alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### Hendricks *vs.*McDaniel, governor.

On the trial of a claim case, evidence that the sheriff went to the land levied on, found certain persons in possession of it, and asked whether or not it was their land, to which they replied that it was not, that they had rented it from the defendant in *fi. fa.,*and that it belonged to her, was not admissible to show title in such defendant.

February 13, 1888.

Claims. Evidence. Title. Before Judge Smith. Muscogee superior court. May term, 1887.

Reported in the decision.

Goetchius & Chappell, for plaintiff in error.

J. H. Worrill, solicitor-general, and Peabody, Bran-non & Battle, *contra.*

Blandford, Justice.

In this case, it appears that Amanda Andrews became the surety of a certain person for his forthcoming to answer to a criminal charge. The bond was estreated, and a final judgment of forfeiture taken in behalf of the gover*103nor against Amanda Andrews, as surety. The judgment was levied upon a certain lot of land in the city of Columbus; and Ella N. Hendricks, the plaintiff in error here, interposed a claim to the property. Upon the trial of the claim case, the sheriff was introduced, and testified that he went to this land and found certain persons in possession of it, and asked whether it was their land or not, and they said it was not, that they had rented it from Amanda Andrews, the defendant in execution, and that the land belonged to her. Claimant’s counsel objected to this testimony upon the ground that it was illegal; that the possession of Amanda Andrews could not be proved in that way; that the title could not be proved by the sayings of the parties in possession that Amanda Andrews owned the land. The court overruled the objection and allowed the evidence. The jury found the property subject; and the claimant moved for a new trial, which the court refused, and the claimant excepted.

We are of the opinion that the court ought not to have admitted this testimony for the purpose for which it was admitted. We do not think that the sayings of parties in possession proved that Amanda Andrews herself was in possession. While such statements would bind those parties as to any interest they had in the land, they were clearly inadmissible in this case to show the title of Amanda Andrews to the land. This testimony may have materially damaged the claimant. The claimant put in a deed from Amanda Andrews to her, made before the forfeiture ; and claimed that she was a *bona fide*purchaser. This deed was assailed by-the plaintiff in execution upon the ground that it was fraudulent; and upon the trial of the issue of whether the deed was fraudulent or not, these sayings of the tenants may have had a very powerful influence with the jury, as showing that Amanda Andrews was in possession after the deed was made, as a badge of fraud; but we do not think this testimony ought to have been admitted for the purpose for which it was admitted; *104and we think that on account of this error of the court a new trial should be granted. The judgment is therefore reversed.
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

         I, William Scigliano, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB/A of IQ
Biometrix, Inc.;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

         4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

                  a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;

                  b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

                  c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case
of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

         5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions):

                  a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

                  b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 31, 2004





/s/ William Scigliano
---------------------------
William Scigliano
Chief Executive Officer
January 23, 1964

Reap. Dec. 10672.

reappraisement R62/988.1, etc.

#### Advance Brokers, Ltd. *v.*United States,

Reappraisements dismissed December 6, 1963.

’Entered a.t

Boston, Mass. (Not published.) Motion by plaintiff.
Untitled Page


		

		

		Exhibit 10.1

			

		

		
			TERMINATION AGREEMENT

		

		            Reference is hereby made to a Securities Subscription Agreement (“Agreement”) dated June 13, 2007 by and between  China Properties Developments, Inc., a Colorado corporation, and Shaanxi Xinyuan Real Estate Co. Ltd., a People’s Republic of China limited liability corporation.

		            1.     Pursuant to Section 7 of the Agreement, it is hereby agreed by the undersigned parties that the Agreement is hereby terminated and abandoned as of June 1, 2008, and as a result, the Agreement is deemed void and of no further effect.  It is further agreed that none of the parties thereto shall have any further liability or obligations thereunder except as otherwise provided therein.

		            2.     This Termination Agreement may be executed by the parties hereto in one or more counterparts each of which shall be an original and all of which shall together constitute one and the same agreement.

		            IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Termination Agreement as of the date indicated below. 

			

			

			Dated:  June 23, 2008                                                  CHINA PROPERTIES DEVELOPMENTS, INC.

			

			

			                                                                                    by:        /s/ Ping’an Wu

			                                                                                    Name:  Ping’an Wu

			                                                                                    Title:     Chief Executive Officer

			

			

			                                                                                    SHAANXI XINYUAN REAL ESTATE CO. LTD.

			

			

			                                                                                    by:        /s/ Shuzhen Yang

			                                                                                    Name:  Shuzhen Yang

			                                                                                    Title:     President
##### 



EXHIBIT 99(b)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of Northland Cable
Television, Inc. and Subsidiary (the Company) on Form 10Q/A for the
period ended September 30, 2001 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q/A), I, Gary Jones,
President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;



| | (1) |  | The Form 10-Q/A fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13 (a) or (15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78(d)); and   
| | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Form 10-Q/A
fairly presents in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 8, 2002

| |  |     |  |                                                                     
| |  | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | BY: |  | /s/ GARY S. JONES                                                   
| |  |     |  |                                                                     
| |  |     |  | Gary S. Jones
President
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                               SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Wherify Wireless, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.


June 26, 2006                             /s/ Timothy Neher
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Timothy Neher, Chief Executive Officer
                                          (Principal Executive Officer)
# C_2017382EN.01006101.xml

| 13.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 382/61 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 382/61

---

Order of the General Court of 13 September 2017 — Omnicom International Holdings v EUIPO — eBay (dA/tA/bA/y)

(Case T-393/16) (1)

1

(2017/C 382/75)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Eight Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 364, 3.10.2016.

1

---
FLEXSTEEL INDUSTRIES EXHIBIT 10.2







Exhibit 10.3



 


AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


 


This Amendment to Employment Agreement is made and entered into this 27th day of June, 2008, by and between FLEXSTEEL INDUSTRIES, INC., a Minnesota corporation (hereafter “Employer”) and DONALD D. DREHER, (hereafter “Employee”).


 


RECITALS


 


WHEREAS, Employer and Employee executed an Employment Agreement (“Agreement”) dated October 1, 2006; and


 





	
             
 	
            WHEREAS, the Employer and Employee wish to amend the Agreement.
 





 


NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual terms, covenants and conditions herein contained, the parties agree as follows:


 





	
             
 	
            1.
 	
            Section 1. EMPLOYMENT. Paragraph B of the Agreement is deleted and replaced with the following:
 






 





	
             
 	
            B.
 	
            Employee will consult with the CEO of Flexsteel Industries, Inc. and use his best efforts to establish a timeline for the identification and hiring of a successor for Employee.
 






 





	
             
 	
            2.
 	
            Section 2. TERM. Two (2) references to December 31, 2009 are amended to September 30, 2012.
 






 





	
             
 	
            3.
 	
            Section 8. COMPENSATION UPON TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT.
 






 





	
             
 	
            a.
 	
            Paragraph A. December 1, 2009 is amended to September 1, 2012.
 









	
             
 	
            b.
 	
            Paragraph A. (i) December 31, 2009 is amended to September 30, 2012.
 






 





	
             
 	
            4.
 	
            In all other respects, the Agreement is hereby ratified and confirmed.
 






 


 





	
            EMPLOYEE
 	
             
 	
            FLEXSTEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.
 
	
            /s/ Donald D. Dreher  
 	
             
 	
            By:
 	
            
 /s/ R.J. Klosterman
 
	
             
 	
             
 	
             
 
	
            Donald D. Dreher
 	
             
 	
            R. J. Klosterman, CEO and President
 





 


 


 




1
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

For purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Roger K. Brooks, the Chairman
of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer of AmerUs Group Co. (the
Company), hereby certifies that:

|     |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
|---- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(i)  |  | the Quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter
ended June 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Commission Act of 1934; and
|     |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
|(ii) |  | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.                                                                                                                                              

/s/ Roger K. BrooksRoger K. Brooks
Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer
AmerUs Group Co.

Dated: August 13, 2003

52
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NILSON EDUARDO GONZALEZVASQUEZ, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 18-70870 

Agency No. A205-524-782 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 14, 2023**

Before: FERNANDEZ, FRIEDLAND, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Nilson Eduardo Gonzalez-Vasquez, a native and citizen of El Salvador,

petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order 

dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his 

applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

FEB 22 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 18-70870 

Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1252. We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

In his opening brief, Gonzalez-Vasquez does not challenge, and therefore 

forfeits, the BIA’s adverse credibility determination. See Lopez-Vasquez v. 

Holder, 706 F.3d 1072, 1079-80 (9th Cir. 2013). Gonzalez-Vasquez also forfeits

any challenge to the denial of CAT protection. Thus, we deny the petition for 

review as to his asylum, withholding of removal, and CAT claims.

We do not consider Gonzalez-Vasquez’s claims based on particular social 

groups of returnees or witnesses to crimes because the BIA did not decide these

issues, see Santiago-Rodriguez v. Holder, 657 F.3d 820, 829 (9th Cir. 2011) 

(review limited to the grounds relied on by the BIA), and Gonzalez-Vasquez does 

not contend the BIA erred in finding that these claims were not properly before it, 

see Lopez-Vasquez, 706 F.3d at 1079-80.

We lack jurisdiction to consider Gonzalez-Vasquez’s contention that the IJ 

violated his due process rights because he did not raise it before the BIA. See 

Barron v. Ashcroft, 358 F.3d 674, 677-78 (9th Cir. 2004) (court lacks jurisdiction 

to review claims not presented to the agency).

PETITON FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
Exhibit 32.2

Statement of Chief Financial Officer Furnished Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The undersigned, Gary F. Hoskins, is the Chief Financial Officer of Citizens South Banking Corporation (the Company).

This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the Company of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 (the Report).

By execution of this statement, I certify that to the best of my knowledge:

| | A) | the Report   fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the   Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and                                                               
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
| | B) | the   information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,   the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the   dates and for the periods covered by the Report.

|November 7,   2006 | /s/ Gary F.   Hoskins    
|------------------ | -------------------------
|Dated              |                          
|                   | Gary F.   Hoskins        
|                   | Chief   Financial Officer

This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  It is not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Citizens South Banking Corporation and will be retained by Citizens South Banking Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 87-3 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 1 of 18
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 87-3 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 2 of 18
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 87-3 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 3 of 18
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 87-3 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 4 of 18
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 87-3 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 5 of 18
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 87-3 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 6 of 18
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 87-3 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 7 of 18
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 87-3 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 8 of 18
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 87-3 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 9 of 18
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 87-3 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 10 of 18
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 87-3 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 11 of 18
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 87-3 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 12 of 18
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 87-3 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 13 of 18
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 87-3 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 14 of 18
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 87-3 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 15 of 18
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 87-3 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 16 of 18
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 87-3 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 17 of 18
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 87-3 Filed 08/11/2006 Page 18 of 18