alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
-1-

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MARIA A. MONTEVERDE, : CIVIL ACTION NO.: 02-cv-4214

:

Plaintiff, :

:

vs. :

:

PPL ELECTRIC UTILITIES :

CORPORATION, :

:

Defendant. :

PLAINTIFF’S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO VACATE

ORDER OF DISMISSAL ENTERED PURSUANT TO LOCAL

RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 41.1(b).

INTRODUCTION:

 On October 30, 2002, this Court entered an Order pursuant to Rule 41.1(b) of the Local 

Rules of Civil Procedure, dismissing this action upon having received notification that the matter

had been settled between the parties.

The Plaintiff, Maria Monteverde, now moves for this Court to vacate its Rule 41.1(b) 

Order, thereby reactivating the case upon the following showing of good cause.

LEGAL ARGUMENT:

 Pursuant to Rule 41.1(b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure, a party may seek to 

vacate, modify or strike such an Order with a showing of good cause as to why the Order should

be set aside or modified. Wyndmoor Learning Center v. City of Wilmington, 1996 WL 117771

*7 EDPA, (March 12, 1996). Because good cause can be demonstrated by the instant Plaintiff,

the Court’s prior Order should rightfully be vacated.

Case 2:02-cv-04214-MAM Document 9-2 Filed 12/23/2002 Page 1 of 3
-2-

Pursuant to the terms of the settlement agreement, the Plaintiff was afforded the 

opportunity in accordance with the mandates of the Older Workers Benefit Protection Act to

revoke the Agreement within seven (7) days of the date of her execution by sending such notice

of revocation, by hand delivery to the Defendant’s counsel located in Allentown, Pennsylvania.

Accordingly, the Agreement was not binding upon the Plaintiff until the expiration of the seven

(7) day revocation period. 

On December 2, 2002, within the revocation time frame, Plaintiff’s counsel hand 

delivered a letter to Andrew K. Williams, Esquire in Allentown, Pennsylvania, giving notice of

the Plaintiff’s notice to formerly revoke her decision to settle the above-referenced matter.

 Thus, in accordance with public policy and the rights afforded to the Plaintiff under the

Older Workers’ Benefits Protection Act, the Settlement Agreement was lawfully revoked. (See

Exhibit “B”).

Having demonstrated that good cause exists to vacate this Court’s prior Oder issued 

under Rule 41.1 (b), the instant Plaintiff requests that this action be reopened to further

prosecution to its proper conclusion.

 LOVITZ & GOLD, P.C.

BY:_______________________

 SIDNEY L. GOLD, ESQUIRE

 Attorney I.D. No. 21374

 KEVIN I. LOVITZ, ESQUIRE

 Attorney I.D. No. 70184

 515 Eleven Penn Center

 1835 Market Street

 Philadelphia, PA 19103

 (215) 569-1999

 Attorneys for Plaintiff

Case 2:02-cv-04214-MAM Document 9-2 Filed 12/23/2002 Page 2 of 3
-3-

Case 2:02-cv-04214-MAM Document 9-2 Filed 12/23/2002 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 99


          Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted
            Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Alan Fine, Chief Executive Officer of Rosedale Decorative Products Ltd. (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1) the  Quarterly  Report on Form  10-QSB of the  Company  for the  fiscal
quarter ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the  requirements
of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m or 78o(d)); and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.




Dated: August 13, 2002


                                                     /s/ ALAN FINE
                                                         Alan Fine,
                                                         Chief Executive Officer


<PAGE>
          Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted
            Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     I,  Norman G.  Maxwell,  Chief  Financial  Officer of  Rosedale  Decorative
Products  Ltd.  (the  "Company"),  certifies,  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  18  U.S.C.  Section  1350,  that to the best of my
knowledge:

     (1) the  Quarterly  Report on Form  10-QSB of the  Company  for the  fiscal
quarter ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the  requirements
of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m or 78o(d)); and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.




Dated: August 13, 2002



                                                     /s/ NORMAN G.  MAXWELL
                                                         Norman G. Maxwell,
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
Case 2:05-cv-00232-TON Document 96 Filed 12/08/2008 Page 1 of 6
Case 2:05-cv-00232-TON Document 96 Filed 12/08/2008 Page 2 of 6
Case 2:05-cv-00232-TON Document 96 Filed 12/08/2008 Page 3 of 6
Case 2:05-cv-00232-TON Document 96 Filed 12/08/2008 Page 4 of 6
Case 2:05-cv-00232-TON Document 96 Filed 12/08/2008 Page 5 of 6
Case 2:05-cv-00232-TON Document 96 Filed 12/08/2008 Page 6 of 6
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Integrated
Healthcare Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended December 31,
2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company at the dates and for the period indicated

      This Certificate has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.


                                        INTEGRATED HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS, INC.

Dated: February 20, 2007                By:  /s/ Bruce Mogel
                                             ------------------------------
                                             Bruce Mogel
                                             Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> UT
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE BALANCE
SHEET AND INCOME STATEMENT FOR THE COMPANY FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO THE COMPANY'S FORM 10-Q
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2000.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             OCT-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<BOOK-VALUE>                                  PER-BOOK
<TOTAL-NET-UTILITY-PLANT>                      126,733
<OTHER-PROPERTY-AND-INVEST>                      2,882
<TOTAL-CURRENT-ASSETS>                          27,039
<TOTAL-DEFERRED-CHARGES>                         1,312
<OTHER-ASSETS>                                   6,082
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 164,048
<COMMON>                                            49
<CAPITAL-SURPLUS-PAID-IN>                       18,743
<RETAINED-EARNINGS>                             50,104
<TOTAL-COMMON-STOCKHOLDERS-EQ>                  68,896
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-NET>                            55,836
<SHORT-TERM-NOTES>                                 710
<LONG-TERM-NOTES-PAYABLE>                            0
<COMMERCIAL-PAPER-OBLIGATIONS>                       0
<LONG-TERM-DEBT-CURRENT-PORT>                    2,746
<PREFERRED-STOCK-CURRENT>                            0
<CAPITAL-LEASE-OBLIGATIONS>                          0
<LEASES-CURRENT>                                     0
<OTHER-ITEMS-CAPITAL-AND-LIAB>                  35,860
<TOT-CAPITALIZATION-AND-LIAB>                  164,048
<GROSS-OPERATING-REVENUE>                       45,462
<INCOME-TAX-EXPENSE>                             4,054
<OTHER-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      31,928
<TOTAL-OPERATING-EXPENSES>                      35,982
<OPERATING-INCOME-LOSS>                          9,480
<OTHER-INCOME-NET>                               (159)
<INCOME-BEFORE-INTEREST-EXPEN>                   9,321
<TOTAL-INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         2,456
<NET-INCOME>                                     6,865
<PREFERRED-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                          0
<EARNINGS-AVAILABLE-FOR-COMM>                    6,865
<COMMON-STOCK-DIVIDENDS>                         2,303
<TOTAL-INTEREST-ON-BONDS>                        4,378<F1>
<CASH-FLOW-OPERATIONS>                           8,451
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.40
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.39
<FN>
<F1>
TOTAL INTEREST ON BONDS REPRESENTS ANNUAL INTEREST EXPENSE TO BE INCURRED DURING
FISCAL YEAR 2000 ON LONG-TERM DEBT OUTSTANDING UNDER FIRST MORTGAGE BONDS AND
LONG-TERM SECURED NOTES.
</FN>


</TABLE>
# C_2018328EN.01004401.xml

| 17.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 328/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 328/44

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 July 2018 — Société générale v ECB

(Case T-757/16) (1)

((Economic and monetary policy - Prudential supervision of credit institutions - Article 4(1)(d) and (3) of Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 - Calculation of the leverage ratio - The ECB’s refusal to authorise the applicant to exclude from the calculation of the leverage ratio the exposures fulfilling certain conditions - Article 429(14) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 - Discretion of the ECB - Errors of law - Manifest error of assessment))

(2018/C 328/59)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: Société générale (Paris, France) (represented by: initially A. Gosset-Grainville, C. Renner and P. Kupka, then A. Gosset-Grainville, P. Kupka and M. Trabucchi and finally A. Gosset-Grainville and M. Trabucchi, lawyers)

Defendant: European Central Bank (ECB) (represented by: K. Lackhoff, R. Bax and G. Bassani, acting as Agents, and by H.-G. Kamann and F. Louis, lawyers)

Intervener in support of the defendant: Republic of Finland (represented by: S. Hartikainen, acting as Agent)

Re:

Action based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking annulment of Decision ECB/SSM/2016 O2RNE8IBXP4R0TD8PU41/72 of the ECB, of 24 August 2016, pursuant to Article 4(1)(d), of Article 10 of Council Regulation (EU) No 1024/2013 of 15 October 2013 conferring specific tasks on the European Central Bank concerning policies relating to the prudential supervision of credit institutions (OJ 2013 L 287, p. 63), and of Article 429(14) of Regulation (EU) No 575/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms and amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 (OJ 2013 L 176, p. 1, and corrigenda OJ 2013 L 208, p. 68 and OJ 2013 L 321, p. 6).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Decision ECB/SSM/2016 O2RNE8IBXP4R0TD8PU41/72 of the European Central Bank of 24 August 2016; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Decision ECB/SSM/2016 O2RNE8IBXP4R0TD8PU41/72 of the European Central Bank of 24 August 2016;

| 2. | Orders the ECB to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the ECB to pay the costs;

| 3. | Orders the Republic of Finland to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Republic of Finland to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 6, 9.1.2017.

---
Freedom of Information Act                

        -  Home (current) 
        -  Learn 
        -  Search 
        -  Request 
        -  Contact 

Home » 

----

        Freedom of Information Act                          - Improving FOIA Administration under E.O. 13392
              - Administrative Guidance
The Privacy ActMandatory Declassification ReviewRecords Management              - Records Disposition Schedules
              - The Life of a Document
              - Department of State Major Information Systems
FOIA ReportsFrequently Asked Questions

# FOIA Reports

Downloading Reports

To download a report to your computer, right-click on the desired format and select "Save target as..."

          - Annual Reports
          - Quarterly Reports
          - Chief FOIA Officer Reports

## Annual Reports

In accordance with the Electronic FOIA Amendments of 1996, each federal agency is required to submit annual reports regarding FOIA activities and make these reports electronically available. These reports contain basic information such as how and where to make FOIA requests, program costs, and processing statistics.

## Quarterly Reports

In accordance with the Electronic FOIA Amendments of 1996, each federal agency is required to submit annual reports regarding FOIA activities and make these reports electronically available. These reports contain basic information such as how and where to make FOIA requests, program costs, and processing statistics.
              -                             The number of requests received during the reporting period                        
              -                             The number of requests processed during the reporting period                        
              -                             The number of requests in an agency’s backlog at the end of the reporting period                        
              -                             The progress being made to close the agency’s ten overall oldest pending FOIA requests from the previous Fiscal Year                        

## Chief FOIA Officer Reports

On March 19, 2009, Attorney General Holder issued new FOIA guidelines which called on all agencies to reaffirm the government’s “commitment to accountability and transparency. In accordance with these commitments, the Attorney General directed agency Chief FOIA Officers to review “all aspects of their agencies' FOIA administration” and to report each year to the Department of Justice on the steps taken “to improve FOIA operations and facilitate information disclosure.”

        - Home
        - FOIA Reports
        - Site Map
        - Privacy & Disclaimers
        - Contact
        -  Inspector General (OIG) FOIA                                 
        - FOIA.gov
        - State.gov
        - USA.gov
        - Link to download Acrobat
Document

Exhibit 10.25


SYNOVUS FINANCIAL CORP.
Annual Base Salaries for Named Executive Officers




Set forth below are the base salaries for persons identified as “named executive officers” of Synovus Financial Corp. for the year ended December 31, 2020, as approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors:
															
					
	Name	Title	Base Salary
	 	 	 
	Kessel D. Stelling	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer	$	1,125,000 		
	Kevin S. Blair	President and Chief Operating Officer	695,250 		
	Andrew J. Gregory, Jr.	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer	475,000 		
	Mark G. Holladay	Executive Vice President and Chief Risk Officer	409,902 		
	Robert W. Derrick	Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer	375,000
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Limited Competition: Collaborative Partnership to Advance Global Health Research (U01 Clinical Trial Not Allowed).                    

*Date:*                         November 29, 2023.                    

*Time:*                         11:00 a.m. to 12:30 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G62, Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Eleazar Cohen, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G62, Rockville, MD 20892, (240) 669-5081,                         *ecohen@niaid.nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: November 2, 2023.

Melanie J. Pantoja, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-24633 Filed 11-7-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
# C_2017277EN.01003701.xml

| 21.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 277/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 277/37

---

Judgment of the General Court of 5 July 2017 — Allstate Insurance v EUIPO (DRIVEWISE)

(Case T-3/16) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Application for registration of the EU word mark DRIVEWISE - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - No distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009))

(2017/C 277/54)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Allstate Insurance Company (Northfield, Illinois, United States) (represented by: G. Würtenberger and N. Martzivanou, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral and K. Doherty, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 October 2015 (Case R 956/2015-2), relating to an application for registration of the word sign DRIVEWISE as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The General Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Allstate Insurance Company to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Allstate Insurance Company to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 78, 29.2.2016.

1

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

 

 

FELIX D. WHITTINGTON,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

DONALD VAUGHN, et al.,

 Defendants.

 CIVIL ACTION

 NO. 02-4346

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 17th day of December, 2002, it is hereby ORDERED that the

attached letter shall be filed by the Clerk.

BY THE COURT:

___________________________________

MARVIN KATZ, S.J.

Case 2:02-cv-04346-MK Document 59 Filed 12/17/2002 Page 1 of 1
No. 57635.

#### Sprouse-Reitz Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 100546-K (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of celluloid reindeer similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 56902, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Certification of Nevada Classic Thoroughbreds, Inc.  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  regarding Annual Report on Form 10-KSB  for the year ended June 30, 2005**

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title  18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Nevada Classic  Thoroughbreds, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), doeshereby certify that, based upon her knowledge:

1. The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended    June 30, 2005 (the "Form 10-KSB") fully complies with the    requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. Information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of  the Company.

> 
 

| Dated: July 25, 2005 | By: /s/ Kristin Curtis                                  |
|----------------------|---------------------------------------------------------|
|                 |                                                         |
|                 | Kristin Curtis                                          |
|                 | Chief Accounting Officer/Acting Chief Financial Officer |

>
January 2006 to January 2007 Schedule

For Treasury-Disbursed Recurring Benefit Payments

Settlement Dates

Agency Jan’06 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct 

OPM Office of Personnel Management Civil Service Retirement/Annuity

1/3** 2/1 3/1 4/3** 5/1 6/1 7/3** 8/1 9/1 10/2*

RRB Railroad Retirement Board Railroad Retirement/Annuity

1/3** 2/1 3/1 4/3** 5/1 6/1 7/3** 8/1 9/1 10/2*

VA Department of Veterans Affairs Compensation and Pension

12/30* 2/1 3/1 3/31* 5/1 6/1 6/30* 8/1 9/1 9/29* 

SSA Social Security Administration 3rd of Month

1/3 2/3 3/3 4/3 5/3 6/2* 7/3 8/3 9/1* 10/3 

SSACycle -1 2nd Wednesday

1/11 2/8 3/8 4/12 5/10 6/14 7/12 8/9 9/13 10/11 

SSACycle -2 3rd Wednesday

1/18 2/15 3/15 4/19 5/17 6/21 7/19 8/16 9/20 10/18 

SSACycle -3 4th Wednesday

1/25 2/22 3/22 4/26 5/24 6/28 7/26 8/23 9/27 10/25 

SSI Supplemental Security Income 

12/30* 2/1 3/1 3/31* 5/1 6/1 6/30* 8/1 9/1 9/29* 

. * = Settlement Date is Adjusted to the Preceding Work Day ** = Settlement Date is Adjusted to the Following Work Day Inquiries about this schedule should be directed to 202-874-7138 

Prepared by the U. S. Department of the Treasury/Fina