alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-13-00135-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF B.J.A., et al., Children

From the 25th Judicial District Court, Guadalupe County, Texas

Trial Court No. 10-2398-CV

Honorable Karin Bonicoro, Judge Presiding

Opinion by: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: October 9, 2013

AFFIRMED

This is an appeal from the trial court’s order terminating appellant’s parental rights to two 

of her children. Appellant’s court-appointed appellate attorney filed a brief containing a 

professional evaluation of the record and demonstrating that there are no arguable grounds to be 

advanced. Counsel concludes that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the 

requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). See In re R.R., No. 04-03-00096-CV, 

2003 WL 21157944, at * 4 (Tex. App.—San Antonio May 21, 2003, no pet.) (applying Anders

procedure in appeal from termination of parental rights) (mem. op.); see also In re K.M., 98 S.W.3d 

774, 775 (Tex. App.—Fort Worth 2003, order) (same).

Counsel certified that a copy of his brief was delivered to appellant who was advised of 

her right to examine the record and to file a pro se brief. No pro se brief has been filed. After 
04-13-00135-CV

reviewing the record, we agree that the appeal is frivolous and without merit. The order of the 

trial court is affirmed, and counsel’s motion to withdraw is granted. 

Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

- 2 -
EXHIBIT 10.11.2
 
        (a)
    
    General Statement; Date Of Grant; Option Period;
Date Of Exercise. As of July 1, 2002, and
continuing while the Plan remains in effect, the
Company shall offer options under the Plan to all
Eligible Employees to purchase shares of Stock.
Except as otherwise determined by the Committee,
these options shall be granted on July 1, 2002, and
each six month anniversary of such date (each of
which dates is herein referred to as a Date of
Grant). The term of each option shall begin on a
Date of Grant and shall be for a period ending on the
next subsequent June 30 or December 31 (each such 6
month period shall be referred to as an Option
Period). The first day of the first Option Period
shall be a Date of Grant and the last day of such
Option Period shall be a Date of Exercise.
  (d)
    
    Eligible Compensation Defined. The term Eligible
Compensation means the gross (before taxes are
withheld) total of all compensation reportable in box
1 of Internal Revenue Service Form W-2 but, excluding




---



##### 



bonuses, tips, commissions, severance pay, dependent
care benefits, company car expenses, employee
business expenses, moving expenses, nonqualified plan
distributions, noncash fringe benefits, third-party
disability payments and group life insurance
benefits.
  14.
    
    Term of the Plan. The Plan shall be effective as of
July 1, 2002; provided that the Plan is approved by
the stockholders of the Company within 12 months of
the date of adoption by the Board. Notwithstanding
any provision in the Plan, no option granted under
the Plan shall be exercisable prior to such
stockholder approval, and, if the stockholders of the
Company do not approve the Plan within 12 months
after its adoption by the Board, then the Plan shall
automatically terminate.
  ODYSSEY HEALTHCARE, INC.By:
    /s/ RICHARD R. BURNHAMRichard R. Burnham, Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31.1
**CERTIFICATIONS**
**Certification of Chief Executive Officer**
I, Thomas W. Rabaut, certify that:
1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of United Defense Industries, Inc.;
2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;
3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.   The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:
a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b)   designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control overfinancial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regardingthe reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; and
c)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d)   disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
5.   The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):
a)   all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrols over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: April 28, 2005 /s/ Thomas W. Rabaut   Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
# Sheet1

Part 1SUPPLEMENT	DRAFT	Fiscal Year 2016 ReportingSection IV

IV AT - &P	DRAFT IRC Handout 4-21-16
**EXHIBIT      32.2 **

**CERTIFICATE      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | 1. | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),                as                applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company                at the dates and for the period                indicated. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                |                                   |                                                                                                |
|-------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                           |                              |                                                                                           |
| Dated:                April 6, 2006 | By:                          | /s/ Steven                R. Blake           |
|                                | Steven R. Blake                        |
|                                | Chief                Financial Officer |

----
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Certification of Nevada ClassicThoroughbreds, Inc.pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002regarding Annual Report on Form 10-Kfor the year ended June 30, 2016**

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), theundersigned officer of Nevada Classic Thoroughbreds, Inc., a Nevada corporation(the "Company"), does hereby certify that, based upon his knowledge:

1. The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30,2016 (the "Form 10-K") fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. Information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

> 
Dated: October 10, 2016

By: /s/ Brad Brimhall 

 

________________________________________

 

Brad Brimhall   Principal Financial Officer  Chief Accounting Officer/Acting Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Merrill Lynch
Preferred Capital Trust IV and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding IV, L.P.
(the "Partnership") for the period ended September 29, 2006 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Kathleen Skero, Controller of Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., the General
Partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Partnership.




                              MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING IV, L.P.

                              By:  MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC., as General Partner


                              By:  /s/ KATHLEEN SKERO
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                              Name:    Kathleen Skero *
                              Title:   Controller, Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.








Dated: November 8, 2006
______________________

*  Kathleen Skero functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
   and Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership for purposes of Section 906
   of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Order entered May 7, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00036-CV

SEIKILOS HOLDINGS, LLC, SEIKILOS FX STUDIOS, LLC, 

JOHN C. GOLFIS AND JULIE NGUYEN, Appellants

V.

EDWARD “LANNY” HOULLION, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS GENERAL PARTNER 

OF HOULLION FAMILY, LP, AND HOULLION FAMILY, LP, Appellees

On Appeal from the 134th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-13053

ORDER

We GRANT appellants’ May 4, 2015 motion for an extension of time to provide this 

Court with the name, State Bar number, address, and telephone number of new counsel. 

Appellants shall provide the above-required information by JUNE 5, 2015. Failure to provide 

the information by JUNE 5, 2015, will result in the dismissal of appellants Seikilos Holdings, 

LLC and Seikilos FX Studios, LLC as parties to this appeal. See TEX. R. CIV. P. 7; Kunstoplast 

of Am., Inc. v. Formosa Plastics Corp., 937 S.W.2d 455, 456 (Tex. 1996) (per curiam).

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 31.2
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Belk, Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;
 4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused
such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our
supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;c.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
  /s/ Brian T. Marley
### D ISTRICT 

### C OURT 

### O F 

### A PPEAL 

### O F 

### T HE 

### S TATE 

### O F 

### F LORIDA

F OURTH D ISTRICT

BRIAN CLANCY
, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

.

No. 4D 17

- 1165

[ July 26, 2018 ]

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County ; Samantha Schosberg Feuer , Judge; L.T. Case No.

502015CF012795A

.

Carey Haughwout, Public Defender, and Ian Seldin, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.

P ER C URIAM

.

Affirmed.

G ROSS

, T AYLOR and F ORST

, JJ., concur

.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
We will keep fighting for all libraries - stand with us!

Donate iconAn illustration of a heart shape"Donate to the archive"Upload iconAn illustration of a horizontal line over an up pointing arrow.Upload
Sign up
Log in

web pages

#### Mobile Apps

                      Wayback Machine (iOS)
                      Wayback Machine (Android)
                      Chrome
                      Firefox
                      Safari
                      Edge
                      Explore the Collections
                      Learn More
                      Build Collections
                      About
                      Blog
                      Projects
                      Help
                      Donate
                      Contact
                      Jobs
                      Volunteer
                      People
                      Sign up for free        Log in        metadata        text contents        TV news captions        radio transcripts        archived web sites        AboutBlogProjectsHelpDonateDonate iconAn illustration of a heart shapeContactJobsVolunteerPeople
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1077 

To direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to amend the mission 

statement of the Food and Drug Administration. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 9, 2017 

Mr. MANCHIN introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to 

amend the mission statement of the Food and Drug 

Administration. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Changing the Culture 

5 of the FDA Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. MISSION STATEMENT OF THE FOOD AND DRUG AD7 MINISTRATION. 

8 The Secretary of Health and Human Services, acting 

9 through the Commissioner of Food and Drugs, is directed 

10 to amend the mission statement of the Food and Drug 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1077 IS

1 Administration to include the following statement: ‘‘The 

2 FDA is also responsible for protecting the public health 

3 by strongly considering the danger of addiction and over4 dose death associated with prescription opioid medications 

5 when approving these medications and when regulating 

6 the manufacturing, marketing, and distribution of opioid 

7 medications.’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
----

Action brought on 4 May 2006 — Sonia Rykiel Création et Diffusion de Modèles v OHIM — Cuadrado (SONIA SONIA RYKIEL)

(Case T-131/06)

(2006/C 165/55)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Sonia Rykiel Création et Diffusion de Modèles (Paris, France) (represented by: E. Baud, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Cuadrado S.A. (Paterna, Spain)

Form of order sought

Pleas in law and main arguments

Applicant for the Community trade mark: Sonia Rykiel Création et Diffusion de Modèles.

Community trade mark concerned: The figurative mark ‘SONIA SONIA RYKIEL’ for goods in classes 3, 9, 14, 18 and 25 (Community trade mark application No 1035625)

Proprietor of the mark or sign cited in the opposition proceedings: Cuadrado, S.A.

Mark or sign cited: The national trade marks ‘SONIA’ for goods in classes 24 and 25.

Decision of the Opposition Division: Rejection of the opposition with respect to the goods covered in class 25.

Decision of the Board of Appeal: Annulment of the decision of the Opposition Division and rejection of the mark applied for, for all goods covered by it in class 25.

Pleas in law: Infringement of Article 43(3) of Regulation No 40/94 and of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 40/94.

----
#### Spier *et al.,*commissioners, *vs.*Morgan.

The act of December IS, 1871, the title of which is “An act to create a hoard of commissioners of roads and revenues in the counties of Floyd, Berrien, Effingham, Schley, Sumter and Greene,” is not.in conflict with art. S, sec. 4, par. 5 of the constitution of 1868. There is but one subject-matter referred to in the act, and that is the creation of a hoard of commissioners for the counties named; and that subject-matter and no other is clearly expressed in the title of the act.

April 4, 1888.

Local legislation. Constitutional law. Before Judge Atkinson. Effingham superior court. May term, 1887.

Spier *et*al., commissioners of roads and revenues of Effingham county, recovered a judgment against Morgan, and he moved to set it aside because there were no commissioners of roads and revenues for said county the act *582organizing said board being unconstitutional, null and void. This motion was sustained, and the commissioners excepted.

J. G. & D. II. Clark, for plaintiffs in error.

Denmark *&*Adams, *contra.*

Blandford, Justice.

The only question in this case is, whether the act of December 13, 1871, (acts 1871-2, 222,) is violative of the constitution of 1868, article 3, section 4, paragraph 5, which provides that no law or ordinance shall pass which refers to more than one subject-matter, or contains matter different from what is expressed in the title thereof. The court below held that it was unconstitutional and void, because, he says, it contains more than one subject-matter. The title to this act is, “ An act to create a board of commissioners of roads and revenues in the counties of Floyd, Berrien, Effingham, Schley, Sumter and Greene.”

This is a case to be decided more by instinct than by logic or ratiocination. Suppose the title to this act had been “ An act to create a board of commissioners of roads and revenues in the several counties of this State,” and the body of the act so provided, would it be contended seriously that it referred to more than one subject-matter because it extended to all the counties of the State ? How, then, can it be said to refer to more than one subject-matter because it creates a board of commissioners of roads and revenues for certain counties in the State, less than all the counties of the State? We think it is clear that the act refers to but one subject-matter, and that subject-matteris the creation of a board of commissioners for the counties named. And it does not make any difference how few or how many counties of the State are embraced in ah act of this character; it has but one purpose and object. We think, therefore, that the decision of the court below should be reversed.
EXHIBIT 13.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
 SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
 SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of IRSA Propiedades Comerciales S.A. (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Alejandro G. Elsztain, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





IRSA Propiedades Comerciales S.A.October 23, 2015.
By:
/s/ Alejandro G. ElsztainAlejandro G. ElsztainChief Executive Officer


This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except as to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended