alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

Exhibit 11

Western Reserve Bancorp, Inc.
Consolidated Earnings per Share

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                          Three months ended June 30,    Six months ended June 30,
                                            2004               2003        2004             2003
                                          ---------          --------    ---------       ---------
<S>                                       <C>                <C>         <C>             <C>
Numerator:
     Net income                           $ 208,747          $ 94,527    $ 345,186       $ 229,578

Denominator:
     Denominator for basic earnings per
         share--weighted-average shares     388,054           388,052      388,053         388,052

     Effect of dilutive securities:
         Nonqualified stock options          11,504             9,291       10,398           9,291
                                          ---------          --------    ---------       ---------
     Denominator for diluted earnings
         per share                          399,558           397,343      398,451         397,343
                                          =========          ========    =========       =========

Basic earnings per share                  $    0.54          $   0.24    $    0.89       $    0.59
                                          =========          ========    =========       =========

Diluted earnings per share                $    0.52          $   0.24    $    0.87       $    0.58
                                          =========          ========    =========       =========
</TABLE>

                                    Page 30
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

: CIVIL ACTION NOS.

:

WYLIE : 02-3872

JACOBS, et al. : 02-3931

MORRIS : 02-3968

VARGAS, et al. : 02-4172

WALSH, et al. : 02-4181

WASLH, et al. : 02-4183

BRUNO : 02-4232

BURNETT, et al. : 02-4236

ANCTIL : 02-4285

FISHER, et al. : 02-4293

ASHCRAFT : 02-4297

CHARBONEAU : 02-4308

:

VS. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION, et al. :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of July, 2002, the Court having been previously

advised that the above action cannot proceed to trial and disposition because of the following

reason:

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending disposition of a related

action.

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending determination of

arbitration proceedings.

[ ] - Interlocutory appeal filed.

[ X ] - Other: Case is placed into suspense pending receipt of the Case

Transfer Order from the Judicial Panel on Multi District Litigation

transferring case to District of Minnesota..

It is

ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this action closed for statistical purposes and

place the matter in the Civil Suspense File, and it is

Case 2:02-cv-04293-LDD Document 2 Filed 07/15/2002 Page 1 of 2
FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction; and that the case be

restored to the trial docket when the action is in a status so that it may proceed to final

disposition; this order shall not prejudice the rights of the parties to this litigation.

BY THE COURT:

________________________________________

Legrome D. Davis, Judge

Case 2:02-cv-04293-LDD Document 2 Filed 07/15/2002 Page 2 of 2
No. 49578.

#### Petition 6403-R of H. Segal (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

The record showed that the petitioner made entry on March 19, 1943, at the invoice value, which did not include a 25 percent advance, of which he had notice on February 24, 1943. When the case was before the court on reappraisement the importer stipulated that the value of the merchandise was 25 percent higher than the entered value. While the court stated *247that this act on the part of the petitioner was commendable, it was not sufficient to relieve him from payment of additional duties for undervaluation. In view of *Lowe*v. *United States*(15 Ct. Cust. Appls. 418, T. D. 42590) the court found that the petitioner failed to establish his good faith and the petition was denied.
Case 2:05-cv-00441-MAM Document 91 Filed 03/06/07 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:05-cv-00441-MAM Document 91 Filed 03/06/07 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:05-cv-00441-MAM Document 91 Filed 03/06/07 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:05-cv-00441-MAM Document 91 Filed 03/06/07 Page 4 of 4
**General Fund Receipt (GFR) Account**

**Custodial Collection Transfer to a Different Intragovernmental Treasury Account Symbol (TAS)**

# Background

This scenario was primarily created for the Department of Treasury, Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to account for receipts that are collected in a general fund receipt account i.e., 20 0110, and by law, are distributed to an available receipt account (20X5XXX). The distribution of receipts is reported on the SF 224: Statement of Transactions and creates budget authority for the receiving TAS. Concepts used in this scenario may apply to other entities that distribute custodial collections. To date, other situations have not been identified. If you have a situation for which you believe these accounts and or concepts would be appropriate to use, please complete a USSGL Issues Form found at https://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/fsreports/ref/ussgl/form-issues.htm

· The scenario is not all inclusive of the different types of revenues and/or expenses that may be recorded.  The intent is to illustrate the main concepts through basic transactions. Refer to Section III, Accounting Transactions, of TFM S2 09-02 (as updated) for a complete listing of USSGL accounts that may be recorded.  Section III is located on the USSGL Web site (http://tfm.fiscal.treasury.gov/v1/supplements/ussgl.html). 

· Budgetary and financial reports reflect the pertinent lines to be reported based on the main concepts illustrated.  For full presentations of the reports and line descriptions, refer to the appropriate authoritative guidance (i.e. OMB Circular A-136: Financial Reporting Requirements, OMB Circular No. A-11:  Preparing, Submitting, and Executing the Budget, Treasury Financial Manual references).

· This scenario does not display information specific to Earmarked Funds as defined by FASAB.

· The Budget Enforcement Act category for the programs for the subject IRS program is mandatory. Therefore, reports found in this scenario will reflect the mandatory category.

**USSGL Accounts Used in Scenario**

# 

The following financial statements and reports show the activity as if it were isolated within the individual fund symbols as well as in a consolidated entity.

**Statements for General Fund Receipt Account**

**Statements for General Fund Receipt Account**

**Statements for Special Fund TAFS**

**Statements for Special Fund TAFS**

**Statements for Special Fund TAFS**

**Statements for Special Fund TAFS**

**Consolidated Statements**

Assumes GFR TAS and Special Fund TAFS belong to the same reporting entity.  There are no elimination entries because the 5997F20 and 5998F20 crosswalk to different financial statements.

                                                                       Page 1 of 19
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001051719
<NAME>                        United Defense Industries, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                              28,804
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       65,234
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                        292,663
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   392,127
<PP&E>                                             180,552
<DEPRECIATION>                                           0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,114,522
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              357,617
<BONDS>                                            200,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 1
<OTHER-SE>                                         116,283
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,114,522
<SALES>                                            314,804
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   314,804
<CGS>                                              280,335
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      334,479
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       285
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  15,416
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (19,457)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         1,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (20,457)
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (20,457)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        


</TABLE>
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.  SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF      2002**

| ·   | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| ·   | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company. |
|--------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                                                                                   |   |   |   |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ Edna                  Carter                                                                  |   |   |   |
| Edna                        CarterChief                        Accounting Officer and Controller  |   |   |        |

*This      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not deemed filed by the Company*
*and      is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under      the      Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made      before or after the date of the Report), irrespective of any general      incorporation language contained in such filing*
*.*

----
No. 49100.

#### Protest 102839-K of Greig, Lawrence & Hoyt, Ltd. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the 1 case of rum claimed to have been short-shipped was not imported into the United States, and further that the customs regulations had been complied with. In accordance therewith the collector was directed to reliquidate the entry and make an allowance for the shortage claimed.
( TTqL
) i) , dUG
Comment on the impact this change might have on participation ‘in the TT & L
investment program.

It is our opinion that it will bring the incentive to continue as a TT & L
Depository to a neglible level for most of the small community banks.
Therefore considering the trouble and expense of handling these accounts
for a neglible profit, most of these community banks will probably quit
handling these accounts. These accounts and dollars will then move out of
rural, community banks into large urban banks that will stay with the
program because of volume and the margin will still be greater for them,
but you are moving money available for credit in rural communities. This
will not be good for the country even though it will increase income for
the government.

This will be one more example of moving something from small to big banks.
Please consider this! Thank you.
Very truly yours,
Russell Carothers
Chairman, President & CEO
The Citizens Bank of Winfield
Winfield, AL 35594
Phone Number 205-487-4277

Fax Number 205-487-3799
E-Mail address: cbw@pepperlink.net
(Reap. Dec. 10676)

Entry No. 821894.

#### Hospitaline, Inc. *v.*United States

(Decided on rehearing [not published] February 11, 1964)

*John D. Rode*for the plaintiff.

*John*TV. *Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Olives, Chief Judge:

Counsel for the respective parties have submitted this appeal for reappraisement on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the attorney for the plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise involved in this appeal consists of syringes manufactured in Japan and imported therefrom in 1957; that the facts involved herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Hospitaline Inc.,*A.R.D. 156.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the record in A.R.D. 156 be incorporated in the record in this case.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the prices at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale for exportation to the United States packed ready for delivery in the principal markets of Japan to all purchasers at the time of exportation of the instant merchandise in the *446usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade were the invoiced and entered prices.

On the agreed facts and following tire cited decision on tbe law, I find that the proper basis for appraisement of the syringes in question is statutory export value and hold that such value therefor is the invoiced and entered prices.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

KATHERINE LIGHT

 v.

HOTLINE TELECOMMUNICATIONS

and SEUNG JO KWAK

 No. 02-CV-4357

 Civil Action – Law

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

KINDLY enter my appearance on behalf of the Defendant, Hotline Telecommunications,

in the above matter.

FORRY, ULLMAN, ULLMAN & FORRY, P.C.

 By ________________________________________

ALAN S. BATTISTI

Attorneys for Defendant,

 Hotline Telecommunications

3400 Bath Pike

Suite 312 Park Plaza Professional Center

Bethlehem, Pa 18017

(610) 332-3400

Dated: September 16, 2002.

Case 2:02-cv-04357-TJS Document 11 Filed 09/18/2002 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

KATHERINE LIGHT

 v.

HOTLINE TELECOMMUNICATIONS

and SEUNG JO KWAK

 No. 02-CV-4357

 Civil Action – Law

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a copy of my Entry of Appearance was served upon counsel this date 

via U. S. first class mail, postage prepaid, as follows:

Peter N. Munsing, Esq.

Attorney at Law

939 Penn Avenue

Wyomissing, Pa 19610

FORRY, ULLMAN, ULLMAN & FORRY, P.C.

 By ________________________________________

ALAN S. BATTISTI

Attorneys for Defendant, 

 Hotline Telecommunications

3400 Bath Pike

Suite 312 Park Plaza Professional Center

Bethlehem, Pa 18017

(610) 332-3400

Dated: September 16, 2002.

Case 2:02-cv-04357-TJS Document 11 Filed 09/18/2002 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:02-cv-04414-LDD Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 1 of 36
Case 2:02-cv-04414-LDD Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 2 of 36
Case 2:02-cv-04414-LDD Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 3 of 36
Case 2:02-cv-04414-LDD Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 4 of 36
Case 2:02-cv-04414-LDD Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 5 of 36
Case 2:02-cv-04414-LDD Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 6 of 36
Case 2:02-cv-04414-LDD Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 7 of 36
Case 2:02-cv-04414-LDD Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 8 of 36
Case 2:02-cv-04414-LDD Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 9 of 36
Case 2:02-cv-04414-LDD Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 10 of 36
Case 2:02-cv-04414-LDD Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 11 of 36
Case 2:02-cv-04414-LDD Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 12 of 36
Case 2:02-cv-04414-LDD Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 13 of 36
Case 2:02-cv-04414-LDD Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 14 of 36
Case 2:02-cv-04414-LDD Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 15 of 36
Case 2:02-cv-04414-LDD Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 16 of 36
Case 2:02-cv-04414-LDD Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 17 of 36
Case 2:02-cv-04414-LDD Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 18 of 36
Case 2:02-cv-04414-LDD Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 19 of 36
Case 2:02-cv-04414-LDD Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 20 of 36
Case 2:02-cv-04414-LDD Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 21 of 36
Case 2:02-cv-04414-LDD Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 22 of 36
Case 2:02-cv-04414-LDD Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 23 of 36
Case 2:02-cv-04414-LDD Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 24 of 36
Case 2:02-cv-04414-LDD Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 25 of 36
Case 2:02-cv-04414-LDD Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 26 of 36
Case 2:02-cv-04414-LDD Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 27 of 36
Case 2:02-cv-04414-LDD Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 28 of 36
Case 2:02-cv-04414-LDD Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 29 of 36
Case 2:02-cv-04414-LDD Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 30 of 36
Case 2:02-cv-04414-LDD Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 31 of 36
Case 2:02-cv-04414-LDD Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 32 of 36
Case 2:02-cv-04414-LDD Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 33 of 36
Case 2:02-cv-04414-LDD Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 34 of 36
Case 2:02-cv-04414-LDD Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 35 of 36
Case 2:02-cv-04414-LDD Document 1 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 36 of 36
No. 64795.

#### Roth & Steiner, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 58/3052 (New York).

*346Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of shell strands similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Colonial Bead Co., Inc.*(36 Ct. Cust. Appls. 78, C.A.D. 401), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

: CIVIL ACTION NOS.

:

HAMMOND, et al. : 02-4409

GRESH, et al. : 02-4410

GEARINGER, SR. : 02-4411

BRASSILL : 02-4413

FYE : 02-4414

SEARFOSS : 02-4415

SMITH, et al. : 02-4416

MEYER, et al. : 02-4480

BINDER, et al. : 02-4658

BOULOUS : 02-4659

NEES, SR., et al. : 02-4730

WHELAN, et al. : 02-5164

MENTZER : 02-5165

MCELHINEY, et al. : 02-5317

DELGAUDIO, et al. : 02-5318

WAGNER, et al. : 02-5319

:

V. :

:

DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION :

et al. : :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of August, 2002, it is hereby

ORDERED that the above-captioned case or cases are referred to the Honorable

Charles R. Weiner for the purposes of the monitoring and the coordination of the status of

discovery, scheduling of arbitration hearings (if appropriate), settlement negotiations (if

appropriate), and scheduling trial dates (if appropriate), and it is further

ORDERED that the above-captioned case(s) shall remain on the calendar(s) of the

judge(s) to whom they were assigned at the time of filing, until further order of this court,

and, it is further 

Case 2:02-cv-04409-WY Document 3 Filed 08/13/2002 Page 1 of 2
-2-

ORDERED that counsel for defendant(s) who filed a petition for removal of the

above-captioned case(s) to this court shall serve a copy of this Order on counsel for

plaintiff(s) in the above-captioned case(s), and, it is further

ORDERED that the relevant Prothonotaries of the Courts of Common Pleas

located within the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Eastern District 

of Pennsylvania that the above-captioned case or cases have been removed from shall

retain the original records in these matters, pending further Order of this court.

 

JAMES T. GILES, Ch.J.

Case 2:02-cv-04409-WY Document 3 Filed 08/13/2002 Page 2 of 2
No. 52185.

protest 134617-K (New York).

#### Trinacria Importing Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that passed upon in *Stephen Rug Mills*v. *United States*(32 C. C. P. A. 110, C. A. D. 293), and by the court’s decision on remand in Abstract 50056. In accordance therewith the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 52528.

protest 137527-K (Seattle).

#### Joseph Ullman Fur Brokerage Corp. *v.*United States,

*200Opinion by

Mollison, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of platinum fox fur skins, undressed, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. O. *Brager-Larsen*(36 C. C. P. A. 1, C. A. D. 388,). The claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was therefore sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary  information  extracted from the Balance Sheet at
June 30, 2000 and  Statement  of  Operations  for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2000,  and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such  financial
statements.

</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>        1000

<S>                                 <C>          <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                        3-MOS         6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                 DEC-31-2000   DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                    APR-01-2000   JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                      JUN-30-2000   JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                   6,832        6,832
<SECURITIES>                                 0            0
<RECEIVABLES>                                0            0
<ALLOWANCES>                                 0            0
<INVENTORY>                                  0            0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             0            0
<PP&E>                                 239,594      239,594
<DEPRECIATION>                         (35,911)     (35,911)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                         213,451      213,451
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        0            0
<BONDS>                                142,000      142,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                        0            0
<PREFERRED>                                  0            0
<COMMON>                                     0            0
<OTHER-SE>                              65,966       65,966
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>           213,451      213,451
<SALES>                                 10,175       20,187
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        10,278       20,414
<CGS>                                    3,617        7,170
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            3,617        7,170
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                         3,176        6,189
<LOSS-PROVISION>                             0            0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                       2,268        4,537
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          1,217        2,518
<INCOME-TAX>                                 0            0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                      1,217        2,518
<DISCONTINUED>                               0            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                              0            0
<CHANGES>                                    0            0
<NET-INCOME>                             1,217        2,518
<EPS-BASIC>                                0            0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                0            0



</TABLE>