alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE>   
          INDIANAPOLIS POWER & LIGHT COMPANY                       EXHIBIT 12.1

          Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
<CAPTION>
         

                                                     YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                             ---------------------------------------------     
                                               1997              1996              1995
                                             ---------         ---------         ---------
                                                        (Thousands of Dollars)
<S>                                          <C>               <C>               <C>
Earnings, as defined:
     Net income (1)                          $133,402          $122,588          $106,273
     Income taxes                              74,440            67,266            53,568
     Fixed charges, as below                   41,893            48,570            51,778
                                             ---------         ---------         ---------
         Total earnings, as defined          $249,735          $238,424          $211,619
                                             =========         =========         =========
Fixed charges, as defined:
     Interest charges                        $ 41,721          $ 48,406          $ 51,596
     Rental interest factor                       172               164               182
                                             ---------         ---------         ---------
         Total fixed charges, as defined     $ 41,893          $ 48,570          $ 51,778
                                             =========         =========         =========
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges               5.96              4.91              4.09
                                             =========         =========         =========

(1) 1997 Net income excludes after-tax effect of cumulative effect of accounting change

</TABLE>
<PAGE>                                                  Exhibit 24
                        POWER OF ATTORNEY

                 INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY
      Annual Report on Form lO-K for the Fiscal Year Ended
                        December 31, 1997                 

     The undersigned directors of INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY,
an Indiana corporation (the "Company"), do hereby constitute and
appoint E. LINN DRAPER, JR., G. P. MALONEY and P. J. DeMARIA, and
each of them, their attorneys-in-fact and agents, to execute for
them, and in their names, and in any and all of their capacities,
the Annual Report of the Company on Form lO-K, pursuant to Sec-
tion 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 1997, and any and all amendments thereto,
and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and other docu-
ments in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange
Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and
each of them, full power and authority to do and perform every
act and thing required or necessary to be done, as fully to all
intents and purposes as the undersigned might or could do in
person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-
in-fact and agents, or any of them, may lawfully do or cause to
be done by virtue hereof.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have signed these
presents this 28th day of January, 1998.


/s/ Karl G. Boyd                   /s/ G. P. Maloney             
Karl G. Boyd                       G. P. Maloney


/s/ C. R. Boyle, III               /s/ James J. Markowsky        
C. R. Boyle, III                   James J. Markowsky


/s/ G. A. Clark                    /s/ D. B. Synowiec            
G. A. Clark                        D. B. Synowiec


/s/ P. J. DeMaria                  /s/ J. H. Vipperman           
P. J. DeMaria                      J. H. Vipperman


/s/ E. Linn Draper, Jr.            /s/ W. E. Walters             
E. Linn Draper, Jr.                W. E. Walters            


/s/ James A. Kobyra                /s/ E. H. Wittkamper          
James A. Kobyra                    E. H. Wittkamper


/s/ W. J. Lhota                    
Wm J. Lhota
(Reap. Dec. 8623)

Entry No. 781654, etc.

#### Universal Sales Co. *v.*United States

(Decided July 6, 1956)

*Lawrence & Tuttle*for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> It is hereby stipulated as follows concerning the merchandise referred to below:

> 1) The merchandise herein consists of monosodium glutamate known as Ajinomoto and imported in drums from Japan. On or about the date of exportation, such or similar merchandise was not freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of Japan, either for home consumption or for export to the United States, but at that time was freely offered for sale in the United States for domestic consumption as defined in section 402 (e), Tariff Act of 1930, at the following prices:

> CE 781654'! WH 207381 $122.60 per drum including the cost of WH 250421 drums at $5 each WH 26257J

> WH 287671 $114.62 per drum, including the cost of WH 29948J drums at $5 each

> 2) Upon this stipulation this appeal may be deemed to be submitted for decision.

On the agreed facts I find the United States value, as that value is defined in section 402 (e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by-section 8 of the Customs Administrative Act of 1938, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such values were as follows:

> Entry Nos.

> CE 781654'| WH 207381 $122.60 per drum, including the cost of WH 250421 drums at $5 each WH 26257J

> WH 287671 $114.62 per drum, including the cost of WH 29948J drums at $5 each

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
103 NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 10. Advances and Prepayments

Advances and Prepayments as of September 30, 2021, and 2020

(In billions of dollars) 2021 2020

Department of the Treasury ................................................................................................ 256.1 ................................ 68.9 ..............

Department of Health and Human Services................................................................ 70.1 ................................ 106.1 ........................

Department of Defense................................................................................................ 20.7 ................................ 20.5 .....................

Department of Labor................................................................................................ 13.0 ................................ 8.2 .........................

All other................................................................................................................................ 9.4 ................................ 14.9 ...........

Total advances and prepayments ................................................................369.3 ................................218.6 ...................................

In FY 2021, the presentation for advances and prepayments was modified to present the line item separately on the

Balance Sheet. The FY 2020 presentation was modified to conform to the FY 2021 presentation. Advances and prepayments

are assets that represent funds disbursed in contemplation of the future performance of services, receipt of goods, the

incurrence of expenditures, or the receipt of other assets. These include advances to contractors, grantees, Medicare

providers, and state, local, territorial, and tribal governments; travel advances; and prepayments for items such as rents, taxes,

insurance, royalties, commissions, and supplies.

Until such time as the goods or services are received, contract terms are met or progress has been made, or prepaid

expenses expired these should be recorded as assets. Any amounts that are subject to a refund at the time of completion

should be transferred to accounts receivable.

Treasury had the largest increase, $187.2 billion, to advances and prepayments for FY 2021. During FY 2020, Treasury

disbursed $149.5 billion in COVID-19 funds for financial assistance payments to state, local, territorial, and tribal

governments to cover eligible costs incurred as a result of the pandemic. Treasury disbursed an additional $276.7 billion in

FY 2021. The amounts disbursed during FY 2020 and FY 2021 were initially recorded as advances. The advances balance is

subsequently reduced as eligible costs are incurred. Funding for healthcare providers and suppliers under HHS's AAP during

FY 2020 of $103.6 billion were recorded as advances. Pursuant to the Continuing Appropriations Act, 2021 and Other

Extensions Act, CMS delayed repayment of these advances for one year from the date each provider or supplier's AAP was

issued. Collections of these amounts began in April 2021, which reduced the advances balance.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

 : 

LEE ARTERS t/a GREENDALE BUILDERS : CIVIL ACTION - LAW 

 : 

 : 

 Plaintiff, : 

 : 

 v. : 

: No. 02-CV-4388 

ZURICH AMERICAN INSURANCE CO. t/a, : 

ZURICH NORTH AMERICA as successor in : 

Interest to ASSURANCE CO. OF AMERICA, and : 

ASSURANCE CO. OF AMERICA : 

 : 

 Defendants. : 

___________________________________________ : 

AMENDED NOTICE OF APPEAL 

 Notice is hereby given that Lee Arters t/a Greendale Builders (plaintiff) in the 

above named case, hereby appeals to the United States Court of Appeals for Third Circuit 

from the Entry of Judgment granting summary judgment in favor of all defendants, 

entered in this action on November 20, 2003. A copy of the Order being appealed from 

is attached hereto as Exhibit “A”. Plaintiff also hereby appeals Order dated January 5, 

2004 denying Plaintiffs’ Motion for Reconsideration of the Judgment of November 20, 

2003. A copy of the Order being appealed from is attached hereto as Exhibit “B”. 

 VAUGHAN, DUFFY & CONNORS, LLP 

 

 By: 

 Francis X. Nolan, Esquire 

 Attorney I.D. No. 09237 

 Attorney for Plaintiff 

 102 Pickering Way, Suite 400 

 Exton, PA 19341 

 (610) 524-2100 

Date: January 29, 2004 

Case 2:02-cv-04388-JF Document 34 Filed 02/02/2004 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit
      32.1**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Independence Lead Mines Company (the
      "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the period ended December 31, 2007, as filed
      with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
      I, Bernard C. Lannen, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
      of
      2002, that:





1.
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition, and results of operations of the Company.





The
      foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350 and is not being filed for purposes of
      Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to
      be
      incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before
      or
      after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in
      such
      filing.





/s/
      Bernard C. Lannen


President





Dated:
      August 11, 2008
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Merrill Lynch
Preferred Capital Trust III and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding III, L.P.
(the "Partnership") for the period ended September 26, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, John J. Fosina, Controller of Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., the General
Partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Partnership.




                              MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING III, L.P.

                              By:  MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC., as General Partner


                              By:  /s/ JOHN J. FOSINA
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                              Name:    John J. Fosina *
                              Title:   Controller, Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.








Dated: November 6, 2003
_______________________

*  John J. Fosina functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
   and Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership for purposes of Section 906
   of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
No. 51326.

#### Protests 56350-K, etc., of F. B. Vandegrift & Co. et al. (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the *188holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries. The protests were sustained to this extent.
No. 53959.

#### Washington State Liquor Control Board *v.*United States,

protests 123315-K, etc. (Seattle).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 49106.

Suit 4442.

#### *Thorens, Inc.*v. *United States.*

C. D. 730 affirmed November 1, 1943. C. A. D. 261.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY : CIVIL ACTION

:

 v. :

:

DAVID FORREST, et al. : NO. 02-4435

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of January, 2003, it is

Ordered that the CONFERENCE scheduled for Monday, February 3,

2003 at 4:15 p.m. is canceled and rescheduled for Tuesday,

February 18, 2003 at 4:30 p.m.. The conference will be held in

chambers, room 7613 on the 7th floor.

ATTEST: or BY THE COURT

BY: 

 Deputy Clerk Anita B. Brody, J.

Civ 12 (9/83)

Copies FAXED on _________ to: Copies MAILED on ____________ to:

Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 26 Filed 01/14/2003 Page 1 of 1
# C_2018445EN.01001501.xml

| 10.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 445/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.12.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 445/15

---

Judgment of the General Court of 24 October 2018 — Epsilon International v Commission

(Case T-477/16) (1)

((Arbitration clause - Contracts concluded under the Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2007-2013) - Interest in bringing proceedings - Eligible costs - Suspension of payment - Application for annulment - Decision to register the applicant in the central database of the Early Detection and Exclusion System (EDES) - Act not open to challenge - Inadmissibility))

(2018/C 445/19)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Epsilon International SA (Marousi, Greece) (represented by: D. Bogaert and A. Guillerme, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Estrada de Solà, A. Katsimerou and A. Kyratsou, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application, first, under Article 272 TFEU for a declaration (i) that the amounts paid by the Commission under the Briseide, i-SCOPE and Smart-Islands grant agreements constitute eligible costs; (ii) that the Commission’s decisions to suspend payments in respect of the i-Locate, eENV-Plus, GeoSmartCity and c-Space projects are unfounded; (iii) that the Commission’s unlawful conduct caused damage to the applicant; and, second, (i) under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of the decision of the Commission of 17 June 2016 (Ares (2016) 2835215) registering EPSILON in the Early Detection and Exclusion System (EDES) database and (ii) under Article 268 TFEU for the award of compensation in respect of the damage allegedly suffered by the applicant as a result of that act.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Epsilon International SA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Epsilon International SA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 402, 31.10.2016.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<CIK> 0000050172
<NAME> INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1996
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1996
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                    2,515,776
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                    645,043
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                         283,516
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                        31,457
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                 421,692
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,897,484
<COMMON>                                        56,584
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                      731,272
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                            269,071
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>               1,056,927
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          135,000
<PREFERRED>                                     21,977
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                         1,042,104
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                               3,900
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                  39,600
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                        0
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                    101,225
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                29,740
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>               1,467,011
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                3,897,484
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                    1,328,493
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                            86,799
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   1,021,277
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                   1,108,076
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                        220,417
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               2,729
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                 223,146
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        65,993
<NET-INCOME>                                   157,153
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                     10,681
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                  146,472
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                       112,508
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                       41,209
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                         294,341
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0<F1>
<FN>
<F1> All common stock owned by parent company; no EPS required.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
No. 56364.

protest 149296-K (New York).

#### Aero-Sea Shipping Corporation *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the figurines in question are works of art of china or porcelain, which are copies, replicas, or reproductions of original sculptures or statuary produced or created by professional sculptors, valued at more than $2.50 each, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 53488.

protests 133268-K, etc. (New York).

#### Abraham & Straus, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

The protests were dismissed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1  
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                       3,586,163
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                      38,929,563
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                            43,274,158
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                      20,860,005
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                    171,952,999
<ALLOWANCE>                                    974,328
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             320,626,675
<DEPOSITS>                                 222,781,398
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                         68,677,735
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             320,626,675
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              9,969,617
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            2,846,483
<INTEREST-OTHER>                             1,163,690
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            13,979,790
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           7,314,047
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           7,322,964
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        6,656,826
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   37,981
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              4,377,326
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,999,897
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,828,862
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.42
<LOANS-NON>                                    910,732
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                              1,139,147
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               971,639
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  195,962
<RECOVERIES>                                   154,671
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                              974,328
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                           974,328
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>