alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                  EXHIBIT 3.03.2

                         SECOND AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND
                    RESTATED BY-LAWS OF CSK AUTO CORPORATION

      THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDED AND RESTATED BY-LAWS OF CSK AUTO
CORPORATION (the "Amendment") is hereby adopted by the Board of Directors and
made effective as of this 6th day of May, 2004.

                                    RECITALS

      A. Article XII of the Amended and Restated By-Laws of CSK Auto
Corporation, as adopted by the Board of Directors of said corporation as of
April 27, 1999, as subsequently amended, (the "Bylaws") provides that the Board
of Directors shall have the power to, among other things, amend, alter and
repeal the Bylaws.

      B. The Board of Directors desires to amend the Bylaws in certain respects
as set forth below.

      NOW THEREFORE, the Bylaws shall be amended as follows:

                                    AMENDMENT

1.    VOTING.

      Article II, Section 11 of the Bylaws relating to voting by shareholders
shall be deleted in its entirety and the following shall be substituted
therefor:

      "Section 11. Voting. Except as otherwise provided by statute or by the
Certificate of Incorporation, each holder of record of shares of stock of the
Corporation having voting rights shall be entitled at each meeting of
stockholders to one vote for each share of stock of the Corporation standing in
his name on the records of the Corporation on the date fixed as the record date
for the determination of the stockholders entitled to notice of and to vote at
such meeting. Except as otherwise provided herein, by statute, or by the
Certificate of Incorporation, any corporate action (including the election of
directors) to be taken by the stockholders shall require the approval of a
majority of the voting power of shares present in person or represented by proxy
at such meeting and entitled to vote on such matter. No vote need be by ballot,
but in case of a vote by ballot, each ballot shall be signed by the voting
stockholder or his proxy and shall state the number of shares of stock voted."

2.    EFFECT OF AMENDMENT.

      Except as expressly modified and amended by this Amendment, the Bylaws
shall remain unmodified and in full force and effect.
HomeNRC LibraryDocument CollectionsNUREG-Series Publications

# Publications Prepared by NRC Staff

*Documentation and staff-related information, including recruiting material, or general information about the NRC. Other staff reports may be available in ADAMS.*

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, August 16, 2024

Section Navigation

#### Navigation

          - Publications Prepared by NRC Staff
          - Brochures Prepared by NRC Staff
          - Conference Proceedings Prepared by NRC Staff or Contractors
          - Publications Prepared by NRC Contractors
          - Publications Resulting from International Agreements
          - Publications Prepared by NRC Staff for Knowledge Management
          - Publications Available in Adams
          - Drafts for Comment

#### Spotlight

#### Choose a Section

                - The Commission
                - Job Openings
                - ADVANCE Act
                - Palisades Restart
                - Artificial Intelligence
                - Advanced Reactors
                - Pilgrim Water Releases
                - Monticello Tritium Issue
                - International Strategy 2021-2025
                - Tribal Liaison Program
                - MAP-X
                - OIG Hotline
                - Rulemaking Activity
                - Commission Documents

#### Search NUREG-Series Pubs

Page Last Reviewed/Updated Friday, August 16, 2024
EXHIBIT 31.1


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Kevin S. Kim, certify that:


|   |                                                                               
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | I have reviewed this periodic report on Form 10-K/A of BBCN Bancorp, Inc.; and




|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.










|                      |                 
|--------------------- | ----------------
|Dated: April 28, 2016 | /s/ Kevin S. Kim

_______________________________


Kevin S. Kim


Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
3 May 2012 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations, M-30 

West Building, Ground Floor 

Room W12-140 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Filed electronically at 

http://www.Regulations.gov

Re: Petition to review exemption No. 6485G 

 Docket No. FAA-2002-11939 

Dear Sir/Madam: 

This is a petition to renew exemption No. 6485G, which granted to Civil Air Patrol (CAP), the 

official Auxiliary of the United States Air Force (USAF) an exemption from subpart F of part 91 

of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) which exemption permits CAP to operate 

small aircraft under subpart F of part 91 and receive limited reimbursement for certain flights 

within the scope of and incidental to CAP’s corporate purposes and U.S. Air Force Auxiliary 

status. 

The current exemption is due to expire on July 31, 2012. 

CAP hereby petitions for renewal of that exemption, subject to the same conditions and 

limitations, for an additional term. 

The information, views and arguments submitted by CAP which served as the basis for the 

finding of public interest upon which the original Partial Grant of Exemption was based remain 

unchanged. 

The information, views and arguments submitted by CAP which served as the basis of the 

finding of an equivalent level of safety upon which the original Grant of Exemption was based 

are supplemented with the following additional information: In the period 2000 through 2011, 

CAP's flying program continued to operate at an extremely high level of safety, generally 

exceeding that of general aviation, experiencing overall aviation accident rates as follows: 

Rafael A. Robles, Col, CAP 

General Counsel, Civil Air Patrol 

105 S Hansell St., Building 714 

Maxwell AFB, AL 36112 

Telephone: 877-227-9142 (ext 234) 

Facsimile: 334-265-4352 

Email: rrobles@capnhq.gov 

NATIONAL HEADQUARTER CIVIL AIR PATROL 

UNITED STATES AIR FORCE AUXILIARY 

MAXWELL AIR FORCE BASE, ALABAMA 36112-6332 
US Department of Transportation 

Docket Operations, M30 

Exemption No. 6485G -- FAR 91 

3 May 2012 

Page 2. 

Year 

Civil 

Air 

Patrol 

General 

Aviation 

2000 0.94 5.78

2001 3.57 5.81

2002 7.37 6.21

2003 4.43 6.64

2004 5.23 6.04

2005 2.77 6.64

2006 1.84 6.00

2007 3.70 6.55

2008 2.84 6.28

2009 3.57 6.60

2010 1.78 6.86

2011 0.98 not avail

* Per 100,000 hours 

**Preliminary accident rate 

Therefore, CAP petitions the FAA to review and amend as required its Exemption No. 6485G 

for an additional term. 

Please feel welcome to contact me if any additional information would be of assistance in your 

consideration of this Petition. 

 

Very Respectfully, 

Rafael A. Robles, Col, CAP 

General Counsel
(Reap. Dec. 10351)

Entry No. 2516-H.

#### Dalminter, Inc. *v.*United States

(Decided *October*10, 1962)

*Sharretts, Paley & Garter*for the plaintiff.

*Joseph D. Guilfoyle,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

OliveR, Chief Judge:

Counsel for the respective parties have submitted this appeal for reappraisement on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the parties hereto that the merchandise consists of seamless steel tubing and seamless steel casing, exported from Italy, and that the facts and the law are similar in all material respects to the merchandise the subject of *United States*v. *Dalminter, Inc., R. W. Smith,*47 Cust. Ct. 577, A.R.D. 135.

> *417IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the record in A.R.D. 135 be incorporated with the record in this case.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the prices at which such or similar imported merchandise was freely offered for sale for consumption in the United States, packed ready for delivery, in the principal market of the United States to all purchasers, at the time of exportation of the imported merchandise, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, were the prices shown on Schedule A hereto attached less 2 per cent cash discount less 7.60 per cent for general expenses and 7.15 per cent for profit less ocean freight of $13.50 per metric ton less inland freight of $6.00 per metric ton less duty of 7% per cent on casing or *12y2*per cent on Grade J-55 tubing or 12 *y2*per cent plus 4 per cent on Grade N-80 tubing.

On the agreed facts and consistent with the cited decision on the law, I find that the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question is United States value, as defined in section 402(e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and hold that such statutory value therefor is the prices set forth in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, less 2 per centum cash discount, less 7.60 per centum for general expenses and 7.15 per centum-for profit, less ocean freight of $13.50 per metric ton, less inland freight of $6 per metric ton, less duty of 7% per centum on casing or 12i¿> per centum on grade J-55 tubing, or *12y2*per centum, plus 4 per centum on grade N-80 tubing.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

DWYER

: CIVIL ACTION

:

vs. :

: NO. 02-4353

ITEQ

O R D E R

AND NOW, TO WIT: This 25th day of August, 2003,

it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above action has been settled

and upon Order of the Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1(b) of the Local Rules of

Civil Procedure of this Court , it is

ORDERED that the above action is DISMISSED with prejudice, pursuant to

agreement of counsel without costs.

MICHAEL E. KUNZ, Clerk of Court

BY: 

Sheila M. Jeffers 

 Deputy Clerk

Civ 2 (8/2000)

41(b).frm

Case 2:02-cv-04353-CRW Document 20 Filed 08/25/2003 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:05-cv-01351-RK Document 5 Filed 05/25/05 Page 1 of 39
Case 2:05-cv-01351-RK Document 5 Filed 05/25/05 Page 2 of 39
Case 2:05-cv-01351-RK Document 5 Filed 05/25/05 Page 3 of 39
Case 2:05-cv-01351-RK Document 5 Filed 05/25/05 Page 4 of 39
Case 2:05-cv-01351-RK Document 5 Filed 05/25/05 Page 5 of 39
Case 2:05-cv-01351-RK Document 5 Filed 05/25/05 Page 6 of 39
Case 2:05-cv-01351-RK Document 5 Filed 05/25/05 Page 7 of 39
Case 2:05-cv-01351-RK Document 5 Filed 05/25/05 Page 8 of 39
Case 2:05-cv-01351-RK Document 5 Filed 05/25/05 Page 9 of 39
Case 2:05-cv-01351-RK Document 5 Filed 05/25/05 Page 10 of 39
Case 2:05-cv-01351-RK Document 5 Filed 05/25/05 Page 11 of 39
Case 2:05-cv-01351-RK Document 5 Filed 05/25/05 Page 12 of 39
Case 2:05-cv-01351-RK Document 5 Filed 05/25/05 Page 13 of 39
Case 2:05-cv-01351-RK Document 5 Filed 05/25/05 Page 14 of 39
Case 2:05-cv-01351-RK Document 5 Filed 05/25/05 Page 15 of 39
Case 2:05-cv-01351-RK Document 5 Filed 05/25/05 Page 16 of 39
Case 2:05-cv-01351-RK Document 5 Filed 05/25/05 Page 17 of 39
Case 2:05-cv-01351-RK Document 5 Filed 05/25/05 Page 18 of 39
Case 2:05-cv-01351-RK Document 5 Filed 05/25/05 Page 19 of 39
Case 2:05-cv-01351-RK Document 5 Filed 05/25/05 Page 20 of 39
Case 2:05-cv-01351-RK Document 5 Filed 05/25/05 Page 21 of 39
Case 2:05-cv-01351-RK Document 5 Filed 05/25/05 Page 22 of 39
Case 2:05-cv-01351-RK Document 5 Filed 05/25/05 Page 23 of 39
Case 2:05-cv-01351-RK Document 5 Filed 05/25/05 Page 24 of 39
Case 2:05-cv-01351-RK Document 5 Filed 05/25/05 Page 25 of 39
Case 2:05-cv-01351-RK Document 5 Filed 05/25/05 Page 26 of 39
Case 2:05-cv-01351-RK Document 5 Filed 05/25/05 Page 27 of 39
Case 2:05-cv-01351-RK Document 5 Filed 05/25/05 Page 28 of 39
Case 2:05-cv-01351-RK Document 5 Filed 05/25/05 Page 29 of 39
Case 2:05-cv-01351-RK Document 5 Filed 05/25/05 Page 30 of 39
Case 2:05-cv-01351-RK Document 5 Filed 05/25/05 Page 31 of 39
Case 2:05-cv-01351-RK Document 5 Filed 05/25/05 Page 32 of 39
Case 2:05-cv-01351-RK Document 5 Filed 05/25/05 Page 33 of 39
Case 2:05-cv-01351-RK Document 5 Filed 05/25/05 Page 34 of 39
Case 2:05-cv-01351-RK Document 5 Filed 05/25/05 Page 35 of 39
Case 2:05-cv-01351-RK Document 5 Filed 05/25/05 Page 36 of 39
Case 2:05-cv-01351-RK Document 5 Filed 05/25/05 Page 37 of 39
Case 2:05-cv-01351-RK Document 5 Filed 05/25/05 Page 38 of 39
Case 2:05-cv-01351-RK Document 5 Filed 05/25/05 Page 39 of 39
Exhibit 99.1

 Statement Furnished Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
                              18 U.S.C Section 1350

      The undersigned, Kim S. Price, is the President and Chief Executive
Officer of Citizens South Banking Corporation (the "Company").

      This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the
Company of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2003 (the "Report").

      By execution of this statement, I certify that:

            A)    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
                  U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and

            B)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
                  covered by the Report.

      This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so
that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that this
statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.


May 13, 2003                             /s/ Kim S. Price
----------------                         -----------------------------------
Dated                                    Kim S. Price
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer


                                       21
<PAGE>



                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

March 25, 2004



                   Management Report on Internal Control Over
                Processing and Reporting Relating to Securitized
                        Automobile Financing Receivables
                ------------------------------------------------

Management of the Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A. (the "Bank"), as servicer of
Chase Manhattan Auto Owner Trusts, is responsible for establishing and
maintaining effective internal control over processing and reporting relating to
securitized automobile financing receivables, which is designed to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the proper processing and reporting relating to
securitized automobile financing receivables. The Bank's internal control
contains self-monitoring mechanisms, and actions are taken to correct
deficiencies as they are identified.

There are inherent limitations in any internal control, including the
possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of controls.
Accordingly, even effective internal control can provide only reasonable
assurance with respect to processing and reporting relating to securitized
automobile financing receivables. Further, because of changes in conditions, the
effectiveness of internal control may vary over time.

Management of the Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A., as servicer of Chase Manhattan
Auto Owner Trusts, assessed its internal control over processing and reporting
relating to securitized automobile financing receivables for the 12 months ended
December 31, 2003 in relation to the criteria for effective internal control
established in "Internal Control - Integrated Framework" issued by the Committee
of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this
assessment, management believes that, the Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A., as
servicer of Chase Manhattan Auto Owner Trusts, maintained effective internal
control over processing and reporting relating to securitized automobile
financing receivables for the 12 months ended December 31, 2003, based on the
criteria for effective internal control established in "Internal Control -
Integrated Framework" issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission.



/s/ William V. Dobbins
------------------------------
William V. Dobbins, President
Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A.





/s/ Keith Schuck
------------------------------
Keith Schuck, SVP/CFO
Chase Manhattan Bank USA, N.A.
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-50808) of TECO Capital Trust I of our report dated February 28, 2003 relating to the financial statements, which appears in this Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our reportdated January 22, 2003, except for the information in Note U as to which the date is January 30, 2003, relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedule of TECO Energy, Inc., which appears in the TECO Energy, Inc. Form 10-K forthe year ended December 31, 2002. 

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

 

Tampa, Florida 

March 6, 2003
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6930

DIEUNIOUS CADEJUSTE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

WILLIAM WELCH, JR., in his individual and

official capacity; SHARMA MAHABIR; B. BRATTAN,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey II, Senior District

Judge. (CA-96-152-H)

Submitted: January 9, 1997 Decided: January 23, 1997

Before HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Dieunious Cadejuste, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Karp, Kevin Bock

Karpinski, ALLEN, JOHNSON, ALEXANDER & KARP, Baltimore, Maryland,

for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record

and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

Cadejuste v. Welch, No. CA-96-152-H (D. Md. May 16, 1996). We deny

Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel and dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Seth Horn, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of IQ Biometrix, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this
report is being prepared;

            b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

            c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

            a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

            b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date: November 14, 2003
                                                     /s/ Seth Horn
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                     Seth Horn
                                                     Chief Financial Officer




<PAGE>
**Exhibit 13.1**

**Certification**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)**

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), theundersigned officer of Allianz SE, a European Company (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that: 

The AnnualReport on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the “Report”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

Date: March 31, 2009