alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 35.2**

**SERVICER COMPLIANCE STATEMENT**

**Banc of America Card Servicing Corporation**

**BA Credit Card Trust**

The undersigned, a duly authorized officer of Banc of America Card Servicing Corporation ("BACSC"), as Subservicer (the "Subservicer") pursuant to the Amended and Restated Delegation of Servicing Agreement dated as of October 20, 2006 (the "Agreement") by and between FIA Card Services, National Association and BACSC, does hereby certify that:

| 1. | BACSC is Subservicer under the Agreement. |
|----|-------------------------------------------|

| 2. | A review of the Subservicer's activities during the period from and including July 1, 2008 through and including June 30, 2009 and of its performance under the Agreement has been made under my supervision. |
|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 3. | To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, BACSC has fulfilled all of its obligations in all material respects under the Agreement throughout such period. |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 17th day of September 2009.

 

| By:       /s/   Tim Huval                                  |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Name: Tim Huval

|   | Title: | Senior Vice President |
|--------|--------|-----------------------|
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

THE CHESTER COUNTY HOSPITAL : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. :

:

INDEPENDENCE BLUE CROSS, ET AL : NO. 02-2746

NOTICE OF HEARING

AND NOW, this 24th day of September, 2002, please take

note that a

[ ] preliminary pretrial conference 

[ ] final pretrial conference

[x] settlement conference

[ ] status conference

in the above-captioned case will be held on October 7, 2002 at

3:30 p.m. (Rescheduled from September 26, 2002) 

before the Honorable John R. Padova. This conference will be

held

[x] in chambers, Room 6614

[ ] by telephone* 

BY: 

 Gerrie M. Keane

 Deputy Clerk

cc: Lewis R. Olshin, Esquire

 Thomas A. Leonard, Esquire

 Arthur N. Lerner, Esquire

 Barbara H. Ryland, Esquire

 Howard T. Rosenblatt, Esquire

 James G. Kress, Esquire

 John Deq. Briggs, Esquire

 Kenneth W, Donnelly, Esquire

 Wayne A. Mack, Esquire

 Paul Diamond, Esquire

 Richard Feinstein, Esquire

 Daniel Kotchen, Esquire

 

Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 28 Filed 09/24/2002 Page 1 of 1
##### 



Exhibit 10.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

In connection with the annual report of Gemplus International S.A. (the
Company) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2002 (the Report),
I, Yves Guillaumot, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| |                                                                                                                                 
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 1.  the annual report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



| |                                                                                                                                                         
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | 2.  the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.

|                    |  |                                        
|------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------
|Date: July 15, 2003 |  |                                        
|                    |  | /s/    Yves Guillaumot                 
|                    |  |                                        
|                    |  | Yves Guillaumot
Chief Financial Officer

-196-
# C_2016260EN.01002902.xml

| 18.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 260/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 260/29

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein oikeus (Finland) lodged on 9 May 2016 — Finnair Oyj v Keskinäinen Vakuutusyhtiö Fennia

(Case C-258/16)

(2016/C 260/37)

Language of the case: Finnish

Referring court

Referring court

Korkein oikeus

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Finnair Oyj

Applicant:

Defendant: Keskinäinen Vakuutusyhtiö Fennia

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Is Article 31(4) of the Montreal Convention to be interpreted as meaning that, to preserve a right of action, it is necessary, in addition to giving notice of a complaint in due time, that the complaint be made in writing within the times provided for under Article 31(3)? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is Article 31(4) of the Montreal Convention to be interpreted as meaning that, to preserve a right of action, it is necessary, in addition to giving notice of a complaint in due time, that the complaint be made in writing within the times provided for under Article 31(3)?

| 2. | If, to preserve a right of action, a complaint must be made in writing in due time, is Article 31(3) of the Montreal Convention to be interpreted as meaning that the requirement of writing may be fulfilled in an electronic procedure and also by the registration of the damage in the information system of the carrier? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If, to preserve a right of action, a complaint must be made in writing in due time, is Article 31(3) of the Montreal Convention to be interpreted as meaning that the requirement of writing may be fulfilled in an electronic procedure and also by the registration of the damage in the information system of the carrier?

| 3. | Does the Montreal Convention preclude an interpretation by which the requirement of writing is regarded as fulfilled where, with the knowledge of the passenger, a representative of the carrier records in writing the notice of complaint/the complaint either on paper or electronically in the carrier’s system? |
| --- | --- |

3.

Does the Montreal Convention preclude an interpretation by which the requirement of writing is regarded as fulfilled where, with the knowledge of the passenger, a representative of the carrier records in writing the notice of complaint/the complaint either on paper or electronically in the carrier’s system?

| 4. | Does Article 31 of the Montreal Convention subject a complaint to further substantive requirements than that of giving notice to the carrier of the damage sustained? |
| --- | --- |

4.

Does Article 31 of the Montreal Convention subject a complaint to further substantive requirements than that of giving notice to the carrier of the damage sustained?

---
**Exhibit 31.1**

**Certification of the Chief Executive Officerpursuant to Rule 13A-14 or 15D-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.**

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and the Financial Statements of an Inactive Registrant, Regulation Section 210-3-11, the Registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized. 

 

I, Brad Brimhall, certify that:

> 
1. I have reviewed this June 30, 2005 annual report on Form 10-KSB    of Nevada Classic Thoroughbreds, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue    statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary    to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which    such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period  covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial    information included in this report, fairly present in all material    respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows    of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in  this report;

4. The other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing    and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in  Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant.

 

| Dated: July 25, 2005 | By: /s/ Brad Brimhall   |
|----------------------|-------------------------|
|                 |                         |
|                 | Brad Brimhall           |
|                 | Chief Executive Officer |

>
# C_2016068EN.01004001.xml

| 22.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 68/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 68/40

---

Action brought on 22 December 2015 — European Dynamics Luxembourg and Evropaïki Dynamiki v Commission

(Case T-752/15)

(2016/C 068/51)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Applicants: European Dynamics Luxembourg SA (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) and Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE (Athens, Greece) (represented by: M. Sfyri and C. Dede)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the General Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the European Commission of which they were notified by letter of 29 October 2015 under reference DIGIT/R/3/SDP/PT 5107460 (2015), by which the Commission ranked in sixth place the applicants’ tender for one of the three individual lots, specifically Lot 3, in the context of the open procurement procedure under No DIGIT/R3/PO/2015/0008 entitled ‘Support and consulting services for technical informatics staff IV (STIS IV)’; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the European Commission of which they were notified by letter of 29 October 2015 under reference DIGIT/R/3/SDP/PT 5107460 (2015), by which the Commission ranked in sixth place the applicants’ tender for one of the three individual lots, specifically Lot 3, in the context of the open procurement procedure under No DIGIT/R3/PO/2015/0008 entitled ‘Support and consulting services for technical informatics staff IV (STIS IV)’;

| — | order the Commission to compensate the applicants for the harm suffered by them in respect of the opportunity which they lost to be ranked in first place for Lot 3 of the framework agreement STIS IV; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to compensate the applicants for the harm suffered by them in respect of the opportunity which they lost to be ranked in first place for Lot 3 of the framework agreement STIS IV;

| — | order the Commission to pay all the costs of the applicants. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay all the costs of the applicants.

Pleas for annulment and main arguments

Pleas for annulment and main arguments

According to the applicants, the contested decision must be annulled as it provided a defective statement of reasons: (i) as regards the appraisal of the applicants’ technical offer, (ii) as regards the reasons for which the financial offers of the successful companies and consortia were not considered abnormally low, and on account of infringement by the Commission of the contractual documents and EU law in relation to the existence of manifest errors of assessment.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MARY LOUISE KELLY WOLFINGTON : CIVIL ACTION

and RICHARD I. WOLFINGTON :

 :

v. :

 :

DELAWARE RIVER PORT AUTHORITY :

OF PENNSYLVANIA AND NEW JERSEY, :

OFFICER THEODORE LOEBELL and :

OFFICER KENNETH MANNY : NO. 04-04655-JF

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Fullam, Sr. J. May 1, 2006

The motion for summary judgment filed on behalf of the

individual defendants, Loebell and Manny, will be denied for two

reasons: (1) the motion was filed too late, since the response is

not due until the date of trial; and, more important, (2) it is

obvious that there are disputed issues of material fact, and

summary disposition is not justified. 

An Order follows.

Case 2:04-cv-04655-JF Document 68 Filed 05/02/06 Page 1 of 2
2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MARY LOUISE KELLY WOLFINGTON : CIVIL ACTION

and RICHARD I. WOLFINGTON :

 :

v. :

 :

DELAWARE RIVER PORT AUTHORITY :

OF PENNSYLVANIA AND NEW JERSEY, :

OFFICER THEODORE LOEBELL and :

OFFICER KENNETH MANNY : NO. 04-04655-JF

ORDER

AND NOW, this 1st day of May 2006, upon consideration

of the motion for partial summary judgment filed on behalf of the

defendants Loebell and Manny, IT IS ORDERED:

That the motion is DENIED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ John P. Fullam 

John P. Fullam, Sr. J.

Case 2:04-cv-04655-JF Document 68 Filed 05/02/06 Page 2 of 2
# C_2017283EN.01005001.xml

| 28.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 283/50 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 283/50

---

Order of the General Court of 3 July 2017 — De Nicola v EIB

(Case T-666/16 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - EIB staff - Appraisal - Career development report - 2013 staff report - Application for annulment of the decision of the Appeals Committee and of the decision not to promote the applicant - Psychological harassment - Claim for damages))

(2017/C 283/77)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Carlo De Nicola (Strassen, Luxembourg) (represented by: G. Ferabecoli, lawyer)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Investment Bank (EIB) (represented by: T. Gilliams and G. Faedo, acting as Agents, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (Second Chamber) of 21 July 2016, De Nicola v EIB (F-100/15, EU:F:2016:167), seeking to have that judgment set aside.

De Nicola

EIB

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Mr Carlo De Nicola shall bear his own costs and shall pay those incurred by the European Investment Bank (EIB) in the present appeal. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Carlo De Nicola shall bear his own costs and shall pay those incurred by the European Investment Bank (EIB) in the present appeal.

---

(1)  OJ C 410, 7.11.2016.

1

---
Record of Contacts

 FDMS Docket No. FAA-2012-0146

 Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed?

Organization Person Contacted Date Response

Transport Canada Robert Farinas

(613) 952-4379

6/1/11 No Objections

Bombardier 

Aerospace

Kety Bussolo

(514) 855-5001

Ext. 60480

6/1/11 No Objections 

Regional Airline 

Association

Connie Arnold

202-367-1252

Arnold@raa.org

6/2/11 No Objections
# C_2019187EN.01006101.xml

| 3.6.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 187/61 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.6.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 187/61

---

Judgment of the General Court of 10 April 2019 — Jindal Saw and Jindal Saw Italia v Commission

(Case T-301/16) (1)

(Dumping - Imports of tubes and pipes of ductile cast iron originating in India - Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/388 - Regulation (EC) No 1255/2009 (replaced by Regulation (EU) 2016/1036) - Dumping margin - Determination of the export price - Association between an exporter and an importer - Reliable export price - Construction of the export price - Reasonable margin for selling, general and administrative costs - Reasonable margin for profit - Injury to the Union industry - Calculation of price undercutting and the injury margin - Causal link - Access to confidential data of the anti-dumping investigation - Rights of the defence)

(2019/C 187/65)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Jindal Saw Ltd (New Delhi, India), Jindal Saw Italia SpA (Trieste, Italy) (represented by: R. Antonini and E. Monard, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J.-F. Brakeland and G. Luengo, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Saint-Gobain Pam (Pont-à-Mousson, France) (represented by: O. Prost, A. Coelho Dias and C. Bouvarel, lawyers)

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/388 of 17 March 2016 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of tubes and pipes of ductile cast iron (also known as spheroidal graphite cast iron) originating in India (OJ 2016 L 73, p. 53), in so far as that regulation concerns the applicants.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/388 of 17 March 2016 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of tubes and pipes of ductile cast iron (also known as spheroidal graphite cast iron) originating in India, in so far as it concerns Jindal Saw Ltd; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/388 of 17 March 2016 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of tubes and pipes of ductile cast iron (also known as spheroidal graphite cast iron) originating in India, in so far as it concerns Jindal Saw Ltd;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by Jindal Saw and Jindal Saw Italia SpA; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by Jindal Saw and Jindal Saw Italia SpA;

| 3. | Orders Saint-Gobain Pam to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Saint-Gobain Pam to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 314, 29.8.2016.

---
Exhibit 14.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form F-3 No. 333-120202) and related prospectus pertaining to
the registration of up to U.S.$2,000,000,000 aggregate principal amount of debt securities of América Móvil, S.A. de C.V. and Radiomóvil Dipsa, S.A. de C.V., as guarantor, of our report dated February 25, 2005, except for
Note 20, as to which the date is March 9, 2005, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of América Móvil, S.A. de C.V. included in this Annual Report (Form 20-F) for the year ended December 31, 2004.



Mancera, S.C. A member firm of Ernst & Young Global/s/ Agustin Aguilar LaurentsC.P.C. Agustin Aguilar Laurents




Mexico City, Mexico

June 28, 2005
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             APR-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       7,077,751
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,465,451
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (295,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  1,036,180
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             9,861,953
<PP&E>                                         477,956
<DEPRECIATION>                               (157,868)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,083,106
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,058,647
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    12,063,414
<OTHER-SE>                                 (3,043,097)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,083,106
<SALES>                                      7,056,674
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             7,056,674
<CGS>                                        6,909,938
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  862,003
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               149,232
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 193
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (792,047)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (792,047)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (792,047)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.11)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.11)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>


EXHIBIT 32 (b)

 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                     906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northland Cable Television, Inc. and
Subsidiary (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Form 10-Q"), I, Gary Jones, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that;

            (1) The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
            (a) or (15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
            or 78(d)); and

            (2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents in
            all material respects, the financial condition and results of
            operations of the Company.

DATE: 11-14-05

/s/ GARY S. JONES
-------------------------
Gary S. Jones
President
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement will be retained by Northland Cable
Television, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
p.1 

OAR Box 1828 

Prepped by Ollie Stewart 

Document Number: 

58) ll-K- (B) -46 

Docket Number: 

A-83-27 

Printed 11/12/200811:12:50 AM Sheet 58 of 325 
P.2 

%\ _,

(0) 

II-K-(B)-46 

REVIEW OF PARTICULATE CONTROL COSTS - EEA LETTER DATED 

JULY 1, 1980. 

Letter from N.D. Noe, PEDCo, Inc. to J. Pratapas, 

EPArSASD. 

July 25, 1980. 

THIS INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND IN DOCKET A-79-02, ITEM 

II-K-(B)-46
Case 2:04-cv-04950-LDD Document 21-4 Filed 08/03/05 Page 1 of 6
Case 2:04-cv-04950-LDD Document 21-4 Filed 08/03/05 Page 2 of 6
Case 2:04-cv-04950-LDD Document 21-4 Filed 08/03/05 Page 3 of 6
Case 2:04-cv-04950-LDD Document 21-4 Filed 08/03/05 Page 4 of 6
Case 2:04-cv-04950-LDD Document 21-4 Filed 08/03/05 Page 5 of 6
Case 2:04-cv-04950-LDD Document 21-4 Filed 08/03/05 Page 6 of 6