alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2018005EN.01003201.xml

| 8.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 5/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 5/32

---

Judgment of the General Court of 8 November 2017 — Pempe v EUIPO — Marshall Amplification (THOMAS MARSHALL GARMENTS OF LEGENDS)

(Case T-271/16) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark THOMAS MARSHALL GARMENTS OF LEGENDS - Earlier EU word and figurative marks MARSHALL and Marshall AMPLIFICATION - Article 42(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 47(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Admissibility of the request for proof of the earlier marks’ genuine use - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)))

(2018/C 005/42)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Yusuf Pempe (Créteil, France) (represented by: A. Vivès-Albertini, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Rampini, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Marshall Amplification plc (Milton Keynes, United Kingdom)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 March 2016 (Case R 376/2015-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Marshall Amplification and Mr Pempe.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Yusuf Pempe to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Yusuf Pempe to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 251, 11.07.2016.

1

---
# World Freedom Day, 2023

On World Freedom Day, we remember that the hammer blow that brought down the Berlin Wall and the might that lifted the Iron Curtain were not sparked by the words of any single leader—it was the people of Europe who spent decades fighting to free themselves and defend democracy. Together, we recommit ourselves to this cause—knowing that the darkness that drives autocracy is no match for the flame of liberty that lights the souls of free people everywhere. 

Around the globe, we are seeing a revival of the forces of autocracy, which are once again demonstrating contempt for the rule of law, democratic freedom, and the truth itself. Russia's ongoing aggression against Ukraine is another battle in the long struggle between liberty and authoritarianism, one that compels us to remember that the fight for democracy is perennial and that we must stand up for our values each and every day. 

That is exactly what the United States is doing. Together with our partners and allies, the United States will continue to defend the fundamental freedoms and human rights entitled to every person around the world. We will continue working toward a future where women and girls can enjoy equal rights and equal participation in their societies; where Indigenous groups, people with disabilities, and racial, ethnic, and religious minorities do not have their potential stifled by systemic discrimination; and where LGBTQI+ people are not persecuted or targeted with violence because of who they are. We will continue to stand with people around the world striving for a brighter future in the face of autocratic attempts to forge a darker path. As we support democracy abroad, we are mindful that our own democracy is still at risk. My Administration is working tirelessly to show that democracies can deliver on the challenges that matter most in peoples' lives, and I call on the American people to remain vigilant in the defense of our democratic values and institutions. 

As we honor the hope felt around the world 34 years ago today when Berliners finally crossed from East to West and ushered in a new future, we remember that when we choose to stand together and recognize the common hopes that bind all humanity, we hold in our hands the power to bend the arc of history. Together, may we continue to live up to the promises we have made to ourselves, to the vulnerable, and to all those who will inherit the world we create. May we work side-by-side to bend the arc of history for the good of the world. 

NOW, THEREFORE, I, JOSEPH R. BIDEN JR., President of the United States of America, do hereby proclaim November 9, 2023, as World Freedom Day. I call upon the people of the United States of America to remember the hope symbolized by the fall of the Berlin Wall and reaffirm our dedication to freedom and democracy.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this eighth day of November, in the year of our Lord two thousand twenty-three, and of the Independence of the United States of America the two hundred and forty-eighth.

[FR Doc. 2023-25223

Billing code 3395-F4-P
EXHIBIT 31.1

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Timothy Neher, certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-QSB/A of Wherify
Wireless, Inc;

      2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; and

      4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small
business issuer and have:

      a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

      b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation.


Date: February 16, 2006

                                                         /s/ Timothy Neher
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Timothy Neher
                                                         Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 13.1




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.


SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Alto Palermo Sociedad Anónima (APSA) (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Alejandro G. Elsztain, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Alto Palermo Sociedad AnónimaOctober 26, 2012.
By:
/s/ Alejandro G. ElsztainAlejandro G. ElsztainChief Executive Officer





This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except as to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1492 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1492

 To establish a Regional Corporation for Natives who are non-residents 
                   of Alaska, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 29, 2017

 Ms. Murkowski (for herself and Mr. Sullivan) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To establish a Regional Corporation for Natives who are non-residents 
                   of Alaska, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``ANCSA Thirteenth Regional 
Corporation Reincorporation Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. 13TH REGIONAL CORPORATION.

    (a) Definitions.--In this section:
            (1) Native.--The term ``Native'' has the meaning given the 
        term in section 3 of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act 
        (43 U.S.C. 1602).
            (2) Regional corporation.--The term ``Regional 
        Corporation'' has the meaning given the term in section 3 of 
        the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1602).
            (3) Secretary.--The term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary 
        of the Interior.
    (b) Authorization.--A Regional Corporation for Natives who are non-
residents of Alaska may be established for the thirteenth region in 
accordance with section 7(c) of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act 
(43 U.S.C. 1606(c)).
    (c) Meeting.--
            (1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2), as soon as 
        practicable after the date of enactment of this Act, the 
        Secretary shall convene a meeting of the shareholders of the 
        Regional Corporation established pursuant to section 7(c) of 
        the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 1606(c)) for 
        the purpose of the election of a board of directors.
            (2) Notice requirement.--In advance of the meeting under 
        paragraph (1), the Secretary shall notify the roll of current 
        shareholders of the Regional Corporation (as determined under 
        section 5(b) of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 
        U.S.C. 1604(b)) of the time and place of the meeting.
                                 <all>
```
111 NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 14. Benefits Due and Payable 

Benefits Due and Payable as of September 30, 2019, and 2018 

(In billions of dollars) 2019 2018

Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance .................................................. 79.8 75.1 

Grants to States for Medicaid .................................................................... 37.1 35.6 

Federal Supplementary Medical Insurance (Medicare Parts B and D) .......... 37.1 30.7 

Federal Hospital Insurance (Medicare Part A) ............................................ 34.4 31.5 

Federal Disability Insurance ...................................................................... 22.4 24.6 

All other benefits programs ....................................................................... 12.8 13.6 

 Total benefits due and payable ............................................................... 223.6 211.1 

Benefits due and payable are amounts owed to program recipients or medical service providers as of September 30 that 

have not been paid. Most of the benefits due and payable relate to programs administered by HHS and SSA. For a description 

of the programs, see Note 22—Social Insurance and the unaudited RSI—Social Insurance section.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

KIMBERLY MCLAUGHLIN :

 : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. :

: NO. 04-CV-6003

:

PHILADELPHIA PHILLIES :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 23 day of August, 2005, it is ORDERED as follows: rd

1. An Initial Pretrial Conference will be held on September 26, 2005 at 10:00 a.m in

Chambers (Room 8614). All trial counsel and unrepresented parties shall attend. 

Counsel participating in the conference must be authorized and empowered to

discuss and make binding decisions with regard to all aspects of this case. 

2. No later than five (5) days prior to the date of the Initial Pretrial Scheduling

Conference, the parties shall file with the Court a written Joint Case Report which

shall include the following information:

a. A brief statement describing the facts of the case and the basis for the

Court’s jurisdiction over the parties and the action (not to exceed three (3)

pages); 

b. A brief statement of all causes of action, the essential elements of each

cause of action, and the relief sought;

c. A brief statement of the defenses asserted and the essential elements of

each affirmative defense;

Case 2:04-cv-06003-RBS Document 8 Filed 08/24/2005 Page 1 of 2

MCLAUGHLIN v. PHILADELPHIA PHILLIES Doc. 8

Dockets.Justia.com
2

d. Whether the Parties have complied with the disclosure requirements of

Fed.R.Civ.P.26(a)(1) and, if not the date on which such disclosures will be

completed;

e. The date by which the Parties anticipate all discovery (including expert

discovery) will be completed;

f. Whether all necessary parties have been properly joined, and if not, the

name of any such party and each Party’s respective position of why such

party is or is not necessary to the action; 

g. Whether settlement negotiations have taken place and each Party’s

respective position on settlement;

h. A list of all counsel who will be attending the Scheduling Conference,

identifying the party whom each attorney represents. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

 

BY THE COURT:

S:/R. Barclay Surrick, Judge

Case 2:04-cv-06003-RBS Document 8 Filed 08/24/2005 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

KEMPIS SONGSTER : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. : NO. 04-5916

:

JEFFREY A. BEARD, et al :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 29th day of July, 2014, it is ORDERED that the Clerk shall docket

the Memorandum Opinion of this date and transmit it to the Clerk of the Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit to supplement the record on appeal in CA 12-3941.

 /s/Timothy J. Savage 

TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE, J.

Case 2:04-cv-05916-TJS Document 57 Filed 07/29/14 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-6584
FREDDY S. CAMPBELL, Petitioner - Appellant, versus DONALD M. ERVIN, Administrator, Charleston Work Release, Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Bluefield. David A. Faber, District Judge. (CA-94-411) Submitted: December 10, 1996 Decided: December 31, 1996 Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Freddy S. Campbell, Appellant Pro Se. Darrell V. McGraw, Jr., Scott E. Johnson, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF WEST VIRGINIA, Charleston, West Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Freddy S. Campbell seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (1994), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996, Pub. L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal; to the extent that a certificate of appealability is required, we deny such a certificate. We dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Campbell v. Ervin , No. CA-94-411 (S.D.W. Va., Mar. 6, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# March 2015

# April 2015

# May 2015

# June 2015

# July 2015

# August 2015

# September 2015

# October 2015

# November 2015

# December 2015

# January 2016

# February 2016

# March 2016

# April 2016

# May 2016

# June 2016

# July 2016

# August 2016

# September 2016

# FY 2017 October 2016

# November 2016

# December 2016

# January 2017

# February 2017

# March 2017

# April 2017

# May 2017

# June 2017

# July 2017

# August 2017
No. 61263.

protest 242920-K (Baltimore).

#### Samuel Shapiro & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of baskets in chief value of rush; that they are similar in material and use to baskets of straw; and that they would now be returned as such, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# C_2018032EN.01002102.xml

| 29.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 32/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/21

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 December 2017 — Sony Computer Entertainment Europe v EUIPO — Vieta Audio (Vita)

(Case T-35/16) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU word mark Vita - Genuine use of the mark - Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Use in connection with the goods in question - Obligation to state reasons))

(2018/C 032/28)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Sony Computer Entertainment Europe Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: S. Malynicz QC)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: H. Kunz, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Vieta Audio, SA (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by I. Barroso Sánchez-Lafuente, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 November 2015 (Case R 2232/2014-5), relating to revocation proceedings between Vieta Audio and Sony Computer Entertainment Europe.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 12 November 2015 (Case R 2232/2014-5), relating to revocation proceedings between Vieta Audio, SA and Sony Computer Entertainment Europe Ltd; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 12 November 2015 (Case R 2232/2014-5), relating to revocation proceedings between Vieta Audio, SA and Sony Computer Entertainment Europe Ltd;

| 2. | Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Sony Computer Entertainment Europe; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Sony Computer Entertainment Europe;

| 3. | Orders Vieta Audio to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Vieta Audio to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 106, 21.3.2016.

1

---
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 178-7 Filed 12/16/2003 Page 1 of 17
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 178-7 Filed 12/16/2003 Page 2 of 17
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 178-7 Filed 12/16/2003 Page 3 of 17
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 178-7 Filed 12/16/2003 Page 4 of 17
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 178-7 Filed 12/16/2003 Page 5 of 17
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 178-7 Filed 12/16/2003 Page 6 of 17
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 178-7 Filed 12/16/2003 Page 7 of 17
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 178-7 Filed 12/16/2003 Page 8 of 17
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 178-7 Filed 12/16/2003 Page 9 of 17
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 178-7 Filed 12/16/2003 Page 10 of 17
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 178-7 Filed 12/16/2003 Page 11 of 17
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 178-7 Filed 12/16/2003 Page 12 of 17
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 178-7 Filed 12/16/2003 Page 13 of 17
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 178-7 Filed 12/16/2003 Page 14 of 17
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 178-7 Filed 12/16/2003 Page 15 of 17
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 178-7 Filed 12/16/2003 Page 16 of 17
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 178-7 Filed 12/16/2003 Page 17 of 17
(V. D. 41)

Entry No. 37110, etc.

#### J. L. Galef & Son, Inc. R. F. Downing & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States

(Decided October 3, 1956)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn (Edward N. Clad*of counsel) for the plaintiffs.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

These matters are presently before me on remands from classification proceedings decided by the first division of this court in *Paramount Import & Export Co. et al.*v. *United States,*33 Cust. Ct. 409, Abstract 58473; *Omega Import Co. and Hudson Shipping Co., Inc., et al.*v. *United States,*33 Cust. Ct. 422, Abstract 58500. The judgments entered therein stated: “* * * that the matters be remanded to a single judge in reappraisement pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d).”

The matters have been submitted for decision upon an agreed statement of facts entered into by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto.

Upon the agreed facts, I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (d)), to be the proper basis for determining the values of the involved merchandise and that such values are as set forth in schedule *“A,”*hereto attached and made a part hereof, less the deductions from such listed unit prices as invoiced, cases and packing as shown in said schedule “A.”

I further find such values to be the dutiable values of said merchandise.

The actions having been abandoned insofar as all other items of merchandise are concerned, to that extent they are dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Marketing operations of dairycooperatives [electronic resource].**
 
1992|1994|1997|1999|2002|2007|2012
 
SuDoc Number:A 109.10/4:

Item Number:0064-A-02 (online)
CGP systemNumber: 000824098

 
July 13, 2018