alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(Reap. Dec. 10685)

#### Elof Hansson, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry Nos. 7496; 5832.

(Decided February 19, 1964)

*Sharp*<£• *Bogan*for the plaintiff.

*John*TV. *Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Rao, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, annexed to this decision and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the undersigned, subject to the approval of the Court:

> 1. That the subject merchandise consists of hardboard exported from Sweden as to which the Secretary of the Treasury issued a finding of dumping, published in 89 TD 197 TD 53567, made pursuant to the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.O., 160, et se<p).

> 2. That pursuant to Section 168 of Said Antidumping Aot, the appraiser reported the purchase price (Sec. 162) and the foreign market value (Sec. 164) as to the merchandise listed on Schedule A attached hereto and made a part hereof.

> 3. That pursuant to Sections 500 and 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, the appraiser appraised all of the merchandise in the appeals for appraisement enumerated on Schedule A for regular duty purposes.

> 4. That the plaintiff duly filed appeals for reappraisement as to the values referred to in the above paragraphs Nos. 2 and 3.

> 5. That at the times relevant herein the purchase price and the foreign market value under the said Antidumping Act are as specified in the aforesaid Schedule A attached hereto.

> 6. That as to ah other items of merchandise not identified on Schedule A, the appraiser’s reports of purchase price and of foreign market value 'are correct.

> 7. That the appraiser’s findings of value under the provisions of Section 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, are correct.

> *4608. That said appeals are submitted for decision upon this stipulation and said Schedule A.

Upon the agreed facts, I find foreign market value, as defined in section 164 of the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C. § 164), for the merchandise described in said schedule A, and the purchase price thereof, within section 162 of said act (19 U.S.C. §162), to be as indicated in said schedule. As of all other items of merchandise not identified in schedule A, I find the foreign market values and purchase prices to be as reported by the appraiser. In all other respects, the values of all merchandise are as returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
No. 54568.

#### B. Altman & Co. *v.*United States,

protests 23800-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all

material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). The claim of the plaintiff was-therefore sustained.
#   1

#   2

#   3

#   4

#   5

#   6

#   7

#   8

#   9

#   10

#   11

#   12

#   13

#   14

#   15

#   16

#   17

#   18

#   19

#   20

#   21

#   22

#   23

#   24

#   25

#   26

#   27

#   28

#   29

#   30

#   31

#   32

#   33

#   34

#   35

#   36

#   37

#   38

#   39

#   40

#   41

#   42

#   43

#   44

#   45

#   46

#   47

#   48

#   49

#   50

#   51

#   52

#   53

#   54

#   55

#   56

#   57

#   58

#   59

#   60

#   61

#   62

#   63

#   64

#   65

#   66

# Sheet1
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 56 Filed 06/04/2007 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:02-cv-20143-HB     Document 5      Filed 03/01/2004     Page 1 of 5

Case 2:02-cv-20143-HB     Document 5      Filed 03/01/2004     Page 2 of 5

Case 2:02-cv-20143-HB     Document 5      Filed 03/01/2004     Page 3 of 5

Case 2:02-cv-20143-HB     Document 5      Filed 03/01/2004     Page 4 of 5

Case 2:02-cv-20143-HB     Document 5      Filed 03/01/2004     Page 5 of 5
No. 55164.

#### The Leonard Granite Co. *v.*United States,

protest 158707-K (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

From an examination of the papers in the case the court was unable to find any evidence sufficient to overcome the action of the collector which was presumptively correct. The protest was therefore overruled.
No. 76-144.

#### Matsushita Electric Corporation of America *v.*City of Farmers Branch et al.

Sup. Ct. Tex. Certiorari denied.
# C_2021462EN.01003401.xml

| 15.11.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 462/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.11.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 462/34

---

Judgment of the General Court of 22 September 2021 — NLMK v Commission

(Case T-752/16) (1)

(Dumping - Imports of certain cold-rolled flat steel products originating in China and Russia - Definitive anti-dumping duty - Article 18 of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (now Article 18 of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036) - Use of facts available - Article 3(2) and (5) of Regulation No 1225/2009 (now Article 3(2) and (5) of Regulation 2016/1036) - Determination of injury - Article 3(7) of Regulation No 1225/2009 (now Article 3(7) of Regulation 2016/1036) - Causal link - Article 2(9) and Article 9(4) of Regulation No 1225/2009 (now Article 2(9) and Article 9(4) of Regulation 2016/1036) - Elimination of injury - Rights of the defence - Equality of arms - Principle of good administration - Obligation to state reasons - Proportionality - Manifest errors of assessment)

(2021/C 462/39)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Novolipetsk Steel PJSC (NLMK) (Lipetsk, Russia) (represented by: D. O’Keeffe, Solicitor, N. Tuominen and M. Krestiyanova, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J.-F. Brakeland, K. Blanck and E. Schmidt, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Eurofer, European Steel Association, ASBL, (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: O. Prost, A. Coelho Dias and S. Seeuws, lawyers)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1328 of 29 July 2016 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain cold-rolled flat steel products originating in the People’s Republic of China and the Russian Federation (OJ 2016 L 210, p. 1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Novolipetsk Steel PJSC (NLMK) to bear, in addition to its own costs, those incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Novolipetsk Steel PJSC (NLMK) to bear, in addition to its own costs, those incurred by the European Commission;

| 3. | Orders Eurofer, European Steel Association, ASBL, to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Eurofer, European Steel Association, ASBL, to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 14, 16.1.2017.

---
**OFFICE OF**  **THE ATTORNEY**  **GENERAL OF**  **TEXAS AUSTIN** 

**Honorable** Robert H, rood Comlttee to InrostlgateRentals **EOWO Of**  **RepreSentatiVMI** Austin, Texas Dear Sir:

th reference to **the ab:ve**  **matte \**  attontlon,but

iw mg 

### attention not before this besn nnsneree. 

### ladlctloa the Lt&~~aturs fuadr, alloostsd to this

yours very truly
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

 

KEVIN MITCHELL ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 vs. ) 

 ) Civil Action No. 02-CV-4442 

EXPERIAN INFORMATION ) 

SOLUTIONS, INC. ) 

 and ) 

CBA INFORMATION SERVICES ) 

 and ) 

BP/CITIBANK SD ) 

 and ) 

CAPITAL ONE BANK ) 

 and ) 

CROSS COUNTRY BANK ) 

 and ) 

DELL FINANCIAL SERVICES ) 

 and ) 

ORCHARD BANK ) 

 and ) 

PROVIDIAN FINANCIAL ) 

 Defendants. ) 

 ) 

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

TO THE CLERK OF COURT: 

 Kindly enter the appearance of John Soumilas, Esquire, on behalf of Plaintiff in the 

above-captioned matter. 

Respectfully submitted, 

FRANCIS & MAILMAN, P.C. 

BY: ____________________________ 

 JAMES A. FRANCIS, ESQUIRE 

 MARK D. MAILMAN, ESQUIRE 

 JOHN SOUMILAS, ESQUIRE 

 Land Title Building, 19th Floor 

 100 South Broad Street 

 Philadelphia, PA 19110 

 (215) 735-8600 

Dated: November 10, 2003 

Case 2:02-cv-04442-JF Document 34 Filed 11/10/2003 Page 1 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

 

KEVIN MITCHELL ) 

 Plaintiff, ) 

 vs. ) 

 ) Civil Action No. 02-CV-4442 

EXPERIAN INFORMATION ) 

SOLUTIONS, INC. ) 

 and ) 

CBA INFORMATION SERVICES ) 

 and ) 

BP/CITIBANK SD ) 

 and ) 

CAPITAL ONE BANK ) 

 and ) 

CROSS COUNTRY BANK ) 

 and ) 

DELL FINANCIAL SERVICES ) 

 and ) 

ORCHARD BANK ) 

 and ) 

PROVIDIAN FINANCIAL ) 

 Defendants. ) 

 ) 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I, John Soumilas, Esquire, hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the foregoing 

Entry of Appearance was served by regular mail on: 

Howard R. Maniloff, Esquire 

Tabas & Rosen, P.C. 

1845 Walnut Street 

22nd Floor 

Philadelphia, PA 19103 

 

FRANCIS & MAILMAN, P.C. 

BY: ____________________________ 

 JAMES A. FRANCIS, ESQUIRE 

 MARK D. MAILMAN, ESQUIRE 

 JOHN SOUMILAS, ESQUIRE 

 Land Title Building, 19th Floor 

 100 South Broad Street 

 Philadelphia, PA 19110 

 (215) 735-8600 

Dated: November 10, 2003 

Case 2:02-cv-04442-JF Document 34 Filed 11/10/2003 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:02-cv-04442-JF Document 34 Filed 11/10/2003 Page 3 of 3
Order filed, June 19, 2018.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-18-00395-CR

 14-18-00396-CR

____________

MARQUS SIRLS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 338th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1541904, 1542051

ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due June 18, 2018. See Tex. R. App. 

P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. 

The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record has not 

been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Julia Johnson, the court reporter, to file the record in this appeal 

within 15 days of the date of this order. 

PER CURIAM
0 - 1 >1 - 3 >3 - 5 >5 - 10

U.S. Treasuries:

 Bills, Notes, Bonds, FRNs, TIPS 99% 99% 98% 97%

 STRIPS 97% 97% 97% 96%

U.S. Government Guaranteed Agencies:

 Bills, Notes, Bonds 1 99% 99% 98% 97%

 U.S. Government Sponsored Enterprises:

 Bills, Notes, Bonds 1 98% 98% 97% 96%

International Agencies:

 Bills, Notes, Bonds 1 97% 97% 97% 96%

Municipal Bonds2 97% - 98% 97% - 98% 96% - 97% 93% - 95%

Corporate Bonds

 Highest Credit Quality 3 98% 97% - 98% 96% - 97% 94% - 96%

 Acceptable Credit Quality 2 91% - 98% 87% - 97% 87% - 96% 87% - 94%

U.S. Residential Covered Bonds3 98% 98% 97% 96%

Asset-Backed Securities3 98% 98% 96% 91%

Mortgage Backed Securities (MBS)4 98% 98% 97% 96%

Collateralized Mortgage Obligations3,4 97% 97% 97% 96%

Non-Agency Residential MBS3 81% 81% 81% 81%

Bankers' Acceptances3 98% 98% 97%

Commercial Paper3 98%

U.S. Government Agency Guaranteed Loans 

Student Loans

Notes:

1 Zero coupon bonds will be subject to a margin reduction.

4 U.S. Government or Guaranteed Agencies and Government Sponsored Enterprises (GSEs) only.

3 Acceptable if the obligations are “investment grade” as that term is defined in 12 CFR part 1, except that the risk of default by an obligor is very low and the pledgor 

has assessed the credit risk of the obligations in accordance with the due diligence requirements provided in the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency’s 

Supervisory Guidance on Due Diligence Requirements in Determining Whether Securities are Eligible for Investment.

DURATION BUCKETS

Margins for Loans

(% of Internal Fair Market Value Estimate)

* This document is for informational purposes only and subject to change without notice.

 It is not binding on either the Treasury or the Federal Reserve System in any particular transaction.

20% - 95%

Fixed Rate Loans

92%

89% - 92%

70% - 95%

Depositaries and Financial Agents of the Federal Government

31 CFR Part 202

Collateral Margins Table* 

Effective: November 1, 2023

Floating Rate Loans

90% - 92%

85% - 92%

90%

Individually Deposited Loans

>10

95%

94%

All pledged collateral must be transferable and owned by the depositary free and clear of all liens, charges, and claims. 

A detailed list of acceptable collateral for the 202 Program can be obtained from www.treasurydirect.gov.

Securities

94%

94%

95%

89%

Margins for Securities

(% of Market Value or Internal Fair Market Value Estimate)

94%

81%

86% - 95%

2 Acceptable if the obligations are “investment grade” as that term is defined in 12 CFR part 1, whereby the risk of default by an obligor is low and the pledgor has 

assessed the credit risk of the obligations in accordance with the due diligence requirements provided in the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency’s Supervisory 

Guidance on Due Diligence Requirements in Determining Whether Securities are Eligible for Investment.

15% - 95%
EXHIBIT NO. 32.1
Form 10-KSB
Network Capital, Inc.
File No. 000-32155

          CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
            PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Network Capital, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the year ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Bruce Cairney,  Chief
Executive and Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: May 19, 2004                            By: /s/ Bruce Cairney
      ------------                               -------------------------------
                                                                   Bruce Cairney
                                                             Chief Executive and
                                                         Chief Financial Officer

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to Network Capital,  Inc. and will be retained by Network Capital, Inc.
and  furnished  to the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  or its staff upon
request.
Part 1

SUPPLEMENT

DRAFT Fiscal Year 2023 Reporting

Section VII

No Name Description Rule Attribute Combination

99E USSGL Reimbursable Flag "R" Restriction

The use of some USSGL accounts with 

Reimbursable Flag "R" is limited to specific 

TAS. 

USSGL ACCOUNT 

NUMBER

CONCATENATED 

TAS 

Pass 438200 455 X4110000

Pass 438400 097 X4555000 

Data Validations - Detail

U.S. Standard General Ledger

Bulletin No. 2023-08 DRAFT VII VDR - 1 IRC Handout 4/20/23
No. 66771.

#### Ace Import Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 61/18419 and 61/18420 (New York).

*454Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of glass paperweights similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 64185, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 65436.

#### Hafnia Ham Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 59/18175 (Galveston).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise described as 285 cases of Mini Fynbo cheese is, in fact, Gouda cheese containing 40 percent or more of butter fat, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Appendix 8 Demand Letter Checklist

A8-1

The following information should be included in a Federal agency's written

communication(s) with a debtor at least 60-days prior to referring a delinquent debt to the

U.S. Department of the Treasury's Financial Management Service for debt collection

(cross-servicing). The information may be included in one letter or a series of letters.

Agencies should consult with agency counsel to determine what, if any, additional

information is required. Letters should be tailored to meet agency-specific and debtspecific statutory and regulatory requirements.

 Nature and amount of the debt, including the basis for the debt.

 Explanation of how interest, penalties, and administrative costs are added to the

debt.

 Date by which payment should be made to avoid late charges and enforced

collection (generally, 30 days from the date the demand letter is mailed).

 Name, address, and phone number of a contact person or office within the creditor

agency.

 Explain the agency's intent to enforce collection if debtor fails to pay by taking one

or more of the following actions:

o Offset the debtor's Federal payments, including income tax

refunds, salary, certain benefit payments (such as Social Security),

retirement, vendor, and travel reimbursements and advances.

o Refer the debt to a private collection agency.

o Report the debt to a credit bureau.

o Garnish the debtor's wages through administrative wage

garnishment (no court order required).

o Refer the debt to the Department of Justice for litigation (comply

with Executive Order 12988).

o Refer the debt to the U.S. Department of the Treasury for any of 

the above-described collection actions (advise debtor that agencies

are required to refer when debt is 120 or 180 days delinquent

depending on circumstances).
A8-2

Demand Letter Checklist

 Explain how debtor exercises the opportunity to:

o Inspect and copy agency's records related to the debt.

o Request a review of agency's determination of the debt.

o If applicable, request a waiver.

o For purposes of salary offset or administrative wage garnishment,

request a hearing.

o Enter into a reasonable written repayment agreement.

 Advise the debtor of the following:

o Notify agency if bankruptcy filed.

o Penalties for knowingly making false or frivolous statements.

o Excess collections will be refunded to the debtor, unless prohibited

by law.

o For Federal salary offset, up to 15% of current net disposable pay

may be deducted every pay period until the debt is paid.

o For joint income tax filers, spouse should file Form 8379 with the

IRS to claim his/her share of tax refund.
# C_2017144EN.01004502.xml

| 8.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 144/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 144/45

---

Order of the General Court of 8 March 2017 — Popescu v Romania

(Case T-380/16)

((Manifest lack of jurisdiction))

(2017/C 144/62)

Language of the case: Romanian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Doina Popescu (Slatina, Romania) (represented by: M. Ispas, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Romania

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application seeking to obtain, first, the conviction of several Romanian national authorities for alleged criminal acts and, second, compensation for the damage allegedly suffered by the applicant.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | Ms Doina Popescu shall bear her own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Ms Doina Popescu shall bear her own costs.

---
Order entered May 6 , 2013

In The



## Court of Appeals

**Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**

No. 05

- 13

- 00571

- CV

IN RE CHARLES HENSLE Y MITCHELL, Relator

On Appeal from the 68th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC11

- 14792



### O RD ER

Before Justices FitzGerald, Lang, and Myers

Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, we DENY relator’s petition for writ of

mandamus. We ORDER that relator bear the costs of this original proceeding.

/s/ DOUGLAS S. LANG

JUSTICE
Before the Third Division,

March 11, 1948

No. 52220.

protest 75402-K (Norfolk)

#### Western Operating Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the issue, vessel, and facts herein are the same in all material respects as those involved in *United States*v. *Western Operating Corp.*(35 C. C. P. A. 71, C. A. D. 373). The claim of the plaintiff was therefore sustained.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [B-57-2023]

      ( print page 77952)    
AIAC International Pharma, LLC submitted a notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board (the Board) for its facility in Arecibo, Puerto Rico within Subzone 61D. The notification conforming to the requirements of the Board's regulations (15 CFR 400.22) was received on November 7, 2023.

                    Pursuant to 15 CFR 400.14(b), FTZ production activity would be limited to the specific foreign-status material(s)/component(s) and specific finished product(s) described in the submitted notification (summarized below) and subsequently authorized by the Board. The benefits that may stem from conducting production activity under FTZ procedures are explained in the background section of the Board's website—accessible via                     *www.trade.gov/​ftz.*                     The proposed finished product(s) and material(s)/component(s) would be added to the production authority that the Board previously approved for the operation, as reflected on the Board's website.                

The proposed finished product is Janumet® XR tablets (sitagliptin and metformin hydrochloride extended release) (duty-free).

The proposed foreign-status material/component is metformin hydrochloride active pharmaceutical ingredient (duty-free).

                    Public comment is invited from interested parties. Submissions shall be addressed to the Board's Executive Secretary and sent to:                     *ftz@trade.gov.*                     The closing period for their receipt is December 26, 2023.                

A copy of the notification will be available for public inspection in the “Online FTZ Information System” section of the Board's website.

                    For further information, contact Christopher Wedderburn at                     *Chris.Wedderburn@trade.gov.*

Dated: November 7, 2023.

Elizabeth Whiteman,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2023-24995 Filed 11-13-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
EXHIBIT 23











CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Registration No. 333-156601), Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-128256), Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-122701), Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-75346), and Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-159986) of The Phoenix Companies, Inc. of our report dated March 7, 2011 relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in this Form 10-K.







/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Hartford, Connecticut

March 7, 2011