alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 106 Filed 07/31/2003 Page 1 of 25
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 106 Filed 07/31/2003 Page 2 of 25
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 106 Filed 07/31/2003 Page 3 of 25
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 106 Filed 07/31/2003 Page 4 of 25
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 106 Filed 07/31/2003 Page 5 of 25
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 106 Filed 07/31/2003 Page 6 of 25
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 106 Filed 07/31/2003 Page 7 of 25
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 106 Filed 07/31/2003 Page 8 of 25
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 106 Filed 07/31/2003 Page 9 of 25
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 106 Filed 07/31/2003 Page 10 of 25
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 106 Filed 07/31/2003 Page 11 of 25
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 106 Filed 07/31/2003 Page 12 of 25
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 106 Filed 07/31/2003 Page 13 of 25
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 106 Filed 07/31/2003 Page 14 of 25
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 106 Filed 07/31/2003 Page 15 of 25
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 106 Filed 07/31/2003 Page 16 of 25
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 106 Filed 07/31/2003 Page 17 of 25
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 106 Filed 07/31/2003 Page 18 of 25
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 106 Filed 07/31/2003 Page 19 of 25
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 106 Filed 07/31/2003 Page 20 of 25
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 106 Filed 07/31/2003 Page 21 of 25
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 106 Filed 07/31/2003 Page 22 of 25
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 106 Filed 07/31/2003 Page 23 of 25
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 106 Filed 07/31/2003 Page 24 of 25
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 106 Filed 07/31/2003 Page 25 of 25
EXHIBIT 31.2CertificationsI, Jason Daggett, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Form 10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2005, of AlnilamCorporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report; 4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly duringthe period in which this report is being prepared;  b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and  c. Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case ofan annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting;5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small businessissuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting.Date: December 29, 2005   */s/ Jason Daggett*   Jason Daggett, Treasurer  (Principal Financial Officer)
# C_2016016EN.01004801.xml

| 18.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 16/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 16/48

---

Action brought on 12 November 2015 — Frinsa del Noroeste v OHIM — Frigoríficos Unidos (Frinsa LA CONSERVA)

(Case T-634/15)

(2016/C 016/57)

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Frinsa del Noroeste, SA (Santa Eugenia de Ribeira, Spain) (represented by: J. Botella Reyna, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Frigoríficos Unidos, SA (Riudellots de la Selva, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant for the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word elements ‘FRINSA LA CONSERVA’ — Application for registration No 11 495 728

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before OHIM

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 27 July 2015 in Case R 2382/2014-5

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision. |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Priority rights in respect of the term FRINSA and peaceful coexistence on the market and in the registration of the allegedly conflicting marks. |
| --- | --- |

—

Priority rights in respect of the term FRINSA and peaceful coexistence on the market and in the registration of the allegedly conflicting marks.

| — | Well-known character of the mark FRINSA. |
| --- | --- |

—

Well-known character of the mark FRINSA.

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
<PAGE>   1
                                                                      EXHIBIT 16

                    [STRALEY, ILSLEY & LAMP P.C. LETTERHEAD]


                                 March 29, 2001



Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549

Gentlemen:

We have read Item 8 of Form 10-KSB dated March 30, 2001 of First Federal of
Northern Michigan and we are not in disagreement with the statements as reported
in Item 8 as contained on Page 25 of the above referenced Form 10-KSB therein.

                                   Sincerely,

                                   /s/ Straley, Ilsley & Lamp P.C.

                                   Straley, Ilsley & Lamp P.C.
# C_2017369EN.01001501.xml

| 30.10.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 369/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.10.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 369/15

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 September 2017 — sheepworld v EUIPO (Bester Opa)

(Case T-449/16) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Application for EU word mark Bester Opa - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2017/C 369/21)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: sheepworld AG (Ursensollen, Germany) (represented by: S. von Rüden, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Fischer, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 May 2016 (Case R 92/2016-4) concerning an application for registration of the word sign Bester Opa as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders sheepworld AG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders sheepworld AG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 364, 3.10.2016.

1

---
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**





**Certification
      Pursuant To**


**Section
      906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





The
      undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies
      that:




1.  This
      annual report of FirstFlight, Inc. fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of FirstFlight,
      Inc.


Date: April
                17, 2007
            By:
            /s/
                Keith P. BleierKeith
                P. Bleier,Chief
                Financial and Accounting Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to FirstFlight, Inc. and will be retained
      by
      FirstFlight, Inc., and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or
      its staff upon request.
NO. 07-03-0272-CR

	IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

	FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	AT AMARILLO

	PANEL E

	JUNE 11, 2003

	______________________________

	ROBERT GAIL TALMO,

			Appellant

	v.

	THE STATE OF TEXAS, 

			Appellee

	_________________________________

	FROM THE 47TH DISTRICT COURT OF RANDALL COUNTY;

	NO. 15114; HON. DAVID L. GLEASON, PRESIDING

	_______________________________

	DISMISSAL 

	_______________________________ 

Before QUINN and REAVIS, JJ., and BOYD, S.J.1

	Appellant, Robert Gail Talmo, appeals his conviction for Summary Criminal Direct Contempt of Court.  We dismiss the proceeding for lack of jurisdiction. 

	The Order of Contempt, from which appellant is appealing, indicates that sentence was imposed on April 16, 2003.   Appellant then filed a notice of appeal on June 2, 2003.  No motion for new trial was filed.   

	To be timely, a notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days after the sentence is imposed or suspended in open court or within 90 days after that date if a motion for new trial is filed.  Tex. R. App. P.  26.2(a).  Thus, appellant's notice of appeal was due to be filed on or about May 16, 2003, but was not filed until June 2, 2003.  Furthermore, he did not move for an extension of the deadline.

	A timely filed notice of appeal is essential to invoke our appellate jurisdiction.  Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex. Crim. App. 1996).  If the notice is not timely, then the court of appeals can take no action other than to dismiss the proceeding.  Id. at 523.  Because appellant's notice of appeal was untimely filed, we have no jurisdiction to consider the appeal. 

	Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed. 

							Per Curiam 

Do not publish.
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JOHN GAMMINO,

Plaintiff,

v.

SBC COMMUNICATIONS, INC., et al.

Defendants.

Civil Action No. 03-6686

ORDER

March 25, 2010 Pollak, J.

For reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum, defendant’s motion to

vacate (docket no. 62) and amended motion to vacate (docket no. 64) are DENIED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Louis H. Pollak

Pollak, J.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of North American Insurance Leaders, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/    PAULA S. BUTLERPaula S. Butler Principal Financial Officer


September 28, 2006
No. 52526.

protests 129283-K, etc. (San Francisco).

#### Kohn Bros. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of platinum fox fur skins, undressed, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *O. Brager-Larsen*(36 C. C. P. A. 1, C. A. D. 388). The claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was therefore sustained.
Exhibit 32.2


            CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In  connection  with the Annual  Report on Form 10-KSB of Sunshine  PCS
Corporation  (the "Company") for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Robert
E. Dolan,  as Principal  Accounting  Officer of the Company,  hereby  certifies,
pursuant  to 18  U.S.C.  ss.  1350,  as  adopted  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The  information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.



                                            /s/ Robert E. Dolan
                                            -------------------
                                            Name: Robert E. Dolan
                                            Title: Principal Accounting Officer
Date: March 26, 2008
, 

I:IMSEN H32/40 Page 2/2 

Engine Maintenance General Maintenance Schedule Section No. Rev. 

2!1-t! {lttl ~~NY ~tJ~~~ .JII~ G09100 1C 

Maintenance Guidance for Marine Auxiliary Engine 

Description Overhaul Interval (hours) 

Section • . Flanned Overhaul 

~~ No. + . Confirm after OverhauUNsw ::s 0 Remark (I) 0 0 0 0 0 0 _g c: <.., : Based on observation Q; 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <I> .£: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 

~ . Visual inspection after Overhaul/New 0 o_ 0 0 0 C'i <D- o· t ,; c-i 0 <I> 

~ C'i -v" ,; ~ ~ N N "' N!!! 

Control System -Function Check -- --- --- G40000 Governor Unkage - Function Check • Weekly 

Check Governor Oil Level 

(See Manual for Governor) • Daiy 

G45001 RPM Ack-up- aearance • NJrmal Clearance: 

Safety Device Check 1.0- 2.0 ITITl 

M45200 Terrperature I Fl"essure Switches g 

Fue l system -Inspection ------- G05100 Analyze Od Fl"operties (Sarrple) • 8/ery Bunkering 

Fuel k1jection Purrp 

M51100 - nspect Deflector (Replace if needed) • Max. ife time= 8,000 hours 

- Check Aunger Asselltlly • - 01eck De~very Valve Assen"'bly • 

Fuel k1jection Valve Replace if necessary 

M52000 (Check and Adjust the Opening Pressure) ©I • Maxillllm overhaul 

interval= 2,000 hours 

M56000 Fuel Oil Riter - Clean 0 

Lubricating Oil System 

G06200 Analyze Oil Fl"operties (Sarrple) • l'mnthly 

M61000 Lubricating Oil Purrp • 

M62000 Lubricating Oil Cooler - aean © 

M63000 Lubricating Oil Fdter- aean & Replace © 

When pressure loss 

across f1ker is 1.5bar 

M67000 Centrifugal Fitter - Clean and Replace • l'ronthly 

G60000 Therrrostatic V<Ave- nspection 

(aean & Check the elements) • 

Cooling Water System 

G07100 Analyze Cooling water Fl"operties (Sarrple) • l'mnthly 

M71000 Cooling Water Pun-p • 

G70000 Therrrostatic Valve - nspection • 

Compressed Air System 

002300 Starting Valve for Main & Emergency 

• l'mnthly (Function Check) 

G40000 Check Con-pressed Air System • Weekly 

Air FiHer & Air Vessel-Fl"essure Check • Daily 

M42000 Air Starting V~ve ilspection © 8/ery 24,000hrs running 

Supercharging System 

-- - -- Oean Air Fitter (See Manual for Turbocharger) © 81ery 500hrs running 

M80000 aean Turbine (Water-w ashing) © 81ery 200hrs running 

M80000 aean Con-pressor (Weter-w ashing) © 81ery 24-SOhrs running 

M84000 aean Charge Air Cooler g • * When doing maintenance and overhaul work, seals (o-rings & gaskets, etc.) should be renewed. 

* The overhaul intervals stated above are only for guidance as these depend on the actual service condition, 

the quality of used fuel or lubricating oil, the treatment of cooling water and so on. 

Note) These are not parts of normal maintenance interval, but, the confirmation or visual inspection of 

the specified ones to be carried out after Overhaul/New or Refitting. 

A HYUNDAI HEAVY INDUSTRIES CO., LTD. Engine & Machinery Division 12.04/KGH
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 175-2 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 1 of 21
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 175-2 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 2 of 21
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 175-2 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 3 of 21
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 175-2 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 4 of 21
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 175-2 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 5 of 21
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 175-2 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 6 of 21
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 175-2 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 7 of 21
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 175-2 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 8 of 21
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 175-2 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 9 of 21
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 175-2 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 10 of 21
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 175-2 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 11 of 21
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 175-2 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 12 of 21
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 175-2 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 13 of 21
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 175-2 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 14 of 21
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 175-2 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 15 of 21
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 175-2 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 16 of 21
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 175-2 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 17 of 21
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 175-2 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 18 of 21
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 175-2 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 19 of 21
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 175-2 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 20 of 21
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 175-2 Filed 10/25/2006 Page 21 of 21
No. 59471.

protests 217914-K, etc. (New York).

#### K. Ginsburg, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of opaque white glass stones of different sizes and shapes, faceted, similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 59105, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
***Exhibit 23.1***

 

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS 

 

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-60819) of TECO Capital Trust II ofour report dated March 26, 2004 relating to the financial statements, which appears in this Form 10-K. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated March 2, 2004 relating to the financial statements of TECO Energy, Inc.,which appears in the Annual Report to Shareholders, which is incorporated by reference in the TECO Energy, Inc. Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003. We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report dated March 2, 2004relating to the financial statement schedules, which appears in the TECO Energy, Inc. Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003. 

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

 

Tampa, Florida 

March 26, 2004
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****FY ... performance &accountability report**
 
2002 | 2003-2007(Scroll Down) | 2008-2012(Scroll Down)
 
SuDoc Number: C1.1:
Item Number:0126 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000560602
 
August 7, 2019
DATE OF NOTICE: September 16, 2002

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

THE PHOENIX INSURANCE COMPANY, : CIVIL ACTION.

 vs. :

JOSEPH ORTLIP, ET AL., : NO. 02-4364

NOTICE

 Please be advised that an initial pretrial conference in the

above-captioned case will be held on October 8, 2002 at 11:30 a.m.

before the Honorable Eduardo C. Robreno in Room 7614, U.S.

Courthouse, 60l Market Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

 Attached is an Initial Pretrial Conference Information Report

(the "Report") which you are required to complete and forward to

the Court at least three (3) days prior to the Initial Pretrial

Conference. Do not have the Report docketed. Also attached is a

notice of Agenda of Initial Pretrial Conference. In lieu of each

side submitting a Report, the parties may file a joint report

pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(f).

 If trial counsel in this case is on trial in a Court of record

at the time of the Initial Pretrial Conference, another attorney in

such trial attorney's office, who should be familiar with the case,

is required to appear at the Initial Pretrial Conference. 

 

 Constantine S. Flores 

 Deputy Clerk to Judge Robreno

 (267) 299-7429

cc: Allan Aigeldinger, Esquire

 Christine Celia, Esquire

Case 2:02-cv-04364-ER Document 3 Filed 09/16/2002 Page 1 of 1