alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification of Nevada Classic Thoroughbreds, Inc.  pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  regarding Annual Report on Form 10-KSB  for the year ended June 30, 2005**

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title  18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Nevada Classic  Thoroughbreds, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company"), doeshereby certify that, based upon his knowledge:

1. The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended    June 30, 2005 (the "Form 10-KSB") fully complies with the    requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. Information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of  the Company.

> 
 

| Dated: October 25, 2005 | By: /s/ Brad Brimhall   |
|-------------------------|-------------------------|
|                    |                         |
|                    | Brad Brimhall           |
|                    | Chief Executive Officer |

>
_________________________________________ 

 

 

 

Order Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan 

October 31, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice 

131585 Michael F. Cavanagh 

Elizabeth A. Weaver 

Marilyn Kelly 

Maura D. Corrigan 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

Robert P. Young, Jr. 

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices 

v SC: 131585 

 COA: 270071 

Kent CC: 04-007101-FC 

LOREN PETER WYNSMA, 04-008774-FC 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 5, 2006 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that 

the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

l1023 

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

October 31, 2006 

 Clerk
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**CertificationPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofAXT, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Wilson W. Cheung, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), that, to the best of myknowledge:

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: November 8, 2005 | By:    | /s/ Wilson W. Cheung    |
|------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                         |   | Wilson W. Cheung        |
|                         |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EMERY and SANDY DENTS :

: CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-CV-4303

Plaintiffs, :

:

v. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION;

BAYER AG;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE;

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM

:

:

:

:

:

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

:

Defendants. :

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of the Court:

Kindly enter the appearances of Hope S. Freiwald, Aline Fairweather, Erin

Brennan and Kirstin J. Miller as attorneys for defendant SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a

GlaxoSmithKline.

Respectfully Submitted,

_____________________________ _____________________________

Hope S. Freiwald Aline Fairweather

_____________________________ _____________________________

Erin Brennan Kirstin J. Miller

DECHERT PRICE & RHOADS

4000 Bell Atlantic Tower

1717 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2793

(215) 994-4000

Case 2:02-cv-04303-WY Document 7 Filed 09/20/2002 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
I, John F. Burke, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Annuity and Life Re(Holdings), Ltd.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement ofa material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements weremade, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrantas of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, includingits consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as ofthe end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;and
     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’smost recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in thecase of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reporting whichare reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability torecord, process, summarize and report financial information; and
     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.      Date:  May 17, 2004
Exhibit 13.2
**CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**
     In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Gemplus InternationalS.A. (the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), FransSpaargaren, as Chief Financial Officer, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:
     (1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;and
     (2) The information contained in theReport fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company.
Date: June 30, 2004     /s/ Frans Spaargaren   Frans Spaargaren Chief Financial Officer
Search the       Online Bookstore fortitles available for purchase:  Advanced       Search | Search TipsMainBest       SellersWhat's NewSpecial ValuesSpecial       CollectionsBrowse       SubjectsSearchHelp & ContactLOGIN LoginSUBSCRIBE Sign up to get             notified of new publications of interest to you. BROWSE 
View All             Subjects
OTHER GPO SITES GPO             AccessGPO             HomepageBen's Guide to             U.S. Government
Main       > Browse by       Subject > Weather
Weather
Sign up to receive Weather email updates.

Mariners       Weather Log 

Publisher: Commerce       Dept., NOAA, National Environmental Satellite, Data and Information       Service, National Oceanographic Data Center 

Description: Triannual       periodical. Subscription price covers issues for 1 year. Subscription       service begins with the first issue after the order is processed. Copies       of the latest issue are retained in stock for individual purchase. Single       copy, $14.00 foreign single copy, $19.60. Furnishes information on the       weather affecting marine commerce. MWL. File Code 2R. Item 275-D. 

Price: $19.00 

Weather       For Aircrews 

Publisher: Defense       Dept., Air Force 

Description: AFM 11-203,       V. 1. Flying Operations. Familiarizes the aircrew member with fundamentals       of weather. Serves as a text for undergraduate pilot and navigator       training programs, all United States Air Force instrument refresher       training and flight instruction programs, and various unit and individual       flying training programs. Provides weather guidance for visual and       instrument flight under most circumstances. Item 0424-F-06. 

Year/Pages: 1997: 181       p.; ill. 

Price: $24.00 
« Return to Main Browse       by Subject Page      [ Top       ]
Main | Best Sellers |       What's New | Special Values | Special       Collections | Browse Subjects |       Search | Help & Contact

U.S. Government       Printing Office · 732 N. Capitol Street, NW · Washington, DC       20401About |       Privacy |       Accessibility       | Security/subjects/sb-234.jsp       Last updated: February 2, 2009
Ex.-99.1 a)

INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS REPORT

To Cendant Mortgage Corporation:

We have examined management's assertion about Cendant Mortgage Corporation's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards identified in the Mortgage
Bankers Association of America's UNIFORM SINGLE ATTESTATION PROGRAM FOR MORTGAGE
BANKERS (USAP) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2001 included in the
accompanying management assertion. Management is responsible for Cendant
Mortgage Corporation's compliance with those minimum servicing standards. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion about the
entity's compliance based on our examination

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, included
examining, on a test basis, evidence about Cendant Mortgage Corporation's
compliance with the minimum servicing standards and performing such other
procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
examination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does
not provide a legal determination on Cendant Mortgage Corporation's compliance
with the minimum servicing standards.

In our opinion, management's assertion that Cendant Mortgage Corporation
complied with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the
year ended December 31, 2001 is fairly stated, in all material respects.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

February 15, 2002
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Integrated
Healthcare Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2006,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company at the dates and for the period indicated.

     This Certificate has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.


Dated: August 10, 2006                        By:  /s/ Bruce Mogel
                                                  ---------------
                                                  Bruce Mogel
                                                  Chief Executive Officer


                                       38
No. 57208. protest 191215-K (New York).

#### Barnett International Forwarders, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

From an examination of the papers in the case the court was unable to find anything to overcome the presumption of correctness of the collector’s classification. The protest was therefore overruled.
# U n i ted S t a te s C o u r t o f A ppe a l s F OR T HE D IS TRICT OF C OLUM BIA C IRCUI T

___ ___ ___ ___ 

## No. 22-7170 September Term, 2022 1: 22-c v -031 62-UNA Filed O n: June 16 , 20 23 Denys Namystiuk,

App ellant
v
. Russian Fede ration an d V ladim ir Putin, Com ma nde r-in-C hief

of the Arm ed Forces o f Russian Fede ration ,

App ellees

ON A PP EALF R OM TH E U N ITED STA TES D ISTR IC T C OU RT F OR TH E D ISTR IC T OF C OL U MB IA BEFORE: Mill ett and Pillard, Circuit Ju dges, a nd Sen telle, Sen ior Circuit

Judge J U D G M E N T Thi s ap pe al w as co nsid ered on the reco rd f ro m the U nite d S tates D istrict C ou rt for the D istrict of Co lumbi a a nd the b rie f f ile d b y ap pe lla nt. Se e F ed . R. A pp . P. 34 (a )(2 ); D .C . Ci r. R ule 34 (j). It is OR D ER ED A N D A D JU D GE D that the distri ct cour t’s N ov embe r 17 , 202 2, orde r be aff irmed . The F oreig n S ov ereig n Imm un ities Act (“F SIA”), “if it ap pli es, is the ‘sole ba sis for ob tain ing jur isdi ction ov er a foreig n state in fede ra l cou rt.’” Sa manta r v
. You suf, 56 0 U .S. 30 5, 31 4 (2 01 0) (qu otin g A rg en tine R ep ub lic v . Amera daH ess Sh ipp ing C or p., 48 8 U .S. 42 8, 43 9 (1 98 9) ); see 28 U .S.C . §§ 1 33 0( a) , 160 4; see alsoSa manta r, 56 0 U .S. at 3 24 –2 5 (reco gn izin g tha t some actio ns a ga inst forei gn off icia ls, w hich are no t cov ered by the p lai n text of

the F SIA , shou ld n ev er the less b e dismisse d p ursua nt to the F SIA be cau se the y

“sho uld be trea ted as actio ns a ga inst the foreig n state itself, as the state is therea l pa rty in in tere st”). Thedistri ct cour t pro pe rly dismisse d a pp ell an t’s compla int for lack o f jur isdi ction be cau se h e failed to all eg e facts tha t coul d su pp or

t the in feren ce tha t any of the ex cep tion s to sov ereig n immunity en umera ted in the F SIA ap pli es. Se e S imon v . Re pu bli c of H un ga ry , 812 F .3d 12 7, 14 1 (D .C . Ci r. 20 16 ).

# U n i ted S t a te s C o u r t o f A ppe a l s F OR T HE D IS TRICT OF C OLUM BIA C IRCUI T

___ ___ ___ ___ 

## No. 22-7170 September Term, 2022

Pu rsu an t to D .C . Ci rcu it R ule 36 , this disp ositio n w ill n ot bepu bli she d. The C ler k is directe d to w ithh old issua nceof the m an da te he re in u ntil se v en da ys aft er reso lutio n of any tim ely pe tition for

reh ea rin g o r pe tition for reh ea rin g e n b an c. SeeF ed . R. A pp . P. 41 (b ); D .C . Ci r. R ule 41

. Pe r C u riam
FOR THE COURT: Mark J. La nger, Clerk BY: /s/ Daniel J. Reidy Depu ty Cl erk

Page 2
##### 



Exhibit 32.0 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 The certification set forth below is being submitted in connection with the Quarterly Report of CSK
Auto Corporation on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending May 2, 2004 (the Report) for the purpose of
complying with Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d -14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
Exchange Act) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code. Maynard L. Jenkins, the Chief Executive Officer and Don W. Watson, the Chief Financial Officer of
CSK Auto Corporation, each certifies that to the best of their knowledge:  (1)
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of CSK Auto Corporation. /s/ Maynard L. Jenkins Maynard L. Jenkins
Chief Executive Officer June 10, 2005 /s/ Don W. Watson Don W. Watson
Chief Financial Officer June 10, 2005
No. 64063.

protests 59/18826, etc. (Galveston).

#### General Twine Corporation et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of loosely twisted ropelike material the same in all material respects as that the subject of *General Twine Corp.*v. *United States*(42 Cust. Ct. 121, C.D. 2075), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
# C_2018104EN.01003401.xml

| 19.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 104/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 104/34

---

Judgment of the General Court of 1 February 2018 — Aldi Einkauf v EUIPO — Schwamm & Cie. (Le Coq de France)

(Case T-457/16) (1)

1

((European Union trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the European Union word mark Le Coq de France - Earlier national figurative mark le coq - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the goods and services - Similarity of the signs - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 [now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) 2017/1001]))

(2018/C 104/44)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co. OHG (Essen, Germany) (represented by: N. Lützenrath, U. Rademacher, C. Fürsen and N. Bertram, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Schifko and D. Walicka, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Schwamm & Cie. mbH (Saarbrucken, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 15 June 2016 (Case R 1786/2015-4) relating to opposition proceedings between Schwamm & Cie. And Aldi Einkauf.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co. OHG to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Aldi Einkauf GmbH & Co. OHG to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 364, 3.10.2016.

1

---
Exhibit 13.1





OFFICER CERTIFICATIONS

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of América Móvil, S.A.B. de C.V., asociedad anónima bursátil de capital variable organized under the laws of Mexico (the Company), does hereby certify to such officers
knowledge that:

The annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 (the Form 20-F) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: April 24, 2017



/s/ Daniel Hajj AboumradDaniel Hajj AboumradChief Executive Officer


Dated: April 24, 2017



/s/ Carlos José García Moreno ElizondoCarlos José García Moreno ElizondoChief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by
the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 35 Filed 02/26/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 35 Filed 02/26/2007 Page 2 of 2
No. 60417.

protest 265922-K (Seattle).

#### K & L Distributors *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that internal revenue tax and duty were improperly assessed upon six cases of champagne which did not arrive and upon three cases of champagne which arrived empty, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained as to said merchandise.
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk February 1, 2012

p0125 

# Order

February 1, 2012

143565 & (55)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 143565 COA: 298375 Oakland CC: 2009-229465-FH JASON DAVID HELLER, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 19, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. The motion for bond pending appeal is DENIED.
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 198 Filed 02/17/2004 Page 1 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 198 Filed 02/17/2004 Page 2 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 198 Filed 02/17/2004 Page 3 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 198 Filed 02/17/2004 Page 4 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 198 Filed 02/17/2004 Page 5 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 198 Filed 02/17/2004 Page 6 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 198 Filed 02/17/2004 Page 7 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 198 Filed 02/17/2004 Page 8 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 198 Filed 02/17/2004 Page 9 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 198 Filed 02/17/2004 Page 10 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 198 Filed 02/17/2004 Page 11 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 198 Filed 02/17/2004 Page 12 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 198 Filed 02/17/2004 Page 13 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 198 Filed 02/17/2004 Page 14 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 198 Filed 02/17/2004 Page 15 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 198 Filed 02/17/2004 Page 16 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 198 Filed 02/17/2004 Page 17 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 198 Filed 02/17/2004 Page 18 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 198 Filed 02/17/2004 Page 19 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 198 Filed 02/17/2004 Page 20 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 198 Filed 02/17/2004 Page 21 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 198 Filed 02/17/2004 Page 22 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 198 Filed 02/17/2004 Page 23 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 198 Filed 02/17/2004 Page 24 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 198 Filed 02/17/2004 Page 25 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 198 Filed 02/17/2004 Page 26 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 198 Filed 02/17/2004 Page 27 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 198 Filed 02/17/2004 Page 28 of 29
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 198 Filed 02/17/2004 Page 29 of 29