alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1052 Referred in House (RFH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1052

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             August 4, 2017

            Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To strengthen the use of patient-experience data within the benefit-
               risk framework for approval of new drugs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Better Empowerment Now to Enhance 
Framework and Improve Treatments Act of 2017'' or the ``BENEFIT Act of 
2017''.

SEC. 2. STRENGTHENING THE USE PATIENT-EXPERIENCE DATA WITHIN BENEFIT-
              RISK FRAMEWORK.

    Section 569C of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 
360bbb-8c) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(1)--
                    (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``; and'' and 
                inserting a semicolon;
                    (B) in subparagraph (B), by striking the period and 
                inserting ``; and''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(C) as part of the risk-benefit assessment 
                framework in the new drug approval process described in 
                section 505(d), considering relevant patient-focused 
                drug development data, such as data from patient 
                preference studies (benefit-risk), patient reported 
                outcome data, or patient experience data, developed by 
                the sponsor of an application or another party.''; and
            (2) in subsection (b)(1). by inserting ``, including a 
        description of how such data and information were considered in 
        the risk benefit assessment described in section 505(d)'' 
        before the period.

            Passed the Senate August 3, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                JULIE E. ADAMS,

                                                             Secretary.
```
Exhibit
32.2






CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In
connection with the Annual Report of E-Debit Global Corporation, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Kim
Law, Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:




(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and








(2)
            The
      information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





Date:
      April 14, 2010
            By:
      /s/ Kim
      Law
              Name:
      Kim Law
              Title:
      Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial
  Officer
| Tennessee HomeAbout UsNewsProgramsTechnical ResourcesPartnershipsContact Us  |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| SearchTennesseeAll NRCS SitesNRCS, FSA & RD forNews- National NRCS News
- Newsletters
- Success Stories
- Upcoming Events
- Publications
- Annual                     Reports
- Find a Service Center
- Southeast Region

Annual Reports
 

FY-2003 Annual Report

< Back to ...

 
 Back to Top  **Tennessee NRCS Home**  | 		Site Map  | 		Contact  | 		Accessibility  | 		NRCS  | 		USDA |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**CertificationPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofAXT, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Philip C. S. Yin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), that, to the best of myknowledge:

 

(1)          The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities andExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

 

(2)          The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: May 6, 2005 |   | By:    | /s/ Philip C. S. Yin    |
|--------------------|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|               |   |   | Philip C. S. Yin        |
|               |   |   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification of Nevada Classic Thoroughbreds, Inc.  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  regarding Annual Report on Form 10-KSB  for the year ended June 30, 2013**

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title  18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Nevada Classic  Thoroughbreds, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), doeshereby certify that, based upon his knowledge:

1. The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended    June 30, 2013 (the "Form 10-KSB") fully complies with the    requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. Information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of  the Company.

> 
 

| Dated: September 30, 2013 | By: /s/ Brad Brimhall   |
|---------------------------|-------------------------|
|                      |                         |
|                      | Brad Brimhall           |
|                      | Chief Executive Officer |

>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

SHEET METAL WORKERS :

LOCAL 441 HEALTH & WELFARE :

PLAN, et al, :

Plaintiffs : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. : NO. 04-5898

:

GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC, et al, :

Defendants :

O R D E R

STENGEL, J.

AND NOW, this 7th day of September, 2010, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that upon

consideration of Defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ second amended class action

complaint (Document #249), plaintiffs’ response thereto (Document # 252) and defendants’ reply

to plaintiffs’ response (Document # 256), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion is

GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as follows:

1. The motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ antitrust claims under the laws of the following

states is GRANTED: California, New York.

2. The motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ antitrust claims under the laws of the following

states is DENIED: Arizona, Florida (as moot), Massachusetts (as moot),

Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, North Carolina, West Virginia, Wisconsin.

3. The motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ consumer protection claims under the laws of

the following states is GRANTED: Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Massachusetts,

Michigan, Nevada, New York, Oklahoma, Rhode Island.
4. The motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ consumer protection claims under the laws of

the following states is DENIED: Arkansas, California, Florida, Minnesota,

Missouri, North Carolina, Pennsylvania.

5. The motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ unjust enrichment claims under the laws of the

following states is GRANTED: Alabama, Arkansas, California, Colorado,

Florida, Georgia, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, New York,

Oklahoma, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Texas.

6. The motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ unjust enrichment claims under the laws of the

following states is DENIED: Iowa, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota,

Missouri, Nevada, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, West Virginia, Wisconsin.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Lawrence F. Stengel 

LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J.
854098.25.01 10/18/02 9:24 AM

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

KEVIN WALSH and REGINA WALSH :

: CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-4181

Plaintiffs, :

:

v. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION;

BAYER AG;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE;

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM

:

:

:

:

:

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

:

Defendants. :

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of the Court:

Kindly enter the appearances of Hope S. Freiwald, Aline Fairweather, Erin

Brennan and Kirstin J. Miller as attorneys for defendant SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a

GlaxoSmithKline.

Respectfully Submitted,

_____________________________ _____________________________

Hope S. Freiwald Aline Fairweather

_____________________________ _____________________________

Erin Brennan Kirstin J. Miller

DECHERT PRICE & RHOADS

4000 Bell Atlantic Tower

1717 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2793

(215) 994-4000

Case 2:02-cv-04181-LDD Document 11 Filed 10/21/2002 Page 1 of 1
No. 57943.

protests 74495-K, etc. (Baltimore) .

#### S. S. Kresge Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

It was stipulated that the items marked “A” or “C” consist of figures and articles, composed wholly or in chief value of papier máehé, the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 56975, and that the items marked “B” or “D” consist of articles, composed wholly or in chief value of wood, the same in all material respects (except the component *435material of chief value) as the merchandise involved in said Abstract 56975. On the agreed facts and following the cited case, the items marked “A” or “G” were held dutiable at 25 percent under paragraph 1403 as manufactures of papier máché, not specially provided for, and the items marked “B” or “D” at 33% percent under paragraph 412, as manufactures, composed wholly or in chief value of wood, not specially provided for.
No. 48431.

#### Protests 23792-K, etc., of Grand Gaslight, Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 24 Filed 02/20/2004 Page 1 of 9
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 24 Filed 02/20/2004 Page 2 of 9
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 24 Filed 02/20/2004 Page 3 of 9
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 24 Filed 02/20/2004 Page 4 of 9
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 24 Filed 02/20/2004 Page 5 of 9
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 24 Filed 02/20/2004 Page 6 of 9
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 24 Filed 02/20/2004 Page 7 of 9
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 24 Filed 02/20/2004 Page 8 of 9
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 24 Filed 02/20/2004 Page 9 of 9
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 102 

Note 11. Accounts Payable 

Accounts Payable as of September 30, 2023, and 2022 

(In billions of dollars) 2023 2022 

Department of Defense 44.0 37.4 

Security Assistance Accounts 16.9 17.5 

Department of the Treasury 8.6 8.4 

General Services Administration 6.9 6.3 

Department of Energy 6.2 5.1 

Department of Agriculture 4.3 2.5 

Department of Veterans Affairs 4.3 5.0 

Department of Education 3.9 4.5 

Department of Homeland Security 3.2 3.2 

Department of State 3.1 2.9 

U.S. Agency for International Development 3.1 3.1 

Department of Justice 2.8 2.7 

U.S. Postal Service 2.3 2.3 

All other 14.6 13.7 

 Total accounts payable 124.2 114.6 

Accounts payable includes amounts due for goods and property ordered and received, services rendered by other than 

federal employees, cancelled appropriations for which the U.S. government has contractual commitments for payment, and 

non-debt related interest payable.
### OIRA has concluded EO 12866 review of Reconsideration of the 2008 Ozone NAAQS King, Heidi R. to: Thomas Gillis, Mancini, Dominic J., John Hannon, Karen Martin, Lydia Wegman, Susan Stone, Tricia Crabtree, Ron Evans, Kathy Kaufman 01/06/2010 10:00 AM

Thank you all for your work on this rule. OIRA has concluded review under EO 12866. Best regards, Heidi
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In Re: WELLBUTRIN SR : CIVIL ACTION NO. 04-5525

ANTITRUST LITIGATION :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 24th day of August, 2011, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that a 

hearing on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Approval of Direct Purchaser Class 

Settlement will be held on Monday, August 29, 2011 at 11:00 a.m. in courtroom 3B, U.S. 

Courthouse, 601 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA. 

BY THE COURT:

_/s/ Lawrence F. Stengel________________

LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J.

Case 2:04-cv-05525-LS Document 406 Filed 08/24/11 Page 1 of 1
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

ACI TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,

Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

UNITED STATES, PENNSYLVANIA STATE 

UNIVERSITY,

Defendants-Appellees

______________________ 

2022-1966

______________________ 

Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims 

in No. 1:21-cv-02340-ZNS, Judge Zachary N. Somers.

______________________ 

JUDGMENT

______________________ 

JONATHAN DAVID SHAFFER, Haynes and Boone, LLP, 

Tysons Corner, VA, argued for plaintiff-appellant. Also 

represented by TODD MATTHEW GARLAND, Smith, Pachter, 

McWhorter, PLC. Tysons Corner, VA. 

 STEVEN MICHAEL MAGER, Commercial Litigation 

Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee

United States. Also represented by BRIAN M. BOYNTON,

ERIC P. BRUSKIN, PATRICIA M. MCCARTHY. 

Case: 22-1966 Document: 65 Page: 1 Filed: 09/08/2023
 ROBERT CHARLES RUTHERFORD, JR., The Pennsylvania 

State University, State College, PA, for defendant-appellee 

The Pennsylvania State University. 

 ______________________ 

THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (MOORE, Chief Judge, REYNA and 

TARANTO, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT 

 

September 8, 2023 

Date

/s/ Jarrett B. Perlow

Jarrett B. Perlow

Clerk of Court

Case: 22-1966 Document: 65 Page: 2 Filed: 09/08/2023
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AXT, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Morris S. Young,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Section 906), that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

|                |  |                                                              | 
|--------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------ | 
|August 12, 2003 |  |                                                              | 
|                |  |                                                              | 
|                |  | /s/ Morris S. Young

Morris S. Young
Chief Executive Officer | 

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to [name of issuer] and
will be retained by [name of issuer] and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2019072EN.01002002.xml

| 25.2.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 72/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.2.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 72/20

---

Judgment of the General Court of 6 December 2018 — Vans v EUIPO — Deichmann (V)

(Case T-817/16) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark V - Earlier international figurative mark V - Proof of the existence, validity and scope of the protection of an earlier trade mark - Rule 19(2)(a)(ii) of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 (now Article 7(2)(a)(ii) of Delegated Regulation (EU) 2018/625) - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)))

(2019/C 72/25)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Vans, Inc. (Cypress, California, United States) (represented by: M. Hirsch, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented initially by: S. Hanne, subsequently by: A. Söder and D. Hanf, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervening before the General Court: Deichmann SE (Essen, Germany) (represented by: C. Onken, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 19 September 2016 (Case R 2030/2015-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Deichmann and Vans.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Vans, Inc. to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Vans, Inc. to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 22, 23.1.2017.

---
##### 



WESTERN RESERVE BANCORP, INC.
FORM 10-QSB
Quarter ended March 31, 2006
 CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Western Reserve Bancorp, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;4.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e) for the small business issuer and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
the period in which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most
recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers
auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over
financial reporting.
 Date: May 11, 2006
    
    /s/ Edward J. McKeonEdward J. McKeon, President and CEO
 Page 37
Before the First Division,

April 3, 1958

No. 61763.

#### E. Leitz, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 309237-K (New York).

*505Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of parts of cameras, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.