alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
 

Nos. 6-4230, 6-4305, 6-4442 

~.\/

Lexington Ins Co 

vs. 

Kidspeace Corp 

Lexington Ins Co, Appellant in 06-423~&:'" '.. 

PA Prop Cslty Ins, Appellant in 06-43~~-----~

Kidspeace Corp, Appellant in 06-4442 

(Eastern District of Pennsylvania Civil No. 05-cv-00652) 

o R D E R 

In accordance with the agreement of the parties in the above 

entitled case, it is entered dismissed by the Clerk under the 

authority conferred upon her by Rule 42(b), Federal Rules 

of Appellate Procedure without cost to either party. 

ATrue Copy:	 lsi Marcia M. Waldron 

Clerk 

United States Court of Appeals ,.', r for the Third Circuit 

MalCla M. WalOlon,
 

Clerk
 

Date: January 1'/, 2007 

cc: 

Charles W. Craven, Esq. 

Susan E. Wild, Esq. 

Errol C. Deans Jr., Esq. 

Lise Luborsky, Esq. 

Case 2:05-cv-00652-WD Document 39 Filed 01/17/07 Page 1 of 2
OFFICE OF THE CLERK 

MARCIA M. WALDRON UNITED STATES COURT OF ApPEALS TELEPHONE 

CLERK FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT 215-597-2995 

21400 UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE 

601 MARKET STREET 

PHILADELPHIA, PA 19106-1790 

Eastern PA Clerk ofDistrict Court Date 01/17/07 

(District) 

Lexinl:ton Ins Co v. Kidspeace Corp C. ofA. No. 06-4230/4305/4442 

(Caption) 

Lexington Ins Co, Aplt in 06-4230 

PA Prop Cslty Ins, Aplt in 06-4305 

Kidspeace Corp. Aplt in 06-4442 

(Appellant) 

Civil No. 05-cv-00652 (JWD) 

(D.C. No.) 

Enclosures: 

___--:0~1~/1"'-'7'-'-/0"'-7'______ Certified copy of C. of A. Order by the Clerk/XXXXX 

(Date) 

____Released (Record) (Supplemental Record - First - Second - Third) 

____ Copy ofthis form to acknowledge receipt and return to C. ofA. 

____Record not released at this time until appeal(s) closed at No.(s). _ 

____ Please forward Certified List in lieu of Record to this office. 

____ The certified copy of order issued as the mandate on is recalled. 

---,-,/s",--/"",--A"""n,-,,,th~o~n-.r-y~In~f;!o..!:!:a~nt~e (267)-299- 4916 

Case Manager Telephone Number 

Receipt Acknowledge: 

(Name) 

(Date) 

Rev. 4/3/03 

Appeals (Certified List in Lieu ofRecord) 

Case 2:05-cv-00652-WD Document 39 Filed 01/17/07 Page 2 of 2
'^tiX

v:^

LH^^

CjoU£T Of- CLRlm/aJaL 4P/><e^?jls ^co^ds

£)<~p0-t>r/ntTAJT.

~£ Al&ghL! /Me-Aboih- <U)c/ieTs d^ci/s/a/J ztaI

AP/0z/c^77bA/5- i-oA cJ&7*&/- //-rfb^S C&^Pgs

MumbEZSLs j3LlorJ?A5'*o_i1^Lrhf>^-cd &fi±A aLf <£& <rt 3.

•/ILL &&/£& jfa&^s artrfcjJ /Jto/5/^J TcA

\--UguIutJ As=r $15*.^/ivrtJAs /dnrTnCJ cJ^/>7-

7&e tasTar P&ST&^tEr cJouJLA.A^.&UT^Jz'Airi

JEELj/mLjiMldk&tl^^

£dJ£&s&z34U-±

fjL£o.sjM/nojUmy a/fcfe? .s?ef{..j{./7*t*Z-j:s

£~M(LLaScht'. /yioii^i/ GAd^X a/q.

RECEVEUTR ~ COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

jMJ6JJL2Mi

"^belAcosta, Clerk
I UNITED STATES

[POSTAL SERVICE®

Serial Number

2E6LE7^S1A5

* POSTAL MOJVE^OHbm

Year Month Day __ PostOffice US Dollars and Cents

2015-08-06 761W1 '-,

.117:10 1

AmountSeventeen Dollars and 00/100 mmnncmmmmmiint

Pay 3. < Clerk t0 CoufiTiFMAsfllsj ^_5 % 18

Address f>Q fo^/t^S \ S^\ j~ j k<M^0A/ d,^JoL^)^5L (/ J£

O 2008 United States Postal Sorv ca AllR ghts Raaarved

i:ooooQfloo a: 1

*MfeserrJL&r&MT; TK. 74 /ay SEE REVERSEWARNING • NEGOTIABLE ONLY INTHEU S AND POSSESSIONS

EEB'& B7=15 ias»"
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION906**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

** **

In connection with the Quarterly Report of J.Crew Group, Inc., J.CrewIntermediate LLC and J.Crew Operating Corp. (collectively, the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the period ended October 30, 2004 (the “Report”), Millard S.Drexler and Amanda J. Bokman, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief FinancialOfficer of the Company, respectively, each certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that, to the best of their knowledge:

 

1.                   The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and

 

2.                   The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: December 14, 2004                    |
|---------------------------------------------|
|                                        |
| /s/ Millard S. Drexler                      |   |
| Millard S. Drexler

Chief Executive Officer |

 
| /s/ Amanda J. Bokman                      |   |
|-------------------------------------------|--------|
| Amanda J. Bokman

Chief Financial Officer |

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) and isnot being filed as part of the Report of as a separate disclosure document.

 

*A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retainedby the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or itsstaff upon request.*

 

 

 

----
Exhibit 32.2


            CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In  connection  with the  Annual  Report  on Form  10-KSB of  Sunshine  PCS
Corporation  (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Robert
E. Dolan,  as Principal  Accounting  Officer of the Company,  hereby  certifies,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

     (1) The Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



                                             /s/ Robert E. Dolan
                                             -------------------
                                             Name: Robert E. Dolan
                                             Title: Principal Accounting Officer
Date: April 20, 2004
#### BRANDENBURG v. BRANDENBURG.

Civ. A. No. 10210.

United States District Court District of Columbia.

April 30, 1942.

*563Jean M. Boardman, of Washington, D. C, for plaintiff.

Beatrice A. Clephane, of Washington D. C, for defendant.

ADKINS, Justice.

The complaint for maintenance states an existing marriage and that plain-tic and defendant are residents of Maryland and that defendant husband is temporarily within the District. It has been the practice to take jurisdiction of such cases. Marcum v. Marcum, 61 App.D.C. 332, 62 F.2d 871; Rhodes v. Rhodes, 36 App.D.C. 261. Defendant made no objection to jurisdiction in his answer filed March 7, 1941.

The case of Curley v. Curley, 74 App. D.C. 163, 120 F.2d 730 was decided June 2, 1941. On March 31, 1941 defendant obtained an absolute divorce from plaintiff in Arkansas, in which state he claims to have obtained a legal residence. His counsel asserts that these facts bring this case within the Curley case. The new facts were presented by way of affidavits containing copy of the Arkansas record and a motion to dismiss the complaint was denied. A supplemental answer has been filed containing these facts and a second motion to dismiss is now presented.

Since on such a motion the Court can consider only the facts set forth in the complaint this motion must also be overruled.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-03-2001
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-02-2000
<CASH>                                                 955
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       82,128
<ALLOWANCES>                                       (1,602)
<INVENTORY>                                         84,580
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   171,104
<PP&E>                                              49,334
<DEPRECIATION>                                      32,926
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     304,134
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              152,030
<BONDS>                                            265,250
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                               21,410
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                               165
<OTHER-SE>                                       (150,436)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       304,134
<SALES>                                            110,622
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   110,622
<CGS>                                               72,347
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       72,347
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    26,609
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   8,420
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      3,246
<INCOME-TAX>                                         1,552
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  1,694
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         1,694
<EPS-BASIC>                                              0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0



</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1388 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1388

 To amend title 10, United States Code, to repeal the requirement for 
      voting assistance officers for members of the Armed Forces.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 21, 2017

  Mr. Rounds introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 10, United States Code, to repeal the requirement for 
      voting assistance officers for members of the Armed Forces.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF REQUIREMENT FOR VOTING ASSISTANCE OFFICERS FOR 
              MEMBERS OF THE ARMED FORCES.

    Section 1566 of title 10, United States Code, is amended by 
striking subsection (f).
                                 <all>
```
# C_2017006EN.01002401.xml

| 9.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/24

---

Appeal brought on 2 June 2016 by Ukraine against the order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) delivered on 11 March 2015 in Case T-347/14: Yanukovych v Council

(Case C-318/16 P)

(2017/C 006/30)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Ukraine (represented by: M. Kostytska, avocat)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Viktor Viktorovych Yanukovych, Council of the European Union, European Commission

Other parties to the proceedings:

By order of 5 October 2016 the Court of Justice (Eighth Chamber) held that the appeal was inadmissible.

---
No. 57626.

#### Watrous & Co., Inc., and Lansen-Naeve Corp. *v.*United States,

protests 180439-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of resistors similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 57045, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
POLLUTION PREVENTION CONSIDERATIONS:

None.

EXPOSURE

- BASED REVIEW: No
# Oct

# image1.jpg
No. 63541.

protest 58/24659 (New York).

#### Lep Transport, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5(b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
No. 56354.

protest 176480-K (New York).

#### Arnida Products Co. *v.*United States,

*390Opinion by

Johnson, J.

From an examination of the papers in this case the court was unable to find anything to overcome the presumption of correctness of the collector’s classification. The protest was therefore overruled.
Exhibit 10.5
​
Schedule of the Directors, Executive Officers and 5% Stockholders which have entered into Franchise
Agreements or Preliminary Agreements for a Texas Roadhouse Restaurant
​
As of December 29, 2020
​
	​
​
​
​


	​


	​
​


	​


	​


	​


	​


	​


	​


	​


	​


	​



	​
	​
	Name and Ownership
	​
	Franchise
Agt. Signed
	​
	Franchise
Fee (2)
	​
	Royalty Rate
	​

	BILLINGS, MT
TEXAS ROADHOUSE OF BILLINGS, LLC
6040 DUTCHMANS LANE
LOUISVILLE, KY 40205
	    
	W. Kent Taylor (27.5%)
​
	    
	12/11/2018
	    
	$
	15,000 
	    
	​
	4.0 
	%

	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​

	BROWNSVILLE, TX
TEXAS ROADHOUSE OF BROWNSVILLE, LTD.
6040 DUTCHMANS LANE
LOUISVILLE, KY 40205
	​
​
	Gerald Morgan (3.07%)
	​
	06/14/2018
	​
	$
	15,000
	​
	​
	           4.0   
	%

	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​

	EVERETT, MA
TEXAS ROADHOUSE OF EVERETT, LLC
6040 DUTCHMANS LANE
LOUISVILLE, KY 40205
	​
	W. Kent Taylor (28.75%)
	 
	06/08/2018
	 
	$
	15,000 
	​
	​
	4.0 
	%

	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​

	FARMINGTON, NM (1)
ROADHOUSE OF FARMINGTON, NM, LLC
6040 DUTCHMANS LANE
LOUISVILLE, KY 40205
	​
	W. Kent Taylor (95.0%)
	 
	 
	 
	$
	0 
	​
	​
	3.5 
	%

	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​

	MCKINNEY, TX
ROADHOUSE OF MCKINNEY, LTD.
6040 DUTCHMANS LANE
LOUISVILLE, KY 40205
	​
	Gerald Morgan (2.0%)
	 
	09/04/2019
	 
	$
	15,000 
	​
	​
	4.0 
	%

	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​

	MUNCIE, IN
HOOSIER ROADHOUSE, LLC
13099 PARKSIDE DRIVE
FISHERS, IN 46038
	​
	W. Kent Taylor (4.91%)
	​
	04/11/2013
	​
	$
	0 
	​
	$
	50,000 
	/yr

	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​

	PORT ARTHUR, TX
TEXAS ROADHOUSE OF PORT ARTHUR, LTD.
6040 DUTCHMANS LANE
LOUISVILLE, KY 40205
	​
	W. Kent Taylor (15.0%)
​
	 
	12/21/2018
	 
	$
	15,000 
	​
	​
	4.0 
	%

	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​

	WICHITA, KS
ROADHOUSE OF KANSAS, LLC
6040 DUTCHMANS LANE
LOUISVILLE, KY 40205
	​
	W. Kent Taylor (24.05%)
​
	 
	11/26/2019
	 
	$
	15,000 
	​
	​
	4.0 
	%

	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​



​


​
	(1)	Franchise rights under Preliminary Agreement, dated March 19, 2004, are to be transferred to a location not yet identified.

​
	(2)	This fee represents the renewal fee to be paid and/or has been paid by the applicable franchisee upon the renewal of the applicable Franchise Agreement.
1

Ngo, Dan (FAA)

From: Ngo, Dan (FAA)

Sent: Wednesday, February 03, 2016 4:41 PM

To: 'Jesse Moore'

Subject: Request for Information - FAA-2015-7197

Dear Mr. Moore: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket No. FAA2015-7197). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your 

petition. 

 Describe the aircraft make(s), model(s), and type (s)(i.e. - fixed-wing,rotorcraft, lighter-than-air) for the 

proposed UAS operation. The description(s) should include the maximum weight (including payload) 

and power source (i.e. battery/gas/propane-powered). This information can be located in the aircraft 

manual(s). 

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov. Once your 

information is submitted, please save your tracking number and submit your tracking number along with the 

information submitted to the docket, and any proprietary information electronically via e-mail to myself and 

333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the information 

described above by 2/17/16. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying 

you further. 

Dan Ngo

Office of Rulemaking, Aircraft and Airport Rules Division  

Federal Aviation Administration
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MICHELE RICCI : CIVIL ACTION

:

 VS. :

:

AETNA, INC., D/B/A :

AETNA U.S. HEALTHCARE AND :

AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY : NO. 02-CV-4330

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Theodore A. Schwartz, Esquire, hereby certify that a true and correct copy of 

a letter dated July 2, 2002 from Linda C. Chiaradio, Secretary to Judge Lowell A. Reed, Jr. 

together with Judge Reed’s Scheduling and Discovery Policy, Judge Reed’s Notice to 

Counsel -- Communications with Court and Staff and Order assigning case to Magistrate 

Judge Angell was mailed on July 24, 2002 by U.S. Postal Service, First Class Mail, Postage 

Prepaid to counsel for Defendants as follows:

Patricia C. Collins, Esquire

Elliott, Reihner, Siedzikowski & Egan, P.C.

Union Meeting Corporate Center V

P.O. Box 3010

925 Harvest Drive

Blue Bell, PA 19422

 M. MARK MENDEL, LTD.

 BY: __________________________________________

THEODORE A. SCHWARTZ, ESQUIRE

ATTORNEY I.D. NO. 09256

KENNETH B. GREAR, ESQUIRE

ATTORNEY I.D. NO. 81608

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF

1620 LOCUST STREET

PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-6392

TELEPHONE NO. (215) 732-7200

FAX NO. (215) 546-3277

Date: ________________

G:\tas\Ricci\PLEADING S\PDF DOCU MEN TS\Certificate Service-Theodore A. Schwartz-7-25-02.wpd

Case 2:02-cv-04330-TJS Document 5 Filed 07/25/2002 Page 1 of 1
No. 64787.

#### Dux Co. *v.*United States,

protests 59/27621 and 59/20703 (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “A” consist of chairs similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Davies Turner & Co.*v. *United States*(45 C.C.P.A. 39, C.A.D. 669), the claim at 18 percent under the provision in paragraph 412, as modified, *supra,*for “Furniture, * * * Chairs,” was sustained. The items marked “B,” stipulated to consist of furniture the same as that in C.A.D. 669, *supra,*were held dutiable at 11 percent under the provision in said paragraph 412, as modified, *supra,*for other furniture.
No. 56947.

#### Atalanta Products Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 187442-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that the issue and merchandise herein are the same in all material respects as those involved in *Axel Stokby et al.*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 343, C. D. 358), except that in the liquidation of the entries covered by the instant protest, an allowance was made for gelatinous substance equal to 10 percent of the content of the tins, whereas there should have been a larger percentage allowed for the gelatinous substance. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited the merchandise was held dutiable at 3J4 cents per pound under paragraph 703, Tariff Act of 1930, upon the basis of the net weight of the contents of the cans, less such percentage allowance for the gelatinous substance contained in the respective tins, as set forth in the decision.
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 18

- 00431

- CR

R OLAND P OMPA G ARZA A / K / A J UAN

G ARCIA

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 396th District

Cour t

of Tarrant County (1516759D)

April 16, 2020

Opinion by Justice Birdwell

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of th e trial

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Wade Birdwell

Justice Wade Birdwell
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

Case No. 5D23-211

LT Case No. 21-CA-1705

_____________________________

FARAHNAZ GHANDI MCGLOTHIN,

Appellant,

v.

KYLE MCDONALD,

Appellee.

_____________________________

Nonfinal appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County.

Virginia Norton, Judge.

Christian J. Lake, of Alexander Degance Barnett, P.A., 

Jacksonville, for Appellant.

Thomas S. Edwards, Jr., and Jennifer L. Reiber, of Edwards & 

Ragatz, P.A., Jacksonville, for Appellee.

December 8, 2023

EDWARDS, C.J.

Appellant, Farahnaz Ghandi McGlothin, appeals the trial 

court’s order granting Appellee, Kyle McDonald’s, motion to 

amend his complaint to add a claim for punitive damages. We 

agree that Appellee’s proffer was insufficient to support a claim 

that Appellant’s placement of concrete blocks that restricted 

drainage through a common grate constituted intentional 
2

misconduct or gross negligence. Appellee proffered nothing to 

suggest that Appellant had “actual knowledge” of the 

wrongfulness of her conduct or that there was a high probability 

that it would result in harm to Appellee. See Werner Enters., Inc. 

v. Mendez, 362 So. 3d 278, 282 (Fla. 5th DCA 2023). Furthermore, 

Appellee’s proposed amended complaint improperly set forth his 

claim for punitive damages as a stand-alone count. See Keen v. 

Jennings, 327 So. 3d 435, 438–39 (Fla. 5th DCA 2021) (citing Soffer 

v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co., 187 So. 3d 1219, 1221 (Fla. 2016) and 

Varnedore v. Copeland, 210 So. 3d 741, 745 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017)); 

see also Frugoli v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc., 464 So. 2d 1292, 1293 

(Fla. 1st DCA 1985). Accordingly, we reverse, quash the order 

permitting Appellee to amend his complaint to seek punitive 

damages, and remand for further proceedings in accordance with 

this opinion.

REVERSED; ORDER QUASHED and REMANDED for further 

proceedings.

BOATWRIGHT, J., concurs.

JAY, J., dissents, without opinion.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________