alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(Reap. Dec. 10354)

Entry No. 851027.

#### Manhattan Novelty Corp. *v.*United States

(Decided October 17, 1962)

*Lane, Young & Foco*for the plaintiff.

*Joseph D. Guilfoyle,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Ford, Judge:

The appeal for reappraisement listed above has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between counsel for tbe parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise covered by the above appeal for reappraisement consists of radios manufactured in and exported from Japan to the United States.

> That on or about the date of exportation of the said merchandise, the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold or, in the absence of sales, offered for sale in the principal markets of Japan, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, was the appraised value, less the buying commission as shown on the invoice.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the above appeal for re-appraisement may be submitted for decision upon this stipulation.

Accepting this stipulation as a statement of facts, I find that the involved merchandise was entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption on or after February 27, 1958, and is not identified in the final list published by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to the *420Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54521, effective February 27, 1958, and I bold export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved and that such statutory value is the appraised value, less the buying commission, as shown on the invoice.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****New withholding tables for ...**
 
SuDoc Number:T 22.44/2:15-T/

Item Number:0964-B (online)
CGP systemNumber:000562221
 
2001 | 2003
 
September 24, 2020
**Exhibit 23.1**

 

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (No 333-125917) andForm S-8 (No. 333-82012) of ZymoGenetics, Inc. of our report dated March 10, 2006, relating to the financial statements, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting and the effectivenessof internal control over financial reporting, which appear in this Form 10-K. 

 

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP 

 

Seattle, Washington 

March 10, 2006
1 From: David Putney [Putney.David@epamail.epa.gov] Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 2:28 PM To: Michael.Palazzolo@alcoa.com; ksands@centuryky.com; kisnerj@noralnm.com; jvanmatre@centurywv.com; danny.carroll@riotinto.com; kisnerj@noralnm.com; John.Reggi@ormet.com; Henk.VanDerMeyden@alcoa.com; Kathryn.Mitchell@alcoa.com; Patricia.Bilskis@alcoa.com; nathan.rufa@alcoa.com; Terry.Blodgett@alcoa.com; chris.allen@alcoa.com; david.hulse@alcoa.com Cc: cjohnson@aluminum.org; Bahner, Mark A.; Green, David A. Subject: Sulfur content of anode coke

Hello all,

Once again, thank you so much for taking the time to re spond to the information collection request (ICR) dated April 25, 2011 concerning the primary aluminum operations conducted at your facility. That ICR requested information on the typical sulfur content of the coke utilized to generate anodes in your facil ities. While reviewing the ICR responses I noticed that (I believe mainly due to the poor wording of the ICR question itself) they do not provide all the information I need to properly complete the ongoing primary aluminum RTR project with regards to the s ulfur content of anode coke. Please provide the following information for the anode coke utilized in your facility:

The range of sulfur content in the coke utilized to make anodes used in the reduction cells over the last year of operation.

The highest sulfur content in the coke utilized to make anodes used in the reduction cells at any time during the last 10 years.

The lowest sulfur content anode coke that you believe you could consistently obtain in sufficient quantities to operate your facility at capacity, long term (e.g. over the next 10 years).

Also, as a reminder, if you have not already responded to my previous emails regarding new versus existing pitch storage tanks (email dated 06/22/11), applicability of the NESHAP standards during periods of shutdown and/or malfunction (email dated 05/11/11), or methods used to conduct visible emissions monitoring (email dated 05/10/11) then please do also provide me responses to those information requests.

As a reminder - do no t email anything you consider confidential business information (CBI) to me. If you believe that you would be required to send me CBI in order to answer any of the questions listed above then please contact me directly so we can discuss the issue.

Please provide your responses to the above questions to me by 07/15/11 (two weeks from today). If you would need more time to provide these responses then please contact me directly so we can discuss an alternate

schedule.2 Thanks again,

David Putney, Environmen tal Engineer U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Sector Policies and Programs
Division 109 T.W. Alexander Drive, RTP, NC 27711 Mail Drop D243

- 02 Ph: (919) 541

- 2016 Fax: (919) 541

- 3207 Email: putney.david@epa.g ov
1 IRC Handout August 6, 2015

Proposed General Fund USSGL Accounts

Fiscal Year 2016

The following is a proposed new USSGL account identified as critical for General Fund future state implementation. This account

does not currently exist, but is necessary to allow the General Fund to properly account for and eliminate intragovernmental 

transactions (IGT). The creation of this new account will enable the General Fund to comply with GAAP by capturing increases and 

decreases to net position at the transaction level. Additionally, this account will allow for proper IGT eliminations in compliance with 

GAAP in compilation of the Financial Report of the U.S. Government (FR).

New USSGL Account 570005

Account Title: Appropriations – Expended

Account Number: 570005

Normal Balance: Debit

Definition: The amount of General Fund-financed appropriations used by agencies during the fiscal year when goods and services are 

received or benefits are provided. This account corresponds to Federal reporting entity’s Expended Appropriations (USSGL account 

570000). This account is for the General Fund of the Treasury use only.

Justification: Enables the General Fund to properly account for appropriations that have been financed by the General Fund. 

Establishes an offset to agencies 570000 to enable proper IGT eliminations. Enables the General Fund to account for appropriations as 

financing sources, in compliance with SFFAS 7, par. 71 & 72.

Example Scenario: An agency records a delivered obligation – unpaid. 

Federal Program Agency General Fund

Proprietary Proprietary

610000 Operating Expenses 10,000

 211000 Accounts Payable 10,000

310700 Unexpended Appropriations - Used 10,000 570005 Appropriations - Expended 10,000

 570000 Expended Appropriations 10,000 320700 Appropriations - Used 10,000
2 IRC Handout August 6, 2015

Attribute Table:

No. USSGL Account Title Anticipated Budg/

Prop

Norm 

Bal

Begin

/End

Debit/

Credit

Auth 

Type 

Code

Apport 

Cat

Apport 

Cat B

570005 Appropriations – Expended N P D E D/C

Program 

Rpt Cat

Reimb 

Flag

Year 

of 

BA

Reduction 

Type Fund Type

Reporting 

Type 

Code

Financing 

Account

Code

TAS 

Status

Trans. 

Code

GA U N U N

Avail 

Time

BEA Cat Borrow 

Source

Budgetary 

Impact

Indicator

Cohort 

Yr

Cust/ 

Noncust

Exch/ 

Nonexch

Fed/ 

Non

Fed

Trading 

Ptnr

Trading 

Ptnr 

Main

PY 

Adj

Program 

Indicator

F ### ####
(Reap. Dec. 10308)

Entry No. 497, etc.

#### Plywood & Door Manufacturers Corporation *v.*United States

(Decided August 6, 1962)

*Richard Van Steenburgh*for the plaintiff.

*Joseph D. Guilfoyle,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

The merchandise the subject of the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in schedule “A,” attached hereto, consists of birch plywood, exported from Finland in the years 1953, 1954,1955, and 1956.

Counsel for the parties have submitted said appeals for reappraisement for decision upon written stipulation, on the basis of which I find that export value, as defined in section 402(d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis for the determination of the values of the birch plywood involved and that such values were those set forth in column “4” of said schedule “A,” packed, less the prorated amounts of the nondutiable charges, set forth directly after the description of *363tbe merchandise in each said reappraisement case set forth in schedule “A.”

Judgment will issue accordingly.
No. 51956.

#### Libreria Lozano et al. v. United States,

petitions 6587-R, etc. (Laredo).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

The merchandise was entered and appraised at values which included a 42 percent discount. An appeal for reappraisement was taken and it was held that the discount was not freely offered to all purchasers and that the dutiable values were those stated in the shipper’s price lists, without any discount. *(United States*v. *Ignacio E. Lozano,*17 Cust. Ct. 279, Reap. Dec. 6316.) At the trial the accountant-auditor of Librería Lozano testified that at the time of purchase the firm had just started to import this type of merchandise; that a 12 percent discount was given Mr. Lozano to compensate him for his effort in introducing the product and advertising it through the newspapers; that he thought the shipper had some agents in other territories and that anyone under the same circumstances as his firm would receive the same discount; and that he gave all the information he had to the customs officials through the broker before entry. The customs broker testified that he went into the question of the 12 percent discount very thoroughly, as to why it was given and as to whether it was a freely offered discount; that he had the impression that the shipper was giving this discount to others in other territories; and that subsequent entries were amended because he found out through the appraiser that the discount was not freely offered. On the record presented the court found that the petitioners acted without intention to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the case or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petitions were therefore granted.
EX-10.70





 Exhibit 10.70 

Domino’s Pizza, Inc. 

Independent Director Compensation Schedule 

The following table sets forth the current compensation received by independent directors of Domino’s Pizza, Inc. for service on the Board of Directors,
Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee and Inclusion & Diversity Committee: 
  

					
	 Director Compensation Summary
	 
	 Annual Retainer
	  	Amount	 
	 Board of Directors
	  	$	80,000	 
	 Audit Committee
	  			
	 Chairperson
	  	$	30,000	 
	 Member
	  	$	15,000	 
	 Compensation Committee
	  			
	 Chairperson
	  	$	20,000	 
	 Member
	  	$	10,000	 
	 Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee
	  			
	 Chairperson
	  	$	15,000	 
	 Member
	  	$	10,000	 
	 Inclusion & Diversity Committee
	  			
	 Chairperson
	  	$	15,000	 
	 Member
	  	$	10,000	 
		
	 Annual Equity Award
	  	Value	 
	 Target grant date fair value
	  	$	160,000
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

 

 

FELIX D. WHITTINGTON,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

DONALD VAUGHN, et al.,

 Defendants.

 CIVIL ACTION

 NO. 02-4346

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of September, 2002, it is hereby ORDERED that

the attached communication dated August 13, 2002, shall be filed by the Clerk.

BY THE COURT:

 

_______________________________________

MARVIN KATZ, S.J.

Case 2:02-cv-04346-MK Document 12 Filed 09/04/2002 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

LEXINGTON INSURANCE COMPANY : CIVIL ACTION

:

 v. :

:

DAVID FORREST, ET AL. : NO. 02-4435

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of January, 2005, it is Ordered

that a follow-up TELEPHONE CONFERENCE will be held on Thursday,

January 20, 2005 at 2:00 p.m.. The conference will be initiated

by Edward P. Krugman, Esq.

ATTEST: or BY THE COURT

S/Anita B. Brody

BY: 

 Deputy Clerk Anita B. Brody, J.

Civ 12 (9/83)

Copies via ECF on _________ to: Copies VIA U.S. MAIL on ____________ to:

Edward P. Krugman, Esq. Emily A. Poler, Esq.

Kevin Dooley Kent, Esq. Glenn F. Rosenblum, Esq.

Nicholas M. Centrella, Esq. Ira J. Dembrow, Esq.

David L. Pennington, Esq. Jeffrey R. Lerman, Esq.

Thomas M. Kittredge, Esq. Kevin Burke, Esq.

Heather E. Rennie, Esq. Miguel A. Villarreal, Esq.

Neil G. Epstein, Esq. Scott M. Mory, Esq.

Conrad O. Kattner, Esq. Edward M. Dunham, Jr., Esq. 

 Shannon Hampton Sutherland, Esq.

 James J. Rohn, Esq.

 John D. Gordan, Esq.

 John N. Thomas, Esq.

 Alexander Kerr, Esq.

 Beverly Y. Lu, Esq.

 Charles A. Adamek, Esq.

 Jeffrey D. Farrow, Esq.

 Mona Z. Hanna, Esq.

 Sanford Louis Michelman, Esq.

Case 2:02-cv-04435-AB Document 119 Filed 01/04/2005 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                            9

<LEGEND>
     THIS SCHEDULE  CONTAINS SUMMARY  FINANCIAL  INFORMATION  EXTRACTED FROM THE
     ANNUAL  REPORT ON FORM 10-QSB AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE
     TO SUCH FINANCIAL INFORMATION.
</LEGEND>

<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                             SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                  MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                            807
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                            525
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                  140
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                    0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                     6,435
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                              0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                0
<LOANS>                                        44,807
<ALLOWANCE>                                       419
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 55,966
<DEPOSITS>                                     43,305
<SHORT-TERM>                                    4,500
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                               643
<LONG-TERM>                                         0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               0
<PREFERRED>                                         0
<COMMON>                                           66
<OTHER-SE>                                      7,452
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 55,966
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 1,975
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                 195
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   15
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                2,185
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              1,177
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                106
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                             902
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                      30
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 (7)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                   773
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   180
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                        117
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     0
<CHANGES>                                           0
<NET-INCOME>                                      117
<EPS-BASIC>                                       .25
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .25
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   3.09
<LOANS-NON>                                        67
<LOANS-PAST>                                      476
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                    0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                     0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                  389
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                       0
<RECOVERIES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                 419
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                              419
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                             0



</TABLE>
II 

Calendar No. 214 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1395 

[Report No. 115–149] 

To revise the boundaries of certain John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources 

System units in Delaware. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 21, 2017 

Mr. CARPER (for himself and Mr. COONS) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public 

Works 

SEPTEMBER 7, 2017 

Reported by Mr. BARRASSO, without amendment 

A BILL 

To revise the boundaries of certain John H. Chafee Coastal 

Barrier Resources System units in Delaware. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPLACEMENT OF JOHN H. CHAFEE COASTAL 

4 BARRIER RESOURCES SYSTEM MAP. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The map subtitled ‘‘Delaware 

6 Seashore Unit DE–07P, North Bethany Beach Unit 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1395 RS

1 H01’’ and dated December 6, 2013, that is included in 

2 the set of maps entitled ‘‘Coastal Barrier Resources Sys3 tem’’ referred to in section 4(a) of the Coastal Barrier 

4 Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(a)) and relating to certain 

5 John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System units 

6 in the State of Delaware, is replaced by the map entitled 

7 ‘‘Delaware Seashore Unit DE–07/DE–07P, North Beth8 any Beach Unit H01’’ and dated March 18, 2016. 

9 (b) AVAILABILITY.—The Secretary of the Interior 

10 shall keep the replacement map referred to in subsection 

11 (a) on file and available for inspection in accordance with 

12 section 4(b) of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 

13 U.S.C. 3503(b)). 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS

sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 214 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1395 

[Report No. 115–149] 

A BILL 

To revise the boundaries of certain John H. Chafee 

ware. Coastal Barrier Resources System units in DelaSEPTEMBER 7, 2017 

Reported without amendment 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CRIMINAL ACTION 

v. 

RASAN TOWNSEND No. 05-51 

ORDER 

AND NOW, this 7th day of January, 2021, upon consideration ofRasan Townsend's pro 

se Emergency Motion for Reduction in Sentence Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(l)(A)(i) (Doc. 

No. 70) and the Government's Response in Opposition (Doc. No. 72), it is ORDERED that the 

Motion (Doc. No. 72) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDCE. Mr. Townsend may renew his 

motion after he has properly documented that he exhausted his request for compassionate release 

with the Bureau of Prisons. 

1 

Case 2:05-cr-00051-GEKP Document 74 Filed 01/07/21 Page 1 of 1
No. 64058.

protests 135531-K/12915 and 135532-K/12912 (New Orleans).

#### Distilled Liquors Import Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS4824 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
<PAGE>
                                                                  EXHIBIT 99-58

                          MONTHLY SERVICER CERTIFICATE

Pursuant to Section 4.01(d)(ii) of the Securitization Property Servicing
Agreement, dated as of March 9, 2001 (the "Agreement"), between The Detroit
Edison Company, as servicer (the "Servicer") and The Detroit Edison
Securitization Funding LLC, the Servicer does hereby certify as follows:

Capitalized terms used herein have their respective meanings as set forth in the
Agreement.

For the Monthly Period:  September 2004
                         --------------

1.     BILLINGS:

a)    Monthly kWh Consumption:    4,621,535,086
                                  -------------
b)    Applicable SB Charge:           $ 0.00374
                                      ---------
c)    Total SB Charge Amount Invoiced this Month
      (Net of .5% uncollectible factor):                        $ 17,191,867.87
                                                                ---------------
d)    Cumulative SB Charge Amount Invoiced this
      Remittance Period:                                       $ 139,279,796.53
                                                               ----------------

2.     REMITTANCES:

a)    Weighted Average Days outstanding:                                51
                                                                        --
b)    Total Amount Remitted this Month:                    $ 16,516,779.77
                                                           ---------------
c)    Cumulative Amount Remitted this Remittance Period:   $131,092,117.88
                                                           ---------------

3.     BALANCES ON SUBACCOUNTS (AT END OF MONTHLY PERIOD):

a)    Collection Account Balance:                 $ 16,497,656.24
                                                  ---------------
b)    Reserve Subaccount Balance:                        $ 587.54
                                                        ---------
c)    Series Overcollateralization Subaccount Balance:    $198.14
                                                          -------
d)    Series Capital Subaccount Balance:           $ 7,398,747.99
                                                   --------------

Executed as of October 13, 2004.

                                    THE DETROIT EDISON COMPANY
                                    as Servicer

                                    By:   /s/  Peter B. Oleksiak
                                        -----------------------------------
                                    Name:  Peter B. Oleksiak
                                    Title:  Director and Assistant Controller