alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Michael Walsh, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of IQ Biometrix, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge,  this report does not contain any untrue  statement of
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure  controls and procedures,  or caused such disclosure
controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to ensure that
material  information  relating to the  registrant is made known to us by others
within those  entities,  particularly  during the period in which this report is
being prepared;

b) Evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the  registrant's  disclosure  controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial  reporting that occurred  during the  registrant's  most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected,  or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying  officer(s) and I have disclosed,  based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,  to the
registrant's  auditors  and the audit  committee  of the  registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All  significant  deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses  in the  design  or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any  fraud,  whether  or not  material,  that  involves  management  or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: February 6, 2004




                                        /s/ Michael Walsh
                                        ---------------------------
                                        Michael Walsh
                                        Chief Financial Officer
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 WESTERN RESERVE BANCORP, INC.
FORM 10-QSB
Quarter ended September 30, 2007
 CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Western Reserve Bancorp, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;4.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e) for the small business issuer and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
the period in which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most
recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers
auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over
financial reporting.
 Date:  November 14, 2007
    /s/ Edward J. McKeonEdward J. McKeon, President and CEO
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

TROY SLEMMER, et al. :

:

 v. : CIVIL ACTION

: NO. 02-4349

MCCARTHY MASONRY & CONCRETE, :

INC., et al. :

ORDER

AND NOW, this ___ day of November, 2002, it is hereby

ORDERED that:

1. Discovery shall be completed by December 18, 2002.

2. A settlement conference shall be held on December 20,

2002, at 10:00 a.m., in Room #17614. 

BY THE COURT:

________________________

JAMES T. GILES C.J.

copies by FAX on

to

Case 2:02-cv-04349-JG Document 9 Filed 11/27/2002 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           2,789
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          17,477
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 8,814
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          54,269
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            51,369
<LOANS>                                        190,953
<ALLOWANCE>                                      1,238
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 281,846
<DEPOSITS>                                     231,043
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              1,877
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            61
<OTHER-SE>                                      45,716
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 281,846
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  7,153
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  565
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   894
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 9,564
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               4,854
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,858
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            4,706
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      232
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  3,770
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    975
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         975
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       593
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .10
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .10
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.10
<LOANS-NON>                                        747
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 1,034
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       32
<RECOVERIES>                                         4
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                1,238
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             1,238
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 99.1

The following certification is provided by the undersigned Chief Executive
Officer of Midwest Banc Holdings, Inc. on the basis of such officer's knowledge
and belief for the sole purpose of complying with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

                                  CERTIFICATION
                                  -------------

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Midwest Banc Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 1, 2002 (the "Report"), I,
Brad A. Luecke, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

                                                 /s/Brad A. Luecke
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Name:  Brad A. Luecke
                                                 Title:  President and
                                                     Chief Executive Officer
                                                 Date:  November 1, 2002
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Harry Fielding DONALDSON, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 91-8530, 91-8590.

United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.

March 29, 1993.

Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied March 29, 1993.

Federal Public Defender, Inc., Jake Waldrop, Atlanta, GA, for defendant-appellant.

Joe D. Whitley, U.S. Atty., N.D. Georgia, Atlanta, GA, Nicolette Templer, Asst. U.S. Atty., Robert P. Marcovitch, for plaintiffappellee.

*1391ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

(Opinion Jan. 11, 1993, 11th Cir., 1993.)

(Opinion withheld before citation applied).

Before HATCHETT, EDMONDSON and BIRCH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The Appellant’s Petition For Rehearing has been considered by the court, and in view of the court’s en banc decision in *United States v. Morrill,*984 F.2d 1136 (1993), it is ordered that our prior opinion in this case is hereby WITHDRAWN.

The sentence of the district court is hereby REVERSED and we remand the case for resentencing in a manner consistent with this court’s en banc decision in *Morrill, supra.*
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA : CIVIL ACTION

AFL-CIO/CLC and LEWIS GRIFFIN, :

GEORGE HEMMERT, GEORGE KEDDIE :

and JANICE SCOTT : NO. 05-CV-0039

 :

 vs. :

 :

ROHM AND HAAS COMPANY and :

ROHM AND HAAS COMPANY HEALTH :

AND WELFARE PLAN :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 28th day of January, 2010, upon

consideration of the Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment of the

Plaintiffs Lewis Griffin and George Hemmert and Defendants Rohm

and Haas Company and Rohm and Haas Company Health and Welfare

Plan, it is hereby ORDERED that the said Motions are GRANTED IN

PART and DENIED IN PART and Judgment is entered in favor of the

Defendants and Against Plaintiffs Lewis Griffin and George

Hemmert with regard to their claims of entitlement to the

Disability Retirement Allowance without an offset for SSDI

benefits. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Judgment be and is entered in

favor of Plaintiff George Hemmert and against Defendants with

regard to his claim for reinstatement of his Long Term Disability

Benefit. Defendants are DIRECTED to reinstate Plaintiff

Hemmert’s LTD benefits retroactive to July 10, 2007 and this
matter is REMANDED to the Claim Administrator for consideration

of Plaintiff Hemmert’s current disability status (post-2008) and

his possible entitlement to the DRA benefit (with the SSDI

offset).

BY THE COURT:

s/J. Curtis Joyner 

J. CURTIS JOYNER, J.
# C_2016098EN.01002501.xml

| 14.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 98/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 98/25

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Den Haag zittingsplaats Haarlem (Netherlands) lodged on 13 January 2016 — K v Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie

(Case C-18/16)

(2016/C 098/31)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Rechtbank Den Haag zittingsplaats Haarlem

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: K

Applicant:

Defendant: Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

Is Article 8(3) (a) and (b) of the Reception Directive (1) valid in the light of Article 6 of the Charter (2):

1

2

| (1) | in a situation where a third-country national is detained under Article 8(3)(a) and (b) of the Reception Directive and, under Article 9 of the Asylum Procedures Directive, (3) has the right to remain in a Member State until a decision on his asylum application has been made at first instance, and |
| --- | --- |

(1)

in a situation where a third-country national is detained under Article 8(3)(a) and (b) of the Reception Directive and, under Article 9 of the Asylum Procedures Directive, (3) has the right to remain in a Member State until a decision on his asylum application has been made at first instance, and

3

| (2) | given the Explanation (OJ 2007 C 303, p. 17) that the limitations which may legitimately be imposed on the rights in Article 6 of the Charter may not exceed those permitted by the ECHR in the wording of Article 5(1)(f), and the interpretation by the European Court of Human Rights of the latter provision in, inter alia, the judgment of 22 September 2015, Nabil and Others v Hungary, 62116/12, that the detention of an asylum-seeker is contrary to the aforementioned Article 5(1)(f) if such detention was not imposed with a view to deportation? |
| --- | --- |

(2)

given the Explanation (OJ 2007 C 303, p. 17) that the limitations which may legitimately be imposed on the rights in Article 6 of the Charter may not exceed those permitted by the ECHR in the wording of Article 5(1)(f), and the interpretation by the European Court of Human Rights of the latter provision in, inter alia, the judgment of 22 September 2015, Nabil and Others v Hungary, 62116/12, that the detention of an asylum-seeker is contrary to the aforementioned Article 5(1)(f) if such detention was not imposed with a view to deportation?

Nabil and Others

Hungary

---

(1)  Directive 2013/33/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 laying down standards for the reception of applicants for international protection (OJ 2013, L 180, p. 96).

1

(2)  Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (OJ 2007, C 303, p. 1).

2

(3)  Directive 2013/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection (OJ 2013, L 180, p. 60).

3

---
VISTAS Bylaws and MOU

Regional Haze SIP for FloridaVISTAS Bylaws and MOU

Regional Haze SIP for FloridaVISTAS Bylaws and MOU

Regional Haze SIP for FloridaVISTAS Bylaws and MOU

Regional Haze SIP for FloridaVISTAS Bylaws and MOU

Regional Haze SIP for FloridaVISTAS Bylaws and MOU

Regional Haze SIP for FloridaVISTAS Bylaws and MOU

Regional Haze SIP for FloridaVISTAS Bylaws and MOU

Regional Haze SIP for FloridaVISTAS Bylaws and MOU

Regional Haze SIP for FloridaVISTAS Bylaws and MOU

Regional Haze SIP for FloridaVISTAS Bylaws and MOU

Regional Haze SIP for FloridaVISTAS Bylaws and MOU

Regional Haze SIP for FloridaVISTAS Bylaws and MOU

Regional Haze SIP for FloridaVISTAS Bylaws and MOU

Regional Haze SIP for Florida
# C_2016410EN.01000802.xml

| 7.11.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 410/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.11.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 410/8

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 17 August 2016 — Stadion Amsterdam CV; other party: Staatssecretaris van Financiën

(Case C-463/16)

(2016/C 410/09)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Stadion Amsterdam CV

Appellant:

Other party: Staatssecretaris van Financiën

Other party:

Question referred

Question referred

Must Article 12(3)(a) of the Sixth Directive (1) be interpreted as meaning that where a service, which for VAT purposes constitutes one single service, comprises two or more concrete and specific constituent elements to which, if they had been provided as separate services, different VAT rates would apply, the levying of VAT in respect of that composite service should take place according to the separate rates applicable to those elements if the fee for the service can be split in correct proportion to those constituent elements?

1

---

(1)  Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1).

1

---
Before the Second Division,

May 8, 1968

No. P68/235.

protest 61/20144 (New York).

#### New York Merchandise Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Rao, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of aluminum *1041coffee percolators, classified as entireties with electric cords and plugs, similar in all material respects to tliose the subject of *Silvine Importers, Inc.*v. *United States*(57 Cust. Ct. 362, C.D. 2821), wherein said electric cords were held to be separately dutiable, the protest was dismissed and the matter remanded to a single judge to determine the value of the merchandise in the manner provided by law. (28 U.S.C. § 2636(d).)
Form 3903

Department of the Treasury 

Internal Revenue Service 

Moving Expenses 

Attach to Form 1040, 1040-SR, or 1040-NR. 

Go to www.irs.gov/Form3903 for instructions and the latest information.

OMB No. 1545-0074 

2023

Attachment 

Sequence No. 170 

Name(s) shown on return Your social security number 

Before you begin: You can deduct moving expenses only if you are a Member of the Armed Forces on active duty and, due to a 

military order, you, your spouse, or your dependents move because of a permanent change of station. 

Check here to certify that you meet these requirements. See the instructions . . . . . . . . . . .

1 Transportation and storage of household goods and personal effects (see instructions) . . . . . 1 

2 Travel (including lodging) from your old home to your new home (see instructions). Do not include the

cost of meals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 

3 Add lines 1 and 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 

4 Enter the total amount the government paid you for the expenses listed on lines 1 and 2 that is not 

included in box 1 of your Form W-2 (wages). This amount should be shown in box 12 of your Form

W-2 with code P . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 

5 Is line 3 more than line 4? 

No. You cannot deduct your moving expenses. If line 3 is less than line 4, subtract line 3 from

line 4 and include the result on Form 1040, 1040-SR, 1040-NR, line 1h. 

Yes. Subtract line 4 from line 3. Enter the result here and on Schedule 1 (Form 1040), line 14. 

This is your moving expense deduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 

For Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see your tax return instructions. Cat. No. 12490K Form 3903 (2023)
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2



                          ANNUAL SERVICER'S CERTIFICATE

                         CHASE MANHATTAN BANK USA, N.A.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                       Chase Manhattan Owner Trust 2000-A

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


         The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of Chase Manhattan
Bank USA, N.A. ("Chase USA"), as Servicer pursuant to the Sale and Servicing
Agreement dated as of December 1, 2000 (the "Sale and Servicing Agreement") by
and between Chase USA and Chase Manhattan Auto Owner Trust 2000-A, as issuer
(the "Issuer"), does hereby certify that:

1. A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from January
   1, 2002 until December 31, 2002 was conducted under my supervision.

2. Based on such review, the Servicer has, to the best of my knowledge, fully
   performed in all material respects all its obligations, under the Pooling
   and Servicing Agreement throughout such period and no material default in
   the performance of such obligations has occurred or is continuing except as
   set forth in paragraph 3 below.

3. None.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this certificate
this 25th day of March 2003.


                                                /s/ Richard J. Naeder
                                                ----------------------
                                                Richard J. Naeder
                                                Authorized Signatory
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

AMERICAN EQUIPMENT : CIVIL ACTION

:

 :

 v. :

:

 : 

SIDDIQI : NO. 02-2758

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 14th day of January, 2003, it is hereby

ORDERED that the order of December 19, 2002 reassigning the abovecaptioned case from the calendar of the Honorable Petrese B. Tucker to the calendar of the

Honorable James Knoll Gardner is VACATED, and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the above-captioned case is restored to the

calendar of the Honorable Petrese B. Tucker.

 FOR THE COURT:

 JAMES T. GILES 

 Chief Judge

 ATTEST:

 ___________________

 MICHAEL E. KUNZ

 Clerk of Court

Case 2:02-cv-02758-PBT Document 10 Filed 01/14/2003 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:02-cv-02758-PBT Document 10 Filed 01/14/2003 Page 2 of 2