alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ORBREE and E. C. MORRIS DIXON :

: CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-CV-4325

Plaintiffs, :

:

v. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION;

BAYER AG;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE;

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM

:

:

:

:

:

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

:

Defendants. :

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of the Court:

Kindly enter the appearances of Hope S. Freiwald, Aline Fairweather, Erin

Brennan and Kirstin J. Miller as attorneys for defendant SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a

GlaxoSmithKline.

Respectfully Submitted,

_____________________________ _____________________________

Hope S. Freiwald Aline Fairweather

_____________________________ _____________________________

Erin Brennan Kirstin J. Miller

DECHERT PRICE & RHOADS

4000 Bell Atlantic Tower

1717 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2793

(215) 994-4000

Case 2:02-cv-04325-CG Document 9 Filed 09/20/2002 Page 1 of 1
No. 64790.

#### Hybern, Inc., dba The Akron *v.*United States,

protest 59/14732 (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of Christmas trees which are manufactures of wood, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
### -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

36 38 40 

## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 08/02 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 02 Aug 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.81 N 76.74 WMeters AGL 

## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■



## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★ ● ● ● ●



## ★ ● ● ● ●
115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1052 

AN ACT 

To strengthen the use of patient-experience data within the 

benefit-risk framework for approval of new drugs. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 1052 ES

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Better Empowerment 

3 Now to Enhance Framework and Improve Treatments Act 

4 of 2017’’ or the ‘‘BENEFIT Act of 2017’’. 

5 SEC. 2. STRENGTHENING THE USE PATIENT-EXPERIENCE 

6 DATA WITHIN BENEFIT-RISK FRAMEWORK. 

7 Section 569C of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cos8 metic Act (21 U.S.C. 360bbb–8c) is amended— 

9 (1) in subsection (a)(1)— 

10 (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘; 

11 and’’ and inserting a semicolon; 

12 (B) in subparagraph (B), by striking the 

13 period and inserting ‘‘; and’’; and 

14 (C) by adding at the end the following: 

15 ‘‘(C) as part of the risk-benefit assessment 

16 framework in the new drug approval process de17 scribed in section 505(d), considering relevant 

18 patient-focused drug development data, such as 

19 data from patient preference studies (benefit20 risk), patient reported outcome data, or patient 

21 experience data, developed by the sponsor of an 

22 application or another party.’’; and 

23 (2) in subsection (b)(1). by inserting ‘‘, includ24 ing a description of how such data and information 
3 

†S 1052 ES

1 were considered in the risk benefit assessment de2 scribed in section 505(d)’’ before the period. 

Passed the Senate August 3, 2017. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 
115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1052 

AN ACT 

To strengthen the use of patient-experience data 

new drugs. within the benefit-risk framework for approval of
Exhibit 10.11


 


March 16, 2016


 


Matt Dyer


 


Dear Matt:


 


As we have discussed, effective March 16,
2016, you will transition from a 4Catalyzer employee to a Quantum-Si employee. Your position will continue as Head of Informatics
and Cloud Strategy at an annual base salary of $145,000, paid in twice monthly pay periods, less required deductions.


 


You are expected to devote 100% of your
working time to Quantum-Si, and any outside work must be approved in writing by Quantum-Si. Any such approval may be granted or
withheld in Quantum-Si’s discretion.


 


You will be eligible to participate in
medical and other benefit plans in accordance with the rules and eligibility of those plans currently in effect. Further, while
we expect you to remain with Quantum-Si for a long time, this letter is not an employment contract and you will be an at-will employee.


 


Quantum-Si considers the protection of
its confidential information, proprietary materials and goodwill to be extremely important. Consequently, as a condition of this
offer of employment, you will be required to sign Quantum-Si's Confidentiality and Intellectual Property Agreement.


 


	 	Sincerely,
	 	 
	 	Quantum-Si Incorporated
	 	 
	 	By:	 /s/
    Elizabeth A. Whayland
	 	Name:   Elizabeth A. Whayland
	 	Title:     Secretary



 


	ACCEPTED AND AGREED:	 
	 	 
	 	 
	Signature:	 /s/ Matt Dyer	 
	Name:	Matt Dyer
STANL EY SL OAN,

Plaintiff,
v. MI CHAEL

J . ASTRUE, Commi ssioner, Social Security

Administration De fe nd ant. UNITED STAT ES DIS TRICT COURT

F OR THE D ISTRIC T OF CO LU M BIA

Civil Action No. 09-482 ( CKK)

M EM OR

AN DU M OP IN ION (Nove mber 30, 2009) Plaintiff, Stanley

Sloan, filed the above -ca ptioned matter on Mar ch 12, 2009, see king judicial revie w of a

final dec ision by

the Def endant, Micha el J . Astrue, Commissioner of the Social Security

Administration, denying Plaintiff’ s claim for D isability I nsuranc e B enef

its and Supplemental Security

I ncome unde r Titles I Iand XVI of the Social Sec urity

Act, 42 U.S.C. § 401 et seq . There afte r, on Oc tober 30, 2009, Plaintiff moved the Court for a judg ment of re versa l ag ainst the Def

endant or , in the alternative, for r emand to the Social Sec urity Administration for
a new administrative hea

ring
. SeePl.’s Mot. for J . of Rever sal, Docke t No. [14] . On Novembe r 27, 2009, Def

endant r esponded by

filing a consent motion reque sting that the Court e nter judgme nt reve rsing the Def endant’ s final dec ision and remandingthe ca se for further administrative proc eeding s, pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g ). SeeDef .’s Motion for Entry

of J udg ment with Remand Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g ), Doc ket No. [15]
. Def endant r epre sents that Plaintiff’s counsel ha s consented to the D efe ndant’s motion for
rema nd. Id. at 2.-2-

Upon consider ation of the De fenda nt’s motion, the posit ions of the par ties as stated there in, the rele vant ca se law a nd statutory

provisions, and the re cord of this case a s a whole, the Court sh a ll G RA

NT De fe nd ant’ s [15 ] Mot ion fo r E ntr y of Judg me nt w ithRe mand

Pur su ant t o Sentence Four

of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g ). Ac cording ly , the Def endant’ s final dec ision is reverse d, and this case is remande d to the Def endant f or fur ther proc eeding s pursuant to sentenc e four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) . Finally , g iven the Court’s dec ision above g rantingDef endant’ s consent motion to remand, the Court shall DENY a s MOOT Plaintiff’s [14] Motion for J udg ment of Reversa l. An appropr iate Or der a ccompa nies this Memorandum Opinion.

Date: Nove mber 30, 2009 / s / CO LLEEN K OLLA R- K OTEL LY Un i t edS t at es Di s t ri ct J u d ge
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED ACCOUNTING FIRM

To
the Board of Directors and Stockholders
INTAC International, Inc.

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 File No. 333-116871 and the Registration Statement on Form S-8 File No. 333-115147 of
INTAC International, Inc. and in the related Prospectuses of our report dated February 18, 2005 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of INTAC International, Inc. (and
subsidiaries), management's assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of INTAC International,
Inc. (and subsidiaries), included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003.

/s/
KBA Group LLP

Dallas,
Texas
March 16, 2005

---



QuickLinks
No. 62484.

#### The L. Buchman Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 312770-K (New York).

*419Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

For purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned, Melinda S. Urion, Executive
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of AmerUs Group Co. (the
Company), hereby certifies that:



| | (i)  |  | the Quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter
ended September 30, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Commission Act of 1934; and
| | ---- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (ii) |  | the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.                                                                                                                                                   

|                                      | 
|------------------------------------- | 
|/s/ Melinda S. Urion                  | 
|                                      | 
|Melinda S. Urion                      | 
|Executive Vice President,             | 
|Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer | 
|AmerUs Group Co.                      | 

Dated: November 7, 2003

50
# C_2016326EN.01001602.xml

| 5.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/16

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from Supreme Court of the United Kingdom (United Kingdom) made on 22 June 2016 — MP v Secretary of State for the Home Department

(Case C-353/16)

(2016/C 326/28)

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Referring court

Supreme Court of the United Kingdom

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: MP

Applicant:

Defendant: Secretary of State for the Home Department

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Does article 2(e), read with article 15(b), of EU Council Directive 2004/83/EC (1) cover a real risk of serious harm to the physical or psychological health of the applicant if returned to the country of origin, resulting from previous torture or inhuman or degrading treatment for which the country of origin was responsible?

1

---

(1)  Council Directive 2004/83/EC of 29 April 2004 on minimum standards for the qualification and status of third country nationals or stateless persons as refugees or as persons who otherwise need international protection and the content of the protection granted

1

OJ L 304, p. 12

---
----

| 1. | The Bank is Servicer under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement. |
|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The undersigned is duly authorized as required pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing Agreement and the Supplement to execute and deliver this Certificate to the Trustee. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3. | This Certificate is delivered pursuant to Section 3.05 of the Pooling and Servicing Agreement and Section 20 of the Supplement. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 4. | During the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2016 (the “Reporting Period”) a review of the Servicer’s activities and of its performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, the Supplement and the Indenture has been made under my supervision. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 5. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its obligations under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement, the Supplement and the Indenture in all material respects throughout the Reporting Period. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| By:    | /s/ Joseph L. Lombardi |                    |
|--------|------------------------|--------------------|
|   | Name:                  | Joseph L. Lombardi |   |
|   | Title:                 | Vice President     |   |

----
No. 51329.

#### Protests 111001-K, etc., of Geo. S. Bush & Co., Inc., et al. (Portland, Oreg., and Seattle).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The protests were dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 219 (Wednesday, November 15, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 78398]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-25237]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


International Product Change--Priority Mail Express 
International, Priority Mail International & First-Class Package 
International Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a Priority Mail Express 
International, Priority Mail International & First-Class Package 
International Service contract to the list of Negotiated Service 
Agreements in the Competitive Product List in the Mail Classification 
Schedule.

DATES: Date of notice: November 15, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher C. Meyerson, (202) 268-
7820.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 7, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express International, Priority Mail 
International & First-Class Package International Service Contract 30 
to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, 
Docket Nos. MC2024-43 and CP2024-43.

Colleen Hibbert-Kapler,
Attorney, Ethics and Legal Compliance.
[FR Doc. 2023-25237 Filed 11-14-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
October 23, 2014

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

DELLA GOINES, Appellant

NO. 14-14-00627-CV V.

SRMOF 2009-I TRUST, BY WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL 

ASSOCIATION NOT IN ITS INDIVIDUAL OR BANKING CAPACITY BUT 

SOLEY AS CERTIFICATE TRUSTEE OF THE TRUST, Appellees

________________________________

Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the 

judgment signed by the court below on July 23, 2014. Having considered the 

motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by 

appellant, Della Goines.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
DO NOT PAY BEST PRACTICES FORUM

HOW ANALYTICS CAN TELL THE STORY OF

YOUR PAYMENT INTEGRITY JOURNEY

Tuesday, July 21, 2020

2:00 p.m. — 4:00 p.m.

Agenda

Time Topic Presenters

2:00 – 1:05 Open Window for Attendees to Join

2:05 – 2:10 Welcome and Introductions Dominique McCreary

2:10 – 2:40 • Why Analytics?

• What’s the Benefits?

Brian Hewitt 

DNP Analytics Advisor

2:40– 3:00 How Do I get Started? Shannon Alkhalaf

3:00 – 4:00 Using Data to Tell the Story

– the Interviews

Angélique Bridges

Moderator

Department of Labor 

Eric Sanders 

Chief of Fiscal Operations for the 

Federal Employees’ Compensation Act

Office of Inspector General 

Department of Housing and Urban 

Development 

Douglas Gibson

Senior Auditor

Oregon Secretary of State

Audits Division

Ian Green, M.Econ, CGAP, CFE, CISA

Audit Manager – Data Analytics
# C_2016175EN.01000901.xml

| 17.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 175/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 175/9

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Cluj (Romania) lodged on 19 February 2016 — SC Paper Consult SRL v Direcția Regională a Finanțelor Publice Cluj-Napoca, Administrația Județeană a Finanțelor Publice Bistrița-Năsăud

(Case C-101/16)

(2016/C 175/09)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Referring court

Curtea de Apel Cluj

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: SC Paper Consult SRL

Appellant:

Respondents: Direcția Regională a Finanțelor Publice Cluj-Napoca, Administrația Județeană a Finanțelor Publice Bistrița-Năsăud

Respondents:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Does Directive 2006/112/EC (1) preclude national rules under which a taxable person is denied the right to deduct VAT on the grounds that the person upstream, which issued the invoice in which the expenditure and VAT are indicated, has been declared inactive by the tax authorities? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Does Directive 2006/112/EC (1) preclude national rules under which a taxable person is denied the right to deduct VAT on the grounds that the person upstream, which issued the invoice in which the expenditure and VAT are indicated, has been declared inactive by the tax authorities?

1

| 2. | If the answer to the first question is in the negative, does Directive 2006/112/EC preclude national rules under which it is sufficient to display the list of registered inactive taxpayers at the headquarters of the Agenției Națională de Administrare Fiscală (National Agency for Fiscal Administration) and to publish that list on the website of that agency, in the section Public information — Information relating to economic operators, in order that the right to deduct VAT in the circumstances described in the first question may be refused? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If the answer to the first question is in the negative, does Directive 2006/112/EC preclude national rules under which it is sufficient to display the list of registered inactive taxpayers at the headquarters of the Agenției Națională de Administrare Fiscală (National Agency for Fiscal Administration) and to publish that list on the website of that agency, in the section Public information — Information relating to economic operators, in order that the right to deduct VAT in the circumstances described in the first question may be refused?

---

(1)  Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1).

1

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 19-6987

VICTOR LIVERMON,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

HAROLD W. CLARKE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at 

Richmond. M. Hannah Lauck, District Judge. (3:19-cv-00324-MHL-RCY)

Submitted: November 19, 2019 Decided: November 22, 2019

Before WILKINSON and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit 

Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Victor Livermon, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Victor Livermon seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing without 

prejudice his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition for failure to pay the filing fee. The order 

is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a 

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). 

When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the 

constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); 

see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court denies 

relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial 

of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Livermon has not 

made the requisite showing. Moreover, Livermon has since paid the filing fee and the 

district court docketed Livermon’s 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition as a new civil action. See 

Livermon v. Clarke, No. 3:19-cv-00487-MHL-RCY. Accordingly, Livermon has received 

the relief he seeks on appeal. We therefore deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave 

to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal as moot. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Case 2:05-cr-00044-GEKP Document 1167 Filed 11/04/22 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Virage Logic Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2010 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Alexander Shubat, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to
§ 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officers knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the dates presented.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/    Alexander Shubat              
|Dr. Alexander Shubat                 
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|August 9, 2010