alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(Reap. Dec. 10951)

#### C. J. Tower & Sons of Buffalo, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 14700, etc.

(Decided April 13, 1965)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement, enumerated in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, are before me for decision on a written stipulation reading as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the attorneys for the parties hereto, subject to approval by the court:

> That the merchandise covered by the appeals for reappraisement listed in Schedule A, hereto attached and made a part hereof, consists of electrical connectors for aircraft, similar in all material respects to the merchandise involved in *C. J. Tower & Sons of Buffalo, Inc.*v. *United States,*Reap. Dec. 10563; that the issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in said Reap. Dec. 10563, and that the record therein may be incorporated herein.

> That at the time of exportation of the merchandise listed in said Schedule A, the export value of said merchandise, as defined in Section 402(b), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, was as set forth in Schedule B, hereto attached and made a part hereof.

> That the appeals for reappraisement listed in said Schedule A are submitted for decision on the incorporated record and this stipulation.

*623On the agreed statement of facts and following our cited decision on the law, I find that the proper basis of appraisement for the merchandise in question, as hereinabove identified, is export value, as defined in section 402 (b), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and hold that such statutory value is as set forth in schedule B, hereto attached and made a part hereof.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
No. 61770.

#### Rayon Consultants, Inc., a/c Price I. Myers et al. *v.*United States,

protests 308228-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise, facts, and issues are the same in all material respects as those the subject of *B. J. Saunders & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(37 Cust. Ct. 267, C. D. 1834), the collector was directed to reliquidate the entries, assessing duty upon the basis of the unit appraised value per conditioned pound or kilo, multiplied by the total number of conditioned pounds or kilos, as set forth in the invoices.
-84 -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

38 40 42 44



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 1000 18 12 06 00 05/29 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 29 May 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.77 N 77.11 WMeters AGL
# C_2019103EN.01004202.xml

| 18.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 103/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 103/42

---

Order of the General Court of 30 January 2019 — Spliethoff’s Bevrachtingskantoor v Commission

(Case T-149/16) (1)

((Action for annulment - Financial assistance in the field of Connecting Europe Facility - Transport sector for the period 2014-2020 - Lis pendens - Inadmissibility))

(2019/C 103/57)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Spliethoff’s Bevrachtingskantoor BV (Amsterdam, the Netherlands) (represented by: initially by P. Glazener, then by Y. de Vries and D. Coumans and finally by Y. de Vries and J. de Kok, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Hottiaux and J. Samnadda, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Commission Implementing Decision C(2015) 5274 final of 31 July 2015 establishing the list of proposals selected for receiving EU financial assistance in the field of Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) — Transport sector following the calls for proposals launched on 11 September 2014 based on the Multi-Annual Work Programme.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as being inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as being inadmissible.

| 2. | Spliethoff’s Bevrachtingskantoor BV and the European Commission shall bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Spliethoff’s Bevrachtingskantoor BV and the European Commission shall bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 211, 13.6.2016.

---
# C_2019399EN.01003902.xml

| 25.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 399/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.11.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 399/39

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 September 2019 — Achemos Grupė and Achema v Commission

(Case T-417/16) (1)

(State aid - Aid to Klaipėdos Nafta for the construction and management of an LNG terminal at the Klaipėda Seaport - Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market - Article 106(2) TFEU - Article 107(3)(c) TFEU - Decision not to raise any objections - Security of supply - Service of general economic interest)

(2019/C 399/46)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Achemos Grupė UAB (Vilnius, Lithuania) and Achema AB (Jonava, Lithuania) (represented initially by R. Martens and C. Maczkovics, and subsequently by R. Martens and V. Ostrovskis, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: É. Gippini Fournier, N. Kuplewatzky and L. Armati, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Republic of Lithuania (represented initially by D. Kriaučiūnas and R. Dzikovič, and subsequently by R. Dzikovič, acting as Agents), Klaipėdos Nafta AB (Klaipėda, Lithuania) (represented by: K. Kačerauskas and V. Vaitkutė Pavan, lawyers)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Commission Decision C(2013) 7884 final of 20 November 2013, whereby State aid SA.36740 (2013/NN) granted by Lithuania to Klaipėdos Nafta was declared compatible with the internal market (OJ 2016, C 161, p. 1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Achemos Grupė UAB and Achema AB to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Achemos Grupė UAB and Achema AB to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;

| 3. | Orders the Republic of Lithuania and Klaipėdos Nafta AB to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Republic of Lithuania and Klaipėdos Nafta AB to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 371, 10.10.2016.

---
# C_2017022EN.01003501.xml

| 23.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/35

---

Order of the General Court of 28 November 2016 — SureID v EUIPO (SUREID)

(Case T-128/16) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Application for the EU word mark SUREID - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009 - Descriptive character - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law))

(2017/C 022/47)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: SureID, Inc. (Hillsboro, Oregon, United States) (represented by: B. Brandreth, Barrister)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral and S. Crabbe, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 January 2016 (Case R 1478/2015-4), relating to the application for registration of the word sign SUREID as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | SureID, Inc. shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

SureID, Inc. shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 175, 17.5.2016.

1

---
ARS HomeResearch

----

- National Programs
-  Office of Scientific Quality Review
- Office of International Research Engagement and Cooperation
- Search for an ARS project
- Search for an ARS scientific manuscript

| Datasets |
|----------|
|          |

The Agricultural Research Service programs generate many publicly accessible data products that are catalogued in Ag Data Commons. These databases, datasets, and data collections may be maintained by ARS or by ARS in cooperation with other organizations. 

Ag Data Commons is searchable for ARS specific and National Program specific datasets. Use the search to filter for:
    - "Agricultural Research Service" under "OMB Bureau Code" and 
    - The National Programs desired under "ARS National Program Number"

To submit datasets, please register for an account following instructions at Ag Data Commons User Guide.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 23.1 Consent of Independent Auditor

                    BAGELL, JOSEPHS, LEVINE & COMPANY, L.L.C.
                          Certified Public Accountants

                          406 Lippincott Drive, Ste. J
                         Marlton, New Jersey 08053-4168
                        (856) 346-2828 Fax (856) 396-0022



            CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


Global Resource Corporation
408 Bloomfield Drive, Unit 3
West Berlin, New Jersey 08091

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (No. 333-148916) of Global Resource Corporation of our
report dated March 20, 2008, relating to the consolidated financial statements,
which appear in this Form 10-KSB. Our report contains an explanatory paragraph
regarding the Corporation's ability to continue as a going concern.

/s/ Bagell, Josephs, Levine & Company, L.L.C.
Bagell, Josephs, Levine & Company, L.L.C.
Marlton, NJ 08053

March 26, 2008
Case 2:05-cv-00112-PBT Document 14 Filed 02/14/05 Page 1 of 1
No. 51609.

#### Protests 948379-G, etc., of Alexanders et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). In accordance therewith the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21

- 1689

FAUSTINO PEREZ

- CRUZ , Petitioner ,

v. MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General , Respondent

.

On Petition for Review of a n Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

.

Submitted : October 31, 2022 Decided: November 8, 2022

Before THACKER and HARRIS, Circuit Judges , and FLOYD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Petition denied by un published per curiam opinion

.

ON BRIEF: Arnedo S. Valera , LAW OFFICES OF VALERA & ASSOCIATES P.C., Fairfax, Virginia, for Petitioner. Brian M. Boynton, Acting Assistant Attorney General, Jennifer P. Levings, Assistant Director, James A. Hurley, Office of Immigratio n Litigation, Civil Division, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE , Washington, D.C, for Respondent.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. USCA4 Appeal: 21-1689 Doc: 26 Filed: 11/08/2022 Pg: 1 of 22 PER CURIAM:
Faustino Perez

- Cruz , a native and citizen of Mexico , petitions for review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (Board) dismissing his appeal from the Immigration Judge’s denial of his applications for withholding of removal and protection under the Convention Against Torture. We have thoroughly reviewed the record, inc luding the transcript of Perez

- Cruz ’s merits hearing and all supporting evidence. We conclude that the record evidence does not compel a ruling contrary to any of the agency’s factual findings, see 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(4)(B), and that substantial evidence s upports the Board’s decision, see Gomis v. Holder, 571 F.3d 353, 359 (4th Cir. 2009); Dankam v. Gonzales, 495 F.3d 113, 124 (4th Cir. 2007). Accordingly, we deny the petition for review for the reasons stated by the Board.
See In re Perez

- Cruz (B.I.A. M ay 20, 2021 ). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITION DENIED USCA4 Appeal: 21-1689 Doc: 26 Filed: 11/08/2022 Pg: 2 of 2
No. 60733.

#### Naumes Forwarding Service *v.*United States,

protests 229024-K/5047, etc. (Chicago).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that an allowance was made for gelatinous substance on certain canned hams and similar pork products equal to 10 percent of the contents of the tins, whereas there should have been an allowance of 20 percent, and that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that the subject of Abstract 60346. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the cited decision, the merchandise was held dutiable at 3)4 cents per pound under paragraph 703, Tariff Act of 1930, upon the basis of the net weight of the contents of the tins, less an allowance for gelatinous substance equal to 20 percent of the contents of each tin.
# C_2018042EN.01001702.xml

| 5.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 42/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 42/17

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 December 2017 — Martinez De Prins and Others v EEAS

(Case T-575/16) (1)

1

((Civil service - Officials - Agents - Remuneration - EEAS staff posted to a third country - Article 10 of Annex X to the Staff Regulations - Annual assessment of the allowance for living conditions - Decision to reduce the allowance for living conditions in Ghana from 25 % to 20 % - Plea of illegality))

(2018/C 042/24)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: David Martinez De Prins (Accra, Ghana) and the 9 other applicants whose names are annexed to the judgment (represented by: N. de Montigny and J.-N. Louis, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European External Action Service (represented by: S. Marquardt, acting as Agent, and M. Troncoso Ferrer, F.-M. Hislaire and S. Moya Izquierdo, lawyers)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application based on Article 270 TFEU seeking the annulment of the applicants’ salary statements of the month of March 2015 as well as their subsequent salary statements, to the extent that those statements apply the decision of the EEAS of 23 February 2015 to reduce, from 1 January 2015, the allowance for living conditions paid to EU staff posted to Ghana.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

| 1. | The salary statements of Mr David Martinez De Prins and the other officials and agents of the European External Action Service (EEAS) whose names are in annex established by the EEAS for the month of March 2015 are annulled to the extent that those statements apply the decision of the EEAS of 23 February 2015 to reduce, from 1 January 2015, the allowance for living conditions paid to EU staff posted to Ghana. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The salary statements of Mr David Martinez De Prins and the other officials and agents of the European External Action Service (EEAS) whose names are in annex established by the EEAS for the month of March 2015 are annulled to the extent that those statements apply the decision of the EEAS of 23 February 2015 to reduce, from 1 January 2015, the allowance for living conditions paid to EU staff posted to Ghana.

| 2. | The action is dismissed for the remainder. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The action is dismissed for the remainder.

| 3. | The EEAS is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The EEAS is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 111, 29.3.2016 (case initially registered before the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union under the number F-153/15 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1.9.2016).

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 216 (Thursday, November 9, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 77261-77262]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-24824]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[S-170-2023]


Approval of Subzone Expansion; Getinge Group Logistics Americas 
LLC; East Windsor, New Jersey

    On September 1, 2023, the Executive Secretary of the Foreign-Trade 
Zones (FTZ) Board docketed an application submitted by the Port 
Authority of New York and New Jersey, grantee of FTZ 49, requesting to 
expand Subzone 49W subject to the existing activation limit of FTZ 49, 
on behalf of Getinge Group Logistics Americas LLC, in East Windsor, New 
Jersey.
    The application was processed in accordance with the FTZ Act and 
Regulations, including notice in the Federal Register inviting public 
comment (88 FR 61499, September 7, 2023). The FTZ staff examiner 
reviewed the application and determined that it meets the criteria for 
approval. Pursuant to the authority delegated to the FTZ Board 
Executive Secretary (15 CFR 400.36(f)), the application to expand 
Subzone 49W was approved on November 6, 2023, subject to the FTZ

[[Page 77262]]

Act and the Board's regulations, including section 400.13, and further 
subject to FTZ 49's 2,000-acre activation limit.

    Dated: November 6, 2023.
Elizabeth Whiteman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-24824 Filed 11-8-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
#### TAXPAYERS FOR VINCENT, an unincorporated political association, and Candidates’ Outdoor Graphics Service (COGS) a California corporation, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. MEMBERS OF the CITY COUNCIL OF the CITY OF LOS ANGELES; and Edward D. Longley as Director of the Bureau of Street Maintenance for the City of Los Angeles, Defendants/Appellees.

No. 80-5686.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

July 20, 1984.

Wayne S. Canterbury, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiffs/appellants.

Anthony S. Alperin, Deputy City Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants/appellees.

Before NELSON and REINHARDT, Circuit Judges and EAST,* District Judge.

*

 The Honorable William G. East, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Oregon, sitting by designation.

On May 15, 1984, the Supreme Court reversed our judgment (682 F.2d 847) *see Members of the City Council of the City of Los Angeles et al. v. Taxpayers for Vincent et al.,*— U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 2118, 80 L.Ed.2d 772 (1984), and remanded the case to us. We therefore remand to the district court for action consistent with the Supreme Court opinion.
January 2024 to January 2025 Schedule

For Treasury-Disbursed Recurring Benefit Payments

Settlement Dates

Agency Jan’24 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan’25

OPM Office of Personnel Management

Civil Service Retirement/Annuity

1/2** 2/1 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/3** 7/1 8/1 9/3** 10/1 11/1 12/2** 1/2**

RRB Railroad Retirement Board 

Railroad Retirement/Annuity

1/2** 2/1 3/1 4/1 5/1 6/3** 7/1 8/1 9/3** 10/1 11/1 12/2** 1/2**

VA Department of Veterans Affairs

Compensation and Pension

12/29* 2/1 3/1 4/1 5/1 5/31* 7/1 8/1 8/30* 10/1 11/1 11/29* 12/31*

SSA Social Security Administration

3rd of Month

1/3 2/2* 3/1* 4/3 5/3 6/3 7/3 8/2* 9/3 10/3 11/1* 12/3 1/3

SSA 

Cycle -2 2nd Wednesday

1/10 2/14 3/13 4/10 5/8 6/12 7/10 8/14 9/11 10/9 11/13 12/11 1/8

SSA

Cycle -3 3rd Wednesday

1/17 2/21 3/20 4/17 5/15 6/18* 7/17 8/21 9/18 10/16 11/20 12/18 1/15

SSA

Cycle -4 4th Wednesday

1/24 2/28 3/27 4/24 5/22 6/26 7/24 8/28 9/25 10/23 11/27 12/24* 1/22

SSI 

Supplemental Security Income

12/29* 2/1 3/1 4/1 5/1 5/31* 7/1 8/1 8/30* 10/1 11/1 11/29* 12/31*

DOL-Black Lung

(Legacy Payments)

1/3 2/2* 3/1* 4/3 5/3 6/3 7/3 8/2* 9/3 10/3 11/1* 12/3 1/3

DOL – Black Lung

(New Enrollees)

1/12* 2/15 3/15 4/15 5/15 6/14* 7/15 8/15 9/13* 10/15 11/15 12/13* 1/15

.

* = Settlement Date Adjusted to the Preceding Business Day

** = Settlement Date Adjusted to the Following Business Day

Prepared by the U. S. Department of the Treasury/Bureau of the Fiscal Service January 2024
# C_2017277EN.01003902.xml

| 21.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 277/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 277/39

---

Judgment of the General Court of 4 July 2017 — Murphy v EUIPO — Nike Innovate (Electronic wristband)

(Case T-90/16) (1)

1

((Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered Community design representing an electronic wristband - Prior Community design - Ground for invalidity - Individual character - Different overall impression - Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Obligation to state reasons - Article 62 of Regulation No 6/2002))

(2017/C 277/58)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Thomas Murphy (Dublin, Ireland) (represented by: N. Travers, SC, J. Gormley, Barrister, and M. O’Connor, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Gája, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Nike Innovate CV (Beaverton, Oregon, United States) (represented by: C. Spintig, S. Pietzcker and M. Prasse, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 November 2015 (Case R 736/2014–3), relating to invalidity proceedings between Mr Murphy and Nike Innovate.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Thomas Murphy to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Thomas Murphy to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 156, 2.5.2016.

1

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : NOTICE OF APPEAL

V. : Cr. No. 04-00475-01

THOMAS EARL WILLIAMS, : HON. ANITA B. BRODY

 Defendant

NOTICE OF APPEAL

NOTICE is hereby given that THOMAS EARL WILLIAMS, defendant in the above

captioned case, hereby appeals to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit from

the Judgment of Sentence entered in this action on the 19 day of December, 2005. th

______________________________

HOWARD D. POPPER, 

Popper & Yatvin

230 South Broad Street, Suite 503

Philadelphia, PA 19102

(215) 546-5700

FAX (215) 546-5701

January 5, 2006

Case 2:04-cr-00475-AB Document 138 Filed 12/23/05 Page 1 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, : NOTICE OF APPEAL

V. : Cr. No. 04-00475-01

THOMAS EARL WILLIAMS, : HON. ANITA B. BRODY

 Defendant

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I do hereby certify that I have caused a copy of the foregoing Notice of Appeal to be

served on the following by First Class Mail, pre-paid:

Floyd J. Miller, Esquire 

Assistant United States Attorney

United States Attorney’s Office

615 Chestnut Street, Suite 1250

Philadelphia, PA 19106

Date: ___________ ______________________________

HOWARD D. POPPER

Popper & Yatvin

230 South Broad Street, Suite 503

Philadelphia, PA 19102

(215) 546-5700

FAX (215) 546-5701

Case 2:04-cr-00475-AB Document 138 Filed 12/23/05 Page 2 of 2