alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017078EN.01003102.xml

| 13.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 78/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 78/31

---

Order of the General Court of 26 January 2017 — Topera v EUIPO (RHYTHMVIEW)

(Case T-119/16) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Application for the European Union word mark RHYTHMVIEW - Absolute grounds for refusal - No distinctive character - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law))

(2017/C 078/43)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Topera, Inc. (Abbott Park, Illinois, United States) (represented by: H. Sheraton, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: H. O’Neill, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 January 2016 (Case R 1368/2015-4), relating to an application for registration of the word sign RHYTHMVIEW as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed.

| 2. | Topera, Inc., shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Topera, Inc., shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 200, 6.6.2016.

1

---
### Section 1: General Information
Please fill out an d submit this form electr onically to WaterSense by Monday, April 1, 2013 . If you have any questions, please refer to the Frequently Asked Questions page or email the WaterSense Helpline. To save a draft of this applic ation, select “Save my progre ss and resume later”. You will be prompted to provide an email address and password that you w ill use to re-enter the form. WaterSense does not have access to these passwords, so please keep your password in a safe place. Please fill in the following information as it relate s to your organization:

Phone * Format (xxx xxx xxxx) Fax Email * 

### Section 2: Eligibility Yes, our organization became a Water Sense partner prior to January 1, 2013. Yes, our organization submitted quarter ly reports for all homes labeled in 2012. 

### Section 3: Organization Description

Section 4: Written Statement If you haven’t done so already, please download, complete, and save your written statement

. Acceptable file formats: Word or PDF. 

### Section 5: Supporting Materials Please note: WaterSense is no longer accepting hard copy sup porting materials. Partners are also asked to limit their electronic supporting materials to 25 pages. Additional supporting materials will not be reviewed.

Upload more supportin g materials Or g anization Name *  Please select... Contact Name (for awards-r elated communications) * Title

Please verif y y our eli g ibilit y : *          

Briefl y describe y our or g anization in no more than 300 words. If selected to receive an award, this description may be used in recognition materials. *

 

 

Please upload y our final written statement, in which y ou have addressed the evaluation criteria. * Browse...

Please upload an y supportin g materials that help demonstrate the accomplishments described in y our written statement. Includin g supportin g materials is not required, but is stron g l y encoura g ed. To upload additional supporting materials, pl ease use the "Upload more supporti ng materials" link below the first record. Browse... Pa g e 1 of 2Please note: Individual files may not exceed 5 MB. To tal file size may not exceed 20 MB. We understand that some high-resolution photos may be quite la rge and push your application over the 20 MB file size limit. Therefore, you may send up to 10 additional ph otos of your 2012 WaterSense-related activities to watersenseawards@erg.com . These photos may be used in recognition materials if your organization is selected for an award. Materials other than photos sent to this ema il address will not be reviewed with your application. Your application form, including the written statement and supporting materials, must be submitted by Monday, April 1, 2013 to be considered for an award. On the following page, you will be asked to review your responses. You must select "confirm" at the bottom of the following page to submit your award application to WaterSense. Please note, you may need to tr y different printer settings or print as a PDF to print the full report for your records. We apologize for any inconvenience.

N eed assistance with this form? Pa g e 2 of 2
TS-CKHI01

Attachment #5

Pt. 2, Sec. A, 2

Worker/Occupational Exposure Informatio n on the New Chemical Substance at

Industrial Sites Controlled by the Submitter
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CertificationPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofAXT, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Philip C. S. Yin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), that, to the best of myknowledge:

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: November 8, 2005 | By:    | /s/ Philip C. S. Yin    |
|------------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                         |   | Philip C. S. Yin        |
|                         |   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
```

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 233 (Monday, December 6, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75662-75663]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-30672]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CHEMICAL SAFETY AND HAZARD INVESTIGATION BOARD

Sunshine Act Meeting

    In connection with its investigation into the April 20, 2010, 
explosion and fire that occurred on the BP/Transocean Deepwater Horizon 
oil rig, the United States Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation 
Board (CSB) announces that it will be holding an all day symposium 
entitled ``International Models of Offshore Oil Rig Regulation'' on 
Wednesday, December 15, 2010 in Washington, DC. The meeting will bring 
together international regulators, union representatives and industry 
groups' to discuss regulation of offshore drilling operations in the 
wake of the Deepwater Horizon accident.
    The meeting will be held from 9 a.m.-5 p.m. at the Embassy Suites 
Ballroom located at 1250 22nd Street Northwest in Washington, DC. The 
meeting is free and open to the public.
    The CSB's Board Members and BP Deepwater Horizon investigation team 
will hear testimony from leading safety experts involved in offshore 
drilling activities from countries including the United Kingdom, 
Australia and Norway. CSB Board Members and panel participants will be 
available to answer questions during a public comment period. The 
meeting will be available via webcast. All proceedings will be 
videotaped and an official transcript will be published.
    The CSB is an independent Federal agency charged with investigating 
industrial chemical accidents. The agency's board members are appointed 
by the president and confirmed by the Senate. CSB investigations look 
into all aspects of chemical accidents, including physical causes such 
as equipment failure as well as inadequacies in

[[Page 75663]]

regulations, industry standards, and safety management systems.

Christopher W. Warner,
General Counsel.
[FR Doc. 2010-30672 Filed 12-2-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6350-01-P
```
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 183-2 Filed 12/04/2006 Page 1 of 1
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1381 

To require a report on the extension of authorities to the United States 

Special Operations Command for the development, acquisition, and 

sustainment of special operations-peculiar technology, equipment, and 

services, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 20, 2017 

Mr. ROUNDS introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Armed Services 

A BILL 

To require a report on the extension of authorities to the 

United States Special Operations Command for the development, acquisition, and sustainment of special operations-peculiar technology, equipment, and services, and 

for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 


rfrederick on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1381 IS

1 SECTION 1. AUTHORITIES FOR THE UNITED STATES SPE2 CIAL OPERATIONS COMMAND FOR DEVELOP3 MENT, ACQUISITION, AND SUSTAINMENT OF 

4 SPECIAL OPERATIONS-PECULIAR TECH5 NOLOGY, EQUIPMENT, AND SERVICES. 

6 (a) SENSE OF CONGRESS.—It is the sense of Con7 gress that— 

8 (1) the Secretary of Defense should extend to 

9 the Commander of the United States Special Oper10 ations Command (USSOCOM) and the acquisition 

11 executive of the Command authorities for the devel12 opment, acquisition, and sustainment of special op13 erations-peculiar technology, equipment, and services 

14 that are equivalent to the authorities of the Secre15 taries of the military departments and the acquisi16 tion executives of the military departments for the 

17 development, acquisition, and sustainment of tech18 nology, equipment, and services for the military de19 partments; and 

20 (2) the United States Special Operations Com21 mand should use any authorities extended as de22 scribed in paragraph (1), and any other appropriate 

23 authorities and mechanisms, to achieve the rapid re24 search and development, prototyping, and fielding of 

25 technology, equipment, and services that are critical 


rfrederick on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1381 IS

1 to ensure the success of the Command in carrying 

2 out its missions. 

3 (b) REPORT.—Not later than 120 days after the date 

4 of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall submit 

5 to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and 

6 the House of Representatives a report setting forth the 

7 following: 

8 (1) An identification of the authorities the Sec9 retary recommends for provision to the Commander 

10 of the United States Special Operations Command 

11 and the acquisition executive of the Command as de12 scribed in subsection (a), and recommendations for 

13 any modifications of such authorities that the Sec14 retary considers appropriate for purposes of the 

15 Command. 

16 (2) Such recommendations for legislative or ad17 ministrative action as the Secretary considers appro18 priate for the provision of authorities identified pur19 suant to paragraph (1) as described in subsection 

20 (a). 

21 (3) Such other matters as the Secretary con22 siders appropriate. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
# C_2017221EN.01002401.xml

| 10.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 221/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 221/24

---

Judgment of the General Court of 16 May 2017 — Marsh v EUIPO (LegalPro)

(Case T-472/16) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Application for the EU word mark LegalPro - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptiveness - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2017/C 221/33)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Marsh GmbH (Frankfurt am Main, Germany) (represented by: W. Riegger, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Fischer, acting as agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 17 June 2016 (Case R 146/2016-4) concerning the application for registration of the word sign ‘LegalPro’ as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Marsh GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Marsh GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 383, 17.10.2016.

1

---
# C_2016383EN.01000201.xml

| 17.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 383/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 383/2

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Novara (Italy) lodged on 4 July 2016 — Bruno Dell’Acqua v Eurocom Srl, Regione Lombardia

(Case C-370/16)

(2016/C 383/02)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunale di Novara

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Bruno Dell’Acqua

Applicant:

Defendants: Eurocom Srl, Regione Lombardia

Defendants:

Question referred

Question referred

‘Is prior authorisation in accordance with the [last] sentence of Article 1 of the “Protocol on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Union” (Official Journal of the European Union C 310/261 of 16.12. 2004) necessary or not, when in attachment proceedings against a third party the sums to be attached are no longer held by the payer, the [European] Commission, but have already been transferred to the national paying agencies?’

---
Exhibit
32.2





Statement
of Chief Financial Officer Furnished


Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





The undersigned, Gary F. Hoskins, is
the Chief Financial Officer of Citizens South Banking Corporation (the
“Company”).





This statement is being furnished in
connection with the filing by the Company of the Company’s Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2009 (the “Report”).





By execution of this statement, I
certify that to the best of my knowledge:





A)
            the
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d))
      and





B)
            the
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
      as of the dates and for the periods covered by the
  Report.





November 12, 2009
            
            /s/ Gary F. HoskinsDated
            
            Gary
      F. HoskinsChief
      Financial Officer





This
statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this
statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.  It is not intended that this
statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.





A signed
original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
to Citizens South Banking Corporation and will be retained
by Citizens South Banking Corporation and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Court of Appeals

Sixth Appellate District of Texas

J U D G M E N T

Tyrone Brown Ramirez, Appellant

No. 06-23-00226-CR v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

Appeal from the 8th District Court of 

Hopkins County, Texas (Tr. Ct. No. 

2229155). Panel consists of Chief Justice 

Stevens and Justices van Cleef and Rambin. 

Memorandum Opinion delivered by Justice 

Rambin. 

As stated in the Court’s opinion of this date, we find there was partial error in the 

judgment of the court below. Therefore, we modify the trial court’s judgment of conviction and 

the clerk’s bill of cost by deleting the $15.00 time payment fee. As modified, we affirm the 

judgment of the trial court.

We note that the appellant, Tyrone Brown Ramirez, has adequately indicated his inability 

to pay costs of appeal. Therefore, we waive payment of costs.

RENDERED JUNE 12, 2024

BY ORDER OF THE COURT

SCOTT E. STEVENS

CHIEF JUSTICE

ATTEST:

Debra K. Autrey, Clerk
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1395 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1395

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To revise the boundaries of certain John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier 
                  Resources System units in Delaware.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPLACEMENT OF JOHN H. CHAFEE COASTAL BARRIER RESOURCES 
              SYSTEM MAP.

    (a) In General.--The map subtitled ``Delaware Seashore Unit DE-07P, 
North Bethany Beach Unit H01'' and dated December 6, 2013, that is 
included in the set of maps entitled ``Coastal Barrier Resources 
System'' referred to in section 4(a) of the Coastal Barrier Resources 
Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(a)) and relating to certain John H. Chafee Coastal 
Barrier Resources System units in the State of Delaware, is replaced by 
the map entitled ``Delaware Seashore Unit DE-07/DE-07P, North Bethany 
Beach Unit H01'' and dated March 18, 2016.
    (b) Availability.--The Secretary of the Interior shall keep the 
replacement map referred to in subsection (a) on file and available for 
inspection in accordance with section 4(b) of the Coastal Barrier 
Resources Act (16 U.S.C. 3503(b)).

            Passed the Senate January 23, 2018.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 1395

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To revise the boundaries of certain John H. Chafee Coastal Barrier 
                  Resources System units in Delaware.
```
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RONALD SPENCER MAZZAFERRO, 

Creditor-Appellant, 

 v. 

WILLIAM PARISI, 

Debtor-Appellee. 

No. 15-15988 

D.C. No. 3:14-cv-01707-JST 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of California

Jon S. Tigar, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted March 8, 2017**

Before: LEAVY, W. FLETCHER, and OWENS, Circuit Judges.

Ronald Spencer Mazzaferro appeals pro se from the district court’s order 

denying his motion for rehearing. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§§ 158(d) and 1291. We review de novo the district court’s decision on appeal 

from the bankruptcy court and apply the same standard of review applied by the 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Accordingly, appellant’s

request for oral argument, set forth in his motion to consolidate, is denied.

FILED

MAR 27 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 15-15988 

district court. In re AFI Holding, Inc., 525 F.3d 700, 702 (9th Cir. 2008). We 

affirm.

The district court denied Mazzafaro’s motion for rehearing of its order 

affirming the bankruptcy court’s order dismissing Mazzaferro’s involuntary 

petition against William Parisi. In his opening brief, Mazzaferro fails to address 

how the district court erred. As a result, he has waived his appeal of the district 

court’s order. See Smith v. Marsh, 194 F.3d 1045, 1052 (9th Cir. 1999) (“[O]n 

appeal, arguments not raised by a party in its opening brief are deemed waived.”); 

Greenwood v. FAA, 28 F.3d 971, 977 (9th Cir. 1994) (“We review only issues 

which are argued specifically and distinctly in the opening brief.”).

We reject as without merit Mazzaferro’s contentions that the bankruptcy 

court and the district court violated due process.

To the extent that Mazzaferro challenges the district court’s order denying 

his motion to unseal, the district court did not err in denying the request because 

Mazzaferro did not seek relief from the bankruptcy court in the first instance but 

presented the request for the first time on appeal to the district court.

To the extent that Mazzaferro seeks an order from this court directing the 

bankruptcy court and district court to unseal judicial records, the request is denied.

All pending motions are denied.

AFFIRMED.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN THE MATTER OF: : MISCELLANEOUS

:

ARA RICHARD AVRIGIAN : NO. 04mc017

ORDER

AND NOW, this 9th day of December, 2004, it appearing that on

September 22, 2003, the respondent was suspended from the practice of law by the Supreme

Court of Pennsylvania for a period of three months, effective thirty days after September 22,

2003, and

it further appearing that after respondent had been given an opportunity to be

heard, that the judges of this court resolved that respondent should be disciplined by this court,

with said discipline to run concurrently with the discipline imposed by the Supreme Court of

Pennsylvania, it is hereby

ORDERED that respondent is suspended from the practice of law by this court 

for a period of three months, effective thirty days after September 22, 2003 

FOR THE COURT:

 

JAMES T. GILES

Chief Judge

Case 2:04-mc-00017-HB Document 8 Filed 12/10/04 Page 1 of 1
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### National Transportation Safety Board

# TIME AND DATE:

9:30 a.m. EDT, December 5, 2023.

# PLACE:

Virtual.

# STATUS:

The one item may be viewed by the public through webcast only.

# MATTER TO BE CONSIDERED:

70966 Marine Investigative Report—Anchor Strike of Underwater Pipeline and Eventual Crude Oil Release, San Pedro Bay near Huntington Beach, California, October 1, 2021.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

                        Candi Bing at (202) 590-8384 or by email at                         *bingc@ntsb.gov.*

*Media Information Contact:*                         Jennifer Gabris by email at                         *jennifer.gabris@ntsb.gov*                         or at (202) 314-6100.                    

                        This meeting will take place virtually. The public may view it through a live or archived webcast by accessing a link under “Upcoming Events” on the NTSB home page at                         *www.ntsb.gov.*

                        Schedule updates, including weather-related cancellations, are also available at                         *www.ntsb.gov.*

The National Transportation Safety Board is holding this meeting under the Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552(b).

Dated: November 9, 2023.

LaSean R. McCray,

Assistant Federal Register Liaison Officer.

[FR Doc. 2023-25173 Filed 11-9-23; 11:15 am]

BILLING CODE 7533-01-P