alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
| COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS TO FIXED CHARGES |   |
|---------------------------------------------------|--------|
| (In Thousands, Except Ratios)                     |   |
|                                              |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|                                              |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|                                              |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|                                              |   | Twelve months Ended |   |   | Twelve months Ended |   |   | Twelve months Ended |   |   | Twelve months Ended |   |   | Twelve months Ended |   |
|                                              |   | December 31, |   |   | December 31, |   |   | December 31, |   |   | December 31, |   |   | December 31, |   |
|                                              |   | 2010 |   |   | 2009 |   |   | 2008 |   |   | 2007 |   |   | 2006 |   |
|                                              |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|                                              |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Earnings: (1)                                     |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Net income                                        |   | $ | 123,854 |   |   | $ | 107,428 |   |   | $ | 111,136 |   |   | $ | 106,506 |   |   | $ | 91,377 |   |
| Income taxes                                      |   |   | 77,100 |   |   |   | 59,244 |   |   |   | 67,560 |   |   |   | 66,741 |   |   |   | 47,691 |   |
| Fixed Charges (See below) (2)                     |   |   | 81,803 |   |   |   | 80,107 |   |   |   | 80,611 |   |   |   | 81,145 |   |   |   | 78,345 |   |
|   Total adjusted earnings               |   | $ | 282,757 |   |   | $ | 246,779 |   |   | $ | 259,307 |   |   | $ | 254,392 |   |   | $ | 217,413 |   |
| Fixed charges: (2)                                |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
|   Total interest expense                |   | $ | 81,425 |   |   | $ | 79,203 |   |   | $ | 79,877 |   |   | $ | 80,576 |   |   | $ | 77,538 |   |
|   Interest component of rents           |   |   | 378 |   |   |   | 904 |   |   |   | 734 |   |   |   | 569 |   |   |   | 807 |   |
|     Total fixed charges       |   | $ | 81,803 |   |   | $ | 80,107 |   |   | $ | 80,611 |   |   | $ | 81,145 |   |   | $ | 78,345 |   |
|                                              |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Ratio of earnings to fixed charges                |   |   | 3.5 |   |   |   | 3.1 |   |   |   | 3.2 |   |   |   | 3.1 |   |   |   | 2.8 |   |
# C_2017022EN.01006001.xml

| 23.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/60 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/60

---

Order of the General Court of 14 November 2016 — Trost Auto Service Technik v EUIPO (AUTOSERVICE.COM)

(Case T-259/16) (1)

1

(2017/C 022/80)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Sixth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 251, 11.7.2016.

1

---
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Ronald J. Ivans,
Chief Financial Officer of the managing owner, Prudential Securities Futures Management Inc. (the Managing Owner), of World Monitor TrustSeries B (Series B), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | Series Bs Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 25, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Quarterly Report),
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Series B.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                            
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Ronald J. Ivans                                                         
|Ronald J. Ivans Chief Financial Officer of the Managing Owner August 9, 2004
---

CERTIFICATIONS

The undersigned, Ross J. Tocher, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | the shell company report on Form 20-F of Qwick Media Inc.
      for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the Report) fully complies with
      the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
      of 1934; and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Qwick Media Inc.                                                                      

Dated: February 3, 2011

| | /s/
      Ross J. Tocher             
| | -------------------------------------
| | Ross J. Tocher                       
| | President and Chief Executive Officer
| | (Principal Executive Officer)        

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Qwick Media Inc.
and will be retained by Qwick Media Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

TRUSTEES OF THE NATIONAL ELEVATOR : 

INDUSTRY PENSION, HEALTH BENEFIT : 

AND EDUCATIONAL FUNDS, : 

 : 

 Plaintiffs, : 

 : 

 v. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-4351 

 : 

AL’AN EL MAINTENANCE CORP. : 

 : 

 Defendant. : 

PRAECIPE TO DISMISS

 Plaintiffs, Trustees of the National Elevator Industry Pension, Health Benefit and 

Educational Funds, respectfully request that the Court dismiss this action pursuant to Rule 41 of the 

Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 

 

 Respectfully submitted, 

DATE: October 28, 2002 

 O'DONOGHUE & O'DONOGHUE 

 Constitution Place, Suite 515 

 325 Chestnut Street 

 Philadelphia, PA 19106 

 Telephone (215) 629-4970 

 Facsimile (215) 629-4996 

 By: 

 Robert P. Curley 

 Attorney I.D. No. 55760 

 By: ________________________ 

 David D. Capuano 

 Attorney I.D. No. 70238 

 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 

Case 2:02-cv-04351-JG Document 6 Filed 10/28/2002 Page 1 of 1
No. 60015.

#### The National Sugar Refining Company *v.*United States,

protest 258230-K (New York).

Johnson, Judge.

This is a protest against the collector’s assessment of duty on cane sugar imported from Cuba at 0.5110925 cents per pound under paragraph 501 of the Tariff Act of 1930 [as modified by the exclusive trade agreement with Cuba, T. D. 51819]. The classification and rate are not in question, but it is claimed that duty was assessed on too great a weight of merchandise.

The protest herein, in the name of The National Sugar Refining Company, was signed by Thomas S. Coyle, attorney. The collector’s memorandum states that he did not review the protest, because of the lack of a power of attorney authorizing Thomas S. Coyle to file the same.

At the trial, Harry Letzler, assistant treasurer and office manager of the plaintiff company, testified that he is responsible for the financial and accounting operations of the firm, including the payment of duties on shipments from abroad. He stated that Thomas Coyle has been handling customs matters for the firm for about 13 years; that power to sign and file protests had been vested in him by the officers of the company; and that he had that power at the time this protest was filed.

On the merits, counsel for the plaintiff introduced into evidence from the official files customs Form 6067-A, a summary sheet on raw sugar, showing the weights of the involved merchandise (plaintiff’s exhibit 1).

At the conclusion of the trial, counsel for the Government stated:

> In view of the fact that the plaintiff has now proven the power of Mr. Coyle to file a protest and we now have before the Court the official weights found by the Government, Government counsel.recommends that allowance be made in accordance with the weights now found on Plaintiff’s Exhibit #1.

Plaintiff’s exhibit 1 shows the net total weights of the sugar found by the public weigher, the customs total determined by the use of a conversion factor, the tare, and the dutiable quantities, which consist of the customs totals, less the tare. The latter quantities add up to 10,363,069 pounds, the amount claimed by plaintiff to be correct.

On the record presented, we hold that the merchandise is properly dutiable at the appropriate rate under paragraph 501 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified, on the basis of a net weight of 10,363,069 pounds.

The protest is sustained, and judgment will be rendered directing the collector to reliquidate the entry and make refund accordingly.
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 644 Filed 12/02/2009 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:05-cv-00666-SD Document 644 Filed 12/02/2009 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:05-cv-01099-ER   Document 107   Filed 07/08/15   Page 1 of 8

Case 2:05-cv-01099-ER   Document 107   Filed 07/08/15   Page 2 of 8

Case 2:05-cv-01099-ER   Document 107   Filed 07/08/15   Page 3 of 8

Case 2:05-cv-01099-ER   Document 107   Filed 07/08/15   Page 4 of 8

Case 2:05-cv-01099-ER   Document 107   Filed 07/08/15   Page 5 of 8

Case 2:05-cv-01099-ER   Document 107   Filed 07/08/15   Page 6 of 8

Case 2:05-cv-01099-ER   Document 107   Filed 07/08/15   Page 7 of 8

Case 2:05-cv-01099-ER   Document 107   Filed 07/08/15   Page 8 of 8
# C_2017178EN.01002001.xml

| 6.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/20

---

Order of the General Court of 6 April 2017 — Klausner Holz Niedersachsen v Commission

(Case T-101/16) (1)

1

((Action for failure to act - State aid - Supply of timber - Preliminary examination of an alleged State aid granted by the German authorities in the form of contracts for the supply of timber - Commission’s failure to adopt a position within a reasonable period of time - Manifest inadmissibility))

(2017/C 178/26)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Klausner Holz Niedersachsen GmbH (Saalburg-Ebersdorf, Germany) (represented by: D. Reich, C. Hipp and T. Ilgner, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn and T. Maxian Rusche, acting as agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application based on Article 265 TFEU seeking a declaration that the Commission unlawfully failed to take a decision, within a reasonable period of time, in the context of the preliminary examination of an alleged State aid granted to the applicant by the German authorities in the form of contracts for the supply of timber.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible.

| 2. | Klausner Holz Niedersachsen GmbH is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Klausner Holz Niedersachsen GmbH is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 145, 25.4.2016.

1

---
# C_2018166EN.01002701.xml

| 14.5.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 166/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.5.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 166/27

---

Judgment of the General Court of 22 March 2018 — Shire Pharmaceuticals Ireland v EMA

(Case T-80/16) (1)

1

((Medicinal products for human use - Validation of an application for designation as an orphan medicinal product - Significant benefit - EMA decision refusing to validate an application for designation as an orphan medicinal product - Article 3(1)(b) and Article 5(1), (2) and (4) of Regulation (EC) No 141/2000))

(2018/C 166/34)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Shire Pharmaceuticals Ireland Ltd (Dublin, Ireland) (represented by: D. Anderson QC, M. Birdling, barrister, G. Castle and S. Cowlishaw, solicitors)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Medicines Agency (EMA) (represented by: T. Jabłoński, N. Rampal Olmedo and M. Tovar Gomis, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: K. Petersen and A. Sipos, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of the EMA decision of 15 December 2015 refusing to validate the application submitted by Shire Pharmaceuticals Ireland for designation of Idursulfase-IT as an orphan medicinal product.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) dated 15 December 2015 refusing to validate the application submitted by Shire Pharmaceuticals Ireland Ltd seeking the designation of Idursulfase-IT as an orphan medicinal product; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) dated 15 December 2015 refusing to validate the application submitted by Shire Pharmaceuticals Ireland Ltd seeking the designation of Idursulfase-IT as an orphan medicinal product;

| 2. | Orders the EMA to bear its own costs, as well as those of Shire Pharmaceuticals Ireland; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the EMA to bear its own costs, as well as those of Shire Pharmaceuticals Ireland;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 136, 18.4.2016.

1

---
T/L S2 15-01 DRAFT IRC Handout 4-2-15

No. USSGL Account Title Anticipated

Budg/

Prop

Norm 

Bal

Begin/

End

Debit/

Credit

Auth 

Type 

Code

Apport 

Cat

Apport 

Cat B

Avail 

Time

BEA 

Cat

Borrow 

Source

Budgetary 

Impact

Indicator

Cohort 

Yr

Cust/

Noncust

Exch/

Nonexc

h

Fed

/NonFed

Trading

 Ptnr

Trading Ptnr 

Main PY Adj

Program 

Indicator

Program 

Rpt Cat

Reimb 

Flag

Year of 

BA

Reduction 

Type

Fund 

Type

Reporting 

Type Code

Financing 

Account

Code

TAS 

Status

Trans. 

Code

201000 Liability for Fund Balance With Treasury N P C B/E D/C F/N ### /#### GA U N U N

DRAFT

USSGL ACCOUNT USSGL ACCOUNT ATTRIBUTES

- USSGL ATTRIBUTES BULK FILE ATTRIBUTES TAS ATTRIBUTES

Attributes to Accounts Report

Part 1 Fiscal Year 2015 Reporting

SUPPLEMENT Section IV

U.S. Government Standard General Ledger
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of RTG Ventures Inc. (the “Company”) on Form
10-K for the period ending August 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Barrington Fludgate,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




/s/
      Barrington FludgateBarrington
      Fludgate
                    Chief
      Financial Officer
                    January
      13, 2009
No. 55184.

#### Philadelphia Brokerage Co. *v.*United States,

protest 130004-K (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16
- 7619

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,

v. DEMETRIUS HARRISON , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. Terrence W. Boyle , District Judge. ( 5:07

- cr
- 00083

- BO

- 1 )

Submitted : April 25, 2017 Decided: May 10, 2017

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and FLOYD , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Demetrius Harrison, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May

- Parker, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Demetrius Harrison appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reduce his sentence of imprisonment by nine months . Because the district court correctly concluded that it lacked the authority to grant Harrison’s motion , we affirm

. See United States v. Goodwyn , 59 6 F.3 d 233, 235

- 36 (4th Cir. 2010). W e dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
(Reap. Dec. 10344)

Entry No. 784360.

#### Metropolitan Industries, Inc. *v.*United States

(Decided October 3, 1962)

*Siegel, Mandell & Davidson*for tbe plaintiff.

*Joseph D. Orwlfoyle,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for tbe defendant.

Ford, Judge:

The appeal for reappraisement listed above has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between tbe respective parties hereto, subject to tbe approval of tbe Court, that tbe export value of .tbe radios covered by tbe invoice embraced by tbe Appeal for Reappraisement enumerated above on or about tbe time of exportation thereof at which time such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in tbe principal market of the country from which exported in tbe usual wholesale quantity and in tbe ordinary course of trade for export to tbe United States including cost of containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing tbe merchandise ready for shipment to tbe United States was the invoice unit values plus export shipping charge of $92.50, net, packed.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that there was no higher value for merchandise such or similar to the merchandise herein at the time of exportation thereof.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the Appeal to Re-appraisement enumerated above may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

Accepting this stipulation as a statement of facts, I find that the involved merchandise is not listed on the final list of articles published in T.D. 54521, effective February 27, 1958, and that export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, and T.D. 54521, effective February 27, 1958, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and I hold that such statutory value is the invoice unit values, plus export shipping charge of $92.50, net, packed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
**Modifications to USSGL Account 299100, TC D438 and TC D622**

**Modification to definition of USSGL Account 299100**

**Account Title:**Other Liabilities - Reductions 

**Account Number:**299100 

**Normal Balance:**Credit 

**Definition:**Other liabilities of reductions where there is not a related budgetary obligation. Use while awaiting a warrant to be issued for a reduction (i.e., rescission, across-the-board reduction, and sequestration). May also be used while awaiting a warrant to be issued for a reduction of unobligated balances of indefinite appropriations derived from the General Fund of the U.S. Government. The warrant must be issued by yearend. This account does not close at yearend.

**Justification:**To clarify that USSGL account 299100 could be used for indefinite appropriations derived from the General Fund of the U.S. Government.

**Modification to TC D438**

**D438**To record a refund of trust or special fund receipts that was received in a ~~prior-year~~ current year. 

**Comment:**See USSGL TC-A712 for refunds of advances. See USSGL TC-D436 for refunds of offsetting collections, other than advances. 

**Budgetary Entry**

Debit 445000 Unapportioned Authority 

Debit 461000 Allotments - Realized Resources 

Debit 462000 Unobligated Funds Exempt From Apportionment 

Debit 465000 Allotments - Expired Authority 

  Credit 411400 Appropriated Receipts Derived From Available Trust or Special Fund Receipts

**Modification to TC D622**

**D622**To record the amount of indefinite appropriation derived from the General Fund of the U.S. Government that is withdrawn due to recoveries of prior-year obligations. 

Comment:****Credit USSGL account 299100 if fund withdrawal does not occur simultaneously****Refer to Office of Management and Budget Circular No. A-11 for the definition of reductions. Reductions include rescissions, across-the-board reductions, and sequestrations. Special and trust funds receiving appropriations from the General Fund of the U.S. Government and/or transfers of unexpended appropriations may record USSGL accounts in the 310000 series.

**Budgetary Entry**

Debit 445000 Unapportioned Authority 

Credit 435400 Appropriation Withdrawn 

**Proprietary Entry**

~~None~~

Debit 310600 Unexpended Appropriations – Adjustments

  Credit 101000 Fund Balance With Treasury

  Credit 299100 Other Liabilities – Reductions

		IRC Handout 4/23/19
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ANDREA CONSTAND, : 

: CIVIL ACTION

Plaintiff, : NO. 05-1099

:

v. :

: 

WILLIAM H. COSBY, JR., :

:

Defendant. :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 6th day of July, 2015, for the reasons 

stated in the accompanying memorandum opinion, it is hereby 

ORDERED as follows:

(1) The Associated Press’s motion to intervene and obtain 

access to documents filed under seal (ECF No. 99) is 

GRANTED;

1

(2) The Clerk of Court shall LIFT the seal on the following 

documents: ECF Nos. 48, 49, 50, 52, 54, 55, 57, 58, 60, 

61, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68;

(3) The motion to admit Joseph Cammarata, Esq., as counsel 

pro hac vice for proposed Intervenors Green, Serignese, 

and Traitz (ECF No. 104) is GRANTED; and

 

1 Per the Court’s June 18, 2015, Order (ECF No, 100), 

the letter from the Associated Press (ECF No. 99) is construed 

as a motion to intervene and obtain access to documents filed 

under seal.

Case 2:05-cv-01099-ER Document 106 Filed 07/06/15 Page 1 of 2
2

(4) The Motion of Tamara Green, Therese Serignese, and Linda 

Traitz to Intervene and Late-File Memorandum in Support 

of Lifting Seal (ECF No. 103) is DENIED as moot.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

/s/ Eduardo C. Robreno

EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, J.

Case 2:05-cv-01099-ER Document 106 Filed 07/06/15 Page 2 of 2