alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>



 AmerUs Group Co.
 Exhibit 11 - Statement Re:  Computation of Earnings Per Share

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                For The Three Months Ended March 31,
                                             -----------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            2002                                 2001
                                             ----------------------------------   ----------------------------------
                                                          Number of   Per Share                Number of   Per Share
                                             Net Income    Shares       Amount    Net Income     hares       Amount
                                             ----------------------------------   ----------------------------------
                                                               (in thousands, except per share amounts)
<S>                                          <C>          <C>         <C>         <C>          <C>         <C>
 Basic EPS
       Net Income from Continuing Operations $   24,458      41,350   $    0.59   $   19,458      29,973   $    0.65

 Effect of dilutive securities
       Options                                        -         511       (0.01)           -         309       (0.01)
       Warrants                                       -         108           -            -          83           -

                                             ----------------------------------   ----------------------------------
 Diluted EPS                                 $   24,458      41,969   $    0.58   $   19,458      30,365   $    0.64
                                             ==================================   ==================================

</TABLE>



                                       52
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1463 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1463

To amend the Financial Stability Act of 2010 to modify the term of the 
    independent member of the Financial Stability Oversight Council.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 28, 2017

 Mr. Crapo (for himself, Mr. Brown, Ms. Cortez Masto, Mr. Cotton, Mr. 
 Menendez, Mr. Perdue, Mr. Rounds, Mr. Scott, Mr. Tester, Mr. Tillis, 
 Mr. Van Hollen, Mr. Warner, and Ms. Warren) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, 
                       Housing, and Urban Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Financial Stability Act of 2010 to modify the term of the 
    independent member of the Financial Stability Oversight Council.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Financial Stability Oversight 
Council Insurance Member Continuity Act''.

SEC. 2. FINANCIAL STABILITY OVERSIGHT COUNCIL.

    Section 111(c) of the Financial Stability Act of 2010 (12 U.S.C. 
5321(c)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
            ``(4) Term of independent member.--Notwithstanding 
        paragraph (1), if a successor to the independent member of the 
        Council serving under subsection (b)(1)(J) is not appointed and 
        confirmed by the end of the term of service of such member, 
        such member may continue to serve until the earlier of--
                    ``(A) 18 months after the date on which the term of 
                service ends; or
                    ``(B) the date on which a successor to such member 
                is appointed and confirmed.''.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

: CIVIL ACTION

Trina Herring, et al 

:

 v.

:

No. 02-4391

:

Michael McCrea, et al 

:

NOTICE OF ARBITRATION HEARING

Please take note that the above-captioned civil action case has been scheduled for

ARBITRATION at 9:30 am on Tuesday, January 14, 2002. PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS

ARBITRATION HEARING WILL BE HELD IN THE ROBERT N.C. NIX BUILDING, 900

MARKET ST., PHILADELPHIA, PA 19107. REPORT TO ROOM 339 FOR YOUR ROOM

ASSIGNMENT. NOTE: Arbitrators shall not participate in settlement discussions.

Michael E. Kunz

Clerk of Court

By: 

Tashia C. Irving

Deputy Clerk

Phone:267-299-7071

Date:September 17, 2002

Copies: Michael Beck, Courtroom Deputy to Judge Bruce W. Kauffman

Docket Clerk - Case File

Counsel: Michael S. Ringold, Esq.

Charles W. Sweeney, III, Esq.

ARB2.FRM

Case 2:02-cv-04391-BWK Document 4 Filed 09/17/2002 Page 1 of 1
**Credit Reform Case Study Update Project**

**Phase II document updates to the following:**

· **Guide for Basic Accounting and Reporting for Foreclosed Property in Federal Credit Programs Effective Fiscal Year 2017**

· **Guide for Basic Accounting and Reporting For Direct Loan Programs Without Collateral in Federal Credit Program Effective Fiscal Year 2017**

**Update accounting transactions:**

· **Replace USSGL 579000 – Other Financing Sources with  USSGL 579100 – Adjustment to Financing Sources – Credit Reform**

· **When reporting USSGL 579100 agencies should use the Federal/Nonfederal attribute domain value of “F” .**

**Transaction Codes Created or Updated:**

· **Effective Fiscal 2017, affected Transaction Codes that include USSGL 579100.**

**-A204**

**-A206**

**-A208**

**-D149**

**-D150**

· **Effective Fiscal 2017, affected Transaction Codes updated to include language clarifying their use in Credit Reform situations or to include USSGL accounts used in transactions presented in the case studies:**

**-A202**

**-B105**

**-C118**

**-D147**

****

Credit Reform Case Studies	Page 1 of 1	IRC Handout  April 20, 2017
Exhibit 32.1

                      Statement of Chief Executive Officer
            Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

      The undersigned, Kim S. Price, is the President and Chief Executive
Officer of Citizens South Banking Corporation (the "Company").

      This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the
Company of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2003 (the "Report").

      By execution of this statement, I certify that:

            A)    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
                  U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and

            B)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
                  covered by the Report.

      This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so
that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that this
statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.

August 13, 2003                           /s/ Kim S. Price
------------------                        --------------------------------------
Dated                                     Kim S. Price
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer


                                       23
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Home Loan Financial Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date of this Certification
(the "Report"), I, Robert C. Hamilton, the President of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ Robert C. Hamilton
---------------------------------------------
Robert C. Hamilton, President

Date:  November 15, 2004

                                                                             27.
N OTE : This order is nonprecedential. 

# United States Court of Appeals **for the Federal Circuit**

__________________________

ROBERT BOSCH LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v. PYLON MANUFACTURING CORP., Defendant-Cross-Appellant.

__________________________ 2011-1363, -1364

__________________________ Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware in case no. 08-CV-0542, Judge Sue L. Robinson.

__________________________

Before R ADER , Chief Judge , N EWMAN , L OURIE , B RYSON , L INN , D YK , P ROST , M OORE , O’M ALLEY , R EYNA , and W ALLACH , Circuit Judges

. P ER C URIAM

. O R D E R This case was argued before a panel of this court on July 9, 2012. Thereafter, a poll of the judges in regular active service was conducted to determine whether the jurisdictional issues raised by this appeal should be heard en banc. Upon consideration thereof,ROBERT BOSCH v. PYLON MFG CORP 2

I T I S O RDERED T HAT : (1) The court by its own action grants a hearing en banc. (2) The parties are requested to file new en banc briefs limited to the following questions: a) Does 28 U.S.C. § 1292(c)(2) confer jurisdiction on this Court to entertain appeals from patent infringement liability determinations when a trial on damages has not yet occurred? b) Does 28 U.S.C. § 1292(c)(2) confer jurisdiction on this Court to entertain appeals from patent infringement liability determinations when willfulness issues are outstanding and remain undecided? (3) An original and thirty copies of the new en banc briefs shall be filed, and two copies of each en banc brief shall be served on opposing counsel. Plaintiff-Appellant’s en banc brief is due 40 days from the date of this order. Defendant-Cross-Appellant’s en banc response brief is due within 40 days of service of Plaintiff-Appellant’s new en banc brief, and Plaintiff-Appellant’s reply brief is due within 14 days of service of Defendant-Cross-Appellant’s response brief. Principal briefs shall not exceed 7,000 words, and the reply brief sh all not exceed 3,500 words. (4) Briefs of amici curiae will be entertained. Any such amici briefs may be f iled without consent and leave of court, and shall not exceed 7,000 words, but otherwise must comply with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 29 and Federal Circuit Rule 29. Any such briefs shall be limited to the questions above. (5) Oral argument will be scheduled at a later date.ROBERT BOSCH v. PYLON MFG CORP 3

F OR T HE C OURT

August 7, 2012

—————————— Date /s/ Jan Horbaly

—————————— Jan Horbaly Clerk

cc: Mark A. Hannemann, Esq. Mark A. Pals, Esq.
No. 66757.

#### General Systems Service, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 61/7579 (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of self-adhesive tapes similar in all material respects to those the subject of *General Systems Service, Inc.*v. *United States*(46 Cust. Ct. 222, C.D. 2259), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 10.13

                             DEMAND PROMISSORY NOTE


$145,000                       Encino, California                    May 15,2001
                                  (City, State)

FOR VALUE RECEIVED,  the undersigned,  Charles A. Lesser ("Lesser"),  promise to
pay, on demand, to CBCom, Inc., or order, at 16830 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 211,
Encino,  CA 91436  (CBCOM),  the sum of One Hundred Forty Five Thousand  Dollars
($145,000) with interest at 5% per annum thereon.

This Promissory Note is collateralized by, and in the same amount, as salary and
other  compensation  due and  payable by CBCom,  Inc.  to Lesser as of the above
date.  This note will be  reduced  by any  amount of said  compensation  that is
forgiven by Lesser, and any accrued interest will be waived.

When  demand or order is made,  Lesser  may apply any  remaining  amount of said
compensation  under the terms  described  above,  with any balance being due and
payable by Lesser.

In the  event of  default,  the sole  remedy  for  CBCom,  Inc.  will be for the
collateralized  portion of said  compensation  that  remains  due and payable to
Lesser.  Each maker shall be jointly and severally liable hereon and each maker,
co-maker and guarantor  consents to renewals,  replacements,  and  extensions of
time  for  payment  hereon  before,  at,  or  after  maturity  consents  to  the
acceptance, release or substitution of securities for this note.



ACCEPTED BY:

-----------------------------------
Signature


-----------------------------------   -----------------------------------
Signature                             Address


-----------------------------------   -----------------------------------
Title                                 SSA# or Federal ID#
Department of Energy

Water Heater Energy Conservation Standards

Public Hearing Agenda

June 20, 2000

9:00 - 9:05 am Opening - Terry Logee, DOE

9:05 - 9:15 am Agenda review and overview - Doug Brookman

9:15 - 10:15 am Participants' general remarks - Not issue specific

10:15 - 10:30 am Break

Discussion of key issues. Participants to comment on each issue.

10:30 - 11:15 am Venting systems

A discussion of costs, limiting factors, and application of venting

systems for gas water heaters with various levels of Recovery Efficiency.

11:15 - 11:45 am Size constraints

A discussion of the problems caused by installing water heaters with

thicker insulation into small spaces as well as the effects of changing the

heating element or burner input, and impacts on water heater

dimensions and costs.

11:45 am - 12:00 pm Classes

A discussion on the proposal for new classes for propane water heaters,

lowboy and tabletop water heaters and whether standards should apply

to instantaneous water heaters.

12:00 - 1:00 pm Lunch - (on your own)

1:00 - 2:00 pm Costs and Efficiency Improvements

A discussion of costs and efficiency improvements: heat traps; venting

and flue baffles for gas water heaters; and tank-bottom insulation on

electric water heaters.

2:00 - 2:15 pm Daily hot water usage

A discussion of RECS-97, hot water usage and impacts of clothes

washer standards.

2:15 - 2:30 pm Break

-1-

EE-RM-97-900 COMMENT 120BB
2:30 - 2:45 pm Oil-fired water heaters

A discussion of whether cost-effective improvements to oil-fired water

heaters are possible.

2:45 - 3:30 pm Blowing Agents

A discussion of the availability, cost, schedule of availability and Global

Warming Potential (GWP) of insulation blowing agents, including HFC245fa.

3:30 - 3:45 pm EF rating

A discussion of potential EF over-ratings and the results of WATSIM.

3:45 - 4:00 pm Market Shares

A discussion of the current and projected market shares of different fuel

types.

4:00 - 4:15 pm Markups

A discussion of the methodology used and the different markups for gas

and electric water heaters.

4:15 - 4:30 pm Life-cycle-cost analysis

A discussion on life-cycle-cost analysis issues.

4:30 - 4:45 pm Effective date of new standard

A discussion on whether the new standard is effective three orfive years

after promulgation.

4:45 - 5:00 pm Closing statements

5:00 pm Adjourn

-2-

EE-RM-97-900 COMMENT 120BB
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-40224

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JESUS HERNAN DE LA PAZ,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 1:14-CR-744-1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Jesus Hernan De La Paz

raises an argument that is foreclosed by United States v. Betancourt, 586 F.3d 

303, 308-09 (5th Cir. 2009), which held that knowledge of drug type and 

quantity is not an element of a 21 U.S.C. § 841 offense. Accordingly, the motion 

for summary disposition is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court 

is AFFIRMED.

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

October 22, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 15-40224 Document: 00513243191 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/22/2015
IPAC Operational Metrics for September 2019

Volume by Transaction Type

Dollar Amount] % of Total Dollar Amount] Number of Transactions] _ % of Total Number of Transactions|
Fiduciary (Investment & Borrowing) 15,061,597,664,014| 99.74% 34,042 8.73%|
Buy/Sell 33,389,347,209] 0.22% 145,677| 90.55%
Benefits (RITS) 5,630,673,735| 0.04% 436| 0.27%|
Check Aftermath (TRACS) 132,326,398] 0.00% 721 | 0.45% |
Zero Dollar o| 0.00% | 0.00%|
Grand Total - September 2019 15,100,750,011,356| 00.00% 160,876| 10.00%
Grand Total - August 2019 16,178, 106,031,924| 10.00% 130, 10.00%
‘August to September Change
Percentage Change
Grand Total - September 2018
‘Sept 2018 to Sept 2019 Change

Percentage Change
Independent Accountant's Report

 

The Board of Directors First Union National Bank:

We have examined management's assertion about First Union National Bank's (the Bank) compliance with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's (MBA's) *Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers*(USAP), except for minimum servicing standards Vand VI.1., which the MBA has interpreted as being inapplicable to the servicing of commercial and multifamily loans, as of and for the year ended December 31, 2000 included in the accompanying management assertion. Management is responsible for the Bank's compliance with those minimum servicing standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the Bank's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Bank's compliance with the applicable minimum servicing standards and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legal determination on the Bank's compliance with the applicable minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that the Bank has complied in all material respects with the aforementioned applicable minimum servicing standards as of and for the year ended December 31, 2000 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

KPMG, LLP**February 9, 2001**
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1329 

To amend title 31, United States Code, to permit the Secretary of the 

Treasury to locate and recover certain assets of the United States Government. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 8, 2017 

Mrs. FISCHER (for herself and Mr. MANCHIN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend title 31, United States Code, to permit the Secretary of the Treasury to locate and recover certain 

assets of the United States Government. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘REcovering and COl5 lecting Unclaimed federal Property Act of 2017’’ or the 

6 ‘‘RECOUP Act’’. 


asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1329 IS

1 SEC. 2. INCREASE AND STREAMLINE RECOVERY OF UN2 CLAIMED ASSETS OWED TO THE UNITED 

3 STATES. 

4 Section 3711 of title 31, United States Code, is 

5 amended by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(j)(1) The Secretary of the Treasury (referred to in 

7 this subsection as the ‘‘Secretary’’) may locate and recover 

8 assets of the United States Government on behalf of any 

9 executive, judicial, or legislative agency in accordance with 

10 such procedures as the Secretary considers appropriate. 

11 ‘‘(2) Notwithstanding any other provision of law con12 cerning the depositing or collection of Federal payments, 

13 including section 3302(b), the Secretary may retain a por14 tion of the amounts recovered under this subsection to 

15 cover the administrative and operational costs of the Sec16 retary associated with locating and recovering assets of 

17 the United States Government. 

18 ‘‘(3) The Secretary shall use any funds appropriated 

19 to the Secretary to carry out this subsection. 

20 ‘‘(4) Any savings associated with carrying out this 

21 subsection shall be transferred to the general fund of the 

22 Treasury for the purpose of deficit reduction.’’. 

Æ 


asabaliauskas on DSKBBXCHB2PROD with BILLS
No. 66289.

#### Norman G. Jensen, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 59/6606, etc. (Duluth).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of mink food grinders similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 62415, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 60779.

#### Eitinger Bead Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 288894-K (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of opaque white glass stones the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 59105, except that said stones were not faceted, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 216 (Thursday, November 9, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 77374]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-24727]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 9, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 2, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] Contract 
92 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, 
Docket Nos. MC2024-36, CP2024-36.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2023-24727 Filed 11-8-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P