o//o ^cc) 

### E-R, /r$ 3 7 - ~ c .. z/ vo Central Air Workshop

Meeting Evaluation June 30, 1998 1. What isyour overall evaluation ofthis public meeting? Excellent 2 Very Good 7 Good 7 Satisfactory 2 Useless 0 2. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this meeting? Yes, More than I wanted 3 No, Not nearly enough 15 Yes, As much as I wanted No, Not at all 3. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as you wanted? 1 Yes, More than I wanted 3 No, Not nearly enough 14 Yes, As much as I wanted
_ No, Not at all 4. Based on this meeting, what additional steps are needed? (1)TAKE STAKEHOLDER COMMENTS AND ACCEPT ARI SUGGESTIONS (2)NEED ANOTHER WORKSHOP TO RESOLVE ISSUES (3)ACHIEVE CONSENSUS ON ANALYTICAL TOOLS 5. How could we have improved this effort? (1) STAY FOCUSED ON THE IMPORTANT TOPICS (2)FOLLOW THE FRAMEWORK DOCUMENT MORE CLOSELY (3) BETTER ROOM SET-UP 6.Additional comments/suggestions (1)WORK MORE CLOSELY WITH ARI. WALTER MARKOWSKI (2)"PAY BACK" SHOULD NOT BE THE ONLY ISSUE INDETERMINING MINIMUM ENERGY EFFICIENCY STANDARDS. NAME UNKNOWN (3) JIMIS THE WRONG PERSON TO PRESENT TO GROUP. D. LEWIS (4) BE DEMANDING OF STAKEHOLDERS. C. STEPHEN GE-{<..M (S7j)- 

### ct

## t - Lfv,0 (lolfolAn-**~e.)** 

### Central Air Workshop

Meeting Evaluation June 30, 1998 1. What is your overall evaluation ofthis public meeting? Excellent_2 _ Very Good 7 Good---,-7_ Satisfactory 2 Useless_O_ 2. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this meeting?

__ Yes, More than I wanted**~**Yes, As much as I wanted _3 _ No, Not nearly enough

__No, Not at all 3. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as you wanted? 1 Yes, More than I wanted 14 Yes, As much as I wanted _3_No, Not nearly enough

__No, Not at all 4. Based on this meeting, what additional steps are needed? (1) TAKE STAKEHOLDER COMMENTS AND ACCEPT ARI SUGGESTIONS (2) NEED ANOTHERWORKSHOP TO RESOLVE ISSUES (3) ACHIEVE CONSENSUS ON ANALYTICAL TOOLS 5. How could we have improved this effort? (1) STAY FOCUSED ON THE IMPORTANT TOPICS (2) FOLLOW THE FRAMEWORK DOCUMENT MORE CLOSELY (3) BETTERROOM SET-UP 6. Additional comments/suggestions (l)WORK MORE CLOSELY WITH ARI. WALTERMARKOWSKI (2) "PAY BACK" SHOULD NOT BE THF. ONLY ISSUE IN DETERMINING MINIMUM ENERGY EFFICIENCY STANDARDS. NAME UNKNOWN (3) JJM IS THE WRONG PERSON TO PRESENT TO GROUP. D. LEWIS (4) BE DEMANDING OF STAKEHOLDERS. C. STEPHEN



## ...

### EE-RMSTD-98-40 CC-I Central Air Workshop

Meeting Evaluation June 30, 1998 1. What is your overall evaluation ofthis public meeting? Excellent Very Good Good Satisfactory / Useless_ 2. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this meeting? __Yes,

### More than Iwanted _ 

### No, Not ISly enough -- 

## m0 tq'w 0C\ s5sOtheif s 

## I ;- Yes, As much as I wanted No, Not at all 0o -' - Ort 3. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as you wanted? Yes, More than I wanted No, Not nearly enough CYes, As much as I wanted No, Not at all 4. Based on this meeting, what additional steps are needed? 

### WEE pjiU-, ^^ SCUu 

## UDo 4o fl

# r Sjon\ rLifY 

## VX a 

# ibLA h Rf6t< 5. How could we have improved this effort?

6. Additional comments/suggestions

Thankyou for filling outthisevaluation. 

# Jd ) Name (optional) --- --- ---**---~--** EE-RM/STD-88-440 

### Central 

### Air Workshop

Meeting Evaluation June 

### 30, 1998 1. What is your overall evaluation ofthis public meeting?

# SatiSfact01Y~ Excellent Very Good __ Good __ 2. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this meeting? 

## CC-JUseless

__ Yes, More than I wanted tho, Not omty enough"

# 100

# ML\(n+j~ 01\

# sOfrle.1k~ 

# lift

__Yes, As much as I wanted __ No, Not at all

### ~o**+(~**

# 1W

# o1W3. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as you wanted?

__ Yes, More than I wanted**~es,** As much as I wanted __ No, Not nearly enough

__ No, Not at all 4. Based on this meeting, what additional steps are needed? 

### DOE

## f~**~vt~ ~h~~e**  DoE 

## -to 

# flr.,\J 

# srote**+~ ~** **~**

# i**p<~~5i\- ~** **~n\j ~lf,b** **~5 1A~~~e**  5. How could we have improved this effort?

## ~\b{)**'H~ q~**  

# of**-+:~ ~**  

## 1y 5f)M(

## f~oyh**w~ ~e>W~** **~t).%10~**
6. Additional comments/suggestions

Thankyou for filling outthis evaluation. Name (optional)EE-RM/STD-98-440 - CC-2- Central Air Workshop

Meeting Evaluation June 30, 1998 I. What is your overall evaluation ofthis public meeting? Excellent Very Good , Good Satisfactory_ Useless 2. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this meeting?

__ Yes, More than I wanted No, Not nearly enough

tK Yes, As much as I wanted _ No, Not at all 3. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as you wanted? Yes, More than I wanted No, Not nearly enough < Yes, As much as I wanted No, Not at all 4. Based on this meeting, what additional steps are needed? 

### LcS 

## aC \6b) Cor <\| 5. How could we have improved this effort? / gn(:oL s4o- cD '°e Owes1)<D Oerr ' 

### ho t )>< ci 6^~~ <> 6. Additional comments/suggestions

Thankyouforfillingout this evaluation. Name (optional) EE-RM/STD-98-440 - 

### cc,-"7- Central 

### Air Workshop

Meeting Evaluation June 

### 30, 1998 I. What is your overall evaluation ofthis public meeting? Excellent Very

## Good~ Good__ Satisfactory __ 2. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this meeting?

__ Yes, More than I wanted**~** Yes, As much as I wanted __ No, Not nearly enough

__ No, Not at all 3. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as you wanted?

__ Yes, More than I wanted --.:s6....Yes, As much as I wanted __ No, Not nearly enough

__ No, Not at all 4. Based on this meeting, what additional steps are needed?

5. How could we have improved this effort? 

## 1-!G..y\/)oV-...+ 

# --:s-ho"",kD



# ()?J-t: t.**~~** 

## /) d2v.y . 6. Additional comments/suggestions

Thankyoufor filling outthis evaluation. Useless

Name (optional)EE-RM/STD-98-440 CC. Central Air Workshop

Meeting Evaluation June 30, 1998 I. What isyour overall evaluation ofthis public meeting? Excellent _ Very Good_ Good_ Satisfactory_ Useless 2. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this meeting? Yes, More than I wanted No, Not nearly enough

-- Yes, As much as I wanted No, Not at all 3. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as you wanted?

__ Yes, More than I wanted No, Not nearly enough /Y"es, As much as I wanted No, Not at all 4. Based on this meeting, what additional steps are needed?
5. How could we have improved this effort?

6. Additional comments/suggestions

Thankyoufor filling out thisevaluation. Name (optional) EE-RM/STD-98-440 

### Central Air Workshop

Meeting Evaluation June 30, 1998 1. What is your overall evaluation ofthis public meeting? Excellent Very Good __ Good__ Satisfactory V 2. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this meeting?

__ Yes, More than I wanted**~**es, As much as I wanted __ No, Not nearly enough

__ No, Not at all 3. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as you wanted?

__ Yes, More than I wanted

.**~es,** As much as I wanted __ No, Not nearly enough

__ No, Not at all 4. Based on this meeting, what additional steps are needed?

5. How could we have improved this effort?

6. Additional comments/suggestions

Thankyou for.filling outthis evaluation. Useless __

Name (optional)EE-RM/STD-98-440 - C-j' 

### Central Air Workshop

Meeting Evaluation June 30, 1998 1. What isyour overall evaluation ofthis public meeting? Excellent Very Good-'/ Good_ Satisfactory_ Useless 2. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this meeting?

_ Yes, More than I wanted _ No, Not nearly enough ._ Yes, As much as I wanted _ No, Not at all 3. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as you wanted? _Yes, More than I wanted No, Not nearly enough

_ Yes, As much as I wanted wNo, Not at all 4. Based on this meeting, atdditional ss e needed? 

# 6 4R , ,At~ As. 

### ' I 5. How could we have improved this effort? ,

6. Additional comments/suggestions 

# ta ji~j < ART
Thankyou for filling outthis evaluation. Name (optional) · EE-RM/STD-98-440 - 

# cc..r c4 Central Air

### Workshop

Meeting Evaluation June 30, 1998 1. What is your overall evaluation ofthis public meeting? Excellent

### VeryGood~ Good__ Satisfactory __ 2. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this meeting?

__ Yes, More than I wanted 

# -*Yes, As much as I wanted __ No, Not nearly enough

__ No, Not at all 3. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as you wanted?

__ Yes, More than I wanted

__ Yes, As much as I wanted __ No, Not nearly enough +No, Not at all Useless

4. Based on this meeting,

# ~ needed?

## (~ 

# . '.**~** 

# a-vS

# r**R-.d-~**

# ~~i~~·~L~ 5. How could we have improved this

# effort?~'**~ ~.** **~1L~~,,-~~.~**

# ~ 

# -6- 

# p-ir-th**~.** 6. Additional comments/suggestions

# tJ~~~ Thankyou for filling outthis evaluation. 

## WAL:,tr..,. MA(\l(OW5 

## KI Name (optional)EE-RM/STD.9 8-440 - 

### Central Air Workshop

Meeting Evaluation June 30, 1998 1. What is your overall evaluation ofthis public meeting? Excellent _ Very Good _ Good Satisfactory_ Useless 2. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this meeting? __Yes, More than I wanted No, Not nearly enough l/Yes, As much as I wanted No, Not at all 3. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as you wanted?

_ Yes, More than I wanted _L No, Not nearly enough

_ Yes, As much as I wanted No, Not at all 4. Based on this meeting, what additional steps are needed?
5. How could we have improved this effort? 

### Tage -oov 

### S0m eP 4aS 

### VCry 

### f:of. 

# fo4

0 

## , 

# i W1c 

# d 1 

# S-;C3⁄4Ltl ior Aose 

## io 6. Additional comments/suggestions

Thankyoufor flling outthisevaluation. Oame (opti - -**~-~--~----------** EE-RM/STO-98-440 __ 

## e"C-**~** 

### Central 

### Air Workshop

Meeting Evaluation June 

### 30, 1998 1. What is your overall evaluation ofthis public meeting? Excellent Very Good __ Good 

# V Satisfactory_>_ 2. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this meeting?

__ Yes, More than I wanted**~Yes,** As much as I wanted __ No, Not nearly enough

__ No, Not at all 3. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as you wanted?

__ Yes, More than I wanted

__ Yes, As much as I wanted**~o,** Not nearly enough

__ No, Not at all 4. Based on this meeting, what additional steps are needed?

# ~ 5. How could we have improved this effort? 

# The \OOvY\ 

## se£U.f> WQ5. 

# ve,( p6or_ Useless __



## Hoi

# Siu.~~J**dl'-t+-l'~LLlt:** 

# +or**~05e** Ifloi J 

# aT 

# fh..e. i-a

# b Ie Zo 

# fa.. \ 

# -t**('~**

# (PCL-t{

## ~ 6. Additional comments/suggestions

Thankyou for filling outthis evaluation.EE-RM/STD-98-440 - CC

### Central Air Workshop

Meeting Evaluation June 30, 1998 1. What is your overall evaluation ofthis public meeting? Excellent_ Very Good_ Good_ Satisfactory_ Useless 2. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this meeting? Yes, More than I wanted > No, Not nearly enough Yes, As much as I wanted No, Not at all 3. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as you wanted?

_ Yes, More than I wanted No, Not nearly enough )c Yes, As much as I wanted No, Not at all 4. Based on this meeting, what additional steps are needed? 

## Wuc Ptoeo 0 

# CWOJTO <3Va5 

## weaT &-,t?. 5. How could we have improved this effort? COOXKJA^: pR£ Sasy *k3 O/ tWeswe ft"enAf 6. Additional comments/suggestions 

## < M

## \<> rion pe"z 

## perStt \ mW Thankyoufor filling outthis evaluation. Name (optional)**~-----------** -- -- - ---- ------------ EE-RM/STD-98-440 -**c..c-~** 

### Central Air 

### Workshop

Meeting Evaluation June 30, 1998 1. What is your overall evaluation ofthis public meeting? Excellent Very Good __ GoodX Satisfactory __ 2. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this meeting?

__ Yes, More than I wanted

__Yes, As much as I wanted**~No,** Not nearly enough

__ No, Not at all 3. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as you wanted?

__ Yes, More than I wanted**~**Yes, As much as I wanted __ No, Not nearly enough

__ No, Not at all 4. Based on this meeting, what additional steps are needed?

5. How could we have improved this effort?

6. Additional comments/suggestions 

## .L**~L'**5

### ftl~~~-- Useless



## .J ltY\

## \~**Wf~ ~f'(\** \'D

## ~f-ebev::}\**~ ~** 

## ~**~** \t)\'-')0<,rvJ't'\ 

### 'JS.

## ~,,~**~u..e6~~** Thankyou for filling outthis evaluation. Name (optional)EE-RM/STD-9-440- C.- 

### Central Air Workshop

Meeting Evaluation June 30, 1998 1. What is your overall evaluation ofthis public meeting? 

### Excellent _ Very Good f < 

### Good_ Satisfactory_ Useless 2. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this meeting? Yes, More than I wanted No, Not nearly enough QYes, As much as I wanted No, Not at all 3. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as you wanted? Yes, More than I wanted No, Not nearly enough X)Yes, As much as I wanted No, Not at all 4. Based on this meeting, what additional steps are needed? ? Chsb>6l to sE /}^i^, Lxua, 1 xt^^o^l <r 5. How could we have improved this effort? Ae . Srrt, roR. P tUcc-oFro friR F tGr i wI' vwjws Co-fm (aGoJ> . > cr 98 4rme f-AMd,. 6. Additional comments/suggestions



### "ypu~z >< a 

### Q<, 

## i ,n 6H~-Jau,^ A 

### a9i Q cfrvm Li3NLThank you for filling outthis evaluation. 

### b. qc, ed(. . C Na e (option 

### Naine (optional) ·EE-RM/STD-98-440·-

### C-6-~ 

### Central Air

### Workshop

Meeting Evaluation June 30, 1998 1. What is your overall evaluation ofthis public meeting? Excellent**VeryGood~** Good__ Satisfactory __ 2. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this meeting?

__ Yes, More than I wanted**~** Yes, As much as I wanted __ No, Not nearly enough

__ No, Not at all 3. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as you wanted?

__ Yes, More than I wanted 

### ---Xl.Yes, As much as I wanted __ No, Not nearly enough

__ No, Not at all 4. Based on this meeting, what additional steps are needed? Useless



### -X**~Qwf7J ~v<::.** **~** 

## V:"tt 1e. A 

### tu...st.& 

### dor**~tl~V** 

### wekkf 

## 10**~oIv~ ~** **Jr~~~rk,** 

## 11Z.-oeJUx)**~StA.IW I'~'~** 

## ~.**Cht.,.~~ev- ~\s** **I)~fi!\c±.r"** Lee:.

## ~~~~**1Y)?~t** 5. How could we have improved this effort?**~.ess ~**  J

6. Additional comments/suggestions**~~ .st).,..~)**  

## o::::r 9<a -1-/;"e.JrdM'L . 

### j ...

## &.vna;-,J,..:~ 

## .of**~** 

## /**~14t ~&~~.** **-r~** \NM 

## a. 

# Qg+-**~5 Of'vl1.-~aVI~~**  

### .tUt.& 

## dl.s..tl'"Z'iuh.:.Z3 

## rfr-r.m Li3/1/L

### ~ J 'sfIt,V¥,'

### ~ZfX}~

### (cl:.. J

### e.speG/~ 

## whst.n**f)1-;;,~.fJI;'** 

### '':'0 fJ,&r 0","10-

### ftl~**2Z~ In1fx;;:....ssi~_**  

## w,'-H..t::.lA-f f("f::.cJ .... .-

### &,~,,.J.ar.l SIAc.J... A.sre...-t:I::"'"tS

### .rh.~~ 

### 'J Thankyou fOT fillillg outthis ""aJuoJion. 

### b<.**~+e&.** 

# C .**~~s-** . N e (optional)EE.RM/STD-98-440 - CC - 

### Central Air Workshop

Meeting Evaluation June 30, 1998 1. What isyour overall evaluation ofthis public meeting? Excellent_\ Very Good Good_ Satisfactory_ Useless_ 2. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this meeting? Yes, More than I wanted No, Not nearly enough 

# LI Yes, As much as I wanted _ No, Not at all 3. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as you wanted? Yes, More than I wanted No, Not nearly enough ' Yes, As much asI wanted No, Not at all 4. Based on this meeting, what additional steps are needed?
5. How could we have improved this effort? It -XC< j~r zlc. c^ c<) ^ z~~ '- -- 

### -i
6. Additional comments/suggestions

Thankyoufor filling outthis evaluation. 

### /Name (optional) EE-RM/STO-9S-440 - 

## C. C. -

### ~ Central Air Workshop

Meeting Evaluation June 30, 1998 1. What is your overall evaluation ofthis public meeting?

## Excellent~ . Very Good__ Good__ Satisfactory __ 2. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this meeting? Yes, More than I wanted 

# s= Yes, As much as I wanted· __ No, Not nearly enough

__ No, Not at all 3. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as you wanted? Yes, More than I wanted

### ~Yes, As much as I wanted __ No, Not nearly enough

__ No, Not at all 4. Based on this meeting, what additional steps are needed?

### C~~~_~~~~

## d~d~ 5. How could we have improved this effort? Useless



# "c:JJ!lJ?c.**~** eX

## $~v-.r-t.**@~ ~** **~** 

# '1**~** --cr-v--.Q/

# ~..e ,. 6. Additional comments/suggestions

## ~2>':"Z<r~**~~~~** Thankyou for filling outthis evaluation.

# ~J=--9 Name (optional)EE.RM/STD-98-440- C-C/ 

### Central Air Workshop

Meeting Evaluation June 30, 1998 1. What is your overall evaluation ofthis public meeting? Excellent Very Good _ Good Satisfactory+/4 Useless 2. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this meeting? Yes, More than I wanted YNo, Not nearly enough

_ Yes, As much as I wanted No, Not at all 3. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as you wanted? _Yes, More than I wanted o, Not nearly enough Yes, As much as I wanted __ No, Not at all 4. Based on this meeting, what additional steps are needed?
5. How could we have improved this effort?

- - w 6. Additional ommen suggestions

-
Thankyou forfilling outthis evaluation. Name (optional) .EE-RM/STD-98-440

### ~**c.-~**

# -**~** Central 

### Air Workshop

Meeting Evaluation June 

### 30, 1998 I. What is your overall evaluation ofthis public meeting? Excellent Very Good __ Good__ Satisfactory

### ~ Useless 2. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this meeting?

__ Yes, More than I wanted Yes, As much as I wanted --XNo, Not nearly enough

__ No, Not at all 3. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as you wanted?

__ Yes, More than I wanted

__ Yes, As much as I wanted**~o,** Not nearly enough

__ No, Not at all

Name (optional)EE-RM/STD-98-440 CC

### Central Air Workshop

Meeting Evaluation June 30, 1998 1. What is your overall evaluation ofthis public meeting? Excellent Very Good _ Good Satisfactory_ Useless 2. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this meeting? ytes, More than I wanted _ No, Not nearly enough

_ 1 Yes, As much as I wanted No, Not at all 3. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as you wanted? /Yes, More than I wanted _ No, Not nearly enough

_ Yes, As much as I wanted No, Not at all 4. Based on this meeting, what additional steps are needed?
5. How could we have improved this effort? 

# w ',wJR1re 6tWi ^w6. Additional comments/suggestions

Thankyou forfilling out this evaluation. Name (optional) EE-RM/STD-98-440- 

## c..,c.,-c:!2, Central 

### Air Workshop

Meeting Evaluation 

### June 30, 1998 1. What is your overall evaluation ofthis public meet7' Excellent__ Very Good__ Good__ Satisfactory __ 2. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this meeting?**~s,** More than I wanted

__**~Yes,** As much as I wanted __ No, Not nearly enough

__ No, Not at all 3. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as you wanted? /Yes, More than I wanted / __ 'Yes, As much as I wanted __ No, Not nearly enough

__ No, Not at all 4. Based on this meeting, what additional steps are needed?

5. How could we have improved this effort? 

# "-etf**~**VJJ1J

# ~y\ tlL

# l**~** tMDlft

# fpwm 6. Additional comments/suggestions Useless

# ~~~.~~**~** )

# r'Uj~**~~~~** Thankyou for filling outthis evaluation. Name (optional)EE-RM/STD-98-440 - 

### Central Air Workshop

Meeting Evaluation June 30, 1998 1. What is your overall evaluation ofthis public meeting? Excellent Very Good Good Satisfactory_ Useless 2. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this meeting? Yes, More than I wanted _No, Not nearly enough 2 Yes, As much as I wanted No, Not at all 3. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as you wanted? Yes, More than I wanted No, Not nearly enough ,C Yes, As much as I wanted No, Not at all 4. Based on this meeting, what additional steps are needed?
5. How could we have improved this effort?

6. Additional comments/suggestions

Thankyouforfilling outthis evaluation. Name (optional) EE-RM/STD-98-440 - 

### CC-c:{ 

### Central Air 

### Workshop

Meeting Evaluation June 30, 1998 I. What is your overall evaluation ofthis public meeting? Excel1ent Very Good__ GOOdA Satisfactory __ 2. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this meeting? Yes, More than I wanted 

## X Yes, As much as I wanted __ No, Not nearly enough

__ No, Not at all 3. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as you wanted?

__ Yes, More than I wanted -AYes, As much as I wanted __ No, Not nearly enough

__ No, Not at all 4. Based on this meeting, what additional steps are needed?

5. How could we have improved this effort?

6. Additional comments/suggestions

Thankyou for filling outthis evaluation. Useless

Name (optional)EE-RM/STD-98-440- C C 

### Central Air Workshop

Meeting Evaluation June 30, 1998 1. What is your overall evaluation ofthis public meeting? Excellent Very Good _ Good / Satisfactory_ Useless 2. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this meeting? Yes, More than I wanted No, Not nearly enough / Yes, As much as I wanted No, Not at all 3. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as you wanted?

_ Yes, More than I wanted No, Not nearly enough JYes, As much as I wanted No, Not at all 4. Base on this meeting, what additional steps are needed?
e

d 

# S 0 j rJe 

# WA DAi 

### r 5. How could we have improved this effort? cd9J I, 7 i/-f /( / / 7A /ii / /'t, i4 p- 7< 

### Al Or, 4&cLI tZ C4L/

## ii

# /lo etoCl //D X 6rarn C 

### IdLSd// A) 

## 1⁄2iz XJtJo : 4 e nJz 6.Additional comments/suggestions

Thankyouforfilling outthis evaluation. 

### /ame (ooptonal) EE-RM/STD-98-440- C

### ~ -

### ~ 

### Central Air Workshop

Meeting Evaluation June 30, 1998 1. What is your overall evaluation ofthis public meeting? Excellent Very Go0d __ Good / Satisfactory __ 2. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this meeting?

__ Yes, More than I wanted 

## -LYes, As much as I wanted __ No, Not nearly enough

__ No, Not at all 3. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as you wanted? Yes, More than I wanted /Yes, As much as I wanted

Thankyou for filling outthis evaluation. __ No, Not nearly enough

__ No, Not at all UselessEE-RM/STD-98-440 - CC , 

### Central Air Workshop

Meeting Evaluation June 30, 1998 1. What isyour overall evaluation ofthis public meeting? Excellent_ Very Good___ Good Satisfactory_ Useless 2. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this meeting? Yes, More than I wanted No, Not nearly enough tYes, As much as I wanted No, Not at all 3. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as you wanted? Yes, More than I wanted No, Not nearly enough / Yes, As much as I wanted No, Not at all 4. Based on this meeting, what additional steps are needed?
5. How could we have improved this effort?

6. Additional comments/suggestions

Thankyou forfilling outthis evaluation. Name (optional) EE-RM/STD-9S-440- 

### 6C....**~** 

### Central Air Workshop

Meeting Evaluation June 30, 1998 1. What is your overall evaluation ofthis public meeting? Excellent Very Good

### ~**Good~** Satisfactory __ 2. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this meeting? Yes, More than I wanted 

## Vv es, As much as I wanted __ No, Not nearly enough

__ No, Not at all 3. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as you wanted?**~s,** More than I wanted**_~_** YYe

es, As much as I wanted __ No, Not nearly enough

__ No, Not at all 4. Based on this meeting, what additional steps are needed?


# .O-h ..d;" 

# /<ud-y
5. How could we have improved thisyffort? 

## /10 re. 

## c...kr-;

## 'tS**~** 

## --fk5 U/i-ff

## ~/.Ih!-r;s/**~-h-x.L** 6. Additional comments/suggestions

Thankyou for filling outthis evaluation. Useless

Name (optional)EE-RM/STD-98-440- CC - 

### Central Air Workshop

Meeting Evaluation June 30, 1998 1. What is your overall evaluation ofthis public meeting? Excellent Very Good" Good_ Satisfactory_ Useless 2. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this meeting? Yes, More than I wanted No, Not nearly enough ~I Yes, As much as I wanted No, Not at all 3. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as you wanted? Yes, More than I wanted No, Not nearly enough ~_Yes, As much as I wanted _ No, Not at all 4. Based on this meeting, what additional steps are needed?
5. How could we have improved this effort?

6. Additional comments/suggestions

Thankyoufor fillingout this evaluation. Name (optional) EE-RM/STD-98-440- 

## CC ...**~** Central Air 

### Workshop

Meeting Evaluation June 

### 30, 1998 1. What is your overall evaluation ofthis public meeting? Excellent

### VeryGood~ Good__ Satisfactory __ 2. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this meeting? Yes, More than I wanted**~** Yes, As much as I wanted __ No, Not nearly enough

__ No, Not at all 3. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as you wanted?

__ Yes, More than I wanted 

# -*Yes, As much as I wanted __ No, Not nearly enough

__ No, Not at all 4. Based on this meeting, what additional steps are needed?

5. How could we have improved this effort?

## ~~
6. Additional comments/suggestions

Thankyoufor filling outthis evaluation. Useless

Name (optional)EE-RM/STD-98-440- C--C 

### Central Air Workshop

Meeting Evaluation June 30, 1998 1. What is your overall evaluation ofthis public meeting? Excellent Very Good / Good Satisfactory_ Useless 2. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this meeting? Yes, More than I wanted No, Not nearly enough 

# J- Yes, As much as I wanted No, Not at all 3. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as you wanted? Yes, More than I wanted No, Not nearly enough / Yes, As much as I wanted _ No, Not at all 4. Based on this meeting, what additional steps are needed?

5. How could we have improved this effort?

6. Additional comments/suggestions


### Thankyouforfilling outthisevaluation. Mf / rp 

# jj Name (optional) EE-RM/STD-98-440 - CC....

## 4 Central AirWorkshop

Meeting Evaluation June 

### 30, 1998 1. What is your overall evaluation ofthis public meeting? Excellent Very Good--.i: Good__ Satisfactory __ 2. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this meeting? Yes, More than I wanted / Yes, As much as I wanted _. _No, Not nearly enough

__ No, Not at all 3. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as you wanted? Yes, More than I wanted 

# ""1..Yes, As much as I wanted __ No, Not nearly enough _,_No, Not at all 4. Based on this meeting, what additional steps are needed?

5. How could we have improved this effort?

6. Additional comments/suggestions .

. Thankyou for filling outthis evaluation. Useless

Name (optional)EE-RM/STD-98-440 -COC

### Central Air Workshop

Meeting Evaluation June 30, 1998 1. What is your overall evaluation ofthis public meeting? Excellent Very Good Good /' Satisfactory, Useless 2. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this meeting? Yes, More than I wanted / No, Not nearly enough Yes, As much as I wanted No, Not at all 3. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as you wanted?

__ Yes, More than I wanted No, Not nearly enough //Yes, As much as I wanted No, Not at all 4. Based on this meeting, what additional steps are needed? 

### i4c4i t CQ 

### (Queu ac, Dock,; 5. How could we have improved this effort? $ - /f(oczuX XYji / rcveL(gofbc9Jk 

### dcCA ,. 4 c(Aoj
6.Additional comments/suggestions zOc)i- (s24icQ t> s<- t 

### ( <--j( Thankyou for filling outthis evaluation. Name (optional) -- ----- ----- EE-RM/STD-98-440 -**Q.c...,-~** 

### Central Air Workshop·

Meeting Evaluation June 30, 1998 1. What is your overall evaluation ofthis public meeting? Excellent Very Good __**Good~** Satisfactory**~** 

### , 2. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this meeting?

__ Yes, More than I wanted

__Yes, As much as I wanted 

## -.L No, Not nearly enough'

__ No, Not at all 3. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as**yo~** wanted? Yes, More than I wanted**~**es, As much as I wanted __ No, Not nearly enough No, Not at all ..----



### . 4. Based on this meeting, what additional steps are needed? 

### !1/AC177-**~e /l~** **~7** 

## DoCXd_ Useless

5. How could we have**improv~** this effort?

## ~**~(rou..;(~.** fJ..e from.eWOJl('c/'oc(;. M6)IIr-.f--

## M~_ c

## (O.~.
6. Additional comments/sugge.stions 

### f)a..,-fe-**b~v-lcO. ~~**  c;>

### ~~vv--, -H-c:-c:fJ

### (~~ ('7

### ~**~**J- )

### o..~\~oJ;Q.~ 

## \,. ') 

# d (l,7.r 

### c-cf,' S 

### t..-£. vV' , 

## rf-J fa**(}s2-~**

J . Thankyou for filling outthis evaluation. Name (optional)EE-RM/STD-98-440 - O. -? 

### Central Air Workshop

Meeting Evaluation June 30, 1998 1. What is your overall evaluation ofthis public meeting? Excellent Very Good Good Satisfactory Useless 2. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this meeting? / Yes, More than I wanted _ No, Not nearly enough Yes, As much as I wanted No, Not at all 3. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as you wanted? i Yes, More than I wanted _ No, Not nearly enough k_ Yes, As much as I wanted No, Not at all 4. Based on this meeting, what additional steps are needed? /^^20v) T ^ Ad A d o TV 4C7 <F A/4 t6;.g5', fit R/ C8^^ ^ ^ Su L DZ C > £ /' As' M, A: 97- our Ad ,72W1 a d+ r/I^ /v<_ 5. How could we have improved this effort? a'r/ 

### pCn^^ o^ 7p 

# / /iPvsm 

# ago P7 -/> 7g 

### a° -R fo . >ir&nr f^AP~ ^ u Lo r ^ /^^r7lTJ/^ Ad An 6. Additional comments/suggestions LftDL 06L /X1 A- Ao BeIA CW4 y 

### eA LThankyouforfilling out thisevaluation Name (optional) EE-RM/STD-9B-440 - C-c...-d:? 

### Central Air

### Workshop

Meeting Evaluation June 

### 30, 1998 1. What is your overall evaluation ofthis public meeting? Exceilent__ Very

# GOOd~ Good_. _ Satisfactory __ Useless __ 2. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this meeting? 

## --L Yes, More than I wanted**~** Yes, As much as I wanted __ No, Not nearly enough

__ No, Not at all 3. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as you wanted? Yes, More than I wanted 

# dYes, As much as I wanted __ No, Not nearly enough

__ No, Not at all 4. Based on this meeting, what additional steps are needed?

### tf.uo~l/t" vJ/hn'" TlfIt,

### ~ 

## 11>fA C

### 'I CUILL.- Go (,Iell- 1flJJ>

### wlfF~**~tJAJ**j t,.J'lA--

### ~ flJ71>

### ~ )rc-ce/T 

### ifLr

### .>"u~"1u.J. tiP Va**CGf?W~** 

## n;£- /(./bL- .£tLul/,A€:;Jr )u£'**~** kJ/o**/~a.r;** n;.J]J I)v<-, t<1ffJ'rr**ft1>7U~M** (/6- 1-#j(!Itf&..A07fo**~y I'~**  IfJ**/:J~** IN**S'~,** 5. How could we have improved this effort?

### J~ f7; Cl.u:G-iJ

### ~.J5 

### '1JI-e. /MI''()/l,TJhJ/ 'JdjlIC"s - - 

### 'J:>wJI/ -.J J;e'f TO Pt1J6i+

### ~#6:M/-./f7Tt;AB J?I";trr 

### 117rvE- ur-rt--G

### ~/Z.,



### ';0 /tI/.;e:lf-x.JdAJIlr) 6L

## Al'r~ 71 1Ji) T (!.e, /NS"c-/t.uJ7Hj 4f:., 

### ¥ /0 

# r/lOf3 I 

### R- )A-.7I-' LLS.£;lJI 6. Additional comments/suggestions jlr>LJ>**fk.f:brlv~** IIJ k ,IZoo;.A W IT)./-'**13~** CLt;VlA-'71C; U>J..J**~C**
Thankyou for filling outthis evaluation.

### ~ 

### (AuL Name (optional)EE-RM/STD-98-440- (CC

### Central Air Workshop

Meeting Evaluation June 30, 1998 1. What is your overall evaluation ofthis public meeting? Excellent Very Good Good.. Satisfactory__ Useless 2. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this meeting? Yes, More than I wanted No, Not nearly enough ,, Yes, As much as I wanted No, Not at all 3. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as you wanted?

j1Yes, More than I wanted No, Not nearly enough Yes, As much as Iwanted No, Not at all 4. Based on this meeting, what additional steps are needed? 0 Age-d 

## .t 4a 4Out 5 o o - t A;} 4eJ" o 6)*/7>7/ /ISves y^,,^/ 352,,5 oC 5. How cpuld we have improved this effort? 6 

### s'iAo/e s/ , ct o 

### d c i 6. Additional comments/suggestions

Thankyouforfilling outthis evaluation. Name (optional) EE-RM/STD-98-44o-**~C-~** 

### Central Air Workshop.

Meeting Evaluation June 30, 1998 1. What is your overall evaluation ofthis public meeting? Excellent Very Good __**Good~** Satisfactory __ 2. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this meeting? Yes, More than I wanted 

## X Yes, As much as I wanted __ No, Not nearly enough

__ No, Not at all 3. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as you wanted?**~**es, More than I wanted

__ Yes, As much as I wanted __ No, Not nearly enough

__ No, Not at all Useless __

4. Based on this meeting, what additional steps are needed? is pel!-& 

### h**~~ ~** **~f,.-,y /o~~&i**  

### "')**~** 

## d q 

## I Y-a

I/hp//n.,;n.e-r« 

### ou-J- .In "'\) /) ("' /55**~e** s:., t..-V_

### I.J- /

### -:5**3~o....., ~**  

### s 0 

### r

### /hC>v~**6..e~ "71~~/--7ffS**  tA..)')//0""/9 

# d r

## 75 Itt /5- ou--:J-/ 5. How cpuld we have improved this effort? .**r'-e~** . - 

## JJeJ ct 

### f.v6 d", 

### I**r7e~f,:>** 

## h Jet c 

### k 

# oH!-t? /$

### tf?rt>c.e~ ..

### T~/n(JG-A. 

### ftna-e..-**5~+-** .o")

### ~**1(~/\/eJ~** 

### ,krn....5**~-J-.** 

### 5JtDVId.k

### /D-z,~ &. 

# -I- dO?>Ai

### ~ r-oc:;.d .. · 6. Additional comments/suggestions

Thankyou for filling outthis evaluation. Name (optional)EE.RM/STD-98-440- CC

- 

### Central Air Workshop

Meeting Evaluation June 30, 1998 1. What is your overall evaluation ofthis public meeting? Excellent _ Very Good/Good Satisfactory_ Useless 2. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this meeting? Yes, More than I wanted No, Not nearly enough X 

### Yes, As much as Iwanted No, Not at all 3. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as you wanted? Yes, More than Iwanted No, Not nearly enough , Yes, As much as I wanted No, Not at all 4. Based on this meeting, what additional steps are needed?

- ,A -'"~ ,.c,/? 7 ~ *TZ,- FC7~ C4&/^iy, -, c'C3-6,'

- ,/4-4A oU7 g '& 4/ /D64 /P/g 5. How could we have improved this effort?

- 

# A^- A H C l46z o-~ '7-I. c - ~ 

### /
6. Additional comments/suggestions R ~ /o/- 6f(G All,:^i F ^ /^aCf C / -7-0 PA C- t F
Thank you forfilling outthis evaluation. Name (optional) EE-RM/STO-9S-440- e.G

## -~ Central Air

### Workshop

Meeting Evaluation June 30, 1998 1. What is your overall evaluation ofthis public meeting? Excellent Very

# GOOd;i.. Good__ Satisfactory __ 2. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this meeting? Yes, More than I wanted 

# X Yes, As much as I wanted __ No, Not nearly enough

__ No, Not at all 3. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as you wanted? Yes, More than I wanted**~**Yes, As much as I wanted __ No, Not nearly enough

__ No, Not at all 4. Based on this meeting, what additional steps are needed? Useless

-**/.~'-'IS** (; 

### 4 I'VA'L. YJI

### S /'::>**//f~E- l/4/£~koL;;J~** **CD~~c'-"-TS** ( /V

# ro A-e:.c.. OV,A./T.

-**/J~-4J<::.** oVT 

## ,(c r {"**1I~.tJ** /If,fT ;tJc.--"".utt:JJ 5. How could we have improved this effort? 

## f:.-**E~** jJGo-""'Ll:**~c**vf 6::J 0..-.." rz:;'/ t'c6. Additional comments/suggestions**·~O..,A-(**
. ,/
Thankyou for filling outthis evaluation. Name (optional)EE-RM/STD-98-440- .- C = 

### Central Air Workshop

Meeting Evaluation June 30, 1998. 1. What is your overall evaluation ofthis public meeting? Excellent_ Very Good Good_ Satisfactory_ Useless 2. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this meeting? Yes, More than I wanted _ No, Not nearly enough '" Yes, As much as I wanted _ No, Not at all 3. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as you wanted? Yes, More than I wanted No, Not nearly enough 'Yes, As much as I wanted No, Not at all 4. Based onthis meeting, what additional steps are needed?
5. How could we have improved this effort?

6. Additional comments/suggestions



### *$ 

### do i4 L FIt 

### Mu ^ laid 

### O& 

# 'L^ ^^ Ca o r 

# d r Thankyou forfilling outthis evaluation. Name (optional) -- -- - - -- -- - \// EE-RM/STD-98-440- 

### C,C,-

### ~ 

### Central Air

### Workshop

Meeting Evaluation June 30, 1998· 1. What is your overall evaluation ofthis public meeting? Excellent 

# V Very Good__ Good__ Satisfactory __ 2. Were your priority issues adequately discussed during this meeting?

__ Yes, More than I wanted**~** Yes, As much as I wanted __ No, Not nearly enough

__ No, Not at all 3. Did you have an opportunity to participate as much as you wanted? Yes, More than I wanted ZYes, As much as I wanted __ No, Not nearly enough

__ No, Not at all 4. Based on this meeting, what additional steps are needed?

5. How could we have improved this effort? Useless __

Name (optional)