alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Merrill Lynch
Preferred Capital Trust IV and Merrill Lynch Preferred Funding IV, L.P.
(the "Partnership") for the period ended June 29, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Gary Carlin, Controller of Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc., the General
Partner of the Partnership, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
    of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
    Partnership.




                              MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING IV, L.P.

                              By:  MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC., as General Partner


                              By:  /s/ GARY CARLIN
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                              Name:    Gary Carlin *
                              Title:   Controller, Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.








Dated: August 10, 2007
______________________

*  Gary Carlin functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
   and Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership for purposes of Section 906
   of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 19-0262

_________________

MOUNTAIN WATER COMPANY,

 Plaintiff and Appellant,

 v.

MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,

 Defendant and Appellee,

 and

CITY OF MISSOULA, a Montana municipal 

corporation,

 Intervenor, Appellee,

 and Cross-Appellant,

 and

MISSOULA COUNTY,

 Intervenor, Appellee,

 and Cross-Appellant.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to the Court sitting en banc. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of record and to the 

Honorable Leslie Halligan, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 18 2020

03/18/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0262
No. 49581.

#### Protest 961610-G of Salomon & Phillips (Los Angeles).

*248Opinion by

Walker, J.

It was stipulated at the trial that’ the total weight was 1,575 pounds and that said soap contains 14 percent palm oil (220.5 pounds); that the remainder of the soap contains none of the other oils enumerated in said section 701; and that the record in *Emporium Capwell Co.*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 179, C. D. 318) be incorporated herein. In accordance therewith and following said cited decision the protest was sustained as outlined.
**Exhibit31.2**

 

I, Michael D. Milligan, certify that:

 

1.  I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of National Equipment Services,Inc.;

 

2.  Based on myknowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary in order to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;

 

3.  Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

 

4.  Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a–14 and 15d–14) for the registrant and we have:

 

a)  designed such disclosure controls andprocedures or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterlyreport is being prepared;

 

b)  evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented within thisreport our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

c)  disclosed in this report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarterin the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting;

 

5.  Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

a)  allsignificant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformatin and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any materialweaknesses in internal controls; and

 

b)  any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financialreporting.

 

 

Date:  April 8, 2004

 
| /s/  MICHAEL D. MILLIGAN |   |
|--------------------------|--------|
|                     |
| Michael  D. Milligan     |
| Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----
# C_2018104EN.01003502.xml

| 19.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 104/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 104/35

---

Judgment of the General Court of 7 February 2018 — Şölen Çikolata Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret v EUIPO — Zaharieva (Display box for cornets)

(Case T-793/16) (1)

1

((Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing a display box for cornets - Earlier international registration designating Bulgaria - Ground for invalidity - Use in the subsequent design of a distinctive sign the holder of which has the right to prohibit such use - Article 25(1)(e) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Obligation to state reasons - Article 62 of Regulation No 6/2002 - Duty of diligence - Article 63(1) of Regulation No 6/2002))

(2018/C 104/46)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Şölen Çikolata Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ (Şehitkamil Gaziantep, Turkey) (represented by: T. Tsenova, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the Court: Elka Zaharieva (Plovdiv, Bulgaria) (represented by: A. Kostov, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 September 2016 (Case R 1143/2015-3), relating to invalidity proceedings between Şölen Çikolata Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret and Mrs Zaharieva.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 12 September 2016 (Case R 1143/2015-3); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 12 September 2016 (Case R 1143/2015-3);

| 2. | Grants the application for a declaration that the design registered under number 002343244-0002 is invalid; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Grants the application for a declaration that the design registered under number 002343244-0002 is invalid;

| 3. | Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by Şölen Çikolata Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret before the General Court and before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by Şölen Çikolata Gıda Sanayi ve Ticaret before the General Court and before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO;

| 4. | Orders Mrs Elka Zaharieva to bear her own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders Mrs Elka Zaharieva to bear her own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 22, 23.1.2017.

1

---
Exhibit 32.1
 
 Statement of Chief Executive Officer Furnished
 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 The undersigned, Kim S. Price, is the President and Chief Executive Officer of Citizens South Banking Corporation (the “Company”).
 
 This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the Company of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 (the “Report”).
 
 By execution of this statement, I certify that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 A)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and
 
 B)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods covered by the Report.
  November 12, 2010
/s/ Kim S. PriceDated
Kim S. PricePresident and Chief Executive Officer
 
 This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  It is not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Citizens South Banking Corporation and will be retained by Citizens South Banking Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
----

Legislative proposals adopted by the Commission

(2006/C 184/14)

These texts are available on EUR-Lex: http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex/

----
# 2016_06 Pivot Table 5B

&F	

# Table 5 Details

&F	

&P/&N
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-2427

ROBERT EDWARD THORNTON, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

D. F. BILLETT, Administrative Law Judge;

CARROLL H. CRAWFORD, Vocational Expert; JANE

L. WARREN, DDS Examiner; SUSAN KING MARTIN,

DDS Examiner,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Greenville. Cameron McGowan Currie, District

Judge. (CA-01-2520-6-22BC)

Submitted: January 28, 2002 Decided: February 7, 2002

Before NIEMEYER, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Edward Thornton, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Robert Edward Thornton, Jr., seeks to appeal the district

court’s order dismissing his civil action alleging that the

Appellees improperly handled his social security case. Finding no

reversible error, we affirm.

We find that the action is most properly construed as one

under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). As noted by the district court,

Thornton does not specify any claim against the Appellees other

than that they improperly handled his application for social

security benefits and improperly evaluated him. Even if we liberally construe his complaint to allege due process violations, we

find that Thornton fails to state a claim upon which relief may be

granted under Bivens. See Schweiker v. Chilicky, 487 U.S. 412,

428-29 (1988).

Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Ronald J. Ivans,
Chief Financial Officer of the managing owner, Prudential Securities Futures Management Inc. (the Managing Owner), of World Monitor TrustSeries A (Series A), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | Series As Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 26, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Quarterly Report),
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Series A.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                              |  | 
|------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ Ronald J. Ivans                                           |  | 
|                                                              |  | 
|Ronald J. Ivans Chief Financial Officer of the Managing Owner |  | 
|                                                              | 
|May 10, 2004                                                  |  |
Office of the Secretary 

 of Transportation

GENERAL COUNSEL 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, D.C. 20590

July 27,2011

MEMORANDUM TO THE DOCKET 

Prepared By: Robert Klothe

Office of the General Counsel

Regulations and Enforcement

x6-4713

Subject: Telephone conversation between the Secretary of Transportation and 

Captain Lee Moak, Air Line Pilots Association, July 26, 2011; Flightcrew 

Member Duty and Rest Requirements, RIN 2120-AJ58

On July 26, 2011, Captain Lee Moak of the Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA) called Secretary

Ray LaHood. Also present with Secretary LaHood were Gregory Woods, Deputy General 

Counsel, and Robert Klothe, Senior Attorney, Regulations and Enforcement.

Among the items discussed during the brief phone conversation was the Federal Aviation 

Administration’s rulemaking on Flightcrew Member Duty and Rest Requirements, RIN 2120-

AJ58. Capt. Moak expressed appreciation to Secretary LaHood for the Secretary’s support of

this rulemaking, and to the staffs at the Federal Aviation Administration and the Office of the 

Secretary for the way the rulemaking was developed. He stated that the rulemaking was very

important to ALPA members. Capt. Moak then asked if there was anything else that ALPA 

could do “to push this safety regulation over the goal line.”

Secretary LaHood assured Capt. Moak that he and the Department would do everything possible 

to get the rule done. He suggested that ALPA continue to make its views known in appropriate 

public fora.
### TEXA S COU RT O F AP PEAL S, THIR D DISTRIC T, AT AU STIN NO. 03-00-00727-CR

Peter Tor res , Appellant v. The State of Texas , Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT CO URT OF HAYS COUNTY, 22ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. CR-00-035, HONO RABLE DON B. MORGAN, JUDGE PRESIDING Appe llantPeter Lo uis T o rr es pl ea de d g ui lt y t o en ga gi ng in o r ga niz ed cr imina l ac t ivit y. SeeTex. Penal

Code Ann . § 71.02(a)(1) (West Supp 2001) . The dist rict co ur t adjud ged app ellant gui l ty and as ses sed

pun i sh men t at in carc eration i

n a state j ail f or two ye ars and a $1000 f in e. The re was no p lea bar gain.

Appellant’s co ur t - ap po int ed at t o rne y filed a b r ief c o nc lud ing t ha t t he ap pe al is fri volous and wi

thout m eri t. Th e b rief meets th e r eq ui re men ts o f Anders

v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967 ), by pre sent ing a pr ofe ssio nal evalua t ion o f the re co rd demo nst ra t ing why t her e ar e no ar gu ab le grounds t o be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio , 48 8 U. S. 75 ( 198 8); High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807 (T ex. Cr im . App . 19 78) ; Currie v. State , 516 S. W.2d 684 (T ex. Cr im . App . 19 74) ; Jackson v. State , 485 S. W.2d 553 (T ex. Cr im . App . 19 72) ; Gainous v. State , 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex. Crim. App. 1969). A copy of

counsel ’s b

rief was del iv ered t o a ppe llant, and a ppe llantwas advise d o f his right to exam in e the appel

la te recor d and to file

a pro se brie f. No pro se bri ef h as been fi le d.2 We have r eviewe d t he record and counsel ’s b rief and agree that the appeal

is fri volous an d w it ho ut mer it . We find no t hing in t he r ec o r d t ha t migh t ar gu ab ly su pp o r t t he ap pe al.

The j udgme

nt of convi

ction i s af fi rmed.

Lee Yeakel, Justice Be f ore C hi ef Ju sti ceA bou ss i e, J us ti ce s Y ea

ke l an d Pa tters on Af fi rmed File d: June 14, 2001 Do No t Publis

h
Case 2:05-cv-00396-LS Document 179 Filed 05/12/09 Page 1 of 26
Case 2:05-cv-00396-LS Document 179 Filed 05/12/09 Page 2 of 26
Case 2:05-cv-00396-LS Document 179 Filed 05/12/09 Page 3 of 26
Case 2:05-cv-00396-LS Document 179 Filed 05/12/09 Page 4 of 26
Case 2:05-cv-00396-LS Document 179 Filed 05/12/09 Page 5 of 26
Case 2:05-cv-00396-LS Document 179 Filed 05/12/09 Page 6 of 26
Case 2:05-cv-00396-LS Document 179 Filed 05/12/09 Page 7 of 26
Case 2:05-cv-00396-LS Document 179 Filed 05/12/09 Page 8 of 26
Case 2:05-cv-00396-LS Document 179 Filed 05/12/09 Page 9 of 26
Case 2:05-cv-00396-LS Document 179 Filed 05/12/09 Page 10 of 26
Case 2:05-cv-00396-LS Document 179 Filed 05/12/09 Page 11 of 26
Case 2:05-cv-00396-LS Document 179 Filed 05/12/09 Page 12 of 26
Case 2:05-cv-00396-LS Document 179 Filed 05/12/09 Page 13 of 26
Case 2:05-cv-00396-LS Document 179 Filed 05/12/09 Page 14 of 26
Case 2:05-cv-00396-LS Document 179 Filed 05/12/09 Page 15 of 26
Case 2:05-cv-00396-LS Document 179 Filed 05/12/09 Page 16 of 26
Case 2:05-cv-00396-LS Document 179 Filed 05/12/09 Page 17 of 26
Case 2:05-cv-00396-LS Document 179 Filed 05/12/09 Page 18 of 26
Case 2:05-cv-00396-LS Document 179 Filed 05/12/09 Page 19 of 26
Case 2:05-cv-00396-LS Document 179 Filed 05/12/09 Page 20 of 26
Case 2:05-cv-00396-LS Document 179 Filed 05/12/09 Page 21 of 26
Case 2:05-cv-00396-LS Document 179 Filed 05/12/09 Page 22 of 26
Case 2:05-cv-00396-LS Document 179 Filed 05/12/09 Page 23 of 26
Case 2:05-cv-00396-LS Document 179 Filed 05/12/09 Page 24 of 26
Case 2:05-cv-00396-LS Document 179 Filed 05/12/09 Page 25 of 26
Case 2:05-cv-00396-LS Document 179 Filed 05/12/09 Page 26 of 26
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-134911, 333-149170, 333-150359, 333-150368) and Form S-8 (No. 333-106311, 333-150356, 333-151916) of our report dated February 27, 2009, relating to the consolidated financial statements and internal control
over financial reporting of GMX Resources Inc. and Subsidiaries, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2008 and to the reference to us under the heading Experts in such Prospectus.



/s/ Smith, Carney & Co., p.c.Smith, Carney & Co., p.c.


Oklahoma City, OK

March 2, 2009
# C_2018427EN.01004801.xml

| 26.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 427/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 427/48

---

Judgment of the General Court of 4 October 2018 — Proof IT v EIGE

(Case T-914/16) (1)

(Public service contracts - Tender procedure - Request for services that were split into two lots - Management consultancy services - Maintenance and updating of statistical tools and resources - Rejection of the tender submitted by a tenderer - Award criteria - Transparency - Equal treatment - Manifest error of assessment - Non-contractual liability)

(2018/C 427/60)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Proof IT SIA (Riga, Latvia) (represented by: J. Jerņeva and D. Pāvila, lawyers)

Defendant: European Institute for Gender Equality (EIGE) (represented by: J. Stuyck, V. Ost and M.Vanderstraeten, lawyers)

Re:

Application, first, under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of EIGE’s decision, communicated to the applicant by the letter with reference EIGE/VL/mpD/2016/594 of 14 October 2016, rejecting the tender submitted by the applicant in the context of both lots relating to invitation to tender EIGE/2016/OPER/01 entitled ‘Framework contract on maintenance and update of EIGE’s gender statistics tools and resources’ and awarding the framework contract to another tenderer and, second, under Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation for the harm allegedly suffered by the applicant in respect of loss of opportunity or loss of the contract itself.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Proof IT SIA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Proof IT SIA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 78, 13.3.2017.

---