alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Charles Lynch v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-17-00668-CR

Trial court case number: 15-CR-3172

Trial court: 405th District Court of Galveston County

Appellant’s court-appointed counsel filed a brief concluding that the abovereferenced appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S. Ct. 

1396, 1400 (1967). Appellant, acting pro se, has filed a motion requesting access to a 

copy of the appellate record for use in preparing a response to appointed counsel’s brief. 

See Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 315, 318–20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014).

We grant the motion and order the trial court clerk, no later than 10 days from 

the date of this order, to provide a copy of the record, including the clerk’s record, the 

reporter’s record, and any supplemental records, to the appellant. The trial court clerk 

shall further certify to this Court, within 15 days of the date of this order, the date upon 

which delivery of the record to the appellant is made. Finally, appellant’s response to his 

appointed counsel’s brief shall be filed within 45 days of the date of this order.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Jennifer Caughey

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: June 14, 2018
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Ronald J. Ivans,
Chief Financial Officer of the managing owner, Prudential Securities Futures Management Inc. (the Managing Owner), of World Monitor TrustSeries B (Series B), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | Series Bs Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 26, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Quarterly Report),
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Series B.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                          
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Ronald J. Ivans                                                       
|                                                                          
|Ronald J. Ivans Chief Financial Officer of the Managing Owner May 10, 2004
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

:

DOLORES (DEE) BARRETT, :

:

Plaintiff, : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. : NO. 02-4421

:

THE GREATER HATBORO CHAMBER :

OF COMMERCE, INC., et al., :

:

Defendants. :

:

NOTICE

Please be advise that the above-captioned matter shall be placed on the Court’s trial list

for Monday, September 19, 2005.

FOR THE COURT:

 

Alisa Ross

Deputy Clerk to Judge Petrese B. Tucker

(267) 299-7619

cc: A. Alberts

S. Gold

Case 2:02-cv-04421-PBT Document 37 Filed 06/13/2005 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

DOLORES and MIRO KOCAREK :

: CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-CV-4110

Plaintiffs, :

:

v. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION;

BAYER AG;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE;

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM

:

:

:

:

:

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

:

Defendants. :

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of the Court:

Kindly enter the appearances of Hope S. Freiwald, Aline Fairweather, Erin

Brennan and Kirstin J. Miller as attorneys for defendant SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a

GlaxoSmithKline.

Respectfully Submitted,

_____________________________ _____________________________

Hope S. Freiwald Aline Fairweather

_____________________________ _____________________________

Erin Brennan Kirstin J. Miller

DECHERT PRICE & RHOADS

4000 Bell Atlantic Tower

1717 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2793

(215) 994-4000

Case 2:02-cv-04110-PBT Document 9 Filed 10/02/2002 Page 1 of 1
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h
Elizabeth A. Weave r

Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathaway,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk November 23, 2009

d1116 

# Order

November 23, 2009

138973

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 138973 COA: 290613 Berrien CC: 2004-410635-FC RONNIE BOONE, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the May 8, 2009 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to meet the burden of establishing ent itlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
(Reap. Dec. 10967)

#### Ionac Chemical Co. *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 13586; 176

(Decided May 4, 1965)

*Mugene R. Piehrell*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

These two appeals for reappraisement are before me for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the Plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States that the items marked “A” and initialled JWP by Examiner John W. Painter on the invoices covered by the appeals for reappraisement herein and designated on the invoices as Zerolit 225, Zerolit G and Zerolit FF, were appraised at the following prices:

> Zerolit 225 $14.80 per pound, plus drums

> Zerolit G $46.55 per pound, plus drums

> Zerolit FF .$46.55 per pound, plus drums.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that American selling price, as that value is defined in Section 402(e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that the prices at which merchandise comparable to and competitive with Zerolit 225, Zerolit G *637and Zerolit FF, produced in the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other expenses incidental to placing the article in condition packed ready for delivery, and freely offered for sale for domestic consumption in the principal market of the United States, in the ordinary course of trade and in the usual wholesale quantities at the time of exportation of the merchandise herein, are as follows:

> Zerolit 225 $6.50 per pound, plus drums

> Zerolit G $7.50 per pound, plus drums

> Zerolit FF $7.50 per pound, plus drums.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that these appeals for re-appraisement be submitted on this stipulation.

The stipulated facts establish that the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise, indicated by the items marked “A” and initialed “JWP” on the invoices covered by the appeals for reappraisement enumerated above, is American selling price, as defined in section 402(e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 (T.D. 54165), and that the statutory values for said merchandise are as hereinabove set forth in the stipulation of submission, and I so hold.

As to all other merchandise included on the invoices covered by the entries involved herein, the appeals for reappraisement are dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

TODD WOLFSON, 

PETER FUNKE, 

MARTIN LAUTZ and 

ALISON TAYLOR, 

Plaintiffs 

v. Civil Action No. 05-2903 

CITY OF PHILADELPHIA; : JURY TRIAL DEMANDED 

OFFICER SEAN ELKINS, 

OFFICER WILLIAM GRESS, 

OFFICER KEVIN GORMAN and 

OFFICER DOE(S), 

Defendants FILED 

FEB - 1 2006 

MIC'/il:KUNZ, Clerk 

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL By, Cap. Clark 

And now, this J.if:, day of ~~ ,2006, upon application of counsel for 

all parties, and pursuant to Rule 41(a), F.R.Civ.P., Defendants Elkins, Gress and Gorman are 

dismissed as parties in the above matter. 

BY THE COURT: 

, • I 

ro:J. J-f-O~:

£,~

FM~ ;I-I-O;a', 

f,,M~

Case 2:05-cv-02903-HB Document 19 Filed 02/01/06 Page 1 of 3
2:05-cv-02903-HB 

PAUL M. MESSING 215-925-5365 

KAIRYS, RUDOVSKY, EPSTEIN & MESSING, LLP pmessing@krlawphila.com 

924 CHERRY ST. SUITE 500 

PHILADELPHIA PA 19107 

Case 2:05-cv-02903-HB Document 19 Filed 02/01/06 Page 2 of 3
*************** -COMM. JOURNAL- ******************* DATE FEB-01-2006 ***** TIME 15:15 ******** 

MODE z MEMORY TRANSM ISS ION START=FEB-01 15:14 END=FEB-01 15:15

FILE NO.=007 

STN NO. 

001 

COMM. 

OK 

ABBR 

a 

NO. STATION NAME/TEL NO. 

92159255365 

PAGES DURATION 

************************************ -CLERK'S OFFICE -

-US DISTRICT COURT 

***** -

EDPA 

- ********* 

2:05-cv-02903-HB 

PAUL M. MESSING 

KAIRYS. RUDOVSKY. EPSTEIN & MESSING, LLP 

924 CHERRY Sl', SUITE 500 

PHILADELPHIA PA 19107 

215·925-5365 

pmessing@krlawphilll.com 

_. -----------"'-----"­

Case 2:05-cv-02903-HB Document 19 Filed 02/01/06 Page 3 of 3
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1525 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1525

   To authorize the Secretary of Education to review and score TRIO 
               applications with minor budgeting errors.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 11, 2017

  Mr. Manchin introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
  referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To authorize the Secretary of Education to review and score TRIO 
               applications with minor budgeting errors.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Defending Educational Opportunities 
for West Virginia Students Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION TO REVIEW AND SCORE TRIO APPLICATIONS WITH MINOR 
              BUDGETING ERRORS.

    The Secretary of Education shall--
            (1) notify an applicant that submits an application for 
        assistance under chapter 1 of subpart 2 of part A of title IV 
        of the Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1070a-11 et 
        seq.) that has a minor budgeting error, of such error;
            (2) permit such applicant to resubmit a corrected 
        application not later than 30 days after the date of such 
        notification; and
            (3) review and score such corrected application.
                                 <all>
```
## F I FTH 

## D ISTRIC T 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE O F 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ Case No. 5D 20 23 -0781 LT Case No. 2 021- CF

- 691

_____________________________ G ARY L

. M C K ENZIE , Appellant,

v. S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________ On appeal fro m the Circuit Court for St. Johns County. R. Lee Smith , Judge. William M allory Kent , of Kent & Mc Farland, Jacksonville , for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Marissa V. Giles, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee. April 23, 202 4
P ER C URIAM . A FFIRMED . M AKAR , L AMBERT , and B OATWRIGHT , JJ., concur .2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331 .

_____________________________
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Merrill Lynch Preferred
Capital Trust III (the "Trust") and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding III, L.P.
for the period ended September 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marlene Debel,
Regular Trustee of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.





                              MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST III


                              By:  /s/  MARLENE DEBEL
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                              Name:    Marlene Debel*
                              Title:   Regular Trustee










Dated: November 13, 2009
------------------------

* Marlene Debel functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
  and Chief  Financial  Officer of the Trust for  purposes  of Section  906
  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          31,614
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                             558
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 3,800
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    532,422
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         561,998
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           561,775
<LOANS>                                        690,880
<ALLOWANCE>                                    (7,444)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,331,895
<DEPOSITS>                                     985,913
<SHORT-TERM>                                    46,607
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              8,428
<LONG-TERM>                                    222,400
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           114
<OTHER-SE>                                      68,432
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,331,895
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 15,325
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                9,407
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                    92
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                     0
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              10,338
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              13,615
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                           11,209
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      355
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 187
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  7,210
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,221
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       5,221
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,403
<EPS-BASIC>                                      $0.31
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $0.31
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.80
<LOANS-NON>                                      1,210
<LOANS-PAST>                                       900
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 6,576
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                      505
<RECOVERIES>                                        27
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                7,567
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             7,444
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY : CIVIL ACTION

:

 v. :

:

DAVID FORREST, et al. : NO. 02-4435

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of January, 2003, it is

Ordered that the CONFERENCE scheduled for February 18, 2003 at

4:30 p.m. is canceled and rescheduled for Tuesday, February 25,

2003 at 4:30 p.m.. The conference will be held in chambers, room

7613 on the 7th floor.

ATTEST: or BY THE COURT

BY: 

 Deputy Clerk Anita B. Brody, J.

Civ 12 (9/83)

Copies FAXED on _________ to: Copies MAILED on ____________ to:

Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 27 Filed 01/17/2003 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-1578

JAMES B. SKELTON,

 Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, on appeal of Roe vs Wade 1973; 

JOHN G. ROBERTS, Chief Justice and Associate Justices,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Columbia. Margaret B. Seymour, District 

Judge. (3:11-cv-00091-MBS)

Submitted: July 21, 2011 Decided: July 25, 2011

Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, 

Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James B. Skelton, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

James B. Skelton appeals the district court’s order 

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying 

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 

Skelton v. U.S. Supreme Ct., No. 3:11-cv-00091-MBS (D.S.C. 

May 26, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
                    The Schedule contains summary financial
                    information extracted from the financial
                    statements for World Monitor Trust-Series A
                    and is qualified in its entirety by reference
                    to such financial statements
</LEGEND>

<RESTATED>
<CIK>               1051822
<NAME>              World Monitor Trust-Series A
<MULTIPLIER>        1

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1999

<PERIOD-START>                  Jan-1-1999

<PERIOD-END>                    Sep-24-1999

<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-Mos

<CASH>                          16,276,904

<SECURITIES>                    (424,637)

<RECEIVABLES>                   49,461

<ALLOWANCES>                    0

<INVENTORY>                     0

<CURRENT-ASSETS>                15,901,728

<PP&E>                          0

<DEPRECIATION>                  0

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  15,901,728

<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           133,135

<BONDS>                         0

<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0

<PREFERRED>                     0

<COMMON>                        0

<OTHER-SE>                      15,768,593

<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    15,901,728

<SALES>                         0

<TOTAL-REVENUES>                (282,482)

<CGS>                           0

<TOTAL-COSTS>                   1,047,575

<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0

<LOSS-PROVISION>                0

<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0

<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0

<INCOME-TAX>                    0

<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0

<DISCONTINUED>                  0

<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0

<CHANGES>                       0

<NET-INCOME>                    (1,330,057)

<EPS-BASIC>                   (8.88)

<EPS-DILUTED>                   0

</TABLE>
:\FORMS\

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

LAURIE SWEIGARD CIVIL ACTION 

 

:

 v. :

:

CHOICE SERVICES INTERNATIONAL,

et al 

 02-2755 

 

 

 O R D E R

AND NOW, this 11TH day of JUNE, 2002, it is Ordered

that this matter is SCHEDULED for a RULE 16 conference in

chambers before the Honorable J. Curtis Joyner, on JUNE 20, 2002

at 10:30AM in Room 8TH FLOOR - room 8613. (Court Room Deputy 267-

299-7419)

PS: If counsel is not available at this time and wish to

reschedule or set up a telephone conference - that party shall

contact the Deputy Clerk and coordinate a new date and time for

all parties. 

Plaintiff is to notify all parties of this conference.

ATTEST: or BY THE COURT

BY: ANGELA J. MICKIE 

 Deputy Clerk Judge

 

Civ 12 (9/83)

Case 2:02-cv-02755-JCJ Document 4 Filed 06/11/2002 Page 1 of 1
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 6090** 

GARY LYNN PALMER , Plaintiff

– Appellant ,
v. GEORGE TRENT, North Central Regional Jail, Administrator

– Medical; IMPROPER TRAINED NURSES (ALL), which are employed h ere at North Central Regional Jail , Defendants

– Appellees
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia , at Elkins
. Robert E. Maxwell, Senior District Judge. ( 2:08

- cv - 00089

- REM

- JES )

Submitted : June 21, 2010 Decided: June 2 8 , 2010

Before MOTZ and KING , Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
. Gary Lynn Palmer, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this c ircuit.2 P ER CURIAM: Gary Lynn Palmer appeals the district court ’ s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (200 6 ) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordin gly,

we deny Palmer’s motion for records at government expense, his motion for appointment of counsel, and his motion for default judgment and affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Palmer v. Trent , No. 2:08

- cv - 00089

- REM

- JES (N.D. W. Va.
Jan . 6, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
Plaintiff’s objections to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and 1

Recommendation present no new issues and arguments. The issues and

arguments that have been set forth by such objections have been

correctly and adequately addressed by the Magistrate Judge’s Report

and Recommendation which is now approved and adopted.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ROBERT BROOKS : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. :

:

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, :

Commissioner of Social Security : NO. 05-2201

ORDER

AND NOW, this 5th day of January, 2006, upon consideration of

the pleadings and record herein, and after review of the Report and

Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Thomas J. Rueter,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s objections to the Report and Recommendation

(Doc. No. 12) are OVERRULED;

2. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED ;

1

3. The Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 8)

is DENIED;

4. The Commissioner’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No.

9) is GRANTED.

5. JUDGMENT is entered in favor of the Commissioner and

against Plaintiff.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ John R. Padova

______________________

John R. Padova, J.

Case 2:05-cv-02201-JP Document 14 Filed 01/06/06 Page 1 of 1