alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2018399EN.01003201.xml

| 5.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 399/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 399/32

---

Judgment of the General Court of 19 September 2018 — HD v Parliament

(Case T-604/16) (1)

((Civil service - Officials - Remuneration - Family allowances - Household allowance - Education allowance - Dependent child allowance - Conditions for granting - Deduction of an allowance of like nature received from another source - Recovery of undue payments - Decisions to end entitlement to certain allowances - Error of law - Manifest error of assessment))

(2018/C 399/43)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: HD (represented by: C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: M. Ecker and L. Deneys, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking annulment, first, of the decisions of the Parliament of 21 September, 5 October, 27 November and 15 December 2015 recovering the amounts alleged to have been unduly received by the applicant in respect of the education allowance, secondly, of the decisions of the Parliament of 5, 13, 23 October, of the 5, 11 and 12 November 2015 recovering the amounts alleged to have been unduly received by her in respect of education allowance and dependent child allowance and depriving her of her right to household allowance and, thirdly, ‘in so far as necessary’, of the decision of 21 April 2016 rejecting her complaint.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders HD to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders HD to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 326, 5.9.2016 (case initially registered before the European Union Civil Service Tribunal under Case No F-34/16 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1.9.2016).

---
No. 50373.

#### Protests 69490-K, etc., of Wm. Filene’s Sons Co. et al. (Boston, etc.).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 57212.

protests 892210-G, etc. (New York).

#### Brenner Bros. Fur Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the kidskin plates are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Kung Chen Fur Corpn.*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Ford, J., concurred.

Mollison, J., dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1480, *supra.*
Skip to Content

        -   Log in            -  Log inEmailPassword Show Password	            Remember meAlready have an account? Log in!No account? Sign up!Forgot your password?Didn't receive confirmation instructions? 
        -            -  Forgot your password?Email Already have an account? Log in!No account? Sign up!Forgot your password?Didn't receive confirmation instructions? 
        -            -  Resend confirmation instructionsEmail Already have an account? Log in!No account? Sign up!Forgot your password?Didn't receive confirmation instructions? 
        -   Sign Up            -  Sign upEmail Password Passwords must be at least 6 characters and contain at least one lower-case letter, one upper-case letter, one number, and one punctuation mark or symbolPassword confirmation  Show Password            Already have an account? Log in!No account? Sign up!Forgot your password?Didn't receive confirmation instructions? 

# Search Publications

- Home

#           Sheep and Goats            NASSLog in or Sign Up to subscribe        

----

Frequency of Release:Annually

----

Category:Animals and Animal Products:Livestock

Keywords:breedingfleecegoatslivestocksheepslaughterwool

----

## Releases

            -  « Previous 
            -  Next » 
            -  1 
            -  2 
            -  3 
            -  4 
            -  5 
            -  6 

| Jan 31, 2024 | PDFTXTZIP | Jan 31, 2024: Sheep and Goats detailsx                Jan 31, 2024: Sheep and GoatsRelease datetime:Jan 31, 2024Close |
|--------------|-----------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Contact office name:National Agricultural Statistics Service

Contact email:nass@nass.usda.gov

##         Agency Announcements        
Do you also want to subscribe to all agency announcements from ?
NoYesFooter content with page navigation, site information, and copyright.-  Home 
-  Release Calendar 
×Release CalendarClose
-  About
-  Help 
-  Contact 
-  API 

The USDA Economics, Statistics and Market Information System (ESMIS) contains over 2,100 publications from five agencies of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). These materials cover U.S. and international agriculture and related      topics. Mann Library at Cornell University developed and maintains this site.

© 2024 USDA Economics, Statistics and Market Information System
USDA ESMIS partners list with links to their websites.Partners:- Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
- Economic Research Service (ERS)
- Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS)
- National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS)
- World Agricultural Outlook Board (WAOB)
- 
- Albert R. Mann Library, Cornell University
- United States Department of Agriculture
Cornell development contact information.Developed & supported by:
**Albert R. Mann Library**Cornell UniversityIthaca, NY 14853-4301 Phone: (607) 255-3296 Email: usda-help@cornell.edu
Exhibit 32.2
 
 Statement of Chief Financial Officer Furnished
 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 The undersigned, Gary F. Hoskins, is the Chief Financial Officer of Citizens South Banking Corporation (the “Company”).
 
 This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the Company of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 (the “Report”).
 
 By execution of this statement, I certify that to the best of my knowledge:
 
 A)
the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and
 
 B)
the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods covered by the Report.
 
  August 13, 2010

/s/ Gary F. HoskinsDated

Gary F. HoskinsChief Financial Officer
 
 This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  It is not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
 
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Citizens South Banking Corporation and will be retained by Citizens South Banking Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# San JoaquinValley AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT
October 18,2007 Mr. Mike Guzzetta, Manager Rule Evaluations Section California Air Resources Board P.O. Box 2815 Sacramento, CA 9581 2

Dear Mr. Guzzetta: Attached isthe Rule Action Package for the solvent cleaning portion of eleven District rules,which were adopted by the San Joaquin Valley Air Pollution Control District Governing Board on September 20, 2007. The following District rules were affected: Rule 4603 (Surface Coating of Metal Parts and Products) Rule 4604 (Can and Coil Coating Operations) Rule 4605 (Aerospace Assembly and Component Coating Operations) Rule 4606 (Wood Products Coating Operations) Rule 4607 (Graphic Arts) Rule 4612 (Motor Vehicle and Mobile Equipment Coating Operations 

### - Phase II) Rule 4653 (Adhesives) Rule 4661 (Organic Solvents) Rule 4662 (Organic Solvent Degreasing Operations) Rule 4663 (Organic Solvent Cleaning, Storage, and Disposal) Rule 4684 (Polyester Resin Operations) We request that the California Air Resources Board (ARB) transmit these eleven rules and the appropriate documentation to the Ur~ited States Enviror~mental Protection Agency (EPA) as a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision.

Seyed Sadredin ExecutiveOirectorIAir Pollution Control Officer

Northern Region Central Region(Main Office] Southern Region 4800 EnterpriseWay 1990 E. GettysburgAvenue 2700 M Street, Suite 275 Modesto, CA 95356-8718 Fresno, CA 93726.0244 Bakersfield,CA 93301-2373 Tel: (209) 557-6400 FAX: (209) 557-6475 Tel: (5591230-6000 FAX: (559) 230-6061 Tel: (661)326-6900 FAX: (661)326-6985 www.valleyair.org

Prinled on recycled paper 0

### Mike Guzzetta October 1 

### 8,2007 page 2
Included with this Rule Action Packageare the following attachments: 1. 

### ARB SIP Completeness Checklist 2. ARB APCDIAQMD Rule Evaluation Form 3. Clean Copy of eleven District rules 4. StrikeoutIUnderline Copy of eleven District r~~les 5. Governirrg Board Resolution 6. Evidence of Public Hearing 7. Governing Board Memo 8. Staff Report with appendices. The RuleAction Package is being transmitted by e-mail to ARB staff. If you have any questions, please contact Sandra Lowe-Leseth by phone at (559) 230-5834 or by e-mail at sandra.loweleseth@vaIleyair.org. 

### The District thanks you and yol-lrstaff for your assistance. Sincerelv,

Scott Nester Directorof Planning Attachments
No. 51944.

#### Peping Co. *v.*United States,

protest 22236-K/89045 (Chicago).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Oy Wo Tong Co.*v. *United States*(5 Cust. Ct. 70, C. D. 372). In accordance therewith certain items of the merchandise were held free o£ duty under paragraph 1669 as crude drugs, and other items were held dutiable at 10 percent under paragraph 34 as drugs, advanced.
# C_2017402EN.01003401.xml

| 27.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 402/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 402/34

---

Order of the General Court of 11 October 2017 — Guardian Glass España, Central Vidriera v Commission

(Case T-170/16) (1)

1

((Actions for annulment - State aid - Tax advantages granted by a territorial entity within a Member State - Aid scheme declared to be incompatible with the internal market - Implementation of the decision - Obligation to examine the individual situation of the recipients - Commission’s failure to adopt a position - Act not open to challenge - Inadmissibility))

(2017/C 402/44)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Guardian Glass España, Central Vidriera, SLU (Llodio, Spain) (represented by: M. Araujo Boyd, D. Armesto Macías and A. Lamadrid de Pablo, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: L. Flynn, B. Stromsky and P. Němečková, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking the annulment of the decision of the Commission contained in a document of 15 July 2015 entitled ‘Tax matters in the Basque Country (Álava) — Informal communication regarding additional submissions in connection to compatibility with the 1998 guidelines on national regional aid’.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene lodged by the Kingdom of Spain. |
| --- | --- |

2.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the application for leave to intervene lodged by the Kingdom of Spain.

| 3. | Guardian Glass España, Central Vidriera, SLU is to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Guardian Glass España, Central Vidriera, SLU is to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

| 4. | The Kingdom of Spain is to bear its own costs relating to the application for leave to intervene. |
| --- | --- |

4.

The Kingdom of Spain is to bear its own costs relating to the application for leave to intervene.

---

(1)  OJ C 243, 4.7.2016.

1

---
No. 51337.

#### Protests 57102-K, etc., of Tedman Importing Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries. The protests w-ere sustained to this extent.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 655 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 655

 Calling for Congress to investigate allegations of sexual misconduct 
                        against President Trump.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                           December 11, 2017

Mr. Meeks submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
              Committee on Oversight and Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Calling for Congress to investigate allegations of sexual misconduct 
                        against President Trump.

Whereas gender inequality in America unfortunately and undeniably persists to 
        this day;
Whereas the recent ``Me Too'' movement has empowered women who have been the 
        victims of sexual misconduct;
Whereas we are at a pivotal time in our Nation's history to denounce sexual 
        misconduct;
Whereas Members of Congress have been accused of sexual misconduct;
Whereas allegations against these Members of Congress are being investigated by 
        the Committee on Ethics of the House and the Select Committee on Ethics 
        of the Senate; and
Whereas President Donald J. Trump has been accused of sexual misconduct by 13 
        courageous women: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
Congress should investigate the allegations of sexual misconduct which 
have been made against President Trump, either through an existing 
committee or a committee established for purposes of investigating 
these allegations.
                                 <all>
```
WILLIE DAVID GOLDSMITH, JR.
, Appellant
,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA
, Appellee

. ___________________________/ IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 16

- 4023

Opinion filed April 26, 2017.

An appeal from an order of the Walton County Circuit Court

. Ke l vin C. Wells, Judge.

Andy Thomas, Public Defender, and Laurel Cornell Niles, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee , for App ellant

. Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee

.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRM ED.

ROBERTS, C.J., MAKAR and JAY, JJ.
, CONCUR.
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1395 

To revise the boundaries of certain John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources 

System units in Delaware. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 21, 2017 

Mr. CARPER (for himself and Mr. COONS) introduced the following bill; which 

was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public 

Works 

A BILL 

To revise the boundaries of certain John H. Chafee Coastal 

Barrier Resources System units in Delaware. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPLACEMENT OF JOHN H. CHAFEE COASTAL 

4 BARRIER RESOURCES SYSTEM MAP. 

5 (a) IN GENERAL.—The map subtitled ‘‘Delaware 

6 Seashore Unit DE–07P, North Bethany Beach Unit 

7 H01’’ and dated December 6, 2013, that is included in 

8 the set of maps entitled ‘‘Coastal Barrier Resources Sys9 tem’’ referred to in section 4(a) of the Coastal Barrier 

10 Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(a)) and relating to certain 


SSpencer on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1395 IS

1 John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier Resources System units 

2 in the State of Delaware, is replaced by the map entitled 

3 ‘‘Delaware Seashore Unit DE–07/DE–07P, North Beth4 any Beach Unit H01’’ and dated March 16, 2016. 

5 (b) AVAILABILITY.—The Secretary of the Interior 

6 shall keep the replacement map referred to in subsection 

7 (a) on file and available for inspection in accordance with 

8 section 4(b) of the Coastal Barrier Resources Act (16 

9 U.S.C. 3503(b)). 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 WESTERN
RESERVE BANCORP, INC.
 FORM 10-QSB
Quarter ended June 30, 2005
 CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Western Reserve Bancorp, Inc.;
 2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;
 3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;
 4.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e) for the small business issuer and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
the period in which this report is being prepared;
 (b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and
 (c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most
recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers
auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and
 (b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over
financial reporting.
 Date: August 15, 2005
    
    /s/ Edward J. McKeonEdward J. McKeon, President and CEO
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1337 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1337

To amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to make certain strategic energy 
 infrastructure projects eligible for certain loan guarantees, and for 
                            other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 12, 2017

  Mr. Manchin (for himself and Mrs. Capito) introduced the following 
bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and 
                           Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to make certain strategic energy 
 infrastructure projects eligible for certain loan guarantees, and for 
                            other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Capitalizing on American Storage 
Potential Act''.

SEC. 2. STRATEGIC ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE PROJECTS.

    Section 1703 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 16513) is 
amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) in paragraph (2), by striking ``in subsection 
                (d))'' and inserting ``described in subsection (d) and 
                strategic energy infrastructure meeting the criteria 
                described in subsection (f))''; and
                    (B) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(11) Strategic energy infrastructure meeting the criteria 
        described in subsection (f).''; and
            (2) by adding at the end the following:
    ``(f) Strategic Energy Infrastructure Projects.--The Secretary may 
make guarantees under this section for any strategic energy 
infrastructure project that is a regional project--
            ``(1) that supports a more effective energy market 
        performance due to the scale of the project, such as a project 
        with the capacity to store and distribute greater than 100,000 
        barrels per day of hydrocarbon feedstock with a minimum gross 
        heating value of 1,700 Btu per standard cubic foot; and
            ``(2) with the potential to significantly contribute to the 
        economic resilience of the region in which the project is 
        located.''.
                                 <all>
```