alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 10.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

In connection with the annual report of Gemplus International S.A. (the
Company) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2002 (the Report),
I, Alex Mandl, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



| |                                                                                                                                                         
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1.  the annual report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                        
|
| | 2.  the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

|                    |  |                                   
|------------------- |  | ----------------------------------
|Date: July 15, 2003 |  |                                   
|                    |  | /s/    Alex Mandl                 
|                    |  |                                   
|                    |  | Alex Mandl
Chief Executive Officer

-195-
SERVED: SEPTEMBER 13, 2013 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

OFFICE OF HEARINGS 

WASHINGTON, DC 

IN. THE MATTER OF 

TYLER PENNYWITT 

FAA DOCKET NO. [TO BE ASSIGNED] 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

FDMS NO. FAA-2013-0716 

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING 

71iJ"' --:-··) jL /' .-.. 2 _.., ._ u {' \ ,. -

This proceeding (heretofore designated as Case No. 2012S0150128) has been assigned to 

Administrative Law Judge J.E. Sullivan. All future pleadings and other communications 

regarding this proceeding shall be served on the Judge, the FAA Hearing Docket, and the other 

persons on the attached Service List. 

Attachment - Service List 
SERVICE LIST 

ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, S.W. 

Washington, DC 20591 

Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2Wl 0001 

ONE COPY 

Christopher R. Stevenson, Complainant 's Counsel 

Attorney, Office ofthe Regional Counsel, AS0-7 

Southern Region 

Federal Aviation Administration 

P.O. Box 20636 

Atlanta, GA 30320 

TEL: 404-305-5200 

FAX: 404-305-5223 

Tyler Pennywitt, Respondent 

4483 Hanover Park Drive 

Jacksonville, FL 32224 

Mitchell A. Stone, Respondent's Counsel 

Stone-Lockett 

Marsh Landing Business Park 

15401 The Greens Way 

Jacksonville Beach, FL 32250 

TEL: 904-858-9818 

FAX: 904-858-9819 

Honorable Judge J.E. Sullivan, Administrative Law Judge 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. (Ell-310) 

Washington, DC 20590 

TEL: 202-366-2132 

FAX: 202-366-7536 

FDMS No. FAA-2013-0716 

(Civil Penalty Action) 

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person or by expedited courier, use the following address: Federal 

Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000, Washington, 

DC 20591, Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430. 

-2-
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WIZKIDS CREATIONS CO.

C.A. 02-4358

District Court Docket Number

vs.

C.B.S. INC. ET AL

Notice of Appeal Filed 2/27/03

Court Reporter(s)/ESR Operator(s)

Filing Fee:

 Notice of Appeal Paid X Not Paid Seaman

 Docket Fee Paid X Not Paid USA/VI

CJA Appointment (Attach Copy of Order)

 Private Attorney

 Defender Association or Federal Public Defender

 Motion Pending

Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis status, if applicable: (Attach copy of the Order)

 X Motion Granted

 Motion Denied

 Motion pending before district judge

Certificate of probable cause (state habeas corpus): (Attach copy of the Order)

 Granted

 Denied

 Pending

 Defendant's Address (for criminal appeals)

 

 Prepared by : 

Mrs. Norman

Deputy Clerk Signature/Date

PLEASE APPEND TO THE NOTICE OF APPEAL AND FORWARD TO

THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

notapp.frm

Case 2:02-cv-04358-AB Document 22 Filed 02/27/2003 Page 1 of 1
**Ex.
      23**








**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**







We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement
      No. 333-128286 on Form S-3 of our report, dated February 16,
      2006, relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedules
      of
      Vectren Utility Holdings, Inc., appearing in this Annual Report on
      Form 10-K of Vectren Utility Holdings, Inc. for the year ended
      December 31, 2005.







Deloitte
      & Touche, LLP.


Indianapolis,
      Indiana




March
      1,
      2006
Case 2:02-cv-20143-HB Document 37 Filed 09/20/2007 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:02-cv-20143-HB Document 37 Filed 09/20/2007 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:02-cv-20143-HB Document 37 Filed 09/20/2007 Page 3 of 3
No. 53489.

protests 139276-K, etc. (New York).

#### Glovetex Corporation et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

The protests were dismissed.
CFOC Audit and Reporting Working 

Group Update

May 2021
2 L EAD ∙ T RANSFORM ∙ D ELIVER

• CFOC Audit and Reporting Working Group 

– Past Projects

• Eliminate Closing Package and Full Financial 

Statement Audit for 40 Significant Entities

– Current Projects 

• Further Leverage Governmentwide Treasury Account 

Symbol Adjusted Trial Balance System (GTAS) Data 

(Focused for 40 Significant Entities)

• Streamlining Financial Reporting and Audit for Small 

Entities (122+ Other Entities)

Background
3 L EAD ∙ T RANSFORM ∙ D ELIVER

Can We Leverage GTAS for Agency Financial Statements? 

Today federal entities produce financial statements from trial balances residing in their core financial systems. Those 

trial balances are also cross-walked into GTAS trial balances used to produce the Financial Report of the U.S. 

Government. The result is a bifurcated reporting process. Could these two reporting streams be merged for a more 

cost-effective, less burdensome, and more consistent approach across the Executive Branch?
4 L EAD ∙ T RANSFORM ∙ D ELIVER

• Standardize Financial Statements and Footnotes

• Obtain appropriate level of detail needed in GTAS 

for agencies (e.g., level and types of financial 

statement and footnote breakouts)

• Obtain Statement on Standards for Attestation 

Engagement (SSAE) No. 18 System and 

Organization Controls (SOC) 1 needed for 

agencies assurance to rely on the GTAS process 

as a reporting tool

• Implement various reports and drill down 

capabilities needed in GTAS to make the agency 

financial statements useful

What Would It Take?
5 L EAD ∙ T RANSFORM ∙ D ELIVER

• Reporting entity for the Financial Report of the U.S. 

Government 165 agencies

– 24 CFO Act Agencies

– 16 Additional Significant Entities

– 125 Small Entities

• Should the financial reporting and audit 

requirements of all 165 be the same?

• In May 2020 a small agency working group was 

established to identify options and recommend 

ways to streamline financial reporting and audit for 

small agencies

Can We Streamline Reporting & Audit for Small Entities?

Over 99% of 

Assets, Liabilities, 

Revenue, Expenses 
6 L EAD ∙ T RANSFORM ∙ D ELIVER

What Are Some Options?

• Recommendation from working group

– Short-term – Exempt small agencies from financial 

reporting requirements that are only needed for Financial 

Report

– Mid-term – Eliminate or streamline MD&A for small 

agencies (FASAB change)

– Long-term – Explore/pilot consolidating small agencies 

financial statements and audits (legislation change)

• Next Steps

– Socialize with all 165 agencies in the Financial Report

– Set up working group to develop a plan for the long-term 

recommendation
| USGS HomeContact USGSSearch USGS |
|----------------------------------|
| Fact Sheet 94–072          |

|                                                                                                                                     |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   About USGS /  Science Topics /  Maps, Products & Publications /  Education / FAQ |
|                                                                                                                                     |

## ENVIRONMENTAL GEOCHEMISTRY OF MERCURY MINES IN ALASKA

The U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), in cooperation with the U.S. Bureau of Mines,  U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, and Calista Corporation (an Alaska native corporation),  is investigating potential environmental contamination around naturally occurring,  mercury-rich mineral deposits in Alaska. Mercury deposits are scattered over  a wide region in southwestern Alaska covering several thousand square kilometers.  Cinnabar (mercury sulfide) is the most common mercury-rich ore mineral in the  deposits, but liquid mercury is found at some localities. Several of the mercury  deposits have been mined, but most of the deposits are small and have not been  developed. None of the mercury mines in Alaska are currently operating due  to economic factors. Mercury is used in the manufacturing of electrical instruments,  fungicides, pharmaceuticals, munitions, paper production, and in the extraction  of gold in mining.
EXHIBIT 32.1



STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF

2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



The undersigned, Dwayne Powell, is the President and Chief Executive Officer of Pocahontas Bancorp, Inc. (the Company).



This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the
Company of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the quarter ended December 31, 2002 (the Report).



By execution of this statement, I certify that:



| | A) |  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and
| | -- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | B) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods covered by the Report.
| | -- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This statement
is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18
U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



|August 14, 2003 |  |  |  | /s/ Dwayne Powell
|--------------- |  |  |  | -----------------
|Dated           |  |  |  | Dwayne Powell
EXHIBIT 32
                                                                      ----------

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Extended Systems Incorporated on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report"), I, Charles W. Jepson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of Extended Systems Incorporated.




/s/ CHARLES W. JEPSON
---------------------------------------
Charles W. Jepson
Chief Executive Officer
May 17, 2004
<PAGE>

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Extended Systems Incorporated on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report"), I, Valerie A. Heusinkveld, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of Extended Systems Incorporated.



/s/ VALERIE A. HEUSINKVELD
---------------------------------------
Valerie A. Heusinkveld
Chief Financial Officer
May 17, 2004
Case 2:02-cv-20144-HB Document 4 Filed 12/09/2003 Page 1 of 24
Case 2:02-cv-20144-HB Document 4 Filed 12/09/2003 Page 2 of 24
Case 2:02-cv-20144-HB Document 4 Filed 12/09/2003 Page 3 of 24
Case 2:02-cv-20144-HB Document 4 Filed 12/09/2003 Page 4 of 24
Case 2:02-cv-20144-HB Document 4 Filed 12/09/2003 Page 5 of 24
Case 2:02-cv-20144-HB Document 4 Filed 12/09/2003 Page 6 of 24
Case 2:02-cv-20144-HB Document 4 Filed 12/09/2003 Page 7 of 24
Case 2:02-cv-20144-HB Document 4 Filed 12/09/2003 Page 8 of 24
Case 2:02-cv-20144-HB Document 4 Filed 12/09/2003 Page 9 of 24
Case 2:02-cv-20144-HB Document 4 Filed 12/09/2003 Page 10 of 24
Case 2:02-cv-20144-HB Document 4 Filed 12/09/2003 Page 11 of 24
Case 2:02-cv-20144-HB Document 4 Filed 12/09/2003 Page 12 of 24
Case 2:02-cv-20144-HB Document 4 Filed 12/09/2003 Page 13 of 24
Case 2:02-cv-20144-HB Document 4 Filed 12/09/2003 Page 14 of 24
Case 2:02-cv-20144-HB Document 4 Filed 12/09/2003 Page 15 of 24
Case 2:02-cv-20144-HB Document 4 Filed 12/09/2003 Page 16 of 24
Case 2:02-cv-20144-HB Document 4 Filed 12/09/2003 Page 17 of 24
Case 2:02-cv-20144-HB Document 4 Filed 12/09/2003 Page 18 of 24
Case 2:02-cv-20144-HB Document 4 Filed 12/09/2003 Page 19 of 24
Case 2:02-cv-20144-HB Document 4 Filed 12/09/2003 Page 20 of 24
Case 2:02-cv-20144-HB Document 4 Filed 12/09/2003 Page 21 of 24
Case 2:02-cv-20144-HB Document 4 Filed 12/09/2003 Page 22 of 24
Case 2:02-cv-20144-HB Document 4 Filed 12/09/2003 Page 23 of 24
Case 2:02-cv-20144-HB Document 4 Filed 12/09/2003 Page 24 of 24
AVS

Quality Management

System

Title: Domestic New Action Worksheet with S8

QPM#

AIR-ANM..Q3G-F7

Date: December 17, 2008

Revision

1

Record of Contacts

.7011-0033

FOMSDocketNo.FAA-~ __ - _

With whom outside the FAA ha5lhis proposal been dis<:ussOO(e.g .. ATA. RAA, ALPA, etc.)?

Orgauil.lltiOD Person Contacted Dalf

.-\T.-\. GrcJ!.lbrd~·-C:lbin 11-"I~i\Rj[)Ek ::'l12H120U9

,\TA Ngu~'cn, Relic T - Cabin IFE .-\RIIlEI{ ;:;/18/200'1

I

Organization I Person Contacted I 01111'

UNCONTROLLED COpy WHEN DOWNLOADED

Check Ihe Masl~r List 10Verify That This is lI,e Corrl!cl Revision Sefore Use
Jul 29 2010 

Mr. James G. Stephenson 

President 

Aero Sports Connection 

231 SW Bonanza Glen 

Lake City, FL 32025 

Dear Mr. Stephenson: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from 

Order 8130.2F. It explains why we cannot process your request, gives you some important 

information about how we have handled similar requests, and tells you what you should do in 

the next 30 days. 

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We entered your June 8, 2010, exemption request for Aero Sports Connection (ASC) into the 

public Docket No. FAA-2010-0635, but we are unable to process your request any further. 

The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of Title 14, Code of Federal 

Regulations (14 CFR) § 11.81. For us to consider the request any further, you must send us 

all of the following: 

1. The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of 

the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief; 

2. The reasons granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole; 

3. The reasons the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which 

you seek an exemption (e.g. ASC’s proposed manufacturing and/or maintenance 

standards, and the specifics of ASC’s proposal regarding the pilot qualifications, jump 

guidelines, and etc.); and 

4. Any more information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 
2 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without further 

consideration. 

If you have any questions or need more time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

John W. McGraw 

Acting Director, Flight Standards 

 Service
<PAGE>

                                                                      Exhibit 24

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

                         INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY
              Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended
                               December 31, 2002


     The  undersigned  directors of INDIANA  MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY,  an Indiana
corporation  (the "Company"),  do hereby  constitute and appoint E. LINN DRAPER,
JR.,   ARMANDO   A.  PENA  and   SUSAN   TOMASKY,   and  each  of  them,   their
attorneys-in-fact  and agents,  to execute for them, and in their names,  and in
any and all of their capacities,  the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K,
pursuant to Section 13 of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,  for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2002, and any and all  amendments  thereto,  and to file
the same, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith,
with   the   Securities   and   Exchange   Commission,    granting   unto   said
attorneys-in-fact  and agents,  and each of them, full power and authority to do
and perform  every act and thing  required or necessary to be done,  as fully to
all intents and purposes as the undersigned might or could do in person,  hereby
ratifying and confirming all that said  attorneys-in-fact  and agents, or any of
them, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

     IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the undersigned  have signed these presents this 26th
day of February, 2003.


   /s/ Karl G. Boyd                                /s/ Susanne M. Moorman
--------------------------------                --------------------------------
Karl G. Boyd                                    Susanne M. Moorman


   /s/ E. Linn Draper, Jr.                         /s/ Robert P. Powers
--------------------------------                --------------------------------
E. Linn Draper, Jr.                             Robert P. Powers


   /s/ John E. Ehler                               /s/ John R. Sampson
--------------------------------                 -------------------------------
John E. Ehler                                   John R. Sampson


   /s/ Henry W. Fayne                              /s/ Thomas V. Shockley, III
--------------------------------                --------------------------------
Henry W. Fayne                                  Thomas V. Shockley, III


   /s/ Thomas M. Hagan                             /s/ D. B. Synowiec
--------------------------------                --------------------------------
Thomas M. Hagan                                 D. B. Synowiec


   /s/ David L. Lahrman                            /s/ Susan Tomasky
--------------------------------                --------------------------------
David L. Lahrman                                Susan Tomasky


   /s/ Marc E. Lewis
---------------------------
Marc E. Lewis
Wace:

IPAC Operational Metrics for May 2016

Volume by Transaction Type
Dollar Amount] Sof Total Dollar Amount] Number of Transactions] __% of Total Number of Transactions|

[Fiduciary (investment & Borrowing) 16,095,686,454,953 99.6456] 10,249] 9.37%]

fBuy/Sen 53,315 892,862 0.33% 97,503] 39.18%

Benefits (RITS) 4.375,032,774| 0.03% 403} 037%

[Check Aftermath (TRACS) 26,886,938 10.00% 7174] 1.07%

[Zero Dollar | (0.00% |

[Grand Total - May 2016 16,154,064,247,527, 100.00%| 103,335]

[Grand Total - April 2016 16,151,408,798,774| +100.0056|

[April to May Change 2,655,448, 754

Percentage Change 0.016%

[Grand Total - May 2015 7A86,671,953,698)

[May 2015 to May 2016 Change 8,667,392,293,829)

[Percentage Change

115.8% |
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit

No. 96-60505 Summary Calendar

JOHNNY BURSE, Sgt.,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

ALICE SCOTT, in her official capacity as Mayor of the City of Canton, Mississippi, and in her individual capacity; JIMMY WILSON, in his official capacity as Chief of Police of the City of Canton, Mississippi, and in his individual capacity; CITY OF CANTON, MISSISSIPPI,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Southern District of Mississippi

(3:95-CV-678BN)

December 31, 1996

Before JONES, DeMOSS, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Burse filed suit against Scott, the Mayor of the City of

Canton, Mississippi, and against Wilson, the Chief of Police of the2

City of Canton, Mississippi, both in their individual and official

capacities, and against the City of Canto n, Mississippi, itself,

alleging that he was suspended and ultimately demoted from his job

as Narcotics Investigator for the City of Canton/Madison County

Sheriff’s Department’s Joint Drug Task Force as a result of

retaliation for his support of the incumbent mayor of Canton in an

election won by his challenger. Burse also alleged that he was

denied due process by the actions of the defendants and that the

defendants had made defamatory statements about him. The

defendants moved for summary judgment which the lower court

granted.

We have carefully reviewed the brie fs, the reply brief, the

record excerpts and relevant portions of the summary judgment

record itself. For the reasons stated by the district court in its

Opinion and Order filed under date of June 24, 1996, we are

satisfied that the Final Judgment filed under date of June 24 is

correct and should be affirmed.

AFFIRMED

.
No. 53983.

#### Schenley Import Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 147342-K (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the coutt dismissed the protest.