alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1456 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1456

To provide that human life shall be deemed to begin with fertilization.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 28, 2017

  Mr. Strange introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
               referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To provide that human life shall be deemed to begin with fertilization.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Sanctity of Human Life Act''.

SEC. 2. DECLARATION.

    In the exercise of the powers of the Congress, including Congress' 
power under article I, section 8 of the Constitution, to make necessary 
and proper laws, and Congress' power under section 5 of the 14th 
article of amendment to the Constitution of the United States--
            (1) the Congress declares that--
                    (A) the right to life guaranteed by the 
                Constitution is vested in each human being, and is the 
                paramount and most fundamental right of a person; and
                    (B) the life of each human being begins with 
                fertilization, cloning, or its functional equivalent, 
                irrespective of sex, health, function or disability, 
                defect, stage of biological development, or condition 
                of dependency, at which time every human being shall 
                have all the legal and constitutional attributes and 
                privileges of personhood; and
            (2) the Congress affirms that the Congress, each State, the 
        District of Columbia, and all United States territories have 
        the authority to protect the lives of all human beings residing 
        in its respective jurisdictions.

SEC. 3. DEFINITIONS.

    For purposes of this Act:
            (1) Fertilization.--The term ``fertilization'' means the 
        process of a human spermatozoan penetrating the cell membrane 
        of a human oocyte to create a human zygote, a one-celled human 
        embryo, which is a new unique human being.
            (2) Cloning.--The term ``cloning'' means the process called 
        somatic cell nuclear transfer, that combines an enucleated egg 
        and the nucleus of a somatic cell to make a human embryo.
            (3) Human; human being.--The terms ``human'' and ``human 
        being'' include each and every member of the species homo 
        sapiens at all stages of life, beginning with the earliest 
        stage of development, created by the process of fertilization, 
        cloning, or its functional equivalent.
                                 <all>
```
No. 62456.

#### Ellis Silver Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 146509-K (New York).

*407Opinion by

For», J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of candlesticks and candelabras similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 62036, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

TUNG MA : CIVIL ACTION

:

 v. :

:

KENNETH D. KYLER, et al. : NO. 02-4380

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of August, 2002, it is hereby ORDERED that the

respondent District Attorney for Philadelphia County shall file a specific and detailed

answer pursuant to Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United

States District Courts which is responsive to the petition for a writ of habeas corpus. 

The respondent’s answer, together with a memorandum of law, shall be filed within

thirty (30) days of the date of this order.

BY THE COURT:

 

DIANE M. WELSH

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:02-cv-04380-PBT Document 3 Filed 08/13/2002 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

TUNG MA : CIVIL ACTION

:

 v. :

:

KENNETH D. KYLER, et al. : NO. 02-4380

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of August, 2002, it is hereby ORDERED that 

the Clerk of the Quarter Sessions of the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County

shall file with the Clerk of this Court copies of the record including notes of testimony at

pre-trial proceedings, at trial, sentencing, suppression hearings, post conviction

hearings, all petitions, motions, opinions, briefs of the State Court in the abovecaptioned matter within thirty (30) days from the date of this order. The Common Pleas

Court Caption is as follows: Commonwealth v. Tung Ma, March 1996 Term, No. 473.

BY THE COURT:

 

DIANE M. WELSH

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:02-cv-04380-PBT Document 3 Filed 08/13/2002 Page 2 of 2
Opinion issued July 23 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals

For The 

## First District of Texas

————————————

NO. 01

- 13

- 00602

- CV

——————————— IN RE GREGORY WOOD , Relator

Original Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION
Relator, Gregory Wood , has filed a petition for writ of mandamus
, challenging the trial court’s July 9 , 2013 order granting in part his motion to quash

a subpoena duces tecum from Real Party in Interest
, Rodney King, in his capacity

as Guardian of the Person and Estate of Chri stopher Michael King . The order
required that he produce certain documents at a deposition. 1

1 The underlying case is In the Matter of Marr iage of Katherine Louise King and Christopher Michael King and I n the Interest of R.A.K, a Child , cause number2 We deny the petition for writ of mandamus.

PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Brown, and Huddle.

2011

- 23444, pending in the 311th District Court of Harris County, Texas, the Honorable Denise V. Pratt presiding.
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, William Scigliano, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of IQ Biometrix, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;

            b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

            c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

            a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

            b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: November 14, 2003
                                                     /s/ William Scigliano
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     William Scigliano
                                                     Chief Executive Officer




<PAGE>
No. 56982.

#### Carey & Skinner, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 151041-K, etc. (Buffalo).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of hair-on leather, a side upper leather made from calfskins, finished or partly finished, not cut or wholly or partly manufactured into uppers, vamps, or any forms or shapes suitable for conversion into boots, shoes, or footwear, the same in all material respects as that the subject of *Carey & Skinner, Inc.*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 8, C. D. 1436), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JUAN TRIVIZO,

 Appellant,

v.

EL PASO ANIMAL SERVICES,

DR. NINA CLOUD, IN HER CAPACITY

AS DIRECTOR OF EL PASO ANIMAL

SERVICES, ELLEN SMYTH, IN HER

CAPACITY AS DIRECTOR OF

EL PASO ENVIRONMENTAL

SERVICES, JOYCE WILSON, IN HER

CAPACITY AS EL PASO CITY

MANAGER, AND THE CITY OF

EL PASO

 Appellees. 

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

No. 08-12-00356-CV

Appeal from

County Court at Law No. 3

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC # 2012DCV06427)

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Juan Trivizo is attempting to appeal a dangerous dog designation. We dismiss the appeal 

for want of jurisdiction.

Juan Trivizo is attempting to appeal a dangerous dog designation he received on or about 

November 5, 2012. Under Section 822.0421 of the Health and Safety Code, the animal control 

authority is required to notify an owner if it has determined after an investigation that a dog is a 

dangerous dog. TEX.HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. § 822.0421(a)(West 2010). An 

owner may appeal the dangerous dog designation to a justice, county, or municipal court of 

competent jurisdiction not later than the 15th day after the date the owner is notified as required 

by Section 822.0421(a). TEX.HEALTH & SAFETY CODE ANN. § 822.0421(b). An owner 

may appeal the decision of the justice, county, or municipal court in the same manner as an 
- 2 -

appeal for other cases from that court. Id.

Trivizo filed the notice of appeal in the County Court at Law No. 3 of El Paso County in 

cause number 2012DCV06427. The District Clerk forwarded the notice of appeal to this Court 

but the docketing certificate reflects that an appealable order or judgment has not been entered 

by the County Court at Law. On December 3, 2012, we notified Trivizo by letter of our intent to 

dismiss for want of jurisdiction because there is no appealable order or judgment and advised 

Trivizo that he had ten days to show grounds for continuing the appeal. Trivizo has not 

responded to our inquiry. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.

January 16, 2013 _______________________________________________

ANN CRAWFORD McCLURE, Chief Justice

Before McClure, C.J., Rivera, and Antcliff, JJ.

Antcliff, J., not participating
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

 

 

FELIX D. WHITTINGTON,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

DONALD VAUGHN, et al.,

 Defendants.

 CIVIL ACTION

 NO. 02-4346

ORDER FOR SPECIAL REPORT

 

To: Warden

SCI-Albion

10745 Rt. 18

Albion, PA 16475-0002

This pro se plaintiff has repeatedly written the court various complaints regarding his

incarceration at this institution. See the court’s Orders dated:

September 3, 2002

September 3, 2002

September 3, 2002

September 3, 2002

September 3, 2002

September 5, 2002

September 10, 2002

September 10, 2002

September 18, 2002

September 23, 2002

September 30, 2002

October 1, 2002

October 2, 2002

October 8, 2002

October 8, 2002

October 15, 2002

October 24, 2002

October 24, 2002

October 29, 2002

October 30, 2002

November 1, 2002

November 6, 2002

November 14, 2002

November 19, 2002

November 27, 2002

and the attached letters which are forwarded with a copy of this Order.

Case 2:02-cv-04346-MK Document 57 Filed 12/02/2002 Page 1 of 2
2

In order to ascertain the status of this matter, the court ORDERS a special report

from the warden of this institution which shall contain a description of plaintiff’s custody status,

classification, medical and psychiatric status and disciplinary history. 

The said special report shall be filed with the court within thirty (30) days.

Dated: December 2, 2002 BY THE COURT:

______________________________

MARVIN KATZ, S.J.

Case 2:02-cv-04346-MK Document 57 Filed 12/02/2002 Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-6089

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

BRENT GARDNER,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Margaret B. Seymour, Senior 

District Judge. (5:05-cr-01156-MBS-1; 5:12-cv-03312-MBS)

Submitted: May 19, 2015 Decided: May 21, 2015

Before NIEMEYER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Brent Gardner, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Frank Daley, Jr., 

Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Brent Gardner seeks to appeal the district court’s order 

dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. The 

order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues 

a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B)

(2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies 

relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by 

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the 

district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is 

debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 

(2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). 

When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the 

prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural 

ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable 

claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. 

at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that

Gardner has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We 

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# C_2017112EN.01003602.xml

| 10.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/36

---

Order of the General Court of 10 February 2017 — Acerga v Council

(Case T-153/16) (1)

1

((Action for annulment - Fisheries - Conservation of fisheries resources - Fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks in Union waters and, for Union fishing vessels, in certain non-Union waters - Association - No individual concern - Act entailing implementing measures - Inadmissibility))

(2017/C 112/50)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Asociación de armadores de cerco de Galicia (Acerga) (Sada, Spain) (represented by: B. Huarte Melgar, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: A. Westerhof Löfflerová and F. Florindo Gijón, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment in part of Council Regulation (EU) 2016/72 of 22 January 2016 fixing for 2016 the fishing opportunities for certain fish stocks and groups of fish stocks, applicable in Union waters and, for Union fishing vessels, in certain non-Union waters, and amending Regulation (EU) 2015/104 (OJ 2016 L 22, p. 1).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as being inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as being inadmissible.

| 2. | There is no need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

There is no need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene by the European Commission.

| 3. | Asociación de armadores de cerco de Galicia (Acerga) shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Asociación de armadores de cerco de Galicia (Acerga) shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 200, 6.6.2016.

1

---
Case 2:05-cv-00232-TON Document 75 Filed 09/17/2008 Page 1 of 23
Case 2:05-cv-00232-TON Document 75 Filed 09/17/2008 Page 2 of 23
Case 2:05-cv-00232-TON Document 75 Filed 09/17/2008 Page 3 of 23
Case 2:05-cv-00232-TON Document 75 Filed 09/17/2008 Page 4 of 23
Case 2:05-cv-00232-TON Document 75 Filed 09/17/2008 Page 5 of 23
Case 2:05-cv-00232-TON Document 75 Filed 09/17/2008 Page 6 of 23
Case 2:05-cv-00232-TON Document 75 Filed 09/17/2008 Page 7 of 23
Case 2:05-cv-00232-TON Document 75 Filed 09/17/2008 Page 8 of 23
Case 2:05-cv-00232-TON Document 75 Filed 09/17/2008 Page 9 of 23
Case 2:05-cv-00232-TON Document 75 Filed 09/17/2008 Page 10 of 23
Case 2:05-cv-00232-TON Document 75 Filed 09/17/2008 Page 11 of 23
Case 2:05-cv-00232-TON Document 75 Filed 09/17/2008 Page 12 of 23
Case 2:05-cv-00232-TON Document 75 Filed 09/17/2008 Page 13 of 23
Case 2:05-cv-00232-TON Document 75 Filed 09/17/2008 Page 14 of 23
Case 2:05-cv-00232-TON Document 75 Filed 09/17/2008 Page 15 of 23
Case 2:05-cv-00232-TON Document 75 Filed 09/17/2008 Page 16 of 23
Case 2:05-cv-00232-TON Document 75 Filed 09/17/2008 Page 17 of 23
Case 2:05-cv-00232-TON Document 75 Filed 09/17/2008 Page 18 of 23
Case 2:05-cv-00232-TON Document 75 Filed 09/17/2008 Page 19 of 23
Case 2:05-cv-00232-TON Document 75 Filed 09/17/2008 Page 20 of 23
Case 2:05-cv-00232-TON Document 75 Filed 09/17/2008 Page 21 of 23
Case 2:05-cv-00232-TON Document 75 Filed 09/17/2008 Page 22 of 23
Case 2:05-cv-00232-TON Document 75 Filed 09/17/2008 Page 23 of 23
----

----

III Bekanntmachungen

Kommission

----

GENERALDIREKTION GESUNDHEITSWESEN UND VERBRAUCHERSCHUTZ

Stellenausschreibung — Direktor (m/w) (Besoldungsgruppe AD 14) (Artikel 29 Absatz 2 des Statuts der Beamten der Europäischen Gemeinschaften)

KOM/2006/10029

(2006/C 182 A/01)

Wir sind

Die Generaldirektion Gesundheit und Verbraucherschutz (GD SANCO) der Europäischen Kommission hat die Aufgabe, im Rahmen der von der Kommission verfolgten Gesamtziele die Position der Verbraucher zu stärken, die menschliche Gesundheit zu schützen und zu verbessern, für sichere und gesunde Lebensmittel zu sorgen, die Gesundheit von Tieren und Pflanzen zu schützen sowie eine artgerechte Tierhaltung zu fördern.

Wir suchen

Bewerberinnen und Bewerber mit gründlichen Kenntnissen und Erfahrungen auf dem Gebiet der Tiergesundheit und der artgerechten Tierhaltung, einschließlich ihrer internationalen Aspekte, sowie Managementfähigkeiten zur Sicherstellung einer effizienten Planung und Leitung der Tätigkeiten und Ressourcen der Direktion. Die Bewerberinnen und Bewerber sollten deshalb folgendes Profil haben:

Bewerbungsvoraussetzungen

Bitte beachten Sie, dass die Auswahlverfahren nur in deutscher, englischer und französischer Sprache stattfinden. Die Bewerberinnen und Bewerber werden gebeten, die Größe (Anzahl der Mitarbeiter) und Art der Abteilungen anzugeben, die sie vorher geleitet haben.

Eine ausführliche Stellenbeschreibung, Auswahlkriterien und die Bewerbung sind bei folgender Adresse zu finden:

http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/personnel_administration/working_senior_mgt_de.htm

Ernennung und Beschäftigungsbedingungen

Die Direktorin bzw. der Direktor wird von der Kommission nach ihren üblichen Verfahren ausgewählt und ernannt.

Dienstbezüge und Beschäftigungsbedingungen sind die der Besoldungsgruppe AD 14 gemäß dem neuen Statut der Beamten der Europäischen Gemeinschaften.

Online-Bewerbung

http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/personnel_administration/seniormanagementvacancies/index_de.html

Sollten Sie technische Probleme haben, können Sie sich per E-Mail wenden an:

ADMIN-MANAGEMENT-ONLINE@ec.europa.eu.

Bewerbungsschluss ist der 14. September 2006. Online-Bewerbungen sind nach 12.00 Uhr, Ortszeit Brüssel, nicht mehr möglich.

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

PRISCILLA TOOMER : CIVIL ACTION

 :

 v. :

 :

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, :

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY : NO. 2:04-cv-05733

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 14th day of November 2005, upon consideration of 

plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, defendant’s motion for summary judgment, and

plaintiff’s reply brief, and after careful review of the Report and Recommendation of United

States Magistrate Judge Thomas J. Rueter, it is hereby

ORDERED

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

2. Plaintiff’s motion fore summary judgment is GRANTED;

3. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is DENIED;

4. This case is REMANDED in accordance with the fourth sentence of 42

U.S.C. § 405(g) to the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration for further

proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge

Thomas J. Rueter; and

5. Judgment is entered in favor of plaintiff and against defendant.

BY THE COURT:

 /s/ 

Legrome D. Davis, J.

Case 2:04-cv-05733-LDD Document 12 Filed 11/14/05 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:04-cv-05733-LDD Document 12 Filed 11/14/05 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

:

OLLIE TAYLOR, :

Petitioner, :

: CIVIL ACTION

v. :

: NO. 05-2504

GERALD ROZUM, et al., :

Respondents, :

:

ORDER

AND NOW, on this ____ day of October, 2005, upon careful and independent consideration

of the pleadings and record herein, and after review of the Report and Recommendation (the “R&R”)

of United States Magistrate Judge Charles B. Smith (Doc. 6), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND

DECREED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, is

DENIED;

3. A certificate of appealability is NOT GRANTED.

4. The Clerk of the Court shall mark this case as CLOSED.

BY THE COURT:

_____________________________

Hon. Petrese B. Tucker, U.S.D.J.

Case 2:05-cv-02504-PBT Document 8 Filed 10/18/05 Page 1 of 1