alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 2:02-cv-20130-HB Document 4-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 1 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20130-HB Document 4-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 2 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20130-HB Document 4-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 3 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20130-HB Document 4-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 4 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20130-HB Document 4-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 5 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20130-HB Document 4-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 6 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20130-HB Document 4-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 7 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20130-HB Document 4-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 8 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20130-HB Document 4-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 9 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20130-HB Document 4-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 10 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20130-HB Document 4-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 11 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20130-HB Document 4-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 12 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20130-HB Document 4-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 13 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20130-HB Document 4-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 14 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20130-HB Document 4-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 15 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20130-HB Document 4-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 16 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20130-HB Document 4-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 17 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20130-HB Document 4-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 18 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20130-HB Document 4-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 19 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20130-HB Document 4-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 20 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20130-HB Document 4-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 21 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20130-HB Document 4-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 22 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20130-HB Document 4-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 23 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20130-HB Document 4-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 24 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20130-HB Document 4-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 25 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20130-HB Document 4-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 26 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20130-HB Document 4-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 27 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20130-HB Document 4-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 28 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20130-HB Document 4-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 29 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 175 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 175 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 175 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 175 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 4 of 4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

FRANKLIN STRATEGIC INCOME

FUND, ET AL : CIVIL ACTION

:

: NO. 02-4292

 VS. : 

:

JOHN J. RIGAS, ET AL

 ORDER

AND NOW, this 6th of AUGUST, 2002, it is hereby, 

 ORDERED that the above captioned case is reassigned from the

calendar of the Honorable Berle M. Schiller to the Honorable Herbert J. Hutton,

as related to Civil Action No. 02-4086.

FOR THE COURT:

 

JAMES T. GILES

Chief Judge

ATTEST:

 

MICHAEL E. KUNZ

Clerk of Court

Case 2:02-cv-04292-HH Document 4 Filed 08/06/2002 Page 1 of 1
# C_2018436EN.01003702.xml

| 3.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 436/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.12.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 436/37

---

Judgment of the General Court of 18 October 2018 — GEA Group v Commission

(Case T-640/16) (1)

((Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Heat stabilisers - Decision establishing an infringement of Article 81 EC - Decision amending the initial decision - Action for annulment - Interest in bringing proceedings - Admissibility - Fines - 10 % ceiling - Group of companies - Equal treatment))

(2018/C 436/52)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: GEA Group AG (Düsseldorf, Germany) (represented by: I. du Mont and C. Wagner, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Rossi, A. Biolan and V. Bottka, Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Commission Decision C(2016) 3920 final of 29 June 2016 amending Commission Decision C(2009) 8682 final of 11 November 2009 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/38589 — Heat stabilisers).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Commission Decision C(2016) 3920 final of 29 June 2016 amending Commission Decision C(2009) 8682 final of 11 November 2009 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/38589 — Heat stabilisers); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Commission Decision C(2016) 3920 final of 29 June 2016 amending Commission Decision C(2009) 8682 final of 11 November 2009 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 [EC] and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/38589 — Heat stabilisers);

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 392, 24.10.2016.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

KATHERINE LIGHT : CIVIL ACTION

 vs. :

 

HOTLINE TELECOMMUNICATIONS, :

SEUNG JO KWAK

: NO. 02-4357

NOTICE OF ARBITRATION HEARING

Please take note that the above-captioned civil action case has been rescheduled for

ARBITRATION at 9:30 am on Thursday, March 13, 2003*. PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS

ARBITRATION HEARING WILL BE HELD IN THE ROBERT N.C. NIX BUILDING, 900

MARKET ST., PHILADELPHIA, PA 19107. REPORT TO ROOM 339 FOR YOUR ROOM

ASSIGNMENT. NOTE: Arbitrators shall not participate in settlement discussions.

Michael E. Kunz

Clerk of Court

*Case continued from January 10, 2003

NO FURTHER CONTINUANCES

WILL BE GRANTED WITHOUT

COURT APPROVAL* By: 

ADRIENNE MANN for 

STEVE SONNIE

Deputy Clerk

Phone:267-299-7074

Date:January 7, 2003

Copies: Harry Grace, Courtroom Deputy to Judge Savage 

Docket Clerk - Case File

Counsel: Peter N. Munsing, Esq.

Alan S. Battisti, Esq.

Arbitrators:

ARB2.FRM

Case 2:02-cv-04357-TJS Document 19 Filed 01/07/2003 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

 

IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS, INC. : 

 : Civil Action No. 04-CV-2735 

 Plaintiff, : 

v. : 

DAVID RUPERT, : 

 Defendant/ : 

 Counterclaim : 

 Plaintiff, : 

 : 

 v. : 

 : 

IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS, INC., : 

MATTHEW J. ESPE, and : 

BETH SEXTON, : 

 : 

 Counterclaim : 

 Defendants. : 

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41

 The parties hereto, being all the parties of record, hereby stipulate to the dismissal 

with prejudice of the claims and counterclaims asserted in this action, each party to bear 

its own costs. 

BY THE PARTIES: 

/s Timothy T. Myers /s Steven E. Bizar 

Timothy T. Myers, Esquire Steven E. Bizar, Esquire 

Elliott Greenleaf & Siedzikowski, P.C. Buchanan Ingersoll PC 

Union Meeting Corporate Center V 1835 Market Street, 14th Floor 

925 Harvest Drive Philadelphia, PA 19103 

Blue Bell, PA 19422 

Attorneys for Plaintiff and Attorneys for Defendant and 

Counterclaim Defendants Counterclaim Plaintiff 

DATED: September 15, 2004 

Case 2:04-cv-02735-WY Document 5 Filed 09/15/04 Page 1 of 1
|   | (1) | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                           |                                                                                                                |                                     |
|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|
| June                  26, 2006 |                                                                                                           | /s/ Mark                  E. Gitter |
|                           | Mark                  E. Gitter, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer (Principal                  Accounting Officer) |

----
# C_2017382EN.01004202.xml

| 13.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 382/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 382/42

---

Judgment of the General Court of 26 September 2017 — Hanschmann v Europol

(Case T-562/16) (1)

1

((Civil Service - Europol - Non-renewal of a contract - Refusal to award a contract for an indefinite period - Compensation - Annulment by the Civil Service Tribunal - Enforcement of the judgments in Cases F 27/09 and F 104/12))

(2017/C 382/51)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Ingo Hanschmann (Taucha, Germany) (represented by: W. Dammingh and N. Dane, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Cooperation (represented by: D. Neumann and C. Falmagne, acting as Agents, and D. Waelbroeck, A. Duron and I.Antypas, lawyers)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought under Article 270 TFEU, seeking annulment of the decision of Europol of 29 July 2014 not to renew for an indefinite period the contract awarded to the applicant and to allocate a sum of EUR 10 000 to him on account of the length of the procedure and the prolongation of his state of uncertainty and annulment of the decision rejecting his complaint.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Ingo Hanschmann to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Ingo Hanschmann to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 354, 26.10.2015 (case initially registered before the European Union Civil Service Tribunal under Case No F-119/15 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1 September 2016).

1

---
April 13, 1965

Reap. Dec. 10953.

#### Oscar E. Eggen (American Express Co.) et al. *v.*United States,

REHEARING MOTION DENIED

Entered at Los Angeles, Calif. Reap. Dec. 10901, decision on rehearing of Reap. Dec. 10013. Motion by defendant.
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1458 

To establish a grant program to incentivize States to reduce prison 

populations, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 28, 2017 

Mr. BOOKER (for himself and Mr. BLUMENTHAL) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary 

A BILL 

To establish a grant program to incentivize States to reduce 

prison populations, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Reverse Mass Incarcer5 ation Act of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. GRANT PROGRAM. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Title I of the Omnibus Crime 

8 Control and Safe Street Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3711 et 

9 seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following: 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1458 IS

1 ‘‘PART MM—STATE PRISON POPULATION 

2 REDUCTION GRANT PROGRAM 

3 ‘‘SEC. 3031. GRANT PROGRAM. 

4 ‘‘(a) IN GENERAL.—The Attorney General may make 

5 grants to States to assist States in reducing crime rates 

6 and incarcerations. 

7 ‘‘(b) ELIGIBILITY.—A State shall be eligible to re8 ceive a grant under this section if the State demonstrates 

9 that, during the 3-year period preceding the application 

10 for a grant under this section— 

11 ‘‘(1) the total number of individuals incarcer12 ated in correctional or detention facilities in the 

13 State was reduced by not less than 7 percent; and 

14 ‘‘(2) the rate of crime within the State did not 

15 increase by more than 3 percent. 

16 ‘‘(c) APPLICATION.—An eligible State seeking a 

17 grant under this section shall submit to the Attorney Gen18 eral an application in such form and manner and at such 

19 time as the Attorney General requires, which shall include 

20 a clear methodology based on population size and other 

21 factors. 

22 ‘‘(d) USE OF GRANT FUNDS.—A grant awarded 

23 under this section shall be used by a State to implement 

24 evidence-based programs designed to reduce crime rates 

25 and incarcerations.’’. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1458 IS

1 (b) AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS.—Section 

2 1001(a) of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe 

3 Streets Act of 1968 (42 U.S.C. 3793(a)) is amended by 

4 adding at the end the following: 

5 ‘‘(28) There are authorized to be appropriated to 

6 carry out part MM $2,000,000,000 for each of fiscal years 

7 2018 through 2027.’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 32.1

               Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      As Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002

In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of GSV, Inc. (the  "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2006 (the  "Report"),  I, Gilad Gat, Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant
to  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the  requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.


By:/s/ Gilad Gat
   ----------------------------
   Gilad Gat
   Chief Executive Officer
   Chief Financial Officer
   August 14, 2006
February 26, 1948

No. 52205.

protests 111801-K and 114502-K.

#### Kerr-Gifford & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Abstract 52129. Motion of Government for rehearing granted.
Exhibit 8.1

|Significant Subsidiaries          |  | Country of
Operation |  | Issued and
fully paid
share capital* |  | Proportion
of capital
held |  | Nature of business/activity           
|--------------------------------- |  | -------------------- |  | ------------------------------------ |  | -------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------
|
|1. Gala Group Investments Limited |  | UK                   |  | 3,070,115,060                        |  | 100%                       |  | Intermediate holding company          
|2. Gala Group Finance Limited     |  | UK                   |  | 2                                    |  | 100%                       |  | Intermediate holding company          
|3. Gala Holdings Limited          |  | UK                   |  | 229,486,661                          |  | 100%                       |  | Intermediate holding company          
|4. Gala Casinos Limited           |  | UK                   |  | 117,300,011                          |  | 100%                       |  | Casino holding and trading company    
|5. Gala Leisure Limited           |  | UK                   |  | 100                                  |  | 100%                       |  | Bingo trading and head office services
|6. Gala Interactive Limited       |  | UK                   |  | 2                                    |  | 100%                       |  | Online bingo and casino               
|7. Eventday Limited               |  | UK                   |  | 100                                  |  | 100%                       |  | Casino holding company                

---

---

QuickLinks
on

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ANDREA CONSTAND, r ie
CIVIL ACTION NO. 05-1099 ~
Plaintiff,
v. : Judge Eduardo C, Robreno
WILLIAM H. COSBY, JR,
(Original Action)
Defendant,
ANDREA CONSTAND, . rm
CIVIL ACTION NO. 06-483 ~¥ w
Plaintiff, .
Judge Eduardo C. Robreno

(Consolidated for Discovery)
MARTIN D. SINGER et al.,

Defendants,

STIPULATION OF CONFIDENTIALITY

WHEREAS the Court in the original action, Constand v. Cosby, Civ. A. No. 05-1099,
issued a case management order preserving the confidentiality of certain discovery materials;

WHEREAS the Court consolidated the original action with the second-filed action,
Constand v. Singer et al., Civ. A. No, 06-483, for purposes of discovery;

WHEREAS Defendants in the second-filed action, Martin Singer and The National
Enquirer, require access to the confidential discovery taken and exchanged in the original action;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and AGREED as follows:

1 The parties in the original action shall make available all discovery taken and
exchanged in the original action to the Defendants in the second-filed action, Martin Singer and

The Nationa! Enquirer, in a mutually convenient manner;

lan
cd



2 The Defendants in the second-filed action, Martin Singer and The National

Enquirer, shall maintain and preserve the confidentiality of the discovery they receive and abide

by the terms of Court’s original order governing confidentiality of the discovery materials; and

3. This Stipulation is made by Plaintiff without prejudice to her right to continue to

oppose the confidentiality order.

Bebe/H. Kivitz
Trojani/Kivitz LLP
38 N, Waterloo Road
Devon, PA 19333

Attorneys for Plaintiff Andrea Constand

(Aatit, Peorene

Patrick J. O’Céahor
George M. Gowen, JIT
Cozen.O’Connor
1900 Market Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103

Andrew D. Schau

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler, LLP
1133 Avenue of the Americas

New York, NY 10036

Attorneys for Defendant William H.
Cosby lr.

J. Ge)

Conrad O'Bher Gellman & Rota, P.C.
1515 Market Street, 16th Floor
Philadelphia, PA 19102

Martin Singer

Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
1701 Market Street
Philadelphia, PA 19103

Attorneys for Defendant The National
Enquirer

niwtd
Tey Ole

SG

i

Vy
(ae. TM


IT IS SO ORDERED.

‘ .

DATED: * 4244 _12-_, 2006 By the Court: vic
Y . =

io 4
Thomay’J. Rueter
United States District Court

> MJ
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

MIDDLE DISTRICT 

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, 

 Respondent 

 v. 

SEBASTIAN ENRIQUE OLMEDA, 

 Petitioner 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 221 MAL 2015 

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

AND NOW, this 29th day of October, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

is DENIED.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 215 (Wednesday, November 8, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 77107-77108]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-24812]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[USITC SE-23-054]


Sunshine Act Meetings

AGENCY HOLDING THE MEETING: United States International Trade 
Commission.

TIME AND DATE: November 17, 2023 at 11 a.m.

PLACE: Room 101, 500 E Street SW, Washington, DC 20436, Telephone: 
(202) 205-2000.

STATUS: Open to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 
    1. Agendas for future meetings: none.
    2. Minutes.
    3. Ratification List.
    4. Commission vote on Inv. Nos 701-TA-695-698 and 731-TA-1643-1657 
(Preliminary) (Aluminum Extrusions from China, Colombia, Dominican 
Republic, Ecuador, India, Indonesia, Italy, Malaysia, Mexico, South 
Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, and Vietnam). 
The Commission currently is scheduled to complete and file its 
determinations on November 20, 2023; views of the Commission currently 
are scheduled to be completed and filed on November 28, 2023.
    5. Outstanding action jackets: none.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Sharon Bellamy, Supervisory 
Hearings and Information Officer, 202-205-2000.
    The Commission is holding the meeting under the Government in the

[[Page 77108]]

Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552(b). In accordance with Commission policy, 
subject matter listed above, not disposed of at the scheduled meeting, 
may be carried over to the agenda of the following meeting.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: November 6, 2023.
Sharon Bellamy,
Supervisory Hearings and Information Officer.
[FR Doc. 2023-24812 Filed 11-6-23; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
No. 66283.

#### The Huffman Manufacturing Company *v.*United States,

protest 60/2122 (San Francisco).

*397Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Schmidt Pritchard & Co. et al.*(47 C.C.P.A. 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Case 2:05-cv-02330-CMR Document 516 Filed 09/03/09 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:05-cv-02330-CMR Document 516 Filed 09/03/09 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:05-cv-02330-CMR Document 516 Filed 09/03/09 Page 3 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MARIA C., a minor by and : CIVIL ACTION

through her parent and natural :

guardian, IRIS NEREIDA CAMACHO :

and IRIS NEREIDA CAMACHO :

:

v. :

:

THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF :

PHILADELPHIA : NO. 02-4336

 ORDER

AND NOW, this day of July, 2004, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to 

Proceed In Forma Pauperis is GRANTED.

BY THE COURT:

______________________

Fullam, Sr. J.

Case 2:02-cv-04336-JF Document 39 Filed 07/27/2004 Page 1 of 1
No. 56362.

petition 6831-R (Minneapolis) .

#### The Kildall Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

From the testimony it appeared that the secretary-treasurer of petitioner discussed the entry of the merchandise with the appraiser at Minneapolis; that the merchandise was appraised at the value at which it was offered for sale in usual wholesale quantities to all purchasers in the United States; and that since the petitioner did not agree to that value, it decided to set up this case as a test case. Upon the record presented it was hold that there was no intention to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the case or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore granted.
No. 63010.

#### George Kovacs *v.*United States,

protest 58/3685 (New York).

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

Since the protest was filed more than 60 days after liquidation, it was dismissed as untimely, by virtue of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.
Exhibit-32.1 -- Certification per Sarbanes-Oxley Act (Section 906)

The undersigned, Tommy J. Gropp, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, of Shiprock, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)  the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of the Company for the year ended
     December 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
     Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
     U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d); and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

Dated:  April 9, 2004

                                           /s/ Tommy J. Gropp
                                           ------------------------
                                               Tommy J. Gropp
                                               Chief Executive Officer
                                               Chief Financial Officer