alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(Reap. Dec. 10353)

Entry No. 5796, etc.

#### Commercial Adolfo S. Pagan, Inc., et al. *v.*United States

(Decided October 17, 1962)

*Fieras & Martin ( Jaime Fieras, Jr.,*of counsel) for the plaintiffs.

*Joseph*D. *Guilfoyle,*Acting Assistant Attorney General *(Sheila N. Ziff,*trial attorney), for the defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

The appeals for a reappraisement enumerated in the schedule, attached to and made a part of this decision, which were consolidated for trial, involve the proper value for dutiable purposes of certain sanitary porcelainware.

When these cases were called for hearing, counsel for the adversary parties entered into an oral stipulation of fact, wherein it was agreed that the merchandise consists of vitreous china lavatories, water-closet bowls, tanks, and tank covers, which were entered at the invoice unit values and were appraised at unit values in United States currency, as shown under column “X” on the invoices, net, packed, on the basis of export value, as that value is defined in section 402 or 402a of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. § 1401a) or as amended by the *419Customs Simplification Act of 1956, 91 Treas. Dec. 295, T.D. 54165 (19 U.S.C. § 1402). The entry papers were received in evidence without being marked.

The parties hereto further agreed that the entered invoice unit values, net, packed, are the correct values pursuant to section 402 and 402a, depending upon the dates of entry.

Upon the record before the court, I find and hold that export value, as that value is defined in section 402 or 402a of the Tariff Act of 1930, or as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, *supra,*is the proper basis of value for the sanitary porcelainware in issue and that said value is represented by the entered invoice unit values, net, packed.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
No. 57884.

protest 188835-K (Rochester).

#### Bausch & Lomb Optical Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, G. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of metal hinges, which are parts of spectacle frames (the frames being valued in excess of $2.50 per dozen), and that the issue is the same in all material respects as that the subject of Abstract 57607, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>                                      0001051719
<NAME>                                     UDI
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          75,758
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   79,484
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    263,506
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               423,706
<PP&E>                                         152,084
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,045,182
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          359,160
<BONDS>                                        200,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           180
<OTHER-SE>                                      73,647
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,045,182
<SALES>                                        921,313
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               921,313
<CGS>                                          815,533
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  955,566
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (915)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              38,489
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (65,950)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,201
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (69,151)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (69,151)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        


</TABLE>
# C_2018392EN.01002201.xml

| 29.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 392/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 392/22

---

Judgment of the General Court of 18 September 2018 — Barosso Truta and Others v Court of Justice of the European Union

(Case T-702/16 P) (1)

((Appeal - Civil Service - Contractual staff - Pensions - Transfer to the European Union pension scheme of pension rights acquired previously under national schemes - Harm resulting from the allegedly insufficient information provided to the appellants by the AECC when communicating proposals concerning additional pensionable years concerning those appellants - Claim for compensation dismissed at first instance - Fourth paragraph of Article 77 of the Staff Regulations - Material harm))

(2018/C 392/26)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellants: José Barosso Truta (Bofferdange, Luxembourg), Marc Forli (Lexy, France), Calogero Galante (Aix-sur-Cloie, Belgium), Bernard Gradel (Konacker, France) (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: Court of Justice of the European Union (represented by: J. Inghelram and Á. Almendros Manzano, acting as Agents)

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 20 July 2016, Barosso Truta and Others v Court of Justice of the European Union (F-126/15, EU:F:2016:159), and seeking to have that judgment set aside.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders the appellants to bear a quarter of their costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the appellants to bear a quarter of their costs;

| 3. | Orders the Court of Justice of the European Union to bear its own costs and to pay three quarters of the costs incurred by the appellants. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Court of Justice of the European Union to bear its own costs and to pay three quarters of the costs incurred by the appellants.

---

(1)  OJ C 441, 28.11.2016.

---
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32 (b)

 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northland Cable Television, Inc. and
Subsidiary (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form
10-Q"), I, Gary Jones, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that;

      (1) The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)
      or (15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78(d));
      and

      (2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.

DATE: 5-16-05

/s/ GARY S. JONES
--------------------------------
Gary S. Jones
President
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement will be retained by Northland Cable
Television, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
# C_2016410EN.01000701.xml

| 7.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 410/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 410/7

---

Appeal brought on 9 August 2016 by Kohrener Landmolkerei GmbH and DHG Deutsche Heumilchgesellschaft mbH against the order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) made on 8 June 2016 in Case T–178/15, Kohrener Landmolkerei and DHG v Commission

(Case C-446/16 P)

(2016/C 410/07)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Appellants: Kohrener Landmolkerei GmbH and DHG Deutsche Heumilchgesellschaft mbH (represented by: A. Wagner, lawyer)

Appellants:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Other party to the proceedings:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The appellants claim that the Court should:

| — | set aside the order of the General Court of 8 June 2016 and find against the respondent; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the order of the General Court of 8 June 2016 and find against the respondent;

| — | declare admissible the appellants’ notice of opposition of 23 December 2014 in procedure AT-TSG-0007-01035. |
| --- | --- |

—

declare admissible the appellants’ notice of opposition of 23 December 2014 in procedure AT-TSG-0007-01035.

Grounds of appeal and main arguments

Grounds of appeal and main arguments

In the order under appeal, the General Court took the view that the appellants’ arguments related only to the late transmission of the notice of opposition by the national authority. The appellants, however, state that they also claimed that they were placed at a disadvantage by the stipulation in the second subparagraph of Article 51(1) of Regulation No 1151/2012 (1) and that that provision is unlawful because it does not contain any rule on the period within which the national authority had to transmit the appellants’ notice of opposition to the respondent. In that regard, the appellants referred to a flaw in that provision resulting in a situation in which, in the worst-case scenario, they would be unable to lodge a notice of opposition at all. The General Court did not rule on that issue.

1

In the order presently under appeal, the General Court held only that the appellants had not adequately invoked the unlawfulness of that provision. However, the appellants had already referred in their application to the issue of the incorrect determination of the period in the second subparagraph of Article 51(1) of Regulation No 1151/2012. This means that the appellants did object to the rule laid down by the aforementioned provision and proceeded on the basis that their rights as opposing parties had not been adequately respected.

---

(1)  Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural foodstuffs (OJ 2012 L 343, p. 1).

1

---
Page 1 of 1

 IRC Handout 08/17/2022

Proposed USSGL Account Modification for Uninvested Funds Interest Payable (To Be Effective Fiscal Year 2023)

Account Title: Accrued Interest Payable on Uninvested Funds

Account Number: 214900

Normal Balance: Credit

Current Definition: This account is used to record the amount of interest accrued and owed to Treasury for borrowings of uninvested funds. 

This account does not close at year-end.

Proposed Definition: This account is used to record the amount of interest accrued and owed to Treasury for borrowings of uninvested funds. 

This account does not close at year-end.

Justification: To clarify the nature of the interest accrued and owed to federal trading partners on Uninvested Funds. The term “to Treasury” 

left confusion as to the nature of the USSGL account.
----

| Date:  March      10, 2010 | /s/      Richard A. Hubbell                                |   |
|--------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                 | Richard      A. Hubbell                                    |   |
|                                 | President      and Chief Executive Officer                 |   |
|                                 | (Principal      Executive Officer)                         |   |
|                                 |                                                       |   |
|                                 |                                                       |   |
|                                 |                                                       |   |
|                                 |                                                       |   |
| Date:  March      10, 2010 | /s/      Ben M. Palmer                                     |   |
|                                 | Ben      M. Palmer                                         |   |
|                                 | Vice      President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
|                                 | (Principal      Financial and Accounting Officer)          |   |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0000050073
<NAME> INDEPENDENCE LEAD MINES CO
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                          55,678
<SECURITIES>                                     2,908
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,500
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                60,086
<PP&E>                                       3,236,327<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,296,413
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          105,065
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     4,369,993
<OTHER-SE>                                 (1,479,859)<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,296,413
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                32,615
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,810
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (29,023)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (29,023)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (29,023)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)
<FN>
<F1>Consists of $3,236,327 in resource properties and claims.
<F2>Consists of $119,873 deficit in additional paid-in captial plus a
deficit of $1,360,022 accumulated during the development stage.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K (the Report) of
I.D. Systems, Inc. (the Corporation) for the year ended December 31, 2010, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Ned
Mavrommatis, Chief Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
to my knowledge, that:

(1) The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.

|                       |                                
|---------------------- | -------------------------------
|Dated: March
 30, 2011 | /s/ Ned
 Mavrommatis           
|                       |                                
|                       | Name: Ned
 Mavrommatis         
|                       | Title: Chief
 Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of
Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being
filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or
other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Corporation
and will be retained by the Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
# C_2016371EN.01000402.xml

| 10.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 371/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 371/4

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 18 July 2016 — X BV v Staatssecretaris van Financiën

(Case C-398/16)

(2016/C 371/05)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: X BV

Appellant:

Respondent: Staatssecretaris van Financiën

Respondent:

Question referred

Question referred

Must Articles 43 EC and 48 EC (now Articles 49 TFEU and 54 TFEU) be interpreted as precluding national legislation on the basis of which a parent company established in a Member State is not allowed to deduct interest in respect of a loan associated with a capital contribution made to a subsidiary established in another Member State, whereas that deduction could have been availed of if that subsidiary had been included with that parent company in a single tax entity — with characteristics such as those of a Netherlands single tax entity — in view of the fact that, in that case, by reason of consolidation, there would be no obvious association with such a capital contribution?

---
# C_2017437EN.01002801.xml

| 18.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 437/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 437/28

---

Judgment of the General Court of 8 November 2017 — De Nicola v Court of Justice of the European Union

(Case T-99/16) (1)

1

((Non-contractual liability - Civil service - EIB staff - Psychological harassment - Failure to comply with the rules governing the right to a fair hearing - Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights - Reasonable time - Claims for compensation made in the context of an action pending before the Civil Service Tribunal - Partial referral of the case to the General Court))

(2017/C 437/33)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Carlo De Nicola (Strassen, Luxembourg) (represented by: initially by L. Isola and G. Isola, and subsequently by G. Ferabecoli, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Court of Justice of the European Union (represented by: initially by J. Inghelram, P. Giusta and L. Tonini Alabiso, and subsequently by J. Inghelram, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application under Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation for the damage which the applicant claims to have suffered as a result of, first, the psychological harassment to which he has been subjected by the European Investment Bank (EIB), on the one hand, and the supposedly unfair nature of the proceedings before the European Union Civil Service Tribunal and the General Court to which he has been a party, on the other, and, second, the allegedly excessive duration of those proceedings.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Carlo De Nicola to pay the costs relating to the present proceedings before both the General Court of the European Union and the European Union Civil Service Tribunal. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Carlo De Nicola to pay the costs relating to the present proceedings before both the General Court of the European Union and the European Union Civil Service Tribunal.

---

(1)  OJ C 414, 14.12.2015 (case initially registered before the European Union Civil Service Tribunal as Case F-100/15).

1

---
#### Carzell MOORE, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Walter D. ZANT, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Center, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 82-8683.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

July 23, 1984.

Robert E. Morin, Stephen B. Bright, Atlanta, Ga., for petitioner-appellant.

Susan Boleyn, William B. Hill, Jr., Asst. Attys. Gen., Atlanta, Ga., for respondentappellee.

Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, RONEY, TJOFLAT, HILL, FAY, VANCE, KRAVITCH, JOHNSON, HENDERSON, HATCHETT, ANDERSON and CLARK, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

The court en banc holds this case in abeyance for a period of 60 days in order that petitioner may present to the courts of the State of Georgia claims he may have arising out of *Stynchcombe v. Floyd,*252 Ga. 113, 311 S.E.2d 828 (1984).
SAM Set Up

Step 1 – Access Group Structure 

The Shared Accounting Module (SAM)’s Conversion Team will need to determine the organizational structure for all 

Federal Program Agencies (FPA). This organizational makeup is referred to as an Access Group structure within the 

SAM Application. Access Groups consist of one or more ALCs with some business commonality regarding cash flows 

within the SAM application. For example, if your agency has multiple sites administering a given program according to the 

same accounting rules, and each site uses a different ALC, then those ALCs would comprise one access group. Access 

groups can be further divided into subgroups to more narrowly focus system and data privileges. 

Step 2 – Cash Flow Profile 

The Shared Accounting Module (SAM) will validate, translate, or default transactions based upon the FPA’s Cash Flow 

Profile. The Classification Key (C-Key) information located on the Cash Flow Profile will serve as a crosswalk for the 

agency’s collections, RITS, and TRACS transactions. 

Step 3 – PLSA User Authorization Form 

This form authorizes a member of the FPA’s organization to serve as the Primary Local Security Administrator (PLSA) for 

the Shared Accounting Module (SAM). Only one PLSA can exist per Access Group. The PLSA will have the ability to 

designate other individuals as SAM Users or Local Security Administrators. 

Step 4 – Provisioning Additional Users 

The PLSA will work with any additional agency users that require access to the Shared Accounting Module to establish 

their account within SAM. A Cash Flow Administrator (CFA) is required for agencies reporting collections, RITS, and 

TRACS through the SAM application. Agency users can also utilize the Local Security Administrators (LSA), Agency 

Viewer (AV), or Data Downloader (DD) roles. 

Step 5 – Default Rules 

Default rules provide for a high level interim TAS/ BETC classification in the event that the original classification 

information is missing or invalid. Default rules are established and maintained at the access group level. Current rules 

may become invalid due to expiration of a TAS, a BETC or the combination of both. Managing access group default rules 

allows the appropriate user to create, modify, and delete current and pending rules.

Step 6 – Upload Cash Flow Profile 

The Cash Flow Administrator (CFA) is responsible for uploading and managing the final Cash Flow Profile created in Step 

2 of the SAM Set Up process. 

For Questions Please Contact A SAM Conversion Team Member 

Harold Grice Ryan McCluskey Tammy Oslica 

314.444.4238 314.444.3736

Email: sam.conversion@stls.frb.org 

314.444.0919