alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2019072EN.01001602.xml

| 25.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 72/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 72/16

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 December 2018 — Makhlouf v Council

(Case T-409/16) (1)

((Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken against Syria - Freezing of funds - Rights of the defence - Right to effective judicial protection - Obligation to state reasons - Manifest error of assessment - Right to reputation - Right to property - Presumption of innocence - Restriction on entry into and transit through the territory of the European Union - Proportionality))

(2019/C 72/20)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Ehab Makhlouf (Damascus, Syria) (represented by: E. Ruchat, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: initially, S. Kyriakopoulou, G. Étienne and A. Vitro, subsequently S. Kyriakopoulou and A. Vitro, and finally S. Kyriakopoulou, A. Vitro and V. Piessevaux, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/850 of 27 May 2016 amending Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2016 L 141, p. 125) and of the subsequent measures giving effect to that decision, of Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/917 of 29 May 2017 amending Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2017 L 139, p. 62), and of Council Decision (CFSP) 2018/778 of 28 May 2018 amending Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2018 L 131, p. 16), in so far as those acts concern the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Ehab Makhlouf to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Ehab Makhlouf to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ C 371, 10.10.2016.

---
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-14-0000934 04-DEC-2014 08:32 AM
85 NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 3. Accounts Receivable, Net

Accounts Receivable, Net as of September 30, 2020, and 2019

(In billions of dollars) 2020 2019

Accounts receivable:

Gross accounts receivable.......................................................................... 113.0 117.7

Allowance for uncollectible amounts ............................................................ (35.0) (31.8)

Accounts receivable, net............................................................................. 78.0 85.9

Taxes receivable:

Gross taxes receivable ............................................................................... 441.9 383.7

Allowance for uncollectible amounts ............................................................ (198.7) (231.6)

Taxes receivable, net ................................................................................. 243.2 152.1

Total accounts receivable, net .................................................................. 321.2 238.0

Gross accounts receivable includes related interest receivable of $2.8 billion and $3.3 billion as of September 30, 2020, 

and 2019, respectively. Taxes receivable is listed separately above due to being the significant portion of total accounts 

receivable. Amounts for FY 2019 have been changed as a result of a mapping update to the individual lines Taxes receivable: 

Gross taxes receivable and Allowance for uncollectible amounts. Each line increased $2.2 billion resulting in a net zero 

impact to the total. This change in presentation was due to a mapping update of tax-related interest receivable, penalties, fines 

and administrative fees, and allowance for loss.

Treasury comprises approximately 74.0 percent of the government’s reported accounts receivable, net, as of September 

30, 2020. Treasury experienced a year-to-year increase of $91.7 billion primarily due to taxes receivable. This is principally 

due to a one-time tax on previously unrepatriated foreign earnings at lower rates that taxpayers may elect to pay over several 

years pursuant to the TCJA, coupled with a decrease in the related allowance for uncollectible taxes receivable due to a 

change in the methodology for estimating collectability, and the CARES Act Section 2302 provision allowing employers to 

defer payment of FICA Social Security taxes. Refer to Treasury’s financial statements for additional information. The 

following list of entities comprise 99.1 percent of the government’s accounts receivable, net, of $321.2 billion as of 

September 30, 2020. Please refer to the following entities’ financial statements for additional information on gross accounts 

receivable and the related allowance for uncollectible amounts:

 

• Treasury • PBGC • NCUA

• HHS • USDA • USPS 

• SSA • DOE • HUD

• DHS • OPM • FCC

• DOI • FDIC • FTC

• DOD • DOL • CFTC

• VA • TVA
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-02-00550-CV

NL Industries, Inc./James A. Howard, Special Deputy Receiver of Texas Employers 

Insurance Association, Appellants

v.

James A. Howard, Special Deputy Receiver of Texas Employers Insurance

Association/NL Industries, Inc., Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 98TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. GN000738, HONORABLE DARLENE BYRNE, JUDGE PRESIDING 

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant and Cross-Appellee NL Industries, Inc. and Appellee/Cross-Appellant James A. 

Howard, Special Deputy Receiver of Texas Employers Insurance Association, have settled this case and 

have jointly moved to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a). We grant the motion and dismiss 

the appeal.

 

Jan P. Patterson, Justice

Before Justices Kidd, Yeakel and Patterson

Dismissed on Joint Motion
Filed: June 12, 2003
**Exhibit
      10.19**





**MARINE
      PRODUCTS**





**FIRST
      AMENDMENT TO**


**2001
      EMPLOYEE STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN**


**AND**


**2004
      STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN**





Marine
      Products Corporation (the "Company"), a corporation organized under the laws
      of
      the State of Delaware, by resolution of its Board of Directors has adopted
      this
      First Amendment to its 2001 Employee Stock Incentive Plan and the 2004 Stock
      Incentive Plan (the "Plans"), effective as of July 25, 2006.





1. Each
      of
      the Plans is hereby amended to the extent necessary to provide as
      follows:





If
      the
      outstanding shares of common stock of Marine Products Corporation (the
“Company”) are changed into or exchanged for a different number or kind of
      shares or other securities of the Company by reason of any recapitalization,
      reclassification, stock split, stock dividend, combination or subdivision of
      the
      common stock of the Company, or similar transaction involving the outstanding
      equity interests in the Company (each, a “Change in Capitalization”), then,
      subject to any required action by the stockholders of the Company, the number
      and kind of shares of Company stock underlying each stock option, restricted
      stock award, or other equity award (and, where applicable, the exercise price
      per share) shall be proportionately and equitably adjusted for any increase
      or
      decrease in the number of issued shares of the Company resulting from a Change
      in Capitalization, such adjustments to be effected in the manner reasonably
      determined by the Committee. Notwithstanding the foregoing, no fractional shares
      shall be issued in making the foregoing adjustments. This provision shall be
      effective immediately upon adoption by the Board of Directors and apply to
      all
      currently outstanding equity awards under each of the Plans.





2. All
      provisions of the Plans remain in effect except to the extent superseded by
      the
      foregoing.




IN
      WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board has caused this Plan to be executed by a duly
      authorized officer of the Company as of the date set forth above.




MARINE
      PRODUCTS
      CORPORATION









By: 
      /s/ Ben M.
      Palmer


Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 140 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                        Calendar No. 20
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 140

                           [Report No. 115-7]

 To amend the White Mountain Apache Tribe Water Rights Quantification 
 Act of 2010 to clarify the use of amounts in the WMAT Settlement Fund.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 12, 2017

 Mr. Flake (for himself and Mr. McCain) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs

                             March 21, 2017

               Reported by Mr. Hoeven, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the White Mountain Apache Tribe Water Rights Quantification 
 Act of 2010 to clarify the use of amounts in the WMAT Settlement Fund.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. USE OF FUNDS IN WMAT SETTLEMENT FUND FOR WMAT RURAL WATER 
              SYSTEM.

    (a) Authorization of WMAT Rural Water System.--Section 307(a) of 
the White Mountain Apache Tribe Water Rights Quantification Act of 2010 
(Public Law 111-291; 124 Stat. 3080) is amended in the matter preceding 
paragraph (1) by inserting ``, (b)(2),'' after ``subsections (a)''.
    (b) Funding.--Section 312(b)(2)(C)(i)(III) of the White Mountain 
Apache Tribe Water Rights Quantification Act of 2010 (Public Law 111-
291; 124 Stat. 3093) is amended by striking the period at the end and 
inserting the following: ``, including the planning, design, and 
construction of the WMAT rural water system, in accordance with section 
307(a).''.
                                                        Calendar No. 20

115th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 140

                           [Report No. 115-7]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To amend the White Mountain Apache Tribe Water Rights Quantification 
 Act of 2010 to clarify the use of amounts in the WMAT Settlement Fund.

_______________________________________________________________________

                             March 21, 2017

                       Reported without amendment
```
No. 50386.

#### Protest 97963-K of Italian Furniture Frames Corp. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

At the trial plaintiff testified that the merchandise’ in question was found by him in an unexamined case but admitted that he did not claim shortage on the public store case. Government counsel contended that due to noncompliance with article 813, Customs Regulations of 1937, governing shortage in unexamined packages, there can be no recovery herein. Under the rulings laid down in *Joseph Dixon Crucible Co.*v. *United States*(14 Cust. Ct. 71. C. D. 914, and Abstract 50268, it was found that thet importer’s failure to comply with the regulations does not preclude him from recovery where, as in the instant case, sufficient evidence has been produced to sustain the claim that the merchandise found in excess was enumerated on an invoice in an unexamíned case and that duty was paid upon the same. The protest was therefore sustained.
# C_2018094EN.01003601.xml

| 12.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/36

---

Order of the General Court of 16 January 2018 — PC v EASO

(Case T-610/16) (1)

1

(2018/C 094/47)

Language of the case: Finnish

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 269, 14.8.2017.

1

---
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

For purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Roger K. Brooks, the Chairman
of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of AmerUs Group Co. (the
Company), hereby certifies that:



| | (i)  |  | the Quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter
ended September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Commission Act of 1934; and
| | ---- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (ii) |  | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.                                                                                                                                                   

|                        | 
|----------------------- | 
|/s/ Roger K. Brooks     | 
|                        | 
|Roger K. Brooks         | 
|Chairman, President and | 
|Chief Executive Officer | 
|AmerUs Group Co.        | 

Dated: November 7, 2003

49
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Nos. 1D17-1207

1D17-1397

(Consolidated for disposition)

_____________________________

FLORIDA FARM BUREAU 

CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY

and FLORIDA FARM BUREAU 

GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY,

Florida corporations,

Appellants,

v.

MAY NURSERY, INC., NATHAN 

WILDER, and DAMARLON DEON 

DEBOSE,

Appellees.

___________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court for Gadsden County.

Francis J. Allman, Judge.

September 18, 2018

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

RAY, BILBREY, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.
2

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Caryn L. Bellus and Barbara E. Fox of Kubicki Draper, P.A., 

Miami, for Appellants.

William D. Horgan and J. Breck Brannen of Pennington, P.A., 

Tallahassee, for Appellees May Nursery, Inc. and Nathan Wilder. 

No appearance for Damarlon Debose.
Exhibit 13.1



Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title
18, United States Code)



Pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of América Móvil, S.A. de C.V., a sociedad anónima de capital variableorganized under the laws of Mexico (the Company), does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:



The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 of the Company (the Form 20-F) fully complies with the requirements
of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |                                        |  |        |  |                                   
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------------------- |  | ------ |  | ----------------------------------
|                     |  | 
|Dated: June 30, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ Daniel Hajj Aboumrad              
|                     |  |  |  |                                        |  | Name:  |  | Daniel Hajj Aboumrad              
|                     |  |  |  |                                        |  | Title: |  | Chief Executive Officer           
|                     |  | 
|Dated: June 30, 2005 |  |  |  | /s/ Carlos José García Moreno Elizondo
|                     |  |  |  |                                        |  | Name:  |  | Carlos José García Moreno Elizondo
|                     |  |  |  |                                        |  | Title: |  | Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit E 

Case 2:05-cv-01099-ER Document 112-5 Filed 07/21/15 Page 1 of 3
Source: https://twitter.com/itweatyou/status/434012252383887360 

Source: https://twitter.com/itweatyou/status/440300468124663808 

Case 2:05-cv-01099-ER Document 112-5 Filed 07/21/15 Page 2 of 3
 2 

Source: https://twitter.com/itweatyou/status/618157229368324096 

Source: https://twitter.com/itweatyou/status/618157533014962176 

Case 2:05-cv-01099-ER Document 112-5 Filed 07/21/15 Page 3 of 3
| **VA Home Page****Public Affairs & Special Events Home Page****Press Releases****Fact Sheets****Biographies****Special Events****Feature Items**
State Summaries published in 2004 contain information through        December 31, 2003. 

State names shown in green italic  have been published in 2004. 
AlabamaIllinoisMontanaPuerto              Rico (Cmnwlth.)AlaskaIndianaNebraskaRhode                IslandArizonaIowaNevadaSouth                CarolinaArkansasKansasNew              HampshireSouth                DakotaCaliforniaKentuckyNew              JerseyTennesseeColoradoLouisianaNew              MexicoTexasConnecticutMaineNew York UtahDelawareMarylandNorth              CarolinaVermontDist.              of ColumbiaMassachusettsNorth              DakotaVirginiaFloridaMichiganOhioWashingtonGeorgiaMinnesotaOklahomaWest              VirginiaHawaiiMississippiOregonWisconsinIdahoMissouriPennsylvanniaWyoming
Facility Directory
VA              Home Page / Site              Map / Privacy & Security              StatementDisclaimer /               FOIA              / Contact            the VA
Reviewed/Updated:          October 27, 2004 |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Casé No. 9,713.

#### MONROE v. BRADLEY.

[1 Cranch, C. C. 158.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

Dec. Term, 1803.

Injunction — Violation — Contempt —Imprisonment.

' The court of chancery will imprison for contempt in violating an injunction.

1

 [Reported by Hon. William Craneh, Chief Judge.]

[This was a suit by Thomas Monroe, superintendent of the city, against William Bradley.] In this case, a similar attachment [as in the case against Samuel Harkhess] was issued in the first instance. Both the defendants were ordered into close custody for the term of six days, the present day to be considered as one, and to stand further committed until the costs upon the attachment should be paid.

[See Case No. 9,715.]
**Proposed General Fund USSGL: Effective for FY 2017**

**Account Title:** Other General Fund Financing Sources

**Account Number:** 579010

**Normal Balance:** Debit

**Definition:** This account is used to record amounts that are authorized by law to be financed by the General Fund of the U.S. Government. This account is for the General Fund of the U.S. Government use only. Although the normal balance for this account is debit, it is acceptable in certain instances for this account to have a credit balance. 

**Justification:**Enables the General Fund of the U.S. Government to properly identify amounts which are authorized by law to be financed by the General Fund of the U.S. Government, but have not yet been provided for in other accounts.  Establishes an offset to agencies 579001G to enable proper IGT eliminations.

**Attribute Table:**

**Financial Statements:**

**RC Table:** 37

**Account Title:** Other Non-Budgetary Financing Sources for Debt Accruals/Amortization

**Account Number:** 579001

**Normal Balance:** Credit

**Definition**: This accounts if for Treasury's Bureau of the Fiscal Service use, to record accruals and amortization related to debt that have not yet been outlaid. Although the normal balance for this account is credit, it is acceptable in certain instances for this account to have a debit balance. 

**Justification:** To distinguish debt amortization and accrual activity from other activity yet to be financed by the General Fund of the U.S. Government, so that it can be properly identified and eliminated through the IGT process.

**Attribute Table:**

**Financial Statements:**

**RC Table:** 37

**Validation Impact: Yes/No?**

Yes: USSGL account will be limited to TAFS 20X0550 and 20_1875

**Proposed General Fund USSGLs: Effective for FY 2016**

Bulletin No. 2016-05	                                                           pg.1 			IRC Handout 4/21/16

**For FY 2017**

**Account Title:** Liability for Fund Balance While Awaiting a Warrant

**Account Number:** 209010

**Normal Balance:** Credit

**Definition:** The General Fund of the U.S. Government’s liability for Fund Balance with Treasury while awaiting a warrant. This account corresponds to the Federal reporting entity's Fund Balance with Treasury While Awaiting a Warrant (USSGL account 109000). The balance in this account will adjust to zero when the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Bureau of Fiscal Service issues a warrant and must adjust to zero by yearend. This account is for the General Fund of the U.S. Governement use only. This account does not close at yearend.

**Justification:**Establishes an offset to agencies 109000 in order to enable proper IGT eliminations under a continuing resolution.

**Attribute Table:**

**Financial Statements:**

**RC Table:**40

**Validation: Yes/No?**

Yes validation 37