### 36511 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 124 / Friday, June 27, 2014 / Notices

interventions in lieu of paper using the ‘‘eFiling’’ link at http://www.ferc.gov. Persons unable to file electronically should submit an original and 5 copies of the protest or intervention to the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE., Washington, DC
20426.

This filing is accessible on-line at http://www.ferc.gov, using the ‘‘eLibrary’’ link and is available for review in the Commission’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. There is an ‘‘eSubscription’’ link on the Web site that enables subscribers to receive email notification when a document is added to a subscribed docket(s). For assistance with any FERC Online service, please email FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov, or call (866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502–8659.

Comment Date: 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on July 21, 2014.

Dated: June 20, 2014. Kimberly D. Bose, Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2014–15080 Filed 6–26–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6717–01–P**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** 

**[ER–FRL–9015–6]**

**Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability** 

Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General Information (202)
564–7146 or http://www.epa.gov/ compliance/nepa/

. Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact

Statements Filed 06/16/2014 Through 06/20/2014 Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

Notice: Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make public its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA’s comment letters on EISs are available at: http:// www.epa.gov/compliance/nepa/ eisdata.html

. EIS No. 20140177, Final EIS, NRCS, UT,

Green River Diversion Rehabilitation Project, Review Period Ends: 07/28/ 2014, Contact: David Brown 801–524–
4551. EIS No. 20140178, Final EIS, FERC, TX,

Freeport LNG Liquefaction Project and Phase II Modification Project, Review Period Ends: 07/28/2014, Contact: Eric Tomasi 202–502–8097. EIS No. 20140179, Final EIS, USFS, CA,

Sugarloaf Hazardous Fuels Reduction, Review Period Ends: 07/28/2014, Contact: Carol Spinos 530–534–6500. EIS No. 20140180, Draft EIS, NPS, CA,

Sequoia and Kings Canyon National Parks Wilderness Stewardship Plan, Comment Period Ends: 08/25/2014, Contact: Nancy Hendricks 559–565–
3102. EIS No. 20140181, Draft Supplement,

BR, ND, Northwest Area Water Supply Project, Comment Period Ends: 08/11/2014, Contact: Alicia Waters 701–221–1206. EIS No. 20140182, Final EIS, DOI, 00,

PROGRAMMATIC—Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill: Phase III Early Restoration Plan, Review Period Ends: 07/28/2014, Contact: Nanciann Regalado 404–679–4161.
Dated: June 24, 2014. Dawn Roberts, Management Analyst, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2014–15160 Filed 6–26–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P**

**ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY** 

**[EPA–HQ–OPPT–2010–0173; FRL–9912–63]**

**Request for Nominations of Scientific Peer Reviewers for EPA’s Approach**  **for Estimating Exposures and Incremental Health Effects From Lead**  **During Renovation, Repair, and Painting Activities in Public and**  **Commercial Buildings**

**AGENCY :**  Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

**ACTION :**  Notice.

**SUMMARY :**  EPA invites the public to nominate scientific experts to be considered as peer reviewers for the draft document entitled, ‘‘Approach for Estimating Exposures and Incremental Health Effects from Lead During Renovation, Repair, and Painting Activities in Public and Commercial Buildings’’ (Technical Approach Document). A nominee, if selected, will assess the accuracy, content, and interpretation of findings of the Technical Approach Document, ensuring that they are factual and scientifically sound. The peer review will assure the Agency of the soundness of the technical approach.

**DATES :**  The nomination period begins on June 27, 2014 and ends on July 18, 2014.

**ADDRESSES :**  Submit the nominations, identified by docket ID number EPA– HQ–OPPT–2010–0173. In addition, the nomination, must include the nominee’s full name, address, affiliation, telephone number, email address, and a statement on the nominee’s expertise. Use one of the following submission methods:

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: http:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute.

• Mail: Document Control Office (7407M), Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT), Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001.

• Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand delivery or delivery of boxed information, please follow the instructions at http:// www.epa.gov/dockets/contacts.html. Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along with more information about dockets generally, is available at http://www.epa.gov/ dockets.

**FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT :** 

For technical information contact: Stan Barone, Jr., Risk Assessment Division (7403M), Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone number (202) 564–1169; email address: barone.stan@epa.gov.

For general information contact: The TSCA-Hotline, ABVI-Goodwill, 422 South Clinton Ave., Rochester, NY 14620; telephone number: (202) 554– 1404; email address: TSCA-Hotline@
epa.gov.

**SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION :** 
I. General Information A. Does this action apply to me?

You may be potentially affected by this action if you are in environmental and human health; independent contractors and contracting companies involved in renovation, repair, and painting; members of the public interested in the assessment of chemical risks. The following list of North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) codes is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a guide to help readers determine whether this document applies to them. Potentially affected entities may include:

• Building construction (NAICS code 236).

• Specialty trade contractors (NAICS code 238).

• Real estate (NAICS code 531).

• Other general governmental support (NAICS code 921). B. What should I consider as I prepare my nominations for EPA?

When submitting a nomination, remember to:


### 36512 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 124 / Friday, June 27, 2014 / Notices

i. Identify the nomination by docket ID number and other identifying information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number).

ii. Follow directions. The Agency may ask you to respond to specific questions.

iii. Explain as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of profanity or personal threats.

iv. Make sure to submit your nomination by the deadline identified. II. Background

The work described in the Technical Approach Document is being performed as part of EPA’s continuing comprehensive approach to assess and manage risk from lead contamination in painted surfaces under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), Subtitle IV (15 U.S.C. 2681 et seq. ), and specifically to identify lead-based paint hazards created by renovation, repair and painting (RRP) activities in public and commercial buildings (P&CBs), under TSCA section 403. The focus of the Technical Approach Document is to assess the U.S. population’s exposure and incremental health effects from renovation and repair activities in P&CBs. EPA published a Federal Register notice on May 30, 2014 (79 FR 31072) (FRL–9910–44) that described an approach under consideration for identifying and evaluating hazards in P&CBs. Estimates of incremental health effect changes associated with exposure to lead in the modeled renovation scenarios in the Technical Approach Document will be used by the Agency as we consider how to identify and evaluate hazards, and make a hazard finding as required by TSCA. EPA plans to publish the Technical Approach Document with a presentation of results in the docket and announce its availability in the Federal Register later this calendar year.

The EPA’s Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics (OPPT) has identified the Technical Approach Document as an influential product and according to Agency peer review guidance is required to conduct an external peer review of that document, supplemental files, appendices, and attendant models used for exposure scenarios. The reviewers are asked to assess the accuracy, content, and interpretation of findings ensuring that they are factual and scientifically sound. The review shall generate comments from the individual expert reviewers. III. Expertise Sought

Any interested person or organization may nominate him or herself or any qualified individual in the areas of the expertise described in this unit. Peer reviewers should have demonstrated expertise in one or more of the following areas:

1. Multimedia routes of human exposure to lead. Includes knowledge of measurement methods and observed environmental concentrations for multimedia human exposure pathways (relevant concentrations for various sources: Soil, dust, drinking water, food, and lead-based paint).

2. Modeling of multimedia human
exposures. Includes, modeling of multimedia human exposure uptake/ absorption of lead to predict internal biokinetic distribution (blood/bone lead burdens).

3. Lead exposure pathway
assessment. Expertise in the physical and chemical properties of lead and the biogeochemical processes involved in the pathways involved in human exposure to lead. These pathways include:

i. Air (both direct inhalation and deposition to surfaces likely to be contacted by humans).

ii. Soil/dust ingestion.
4. Lead uptake/absorption. Expertise in the processes of uptake or absorption of lead in the digestive tract and lungs, including knowledge of digestive processes that affect the form of lead thus making it more (or less) available for absorption. Experience on the fate of inhaled particles is also desirable, including olfactory uptake.

5. Internal biokinetic distribution and physiological effects of lead. Expertise on the physiological processes that determine the distribution of absorbed lead among the various organs and tissues of the human body. This would include expertise on the mechanisms of transport within the human body, the organs and tissues that accumulate significant amounts of lead, the concentrations at the organ/tissue level that might impair physiological processes, and the residence times (or other measures of potential impact) of lead in these tissues and organs. In addition, expertise on the various mechanisms and routes of elimination and the mechanisms of this elimination is desirable.

6. Tissue concentrations of lead. Includes expertise on measurement methods and observed concentrations for various biological tissues, including blood, teeth, and bone lead concentrations and lead levels in soft tissues such as brain, kidney, etc.

7. Human growth and activity patterns. Expertise on growth patterns and typical human activity patterns from prenatal to elderly, including recreational, occupational, leisure, and household activities. This would include knowledge of published data and of modeling applications.

8. Exposure assessment modeling. Expertise and experience in measuring human population exposure to lead and/or in modeling human exposure to ambient and indoor pollutants. Expertise in relating indicators of human exposure to potential health outcomes and quantification of risk related to adverse health outcomes.

9. Lead-induced health effects. Experience in using statistical methods such as Cox regression for modeling concentration response data from epidemiologic/clinical evaluation of lead-induced effects on:

i. Neurological development and other neurological endpoints.

ii. Cardiovascular function. iii. Renal effects. iv. Developmental toxicity.
10. Risk assessment and uncertainty characterization. Expertise in human health risk assessment for lead or other pollutants causing non-cancer and cancer health effects, including Bayesian statistical approaches and biostatistics. Expertise in designing uncertainty characterization frameworks for complex multi-media health assessments involving use of physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models, empirical data, micro environmental exposure modeling, and concentration-response functions drawing on both toxicological and epidemiological data. Specific areas of expertise should include probabilistic methods and Bayesian techniques.

IV. Peer Panel Selection Criteria

Selection criteria for individuals nominated to serve as external peer reviewers include the following:

1. Demonstrated expertise through relevant peer reviewed publications.

2. Professional accomplishments and recognition by professional societies.

3. Demonstrated ability to work constructively and effectively in a committee setting.

4. Absence of financial conflicts of interest.

5. No actual conflicts of interest or the appearance of lack of impartiality.

6. Skills working on committees and advisory panels.

7. Background and experiences that would contribute to the diversity of viewpoints on the panel, e.g., workforce sector; geographical location; social, cultural, and educational backgrounds; and professional affiliations.

8. Willingness to commit adequate time for the thorough review of the draft external peer review document in July– September 2014 (exact date to be determined).


### 36513 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 124 / Friday, June 27, 2014 / Notices

9. Availability to participate in-person in a 2-day peer review meeting in the Washington, DC metro area in August or September 2014 (exact date will be published in the Federal Register at least 30 days prior to the external peer review meeting).

Further information regarding the external peer review meeting will be announced at a later date in the Federal Register

. V. Peer Panel Selection Process

EPA’s contractor will notify candidates of selection or non-selection. EPA’s contractor will follow-up with nominees and request additional information such as:

1. The disciplinary and specific areas of expertise of the nominee.

2. The nominee’s curriculum vita. 3. A biographical sketch of the nominee indicating current position; educational background; past and current research activities; recent service on other advisory committees, peer review panels, editorial boards, or professional organizations; sources of recent grant and/or contract support; and other comments on the relevance of the nominee’s expertise to this peer review topic.

EPA’s contractor may also conduct an independent search for candidates to assemble a balanced group representing the expertise needed to fully evaluate EPA’s draft documents. EPA’s contractor will consider and screen all candidates against the criteria listed in Unit III. and the Agency’s Conflict of Interest (COI) and appearance of bias guidance (http://www.epa.gov/ peerreview/pdfs/spc

_

peer

_rvw

_ handbook

_addendum.pdf and http://www.epa.gov/osa/pdfs/epa-process-forcontractor.pdf ). Following the screening process, EPA’s contractor will narrow the list of potential reviewers. Prior to selecting the final peer reviewers, a second Federal Register notice will be published to solicit comments on the interim list of 12–15 candidates. The public will be requested to provide relevant information or documentation on the nominees that EPA’s contractor should consider in evaluating the candidates within 21 days following the announcement of the interim candidates. Once the public comments on the interim list of candidates have been reviewed, EPA’s contractor will select the final peer reviewers who, collectively, best provide expertise spanning the multiple areas listed Unit III. and, to the extent feasible, best provide a balance of perspectives. Compensation of non-Federal peer reviewers will be provided by EPA’s
contractor. List of Subjects

Environmental protection, Business and industry, Commercial buildings, Renovation, Risk assessment, Lead.

Dated: June 20, 2014. Jeff Morris, Acting Director, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics.
[FR Doc. 2014–15123 Filed 6–26–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6560–50–P FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE**  **CORPORATION**

**Update to Notice of Financial Institutions for Which the Federal**  **Deposit Insurance Corporation Has Been Appointed Either Receiver,**  **Liquidator, or Manager**

**AGENCY :**  Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

**ACTION :**  Update Listing of Financial Institutions in Liquidation.

**SUMMARY :**  Notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (Corporation) has been appointed the sole receiver for the following financial institutions effective as of the Date Closed as indicated in the listing. This list (as updated from time to time in the Federal Register) may be relied upon as ‘‘of record’’ notice that the Corporation has been appointed receiver for purposes of the statement of policy published in the July 2, 1992 issue of the Federal Register (57 FR 29491). For further information concerning the identification of any institutions which have been placed in liquidation, please visit the Corporation Web site at www.fdic.gov/bank/ individual/failed/banklist.html or contact the Manager of Receivership Oversight in the appropriate service
center.

Dated: June 23, 2014. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Pamela Johnson, Regulatory Editing Specialist.



### I NSTITUTIONS IN 

### L IQUIDATION [In alphabetical order]

FDIC Ref. No. Bank name City State Date closed

10501 .................................................. Valley Bank .................................................... Fort Laud erdale ... FL ......................... 6/20/2014 10502 .................................................. Valley Bank .................................................... Moline ... ............... IL .......................... 6/20/2014

[FR Doc. 2014–15069 Filed 6–26–14; 8:45 am]

**BILLING CODE 6741–01–P**

**GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION** 

**[Notice–CECANF–2014–03; Docket No. 2014–0005; Sequence No. 3]** 

**Commission To Eliminate Child Abuse and Neglect Fatalities; Announcement**  **of Meeting**

**AGENCY :**  Commission To Eliminate Child Abuse and Neglect Fatalities, GSA.

**ACTION :**  Meeting notice. **SUMMARY :**  The Commission to Eliminate Child Abuse and Neglect Fatalities (CECANF), a Federal Advisory Committee established by the Protect Our Kids Act of 2012, Public Law 112– 275, will hold a meeting open to the public on Thursday, July 10, 2014 in Tampa, Florida.

**DATES :**  The meeting will be held on Thursday, July 10, 2014, from 8:00 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. Eastern Time.

**ADDRESSES :**  CECANF will convene its meeting at the Children’s Board of Hillsborough County, 1002 East Palm Avenue, Tampa, FL 33605. This site is accessible to individuals with disabilities. The meeting will also be made available via teleconference. Access information for people who are hearing impaired will be provided upon request. Please indicate your request in your online registration.

Submit comments identified by ‘‘Notice–CECANF–2014–03’’, by any of the following methods:

• Regulations.gov: http:// www.regulations.gov

.

Submit comments via the Federal eRulemaking portal by searching for ‘‘Notice–CECANF–2014–03’’. Select the link ‘‘Comment Now’’ that corresponds with ‘‘Notice–CECANF–2014–03’’. Follow the instructions provided at screen. Please include your name,