alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT31.2**

 

**CertificationPursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Wilson W. Cheung, certify that:

 

1. I havereviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of AXT, Inc.;

 

2. Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3. Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a) Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors:

 

(a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Dated: August 9, 2005 | By:    | /s/ Wilson W. Cheung    |
|-----------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                  |   | Wilson W. Cheung        |
|                  |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
No. 56293.

protest 174625-K (New York).

#### Star Importing Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of synthetic stones the same in all material respects as those the subject of *S. Nathan & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(37 C. C. P. A. 99, C. A. D. 426), the claim at 10 percent under paragraph 1528 was sustained.
No. 58917.

protests 180497-K, etc. (New York).

#### Bertrand Freres, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of essential oils the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Ungerer & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 152, C. D. 1647), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 59488.

protest 248843-K (New York).

#### Globe Feather & Down Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

The collector’s memorandum, which was received in evidence, states that the entry was liquidated on the basis of an incorrect net weight and that the net weight is 7,838 pounds. On the record presented, it was held that the merchandise is dutiable on the basis of a net weight of 7,838 pounds.
# C_2015371EN.01003801.xml

| 9.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 371/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 371/38

---

Action brought on 16 September 2015 — LG Electronics v OHIM — Cyrus Wellness Consulting (Viewty GT)

(Case T-534/15)

(2015/C 371/39)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: LG Electronics, Inc. (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (represented by: M. Graf, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Cyrus Wellness Consulting GmbH (Berlin, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Applicant of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word elements ‘Viewty GT’ — Community trade mark application No 9 017 237

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before OHIM:

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 June 2015 in Joined Cases R 1937/2014-2 and R 1564/2014-2

Contested decision:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
[Front Matter]

***Cardiac Rehabilitation as Secondary Prevention***
<PAGE>

                             TUSCANY MINERALS, LTD.



Geoffrey  N.  Goodall                         November  18,  2002
1315  Arborlynn  Drive                        Via  Facsimile
North  Vancouver,  B.C.  V7J  2V6

Dear  Mr.  Goodall;

                             Re:  Tuscany  Minerals,  Ltd.  ("Tuscany")  -
                             Option Agreement dated December 8, 2000  as
                             amended Between  Tuscany  and  Geoffrey  N.
                             Goodall  ("Goodall")  (the  "Option  Agreement")

This  letter  confirms  that  the  Option  Agreement (relating to the Holy Cross
property)  is  hereby  terminated  in accordance with Section 7(a) of the Option
Agreement and Tuscany has no further interest in or obligations arising from the
properties  referred  to  in  the  Option  Agreement.  This letter also confirms
Goodall  has agreed to waive the provisions of Section 7 relating to leaving the
property  in good standing for a period of 6 months from the date of termination
in  consideration of Tuscany agreeing to terminate the Option Agreement prior to
December  8,  2002.

Please  indicate  your  acceptance  in  the  space  set  out  below.

Yours truly,
Tuscany Minerals, Ltd.

Per: /s/ J. Stephen Barley

J. Stephen Barley, President

The  above  is  hereby  agreed  as  of  the  date  first  above  written.

/s/ Geoffrey N. Goodall
______________________
Geoffrey N. Goodall





                       2060 GISBY STREET - WEST VANCOUVER, BC - V7V 4N3
                        PHONE:  (604) 926-4300 -  FAX:  (604) 926-6400
                                 E-MAIL:  JSBPLC@HOME.COM
# C_2017374EN.01003301.xml

| 6.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 374/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 374/33

---

Judgment of the General Court of 22 September 2017 — Arrigoni v EUIPO — Arrigoni Battista (Arrigoni Valtaleggio)

(Case T-454/16) (1)

1

((European Union trade mark - Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity - International registration designating the European Union - Figurative mark Arrigoni Valtaleggio - Earlier national figurative mark ARRIGONI - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Genuine use of the earlier mark - Article 57(2) and (3) of Regulation No 207/2009))

(2017/C 374/49)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Arrigoni SpA (Rome, Italy) (represented by: P. Di Gravio, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Rampini, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Arrigoni Battista ApA (Bergamo, Italy) (represented by: S. Verea, M. Balestriero and K. Muraro, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 May 2016 (Case R 2922/2014 1), relating to proceedings for a declaration of invalidity between Arrigoni and Arrigoni Formaggi SpA.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

dismisses the action;

| 2. | orders Arrigoni SpA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

orders Arrigoni SpA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 364, 3.10.2016.

1

---
No. 48438.

#### Protests 772532-G, etc., of Centennial Flouring Mills Co. et al. (Seattle, etc.).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-7619

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

DEMETRIUS HARRISON,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at 

Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:07-cr-00083-BO-1)

Submitted: April 25, 2017 Decided: May 10, 2017

Before GREGORY, Chief Judge, and MOTZ and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Demetrius Harrison, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. May-Parker, Assistant United States 

Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Demetrius Harrison appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reduce 

his sentence of imprisonment by nine months. Because the district court correctly 

concluded that it lacked the authority to grant Harrison’s motion, we affirm. See United 

States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233, 235-36 (4th Cir. 2010). We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

**In connection with the AnnualReport of Cap Rock Energy Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the yearended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, William L. West, President and ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:**

** **

(1)                                  The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

 

(2)                                  The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 

Dated:  March 29, 2006

 

 
|   | By:                                    | /s/  William L. West |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------|----------------------|--------|
|   | William  L. West                       |
|   | President  and Chief Executive Officer |
|   | (Principal  Executive Officer)         |

 

 

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906 has beenprovided to Cap Rock Energy Corporation and will be retained by Cap Rock EnergyCorporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.

 

----
|   | (1) | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|--------|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                          |                                                                                                   |                                    |
|-------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------|
| July                  3, 2006 |                                                                                              | /s/ Timothy                  Neher |
|                          | Timothy                  Neher, Chief Executive Officer (Principal                  Executive Officer) |

----
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6957 

CHARLES B. YOUNG,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

COLIE L. RUSHTON, McCI; HENRY MCMASTER,

Attorney General for South Carolina,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Beaufort. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District

Judge. (9:06-cv-00369-GRA)

Submitted: January 17, 2008 Decided: January 23, 2008

Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Charles B. Young, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, SOUTH

CAROLINA ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE, Columbia, South Carolina, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Charles Young seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion for reconsideration of the

dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is

not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any

assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is

debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by

the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell,

537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484

(2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001).

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude

that Young has not made the requisite showing. Young’s appeal is

essentially duplicative of his appeal in No. 06-8049, in which we

considered the district court’s denial of Young’s motion for

reconsideration. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
- 3 -

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 219 (Wednesday, November 15, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 78295]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-25321]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS


Sunshine Act Meeting; Commission on the Social Status of Black 
Men and Boys (CSSBMB)

AGENCY: Commission on the Social Status of Black Men and Boys (CSSBMB), 
U.S. Commission on Civil Rights.

ACTION: Notice of CSSBMB public business meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DATES: Friday, November 17, 2023, from 11:00 a.m.-12:00 p.m. EDT.

ADDRESSES: The briefing will take place virtually via YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/USCCR/videos.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Diamond Newman, 202-339-2371, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#197d777c6e74787759257839716b7c7f24" http: usccr.gov">usccr.gov</a>">dnewman@usccr.gov</a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In accordance with Public Law 116-156, 1134 
Stat. 700 (2020), the Commission on the Social Status of Black Men and 
Boys (CSSBMB) will hold its First Quarter Business Meeting exploring 
CSSBMB business items, operations, and next steps.
    This business meeting is open to the public via livestream on the 
Commission on Civil Rights' YouTube Page at https://www.youtube.com/user/USCCR/videos. (Streaming information subject to change.) Public 
participation is available for the event with view access, along with 
an audio option for listening. Computer assisted real-time 
transcription (CART) will be provided. The web link to access CART (in 
English) on Friday, November 17 is https://www.steamtext.net/player?event=USCCR (*subject to change, please visit usccr.gov for 
updates). Please note that CART is text-only translation that occurs in 
real time during the meeting and is not an exact transcript.
    * Date and meeting details are subject to change. For more 
information on the CSSBMB or the upcoming public briefing, please visit 
www.usccr.gov/CSSBMB and CSSBMB's Instagram, Facebook, and X.

Briefing Agenda

I. Opening Remarks by CSSBMB Chair, Frederica S. Wilson
II. Call to Order and Quorum
III. Approval of Agenda
IV. New Order of Business
V. Adjourn Briefing

    Dated: November 13, 2023.
Angelia Rorison,
Director of Media and Communications, United States Commission on Civil 
Rights.
[FR Doc. 2023-25321 Filed 11-13-23; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2018005EN.01003302.xml

| 8.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 5/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 5/33

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 November 2017 — Galletas Gullón v EUIPO — HUG (GULLON DARVIDA)

(Case T-456/16) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark GULLON DARVIDA - Earlier international and national word marks DAR VIDA - Documents produced for the first time before the Board of Appeal - Discretion granted by Article 76(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 95(2) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Rule 19(1) and Rule 20(1) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 7(1) and Article 8(1) and (7) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/1430) - Rule 50(1) of Regulation No 2868/95 - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation 2017/1001) - Likelihood of confusion))

(2018/C 005/44)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Galletas Gullón, SA (Aguilar de Campoo, Spain) (represented by: I. Escudero Pérez, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: E. Zaera Cuadrado, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Hug AG (Malters, Switzerland) (represented by: A. Renck and J. Schmitt, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 13 June 2016 (Case R 773/2015-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Hug and Galletas Gullón.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Galletas Gullón, SA to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and by Hug AG. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Galletas Gullón, SA to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and by Hug AG.

---

(1)  OJ C 383, 17.10.2016.

1

---
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1424 

To apply the provisions of title 5, United States Code, related to veterans’ 

preference to the Federal Aviation Administration personnel management 

system, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 22, 2017 

Ms. HIRONO (for herself, Mr. MORAN, Mr. TESTER, and Mr. DAINES) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To apply the provisions of title 5, United States Code, related 

to veterans’ preference to the Federal Aviation Administration personnel management system, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Federal Aviation Ad5 ministration Veterans’ Preference Protection Act’’. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1424 IS

1 SEC. 2. APPLICATION OF VETERANS’ PREFERENCE TO FED2 ERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION PER3 SONNEL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. 

4 Section 40122(g)(2)(B) of title 49, United States 

5 Code, is amended— 

6 (1) by inserting ‘‘3304(f),’’ before ‘‘3308- 

7 3320’’; and 

8 (2) by inserting ‘‘3330a, 3330b, 3330c, and 

9 3330d,’’ before ‘‘relating’’. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS