alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2**I, Brian T. Marley, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Belk, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or causedsuch internal control over financial reporting to be designed under oursupervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability offinancial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likelyto adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: September 13, 2007   /s/ Brian T. Marley   Brian T. Marley  Executive Vice President, Finance  (Chief Financial Officer)
# C_2018112EN.01003001.xml

| 26.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/30

---

Judgment of the General Court of 8 February 2018 — Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe v EUIPO — Marpefa (Vieta)

(Case T-879/16) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU figurative mark Vieta - Genuine use of the trade mark - Decision taken following the annulment by the General Court of an earlier decision - Article 65(6) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 72(6) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Res judicata))

(2018/C 112/38)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: S. Malynicz, QC)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo and D. Walicka, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Marpefa, SL (Barcelona, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 October 2016 (Case R 1010/2016-4), relating to revocation proceedings between Sony Computer Entertainment Europe Ltd and Marpefa.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 4 October 2016 (Case R 1010/2016-4), relating to revocation proceedings between Sony Computer Entertainment Europe Ltd and Marpefa, SL; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 4 October 2016 (Case R 1010/2016-4), relating to revocation proceedings between Sony Computer Entertainment Europe Ltd and Marpefa, SL;

| 2. | Orders EUIPO to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders EUIPO to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 53, 20.2.2017.

1

---
# C_2017256EN.01002601.xml

| 7.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 256/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 256/26

---

Judgment of the General Court of 27 June 2017 — Aldi Einkauf v EUIPO — Fratelli Polli (ANTICO CASALE)

(Case T-327/16) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark ANTICO CASALE - Absolute grounds for refusal - Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 7(1)(b), (c) and (g) and Article 52(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009))

(2017/C 256/29)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co. OHG (Essen, Germany) (represented by: N. Lützenrath, U. Rademacher, C. Fürsen and N. Bertram, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Rajh, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Fratelli Polli, SpA (Milan, Italy) (represented by: C. Bacchini, M. Mazzitelli and E. Rondinelli, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 13 April 2016 (Case R 1337/2015-2) relating to invalidity proceedings between Aldi Einkauf and Fratelli Polli.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co. OHG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co. OHG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 287, 8.8.2016.

1

---
# C_2016145EN.01002101.xml

| 25.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 145/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 145/21

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado Contencioso-Administrativo No 4 de Madrid (Spain) lodged on 10 February 2016 — Congregación de Escuelas Pías Provincia Betania v Ayuntamiento de Getafe

(Case C-74/16)

(2016/C 145/27)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Referring court

Juzgado Contencioso-Administrativo No 4 de Madrid

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Congregación de Escuelas Pías Provincia Betania

Applicant:

Defendant: Ayuntamiento de Getafe

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Is the exemption of the Catholic Church from the Tax on Constructions, Installations and Works in respect of work to buildings intended to be used for economic activities that do not have a strictly religious purpose contrary to Article 107(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union?

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

STITH :

:

 :

VS. : C.A. NO. 02-4176

:

MERCK :

BEFORE WEINER, J.

AND NOW, this 19th day of December, 2002, the aboveentitled matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The case is to

remain in status quo and the Statute of Limitations is tolled. 

This matter remains ACTIVE. It is further understood

that all discovery and settlement discussions will continue and

if intervention by the Court is needed or desired, the parties

may ask for assistance by either filing the appropriate motions,

writing to the Court or by setting a telephone conference. The

parties shall keep the Court advised of the status of this case

and may request a firm trial date or settlement conference by

writing directly to the Court or by telephone conference. 

ATTEST: OR BY THE COURT:

BY_______________________ ________________________

 COURT ROOM DEPUTY Charles R. Weiner, SJ 

 Sheila M. Jeffers 

Case 2:02-cv-04176-CRW Document 6 Filed 12/30/2002 Page 1 of 1
No. 53464.

protest 117259-K (New York).

#### Griffon Importing Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of bottles the same in all material respects as those passed upon in *Griffon Importing Co.*v. *United States*(36 C. C. P. A. 121, C. A. D. 408), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1377 

To remove the limitation on certain amounts for which large non-rural hospitals may be reimbursed under the Healthcare Connect Fund of the 

Federal Communications Commission, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 19, 2017 

Mr. WICKER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation 

A BILL 

To remove the limitation on certain amounts for which large 

non-rural hospitals may be reimbursed under the 

Healthcare Connect Fund of the Federal Communications Commission, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Reaching Underserved 

5 Rural Areas to Lead on Telehealth Act’’. 

6 SEC. 2. HEALTHCARE CONNECT FUND. 

7 The Federal Communications Commission shall 

8 amend section 54.630 of title 47, Code of Federal RegulaVerDate Sep 11 2014 23:31 Jun 22, 2017 Jkt 069200 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6652 Sfmt 6201 E:\BILLS\S1377.IS S1377

rfrederick on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1377 IS

1 tions, by striking subsections (b) and (c) and inserting the 

2 following: 

3 ‘‘(b) PARTICIPATION OF NON-RURAL HEALTH CARE

4 PROVIDER SITES.—An eligible non-rural health care pro5 vider may receive universal service support if— 

6 ‘‘(1) a majority of the locations that the non7 rural health care provider serves are in rural areas; 

8 and 

9 ‘‘(2) the eligible non-rural health care provider 

10 serves as a Consortium Leader, as described in sec11 tion 54.631.’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
<PAGE>

Exhibit 99.1

                        WESTERN RESERVE BANCORP, INC.
                                 FORM 10-QSB
                         QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2002

                      CERTIFICATION OF FINANCIAL RESULTS


I, Edward J. McKeon, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Western
Reserve Bancorp, Inc., hereby certify the following:

|X|           This Form  10-QSB  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of
              Sections  13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
              and
|X|           The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
              material respects, the financial position and results of
              operations of Western Reserve Bancorp, Inc. as of and for the
              periods presented.


                                         /s/ Edward J. McKeon
                                         Edward J. McKeon
                                         President and Chief Executive Officer
                                         August 14, 2002



                                 Page 20 of 21
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

Certification of Chief Executive
Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350,
as created by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, the undersigned officer of United Defense Industries, Inc.
(the Company) hereby certifies, to such
officers knowledge, that:



| |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (i)     the accompanying
    Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the fiscal
    quarter ended June 30, 2003 (the Report) fully
    complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
    Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange
    Act of 1934, as amended; and
|
| | (ii)     the information
    contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
    the Company.                                                                                                                         

Dated: August 5, 2003



| |                                          
| | -----------------------------------------
| | /s/ THOMAS W. RABAUT                     
| |                                          
| | Thomas W. Rabaut                         
| | President and Chief Executive
    Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished
solely to accompany the Report pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, and is not to be incorporated by reference
into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the
date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in
such filing.

24
##### 



Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND VICE PRESIDENT, FINANCE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
    /s/ Lawrence C. Fritz, Ph.D.
    
    
    
    /s/ James T. GloverLawrence C. Fritz, Ph.D.
    
    
    
    James T. GloverPresident and Chief Executive Officer
    
    
    
    Senior Vice President, Operations andChief Financial OfficerDate: March 15, 2007
    
    
    
    Date: March 15, 2007
#### UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. William GOUVEIA, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert RAMIREZ, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Philip SEGURA, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Adolpho REYNOSO, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert Eugene MILLS, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard Raymond PIERCE, Defendant-Appellant.

Nos. 81-1271 to 81-1274, 82-1206 and 82-1278.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

July 27, 1984.

Nancy Wieben Stock, Joyce Ann Babst, Richard E. Drooyan, Asst. U.S. Attys., Los Angeles, Cal, for plaintiff-appellee.

Michael J. Treman, Santa Barbara, Cal., for Gouveia.

Joseph Francis Walsh, Los Angeles, Cal., for Ramirez.

Joel Levine, Los Angeles, Cal., for Segura.

Manuel U.A. Araujo, Los Angeles, Cal., for Reynoso.

Charles P. Diamond, Los Angeles, Cal., for Mills.

Edwin S. Saul, Encino, Cal., for Pierce.

Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, WRIGHT, CHOY, SNEED, KENNEDY, ANDERSON, HUG, SCHROEDER, POOLE, FERGUSON, and NELSON, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

These cases are remanded to their respective three judge panels for a resolution of issues not addressed in *United States v. Gouveia,*— U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 2292, 81 L.Ed.2d 146 (1984), *reversing,*704 F.2d 1116 (9th Cir.1983).
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 43 Filed 03/16/2007 Page 1 of 15
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 43 Filed 03/16/2007 Page 2 of 15
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 43 Filed 03/16/2007 Page 3 of 15
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 43 Filed 03/16/2007 Page 4 of 15
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 43 Filed 03/16/2007 Page 5 of 15
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 43 Filed 03/16/2007 Page 6 of 15
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 43 Filed 03/16/2007 Page 7 of 15
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 43 Filed 03/16/2007 Page 8 of 15
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 43 Filed 03/16/2007 Page 9 of 15
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 43 Filed 03/16/2007 Page 10 of 15
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 43 Filed 03/16/2007 Page 11 of 15
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 43 Filed 03/16/2007 Page 12 of 15
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 43 Filed 03/16/2007 Page 13 of 15
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 43 Filed 03/16/2007 Page 14 of 15
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 43 Filed 03/16/2007 Page 15 of 15
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS4722 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1039 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1039

 To indemnify local law enforcement entities for complying with valid 
               detainers issued by immigration officers.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 4, 2017

 Mr. Flake (for himself and Mr. McCain) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To indemnify local law enforcement entities for complying with valid 
               detainers issued by immigration officers.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. STATEMENT OF PURPOSE.

    The purpose of this Act is to ensure that States and localities do 
not incur costs by complying in good faith with immigration detainers 
issued by the Federal Government.

SEC. 2. FEDERAL GOVERNMENT COSTS.

    Since immigration detainers are issued by Federal officials based 
upon information about an alien's immigration status that is often only 
known by such officials, the Federal Government shall be responsible to 
pay for the costs of any legally cognizable injuries to third parties 
resulting from the issuance and execution of such detainers.

SEC. 3. INDEMNIFICATION FOR LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT.

    Section 287 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1357) 
is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(i) Subject to available appropriations, a State or its employee, 
a political subdivision of a State or its employee, or an elected 
official that receives a request from U.S. Immigration and Customs 
Enforcement to temporarily detain an alien or transport the alien to a 
Federal detention center shall be indemnified and held harmless by the 
Secretary of Homeland Security from all claims by any person that may 
arise from good faith compliance with such request.''.

SEC. 4. SAVINGS PROVISION.

    Nothing in this Act may be construed to preclude a legal cause of 
action.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2016106EN.01005101.xml

| 21.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 106/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 106/51

---

Action brought on 11 January 2016 — ZZ v EEAS

(Case F-2/16)

(2016/C 106/62)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: H.-E. von Harpe, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European External Action Service (EEAS)

Defendant:

Subject matter and description of the proceedings

Subject matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the EEAS’s decision not to reimburse the applicant his removal expenses from Zambia to Brussels.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the defendant’s decision of 12 March 2015; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the defendant’s decision of 12 March 2015;

| — | annul, if necessary, also the implicit rejection of the complaint; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul, if necessary, also the implicit rejection of the complaint;

| — | order the European External Action Service to pay the costs, including those incurred in the pre-litigation procedure. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European External Action Service to pay the costs, including those incurred in the pre-litigation procedure.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-04-2001
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          16,095
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   81,333
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (3,457)
<INVENTORY>                                    634,001
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               750,959
<PP&E>                                         290,529
<DEPRECIATION>                               (123,786)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,067,395
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          291,150
<BONDS>                                         81,250
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           278
<OTHER-SE>                                     139,924
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,067,395
<SALES>                                        356,354
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               356,354
<CGS>                                          182,811
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  332,569
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              14,558
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  9,227
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,552
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              5,675
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     5,675
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.20
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.20


</TABLE>