alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Before the Third Division,

March 14, 1949

No. 52926.

#### Pilot Radio Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 62936-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on entries 823840 and 818960. In regard to the further claim in the protest, it was stipulated that the *260merchandise consists of record changer units similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Garrard Sales Corp.*v. *United States*(35 C. C. P. A. 39, C. A. D. 369). The claim as to said merchandise was therefore sustained.
IN THE UNITED STATES OF DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

 

 : MDL DOCKET NO. 1203 

IN RE DIET DRUGS : 

(PHENTERMINE/FENFLURAMINE/ : 

DEXFENFLURAMINE) PRODUCTS : 

LIABILITY LITIGATION : MDL NO. 02-20143 

 : 

 : 

CYNTHIA ACOSTA, ET AL. : 

 : 

v. : 

 : 

AMERICAN HOME PRODUCTS : 

CORPORATION, ET AL. : 

 : 

PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 

 AND NOW TO WIT: This ____ day of _______________, 2005, it having been 

reported that the issues between the parties have been settled with respect to plaintiff Elise 

Daniels in the above-captioned action, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1(b) of 

the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby 

 ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, all claims of plaintiff Elise Daniels in 

the above-captioned action are DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all named 

Defendants. 

MICHAEL E. KUNZ, Clerk of Court 

BY: ____________________________ 

Katherine Gallagher 

Deputy Clerk 

Case 2:02-cv-20143-HB Document 28 Filed 04/13/2005 Page 1 of 1
No. 66748.

#### Karl Schroff Assoc., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 58/10017-9858 (Chicago).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of glass mosaic panels similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Margaret Silberman*v. *United States*(44 Cust. Ct. 197, C.D. 2175), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Case 2:05-cv-00612-HB Document 311 Filed 02/27/12 Page 1 of 1
Top of page

Skip to main content

Library of Congress

              - Discover
              - Services
              - Visit
              - Education
              - Connect
              - Shop *external link*
              - Donate
              - About
              - Ask a Librarian
              - Help
              - Contact
              - Search Online Catalog
              - Copyright.gov
              - Congress.gov

Library of Congress
Digital Collections
Stars and Stripes: The American Soldiers' Newspaper of World War I, 1918 to 1919
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

v. CRIMINAL ACTION 

WILLIAM MARTINEZ 

NO. 05-cr-123-12 

0 ORDER 

AND NOW, this}J day of April 2016, upon consideration of the Defendant's prose 

Motion for a Reduction of Sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) and Amendment 782 to 

the Sentencing Guidelines, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is DENIED.1 

It is so ORDERED. 

The Clerk is DIRECTED to CLOSE this case. 

BY THE COURT: 

IA~. RUFE, J. ~ Q 1 Amendment 782 to the Federal Sentencing Guidelines reduces by two levels the base offense levels in the 

Drug Quantity Table in§ 2Dl.l. 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) provides that where a defendant has been sentenced to 

imprisonment based on a sentencing range that has been subsequently lowered by the Sentencing Commission, the 

sentencing court may reduce the sentence subject to applicable policy statements issued by the Commission. In 

determining a defendant's eligibility for a reduction, the Court follows the approach directed by the Supreme Court: 

First, the Court must determine what the applicable guidelines range would have been ifthe relevant amendment 

had been in effect when the defendant was originally sentenced. The Court may only substitute the amendment for 

the corresponding guidelines provisions that were applied when the defendant was sentenced, and must leave all 

other guideline applications decisions alone. If the Court determines that the defendant is ineligible for a reduction 

at step one, the Court does not proceed. Dillon v. United States, 560 U.S. 817, 821 (2010). 

Defendant was sentenced on June 28, 2006, following a plea of guilty to conspiracy to distribute more than 

one kilogram of heroin, in violation of21 U.S.C. § 846 and 21 U.S.C. § 84l(a)(l). Because Defendant had a prior 

felony drug conviction, Defendant was subject to a statutory mandatory minimum penalty of240 months of 

imprisonment. At sentencing, the Court granted a downward variance from the applicable guidelines range of262-

327 months of imprisonment and sentenced the Defendant to 240 months of imprisonment as required by the 

mandatory minimum. Although Amendment 782 lowers Defendant's adjusted offense level and guidelines range, 

the Court's downward variance resulted in a sentence that was set by the statutory mandatory minimum penalty. 

Section 501.1 of the Sentencing Guidelines provides that the Court may not impose a sentence that is less than any 

statutorily required mandatory minimum sentence. Amendment 782 does not affect § 501.1 or the sentence 

required by statute, and therefore Defendant is ineligible for a reduction in his sentence. 

Case 2:05-cr-00123-CMR Document 805 Filed 04/21/16 Page 1 of 1
##### 



Exhibit 10.40
 AGREEMENT AMENDING SUPPLEMENTAL
EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT AGREEMENT
  R E C I T A L S
 XXXXXXXX
   A G R E E M E N T S
  1. Purchase of the Policies.
 2. Ownership of the Policies.
   A - 1




---



##### 



3. Economic Benefit Limited to Current Life Insurance Protection Amount.
 $XXX,XXX
    4. Beneficiary Designation Rights.
 5. Premium Payments.




---



##### 



6. Income Taxation of Current Life Insurance Protection Amount.
 7. Death of the Executive.
    8 Exchange of Policies.
 9. No Assignment Rights of Executive.
 10. Insurance Company Not a Party to This Agreement.




---



##### 



.
 MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC., a 
Delaware CorporationBy:James J. Giancola, President and CEO
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FEBRUARY 6, 2014

NO. 03-11-00662-CV

The City of Austin d/b/a Austin Energy; and Larry Weis, General Manager, 

Austin Energy, Appellants

v.

MET Center NYCTEX, Phase II, Ltd., Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 98TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, HENSON, AND GOODWIN

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN;

JUSTICE HENSON NOT PARTICIPATING

This is an appeal from the interlocutory order signed by the trial court on October 11, 2011. 

Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no 

reversible error in the trial court’s interlocutory order. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial 

court’s interlocutory order. The appellants shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this 

Court and the court below.
0 - 1 >1 - 3 >3 - 5 >5 - 10 >10

U.S. Treasuries:

 Bills, Notes, Bonds, FRNs, TIPS 99% 99% 98% 97% 95%

U.S. Government Guaranteed Agencies:

 As detailed in the list of acceptable collateral for the 

iii 225 Program 1 97% - 99% 97% - 99% 97% - 98% 96% - 97% 94% - 95%

Notes:

Acceptance of Bonds Secured by Government

Obligations in Lieu of Bonds with Sureties

31 CFR Part 225

1 A detailed list of acceptable collateral for the 225 Program can be obtained from www.treasurydirect.gov.

Collateral Margins Table*

Effective: November 1, 2023

Margins for Securities

(% of Market Value)

DURATION BUCKETS

Securities

* This document is for informational purposes only and subject to change without notice.

 It is not binding on either the Treasury or the Federal Reserve System (FRS) in any particular transaction.

All pledged collateral must be transferable and owned by the depositary free and clear of all liens, charges, or claims.
No. 52462.

protest 130353-K (St. Albans).

#### Rev. J. A. Dutil, M. S. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

An examination of the record disclosing that the protest was not filed within the time specified in section 514, Tariff Act of 1930, the motion to dismiss was granted.
EX-4.1





 Exhibit 4.1 
  





 
 DATE OF ISSUE CERTIFICATE NUMBER RUN/TFR. NO. REGISTER NUMBER OF SHARE(S) Autohome Inc. (Incorporated in the Cayman Islands with limited
liability) SHARE CERTIFICATE HONG KONG SHARE REGISTER THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE UNDERMENTIONED PERSON(S) IS/ARE THE REGISTERED HOLDER(S) OF FULLY PAID ORDINARY SHARE(S) OF NOMINAL VALUE US$0.0025 PER SHARE IN THE SHARE CAPITAL OF AUTOHOME INC.
(THE “COMPANY”) AS DETAILED BELOW SUBJECT TO THE MEMORANDUM AND ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION OF THE COMPANY. CODE: SPECIMEN NUMBER OF SHARE(S): GIVEN UNDER THE SECURITIES SEAL OF THE COMPANY ON THE DATE OF ISSUE STATED ABOVE. DIRECTOR HONG KONG
SHARE REGISTRAR: NO TRANSFER OF THE WHOLE OR ANY PORTION OF THE ABOVE SHARE(S) CAN BE REGISTERED UNLESS ACCOMPANIED BY THIS SHARE CERTIFICATE. COMPUTERSHARE HONG KONG INVESTOR SERVICES LIMITED, SHOPS 1712-1716, 17TH FLOOR, HOPEWELL CENTRE, 183
QUEEN’S ROAD EAST, WANCHAI, HONG KONG. Computershare
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
                    The Schedule contains summary financial
                    information extracted from the financial
                    statements for World Monitor Trust--Series B
                    and is qualified in its entirety by reference
                    to such financial statements
</LEGEND>

<RESTATED>
<CIK>               1051823
<NAME>              World Monitor Trust--Series B
<MULTIPLIER>        1

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  Jan-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    Jun-25-1999
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-Mos

<CASH>                          19,173,986

<SECURITIES>                    612,400

<RECEIVABLES>                   76,914

<ALLOWANCES>                    0

<INVENTORY>                     0

<CURRENT-ASSETS>                19,863,300

<PP&E>                          0

<DEPRECIATION>                  0

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  19,863,300

<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           470,605

<BONDS>                         0

<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0

<PREFERRED>                     0

<COMMON>                        0

<OTHER-SE>                      19,392,695

<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    19,863,300

<SALES>                         0

<TOTAL-REVENUES>                2,819,428

<CGS>                           0

<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0

<OTHER-EXPENSES>                1,084,491

<LOSS-PROVISION>                0

<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0

<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0

<INCOME-TAX>                    0

<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0

<DISCONTINUED>                  0

<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0

<CHANGES>                       0

<NET-INCOME>                    1,734,937

<EPS-BASIC>                   13.03

<EPS-DILUTED>                   0

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE WELLBUTRIN SR/ZYBAN ANTITRUST )

LITIGATION ) Master File No. 02-CV-4398

_________________________________________ )

)

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: )

ALL ACTIONS )

_________________________________________ )

REFERRAL ORDER

AND NOW, this day of December, 2002, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to 28

U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a), that this action is REFERRED to the

Honorable Jacob P. Hart, United States Magistrate Judge, for the supervision of all discovery

matters.

BY THE COURT:

_____________________________

BRUCE W. KAUFFMAN, J.

Case 2:02-cv-04398-BWK Document 12 Filed 12/04/2002 Page 1 of 1
No. 59407.

protests 224177-K, etc. (New York).

#### Regal Accessories, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of articles of wearing apparel in chief value of silk the same in all material respects as those the subject of *United States*v. *The Specialty House, Inc., Bryant & Heffernan, Inc., et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 136, C. A. D. 585), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 63586.

protests 280452-K(A) and 301972-K (New York).

#### Roberts Reilly & Sons *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of studs and nails similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Fastening Devices, Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(40 Cust. Ct. 345, C.D. 2004), the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (1) The items marked “A” at 15 percent under the provision in paragraph 332, as modified, *supra,*for machined studs; (2) the items marked “B” at two-tenths of 1 cent per pound under the provision in paragraph 331, as modified, *supra,*for nails, made of iron or steel wire, not less than 1 inch in length nor smaller than sixty-five one-thousandths of 1 inch in diameter; and (3) the items marked “C” at 1% cents per pound under paragraph 331 of the act as steel nails, not specially provided for.
Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE WELLBUTRIN SR/ZYBAN ANTITRUST :

LITIGATION :

_________________________________________ : Master File No. 02-CV-4398

:

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO :

ALL ACTIONS :

O R D E R

AND NOW this 3rd day of February, 2004, as all matters for which this action has

been referred to me have been completed, the Clerk is directed to remove the above-captioned case

from my docket. 

BY THE COURT

____________________________________

M. FAITH ANGELL 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:02-cv-04398-BWK Document 38 Filed 02/03/2004 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

ORDER FAX FORM

If you want your Order faxed,

 please provide names and fax numbers below.

 Thank you.

CASE NO. 02-4398

TODAY’S DATE: February 3, 2004 LAW CLERK’S INITIALS: JJK

NAME FAX NUMBER (Area Code & Number)

1. Anthony J. Bolognese, Esq. 215-814-6764

2. Marc A. Topaz, Esq. 610-667-7056

Joseph H. Meltzer, Esq.

3. J. Douglas Richards, Esq. 212-868-1229

Michael M. Buckman, Esq

4. Thomas M. Sobol, Esq. 617-482-3003

Jeniene Andrews-Matthews, Esq.

5. Christopher A. O’Hara, Esq. 206-623-0594

6. Mark S. Stewart, Esq. 215-864-8999

Leslie E. John, Esq

7. William J. Baer, Esq. 202-942-5999

Kenneth A. Letzler, Esq.

Cathy Hoffman, Esq.

Amy R. Mudge, Esq.

June Im, Esq.

Case 2:02-cv-04398-BWK Document 38 Filed 02/03/2004 Page 2 of 2
### To t\ylHow $4 Mrfy Loftc^ffl l^i^S -01 RECEIVED IN COURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALS APR-06-2015 

### -El Gin, /,dyM<L£ *W± ltdfcr 4® £^zk y&uif fflSSt^a***:*. &v ft+ccuter^ JZ rJen+4 f^o /4&CO /p f^J fir ftifillc QT ftjp $tyftU<Q tfbtxfiTk<L L^f^O pLao- Uh,e/*S$4<u».dm AJ**d jidy) Rectus 3- £o*<£ d&/d by My /fa&awty Alor to ?44. 4h. ^4e^J 4t> X/U-^ gr ^ud^^ec^f- ^T Ttotcl Wm To a^yj &U&JJQhfU > $&ddyirhuJd,pccUi */-/#//> &</ IQtA/y4i\4iAa EUc (£>jJA £m be. ~r^Sr^ej t{yi ofple.r rD ffrg^-e. 212 c?^W aW L&fa-toj4/yd 4-Ul CfJm^ d^CohVrdfeid 5op/^*^^ ^k^ 

### 4-0/ $ f^V^sffar $ca PppQtSiAzdfr4/s>m*ydo //dp U*l~ &pfe*d did CM^ &t*d ddp &?/A St)u^~lU^ cg[UJ &- Ah&j corpus do Y<zaaJn My yr*L«y/t?i*1 pgJz p/*.&&<* 22f2 &/otiT f/e*^ /4u^&u^ 

### 1]toko <u>c(J £/Jp ln*~ &c+i My fruio^kcr pozA //e/y^ $od$U H^d patted fliAay •JityJ**- 4o ge-ek Hdp emJiA C^r. /Vb ,f<o3^73&3>3 ikK fao^i cwwlml Di^4rL4 /je>uA~Moy s>&*d ®4r jO#£*#£. fay



### A^o^o l4 h )/ery bed.To /W #§§Ya,\Jtdtd &<,YCl&I fttenufr1 0^

& cLHel fn 4Lh flccf Look 4£ ftfo M<d fr Vfol&J- pug* &f-#u. 32 &i*n fl-£kl*§ 4t> l&ok. i*cld iUi L^c jo* Udp ftkel-ye* 60/Jf 2P1{J-c h<^n Uc^ei Uffi fllbj ®4r y<ier£ /Uo^° OT CQi^J^ /e^S



### ®J$zX i(S j-Luf^ ti^isDoy yc!L(A Lqja lidf Vm. t4^^6iTO^ CflffU^i &V L<*h VimJitd ^fc^o^ Jolto Co44 ^J]fl Ke. VOL hyQ^<_ '^L Ttv^kyocA ItA cg/v/g^g^- $iaJ f^Y tUtt yo^ flap ^, po/il,
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Melinda S. Urion, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer andTreasurer of AmerUs Group Co., certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of AmerUs Group Co.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared; b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and34-47986]; c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Dated: August 6, 2004     By /s/ Melinda S. Urion      Melinda S. Urion   Executive Vice President,   Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer   AmerUs Group Co.
43
# C_2016326EN.01000901.xml

| 5.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/9

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal de Justiça (Portugal) lodged on 23 May 2016 — Fidelidade-Companhia de Seguros SA v Caisse Suisse de Compensation and Others

(Case C-287/16)

(2016/C 326/17)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Referring court

Supremo Tribunal de Justiça

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Fidelidade-Companhia de Seguros SA

Appellant:

Respondents: Caisse Suisse de Compensation, Fundo de Garantia Automóvel, Sandra Cristina Chrystello Pinto Moreira Pereira, Sandra Manuela Teixeira Gomes Seemann, Catarina Ferreira Seemann, José Batista Pereira

Respondents:

Question referred

Question referred

Do Article 3(1) of Directive 72/166/EEC, (1) Article 2(1) of Directive 84/5/EEC, (2) and Article 1 of Directive 90/232/EEC, (3) on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles, preclude national legislation which provides that an insurance contract shall be null and void in the event of false statements concerning the owner of the motor vehicle and the identity of its usual driver, where the contract was concluded by a person who has no economic interest in the use of the vehicle and where there is an underlying fraudulent intent on the part of the interested parties (policy holder, owner of the vehicle and the usual driver) to obtain cover for risks in respect of the use of motor vehicles by means of: (i) concluding a contract that the insurer would not have entered if it had known the identity of the policyholder and (ii) paying a premium lower than would be payable having regard to the age of the usual driver?

1

2

3

---

(1)  Council Directive 72/166/EEC of 24 April 1972 on the approximation of the laws of Member States relating to insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles, and to the enforcement of the obligation to insure against such liability (OJ 1972 L 103, p. 1).

1

(2)  Second Council Directive 84/5/EEC of 30 December 1983 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles (OJ 1984 L 8, p. 17).

2

(3)  Third Council Directive 90/232/EEC of 14 May 1990 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles (OJ 1990 L 129, p. 33).

3

---
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this date I caused a true and correct copy of Defendant’s

Memorandum of Law in Reply to Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendant’s Motion for

Summary Judgment, to be served by Hand-Delivery, properly addressed, upon the

following:

Walter D. Schirrmacher, Esquire

JAMES, JARRETT & SCHWARTZ, P.C.

Stephen Girard Building, 9th Floor

21 South 12th Street

Philadelphia, PA 19107

 

SIDNEY L. GOLD, ESQUIRE

DATE:______________ 

Case 2:02-cv-04352-JF Document 10-2 Filed 10/03/2003 Page 1 of 1