alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

HIMES, ET AL. : CIVIL ACTION

:

 v. :

:

HOME DEPOT, INC., ET AL. : NO. 02-CV-2774

ORDER

AND NOW, this day of July 2002, it is ORDERED that the management

track of this case shall be changed from "ARBITRATION" to "STANDARD." The Clerk shall

modify the docket accordingly.

BY THE COURT:

______________________________

Berle M. Schiller, J.

Case 2:02-cv-02774-BMS Document 9 Filed 07/12/2002 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

SANDRA K. FRABLE, )

 ) Civil Action

Plaintiff ) No. 05-CV-00402

 )

vs. )

 )

CHRISTMAS CITY HOTEL, LLC, )

trading as )

Radisson Hotel Bethlehem, )

 )

Defendant )

O R D E R

NOW, this 24th day of August, 2006, upon consideration

of plaintiff’s Motion for Relief from Judgment or Order Pursuant

to F.R.C.P. 60(b), which motion was filed November 9, 2005; upon

consideration of the Order dated March 23, 2006 from the United

States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit remanding this case

to the undersigned to dispose of plaintiff’s within motion; upon

consideration of the briefs of the parties; and for the reasons

articulated in the accompanying Memorandum, 

IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff’s Motion for Relief from

Judgment or Order Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 60(b) is granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Order of the undersigned

dated September 28, 2005 is vacated.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Opinion of the

undersigned accompanying the vacated Order is withdrawn.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Counts I and II of

plaintiff’s Complaint are reinstated.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant is granted leave

to file either an answer to plaintiff’s Complaint or a

supplemental motion to dismiss the Complaint, which answer or

Case 2:05-cv-00402-JKG Document 26 Filed 08/24/06 Page 1 of 2
-iisupplemental motion shall be filed within 20 days of the date of

any mandate of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third

Circuit which remands this entire case back to this court for all

purposes. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court for the

United States District Court for the Eastern District of

Pennsylvania shall immediately transmit a copy of this Order and

the accompanying Memorandum to the United States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ JAMES KNOLL GARDNER 

James Knoll Gardner

United States District Judge

Case 2:05-cv-00402-JKG Document 26 Filed 08/24/06 Page 2 of 2
******SEARCH the Tax Division OnlineFiles**U.S. Department of JusticeTax DivisionCriminal Enforcement Sections                                                                       Table of Contents      Table of Cases**CRIMINAL TAX MANUAL***1 9 9 4***LORETTA C. ARGRETT**Assistant Attorney GeneralTax Division**MARK E. MATTHEWS**Deputy Assistant Attorney GeneralTax DivisionEditor-in-Chief:**ROBERT E. LINDSAY**Chief, Criminal Appeals & Tax Enforcement, Policy SectionTax DivisionTitle Page ||Table of Contents || Detailed Table of Contents ||Table of Cases ||Trial of a Criminal Tax Case || Model Jury Instructions || Indictment & Information Forms ||     

Uploaded December 15, 1997********
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

FELIX WHITTINGTON, :

 Plaintiff : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. :

:

DONALD VAUGHN, et al. :

Defendants : No. 02-CV-4346 

ORDER

AND NOW, this day of 2003, it is ORDERED that counsel

for Defendants Vaughn, Diguglielmo, Feild, Buzzer, Smith and Canino,

is permitted to take the deposition of plaintiff Felix Whittington, Inmate No. AY4935, an inmate currently in the custody of the Pennsylvania Department of

Corrections. Said deposition shall take place, pursuant to written notice, at the

correctional institution at which plaintiff is incarcerated, and may, at defense

counsel’s option, be taken either in person, by telephone, or by video.

BY THE COURT:

 

MARVIN KATZ, S.J.

Case 2:02-cv-04346-MK Document 87 Filed 07/10/2003 Page 1 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

FELIX WHITTINGTON, :

 Plaintiff : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. :

:

DONALD VAUGHN, et al. :

Defendants : No. 02-CV-4346 

DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DEPOSE PRISONER

Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(a)(2), Defendants Vaughn, Diguglielmo, Feild,

Buzzer, Smith and Canino, by their counsel, Edward C. Wright, Deputy Attorney

General, hereby request leave of court to take the deposition of plaintiff Felix

Whittington, Inmate No. AY-4935, presently in the custody of the Pennsylvania

Department of Corrections. The Defendants request leave to take plaintiff’s

deposition either in person at the correctional institution at which plaintiff is

presently incarcerated, or by telephone, or by video.

WHEREFORE, it is respectfully requested that the Defendants’ Motion to

Depose Prisoner be granted. 

Respectfully submitted,

D. MICHAEL FISHER

ATTORNEY GENERAL

 BY: 

Edward C. Wright

Deputy Attorney General

Identification No. 67192

OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL

21 S. 12th Street, 3rd Floor

Philadelphia, PA 19107-3603

Telephone: (215) 560-2141

Case 2:02-cv-04346-MK Document 87 Filed 07/10/2003 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Edward C. Wright, Deputy Attorney General, hereby certify that a true

and correct copy of Defendants’ Motion to Depose Prisoner was mailed on July 10,

2003, by First Class Mail, postage prepaid, to:

Felix Whittington

 #AY-4935

SCI-Greene

175 Progress Drive

Waynesburg, PA 15370

 D. MICHAEL FISHER

 ATTORNEY GENERAL

 BY: 

 Edward C. Wright

 Deputy Attorney General

 Identification No. 67192

OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL

21 S. 12th Street, 3rd Floor

Philadelphia, PA 19107-3603

Telephone: (215) 560-2141

Case 2:02-cv-04346-MK Document 87 Filed 07/10/2003 Page 3 of 3
# C_2017022EN.01000302.xml

| 23.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/3

---

Appeal brought on 26 September 2016 by Francisco Javier Rosa Rodríguez against the order of the General Court (Fifth Chamber) made on 20 July 2016 in Case T-358/16 Rosa Rodríguez v Consejería de Educación de la Junta de Andalucía

Rosa Rodríguez

Consejería de Educación de la Junta de Andalucía

(Case C-509/16 P)

(2017/C 022/05)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Francisco Javier Rosa Rodríguez (represented by: J. Velasco Velasco, abogado)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Consejería de Educación de la Junta de Andalucía

Other party to the proceedings:

By order of 8 December 2016, the Court of Justice (Ninth Chamber) dismissed the appeal and ordered Mr Rosa Rodríguez to bear his own costs.

---
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 220 (Thursday, November 16, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 78727-78728]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-25357]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[RTID 0648-XD527]


Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council (MAFMC); Public Meeting

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice; public meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council's Summer Flounder, 
Scup, and Black Sea Bass Advisory Panel will hold a public meeting.

DATES: The meeting will be held on Monday, December 4, 2023, from 3 
p.m. until 6 p.m. For agenda details, see SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held via webinar. Connection information 
will be posted prior to the meeting at www.mafmc.org.
    Council address: Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 800 N 
State Street, Suite 201, Dover, DE 19901; telephone: (302) 674-2331; 
website: www.mafmc.org.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher M. Moore, Ph.D., Executive 
Director, Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council, telephone: (302) 
526-5255.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Summer Flounder, Scup, and Black Sea 
Bass Advisory Panel will meet to review and provided feedback on the 
Monitoring Committee's recommendations for 2024-2025 recreational 
management measures for summer flounder and scup and 2024 recreational 
management measures for black sea bass. The Advisory Panel will also 
receive a brief update on the Recreational Measures Setting Process 
Framework/Addenda. Additionally, the Advisory Panel will review recent 
analysis and stakeholder input on the commercial summer flounder 
minimum mesh regulations and exemptions (i.e., minimum mesh size 
regulations, Small Mesh Exemption Program, and the flynet exemption), 
and provide feedback and recommendations on these issues. Input 
provided by the Advisory Panel will be considered during the December 
2023 joint meeting of the Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council and 
the Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission's Summer Flounder, 
Scup, and Black Sea Bass Management Board.

[[Page 78728]]

Special Accommodations

    The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for sign language interpretation or other auxiliary aid should 
be directed to Shelley Spedden, (302) 526-5251, at least 5 days prior 
to the meeting date.
    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: November 13, 2023.
Rey Israel Marquez,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National 
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2023-25357 Filed 11-15-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
# C_2017195EN.01000702.xml

| 19.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 195/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 195/7

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Salerno (Italy) lodged on 16 November 2016 — Criminal proceedings against Nicola Turco

(Case C-581/16)

(2017/C 195/10)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunale di Salerno

Party to the main proceedings

Party to the main proceedings

Nicola Turco

By order of 4 April 2017 the Court (Seventh Chamber) held that:

| 1. | Articles 49 and 56 TFEU and the principles of equal treatment and effectiveness must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation on betting and gaming, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which provides for the organisation of a new call for tenders for the award of licences with a shorter period of validity than that of the licences awarded in the past on account of the reorganisation of the system through the alignment of licence expiry dates. |
| --- | --- |

1.

Articles 49 and 56 TFEU and the principles of equal treatment and effectiveness must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation on betting and gaming, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which provides for the organisation of a new call for tenders for the award of licences with a shorter period of validity than that of the licences awarded in the past on account of the reorganisation of the system through the alignment of licence expiry dates.

| 2. | Articles 49 and 56 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding a restrictive national provision, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which requires a licensee of a betting and gambling service to transfer, free of charge, on the cessation of business as a result of the expiry of the final term of the licence, the rights to use tangible and intangible assets which he owns and which constitute his network for the management and collection of bets, in so far as that restriction goes beyond what is necessary to attain the objective actually pursued by that provision, which is for the referring court to verify. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Articles 49 and 56 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding a restrictive national provision, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which requires a licensee of a betting and gambling service to transfer, free of charge, on the cessation of business as a result of the expiry of the final term of the licence, the rights to use tangible and intangible assets which he owns and which constitute his network for the management and collection of bets, in so far as that restriction goes beyond what is necessary to attain the objective actually pursued by that provision, which is for the referring court to verify.

---
### -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

36 38 40 

## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 06/19 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 19 Jun 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.44 N 77.04 WMeters AGL 

## ★

■ ■ ■ ■



## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★
● ● ● ● 

## ★ ● ● ● ●
EXHIBIT 32.2

                  CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 200

2
In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of RTG Ventures, Inc. (the
"Company") for the annual period ended August 31, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Barrington Fludgate, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) of
          15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: May 15, 2007                             /s/ Barrington Fludgate
                                               ---------------------------------
                                               Barrington Fludgate, Chief
                                               Financial Officer (Principal
                                               Accounting Officer)
Before the Second Division,

April 23, 1968

No. P68/215.

protests 64/15281 (B), etc. (Los Angeles).

#### Torch Mfg. Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of batteries, classified as entireties with flashlights, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Torch Mfg. Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(57 Cust. Ct. 521, C.D 2863), wherein the court held that the flashlights and batteries were separate entities rather than an entirety and were separately dutiable, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                         6,880,606
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                     149,808
<MORTGAGE>                                     486,722
<REAL-ESTATE>                                    7,590
<TOTAL-INVEST>                               7,962,346
<CASH>                                         458,006
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                               2,071
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                         382,709
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              11,560,542
<POLICY-LOSSES>                              7,637,034
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                   5,594
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                          323,236
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                197,745
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          197,691
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        30,005
<OTHER-SE>                                     755,542
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                11,560,542
<PREMIUMS>                                     130,831
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                            435,984
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                               (876)
<OTHER-INCOME>                                  22,672
<BENEFITS>                                     330,487
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                     56,320
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                           100,584
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 91,579
<INCOME-TAX>                                    36,756
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             33,146
<DISCONTINUED>                                     655
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    33,801
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.89
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.88
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0


</TABLE>
November 26, 1952

No. 56952.

#### Oxford University Press, New York, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 94630-K.

C. D. 1467. Plaintiff’s application for rehearing granted.
No. 63559.

protests 59/5307(B), etc. (Los Angeles).

#### Adrian Taron et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

The protests were dismissed.
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket No. 38673

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

DEREK DEAN HOLDER,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

2012 Unpublished Opinion No. 434

Filed: April 4, 2012

Stephen W. Kenyon, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED 

OPINION AND SHALL NOT 

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the Second Judicial District, State of Idaho, Nez 

Perce County. Hon. Carl B. Kerrick, District Judge. 

Judgment of conviction and unified sentence of twenty-five years, with a 

minimum period of confinement of seven years, for lewd conduct with a minor 

under sixteen, affirmed.

Sara B. Thomas, State Appellate Public Defender; Spencer J. Hahn, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Lori A. Fleming, Deputy Attorney 

General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before LANSING, Judge; GUTIERREZ, Judge;

and MELANSON, Judge

PER CURIAM

Derek Dean Holder was convicted of lewd conduct with a minor under sixteen, Idaho 

Code § 18-1508. The district court sentenced Holder to a unified term of twenty-five years, with 

a minimum period of confinement of seven years. Pursuant to a petition for post-conviction relief, 

the district court vacated and reentered the judgment. Holder appeals, contending that his sentence 

is excessive.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established and 

need not be repeated here. See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-
2

15 (Ct. App. 1991); State v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 

1984); State v. Toohill, 103 Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing 

the length of a sentence, we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 

722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record 

in this case, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion.

Therefore, Holder’s judgment of conviction and sentence are affirmed.
Case 2:05-cv-00112-PBT Document 9 Filed 02/14/05 Page 1 of 1
SERVED: MAY 22,2014
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATTER OF SPIRIT AVIONICS, LTD. DOCKETNO. FAA-2014-0119 (Civil Penalty Action)

NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT OF PROCEEDING This proceeding (heretofore designated as CaseNo. 2012-GL-07-0056) has been assigned to Administrative LawJudge J.E. Sullivan. All future pleadings and other communicationsregarding this proceeding shall be served onthe Judge, the FAAHearing

Attachment

- Service List

### SERVICE LIST- BY U.S. 

### MAIL ORIGINAL & ONE COPY 

### Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC--430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite2W1000 1 ONE COPY 

### Jerry A. Eichenberger, Respondent's Counsel 

### EICHENBERGER & ASSOCIATES 6037 Frantz Road, Suite 107 Dublin, OH 43017 TEL: 614-798-1600 FAJ(: 614-798-1620 Kate Barber, Complainant's Counsel 

### Federal Aviation Administration, AGL-7 2300 East Devon Avenue Des Plaines, IL 60018-4696 TEL: 847-294-7862 FAJ(: 847-294:..7498 Hon. J.E. Sullivan,AdministrativeLawJudge 

### Office ofHearings; M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. (E11-310) Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-6941 FAJ(: 202-366-7536 DocketNo. FAA-2014-0119 (Civil Penalty Action)

1 Service wasby U.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2WIOOO, Washington, DC 20591; Attention: Hearing DocketClerk, AGC-430. 

### -2-