alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

H.S. SADOW, JR. CIVIL ACTION

 NO. 02-4476

 VS. 

McNEIL-PPC, INC.

 

MARNA BERKMAN

 VS. NO. 02-4362

McNEIL-PPC, INC.

 

RICHARD KIRSCH, ET AL

 VS. NO. 02-4387

McNEIL-PPC, INC.

 

ANDREW SPARK

NO. 02-4386

 VS.

McNEIL-PPC, INC.

Case 2:02-cv-04386-MK Document 2 Filed 07/12/2002 Page 1 of 2
 ORDER

AND NOW, this 12th of JULY, 2002, it is hereby, 

 ORDERED that the above captioned cases are reassigned from

the calendar of the Honorable Berle M. Schiller to the Honorable Marvin Katz, as

related to Civil Action Nos. 02-4093, 02-4149, 02-4105, 02-4180 and 02-4197.

FOR THE COURT:

 

JAMES T. GILES

Chief Judge

ATTEST:

 

MICHAEL E. KUNZ

Clerk of Court

Case 2:02-cv-04386-MK Document 2 Filed 07/12/2002 Page 2 of 2
!	




		


"#

$	
	
	%!

	






 



!"# $!%	&'!


#


#
#
#(


)
#!


!
#(!!



(

*(!'#


$# #
+#!"# $!%

!	&'#
(

#,$'"*-

##
$# #








"# 

$


	&'&#

.#/0!122/.#

13!122/
(,



224251

##








 

)



#


	
	


	

	

	 	

	

	


	











	









 
	



		
	

!"
"#






	



$



	

	
%&'()
*+*,*+-*.++




	


"/)&&
0*.11$23


4	11
)*+*5+-632+
*+*,*+-56.3

#

	


		
	

6
7%!$ 

#
)



	##&'
(


8
)


# 

)

#



!

# )

!!

'"+##!



!9%-



%-(#



:

&


7%


#,




(;

+
<(!9
()



#)

:

	&'"# $

=/440)

122/!	&'


>?02!222
!




>/
@



@






!#!

-(
Before the Second Division,

September 12, 1951

No. 55871.

protest 127568-K (New York).

#### Naef Watch Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It was stipulated that the items of merchandise in question consist of watch movements similar in all material respects to those which were the subject of *United States*v. *Helbros Watch Co. et al.*(38 C. C. P. A. 1, C. A. D. 430). Upon the agreed statement of facts and the cited authority, the merchandise was held properly dutiable at the base rate of $1.20 each as watch movements more than *%o*of 1 inch but not more than 1 inch wide under paragraph 367 (a) (1), as modified, *supra.*
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_______________________ No. 96-10078

_______________________

ROYAL LLOYDS OF TEXAS; ROYAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

versus QUINN-L FINANCIAL CORP. et al, Defendants-Appellants.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

(3:90-CV-550-H)

_________________________________________________________________
December 30, 1996 Before JOLLY, JONES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: *

The court has carefully considered appellants’ position in light of the briefs, oral argument, pertinent portions of the record, and the extensive previous history of the case in this
court. Having done so, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion in denying appellants’ Rule 60(b)(5) motionfor relief from judgment, and we affirm on essentially the basis

articulated by the district court.

AFFIRM
.
# C_2017269EN.01002301.xml

| 14.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/23

---

Order of the General Court of 14 June 2017 — Márquez Alentà v EUIPO — Fiesta Hotels & Resorts (Representation of an ant)

(Case T-657/16) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Application for an EU figurative mark representing an ant - Revocation of the contested decision - Action which has become devoid of purpose - No need to adjudicate))

(2017/C 269/33)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Marc Márquez Alentà (Cervera, Spain) (represented by: J. Carbonell Callicó, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Zaera Cuadrado, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Fiesta Hotels & Resorts, SL (Ibiza, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 30 June 2016 (Case R 1242/2015-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Fiesta Hotels & Resorts and Mr Márquez Alentà.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall bear its own costs and shall pay the costs incurred by Mr Marc Márquez Alentà. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) shall bear its own costs and shall pay the costs incurred by Mr Marc Márquez Alentà.

---

(1)  OJ C 410, 7.11.2016.

1

---
Exhibit 10.11

    

     

    

    
      

       

      

      350 Fifth Avenue, Suite 7530

      New York, NY 10118

      

      

      9 Cedar Brook Drive

      Cranbury, NJ 08512

      
        


      Tel:  (646) 440-9100

      Fax:  (646) 224-9585

       

      

      November 25, 2020

       

      Carlos Garcia Parada

      350 5th Avenue,

      

      Suite 7530

      

      New York, NY 10118

      

      

      

      Dear  Carlos,

       

      Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is pleased to offer you a position as Chief Financial Officer, starting on Janaury 4, 2021, reporting to Gaurav Shah, MD, Chief Executive Officer.  This is a full-time position located at
        our New York location.

       

      The starting base salary will be $410,000  per year, and you will be eligible for an annual discretionary bonus target of 40% of your
          base salary.  Your 2021 bonus will be pro rata based on your start date.

       

      You will also have healthcare benefits from the first day of employment, the opportunity to participate in a Rocket-sponsored 401(k) plan with 4% match and immediate 100% vesting, and 17 days of
        paid vacation annually.  Our schedule of paid holidays includes a Rocket-wide winter break from December 25 – January 1 of each year.

       

      In addition, subject to applicable approval by the Board of Directors, you will be issued stock options to purchase 125,000 common ordinary shares of Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc. pursuant to the applicable share
        option plan and your option agreement.  Employee shares vest over a three year period: 1/3 after one year, and the remaining 2/3 vesting quarterly over the subsequent two years.

       

      
        
          


      

      Your employment will be “at-will.” This means that either you or Rocket may terminate your employment at any time, with or without notice, and with or without cause.  This letter does not constitute a binding
        agreement and is not an employment contract, and Rocket may change your terms and conditions of employment at any time.

       

      Your employment at Rocket is contingent upon: (i) your providing proof of your right to work in the United States; (ii) your signing our standard Proprietary Information; Inventions Assignment Agreement; and
        Non-Solicitation/Non-Competition agreement; and (iii) if requested by Rocket, satisfactory results of a drug test and/or background test.

       

      Please confirm your acceptance of this offer by signing and returning this letter by Monday, November 30, 2020

       

      We look forward to welcoming you to Rocket!

       

      Sincerely,

       

       

       

      Gaurav D. Shah, MD

       

      President & CEO,

      Rocket Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

       

      Agreed and accepted:

       

      __________________________________________Date: _____

       

      Carlos Garcia Parada
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Ardent Mines Limited(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Taras Chebountchak, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2. The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated this 20th day of October, 2006.



| | TARAS CHEBOUNTCHAK                                 
| | ---------------------------------------------------
| | Taras Chebountchak                                 
| | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer



















---
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

July 18, 2016

No. 04

- 15

- 00655

- CR

Matthew Jamal JACKSON

, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CR0148

Honorable Ron Range l, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena O. Chapa, Justice

Jason Pulliam, Justice

The C ourt has considered the Appella nt ’ s Motion for Rehearing En Banc, and the motion

is DENIED.

_________________________________ Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and af fixed the seal of the said

court on this 18th day of July, 2016

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
| Ground Magnetic Data from within the Long    Valley Caldera, California: A Website for Data Distribution |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By E. D. Anderson and C. A. Finn |
|----------------------------------|

| **Open-File Report 2004–1096** |
|--------------------------------------|

| **Version 1.0** |
|-----------------|
| Published 2004  |

----

| - OF 2004–1096 HTML file | **For viewing online.***(This version of the report is accessible    as defined in Section 508.)* |
|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

| AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices                                                                                                                                                          |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey      URL: https://pubsdata.usgs.gov/pubs/of/2004/1096/Questions or Assistance: USGS Web ContactPage Last Modified: Sat Jan 12 23:13 EDT 2013 |  |

----
# C_2017178EN.01002101.xml

| 6.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/21

---

Order of the General Court of 6 April 2017 — Brancheforeningen for Regulerkraft i Danmark v Commission

(Case T-203/16) (1)

1

((State aid - Complaint - Action for failure to act - Definition of Commission’s position terminating the failure to act - No need to adjudicate))

(2017/C 178/28)

Language of the case: Danish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Brancheforeningen for Regulerkraft i Danmark (Ikast, Denmark) (represented by: N. Gade, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Recchia and S. Maaløe, acting as agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application based on Article 265 TFEU seeking a declaration that the Commission unlawfully failed to comply with the time-limits relating to the duration of the preliminary examination procedure for State aid and, after the opening of the formal procedure, unlawfully failed to take a decision on the complaint, introduced by the applicant, relating to State aid.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | Brancheforeningen for Regulerkraft i Danmark and the European Commission shall bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Brancheforeningen for Regulerkraft i Danmark and the European Commission shall bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 232, 27.6.2016.

1

---
908 4 Overlan d Plaz a St . Louis , M O 6311 4 314-426-611 1 314-426-909 7 ^._ . ^ _ ^ , , ,„ „ erika@murrays-travel.co m ;.;,-" I \ji - ; ; :,jl'Uill/iUUi ^

Marc h 9 . 201 0 Th e Honorabl e Ra y LaHoo d Secretar y Unite d State s Departmen t o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenue , SE Wastiington , D.C . 2059 0 SubjectrHaned aC(mibmatro n Services^AltocanonTroceedin g DtJT-OSr-2010-OOtJ r Dea r Secretar y LaHood : A s adedicate dtrave l partne r o f America n Airlines , I amwritin g in support o f American' s applicatio n to provid e ne w servic e fro mNe w York' s Joh n F . Kenned y Internationa l Airport an dLo s Angele s Internationa l Airport t o Toky o Internationa l Airpor t a t Haneda . 1 recogniz e an dapplau dyo u an dth e Obam aadministratio n fo r you r succes s las t

Decembe r

i n reachin g alandmar

k Ope n Skie s agreemen t

with Japan , whic h open s u p Haned at o servic e by U.S . airlines . 1 encourag e youi ' selectio n o f America n Airline s t o provid e nonsto p servic e fro mNew Yor k an dLo s Angele s t o Haned ai n orde r t o provid e a n essentia l connectio n betwee n thre e o f th e world' s larges t financial an dcommerc e centers . Recen t events , includin g th e successfu l preservatio n o f Japa n Airlines ' oneworl dAllianc e membership , hav e underscore dAmerican' s stron g commitmen t t o th e trans-Pacifi c market . America n i s likewis e committe dt o New Yor k an dLo s Angele s - both vita l foca l point s o f

business , trade , entertainment , teclinolog y an deducatio n - providin g unsurpasse dai r servic e sinc e th e mid

1900 s Bot h th e New Yor

k an dLo s Angele s metr o area s wil l gai n significan t economi c benefit s fromthes e propose dne w flights, a s wil l American' s customers an demployees . However , w e nee dyou r hel p t o mak e th e JF K

& LAX/Haned aconnectio n areality . Therefore . 1 strongl y urg e yo u t o sa y ye s t o America n Airline s an dit s reques t fo r slot s t o fl

y from Kennedy an dLo s Angele s t o Haneda !
```

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 180 (Friday, September 16, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 63701]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-22225]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[EPA-R03-OAR-2016-0304; FRL-9952-47-Region 3]

Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 
Maryland; Control of Volatile Organic Compounds Emissions From 
Fiberglass Boat Manufacturing Materials; Withdrawal of Direct Final 
Rule

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Withdrawal of direct final rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Due to the receipt of a comment, the Environmental Protection 
Agency (EPA) is withdrawing the direct final rule published on August 
1, 2016, to approve the State of Maryland's adoption of the 
requirements in EPA's control technique guidelines (CTG) for fiberglass 
boat manufacturing materials.

DATES: The direct final rule published at 81 FR 50336 on August 1, 
2016, is withdrawn effective September 16, 2016.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Gavin Huang, (215) 814-2042, or by 
email at huang.gavin@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In the direct final rule published on August 
1, 2016 (81 FR 50336), we stated that if we received comment by August 
31, 2016, the rule would be withdrawn and not take effect. EPA received 
a comment before the August 31, 2016 deadline. EPA will address the 
comment received in a subsequent final action based upon the proposed 
action also published on August 1, 2016 (81 FR 50427). EPA will not 
institute a second comment period on this action.

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52

    Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, 
Incorporation by reference, Ozone, Volatile organic compounds.

    Dated: September 6, 2016.
 Shawn M. Garvin,
Regional Administrator, Region III.

0
Accordingly, the direct final rule which published in the Federal 
Register on August 1, 2016, at 81 FR 50336 is withdrawn as of September 
16, 2016.

[FR Doc. 2016-22225 Filed 9-15-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MULTI-GLASS INTERNATIONAL, : CIVIL ACTION

CORP. :

:

V. : NO. 02-4408

:

REFRACTORY AND INSULATION :

SUPPLY CORP., ET AL. :

O R D E R

AND NOW, TO WIT: this 18th day of December, 2002, it having been reported

that the issues between the parties in the above action have been settled and upon Order of the

Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1(b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this

Court , it is

ORDERED that the above action is DISMISSED with prejudice, pursuant to

agreement of counsel without costs.

ALL PENDING MOTIONS ARE DISMISSED AS MOOT.

MICHAEL E. KUNZ, Clerk of Court

BY: ___________________________ 

 Rita L. Polkowski

Deputy Clerk

 

 

Civ 2 (8/2000)

41(b).frm

Case 2:02-cv-04408-WY Document 12 Filed 12/18/2002 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.2

                 Statement of Chief Financial Officer Furnished
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      The undersigned, Gary F. Hoskins, is the Chief Financial Officer of
Citizens South Banking Corporation (the "Company").

      This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the
Company of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2003 (the "Report").

      By execution of this statement, I certify that:

            A)    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
                  U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and

            B)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
                  covered by the Report.

      This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so
that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that this
statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.


November 13, 2003                               /s/ Gary F. Hoskins
------------------                              --------------------------------
Dated                                           Gary F. Hoskins
                                                Chief Financial Officer


                                       25
No. 56979.

#### Norman G. Jensen, Inc. *v.*United States,

petition 6849-R (Pembina).

Ford, Judge:

This petition, filed under the provisions of section 489 of the Tariff Act of 1930, seeks the remission of additional duties incurred by reason of undervaluation of certain merchandise on entry.

The merchandise involved consists of 1,500 bushels of wheat which was exported from Canada and entered at the port of Neche, N. Dak. This wheat was entered at a value of $1.73 per bushel, which should have been in Canadian funds, but the party making the entry treated it as United States funds and, therefore, entered at a total value of $2,595. The appraiser found a value for the wheat of $1.77)4 per bushel, Canadian funds, or a value of $1.68)4 per bushel, American funds, or a total value of $2,524, so that actually the Government received more revenue on this entry than it was entitled to receive, and yet, because of the fact that technically the appraised unit value is in excess of the entered value, there was an undervaluation.

When this case was called for hearing, Mr. Oscar J. Linde, attorney-in-fact for the petitioner herein and also manager for the customhouse broker who prepared this entry, testified that he had been connected with the firm for a period of 12 years and that he prepared and filed the entry covering this wheat; that in making the entry, he overlooked the fact that the invoice stated “Canadian funds”; that the wheat was appraised at a value of $1.77)4 per bushel, Canadian funds, which was equivalent to $1.68)4 per bushel, United States funds; and that the undervaluation was the result of an error in the conversion of the currency.

The witness also testified that in entering this wheat at $1.73 per bushel he did not intend to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the case or to deceive the appraiser as to the correct value of the merchandise.

Counsel for respondent stated at the trial, and we think very properly so, that the report of the investigation which the Government had caused to be made in this case was in substantial agreement with the testimony of the witness heretofore set out.

This record, in our opinion, establishes that the additional duties here involved were the result of an honest mistake on the part of the importer in making entry of its merchandise, and that in entering the merchandise at a value less than that found upon final appraisement, the importer had no intention to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the case or to deceive the appraiser as to the correct value of the wheat. The petition is therefore granted. Judgment will be rendered accordingly.