alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
From: Cole, James (OST) 

Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 12:41 PM

To: Dockets Mail

Cc: Trottenberg, Polly (OST); Rivkin, Robert (OST); Jortland, Brett (OST)

Subject: OST Docket No. 2012-0147

On Thursday, March 7, 2012, Under Secretary Polly Trottenberg had a conversation with Denise 

Richardson and Chris Boylan of the Associated General Contractors of New York and 

representatives from two major construction firms relating to USDOT’s Notice of Proposed 

Rulemaking (NPRM) on “Disadvantaged Business Enterprise: Program Implementation 

Modifications.” The General Contractors expressed their concerns that their industry’s 

suggestions were not incorporated in the Department’s proposal and hoped that USDOT would 

seriously consider the comments that they and other representatives of the transportation 

construction industry submitted to the docket. They predicted that many of the NPRM’s 

proposed new requirements would, if adopted, prove infeasible, likely to add to the cost, time 

and complexity of major transportation projects, and potentially undermine rather than 

strengthen the participation of DBEs in the heavy construction industry. Ms. Trottenberg stated 

that the Department would carefully consider all the comments received on the NPRM.
No. 61735.

#### Intra Mar Transport Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 310500-K (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

The protest was dismissed.
Case 2:04-cr-00506-BMS Document 218 Filed 06/20/07 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:04-cr-00506-BMS Document 218 Filed 06/20/07 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:04-cr-00506-BMS Document 218 Filed 06/20/07 Page 3 of 3
Bureau of the Fiscal Service Printable Job Aid – Uninstall Development Treasury Root Certificate (Windows 7)

Last Updated on 09/23/2016 1

 Uninstall the Development Treasury Root Certificate (Windows 7)

To uninstall the Development Treasury Root Certificate, complete the following steps:

Application Tip

Having the Development Treasury Root Certificate installed on your 

computer is a potential security risk because this certificate will 

automatically validate websites and applications that contain Development 

Treasury digital signatures, including those that may not be approved by 

the Treasury. To ensure the highest level of security on your workstation, 

please uninstall the Development Treasury Root Certificate from your 

computer.

1. Right-click Development US Treasury Root CA in the Console 1 dialog box and 

click Delete.

Application Tip

The certificate deletion is successful if the certificate disappears from the 

list.
Bureau of the Fiscal Service Printable Job Aid – Uninstall Development Treasury Root Certificate (Windows 7)

Last Updated on 09/23/2016 2

2. The following Certificates message appears. Click Yes to confirm deletion.

3. Click Close (X button) to close the Console1 window.

4. The Microsoft Management Console message will appear. Click No to complete the 

uninstallation of the Development Treasury Root Certificate.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                          15,368
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,110
<ALLOWANCES>                                       245
<INVENTORY>                                     15,381
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                40,384
<PP&E>                                          30,301
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,344
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  65,341
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            8,093
<BONDS>                                          8,179
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            16
<OTHER-SE>                                      49,053
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    65,341
<SALES>                                         30,419
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                31,915
<CGS>                                           18,283
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   18,923
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,240
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   145
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 508
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  7,447
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,834
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              4,613
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,613
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .30
        

</TABLE>
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION In connection with the Quarterly Report of Midwest Banc Holdings, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on May 7, 2004 (the Report), the
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. /s/ Brad A. LueckeName:
    
    Brad A. LueckeTitle:
    
    President and
Chief Executive OfficerDate:
    
    May 7, 2004/s/ Daniel R. KadolphName:
    
    Daniel R. KadolphTitle:
    
    Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial OfficerDate:
    
    May 7, 2004
No. 66260.

#### Ross Products, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 60/30121 (New York).

*390Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of “Goofy Goony Birds” similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 65633, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
March 10, 2018

DNP Quick Reference Card

R E L E A S E 5 . 3

 Release Enhancements

 Added Adjudicate Multiple Payments 

Counts and Sorting Capability

 Whitelist Historical Details Retained and 

Headers Revised

 Production Fixes

 Known Bugs

Overview of Release

Release Enhancements

Adjudicate Multiple Payments Record Count

Description: Users will now see the total number of 

eligible matches displayed for multiple adjudication 

in both the Adjudicate Multiple Payments and the 

Confirm Adjudicate Multiple Payments screens. 

Note: When [Load More] is selected on the Adjudicate 

Multiple Payments screen, the total will include the 

newly loaded results.

Adjudicate Multiple Payments Selected Row 

Count

Description: Users will now see the number of matches 

selected in real time. This will help users identify when they 

are approaching the selection limit of 25 records that can be 

adjudicated at once.

Adjudicate Multiple Payments Column Sorting 

Description: Users will now be able to sort by most 

columns, making it easier to adjudicate in groups, based on 

required criteria. 

The following columns are now able to be sorted:

 Match Adjudication Status

 Data Sources

 Payment Type

 Payee Name

 SSN/EIN/TIN

 Payment Amount

 Payment Date

 Schedule #

 Payment ID

 Agency Location Code

 Agency Account ID
March 10, 2018

Release Enhancements (cont’d)

Whitelist Historical Details Headers

Description: Column headers have been changed to 

reflect more intuitive labels, identifying the user who 

created the record, and the date and time it was 

created.

Whitelist Historical Details Data

Description: When a user edited a Whitelist record, the 

Created By, Date Created, and Time Created fields in the 

Previous Details section incorrectly changed to the most 

current update, rather than retaining the original details. 

Now the original creator, date created, and time created 

of each record will be retained.

Previous Version New Version

Edited By Created By

Edited Date Date Created

Edited Time Time Created

Production Fixes

Missing Match Details for System for 

Award Management (SAM) Entity 

Registration Records 

Issue: When a user selected [Save/Print Results 

Summary + Selected Details] for a SAM Entity 

Registration Record through Online Search, the match 

details on the second page of the report were blank. 

Resolution: SAM Entity Registration Record match 

details now correctly display on the second page of 

the report. 

Known Bugs

Issue: With this release, users are now able to sort 

the columns in the Adjudicate Multiple Payments 

screen (see Release Enhancements section). 

Currently, the Portal will display up to 100 matches at 

one time. If the user sorts the first 100 matches, then 

selects [Load More], the intended sort will not remain 

for the newly loaded records.

Workaround: Load all matches first, then sort by the 

desired column. If you have already sorted and then 

load more matches, you will need to re-sort by the 

desired column.
March 8, 2012 

Mr. Steven Randall 

2833 Alnwick Avenue, Unit 13 

Livermore, CA 94551 

Dear Mr. Randall: 

We have received your January 24, 2012, letter and we have entered it into the public docket 

(No. FAA-2012-0122). 

On November 9, 2011, we sent you a letter requesting additional information that was 

missing from your original October 17, 2011, petition for exemption. Among other items, 

we had asked that you respond with the reasons why granting the request would be in the 

public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole. As we indicated in our 

November 9 letter, this information is required by 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 

11.81. We must have this information before we can consider your petition for exemption. 

The information you provided in your January 24, 2012, letter still does not address the 

public interest requirements of part 11, so we will take no further action on your petition. 

We have forwarded your correspondence to the FAA’s Airmen Certificate and Training 

Branch (AFS-810). They have committed to responding to your correspondence in writing 

as a general regulatory inquiry (rather than as a petition for exemption) within 30 days of the 

date of this letter. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

John W. McGraw 

Acting Director, Flight Standards 

 Service
In the Matter of: 

ORIGINAL 

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

Served: February 3, 2014 

FDMS No.: FAA-2013-0284 

RECEIVED 

FEB 1 4 2014 

HEARING DOCKET 

_A_v1_· a-=ti-"'on=-=E=n""gi=nc:..ee-'--r---'in...,g'--C-'--o=n=s-"u=lt'-"an"-'t"-'s,--"I=nc'-.---' Administrative Law Judge: J. E. Sullivan 

COMPLAINANT'S 

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL 

OF AMENDED COMPLAINT 

The Complainant in this matter, the Federal Aviation Administration, by counsel, hereby 

files its notice of withdrawal of its Amended Complaint filed on July 30,2013. This matter has 

been resolved through the timely payment on the party of the Respondent Company of an agreed 

upon civil penalty. 

WHEREFORE, the Complainant, by counsel, respectfully requests that the 

Administrative Law Judge enter an order terminating the proceedings in this matter for the 

reason stated herein. 

Dated this 3'ct day of February 2014 

Respectfully submitted, 

A. Lester Haizlip 

Regional Counsel 

By: 

Senior Enforcement Attorney 

Federal Aviation Administration 

901 Locust St., Room 506 

Kansas City, MO 64106-2641 

816-329-3765; Fax (816) 329-3771 

ATTORNEY FOR COMPLAINANT 
2 

In the Matter of Aviation Engineering Consultants, Inc. FDMS No. FAA-2013-0284 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 

I hereby certify that I have this date provided a copy of the FAA's Notice of Withdrawal 

oflts Amended Complaint via the methods listed below, to: 

Mr. Kamran Rouhani 

Aviation Engineering Consultants, Inc. 

2750 Sunset Point Road 

Clearwater, FL 33759 

(Copy via regular mail) 

Douglas J. Barnard, Esq. 

Plane Law 

14695 Airport Parkway, Suite 6 

Clearwater, FL 33762 

(Copy via regular mail) 

The Honorable J. E. Sullivan 

Administrative Law Judge 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Office of Hearings, M-20 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. 

Washington, DC 20590 

FAX: (202) 366-7536 

(Copy via fax; hard copy via regular mail) 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue, SW. 

Washington, DC 20591 

ATTN: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 

Wilbur Wright Building, Suite 2W1000 

(Original and one copy via regular mail) 

Dated this 3'd day of February 2014. 

. 

I /'~J 

. / "'f/ /f/};;/ 

ffi(l; /,1;' d. 

/ ;", ---- --

Mark taffiacho 

/Senior Enforcement Attorney 

!
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Neose Technologies, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, C. Boyd Clarke, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|/s/ C. Boyd Clarke                   
|-------------------------------------
|C. Boyd Clarke                       
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|                                     
|November 5, 2003
Attendee Report GoToWebinar

Webinar Name Webinar ID

ASRAC Commercial HVAC, CRE, and WH 

Working Group: Meeting and Webinar

640828352

Actual Start Date/Time Actual Duration (minutes) 

Jul 17, 2013 09:47 AM EDT 446

Total Attended

37

Session Details

First Name Last Name Email Country Address City State Organization Zip Code

Rodney Beever US 491 E. Princess St. York PA United CoolAir Corp. 17403

rick bostian US 5901 river oaks rd edmond OK WaterFurnace International 73013

Brice Bowley US GE APPLIANCE PARK LOUISVILLE KY GE 40225

Robert Brown US 9000 conservation Way Fort Wayne IN WaterFurnace International 46809

Joshua Cocciardi US 950 L'enfant plaza SW washington DC Dept. of Energy 20585

Stuart Dill US 801 Croporate Centre Dr. O'Fallon MO Schneider Electric 63368

Hank Edmunds US 5005 York Drive Norman OK Johnson Controls 73069

tim hammond US 9000 conservation way fort wayne IN WaterFurnace International 46809

brucw hierlmeier US 110 n oakridge dr north prairie WI zero zone 53153

Charles Hon US 2001 East Terra Lane O'Fallon MO True Manufacturing Co 63366-4434

Larry Howington US 1925 Ruffin Mill Road Colonial Heights VA AHRI 23834

Carl Huber US 9000 Conservation Way Fort Wayne IN WaterFurnace International, 

Inc.

46809

Brian Jeanes US 908 HWY 15 North New Albany MS Master-Bilt Products 38652

Jonathan Lemmond US 2111 Wilson Boulevard Arling VA AHRI 22201

John Mandyck US 1 Carrier Place Farmington CT United Technologies 06032

John McLaughlin US 4900 Tech Blvd Auburn NY Daikin McQuay 13021

Mark Menzer US 11112 Chessington Pl Reston VA Intertek 20194

Peter Molvie US 3232 W. Lancaster Ave. Milwaukee WI Cleaver-Brooks 53022

John Morris US 539 Dunksferry Bensalem PA Continental Refrigerator 19020

Frank Myers US 3209 Galvez Avenue Fort Worth TX PVI Industries, LLC 76111

Kathy Padfield US 800 A Beaty Street Davidson NC Ingersoll Rand - Trane 28036

General Information
David Ransom US 500 North Capitol Street NW Washington DC MWE 20001

wes roan US 1914 Randolph Dr. Bryan OH Bard Manufacturing Co., Inc. 43506

Carl Roberts US 1401 Grandview Av Oconomowoc WI Zero Zone, Inc 53066

Joe Sanders US 4401 Blue Mound Rd. Fort worth TX Traulsen 76106

Ron Shebik US 12999 St. Charles Rock Road Bridgeton MO Hussmann 63044

Louis Starr US 421 SW 6th Suite 600 Portland OR NEEA 97204

Eric Truskoski US 200 Lafayette St. Middleville MI Bradford White Corporation 49333

Mira Vowles US 901 NE 11th Ave, PEJD-1 Portland OR BPA 97232

Tom Walsh US 4900 Technology Prak Blvd Auburn NY Daikin McQuay 13021

kevin washington US 1250 conn ave nw washington DC itw 20036

Yoolanda Williams US AP2-121 Louisville KY General Electric 40225

Yoolanda Williams US AP2-121, Appliance Park Louisville KY General Electric 40225

Bruce Womack US 1725 Venice Circle Stockton CA brucesgreengardener 95206

Michael Woodford US 2111 Wilson Blvd., Suite # 500 Arlington VA AHRI 22201

Wes Wostal US 7300 SW 44th Street Oklahoma City OK ClimateMaster 73179

ed wuesthoff US 10001 reunion place, ste 500 san antonio TX Friedrich Air Conditioning Co. 

LTD

78216
SCPW-13-0000932

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

 

ANTHONY JOHNSON,

Petitioner,

vs.

MARIE LADERTA, WANDA CHONG-MENDONCA,

and ADMINISTRATIVE DIRECTOR OF THE COURTS,

Respondents.

 

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

(ADLRO CASE NOS. 12-07002, 13-01883)

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS AND/OR PROHIBITION

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Acoba, McKenna, and Pollack, JJ.)

Upon consideration of petitioner Anthony Johnson’s

petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition, filed on May

17, 2013, and the documents attached thereto and submitted in

support thereof, it appears that petitioner’s license was revoked

at the time of his April 11, 2013 arrest (ADLRO No. 13-01883)

and, therefore, he did not have a clear and indisputable right to

an ignition interlock permit in ADLRO No. 13-01883. See HRS §

291E-44.5(b)(1) (Supp. 2012). In addition, petitioner has

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCPW-13-0000932

24-JUN-2013

10:23 AM
alternative means to obtain the requested relief. See Kema v.

Gaddis, 91 Hawai#i 200, 204, 982 P.2d 334, 338 (1999) (a writ of

mandamus and/or a writ of prohibition is an extraordinary remedy

that will not issue unless the petitioner demonstrates a clear

and indisputable right to relief and a lack of alternative means

to redress adequately the alleged wrong or obtain the requested

action); State ex rel. Marsland v. Ames, 71 Haw. 304, 306, 788

P.2d 1281, 1283 (1990) (“[T]he mere fact that other remedies are

not available has never in itself been sufficient justification

for [a writ].”); Barnett v. Broderick, 84 Hawai#i 109, 111, 929

P.2d 1359, 1361 (1996) (mandamus relief is available to compel an

official to perform a duty allegedly owed to an individual only

if the individual’s claim is clear and certain, the official’s

duty is ministerial and so plainly prescribed as to be free from

doubt, and no other remedy is available). Accordingly, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petition for a writ of

mandamus and/or prohibition is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, June 24, 2013.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Simeon R. Acoba, Jr.

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack
**Exhibit23.1**

 

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’CONSENT

 

Weconsent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement on FormS-3, File No. 333-111412 of General Maritime Corporation andsubsidiaries of our report dated February 27, 2004, appearing in the AnnualReport on Form 10-K of General Maritime Corporation and subsidiaries for theyear ended December 31, 2003 and to the reference to us under the heading“Experts” in the Prospectus, which is part of this Registration Statement.

 
| /s/ DELOITTE &  TOUCHE LLP |   |
|--------------------------------|--------|

 

New York, New York

March 12, 2004

 

----
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Anthony Whitehurst v. Sybil Thomas

Appellate case number: 01

- 21

- 0 0 309

- C V

Trial court case number: 1167394

Trial court: County Civil Court at Law No. 4 of Harris County

On January 28 , 202 2

, appellant filed a motion to stay the time period for filing his brief, noting that he has not received copies of the reporter’s records that he previously requested. We interpret appellant’s motion as an extension of time to file appellant’s brief.

See T EX

. R. A PP . 10.5(b). Accordingly, the Clerk of this Court is directed to send to appellant a copy of volume s one and two of the reporter’s record filed on September 3,

2021. We further grant’s appellant’s motion and order that appellant’s brief is due to be

filed on April 9, 2022

. See T EX

. R. A PP . 38.6(d).

It is so ORDERED

.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Sherry Radack

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: __ March 3, 2022

____
Exhibit 8.
List of Significant Subsidiaries
The following table sets forth our significant direct and indirect subsidiaries as of June 2, 2005.   **Name of Company**  GemplusIndustrial de Mexico S.A. de C.V., a Mexican corporation  Gemplus Corp., a Delaware (U.S.) corporation  Gemplus Finance S.A., a Luxembourg corporation  Gemplus GmbH, a German corporation  Gemplus Limited, a British corporation  Gemplus Japan Co Ltd, a Japanese corporation  Gemplus Microelectronics Asia Pte Limited, a Singapore corporation  Gemplus S.A., a French corporation  Gemplus Tianjin New Technologies Company Limited, a Chinese corporation  Gemplus Pologne S.P.Z.o.o., a Polish corporation  GoldpacSecurCard Zhuhai Co Ltd, a Chinese corporation  Setec Oy, a Finnish corporation  Tianjin Gemplus Smart Card Company Limited, a Chinese corporation
# C_2017249EN.01002502.xml

| 31.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 249/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 249/25

---

Judgment of the General Court of 8 June 2017 — Commission v IEM

(Case T-141/16) (1)

((Arbitration clause - Contract FAIR-CT98-9544 concluded under the Fourth Framework programme for research, technological development and demonstration activities (1994-1998) - Termination of the contract - Reimbursement of sums advanced - Default interest - Default procedure))

(2017/C 249/38)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: A. Katsimerou and S. Lejeune, acting as Agents, and O. Lytra, lawyer)

Defendant: IEM — Erga — Erevnes — Meletes perivallontos kai chorotaxias AE (Athens, Greece)

Re:

Action on the basis of Article 272 TFEU seeking an order that IEM — Erga — Erevnes — Meletes perivallontos kai chorotaxias AE reimburse the advances paid by the European Commission in relation to contract FAIR-CT98-9544, together with default interest.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Orders IEM — Erga — Erevnes — Meletes perivallontos kai chorotaxias AE to pay the sum of EUR 75 728,33 to the European Commission, together with default interest at the rate of 3 % to run from 4 September 2010 until payment in full; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Orders IEM — Erga — Erevnes — Meletes perivallontos kai chorotaxias AE to pay the sum of EUR 75 728,33 to the European Commission, together with default interest at the rate of 3 % to run from 4 September 2010 until payment in full;

| 2. | Orders IEM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders IEM to pay the costs.

---

(1)  
  OJ C 191, 30.5.2016.

---