alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

CANDACE RAY, : CIVIL ACTION

Plaintiff, :

:

v. : NO. 02-4382

:

ABINGTON TOWNSHIP, et al., :

Defendants. :

ORDER

Counsel for plaintiff has filed a motion to withdraw, which plaintiff herself

opposes. There is presently before the court two fully-briefed summary judgment motions. 

Withdrawal at this time would not be appropriate pending disposition of those motions.

AND NOW, this 2nd day of December, 2003, it is hereby ORDERED that

plaintiff’s counsel’s motion to withdraw (Docket No. 23) is DENIED, without prejudice.

BY THE COURT:

 

 RONALD L. BUCKWALTER, J.

Case 2:02-cv-04382-RB Document 29 Filed 12/02/2003 Page 1 of 1
Before the First Division,

June 29, 1944

No. 49580.

#### Protest 18120-K of Rohner, Gehrig & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It was stipulated that the glass candlesticks in question are similar to those the subject of *Marks & Rosenfeld, Inc.*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 66, C. D. 795). The claim under paragraph 218 (c) was therefore sustained.
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C.


SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of IRSA
Propiedades Comerciales S.A. (the “Company”) for
the fiscal year ended June 30, 2018 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), Alejandro G. Elsztain, as Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;





(1)
The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15
(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.





IRSA Propiedades Comerciales S.A.October
22, 2018.
By:
/s/ Alejandro
G. ElsztainAlejandro
G. ElsztainChief
Executive Officer





This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except as to the
extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed
by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

**CertificationPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofAXT, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2005,as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Wilson W. Cheung, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), that, to the best of myknowledge:

 

(1)          The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities andExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

 

(2)          The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: May 6, 2005 |   | By:    | /s/ Wilson W. Cheung    |
|--------------------|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|               |   |   | Wilson W. Cheung        |
|               |   |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
Case 2:05-cv-01490-JP Document 1 Filed 03/31/05 Page 1 of 9
Case 2:05-cv-01490-JP Document 1 Filed 03/31/05 Page 2 of 9
Case 2:05-cv-01490-JP Document 1 Filed 03/31/05 Page 3 of 9
Case 2:05-cv-01490-JP Document 1 Filed 03/31/05 Page 4 of 9
Case 2:05-cv-01490-JP Document 1 Filed 03/31/05 Page 5 of 9
Case 2:05-cv-01490-JP Document 1 Filed 03/31/05 Page 6 of 9
Case 2:05-cv-01490-JP Document 1 Filed 03/31/05 Page 7 of 9
Case 2:05-cv-01490-JP Document 1 Filed 03/31/05 Page 8 of 9
Case 2:05-cv-01490-JP Document 1 Filed 03/31/05 Page 9 of 9
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**Certification Pursuant to Section 302 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Wilson W. Cheung, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of AXT, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report doesnot contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a materialfact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances underwhich such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this report, fairlypresent in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport;

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officerand I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls andprocedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for theregistrant and have:

 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls andprocedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designedunder our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of theregistrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this reportour conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and

 

(c) Disclosed in this report any change inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred duringthe registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officerand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof the registrant’s board of directors:

 

(a) All significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financialreporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, thatinvolves management or other employees who have a significant role in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Dated: May 12, 2006 | By:    | /s/ Wilson W. Cheung    |
|---------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                |   | Wilson W. Cheung        |
|                |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MARGARET ANCTIL :

: CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-CV-4285

Plaintiff, :

:

v. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION;

BAYER AG;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE;

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM

:

:

:

:

:

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

:

Defendants. :

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of the Court:

Kindly enter the appearances of Hope S. Freiwald, Aline Fairweather, Erin

Brennan and Kirstin J. Miller as attorneys for defendant SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a

GlaxoSmithKline.

Respectfully Submitted,

_____________________________ _____________________________

Hope S. Freiwald Aline Fairweather

_____________________________ _____________________________

Erin Brennan Kirstin J. Miller

DECHERT PRICE & RHOADS

4000 Bell Atlantic Tower

1717 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2793

(215) 994-4000

Case 2:02-cv-04285-LDD Document 7 Filed 09/16/2002 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 222 (Monday, November 20, 2023)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 80584]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-25510]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Internal Revenue Service

26 CFR Parts 1 and 53

[TD 9981]
RIN 1545-BJ23


Requirements for Type I and Type III Supporting Organizations; 
Correction

AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Treasury.

ACTION: Final regulations; correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This document contains a correction to Treasury Decision 9981, 
which was published in the Federal Register for Monday, October 16, 
2023. Treasury Decision 9981 issued final regulations providing 
guidance on the prohibition on certain gifts or contributions to Type I 
and Type III supporting organizations from persons who control a 
supported organization and on certain other requirements for Type III 
supporting organizations. The regulations reflect changes to the law 
made by the Pension Protection Act of 2006.

DATES: This correction is effective on November 20, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Gruccio at (202) 317-4541 (not 
a toll-free number), or Don Spellman at (202) 317-4086 (not a toll-free 
number).

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background

    The final regulations (TD 9981) that are the subject of this 
correction are under section 509(a) of the Code.

Corrections to Publication

    Accordingly, the final regulations (TD 9981) that are the subject 
of FR Doc. 2023-22286, published on October 16, 2023, are corrected on 
page 71298, in the first column, the sixth through eighth lines under 
the heading ``Statement of Availability of IRS Documents'' are 
corrected to read ``visiting the IRS website at: https://www.irs.gov/
irb/2014-02_IRB#NOT-2014-4''.

Oluwafunmilayo A. Taylor,
Section Chief, Publications & Regulations Branch, Associate Chief 
Counsel (Procedure and Administration).
[FR Doc. 2023-25510 Filed 11-17-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4830-01-P
Before the Second Division,

June 10, 1963

No. 67806.

#### General Sportcraft Co., Ltd. *v.*United States,

protest 274511-K(A) (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of perlón tennis strings similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 61832, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Integrated
Healthcare Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30,
2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company at the dates and for the period indicated

      This Certificate has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.


                                        INTEGRATED HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS, INC.

Dated: November 13, 2007                By: /s/ Bruce Mogel
                                            ---------------
                                            Bruce Mogel
                                            Chief Executive Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

KATHY IRIZARRY, :

Plaintiff :

:

v. : CIVIL ACTION

: NO. 02-4412

HENRY MEARIG, INC., :

Defendant :

:

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 10th day of January, 2003, the Court hereby MODIFIES its September

19, 2002 Scheduling Order [doc. no. 5]. It is hereby ORDERED that the case shall be referred to

Magistrate Judge Carol Sandra Moore Wells for a settlement conference. Counsel for the parties

are directed to report to Judge Wells’s chambers (Room 3016) on January 21, 2003, at 10:00

a.m. The parties and/or persons with full authority to settle must accompany counsel

unless excused in advance by Judge Wells. All other terms of the Scheduling Order not

inconsistent with this Order shall remain in full force and effect.

Absent a persuasive showing of necessity or exigent circumstances, the Court will not

grant any extensions of time to conduct discovery, whether by stipulation or otherwise.

It is so ORDERED.

BY THE COURT:

______________________________

CYNTHIA M. RUFE, J.

Case 2:02-cv-04412-CMR Document 6 Filed 01/13/2003 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>


      CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I,  J.  STEPHEN  BARLEY, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant  to  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report  on Form 10-KSB of Tuscany Minerals, Ltd. for the year ended December 31,
2002  fully  complies  with  the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Annual
Report  on  Form  10-KSB  fairly presents in all material respects the financial
condition  and  results  of  operations  of  Tuscany  Minerals,  Ltd.



                                     By:       /s/ J. Stephen Barley
                                               ---------------------------------

                                     Name:     J. Stephen Barley

                                     Title:    Chief Executive Officer and
                                               Chief Financial Officer

                                     Date:     March 5, 2003
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit 

__________________________ 

ROBERT BOSCH LLC, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v. 

PYLON MANUFACTURING CORP., 

Defendant-Cross-Appellant. 

__________________________ 

2011-1363, -1364 

__________________________ 

Appeals from the United States District Court for the 

District of Delaware in case no. 08-CV-0542, Judge Sue L. 

Robinson. 

__________________________ 

Before RADER, Chief Judge, NEWMAN, LOURIE, BRYSON, 

LINN, DYK, PROST, MOORE, O’MALLEY, REYNA, and 

WALLACH, Circuit Judges. 

PER CURIAM. 

O R D E R 

This case was argued before a panel of this court on 

July 9, 2012. Thereafter, a poll of the judges in regular 

active service was conducted to determine whether the 

jurisdictional issues raised by this appeal should be heard 

en banc. 

Upon consideration thereof, 
ROBERT BOSCH v. PYLON MFG CORP 2

IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

(1) The court by its own action grants a hearing en 

banc. 

(2) The parties are requested to file new en banc 

briefs limited to the following questions: 

 a) Does 28 U.S.C. § 1292(c)(2) confer jurisdiction on 

this Court to entertain appeals from patent infringement 

liability determinations when a trial on damages has not 

yet occurred? 

 b) Does 28 U.S.C. § 1292(c)(2) confer jurisdiction on 

this Court to entertain appeals from patent infringement 

liability determinations when willfulness issues are 

outstanding and remain undecided? 

(3) An original and thirty copies of the new en banc 

briefs shall be filed, and two copies of each en banc brief 

shall be served on opposing counsel. Plaintiff-Appellant’s 

en banc brief is due 40 days from the date of this order. 

Defendant-Cross-Appellant’s en banc response brief is due 

within 40 days of service of Plaintiff-Appellant’s new en 

banc brief, and Plaintiff-Appellant’s reply brief is due 

within 14 days of service of Defendant-Cross-Appellant’s 

response brief. Principal briefs shall not exceed 7,000 

words, and the reply brief shall not exceed 3,500 words. 

(4) Briefs of amici curiae will be entertained. Any 

such amici briefs may be filed without consent and leave 

of court, and shall not exceed 7,000 words, but otherwise 

must comply with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 29 

and Federal Circuit Rule 29. Any such briefs shall be 

limited to the questions above. 

(5) Oral argument will be scheduled at a later date. 
3 ROBERT BOSCH v. PYLON MFG CORP

FOR THE COURT

August 7, 2012 

—————————— 

Date 

/s/ Jan Horbaly 

—————————— 

Jan Horbaly 

Clerk 

cc: Mark A. Hannemann, Esq. 

Mark A. Pals, Esq.
|Exhibit 99.2


Certification of Chief Financial Officer of


Agere Systems Inc.


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
(Adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)


The
undersigned Chief Financial Officer of Agere Systems Inc. (Agere) hereby
certifies that:
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | 1. |  | Ageres
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended September 30, 2002, to which this
certification is attached as an exhibit (the Report), fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| |  | -- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| |  | 2. |  | The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of Agere.
| |  | -- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|/s/ MARK T. GREENQUIST

Mark T. Greenquist
Chief Financial Officer
        December 12, 2002
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Before the Third Division,

June 24, 1944

No. 49558.

#### Protests 980002-G, etc., of A. Hartog & Co., Inc., et al. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that the cheese in question is similar to that the subject of Abstracts 42146, 42309, and 42178. The protests were therefore sustained to this extent.
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-11-00221-CV

In re Jon Alan Ashcraft

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

__________________________________________

Melissa Goodwin, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Henson and Goodwin

Filed: May 3, 2011
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 12, 2022

No. 04-22-00223-CV

REVERSE MORTGAGE SOLUTIONS, INC.,

Appellant

v.

ALLSTATE VEHICLE AND PROPERTY INSURANCE COMPANY,

Appellees

From the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2020-CI-10472

Honorable Antonia Arteaga, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellees’ motion for extension of time to file its brief is GRANTED. Appellees’ brief is 

due October 18, 2022.

_________________________________

Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 12th day of September, 2022.

___________________________________

Michael A. Cruz, 

Clerk of Court
No. 51960.

#### W. R. Zanes & Co. *v.*United States,

protest 52408-K (Galveston).

Mollison, Judge:

The merchandise involved in this case is mahogany lumber on which a tax or duty at the rate of $3 per thousand feet, board measure, was assessed by the collector of customs under the provisions of section 3424 of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U. S. C. 1940 ed. §3424). The claim made in the protest is that the said tax or duty was computed and assessed on the basis of .an excessive number of board feet.

The record establishes the correctness of the plaintiff’s claim. It appears that the merchandise was described on the invoice by figures indicating the number of surface or superficial feet, followed by figures indicating the thickness of the lumber. The figures for thickness were given in quarters of an inch, for example, 4/4 indicating lumber one inch thick, and 5/4 indicating lumber one and one-quarter inches thick.

The plaintiff produced as its witness the lumber inspector in the employ of the ultimate consignee who measured and inspected the mahogany'in question. He testified that from the result of his measurement of the shipment with a standard board ruler he found the actual number of board feet contained in the shipment to be within 30 or 40 board feet of the invoiced quantity, 12,099 board feet.

The liquidator in the collector’s office Who liquidated the entry in question testified that he interpreted the figures on the invoice showing superficial or surface feet as indicating merely the length of the pieces of lumber and the following figures which showed the thickness, as indicating the width and thickness. For example, the first item on the invoice is described as follows:

5,035 sf 4/4 No. 1 Com. Mahogany Lumber planed one edge The liquidator took that as meaning a quantity of lumber 5,035 feet long, 4 inches wide, and 4 inches thick, whereas in fact the figure 5,035 represented superficial area, that is, length times width, and the 4/4 showed the lumber to be one inch thick.

The liquidator testified that if the descriptions on the invoice which he took to refer to width and thickness, e. g., 4/4, actually referred to fractions of an inch in thickness, the correct b<?ard measurement of the lumber in question would be as indicated in the invoice, i. e., 12,099 board feet. Since this is shown to be the fact, the protest claim that the tax or duty imposed should be computed on the basis of 12,099 board feet is sustained, and judgment will issue directing the •collector to reliquidate the entry accordingly.
Data from Alcoa Aluminum, Alcoa, TN (4 files)
Case 2:05-cv-02688-PBT Document 19 Filed 06/13/07 Page 1 of 1
No. 59430.

protests 130679-K, etc. (New York).

#### Canada Dry Ginger Ale, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C. C. P. A. 130, C. A. D. 508) and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 55151.

#### Caron Corp’n et al. *v.*United States,

protests 162966-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Olives, C. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Docket No. FAA - 2014 - 0395

Directorate ID 2014 - SW - 016 - AD Costs of Compliance We estimate that this AD w ill affect 75 helicopters of U.S. Registry. We estimate that operators may incur the following costs in order to comply with this AD. At an average labor rate of $85 per work

- hour, inspecting the pulley bolt holes , and installing the tabbed washers will require 6 work hours, and r equired parts will cost $ 10 0, for a cost per helicopter of $ 61 0 and a total cost of $ 45,750 for the fleet. Reviewing instructions, collecting and reviewing information, and submitting a report to the FAA will require 0.5 work

- hour, for a cost per helicopt er of $43 and a cost of $3,225 for the fleet
. If necessary , replacing a pulley will require about 2 work

- hours, and required parts would cost $ 800 , for a total cost per helicopter of $ 970
.