alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

: CIVIL ACTION NOS.

:

WILSON : 02-3878

RETES : 02-3888

LUX, et al. : 02-3904

JACKSON, et al. : 02-3921

GUZZETTA, et al. : 02-3960

FAGAN, et al. : 02-3965

GREEN : 02-3989

NELSON, et al. : 02-4120

ASHTON, et al. : 02-4155

MCNALLY, et al : 02-4159

EVERETT, et al. : 02-4191

CASTELAZ, et al. : 02-4192

PERRY : 02-4249

NAPIER, et al. : 02-4256

POWERS, et al. : 02-4260

SANTOS, et al. : 02-4272

PRICE : 02-4299

SHULDA : 02-4307

:

VS. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION, et al. :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of July, 2002, the Court having been previously

advised that the above action cannot proceed to trial and disposition because of the following

reason:

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending disposition of a related

action.

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending determination of

arbitration proceedings.

[ ] - Interlocutory appeal filed.

Case 2:02-cv-04249-HH Document 2 Filed 07/10/2002 Page 1 of 2
[ X ] - Other: Case is placed into suspense pending receipt of the Case

Transfer Order from the Judicial Panel on Multi District Litigation

transferring case to District of Minnesota.

It is

ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this action closed for statistical purposes and

place the matter in the Civil Suspense File, and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction; and that the case be

restored to the trial docket when the action is in a status so that it may proceed to final

disposition; this order shall not prejudice the rights of the parties to this litigation.

BY THE COURT:

________________________________________

Herbert J. Hutton, Judge

Case 2:02-cv-04249-HH Document 2 Filed 07/10/2002 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 99.1  Officer's Certificate as to Compliance for the Series
              2000-8 Certificates dated as of March 21, 2001

              WASHINGTON MUTUAL MORTGAGE SECURITIES CORP.
                         OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE

     The undersigned officer of Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities
Corp., formerly PNC Mortgage Securities Corp., a Delaware corporation
(the "Company") hereby certifies on behalf of the Company and on his
own behalf for purposes of the Company's Mortgage Pass-Through
Certificates, Series 2000-8, as follows:
     1.   I am the duly appointed, qualified and acting Second Vice
          President of the Company.
     2.   Capitalized terms used and not defined herein shall have the
          meanings ascribed to such terms in the Pooling and Servicing Agreement
          related to the above-referenced series of Certificates.
     3.   I am duly authorized to execute and deliver this Officer's
          Certificate on behalf of the Company.
     4.   A review of the activities of the Master Servicer during the
          preceding calendar year and performance under this Agreement has been
          made under my supervision.
     5.   To the best of my knowledge, based on such review, the Master
          Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement
          throughout such year.
     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have signed my name as of March 21, 2001.


                              By:  /s/ Richie Moore
                                   ---------------------
                                   Richie Moore
                                   Second Vice President
CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF

                                                     JVWEB, INC.

         First:  The name of the Corporation is JVWEB, INC.
         ------

         Second:  Upon the filing hereof,  the Fourth Article of the Certificate
of  Incorporation  of the  Corporation  is  hereby  amended  to add a new  final
paragraph to such Article, which shall read as follows:

                  "F. Upon the effectiveness of the filing with the Secretary of
         State of  Delaware  of  Articles of  Amendment  to the  Certificate  of
         Incorporation   adding   this   paragraph   to   the   Certificate   of
         Incorporation,  each  seven  (7)  shares  of Common  Stock  issued  and
         outstanding  immediately  prior  to the  filing  of  such  Articles  of
         Amendment as aforesaid  shall be combined into one (1) share of validly
         issued,  fully  paid  and  non-assessable  Common  Stock.  As  soon  as
         practicable  after such date, the Corporation  shall request holders of
         the Common  Stock to be combined in  accordance  with the  preceding to
         surrender   certificates   representing   their  Common  Stock  to  the
         Corporation's authorized agent, and each such stockholder shall receive
         upon such  surrender  one or more stock  certificates  to evidence  and
         represent   the  number  of  shares  of  Common  Stock  to  which  such
         stockholder  is entitled after the  combination of shares  provided for
         herein;  provided,  however,  that  this  Corporation  shall  not issue
         fractional  shares of Common Stock in connection with this combination,
         but, in lieu thereof, shall make a cash payment equal to the product of
         the  closing  sale price of the Common  Stock on the last  trading  day
         prior  to  the  effective  date  of  the  filing  of  this  instrument,
         multiplied  by  the  number  of  shares  of  Common  Stock  issued  and
         outstanding  immediately  prior to the filing of this  instrument  that
         would otherwise comprise the fractional share of Common Stock."

         Third:  The  amendment  set forth  hereinabove  was duly  adopted in
Accordance  with  Section 242 of the Delaware General Corporation Law.

         Fourth:  The  amendment  will become  effective on February 5, 2001 at
12:01 a.m. in  accordance  with the provision of Section 103(d) of the Delaware
General Corporation Law.

         THE  UNDERSIGNED,  being  the  President  of the  Corporation,  for the
purpose of amending the Certificate of Incorporation  of the  Corporation,  does
make this Certificate,  hereby declaring and certifying that this is the act and
deed of the  Corporation  and the facts herein stated are true, and  accordingly
have hereunto set his hand this 31st day of January, 2001.


                                                      /s/  Greg J. Micek
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                      Greg J. Micek, President
# C_2018166EN.01000502.xml

| 14.5.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 166/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.5.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 166/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 15 March 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — Deichmann SE v Hauptzollamt Duisburg

(Case C-256/16) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Admissibility - Anti-dumping - Validity of a regulation seeking to implement a judgment of the Court declaring previous regulations invalid - Obligation to implement - Legal basis - Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 - Article 14 - Setting of the criteria relating to the collection of anti-dumping duties by Member States - Direction suspending the repayment of anti-dumping duties by national customs authorities - Resumption of the proceeding that preceded the regulations declared invalid - Article 10 - Non-retroactivity - Community Customs Code - Article 221 - Time-bar - Article 236 - Repayment of duties not owed))

(2018/C 166/06)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Finanzgericht Düsseldorf

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Deichmann SE

Applicant:

Defendant: Hauptzollamt Duisburg

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Consideration of the question referred has not revealed any factor capable of affecting the validity of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2016/223 of 17 February 2016 establishing a procedure for assessing certain market economy treatment and individual treatment claims made by exporting producers from China and Vietnam, and implementing the judgment of the Court of Justice in Joined Cases C-659/13 and C-34/14.

---

(1)  OJ C 260, 18.7.2016.

1

---
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32 (b)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
                      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northland Cable Television, Inc. and
Subsidiary (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form
10-Q"), I, Gary Jones, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that;

      (1) The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a)
      or (15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78(d));
      and

      (2) The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents in all
      material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
      the Company.

DATE: 8-15-05

/s/ GARY S. JONES
    --------------------------------
Gary S. Jones
President
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

A signed original of this written statement will be retained by Northland Cable
Television, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
**Exhibit
      23**








**CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**







We
      consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement
      No. 333-128286 on Form S-3 of our report, dated February 16,
      2007, relating to the financial statements and financial statement schedules
      of
      Vectren Utility Holdings, Inc., appearing in this Annual Report on
      Form 10-K of Vectren Utility Holdings, Inc. for the year ended
      December 31, 2006.







Deloitte
      & Touche, LLP.


Indianapolis,
      Indiana




February
      16, 2007
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 140 Reported in House (RH)]

<DOC>

                                                 Union Calendar No. 326
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 140

                          [Report No. 115-441]

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 11, 2017

             Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources

                            December 6, 2017

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the White Mountain Apache Tribe Water Rights Quantification 
 Act of 2010 to clarify the use of amounts in the WMAT Settlement Fund.

 

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. USE OF FUNDS IN WMAT SETTLEMENT FUND FOR WMAT RURAL WATER 
              SYSTEM.

    (a) Authorization of WMAT Rural Water System.--Section 307(a) of 
the White Mountain Apache Tribe Water Rights Quantification Act of 2010 
(Public Law 111-291; 124 Stat. 3080) is amended in the matter preceding 
paragraph (1) by inserting ``, (b)(2),'' after ``subsections (a)''.
    (b) Funding.--Section 312(b)(2)(C)(i)(III) of the White Mountain 
Apache Tribe Water Rights Quantification Act of 2010 (Public Law 111-
291; 124 Stat. 3093) is amended by striking the period at the end and 
inserting the following: ``, including the planning, design, and 
construction of the WMAT rural water system, in accordance with section 
307(a).''.
                                                 Union Calendar No. 326

115th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 140

                          [Report No. 115-441]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 To amend the White Mountain Apache Tribe Water Rights Quantification 
 Act of 2010 to clarify the use of amounts in the WMAT Settlement Fund.

_______________________________________________________________________

                            December 6, 2017

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 
                       and ordered to be printed
```
[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 17-11125

Non-Argument Calendar

________________________

D.C. Docket No. 1:16-cr-20471-CMA-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

JOSE AVILA,

 Defendant-Appellant.

________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

________________________

(September 26, 2018)

Before TJOFLAT, BRANCH and BLACK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Martin A. Feigenbaum, appointed counsel for Jose Avila in this direct 

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the 

Case: 17-11125 Date Filed: 09/26/2018 Page: 1 of 2 
2

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). 

Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of 

the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the 

entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is 

GRANTED, and Avila’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Case: 17-11125 Date Filed: 09/26/2018 Page: 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 17-10573

DEMETRIA GRAY, on behalf of D.S., a Minor, 

 Plaintiff - Appellant

v.

CROWLEY INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, 

 Defendant - Appellee

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 4:15-CV-908

Before REAVLEY, JONES, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The court has carefully considered this appeal in light of the briefs, oral 

argument, and pertinent portions of the record. Having done so, we find no 

reversible error of law. The district court’s judgment is therefore AFFIRMED.

 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 22, 2018

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 17-10573 Document: 00514483271 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/22/2018
Before the Third Division,

May 14, 1962

No. 66760.

#### Commercial Metals Co. *v.*United States,

protest 273926-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of lead scrap recovered from old telephone cables in the Panama Canal Zone and reduced to ingot form solely for convenience in transportation ; that the old telephone cables were of United States origin; that the *451imported lead has not been advanced in value or improved in condition; and that all of the applicable customs regulations have now been complied with, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained. *Bertrand Freres, Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(47 Cust. Ct. 155, C.D. 2296), followed.
Before the First Division,

July 25, 1945

No. 50369.

#### Protests 4879-K, etc., of Elliot Greene & Co., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 63592.

protest 59/1458 (New York).

#### Reeves Instrument Corporation *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Since the protest was filed more than 60 days after liquidation, it was dismissed as untimely, by virtue of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.
No. 53956.

#### V. G. Nahrgang *v.*United States,

protests 137379-K, etc. (Detroit).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

An examination of the record failing to disclose evidence sufficient to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the collector’s classification, the protests were overruled.
# C_2018161EN.01000701.xml

| 7.5.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 161/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.5.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 161/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 6 March 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesgerichtshof — Germany) — Slowakische Republik v Achmea BV

(Case C-284/16) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Bilateral investment treaty concluded in 1991 between the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the Czech and Slovak Federative Republic and still applicable between the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the Slovak Republic - Provision enabling an investor from one Contracting Party to bring proceedings before an arbitral tribunal in the event of a dispute with the other Contracting Party - Compatibility with Articles 18, 267 and 344 TFEU - Concept of ‘court or tribunal’ - Autonomy of EU law))

(2018/C 161/07)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundesgerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Slowakische Republik

Applicant:

Defendant: Achmea BV

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 267 and 344 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding a provision in an international agreement concluded between Member States, such as Article 8 of the Agreement on encouragement and reciprocal protection of investments between the Kingdom of the Netherlands and the Czech and Slovak Federative Republic, under which an investor from one of those Member States may, in the event of a dispute concerning investments in the other Member State, bring proceedings against the latter Member State before an arbitral tribunal whose jurisdiction that Member State has undertaken to accept.

---

(1)  OJ C 296, 16.8.2016.

1

---
Executive Perquisite Plan, Amended and Restated Effective July 1, 2008



 Exhibit 10.74 
 Del Monte Foods Corporation 
 Executive Perquisite Plan 
 Amended and Restated Effective July 1, 2008 
 Purpose 
 The purpose of the Executive Perquisite Plan (Perquisite Plan) is to allow executives flexibility to choose perquisites
tailored to meet their own personal needs, deliver perquisites in a more cost-effective way and encourage a total compensation perspective among executives. 
 Eligibility 
 Executives grade level 40 and above are eligible for the Perquisite Plan. Participation begins on the effective date of
May 1, 2004 or at the time of hire or promotion into an eligible position. 
 Multi-Tier Approach 
 The Perquisite Plan provides a clear differential between different levels of executives: 
  

								
	 Tier
	  	Position	  	 	  	Annual Allowance
	 Tier 1
	  	CEO	  		  	$	42,000
	 Tier 2
	  	EVPs/COO	  		  	$	36,000
	 Tier 3
	  	SVPs	  		  	$	30,000
	 Tier 4
	  	VP III	  		  	$	24,000
	 Tier 5
	  	VP II	  		  	$	18,000
	 Tier 6
	  	VP I	  		  	$	6,000

 Subject to the Tier designations above, the perquisite allowance will be included on a semi-monthly basis in the
executive’s payroll check. 
 Administration 
 This Executive Perquisite Plan shall be administered by the Compensation Committee of the Del Monte Foods Company Board of Directors (Compensation Committee). 
 Amendments or Modifications 
 The foregoing sets forth the Corporation’s current Executive Perquisite Plan
for Executives of Del Monte Corporation. The Compensation Committee may, at any time, amend, modify or terminate this Executive Perquisite Plan in whole or in part.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as created by Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of United Defense
Industries, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers knowledge,
that: (i) the accompanying Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for
the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company. Dated: August 2, 2004
    
    /s/ Francis RabornFrancis Raborn
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 The foregoing certification is being furnished solely to accompany the Report
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, and is not being filed for purposes of Section 18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before
or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in
such filing.
# C_2015414EN.01003201.xml

| 14.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 414/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 414/32

---

Appeal brought on 28 September 2015 by LM against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 14 July 2015 in Case F-109/14, LM v Commission

(Case T-560/15 P)

(2015/C 414/42)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Appellant: LM (Ispra, Italy) (represented by: L. Ribolzi, lawyer)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Other party to the proceedings:

Form of order sought by the appellant

Form of order sought by the appellant

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested order. |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested order.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The present appeal is brought against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 14 July 2015 (Case F-109/14), which dismissed as manifestly unfounded an action seeking an order that the Commission pay the appellant, in respect of the survivor’s pension which she receives, 35 % of the retirement pension received by her former spouse at the time of his death.

In support of her claims, the appellant submits that the Civil Service Tribunal did not examine her request to increase the pension in accordance with Article 25 the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the Treaty of Lisbon, which recognise and respect the right of the elderly to lead a life of dignity and independence and to participate in social and cultural life.

---