alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Artis Charles Harrell v. Jerome Godinich, Jr.

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 6

- 00 338

- CV

Trial court case number: 20 1 4

- 6 3129

Trial court: 1 9 0 th District Court of Harris County

Appellant, Artis Charles Harrell, has filed a notice of appeal of the trial court’s order of

dismissal and a n affidavit of inability to pay costs on appeal

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 20.1(a)(2), ( c)(1), (d). The clerk’s record on indigence reflects that, on April 28, 2016, t he d istrict c lerk timely filed a contest to the affidavit. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 20.1(e) (1)

. T he trial court , therefore, was required to conduct a hearing or sign an order extending the time to conduct the hearing by May 9 , 201 6

. S ee T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 4.1, 20.1(i)(2) , (3)

. And t o properly sustain the contest, the trial court was required to sign an order no later than May 9, 2016, t he date on which the contest was set for a hearing by submission

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 20.1(i)(4)

. Th e trial court sign ed the

order sustaining the contest on May 10, 2016

. Accordingly , the allegations in the affidavit are deemed true, and appellant is entitled to proceed without adv ance payment of costs. See T EX

. R.

A PP

. P. 20.1(i)(4) ; In re G.C. , 22 S.W.3d 932, 932

– 33 (Tex. 2000) (concluding

, bec ause trial court did not sign order sustaining indigence contest or extending time for hearing within ten days after contest filed, rule deem ed allegations in affidavit of indigence as true, and authorize d appellant to proceed with appeal without prepayment of costs )

.

The Clerk of this Court is directed to make an entry in this Court’s records that appell ant is indigent and allowed to proceed on appeal without advance payment of costs.

Although the district clerk filed a clerk’s record on indigence, the clerk has not filed a clerk’s record for the appellate record. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 34.1, 34.5(a), 35.1, 35.3(a)(2). Accordingly, the district clerk is directed to file with this Court, within 30 days of the date of this order and at no cost to appellant, a clerk’s record containing the items specified in Texas Rule of Appellate Procedu re 34.5(a) and any additional items requested by any
party

. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 20.1(k) , 34.5(a), (b)

.

T he court reporter has filed an information sheet indicating that there is no reporter’s record in this appeal

.Appellant’s brief is due within 30 days after the date the clerk’s record is filed in this

Court. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6(a).

Finally, appellant has filed a motion asking the Court to order the district clerk to forward the clerk’s record on indigency to this Court and forward a copy of that clerk’s record to appellant. Because the district clerk has filed the clerk’s record on indigency in this Court and appellant may proceed without advance payment of costs, we dismiss appellant’s motion as

moot

.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Terry Jennings

 Acting individually

Date: July 28, 2016
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this date I caused a true and correct copy of Defendants’ Motion

to Strike Plaintiff’s Jury Demand to be served by United States Mail, First Class Service,

properly addressed and postage prepaid, upon the following:

Anita F. Alberts, Esquire

301 South Main Street

The Atrium, Suite W-2

Doylestown, PA 18901

(Attorney for Plaintiff)

 /s/Sidney L. Gold, Esquire SG1387 

SIDNEY L. GOLD, ESQUIRE

Attorney for Defendants 

DATE: September 9, 2005

Case 2:02-cv-04421-PBT Document 47-3 Filed 09/09/2005 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:05-cv-02517-SD Document 1 Filed 05/27/05 Page 1 of 46
Case 2:05-cv-02517-SD Document 1 Filed 05/27/05 Page 2 of 46
Case 2:05-cv-02517-SD Document 1 Filed 05/27/05 Page 3 of 46
Case 2:05-cv-02517-SD Document 1 Filed 05/27/05 Page 4 of 46
Case 2:05-cv-02517-SD Document 1 Filed 05/27/05 Page 5 of 46
Case 2:05-cv-02517-SD Document 1 Filed 05/27/05 Page 6 of 46
Case 2:05-cv-02517-SD Document 1 Filed 05/27/05 Page 7 of 46
Case 2:05-cv-02517-SD Document 1 Filed 05/27/05 Page 8 of 46
Case 2:05-cv-02517-SD Document 1 Filed 05/27/05 Page 9 of 46
Case 2:05-cv-02517-SD Document 1 Filed 05/27/05 Page 10 of 46
Case 2:05-cv-02517-SD Document 1 Filed 05/27/05 Page 11 of 46
Case 2:05-cv-02517-SD Document 1 Filed 05/27/05 Page 12 of 46
Case 2:05-cv-02517-SD Document 1 Filed 05/27/05 Page 13 of 46
Case 2:05-cv-02517-SD Document 1 Filed 05/27/05 Page 14 of 46
Case 2:05-cv-02517-SD Document 1 Filed 05/27/05 Page 15 of 46
Case 2:05-cv-02517-SD Document 1 Filed 05/27/05 Page 16 of 46
Case 2:05-cv-02517-SD Document 1 Filed 05/27/05 Page 17 of 46
Case 2:05-cv-02517-SD Document 1 Filed 05/27/05 Page 18 of 46
Case 2:05-cv-02517-SD Document 1 Filed 05/27/05 Page 19 of 46
Case 2:05-cv-02517-SD Document 1 Filed 05/27/05 Page 20 of 46
Case 2:05-cv-02517-SD Document 1 Filed 05/27/05 Page 21 of 46
Case 2:05-cv-02517-SD Document 1 Filed 05/27/05 Page 22 of 46
Case 2:05-cv-02517-SD Document 1 Filed 05/27/05 Page 23 of 46
Case 2:05-cv-02517-SD Document 1 Filed 05/27/05 Page 24 of 46
Case 2:05-cv-02517-SD Document 1 Filed 05/27/05 Page 25 of 46
Case 2:05-cv-02517-SD Document 1 Filed 05/27/05 Page 26 of 46
Case 2:05-cv-02517-SD Document 1 Filed 05/27/05 Page 27 of 46
Case 2:05-cv-02517-SD Document 1 Filed 05/27/05 Page 28 of 46
Case 2:05-cv-02517-SD Document 1 Filed 05/27/05 Page 29 of 46
Case 2:05-cv-02517-SD Document 1 Filed 05/27/05 Page 30 of 46
Case 2:05-cv-02517-SD Document 1 Filed 05/27/05 Page 31 of 46
Case 2:05-cv-02517-SD Document 1 Filed 05/27/05 Page 32 of 46
Case 2:05-cv-02517-SD Document 1 Filed 05/27/05 Page 33 of 46
Case 2:05-cv-02517-SD Document 1 Filed 05/27/05 Page 34 of 46
Case 2:05-cv-02517-SD Document 1 Filed 05/27/05 Page 35 of 46
Case 2:05-cv-02517-SD Document 1 Filed 05/27/05 Page 36 of 46
Case 2:05-cv-02517-SD Document 1 Filed 05/27/05 Page 37 of 46
Case 2:05-cv-02517-SD Document 1 Filed 05/27/05 Page 38 of 46
Case 2:05-cv-02517-SD Document 1 Filed 05/27/05 Page 39 of 46
Case 2:05-cv-02517-SD Document 1 Filed 05/27/05 Page 40 of 46
Case 2:05-cv-02517-SD Document 1 Filed 05/27/05 Page 41 of 46
Case 2:05-cv-02517-SD Document 1 Filed 05/27/05 Page 42 of 46
Case 2:05-cv-02517-SD Document 1 Filed 05/27/05 Page 43 of 46
Case 2:05-cv-02517-SD Document 1 Filed 05/27/05 Page 44 of 46
Case 2:05-cv-02517-SD Document 1 Filed 05/27/05 Page 45 of 46
Case 2:05-cv-02517-SD Document 1 Filed 05/27/05 Page 46 of 46
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of IQ Biometrix, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB for the period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael Walsh,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

      (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
      15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.


                                                  /s/ Michael Walsh
                                                  -----------------------------
                                                  Michael Walsh
                                                  Chief Financial Officer
February 10, 2005


                                       28
Exhibit
32





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





CERTIFICATION


By
signing below, each of the undersigned officers hereby certifies pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to his knowledge, (i) this Annual Report on Form 10-K fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in this report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
Vectren Utility Holdings, Inc.




Signed
this 28th day of February, 2008.









/s/
      Jerome A. Benkert, Jr.
            
            /s/
      Niel C. Ellerbrook(Signature
      of Authorized Officer)
            
            (Signature
      of Authorized Officer)Jerome
      A. Benkert, Jr.
            
            Niel
      C. Ellerbrook(Typed
      Name)
            
            (Typed
      Name)Executive
      Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
            
            Chairman
      and Chief Executive Officer(Title)
            
            (Title)
##### 



EXHIBIT 99(b)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northland Cable Television,
Inc. and Subsidiary (the Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended
September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Form 10-Q/A), I, Gary Jones, President of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;

| |                                                                                                                                                             
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) The Form 10-Q/A fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 (a) or (15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m or 78(d)); and   
|
| | (2) The information contained in the
Form 10-Q/A fairly presents in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Dated: November 13, 2002



| | BY: | /s/ GARY S. JONES                                                   
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     | Gary S. Jones
President
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
*Note: This disclosure must be conspicuous. This means that it should be printed in reasonably large 

typeface. If this disclosure is combined with other information, it should be set off by contrasting color, 

by surrounding it with a box, or by using other means to ensure that it is prominently featured.

Privacy Act – A Privacy Act Statement required by 5 U.S.C. § 552a(e)(3) stating our authority for 

soliciting and collecting the information from your check, and explaining the purposes and routine 

uses which will be made of your check information, is available from the Federal Register at: 

(https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2003/02/04/03-2521/privacy-act-of-1974-as-amendedsystem-of-records), or by calling toll free at (1-866-945-7920) to obtain a copy by mail. Furnishing 

the check information is voluntary, but a decision not to do so may require you to make payment 

by some other method.

Notice to Customers Making Payment by Check

When you provide a check as payment, you authorize us either to use information from your 

check to make a one-time electronic fund transfer from your account or to process the payment 

as a check transaction.
# C_2018408EN.01004601.xml

| 12.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 408/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 408/46

---

Judgment of the General Court of 25 September 2018 — GABO:mi v Commission

(Case T-10/16) (1)

((Arbitration clause - Sixth and seventh framework programmes for research, technological development and demonstration activities (2002-2006 and 2007-2013) - Letters requesting reimbursement of part of the grants awarded - Debit note - Setting off of claims - Amendment of application - Admissibility - Eligibility of expenses - Funds held in trust - Duty to record costs in contractor’s accounts - Compliance with accounting rules in the State in which the contractor is established - Legal certainty - Legitimate expectations - Good governance - Transparency - Right to be heard - Proportionality))

(2018/C 408/58)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: GABO:mi Gesellschaft für Ablauforganisation:milliarium mbH & Co. KG (Munich, Germany) (represented by: M. Ahlhaus and C. Mayer, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by: S. Delaude, S. Lejeune and M. Siekierzyńska, subsequently by S. Delaude and M. Siekierzyńska, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application, first, under Article 272 TFEU for a declaration that a claim mentioned in two information letters dated 2 December 2015 and in a debit note dated 2 December 2015 relating to a claim of EUR 1 770 417,29 does not exist and, second, under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of set-off decisions contained in seven letters dated 16 and 21 December 2015, 14 January, 26 April and 3 May 2016 seeking to offset each payment concerned against the applicant’s alleged debt and of that debit note and those information letters.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares unfounded the claim of the European Commission against GABO:mi Gesellschaft für Ablauforganisation:milliarium mbH & Co. KG mentioned in debit note No 3241514917 dated 2 December 2015 and in the two information letters dated 2 December 2015 so far as concerns the declared expenses relating to the ‘central travel/meeting budget’ and the liquidated damages relating to it; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares unfounded the claim of the European Commission against GABO:mi Gesellschaft für Ablauforganisation:milliarium mbH & Co. KG mentioned in debit note No 3241514917 dated 2 December 2015 and in the two information letters dated 2 December 2015 so far as concerns the declared expenses relating to the ‘central travel/meeting budget’ and the liquidated damages relating to it;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 111, 29.3.2016.

---
# C_2018013EN.01001601.xml

| 15.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 13/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 13/16

---

Judgment of the General Court of 23 November 2017 — PF v Commission

(Case T-617/16) (1)

1

((Civil service - Officials - Promotion - 2015 promotion exercise - Articles 43 and 45(1) of the Staff Regulations - Duty to provide a statement of reasons - Consideration of comparative merits - Use of languages in the context of the duties performed by administrators assigned to linguistic duties and by administrators assigned to non-linguistic duties - Legitimate absences - Manifest error of assessment))

(2018/C 013/26)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: PF (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Berscheid and C. Berardis-Kayser, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking annulment of the Commission’s decision not to promote the applicant to Grade AD 8 in the 2015 promotion exercise.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders PF to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders PF to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 371, 10.10.2016 (Case initially registered before the European Union Civil Service Tribunal as Case F-47/16 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1 September 2016).

1

---
# C_2015171EN.01002901.xml

| 26.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/29

---

Action brought on 16 March 2015 — Unicorn v OHIM — Mercilink Equipment Leasing (UNICORN-čerpací stanice)

(Case T-123/15)

(2015/C 171/34)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Unicorn a.s. (Prague, Czech Republic) (represented by: L. Lorenc, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Mercilink Equipment Leasing Ltd (Limassol, Cyprus)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Applicant: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant:

Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘UNICORN-čerpací stanice’ — Community trade mark No 11 014 685

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before OHIM:

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 13 January 2015 in Case R 153/2014-5

Contested decision:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the contested decision;

| — | Order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | OHIM did not properly take into consideration evidence submitted by the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

OHIM did not properly take into consideration evidence submitted by the applicant;

| — | OHIM incorrectly considered good reputation of the earlier trademarks. |
| --- | --- |

—

OHIM incorrectly considered good reputation of the earlier trademarks.

---
January 4, 1944

No. 49105.

Suit 4436.

#### *United States*v. *E. W. J. Hearty, Inc.*

C. D. 724. affirmed. C. A. D. 257.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

NILS JOHANNESSEN :

: CIVIL ACTION

v. :

: NO. 04-3791

SULZER MEDICA USA, INC., ET AL. :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 20 day of May, 2009, upon consideration of the Motion of th

Defendants Sulzer Medica, Inc., Centerpulse, Inc., and Zimmer Holdings, Inc., for Summary

Judgment (Doc. No. 46) and Plaintiff Nils Johannessen’s Memorandum of Law in Opposition to

Zimmer’s Motion for Summary Judgement and in Support of his Motion for Partial Summary

Judgment Against Zimmer Holdings, Inc., Sulzer Medica USA, Inc., and Centerpulse USA, Inc. 

(Doc. No. 47), and all documents submitted in support thereof and in opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED as follows:

1. Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 46) is GRANTED.

2. Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 47) is DENIED.

3. The Second Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 37) is DISMISSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT:

_________________________

R. Barclay Surrick, J.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

TROY SLEMMER, et al. : CIVIL ACTION

:

 v. :

:

MCCARTHY MASONRY : NO. 02-4349

& CONCRETE, INC. et al :

ORDER

AND NOW, this ___ day of May, 2003, the parties having

represented to this court that they had resolved this matter, it

is hereby ORDERED that this matter is SETTLED, DISCONTINUED, AND

ENDED.

This court retains jurisdiction to enforce the terms of

the settlement agreement.

BY THE COURT:

________________________

JAMES T. GILES C.J.

copies by FAX on

to

Case 2:02-cv-04349-JG Document 19 Filed 05/29/2003 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Certification of Nevada Classic Thoroughbreds, Inc.  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  regarding Annual Report on Form 10-KSB  for the year ended June 30, 2013**

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title  18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Nevada Classic  Thoroughbreds, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), doeshereby certify that, based upon her knowledge:

1. The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended    June 30, 2013 (the "Form 10-KSB") fully complies with the    requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. Information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of  the Company.

> 
 

| Dated: September 30, 2013 | By: /s/ Brad Brimhall                                   |
|---------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------|
|                      |                                                         |
|                      | Brad Brimhall                                           |
|                      | Chief Accounting Officer/Acting Chief Financial Officer |

>
Exhibit 32.1

                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  each  of  the  undersigned   officers  of  INSEQ
Corporation (the "Company"), certifies that:

1.   The Annual  Report on Form  10-KSB/A  (Amendment  1) of the Company for the
     year  ended  December  31,  2004 (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the
     requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of
     1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                               /S/      KEVIN KREISLER
                               --------------------------------
Dated: April 17, 2006                   KEVIN KREISLER
                                        Chief Executive Officer


                               /S/      JAMES GRAINER
                               --------------------------------
Dated: April 17, 2006                   JAMES GRAINER
                                        Chief Financial Officer

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this date I caused a true and correct copy of Defendants’

Motion to Preclude Recovery of Attorney Fees, to be served by United States Mail,

First Class Service, properly addressed and postage prepaid, upon the following:

Anita F. Alberts, Esquire

301 South Main Street

The Atrium, Suite W-2

Doylestown, PA 18901

Attorney for Plaintiff

 S/Sidney L.Gold, Esquire-SG1387 

SIDNEY L. GOLD, ESQUIRE

Attorney for Defendants

Dated: September 7, 2005

Case 2:02-cv-04421-PBT Document 43-3 Filed 09/07/2005 Page 1 of 1