alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

W ASH I N G T O N , D . C . 

 

 

February 16, 2023

A Message from the Secretary of the Treasury

During fiscal year 2022, the American economy continued its historically strong recovery from 

the pandemic amid serious global economic headwinds, including spillovers from Russia’s 

illegal war against Ukraine and continued COVID-19 disruptions abroad. Our labor market 

remained exceptionally strong, with the unemployment rate at around 50-year lows.

Meanwhile, the Administration and Congress have enacted a historic package of legislation to 

strengthen the nation’s long-term economic growth. The Bipartisan Infrastructure Law is our 

generation’s most significant investment in America’s transportation system and digital 

infrastructure. The CHIPS and Science Act is strengthening our economic resilience by 

expanding semiconductor manufacturing in the United States. And the Inflation Reduction Act is 

our nation’s most aggressive action to tackle the climate crisis, while also providing funding for 

fairer enforcement of our tax code and improved taxpayer service.

The Administration is also taking complementary actions alongside the Federal Reserve to tackle 

high inflation, which remains our top economic priority, while also advancing policies to lower 

costs for American families.

The annual Financial Report of the United States Government provides the American people 

with a comprehensive view into the nation’s finances and fiscal outlook. In these pages, you will 

find information about our current financial position, including a decrease in the federal budget 

deficit and increase in tax and other receipts relative to the previous fiscal year. You will also see 

long-term fiscal projections, including for our critical social insurance programs.

It is my duty and pleasure to present the Fiscal Year 2022 Report to the American people, which 

demonstrates the government’s steadfast commitment to accountability and transparency in 

managing the nation’s finances.

Janet L. Yellen
**From:** Craig
      Engler [mailto:cengler@cornellcapital.com]


**Sent:** Fri
      12/29/2006 3:21 PM


**To:** HRegan@laidlawltd.com


**Cc:** Timothy
      Neher


**Subject:** Wherify
      Wireless




To
      Whom
      It May Concern:




This
      is
      to confirm Cornell Capital has extended the December 31 st deadline
      for new financing until January 31, 2007.  Cornell agrees not to put
      Wherify Wireless in default until such time.  Furthermore, Cornell is
      willing to work with Wherify for a further extension until February
      28 th ,
      2007
      but will do so only after January 31 st .




Any
      questions, please feel free to contact me.  Happy New Year to
      all.




Regards,
              Craig**Craig
                K. Engler**
              *Managing
                Director*


**Cornell
      Capital Partners, LP**


9171
      Towne Centre Drive, Suite 465


San
      Diego, CA 92122


Office:
      (858) 552-1177 x11


Fax:
      (858) 546-8756


Mobile:
      (619) 985-5272


www.CornellCapital.com
WORKERS' COMPENSATIO N ADMINISTRATIVE TRUST FUND, DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATIO N, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCIAL SERVICES

, Appellant,

v.

TOMPKINS BECKWITH, INC

. /ARGONAUT INSURANCE COMPANY, LINDA COOPE R (SURVIVING SPOUSE OF MARK C. COOPER)

, Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 5778

_____________________________/

Opinion filed October 5, 2016.

An appeal from an order of the Judge of Compensation Claims. Ralph J. Humphries , Judge

.
Date of Accident: November 4, 1982.

Cynthia Arnold Shaw, Department of Financial Services, Tallahassee , for Appellant.

Bill Mc C abe , Longwood, and Anthony J. Salzman, Gainesville , for Appellee

.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

RAY, KELSEY, and WINOKUR, JJ., CONCUR.
Before the Third Division,

April 1, 1960

No. 64048.

protest 59/4341 (Portland, Oreg.).

#### States Marine Corporation of Delaware and Geo. S. Bush & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5(b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
<PAGE>
                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.24
[LOGO]

                             EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


THIS AGREEMENT is made between EXTENDED SYSTEMS INCORPORATED (ESI) and Holmes 
Lundt (EMPLOYEE) for the employment of EMPLOYEE by ESI.

IT IS AGREED BETWEEN THE PARTIES:

1.       EMPLOYMENT:  ESI hereby hires EMPLOYEE and EMPLOYEE accepts employment 
         with ESI as V.P. Business Development.

2.       TERMS OF EMPLOYMENT:  This Agreement shall commence the 25th day of
         November, 1998 and shall continue until terminated by either party 
         pursuant to paragraph five.

3.       COMPENSATION:  The EMPLOYEE shall receive as compensation for his/her
         services the amount of $11,450 per mo. plus all employee benefits as 
         set forth in the current issue of the Extended Systems Employee 
         Handbook.

4.       DUTIES OF EMPLOYEE:  EMPLOYEE shall have the duties and authority as 
         set forth in the job description.

5.       ROLLING SIX (6) MONTH CONTRACT: This contract is a continuous, rolling 
         six (6) month agreement entitling employee to six (6) months 
         termination pay, at employees current salary, if terminated without 
         cause or without six (6) months written notice.

6.       VACATION:  EMPLOYEE shall accumulate paid vacation as set forth in 
         Extended Systems Time-Off Policy.

7.       TRAVEL EXPENSES:  EMPLOYEE shall be reimbursed for all authorized 
         travel and lodging expenses.

8.       FRINGE BENEFITS:  Fringe benefits shall be provided by ESI as set 
         forth in the Extended Systems Employee Handbook. I hereby acknowledge 
         receiving a copy of the Employee Handbook. I understand that I am 
         responsible for familiarizing myself with the contents of the 
         handbook. I understand that the contents in the Employee Handbook 
         are subject to change at Extended Systems' discretion and do not 
         create any contractual commitments by the Company. /s/ HL  
         (Employee Initials) 

9.       DRUG AND ALCOHOL POLICY:  EMPLOYEE agrees to abide by the terms of the
         Extended Systems Drug and Alcohol Policy. Receipt of Drug and Alcohol
         Policy is hereby acknowledged. /s/ HL  (Employee Initials).

10.      NON-DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT:  EMPLOYEE agrees to abide by the terms of the
         Extended Systems Non-Disclosure Agreement.


DATED this 25th day of November, 1998.



 /s/ Steven D. Simpson                        /s/ Holmes Lundt
--------------------------------------        ------------------------
                      Extended Systems                        Employee

                                      21
No. 60746.

#### Frederic Henjes, Jr., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 277100-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

There being nothing before the court tending in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the classification by the collector, the protest was overruled.
Exhibit 32.2


            CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with the  Annual  Report  on Form  10-KSB of  Sunshine  PCS
Corporation  (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Robert
E. Dolan,  as Principal  Accounting  Officer of the Company,  hereby  certifies,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



                                             /s/ Robert E. Dolan
                                             -------------------
                                             Name: Robert E. Dolan
                                             Title: Principal Accounting Officer
Date: March 31, 2005
Exhibit 21

**Agere  Subsidiaries**

| **Domestic      (U.S. Companies**                  |        | **Jurisdiction      of       Organization** |
|----------------------------------------------------|-------------|---------------------------------------------|
| Agere      Systems American Parkway, L.P.          | Delaware    |
| Agere      Systems Asia Pacific Inc.               | Delaware    |
| Agere      Systems EMEA Inc.                       | Delaware    |
| Agere      Systems Holdings Inc.                   | Delaware    |
| Agere      Systems International LLC               | Delaware    |
| Agere      Systems LVCC LLC                        | Delaware    |
| Agere      Systems Management Services Inc.        | Delaware    |
| Enable      Semiconductor Inc.                     | California  |
| Mustang      Acquisition Corp.                     | Delaware    |
| Optical      Insurance Co.                         | Vermont     |
|                                               |        |                                        |
| **Foreign      Companies**                         |        |                                        |
| Agere      Systems Australia Pty Ltd.              | Australia   |
| Agere      Systems (Shanghai) Co. Ltd.             | China       |
| Agere      Systems Trading (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.    | China       |
| Agere      Systems Canada Corp.                    | Canada      |
| Agere      Systems Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG   | Germany     |
| Agere      Systems Deutschland Verwaltungs GmbH    | Germany     |
| Agere      Systems Espana SL                       | Spain       |
| Agere      Systems Hong Kong Ltd.                  | Hong Kong   |
| Agere      Systems India Pvt. Ltd.                 | India       |
| Agere      Systems Japan Ltd.                      | Japan       |
| Agere      Systems Korea Ltd.                      | Korea       |
| Agere      Systems Limited                         | U.K.        |
| Agere      Systems Microelectronics (Thai) Ltd.    | Thailand    |
| Agere      Systems Nederland B.V.                  | Netherlands |
| Agere      Systems Singapore Pte. Ltd.             | Singapore   |
| Agere      Systems Investments Pte. Ltd.           | Singapore   |
| Agere      Systems (Ireland) Limited               | Ireland     |
| Agere      Systems (Ireland) Design Limited        | Ireland     |
| Agere      Systems (Ireland) International Limited | Ireland     |
| Agere      Systems (Ireland) Research Limited      | Ireland     |
| Agere      Systems (Spain) Technologies S.L.       | Spain       |
| Modem-Art      Ltd.                                | Israel      |
| Optimay      GmbH                             | Germany     |
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<LEGEND>
The schedule contains summary financial information quarterly report on Form
10-QSB for the fiscal quarter is qualified in its entirety by reference to such
a
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           5,334
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          22,595
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                              0
<ALLOWANCE>                                          0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 160,279
<DEPOSITS>                                           0
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              6,664
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        13,750
<OTHER-SE>                                     139,865
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 160,279
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                      0
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                    0
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   409
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                   409
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              409
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 66,125
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (65,716)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                    (65,716)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (65,716)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (5.90)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (5.90)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                       0
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
# C_2018094EN.01001802.xml

| 12.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/18

---

Judgment of the General Court of 30 January 2018 — Arctic Cat v EUIPO — Slazengers (Representation of a member of the cat family jumping to the right)

(Case T-113/16) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Figurative mark representing a member of the cat family jumping to the right - Earlier EU figurative mark representing a member of the cat family jumping to the left - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)))

(2018/C 094/23)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Arctic Cat Inc. (Thief River Falls, Minnesota, United States) (represented by: M. Hartmann and S. Fröhlich, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Slazengers Ltd (Burnham, United Kingdom)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 January 2016 (Case R 2953/2014-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Slazengers and Arctic Cat.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Arctic Cat Inc. to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Arctic Cat Inc. to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

---

(1)  OJ C 175, 17.5.2016.

1

---
# C_2017022EN.01000301.xml

| 23.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/3

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny (Poland) lodged on 16 September 2016 — Caterpillar Financial Services Poland sp. z o.o. v Dyrektor Izby Skarbowej w Warszawie

(Case C-500/16)

(2017/C 022/04)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Referring court

Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Caterpillar Financial Services Poland sp. z o.o., Dyrektor Izby Skarbowej w Warszawie

Question referred

Question referred

Having regard to the interpretation of the Court of Justice in its judgment of 17 January 2013 in Case C-224/11, BGŻ Leasing sp. z o.o. v Dyrektor Izby Skarbowej w Warszawie, do the principles of effectiveness, sincere cooperation and equivalence expressed in Article 4(3) of the Treaty on European Union, or any other principle laid down in EU law, preclude, in the field of value added tax, national legislation or a national practice which precludes the refund of overpayment resulting from the collection of VAT contrary to EU law where, as a result of the action of the national authorities, an individual was unable to exercise his or her rights until after the limitation period for the tax liability had expired?

BGŻ Leasing sp. z o.o.

Dyrektor Izby Skarbowej w Warszawie

---
----

|                           |                                                  |   |
|--------------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Date:  March 4, 2011 | /s/ Richard A. Hubbell                                |   |
|                           | Richard A. Hubbell                                    |
|                           | President and Chief Executive Officer                 |
|                           | (Principal Executive Officer)                         |
|                           |                                                  |
| Date:  March 4, 2011 | /s/ Ben M. Palmer                                     |   |
|                           | Ben M. Palmer                                         |
|                           | Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
|                           | (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)          |
# C_2018142EN.01004501.xml

| 23.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 142/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 142/45

---

Judgment of the General Court of 1 March 2018 — Shoe Branding Europe v EUIPO — adidas (Device of two parallel stripes on a shoe)

(Case T-629/16) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark consisting of two parallel stripes on a shoe - Earlier EU figurative mark representing three parallel stripes on a shoe - Relative ground for refusal - Damage to reputation - Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)))

(2018/C 142/59)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Shoe Branding Europe BVBA (Oudenaarde, Belgium) (represented by: J. Løje, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Lukošiūtė and A. Söder, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: adidas AG (Herzogenaurach, Germany) (represented by: I. Fowler and I. Junkar, Solicitors)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 June 2016 (Case R 597/2016-2), relating to opposition proceedings between adidas and Shoe Branding Europe.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Shoe Branding Europe BVBA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Shoe Branding Europe BVBA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 402, 31.10.2016.

1

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-6146

GEORGE D. WILLIAMS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus MICHAEL T. W. BELL, Respondent - Appellee.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (CA-00-307-5-F) Submitted: April 12, 2001 Decided: April 18, 2001 Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.George D. Williams, Appellant Pro Se. Sandra Wallace-Smith, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: George D. Williams seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistratejudge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Williams v. Bell , No. CA-00-307-5-F (E.D.N.C. Jan. 4, 2001). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED