alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1438 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1438

 To redesignate the Jefferson National Expansion Memorial in the State 
           of Missouri as the ``Gateway Arch National Park''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 26, 2017

  Mr. Blunt (for himself and Mrs. McCaskill) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To redesignate the Jefferson National Expansion Memorial in the State 
           of Missouri as the ``Gateway Arch National Park''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Gateway Arch National Park 
Designation Act''.

SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF GATEWAY ARCH NATIONAL PARK.

    (a) Redesignation.--The Jefferson National Expansion Memorial 
established under the Act of May 17, 1954 (16 U.S.C. 450jj et seq.), 
shall be known and designated as the ``Gateway Arch National Park''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
paper, or other record of the United States to the Jefferson National 
Expansion Memorial shall be considered to be a reference to the 
``Gateway Arch National Park''.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Annual Report of Wherify Wireless, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

February 16, 2006

                                                         /s/ Timothy Neher
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Timothy Neher
                                                         Chief Executive Officer
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-11 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-11 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 86-11 Filed 10/12/2004 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 24.1
**POWER OF ATTORNEY**
     Peter A. Darbee, theundersigned, Director of PG&E National Energy Group,Inc., hereby constitutes and appoints Thomas B. King as his attorney-in-factwith full power of substitution to sign and file with the Securities andExchange Commission in his capacity as Director of said corporation the Form10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2002, required by Section 13or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and any and all amendments andother filings or documents related thereto, and hereby ratifies all that saidattorney-in-fact does or causes to be done by virtue hereof.
     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Ihave executed this document this 4th day of March,2003.                         /s/ Peter A.Darbee
Exhibit
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual report of Pacificap Entertainment Holdings, Inc.
      (the
“Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Edward Litwak, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Pacificap Entertainment Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Pacificap
      Entertainment Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.





Date:
                May 19, 2006
            
            By:
            */s/
                EDWARD LITWAK*Edward
                LitwakPrincipal
                Financial Officer
Before the First Division,

January 30, 1950

No. 53992.

#### Ben Jacobson *v.*United States,

protest 150547-K (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

When the case was called for hearing there was no appearance on behalf of the plaintiff. An examination of the official papers failing to disclose any reason for disturbing the action of the collector, which was presumptively correct, the protest was overruled.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Global Resource Corporation (the "Company") hereby
certifies to my knowledge that the Company's annual report on Form 10-KSB for
the year ended December 31, 2006 (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission the on date hereof, fully complies with the requirements
of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed to be part of the Report or "filed" for any
purpose whatsoever.


Date: April 16, 2007                        Name:    /s/ Jeffrey J. Andrews
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Jeffrey J. Andrews
                                            Title:   Chief Financial Officer
Before the First Division,

February 7, 1945

No. 49998.

#### Protests 23578-K, etc., of Chong Kee Jan & Co. et al. (San Francisco, etc.).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Case 2:05-cv-03866-MMB Document 4 Filed 09/29/05 Page 1 of 17
Case 2:05-cv-03866-MMB Document 4 Filed 09/29/05 Page 2 of 17
Case 2:05-cv-03866-MMB Document 4 Filed 09/29/05 Page 3 of 17
Case 2:05-cv-03866-MMB Document 4 Filed 09/29/05 Page 4 of 17
Case 2:05-cv-03866-MMB Document 4 Filed 09/29/05 Page 5 of 17
Case 2:05-cv-03866-MMB Document 4 Filed 09/29/05 Page 6 of 17
Case 2:05-cv-03866-MMB Document 4 Filed 09/29/05 Page 7 of 17
Case 2:05-cv-03866-MMB Document 4 Filed 09/29/05 Page 8 of 17
Case 2:05-cv-03866-MMB Document 4 Filed 09/29/05 Page 9 of 17
Case 2:05-cv-03866-MMB Document 4 Filed 09/29/05 Page 10 of 17
Case 2:05-cv-03866-MMB Document 4 Filed 09/29/05 Page 11 of 17
Case 2:05-cv-03866-MMB Document 4 Filed 09/29/05 Page 12 of 17
Case 2:05-cv-03866-MMB Document 4 Filed 09/29/05 Page 13 of 17
Case 2:05-cv-03866-MMB Document 4 Filed 09/29/05 Page 14 of 17
Case 2:05-cv-03866-MMB Document 4 Filed 09/29/05 Page 15 of 17
Case 2:05-cv-03866-MMB Document 4 Filed 09/29/05 Page 16 of 17
Case 2:05-cv-03866-MMB Document 4 Filed 09/29/05 Page 17 of 17
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          20,133
<SECURITIES>                                   103,668
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,100
<ALLOWANCES>                                       112
<INVENTORY>                                        267
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               138,810
<PP&E>                                           9,515
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,309
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 154,510
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           22,480
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           156
<OTHER-SE>                                     130,623
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   154,510
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                60,506
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   40,024
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   907
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  17
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 24,856
<INCOME-TAX>                                     8,949
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             15,907
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,907
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.02


</TABLE>
# C_2017269EN.01002202.xml

| 14.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/22

---

Order of the General Court of 22 June 2017 — Vankerckhoven-Kahmann v Commission

(Case T-582/16) (1)

1

((Civil service - Officials - Career reconstruction - Refusal to promote - Inter-institutional transfer - Classification in grade - Request within the meaning of Article 90(1) of the Staff Regulations - Reasonable period - Inadmissible))

(2017/C 269/32)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Monique Vankerckhoven-Kahmann (Enghien, Belgium) (represented by: N. Lhoëst, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by G. Berscheid and C. Berardis-Kayser and subsequently by G. Berscheid and L. Radu Bouyon, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought under Article 270 TFEU, seeking annulment, first, of the Commission’s decision of 17 April 2015 refusing to re-grade the applicant on her transfer and, secondly, of the Commission’s decision of 9 November 2015 rejecting her complaint lodged on 17 July 2015.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | Monique Vankerckhoven-Kahmann is ordered to bear her own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Monique Vankerckhoven-Kahmann is ordered to bear her own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 145, 25.4.2016 (case initially registered before the European Union Civil Service Tribunal under number F-11/15 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1.9.2016).

1

---
XS^/SFILE COPY

CCA # 13-13-00579-CR OFFENSE: Aggravated Perjury

STYLE: Christopher Long v. The State of Texas COUNTY: De Witt

TRIAL COURT: 24th District Court

TRIAL COURT #: 13-05-11,818 MOTION

TRIAL COURT JUDGE: Hon

ed

Jack W. Marr FOR REHEARING IS:

DISPOSITION: Affirm DATE: January 15, 2015

JUDGE: Longoria

DATE:

JUSTICE: PC S

PUBLISH: DNP:

CLK RECORD: X SUPP CLK RECORD

RPT RECORD: X SUPP RPT RECORD X

STATE BR: X SUPP BR X

APP BR: X PROSE BR

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

APPBLLAMT S Petition

FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IN CCA IS:

DATE: W. IC. ?&/<

JUDGE: /%:

CCA IS:.

JUDGE:

MOTION FOR REHEARING IN

ON

CCA# ast-dr

Disposition:

DATE:

JUDGE:

SIGNED:.

PUBLISH:

PC:.

DNP:

MOTION FOR STAY OF MANDATE IS:

ON

JUDGE:
Exhibit
23.1





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of I.D.
Systems, Inc. on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-87973, 333-134142, 333-134138 and
333-144709) and on Form S-3 (No. 333-116144) of our reports dated March 30, 2010
with respect to our audits of the consolidated balance sheets of I.D.
Systems, Inc. as of December 31, 2008 and 2009, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity, cash flows and
schedule for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2009,
which reports appear in the December 31, 2009 annual report on Form 10-K of I.D.
Systems, Inc.




We also
consent to the reference to our firm under the heading “Experts” in the
Registration Statement on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-116144).





/s/
Eisner LLP





New York,
New York


March 30,
2010
Exhibit 24



POWER OF ATTORNEY



Each person whose name is signed hereto has made, constituted and appointed, and does hereby make, constitute and appoint, JULIE A. BOLAND, and ROCHELLE F. WALK, his or
her true and lawful attorney, for him or her and in his or her name, place and stead to affix, as attorney-in-fact, his or her signature as a director or officer or both, as the case may be, of Oglebay Norton Company, an Ohio corporation (the
Company), to the Annual Report on form 10-K of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the Annual Report), to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and any and all amendments and modifications to the
Annual Report, giving and granting unto each such attorney-in-fact full power and authority to do and perform every act and thing whatsoever necessary to be done, as fully as he or she might or could do if personally present, hereby ratifying and
confirming all that each such attorney-in-fact shall lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.



IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Power of Attorney, which may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original but all of which shall together constitute one and the same instrument, shall be
deemed signed at Cleveland, Ohio, this 4thday of March 2005.



|                              |  |                                                                                      
|----------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                              | 
|/s/    MICHAEL D.
LUNDIN      |  | President and Chief Executive Officer Principal Executive Officer; Director          
|Michael D. Lundin             | 
|                              | 
|/s/    JULIE A. BOLAND        |  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
|Julie A. Boland               | 
|                              | 
|/s/    THOMAS O. BOUCHER,
JR. |  | Chairman of the Board of Directors                                                   
|Thomas O. Boucher, Jr.        | 
|                              | 
|/s/    DELYLE W.
BLOOMQUIST   |  | Director                                                                             
|DeLyle W. Bloomquist          | 
|                              | 
|/s/    EUGENE I. DAVIS        |  | Director                                                                             
|Eugene I. Davis               | 
|                              | 
|/s/    LAURENCE V.
GODDARD    |  | Director                                                                             
|Laurence V. Goddard           | 
|                              | 
|/s/    ROBERT H.
KANNER       |  | Director                                                                             
|Robert H. Kanner              | 
|                              | 
|/s/    JOHN P.
OBRIEN        |  | Director                                                                             
|John P. OBrien               |
# C_2018123EN.01001701.xml

| 9.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 123/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 123/17

---

Judgment of the General Court of 23 February 2018 — Schniga v CPVO (Gala Schnico)

(Case T-445/16) (1)

1

((Plant variety rights - Application for Community plant variety rights for the plant variety Gala Schnico - Technical examination - Obligation to state reasons - First sentence of Article 75 of Regulation (EC) No 2100/94 - Uniformity - Article 8 of Regulation No 2100/94 - Complementary examination - Article 57(3) of Regulation No 2100/94 - Equal treatment - Examination of the facts by the CPVO of its own motion - Article 76 of Regulation No 2100/94))

(2018/C 123/22)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Schniga GmbH (Bolzano, Italy) (represented by: G. Würtenberger and R. Kunze, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO) (represented by: M. Ekvad, F. Mattina and U. Braun-Mlodecka, acting as Agents, and by A. von Mühlendahl and H. Hartwig, lawyers)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Board of Appeal of the CPVO of 22 April 2016 (Case A 005/2014) concerning an application for a Community plant variety right in respect of the plant variety Gala Schnico.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Schniga GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Schniga GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 364, 3.10.2016.

1

---
No. 52162.

protest 132574-K (New York).

#### Buckingham Corporation *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

From an examination of the papers the court was unable to' find any evidence sufficient to overcome the action of the collector, which was presumptively correct. The protest was therefore overruled.
Before the First Division,

August 25, 1948

No. 52516.

protest 130524-K (New York).

#### Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cole, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise in question is the same in all material respects as the estrogenic hormone passed upon in *Roche-Organon*v. *United States*(35 C. C. P. A. 99, C. A. D. 378). The claim at 10 percent under paragraph 34 was therefore sustained.
(Reap. Dec. 10310)

Entry No. N-908.

#### J. C. Penney Purchasing Corp. *v.*United States

*364(Decided August 7, 1962)

*Sharretts, Paley <& Carter*for the plaintiff.

*Joseph*D. *Guilfoyle,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Olivee, Chief Judge:

The merchandise the subject of the above-enumerated appeal for reappraisement consists of leather bags, exported from Italy in 1961.

Counsel for the parties have submitted the said appeal for decision upon stipulation, on the basis of which I find that export value, as defined in section 402(b), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise involved and that such value was the appraised unit value, less the amount added for inland freight.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
No. 64786.

#### R. H. Macy & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 60/563 and 60/6558 (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of valances similar in all material respects to those the subject of *D. N. & M. Walter & Co. et al.*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 26, C.D. 2098), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 63563.

protests 156678-K, etc. (New York).

#### The Fan Co. and National Carloading Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

*420Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that tbe merchandise consists of candlesticks similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 62036, except that they are not plated with platinum, gold, or silver, nor colored with gold lacquer, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
# 22

&"Calibri,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2018-05	&"Arial,Bold"&10&KFF0000DRAFT&K01+000 VII EDR - &P      	&"Arial,Bold"&10IRC Handout 4/26/18

# 23

&"Calibri,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2018-05	&"Arial,Bold"&10&KFF0000DRAFT&K01+000 VII EDR - &P      	&"Arial,Bold"&10IRC Handout 4/26/18
# C_2019131EN.01004502.xml

| 8.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 131/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 131/45

---

Order of the Vice-President of the General Court of 15 February 2019 — Aresu v Commission

(Case T-524/16 R)

(Interim measures - Civil Service - Officials - Reform of the Staff Regulations of 1 January 2014 - Reduced number of days of annual leave - Replacement of travelling time by home leave - Application for interim measures - No urgency)

(2019/C 131/52)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Antonio Aresu (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: M. Velardo, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Gattinara and F. Simonetti, agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: European Parliament (represented by: E. Taneva and M. Ecker, acting as Agents); and Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and R. Meyer, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Articles 278 and 279 TFEU seeking, first, the suspension of operation of the decision reducing the number of the applicant’s additional leave days from five to two and a half days, on the basis of Article 7 of Annex V to the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union, as amended by Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1023/2013 of the Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2013 (OJ 2013 L 287, p. 15), and, secondly, the adoption of interim measures to enable the applicant to continue to benefit, on a provisional basis, from the same number of additional leave days that he enjoyed, in the form of travelling time, before 1 January 2014, with retroactive effect from 1 January 2014 until the decision in the main proceedings is delivered or, if prior to the delivery of that decision, until the retirement date of the applicant.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---