alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Before the Second Division,

July 24, 1950

No. 54565.

#### Schlumberger Well Surveying Corp. *v.*United States,

protests 147290-K, etc. (Galveston).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the-

galvanometers and parts thereof are similar in all material respects to the gradi-ometers, gravitymeters, and vertical field balances the subject of *Asiatic Petroleum Corp.*v. *United States*(19 Cust. Ct. 3, C. D. 1058), *American Askania Corp.*v. *United States*(20 id. 302, Abstract 52267), and *American Askania Corporation*v. *United States*(21 id. 26, C. D. 1121), respectively, the claim of the plaintiff was. sustained.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

NATIONAL ORGANIZATION OF VETERANS' 

ADVOCATES, INC.,

Petitioner

v.

SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,

Respondent

______________________ 

2020-1321

______________________ 

Petition for review pursuant to 38 U.S.C. Section 502.

______________________ 

PER CURIAM. 

O R D E R

The parties are requested to file supplemental briefs 

before oral argument addressing the following questions 

related to National Organization of Veterans’ Advocates’ 

(NOVA) Article III standing: 

(1) Are the allegations of the Petition sufficient to establish standing, even without any evidence from 

NOVA, given that the Secretary does not challenge 

standing, or must NOVA submit evidence to establish Article III standing, see Phigenix, Inc. v. Immunogen, Inc., 845 F.3d 1168, 1171–73 (Fed. Cir. 

Case: 20-1321 Document: 87 Page: 1 Filed: 09/15/2020
2 NOVA v. SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS

2017); Shrimpers & Fishermen of RGV v. Texas 

Commission on Environmental Quality, 968 F.3d 

419, 423–24 (5th Cir. 2020) (citing cases from six 

other circuits)?

(2) Is there evidence that, at the time of the Petition, 

NOVA had members with standing to challenge the 

provisions at issue?

(3) Does NOVA have standing on any basis apart from 

having had members who would have had standing 

to challenge the provisions at issue?

IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

Each party shall submit a brief, not to exceed 15 pages, 

along with any evidence (not subject to the page limit), in 

accordance with this Order. NOVA’s filing is due by 

5:00 p.m. on September 22, 2020. The Secretary’s responsive filing is due by 5:00 p.m. on September 29, 2020. 

NOVA may submit a reply brief, not to exceed 5 pages, by 

5:00 p.m. on October 2, 2020. 

If NOVA chooses to make evidentiary submissions, for 

example, in the form of a declaration, the court will deem 

the submissions to be timely.

The court requires 24 paper copies of the supplemental 

briefs provided by the filer within 2 business days from the 

date of electronic filing of the document. Administrative 

Order No. 20-01 does not exempt the filing of these paper 

copies. 

September 15, 2020 

Date

FOR THE COURT

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court

Case: 20-1321 Document: 87 Page: 2 Filed: 09/15/2020
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

 

IN RE: IMMODIUM ADVANCED

ANTITRUST LITIGATION

CIVIL ACTION Nos. 

02-4105

02-4149

02-4180

02-4197

02-4362

02-4386

02-4387

02-4476

02-4530

02-6797

02-6993

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 1st day of December, 2003, pursuant to this court’s Order dated

September 10, 2003 in In re: Immodium Advanced Antitrust Litigation (Civ. A. No. 02-4093,

Doc. No. 24), it is hereby ORDERED that the cases listed above are dismissed.

BY THE COURT:

 

MARVIN KATZ, S.J.

Case 2:02-cv-04386-MK Document 11 Filed 12/02/2003 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

YASSIR HASSAN, : CIVIL ACTION

Petitioner :

:

v. : NO. 05-757

:

ROBERT J. MALVESTUTO, et al, :

Respondents :

O R D E R

STENGEL, J.

AND NOW, this 18th day of August, 2005, upon careful and independent consideration

of the petition for a writ of habeas corpus, and after review of the Report and Recommendation

of Chief United States Magistrate Judge M. Faith Angell, and Petitioner’s Objections thereto, IT

IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.

2. Petitioner’s Objections are OVERRULED.

3. The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED with prejudice as

 untimely.

4. There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability.

5. The Clerk of the Court shall mark this case closed for all purposes.

BY THE COURT:

 /s/ Lawrence F. Stengel 

LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J.

Case 2:05-cv-00757-LS Document 14-1 Filed 08/18/05 Page 1 of 1
<Page>

                                                                    Exhibit 32.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

   The undersigned, Eleanor L. Thomas, President (chief executive officer) of
the managing owner, Prudential Securities Futures Management Inc. (the 'Managing
Owner'), of World Monitor Trust--Series B ('Series B'), hereby certifies,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

   (1) Series B's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending September
       26, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
       date hereof (the 'Quarterly Report'), fully complies with the
       requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
       1934; and

   (2) The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all
       material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
       Series B.

/s/ Eleanor L. Thomas
------------------------------------------------------
Eleanor L. Thomas
President (chief executive officer) of the Managing Owner
November 10, 2003
Exhibit 32.1
 ELECTRO-OPTICAL SCIENCES, INC.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
 
 
 *
    
    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 has been provided to Electro-Optical Sciences, Inc. and will be retained by
Electro-Optical Sciences, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request. This written statement accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is
not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and will not be incorporated by
reference into any filing of Electro-Optical Sciences, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933
or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, irrespective of any general incorporation language
contained in such filing. 35
# C_2017369EN.01001601.xml

| 30.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 369/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 369/16

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 September 2017 — sheepworld v EUIPO (Bester Papa)

(Case T-451/16) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Application for EU word mark Bester Papa - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2017/C 369/23)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: sheepworld AG (Ursensollen, Germany) (represented by: S. von Rüden, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Fischer, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 May 2016 (Case R 94/2016-4) concerning an application for registration of the word sign Bester Papa as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders sheepworld AG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders sheepworld AG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 364, 3.10.2016.

1

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

GEORGE GILMORE : CIVIL ACTION

:

 v. :

:

PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICER :

CHARLES LAYTON, et al. : NO. 02-4379

ORDER

AND NOW, this ___ day of February, 2004, upon

consideration of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s

Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6), it is hereby

ORDERED as follows:

1. Defendants’ motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff filed his

complaint more than two years after the alleged injury occurred,

and therefore his claims are untimely. 

2. All claims against defendants are DISMISSED with

prejudice.

BY THE COURT:

________________________

JAMES T. GILES C.J.

copies by FAX on

to

Case 2:02-cv-04379-JG Document 12 Filed 02/20/2004 Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub., L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces the following meeting:

*Name and Committee Code:*                     Alan T. Waterman Award Committee (#1172).                

*Date and Time:*                     January 29, 2024—12:30 p.m.-5:30 p.m. (Eastern).                

*Place:*                     NSF, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314 (Virtual).                

*Type of Meeting:*                     Closed.                

*Contact Persons:*                     Gayle Pugh Lev, National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314; Telephone: 703-292-7589.                

*Purpose of Meeting:*                     Virtual meeting to provide advice and recommendations in the selection of the Alan T. Waterman Award recipient(s).                

*Agenda:*                     To review and evaluate nominations as part of the selection process for awards to be granted for the Alan T. Waterman Award program.                

*Reason for Closing:*                     The nominations being reviewed include information of a personal nature where disclosure would constitute unwarranted invasions of personal privacy. These matters are exempt under 5 U.S.C. 552b(c), (4) and (6) of the Government in the Sunshine Act.                

Dated: November 9, 2023.

Crystal Robinson,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2023-25277 Filed 11-15-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
# September 2023
No. 58900.

protest 234177-K (Los Angeles).

#### John L. Westland & Son, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial, it was stipulated that if the merchandise were now before the examiner, he would classify it as plates, *7%*inches in diameter, over $3.45 per dozen, dutiable, as claimed, under paragraph 212, as amended, *supra.*In view of the stipulation and following Abstract 58716, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 58464.

protests 211932-K, etc. (New York).

#### Astoria Pan Americana, Inc., and J. J. Boll *v.*United States,

*405Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of ficin powder or *leche de oje en polvo*the same in all material respects as that the subject of *Astoria Pan-Americana, Inc.*v. *United States*(32 Cust. Ct. 243, C. D. 1608), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 175-3 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 1 of 21
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 175-3 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 2 of 21
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 175-3 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 3 of 21
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 175-3 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 4 of 21
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 175-3 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 5 of 21
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 175-3 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 6 of 21
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 175-3 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 7 of 21
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 175-3 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 8 of 21
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 175-3 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 9 of 21
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 175-3 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 10 of 21
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 175-3 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 11 of 21
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 175-3 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 12 of 21
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 175-3 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 13 of 21
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 175-3 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 14 of 21
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 175-3 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 15 of 21
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 175-3 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 16 of 21
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 175-3 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 17 of 21
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 175-3 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 18 of 21
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 175-3 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 19 of 21
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 175-3 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 20 of 21
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 175-3 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 21 of 21
No. 57218. protests 41553-K, etc. (New York).

#### Manchu American Corp. and Schneider Bros. & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the kidskin plates are similar íd all material respects to those the subject of *Kung Chen Fur Corpn.*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Ford, J., concurred.

Mollison, J., dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1480, *supra.*
# C_2022303EN.01003501.xml

| 8.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 303/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 303/35

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 June 2022 — YV and Others v Commission

(Case T-533/16) (1)

(Civil service - Officials - 2014 reform of the Staff Regulations - Reimbursement of annual travel expenses - Place of origin located in a third country - Flat-rate payment calculated on the basis of the distance separating the place of employment from the capital of the Member State of which the official is a national)

(2022/C 303/42)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: YV, YW, YZ (represented by: J.-N. Louis, R. Metz, D. Verbeke, T. Van Lysebeth and N. Maes, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Gattinara and T. Bohr, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: European Parliament (represented by: E. Taneva and M. Ecker, acting as Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and R. Meyer, acting as Agents)

Re:

Applications under Article 270 TFEU for annulment of the decisions to reduce or discontinue, from 1 January 2014, the reimbursement of annual travel expenses enabling the applicants to maintain a connection with their place of origin.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders YV, YW and YZ to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders YV, YW and YZ to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;

| 3. | Orders the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union each to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union each to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 89, 16.3.2015 (case initially registered before the European Civil Service Tribunal under Case No F-10/15 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1.9.2016).

---
No. 65432.

#### Cresca Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 60/14109, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of bread similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. *Nordic Baking & Importing Co., Inc.*(47 C.C.P.A. 78, C.A.D. 733), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           4,883
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   18,859
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,830
<INVENTORY>                                     34,660
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                63,276
<PP&E>                                          53,356
<DEPRECIATION>                                  13,051
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 110,520
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,940
<BONDS>                                        895,747
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      4,000
<COMMON>                                        46,222
<OTHER-SE>                                      14,757
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   110,520
<SALES>                                         20,709
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,389
<CGS>                                           12,419
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,714
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,078
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   188
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,084
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,545
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,727
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,818
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,818
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.15
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.14


</TABLE>
# Dec 19

# image1.jpg
No. 57636.

#### Geo. S. Bush & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 159855-K, etc. (Seattle).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise and the issues are the same in all material respects as those the subject of *John P. Herber & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(30 Cust. Ct. 193, C. D. 1519). In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the cited case, the protests were dismissed, and the matters were remanded to a single judge sitting in reappraisement for determination of the value of the merchandise in the manner provided by law (28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d)).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

J. BRAD HARRON,

Plaintiff,

v.

J. ROBERT CARTWRIGHT and

UPPER MOUNT BETHEL TOWNSHIP

Defendants.

Civil Action No. 05-1538

MEMORANDUM/ORDER

August 17, 2007

On March 29, 2007, defendants filed “Defendants’ Second Motion for Judgment

on the Pleadings or, in the Alternative, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Action

Pursuant to Rule 41(b)” (Docket # 10). On October 26, 2005, defendants filed

“Defendants’ Motion to Grant as Uncontested Defendants’ Second Motion for Judgment

on the Pleadings or, in the Alternative, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Action

Pursuant to Rule 41(b)” (Docket # 11). Each of these motions was accompanied by a

certificate of service indicating that each motion had been served on plaintiff’s counsel of

record. Plaintiff has not responded to either motion. The motion for judgment on the

pleadings will therefore be granted as unopposed pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(c).

It is hereby ORDERED that “Defendants J. Robert Cartwright and Upper Mount

Case 2:05-cv-01538-LP Document 12 Filed 08/20/07 Page 1 of 2
2

Bethel Township’s Motion for Partial Judgment on the Pleadings” (Docket # 10) is

GRANTED. Plaintiff’s complaint is DISMISSED. It is further ORDERED that

“Defendants’ Motion to Grant as Uncontested Defendants’ Second Motion for Judgment

on the Pleadings or, in the Alternative, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Action

Pursuant to Rule 41(b)” (Docket # 11) is DISMISSED as MOOT.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Louis H. Pollak

 

Pollak, J.

8/17/2007

Case 2:05-cv-01538-LP Document 12 Filed 08/20/07 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

                 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of IQ Biometrix, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael
Walsh, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                             /s/ Michael Walsh
                                             -----------------------------
                                             Michael Walsh
                                             Chief Financial Officer

February 17, 2004