alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(Reap. Dec. 10341)

Entry Nos. 6838; 12819; 16510.

#### Wheel Craft, Inc. *v.*United States

(Decided September 27, 1962)

Stem *& Shostah*for the plaintiff.

*Joseph D. Chtilfoyle,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

*402Richardson, Judge:

Counsel for the parties have submitted the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached schedule for decision upon a stipulation, reading as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for tbe respective parties hereto, subject to tbe approval of tbe Court, that tbe merchandise covered by tbe appeals for reappraisement enumerated in tbe attached Schedule of Cases, consists of bicycles exported from England.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that tbe bicycle lamps or lights which are incorporated into tbe bicycles are supplied by tbe seller of tbe bicycles and that their value is included within tbe invoice unit values of tbe bicycles.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that at tbe time of exportation of tbe instant merchandise to tbe United States, tbe prices at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in tbe principal market of tbe country from which exported, in tbe usual wholesale quantities and in tbe ordinary course of trade, for export to tbe United States, including tbe cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all costs, charges and expenses incident to placing tbe merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to tbe United States were tbe invoiced unit values, net packed.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that tbe merchandise tbe subject of this stipulation is not included in tbe list of articles designated by tbe Secretary of tbe Treasury in T.D. 54521, as provided for in Sec. 6(a) of tbe Customs Simplification Act of 1956, Public Law 927, 84th Congress, and that said merchandise is subject to appraisement under Sec. 402 of tbe Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by tbe Customs Simplification Act of 1956.

On the agreed facts, I find that export value, as that value is defined in 19 U.S.C.A., section 1401a (b) (section 402(b), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by Customs Simplification Act of 1956), is the proper basis for the determination of the value of said merchandise and that the respective invoice unit prices, net, packed, represent said export values.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
W:\FORMS\

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIGUEL ANGEL DIAZ : CIVIL ACTION

:

 v. :

:

JOHN ASHCROFT, ET AL : NO. 02-4454

 

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 29TH day of JANUARY, 2003, it ordered

that this matter is scheduled for a - STATUS conference on

FEBRUARY 10, 2003 at 9:30AM before the Honorable J. Curtis Joyner

in CHAMBERS - room - 8613.

*If you are unable to attend this meeting and wish to reschedule

or to change the conference to a telephone conference - it is

your (the counsel not available) - responsibility to coordinate

the date and time with all counsel involved and to contact the

the Deputy at - 267-299-7419

ATTEST: or BY THE COURT

BY: ANGELA J. MICKIE 

 Deputy Clerk Judge

Civ 12 (9/83)

Case 2:02-cv-04454-JCJ Document 9 Filed 01/31/2003 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 12**                               Nine Months Ended September 30, Years Ended December 31,  2006 2005 20052004200320022001     Earnings                            Pre-tax income from continuing operations $226,656  $182,920  $260,347  $228,294  $239,238  $89,157  $119,377 Less: Income (loss) from equity investees  6,650   6,297   12,161   8,105   12,563   (3,993)  5,072 Add: Distributed income from equity investees  1,950   331   1,912   564   1,521   2,591   7,730         221,956   176,954   250,098   220,753   228,196   95,741   122,035                              Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends  522,357   411,749   562,900   556,985   570,646   492,093   371,667 Less: Preferred stock dividends not included in pre-taxincome  8,156   —   2,417   —   —   —   — Less: Tax gross up on preferred stock dividends  4,308   —   874   —   —   —   — Less: Loss on redemption of preferred stock  11,385   —   —   —   —   —   — Less: Tax gross up on loss on redemption of preferredstock  6,013   —   —   —   —   —   —       Total Earnings $714,451  $588,703  $809,707  $777,738  $798,842  $587,834  $493,702                                   Combined Fixed Charges                            Interest credited to annuity and universal life contracts $464,203  $367,669  $506,612  $523,231  $538,622  $464,022  $341,575 Interest expense on debt  26,578   23,696   32,173   32,120   30,154   25,487   26,011 Early extinguishment of debt  —   19,082   19,082   —   —   —   — Amortization of debt issuance costs  917   681   878   928   1,137   985   3,155 Estimate of interest within rental expense  797   621   864   706   733   1,599   926 Preferred stock dividends  8,156   —   2,417   —   —   —   — Tax gross up on preferred stock dividends  4,308   —   874   —   —   —   — Loss on redemption of preferred stock  11,385   —   —   —   —   —   — Tax gross up on loss on redemption of preferred stock  6,013   —   —   —   —   —   —      Total Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends $522,357  $411,749  $562,900  $556,985  $570,646  $492,093  $371,667                                   Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and PreferredStock Dividends  1.37   1.43   1.44   1.40   1.40   1.19   1.33
<PAGE>

                                                                     Exhibit 24

                                POWER OF ATTORNEY

                         INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER COMPANY
              Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended
                                December 31, 2001


The  undersigned  directors  of  INDIANA  MICHIGAN  POWER  COMPANY,  an  Indiana
corporation  (the "Company"),  do hereby  constitute and appoint E. LINN DRAPER,
JR.,   ARMANDO   A.  PENA  and   SUSAN   TOMASKY,   and  each  of  them,   their
attorneys-in-fact  and agents,  to execute for them, and in their names,  and in
any and all of their capacities,  the Annual Report of the Company on Form 10-K,
pursuant to Section 13 of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934,  for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2001, and any and all  amendments  thereto,  and to file
the same, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith,
with   the   Securities   and   Exchange   Commission,    granting   unto   said
attorneys-in-fact  and agents,  and each of them, full power and authority to do
and perform  every act and thing  required or necessary to be done,  as fully to
all intents and purposes as the undersigned might or could do in person,  hereby
ratifying and confirming all that said  attorneys-in-fact  and agents, or any of
them, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

     IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the undersigned  have signed these presents this 21st
day of February, 2001.


   /s/ Karl G. Boyd                       /s/ Robert P. Powers


   /s/ E. Linn Draper, Jr.                /s/ John R. Sampson


   /s/ John E. Ehler                      /s/ Thomas V. Shockley, III


   /s/ Henry W. Fayne                     /s/ D. B. Synowiec


   /s/ David L. Lahrman                   /s/ Susan Tomasky


   /s/ Marc E. Lewis                      /s/ J. H. Vipperman


   /s/ Susanne M. Moorman
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Neighborhood Reinvestment Corporation

# TIME AND DATE: 

4:00 p.m., Wednesday, November 29, 2023.

# PLACE: 

1255 Union Street NW, Suite 500, Washington, DC 20002.

# STATUS: 

Part of this meeting will be open to the public. The rest of this meeting will be closed to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Audit Committee Board of Directors meeting.

The Interim General Counsel of the Corporation has certified that in her opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in the Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(2) permit the closure of the following portion(s) of this meeting:
      - Executive (Closed) Session

## Agenda

I. Call to Order

II. Sunshine Act Approval to Meet in Executive (Closed) Session

III. Executive Session: GAO Workplan Update

IV. Executive Session: Chief Audit Executive Report

V. Action Item: Deferred Internal Audit Projects from FY2023 Internal Audit Plan

VI. Action Item: FY2024 Internal Audit Plan and Risk Assessment

VII. Action Item: Removal and Replacement of Conformance Language

VIII. Discussion Item: Network Watchlist Report

IX. Discussion Item: Internal Audit Status Reports

a. Internal Audit Performance Scorecard

b. Implementation of Internal Audit Recommendations

c. Officer's Report

d. Quality Assurance Improvement Policy

*Portions Open to the Public:*                     Everything except the Executive (Closed) Session.                

*Portions Closed to the Public:*                     Executive (Closed) Session.                

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

                        Jenna Sylvester, Paralegal, (202) 568-2560;                         *jsylvester@nw.org.*

Jenna Sylvester,

Paralegal.

[FR Doc. 2023-24975 Filed 11-7-23; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE P
MPD

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0086

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

LUKE STROMMEN,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, and

good cause appearing therefor, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time to 

and including August 31, 2022, within which to prepare, serve, and file its 

response brief.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 22 2022

07/22/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0086
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 140 

To amend the White Mountain Apache Tribe Water Rights Quantification 

Act of 2010 to clarify the use of amounts in the WMAT Settlement Fund. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 12, 2017 

Mr. FLAKE (for himself and Mr. MCCAIN) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the White Mountain Apache Tribe Water Rights 

Quantification Act of 2010 to clarify the use of amounts 

in the WMAT Settlement Fund. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF FUNDS IN WMAT SETTLEMENT FUND 

4 FOR WMAT RURAL WATER SYSTEM. 

5 (a) AUTHORIZATION OF WMAT RURAL WATER SYS6 TEM.—Section 307(a) of the White Mountain Apache 

7 Tribe Water Rights Quantification Act of 2010 (Public 

8 Law 111–291; 124 Stat. 3080) is amended in the matter 

9 preceding paragraph (1) by inserting ‘‘, (b)(2),’’ after 

10 ‘‘subsections (a)’’. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 140 IS

1 (b) FUNDING.—Section 312(b)(2)(C)(i)(III) of the 

2 White Mountain Apache Tribe Water Rights Quantifica3 tion Act of 2010 (Public Law 111–291; 124 Stat. 3093) 

4 is amended by striking the period at the end and inserting 

5 the following: ‘‘, including the planning, design, and con6 struction of the WMAT rural water system, in accordance 

7 with section 307(a).’’. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
Before the Third Division,

November 23, 1955

No. 59485.

protest 247134-K (New York).

#### Technomat *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

An examination of the official papers failing to disclose any reason for disturbing the finding of the collector, which was presumptively correct, the protest was overruled.
No. 67814.

#### Schick X-Ray Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 58/17976-10183, 58/22959-10182, and 59/18126-10959 (Chicago).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of injectors and parts, in chief value of metal, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Schick X-Ray Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(49 Cust. Ct. 38, C.D. 2358), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Customer Service Hotline: 1-800-438-2474

UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

REGION III

1650 Arch Street

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-2029

December 6, 2011

Mr. David Paylor, Director

Virginia Department of Environmental Quality

629 East Main Street

P.O. Box 1105

Richmond, VA 23218

Dear Mr. Paylor:

 On September 29, 2011, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a 

revision to the Virginia State Implementation Plan (SIP) from the Virginia Department of 

Environmental Quality (VADEQ). The SIP revision consists of upgrading the 2009 and 2015 

motor vehicle emissions budgets for nitrogen oxides using EPA’s motor vehicle emission factor 

model (MOVES2010a) in order to ensure that the Fredericksburg region can properly 

demonstrate transportation conformity. EPA has determined that the submittal is 

administratively and technically complete and is reviewing it to prepare a Notice of Proposed 

Rulemaking. 

 If members of your staff have any questions, they may direct them to Mr. Gregory Becoat, 

at (215) 814-2036, the principal contact for this rulemaking. 

Sincerely,

 /s/

 Diana Esher, Director

 Air Protection Division 

cc: Mr. Michael G. Dowd, Air Quality Division Director, 

 VADEQ
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                                                     EXHIBIT 12


                                            MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED CAPITAL TRUST IV
                                            MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING IV, L.P.
                                              COMPUTATION OF RATIOS OF EARNINGS TO
                         COMBINED FIXED CHARGES AND PREFERRED SECURITIES DISTRIBUTIONS (UNAUDITED)
                                                     (dollars in thousands)



                               FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED           FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                     March 30, 2007                      March 31, 2006
                           ---------------------------------  ---------------------------------
                              MERRILL LYNCH    MERRILL LYNCH     MERRILL LYNCH    MERRILL LYNCH
                                 PREFERRED       PREFERRED          PREFERRED       PREFERRED
                           CAPITAL TRUST IV  FUNDING IV,L.P.  CAPITAL TRUST IV  FUNDING IV,L.P.
                           ----------------- ---------------  ----------------- ---------------

<S>                        <C>                 <C>            <C>               <C>

Earnings                       $  7,340           $  8,611      $    7,340          $   8,600
                               ========           ========        ========           ========


Fixed charges                  $      -           $      -        $      -           $      -

Preferred securities
 distribution
 requirements                     7,120              7,340           7,120              7,340
                               --------           --------        --------           --------

Total combined fixed
 charges and preferred
 securities distribution
 requirements                  $  7,120           $  7,340           7,120           $  7,340
                               ========           ========        ========           ========

Ratio of earnings to
 combined fixed charges
 and preferred securities
 distribution requirements         1.03               1.17            1.03               1.17


</TABLE>
No. 50891.

#### Protests 84077-K, etc., of L. J. Alexander et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
(1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Partnership.
 MERRILL LYNCH PREFERRED FUNDING IV, L.P.
By: MERRILL LYNCH & CO., INC., as General PartnerBy:
    /s/ THOMAS W. PERRYName:
    Thomas W. Perry*Title:
    Chief Accounting Officer and Controller,
Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.  
 *
    
    Thomas W. Perry functions as the equivalent of the Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer of the Partnership for purposes of Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Impurity and CAS Registry Number

(a)

Maximum

percent

(b)

Confidential

CBI CBI

CBI CBI

CBI

CBI

CBI

CBI CBI

CBI CBI

CBI CBI

CBI CBI

CBI CBI

CBI CBI

CBI

TS-F444LK Attachment 4

 Page 1/1
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1269 

To require the Office of Pipeline Safety to consult with the Environmental 

Protection Agency or the Coast Guard in the event the Federal onscene coordinator has concerns about the ability of a pipeline operator 

to respond to a worst case discharge. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 25, 2017 

Ms. STABENOW (for herself and Mr. PETERS) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 

Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To require the Office of Pipeline Safety to consult with 

the Environmental Protection Agency or the Coast Guard 

in the event the Federal on-scene coordinator has concerns about the ability of a pipeline operator to respond 

to a worst case discharge. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pipeline Safety Act 

5 of 2017’’. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1269 IS

1 SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT FOR OFFICE OF PIPELINE SAFETY 

2 TO CONSULT WITH ENVIRONMENTAL PRO3 TECTION AGENCY OR COAST GUARD IN THE 

4 EVENT OF CONCERNS ABOUT ABILITY TO RE5 SPOND TO WORST CASE DISCHARGES. 

6 Not later than 180 days after the date of the enact7 ment of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation shall 

8 amend section 119(d) of part 194 of title 49, Code of Fed9 eral Regulations (or any similar successor regulation) to 

10 require that the Office of Pipeline Safety shall consult 

11 with the Environmental Protection Agency or the Coast 

12 Guard in the event the Federal on-scene coordinator has 

13 concerns about the ability of a pipeline operator to respond 

14 to a worst case discharge. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
# C_2018427EN.01004502.xml

| 26.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 427/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 427/45

---

Judgment of the General Court of 26 September 2018 — France v Commission

(Case T-682/16) (1)

(EAGF - Area-linked aid - Procedure for the suspension of monthly payments to a Member State - Article 41(2)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1306/2013 - Key components of the national control system - Deficiencies found - Action plan including clear progress indicators established in consultation with the Commission - Proportionality)

(2018/C 427/57)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: French Republic (represented by: F. Alabrune, D. Colas, D. Segoin, A.-L. Desjonquères and S. Horrenberger, acting as Agents)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: X. Lewis and D. Triantafyllou, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Portuguese Republic (represented by: L. Inez Fernandes, M. Figueiredo, P. Estêvão and J. Saraiva de Almeida, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application on the basis of Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Commission Implementing Decision C(2016) 4287 final of 12 July 2016 suspending monthly payments to the French Republic under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the French Republic to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the French Republic to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;

| 3. | Orders the Portuguese Republic to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Portuguese Republic to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 441, 28.11.2016.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from Hyde
Athletic Industries, Inc. 10-K Report for the year ended January 3, 1997 and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such 10-K.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   YEAR
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-03-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JAN-03-1997
<CASH>                                       2,802,864
<SECURITIES>                                   236,128
<RECEIVABLES>                               22,840,161
<ALLOWANCES>                                   576,312
<INVENTORY>                                 28,632,511
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            57,815,101
<PP&E>                                      16,737,085
<DEPRECIATION>                               7,519,617
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              71,591,726
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,208,783
<BONDS>                                      4,885,342
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                     2,145,095
<OTHER-SE>                                  47,933,522
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                71,591,726
<SALES>                                    110,809,169
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                           111,884,834
<CGS>                                       77,449,171
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               77,449,171
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            31,254,370
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               536,106
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             951,737
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,229,556
<INCOME-TAX>                                   427,468
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,494,090
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,494,090
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.24
        

</TABLE>