alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.1****CERTIFICATIONS**I, Thomas M. Belk, Jr., certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Belk, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or causedsuch internal control over financial reporting to be designed under oursupervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability offinancial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.Date: September 7, 2006/s/ Thomas M. Belk
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906**


**OF
      THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**











In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of Finity Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on
      Form 10-QSB for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Form 10-QSB”), I,
      Fred Nazem, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
      2002,that;





(1)
      The
      Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Form 10-QSB fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.







By: /s/
      Fred F. Nazem


Chief Executive Officer







Date:
      May 12, 2006


14
Case No. 13,094.

#### SMITH v. POTTS.

[1 Cranch, C. C. 123.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

June, 1803.

Continuance — Inability to Find Witness.

The court will not continue a cause because the plaintiff cannot find out the place of residence of his witness.

Continuance on the ground that the plaintiff could not find out the residence of his witness — refused.
U.S. Department ofTransportation Docket Management System 1200 NewJersey Avenue, SE. 

# AVIATION

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140 Washington, DC 20590 Attn: Vicky Dunne Subject: Petition for Exemption 5/23/2013

This letter is to formally request a Petition for Exemption" to combine the drug programs which Summit Aviation currently has into one program. We currently operate separate FAA DOT drug programs, required for the following purposes:

• Part 135 operation and 135 maintenance (CONN094C) • FAA Letter ofAuthorization (LOA) to allow scenic flights I am requesting these programs be combined into one program to improve the efficiency and accuracy ofthe drug programs. By combining the programs there is less chance oferrorwith combined records, this will in additionally improve the efficiency ofthe DOT/FAA audit ofour program. Granting this exemption will not affect public safety as itwill not alter the required drugtesting for either purpose (Part 135 or the LOA). 

# Dtl:

Summit Aviation LLC- Owner 2440 SW Aviation Street Bentonville, AR 72712 davepowell@iflysummit.com

# ~ Cessna Pilot Center Bentonville 

# "Meeting the Needs of General Aviation in NWArkansas" BentonvilleAirport 

## (KVBT) -2440 SWAviation St, Bentonville, AR 72712 479-254-0817 Flight School -479-273-3590 •Service Center- 479-464-0987 SpringdaleAirport 

## (KASG)- 802Airport Rd, Springdale, AR 72764 479-751-4462 Flight School- 479-725-0642



## www.IFLYsummit.com

# ~ Cessna Service Center

BentonvJlle
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 157 

To allow seniors to file their Federal income tax on a new Form 1040SR. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 17, 2017 

Mr. RUBIO (for himself, Mr. NELSON, and Mr. LEE) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To allow seniors to file their Federal income tax on a new 

Form 1040SR. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Seniors’ Tax Sim5 plification Act of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. FORM 1040SR FOR SENIORS. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—The Secretary of the Treasury (or 

8 the Secretary’s delegate) shall make available a form, to 

9 be known as ‘‘Form 1040SR’’, for use by individuals to 

10 file the return of tax imposed by chapter 1 of the Internal 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 157 IS

1 Revenue Code of 1986. Such form shall be as similar as 

2 practicable to Form 1040EZ, except that— 

3 (1) the form shall be available to individuals 

4 who have attained age 65 as of the close of the tax5 able year, 

6 (2) the form may be used even if income for the 

7 taxable year includes— 

8 (A) social security benefits (as defined in 

9 section 86(d) of the Internal Revenue Code of 

10 1986), 

11 (B) distributions from qualified retirement 

12 plans (as defined in section 4974(c) of such 

13 Code), annuities or other such deferred pay14 ment arrangements, 

15 (C) interest and dividends, or 

16 (D) capital gains and losses taken into ac17 count in determining adjusted net capital gain 

18 (as defined in section 1(h)(3) of such Code), 

19 and 

20 (3) the form shall be available without regard 

21 to the amount of any item of taxable income or the 

22 total amount of taxable income for the taxable year. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 157 IS

1 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The form required by sub2 section (a) shall be made available for taxable years begin3 ning after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
# C_2018072EN.01003601.xml

| 26.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 72/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 72/36

---

Judgment of the General Court of 18 January 2018 — LG Electronics v EUIPO (Dual Edge)

(Case T-804/16) (1)

1

((European Union trade mark - Application for EU word mark Dual Edge - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU 2017/1001)))

(2018/C 072/46)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: LG Electronics, Inc. (Seoul, South Korea) (represented by: M. Graf, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Rajh, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 September 2016 (Case R 832/2016-2) concerning an application for registration of the word sign Dual Edge as a European Union trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders LG Electronics, Inc. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders LG Electronics, Inc. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 22, 23.1.2017.

1

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

December 28, 2011 

d1219 

Order 

 

December 28, 2011 

143757 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 143757 

 COA: 304830 

Washtenaw CC: 97-008727-FH 

WILLIE JAMES McGRAW, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 30, 2011 

order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
(Reap. Dec. 10337)

Entry Nos. N-906; N-902.

#### J. C. Penney Purchasing Corp. *v.*United States

(Decided September 20, 1962)

*Sharretts, Paley & Carter*for the plaintiff.

*Joseph D. Guilfoyle,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

*392Wilson, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the parties hereto that the merchandise covered by the above named appeals for reappraisement consists of wool wearing apparel exported from Italy during 1961.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the price, at the time of exportation to the United States of the merchandise undergoing appraisement, at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold or, in the absence of sales, offered for sale in the principal markets of the country of exportation, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other expenses incidental to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, was the appraised unit invoice value less the addition for packing which was already included in said invoice unit values.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that these appeals for reap-praisement be submitted on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find and bold export value, as that value is defined in section 402a (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise herein involved and that such value in each case is the appraised unit invoice value, less the addition for packing which was included in said invoice unit values.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
Case 2:05-cv-03000-AB Document 57 Filed 09/19/06 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:05-cv-03000-AB Document 57 Filed 09/19/06 Page 2 of 2
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**Certification**

 

I, Bonnie M. Klein, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of BCSB Bancorp, Inc.; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly presentin all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: 

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and Ihave disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses inthe design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: August 12, 2005
Case 2:05-cv-00612-HB Document 307 Filed 07/08/11 Page 1 of 5Case 2:05-cv-00612-HB Document 307 Filed 07/08/11 Page 2 of 5Case 2:05-cv-00612-HB Document 307 Filed 07/08/11 Page 3 of 5Case 2:05-cv-00612-HB Document 307 Filed 07/08/11 Page 4 of 5Case 2:05-cv-00612-HB Document 307 Filed 07/08/11 Page 5 of 5
| USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS   |
|------------------------------------|
| Scientific Investigations Map 2823 |

|                                                                                                                                     |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   About USGS /  Science Topics /  Maps, Products & Publications /  Education / FAQ |
|                                                                                                                                     |

## Surficial Geologic Map of the Southwest Memphis Quadrangle, Shelby County, Tennessee,  and Crittenden County, Arkansas

#### By David W. Moore and Sharon F. Diehl

| **Version 1.0**
Posted April 2004
Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format. The latest              version of Adobe Acrobat Reader or similar software is required              to view it. If you wish to download the latest version of Acrobat              Reader free of charge, click here. |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----

| - **SIM** PDF file (2.45 MB) | **For viewing and printing.** |
|------------------------------|-------------------------------|

| Text Only Version*(This PDF version of the report is accessible as defined in Section 508.)* |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| **Metadata** |
|--------------|

| - Downloads  Directory | **Geospatial database is available for download in two optional formats of compression.** |
|------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices                                                                                                                                                           |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey      URL: https://pubsdata.usgs.gov/pubs/sim/2004/2823/Questions or Assistance: USGS Web ContactPage Last Modified: Thr Dec  1 17:03 EDT 2016 |  |

----
No. P68/242.

protest 67/53829 (New York).

#### Ross Products, Inc. *v.*United States,

*1043Ford, J.

In accordance with, stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of batteries, classified as entireties with flashlights, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Torch Mfg. Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(57 Cust. Ct. 521, C.D. 2863), wherein said batteries were held to be separately dutiable and that no separate value for each of said items had been returned by the appraiser, the protest was dismissed and the matter remanded to a single judge to determine the separate value of the flashlights and batteries in the manner provided by law. (28 U.S.C. § 2636(d).)
Line

No.

USSGL

Acct. USSGL Account Title Begin/End Fed/NonFed

Reporting Type 

Code Recip. Cat. Addl. Info.

41

41.1

41.2

41.3

42

42.1

42.2

42.3

43

44

2. FASAB recognizes amounts returned to Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands as non-federal custodial liabilities as referenced in SFFAS No. 7, paragraph 289.

8. Report only General Fund activity associated with this account. General Fund has an Agency Identifier of 099, an FR Entity code of 9900, and a fed/non-fed attribute domain value of G.

9. The transactions and balances between Funds from Dedicated Collections are eliminated to reflect the consolidated Funds from Dedicated Collections column, but balances and transactions between Funds from 

Dedicated Collections and Funds from Other than Dedicated Collections are not eliminated.

Part 1 Fiscal Year 2022 Reporting

USSGL Crosswalk - Reclassified Balance Sheet

Total liabilities and net position

This line is calculated. Equals sum of lines 39 and 43.

Total Unexpended Appropriations - Eliminations Between Dedicated and All Other

Any eliminations between funds needed to reflect Net Position

Total Cumulative Results of Operations (Combined or Consolidated)

Cumulative results of operations - Funds from Dedicated Collections (Note 21)

Cumulative results of operations - Funds from other than Dedicated Collections

Total Cumulative Results of Operations - Eliminations Between Dedicated and All Other

Net position:

Total Unexpended Appropriation (Combined or Consolidated)

Unexpended appropriations - Funds from Dedicated Collections (Note 21)

Unexpended appropriations - Funds from other than Dedicated Collections

Any eliminations between funds needed to reflect Net Position

Total net position

This line is calculated. Equals sum of lines 41 and 42.

1. For Reciprocal Category (RC) detail information, see TFM Volume I, Part 2, Chapter 4700, Federal Entity Reporting Requirements for the Financial Report of the United States Government, Appendix 3.

3. Does not include derivative assets.

4. Related to investments in derivative assets.

5. Includes non-derivative liabilities.

6. Related to derivative liabilities.

7. Exclude General Fund (Trading Partner code 9900) activity in this account.

Footnotes and Additional Information
M

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

May 29, 2015

No. 04-14-00785-CV

Mary Ann CASTRO,

Appellant

v.

Manuel CASTRO,

Appellee

From the 45th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011-CI-15957

Honorable Janet P. Littlejohn, Judge Presiding

ORDER

On May 21, 2015, appellant filed a motion asking this court to deny the motion to 

withdraw filed by appellee’s counsel. This court granted the motion the motion to withdraw on 

May 20, 2015, before appellant filed her motion. Accordingly, we DENY AS MOOT

appellant’s motion to deny counsel’s request to withdraw. Then, on May 27, 2015, appellant 

filed two additional motions – a motion to disqualify appellee’s counsel, seemingly contrary to 

her May 21, 2015 motion asking us to deny the motion to withdraw, and a motion “to void” the 

extension of time this court granted with regard to the filing of appellee’s brief, which was 

granted based on the withdrawal of appellee’s counsel. We have reviewed the May 27, 2015 

motions and DENY them as well.

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 29th day of May, 2015.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
No. 50377.

#### Protests 60062-K, etc., of Mechanical Felt & Textiles Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83, decided February 5, 1945.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries. The protests were sustained to this extent.
No. 64793.

#### Miya Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 60/3691, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of Shoji panels similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United Enterprises et al.*v. *United States*(41 Cust. Ct. 73, C.D. 2023), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
**PROPOSED DELETION OF CURRENT USSGL ACCOUNTS 2021**

**Account Title:**Funds Not Available for Commitment/Obligation 

**Account Number:**463000 

**Normal Balance:**Credit 

**Definition:**Appropriated funds not available for commitment/obligation.

**Justification**: There is no need to have this USSGL account.  

	 IRC Handout April 23, 2020