alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 53952.

#### Tropical Craft Corp. *v.*United States,

protests 147580-K, 149891-K, and 152353-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of sisal handbags similar in all material respects *351to those the subject of *United States*v. *Goldberg & Seltzer, Inc.*(36 C. C. P. A. 64, C. A. D. 399), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

CHRISTINE L. MORRISON : CIVIL ACTION

:

:

v. :

:

JO ANNE BARNHART, : NO. 05-0352

Commissioner, Social Security, :

Administration :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 21st day of September 2005, upon consideration of the parties’ cross

motions for summary judgment and responses thereto, Magistrate Judge Smith’s Report and

Recommendation, defendant’s objections, and plaintiff’s response thereto, it is ORDERED as

follows:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.

2. Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is DENIED.

3. Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.

4. The case is REMANDED to the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration,

pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for further proceedings consistent with

the Report and Recommendation.

s/ Thomas N. O’Neill, Jr.

THOMAS N. O’NEILL, JR., J.

Case 2:05-cv-00352-TON Document 12 Filed 09/21/05 Page 1 of 1
Before the Second Division,

March 26, 1968

No. P68/177.

protests 66/12101, etc. (New York).

#### L. Batlin & Son, Inc. *v.*United States,

*1027Nao, *G.J.*

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of battery-operated mixers similar in all material respects to those the subject of *F.B. Vandegrift &*Co., *Inc.*v. *United States*(53 Cust. Ct. 231, Abstract 68674), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 52496.

protest 78452-K (San Francisco).

#### Pacific Dry Goods Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the merchandise invoiced as “combining blocks” in cases 2679, 2686, 2687, 2689, 2698, 2711, and 2712, and the merchandise invoiced as “puzzle toys” in case B 464 is not chiefly used for the amusement of children and that it consists of manufactures of wood. It was held that these items are dutiable at 33% percent under paragraph 412, as claimed. Merchandise invoiced as “cone incense” and “butterfly incense” in cases B 470 and B 471, respectively, stipulated to consist of joss stick or joss light, was held entitled to free entry under paragraph 1703.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification of Nevada Classic Thoroughbreds, Inc.  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  regarding Annual Report on Form 10-KSB  for the year ended June 30, 2005**

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title  18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Nevada Classic  Thoroughbreds, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), doeshereby certify that, based upon his knowledge:

1. The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended    June 30, 2005 (the "Form 10-KSB") fully complies with the    requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. Information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of  the Company.

> 
 

| Dated: July 25, 2005 | By: /s/ Brad Brimhall   |
|----------------------|-------------------------|
|                 |                         |
|                 | Brad Brimhall           |
|                 | Chief Executive Officer |

>
Comment Info: =================

General Comment:Dir. ID 2009-NM-020-AD
Significant Subsidiaries

         The following table sets forth all of the direct and indirect
significant subsidiaries of Gemplus International S.A.:

<TABLE>

Name of Company                                                                Percentage Owned
---------------                                                                ----------------
<S>                                                                                <C>
Gemplus S.A., a French corporation...........................................        93.0%(1)
Gemplus GmbH, a German corporation...........................................       100.0%
Gemplus Limited, a British corporation.......................................       100.0%
Gemplus Microelectronics S.A., a French corporation..........................       100.0%
Gemplus Technologies Asie Limited, a Singapore corporation...................       100.0%
Gemplus Microelectronics Asia Limited, a Singapore corporation...............       100.0%
Tianjin Gemplus Smart Card Company Limited, a Chinese corporation............        51.0%
Gemplus Tianjin New Technologies Company Limited, a Chinese corporation......       100.0%
Gemplus Corporation, a Delaware corporation..................................       100.0%
Gemplus Card International de Mexico S.A. de C.V., a Mexican corporation.....       100.0%
SkiData AG, an Austrian corporation..........................................        80.0%
Gemplus Finance S.A., a Luxembourg corporation...............................       100.0%
Zenzus Holdings Limited, a Gibraltar corporation.............................       100.0%
--------------------------
</TABLE>

(1)  The remaining shares are mainly held by the employees of Gemplus
     International S.A. pursuant to the exercise of stock options, who may
     contribute, from time to time, to Gemplus International S.A. the shares of
     Gemplus S.A. received upon exercise of these options in exchange for shares
     of Gemplus International S.A.
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 32 (Thursday, February 16, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 9219]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-3652]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

DOE/NSF Nuclear Science Advisory Committee

AGENCY: Department of Energy, Office of Science.

ACTION: Notice of open meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This notice announces a meeting of the DOE/NSF Nuclear Science 
Advisory Committee (NSAC). The Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 
92-463, 86 Stat. 770) requires that public notice of these meetings be 
announced in the Federal Register.

DATES: Friday, March 9, 2012, 9 a.m.-5 p.m.

ADDRESSES: Marriott Bethesda North Hotel & Conference Center, 5701 
Marinelli Road, North Bethesda, Maryland 20852, (301) 822-9200.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Brenda L. May, U.S. Department of 
Energy; SC-26/Germantown Building, 1000 Independence Avenue SW., 
Washington, DC 20585-1290; Telephone: (301) 903-0536

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice and guidance to the 
Department of Energy and the National Science Foundation on scientific 
priorities within the field of basic nuclear science research.
    Tentative Agenda: Agenda will include discussions of the following:

Friday, March 9, 2012

 Perspectives from Department of Energy and National Science 
Foundation
 Update from the Department of Energy and National Science 
Foundation's Nuclear Physics Office's
 Presentation of Plans for a Charge for Nuclear Science 
Community Planning
 Report on the Fundamental Physics at the Intensity Frontier 
Workshop
 Status on the Creation of a Strategic Plan on Accelerator 
Science
 Report on National Ignition Facility Workshop
 Public Comment (10-minute rule)
    Public Participation: The meeting is open to the public. If you 
would like to file a written statement with the Committee, you may do 
so either before or after the meeting. If you would like to make oral 
statements regarding any of these items on the agenda, you should 
contact Brenda L. May, (301) 903-0536 or by email at: 
Brenda.May@science.doe.gov. You must make your request for an oral 
statement at least 5 business days before the meeting. Reasonable 
provision will be made to include the scheduled oral statements on the 
agenda. The Chairperson of the Committee will conduct the meeting to 
facilitate the orderly conduct of business. Public comment will follow 
the 10-minute rule.
    Minutes: The minutes of the meeting will be available on the 
Nuclear Science Advisory Committee Web site at: http://www.science.energy.gov/np/nsac.

    Issued at Washington, DC, on February 10, 2012.
LaTanya Butler,
Acting Deputy Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2012-3652 Filed 2-15-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6450-01-P
```
Exhibit 32.1




CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350




I, Scott D. Dorfman, Chief Executive Officer of Innotrac
Corporation (the Company), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 as adopted by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:


|(1) |  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter
ended September 30, 2007 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and
|--- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------






|Dated: November
14, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Scott D. Dorfman Scott D. Dorfman President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board
|------------------------ |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



32


---
No. 63577.

protests 306642-K and 318964-K (New York).

#### Maximlock, Ltd., and Maximlock Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of iron or steel rivets the same as those the subject of *Brammer Vee Link Belting, Inc.*v. *United States*(40 Cust. Ct. 1, C.D. 1947), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
Exhibit 27:                 Financial Data Schedule

THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

</LEGEND>

<S>                                                    <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                          6-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                      dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                           jun-30-1999
<CASH>                                                 3,004,591
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                          4,847,853
<ALLOWANCES>                                           180,923
<INVENTORY>                                            6,880,146
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                       15,078,685
<PP&E>                                                 5,674,081
<DEPRECIATION>                                         3,000,151
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                         19,058,663
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                  8,187,701
<BONDS>                                                0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                               5,156,197
<OTHER-SE>                                             3,381,705
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                           19,058,663
<SALES>                                                9,518,017
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                       9,518,017
<CGS>                                                  5,973,239
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                          3,242,167
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                     90,289
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                        212,322
<INCOME-TAX>                                           67,481
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                    144,841
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                        0
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                           144,841
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0.05
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0.04


</TABLE>
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1128 

To expand the Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response grant 

program to include grants for the support of changing the status of 

part-time or paid-on-call firefighters to full-time firefighters, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 16, 2017 

Mr. PETERS (for himself and Ms. COLLINS) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs 

A BILL 

To expand the Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency 

Response grant program to include grants for the support of changing the status of part-time or paid-oncall firefighters to full-time firefighters, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Firefighters Retention 

5 Act of 2017’’. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1128 IS

1 SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF STAFFING FOR ADEQUATE FIRE 

2 AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE GRANT PRO3 GRAM. 

4 Section 34(a)(1)(B) of the Federal Fire Prevention 

5 and Control Act of 1974 (15 U.S.C. 2229a(a)(1)(B)) is 

6 amended by inserting ‘‘or to change the status of part7 time or paid-on-call (as defined in section 33(a)) fire8 fighters to full-time firefighters’’ after ‘‘firefighters’’. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1269 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1269

     To require the Office of Pipeline Safety to consult with the 
  Environmental Protection Agency or the Coast Guard in the event the 
   Federal on-scene coordinator has concerns about the ability of a 
        pipeline operator to respond to a worst case discharge.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2017

  Ms. Stabenow (for herself and Mr. Peters) introduced the following 
 bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, 
                      Science, and Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
     To require the Office of Pipeline Safety to consult with the 
  Environmental Protection Agency or the Coast Guard in the event the 
   Federal on-scene coordinator has concerns about the ability of a 
        pipeline operator to respond to a worst case discharge.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Pipeline Safety Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. REQUIREMENT FOR OFFICE OF PIPELINE SAFETY TO CONSULT WITH 
              ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY OR COAST GUARD IN THE 
              EVENT OF CONCERNS ABOUT ABILITY TO RESPOND TO WORST CASE 
              DISCHARGES.

    Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this 
Act, the Secretary of Transportation shall amend section 119(d) of part 
194 of title 49, Code of Federal Regulations (or any similar successor 
regulation) to require that the Office of Pipeline Safety shall consult 
with the Environmental Protection Agency or the Coast Guard in the 
event the Federal on-scene coordinator has concerns about the ability 
of a pipeline operator to respond to a worst case discharge.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2017249EN.01002701.xml

| 31.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 249/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 249/27

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 June 2017 — Bay v Parliament

(Case T-302/16) (1)

((Law governing the Institutions - Decision of the President of the Parliament imposing on a Member of the European Parliament the penalty of forfeiture of entitlement to the subsistence allowance - Article 166 of the Rules of Procedure of the Parliament - Right of access to the file - Error of fact))

(2017/C 249/40)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Nicolas Bay (La Celle-Saint-Cloud, France) (represented by: A. Cuignache, lawyer)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: N. Görlitz, S. Alonso de León and S. Seyr, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking annulment of the decision of the President of the Parliament of 9 March 2016 and of the decision of the Bureau of the Parliament of 11 April 2016 imposing on the applicant the penalty of forfeiture of entitlement to the subsistence allowance for a period of five days.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Nicolas Bay to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Nicolas Bay to pay the costs.

---

(1)  
  OJ C 279, 1.8.2016.

---
1 The Honorable Howard F. Sachs, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri. 

## United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________ No. 06-2505

___________ United States of America, * * Appellee, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the * Western District of Missouri. Shawn M. Ross, * * [UNPUBLISHED] Appellant. *

___________ Submitted: October 24, 2007 Filed: October 29, 2007

___________ Before MURPHY, SMITH, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.

___________ PER CURIAM. Shawn M. Ross appeals the 70-month prison sentence the district court 1 imposed after he pleaded guilty to attempti ng to manufacture at least 35 grams but less than 50 grams of actual methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), (b)(1)(B), and 846. On app eal, Ross’s counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967), arguing that Ross was denied effective assistance of counsel.-2- We adhere to the general rule that Ro ss must raise his claims of ineffective assistance of counsel in a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 proceeding, where the record can be properly developed. SeeUnited States v. Hughes , 330 F.3d 1068, 1069 (8th Cir. 2003). After reviewing the record independently under Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75 (1988), and finding no non-frivolous issues, we affirm the judgment of the district court and grant counsel’s motion to w ithdraw on condition that counsel inform appellant about the procedures for filing petitions for rehearing and for certiorari.

______________________________
No. 68654.

protests 60/12396, etc. (New York).

#### The Durst Mfg. Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

*381Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of rotary lawn sprinklers or metal parts thereof similar in all material respects to those the subject of *The Durst*Mfg. *Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(50 CCPA 56, C.A.D. 820), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Exhibit 99.1

                        CERTIFICATION OF CEO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with the  Annual  Report  on Form  10-KSB of  Sunshine  PCS
Corporation  (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  Karen
E.  Johnson,  as Chief  Executive  Officer  of the  Company,  hereby  certifies,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of her knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



                                /s/ Karen E. Johnson
                                --------------------
                                Name: Karen E. Johnson
                                Title: Chief Executive Officer

Date: March 26, 2003



This   certification   accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT MAY 2, 1998, THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS EACH FOR THE
THIRTEEN WEEKS ENDED MAY 2, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                MAY-2-1998
<CASH>                                              13
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       21
<ALLOWANCES>                                         5
<INVENTORY>                                        202
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   289
<PP&E>                                             174
<DEPRECIATION>                                      60
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     419
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              162
<BONDS>                                            220
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                         (8)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       419
<SALES>                                            163
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   166
<CGS>                                               97
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       97
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    81
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     2
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   7
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (19)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (8)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (11)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (11)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>