alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 53980.

#### Balfour, Guthrie *&*Co., Ltd., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 142886-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
# C_2017221EN.01002701.xml

| 10.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 221/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 221/27

---

Order of the General Court of 3 May 2017 — De Nicola v EIB

(Case T-59/16 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Civil Service - EIB staff - Appraisal - Career evaluation report - Appraisal year 2012 - Errors of law - Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded))

(2017/C 221/37)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Carlo De Nicola (Strassen, Luxembourg) (represented by: G. Ferabecoli, lawyer)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Investment Bank (EIB) (represented by: initially by: G. Nuvoli and F. Martin, and subsequently by: G. Nuvoli and G. Faedo, acting as Agents, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Single Judge) of 18 December 2015, De Nicola v EIB (F-9/14, EU:F:2015:163) seeking to have that judgment set aside in part.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Mr Carlo De Nicola shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Investment Bank (EIB) in the present appeal. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Carlo De Nicola shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Investment Bank (EIB) in the present appeal.

---

(1)  OJ C 111, 29.3.2016.

1

---
No. 66269.

#### John H. Graham Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 60/23073 (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of foot rot secateurs similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 64713, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Conservation briefs, Maine**
 
April 2007
 
SuDoc Number:A 57.81/19-2:
Item Number:0120-A-10 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000563432
 
**Title:****Conservation news, Maine**
 
2006:JanMar
2007:JanJulOct
2008:FebMayAugDec
2009:JunNov
2010:MarJunOct
2011:JanAprAug
2012:JanJunSep
2013:Feb
2014:Dec/JanMayOct
 
SuDoc Number:A 57.81/19-2:
Item Number:0120-A-10 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000563431
 
 
February 18, 2020
# C_2019016EN.01000301.xml

| 14.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 16/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 16/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 6 November 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberverwaltungsgericht Berlin-Brandenburg — Germany) — Sebastian W. Kreuziger v Land Berlin

(Case C-619/16) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Social policy - Organisation of working time - Directive 2003/88/EC - Article 7 - Right to paid annual leave - National legislation providing for the loss of annual leave not taken and of the payment in lieu thereof, where the worker did not submit a request for leave before the termination of the employment relationship))

(2019/C 16/03)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Oberverwaltungsgericht Berlin-Brandenburg

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Sebastian W. Kreuziger

Respondent: Land Berlin

Operative part of the judgment

Article 7 of Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time must be interpreted as precluding national legislation such as that at issue in the main proceedings, in so far as it entails that, in the event that the worker did not ask to exercise his right to paid annual leave prior to the termination of the employment relationship, that worker loses — automatically and without prior verification of whether the employer had in fact enabled him, in particular through the provision of sufficient information, to exercise his right to leave prior to the termination of that relationship — the days of paid annual leave to which he was entitled under EU law on the date of the termination of that relationship, and, accordingly, his right to an allowance in lieu of paid annual leave not taken.

---

(1)  OJ C 38, 6.2.2017.

---
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

February 1, 2012 

p0125 

Order 

 

February 1, 2012 

143565 & (55) 

 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 143565 

 COA: 298375 

Oakland CC: 2009-229465-FH 

JASON DAVID HELLER, 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 19, 2011 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for 

bond pending appeal is DENIED.
# 01front.doc

# 02summ.doc

# 03chap1.doc

# 04chap2.doc

# 05chap3.doc

# 06chap4.doc

# 07chap5.doc

# 08refs.doc

# 09appa.doc

# 10appb.doc

# 11appc.doc

# 12appd.doc

# 13appe.doc

# Files.txt
No. 48439.

#### Protests 96029-K, etc., of Steinhardter & Nordlinger et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Alto Palermo Sociedad Anónima (the company) for the year ended
June 30, 2009 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Alejandro G. Elsztain, as Chief Executive Officer of the company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                            
|----------------------------
|/s/    ALEJANDRO G. ELSZTAIN
|By: Alejandro G. Elsztain   
|Chief Executive Officer     
|                            
|December 30, 2009           

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except as to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
**Exhibit 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in theRegistration Statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-125917) and Form S-8 (No. 333-82012) of ZymoGenetics, Inc. of our report dated February 28, 2007, relating to the financial statements, management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which appear in this Form 10-K. 

PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP 

Seattle, Washington 

February 28, 2007
# C_2018094EN.01003602.xml

| 12.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/36

---

Order of the General Court of 18 January 2018 — Iame v EUIPO — Industrie Aeronautiche Reggiane (Parilla)

(Case T-642/16) (1)

1

(2018/C 094/48)

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 392, 24.10.2016.

1

---
**EXHIBIT 23.1**

**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-102974, 333-58508 and 333-145014) of Nara Bancorp, Inc. of our report dated March 15, 2010, with respect to the consolidatedfinancial statements of Nara Bancorp, Inc. and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which report is incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Nara Bancorp, Inc. for the year endedDecember 31, 2009. 

Crowe Horwath LLP 

Sherman Oaks, California 

March 15, 2010
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE

JERMAINE LASTER § No. 94, 2015

§

Defendant Below-Appellant, § Court Below:

§

v. § Superior Court of the 

§ State of Delaware, in and for

STATE OF DELAWARE, § New Castle County

§

Plaintiff Below-Appellee. § Cr. I.D. No. 1307014887

Submitted: October 14, 2015

Decided: October 15, 2015

Before STRINE, Chief Justice, HOLLAND and VALIHURA, Justices.

O R D E R

This 15th day of October 2015, the Court, having considered this matter on the 

briefs of the parties, has concluded that the same should be affirmed on the basis of and 

for the reasons assigned by the Superior Court in its Order dated June 27, 2014.

NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Order of the 

Superior Court be, and the same hereby is, AFFIRMED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Karen L. Valihura

 Justice
EXHIBIT 32



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Westsphere Asset Corporation, Inc.  (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Douglas MacDonald, President and Principal Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.







Date:  April 21, 2006

By: /s/ Douglas MacDonald

Name: Douglas MacDonald

Title:   President (Principal Executive Officer)
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANTTO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bear Island Paper Company LLC (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June30,2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Edward D. Sherrick, Vice President of Finance [Chief Financial Officer] of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, asadopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|   | (1)    | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               |
|--------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                |
|   | (2)    | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. |

 

|   | By:   /s/ Edward D. Sherrick |
|--------|---------------------------------------------|
|   |                                             |   |
|   | Edward D. Sherrick                          |
|   | Vice President of Finance                   |
|   | (Chief Financial Officer)                   |
|   | August 9, 2002                              |
|   |                                        |
# C_2019044EN.01002701.xml

| 4.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 44/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 44/27

---

Judgment of the General Court of 5 December 2018 — Falcon Technologies International v Commission

(Case T-875/16) (1)

((Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Evaluation report of a notified body within the meaning of the legislation on EC declarations of conformity of medical devices - Refusal of access - Exception relating to protection of commercial interests - Obligation to carry out a specific and individual examination - Overriding public interest - Partial refusal of access))

(2019/C 44/34)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Falcon Technologies International LLC (Ras Al Khaimah, United Arab Emirates) (represented by: R. Sciaudone and G. Arpea, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Baquero Cruz and D. Nardi, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Decision C(2016) 6722 final of 14 October 2016 refusing to grant the applicant access to the document (DG (Santé) 2015-7552.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Commission Decision C(2016) 6722 final of 14 October 2016, in so far as it refused partial access to the document DG (Santé) 2015-7552; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Commission Decision C(2016) 6722 final of 14 October 2016, in so far as it refused partial access to the document DG (Santé) 2015-7552;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders Falcon Technologies International LLC and the European Commission each to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Falcon Technologies International LLC and the European Commission each to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 46, 13.2.2017.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

   PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350)

The undersigned executive officer of First BancTrust Corporation (the
"Registrant") hereby certifies that the Registrant's Form 10-K/A for the year
ended December 31, 2006 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained therein
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Registrant.


                                        /s/ Terry J. Howard
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Name: Terry J. Howard
                                        Title: Chief Executive Officer and
                                               President

Date: January 11, 2008


                                       50
# C_2015320EN.01004201.xml

| 28.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 320/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 320/42

---

Action brought on 3 August 2015 — Indecopi/OHIM — Synergy Group (PISCO)

(Case T-446/15)

(2015/C 320/59)

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Instituto Nacional de Defensa de la Competencia y de la Protección de la Propiedad Intelectual (Indecopi) (San Borja, Peru) (represented by: M. Pomares Caballero and A. Pomares Caballero, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Synergy Group sp. z o.o. (Wrocław, Poland)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Applicant: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant:

Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word element ‘PISCO’ — Application for registration No 1016 7674

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before OHIM

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 June 2015 in Case R 1291/2014-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | alter the contested decision, by declaring that the requirements for the application of the relative ground for refusal laid down in Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009 are met in the present case, or, in the alternative, annul that decision; and |
| --- | --- |

—

alter the contested decision, by declaring that the requirements for the application of the relative ground for refusal laid down in Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009 are met in the present case, or, in the alternative, annul that decision; and

| — | order OHIM to pay its own costs and those of the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay its own costs and those of the applicant.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 23 of Regulation No 110/2008; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 23 of Regulation No 110/2008;

| — | Infringement of Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(4) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
No. 58440.

protests 198309-K, etc. (New York).

#### Astoria Pan Americana, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of ficin powder or *leche de oje en polvo*the same in all material respects as that the subject of *Astoria Pan-Americana, Inc.*v. *United States*(32 Cust. Ct. 243, C. D. 1608), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 57637.

#### Selsi Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 189132-K, etc. (New York).

*308Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise and the issues are the same in all material respects as those the subject of *John P. Herber & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(30 Cust. Ct. 193, C. D. 1519). In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the cited case, the protests were dismissed, and the matters were remanded to a single judge sitting in reappraisement for determination of the value of the merchandise in the manner provided by law (28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d)).
No. 62464.

#### Roger L. Stevens *v.*United States,

protest 324198-K (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

An examination of the official papers showing that the protest was filed more than 60 days after liquidation, the protest was dismissed as untimely, by virtue of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of ZymoGenetics, Inc. (the Company) on Form
10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Bruce L.A. Carter, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S)1350, as
adopted pursuant to (S)906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780 (d)); and

          (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



/s/  Bruce L.A. Carter
-----------------------
Bruce L.A. Carter
Chief Executive Officer
March 25, 2003

A signed original of this writen statement, required by Section 906, has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case 2:05-cv-01650-PBT Document 26 Filed 11/09/05 Page 1 of 9
Case 2:05-cv-01650-PBT Document 26 Filed 11/09/05 Page 2 of 9
Case 2:05-cv-01650-PBT Document 26 Filed 11/09/05 Page 3 of 9
Case 2:05-cv-01650-PBT Document 26 Filed 11/09/05 Page 4 of 9
Case 2:05-cv-01650-PBT Document 26 Filed 11/09/05 Page 5 of 9
Case 2:05-cv-01650-PBT Document 26 Filed 11/09/05 Page 6 of 9
Case 2:05-cv-01650-PBT Document 26 Filed 11/09/05 Page 7 of 9
Case 2:05-cv-01650-PBT Document 26 Filed 11/09/05 Page 8 of 9
Case 2:05-cv-01650-PBT Document 26 Filed 11/09/05 Page 9 of 9
# C_2019187EN.01006401.xml

| 3.6.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 187/64 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.6.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 187/64

---

Judgment of the General Court of 4 April 2019 –Hesse and Wedl & Hofmann v EUIPO (TESTA ROSSA)

(Cases T-910/16 and T 911/16) (1)

(EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU figurative mark TESTA ROSSA - Partial revocation - Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 58(1)(a) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Proof of use - Outward use of the contested mark - Equal treatment)

(2019/C 187/67)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant in Case T-910/16: Kurt Hesse (Nuremberg, Germany) (represented by: M. Krogmann, lawyer)

Applicant in Case T-911/16: Wedl & Hofmann GmbH (Mils, Austria) (represented by: T. Raubal, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by M. Fischer, acting as Agent)

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, interveners before the General Court, respectively in Case T-910/16 and Case T-911/16: Wedl & Hofmann GmbH and Kurt Hesse

Re:

Actions brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 5 October 2016 (Case R 68/2016-1), relating to revocation proceedings between Mr Hesse and Wedl & Hofmann.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Joins Cases T-910/16 and T-911/16 for the purposes of the judgment; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Joins Cases T-910/16 and T-911/16 for the purposes of the judgment;

| 2. | Dismisses the actions; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the actions;

| 3. | Orders Mr Kurt Hesse to pay the costs in Case T-910/16; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Mr Kurt Hesse to pay the costs in Case T-910/16;

| 4. | Orders Wedl & Hofmann GmbH to pay the costs in Case T-911/16. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders Wedl & Hofmann GmbH to pay the costs in Case T-911/16.

---

(1)  OJ C 53, 20.2.2017.

---