alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORTS PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





To the best of their knowledge the undersigned hereby certify that the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Marine Products Corporation for the period ended December 31, 2007, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. Sec. 78m) and that the information contained in the Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Marine Products Corporation.





Date:  March 4, 2008


/s/ Richard A. Hubbell___________________________________


Richard A. Hubbell


President and Chief Executive Officer


(Principal Executive Officer)








Date:  March 4, 2008


/s/ Ben M. Palmer___________________________________


Ben M. Palmer


Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer


(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>      0001051885
<NAME>     SCOVILL FASTENERS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             MAR-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             719
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   15,241
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,178
<INVENTORY>                                     25,236
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                40,786
<PP&E>                                          78,328
<DEPRECIATION>                                  10,214
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 217,824
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,822
<BONDS>                                        136,114
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      30,389
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   217,824
<SALES>                                         22,357
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,357
<CGS>                                           16,582
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,205
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   760
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    84
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,866
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2,474)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (881)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,593)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (1,593)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.2



CERTIFICATION

I, Dmitry Beinus, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Shoe Pavilion, Inc. for the period ended June 30, 2007;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material
fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in
all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed
under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by
others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this  report is being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this  report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based upon such
evaluation;

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting.



Date:  August 9, 2007

/s/ DMITRY BEINUS	 Dmitry Beinus
  Interim Principal Financial Officer

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 16, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 8, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 101 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-47, CP2024-47.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-25263 Filed 11-15-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DARRYL BURGHARDT,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

 v.

J. FRANZ; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 15-15498

D.C. No. 5:12-cv-05190-BLF

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Beth Labson Freeman, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted December 14, 2016** 

Before: WALLACE, LEAVY, and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

Darryl Burghardt appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment 

in his action alleging retaliation and deliberate indifference to his safety. We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s

summary judgment for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Williams v.

FILED

DEC 20 2016

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Paramo, 775 F.3d 1182, 1191 (9th Cir. 2015). We review for an abuse of

discretion the district court’s dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure

4(m). In re Sheehan, 253 F.3d 507, 511 (9th Cir. 2001). We affirm in part, vacate

in part, and remand.

The district court properly granted summary judgment for defendants Franz,

Kelley, and Bragger because Burghardt failed to raise a genuine dispute of material

fact as to whether he exhausted his administrative remedies before filing his

lawsuit or whether administrative remedies were effectively unavailable. See Sapp

v. Kimbrell, 623 F.3d 813, 822 (9th Cir. 2010) (PLRA does not require exhaustion

when remedies are “effectively unavailable”); McKinney v. Carey, 311 F.3d 1198,

1199-201 (9th Cir. 2002) (prison grievance process must be completed before a

civil rights action is filed; exhaustion during the pendency of the litigation is

insufficient because exhaustion is a precondition to suit). We treat the judgment as

a dismissal without prejudice as to these claims. See Lira v. Herrera, 427 F.3d

1164, 1170 (9th Cir. 2005) (“[A] district court must dismiss a case without

prejudice when there is no pre[-]suit exhaustion.” (citation and internal quotation

marks omitted)).

However, the district court dismissed defendant Graham under Fed. R. Civ.

P. 4(m) because the U.S. Marshal could not locate him to effectuate service. The

2 15-15498
district court ordered Burghardt to provide the court with Graham’s location so that

the U.S. Marshal could serve Graham. Burghardt filed a notice containing a new

address for Graham, but the district court apparently overlooked this notice.

Accordingly, we vacate the judgment in part and remand for further proceedings as

to Graham only.

The parties shall bear their own costs on appeal.

AFFIRMED in part, VACATED in part, and REMANDED.

3 15-15498
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 223 (Tuesday, November 21, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 80984]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-25438]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Part 300

[TD 9982]
RIN 1545-BQ26


User Fees Relating to Enrolled Actuaries; Correction

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Final regulations; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains a correction to Treasury Decision 9982, 
which was published in the Federal Register for Friday, October 20, 
2023. Treasury Decision 9982 issued final regulations amending existing 
regulations relating to user fees for enrolled actuaries.

DATES: This correction is effective on November 21, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carolyn M. Lee at (202) 317-6845 (not 
a toll-free number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    The final regulations (TD 9982) that are the subject of this 
correction are under 26 CFR part 300--User Fees.

Corrections to Publication

    Accordingly, the final regulations (TD 9982) that are the subject 
of FR Doc 2023-23301, published on October 20, 2023, are corrected on 
page 72370, in the first column, in the second line under the heading 
``List of Subjects in 26 CFR Part 300'' by removing ``Use fees'' and 
adding ``User fees'' in its place.

Oluwafunmilayo A. Taylor,
Section Chief, Publications & Regulations Section, Associate Chief 
Counsel, (Procedure and Administration).
[FR Doc. 2023-25438 Filed 11-20-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Opinion issued March 5, 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals For The 

## First District of Texas

———————————— NO. 01
- 12
- 0003 5
- C V

——————————— IN RE AZHAR SAID , P HOENICIAN IMPORTS, I NC. , RIGIN, INC., ABBASID, INC., AND H ELIOTECH, INC. , Relator s

O riginal Proceeding on Petition for Writ of Mandamus

MEMORANDUM OPINION Relator s petitioned for writ of mandamus on January 17, 2012

. 1 On November 20, 2012, th e Clerk of this Court sent a notice to the parties informing them that our records indicated that the petition for writ of mandamus was moot and stating that, if they believed the petition for writ of mandamus was not moot,

1 The underlying case is Asif Said , et al. v. Azhar Said , et al. , No. 0634130 ( 1 51st Dist. Ct., Harris Cnty. , Tex. ), the Honorable Michael Engelhart , presiding.2 they were required to file a writ ten response by Monday, December 3, 2012. As of February 28 , 201 3 , no response has been received by the Court. Accordingly, we dismiss the petition for writ of mandamus. See T EX
. R.
A PP
. P . 42.3(c) (providing for involuntary dismissal of civil case for failure to comply with notice from clerk requiring response or other action within specified time). Any pending motions are dismissed as moot. PER CURIAM Panel consists of Justices Keyes, Sharp , and Huddle

.
# C_2016392EN.01001401.xml

| 24.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 392/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 392/14

---

Appeal brought on 12 August 2016 by Trefilerías Quijano, S.A. against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 2 June 2016 in Joined Cases T-426/10 to T-429/16 and T-438/12 to T-441/12, Moreda-Riviere Trefilerías and Others v Commission

(Case C-456/16 P)

(2016/C 392/18)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Trefilerías Quijano, S.A. (represented by: F. González Díaz, A. Tresandi Blanco and V. Romero Algarra, lawyers)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Other party to the proceedings:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:

| — | set aside the judgment of the General Court of 2 June 2016 in Cases T-438/12 to T-441/12 and, in particular, in Case T-439/12, Trefilerías Quijano v European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the judgment of the General Court of 2 June 2016 in Cases T-438/12 to T-441/12 and, in particular, in Case T-439/12, Trefilerías Quijano v European Commission;

Trefilerías Quijano

European Commission

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs incurred in both the present proceedings and the proceedings before the General Court |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs incurred in both the present proceedings and the proceedings before the General Court

Grounds of appeal and main arguments

Grounds of appeal and main arguments

| 1. | The General Court erred in law in declaring inadmissible the plea in law relating to the infringement of the appellant’s rights of defence. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The General Court erred in law in declaring inadmissible the plea in law relating to the infringement of the appellant’s rights of defence.

| 2. | The General Court erred in law by applying an incorrect legal standard when evaluating the second request for inability to pay and, consequently, the admissibility of the action. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The General Court erred in law by applying an incorrect legal standard when evaluating the second request for inability to pay and, consequently, the admissibility of the action.

| 3. | The General Court erred in law in evaluating the evidence or clearly distorting the evidence, failing to carry out a full review exercising its powers of unlimited jurisdiction, infringing the right to effective judicial protection and failing to state reasons. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The General Court erred in law in evaluating the evidence or clearly distorting the evidence, failing to carry out a full review exercising its powers of unlimited jurisdiction, infringing the right to effective judicial protection and failing to state reasons.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

BRADLEY : CIVIL ACTION

:

 :

 v. :

:

 : 

CON AGRA DAIRY FOODS : NO. 02-4356

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 9th day of December, 2002, in accordance with the court's

procedure for random reassignment of cases, it is hereby

ORDERED that the above-captioned case is reassigned from the calendar of

the Honorable Bruce W. Kauffman to the calendar of the Honorable James Knoll Gardner.

 FOR THE COURT:

 JAMES T. GILES 

 Chief Judge

 ATTEST:

 ___________________

 MICHAEL E. KUNZ

 Clerk of Court

Case 2:02-cv-04356-JKG Document 6 Filed 12/09/2002 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**Statement
      of Chief Financial Officer Furnished**


**Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





The
      undersigned, Gary F. Hoskins, is the Chief Financial Officer of Citizens South
      Banking Corporation (the “Company”).





This
      statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the Company of
      the
      Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007
      (the “Report”).





By
      execution of this statement, I certify that to the best of my
      knowledge:





|A) | the
              Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
              of
              the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d))
              and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|B) | the
              information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
              respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
              Company
              as of the dates and for the periods covered by the
              Report.
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





Date: May
              9, 2007
            
            /s/ Gary F. HoskinsGary F. HoskinsChief Financial
              Officer




This
      statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that
      this
      statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that this statement
      be
      deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to Citizens South Banking Corporation and will be retained
      by Citizens South Banking Corporation and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2018005EN.01003301.xml

| 8.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 5/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 5/33

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 November 2017 — Carrera Brands v EUIPO — Autec (Carrera)

(Case T-419/16) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU word mark Carrera - Article 56(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 63(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Admissibility of the application for revocation - Non-challenge agreement - Decisions of the national courts - Abuse of rights - Rule 20(7)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 71(1)(a) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/1430) - Application for suspension of the proceedings before EUIPO))

(2018/C 005/43)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Carrera Brands Ltd (Hong Kong, China) (represented by: C. Markowsky, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Schifko, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Autec AG (Nuremberg, Germany) (represented by: C. Früchtl, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 June 2016 (Case R 278/2015-4), relating to revocation proceedings between Autec and Carrera Brands.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Carrera Brands Ltd to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Carrera Brands Ltd to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 343, 19.9.2016.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.2





Section 1350 Certification





In connection with the Annual Report of Anything, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Gail L. Babitt, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and




2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ Gail L. BabittAugust 22, 2012

Gail L. Babitt, Chief Financial Officer, principal financial and accounting officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.