alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OFTEXAS 

AUSTIN 

GWLD c. MANN /- April 15, 1939 

*mm .**U*L 

Honorable B. A. Hodges 

County Auditor v b+idvNv 

Georgetown, Texas 4)"' 

Dear Sir: i. 

we are in reok&pt 0r 

in you request our oplnlo 

for the oonsolldatlon of 

out 0r the generel,mnd 

tewmos fuuds ar’the dia 

d to’ you on Januai-y 87, 

Statutes w& expreresd 

an eledtion r0r' sahool. 

uld’ be paid’ their oam~ 

general Suud, In ‘that 

penaes ‘incurred ln sone paid’ put oi. the Wallto such districts for the 

ation is held, or out of funds. 

tnert ensuing flseal pear, ” .~ 

the genera fund ‘of the’~oouuty. On the 

k740b Revised Civil Statutes enaated in 

.in itb terms and ‘providea’ that wall expenses 

,atlon with or inoidental to any sob001 dlstriot eleotlouv shall be paid out of the available maintenance 

fund belonging to the distriot holdiug the eleOtiOIl, 

Our answar to your question, therefore, is that all of the 

espenees whiah may be lnodrred in oouneatlon with the election 

which you mention should be paid out of the available maiutenauos 

fund of the respective districts holding the elections. 

Yours very truly
Exhibit
      23.2








**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**





We
      hereby
      consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement Nos.
      333-127820 and 333-138339 on Form S-8 of our report dated February 16, 2006,
      relating to the financial statements of Bio Solutions Manufacturing, Inc.,
      which
      appear in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Bio Solutions Manufacturing,
      Inc.
      for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2005.








/s/
      Baum & Company, P.A.





Baum
      & Company, P.A.


Coral
      Springs, Florida








March
      22,
      2007
# C_2019035EN.01001802.xml

| 28.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 35/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 35/18

---

Judgment of the General Court of 21 November 2018 — HM v Commission

(Case T-587/16) (1)

((Civil service - Officials - Recruitment - Competition notice EPSO/AST-SC/03/15 - Refusal to allow participation in the assessment tests - Request for review - Refusal to forward that request to the selection board for the open competition on the grounds that it was out of time - Division of competences between EPSO and the competition selection board))

(2019/C 35/22)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: HM (represented by: H. Tettenborn, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: T. Bohr and G. Gattinara, agents)

Re:

Application on the basis of Article 270 TFEU seeking the annulment, first, of the decision of the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) dated 17 August 2015 not to take into account the request for review of the decision of the selection board not to allow the applicant to participate in the next stage of Competition EPSO/AST-SC/03/15-3 and, secondly, of the ‘implied decision’ of the selection board not to grant that request.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) dated 17 August 2015 not to take into account the request for review of the decision of the selection board not to allow HM to participate in the next stage of Competition EPSO/AST-SC/03/15-3; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) dated 17 August 2015 not to take into account the request for review of the decision of the selection board not to allow HM to participate in the next stage of Competition EPSO/AST-SC/03/15-3;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 191, 30.5.2016 (Case initially registered before the European Union Civil Service Tribunal under number F-17/16 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1 September 2016).

---
### C OURT OF 

### A PPEALS FOR THE



### F IRST 

### D ISTRICT OF 

### T EXAS AT 

### H OUSTON



### O RDER ON 

### M OTION

Cause number: 01

- 1 4

- 00 707

- CV

Style: Marinecorp International, LTD

.

v. The Chopper Group, LLC, ET Al.

Date motion filed * : September 15, 201 5

Type of motion: Motion to R einstate

Party filing motion: Appellant

Document to be filed:

Is appeal acceler ated? No

If motion to extend time:

Original due date:

Number of previous extensions granted: Current Due date:

Date Requested:

Ordered that motion is:

 Granted

If document is to be filed, document due:

 T he Cou rt will not grant additional motions to extend time absent extraordinary circumstances

 Denied

 Dismissed ( e.g. , want of jurisdiction, moot )

 Other: _____________________________________

Appellant’s motion is granted. The Court reinstates this appeal on t he Court’s active docket. Appellant’s

brief is ordered to be filed within 30 days of this order. Appellee’s brief, if any, is ordered to be filed

within 30 days of the date the appellant’s brief is filed. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6(b).

Judge's signature: /s/ Chief Justice Sherry Radack



Panel consists of

____________________________________________

Date: October 6, 2015
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ROBERT CAMM, et al. : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. :

:

AMERICAN GENERAL LIFE INS. CO. : NO. 02-4201

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of February, 2003, it is HEREBY

ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement

is DISMISSED AS MOOT.

BY THE COURT:

 

DIANE M. WELSH

U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

copy faxed 2/5/03 to

Robert E.J. Curran, Esq.

Brian J. Seleyo, Esq.

Stephen C. Baker, Esq.

Case 2:02-cv-04201-AB Document 11 Filed 02/05/2003 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

_____________

No. 16-3470, 16-3552, 16-3867 & 16-3868

_____________

IN RE: PETITION OF FRESCATI SHIPPING COMPANY, LTD.,

AS OWNER OF THE M/T ATHOS I and TSAKOS SHIPPING 

& TRADING, S.A., AS MANAGER OF THE ATHOS I 

FOR EXONERATION FROM OR LIMITATION OF LIABILITY

(E.D. Pa. No. 2-05-cv-00305)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

CITGO ASPHALT REFINING COMPANY; 

CITGO PETROLEUM CORPORATION; 

CITGO EAST COAST CORPORATION

(E.D. Pa. No. 2-08-cv-02898)

CITGO Asphalt Refining Company; 

CITGO Petroleum Corporation;

CITGO East Coast Oil Corporation,

Appellants in Nos. 16-3470; 16-3552

Frescati Shipping Company, Ltd.; 

Tsakos Shipping and Trading, S.A.,

Appellants in No. 16-3867

United States of America

Appellant in No. 16-3868

_____________

On Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

District Court Nos. 2-05-cv-00305; 2-08-cv-02898

District Judge: The Honorable Joel H. Slomsky

Case: 16-3470 Document: 003112950376 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/07/2018
2

Argued November 8, 2017

Before: SMITH, Chief Judge, HARDIMAN,

Circuit Judge, and BRANN, District Judge*

________________

JUDGMENT

________________

This cause came on to be considered on the record from the United States 

District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania and was argued on November 

8, 2017.

On consideration whereof, it is now hereby ORDERED and ADJUDGED by 

this Court that the judgment of the District Court dated August 17, 2016 is 

AFFIRMED IN PART, VACATED IN PART, and REVERSED IN PART. The 

District Court’s judgment in favor of Frescati on the breach of contract claim and 

the prejudgment interest award is AFFIRMED. The District Court’s judgment in 

favor of Frescati on the negligence claim is VACATED. The District Court’s 

judgment in favor of the United States is AFFIRMED IN PART with respect to 

CARCO’s liability on the subrogated breach of contract claim, but the judgment is

REVERSED and REMANDED for further proceedings in light of our equitable 

 

*The Honorable Matthew W. Brann, United States District Judge for the Middle 

District of Pennsylvania, sitting by designation.

Case: 16-3470 Document: 003112950376 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/07/2018
3

recoupment ruling for the purpose of recalculating damages and prejudgment 

interest. The District Court’s order dated April 9, 2015, denying CARCO’s motion 

for partial summary judgment on its limitation of liability defense, is AFFIRMED.

The parties shall bear their own costs.

Attest:

s/ Patricia S. Dodszuweit

Clerk

DATED: March 29, 2018

Case: 16-3470 Document: 003112950376 Page: 3 Date Filed: 06/07/2018
Before the First Division,

December 13, 1961

No. 66272.

#### John L. Westland & Son, Inc., a/c Pacific Instruments Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 59/22127, etc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of recording tapes similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Electric & Musical Industries (US), Ltd.*v. *United States*(42 Cust. Ct. 87, C.D. 2070), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
| 1. | The Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the “Report”) of Saker Aviation Services, Inc. fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of Saker Aviation Services, Inc. |
|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:          March 29, 2011 | By:   | /s/ Ronald J. Ricciardi                               |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------|-------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                            |            | Ronald J. Ricciardi                                   |
|                                                                            |            | President and Chief Executive Officer                 |
|                                                                            |            | (principal executive and principal financial officer) |

----
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS4738 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
# C_2016335EN.01005401.xml

| 12.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 335/54 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 335/54

---

Action brought on 12 July 2016 — ZZ v Commission

(Case F-36/16)

(2016/C 335/70)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: N. de Montigny and J.-N. Louis, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision not to promote the applicant to grade AST 7 in the 2015 annual promotions exercise.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the decision of 13 November 2015 publishing the list of officials promoted in the 2015 annual promotions exercise in so far as it does not contain the applicant’s name; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of 13 November 2015 publishing the list of officials promoted in the 2015 annual promotions exercise in so far as it does not contain the applicant’s name;

| — | Order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Commission to pay the costs.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EMILIO and RITA BERUMEN :

: CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-CV-4238

Plaintiffs, :

:

v. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION;

BAYER AG;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE;

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM

:

:

:

:

:

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

:

Defendants. :

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of the Court:

Kindly enter the appearances of Hope S. Freiwald, Aline Fairweather, Erin

Brennan and Kirstin J. Miller as attorneys for defendant SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a

GlaxoSmithKline.

Respectfully Submitted,

_____________________________ _____________________________

Hope S. Freiwald Aline Fairweather

_____________________________ _____________________________

Erin Brennan Kirstin J. Miller

DECHERT PRICE & RHOADS

4000 Bell Atlantic Tower

1717 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2793

(215) 994-4000

Case 2:02-cv-04238-AB Document 7 Filed 09/16/2002 Page 1 of 1
# C_2016462EN.01002301.xml

| 12.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 462/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 462/23

---

Judgment of the General Court of 27 October 2016 — Caffè Nero Group v EUIPO (CAFFÈ NERO)

(Case T-37/16) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Application for the EU figurative mark CAFFÈ NERO - Absolute grounds for refusal - No distinctive character - Descriptiveness - Mark of such a nature as to deceive the public - Article 7(1)(b), (c) and (g) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2016/C 462/29)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Caffè Nero Group Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: L. Cassidy, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Rajh, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 6 November 2015 (Case R 954/2015-1), relating to the application for registration of the figurative sign CAFFÈ NERO as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Caffè Nero Group Ltd to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Caffè Nero Group Ltd to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 106, 21.3.2016.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM INTERIM
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS AT JUNE 30 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                            <C>                  <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                  6-MOS                6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-1998         DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                         JAN-01-1998         JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                           JUN-30-1998         JUN-30-1997
<CASH>                                   4,806,036                   0
<SECURITIES>                                     0                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                            5,328,734                   0
<ALLOWANCES>                               102,149                   0
<INVENTORY>                              6,879,294                   0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                        17,224,668                   0
<PP&E>                                   4,408,309                   0
<DEPRECIATION>                           2,239,707                   0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          20,109,640                   0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                   10,610,809                   0
<BONDS>                                          0                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0                   0
<PREFERRED>                                      0                   0
<COMMON>                                 4,306,778                   0
<OTHER-SE>                               1,742,138                   0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>            20,109,640                   0
<SALES>                                 10,751,465          10,958,637
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                        10,751,465          10,958,637
<CGS>                                    6,302,625           6,959,616
<TOTAL-COSTS>                            2,874,711           3,163,994
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 0                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            19,204            (56,334)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         220,553             134,708
<INCOME-PRETAX>                          1,334,373             756,653
<INCOME-TAX>                               537,539             302,064
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        796,833             454,589
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0                   0
<CHANGES>                                        0                   0
<NET-INCOME>                               796,833             454,589
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                 0.31                0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  .22                0.12
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

KRISTEN M. LEONARD : CIVIL ACTION

:

 v. :

 : NO. 02-cv-4156

MONTGOMERY INSURANCE SERVICES :

O R D E R

AND NOW, TO WIT: This 7th day of October, 2003,

it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above action has been settled

and upon Order of the Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1(b) of the Local Rules of

Civil Procedure of this Court , it is

ORDERED that the above action is DISMISSED with prejudice, pursuant to

agreement of counsel without costs.

MICHAEL E. KUNZ, Clerk of Court

BY: 

Lynn Meyer 

 Deputy Clerk

cc: Ronda O’Donnell, Esq. (fax)

William McLaughlin, Esq. (fax)

O:\41(b) Orders to Dismiss\Leonard v. Mont. Ins. 02-4156 - 41b Order.wpd

Case 2:02-cv-04156-MMB Document 13 Filed 10/07/2003 Page 1 of 1
No. 56345.

protests 608273-G, etc. (New York).

#### L. P. Henryson & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

The protests were dismissed.
No. 48426.

#### Protests 950594-G, etc., of I. F. Roncallo et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Integrated
Healthcare Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30,
2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company at the dates and for the period indicated

      This Certificate has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.


                                      INTEGRATED HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS, INC.

Dated: August 20, 2007                By:  /s/ Bruce Mogel
                                           ------------------------------
                                           Bruce Mogel
                                           Chief Executive Officer
### Geophysical framework of the southwestern Nevada volcanic field and hydrogeologic implications

By: V. J. Grauch**David A. SawyerChris J. FridrichMark R. Hudson**

                            https://doi.org/10.3133/pp1608

#### Links

- More information:  **USGS Index Page**                            (html)
-                                                                                                                             Document:                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  **Report**                                                                                                     (pdf)                                                                                                                                     
- Download citation as:  RIS                         |                         Dublin                            Core

#### Abstract

Part or all of this report is presented in Portable Document Format                        (PDF). For best results viewing and printing PDF documents, it is recommended that you download                        the documents to your computer and open them with Adobe Reader. PDF documents opened from your                        browser may not display or print as intended. Download the latest version of Adobe Reader, free of charge. More information                        about viewing, downloading, and printing report files can be found at the common download problems FAQ.
**EXHIBIT
      32.2**




**SECTION
      1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**




Pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of GMX Resources Inc. (the
“Company”), hereby certifies that the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for
      the year ended December 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.




Date:
                March 15, 2007
            /s/
                Ken L. Kenworthy, Sr.Ken L. Kenworthy, Sr.Chief
                Financial Officer
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AXT, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Wilson W. Cheung, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), that, to the best of myknowledge:

(1) The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Dated: May 11, 2007 | By:    | /s/ Wilson W. Cheung    |
|---------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                |   | Wilson W. Cheung        |
|                |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----