alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1



                                                                      EXHIBIT 11
                          Flagstar Capital Corporation
                      Computation of Net Earnings per Share
                      (In thousands, except per share data)


In order to calculate net earnings per share of common  stock,  the Company must
first  subtract the dividend  requirements  of the Series A Preferred  Shares to
arrive at net earnings  available to the common  stockholders.  Net earnings per
share is calculated by dividing net earnings available to common stockholders by
the average number of common shares outstanding during the period.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                      For the          For the         For the         For the
                                      quarter          quarter        six months      six months
                                       ended            ended           ended           ended
                                      June 30,         June 30,        June 30,        June 30,
                                        2000             1999            2000            1999
                                      -------          --------       ----------      ----------
<S>                                   <C>              <C>            <C>             <C>
Net Earnings                           $1,757           $1,626          $3,417          $3,404
Less: preferred stock dividends         1,222            1,222           2,444           2,444
                                       ------           ------          ------          ------
Net income available to common stock   $  535           $  404          $  973          $  960
                                       ======           ======          ======          ======

Average common shares outstanding       1,000            1,000           1,000           1,000

Net earnings per share - basic         $ 0.53           $ 0.40          $ 0.97          $ 0.96
</TABLE>








                                       12
Case 2:05-cv-01880-LP Document 1-3 Filed 04/22/2005 Page 1 of 27
Case 2:05-cv-01880-LP Document 1-3 Filed 04/22/2005 Page 2 of 27
Case 2:05-cv-01880-LP Document 1-3 Filed 04/22/2005 Page 3 of 27
Case 2:05-cv-01880-LP Document 1-3 Filed 04/22/2005 Page 4 of 27
Case 2:05-cv-01880-LP Document 1-3 Filed 04/22/2005 Page 5 of 27
Case 2:05-cv-01880-LP Document 1-3 Filed 04/22/2005 Page 6 of 27
Case 2:05-cv-01880-LP Document 1-3 Filed 04/22/2005 Page 7 of 27
Case 2:05-cv-01880-LP Document 1-3 Filed 04/22/2005 Page 8 of 27
Case 2:05-cv-01880-LP Document 1-3 Filed 04/22/2005 Page 9 of 27
Case 2:05-cv-01880-LP Document 1-3 Filed 04/22/2005 Page 10 of 27
Case 2:05-cv-01880-LP Document 1-3 Filed 04/22/2005 Page 11 of 27
Case 2:05-cv-01880-LP Document 1-3 Filed 04/22/2005 Page 12 of 27
Case 2:05-cv-01880-LP Document 1-3 Filed 04/22/2005 Page 13 of 27
Case 2:05-cv-01880-LP Document 1-3 Filed 04/22/2005 Page 14 of 27
Case 2:05-cv-01880-LP Document 1-3 Filed 04/22/2005 Page 15 of 27
Case 2:05-cv-01880-LP Document 1-3 Filed 04/22/2005 Page 16 of 27
Case 2:05-cv-01880-LP Document 1-3 Filed 04/22/2005 Page 17 of 27
Case 2:05-cv-01880-LP Document 1-3 Filed 04/22/2005 Page 18 of 27
Case 2:05-cv-01880-LP Document 1-3 Filed 04/22/2005 Page 19 of 27
Case 2:05-cv-01880-LP Document 1-3 Filed 04/22/2005 Page 20 of 27
Case 2:05-cv-01880-LP Document 1-3 Filed 04/22/2005 Page 21 of 27
Case 2:05-cv-01880-LP Document 1-3 Filed 04/22/2005 Page 22 of 27
Case 2:05-cv-01880-LP Document 1-3 Filed 04/22/2005 Page 23 of 27
Case 2:05-cv-01880-LP Document 1-3 Filed 04/22/2005 Page 24 of 27
Case 2:05-cv-01880-LP Document 1-3 Filed 04/22/2005 Page 25 of 27
Case 2:05-cv-01880-LP Document 1-3 Filed 04/22/2005 Page 26 of 27
Case 2:05-cv-01880-LP Document 1-3 Filed 04/22/2005 Page 27 of 27
No. 59997.

#### H. J. Devoy and Ro Tex Products *v.*United States,

protest 209541-K (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

It was stipulated that for duty purposes the clean content of the wool in question was determined in accordance with the instructions contained in T. D. 53159, which was issued following *United States*v. *Fred Whitaker Company, Inc.*(40 C. C. P. A. 19, C. A. D. 492). In that ease, it was held that the statutory language, clean content of wool, as used in paragraph 1102 (b), was construed to mean the product commercially usable as wool and from which all the weight of grease and foreign material has been removed, including the wool fibers which are unavoidably and irrevocably lost as a result of commercially applied cleaning processes. Accordingly, the wool in question was held dutiable at the rate applied by the collector on the basis of the percentages of clean content as set forth in the column headed “Clean Content T. D. 53159” in the schedule attached to and made a part of the decision in this case.
# C_2016392EN.01000602.xml

| 24.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 392/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 392/6

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Symvoulio tis Epikrateias (Greece) lodged on 22 July 2016 — Ypourgos Esoterikon, Ypourgos Paideias kai Thriskevmaton v Maria-Eleni Kalliri

(Case C-409/16)

(2016/C 392/08)

Language of the case: Greek

Referring court

Referring court

Symvoulio tis Epikrateias (Greece)

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellants: Ypourgos Esoterikon, Ypourgos Paideias kai Thriskevmaton

Appellants:

Respondent: Maria-Eleni Kalliri

Respondent:

Question referred

Question referred

Is Article 1(1) of Presidential Decree 90/2003, which amended Article 2(1) of Presidential Decree 4/1995 and provides that civilian candidates for the Officers’ School and the School for Policemen of the Police Academy must, amongst other qualifications, ‘be of a height (in the case of men and women) of at least 1.70 m’, compatible with Directives 76/207/EEC, (1) 2002/73/EC (2) and 2006/54/EC, (3) which prohibit any indirect discrimination on grounds of sex as regards access to employment, vocational training and promotion, and working conditions, in the public sector (unless that ultimate different treatment is attributable to factors which are objectively justified and are unrelated to any discrimination on grounds of sex, and does not go beyond what is appropriate and necessary in order to serve the objective pursued by the measure)?

1

2

3

---

(1)  Council Directive 76/207/EEC of 9 February 1976 on the implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women as regards access to employment, vocational training and promotion, and working conditions (OJ 1976 L 39, p. 40).

1

(2)  Directive 2002/73/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 September 2002 amending Council Directive 76/207/EEC on the implementation of the principle of equal treatment for men and women as regards access to employment, vocational training and promotion, and working conditions (OJ 2002 L 269, p. 15).

2

(3)  Directive 2006/54/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 July 2006 on the implementation of the principle of equal opportunities and equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation (OJ 2006 L 204, p. 23).

3

---
No. 51936.

#### Park & Tilford Import Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 811503-G (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

An examination, of the record disclosing nothing that would warrant the court in disturbing the finding of the collector, which was presumptively correct, the protest was overruled.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MLEA, INC., as Successor in : CIVIL ACTION

Interest to ENGINEERED GAS :

SYSTEMS, LLP and MAINE LINE :

ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES :

:

v. :

:

ATLANTIC RECYCLED RUBBER, INC.:

RECOVERY TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, :

INC., and CASELLA WASTE :

SYSTEMS, INC. : NO. 02-CV-4393

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 15th day of March, 2004, the Court,

having received a Suggestion of Bankruptcy from the plaintiff’s

counsel stating that Bankruptcy was filed on March 12, 2004, on

behalf of the plaintiff, enters the following Order:

1. This matter is STAYED until further Order of the

Court.

2. Counsel for the plaintiff shall advise the Court

every 90 days as to the status of this bankruptcy proceeding.

BY THE COURT:

 

JAMES McGIRR KELLY, J.

Case 2:02-cv-04393-JS Document 28 Filed 03/16/2004 Page 1 of 1
(Reap. Dec. 10349)

Entry No. 5406, etc.

#### Plywood & Door Manufacturers Corporation *v.*United States

(Decided October 10, 1962)

*Richard Van Steenburgh*for the plaintiff.

*Joseph T). Guilfoyle,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

OliveR, Chief Judge:

The merchandise the subject of the appeals

for reappraisement enumerated in schedule “A,” attached hereto, consists of birch plywood exported from Finland in the years 1952, 1953,1954, and 1955.

Counsel for the parties have stipulated and agreed that the merchandise and issues involved in the said appeals are the same in all material respects as those in the case of *United States*v. *Plywood & Door Manufacturers*Corporation, 46 Cust. Ct. 797, A.R.D. 133, and that the record in that case be incorporated as part of the record herein.

The appeals have been submitted for decision upon written stipulation, on the basis of which I find that export value, as defined in section 402(d), Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis for the determination of the values of the birch plywood involved and that such values were those set forth in column “4” of said schedule “A,” packed, less the prorated amounts of the nondutiable charges set forth directly after the description of the merchandise in each said reappraisement case set forth in schedule “A.”

Judgment will issue accordingly.
<ASX version="3.0">	<ENTRY>		<REF HREF="mms://multimedia.mcpa.virginia.edu/911/hearing10/2004041301_high.asf" />	</ENTRY></ASX>
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the accompanying Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of PG&E
National Energy Group, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2002, I, Thomas B.
King, President and Chief Executive Officer of PG&E National Energy Group,
Inc., hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and
belief, that:



| | (1) |  | such Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of PG&E
National Energy Group, Inc. for the year ended December 31,
2002, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                    
| | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | the information contained in such Annual Report
on Form 10-K/A of PG&E National Energy Group, Inc. for the
year ended December 31, 2002, fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
PG&E National Energy Group, Inc..

| |  | /s/ THOMAS B. KING
| |  | ------------------
| |  |                   
| |  | THOMAS B. KING    
| |  |                   
| |  | President         

March 12, 2003
CROSS SERVICING SAMPLE ONLY

AGENCY LETTERHEAD

Date:    April 4, 2005

To:    Department of the Treasury

    Financial Management Service

    Kansas City Financial Center

    4241 NE 34th Street

    Kansas City, MO  64117

From:    John D. Doe

    Director

Subject:    Approving Official Self-delegation

In accordance with the authority vested in me as *Director, Office of Personnel Management*, *Washington, DC*, I hereby self-designate myself as Approving Official.  As Approving Official, I reserve the right to relegate this authority.  

The following Agency Location Code is applicable:  0000 1234

Thus, I authorize individuals listed on the ALC Approver form from *(Agency Name)* to view data related to the above ALC.

If you should have any questions, please contact Jane D. Doe, at (816) 414-2340.

----- / S / -----

John D. Doe

Director
EXHIBIT 32.1

                 STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER FURNISHED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     The undersigned, Kim S. Price, is the President and Chief Executive Officer
of Citizens South Banking Corporation (the "Company").

     This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the
Company of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2005 (the "Report").

     By execution of this statement, I certify that to the best of my knowledge:

          A)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a)
               or 78o(d)) and

          B)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
               covered by the Report.


August 9, 2005                        /s/ Kim S. Price
                                      -------------------------------------
Dated                                 Kim S. Price
                                      President and Chief Executive Officer

         This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report
so that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that this
statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.

         A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has
been provided to Citizens South Banking Corporation and will be retained by
Citizens South Banking Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

                                       22
# Sum of Change- Bulletin 2014-07

# Additional Information
### 86

OFFICE OFTHE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS AUSTIN

3rc+&l ~xi.00 par &ontb ..* . ... . .... . . T,mo.oo* \ rod akiea that. Lhe Comptrollsr h811 1nCorwd you tht ar+mdlturss odor ltemt 110 ami 1%) l uould bb nn a basis .m aaauul ond litsited l;o not ltoro than one-twslrth or tbe total per contb, ilwim tbs **tieoirl year.** * **YOU ank**  **ii tlris**  **lo corr00t.** 

### 867 **Jonorable .I.**  **l?. UUOMld**  **- PWJ**  2

l Al.11mnual wlnriem shall bop&d **iB** cmelro **equal** aionthlyinstallmeats.
. . .*

Not #o, bowever, where l lumplnm$8 prmidM out of wlxLohan itieternjnate **ausber of**  eauplo~es8maybe paid. idlridual 8alorlra **out** ot **au&** appropci8tion* ecay not axooai lo.any uno ~uoth one-fwelith ol the snotrsl rate; buLuore than oae+m3Lftb **Of** the total **epprOpIda Lion**  rw7 **be** arpeutled lo one irmtb, by tinus ut’ the **Saot tbat**  **&be number**  **oT ~sitions**  **i. no%**  1irdLcd.

You 6~0 therefore rdrlaed that itens 119 **and ii!0**  **iue DOG**  **subject** bu Lhe llmit8tlon lhot the tot81 UIpenditura~ Warefrom for one won&h my not exoead onewolfua of the **approprlatad** mounf.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

VICTORIA BAILEY :

: CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-CV-4231

Plaintiff, :

:

v. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION;

BAYER AG;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE;

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM

:

:

:

:

:

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

:

Defendants. :

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of the Court:

Kindly enter the appearances of Hope S. Freiwald, Aline Fairweather, Erin

Brennan and Kirstin J. Miller as attorneys for defendant SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a

GlaxoSmithKline.

Respectfully Submitted,

_____________________________ _____________________________

Hope S. Freiwald Aline Fairweather

_____________________________ _____________________________

Erin Brennan Kirstin J. Miller

DECHERT PRICE & RHOADS

4000 Bell Atlantic Tower

1717 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2793

(215) 994-4000

Case 2:02-cv-04231-CMR Document 8 Filed 09/16/2002 Page 1 of 1
DEPARTMENT OF 

RA!'!SPORTATiON 

•<:m UHhHAilONS 

Mayor's Office 

Kitty Piercy 

ZOiOTT- ! AK3:2 U 

City of Eugene 

777 Pearl Street, Room 105 

Eugene, Oregon 97401-2793 

(541)682-5010 

(541) 682-5414 Fax 

August 10, 2010 

Susan Kurland 

Assistant Secretary for Aviation & International Affairs, X-1 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE W88-324 

Washington, DC 20590 

Subject: Small Community Air Service Development Program 

Docket DOT-OST-2010-0124 

Eugene Airport 

Dear Ms, Kurland: 

As the Mayor of Eugene and a frequent air traveler, I strongly support the air service 

proposal detailed in the subject Small Community Air Service Development Program 

grant application. Non-stop service to San Jose or alternately San Diego would be a 

significant benefit to our region and would stimulate economic growth for the City of 

Eugene. 

Increasmg commercial air service options is critical to our economy. The proposed plan 

will attract an excellent airline with the right-sized aircraft to provide service to either of 

the two destinations mentioned in the plan. 

We appreciate the opportunity that the Small Community Air Service Development 

Program provides for communities like ours. Please call if 1 can be of fiirther assistance. 

Sincerely, , /) ^ 

Kitty Pifercy 0 

Mayor 

isi'-. pcii.'e; I-- 'TV'ie •'•' '-''iV-r poM co^i-iirn^r f-crvduCi 'ibei
MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST III
                  MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING III, L.P.
                      COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO
        COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED SECURITIES DISTRIBUTIONS

                              For the Period January 16, 1998 to March 27, 1998
                             ---------------------------------------------------
                               Merrill Lynch Preferred   Merrill Lynch Preferred
                                  Capital Trust III         Funding III, L.P.
                               -----------------------   -----------------------

Earnings                              $11,134,031              $13,051,420
                                      ===========              ===========

Fixed charges                         $     --                 $     --

Preferred securities distribution
  requirements                         10,800,000               11,134,031
                                      -----------              -----------

Total combined fixed charges and
  preferred securities distributions  $10,800,000              $11,134,031
                                      ===========              ===========

Ratio of earnings to combined
  fixed charges and preferred
  securities distributions                   1.03                     1.17
```

[Federal Register Volume 79, Number 104 (Friday, May 30, 2014)]
[Notices]
[Page 31125]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2014-12577]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

Announcement of Requirements and Registration for the National 
Radiological and Nuclear Detection Challenge; Correction

AGENCY: Domestic Nuclear Detection Office, DHS.

ACTION: Notice; amendment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Authority: 15 U.S.C. 3719.

SUMMARY: DNDO published a notice in the Federal Register of May 8, 
2013, to announce the National Radiological and Nuclear Detection 
Challenge (Rad/Nuc Challenge), a participation challenge being 
conducted under the America Competes Reauthorization Act, for state, 
local, and tribal law enforcement, other first responders, public 
safety officials, and Civil Support Team members. This event was 
postponed and a correction was published in the Federal Register of 
July 30, 2013. This event has now been cancelled requiring an 
additional amendment to the original notice.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Timothy Smith, (202) 254-7297, 
Radnucchallenge@hq.dhs.gov.

Amendment

    Amend FR Doc. 2013-10928 as follows:
    On May 8, 2013, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Domestic 
Nuclear Detection Office (DNDO), announced the National Radiological 
and Nuclear Detection Challenge (Rad/Nuc Challenge), a participation 
challenge authorized under 15 U.S.C. 3719(c)(3), for state, local, and 
tribal law enforcement, other first responders, public safety 
officials, and Civil Support Team members. In lieu of hosting a 
separate standalone Rad/Nuc Challenge, DNDO will work with the Urban 
Area Security Initiative competition, Urban Shield, to incorporate a 
radiological and nuclear detection competitive exercise. This notice 
formally cancels the Rad/Nuc Challenge.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The purpose of the Rad/Nuc Challenge was to 
increase proficiency, improve Concepts of Operations, and promote 
proper use of radiological and nuclear detection equipment by state and 
local agencies in support of the domestic radiological and nuclear 
detection mission to prevent the illicit use and/or movement of 
radioactive materials within the United States. By integrating into 
existing competitive exercises like Urban Shield, DNDO will provide a 
similar competitive exercise format that will continue to promote the 
radiological and nuclear detection mission.
    DNDO will provide announcements on opportunities to participate in 
competitive radiological and nuclear detection exercises to a community 
distribution list.
    To be added to the email distribution list for radiological and 
nuclear detection competitive event announcements, or for additional 
information, please contact Timothy Smith, DHS, DNDO, by email at 
radnucchallenge@hq.dhs.gov.

    Dated: April 25, 2014.
Huban A. Gowadia,
Director, Domestic Nuclear Detection Office.
[FR Doc. 2014-12577 Filed 5-29-14; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 9110-9D-P
```
Case No. 8,993.

#### MALLORY et al. v. RAHMER.

[8 Blatchf. 556, note.] 1

Circuit Court, S. D. New York.

Nov. 3, 1871.

Patexts — Men's Hats — Metal Frame — Ixfhixgf.-mext.

[In 8 Blatchf. 556. this case is published as a note to Mallory v. White, Case No. 8,993.]

[This was a suit in the same court, by the same plaintiffs, George Mallory and the Mallory Manufacturing Company, against Charles L. Rahmer, on final hearing, on pleadings and proofs, as in Case No. 8,993. The same decree was accordingly entered in the two cases.]

George Gifford and Solomon J. Gordon, for plaintiffs.

Horace Barnard, for defendant

BLATCHFORD, District Judge.

I have carefully reviewed the proofs and arguments on which this case was heard, and see no reason to change the views which I expressed in the case of the same plaintiffs against George W. White, on the same patent, or to refrain from giving effect to the stipulation of the parties, of May 13th, 1870. Let a decree be entered for the plaintiffs, to the like effect as in the case against White.
No. 64808.

#### Elmer Little *&*Sons, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 59/30285 (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

The protest was dismissed.