alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1411 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide for a five-year extension 

of the payment of the special survivor indemnity allowance under the 

Survivor Benefit Plan. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 22, 2017 

Mr. NELSON introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To amend title 10, United States Code, to provide for a 

five-year extension of the payment of the special survivor 

indemnity allowance under the Survivor Benefit Plan. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. FIVE-YEAR EXTENSION OF PAYMENT OF SPE4 CIAL SURVIVOR INDEMNITY ALLOWANCE 

5 UNDER SURVIVOR BENEFIT PLAN. 

6 Section 1450(m) of title 10, United States Code, is 

7 amended— 

8 (1) in paragraph (2)(I), by striking ‘‘and 2018’’ 

9 and inserting ‘‘through 2023’’; and 


SSpencer on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1411 IS

1 (2) in paragraph (6)— 

2 (A) by striking ‘‘May 31, 2018’’ and in3 serting ‘‘September 30, 2023’’; and 

4 (B) by striking ‘‘June 1, 2018’’ each place 

5 it appears and inserting ‘‘October 1, 2023’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE



<TABLE>
<CAPTION>


                                                                       Three month period ended June 30,
                                                                             1998                1997
<S>                                                                  <C>                     <C>   


Weighted average shares outstanding
            Common stock                                                   5,037,995           2,839,286

Net loss                                                                 $  (681,531)         $ (264,186)

Net loss per share (1)                                                        ($0.14)             ($0.09)



                                                                        Six month period ended June 30,
                                                                            1998                  1997

Weighted average shares outstanding
            Common stock                                                   4,036,259           2,839,286

Net loss                                                               $  (1,210,878)       $   (548,840)

Net loss per share (1)                                                       ($0.30)              ($0.19)


     (1) There is no difference between basic and diluted net loss per share.

</TABLE>
No. 52214.

protests 483667-G, etc. (New York).

#### Alfred Friedman Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). The claim at 50 percent ad valorem under paragraph 915, plus any additional duty applicable under paragraph 924, was therefore sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1206 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1206

 To ensure fair treatment in licensing requirements for the export of 
                          certain echinoderms.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 23, 2017

 Mr. King (for himself and Ms. Collins) introduced the following bill; 
 which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To ensure fair treatment in licensing requirements for the export of 
                          certain echinoderms.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. EXEMPTION OF EXPORTATION OF CERTAIN ECHINODERMS FROM 
              PERMISSION AND LICENSING REQUIREMENTS.

    (a) Exemption.--Not later than 30 days after the date of enactment 
of this Act, the Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife 
Service shall amend section 14.92 of title 50, Code of Federal 
Regulations, to clarify that--
            (1) fish or wildlife described in subsection (b) are 
        fishery products exempt from the export permission requirements 
        of section 9(d)(1) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 
        U.S.C. 1538(d)(1)); and
            (2) any person may engage in business as an exporter of 
        fish or wildlife described in subsection (b) without 
        procuring--
                    (A) permission under section 9(d)(1) of the 
                Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1538(d)(1)); 
                or
                    (B) an export license under subpart I of part 14 of 
                title 50, Code of Federal Regulations (or successor 
                regulations).
    (b) Covered Fish or Wildlife.--The fish or wildlife referred to in 
subsection (a) are members of the phylum Echinodermata that are 
commonly known as sea urchins and sea cucumbers (including any products 
of those members of the phylum Echinodermata) that--
            (1) do not require a permit under part 16, 17, or 23 of 
        title 50, Code of Federal Regulations (or successor 
        regulations);
            (2)(A) are harvested in waters under the jurisdiction of 
        the United States; or
            (B) are processed in the United States; and
            (3) are--
                    (A) exported for purposes of human or animal 
                consumption; or
                    (B) taken in waters under the jurisdiction of the 
                United States or on the high seas for recreational 
                purposes.
                                 <all>
```
January 30, 1952

No. 56342.

Suit 4667.

#### Brier Manufacturing Co. *v.*United States.

C. D. 1286 reversed November 7, 1951. C. A. D. 465.
No. 63568.

protests 59/13572 and 59/16353 (New York).

#### Frederik Lunning, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of vases in mineral colors similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 62694, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# THE STATE OF TEXAS

M A N D A T E

*********************************************

TO THE 241ST DISTRIC T COURT OF SMITH COU NTY, GREETING:

Before our Court of Appeals for the 12th Court of Appeals District of Texas, on the 22nd
day of July, 2015 , the cause u pon appeal to revise or reverse your judgment between

DENNIS MONTRELL BEND Y , Appellant

NO. 12

- 14

- 00255

- CR; Trial Court No. 241

- 1575

- 13

Opinion by James T. Worthen, Chief Justice.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

was determined; and therein our said Court made its order in these words:

“ THIS CAUSE came to be heard on the appellate record and briefs filed herein, and the same being considered, it is the opinion of this court that there was no error in the judgment.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED and D ECREED that the judgment of the court

below be in all things affirmed , and that this decision be certified to the court below for

observance. ”

WHEREAS, WE COMMAND YOU to observe the order of our said Court of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals Distr ict of Texas in this behalf, and in all things have it duly recognized, obeyed, and executed.

WITNESS, THE HONORABLE JAMES T. WORTHEN , Chief Justice of our Court of Appeals for the Twelfth Court of Appeals District, with the Seal thereof affixed, at the Ci ty of Tyler, this the 29 th day of December , 2015.

PAM ESTES , CLERK

By:

_______________________________ Chief Deputy Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1285 Referred in House (RFH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1285

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           November 30, 2017

             Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To allow the Confederated Tribes of Coos, Lower Umpqua, and Siuslaw 
   Indians, the Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Community of 
   Oregon, the Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians of Oregon, the 
Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs, the Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe 
of Indians, the Klamath Tribes, and the Burns Paiute Tribes to lease or 
                        transfer certain lands.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Oregon Tribal Economic Development 
Act''.

SEC. 2. APPROVAL NOT REQUIRED TO VALIDATE LAND TRANSACTIONS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, 
without further approval, ratification, or authorization by the United 
States, the Confederated Tribes of Coos, Lower Umpqua, and Siuslaw 
Indians, the Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Community of 
Oregon, the Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians of Oregon, the 
Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs, the Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe 
of Indians, the Klamath Tribes, and the Burns Paiute Tribes may lease, 
sell, convey, warrant, or otherwise transfer all or any part of its 
interests in any real property that is not held in trust by the United 
States for the benefit of such tribe.
    (b) Trust Land Not Affected.--Nothing in this section shall--
            (1) authorize the Confederated Tribes of Coos, Lower 
        Umpqua, and Siuslaw Indians, the Confederated Tribes of the 
        Grand Ronde Community of Oregon, the Confederated Tribes of 
        Siletz Indians of Oregon, the Confederated Tribes of Warm 
        Springs, the Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe of Indians, the 
        Klamath Tribes, and the Burns Paiute Tribes to lease, sell, 
        convey, warrant, or otherwise transfer all or any part of an 
        interest in any real property that is held in trust by the 
        United States for the benefit of such tribe; or
            (2) affect the operation of any law governing leasing, 
        selling, conveying, warranting, or otherwise transferring any 
        interest in such trust land.

            Passed the Senate November 29, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                JULIE E. ADAMS,

                                                             Secretary.
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

TOLEDO MACK SALES & :

SERVICE, INC., : CIVIL ACTION

:

Plaintiff, : NO. 02-4373

:

v. :

:

MACK TRUCKS, INC., :

:

Defendant. :

______________________________________________________________________________

MACK TRUCKS, INC., :

:

Counterclaim Plaintiff, :

:

v. :

:

TOLEDO MACK SALES & :

SERVICE, INC., :

:

Counterclaim Defendant. :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 12 day of September, 2006, upon consideration of th

Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff Mack Trucks, Inc.’s Motion in Limine to exclude the expert

testimony of William Harris (Docket No. 73), and all responses filed thereto, and after oral

argument having been held, it is hereby ORDERED that said Motion is DENIED WITHOUT

PREJUDICE. 

BY THE COURT:

 s/ Ronald L. Buckwalter, S. J. 

RONALD L. BUCKWALTER, S.J.

Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 111 Filed 09/13/2006 Page 1 of 1
---

PROMISSORY NOTE



|Name of Borrower: | Infitech Ventures Inc.               
|----------------- | -------------------------------------
|                  | 20 Lyall Avenue                      
|                  | Toronto Ontario, Canada M4E
      1V9



|Name of Lender: | Paul G. Daly                         
|--------------- | -------------------------------------
|                | **20 Lyall
      Avenue**            
|                | Toronto Ontario, Canada M4E
      1V9



| | 1. | For value received, Borrower agrees to pay the Lender
      the amount of $US 5000.00 on a date to be determined. Payment will be sent
      to the Lender at 20 Lyall Avenue, Toronto Ontario Canada M4E 1V9. The loan
      is unsecured, non interest bearing and payable on demand. Payment can be
      made in cash or common stock with any stock repayment subject to
      requirements imposed by the Securities and Exchange Commission under the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated at the City of Toronto this 24thday of August, 2007.

|Signature of Borrower or authorized signatory
      of Corporation | */s/ Paul G. Daly*    
|------------------------------------------------------------------ | ----------------------
|                                                                   |                       
|                                                                   |                       
|Name of authorized signatory of Corporation                        | PAUL G. DALY          
|                                                                   |                       
|                                                                   |                       
|Name of Corporation                                                | INFITECH VENTURES INC.



---
No. 53482.

protests 125149-K, etc. (New York).

#### Arnold Kornicker *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

By virtue of the decision in *Pramette Juvenille Furniture Company*v. *United States*(36 C. C. P. A. 61, C. A. D. 398), the protests were dismissed.
*

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not

precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-50087

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MARK RODGERS

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. SA-96-CR-344-1

December 7, 1998

Before KING, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Mark Rodgers appeals his conviction of possession with the intent to distribute cocaine base

in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). He argues that the district court erred in denying his motion

to suppress evidence. He further argues that the district court abused its discretion in denying his

motion for a mistrial because the prosecutor commented on his post-arrest silence during closing

argument.

We have reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties and conclude that the district court

did not err in denying Rodgers’ motion to suppress evidence. See United States v. Reyes, 792 F.2d

536, 539 (5th Cir. 1986). Furthermore, the district court did not err in denying Rodgers’ motion for
 

**Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966).

2

a mistrial because he failed to prove that the prosecutor commented on his post-Miranda** silence.

See Doyle v. Ohio, 462 U.S. 610 (1976). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
# C_2018063EN.01001202.xml

| 19.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/12

---

Order of the General Court of 15 December 2017 — Kaane American International Tobacco v EUIPO — Global Tobacco (GOLD MONT)

(Case T-293/16) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Revocation of the earlier EU figurative trade mark GOLD MOUNT - No need to adjudicate))

(2018/C 063/16)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Kaane American International Tobacco Co. FZE, formerly Kaane American International Tobacco Co. Ltd (Jebel Ali, United Arab Emirates) (represented by: G. Hinarejos Mulliez and I. Valdelomar Serrano, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: H. O’Neill, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: Global Tobacco FZCO (Dubai, United Arab Emirates) (represented by: G. Hussey, Solicitor, and B. Brandreth, Barrister)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 April 2016 (Case R 2699/2014-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Kaane American International Tobacco and Global Tobacco.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | Each party shall bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Each party shall bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 279, 1.8.2016.

1

---
1 From:

Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2015 1:59 AM

To: RedHill

Subject: Protect our Water from Jet Fuel

Follow Up Flag: Follow up

Flag Status: Flagged

I am writing to express my extreme concern for the quality of our drinking water threatened by the jet fuel leaking from

Navy storage tanks in Red Hill.

Please ensure this jet fuel is completely cleaned up immediately. Twenty

‐ five years is too long. If the leaks cannot be

immediately fixed, then the tan ks must be emptied.

I also ask that the public comment period on the negotiated agreement between the U.S. Navy, Environmental

Protection Agency, and Hawaii Department of Health be extended to allow the public meaningful opportunity to

understand and weigh

‐ in on this important issue.

Please continue to kee p me informed in this decision

‐ making process.

Thank you.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM ITEM 1
OF FORM 10-QSB FOR THE QUARTER ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001051902
<NAME>                        JVWeb, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1
<CURRENCY>                    U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>             JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                  DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>               1
<CASH>                        14512
<SECURITIES>                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                 102661
<ALLOWANCES>                  0
<INVENTORY>                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>              117173
<PP&E>                        4490
<DEPRECIATION>                2580
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                567083
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>         446899
<BONDS>                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>         0
<PREFERRED>                   0
<COMMON>                      104141
<OTHER-SE>                    16043
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>  567083
<SALES>                       62971
<TOTAL-REVENUES>              62971
<CGS>                         40459
<TOTAL-COSTS>                 40459
<OTHER-EXPENSES>              576660
<LOSS-PROVISION>              0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>            8942
<INCOME-PRETAX>               (561090)
<INCOME-TAX>                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>           (561090)
<DISCONTINUED>                0
<EXTRAORDINARY>               0
<CHANGES>                     0
<NET-INCOME>                  (561090)
<EPS-BASIC>                   (0.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                 (0.06)



</TABLE>
No. 66271.

#### Associated Dry Goods Corp. (Lord & Taylor Div.) et al. *v.*United States,

protests 263123-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of nylon woven wearing apparel similar in use to silk woven wearing apparel and following the principles set forth in *United States*v. *Steinberg Bros.*(47 C.C.P.A. 47, C.A.D. 727), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Certifying Officer Training Release 3.0 Information

Fiscal Service is pleased to announce Certifying Officer Training release 3.0 for Federal Employees only.

The Certifying Officer Training program provides vital information for new and existing Certifying

Officers. 

The training is located at https://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/training/ 

Certifying Officer Training release 3.0 includes significant content additions to the current modules.

• Enhancements to the Certifying Officer Core Track

o Improved slide navigation

o Improved user functionality

• A new Advanced module added to the Refresher Track

o Lesson 10: Laws and Guidance Relevant to Internal Controls

o Lesson 11: Components of Internal Control

o Lesson 12: Control Activities

o Lesson 13: Do Not Pay

o Lesson 14: Payment Certification Systems

o Lesson 15: Laws, Regulation, and Guidance Relevant to PCS

o Lesson 16: PCS Automated vs. Manual Payment Entry

• A NEW Manager Track for supervisors of Certifying Officers and Designated Payment Processors

o Basic

o Advanced

Take some time and visit us at https://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/fstraining/training/fs_cot.htm to utilize 

this new and valuable resource to enhance your knowledge and skill set in performing your Certifying 

Officer duties. 

If you have any questions, please contact the Payments Call Center at the Kansas City Financial Center at 

(855) 868-0151, option 2, option 0, or e-mail payments@fiscal.treasury.gov.