 

Operation

 (ton/year)

2014 PM2.5 

Adjusted 

Percent 

Operation 

(tons/year)

C-3726-A 2 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 6/26/2012 0.37 0.00

C-19554-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 7/5/2012 0.12 0.01

C-3726-A 7 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 7/13/2012 0.37 0.00

C-3726-A 15 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 7/27/2012 0.37 0.00

S-1767-A 11 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 8/6/2012 0.41 0.02

C-3726-A 14 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 8/10/2012 0.37 0.00

C-3726-A 6 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 9/5/2012 0.37 0.00

C-3726-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 10/9/2012 0.37 0.00

C-3726-A 10 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 10/12/2012 0.37 0.00

C-3726-A 3 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 11/1/2012 0.37 0.00

C-3726-A 8 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 11/1/2012 0.37 0.00

C-3726-A 9 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 11/15/2012 0.37 0.00

C-3726-A 16 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 11/15/2012 0.37 0.00

C-3726-A 5 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 12/4/2012 0.37 0.00

C-3726-A 11 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 12/6/2012 0.37 0.00

C-20318-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 12/20/2012 0.74 0.03

C-4105-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 7 2/27/2013 0.29 0.02

C-1898 24 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 6 1/6/2009 0.31 0.03

C-2105 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 6 1/15/2009 2.37 0.01

C-1898 11 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 6 2/2/2009 0.63 0.03

C-1898 17 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 6 2/2/2009 0.37 0.00

C-1898 18 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 6 2/2/2009 0.18 0.00

N-1101 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 6 2/16/2009 1.14 0.05

N-1101 10 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 6 2/16/2009 1.40 0.01

N-1101 15 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 6 2/16/2009 1.23 0.05

N-1101 17 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 6 2/16/2009 1.23 0.05

C-21225-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 5/10/2013 0.21 0.01288

C-21232-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 5/10/2013 0.62 0.0184

C-8206-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 5/10/2013 0.34 0.01932

C-21600-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 5/13/2013 0.46 0.0184

C-21152-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 5/15/2013 0.42 0.02484

C-21153-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 5/15/2013 0.83 0.046

C-22246-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 5/15/2013 0.03 0.00644

C-22248-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 5/15/2013 0.04 0.01012

C-21299-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 5/16/2013 0.16 0.0092

C-21659-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 5/16/2013 0.89 0.04232
Appendix B-3

District-Funded Incentive Projects 12

Project 

Identification

Unit 

Number Component Component Option Primary Function

Project 

Life 

(years)

Implementation 

Date

2014 NOx 

Adjusted 

Percent 

Operation

 (ton/year)

2014 PM2.5 

Adjusted 

Percent 

Operation 

(tons/year)

C-21478-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 5/17/2013 0.05 0.00552

C-21842-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 5/17/2013 0.28 0.01288

C-21129-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 5/20/2013 0.87 0.05336

C-21285-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 5/20/2013 1.34 0.04048

C-21305-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 5/20/2013 0.30 0.0184

C-21306-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 5/20/2013 0.69 0.023

C-21563-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 5/20/2013 0.01 0.00276

C-21605-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 5/20/2013 0.05 0.01196

C-21608-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 5/20/2013 0.05 0.01196

C-21610-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 5/20/2013 0.05 0.01012

C-21640-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 5/20/2013 0.05 0.01196

C-22794-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 5/21/2013 2.39 0.11592

C-7499-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 5/21/2013 0.44 0.02484

C-8314-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 5/21/2013 0.06 0.00276

C-21574-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 5/22/2013 0.70 0.0322

C-21578-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 5/22/2013 0.21 0.01104

C-7433-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 5/22/2013 0.37 0.02944

C-8149-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 5/23/2013 0.05 0.00276

C-8709-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 5/23/2013 0.54 0.023

C-21273-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 5/24/2013 0.40 0.01564

C-21377-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 5/24/2013 0.03 0.00368

C-21819-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 5/24/2013 0.14 0.00644

C-22500-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 5/24/2013 0.95 0.01932

C-22501-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 5/24/2013 1.06 0.04232

C-21250-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 5/28/2013 0.23 0.01748

C-21818-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 5/29/2013 0.15 0.00828

C-21903-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 5/29/2013 0.15 0.00828

C-21214-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 5/30/2013 0.31 0.01748

C-21597-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 5/30/2013 0.12 0.00736

C-21598-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 5/30/2013 0.93 0.05796

C-21519-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 5/31/2013 0.07 0.00828

C-21581-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 5/31/2013 0.41 0.01932

C-21583-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 5/31/2013 0.29 0.01748

C-21585-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 5/31/2013 0.31 0.01472

C-21602-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 5/31/2013 0.75 0.0322

C-21993-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 5/31/2013 0.01 0.00276
Appendix B-3

District-Funded Incentive Projects 13

Project 

Identification

Unit 

Number Component Component Option Primary Function

Project 

Life 

(years)

Implementation 

Date

2014 NOx 

Adjusted 

Percent 

Operation

 (ton/year)

2014 PM2.5 

Adjusted 

Percent 

Operation 

(tons/year)

C-8450-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 5/31/2013 0.31 0.01288

C-21337-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 6/3/2013 0.27 0.01656

C-21346-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 6/3/2013 0.49 0.023

C-21388-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 6/3/2013 0.56 0.01656

C-21389-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 6/3/2013 0.63 0.0184

C-22626-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 6/4/2013 1.98 0.07636

C-8497-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 6/4/2013 0.01 0.001748

C-8499-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 6/4/2013 0.01 0.003496

C-21460-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 6/7/2013 0.20 0.01196

C-21625-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 6/11/2013 0.30 0.0138

C-21380-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 6/12/2013 0.21 0.01288

C-21404-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 6/12/2013 0.12 0.00736

C-22325-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 6/12/2013 0.45 0.02116

C-21465-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 6/14/2013 0.21 0.01196

C-21466-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 6/14/2013 0.34 0.0184

C-21470-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 6/17/2013 0.73 0.02576

C-21471-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 6/17/2013 0.58 0.05796

C-21472-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 6/17/2013 1.07 0.06164

C-21473-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 6/17/2013 0.26 0.02852

C-8530-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 6/17/2013 0.26 0.01564

C-21322-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 6/18/2013 0.81 0.03312

C-21976-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 6/18/2013 0.02 0.0046

C-21354-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 6/20/2013 0.23 0.023

C-21357-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 6/20/2013 0.34 0.02116

C-21383-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 6/20/2013 0.19 0.0092

C-21384-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 6/20/2013 0.44 0.02484

C-21385-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 6/20/2013 0.44 0.02484

C-8058-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 6/20/2013 0.69 0.03772

C-21398-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 6/21/2013 1.08 0.0598

C-21757-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 6/24/2013 0.12 0.0046

C-21999-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 6/24/2013 0.52 0.02116

C-23647-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 6/25/2013 0.08 0.00644

C-21365-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 6/26/2013 0.04 0.00276

C-22165-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 6/26/2013 0.24 0.01196

C-22269-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 6/26/2013 0.16 0.00644

C-21764-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 6/27/2013 0.35 0.01656
Appendix B-3

District-Funded Incentive Projects 14

Project 

Identification

Unit 

Number Component Component Option Primary Function

Project 

Life 

(years)

Implementation 

Date

2014 NOx 

Adjusted 

Percent 

Operation

 (ton/year)

2014 PM2.5 

Adjusted 

Percent 

Operation 

(tons/year)

C-22579-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 6/27/2013 0.01 0.00184

C-8795-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 6/27/2013 0.21 0.0138

C-21723-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 6/28/2013 0.15 0.00736

C-22326-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 6/28/2013 0.44 0.02024

C-21379-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 6/29/2013 2.79 0.1104

C-21181-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 7/1/2013 0.01 0.00184

C-21184-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 7/1/2013 0.01 0.00184

C-21186-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 7/1/2013 0.02 0.00276

C-21187-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 7/1/2013 0.02 0.00276

C-21480-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 7/2/2013 0.11 0.00736

C-8427-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 7/2/2013 2.19 0.08924

C-21396-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 7/3/2013 0.02 0.0046

C-21240-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 7/5/2013 0.32 0.0184

C-21317-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 7/5/2013 0.49 0.02116

C-21327-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 7/5/2013 1.22 0.04968

C-21390-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 7/5/2013 0.37 0.02852

C-21175-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 7/8/2013 0.24 0.0184

C-21176-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 7/8/2013 0.25 0.03036

C-21584-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 7/9/2013 0.74 0.02208

C-21256-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 7/10/2013 0.13 0.0092

C-21259-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 7/10/2013 0.25 0.0138

C-21268-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 7/10/2013 0.24 0.01288

C-21289-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 7/10/2013 0.19 0.01472

C-21399-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 7/10/2013 0.10 0.00552

C-22710-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 7/10/2013 0.06 0.0046

C-7555-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 7/10/2013 0.18 0.01012

C-7559-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 7/10/2013 0.17 0.0092

C-8429-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 7/10/2013 1.99 0.07176

C-21910-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 7/11/2013 0.41 0.02024

C-22429-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 7/11/2013 0.71 0.02852

C-8195-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 7/11/2013 1.74 0.06256

C-21523-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 7/12/2013 0.54 0.02944

C-21567-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 7/12/2013 0.08 0.00368

C-22064-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 7/13/2013 0.04 0.00828

C-8535-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 7/15/2013 0.24 0.01472

C-21562-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 7/16/2013 0.09 0.0046
Appendix B-3

District-Funded Incentive Projects 15

Project 

Identification

Unit 

Number Component Component Option Primary Function

Project 

Life 

(years)

Implementation 

Date

2014 NOx 

Adjusted 

Percent 

Operation

 (ton/year)

2014 PM2.5 

Adjusted 

Percent 

Operation 

(tons/year)

C-21330-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 7/17/2013 0.98 0.04324

C-22502-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 7/17/2013 0.12 0.00644

C-22505-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 7/17/2013 0.12 0.00644

C-22506-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 7/17/2013 0.12 0.00644

C-22507-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 7/17/2013 0.22 0.00828

C-21333-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 7/18/2013 0.86 0.04784

C-21302-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 7/19/2013 0.45 0.0276

C-22162-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 7/19/2013 0.29 0.01748

C-21239-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 7/20/2013 1.17 0.02392

C-21243-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 7/20/2013 0.74 0.01472

C-22835-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 7/22/2013 0.19 0.00828

C-21373-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 7/23/2013 0.57 0.02484

C-21507-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 7/23/2013 0.87 0.02668

C-21924-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 7/23/2013 0.58 0.023

C-21977-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 7/23/2013 0.05 0.00276

C-21981-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 7/23/2013 0.02 0.00184

C-21990-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 7/23/2013 0.03 0.00276

C-21851-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 7/24/2013 0.34 0.0276

C-21720-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 7/25/2013 1.10 0.04416

C-21435-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 7/26/2013 0.55 0.03128

C-21711-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 7/26/2013 0.82 0.02392

C-21712-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 7/26/2013 0.32 0.01932

C-22074-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 7/26/2013 1.20 0.04692

C-22075-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 7/26/2013 0.75 0.02944

C-22508-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 7/29/2013 0.76 0.03036

C-22531-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 7/29/2013 0.11 0.0046

C-22329-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 7/30/2013 0.02 0.00368

C-22330-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 7/30/2013 0.02 0.00368

C-8536-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 7/30/2013 0.20 0.01104

C-21328-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 7/31/2013 0.41 0.01656

C-21386-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 7/31/2013 0.76 0.04232

C-21387-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 7/31/2013 0.69 0.03864

C-21743-A 2 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 7/31/2013 0.73 0.01472

C-21820-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 8/2/2013 2.16 0.08648

C-21850-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 8/2/2013 0.67 0.02576

C-8266-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 8/2/2013 0.21 0.01196
Appendix B-3

District-Funded Incentive Projects 16

Project 

Identification

Unit 

Number Component Component Option Primary Function

Project 

Life 

(years)

Implementation 

Date

2014 NOx 

Adjusted 

Percent 

Operation

 (ton/year)

2014 PM2.5 

Adjusted 

Percent 

Operation 

(tons/year)

C-21282-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 8/7/2013 1.26 0.02576

C-21836-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 8/7/2013 0.14 0.00828

C-21448-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 8/8/2013 1.43 0.0552

C-22327-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 8/8/2013 0.43 0.02024

C-21432-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 8/9/2013 0.46 0.05704

C-21433-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 8/9/2013 0.46 0.05704

C-21434-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 8/9/2013 0.55 0.03128

C-21564-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 8/9/2013 0.33 0.0414

C-21673-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 8/9/2013 2.10 0.08372

C-22289-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 8/9/2013 1.00 0.046

C-22663-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 8/9/2013 0.26 0.0138

C-8331-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 8/9/2013 0.35 0.0276

C-8338-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 8/9/2013 0.35 0.0276

C-8347-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 8/9/2013 0.30 0.01656

C-8426-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 8/9/2013 0.35 0.0276

C-8459-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 8/9/2013 0.68 0.02668

C-21361-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 8/13/2013 0.48 0.0276

C-21467-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 8/13/2013 1.66 0.03404

C-21917-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 8/13/2013 0.29 0.01748

C-22265-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 8/14/2013 0.11 0.01196

C-22279-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 8/14/2013 0.25 0.01656

C-21657-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 8/16/2013 1.84 0.06256

C-22186-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 8/16/2013 0.07 0.0046

C-21185-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 8/19/2013 0.10 0.00736

C-22313-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 8/19/2013 0.36 0.01656

C-22349-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 8/19/2013 0.20 0.01196

C-23749-A 2 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 8/21/2013 0.11 0.0046

C-21180-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 8/22/2013 0.28 0.01564

C-21697-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 8/22/2013 0.14 0.00644

C-21978-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 8/22/2013 2.14 0.07636

C-21297-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 8/23/2013 0.15 0.00828

C-21565-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 8/23/2013 0.45 0.02484

C-21875-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 8/23/2013 1.62 0.06256

C-22130-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 8/23/2013 0.45 0.02208

C-22140-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 8/23/2013 0.34 0.02024

C-22263-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 8/23/2013 0.53 0.0184
Appendix B-3

District-Funded Incentive Projects 17

Project 

Identification

Unit 

Number Component Component Option Primary Function

Project 

Life 

(years)

Implementation 

Date

2014 NOx 

Adjusted 

Percent 

Operation

 (ton/year)

2014 PM2.5 

Adjusted 

Percent 

Operation 

(tons/year)

C-22264-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 8/23/2013 0.21 0.00736

C-21878-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 8/26/2013 0.42 0.023

C-22272-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 8/26/2013 0.08 0.00552

C-22278-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 8/26/2013 0.05 0.00368

C-21370-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 8/27/2013 0.62 0.03588

C-21694-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 8/28/2013 0.05 0.0138

C-22219-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 8/28/2013 0.09 0.00552

C-21363-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 8/29/2013 0.94 0.03772

C-21409-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 8/29/2013 3.12 0.12236

C-22530-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 8/29/2013 0.16 0.00644

C-21188-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 8/30/2013 0.31 0.01288

C-21591-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 8/30/2013 0.69 0.03956

C-21284-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 9/1/2013 1.15 0.02208

C-21613-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 9/4/2013 0.17 0.00828

C-22625-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 9/4/2013 0.32 0.01196

C-23364-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 9/4/2013 0.07 0.00368

C-21260-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 9/5/2013 0.43 0.01656

C-21344-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 9/6/2013 1.63 0.03312

C-23490-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 9/6/2013 0.63 0.02576

C-21237-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 9/9/2013 0.78 0.01472

C-21253-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 9/9/2013 0.58 0.02392

C-21255-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 9/9/2013 0.54 0.02208

C-21261-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 9/9/2013 0.87 0.03128

C-21349-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 9/9/2013 0.04 0.0138

C-21397-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 9/9/2013 1.41 0.11224

C-21902-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 9/10/2013 0.12 0.00552

C-21998-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 9/10/2013 0.06 0.00736

C-21722-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 9/11/2013 0.27 0.01288

C-21816-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 9/11/2013 0.20 0.01104

C-21622-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 9/12/2013 0.08 0.0046

C-21894-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 9/12/2013 0.08 0.0046

C-21586-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 9/13/2013 0.23 0.01012

C-21588-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 9/13/2013 0.38 0.01748

C-22054-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 9/13/2013 0.13 0.00644

C-21568-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 9/16/2013 0.69 0.02668

C-21837-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 9/16/2013 0.02 0.00184
Appendix B-3

District-Funded Incentive Projects 18

Project 

Identification

Unit 

Number Component Component Option Primary Function

Project 

Life 

(years)

Implementation 

Date

2014 NOx 

Adjusted 

Percent 

Operation

 (ton/year)

2014 PM2.5 

Adjusted 

Percent 

Operation 

(tons/year)

C-8297-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 9/16/2013 0.38 0.02116

C-21242-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 9/17/2013 0.43 0.00828

C-21286-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 9/17/2013 1.48 0.02852

C-21288-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 9/17/2013 1.66 0.0322

C-21290-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 9/17/2013 1.42 0.0276

C-21291-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 9/17/2013 1.22 0.02392

C-21292-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 9/17/2013 0.95 0.0184

C-21887-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 9/17/2013 1.13 0.00552

C-22578-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 9/17/2013 0.10 0.00644

C-8097-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 9/17/2013 0.63 0.0368

C-22544-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 9/18/2013 0.52 0.02392

C-21207-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 9/19/2013 0.82 0.03404

C-8517-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 9/19/2013 1.23 0.05428

C-22161-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 9/20/2013 0.59 0.03312

C-22323-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 9/20/2013 0.17 0.01012

C-8473-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 9/21/2013 0.40 0.03036

C-21436-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 9/23/2013 0.55 0.03312

C-22193-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 9/23/2013 0.12 0.00552

C-21727-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 9/24/2013 0.01 0.00276

C-21331-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 9/25/2013 0.18 0.00828

C-22431-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 9/25/2013 1.10 0.046

C-8191-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 9/25/2013 1.61 0.06164

C-21815-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 9/26/2013 0.25 0.01196

C-22346-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 9/27/2013 0.36 0.01288

C-8846-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 9/28/2013 0.20 0.0092

C-21674-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 9/29/2013 1.64 0.06624

C-8303-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 9/29/2013 0.26 0.01932

C-8953-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 9/29/2013 0.26 0.01104

C-21374-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 10/1/2013 0.25 0.0138

C-21710-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 10/1/2013 0.59 0.0322

C-21474-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 10/2/2013 0.86 0.03312

C-22164-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 10/2/2013 4.11 0.16008

C-25291-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 10/3/2013 0.24 0.01472

C-7641-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 10/3/2013 0.59 0.0276

C-21980-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 10/7/2013 0.27 0.01472

C-23436-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 10/9/2013 0.85 0.02944
Appendix B-3

District-Funded Incentive Projects 19

Project 

Identification

Unit 

Number Component Component Option Primary Function

Project 

Life 

(years)

Implementation 

Date

2014 NOx 

Adjusted 

Percent 

Operation

 (ton/year)

2014 PM2.5 

Adjusted 

Percent 

Operation 

(tons/year)

C-23443-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 10/9/2013 1.01 0.06256

C-21258-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 10/10/2013 0.67 0.02668

C-22627-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 10/10/2013 0.47 0.02208

C-22661-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 10/10/2013 0.85 0.01748

C-23274-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 10/11/2013 0.17 0.00828

C-21431-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 10/14/2013 0.47 0.02576

C-22143-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 10/14/2013 1.68 0.03496

C-21368-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 10/15/2013 0.98 0.01932

C-21425-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 10/15/2013 0.37 0.02116

C-21824-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 10/15/2013 1.55 0.06256

C-22350-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 10/15/2013 0.25 0.0092

C-21249-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 10/16/2013 1.30 0.02576

C-21252-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 10/16/2013 0.66 0.02668

C-21367-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 10/16/2013 2.73 0.05428

C-21589-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 10/17/2013 0.02 0.00828

C-21590-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 10/17/2013 0.02 0.00828

C-22819-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 10/17/2013 0.35 0.01288

C-21350-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 10/18/2013 0.12 0.00644

C-21682-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 10/21/2013 0.21 0.01012

C-21701-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 10/21/2013 0.10 0.00552

C-21747-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 10/22/2013 0.40 0.01656

C-21879-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 10/22/2013 0.15 0.0092

C-22271-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 10/22/2013 0.53 0.03036

C-22273-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 10/22/2013 1.00 0.03956

C-22322-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 10/22/2013 0.12 0.00552

C-21415-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 10/23/2013 0.21 0.01288

C-21554-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 10/23/2013 0.20 0.01564

C-22669-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 10/23/2013 0.33 0.01196

C-22670-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 10/23/2013 0.29 0.0184

C-22629-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 10/24/2013 1.70 0.07912

C-22810-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 10/24/2013 0.46 0.0276

C-21215-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 10/25/2013 0.50 0.02024

C-21216-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 10/25/2013 0.77 0.03128

C-21236-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 10/25/2013 0.79 0.01564

C-21300-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 10/25/2013 0.57 0.023

C-21620-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 10/25/2013 0.15 0.00828
Appendix B-3

District-Funded Incentive Projects 20

Project 

Identification

Unit 

Number Component Component Option Primary Function

Project 

Life 

(years)

Implementation 

Date

2014 NOx 

Adjusted 

Percent 

Operation

 (ton/year)

2014 PM2.5 

Adjusted 

Percent 

Operation 

(tons/year)

C-21833-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 10/25/2013 0.05 0.00276

C-22621-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 10/26/2013 0.37 0.02944

C-22622-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 10/26/2013 0.37 0.02944

C-22623-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 10/26/2013 0.37 0.02944

C-21441-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 10/28/2013 0.40 0.023

C-22619-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 10/28/2013 0.37 0.02944

C-22620-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 10/28/2013 0.37 0.02944

C-23314-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 10/28/2013 0.45 0.0184

C-22802-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 10/30/2013 1.03 0.04784

C-21628-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 10/31/2013 0.22 0.01196

C-21631-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 10/31/2013 0.22 0.01196

C-21891-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 10/31/2013 1.36 0.0276

C-22610-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 10/31/2013 1.11 0.02208

C-22813-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 10/31/2013 0.12 0.0046

C-8827-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 10/31/2013 0.27 0.02116

C-8828-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 10/31/2013 0.88 0.03956

C-23363-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 11/5/2013 0.16 0.0092

C-22158-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 11/7/2013 0.16 0.01196

C-21679-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 11/8/2013 2.43 0.04784

C-21909-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 11/8/2013 0.54 0.05152

C-22795-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 11/11/2013 0.14 0.0138

C-22314-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 11/12/2013 1.53 0.03036

C-22798-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 11/12/2013 0.88 0.04876

C-22073-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 11/14/2013 1.46 0.05704

C-22434-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 11/14/2013 0.46 0.02116

C-21987-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 11/15/2013 1.55 0.01012

C-21672-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 11/18/2013 1.64 0.06624

C-21192-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 11/19/2013 0.10 0.00644

C-21748-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 11/20/2013 0.23 0.01288

C-22939-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 11/21/2013 1.10 0.06164

C-21675-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 11/22/2013 1.67 0.06624

C-21882-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 11/22/2013 0.46 0.02852

C-22606-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 11/22/2013 0.50 0.0598

C-21355-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 11/25/2013 0.35 0.01656

C-21353-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 11/27/2013 0.64 0.0368

C-21371-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 11/27/2013 0.22 0.0092
Appendix B-3

District-Funded Incentive Projects 21

Project 

Identification

Unit 

Number Component Component Option Primary Function

Project 

Life 

(years)

Implementation 

Date

2014 NOx 

Adjusted 

Percent 

Operation

 (ton/year)

2014 PM2.5 

Adjusted 

Percent 

Operation 

(tons/year)

C-21375-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 11/27/2013 1.24 0.04508

C-22103-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 11/27/2013 0.57 0.04232

C-22105-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 11/27/2013 0.52 0.02852

C-22141-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 11/27/2013 0.77 0.01564

C-23449-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 11/27/2013 0.06 0.00276

C-22947-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 12/2/2013 0.59 0.0322

C-23248-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 12/5/2013 0.61 0.03496

C-21235-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 12/6/2013 0.79 0.01564

C-21693-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 12/6/2013 0.48 0.02392

C-21595-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 12/9/2013 0.67 0.02668

C-21995-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 12/10/2013 1.18 0.0552

C-22420-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 12/10/2013 1.10 0.06348

C-22142-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 12/11/2013 0.67 0.0138

C-22179-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 12/11/2013 0.69 0.03956

C-22182-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 12/11/2013 0.25 0.023

C-23313-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 12/11/2013 1.68 0.06808

C-23315-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 12/11/2013 0.20 0.01196

C-23383-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 12/11/2013 0.13 0.00644

C-23447-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 12/11/2013 0.40 0.01932

C-21817-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 12/12/2013 0.31 0.01748

C-21683-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 12/13/2013 0.51 0.03036

C-21684-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 12/13/2013 0.80 0.04876

C-22055-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 12/17/2013 0.00 0.00184

C-22058-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 12/17/2013 0.00 0.00184

C-22060-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 12/17/2013 0.00 0.00184

C-22062-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 12/17/2013 0.01 0.00184

C-22066-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 12/17/2013 0.04 0.00736

C-22068-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 12/17/2013 0.01 0.00184

C-22069-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 12/17/2013 0.01 0.00184

C-21721-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 12/18/2013 0.24 0.0138

C-21974-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 12/18/2013 0.14 0.0092

C-22767-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 12/18/2013 0.10 0.01012

C-23191-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 12/18/2013 0.20 0.02024

C-21607-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 12/19/2013 0.34 0.01932

C-21896-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 12/19/2013 0.43 0.02484

C-23271-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 12/19/2013 0.18 0.00828
Appendix B-3

District-Funded Incentive Projects 22

Project 

Identification

Unit 

Number Component Component Option Primary Function

Project 

Life 

(years)

Implementation 

Date

2014 NOx 

Adjusted 

Percent 

Operation

 (ton/year)

2014 PM2.5 

Adjusted 

Percent 

Operation 

(tons/year)

C-22003-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 12/20/2013 0.15 0.00828

C-22005-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 12/20/2013 0.22 0.00828

C-22945-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 12/20/2013 0.37 0.01104

C-21898-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 12/23/2013 0.10 0.00736

C-21899-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 12/23/2013 0.10 0.00736

C-22159-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 12/23/2013 0.21 0.01012

C-21734-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 12/26/2013 0.25 0.02024

C-22156-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 12/26/2013 0.13 0.01012

C-22654-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 12/26/2013 0.00 0.00092

C-23153-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 12/26/2013 0.19 0.01196

C-21382-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 12/27/2013 0.16 0.0092

C-21686-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 12/27/2013 0.06 0.0046

C-21762-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 12/27/2013 0.18 0.01012

C-22048-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 12/27/2013 0.55 0.02852

C-22052-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 12/27/2013 0.42 0.0368

C-22492-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 12/27/2013 0.49 0.01012

C-22495-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 12/27/2013 0.14 0.00644

C-23527-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 12/27/2013 0.07 0.00552

C-21413-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 12/30/2013 0.38 0.02852

C-21414-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 12/30/2013 0.45 0.02484

C-21737-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 12/30/2013 0.24 0.01196

C-22031-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 12/30/2013 0.30 0.01288

C-23475-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 12/30/2013 0.07 0.00368

C-21246-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 12/31/2013 1.30 0.02576

C-21251-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 12/31/2013 1.31 0.02576

C-21376-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 12/31/2013 1.07 0.04232

C-21906-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 12/31/2013 0.38 0.02852

C-21907-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 12/31/2013 0.25 0.01932

C-22498-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 12/31/2013 0.25 0.0184

C-22499-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 12/31/2013 0.21 0.01196

C-22806-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 12/31/2013 0.57 0.023

C-22991-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 12/31/2013 0.12 0.0046

C-22992-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 12/31/2013 0.15 0.00828

C-23649-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 12/31/2013 0.41 0.023

C-9009-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Agricultural Tractor 10 12/31/2013 0.11 0.0046

N-1101 2 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Almond Sweeper 6 2/17/2009 1.34 0.06
Appendix B-3

District-Funded Incentive Projects 23

Project 

Identification

Unit 

Number Component Component Option Primary Function

Project 

Life 

(years)

Implementation 

Date

2014 NOx 

Adjusted 

Percent 

Operation

 (ton/year)

2014 PM2.5 

Adjusted 

Percent 

Operation 

(tons/year)

N-1101 4 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Bulk Carrier 6 2/17/2009 0.78 0.03

N-1101 6 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Combine 6 2/17/2009 1.08 0.05

N-1101 7 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Forklift 6 2/17/2009 1.34 0.06

N-1101 16 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Forklift 6 2/17/2009 1.19 0.05

C-2262 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Forklift 6 2/20/2009 0.57 0.00

C-2100 2 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Forklift 6 2/25/2009 1.42 0.06

C-1898 12 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Hay Hauler 6 3/9/2009 1.19 0.04

C-2100 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Swathers 6 3/18/2009 1.87 0.08

C-2100 3 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Swathers 6 3/18/2009 1.32 0.06

C-2100 9 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Tomato Harvester 6 3/18/2009 1.10 0.05

S-1209 3 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Wheel Loader 6 3/18/2009 0.51 0.05

C-2100 7 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Wheel Loader 6 3/25/2009 0.73 0.03

C-2100 8 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Wheel Loader 6 3/25/2009 2.06 0.09

N-1074 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Wheel Loader 6 3/31/2009 0.46 0.04

N-1074 2 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Wheel Loader 6 3/31/2009 0.59 -0.01

N-1074 3 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Wheel Loader 6 3/31/2009 0.96 0.00

S-1365 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Wheel Loader 6 4/14/2009 0.32 0.00

C-2100 6 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Wheel Loader 6 4/16/2009 1.45 0.06

C-1595-B 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Wheel Loader 6 4/30/2009 1.79 0.00

C-2127 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Wheel Loader 6 5/9/2009 1.21 0.01

N-1050 2 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Wheel Loader 6 5/30/2009 0.90 0.03

N-1040 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Wheel Loader 5 2/4/2010 1.07 0.08

C-2507 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Wheel Loader 5 2/10/2010 2.62 0.05

C-2647 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Wheel Loader 5 2/24/2010 1.88 0.08

C-2575 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Wheel Loader 5 3/10/2010 0.42 0.01

C-2564 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Wheel Loader 5 3/15/2010 4.25 0.08

S-1392 5 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Wheel Loader 5 4/19/2010 0.86 0.03

S-1537 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Wheel Loader 5 4/20/2010 1.29 0.06

C-2342 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Wheel Loader 5 4/26/2010 1.34 0.01

S-1599-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Wheel Loader 5 7/15/2010 1.68 0.06

C-3272-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Wheel Loader 5 7/26/2010 0.36 0.06

C-19162-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Wheel Loader 5 6/7/2012 0.41 0.01

C-20022-A 2 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Wheel Loader 5 11/28/2012 0.17 0.02

C-19509-A 3 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Wheel Loader 4 7/12/2012 0.72 0.02

C-21483-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Wheel Loader 4 12/26/2012 1.58 0.04

C-18846-A 14 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Wheel Loader 3 7/24/2012 1.09 0.02
Appendix B-3

District-Funded Incentive Projects 24

Project 

Identification

Unit 

Number Component Component Option Primary Function

Project 

Life 

(years)

Implementation 

Date

2014 NOx 

Adjusted 

Percent 

Operation

 (ton/year)

2014 PM2.5 

Adjusted 

Percent 

Operation 

(tons/year)

C-19509-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Wheel Loader 3 7/26/2012 0.46 0.01

C-18846-A 12 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Wheel Loader 3 7/31/2012 1.09 0.02

C-18846-A 13 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Wheel Loader 3 8/10/2012 1.09 0.02

C-19509-A 4 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Wheel Loader 3 10/19/2012 0.57 0.02

C-18846-A 10 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Wheel Loader 3 11/5/2012 1.09 0.02

C-18846-A 9 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Wheel Loader 3 1/31/2013 1.09 0.02

C-18846-A 11 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Wheel Loader 3 2/27/2013 1.09 0.02

C-19509-A 5 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Wheel Loader 2 1/30/2013 0.81 0.02

C-15883-A 1 Off-Road Vehicle Replacement Wheel Loader 2 10/25/2013 0.22 0.01

1.06 0.04

1.76 0.07

Subtotal in Tons per Day

TOTAL in Tons per Day