alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bear Island Paper Company LLC (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Peter M. Brant, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ Peter M. BrantPeter M. Brant Chief Executive Officer November 14, 2003




This certification accompanies
the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Act of 1934, as amended.



13
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a Priority Mail Express International, Priority Mail International & First-Class Package International Service contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Competitive Product List in the Mail Classification Schedule.

# DATES:

Date of notice: November 15, 2023.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Christopher C. Meyerson, (202) 268-7820.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 7, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express International, Priority Mail International & First-Class Package International Service Contract 30 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-43 and CP2024-43.                

Colleen Hibbert-Kapler,

Attorney, Ethics and Legal Compliance.

[FR Doc. 2023-25237 Filed 11-14-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
COALITION PROVISIONAL AUTHORITY
MEMORANDUM NUMBER 9

APPOINTMENT OF DEPUTY MINISTERS

Pursuant to my authority as Administrator of the Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA),
and under the laws and usages of war, and consistent with relevant U.N. Security Council
resolutions, including Resolutions 1483 and 1511 (2003),

Noting that appointments of interim deputy Iraqi ministers provide key opportunities to advance
the CPA’s efforts to restore and establish representative government institutions in Iraq,
including national ministry staffs that reflect the ethnic, religious and cultural diversity of the
Iraqi people and the crucial role that Iraqi women must assume in achieving an internationally
recognized, representative government of Iraq;

Recognizing that the Governing Council of Iraq in performing its functions on behalf of
the people of Iraq has nominated Deputy Ministers to assume responsibility of the daily
administration of the Iraqi Ministries,

Implementing CPA Regulation Number 6, Governing Council of Iraq (CPA/REG/13 Jul
2003/06),

Thereby promulgate the following:

Section 1
Appointment of Interim Deputy Ministers

The Administrator shall have the exclusive authority to appoint Deputy Ministers.
Unless specifically appointed in writing by the Administrator, no individual may
assume the position of Deputy Minister or exercise the authority or enjoy the
privileges of such office.

Section 2
Exception for Currently Serving Deputy Ministers

Notwithstanding Section 1 of this Memorandum, individuals who are serving as
Acting Deputy Ministers on the effective date of this Memorandum may continue to
hold the position of Acting Deputy Minister, and exercise the authority and enjoy the
privileges of such office, until removed by the Administrator.

CPA/MEM/25 Feb 2004/09


Section 3
Entry into Force

ae, shall enter into force on the date of signature.

YL stotey

L. Paul Bremer, Administrator
Coalition Provisional Authority

CPA/MEM/25 Feb 2004/09
iT ipac (TRA: GOVERNMENTAL
PAYMENT AND
COLLECTION System

IPAC Operational Metrics for September 2022

Volume by Transaction Type

Dollar Amount % of Total Dollar Amount| Number of Transactions] _% of Total Number of Transactions
Fiduciary (Investment & Borrowing) 24,548, 564,968,622 99.67% 23,852] 13.39%)
[Buy/Sell 72,281,100,747| 0.29%| 152,895) 35.84%
[Benefits (RITS) 9,691 808,349] 0.04% 518 0.29%
[Check Aftermath (TRACS) 331,376,079 0.00%| 860] 0.48%
[zero Dollar | 0.00%6| | 0.00%
[Grand Total - September 2022 24,630,869,253,796| 100.0% 178,125 10.00%
[Grand Total - August 2022 27,305,272,762,715| z 10.00%
[August to September Change -2,674,403,508,919
Percentage Change “9.8%
[Grand Total - September 2021 9,005,054,985,807|
[Sept 2021 to Sept 2022 Change 15,625,814,267,989

Percentage Change 173.5%
No. 53446.

protest 139899-K (Detroit).

#### The J. L. Hudson Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). The claim of the plaintiff was therefore sustained.
Case No. 7,818.

#### In re KINGSLEY.

[6 Ben. 300;1 7 N. B. R. 558.]

District Court, S. D. New York.

Jan., 1873.

Examination op Bankrupt.-

Where an order for the examination of a bankrupt is issued at the instance of a creditor who has duly proved his debt, the bankrupt cannot refuse to be sworn under the order, by reason of his claiming that he has an offset which extinguishes the creditor’s debt, and desires to file a petition for the re-examination of the claim.

In this matter the register certified to the court, that he had made an order for the examination of the bankrupt [Norman W. Kingsley], under the 26th section of the bankruptcy act [of 1867 (14 Stat. 529)], on the application of one Showers, a creditor who had duly proved his debt; that, on the return of the order, the bankrupt declined to be sworn, claiming that Showers was not a creditor, and was not returned as such in the schedule attached to the petition, and that any indebtedness which had ever existed from the bankrupt to Showers had been offset and extinguished by a counter indebtedness from Showers before the filing of the petition; and that he desired to file a petition for the re-examination of Showers’ claim. •

By the Register:

[I, Henry Wilder Allen, register in bankruptcy, of said district, haying the above entitled matter in charge, do hereby certify that on the 4th day of January, 1873, upon the application of Daniel H. Showers, a creditor of said bankrupt, who has duly proved his debt herein, I made and issued an order for the examination of said bankrupt, under the twenty-sixth section of the bankrupt act, and appointed the 13th day of January, 1873, at 3 o’clock p. m., as the time for the said examination, which said order was duly served upon the said bankrupt; that on the said 13th day of January, 1873, pursuant to said order, the said bankrupt attended before me with P. C. Bowman, Esq., his counsel, and the said creditor appeared by William Peet, Esq., his counsel, and the said examination being called, the said bankrupt, by advice of counsel, declined 'to be sworn and examined under the twenty-sixth section of the bankrupt act, under the order issued upon the application of the said Daniel H. Showers, claiming that said Showers is not a creditor, and was not so returned on the schedules of the said bankrupt, and that any indebtedness that ever existed from said bankrupt to said Showers, was offset and extinguished by a counter indebtedness from the said Showers to the said bankrupt before the filing of his petition, and for the further reason that he. the said bankrupt, desires to file a petition for the re-examination of the said claim. And at the request of the counsel for said parties I have made this certificate, that such order may be made herein as to the court may seem just and proper.] 2

1

 [Reported by Robert D. Benedict, Esq., and here reprinted by permission.]

2

 [Prom 7 N. B. R. 55S.]

BLATCHPORD, District Judge.

So long as the debt stands proved and unimpeached, the claim stated to have been made by the bankrupt before the register furnishes no ground for a refusal of the bankrupt to be sworn and examined.
(Reap. Dec. 10299)

Entry No. 33446.

#### F. *W.*Woolworth Company *v.*United States

(Decided July 12, 1962)

*Sharretts, Paley & Garter*for the plaintiff.

*Joseph D. Guilfoyle,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

*357Foed, Judge:

The appeal for reappraisement listed above has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the parties hereto that the merchandise consists of rayon sports shirts exported from Japan.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the price, at the time of exportation to the United States of the merchandise undergoing appraisement, at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold, or in the absence of sales, offered for sale in the principal markets of the country of exportation, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other expenses incidental to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, was the invoiced unit values plus charges shown on the invoices for inland freight, hauling and lighterage, and storage, plus export casing & packing charges as invoiced on both invoices involved in this appeal.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the merchandise is not on the final list of articles (T.D. 54521) and is subject to the valuation procedure provided for in the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 (Public Law 927 — 84th Congress, 2nd Session).

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that this appeal may be submitted on this stipulation.

Accepting this stipulation as a statement of facts, I find and bold the export value, as tbat value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved and that such statutory values are the invoiced unit values, plus charges shown on the invoices for inland freight, hauling and lighterage, and storage, plus export casing and packing charges, as invoiced on both invoices involved in this appeal.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
# C_2018427EN.01004501.xml

| 26.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 427/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 427/45

---

Judgment of the General Court of 4 October 2018 — PD v EIB

(Case T-615/16) (1)

(Civil service - Personnel of the EIB - Psychological harassment - Total and permanent disability - Application for recognition of the occupational origin of a disease - Action brought before the closure of the procedure for recognition of the occupational origin of a disease - Inadmissibility)

(2018/C 427/56)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: PD (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: B. Maréchal, lawyer)

Defendant: European Investment Bank (EIB) (represented by: T. Gilliams and G. Faedo, acting as Agents, and by A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Re:

Action under Article 270 TFEU and Article 50a of the Statute of the Court of Justice of the European Union seeking, in essence, an order that the EIB compensate the applicant for the harm which the applicant allegedly suffered as a result of psychological harassment at the hands of his line manager and the failure on the part of the EIB to take appropriate measures to address that situation and to protect his health.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action as being inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action as being inadmissible;

| 2. | Orders PD and the European Investment Bank (EIB) to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders PD and the European Investment Bank (EIB) to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 371, 10.10.2016 (case initially registered before the European Union Civil Service Tribunal under Case No F-45/16 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1.9.2016).

---
##### 



EXHIBIT 99(b)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of Northland Cable
Television, Inc. and Subsidiary (the Company) on Form 10Q/A for the
period ended June 30, 2001 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Form 10-Q/A), I, Gary Jones,
President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;



| | (1) |  | The Form 10-Q/A fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13 (a) or (15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78(d)); and   
| | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Form 10-Q/A
fairly presents in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: November 8, 2002

| |  |     |  |                                                                    
| |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------
| |  | BY: |  | /s/ GARY S. JONES                                                  
| |  |     |  |                                                                    
| |  |     |  | Gary S. Jones
President
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
# Oct 21

# Nov 21

# Dec 21

# Jan 22

# Feb 22

# Mar 22

# Apr 22

# May 22

# Jun 22

# Jul 22

# Aug 22

# Sep 22

# image1.png

# image2.png

# image3.png

# image4.png

# image5.png

# image6.png

# image7.png

# image8.png

# image9.png

# image10.png

# image11.png

# image12.png

# image13.png

# image14.png

# image15.png

# image16.png

# image17.png

# image18.png

# image19.png

# image20.png

# image21.png

# image22.png
# C_2016296EN.01004501.xml

| 16.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 296/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 296/45

---

Action brought on 25 May 2016 — ZZ v EASA

(Case F-27/16)

(2016/C 296/56)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: S. Rodrigues and C. Bernard-Glanz. lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision transferring the applicant to a new position in the interests of the service.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the contested decision and, so far as necessary, the decision rejecting the complaint; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the contested decision and, so far as necessary, the decision rejecting the complaint;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

---
[ex31001.jpg]



[ex31002.jpg]



[ex31003.jpg]



[ex31004.jpg]



[ex31005.jpg]



[ex31006.jpg]



[ex31007.jpg]



[ex31008.jpg]



[ex31009.jpg]



[ex31010.jpg]



[ex31011.jpg]



[ex31012.jpg]



[ex31013.jpg]



[ex31014.jpg]



[ex31015.jpg]



[ex31016.jpg]



[ex31017.jpg]



[ex31018.jpg]



[ex31019.jpg]



[ex31020.jpg]



[ex31021.jpg]
No. 58471.

protests 218966-K and 222441-K (New York).

#### Robert D. McClelland and The A. W. Fenton Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

The protests were dismissed.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

**OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, Petitioner** 

**v. ROBERT J. POWELL,**  **Respondent :**  **: :**  **: :**  **: :**  **No. 1522 Disciplinary Docket No. 3**

**No. 119 DB 2009 Attorney Registration No.**  **58363 (Luzerne County)** 

O R D E R

PER CURIAM:

**AND NOW, this 23 rd**  **day of January, 2015, there having been filed with this Court**  **by Robert J. Powell his verified Statement of Resigna tion dated January 7, 2015, stating**  **that he desires to resign from the Bar of the Commonwe alth of Pennsylvania in**  **accordance with the provisions of Rule 215, Pa.R.D.E., i t is**  **ORDERED that the resignation of Robert J. Powell is accepted; he is disbarred**  **on consent from the Bar of the Commonwealth of Pennsy lvania, retroactive to August**  **31, 2009; and he shall comply with the provisions of Ru le 217, Pa.R.D.E. Respondent**  **shall pay costs, if any, to the Disciplinary Board pursuan t to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.**
# ~marcus U - lJ construction

Petitioner:

## Petition for Exemption Under Section 333 ofthe FAA Modernization and Reform Act and Part 11.81 ofthe Federal Aviation Regulations

Marcus Construction Dan O'Meara, Pilot 2580 Highway 12 East Willmar, MN 56201 February 3, 2016 Regarding Section 333 ofthe FAA Modernization and Reform Act of2012 and 14 C.F.R. Parts 11 .81, Marcus Construction hereby applies for an exemption from the listed Federal Aviation Regulations to allow commercial operation ofits small, unmanned aircraft for commercial photography and videography. All operations shall be conducted in compliance with the limitations outlined by the FAA as required by Section 333 . 1. Sections from which exemptions are sou&ht 

### a. 14 CFR Part 21, subpart H b. 14 CFR Part 91: a. 91.103(b)(2) b . 91.105 c. 91.109 d. 91.119 e. 91.121 f. 91.151 g. 91.405 h. 91.407 i. 91.409 j. 91.417 2. Relief

### SoJJ&ht 1. Marcus Construction wishes to operate small Unmanned Aircraft Systems for the purpose of producing commercial photography and videography.d . All flight operations will comply with the following: a. The manufacturers' user manuals. b. Information made available bythe FAA and other resources including (but not limited to) ht!;J,l :l/www.lmowbeforeyoufly.org and www.modelajrcraft.org c. Conducted in VMC conditions during daylight hours. d. PIC will maintain VLOS at all times. e. Pre-flight inspections (including ground control station, ifany) and safety risk assessments will be conducted priorto each flight. f. Flight altitudes will remain below 400 feet above ground level. g. Flightground speeds will not exceed SO knots. h. Notintrude into Class B, CorD airspace, or published approach, SID or STAR, or take place within 5 nautical miles ofan airport i. Not be made near persons as required in 14 CFR 91.119 and not over persons on the ground withouttheir prior permission. j. Each flight will be logged in both the PIC's logbook k. Not exceed 75% ofthe battery or fuel capacity ofthe aircraft , or 30 minutes, whichever occurs first I. Any applicable local FSDO requirements. m. All other applicable regulations concerned with the operation of ai rcraft. e . Aircraft will use FCC compliant 2.4 GHz for command & control ofthe aircraft with well

defined and tested lost link procedures. 

### Sincerely,



### Dan O'Meara Pilot , Marcus Construction
No. 58876.

protest 208865-K (New York).

#### Inter-Maritime Forwarding Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of 158 men’s woven raincoats which, when imported, had a “net weight of 553 pounds.” In view of the stipulation, the collector was directed to reliquidate the entry and assess duty under paragraph 1115 (a), as modified, supra, at *37}i*cents per pound and 25 percent ad valorem on the basis of a net weight of 553 pounds and to refund all’ duties taken in excess.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

      PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENT SET FORTH IN RULE 13A-14(B) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, AS AMENDED, AND SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF
THE UNITED STATES CODE (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350), MICHAEL D. PERRY, SENIOR VICE
PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF VITRIA TECHNOLOGY, INC., A DELAWARE
CORPORATION (THE "COMPANY") HEREBY CERTIFIES THAT, TO THE BEST OF HIS KNOWLEDGE,
AS FOLLOWS:

      The Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30,
2004, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the "PERIODIC
REPORT") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the
Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of this 6th
day of August, 2004.

                                            By:  /s/  MICHAEL D. PERRY
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 MICHAEL D. PERRY
                                                 SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF
                                                 FINANCIAL OFFICER

      A signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63
of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), has been
provided to Vitria Technology, Inc. and will be retained by Vitria Technology,
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request. This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is
not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of Vitria Technology, Inc. under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective
of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.