alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### 2 Attachments

Hi all,

Consistent with our EO, attached are the handouts f rom the 12866 meeting this morning.

Regards,

Cortney

When: Thursday, March 17, 2011 10:00 AM-10:30 AM (U TC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada).

Where: 9104 NEOB

Note: The GMT offset above does not reflect dayligh t saving time adjustments.

*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*

Robert Nolan, ExxonMobil has requested this meeting

.

Call-in number: 202-395-6392; code 9325179



### FW: E.O. 12866 Meeting on NESHAP: Marine Tank Vesse l Leading Operations, Printing and Publishing; Production and Group I Polymers and Resins Higgins, Cortney

to: Ann Johnson, Ken Hustvedt, Nick Parsons

03/17/2011 02:52 PM

Show Details

History: This message has been forwarded.

Mar17_2011_RTR_Group1_Handout1.pdf Mar17_2011_RTR_Group1_Handout2.pdf 

### Page 1 of 1

3/31/2011 file://C:\Documents and Settings\nparsons\Local Set tings\Temp\notesFCBCEE\~web3340.

...
# sec4_attribtable_2024

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2022-XX	&"Arial,Bold"&9DRAFT	&"Arial,Bold"&10April 2022 IRC Meeting Handout
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

KRISTIN C. PEREZ HAINES

v.

RODNEY GENE LEE, et al.

: CIVIL ACTION 

:

: NO. 02-CV-4432

:

:

:

ORDER

AND NOW, this day of July, 2003, counsel for Plaintiff having reported that the

issues in the above-captioned action have been settled, and pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1(b)

of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court (effective July 1, 1995), IT IS ORDERED that the

above-captioned action is DISMISSED with prejudice, pursuant to agreement of counsel and without

costs.

BY THE COURT:

 

BRUCE W. KAUFFMAN, J.

Case 2:02-cv-04432-BWK Document 28 Filed 07/15/2003 Page 1 of 1
Case No. 15,007.

#### UNITED STATES v. DUNN et al.

[1 Cranch, C. C. 165.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

June Term, 1804.

Riot—Evidence of Intent—Witness.

1

 [Reported by Hon. William Cranch, Chief Judge.]

Indictment for a riot. The witnesses for defendants were not allowed by the court to give evidence of their intention in meeting, they having testified that they were of the party concerned in the riot.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001051830
<NAME>                        MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST IV
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   OTHER
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-29-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                   412,372
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,340
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               419,712
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 419,712
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,340
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    400,000
<COMMON>                                        12,372
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   419,712
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,020
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 22,020
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             22,020
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    22,020
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0



</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Michael Walsh, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of IQ Biometrix, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: February 17, 2004

                                              /s/ Michael Walsh
                                              ---------------------------
                                              Michael Walsh
                                              Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit
23.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC
ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference
    in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 (No. 333-87973), and Form S-3
    (No. 333-116144 and No. 333-131489) of our reports dated February 7, 2006
    on our audits of the financial statements and financial statement schedule
    as of December 31, 2005 and 2004 and for each of the years in the three year
    period ended December 31, 2005, and of management's assessment of the effectiveness
    of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal
    control over financial reporting of I.D. Systems, Inc. as of December 31,
    2005, which are included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
    December 31, 2005.

We also consent to the reference to our firm
    under the caption "Experts" in the Form S-3 (No. 333-131489).

/s/ Eisner LLP

|New York, New YorkFebruary 17, 2006
|-----------------------------------



---
# C_2018072EN.01003301.xml

| 26.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 72/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 72/33

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 January 2018 — Sun Media v EUIPO — Meta4 Spain (METABOX)

(Case T-204/16) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark METABOX - Earlier EU and national word marks META4 and earlier EU and national figurative marks meta4 - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Similarity of the signs - Likelihood of confusion))

(2018/C 072/42)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Sun Media Ltd (Hong Kong, China) (represented by: A. Schnider, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: S. Bonne, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Meta4 Spain, SA (Las Rozas, Spain) (represented by: I. Temiño Ceniceros, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 3 March 2016 (Case R 307/2015-2) relating to opposition proceedings between Meta4 Spain and Sun Media.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Sun Media Ltd to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Sun Media Ltd to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 270, 25.7.2016.

1

---
No. 51335.

#### Protests 952546-G, etc., of S. S. Kresge Co. et al. (Baltimore, etc.)

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1387 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1387

    To require the Secretary of Defense to implement processes and 
 procedures to provide expedited evaluation and treatment for prenatal 
                   surgery under the TRICARE program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 21, 2017

  Mr. Rounds (for himself, Mr. Casey, and Mr. Booker) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                             Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To require the Secretary of Defense to implement processes and 
 procedures to provide expedited evaluation and treatment for prenatal 
                   surgery under the TRICARE program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``TRICARE Expedited Evaluation and 
Treatment for Prenatal Surgery Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. EXPEDITED EVALUATION AND TREATMENT FOR PRENATAL SURGERY UNDER 
              THE TRICARE PROGRAM.

    (a) In General.--The Secretary of Defense shall implement processes 
and procedures to ensure that a covered beneficiary under the TRICARE 
program whose pregnancy is complicated with a fetal anomaly or 
suspected of being complicated with a fetal anomaly receives, in an 
expedited manner and at the discretion of the covered beneficiary, 
evaluation and treatment from a perinatal or pediatric specialist 
capable of providing surgical management and intervention in utero.
    (b) Definitions.--In this section, the terms ``covered 
beneficiary'' and ``TRICARE program'' have the meanings given those 
terms in section 1072 of title 10, United States Code.
                                 <all>
```
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SAMUEL WOLDESEMAIT,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 09-71434

Agency No. A029-234-362

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 8, 2011** 

Before: FARRIS, LEAVY, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Samuel Woldesemait, a native and citizen of Ethiopia, petitions for review

of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen

based on ineffective assistance of counsel. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. 

FILED

MAR 24 2011

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 09-71434

§ 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen,

Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir. 2003), and we deny the petition for

review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion by denying Woldesemait’s motion to

reopen because the motion was filed more than 15 years after the BIA’s February

7, 1994, order dismissing the underlying appeal, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and

Woldesemait failed to demonstrate that he acted with the due diligence required to

warrant equitable tolling of the filing deadline, see Iturribarria, 321 F.3d at 897.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
United States Department of Agriculture
United States Department of Agriculture
United States Department of Agriculture
United States Department of Agriculture
United States Department of Agriculture
United States Department of Agriculture
United States Department of Agriculture
United States Department of Agriculture
United States Department of Agriculture
United States Department of Agriculture
United States Department of Agriculture
United States Department of Agriculture
United States Department of Agriculture
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Labor

###### Mine Safety and Health Administration

# AGENCY:

Mine Safety and Health Administration, Labor.

# ACTION:

Notice; correction.

# SUMMARY:

                        This notice amends a petition for modification published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on October 19, 2023, for Peabody Midwest Mining, LLC, CR 725 East, Francisco, Indiana 47699.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        S. Aromie Noe, Office of Standards, Regulations, and Variances at 202-693-9440 (voice),                         *Petitionsformodification@dol.gov*                         (email), or 202-693-9441 (fax). [These are not toll-free numbers.]                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Correction

                    This notice corrects the docket number cited in the notice. Docket Number M-2023-021-C is incorrectly referenced in the                     **Federal Register**                    , 88 FR 72106, October 19, 2023, first column. The correct Docket Number is M-2023-024-C.                

Song-ae Aromie Noe,

Director, Office of Standards, Regulations, and Variances.

[FR Doc. 2023-24835 Filed 11-8-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
No. 47803.

#### Protests 76485-K, etc., of Wah Shang Co. et al. (San Francisco).

Opinion- by

Cole, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *Wing Duck Co.*v. *United States*(6 Cust. Ct. 133, C. D. 446) the protests were sustained.
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 99.2
------------


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Championship Auto Racing Teams, Inc.
(the "Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Thomas L. Carter, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Thomas L. Carter

Thomas L. Carter
Chief Financial Officer
November 14, 2002


                                       33
# C_2019082EN.01004101.xml

| 4.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/41

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 December 2018 — Ryanair and Airport Marketing Services v Commission

(Case T-165/16) (1)

((State aid - Agreements concluded with the airline Ryanair and its subsidiary Airport Marketing Services - Airport services - Marketing services - Decision declaring the aid to be incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery - Notion of State aid - Advantage - Private investor test - Recovery - Article 41 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Access to the file - Right to be heard))

(2019/C 82/46)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Ryanair DAC, formerly Ryanair Ltd (Dublin, Ireland), Airport Marketing Services Ltd (Dublin) (represented by: G. Berrisch, E. Vahida, I.-G. Metaxas-Maranghidis, lawyers, and B. Byrne, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn, L. Armati, and S. Noë, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: S. Boelaert and S. Petrova, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action under Article 263 TFEU for the partial annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2016/287 of 15 October 2014 on State aid SA.26500 — 2012/C (ex 2011/NN, ex CP 227/2008) implemented by Germany for Flugplatz Altenburg-Nobitz GmbH and Ryanair Ltd (OJ 2016 L 59, p. 22).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Ryanair DAC and Airport Marketing Services Ltd to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Ryanair DAC and Airport Marketing Services Ltd to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;

| 3. | Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Council of the European Union to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 222, 20.6.2016.

---
Exhibit 32.1


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Merrill Lynch Preferred
Capital Trust III (the "Trust") and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding III, L.P.
for the period ended June 25, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Haig J. Nargesian,
Regular Trustee of the Trust, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Trust.





                              MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST III


                              By:  /s/ HAIG J. NARGESIAN
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                              Name:    Haig J. Nargesian *
                              Title:   Regular Trustee









Dated: August 4, 2004
_____________________

* Haig J. Nargesian functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
  and Chief  Financial  Officer of the Trust for  purposes  of Section  906
  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
**Part 2Fiscal Year 2015 Reporting**

**SupplementSection II**

**PROPOSED NEW USSGL ACCOUNTS FOR FISCAL 2015**

**Account Title:** Funds Not Available – Adjustments to the Exchange Stabilization Fund

**Account Number**: 463500

**Normal Balance:** Credit

**Definition:**  Funds not available for commitment/obligations. The amount of increase or decrease in the Exchange Stabilization Fund as a result of revaluation, foreign exchange rate adjustments, and special liabilities (general allocations and special drawing rights certificates).  Although the normal balance in this account is a credit, it is acceptable in certain instances for this account to have a debit balance when a loss is recognized.  This USSGL account is to be used only by the Department of the Treasury.  This account does not close at year-end. 

***Justification:  This account was created as it does not close where 463000 does close.***

**Account Title:**  Authority Transfer Control In

***Justification:  The General Fund has a need for an account similar to USSGL Account 577600 “Nonbudgetary Financing Sources Transferred Out,” but with a Domain Value of “Blank” for the Fed/Non-Fed attribute. They need this account to properly account for transfers between agencies without causing elimination issues. The General Fund is not a direct trading partner in these transactions and only uses the transfer account as a means to track the change. These accounts would be effective FY2015 and on May’s Ballot.***

.

***Justification:  The General Fund has a need for an account similar to USSGL Account 577600 “Nonbudgetary Financing Sources Transferred Out,” but with a Domain Value of “Blank” for the Fed/Non-Fed attribute. They need this account to properly account for transfers between agencies without causing elimination issues. The General Fund is not a direct trading partner in these transactions and only uses the transfer account as a means to track the change. These accounts would be effective FY2015 and on May’s Ballot.***

**PROPOSED CHANGES TO CURRENT USSGL ACCOUNTS FOR FISCAL 2015**

***Justification:  To update the account definition to clarify the use of this account being restricted to the Department of Transportation and agencies who receive allocation transfers from the Department of Transportation.***

**T/L S2 14-01 II  - 1IRC Handout April 22, 2014**