alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Before the First Division,

January 24, 1951

No. 55166.

#### Hugo Melchior *v.*United States,

petition 6752-R (Chicago).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

The petitioner was solicited by a Swiss exporter to buy certain cigarette lighters at a price of 90 cents each. When the lighters arrived, the petitioner made entry at the invoice value of 90 cents each, but was advised by the customs authorities that because of the fact that certain patent rights were involved, the merchandise could not be released to him. Although the administrative determination with respect to the release of the lighters was in favor of the petitioner, it caused a change in the basis of value which resulted in the assessment of increased duties. The customs authorities explained the reasons for the difference in value, but the petitioner apparently became confused and instead *344of amending his entry and paying the increased duties, waited for the appearance of a bill calling for their payment. After allowing a reasonable time within which the petitioner might amend his entry, the customs oíBeers returned a higher value for the merchandise than that shown on entry. Prom an examination of the record the court held that there was no intent to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the case or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore granted.
Exhibit 24

                        POWER OF ATTORNEY

                 INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY
      ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 1O-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED
      __________________DECEMBER_31,_1995_________________


     The undersigned directors of INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY,
an Indiana corporation (the "Company"), do hereby constitute and
appoint E. LINN DRAPER, JR., G. P. MALONEY and P. J. DeMARIA, and
each of them, their attorneys-in-fact and agents, to execute for
them, and in their names, and in any and all of their capacities,
the Annual Report of the Company on Form lO-K, pursuant to Section
13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 1995, and any and all amendments thereto, and to
file the same, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in
connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them,
full power and authority to do and perform every act and thing
required or necessary to be done, as fully to all intents and
purposes as the undersigned might or could do in person, hereby
ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and
agents, or any of them, may lawfully do or cause to be done by
virtue hereof.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have signed these presents
this 28th day of February, 1996.


_/s/_C._R._Boyle,_III_________     _/s/_James_J._Markowsky_______
C. R. Boyle, III                   James J. Markowsky

_/s/_G._A._Clark______________     _/s/_A._H._Potter_____________
G. A. Clark                        A. H. Potter

_/s/_P._J._DeMaria____________     _/s/_D._B._Synowiec___________
P. J. DeMaria                      D. B. Synowiec

_/s/_W._N._D'Onofrio__________     _/s/_D._M._Trenary____________
W. N. D'Onofrio                    D. M. Trenary

_/s/_E._Linn_Draper,_Jr.______     _/s/_J._H._Vipperman__________
E. Linn Draper, Jr.                J. H. Vipperman

_/s/_Wm._J._Lhota_____________     _/s/_W._E._Walters____________
Wm. J. Lhota                       W. E. Walters

_/s/_G._P._Maloney____________
G. P. Maloney

[ANNUAL\103.96C]<PAGE>
6/3/2014

PEI Calculator Updates from v11 to v12

The following are updates that DOE is considering implementing in the PEI calculator in the new version 

12. To help control the number of versions, please suggest any other updates that are desired at this 

time and, hopefully, all the updates can be implemented at once. Both substantive and editorial 

changes are listed below:

Substantive: 

1. Update minimally compliant motor efficiency tables from 10 CFR 431.25 to reflect newly 

published DOE motor standards

2. Add minimum efficiency table for submersible motors

3. Update C-Values based on aggregated HI and DOE data

4. Update C-Values to reflect more PEI levels between PEI10 and PEI40

a. suggest 10, 15, 20, 25, 30, 35, and 40

5. Implement tabs to enter tested wire-to-water input power data and calculate PEI

6. Implement new motor loss curve equation (slightly different coefficients based on conservative 

assumption)

Editorial

1. Change nomenclature to PEI for Index and PER for numerator or denominator value (consistent 

with Nomenclature B option presented at the May 28-29 RegNeg meeting)

2. Increase number of rows on each tab to a higher number (2000?)

Please suggest other edits that are necessary or desired by June 11th.
**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
      SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Report of ProtoKinetix, Inc., a Nevada corporation, (the
      “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dr.
      John Todd, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify the
      following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:





1.
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





2.
            The
                information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company.











*/s/
      Dr. John Todd*


Dr.
      John
      Todd


Chief
      Executive Officer President and Chief Financial Officer





April
      17,
      2007
No. 63026.

#### Cathay Crafts Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 58/12826 (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of iron pictures the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Marshall Field & Co.*v. *United States*(45 C.C.P.A. 72, C.A.D. 676), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# C_2017144EN.01004602.xml

| 8.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 144/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 144/46

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 10 March 2017 — Przedsiębiorstwo Energetyki Cieplnej v ECHA

(Case T-625/16 R)

((Interim measures - European Chemicals Agency - REACH - Fee payable for registration of a substance - Reduction granted to micro, small and medium-sized enterprises - Decision imposing an administrative charge and an additional fee - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency))

(2017/C 144/64)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Przedsiębiorstwo Energetyki Cieplnej sp. z o.o. (Grajewo, Poland) (represented by: T. Dobrzyński, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Chemicals Agency (ECHA) (represented by: E. Maurage, J. Trnka and M. Heikkilä, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application on the basis of Articles 278 TFEU and 279 TFEU seeking the granting of interim measures (i) suspending implementation of Decision No SME (2016) 2851 of 23 June 2016 which found that the applicant was not entitled to the fee reductions applicable to medium-sized enterprises and (ii) ordering the defendant to cancel the invoices issued on the basis of that decision, namely ECHA invoices No 10058238 and No 10058239 of 23 June 2016.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
# C_2017038EN.01001102.xml

| 6.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/11

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landesverwaltungsgericht Oberösterreich (Austria) lodged on 21 November 2016 — Mario Alexander Filippi and Others

(Case C-589/16)

(2017/C 038/15)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Landesverwaltungsgericht Oberösterreich

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Mario Alexander Filippi, Martin Manigatterer, Play For Me GmbH, ATG GmbH, Christian Vöcklinger, Gmalieva s.r.o., PBW GmbH, Felicitas GmbH, Celik KG, Christian Guzy, Martin Klein, Shopping Center Wels Einkaufszentrum GmbH, Game Zone Entertainment AG, Fortuna Advisory Kft., Finanzamt Linz, Klara Matyiko

Applicants:

Defendants: Landespolizeidirektion Oberösterreich, Bezirkshauptmann Eferding, Bezirkshauptmann Ried im Innkreis, Bezirkshauptmann Linz-Land

Defendants:

Question referred

Question referred

Is Article 47 of the Charter (1) in conjunction with Article 56 et seq. TFEU to be interpreted as meaning that, in cases in which it is necessary to make an assessment of consistency, national provisions (such as Paragraph 86a(4) of the Verfassungsgerichtshofgesetz (VfGG), Paragraph 38a(4) of the Verwaltungsgerichtsgesetz (VwGG), Paragraph 87(2) of the VfGG or Paragraph 63(1) of the VwGG) are incompatible with those provisions of EU law where — as part of an overall system which in practice has the effect that supreme courts do not carry out any autonomous assessment of the facts or weighing of evidence, and in numerous cases which are in the same position in terms of the question of law raised make only a single decision on the facts in one of those cases and on that basis dismiss all the other appeals in limine — they permit, or do not reliably exclude, that judicial (within the meaning of Article 6(1) of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) or Article 47 of the Charter) decisions — in particular those made in relation to core areas of EU law, such as for example access to markets or free trade — can then be precluded by decisions of institutions of higher instance which for their part do not comply with the requirements of Article 6(1) of the ECHR or Article 47 of the Charter, without a prior reference to the Court of Justice for a preliminary ruling?

1

---

(1)  Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.

1

---
2150063v1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. 

ASBESTOS PERSONAL INJURY 

SETTLEMENT TRUST, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE 

COMPANY, 

 Defendant. 

Civil Action No. 02-4360 

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

TO THE CLERK OF COURT:

 Kindly enter the appearance of Carmon M. Harvey, Esquire of Montgomery, 

McCracken, Walker & Rhoads, LLP as counsel on behalf of Plaintiff Armstrong World 

Industries, Inc. Asbestos Personal Injury Settlement Trust. 

 

Dated: May 2, 2007 /s/ Carmon M. Harvey 

 Carmon M. Harvey (Pa. I.D. No. 91444) 

 Montgomery, McCracken, 

 Walker & Rhoads, LLP 

 123 South Broad Street 

 Philadelphia, PA 19109 

 (215) 772-1500 

Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 47 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 1 of 2
2150063v1

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I, Carmon M. Harvey, hereby certify that on this 2nd day of May, 2007, I caused a true 

and correct copy of the foregoing Entry of Appearance to be served by first-class United States 

mail on the following: 

Edward F. Mannino, Esquire 

Jason A. Snyderman, Esquire 

Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, L.L.P. 

One Commerce Square, Suite 2200 

2005 Market Street 

Philadelphia, PA 19103-7086 

A. Hugh Scott, Esquire 

Kathleen Burdette Shields, Esquire 

Choate, Hall & Stewart 

53 State Street 

Boston, MA 02109 

Attorneys for Defendant 

 This document has been filed electronically and is available for viewing and downloading 

from the ECF system. 

 /s/ Carmon M. Harvey 

 Carmon M. Harvey 

Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 47 Filed 05/02/2007 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 10.32 [Letterhead of John T.
    Dickson]
    President & CEO








December 22, 2003

Ms. Rae F. Sedel
  Managing Director
  Russell Reynolds Associates Limited
  24 James Square
  London SW1Y 4HZ

Subject: Kevin Pennington
   Capital Loss Agreement

Dear Rae,

In confirmation of our conversation
  in London on December 16th, I propose that we extend the agreement (attached)
  covering Kevins investment in his Lehigh Valley property through to December
  27, 2007. If you agree, would you please initial this memo and the attachment
  and return it to me.

Thank you.

/s/ John T. Dickson

John T. Dickson

Att.

Copy to:
  Jean Rankin
  Hap Wagner

|                   |  |     
|------------------ |  | ----
|Rae
      F. Sedel |  | Date

---

[Letterhead
  of John T. Dickson]
  President & CEO





July 27, 2001



Dear Kevin:

This letter will modify
  your employment agreement dated December 27, 2000 (the Letter).
  Terms used herein and not defined have the meanings ascribed to them in the
  Letter.

Agere Systems Inc. (Agere)
  agrees that if, prior to December 27, 2003, your employment with Agere is terminated
  for any reason other than cause, and if you have not entered into
  a contract for the sale of your house for a contracted sale price at least equal
  to the minimum price within three months after any such termination,
  and provided that you have used your best efforts to sell your house for at
  least the minimum price, Agere will, at its option, either (i) purchase the
  house from you at the minimum price or (ii) reimburse you for any difference
  between the minimum price and actual price at which you contract for the sale
  of
  your house. For purposes of this Letter, the minimum price is
  your initial purchase price and up to $350,000 of additional documented capital
  improvements.

If you agree, please indicate
  by signing the enclosed copy of this letter.

|/s/ John T.
      Dickson     |  |                                                      
|----------------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|                              |  |                                                      
|John T. Dickson               |  |                                                      
|                              |  | 12/21/03 Proposed
      to
      Extend to 12/27/2007
|                              |  |                                                      
|Accepted and
      Agreed:    |  | /s/ John T.
      Dickson                            
|                              |  |                                                      
|/s/ Kevin P.
      Pennington |  | Agreed/Declined
      ----------                     
|Kevin P. Pennington           |  | Rae Sedel                                            
|                              |  |                                                      

---
No. 55191.

#### Fleming-Joffe, Ltd., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 133655-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of reptile skins the same in all material respects as those passed upon in *Fleming-Joffe, Ltd.*v. *United States*(25 Cust. Ct. 56, C. D. 1263), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1765 was sustained.
No. 51938.

#### David S. Stern Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 102152-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
# C_2019230EN.01002602.xml

| 8.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 230/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 230/26

---

Judgment of the General Court of 8 May 2019 — Enrico Colombo and Corinti Giacomo v Commission

(Case T-690/16) (1)

(Public works contracts - Tendering procedure - JRC in Ispra - Works for the construction and maintenance of water pipes and district heating/cooling substations - Rejection of a tenderer’s bid - Action for annulment - Action for damages - Obligation to state reasons)

(2019/C 230/32)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicants: Enrico Colombo (Sesto Calende, Italy) and Corinti Giacomo (Ispra, Italy) (represented by: R. Colombo and G. Turri, lawyers)

Defendant: Commission (represented by: initially, S. Delaude, L. Di Paolo and P. Rosa Plaza, then S. Delaude and L. Di Paolo and, lastly, S. Delaude and A. Spina, Agents)

Re:

First, application on the basis of Article 263 TFEU and seeking, in essence, annulment of the Commission’s decisions rejecting the tender submitted by the applicants in connection with the tendering procedure JRC/IPR/2016/C4/0002/OC, concerning a Framework agreement for the construction and maintenance of water pipes and heating/cooling substations at the Joint Research Centre (JRC) in Ispra (Italy) and awarding that contract to another tenderer and, secondly, application on the basis of Article 268 TFEU and seeking compensation in respect of the harm allegedly suffered by the applicants as a result of those decisions.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Enrico Colombo SpA and Corinti Giacomo to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Enrico Colombo SpA and Corinti Giacomo to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 22, 23.1.2017.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1107 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1107

   To amend title II of the Social Security Act to waive the waiting 
 period otherwise required for disability beneficiaries in the case of 
 individuals suffering from terminal illnesses with not more than six 
                            months to live.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 11, 1999

 Mr. Watkins introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Ways and Means

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title II of the Social Security Act to waive the waiting 
 period otherwise required for disability beneficiaries in the case of 
 individuals suffering from terminal illnesses with not more than six 
                            months to live.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Terminal Disability Fairness and 
Equity Act of 1999''.

SEC. 2. WAITING PERIOD FOR SOCIAL SECURITY DISABILITY BENEFICIARIES 
              INAPPLICABLE TO INDIVIDUALS WITH TERMINAL ILLNESSES.

    (a) In General.--Section 223(a)(1) of the Social Security Act (42 
U.S.C. 423(a)(1)) is amended, in clause (ii) of the first sentence--
            (1) by inserting ``(I)'' after ``but only if'', and
            (2) by inserting ``or (II) he has a terminal illness (as 
        defined in subsection (j)),'' after ``under such disability,''.
    (b) Terminal Illness Defined.--Section 223 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 
423) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:

                    ``Definition of Terminal Illness

    ``(j) As used in this section, the term `terminal illness' means, 
in the case of any individual, a medically determinable physical 
impairment which is expected to result in the death of such individual 
within the next six months.''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply with respect to benefits for which applications are filed on or 
after the date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of IQ Biometrix, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael Walsh,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                                /s/ Michael Walsh
                                -----------------------------
                                Michael Walsh
                                Chief Financial Officer



May 16, 2005
No. 64056.

protests 945376-G, etc. (New York).

#### Carl H. Schultz Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Searched for **https://www.ssa.gov/pubs/EN-05-10076.pdf**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **https://www.ssa.gov/pubs/EN-05-10076.pdf**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.