alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Office of Government Ethics

# AGENCY:

Office of Government Ethics (OGE).

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

Notice is hereby given of the membership of the OGE Senior Executive Service (SES) Performance Review Board.

# DATES:

*Applicable date:*                         November 3, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sidney K. Williams, Human Resources Attorney-Advisor, Office of Government Ethics, Suite 500, 1201 New York Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20005-3917; Telephone: 202-482-9209.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

5 U.S.C. 4314(c) requires each agency to establish, in accordance with regulations prescribed by the Office of Personnel Management at 5 CFR part 430, subpart C and § 430.310 thereof in particular, one or more Senior Executive Service performance review boards. As a small executive branch agency, OGE has just one board. In order to ensure an adequate level of staffing and to avoid a constant series of recusals, the designated members of OGE's SES Performance Review Board are being drawn, as in the past, in large measure from the ranks of other executive branch agencies. The board shall review and evaluate the initial appraisal of each OGE senior executive's performance by his or her supervisor, along with any recommendations in each instance to the appointing authority relative to the performance of the senior executive. This notice updates the membership of OGE's SES Performance Review Board as it was most recently published at 88 FR 543134 (July 6, 2023).

The SES Performance Review Board of the Office of Government Ethics is composed of the following officials: Elizabeth Fischmann, Designated Agency Ethics Official, National Credit Union Association; Sean Dent, Senior Deputy General Counsel, Federal Housing Finance Agency; and Peter J. Constantine, Associate Solicitor for Legal Counsel, Office of the Solicitor, Department of Labor.

Approved: October 30, 2023.

Shelley K. Finlayson,

Acting Director, U.S. Office of Government Ethics.

[FR Doc. 2023-24349 Filed 11-2-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6345-03-P
115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1282 

AN ACT 

To redesignate certain clinics of the Department of Veterans 

Affairs located in Montana. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 
2 

†S 1282 ES

1 SECTION 1. REDESIGNATION OF CERTAIN DEPARTMENT OF 

2 VETERANS AFFAIRS CLINICS IN MONTANA. 

3 (a) DAVID J. THATCHER VA CLINIC.— 

4 (1) DESIGNATION.—The clinic of the Depart5 ment of Veterans Affairs located at 2687 Palmer 

6 Street in Missoula, Montana, shall after the date of 

7 the enactment of this Act be known and designated 

8 as the ‘‘David J. Thatcher VA Clinic’’. 

9 (2) REFERENCES.—Any reference in any law, 

10 regulation, map, document, paper, or other record of 

11 the United States to the clinic referred to in para12 graph (1) shall be considered to be a reference to 

13 the David J. Thatcher VA Clinic. 

14 (b) DR. JOSEPH MEDICINE CROW VA CLINIC.— 

15 (1) DESIGNATION.—The clinic of the Depart16 ment of Veterans Affairs located at 1775 Spring 

17 Creek Lane in Billings, Montana, shall after the 

18 date of the enactment of this Act be known and des19 ignated as the ‘‘Dr. Joseph Medicine Crow VA Clin20 ic’’. 

21 (2) REFERENCES.—Any reference in any law, 

22 regulation, map, document, paper, or other record of 

23 the United States to the clinic referred to in para24 graph (1) shall be considered to be a reference to 

25 the Dr. Joseph Medicine Crow VA Clinic. 

26 (3) PUBLIC DISPLAY OF NAME.— 
3 

†S 1282 ES

1 (A) IN GENERAL.—Any local public display 

2 of the name of the clinic referred to in para3 graph (1) carried out by the United States or 

4 through the use of Federal funds shall include 

5 the English name, Dr. Joseph Medicine Crow, 

6 and the Crow name, Dakaak Baako, of Dr. Jo7 seph Medicine Crow. 

8 (B) LOCAL DISPLAY.—For purposes of 

9 subparagraph (A), a local public display of the 

10 name of the clinic referred to in paragraph (1) 

11 includes a display inside the clinic, on the cam12 pus of the clinic, and in the community sur13 rounding the clinic, such as signs directing indi14 viduals to the clinic. 

15 (c) BENJAMIN CHARLES STEELE VA CLINIC.— 

16 (1) DESIGNATION.—The clinic of the Depart17 ment of Veterans Affairs located at 1766 Majestic 

18 Lane in Billings, Montana, shall after the date of 

19 the enactment of this Act be known and designated 

20 as the ‘‘Benjamin Charles Steele VA Clinic’’. 

21 (2) REFERENCES.—Any reference in any law, 

22 regulation, map, document, paper, or other record of 

23 the United States to the clinic referred to in para-
4 

†S 1282 ES

1 graph (1) shall be considered to be a reference to 

2 the Benjamin Charles Steele VA Clinic. 

Passed the Senate August 2, 2017. 

Attest: 

Secretary. 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1282 

AN ACT 

To redesignate certain clinics of the Department of 

Veterans Affairs located in Montana.
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74

 37

 38

 39

 40

★

▲

▲

▲

▲

★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

 500

 1000

 1500

 100

18 12 06 00

05/30

NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL

 Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 30 May 07

 EDAS Meteorological Data

Source

★ at 38.77 N 77.11 W Meters AGL

★

■

■

■

■

★

■ ■ ■

■

★

●

●

●

●

★

●

● ●

●
No. 55856.

protests 120439-K, etc. (New York).

#### Bellows & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited, in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AXT, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Wilson W. Cheung,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(“Section 906”), that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)   The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities and ExchangeAct of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

 

(2)   The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: August 5, 2004 | By:    | /s/ Wilson W. Cheung    |
|-----------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                  |   | Wilson W. Cheung        |
|                  |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
1 ... S eeT EX . R. A PP . P . 4 7 .4 

## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICTOFTEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 2 - 08 - 22 0- CV
M EL AN Y SM I TH AP P E L L ANT V . N O RTH W EST I N D EPEND EN T SC H O O L DI STR I C T, A PPELL EES CI TY OF ROA NO KE, AN D D ENTON CO UN TY

----- ----- FR O M THE 3 67 DI STRI CT CO URT O F DENTO N CO UN TY th

----- ----- -- 

### M E M ORANDU M OP I NI ON AND J UDGME NT 1

----- ----- -- O n M a y 2 9 , 2 0 0 8 , a n d J u n e 1 2 , 2 0 0 8 , w e n o t if ie d a p p e lla n t , in
a c c o r d a n c e w it h ru le o f a p p e lla t e p r o c e d u r e 4 2 .3 (c ), t h a t w e w o u ld d is m is s t h is2 ... A ppe l l ant ’ s not i ce ofap pea l w as en t i t l ed “Def end ant ’ s N ot i ce of

A p p e a l an d A ffi d a v i t of I n a b i l i ty to F i l e A p p e a l B o n d . ” T h e D e n to n C o u n ty D i st r i ctCl er k t i m el y f i l ed a c o n te s t t o t he af f i dav i t ofi nab i l i t y t o pa y a nd, on J u n e 1 2 , 2 0 0 8 , th e tri a l c o u rt s u s ta i n e d th e d i s tri c t c l e rk ’s c o n te s t. S eeT EX . R. A PP . P. 20 . 1. N ot hi ng i ndi cat es th at appel l ant sought l eave t o am end her a ffid a v i t a n d s h e h a s n o t a p p e a l e d th i s o rd e r. S e eIn reJ.W. , 52 S . W . 3d 730, 733 ( Tex. 2001 ) ( hol di n g t hat , w her e a ppe l l ant s m ove d t o a m end or su ppl em ent th ei raf f i dav i t s ofi ndi gen ce att he con t es t he ar i ng, “ t he cou r t of a p p e a ls s h o u ld h a v e d ir e c t e d t h e t r ia l c o u r t t o a llo w [a p p e lla n t s ] a re a s o n a b le oppor t uni t y t o am end t hei r af f i dav i t s and t o r ec ons i der t he con t es t s bas ed upon a n y a d d i ti o n a l i n fo rm a ti o n ” ).

3 ... S ee S u p re m e C o u rt o f T e x ., O rde r R eg a rd in gFe e s Ch a r

g e d in Civil Cases i n the S uprem e C our t and the C our ts of A ppeal s and Before the Judi ci al Panel on M ulti

di str i ct Liti gati on , M i s c . D o c k e t No. 07- 9138 ( Aug. 28, 2007 ) (l i s ti n g fe e s i n c o u rts o f a p p e a l s ). 2 app ea l unl es s t he $17 5 f i l i ng f e e w a s p a i d . S eeT EX . R. A PP . P. 4 2 .3 (c ). A ppel l ant has not pai d t he $ 17 5 fi l i ng f ee. S eeT EX . R. A PP . P. 5 , 1 2 .1 (b ). 2 Beca us e a ppe l l antha s f ai l ed t o com pl y w i t h a r equ i r em ent of t he r ul es of
a pp e l l a t e p r oc e du r e a nd t he Te xa s Su pr e m e Cou r t ’ s o r de ro f Aug us t 28, 2007 , 3

w e d i s m i s s th e a p p e a l . S eeT EX . R. A PP . P . 4 2 .3 (c ), 4 3 .2 (f). A ppel l ant shal l pay al l cost s of t hi s appeal , f orw hi ch l et execut i on i ssue. S eeT EX . R. A PP . P. 43. 4.

P E R CU R I AM
P A N E L D : M C C O Y , J .; C A Y C E , C .J .; a n d L IV IN G S T O N , J . DEL I VERE D: J ul y 10, 2008
# C_2017213EN.01002902.xml

| 3.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 213/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 213/29

---

Order of the General Court of 3 May 2017 — De Nicola v EIB

(Case T-71/16 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Civil service - EIB staff - Reports procedure - Career development report - 2007 appraisal procedure - Errors of law - Appeal manifestly unfounded))

(2017/C 213/39)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Carlo De Nicola (Strassen, Luxembourg) (represented by: G. Ferabecoli, lawyer)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Investment Bank (EIB) (represented initially by G. Nuvoli and F. Martin, and subsequently by G. Nuvoli and G. Faedo, acting as Agents, assisted by A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (sitting as a single judge) of 18 December 2015, De Nicola v EIB (F 82/12, EU:F:2015:166), seeking to have that judgment set aside in part.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Mr Carlo De Nicola shall bear his own costs and shall pay those incurred by the European Investment Bank (EIB) in the present proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Carlo De Nicola shall bear his own costs and shall pay those incurred by the European Investment Bank (EIB) in the present proceedings.

---

(1)  OJ C 118, 4.4.2016.

1

---
### Summary

**of Waste A cceptance Data Received by**  **NEIC During its Inspections of Veolia and Heritage-WTI**

**Parameter Veolia (2009-2011)**  **Heritage-WTI (May 2012-May 2013)**  Total Profiles 14328 134680 No. of Unique Suppliers 3054 ND No. of Unique Profiles 9908 13449 Percent of Unique Profiles 69% 10% *ND = No data

### Summary **of Waste A cceptance Data Received by**  **NEIC During its Inspections of Veolia and Heritage-WTI**
# C_2017300EN.01000601.xml

| 11.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 300/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.9.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 300/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 20 July 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof — Austria) — Landeskrankenanstalten-Betriebsgesellschaft — KABEG v Mutuelles du Mans assurances — MMA IARD SA

(Case C-340/16) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Judicial cooperation in civil matters - Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 - Article 9(1) - Article 11(2) - Jurisdiction in matters relating to insurance - Direct action by the injured party against the insurer - Action brought by the employer, a public-law institution, statutory assignee of the rights of its employee, against the insurer of the vehicle involved - Subrogation))

(2017/C 300/07)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Oberster Gerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Landeskrankenanstalten-Betriebsgesellschaft — KABEG

Applicant:

Defendant: Mutuelles du Mans assurances — MMA IARD SA

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 9(1)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters, read together with Article 11(2) thereof, must be interpreted as meaning that an employer, established in one Member State, which continued to pay the salary of its employee absent as the result of a road traffic accident and to which have passed the employee’s rights with regard to the company insuring the civil liability resulting from the vehicle involved in that accident, which is established in a second Member State, may, in the capacity of ‘injured party’, within the meaning of Article 11(2), sue the insurance company before the courts of the first Member State, where a direct action is permitted.

---

(1)  OJ C 305, 22.8.2016.

1

---
# C_2015118EN.01004102.xml

| 13.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/41

---

Action brought on 20 February 2015 — Facchinello v OHIM — Olimpia Splendid (Synthesis)

(Case T-81/15)

(2015/C 118/53)

Language in which the application was lodged: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Danila Facchinello (Molinella, Italy) (represented by: F. Torlontano, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Olimpia Splendid SpA (Gualtieri, Italy)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word element ‘Synthesis’ — Community trade mark No 2 8 71  069

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Revocation proceedings

Procedure before OHIM

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 21 November 2014 in Case R 2169/2013-1

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 21 November 2014 and, consequently, declare that the Community trade mark Synthesis is not revoked in respect of goods in Class 11 (apparatus for air conditioning); |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 21 November 2014 and, consequently, declare that the Community trade mark Synthesis is not revoked in respect of goods in Class 11 (apparatus for air conditioning);

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009, insofar as the First Board of Appeal revoked the Community trade mark on the ground that the evidence adduced by its proprietor was not capable of establishing genuine use of that mark. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009, insofar as the First Board of Appeal revoked the Community trade mark on the ground that the evidence adduced by its proprietor was not capable of establishing genuine use of that mark.

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Integrated Healthcare Holdings,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), each of the
undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby
certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            1.    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act
                  of 1934; and

            2.    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company at the dates and for the period
                  indicated.

      This Certificate has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.


         Dated:  August 13, 2004                     By: /s/ James Ligon
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         James Ligon
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTH PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 1998,
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2,593
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         3,450
<OTHER-SE>                                     (6,043)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,093
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,093)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,093)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 
U.S.C. Section 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection
with the Annual Report of Westsphere Asset Corporation, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Douglas
MacDonald, Chief Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

| |     |                                                                                                                                                          
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) | The Report
  fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
  Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
| |     |                                                                                                                                                          
| | (2) | The
  information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                     |                                                                |                         
|-------------------- | -------------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------
|Date: May
  14, 2009 | By:                                                            | /s/ Douglas
  Mac Donald
|                     |                                                                |                         
|                     | Name:
  Douglas Mac Donald                                    
|                     | Title: Chief
  Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

---
No. 66279.

#### Associated Dry Goods Corp. (Lord & Taylor Div.) et al. *v.*United States,

protests 60/21032, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of candlestick holders similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Mottahedeh Creations, Ltd., et al.*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 9, C.D. 2095), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Belk, Inc. (the
Corporation) for the quarter ended October 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned, the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the
Corporation, certifies that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation. /s/ Thomas M. Belk, Jr.Thomas M. Belk, Jr.Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive OfficerDecember 9, 2004