alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1


CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Kevin S. Kim, certify that:





|   |                                                                          
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | I have reviewed this periodic report on Form 10-K/A of Hope Bancorp, Inc.




|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;










|                   |                 
|------------------ | ----------------
|Dated: May 4, 2018 | /s/ Kevin S. Kim

_______________________________


Kevin S. Kim


President and Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.1

# CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, J. Stephen Barley,
President, Secretary and Treasurer of Tuscany Minerals, Ltd., hereby certifies, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

|(1) | the annual report on Form 10-KSB of Tuscany Minerals, Ltd. for the year ended
          December 31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements
          of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
          respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Tuscany Minerals,
          Ltd.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: March 30, 2005

/s/ J. Stephen BarleyJ. Stephen
BarleyPresident,
Secretary and Treasurer(Principal Executive
Officer and Principal Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or
otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version
of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Tuscany Minerals,
Ltd. and will be retained by Tuscany Minerals, Ltd. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In re: WELLBUTRIN SR : CIVIL ACTION NO. 04-5525

ANTITRUST LITIGATION :

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

MEDICAL MUTUAL OF OHIO, INC. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 05-396

v. :

GLAXOSMITHKLINE PLC, et al. :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 31st day of August, 2010, upon careful consideration of the

defendants' renewed motion for summary judgment on all claims (Docket # 04-5525,

Document # 252) (Docket No. 05-396, Document # 202) and the plaintiffs’ response

thereto, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is DENIED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Lawrence F. Stengel 

LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J.
# C_2016296EN.01004502.xml

| 16.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 296/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 296/45

---

Action brought on 2 June 2016 — ZZ v Commission

(Case F-28/16)

(2016/C 296/57)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: J.-N. Louis and N. de Montigny, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the defendant’s decision not to adopt, within a reasonable period, the measures for compliance with the judgment in Case F-96/13 and annulment of the decision of 22 December 2015, which, by reassigning the applicant, with retroactive effect, from the delegation to the West Bank and the Gaza Strip in East Jerusalem to DG Mobility and Transport, Directorate of Shared Resources MOVE/ENER in Brussels, constitutes a decision confirming refusal to comply with the judgment referred to.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the Commission’s decision not to adopt the measures to comply with the judgment in Case F-96/13 and the decision of 22 December 2015 to reassign the applicant, in the interest of the service, from the EU delegation to the West Bank and the Gaza Strip (East Jerusalem) to the Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport (MOVE) in Brussels with retroactive effect from 1 January 2013, a merely confirmatory decision which has already been implemented for over almost 3 years; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the Commission’s decision not to adopt the measures to comply with the judgment in Case F-96/13 and the decision of 22 December 2015 to reassign the applicant, in the interest of the service, from the EU delegation to the West Bank and the Gaza Strip (East Jerusalem) to the Directorate-General for Mobility and Transport (MOVE) in Brussels with retroactive effect from 1 January 2013, a merely confirmatory decision which has already been implemented for over almost 3 years;

| — | Order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay the costs.

---
Exhibit 31.2

        Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of the Principal Accounting Officer

I, Robert E. Dolan, certify that:

1.  I  have  reviewed  this  Annual  Report  on  Form  10-KSB  of  Sunshine  PCS
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         (a) Designed such disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and  procedures  and  presented  in  this  report  our  conclusions   about  the
effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the  registrant's  internal
control over financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's  fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual  report)  that  has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely  to
materially affect, the registrant's  internal control over financial  reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's  auditors  and the audit  committee  of the  registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

         (a) All significant  deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal  control over financial  reporting which are reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         (b) Any fraud,  whether or not material,  that  involves  management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date:  March 26, 2008


/s/ Robert E. Dolan
-------------------
Robert E. Dolan
Principal Accounting Officer
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1187 

To designate the area between the intersections of International Drive, Northwest and Van Ness Street, Northwest and International Drive, Northwest 

and International Place, Northwest in Washington, District of Columbia, 

as ‘‘Liu Xiaobo Plaza’’, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 18, 2017 

Mr. CRUZ (for himself, Mr. TOOMEY, and Mr. RUBIO) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland 

Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To designate the area between the intersections of International Drive, Northwest and Van Ness Street, Northwest and International Drive, Northwest and International Place, Northwest in Washington, District of Columbia, as ‘‘Liu Xiaobo Plaza’’, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. DESIGNATION OF LIU XIAOBO PLAZA. 

4 (a) DESIGNATION OF PLAZA.— 

5 (1) IN GENERAL.—The area between the inter6 sections of International Drive, Northwest and Van 

7 Ness Street, Northwest and International Drive, 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1187 IS

1 Northwest and International Place, Northwest in 

2 Washington, District of Columbia, shall be known 

3 and designated as ‘‘Liu Xiaobo Plaza’’. 

4 (2) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, 

5 map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of 

6 the area referred to in paragraph (1) shall be 

7 deemed to be a reference to Liu Xiaobo Plaza. 

8 (b) DESIGNATION OF ADDRESS.— 

9 (1) DESIGNATION.—The address of 3505 Inter10 national Place, Northwest, Washington, District of 

11 Columbia, shall be redesignated as 1 Liu Xiaobo 

12 Plaza. 

13 (2) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, 

14 map, regulation, document, paper, or other record of 

15 the United States to the address referred to in para16 graph (1) shall be deemed to be a reference to 1 Liu 

17 Xiaobo Plaza. 

18 (c) SIGNS.—The Administrator of General Services 

19 shall construct street signs that shall— 

20 (1) contain the phrase ‘‘Liu Xiaobo Plaza’’; 

21 (2) be similar in design to the signs used by 

22 Washington, District of Columbia, to designate the 

23 location of Metro stations; and 

24 (3) be placed on— 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1187 IS

1 (A) the parcel of Federal property that is 

2 closest to 1 Liu Xiaobo Plaza (as redesignated 

3 by subsection (b)); and 

4 (B) the street corners of International 

5 Drive, Northwest and Van Ness Street, North6 west and International Drive, Northwest and 

7 International Place, Northwest, Washington, 

8 District of Columbia. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
# C_2017202EN.01002802.xml

| 26.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/28

---

Order of the General Court of 2 May 2017 — Bermejo Garde v EESC

(Case T-511/16) (1)

1

(2017/C 202/45)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Third Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 184, 16.6.2014 (case initially registered before the European Union Civil Service Tribunal under Case No F-23/14 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1.9.2016).

1

---
|EXHIBIT 32
|----------

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Westsphere Asset Corporation, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kim Law, Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|Date: April 16, 2007 |  | By: |  | /s/ Kim Law                                                              
|-------------------- |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                     |  |     |  | Name: Kim LawTitle: Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer
|                     |  |     |  |                                                                          
|                    
|                     |  |    

---
# C_2018094EN.01001702.xml

| 12.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/17

---

Judgment of the General Court of 31 January 2018 — Novartis AG v EUIPO — SK Chemicals (Figurative EU trade mark representing a transdermal patch)

Figurative EU trade mark representing a transdermal patch)

(Case T-44/16) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Figurative EU trade mark representing a transdermal patch - Absolute ground for refusal - Sign consisting exclusively of the shape of the product necessary to obtain a technical result - Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)))

(2018/C 094/21)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Novartis AG (Basle, Switzerland) (represented: initially by M.R. Douglas, and subsequently by A. Nordemann-Schiffel, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: H. Kunz, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court: SK Chemicals GmbH (Eschborn, Germany) (represented by: R. Dissmann, J. Bogatz, and C. Lindenthal, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 November 2015 (Case R 2342/2014-5), relating to invalidity proceedings between SK Chemicals and Novartis.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Novartis AG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Novartis AG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 111, 29.3.2016.

1

---
2176190v1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. 

ASBESTOS PERSONAL INJURY 

SETTLEMENT TRUST, 

 Plaintiff, 

v. 

LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE 

COMPANY, 

 Defendant. 

Civil Action No. 02-4360 

O R D E R

AND NOW, this ____________ day of , 2007, it is hereby 

ORDERED that the application of Richard Shore, Esquire to practice in this Court 

pursuant to Local Rule of Civil Procedure 83.5.2(b) is 

 □ GRANTED.

 □ DENIED.

 

 R. Barclay Surrick 

 United States District Judge 

 

Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 51 Filed 05/30/2007 Page 1 of 5
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 51 Filed 05/30/2007 Page 2 of 5
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 51 Filed 05/30/2007 Page 3 of 5
2176190v1

II. SPONSOR’S STATEMENT, MOTION, AND CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The undersigned member of the bar of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of 

Pennsylvania hereby moves for the admission of to practice in said court pursuant to Local Rule of Civil 

Procedure 83.5.2(b), and certify that I know (or after reasonable inquiry believe) that the applicant is a 

member in good standing of the above-referenced state and federal courts and that the applicant’s private 

and personal character is good. I certify that this application form was on this date mailed, with postage 

prepaid, to all interested counsel. 

 Carmon M. Harvey /s/ Carmon M. Harvey 

Sponsor's Name Sponsor's Signature 

 2004 91444 

Admission date Attorney Identification No. 

SPONSOR’S OFFICE ADDRESS AND TELEPHONE NUMBER: 

 Montgomery, McCracken, Walker & Rhoads, LLP, 123 South Broad Street, Avenue of the Arts, 

 Philadelphia, PA 19109; (215) 772-1500 

Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 51 Filed 05/30/2007 Page 4 of 5
2176190v1

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 I declare under penalty of perjury that a copy of the application of Richard Shore, 

Esquire, to practice in this Court pursuant to Local Rule of Civil Procedure 83.5.2(b) and the 

relevant proposed Order which, if granted, would permit such practice in this Court was mailed 

today with postage prepaid to: 

Edward F. Mannino, Esquire 

Jason A. Snyderman, Esquire 

Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer & Feld, L.L.P. 

One Commerce Square, Suite 2200 

2005 Market Street 

Philadelphia, PA 19103-7086 

A. Hugh Scott, Esquire 

Kathleen Burdette Shields, Esquire 

Choate, Hall & Stewart 

Two International Place 

Boston, MA 02110 

Attorneys for Defendant 

 This document has been filed electronically and is available for viewing and downloading 

from the ECF system. 

Date: May 30, 2007 /s/ Carmon M. Harvey 

Carmon M. Harvey 

Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 51 Filed 05/30/2007 Page 5 of 5
# C_2017283EN.01004202.xml

| 28.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 283/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 283/42

---

Judgment of the General Court of 18 July 2017 — Freddo v EUIPO — Freddo Freddo (Freggo)

(Case T-243/16) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for registration of the figurative EU trade mark ‘freggo’ - Earlier EU figurative trade mark ‘TENTAZIONE FREDDO FREDDO’ - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2017/C 283/64)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Freddo SA (Buenos Aires, Argentina) (represented by: S. Malynicz QC, K. Gilbert and G. Lodge, Solicitors)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: H. O’Neill, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Freddo Freddo, SL (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J.F. Gallego Jiménez and C. Marí Aguilar, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 17 February 2016 (Case R 919/2015-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Freddo Freddo SL and Freddo SA.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Freddo SA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Freddo SA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 243, 4.7.2016.

1

---
(Reap. Dec. 10962)

#### Kurt Orban Co., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 11353.

(Decided April 27, 1965)

*Sharretts, Paley & Garter*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

The following appeal for reappraisement is before me for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by counsel for the parties hereto:

> That the merchandise covered by the appeal to reappraisement enumerated above consists of wire strand exported from Japan during the period beginning February 16,1960 and ending January 28,1962; that wire strand is not identified in the Final List published by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54521, effective February 27, 1958; that on or immediately preceding the date of exportation of each shipment of wire strand covered by the appeal to reappraisement enumerated above, the price at which wire strand, such as or similar to the wire strand described on the invoices covered by the instant appeal to reappraisement was freely *635sold, or in the absence of sales, offered for sale in the principal market of Japan, in the usual wholesale quantity and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other expenses incidental to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, was $252 per metric ton for wire strand of %6-inch diameter (United States funds).

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appeal to reappraisement enumerated above is submitted for decision upon this stipulation and the entry file covered by said appeal.

The stipulated facts establish that the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise, covered by this appeal for reappraisement and as hereinabove described, is statutory export value and that such value is $252 per metric ton for the wire strand of %6-inch diameter (United States funds), and I so hold.

As to all other merchandise included on the invoice covered by the entry involved herein, the appeal for reappraisement is dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.