alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 221 (Friday, November 17, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 80322]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-25465]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


Center for Scientific Review; Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: Center for Scientific Review Special Emphasis 
Panel; Neurodegenerative Disorders and Aging.
    Date: December 6, 2023.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Rockledge II, 6701 
Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Jessica Bellinger, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Center for Scientific Review, National Institutes of 
Health, 6701 Rockledge Drive, Room 3158, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 
827-4446, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#ec8e89808085828b899e8688ac8f9f9ec2828584c28b839a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="4321262f2f2a2d2426312927032030316d2d2a2b6d242c35">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.306, 
Comparative Medicine; 93.333, Clinical Research, 93.306, 93.333, 
93.337, 93.393-93.396, 93.837-93.844, 93.846-93.878, 93.892, 93.893, 
National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: November 14, 2023.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-25465 Filed 11-16-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2017086EN.01000301.xml

| 20.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 86/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 86/3

---

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 29 November 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance de Liège — Belgium) — Jean Jacob, Dominique Lennertz v Belgian State

(Case C-345/16) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Legislative and factual background to the case in the main proceedings - Insufficient information - Manifestly inadmissible - Article 53(2) - Article 94 of the Court’s Rules of Procedure))

(2017/C 086/03)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal de première instance de Liège

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Jean Jacob, Dominique Lennertz

Applicants:

Defendant: Belgian State

Defendant:

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The request for a preliminary ruling made by the tribunal de première instance de Liège (Belgique) (Court of First Instance, Liège, Belgium) by decision of 9 June 2016 is manifestly inadmissible.

---

(1)  OJ C 326, 5.9.2016.

1

---
# C_2017144EN.01004201.xml

| 8.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 144/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 144/42

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 March 2017 — Fernández González v Commission

(Case T-455/16 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Civil service - Temporary staff - Recruitment - Employment of temporary staff in permanent posts - Plea of illegality - Error of law))

(2017/C 144/56)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Elia Fernández González (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: M. Casado García-Hirschfeld and É. Boigelot, lawyers)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser and G. Bersheid, Agents, and, initially, D. Waelbroeck and A. Duron, and subsequently A. Duron, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Single Judge) of 14 June 2016, Fernández González v Commission (F-121/15, EU:F:2016:128), and seeking to have that judgment set aside.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets aside the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Single Judge) of 14 June 2016, Fernández González v Commission (F-121/15, EU:F:2016:128); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets aside the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Single Judge) of 14 June 2016, Fernández González v Commission (F-121/15, EU:F:2016:128);

| 2. | Refers the case to a Chamber of the General Court other than that which has ruled on the present appeal; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Refers the case to a Chamber of the General Court other than that which has ruled on the present appeal;

| 3. | Reserves the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Reserves the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 383, 17.10.2016.

1

---
Dollar Amount % of Total Dollar Amount Number of Transactions % of Total Number of Transactions

Fiduciary (Investment & Borrowing) 8,661,350,491,187 99.26% 11,635 10.21%

Buy/Sell 57,981,613,750 0.66% 100,918 88.52%

Benefits (RITS) 6,305,874,952 0.07% 472 0.41%

Check Aftermath (TRACS) 141,809,441 0.00% 978 0.86%

Zero Dollar 0 0.00% 0 0.00%

Grand Total - July 2017 8,725,779,789,330 100.00% 114,003 100.00%

Grand Total - June 2017 9,385,564,140,626 100.00% 119,641 100.00%

June to July Change -659,784,351,296 -5,638

Percentage Change -7.030% -4.712%

Grand Total - July 2016 15,065,866,916,321 118,284

July 2016 to July 2017 Change -6,340,087,126,991 -4,281

Percentage Change -42.1% -3.6%

Volume by Transaction Type

IPAC Operational Metrics for July 2017
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of IQ Biometrix, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, William Scigliano, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.





/s/ William Scigliano
-----------------------------
William Scigliano
Chief Executive Officer



March 31, 2004
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



To the best of their knowledge the undersigned hereby certify that the Annual
Report on Form 10-K of Marine Products Corporation for the period ended December
31, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of The
Securities Exchange Act of1934 (15 U.S.C.78m) and that the information contained
in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of Marine Products Corporation.




Date:  March 5, 2004
                           /s/ Richard A. Hubbell
                           -----------------------------------------------------
                           Richard A. Hubbell
                           President and Chief Executive Officer
                           (Principal Executive Officer)




Date:  March 5, 2004
                           /s/ Ben M. Palmer
                           -----------------------------------------------------
                           Ben M. Palmer
                           Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
                           (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Exhibit 32.2

                 Statement of Chief Financial Officer Furnished
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      The undersigned, Gary F. Hoskins, is the Chief Financial Officer of
Citizens South Banking Corporation (the "Company").

      This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the
Company of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2004 (the "Report").

      By execution of this statement, I certify that to the best of my
knowledge:

            A)    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
                  U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and

            B)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
                  covered by the Report.

      This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so
that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that this
statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.


May 7, 2004                                      /s/ Gary F. Hoskins
-----------------                                -------------------------------
Dated                                            Gary F. Hoskins
                                                 Chief Financial Officer


                                       20
IN THE UNITED STATES OF DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

 

 : MDL DOCKET NO. 1203 

IN RE DIET DRUGS : 

(PHENTERMINE/FENFLURAMINE/ : 

DEXFENFLURAMINE) PRODUCTS : 

LIABILITY LITIGATION : MDL NO. 02-20143 

 : 

 : 

CYNTHIA ACOSTA, ET AL. : 

 : 

v. : 

 : 

AMERICAN HOME PRODUCTS : 

CORPORATION, ET AL. : 

 : 

PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 

 AND NOW TO WIT: This ____ day of _______________, 2005, it having been 

reported that the issues between the parties have been settled with respect to plaintiff Kathleen 

Moran in the above-captioned action, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1(b) of 

the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby 

 ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, all claims of plaintiff Kathleen Moran 

in the above-captioned action are DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named 

Defendants. 

MICHAEL E. KUNZ, Clerk of Court 

BY: ____________________________ 

Katherine Gallagher 

Deputy Clerk 

Case 2:02-cv-20143-HB Document 24 Filed 04/13/2005 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Reginald Handford, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Ardent Mines Limited;
2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report.
4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c)   presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and
6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Dated this 13th day of October, 2003.



| | /s/ Reginald Handford
Reginald Handford
Principal Executive Officer
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------



---
Before the Second Division,

June 6, 1963

No. 67800.

#### Schick X-Ray Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 62/17640 (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of injectors and parts, in chief value of metal, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Schick X-Ray Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(49 Cust. Ct. 38, C.D. 2358), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Part 2

SUPPLEMENT

DRAFT Fiscal Year 2024 Reporting

Section VII

No Name Description Rule Attribute Combination

99E USSGL Reimbursable Flag "R" Restriction

The use of some USSGL accounts with 

Reimbursable Flag "R" is limited to specific 

TAS. 

USSGL ACCOUNT 

NUMBER

CONCATENATED 

TAS 

Pass 438200 455 X4110000

Pass 438400 097 X4555000 

Data Validations - Detail

U.S. Standard General Ledger

Bulletin No. 2023-08 DRAFT VII VDR - 1 IRC Handout 4/20/23
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1223 

To repeal the Klamath Tribe Judgment Fund Act. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 24, 2017 

Mr. MERKLEY (for himself and Mr. WYDEN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs 

A BILL 

To repeal the Klamath Tribe Judgment Fund Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Klamath Tribe Judg5 ment Fund Repeal Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. REPEAL. 

7 Public Law 89–224 (commonly know as the ‘‘Klam8 ath Tribe Judgment Fund Act’’) (79 Stat. 897) is re9 pealed. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
Case 2:02-cv-02761-RBS     Document 6-4      Filed 10/11/2002     Page 1 of 5

Case 2:02-cv-02761-RBS     Document 6-4      Filed 10/11/2002     Page 2 of 5

Case 2:02-cv-02761-RBS     Document 6-4      Filed 10/11/2002     Page 3 of 5

Case 2:02-cv-02761-RBS     Document 6-4      Filed 10/11/2002     Page 4 of 5

Case 2:02-cv-02761-RBS     Document 6-4      Filed 10/11/2002     Page 5 of 5
No. 66778.

#### Empire Findings Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 284337-K (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of otoscopes similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Empire Findings Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(44 Cust. Ct. 21, C.D. 2148), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
(Reap. Dec. 10973)

#### New York Merchandise Co., Inc *v.*United States

Entry No. 560.

(Decided May 10, 1965)

*Stein & Shostalc*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Nichols, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement is before me on the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED hy and between counsel for the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court:

> 1. That the merchandise covered by the entry and subject of the appeal for reappraisement enumerated in the attached Schedule of Cases which is incorporated herein, consists of footwear, exported from Japan, and that, on the date of exportation thereof to the United States, the market value or the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States, were the invoice unit values plus f.o.b. charges set out on the invoices, but not including the buying commission.

> 2. That as to any of the merchandise covered by the entry the subject of the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached Schedule of Oases, which is included on the list of articles designated by the Secretary of the Treasury in T.D. 54521 as provided for in Sec. 6(a) of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, Public Law 927, 84th Congress, which is subject to appraisement under *652Section 402(a) of tlie Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, tliat there were no higher foreign values for such or similar merchandise on the dates of exportation involved herein.

> 3. That all the merchandise covered by the appeal for reappraisement the subject of this stipulation was entered subsequent to February 27, 1958.

> 4. That the appeal for reappraisement enumerated in the attached Schedule of Oases may be deemed submitted for decision on the foregoing stipulation.

Oil the agreed facts, I find and liold that export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) or 402a(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, 70 Stat. 943, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise involved herein and that said value is represented by the invoice unit values, plus f.o.b. charges set out on the invoices, but not including the buying commission.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
# C_2019103EN.01004301.xml

| 18.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 103/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/43

---

Order of the General Court of 29 January 2019 — L’Huillier v Gollnisch and Parliament

(Case T-624/16 TO) (1)

((Third-party proceedings - Rejection of the third-party applicant’s application to intervene - Inadmissibility))

(2019/C 103/58)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Third-party applicant: Guillaume L’Huillier (Etterbeek, Belgium) (represented by: A. Varaut, lawyer)

Applicant in the main proceedings: Bruno Gollnisch (Villiers-le-Mahieu, France) (represented by: B. Bonnefoy-Claudet, lawyer)

Defendant in the main proceedings: European Parliament (represented by: M. Ecker and L. Vétillard, acting as Agents)

Re:

Third-party application against the judgment of 7 March 2018, Gollnisch v Parliament (T-624/16, not published, under appeal, EU:T:2018:121).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The third-party application is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The third-party application is dismissed.

| 2. | Mr Guillaume L’Huillier shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Parliament. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Guillaume L’Huillier shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Parliament.

| 3. | Mr Bruno Gollnisch shall bear his own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Mr Bruno Gollnisch shall bear his own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 383, 17.10.2016.

---
# C_2019093EN.01004601.xml

| 11.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 93/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 93/46

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 December 2018 — Kakol v Commission

(Cases T-641/16 RENV and T-137/17) (1)

((Staff case - Officials - Recruitment - Notice of competition - Open competition - Non-admission of a candidate to take part in the tests of the assessment centre - Non-recognition of qualifications or diplomas - Admission to a previous competition - Conditions for similar competitions - Concordance rule between the request and the complaint - Res judicata - Non-compliance with the prior administrative procedure - Measure adversely affecting the applicant within the meaning of Article 91 of the Staff Regulations - Competence of the authority which adopted the measure - Claim for damages))

(2019/C 93/56)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Danuta Kakol (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: R. Duta, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Gattinara and L. Radu Bouyon, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, the annulment of the decisions of 14 February 2014, notified on 2 May 2016, and of 25 November 2016 not to admit the applicant to the assessment centre tests for competition AD/177/10, organised by the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO), on the ground that she did not fulfil the specific conditions relating to qualifications or diplomas required in the competition notice, or rejecting her complaint against that refusal of admission, and, secondly, that the Commission be ordered to pay her the sum of EUR 5 000 as compensation for the non-material damage she allegedly suffered as a result of the vexatious nature of the processing of her application

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Joins Cases T-641/16 RENV and T-137/17 for the purposes of the judgment; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Joins Cases T-641/16 RENV and T-137/17 for the purposes of the judgment;

| 2. | Rules, in Case T-641/16 RENV, that there is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for annulment and, dismisses the remainder of the action; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Rules, in Case T-641/16 RENV, that there is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for annulment and, dismisses the remainder of the action;

| 3. | Dismisses the action in Case T-137/17; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Dismisses the action in Case T-137/17;

| 4. | Orders each party to bear its own costs relating to Cases T-641/16 RENV and T-137/17 and Cases F-48/14 and T-152/15 P. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders each party to bear its own costs relating to Cases T-641/16 RENV and T-137/17 and Cases F-48/14 and T-152/15 P.

---

(1)  OJ C 52, 22.2.2014 (proceedings initially brought before the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union under number F-1/14 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1.9.2016).

---
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

38 40 42



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 1000 18 12 06 00 07/17 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 17 Jul 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.50 N 76.81 WMeters AGL