alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

: CIVIL ACTION NOS.

:

WULFECK : 02-3893

WARREN : 02-3898

CHARNOCK. : 02-3970

MOHR : 02-4117

PALLERA, et al. : 02-4170

CORREA, et al. : 02-4195

DAHL, et al. : 02-4239

EMERSON, et al. : 02-4290

JUROTICH : 02-4322

:

VS. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION, et al. :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of July, 2002, the Court having been previously

advised that the above action cannot proceed to trial and disposition because of the following

reason:

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending disposition of a related

action.

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending determination of

arbitration proceedings.

[ ] - Interlocutory appeal filed.

[ X ] - Other: Case is placed into suspense pending receipt of the Case

Transfer Order from the Judicial Panel on Multi District Litigation

transferring case to District of Minnesota..

It is

ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this action closed for statistical purposes and

place the matter in the Civil Suspense File, and it is

Case 2:02-cv-04322-CN Document 2 Filed 07/11/2002 Page 1 of 2
FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction; and that the case be

restored to the trial docket when the action is in a status so that it may proceed to final

disposition; this order shall not prejudice the rights of the parties to this litigation.

BY THE COURT:

________________________________________

Clarence C. Newcomer, Judge

Case 2:02-cv-04322-CN Document 2 Filed 07/11/2002 Page 2 of 2
# C_2018042EN.01002001.xml

| 5.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 42/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 42/20

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 December 2017 — Trautmann v EEAS

(Case T-611/16) (1)

1

((Civil service - Officials - Remuneration - Family allowances - Education allowance - Article 15 of Annex X to the Staff Regulations - Conditions for grant - Article 3(1) of Annex VII to the Staff Regulations - Regular full-time attendance at an educational establishment which charges fees - Article 85 of the Staff Regulations - Recovery of sums overpaid - Obligation to state reasons - Right to be heard))

(2018/C 042/28)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Ernst Ulrich Trautmann (Kraainem, Belgium) (represented by: M. Meyer, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European External Action Service (EEAS) (represented by: S. Marquardt and R. Weiss, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application based on Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, the annulment (i) of the decision of the appointing authority of the EEAS of 18 November 2015 to reassess the amount of the education allowance due to the applicant, (ii) of the decision of the Office for the Administration and Payment of Individual Entitlements (PMO) of 12 January 2016 to recover, by means of deductions from pay, the sums unduly paid to the applicant, (iii) of the decision of 12 May 2016 rejecting the complaints against those decisions, and, second, and an order requiring the EEAS to return to the applicant the sums previously paid in accordance with his right to the education allowance.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Ernst Ulrich Trautmann to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Ernst Ulrich Trautmann to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 371, 10.10.2016 (case initially registered before the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union under the number F-41/16 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1.9.2016).

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Duke Capital Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Keith G. Butler, Controller and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully
complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|Date: August 14, 2003 |  |  |  |  |  | /s/    KEITH G. BUTLER
|--------------------- |  |  |  |  |  | ----------------------
|                      |  |  |  |  |  |                       





53
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 56 Filed 05/30/2003 Page 1 of 33
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 56 Filed 05/30/2003 Page 2 of 33
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 56 Filed 05/30/2003 Page 3 of 33
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 56 Filed 05/30/2003 Page 4 of 33
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 56 Filed 05/30/2003 Page 5 of 33
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 56 Filed 05/30/2003 Page 6 of 33
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 56 Filed 05/30/2003 Page 7 of 33
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 56 Filed 05/30/2003 Page 8 of 33
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 56 Filed 05/30/2003 Page 9 of 33
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 56 Filed 05/30/2003 Page 10 of 33
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 56 Filed 05/30/2003 Page 11 of 33
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 56 Filed 05/30/2003 Page 12 of 33
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 56 Filed 05/30/2003 Page 13 of 33
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 56 Filed 05/30/2003 Page 14 of 33
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 56 Filed 05/30/2003 Page 15 of 33
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 56 Filed 05/30/2003 Page 16 of 33
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 56 Filed 05/30/2003 Page 17 of 33
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 56 Filed 05/30/2003 Page 18 of 33
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 56 Filed 05/30/2003 Page 19 of 33
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 56 Filed 05/30/2003 Page 20 of 33
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 56 Filed 05/30/2003 Page 21 of 33
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 56 Filed 05/30/2003 Page 22 of 33
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 56 Filed 05/30/2003 Page 23 of 33
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 56 Filed 05/30/2003 Page 24 of 33
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 56 Filed 05/30/2003 Page 25 of 33
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 56 Filed 05/30/2003 Page 26 of 33
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 56 Filed 05/30/2003 Page 27 of 33
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 56 Filed 05/30/2003 Page 28 of 33
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 56 Filed 05/30/2003 Page 29 of 33
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 56 Filed 05/30/2003 Page 30 of 33
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 56 Filed 05/30/2003 Page 31 of 33
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 56 Filed 05/30/2003 Page 32 of 33
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 56 Filed 05/30/2003 Page 33 of 33
No. 62488.

#### Bel Paese Sales Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 324552-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
Before the Second Division,

March 27, 1968

No. P68/181.

protest 66/23167 (New York).

#### Soderhamn Machine Manufacturing Company *v.*United States,

*1028Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of Cambio debark-ers and parts thereof similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Soderhamn Machine Mfg. Co.*v. *United States*(54 Cust. Ct. 369, Abstract 69205), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE: ASBESTOS PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

This document relates to:

 : CIVIL ACTION

02-2635 SHIRK : NO. MDL 875

02-2735 WATSON :

02-2736 HOOD :

02-2737 HART :

02-2738 JOHNSON :

02-2681 SHIRK :

02-2845 KINIUK :

02-3166 HRYCYK :

02-3168 GREEN :

02-3169 SAKEWICZ :

02-3170 HENDRICKS :

02-3171 PALMER :

02-3172 BERRY :

02-3175 SOLOMON :

02-3176 ROMANOWSKI :

02-3177 O’DONNELL :

02-3448 HARTMANN :

02-3449 ROCKS :

02-3450 REED :

02-3451 GAMBLER :

02-3452 MACAULEY :

02-3630 ALIBERT :

02-3631 VISCO :

02-3632 DANCSECS :

02-3847 HAMMOND :

02-3848 POTTER :

02-4095 SMITH :

02-4096 SEARFOSS :

02-4097 GEARINGER :

02-4101 FRYE :

02-4339 MEYER :

Case 2:02-cv-04095-ER Document 5 Filed 08/05/2002 Page 1 of 2
O R D E R

The Court having been advised that the issues raised in

each of these actions are also presently pending before the

Honorable District Court Judge Alfred Wolin. Judge Wolin has

been specially designated to sit in the District of Delaware and

preside over these matters. Further, the Judge has set a

schedule and will proceed appropriately. In the interest of

judicial economy and for a prompt resolution of all outstanding

issues this Court will hold its action in abeyance and await the

ruling by the Bankruptcy Court.

IT IS THEREFORE THE ORDER OF THIS COURT that all

pending motions for abstention and remand are denied without

prejudice at this time with leave to renew at a later date. The

cases are administratively dismissed, subject to reinstatement

following the determination of the bankruptcy issues by Judge

Wolin and any subsequent appeals thereto.

Done this 5th day of August, 2002.

 BY THE COURT

 

Charles R. Weiner, SJ

Case 2:02-cv-04095-ER Document 5 Filed 08/05/2002 Page 2 of 2
# C_2019072EN.01001701.xml

| 25.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 72/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 72/17

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 December 2018 — Syriatel Mobile Telecom v Council

(Case T-411/16) (1)

((Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures taken against Syria - Freezing of funds - Rights of the defence - Right to effective judicial protection - Obligation to state reasons - Manifest error of assessment - Right to honour and reputation - Right to property - Presumption of innocence - Proportionality))

(2019/C 72/21)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Syriatel Mobile Telecom (Joint Stock Company) (Damascus, Syria) (represented by: E. Ruchat, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: initially, S. Kyriakopoulou, A. Vitro and G. Étienne, subsequently S. Kyriakopoulou, A. Vitro and V. Piessevaux, and finally S. Kyriakopoulou and A. Vitro, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Council Decision (CFSP) 2016/850 of 27 May 2016 amending Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2016 L 141, p. 125) and of the subsequent measures giving effect to that decision, of Council Decision (CFSP) 2017/917 of 29 May 2017 amending Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2017 L 139, p. 62), and of Council Decision (CFSP) 2018/778 of 28 May 2018 amending Decision 2013/255/CFSP concerning restrictive measures against Syria (OJ 2018 L 131, p. 16), in so far as those acts concern the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Syriatel Mobile Telecom (Joint Stock Company) to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Syriatel Mobile Telecom (Joint Stock Company) to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ C 364, 3.10.2016.

---
# C_2015118EN.01003701.xml

| 13.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/37

---

Action brought on 12 February 2015 — Trajektna luka Split v Commission

(Case T-70/15)

(2015/C 118/47)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Trajektna luka Split d.d. (Split, Croatia) (represented by: M. Bauer, H. Freund and S. Hankiewicz, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the Commission decision C(2014) 9236 final of 28 November 2014 on case AT.40199 Port of Split; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the Commission decision C(2014) 9236 final of 28 November 2014 on case AT.40199 Port of Split;

| — | order the Commission to bear its own costs and those of the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to bear its own costs and those of the applicant;

| — | refer the case back to the European Commisison for further investigation and renewed decision; and |
| --- | --- |

—

refer the case back to the European Commisison for further investigation and renewed decision; and

| — | take such other or further actions as justice may require. |
| --- | --- |

—

take such other or further actions as justice may require.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging a manifest error in assessment and error of law by infringing the Commission’s obligations in handling a complaint by incorrectly assessing the European Union interest with regard to all three reasons brought forward by the Commission; |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging a manifest error in assessment and error of law by infringing the Commission’s obligations in handling a complaint by incorrectly assessing the European Union interest with regard to all three reasons brought forward by the Commission;

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging a manifest error of assessment and error of law by infringing the Commission’s obligations in handling a complaint, in particular failing to take into consideration all relevant matters of law and fact. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging a manifest error of assessment and error of law by infringing the Commission’s obligations in handling a complaint, in particular failing to take into consideration all relevant matters of law and fact.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF HORIZON
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AS OF MARCH 31, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           8,748
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   13,819
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      1,646
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                29,400
<PP&E>                                         179,730
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (11,582)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 201,461
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,250
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,119
<OTHER-SE>                                      87,735
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   201,461
<SALES>                                         15,906
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,906
<CGS>                                           14,781
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,791
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,768
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2,555)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       869
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (1,686)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                        1,381
<NET-INCOME>                                      (305)
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.02
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.02


</TABLE>
Before the First Division,

July 26, 1945

No. 50379.

#### Petition 6286-R of R. Haber Linen Import Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

At the trial the customhouse broker who prepared the entry in question testified that the undervaluation resulted from an oversight on his part. In preparing the entry an incorrect figure was used, it being overlooked that an item for unsatisfactory goods had no relation to the value of the goods covered by the invoice in question. It was held that the record clearly showed an entire lack of intention to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or to misrepresent the facts of the case or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore granted.
### Summary of Adopted and Approved Criteria in New Jersey that are less Stringent than the NTR Pollutant Aquatic Life Freshwater Aquatic Life Saltwater Human Health (10 - 6 ) CMC (B1) CCC (B2) CMC (C1) CCC (C2) W&O (D1) O only

( D2) 6. Copper NTR 2.4 2.4 NJ **4.8 3.1**  7. Lead NTR 2.5 8.1 NJ **5.4 24**  8. Mercury NTR 0.01 0.025 NJ **0.77 0.94**  9. Nickel NTR 8.2 NJ **22** 3 0. 1,1
- Dichloroethy lene NTR 3.2 NJ **100** 37. 1,1,2,2
- Tetrachloroethane NTR 11 NJ **110** 42. 1,1,2
- Trichloroethane NTR 42 NJ **350** 93 . Isophrone NTR 600 NJ **960** 105. gamma
- BHC NTR 0.019 0.063 NJ **0.98 1.8** 

### Summary of Remaining NTR Criteria in New Jersey Substance Aquatic L ife Freshwater Aqua tic L ife S altwater Human Health CMC CCC CMC CCC W&O O only **4. Copper -**  **(304a) -**  **(304a) 5. Lead**  - - **6. Mercury -**  **(304a) -**  **(304a) 7. Nickel** 
- **12. 1,1 -**  **Dichloroethylene -**  **(304a) 13. 1,1,2,2**  **- Tetrachloroetha**  **ne** - **14. 1,1,2 -**  **Trichloroethane**
- **17. Isophrone -**  **(304a) 18. gamma**  **- BHC**  **- (304a)**  **- (304a)** 

- (304a): New Jersey

criteria less stringent than the NTR criteria, but as or more stringent than the current EPA 304( a) criteria. EPA must take comment, but the rationale is strong.

- : New Jersey

criteria less stringent than both the NTR criteria and current EPA 304(a) criteria. EPA must take comment, and additional explanation is required.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 213 (Monday, November 6, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 76188]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-24425]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[RTID 0648-XD435]


Determination of Overfishing or an Overfished Condition

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This action serves as a notice that NMFS, on behalf of the 
Secretary of Commerce (Secretary), has found that summer flounder is 
now subject to overfishing and thorny skate remains overfished. NMFS, 
on behalf of the Secretary, is required to provide this notice whenever 
it determines that a stock or stock complex is subject to overfishing, 
overfished, or approaching an overfished condition.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Caroline Potter, (301) 427-8522.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 304(e)(2) of the 
Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act, 16 U.S.C. 
1854(e)(2), NMFS, on behalf of the Secretary, must publish a notice in 
the Federal Register whenever it determines that a stock or stock 
complex is subject to overfishing, overfished, or approaching an 
overfished condition.
    NMFS has determined that summer flounder is now subject to 
overfishing. The summer flounder determination is based on the most 
recent assessment, completed in 2023, using data through 2022, which 
indicates that the stock is subject to overfishing because the fishing 
mortality rate is greater than the maximum fishing mortality threshold. 
NMFS has notified the Mid-Atlantic Fishery Management Council of the 
requirement to end overfishing of summer flounder.
    NMFS has determined that thorny skate remains overfished. The 
thorny skate determination is based on an update assessment completed 
in 2022, using data through 2021, which indicates that the stock 
remains overfished because the 2-year average biomass index is less 
than the minimum stock size threshold. NMFS continues to work with the 
New England Fishery Management Council to rebuild thorny skate.

    Dated: October 31, 2023.
Jennifer M. Wallace,
Acting Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National Marine 
Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2023-24425 Filed 11-3-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS4559 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION**In connection with the Quarterly Report of Midwest Banc Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onNovember 9, 2007 (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.         /s/ James J. Giancola         Name: James J. Giancola    Title: President and
# C_2017283EN.01004902.xml

| 28.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 283/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 283/49

---

Order of the General Court of 5 July 2017 — EEB v Commission

(Case T-38/16) (1)

1

((Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents concerning the withdrawal of Proposal COM(2014) 397 final for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council - Partial refusal of access - No need to adjudicate))

(2017/C 283/76)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Environmental Bureau (EEB) (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: B. Kloostra, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Buchet, F. Clotuche-Duvieusart and E. Sanfrutos Cano, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Commission Decision Ares(2015) 5212500 of 19 November 2015.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the present action.

| 2. | The European Commission is to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Environmental Bureau (EEB). |
| --- | --- |

2.

The European Commission is to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Environmental Bureau (EEB).

---

(1)  OJ C 118, 4.4.2016.

1

---