alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017300EN.01002901.xml

| 11.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 300/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 300/29

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 July 2017 — Aristoteleio Panepistimio Thessalonikis v ERCEA

(Case T-348/16 OP) (1)

1

((Arbitration clause - Application to have a judgment set aside - Stay of execution of a judgment by default - Interlocutory judgment))

(2017/C 300/35)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Applicant in the main proceedings: Aristoteleio Panepistimio Thessalonikis (Thessaloniki, Greece) (represented by: V. Christianos, lawyer)

Applicant in the main proceedings:

Defendant in the main proceedings: European Research Council Executive Agency (ERCEA) (represented by: M. Pesquera Alonso and F. Sgritta, acting as Agents, and E. Kourakis, lawyer)

Defendant in the main proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Application to have the judgment of 6 April 2017, Aristoteleio Panepistimio Thessalonikis v ERCEA (T-348/16, not published, EU:T:2017:268) set aside.

Aristoteleio Panepistimio Thessalonikis

ERCEA

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Execution of the judgment of 6 April 2017, Aristoteleio Panepistimio Thessalonikis v ERCEA (T-348/16), is stayed pending the outcome of the application made by the European Research Council Executive Agency (ERCEA) to have that judgment set aside.

---

(1)  OJ C 296, 16.8.2016.

1

---
# C_2018013EN.01001402.xml

| 15.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 13/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 13/14

---

Judgment of the General Court of 20 November 2017 — Cotécnica v EUIPO — Visán Industrias Zootécnicas (cotecnica OPTIMA)

(Case T-465/16) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark cotecnica OPTIMA - Earlier EU figurative mark visán Optima PREMIUM PETFOOD - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 [now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001]))

(2018/C 013/24)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Cotécnica, SCCL (Bellpuig, Spain) (represented by: J.-B. Devaureix, J. Erdozain López and J. Galán López, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Palmero Cabezas and J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Visán Industrias Zootécnicas, SL (Arganda, Spain) (represented by: P. Alesci Naranjo, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 13 June 2016 (Case R 229/2016-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Visán Industrias Zootécnicas and Cotécnica.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Cotécnica, SCCL to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO); |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Cotécnica, SCCL to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO);

| 3. | Orders Visán Industrias Zootécnicas, SL to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Visán Industrias Zootécnicas, SL to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 371, 10.10.2016.

1

---
SPA RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 139: HazardousWaste Management System; Testing and Monitoring Activities I (cont'd)

RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 139
Testing and Monitoring"ActivitiesAmendment I 60 FR 3089-3095 January 13, 1995 (RCRA ClusterV, Non-HSWA provisions)

FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS FEDERAL RCRA CITATION ANALOGOUS STATE CITATION

WAC 173-303· STATE ANALOG IS:

EQUIV· LESS MORE BROADER ALENT STRIN· STRIN· IN SCOPE GENT GENT PART 260 - HAZARDOUSWASTE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM: GENERAL
SUBPART B - DEFINITIONS
REFERENCES 

# • revise reference to 260.11(a) 110(3)(a) 

### X "Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods" by replacing "Updates I and IIA" in the first sentence with "Updates I (July, 1992), II (September, 1994), and IIA (August,1993)"; in the second sentence, replace "Update I" with "Updates I, II, and IIA"; replace the last portion of the second sentence beginning with "; and Update IIA is available from ..." with the new sentence, "Copies may be inspected at

CL139.16- Revised: 11/8/96 Printed: 10/21198 January 13, 1995 - Page 1 of 1**SP~** 

### RCRA REVISION CHECKLIST 139: HazardousWaste Management System; Testing and Monitoring Activities I (cont'd)

FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS FEDERAL RCRA CITATION ANALOGOUS STATE CITATION STATE ANALOG IS:

WAC 173-303· EQUIV- LESS MORE BROADER ALENT STRIN- STRIN- IN SCOPE GENT GENT 

### the Library, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 401 M Street, SW,. Washington, DC 20460."



# o

CL139.16 - Revised: 11/8/96 Printed: 10/21/98 

### January 13, 1995 - Page 2 of 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0142

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

CHEYENE LEILANI – AMBER ZIELIE,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including July 7, 2023, within which to prepare, file, and 

serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

May 31 2023

05/31/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0142
# Sheet1

&"Arial,Bold"Part 1SUPPLEMENT	&"Arial,Bold"DRAFT	&"Arial,Bold"Fiscal Year 2016 ReportingSection VII

&"Arial,Bold"Bulletin No. 2016-05	&"Arial,Bold"DRAFT VII CEDR - &P	&"Arial,Bold"IRC Handout 4/21/16
Exhibit 32.2





Statement of Chief Financial Officer Furnished


Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





The undersigned, Gary F. Hoskins, is the Chief Financial Officer of Citizens South Banking Corporation (the “Company”).





This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the Company of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 (the “Report”).





By execution of this statement, I certify that to the best of my knowledge:





A)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and





B)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods covered by the Report.








August 15, 2011                                                        /s/ Gary F. Hoskins


Dated                                                                          Gary F. Hoskins


Chief Financial Officer








This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  It is not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Citizens South Banking Corporation and will be retained by Citizens South Banking Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# Redirecting to the NCSES Web Archive

This content has been archived and you are about to be redirected to the NCSES Web Archive at archive-it.org. Please be aware, the National Science Foundation's privacy policy does not apply to archive-it.org.
Go to the NCSES Web Archive now =>
Redirecting to the NCSES Web Archive in 7 seconds. Cancel Redirect.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

____________________________________

SIERRA CLUB, )

)

Plaintiff, )

) Case: 1:10-cv-02112-JEB

v. )

)

LISA JACKSON, in her official )

capacity as Administrator, United States )

Environmental Protection Agency, )

)

Defendant. )

____________________________________)

NOTICE OF LODGING

Defendant Lisa Jackson, Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection

Agency (“EPA”), with this notice lodges with the Court a proposed consent decree. 

The proposed consent decree which Defendant lodges today should not be signed or

entered by the Court at this time. Pursuant to section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, 42 U.S.C.

§ 7413(g), the consent decree is not final and cannot be entered by the Court until the EPA

Administrator provides “a reasonable opportunity by notice in the Federal Register to persons

who are not named as parties or intervenors to the action” to comment in writing upon the

proposed decree. After a reasonable public comment period, the EPA Administrator and the

Attorney General, as appropriate, must promptly consider any written comments received. Id. If

the federal government elects not to withdraw or withhold consent to the proposed consent

decree, EPA will promptly file a motion that requests the Court to enter this Consent Decree. 

 Respectfully submitted,

IGNACIA S. MORENO

Assistant Attorney General

Environment and Natural Resources Division

Case 1:10-cv-02112-JEB Document 13 Filed 08/03/11 Page 1 of 2
/s/ Eileen T. McDonough

Environmental Defense Section

Environment and Natural Resources Division

United States Department of Justice

P.O. Box 23896

Washington, D.C. 20026

Tel: (202) 514-3126

Facsimile: (202) 514-8865

Email: eileen.mcdonough@usdoj.gov

OF COUNSEL:

Lea Anderson

US EPA, Office of General Counsel

Case 1:10-cv-02112-JEB Document 13 Filed 08/03/11 Page 2 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

RONNIE POWELL,

Petitioner,

vs.

GERAL ROZUM, et al.,

Respondents.

CIVIL ACTION

No. 05-594

ORDER

On this ____ day of December, 2005, upon careful and independent consideration of the

petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus, and after review of United States Magistrate Judge Linda

K. Caracappa’s Report and Recommendation, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

2. The petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED;

3. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability;

4. The Clerk of Court shall mark this case closed for statistical purposes.

BY THE COURT:

_______________________

Pollak, J.

Case 2:05-cv-00594-LP Document 17 Filed 12/29/05 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32
 Certification pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    the report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and2.
    
    the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Date:  November 9, 2009
    /s/ John R. KoelmelJohn R. KoelmelPresident and Chief Executive OfficerDate:  November 9, 2009
    /s/ Michael W. HarringtonMichael W. HarringtonChief Financial Officer
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF
CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE
  (i)
    
    the Quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September
30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Thomas C. GodlaskyThomas C. GodlaskyChairman, President and Chief Executive OfficerAmerUs Group Co.
SS

- 7039 ( October 2011 ) RDA 1693 1 Department of State

Division of Publications

312 Rosa L. Parks Avenue, 8th Floor Snodgrass/TN Tower
Nashville, TN 37243

Phone: 615

- 741

- 2650

Fax: 615

- 741

- 5133

Email: register.information@tn.gov For Department of State Use Only

Sequence Number:

Rule ID(s) :

File Date:

Effective Date:



# Rulemaking Hearing Rule(s) Filing Form

Rulemaking Hearing Rules are rules filed after and as a result of a rulemaking hearing. T

. C

. A

. § 4

- 5

- 205

Agency/Board/Commission: Environment & Conservation

Division: Air Pollu tion Control

Contact Person: Lacey J. Hardin

Address: 9 th Floor L & C Annex

401 Church Street
Nashville, Tennessee Zip: 37243

- 1531

Phone: (615) 532

- 0 545

Email: Lacey.Hardin@tn.gov

Revision Type (check all that apply):

X Amendment

New Repeal

Rule(s) Revised ( A LL chapters and rules contained in filing must be listed here . If needed, copy and paste

additional tables to accommodate multiple chapters . Please enter only ONE Rule Number/Rule Title per row)

Chapter Number Chapter Title

1200

- 03

- 09 Construction and Operating Permits

Rule Number Rule Title

1200

- 03

- 09

- .01 Construction PermitsSS

- 7039 ( October 2011 ) RDA 1693 2 (Place substance of rules and other info here. Statutory authority must be given for each rule change. For

info rmation on formatting rules go to http://state.tn.us/sos/rules/1360/1360.htm )

Chapter 1200

- 03

- 09 Construction and Operating Permits

Subpart (vi) of part 47 of s ubparagraph (b) of paragraph (4) o f rule 1200

- 03

- 09

- .01 Construction Permits is amended by deleting the subpart part in its entirety and replacing it with a new subpart as follows:

(vi) Particulate Matter (PM) emissions, PM 2.5 emissions and PM 10 emissions shall include gaseous emissions f rom a source or activity which condense to form particulate matter at ambient temperatures. On or after January 1, 2011, such condensable particulate matter shall be accounted for in applicability determinations and in establishing emissions limitations fo r PM, PM 2.5 and PM 10 in PSD permits. Compliance with emissions limitations for PM, PM 2.5 , and PM 10 issued prior to this date shall not be based on condensable particulate matter unless required by the terms and conditions of the permit or the applicable

im plementation plan. Applicability determinations made prior to this date without accounting for condensable particulate matter shall not be considered in violation of this paragraph unless the applicable implementation plan required condensable particulate matter to be included.

Authority: T.C.A. §§ 68

- 201

- 10 1 et seq. and 4

- 5

- 201 et seq.
<Page>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

   The undersigned, Eleanor L. Thomas, President (chief executive officer) of
the managing owner, Prudential Securities Futures Management Inc. (the 'Managing
Owner'), of World Monitor Trust--Series C ('Series C'), hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

   (1) Series C's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September
       26, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
       date hereof (the 'Quarterly Report'), fully complies with the
       requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
       1934; and

   (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
       material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
       Series C.

/s/ Eleanor L. Thomas
------------------------------------------------------
Eleanor L. Thomas
President (chief executive officer) of the Managing Owner
November 10, 2003
EXHIBIT 32.2  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of China Nuvo Solar Energy, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended July 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Barry S. Hollander, Principal Accounting Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company, as of, and for the periods presented in the Report.


| |                             
| | ----------------------------
| | /s/ Barry S. Hollander      
| | Barry S. Hollander          
| | Principal Accounting Officer
| | November 29, 2011           

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to China Nuvo Solar Energy, Inc. and will be retained by China Nuvo Solar Energy, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1584 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1584

   To amend the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 to reauthorize the 
     Judicial Conference of the United States to redact sensitive 
   information contained in financial disclosure reports of judicial 
            officers and employees, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             July 19, 2017

 Mr. Johnson (for himself and Mrs. McCaskill) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 
                   Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Ethics in Government Act of 1978 to reauthorize the 
     Judicial Conference of the United States to redact sensitive 
   information contained in financial disclosure reports of judicial 
            officers and employees, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REDACTION AUTHORITY CONCERNING SENSITIVE SECURITY 
              INFORMATION.

    (a) In General.--Section 105(b)(3) of the Ethics in Government Act 
of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) is amended by striking subparagraph (E).
    (b) Technical Amendments.--Section 105(b)(1) of the Ethics in 
Government Act of 1978 (5 U.S.C. App.) is amended--
            (1) in the first sentence, by striking the second comma 
        after ``as the case may be''; and
            (2) in the third sentence, by inserting a comma after ``as 
        the case may be''.
                                 <all>
```
Before the Second Division,

April 9, 1947

No. 51648.

#### Protests 123900-K, etc., of Men’s Hats, Inc. (Baltimore).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Before the Second Division,

May 3, 1962

No. 66739.

#### Engis Equipment Company et al. *v.*United States,

protests 61/8674-11950, etc. (Chicago).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of talyrond and talysurf apparatus and equipment similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 64440, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

January 27, 2020

No. 04-19-00896-CV

IN RE P.G.D, JR. et al.,

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2019PA00361

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

This is an accelerated appeal of an order terminating the appellant’s parental rights,

which must be disposed of by this court within 180 days of the date the notice of appeal is filed. 

TEX. R. JUD. ADMIN. 6.2. On January 15, 2020, this court notified the court reporter responsible 

for preparing the record that the reporter’s record, which was due to be filed on January 9, 2020,

was late. On the same date, the court reporter filed a notice of late record requesting a fifteen-day 

extension of time to file the reporter’s record. The request is GRANTED. It is ORDERED that 

the reporter’s record must be filed in this appeal no later than January 24, 2020. TEX. R. APP. P.

35.3(c). Further requests for extensions of time will be disfavored.

_________________________________

Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 27th day of January, 2020.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ,

Clerk of Court
January 23, 1945

No. 49971.

Suit 4498.

#### *United States*v. *Kolmar, Inc.*

C. D. 884. Appeal dismissed on stipulation. January 4, 1945.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 12**  **- 7615** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. ELTRENTROSE F. LIVERMAN, a/k/a Trent , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Norfolk
. Rebecca Beach Smith, Chief District Judge. ( 2:95

- cr - 00151

- JBF

- FBS

- 7; 2:12

- cv - 00417

- RBS )

Submitted : January 17, 2013 Decided: January 22, 2013

Before GRE GORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Eltrentrose F. Liverman, Appellant Pro Se. Howard Jacob Zlotnick, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Eltrentrose F. Liverman seeks to appeal the district court’s order construing his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 1651 (2006) as a successive 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2012 ) motion and denying relie f . The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (B) (200 6 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right .” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable o r
wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debata ble, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Liverman has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certif icate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED