alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SERVICE
P.O. BOX 603
PHILADELPHIA, PA 19020-0603

To Agencies Serviced by the Management Letter 11-02
Philadelphia Financial Center (PFC) July 22, 2011

The Department of the Treasury, Financial Management Service (FMS), values the importance of
privacy and the protection of personal identifiable information (PII). To that end, the suppression of
Social Security Numbers (SSN) and Taxpayer Identification Numbers (TIN) in federal government
Automated Clearing House (ACH) payments was begun in late 2010. As we phased in additional
payments and increased the diversity of payment types in which the SSN/TIN was being suppressed,
a number of issues have surfaced. One of the root problems is linked to third party or subsidiary
account relationships. In these cases, the SSN/TIN provides the information that facilitates payments
being posted or applied to a specific payee. Absent that information, the process breaks down and it
becomes difficult if not impossible to apply the funds to the appropriate recipient.

The problem/issue has become prevalent enough that the decision has been made to suspend
SSN/TIN suppression of Treasury disbursed ACH payments. This means that SSN/TIN numbers
will once again be included in the ACH payment record as done previously, and this change should
eliminate the problem/issue that payment recipients have recently experienced. The effective date of
this change will be for payments dated on or after July 22, 2011.

Please note that this decision is expected to be a “temporary” solution. We (Treasury) will be
working with the National Automated Clearing House Association (NACHA) and federal program
agencies to identify and develop an appropriate approach to protect PII data throughout the entire
ACH payment delivery cycle. We are confident that this multiple party effort will help to create an
industry-wide solution to address this important issue.

Please contact Lisa Andre, Customer Service Branch Manager, if you have additional questions, she

can be reached at 215-516-8142 or Lisa.Andre@fims.treas.gov.

Sincerely,

N.S 4 / Vi f
Poe Ute fer
Elizabeth A. Belinsky

Regional Director
# C_2017249EN.01000901.xml

| 31.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 249/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 249/9

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 31 May 2017 — Dimosia Epicheirisi Ilektrismou AE (DEI) v European Commission

(Case C-228/16 P) (1)

((Appeal - State aid - Decision to take no further action - Refusal by the European Commission to continue to examine the applicant’s complaint - Lack of aid at the end of the preliminary examination stage - Purely confirmatory decision - Legal conditions for the withdrawal of a decision to take no further action))

(2017/C 249/12)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Appellant: Dimosia Epicheirisi Ilektrismou AE (DEI) (represented by: E. Bourtzalas, avocat, A. Oikonomou, E. Salaka, C. Synodinos and C. Tagaras, dikigoroi, and by D. Waelbroeck, avocat,)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: A. Bouchagiar and É. Gippini Fournier, acting as Agents)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets aside the order of the General Court of the European Union of 9 February 2016, DEI v Commission (T-639/14, not published, EU:T:2016:77); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets aside the order of the General Court of the European Union of 9 February 2016, DEI v Commission (T-639/14, not published, EU:T:2016:77);

| 2. | Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union;

| 3. | Reserves the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Reserves the costs.

---

(1)  
  OJ C 211, 13.6.2016.

---
# C_2016251EN.01000401.xml

| 11.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 251/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 251/4

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de la Comunidad Autónoma del País Vasco (Spain) lodged on 7 April 2016 — E v Subdelegación del Gobierno en Álava

(Case C-193/16)

(2016/C 251/05)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal Superior de Justicia de la Comunidad Autónoma del País Vasco

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant/appellant: E

Applicant/appellant:

Defendant/respondent: Subdelegación del Gobierno en Álava

Defendant/respondent:

Question referred

Question referred

In accordance with Article 27 [(1) and (2)] of Directive 2004/38/EC, (1) does the appellant, sentenced to 12 years’ imprisonment for repeated offences of child abuse, represent a genuine and present threat to public security, bearing in mind that he is detained in prison and, having served six years, has several years left to serve before being released?

1

---

(1)  Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States amending Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 and repealing Directives 64/221/EEC, 68/360/EEC, 72/194/EEC, 73/148/EEC, 75/34/EEC, 75/35/EEC, 90/364/EEC, 90/365/EEC and 93/96/EEC (OJ 2004 L 158, p. 77).

1

---
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**Certification Pursuant to**

**18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

**As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of AXT, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Qfor the quarter ended June 30, 2010, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Raymond A. Low,Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 906”),that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

 

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| Dated:  August 9, 2010 | By:    | /s/ RAYMOND A. LOW                                                                                        |
|-----------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                        |   | Raymond A. Low *Chief Financial Officer**(Principal Financial Officer and**Principal Accounting Officer)* |

 

----
EXHIBIT 99.1

THE FOLLOWING CERTIFICATION IS PROVIDED BY THE UNDERSIGNED CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER OF MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC. ON THE BASIS OF SUCH OFFICER'S KNOWLEDGE
AND BELIEF FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF COMPLYING WITH 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002.

                                  CERTIFICATION
                                  -------------

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Midwest Banc Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on August 14, 2002 (the "Report"), I, Brad A.
Luecke, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
                  amended; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


                                    ___/s/Brad A. Luecke__________
                                    Name:  Brad A. Luecke
                                    Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
                                    Date:  August 14, 2002
(Reap. Dec. 10320)

Entry No. 724071, etc.

#### Plywood & Door Manufacturers Corporation *v.*United States

(Decided August 29, 1962)

*Richard Van Steenburgh*for the plaintiff.

*Joseph D. Guilfoyle,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

The merchandise the subject of the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in schedule “A,” attached hereto, consists of birch plywood, exported from Finland in the years 1954 and 1955.

Counsel for the parties have stipulated and agreed that the merchandise and issues involved in the said appeals are the same in all material respects as those in the case of *United States*v. *Plywood &*
      *371
      *Door Manufacturers Corporation,*46 Cust. Ct. 797, A.R.D. 133; and that the record in the cited case may be incorporated as part of the record herein.

The appeals have been submitted for decision upon written stipulation, on the basis of which I find that export value, as defined in section 402(d), Tariff Act of 1930, is the proper basis for the determination of the values of the birch plywood involved and that such values were those set forth in column “4” of said schedule “A,” packed, less the prorated amounts of the nondutiable charges set forth directly after the description of the merchandise in each said reappraisement case set forth in schedule “A.”

Judgment will issue accordingly.
Case 2:04-cv-03282-JF Document 141 Filed 09/11/06 Page 1 of 6
Case 2:04-cv-03282-JF Document 141 Filed 09/11/06 Page 2 of 6
Case 2:04-cv-03282-JF Document 141 Filed 09/11/06 Page 3 of 6
Case 2:04-cv-03282-JF Document 141 Filed 09/11/06 Page 4 of 6
Case 2:04-cv-03282-JF Document 141 Filed 09/11/06 Page 5 of 6
Case 2:04-cv-03282-JF Document 141 Filed 09/11/06 Page 6 of 6
EXHIBIT 32
                                                                      ----------

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Extended Systems Incorporated on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report"), I, Charles W. Jepson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Extended
     Systems Incorporated.


/s/ CHARLES W. JEPSON
----------------------------------------
Charles W. Jepson
Chief Executive Officer
May 16, 2005
<PAGE>


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Extended Systems Incorporated on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended
March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report"), I, Valerie A. Heusinkveld, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Extended
     Systems Incorporated.


/s/ VALERIE A. HEUSINKVELD
----------------------------------------
Valerie A. Heusinkveld
Chief Financial Officer
May 16, 2005
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1186 

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to designate certain entities 

as centers of excellence for domestic maritime workforce training and 

education, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 18, 2017 

Ms. BALDWIN (for herself, Mr. CORNYN, Mr. KAINE, Mr. RUBIO, and Mr. 

KENNEDY) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To authorize the Secretary of Transportation to designate 

certain entities as centers of excellence for domestic maritime workforce training and education, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Domestic Maritime 

5 Centers of Excellence Act of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. DOMESTIC MARITIME CENTERS OF EXCELLENCE. 

7 (a) DESIGNATION AUTHORITY.—The Secretary of 

8 Transportation is authorized to designate community and 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1186 IS

1 technical colleges with a maritime training program and 

2 maritime training centers operated by or under the super3 vision of a State, if located in the United States along 

4 the Gulf of Mexico, Atlantic Ocean, Pacific Ocean, Arctic 

5 Ocean, Bering Sea, Gulf of Alaska, or Great Lakes, as 

6 centers of excellence for domestic maritime workforce 

7 training and education. 

8 (b) ASSISTANCE.— 

9 (1) TYPES.—The Secretary may provide to an 

10 entity designated as a center of excellence under 

11 subsection (a)— 

12 (A) technical assistance; and 

13 (B) surplus Federal equipment and assets. 

14 (2) TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE.—The Secretary 

15 may provide technical assistance under paragraph 

16 (1) to assist an entity designated as a center of ex17 cellence under subsection (a) to expand the capacity 

18 of the entity to train the domestic maritime work19 force of the United States, including by— 

20 (A) admitting additional students; 

21 (B) recruiting and training faculty; 

22 (C) expanding facilities; 

23 (D) creating new maritime career path24 ways; and 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1186 IS

1 (E) awarding students credit for prior ex2 perience, including military service. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
# C_2017014EN.01001902.xml

| 16.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 14/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 14/19

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte dei Conti (Italy) lodged on 12 October 2016 — Istituto Nazionale della Previdenza Sociale v Francesco Faggiano

(Case C-524/16)

(2017/C 014/25)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Corte dei Conti

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Istituto Nazionale della Previdenza Sociale

Defendant: Francesco Faggiano

Questions referred

| 1. | Must the rules of EU law laid down in Regulation (EEC) No 1408/1971 of the Council of 14 June 1971 (1) and Council Regulation (EC) No 1606/1998 of 29 June 1998 (2) be interpreted to the effect that a request for aggregation of social security contributions made to several pension funds, in particular in the home Member State and in another Member State of the European Union, may not be made by a person already in receipt of a pension? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Must the rules of EU law laid down in Regulation (EEC) No 1408/1971 of the Council of 14 June 1971 (1) and Council Regulation (EC) No 1606/1998 of 29 June 1998 (2) be interpreted to the effect that a request for aggregation of social security contributions made to several pension funds, in particular in the home Member State and in another Member State of the European Union, may not be made by a person already in receipt of a pension?

| 2. | Does Article 49(1)(b)(ii) of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/1971 of the Council of 14 June 1971 preclude a national rule such as the Italian rule laid down in Article 71 of Law No 388 of 23 December 2000, according to which a request for aggregation of social security contributions made to several pension funds, in particular in the home Member State and in another Member State of the European Union, is confined to those who have not yet acquired the right to a pension from any social security fund? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Does Article 49(1)(b)(ii) of Regulation (EEC) No 1408/1971 of the Council of 14 June 1971 preclude a national rule such as the Italian rule laid down in Article 71 of Law No 388 of 23 December 2000, according to which a request for aggregation of social security contributions made to several pension funds, in particular in the home Member State and in another Member State of the European Union, is confined to those who have not yet acquired the right to a pension from any social security fund?

---

(1)  Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 of the Council of 14 June 1971 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons and their families moving within the Community (OJ 1971 L 149, p. 2).

(2)  Council Regulation (EC) No 1606/98 of 29 June 1998 amending Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 on the application of social security schemes to employed persons, to self-employed persons and to members of their families moving within the Community and Regulation (EEC) No 574/72 laying down the procedure for implementing Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 with a view to extending them to cover special schemes for civil servants (OJ 1998 L 209, p. 1).

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
SEPTEMBER 30, 1999 NINE MONTH ENDED FINANCIAL STATEMENT AND IS QUALIFIED IN
ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH 10-Q
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          78,022
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  868,051
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,245,973
<PP&E>                                       2,985,229
<DEPRECIATION>                                  89,265
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,216,797
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          148,761
<BONDS>                                        517,739
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        552
<COMMON>                                        28,945
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,269,887
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,216,797
<SALES>                                      4,932,984
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             4,932,984
<CGS>                                        3,912,018
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,912,018
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                565,699
<INCOME-TAX>                                   186,681
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   379,018
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .03
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .03


</TABLE>
COALITION PROVISIONAL AUTHORITY ORDER NUMBER 70
AMENDMENTS TO RECONSTRUCTION LEVY

Pursuant to my authority as Administrator of the Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA)
and under the laws and usages of war, and consistent with relevant U.N. Security Council
resolutions, including Resolutions 1483 and 1511 (2003),

Recognizing that the effective administration of Iraq requires funding for improvements
to its infrastructure and capital public investment,

Noting that the reconstruction levy was imposed under CPA Order Number 38,

Noting that the effective date for imposition of the reconstruction levy was delayed until
March 1, 2004, pursuant to CPA Order Number 47,

Noting further that the effective date for imposition of the reconstruction levy was again
delayed until April 1, 2004, pursuant to CPA Order Number 54, Section 7,

Determined that the collection of said levy be undertaken efficiently and effectively
without disrupting trade relations or impeding reconstruction efforts or import flow,

I hereby promulgate the following:

Section 1
Amendments

1) Coalition Provisional Authority Order Number 38 (CPA/ORD/19 September
2003/38), Reconstruction Levy, Section 1, Article 4, is amended to read in its entirety
as follows: z

“4) Unless exempted under this Order, the Reconstruction Levy shall be imposed on
all goods imported into Iraq from all countries beginning April 15, 2004.”

2) Coalition Provisional Authority Order Number 54 (CPA/ORD/24 February 2004/54),
Trade Liberalization Policy 2004, is hereby amended by deleting Section 7 in its
entirety and redesignating existing Section 8 as Section 7.

Section 2
Rescission

CPA Order Number 47 (CPA/ORD/31 December 2003/47), Amendment to Coalition
Provisional Authority Order Number 38, is hereby rescinded.

CPA/ORD/3 April 2004/70


Section 3
Entry into Force

This Order shall enter into force on the date of signature.

[oe 44

L. Paul Bremer, Administrator
Coalition Provisional Authority

CPA/ORD/3 April 2004/70
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-40177 Conference Calendar

__________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus JUAN ALONSO-MARTINEZ, Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. L-94-CR-209-1

- - - - - - - - - - (October 19, 1995) Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and REAVLEY and SMITH, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Court-appointed counsel for Juan Alonso-Martinez has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 744, (1967), and we have independently reviewed the brief and record, and found no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.