alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the annual report of BW Acquisition, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Roger E. Pawson, Chief Executive Officer
(or equivalent thereof) and Chief Financial Officer (or equivalent thereof)
of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my
knowledge and belief:

      (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


                              /s/ David Funderburk
                              -------------------------
                              David Funderburk
                              Chief Financial Officer (or equivalent thereof)
                              January 5, 2005
|   | (1) | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and |
|--------|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | (2) | The      information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|--------|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                      |                                                                                                                     |
|---------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:      April 14, 2010 | By:/s/ Douglas Mac DonaldName:      Douglas Mac DonaldTitle:      Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive  Officer) |
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MARA FLAMM : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. :

:

SARNER & ASSOCIATES, P.C.; JOSHUA SARNER; : NO. 02-4302

LEONARD SARNER, ESQUIRE; :

JODI H. BROWN, M.D.; JOHN MATUSAVAGE; :

JOHN DOE PROCESS SERVER, INDIVIDUALLY AND :

AS AGENT FOR SARNER 7 ASSOCIATES, P.C.; :

JOSHUA SARNER, ESQUIRE; LEONARD SARNER, :

ESQUIRE; AND JODI H. BROWN, M.D. :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 4th day of January, 2006, it is hereby ORDERED that aTelephone Status

Conference is scheduled for January 20, 2005, at 2:00 p.m. to discuss a trial schedule and to

explore the possibility of a resolution of this matter. Defendants’ counsel shall initiate this

conference call to (215) 597-6079.

BY THE COURT:

 

M. FAITH ANGELL

CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 81 Filed 01/05/2006 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 99.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bear Island Paper Company LLC (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Peter
M. Brant, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.


                                          By:  /s/ Peter M. Brant
                                          Peter M. Brant
                                          Chief Executive Officer
                                          May 12, 2003



This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to ss. 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.
18 of the Securities Act of 1934, as amended.
No. 50886.

#### Protests 99575-K, etc., of P. Silverman & Son (Portland, Maine).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise are the same in all material respects as those passed upon in Abstract 50611, which held discarded paper-mill felts, unfit for further use in the manufacture of paper and having no commercial value except for the recovery of their component wool fibers by processing to a fibrous condition known as wool shoddy, to be classifiable; as wool rags. In accordance therewith the claim at 9 cents per pound under paragraph 1105, as amended, was sustained.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ALBERT A. YOUNG, : CIVIL ACTION

Petitioner, :

: NO. 04-3846

v. :

:

DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, et al., :

Respondents. :

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Petitioner has filed 12 objections to the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate

Judge M. Faith Angell. Each objection is essentially a restatement of the basis of petitioner’s claims

for relief in his habeas corpus petition. 

 Each claim in that petition has been carefully, and in my opinion, correctly addressed

by the Magistrate Judge in her thorough 38-page Report and Recommendation.

Petitioner has also failed to make any substantial showing of the denial of any

constitutional right.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED and DISMISSED

without an evidentiary hearing.

3. There is no basis for the issuance of a certificate of appealability, since there

has been no substantial showing of the denial of any constitutional right.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 7 day of May, 2009. th

BY THE COURT:

 s/ Ronald L. Buckwalter 

 RONALD L. BUCKWALTER, S. J. 

Case 2:04-cv-03846-RB Document 22 Filed 05/08/09 Page 1 of 1
# C_2017078EN.01001102.xml

| 13.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 78/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 78/11

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší soud České republiky (Czech Republic) lodged on 19 December 2016 — Jitka Svobodová v Česká republika — Okresní soud v Náchodě

(Case C-653/16)

(2017/C 078/16)

Language of the case: Czech

Referring court

Referring court

Nejvyšší soud České republiky

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Jitka Svobodová

Applicant:

Defendant: Česká republika — Okresní soud v Náchodě

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Does the Czech legislation under which judges are not entitled to remuneration for on-call duty, even though other employees (in the public and private sectors) are entitled to that remuneration on the basis of the Zákoník práce (Labour Code) or other provisions of law, constitute unequal treatment in the field of pay, prohibited by Council Directive 2000/78/EC? (1) |
| --- | --- |

1.

Does the Czech legislation under which judges are not entitled to remuneration for on-call duty, even though other employees (in the public and private sectors) are entitled to that remuneration on the basis of the Zákoník práce (Labour Code) or other provisions of law, constitute unequal treatment in the field of pay, prohibited by Council Directive 2000/78/EC? (1)

1

| 2. | Does the Czech legislation under which all judges (according to the number of years credited) are entitled to the same salary, even though all of them perform a different number of hours of on-call duty, constitute unequal treatment in the field of pay, prohibited by Council Directive 2000/78/EC? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Does the Czech legislation under which all judges (according to the number of years credited) are entitled to the same salary, even though all of them perform a different number of hours of on-call duty, constitute unequal treatment in the field of pay, prohibited by Council Directive 2000/78/EC?

---

(1)  Council Directive 2000/78/EC of 27 November 2000 establishing a general framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation (OJ 2000 L 303, p. 16).

1

---
IPAC Operational Metrics for June 2023

- Sheet1
No. 56951.

#### Transcontinental Seed, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 161753-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of bird’s-foot trefoil seed *(Lotus*corniculatus) similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Transcontinental Seed, Inc. (Alltransport, Incorporated)*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 163, C. D. 1462), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 48432.

#### Protests 89706-K, etc., of International Harvest Hat Co. et al. (St. Louis, etc.).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
February 1, 1952

No. 56340.

protest 164355-K.

#### Stoffel & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Plaintiff’s application for rehearing granted.
Exhibit 32(ii)

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the annual report on Form 10-KSB of Dialog Group,  Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  the  undersigned,
Vincent  DeCrescenzo,  Sr., the Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,  hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, that:

      (1) the Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: August 12, 2005                    /s/ Vincent DeCrescenzo
                                          -----------------------
                                          Vincent DeCrescenzo, Sr. CFO
Exhibit 32.1


                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  each of the  undersigned  officers  of  EcoSystem
Corporation (the "Company"), certifies that:

1.   The Annual  Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended  December
     31, 2004 (the  "Report")  fully complies with the  requirements  of Section
     13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.  78m or
     78o(d)); and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                 /S/      GLEN COURTRIGHT
                 ------------------------------------
                          GLEN COURTRIGHT
                          Chief Executive Officer
Dated:                    April 15, 2009

                 /S/      JACQUELINE FLYNN
                 -------------------------------------
                          JACQUELINE FLYNN
                          Chief Financial Officer
Dated:                    April 15, 2009

This  certification  is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C.  Section  1350,
subject  to the  knowledge  standard  contained  therein,  and not for any other
purpose.
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 99(b)

                       AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPORATION
                          ANNUAL COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE



     I, John Weisickle, do hereby certify that I am the Vice President/Finance
of American Honda Finance Corporation, a California corporation (the "Company"),
and further certify on behalf of the Company in its capacity as servicer (the
"Servicer") under the Sale and Servicing Agreement (the "Agreement") dated as of
October 1, 2000 among the Servicer, American Honda Receivables Corp., as Seller,
Bankers Trust (Delaware), as Owner Trustee of Honda Auto Receivables 2000-1
Owner Trust and U.S. Bank National Association as Indenture Trustee as follows:

          (i) A review of the activities of the Servicer during the twelve month
     period ended March 31, 2003, and of its performance under the Agreement has
     been made under my supervision;

          (ii) To the best of my knowledge and information, based upon such
     review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement
     throughout such period; and

          (iii) To the best of my knowledge and information, no Event of Default
     nor any event which with the giving of notice or lapse of time, or both,
     would become an Event of Default under the Agreement, has occurred or is
     continuing.

     This certificate is being delivered to the Trustee pursuant to Section 3.11
of the Sale and Servicing Agreement effective October 1, 2000, which terms and
conditions are incorporated in the Agreement.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 19th day of May, 2003.



/s/ John I. Weisickle
-----------------------
Name:  J. I. Weisickle
Title: Vice President/Finance
##### 



AMENDED AND RESTATED
SEVERANCE AND CHANGE IN CONTROL AGREEMENT
 Amended and Restated Severance and Change in Control Agreement Agreement Effective Date Anadys Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Company Mary
Yaroshevsky-Glanville Executive Parties Party
 Recitals
 Whereas
 Whereas
 Whereas
 Now, Therefore ,
 Agreement
 1. Employment.
 1.1 Loyalty; At Will Employment.
 1.2 Termination of Obligations.
 1.




---



##### 



1.3
 2. Definitions.
  2.1 Cause.  Cause 
 (i)
 (ii)
 (iii)
 (iv) Proprietary
Information and Inventions Agreement
 2.2 Change in Control. Change in Control
 (i)
 2.




---



##### 



(ii)
 (iii)
 2.3 Complete Disability.  Complete Disability   Complete
Disability 
 2.4 Good Reason.  Good Reason 
 3.




---



##### 



(i)
 (ii)
 (iii)
 (iv)
 2.5 Integration
 3. Compensation Upon Termination.
 3.1 Death Or Complete Disability.
 3.2 With Cause or Without Good Reason.
 3.3 Without Cause or for Good Reason. Release
 4.




---



##### 



(i) Base Salary
 (ii) COBRA provided, however,
 (iii)
 (iv)
 5.




---



##### 



3.4 Additional Change in Control Related Severance Benefits.
 (i) Bonus Payment 100% Bonus Opportunity
Amount
 (ii)
 4. Tax Compliance
 4.1 Application of Internal Revenue Code Section 409A.
 4.2 Parachute Payment. Payment Excise Tax Reduced Amount
 6.




---



##### 



provided, however,
   5. Company Property.
 6. Other Terminations.
 7.




---



##### 



7. Acknowledgement.
 8. General.
 In Witness Whereof
 Anadys Pharmaceuticals, Inc.By:
    

    /s/ Stephen WorlandIts:  President and Chief Executive OfficerDated:
    
    March 3, 2008Executive:/s/ Mary Yaroshevsky-GlanvilleMary Yaroshevsky-GlanvilleDated:
    
    March 3, 2008 8.




---



##### 



EXHIBIT A
 RELEASE AND WAIVER OF CLAIMS
 Anadys Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Company Release and Waiver
 ADEA
 A general release does not extend to claims which the creditor does not
know or suspect to exist in his or her favor at the time of executing the release, which if known
by him or her must have materially affected his or her settlement with the debtor.
 9.




---



##### 



Date:
    
    
    

    By: 10.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-18-00636-CV

JIMIE DIANNE OWSLEY

v.

BRIAN LEON OWSLEY

On Appeal from the

319th District Court of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2014-FAM-1876-G

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged 

against appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

November 10, 2022
# C_2018161EN.01004702.xml

| 7.5.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 161/47 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.5.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 161/47

---

Judgment of the General Court of 20 March 2018 — Šroubárna Ždánice v Council

(Case T-442/16) (1)

1

((Application for repayment of anti-dumping duties - Imports of certain iron or steel fasteners originating in China or consigned from Malaysia - Regulation (EC) No 91/2009 and Implementing Regulation (EU) No 723/2011 - Jurisdiction of the national court - Lack of jurisdiction of the General Court))

(2018/C 161/52)

Language of the case: Czech

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Šroubárna Ždánice a.s. (Kyjov, Czech Republic) (represented by: M. Osladil, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: H. Marcos Fraile and A. Westerhof Löfflerová, acting as Agents, and N. Tuominen, lawyer)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and P. Němečková, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application for repayment of the anti-dumping duties, with interest, that the applicant claims to have wrongfully paid to the customs authorities of the Czech Republic following the adoption of Council Regulation (EC) No 91/2009 of 26 January 2009 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain iron or steel fasteners originating in the People’s Republic of China (OJ 2009 L 29, p. 1), of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 723/2011 of 18 July 2011 extending the definitive anti-dumping duty imposed by Regulation No 91/2007 on imports of certain iron or steel fasteners originating in the People’s Republic of China to imports of certain iron or steel fasteners consigned from Malaysia, whether declared as originating in Malaysia or not (OJ 2011 L 194, p. 6), and of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 924/2012 of 4 October 2012 amending Regulation No 91/2009 (OJ 2012 L 275, p. 1).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action on the ground of the Court’s lack of jurisdiction to hear and determine it; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action on the ground of the Court’s lack of jurisdiction to hear and determine it;

| 2. | Orders Šroubárna Ždánice a.s. to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Šroubárna Ždánice a.s. to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 392, 24.10.2016.

1

---
Exhibit 31.2

        Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of the Principal Accounting Officer

I, Robert E. Dolan, certify that:

1.  I  have  reviewed  this  Annual  Report  on  Form  10-KSB  of  Sunshine  PCS
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     (a)  Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c)  Disclosed  in this  report  any  change in the  registrant's  internal
control over financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's  fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual  report)  that  has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely  to
materially affect, the registrant's  internal control over financial  reporting;
and

     5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,  to the
registrant's  auditors  and the audit  committee  of the  registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a) All significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

     (b) Any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: March 31, 2005


/s/ Robert E. Dolan
-------------------
Robert E. Dolan
Principal Accounting Officer
# C_2016145EN.01001701.xml

| 25.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 145/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 145/17

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny (Poland) lodged on 22 January 2016 — Minister Finansów v Posnania Investment SA

(Case C-36/16)

(2016/C 145/21)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Referring court

Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Minister Finansów

Appellant:

Respondent: Posnania Investment SA

Respondent:

Question referred

Question referred

Does the transfer of ownership of land (tangible property) by a person taxable for VAT purposes to: (a) the State Treasury — in settlement of tax arrears in respect of taxes constituting State budget revenues; or (b) a municipality, district or regional authority — in settlement of tax arrears in respect of taxes constituting their budget revenues, resulting in the discharge of tax liabilities, constitute a transaction that is subject to tax (supply of goods for consideration) within the meaning of Article 2(1)(a) and Article 14(1) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax? (1)

1

---

(1)  OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1.

1

---