alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
-    
        - Home
        - News              - Army War College News, Features
          - USAWC Community Information
          - Army, Defense News
          - Sequestration, Furlough News  
        - Galleries              - Photo Galleries
          - Video Galleries  
        - News Feeds              - Early Bird
          - DA Stand-To-News
          - Army.mil
          - DOD American Forces
          - Parameters  
        - Links              - US Army War College
          - Carlisle Barracks Garrison
          - Strategic Studies Institute
          - Center for Strategic Leadership
          - U.S. Army Peacekeeping and Stability Operations Institute
          - Army Heritage and Education Center  
        - Archives
        - RSS Subscription

November 2016

October 2016

September 2016

August 2016

July 2016

June 2016

May 2016

April 2016

March 2016

February 2016

January 2016

December 2015

November 2015

October 2015

September 2015

August 2015

July 2015

June 2015

May 2015

April 2015

March 2015

February 2015

January 2015

December 2014

November 2014

October 2014

September 2014

August 2014

July 2014

June 2014

May 2014

April 2014

March 2014

February 2014

January 2014

December 2013

November 2013

October 2013

September 2013

August 2013

July 2013

June 2013

May 2013

April 2013

March 2013

February 2013

January 2013

December 2012

November 2012

October 2012

September 2012

August 2012

July 2012

June 2012

May 2012

April 2012

March 2012

February 2012

January 2012

December 2011

November 2011

October 2011

September 2011

August 2011

July 2011

June 2011

May 2011

April 2011

March 2011

February 2011

January 2011

December 2010

November 2010

October 2010

September 2010

August 2010

July 2010

June 2010

May 2010

April 2010

March 2010

February 2010

January 2010

December 2009

November 2009

October 2009

September 2009

August 2009

July 2009

June 2009

May 2009

April 2009

March 2009

February 2009

January 2009

December 2008

November 2008

October 2008

September 2008

August 2008

July 2008

June 2008

May 2008

April 2008

March 2008

February 2008

January 2008

December 2007

November 2007

October 2007

September 2007

August 2007

July 2007

December 2002

May 2007

April 2007

March 2007

February 2007

January 2007

December 2006

November 2006

October 2006

September 2006

August  2006

July  2006

June  2006

May   2006

April 2006

March 2006

February  2006

January  2006

December 2005

November 2005

October 2005

September 2005

August  2005

July  2005

June  2005

May   2005

April 2005

March 2005

February  2005

January  2005

December 2004

November 2004

October 2004

September 2004

August  2004

July  2004

June  2004

May   2004

April 2004

March 2004

February  2004

January  2004

December 2003

November 2003

October 2003

September 2003

August  2003

July  2003

June  2003

May   2003

April 2003

March 2003

February  2003

January  2003

Contact Us
| Montana HomeAbout UsNewsProgramsTechnical ResourcesPartnershipsContact Us  |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| SearchMontanaAll NRCS SitesNRCS, FSA & RD forNews- Events and Activities
- Fact Sheets
- Freedom of Information        Act
- News Releases
- National       NRCS        News
- USDA News
- Photo Gallery
- Publications
- Successful Conservation Projects
-  Find a Service Center

2003 Montana Report on Natural Resources Conservation ActivitiesLand, Water, and People
NRCS is proud to continue providing on-site natural resource expertise to help Montana landowners and communities plan and apply conservation systems that improve and maintain environmental quality for all Montanans. NRCS professionals in engineering, biology, agronomy, range, and other sciences are located across the state to support private land conservation efforts. 

This  report covers one fiscal year, from October 1, 2002, to September 30, 2003. The following are highlights of NRCS annual activities.
- 2003 Program Summary    - Montana Farmer Wins NRCS National Excellence in Conservation Award
- NRCS at a Glance
- Budget and Staffing
- Conservation Technical Assistance    - NRCS Assistance to American Indian Tribes
- Resource Conservation and Development (RC&D)
- Plant Materials
- Snow, Water, and Climate Services
- Grazing Lands Conservation Initiative (GLCI)
- Wetlands Reserve Program (WRP)
- Wildlife Habitat Incentives Program (WHIP)

 
 Back to Top  **Montana NRCS Home**        |  Site Map  |       Contact  |       Accessibility  |       NRCS        |  USDA |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
# C_2016454EN.01001801.xml

| 5.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 454/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 454/18

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale civile di Trapani (Italia) lodged on 15 September 2016 — Giuseppa Santoro v Comune di Valderice, Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri

(Case C-494/16)

(2016/C 454/32)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Tribunale civile di Trapani

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Giuseppa Santoro

Defendants: Comune di Valderice, Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri

Questions referred

| 1. | Is the granting of compensation in the amount of between 2,5 and 12 monthly payments of the last overall salary payment (Article 32(5) of Law No 183/2010) to a public employee, who is a victim of the unlawful successive renewal of fixed-term contracts, who may obtain full compensation only by proving the loss of other work opportunities or by proving that, if he had participated in an open competition, he would have been successful, an equivalent and effective measure within the meaning of the judgments of the Court of Justice in Mascolo [and Others (C-22/13, C-61/13 to C-63/13 and C-418/13)] and Marrosu [and Sardino] (C-53/04)? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is the granting of compensation in the amount of between 2,5 and 12 monthly payments of the last overall salary payment (Article 32(5) of Law No 183/2010) to a public employee, who is a victim of the unlawful successive renewal of fixed-term contracts, who may obtain full compensation only by proving the loss of other work opportunities or by proving that, if he had participated in an open competition, he would have been successful, an equivalent and effective measure within the meaning of the judgments of the Court of Justice in Mascolo [and Others (C-22/13, C-61/13 to C-63/13 and C-418/13)] and Marrosu [and Sardino] (C-53/04)?

| 2. | Must the principle of equivalence referred to by the Court of Justice (inter alia) in those judgments, be interpreted as meaning that, when the Member State decides not to apply the conversion of the employment relationship (as awarded in the private sector) to the public sector, it must nevertheless provide the worker with the same benefit, if necessary through compensation which must relate to the value of the employment contract of indefinite duration? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Must the principle of equivalence referred to by the Court of Justice (inter alia) in those judgments, be interpreted as meaning that, when the Member State decides not to apply the conversion of the employment relationship (as awarded in the private sector) to the public sector, it must nevertheless provide the worker with the same benefit, if necessary through compensation which must relate to the value of the employment contract of indefinite duration?

---
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

GEORGE GILMORE : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. :

:

PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICER :

CHARLES LAYTON AND OFFICER :

GOODWIN : NO. 02-4379

ORDER

AND NOW, this day of July, 2003, the Court

finding that:

(a) By order dated July 8, 2002, this Court informed

plaintiff, a prisoner at the State Correctional Institution at

Houtzdale (S.C.I. Houtzdale), that in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §

1915, a prisoner bringing a civil action must pay the full amount

of the $150 filing fee;

(b) Based upon the financial information that

plaintiff submitted to the Court, he was assessed an initial

partial filing fee of $5.70. He was also advised that after the

initial partial filing fee is collected and forwarded to the

Clerk, the Superintendent or other appropriate official at S.C.I.

Houtzdale or any prison at which plaintiff may be incarcerated

will be directed to deduct from plaintiff's prison account, each

time that the balance in plaintiff's inmate trust fund account

exceeds $10, an amount no greater than 20 percent of the money

credited to plaintiff's account during the preceding month and

forward that amount to the Clerk of Court until the filing fee is

paid;

Case 2:02-cv-04379-JG Document 7 Filed 07/02/2003 Page 1 of 3
2

(c) Because plaintiff may not have realized when he

brought this civil action that he is required to pay the filing 

fee, we gave him twenty (20) days to notify the Court whether he 

wished to discontinue this civil action; 

(d) Plaintiff has informed the Court that he wishes to

continue this civil action;

It is therefore ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff, George Gilmore, EM-7340, shall pay the

filing fee of $150; 

2. Plaintiff is assessed an initial partial filing

fee of $5.70. The Superintendent or other appropriate official

at S.C.I Houtzdale or at any prison at which plaintiff may be

incarcerated is directed to deduct $5.70 from plaintiff's inmate

trust fund account, when such funds become available, and forward

that amount to be credited to Civil Action No. 02-4379, to the

following address:

Clerk of the United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, 

601 Market Street, Room 2609, 

Philadelphia, PA 19106 

3. The Superintendent or other appropriate official

at S.C.I. Houtzdale or at any prison at which plaintiff may be

incarcerated shall, after the initial partial filing fee is

collected and until the full filing fee is paid, deduct from

plaintiff's account, each time that plaintiff's inmate trust fund

account exceeds $10, an amount no greater than 20 percent of the

money credited to his account during the preceding month and

Case 2:02-cv-04379-JG Document 7 Filed 07/02/2003 Page 2 of 3
3

forward that amount, to be credited to Civil Action No. 02-4379,

to the address provided above in ¶2; 

4. The Clerk of Court is directed to forward a copy

of this order to the Superintendent of S.C.I. Houtzdale; and

5. The Clerk of Court is directed to REOPEN this case

statistically.

BY THE COURT:

 

JAMES T. GILES, CH. J.

Case 2:02-cv-04379-JG Document 7 Filed 07/02/2003 Page 3 of 3
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 89-3 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 1 of 5
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 89-3 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 2 of 5
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 89-3 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 3 of 5
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 89-3 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 4 of 5
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 89-3 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 5 of 5
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**          I, Christine A. Herren, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of Innotrac Corporation(the “Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 as adopted by § 906 of the Sarbanes-OxleyAct of 2002, that:(1) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 (the“Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.Dated: August 14, 2006         /s/ Christine A. Herren Christine A. Herren      Senior Director and Controller (PrincipalFinancial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)
Case No. 8,986.

#### In re MALCOM.

[4 Law Rep. 488.]

District Court, S. D. New York.

1842.

Baxeruptcy— Informalities ix Petitiox — Signature-Erasures — Schedule xot Definite.

In this case, the application of [Kobert] Malcom for a decree of bankruptcy was opposed on the ground of informality in his petition: 1. Because the name of the petitioner was not signed in full. 2. Because there were erasures and interlineations in the petition. 3. Because the schedule was not sufficiently definite.

BETTS, District Judge,

said that, by the-rule of the court, the petition should be free from erasures, etc., and the name of the petitioner signed in full. If wanting in conformity to these rules, the papers would be-sent back. It was not contemplated by the rule to destroy the merits of an application, unless the sense of the paper was ruined by such erasures and interlineations, or if the papers were grossly imperfect. It is intended to have the papers neatly made out, so that they can readily be read over. In this case, he thought the objections not founded in fact. The petitioner first wrote-his name with the ordinary abbreviation of “Rob’t,” and that was erased and the. name written in full. So with the interlineations in the papers. They were not such as affected the sense of the document, but in some instances rendered it more definite. The court did not think it an infringement of the rule, that one or two small words were interlined in the body of a paper. Another objection is, that the schedule is not sufficiently definite. The party sets out family stores. It is not necessary that the petitioner should set forth a perfect and complete exhibit of every article. But it must be so explicit that the assignee or his agent may be enabled to find the property if necessary. And so with wearing apparel. It is not necessary that every article of clothing should be set out, only it should be-so set forth that the assignee may be enabled to ascertain whether he can claim it or not.
Before the Third Division,

June 23, 1943

No. 48421.

#### Protests 88903-K, etc., of M. Aminoff et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MICHAEL A. COLEMAN : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. :

:

THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, :

et al. : NO. 02-4102

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of July, 2002, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis in

this court is GRANTED and as it appears that plaintiff meant to

file this action in the Western District of Pennsylvania where

the alleged events for which he seeks compensation occurred and

where jurisdiction over those defendants he seeks to enjoin may

be obtained, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the above action is

DISMISSED without prejudice to plaintiff to present his claims in

the Western District of Pennsylvania. 

BY THE COURT:

___________________

JAY C. WALDMAN, J.

Case 2:02-cv-04102-JG Document 3 Filed 07/03/2002 Page 1 of 1
# 2015_06 Pivot Table 4

# Pivot Table by Department

# Table 4

&F	

&P/&N
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**Statement
      of Chief Financial Officer Furnished**


**Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





The
      undersigned, Gary F. Hoskins, is the Chief Financial Officer of Citizens South
      Banking Corporation (the “Company”).





This
      statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the Company of
      the
      Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 (the
“Report”).





By
      execution of this statement, I certify that to the best of my
      knowledge:





A)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d))
                and





B)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company
                as of the dates and for the periods covered by the
                Report.





August
              8, 2007
            
            
            /s/ Gary
              F.
              HoskinsDated
            
            
            Gary
                F. Hoskins
              Chief
                  Financial Officer




This
      statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that
      this
      statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that this statement
      be
      deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to Citizens South Banking Corporation and will be retained
      by Citizens South Banking Corporation and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that on this date, the undersigned served the preceding Motion for Leave

to File A Sur-Reply, including Sur-Reply, upon all parties to this action by depositing a copy

hereof postage prepaid in the United States mail addressed as follows:

Robert P. Brand, Esquire

1200 Walnut Street, 5th Floor

Philadelphia, PA 19107

Anthony Baratta, Esquire

Baratta & Russell, P.C.

The Loft at Mount Jolly

2661 Huntingdon Pike

Huntingdon Valley, PA 19006

Bayard H. Graf, Esquire

Graf & Graf, P.C.

162 Beaumont Road

Devon, PA 19333-1849

 

Date WILLIAM F. MCDEVITT

Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 42-4 Filed 02/19/2003 Page 1 of 1
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

SAP AMERICA, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

WELLOGIX, INC.,

Defendant/Counterclaimant-Appellee

WELLOGIX TECHNOLOGY LICENSING, LLC,

Defendant/Counterclaimant

ACCENTURE LLP,

Counterclaim Defendant

______________________ 

2017-1176

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Southern District of Texas in Nos. 4:10-cv-01224, 4:11-cv02840, Judge Simeon Timothy Lake, III.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

THARAN GREGORY LANIER, Jones Day, Palo Alto, CA, 

argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also represented by 

JOSEPH BEAUCHAMP, HOW-YING ALBERT LIOU, Houston, 
 

TX; ISRAEL SASHA MAYERGOYZ, Chicago, IL; MEGAN S.

WOODWORTH, Venable LLP, Washington, DC.

 RAFFI MELKONIAN, Wright Close & Barger, LLP,

Houston, TX, argued for defendant/counterclaimantappellee. Also represented by RUSSELL HOLLENBECK. 

______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (LOURIE, TARANTO, and CHEN, Circuit 

Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 January 12, 2018 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner 

 Date Peter R. Marksteiner

 Clerk of Court
MIDLANDLOANSERVICES
 

 

March 8, 2001

 

 

Ms. Cynthia Reis		Via UPS

LaSalle Bank National Association	(312) 904-7830
ABS Trust Services Group

135 South LaSalle Street, Suite 1625
Chicago, IL 60603-0000
 

 

Salomon Brothers Mortgage Securities VII, Inc., Commercial Mortgage Pass-

	Through Certificates, Series 2000-C3
Pooling and Servicing Agreement

 

OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

 

 

 

Pursuant****to the requirements of that certain Pooling and Servicing Agreement governing the referenced Trust (the "PSA"), it is hereby certified that (i) the undersigned has completed a review of the servicer's performance of its obligations under the PSA for the preceding calendar year; (ii)to the best of the undersigned's knowledge on the basis of that review the servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the PSA throughout such period in all material respects; (iii) to the best of the undersigned's knowledge, the subservicer, of the servicer under the PSA, if any, has fulfilled its obligations under its sub-servicing agreement in all material respects; and, (iv) no notice has been received from any governmental agency or body which would indicate a challenge or question as to the status of the Trust's qualification as a REMIC under the U.S. Code.

Charles Sipple

Executive Vice President

March 8, 2001

 

A PNC Real Estate Finance Company

210 West 10th Street Kansas City Missouri 64105
www.midlandls.com  816 435 5000T    816 435 2326 F
Opinion issued March 5, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-12-00035-CV

———————————

IN RE AZHAR SAID, PHOENICIAN IMPORTS, INC., RIGIN, INC., 

ABBASID, INC., AND HELIOTECH, INC., Relators

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Relators petitioned for writ of mandamus on January 17, 2012.

1

 On 

November 20, 2012, the Clerk of this Court sent a notice to the parties informing 

them that our records indicated that the petition for writ of mandamus was moot 

and stating that, if they believed the petition for writ of mandamus was not moot, 

 1 The underlying case is Asif Said, et al. v. Azhar Said, et al., No. 0634130 (151st

Dist. Ct., Harris Cnty., Tex.), the Honorable Michael Engelhart, presiding.
2

they were required to file a written response by Monday, December 3, 2012. As of 

February 28, 2013, no response has been received by the Court.

Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.3(c) (providing for involuntary dismissal of civil case for failure to 

comply with notice from clerk requiring response or other action within specified 

time). Any pending motions are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Sharp, and Huddle.