alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                               |                                                                                                                   |                                     |
|------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|
| February                  27, 2007 |                                                                                                              | /s/ Mark                  E. Gitter |
|                               | Mark                  E. Gitter, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (Principal Accounting                  Officer) |

----
Case 2:02-cv-02761-RBS Document 19 Filed 04/15/2003 Page 1 of 22
Case 2:02-cv-02761-RBS Document 19 Filed 04/15/2003 Page 2 of 22
Case 2:02-cv-02761-RBS Document 19 Filed 04/15/2003 Page 3 of 22
Case 2:02-cv-02761-RBS Document 19 Filed 04/15/2003 Page 4 of 22
Case 2:02-cv-02761-RBS Document 19 Filed 04/15/2003 Page 5 of 22
Case 2:02-cv-02761-RBS Document 19 Filed 04/15/2003 Page 6 of 22
Case 2:02-cv-02761-RBS Document 19 Filed 04/15/2003 Page 7 of 22
Case 2:02-cv-02761-RBS Document 19 Filed 04/15/2003 Page 8 of 22
Case 2:02-cv-02761-RBS Document 19 Filed 04/15/2003 Page 9 of 22
Case 2:02-cv-02761-RBS Document 19 Filed 04/15/2003 Page 10 of 22
Case 2:02-cv-02761-RBS Document 19 Filed 04/15/2003 Page 11 of 22
Case 2:02-cv-02761-RBS Document 19 Filed 04/15/2003 Page 12 of 22
Case 2:02-cv-02761-RBS Document 19 Filed 04/15/2003 Page 13 of 22
Case 2:02-cv-02761-RBS Document 19 Filed 04/15/2003 Page 14 of 22
Case 2:02-cv-02761-RBS Document 19 Filed 04/15/2003 Page 15 of 22
Case 2:02-cv-02761-RBS Document 19 Filed 04/15/2003 Page 16 of 22
Case 2:02-cv-02761-RBS Document 19 Filed 04/15/2003 Page 17 of 22
Case 2:02-cv-02761-RBS Document 19 Filed 04/15/2003 Page 18 of 22
Case 2:02-cv-02761-RBS Document 19 Filed 04/15/2003 Page 19 of 22
Case 2:02-cv-02761-RBS Document 19 Filed 04/15/2003 Page 20 of 22
Case 2:02-cv-02761-RBS Document 19 Filed 04/15/2003 Page 21 of 22
Case 2:02-cv-02761-RBS Document 19 Filed 04/15/2003 Page 22 of 22
_________________________________________ 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court 

Lansing, Michigan 

May 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 130341 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Justices 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 130341 

 COA: 254642 
 Wayne CC: 03-013742-01 

JAMES ORDELL KEYS, JR., 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 6, 2005 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

KELLY, J., would remand this case for resentencing. 

d0524 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

May 31, 2006 

Clerk
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                          69,772
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,728
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,616
<INVENTORY>                                     46,711
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               154,551
<PP&E>                                          61,284
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,558
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 221,294
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           34,437
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      3,990
<COMMON>                                       140,852
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   221,294
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                87,319
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   51,971
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,680
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 11,673
<INCOME-TAX>                                     4,446
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              7,227
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     7,227
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .34


</TABLE>
Case 2:02-cv-02761-RBS Document 13 Filed 01/08/2003 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 23

CONSENT OF
INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No.
333-58324, No. 333-90076, No.  333-105788 and No. 333-110068) and on Form S-3 (No.
333-105789 and No. 333-109057) of Agere Systems Inc. of our report dated October  28,
2003 relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule, which appears
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

/s/
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Florham Park,
New Jersey  December 5, 2003
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 29, 2021

No. 04-18-00411-CV

REPSOL OIL AND GAS USA, LLC as successor of Talisman Energy USA Inc, Statoil Texas 

Onshore Properties, LLC, and Statoil Pipelines, LLC, and OGE, LLC,

Appellants

v.

MATRIX PETROLEUM, LLC, Matrix Petroleum Holdings LLC, JAR Resources Holdings, 

L.P., and TMRX Petroleum, LLC,

Appellees

From the 218th Judicial District Court, La Salle County, Texas

Trial Court No. 14-08-00158-CVL

Honorable Russell Wilson, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

On January 20, 2021, appellees/cross-appellants OGE, LLC and Matrix Petroleum, LLC, Matrix 

Petroleum Holdings LLC, JAR Resources Holdings L.P., and TMRX Petroleum, LLC filed a Conditional 

Motion for Leave to File a Sur-Reply to Repsol’s Reply. The motion is GRANTED.

It is so ORDERED on this 29th day of January, 2021.

 PER CURIAM

 ATTESTED TO: _______________________________

 MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
Exhibit 13.1

Officer Certifications

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States
Code), each of the undersigned officers of América Móvil, S.A.B. de C.V., a sociedad anónima bursátil de capital variable organized under the laws of Mexico (the Company), does hereby certify to such
officers knowledge that:

The annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 (the Form 20-F)
of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Dated: June 10, 2008



/s/ DANIEL HAJJ
ABOUMRADName: Daniel Hajj AboumradTitle: Chief Executive Officer


Dated: June 10, 2008



/s/ CARLOS
JOSÉ GARCÍA MORENO ELIZONDOName: Carlos José García Moreno ElizondoTitle: Chief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2017283EN.01003901.xml

| 28.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 283/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 283/39

---

Judgment of the General Court of 20 July 2017 — Barnett and Mogensen v Commission

(Case T-148/16) (1)

1

((Appeal - Cross-appeal - Civil Service - Officials - Pensions - Adaptation of the weightings - Interim update - Adversely affecting act - Admissibility of the cross-appeal - Article 65(4) of the Staff Regulations - Update for 2014 - Sensitivity threshold concerning the progression of the cost of living))

(2017/C 283/58)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellants: Adrian Barnett (Roskilde, Denmark) and Sven-Ole Mogensen (Hellerup, Denmark) (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyers)

Appellants:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: G. Gattinara and F. Simonetti, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 5 February 2016, Barnett and Mogensen v Commission (F-56/15, EU:F:2016:11) seeking to have that judgment set aside.

Barnett and Mogensen

Commission

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal and the cross-appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal and the cross-appeal;

| 2. | Orders Messrs Adrian Barnett and Sven-Ole Mogensen to bear their own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Commission in the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Messrs Adrian Barnett and Sven-Ole Mogensen to bear their own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Commission in the appeal;

| 3. | Orders the Commission to bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by Messrs Barnett and Mogensen in the cross-appeal. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Commission to bear its own costs and pay the costs incurred by Messrs Barnett and Mogensen in the cross-appeal.

---

(1)  OJ C 191, 30.5.2016.

1

---
No. 57944.

protest 219250-K (New York).

#### Trans World Shipping Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

An examination of the official papers failing to disclose any reason for disturbing the action of the collector, which was presumptively correct, the protest was overruled.
STEAM ELECTRIC CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE 

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819 

DCN: SE01755

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
# C_2019103EN.01002202.xml

| 18.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 103/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/22

---

Judgment of the General Court of 7 February 2019 — Arango Jaramillo and Others v EIB

(Case T-487/16) (1)

((Civil service - EIB staff - Pensions - 2008 Reform - Increase in the rate of contributions - Subsequent pay slips - No act adversely affecting an official - Inadmissibility))

(2019/C 103/28)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Oscar Orlando Arango Jaramillo (Luxembourg, Luxembourg), and the 33 other applicants whose names are listed in the annex to the judgment (represented by B. Cortese, C. Cortese and F. Spitaleri, lawyers)

Defendant: European Investment Bank (represented initially by C. Gómez de la Cruz, T. Gilliams and G. Nuvoli and subsequently by T. Gilliams, G. Faedo and J. Klein, acting as Agents, and by P.-E. Partsch)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU and Article 50a of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union and seeking, first, annulment of the ‘decisions’ of the EIB, contained in the applicants’ pay slips for February 2011, to increase the rate of their contributions to the pension scheme from 9 % to 10 % and, secondly, an order that the EIB pay a symbolic EUR 1 by way of compensation for the non-material damage allegedly suffered by the applicants.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action as inadmissible.

| 2. | Orders Mr Oscar Orlando Arango Jaramillo and the other staff of the European Investment Bank (EIB) listed in the Annex to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the EIB. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Oscar Orlando Arango Jaramillo and the other staff of the European Investment Bank (EIB) listed in the Annex to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the EIB.

---

(1)  OJ C 211, 16.7.2011 (case initially registered before the European Union Civil Service Tribunal under Case No F-58/11 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on1.9.2016).

---
Case 2:02-cv-02761-RBS Document 15 Filed 01/08/2003 Page 1 of 1
# C_2017392EN.01004004.xml

| 20.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 392/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 392/40

---

Order of the General Court of 26 September 2017 — Scheffler v EUIPO — Doc Generici (docfauna)

(Case T-299/16) (1)

1

(2017/C 392/52)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 296, 16.8.2016.

1

---
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

MICHAEL ANDRE JACKSON, )

a/k/a MICHAEL A. JACKSON, JR., )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D18-101

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed December 14, 2018. 

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk 

County; Wayne M. Durden, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and 

Richard Sanders, Assistant Public Defender, 

Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, 

Tallahassee, and Donna S. Koch, Assistant 

Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

LaROSE, C.J., and VILLANTI and SLEET, JJ., Concur.
No. 65347.

#### Royal Sales Co., Inc., and Royal Sales Company *v.*United States,

protests 58/22881 and 58/22882 (Louisville).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of carrizo baskets the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Chester K. Stoner*v. *United States*(42 Cust. Ct. 178, C.D. 2083), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
# Spreadsheet

# Beginning

New Budgetary Authority (Gross), Detail[1]

[1] For purposes of this scenario, budget authority is classified as discretionary.
Exhibit 21
Agere SubsidiariesJurisdiction ofDomestic Companies

OrganizationAgere Systems American Parkway, L.P.
DelawareAgere Systems Asia Pacific Inc.
DelawareAgere Systems EMEA Inc.
DelawareAgere Systems Holdings Inc.
DelawareAgere Systems International LLC
DelawareAgere Systems LVCC LLC
DelawareAgere Systems Management Services Inc.
DelawareMustang Acquisition Corp.
DelawareForeign CompaniesAgere Systems Australia Pty Ltd.
AustraliaAgere Systems (Shanghai) Co. Ltd.
ChinaAgere Systems Trading (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
ChinaAgere Systems Canada Corp.
CanadaAgere Systems Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG
GermanyAgere Systems Deutschland Verwaltungs GmbH
GermanyAgere Systems Espana SL
SpainAgere Systems Hong Kong Ltd.
Hong KongAgere Systems India Private Limited
IndiaAgere Systems Japan Ltd.
JapanAgere Systems Korea Ltd.
KoreaAgere Systems Limited
U.K.Agere Systems Microelectronics (Thai) Ltd.
ThailandAgere Systems Nederland B.V.
NetherlandsAgere Systems Singapore Pte. Ltd.
SingaporeAgere Systems Investments Pte. Ltd.
SingaporeAgere Systems (Ireland) Limited
IrelandAgere Systems (Ireland) Design Limited
IrelandAgere Systems (Ireland) International Limited
IrelandAgere Systems (Ireland) Research Limited
IrelandAgere Systems (Spain) Technologies S.L.
SpainModem-Art Ltd.
Israel


---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5


<LEGEND>


EXHIBIT 27 - Financial Data Schedule

THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS INCLUDED IN
THE  REGISTRANT'S  FORM 10-QSB FOR THE 3 MONTHS ENDED  SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    sep-30-2000
<CASH>                                  2,188,595
<SECURITIES>                            0
<RECEIVABLES>                           4,364,743
<ALLOWANCES>                            480,089
<INVENTORY>                             5,861,373
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        13,112,552
<PP&E>                                  6,379,497
<DEPRECIATION>                          3,317,317
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          17,764,043
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   8,929,013
<BONDS>                                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                   0
<PREFERRED>                             0
<COMMON>                                5,182,976
<OTHER-SE>                              2,012,376
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            17,764,043
<SALES>                                 16,484,578
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        16,484,578
<CGS>                                   10,176,029
<TOTAL-COSTS>                           5,586,921
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                        0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                        0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                      324,171
<INCOME-PRETAX>                         397,457
<INCOME-TAX>                            95,439
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                     302,018
<DISCONTINUED>                          0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<CHANGES>                               0
<NET-INCOME>                            302,018
<EPS-BASIC>                             0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                           (.11)



</TABLE>
Exhibit
      32.2










**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Report”) of I.D. Systems,
      Inc. (the “Corporation”) for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Ned Mavrommatis,
      Chief
      Financial Officer of the Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as
      adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge,
      that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation.





Dated: March 16, 2007
                /s/
                  Ned MavrommatisName: Ned MavrommatisTitle: Chief Financial
                  Officer





The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter
      63
      of Title 18, United States Code) and is not being filed as part of the Report
      or
      as a separate disclosure document.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to the Corporation and will be retained by
      the
      Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
      staff
      upon request.
Teacher Retirement Sydm of lb%aa **hEtin, -**  **T6%6:** Dear Sir: Kttentioar-Mr. K. E. Davis Opinion I?cGO

-l& Ret Teacher Retirement System -- Eaneficiary-- hembar designation under assumedname. Your question for a legal opinion from this department is as follows: "May a member of the Teacher Retimm6nt System legally designatea beneficiary to receive the amount of hi6 aoomaulated aoatributions in case of hi6 d66th before Mtirament by using as his signaturea name other than his legalname? "The abuse question is prompted by the follorring aircum&anoar a Personal Data Form ha6 be6n issued to I&v.Johu x. SlaVik, amember of the Teaoher Reti.rmncnt; Systemwhose aooount ia being carriedunder that name. This Form contains a section that enables a member to designate a beneficiary to receive the amount of his aaaumulated contributions in aase of his death before retirtaneat.Mr. Slavik informs us that JohnM. Slavik i6 not his legal name but is the nam6 he has been known by ainae Shorbly after his birth at whioh time hismother remarried. There ha6 be6n no action taken in aonneationwith changinghis legal name, John RudolfMazooh to JohnP. Slavik. It is his desire, honever, to designatea beneficiary over his signature as JohnM. Slavik, if such actionvuuld be held legal." Ohioexecution,whether of contract, conveyanae,receipt or instrument whatsoever,under a fiatitious or assumed nam6 is a8 valid and binding in law a6 though he had exeouted in his legal name. It is a question of identity. If the persolr executing is the per6on t6 be bound, then he is bound by whatever name h6 exeoutes. It 088make no differenoewhether the arsumed name is a fictitiousname or that of another person. (SOTex. Jur. 692, Sea. 11). Neither oan itmake any differenoe a8 to why, or the r6asona for the us6 of a fiotitious

### or assumedname. One who ia unable to write hi6 name may neverbhelessvalidly exeaute by hismark or any character indicating hi6 intentionto execute. Such instrumentsexeouted in any of the mode6 abovementioned are not only binding upon the party exaouting but they ar6 likewise bind4 upon th6 other parby to the inatI%aent. In stherwords, the instrwwnt 16 in all respactsvalid and enforoaable aeo6Yding to its legal purport and effeot.Teacher Retirament System of Texss -Page 2 O-1864

very truly yours A;p1ORNR~GENERALOFTEXkS
**6/** Ooie Spear

By Ooie Sper AaaiEtaut

APPROVED Jan 27j 1940
**6/** Ge,rald

C. 8-k6I ~GESALDC.MbNN ATTONNEY GENEWU OF '!fF.XhS &PPROVED OPINION UWMITX'EE EX EL 111. B. CHARIMAN