alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
                                                                                               EXHIBIT 12
                                  INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY
                  Computation of Consolidated Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                                 (in thousands except ratio data)
<CAPTION>
                                                                     Year Ended December 31,             
                                                       1993       1994       1995       1996       1997  
<S>                                                  <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>     
Fixed Charges:                                                                                           
  Interest on First Mortgage Bonds. . . . . . . .    $ 53,771   $ 43,564   $ 43,410   $ 41,209   $ 39,678
  Interest on Other Long-term Debt. . . . . . . .      23,504     24,725     23,564     20,100     21,064
  Interest on Short-term Debt . . . . . . . . . .       1,085      1,883      2,003      2,982      3,248
  Miscellaneous Interest Charges. . . . . . . . .       3,039      3,520      3,472      3,262      3,187
  Estimated Interest Element in Lease Rentals . .      84,300     85,000     82,700     82,600     79,700
       Total Fixed Charges. . . . . . . . . . . .    $165,699   $158,692   $155,149   $150,153   $146,877

Earnings:
  Net Income. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .    $129,344   $157,502   $141,092   $157,153   $146,740
  Plus Federal Income Taxes . . . . . . . . . . .      38,826     32,303     55,990     76,899     74,223
  Plus State Income Taxes . . . . . . . . . . . .       7,492      6,063      7,058      9,270      7,519
  Plus Fixed Charges (as above) . . . . . . . . .     165,699    158,692    155,149    150,153    146,877
       Total Earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . .    $341,361   $354,560   $359,289   $393,475   $375,359
                                                                                                         
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges. . . . . . . .        2.06       2.23       2.31       2.62       2.55
</TABLE>
No. 61761.

#### Union Brokerage Co. *v.*United States,

protests 294183-K, etc. (Pembina).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of yellow cedar the same in all material respects as that the subject of *Border Brokerage Co. et al.*v. *United States*(39 Cust. Ct. 179, C. D. 1923), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
November 10, 2015

Dear Mr. Stuart:

This letter is to inform you th at the following information is missing from your petition (Docket

No. FAA

− 2015

− 3549). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture a nd Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) which is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to proceed without this manual and remove clos ed-set filming from your proposed operation please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below.

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov. Once your information has b een submitted, please also send a copy of the requested information (and any proprietary in formation), as well as your comment tracking number from regulations.gov via e-mail to 333exe mptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the in formation described above by 11/24/15. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,
/S/
Brenda Robeson Program Analyst
Before the First Division,

March 23, 1960

No. 63989.

protests 316570-K/9044, etc. (Chicago).

#### J. E. Bernard & Company, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Mollison, Judge:

The protests enumerated in the attached schedule of protests involve shipments of certain cane sticks cut from the giant reed, Arundo donax, on which duty was assessed at the rate of 10 per centum ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 405 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by T.D. 51802, for “Wood, unmanufactured, not specially provided for.” The protest claim in each case is for free entry under the provision in paragraph 1806 of the Tariff Act of 1930 for “Sticks * * * in the rough.”

When the protests were called for trial, they were, upon motion of counsel for the plaintiffs, consolidated for trial and disposition together. Counsel for the parties agreed that the merchandise here involved is similar in all material respects to that which was the subject of decision in the case of J. *E. Bernard & Company, Inc.*v. *United States,*41 Cust. Ct. 1, C.D. 2011, and, also by agreement of counsel, the record in the case of *Rico Products Co. et al.*v. *United States,*protests 58/7987, etc., was incorporated as part of the record herein. The *Rico Products Co. et al.*case involves merchandise such as that at bar, and the record in the *Bernard*case was, by agreement of counsel, incorporated as part of the record therein.

For the reasons stated in our opinion in *Rico Products Co. et al.*v. *United States,*protests 58/7978, etc., 44 Cust. Ct. 100, C.D. 2159, decided concurrently herewith, the claim made in each of the protests here involved for free entry under paragraph 1806 is sustained, and judgment will issue accordingly.
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1423 

To require the Secretary of Transportation to modify the final rule relating 

to flightcrew member duty and rest requirements for passenger operations of air carriers to apply to all-cargo operations of air carriers, 

and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 22, 2017 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR (for herself, Ms. CANTWELL, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Mr. MARKEY, Mr. FRANKEN, and Ms. DUCKWORTH) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 

Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Transportation to modify the 

final rule relating to flightcrew member duty and rest 

requirements for passenger operations of air carriers to 

apply to all-cargo operations of air carriers, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Safe Skies Act of 

5 2017’’. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1423 IS

1 SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF FINAL RULE RELATING TO 

2 FLIGHTCREW MEMBER DUTY AND REST RE3 QUIREMENTS FOR PASSENGER OPERATIONS 

4 TO APPLY TO ALL-CARGO OPERATIONS. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—Not later than 30 days after the 

6 date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Trans7 portation shall modify the final rule specified in subsection 

8 (b) so that the flightcrew member duty and rest require9 ments under that rule apply to flightcrew members in all10 cargo operations conducted by air carriers in the same 

11 manner as those requirements apply to flightcrew mem12 bers in passenger operations conducted by air carriers. 

13 (b) FINAL RULE SPECIFIED.—The final rule speci14 fied in this subsection is the final rule of the Federal Avia15 tion Administration— 

16 (1) published in the Federal Register on Janu17 ary 4, 2012 (77 Fed. Reg. 330); and 

18 (2) relating to flightcrew member duty and rest 

19 requirements. 

20 (c) APPLICABILITY OF RULEMAKING REQUIRE21 MENTS.—The requirements of section 553 of title 5, 

22 United States Code, shall not apply to the modification 

23 required by subsection (a). 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
No. 57641.

#### Barnett International Forwarders, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 210862-K (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

The protest was dismissed.
# C_2018005EN.01003601.xml

| 8.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 5/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 5/36

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 November 2017 — De Meyer and Others v Commission

(Case T-667/16 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Civil service - Officials - Promotion - 2014 promotion exercise - List of officials proposed for promotion by the Directors-General and heads of service - Omission of the appellants’ names - Obligation to state reasons - No error of law - No distortion of the evidence - Application for the recusal of a judge))

(2018/C 005/48)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellants: Pieter De Meyer (Brussels, Belgium) and the other appellants whose names appear in the annex to the judgment (represented by R. Rata, lawyer)

Appellants:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented initially by G. Berscheid, C. Berardis-Kayser and A.-A. Gilly, and subsequently by G. Berscheid, G. Gattinara and C. Berardis-Kayser, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

APPEAL brought against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Single Judge) of 20 July 2016, Adriaen and Others v Commission (F-113/15, EU:F:2016:162), and seeking to have that judgment set aside.

Adriaen and Others

Commission

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal.

| 2. | Orders Mr Pieter De Meyer and the other officials whose names appear in the annex to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission in the present appeal proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Pieter De Meyer and the other officials whose names appear in the annex to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission in the present appeal proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 441, 28.11.2016.

1

---
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-14-0000934

04-DEC-2014

08:32 AM
No. 50913.

#### Protest 102872-K of C. H. Pearson & Son Hardwood Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the flitches are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Dixie Veneer Co., Inc.*(32 C. C. P. A. 75, C. A. D. 288), the claim for entry free of the tax or duties imposed under the provisions of section 3424 was sustained.
# C_2016383EN.01000701.xml

| 17.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 383/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 383/7

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam (Netherlands) lodged on 16 August 2016 — Openbaar Ministerie v Krzystof Marek Poltorak

(Case C-452/16)

(2016/C 383/09)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Rechtbank Amsterdam

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Openbaar Ministerie

Applicant:

Defendant: Krzystof Marek Poltorak

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Are the expressions ‘judicial authority’, within the meaning of Article 6(1) of Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA, (1) and ‘judicial decision’, within the meaning of Article 1(1) of Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA, autonomous terms of EU law? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Are the expressions ‘judicial authority’, within the meaning of Article 6(1) of Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA, (1) and ‘judicial decision’, within the meaning of Article 1(1) of Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA, autonomous terms of EU law?

1

| 2. | If the answer to Question 1 is in the affirmative: what are the criteria for determining whether an authority of the issuing Member State is such a ‘judicial authority’ and whether the EAW issued by it is consequently such a ‘judicial decision’? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If the answer to Question 1 is in the affirmative: what are the criteria for determining whether an authority of the issuing Member State is such a ‘judicial authority’ and whether the EAW issued by it is consequently such a ‘judicial decision’?

| 3. | If the answer to Question 1 is in the affirmative: is the Swedish National Police Board covered by the term ‘judicial authority’, within the meaning of Article 6(1) of Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA, and is the EAW issued by that authority consequently a ‘judicial decision’ within the meaning of Article 1(1) of Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA? |
| --- | --- |

3.

If the answer to Question 1 is in the affirmative: is the Swedish National Police Board covered by the term ‘judicial authority’, within the meaning of Article 6(1) of Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA, and is the EAW issued by that authority consequently a ‘judicial decision’ within the meaning of Article 1(1) of Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA?

| 4. | If the answer to Question 1 is in the negative: is the designation of a national police authority, such as the Swedish National Police Board, as the issuing judicial authority in conformity with EU law? |
| --- | --- |

4.

If the answer to Question 1 is in the negative: is the designation of a national police authority, such as the Swedish National Police Board, as the issuing judicial authority in conformity with EU law?

---

(1)  Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States (OJ 2002 L 190, p. 1).

1

---
No. 58929.

protest 234143-K (Los Angeles).

#### The Orient, Inc., and James G. Wiley *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that the subject of Abstract 57716, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
**EXHIBIT31.1**

 

**CertificationPursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Philip C. S. Yin,certify that:

 

1. Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of AXT, Inc.;

 

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors:

 

(a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 
| Dated: November 7, 2007 | By:    | /s/ Philip C. S. Yin      |
|-------------------------|--------|---------------------------|
|                    |   | Philip C. S. Yin          |
|                    |   | Chairman of the Board and |
|                    |   | Chief Executive Officer   |

 

 

----
Case 2:02-cv-04347-BWK Document 31 Filed 09/13/2004 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:02-cv-04347-BWK Document 31 Filed 09/13/2004 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:02-cv-04347-BWK Document 31 Filed 09/13/2004 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:02-cv-04347-BWK Document 31 Filed 09/13/2004 Page 4 of 4
1 

### Ogulei, David

From: Morgan, Andrea Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2014 9:42 AM To: kathyandria@gmail.com; klogansmith@moenviron.org; e jhubertz@wulaw.wustl.edu; amyfunk@illinois.edu; kmiller@wulaw.wustl.edu; davi d.klarich@veoliaes.com; Dennis.warchol@VeoliaES.com; Doug.harris@veoliaes.c om Cc: Ogulei, David; Damico, Genevieve; Woolums, Jane Subject: Air Permitting Actions Webpage for Veolia ES Techni cal Solutions



### Everyone,

Based off of the feedback that EPA received on the development of a public participation plan for Veol ia ES Technical Solutions LLC., EPA created a webpage for the upcom ing permitting action. Currently, the renewal appl ication and the comprehensive performance tests reports are availab le for download from the webpage. This website will be updated when EPA makes its decision available for public comment. The link to the page is below. Feel free to share th is link with other parties you think may be interested.



### http://www.epa.gov/region5/air/veoliasauget/index.h tml

Thanks, Andrea Morgan

Andrea Morgan Environmental Engineer U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 5 | Air & Radiation Division Phone: (312) 353-6058 | Fax: (312) 692-2920
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS48311 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
# C_2019148EN.01004401.xml

| 29.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/44

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 March 2019 — Espírito Santo Financial Group v ECB

(Case T-730/16) (1)

(Access to documents - Decision 2004/258/EC - Documents relating to the ECB’s decision of 1 August 2014 concerning Banco Espírito Santo SA - Partial refusal to grant access - Exception relating to the confidentiality of the proceedings of the ECB’s decision-making bodies - Exception relating to the financial, monetary or economic policy of the European Union or of a Member State - Exception relating to the stability of the financial system in the European Union or in a Member State - Exception relating to the protection of commercial interests - Exception relating to documents intended for internal use - Obligation to state reasons)

(2019/C 148/40)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Espírito Santo Financial Group SA (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: R. Oliveira, S. Estima Martins and D. Duarte de Campos, lawyers)

Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: F. von Lindeiner and S. Lambrinoc, acting as Agents, and by H.-G. Kamann, lawyer)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU for annulment of the ECB’s decision of 31 August 2016 refusing in part to disclose certain documents relating to its decision of 1 August 2014 concerning Banco Espírito Santo SA.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the European Central Bank (ECB) of 31 August 2016 partially refusing to disclose certain documents relating to its decision of 1 August 2014 concerning Banco Espírito Santo SA, in so far as it refused to disclose the amount of credit indicated in the extracts of the minutes recording the decision of the Governing Council of the ECB of 28 July 2014 and the information redacted from the proposals of the Executive Board of the ECB of 28 July and 1 August 2014; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the European Central Bank (ECB) of 31 August 2016 partially refusing to disclose certain documents relating to its decision of 1 August 2014 concerning Banco Espírito Santo SA, in so far as it refused to disclose the amount of credit indicated in the extracts of the minutes recording the decision of the Governing Council of the ECB of 28 July 2014 and the information redacted from the proposals of the Executive Board of the ECB of 28 July and 1 August 2014;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders Espírito Santo Financial Group SA and the ECB to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Espírito Santo Financial Group SA and the ECB to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 462, 12.12.2016.

---
No. 64069.

protest 59/18782 (New York).

#### Ford Motor Company *v.*United States,

*420Opinion by

Rao, J.

Since the protest was filed more than 60 days after liquidation, it was dismissed as untimely, by virtue of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.
CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2014-0598

DCN: SGE01046.A26

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT 

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION 

(CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B.
EXHIBIT 32.2



STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



The undersigned, Terry Prichard, is the Chief Financial Officer of Pocahontas
Bancorp, Inc. (the Company).



This statement is
being furnished in connection with the filing by the Company of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 (the Report).



By execution of this statement, I certify that:



| | A) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | B) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods covered by the Report.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This statement is
authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18
U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



|             |  |  |  |                      
|------------ |  |  |  | ---------------------
|             |  |  |  |                      
|             |  | 
|May 14, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/    TERRY PRICHARD
|             |  |  |  |                      
|Dated        |  |  |  | Terry Prichard       



32