alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Blank Pages In The Original Document Have Been Omitted.
**EXHIBIT31.2**I, Brian T. Marley, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Belk, Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleadingwith respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financialreporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for theregistrant and have: a. Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b. Designed such internal control over financial reporting, orcaused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under oursupervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability offinancial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for externalpurposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;  c. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  d. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s mostrecent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent functions): a. All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting which arereasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and  b. Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting.Date: December 7, 2006     /s/ Brian T. Marley   Brian T. Marley   Executive Vice President, Finance
No. 55145.

#### Henri Bendel, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 135730-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

The protests were dismissed.
No. 65397.

#### Robert Alexander et al. *v.*United States,

protests 60/1915, etc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Schmidt Pritchard & Co. et al.*(47 C.C.P.A. 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit

__________________________ 

IN RE HO KEUNG TSE, 

Petitioner. 

__________________________ 

Miscellaneous Docket No. 168 

__________________________ 

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus to the United 

States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 06-CV-6573, Judge Saundra Brown Armstrong. 

__________________________ 

ON PETITION

__________________________ 

O R D E R

Ho Keung Tse submits a petition for a writ of mandamus directing the United States District Court for the 

Northern District of California to (1) vacate its October 4, 

2007 order staying the case pending reexamination of the 

patent in suit, (2) lift the stay and (3) reassign the case to 

a different district court judge. 

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT: 

Case: 13-168 Document: 6 Page: 1 Filed: 10/02/2013
IN RE TSE 2

Apple Inc., MusicMatch, Inc., and Sony Network Entertainment International LLC are directed to respond no 

later than October 15, 2013. 

 FOR THE COURT

 /s/ Daniel E. O’Toole

 Daniel E. O’Toole

Clerk

s26 

Case: 13-168 Document: 6 Page: 2 Filed: 10/02/2013
* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions

that have no precedential value and merely decide particular

cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes

needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal

profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published. 

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-40177

 Conference Calendar 

__________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JUAN ALONSO-MARTINEZ,

 Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - -

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas 

USDC No. L-94-CR-209-1

- - - - - - - - - -

(October 19, 1995)

Before POLITZ, Chief Judge, and REAVLEY and SMITH, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Juan Alonso-Martinez has filed a

brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744,

(1967), and we have independently reviewed the brief and record,

and found no nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel is excused

from further responsibilities herein and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.
# C_2017256EN.01002402.xml

| 7.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 256/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 256/24

---

Judgment of the General Court of 22 June 2017 — Biogena Naturprodukte v EUIPO (ZUM wohl)

(Case T-236/16) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Application for EU figurative mark ZUM wohl - Absolute grounds for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Reference to statement submitted to the Board of Appeal reproduced in the application - Evidence annexed to the request for a hearing))

(2017/C 256/27)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Biogena Naturprodukte GmbH & Co. KG (Salzburg, Austria) (represented by: I. Schiffer and G. Hermann, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Hanne, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 February 2016 (case R 1982/2015-1), relating to the application for registration of the figurative sign ZUM wohl as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Biogena Naturprodukte GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Biogena Naturprodukte GmbH & Co. KG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 243, 4.7.2016.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32
                                                                      ----------

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Extended Systems Incorporated on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended
December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report"), I, Charles W. Jepson, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of Extended Systems Incorporated.


/s/ CHARLES W. JEPSON
------------------------------
Charles W. Jepson
Chief Executive Officer
February 14, 2005
<PAGE>



                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Extended Systems Incorporated on Form
10-Q for the quarter ended
December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
"Report"), I, Valerie A. Heusinkveld, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of Extended Systems Incorporated.


/s/ VALERIE A. HEUSINKVELD
------------------------------
Valerie A. Heusinkveld
Chief Financial Officer
February 14, 2005
Clarification of Benefits




	 Respironics, Inc.
 Corporate Services
 1010 Murry Ridge Lane
 Murrysville, Pennsylvania 15668-8525
 Phone: 724-387-5200
 Fax: 724-387-5010
	  	Exhibit 10.48

  
 May 23, 2003

  
 Gerald E. McGinnis 
 1031 Petit Court 
 Marco Island, FL 34145 
  

	Re:	 	Clarification of Benefits Under Agreement Regarding Supplemental Retirement Benefits 

  
 Dear Gerry: 
  
 Reference is made to that certain Agreement Regarding Supplemental Retirement Benefits dated as of September 1, 1992 (the “SRB Agreement”)
between you and Respironics, Inc. (the “Company”). Capitalized terms used herein and not defined are used as defined in the SRB Agreement. 
  
 Contributions to Lincoln Annuity Plan. Pursuant to Section 1.01(a) of the SRB Agreement, the Company’s obligation to make contributions to the
Lincoln Annuity Plan was to terminate on the earlier of (i) the date on which you retire from the Company or (ii) the date you reached age 65. You reached age 65 on March 17, 1999. Notwithstanding the foregoing, however, the Company has continued to
make contributions to the Lincoln Annuity Plan. These payments have been fully disclosed in the Compensation Table of the Company’s Proxy Statement in those years in which your total compensation has resulted in you being included in the
Compensation Table. 
  
 The purpose of this letter is to
acknowledge that the foregoing payments have been made and to confirm that the Company will continue to make contributions to the Lincoln Annuity Plan in accordance with Section 1.01 of the SRB Agreement or a comparable successor investment vehicle
until the date on which your employment with the Company is terminated in accordance with the terms of the Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated as of April 1, 1999 (the “Employment Agreement”) between you and the Company.

  
 Except as amended hereby, the SRB Agreement shall remain in
full force and effect in accordance with the terms thereof. Please sign below to acknowledge your agreement with the foregoing. 
  

	 Very truly yours,

	
	 RESPIRONICS, INC.

		
	 By:
	 	 /s/    JAMES W. LIKEN


		
	 Title:
	 	 President & Chief Executive Officer




  
 Acknowledged and agreed this 7th day of June, 2003 
  

	 /s/    GERALD E. MCGINNIS


	GERALD E. McGINNIS
# C_2018166EN.01002801.xml

| 14.5.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 166/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.5.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 166/28

---

Judgment of the General Court of 22 March 2018 — Agricola J.M. v EUIPO — Miguel Torres (CLOS DE LA TORRE)

(Case T-806/16) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark CLOS DE LA TORRE - Earlier national word mark TORRES - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Likelihood of confusion))

(2018/C 166/36)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Agricola J.M., SL (Girona, Spain) (represented by: J. Clos Creus, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Miguel Torres, SA (Vilafranca del Penedès, Spain) (represented by: J. Güell Serra, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 28 July 2016 (Case R 2099//2015-5) concerning opposition proceedings between Miguel Torres and Agricola J.M.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Agricola J.M., SL to bear the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Agricola J.M., SL to bear the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 14, 16.1.2017.

1

---
September 17, 1999

(
u oy
Jounson =
INTERNATIONAL oat
Cynthia L. Johnson

Director Cash Management Policy and Planning Division
Financial Management Service

Department of the Treasury, Room 420

401 14" Street SW

Washington DC 20227

Re: RIN 1510-AA79 Payment of Federal Taxes and Treasury Tax and Loan Program
Dear Ms. Johnson:

Johnson International Inc., a $1.7 billion bank holding company headquartered in Racine,
WI, with affiliated banks in Wisconsin, Illinois, and Arizona, appreciates the opportunity to
comment on the above-referenced regulatory proposal.

Our bank currently provides TT&L collection services for our customers as an agent of the
Treasury. A recent review of the profitability of this activity indicates that we provide
these services at a net loss to our company. Human resources, computer processing and
other miscellaneous expenses are not covered by the income we receive holding the
Treasury's money prior to remittance.

While we appreciate your attempt to streamline and modernize this regulation, the net
effect appears to be the elimination of the 25 basis point discount from the formula used
to calculate interest due. The elimination of the 25 basis points from the formula further
increases the net loss to our bank for collecting and processing these payments.

While we support your effort to streamline the index in the formula, we adamantly oppose
this proposal because of the elimination of the 25 basis point component to the formula.

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this proposal.

Sincerely,

Vice-President Risk Manager
Corporate Compliance Officer

Ce: Mark Behrens, Senior Vice-President Johnson International
Harry Argue, Executive Vice-President Wisconsin's Bankers Association

JOHNSON INTERNATIONAL, INC.

4041 NORTH MAIN STREET — RACINE, WI 53402-3104 PHONE: 414/681-4620 FAX: 414/681-4625)

wwwjohnsonbank.com
No. 50847.

#### Protests 969682-G, etc., of Strauss-Eckardt Co., Inc. (Baltimore).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of bonbon dishes similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Butler Bros.*(33 C. C. P. A. 22, C. A. D. 310). In accordance therewith the merchandise was held properly dutiable at 70 percent under paragraph 212 without the additional assessment of 10 cents per dozen pieces.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-20-00484-CV

Juana Laguna, Joanna Gonzalez Acevedo, as Administrator of the Estate of Regino 

Gonzalez Jr.

v.

Raymond R. Fulp III, D.O. and Ray Fulp Orthopedics, PA

On Appeal from the

92nd District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. C-0973-13-A-1

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and the cause 

remanded to the trial court. The Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED 

and REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with its opinion. Costs of the appeal 

are adjudged against appellees.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

July 21, 2022
II 

Calendar No. 679 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1149 

[Report No. 115–393] 

To amend the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act to repeal a provision 

limiting the export of timber harvested from land conveyed to the Kake 

Tribal Corporation under that Act. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 17, 2017 

Ms. MURKOWSKI introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

NOVEMBER 28, 2018 

Reported by Ms. MURKOWSKI, without amendment 

A BILL 

To amend the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act to repeal 

a provision limiting the export of timber harvested from 

land conveyed to the Kake Tribal Corporation under 

that Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
2 

•S 1149 RS

1 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF PROVISION LIMITING THE EXPORT 

2 OF TIMBER HARVESTED FROM CERTAIN 

3 KAKE TRIBAL CORPORATION LAND. 

4 Section 42 of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement 

5 Act (43 U.S.C. 1629h) is amended— 

6 (1) by striking subsection (h); 

7 (2) by redesignating subsection (i) as subsection 

8 (h); and 

9 (3) in subsection (h) (as so redesignated), in 

10 the first sentence, by striking ‘‘and to provide’’ and 

11 all that follows through ‘‘subsection (h)’’. 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS

kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Calendar No. 679 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1149 

[Report No. 115–393] 

A BILL 

To amend the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act 

Corporation under that Act. harvested from land conveyed to the Kake Tribal to repeal a provision limiting the export of timber 

NOVEMBER 28, 2018 

Reported without amendment 


kjohnson on DSK79L0C42 with BILLS
Exhibit 10.14


                             DEMAND PROMISSORY NOTE


$115,275.00                    Encino, California                    May 15,2001
                                  (City, State)

FOR VALUE RECEIVED, the undersigned,  Steven Meadows (MEADOWS) , promise to pay,
on demand,  to CBCom,  Inc., or order,  at 16830 Ventura  Boulevard,  Suite 211,
Encino,  CA 91436 (CBCOM),  the sum of One Hundred Fifteen  Thousand Two Hundred
seventy Five Dollars ($115,275) with interest at 5% per annum thereon.

This Promissory Note is collateralized by, and in the same amount, as salary and
other  compensation  due and  payable by CBCOM to MEADOWS as of the above  date.
This note will be reduced by any amount of said compensation that is forgiven by
MEADOWS, and any accrued interest will be waived.

When  demand or order is made,  MEADOWS may apply any  remaining  amount of said
compensation  under the terms  described  above,  with any balance being due and
payable by MEADOWS.

In  the  event  of  default,   the  sole  remedy  for  CBCOM  will  be  for  the
collateralized  portion of said  compensation  that  remains  due and payable to
MEADOWS. Each maker shall be jointly and severally liable hereon and each maker,
co-maker and guarantor  consents to renewals,  replacements,  and  extensions of
time  for  payment  hereon  before,  at,  or  after  maturity,  consents  to the
acceptance, release or substitution of securities for this note.



ACCEPTED BY:

-----------------------------------
Signature


-----------------------------------   -----------------------------------
Signature                             Address


-----------------------------------   -----------------------------------
Title                                 SSA# or Federal ID#
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

LINDA LYNCH : CIVIL ACTION

:

 v. :

:

HOWARD SCHULTZ & ASSOCIATES : NO. 02-4354

et al.

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of JANUARY, 2003, it is

Ordered that the CONFERENCE scheduled for Wednesday, January 8,

2003 is canceled and rescheduled for Monday, February 24, 2003 at

4:15 p.m.. The conference will be held in chambers, room 7613 on

the 7th floor.

ATTEST: or BY THE COURT

BY: 

 Deputy Clerk Anita B. Brody, J.

Civ 12 (9/83)

Copies FAXED on _________ to: Copies MAILED on ____________ to:

Kingsley A. Jarvis, Esq. (via fax: 610-272-6087)

Joseph S. Nescio, Esq. (via fax: 610-436-5023)

Case 2:02-cv-04354-AB Document 12 Filed 01/03/2003 Page 1 of 1
##### 



Exhibit 32-13 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of The Detroit Edison Securitization Funding LLC
(the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David E. Meador, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the
best of my knowledge and belief:  (1)
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Dated: March 15, 2005
    
    /s/ DAVID E. MEADORDavid E. MeadorManagerThe Detroit Edison Securitization Funding LLC
 A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the
Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
i i i i i i

MEMORANDUM OPINION

No. 04-08-00289-CV

PETROGULF CORP. and Douglas Cameron McLeod,

Appellants

v.

MAGNUM PRODUCING, L.P.,

Appellee

From the 229th Judicial District Court, Duval County, Texas

Trial Court No. DC-08-65

Honorable Alex W. Gabert, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Alma L. López, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Phylis J. Speedlin, Justice

Delivered and Filed: August 13, 2008 

DISMISSED

Appellants have filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. The motion contains a certificate of

service to appellee, and the appellee has not opposed the motion. Therefore, we grant the motion

and dismiss the appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). Costs of the appeal are taxed against

appellants.

PER CURIAM