alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit      32.2**

**Statement      of Chief Financial Officer Furnished**

**Pursuant      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

|  | A) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d))                and |
|--|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | B) | the                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the Company                  as of the dates and for the periods covered by the                  Report. |
|--|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| May                  12,                  2008                                           Dated | /s/ Gary F.                Hoskins                                            Gary                  F. HoskinsChief                  Financial Officer |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
<PAGE>
EXHIBIT 32 (a)


    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northland Cable Television, Inc. and
Subsidiary (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form
10-Q"), I, John Whetzell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;

      (1) The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)
      or (15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78(d));
      and

      (2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.




DATE: 8-13-03


/s/  JOHN S. WHETZELL
------------------------------
John S. Whetzell
Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement will be retained by Northland Cable
Television, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 
U.S.C. Section 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Annual Report of Westsphere Asset Corporation, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Kim Law, Vice
President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                          
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report
  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
| |     |                                                                                                                                                          
| | (2) | The
  information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
  the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                     |                                                                |            
|-------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------- | -----------
|Date: May
  14, 2009 | By:                                                            | /s/ Kim Law
|                     |                                                                |            
|                     | Name: Kim
  Law                                               
|                     | Title: Vice
  President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JANICE DRY and

KENNETH DRY

:

:

: CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-CV-4225

Plaintiffs, :

:

v. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION;

BAYER AG;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE;

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM

:

:

:

:

:

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

:

Defendants. :

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of the Court:

Kindly enter the appearances of Hope S. Freiwald, Aline Fairweather, Erin

Brennan and Kirstin J. Miller as attorneys for defendant GlaxoSmithKline PLC.

Respectfully Submitted,

_____________________________ _____________________________

Hope S. Freiwald Aline Fairweather

_____________________________ _____________________________

Erin Brennan Kirstin J. Miller

DECHERT PRICE & RHOADS

4000 Bell Atlantic Tower

1717 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2793

(215) 994-4000

Case 2:02-cv-04225-SD Document 9 Filed 09/11/2002 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JOYCE and CARROLL J. FOSS :

: CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-CV-4286

Plaintiffs, :

:

v. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION;

BAYER AG;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE;

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM

:

:

:

:

:

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

:

Defendants. :

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of the Court:

Kindly enter the appearances of Hope S. Freiwald, Aline Fairweather, Erin

Brennan and Kirstin J. Miller as attorneys for defendant SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a

GlaxoSmithKline.

Respectfully Submitted,

_____________________________ _____________________________

Hope S. Freiwald Aline Fairweather

_____________________________ _____________________________

Erin Brennan Kirstin J. Miller

DECHERT PRICE & RHOADS

4000 Bell Atlantic Tower

1717 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2793

(215) 994-4000

Case 2:02-cv-04286-RB Document 7 Filed 09/20/2002 Page 1 of 1
October 13,2015 No. 04-15-00570-CV PEVETO COMPANIES, LTD. D/B/A BRAKE CHECK, Appellant

V. FASA FRICTION LABORATORIES, INC., Appellee From the 45th Judicial DistrictCourt, BexarCounty, Texas Trial Court No. 2011-01-20405 Honorable SolomonCasseb, III, Judge Presiding ORDER 

### This court has determined that this dispute is appropriate for referral to an Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) procedure. See Tex. Civ. Prac. Rem. Code § 154.021 (West 2011). All further 

### communications with this court by the parties regarding ADR shall be directed to the Clerk ofthe Court for any assistance in the mediation process. All parties are ORDERED to respond in writing by October 27, 2015 stating: (I) the name and address of the mediator of their choice; or (2) any objection to mediation and the reasons for such objection, See id. § 154.022 (b). Provided the parties submit to mediation, this court will issue an order suspending all appellate 

### deadlines for forty-five (45) days in order that the parties may concentrate on the scheduling and completionofthe mediationprocess. Is it so ORDERED on October 13, 2015. Marialyn/Barnard, Justice 

### lEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixeythe seal of the ?aidcourt on

E. Hottle, Clerk
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS49253 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the Court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 00-10180

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GUADALUPE CARBAJAL-GARCIA,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

(4:99-CR-196-Y)

November 3, 2000

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Guadalupe Carbajal-Garcia appeals the sentence imposed for his

guilty-plea conviction of possession for methamphetamine with

intent to distribute, in violatio n of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1).

Carbajal contends that the district c ourt erred in enhancing his

sentence, pursuant to § 2D1.1(b)(1) of the Sentencing Guidelines,

for possession of a dangerous weapon. S ee U.S.S.G. § 2D1.1(b)(1).

“The adjustment should be applied if the weapon was present, unless

it is clearly improbable that the weapon was connected with the

offense.” I d

., comment (n.3) (emphasis added). We review only for2

clear e rror. S ee e.g., United States v. Vital

, 68 F.3d 114, 119

(5th Cir. 1995).

Pursuant to § 2D1.1(b)(1), a defendant may be held accountable

for a codefendant’s reasonably foreseeable possession of a firearm

during the commission of a drug trafficking offense. E .g., United

States v. Ag uilera-Zapata , 901 F.2d 1209, 1215 (5th Cir. 1990).

The Government may prove such possession by showing that “a

temporal and spatial relationship existed between the weapon, the

drug trafficking activity, and the [co]defendant”. United States

v. Mergerso n , 4 F.3d 337, 350 (5th Cir. 1993), c ert. denied, 510

U.S. 1198 (1994). This nexus may be proved by evidence that the

weapon was found in the same locatio n where the drugs or drug

paraphernalia were stored or where part of the transaction

occurred. Id.

The weapons were found in at least two bedrooms of the

apartment of one of Carbajal’s code fendants. Carbajal left that

apartment shortly before he delivered the methamphetamine, with the

weapons being found later that day. In short, there is a spatial

and temporal connection between the weapons and the offense. See

id. Therefore, the district court’s finding of possession was n ot

clearly erroneous.

Carbajal contends he never stayed at his codefendant’s

apartment o r spent any time in the rooms where the weapons were

fou nd. However, as noted, regardless of Carbajal’s knowledge of

the pre sence of the firearms, he may be held responsible if he

could have reasonably foreseen his codefendan t’s possession of

them. See Aguilera-Zapata

, 901 F.2d at 1215. Because firearms are3

well-known “tools of the trade” of those engaged in illegal drug

trafficking, the district court did not clearly err in finding that

Carbajal could reasonably have foreseen his codefendant’s

possession of the weapons. S ee Mergerson

, 4 F.3d a t 350 (citing

Aguilera-Zapata , 901 F.2d at 1215-16).

AFFIRMED
# Materials Not Included in **Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket**

Docket Number: FAA- 2011 - 0025 Directorate Identifier: 2010NM208AD MPD D622 W0 01 - 9 --- 1/10

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MA **Y BE VIEWED AT:** Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 **DURING THE HOURS OF:** 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 03/05/2008
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS Appeal of

-- ) ) Oatridge Security Group ) ) Under Contract No. W911RX-16-D-0003 ) APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT:
APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: ASBCANo. 61857

Mr. Cy A. Oatridge

President Raymond M. Saunders, Esq.

Army ChiefTrial Attorney CPT Richard Hagner, JA

Trial Attorney ORDER OF DISMISSAL The Board is in receipt ofappellant's submission dated June 7, 2019, requesting that this appeal be dismissed without prejudice. Appellant asserts that it intends to file a new claim for a contracting officer's final decision. For good cause shown, the appeal is dismissed without prejudice. Dated: June 13, 2019 

# ~)-
LIS 8. YOUNG Administrative Judge Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals I certify that the foregoing is a true copy ofthe Order ofDismissal ofthe Armed Services Board ofContract Appeals in ASBCANo. 61857, Appeal ofOatridge Security Group, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter. Dated:

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS Recorder, Armed Services Board ofContractAppeals
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

VICTOR RODRIGUEZ,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

No. 04-5942

MEMORANDUM/ORDER

May 29, 2008. 

Petitioner’s Memorandum of Law in support of his motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 2255 has inadvertently been filed as a motion in the docket of this action. Civil No. 04-

5942, docket # 1. This filing is duplicative of the document filed as docket # 1021 in

Criminal No. 98-362-12. 

ACCORDINGLY, it is hereby ORDERED that the document filed as a motion in

this case, docket # 1, is hereby DISMISSED AS MOOT. 

 

BY THE COURT:

 

/s/ Louis H. Pollak

Pollak, J.

Case 2:04-cv-05942-LP Document 2 Filed 05/29/08 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 10.19
 EIGHTH AMENDMENT TO LOAN AGREEMENT
AND WAIVER
 Amendment Borrower Bank
  Loan
Agreement
     Conditions Precedent




---



##### 



Waiver Section 4.16(e) Section 4.16(e) Section 1 Section 4.16(e)
 Amendments
 The Loans Section 1.1
 Exemption from Dividends and Distributions Negative Covenant Section 4.14
 Section 4.14
 Total Capital Base Covenant Section 4.15
 Amendment to Financial Covenant Section 4.16(e)
  Additional Financial Covenant Section 4.16
   2




---



##### 



Additional Defined Term Section 4.16
 Total Loans and Leases
 Representations; No Default Unmatured Event of Default
 Reaffirmation of Pledge Agreement Loan Documents
 Affirmation, Further References
  3




---



##### 



Merger and Integration, Superseding Effect
 Severability
 Successors
 Costs and Expenses
 Headings
 Counterparts
 Governing Law
 No Waiver
 
  4




---



##### 



BORROWER:
    
    WESTERN RESERVE BANCORP, INC., 
an Ohio corporationBy:
    
    /s/ Edward J. McKeonPrinted Name:
    
    Edward J. McKeonIts:  President & CEOBy:
    
    /s/ Cynthia A. MahlPrinted Name:
    
    Cynthia A. MahlIts:   Executive Vice PresidentBANK:
    
    TCF NATIONAL BANK,
a national banking associationBy:
    
    /s/ John JagelsPrinted Name:
    
    John JagelsIts:  Vice PresidentBy:
    
    /s/ Guy J. RauPrinted Name:
    
    Guy J. RauIts:   Senior Vice President
  5
1

 The predicate for a discovery sanction is willful violation of an order to compel. Given

that the action is scheduled for arbitration on December 18, 2002, outstanding discovery is to

be completed forthwith.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

KATHY L. OAKES : CIVIL ACTION

:

 v. :

:

:

HENKELS and McCOY, et al. : No. 02-2749

ORDER

AND NOW, this day of December, 2002, plaintiff’s motion for

sanctions is denied as premature. 1

__________________________

Edmund V. Ludwig, J. 

Case 2:02-cv-02749-EL Document 45 Filed 12/16/2002 Page 1 of 1
# C_2017178EN.01002002.xml

| 6.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/20

---

Order of the General Court of 20 March 2017 — Kohrener Landmolkerei and DHG v Commission

(Case T-199/16) (1)

1

((Action for annulment - System of traditional specialities guaranteed - Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 - Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/304 - Time-limit for the forwarding of the notice of opposition to the Commission by the competent authorities - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law))

(2017/C 178/27)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Kohrener Landmolkerei GmbH (Penig, Germany) and DHG Deutsche Heumilchgesellschaft mbH (Frohburg, Germany) (represented by: A. Wagner, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially D. Triantafyllou, J. Guillem Carrau and J. Herkommer, and subsequently D. Triantafyllou and J. Herkommer, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/304 of 2 March 2016 entering a name in the register of traditional specialities guaranteed (Heumilch/Haymilk/Latte fieno/Lait de foin/Leche de heno (TSG)) (OJ 2016 L 58, p. 28).

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as manifestly lacking any foundation in law.

| 2. | Kohrener Landmolkerei GmbH and DHG Deutsche Heumilchgesellschaft mbH shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Kohrener Landmolkerei GmbH and DHG Deutsche Heumilchgesellschaft mbH shall bear their own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 232, 27.6.2016.

1

---
(b) (6)

(b) (6)


(b) (6)


(b) (6)
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AXT, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Donald L. Tatzin, as
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


August 12, 2002                           /s/ Donald L. Tatzin

                                              Donald L. Tatzin
                                              Chief Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

v. 

WILLIAM SOSA, 

a/k/a "King Homicide" 

CRIMINAL ACTION 

No. 05-044-1 

ORDER 

AND NOW, this 7th day of January, 2021, upon consideration of William Sosa's Motion 

for Modification of Sentence Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(l)(A)(i)(Doc. No. 1085), Mr. Sosa's 

Supplemental Filing (Doc. No. 1086), and the Government's Response in Opposition (Doc. No. 

1103), it is ORDERED that the Motion (Doc. No. 1085) is DENIED for the reasons set forth in 

the accompanying Memorandum. 

1 

Case 2:05-cr-00044-GEKP Document 1109 Filed 01/07/21 Page 1 of 1
# C_2018134EN.01001901.xml

| 16.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 134/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 134/19

---

Judgment of the General Court of 27 February 2018 — Hansen Medical v EUIPO — Covidien (MAGELLAN)

(Case T-222/16) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU word mark MAGELLAN - Genuine use - Burden of proof - Article 15 and Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 18 and Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Procedural irregularity committed by the Cancellation Division - Obligation to state reasons - Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 94 of Regulation 2017/1001) - Oral proceedings - Article 77 of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 96 of Regulation 2017/1001)))

(2018/C 134/25)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Hansen Medical, Inc. (Mountain View, California, United States) (represented by: R. Kunze, G. Würtenberger and T. Wittmann, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája and by D. Walicka, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Covidien AG (Neuhausen am Rheinfall, Switzerland) (represented by: R. Ingerl and D. Wiedemann, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 3 February 2016 (Cases R 3092/2014-2 and R 3118/2014-2), relating to revocation proceedings between Hansen Medical and Covidien.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Hansen Medical, Inc. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Hansen Medical, Inc. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 270, 25.7.2016.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001051885
<NAME> SCOVILL FASTENERS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           1,376
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,851
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,706
<INVENTORY>                                     18,191
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                35,590
<PP&E>                                          85,860
<DEPRECIATION>                                  26,855
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 192,512
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,864
<BONDS>                                        149,811
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       1,076
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   192,512
<SALES>                                         22,860
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                22,860
<CGS>                                           16,303
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   20,183
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 1,209
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    54
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               4,591
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,123)
<INCOME-TAX>                                        17
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,140)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,140)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

 

 

FELIX D. WHITTINGTON,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

DONALD VAUGHN, et al.,

 Defendants.

 CIVIL ACTION

 NO. 02-4346

JUDGMENT

AND NOW, this 3rd day of November, 2003, judgment is entered in FAVOR

of all defendants and AGAINST plaintiff.

BY THE COURT:

_________________________________

MARVIN KATZ, S.J.

Case 2:02-cv-04346-MK Document 96 Filed 11/03/2003 Page 1 of 1