alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32
                                                                      ----------

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of Extended Systems
Incorporated on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Charles W. Jepson,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of Extended Systems Incorporated.



/s/ CHARLES W. JEPSON
------------------------------
Charles W. Jepson
Chief Executive Officer
September 6, 2005

<PAGE>



                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly Report of Extended Systems
Incorporated on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Valerie A.
Heusinkveld, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of Extended Systems Incorporated.



/s/ VALERIE A. HEUSINKVELD
------------------------------
Valerie A. Heusinkveld
Chief Financial Officer
September 6, 2005
# C_2017283EN.01000801.xml

| 28.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 283/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 283/8

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 July 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság — Hungary) — Glencore Agriculture Hungary Kft., formerly Glencore Grain Hungary Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatóság

(Case C-254/16) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Common system of value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Article 183 - Principle of fiscal neutrality - Deduction of input tax - Refund of overpaid VAT - Investigation procedure - Fine imposed on the taxable person in the course of such a procedure - Extension of the period within which the refund must be made - Exclusion of payment of default interest))

(2017/C 283/11)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Referring court

Fővárosi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Glencore Agriculture Hungary Kft., formerly Glencore Grain Hungary Kft.

Applicant:

Defendant: Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatóság

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

EU law must be interpreted as precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, under which, where a tax investigation procedure is initiated by a tax authority and where a taxable person is fined for failure to cooperate, the date of the refund of overpaid value added tax may be delayed until the formal report on that investigation is delivered to the taxable person and the payment of default interest may be refused, even where the duration of the tax investigation procedure is excessive and cannot be attributed entirely to the conduct of the taxable person.

---

(1)  OJ C 296, 16.8.2016.

1

---
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



In connection with the accompanying Yearly Report On Form 10-KSB of Genesis Realty Group, Inc. for the Year Ended December 31, 2004, I, Jeffrey Glick, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Genesis Realty Group, Inc. hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to the best of my knowledge and belief, that:



1.Such Yearly Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2.The information contained in such Yearly Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004, fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Genesis Realty Group, Inc.




Dated:  April 14, 2005

GENESIS REALTY GROUP, INC.




By:
        /s/ Jeffrey GlickChief Executive Officer and

Chief Financial Office
June 9, 2015 

Taylor Bloom 

Owner 

Frontdoorphotos 

4717 West Terry Circle 

Holland, MI 49424 

Dear Mr. Bloom: 

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption of 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not process your 

request and what you should do in the next 30 days. 

Why We Can Not Process Your Request 

We entered your March 9, 2015, exemption request on behalf of Frontdoorphotos into the 

public docket (No. FAA-2015-0659), but we are unable to process your request any further. 

The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). 

For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following: 

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the 

relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief. 

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole. 

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption 

would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you 

seek an exemption. 

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request. 

What You Should Do 

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described 

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your 

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2 

If We Do Not Hear From You 

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you 

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst, Airmen and 

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 99.2

    STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
                          2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         The undersigned, Terry Prichard, is the Chief Financial Officer of
Pocahontas Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company").

         This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the
Company of the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
December 31, 2002 (the "Report").

         By execution of this statement, I certify that:

               C)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                    13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
                    U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and

               D)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                    all material respects, the financial condition and results
                    of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
                    periods covered by the Report.

      This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so
      that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report
      is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section
      906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not
      intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

February 14, 2003                                       /s/ Terry Prichard
----------------------                                --------------------------
Dated                                                   Terry Prichard
Order filed, June 19, 2018

.

In The 

## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14

- 18

- 00395

- CR 14

- 18

- 00396

- CR

____________ MARQUS SIRLS , Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 338th District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Cour t Cause No. 1541904 , 1542051



### ORDER

The reporter’s record in this case was due June 18, 2018

. See Tex. R. App. P. 35.1. The court has not received a request to extend time for filing the record. The record has not been filed with the court. Because the reporter’s record h as not been filed timely, we issue the following order.

We order Julia Johnson , the court reporter, to file the record in this appeal
within 15 days of the date of this order

. PER CURIAM
MEMORANDUM 

SUBJECT: 4-3-13 Telephone Call on Processed C&D Wood Contaminant Data 

FROM: Kenneth Dixon

Office of Resource Conservation and Recovery 

TO: Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-RCRA-2013-0110 

On April 3, 2013, EPA held a conference call with CMRA members to ask clarifying questions 

about a revised dataset of processed C&D wood (from a Covanta facility in New York) 

submitted to the agency on March 27, 2013. CMRA submitted the revised dataset in support of 

its request that EPA list processed C&D wood as a categorical non-waste fuel in 40 CFR 

241.4(a). 

Non-EPA participants confirmed that the revised New York dataset included all samples taken at 

Covanta’s Niagara facility between 2005 and 2012, and that all sample values had been crosschecked with laboratory reports to ensure that contaminant data had been recorded on a dry 

basis. Lab reports prior to 2005 are no longer available, in agreement with both Covanta’s and 

its laboratory’s records retention policies. Covanta takes samples of their boiler fuel weekly, and 

any temporal gaps in the dataset are due to periods where the boiler burned fuel other than 

processed C&D wood. 

Non-EPA participants explained why the two highest chlorine values from the previous data 

submission were no longer present. A January 11, 2009, sample previously purported to contain 

9940 ppm chlorine was discovered to be a transcription error. The lab report showing 994 ppm 

chlorine is attached. Similarly, a March 31, 2006, sample previously purported to contain 6460 

ppm chlorine was also discovered to be a transcription error. The lab report showing 646 ppm 

chlorine is attached. 

Covanta shared a list of materials they prohibit their suppliers (i.e., individual C&D processors) 

from including in the fuel sent to Covanta’s energy recovery facility. This list is also attached. 

CMRA participants outlined steps they are taking to similarly revise processed C&D datasets 

from Maine, Massachusetts, Minnesota, and Washington. Revisions will ensure that data is 

appropriately presented on a dry basis to facilitate comparisons with contaminant data for 

traditional fuels. 

Call Participants

Max Lee (CMRA – Koogler & Associates) 

Karl Seltzer (CMRA – Koogler & Associates) 

Andrew Szurgot (Covanta) 

Kenneth Dixon (EPA)
# C_2018112EN.01002901.xml

| 26.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/29

---

Judgment of the General Court of (Ninth Chamber) of 8 February 2018 — POA v European Commission

(Case T-74/16) (1)

1

((Access to documents - Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 - Documents concerning an application for the registration of a name under Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 - Documents originating from the Commission - Documents originating from a Member State - Article 4(5) of Regulation No 1049/2001 - Refusal to grant access - Obligation to state reasons - Exception relating to the protection of the decision-making process - Exception relating to the protection of court proceedings - Extent of review by the institution and the EU Courts of the Member State’s grounds for objection))

(2018/C 112/37)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Pagkyprios organismos ageladotrofon (POA) Dimosia Ltd (Latsia, Cyprus) (represented by: N. Korogiannakis, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J. Baquero Cruz and F. Clotuche-Duvieusart, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought under Article 263 TFEU, seeking annulment of the decision Ares(2015) 5632670 of the Secretary-General of the Commission of 7 December 2015 rejecting the confirmatory application made by letter of 15 September 2015, in which the applicant sought, pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents (OJ 2001 L 145, p. 43), access to documents relating, first, to the application for registration CY/PDO/0005/01243 of ‘Halloumi’ as a protected designation of origin (PDO), in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 1151/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 November 2012 on quality schemes for agricultural products and foodstuffs (OJ 2012 L 343, p. 1), and, second, to the earlier application for registration CY/PDO/0005/00766 of ‘Halloumi’ as a PDO.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Pagkyprios organismos ageladotrofon (POA) Dimosia Ltd to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Pagkyprios organismos ageladotrofon (POA) Dimosia Ltd to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 145, 25.4.2016.

1

---
**Exhibit      32.1**

**Statement      of Chief Executive Officer Furnished**

**Pursuant      to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

|  | A) | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d))                and |
|--|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  | B) | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company                as of the dates and for the periods covered by the                Report. |
|--|----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| May                  12,                  2008                                           Dated | /s/ Kim S.                Price                                             Kim                  S. PricePresident                  and Chief Executive Officer |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
exhib10-4.htm


    
      

      

    

     

    EXHIBIT 10.4

    
 

    ADDENDUM
TO SECURITY AGREEMENT

    DATED
MAY 9, 2008

    


    This Addendum to Security Agreement
(the “Addendum”) dated as of June 18 , 2008  between MEXORO MINERALS
LTD., a Colorado corporation, (“Borrower”), and
Paramount Gold and Silver Corp., a Delaware corporation, (“Lender”).

    


    WHEREAS, the Lender and Borrower are
concurrently entering into a Second Secured Convertible Debenture, dated as of
even date hereof (as amended, modified or supplemented from time to time in
accordance with its term)  pursuant to which the Lender will
make  a loan to the Borrower in the  Principal Amount of
$370,000  pursuant to, and subject to the terms and conditions
thereof; and

    


    WHEREAS,  the Lender and
Borrower have previously executed a Security Agreement dated May 9, 2008 (the
“Security Agreement”); and

    


    WHEREAS,  the parties wish to
amend the Security Agreement  all subject to the terms and conditions
of this Addendum.

    


    NOW THEREFORE,  in
consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein and other good and
valuable consideration, it is agreed:

    


    1.   All funds advanced
to the Borrower pursuant to the Second Secured Convertible Debenture, and all
other future loans or advances made to the Borrower which are to be secured by
the assets of the Borrower shall be subject to the  terms and
conditions as set forth in the Security Agreement.

    


    2.  The terms and conditions
set forth in the Security Agreement are specifically incorporated herewith by
reference.

    


    3.   Borrower undertakes
to execute such further documents as may be requested by Lender in order to
perfect Lender’s security interest in all current and after acquired assets of
the Lender together with the proceeds thereof.

    


    This Addendum is executed this 18th day of
June 2008.

    


    


    


    [SIGNATURE
PAGE FOLLOWS]

    


    IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto
have duly executed this Addendum to the Security Agreement as of the day and
year first above written.

    


    


    Paramount Gold and Silver
Corp.

    


    


    By:           ___________________________

    Name:

    Title:

    


    


    Mexoro Minerals Ltd.

    


    


    By:           ___________________________

    Name:

    Title:

    


    


    


    



    
      
         


      

      
         


        
          

        

      

      
         


      

    


    Schedule
I

    


    


    The
Collateral
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIE DIRECTOR PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of RTG Ventures, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ending August 31, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Linda Perry, Executive Director of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  Date: December 14, 2012/s/ Linda PerryLinda PerryExecutive Director  The foregoing certification accompanied the Annual Report on Form 10-K filing pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350. It is being reproduced herein for information only. It is not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and it is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing. A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER>                                     1,000
<CIK>                                       0001051719
<NAME>                                             UDI

<S>                                         <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          47,423
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  104,768
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    234,773
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               394,512
<PP&E>                                          88,459
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 898,223
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          448,165
<BONDS>                                        200,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,097
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   898,223
<SALES>                                        911,786
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               911,786
<CGS>                                          755,611
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  882,970
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (927)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              29,298
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,527
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,250
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                277
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       277
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>