alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2
 
 **CERTIFICATIONS**
 
 I, Stanley Tepper, certify that:
 
 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Family Room entertainment Corporation (the "Company");
 
 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; and
 
 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.
 
 4. The Company's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company and have:
 
 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its
 consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;
 
 b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
 period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c) disclosed in this report any change in the Company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
 to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting;
 
 5. The Company's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Company's auditors and the audit committee of Company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions);
 
 a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
 Company's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
 
 b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company's internal controls over financial reporting.
 
 Date: October 13, 2004
 /s/ Stanley TepperStanley Tepper
Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 156 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 156

To require the Secretary of the Treasury to implement security measures 
in the electronic tax return filing process to prevent tax refund fraud 
         from being perpetrated with electronic identity theft.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 17, 2017

   Mr. Rubio introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
                  referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Secretary of the Treasury to implement security measures 
in the electronic tax return filing process to prevent tax refund fraud 
         from being perpetrated with electronic identity theft.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. IMPLEMENTATION OF SECURITY MEASURES IN ELECTRONIC TAX RETURN 
              FILING PROCESS TO PREVENT TAX REFUND FRAUD.

    The Secretary of the Treasury, or the Secretary's designee, shall 
implement security measures in the electronic tax return filing process 
designed to prevent tax refund fraud from being perpetrated through the 
use of electronic identity theft. Such measures shall include the use 
of security questions which allow for electronic matching of the 
answers to such questions to establish the identity of the taxpayer 
before the electronic filing of a tax return by such taxpayer.
                                 <all>
```
Before the Third Division

January 16, 1950

No. 53945.

#### The Josebra Company *v.*United States,

protest 126422-K/75537 (San Francisco).

Ekwall, Judge:

This ease is before us on a motion by defendant to set aside an order granting a motion to amend the protest, which was granted by the judge presiding at the hearing at the port of San Francisco. The facts as they appear of record are identical with those involved in the motion to amend protest 117513-K, decided January 11, 1950, and reported in Abstract 53914, with the exception that the motion to amend in the instant case was granted. For the reasons set forth in the decision above cited we deny the motion to vacate the order granting the motion to amend.'
No. 67764.

#### Rex Sales Company and H. B. Thomas & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 61/20601, etc. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *Falcon Sales Company*and *J. J. Murphy & Co.*v. *United States*(47 Cust. Ct. 129, C.D. 2292), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Exhibit 32.1

Statement of Chief Executive Officer Furnished Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, Kim S. Price, is the President and Chief Executive Officer of Citizens South Banking Corporation (the Company).

This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the Company of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the Report).

By execution of this statement, I certify that to the best of my knowledge:

| | A) | the Report   fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the   Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and                                                               
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
| | B) | the   information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material   respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as   of the dates and for the periods covered by the Report.

|November 7,   2006 | /s/ Kim S.   Price                     
|------------------ | ---------------------------------------
|Dated              |                                        
|                   | Kim S. Price                           
|                   | President   and Chief Executive Officer

This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  It is not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Citizens South Banking Corporation and will be retained by Citizens South Banking Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Before the Third Division,

January 24, 1945

No. 49973.

#### Petition 6216-R of Geo. Wm. Rueff, Inc. (New Orleans).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

When the case was called for trial the petitioner introduced the testimony of two witnesses, an employee of petitioner and the Government examiner at the port of New Orleans. The respondent called two customs agents and a customs broker. It appeared that the petitioner had interviewed the customs examiner who suggested that entry be made at the invoice price and that petitioner write for further information from'the importers. Petitioner pursued this course but received a price list after the appraisement had been made and it was too late to amend the entry. He testified that the difference in the entered and appraised values was one-quarter of 1 cent per pound charged extra for clipping. The Government examiner testified that the reputation of the petitioner was good. One of the customs agents testified that in the course of his investigation he found an earlier entry had been filed for the same importer and the same type of merchandise 2 months prior to the entries involved herein, and that the broker had accepted the price given by the examiner. There was testimony by customs agents to the effect that petitioner had a reputation for careless, ness. Efowever, it was also brought out by the testimony that as to this, there was a difference of opinion.

From the record the court held that the petitioner in making entry was without intention to defraud the revenue of the United States or deceive its officials, and that even if said petitioner had been careless in making the entries, that, of itself, would not be sufficient to impute to him an intent to defraud. *(United States v. Fish,*268 U. S. 607, affirming *Fish*v. *United States,*12 Ct. Cust. Appls. 307, T. D. 40315, cited.) The petition was therefore granted._
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT

TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Duska Therapeutics, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB, for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Amir Pelleg, Ph.D., President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.



|                      
|----------------------
|/s/ Amir Pelleg, Ph.D.
|Amir Pelleg, Ph. D    
|President             

March 31, 2006
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIDDK FORWARD Urology Applications.                    

*Date:*                         March 6, 2024.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications and/or proposals.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, NIDDK, Democracy II, Suite 7000A, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892, (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Ryan G. Morris, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, NIDDK, National Institutes of Health, Room 7015, 6707 Democracy Boulevard, Bethesda, MD 20892-2542, 301-594-4721,                         *ryan.morris@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.847, Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolic Research; 93.848, Digestive Diseases and Nutrition Research; 93.849, Kidney Diseases, Urology and Hematology Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: November 3, 2023.

Miguelina Perez, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-24751 Filed 11-8-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
EPA SANITIZED Page 1 of 6
EPA SANITIZED Page 2 of 6
 

 

 

 

 

EPA SANITIZED Page 3 of 6
 

EPA SANITIZED Page 4 of 6
EPA SANITIZED Page 5 of 6
EPA SANITIZED Page 6 of 6
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1356 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the use of Post-9/ 

11 Educational Assistance to pursue independent study programs at 

certain educational institutions that are not institutions of higher learning, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 14, 2017 

Mr. INHOFE (for himself and Mr. CORNYN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to authorize the 

use of Post-9/11 Educational Assistance to pursue independent study programs at certain educational institutions that are not institutions of higher learning, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Education 

5 Improvement Act of 2017’’. 


rfrederick on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1356 IS

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION FOR USE OF POST-9/11 EDU2 CATIONAL ASSISTANCE TO PURSUE INDE3 PENDENT STUDY PROGRAMS AT CERTAIN 

4 EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS THAT ARE NOT 

5 INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER LEARNING. 

6 Paragraph (4) of section 3680A(a) of title 38, United 

7 States Code, is amended to read as follows: 

8 ‘‘(4) any independent study program except— 

9 ‘‘(A) with respect to enrollments occurring 

10 during the period beginning on the date of the 

11 enactment of the Veterans Education Improve12 ment Act of 2017 and ending on September 30, 

13 2018, an independent study program (including 

14 open circuit television) that— 

15 ‘‘(i) is accredited by a nationally rec16 ognized accrediting agency; and 

17 ‘‘(ii) leads— 

18 ‘‘(I) to a standard college degree; 

19 ‘‘(II) to a certificate that reflects 

20 educational attainment offered by an 

21 institution of higher learning; or 

22 ‘‘(III) to a certificate that re23 flects completion of a course of study 

24 offered by— 

25 ‘‘(aa) an area career and 

26 technical education school (as deVerDate Sep 11 2014 01:11 Jun 20, 2017 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S1356.IS S1356

rfrederick on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1356 IS

1 fined in subparagraphs (C) and 

2 (D) of section 3(3) of the Carl D. 

3 Perkins Career and Technical 

4 Education Act of 2006 (20 

5 U.S.C. 2302(3))) that provides 

6 education at the postsecondary 

7 level; or 

8 ‘‘(bb) a postsecondary voca9 tional institution (as defined in 

10 section 102(c) of the Higher 

11 Education Act of 1965 (20 

12 U.S.C. 1002(c))) that provides 

13 education at the postsecondary 

14 level; and 

15 ‘‘(B) with respect to enrollments occurring 

16 during any period other than the period de17 scribed in subparagraph (A), an accredited 

18 independent study program (including open cir19 cuit television) leading— 

20 ‘‘(i) to a standard college degree; or 

21 ‘‘(ii) to a certificate that reflects edu22 cational attainment offered by an institu23 tion of higher learning.’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Berle M. Schiller 5614 United States Courthouse

 JUDGE Independence Mall West

 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106

 

 267-299-7620

 

September 30, 2002 

Re: Anna Mae Johnson v. Unum Life Insurance Co., et al.

Docket No. 02-cv-4368

Dear Counsel:

Judge Schiller has scheduled the above-referenced case for a Rule 16 conference for

Wednesday, October 30, 2002 at 8:30 A.M. in his chambers, Room 5614.

Counsel are directed to obtain copies of Judge Schiller’s “Scheduling Policy Statement”

and “Conference Information Report” from the Court’s website at http:www.paed.uscourts.gov. 

You should review the Scheduling Policy Statement before completing the Conference

Information Report. Please bring the completed Conference Information Report with you to the

Rule 16 Conference.

At the close of the conference, you will receive an Order from Judge Schiller that will list

firm dates for the completion of discovery, other pretrial submissions and trial that will be set at

the conference

Very truly yours,

Patricia A. Callahan

Deputy Clerk to

Hon. Berle M. Schiller

(267)299-7621

Case 2:02-cv-04368-BMS Document 11 Filed 09/30/2002 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 873 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 873

  Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 129) 
  providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Federal Communications 
         Commission relating to ``Restoring Internet Freedom''.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2018

     Mr. Michael F. Doyle of Pennsylvania submitted the following 
        resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Providing for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 129) 
  providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Federal Communications 
         Commission relating to ``Restoring Internet Freedom''.

    Resolved, That immediately upon adoption of this resolution the 
House shall resolve into the Committee of the Whole House on the State 
of the Union for consideration of the joint resolution (H.J. Res. 129) 
providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, 
United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Federal Communications 
Commission relating to ``Restoring Internet Freedom''. The first 
reading of the joint resolution shall be dispensed with. All points of 
order against consideration of the joint resolution are waived. General 
debate shall be confined to the joint resolution and shall not exceed 
one hour equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking 
minority member of the Committee on Energy and Commerce. After general 
debate the joint resolution shall be considered for amendment under the 
five-minute rule. All points of order against provisions in the joint 
resolution are waived. At the conclusion of consideration of the joint 
resolution for amendment the Committee shall rise and report the joint 
resolution to the House with such amendments as may have been adopted. 
The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the joint 
resolution and amendments thereto to final passage without intervening 
motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions. If 
the Committee of the Whole rises and reports that it has come to no 
resolution on the joint resolution, then on the next legislative day 
the House shall, immediately after the third daily order of business 
under clause 1 of rule XIV, resolve into the Committee of the Whole for 
further consideration of the joint resolution.
    Sec. 2.  Clause 1(c) of rule XIX shall not apply to the 
consideration of House Joint Resolution 129.
                                 <all>
```