alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED July 7, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-60605 Summary Calendar

ROCKIE D. PICKENS, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus VIMAL POWELL, Inmate Legal Assistance Program Technician, in his individual capacity, Defendant-Appellee.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi

USDC No. 4:03-CV-427

-------------------- Before Barksdale, Stewart, and Clement, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Rockie D. Pickens, Mississippi inmate # 71454, seeks to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal from the district court’s dismissal of his civil rights complaint under FED . R. C IV . P. 4(m) for failure to serve the defendant. Pickens argues that he was entitled to rely on the United States Marshal’s Service to serve Powell and that it failed to effect service by not serving Powell personally at his home address.No. 05-60605 -2- By moving for leave to proceed IFP, Pickens is challenging the district court’s certification that his appeal was not taken in good faith. See Baugh v. Taylor , 117 F.3d 197, 202 (5th Cir. 1997); 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); FED . R. APP . P. 24(a)(3). Because Pickens was IFP, he was entitled to rely on the Marshal’s Service to effect service of his complaint on Powell. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(c); FED . R. C IV . P. 4(c)(2); Rochon v. Dawson , 828 F.2d 1107, 1110 (5th Cir. 1987). If the Marshal’s Service attempted to serve Powell by certified mail only and not personally, the Marshal’s Service improperly performed its duty, and the district court abused its discretion when it dismissed Pickens’s suit.
See Lindsey v. United States R.R. Retirement Bd. , 101 F.3d 444, 447 (5th Cir. 1996); FED . R. C IV . P. 4(e); M ISS . R. C IV . P. 4(c)(5); Triple C Transp., Inc. v. Dickens , 870 So. 2d 1195, 1198-99 (Ms. 2004). IT IS ORDERED that Pickens’s motion to proceed IFP is GRANTED. The district court’s certification decision is VACATED, and the case is REMANDED for the district court to identify evidence that the Marshal’s Service attempted to serve Powell personally. If the district court is unable to identify such evidence, it should order the United States Marshal’s Service or other appropriate person under FED . R. C IV . P. 4(e) to serve Pickens’s complaint on Powell personally. IFP GRANTED; VACATED AND REMANDED.
# C_2017269EN.01002101.xml

| 14.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/21

---

Order of the General Court of 20 June 2017 — CSL Behring v EUIPO — Vivatrex (Vivatrex)

(Case T-346/16) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark Vivatrex - Revocation of the earlier EU trade mark - No need to adjudicate))

(2017/C 269/30)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: CSL Behring AG (Berne, Switzerland) (represented by: M. Best, U. Pfleghar and S. Schäffner, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Lukošiūtė, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Vivatrex GmbH (Aachen, Germany) (represented by: F. Stangl, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 27 April 2016 (Joined Cases R 1263/2015-4 and R 1221/2015-4), relating to opposition proceedings between CSL Behring and Vivatrex.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
| --- | --- |

1.

There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action.

| 2. | Each party is to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Each party is to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 305, 22.8.2016.

1

---
U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE. 

AVIATION 

West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140 

Washington, DC 20590 

Attn: Vicky Dunne 

Subject: Petition for Exemption 

5/23/2013 

This letter is to formally request a Petition for Exemption" to combine the drug programs which Summit Aviation 

currently has into one program. We currently operate separate FAA DOT drug programs, required for the following 

purposes: 

• Part 135 operation and 135 maintenance (CONN094C) 

• FAA Letter of Authorization (LOA) to allow scenic flights 

I am requesting these programs be combined into one program to improve the efficiency and accuracy of the drug 

programs. By combining the programs there is less chance of error with combined records, this will in additionally 

improve the efficiency of the DOT/FAA audit of our program. Granting this exemption will not affect public safety 

as it will not alter the required drug testing for either purpose (Part 135 or the LOA). 

Dtl: 

Summit Aviation LLC- Owner 

2440 SW Aviation Street 

Bentonville, AR 72712 

davepowell@iflysummit.com 

Cessna 

~ Pilot Center 

Bentonville 

"Meeting the Needs of General Aviation in NW Arkansas" 

Bentonville Airport (KVBT) - 2440 SW Aviation St, Bentonville, AR 72712 479-254-0817 

Flight School - 479-273-3590 • Service Center- 479-464-0987 

Springdale Airport (KASG)- 802Airport Rd, Springdale, AR 72764 479-751-4462 

Flight School- 479-725-0642 

www.IFLYsummit.com 

Cessna 

~ Service Center 

BentonvJlle
Case 2:04-cr-00732-JS Document 414 Filed 07/15/11 Page 1 of 7
Case 2:04-cr-00732-JS Document 414 Filed 07/15/11 Page 2 of 7
Case 2:04-cr-00732-JS Document 414 Filed 07/15/11 Page 3 of 7
Case 2:04-cr-00732-JS Document 414 Filed 07/15/11 Page 4 of 7
Case 2:04-cr-00732-JS Document 414 Filed 07/15/11 Page 5 of 7
Case 2:04-cr-00732-JS Document 414 Filed 07/15/11 Page 6 of 7
Case 2:04-cr-00732-JS Document 414 Filed 07/15/11 Page 7 of 7
##### 



Exhibit 32-14 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Detroit Edison Securitization Funding LLC
(the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Daniel G. Brudzynski, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to
the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1)
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated: March 15, 2005
    
    /s/ DANIEL G. BRUDZYNSKIDaniel G. BrudzynskiControllerThe Detroit Edison Securitization Funding LLC
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SERVICE
P.O. BOX 24700
Oakland, CA 94623

Date: april 29, 2013

TO: Agencies Serviced by the San Francisco Financial Center (SFC)

SUBJECT: Regional Financial Center (RFC) ACH Reclamation Transition

The purpose of this communication is to notify you of upcoming changes that will affect
your organization’s interactions with the Bureau of the Fiscal Service (BFS). As you may
be aware, BFS is working to consolidate and reorganize various payment and post-
payment operations. In this restructuring, the BFS realignment of work will result in two
focused activities:

e Kansas City Financial Center (KFC) as the BFS Payment Processing Center

e Philadelphia Financial Center (PFC) as the BFS Post-Payment Processing
Center

Effective June 3, 2013, the ACH Reclamation workload currently processed at SFC will
be transitioned to PFC. The ACH Reclamation workload will no longer be supported by
SFC after Friday, May 31, 2013.

We appreciate your patience with this current initiative and strive to provide your agency
with the same quality of customer service you have come to expect. If you have any
questions leading up to and during the transition, please use the below points of contacts
at the respective RFCs:

San Francisco City Financial Center

Debbie Price, Claims Branch Manager (510) 594-7170
Philadelphia Financial Center
Lisa Andre, Customer Service Branch Manager (215) 516-8142
Kevin McDaniels, Customer Service Branch Supervisor (215) 516-8040
PFC Help Desk : (855) 868-0151
Sincerely,
: ‘
QO. s kenglertiie Kk
Philip A. Belisle Elizabeth A. Belinsky
Regional Director Regional Director

San Francisco Financial Center Philadelphia Financial Center
Do Not Pay Quick Reference Card

SAMENT Background

If an entity is present on the System for Award Management (SAM) 

Entity Registration Records (SAMENT), the entity is eligible to do 

business with the federal government in accordance with the Federal 

Acquisitions Regulation (FAR). Because SAMENT is a “list of eligible 

entities,” when an entity doesn’t match against SAMENT in Batch 

Matching (Batch) or Continuous Monitoring (ConMon), it shows as a 

“negative match result” in the Do Not Pay (DNP) Portal. This will be 

explained below.

SAMENT Logic for Bulk File Matching

For typical Batch and ConMon matches, when an entity matches 

against any data source besides SAMENT, the results displayed will 

indicate there is a match against one of the data fields (i.e. TIN, Name, 

etc.) In the instance of bulk file matching against the SAMENT data 

source, when an entity is not present on SAMENT, they are flagged 

and the agency receives a “negative match result,” stating the “UEI/

TIN is not in SAMENT.”

Essentially, the DNP Portal produces a match result for not getting a 

match against SAMENT, meaning agencies then must verify payment 

eligibility of entities who are not on SAMENT.

SAMENT Negative Match Results Explained

Match Results

Shown in the chart below is the DNP 

Portal matching logic for Batch and 

ConMon against the SAMENT data 

source. UEI is the highest priority which 

means that regardless of the presence 

or match status of UEI and TIN, the UEI 

notification message will take 

precedence.

Match Level Portal Logic Match Type (As Shown in 

Portal)

Conclusive

An unmatched Unique Entity Identifier 

(UEI), with any combination of matching 

or unmatching UEI and Taxpayer 

Identification Number (TIN)

UEI NOT IN SAM ENTITY 

REGISTRATION RECORDS

Probable An unmatched TIN (with any combination 

of matching or unmatching UEI)

TIN NOT IN SAM ENTITY 

REGISTRATION RECORDS

Important Links

Data Correction Contacts

https://fiscal.treasury.gov/dnp/privacyprogram.html#data-correction-process

DNP Website

https://fiscal.treasury.gov/dnp/

FAQs

https://fiscal.treasury.gov/dnp/faqs.html
DSF 2_6_13

Development of Chemical Precipitation BAT Design 

Basis and Determining Treatment in Place:

Clarifiers

The following documentation supports EPA’s determination of the BAT design basis for FGD wastewater 

treatment clarifiers. It also describes EPA’s methodology for assessing and determining costs/loads 

credits assigned for existing clarifiers at steam electric plants.
DSF 2_6_13

Evaluation of Clarifiers used for 1-Stage Chemical Precipitation

From the file “CBI_Chem Precip TIP.xlsx,” of the 43 TIP systems:

- 28 are 1-stage

- 2 are 1-stage with both primary (primary solids removal with chems) and secondary clarifiers

- 12 are 2-stage

- 1 is unknown

Note: Of the 43 TIP systems, 9 claimed their FGD wastewater treatment system diagrams to be CBI. Six 

claimed information provided in response to the Steam Electric Survey about their FGD wastewater 

treatment system components to be CBI (Part D, Question D5-2).

Of the 31 1-stage systems:

- 12 have one clarifier

- 18 have two clarifiers

- 1 is unknown

Note: Of the 30 1-stage TIP systems, 8 claimed their FGD wastewater treatment system diagrams to be 

CBI. Five claimed information provided in response to the Steam Electric Survey about their FGD 

wastewater treatment system components to be CBI (Part D, Question D5-2).

Attempted to investigate plants with two clarifiers to determine the total capacity provided by the 

clarifiers (e.g., 2 x100%, 2x75%, 2x50%), but was largely unsuccessful. Survey responses typically 

provide only volume (ft3) and residence time (hr), but not design capacity. Furthermore, plants did not 

indicate how residence time was determined (typical flow, avg design flow, max design flow).

Looked at available information for the 3 BAT plants:

- [Redacted] uses 2x50% clarifiers (based on non-CBI design engineer’s report)

- [Redacted] uses [Redacted] (based on CBI design engineer’s report)

- [Redacted] uses [Redacted] (based on CBI design engineer’s report).

For BAT design basis, decided to cost 2x75% clarifiers as a conservative estimate based on operations at 

the BAT plants.

For determining TIP, although we can generally determine whether plants have one or two clarifiers, we 

cannot easily determine their capacity. At a minimum, plants are presumed to have 100% clarifier 

capacity, regardless of whether satisfied by one or two clarifiers. Many plants presumably have more 

than 100% clarifier capacity, regardless of whether they use one or two clarifiers. Decisions regarding 

the WWTP redundancy are based on many factors, including plant policy. EPA assumes that all TIP plants 

have determined and included appropriate redundancy regardless of whether they installed one or two 

clarifiers.
Northern Rocky Mountain Science Center (NOROCK)

Home | About Us | Science | Product Library | News & Events | Staff | Students |

Study results show trout hybridization.

 (/)

In the western US, all 14 subspecies of native cutthroat trout

degradation and fragmentation, nonnative species introductio

introductions, and has contributed to the decline and extinctio

Hybridization with introduced salmonids is probably the great

empirical studies predict that hybrids between WCT and rainb

local adaptations may not be readily apparent. Furthermore, t

to spread even when hybrids have reduced fitness.

Although the upper Flathead River system in Montana and Bri

existence of these populations is threatened by hybridization 

spread of hybridization in the upper Flathead River. However,

hybridization remain poorly understood in the natural environment.

Scientists at NOROCK and their partners at the University of Montana, Montana State University, and Montana Fish

study to identify the potential impacts of hybridization on fitness of native trout, scientists used paternity analysis

success of approximately 800 trout in Langford Creek, a stream in the Flathead drainage.

For the first time scientists evaluated how various levels of human-mediated hybridization affect fitness of native t

hybridization markedly reduced fitness of male and female trout, with reproductive success sharply declining by ap

however, data suggest that hybridization may spread due to relatively high reproductive success of first-generatio

genes. These results suggest that many inland native cutthroat trout in western North America may be at greater 

The long term impact of trout hybridization between native and non native trout is unknown, though scientists fea

occur, resulting is the loss of unique genetic and ecological adaptations. This study has broader implications beyon

similar complex genetic and policy issues surrounding hybridization, such as the Scottish wildcat, red wolves, Flori

readily adapted to these species.

Currently, there is no official policy for dealing with hybrids under the Endangered Species Act. The most contentio

species, and these issues have been addressed on a case-by-case basis. The study results shows that fitness can q

hybridized populations may need reconsideration.

Results from the study are currently featured in the March 2009 edition of the Biology Letters in print and online. C

(http://rsbl.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/early/2009/03/13/rsbl.2009.0033.full.pdf+html) to view the recently published article.

More information about this project can be found at http://nrmsc.usgs.gov/research/hybrid_trout (http://nrmsc.usgs.g

For more information contact:

Study results show trout hybridization. | Northern Rocky Mountain Scien... http://www.nrmsc.usgs.gov/science/feature/hybrid_trout

1 of 2 4/20/2016 4:48 PM
Clint Muhlfeld

406-888-7926

cmuhlfeld@usgs.gov (mailto:cmuhlfeld@usgs.gov)

Study results show trout hybridization. | Northern Rocky Mountain Scien... http://www.nrmsc.usgs.gov/science/feature/hybrid_trout

2 of 2 4/20/2016 4:48 PM
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF HORIZON
OFFSHORE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES AS OF JUNE 30, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                           7,641
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   16,651
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                39,710
<PP&E>                                         167,581
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (8,759)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 158,822
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           28,222
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,119
<OTHER-SE>                                      87,891
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   204,617
<SALES>                                         35,793
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                35,793
<CGS>                                           26,693
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   26,693
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,467
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,568
<INCOME-TAX>                                       867
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,701
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,701
<EPS-BASIC>                                      .09
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .09


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

:

JOHN PEREZ LEON

:

v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-4267

:

L.P. BENNING, ET AL.

:

ORDER OF REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

AND NOW, this day of , , in accordance with the

procedure for the random assignment of habeas corpus cases, Local Civil Rule 72.1, and 28 U.S.C.

§636(b) (1) (B), it is hereby

ORDERED that the above-captioned case is referred to the Honorable M. FAITH

ANGELL, United States Magistrate Judge, for a report and recommendation.

BY THE COURT:

 

 JAMES MCGIRR KELLY, J.

civrr

Case 2:02-cv-04267-JK Document 2 Filed 07/11/2002 Page 1 of 1
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-21-00154-CR

Alberto Medina

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

117th District Court of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CR14002709-B

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

July 22, 2021
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 224 (Wednesday, November 20, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 69669]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-27777]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK

Intent To Conduct a Detailed Economic Impact Analysis

    This notice is to inform the public that the Export-Import Bank of 
the United States has received an application for a loan guarantee to 
support the export of U.S.-manufactured Boeing 777 wide-body passenger 
aircraft that will be operated by an airline in Russia, which will 
provide passenger services. The specific amount of the loan guarantee, 
the value of the transaction, and the amount of new foreign production 
capacity are not included here because they are proprietary 
information. However, the total value of the transaction is in excess 
of $200 million and, based on currently available information, the 
amount of increased wide-body seat capacity resulting from these 
aircraft will be 1% or more of comparable wide-body seat capacity 
within the U.S. airline industry. The aircraft in this transaction will 
enable passenger route service within Russia and from Russia to various 
regional and international destinations, potentially including the 
United States.
    Interested parties may submit comments on this transaction by email 
to economic.impact@exim.gov or by mail to 811 Vermont Avenue NW., Room 
442, Washington, DC 20571, within 14 days of the date this notice 
appears in the Federal Register.

James C. Cruse,
Senior Vice President, Policy and Planning.
[FR Doc. 2013-27777 Filed 11-19-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6690-01-P
```