alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1 NO. 03-14-00669- CR

EX PARTE § IN THE THIRD § § DISTRICT COURT OF §

JUSTIN CARTER § APPEALS OF TEXAS

APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL FOR THE STATE

TO THE HONORABLE JUSTICES OF SAID COURT :

COMES NOW THE STATE OF TEXAS

, by and through its Assistant

Criminal District Attorney, and files this appearance of counsel in the abovecaptioned cause. T he undersigned counsel hereby appears and respectfully requests

that this Honorable Court forward any further notices and correspondence to his

county email address.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Joshua D. Presley Joshua D. Presley

SBN: 24088254 preslj@co.comal.tx.us Comal Criminal District Attorney’s Office 150 N. Seguin Avenue, Suite 307 New Braunfels, Texas 78130 Ph: (830) 221-1300 / Fax: (830) 608-2008 ACCEPTED
03-14-00669-CR

11045916
THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS
6/8/2016 3:38:14 PM
JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, J oshua D. Presley

, Assistant Criminal D istrict A ttorney for the State of

Texas, Appellee, hereby certify that a true and correct copy of this Appearance of

Counsel for the State has been delivered to Appellant J USTIN CARTER ’s attorney

of record in this matter:

Chad P. Van Brunt

vanbruntlaw@live.com 210 S. St. Mary’s Street

Suite 1840

– Tower Life Bldg. San Antonio, TX 78205 Counsel for Appellant on Appeal

By electronic service to the above

- l isted email address through efile.txcourts.gov

on this the 8 th day of June , 201 6

.

/s/ J oshua D. Presley

J oshua D. Presley
March 28, 1955

No. 58905.

Suit 4808.

#### Atalanta Trading Corp. *v.*United States.

C. D. 1574 affirmed December 21, 1954. C. A. D. 577.
# C_2017078EN.01001301.xml

| 13.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 78/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 78/13

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (Belgium) lodged on 29 December 2016 — Inter-Environnement Bruxelles ASBL, Groupe d’Animation du Quartier Européen de la Ville de Bruxelles ASBL, Association du Quartier Léopold ASBL, Brusselse Raad voor het Leefmilieu ASBL, Pierre Picard, David Weytsman v Région de Bruxelles-Capitale

(Case C-671/16)

(2017/C 078/18)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Conseil d’État

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Inter-Environnement Bruxelles ASBL, Groupe d’Animation du Quartier Européen de la Ville de Bruxelles ASBL, Association du Quartier Léopold ASBL, Brusselse Raad voor het Leefmilieu ASBL, Pierre Picard, David Weytsman

Applicants:

Defendant: Région de Bruxelles-Capitale

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Must Article 2(a) of Directive 2001/42/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 June 2001 on the assessment of the effects of certain plans and programmes on the environment (1) be interpreted as including in the concept of ‘plans and programmes’ town planning regulations adopted by a regional authority:

1

| — | which contain a map setting out the area to which they apply, limited to a single district, and defining various islands within that area to which different rules apply as regards the location and height of buildings; and |
| --- | --- |

—

which contain a map setting out the area to which they apply, limited to a single district, and defining various islands within that area to which different rules apply as regards the location and height of buildings; and

| — | which also lay down specific planning provisions for areas situated in the areas around buildings, and precise indications on the spatial application of certain rules which they lay down taking into consideration the streets, straight lines traced perpendicular to those streets and distances in relation to the alignment of those streets; and |
| --- | --- |

—

which also lay down specific planning provisions for areas situated in the areas around buildings, and precise indications on the spatial application of certain rules which they lay down taking into consideration the streets, straight lines traced perpendicular to those streets and distances in relation to the alignment of those streets; and

| — | which pursue the objective of transforming the district concerned; and |
| --- | --- |

—

which pursue the objective of transforming the district concerned; and

| — | which lay down the rules regarding the composition of the files of applications for planning permission subject to an environmental impact assessment in that district? |
| --- | --- |

—

which lay down the rules regarding the composition of the files of applications for planning permission subject to an environmental impact assessment in that district?

---

(1)  OJ 2001 L 197, p. 30.

1

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

   PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

The undersigned executive officer of First BancTrust Corporation (the
"Registrant") hereby certifies that the Registrant's Form 10-K for the year
ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained therein
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Registrant.


                                        /s/ Ellen M. Litteral
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Name: Ellen M. Litteral
                                        Title: Chief Financial Officer and
                                               Treasurer

Date: March 27, 2007


                                       51
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1217 

To amend the National Labor Relations Act to provide for appropriate 

designation of collective bargaining units. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 24, 2017 

Mr. ISAKSON (for himself, Mr. ALEXANDER, Mr. CORKER, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. 

HATCH, Mr. MCCONNELL, Mr. PERDUE, Mr. RISCH, Mr. ROBERTS, Mr. 

SCOTT, Mr. WICKER, and Mr. BOOZMAN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the National Labor Relations Act to provide for 

appropriate designation of collective bargaining units. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Representation Fair5 ness Restoration Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AMENDMENT TO THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS 

7 ACT. 

8 Section 9(b) of the National Labor Relations Act (29 

9 U.S.C. 159(b)) is amended to read as follows: 


SSpencer on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1217 IS

1 ‘‘(b) In each case, prior to an election, the Board 

2 shall determine, in order to ensure to employees the fullest 

3 freedom in exercising the rights guaranteed by this Act, 

4 the unit appropriate for the purposes of collective bar5 gaining. Unless otherwise stated in this Act, excluding 

6 acute health care facilities, the unit appropriate for pur7 poses of collective bargaining shall consist of employees 

8 that share a sufficient community of interest. In deter9 mining whether employees share a sufficient community 

10 of interest, the Board shall consider (1) similarity of 

11 wages, benefits, and working conditions; (2) similarity of 

12 skills and training; (3) centrality of management and com13 mon supervision; (4) extent of interchange and frequency 

14 of contact between employees; (5) integration of the work 

15 flow and interrelationship of the production process; (6) 

16 the consistency of the unit with the employer’s organiza17 tional structure; (7) similarity of job functions and work; 

18 and (8) the bargaining history in the particular unit and 

19 the industry. To avoid the proliferation or fragmentation 

20 of bargaining units, employees shall not be excluded from 

21 the unit unless the interests of the group sought are suffi22 ciently distinct from those of other employees to warrant 

23 the establishment of a separate unit. Whether additional 

24 employees should be included in a proposed unit shall be 

25 based on whether such additional employees and proposed 


SSpencer on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1217 IS

1 unit members share a sufficient community of interest, 

2 with the exception of proposed accretions to an existing 

3 unit, in which the inclusion of additional employees shall 

4 be based on whether such additional employees and exist5 ing unit members share an overwhelming community of 

6 interest and the additional employees have little or no sep7 arate identity.’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
1

Ogulei, David

From: Morgan, Andrea

Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2014 9:42 AM

To: kathyandria@gmail.com; klogansmith@moenviron.org; ejhubertz@wulaw.wustl.edu; 

amyfunk@illinois.edu; kmiller@wulaw.wustl.edu; david.klarich@veoliaes.com; 

Dennis.warchol@VeoliaES.com; Doug.harris@veoliaes.com

Cc: Ogulei, David; Damico, Genevieve; Woolums, Jane

Subject: Air Permitting Actions Webpage for Veolia ES Technical Solutions

Everyone, 

Based off of the feedback that EPA received on the development of a public participation plan for Veolia ES Technical 

Solutions LLC., EPA created a webpage for the upcoming permitting action. Currently, the renewal application and the 

comprehensive performance tests reports are available for download from the webpage. This website will be updated 

when EPA makes its decision available for public comment. The link to the page is below. Feel free to share this link 

with other parties you think may be interested. 

http://www.epa.gov/region5/air/veoliasauget/index.html

Thanks, 

Andrea Morgan 

Andrea Morgan 

Environmental Engineer 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

Region 5 | Air & Radiation Division 

Phone: (312) 353-6058 | Fax: (312) 692-2920
Exhibit 31.2
**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**
I, Francis Raborn, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of United DefenseIndustries, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and
c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: August 2, 2004               /s/ Francis Raborn   Title: Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 20-0481

C. EDWARD BUMGARNER,

 Plaintiff and Appellant,

 v.

CITY OF CHOTEAU BOA,

 Defendant and Appellee.

ORDER OF MEDIATOR APPOINTMENT

All mediators previously appointed in this matter, has notified the Court that they

are unable to fulfil this appointment. Accordingly, all previous orders of mediator 

appointment are hereby rescinded and

IT IS ORDERED THAT Stuart L. Kellner, whose name appears next on the list

of attorneys desiring appointment as mediators for Money Judgments appeals which is 

maintained pursuant to M.R.App.P., 7(4)(e), is hereby appointed to conduct the 

mediation process required by M.R.App.P., 7(5), and 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the time periods set forth in M.R.App.P., 

7(5)(d) shall run from the date of this order of appointment.

A true copy of this order is being mailed to counsel of record for the parties, or to 

the parties individually if not represented by counsel, on the date hereof.

DATED this December 1, 2020.

Bowen Greenwood, Clerk of the Supreme Court

c: C. Edward Bumgarner, Jeffrey M. Hindoien, Stuart L. Kellner

,...6..-f

12/01/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0481
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JEROLD WASHINGTON : CIVIL ACTION

:

 v. :

:

NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER : NO. 02-4451

CORP.

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 24th day of April, 2003, it is Ordered

that a conference on plaintiff’s motion to compel will be held on

May 7, 2003 at 11:00 a.m. in chambers.

ATTEST: or BY THE COURT

BY: Michael Owens 

 Deputy Clerk CLIFFORD SCOTT GREEN, Sr. J.

Civ 12 (9/83)

Case 2:02-cv-04451-CG Document 15 Filed 04/25/2003 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>
             INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM'S CONSENT




The Board of Directors
First BancTrust Corporation


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
First BancTrust Corporation on Form S-8 (Registration Statement Nos. 333-91466
and 333-114943) of our report dated February 4, 2005 on our audit of the
consolidated financial statements of First BancTrust Corporation as of December
31, 2004 and 2003 and for the years then ended, which report is included in this
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB.


/s/ BKD, LLP
Decatur, IL
March 23, 2005
# sec4_attribtable_2023

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2022-XX	&"Arial,Bold"&9DRAFT	&"Arial,Bold"&10April 2022 IRC Meeting Handout
Management Assertion

As of and for the year ended December 31, 2000, First Union National Bank (the Bank) has complied in all material respects with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's (MBA's) *Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers,*except for minimum servicing standards V.4. and VI. I., which the MBA has interpreted as being inapplicable to the servicing of commercial and multifamily loans. As of and for this same period, the Bank had in effect a fidelity bond and errors and omissions policy in the amount of $200 million and $20 million,

Respectively.

			

John M. Church		

Managing Director/Senior Vice President

First Union National Bank

Date:   February 9, 2001

			

Timothy S. Ryan 	

Director/Vice President

First Union National Bank

Date:  February 9, 2001
Before the Third Division,

September 12, 1951

No. 55873.

protests 160325-K, etc. (New York).

#### Paolo Alonge, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

*315Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 58473.

protests 211069-K, etc. (New York).

#### Paramount Import & Export Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

It was stipulated that the. merchandise and issues are the same in all material respects as those the subject of *John P. Berber & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(30 Cust. Ct. 193, C. D. 1519). In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the cited case, the protests were dismissed, and the matters were remanded to a single judge sitting in reappraisement for determination of the value of the merchandise in the manner provided by law (28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d)).
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001051828
<NAME>                        MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING IV, L.P.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-29-2000
<CASH>                                               1
<SECURITIES>                                   485,268
<RECEIVABLES>                                    8,549
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               493,818
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 493,818
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,549
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    412,372
<COMMON>                                        72,897
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   493,818
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                25,854
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 25,854
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             25,854
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    25,854
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
Exhibit
32.1





Statement
of Chief Executive Officer Furnished


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





The undersigned, Kim S. Price, is the
President and Chief Executive Officer of Citizens South Banking Corporation (the
“Company”).





This statement is being furnished in
connection with the filing by the Company of the Company’s Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 (the “Report”).





By execution of this statement, I
certify that to the best of my knowledge:





A)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d))
      and





B)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      as of the dates and for the periods covered by the
  Report.





November 12, 2009
            
            /s/ Kim S. PriceDated
            
            Kim
      S. PricePresident
      and Chief Executive Officer





This
statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this
statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  It is not intended that this
statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
to Citizens South Banking Corporation and will be retained
by Citizens South Banking Corporation and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case 2:04-cv-03234-GEKP Document 5 Filed 08/19/04 Page 1 of 12
Case 2:04-cv-03234-GEKP Document 5 Filed 08/19/04 Page 2 of 12
Case 2:04-cv-03234-GEKP Document 5 Filed 08/19/04 Page 3 of 12
Case 2:04-cv-03234-GEKP Document 5 Filed 08/19/04 Page 4 of 12
Case 2:04-cv-03234-GEKP Document 5 Filed 08/19/04 Page 5 of 12
Case 2:04-cv-03234-GEKP Document 5 Filed 08/19/04 Page 6 of 12
Case 2:04-cv-03234-GEKP Document 5 Filed 08/19/04 Page 7 of 12
Case 2:04-cv-03234-GEKP Document 5 Filed 08/19/04 Page 8 of 12
Case 2:04-cv-03234-GEKP Document 5 Filed 08/19/04 Page 9 of 12
Case 2:04-cv-03234-GEKP Document 5 Filed 08/19/04 Page 10 of 12
Case 2:04-cv-03234-GEKP Document 5 Filed 08/19/04 Page 11 of 12
Case 2:04-cv-03234-GEKP Document 5 Filed 08/19/04 Page 12 of 12
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection
with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Belk, Inc. (the "Corporation") for the
quarter ended May 1, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned, the Chairman of the Board
and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation, certifies that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation.

/s/ Thomas M. Belk, Jr.
---------------------------
Thomas M. Belk, Jr.
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
June 10, 2004
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Merrill Lynch Preferred
Capital Trust III (the "Trust") and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding III, L.P.
for the period ended September 28, 2007 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Marlene Debel,
Regular Trustee of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.





                              MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST III


                              By:  /s/ MARLENE DEBEL
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                              Name:    Marlene Debel *
                              Title:   Regular Trustee









Dated:  November 9, 2007
______________________

* Marlene Debel functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
  and Chief  Financial  Officer of the Trust for  purposes  of Section  906
  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.