alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 1 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 2 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 3 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 4 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 5 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 6 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 7 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 8 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 9 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 10 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 11 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 12 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 13 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 14 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 15 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 16 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 17 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 18 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 19 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 20 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 21 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 22 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 23 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 24 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 25 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 26 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 27 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 28 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 29 of 29
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 99-46

                          MONTHLY SERVICER CERTIFICATE



         Pursuant to Section 4.01(d)(ii) of the Securitization Property
Servicing Agreement, dated as of March 9, 2001 (the "Agreement"), between The
Detroit Edison Company, as servicer (the "Servicer") and The Detroit Edison
Securitization Funding LLC, the Servicer does hereby certify as follows:

         Capitalized terms used herein have their respective meanings as set
forth in the Agreement.

For the Monthly Period:  November 2003


<TABLE>
<S><C>
1.        BILLINGS:

a)       Monthly kWh Consumption:    4,217,333,849
                                     -------------
b)       Applicable SB Charge:           $ 0.00336
                                         ---------
c)       Total SB Charge Amount Invoiced this Month (Net of .5% uncollectible factor):    $ 14,096,662.75
                                                                                          ---------------
d)       Cumulative SB Charge Amount Invoiced this Remittance Period:                     $158,898,539.81
                                                                                          ---------------

2.        REMITTANCES:

a)       Weighted Average Days outstanding:                               48
                                                                          --
b)       Total Amount Remitted this Month:                   $ 15,578,607.32
                                                             ---------------
c)       Cumulative Amount Remitted this Remittance Period:  $160,975,006.86
                                                             ---------------

3.        BALANCES ON SUBACCOUNTS (AT END OF MONTHLY PERIOD):

a)       Collection Account Balance:                       $ 45,618,685.07
                                                           ---------------
b)       Reserve Subaccount Balance:                       $ 10,747,381.84
                                                           ---------------
c)       Series Overcollateralization Subaccount Balance:   $ 1,562,562.97
                                                            --------------
d)       Series Capital Subaccount Balance:                 $ 8,751,703.04
                                                            --------------
</TABLE>

Executed as of December 12, 2003.



                                        THE DETROIT EDISON COMPANY
                                        as Servicer



                                        By: /s/ Peter B. Oleksiak
                                            ------------------------------------
                                        Name:  Peter B. Oleksiak
                                        Title: Director and Assistant Controller
----

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant as of and for the periods presented in the Report. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/ Lynda J. Nahra                    |
|--------|---------------------------------------|
|   | Lynda J. Nahra                        |
|   | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |                                  |
|   | /s/ Charles G. Baltuskonis            |
|   | Charles G. Baltuskonis                |
|   | Executive Vice President and          |
|   | Chief Financial Officer               |

----
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 561 Filed 06/04/2009 Page 1 of 47
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 561 Filed 06/04/2009 Page 2 of 47
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 561 Filed 06/04/2009 Page 3 of 47
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 561 Filed 06/04/2009 Page 4 of 47
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 561 Filed 06/04/2009 Page 5 of 47
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 561 Filed 06/04/2009 Page 6 of 47
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 561 Filed 06/04/2009 Page 7 of 47
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 561 Filed 06/04/2009 Page 8 of 47
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 561 Filed 06/04/2009 Page 9 of 47
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 561 Filed 06/04/2009 Page 10 of 47
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 561 Filed 06/04/2009 Page 11 of 47
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 561 Filed 06/04/2009 Page 12 of 47
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 561 Filed 06/04/2009 Page 13 of 47
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 561 Filed 06/04/2009 Page 14 of 47
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 561 Filed 06/04/2009 Page 15 of 47
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 561 Filed 06/04/2009 Page 16 of 47
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 561 Filed 06/04/2009 Page 17 of 47
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 561 Filed 06/04/2009 Page 18 of 47
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 561 Filed 06/04/2009 Page 19 of 47
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 561 Filed 06/04/2009 Page 20 of 47
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 561 Filed 06/04/2009 Page 21 of 47
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 561 Filed 06/04/2009 Page 22 of 47
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 561 Filed 06/04/2009 Page 23 of 47
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 561 Filed 06/04/2009 Page 24 of 47
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 561 Filed 06/04/2009 Page 25 of 47
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 561 Filed 06/04/2009 Page 26 of 47
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 561 Filed 06/04/2009 Page 27 of 47
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 561 Filed 06/04/2009 Page 28 of 47
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 561 Filed 06/04/2009 Page 29 of 47
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 561 Filed 06/04/2009 Page 30 of 47
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 561 Filed 06/04/2009 Page 31 of 47
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 561 Filed 06/04/2009 Page 32 of 47
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 561 Filed 06/04/2009 Page 33 of 47
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 561 Filed 06/04/2009 Page 34 of 47
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 561 Filed 06/04/2009 Page 35 of 47
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 561 Filed 06/04/2009 Page 36 of 47
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 561 Filed 06/04/2009 Page 37 of 47
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 561 Filed 06/04/2009 Page 38 of 47
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 561 Filed 06/04/2009 Page 39 of 47
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 561 Filed 06/04/2009 Page 40 of 47
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 561 Filed 06/04/2009 Page 41 of 47
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 561 Filed 06/04/2009 Page 42 of 47
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 561 Filed 06/04/2009 Page 43 of 47
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 561 Filed 06/04/2009 Page 44 of 47
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 561 Filed 06/04/2009 Page 45 of 47
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 561 Filed 06/04/2009 Page 46 of 47
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 561 Filed 06/04/2009 Page 47 of 47
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 991 

Expressing support for the designation of National Public Safety Aviation 

Day. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JULY 12, 2018 

Mr. BILIRAKIS submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of National Public 

Safety Aviation Day. 

Whereas, for over 65 years, airplanes and helicopters have 

been an important part of public safety efforts in communities throughout the United States; 

Whereas professional public safety aircrews and pilots have 

flown millions of hours protecting persons and property, 

often under hazardous and dangerous conditions; 

Whereas public safety agencies have long recognized the value 

of utilizing airborne assets; 

Whereas professional public safety aircrews recognize the importance of aviation safety during their missions; and 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 991 IH 

Whereas July 26 would be an appropriate date to designate 

as National Public Safety Aviation Day: Now, therefore, 

be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the designation of National Public 

3 Safety Aviation Day; 

4 (2) recognizes the men and women who fly pub5 lic safety missions to protect people and property in 

6 the United States; and 

7 (3) encourages the President to issue a procla8 mation calling upon the people of the United States 

9 to observe National Public Safety Aviation Day with 

10 appropriate ceremonies and activities. 

Æ 


amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with BILLS
No. 63589.

protest 59/846 (New York).

#### The Danwill Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5(b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-13-0001285

29-FEB-2016

09:35 AM
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Robert Hardie Tibaut Bowman and Powers L. Bowman v. Molly 

Bowman Stephens

Appellate case number: 01-17-00522-CV

Trial court case number: D-1-GN-13-000636

Trial court: 261st District Court of Travis County

Appellee filed a response to appellant’s motion for emergency relief. 

The Court requests appellant to file a reply to appellee’s response by noon, Thursday, 

August 10, 2017.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Harvey Brown

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: August 7, 2017
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

AUDREY LYNN HUBLER : CIVIL ACTION

 :

v. :

 :

WIDENER UNIVERSITY : NO. 05-01785-JF

BRYAN UBER : CIVIL ACTION

 :

v. :

 :

WIDENER UNIVERSITY : NO. 05-01920-JF

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Fullam, Sr. J. June 13, 2005

The above-captioned cases arise from a common factual

nucleus, and will now be consolidated for all purposes. 

The defendant, Widener University, has filed a motion

to dismiss in each case. Contrary to defendant’s arguments, I

conclude that both complaints pass muster under the Fed. R. Civ.

P. 12(b)(6) standard. Ms. Hubler’s complaint adequately alleges

that, over an extended period, she was the victim of sexual

harassment at the hands of a fellow student, who was also the son

of a faculty member; and that the defendant’s reaction amounted

to studied neglect of the problem. Since the harassment extended

over a considerable period, and her complaints to the defendant

were not finally resolved until the summer of 2003, her complaint

filed in April 2005 was timely. There were no mandatory

Case 2:05-cv-01785-JF Document 5 Filed 06/13/05 Page 1 of 3
2

grievance procedures for her to follow, and, in any event, she

adequately complained to the University. 

Plaintiff Bryan Uber adequately alleges that he was

disciplined in retaliation for having complained about the

harassment of Ms. Hubler, and for assisting her in complaining to

the police about the conduct of the fellow student. His

complaint also sufficiently alleges a claim for violation of due

process. According to his complaint, he was summarily ordered

out of his dormitory and off the campus without a hearing of any

kind; he was later given 24 hours’ notice of the hearing, but was

simultaneously notified that, although he could present the

testimony of witnesses who were willing to testify, he could not

compel the attendance of any witness; and that, while he was

entitled to be represented by an advisor at the hearing, he would

be required to furnish the name of the advisor at least 24 hours

before the hearing (i.e., shortly before receipt of the notice).

The defendants’ motions to dismiss these complaints

will therefore be denied.

An Order follows.

Case 2:05-cv-01785-JF Document 5 Filed 06/13/05 Page 2 of 3
3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

AUDREY LYNN HUBLER : CIVIL ACTION

 :

v. :

 :

WIDENER UNIVERSITY : NO. 05-01785-JF

BRYAN UBER : CIVIL ACTION

 :

v. :

 :

WIDENER UNIVERSITY : NO. 05-01920-JF

ORDER

AND NOW, this 13th day of June 2005, IT IS ORDERED:

1. The above-captioned actions are CONSOLIDATED for

all purposes.

2. Defendants’ motions to dismiss the complaints in

each action are DENIED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ John P. Fullam 

John P. Fullam, Sr. J.

Case 2:05-cv-01785-JF Document 5 Filed 06/13/05 Page 3 of 3
Before the Second Division,

May 1, 1968

No. P68/231.

protests 63/23180, etc. (Los Angeles).

#### Asiatic Import Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of radio earphones similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Motorola, Inc., and International Expediters, Inc.*v. *United States*(54 Cust. Ct. 303, Abstract 69019), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
----

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 22 June 2006 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Cour d'appel de Poitiers, France) — Conseil général de la Vienne v Directeur général des douanes et droits indirects

(Case C-419/04) (1)

(Post-clearance recovery of import duties - Remission of import duties - Conditions - Article 871 of the regulation implementing the Community Customs Code - Scope of the obligation to submit the case to the Commission - Failure on the part of a person liable for payment acting in good faith to declare additional royalties which should have been incorporated in the customs value of imported goods)

(2006/C 190/05)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Cour d'appel de Poitiers

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Conseil général de la Vienne

Respondent: Directeur général des douanes et droits indirects

Re:

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Cour d'Appel de Poitiers (Court of Appeal, Poitiers, France) — Interpretation of Article 871 of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code (OJ 1993 L 253, p. 1) — Recovery of the amount of the customs debt — Obligatory nature of reference to the Commission in the event of doubt as to the scope of the criteria relating to the recovery or the remission of duties resulting from a customs debt

Operative part of the judgment

Article 871 of Commission Regulation (EEC) No 2454/93 of 2 July 1993 laying down provisions for the implementation of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code, as amended by Commission Regulation (EC) No 1677/98 of 29 July 1998, must be interpreted as meaning that, in the context of a recovery procedure or a procedure for remission of uncollected customs duties, the national customs authorities are not required to submit the case to the Commission for a decision where the doubts which they had had as regards the precise scope of the criteria laid down in Article 220(2)(b) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code with regard to a particular case have disappeared, even after those authorities have expressed their intention to refer the matter to the Commission, or where the doubts relate to the subsequent entry in the accounts of customs duties which were not collected due to an omission on the part of an importer acting in good faith to declare royalties which should have been incorporated in the customs value of the imported goods.

----

(1)OJ C 284, 20.11.2004.

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                      9
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000                          
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              Sep-30-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 Oct-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                                   Mar-31-1998
<CASH>                                         2,874
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         118,431
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                               0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    12,925
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         15,257
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           15,066
<LOANS>                                        136,196
<ALLOWANCE>                                    1,261
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 291,265
<DEPOSITS>                                     263,588
<SHORT-TERM>                                   1,500
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            2,250
<LONG-TERM>                                    2,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     21,927
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 291,265
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                5,474
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              904
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               309
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               6,687
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                             3,467
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             3,574
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          3,113
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  150
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                             185
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                2,141
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,257
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   806
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                 3.4
<LOANS-NON>                                    694
<LOANS-PAST>                                   0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                               247
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                456
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               1,110
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  3
<RECOVERIES>                                   4
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              1,261
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           1,261
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                            0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                        0
        

</TABLE>
No. 53475.

protest 49333-K (Pittsburgh).

#### Joseph Horne Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.
1

Fellner, Christian

From: Higgins, Cortney <Cortney_Higgins@omb.eop.gov>

Sent: Saturday, May 31, 2014 12:45 PM

To: Adams, Darryl; Wayland, Robertj

Cc: Laity, Jim; Curry, Bridgid; Mancini, Dominic J.

Subject: Re: Modified & Reconstructed Sources OMB ROCIS File for 2060-AR88

Hi Darryl and Bob,  

We have concluded review if this rule.  

Regards,  

Cortney  

 

From: Higgins, Cortney 

Sent: Friday, May 30, 2014 09:59 PM Eastern Standard Time 

To: Adams, Darryl <Adams.Darryl@epa.gov> 

Subject: RE: Modified & Reconstructed Sources OMB ROCIS File for 2060-AR88 

 

Thanks!

From: Adams, Darryl [mailto:Adams.Darryl@epa.gov] 

Sent: Friday, May 30, 2014 9:44 PM 

To: Higgins, Cortney 

Cc: Owens, Nicole; Curry, Bridgid; Eck, Janet; Culligan, Kevin; Kime, Robin; Stewart, Lori 

Subject: Modified & Reconstructed Sources OMB ROCIS File for 2060-AR88 

Cortney,

I've attached the official version for upload to ROCIS on Monday morning.  This version has the updated

header at the top (only difference from the file you just sent EPA).  

Darryl Adams

Regulatory Management Division

Office of Policy, U.S. EPA

202 564‐6569

Mail Code 1806A, Room 6440U WJC North
**Exhibit 23.1**
**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-72888)pertaining to the Odyssey HealthCare, Inc. Stock Option Plan, the Odyssey HealthCare, Inc. 2001Equity-Based Compensation Plan and the Odyssey HealthCare, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan of ourreports dated March 11, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of OdysseyHealthCare, Inc., Odyssey HealthCare, Inc. management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financialreporting of Odyssey HealthCare, Inc., included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the yearended December 31, 2004.
/s/Ernst & Young LLP
Dallas, Texas
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ROBERT LINDSAY : CIVIL ACTION

 [CJ-2601] :

:

 v. :

 :

DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, et al. : NO. 05-712

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of , 2005, 

upon consideration of the pleadings and the record herein, and after review of the Report and

Recommendation of M. Faith Angell, Chief United States Magistrate Judge, it is hereby

ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED AND ADOPTED.

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED AND DISMISSED 

AS TIME BARRED under 28 U.S.C. §2244(d)(1).

There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability.

BY THE COURT:

 

 MICHAEL M. BAYLSON, J.

Case 2:05-cv-00712-MMB Document 7 Filed 10/24/05 Page 1 of 1
No. 62500.

#### S. Berger Co. and Keff Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 330462-K and 330533-K (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of iron pictures the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Marshall Field & Co.*v. *United States*(45 C. C. P. A. 72, C. A. D. 676), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.