alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Attachment1_fireproof - exemption - request_extension - 2015 - 07 - 30.doc Page 1 of 2



### SENSENICH WOOD PROPELLER CO., INC . AREA CODE 813 PHONE - 752 - 3711 FAX - 752 - 2818 2008 WOOD COURT PLANT CITY,FL USA

33563 See us on the Web @ www.sensenich.com July 30, 2015 U.S. Dept. of Transport ation Docket Operations, M - 30 West Building ground floor, Room W12 - 140 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE. Washington, DC 2059 0 Dear Sirs, Sensenich Wood Propeller Company, Inc. requests an extension for exemption from Title 14 CFR Part 45.11 b (fire proof ma rkings for TCed products). This Exemption was first granted June 29, 2001 under Exemption No. 7559, Regulatory Docket No. FAA 2000 - 8498 , extended on September 2, 2004 under Exemption No. 8394 , extended on December 8, 2008 under Exemption 9800 , and extende d on August 29, 2013 under Exemption 9800A . Since the original petition remains essentially valid, Sensenich Wood Propeller Co. requests an extension for Petition No. 7559 with one additional Type Certificate added to the exemption
. The re are no chang es to the original petition. Two documents support the original Petition for Exemption:

- document for original petition application, dated 11 - 16 - 00, A ttachment2_ fireproof exemption - r4. pdf

- fax of additional comments to original petition, dated 3 - 3 - 01, Attachment3_ faa firepro of - magruder - 030101 - f. pdfAttachment1_fireproof - exemption - request_extension - 2015 - 07 - 30.doc Page 2 of 2

It was discovered after the 2008 exemption that Sensenich Type Certificate P27NE was not included on the list of exempted wooden propeller type certificates. Since this type certificate also pertains to Sensenich fixed pitch w ooden propellers, Sensenich believes it should be added to the exempted list of type certificates. Sensenich is requesting again that all our active wooden propeller Type Certificates be included under this exemption, including TCDS P - 170, TC P27NE, and TC P00001NY. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Please contact me with any questions. Sincerely,
Steve Boser Engineering Manager
```

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 68 (Friday, April 8, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Page 19752]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-8481]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

Sunshine Act Meeting Notice

TIME AND DATE: Wednesday, April 13, 2011; 11 a.m.--12 Noon

PLACE: Room 410, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, Bethesda, 
Maryland.

STATUS: Closed to the public.

Matter To Be Considered

Compliance Status Report

    The Commission staff will brief the Commission on the status of 
compliance matters.
    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-7948.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

    Dated: April 5, 2011.
Todd A Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2011-8481 Filed 4-6-11; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
```
# C_2017309EN.01001001.xml

| 18.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 309/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.9.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 309/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 26 July 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein oikeus — Finland) — Hannele Hälvä, Sari Naukkarinen, Pirjo Paajanen, Satu Piik v SOS-Lapsikylä ry

(Case C-175/16) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 2003/88/EC - Article 17 - Protection of the safety and health of workers - Organisation of working time - Additional payments - Child protection association - ‘Children’s village parents’ - Temporary absence of ‘foster parents’ - Workers employed as ‘relief parents’ - Definition))

(2017/C 309/12)

Language of the case: Finnish

Referring court

Referring court

Korkein oikeus

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Hannele Hälvä, Sari Naukkarinen, Pirjo Paajanen, Satu Piik

Applicants:

Defendant: SOS-Lapsikylä ry

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 17(1) of Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time must be interpreted as meaning that it cannot apply to paid work, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which consists in caring for children in a family-like environment, relieving the person principally responsible for that task, where it is not established that the working time as a whole is not measured or predetermined or it may be determined by the worker himself, which is for the national court to ascertain.

---

(1)  OJ C 191, 30.5.2016.

1

---
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

               STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
               SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

     The undersigned, Dwayne Powell, is the President and Chief Executive
Officer of Pocahontas Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company").

     This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the
Company of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30, 2003 (the "Report").

     By execution of this statement, I certify that:

         A) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or
            78o(d)) and

         B) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company as of the dates and for the periods covered by the
            Report.

     This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so
     that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is
     filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 906
     of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not
     intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the
     Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

August 14, 2003                                         /s/ Dwayne Powell
--------------------                                    ------------------------
Dated                                                       Dwayne Powell

                                       28
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1304 

To amend part B of title XVIII of the Social Security Act to exclude 

customary prompt pay discounts from manufacturers to wholesalers from 

the average sales price for drugs and biologicals under Medicare, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 7, 2017 

Mr. ROBERTS (for himself, Ms. STABENOW, Mr. BROWN, and Mr. CASEY) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance 

A BILL 

To amend part B of title XVIII of the Social Security 

Act to exclude customary prompt pay discounts from 

manufacturers to wholesalers from the average sales 

price for drugs and biologicals under Medicare, and for 

other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1304 IS

1 SECTION 1. EXCLUDING CUSTOMARY PROMPT PAY DIS2 COUNTS FROM MANUFACTURERS TO WHOLE3 SALERS FROM THE AVERAGE SALES PRICE 

4 FOR MEDICARE PAYMENTS FOR DRUGS AND 

5 BIOLOGICALS. 

6 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 1847A(c)(3) of the Social 

7 Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395w–3a(c)(3)) is amended— 

8 (1) in the first sentence, by inserting ‘‘(other 

9 than customary prompt pay discounts extended to 

10 wholesalers)’’ after ‘‘prompt pay discounts’’; and 

11 (2) in the second sentence, by inserting ‘‘(other 

12 than customary prompt pay discounts extended to 

13 wholesalers)’’ after ‘‘other price concessions’’. 

14 (b) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

15 this section shall apply to the calculation of the average 

16 sales price for calendar quarters beginning more than 90 

17 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       4,014,321
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                1,972,686
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             6,753,302
<PP&E>                                      96,355,069
<DEPRECIATION>                              42,296,203
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             143,418,701
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       14,694,670
<BONDS>                                    100,000,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                (44,715,969)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               143,418,701
<SALES>                                     14,840,009
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            14,840,009
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                8,582,346
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             4,806,548
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           4,411,080
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (2,959,965)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (2,959,965)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

                    Notice is hereby given of a change in the meeting of the Sickle Cell Disease Advisory Committee, January 29, 2024, 10:00 a.m. to January 29, 2024, 3:00 p.m., National Institutes of Health, Rockledge I, 6705 Rockledge Drive, Bethesda, MD 20892 which was published in the                     **Federal Register**                     on September 28, 2023, FR Doc 2023-21315, 88 FR 67324.                

                    This Notice is being amended to update the Registration Link. The event is free and open to the public; however, registration is required. Please use this included link to register:                     *https://nih.zoomgov.com/​webinar/​register/​WN_​X-5kA5CJQG6Qmk_​ujQsqAw.*

Dated: November 7, 2023.

Melanie J. Pantoja, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-24962 Filed 11-9-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeal of -- )

)

JAAAT Technical Services, LLC )

)

)

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Mr. Rick B. Barnhill

 Administrator 

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Michael P. Goodman, Esq.

 Engineer Chief Trial Attorney

Laura J. Arnett, Esq.

Allie E. Vandivier, Esq.

 Engineer Trial Attorneys

 U.S. Army Engineer District, Savannah

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal is dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: March 19, 2020

JOHN J. THRASHER

Administrative Judge

Chairman

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed 

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA No. 61381, Appeal of JAAAT Technical 

Services, LLC, rendered in conformance with the Board’s Charter.

Dated: 

PAULLA K. GATES-LEWIS 

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals

ASBCA No. 61381

Under Contract No. W912HN-10-D-0063
No. 66266.

#### Riviera Trading Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 60/25821 (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, O. J.

The protest was dismissed.
No. 53971.

#### Stevens Nelson Paper Corp. *v.*United States,

protests 139175-K and 145001-K (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

By virtue of the decision in *United States*v. *American Viscose Corporation*(30 C. C. P. A. 240, C. A. D. 239), the protests were dismissed.
**Exhibit
      99.8**




CONSENT
        OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS
 
 We
        hereby consent to the use of our name in the Annual Report on Form 40-F (the
        "Annual Report") of Enerplus Resources Fund (the "Registrant"). We hereby
        further consent to the inclusion in the Annual Report of the Registrant's
        Annual
        Information Form dated March 7, 2006 for the year ended December 31, 2005
        which
        document makes reference to our firm and our report entitled "Appraisal Report
        as of December 31, 2005 on Certain Properties Owned by Lyco Energy Corporation",
        dated January 23, 2006, evaluating the Registrant's oil, natural gas and
        natural
        gas liquids interests effective December 31, 2005.
 
 Calgary,
                  Alberta, Canada
                March
                  7, 2006
              DEGOLYER
                  AND MACNAUGHTON
                
                **/**s/
                  Paul J. Szatkowski
                Paul
                  J. Szatkowski, P.E.
                Senior
                  Vice President
**Exhibit31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONS**

I, F. Duffield Meyercord, certify that:

 

1.  I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form10–Q of National Equipment Services, Inc.;

 

2.  Based on my knowledge, this quarterly reportdoes not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state amaterial fact necessary in order to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading withrespect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

 

3.  Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report,fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this quarterly report;

 

4.  The registrant’s other certifying officersand I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a–14 and15d–14) for the registrant and we have:

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is beingprepared;

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented within this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recentfiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;

 

5.  The registrant’s other certifying officersand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlsover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunction):

 

a)  all significant deficiencies in the design oroperation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarizeand report financial informatin and have identified for the registrant’sauditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

 

b)  any fraud, whetheror not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal controls over financialreporting.

 
| Date:  April 8, 2004       |   |
|---------------------------------|--------|
|                            |   |
| /s/ F. DUFFIELD MEYERCORD       |   |
|                            |
| F. Duffield Meyercord           |
| Interim Chief Executive Officer |

 

20

----
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofAXT, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter endedSeptember 30, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Philip C. S. Yin, Chief Executive Officerof the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adoptedpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 906”),that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Dated: November 9, 2006 |   | By:    |   | /s/ Philip C. S. Yin    |
|------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|                         |   |   |   | Philip C. S. Yin        |
|                         |   |   |   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

THE CHESTER COUNTY HOSPITAL : CIVIL ACTION

:

V. :

:

INDEPENDENCE BLUE CROSS :

ET AL : NO. 02-2746

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 2nd day of October, 2003, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 

Defendants’ Motion to Compel Phoenixville Hospital to Produce Documents (Doc. No. 138) is

referred to United States Magistrate Judge Charles B. Smith for resolution.

 

BY THE COURT:

 

JOHN R. PADOVA, J.

Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 141 Filed 10/02/2003 Page 1 of 1
**  
United States District Court for theDistrict of Columbia
United States of America *v.* Microsoft Corporation,C.A. 98-1232
State of New York, *ex rel.* Eliot Spitzer, *et al.*, *v.* Microsoft Corporation, C.A. 98-1233

**Memorandum and Order****June 7, 2000** **Final Judgment****June 7, 2000** 
***Conclusions of Law and Order*** in this case, issued on           April 3, 2000 are available at http://usvms.gpo.gov/conclusions_index.html.

***Findings of Fact*** in this case, issued on November 5, 1999 are available at http://usvms.gpo.gov/findings_index.html.

A service of the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office.Questions or comments: gpoaccess@gpo.gov.

 

**
# & Memorandu m

U. & Departmen t o f ''--.nTMr'N T O F Transportatio n v'-SrORTATiO H Offic e o f th e Secretar

y' ",;;i_ l OPERATiOi ' o f Transportatio n ' ' R 2 b A l| : 5 R Subject : Notic e of

Communication ir

i Docket r ' Date: Marc h26 , 201 2 DOT-OST-OST-2000-718 2 Application o

f U S Airways , Inc
. fo

r a n Exemption (Washington Reaga

n Nationa l Airport-Jackson-Me Wile y Evers Intemationa^ilport , Missi|(flJ)pi ^

From : Secretar

y Ra y LaHoo J i ^ nWilMin i Repl y t o

- ^ ^ —»M_> a m Attn , of : To : Chief , Dockets Ii \accordanc e wit h Departmen t rule s (1 4 CF

RPar t 300) , I a mreportin g th e followin g communication
. O n Marc h 22,2012 , durin g atelephon e conversatio n wit hGoverno r Phi l Bryan t o f Mississippi , th e Governo r raise dth e subjec t

o f th e Department' s proceedin g t o reallocat e tw o with-i n perimete r slo t exemption s for operation s betwee n Ronal dReaga n Washingto n Nationa l Airpor t (DCA ) an dasmall , mediu mo r

non-hu b airport
. Th e Governo r emphasize dth e importanc e o

f maintainin g nonsto p servic e betwee n Jackson , Mississipp i an dDCA , notin g tha t

U S Airway s ha dfile da n applicatio n proposin g t o continu e tha t

service
. Th e Governo r

als o inquire da s t o whe n th e Departmen t

migh t issu e afinal decisio n i n it s proceeding
. I informe dth e Governo r

that , whil e I appreciate dhi s interes t i n thi s case , I coul dno t commen t

o n it s merit s becaus e th e proceedin g wa s unde r activ e consideratio n b y th e Department
. I als o informe dth e Governo r tha t I expecte dtha t

th e Departmen t

woul darmounc e it s decisio n late r thi s Spring
. Pleas e plac e thi s memorandu mi n th e appropriat e Docket
.

cc : Governo r

Phi l Bryan t
E-Signature Guidance

Last Updated 09/08/2022

For certain documents submitted in a company’s annual, quarterly, and/or application filings, the Surety 

Bond Branch requires proper signature and notarization. Notarizations may be wet or electronic, as 

permitted by each state. Signatures may be wet (including scanned copies of wet signatures) or 

electronic. Electronic signatures must meet the following conditions to be considered valid:

• Consent to do business electronically — All parties must agree to conduct transactions 

electronically, either explicitly or implied.

• Intent to sign — E-signatures are only valid if the signer intended to sign.

• Association of signature with the record — Signers must make a visible mark or statement on 

the e-document.

• Attribution — Whether a name or a unique mark, the signature must be attributable to the 

person signing and only linked to them. The context and circumstances under which the 

document was signed can indicate the attribution of an electronic signature. Proper attribution 

provides an audit trail including but not limited to elements such as timestamps, IP address, etc.

• Record retention — Signed electronic documents must be saved, viewed, or printed by either 

party and stored for future reference.

Electronic signatures not meeting the above conditions will not be accepted by the Surety Bond 

Branch. Please note that “cut and paste” signature images and formatted text alone will not be 

acceptable.

Please see examples of acceptable electronic signatures below. 
Example 1:

Example 2:
Please see examples of unacceptable electronic signatures below:

Example 1:

Signature: _______ ____________________________

Example 2: 

Signature: _________ ___________________________