alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
SARBANES-OXLEY 302(a) CERTIFICATION

I, David S. Bennett, certify that:

1. I have  reviewed  this  Annual  Report  on  Form  10-KSB/A  of Bio  Solutions
Manufacturing, Inc

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a- 15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

     a.  Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused  such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
     b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and
     c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over  financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's  fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying  officer(s) and I have disclosed,  based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,  to the
registrant's  auditors  and the audit  committee  of the  registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a. All significant  deficiencies  and material  weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and
     b. Any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves  management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial matters.

Dated: January 12, 2006       By:  /s/ David S. Bennett
                                ---------------------------------
                                David S. Bennett
                                Chief Executive Officer
WHAT’S NEW!!

September 11, 2014

 Volume I, Bulletin No. 2014-

10: 2014 Year-end Closing

(Revised)

September 8, 2014

 Volume I, Part 2, Chapter

4600: Treasury Reporting

Instructions for Credit Reform

Legislation

 Volume I, Part 2, Chapter

4700: Agency Reporting

Requirements for the

Financial Report of the United

States Government

CRM CONTACTS

CRM MAILBOX:

gwa.crmd.users@fiscal.treasury.gov

IPAC- Dominique McCreary

Dominique.McCreary@fiscal.treasury

.gov (202)874-6352

TDO Payments- Luz Davila Lopez

Luz.Davila.Lopez@fiscal.treasury.gov 

(202)874-8599

NTDO Payments- Maria Davis

Maria.Davis@fiscal.treasury.gov

(202)874-8079

Collections- Katy Borys

Katy.Borys@fiscal.treasury.gov

(202)874-9005

Customer Relationship Management

TIPOFTHEWEEK

The Treasury Financial Manual 

(TFM)

The TFM is the Department of the Treasury’s official 

publication of policies, procedures, and instructions 

concerning financial management in the Federal 

Government. It is intended to promote the Government’s 

 financial integrity and operational efficiency.

Volume I: Federal Agencies

Instructs and guides the Federal Government’s departments, agencies, and other 

concerned parties, in areas of central accounting and reporting; payrolls, deductions, 

and withholdings; disbursing; deposits; and other fiscal matters.

Table of Contents

 Part 1: Introduction

 Part 2: Central Accounting and Reporting

 Part 3: Payrolls, Deductions, and Withholdings

 Part 4: Disbursing

 Part 4A: Payment-Related Activities Within the

Authority Granted to the U.S. Chief

Disbursing Officer (CDO)

 Part 5: Deposit Regulations

 Part 6: Other Fiscal Matters

Quick Links

 Table of Contents

 Announcements

 Bulletins

 Supplements

 Transmittal Letters

http://tfm.fiscal.treasury.gov/v1.html
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 99-61

                          MONTHLY SERVICER CERTIFICATE

Pursuant to Section 4.01(d)(ii) of the Securitization Property Servicing
Agreement, dated as of March 9, 2001 (the "Agreement"), between The Detroit
Edison Company, as servicer (the "Servicer") and The Detroit Edison
Securitization Funding LLC, the Servicer does hereby certify as follows:

Capitalized terms used herein have their respective meanings as set forth in the
Agreement.

For the Monthly Period:  December 2004
                         -------------

1.     BILLINGS:

a)    Monthly kWh Consumption:    3,377,380,790
                                  -------------
b)    Applicable SB Charge:           $ 0.00374
                                      ---------
c)    Total SB Charge Amount Invoiced this Month
      (Net of .5% uncollectible factor):                        $ 12,567,072.42
                                                                ---------------
d)    Cumulative SB Charge Amount Invoiced this
      Remittance Period:                                       $ 181,227,266.56
                                                               ----------------

2.     REMITTANCES:

a)    Weighted Average Days outstanding:                                51
                                                                        --
b)    Total Amount Remitted this Month:                    $ 14,866,583.08
                                                           ---------------
c)    Cumulative Amount Remitted this Remittance Period:   $180,250,400.30
                                                           ---------------

3.     BALANCES ON SUBACCOUNTS (AT END OF MONTHLY PERIOD):

m)    Collection Account Balance:                 $ 65,841,021.78
                                                  ---------------
n)    Reserve Subaccount Balance:                        $ 587.36
                                                        ---------
o)    Series Overcollateralization Subaccount Balance:    $198.08
                                                          -------
p)    Series Capital Subaccount Balance:           $ 7,438,948.63
                                                   --------------

Executed as of January 12, 2005.

                                    THE DETROIT EDISON COMPANY
                                    as Servicer

                                    By:   /s/  Peter B. Oleksiak
                                        -----------------------------------
                                    Name:  Peter B. Oleksiak
                                    Title:  Director and Assistant Controller
Case 2:03-cv-06082-ER Document 77 Filed 04/20/09 Page 1 of 16
Case 2:03-cv-06082-ER Document 77 Filed 04/20/09 Page 2 of 16
Case 2:03-cv-06082-ER Document 77 Filed 04/20/09 Page 3 of 16
Case 2:03-cv-06082-ER Document 77 Filed 04/20/09 Page 4 of 16
Case 2:03-cv-06082-ER Document 77 Filed 04/20/09 Page 5 of 16
Case 2:03-cv-06082-ER Document 77 Filed 04/20/09 Page 6 of 16
Case 2:03-cv-06082-ER Document 77 Filed 04/20/09 Page 7 of 16
Case 2:03-cv-06082-ER Document 77 Filed 04/20/09 Page 8 of 16
Case 2:03-cv-06082-ER Document 77 Filed 04/20/09 Page 9 of 16
Case 2:03-cv-06082-ER Document 77 Filed 04/20/09 Page 10 of 16
Case 2:03-cv-06082-ER Document 77 Filed 04/20/09 Page 11 of 16
Case 2:03-cv-06082-ER Document 77 Filed 04/20/09 Page 12 of 16
Case 2:03-cv-06082-ER Document 77 Filed 04/20/09 Page 13 of 16
Case 2:03-cv-06082-ER Document 77 Filed 04/20/09 Page 14 of 16
Case 2:03-cv-06082-ER Document 77 Filed 04/20/09 Page 15 of 16
Case 2:03-cv-06082-ER Document 77 Filed 04/20/09 Page 16 of 16
UNITED STATES NAVY–MARINE CORPS

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

_________________________

No. 201600398

_________________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Appellee

v.

JESUS E. OLMEDO

Private First Class (E-2), U.S. Marine Corps

Appellant

_________________________

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary

Military Judge: Colonel James K. Carberry, USMC.

Convening Authority: Commanding Officer, Headquarters and 

Support Battalion, Marine Corps Installations West, Marine Corps 

Base, Camp Pendleton, CA.

Staff Judge Advocate’s Recommendation: Lieutenant Colonel Todd 

J. Enge, USMC.

For Appellant: Major Lee C. Kindlon, USMCR.

For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.

_________________________

Decided 24 January 2017

_________________________

Before MARKS, GLASER-ALLEN, and JONES, Appellate Military Judges

_________________________

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of 

error, we affirm the findings and sentence as approved by the convening 

authority. Art. 66(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866(c). 

For the Court

R.H. TROIDL

Clerk of Court
<PAGE>

                                                                       Ex. 10.2

                                PROMISSORY NOTE

$285,587.34                                                 BALTIMORE, MARYLAND
                                                                 MARCH 11, 1998

WITHIN THREE YEARS, the undersigned promises to pay to the order of Chapman 
Holdings, Inc., Two hundred eighty-five thousand five hundred eighty-seven 
dollars and thirty-four cents ($285,587.34), at its offices in Baltimore, 
Maryland together with interest thereon from the date hereof until paid at the 
rate of 5.5% per annum.


                                            /s/ Nathan A. Chapman, Jr.
                                            ---------------------------------
                                            NATHAN A. CHAPMAN, JR.
No. 52902.

#### Alltransport, Incorporated *v.*United States,

protest 142750-K (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

There was some question as to the actual date of liquidation, which was not resolved by examination of the protest and official papers. In view of the fact, however, that plaintiff failed to appear or to prosecute its case, the protest was dismissed.
STATE OF LOUISIANA

COURT OF APPEAL, Fl,RST CIRCUIT

MELISSA A. RAIGAN

VERSUS

TROY C. RUSICH

In Re: Troy C. Rusich, applying

Judicial District Court, 

2022-10617. 

NO. 2022 CW 1353

MARCH 6, 2023

for supervisory writs, 22nd

Parish of St. Tammany, No. 

BEFORE: WELCH, PENZATO, AND LANIER, JJ. 

WRIT DENIED. 

COURT OF APPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

O\.C,{J

DEPUTY CLERK OF COURT

FOR THE COURT

JEW

AHP

WIL
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.4


                     CHASE MANHATTAN AUTO OWNER TRUST 2000-A
                           ANNUAL ISSUER'S CERTIFICATE
                                       of
                            COMPLIANCE WITH INDENTURE

         The undersigned certifies that she is an Authorized Officer of
Wilmington Trust Company, not in its individual capacity, but solely as Owner
Trustee for Chase Manhattan Auto Owner Trust 2000-A and that she is duly
authorized to execute and deliver this certificate on behalf of the Issuer in
connection with Section 3.9 of the Indenture between the Issuer and Wells Fargo
Bank Minnesota, National Association, as Indenture Trustee, dated as of December
1, 2000 (the "Indenture"). All capitalized terms used herein without definition
shall have the respective meanings specified in the Indenture.

         The undersigned further certifies that a review of the activities of
the Issuer for the preceding calendar year has been made under her supervision
and, to the best of her knowledge, based on such review, the Issuer has complied
with all conditions and convenants in all material respects under the Indenture
throughout the preceding calendar year.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have affixed hereto my signature as of this 25th
day of March, 2003.

                     CHASE MANHATTAN AUTO OWNER TRUST 2000-A
                     BY: WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY, not in its individual
                     capacity, but solely as Owner Trustee


                     /s/ Linda C. Mack
                     --------------------------------------
                     Name: Linda C. Mack
                     Title: Administrative Account Manager

         Chase Manhattan Bank USA, National Association, as Servicer, hereby
requests that Wilmington Trust Company, as Owner Trustee, execute the above
Issuer's Certificate and deliver it to Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, National
Association, as Indenture Trustee.


                     CHASE MANHATTAN BANK USA,
                     NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Servicer

                     /s/ Richard J. Naeder
                     --------------------------------------
                     Richard J. Naeder
                     Authorized Signatory
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CRIMINAL

:

 v. :

:

KEVIN R. JENKINS : NO. 04-506-2

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 6th day of June, 2005, it is hereby ORDERED that the defendant’s

Pro-Se Motion to Dismiss My Court Appointed Attorney and Appoint new Counsel (DOCUMENT #61)

hereby GRANTED. It is further ORDERED that Patrick J. Egan, Esquire is appointed as counsel for the

above defendant pursuant to the Criminal Justice Act.

 BY THE COURT

 

 Berle M. Schiller, J.
(V. D. *27)*

Entry No. 761225, etc.

#### Astra Trading Corp. et al. *v.*United States

(Decided September 19, 1956)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn (Edward N. Glad*of counsel) for the plaintiffs.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

WilsoN, Judge:

These matters are presently before me on remands from classification proceedings decided by the first division of this court in *Astra Trading Corp.*v. *United States,*34 Cust. Ct. 408, Abstract 59153; *M. Adler’s Son, Inc., and Daniel F. Young, Inc., et al.*v. *United States,*34 Cust. Ct. 284, Abstract 58775. The judgments entered therein stated: “* * * that the matters be remanded to a single iudge in reappraisement pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d).”

The matters have been submitted for decision upon an agreed statement of facts entered into by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto.

Upon the agreed facts, I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (d)), to be the proper basis for determining the values of the involved merchandise and that such values are as set forth in schedule *“A,”*hereto attached and made a part hereof, less the deductions from such itemized unit prices as invoiced, cases and packing as shown in said schedule “A.”

I further find such values to be the dutiable values of said merchandise.

The actions having been abandoned insofar a.s all other items of merchandise are concerned, to that extent they are dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
---

CERTIFICATIONS

The undersigned, Ross J. Tocher, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | the annual report on Form 20-F of Qwick Media Inc. for
      the year ended December 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Qwick Media Inc.                                                               

Dated: May 3, 2011

| | /s/
      Ross J. Tocher             
| | -------------------------------------
| | Ross J. Tocher                       
| | President and Chief Executive Officer
| | (Principal Executive Officer)        

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Qwick Media Inc.
and will be retained by Qwick Media Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
# C_2015245EN.01003901.xml

| 27.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 245/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 245/39

---

Action brought on 22 May 2015 — Axa Mediterranean Holding v Commission

(Case T-258/15)

(2015/C 245/46)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Axa Mediterranean Holding, S.A (Palma de Mallorca, Spain) (represented by: J. Buendía Sierra, D. Armesto Macías and A. Balcells Cartagena, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

| — | annul Article 1 of the contested decision in so far as it declares that the new administrative interpretation of Article 12 TRLIS adopted by the Spanish administration must be regarded as state aid which is incompatible with the interior market; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Article 1 of the contested decision in so far as it declares that the new administrative interpretation of Article 12 TRLIS adopted by the Spanish administration must be regarded as state aid which is incompatible with the interior market;

| — | annul Article 4(1) of the contested decision in so far as it requires the Kingdom of Spain to put an end to the alleged aid scheme as described in Article 1; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Article 4(1) of the contested decision in so far as it requires the Kingdom of Spain to put an end to the alleged aid scheme as described in Article 1;

| — | annul Article 4(2)(3)(4) and (5) of the contested decision in so far as it requires the Kingdom of Spain to recover the amounts considered by the Commission to be State aid; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Article 4(2)(3)(4) and (5) of the contested decision in so far as it requires the Kingdom of Spain to recover the amounts considered by the Commission to be State aid;

| — | in the alternative, limit the scope of the recovery obligation imposed on the Kingdom of Spain by Article 4(2) of the contested decision in the same terms as in the first and second decisions; and |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, limit the scope of the recovery obligation imposed on the Kingdom of Spain by Article 4(2) of the contested decision in the same terms as in the first and second decisions; and

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The contested decision in the present proceedings is the same as in cases T-12/15, Banco de Santander and Santusa v Commission and T-252/15 Ferrovial SA and Others v Commission.

Banco de Santander and Santusa

Commission

Ferrovial SA and Others

Commission.

The pleas in law and the main arguments put forward are similar to those relied on in those cases.

---
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 10-8 Filed 08/05/2002 Page 1 of 12
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 10-8 Filed 08/05/2002 Page 2 of 12
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 10-8 Filed 08/05/2002 Page 3 of 12
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 10-8 Filed 08/05/2002 Page 4 of 12
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 10-8 Filed 08/05/2002 Page 5 of 12
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 10-8 Filed 08/05/2002 Page 6 of 12
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 10-8 Filed 08/05/2002 Page 7 of 12
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 10-8 Filed 08/05/2002 Page 8 of 12
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 10-8 Filed 08/05/2002 Page 9 of 12
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 10-8 Filed 08/05/2002 Page 10 of 12
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 10-8 Filed 08/05/2002 Page 11 of 12
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 10-8 Filed 08/05/2002 Page 12 of 12
# C_2017402EN.01002501.xml

| 27.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 402/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 402/25

---

Judgment of the General Court of 10 October 2017 — Solelec and Others v Parliament

(Case T-281/16) (1)

1

((Public works contracts - Tendering procedure - Electrical work (high-voltage current) as part of the project for the extension and refurbishment of the Parliament’s Konrad Adenauer building in Luxembourg - Rejection of the tender submitted by a tenderer and decision to award the contract to another tenderer - Manifest error of assessment - Selection criteria - Technical and professional capacity - Award criteria - Abnormally low tender - Market value))

(2017/C 402/32)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Solelec SA (Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg), Mannelli & Associés SA (Bertrange, Luxembourg), Paul Wagner et fils SA (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) and Socom SA (Foetz, Luxembourg) (represented by S. Marx, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by M. Mraz and L. Chrétien, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for the annulment, first, of the Parliament decision of 27 May 2016 rejecting the tender submitted by the applicants in respect of lot No 75 in the context of the tender procedure INLO-D-UPIL-T-14-A04, entitled ‘Electricity — power’ concerning the project to extend and modernise the Konrad Adenauer building in Luxembourg (Luxembourg), and secondly, the decision awarding that lot to another tenderer.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Solelec SA, Mannelli & Associés SA, Paul Wagner et fils SA and Socom SA to pay the costs, including including those incurred in the proceedings for interim measures. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Solelec SA, Mannelli & Associés SA, Paul Wagner et fils SA and Socom SA to pay the costs, including including those incurred in the proceedings for interim measures.

---

(1)  OJ C 260, 18.7.2016.

1

---