alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

KATHERINE LIGHT : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. : NO. 02-CV-4357

:

:

HOTLINE TELECOMMUNICATIONS :

and SEUNG JO KWAK :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 10th day of April, 2003, it having been reported that the issues

between the parties have been settled as set forth in the Stipulation placing the matter into

binding arbitration and upon Order of the Court, pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1(b)

of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure, it is ORDERED that the above action is DISMISSED

with prejudice, pursuant to agreement of counsel without costs.

 

TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE, J.

Case 2:02-cv-04357-TJS Document 27 Filed 04/10/2003 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:02-cv-04403-PBT Document 7 Filed 11/20/2002 Page 1 of 1
----

Euro exchange rates (1)

11 July 2006

(2006/C 161/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

----
No. 52915.

#### Chemical Specialties Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 143858-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise in question is the same in all material respects as the estrogenic hormone passed upon in *Roche-Organon*v. *United States*(35 C. C. P. A. 99, C. A. D. 378). The claim at 10 percent under paragraph 34 was therefore sustained.
----

Action brought on 27 June 2006 — Inalca and Cremonini v Commission

(Case T-174/06)

(2006/C 190/54)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicants: Inalca and Cremonini (Modena, Italy) (represented by: Francesco Sciaudone, lawyer)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Form of order sought

Pleas in law and main arguments

The present action seeks compensation for loss allegedly suffered by the applicant companies as a result of the adoption of the letter of 6 July 1998 in which UCLAF communicated to the Italian authorities the findings — which the applicants consider wholly inaccurate — of its investigation into alleged irregularities in the export, with refunds, of beef and veal to Jordan and made allegations which also had criminal-law implications against both companies and their directors.

In support of their claims, the applicants argue:

The applicants also plead infringement of the principles of good administration, diligence and proportionality and breach of professional secrecy.

Lastly, the applicants state that, even if UCLAF's conduct may not be open to censure, UCLAF is none the less liable for causing the applicants loss. The latter could not reasonably foresee, and therefore prevent, the damage that would be caused to them by an investigation which, they assert, proved to be wholly erroneous.

----
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 16-4199

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Daniel Drews

lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellant

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the District of Nebraska - Omaha

____________

 Submitted: April 3, 2017

 Filed: August 11, 2017

[Unpublished]

____________

Before SMITH, Chief Judge, ARNOLD and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Daniel Drews violated the terms of his supervised release and was sentenced,

in November 2016, to 8 months of imprisonment and 24 more months of supervised

release. He appealed that sentence, and the appeal was submitted to this panel on

April 3, 2017. Since the appeal was submitted, Drews has served his full term of
imprisonment, had his supervision revoked again, and been sentenced to 6 more

months of imprisonment with no more supervised release. 

“Final judgment in a criminal case means sentence. The sentence is the

judgment.” Burton v. Stewart, 549 U.S. 147, 156 (2007) (per curiam) (quoting

Berman v. United States, 302 U.S. 211, 212 (1937)). Because Drews is no longer

serving the sentence, and therefore the judgment, now on appeal, the appeal is moot.

See United States v. Maxie, No. 16-1448, 2017 WL 3084423 (8th Cir. July 20, 2017)

(per curiam).

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. 

______________________________

-2-
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**ASADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of CapRock Energy Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), I, Lee D. Atkins, Senior Vice-President and ChiefFinancial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 
| (1)    | The Report fully complies  with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange  Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and      |
|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                   |
| (2)    | The information contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial  condition and results of operations of the Company. |

 

Dated: March 30, 2004

 
|   | By: /s/ Lee D. Atkins                                         |   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Lee D. Atkins                                                 |
|   | Senior Vice-President,  Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |

 

 

A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to Cap Rock Energy Corporation andwill be retained by Cap Rock Energy Corporation and furnished to the Securitiesand Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

 

----
August 3, 1950

No. 54589.

#### Cleveland Worsted Mills Co. *v.*United States,

protest 149230-K.

(Initial No. 148349-K.) Plain-, tiff’s application for rehearing granted by order of Chief Judge Oliver and; Judge Cole.

Judge Mollison concurring.
Before the Second Division,

March 19, 1947

No. 51619.

#### Protests 494659-G, etc., of B. F. Montague Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). In accordance therewith the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
In connection with the Annual Report of Citizens First Bancorp, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Timothy D. Regan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as enacted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
 (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period
covered by the Report.
 /s/ Timothy D. ReganTimothy D. ReganChief Financial Officer
April 15, 2009 
 *
    
    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form
within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been
provided to Citizens First Bancorp, Inc. and will be retained by Citizens First Bancorp, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. 107
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 219 (Wednesday, November 15, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 78397-78398]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-25254]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 78398]]

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 15, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 6, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] Contract 
97 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, 
Docket Nos. MC2024-41, CP2024-41.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2023-25254 Filed 11-14-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

DOLORES (DEE) BARRETT : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. : NO. 02-CV-4421

THE GREATER HATBORO CHAMBER :

OF COMMERCE, INC., JOHN J. (BUD) :

AIKEN, and MICKEY GLANTZ : JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

ORDER

AND NOW, this day of 2005, upon consideration of

Plaintiff’s Answer to Chamber of Commerce Motion in Limine to Exclude All Evidence of Sexual

Harassment and supporting Memorandum of Law, it is hereby ORDERED that defendant Chamber

of Commerce’s Motion to Exclude All Evidence of Sexual Harassment is DISMISSED, DENIED,

and OVERRULED with prejudice.

BY THE COURT,

 

Petrese B. Tucker, U.S. D.J. 

Case 2:02-cv-04421-PBT Document 57-4 Filed 09/19/2005 Page 1 of 1
# C_2019103EN.01002201.xml

| 18.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 103/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/22

---

Judgment of the General Court of 5 February 2019 — Mema v CPVO (Braeburn 78 (11078))

(Case T-177/16) (1)

((New varieties of plants - Application for a Community plant variety right for the plant variety Braeburn 78 (11078) - Designation of another examination office - Scope of the examination to be carried out by the Board of Appeal - Obligation to state reasons))

(2019/C 103/27)

Language of the case: German.

Parties

Applicant: Mema GmbH LG (Terlan, Italy) (represented by B. Breitinger and S. Kirschstein-Freund, lawyers)

Defendant: Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO) (represented by M. Ekvad, F. Mattina, O. Lamberti and U. Braun-Mlodecka, acting as Agents, and A. von Mühlendahl and H. Hartwig, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Board of Appeal of the CPVO of 15 December 2015 (Case A 001/2015) concerning an application for a Community plant variety right for the plant variety Braeburn 78

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Board of Appeal of the Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO) of 15 December 2015 (Case A 001/2015) concerning an application for a Community plant variety right for the plant variety Braeburn 78; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Board of Appeal of the Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO) of 15 December 2015 (Case A 001/2015) concerning an application for a Community plant variety right for the plant variety Braeburn 78;

| 2. | Dismisses the remainder of the action; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the remainder of the action;

| 3. | Orders the CPVO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the CPVO to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 211, 13.6.2016.

---
No. 58912.

protests 27988-K, etc. (New York).

#### Moise Ash et al. *v.*United States,

*328Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of lambskin plates the same in all material respects as those the subject of *A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 1643), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Ford, J., concurred.

Mollison, J.,

dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1643, *supra.*
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





CERTIFICATION




By
signing below, each of the undersigned officers hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to his knowledge, (i) this Annual Report on Form 10-K fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in this report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Vectren Utility Holdings, Inc.




Signed
this 5th day of March, 2010.







/s/
      Jerome A. Benkert, Jr.
            
            /s/
      Niel C. Ellerbrook(Signature
      of Authorized Officer)
            
            (Signature
      of Authorized Officer)Jerome
      A. Benkert, Jr.
            
            Niel
      C. Ellerbrook(Typed
      Name)
            
            (Typed
      Name)Executive
      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
            
            Chairman
      and Chief Executive Officer(Title)
            
            (Title)
Honorable W. Lee O'Danlel 

Governor of Texas 

Austin, Texas 

Dear Sir: Opinion No. o-2662-~ 

Re: Authority of Governor to "cause 

the laws to be faithfully executed" 

With further reference to our opinion No. o-2662, 

recently addressed to you, it has come to our attention 

that in aLacussing the questions therein submitted by you 

we,overlooked Section 24, Acts 1935, 44th Legislature, p. 

444, ch. 181. As a result of thla omlaaion, that opinion 

Is Incorrect, in that it falls to call to your attention 

the powers vests&In you by Section 24 of the Act referred 

to, whereby you may 

cuted." 

"'cause the laws to be faithfully exeWe sincerely regret that this error occurred, and 

hasten to modify o-2662 to the end that it may be corrected. 

Section 24 of Acts 1935, 44th Legislature, 

ch. 181, reada as follows: 

p. 444, 

"Upon the occurrence of a public disaster, 

riot, or insurrection, or the formation of a 

dangerous resistance to the enforcement of the 

law, or for the purpose of performing hi.3 constitutional duty to cause the laws to be enforced, 

the Governor of this State shall have the authority 

to assume the command of and BLrect the actlvitlea 

and functions of the commission and of the department during the existence of such an emergency or necessity. In the event that the Governor of this State shall take such action, he 

shall' flrat use the officers and. personnel of the 

department other than the Texas Highway Patrol and 

the said Patrol shall be so called upon or diverted 

from its regular duties only in the,event that 

the department 13 otherwise unable to cope with 

the emergency." 

In the original opinion, it was pointed out that 

until the legislative branch of the State government should 

provllde means by which the Governor might effectively "cause 
Honorable W. Lee O'Daniel, page 2 O-2662-A 

the laws to be faithfully executed", there was little that 

the executive is able to do In order effectively to compel 

the faithful execution of the laws of the State of Texas. 

Section 24 of the act above referred to expressly authorizes 

the Governor to assume the command of and direct the actlvitiea and functions of the Public Safety Commission and of 

the Department of Public Safety when necessary for the purpose of performing his constitutional duty to cause the 

laws of the State to be enforced, during the exlatence of 

such necessity. 

Yours very truly 

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

By aL R. W. Fairchild 

R. W. Fairchild 

Assistant 

RWF:GO:wc 

APPROVED SEP 16, 1940 

s/Gerald C. Mann 

ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

Approved Opinlon Committee By s/BWB Chalrman
# C_2017129EN.01001901.xml

| 24.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/19

---

Judgment of the General Court of 9 March 2017 — Puma v EUIPO (FOREVER FASTER)

(Case T-104/16) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - International registration designating the European Union - Word mark FOREVER FASTER - Mark consisting of an advertising slogan - Absolute ground for refusal - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Equal treatment - Principle of sound administration))

(2017/C 129/31)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Puma SE (Herzogenaurach, Germany) (represented by: M. Schunke, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: H. O’Neill and K. Sidat Humphreys, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 7 January 2016 (Case R 770/2015-1) relating to the international registration designating the European Union in respect of the word mark FOREVER FASTER.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Puma SE to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Puma SE to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 165, 10.5.2016, p. 16.

1

---
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-60178 Summary Calendar

RODGER L. MANN, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

CITY OF MOSS POINT, MISSISSIPPI; MOSS POINT FIRE DEPARTMENT; MOSS POINT COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT; C. W. SEATON, Alderman; MICHAEL A. MIDDLETON, Alderman; GLIN C. COLVIN, Alderman; CHARLES L. MOLDEN, Alderman; J. R. SPILLERS, Alderman; ED HUDSON, Chief of the City of Moss Point Fire Department; MISSISSIPPI MUNICIPAL INSURANCE, Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Mississippi

1:99-CV-506-RG

August 16, 2001

Before POLITZ, WIENER, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in
5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4.

2 PER CURIAM: *

R odger Mann appeals an adverse summary judgment in his action a gainst the

City of Moss Point, et al. Our review of the record, briefs, and dispositive law

discloses no error in the trial court’s disposition. Accordingly, on the facts as detailed,

authorities cited and comprehensive a nalysis made by the district court in its

Memorandum Opinion and Order Granting Defendants’ Mot ion for Summary

Judgment, dated January 30, 2001 and filed January 31, 2001, the decision appealed

is AFFIRMED.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2

HORIZON OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, David W. Sharp, Chief Financial Officer of Horizon Offshore, Inc. (the
Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

1.     The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June
30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company for the period covered by such Report.

|                      |  |                        
|--------------------- |  | -----------------------
|Date: August 13, 2003 |  | /s/ David W. Sharp     
|                      |  |                        
|                      |  | David W. Sharp         
|                      |  | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Horizon Offshore, Inc. and will be retained by Horizon Offshore,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
# C_2021252EN.01003601.xml

| 28.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/36

---

Order of the General Court of 6 May 2021 — Tsilikas v Commission

(Case T-534/16) (1)

(2021/C 252/51)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 89, 16.3.2015 (case originally registered before the European Union Civil Service Tribunal under number F-11/15 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1.9.2016).

---
-79.5 -79.0 -78.5 -78.0 -77.5 -77.0 -76.5

 38.5

 39.0

 39.5

 40.0

★

▲

▲

▲ ▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

05/26

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 26 May 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.92 N 77.01 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

■

■

★

■ ■

■

■

★

●

●

●

★

● ●

● ●
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

   PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

The undersigned executive officer of First BancTrust Corporation (the
"Registrant") hereby certifies that the Registrant's Form 10-K/A for the year
ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained therein
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Registrant.


                                        /s/ Ellen M. Litteral
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Name: Ellen M. Litteral
                                        Title: Chief Financial Officer and
                                               Treasurer

Date: January 11, 2008


                                       51
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of EnerTeck Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of the undersigned’s knowledge, that:





(1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated:  April 14, 2011
By:
/s/ Dwaine ReeseDwaine Reese,Chief Executive Officer and Chairman ofthe Board (Principal Executive Officer)Dated:  April 14, 2011
By:
/s/ Richard DicksRichard Dicks, Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)