alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofAXT, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter endedSeptember 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Wilson W. Cheung, Chief Financial Officerof the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 906”),that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Dated: November 9, 2006 |   | By:    |   | /s/ Wilson W. Cheung    |
|------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|                         |   |   |   | Wilson W. Cheung        |
|                         |   |   |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
(Reap. Dec. 10666)

Entry No. 792472, etc.

#### Inter-Maritime Fwdg. Co., Inc. v. United States

(Decided January 23, 1964)

*Tompkins & Tompkins*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Rao, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, attached to this decision and made a part hereof, were submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

> It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between counsel for the Plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, Defendant, that the automobiles specified on the invoices accompanying the entries covered by the reap-praisement appeals listed in the attached Schedule A, which Schedule A is made a part of this stipulation, that were appraised at a value of $1240.00 each, net, (Canadian dollars), consist of automobiles manufactured in England, and imported into the United States from Canada.

> That there was no “foreign value”, or “export value”, or “United States value”, as defined in Sections 402 (e), (d) and (e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, for the automobiles under appeal at the time of exportation thereof.

> That in determining the “cost of production” value as defined in Section 402(f) of said Act, the Appraiser included in his above value $1240 each, net, a cost of $95.00 (Canadian dollars) representing a Canadian excise tax, as well as a cost of $230.00 (Canadian dollars) representing a Canadian sales tax. That said Canadian excise tax ($95.) and sales tax ($230.) were paid to the Canadian government prior to exportation to the United States, but they were refunded after exportation, under the same circumstances and conditions involved in the case of *John V. Carr & Son, Inc.*v. *United States,*Reap. Dec. 10442, and that the record in said *John V. Carr & Son, Inc.*case may be incorporated as a part of the record in this ease.

> *422Plaintiff limits its appeal to the claim that said excise tax of $96.00, and the said sales tax of $230.00 should not be included as a part of the cost of production dutiable value.

Upon tlie agreed facts and the cited authority, I find cost of production, as that value is defined in section 402(f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the automobiles covered by said appeals for reappraisement and that such value is 'the appraised value, less $95 Canadian excise tax, less $230’ Canadian sales tax, expressed in terms of Canadian dollars.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
No. 59462.

protest 260828-K (New York).

#### B. Altman & Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

An examination of the record failing to disclose anything that would warrant the court in disturbing the finding of the collector, which was presumptively correct, the protest was overruled.
Before the Third Division,

May 28, 1963

No. 67775.

#### Den-Va Co. *v.*United States,

protests 58/3613 and 58/10592 (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise was previously imported and thereafter exported under lease and reimported, without having been advanced in value or improved in condition, and that the applicable customs regulations have now been complied with, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
p.1 

AUSTIN POWDER COMPANY 4?/, ^fe ) 

430 POWDER PLANT ROAD 

McARTHUR, OHIO 45651 

McARTHUR TELEPHONE 740-596-528<&: 

FAX 740-596-4050 

May 24, 2013 

Document Control Office (7407M) 

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics 

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW 

Washington, DC 20460-0001 

RE: Application for Exemption, TSCA 4 Test Rule, 40 CFR 799.5087, CAS #78-11-5, 3-zptopsnrfiol, 2, 

2-bis [(nitrooxy) methyl]-, dinitrate (ester) "PETN", EPA Docket No. EPA-HQ-OPPT-2007-0531 

Dear Sir or Madam, 

Austin Powder Company, 25800 Science Park, Cleveland, OH 44122-7386 submits this application for 

exemption from all the testing of "PETN", CAS# 78-11-5 under TSCA Section 4 ruling as noted above. 

As part of our exemption, we are providing the following information: 

a) The identity of the test rule, the chemical identity, and the CAS No. of the substance which is 

based. 

Testing of certain high production volume chemicals: Second group of chemicals, 40 CFR 

799.5087, 76 FR 1067 dated January 7, 2011, "PEW CAS# 78-11-5. 

b) We are requesting an exemption from all testing requirements for "PETN", CAS# 78-11-5, 

under 40 CFR 799.5087 because we are aware that this material has been sponsored for 

testing (per above) by another party. 

c) Name, Address and Telephone number of applicant 

Austin Powder Company 

25800 Science Park 

Cleveland, OH 44122-7386 

Phone: 216-464-2400 

d) Name, address and telephone number of appropriate individual to contact for further 

information: 

Keith Mills 

Austin Powder Company 

25800 SCIENCE PARK DRIVE CLEVELAND, OHIO 44122 PHONE:21 6-464-2400 FAX:21 6-464-44 1 8 

430 Powder Plant Road 

McArthur, OH 45651 

Phone: 740-596-5286 i iiiiiiiipiil 

4.0 1 3000004- 0 

III 

CONTAINS NO CBI 
P. 2 

I understand that if this application is granted before the reimbursement period described in section 

4(c)(3)(B) of TSCA expires, we must pay a fair and equitable reimbursement to the entity who incurred 

or shared in the cost of complying with the requirement to submit data and upon whose data the granting 

of my application was based. 

We submit this information; however if you have any questions, comments or require additional 

information, please do not hesitate to contact me. 

Keith Mills 

Director of Manufacturing 

Austin Powder Company 

430 Powder Plant Road 

McArthur, OH 45651 

Phone: 740^596-5286 

Email: keith.mills@austinpowder.com 

Thank You, 
ID 

<z x ro i— o — 

to toaccm -z- n 

= SI 

£2 

C O 

C - J 

£=3 

8 | 

o a 

~ a. 

IJ 

S 

s 

O 

o 

Q 

o 

c 

< 

O <D O 

•S

 < o 

$ .2 <N 

S

IB 

«) g 

C Q 

c 

0* 

© 

o 

<N 

•a 

o tu 

>-

z 

2 

u

 £ * tol S 

£t « .2 

9 m 3- CC 

o 

2
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

   Schedule of Year-To-Date Principal and Interest Distributions
                           to
                  Certificateholders
                                                                              Ending
Class                   Interest             Principal      Losses           Balance
<S>                     <C>                  <C>            <C>              <C>
A1                     2,682,895.52       5,652,159.06         0.00         65,595,840.94
A2                       345,568.83        (345,568.83)        0.00          9,120,568.83
A3                       573,750.00               0.00         0.00         15,300,000.00
A4                        14,535.10               0.00         0.00                  0.00
A5                       616,555.68          64,871.43         0.00         15,872,728.57
A6                       745,148.73       2,716,184.76         0.00         17,483,815.24
A7                       624,452.57         605,372.81         0.00         15,729,627.19
A8                       140,393.50        (140,393.50)        0.00          3,705,393.49
B1                        21,579.64           2,273.10         0.00            555,547.90
B2                        15,414.04           1,623.64         0.00            396,820.36
B3                        15,413.99           1,623.64         0.00            396,820.14
IO                       251,514.16               0.00         0.00                  0.00
M1                       110,981.01          11,690.23         0.00          2,857,103.77
M2                        52,407.70           5,520.39         0.00          1,349,187.62
M3                        30,828.06           3,247.29         0.00            793,639.72
PO                             0.00          10,059.97         0.00          1,629,824.04
R1                           304.58             100.00         0.00                  0.00
R2                             0.65             100.00         0.00                  0.00

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              18 USC, SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the quarterly  report of Retail  Highway.com,  Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal  quarter ended March 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission (the "Report"),  I, Michael Levine,
the Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Dated: May 13, 2004                       s/Michael Levine
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Michael Levine, Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

            In connection with the Annual Report of Knockout Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended  December 31, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, John Bellamy,  Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and result of  operations of the
Company.

            A signed original of this written statement  required by Section 906
has been  provided  to the  Company  and will be  retained  by the  Company  and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


May 18, 2006                         /s/ John Bellamy
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    John Bellamy
                                    Chief Executive Officer and
                                    Principal Financial Officer
# C_2016251EN.01005102.xml

| 11.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 251/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 251/51

---

Action brought on 13 May 2016 — ZZ v Commission

(Case F-24/16)

(2016/C 251/60)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: F. Moyse, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision rejecting the request for the defendant to provide the applicant with the revised calculation of the latter’s financial entitlements following his resignation from the Commission in 2000.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:

| — | annul the Commission’s decision of 15 March 2016 rejecting the applicant’s complaint; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the Commission’s decision of 15 March 2016 rejecting the applicant’s complaint;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

---
# C_2017104EN.01004702.xml

| 3.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 104/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 104/47

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 February 2017 — DMC v EUIPO — Etike’ International (De Giusti ORGOGLIO)

(Case T-18/16) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark De Giusti ORGOGLIO - Earlier EU word mark ORGOGLIO - Relative ground for refusal - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2017/C 104/67)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: DMC Srl (San Vendemiano, Italy) (represented by: B. Osti, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Rampini, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Etike’ International Srl (Baronissi, Italy) (represented by: V. Fiorillo, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 5 November 2015 (Case R 1764/2013-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Etike’ International and DMC.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders DMC Srl to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders DMC Srl to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 90, 7.3.2016.

1

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE PETITION OF FRESCATI SHIPPING ) (THE HONORABLE JOEL H.
COMPANY, LTD., as owner of the M/T ) SLOMSKY)
ATHOS I, and TSAKOS SHIPPING AND )
TRADING, S.A., as Manager of the ATHOS I, ) Civil Action
for Exoneration from or Limitation of Liability ) No. 05-cv-305
)
)
)
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) Civil Action
Plaintiff, ) No. 08-cv-2898
)
v. ) CONSOLIDATED
)
CITGO ASPHALT REFINING COMPANY, )
et al., } This document has been electronically
Defendants. ) filed.
)
NOTICE OF APPEAL

Notice is hereby given that Frescati Shipping Company, Ltd. and Tsakos Shipping and
Trading, S.A., Plaintiffs in the above-named case, hereby appeal to the United States Court of
Appeals for the Third Circuit from the District Court’s Final Order of Judgment (ECF No. 888
dated August 17, 2016) and accompanying Opinion (ECF No. 872 dated July 25, 2016).

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ John J. Levy

Date: October 14, 2016 John J. Levy (ID No. 42377)
Timothy J. Bergére (ID No. 39110)
MOoNTOMGERY, MCCRACKEN, WALKER & RHOADS, LLP
123 South Broad Street
Philadelphia, PA 19109-1029
(215) 772-1500
jlevy@mmwr.com
tbergere@mmwr.com
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Frescati Shipping Company, Ltd. and
Tsakos Shipping & Trading, S.A.

4185762v1


CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of Plaintiffs’ Notice of Appeal was filed
electronically. I certify my understanding that the following counsel have consented to service of

this filing through the receipt of electronic notification from the Court:

Carter G. Phillips, Esq. Anne Murphy, Esq.

Benjamin Beaton, Esq. United States Department of Justice
Richard Young, Esq. Civil Division, Appellate Staff
Jacqueline G. Cooper (application for 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
admission pending) Room 7523

Sidley Austin LLP Washington, D.C. 20530

1501 K Street, NW (202) 514-3688

Washington, DC 20005 Anne.Murphy@usdoj.gov

(202) 736-8000 Attorneys for the United States of America

fephillips@sidley.com
bbeaton@sidley.com

ryoung@sidley.com

jcooper@sidley.com
Attorneys for CITGO

Matthew M. Collette, Esq.

United States Department of Justice
Civil Division, Appellate Staff

950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Room 7527

Washington, D.C. 20530

(202) 514-4214
Matthew.Collette@usdoj.g0v

Attorneys for the United States of America

This Certificate of Service and the said filing are intended to be available for viewing and
downloading from the ECF system of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of

Pennsylvania.

Dated: October 14, 2016 /s/ John J. Levy
John J. Levy (ID No. 42377

4185762v1
Case No. 8,364.

#### Ex parte LINDO.

[1 Cranch, C. C. 445.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

Nov. Term, 1807.

Witness — Ansvch Tending to Criminate.

A witness must answer whether he saw the defendant at a public gaming-table, inasmuch as the answer cannot criminate or tend to crim inate the witness himself.

Rule to show cause why an attachment of contempt should not issue against a witness for not answering this question by the grand jury, “Did you within the last three months, see Richard Lewis play at any public gaming-table within the county of Alexandria?”

The witness [Abraham Lindo] objects that it may tend to criminate himself, by showing that he was present at a public gaming-table, and may induce Lewis to prosecute him.

Mr. Swann, for the witness,

cited 1 Morgan, Essays, 43S; 2 Hawk. p. 609, c. 46, § 20; 1 Atk. 539.

But

THE COURT

(DUCKETT, Circuit Judge, absent)

decided that he must answer, inasmuch as the answer could not criminate nor tend to criminate himself. Whereupon he submitted to answer.
***Credit Gateway***

**Gateway Account Correction Form**

**This form is for government agency use only.**

**If you have questions, please contact Customer Care at 1-877-815-1206.**

Agency Approval Information

Transaction Details

For Credit Gateway internal use only

�

This form may contain confidential information

V 1.5 5/31/2013
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<RESTATED>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                           4,883
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   17,344
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,864
<INVENTORY>                                     33,447
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                66,858
<PP&E>                                          40,304
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,097
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 111,643
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           29,545
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                      4,000
<COMMON>                                        46,011
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   111,643
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                59,697
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   43,288
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,535
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    298
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,181
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (883)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    508
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,391)
<EPS-BASIC>                                    (.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.07)


</TABLE>
No. 58470.

protest 206383-K (Detroit).

#### Nebraska Bridge Supply & Lumber Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

The protest was dismissed.
No. 49087.

#### Protest 95886-K of David Kannengiesser (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated by counsel that the banana flakes in question are the same in all material respects as those passed upon in *Sardik*v. *United States*(8 Cust. Ct. 400, C. D. 646), the record in which was incorporated herein. In accordance therewith they were held dutiable at 17% percent under paragraph 752, as amended by the trade agreements with Costa Rica (T. D. 49072) and Ecuador (T. D. 49710). Protest sustained to this extent.
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS4740 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
# C_2017178EN.01001402.xml

| 6.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/14

---

Judgment of the General Court of 24 April 2017 — HF v Parliament

(Case T-584/16) (1)

1

((Civil Service - Member of the auxiliary contract staff - Article 3b of the CEOS - Successive employments as a member of the auxiliary contract staff - Fixed-term contracts - Decision not to renew - Abuse of power - Request for assistance - Right to be heard - Non-contractual liability))

(2017/C 178/17)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: HF (represented by: A. Tymen, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: L. Deneys and S. Alves, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application on the basis of Article 270 TFEU seeking, firstly, the annulment of the Parliament’s decision not to renew the applicant’s contract as a member of the auxiliary contract staff and, secondly, compensation for the harm allegedly suffered by the applicant, essentially as a result of that decision.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Ms HF to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Ms HF to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 165, 10.5.2016 (case initially registered before the European Union Civil Service Tribunal under Case No F-14/16 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1.9.2016).

1

---