alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 21-2717

___________________________ Jessie Samuel Rufus Benford lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v. Schneider National Carriers, Inc. lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri - St. Louis

____________ Submitted: January 5, 2022 Filed: January 10, 2022 [Unpublished]

____________ Before BENTON, KELLY, and KOBES, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. In this employment discrimination case, Jessie Benford appeals following the district court’s 1 denial of his motion for summary judgment and grant of summary

1 The Honorable Matthew T. Schelp, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri.judgment in favor of his former employer. After careful review of the record and the

parties’ arguments on appeal, we conclude that the grant of summary judgment was proper for the reasons stated by the district court. See Banks v. John Deere & Co. , 829 F.3d 661, 665 (8th Cir. 2016) (reviewing grant of summary judgment de novo). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

-2-
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1474 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1474

    To prohibit the use of fiscal year 2018 funds for the closure, 
 consolidation, or elimination of certain offices of the Environmental 
                           Protection Agency.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 29, 2017

 Ms. Duckworth (for herself, Ms. Harris, Mr. Merkley, Mr. Durbin, Mr. 
Carper, and Mr. Sanders) introduced the following bill; which was read 
  twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To prohibit the use of fiscal year 2018 funds for the closure, 
 consolidation, or elimination of certain offices of the Environmental 
                           Protection Agency.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Recognizing the Environmental Gains 
In Overcoming Negligence Act'' or the ``REGION Act''.

SEC. 2. REGIONAL AND PROGRAM OFFICES OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 
              AGENCY.

    No regional or program office of the Environmental Protection 
Agency shall be closed, consolidated, or eliminated using funds made 
available for fiscal year 2018.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2018352EN.01003101.xml

| 1.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 352/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.10.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 352/31

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 July 2018 — BNP Paribas v ECB

(Case T-751/16) (1)

((Economic and monetary policy - Prudential supervision of credit institutions - Article 4(1)(d) and (3) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 - Calculation of the leverage ratio - Refusal of the ECB to grant authorisation to the applicant to exclude exposures meeting certain conditions from the calculation of the leverage ratio - Article 429(14) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 - Discretion of the ECB - Errors of law - Manifest error of assessment))

(2018/C 352/36)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Confédération nationale du Crédit mutuel (Paris, France) (represented by: M. Grégoire and C. De Jonghe, lawyers)

Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: K. Lackhoff, R. Bax, G. Bassani and C. Olivier, acting as Agents, and H.-G. Kamann and F. Louis, lawyers)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Republic of Finland (represented by: S. Hartikainen, acting as Agent)

Re:

Application on the basis of Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of European Central Bank Decision ECB/SSM/2016-9695000CG7B84NLR5984/92 of 24 August 2016, taken pursuant to Article 4(1)(d) and Article 10 of Council Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 of 15 October 2013 conferring specific tasks on the European Central Bank concerning policies relating to the prudential supervision of credit institutions (OJ 2013 L 287, p. 63), and Article 429(14) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on the prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms and amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 (OJ 2013 L 176, p. 1, corrigenda OJ 2013 L 208, p. 68 and OJ 2013 L 321, p. 6).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls European Central Bank (ECB) Decision ECB/SSM/2016-9695000CG7B84NLR5984/92 of 24 August 2016; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls European Central Bank (ECB) Decision ECB/SSM/2016-9695000CG7B84NLR5984/92 of 24 August 2016;

| 2. | Orders the ECB to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the ECB to pay the costs;

| 3. | Orders the Republic of Finland to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Republic of Finland to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 6, 9.1.2017.

---
AVAQMD Rule 461 - Gasoline Transfer And Dispensing

B-3

Final Staff Report, 2/12/09
Exhibit 13.1

Officer Certifications

Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United
States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of
title 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of América Móvil, S.A.B. de C.V., a sociedad anónima bursátil de capital variable organized under the laws of Mexico (the Company), does
hereby certify to such officers knowledge that:

The annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 (the
Form 20-F) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: May 13, 2011



/s/ Daniel Hajj AboumradDaniel Hajj AboumradChief Executive Officer


Dated: May 13, 2011



/s/ Carlos José García Moreno ElizondoCarlos José García Moreno ElizondoChief Financial Officer


A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The undersigned officer of Global Resource Corporation Corporation (the
"Company") hereby certifies to my knowledge that the Company's annual report on
Form 10-KSB for the year ended March 31, 2006 (the "Report"), as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission the on date hereof, fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company. This certification is provided solely
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not be deemed to be part of the Report or
"filed" for any purpose whatsoever.


Date: July 24, 2006                        Name: /s/ Mary K. Radomsky
                                                 ----------------------
                                                 Mary K. Radomsky
                                                 Title: Chief Executive Officer
Part 2

SUPPLEMENT 

DRAFT 

Number Name Description

Fatal/Proposed

Analytical Type

Applicable SMAF Attribute

 / Domain Value Left Side Labe

37

Budgetary USSGL accounts and Appropriation Transfer BETCs "AXFERC" and "AXFERD"

The sum of Appropriation Transfer BETC transactions (AXFERC and AXFERD) for a TAS must equal the sum of specific budgetary USSGL accounts 412800, 412900, 416700, 417000, 417300 and 417500.

Proposed Analytical USSGL / SMAF Account Type = EXPND

Appropriation TransfBudgetary 

125 Subsidy Collected

The sum of the BETCsCOLLSBSD, COLLSBAJ, COLLUR, COLLURAJ must equal the ending balances of USSGL 427100-Actual Program Fund Subsidy Collected.

Fatal Period # 10/11/12 Statement Line / SMAF All USSGL 

126 Fees Collected

The sum of the BETCsFEECOLL, FEECOLAJ must equal the ending balance of USSGL 426100-Actual Collections of BusinessType Fees. Fatal Period # 10/11/12 Statement Line / SMAF All USSGL 

127

Loan Principal Collected

The sum of the BETCsPRINREP, PRINREAJ must equal the ending balance of USSGL 426200-Actual Collections of Loan Principal.

Fatal Period # 10/11/12 Statement Line / SMAF All USSGL 

128

Loan Interest Collected

The sum of the BETCsINTREP, INTREPAJ must equal the ending balance of USSGL 426300-Actual Collections of Loan Interest.

Fatal Period # 10/11/12 Statement Line / SMAF All USSGL 

129

Proceeds of Foreclosed Property Collected

The sum of the BETCsPFPCOLL, PFPCOLAJ must equal the ending balance of USSGL 426500-Actual Collections From Sale of Foreclosed Property.

Fatal Period # 10/11/12 Statement Line / SMAF All USSGL 

U.S. Standard General Ledger

Data Edits - Summary Report

Bulletin No. 2021-07 DRAFT VII ESR - 1 
Part 2

SUPPLEMENT 

DRAFT 

Number Name Description

Fatal/Proposed

Analytical Type

Applicable SMAF Attribute

 / Domain Value Left Side Labe

U.S. Standard General Ledger

Data Edits - Summary Report

130 Rent Collected

The sum of the BETCsRENTCOLL, RENTCOAJ must equal the ending balance of USSGL 426400-Actual Collections of Rent.

Fatal Period # 10/11/12 Statement Line / SMAF All USSGL 

131

Other Federal Collections

The sum of the BETCsOACFED, OACFEDAJ must equal the ending balance of USSGL 427700-Other Actual CollectionsFederal/Non-Federal Exception Sources.

Fatal Period # 10/11/12 Statement Line / SMAF All USSGL 

132

Other NonFederal Collections

The sum of the BETCsONFCOLL, ONFCOLAJ must equal the ending balance of USSGL 426600-Other Actual Business-Type Collections From NonFederal Sources. Fatal Period # 10/11/12 Statement Line / SMAF All USSGL 

133

Disbursement From General Fund Appropriations

The sum of USSGL account 310710 and the change in USSGL account 141000, relative to appropriations from the Genera Fund, must equal the sum of the General Fund disbursement BETCs.

Proposed Analytical Statement Line / SMAF All USSGL 

Bulletin No. 2021-07 DRAFT VII ESR - 2
EXHIBIT NO. 32.1
Form 10-KSB
Network Capital, Inc.
File No. 000-32155


          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Network Capital, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the year ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Bruce Cairney,  Chief
Executive and Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: May 19, 2004                                   By: /s/ Bruce Cairney
      ------------                                      ------------------------
                                                                   Bruce Cairney
                                                             Chief Executive and
                                                         Chief Financial Officer

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Network Capital,  Inc. and will be retained by Network Capital, Inc.
and  furnished  to the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or its staff upon
request.
No. 56992.

#### S. B. Penick & Co. *v.*United States,

protest 189800-K (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of ichthamol similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. *Kachurin Drug Company*(39 C. C. P. A. 36, C. A. D. 459), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 51954.

#### A. Judson Murray & Co. *v.*United States,

protest 128002-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

From an examination of the papers the court was unable to find any evidence sufficient to overcome the action of the collector, which was presumptively correct. The protest was therefore overruled.
# C_2019044EN.01002501.xml

| 4.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/25

---

Judgment of the General Court of 29 November 2018 — ARFEA v Commission

(Case T-720/16) (1)

((State aid - Retroactive public service compensation granted by the Italian authorities - Regional bus transport service provided between 1997 and 1998 on the basis of concessions - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery - Altmark judgment - Temporal application of rules of substantive law))

(2019/C 44/31)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Aziende reunite filovie ed autolinee Srl (ARFEA) (Alexandria, Italy) (represented by: M. Chiti, V. Angiolini and L. Formilan, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Armati and D. Recchia, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2016/2084 of 10 June 2016 concerning State Aid SA.38132 (2015/C) (ex 2014/NN) — additional PSO compensation for ARFEA (OJ 2016 L 321, p. 57).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

dismisses the action;

| 2. | Aziende reunite filovie ed autolinee Srl (ARFEA) is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Aziende reunite filovie ed autolinee Srl (ARFEA) is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 441, 28.11.2016.

---
[){Ut 1!JA,s, /1/J~ / :33 1 f7 3 - 03 ,DL/ 

·fj_p{)}Jj ; ( r fs /LJdl /ca YJ7lor:k 

oP a JLe q!JJtf- tould {lm ~m J7JlQ 

+Jv I {jj)f JW l!tU 9 CO!JLi!lAJ;/uCJ ' J/)1 Cf ( CUM 

. · IS- J 10 Jl/1/1- +hJ !OJJf LJJJ!;/ I ); JedcJk Y<Jt (fuu -

{Jf Ji/1/ ~1;1 J;j I rhf1 . ~_2gtjc?b 

fs, · bJ(2[) 1 j)a11Jch(f}11c/ 

.. /(J!Z {J/!11- a~aSL bq 

IN Cr!UAl5::
# C_2017369EN.01001801.xml

| 30.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 369/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 369/18

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 September 2017 — Skareby v EEAS

(Case T-585/16) (1)

1

((Civil service - Officials - Freedom of expression - Duty of loyalty - Serious prejudice to the legitimate interests of the Union - Refusal of permission to publish an article - Request that the text be amended - Article 17a of the Staff Regulations - Subject matter of the action - Decision rejecting the administrative complaint))

(2017/C 369/26)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Carina Skareby (Louvain, Belgium) (represented by: S. Rodrigues and C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European External Action Service (EEAS) (represented by: S. Marquardt, acting as Agent, and by M. Troncoso Ferrer, F.-M. Hislaire and S. Moya Izquierdo, lawyers)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action under Article 270 TFEU seeking (i) annulment of the decision of 5 June 2015 of the EEAS refusing permission to publish an article and requesting that changes be made to two paragraphs of the proposed text, and (ii) ‘so far as necessary’, annulment of the decision of 18 December 2015 of the EEAS rejecting the complaint brought against the original decision.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Ms Carina Skareby to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Ms Carina Skareby to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 191, 30.5.2016 (case initially registered before the European Union Civil Service Tribunal under Case No F-15/16 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1.9.2016).

1

---
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATIONS**
**Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Director**
I, Thomas W. Rabaut, certify that:
1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of United DefenseIndustries, Inc.;
2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a)     designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;
b)     evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and
c)     disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and
5.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a)     all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
b)     any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.   Date:   November 7, 2003     /s/ Thomas W. Rabaut
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 01-2156
LEROY THURSTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus LOUISA COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS, Defendant - Appellee.

No. 01-2157
LEROY THURSTON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versusUNITED PARCEL SERVICE; ROGER COLLINS, Assistant Superintendent of Louisa County Schools, Defendants - Appellees. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Norman K. Moon, District Judge. (CA-01-84-3, CA-01-85-3)2 Submitted: November 8, 2001 Decided: November 15, 2001 Before WILKINS, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges. No. 01-2156 affirmed and No. 01-2157 dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Leroy Thurston, Appellant Pro Se. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).3 PER CURIAM: In these consolidated cases, Leroy Thurston appeals from the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice for failure to state a claim of an action brought against a former employer (No. 01-2156). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Thurston v. Louisa Cnty. Public Sch. , No. CA-01-84-3 (W.D. Va. filed Aug. 27, 2001; entered Aug. 28, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process. In No. 01-2157, Thurston appeals from the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice his claims as to Defendant Collins for failure to state a claim, but allowing the action to proceed as to the Defendant United Parcel Service (No. 01-2157). We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1994), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (1994); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp. , 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. We dismiss this appeal as interlocutory.4 We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

No. 01-2156 - AFFIRMED No. 01-2157 - DISMISSED