alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32(i)

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection  with the  quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB of Dialog Group,
Inc.  (the  "Company")  for the  quarter  ended June 30,  2006 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  Peter V. DeCrescenzo,  the Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, that:

      (1) the Report  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a)
or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: August 14, 2006

                                        /s/ Peter V. DeCrescenzo
                                        ----------------------------------
                                        Peter V. DeCrescenzo, CEO
# C_2017112EN.01001201.xml

| 10.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/12

---

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 January 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Kúria — Hungary) — Magyar Villamos Művek Zrt. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatóság

(Case C-28/16) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Value added tax - Directive 2006/112/EC - Articles 2, 9, 26, 167, 168 and 173 - Deduction of input tax - Taxable person simultaneously carrying out economic and non-economic activities - Holding company supplying services to its subsidiaries free of charge))

(2017/C 112/17)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Referring court

Kúria — Hungary

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Magyar Villamos Művek Zrt.

Applicant:

Defendant: Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatóság

Defendant:

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

Articles 2, 9, 26, 167, 168 and 173 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as meaning that, in so far as the involvement of a holding company, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, in the management of its subsidiaries, where it has charged those subsidiaries neither for the cost of the services procured in the interest of the group of companies as a whole or in the interest of certain of its subsidiaries, nor for the corresponding VAT, does not constitute an ‘economic activity’, within the meaning of that directive, such a holding company does not have the right to deduct input VAT paid in respect of those services in so far as those services relate to transactions falling outside the scope of that directive.

---

(1)  OJ C 156, 2.5.2016.

1

---
No. 51935.

#### Wing Chong Lung Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 64305-K, etc. (Los Angeles, etc.).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 WESTERN RESERVE BANCORP, INC.
FORM 10-QSB
Quarter ended March 31, 2005 CERTIFICATION OF FINANCIAL RESULTS I, Edward J. McKeon, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Western Reserve Bancorp, Inc.,
hereby certify the following:  §
    This Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and§
    The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial position and results of operations of Western Reserve Bancorp, Inc. as of
and for the periods presented. /s/ Edward J. McKeonEdward J. McKeonPresident and Chief Executive OfficerMay 16, 2005
 Page 38
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION
 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report
of Westsphere Asset Corporation, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the
period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Douglas MacDonald, Chief Executive Officer,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
               Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The
information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|                      |                                                                                                                 
|--------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date:  April 15, 2008 | By: /s/ Douglas Mac Donald
Name: Douglas Mac Donald
Title: Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

---
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D18-2522

_____________________________

FRANCIS R. SWANSON,

Petitioner,

v.

FLORIDA COMMISSION ON 

OFFENDER REVIEW,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Certiorari—Original Jurisdiction.

November 6, 2018

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari is denied on the merits.

ROWE, BILBREY, and WINSOR, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________
2

Francis R. Swanson, pro se, Petitioner.

Rana Wallace, General Counsel, and Mark Hiers, Assistant 

General Counsel, Florida Commission on Offender Review, 

Tallahassee, for Respondent.
MP

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 20-0074

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

BRICE WILLIAM WILKE,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT OF EXTENSION

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to 

and including August 9, 2021, within which to prepare, serve, and file its response 

brief.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

July 8 2021

07/08/2021

Case Number: DA 20-0074
No. 52511.

protests 862318-G, etc. (New York).

#### Premier Peat Moss Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of peat moss of the same character as that passed upon in *Peat Import Corp.*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 181, C. D. 319), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1685 was sustained.
Exhibit 32.1

Certification  Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

I,
Wei Zhou, President and Chief Executive Officer of INTAC International, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the "Act") that
to my knowledge on the date hereof:



Dated:
May 6, 2005

| |  |  | /s/WEI ZHOUWei Zhou
President and Chief Executive Officer
| |  |  | ---------------------------------------------------------

This
certification is being furnished solely for purposes of Section 906 of the Act, and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act of 1934,
or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.

---



QuickLinks
Case 2:04-cv-01653-JCJ Document 128 Filed 03/05/09 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:04-cv-01653-JCJ Document 128 Filed 03/05/09 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit
      23.2**





**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**





We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No.
      333-125814 on Form S-8 of EnerTeck Corporation, of our report dated March 28,
      2007 with respect to the financial statements of EnerTeck Corporation included
      in its Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31,
      2006.








/s/
      Philip Vogel & Co. PC


Philip
      Vogel & Co. PC


Dallas,
      Texas





April
      16,
      2007
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

: CIVIL ACTION NOS.

:

JAQUAY, et al. : 02-3882

DAUSE : 02-3928

GETTO : 02-3946

HERSH, et al. : 02-4104

DELLOLIO : 02-4141

VARMER.et al. : 02-4200

BURNS, et al. : 02-4233

SEBESTYEN, et al. : 02-4262

DIXON, et al. : 02-4325

:

VS. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION, et al. :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of July, 2002, the Court having been previously

advised that the above action cannot proceed to trial and disposition because of the following

reason:

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending disposition of a related

action.

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending determination of

arbitration proceedings.

[ ] - Interlocutory appeal filed.

[ X ] - Other: Case is placed into suspense pending receipt of the Case

Transfer Order from the Judicial Panel on Multi District Litigation

transferring case to District of Minnesota..

Case 2:02-cv-04325-CG Document 2 Filed 07/15/2002 Page 1 of 2
It is

ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this action closed for statistical purposes and

place the matter in the Civil Suspense File, and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction; and that the case be

restored to the trial docket when the action is in a status so that it may proceed to final

disposition; this order shall not prejudice the rights of the parties to this litigation.

BY THE COURT:

________________________________________

Clifford Scott Green, Judge

Case 2:02-cv-04325-CG Document 2 Filed 07/15/2002 Page 2 of 2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 (as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002), I, the Chief Executive Officer of Advanced Healthcare,
Inc. (the 'Company"), hereby certify, that to the best of my knowledge, the
annual report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended March 31, 2003
(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: June 20, 2003

/s/ Daniel Motsinger
- --------------------
Chief Executive Officer




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 (as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-
Oxley Act of 2002), I, the Chief Financial Officer of Advanced Healthcare,
Inc. (the 'Company"), hereby certify, that to the best of my knowledge, the
annual report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended March 31, 2003
(the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: June 20, 2003

/s/Daniel Starczewski
- --------------------------------
Daniel Starczewski, Chief Financial Officer
No. 56339.

protests 148754-K and 148753-K (Los Angeles).

#### Modern Food Products Co. and Mutual Trading Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

From a careful consideration of the record, the court was unable to find evidence sufficient to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the classification of the collector. In view of the incomplete state of the record before the court, the protests were overruled.
# C_2017283EN.01003701.xml

| 28.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 283/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 283/37

---

Judgment of the General Court of 18 July 2017 — Alfonso Egüed v EUIPO — Jackson Family Farms (BYRON)

(Case T-45/16) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark BYRON - Earlier non-registered trade mark BYRON - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Rules governing common-law actions for passing-off - Goodwill - Proof of the acquisition and continued existence of the earlier right))

(2017/C 283/55)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Nelson Alfonso Egüed (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: N. Fernández Fernández-Pacheco, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Jackson Family Farms LLC (Santa Rosa, California, United States)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 November 2015 (Case R 822/2015-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Jackson Family Farms and Mr Alfonso Egüed.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Nelson Alfonso Egüed to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Nelson Alfonso Egüed to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 111, 29.3.2016.

1

---
No. 63580.

protest 59/10751 (New York).

#### Penson and Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

An examination of the official papers showing that the protest was filed more than 60 days after liquidation, the protest was dismissed as untimely, by virtue of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.
# C_2017202EN.01000701.xml

| 26.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 27 April 2017 — European Commission v Hellenic Republic

(Case C-202/16) (1)

1

((Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Environment - Waste management - Directives 2008/98/EC and 1999/31/EC - Waste disposal site in Temploni (Greece)))

(2017/C 202/09)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: M. Patakia and E. Sanfrutos Cano acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: E. Skandalou, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Declares that, by tolerating the operation of the waste disposal site in Temploni (Greece), which does not satisfy the conditions and requirements laid down in the environmental legislation of the European Union, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 13 of Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives, and Article 8(a), Article 11(1) and Annex I to Council Directive 1999/31/EC of 26 April 1999 on the landfill of waste; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Declares that, by tolerating the operation of the waste disposal site in Temploni (Greece), which does not satisfy the conditions and requirements laid down in the environmental legislation of the European Union, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 13 of Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain Directives, and Article 8(a), Article 11(1) and Annex I to Council Directive 1999/31/EC of 26 April 1999 on the landfill of waste;

| 2) | Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 200, 6.6.2016.

1

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WILLIAM A. FENSTERMACHER : CIVIL ACTION

 

 vs. :

FRANK D. GILLIS and : 

THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE

COUNTY OF NORTHAMPTON and :

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE 

STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA : NO. 05-CV-344

 ORDER

 AND NOW, this 13th day of July, 2005, upon

consideration of the pleadings and record herein, and after

review of the Report and Recommendation of United States

Magistrate Judge Charles B. Smith and the Petitioner’s Objections

thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that:

 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED 

 and ADOPTED.

 2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 

 28 U.S.C. §2254 is DENIED.

 3. There is no probable cause to issue a

 certificate of appealability.

 BY THE COURT:

 s/J. Curtis Joyner 

 J. CURTIS JOYNER, J.

Case 2:05-cv-00344-JCJ Document 14 Filed 07/14/05 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 10.11**

**GENERAL MARITIME CORPORATION**

**Amendment No. 1 to GeneralMaritime Corporation’s 2001 Stock Incentive Plan**

**(asamended and restated, effective March 30, 2006)**

Section 2.7(e) of the2001 Stock Incentive Plan of General Maritime Corporation (the “Company”), asamended and restated (effective March 30, 2006), is hereby amended by addingthe underscored sentence to the end thereof as set forth below:

(e)           Minimum Vesting Periods.  To the extent that vesting of restrictedstock is based on the grantee’s continued employment (or other service) withthe Company for a specified period, the shares of restricted stock shall notvest in full until the third anniversary of the grant date, provided, however,that in each calendar year the Committee may grant up to 76,597 restrictedshares (subject to adjustment as provided in Section 3.7(a)) with shortervesting periods to (i) non-employee directors in lieu of director fees, and(ii) new employees or consultants in connection with their commencingemployment or other service.  For the avoidance of doubt, this Section2.7(e) shall not preclude the accelerated vesting of restricted stock in thecase of termination of employment, death, disability, Change in Control, orsimilar special circumstances.

December 18, 2006

 

 

----
EXHIBIT 23.3

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS

October 27, 2011

GMX Resources Inc.

One Benham Place, Suite 600

9400 North Broadway

Oklahoma City,
OK 73114

Re: Consent of Independent Petroleum Engineers

To whom it may concern:

MHA Petroleum Consultants, Inc. hereby consents to the
incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-106311, 333-150356, 333-151916, and 333-167582) on Form S-8 of GMX Resources Inc. and registration statements (No. 333-134911, 333-149710, 333-150368 and 333-171521) on Form S-3 of
the references to our report relating to the proved oil and natural gas reserves of GMX Resources Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2010, and to the reference to our firm as experts in such registration statements with respect to such
report.

Very truly yours,



|                                
|--------------------------------
|MHA PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS, INC. 
|                                
|/s/    John W. Arsenault        
|John W. Arsenault Vice
President
# C_2019093EN.01004101.xml

| 11.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 93/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 93/41

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 January 2019 — Bena Properties v Council

(Case T-412/16) (1)

((Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against Syria - Freezing of funds - Rights of the defence - Right to effective judicial protection - Obligation to state reasons - Manifest error of assessment - Right to respect for one’s good name and reputation - Right to property - Presumption of innocence - Proportionality))

(2019/C 93/51)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Bena Properties Co. SA (Damascus, Syria) (represented by: E. Ruchat, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: initially S. Kyriakopoulou, G. Etienne and A. Vitro, then S. Kyriakopoulou and A. Vitro, and finally S. Kyriakopoulou, A. Vitro and V. Piessevaux, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/850 of 27 May 2016, amending Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2016 L 141, p. 125) and the subsequent measures implementing it, Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/917 of 29 May 2017 amending Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2017 L 139, p. 62), and Council Decision (CFSP) 2018/778 of 28 May 2018 amending Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2018 L 131, p. 16), in so far as those measures concern the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Declares that Bena Properties Co. SA is to bear its own costs and orders it to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Declares that Bena Properties Co. SA is to bear its own costs and orders it to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ C 364, 3.10.2016.

---
# C_2017382EN.01002401.xml

| 13.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 382/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 382/24

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 20 September 2017 — European Commission v Frucona Košice a.s.

(Case C-300/16 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - State aid - Concept of ‘aid’ - Concept of ‘economic advantage’ - Private creditor test - Conditions of applicability - Application - Investigation obligations on the European Commission))

(2017/C 382/27)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: European Commission (represented by: K. Walkerová, L. Armati, T. Maxian Rusche and B. Stromsky, acting as Agents)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Frucona Košice a.s. (represented by: K. Lasok QC, B. Hartnett, Barrister, J. Holmes QC, and O. Geiss, Rechtsanwalt)

Other party to the proceedings:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 260, 18.7.2016.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Duke Capital LLC (Duke Capital) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David L. Hauser, President of Duke Capital, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Duke Capital.
| | --- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                     |  |                          
|-------------------- |  | -------------------------
|Date: August 9, 2004 |  |                          
|                     | 
|                     |  | /S/    DAVID L.
HAUSER   
|                     |  | David L. Hauser President