alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

 

 

FELIX D. WHITTINGTON,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

DONALD VAUGHN, et al.,

 Defendants.

 CIVIL ACTION

 NO. 02-4346

ORDER FOR SPECIAL REPORT

To: Warden

SCI-Graterford 

Box 244

Graterford, PA 19426

This pro se plaintiff has repeatedly written the court various complaints regarding his

incarceration at this institution. See the court’s Orders dated:

July 15, 2002

July 26, 2002

July 31, 2002

September 3, 2002

September 3, 2002

September 3, 2002

September 3, 2002

September 3, 2002

September 5, 2002

September 10, 2002

September 10, 2002

September 18, 2002

September 23, 2002

September 30, 2002

October 1, 2002

October 2, 2002

October 8, 2002

October 8, 2002

October 15, 2002

October 24, 2002

October 24, 200

October 29, 2002

October 30, 2002

November 1, 2002

November 6, 2002

November 14, 2002

and the attached letters which are forwarded with a copy of this Order.

In order to ascertain the status of this matter, the court ORDERS a special report

from the warden of this institution which shall contain a description of plaintiff’s custody status,

classification, medical and psychiatric status and disciplinary history.

Case 2:02-cv-04346-MK Document 53 Filed 11/18/2002 Page 1 of 2
2

The said special report shall be filed with the court within thirty (30) days.

Dated: November 18, 2002 BY THE COURT:

_______________________________________

MARVIN KATZ, S.J.

Case 2:02-cv-04346-MK Document 53 Filed 11/18/2002 Page 2 of 2
Searched for **https://www.ssa.gov/pubs/ES-05-10929.pdf**

 

19961997199819992000200120022003200420052006200720082009201020112012201320142015201620172018201920202021202220232024

*Note:* This calendar view maps the number of captures of **https://www.ssa.gov/pubs/ES-05-10929.pdf**, *not* how many times the site was actually updated.

Look Up URL in general Internet Archive web collection.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002


The certification set forth below is being
submitted in connection with the Quarterly Report of CSK Auto
Corporation on Form 10-Q for the period ending
October 31, 2004 (the Report) for the purpose
of complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d -14(b) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange
Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of
Title 18 of the United States Code.

Maynard L. Jenkins, the Chief Executive Officer
and Don W. Watson, the Chief Financial Officer of CSK Auto
Corporation, each certifies that to the best of their knowledge:



| |                                                                                                                                                                         
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) The Report fully complies with the
    requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
    Exchange Act of 1934; and                                       
|
| | (2) The information contained in the Report
    fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
    condition and result of operations of CSK Auto Corporation.



| |                       
| | ----------------------
| | /s/ MAYNARD L. JENKINS
| |                       



| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | Maynard L. Jenkins     
| | Chief Executive Officer

December 9, 2004



| |                  
| | -----------------
| | /s/ DON W. WATSON
| |                  



| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | Don W. Watson          
| | Chief Financial Officer

December 9, 2004
# C_2017195EN.01000402.xml

| 19.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 195/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 195/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 26 April 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Noord-Holland — Netherlands) — Stryker EMEA Supply Chain Services BV v Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Douane kantoor Rotterdam Rijnmond

(Case C-51/16) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Common Customs Tariff - Tariff headings - Classification of goods - Implant screws intended to be inserted in the human body for the treatment of fractures or the stabilisation of prostheses - Combined Nomenclature - Heading 9021 - Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1212/2014 - Validity))

(2017/C 195/05)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Rechtbank Noord-Holland

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Stryker EMEA Supply Chain Services BV

Applicant:

Defendant: Inspecteur van de Belastingdienst/Douane kantoor Rotterdam Rijnmond

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Heading 9021 of the Combined Nomenclature of the Common Customs Tariff in Annex I to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2658/87 of 23 July 1987 on the tariff and statistical nomenclature and on the Common Customs Tariff, as amended by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1101/2014 of 16 October 2014, must be interpreted as meaning that medical implant screws such as those at issue in the main proceedings fall under that heading as those goods have characteristics which distinguish them from ordinary goods by the finish of their manufacture and their high degree of precision, as well as by their method of manufacture and the specificity of their purpose. In particular, the fact that medical implant screws such as those at issue in the main proceedings can be inserted in the body only by means of specific medical tools, not by means of ordinary tools, is a characteristic to be taken into consideration in order to distinguish those medical implant screws from ordinary products.

---

(1)  OJ C 136, 18.4.2016.

1

---
No. 53967.

#### Globe Sanitary Rag Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 793507-G, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

The protests were dismissed.
Process Flow Diagram - Use of DP-111 Process flow diagram - CBI
No. 53474.

protests 137893-K, etc. (New York).

#### Maywood Chemical Works *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of cocoa residue or cocoa expeller cake similar in all material respects to the cocoa residue the subject of *Maywood Chemical Works et al.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 87, C. D. 1165), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                          14,371
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,998
<ALLOWANCES>                                       550
<INVENTORY>                                     22,890
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                53,297
<PP&E>                                          34,128
<DEPRECIATION>                                   6,598
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  80,827
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,035
<BONDS>                                         15,876
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            16
<OTHER-SE>                                      53,900
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    80,827
<SALES>                                         11,885
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                12,302
<CGS>                                            7,238
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,472
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,972
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 270
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  3,378
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,284
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,094
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,094
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.13
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.12
        

</TABLE>
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 16** 

**- 2302** 

In re: GREGORY GREEN

,

Petitioner

.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus . ( 0:16

- cv

- 00846

- RBH )

Submitted : January 31, 2017 Decided: February 2, 2017

Before WILKINSON, KEENAN, and THACKER , Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.

Gregory Green , Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:

Gregory Green petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging that

the district court has unduly delayed in ruling on his 28 U.S.C.

§ 2254 (2012) petition . He seeks an order from this court

directing the district court to act. We conclude that the present

record does not r eveal undue delay in the district court.

Accordingly, we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and deny

the mandamus petition. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before th is court and argument would n ot aid the

decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**AMERICAN
      TECHNOLOGIES GROUP, INC.**




**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**





**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of American Technologies Group, Inc. (the
      Company) on Form 10-QSB for the period ended April 30, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas E. Durkin, III, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:




(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      American Technologies Group, Inc. and will be retained by American Technologies
      Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
      staff
      upon request.




Date:
            August 10, 2007By:
            /s/ Thomas E. Durkin, IIIThomas E. Durkin, III
                *PRESIDENT*
No. 57632.

#### Mawer-Gulden-Annis, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 207185-K and 207186-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

From an examination of thefpapers in this case, the court was unable to find anything to overcome the presumption of correctness of the collector’s classification. The protests were therefore overruled.
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2012-0186

Directorate Identifier: 2011NM268AD

737-30A1063 --- 11/16/11

BAE 233A3201-30-0222 --- 10/28/10

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
# C_2017121EN.01003202.xml

| 18.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 121/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 121/32

---

Order of the General Court of 16 February 2017 — Walton v Commission

(Case T-594/16) (1)

1

((Action for annulment - Civil service - Temporary agents - Severance grant - Revision of the calculation - Res judicata - Action in part inadmissible and in part manifestly lacking any foundation in law))

(2017/C 121/47)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Robert Walton (Oxford, United Kingdom) (represented by: F. Moyse, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A.-C. Simon and F. Simonetti, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 270 TFEU, seeking the annulment of the decision of the authority empowered to conclude contracts of employment notified by the Commission’s letter of 15 March 2016 rejecting as inadmissible the applicant’s request for revision of the calculation of the severance grant following his resignation.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | Robert Walton is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Robert Walton is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 251, 11.7.2016 (Case initially registered before the European Union Civil Service Tribunal under number F-24/16 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1.9.2016).

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<CIK>                         0001051719
<NAME>                        UDI
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                                 JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                         15,608
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  81,140
<ALLOWANCES>                                   0
<INVENTORY>                                    256,913
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               358,167
<PP&E>                                         99,628
<DEPRECIATION>                                 0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 884,253
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          437,660
<BONDS>                                        200,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     18,712
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   884,253
<SALES>                                        596,160
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               596,160
<CGS>                                          494,656
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  579,334
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (722)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             21,046
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,858)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   1,250
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,108)
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (4,108)
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0


</TABLE>
Exhibit
      32.1


CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual report of Pacificap Entertainment Holdings, Inc.
      (the
“Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Mark Schaftlein, Principal Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Pacificap Entertainment Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Pacificap
      Entertainment Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.





Date:
                April 18, 2007
            
            By:
            */s/
                Mark Schaftlein*Mark
                SchaftleinPrincipal
                Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
Case Wo. 7,803.

#### KING et al. v. SHAW.

[4 Cranch, C. C. 457.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

March Term, 1834.

Pkactice — Pleading at Retukn Term.

In cases under the lien law, the court will not. oblige the defendant to plead at the return term.

C. Cox, for plaintiffs [King and Pickerell],

stated that it was a case under the lien law of March 2d, 1833, and moved the court for a rule on the defendant [W. P. Shaw] to plead at this term, because the lien could continue only two years from the commencement of the building, and if the plaintiffs should not get judgment within the two years they would lose the lien.

1

 [Reported by Hon. William Cranch, Chief Judge.]

But

THE COURT

(nem. con.) refused to grant the rule.
**EXHIBIT 99.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Badger StateEthanol, LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31,2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof,(the “Report”), I, John L. Malchine, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

2.                                       The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultof operations of the Company.

 

 
| March 27, 2003 |                    |
|----------------|-------------------------|
|           |                    |
|           | /s/ John L. Malchine    |   |
|           | John L. Malchine        |
|           | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
# C_2016296EN.01004701.xml

| 16.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 296/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 296/47

---

Action brought on 22 June 2016 — ZZ v CEDEFOP

(Case F-31/16)

(2016/C 296/59)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: S. Pappas, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (CEDEFOP)

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the appointing authority’s decision not to include the applicant on the list of officials promoted under the 2015 annual promotion procedure at the European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training (CEDEFOP) and an application for damages in respect of the non-material and material harm allegedly suffered.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:

| — | annul the appointing authority’s decision of non-promotion dated 4 November 2015 in so far as it concerns the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the appointing authority’s decision of non-promotion dated 4 November 2015 in so far as it concerns the applicant;

| — | order the CEDEFOP agency to pay compensation in respect of the harm suffered; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the CEDEFOP agency to pay compensation in respect of the harm suffered;

| — | order CEDEFOP to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order CEDEFOP to pay the costs.

---
Order entered August 20, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-19-00815-CV

IN RE DAVID JOACHIM, Relator

Original Proceeding from the 160th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-14-13421

ORDER

Before the Court is relator’s August 16, 2019 suggestion of bankruptcy showing relator 

filed a proceeding under Chapter 7 of the United States Bankruptcy Code on August 14, 2019 in 

the United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of Texas, under case no. 19-34546. 

Appellant’s bankruptcy filing automatically suspends further action in this appeal. See 

TEX. R. APP. P. 8.2. Accordingly, we ABATE this appeal. It may be reinstated on prompt motion 

by any party complying with Rule 8.3 and specifying what further action, if any, is required from 

the Court. See TEX. R. APP. P. 8.3.

/s/ CORY L. CARLYLE 

JUSTICE
No. 56351.

protests 175745-K, etc. (New York).

#### H. Bendel, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

The protests were dismissed.
### SAT Report PMN Number: P-13-0077 SAT Date: 11/9/2012 Print Date: 2/4/2013

Related cases : Health related cases : Ecotox related cases:

Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 2 3

Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments 1 11

Exposure Based Review : Health: N o Ecotox: Yes
Routes of exposure : Health: Dermal Inhalation Ecotox: All releases to water Fate: ; Keywords : Keywords: IRR-E,S,L,MM, LUNG, UNCERT-SENS, AQUATOX-A,C
Summary of Assessment :

Fate : Fate Summary: P-13-0063-77 FATE: Estimations for typical Liquid with MP < 25 C (E) log Kow = 3.30 (E) S = Dispersible / 73.2 mg/L at 25 C (ICB / E) VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E) BP > 400 C (E) H < 1.00E-8 (E) log Koc = 5.66 (E) log Fish BCF = 1.85 (E)log Fish BAF = 1.79 (E) POTW removal (%) = 90 via sorption Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk-mo Sorption to soils/sediments = v.strong PBT Potential: P1B1 *CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl

Health : Health Summary: Absorption is poor through the skin, moderate through the GI tract, and good through the lungs based on analogs. The PMN material is expected to be a strong irritant to all exposed tissues based on the amines and the surfactant properties of the material. There is also concern for lung effects if respirable particles are inhaled based on cationic binding to lung tissues and/or interference with the natural surfactant balance in the lungs. There is uncertain concern for sensitization for the moieties. Moderate concern.

Ecotox :
Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 3.1 aliphatic amine SAR daphnid 48-h LC50 0.47 aliphatic amine SAR green algal 96-h EC50 0.18 amide SAR fish

_ chronic value 0.023 amide SAR daphnid

_ chronic value 0.050 aliphatic amine SAR

algal

_ chronic value 0.074 aliphatic amine SAR

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge

_ Chronic Value _

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for aliphatic amines and amides; SAR chemical class = aliphatic amine, amide; liquid; log Kow = 4.21 (EPI); S = dispersible in water at 25 C (P); p H7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness < 150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments Assessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern ( p pb) 2 amide SAR

SARs aliphatic amines and amides SAR Class aliphatic amine, amide Ecotox Category N oneEcotox Factors Comments:

SAT Chair: Becky Jones