alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2021338EN.01001701.xml

| 23.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 338/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 338/17

---

Judgment of the General Court of 7 July 2021 — HM v Commission

(Case T-587/16 RENV) (1)

(Civil service - Officials - Recruitment - Competition notice EPSO/AST-SC/03/15 - Refusal to allow participation in the assessment tests - Request for review - Refusal to forward that request to the selection board for the open competition on the grounds that it was out of time - Division of competences between EPSO and the competition selection board - Interest in bringing proceedings)

(2021/C 338/20)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: HM (represented by: H. Tettenborn, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Bohr and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application on the basis of Article 270 TFEU for the annulment of the decision of the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) of 17 August 2015 not to take into account the request for review of the decision of the selection board not to allow the applicant to participate in the next stage of Competition EPSO/AST-SC/03/15-3.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) of 17 August 2015 not to take into account the request for review of the decision of the selection board not to allow the applicant to participate in the next stage of Competition EPSO/AST-SC/03/15-3; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) of 17 August 2015 not to take into account the request for review of the decision of the selection board not to allow the applicant to participate in the next stage of Competition EPSO/AST-SC/03/15-3;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs relating to the initial proceedings before the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (F-17/16) and the General Court (T-587/16), the proceedings before the Court of Justice in Case C-70/19 P and the present referral proceedings (T-587/16 RENV). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs relating to the initial proceedings before the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (F-17/16) and the General Court (T-587/16), the proceedings before the Court of Justice in Case C-70/19 P and the present referral proceedings (T-587/16 RENV).

---

(1)  OJ C 191, 30.5.2016 (case initially registered before the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union under number F-17/16 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1.9.2016).

---
No. 48437.

#### Protests 777906-G/10310, etc., of Continental Grain Co. et al. (New Orleans, etc.).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
----

Euro exchange rates (1)

5 July 2006

(2006/C 157/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

----
# rjo N MERRIL

L ARNON E& JONES , LLP ^ S I 0-100901-07 3

Augus t 23 , 201 0 Th e Honorabl e Ra y LaHoo d Secretary o f

Transportatio n U.S . Departmen t

o f Transportatio n 120 0 Ne w Jerse y Avenu e S E Washingto nD C 2059 0 Subject : Docke t

OST-2010-012 4 ---,: o :x i

> m —iC/" J [-n-Pf- n ^"^ ^ C O Dear Secretar y LaHood : I serv e a s th e Chairma n o f th e Sonom aCount y Airlin e Attractio n Conunitte e an da mwritin g i n support o f th e Charle s M . Schulz»Sonom aCount y Airport' s curren t applicatio n fo r

agran t unde r th e Smal l Communit y Ai r

Servic e Developmen t

Program . Thi s gran t

alon g wit hloca l fund s wil l provid e for marketin g an dadvertisin g t o attrac t inboun dpassenger s t o Sonom aCount y o n Horizo n Air . Horizo nAi r

ha s provide dexcellen t

nonsto p ai r

servic e t o Lo s Angeles , La s Vegas , Portland , an d Seattl e whic hha s bee n enthusiasticall y supporte db y th e loca l Sonom aCount y market . Nonetheless , w e ar e stil l no t

gettin g th e inboun dpassenge r number s tha t

w e should . Sonom aCounty' s touris man dwin e countr y enterprise s ar e critica l t o ou r loca l econom y an dit s recover y fro mth e ciuren t challenges . Th e Sonom aCount y Airpor t

ha s develope darobus t progra mt o attrac t

inboun dvisitor s t o Sonom aCount y an dincreas e th e revenu e fo r Horizo n Ai r

togethe r wit hth e businesse s an dagencie s involve du i thos e industries . . : , , : I nspit e o f

thes e effort s an dsuppor t th e cos t o f marketin g an dadvertisin g i n Lo s Angeles , Portland , an dSeattl e i s simpl y to o hi ^ fo r th e Sonom aCount y Airpor t an dit s marketin g partner s t o d o i t b y themselves . Th e awar do f th e requeste dgran t

wil l provid e th e fundin g dia t i s neede dt o d o th e job ! W e believ e tha t

thi s increase dtraffi c wil l generat e ove r $1 1 millio n i n visito r

spendin g i nou r communit y an di n doin g s o revitaliz e th e econom y an dappi»oiot e youtguppor t o f ou r program .

MPM/cp r 'Michae l P . M s MerriU<Afnon e i Chairma n Sonom aCoimt y AirlineAttractio n Committe e

LAWOIIlCh S ^^^ i Ki U NDIUK NBl\l). . S I 1 . .<il. * NA M \liOS \I

. \')^.)il ^ •"(> " ^.;SJx.'< 2 • I A X l~i)" i i2N-fi(M T I 'ii.iil ; h:iii(''iiia|l.iw.i<i m • Wibsiii- : iii,iil.iM.v-iMi i
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Statement of Chief Financial Officer Furnished Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

          The undersigned, Gary F. Hoskins, is the Chief Financial Officer of Citizens South Banking Corporation (the “Company”).

          This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the Company of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 (the “Report”).

          By execution of this statement, I certify that to the best of my knowledge:

|   | A)     | the Report   fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the   Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and                                                                |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                 |
|   | B)     | the   information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material   respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as   of the dates and for the periods covered by the Report. |

| May 8, 2006 | /s/ Gary F.   Hoskins     |
|-------------|---------------------------|
| Dated       |                           |
|        | Gary F.   Hoskins         |
|        | Chief   Financial Officer |

          This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  It is not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

          A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Citizens South Banking Corporation and will be retained by Citizens South Banking Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

22

----
IN THE UNITED STATES OF DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

 

 : MDL DOCKET NO. 1203 

IN RE DIET DRUGS : 

(PHENTERMINE/FENFLURAMINE/ : 

DEXFENFLURAMINE) PRODUCTS : 

LIABILITY LITIGATION : MDL NO. 02-20143 

 : 

 : 

CYNTHIA ACOSTA, ET AL. : 

 : 

v. : 

 : 

AMERICAN HOME PRODUCTS : 

CORPORATION, ET AL. : 

 : 

PRETRIAL ORDER NO. 

 AND NOW TO WIT: This ____ day of _______________, 2005, it having been 

reported that the issues between the parties have been settled with respect to plaintiff Danita 

McDaniel in the above-captioned action, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1(b) 

of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby 

 ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, all claims of plaintiff Danita 

McDaniel in the above-captioned action are DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to 

all named Defendants. 

MICHAEL E. KUNZ, Clerk of Court 

BY: ____________________________ 

Katherine Gallagher 

Deputy Clerk 

Case 2:02-cv-20143-HB Document 23 Filed 04/13/2005 Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 15, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 6, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 98 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-42, CP2024-42.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-25255 Filed 11-14-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
(Reap. Dec. 10974)

#### Sharwell Brothers Shoe Co. Globe Shipping Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 881533.

(Decided May 10, 1965)

*Allerton deO. Tomplcms*for the plaintiffs.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Nichols, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement is before me on the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties:

> It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between counsel for the Plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, Defendant, that the items marked “A” and initialed ROB by Examiner R. C. Brueato on the invoice covered by the above-named reappraisement appeal, consist of footwear from Japan appraised on the basis of “export value” as defined in Section 402(b), Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956.

> That at the time of exportation, such footwear was freely sold in the principal markets of Japan in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States at the invoice unit prices, net, packed (which prices are f.o.b. Kobe, Japan).

> The above appeal is, subject to the approval of the court, submitted for decision upon this stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find and hold that export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, 70 Stat. 943, is the proper *653basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise involved herein and that said value is represented by the invoice unit prices, net, packed (which prices are f.o.b. Kobe, Japan).

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
# C_2017269EN.01002201.xml

| 14.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/22

---

Order of the General Court of 21 June 2017 — Inox Mare v Commission

(Case T-347/16) (1)

1

((Action for annulment - Customs Union - Commission decision finding that the repayment of import duties is not justified in a particular case - Action brought by a separate operator - No direct concern - Inadmissibility))

(2017/C 269/31)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Inox Mare Srl (Rimini, Italy) (represented by: R. Holzeisen, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Caeiros, J. Baquero Cruz and D. Nardi, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking annulment of Commission Decision C(2015) 9672 final of 6 January 2016 finding that the repayment of import duties is not justified in a particular case (REM 02/14).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | Inox Mare Srl shall bear its own costs and also pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Inox Mare Srl shall bear its own costs and also pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 296, 16.8.2016.

1

---
----

| Parent Company                                   |   | Subsidiary Companies                        |   | State of Incorporation |
|--------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------|
|                                             |   |                                        |   |                   |
| First Federal of Northern Michigan Bancorp, Inc. |   | First Federal of Northern Michigan          |   | Federal                |
|                                             |   |                                        |   |                   |
| First Federal of Northern Michigan               |   | Financial Services and Mortgage Corporation |   | Michigan               |
|                                             |   |                                        |   |                   |
| First Federal of Northern Michigan               |   | FFNM Agency, Inc                            |   | Michigan               |

----
<PAGE>
                                   Exhibit 24

                               POWER OF ATTORNEY

                        INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY
             Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended
                               December 31, 1999


The undersigned directors of INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY, an Indiana
corporation (the "Company"), do hereby constitute and appoint E. LINN DRAPER,
JR., ARMANDO A. PENA and HENRY W. FAYNE, and each of them, their
attorneys-in-fact and agents, to execute for them, and in their names, and in
any and all of their capacities, the Annual Report of the Company on Form
10-K, pursuant to Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 1999, and any and all amendments thereto, and
to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection
therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said
attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to
do and perform every act and thing required or necessary to be done, as fully
to all intents and purposes as the undersigned might or could do in person,
hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents,
or any of them, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have signed these presents this 2nd
day of March, 2000.


      /s/ Karl G. Boyd                    /s/ Armando A. Pena
Karl G. Boyd                              Armando A. Pena


      /s/ E. Linn Draper, Jr.             /s/ John R. Sampson
E. Linn Draper, Jr.                       John R. Sampson


      /s/ Jeffrey A. Drozda               /s/ D. B. Synowiec
Jeffrey A. Drozda                   D. B. Synowiec


      /s/ Henry W. Fayne                  /s/ J. H. Vipperman
Henry W. Fayne                            J. H. Vipperman


      /s/ Wm. J. Lhota                    /s/ W. E. Walters
Wm. J. Lhota                              W. E. Walters


      /s/ Mark W. Marano                  /s/ E. H. Wittkamper
Mark W. Marano                            E. H. Wittkamper
# Map            Croatia.
(Reap. Dec. 10330)

Entry No. 722324, etc.

#### Plywood & Door Manufacturers Corporation *v.*United States

(Decided September 4, 1962)

*Richard, Van Bteenburgh*for the plaintiff.

*Joseph D. Guilfoyle,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

OliveR, Chief Judge:

The merchandise the subject of the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in schedule “A,” attached hereto, consists of birch plywood, exported from Finland in the years 1953, 1954, and 1955.

Counsel for the parties have stipulated and agreed that the merchandise and issues involved in the said appeals are the same in all material respects as those in the case of *United States*v. *Plywood & Door Manufacturers*Corporation, 46 Cust. Ct. 797, A.R.D. 133, and that the record in the cited case may be incorporated as part of the record herein.

The appeals have been submitted for decision upon written stipulation, on the basis of which I find that export value, as defined in section 402(d), Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis for the determination of the values of the birch plywood involved and that such values were those set forth in column “4” of said schedule “A,” packed, less the prorated amounts of the nondutiable charges set forth directly after the description of the merchandise in each said reappraisement case set forth in schedule “A.”

Judgment will issue accordingly.
<PAGE>
                                   EXHIBIT 11
                          Flagstar Capital Corporation
                  Computation of Net Earnings per Common Share
                      (In thousands, except per share data)


In order to calculate net earnings per share of common stock, the Company must
first subtract the dividend requirements of the Series A Preferred Shares to
arrive at net earnings available to the common stockholders. Net earnings per
share are calculated by dividing net earnings available to common stockholders
by the average number of common shares outstanding during the period.





<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                      For the         For the
                                              For the             For the              nine            nine
                                              quarter             quarter              months          months
                                               ended               ended               ended           ended
                                             September           September           September       September
                                             30, 2002            30, 2001            30, 2002        30, 2001
                                             --------            --------            --------        --------

<S>                                           <C>                 <C>                 <C>            <C>
Net Earnings                                   $3,083              $1,728              $8,901         $5,411
Less: preferred stock dividends                 1,222               1,222               3,666          3,666
                                             --------            --------            --------        --------
Net income available to common
stockholders                                   $1,861              $  506              $5,235         $1,745
                                             ========            ========            ========        ========

Average common shares outstanding
                                                1,000               1,000               1,000          1,000

Net earnings per common share                  $ 1.86              $ 0.51              $ 5.24         $ 1.75

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32(i)

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Dialog Group,
Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Peter V. DeCrescenzo, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, that:

      (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: November 17, 2006


                                        /s/ Peter V. DeCrescenzo
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Peter V. DeCrescenzo, CEO
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

 

: CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-4182

Denise McClellan 

:

vs.

:

Edward Stanley, Jr., et al 

:

ORDER REFERRING CASE TO ARBITRATION AND APPOINTING ARBITRATORS

AND NOW, this day of , , it is hereby 

ORDERED, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 53.2, Section 4(a), that the above civil action is herewith

referred to arbitration and 

Chairman Joseph Lynch, Esq. 

Arbitrator Joseph Lombardo, Esq. 

Arbitrator Joel Kalman, Esq. 

having been selected at random by the arbitration clerk from among those certified as arbitrators, shall hear this case at 9:30

am, Tuesday, December 3, 2002. PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS ARBITRATION HEARING WILL BE HELD IN

THE ROBERT N.C. NIX BUILDING, 900 MARKET ST., PHILADELPHIA, PA 19107. REPORT TO ROOM

339 FOR YOUR ROOM ASSIGNMENT, pursuant to a notice which shall this day be mailed by the arbitration clerk to

all counsel of record and the arbitrators, the arbitrators being authorized to change the time and date of the arbitration

hearing provided the hearing is commenced within 30 days of the hearing date set forth in this order (continuances beyond

this 30 day period must be approved by the court) and the clerk of court is notified of the change; and it is 

FURTHER ORDERED, that all documentary evidence shall be marked in advance and exchanged,

except for impeaching documents; and that the above designated chairman shall file with the clerk of court the arbitration

award after the hearing is concluded.

The failure of counsel to promptly advise the arbitrators and the Arbitration Section of the Clerk's

Office of the settlement or other final disposition of this case may result in appropriate discipline by the Court pursuant to

Local Civil Rule 83.6.1.

BY THE COURT

 

HONORABLE HARVEY BARTLE III 

 

ARB1.FRM 

Case 2:02-cv-04182-HB Document 7 Filed 12/03/2002 Page 1 of 1