alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

PHILADELPHIA 76ERS L.P. : CIVIL ACTION

:

 v. :

:

TRUSTMARK INSURANCE COMPANY, : NO. 04-4972

NEW JERSEY NETS BASKETBALL, LLC

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 7th day of December, 2004, upon consideration of the

application of Jeffrey A. Rosenthal, Esquire and James D. Mathews, Esquire to practice

in this Court pursuant to Local Rule of Civil Procedure 83.5.2(b), it is hereby

ORDERED that the application is GRANTED.

 

 Edmund V. Ludwig, J.

Case 2:04-cv-04972-EL Document 17 Filed 12/09/2004 Page 1 of 1

PHILADELPHIA 76ERS L.P. v. TRUSTMARK INSURANCE COMPANY et al Doc. 17

Dockets.Justia.com
----

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 11 May 2006 — Commission of the European Communities v Italian Republic

(Case C-197/03) (1)

(Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Directive 69/335/EEC - Articles 10 and 12 - Indirect taxes on the raising of capital - Principles of Community law relating to recovery of undue payment)

(2006/C 165/01)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Commission of the European Communities (represented by: E. Traversa, Agent)

Defendan): Italian Republic (represented by: I.M. Braguglia, Agent, and by M.P. Gentili, lawyer)

Re:

Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations — Breach of Article 10(c) of Council Directive 69/335/EEC of 17 July 1969 concerning indirect taxes on the raising of capital (OJ, English Special Edition 1969(II), p. 412) — National law introducing retrospectively flat-rate annual charges on the registration of documents other than companies instruments of incorporation and laying down a discriminatory and restrictive system for reimbursement of the annual charge on registration of companies instruments of incorporation

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

----

(1)OJ C 171, 19.07.2003.

----
**Exhibit 32.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANESOXLEY**

**ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Galaxy Next Generation, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 1) pursuant for the year ended June 30, 2020, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Magen McGahee, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

Date: October 16, 2020

*/s/ Magen McGahee           *

Magen McGahee

Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Director
# 2018_06 Pivot Table 5A

&F	

&P/&N

# 5

&F	

&P/&N
**TKP** IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 20 - 0173 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee, v. JOSEPH PAUL DEWISE,

Defendant and Appellant.

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30 -day extension of time, and good cause appearing therefor, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellee is granted an extension of time to and including March 4 , 2022 , within which to prepare, serve, and file the State’s response .

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 26 2022

01/26/2022

Case Number: DA 20-0173
Exhibit 10.9


 


	
  

  	
   

  	
  Patrick R.Darr

  President

  

  Centreplex Office Building

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  821 Copilot Centre Boulevard

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Largo,
  Maryland 20774

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  301-808-4330 - fax 301-808-4332

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  pdarr@tmtickets.com

  



 


February 6, 2006


 


By Telecopy and UPS


 


Ticketmaster Corporation


8800 Sunset Boulevard


West Hollywood, California 90069


Attention: Terry Barnes, Chairman and Ed Weiss, Executive Vice
President and General Counsel


 


Re:                             License
Agreement (the “License Agreement”) dated May 23, 1991 between
Ticketmaster Corporation (“TM”) and Ticketmaster Group Limited Partnership (“TGLP”),
as amended, and as previously extended pursuant to a notice dated February 7,
2001 (the “Extension Notice”)


 


Dear Terry:


 


The purpose of this letter is to notify TM,
pursuant to Section 2 of the License Agreement, that TGLP elects to renew
the License Agreement for a second, additional five (5)-year term, commencing
on July 1, 2006. We previously agreed in the Extension Notice that the
Operational Date under the License Agreement was July 1, 1991. Therefore, July 1,
2006 will be the fifteenth (15th) anniversary of the Operational
Date, and also the commencement date of the second, five (5)-year renewal term.
The second renewal term will expire on June 30, 2011.


 


Please sign, date and return this letter to
Patrick Darr by telecopy to acknowledge your receipt of this letter and to
signify your agreement that the term of the License Agreement has been renewed
until June 30, 2011 by this notice. In addition, we are sending via UPS two (2)
originals copies of this agreement signed by Patrick Darr. Please sign one (1) original
copy and return it to Patrick Darr. Thank you.


 


Very truly yours,


 


Ticketmaster Group Limited Partnership


 


	
  By:

  	
   

  	
  AP Tickets, Inc., Sole General Partner

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  By

  	
   /s/ Patrick R. Darr

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  	
  Patrick R. Darr, President

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  cc:

  	
   

  	
  Michael H. Leahy, Esq.

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
  Receipt of Notice and Renewal of Term of License Agreement
  Acknowledged and Agreed to: 

  
	
   

  	
   

  	
   

  
	
  Ticketmaster corporation

  
	
   

  	
   

  
	
  By

  	
  /s/ ILLEGIBLE 

  	
   

  
	
   

  
	
  Dated: February 16, 2006
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

TOLEDO MACK SALES & :

SERVICE, INC., : CIVIL ACTION

:

Plaintiff, : NO. 02-CV-4373

:

v. :

:

MACK TRUCKS, INC., :

:

Defendant. :

______________________________________________________________________________

MACK TRUCKS, INC., :

:

Counterclaim :

Plaintiff, :

v. :

:

TOLEDO MACK SALES & :

SERVICE, INC., :

:

Counterclaim :

Defendant. :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 30th day of March, 2005, upon consideration of Plaintiff’s

Motion for Leave to Supplement the Record with Newly-Discovered Evidence (Docket No. 69),

it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion is DENIED, as moot.

BY THE COURT:

______________________________

RONALD L. BUCKWALTER, S.J.

Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 70 Filed 03/30/2005 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-7726

ELMER EUGENE HEATH,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

RONALD J. ANGELONE,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, Chief District

Judge. (CA-00-920-7)

Submitted: March 22, 2002 Decided: April 12, 2002

Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Elmer Eugene Heath, Appellant Pro Se. Mark Ralph Davis, OFFICE OF

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Elmer Eugene Heath seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny

a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the district court. Heath v. Angelone, No. CA-00-920-

7 (W.D. Va. Sept. 26, 2001). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Report of FullCircle Registry, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Norman L. Frohreich, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


| |     |                                                                                                                                                    
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                    
| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
| |     |                                                                                                                                                    
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Norman L. Frohreich Norman L. Frohreich, Chief Executive Officer & Principal Accounting Officer April 15, 2011
---

EXHIBIT 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. §1350,AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Dorato Resources Inc.
(the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended January 31, 2011, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Michael Kinley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

Dated: July 29, 2011

| | /s/
      Anna Ladd    
| | -----------------------
| | Anna Ladd              
| | Chief Financial Officer

---
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

December 10, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 03-40855

Conference Calendar

 

TONY LEE BLACKLOCK,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

RICHARD MORRIS, Major; THOMAS BOUGHNER, Captain; 

DANIEL DOMINGUEZ, Sergeant; ONY TREVINO, Correctional Officer IV;

NORMA SAENZ,

Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. C-03-CV-94

--------------------

Before DAVIS, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Tony Lee Blacklock, Texas prisoner # 660791, appeals from

the district court’s dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint

for failure to state a claim. Blacklock argues that the prison

officials were deliberately indifferent to his need for

protection from the other inmates. Blacklock further alleges

that Thomas Boughner and Norma Saenz violated his civil rights by

reducing his classification status, placing him on restriction,
No. 03-40855

-2-

and failing to interview witnesses in connection with a

disciplinary hearing.

Blacklock has not stated a cognizable claim for relief by

showing both that the conditions of his incarceration posed “a

substantial risk of serious harm” and that prison officials

exhibited deliberate indifference to his need for protection. 

Newton v. Black, 133 F.3d 301, 308 (5th Cir. 1998). Blacklock

fails to state a constitutional claim arising out of the

disciplinary hearing. See Harper v. Showers, 174 F.3d 716, 719

(5th Cir. 1999). The district court did not err in dismissing

Blacklock’s complaint.

Because Blacklock’s appeal is without arguable merit, it is

DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS. See Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 219-20

(5th Cir. 1983); 5TH CIR. R. 42.2. The dismissal of this appeal

and the district court’s dismissal of Blacklock’s complaint for

failure to state a claim count as strikes under the Prison

Litigation Reform Act. Adepegba v. Hammons, 103 F.3d 383, 387

(5th Cir. 1996). Blacklock previously earned two strikes in

Blacklock v. Hamilton, No. 97-10304 (5th Cir. Oct. 21, 1997)

(dismissing as frivolous an appeal from the district court’s

dismissal as frivolous), and he was cautioned in that opinion

that future frivolous civil suits and appeals filed by him would

invite the imposition of sanctions. Because Blacklock has

accumulated at least three strikes under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), he

is BARRED from proceeding in forma pauperis in any civil action
No. 03-40855

-3-

or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any

facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical

injury. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

APPEAL DISMISSED; 28 U.S.C. § 1915 BAR IMPOSED.
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No s

. 1 D 17

- 1207 1D17

- 1397 (Consolidated for disposition)

_____________________________
F LORIDA F ARM B UREAU C ASUALTY I NSURANCE C OMPANY and F LORIDA F ARM B UREAU G ENERAL I NSURANCE C OMPANY , Florida corporation s , Appellant s ,

v.

M AY N URSERY , I NC ., N ATHAN W ILDER , and D AMARLON D EON D EBOSE , Appellee s

.

___________________________
O n appeal from the Circuit Court for Gadsden County

. Francis J. Allman , Judge

. September 18, 2018

P E R C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
R AY , B ILBREY , and W INOKUR , JJ., concur

.2 _____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________ Caryn L. Bellus and Barbar a E. Fox of Kubicki Draper, P.A., Miami
, for Appellant s

. William D. Horgan and J. Breck Brannen of Pennington, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellees May Nursery, Inc. and Nathan Wilder. No appearance for Damarlon Debose

.
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 47 Filed 03/11/2003 Page 1 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 47 Filed 03/11/2003 Page 2 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 47 Filed 03/11/2003 Page 3 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 47 Filed 03/11/2003 Page 4 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 47 Filed 03/11/2003 Page 5 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 47 Filed 03/11/2003 Page 6 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 47 Filed 03/11/2003 Page 7 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 47 Filed 03/11/2003 Page 8 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 47 Filed 03/11/2003 Page 9 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 47 Filed 03/11/2003 Page 10 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 47 Filed 03/11/2003 Page 11 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 47 Filed 03/11/2003 Page 12 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 47 Filed 03/11/2003 Page 13 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 47 Filed 03/11/2003 Page 14 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 47 Filed 03/11/2003 Page 15 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 47 Filed 03/11/2003 Page 16 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 47 Filed 03/11/2003 Page 17 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 47 Filed 03/11/2003 Page 18 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 47 Filed 03/11/2003 Page 19 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 47 Filed 03/11/2003 Page 20 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 47 Filed 03/11/2003 Page 21 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 47 Filed 03/11/2003 Page 22 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 47 Filed 03/11/2003 Page 23 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 47 Filed 03/11/2003 Page 24 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 47 Filed 03/11/2003 Page 25 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 47 Filed 03/11/2003 Page 26 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 47 Filed 03/11/2003 Page 27 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 47 Filed 03/11/2003 Page 28 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 47 Filed 03/11/2003 Page 29 of 30
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 47 Filed 03/11/2003 Page 30 of 30
TT4h

HESTERN ov"

Darien, Georgia 31305 A
Phone Abgust 3s Bw \ = OFest Office Box
(912) 437-4141 WV \ 455

Cynthia L. Johnson

Director, Cash Management Policy
& Planning Division

Financial Management Service

Room 420

401 14" Street, SW

Washington, D.C. 20227

Dear Ms. Johnson:

Last week, we received notice that the Department of Treasury, Financial Management
Service, is proposing to revise its regulations governing the TT&L program, in particular,
the interest rate charged by Treasury on TT&L note balances. As stated in the Notice of
Proposed Rulemaking, Treasury is proposing to change the basis for computing the
TT&L rate of interest to an overnight repurchase agreement rate in order to better
approximate the market interest rate for collateralized lending. Under the current rule,
the TT&L rate of interest approximates the target federal funds rate less 25 basis points.

Banks, including Southeastern Bank, and other financial institutions collect federal tax
payments on a daily basis via paper transmittals or EFTPS; banks, with the exception of
certain small banks, receive no compensation from the Department of Treasury for
handling these payments. The overhead costs, particularly personnel, involved with the
TT&L program are substantial. Tellers, bookkeepers, internal auditors, and compliance
officers as well as edp and Fedline personnel are all necessarily, for internal control or
other reasons, involved in the TT&L program. Banks like us have readily participated in
the Note Option program because cost of funds for the Note Option program was
marginally lower than cost of funds for certain alternatives, this slight differential
theoretically mitigated, in part, the overhead costs associated with our involvement in
collecting and processing federal tax payments. If the Department of Treasury
implements the new, more expensive rate structure, we would have to reconsider and
possibly terminate our participation in the Note Option program. Simply stated, the
proposed rate structure severely diminishes our incentive for participating in the Note
Option program. Furthermore, as you know, Note Option funds are not held for fixed
terms and are callable at virtually any time; hence, these funds have been unreliable as a
source of funds for any duration. The funding alternatives to the Note Option program,
although more expensive historically, have better defined holding periods and would
become more attractive relative to the proposed Treasury rate structure. If TT&L funds
become available for a guaranteed term of reasonable duration, we would be more


favorably inclined towards the new rate structure, otherwise, we are unequivocally
opposed.

We appreciate the opportunity to comment on the proposed rule. If you have any
questions or need additional information, please let me know.

Sincerely,
# C_2017129EN.01002001.xml

| 24.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/20

---

Judgment of the General Court of 9 March 2017 — Marsh v EUIPO (ClaimsExcellence)

(Case T-308/16) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Application for the EU word mark ClaimsExcellence - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptiveness - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2017/C 129/32)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Marsh GmbH (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by: W. Riegger, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: R. Manea and D. Hanf, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Objet

Objet

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 April 2016 (Case R 2358/2015-4), concerning an application for registration of the word sign ClaimsExcellence as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the action;

| 2) | Orders Marsh GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders Marsh GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 287, 8.8.2016.

1

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MARA FLAMM : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. :

:

SARNER & ASSOCIATES, P.C.; JOSHUA SARNER; : NO. 02-4302

LEONARD SARNER, ESQUIRE; :

JODI H. BROWN, M.D.; JOHN MATUSAVAGE; :

JOHN DOE PROCESS SERVER, INDIVIDUALLY AND :

AS AGENT FOR SARNER 7 ASSOCIATES, P.C.; :

JOSHUA SARNER, ESQUIRE; LEONARD SARNER, :

ESQUIRE; AND JODI H. BROWN, M.D. :

ORDER

Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 16(b)(1)-(3) and 26(f), a pretrial conference in

this matter will be held on September 18, 2002, at 10:20 a.m. before the Honorable M. Faith

Angell, United States Magistrate Judge, Room 3030, Third Floor, United States Courthouse, 601

Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 19106.

It is the obligation of counsel for the plaintiff to serve a copy of this Order upon counsel for

all of the defendants and upon counsel for any other parties joined prior to the date of the conference,

as soon as the identity of such counsel is learned.

Date: July 10, 2002

BY THE COURT:

 

M. FAITH ANGELL

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 3 Filed 07/11/2002 Page 1 of 1
# U n i ted S t a te s C o u r t o f A ppe a l s F OR T HE D IS TRICT OF C OLUM BIA C IRCUI T

___ ___ ___ ___ 

## No. 22-5213 September Term, 2022 1: 22-c v -014 83-UNA Filed O n: Janu ary11 , 20 23 Brud Rossm ann , Esquire,

App ellant
v . Josep h R. B iden , Jr., P residen t of the United Sta tes, et a l., App ellees

ON A PPE A L FROM THE UNITED STA TES DIS TRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BEFORE: Mill ett and Pillard, Circuit Ju dges, a nd Sen telle, Sen ior Circuit

Judge J U D G M E N T T his ap pea l w as co nside red o n th e reco rd f rom the United Sta tes District Cou rt for th e District of

Colum bia a nd on the brief f iled b y ap pellan t. S ee Fed. R. Ap p. P

. 34(a )(2); D.C. Cir. Rule 34 (j). It is ORDERED A ND A DJUDGED tha t th e d istrict court’s Ju ly 15 , 20 22 orde r dism issing appe llant’s co mp laint b e a f f irmed . T he district cou rt correctly conclud ed tha t the com plaint , which lacked an arguab le ba sis eithe r in law or in fact, was f rivolou s. See Neitzke v . W illiams, 4 90 U.S. 3 19, 32 5 (19 89); see also 2 8 U.S .C. § 191 5(e)(2)(B)(i)(district cou rt “shall dism iss the case at any time if the cou rt de term ines tha t . . . th e a ction or ap pea l . . . is f rivolou s or m alicious”). Pursua nt t o D.C. Circuit Ru le 36 , th is dispo sition will no t be pu blished . T he Clerk is directe d to w ithho ld issua nce of the m and ate he rein u ntil seven d ays af ter reso lution

# U n i ted S t a te s C o u r t o f A ppe a l s F OR T HE D IS TRICT OF C OLUM BIA C IRCUI T

___ ___ ___ ___ 

## No. 22-5213 September Term, 2022
of an y tim ely petition for rehe aring or pe tition for rehe aring en ban c. S ee Fed. R. Ap p. P. 4 1(b); D.C. Cir. Rule 41

. Per Curiam FOR THE COURT: Mark J. La nger, Clerk BY: /s/ Daniel J. Reidy Depu ty Cl erk