alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 96 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 96

 Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on the Budget in 
                  the One Hundred Fifteenth Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 7, 2017

 Mrs. Black submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                 the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on the Budget in 
                  the One Hundred Fifteenth Congress.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

    For the expenses of the Committee on the Budget (hereafter in this 
resolution referred to as the ``Committee''), including the expenses of 
all staff salaries, there shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts 
of the House of Representatives for committee salaries and expenses, 
not more than $10,380,424 for the One Hundred Fifteenth Congress.

SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

    Of the amount specified in section 1--
            (1) not more than $5,190,212 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2017, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2018; and
            (2) not more than $5,190,212 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2018, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2019.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

    Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized 
by the Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Committee, and approved 
in the manner directed by the Committee on House Administration.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

    Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House 
Administration.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2016475EN.01002501.xml

| 19.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 475/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 475/25

---

Order of the General Court of 25 October 2016 — Czech Republic v Commission

(Case T-32/16) (1)

1

(2016/C 475/37)

Language of the case: Czech

The President of the Seventh Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 98, 14.3.2016.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT AUGUST 1, 1998 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS AND CASH FLOWS, EACH FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED AUGUST 1, 1998, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                AUG-1-1998
<CASH>                                              12
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       22
<ALLOWANCES>                                         5
<INVENTORY>                                        235
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   329
<PP&E>                                             182
<DEPRECIATION>                                      65
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     463
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              217
<BONDS>                                            220
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                        (18)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       463
<SALES>                                            338
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   342
<CGS>                                              198
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      198
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   165
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     3
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  14
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (35)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (14)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (21)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (21)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
|  | U.S. Department of		Labor			Office of Administrative Law Judges |  |
|--|-----------------------------------------------------------------|--|
|  |

|  | www.oalj.dol.gov |  |
|--|------------------|--|
No. 62997.

#### Traveler Trading Co. *v.*United States,

protest 58/3929 (New York).

*362Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance witb stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of artificial flowers the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 61346, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

TROY D. POSEY,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 591 MAL 2016

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 17th day of January, 2017, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED.
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 152 Filed 10/05/2006 Page 1 of 10
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 152 Filed 10/05/2006 Page 2 of 10
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 152 Filed 10/05/2006 Page 3 of 10
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 152 Filed 10/05/2006 Page 4 of 10
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 152 Filed 10/05/2006 Page 5 of 10
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 152 Filed 10/05/2006 Page 6 of 10
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 152 Filed 10/05/2006 Page 7 of 10
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 152 Filed 10/05/2006 Page 8 of 10
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 152 Filed 10/05/2006 Page 9 of 10
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 152 Filed 10/05/2006 Page 10 of 10
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of TenFold Corporation
(the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Nancy M. Harvey, President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                               
|---------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                               
|/s/ Nancy M. Harvey                                            
|Nancy M. Harvey                                                
|President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer
|May 11, 2005
No. 57627.

#### J. J. Boll and Grossman Elec. & Radio Co. *v.*United States,

protests 186917-K and 177721-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of 54-watt, K-watt, or 1-watt carbon resistors, composed in chief value of metal, used chiefly as parts of radio apparatus, instruments, or devices, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
# C_2015138EN.01006101.xml

| 27.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/61 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/61

---

Action brought on 26 February 2015 — Red Bull v OHIM — Optimum Mark (Representation of the colours blue and silver)

(Case T-101/15)

(2015/C 138/79)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Red Bull GmbH (Fuschl am See, Austria) (represented by: A. Renck, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Optimum Mark (Warsaw, Poland)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: Representation of the colours blue and silver — Community trade mark registration No 2 5 34  774

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

Procedure before OHIM:

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 2 December 2014 in Case R 2037/2013-1

Contested decision:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the contested decision;

| — | Order OHIM and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, should it intervene, to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, should it intervene, to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Articles 4, 7(1)(a) and 52(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Articles 4, 7(1)(a) and 52(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of the principle of legitimate expectations established by the Court of Justice under Community law. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of the principle of legitimate expectations established by the Court of Justice under Community law.

---
No. 62489.

#### International Expediters, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 324632-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Duke Capital LLC (Duke Capital) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Keith G. Butler, Chief Financial Officer and Controller of Duke Capital, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Duke Capital.



|                                      
|--------------------------------------
|                                      
|/s/ KEITH G. BUTLER                   
|Keith G. Butler                       
|Chief Financial Officer and Controller
|May 16, 2005
Electronically FiledIntermediate Court of Appeals2960231-JAN-201109:51 AM
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

: CIVIL ACTION NOS.

:

WILSON : 02-3878

RETES : 02-3888

LUX, et al. : 02-3904

JACKSON, et al. : 02-3921

GUZZETTA, et al. : 02-3960

FAGAN, et al. : 02-3965

GREEN : 02-3989

NELSON, et al. : 02-4120

ASHTON, et al. : 02-4155

MCNALLY, et al : 02-4159

EVERETT, et al. : 02-4191

CASTELAZ, et al. : 02-4192

PERRY : 02-4249

NAPIER, et al. : 02-4256

POWERS, et al. : 02-4260

SANTOS, et al. : 02-4272

PRICE : 02-4299

SHULDA : 02-4307

:

VS. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION, et al. :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of July, 2002, the Court having been previously

advised that the above action cannot proceed to trial and disposition because of the following

reason:

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending disposition of a related

action.

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending determination of

arbitration proceedings.

[ ] - Interlocutory appeal filed.

Case 2:02-cv-04299-HH Document 2 Filed 07/10/2002 Page 1 of 2
[ X ] - Other: Case is placed into suspense pending receipt of the Case

Transfer Order from the Judicial Panel on Multi District Litigation

transferring case to District of Minnesota.

It is

ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this action closed for statistical purposes and

place the matter in the Civil Suspense File, and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction; and that the case be

restored to the trial docket when the action is in a status so that it may proceed to final

disposition; this order shall not prejudice the rights of the parties to this litigation.

BY THE COURT:

________________________________________

Herbert J. Hutton, Judge

Case 2:02-cv-04299-HH Document 2 Filed 07/10/2002 Page 2 of 2
No. 65430.

#### Guy B. Barham Co. and C. J. Hendry Company et al. *v.*United States,

protests 313620-K, etc. (Los Angeles).

*417Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of fish netting similar in all material respects to that involved in Abstract 63947, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
##### 



EXHIBIT 99 (a)

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of Northland Cable Television,
Inc. and Subsidiary (the Company) on Form 10Q/A for the period ended March
31, 2001 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Form 10-Q/A), I, John Whetzell, Chief Executive Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;



| | (1) |  | The Form 10-Q/A fully complies with the requirements of Section
13 (a) or (15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
78m or 78(d)); and   
| | --- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Form 10-Q/A fairly presents in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

Dated: November 8, 2002

| |  |     |  |                                         
| |  | --- |  | ----------------------------------------
| |  | BY: |  | /s/ JOHN S. WHETZELL                    
| |  |     |  |                                         
| |  |     |  | John S. Whetzell
Chief Executive Officer
Before the Third Division,

May 8, 1962

No. 66747.

#### Richard L. Feigen & Co. *v.*United States,

protest 60/2447-11146 (Chicago).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the “Miro sketch” is an original drawing, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Pace:

IPAC Operational Metrics for July 2019

Volume by Transaction Type

Dollar Amount] % of Total Dollar Amou ‘Number of Transactions] _% of Total Number of Transactions|

Fiduciary (Investment & Borrowing) 8,056,067,606,254] 33.50% 14,556 11.34%]
Buy/Sell 33,313,189, 155| 0.41% 112,518 57.64%6|
Benefits (RITS) 6,647,05,673| 0.08% 435 0.3856
[Check Aftermath (TRACS) 140,333,224] 0.00% 223) 0.64%6|
Zero Dollar | 0.0055 ) 0.00%6|
[Grand Total - July 2019 8,096, 168,183, 406| 100.00%| 128,382] 100.005

Grand Total - June 2019

8,643,168, 234, 284|

[hune to July Change

Percentage Change

|Grand Total - July 2018

[July 2018 to July 2019 Change

Percentage Change

100.00%6}
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6957
CHARLES B. YOUNG, Petitioner - Appellant, versus COLIE L. RUSHTON, McCI; HENRY MCMASTER, Attorney General for South Carolina, Respondents - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Beaufort. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (9:06-cv-00369-GRA) Submitted: January 17, 2008 Decided: January 23, 2008 Before TRAXLER, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Charles B. Young, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, SOUTH CAROLINA ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Charles Young seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion for reconsideration of the dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Young has not made the requisite showing. Young’s appeal is essentially duplicative of his appeal in No. 06-8049, in which we considered the district court’s denial of Young’s motion for reconsideration. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately- 3 - presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON , D
. C
. 2 0460 

### O

l.' : 2 2009

Ms. Rebecca Morley National Center for Healthy Housing 10320 Little Patuxent Parkway, Ste. 500 Columbia, MD 21044 Mr. Patrick MacRoy Alliance for Healthy Homes 50 F St., NW, Ste . 300 Washington, DC 20001 

### Mr. Tom Neltner Sierra Club 408 C St. , NE Washington, DC 20002 Dear Ms. Morley , Mr. MacRoy, and Mr. Neltner: O F F I CE O F PREV E NTI ON , P E STICIDES A ND TOX I C SUBSTA N CES

On August 10 , 2009, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA or Agency) received your petition requesting that EPA take action to lower EPA's regula tory lead hazard standard for lead in dust and modify EPA's regulatory definition of lead-based paint. Your petition requested reliefunder Section 21 ofTSCA 1 or, if appropriate, under Section 553(e) 2 ofthe Administrative Procedures Act (APA). Lead poisoning prevention is a priority for EPA. More recent epidemiological studies indicate that the current hazard standards may not be sufficiently protective. The Agency believes that its efforts should be based on current science. Thus , after careful consideration , EPA has decided to grant your request and intends to begin an appropriate proceeding. Although EPA has granted your request, the Agency is not committing to a specific rulemaking outcome - including the specific level of the lead
- dust hazard standard
- or to a certain date for promulgation of a final rule. EPA is granting thi s request under section 553( e) ofthe Administrati ve Procedures Act (APA) after concluding that proceeding under Title IV ofthe Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) is more appropriate and that the request i s outs ide the scope of Section 21 ofTSCA. Additionally, becau s e the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has the statutory authority to establish a lower level of lead in paint for purposes ofthe definition of lead
-based paint in target housing, EPA will work with HUD on this asp ect of your reque st.

1 1 5 U .S .C. § 2 62 0 1 5 U .S.C. § 553 (e)
l n terne t .Address ( U R L) • http :// www.e pa . go v R ecycl e d/Recyclable • P ri n te d with Vege table 0 1 1Based In k s o n 1 00 % Postconsu me r . Process Ch l orin e Fre e Recycl ed Pa pe rShould HUD make revisions to the definition of lead-based paint in target housing, EPA intends to coordinate accordingly. It is, nonetheless , EPA ' s intention to initiate appropriate proceedings regarding the definition of lead-based paint in non-target housing . Thank you for your continued interest in the Agency's efforts to reduce lead exposures. If you have any questions relating to your petition, please contact Jacqueline Mosby ofmy staff at (202) 566-2228.



# · x:. Owens t Administrator
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 22

- 00040

- CR

B ENJAMIN A NDREW C OLE

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 432nd District

Court

of Tarrant County ( 1583879D )

November 3, 2022

Memorandum Opinion by Justice

Bassel

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the t rial c ourt’s judgment s . It is ordered that the judgment s of the

trial court are affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Dabney Bassel

Justice Dabney Bassel
<PAGE>

                             TUSCANY MINERALS, LTD.

Geoffrey  N.  Goodall                               December  8,  2001
1315  Arborrlynn  Drive                                      Delivered
North  Vancouver,  B.C.  V7J  2V6

Dear  Mr.  Goodall;

     Re:  Tuscany  Minerals,  Ltd.  ("Tuscany")-Option
     Agreement  dated  December  8,  2000  between  Tuscany  and
     Geoffrey  N.  Goodall  ("Goodall")(the  "Option
     Agreement")

This letter confirms that in consideration of the payment of CDN $ 1,000 paid by
Tuscany  to  Goodall,  Tuscany and Goodall have agreed to amend the terms of the
Option  Agreement  by  deleting section 4(a)(ii) (A) and replacing it with; "(A)
$10,000  US  on  or  before  June  8,  2002;"  Except  as amended in this letter
agreement, the balance of the terms of the Option Agreement shall remain in full
force  and  effect.

Goodall has represented to Tuscany that he will undertake such activities as may
be  necessary to file such assessment work to keep all the claims comprising the
property covered by the Option Agreement in good standing for a further one year
period.

Please  indicate  your  acceptance  by  executing  in  the  space set out below.

Yours  truly,
Tuscany  Minerals,  Ltd.
Per:

/s/  Stephen  Barley,  President
-----------------------------------
Stephen  Barley

The  above  is  agreed  as  of  the  date  first  above  written.

/s/  Geoffrey  N.  Goodall
----------------------------
Geoffrey  N.  Goodall

                2060 GISBY STREET * WEST VANCOUVER, BC * V7V 4N5
                  PHONE:  (604) 926-4300 - FAX:  (604) 926-6400
                              E-MAIL/SBPLC@HOME.COM