alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-4.12 Investment Capital Transfer Agreement






Exhibit 4.12




Investment Capital Transfer Agreement by the Shareholders of Beijing Run An Information Consultancy

Company Limited




Transferor (“Party A”): FENG Lei

Transferor (“Party B”): WANG Tao

Transferee (“Party C”): JIN Weimin



Party A and Party B have both provided investment capital for Beijing Run An Information
Consultancy Company Limited. The registered capital is RMB6,000,000, of which Party A has
contributed RMB800,000 and Party B has contributed RMB5,200,000. Through negotiations and in
accordance with the company’s articles of incorporation and the Corporation Law of China, the three
Parties now agree that Party A and Party B transfer RMB3,000,000 of the investment capital to Party
C under the terms of this Agreement below.





	1.	 	According to the Corporation Law and the company’s articles of incorporation, the
shareholders of Beijing Run An Information Consultancy Company Limited agree that Party A and
Party B transfer the investment capital. (see attached shareholders resolution)






	2.	 	Party A agrees to transfer RMB800,000 of the investment capital and Party B agrees to
transfer RMB2,200,000 of the investment capital of Beijing Run An Information Consultancy
Company Limited to Party C. Party C agrees to accept the RMB3,000,000 transfer from Party A
and Party B.






	3.	 	The change in ownership of the investment capital by the three Parties has no impact on the
registered capital of Beijing Run An Information Consultancy Co., Ltd.






	4.	 	The three Parties are responsible for assisting the company with the procedures for changing
the shareholder names in the shareholder register, including, in accordance with the
Corporation Law, to request the shareholders to revise the articles of incorporation (to
change the shareholder names) and to assist the company with the procedures to file the change
in the shareholder register (within 30 days of the shareholding change).






	5.	 	This Agreement shall be written in four (4) counterparties, with each Party holding one
counterpart and one counterpart shall be filed with the relevant administration of industry
and commerce.





The Agreement shall be effective after signing.




	 	 	 
	Transferor (Party A): /s/ FENG Lei                                                 

	 	Transferor (Party B): /s/ WANG Tao                                             
	 
	 	 
	Transferee (Party C): /s/ JIN Weimin                                             
	 	 






September 11, 2007
# C_2018427EN.01004201.xml

| 26.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 427/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 427/42

---

Judgment of the General Court of 4 October 2018 — Blackmore v EUIPO — Paice (DEEP PURPLE)

(Case T-344/16) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark DEEP PURPLE - Earlier non-registered mark DEEP PURPLE - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Rules governing common-law action for passing-off - No likelihood of misrepresentation - Article 177(1)(d) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court - Inadmissibility)

(2018/C 427/52)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Richard Hugh Blackmore (New York, New York, United States) (represented by: initially A. Edwards-Stuart, and subsequently T. Alkin, Barristers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: D. Gája and D. Walicka, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Ian Paice (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: M. Engelman, Barrister, and J. Stephenson, Solicitor)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 March 2016 (Case R 736/2015-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Mr Paice and Mr Blackmore.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Richard Hugh Blackmore to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Richard Hugh Blackmore to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 314, 29.8.2016.

---
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 220 (Thursday, November 16, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 78814]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-25364]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Office of the Secretary

[DOT-OST-2023-0137]


Advisory Committee on Transportation Equity (ACTE); Notice of 
Public Meeting; Correction

AGENCY: Office of the Secretary, Department of Transportation.

ACTION: Notice of public meeting; correction

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: DOT OST published a document in the Federal Register on 
November 1, 2023, announcing a meeting of ACTE, which will take place 
in person at the Hilton Durham, North Carolina. The document did not 
include the link for members of the public to provide recommendations 
to members of the ACTE.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sandra Norman, Senior Advisor and 
Designated Federal Officer, Departmental Office of Civil Rights, U.S. 
Department of Transportation, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 
20590, (804) 836-2893, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#0e4f4d5a4b4e6a617a20696178"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e7a6a4b3a2a7838893c9808891">[email protected]</span></a>. Any ACTE-related request or 
submissions should be sent via email to the point of contact listed 
above.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Correction

    In the Federal Register of November 1, 2023, in FR Doc. 2023-24099, 
on page 75093, update the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION caption to read, in 
addition to the previously posted content:
    Members of the ACTE are requesting members of the public complete 
the following survey (https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/GZDGXZQ) in order 
to capture stories, feedback, questions, and concerns that, upon 
review, will be incorporated into the ACTE Recommendations Report due 
to the Secretary in June 2024. The deadline to complete the survey is 
close of business on Friday, November 17, 2023.

    Dated: November 9, 2023.
Irene Marion,
Director, Departmental Office of Civil Rights.
[FR Doc. 2023-25364 Filed 11-15-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 10
                                                                      ----------

                         FIFTH INSTRUMENT OF AMENDMENT
                         -----------------------------


     WHEREAS, J. Crew Group, Inc. (the "Company") maintains the J. Crew Group,
Inc. 1997 Stock Option Plan (the "Plan");

     WHEREAS, Section 4.12 of the Plan provides that the Plan may be amended by
the Committee at any time, with exceptions not here material;

     WHEREAS, the Committee wishes to amend the Plan, subject to shareholder
approval, to increase the number of shares of common stock reserved for issuance
upon exercise of options awarded under the Plan;

     WHEREAS, all defined terms used herein shall have the meaning set forth in
the Plan unless specifically defined herein;

     NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended, subject to shareholder
approval, as follows:

     1.  The reference to "1,810,000 shares of Common Stock" in the first
sentence of Section 4 of the Plan shall be replaced with a reference to
"1,910,000 shares of Common Stock".


July 24, 2000
# C_2017129EN.01001403.xml

| 24.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/14

---

Order of the President of the Court of 19 January 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hannover — Germany) — Ralf-Achim Vetter, Susanne Glang-Vetter, Anna Louisa Vetter, Carolin Marie Vetter v Germanwings GmbH

(Case C-521/16) (1)

1

(2017/C 129/23)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 30, 30.1.2017.

1

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

CHESTER COUNTY HOSPITAL, : NO. 2:02-cv-02746-JRP

Plaintiff, :

:

VS. :

:

INDEPENDENCE BLUE CROSS, et al., :

Defendants. :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 16

th day of December, 2003, it is hereby

ORDERED that, within fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order,

defendants Independence Blue Cross, et al. (collectively “IBC”)

shall produce to plaintiff Chester County Hospital documents from

1995 forward, culled from the four designated employer files,

relating to strategic plans, marketing plans, competitive analyses,

the Highmark merger, the sale of Highmark’s interest in Keystone

Health Plan East and IBC’s joint operating agreement with Highmark.

To the extent IBC must obtain documents from an offsite storage

facility, Chester County Hospital shall bear their cost of

production.

It is so ORDERED.

BY THE COURT:

 

CHARLES B. SMITH

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 179 Filed 12/16/2003 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:05-cv-00232-TON Document 98 Filed 01/07/09 Page 1 of 5
Case 2:05-cv-00232-TON Document 98 Filed 01/07/09 Page 2 of 5
Case 2:05-cv-00232-TON Document 98 Filed 01/07/09 Page 3 of 5
Case 2:05-cv-00232-TON Document 98 Filed 01/07/09 Page 4 of 5
Case 2:05-cv-00232-TON Document 98 Filed 01/07/09 Page 5 of 5
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7245

In Re: DANIEL E. FELIX,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. (CA-02-46-AM)

Submitted: January 21, 2004 Decided: February 13, 2004

Before WILKINS, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Daniel E. Felix, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM: 

Daniel E. Felix petitions this court for mandamus relief,

alleging that the district court has unduly delayed acting on his

habeas corpus petition, 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). He also complains

of judicial bias. 

Since the filing of this petition, the district court has

entered a final judgment order in the underlying case.

Consequently, respondent has moved to dismiss the mandamus

petition. We grant the motion to dismiss the petition as moot

because the district court has completed its consideration of the

habeas petition and judicial disqualification at this time would

serve no purpose in furtherance of Felix’s claim. Felix may,

however, choose to raise the latter issue in seeking an appeal from

this court. 

Accordingly, we grant Respondent’s motion to dismiss and

deny the petition for mandamus as moot. We grant Felix leave to

proceed in forma pauperis and deny his motion for injunction. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1999
<CASH>                                         380,548
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               21,732,930<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                   722,000
<INVENTORY>                                  6,366,787
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            35,646,943
<PP&E>                                      11,122,871
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,706,431
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              99,644,283
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       19,087,105
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        3,162,600
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       100,924
<OTHER-SE>                                  30,515,578<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                99,644,283
<SALES>                                     44,788,335
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            44,788,335
<CGS>                                       29,759,123
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               42,164,535
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,623,800
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,682,462
<INCOME-TAX>                                   757,169
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            925,293
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   925,293
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.09
<FN>
<F1>Amount represents net accounts receivable.
<F2>Amount includes additional paid-in capital, retained earnings, and treasury
stock.
</FN>


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.2




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Integrated Healthcare Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the dates and for the period indicated




This Certificate has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the Securities and Exchange Commission.




INTEGRATED HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS, INC.Dated: November 12, 2010
By:
/s/ Steven R. BlakeSteven R. BlakeChief Financial Officer
No. 66290.

#### C. S. Emery & Company *v.*United States,

protest 60/23995 (St. Albans).

Opinion by

Ford J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise described on the invoice as “21 bales nylon yarn waste” consists of rayon or other synthetic textile waste, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1532 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1532

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To disqualify from operating a commercial motor vehicle for life an 
 individual who uses a commercial motor vehicle in committing a felony 
                      involving human trafficking.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``No Human Trafficking on Our Roads 
Act''.

SEC. 2. LIFETIME DISQUALIFICATION WITHOUT REINSTATEMENT.

    Section 31310(d) of title 49, United States Code, is amended--
            (1) in the heading, by striking ``Controlled Substance 
        Violations'' and inserting ``Lifetime Disqualification Without 
        Reinstatement'';
            (2) by striking ``The Secretary'' and inserting ``(1) 
        Controlled substance violations.--The Secretary''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(2) Human trafficking violations.--The Secretary shall 
        disqualify from operating a commercial motor vehicle for life 
        an individual who uses a commercial motor vehicle in committing 
        a felony involving an act or practice described in paragraph 
        (9) of section 103 of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 
        2000 (22 U.S.C. 7102(9)).''.

            Passed the Senate September 14, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
115th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1532

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To disqualify from operating a commercial motor vehicle for life an 
 individual who uses a commercial motor vehicle in committing a felony 
                      involving human trafficking.
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 v.

CARLOS MANUEL PEREZ

:

:

:

:

:

CRIMINAL ACTION

No. 03-554

ORDER

AND NOW, this 6th day of January, 2023, upon consideration of Defendant Carlos Perez’s 

Motion to Dismiss the First Ground for the Warrant for Violation of Supervised Release 

(Document 157), it is ORDERED the Motion is DISMISSED as superseded by the Motion to 

Dismiss the Warrant.

Upon consideration of Perez’s Motion to Dismiss Warrant for Violation of Supervised 

Release and Termination of Supervised Release (Document 175), the Government’s opposition 

thereto, Perez’s reply, and the parties’ oral argument on November 21, 2022, it is further 

ORDERED the Motion is DENIED for the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum.

The Hearing for Violation of Supervised Release is SCHEDULED on March 21, 2023 at 

9:30 AM in Courtroom 14B.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Juan R. Sánchez

Juan R. Sánchez, C.J.

Case 2:03-cr-00554-JS Document 189 Filed 01/06/23 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

NATIONWIDE LIFE INSURANCE :

COMPANY, :

: CIVIL ACTION

Plaintiff, :

:

v. :

: NO. 05-281

COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE :

INSURANCE COMPANY, :

:

Defendant. :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 20 day of January, 2011, upon consideration of Plaintiff Nationwide th

Life Insurance Company’s Motion in Limine to Exclude the expert report and testimony of

Defendant Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company’s expert J. Bush Nielsen (Docket No.

40) and the Response of Defendant Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Company, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows:

1. Sections I and II of Mr. Nielsen’s Report under the heading “Opinions” shall be

excluded as impermissible conclusions of law;

2. The remainder of Mr. Nielsen’s Report shall be deemed admissible.

It is so ORDERED.

BY THE COURT:

 s/ Ronald L. Buckwalter 

RONALD L. BUCKWALTER, S.J.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

CHESTER COUNTY HOSPITAL, : NO. 2:02-cv-02746-JRP

Plaintiff :

:

VS. :

:

INDEPENDENCE BLUE CROSS, et al., :

Defendants :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 13th day of November, 2003, it is hereby

ORDERED that, by Friday, November 14, 2003, Chester County Hospital

shall provide to defendants a letter detailing its reasonable document

requests. IBC shall have seven (7) days from receipt of that letter to

comply with such requests.

It is so ORDERED.

BY THE COURT:

 

CHARLES B. SMITH

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 165 Filed 11/13/2003 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:02-cv-04398-BWK Document 27 Filed 05/27/2003 Page 1 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04398-BWK Document 27 Filed 05/27/2003 Page 2 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04398-BWK Document 27 Filed 05/27/2003 Page 3 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04398-BWK Document 27 Filed 05/27/2003 Page 4 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04398-BWK Document 27 Filed 05/27/2003 Page 5 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04398-BWK Document 27 Filed 05/27/2003 Page 6 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04398-BWK Document 27 Filed 05/27/2003 Page 7 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04398-BWK Document 27 Filed 05/27/2003 Page 8 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04398-BWK Document 27 Filed 05/27/2003 Page 9 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04398-BWK Document 27 Filed 05/27/2003 Page 10 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04398-BWK Document 27 Filed 05/27/2003 Page 11 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04398-BWK Document 27 Filed 05/27/2003 Page 12 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04398-BWK Document 27 Filed 05/27/2003 Page 13 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04398-BWK Document 27 Filed 05/27/2003 Page 14 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04398-BWK Document 27 Filed 05/27/2003 Page 15 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04398-BWK Document 27 Filed 05/27/2003 Page 16 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04398-BWK Document 27 Filed 05/27/2003 Page 17 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04398-BWK Document 27 Filed 05/27/2003 Page 18 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04398-BWK Document 27 Filed 05/27/2003 Page 19 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04398-BWK Document 27 Filed 05/27/2003 Page 20 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04398-BWK Document 27 Filed 05/27/2003 Page 21 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04398-BWK Document 27 Filed 05/27/2003 Page 22 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04398-BWK Document 27 Filed 05/27/2003 Page 23 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04398-BWK Document 27 Filed 05/27/2003 Page 24 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04398-BWK Document 27 Filed 05/27/2003 Page 25 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04398-BWK Document 27 Filed 05/27/2003 Page 26 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04398-BWK Document 27 Filed 05/27/2003 Page 27 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04398-BWK Document 27 Filed 05/27/2003 Page 28 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04398-BWK Document 27 Filed 05/27/2003 Page 29 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04398-BWK Document 27 Filed 05/27/2003 Page 30 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04398-BWK Document 27 Filed 05/27/2003 Page 31 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04398-BWK Document 27 Filed 05/27/2003 Page 32 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04398-BWK Document 27 Filed 05/27/2003 Page 33 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04398-BWK Document 27 Filed 05/27/2003 Page 34 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04398-BWK Document 27 Filed 05/27/2003 Page 35 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04398-BWK Document 27 Filed 05/27/2003 Page 36 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04398-BWK Document 27 Filed 05/27/2003 Page 37 of 37
Case 2:02-cv-04354-AB Document 17 Filed 03/31/2003 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:02-cv-04354-AB Document 17 Filed 03/31/2003 Page 2 of 2
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4.

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-41123 Conference Calendar UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOSE MARTINEZ Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 5:07-CR-794-ALL Before GARZA, CLEMENT, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * The attorney appointed to representJose Martinez has moved for leave to withdrawand has filed a brief in accordance with Andersv. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Martinez has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D August 20, 2008 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk