alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.2

    Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of the Principal Accounting Officer

I, Robert E. Dolan, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of Sunshine PCS
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date:  April 9, 2008


/s/ Robert E. Dolan
-------------------
Robert E. Dolan
Principal Accounting Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

CONSTANCE CASSEL : CIVIL ACTION

Plaintiff, :

:

vs. : NO. 05-1193:

JO ANNE B. BARNHART :

Commissioner of SOCIAL SECURITY :

ADMINISTRATION :

 :

 AND NOW, this 16 day of September, 2005, upon consideration of the parties’ Cross- th

Motions for Summary Judgment and the record in this case, and after review of the Report and

Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Jacob P. Hart dated August 18, 2005, IT IS

ORDERED as follows:

 1. The Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Jacob P. Hart

dated August 18, 2005, is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

 2. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED; and,

 3. Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN

PART. The case is REMANDED to the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration in

accordance with the fourth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), for the taking of additional testimony

from a vocational expert; the taking of medical evidence on the subject of whether the

combination of the plaintiff’s impairments equals a listed impairment; and a subsequent

re-evaluation of plaintiff’s testimony, if necessary. In all other respects, plaintiff’s Motion for

Summary Judgment is DENIED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Honorable Jan E. DuBois 

 JAN E. DUBOIS, J.

Case 2:05-cv-01193-JD Document 14 Filed 09/16/05 Page 1 of 1
# C_2018032EN.01002301.xml

| 29.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 32/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/23

---

Judgment of the General Court of 6 December 2017 — Tulliallan Burlington v EUIPO — Burlington Fashion (Burlington)

(Case T-120/16) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Figurative mark Burlington - Earlier national word marks BURLINGTON and BURLINGTON ARCADE - Earlier EU and national figurative marks BURLINGTON ARCADE - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Use in the course of trade of a sign of more than mere local significance - Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(4) of Regulation 2017/1001) - Unfair advantage taken of the distinctive character or the repute of the earlier trade marks - Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation 2017/1001)))

(2018/C 032/30)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Tulliallan Burlington Ltd (St Helier, Jersey) (represented by: A. Norris, Barrister)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Fischer, Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Burlington Fashion GmbH (Schmallenberg, Germany) (represented by: A. Parr, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 January 2016 (Case R 94/2014-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Tulliallan Burlington and Burlington Fashion.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Tulliallan Burlington Ltd to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Tulliallan Burlington Ltd to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 175, 17.5.2016.

1

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

BMG MUSIC, et al., )

)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) No. 04-CV-650

)

DOES 1-203, )

)

Defendants. )

ORDER

The motion of Public Citizen, American Civil Liberties Union, Electronic Frontier

Foundation, and ACLU of Pennsylvania for leave to file a memorandum as amici curiae is granted.

Dated: February , 2004 

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-00650-CN Document 5-4 Filed 02/23/04 Page 1 of 1
# C_2019044EN.01002101.xml

| 4.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/21

---

Judgment of the General Court of 5 December 2018 — Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharma v Commission and EMA

(Case T-329/16) (1)

((Medicinal products for human use - Orphan medicinal products - Decision withdrawing the designation of Elotuzumab as an orphan medicinal product - Decision that the designation criteria were no longer met - Marketing authorisation for the medicinal product for human use Empliciti (Elotuzumab) - Article 5(12)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 - Article 5(8) of Regulation No 141/2000 - Obligation to state reasons))

(2019/C 44/25)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharma EEIG (Uxbridge, United Kingdom) (represented by: P. Bogaert and B. Van Vooren, lawyers, and B. Kelly, Solicitor)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Sipos and K. Petersen, acting as Agents) and European Medicines Agency (represented by: N. Rampal Olmedo, M. Tovar Gomis, T. Jabłoński and S. Drosos, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU for annulment of an act adopted by the Commission removing Elotuzumab from the Community Register of orphan medicinal products for human use and/or of a possible act adopted by the Commission or the EMA determining that Elotuzumab no longer met the criteria for designation as an orphan medicinal product when the marketing authorisation was granted for the medicinal product Empliciti (Elotuzumab) under Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1999 on orphan medicinal products (OJ 2000 L 18, p. 1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to pay all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to pay all the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 314, 29.8.2016.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

 

 

FELIX D. WHITTINGTON,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

DONALD VAUGHN, et al.,

 Defendants.

 CIVIL ACTION

 NO. 02-4346

O R D E R

AND NOW, this15th day of July, 2002, it is hereby ORDERED that the attached

communications shall be filed by the Clerk.

BY THE COURT:

 

_______________________________________

MARVIN KATZ, S.J.

Case 2:02-cv-04346-MK Document 3 Filed 07/15/2002 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

 

 

FELIX D. WHITTINGTON,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

DONALD VAUGHN, et al.,

 Defendants.

 CIVIL ACTION

 NO. 02-4346

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of September, 2002, it is hereby ORDERED that the

attached communication dated August 9, 2002, shall be filed by the Clerk.

BY THE COURT:

 

_______________________________________

MARVIN KATZ, S.J.

Case 2:02-cv-04346-MK Document 7 Filed 09/03/2002 Page 1 of 1
# C_2020036EN.01002401.xml

| 3.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 36/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 36/24

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 December 2019 — Tàpias v Council

(Case T-527/16) (1)

(Civil Service - Reform of the Staff Regulations and of the CEOS that entered into force on 1 January 2014 - Regulation (EC, Euratom) No 1023/2013 - Solidarity levy applicable from 1 January 2014 - Suspension of application of the method for updating remuneration for 2013 and 2014)

(2020/C 36/28)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Margarita Tàpias (Wavre, Belgium) (represented by: L. Levi and N. Flandin, lawyers)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and R. Meyer, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Parliament (represented by: E. Taneva and M. Ecker, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision fixing the applicant’s remuneration for January 2014, as given specific expression in the salary slip for that month sent to her on 14 January 2014, which is the first salary slip to apply, with regard to the applicant, Article 65(4) and Article 66a of the Staff Regulations stemming from Article 1(44) and (46) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1023/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2013 (OJ 2013 L 287, p.15) providing, respectively, for the suspension of the application of the method for updating remuneration for 2013 and 2014 and the introduction of a solidarity levy from 1 January 2014.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Ms Margarita Tàpias to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Ms Margarita Tàpias to pay the costs;

| 3. | Orders the European Parliament to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Parliament to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 7, 12.1.2015 (case initially registered before the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union under number F-121/14 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1 September 2016).

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Science Foundation

In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces the following meeting:

*Name and Committee Code:*                     Advisory Committee for Social, Behavioral & Economic Sciences (#1171).                

*Date and Time:*                     December 14, 2023—10 a.m.-4 p.m. (Eastern); December 15, 2023—10 a.m.-3 p.m. (Eastern).                

*Place:*                     NSF, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314, NSF Room W 2210/W 2220 (In-Person). The meeting will be held in a hybrid format, with some Advisory Committee members participating in person and others                           ( print page 78796)                        participating virtually. For members of NSF and the external community, livestreaming and registration links will be available through the following page:                     *https://www.nsf.gov/​sbe/​advisory.jsp.*

*Type of Meeting:*                     Open.                

*Contact Persons:*                     Garneski, John, National Science Foundation, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314; Telephone: (703) 292-4519.                

*Purpose of Meeting:*                     To provide advice, recommendations and counsel on major goals and policies pertaining to scientific programs and activities.                

*Agenda:*                     Welcome, Introductions, Approval of Previous Advisory Committee (AC) Meeting Summary, and Preview of Agenda                 

Directorate for Social, Behavioral, and Economic Sciences (SBE) Update

Discussion on SBE and Artificial Intelligence-related research

Technology, Innovation, and Partnerships and SBE

SBE activities aligned with NSF's “Creating Opportunities Everywhere” portfolio

Dated: November 9, 2023.

Crystal Robinson,

Committee Management Officer.

[FR Doc. 2023-25278 Filed 11-15-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7555-01-P
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned officer of Global Resource Corporation (the "Company") hereby
certifies to my knowledge that the Company's annual report on Form 10-KSB for
the year ended March 31, 2006 (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission the on date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended, and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. This certification is provided solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and
shall not be deemed to be part of the Report or "filed" for any purpose
whatsoever.


Date: July 24, 2006                        Name: /s/ Mary K. Radomsky
                                                 ----------------------
                                                 Mary K. Radomsky
                                                 Title: Chief Financial Officer
77

On May 7, 1999, the Department published a Federal Register Notice of Public Workshops,

announcing a workshop for water heaters on July 23, 1999. At the workshop, the Department is

seeking discussion of the policy implications supported by the analysis. In addition, the

Department will briefly review the analysis results and any comments on the trial standard levels.

Prior to the public workshop, the Department will make publicly available the anlaytical results

that it presently plans to use in its formal decision process. the material to be presented will be

the basis for the technical Support Document for the Notice of Proposed Rulemakings. DOE

staff and contractors are preparing the material.

We have posted the analyses for water heaters at

hhtp://www.eren.doe.gov/buildings/codes_standards/applbrf/waterheater. Please continue

to check this site for additional postings.

The July 23 workshop format will be a summary of the analytical results that will have been

publicly available prior to the workshop, followed by a summary discussion of the comments

received prior to the workshop. A senior DOE official also will facilitate a discussion on which

standard levels participants at the workshop believe can be supported by the analyses.

The Department will conduct this workshop prior to our selection of proposed revisions to the

energy efficiency standards for water heaters and the Department will consider output from the

workshop in the development of its proposal.

Following the workshop, the Department will provide an additional comment period, during

which interested particies will have an opportunity to comment on the proceedings at the

workshop, as well as on any aspect of the rulemaking proceedings, including what policy

implications the commenters might draw from the analyses.

The following table lists the relevant dates.

Water Heaters

Comments Due on web materials July 6, 1999

Workshop July 23, 1999

Comments Due on workshop August 3, 1999

Please submit your written comments by e-mail to Terr.LogeeZee.doe.gov and/or to

Brenda.Edwards-Jones(r.ee.doe.gov Please send one signed copy to: U.S. Department of

Energy, Attn: Brenda Edwards-Jones, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable energy, EE43, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20585, (202) 586-2945. Please provide

10 copies of supporting documentation not attached to the e-mail or delivered electronically.

EE-RM-97-900 COMMENT 77A
No. 49076.

#### Protest 758537-G of Philip Lien (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The evidence presented at the trial showmd that certain of the items in question consist of hats similar to those involved in *Caradine*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 69, C. D. 664), the record in which case was admitted in evidence herein. In accordance therewith certain of the hats in question were held dutiable at only 25 percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (5) as claimed.
# C_2018022EN.01003502.xml

| 22.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/35

---

Judgment of the General Court of 30 November 2017 — FTI Touristik v EUIPO — Prantner and Giersch (FI)

(Case T-475/16) (1)

1

((European Union trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark FI - Prior EU figurative mark fly.de - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)))

(2018/C 022/48)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: FTI Touristik GmbH (Munich, Germany) (represented by: A. Parr, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Harald Prantner (Hamburg, Germany) and Daniel Giersch (Monaco, Monaco) (represented by: S. Eble and Y.-A. Wolff, lawyers)

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 16 June 2016 (Case R 480/2015-5) concerning opposition proceedings between FTI Touristik and Messrs Prantner and Giersch.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders FTI Touristik GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders FTI Touristik GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 383, 17.10.2016.

1

---
No. 51623.

#### Petition 6420-R of Rice-Stix Dry Goods Co. (St. Louis).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It appeared from the testimony that it was the invariable practice of the petitioner to submit all its invoices to the appraiser to ascertain whether the-prices shown thereon represented what the latter understood to constitute the true values of the merchandise; that inasmuch as the appraiser knew of no change in the market value of the merchandise, he appraised the same at the invoice prices; and that 'it was not until some time after said appraisement that it was discovered there was a new price list showing higher values. From an examination of the record and consideration of all the facts involved, the court was satisfied as to the good faith of petitioner. It was held that the entry of the merchandise at a less value than that returned upon final appraisement was without any intention to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the case or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore granted.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>           5
<LEGEND>
                    The Schedule contains summary financial
                    information extracted from the financial
                    statements for World Monitor Trust--Series B
                    and is qualified in its entirety by reference
                    to such financial statements
</LEGEND>

<RESTATED>
<CIK>               1051823
<NAME>              World Monitor Trust--Series B
<MULTIPLIER>        1

<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               Dec-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  Jan-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    Sep-24-1999
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-Mos

<CASH>                          23,355,210

<SECURITIES>                    273,712

<RECEIVABLES>                   80,647

<ALLOWANCES>                    0

<INVENTORY>                     0

<CURRENT-ASSETS>                23,709,569

<PP&E>                          0

<DEPRECIATION>                  0

<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  23,709,569

<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>           285,739

<BONDS>                         0

<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0

<PREFERRED>                     0

<COMMON>                        0

<OTHER-SE>                      23,423,830

<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    23,709,569

<SALES>                         0

<TOTAL-REVENUES>                4,191,250

<CGS>                           0

<TOTAL-COSTS>                   0

<OTHER-EXPENSES>                1,729,979

<LOSS-PROVISION>                0

<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              0

<INCOME-PRETAX>                 0

<INCOME-TAX>                    0

<INCOME-CONTINUING>             0

<DISCONTINUED>                  0

<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0

<CHANGES>                       0

<NET-INCOME>                    2,461,271

<EPS-BASIC>                   16.85

<EPS-DILUTED>                   0

</TABLE>