alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Kenneth A. Shewer, Co-Chief Executive Officer of the Managing Owner, Preferred Investment Solutions Corp. (the Managing Owner), of World
Monitor Trust  Series B (Series B), hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | Series Bs Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Quarterly Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Series B.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                          
|--------------------------
|/s/ Kenneth A. Shewer     
|Kenneth A. Shewer         
|Co-Chief Executive Officer
|November 14, 2005
EXHIBIT 23.1

            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

      We  consent  to  the   incorporation  by  reference  in  the  Registration
Statements on Form S-8  (Registration  No. 333-87973) and Form S-3 (Registration
No.  333-82128)  of our  report  dated  February  11,  2005 on our  audit of the
financial  statements  included in the 2004 annual report on Form 10-KSB of I.D.
Systems, Inc.

      We also consent to the  reference to our firm under the caption  "Experts"
in the Form S-3.


/s/ Eisner LLP


New York, New York
March 28, 2005
The Mountain That Moved

This General-Interest Publication brochure has been made available in Portable Document Format. You may reproduce it on 8.5"x14" (legal) paper by setting your printer to landscape, printing on two sides, and folding the final copy into quarters.

Prehistoric, giant landslides in Montgomery and Craig Counties, Va., in the Blacksburg/Wythe Ranger Districts of the Jefferson National Forest, are the largest known landslides in eastern North America and are among the largest in the world.  One of the landslides is more than 3 miles long! The ancient, giant landslides extend for more than 20 miles along the eastern slope of Sinking Creek Mountain.   Enormous slabs of rock ranging from about 0.2 to more than 1.5 square miles in size broke loose and slid downslope under the influence of gravity.  The movement of some slides may have been slow, but the movement of others was probably sudden and catastrophic.

---

This report is stored in Portable Document Format.Adobe Acrobat Reader is required to view it.If you already have Acrobat Reader 3.0 (or later) installedon your computer, click here to  download the complete report (118 K).

If you wish to download Acrobat Readerfree of charge, click here.





---

VIEW a list of other USGS General InterestPublications

U.S. Department of the InteriorU.S. Geological SurveyThis page is <URL: https://pubs.usgs.gov/gip/mountain/>Maintained by: Publications ServicesLast modified 3 May 2000For more information about this report contact Sandra Clark at shbclark@usgs.gov
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

 

 

FELIX D. WHITTINGTON,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

DONALD VAUGHN, et al.,

 Defendants.

 CIVIL ACTION

 NO. 02-4346

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of September, 2002, it is hereby ORDERED that

the attached communication dated August 13, 2002, shall be filed by the Clerk.

BY THE COURT:

 

_______________________________________

MARVIN KATZ, S.J.

Case 2:02-cv-04346-MK Document 9 Filed 09/03/2002 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, Maureen D. Howley,
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the managing owner as of October 1, 2004, Preferred Investment Solutions Corp., of World Monitor TrustSeries B (Series B), hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | Series Bs Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 24, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Quarterly
Report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Series B.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                                                                                                                   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Maureen D. Howley                                                                                                                                              
|Maureen D. Howley Senior Vice President andChief Financial Officer ofPreferred Investment Solutions Corp.,the managing owner as of October 1,
2004 November 8, 2004
Case 2:02-cv-20135-HB Document 18-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 1 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20135-HB Document 18-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 2 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20135-HB Document 18-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 3 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20135-HB Document 18-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 4 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20135-HB Document 18-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 5 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20135-HB Document 18-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 6 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20135-HB Document 18-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 7 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20135-HB Document 18-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 8 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20135-HB Document 18-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 9 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20135-HB Document 18-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 10 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20135-HB Document 18-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 11 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20135-HB Document 18-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 12 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20135-HB Document 18-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 13 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20135-HB Document 18-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 14 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20135-HB Document 18-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 15 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20135-HB Document 18-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 16 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20135-HB Document 18-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 17 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20135-HB Document 18-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 18 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20135-HB Document 18-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 19 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20135-HB Document 18-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 20 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20135-HB Document 18-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 21 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20135-HB Document 18-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 22 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20135-HB Document 18-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 23 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20135-HB Document 18-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 24 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20135-HB Document 18-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 25 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20135-HB Document 18-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 26 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20135-HB Document 18-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 27 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20135-HB Document 18-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 28 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-20135-HB Document 18-2 Filed 04/08/2005 Page 29 of 29
June 3, 1963

No. 67804.

Appeal 5088.

#### United States (Index Industrial Corp., Party in Interest) *v.*National Starch Products, Inc.

C.D. 2256 reversed (on rehearing) December 12, 1962. C.A.D. 809.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

RONALD E. and LESLIE A. :

CHAMBERS, as GUARDIANS of : CIVIL ACTION

FERREN CHAMBERS an incapacitated :

person and RONALD E. and LESLIE : 

A. CHAMBERS, in their own right : 

 :

Plaintiffs, :

v. :

 :

THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF : No. 05-2535

PHILADELPHIA BOARD OF :

EDUCATION, :

Defendant. : 

 O R D E R

AND NOW, this 24 day of October, 2011, upon consideration of the Motion for Partial th

Summary Judgment filed by the Chambers Plaintiffs (Docket No. 94), the Motion in Limine filed

by the Chambers Plaintiffs to permit the testimony of Hearing Officer Rosemary Mullaly at trial

or, in the alternative, to admit her written administrative decision into evidence (Docket No. 95),

and the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by the Defendant School District of Philadelphia

Board of Education (Docket No. 100), and all responses thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Motion for Partial Summary Judgment filed by the Chambers Plaintiffs

(Docket No. 94) is DENIED. 

2. The Motion in Limine filed by the Chambers Plaintiffs (Docket No. 95) is

DENIED.

1

Case 2:05-cv-02535-GP Document 132 Filed 10/24/11 Page 1 of 2
3. The Motion for Summary Judgment filed by the Defendant School District

(Docket No. 100) is GRANTED without prejudice to the Chambers Plaintiffs’

rights to apply for leave to re-open and supplement these summary judgment

papers to the extent they erred in their understanding as to the “record” on which

they could or should base their summary judgment motion and/or as to their

obligations to raise such issues.

4. The Clerk of Court shall enter Judgment in favor of the Defendant School District

of Philadelphia Board of Education, and against the Chambers Plaintiffs.

 

BY THE COURT:

 

S/Gene E.K. Pratter

GENE E.K. PRATTER

United States District Judge

2

Case 2:05-cv-02535-GP Document 132 Filed 10/24/11 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

TUNG MA : CIVIL ACTION

:

 v. :

:

KENNETH D. KYLER, et al. : NO. 02-4380

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of January, 2003, upon consideration of the

respondent’s motion for enlargement of time to file response (Document No. 11), it is

hereby ORDERED that:

1. The motion is GRANTED;

2. The answer to the habeas petition shall be filed on or before January 30,

2003.

BY THE COURT:

 

DIANE M. WELSH

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:02-cv-04380-PBT Document 12 Filed 01/08/2003 Page 1 of 1
|   | § | This      Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,and |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | § | The      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial position and results of operations of Western      Reserve Bancorp, Inc. as of and for the periods  presented. |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |  /s/ Edward J. McKeon                 |   |
|--------|--------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Edward      J. McKeon                      |   |
|   | President      and Chief Executive Officer |   |
|   | August      13, 2010                       |   |

----
No. 59482.

protests 220216-K, etc. (New York).

#### Arkwright Accessories, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silk scarves or squares similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *The Specialty House, Inc., Bryant & Heffernan, Inc., et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 136, C. A. D. 585), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 11

- 00393

- CV

NASSER REZAEE APPELLANT

V.

DAVID LITTMAN, A.T.L ., INC.,

JUL IE LOWRY, RENEE STACK,

AND THOMAS STACK APPELLEES

------------

FROM THE 96TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUN TY

------------



### MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 

### AND JUDGMENT

------------

We have considered appellant ’ s “ Motion To Dismiss Appeal .” It is the

court = s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2( f).

Costs of the appeal shall be paid by appellant, for which let execution

issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(d).

PER CURIAM

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.2

PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J.

DELIVERED: December 15, 2011
Before the Third Division,

September 26, 1946

No. 51324.

#### Protest 124048-K of H. Schoenfeld (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of mushroom flour or powder the same in all material respects as that the subject of *Martel Food Corp.*v. *United States*(15 Cust. Ct. 109, C. D. 954). In accordance therewith the claim at 35 percent under paragraph 775 was sustained.
Filed by Bowne Pure Compliance





Exhibit 10.61




ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION

OF EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT




THIS ASSIGNMENT AND ASSUMPTION OF EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (this “Assignment”), effective the 20th
day of June 2008, is made by and between MiMedx Group, Inc. (formerly Alynx, Co.), a Florida
corporation (“Assignor”), and MiMedx, Inc., a Florida corporation (“Assignee”).



WHEREAS, Assignor, as the “Company” under that certain employment agreement by and between
Assignor and Brian J. Splan (as “Executive”), entered into that certain employment agreement dated
February 20, 2008 (the “Employment Agreement); and



WHEREAS, due to certain recent corporate transactions, including Assignor’s merger with
Assignee, a private operating company, the parties believe it is in their best interests to assign
the Employment Agreement to Assignee, so that Executive will become employed by Assignee for
purposes of completing the terms of the Employment Agreement.



NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are
hereby acknowledged, Assignor and Assignee agree as follows:



1. Assignment. Assignor hereby assigns and delivers all of its rights, duties and
obligations under the Employment Agreement to Assignee effective on the date and year first written
above.



2. Assumption of Duties. Assignee hereby assumes and agrees to pay, discharge, or
perform, as appropriate, all of Assignor’s obligations under the Employment Agreement arising after
the date hereof. If any of those obligations was discovered after the date hereof, but were, in
actuality, incurred prior to the date hereof, those obligations shall be paid, discharged or
performed, as appropriate, by Assignor.



[SIGNATURES ON FOLLOWING PAGE]




 


 









 







IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Assignment as of the date and year written
below.



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	ASSIGNOR:



MIMEDX GROUP, INC. (formerly Alynx, Co.)

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/  John C. Thomas, Jr.
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	John C. Thomas, Jr. 	 
	 	 	Title:  	Secretary 	 
	 



	 	 	 	 	 
	 	ASSIGNEE:



MIMEDX, INC.

 	 
	 	By:  	/s/  John C. Thomas, Jr.
 	 
	 	 	Name:  	John C. Thomas, Jr. 	 
	 	 	Title:  	Secretary 	 
	 




BRIAN J. SPLAN (“Executive” under the Employment Agreement) joins herein to indicate his consent to
the assignment and assumption of the Employment Agreement, agrees to look solely to Assignee for
performance of all obligations of Assignor arising under the Employment Agreement after the date of
this Assignment, agrees that the Employment Agreement remains in full force and effect, and agrees
to continue to be fully bound by its terms.



	 	 	 	 	 
	/s/ Brian J. Splan	 	 
	 	 	 
	BRIAN J. SPLAN	 	 
	 
	 	 	 	 
	Date:

	 	6/20/2008
Form W-7A

(Rev. October 2017)

Department of the Treasury 

Internal Revenue Service 

Application for Taxpayer Identification Number 

for Pending U.S. Adoptions

▶ Go to www.irs.gov/FormW7A for instructions and the latest information.

OMB No. 1545-0074

Note: Don't file this form if you are eligible to obtain a U.S. social security number (SSN) for your adoptive child. 

1 Adoptive 

parent(s) 

information 

(see instructions) 

1a Parent’s last name First name Social security number 

1b Parent’s last name First name Social security number 

2 Adoptive 

parent(s) 

address 

(see instructions) 

Street address, apartment number, or rural route number. If you have a P.O. box, see the instructions. 

City or town, state, and ZIP code 

3 Child’s name: 

 As it will appear 

 ▶ on your tax return

Birth name if different 

and known . . ▶

3a Last name First name Middle name 

3b Last name First name Middle name 

4 Child’s birth 

information 

Date of birth (month, day, year) Female 

Male 

Place of birth (city or town, and state) (If foreign address, see instructions) 

5 Placement 

agency 

information 

Name Address Date child 

was placed 

with adoptive 

parents 

Sign 

Here 

Note: Be sure to attach the required documentation to Form W-7A. See instructions. 

Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have examined this application, including accompanying documentation and statements, and to 

the best of my knowledge and belief, it is true, correct, and complete. 

Signature of parent 

Keep a copy of this 

form for your 

records.

▲

Date (month, day, year) Daytime phone number 

▲

Signature of parent Date (month, day, year) Daytime phone number 

For Privacy Act and Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, see the separate instructions. Cat. No. 24309E Form W-7A (Rev. 10-2017)
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 95-2746

WILLIE WALLACE,

Petitioner,

versus

CLINCHFIELD COAL COMPANY; DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF

WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES

DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,

Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Benefits Review Board.

(95-779-BLA)

Submitted: September 30, 1996 Decided: October 9, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN, HAMILTON, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Willie Wallace, Petitioner Pro Se. Michael Francis Blair, PENN,

STUART, ESKRIDGE & JONES, Abingdon, Virginia; Jeffrey Steven

Goldberg, Christian P. Barber, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,

Washington, D.C., for Respondents.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks review of the Benefits Review Board's decision

and order affirming the administrative law judge's denial of black

lung benefits pursuant to 30 U.S.C.A. §§ 901-945 (West 1986 & Supp.

1996). Our review of the record discloses that the Board's decision

is based upon substantial evidence and is without reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the Board. Wallace v.

Clinchfield Coal Co., No. 95-779-BLA (B.R.B. Aug. 25, 1995). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
Case 2:05-md-01675-TJS Document 32 Filed 12/17/2008 Page 1 of 28
Case 2:05-md-01675-TJS Document 32 Filed 12/17/2008 Page 2 of 28
Case 2:05-md-01675-TJS Document 32 Filed 12/17/2008 Page 3 of 28
Case 2:05-md-01675-TJS Document 32 Filed 12/17/2008 Page 4 of 28
Case 2:05-md-01675-TJS Document 32 Filed 12/17/2008 Page 5 of 28
Case 2:05-md-01675-TJS Document 32 Filed 12/17/2008 Page 6 of 28
Case 2:05-md-01675-TJS Document 32 Filed 12/17/2008 Page 7 of 28
Case 2:05-md-01675-TJS Document 32 Filed 12/17/2008 Page 8 of 28
Case 2:05-md-01675-TJS Document 32 Filed 12/17/2008 Page 9 of 28
Case 2:05-md-01675-TJS Document 32 Filed 12/17/2008 Page 10 of 28
Case 2:05-md-01675-TJS Document 32 Filed 12/17/2008 Page 11 of 28
Case 2:05-md-01675-TJS Document 32 Filed 12/17/2008 Page 12 of 28
Case 2:05-md-01675-TJS Document 32 Filed 12/17/2008 Page 13 of 28
Case 2:05-md-01675-TJS Document 32 Filed 12/17/2008 Page 14 of 28
Case 2:05-md-01675-TJS Document 32 Filed 12/17/2008 Page 15 of 28
Case 2:05-md-01675-TJS Document 32 Filed 12/17/2008 Page 16 of 28
Case 2:05-md-01675-TJS Document 32 Filed 12/17/2008 Page 17 of 28
Case 2:05-md-01675-TJS Document 32 Filed 12/17/2008 Page 18 of 28
Case 2:05-md-01675-TJS Document 32 Filed 12/17/2008 Page 19 of 28
Case 2:05-md-01675-TJS Document 32 Filed 12/17/2008 Page 20 of 28
Case 2:05-md-01675-TJS Document 32 Filed 12/17/2008 Page 21 of 28
Case 2:05-md-01675-TJS Document 32 Filed 12/17/2008 Page 22 of 28
Case 2:05-md-01675-TJS Document 32 Filed 12/17/2008 Page 23 of 28
Case 2:05-md-01675-TJS Document 32 Filed 12/17/2008 Page 24 of 28
Case 2:05-md-01675-TJS Document 32 Filed 12/17/2008 Page 25 of 28
Case 2:05-md-01675-TJS Document 32 Filed 12/17/2008 Page 26 of 28
Case 2:05-md-01675-TJS Document 32 Filed 12/17/2008 Page 27 of 28
Case 2:05-md-01675-TJS Document 32 Filed 12/17/2008 Page 28 of 28
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ROBERT S. CHEATLE, JR., et al. : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. :

:

DAVID A. KATZ, et al. : NO. 02-4405

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 19th day of December, 2003, pursuant to the terms of the parties

November 21, 2003 settlement, the Court issues the following ORDER:

1. The Court hereby appoints, as its Neutral Appraiser:

Mr. Barry S. Ludwig, M.A.I., C.R.C.

Ludwig Corporation

925 Fayette St.

Conshohocken, PA 19428

2. On or before January 15, 2004, the Neutral Appraiser shall submit his report on

the value of Plaintiffs’ home to the Court, together with his bill for services.

3. Upon receipt of said report and bill, the Court shall provide copies to each of

the parties. Each party shall pay 1⁄2 of the Neutral Appraiser’s fee directly to the Appraiser.

4. The report of the Neutral Appraiser shall be final and binding on the parties,

and shall establish the price at which Defendant has agreed to purchase Plaintiffs’ home.

5. On or before February 15, 2004, the parties shall submit a fully signed

Settlement Agreement to the Court, pursuant to which this action shall be dismissed.

 

 JACOB P. HART, M.J.

 

 Copies faxed to: Copies mailed to:

 John C. Fenningham, Esq.; Francis Recchuiti, Esq.

Case 2:02-cv-04405-HH Document 20 Filed 12/19/2003 Page 1 of 1
# Proposed Crosswalk

&"-,Bold"&14USSGL DRAFT Guidance	

# List of all USSGLs
No. 59473.

protests 227146-K, etc. (Providence).

#### E. H. Ashley & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that the subject of Abstract 59105, the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (1) The items marked with the letter “A” at 10 'percent under the provision in paragraph 1528, as modified by T. D. 51802 and T. D. 51898, for imitation.semiprecious stones, faceted, and (2) the items marked with the letter “B” at 30 percent under said paragraph, as modified, *supra,*as imitation semiprecious stones, not faceted.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

DOLORES BARRETT : CIVIL ACTION 

 vs. : NO: 02-4421

THE GREATER HATBORO

CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, INC. ET AL. :

NOTICE 

Please be advised that the above-captioned matter is listed for oral argument on Plaintiff’s

Motion for Sanctions for Failure to Comply with Discovery Order with the Honorable Petrese B.

Tucker on Thursday, July 1, at 9:00 a. m. Counsel shall report to Courtroom 9B, 601 Market

Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

FOR THE COURT:

 

Alisa Ross

DeputyClerktoJudge PetreseB.Tucker

(267) 299-7619

cc: A. Alberts

S. Gold

Date issued: June 18, 2004

Case 2:02-cv-04421-PBT Document 19 Filed 06/22/2004 Page 1 of 1