alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?


C\_2017014EN.01002801.xml


| | | | |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 16.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 14/28 |

---

Reference for a preliminary ruling from First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) (United Kingdom) made on 28 October 2016 — Kubota (UK) Limited, EP Barrus Limited v Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs

(Case C-545/16)

(2017/C 014/33)

Language of the case: English

Referring court

First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber)

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Kubota (UK) Limited, EP Barrus Limited

Defendant: Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue & Customs

Questions referred

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 1. | Is Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/221 [(1)](#ntr1-C_2017014EN.01002801-E0001) concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature invalid in so far as it classifies the vehicles specified in the Regulation under CN Code 8704 21 91, rather than CN Code 8704 10? |

| | | |
| --- | --- | --- |
| | 2. | In particular, is Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/221 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature invalid in so far as it: unduly restricts the scope of subheading 8704-10; takes into account impermissible factors; is internally inconsistent; does not take proper account of the Explanatory Notes, CN headings and GIRs; and/or fails to take account of the relevant requirements identified by case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union in relation to CN heading 8704 10? |

---

[(1)](#ntc1-C_2017014EN.01002801-E0001)  Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/221 of 10 February 2015 concerning the classification of certain goods in the Combined Nomenclature

[OJ L 37, p. 1](http://publications.europa.eu/resource/oj/JOL_2015_037_R_TOC)

---
# C_2018083EN.01000301.xml

| 5.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 83/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 83/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 January 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de lo Social No 1 de Cuenca — Spain) — Carlos Enrique Ruiz Conejero v Ferroser Servicios Auxiliares SA, Ministerio Fiscal

(Case C-270/16) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Social policy - Directive 2000/78/EC - Equal treatment in employment and occupation - Article 2(2)(b)(i) - Prohibition of discrimination based on disability - National legislation permitting, subject to certain conditions, the dismissal of an employee by reason of intermittent absences, even where justified - Worker’s absences resulting from illnesses linked to his disability - Difference in treatment based on disability - Indirect discrimination - Whether justified - Combating absenteeism in the workplace - Whether appropriate - Whether proportionate))

(2018/C 083/03)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Referring court

Juzgado de lo Social No 1 de Cuenca

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Carlos Enrique Ruiz Conejero

Applicant:

Defendant: Ferroser Servicios Auxiliares SA, Ministerio Fiscal

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 2(2)(b)(i) of Council Directive 2008/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation must be interpreted as precluding national legislation under which an employer may dismiss a worker on the grounds of his intermittent absences from work, even if justified, in a situation where those absences are the consequence of sickness attributable to a disability suffered by that worker, unless that legislation, while pursuing the legitimate aim of combating absenteeism, does not go beyond what is necessary in order to achieve that aim, which is a matter for the referring court to assess.

---

(1)  OJ C 279, 1.8.2016.

1

---
**EXHIBIT31.1**

 

**CertificationPursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Philip C. S. Yin, certify that:

 

1.               I have reviewedthis report on Form 10-Q of AXT, Inc.;

 

2.               Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.               Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I am responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)          Designed such disclosurecontrols and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures tobe designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to meby others within those entities, particularly during the period in which thisreport is being prepared;

 

(b)         Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)          Disclosed in this reportany change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.               The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors:

 

(a)          All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

(b)         Any fraud, whether or notmaterial, that involves management or other employees who have a significantrole in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Dated: May 6, 2005 |   | By:    | /s/ Philip C. S. Yin    |
|--------------------|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|               |   |   | Philip C. S. Yin        |
|               |   |   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 


FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 


HAROLD C. WILSON CIVIL ACTION 


Plaintiff, 

v. 

CITY OF PIDLADELPIDA, et aI., 

Defendants. NO. 04-5396 

ORDER 

NOW, this 22M day ofFebrtllU)', 2012, upon consideration ofthe Motion of Defendaot, 

R. Seth Williams, to Dismiss Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint, Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of 

the Federai Rules of Civil Procedure (Doc. 96) and Plaintiffs Response thereto, for the reasons 

provided in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that: 

1. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 96) is GRANTED IN PART 

and DENIED IN PART; 

2. Insofar as Defendant's Motion requests that any and all state law claims 

against Defendant Williams be dismissed, Defendant's Motion is GRANTED; 

3. Insofar as Defendant's Motion requests that Plaintiffs claims against 

Mr. Williams be dismissed as time-barred and for lack ofMr. Williams' personal involvement, 

Defendant's Motion is DENIED. 

BY THE COURT: 

L.,,1Rt&!rfD 

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 

Case 2:04-cv-05396-GJP Document 105 Filed 02/22/12 Page 1 of 1
# 01front.doc

# 02conts.doc

# 03summ.doc

# 04chap1.doc

# 05chap2.doc

# 06chap3.doc

# 07chap4.doc

# 08chap5.doc

# 09refs.doc

# 10etbl1.doc

# 11gloss.doc

# 12biblio.doc

# 13appa.doc

# 14appb.doc

# 15appc.doc

# epininv.htm

# Files.txt
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of United Defense
Industries, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge,
that:



| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for
the fiscal quarterly ended September 30, 2003 (the
Report) fully complies
with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



| |                                                                                                                                                          
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.




|                        |  |                                                                           
|----------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: November 7, 2003 |  | /s/ Thomas W. RabautThomas W. Rabaut
President and Chief Executive Officer




The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before
or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in
such filing.
Document

                            
Exhibit 10.43

PRIVATE AND CONFIDENTIAL 
[ Name ] 
LivaNova Plc
20 Eastbourne Terrace
London
W2 6LG
[ Date ]
Dear [ Name ], 
Letter of appointment 
The Board of Directors / Shareholders of LivaNova PLC (the “Company”) on [ Date ] appointed / re-elected you as a member of the board of directors (the “Board”). In addition, the Board [ appoined / ratified [ Position ] [Board / Committee ].  
Your appointment and re-appointment commenced on [ Date ] and shall continue until the conclusion of the Company’s [ Year ] Annual General Meeting, subject to the earlier termination by the Company:
1)For disqualification for any of the grounds set out in Article 30.1 of the Company’s articles of association, as amended from time to time; and/or


2)On the grounds of the commission by you of any serious or repeated breach or non-observance of your obligations to the Company (which includes an obligation not to breach your statutory, fiduciary or common-law duties).
You will be expected to devote such time as is necessary for the proper performance of your duties
By accepting this appointment, you agree that this letter is a contract for services and is not a contract of employment and you confirm that you are not subject to any restrictions which prevent you from holding office as a director. 


Your appointment with the Company and any dispute or claim arising out of or in connection with it or its subject matter or formation (including non-contractual disputes or claims) shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the law of England and you and the Company irrevocably agree that the courts of England shall have exclusive jurisdiction to settle any dispute 
LivaNova PLC            T +44 20 3325 0660
Registered in England and Wales    www.livanova.com
Registered No. 09451374    
4th Floor,
20 Eastbourne Terrace, 
London  W2 6LG
United Kingdom
1









or claim that arises out of or in connection with this appointment or its subject matter or formation (including non-contractual disputes or claims). 
Please indicate your acceptance of these terms by signing and returning the attached copy of this letter to the Board. 


 
			
	
	Yours sincerely


__________________________________

	
	
	For and on behalf of LIVANOVA PLC

	
	Name: Damien McDonald
	Title: Director and Chief Executive Officer


 


I confirm and agree to the terms of my appointment as a non-executive director of LivaNova PLC as set out in this letter. 
 
			
	
	
	

__________________________________

	

Name:  

	Date:


 


2
Exhibit 32.1

                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of GS Energy
Corporation (the "Company"), certifies that:

     1.   The Annual  Report on Form  10-KSB of the  Company  for the year ended
          December 31, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the  requirements
          of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 (15
          U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



                                         /S/      KEVIN KREISLER
                                         -----------------------
Dated: April 16, 2007                             KEVIN KREISLER
                                                  Chief Executive Officer

                                         /S/      JAMES GRAINER
                                        -----------------------
Dated: April 16, 2007                             JAMES GRAINER
                                                  Chief Financial Officer

This  certification  is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,
subject  to the  knowledge  standard  contained  therein,  and not for any other
purpose.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

: CIVIL ACTION NOS.

:

ROCHELLE : 02-3867

MONTGOMERY : 02-3889

HINES : 02-3901

KARI, et al. : 02-3926

HABERMAN : 02-3936

MILEY : 02-3951

FRANCO, et al. : 02-3975

DAVIS : 02-4113

RUSSELL, et al. : 02-4116

HERNANDEZ, et al. : 02-4126

QUILLEN, et al. : 02-4167

SIMMONS, et al. : 02-4174

BIEDERMAN : 02-4194

DRY, et al. : 02-4225

COOK : 02-4237

STEFAN, et al. : 02-4277

WALKER, et al. : 02-4283

DUNCAN, et al. : 02-4301

:

VS. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION, et al. :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of July, 2002, the Court having been previously

advised that the above action cannot proceed to trial and disposition because of the following

reason:

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending disposition of a related

action.

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending determination of

arbitration proceedings.

[ ] - Interlocutory appeal filed.

Case 2:02-cv-04167-SD Document 2 Filed 07/10/2002 Page 1 of 2
[ X ] - Other: Case is placed into suspense pending receipt of the Case

Transfer Order from the Judicial Panel on Multi District Litigation

transferring case to District of Minnesota.

It is

ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this action closed for statistical purposes and

place the matter in the Civil Suspense File, and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction; and that the case be

restored to the trial docket when the action is in a status so that it may proceed to final

disposition; this order shall not prejudice the rights of the parties to this litigation.

BY THE COURT:

________________________________________

Stewart Dalzell, S.J.

Case 2:02-cv-04167-SD Document 2 Filed 07/10/2002 Page 2 of 2
No. 56346.

protests 155766-K, etc. (New York).

#### Drueding Brothers Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

The protests were dismissed.
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1053 

To require the Secretary of the Interior to issue new resource management 

plans applicable to the Beaver Dam Wash National Conservation Area 

and the Red Cliffs National Conservation Area and a new amendment 

to the St. George Field Office Resource Management Plan, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 4, 2017 

Mr. HATCH (for himself and Mr. LEE) introduced the following bill; which was 

read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of the Interior to issue new resource 

management plans applicable to the Beaver Dam Wash 

National Conservation Area and the Red Cliffs National 

Conservation Area and a new amendment to the St. 

George Field Office Resource Management Plan, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1053 IS

1 SECTION 1. ISSUANCE OF NEW RESOURCE MANAGEMENT 

2 PLANS FOR THE BEAVER DAM WASH AND 

3 RED CLIFFS NATIONAL CONSERVATION 

4 AREAS AND A NEW AMENDMENT TO THE ST. 

5 GEORGE FIELD OFFICE RESOURCE MANAGE6 MENT PLAN. 

7 The Secretary of the Interior (acting through the Di8 rector of the Bureau of Land Management)— 

9 (1) shall not implement or enforce the resource 

10 management plans for the Beaver Dam Wash Na11 tional Conservation Area or the Red Cliffs National 

12 Conservation Area or the amendment to the St. 

13 George Field Office Resource Management Plan de14 scribed in the notice of the Bureau of Land Manage15 ment entitled ‘‘Notice of Availability of the Record 

16 of Decision and the Approved Resource Management 

17 Plans for the Beaver Dam Wash and Red Cliffs Na18 tional Conservation Areas; and Approved Amend19 ment to the St. George Field Office Resource Man20 agement Plan in Washington County, Utah’’ (81 

21 Fed. Reg. 93707 (December 21, 2016)); and 

22 (2) shall issue new resource management plans 

23 and a new amendment to replace the resource man24 agement plans and amendment to the resource man25 agement plan referred to in paragraph (1) that are 

26 prepared— 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1053 IS

1 (A) in accordance with the requirements 

2 for management plans established under sub3 title O of title I of the Omnibus Public Land 

4 Management Act of 2009 (Public Law 111–11; 

5 123 Stat. 1075); and 

6 (B) in coordination with affected units of 

7 local government, in accordance with section 

8 202(c)(9) of the Federal Land Policy and Man9 agement Act of 1976 (43 U.S.C. 1712(c)(9)). 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
# C_2017014EN.01003501.xml

| 16.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 14/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 14/35

---

Order of the General Court of 27 October 2016 — Port autonome du Centre et de l’Ouest and Others v Commission

(Case T-116/16) (1)

((Action for annulment - State aid - Corporate tax - Aid in favour of Belgian ports granted by Belgium - Commission letter proposing the adoption of appropriate measures - Measure not open to challenge - Inadmissibility))

(2017/C 014/43)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: Port autonome du Centre et de l’Ouest SCRL (La Louvière, Belgium), Port autonome de Namur (Namur, Belgiun), Port autonome de Charleroi (Charleroi, Belgium), Port autonome de Liège (Liège, Belgium), Région wallonne (Belgium) (represented by: J. Vanden Eynde, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: S. Noë and B. Stromsky, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action based on Article 263 TFEU, requesting annulment of the alleged decision concerning State aid SA.38393 (2015/E) — Taxation of ports in Belgium, annexed to the Commission’s letter of 22 January 2016 seeking to propose appropriate measures to the Kingdom of Belgium.

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | The Port autonome du Centre et de l’Ouest SCRL, the Port autonome de Namur, the Port autonome de Charleroi, the Port autonome de Liège and the Région wallonne shall bear their own costs and those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The Port autonome du Centre et de l’Ouest SCRL, the Port autonome de Namur, the Port autonome de Charleroi, the Port autonome de Liège and the Région wallonne shall bear their own costs and those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  
  OJ C 175, 17.5.2016.

---
Updated October 5, 2023

OTCnet 4.7.1 (Part 2)– Release Notes – Page 1 of 3 

OTCnet 4.7.1 (Part 2) Release Notes

November 2023 

blank

blank
Updated October 5, 2023

OTCnet 4.7.1 (Part 2) – Release Notes – Page 2 of 3 

blank

blank

CONTENTS

OTCnet Release 4.7.1 (Part 2) Overview ................................................................................................................. 3

System Updates ................................................................................................................................................................ 3

 
Updated October 5, 2023

OTCnet 4.7.1 (Part 2) – Release Notes – Page 3 of 3

OTCnet Release 4.7.1 (Part 2) Overview

The U.S. Treasury Bureau of the Fiscal Service (Fiscal Service) Over the Counter Division (OTCD) is 

updating the Over-the-Counter Channel Application (OTCnet) to Release 4.7.1 (Part 2) in November 

2023, which introduces the following updates:

System Updates

 Extend Session Timeout to 30 Minutes in OTCnet Online: The session timeout in the Online 

application will be extended to 30 minutes which prevents unnecessary timeouts due to 

inactivity. This is an extension of the original 15-minute limit. 

 Display Access Message to Kiosk Operators That Are Not Yet Provisioned: Kiosk 

Operators that have been provisioned in SailPoint, but not yet in OTCnet, will receive an access 

message that reads “Thank you for logging into OTC Kiosk. You have completed the steps to 

request access to the application. Please contact your agency’s security administrator to assign 

your OTC Kiosk Endpoint(s) and role(s). Once they have completed your role and endpoint 

assignments, you will be able to make payments with OTC Kiosk.”

 Address Security Updates: Manage several security enhancements such as technical debts 

and security scan findings. 

 Apply Code Cleanup Updates and Database (DB) Updates: Address unused scripts and 

enhance the DB Maintenance Job Process.