alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 64024.

protests 58/10137, 58/10141, and 58/10145 (Detroit).

#### John V. Carr & Son, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of prepared or preserved pork similar in all material respects to that the subject of *C. J. Tower & Sons*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 36, C.D. 2100), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

: CIVIL ACTION

ELLA MAE HAMPTON

:

 v. :

: NO. 02-4348

OCWEN FEDERAL BANK

PRETRIAL ORDER

AND NOW, this 10th day of January,2003, it is ORDERED:

1. All discovery in this case is to be completed by 4/11/03.

2. Pretrial motions or motions for summary judgment are to be

filed within 15 days of the close of discovery.

3. This case will be placed in the trial pool(published in the

Legal Intelligencer) on 5/16/03.

4. Changes in the foregoing schedule may be obtained only by

written application to the Court, for cause shown.

5. Unless otherwise ordered, counsel need not submit a final

pretrial order. However, all exhibits must be marked and

exchanged, and all witness lists exchanged, at least three

working days in advance of trial. No objection to authenticity

of any exhibit will be entertained unless raised before trial.

6. If requested by counsel, the Court will hold a pretrial or

settlement conference at any time; but no such conference will

ordinarily be scheduled in the absence of a request. 

ATTEST: or BY THE COURT

BY: 

 Deputy Clerk CLIFFORD SCOTT GREEN, S.J.

Case 2:02-cv-04348-CG Document 5 Filed 01/10/2003 Page 1 of 1
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1453 

To allow the Secretary of Health and Human Services to designate certain 

substance use disorder treatment facilities as eligible for National Health 

Service Corps service. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 28, 2017 

Mr. DONNELLY (for himself and Ms. MURKOWSKI) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To allow the Secretary of Health and Human Services to 

designate certain substance use disorder treatment facilities as eligible for National Health Service Corps service. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Strengthening the Ad5 diction Treatment Workforce Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. SUBSTANCE USE DISORDER TREATMENT FACILI7 TIES. 

8 Section 332(a)(2) of the Public Health Service Act 

9 (42 U.S.C. 254e(a)(2)) is amended— 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1453 IS

1 (1) in subparagraph (C), by striking ‘‘; and’’ 

2 and inserting a semicolon; 

3 (2) in subparagraph (D), by striking the period 

4 and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

5 (3) by adding at the end the following: 

6 ‘‘(E) a substance use disorder treatment facility 

7 that— 

8 ‘‘(i) provides treatment for substance use 

9 disorders through, at a minimum, outpatient 

10 counseling, medication-assisted treatment using 

11 drugs approved by the Food and Drug Adminis12 tration, other evidence-based ambulatory serv13 ices, or residential treatment services; 

14 ‘‘(ii) provides other evidence-based opioid 

15 addiction treatment and recovery services; 

16 ‘‘(iii) is primarily engaged in serving indi17 viduals living with, or in recovery from, sub18 stance use disorders; and 

19 ‘‘(iv) has any license, certification, or ac20 creditation required by the State.’’. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
Page 1 of 2

IN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE WELLBUTRIN SR/ZYBAN ANTITRUST :

LITIGATION :

_________________________________________ : Master File No. 02-CV-4398

:

THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: :

ALL ACTIONS :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 9th day of January, 2003, this matter having been referred to me,

by the Honorable Bruce W. Kauffman, for the supervision of all discovery matters [See Docket

Entry No. 14], it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The status conference scheduled on February 5, 2003 at 11:00 a.m. will be

held before me in Courtroom 3-H, 3rd Floor, U.S. Courthouse, 601 Market Street, Philadelphia,

PA 19106.

Counsel are to appear and be prepared to discuss the scheduling of discovery and

pretrial dates.

2. Consistent with the proposal in the December 19, 2002 letter, addressed to

Judges Kauffman and Hart, from Counsel for Defendant GlaxoSmithKline, the parties may

submit a proposed pretrial order, faxed to my chambers, on or before January 28, 2003.

BY THE COURT:

 

M. FAITH ANGELL

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:02-cv-04398-BWK Document 15 Filed 01/10/2003 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2

ORDER FAX FORM

If you want your Order faxed,

 please provide names and fax numbers below.

 Thank you.

CASE NO. 02-4398

TODAY’S DATE: January 9, 2003 LAW CLERK’S INITIALS: JJK

NAME FAX NUMBER (Area Code & Number)

1. Anthony J. Bolognese, Esq. 215-814-6764

2. Marc A. Topaz, Esq./Joseph H. Meltzer, Esq. 610-667-7056

3. J. Douglas Richards, Esq./

 Michael M. Buckman, Esq. 212-868-1229

4. Thomas M. Sobol, Esq./

 Jeniene Andrews-Matthews, Esq. 617-482-3003

5. Christopher A. O’Hara, Esq. 206-623-0594

6. Mark S. Stewart, Esq./Leslie E. John, Esq. 215-864-8999

7. William J. Baer, Esq./Kenneth A. Letzler, Esq./

 Cathy Hoffman, Esq./Amy R. Mudge, Esq./

 June Im, Esq. 202-942-5999

Case 2:02-cv-04398-BWK Document 15 Filed 01/10/2003 Page 2 of 2
NUMBER 13-10-00253-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

DAVID WAYNE BAILEY, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 36th District Court

of Aransas County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Rodriguez and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, David Wayne Bailey, by and through his attorney, has filed a motion to 

dismiss his appeal because he no longer desires to prosecute it. See TEX. R. APP. P. 

42.2(a). Without passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion to dismiss 

pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and dismiss the appeal. Having 

dismissed the appeal at appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, 
2

and our mandate will issue forthwith. Any pending motions are dismissed as moot.

PER CURIAM

Do not publish. 

See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). 

Delivered and filed the

18th day of November, 2010.
# C_2018052EN.01004402.xml

| 12.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 52/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 52/44

---

Order of the General Court of 14 December 2017 — Meissen Keramik v EUIPO — Staatliche Porzellan-Manufaktur Meissen (Meissen)

(Case T-234/16) (1)

1

(2018/C 052/59)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 243, 4.7.2016.

1

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 21-0139

_________________

IN THE MATTER OF:

A.S.,

 A Youth in Need of Care.

O R D E R

_________________

M.R. App. P. 10(6) requires that in any proceeding under Title 41, Chapter 3, only 

the initials of the child and parent may be used in all filings. On pages 4 and 32 of 

Appellant’s opening brief, submitted electronically on August 20, 2021, the parent’s and 

child’s names are not redacted. Therefore, this brief does not comply with the rule.

Therefore,

IT IS ORDERED that the referenced brief is rejected. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that within ten (10) days of the date of this Order the 

Appellant shall electronically file with the Clerk of this Court a revised brief containing 

the revisions necessary to comply with the specified Rule and that the Appellant shall 

serve copies of the revised brief on all parties of record;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no changes, additions, or deletions other than 

those specified in this Order may be made to the brief as originally filed; and

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the times for any subsequent briefing contained 

in M. R. App. P. 13 shall run from the date of filing of the revised brief.

The Clerk is directed to provide a true copy of this Order to the Appellant and to 

all parties of record. 

Electronically signed by:

Laurie McKinnon

Justice, Montana Supreme Court

August 23 2021

08/23/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0139
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

TIFFANI T. KALIKO : CIVIL ACTION

:

vs. :

 : NO. 02-cv-2773

INTERSTATE RESOURCES, INC. :

O R D E R

AND NOW, TO WIT: This 13th day of December, 2002,

it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above action has been settled

and upon Order of the Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1(b) of the Local Rules of

Civil Procedure of this Court , it is

ORDERED that the above action is DISMISSED with prejudice, pursuant to

agreement of counsel without costs.

MICHAEL E. KUNZ, Clerk of Court

BY: 

Lynn Meyer 

 Deputy Clerk

cc: Sarah E. Bouchard, Esq. (mail)

Michael J. McCaney, Esq. (fax)

O:\41(b) Orders to Dismiss\Kaliko v. Interstate 02-2773 - 41.1 New.wpd

Case 2:02-cv-02773-MMB Document 10 Filed 12/13/2002 Page 1 of 1
|   | (1) | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |
|--------|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| November                19, 2007 | /s/ Edna                Carter                                                                |
|---------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                  | Edna                Carter, Chief Accounting Officer (Principal                Accounting Officer) |

*This      certification accompanies this Report pursuant to Section 906 of the      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and is not deemed filed by the Company*
*and      is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under      the      Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made      before or after the date of the Report), irrespective of any general      incorporation language contained in such filing*
*.*

----
----

Action brought on 16 June 2006 — Lesniak v Commission

(Case F-67/06)

(2006/C 178/81)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Christophe Lesniak (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: S. Orlandi, A. Coolen, J.-N. Louis and E. Marchal, lawyers)

Defendant: Commission of the European Communities

Form of order sought

Pleas in law and main arguments

As a successful candidate in competition PE/99/A, the notice of which had been published under the former Staff Regulations, the applicant, at the time a member of the temporary staff in Grade A6 (now A*10), was recruited as an official after the entry into force of the new Staff Regulations and classified in Grade A*6.

In addition to raising pleas very similar to those raised in Case F-12/06 (1), the applicant maintains that the Commission should have awarded him the same classification which he enjoyed as a member of the temporary staff in accordance with Article 5(4) of Annex XIII to the Staff Regulations. According to the applicant, that provision should also apply to successful candidates in open competitions.

----

(1)OJ C 86, 8.4.2006, p. 48.

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE: JOEL D. CANEY : MISCELLANEOUS

:

: NO. 02-174

ORDER

AND NOW, this day of 2002, the respondent

having been ordered on July 8, 2002 to show cause within thirty (30) days why she should not be

disbarred from the practice of law in this court, and the respondent not having answered or

requested a hearing, it is hereby

ORDERED that respondent is disbarred from the practice of law in this court, 

pending further action by the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

BY THE COURT:

 

JAMES T. GILES

Chief Judge

Case 2:02-mc-00174-UJ Document 3 Filed 08/21/2002 Page 1 of 1
Order entered February 2 6 , 2020

In t he 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 19

- 00939

- CR

OSCAR VLADIMIR HERNA NDEZ, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from th e Criminal District Court No. 3

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F18

- 24510

- J

O RDER
Before the Court is court reporter Kimberly Xavier’s February 18, 2020

request for additional time to file the reporter’s record . We GRANT the request

and ORDER the reporter’s record filed as of February 25, 2020

. Appellant’s brief is due March 27 , 2020.

/s/ CORY L. CARLYLE JUSTICE
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.2

                          ANNUAL SERVICER'S CERTIFICATE

                         CHASE MANHATTAN BANK USA, N.A.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                       Chase Manhattan Owner Trust 2000-A

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


         The undersigned, a duly authorized representative of Chase Manhattan
Bank USA, N.A. ("Chase USA"), as Servicer pursuant to the Sale and Servicing
Agreement dated as of December 1, 2000 (the "Sale and Servicing Agreement") by
and between Chase USA and Chase Manhattan Auto Owner Trust 2000-A, as issuer
(the "Issuer"), does hereby certify that:

1.   A review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from January
     1, 2001 until December 31, 2001 was conducted under my supervision.

2.   Based on such review, the Servicer has, to the best of my knowledge, fully
     performed in all material respects all its obligations, under the Sale and
     Servicing Agreement throughout such period and no material default in the
     performance of such obligations has occurred or is continuing except as set
     forth in paragraph 3 below.

3.   None.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this certificate
this 25th day of March 2002.


                                                        /s/ Jeffrey S. Browning
                                                        -----------------------
                                                        Jeffrey S. Browning
                                                        Vice President
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MARCHESU MINOR : MISCELLANEOUS

:

v. :

THOMAS J. COSTELLO, et al. : NO. 02-mc-178

ORDER

AND NOW, this day of July, 2002, it appearing that petitioner has filed what

purports to be a petition in this court for Habeas Corpus relief, and

it further appearing that this petition is frivolous on its face, it is hereby

ORDERED that petitioner is granted provisional leave to proceed in forma pauperis for

the purposes of this Order only, and, it is further

ORDERED that this matter is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

 

RONALD L. BUCKWALTER, J.

Case 2:02-mc-00178-RB Document 2 Filed 07/15/2002 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:05-cv-03000-AB Document 63 Filed 11/13/06 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:05-cv-03000-AB Document 63 Filed 11/13/06 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:05-cv-03000-AB Document 63 Filed 11/13/06 Page 3 of 3
March 3, 1948

No. 52210.

Suit 4569.

#### Peat Products Corp. *v.*United States.

C. D. 1033 affirmed November 17, 1947. C. A. D. 375.
No. 56369.

protests 177782-K (B), etc. (New York).

#### Burton Dixie Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 58920.

protest 173264-K (New York).

#### Coty, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

It was stipulated that the net weight of the toilet soap as imported was 9,821 pounds and not 10,370 pounds, the weight used in the liquidation of the entry. Accepting the stipulation as a statement of facts, the collector was directed to reliquidate the entry, assessing tax or duty on 9,821 pounds of soap.
(Reap. Dec. 10342)

Entry Nos. 20469; 16536; 1284.

#### Morris Friedman *v.*United States

(Decided September 27, 1962)

*Stein & Shostalc*for tbe plaintiff.

*Joseph D. Gwilfoyle,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for tbe defendant.

*403RichaRdsoN, Judge:

Counsel for the parties have submitted the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached schedule for decision upon a stipulation, reading as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise covered by the appeals for reappraisement enumerated on the attached schedule A, attached hereto and made a part hereof, consists of marble statuary exported from Italy between June 29, 1957 and March 30, 1958.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the merchandise and the issues in the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the Schedule attached hereto and made a part hereof are the same in all material respects as the merchandise and the issues decided in the case of *Bruce Marble & Granite Works, et al.*v. *United States,*Reap. Dec. 9959, and that the record in said case be incorporated and made a part of the record herein.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that at the time of exportation of the instant merchandise to the United States, the prices at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal market of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for export to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, were the invoiced unit values, less nondutiable charges, and that there were no higher foreign values for such or similar merchandise at the time of exportation.

On tbe agreed facts, I find that as to the merchandise entered for consumption prior to February 27, 1958, export value, as that value is defined in 19 U.S.C.A., section 1402(d) (section 402(d), Tariff Act of 1930), is the proper basis for the determination of the value of said merchandise, and as to the merchandise entered for consumption after February 27, 1958, export value, as that value is defined in 19 U.S.C.A., section 1401a(b) (section 402(b), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by Customs Simplification Act of 1956), is the proper basis for the determination of the value of said merchandise and that the respective invoice unit prices, less nondutiable charges, represent said export values.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE DECEMBER
31, 1995, AQUARION COMPANY FORM 10-K AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1995
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1995
<CASH>                                             635
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    15859
<ALLOWANCES>                                      2916
<INVENTORY>                                       4105
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 35791
<PP&E>                                          432480
<DEPRECIATION>                                  136726
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  413980
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            35200
<BONDS>                                         131991
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              285
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                          6937
<OTHER-SE>                                      114565
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    413980
<SALES>                                         118206
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                118206
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    87031
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   842
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                9260
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  22787
<INCOME-TAX>                                      9901
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              12886
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     12886
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     1.90
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.90
        

</TABLE>
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 19

- 00119

- CV
Texas Municipal League Intergovernmental Risk Pool v. City of Pharr, Texas

On a ppeal from the 92nd District Court of Hidalgo County , Texas Trial Cause No. C

- 2246

- 15

- A

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed . The Court orders the appeal DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion . Costs of the appeal are adjudged against the party incurring same

. We further order this deci sion certified below for observance. August 1, 2019
Before the Second Division,

April 10, 1961

No. 65418.

#### Albert E. Maurer Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 292372-K(I), etc. (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Schmidt Pritchard & Co. et al.*(47 C.C.P.A. 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 220 (Thursday, November 16, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 78751]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-25281]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS EXAMINATION COUNCIL

[Docket No. AS23-19]


Appraisal Subcommittee; Notice of Meeting; Cancellation

AGENCY: Appraisal Subcommittee of the Federal Financial Institutions 
Examination Council.

ACTION: Notice of meeting; cancellation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

    The Open Meeting, which was published in accordance with Section 
1104(b) of Title XI of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and 
Enforcement Act of 1989, as amended, at 88 FR 77320, November 9, 2023 
and scheduled for Wednesday, November 15, 2023 at 10:00 a.m. ET, has 
been cancelled.

James R. Park,
Executive Director.
[FR Doc. 2023-25281 Filed 11-15-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6700-01-P