alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 2:04-cv-03509-EL Document 1 Filed 07/23/04 Page 1 of 12
Case 2:04-cv-03509-EL Document 1 Filed 07/23/04 Page 2 of 12
Case 2:04-cv-03509-EL Document 1 Filed 07/23/04 Page 3 of 12
Case 2:04-cv-03509-EL Document 1 Filed 07/23/04 Page 4 of 12
Case 2:04-cv-03509-EL Document 1 Filed 07/23/04 Page 5 of 12
Case 2:04-cv-03509-EL Document 1 Filed 07/23/04 Page 6 of 12
Case 2:04-cv-03509-EL Document 1 Filed 07/23/04 Page 7 of 12
Case 2:04-cv-03509-EL Document 1 Filed 07/23/04 Page 8 of 12
Case 2:04-cv-03509-EL Document 1 Filed 07/23/04 Page 9 of 12
Case 2:04-cv-03509-EL Document 1 Filed 07/23/04 Page 10 of 12
Case 2:04-cv-03509-EL Document 1 Filed 07/23/04 Page 11 of 12
Case 2:04-cv-03509-EL Document 1 Filed 07/23/04 Page 12 of 12
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

HAROLD C. WILSON : CIVIL ACTION

Plaintiff, :

 :

v. : 

 :

CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, et al., :

Defendants. : NO. 04-5396

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 31 day of March, 2010, upon consideration of the Motion to Dismiss st

Plaintiff’s Complaint Against Defendants, former District Attorney Lynne Abraham, former

District Attorney Ronald Castille, and former Assistant District Attorney Jack McMahon, and

plaintiff’s opposition thereto, for the reasons explained in the accompanying Memorandum, it is

hereby ORDERED that:

1. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part;

2. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED to the extent that they request

that plaintiff’s claims against former District Attorney Lynne Abraham be DISMISSED for lack

of the required personal involvement under 42 U.S.C. § 1983;

3. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED to the extent that they request

that plaintiff’s claims alleging conduct taken in the moving defendants’ quasi-judicial role, as

opposed to participation in investigatory conduct, be DISMISSED;

4. The Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED to the extent that defendants request

that plaintiff’s claims against Assistant District Attorney Jack McMahon in his official capacity

1
be DISMISSED;

5. Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED to the extent that defendants

request that the state law claims against the moving defendants in their official capacities be

DISMISSED;

6. The Motion to Dismiss is DENIED in all other respects. 

BY THE COURT:

 /s/ L. Felipe Restrepo 

L. FELIPE RESTREPO

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CRIMINAL ACTION

 :

 v. :

 :

HAROLD BRENT KEITH : NO. 04-354

ORDER

AND NOW, this 26th day of January, 2012, upon consideration of Defendant Harold Brent

Keith’s Motion for Reduction of Sentence (Docket No. 60), and the Government’s response thereto, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ John R. Padova 

John R. Padova, J.

Case 2:04-cr-00354-JP Document 64 Filed 01/26/12 Page 1 of 1
Before the Second Division,

December 4, 1961

No. 66247.

#### Dessy Atco, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 58/3224(D), etc. (New York).

*387Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of nylon gloves similar in use to silk gloves and following the principles set forth in *United States*v. *Steinberg Bros.*(47 C.C.P.A. 47 C.A.D. 727), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
(Reap. Dec. 10335)

Entry No. 1846, etc.

#### E. Dillingham, Inc. *v.*United States

(Decided September 13, 1962)

*Barnes, Richardson*<6 *Colburn*for the plaintiff.

*Joseph D. Quilfoyle,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Donlon, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, attached to and made a part of this decision, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED:

> 1. The reappraisement appeals listed on the annexed schedule may be consolidated.

> 2. The merchandise consists of sole leather (other than flexible bend splits and offal) made from hides of cattle of the bovine species exported from Canada, and said merchandise appears on the Secretary’s Pinal List, T.D. 54521.

> 3. At the time of exportation of such merchandise to the United States, the market value or the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale for home consumption to all purchasers in the principal markets of Canada, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other ■costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, was the price shown in Canadian currency in Column 6 of each Special Customs Invoice less a discount of *1%*when exported on or before April 30, 1959, and without any discount when exported after that date; and that there was no higher export value.

> 4. The invoices, entries and all other papers transmitted by the collector may be deemed in evidence; and the case may be submitted upon said papers and this stipulation.

Accepting tlie above stipulation, as an agreed statement of facts, I find and bold that foreign value, as defined in section 402a (c) of tbe Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 (T.D. 54165), is the proper basis for determination of value of the merchandise herein and that such values are the prices in Canadian currency listed in column 6 of each special customs invoice (C.F. 5515), attached to the respective entries herein, less a discount of 1 per centum as to that merchandise exported on or before April 30,1959, and without discount as to that merchandise exported after April 30,1959.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 94

Note 10. Accounts Payable

Accounts Payable as of September 30, 2018, and 2017

(In billions of dollars) 2018 2017

Department of Defense ............................................................................................... 29.2 26.4

Department of Veterans Affairs .................................................................................... 13.5 3.6

Department of Justice ................................................................................................. 5.1 6.0

Department of the Treasury ......................................................................................... 3.8 3.9

Department of Education............................................................................................. 3.8 4.2

Department of Energy ................................................................................................. 3.7 3.7

Department of State.................................................................................................... 3.6 2.7

General Services Administration .................................................................................. 3.1 2.8

Department of Homeland Security................................................................................ 2.5 2.3

U.S. Agency for International Development................................................................... 2.4 1.8

Department of Commerce ........................................................................................... 2.0 0.4

Department of Agriculture............................................................................................ 1.9 1.8

U.S. Postal Service ..................................................................................................... 1.8 1.6

Tennessee Valley Authority ......................................................................................... 1.8 1.8

All other...................................................................................................................... 8.5 7.8

Total accounts payable............................................................................................. 86.7 70.8

 Accounts payable includes amounts due for goods and property ordered and received, services rendered by other than 

federal employees, cancelled appropriations for which the U.S. government has contractual commitments for payment, and 

non-debt related interest payable.
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE
F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Wydell Lorraine Dixon v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 13

- 00408

- CR ; 01

- 13

- 00409

- CR; 01

- 13

- 00410

- CR;

01

- 13

- 00411

- CR

Trial court case number: 12CR0748 ; 12CR0749; 12CR0750; 12CR0751

Trial court: 56th District Court of Galveston County

This case was abated and remanded to the trial court for the trial court to determine whether appellant wishes to prosecute this appeal, to determine whether appellant’s counsel had abandoned the appeal, and, if counsel had not abandoned the appeal, to inquire of counsel why appellant’s brief has not yet been filed, to determine

w hether counsel’s fee has been paid, and to set a date certain when appellant’s counsel must file appellant’s brief. The trial court held a hearing on our abatement order on March 6, 2014, and the trial court clerk and court reporter have filed their respe ctive records of the hearing. The record reflects t hat the trial court made all necessary findings and then ordered counsel to file a brief on appellant’s behalf by March 27, 2014. Accordingly, we REINSTATE this case on the Court’s active docket.

Appella nt’s brief is ORDERED to be filed by no later than March 27, 2014. See

T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 38.6(a) , (d) . No extensions of time to file appellant’s brief will be granted.

Appellee’s brief, if any, is ORDERED to be filed within 30 days of the filing of appella nt’s brief. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 38.6(b).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Chief Justice Sherry Radack

 Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: March 11, 2014
# United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit

No. 19-1754
JEFFREY BOUDREAU, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Wendy Boudreau,
Plaintiff, Appellant,

v.
SHAW'S SUPERMARKETS, INC.,
Defendant, Appellee.

**ERRATA SHEET**
The opinion of this Court, issued on April 10, 2020, is amended as follows:

On page 18, line 13, replace "173.!" with "173."
CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Brian Bass, Chief Executive Officer of San Telmo Energy Ltd., (the Company) do hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



1. This Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company for the period ended April 30, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the report), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: October 31, 2005



Signed: /s/  Brian Bass



Brian Bass,

Chief Executive Officer













#
Before the Second Division,

May 6, 1959

No. 63017.

#### Plus Computing Machines, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 58/851 (A), etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” consist of key-driven calculating machines and parts thereof the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Plus Computing Machines, Inc.*v. *United States*(44 C.C.P.A. 160, C.A.D. 655), the claim at 11% percent under the provision in paragraph 372, as modified by T.D. 54108, for calculating machines specially constructed for multiplying and dividing and parts thereof was sustained as to said items. The items marked “B,” stipulated to be the same in all material respects as the merchandise the subject of C.A.D. 655, *supra,*except for having, in addition, an electric motor as an essential feature, were held dutiable at 11% percent under the provision in paragraph 353, as modified by T.D. 54108, for calculating machines specially constructed for multiplying and dividing, having an electric motor as an essential feature and parts thereof.
Exhibit 31.2
**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**
I, Francis Raborn, certify that:
1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of United Defense Industries, Inc.;
2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;
3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.   The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:
a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b)   designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal controlover financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assuranceregarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements forexternal purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; and
c)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presentedin this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d)   disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
5.   The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and theaudit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):
a)   all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrols over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: April 28, 2005 /s/ Francis Raborn   Title: Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 217 (Monday, November 13, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 77615]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-24817]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET


Issuance of Revised OMB Circular No. A-94, ``Guidelines and 
Discount Rates for Benefit-Cost Analysis of Federal Programs''

AGENCY: Office of Management and Budget.

ACTION: Notice of availability.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) is announcing the 
issuance of the revised Circular A-94, ``Guidelines and Discount Rates 
for Benefit-Cost Analysis of Federal Programs.''

ADDRESSES: Circular A-94, ``Regulatory Analysis,'' is available at 
https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/CircularA-94.pdf.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jamie Taber, Office of Economic 
Policy, Office of Management and Budget, (202) 395-2515, 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d3b2eae793bcbeb1fdb6bca3fdb4bca5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="43227a77032c2e216d262c336d242c35">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: OMB announces the issuance of the revised 
Circular A-94, Regulatory Analysis. OMB Circular No. A-94 provides 
guidance on benefit-cost analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis of 
Federal spending. The new Circular is available at https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/CircularA-94.pdf.
    This Circular replaces and rescinds Office of Management and Budget 
(OMB) Circular No. A-94, ``Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit 
Cost Analysis of Federal Programs,'' dated October 29, 1992.
    A draft of this Circular was subject to public comment and 
interagency review.

Wesley Yin,
Associate Director for Economic Policy, Office of Management and 
Budget.
[FR Doc. 2023-24817 Filed 11-9-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3110-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2019305EN.01003601.xml

| 9.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 305/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 305/36

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 July 2019 — Hitachi-LG Data Storage and Hitachi-LG Data Storage Korea v Commission

(Case T-1/16) (1)

(Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Market for optical disk drives - Decision finding an infringement of Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement - Collusive agreements relating to procurement events organised by two computer manufacturers - Unlimited jurisdiction - Infringement of the principle of good administration - Obligation to state reasons - Point 37 of the 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines - Particular circumstances - Error of law)

(2019/C 305/42)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Hitachi-LG Data Storage, Inc. (Tokyo, Japan) and Hitachi-LG Data Storage Korea, Inc. (Seoul, South Korea) (represented by: L. Gyselen and N. Ersbøll, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by: A. Biolan, M. Farley, C. Giolito and F. van Schaik, and subsequently by A. Biolan, M. Farley and F. van Schaik, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action under Article 263 TFEU seeking a reduction of the amount of the fine imposed by the European Commission on the applicants in its Decision C(2015) 7135 final of 21 October 2015 relating to a proceeding under Article 101 TFEU and Article 53 of the EEA Agreement (Case AT.39639 — Optical Disk Drives).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Hitachi-LG Data Storage, Inc. and Hitachi-LG Data Storage Korea, Inc. to bear their own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Hitachi-LG Data Storage, Inc. and Hitachi-LG Data Storage Korea, Inc. to bear their own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 98, 14.3.2016.

---
**EXHIBIT32.2**

 

**CertificationPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofAXT, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Wilson W. Cheung, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), that,to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1) The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: August  9, 2005 | By:    | /s/ Wilson W. Cheung    |
|-----------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                        |   | Wilson W. Cheung        |
|                        |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of J.Crew Group, Inc. and (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended May 5, 2007
(the Report), we, Millard S. Drexler, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and James S. Scully, Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of each of our knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: June 13, 2007



|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Millard S. Drexler                                              
|Millard S. Drexler Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer



|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ James S. Scully                                                 
|James S. Scully Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document

EXHIBIT 10.19
Amendment No. 8 to the
Pfizer Supplemental Savings Plan (the “PSSP”)
(Amended and Restated as of January 1, 2016)
*     *     *


(New material underlined; deletions crossed out)


1.New Appendix I is added to read as follows:
APPENDIX I
SPECIAL PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO EMPLOYEES TRANSFERRED TO EMPLOYMENT WITH VIATRIS INC.


Effective as of the Distribution Date (“Closing Date”) as defined in that certain Separation and Distribution Agreement by and between Pfizer Inc. and Upjohn Inc., dated as of July 29, 2019 (the “SDA”), this Appendix I sets out the additional provisions that apply to those certain employees of the Company (the “Transferred Viatris Employees”) whose employment is transferred to Viatris Inc. pursuant to the terms of the SDA:


1.As of the Closing Date, Transferred Viatris Employees are no longer eligible to participate in the Plan. 


2.For purposes of any Matching Contribution paid with respect to the 2020 plan year, the Closing Date for each such Transferred Viatris Employee shall be considered to have occurred on the last day of the applicable quarter of 2020.


3.For purposes of the Retirement Savings Contribution paid with respect to the 2020 plan year, the Closing Date for each such Transferred Viatris Employee shall be considered to have occurred on the last day of 2020. 


4.Effective as of the Closing Date, any unvested Retirement Savings Contributions in the Accounts of Transferred Viatris Employees shall be vested.