alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-3 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 1 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-3 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 2 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-3 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 3 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-3 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 4 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-3 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 5 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-3 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 6 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-3 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 7 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-3 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 8 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-3 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 9 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-3 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 10 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-3 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 11 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-3 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 12 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-3 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 13 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-3 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 14 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-3 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 15 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-3 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 16 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-3 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 17 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-3 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 18 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-3 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 19 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-3 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 20 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-3 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 21 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-3 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 22 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-3 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 23 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-3 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 24 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-3 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 25 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-3 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 26 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-3 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 27 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-3 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 28 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-3 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 29 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-3 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 30 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-3 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 31 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-3 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 32 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-3 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 33 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-3 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 34 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-3 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 35 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-3 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 36 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-3 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 37 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-3 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 38 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-3 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 39 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-3 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 40 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-3 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 41 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-3 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 42 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-3 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 43 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-3 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 44 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-3 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 45 of 46
Case 2:02-cv-20134-HB Document 6-3 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 46 of 46
Before the First Division,

May 14, 1962

No. 66756.

#### Allied Display Materials, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 61/11685 (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of strings of beads similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *S. H. Kress & Co.*(46 C.C.P.A. 135, C.A.D. 716), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 60000.

#### S. J. Charia & Co. *v.*United States,

protest 258963-K/14298 (New Orleans).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silk scarves or squares similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *The Specialty House, Inc. Bryant & Heffernan, Inc., et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 136, C. A. D. 585), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

KIRITKUMAR DESAI : CIVIL ACTION 

Petitioner, :

:

v. :

:

PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF :

PROBATION AND PAROLE, et al. :

Respondents. : No. 05-1811

O R D E R

.

AND NOW, this day of November 2005, upon careful and independent

consideration of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus, and after review of the Report and

Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge David R. Strawbridge, it is ORDERED

that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

2. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus (Doc. No. 1) is DENIED with

prejudice;

3. A certificate of appealability SHALL NOT issue because we do not believe

Petitioner has made “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); and

4. The Clerk of the Court shall mark this case CLOSED for statistical purposes.

BY THE COURT:

___________________________ 

MARY A. MCLAUGHLIN, J.

Case 2:05-cv-01811-MAM Document 11 Filed 11/30/05 Page 1 of 1
No. 55849.

protest 66119-K (New (York).

#### I. Magnin & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

RAO, J.

Theiprotest was dismissed.
Exhibit 13.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C.


SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of IRSA
Propiedades Comerciales S.A. (the “Company”) for
the fiscal year ended June 30, 2020 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), Matias Gaivironsky, as Chief Financial and
Administrative Officer of the company, hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;





(1)
The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15
(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.





IRSA Propiedades Comerciales S.A.October
26, 2020.
By:
/s/ Matias
GaivironskyMatias
GaivironskyChief
Financial and Administrative Officer





This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except as to the
extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed
by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

July 13, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-60219

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

RODERICK STUTTS,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 3:04-CR-78-1

--------------------

Before SMITH, GARZA and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Roderick Stutts was convicted by a jury on four counts of

possession with intent to distribute cocaine base, and he was

sentenced to 121 months of imprisonment on each count to run

concurrently and five years of supervised release. Stutts argues

that the Government failed to authenticate or establish the chain

of custody for the cocaine. Stutts contends that the prosecution

introduced no evidence from Clarence Ward that the drugs

introduced into evidence were in fact purchased from him. Ward

testified that each time he purchased crack cocaine from Stutts,
No. 05-60219

-2-

he immediately turned over the drugs to a task force agent, and

his testimony was corroborated by the agents. Stutts has not

shown that the jury could not have decided that the evidence was

what the Government claimed it to be. See United States v.

Casto, 889 F.2d 562, 568-69 (5th Cir. 1989). Stutts has not

demonstrated that the district court abused it discretion in

admitting the drug exhibits. See United States v. Polasek, 162

F.3d 878, 883 (5th Cir. 1998).

Stutts argues that the evidence was insufficient to support

the verdict because the only evidence of his guilt came from

Ward, “a paid informant, whose testimony was so inherently

unreliable, unreasonable and improbable that no reasonable juror

should have credited it.” Stutts’ argument is based on the

alleged lack of credibility of Ward. This court’s review for

sufficiency of the evidence is not concerned with the credibility

of witnesses or the weight of the evidence, which is the

exclusive province of the jury. United States v. Garcia, 995

F.2d 556, 561 (5th Cir. 1993). As the Government points out, the

jury was made aware of Ward’s prior convictions, the current

charges pending against him, and the fact that he was a paid

informant, all factors that bore on his credibility. The jury

chose to believe Ward, and this court does not reweigh such a

decision. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Before the First Division,

April 29, 1968

No. P68/225.

protests 65/19616, etc. (Los Angeles).

#### Kwan Yuen Co. *v.*United States,

Watson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A.” covered by the foregoing protests *1038oonsist of rattancore sleighs and sleds similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Imported Merchandise Company*v. *United States*(56 Cust. Ct. 554, C.D. 2702); that the items marked “B” consist of rattancore coolie hat planters, sleighs, modern shaped trays, snack trays, and 'hanging planters similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Royal Cathay Trading Co.*and *W. J. Byrnes & Co. et al. v. United States*(56 Cust. Ct. 371, C.D. 2662); that the items marked “C” consist of rattancore and reed Kleenex tissue box covers similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Quon Quon Company v. United States*(41 Cust. Ct. 178, C.D. 2038); and that the items marked “F” consist of rattancore suitcases and valises similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Royal Cathay Trading Co.*and *W. J. Byrnes & Co.*v. *United States*(45 Cust. Ct. 99, C.D. 2206); the claims of the plaintiff were sustained.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

TOLEDO MACK SALES & :

SERVICE, INC., : CIVIL ACTION

:

Plaintiff, : NO. 02-4373

:

v. :

:

MACK TRUCKS, INC., :

:

Defendant. :

______________________________________________________________________________

MACK TRUCKS, INC., :

:

Counterclaim Plaintiff, :

:

v. :

:

TOLEDO MACK SALES & :

SERVICE, INC., :

:

Counterclaim Defendant. :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 17th day of July, 2006, in accordance with Plaintiff Toledo Mack Sales

& Service, Inc.’s letter dated June 6, 2006, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff Toledo Mack

Sales & Service, Inc.’s Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 75) is deemed

WITHDRAWN. 

BY THE COURT:

 s/ Ronald L. Buckwalter, S. J. 

RONALD L. BUCKWALTER, S.J.

Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 84 Filed 07/18/2006 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1438 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1438

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
 To redesignate the Jefferson National Expansion Memorial in the State 
           of Missouri as the ``Gateway Arch National Park''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Gateway Arch National Park 
Designation Act''.

SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF GATEWAY ARCH NATIONAL PARK.

    (a) Redesignation.--The Jefferson National Expansion Memorial 
established under the Act of May 17, 1954 (16 U.S.C. 450jj et seq.), 
shall be known and designated as the ``Gateway Arch National Park''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the Jefferson National 
Expansion Memorial shall be considered to be a reference to the 
``Gateway Arch National Park''.

            Passed the Senate December 21, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
115th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1438

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 To redesignate the Jefferson National Expansion Memorial in the State 
           of Missouri as the ``Gateway Arch National Park''.
```
Before the First Division,

March 25, 1954

No, 57940.

protests 197209-K, etc. (New York).

#### American Thermo-Ware Company *v.*United States,

*434Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise and issues are the same in all material respects as those the subject of *John P. Herber & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(30 Cust. Ct. 193, C. D. 1519). In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the cited case, the protests were dismissed, and the matters were remanded to a single judge sitting in reappraisement for determination of the value of the merchandise in the manner provided by law (28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d)).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ROBERT S. CHEATLE, JR., et al. :

: CIVIL ACTION

v. :

:

DAVID A. KATZ, et al. : NO. 02-4405

ORDER

AND NOW, this 8th day of April, 2004, upon request of defendant, it is

ORDERED

that the NON-JURY TRIAL in the above-captioned matter is rescheduled to April 26, 2004 at 2:00

p.m., before the undersigned in Courtroom 3-I, Third Floor, U.S. Courthouse, 601 Market Street,

Philadelphia, Pa.

BY THE COURT:

 

THOMAS J. RUETER

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

cc: John C. Fenningham, Esquire

Francis Recchuiti, Esquire

(Via Fax)

Case 2:02-cv-04405-HH Document 26 Filed 04/08/2004 Page 1 of 1
85 NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 5. Inventories and Related Property, Net

Inventories and Related Property, Net as of September 30, 2018, and 2017

Reclass

(In billions of dollars) 2018 2017

Inventory purchased for resale ............................................................................... 68.0 61.8

Inventory and operating material and supplies held for repair .................................... 71.1 67.1

Inventory—excess, obsolete, and unserviceable ..................................................... 0.8 0.9

Operating materials and supplies held for use ......................................................... 124.7 143.8

Operating materials and supplies held in reserve for future use ................................ 13.8 0.2

Operating materials and supplies-excess, obsolete, and unserviceable ..................... 2.9 2.5

Stockpile materials held in reserve for future use...................................................... 51.9 49.3

Stockpile materials held for sale ............................................................................. 4.6 5.1

Other related property ............................................................................................ 8.6 3.8

Allowance for loss ................................................................................................. (8.9) (7.8)

Total inventories and related property, net.............................................................. 337.5 326.7

Beginning in fiscal year 2018, all entities are now reported together in each line item total for Inventories and Related 

Property, Net. DOD comprises approximately 81.7 percent of the government’s inventories and related property, net, as of 

September 30, 2018. DOD continues to implement SFFAS No. 48 which permits alternative methods in establishing opening 

balances for inventories and related property.

The following entities comprise over 98 percent of the government’s reported inventories and related property, net of 

$337.5 billion as of September 30, 2018. Refer to each entities’ financial statements for details.

x DOD

x DOE

x HHS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MICHAEL REIS, SR. and )

LAWRENCE J. KATZ, on Their Own ) Civil Action

Behalf and as Assignees of ) No. 05-CV-01651

Weaver Nut Company, Inc., )

 )

Plaintiffs )

 )

vs. )

 )

BARLEY, SNYDER, SENFT )

& COHEN LLC., )

 )

Defendant )

O R D E R

NOW, this 27th day of March, 2008, upon consideration

of the Motion of Defendant, Barley Snyder, LLC, to Strike

Plaintiffs’ Demand for a Jury Trial, which motion was filed 

July 13, 2007; upon consideration of Plaintiffs’ Opposition to

Defendant’s Motion to Strike Plaintiffs’ Jury Demand and

Countermotion Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 39,

which opposition and countermotion were filed July 30, 2007; upon

consideration of the Memorandum of Law of Defendant in Opposition

to Plaintiffs’ Motion Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 39, and in Further

Support of its Motion to Strike Plaintiffs’ Jury Demand, which

memorandum was filed August 9, 2007; and for the reasons

expressed in the accompanying Memorandum, 

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion of Defendant, Barley

Snyder, LLC, to Strike Plaintiffs’ Demand for a Jury Trial is

granted.

Case 2:05-cv-01651-JKG Document 69 Filed 03/27/08 Page 1 of 2
-iiIT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs’ Countermotion

Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 39 is denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the plaintiffs’ Demand for

Jury Trial filed June 29, 2007 is stricken.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ JAMES KNOLL GARDNER 

James Knoll Gardner

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cv-01651-JKG Document 69 Filed 03/27/08 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-134911, 333-149170, and 333-150368) and Form S-8 (No. 333-106311, 333-150356, 333-151916) of our report dated February 27, 2009, except
for Note B which is dated March 16, 2010, with respect to the consolidated balance sheet of GMX Resources Inc. and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008 and the related consolidated statement of operations, changes in equity, comprehensive
income (loss) and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2008, which report appears in the December 31, 2009, Annual Report (Form 10-K) of GMX Resources Inc. and Subsidiaries.



|                             
|-----------------------------
|/s/ Smith, Carney & Co., p.c.

Oklahoma City, OK

March 16, 2010
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Kenneth A. Shewer, Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Managing Owner, Preferred Investment Solutions
Corp. (the Managing Owner), of World Monitor Trust  Series B (Series B), hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | Series Bs Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Quarterly
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Series B.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                            
|/s/ Kenneth A. Shewer                                       
|Kenneth A. Shewer Co-Chief Executive
Officer August 14, 2006
No. 56981.

#### J. M. McCauley & Son *v.*United States,

protest 181387-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

An examination of the record showed that the protest was filed more than 60 days after the dates of liquidation of the two entries involved. The motion to dismiss was therefore granted.
# C_2017195EN.01002801.xml

| 19.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 195/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 195/28

---

Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2017 — HN v Commission

(Case T-588/16) (1)

1

((Civil Service - Officials - Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1023/2013 - Reform of the Staff Regulations - New career rules and rules for promotion to grades AD 13 and AD 14 - Officials of grade AD 12 - Exercise of particular responsibilities - Article 30(3) of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations - Promotion year 2014 - Request to be categorised in the type of post ‘Adviser or equivalent’ - Lack of response from the Appointing Authority - Promotion year 2015 - Fresh request to be categorised in the type of post ‘Adviser or equivalent’ or ‘Head of unit or equivalent’ - Rejected by the Appointing Authority - Confirmatory nature of the refusal of categorisation in the type of post ‘Adviser or equivalent’ - Requirements related to the pre-litigation procedure - Inadmissibility))

(2017/C 195/39)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: HN (represented by: F. Sciaudone and R. Sciaudone, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: E. Ehrbar and A-C. Simon, acting as Agents, and B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application on the basis of Article 270 TFEU seeking in particular the annulment of ‘the decision rejecting the [applicant’s] request to be regarded as exercising particular responsibilities giving rise to his categorisation in the type of post [of] “Adviser or equivalent” under Article 30(3) of Annex XIII of the [new] Staff Regulations’ and Decision SEC(2013) 691 of 18 December 2013, entitled “Communication to the Commission amending the Rules governing the composition of the Members” Cabinets and the Spokespersons’.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr HN to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr HN to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 251, 11.7.2016 (case initially registered before the European Union Civil Service Tribunal under number F-18/16 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1.9.2016)..

1

---