alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2019383EN.01005701.xml

| 11.11.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 383/57 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.11.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 383/57

---

Judgment of the General Court of 10 September 2019 — Poland v Commission

(Case T-883/16) (1)

(Internal market in natural gas - Directive 2009/73/EC - Commission Decision approving the variation of the conditions for the exemption from EU requirements of the rules governing the operation of the OPAL pipeline with regard to third party access and tariff regulation - Article 36(1) of Directive 2009/73 - Principle of energy solidarity)

(2019/C 383/64)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Applicant: Republic of Poland (represented by: B. Majczyna, K. Rudzińska and M. Kawnik, acting as Agents)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: O. Beynet and K. Herrmann, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the applicants: Republic of Latvia (represented by: I. Kucina, G. Bambāne and V. Soņeca, Agents), and by Republic of Lithuania, (represented: initially by D. Kriaučiūnas, R. Dzikovič and R. Krasuckaitė, and subsequently by R. Dzikovič, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented: initially by T. Henze and R. Kanitz, and subsequently by R. Kanitz, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Commission Decision C(2016) 6950 final of 28 October 2016 on the review of the conditions for exemption of the OPAL pipeline, granted under Directive 2003/55/EC, from the rules on third party access and tariff regulation.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Commission Decision C(2016) 6950 final of 28 October 2016 on the review of the conditions for exemption of the OPAL pipeline, granted under Directive 2003/55/EC, from the rules on third party access and tariff regulation; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Commission Decision C(2016) 6950 final of 28 October 2016 on the review of the conditions for exemption of the OPAL pipeline, granted under Directive 2003/55/EC, from the rules on third party access and tariff regulation;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and those incurred by the Republic of Poland; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and those incurred by the Republic of Poland;

| 3. | Orders the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Latvia and the Republic of Lithuania to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Federal Republic of Germany, the Republic of Latvia and the Republic of Lithuania to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 38, 6.2.2017.

---
December 18, 2014 

Office of the Chief Counsel 

Attention: FAA Part 16 Docket Clerk, AGC-600 

Federal Aviation Administration 

800 Independence Avenue S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20591 

THE PORT AUTHORITY OF NY & NJ 

Darrell Buchbinder, General Counsel 

Re: United Airlines, Inc. v. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey 

(Docket FAA-16-14-.A:l_) 

Ladies and Gentlemen: 

The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, operator and airport sponsor of Newark Liberty 

International Airport, has been served with the Complaint filed against it by United Airlines under the 14 

C.F.R. Part 16. The filing is a flagrant abuse of the Part 16 process that ignores longstanding precedent in 

this area when the relationship of the parties is governed by an agreement. As such, the Port Authority 

will be filing a motion seeking dismissal of the Complaint, in its entirety, with prejudice, pursuant to and 

within the time permitted by the applicable Rules of Practice for these proceedings. 

Respectfully, 

(;j~ 1/ .. (J& ~;> 

Carlene V. Mcintyre 

Assistant General Counsel 

Port Authority of New York and New Jersey 

cc: Keith J. Harrison 

Gerald F. Murphy 

Stephen J. Seiden 

Crowell & Moring LLP 

1001 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20004 

RobertS. Span 

Alan K. Steinbrecher 

Sophy Chen 

Steinbrecher & Span LLP 

1155 F Street, N.W. Suite 1050 

Washington, D.C. 20004 

/.?5 Pork Avenue South 

New J\JY 70005
EXHIBIT 32.1

STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

The undersigned, Dwayne Powell, is the President and Chief Executive Officer of Pocahontas Bancorp, Inc. (the Company).

This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the Company of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 (the Report).

By execution of this statement, I certify that:



| | A) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | B) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods covered by the Report.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this statement
will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that this statement be deemed
to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



|                |  |  |  |                  
|--------------- |  |  |  | -----------------
|August 11, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ Dwayne Powell
|Dated           |  |  |  | Dwayne Powell
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET OF HORIZON OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
AS OF MARCH 31, 1998 AND THE RELATED UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1998
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                             134
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,165
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                16,842
<PP&E>                                          71,270
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (1,686)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  88,972
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           21,756
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,369
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,285
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    88,972
<SALES>                                         18,611
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,611
<CGS>                                           13,227
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    1,939
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 801
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,644
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,644
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,644
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .19
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .19
        

</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1329 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1329

 To amend title 31, United States Code, to permit the Secretary of the 
  Treasury to locate and recover certain assets of the United States 
                              Government.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              June 8, 2017

  Mrs. Fischer (for herself and Mr. Manchin) introduced the following 
  bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 31, United States Code, to permit the Secretary of the 
  Treasury to locate and recover certain assets of the United States 
                              Government.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``REcovering and COllecting Unclaimed 
federal Property Act of 2017'' or the ``RECOUP Act''.

SEC. 2. INCREASE AND STREAMLINE RECOVERY OF UNCLAIMED ASSETS OWED TO 
              THE UNITED STATES.

    Section 3711 of title 31, United States Code, is amended by adding 
at the end the following:
    ``(j)(1) The Secretary of the Treasury (referred to in this 
subsection as the ``Secretary'') may locate and recover assets of the 
United States Government on behalf of any executive, judicial, or 
legislative agency in accordance with such procedures as the Secretary 
considers appropriate.
    ``(2) Notwithstanding any other provision of law concerning the 
depositing or collection of Federal payments, including section 
3302(b), the Secretary may retain a portion of the amounts recovered 
under this subsection to cover the administrative and operational costs 
of the Secretary associated with locating and recovering assets of the 
United States Government.
    ``(3) The Secretary shall use any funds appropriated to the 
Secretary to carry out this subsection.
    ``(4) Any savings associated with carrying out this subsection 
shall be transferred to the general fund of the Treasury for the 
purpose of deficit reduction.''.
                                 <all>
```
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1167 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1167

To require the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to 
   evaluate and consider revising regulations relating to emergency 
         medical equipment requirements for passenger aircraft.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 17, 2017

 Mr. Schatz (for himself and Mr. Moran) introduced the following bill; 
    which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To require the Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration to 
   evaluate and consider revising regulations relating to emergency 
         medical equipment requirements for passenger aircraft.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Airplane Kids In Transit Safety Act 
of 2017'' or the ``Airplane KITS Act''.

SEC. 2. EMERGENCY MEDICAL EQUIPMENT ON PASSENGER AIRCRAFT.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 1 year after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Administrator of the Federal Aviation 
Administration shall evaluate and revise, as appropriate, the 
regulations under part 121 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, 
regarding the emergency medical equipment requirements, including the 
contents of first-aid kits, applicable to all certificate holders 
operating passenger aircraft under that part.
    (b) Considerations.--In carrying out subsection (a), the 
Administrator shall consider whether the minimum contents of approved 
emergency medical kits, including approved first-aid kits, include 
appropriate medications and equipment to meet the emergency medical 
needs of children.
                                 <all>
```
William F. McDonough

Attorney at Law, LLC

35888 Center Ridge Road, Unit 3

North Ridgeville, OH 44039

Phone: (440) 327-1542 Fax: (440) 327-1225

Email: TricountylawOhio@gmail.com Website: www.dronelaw.us

October 22, 2015

VIA ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION ONLY

U.S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE

Washington, DC 20590

RE: Myrealtor Group, LLC

 333 Exemption Petition

Dear Sir or Madam:

Attached please find Myrealtor Group, LLC’s request for an exemption from the listed Federal 

Aviation Regulations to allow commercial operation of its Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems 

(“sUASs”) for aerial/video photography for the real estate industry. This exemption request is 

exclusively for the use of the UAS Phantom 3, Professional Model, manufactured by DJI

Innovations, a Hong Kong based company.

Also attached to this correspondence is the DJI Phantom 3 Professional User Manual (hereinafter 

“Manual”), which outlines the operating requirements, limitations, and technical specifications

for the DJI Phantom 3, Professional System. Myrealtor Group, LLC has reviewed this Manual 

and has found it to be acceptable for sUAS aerial photography operations.

Thank you in advance for your time and consideration. Please contact the undersigned should 

you have any questions or concerns.

Yours truly,

William F. McDonough

Counsel for Myrealtor Group, LLC

WFM:maf

Enclosures
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MARA FLAMM : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. :

:

SARNER & ASSOCIATES, P.C.; JOSHUA SARNER; : NO. 02-4302

LEONARD SARNER, ESQUIRE; :

JODI H. BROWN, M.D.; JOHN MATUSAVAGE; :

JOHN DOE PROCESS SERVER, INDIVIDUALLY AND :

AS AGENT FOR SARNER 7 ASSOCIATES, P.C.; :

JOSHUA SARNER, ESQUIRE; LEONARD SARNER, :

ESQUIRE; AND JODI H. BROWN, M.D. :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 5th day of May, 2005, after conducting a Telephone Status Conference with

counsel in the above-captioned action, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Sarner Defendants’ Motion for Leave to File a Reply in Further Support of their

Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Entry No. 77) is DENIED.

2. All confidential information, as discussed at the above-mentioned Telephone Status

Conference, shall be filed UNDER SEAL.

BY THE COURT:

 

M. FAITH ANGELL

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 78 Filed 05/06/2005 Page 1 of 1
# C_2021320EN.01003501.xml

| 9.8.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 320/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.8.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 320/35

---

Judgment of the General Court of 30 June 2021 — BZ v ECB

(Case T-554/16) (1)

(Public service - ECB staff - Application for recognition of the occupational origin of a disease - Articles 6.3.11 to 6.3.13 of the ECB Staff Rules - Irregularity of the procedure - No inquiry report - Non-contractual liability)

(2021/C 320/38)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: BZ (represented by: S. Pappas, lawyer)

Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: E. Carlini and F. Malfrère, acting as Agents, assisted by B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU and Article 50a of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union seeking, first, annulment of the decision of the ECB of 23 July 2014 which closed the procedure for recognition of the occupational origin of the applicant’s disease, and second, compensation for the material and non-material harm that the applicant allegedly suffered as a result of that decision.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the European Central Bank (ECB) of 23 July 2014 which closed the procedure for recognition of the occupational origin of BZ’s disease; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the European Central Bank (ECB) of 23 July 2014 which closed the procedure for recognition of the occupational origin of BZ’s disease;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders the ECB to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the ECB to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 279, 24.8.2015 (case initially registered at the European Union Civil Service Tribunal as Case F-79/15 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1.9.2016).

---
### IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 20 - 0481 C. EDWARD BUMGARNER,

Plaint iff and Appellant, v. CITY OF CHOTEAU BOA,

Defendant and Appellee. ORDER OF MEDIATOR APPOINTMENT

All mediator s previously appointed in this matter, has notified the Court that th ey are unable to fu lfil this appo int me nt . Accordingly, all previ ous order s of mediator appoint me nt are hereby rescinded and IT IS ORDERED THAT **Stuart L. Kellner,** whose name appears next on th e list of attorneys desiring appo int me nt a s med iators for Mon ey J udgments appeals which is maintained pursuant to M.R.App.P., 7(4)(e), is hereby appo int ed to co nduct th e mediat io n process required by M.R.App.P., 7(5), and IT IS FURTHE R ORDERED th at t he time peri ods set fo rth in M.R.App.P., 7(5)(d) shall run from th e date of this order of appoint me nt . A true copy

of this order is being mailed to counsel of record f or the parti es, or to th e parties individually if not represented by counsel , on the dat e hereof. DATED thi s December 1, 2020.

Bowen Greenwood , Clerk of the Supreme Court c: C. Edward Bumgarner, Jeffrey M. Hindo ie n , Stuart L. Kellner



# ,...6..-f 12/01/2020

Case Number: DA 20-0481
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 05-6974

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus WILLIAM KEITH PATTERSON, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Chief District Judge. (CR-96-154-MU; CA-01-278) Submitted: December 21, 2005 Decided: April 3, 2006 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. William Keith Patterson, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: William Keith Patterson seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of his constitutional c laims is debatable and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Patterson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny Patterson’s motion for a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
##### 



AMENDED AND RESTATED
SEVERANCE AND CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT
 Amended and Restated Severance and Change in Control Agreement Agreement Effective Date Anadys Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Company James T.
Glover Executive Parties Party
 Recitals
 Whereas
 Whereas
 Whereas
 Now, Therefore ,
 Agreement
 1. Employment.
 1.1 Loyalty; At Will Employment.
 1.2 Termination of Obligations.
 1.




---



##### 



1.3
 2. Definitions.
  2.1 Cause.  Cause 
 (i)
 (ii)
 (iii)
 (iv) Proprietary Information and Inventions Agreement
 2.2 Change in Control. Change in Control
 (i)
 2.




---



##### 



(ii)
 (iii)
 2.3 Complete Disability.  Complete Disability   Complete
Disability 
 2.4 Good Reason.  Good Reason 
 3.




---



##### 



(i)
 (ii)
 (iii)
 (iv)
 2.5 Integration
 3. Compensation Upon Termination.
 3.1 Death Or Complete Disability.
 3.2 With Cause or Without Good Reason.
 3.3 Without Cause or for Good Reason. Release
 4.




---



##### 



(i) Base Salary
 (ii) COBRA provided, however,
 (iii)
 (iv)
 5.




---



##### 



3.4 Additional Change in Control Related Severance Benefits.
 (i) Bonus Payment 100% Bonus Opportunity
Amount
 (ii)
 4. Tax Compliance
 4.1 Application of Internal Revenue Code Section 409A.
 4.2 Parachute Payment. Payment Excise Tax Reduced Amount
 6.




---



##### 



provided, however,
   5. Company Property.
 6. Other Terminations.
 7.




---



##### 



7. Acknowledgement.
 8. General.
 In Witness Whereof
 Anadys Pharmaceuticals, Inc.By:
    /s/ Stephen WorlandIts:  President and Chief Executive OfficerDated: March 3, 2008Executive:/s/ James T. GloverJames T. GloverDated: March 3, 2008 8.




---



##### 



EXHIBIT A
 RELEASE AND WAIVER OF CLAIMS
 Anadys Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Company Release and Waiver
 ADEA
 A general release does not extend to claims which the creditor does not
know or suspect to exist in his or her favor at the time of executing the release, which if known
by him or her must have materially affected his or her settlement with the debtor.
 9.




---



##### 



Date: __________________
    By: 10.
MW EPA CAA Testing Method 315 A398's

4 HR Test Start Date Al Production

MCEM 

Total

MCEM 

Total Particulate Particulate

tons/hr lbs/TAP lbs/hr lbs/TAP lbs/hr

4/23/2013 Run 1 16.87 0.892 15.05 3.096 52.23

4/24/2013 Run 2 16.87 0.526 8.87 0.850 14.34

4/25/2013 Run 3 16.87 0.568 9.58 0.900 15.18

Plant Average 16.87 0.662 11.17 1.615 27.25
No. 62482.

#### Canada Dry Ginger Ale, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 324546-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that the facts and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, were not in fact received by the importer. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited, it was held that duty and internal revenue tax are not assessable upon such portions of the merchandise as were reported by the inspector as manifested, not found. The protests were sustained to this extent.
No. 49965.

#### Protests 914412-G, etc., of Bingham & Co., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record showed that certain items of the merchandise consisted of hemp knotted hats similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 46497, which record was admitted in evidence herein. In accordance therewith the items in question were held dutiable at 25 percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (1) as claimed.