alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1








Section 1350 Certification





In connection with the Annual Report of AnythingIT, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, David Bernstein, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial conditions and results of operations of the Company.   /s/ David BernsteinAugust 22, 2012

David Bernstein, Chief Executive Officer, principal executive officer





A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Before the Second Division,

May 28, 1963

No. 67774.

#### Gimbel Bros., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 61/13969 (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of traveling irons similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Greatrew, Limited,*and *J. J. Gavin & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 79, C.D. 1639), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
EXHIBIT 32.2

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of GMX Resources Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |                                         
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------
|Date: March 16, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ James A. Merrill                    
|                     |  |  |  | James A. Merrill Chief
Financial Officer
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Roger K. Brooks, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of AmerUs Group Co.,certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of AmerUs Group Co.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statementof a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared; b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and34-47986]; c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the endof the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter inthe case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or isreasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of theregistrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.
Dated: November 4, 2004     By /s/ Roger K. Brooks           Roger K. Brooks        Chairman and Chief Executive Officer        AmerUs Group Co.
# C_2019155EN.01003701.xml

| 6.5.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.5.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/37

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 March 2019 — Perry Ellis International Group v EUIPO (PRO PLAYER)

(Case T-220/16) (1)

(EU trade mark - Application for EU word mark PRO PLAYER - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

(2019/C 155/43)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Perry Ellis International Group Holdings Ltd (Nassau, Bahamas) (represented by: O. Günzel and C. Tenkhoff, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Rampini and K. Markakis, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 24 February 2016 (Case R 1091/2015-2), relating to an application for registration of the word sign PRO PLAYER as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Perry Ellis International Group Holdings Ltd to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Perry Ellis International Group Holdings Ltd to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

---

(1)  OJ C 232, 27.6.2016.

---
# C_2016335EN.01003202.xml

| 12.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 335/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 335/32

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny (Poland) lodged on 30 May 2016 — Kozuba Premium Selection sp. z o.o., established in Warsaw, v Dyrektor Izby Skarbowej w Warszawie

(Case C-308/16)

(2016/C 335/43)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Referring court

Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Kozuba Premium Selection sp. z o.o., established in Warsaw

Appellant:

Respondent: Dyrektor Izby Skarbowej w Warszawie

Respondent:

Question referred

Question referred

Must Article 135(1)(j) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (1) be interpreted as precluding a national provision (point 10 of Article 43(1) of the Ustawa o podatku od towarów i usług [Law on the tax on goods and services] of 11 March 2004 [Dz. U. No 54, item 535, as amended; ‘the Law on VAT’]) under which the supply of buildings, civil engineering works or parts thereof is exempt from VAT save where:

1

| (a) | the supply is made within the framework of the first occupation or prior to the first occupation, |
| --- | --- |

(a)

the supply is made within the framework of the first occupation or prior to the first occupation,

| (b) | the period between the first occupation and the supply of the building, civil engineering works or parts thereof was shorter than 2 years, insofar as point 14 of Article 2 of the Law on VAT defines first occupation as release for use of buildings, civil engineering works or parts thereof, in performance of taxable activities, to the first customer or user, following their:






  (a) | erection or |
| --- | --- | --- |

(b)

the period between the first occupation and the supply of the building, civil engineering works or parts thereof was shorter than 2 years, insofar as point 14 of Article 2 of the Law on VAT defines first occupation as release for use of buildings, civil engineering works or parts thereof, in performance of taxable activities, to the first customer or user, following their:

(a)

erection or

| (b) | upgrade, if the expenditure incurred for the upgrade, as defined in the regulations on income tax, constituted at least 30 % of the initial value? |
| --- | --- |

(b)

upgrade, if the expenditure incurred for the upgrade, as defined in the regulations on income tax, constituted at least 30 % of the initial value?

---

(1)  OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1.

1

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 93 (Tuesday, May 14, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Pages 28274-28275]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-11488]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8323]

Culturally Significant Object Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``1763: A Revolutionary Peace''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000 (and, as appropriate, Delegation of Authority 
No. 257 of April 15, 2003), I hereby determine that the object to be 
included in the exhibition ``1763: A Revolutionary Peace,'' imported 
from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, is of 
cultural significance. The object is imported pursuant to a loan 
agreement with the foreign owner or custodian. I also

[[Page 28275]]

determine that the exhibition or display of the exhibit object at the 
Old State House Museum, Boston, Massachusetts, from on or about June 7, 
2013, until on or about October 7, 2013, and at possible additional 
exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is in the national 
interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these Determinations be 
published in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
description of the exhibit object, contact Paul W. Manning, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 202-632-6469). The mailing address is U.S. Department of 
State, SA-5, L/PD, Fifth Floor (Suite 5H03), Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: May 7, 2013.
J. Adam Ereli,
Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and 
Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2013-11488 Filed 5-13-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
Case 2:05-cv-00417-MAM Document 249 Filed 09/30/09 Page 1 of 1
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 132 

To amend title 54, United States Code, to provide for congressional and 

State approval of national monuments and restrictions on the use of 

national monuments. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JANUARY 12, 2017 

Mr. CRAPO (for himself, Mr. LEE, Mr. RISCH, and Mr. RUBIO) introduced the 

following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend title 54, United States Code, to provide for congressional and State approval of national monuments 

and restrictions on the use of national monuments. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘National Monument 

5 Designation Transparency and Accountability Act of 

6 2017’’. 

7 SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF NATIONAL MONUMENTS. 

8 Section 320301 of title 54, United States Code, is 

9 amended— 

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS

2 

•S 132 IS

1 (1) in subsection (a), by striking ‘‘The Presi2 dent may’’ and inserting ‘‘After obtaining congres3 sional approval of the proposed national monument, 

4 certifying compliance with the National Environ5 mental Policy Act of 1969 (42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.) 

6 with respect to the proposed national monument, 

7 and determining that the State in which the pro8 posed national monument is to be located has en9 acted legislation approving the designation of the 

10 proposed national monument, the President may’’; 

11 and 

12 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

13 ‘‘(e) RESTRICTIONS ON PUBLIC USE.—The Secretary 

14 shall not implement any restrictions on the public use of 

15 a national monument until the expiration of an appro16 priate review period (as determined by the Secretary) pro17 viding for public input and congressional approval.’’. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20
- 6759

BLAKE SANDLAIN , Petitioner

- Appellant ,

v. BARBARA RICKARD, Warden , Respondent

- Appellee

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia , at Bluefield

. David A. Faber , Senior District Judge. ( 1:19

- cv
- 00072 )

Submitted : July 21, 2020 Decided: July 24, 2020

Before AGEE, DIAZ, and HARRIS , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Blake Sandlain, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Blake Sandlain, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denyi ng his motion for relief from judgment following the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (201 8 ) petition

. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Sandlain v. Rickard , No. 1:19

- cv
- 00072 (S.D.W. Va. May 14, 2020) . We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Office of Personnel Management

# AGENCY:

President's Commission on White House Fellowships, Office of Personnel Management.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The President's Commission on White House Fellowships (PCWHF) was established by an executive order in 1964. The PCWHF is an advisory committee composed of Special Government Employees appointed by the President.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Rosemarie Vela, 712 Jackson Place NW, Washington, DC 20503, Phone: 202-395-4522.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

*Name of Committee:*                     President's Commission on White House Fellowships Mid-Year Meeting.                

*Date:*                     January 19, 2024.                

*Time:*                     8 a.m.-5:30 p.m.                

*Place*                     Eisenhower Executive Office Building, 1650 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20500.                

*Agenda:*                     The Commission holds a mid-year meeting to talk with current Fellows on how their placements are going and discuss preparation for future events.                

*Authority:*                     Executive Orders 11183 and 14109.                

Office of Personnel Management.

Kayyonne Marston,

Federal Register Liaison.

[FR Doc. 2023-25060 Filed 11-14-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6325-69-P
Before the First Division,

March 11, 1954

No. 57901.

protest 217556-K (Los Angeles).

#### New York Merchandise Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of articles in chief value of glass beads the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Walco Bead Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(29 Cust Ct. 62, C. D. 1445), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 49975.

#### Protests 81674-K, etc., of Barotz Import Co., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It was stipulated that the beads in question are not in imitation of precious or semiprecious stones and are similar to those involved in *Eitinger Bead Co.*v. *United States*(13 Cust. Ct. 50, C. D. 867). In accordance therewith the claim at 35 percent under paragraph 1503 was sustained.
# C_2018094EN.01001801.xml

| 12.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/18

---

Judgment of the General Court of 25 January 2018 — Italy v Commission

(Case T-91/16) (1)

1

((ESF - Operational programme for objective No 1 for the Region of Sicily - Reduction of the financial assistance initially granted - Calculation by extrapolation - Proportionality - Article 39(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 - Obligation to state reasons))

(2018/C 094/22)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Italian Republic (represented by: G. Palmieri, acting as Agent, and P. Gentili, avvocato dello Stato)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Arenas and F. Tomat, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application on the basis of Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of Commission Decision C(2015) 9413 of 17 December 2015 concerning the reduction of the European Social Fund (ESF) [contribution] for the operational programme for the Region of Sicily, which forms part of the Community support framework for structural interventions in the Italian regions covered by objective No 1 (CCI 1999IT 161PO011).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Italian Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 136, 18.4.2016.

1

---
M14004 – Chemical 2 

Part II, Section A.2 and A.3 – Industrial Sites Controlled by Submitter 

Occupational Exposure and Environmental Release and Disposal Page 1 of 1 

CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION REMOVED
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of Appeals3056322-NOV-201108:19 AM
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 780 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 780

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                        March 15, 2018.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the bill (H.R. 4061) to amend the Financial Stability Act 
of 2010 to improve the transparency of the Financial Stability Oversight 
Council, to improve the SIFI designation process, and for other purposes. All 
points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. An amendment in 
the nature of a substitute consisting of the text of Rules Committee Print 115-
64, modified by the amendment printed in part A of the report of the Committee 
on Rules accompanying this resolution, shall be considered as adopted. The bill, 
as amended, shall be considered as read. All points of order against provisions 
in the bill, as amended, are waived. The previous question shall be considered 
as ordered on the bill, as amended, and on any further amendment thereto, to 
final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally 
divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee 
on Financial Services; and (2) one motion to recommit with or without 
instructions.
    Sec. 2.  Upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to consider 
in the House the bill (H.R. 4293) to reform the Comprehensive Capital Analysis 
and Review process, the Dodd-Frank Act Stress Test process, and for other 
purposes. All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. In 
lieu of the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee 
on Financial Services now printed in the bill, an amendment in the nature of a 
substitute consisting of the text of Rules Committee Print 115-63, modified by 
the amendment printed in part B of the report of the Committee on Rules 
accompanying this resolution, shall be considered as adopted. The bill, as 
amended, shall be considered as read. All points of order against provisions in 
the bill, as amended, are waived. The previous question shall be considered as 
ordered on the bill, as amended, and on any further amendment thereto, to final 
passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate equally 
divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee 
on Financial Services; and (2) one motion to recommit with or without 
instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.1

HORIZON OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Bill J. Lam, Chief Executive Officer of Horizon Offshore, Inc. (the
Company), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

1.     The Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March
31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company for the period covered by such Report.

|                   |  |                        
|------------------ |  | -----------------------
|Date: May 14, 2003 |  | /s/ Bill J. Lam        
|                   |  |                        
|                   |  | Bill J. Lam            
|                   |  | Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Horizon Offshore, Inc. and will be retained by Horizon Offshore,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.