alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

SYDNEY BRADSHAW

Petitioner,

v.

IMMIGRATION AND

NATURALIZATION SERVICE, ET AL

Respondents.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

CIVIL ACTION

NO. 02-CV-4268

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

Kindly enter my appearance on behalf of the Immigration

and Naturalization Service, et al., Federal Respondents in the

above-captioned matter. 

 

Stephen J. Britt

Assistant United States Attorney 

615 Chestnut Street, Suite 1250 

Philadelphia, PA 19106

(215) 451-8443

Dated: September 20, 2002

Case 2:02-cv-04268-CG Document 7 Filed 09/20/2002 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on this date I caused a true and

correct copy of the foregoing to be served by first-class United

States mail, postage prepaid, upon the following: 

Sydney Bradshaw

Berks County Prison

1287 County Welfare Road

Leesport, PA 19533

 

 

Stephen J. Britt

Assistant United States Attorney

Dated: September 20, 2002 

Case 2:02-cv-04268-CG Document 7 Filed 09/20/2002 Page 2 of 2
# MTS Cover

# Table 1

# Table 2

# Figure 1

# Figure 2

# Figure 3

# Figure 4

# Figure 5

# Figure 6

# Figure 7

# Figure 8

# Table 3

# Table 4

# Table 5

# Table 6

# Table 6A

# Table 6B

# Table 6C

# Table 6D

# Table 6E

# Table 7

# Table 8

# Table 9

# image1.png

# image2.png

# image3.png

# image4.png

# image5.png

# image6.png

# image7.png

# image8.png

# image9.png

# image10.png
Filed 9/10/20 P. v. Alma raz CA4/1

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication

or or dered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

FRANCISCO C

. ALMAR A Z,

Defendant and Appellant. D077238

(Super. Ct. No. SCE393591 )

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County,

Robert O. Amador, Judge. Affirmed.

Matthew Aaron Lopas, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for

Defendant and Appellant.

No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Francisco Colin Almaraz entered into a plea agreement with a

stipulated sentence. Almaraz pleaded guilty to transportation of cocaine for

sale (Health and Saf. Code, 1 § 11352, subd. (a)). Almaraz admitted a weight

1 All further statutory references are to the Health and Safety Code

unless otherwise specified.2

allegation (§ 11370.4, subd. (a)( 2 )). The parties stipulated that Almaraz

would serve eight years in local prison. The remaining charges and

allegations were dismissed.

Almaraz was sentenced to the stipulated eight

- year term. The court

ordered a $2,400 restitution fine and various fees and assessments. The

defense did not object.

Almaraz filed a timely notice of appeal but did not obtain a certificate

of probable cause (Pen. Code, § 1237.5).

Appellate counsel has filed a brief pursuant t o People v. Wende (1979)

25 Cal.3d 436 ( Wende ) indicating he has not been able to identify any

arguable issues for reversal on appeal. Counsel asks the court to review the

record for error as mandated by Wende . We offered Almaraz the opportunity

to file his own brief on appeal, but he has not responded.

STATEMENT OF FACTS

In his change of plea, Almaraz admitted he transported in excess of

four kilos of cocaine for purposes of sale.

DISCUSSION

As we have noted

, appellate counsel has filed a Wende brief and asks

the court to review the record for error. To assist the court in its review of

the record, and in compliance with Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738

( Anders ), counsel has identified three possible issues that were considered in

evalu ating the potential merits of this appeal:

1. Was Almaraz ’ s plea constitutionally valid;

2. Did the court err by imposing fines, fees and assessments without

holding a hearing on the defendant ’ s ability to pay; and

3. Was counsel ineffective for fail ing to object to the fines, fees and

assessments.3

We have reviewed the entire record as mandated by Wende and Anders.

We have not discovered any arguable issues for reversal on appeal.

Competent counsel has represented Almaraz on this appeal.

DISPOSITIO N

The judgment is affirmed.

HUFFMAN, J.

WE CONCUR:

McCONNELL, P. J.

HALLER, J.
Company Suwannee Holcim Location Branford, FL Trident
Kiln 1 Kiln 1 Rank = 12 Avg (ppmvd) 5.68 5.69
Count 274 762 99th percentile (ppmvd) 10.84 15.14 No CISWI Analysis:
30

‐ Day Rolling THC Averages (ppmv) March 1, 2011
# C_2016296EN.01004402.xml

| 16.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 296/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 296/44

---

Action brought on 22 May 2016 — ZZ v eu-LISA and Commission

(Case F-26/16)

(2016/C 296/55)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: M. Greinoman, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendants:

Defendants:

European Agency for the Operational Management of Large-Scale Information Systems in the Area of Freedom, Security and Justice (eu-LISA)

and

European Commission

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision denying the applicant prior authorisation for medical treatment for her husband under the EU Joint Sickness Insurance Scheme.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision rejecting the prior authorisation for the medical treatment of the applicant’s husband covered by the Joint Sickness Insurance Scheme; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision rejecting the prior authorisation for the medical treatment of the applicant’s husband covered by the Joint Sickness Insurance Scheme;

| — | declare that hepatitis C being suffered by the applicant’s husband is a serious disease within the meaning of Article 72(1) of the Staff Regulations; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that hepatitis C being suffered by the applicant’s husband is a serious disease within the meaning of Article 72(1) of the Staff Regulations;

| — | order the defendants to bear the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendants to bear the costs.

---
# C_2018328EN.01004501.xml

| 17.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 328/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 328/45

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 July 2018 — Crédit agricole v ECB

(Case T-758/16) (1)

((Prudential supervision of credit institutions - Article 4(1)(d) and (3) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 - Calculation of the leverage ratio - The ECB’s refusal to authorise the applicant to exclude from the calculation of the leverage ratio the exposures fulfilling certain conditions - Article 429(14) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 - Discretion of the ECB - Errors of law - Manifest error of assessment))

(2018/C 328/60)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Crédit agricole SA (Montrouge, France) (represented by: A. Champsaur and A. Delors, lawyers)

Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: K. Lackhoff, R. Bax, G. Bassani and C. Olivier, acting as Agents, and by H.-G. Kamann and F. Louis, lawyers)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Republic of Finland (represented by: S. Hartikainen, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking annulment of Decision ECB/SSM/2016 969500TJ5KRTCJQWXH05/165 of the ECB, of 24 August 2016, pursuant to Article 4(1)(d), of Article 10 of Council Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 of 15 October 2013 conferring specific tasks on the European Central Bank concerning policies relating to the prudential supervision of credit institutions (OJ 2013 L 287, p. 63), and of Article 429(14) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms and amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 (OJ 2013 L 176, p. 1, and corrigenda OJ 2013 L 208, p. 68 and OJ 2013 L 321, p. 6).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Decision ECB/SSM/2016 969500TJ5KRTCJQWXH05/165 of the European Central Bank of 24 August 2016; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Decision ECB/SSM/2016 969500TJ5KRTCJQWXH05/165 of the European Central Bank of 24 August 2016;

| 2. | Orders the ECB to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the ECB to pay the costs;

| 3. | Orders the Republic of Finland to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Republic of Finland to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 6, 9.1.2017.

---
## THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS Post Office Box 12248 Austin, Texas 78711 (512) 463-1312

January 06, 2000

Mr. Timothy S. Durst Baker & Botts 2001 Ross Avenue, Suite 700 Dallas, TX 75201-2980

Mr. Joseph D. Cheavens · 

## fiLED \N
Baker & Botts 

### COURT OF APPEALS 100 Shell Plaza 910 Louisiana 

### JAN 

## 1 0 2C\fJu Houston, TX 77002-4995 

## ATZ USA M OlSTR\CT Mr. R. Laurance Macon 

## ClERK. 5th Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld 300 Convent Street, Suite 1500 San Antonio, TX 78205

Mr. David 

## J. Healey Tobor Goldstein & Healey 1360 Post Oak Blvd., Suite 2300 Houston, TX 77056-3023

Ms. Lynne Liberato Haynes & Boone 1000 Louisiana, Suite 4300 Houston, TX 77002-5012

RE: Case Number 98-1243 Court of Appeals Number: 05-98-01204-CV Trial Court Number: 96-08262-L Mr. Bob E. Shannon 

# co,k 1 lff) 

# IN Baker & Botts 

### T OF 

### APPfALI 98 San Jacinto Blvd., Suite 1600 Austin, TX 78701-4039

Mr. Joseph R. Knight Baker & Botts 1 !} 

## 2000
USA MATZ CLERK, 5th 

## DISTRICT

98 San Jacinto Blvd., Suite 1600 Austin, TX 78701-4039

Mr. Jack Hightower Hilgers & Watkins P. 0. Box 2063 Austin, TX 78768-2063

Ms. Nina Cortell Haynes & Boone 901 Main Street, Suite 3100 Dallas, TX 75202-3789

Mr. Mike A. Hatchell Ramey & Flock P. 0. Box 629 Tyler, TX 75710-0629

Style: IN RE ALCATEL USA, INC., f/k/a DSC COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION

Dear Counsel:

Today, the Supreme Court of Texas delivered the enclosed opinion/sin the above referenced

cause denying the petition for writ of mandamus and overruling the emergency motion to consider trial developments or alternatively to vacate and remand.

Also enclosed is the judgment of the Supreme Court as it appears in the minutes. This is the judgment that will issue in mandate form if no motion for rehearing is filed, or if a motion for rehearing is overruled.

## THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS
Post Office Box 12248 Austin, Texas 78711

Encl.



### cc: Ms. Lisa Matz, Clerk Mr. Jim Hamlin The Honorable Frank Andrews Hon. Michael 

## J. O'Neill Sincerely,

John T. Adams Clerk (512) 463-1312·,.-.....,ijtqeQlourtof'Q!exasPOSTOFFICEBOX12248AUSTIN,TEXAS78711-..,.::MSLISAMATZCLERKFIFTHSUPREMEJUDICIALDISTRICT·600COMMERCE2NDFLOORDALLASTX75202-4658-.,.........__..·"'
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

      I, David L. Gamsey, Chief Financial Officer of Innotrac Corporation (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted by Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended
      June 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

Dated: August 13, 2004


                                    /s/ David L. Gamsey
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    David L. Gamsey
                                    Senior Vice President, Chief Financial
                                    Officer and Secretary
## IN THE COURT O F CRIMINA L A PPEA LS OF TEXAS NO. WR-83,395-01

EX P ARTE GILBERT DEL ACRUZ , Appli cant
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 13-CR- 3455-H IN THE 347T H DISTRICT COURT

F ROM NUECES COUNTY
Per curiam . O P I N I O N Pursuant to the provisions of Ar t i cl e 1 1
. 07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y oung , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant enter ed an open plea of guilty to assault with family

violence, e nhance d, and wa s sentence d to twenty-five year s’ imprisonment. Applicant contends that hi s co u nsel rende red ineffe ctive assistance beca use he failed to t imely file a notice of appeal. Trial counsel has submitt ed an aff idavit responding to Applica n t ’s alleg ations. Counsel states that there was a brea kdown in communication, and that as a result of this brea kdown, he did not g o over the meaning and eff ect of the judgme nt, Applicant’s right to appea l,2

and the ne cessity

of g iving notice of appe al with Applicant. The trial court has deter

mined that counsel failed to timely file a notice of appea l. We find that Applica n t i s en titled to the opportunity to file an out-of-time appea l of the judgme nt of conviction in Cause No. 13-CR-3455-H from the 347th District Court of Nuec es County
. Applicant is order ed returne d to that time at which he may g ive a written notice of appea l so that he may then, with the aid of counsel, obtain a meaning ful appea l. Within ten days of the issuance of this opinion, the trial court shall deter

mine whether Applicant is indige nt. I f Applicant is indige nt and wishes to be repr esente d by counsel, the trial court shall immediately appoint an attorney to repr esent Applicant on direc t appeal. All time limit s shall be calc ulated as if the sentenc e had been imposed
o n t he date on which the mandate of this Court issues. We hold that, should Applicant d es i re t o prosec ute an appea l, he must take aff irmative steps to file a written notice of appea l in the trial court within 30 day s after

the mandate of this Court issues. Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Depa rtment of Crimin a l J ustice-Corr ectional Institut ions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Deliver ed: July

29, 2015 Do not publish
t 

FIRST CENSUS I OF THE UNITED STATES 

1790 .- 4% 

MAINE 

S. N. ID. NORTH, DIRECTOR 1 

AT THE FIRST CENSUS OF THE 

UNITED STATES TAKEN 

IN THE YEAR 

1790 

WASHINGTON 

GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 

AI I908 

- Title Page
- Introduction
- An Act Providing for the Enumeration for the Inhabitants of the United States	
- Population of the United States as Returned at the First Census, by States
- Summary of Population, by Counties,Towns, Etc.
- Assistant Marshals for the State
- Names of Heads of Families - Cumberland County to Lincoln County
- Names of Heads of Families - Washington County to York County
- Index
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION**In connection with the Quarterly Report of Midwest Banc Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onMay 10, 2007 (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.       /s/ James J. Giancola     Name: James J. Giancola  Title: President and    Chief Executive Officer  Date: May 10, 2007       /s/ Daniel R. Kadolph     Name: Daniel R. Kadolph  Title: Executive Vice President and    Chief Financial Officer  Date: May 10, 2007
Case 2:05-cv-00417-MAM Document 239 Filed 08/20/09 Page 1 of 21
Case 2:05-cv-00417-MAM Document 239 Filed 08/20/09 Page 2 of 21
Case 2:05-cv-00417-MAM Document 239 Filed 08/20/09 Page 3 of 21
Case 2:05-cv-00417-MAM Document 239 Filed 08/20/09 Page 4 of 21
Case 2:05-cv-00417-MAM Document 239 Filed 08/20/09 Page 5 of 21
Case 2:05-cv-00417-MAM Document 239 Filed 08/20/09 Page 6 of 21
Case 2:05-cv-00417-MAM Document 239 Filed 08/20/09 Page 7 of 21
Case 2:05-cv-00417-MAM Document 239 Filed 08/20/09 Page 8 of 21
Case 2:05-cv-00417-MAM Document 239 Filed 08/20/09 Page 9 of 21
Case 2:05-cv-00417-MAM Document 239 Filed 08/20/09 Page 10 of 21
Case 2:05-cv-00417-MAM Document 239 Filed 08/20/09 Page 11 of 21
Case 2:05-cv-00417-MAM Document 239 Filed 08/20/09 Page 12 of 21
Case 2:05-cv-00417-MAM Document 239 Filed 08/20/09 Page 13 of 21
Case 2:05-cv-00417-MAM Document 239 Filed 08/20/09 Page 14 of 21
Case 2:05-cv-00417-MAM Document 239 Filed 08/20/09 Page 15 of 21
Case 2:05-cv-00417-MAM Document 239 Filed 08/20/09 Page 16 of 21
Case 2:05-cv-00417-MAM Document 239 Filed 08/20/09 Page 17 of 21
Case 2:05-cv-00417-MAM Document 239 Filed 08/20/09 Page 18 of 21
Case 2:05-cv-00417-MAM Document 239 Filed 08/20/09 Page 19 of 21
Case 2:05-cv-00417-MAM Document 239 Filed 08/20/09 Page 20 of 21
Case 2:05-cv-00417-MAM Document 239 Filed 08/20/09 Page 21 of 21
# November 2022
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Reserve System

The notificants listed below have applied under the Change in Bank Control Act (Act) (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)) and § 225.41 of the Board's Regulation Y (12 CFR 225.41) to acquire shares of a bank or bank holding company. The factors that are considered in acting on the applications are set forth in paragraph 7 of the Act (12 U.S.C. 1817(j)(7)).

                    The public portions of the applications listed below, as well as other related filings required by the Board, if any, are available for immediate inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank(s) indicated below and at the offices of the Board of Governors. This information may also be obtained on an expedited basis, upon request, by contacting the appropriate Federal Reserve Bank and from the Board's Freedom of Information Office at                     *https://www.federalreserve.gov/​foia/​request.htm.*                     Interested persons may express their views in writing on the standards enumerated in paragraph 7 of the Act.                

Comments regarding each of these applications must be received at the Reserve Bank indicated or the offices of the Board of Governors, Ann E. Misback, Secretary of the Board, 20th Street and Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20551-0001, not later than November 22, 2023.

*A. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City*                     (Jeffrey Imgarten, Assistant Vice President) One Memorial Drive, Kansas City, Missouri, 64198. Comments can also be sent electronically to                     *KCapplicationcomments@kc.frb.org:*

                    1.                     *Sarah George, Louisburg, Kansas;*                     to join the Shannon Family Control Group, a group acting in concert, to acquire voting shares of Central Kansas Bancshares, Inc., Woodbine, Kansas, and thereby indirectly acquire voting shares of The Citizens State Bank and Trust Company, Council Grove, Kansas.                

Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.

Michele Taylor Fennell,

Deputy Associate Secretary of the Board.

[FR Doc. 2023-24571 Filed 11-6-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
# C_2019044EN.01002001.xml

| 4.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/20

---

Judgment of the General Court of 27 November 2018 — VG v Commission

(Joined Cases T-314/16 and T-435/16) (1)

((Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents and information relating to a decision of the Commission to put an end to a ‘letter of agreement and membership of Team Europe’ - Refusal of access - Exception relating to the protection of privacy and the protection of individuals - Protection of personal data - Regulation (EC) No 45/2001 - Refusal of transfer - Articles 7, 47 and 48 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights - Non-contractual liability))

(2019/C 44/24)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: VG, as the sole heir of Ms (represented initially by: L. Levi and M. Vandenbussche, and subsequently by: L. Levi, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by: F. Clotuche-Duvieusart and A. Simon, and subsequently by: F. Clotuche-Duvieusart and B. Mongin, acting as Agents)

Re:

First, application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the decisions of the Commission of 2 February and 19 April 2016 rejecting MS’ application for access to the documents concerning him and of 16 June 2016 rejecting his request to transfer to him the personal data concerning him contained in the documents covered by that application for access and, secondly, application based on Article 268 TFEU seeking compensation for the harm allegedly suffered by Ms on account of that refusal of access and transfer.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the European Commission of 16 June 2016 rejecting MS’ request to transfer to him certain personal data; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the European Commission of 16 June 2016 rejecting MS’ request to transfer to him certain personal data;

| 2. | Orders the Commission to pay VG, as the sole heir of MS, a sum of EUR 5 000; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Commission to pay VG, as the sole heir of MS, a sum of EUR 5 000;

| 3. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 4. | Orders VG and the Commission to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders VG and the Commission to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 63, 27.2.2017.

---