alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE J. CREW
OPERATING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AND
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS AND THREE MONTHS ENDED OCTOBER 28,
2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          FEB-03-2001             FEB-03-2001
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-28-2000             OCT-28-2000
<CASH>                                          21,737                       0
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                    164,623                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               217,560                       0
<PP&E>                                         252,295                       0
<DEPRECIATION>                                (94,468)                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 391,779                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          156,727                       0
<BONDS>                                        180,000                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     (1,923)                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   391,779                       0
<SALES>                                        514,231                 193,971
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               516,400                 194,767
<CGS>                                          280,800                 104,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  498,304                 177,851
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              17,054                   5,740
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,042                  11,176
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (420)                 (4,520)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                622                   6,656
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                       622                   6,656
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0                       0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

I,Wilson W. Cheung, certify that:

1. I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q of AXT, Inc.;

2. Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed inthis report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors:

(a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b) Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
| Dated: May 11, 2007 | By:    | /s/ Wilson W. Cheung    |
|---------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                |   | Wilson W. Cheung        |
|                |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>

EXHIBIT 27 - Financial Data Schedule

THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS INCLUDED IN
THE  REGISTRANT'S  FORM  10-QSB  FOR THE 3 MONTHS  ENDED  JUNE  30,  2000 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>

<S>                                                           <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                                 3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                              dec-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                                   jun-30-2000
<CASH>                                                         1,682,808
<SECURITIES>                                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                                  5,298,536
<ALLOWANCES>                                                   451,919
<INVENTORY>                                                    6,870,716
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                               14,055,941
<PP&E>                                                         6,104,017
<DEPRECIATION>                                                 3,156,083
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                                 17,966,871
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                          9,030,857
<BONDS>                                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                          0
<PREFERRED>                                                    0
<COMMON>                                                       5,198,032
<OTHER-SE>                                                     1,953,470
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                                   17,966,871
<SALES>                                                        11,008,975
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                               11,008,975
<CGS>                                                          6,947,310
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                                  3,554,641
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                             183,470
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                                323,554
<INCOME-TAX>                                                   80,442
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                            243,112
<DISCONTINUED>                                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                                0
<CHANGES>                                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                                   243,112
<EPS-BASIC>                                                    0.09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                                  0.09



</TABLE>
Teacher Retirement Sydm of lb%aa 

hEtin, - T6%6: 

Dear Sir: Kttentioar- Mr. K. E. Davis 

Opinion I?cGO-l& 

Ret Teacher Retirement System -- 

Eaneficiary -- hembar designation 

under assumed name. 

Your question for a legal opinion from this department is as follows: 

"May a member of the Teacher Retimm6nt System legally designate a 

beneficiary to receive the amount of hi6 aoomaulated aoatributions 

in case of hi6 d66th before Mtirament by using as his signature a 

name other than his legal name? 

"The abuse question is prompted by the follorring aircum&anoar a 

Personal Data Form ha6 be6n issued to I&v. Johu x. SlaVik, a member 

of the Teaoher Reti.rmncnt; System whose aooount ia being carried under that 

name. This Form contains a section that enables a member to designate 

a beneficiary to receive the amount of his aaaumulated contributions 

in aase of his death before retirtaneat. Mr. Slavik informs us that 

John M. Slavik i6 not his legal name but is the nam6 he has been known 

by ainae Shorbly after his birth at whioh time his mother remarried. 

There ha6 be6n no action taken in aonneation with changing his legal 

name, John Rudolf Mazooh to John P. Slavik. It is his desire, honever, 

to designate a beneficiary over his signature as John M. Slavik, if 

such action vuuld be held legal." 

Ohio execution, whether of contract, conveyanae, receipt or instrument 

whatsoever, under a fiatitious or assumed nam6 is a8 valid and binding 

in law a6 though he had exeouted in his legal name. It is a question of 

identity. If the persolr executing is the per6on t6 be bound, then he is 

bound by whatever name h6 exeoutes. It 088 make no differenoe whether the 

arsumed name is a fictitious name or that of another person. (SO Tex. Jur. 

692, Sea. 11). Neither oan it make any differenoe a8 to why, or the r6asona 

for the us6 of a fiotitious or assumed name. One who ia unable to write hi6 

name may neverbheless validly exeaute by his mark or any character indicating 

hi6 intention to execute. Such instruments exeouted in any of the mode6 

above mentioned are not only binding upon the party exaouting but they ar6 

likewise bind4 upon th6 other parby to the inatI%aent. In sther words, the 

instrwwnt 16 in all respacts valid and enforoaable aeo6Yding to its legal 

purport and effeot. 
Teacher Retirament System of Texss -Page 2 O-1864 

very truly yours 

A;p1ORNR~GENERALOFTEXkS 

6/ Ooie Spear 

By Ooie Sper 

AaaiEtaut 

APPROVED Jan 27j 1940 

6/ Ge,rald C. 8-k6I 

~GESALDC.MbNN 

ATTONNEY GENEWU OF '!fF.XhS 

&PPROVED OPINION UWMITX'EE EX EL 111. B. CHARIMAN
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS4705 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 101 (Friday, May 24, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 31520]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-12511]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting

TIME AND DATE:  10:00 a.m., Friday, June 21, 2013.

PLACE:  1155 21st St. NW., Washington, DC, 9th Floor Commission 
Conference Room.

STATUS:  Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Surveillance, Examinations, and Enforcement 
Matters. In the event that the time, date, or place of this meeting 
changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, 
or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's Web site at 
http://www.cftc.gov.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:  Melissa D. Jurgens, 202-418-5516.

Natise Stowe,
Executive Assistant.
[FR Doc. 2013-12511 Filed 5-22-13; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
```
2008 Decisions

Opinions of the United

States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit

5-30-2008

USA v. Stitt

Precedential or Non-Precedential: Non-Precedential

Docket No. 06-2572

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2008

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 2008 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova

University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

Recommended Citation

"USA v. Stitt" (2008). 2008 Decisions. Paper 1104.

http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_2008/1104
 Honorable William H. Stafford, Jr., Senior District Judge for the United States *

District Court for the Northern District of Florida, sitting by designation.

NOT PRECEDENTIAL

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

___________

No. 06-2572

___________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

vs.

ANTONIO STITT,

 Appellant

___________

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Pennsylvania

(D.C. Criminal No. 03-cr-00259-1)

District Judge: The Honorable Alan N. Bloch

___________

Submitted Under Third Circuit LAR 34.1(a)

May 21, 2008

BEFORE: SMITH and NYGAARD, Circuit Judges,

and STAFFORD, District Judge. *

(Filed: May 30, 2008)
2

___________

OPINION OF THE COURT

___________

NYGAARD, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a resentence imposed after a Booker remand. The

conviction in this case arose from a guilty plea on drug charges. Stitt filed a timely

appeal.

Because we write exclusively for the parties, who are familiar with the facts and

proceedings below, we will not revisit them here. Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386

U.S. 738 (1967), Stitt’s appointed counsel has examined the record, concluded that there

are no non-frivolous issues for review, and requested permission to withdraw. 

This request was accompanied by a brief identifying one issue as arguably

possessing merit: whether prior convictions, not included in the Indictment nor admitted

to by the defendant, can lawfully be considered in determining his sentence. Stitt argued

that the use of his prior convictions to determine his sentence violated his Sixth

Amendment and due process rights. He asserted that Almendarez-Torres v. United States,

523 U.S. 224 (1998), which permits consideration of his prior convictions, has been “all

but overruled” and should not be applied in this case. 

Stitt’s counsel, however, concedes that this Supreme Court precedent remains

binding in this instance. Additionally, counsel acknowledges that , even post-Booker, the
3

District Court does not have authority to impose a sentence lower than the statutory

minimum, which in this case was twenty years. 

Accordingly, we find that there are no non-frivolous arguments raised in this

appeal. We will grant counsel's motion to withdraw and we will affirm the judgment of

the District Court.
# C_2019220EN.01003301.xml

| 1.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 220/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 220/33

---

Judgment of the General Court of 8 May 2019 — PT v EIB

(Case T-571/16) (1)

(Civil service - Members of staff of the EIB - Reports procedure - Career evaluation report - 2014 appraisal exercise - Pre-litigation procedure - Admissibility - Right to be heard - Principle of the presumption of innocence - Liability - Non-material damage)

(2019/C 220/42)

Language of the case: Swedish

Parties

Applicant: PT (represented by: E. Nordh, lawyer)

Defendant: European Investment Bank (represented initially by G. Nuvoli, E. Raimond, T. Gilliams and G. Faedo, and subsequently by G. Faedo and M. Loizou, acting as Agents, and by M. Johansson, B. Wägenbaur, lawyers, and J. Currall, Barrister)

Re:

Application based on Article 270 TFEU and Article 50a of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union and seeking, in the first place, annulment of: (i) the EIB decision establishing the definitive version of the applicant’s staff report for the 2014 appraisal exercise; (ii) the applicant’s appraisal report for the 2014 appraisal exercise; (iii) the EIB decisions, for 2015, neither to promote him, grant him an individual bonus nor increase his salary by 1.20% and; in the second place, compensation for the damage allegedly sustained by the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls PT’s appraisal report for the 2014 appraisal exercise; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls PT’s appraisal report for the 2014 appraisal exercise;

| 2. | Orders the European Investment Bank (EIB) to pay PT the sum of EUR 2 000 in compensation for the non-material damage suffered, together with default interest from the date of delivery of the present judgment at the rate fixed by the European Central Bank (ECB) for its main refinancing operations, increased by 3.5 points; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Investment Bank (EIB) to pay PT the sum of EUR 2 000 in compensation for the non-material damage suffered, together with default interest from the date of delivery of the present judgment at the rate fixed by the European Central Bank (ECB) for its main refinancing operations, increased by 3.5 points;

| 3. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 4. | Orders the EIB to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the EIB to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 111, 29.3.2016 (case initially registered before the European Union Civil Service Tribunal under Case No F-145/15 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1.9.2016).

---
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 120 

Note 15. Benefits Due and Payable 

Benefits Due and Payable as of September 30, 2022, and 2021 

(In billions of dollars) 2022 2021 

Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance - SSA ...................................................... 98.6 87.4 

Grants to states for Medicaid - HHS ......................................................................... 54.8 52.7 

Federal Supplementary Medical Insurance (Medicare Parts B and D) - HHS .............. 42.9 43.8 

Federal Hospital Insurance (Medicare Part A) - HHS ................................................. 42.1 35.9 

Federal Disability Insurance - SSA ........................................................................... 24.2 20.5 

Unemployment Insurance - DOL .............................................................................. 11.1 19.2 

All other benefits programs ...................................................................................... 14.6 14.4 

 Total benefits due and payable ............................................................................. 288.3 273.9 

Benefits due and payable are amounts owed to program recipients or medical service providers as of September 30 that 

have not been paid. Please refer to the financial statements of HHS, SSA, and DOL for more information.
Document

Exhibit 10.9



SUMMARY OF NON-MANAGEMENT DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
As of January 1, 2021
															
	Function	 	Amount Paid	 	Form of Payment
	 	 	 	 	 
	Annual Stock Retainer	 	$95,000 annually	 	Payable in quarterly increments in shares of company common stock at its fair market value
	 	 	 	 	 
	Annual Cash Retainer	 	$70,000 annually	 	Payable in cash in quarterly increments
	 	 	 	 	 
	Audit Committee Members Meeting Fee	 	$15,000 annually	 	Payable in cash in quarterly increments
	 	 	 	 	 
	Audit Committee Chair Meeting Fee		$30,000 annually		Payable in cash in quarterly increments
					
	Compensation Committee Members Meeting Fee		$10,000 annually		Payable in cash in quarterly increments
					
	Compensation Committee Chair Meeting Fee	 	$20,000 annually	 	Payable in cash in quarterly increments
					
	Nominating & Governance Committee Members Meeting Fee		$10,000 annually		Payable in cash in quarterly increments
					
	Nominating & Governance Committee Chair Meeting Fee		$15,000 annually		Payable in cash in quarterly increments
					
	Independent Chairman of the Board	 	$75,000 annually	 	Payable in cash in quarterly increments
-81 -80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75

 37

 38

 39

 40

★

▲

▲

▲ ▲

★ ▲ ▲

▲

▲ 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

07/18

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 18 Jul 06

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.92 N 77.01 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

■

■

★ ■ ■

■

■

● ★

●

●

★ ●

●

●

●
# C_2018022EN.01003702.xml

| 22.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/37

---

Judgment of the General Court of 30 November 2017 — Koton Mağazacilik Tekstil Sanayi ve Ticaret v EUIPO — Nadal Esteban (STYLO & KOTON)

(Case T-687/16) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU figurative mark STYLO & KOTON - Absolute ground for refusal - Article 52(1)(b) of (EC) Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 59(1)(b) of (EU) Regulation 2017/1001) - No bad faith))

(2018/C 022/51)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Koton Mağazacilik Tekstil Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ (Istanbul, Turkey) (represented by: J. Güell Serra and E. Stoyanov Edissonov, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Joaquín Nadal Esteban (Alcobendas, Spain) (represented by: J. Donoso Romero, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 June 2016 (Case R 1779/2015-2), relating to invalidity proceedings between Koton Mağazacilik Tekstil Sanayi ve Ticaret and Mr Nadal Esteban.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Koton Mağazacilik Tekstil Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Koton Mağazacilik Tekstil Sanayi ve Ticaret AŞ to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 410, 7.11.2016.

1

---
No. 56336.

protest 175872-K (New York).

#### McKesson & Robbins, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the merchandise, issues, and facts herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested not found were not in fact received by the importer. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited it was held that duty and internal revenue tax are not assessable upon such portions of the merchandise as were reported by the inspector as manifested not found. The protest was sustained to this extent.