alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAII REPORTS OR THE PACIFIC REPORTER

NO. CAAP-18-0000902

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS

OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

ANTHONY S. BARDIN; GREG ALLEN, SR.; GREG ALLEN, JR.; 

THOMAS J. BROOKS; JENNIFER S. BROOKS; MICHAEL CHANDLER; 

KIRBY B. GUYER; MILTON SEARLES; JOHN R. HOFF TRUST; 

LORNA E. HOFF TRUST; MICHELE L. KAISER; TODD SCHRIM; 

JOHN WARK; and SHANNON WARK, Appellants-Appellants, v.

PLANNING DEPARTMENT OF THE COUNTY OF KAUA#I/PLANNING 

COMMISSION OF THE COUNTY OF KAUA#I, KIMO KEAWE, in is 

official capacity as Chairperson of the Planning 

Commission, Appellees-Appellees

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

(CIVIL NO. 17-1-0181 JKW)

SECOND ORDER OF CORRECTION

(By: Wadsworth, J., for the court1/)

The Opinion of the Court, filed on September 29, 2023,

is hereby corrected as follows: 

On page 15, after the conclusion and to the left of the

judges' signature lines, insert an attorney credit section as

follows:

On the briefs:

Gregory W. Kugle

(Damon Key Leong Kupchak Hastert)

for Appellants-Appellants

Maryann G. Sasaki,

Deputy County Attorney,

County of Kauai,

for Appellees-Appellees

1/ Leonard, Presiding Judge, and Wadsworth and McCullen, JJ.

Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-18-0000902

18-OCT-2023

08:33 AM

Dkt. 128 OCOR
FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAII REPORTS OR THE PACIFIC REPORTER

On page 4, footnote 3, line 5, the closing parenthesis

should be regular typeface (not bolded), so that the line appears

as follows:

(Contracts); and (2) on April 21, 2015, ACNSN assigned the

Contracts to

On page 9, in the paragraph numbered "3," line 3,

replace the "l" in the word "agglieved" with an "r" so that the

line reads:

bidder, offeror, or contractor who is aggrieved in

On page 11, footnote 6, line 3, remove the first "S" in

the acronym "ACSNSN" so that the line reads:

ACNSN. We have found none. The supreme court has observed,

however, that

The clerk of the court is directed to take all

necessary steps to notify the publishing agencies of these

changes.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, October 18, 2023.

/s/ Clyde J. Wadsworth

Associate Judge

2
Exhibit 32





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





CERTIFICATION


By signing below, each of the undersigned officers hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, (i) this Annual Report on Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in this report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Vectren Utility Holdings, Inc.




Signed this 4th day of March, 2011.









/s/ Jerome A. Benkert, Jr.

/s/ Carl L. Chapman(Signature of Authorized Officer)

(Signature of Authorized Officer)Jerome A. Benkert, Jr.

Carl L. Chapman(Typed Name)

(Typed Name)Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

President and Chief Executive Officer(Title)

(Title)
_________________________________________ 

 

Order Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

September 28, 2005 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 128454 Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

YOUNG & YOUNG, L.L.C., Stephen J. Markman,

Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices 

v SC: 128454 

 COA: 251359 

Kalamazoo CC: 02-000381-CH 

NICHOLAS DENNANY, 

Defendant-Appellant, 

and 

TERESA L. DENNANY, 

Non-Participating Defendant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the February 3, 

2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are 

not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

d0919 

I, CORBIN R. DAVIS, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

September 28, 2005
 

Clerk
Before the Third Division,

August 9, 1950

No. 54599.

#### Marianao Sugar Trading Corporation *v.*United States,

protest 158778-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

An examination of the record failing to disclose anything that would warrant the court in disturbing the finding of the collector, which was presumptively correct, the protest was overruled.
(Reap. Dec. 8606)

Entry No. 753998, etc.

#### Globe Shipping Co., Inc. *v.*United States

(Decided June 27, 1956)

*John D. Bode*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that the market value or the price at the time of exportation to the United States of the Memorandum Plates Shopetta involved herein at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale for home consumption to all purchasers in the principal markets of Austria in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States was the appraised value less the item of 5.25% added by the Appraiser for Austrian Turnover Tax and that there was no higher export value.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the cases may be deemed submitted on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the foreign value, as that value is defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by section 8 of the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the memorandum plates shopetta here involved, and that such values were the appraised values, less the item of 5.25 per centum, added by the appraiser for Austrian turnover tax.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Breadcrumb

-  Home 
-              About           
-              Program Areas           
-  Wildlife Services 
-              Wildlife Damage: Reports and Publications           

# Wildlife Damage: Reports and Publications

Last Modified:  April 16, 2024

                                Program Data  Reports                            
Program data reports detail the wildlife damage management activities carried out by APHIS Wildlife Services.  Information is presented by State, species, and other details. 

                                Factsheets, Brochures, and Other Outreach Products                            
Browse APHIS factsheets, brochures, and other outreach products to learn about our work, regulations, and agricultural pests and diseases.

                                FOIA Reading Room                            
APHIS' Freedom of Information Act Reading Room contains frequently requested documents and records routinely available to the public under FOIA.

                                National Environmental Policy Act Documents: Wildlife Services                            
View final NEPA documents from APHIS Wildlife Services, organized by State.

                                Wildlife Damage Management Technical Series                            
The Wildlife Damage Management Technical Series highlights wildlife species that cause damage to agriculture, property, and natural resources, and/or impact human health and safety.

Print
Before the Second Division,

May 7, 1968

No. P68/234.

protests 63/13158, etc. (New York).

#### Kinsho-Mataichi Corp. *v.*United States,

Rao, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of electrical tape, composed wholly or in chief value of vinyl material, similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Devon Tape Corp.*v. *United States*(57 Cust. Ct. 507, C.D. 2856), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
KPMG

 

401 South Tryon Street

Suite 2300

Charlotte, NC 28202-1911

 

Independent Accountants' Report

 

The Board of Directors 

First Union National Bank:

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying report, that First Union National Bank (the Bank) complied with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's (MBA's) *Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers,*except for minimum servicing standards V.4. and VI.1, which the MBA has interpreted as being inapplicable to the servicing of commercial and multifamily loans, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2001. Management is responsible for the Bank's compliance with those minimum servicing standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Bank's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Bank's compliance with the applicable minimum servicing standards specified above and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Bank's compliance with the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Bank has complied with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended December 31, 2001 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

KPMG LLP

March 6, 2002

KPMG LLP, KPMG LLP, a us limited liability partnership, is

 

 

 

 

KPMG LLP, KPMG LLP, a us limited liability partnership, is

A member of KPMG International, a Swiss association
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

: CIVIL ACTION NOS.

:

WEBB : 02-3896

GLANZEL, et al. : 02-3917

COSTA : 02-3950

GAGNON : 02-3972

MCKENZIE : 02-4171

ZINGALE, et al. : 02-4179

PEARSON, et al. : 02-4250

CHRISTIANSON, et al. : 02-4287

:

VS. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION, et al. :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of June, 2002, the Court having been previously

advised that the above action cannot proceed to trial and disposition because of the following

reason:

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending disposition of a related

action.

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending determination of

arbitration proceedings.

[ ] - Interlocutory appeal filed.

[ X ] - Other: Case is placed into suspense pending receipt of the Case

Transfer Order from the Judicial Panel on Multi District Litigation

transferring case to District of Minnesota..

It is

ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this action closed for statistical purposes and

place the matter in the Civil Suspense File, and it is

Case 2:02-cv-04250-JK Document 2 Filed 07/10/2002 Page 1 of 2
FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction; and that the case be

restored to the trial docket when the action is in a status so that it may proceed to final

disposition; this order shall not prejudice the rights of the parties to this litigation.

BY THE COURT:

________________________________________

James McGirr Kelly, Judge

Case 2:02-cv-04250-JK Document 2 Filed 07/10/2002 Page 2 of 2
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-17-00357-CR

Cruz Favela III

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

156th District Court of Bee County, Texas

Trial Cause No. B-09-2164-0-CR-B

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be AFFIRMED. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

July 5, 2018
# C_2017151EN.01001401.xml

| 15.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 151/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 151/14

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal Administrativo (Portugal) lodged on 28 November 2016 — Giovanna Judith Kerr v Fazenda Pública

(Case C-615/16)

(2017/C 151/19)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Referring court

Supremo Tribunal Administrativo

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Giovanna Judith Kerr

Applicant:

Defendant: Fazenda Pública

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

[Must] the provision in Articles 135(1)(f) and 15(2) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC (1) ... be interpreted as referring only to parties to contracts for the marketing of rights to use properties, or [may] it also be interpreted as referring equally to the activity carried on by the applicant, consisting in attracting clients and promoting services, so as to ensure that the business marketing those services completes the relevant sale, in accordance with instructions laid down in advance and limits on discounts and promotional gifts?

1

---

(1)  Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1.

1

---
# 2018_09 Pivot Table 4

# 4

&F	

&A	&P/&N
No. 62507.

#### Sam Forwand Co. *v.*United States,

protest 327185-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
NO. 07-07-0300-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL B

AUGUST 6, 2007

______________________________

KELLY LYNN CHAIRES-DYALS FRY,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

_________________________________

FROM THE 33rd DISTRICT COURT OF BURNET COUNTY;

NO. 17513-C; HON. GUILFORD L. JONES, III, PRESIDING

_______________________________

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

_______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and CAMPBELL and HANCOCK, JJ.

Appellant, Kelly Lynn Chaires-Dyals Fry, appeals her conviction for three counts of

theft of $1500 or more but less than $20,000. The certification of right to appeal executed

by the trial court states that “this is a plea bargain case and the Defendant has NO right

of appeal.” This circumstance was brought to the attention of appellant, and opportunity

was granted her to obtain an amended certification entitling her to appeal. No such

certification was received within the time we allotted. Having received no certification
2

authorizing an appeal, we dismiss the appeal per Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure

25.2(d).

The appeal is dismissed.

Per Curiam

Do not publish.
IC 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1438 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

DECEMBER 22, 2017 

Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

AN ACT 

To redesignate the Jefferson National Expansion Memorial 

in the State of Missouri as the ‘‘Gateway Arch National 

Park’’. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

S 1438 RFH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Gateway Arch National 

3 Park Designation Act’’. 

4 SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF GATEWAY ARCH NATIONAL PARK. 

5 (a) REDESIGNATION.—The Jefferson National Ex6 pansion Memorial established under the Act of May 17, 

7 1954 (16 U.S.C. 450jj et seq.), shall be known and des8 ignated as the ‘‘Gateway Arch National Park’’. 

9 (b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, reg10 ulation, document, paper, or other record of the United 

11 States to the Jefferson National Expansion Memorial shall 

12 be considered to be a reference to the ‘‘Gateway Arch Na13 tional Park’’. 

Passed the Senate December 21, 2017. 

Attest: JULIE E. ADAMS, 

Secretary. 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
EXHIBIT 32.2

   CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Duska Therapeutics, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Wayne Lorgus, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Wayne R. Lorgus
-----------------------
    Wayne R. Lorgus
    Chief Financial Officer

April 16, 2007


<PAGE>
----

----

I Informacija

Komisija

----

Komisijos komunikatas, parengtas įgyvendinant 1993 m. birželio 14 d. Tarybos direktyvą 93/42/EEB dėl medicinos prietaisų

(2006/C 216/01)

(tekstas svarbus EEE)

(Darniųjų standartų pavadinimų ir nuorodinių žymenų skelbimas pagal direktyvą)

Pastaba.

Daugiau informacijos apie darniuosius standartus rasite internete adresu:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/newapproach/standardization/harmstds/

----

(1)  ESO: Europos standartizacijos organizacijos:

(2)OL L 204, 1998 7 21, p. 37.

(3)OL L 217, 1998 8 5, p. 18.

----

----

Komisijos komunikatas, parengtas įgyvendinant 1990 m. birželio 20 d. Tarybos direktyvą 90/385/EEB dėl valstybių narių įstatymų, reglamentuojančių aktyviuosius implantuojamus medicinos prietaisus, suderinimo

(2006/C 216/02)

(tekstas svarbus EEE)

(Darniųjų standartų pavadinimų ir nuorodinių žymenų skelbimas pagal direktyvą)

Pastaba.

Daugiau informacijos apie darniuosius standartus rasite internete adresu:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/newapproach/standardization/harmstds/

----

(1)  ESO: Europos standartizacijos organizacijos:

(2)OL L 204, 1998 7 21, p. 37.

(3)OL L 217, 1998 8 5, p. 18.

----

----

Komisijos komunikatas, parengtas įgyvendinant 1998 m. spalio 27 d. Europos Parlamento ir Tarybos direktyvą 98/79/EB dėl in vitro diagnostikos medicinos prietaisų

(2006/C 216/03)

(tekstas svarbus EEE)

(Darniųjų standartų pavadinimų ir nuorodinių žymenų skelbimas pagal direktyvą)

Pastaba.

Daugiau informacijos apie darniuosius standartus rasite internete adresu:

http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/newapproach/standardization/harmstds/

----

(1)  ESO: Europos standartizacijos organizacijos:

(2)OL L 204, 1998 7 21, p. 37.

(3)OL L 217, 1998 8 5, p. 18.

----
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1499 

To increase from $10,000,000,000 to $50,000,000,000 the threshold figure 

at which regulated depository institutions are subject to direct examination and reporting requirements of the Bureau of Consumer Financial 

Protection, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 29, 2017 

Mr. TOOMEY (for himself and Mr. DONNELLY) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To increase from $10,000,000,000 to $50,000,000,000 the 

threshold figure at which regulated depository institutions are subject to direct examination and reporting 

requirements of the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Consumer Financial 

5 Protection Bureau Examination and Reporting Threshold 

6 Act of 2017’’. 


srobinson on DSKBC5CHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1499 IS

1 SEC. 2. INCREASE IN THE EXAMINATION THRESHOLD. 

2 Section 1025(a) of the Consumer Financial Protec3 tion Act of 2010 (12 U.S.C. 5515(a)) is amended by strik4 ing ‘‘$10,000,000,000’’ each place that term appears and 

5 inserting ‘‘$50,000,000,000’’. 

6 SEC. 3. INCREASE IN THE REPORTING THRESHOLD. 

7 Section 1026(a) of the Consumer Financial Protec8 tion Act of 2010 (12 U.S.C. 5516(a)) is amended by strik9 ing ‘‘$10,000,000,000’’ each place that term appears and 

10 inserting ‘‘$50,000,000,000’’. 

11 SEC. 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. 

12 This Act and the amendments made by this Act shall 

13 take effect on the date that is 45 days after the date of 

14 enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


srobinson on DSKBC5CHB2PROD with BILLS
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

Appellant,

v.

IVAN GABALDON,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 21

- 00216

- CR

Appeal from the

210th Judicial District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20210D02909 )

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was no error in the

judgment. We therefore affirm the judgment of the court below. This decision shall be certified

below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDE RED THIS 7TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2023.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Chief Justice

Before Rodriguez , C.J., Soto, J., and Marion, C.J. (Ret.)

Marion, C.J. (Ret.)(Sitting by Assignment)
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
    
    
    FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDEDJune 30, 2010
    
    
    June 30, 2009MERRILL LYNCH
    
    
    MERRILL LYNCH
    
    
    MERRILL LYNCH
    
    
    MERRILL LYNCHPREFERRED
    
    
    PREFERRED
    
    
    PREFERRED
    
    
    PREFERREDCAPITAL TRUST III
    
    
    FUNDING III, L.P.
    
    
    CAPITAL TRUST III
    
    
    FUNDING III, L.P.Earnings
    
    $
    13,531
    
    
    $
    15,763
    
    
    $
    13,531
    
    
    $
    15,767Fixed charges
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    Preferred securities
distribution
requirements
    
    
    13,125
    
    
    
    13,531
    
    
    
    13,125
    
    
    
    13,531Total combined fixed
charges and preferred
securities distribution
requirements
    
    $
    13,125
    
    
    $
    13,531
    
    
    $
    13,125
    
    
    $
    13,531Ratio of earnings to
combined fixed charges
and preferred securities
distribution requirements
    
    
    1.03
    
    
    
    1.16
    
    
    
    1.03
    
    
    
    1.17FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED
    
    
    FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDEDJune 30, 2010
    
    
    June 30, 2009MERRILL LYNCH
    
    
    MERRILL LYNCH
    
    
    MERRILL LYNCH
    
    
    MERRILL LYNCHPREFERRED
    
    
    PREFERRED
    
    
    PREFERRED
    
    
    PREFERREDCAPITAL TRUST III
    
    
    FUNDING III, L.P.
    
    
    CAPITAL TRUST III
    
    
    FUNDING III, L.P.Earnings
    
    $
    27,062
    
    
    $
    31,528
    
    
    $
    27,062
    
    
    $
    31,538Fixed charges
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    
    
    
    $
    Preferred securities
distribution
requirements
    
    
    26,250
    
    
    
    27,062
    
    
    
    26,250
    
    
    
    27,062Total combined fixed
charges and preferred
securities distribution
requirements
    
    $
    26,250
    
    
    $
    27,062
    
    
    $
    26,250
    
    
    $
    27,062Ratio of earnings to
combined fixed charges
and preferred securities
distribution requirements
    
    
    1.03
    
    
    
    1.17
    
    
    
    1.03
    
    
    
    1.17
# sf133_schp--OUTPUT

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2021-20	&"Arial,Bold"&9V SF 133/Sch P - &P	&"Arial,Bold"&10August 18, 2021 IRC Meeting