alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Support

amics Data Support Team

Earth Sciences Data and

es Distributed Active

 DISC DAAC) provides

pport to assist others in

ing and using the GEOS

ervices include assistance

ng and distribution

chnical documents

zation and analysis

demand spatial/variable

ate and run user-provided

rithms to routinely gener

oducts)

ol support

ious user questions and

es

mments, please contact:

st@daac.gsfc.nasa.gov

National Aeronautics andSpace AdministrationGoddard Space Flight CenterGreenbelt, Maryland 20771

Global Gridded Data from

the Goddard Earth

Observing System 

Data Assimilation System

(GEOS-DAS)

NASA Goddard Space Flight Center

GES DISC DAAC

Code 902

Greenbelt, Maryland 20771

Toll-Free: (877) 422-1222

FAX: (301) 614-5304

http://daac.gsfc.nasa.gov/atmodyn/

-11-398-GSFC
Products

set provides 74 physical

g wind, temperature,

 ozone and other impor

ers. The data has a hori

1 degree latitude by 1

36 vertical pressure levels

has a horizontal resolution

y 2.5 degree longitude and

levels). Time-averaged

d over a 3-hour period for

 6-hour period for pres

ata is in HDF-EOS format

mation, please visit

sa.gov).

Online Analysis Tools

The GES DISC DAAC has developed onlinedata viewers and analysis tools for users to analyze, manipulate and assure data quality priorto ordering selected data products.Online AnalySIS (OASIS) provides an IDLbased HTML/CGI interface to search, selectand analyze data online. It supports binary-formatted data such as TOVS, data assimilationproducts and some NCEP operational products.Both tools may be accessed via:http://daac.gsfc.nasa.gov/atmodyn/online_analysisThe Online Gridded Data Viewer is a GrADsenabled web application which plots timeseries, spatial/temporal means, and snapshotincluding wind vector from binary formatteddata.

d Synoptic Files

ct Parameters

eous Surface Pressure,

Surface Type andmore

eous Temperature, Wind,

Humidity, Heightprofiles and more

ime Averaged Files

ct Parameters

y Total Precipitation,

Albedo and more

face Convective Rainfall,

l Snow depth and

more

 Wind Stress and

more

Longwave Radiation

and more

ry Total Ozone

3-D Total Cloud

Fraction

um Wind Tendencies and

Vertical Velocity

Specific Humidity

Tendencies

ure Temperature

Tendencies

rt Cloud Mass Flux

ry Ozone Mixing Ratio
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1558 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1558

 To amend section 203 of Public Law 94-305 to ensure proper authority 
 for the Office of Advocacy of the Small Business Administration, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 13, 2017

   Mr. Risch introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
    referred to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend section 203 of Public Law 94-305 to ensure proper authority 
 for the Office of Advocacy of the Small Business Administration, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Advocacy Empowerment Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. ADDITIONAL POWERS OF THE CHIEF COUNSEL FOR ADVOCACY.

    (a) Chief Counsel Authority.--Section 203(a) of Public Law 94-305 
(15 U.S.C. 634c(a)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (5), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in paragraph (6), by striking the period at the end and 
        inserting a semicolon; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(7) issue, modify, or amend rules governing compliance by 
        agencies with chapter 6 of title 5, United States Code, after 
        opportunity for notice and comment under section 553 of title 
        5, United States Code; and
            ``(8) authorize an agency to issue such supplemental rules 
        governing compliance with chapter 6 of title 5, United States 
        Code, as the Chief Counsel may approve, and ensure that the 
        supplemental rules comply with such chapter 6 and with the 
        notice and comment process under section 553 of title 5, United 
        States Code.''.
    (b) Implementation.--On and after the date that is 270 days after 
the date of enactment of this Act, the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of 
the Small Business Administration may exercise the authority under 
paragraphs (7) and (8) of section 203(a) of Public Law 94-305 (15 
U.S.C. 634c(a)), as added by subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA :

: Criminal No. 04-506-2

vs. :

:

KEVIN JENKINS :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 4th day of November, 2009, it is hereby 

ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Warden of USP Hazelton and

the United States Marshal(s) for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania produce before this Court the body

of Kevin Jenkins, #58608-066 on December 2, 2009 at 11:30 A.M. before the Honorable Berle M.

Schiller, United States District Court Judge to appear for a re-sentencing in the above-captioned matter,

and that immediately upon termination of the said proceedings, he be delivered into the custody of the

said superintendent of the said institution.

 BY THE COURT:

 

Berle M. Schiller, J.

cc: U.S. Marshal (2)

 11/4/09 C. Campoli 

 DATE By Whom

Cr 2 (8/80) 

Case 2:04-cr-00506-BMS Document 263 Filed 11/04/09 Page 1 of 1
FAA Docket Number: FAA-2012-0643

 Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed? 

Organization Person Contacted Date Response 

National Business Aircraft Association Eli Cotti 9/8/11 ---

Regional Airline Association Connie

Arnold

9/8/11 ---

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 9/8/11 ---

ATA Joe White 9/8/11 ---
Before the Third Division,

April 12, 1961

No. 65450.

#### Balfour, Guthrie & Co., Ltd. *v.*United States,

protest 265988-K (Laredo).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *The Best Foods, Inc.*(47 C.C.P.A. 163, C.A.D. 751), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 48444.

#### Protests 954269-G, etc., of Austin Nichols & Co., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
# C_2017293EN.01003101.xml

| 4.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 293/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.9.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 293/31

---

Judgment of the General Court of 20 July 2017 — Cafés Pont v EUIPO — Giordano Vini (Art’s Cafè)

(Case T-309/16) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU figurative trade mark Art’s Cafè - Genuine use of the mark - Article 15(1) and Article 51(1) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2017/C 293/35)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Cafés Pont, SL (Sabadell, Spain) (represented by: E. Manresa Medina and J. Manresa Medina, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Bonne, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Giordano Vini SpA (Diano d’Alba, Italy) (represented by: F. Jacobacci and L. Ghedina, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 1 April 2016 (Case R 1110/2015-2), relating to revocation proceedings between Giordano Vini and Cafés Pont.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Cafés Pont, SL to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Cafés Pont, SL to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 296, 16.8.2016.

1

---
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 1615** 

ADELINE COTTON RICKS , Petitioner ,
v. NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING AND DRY DOCK COMPANY; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION PROGRAMS , Respondents
.

On Pe tition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board
. (08

- 0251; 08

- 0877; 09

- 0567)

Submitted : December 23, 2010 Decided: February 1 , 2011

Before NIEMEYER and WYNN , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by un pub lished per curiam opinion
. Adeline Cotton Ricks, Petitioner Pro Se. Lawrence Philip Postol, SEYFARTH SHAW, LLP, Washington, D.C.; Mark A. Reinhalter, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, Washington, D.C., for Respondent s . Unpublished opinions are not bi nding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Adeline Cotton Ricks seeks review of the Benefits Review Board ’ s decision and order affirming the administrative law judge ’ s denial of black lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.
§§ 901

- 945 (2006) . Our review o f the record discloses that the Board ’ s decision is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error. Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board. Ricks v. Newport News Shpbldg. , Nos. 08

- 0251; 08

- 0877; 09

- 0567 (BRB May 19, 2010) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process. PETITION DENIED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

____________________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 05-347

 :

v. :

 :

EPHRAIM E. BARR : CIVIL ACTION NO. 09-5091 

____________________________________ :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 21st day of February 2013, upon consideration of Petitioner’s

Amended, Counseled Habeas Corpus Motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 [Doc. No.255] and the

Government’s opposition thereto, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum,

it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Petitioner’s Motion is DENIED; and 

2. The Court finds no ground upon which to issue a certificate of appealability.

It is so ORDERED. 

BY THE COURT:

 /s/ Cynthia M. Rufe

_____________________

CYNTHIA M. RUFE, J.
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 22 (Monday, February 3, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 6236]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-02186]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL FOUNDATION ON THE ARTS AND HUMANITIES

National Endowment for the Humanities

Public Availability of the National Endowment for the Humanities 
FY 2013 Service Contract Inventory

AGENCY: National Endowment for the Humanities.

ACTION: Notice of Public Availability of FY 2013 Service Contract 
Inventory.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with Section 743 of Division C of the 
Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2010 (Pub. L. 111-117), the National 
Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) is publishing this notice to advise 
the public of the availability of the FY 2013 Service Contract 
Inventory. This inventory provides information on service contract 
actions over $25,000 that were made in FY 2013. The information is 
organized by function to show how contracted resources are distributed 
throughout the agency. The inventory has been developed in accordance 
with guidance issued on November 5, 2010 and December 19, 2011 by the 
Office of Management and Budget's Office of Federal Procurement Policy 
(OFPP). OFPP's guidance is available at http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/procurement-service-contract-inventories. NEH has posted its FY 2013 
inventory documents on its Web site at the following link: http://www.neh.gov/about/legal/reports.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Barry Maynes in the Administrative 
Services Office at 202-606-8233 or bmaynes@neh.gov.

    Dated: January 28, 2014.
Michael P. McDonald,
General Counsel and Federal Register Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2014-02186 Filed 1-31-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7536-01-P
```
|   | § | This      Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,and |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | § | The      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial position and results of operations of Western      Reserve Bancorp, Inc. as of and for the periods  presented. |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/      Edward J. McKeon             |
|--------------------------------------------|
| Edward      J. McKeon                      |
| President      and Chief Executive Officer |
| November      16, 2009                     |

----
Exhibit 31.1

INDEPENDENCE LEAD MINES COMPANY

December 31, 2005



CERTIFICATIONS



I, Bernard C. Lannen, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Independence Lead Mines Company.



2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;



4. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:



a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;



b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and



5. The small business issuers other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



a)  all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design  or operation of internal controls  over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and



b)  any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting.







Date: March 28, 2006



/s/ Bernard C. Lannen

President
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Phantom Fiber Corporation (the "Company")
      on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey
      T. Halloran ,
      Chief
      Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


April
                  14, 2008Jeffrey
                  T. HalloranChief
                  Executive Officer andPrincipal
                  Financial Officer
No. 58919.

protest 233681-K (New York).

#### Vanderlaan Tile Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of wall tile, valued at 40 cents per square foot; that it is not wholly or in part of cement; and that it is not quarries or quarry tiles. Accepting the stipulation as establishing the facts therein recited, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# C_2019044EN.01001901.xml

| 4.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/19

---

Judgment of the General Court of 22 November 2018 — Saleh Thabet and Others v Council

(Cases T-274/16 and T-275/16) (1)

((Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken in view of the situation in Egypt - Freezing of funds - Objectives - Criteria for inclusion of persons targeted - Renewal of the applicants’ designation on the list of persons targeted - Factual basis - Plea of illegality - Legal basis - Proportionality - Right to a fair trial - Presumption of innocence - Principle of good administration - Error of law - Manifest error of assessment - Right to property - Rights of defence - Right to effective judicial protection))

(2019/C 44/23)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant in Case T-274/16: Suzanne Saleh Thabet (Cairo, Egypt) (represented by B. Kennelly QC, J. Pobjoy, Barrister, G. Martin, M. Rushton and C. Enderby Smith, Solicitors)

Applicants in Case T-275/16: Gamal Mohamed Hosni Elsayed Mubarak (Cairo), Alaa Mohamed Hosni Elsayed Mubarak (Cairo), Heidy Mahmoud Magdy Hussein Rasekh (Cairo), Khadiga Mahmoud El Gammal (Cairo) (represented by: B. Kennelly, J. Pobjoy, G. Martin, M. Rushton and C. Enderby Smith)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented initially by: S. Kyriakopoulou and M. Veiga, and subsequently by S. Kyriakopoulou and J. Kneale, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of (i) Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/411 of 18 March 2016 amending Decision 2011/172/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Egypt (OJ 2016 L 74, p. 40); (ii) Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/496 of 21 March 2017 amending Decision 2011/172/CFSP concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Egypt (OJ 2017 L 76, p. 22); and (iii) Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2017/491 of 21 March 2017 implementing Regulation (EU) No 270/2011 concerning restrictive measures directed against certain persons, entities and bodies in view of the situation in Egypt (OJ 2017 L 76, p. 10), in so far as those acts apply to the applicants.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Orders that Cases T-274/16 and T-275/16 be joined for the purposes of the judgment; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Orders that Cases T-274/16 and T-275/16 be joined for the purposes of the judgment;

| 2. | Dismisses the actions; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the actions;

| 3. | Orders Ms Suzanne Saleh Thabet, Mr Gamal Mohamed Hosni Elsayed Mubarak, Mr Alaa Mohamed Hosni Elsayed Mubarak, Ms Heidy Mahmoud Magdy Hussein Rasekh and Ms Khadiga Mahmoud El Gammal to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Ms Suzanne Saleh Thabet, Mr Gamal Mohamed Hosni Elsayed Mubarak, Mr Alaa Mohamed Hosni Elsayed Mubarak, Ms Heidy Mahmoud Magdy Hussein Rasekh and Ms Khadiga Mahmoud El Gammal to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 270, 25.7.2016.

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 99-6324

DAVID LEE FRANKLIN, Petitioner - Appellant, versus NORTH CAROLINA ATTORNEY GENERAL; RICK JACKSON; MIKE EASLEY, Respondents - Appellees.Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Paul Trevor Sharp, Magistrate Judge. (CA-98-993-1) Submitted: June 17, 1999 Decided: June 24, 1999 Before MURNAGHAN and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. David Lee Franklin, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: David Lee Franklin seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254(West 1994 & Supp. 1999). We have reviewed the record and the magistrate judge’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the magistrate judge. See Franklin v. North Carolina Attorney General , No. CA-98-993-1 (M.D.N.C. Feb. 23, 1999).We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED