alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 31.1

           Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

I, David S. Ahl, certify that:

1.  I  have  reviewed  this  Annual  Report  on  Form  10-KSB  of  Sunshine  PCS
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

         (a) Designed such disclosure  controls and  procedures,  or caused such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

         (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and  procedures  and  presented  in  this  report  our  conclusions   about  the
effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the  registrant's  internal
control over financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's  fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual  report)  that  has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely  to
materially affect, the registrant's  internal control over financial  reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's  auditors  and the audit  committee  of the  registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

         (a) All significant  deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal  control over financial  reporting which are reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

         (b) Any fraud,  whether or not material,  that  involves  management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting.

Date:  March 26, 2008


/s/ David S. Ahl
----------------
David S. Ahl
Chief Executive Officer
# C_2016364EN.01004102.xml

| 3.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 364/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 364/41

---

Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 21 July 2016 —  WQ (*1) v Parliament

(Case F-1/16) (1)

((Civil service - Officials - Certification procedure - 2014 period - Applicant not included on the list of officials selected to participate in the training programme - Article 45a of the Staff Regulations))

(2016/C 364/51)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: WQ (*1) (represented by: S. Orlandi and T. Martin, lawyers)

Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: D. Nessaf and M. Ecker, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application for annulment of the Parliament’s decision not to include the applicant’s name on the list of officials selected to participate in the training programme for the 2014 certification exercise.

Operative part of the judgment

The Tribunal:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders  WQ (*1) to bear his own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Parliament. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders  WQ (*1) to bear his own costs and pay the costs incurred by the European Parliament.

---

(*1)  Information erased or replaced within the framework of protection of personal data and/or confidentiality.

(1)  OJ C 111, 29.3.2016, p. 45.

---
**Exhibit 15.2**

**Consent of Independent Registered Certified Public Accounting Firm**

TracFone Wireless, Inc. 

Miami, Florida 

We hereby consent to the incorporation byreference in the Registration Statement on Form F-3 (No. 333-137695) of América Móvil, S.A.B. de C.V. (“América Móvil”) and Radiomóvil Dipsa, S.A. de C.V. of our report dated February 1, 2008,relating to the consolidated financial statements of TracFone Wireless, Inc., appearing in the Annual Report (Form 20-F) of América Móvil for the year ended December 31, 2007. 

/s/ BDO Seidman, LLP 

Miami, Florida 

June 4, 2008
Before the First Division,

April 4, 1955

No. 58907.

protests 481362-G, etc. (New York).

#### Herzig & Hart, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of lambskin plates the same in all material respects as those the subject of *A. S. Gold & Bro., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 120, C. D. 1643), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Ford, J., concurred.

Mollison, J.,

dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1643, *supra.*
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 176-2 Filed 10/26/2006 Page 1 of 1
No. 57942.

protests 978267-G and 978701-G (New York).

#### Dyson Shipping Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “A” consist of goatskins similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Winograd Bros., Inc.*(32 C. C. P. A. 153, C. A. D. 302), and that the items marked “B” consist of kidskin plates the same as those involved in *Kung Chen Fur Corpn.*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Ford, J., concurred.

Mollison, J., dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1480, *supra,*only so far as the items marked “B” are concerned.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JENNIFER L. CHRISTOPHERSON,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 12-17219

D.C. No. 2:09-cv-01005-JAT

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

James A. Teilborg, Senior District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 6, 2015** 

San Francisco, California

Before: TALLMAN and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges, and DEARIE, Senior

District Judge.*** 

FILED

FEB 12 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

 *** The Honorable Raymond J. Dearie, Senior District Judge for the U.S.

District Court for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation.
Appellant Jennifer J. Christopherson (Christopherson) appeals the district

court’s remand to the Administrative Law Judge of her social security disability

benefits application for further proceedings rather than an immediate award of

benefits. Reviewing for an abuse of discretion, see Treichler v. Comm’r of Social

Security Admin., No. 12-35944, 2014 WL 7332774, at *5 (9th Cir. Dec. 24, 2014),

we affirm. 

Because there are unanswered questions about the extent of

Christopherson’s impairment, and divergent opinions on Christopherson’s ability

to work, the district court did not abuse its discretion in remanding the case for

further proceedings. See id. at *11 (articulating that a case involving unresolved

factual conflicts and ambiguities should be remanded for further proceedings).

AFFIRMED.

2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. 

ASBESTOS PERSONAL INJURY 

SETTLEMENT TRUST, 

 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, 

 

 Defendant. 

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Civil Action No. 02-CV-4360 

ORDER

AND NOW, this ______ day of _________________________, 2007, upon 

consideration of the Uncontested Emergency Motion for a Rule 16(b) Scheduling Conference, it 

is hereby: 

ORDERED and DECREED that a Rule 16(b) scheduling conference is scheduled in this 

matter for the ______ day of _________________________, 2007 at ___:____ __.m. 

BY THE COURT: 

 Surrick, J. 

Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 62-2 Filed 09/27/2007 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 21-6535

ERIC ADAM GREEN,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

GARY MCFADDEN, Mecklenburg County Sheriff; MECKLENBURG SHERIFF 

DEPARTMENT; MICHAEL A KOLB, Attorney at Law; W. ROBERT BELL, 

Senior Judge,

 Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at 

Charlotte. Martin K. Reidinger, Chief District Judge. (3:21-cv-00025-MR)

Submitted: October 28, 2021 Decided: November 3, 2021

Before DIAZ and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges, and KEENAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Eric Adam Green, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Eric Adam Green appeals the district court’s order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 

complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915A, 1915(e). We have reviewed the record and 

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 

Green v. McFadden, No. 3:21-cv-00025-MR (W.D.N.C. Mar. 16, 2021). We dispense 

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 60425.

protest 269804-K (New York).

#### Atalanta Trading Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

An examination of the official record failing to disclose any reason for disturbing the presumptively correct classification of the merchandise made by the collector, the protest was overruled.
---

CERTIFICATIONS

The undersigned, Kevin Kortje, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | the annual report on Form 20-F/A of Qwick Media Inc. for
      the year ended December 31, 2013 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Qwick Media Inc.                                                                 



Dated: September 19, 2014

| | /s/
      Kevin Kortje          
| | --------------------------------
| | Kevin Kortje                    
| | Chief Financial Officer         
| | (Principal Financial Officer and
| | Principal Accounting Officer)   

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Qwick Media Inc.
and will be retained by Qwick Media Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

: CIVIL ACTION NOS.

:

WEYANT : 02-3886

GOODMAN : 02-3910

MARRA, et al. : 02-3913

FREDERICKSEN : 02-3948

FRANCIS : 02-3967

SPACCAMONTI : 02-3971

STETZENBACK : 02-3978

CLEMENT, et al. : 02-4031

CLEMENT, et al. : 02-4032

HARCOURT, et al. : 02-4128

WAGE, et al. : 02-4169

NUNNERY, et al. : 02-4173

JOHNSON, et al. : 02-4216

BLAIR, et al. : 02-4223

CASTO, et al. : 02-4228

ZAMBRANO, et al. : 02-4276

FOSS, et al. : 02-4286

BURKE-SHERMAN, et al. : 02-4366

:

VS. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION, et al. :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of July, 2002, the Court having been previously

advised that the above action cannot proceed to trial and disposition because of the following

reason:

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending disposition of a related

action.

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending determination of

arbitration proceedings.

[ ] - Interlocutory appeal filed.

[ X ] - Other: Case is placed into suspense pending receipt of the Case

Transfer Order from the Judicial Panel on Multi District Litigation

transferring the case to the District of Minnesota.

Case 2:02-cv-04276-RB Document 2 Filed 07/10/2002 Page 1 of 2
It is

ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this action closed for statistical purposes and

place the matter in the Civil Suspense File, and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction; and that the case be

restored to the trial docket when the action is in a status so that it may proceed to final

disposition; this order shall not prejudice the rights of the parties to this litigation.

BY THE COURT:

________________________________________

Ronald L. Buckwalter, Judge

Case 2:02-cv-04276-RB Document 2 Filed 07/10/2002 Page 2 of 2
February 13, 1946

No. 50894.

C. D. 973.

#### Protest 105661-K of Sawelson Wholesale Co.

Plaintiff's application for rehearing denied, as follows:

Ekwall, Judge:

This is a motion for rehearing filed on behalf of the plaintiff from our decision reported as 15 Cust. Ct. 202, C. D. 973, wherein it was held in effect that rum, the product of Cuba, exported from that country subsequent to the effective date of the supplemental Cuban Trade Agreement (54 Stat. 1997) was subject, upon its importation into this country, to an internal revenue tax at $3 per proof gallon under the provisions of section 600 (a) (4), Revenue Act of 1918 (40 Stat. 1057), as amended by title II, section 213, Revenue Act of 1940 (54 Stat. 516 at 524), rather than at the rate in effect at the time of the effective date of the Haitian Trade Agreement (49 Stat. 3737).

The ground for the motion as stated in plaintiff’s memorandum is that the court failed to pass upon one of the issues presented, viz, that no conflict was created by the statute of 1938 and the Haitian Trade Agreement, and that as said issue was not presented to the court in *United States*v. *Rathjen Brothers,*31 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 70, C. A. D. 250, that case was not *stare decisis*of the issues in the in*227stant case. The argument on this phase of the case was fully and ably presented in the brief of counsel for the plaintiff and was considered and weighed by this court. However, it was conceded on behalf of the plaintiff that an amended act is usually construed, insofar as subsequent occurrences are concerned, as if it had been originally enacted in the amended form. It was so held in *United States*v. *La Franca,*282 U. S. 568, at 571/2; *Blair*v. *City of Chicago,*201 U. S. 400 at 475; *Pennsylvania Co.*v. *United States,*236 U. S. 351, 362. Plaintiff’s contention as set forth in the brief, was that the holdings of the cases cited had no application here when by an intervening act or event rights have been created which would be violated if the amendment were considered as an enactment of the original statute upon the date of amendment. It is the opinion of the court and we so hold that any rights that plaintiff may have had were such as were acquired subsequent to the Revenue Act of 1938 when this merchandise was withdrawn from warehouse, for not until then did any right of action accrue. Certainly plaintiff had no right to the maintenance of an existing rate of duty. *Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co.*v. *United States,*288 U. S. 294, 318; *United States*v. *George S. Bush & Co., Inc.,*310 U. S. 371, 379.

The motion for rehearing is denied.
No. 66264.

#### John L. Westland & Son, Inc., a/c John Beccaria et al. *v.*United States,

protests 58/25732, etc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Oliver, O. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of opal glass tiles or tiling the same as those the subject of Abstract 65376, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Exhibit 32.1

                Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
                       As Adopted Pursuant To Section 906
                        Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002

In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of GSV, Inc. (the  "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period ending  September 30, 2006 (the  "Report"),  I, Gilad Gat,
Chief  Executive  Officer and Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1) The Report fully complies with the  requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2) The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all material
respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.

                                    By: /s/ Gilad Gat
                                        -------------
                                        Gilad Gat
                                        Chief Executive Officer
                                        Chief Financial Officer
                                        November 13, 2006
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

____________________________________ 

 ) 

BARBARA A. DWYER, ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiff ) CIVIL ACTION 

 ) 

 v. ) NO: 02-CV-4353 

 ) 

INTEGRATED TECHNOLOGIES, INC. ) 

 ) 

 Defendant ) 

____________________________________) 

DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS 

AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR IMPROPER VENUE

 Defendant ITEQ-Integrated Technologies, Inc. (“ITEQ”), improperly named as 

"Integrated Technologies, Inc." in the Amended Complaint, hereby moves to dismiss the 

Amended Complaint for Improper Venue pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1406 and 42 U.S.C. § 2000e5(f). In support of this motion, as set forth more fully in the attached Memorandum of Points 

and Authorities, Defendant moves to dismiss the Amended Complaint in this case because 

neither the alleged unlawful employment practices, the relevant employment records, nor the 

location Plaintiff would have worked but for the alleged unlawful employment practices, is in the 

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.1 In the alternative, Defendant moves to transfer the case to the 

District of Maryland. 

 

 

1

 On or about September 30, 2002, ITEQ moved to dismiss the Plaintiff’s initial complaint for lack of venue. 

Following a telephone conference convened by Judge Weiner to discuss the motion, Judge Weiner issued an Order 

dated October 15, 2002 denying the motion without prejudice and granting the Defendant the right to renew the 

motion at the close of discovery. Subsequent to Judge Weiner’s Order, Plaintiff served Defendant with an Amended 

Complaint. By this motion, Defendant again moves to dismiss for lack of venue in order to preserve its rights in this 

regard. 

Case 2:02-cv-04353-CRW Document 7 Filed 11/01/2002 Page 1 of 2
 

 WHEREFORE, Defendant respectfully requests that this Court grant its motion and 

dismiss the Amended Complaint filed in this case. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

 BAZELON LESS FELDMAN, P.C. 

 BY: _____________________________ 

 Paul B. Bech 

 I.D. No. 59850 

 1515 Market Street, 7th Floor 

 Philadelphia, PA 19102 

 Attorneys for Defendant 

 Integrated Technologies, Inc. 

OF COUNSEL: 

Andrew P. Hallowell 

PILIERO, MAZZA & PARGAMENT, PLLC 

888 17th Street, N.W., Suite 1100 

Washington, D.C. 20006 

(202) 857-1000 

DATED: December 3, 2002 

Case 2:02-cv-04353-CRW Document 7 Filed 11/01/2002 Page 2 of 2
No. 57956.

protest 214785-K (New York).

#### Empire Liquor Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the merchandise, issues, and facts herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that four cartons of Gold Label Rum reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, were not in fact received by the importer. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited it was held that duty and internal revenue tax are not assessable upon such portions of the merchandise as were reported by the inspector as manifested, not found. The protest was sustained to this extent.
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**Statement
      of Chief Financial Officer Furnished**


**Pursuant
      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





The
      undersigned, Gary F. Hoskins, is the Chief Financial Officer of Citizens South
      Banking Corporation (the “Company”).





This
      statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the Company of
      the
      Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2008
      (the “Report”).





By
      execution of this statement, I certify that to the best of my
      knowledge:





A)
            the
                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d))
                and





B)
            the
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
                Company
                as of the dates and for the periods covered by the
                Report.








November
                10, 2008
            
            /s/
                Gary F. HoskinsDated
            
            Gary
                F. HoskinsChief
                Financial Officer





This
      statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that
      this
      statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with
      the
      Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that this statement
      be
      deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
      amended.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to Citizens South Banking Corporation and will be retained
      by Citizens South Banking Corporation and furnished to the Securities
      and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.