Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 85 / Friday, May 2, 2014 / Proposed Rules 25033 

1Official Notice is taken of this proceeding (72 FR 

25986). 

I differential levels in the southeastern 

marketing areas. 

Accordingly, the Department held 

another hearing from May 21–23, 2007 

(72 FR 25986) 1 in Tampa, Florida, to 

address, among other things, the 

adequacy of the Class I differential 

levels in the southeastern marketing 

areas, and additional changes to the 

transportation credit balancing fund that 

would provide for additional 

transportation cost recovery for milk 

meeting the order’s fluid needs. 

An interim final rule was published 

on March 17, 2008, (73 FR 14153) that 

adjusted the Class I price surface for 

each county within the Appalachian, 

Florida and Southeast marketing orders. 

In that interim final rule, the 

Department decided to increase blend 

prices through adjustments to the Class 

I differentials to assist in compensating 

producers for higher transportation 

costs. In addition, more stringent 

pooling standards and other 

adjustments to the transportation credit 

provisions were adopted to ensure that 

milk pooled on the southeastern orders 

was adequately servicing the market’s 

fluid needs. These amendments 

included: (1) Extending the number of 

months in which transportation credit 

balancing funds are paid (July through 

December) to include the months of 

January and February, with the option 

of the month of June if requested and 

approved by the Market Administrator; 

(2) expanding the payment of 

transportation credits for supplemental 

milk to include the entire load of milk 

rather than the calculated Class I 

utilization; (3) providing more 

flexibility in the qualification 

requirements for supplemental milk 

producers to receive transportation 

credits; and (4) increasing the monthly 

transportation credit assessment rate 

from $0.20 per cwt to $0.30 per cwt. for 

the Southeast order. A final rule in this 

related proceeding (79 FR 12963) is 

being issued simultaneously with this 

termination of proceeding making these 

adjustments permanent in the 

Appalachian and Southeast orders. 

The Department believes that the 

amendments adopted as part of this 

subsequent proceeding addressed the 

disorderly marketing conditions that 

Proposals 2 and 5 were designed to 

remedy. 

Termination of Proceeding 

In view of the foregoing, it is hereby 

determined that subsequent rulemaking 

proceedings have addressed the 

disorderly marketing conditions that 

Proposals 2 and 5 were designed to 

remedy. Accordingly, the proceeding is 

terminated. 

List of Subjects in 7 CFR Parts 1005 and 

1007 

Milk marketing orders. 

Dated: April 28, 2014. 

Rex A. Barnes, 

Associate Administrator, Agricultural 

Marketing Service. 

[FR Doc. 2014–10033 Filed 5–1–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–02–P 

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

Federal Aviation Administration 

14 CFR Part 39 

[Docket No. FAA–2014–0258; Directorate 

Identifier 2013–NM–065–AD] 

RIN 2120–AA64 

Airworthiness Directives; Dassault 

Aviation Airplanes 

AGENCY: Federal Aviation 

Administration (FAA), DOT. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

(NPRM). 

SUMMARY: We propose to adopt a new 

airworthiness directive (AD) for certain 

DASSAULT AVIATION Model 

FALCON 900EX airplanes. This 

proposed AD was prompted by our 

determination to introduce a corrosion 

prevention control program, among 

other changes, to the maintenance 

requirements and airworthiness 

limitations. This proposed AD would 

require revising the maintenance or 

inspection program, as applicable, to 

include the maintenance tasks and 

airworthiness limitations specified in 

the Airworthiness Limitations section of 

the airplane maintenance manual. We 

are proposing this AD to prevent 

reduced structural integrity and reduced 

controllability of the airplane. 

DATES: We must receive comments on 

this proposed AD by June 16, 2014. 

ADDRESSES: You may send comments by 

any of the following methods: 

• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to 

http://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 

instructions for submitting comments. 

• Fax: (202) 493–2251. 

• Mail: U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 

30, West Building Ground Floor, Room 

W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 

Washington, DC 20590. 

• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of 

Transportation, Docket Operations, M– 

30, West Building Ground Floor, Room 

W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., 

Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5 

p.m., Monday through Friday, except 

Federal holidays. 

For service information identified in 

this proposed AD, contact Dassault 

Falcon Jet, P.O. Box 2000, South 

Hackensack, NJ 07606; telephone 201– 

440–6700; Internet http://

www.dassaultfalcon.com. You may 

view this referenced service information 

at the FAA, Transport Airplane 

Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., 

Renton, WA. For information on the 

availability of this material at the FAA, 

call 425–227–1221. 

Examining the AD Docket 

You may examine the AD docket on 

the Internet at http://

www.regulations.gov by searching for 

and locating Docket No. FAA–2014– 

0258; or in person at the Docket 

Management Facility between 9 a.m. 

and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday, 

except Federal holidays. The AD docket 

contains this proposed AD, the 

regulatory evaluation, any comments 

received, and other information. The 

street address for the Docket Operations 

office (telephone (800) 647–5527) is in 

the ADDRESSES section. Comments will 

be available in the AD docket shortly 

after receipt. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Tom 

Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer, 

International Branch, ANM–116, 

Transport Airplane Directorate, FAA, 

1601 Lind Avenue SW., Renton, WA 

98057–3356; telephone (425) 227–1137; 

fax (425) 227–1149. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Comments Invited 

We invite you to send any written 

relevant data, views, or arguments about 

this proposed AD. Send your comments 

to an address listed under the 

ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No. 

FAA–2014–0258; Directorate Identifier 

2013–NM–065–AD’’ at the beginning of 

your comments. We specifically invite 

comments on the overall regulatory, 

economic, environmental, and energy 

aspects of this proposed AD. We will 

consider all comments received by the 

closing date and may amend this 

proposed AD based on those comments. 

We will post all comments we 

receive, without change, to http://

www.regulations.gov, including any 

personal information you provide. We 

will also post a report summarizing each 

substantive verbal contact we receive 

about this proposed AD. 

Discussion 

The European Aviation Safety Agency 

(EASA), which is the Technical Agent 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
25034 Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 85 / Friday, May 2, 2014 / Proposed Rules 

for the Member States of the European 

Community, has issued EASA 

Airworthiness Directive 2013–0051, 

dated March 4, 2013 (referred to after 

this as the Mandatory Continuing 

Airworthiness Information, or ‘‘the 

MCAI’’), to correct an unsafe condition 

for the specified products. The MCAI 

states: 

The airworthiness limitations and 

maintenance requirements for the Falcon 

900EX type design are included in Dassault 

Aviation Aircraft Maintenance Manual 

(AMM) chapter 5–40 and are approved by the 

European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA). 

EASA issued AD 2008–0221 [http://

ad.easa.europa.eu/blob/easa_ad_2008_0221_

Corrected.pdf/AD_2008–0221_1] to require 

accomplishment of the maintenance tasks, 

and implementation of the airworthiness 

limitations, as specified in Dassault Aviation 

F900EX AMM chapter 5–40 referenced DGT 

113874 at revision 8. 

Since that [EASA] AD was issued, Dassault 

Aviation issued revision 12 of F900EX AMM 

chapter 5–40 which contains new or more 

restrictive maintenance requirements and/or 

airworthiness limitations and introduces, 

among others, the following changes: 

—Tasks renumbering, 

—Introduction of a Corrosion Prevention 

Control Program (CPCP), 

—Upgrade of screwjack of flap actuators from 

the older to the latest ¥3 version; 

—Revised Time Between Overhaul for 

screwjack of flap actuators ¥3 version; 

—Revised interval for checking the screw/nut 

play on screwjack of flap actuators ¥3 

version; 

—Removal of service life limit for screwjack 

of flap actuators; 

—Test of flap asymmetry protection system. 

Compliance with this test is required by [a 

certain French AD * * *, which 

corresponds to FAA AD 2002–23–20, 

Amendment 39–12964 (67 FR 71098, 

November 29, 2002)], but F900EX AMM 

chapter 5–40 at revision 12 introduces an 

extended inspection interval; 

—Inspection procedures of fuselage and 

wings; 

—Check of overpressure tightness on 

pressurization control regulating valves. 

Compliance with this check is required by 

EASA AD 2008–0072 [http://

ad.easa.europa.eu/blob/easa_ad_2008_

0072.pdf/AD_2008–0072_1, which 

corresponds to FAA AD 2010–26–05, 

Amendment 39–16544 (75 FR 79952, 

December 21, 2010)], but F900EX AMM 

chapter 5–40 at revision 12 introduces an 

extended inspection interval; 

—Check of overpressure relief valve vacuum 

supply lines. The maintenance tasks and 

airworthiness limitations, as specified in 

the F900EX AMM chapter 5–40, have been 

identified as mandatory actions for 

continued airworthiness of the F900EX 

type design. Failure to comply with AMM 

chapter 5–40 at revision 12 may result in 

an unsafe condition [e.g., reduced 

structural integrity and reduced 

controllability of the airplane]. 

For the reasons described above, this 

[EASA] AD requires the implementation of 

the maintenance tasks and airworthiness 

limitations, as specified in the Dassault 

Aviation F900EX AMM chapter 5–40 DGT 

113874 at revision 12. 

You may examine the MCAI in the 

AD docket on the Internet at http://

www.regulations.gov by searching for 

and locating it in Docket No. FAA– 

2014–0258. 

Relevant Service Information 

Dassault Aviation has issued Chapter 

5–40, Airworthiness Limitations, DGT 

113874, Revision 12, dated September 

2012, of the Falcon 900EX Maintenance 

Manual. The actions described in this 

service information are intended to 

correct the unsafe condition identified 

in the MCAI. 

FAA’s Determination and Requirements 

of This Proposed AD 

This product has been approved by 

the aviation authority of another 

country, and is approved for operation 

in the United States. Pursuant to our 

bilateral agreement with the State of 

Design Authority, we have been notified 

of the unsafe condition described in the 

MCAI and service information 

referenced above. We are proposing this 

AD because we evaluated all pertinent 

information and determined an unsafe 

condition exists and is likely to exist or 

develop on other products of the same 

type design. 

This AD requires revisions to certain 

operator maintenance documents to 

include new actions (e.g., inspections). 

Compliance with these inspections is 

required by 14 CFR 91.403(c). For 

airplanes that have been previously 

modified, altered, or repaired in the 

areas addressed by these actions, the 

operator may not be able to accomplish 

the actions described in the revisions. In 

this situation, to comply with 14 CFR 

91.403(c), the operator must request 

approval for an alternative method of 

compliance according to paragraph (j)(1) 

of this AD. The request should include 

a description of changes to the required 

inspections that will ensure the 

continued operational safety of the 

airplane. 

Costs of Compliance 

We estimate that this proposed AD 

affects 72 airplanes of U.S. registry. 

We estimate the following costs to 

comply with this proposed AD: 

ESTIMATED COSTS

Action Labor cost Parts cost Cost per 

product 

Cost on U.S. 

operators 

Maintenance Program Revision .......................... 1 work-hour × $85 per hour = $85 ..................... $0 $85 $6,120 

Authority for This Rulemaking 

Title 49 of the United States Code 

specifies the FAA’s authority to issue 

rules on aviation safety. Subtitle I, 

section 106, describes the authority of 

the FAA Administrator. ‘‘Subtitle VII: 

Aviation Programs,’’ describes in more 

detail the scope of the Agency’s 

authority. 

We are issuing this rulemaking under 

the authority described in ‘‘Subtitle VII, 

Part A, Subpart III, Section 44701: 

General requirements.’’ Under that 

section, Congress charges the FAA with 

promoting safe flight of civil aircraft in 

air commerce by prescribing regulations 

for practices, methods, and procedures 

the Administrator finds necessary for 

safety in air commerce. This regulation 

is within the scope of that authority 

because it addresses an unsafe condition 

that is likely to exist or develop on 

products identified in this rulemaking 

action. 

Regulatory Findings 

We determined that this proposed AD 

would not have federalism implications 

under Executive Order 13132. This 

proposed AD would not have a 

substantial direct effect on the States, on 

the relationship between the national 

Government and the States, or on the 

distribution of power and 

responsibilities among the various 

levels of government. 

For the reasons discussed above, I 

certify this proposed regulation: 

1. Is not a ‘‘significant regulatory 

action’’ under Executive Order 12866; 

2. Is not a ‘‘significant rule’’ under the 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures 

(44 FR 11034, February 26, 1979); 

3. Will not affect intrastate aviation in 

Alaska; and 

4. Will not have a significant 

economic impact, positive or negative, 

on a substantial number of small entities 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 79, No. 85 / Friday, May 2, 2014 / Proposed Rules 25035 

under the criteria of the Regulatory 

Flexibility Act. 

List of Subjects in 14 CFR Part 39 

Air transportation, Aircraft, Aviation 

safety, Incorporation by reference, 

Safety. 

The Proposed Amendment 

Accordingly, under the authority 

delegated to me by the Administrator, 

the FAA proposes to amend 14 CFR part 

39 as follows: 

PART 39—AIRWORTHINESS 

DIRECTIVES 

■ 1. The authority citation for part 39 

continues to read as follows: 

Authority: 49 U.S.C. 106(g), 40113, 44701. 

§ 39.13 [Amended] 

■ 2. The FAA amends § 39.13 by adding 

the following new AD: 

Dassault Aviation: Docket No. FAA–2014– 

0258; Directorate Identifier 2013–NM– 

065–AD. 

(a) Comments Due Date 

We must receive comments by June 16, 

2014. 

(b) Affected ADs 

This AD affects AD 2002–23–20, 

Amendment 39–12964 (67 FR 71098, 

November 29, 2002), and AD 2010–26–05, 

Amendment 39–16544 (75 FR 79952, 

December 21, 2010). 

(c) Applicability 

This AD applies to Dassault Aviation 

Model FALCON 900EX airplanes, certificated 

in any category, serial number 1 through 96 

inclusive, and serial number 98 through 119 

inclusive. 

(d) Subject 

Air Transport Association (ATA) of 

America Code 05, Time Limits/Maintenance 

Checks. 

(e) Reason 

This AD was prompted by our 

determination to introduce a corrosion 

prevention control program, among other 

changes, to the maintenance requirements 

and airworthiness limitations. We are issuing 

this AD to prevent reduced structural 

integrity and reduced controllability of the 

airplane. 

(f) Compliance 

Comply with this AD within the 

compliance times specified, unless already 

done. 

(g) Revision of Maintenance Program 

Within 30 days after the effective date of 

this AD, revise the maintenance or inspection 

program, as applicable, to incorporate the 

information specified in Chapter 5–40, 

Airworthiness Limitations, DGT 113874, 

Revision 12, dated September 2012, of the 

Falcon 900EX Maintenance Manual. The 

initial compliance time for accomplishing the 

actions specified in Chapter 5–40, 

Airworthiness Limitations, DGT 113874, 

Revision 12, dated September 2012, of the 

Falcon 900EX Maintenance Manual, is 

within the applicable times specified in that 

maintenance manual, or 30 days after the 

effective date of this AD, whichever occurs 

later, except as provided by paragraphs (g)(1) 

through (g)(4) of this AD. 

(1) The term ‘‘LDG’’ in the ‘‘First 

Inspection’’ column of any table in the 

service information means total airplane 

landings. 

(2) The term ‘‘FH’’ in the ‘‘First Inspection’’ 

column of any table in the service 

information means total flight hours. 

(3) The term ‘‘FC’’ in the ‘‘First Inspection’’ 

column of any table in the service 

information means total flight cycles. 

(4) The term ‘‘M’’ in the ‘‘First Inspection’’ 

column of any table in the service 

information means months. 

(h) Terminating Action 

Accomplishing paragraph (g) of this AD 

terminates the requirements of AD 2002–23– 

20, Amendment 39–12964 (67 FR 71098, 

November 29, 2002); and paragraph (g)(1) of 

AD 2010–26–05, Amendment 39–16544 (75 

FR 79952, December 21, 2010); for Dassault 

Aviation Model FALCON 900EX airplanes, 

serial number 1 to 96 inclusive, and serial 

number 98 to 119 inclusive. 

(i) No Alternative Actions and Intervals 

After accomplishing the revision required 

by paragraph (g) of this AD, no alternative 

actions (e.g., inspections) or intervals may be 

used unless the actions or intervals are 

approved as an alternative method of 

compliance (AMOC) in accordance with the 

procedures specified in paragraph (j)(1) of 

this AD. 

(j) Other FAA AD Provisions 

The following provisions also apply to this 

AD: 

(1) Alternative Methods of Compliance 

(AMOCs): The Manager, International 

Branch, ANM–116, FAA, has the authority to 

approve AMOCs for this AD, if requested 

using the procedures found in 14 CFR 39.19. 

In accordance with 14 CFR 39.19, send your 

request to your principal inspector or local 

Flight Standards District Office, as 

appropriate. If sending information directly 

to the International Branch, send it to ATTN: 

Tom Rodriguez, Aerospace Engineer, 

International Branch, ANM–116, Transport 

Airplane Directorate, FAA, 1601 Lind 

Avenue SW., Renton, WA 98057–3356; 

telephone (425) 227–1137; fax (425) 227– 

1149. Information may be emailed to: 9- 

ANM-116-AMOC-REQUESTS@faa.gov. 

Before using any approved AMOC, notify 

your appropriate principal inspector, or 

lacking a principal inspector, the manager of 

the local flight standards district office/

certificate holding district office. The AMOC 

approval letter must specifically reference 

this AD. 

(2) Airworthy Product: For any requirement 

in this AD to obtain corrective actions from 

a manufacturer, use these actions if they are 

FAA-approved. Corrective actions are 

considered FAA-approved if they were 

approved by the State of Design Authority (or 

its delegated agent, or the DAH with a State 

of Design Authority’s design organization 

approval). You are required to ensure the 

product is airworthy before it is returned to 

service. 

(k) Related Information 

(1) Refer to Mandatory Continuing 

Airworthiness Information (MCAI) EASA 

Airworthiness Directive 2013–0051, dated 

March 4, 2013, for related information. This 

MCAI may be found in the AD docket on the 

Internet at http://www.regulations.gov by 

searching for and locating it in Docket No. 

FAA–2014–0258. 

(2) For service information identified in 

this AD, contact Dassault Falcon Jet, P.O. Box 

2000, South Hackensack, NJ 07606; 

telephone 201–440–6700; Internet http://

www.dassaultfalcon.com. You may view this 

service information at the FAA, Transport 

Airplane Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW., 

Renton, WA. For information on the 

availability of this material at the FAA, call 

425–227–1221. 

Issued in Renton, Washington, on April 25, 

2014. 

Jeffrey E. Duven, 

Manager, Transport Airplane Directorate, 

Aircraft Certification Service. 

[FR Doc. 2014–10059 Filed 5–1–14; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4910–13–P 

DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND 

URBAN DEVELOPMENT 

24 CFR Part 3284 

[Docket No. FR–5721–P–01] 

RIN 2502–AJ19 

Manufactured Housing Program Fee: 

Proposed Fee Increase 

AGENCY: Office of the Assistant 

Secretary for Housing—Federal Housing 

Commissioner, HUD. 

ACTION: Proposed rule. 

SUMMARY: This rule proposes to revise 

HUD’s Manufactured Housing Program 

Fee regulations to raise the fee for each 

transportable section of a manufactured 

home that the manufacturer produces in 

accordance with HUD’s Manufactured 

Home Construction and Safe Standards. 

The fee, referred to as a label fee, is 

currently set at $39. HUD 

appropriations acts since 2002 have 

authorized HUD to modify this fee but 

HUD has not raised this fee since 2002. 

For the reasons presented in the 

preamble to this rule, HUD is proposing 

to raise the label fee to an amount 

anticipated to be no less than $95 and 

no more than $105. 

DATES: Comment Due Date: June 2, 

2014. 


TKELLEY on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS