alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 61264.

protests 305390-K, etc. (New York).

#### W. J. Bush Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of camphor oil the same in all material respects as that the subject of Abstract 60507, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>     0001051860
<NAME>    SCOVILL HOLDINGS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             719
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,241
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,178
<INVENTORY>                                     25,236
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                40,786
<PP&E>                                          78,328
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,214
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 217,824
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,822
<BONDS>                                        136,114
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      30,389
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   217,824
<SALES>                                         22,357
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,357
<CGS>                                           16,582
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,355
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   760
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    84
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,866
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2,624)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (881)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,743)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,743)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        
 


</TABLE>
July 27, 1945

No. 50384.

Suit 4488

#### *United States*v. *Butler Bros.*

affirmed May 24, 1945. C. A. D. 310.
# Bulletin No. 2015-XX

# Additional Information
EXHIBIT 32.2



STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF

2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



The undersigned, Terry Prichard, is the Chief Financial Officer of Pocahontas Bancorp, Inc. (the Company).



This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the
Company of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005 (the Report).



By execution of this statement, I certify that:



| | A) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | B) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods covered by the Report.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This statement
is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18
U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



|                  |                |                   
|----------------- | -------------- | ------------------
|May 13, 2005Dated |                | /s/ Terry Prichard
|                  | Terry Prichard
Exhibit
32(b)








This
Certification is being furnished and shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of
Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise
subject to the liability of that section.  This Certification shall
not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other
document pursuant to the Securities Act of 1933, except as otherwise stated in
such filing.








Certification
Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63


of Title
18 of the United States Code








In
connection with the Annual Report of Indiana Michigan Power Company (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K (the “Report”) for the year ended December 31, 2008 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Holly
Keller Koeppel, the chief financial officer of the Company certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 that, based on my knowledge (i) the Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.








/s/ Holly Keller
Koeppel    ________


Holly
Keller Koeppel


Chief
Financial Officer








February 27,
2009








A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to
American Electric Power Company, Inc. and will be retained by American Electric
Power Company, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1108 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1108

To amend title 4, United States Code, to provide for the flying of the 
 flag at half-staff in the event of the death of a first responder in 
                           the line of duty.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 11, 2017

 Mr. Tester (for himself, Mr. Boozman, Mr. Blumenthal, Mr. Moran, Mr. 
  Udall, Mr. Carper, and Mr. Gardner) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend title 4, United States Code, to provide for the flying of the 
 flag at half-staff in the event of the death of a first responder in 
                           the line of duty.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Honoring Hometown Heroes Act''.

SEC. 2. PERMITTING THE FLAG TO BE FLOWN AT HALF-STAFF IN THE EVENT OF 
              THE DEATH OF A FIRST RESPONDER SERVING IN THE LINE OF 
              DUTY.

    (a) Amendment.--The sixth sentence of section 7(m) of title 4, 
United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by striking ``or'' after ``possession of the United 
        States'' and inserting a comma;
            (2) by inserting ``or the death of a first responder 
        working in any State, territory, or possession who dies while 
        serving in the line of duty,'' after ``while serving on active 
        duty,'';
            (3) by striking ``and'' after ``former officials of the 
        District of Columbia'' and inserting a comma; and
            (4) by inserting before the period the following: ``, and 
        first responders working in the District of Columbia''.
    (b) First Responder Defined.--Section 7(m) of title 4, United 
States Code, is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (2), by striking ``, United States Code; 
        and'' and inserting a semicolon;
            (2) in paragraph (3), by striking the period at the end and 
        inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(4) the term `first responder' means a `public safety 
        officer' as defined in section 1204 of the Omnibus Crime 
        Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3796b).''.
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this Act shall apply 
with respect to deaths of first responders occurring on or after the 
date of enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

LAMAR HAUPT and CAROL HAUPT

02-2717

District Court Docket Number

vs.

THE GOODYEAR TIRE AND RUBBER COMPANY

Notice of Appeal Filed 7/17/03

Court Reporter(s)/ESR Operator(s) ESR

Filing Fee:

 Notice of Appeal X Paid Not Paid Seaman

 Docket Fee X Paid Not Paid USA/VI

CJA Appointment (Attach Copy of Order)

 Private Attorney

 Defender Association or Federal Public Defender

 Motion Pending

Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis status, if applicable: (Attach copy of the Order)

 Motion Granted

 Motion Denied

 Motion pending before district judge

Certificate of probable cause (state habeas corpus): (Attach copy of the Order)

 Granted

 Denied

 Pending

CC: 

 

 

 

Defendant's Address (for criminal appeals)

Prepared by : 

 JOE LAVIN,Deputy Clerk Signature/Date

PLEASE APPEND TO THE NOTICE OF APPEAL AND FORWARD TO

THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

notapp.frm

Case 2:02-cv-02717-MAM Document 38 Filed 07/17/2003 Page 1 of 1
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 86

Note 6. Property, Plant, and Equipment, Net

Property, Plant, and Equipment as of September 30, 2018, and 2017

Accumulated 

Depreciation/ 

Amortization

Accumulated 

Depreciation/ 

Cost Net Cost Amortization Net

(In billions of dollars) 2018 2017 Restated

Buildings, structures, and facilities.................. 728.4 431.1 297.3 692.6 406.9 285.7

Furniture, fixtures, and equipment ..................1,363.9 782.7 581.2 1,320.6 752.6 568.0

Construction in progress................................ 159.5 N/A 159.5 168.2 N/A 168.2

Land............................................................. 21.5 N/A 21.5 24.0 N/A 24.0

Other property, plant, and equipment ............. 87.4 56.4 31.0 84.1 43.0 41.1

Total property, plant, and equipment, net...2,360.7 1,270.2 1,090.5 2,289.5 1,202.5 1,087.0

Beginning in fiscal year 2018, all entities are now reported together in each line item total for PP&E. DOD comprises 

approximately 69.6 percent of the government’s reported property, plant, and equipment, net, as of September 30, 2018. 

DOD continues to implement SFFAS No. 50, Establishing Opening Balances for General Property, Plant, and Equipment

which permits alternative methods in establishing opening balances for general PP&E. The total acreage of land and land 

rights excluded in this manner was 20,926,485 as of September 30, 2018.

In fiscal year 2017, restatements due to compilation errors in the presentation of the Balance Sheet and PP&E, net 

totaled $52.5 billion. 

The following entities comprise over 90 percent of the government’s reported PP&E net of $1,090.5 billion as of 

September 30, 2018. Please refer to the entities’ financial statements for details.

x DOD

x DOE

x GSA

x VA

x TVA

x DOI

x State

x DOT

x USPS

x DHS

x NASA

x DOC

x DOJ

x HHS

Certain PP&E are multi-use heritage assets, see Note 24—Stewardship Land and Heritage Assets for additional 

information on multi-use heritage assets.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

COMAPER CORPORATION, :

Plaintiff, :

: CIVIL ACTION

v. :

: NO. 05-1103

ANTEC, INC., ET AL., :

Defendants. :

ORDER

AND NOW, this ____ day of April 2012, upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion for

Judgment as a Matter of Law of Invalidity (Doc. 174), Defendant’s Renewed Motion for Judgment as a

Matter of Law, or, in the Alternative, New Trial (Docs. 187, 188), Plaintiff’s Response (Doc. 199),

Defendant’s Reply (Doc. 201), Plaintiff’s Sur-Reply (Doc. 204), and all accompanying briefs and

relevant correspondence, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED that:

1. Defendant’s initial Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law of Invalidity (Doc.

174) is DENIED AS MOOT, and

2. Defendant’s Renewed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law (Docs. 187, 188)

is GRANTED.

1

 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case shall be closed for statistical purposes.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Petrese B. Tucker

___________________________

Hon. Petrese B. Tucker, U.S.D.J.

 This Order accompanies the memorandum issued by the Court on April 2, 2012. 1

Case 2:05-cv-01103-PBT Document 207 Filed 04/02/12 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Certification of Nevada Classic Thoroughbreds, Inc.  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  regarding Annual Report on Form 10-KSB  for the year ended June 30, 2008**

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title  18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Nevada Classic  Thoroughbreds, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), doeshereby certify that, based upon her knowledge:

1. The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended    June 30, 2008 (the "Form 10-KSB") fully complies with the    requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. Information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of  the Company.

> 
 

| Dated: October 14, 2008 | By: /s/ Brad Brimhall                                   |
|-------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------|
|                    |                                                         |
|                    | Brad Brimhall                                           |
|                    | Chief Accounting Officer/Acting Chief Financial Officer |

>
# C_2017095EN.01000403.xml

| 27.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 95/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/4

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzgericht (Austria) lodged on 5 December 2016 — Kreuzmayr GmbH

(Case C-628/16)

(2017/C 095/10)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundesfinanzgericht

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Kreuzmayr GmbH

Applicant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

Question 1:

In circumstances such as those at issue in the main proceedings, in which a taxable person X1 has at its disposal goods stored in Member State A and has sold those goods to a taxable person X2, and X2 has expressed to X1 its intention to transport the goods to Member State B, and X2 has presented to X1 its VAT identification number issued by Member State B,

and X2 has sold those goods on to a taxable person X3 and X2 has agreed with X3 that X3 will arrange or carry out the transport of the goods from Member State A to Member State B and X3 has arranged or carried out the transport of the goods from Member State A to Member State B and X3 was already entitled to dispose of the goods as owner in Member State A,

and X2 has not, however, informed X1 that he has already sold on the goods before they leave Member State A,

and X1 also could not know that X2 would not be arranging or carrying out the transport of the goods from Member State A to Member State B,

is EU law to be interpreted as meaning that the place of supply from X1 to X2 is determined in accordance with the first paragraph of Article 32 of Directive 2006/112/EC (1) and that the supply from X1 to X2 is thus the intra-Community (the so-called ‘active’) supply (bewegte Lieferung)?

1

bewegte Lieferung

Question 2:

If Question 1 must be answered in the negative, is EU law then to be interpreted as meaning that X3 may nevertheless deduct as input VAT an amount of VAT of Member State B invoiced to it by X2, provided that X3 uses the goods purchased for purposes of its transactions taxed in Member State B and no wrongful exercise of the right of deduction of input VAT can be imputed to X3?

Question 3:

If Question 1 must be answered in the affirmative and X1 subsequently learns that X3 has arranged the transport and was already entitled to dispose of the goods as owner in Member State A, is EU law then to be interpreted as meaning that the supply from X1 to X2 retrospectively loses its status as the intra-Community supply (that it is thus to be viewed retrospectively as a so-called ‘passive’ supply (ruhende Lieferung))?

ruhende Lieferung

---

(1)  Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1.

1

---
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1



               Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent Auditors



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 33-72888) pertaining to the Odyssey HealthCare, Inc. Stock Option Plan,
the Odyssey Healthcare, Inc. 2001 Equity-Based Compensation Plan and the Odyssey
HealthCare, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan of our report dated February 1,
2002, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Odyssey
HealthCare, Inc. included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended
December 31, 2001.


                                                /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP




Dallas, Texas
March 18, 2002
No. 63590.

protest 59/4379 (New York).

#### J. Conti Products *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5(b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE

AT KNOXVILLE

January 23, 2020 Session

IN RE ISABELLA W.

Appeal from the Juvenile Court for Knox County

No. 147106 Timothy E. Irwin, Judge

___________________________________

No. E2019-01346-COA-R3-PT

___________________________________

D. MICHAEL SWINEY, C.J., with whom THOMAS R. FRIERSON, II, J., joins, concurring and 

dissenting.

I concur with the majority’s opinion except as to the holding that the ground as to 

the “failure to manifest an ability and willingness to assume custody” was not satisfied. 

This Court is split on this issue, and I agree with the line of cases that hold that the parent 

has to be able and willing rather than just either of the two. See In re Amynn K., No. 

E2017-01866-COA-R3-PT, 2018 WL 3058280, at *12-14 (Tenn. Ct. App. June 20, 

2018). I concur in all the rest of the majority’s opinion including termination of the 

father’s parental rights. Given this Court’s clear and irreconcilable split as to this 

question of statutory interpretation, I request the Tennessee Supreme Court accept and 

resolve this issue once it has the opportunity to do so. 

____________________________________

D. MICHAEL SWINEY, CHIEF JUDGE

04/29/2020
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Justice

###### Antitrust Division

                    Notice is hereby given that, on August 29, 2023, pursuant to section 6(a) of the National Cooperative Research and Production Act of 1993, 15 U.S.C. 4301*et seq.*                     (“the Act”), Southwest Research Institute—Cooperative Research Group on ROS-Industrial Consortium-Americas (“RIC-Americas”) has filed written notifications simultaneously with the Attorney General and the Federal Trade Commission disclosing changes in its membership. The notifications were filed for the purpose of extending the Act's provisions limiting the recovery of antitrust plaintiffs to actual damages under specified circumstances. Specifically, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA; and Intrinsic Innovation LLC, Mountain View, CA, have been added as parties to this venture.                

No other changes have been made in either the membership or planned activity of the group research project. Membership in this group research project remains open, and RIC-Americas intends to file additional written notifications disclosing all changes in membership.

                    On April 30, 2014, RIC-Americas filed its original notification pursuant to section 6(a) of the Act. The Department of Justice published a notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on June 9, 2014 (79 FR 32999).                

                    The last notification was filed with the Department on June 15, 2023. A notice was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     pursuant to section 6(b) of the Act on August 23, 2023 (88 FR 57478).                

Suzanne Morris,

Deputy Director Civil Enforcement Operations, Antitrust Division.

[FR Doc. 2023-25611 Filed 11-17-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Ardent Mines Limited(the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Urmas Turu, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) 	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) 	The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated this 6th day of October, 2009.



| | URMAS TURU                                         
| | ---------------------------------------------------
| | Urmas Turu,                                        
| | Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer













A signed original of these written statements required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Ardent Mines Limited and will be retained by Ardent Mines Limited  and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.



---