alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Maureen D. Howley, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Managing Owner, Preferred Investment Solutions Corp. (the Managing
Owner), of World Monitor Trust  Series B (Series B), hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | Series Bs Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Quarterly Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Series B.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Maureen D. Howley                            
|Maureen D. Howley                                
|Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|November 14, 2005
exv10w4







	 	 	 	 	 



Exhibit 10.4




CKE Restaurants, Inc.




Amendment No. 2

To

Employment Agreement





     This Amendment No. 2 (the “Amendment”) to Employment Agreement is made effective as of
March 20, 2007, by and between CKE Restaurants, Inc. (the “Company”) and Richard E. Fortman
(the “Employee”).



RECITALS:




     A. The Company and the Employee entered into an Employment Agreement dated as of January
2004, and amended on December 6, 2005 (the “Agreement”).



     B. The Company and Employee now desire to amend the Agreement as set forth below.



AGREEMENT




     1. Other Compensation and Fringe Benefits. Section 4(d) of the Agreement is hereby
amended to extend the bonus provided for therein to fiscal years 2008, 2009 and 2010.



     2. Definitions. Terms used but not defined in this Amendment shall have the
respective meanings assigned to them in the Agreement.



     3. Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of
which shall be deemed an original, and all of which shall constitute one Amendment.



     4. Terms and Conditions of Agreement. Except as specifically amended by this
Amendment, all terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect.



[Signature Page Follows]




 









 








     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment is executed by the undersigned as of the date first written
above.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	 	 
	 	    /s/ Richard E. Fortman
 	 
	 	Richard E. Fortman 	 
	 	 	 
	 
	 	CKE Restaurants, Inc.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/ Andrew F. Puzder
 	 
	 	 	Andrew F. Puzder 	 
	 	 	President and Chief Executive Officer 	 
	 




2
Case 2:05-cv-01115-JG Document 51 Filed 12/12/07 Page 1 of 11
Case 2:05-cv-01115-JG Document 51 Filed 12/12/07 Page 2 of 11
Case 2:05-cv-01115-JG Document 51 Filed 12/12/07 Page 3 of 11
Case 2:05-cv-01115-JG Document 51 Filed 12/12/07 Page 4 of 11
Case 2:05-cv-01115-JG Document 51 Filed 12/12/07 Page 5 of 11
Case 2:05-cv-01115-JG Document 51 Filed 12/12/07 Page 6 of 11
Case 2:05-cv-01115-JG Document 51 Filed 12/12/07 Page 7 of 11
Case 2:05-cv-01115-JG Document 51 Filed 12/12/07 Page 8 of 11
Case 2:05-cv-01115-JG Document 51 Filed 12/12/07 Page 9 of 11
Case 2:05-cv-01115-JG Document 51 Filed 12/12/07 Page 10 of 11
Case 2:05-cv-01115-JG Document 51 Filed 12/12/07 Page 11 of 11
# C_2022303EN.01003402.xml

| 8.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 303/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 303/34

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 June 2022 — YT and YU v Commission

(Case T-532/16) (1)

(Civil service - Officials - 2014 reform of the Staff Regulations - Reimbursement of annual travel expenses - Place of origin located in a third country - Flat-rate payment calculated on the basis of the distance separating the place of employment from the capital of the Member State of which the official is a national)

(2022/C 303/41)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: YT, YU (represented by: J.-N. Louis, R. Metz, D. Verbeke, T. Van Lysebeth and N. Maes, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Gattinara and T. Bohr, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: European Parliament (represented by: E. Taneva and M. Ecker, acting as Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and R. Meyer, acting as Agents)

Re:

Applications under Article 270 TFEU for annulment of the decisions to reduce, from 1 January 2014, the reimbursement of annual travel expenses enabling the applicants to maintain a connection with their place of origin.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders YT and YU to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders YT and YU to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;

| 3. | Orders the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union each to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union each to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 89, 16.3.2015 (case initially registered before the European Civil Service Tribunal under Case No F-8/15 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1.9.2016).

---
No. 57950.

protest 207406-K (New York).

#### Economy Trading Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issues are similar to those involved in Abstract 57104, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
October 2, 1946

No. 51339.

#### Protests 97663-K, etc., of F. W. Myers & Co., Inc.

Abstract 51266. Plaintiff’s application for rehearing granted.
115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 117 

AN ACT 

To designate a mountain peak in the State of Montana 

as ‘‘Alex Diekmann Peak’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 117 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Alex Diekmann Peak 

3 Designation Act of 2017’’. 

4 SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF ALEX DIEKMANN PEAK, MON5 TANA. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—The unnamed 9,765-foot peak lo7 cated 2.2 miles west-northwest of Finger Mountain on the 

8 western boundary of the Lee Metcalf Wilderness, Montana 

9 (UTM coordinates Zone 12, 457966 E., 4982589 N.), 

10 shall be known and designated as ‘‘Alex Diekmann Peak’’. 

11 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg12 ulation, document, record, or other paper of the United 

13 States to the peak described in subsection (a) shall be con14 sidered to be a reference to ‘‘Alex Diekmann Peak’’. 

Passed the Senate December 20, 2017. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 117 

AN ACT 

To designate a mountain peak in the State of 

Montana as ‘‘Alex Diekmann Peak’’.
# October
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellant,

v.

GREGORY LACERRA,

Appellee.

No. 4D21-399

[February 17, 2022]

Appeal from the County Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, 

Broward County; Jill K. Levy, Judge; L.T. Case Nos., 20-006001MM10A

(originally filed as 19-007000MM10A) and 20-000032AC10A.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Heidi L. Bettendorf, 

Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Eric T. Schwartzreich of Schwartzreich & Associates, Fort Lauderdale, 

and Sheila Zolnoor of the Law Office of Sheila Zolnoor, P.A., Fort 

Lauderdale, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

CONNER, C.J., FORST and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
No. 51331.

#### Protests 993177-G, etc., of Alexander & Baldwin, Ltd., et al. (Honolulu).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The protests were dismissed.
ADVANCED APPROPRIATIONS	  

EFFECTIVE FISCAL 2024

PREPARED BY:

GENERAL LEDGER AND ADVISORY BRANCH

FISCAL ACCOUNTING OPERATIONS

BUREAU OF THE FISCAL SERVICE

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Version Control

Background

An **advance appropriation** is an appropriation of new budget authority that becomes available one or more fiscal years beyond the fiscal year for which the appropriation act[footnoteRef:1] was passed.  An advance appropriation is justified when requests are needed to provide certainty to grantees for planning purposes (such as advance appropriations that are currently provided for the Corporation on Broadcasting) or by the need to provide full funding for capital acquisitions. Under the current Budget Enforcement Act scoring guidelines, new budget authority for advance appropriations is scored in the fiscal year in which the funds become available for obligation.[footnoteRef:2] [1:  A statute, under the jurisdiction of the House and Senate Committees on Appropriations, that generally provides legal authority for federal agencies to incur obligations and to make payments out of the Treasury for specified purposes.]  [2:  OMB Circular No. A-11, Section 20.3] 

As defined by the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 (31 U.S.C. 1105(a)(17)), advance appropriations are amounts provided in appropriation acts that become available for obligation one fiscal year or more beyond the fiscal year for which the legislation is enacted. Report the amount in the year in which it first becomes available for obligation.[footnoteRef:3] Advanced appropriations are only an appropriation act.1 They are not included the authorization act.  [3:  OMB Circular No. A-11, Section 20.4(c). ] 

*For example, an appropriation act for fiscal year 2022 providing for an advance in fiscal year 2024 indicates the following:  “For operating expenses, $1,500, is to become available on October 1, 2023.”*

###### Fiscal Year (FY) 2022 and FY 2023

No entry is recorded for the advance appropriation of $1,500. (annual)

Listing of USSGL Accounts Used in This Scenario 

###### FY 2024

Advanced Appropriations

Pre-Closing Trial Balance

Advanced Appropriations

Financial Statements

Closing Entries 

Post-Closing Trial Balance

2

# image1.png
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
Statements of Grant Prideco, Inc. and in the related Prospectus of our report
dated February 1, 2002, with respect to the consolidated financial statements
and schedule of Grant Prideco, Inc. included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K)
for the year ended December 31, 2001.

<Table>
<Caption>
FORM                  DESCRIPTION
----                  -----------
<S>         <C>
S-3         Registration of 631,579 shares of common stock issued to
            David R. Hall (No. 333-61732)

S-8         Grant Prideco, Inc. 401(K) Savings Plan (No. 333-38020)

S-8         Grant Prideco, Inc. 2000 Employee Stock Option and Restricted
            Stock Plan; Grant Prideco, Inc. 2000 Non-Employee Director Stock
            Option Plan; Grant Prideco, Inc. Executive Deferred Compensation
            Plan; Grant Prideco, Inc. Foreign Executive Deferred Compensation
            Plan; Grant Prideco, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan for
            Non-Employee Directors; Distribution Agreement between Grant
            Prideco, Inc. and Weatherford International, Inc. (No. 333-34746)
</Table>


                                          /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Houston, Texas
March 25, 2002
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-93,488-01

IN RE RYAN LEE SUMSTAD, Relator

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF MANDAMUS

CAUSE NO 14-03-02535 IN THE 359 DISTRICT COURT TH

FROM MONTGOMERY COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R

Relator has filed a motion for leave to file a writ of mandamus pursuant to the original

jurisdiction of this Court. In it, he contends that he has repeatedly written to the Montgomery

County District Clerk, attempting to purchase copies of trial transcripts, but the District Clerk has

not responded.

In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. Respondent, the District Clerk of

Montgomery County, is ordered to file a response stating whether he received a request from the

Relator for a statement of costs for his records. If the District Clerk received such a request, he shall

state the nature of his response and, if available, provide a copy of the response. If the District Clerk
2

received such a request and did not respond, he shall provide his rationale for not responding. This

application for leave to file a writ of mandamus shall be held in abeyance until Respondent has

submitted the appropriate response. Such response shall be submitted within 30 days of the date

of this order.

Filed: February 16, 2022

Do not publish
No. 57640.

#### Arnold, Hoffman & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 210853-K (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

An examination of the official papers disclosing nothing to disturb the decision of the collector, which was presumptively correct, the protest was overruled.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-7898

LARRY DARNELL SPEARS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus DIRECTOR OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. T. S. Ellis, III, District Judge. (1:04-cv-01198-TSE-LO) Submitted: January 3, 2007 Decided: January 12, 2007 Before MICHAEL and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Larry Darnell Spears, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Carson Vorhis, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Larry Darnell Spears seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his request to reopen for consideration his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683- 84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Spears has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Spears’ request for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# C_2017424EN.01003401.xml

| 11.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 424/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 424/34

---

Judgment of the General Court of 26 October 2017 — Alpirsbacher Klosterbräu Glauner v EUIPO (Klosterstoff)

(Case T-844/16) (1)

1

((European Union trade mark - Application for EU word mark Klosterstoff - Absolute grounds for refusal - Descriptiveness - Mark of such a nature as to deceive the public - Article 7(1)(b), (c) and (g) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(b), (c) and (g) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Prior practice of EUIPO))

(2017/C 424/49)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Alpirsbacher Klosterbräu Glauner GmbH & Co. KG (Alpirsbach, Germany) (represented by: W. Göpfert and S. Hofmann, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Schifko, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 October 2016 (Case R 2064/2015-5) concerning an application for registration of the word sign Klosterstoff as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Alpirsbacher Klosterbräu Glauner GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Alpirsbacher Klosterbräu Glauner GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 38,6.2.2017.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 218 (Tuesday, November 14, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 78052-78053]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-25072]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as

[[Page 78053]]

amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel; PAR-22-233: Time-Sensitive Opportunities for Health Research.
    Date: December 8, 2023.
    Time: 11:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Rockledge II, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Wenjuan Wang, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, 
Center for Scientific Review, National Institute of Health, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Room 3154, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 480-8667, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#5621373831216464163b373f3a78383f3e78313920"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9deafcf3faeaafafddf0fcf4f1b3f3f4f5b3faf2eb">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: November 8, 2023.
Patricia B. Hansberger,
Deputy Director, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-25072 Filed 11-13-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2015354EN.01004302.xml

| 26.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 354/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 354/43

---

Action brought on 2 September 2015 — Rafhaelo Gutti v OHIM — Transformados del Sur (CAMISERIA LA ESPAÑOLA)

(Case T-504/15)

(2015/C 354/53)

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Rafhaelo Gutti, SL (Loja, Spain) (represented by: I. L. Sempere Massa, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Transformados del Sur, SA (Seville, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Applicant for the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word elements ‘CAMISERIA LA ESPAÑOLA’ — Application for registration No 11 641 818

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before OHIM

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 2 July 2015 in Case R 2424/2014-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM in Case R 2424/2014-4, in turn annul Opposition B 2 226 655 and grant the application for Community trade mark 11 641 818 CAMISERIA LA ESPAÑOLA for goods in Class 25 which have been refused registration. |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM in Case R 2424/2014-4, in turn annul Opposition B 2 226 655 and grant the application for Community trade mark 11 641 818 CAMISERIA LA ESPAÑOLA for goods in Class 25 which have been refused registration.

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
##### 



EXHIBIT 99(b)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northland Cable Television,
Inc. and Subsidiary (the Company) on Form 10Q for the period ended
September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, Gary Jones, President of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;

| |                                                                                                                                                           
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 (a) or (15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m or 78(d)); and   
|
| | (2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Dated: November 12, 2002



| | BY: | /s/ GARY S. JONES                                                   
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     | Gary S. Jones
President
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Case 2:02-cv-04393-JS Document 27 Filed 03/15/2004 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:02-cv-04393-JS Document 27 Filed 03/15/2004 Page 2 of 2