alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 211 (Thursday, November 2, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 75281]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-24204]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[CERCLA-04-2024-7001, FRL-11528-01-R4]


U.S. Finishing, LLC and Cone Mills Corporation Superfund Site, 
Greenville, South Carolina; Proposed Settlements

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of proposed settlement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation 
and Liability Act (CERCLA), the United States Environmental Protection 
Agency is proposing to enter into an Administrative Settlement 
Agreement for Remedial Design/Remedial Action by Prospective Purchaser 
with Cone Mills Acquisition Group, LLC, concerning the U.S. Finishing, 
LLC and Cone Mills Corporation Superfund Site. The settlement agreement 
addresses a Remedial Design/Remedial Action to be performed at the site 
by Cone Mills Acquisition Group, LLC, a Prospective Purchaser.

DATES: The Agency will consider public comments on the proposed 
settlement until December 4, 2023. The Agency will consider all 
comments received and may modify or withdraw its consent to the 
proposed settlements if comments received disclose facts or 
considerations which indicate that the proposed settlement is 
inappropriate, improper, or inadequate.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the proposed settlements are available from the 
Agency by contacting Ms. Paula V. Painter, Program Analyst, using the 
contact information provided in this notice. Comments may also be 
submitted by referencing the Site's name through one of the following 
methods:
    Internet: https://www.epa.gov/aboutepa/about-epa-region-4-southeast#r4-public-notices.
    Email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#92c2f3fbfce6f7e0bcc2f3e7fef3d2f7e2f3bcf5fde4"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="97c7f6fef9e3f2e5b9c7f6e2fbf6d7f2e7f6b9f0f8e1">[email protected]</span></a>.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paula V. Painter at 404/562-8887.

Maurice Horsey,
Branch Manager, Enforcement Branch, Superfund & Emergency Management 
Division.
[FR Doc. 2023-24204 Filed 11-1-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2017161EN.01002601.xml

| 22.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 161/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 161/26

---

Judgment of the General Court of 6 April 2017 — Azanta v EUIPO — Novartis (NIMORAL)

(Case T-49/16) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark NIMORAL - Earlier EU word mark NEORAL - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2017/C 161/36)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Azanta A/S (Hellerup, Denmark) (represented by: M. Hoffgaard Rasmussen, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas, Agent)

Defendant:

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Novartis AG (Basel, Switzerland)

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 1 December 2015 (Case R 634/2015-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Novartis and Azanta.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Azanta A/S to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Azanta A/S to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 106, 21.3.2016.

1

---
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 98-40391

Summary Calendar

 

SERGIO HIRAM ALVIDREZ,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

KENNETH W. WILLIAMS, Assistant

Warden; CHARLES BELL; ERNEST H. GUTERREZ,

JR.; STEVE SANGSTER; EMIL C. GARZA; 

BRUCE V. PETERSON; MICHAEL BAILEY,

Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. G-96-CV-577

- - - - - - - - - -

October 8, 1998

Before KING, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Sergio Hiram Alvidrez, Texas prisoner no. 512255, appeals

the district court’s order dismissing, as frivolous, his 42

U.S.C. § 1983 claims. After reviewing the record and Alvidrez’s

arguments on appeal, we AFFIRM for the reasons given by the

district court. See Alvidrez v. Williams, G-96-CV-577, (S.D.

Tex., April 7, 1998).
Before the 

 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY 

 WASHINGTON, DC 

INTRA-ALASKA MAINLINE 

SERVICE MAIL RATES 

Docket OST-2003-14695 

UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE COMMENTS ON 

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE ESTABLISHING NEW MAINLINE SERVICE MAIL RATES 

 

Communications with respect to this 

document should be addressed to: 

 Joseph Anzalone, Esq. 

 Office of General Counsel 

 United States Postal Service 

 475 L’Enfant Plaza SW 

 Washington, DC 20260-1127 

 joseph.anzalone@usps.gov 

Date Filed: September 30, 2011 

1
2

The Postal Service presents brief comments in response to Show Cause Order 2011-9-6 (“the 

Order”). As to the substance of the rates proposed in the Order, the Postal Service has no 

general objection to the Department’s calculations or methodology. However, the Postal 

Service wishes to raise a concern arising from Lynden Air Cargo’s (LAC) cost data. 

On the third page of the Order, under the heading “Nonfuel Line Haul Results,” the 

Department reports that: 

“The increase in costs for LAC seems to be driven by the significant 

decrease in airborne hours it operated. Those hours decreased by 41 

percent, from 11,590 to 6,893 per the carrier’s Form 41, Schedule P5.1, 

while corresponding direct expenses, which are often driven by airborne 

hours, did not decrease as significantly. The resulting increase in unit 

costs reflects management’s decision not to trim back personnel and other 

expenses commensurately with the decrease in hours.” 

LAC had a dramatic decrease in operating hours. However, LAC’s direct expenses – which 

are driven by operating hours – did not have a significant decrease. This leads the Postal 

Service to believe that adopting the proposed rates may in effect put the Postal Service in a 

position to supplement LAC’s workforce in other areas. The Postal Service questions LAC’s 

decision not to trim back personal and other expenses. 

The Postal Service objects to the proposed new mainline service mail rates to the extent that 

LAC’s cost data have produced an inflated value for the new proposed rates. The 

Department’s proposal should not place the Postal Service in a position to supplement a 

carrier’s non-mail related operations.
Wyoming Nitrate Contribution to Theodore Roosevelt Worst

site Year modelrun param N SReg PT AF MV Nat Area Total THRO1 2002 plan02c36k PN3 19 WY 0.0351368 0.0001158 0.0240211 0.0018 0.0082368 0.0693105 Wyoming's 2002 Contribution (20% Worst) to Nitrate at Theodore Roosevelt = 0.07 divided by 1.7, or 4% Best

site Year modelrun param N SReg PT AF MV Nat Area Total THRO1 2002 plan02c36k PN3 18 WY 0.0500611 0.0001056 0.03255 0.0045611 0.01345 0.1007278 Wyoming's 2002 Contribution (20% Best) to Nitrate at Theodore Roosevelt = 0.1 divided by 1.4, or 7%
1

 Parties include all persons, corporations or other business entities, and insurance companies with

an interest in the case, and each entity with an interest in the case must attend the conference. In the case of

corporate or other business entities, the corporate official with ultimate settlement authority is required to attend. 

Where an insurance company is involved, a representative with ultimate settlement authority is also required to

attend. 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

SunGard Financial Systems Inc. : CIVIL ACTION

:

:

v. :

:

J.B. Oxford & Co. : NO. 02-4332

:

:

CONFERENCE ORDER

A Settlement Conference in the above-captioned case will be held on Tuesday,

October 21, 2003 at 10:30 a.m. before the Honorable James R. Melinson, Chief United States

Magistrate Judge, in Room 3000, U.S. Courthouse, 601 Market Street, Philadelphia, Pa. 19106.

The court assumes that settlement of this case is a real possibility. Counsel are

directed to notify the court if this assumption is unwarranted.

Counsel are directed to arrange to have clients with ultimate authority to

settle physically PRESENT in the courtroom for the duration of this conference.

1

 Parties

are to remain present until expressly released by the court.

Counsel are further directed to complete the enclosed Settlement Conference

Summary to be delivered to Chambers on or before Tuesday, October 14, 2003.

 

Hon. James R. Melinson

Chief United States Magistrate Judge

Nancy DeLisle, Deputy Clerk 

215-597-5316

Date: October 10, 2003

cc: Rebecca D. Ward, Esq. James T. Smith, Esq. Mark St. Stewart, Esq.

 Michael E. Adler, Esq. C. Philip Campbell, Jr., Esq. Tammy Giroux, Esq.

Case 2:02-cv-04332-RK Document 21 Filed 10/14/2003 Page 1 of 2
SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE SUMMARY

CAPTION: 

DISTRICT COURT JUDGE: JURY / NONJURY

 (Circle One)

 TRIAL/POOL DATE: 

COUNSEL ATTENDING SETTLEM ENT CONFERENCE: 

Name: 

Address: 

Phone: 

 

Client: 

CLIENT ATTENDING SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE:

 

 Name of Individual with Ultimate Settlement Authority who will be present at the settlement 

conference (include company and position where applicable):

 

MOTIONS PENDING:

 

 

 

OTHER RELEVANT M ATTERS: 

 

 

 

PRIOR OFFERS / DEMANDS: 

 

 

ATTACH SYNOPSIS OF CASE (LIMITED TO ONE PAGE)

Case 2:02-cv-04332-RK Document 21 Filed 10/14/2003 Page 2 of 2
AFS-15-031-E 

February 4, 2015 

Mr. Steve Rhode 

8301 Wycombe Ridge Way 

Wake Forest, NC 27587 

Dear Mr. Rhode: 

This is in response to your October 6, 2014, letter sent to the docket (No. FAA-2014-0799) 

petitioning the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) for an exemption from part 21, 

Subpart H; §§ 45.23(b); 45.27(a); 61.113(a) and (b); 61.133(a); 91.7(a); 91.9(b)(2); 91.103; 

91.109(a); 91.119; 91.121; 91.151(a); 91.203(a) and (b); 91.319(a)(1); 91.405(a); 

91.407(a)(1); 91.409(a)(2); 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations 

(14 CFR). That exemption, if granted, would allow you to perform public safety operations 

with fire departments, ambulance services, emergency medical service operations, and search 

and rescue agencies in order to provide real-time operational assistance in emergency 

operations. 

By email dated January 14, 2015, which posted to the docket January 16, the FAA sent you a 

request for additional information asking you to provide the following information: 

 Describe the aircraft make and model for the proposed UAS operation. The 

description should include the following: size and whether the aircraft is fixed wing 

or rotorcraft. 

 List the aircraft’s cruise speed. 

 Provide information regarding the radio frequency spectrum. 

 Describe the process used to document UAS discrepancies and the corrective action 

taken in the aircraft record. 
2

 Your petition referenced a pilot operating manual (POM) and a pilot operating 

handbook (POH), however those documents were not submitted for the record. 

Because your petition lacks sufficient information to proceed, the FAA has closed your 

exemption request. Should you wish to provide the additional information please resubmit 

your petition for exemption to the public docket. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Lirio Liu 

Director 

Office of Rulemaking
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 187 Filed 01/08/2004 Page 1 of 13
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 187 Filed 01/08/2004 Page 2 of 13
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 187 Filed 01/08/2004 Page 3 of 13
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 187 Filed 01/08/2004 Page 4 of 13
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 187 Filed 01/08/2004 Page 5 of 13
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 187 Filed 01/08/2004 Page 6 of 13
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 187 Filed 01/08/2004 Page 7 of 13
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 187 Filed 01/08/2004 Page 8 of 13
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 187 Filed 01/08/2004 Page 9 of 13
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 187 Filed 01/08/2004 Page 10 of 13
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 187 Filed 01/08/2004 Page 11 of 13
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 187 Filed 01/08/2004 Page 12 of 13
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 187 Filed 01/08/2004 Page 13 of 13
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MARA FLAMM : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. :

:

SARNER & ASSOCIATES, P.C., et al. : NO. 02-4302

ORDER

AND NOW, this 2nd day of January, 2003, after conducting a Discovery Hearing with counsel

in the above-captioned action, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Defendants objection to Plaintiff’s request for “[a]ll documents related to the collection

of debts such as Plaintiff’s” is sustained. Discovery is permitted for those matters referred by Dr.

Brown to Sarner & Associates.

2. Defendants’ objection to Plaintiff’s request for “[a]ll financial reports and statements to

investors of Defendant for the past three years” and “[a]ll income tax returns of the Defendant for

the past three years” is sustained. Discovery concerning punitive damages shall be made available

at the time of trial.

3. Defendants’ objection to Plaintiff’s request for “[c]opies of all cancelled checks or other

documents relating to the employment of any person, company or business in connection with the

collections of the debt owed by Plaintiff” is sustained, subject to interrogatories and deposition(s)

concerning the handling of Ms. Flamm’s debt.

4. The attorney-client privilege has been waived by Defendant Brown in regard to her

correspondence with the Sarner Defendants.

5. Defendant Brown shall submit to the Court for in camera inspection medical records that

refer to Plaintiff’s treatment from 1997-1998 no later than January 22, 2003.

6. A Telephone Status Conference in this matter will be held on February 4, 2003, at

10:00 a.m. to discuss the medical records reviewed by the Court, Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend the

Complaint, as well as an extension of the discovery deadline. Plaintiff’s counsel shall initiate this

conference call to (215) 597-6079.

BY THE COURT:

 

M. FAITH ANGELL

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 33 Filed 01/03/2003 Page 1 of 1
*****Exhibit 23.1*****

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3(No. 333-60819) of TECO Capital Trust II of our report dated March 21, 2005 relating to the financial statements, which appears in this Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated March 1, 2005 relating to thefinancial statements, financial statement schedules, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in the TECO Energy,Inc. Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. 

 

/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

 

Tampa, Florida 

March 30, 2005
# C_2017424EN.01003002.xml

| 11.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 424/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 424/30

---

Judgment of the General Court of 26 October 2017 — Hello Media Group v EUIPO — Hola (#hello digitalmente diferentes)

(Case T-330/16) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark #hello digitalmente diferentes - Earlier EU word and figurative marks HELLO! - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Replacement of a party to the proceedings))

(2017/C 424/43)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Hello Media Group, SL (Madrid, Spain), authorised to replace Hello Media, SL (represented by: A. Alejos Cutuli, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Hola, SL (Madrid) (represented by: F. Arroyo Álvarez de Toledo, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 April 2016 (Case R 1979/2015-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Hola and Hello Media.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Authorises Hello Media Group, SL, to replace Hello Media, SL, as applicant; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Authorises Hello Media Group, SL, to replace Hello Media, SL, as applicant;

| 2. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action;

| 3. | Orders Hello Media Group to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Hello Media Group to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 296, 16.8.2016.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906


OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Todays Alternative Energy Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended October 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Len Amato, President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)    Information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated: May 20, 2011
/s/ Len AmatoBy:
Len AmatoIts:
President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial and

Accounting)





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Todays Alternative Energy Corporation and will be retained by Todays Alternative Energy Corporation. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 67769.

#### U.S. Blanket Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 62/8730, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

Tbe protests were dismissed, except as to tbe merchandise covered by entries 988656, 978146, and 961286. *Champion Coated Paper Co.*v. *United States*(24 CCPA 83, T.D. 48411), followed.
Exhibit 31



CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Nancy M. Harvey, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TenFold Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) disclosed in this report any change in
the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control
over financial reporting; and



5. I have disclosed, based on my
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                                                               
|---------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                               
|/s/ Nancy M. Harvey                                            
|Nancy M. Harvey                                                
|President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer
|November 14, 2005
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1


     CERTIFICATION BY LYLE G. STOCKSTILL PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Torch Offshore, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission of the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Lyle G. Stockstill,
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


/s/ Lyle G. Stockstill
-------------------------------------------------
Lyle G. Stockstill
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Torch Offshore, Inc. and will be retained by Torch Offshore, Inc.
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.