alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2019164EN.01004301.xml

| 13.5.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 164/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.5.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 164/43

---

Judgment of the General Court of 20 March 2019 — Hércules Club de Fútbol v Commission

(Case T-766/16) (1)

(State aid - Aid granted by Spain to certain professional football clubs - Guarantee - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market - Advantage - Obligation to state reasons)

(2019/C 164/44)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Applicant: Hércules Club de Fútbol, SAD (Alicante, Spain) (represented by: S. Rating and Y. Martínez Mata, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Luengo, B. Stromsky and P. Němečková, Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: initially A. Gavela Llopis and M.J. García-Valdecasas Dorrego, subsequently by M.J. García-Valdecasas Dorrego, Agents)

Re:

Action under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2017/365 of 4 July 2016 on the State aid SA.36387 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN) (ex 2013/CP) implemented by Spain for Valencia Club de Fútbol, SAD, Hércules Club de Fútbol, SAD and Elche Club de Fútbol, SAD (OJ 2017 L 55, p. 12).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Commission Decision (EU) 2017/365 of 4 July 2016 on the State aid SA.36387 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN) (ex 2013/CP) implemented by Spain for Valencia Club de Fútbol, SAD, Hércules Club de Fútbol, SAD and Elche Club de Fútbol, SAD, in so far as it concerns Hércules Club de Fútbol, SAD; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Commission Decision (EU) 2017/365 of 4 July 2016 on the State aid SA.36387 (2013/C) (ex 2013/NN) (ex 2013/CP) implemented by Spain for Valencia Club de Fútbol, SAD, Hércules Club de Fútbol, SAD and Elche Club de Fútbol, SAD, in so far as it concerns Hércules Club de Fútbol, SAD;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Hércules Club de Fútbol; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Hércules Club de Fútbol;

| 3. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 6, 9.1.2017.

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 03-7061

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus AARON WILLIAM DANGERFIELD, a/k/a Dusty, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (CR-02-32-A, CA-03-549-AM) Submitted: November 19, 2003 Decided: December 4, 2003 Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Aaron William Dangerfield, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Edward Rich, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Aaron William Dangerfield seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000), and denying his motion for reconsideration. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Dangerfield has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny his motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
No. 51348.

#### Protest 47359-K of Morris Friedman (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83.) In. accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the *194Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on the entry. The protest was sustained to this extent.
Case No. 14,409.

#### UNITED NICKEL CO. v. MANHATTAN BRASS CO.

[Cited in The Horman Pat. Manuf'g Co. v. Brooklyn City U. Co.. Case No. 3,700. Nowhere reported: opinion not now accessible.]
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99-1

                                  CERTIFICATION

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his/her capacity as an officer of
Pocahontas Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company") that the Quarterly Report of the
Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that
the information contained in such report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition of the Company at the end of such period and
the results of operations of the Company for such period.

                                        POCAHONTAS BANCORP, INC.

Date: August 14, 2002                   /s/ Dwayne Powell
      -------------------               ---------------------------------------
                                        Dwayne Powell
                                        President and Chief Executive Officer

Date: August 14, 2002                   /s/ Terry Prichard
      -------------------               ----------------------------------------
                                        Terry Prichard
                                        Senior Vice President and Controller
Case 2:04-cv-04972-EL Document 6 Filed 11/22/2004 Page 1 of 14

PHILADELPHIA 76ERS L.P. v. TRUSTMARK INSURANCE COMPANY et al Doc. 6

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:04-cv-04972-EL Document 6 Filed 11/22/2004 Page 2 of 14
Case 2:04-cv-04972-EL Document 6 Filed 11/22/2004 Page 3 of 14
Case 2:04-cv-04972-EL Document 6 Filed 11/22/2004 Page 4 of 14
Case 2:04-cv-04972-EL Document 6 Filed 11/22/2004 Page 5 of 14
Case 2:04-cv-04972-EL Document 6 Filed 11/22/2004 Page 6 of 14
Case 2:04-cv-04972-EL Document 6 Filed 11/22/2004 Page 7 of 14
Case 2:04-cv-04972-EL Document 6 Filed 11/22/2004 Page 8 of 14
Case 2:04-cv-04972-EL Document 6 Filed 11/22/2004 Page 9 of 14
Case 2:04-cv-04972-EL Document 6 Filed 11/22/2004 Page 10 of 14
Case 2:04-cv-04972-EL Document 6 Filed 11/22/2004 Page 11 of 14
Case 2:04-cv-04972-EL Document 6 Filed 11/22/2004 Page 12 of 14
Case 2:04-cv-04972-EL Document 6 Filed 11/22/2004 Page 13 of 14
Case 2:04-cv-04972-EL Document 6 Filed 11/22/2004 Page 14 of 14
; Generated by FastSum - an extremely fast checksum utility.
; Go to www.fastsum.com to get your own copy for free.
;
6AC80021F1948BB521CA7EFE267F4781 *newsletter01-04.pdf
87D01E27C6BD202826A4277F30AEC2E6 *newsletter02-04.pdf
BB89518438F181B34256D3170C4C93AD *newsletter03-04.pdf
677FF15F57227C71483DB99D631B6F0E *newsletter05-04.pdf
F49B5F4B8BBDAAFF4F5EFA9AE950B404 *newsletter07-04.pdf
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 13.2



                                 CERTIFICATION



           PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(SUBSECTIONS (A) AND (B) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18, UNITED STATES
                                     CODE)



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Allianz Aktiengesellschaft, a German company (the
"Company"), hereby certifies, to such officer's knowledge, that:



The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2002 as amended
by this Amendment No. 1 on Form 20-F/A (the "Amended Report") of the Company
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Amended Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.



Date: November 28 2003



                                          /s/ DR. HELMUT PERLET

                                          --------------------------------------

                                          Dr. Helmut Perlet

                                          Chief Financial Officer
Order entered February 8 , 2021

In The 

### Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05
- 20
- 00947
- CV IN THE INTEREST OF C.T.C., A CHILD On Appeal from the 330th Judicial District Court

Dall as County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DF
- 20
- 05158

ORDER On January 25, 2021, we ordered Francheska Duffey, Official Court Reporter for the 330 th Judicial District Court, to file either the reporter’s record or written verification appellant had not requ ested the record

. Before the Court is Ms. Duffey’s February 4, 2021 written verification the record has not been requested

. Our January 25 th order cautioned appellant the appeal could be submitted without the reporter’s record if the Court was notified t he record had not been requested. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 37.3(c). Accordingly, we ORDER the appeal submitted without the reporter’s record. See id. As the clerk’s record has been filed, we further ORDER appellant to file her bri ef no later than March 10 , 2 021.
/s/ ROBERT D. BURNS, III CHIEF JUSTICE
AVAQMD Rule 461 - Gasoline Transfer And Dispensing 

### B - 

### 3 Final Staff Report, 2/12/09
Case 2:05-cv-00305-JHS   Document 654   Filed 07/25/13   Page 1 of 10

Case 2:05-cv-00305-JHS   Document 654   Filed 07/25/13   Page 2 of 10

Case 2:05-cv-00305-JHS   Document 654   Filed 07/25/13   Page 3 of 10

Case 2:05-cv-00305-JHS   Document 654   Filed 07/25/13   Page 4 of 10

Case 2:05-cv-00305-JHS   Document 654   Filed 07/25/13   Page 5 of 10

Case 2:05-cv-00305-JHS   Document 654   Filed 07/25/13   Page 6 of 10

Case 2:05-cv-00305-JHS   Document 654   Filed 07/25/13   Page 7 of 10

Case 2:05-cv-00305-JHS   Document 654   Filed 07/25/13   Page 8 of 10

Case 2:05-cv-00305-JHS   Document 654   Filed 07/25/13   Page 9 of 10

Case 2:05-cv-00305-JHS   Document 654   Filed 07/25/13   Page 10 of 10
Exhibit 99.03

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of IQ Biometris,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  September 30, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned  certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The  Report fully complies with the  requirements  of  Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material  respects,  the financial condition and results
                  of operations of the Company.

November 19, 2002                        By: /s/ William Scigliano
                                                 William Scigliano
                                                 Chief Executive Officer


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection  with the Quarterly  Report of IQ Biometris,  Inc.  (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended  September 30, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned  certifies,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The  Report fully complies with the  requirements  of  Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material  respects,  the financial condition and results
                  of operations of the Company.

November 19, 2002                        By: /s/ Paul Schroeder
                                             Paul Schroeder
                                             Chief Financial Officer
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 39 Filed 02/26/2007 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 39 Filed 02/26/2007 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 39 Filed 02/26/2007 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 39 Filed 02/26/2007 Page 4 of 4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

U.S.A.EX REL.REGINALD :

R. REAVES ; 

:

:

 V. :

: CIVIL NO. 02-4375

ROBERT D. SHANNON, :

DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE :

COUNTY OF DELAWARE :

:

:

 :

:

:

:

ORDER

AND NOW, this 12th day of August, 2002, it is hereby

ORDERED as follows: 

1. The Motion for Immediate Bail is DENIED. 

2. The Motion for Leave for an Extension of Time to Tender

the filing fee to the Clerk of Court is DENIED.

3. The Motion to Submit as Financial Collateral

Petitioner’s Private Real Estate Deed and Power of Attorney Deed

as Payment and Costs of Court is DENIED. 

4. The above-captioned matter is DISMISSED. 

 

BY THE COURT:

________________________

JAMES t. GILES, C.J.

copies by FAX on

to

Case 2:02-cv-04375-JG Document 5 Filed 08/14/2002 Page 1 of 1
# C_2019148EN.01000201.xml

| 29.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 148/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 148/2

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 7 March 2019 — Balázs-Árpád Izsák, Attila Dabis v European Commission, Hungary, Hellenic Republic, Romania, Slovak Republic

(Case C-420/16 P) (1)

(Appeal - Law governing the institutions - Citizens’ initiative - Regulation (EU) No 211/2011 - Registration of the proposed citizens’ initiative - Article 4(2)(b) - Condition that the proposed initiative does not manifestly fall outside the framework of the European Commission’s powers to submit a proposal for a legal act for the purpose of implementing the Treaties - Burden of proof - Economic, social and territorial cohesion - Article 174 TFEU - Citizens’ initiative ‘Cohesion policy for the equality of the regions and sustainability of the regional cultures’ - Application for registration - Refusal by the Commission)

(2019/C 148/02)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Parties

Appellants: Balázs-Árpád Izsák, Attila Dabis (represented by: D. Sobor, ügyvéd)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: K. Banks, K. Talabér-Ritz, H. Krämer and B.-R. Killmann, acting as Agents), Hungary (represented by: M.Z. Fehér, acting as Agent), Hellenic Republic, Romania (represented by: R.H. Radu, C.R. Canțăr, C.-M. Florescu, L. Lițu and E. Gane, acting as Agents), Slovak Republic (represented by: B. Ricziová, acting as Agent)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 10 May 2016, Iszák and Dabis v Commission (T-529/13, EU:T:2016:282); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 10 May 2016, Iszák and Dabis v Commission (T-529/13, EU:T:2016:282);

| 2. | Annuls Decision C(2013) 4975 final of the Commission of 25 July 2013 concerning the application for registration of the European citizens’ initiative ‘Cohesion policy for the equality of the regions and sustainability of the regional cultures’; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Annuls Decision C(2013) 4975 final of the Commission of 25 July 2013 concerning the application for registration of the European citizens’ initiative ‘Cohesion policy for the equality of the regions and sustainability of the regional cultures’;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs relating to the proceedings at first instance and on appeal; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs relating to the proceedings at first instance and on appeal;

| 4. | Orders Hungary, Romania and the Slovak Republic to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders Hungary, Romania and the Slovak Republic to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 392, 24.10.2016.

---
# Annual Cert Checklist

# image1.jpeg
# C_2018352EN.01003001.xml

| 1.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 352/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.10.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 352/30

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 July 2018 — Banque postale v ECB

(Case T-733/16) (1)

((Economic and monetary policy - Prudential supervision of credit institutions - Article 4(1)(d) and (3) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 - Calculation of the leverage ratio - Refusal of the ECB to grant authorisation to the applicant to exclude exposures meeting certain conditions from the calculation of the leverage ratio - Article 429(14) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 - Discretion of the ECB - Errors of law - Manifest error of assessment))

(2018/C 352/35)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: La Banque postale (Paris, France) (represented by: E. Guillaume and L. Coudray, lawyers)

Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: K. Lackhoff, R. Bax and G. Bassani, acting as Agents, and H.-G. Kamann and F. Louis, lawyers)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Republic of Finland (represented by: S. Hartikainen, acting as Agent)

Re:

Application on the basis of Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of European Central Bank Decision ECB/SSM/2016-96950066U5XAAIRCPA78/16 of 24 August 2016, taken pursuant to Article 4(1)(d) and Article 10 of Council Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 of 15 October 2013 conferring specific tasks on the European Central Bank concerning policies relating to the prudential supervision of credit institutions (OJ 2013 L 287, p. 63), and Article 429(14) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on the prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms and amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 (OJ 2013 L 176, p. 1, corrigenda OJ 2013 L 208, p. 68 and OJ 2013 L 321, p. 6).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls European Central Bank (ECB) Decision ECB/SSM/2016-96950066U5XAAIRCPA78/16 of 24 August 2016; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls European Central Bank (ECB) Decision ECB/SSM/2016-96950066U5XAAIRCPA78/16 of 24 August 2016;

| 2. | Orders the ECB to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the ECB to pay the costs;

| 3. | Orders the Republic of Finland to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Republic of Finland to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 454, 5.12.2016.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1429 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1429

  To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to reauthorize the 
                        Chesapeake Bay Program.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 26, 2017

Mr. Cardin (for himself and Mrs. Capito) introduced the following bill; 
 which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and 
                              Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to reauthorize the 
                        Chesapeake Bay Program.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Chesapeake Bay Program 
Reauthorization Act''.

SEC. 2. REAUTHORIZATION OF CHESAPEAKE BAY PROGRAM.

    Section 117 of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (33 U.S.C. 
1267) is amended by striking subsection (j) and inserting the 
following:
    ``(j) Authorization of Appropriations.--There are authorized to be 
appropriated to carry out this section such sums as are necessary for 
fiscal year 2018 and each fiscal year thereafter, to remain available 
until expended.''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

 

 

FELIX D. WHITTINGTON,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

DONALD VAUGHN, et al.,

 Defendants.

 CIVIL ACTION

 NO. 02-4346

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 24th day of October, 2002, it is hereby ORDERED that the

attached communication shall be filed by the Clerk.

BY THE COURT:

 

_______________________________________

MARVIN KATZ, S.J.

Case 2:02-cv-04346-MK Document 41 Filed 10/25/2002 Page 1 of 1
# C_2019305EN.01003602.xml

| 9.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 305/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 305/36

---

Judgment of the General Court of 19 June 2019 — L’Oréal v EUIPO — Guinot (MASTER SMOKY)

(Case T-179/16 RENV) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark MASTER SMOKY - Earlier national figurative mark MASTERS COLORS PARIS - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2019/C 305/43)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: L’Oréal (Paris, France) (represented by: T. de Haan and P. Péters, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Hanf, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Guinot (Paris, France) (represented by: A. Sion, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 February 2016 (Case R 2905/2014-5) relating to opposition proceedings between Guinot and L’Oréal.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders L’Oréal to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders L’Oréal to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 222, 20.6.2016.

---