alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Integrated
Healthcare Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2006,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company at the dates and for the period indicated.

     This Certificate has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.


Dated: November 2, 2006                      By:  /s/ Bruce Mogel
                                                  ---------------
                                                  Bruce Mogel
                                                  Chief Executive Officer


                                       40
February 2023 Bureau of the Fiscal Service

United States Department of the Treasury 

Bureau of the Fiscal Service 

Treatise on Federal Nontax Debt Collection Law 

INTRODUCTION

This Treatise on Federal Nontax Debt Collection Law (Treatise) provides legal background on 

the collection of nontax debts owed to the United States (referred to as “federal nontax debts”). 

Federal nontax debts may arise from several sources, including direct or guaranteed loans; 

overpayments to federal employees, contractors, or benefit recipients; and unpaid fees, fines and 

penalties. If the United States cannot collect debt owed to it, it must eventually terminate its 

collection efforts and realize the loss. The more debt the United States collects, the less it must 

borrow or raise to fund Government services. Federal agencies have a legal responsibility to 

collect debts owed to the United States, as required and authorized by various laws. 

The purpose of this Treatise is to provide federal agency counsel and program staff with an indepth explanation and interpretation of the laws that govern administrative collection of federal 

nontax debts, including statutes, regulations, federal common law, interpretive guidance, and the 

positions that the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s Bureau of the Fiscal Service has taken on 

debt collection legal matters. 

This Treatise covers the laws that apply generally to all federal agencies and programs and does 

not address program-specific laws, which may interact with, and sometimes take precedence 

over, the governmentwide rules. While this Treatise will be updated periodically, before relying 

on the interpretations contained in this Treatise, agencies should validate that the state of the law. 

Also, agency program staff should always consult with their legal counsel on agency and 

program-specific questions. Finally, agencies should evaluate whether their debt collection 

programs have standards in place to promote equitable outcomes.
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 33 (Thursday, February 17, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 9328]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-3563]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION OF FINE ARTS

Notice of Meeting

    The next meeting of the U.S. Commission of Fine Arts is scheduled 
for 17 February 2011, at 10 a.m. in the Commission offices at the 
National Building Museum, Suite 312, Judiciary Square, 401 F Street, 
NW., Washington, DC 20001-2728. Items of discussion may include 
buildings, parks and memorials.
    Draft agendas and additional information regarding the Commission 
are available on our Web site: http://www.cfa.gov. Inquiries regarding 
the agenda and requests to submit written or oral statements should be 
addressed to Thomas Luebke, Secretary, U.S. Commission of Fine Arts, at 
the above address; by e-mailing staff@cfa.gov; or by calling 202-504-
2200. Individuals requiring sign language interpretation for the 
hearing impaired should contact the Secretary at least 10 days before 
the meeting date.

    Dated February 8, 2011 in Washington, DC.
Thomas Luebke,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-3563 Filed 2-16-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6330-01-M
```
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CertificationPursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Wilson W. Cheung,certify that:

 

1. Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of AXT, Inc.;

 

2.Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure thatmaterial information relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectivenessof the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period coveredby this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscalquarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5. Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors:

 

(a)All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

(b)Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 
| Dated: November 7, 2007 | By:    | /s/ Wilson W. Cheung    |
|-------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                    |   | Wilson W. Cheung        |
|                    |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

----
Case 2:04-cv-04020-JCJ Document 1 Filed 08/24/04 Page 1 of 12
Case 2:04-cv-04020-JCJ Document 1 Filed 08/24/04 Page 2 of 12
Case 2:04-cv-04020-JCJ Document 1 Filed 08/24/04 Page 3 of 12
Case 2:04-cv-04020-JCJ Document 1 Filed 08/24/04 Page 4 of 12
Case 2:04-cv-04020-JCJ Document 1 Filed 08/24/04 Page 5 of 12
Case 2:04-cv-04020-JCJ Document 1 Filed 08/24/04 Page 6 of 12
Case 2:04-cv-04020-JCJ Document 1 Filed 08/24/04 Page 7 of 12
Case 2:04-cv-04020-JCJ Document 1 Filed 08/24/04 Page 8 of 12
Case 2:04-cv-04020-JCJ Document 1 Filed 08/24/04 Page 9 of 12
Case 2:04-cv-04020-JCJ Document 1 Filed 08/24/04 Page 10 of 12
Case 2:04-cv-04020-JCJ Document 1 Filed 08/24/04 Page 11 of 12
Case 2:04-cv-04020-JCJ Document 1 Filed 08/24/04 Page 12 of 12
### Freshwater-use trends in Maryland, 1985-2000

By: Judith C. Wheeler

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/fs11203

#### Links

- More information:  **USGS Index Page**                            (html)
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                      ANNUITY AND LIFE RE (HOLDINGS), LTD.
            STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
                                   UNAUDITED
         (EXPRESSED IN UNITED STATES DOLLARS EXCEPT FOR SHARE AMOUNTS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                        3 MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30     9 MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30
                                        ----------------------------    ----------------------------
                                            2000            1999            2000            1999
                                        ------------    ------------    ------------    ------------
<S>                                     <C>             <C>             <C>             <C>
Net Income............................  $10,900,901     $ 8,715,060     $26,536,962     $25,943,583
Net average number of common shares
  outstanding.........................   25,499,999      25,499,999      25,499,999      25,499,999
Weighted average number of common
  shares outstanding including shares
  issuable from exercise of options
  and warrants........................   27,419,525      27,218,541      27,383,590      27,177,007
Earnings per share....................  $      0.43     $      0.34     $      1.04     $      1.02
Earnings per share assuming
  dilution............................  $      0.40     $      0.32     $      0.97     $      0.95
</TABLE>

                                       17
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

June 24, 2014

N o. 04

- 14

- 00318

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF C.K., A CHILD,

From the 288th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013

- PA

- 01216 Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellant appeals the trial court’s termination of his parental rights. Appellant’s attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California , 368 U.S. 738 (1967), in which he asserts there are no meritorious issues to raise on appeal. In In re R.R. , No. 04

- 03

- 00096

- CV, 2003 WL 21157944, at *4 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio May 21, 2003, no pet.), we held that in parental

termination appeals, a proced ure akin to Anders is necessary to best protect the statutory right to counsel on appeal, to provide a procedural mechanism for counsel to fulfill his ethical obligations, to assist the court in deciding appeals, and to provide consistent procedures for al l indigent litigants. In compliance with the procedure set out in Anders , appellant’s attorn ey has informed appellant of his right to file his own brief. Nichols v. State , 954 S.W.2d 83, 85 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1997, no pet.); Bruns v. State , 924 S.W.2d 176, 177 n.1 (Tex. App.

— San Antonio 1996, no pet.). The State has filed a letter waiving its right to file an appellee’s brief unless the appellant files a pro se brief.

If appellant desires to file a pro se brief, he must do so within thirty days from the date of this order. If appellant files a pro se brief, appellee may file a responsive brief no later than twenty days after the date appellant’s pro se brief is filed in this court. We ORDER the motion to withdraw, filed by appellant’s counsel, to be H ELD IN ABEYANCE pending further order of

the court.

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 24th day of June, 2014

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Before the First Division,

March 26, 1953

No. 57210.

protest 169259-K (Boston).

#### Wm. Filene’s Sons Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of turn or turned boots and shoes similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Railway Express Agency, Inc.*v. *United States*(27 Cust. Ct. 91, C. D. 1353), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 12.1
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**
I, Alex Mandl, ChiefExecutive Officer of Gemplus International S.A., certifythat:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Gemplus InternationalS.A.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annualreport;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theregistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theregistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known tous by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this annual report is being prepared; b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this annual report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report, based on suchevaluation; and c) disclosed in this report any change in registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the period covered bythis annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, tothe registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a) all significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control overfinancial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and reportfinancial information, and b) any fraud, whether or not material,that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant rolein the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.
Date: June 30, 2004    /s/ Alex Mandl   Alex Mandl Chief Executive Officer
# C_2017202EN.01001702.xml

| 26.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/17

---

Judgment of the General Court of 5 May 2017 — Globo Media v EUIPO — Globo Comunicação e Participações (GLOBO MEDIA)

(Case T-262/16) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark GLOBO MEDIA - Earlier national figurative mark TV GLOBO PORTUGAL - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2017/C 202/30)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Globo Media, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: L. Estropá Navarro and J. Calderón Chavero, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral and B. Uriarte Valiente, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Globo Comunicação e Participações S/A (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 14 March 2016 (Case R 0561/2014-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Globo Comunicação e Participações and Globo Media.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Globo Media, SA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Globo Media, SA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 260, 18.7.2016.

1

---
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION**I, Brian T. Marley, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Belk, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in ExchangeAct Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or causedsuch internal control over financial reporting to be designed under oursupervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability offinancial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the designor operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.Date: September 8, 2005/s/ Brian T. Marley
null

2017-09-22

355.9465

eng - Argued: 2017-09-22. Docket number: 16-3871
# C_2022303EN.01003602.xml

| 8.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 303/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 303/36

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 June 2022 — YY and ZA v Court of Justice of the European Union

(Case T-545/16) (1)

(Civil service - Officials - 2014 reform of the Staff Regulations - Reimbursement of annual travel expenses - Place of origin located in a third country - Flat-rate payment calculated on the basis of the distance separating the place of employment from the capital of the Member State of which the official is a national)

(2022/C 303/44)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: YY, ZA (represented by: J.-N. Louis, R. Metz, D. Verbeke, T. Van Lysebeth and N. Maes, lawyers)

Defendant: Court of Justice of the European Union (represented by: J. Inghelram and A. Ysebaert, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: European Parliament (represented by: E. Taneva and M. Ecker, acting as Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and R. Meyer, acting as Agents)

Re:

Applications under Article 270 TFEU for annulment of the decisions to reduce or discontinue, from 1 January 2014, the reimbursement of annual travel expenses enabling the applicants to maintain a connection with their place of origin.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Order YY and ZA to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the Court of Justice of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Order YY and ZA to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the Court of Justice of the European Union;

| 3. | Orders the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union each to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union each to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 146, 4.5.2015 (case initially registered before the European Civil Service Tribunal under Case No F-36/15 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1.9.2016).

---