alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
RECEIVED IN

COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

no. JUL 23 2015

Abet Acosla,Clerk

DAVID BLAINE McKINLEY § IN THE COURT OF

§

v. § CRIMINAL APPEALS

§

THE STATE OF TEXAS § OF TEXAS

FILED-IN

n o TM « t „ C0URT 0F CRIMINAL APPR! Pro Se Motion Requesting Leave to File TM~«rrt«i

An Original Copy Only of the JUL 24 2315

Petition For Discretionary Review

Abel Acosta, Clerk

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS:

COMES NOW the Appellant/Petitioner in the above-styled and numbered cause and

respectfully moves this Honorable Court to grant leave to file an original copy only of the

Petition for Discretionary Review and insupport thereofwould show tothe Court the following: \

1. The style and appeal number in the Waco Court of Appeals is: David Blaine

McKinlev v. The State of Texas. Appeal No. 10-14-00202-CR. And 10-14-00203-CR

2. The Appellant/Petitioner moves that, pursuant to Rule 2, Texas Rules of

Appellate Procedure, this Court suspend Rule 9.3(b), Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, that

requires the filing of eleven (11) copies ofthe Petition for Discretionary Review with the Court. >

3. The facts relied upon to show good cause for this request are, as follows: [The

Appellant is indigent and incarcerated and does not have access to a photo copier.] The

Appellant is presently not represented by counsel and intends to file a Pro Se Petition for

Discretionary Review.

Pro Se Motion Requesting Leave to File An Original Copy Only

of The Petition for Discretionary Review - Page 1
WHEREFORE, PREMISESCONSIDERED, the Appellant/Petitioner respectfully

requests that this Honorable Court grant leave to file anoriginal copy only ofthePetition for

Discretionary Review with the Court.

Respectfully submitted,

David Blaine McKinley

TDCJ #01926785

Stiles Unit

3060 FM 3514

Beaumont, TX 78102

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

The Appellant/Petitioner hereby certifies that a true and correct copy of the foregoing

Motion has been mailed to the District Attorney, Appellate Division, Ellis County, 109 S.

Jackson Street, Waxahachie, Texas 75165,, and mailed via U.S. mail, to the Office ofthe State

Prosecuting Attorney, P.O. Box 12405, Capitol Station, Austin, Texas 78711, on the f~\ day

of JoW ,2015.

David McKinley J

Pro Se Motion Requesting Leave to File An Original Copy Only

of The Petition for Discretionary Review - Page 2
# C_2019139EN.01004301.xml

| 15.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 139/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 139/43

---

Judgment of the General Court of 28 February 2019 — Ateknea Solutions Catalonia v Commission

(Case T-69/16) (1)

(Arbitration clause - Contracts concluded within the sixth framework programme for Research and Technological Development (2002-2006) - Reimbursement of costs incurred by the applicant plus default interest - Eligible costs - Contractual liability)

(2019/C 139/40)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Ateknea Solutions Catalonia, SA (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by M. Troncoso Ferrer, C. Ruxió Claramunt and S. Moya Izquierdo, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by L. Grønfeldt and M. Siekierzyńska, and subsequently by M. Siekierzyńska and R. Lyal, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action based on Article 272 TFEU, seeking an order that the Commission pay the applicant an amount of EUR 1258 533.89 or, in the alternative, an amount of EUR 1025 845.29.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Ateknea Solutions Catalonia, SA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Ateknea Solutions Catalonia, SA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 165, 10.5.2016.

---
STATE OF MAINE OFFICE oF THE GovERNOR

1 STATE HOUSE STATION AUGUSTA, MAINE 04333·0001 Paul R. LePage

GOVERNOR June 6, 2011 

# RECEIVED JUN 0 92011 Ms. Lisa Jackson, Administrator USEPA Headquarters Ariel Rios Building 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N. W. Mail Code: 1101A Washington, DC 20460 RE: State Concurrence with listing the Leeds Metal Site in Leeds Maine, on the National Priorities List Dear Ms. Jackson: Due to the apparent scope ofcontamination and potential clean-up cost atthe former Leeds Metal Site in Leeds, Maine, the State of Maine concurs with EPA's proposed listing ofthis Site on the National Priorities List. This listing will provide needed federal resources underthe Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and LiabilityAct of 1980 (aka Superfund Program) to investigate and remediate threats to local citizens from the PCBs, lead, solvents and other hazardous substances atthe site and in the area groundwater. We trustthatyou will continue to work closely with area businesses and residents, the Maine DEP, and otherinterested parties to develop cost-effective approaches to these efforts. Ifyou have furtherquestions, please contact Patricia Aha, Deputy Commissioneratthe Departmentof Environmental Protection at 207-287-2812.

Sincerely

# v~ta.r~ Paul R. LePage Governor

CC: Patricia Aho, Deputy Commissioner, Maine DEP Curt Spalding, EPA Region 1 Administrator David Wright, Directorof Remediation, Maine DEP

# ~ PRJNl F:D(IN I{FC:YCLED**PAPEI~** PHONE: (207) 287-3531 (Voice) 888-577-6690 (TTY) FAX: (207) 2tl7-JOH www.maine.gov
# MTS Cover

# Table 1

# Table 2

# Figure 1

# Figure 2

# Figure 3

# Figure 4

# Figure 5

# Figure 6

# Figure 7

# Figure 8

# Table 3

# Table 4

# Table 5

# Table 6

# Table 6A

# Table 6B

# Table 6C

# Table 6D

# Table 6E

# Table 7

# Table 8

# Table 9

# image1.emf

# image2.png

# image3.png

# image4.png

# image5.png

# image6.png

# image7.png

# image8.png

# image9.png
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1

                             Crystal Decisions, Inc.
                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                      State or Other Jurisdiction
Name of Subsidiary                                                                          of Incorporation
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<S>                                                                              <C>
Crystal Decisions, Corp.                                                                   New Brunswick, Canada
Crystal Decisions (Japan) K.K.                                                                             Japan
Crystal Decisions (Singapore) Pte Ltd                                                                  Singapore
Crystal Decisions (UK) Limited                                                                 England and Wales
Crystal Decisions (Australia) Pty Limited                                                              Australia
Crystal Decisions (France) S.A.                                                                           France
Crystal Decisions (Deutschland) GmbH                                                                     Germany
Crystal Decisions (Hong Kong) Limited                                                                  Hong Kong
Seagate Software Information Management Group AB                                                          Sweden
Seagate Software Switzerland GmbH                                                                    Switzerland
Seagate Software Information Management Group B.V.                                                   Netherlands
Seagate Software (Italy) S.r.l                                                                             Italy
</TABLE>
U.S. Department 

of Transportation 

Office of the Secretary 

of Transportation 

SamAzad 

City Manager, The City of Pueblo 

Pueblo Memorial Airport 

31201 Bryan Circle, Ste. 200 

Pueblo, Colorado 81001 

Dear Mr. Azad: 

Assistant Secretary 

MAY 18 2015 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Thank you for your most recent letter dated April 28, 2015, regarding Essential Air Service 

("EAS") at Pueblo. As you know, the Consolidated and Further Appropriations Act, 2015, 

Public Law No. 113-235 states, "[T]hat none of the funds in this Act or any other Act shall be 

used to enter into a new contract with a community located less than 40 miles from the nearest 

small hub airport before the Secretary has negotiated with the community over a local cost 

share." As Pueblo is located less than 40 miles from Colorado Springs Airport (COS), a small 

hub, the Department is required to negotiate a local cost share with the community of Pueblo 

before entering into a new EAS contract. 

In your original letter dated March 23, 2015, the City of Pueblo proposed a 2.5 percent local cost 

share for the upcoming EAS contract award. The Department subsequently proposed a counter 

offer of7.5 percent for Pueblo's local share for a new two-year term contract. In your April28 

letter, the City of Pueblo proposed a counter offer of 5 percent for the local cost share. The 

Department has accepted Pueblo's offer and will require a 5 percent contribution of the annual 

subsidy amount for EAS provided by Great Lakes Aviation, Ltd., ($1,776,448) or $88,822, from 

the City of Pueblo. Concurrent with Department practice, subsidy is paid to carriers on a 

monthly basis, in arrears, and the Department will require proof of the City's payment to Great 

Lakes prior to the Department reimbursing Great Lakes. 

The Department wishes to remind the community that only non-airport revenue may be used in 

conjunction with a subsidy to an air carrier. Airport revenue must be used for the operational 

and capital costs of the airport, the local airport system, or other facilities owned or operated by 

the airport owner or operator and directly and substantially related to the air transportation of 

passengers or property. The Federal Aviation Administration's Policy and Procedures 

Concerning the Use of Airport Revenue, 64 Fed. Reg. 7696 (Feb. 16, 1999), provides further 

details, and lists "directly subsidizing air carriers" as one example of unlawful revenue diversion. 
Mr. Sam Azad 

Page2 

As is our standard practice, I am placing a copy of your letter and my response in Docket 

DOT -OST -1999-65 89. 

Cc: Mark Lovin, Director of Aviation 

Sincerely, 

Brandon M. Belford 

Deputy Assistant Secretary for 

Aviation and International Affairs
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       3,703,884
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,740,152
<ALLOWANCES>                                   193,373
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,200,587
<PP&E>                                     158,592,478
<DEPRECIATION>                            (25,514,456)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             154,972,641
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       12,265,954
<BONDS>                                    132,548,782
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        27,270
<OTHER-SE>                                 (8,705,817)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               154,972,641
<SALES>                                     24,758,511
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            24,939,702
<CGS>                                        9,551,700
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               22,591,207
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              (98,281)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           9,976,574
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (7,487,559)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (2,792,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,695,559)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,695,559)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.72)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

March 5, 2012 

h0227 

Order 

 

March 5, 2012 

143969 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 143969 

 COA: 298381 

PARIS DEMOND CAGE, Oakland CC: 2009-228954-FC 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the September 27, 2011 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
**Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record**

**Plant ID 02702**  **Removed from Public**  **(Non-CBI) Docket**  **1 Copyright** 

**Flag 2**  **File Name 3**  **Description** 

### 02702\02702_Certification Statement.pdf Plant certification statement x 

### 02702\02702_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook



### 02702\02702_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist x 

### 02702\02702_PartA.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 02702\02702_PartB.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 02702\02702_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 02702\02702_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 02702\02702_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file x 

### 02702\Supporting Documentation\02702_Part_A-1_GGS_Map-1.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 02702\Supporting Documentation\02702_Part_A-2_GGS_Water_Balance_ Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 02702\Supporting Documentation\02702_Part_C-1_Map-2.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 02702\Supporting Documentation\02702_Part_D-1_GGS_ Pond_System_ Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey x 

### 02702\Supporting Documentation\PDF of Part\02702_Part_A-0_Final_GGS.pdf Plant submitted survey file x 

### 02702\Supporting Documentation\PDF of Part\02702_Part_B_Final_GGS.pdf Plant submitted survey file x 

### 02702\Supporting Documentation\PDF of Part\02702_Part_C-0_Final_GGS.pdf Plant submitted survey file x 

### 02702\Supporting Documentation\PDF of Part\02702_Part_D-0_Final_GGS.pdf Plant submitted survey file x 

### 02702\Supporting Documentation\PDF of Part\02702_Part_H_Final_GGS.pdf Plant submitted survey file

2Copyright documents are available from the docket. 1Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database
.
3No hardcopy log is included for this plant as no hardcopy materials were received.
# C_2016270EN.01001701.xml

| 25.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 270/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 270/17

---

Appeal brought on 11 February 2016 by Hewlett Packard Development Company LP against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 3 December 2015 in Case T-628/14: Hewlett Packard Development Company v EUIPO

(Case C-77/16 P)

(2016/C 270/27)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Hewlett Packard Development Company LP (represented by: T. Raab, Rechtsanwalt, H. Lauf, Rechtsanwalt)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings:

By order of 26 May 2016 the Court of Justice (Tenth Chamber) held that the appeal was inadmissible.

---
<Page>

EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Integrated
Healthcare Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended December 31,
2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company at the dates and for the period indicated

      This Certificate has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.


                                        INTEGRATED HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS, INC.

Dated: February 14, 2008                By:  /s/ Bruce Mogel
                                           ------------------------------
                                           Bruce Mogel
                                           Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
ACCOMPANYING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE 
TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999             JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JUL-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999             MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           6,781                   6,781
<SECURITIES>                                     5,002                   5,002
<RECEIVABLES>                                   10,311                  10,311
<ALLOWANCES>                                       589                     589
<INVENTORY>                                      5,209                   5,209
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                30,297                  30,297
<PP&E>                                          14,289                  14,289
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,748                   5,748
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  40,664                  40,664
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,632                  13,632
<BONDS>                                            321                     321
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             9                       9
<OTHER-SE>                                      26,515                  26,515
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    40,664                  40,664
<SALES>                                         13,388                  36,190
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                13,388                  36,190
<CGS>                                            5,871                  17,389
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    5,871                  17,389
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 6,755                  20,141
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    91                     329
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 182                     552
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    580                 (1,892)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       203                   (377)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                377                 (1,515)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                       377                 (1,515)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.04                  (0.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.04                  (0.18)
        

</TABLE>
Appendix F

Model Performance EvaluationAppendix F.1 MM5 2002 Modeling in Support of VISTASAppendix F.2 Air Quality Model Performance Evaluation for the Great Smokys
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AXT, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007, as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Philip C. S. Yin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), that, to the best of myknowledge:

(1) The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Dated: May 11, 2007 | By:    | /s/ Philip C. S. Yin    |
|---------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                |   | Philip C. S. Yin        |
|                |   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
9-1 A Guide to Federal Government ACH Payments

9 Forms 

This Chapter includes all Green Book forms.

Appendix # Form Title

1. FS Form 133 Notice of Reclamation Form 

2. FS Form 150.1 Payment Trace Request Form 

3. FS Form 1199A Direct Deposit Sign-Up Form 

4. FS Form 1200 Direct Deposit Sign-Up Form 

5. FS Form 2942 Follow-Up To Notice of Reclamation 

6. SF 3881 ACH Vendor/Miscellaneous Payment Enrollment Form
# C_2018301EN.01000201.xml

| 27.8.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 301/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.8.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 301/2

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 5 July 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Szombathelyi Törvényszék — Hungary) — Criminal proceedings against Dániel Bertold Lada

(Case C-390/16) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Judicial cooperation in criminal matters - Framework Decision 2008/675/JHA - Taking account in new criminal proceedings of a previous conviction in another Member State - Special procedure for recognition of a conviction in another Member State - Review and legal reclassification of the earlier decision - Principle of mutual recognition - Article 82(1) TFEU))

(2018/C 301/02)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Szombathelyi Törvényszék

Party to the main proceedings

Dániel Bertold Lada

Operative part of the judgment

Council Framework Decision 2008/675/JHA of 24 July 2008 on taking account of convictions in the Member States of the European Union in the course of new criminal proceedings, read in the light of Article 82 TFEU, must be interpreted as precluding the taking into account in a Member State, in new criminal proceedings brought against a person, of a final judgment previously handed down by a court of another Member State convicting that person of other offences being conditional on a special procedure for prior recognition, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, by the courts of the first Member State.

---

(1)  OJ C 350, 26.9.2016.

---