alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DRAFT

ID

Simple or

Special Name Type Description Error Message 

1 SIMPLE

USSGL ACCOUNT NUMBER Bulk File

A six-digit number used to identify a specific USSGL account.

The USSGL account is invalid. Check Supplement for a valid list of USSGL ac

2 SIMPLE DOLLAR AMOUNT Bulk File

The dollar amount field can be up to 21 numerical characters with no decimals. Last two places are assumed decimal.

The dollar amount field is invalid. The dup to 21 numerical characters with no dtwo places are assumed decimal. 

3 SIMPLE VALID TAS Bulk File Special

The Treasury Account Symbol provided on the bulk file must be valid.

The Treasury Account Symbol provided invalid. Refer to the FAST Book II. 

4 SIMPLE

Trading Partner Agency Identifier and Main Account Bulk File Special

The Trading Partner Agency Identifier and Trading Partner Main Account must be a valid TAS.

The Trading Partner Agency Identifier aMain Account is not a valid TAS. Refer 

7 SIMPLE Debit Credit Indicator SGL Simple Each USSGL account must have a Debit or Credit Indicator.

The Debit or Credit Indicator is requiredattribute table. 

8 SIMPLE Begin End Indicator SGL Simple

Begin End Indicator is required for the applicable USSGL accounts.

Begin End Indicator is required. Refer attribute table. 

9 SIMPLE

Federal Non-Federal Code SGL Simple

Federal Non-Federal Code is required for the applicable USSGL accounts.

Invalid use of the Federal Non-Federal GTAS attribute table. 

U.S. Standard General Ledger

Data Validations - Summary

Part 1SUPPLEMENT

Bulletin No. 2019-10 DRAFT VII VSR - 1
# Nov 19

# image1.jpg
Case 2:02-cv-20135-HB     Document 7-2      Filed 02/23/2004     Page 1 of 1
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT R OSA B UENR OSTR O, Pe titione r, v. ER IC H. HOLDER , Jr., Attorne y Ge ne ra l, R

e sponde nt . No. 11-73181 Age n c y No. A095-451-051 M EM O R ANDUM *

On Pe tition for Re vie w of a n Orde r of the B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a ls Subm itte d August 13, 2014 ** B e fore : SC HR O EDER , THOM AS, and HUR W ITZ, C i rc uit Judge s . R osa B ue nrostro, a native and c itiz e n of M e xic o , pe t itions for re vie w of a B oa rd of Im m igration Appe a l s (“ B IA” ) orde r de ny ing he r m otion to re ope n. W e dism iss thepe tition for re v i e w. W e la c k jurisdic tion to re vie w the B IA’ s de c i sion not to invoke its sua 

# F IL ED AUG 15 2014 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).sponte a

uthority to re ope n proc e e dings under 8 C .F.R . § 1003.2(a). Se e Me j ia-He rnande

z v . Holde r , 633 F.3d 818, 823-24 (9th C ir. 2011). PE T IT IO N FO R RE V IE WDISM ISSE D.

1 1 - 7 3 1 8 1 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : CRIMINAL ACTION

:

v. :

:

HAROLD CANNON : No. 05-CR-36

ORDER

AND NOW, this 12th day of August 2009, upon consideration of Defendant Harold

Cannon’s Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc. Nos. 98,

100) and the Government’s Response (Doc. No. 101), and in accordance with the attached

Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that 

(1) Defendant’s § 2255 Motion (Doc. Nos. 98, 100) is DENIED; 

(2) Defendant’s Request for a Certificate of Appealability is DENIED; and

(3) The Clerk shall mark the corresponding civil action for Defendant’s Motion (Civ.

A. No. 09-2102) CLOSED for statistical purposes.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Michael M. Baylson

 

Michael M. Baylson, U.S.D.J.

O:\Shelley\05-36 USA v. Cannon (habeas)\Order re 2255.wpd

Case 2:05-cr-00036-MMB Document 103 Filed 08/13/09 Page 1 of 1
# C_2017392EN.01003001.xml

| 20.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 392/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 392/30

---

Order of the General Court of 20 September 2017 — Berliner Stadtwerke v EUIPO (berlinGas)

(Case T-402/16) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Application for EU word mark berlinGas - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Action manifestly unfounded in law))

(2017/C 392/38)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Berliner Stadtwerke GmbH (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: O. Spieker, A. Schönfleisch and M. Alber, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: R. Manea and D. Hanf, agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 May 2016 (Case R 291/2016-1), relating to the application for registration of the word sign berlinGas as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | Berliner Stadtwerke GmbH is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Berliner Stadtwerke GmbH is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 335, 12.9.2016.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK>    0001051830
<NAME>   MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST IV
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             DEC-26-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-25-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                   412,372
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,340
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               419,712
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 419,712
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,340
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    400,000
<COMMON>                                        12,372
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   419,712
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,680
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 14,680
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             14,680
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    14,680
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
No. 64064.

protest 59/19858 (New York).

#### Horrockses (U.S.A.), Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

The protest was dismissed.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

July 13, 2011 

0706 

Order 

 

July 13, 2011 

142742 

GEORGE FROMMERT, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 142742 

 COA: 292097 

Oakland CC: 2008-090275-NO 

TEERA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, 

Defendant/ 

Cross-Defendant-Appellee, 

and 

KASCO, INC., 

 Defendant/Cross-Plaintiff. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the December 21, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered and, pursuant to MCR 7.302(H)(1), in 

lieu of granting leave to appeal, we VACATE the judgment of the Court of Appeals and 

we REMAND this case to the Court of Appeals for reconsideration in light of Loweke v 

Ann Arbor Ceiling & Partition Co, LLC, 489 Mich ___ (Docket No. 141168, decided 

June 6, 2011). 

 ZAHRA, J., did not participate because he was on the Court of Appeals panel.
No. 63593.

protest 59/5295 (New York).

#### John French Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Since the protest was filed more than 60 days after liquidation, it was dismissed as untimely, by virtue of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

:

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CRIMINAL ACTION

:

v. :

:

TYREE STRATTON : No. 05-68-2

:

ORDER

AND NOW, this 5

th day of January, 2021, upon consideration of Defendant Tyree 

Stratton’s pro se “Motions for Reduction in Sentence Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A) and 

the CARES Act” (ECF Nos. 205, 208), the Government’s response in opposition (ECF No. 206),

and Defendant’s supplemental submission (ECF Nos. 207), it is hereby ORDERED that 

Defendant’s Motions are DENIED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Mitchell S. Goldberg

MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG, J.

Case 2:05-cr-00068-MSG Document 212 Filed 01/05/21 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1422 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1422

  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat certain farming 
  business machinery and equipment as 5-year property for purposes of 
                             depreciation.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 22, 2017

Ms. Klobuchar (for herself, Mr. Roberts, and Mr. Tester) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                                Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to treat certain farming 
  business machinery and equipment as 5-year property for purposes of 
                             depreciation.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Agriculture Equipment and Machinery 
Depreciation Act''.

SEC. 2. CERTAIN FARMING BUSINESS MACHINERY AND EQUIPMENT TREATED AS 5-
              YEAR PROPERTY.

    (a) In General.--Clause (vii) of section 168(e)(3)(B) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``the original use 
of which commences with the taxpayer after December 31, 2008, and which 
is placed in service before January 1, 2010'' and inserting ``the 
original use of which commences with the taxpayer after the date of the 
enactment of the Agriculture Equipment and Machinery Depreciation 
Act''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to property placed in service after the date of the enactment of 
this Act.
                                 <all>
```
**Exhibit 23.2****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ENGINEERS**We refer to our report auditing estimates of the natural gas,natural gas liquids and conventional oil reserves attributableto Husky Energy Inc. (the “Company”) as ofDecember 31, 2005 (the “Report”).We hereby consent to references to our name in theCompany’s Annual Report onForm 40-F to befiled with the United States Securities and Exchange Commissionpursuant to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, andthe Company’s registration statement onForm F-9 (FileNo. 333-117972).We also confirm that we have read the Company’s AnnualInformation Form for the year ended December 31, 2005 datedMarch 14, 2006 and that we have no reason to believe thatthere are any misrepresentations in the information contained init that was derived from the Report or that is within ourknowledge as a result of the services we performed in connectionwith such Report.Sincerely,**McDaniel & Associates Consultants Ltd.**/s/ P.A. Welch P.A. WelchPresident & Managing DirectorCalgary, Alberta, CanadaMarch 14, 2006
Case 2:03-cv-06604-JP Document 481 Filed 04/18/12 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:03-cv-06604-JP Document 481 Filed 04/18/12 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:03-cv-06604-JP Document 481 Filed 04/18/12 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:03-cv-06604-JP Document 481 Filed 04/18/12 Page 4 of 4
Exhibit 13.1

Officer Certifications

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States
Code), each of the undersigned officers of América Móvil, S.A.B. de C.V., a sociedad anónima bursátil de capital variable organized under the laws of Mexico (the Company), does hereby certify to such
officers knowledge that:

The annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 (the Form 20-F) of
the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company.

Dated: May 25, 2010



/s/ Daniel Hajj AboumradDaniel Hajj AboumradChief Executive Officer


Dated: May 25, 2010



/s/ Carlos José García Moreno ElizondoCarlos José García Moreno ElizondoChief Financial Officer


A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
From: "Littaua, Renee@ARB" <rlittaua@arb.ca.gov> 

To: Jeffrey Buss/R9/USEPA/US@EPA 

Cc: "Fletcher, Bob@ARB" <rfletche@arb.ca.gov>, "Simeroth, Dean@ARB" <dsimerot@arb.ca.gov>, "Cayabyab, Adrian@

<acayabya@arb.ca.gov> 

Date: 10/20/2009 02:13 PM 

Subject: FW: CaRFG 3 and the AERP 

Hi Jeffrey – No refineries have submitted an AERP, we expect that all refineries will be complying with the 

RFG3 amendments in 2010. We do not have a report on that – look for update next spring. Kinder 

Morgan has set a pipeline spec for RFG3 for Jan 2010 such that all RFG3 entering the Kinder Morgan 

pipeline will be capable of accepting 10% ethanol. So between the Kinder Morgan spec, and the federal 

RFS2 blending requirements, and the RFG3 amendments, we expect almost all gasoline in California 

(pipeline or not) to be capable of accepting 10% ethanol. (It is possible to make an E0, E10, or 

anywhere in between blend that complies with the new RFG3 amendments, it is possible to put a <E10 

blend in a proprietary pipeline, and I am wary of absolutes, but for planning purposes would assume 

E10.) 

 

Hope that helps. Call if you have questions. 

 

Renee Littaua, P.E. 

Manager, Fuels Section 

California Air Resources Board 

(916) 322-6019 

mailto:rlittaua@arb.ca.gov 

From: Vergara, Floyd@ARB 

Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2009 1:17 PM

To: Littaua, Renee@ARB

Subject: FW: CaRFG 3 and the AERP 

 

Renee, 

 

Do you know anything about this? Should this go to Brisby? 

 

Floyd 

 

From: Jenne, Bob@ARB 

Sent: Tuesday, October 20, 2009 12:49 PM

To: Simeroth, Dean@ARB; Vergara, Floyd@ARB

Cc: Nagy, Claudia@ARB

Subject: RE: CaRFG 3 and the AERP 

 

Dean and Floyd: Could you please forward the email below to the appropriate staff 

person to respond to this person from US EPA Region IX? Thanks. 

 

From: Buss.Jeffrey@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Buss.Jeffrey@epamail.epa.gov] 

Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 10:02 AM

To: Jenne, Bob@ARB

Subject: CaRFG 3 and the AERP 
 

Good morning Mr. Jenne, 

Last April several of my colleagues and I met with you, Tom Jennings and ARB 

staff about the California fuels programs. I wanted to follow up with a comment 

that was made during that discussion. As I understand it, all gasoline entering 

California pipelines will be capable of accepting 10% ethanol and meeting the 

CaRFG 3 standard by 2010. However, a refinery could submit an alternative 

emissions reduction plan (AERP), which would postpone compliance until 2012. 

From out conversation last April, I recall hearing that refineries had just a few 

months to submit such an AERP and that none were expected to do so. Further, 

CARB and CEC would be reporting CaRFG 3 compliance to their Board later this 

year. My question is whether any refinery in fact submitted an AERP and whether 

there is now a report or other document to confirm this. 

If you have any questions about this message or need more information, please 

reply by e-mail to this message or call the number listed below. 

Best,

Jeffrey Buss 

U.S. EPA Region 9 

415-947-4152
No. 52228.

protests 38997-K/89570, etc. (Chicago).

#### G. W. Sheldon & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr v. United States,*324 U. S. 83.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries. The protests were sustained to this extent.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1473 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1473

   To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for a five-year 
   extension to the homeless veterans reintegration programs and to 
  provide clarification regarding eligibility for services under such 
                               programs.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 29, 2017

Mr. Boozman (for himself and Mr. Tester) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for a five-year 
   extension to the homeless veterans reintegration programs and to 
  provide clarification regarding eligibility for services under such 
                               programs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Homeless Veterans' Reintegration 
Programs Reauthorization Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS HOMELESS 
              VETERANS REINTEGRATION PROGRAMS.

    (a) Five-Year Extension of Homeless Veterans Reintegration 
Programs.--Section 2021(e)(F) of title 38, United States Code, is 
amended by striking ``2017'' and inserting ``2022''.
    (b) Five-Year Extension of Homeless Women Veterans and Homeless 
Veterans With Children Reintegration Grant Program.--Section 
2021A(f)(1) of such title is amended by striking ``2017'' and inserting 
``2022''.
    (c) Clarification of Eligibility for Services Under Homeless 
Veterans Reintegration Programs.--Section 2021(a) of such title is 
amended by striking ``reintegration of homeless veterans into the labor 
force.'' and inserting the following: ``reintegration into the labor 
force of--
            ``(1) homeless veterans;
            ``(2) veterans participating in the Department of Veterans 
        Affairs supported housing program for which rental assistance 
        is provided pursuant to section 8(o)(19) of the United States 
        Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437f(o)(19));
            ``(3) Indians who are veterans and receiving assistance 
        under the Native American Housing Assistance and Self 
        Determination Act of 1996 (25 U.S.C. 4101 et seq.);
            ``(4) veterans who are transitioning from being 
        incarcerated; and
            ``(5) veterans participating in the Department of Veterans 
        Affairs rapid rehousing and prevention program authorized in 
        section 2044 of this title.''.
                                 <all>
```
----

Prior notification of a concentration

(Case COMP/M.4127 — Edison/EDF Energia Italia)

Candidate case for simplified procedure

(2006/C 184/05)

(Text with EEA relevance)

----

(1)OJ L 24, 29.1.2004, p. 1.

(2)OJ C 56, 5.3.2005, p. 32.

----
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 2736-046]

                    a.                     *Project Name and Number:*                     American Falls Hydroelectric Project No. 2736-046.                

                    b.                     *Applicant:*                     Idaho Power Company.                

                    c.                     *Date and Time of Meeting:*                     November 27, 2023, from 11:00 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. Eastern Standard Time.                

                    d.                     *FERC Contact:*                     Golbahar Mirhosseini,                     *Golbahar.Mirhosseini@ferc.gov.*

                    e.                     *Purpose of Meeting:*                     Commission staff will hold a meeting with staff from the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes to discuss the Tribe's comments on scoping document and any concerns regarding the proposed American Falls Hydroelectric Project. The meeting will be held remotely via Microsoft Teams.                

f. All local, State, and Federal agencies, Native American Tribes, and other interested parties are invited to attend the meeting; however, participation will be limited to representation of the Shoshone-Bannock Tribe and the Commission's representatives. A summary of the meeting will be placed in the public record of this proceeding.

                    g. Please email Golbahar Mirhosseini at                     *golbahar.mirhosseini@ferc.gov*                     by November 22, 2023 at 4:30 p.m. EST, to RSVP and to receive specific instructions on how to participate.                

Dated: November 13, 2023.

Debbie-Anne A. Reese,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2023-25528 Filed 11-17-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P