alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016287EN.01001601.xml

| 8.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 287/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 287/16

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (France) lodged on 30 May 2016 — Solar Electric Martinique v Ministre des finances et des comptes publics

(Case C-303/16)

(2016/C 287/19)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Conseil d’État

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Solar Electric Martinique

Appellant:

Respondent: Ministre des finances et des comptes publics

Respondent:

Question referred

Question referred

Does the sale and installation of photovoltaic panels and solar water heaters on buildings, or with a view to supplying electricity or hot water to buildings, constitute a single transaction that may be characterised as works of construction for the purposes of Article 5(5) and Article 6(1) of Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes, (1) now Article 14(3) and Article 24(1) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax? (2)

1

2

---

(1)  Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1).

1

(2)  Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1).

2

---
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 32.2
                                  ------------


                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             -----------------------
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             -----------------------
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                             ----------------------
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                  ---------------------------------------------

          In connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Integrated
Healthcare Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2006,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.       the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act
                  of 1934; and

         2.       the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company at the dates and for the period
                  indicated.

         This Certificate has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with
the Securities and Exchange Commission.



Dated: November 7, 2006                        By: /s/ Steven R. Blake
                                                  -----------------------
                                                  Steven R. Blake
                                                  Chief Financial Officer
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
131585 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STAT E OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 131585 COA: 270071 Kent CC: 04-007101-FC LOREN PETER WYNSMA, 04-008774-FC Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 5, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

l1023 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

October 31, 2006

Clerk
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

KRISTIN C. PEREZ HAINES : CIVIL ACTION

:

: NO. 02-CV-4432

v. :

:

RODNEY GENE LEE, et al. :

ORDER

AND NOW, this day of May, 2003, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s unopposed

Motion to Extend the Rebuttal Expert Report Deadline, it is ORDERED that the Motion is

GRANTED. Accordingly, Plaintiff shall file her Rebuttal Expert Report on or before June 2,

2003.

BY THE COURT:

 

BRUCE W. KAUFFMAN, J.

Case 2:02-cv-04432-BWK Document 15 Filed 05/21/2003 Page 1 of 1
|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| November                19, 2007 | /s/ Vincent                Sheeran                                                              |
|----------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                             | Vincent                Sheeran, Chief Executive Officer (Principal                Executive Officer) |

*This      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not deemed filed by the Company*
*and      is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under      the      Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made      before or after the date of the Report), irrespective of any general      incorporation language contained in such filing*
*.*

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
                    The Schedule contains summary financial 
                    information extracted from the financial
                    statements for World Monitor Trust--Series A
                    and is qualified in its entirety by reference
                    to such financial statements
</LEGEND>
<RESTATED>          
<CIK>               1051822
<NAME>              World Monitor Trust--Series A
<MULTIPLIER>        1

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1998

<PERIOD-START>                  Jan-1-1998

<PERIOD-END>                    Mar-31-1998

<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-Mos

<CASH>                          1,000

<SECURITIES>                    0

<RECEIVABLES>                   0

<ALLOWANCES>                    0

<INVENTORY>                     0

<CURRENT-ASSETS>                1,000

<PP&E>                          0

<DEPRECIATION>                  0

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  1,000

<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           0

<BONDS>                         0

<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0

<PREFERRED>                     0

<COMMON>                        0

<OTHER-SE>                      1,000

<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    1,000

<SALES>                         0

<TOTAL-REVENUES>                0

<CGS>                           0

<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0

<OTHER-EXPENSES>                0

<LOSS-PROVISION>                0

<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0

<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0

<INCOME-TAX>                    0

<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0

<DISCONTINUED>                  0

<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0

<CHANGES>                       0

<NET-INCOME>                    0

<EPS-PRIMARY>                   0

<EPS-DILUTED>                   0

</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1


                                   EXHIBIT 11
                          Flagstar Capital Corporation
                      Computation of Net Earnings per Share


Net earnings for earnings per share are computed by subtracting from the
applicable earnings the dividend requirements on preferred stock to arrive at
earnings available to common stock and dividing this amount by the weighted
average number of common stock outstanding during the period.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                     For the Quarter and Period ended March 31,
                                                           1999                      1998
                                                   ------------------------------------------------
                                                          (In thousands, except share data)
<S>                                                <C>                       <C>
Net Earnings                                                 $    1,778                $    683
Less: preferred stock dividends                                   1,222                     483
                                                   ======================    ======================
Net income available to common stock                         $      556                     200
                                                   ======================    ======================
Average common shares outstanding                             1,000,000                 500,000

Net earnings per share - basic                                   $ 0.56                  $ 0.40

Net earnings per share - diluted                                 $ 0.56                  $ 0.40

</TABLE>


























                                       11
No. 53463.

protests 85498-K, etc. (New York).

#### Yardley & Co., Ltd. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of bottles the same in all material respects as those passed upon in *Griffon Importing Co.*v. *United States*(36 C. C. P. A. 121, C. A. D. 408), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
July 8, 2011

Dean T. Peterson

Director of A&P School School of Missionary Aviation Technology 468 East Sprague Road d-175 Ionia, MI 48846

Dear Mr. Peterson:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request. It explains why we can’t process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your May 16, 2011, exemption request on behalf of School of Missionary Aviation Technology into the public docket (No. FAA-2011-0549), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of 14 CFR 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption wouldn’t adversely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you m ust send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. We will consider the docket on your request open until we receive this required information from you. Please note that 14 CFR 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we don’t hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Dennis R. Pratte for Brenda D. Courtney Manager, Aircraft and Airport Rules Division

Enclosure
ERNST & YOUNG	**Ernst & Young LLP** 	 Phone: (816) 474-5200
One Kansas City Place	www.ey.com

1200 Main Street

Kansas City, Missouri 64105-2143

Report on Management's Assertion on Compliance

With the Minimum Servicing Standards Set Forth in the
*Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers*
Report of Independent Accountants

The Audit Committee 

The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc.

We have examined management's assertion, included in the accompanying report titled *Report of Management, that Midland Loan Services, Inc. (MLS), an indirectly wholly owned subsidiary of The PNC Financial Services Group, Inc., complied with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's *Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers (USAP) except for commercial loan and multifamily loan servicing, minimum servicing standards V.4. and VI.1., which the Mortgage Bankers Association of America has interpreted as inapplicable to such servicing during the year ended December 31, 2001. Management is responsible for MLS's compliance with those requirements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertions about MLS's compliance based on our examination.
Our examination was made in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about MLS's compliance with those requirements and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on MLS's compliance with specified requirements.

In our opinion, management's assertion that MLS complied with the aforementioned requirements during the year ended December 31, 2001 is fairly stated, in all material respects.
*Ernst & Young LLP

February 15, 2002

0202-02758 t r
Ernst & Young LLP isa member of Ernst & Young International, Ltd.***
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

KATHY IRIZARRY : CIVIL ACTION

:

vs. :

:

HENRY MEARIG, INC. : NO. 02-4412

O R D E R

AND NOW, TO WIT: This day of May, 2003, it having been reported that

the issues between the parties in the above action has been settled and upon Order of the Court

pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1(b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court

(effective January 1, 1970), it is

ORDERED that the above action is DISMISSED with prejudice, pursuant to

agreement of counsel without costs.

BY THE COURT

 

CAROL SANDRA MOORE WELLS

U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Civ 2 (7/83)

41.1(b)

Case 2:02-cv-04412-CMR Document 8 Filed 05/30/2003 Page 1 of 1
No. 65438.

#### Jovita Perez *v.*United States,

protest 269301-K (Laredo).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with- stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *The Best Foods, Inc.*(47 C.C.P.A. 163, C.A.D. 751), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 10-9 Filed 08/05/2002 Page 1 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 10-9 Filed 08/05/2002 Page 2 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 10-9 Filed 08/05/2002 Page 3 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 10-9 Filed 08/05/2002 Page 4 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 10-9 Filed 08/05/2002 Page 5 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 10-9 Filed 08/05/2002 Page 6 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 10-9 Filed 08/05/2002 Page 7 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 10-9 Filed 08/05/2002 Page 8 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 10-9 Filed 08/05/2002 Page 9 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 10-9 Filed 08/05/2002 Page 10 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 10-9 Filed 08/05/2002 Page 11 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 10-9 Filed 08/05/2002 Page 12 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 10-9 Filed 08/05/2002 Page 13 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 10-9 Filed 08/05/2002 Page 14 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 10-9 Filed 08/05/2002 Page 15 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 10-9 Filed 08/05/2002 Page 16 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 10-9 Filed 08/05/2002 Page 17 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 10-9 Filed 08/05/2002 Page 18 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 10-9 Filed 08/05/2002 Page 19 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 10-9 Filed 08/05/2002 Page 20 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 10-9 Filed 08/05/2002 Page 21 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 10-9 Filed 08/05/2002 Page 22 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 10-9 Filed 08/05/2002 Page 23 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 10-9 Filed 08/05/2002 Page 24 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 10-9 Filed 08/05/2002 Page 25 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 10-9 Filed 08/05/2002 Page 26 of 26
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

 STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002,

      The undersigned, Martin A. Thomson, is the President and Chief Executive
Officer of Alpena Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company").

      This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the
Company of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
December 31, 2003 (the "Report").

      By execution of this statement, I certify that to the best of my
knowledge:

            A)    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
                  U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and

            B)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
                  covered by the Report.

      This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so
that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that this
statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.



March 30, 2004                                      /s/ Martin A. Thomson
------------------                               --------------------------
Dated                                                 Martin A. Thomson
Document

Exhibit 10.7



The following current executive officers have entered into Executive Severance Agreements with the Company in the form filed herewith. The information listed below is inserted into the blanks for the respective executive officer’s Executive Severance Agreement.
																					
			Salary Multiplier Rate		Termination Period		Change of Control
Continuation Period
			(Section 4(a)(4))		(Section 1(n))		(Section 2)
							
	Blake W. Krueger		3		3 years		36 months
	James D. Zwiers		2		2 years		24 months
# C_2018352EN.01003201.xml

| 1.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 352/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.10.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 352/32

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 July 2018 — BNP Paribas v ECB

(Case T-768/16) (1)

((Economic and monetary policy - Prudential supervision of credit institutions - Article 4(1)(d) and (3) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 - Calculation of the leverage ratio - Refusal of the ECB to grant authorisation to the applicant to exclude exposures meeting certain conditions from the calculation of the leverage ratio - Article 429(14) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 - Discretion of the ECB - Errors of law - Manifest error of assessment))

(2018/C 352/37)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: BNP Paribas (Paris, France) (represented by: A. Champsaur and A. Delors, lawyers)

Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: K. Lackhoff, R. Bax, G. Bassani and C. Olivier, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Republic of Finland (represented by: S. Hartikainen, acting as Agent)

Re:

Application on the basis of Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of European Central Bank Decision ECB/SSM/2016-R0MUWSFPU8MPRO8K5P83/136 of 24 August 2016, taken pursuant to Article 4(1)(d) and Article 10 of Council Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 of 15 October 2013 conferring specific tasks on the European Central Bank concerning policies relating to the prudential supervision of credit institutions (OJ 2013 L 287, p. 63), and Article 429(14) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on the prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms and amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 (OJ 2013 L 176, p. 1, corrigenda OJ 2013 L 208, p. 68 and OJ 2013 L 321, p. 6).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls European Central Bank (ECB) Decision ECB/SSM/2016-R0MUWSFPU8MPRO8K5P83/136 of 24 August 2016; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls European Central Bank (ECB) Decision ECB/SSM/2016-R0MUWSFPU8MPRO8K5P83/136 of 24 August 2016;

| 2. | Orders the ECB to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the ECB to pay the costs;

| 3. | Orders the Republic of Finland to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Republic of Finland to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 6, 9.1.2017.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

:

DOLORES (DEE) BARRETT, :

:

Plaintiff, : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. : NO. 02-4421

:

THE GREATER HATBORO CHAMBER :

OF COMMERCE, INC., et al., :

:

Defendants. :

:

NOTICE

Please be advise that the above-captioned matter shall be placed on the Court’s trial list

for Monday, April 4, 2005.

FOR THE COURT:

 

Alisa Ross

Deputy Clerk to Judge Petrese B. Tucker

(267) 299-7619

cc: A. Alberts

S. Gold

Case 2:02-cv-04421-PBT Document 30 Filed 02/02/2005 Page 1 of 1