I am writing to request an exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b) to the extent

required for KAYLEE ADDIE to be able to use an FAA Approved Child Restraint System even though s he exceeds the weight limits for the CRS. In addition, if my petition is granted, I request that any air carrier or commercial operator operating under part 121 while KAYLEE ADDIE is aboard its aircraft is granted an exemption from 14 CFR § 121.311(b)(2)( iii)(B) to the extent necessary to allow KAYLEE ADDIE to exceed the specified weight limit for an FAA

- approved child restraint system during use of that child restraint system aboard an aircraft.

I believe the pertinent section from 14 CFR part 121 from which we seek relief is Section 121.311 Seats, safety belts, and shoulder harnesses.

KAYLEE ADDIE is 16 year’s old, weighs 120 pounds, and is 63 inches tall. KAYLEE ADDIE ’ s physical condition is as follows: CP with chronic restrictive lung disease/ spastic quadriplegia

. As a result of her physical condition, s he needs the support and security provided by an FAA Approved Chil d Restraint, but beca use of her weight is incapable of compliance with the regulation. I am also submitting the following contac t information: Mackenzie Sipiora, Make

- A

- Wish AK & WA, 811 First Ave Suite 520 Seattle WA 98104, mackenzie@akwa.wish.org

. I understand that the regulation is written to create a high level of safety for each individual passenger by ensuring that they are securely restrained in their seats during all phases of flight. The regulation also ensures that an individual does not cause harm to other passengers on the airplane by being thrown into them during turbulent or emergency conditions.

I propose that KAYLEE ADDIE be allowed to occupy an FAA Approved Child Restraint (CARES, manufactured by AmSafe, Inc.), even though s he exceeds the manufacturer’s weight limits. This ensures a high level of safety for KAYLEE ADDIE and a high level of safety for the other passengers and crew on the airplane. In fact, in KAYLEE ADDIE ’ S case, safety is greatly enhanced by the extra support and security that the FAA Approved Restraint System will provide during the entire fligh t.

Enhancing safety for KAYLEE ADDIE is in the public interest. In addition, the public interest is also served by the fact that the use of this FAA Approved ChildRestraint System allows him to use commercial air transportation. Without the

support and security of the FAA Approved Child Restraint System, he would be unable to fly commercially.

I also believe that, with certain limitations established by the FAA in a grant to this petition, there can be an equivalent level of safety to that provided by t he affected regulation. The CARES restraint has been certified by the manufacturer for use by children 22

- 44 pounds. However, the components of the CARES restraint are the same as those used in restraints for adults on aircraft and would maintain their in tegrity if used by someone who weighed several hundred pounds.

I believe that the limit of 44 pounds was established because, with the additional weight of the child attached to the seatback, the seatback would move forward more quickly in an accident scen ario and this might cause a higher HIC load for the person seated in the seat behind the passenger using the CARES restraint (because the seatback moving forward more quickly would mean that it would not be there to attenuate the energy from the impact of the person seated behind the person using the CARES restraint).

In order to achieve an equivalent level of safety as that provided by the affected regulation, I propose I propose that all operations under this exemption be conducted with at least one of KAYLEE ADDIE ’ s parents accompanying her: Michelle Addie . In addition, I propose that KAYLEE ADDIE ’ s parent must carry a copy of this exemption.

I also request that the processing of this petition not be delayed for publication and comment in the Federal Register. We want to travel OCTOBER 30 TH

- NOVEMBER 3 RD 2014, If you take the time to put this in the Federal Register, it will delay the process and we may not be able to travel in this timeframe.

If it is n ecessary to put a summary in the Federal Register, I submit the following:

This is a request for an exemption from FAR 121.311 (b) to the extent required for a child to use an FAA Approved Child Restraint System on an aircraft, even though the child exceed s the weight limits for the CRS. Due to physical challenges, without the support and security of this FAA Approved Child Restraint System, this child would be unable to fly. We request that this child be allowed to occupy an FAA Approved Child Restraint (C ARES, manufactured by AmSafe, Inc.), even though

s he exceeds the manufacturer’s weight limits of 44 pounds. In this case, the safetyof this child is greatly enhanced by the extra support and security that the FAA

Approved Restraint System will provide for him during the flight.

Thank you for your consideration of this request.

Mackenzie Sipiora

Wish Coordinator Make

- A

- Wish Alaska & WA