alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Of the District of Puerto Rico, sitting by designation. * Not for P ubl ication in West's Fe deral Reporter 

# U nit edStates C ou rt o f App eal s

For th e Firs t C ircu it

No. 06-2363 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appellant,
v . HARRY GUZMAN, Defendant, Appellee.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Joseph L. Tauro, U.S. District Judge]
Before Lipez, Circuit Judge, Selya, Senior Circuit Judge, and Delgado-Colón, District Judge. * Robert E. Richardson, Assistant United States Attorney, with whom Michael J. Sullivan, United States Attorney, was on brief, for appellant. Judith H. Mizner, Federal Defender Office, with whom David A. Ruhnke and Ruhnke & Barrett were on brief, for appellee.
September 27, 2007-2- Per Curiam. The district court's a l l o wance of the defendant's motion in limine was not an abuse of discretion and, a fortiori, the court's denial of the ensuing motio n f or reconsideration was also within its discretion. Consequently, we affirm the rulings from which the government has appealed. The district court may, if circumstances warrant and if the court so elects, revisit the in limine ruling during the trial. See, e.g., United States v. Marino, 200 F.3d 6, 11 (1st Cir. 1999) (explaining that "rulings on motions in limine normally are c o n s idered provisional, in the sense that the trial court may revisit its pretrial evidentiary rulings at retrial when an evidentiary proffer may be more accurately assessed in the context of . . . other evidence"). In all events, we need go no further.

Affirmed.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 USC, SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the annual report of Bio Solutions  Manufacturing,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended  October 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Krish V. Reddy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Sec. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act
of 2002, that:

     (a) The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Sections 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (b) Information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Dated: February 11, 2005
                                 /s/ Krish V. Reddy
                                 ---------------------------------
                                 By: Krish V. Reddy
                                 Its: Chief Executive Officer





-----------------------

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided  to Bio  Solutions  Manufacturing,  Inc.  and will be  retained  by Bio
Solutions  Manufacturing,  Inc.  and  furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.
No. 62981.

#### Eberling & Reuss Co. *v.*United States,

protests 295346-K, etc. (Philadelphia).

*354Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of figures similar in all material respects to those passed upon in *Win. S. Pitcairn Corp.*v. *United States*(39 C.C.P.A. 15, C.A.D. 458), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           4,388
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,329
<ALLOWANCES>                                       369
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                10,734
<PP&E>                                         161,517
<DEPRECIATION>                                  34,501
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 143,656
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           37,104
<BONDS>                                        106,689
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            27
<OTHER-SE>                                    (15,709)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   143,656
<SALES>                                         15,407
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                15,797
<CGS>                                            6,844
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,782
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,291
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (7,957)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (2,715)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (5,242)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (5,242)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (1.92)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:  February 8, 2008
    By:
    /s/ C. S. LiollioC. S. LiollioPresident and
Chief Executive Officer 35
# MTS Cover

# Introduction

# Table 1

# Table 2

# Figure 1

# Figure 2

# Figure 3

# Figure 4

# Table 3

# Table 4

# Table 5

# Table 6

# Table 6A

# Table 6B

# Table 6C

# Table 6D

# Table 6E

# Table 7

# Table 8

# Table 9

# Explanatory Notes

# MTS Scheduled Release

# image1.jpeg

# image2.jpeg

# image3.jpeg

# image4.jpeg
# C_2016200EN.01002601.xml

| 6.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 200/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 200/26

---

Order of the President of the General Court of 22 April 2016 — Le Pen v Parliament

(Case T-140/16 R)

((Interim measures - Member of the European Parliament - Recovery of allowances paid by way of reimbursement of parliamentary assistance expenses - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - No urgency))

(2016/C 200/37)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Jean-Marie Le Pen (Saint-Cloud, France) (represented by: M. Ceccaldi and J.-P. Le Moigne, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: G. Corstens and S. Seyr, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application based on Articles 278 and 279 TFEU, seeking the suspension of the operation of the decision of the Secretary-General of the Parliament of 29 January 2016 ordering the recovery from the applicant of a sum of 320 026,23 euros, and of debit note No 2016-195 of 4 February 2016 adopted pursuant to that decision.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The application for interim measures is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The application for interim measures is dismissed.

| 2. | The costs are reserved. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The costs are reserved.

---
Exhibit
10.1


 





AMENDMENT
TO PROMISSORY NOTE


 


This
Amendment to Promissory Note (this “Amendment”) is effective as of _______________, 2021 and is by and between
____________________ (“Maker”) and ____________________ (“Holder”). Capitalized terms not
otherwise defined herein have the meanings given to them in the Note (as defined below).


WHEREAS,
Maker executed a Promissory Note dated __________, 20___, payable to Holder in the original principal amount of $__________ (the
“Note”).


WHEREAS,
Maker and Holder now wish to amend the Note as set forth herein.


NOW
THEREFORE, in consideration of the agreements, promises, covenants, and provisions contained in this Amendment, the parties agree
as follows:


1.                  
Amendment. The Maturity Date is hereby extended, without penalty, to June 30, 2021.


2.                  
No Default. Holder acknowledges that no Event of Default under the Note has occurred.


3.                  
Note Otherwise Remains In Effect. This Amendment amends the specific terms and conditions of the Note set forth herein.
All other provisions of the Note remain and continue in full force and effect.


4.                  
Modification or Waiver of Amendment. No modification or waiver of this Amendment will be valid unless in a writing signed
by all of the parties.


5.                  
Counterparts. This Amendment may be executed in two or more counterparts, each of which will be deemed an original and
all of which together will constitute one and the same instrument.


6.                  
No Rule of Strict Construction. The language of this Amendment has been approved by all of the parties and no rule of strict
construction will be applied against any party.


7.                  
Governing Law. This Amendment will be construed in accordance with and any dispute or controversy arising from any breach
or asserted breach of this Amendment will be governed by the laws of the State of Arizona.





	 	MAKER:
	 	 
	 	Name:	 
	 	 	 
	 	HOLDER:

                                                                      

	 	 
	 	Name:
EXHIBIT 13.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS

ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Alto Palermo Sociedad
Anónima (the company) for the year ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Gabriel Blasi, as Chief Financial Officer of the company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------











|                                    |  | 
|----------------------------------- |  | 
|/s/ Gabriel Blasi By: Gabriel
Blasi |  | 
|Chief Financial Officer             |  | 
|                                    | 
|December 28, 2006                   |  | 

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002 and shall not, except as to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this

opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS For the Fifth Circuit

No. 02-30141 Summary Calendar

MICHAEL W. PALMER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

VERSUS

RICHARD DANZIG, Secretary of the Navy,

Appeal from the United States District Court For the Eastern District of Louisiana

CV 99-2675-J

August 16, 2002

Before DAVIS, WIENER and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

After a careful review of the record and the b riefs of the

parties, we are persuaded that the district court correctly granted

summary judgment in favor of the defendant.

The judgment of the district court is therefore affirmed

essentially for the re asons stated in the magistrate judge’s2

thorough November 27, 2001 Order.

AFFIRMED.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 1350 OF
CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE
  (i)
    
    the Quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September
30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(ii)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Melinda S. UrionMelinda S. UrionExecutive Vice President,Chief Financial Officer and TreasurerAmerUs Group Co.
Appeal Reinstated, Motion Granted, Appeal Dismissed, and Memorandum

Opinion filed April 30, 2019 .

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14- 18 -00956- CV LOWELL VERMILLION, Appellant

V. EPIC LIFT SYSTEMS, L LC , Appellee On Appeal from the 113th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2018-63586

MEMORANDUM OPINION This is an interlocutory appeal from a temporary injunction order signed October 8, 2018. We abated the appeal on January 29, 2019, for the parties to pursue settlement. On April 17, 2019, appellant filed an unopposed motion to dismiss the appeal pursuant to the terms of the parties’ settlement agreement

. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1. We reinstate the appeal, grant the motion, and dismiss the appeal. PER CURIAM Panel Consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jewell and Bourliot.
S |
CRiope's Ban atlas

August 25, 1999

Cynthia L. Johnson

Director, Cash Mgmt Policy & Planning Div.
Financial Management Service, Room 420
401 14” Street, SW

Washington, D.C. 20227

Re: Response to proposed amendment to TT&L rate of interest
Dear Ms. Johnson:

We began participation in the TT&L Investment Program in order to achieve a spread on
funds borrowed versus funds invested. When the interest rate paid in the program is 25
basis points less than the Fed Funds rate, we are able to achieve the 25 basis point spread
on our note balances. Without the spread, our participation would probably not be
continued.

However, there would be advantages to a program whereby the note balances would have
a guaranteed term. Our interest in that program would be dependent on the rate of
interest, the length of the term, ceilings, etc.

Our primary objective is to participate in borrowing and lending activities that ultimately
profit our institution. If that objective is not achieved, other activities are merely

overhead, and where possible, we strive to eliminate unnecessary overhead activities.

We hope this reply is responsive to your request. We will be happy to answer any
questions you may have.

Sincerel;

Tommy B. Wéssinger
Chairman and CEO
TBW/jc
AIKEN OFFICE NO! OPERATIONS CENTER
1715 Wh 106 Park Ave, SW
Aiken, N 2984] Aiken, SC 29801
Tel (803) 641-BANK Tel (803) 819-3030 Tel (803) 641.0142
Fax (803) 641-6893 Fax (803) 819-0231 Fax (803) 641-7555

Post Office Box 313, Aiken, SC 29802
##### 



Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of CSK Auto Corporation (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the period ending November 3, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Maynard L. Jenkins, hereby certify in my capacity as Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, for purposes of 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:



|(1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                       
|--- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/s/ Maynard L. Jenkins

Maynard L. Jenkins
Chief Executive Officer
December 18, 2002
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**Certification Pursuant to**

**18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

**As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AXT, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Morris S. Young, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), that, to the best of myknowledge:

 

(1)          The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

 

(2)          The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: May 17, 2010 | By:    | /s/ MORRIS S. YOUNG                                                           |
|--------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                     |   | Morris S. Young

*Chief  Executive Officer*

*(Principal  Executive Officer)* |

 

----
# C_2018166EN.01001401.xml

| 14.5.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 166/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.5.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 166/14

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 22 March 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Nürtingen — Germany) — Criminal proceedings against Faiz Rasool

(Case C-568/16) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Payment services - Directive 2007/64/EC - Article 3(e) and (o) - Article 4(3) - Annex - Point 2 - Scope - Operation of multifunctional terminals enabling cash withdrawals in gaming arcades - Consistency of the practice of the national authorities in bringing prosecutions - Confiscation of sums obtained by means of an unlawful activity - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Article 17))

(2018/C 166/17)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Amtsgericht Nürtingen

Party to the main proceedings

Party to the main proceedings

Faiz Rasool

Other party to the proceedings: Rasool Entertainment GmbH

Other party to the proceedings:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 4(3) of Directive 2007/64/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 November 2007 on payment services in the internal market amending Directives 97/7/EC, 2002/65/EC, 2005/60/EC and 2006/48/EC and repealing Directive 97/5/EC, read in conjunction with point 2 of the annex to the directive, must be interpreted as meaning that a cash withdrawal service offered by a gaming arcade operator to his customers by means of multifunctional terminals in those arcades is not a ‘payment service’ within the meaning of that directive, where the operator does not carry out any operation on those customers’ payment accounts and the activities he performs on that occasion are confined to making the terminals available and loading them with cash.

---

(1)  OJ C 22, 23.1.2017.

1

---
**Exhibit 31.2**CERTIFICATIONI, Charles P. Huffman, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of EnergySouth, Inc. (the “Registrant”);2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this quarterly report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterlyreport;4. The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) and have:(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this quarterly report is being prepared;(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisquarterly report based on such evaluation; and(c) Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the Registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;5. The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the Registrant’s board of directors:(a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.        Date: August 9, 2005 /s/  Charles P. Huffman   Charles P. Huffman   Senior Vice President and
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

 

:

ANTHONY BARBEE, : CIVIL ACTION

:

Plaintiff, :

:

v. : No. 04-4063

:

SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA :

TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, :

:

Defendant. :

 :

O R D E R

 

AND NOW, this 13th day of February, 2006, upon consideration of Defendant’s “Motion

for Sanctions Against the Plaintiff, Anthony Barbee, for his Failure to Pay Sanctions Previously

Ordered by the Court” (Doc. No. 25), and Plaintiff’s Response thereto, it is hereby ORDERED

that Defendant’s Motion is DENIED.

BY THE COURT:

 /s/ 

Robert F. Kelly, Sr. J. 

Case 2:04-cv-04063-RK Document 27 Filed 02/14/06 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:05-cv-00112-PBT Document 16 Filed 02/17/05 Page 1 of 1
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed March 29, 2023.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D23-118

Lower Tribunal No. F93-29489A, F93-26947A, and F93-25895C

________________

Rondy Alexis Philo,

Appellant,

vs.

The State of Florida,

Appellee.

An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from 

the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Cristina Miranda, Judge.

Law Office of Peter Lombardo, and Peter Lombardo (Bradenton), for 

appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, for appellee.

Before FERNANDEZ, C.J., and HENDON, and GORDO, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.