alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Energy Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
 Docket Nos.20SD 8me LLC
EG23-243-000Bright Arrow Solar, LLC
EG23-244-000Montgomery Ranch Wind Farm, LLC
EG23-245-000Shamrock Wind, LLC
EG23-246-000Pioneer Hutt Wind Energy LLC
EG23-247-000BRP Hydra BESS LLC
EG23-248-000BRP Paleo BESS LLC
EG23-249-000BRP Pavo BESS LLC
EG23-250-000BRP Tortolas BESS LLC
EG23-251-000BRP Dickens BESS LLC
EG23-252-000Mockingbird Solar Center, LLC
EG23-253-000Cereal City Solar, LLC
EG23-254-000AES WR Limited Partnership
EG23-255-000High Banks Wind, LLC
EG23-256-000Hardy Hills Solar Energy LLC
EG23-257-000Grover Hill Wind, LLC
EG23-258-000Wildflower Solar 2 LLC
EG23-259-000Wildflower Solar 3 LLC
EG23-260-000Richfield Solar Energy LLC
EG23-261-000Steel Solar, LLC
EG23-262-000Parliament Solar LLC
EG23-263-000North Bend Wind Project LLC
EG23-264-000Five Wells Storage LLC
EG23-265-000Walnut Bend Solar LLC
EG23-266-000SCEF 1 Fuel Cell, LLC
EG23-267-000Longhorn Storage LLC
EG23-269-000Hunter Solar, LLC
EG23-270-000Arche Energy Project, LLC
EG23-271-000El Sol Energy Storage LLC
EG23-272-000Five Wells Solar Center LLC
EG23-273-000Hopkins Energy LLC
EG23-274-000Myrtle Storage, LLC
EG23-275-000Mammoth North LLC
EG23-276-000
 Take notice that during the month of October 2023, the status of the above-captioned entities as Exempt Wholesale Generators became effective by operation of the Commission's regulations. 18 CFR 366.7(a) (2022). Dated: November 2, 2023. Debbie-Anne A. Reese, Deputy Secretary.


[FR Doc. 2023-24739 Filed 11-8-23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
Before the Second Division,

June 24, 1943

No. 48429.

#### Protests 87854-K, etc., of Artmart Linen Co., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
----

Euro exchange rates (1)

24 August 2006

(2006/C 202/01)

1 euro= 

----

(1)

Source: reference exchange rate published by the ECB.

----
Case 2:02-cv-04403-PBT Document 4 Filed 11/07/2002 Page 1 of 7
Case 2:02-cv-04403-PBT Document 4 Filed 11/07/2002 Page 2 of 7
Case 2:02-cv-04403-PBT Document 4 Filed 11/07/2002 Page 3 of 7
Case 2:02-cv-04403-PBT Document 4 Filed 11/07/2002 Page 4 of 7
Case 2:02-cv-04403-PBT Document 4 Filed 11/07/2002 Page 5 of 7
Case 2:02-cv-04403-PBT Document 4 Filed 11/07/2002 Page 6 of 7
Case 2:02-cv-04403-PBT Document 4 Filed 11/07/2002 Page 7 of 7
|  | WASTESRecent                                                                                 Additions | Contact                                                                                 Us |                                                                                 Print                                                                                 Version                                                                                 Search:                                                                                 EPA                     Home >                     Wastes> Your                     Home & Community/R                     Publications > Reusable News |
|--|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

||
||
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ROSITA M. CHARLES, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

 v. 

OFFICE OF NAVAJO & HOPI INDIAN 

RELOCATION, an Administrative Agency 

of the United States, 

Defendant-Appellant.

No. 17-17258 

D.C. No. 3:16-cv-08188-SPL 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Steven Paul Logan, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted May 17, 2019

San Francisco, California

Before: McKEOWN and GOULD, Circuit Judges, and BATTAGLIA,** District 

Judge.

The Office of Navajo & Hopi Indian Relocation (“ONHIR”) appeals the 

district court’s grant of summary judgment to Rosita M. Charles (“R. Charles”) 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The Honorable Anthony J. Battaglia, United States District Judge for 

the Southern District of California, sitting by designation.

FILED

MAY 28 2019

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 17-17258 

reversing the ONHIR’s denial of the application for relocation benefits and 

remanding the case to the ONHIR for an award of relocation assistance benefits. We 

review de novo the district court’s grant of summary judgment. Brunozzi v. Cable 

Commc’ns, Inc., 851 F.3d 990, 995 (9th Cir. 2017). We review the ONHIR’s 

decision to determine if it was “arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, . . . 

otherwise not in accordance with law,” or “unsupported by substantial evidence.” 

5 U.S.C. § 706(2). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we reverse the 

district court’s grant of summary judgment and affirm the ONHIR’s denial of 

relocation assistance benefits.

The “substantial and recurring contacts” standard applied by the district court 

is no longer the correct standard under current regulations. The correct standard is 

“intent to reside combined with manifestations of that intent.” 49 Fed. Reg. 22,277. 

Under the correct standard, the ONHIR’s determination to deny benefits to R. 

Charles was supported by substantial evidence. It is undisputed that R. Charles 

became a head of household in 1983. In 1983, R. Charles joined the Many Farms 

Chapter. R. Charles testified that she continued to visit her aunt’s residence in 

Teesto. However, the ONHIR reasonably relied upon R. Charles’ voluntary decision 

to join the Many Farms Chapter at the time she became a head of household. The 

ONHIR concluded that R. Charles failed to meet her burden of proving that, once 

she became a head of household, she was a “legal resident” of Teesto, which was 
3 17-17258 

designated Hopi Partitioned Land. 25 C.F.R. §§ 700.97(a), 700.147(b). In light of 

the substantial deference afforded to such agency determinations, we observe no 

reversible error in the ONHIR’s conclusion.

REVERSED AND REMANDED FOR THE DISTRICT COURT TO 

AFFIRM THE ONHIR.
<ASX version="3.0">	<ENTRY>		<REF HREF="mms://multimedia.mcpa.virginia.edu/911/hearing10/2004041301_low.asf" />	</ENTRY></ASX>
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Artis Charles Harrell v. Jerome Godinich, Jr.

Appellate case number: 01-16-00338-CV

Trial court case number: 2014-63129

Trial court: 190th District Court of Harris County

Appellant, Artis Charles Harrell, has filed a notice of appeal of the trial court’s order of 

dismissal and an affidavit of inability to pay costs on appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(a)(2), 

(c)(1), (d). The clerk’s record on indigence reflects that, on April 28, 2016, the district clerk 

timely filed a contest to the affidavit. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(e)(1). The trial court, therefore,

was required to conduct a hearing or sign an order extending the time to conduct the hearing by 

May 9, 2016. See TEX. R. APP. P. 4.1, 20.1(i)(2), (3). And to properly sustain the contest, the 

trial court was required to sign an order no later than May 9, 2016, the date on which the contest 

was set for a hearing by submission. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(i)(4). The trial court signed the 

order sustaining the contest on May 10, 2016. Accordingly, the allegations in the affidavit are 

deemed true, and appellant is entitled to proceed without advance payment of costs. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 20.1(i)(4); In re G.C., 22 S.W.3d 932, 932–33 (Tex. 2000) (concluding, because trial 

court did not sign order sustaining indigence contest or extending time for hearing within ten 

days after contest filed, rule deemed allegations in affidavit of indigence as true, and authorized

appellant to proceed with appeal without prepayment of costs).

The Clerk of this Court is directed to make an entry in this Court’s records that appellant 

is indigent and allowed to proceed on appeal without advance payment of costs.

Although the district clerk filed a clerk’s record on indigence, the clerk has not filed a 

clerk’s record for the appellate record. See TEX. R. APP. P. 34.1, 34.5(a), 35.1, 35.3(a)(2). 

Accordingly, the district clerk is directed to file with this Court, within 30 days of the date 

of this order and at no cost to appellant, a clerk’s record containing the items specified in 

Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.5(a) and any additional items requested by any 

party. See TEX. R. APP. P. 20.1(k), 34.5(a), (b).

The court reporter has filed an information sheet indicating that there is no reporter’s 

record in this appeal.
Appellant’s brief is due within 30 days after the date the clerk’s record is filed in this 

Court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a).

Finally, appellant has filed a motion asking the Court to order the district clerk to forward 

the clerk’s record on indigency to this Court and forward a copy of that clerk’s record to 

appellant. Because the district clerk has filed the clerk’s record on indigency in this Court and 

appellant may proceed without advance payment of costs, we dismiss appellant’s motion as 

moot. 

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Terry Jennings

 Acting individually 

Date: July 28, 2016
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<CIK> 0001051818
<NAME> FLAGSTAR CAPITAL CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                          12,030
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                        115,157
<ALLOWANCE>                                        250
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 129,546
<DEPOSITS>                                           0
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                469
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                     57,500
<COMMON>                                         1,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      70,577
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 129,546
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  1,764
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                    0
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 1,764
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                                0
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    104
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,660
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                       1,660
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,660
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.44
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.44
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                   6.798
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   250
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  250
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               250
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
<PAGE>   1



                                   EXHIBIT 11
                          Flagstar Capital Corporation
                      Computation of Net Earnings per Share


Earnings per common share are computed by subtracting from the applicable
earnings the dividend requirements on preferred stock to arrive at earnings
available to common stock and dividing this amount by the weighted average
number of common stock outstanding during the period.

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                          For the quarter ended March 31,
                                                        2000                          1999
                                                     ----------                    ----------
                                                         (In thousands, except share data)
<S>                                                 <C>                           <C>
Net earnings                                         $    1,660                    $    1,778
Less: preferred stock dividends                           1,222                         1,222
                                                     ----------                    ----------
Net earnings available to common
     stockholders                                    $      438                           556
                                                     ==========                    ==========
Average common shares outstanding                     1,000,000                     1,000,000

Net earnings per share - basic                       $     0.44                    $     0.56
</TABLE>





In order to calculate net earnings per share of common stock, the Company must
first subtract the dividend requirements of the Series A Preferred Shares to
arrive at net earnings available to the common stockholders. Net earnings per
share is calculated by dividing net earnings available to common stockholders by
the average number of common shares outstanding during the period.















12
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

February 14, 2022

No. 04-21-00471-CR

Caleb Patrick DANIELS,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 81st Judicial District Court, Frio County, Texas

Trial Court No. 18-10-00155-CRF

Honorable Russell Wilson, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

The reporter’s record was due on February 1, 2022. The reporter’s record was not filed. 

However, on February 9, 2022, the court reporter, Liche M. Cavazos, filed a notification of late 

record, requesting until March 1, 2022 to complete and file the record. 

We grant the motion and order Liche M. Cavazos to file the record by March 1, 

2022. See TEX. R. APP. P. 35.3(c) (extension of time to file record in ordinary appeal must not 

exceed 30 days). 

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 14th day of February, 2022.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
No. 51618.

#### Protests 6295-K, etc., of Bloomingdale Bros., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Olivee, P. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Report of ZymoGenetics, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-K), I, Bruce L.A. Carter, Chief Executive Officer and James A. Johnson, Chief
Financial Officer, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Form 10-K fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C 78m or 78o(d)); and



(2) The information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: March 11,
2005



/s/ BRUCE L.A. CARTERBruce L.A. CarterChief Executive Officer/s/ JAMES A. JOHNSONJames A. JohnsonChief Financial Officer
Case 2:02-cv-04444-PBT Document 27 Filed 04/14/2005 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:02-cv-04444-PBT Document 27 Filed 04/14/2005 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:02-cv-04444-PBT Document 27 Filed 04/14/2005 Page 3 of 3
|  Name      of Entity                                             |   | State      of Incorporation/Jurisdiction |   |  Doing      Business As                  |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------|
| § Southern      Indiana Gas and Electric Company, Inc. |   | Indiana                                  |   | Vectren      Energy Delivery of Indiana, Inc. |
| § Indiana Gas      Company, Inc.                            |   | Indiana,      Ohio                       |   | Vectren      Energy Delivery of Indiana, Inc. |
| § Vectren      Energy Delivery of Ohio, Inc.                |   | Ohio                                     |   |                                          |
Meeting Record | The White House

http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/2060_meeting_08292013 [9/13/2013 8:30:52 AM] Get Email Updates Contact Us

Home • The Administration • Office of Management and Budget

REGULATION & INFORMATION POLICY 

### About OIRA Information Policy Federal Collection of Information Regulatory Matters

Meetings and Outside Communication Reports to Congress For Agencies Statistical Programs & Standards 

# Meeting Record

Meeting Record Regarding: Standards of Performance for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from New Stationary Sources: Electric Utility Generation Units Date: 8 / 29 / 2013

Name Affiliation Client (if applicable) Bob Wayland EPA
Nick Hudson EPA Barry Ellman EPA
Bruce Rodan OSTP
Anne Finken CEQ Phillip Foy CEQ Drew McConville CEQ Doug Carter CURC
John Novak NRECA Adam Bing UMWA
Robert Hilton Alston
Patrick Wilson Bobcock + Wilcox Jim Laity OMB/OIRA Ben Yarnagatta CURC Nathan Frey OMB/OIRA

Meeting material provided to OMB ( pages, kb)

Document 1 (42 pages, 857 kb) Document 2 (1 page, 187 kb) 

### About OMBlog The Budget Management Regulation & Information Policy Legislative Information Join OMB Contact OMB

Home Briefing Room Your Weekly Address Issues Civil Rights The Administration
President Barack Obama About the White House
Inside the White House Our Government
The Executive Branch Federal Register | Join OMB | FOIA | No FEAR Act | OMB Locator | USA.Gov | Accessibility | Privacy Policy | Site SearchMeeting Record | The White House

http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/2060_meeting_08292013 [9/13/2013 8:30:52 AM] The White House Blog Photos & Videos
Photo Galleries Video Performances Live Streams Podcasts Speeches & Remarks Press Briefings Statements & Releases White House Schedule Presidential Actions Legislation Nominations & Appointments Disclosures Defense Disabilities Economy Education Energy & Environment Ethics Equal Pay Foreign Policy Health Care Homeland Security Immigration Refinancing Rural Service Seniors & Social Security Snapshots Taxes Technology Urban and Economic Mobility Veterans Violence Prevention Women Vice President Joe Biden First Lady Michelle Obama Dr. Jill Biden The Cabinet White House Staff Executive Office of the President Other Advisory Boards Presidents First Ladies The Oval Office The Vice President's Residence & Office Eisenhower Executive Office Building Camp David Air Force One White House Fellows White House Internships Tours & Events Mobile Apps The Legislative Branch The Judicial Branch The Constitution Federal Agencies & Commissions Elections & Voting State & Local Government Resources

En español Accessibility Copyright Information Privacy Policy Contact USA.gov Developers Apply for a Job
Before the Second Division,

June 5, 1956

No. 59998.

#### W. X. Huber Co. *v.*United States,

protest 962989-G (Los Angeles).

*464Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that 20 percent of the merchandise consists of rags used chiefly for papermaking, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained with respect to said 20 percent of the merchandise.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001051719
<NAME> UDI
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US$

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          46,034
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   74,867
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    245,422
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               370,035
<PP&E>                                          78,371
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 796,994
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          459,441
<BONDS>                                        182,820
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,315
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   796,994
<SALES>                                        564,143
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               564,143
<CGS>                                          457,164
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  555,005
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,734)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,305
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,723)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,803
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,526)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    680
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,846)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>