alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
     This schedule contains summary financial information from the financial 
statements of Solucorp Industries Ltd for the quarterly period ended March 31, 
1999 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                             1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-mos
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                                   0
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      3006208
<ALLOWANCES>                                        109438
<INVENTORY>                                        2083560
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   7800595
<PP&E>                                              249369
<DEPRECIATION>                                       69516
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     8313788
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              3803248
<BONDS>                                                  0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                          21215991
<OTHER-SE>                                               0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       8313788
<SALES>                                            1138135
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   1638135
<CGS>                                               564124
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      1579883
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                         0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   25998
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                      92523
<INCOME-TAX>                                             0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                      0
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                          0
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                         92523
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         .003
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0
        


</TABLE>
# C_2017078EN.01000603.xml

| 13.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 78/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 78/6

---

Appeal brought on 12 July 2016 by BSH Hausgeräte GmbH, anciennement BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH against the judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) delivered on 12 May 2016 in Case T-749/14: Chung-Yuan Chang v EUIPO — BSH Hausgeräte (AROMA)

(Case C-389/16 P)

(2017/C 078/09)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: BSH Hausgeräte GmbH, anciennement BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH (represented by: S. Biagosch, Rechtsanwalt)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), Peter Chung-Yuan Chang

Other parties to the proceedings:

By order of 15 November 2016 the Court of Justice (Seventh Chamber) held that the appeal was inadmissible.

---
Case No. 9,687.

#### MOCKBEE et al. v. UPPERMAN et al.

[5 Cranch, C. C. 535.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

March Term, 1839.

Taxation — Tax Title — Infant’s Land —Right to Redeem.

Infants whose property has been sold for taxes due to the corporation of Washington, have a right to redeem at any time within one year after they have arrived at full age.

Bill in equity by [Eliza Ellen Mockbee and others against Anna Maria Upperman and the heirs of Benjamin B. Myers] to redeem property in Washington sold for taxes, and to cancel the deed made by the corporation of Washington to the purchaser at the tax-sale; or to obtain a reconveyance of the property to the infants. The complainants were the mother and two infant children; who claimed the south half of lot No. 9, in the square No. 293, in Washington, under a deed from James N. Edmonston to the mother in trust for the two children during their joint lives and the life of the survivor of them, with remainder to the mother in fee. The property was assessed in the name of Sarah Edmonston and Benjamin B. Myers; and more than two years’ taxes being due thereon, it was advertised as their property and sold in June, 1832, by the collector to the said Benjamin B. Myers, who paid the amount of the taxes due thereon, namely, *559($17.78,) but died without obtaining a deed from the mayor of Washington, according to the provisions of the charter; who on the ‘8th of July, 1834, made a deed to “the heirs of Benjamin B. Myers, deceased,” without naming them. By the tenth section of the charter of 1820, it is provided, “that minors, mortgagees, or others having equitable interests in real property, which property shall be sold for taxes as aforesaid, shall be allowed one year after such minors coming to, or being of, full age, or after such mortgagees, and others having equitable interests, obtaining the possession of, or a decree for the sale of, such property, to redeem the property, so sold, from the purchaser or purchasers, his, her, or their assigns, on paying the amount of purchase-money so paid therefor, with ten per cent, interest thereon as aforesaid, and all the taxes that have been paid thereon by the purchaser or his assigns, between the day of sale and the period of such redemption, with ten per cent, interest on the amount of such taxes, and also the full value of the improvements which may have been made or erected on such property by the purchaser or his assigns, while the same was in his or their possession.”

One of the children had arrived at full age when the bill was filed, but the year had not elapsed which was allowed for redemption. The other child was still under age.

1

 [Reported by Hon. William Cranch, Chief Judge.]

THE COURT was of opinion that they were in time to redeem, and decreed accordingly.
### . 

## , 

## AMERICAN 

## LUNG ASSOCIATIONe IN GREATER CHICAGO 

### Carbon Pollution Standards Testimony ofAmy Ochalski Healthy Air Campaign Manager, American Lung Association in Illinois May 24,2012 Chicago, Illinois Good evening, my name is Amy Ochalski and I'm the Healthy Air Campaign Manager for the American Lung Association in Illinois. I help raise awareness about the importance ofclean air for healthy communities and also about how policies created in Washington DC have a direct impact on the quality ofourair. To date, 15 Illinois public health organizations have signed on to our campaign in support for stronger air pollution standards. Our partners range in size and scope, from small county health departments to chapters of national health advocacy organizations. However, they share a common goal of improving public health and realize that clean air is fundamental to achieving this goal. On behalfofthe American Lung Association in Illinois' Healthy Air Campaign, I want to express support forthe proposed Carbon Pollution Standard for New Power Plants. I spend a lot oftime talking at health fairs and community meetings about how public policy affects the quality ofthe air we breathe in Illinois. I explain the intricacies of how EPA makes rules, and how these rules are sometimes weakened or delayed oreven eliminated altogether. There are a few things I've learned as a result.The first is that people get pretty bored when you talk to them about public policy. The second is that people really do count on you and your colleagues to look out for their best interests.They count on you to make sure the air is as clean as it can possibly be. In 2010 alone, the Clean AirAct prevented 160,000 premature deaths; 1 .7 million instances of asthma exacerbation; 41,000 respiratory hospital admissions; and 45,000 cardiovascular hospital admissions. New and improved regulations are expected to save even more.

# .

# · -. Cleaner air will improve the lives of many people in Illinois and throughoutthe country. Please make new power plants as clean as they can possibly be by creating the strongest possible rules for carbon pollution. Thank you . Contact information: Amy Ochalski Amy.ochalski@lungil.org P: 312-445-2525
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA SUPREME COURT CASE NO. DA

- 23

- 0166
HOLLY HAPPE, individually and as ) Personal Representative of the Estate of ) MARJORIE LEE LAVALLEY, ) ) **ORDER ALLOWING** Plaintiff/Appellant, ) **EXTENSION OF TIME** ) **TO FILE OPENING BRIEF**

- vs. - ) ) COURTNEY LAWELLIN, Attorney at ) Law and COURTNEY LAWELLIN, P.C. ) a registered Montana Professional ) Corporation, ) ) Defendants/Appellees, ) ) ____________________________________) Upon motion of the Appellant, no objection by the Appellee and good cause appearing therefore IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Appellant shall have up through and including July 26, 2023 in which to file her opening brie f he rein.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

June 27 2023

06/27/2023

Case Number: DA 23-0166
**EXHIBIT      32.2 **

**CERTIFICATE      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | 1. | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d),                as                applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                and |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                Company                at the dates and for the period                indicated. |
|--------|----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                 |                                   |                                                                                                |
|--------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                            |                              |                                                                                           |
| Dated:                April 11, 2006 | By:                          | /s/ Steven                R. Blake           |
|                                 | Steven R. Blake                        |
|                                 | Chief                Financial Officer |

----
No. 64781.

#### Radio Corporation of America *v.*United States,

protests 58/8621 and 58/13011 (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of recording tapes similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Electric & Musical Industries (US), Ltd.*v. *United States*(42 Cust. Ct. 87, C.D. 2070), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# C_2017144EN.01003901.xml

| 8.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 144/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 144/39

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 March 2017 — Wessel-Werk v EUIPO — Wolf PVG (Suction nozzles for vacuum cleaners)

(Case T-174/16) (1)

1

((Community design - Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity - Registered Community design representing a suction nozzle for a vacuum cleaner - Earlier Community design - Ground for invalidity - Individual character - Informed user - Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002))

(2017/C 144/51)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Wessel-Werk GmbH (Reichshof, Germany) (represented by: C. Becker, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Schifko, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Wolf PVG GmbH & Co. KG (Vlotho, Germany) (represented by: J. Künzel, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 February 2016 (Case R 1652/2014-3), as rectified, relating to proceedings for a declaration of invalidity between Wolf PVG and Wessel-Werk.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Wessel-Werk GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Wessel-Werk GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 211, 13.6.2016.

1

---
No. 55152.

#### Indo Persian Fine Art Co. *v.*United States,

protest 132226-K (New York).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The protest was dismissed.
|On-line Bookcover to Fauna 1Fauna Series No. 1Cover
      Contents
      Foreword
      Approach
      Methods
      Analysis
      Conspectus
      Suggested Policy | Fauna of the National Parksof the United States
       CONTENTS

Foreword

Approach to wild-life administration

Methods adapted to faunal investigations in national parks

Analysis of major types of faunal problems  their causes and treatment
      Basic causes of present faunal maladjustments
      Problems of historical origin
      Problems of geographical origin
      Problems of competitive origin

Conspectus of wild-life problems of each park
      Southwest parks
      Rocky Mountain parks
      Pacific Coast parks
      Eastern park
      Territorial parks

Suggested national-park policy for the vertebrates
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Top                                                                                                                                                                          | History |
              Links to the Past |
              National Park Service |
              Search |
              ContactLast Modified: Tues, Feb 1 2000 07:08:48 pm PDT
        http://www.cr.nps.gov/history/online_books/fauna1/faunat.htm                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                               
|History |
              Links to the Past |
              National Park Service |
              Search |
              Contact
Exhibit 32.1

    Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
                  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of GSV, Inc. (the  "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period ending  September 30, 2004 (the  "Report"),  I, Gilad Gat,
Chief  Executive  Officer and Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)   The Report fully  complies with the  requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.

Date:    November 15, 2004              By: /s/ Gilad Gat
                                            -------------
                                            Gilad Gat
                                            Chief Executive Officer
                                            Chief Financial Officer
# Aug

# image1.jpg
No. 54571.

protests 151634-K, etc. (New York).

#### Calco Chemical Division—American Cyanamid Company et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In view of the agreed statement of facts establishing that it was necessary to split the drums open by means of a pneumatic hammer or similar tool in order to remove their contents, and that the drums were incapable of further use as containers, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained. *Wm. A. Foster & Co.*v. *United States*(68 Treas. Dec. 384, T. D. 47922) followed.
No. 66273.

#### Hambro Glassware et al. *v.*United States,

protests 249812-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, O. J.

The protests were dismissed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

NATIVIDAD and CANDIDO MONTANEZ :

: CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-CV-4254

Plaintiffs, :

:

v. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION;

BAYER AG;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE;

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM

:

:

:

:

:

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

:

Defendants. :

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of the Court:

Kindly enter the appearances of Hope S. Freiwald, Aline Fairweather, Erin

Brennan and Kirstin J. Miller as attorneys for defendant SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a

GlaxoSmithKline.

Respectfully Submitted,

_____________________________ _____________________________

Hope S. Freiwald Aline Fairweather

_____________________________ _____________________________

Erin Brennan Kirstin J. Miller

DECHERT PRICE & RHOADS

4000 Bell Atlantic Tower

1717 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2793

(215) 994-4000

Case 2:02-cv-04254-CRW Document 7 Filed 10/02/2002 Page 1 of 1
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FE BRUARY 21, 2013

NO. 03

- 12

- 00849

- CR

Albert Joseph Lizotte, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON AND ROSE

DISMISSED ON APPELLANT’S MOTION

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE PEMBERTON

THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the written motion of the appellant to dismiss the appeal

and the same being considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that th e same should be

granted: it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED and DECREED by the Court that the appellant be

allowed to withdraw his notice of appeal and that the appeal be dismissed; and it appearing that

the appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, that no ad judication as to costs be made; and

that this decision be certified below for observance.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision **

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

RGS: Research

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DAVID WAYNE WILSON,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

SCOTT KERNAN, Director Adult

Institutions; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 08-15396

D.C. No. CV-07-00616-GEB/EFB

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Garland E. Burrell, Jr., District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 16, 2010** 

Before: FERNANDEZ, GOULD, and M. SMITH, Circuit Judges.

David Wayne Wilson, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the

district court’s judgment dismissing with prejudice his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action

FILED

MAR 05 2010

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
RGS: Research 2 08-15396

claiming violations of his due process rights. We have jurisdiction under 28

U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo the district court’s dismissal of a complaint for

failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, Resnick v. Hayes, 213 F.3d 443,

447 (9th Cir. 2000), and we affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Wilson’s complaint because he failed

to allege the violation of any right arising under the United States Constitution or

federal law, as required for a Section 1983 claim. See Sandin v. Conner, 515 U.S.

472, 483 (1995). As to Wilson’s substantive due process claim, placement in

administrative segregation does not impose the type of “atypical or significant

hardship on the inmate in relation to the incidents of prison life” to give rise to a

protected liberty interest. Id. at 483-84; see also May v. Baldwin, 109 F.3d 557,

565 (9th Cir. 1997). Nor does Wilson allege facts in support of a procedural due

process claim, which would require lack of notice and opportunity for hearing

preceding the deprivation of life, liberty, or property. See Lone Star Sec. & Video,

Inc. v. City of Los Angeles, 584 F.3d 1232, 1236 (9th Cir. 2009). Wilson failed to

allege a protected interest, and admits that he both received advance notice of the

temporary directive at issue and exercised the opportunity to challenge it.

AFFIRMED.