alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Updated December 27, 2023

OTCnet 4.8 – Release Notes – Page 1 of 4

OTCnet 4.8 Release Notes

January 2024

blank
Updated December 27, 2023

OTCnet 4.8 – Release Notes – Page 2 of 4

blank

CONTENTS

OTCnet Release 4.8 Overview .................................................................................................................................................3

System Updates........................................................................................................................................................................3
Updated December 27, 2023

OTCnet 4.8 – Release Notes – Page 3 of 4

OTCnet Release 4.8 Overview

The U.S. Treasury Bureau of the Fiscal Service (Fiscal Service) Over the Counter Division (OTCD) is 

updating the Over-the-Counter Channel Application (OTCnet) to Release 4.8 in February 2024, which 

introduces the following updates:

System Updates

• Support the M440 Card Terminal: OTCnet Online and the Kiosk Tablet will support the 

Verifone M440 card terminal for card processing.

• Offline support for RDM EC9600/EC9700 scanners: With Release 4.8, users will be able to 

use the RDM EC9600/9700 scanners offline via USB connection. The Offline About Page will 

display the supported scanners.

• Upgrade to the OTCnet Local Bridge (OLB): With Release 4.8, the OLB will be upgraded to 

version 2.6.0.1 and will require Java v11 or v17. Users are urged to upgrade as soon as 

possible, but users who utilize Verifone M440 or Verifone MX925 card terminals will need to 

upgrade to continue using these card terminals. 

• Address Functional Defects: Address four defects, impacting reporting, accessibility, and user 

provisioning. 

• Batch Error Details: In Release 4.8, the team will include additional batch error details for 

duplicate IRN and duplicate batch in the getBatchStatus XML response that will be returned to 

the POS agencies.

• Online eUDS Replacement: Online server calls to eUDS will be replaced with server calls to 

the Online User database tables due to the decommission of eUDS.

• User Provisioning Updates: Addresses internal and agency requests that will improve the 

user’s experiences utilizing OTCnet’s User Management Module.

• Address Security Findings: The team will resolve vulnerabilities found by implementing the 

necessary resolution strategies and upgrades to the application, webservices, and codebase.

• Online Help Files Update: The team will update and integrate online help files for the current 

online version of OTCnet.

• Integrate User by Access Group Security Reports with OTCnet’s User Management 

Module: The team will update the User by Access Group FI/FPA security reports to query user 

data in the OTCnet database instead of LDAP.
Updated December 27, 2023

OTCnet 4.8 – Release Notes – Page 4 of 4
Exhibit 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of EnerTeck Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of the undersigned's
knowledge, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



Dated:  June 6, 2005                By:/s/ Dwaine Reese
                                    Dwaine Reese, Chief Executive Officer
                                    (Principal Executive Officer)


Dated:  June 6, 2005                By:/s/ Parrish B. Ketchmark
                                    Parrish B. Ketchmark,
                                    Principal Financial Officer
January 231-d, 1939

Mr. Karl Cayton, CountyAttorney Dawson-County Lamesa, Texas Dear Mr. Cagton Opinion No. O-194 Re: Fees of County Tax AssessorCollector, collecting taxes for independentschool districts. Your request for an opinion on the following question: -''hoes the County Tax Assessor-Collectorwho has been collecting taxes from some of the Independent SchoolDistricts have to turn in the percentages they allow him as fees or retain them personally?" has been received by this office. Article 3883,Revised Civil Statutes, provides in de- _- tail the maximum fees for all officersnamed therein and Itwas held in the case of Nichols vs. Galveston County, 228 S.W. 547, by the Supreme Court that the fees collectedby an assessor for assessed independent schooldistricts' taxeswere accountable for under the maximum fee bill. Article 3891,Revised Civil Statutes, provides in effect the compensations, limitationsand maximums of fees and salaries fixed by the maximum fee law for officers includesand applies to all fees and compensationswhatever collectedby said officers in their official capacity.

It has been repeatedly held by the Attorney Generalus office that fees accruing to the tax assessor-collectorwho has collected taxes for independent schooldistricts is'~required to account for said. compensationas fees of office and all excess fees shouldbe depositedwith the county treasurer.

Trusting that the foregoinganswers your inquiry, I remainMr. Karl Cayton, January 23rd, 1939 Page 2 O-194

Yours very truly ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
By s/Ardell~

Williams Assistant AW:OB:wc

APPROVED s/Gerald C. Mann ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS
##### 



EXHIBIT 99 (a)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northland Cable Television,
Inc. and Subsidiary (the Company) on Form 10Q for the period ended
September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Form 10-Q), I, John Whetzell, Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;

| |                                                                                                                                                           
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| | (1) The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 (a) or (15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m or 78(d)); and   
|
| | (2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Dated: November 12, 2002



| | BY: | /s/ JOHN S. WHETZELL                    
| | --- | ----------------------------------------
| |     | John S. Whetzell
Chief Executive Officer
Case 2:05-mc-00018-MAM Document 67 Filed 06/26/08 Page 1 of 12
Case 2:05-mc-00018-MAM Document 67 Filed 06/26/08 Page 2 of 12
Case 2:05-mc-00018-MAM Document 67 Filed 06/26/08 Page 3 of 12
Case 2:05-mc-00018-MAM Document 67 Filed 06/26/08 Page 4 of 12
Case 2:05-mc-00018-MAM Document 67 Filed 06/26/08 Page 5 of 12
Case 2:05-mc-00018-MAM Document 67 Filed 06/26/08 Page 6 of 12
Case 2:05-mc-00018-MAM Document 67 Filed 06/26/08 Page 7 of 12
Case 2:05-mc-00018-MAM Document 67 Filed 06/26/08 Page 8 of 12
Case 2:05-mc-00018-MAM Document 67 Filed 06/26/08 Page 9 of 12
Case 2:05-mc-00018-MAM Document 67 Filed 06/26/08 Page 10 of 12
Case 2:05-mc-00018-MAM Document 67 Filed 06/26/08 Page 11 of 12
Case 2:05-mc-00018-MAM Document 67 Filed 06/26/08 Page 12 of 12
Exhibit 32.1






CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT






Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, each of the undersigned officers of EcoSystem Corporation (the “Company”), certifies that:






1.  The Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 3) of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and






2.  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated: April 12, 2011
/S/ KEVIN KREISLER

KEVIN KREISLER

Chief Executive Officer






Dated: April 12, 2011
/S/ JACQUELINE FLYNN

JACQUELINE FLYNN

Chief Financial Officer




This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other purpose.
# C_2018392EN.01002102.xml

| 29.10.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 392/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.10.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 392/21

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 September 2018 — Czech Republic v Commission

(Case T-627/16) (1)

((EAGF - Expenditure excluded from financing - Expenditure incurred by the Czech Republic - Decoupled direct aid - Remote-sensing checks - Wine-growing sector - Cross-compliance - Reoccurrence of non-compliance))

(2018/C 392/25)

Language of the case: Czech

Parties

Applicant: Czech Republic (represented by: M. Smolek, J. Pavliš and J. Vláčil, acting as Agents)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: D. Triantafyllou, Z. Malůšková and K. Walkerová, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the applicant: Kingdom of Sweden (represented by: F. Bergius, A. Falk, C. Meyer-Seitz and H. Shev, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/1059 of 20 June 2016 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ 2016 L 173, p. 59), in so far as it excludes the payments made by the Czech Republic under the EAGF in the amount of EUR 30 206 401,58.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/1059 of 20 June 2016 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD), in so far as it excludes the payments made by the Czech Republic under the EAGF in the amount of EUR 6 356 909,30 in respect of cross-compliance checks for the financial year 2011; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/1059 of 20 June 2016 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD), in so far as it excludes the payments made by the Czech Republic under the EAGF in the amount of EUR 6 356 909,30 in respect of cross-compliance checks for the financial year 2011;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission, the Czech Republic and the Kingdom of Sweden to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission, the Czech Republic and the Kingdom of Sweden to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 392, 24.10.2016.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1263 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1263

To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to prohibit oil-, gas-, 
 and methane hydrate-related seismic activities in the North Atlantic, 
Mid-Atlantic, South Atlantic, and Straits of Florida planning areas of 
          the outer Continental Shelf, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2017

 Mr. Booker (for himself, Mr. Whitehouse, Mr. Nelson, Mr. Blumenthal, 
  Mr. Menendez, Mr. Cardin, Mr. Markey, Ms. Hassan, Ms. Warren, Mrs. 
Shaheen, and Mr. Sanders) introduced the following bill; which was read 
  twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to prohibit oil-, gas-, 
 and methane hydrate-related seismic activities in the North Atlantic, 
Mid-Atlantic, South Atlantic, and Straits of Florida planning areas of 
          the outer Continental Shelf, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Atlantic Seismic Airgun Protection 
Act''.

SEC. 2. MORATORIUM ON OIL-, GAS-, AND METHANE HYDRATE-RELATED SEISMIC 
              ACTIVITIES IN NORTH ATLANTIC, MID-ATLANTIC, SOUTH 
              ATLANTIC, AND STRAITS OF FLORIDA PLANNING AREAS OF OUTER 
              CONTINENTAL SHELF.

    Section 11 of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act (43 U.S.C. 
1340) is amended by adding at the end the following:
    ``(i) Moratorium on Oil-, Gas-, and Methane Hydrate-Related Seismic 
Activities in North Atlantic, Mid-Atlantic, South Atlantic, and Straits 
of Florida Planning Areas.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, 
no person or agency of the United States may conduct geological or 
geophysical activities (as those terms are described in the final 
programmatic environmental impact statement of the Bureau of Ocean 
Energy Management entitled `Atlantic OCS Proposed Geological and 
Geophysical Activities, Mid-Atlantic and South Atlantic Planning Areas' 
and completed February 2014) in support of oil, gas, or methane hydrate 
exploration and development in any area located in the North Atlantic, 
Mid-Atlantic, South Atlantic, or Straits of Florida planning areas of 
the outer Continental Shelf.''.
                                 <all>
```
1 

### Kordzi, Joe

From: Carl Weilert <cweilert@aol.com> Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2014 2:04 PM To: Kordzi, Joe Subject: Power Engineering Article about Utility FGD Design Trends Attachments: Utility_FGD_Design_Trends_Article.pdf

Joe:

I think this one should go through OK. Let me know if it does not.

Carl Weilert
SAT Report

PMN Number: P-13-0260

SAT Date: 2/15/2013

Print Date: 7/1/2013

Related cases:

Concern levels:

Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments

Level of Concern: 1-2 3

 Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments

3 11

Exposure Based Review:

Health: No

Ecotox: No

Routes of exposure: Health: Drinking Water Inhalation 

Ecotox: All releases to water

Fate: ;

Keywords:

 Keywords: MUTA, IRR-MM,E, UNCERT-IMMUNO, SENS-RESPIRATORY, 

UNCERT-ONCO, NEURO

Summary of Assessment:

 Fate:

Fate Summary: P-13-0260

FATE: 

S < 1 mg/L at 25 C (Analogs)

VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E)

BP > 400 C (E)

H < 1.00E-8 (E)

POTW removal (%) = 90 via sorption

Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg > mo
Sorption to soils/sediments = v.strong

PBT Potential: P3B1

*CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl

 Health:

 Health Summary: Absorption is nil through the skin and poor through the 

lungs and GI tract based on physical/chemical properties. Expect poor hydrolysis in the stomach 

with poor release of . By analogy to there is low 

concern for acute toxicity (oral and dermal routes LD50 = 16 g/kg), systemic effects, and 

reproductive/developmental toxicity. The analog has a NOEL of 1000 mg/kg in a combined 

repeated dose/reproductive/developmental toxicity screening test (EPA Hazard Characterization 

Document, March 2011). This analog is positive in an ip mouse micronucleus assay. The PMN 

material is expected to be irritating to mucous membranes and there is uncertain concern for 

oncogenicity based on the positive result in the micronucleus assay and possible release of 

in the stomach. There is also some concern for neurotoxicity based on possible release of 

and by analogy to which caused inhibition of brain esterase at 520 

ppm in a 90-day dietary neurotoxicity study in rats with a NOEL of 207 ppm There 

is concern for respiratory sensitization and uncertain concern for immunotoxicity for zinc. Low 

moderate concern. 

 Ecotox:

Test Organism Test 

Type

Test End 

Point

Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 *

daphnid 48-h LC50 * 0.74

green algal 96-h EC50 *

fish _ chronic value *

daphnid _ chronic 

value

* 0.074

algal _ chronic 

value

*

Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50 _

Sewage Sludge _ Chronic 

Value

_

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for stable zinc salts; SAR 

chemical class = zinc dithiocarbamate; MW 530; mp unknown (P); S < 1 mg/L at 25 

C (P); pH7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured 

concentrations; hardness <180.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Data for the analog zinc were reviewed in a U.S. 

EPA HPV Hazard Characterization available at 
2012.pdf.

Factors Values Comments

Assessment Factor 10

Concentration of Concern 

(ppb)

7 *

SARs zinc complexes

SAR Class zinc complexes

Ecotox Category None

Ecotox Factors Comments: 

 SAT Chair: Becky Jones
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1263 

To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to prohibit oil-, gas-, 

and methane hydrate-related seismic activities in the North Atlantic, 

Mid-Atlantic, South Atlantic, and Straits of Florida planning areas of 

the outer Continental Shelf, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 25, 2017 

Mr. BOOKER (for himself, Mr. WHITEHOUSE, Mr. NELSON, Mr. 

BLUMENTHAL, Mr. MENENDEZ, Mr. CARDIN, Mr. MARKEY, Ms. HASSAN, 

Ms. WARREN, Mrs. SHAHEEN, and Mr. SANDERS) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act to prohibit 

oil-, gas-, and methane hydrate-related seismic activities 

in the North Atlantic, Mid-Atlantic, South Atlantic, and 

Straits of Florida planning areas of the outer Continental Shelf, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Atlantic Seismic 

5 Airgun Protection Act’’. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1263 IS

1 SEC. 2. MORATORIUM ON OIL-, GAS-, AND METHANE HY2 DRATE-RELATED SEISMIC ACTIVITIES IN 

3 NORTH ATLANTIC, MID-ATLANTIC, SOUTH AT4 LANTIC, AND STRAITS OF FLORIDA PLAN5 NING AREAS OF OUTER CONTINENTAL 

6 SHELF. 

7 Section 11 of the Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act 

8 (43 U.S.C. 1340) is amended by adding at the end the 

9 following: 

10 ‘‘(i) MORATORIUM ON OIL-, GAS-, AND METHANE

11 HYDRATE-RELATED SEISMIC ACTIVITIES IN NORTH AT12 LANTIC, MID-ATLANTIC, SOUTH ATLANTIC, AND STRAITS

13 OF FLORIDA PLANNING AREAS.—Notwithstanding any 

14 other provision of law, no person or agency of the United 

15 States may conduct geological or geophysical activities (as 

16 those terms are described in the final programmatic envi17 ronmental impact statement of the Bureau of Ocean En18 ergy Management entitled ‘Atlantic OCS Proposed Geo19 logical and Geophysical Activities, Mid-Atlantic and South 

20 Atlantic Planning Areas’ and completed February 2014) 

21 in support of oil, gas, or methane hydrate exploration and 

22 development in any area located in the North Atlantic, 

23 Mid-Atlantic, South Atlantic, or Straits of Florida plan24 ning areas of the outer Continental Shelf.’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
No. 52182.

protests 131934-K, etc. (New York).

#### Pilot Radio Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

*266Opinion by

Oliver, P.'J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of record changer units similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Garrard Sales Corp.*v. *United States*(35 C. C. P. A. 39, C. A. D. 369). In accordance therewith the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 63578.

protest 58/20816 (San Francisco).

#### United China & Glass Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the frames in question are composed of wood and not of iron, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# C_2017239EN.01001202.xml

| 24.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 239/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 239/12

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 18 May 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de grande instance de Lyon — France) — Jean-Philippe Lahorgue v Ordre des avocats du barreau de Lyon, Conseil national des barreaux (CNB), Conseil des barreaux européens (CCBE), Ordre des avocats du barreau de Luxembourg

(Case C-99/16) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Freedom to provide services - Directive 77/249/EEC - Article 4 - Practice of the legal profession - Router for accessing the private virtual network for lawyers (RPVA) - Router for RPVA access - Refusal to issue to a lawyer registered at a Bar of another Member State - Discriminatory measure))

(2017/C 239/16)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal de grande instance de Lyon

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Jean-Philippe Lahorgue

Applicant:

Defendants: Ordre des avocats du barreau de Lyon, Conseil national des barreaux (CNB), Conseil des barreaux européens (CCBE), Ordre des avocats du barreau de Luxembourg

Defendants:

Intervening party: Ministère public

Intervening party:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The refusal, on the part of the competent authorities of a Member State, to issue a router for access to the private virtual network for lawyers to a lawyer duly registered at a Bar of another Member State, for the sole reason that that lawyer is not registered at a Bar of the first Member State, in which he wishes to practise his profession as a free provider of services, in situations where the obligation to work in conjunction with another lawyer is not imposed by law, constitutes a restriction on the freedom to provide services under Article 4 of Council Directive 77/249/EEC of 22 March 1977 to facilitate the effective exercise by lawyers of freedom to provide services, read in the light of Article 56 TFEU and the third paragraph of Article 57 TFEU. It is for the national court to determine whether such a refusal, in the light of the context in which it is put forward, genuinely serves the objectives of consumer protection and the proper administration of justice which might justify it and whether the resulting restrictions do not appear to be disproportionate in regard to those objectives.

---

(1)  OJ C 165, 10.5.2016.

1

---