alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017112EN.01003801.xml

| 10.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/38

---

Order of the General Court of 13 February 2017 — Pipiliagkas v Commission

(Case T-598/16) (1)

1

((Action for annulment - Civil service - Officials - Assignment - Transfer in the interest of the service - Reassignment of the applicant - Implementation of a judgment - Pre-litigation procedure - Measure not open to challenge - Inadmissibility))

(2017/C 112/52)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Nikolaos Pipiliagkas (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: J.-N. Louis and N. de Montigny, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: C. Berardis-Kayser and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application based on Articles 266 TFEU and 270 TFEU for annulment, first, of the Commission’s decision not to adopt the measures for compliance with the judgment of 15 April 2015, Pipiliagkas v Commission (F-96/13, EU:F:2015:29), and, secondly, of the Commission’s decision of 22 December 2015 reassigning the applicant from the European Union delegation to the West Bank and the Gaza Strip, East Jerusalem, to the Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport.

Pipiliagkas

Commission

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as being inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as being inadmissible.

| 2. | Mr Nikolaos Pipiliagkas shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Nikolaos Pipiliagkas shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 296, 16.8.2016 (case initially registered before the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union under number F-28/16 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1 September 2016).

1

---
(1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 (2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Partnership.
 MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING IV, L.P.By: MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC., as General PartnerBy:
    
    /s/ THOMAS W. PERRY

Name: Thomas W. Perry*Title:   Chief Accounting Officer and Controller,Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.
 Dated: May 13, 2010
 *
    
    Thomas W. Perry functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership for purposes of Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
No. 50388.

#### Protests 51637-K, etc., of William Liddell *&*Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83, decided February 5,1945.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market *245at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries. The protests were sustained to this extent.
# C_2018042EN.01001701.xml

| 5.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 42/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 42/17

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 December 2017 — Arango Jaramillo and Others v EIB

(Case T-482/16 RENV) (1)

1

((Civil service - EIB Staff - Time limit for bringing an action - Reasonable period of time - Pension - 2008 Reform - Contractual nature of the employment relationship - Proportionality - Obligation to state reasons - Legal certainty - Liability - Non-material damage))

(2018/C 042/23)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Oscar Orlando Arango Jaramillo (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) and the 33 other applicants whose names appear in the annex to the judgment (represented by: C. Cortese and B. Cortese, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Investment Bank (represented initially by C. Gómez de la Cruz and T. Gilliams, and subsequently by T. Gilliams and G. Nuvoli and lastly by T. Gilliams and G. Faedo, acting as Agents, and by P.-E. Partsch, lawyer)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of the decisions of the EIB, contained in the applicants’ payslips for the month of February 2010, to increase their pension contribution rates and, secondly, an order that the EIB pay a symbolic EUR 1 by way of compensation for the non-material harm allegedly suffered by the applicants.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Oscar Orlando Arango Jaramillo and the other staff members of the European Investment Bank (EIB) whose names appear in the annex to pay the costs of these proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Oscar Orlando Arango Jaramillo and the other staff members of the European Investment Bank (EIB) whose names appear in the annex to pay the costs of these proceedings.

| 3. | Orders the EIB to pay the costs incurred in Cases F-34/10, T-234/11 P and T-234/11 P RENV–RX. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the EIB to pay the costs incurred in Cases F-34/10, T-234/11 P and T-234/11 P RENV–RX.

---

(1)  OJ C 234, 28.8.2010 (case initially registered before the European Union Civil Service Tribunal under Case No F-34/10).

1

---
<PAGE>
<TABLE>
                                                                                               EXHIBIT 12
                         INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY
                       Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                        (in thousands except ratio data)
<CAPTION>
                                                                     Year Ended December 31,
                                                       1997       1998       1999       2000       2001
<S>                                                  <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>
Fixed Charges:
  Interest on First Mortgage Bonds. . . . . . . . . .$ 39,678   $ 35,910   $ 31,442   $ 24,154   $ 21,647
  Interest on Other Long-term Debt. . . . . . . . . .  21,064     27,457     38,623     55,977     56,597
  Interest on Short-term Debt . . . . . . . . . . . .   3,248      4,903      9,207     19,263     13,088
  Miscellaneous Interest Charges. . . . . . . . . . .   3,187      3,113      6,754     20,356      3,929
  Estimated Interest Element in Lease Rentals . . . .  79,700     79,300     73,800     74,100     74,000
       Total Fixed Charges. . . . . . . . . . . . . .$146,877   $150,683   $159,826   $193,850   $169,261

Earnings:
  Net Income (Loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$146,740   $ 96,628   $ 32,776  $(132,032)  $ 75,788
  Plus Federal Income Taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . .  74,223     47,210     18,866     (4,524)    49,725
  Plus State Income Taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   7,519      4,938     (7,352)     9,237      9,442
  Plus Fixed Charges (as above) . . . . . . . . . . . 146,877    150,683    159,826    193,850    169,261
       Total Earnings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .$375,359   $299,459   $204,116  $  66,531   $304,216

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges. . . . . . . . . .    2.55       1.98       1.27       0.34       1.79
</TABLE>
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS INC.,

Plaintiff-Cross-Appellant,

v.

MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. AND MYLAN 

INC.,

Defendants-Appellants.

______________________ 

2014-1324, -1365

______________________ 

Appeals from the United States District Court for the 

District of Delaware in No. 1:11-cv-00717-RMB-KW, 

Judge Renee Marie Bumb.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. AND MYLAN 

INC.,

Defendants-Appellees.

______________________ 

2014-1422

Case: 14-1324 Document: 19 Page: 1 Filed: 05/30/2014
2 ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS INC. v. MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

District of Delaware in No. 1:11-cv-00717-RMB-KW, 

Judge Renee Marie Bumb.

______________________ 

ON MOTION

______________________ 

Before NEWMAN, Circuit Judge. 

O R D E R

Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Mylan Inc. (Mylan) 

move without opposition to reactivate and dismiss Appeal 

Nos. 2014-1324, -1365. Mylan also moves to dismiss 

certain portions of Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc.’s Appeal 

No. 2014-1422. Endo opposes dismissal of Appeal No. 

2014-1422. 

These appeals all stem from the same district court 

action. In Appeal No. 2014-1422, Endo appeals from the 

district court’s grant of Mylan’s Rule 60(b) motion, which 

vacated the judgment previously challenged in Appeal 

Nos. 2014-1324, -1365, as well as other orders. Mylan’s 

motion seeks to limit Endo’s appeal to the district court’s 

Rule 60(b) decision. 

No briefs have yet been filed in this appeal. We deem 

it the better course for Mylan to raise any issues concerning jurisdiction in its brief. 

Accordingly,

 IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

(1) Mylan’s motion to reactivate and dismiss Appeal 

Nos. 2014-1324, -1365 is granted. 

Case: 14-1324 Document: 19 Page: 2 Filed: 05/30/2014
 ENDO PHARMACEUTICALS INC. v. MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS 3

(2) Each party shall bear its own costs in Appeal Nos. 

2014-1324, -1365.

(3) Mylan’s motion to dismiss Appeal No. 2014-1422 is 

denied.

(4) The opening brief in 2014-1422 shall be due no later than June 20, 2014. 

 FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole 

 Daniel E. O’Toole

 Clerk of Court

ISSUED AS A MANDATE (As To 14-1324, -1365 Only): 

May 30, 2014

s30

Case: 14-1324 Document: 19 Page: 3 Filed: 05/30/2014
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 99.3

                        Report of Independent Accountants


To the Board of Directors of
Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A.

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying Management
Report on Internal Control over Processing and Reporting Relating to Securitized
Automobile Financing Receivables, that the Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A. (the
"Bank"), as servicer of Chase Manhattan Auto Owner Trusts, maintained effective
internal control over processing and reporting relating to securitized
automobile financing receivables for the 12 months ended December 31, 2003,
based on criteria for effective internal control established in "Internal
Control - Integrated Framework" issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Bank's management is responsible
for maintaining effective internal control over processing and reporting
relating to securitized automobile financing receivables. Our responsibility is
to express an opinion on management's assertion based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards
established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and,
accordingly, included obtaining an understanding of internal control over
processing and reporting relating to securitized automobile financing
receivable, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of
internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.

Because of inherent limitations in any internal control, misstatement due to
error or fraud may occur and not be detected. Also, projections of any
evaluation of internal control over processing and reporting relating to
securitized automobile financing receivables to future periods are subject to
the risk that the internal control may become inadequate because of changes in
conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may
deteriorate.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A.,
as servicer of Chase Manhattan Auto Owner Trusts, maintained effective internal
control over processing and reporting relating to securitized automobile
financing receivables for the 12 months ended December 31, 2003, is fairly
stated, in all material respects, based on the criteria for effective internal
control established in "Internal Control - Integrated Framework" issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.


/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

March 25, 2004
# United States Court of Appeals **For the First Circuit**
No. 00-2028 UNITED STATES, Plaintiff, Appellant,

v. MASSACHUSETTS WATER RESOURCES AUTHORITY; METROPOLITAN DISTRICT COMMISSION, Defendants, Appellees. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

ERRATA SHEET The opinion of this Court issued on July 16, 2001, is amended as follows: Page 2, first and second lines: Reverse the order of the words "Water" and "Drinking."
Before the Second Division,

May 24, 1957

No. 60784.

#### Lucas Electrical Services, Inc., and Lep Transport, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 278487-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of ammeters similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Lucas Electrical Services, Inc.,*and *Frank J. Eberle Co.*v. *United States*(36 Cust. Ct. 209, C. D. 1776), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Before the First Division,

June 7, 1956

No. 60007.

#### F. W. Myers & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 28782-K, etc. (Detroit).

*469Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the lumber is similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. *F. W. Myers & Co., Inc.*(24 C. C. P. A. 156, T. D. 48640) and *F. W. Myers & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(73 Treas. Dec. 714, T. D. 49530), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained as to certain of the protests in question. The collector was directed to reliquidate the entries on the basis of the actual number of board feet of planed, tongued, and/or grooved lumber imported, as shown on the invoices and/or the entries covered by the said protests, or as may be calculated arithmetically from the information shown thereon. In all other respects and as to all other merchandise, the protests were overruled.
# Company Reports Pools Participa
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          OCT-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1995
<CASH>                                         7097000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  2691000
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                       162113000<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                29935000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               149099000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          3514000
<BONDS>                                       57212000
<COMMON>                                     123844000       
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<OTHER-SE>                                   (37262000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 149099000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                              22853000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                              14275000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               7000000<F3>
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             5281000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (3703000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (3703000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                7567000<F2>
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   3864000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .72
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .72
<FN>
<F1>This item consists of Properties Owned
    and Properties Available for Sale.
<F2>This item consists of Gains on Sales of Properties
<F3>This item consists of Writedown in carrying value of
    investments
</FN>
|  Name                of Entity                                              |   | State                of Incorporation/Jurisdiction |   | Doing                Business As                        |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------|
| §  Southern                Indiana Gas and Electric Company, Inc. |   | Indiana                                            |   | Vectren                Energy Delivery of Indiana, Inc. |
| §  Indiana                Gas Company, Inc.                       |   | Indiana,                Ohio                       |   | Vectren                Energy Delivery of Indiana, Inc. |
| §  Vectren                Energy Delivery of Ohio, Inc.           |   | Ohio                                               |   |                                                    |

|   |   |   |   |   |
|--------|--------|--------|--------|--------|
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U. S. C. SECTION 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Finity Holdings, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10 -QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I John A.
Courter, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U. S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

*1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

*2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                               /s/John A. Courter
                              --------------------
                                 John A. Courter

*The foregoing certification relates to a registrant which has ceased operations
and has assets as of September 30, 2002 consisting solely of cash in the amount
of $7,546. Accordingly, the registrant has no disclosure controls and procedures
or internal controls and procedures with respect to which conclusions about, or
an evaluation of, effectiveness or significant changes thereof can be disclosed
as required by Item 307of Regulation S-B.
|                                                                          |   | Years Ended December 31, |    |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------|---------|
|                                                                          |   | 2006                     |    | 2007 |   |   | 2008 |   |   | 2009  |   | 2010 |   |
| EARNINGS                                                                      |   |                |    |    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Income Before Income Taxes                                                    |   | $                        | 197,273 |   | $ | 204,394 |   | $ | 190,133 |   | $ | 297,347 |   | $ | 189,517 |   |
| Fixed Charges (as below)                                                      |   |                     | 142,388 |   |   | 161,849 |   |   | 164,660 |   |   | 173,293 |   |   | 174,965 |   |
| Total Earnings                                                                |   | $                        | 339,661 |   | $ | 366,243 |   | $ | 354,793 |   | $ | 470,640 |   | $ | 364,482 |   |
|                                                                          |   |                     |    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| FIXED CHARGES                                                                 |   |                     |    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Interest Expense                                                              |   | $                        | 72,723  |   | $ | 80,034 |   | $ | 89,851 |   | $ | 101,145 |   | $ | 104,465 |   |
| Credit for Allowance for Borrowed Funds Used    During Construction |   |                     | 7,465   |   |   | 5,315 |   |   | 4,609 |   |   | 8,348 |   |   | 8,500 |   |
| Estimated Interest Element in Lease Rentals                                   |   |                     | 62,200  |   |   | 76,500 |   |   | 70,200 |   |   | 63,800 |   |   | 62,000 |   |
| Total Fixed Charges                                                           |   | $                        | 142,388 |   | $ | 161,849 |   | $ | 164,660 |   | $ | 173,293 |   | $ | 174,965 |   |
|                                                                          |   |                     |    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
| Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                                            |   |                     | 2.38    |   |   | 2.26 |   |   | 2.15 |   |   | 2.71 |   |   | 2.08 |   |
|                                                                          |   |                     |    |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   |
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

AMERICAN STORES PROPERTIES, : CIVIL ACTION

INC., :

: NO. 05-1461

Plaintiff, :

 :

v. :

:

SPOTTS, STEVENS & MCCOY, INC., :

et al., :

:

Defendants. :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 13th day of August, 2009, upon consideration of Defendant Timothy E.

Debes’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 40), it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

1. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED as to Counts III and IV of the

Amended Complaint;

2. Pursuant to the Court’s Opinions in this case filed on this date, Plaintiff may file

an Amended Complaint consistent with the Opinions.

BY THE COURT:

s/ Joel H. Slomsky 

 JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J.

Case 2:05-cv-01461-JHS Document 195 Filed 08/13/09 Page 1 of 1
# Data

&"Calibri,Bold"&16&KFF0000DRAFT	

&"Arial,Bold"&10Bulletin No. 2022-12	&"Arial,Bold"&KFF0000DRAFT&K01+000 VII VSR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"&10IRC Handout 4/20/22