alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1238 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase and make permanent the exclusion for benefits provided to volunteer firefighters and 

emergency medical responders. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 25, 2017 

Ms. COLLINS (for herself, Mr. CARDIN, Mr. SCHUMER, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, 

Ms. KLOBUCHAR, Mr. ROUNDS, and Mr. MERKLEY) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase 

and make permanent the exclusion for benefits provided 

to volunteer firefighters and emergency medical responders. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Volunteer Responder 

5 Incentive Protection Act of 2017’’. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1238 IS

1 SEC. 2. BENEFITS PROVIDED TO VOLUNTEER FIRE2 FIGHTERS AND EMERGENCY MEDICAL RE3 SPONDERS. 

4 (a) INCREASE IN DOLLAR LIMITATION ON QUALI5 FIED PAYMENTS.—Subparagraph (B) of section 

6 139B(c)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is 

7 amended by striking ‘‘$30’’ and inserting ‘‘$50’’. 

8 (b) REIMPLEMENTING AND MAKING PERMANENT

9 BENEFITS.—Section 139B of the Internal Revenue Code 

10 of 1986 is amended by striking subsection (d). 

11 (c) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

12 this section shall apply to taxable years beginning after 

13 December 31, 2017. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
# C_2017256EN.01002801.xml

| 7.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 256/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 256/28

---

Order of the General Court of 1 June 2017 — Camerin v Parliament

(Case T-647/16) (1)

1

((Civil service - Officials - Secondment in the interests of the service - Retirement age - Request for an extension of the secondment - Rejection of the request - Measure not open to challenge - Preparatory act - Inadmissibility))

(2017/C 256/33)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Laure Camerin (Etterbeek, Belgium) (represented by: M. Casado García-Hirschfeld, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: S. Alves and M. Ecker, Agents)

Defendant:

Subject matter

Subject matter

Application based on Article 270 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision of the Secretary General of the Group of the Progressive Alliance of Socialists and Democrats in the Parliament of 1 December 2015 rejecting the request for an extension of the applicant’s secondment beyond 31 December 2015 and seeking annulment of the decision of the President of the Group of 15 June 2016 rejecting her appeal against that earlier decision.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | Ms Laure Camerin shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Ms Laure Camerin shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 410, 7.11.2016.

1

---
# ORIGINAL IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTA PR 24-0006

IN RE MOTION FOR ADMISSION UPON UNIFORM BAR EXAMINATION SCORE TRANSFER 

### JUN 11 2024 Bowen Greenwood Clerk of Supreme Court State of Montana ORDER

Lauren M. Ayoub has filed a petition for admission to the State Bar of Montana pursuant to Rule IV of the Rules for Admission to the Bar of the State of Montana, governing admission upon Uniform Bar Examination score transfer. The Bar Admissions Administrator ofthe StateBar ofMontanahas informed the Courtthat the Commission on Character and Fitness has certified that Ayoub has provided the necessary documentation andhas satisfied the requirementsprerequisiteto admissionunder RuleIV ofthe Rules for Admission to the State Bar ofMontana. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that upon payment of any application fees and competition of any other processing requirements as set forth by the Bar Adrnissions Administrator, Lauren M. Ayoub may be sworn in to the practice of law in the State of Montana. The Clerk is directed to provide copies ofthis order to the Petitioner and the State Bar ofMontana. DATED this t day ofJune, 2024.

ChiefJustice



# ("t6-faytt,,, 06/11/2024

Case Number: PR 24-0006

# 747-0-4-k-
# C_2019155EN.01003801.xml

| 6.5.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.5.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/38

---

Judgment of the General Court of 20 March 2019 — Foshan Lihua Ceramic v Commission

(Case T-310/16) (1)

(Dumping - Imports of ceramic tiles originating in China - Article 11(4) and (5) and Article 17 of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 (now Article 11(4) and (5) and Article 17 of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036) - Refusal to grant new exporting producer treatment in accordance with Article 3 of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 917/2011 - Sampling - Individual examination - Confidentiality)

(2019/C 155/45)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Foshan Lihua Ceramic Co. Ltd (Foshan, China) (represented by: B. Spinoit, D. Philippe and A. Wese, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by: A. Demeneix, M. França and T. Maxian Rusche, and subsequently by A. Demeneix, T. Maxian Rusche and N. Kuplewatzky, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Cerame-Unie AISBL (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: V. Akritidis, lawyer)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU, for the annulment of the Commission’s Implementing Decision C(2016) 2136 final of 15 April 2016 rejecting a request for a new exporting producer treatment with regard to the definitive anti-dumping measures imposed on imports of ceramic tiles originating in the People’s Republic of China by Implementing Regulation (EU) No 917/2011.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Foshan Lihua Ceramic Co. Ltd to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Foshan Lihua Ceramic Co. Ltd to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;

| 3. | Orders Cerame-Unie AISBL to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Cerame-Unie AISBL to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 305, 22.8.2016.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The undersigned hereby certifies, in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer of Salem Communications Corporation (the Company), for purposes of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on his knowledge: · the Quarterly Report of the Company on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  · the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Dated: August 9, 2010By: /s/ EDWARD G. ATSINGER IIIEdward G. Atsinger IIIPresident and Chief Executive Officer
FILED IN 12th COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS 7/27/2015 9:48:30 AM CATHY S. LUSK Clerk
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1336 

To amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to reauthorize hydroelectric production incentives and hydroelectric efficiency improvement incentives, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 12, 2017 

Mr. GARDNER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to reauthorize 

hydroelectric production incentives and hydroelectric efficiency improvement incentives, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Reliable Investment 

5 in Vital Energy Reauthorization Act’’ or the ‘‘RIVER 

6 Act’’. 


rfrederick on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1336 IS

1 SEC. 2. HYDROELECTRIC PRODUCTION INCENTIVES AND 

2 EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENTS. 

3 (a) HYDROELECTRIC PRODUCTION INCENTIVES.— 

4 Section 242 of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 

5 15881) is amended— 

6 (1) in subsection (c), by striking ‘‘10’’ and in7 serting ‘‘20’’; 

8 (2) in subsection (f), by striking ‘‘20’’ and in9 serting ‘‘30’’; and 

10 (3) in subsection (g), by striking ‘‘each of the 

11 fiscal years 2006 through 2015’’ and inserting ‘‘each 

12 of fiscal years 2018 through 2027’’. 

13 (b) HYDROELECTRIC EFFICIENCY IMPROVEMENT.— 

14 Section 243(c) of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 

15 U.S.C. 15882(c)) is amended by striking ‘‘each of the fis16 cal years 2006 through 2015’’ and inserting ‘‘each of fis17 cal years 2018 through 2027’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 31.2**
**Certification of Chief Financial Officer**
I, Francis Raborn, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of United DefenseIndustries, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and
c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal controls over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process,summarize and report financial information; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.
Date: November 4, 2004   /s/ Francis Raborn   Title:            Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 31.2**I, Brian T. Marley, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Belk, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or causedsuch internal control over financial reporting to be designed under oursupervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability offinancial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: December 13, 2007 /s/ Brian T. Marley
Case 2:04-cv-05780-LKC Document 44 Filed 04/06/09 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:04-cv-05780-LKC Document 44 Filed 04/06/09 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:04-cv-05780-LKC Document 44 Filed 04/06/09 Page 3 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MCNEIL, :

Petitioner, : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. : No. 04-CV-5125

:

COMMONWEALTH OF PA, et al., :

Defendants. :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 16th day of August, 2005 upon consideration of the Report and

Recommendation filed by United States Magistrate Judge Timothy R. Rice, to which no Objections

have been filed, and upon careful and independent review of the petition for writ of habeas corpus,

it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.

2. The petition for a writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED without prejudice.

3. There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability.

4. The Clerk of Court shall mark this case closed for statistical purposes. 

BY THE COURT:

s/

CLIFFORD SCOTT GREEN, S.J.

Case 2:04-cv-05125-CG Document 12 Filed 08/16/05 Page 1 of 1
119 NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 15. Benefits Due and Payable

Benefits Due and Payable as of September 30, 2020, and 2019

(In billions of dollars) 2020 2019

Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance.................................................. 83.7 79.8

Grants to States for Medicaid.................................................................... 45.8 37.1

Federal Supplementary Medical Insurance (Medicare Parts B and D).......... 39.4 37.1

Federal Hospital Insurance (Medicare Part A)............................................ 30.8 34.4

Federal Disability Insurance...................................................................... 21.4 22.4

Unemployment Insurance ........................................................................ 16.5 0.9

All other benefits programs ....................................................................... 18.7 11.9

Total benefits due and payable............................................................... 256.3 223.6

Benefits due and payable are amounts owed to program recipients or medical service providers as of September 30 that

have not been paid. Most of the benefits due and payable relate to programs administered by HHS and SSA. For a description

of the programs, see Note 23—Social Insurance and the unaudited RSI—Social Insurance section.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Integrated
Healthcare Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2006,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company at the dates and for the period indicated.

     This Certificate has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.


Dated: August 10, 2006                      By:  /s/ Steven R. Blake
                                                -------------------
                                                Steven R. Blake
                                                Chief Financial Officer


                                       39
No. 66737.

#### Sprouse Reitz Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 58/25757 (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of microscopes, valued under $25 each, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 57647.

#### S. Stern, Henry & Co. *v.*United States,

protest 206892-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

An examination of the official record before the court disclosing no reason for disturbing the presumptively correct classification of the collector, the protest was overruled.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

December 21, 2009 

y1214 

Order 

 

December 21, 2009 

139213(37) 

 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 139213 

 COA: 283164 

Wayne CC: 07-010558-FC 

LEONDRE LAVON WALKER, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s September 

28, 2009 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order 

was entered erroneously.
# I Re: Pio Pico Application Tonnie Cummings

Cleveland Holladay

03/22/2012 09:14 AM Susan_Johnson, Don Shepherd, John Notar, Judy_Rocchio, Benjamin_Pister_______ This message has been forwarded. Hi Cleve— It’s nice to have the opportunity

to work with you again, and I’m glad to hear you’re enjoying life or. the “left” coast and with EPA. Sorry it took me a ctup.e of weeks rc get back to you. Thanks for the opportunity

rc review the Pic P1cc Energy lenten (PPEC) PS permit application. Accorrlinç
no the application,

the facIlity woula be locatec ir, San Dieac Ocurity, approximately

33 km SE cf Cabrillo NatIonal Worumen:. NM)

. PPEC woud be a 30 MW peakna unit—limited

to 4,
0 hrs’yr of opera:ion—consistirc

of three GE hSlDC sirule—cycle, natural—gas fired turbines. P:oposed emissions and controls are as follows: 70 tons per year (TPY) of NCX, cor.trc’lled

to 2.5 ppm with water injection and 5CR 37 T?Y of PW/PMC, controlled
by using natural gas as fuel & TPY of CC, controlled

to
4 ppmvd with oxidation catalyst 685,001 TPY of Greenhouse Gases, controlled
by use of natural gas as fuel and efficient silTPe—cyce

turbines Because the facility would be located
in an ozone non-attainment area, NOx emissions would be offset at the ration of 1.2:2.. We appreciate that the applicant evaluated mpacts not only at the I’SFS Class



## : air quality areas located within 101 km of toe proposed facility, but also at F Class areas located withir. 50 km. The VISCREEN modeling analysis indicates the facility would not exceed visibility

thresholds

at Cabrillo NM. Therefore,

we agree that the facility,

as proposed, will not significantly affect air quality
at Cabrillo NM. Thanks, again, for the opportunity

to corrient on the applicatiorL.

Feel free to contact me if you have any questions. - -Tonnie Tonr.ie Cummings Air Resources $pe:lalis: National Parc Service, Pacific West Recion E.2 S. Reserve Street ‘7ancouver,
WA 986&. Poone: 36—3é-2Di ax: 3é—9.6—5365 Eman: Thr.nie Cummings@nps.gorCleveland Hoiladay cHolladay.Clevela

To nd@eparnail.epa.cc tonnie cumminqs@nps

. gov

DC :3/c7/l1C D5;C5

Subect Plc Picc Application Tcnr.ie, : have finally found

a ay tc act largeles

Co you. You can go to gocgle.dos and log ntc

fi

Password
is 1 The Pic ?ico acaticr

is there for yi to download. et me ow if you have any problems. Thanks, —Cieve Cleve Hoilad.ay Phone 4a5—94—4i4Q U.S. EPA, Region

, Air Quality Analysis Office AIR—7)
75 Hawthorr.e St., San Francisco,

CA 4l35
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CIVIL ACTION NO. 10-480

 :

 v. :

 :

ANTHONY GAGLIARDI : CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 04-796

ORDER

AND NOW, this 1st day of June, 2010, upon consideration of Defendant Anthony

Gagliardi’s pro se Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255

(Crim. Docket No. 225) and all response thereto, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

1. Defendant’s Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 2255 is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 

3. As Defendant has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right, there is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability.

4. The Clerk is directed to CLOSE Civil Action No. 10-480.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ John R. Padova 

 

John R. Padova, J.