alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 17, 2021

No. 04-21-00430-CV

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION and James M. Bass,

Appellants

v.

ROBERT DIXON TIPS PROPERTIES, LLC,

Appellee

From the 285th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CI10003

Honorable Tina Torres, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellants’ brief was originally due November 8, 2021. On November 5, 2021, 

appellants filed a “First Motion for an Extension of Time to File Appellants’ Brief,” which 

requested an extension of appellants’ briefing deadline until December 8, 2021. On November 9, 

2021, appellants filed an “Amended First Motion for an Extension of Time to File Appellants’ 

Brief.” The two motions differ only in their certificates of conference; like the original motion, 

the only relief requested in the amended motion was an extension of appellants’ briefing deadline 

until December 8, 2021. 

 By order issued November 9, 2021, this court granted appellants’ “First Motion for an 

Extension of Time to File Appellants’ Brief” and extended appellants’ briefing deadline until 

December 8, 2021. Accordingly, appellants’ “Amended First Motion for an Extension of Time to 

File Appellants’ Brief” is DENIED AS MOOT.

_________________________________

Beth Watkins, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 17th day of November, 2021.
___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM (A) THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 1998 (UNAUDITED) AND THE CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1998 (UNAUDITED)
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                                 0
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                                       0
<CASH>                                         249,994
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                               0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               5,064,696
<POLICY-LOSSES>                                      0
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                                0
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        12,000
<OTHER-SE>                                   (210,986)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 5,064,696
<PREMIUMS>                                           0
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                                  0
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                                   0
<OTHER-INCOME>                                       0
<BENEFITS>                                           0
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                          0
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                         (448,986)
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (448,986)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (448,986)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (448,986)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
No. 66255.

#### Gill & Duffus, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 265766-K (Laredo).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *The Best Foods, Inc.*(47 C.C.P.A. 163, C.A.D. 751), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Document

Exhibit 10.6


Non-Employee Director Compensation


We currently pay our non-employee directors the following:


•annual retainer of $93,500 for the Lead Director  
•annual retainer of $97,000 for the Chairperson of the Audit Committee
•annual retainer of $87,500 for the Chairperson of the Compensation Committee
•annual retainer of $85,000 for the Chairperson of the Nominating and Governance Committee


The equity component of the director's compensation is valued at $170,000.  The annual equity package consists of 50% in stock options and 50% in restricted stock units.   The options become exercisable one year after the grant date and expire ten years after the grant date.  The restricted stock units vest one year from the grant date.
No. 57195.

protests 977286-G, etc. (New York).

#### B. S. Bernstein, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the kidskin plates are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Kung Chen Fur Corpn.*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Ford, J., concurred.

Mollison, J., dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1480, *supra.*
# C_2017283EN.01004602.xml

| 28.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 283/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 283/46

---

Judgment of the General Court of 18 July 2017 — Commission v RN

(Case T-695/16) (1)

1

((Appeal - Civil Service - Officials - Surviving spouse - Pensions - Survivor’s pension - Article 20 of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations - Conditions for eligibility - Error of law))

(2017/C 283/71)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: European Commission (represented by: A.-C. Simon, F. Simonetti and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: RN (represented by: F. Moyse, lawyer) and European Parliament (represented by: M. Ecker and E. Taneva, acting as Agents)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 20 July 2016, RN v Commission (F-104/15, EU:F:2016:163) seeking to have that judgment set aside.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets aside the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 20 July 2016, RN v Commission (F-104/15; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets aside the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 20 July 2016, RN v Commission (F-104/15;

| 2. | Refers the case back to a Chamber of the General Court other than that which has ruled on the present appeal; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Refers the case back to a Chamber of the General Court other than that which has ruled on the present appeal;

| 3. | Reserves the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Reserves the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 441, 28.11.2016.

1

---
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**Certification Pursuant to**

**18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

**As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AXT, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Wilson W. Cheung, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), that, to the best of myknowledge:

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated:  August 10, 2009 | By:    | /s/ WILSON W. CHEUNG                                                                                        |
|------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                         |   | Wilson W. Cheung*Chief Financial Officer  (Principal Financial Officer and**Principal  Accounting Officer)* |

 

----
Exhibit 32
 Certification pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
  1.
    
    the report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934; and
 2.
    
    the information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
  Date:  August 8, 2011
    /s/ John R. KoelmelJohn R. KoelmelPresident and Chief Executive OfficerDate:  August 8, 2011
    /s/ Gregory W. NorwoodGregory W. NorwoodChief Financial Officer
# C_2017038EN.01001502.xml

| 6.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/15

---

Action brought on 29 November 2016 — European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany

(Case C-620/16)

(2017/C 038/20)

Language of the case: Germany

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: W. Mölls, L. Havas and J. Hottiaux, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Federal Republic of Germany

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare that the Federal Republic of Germany infringed Council Decision 2014/699/EU (1) and Article 4(3) TEU, in so far as, at the 25th meeting of the OTIF Revision Committee, it voted against the common position laid down in that decision and expressed open opposition both to that common position and to the exercise of voting rights by the EU provided for therein. |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that the Federal Republic of Germany infringed Council Decision 2014/699/EU (1) and Article 4(3) TEU, in so far as, at the 25th meeting of the OTIF Revision Committee, it voted against the common position laid down in that decision and expressed open opposition both to that common position and to the exercise of voting rights by the EU provided for therein.

1

| — | order the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on the following pleas in law:

The Intergovernmental Organisation for International Carriage by Rail (OTIF), of which the EU alongside 26 Member States is a member, administers the Convention concerning International Carriage by Rail (COTIF).

At the 25th meeting of the OTIF Revision Committee a vote was held with respect to certain changes to the convention and its annexes. The Council laid down the EU common position with regard to several of those points in Decision 2014/699/EU.

At the meeting, the Federal Republic of Germany voted in two points against the common position laid down in that decision, expressed open opposition to that common position and in one case also to exercise of voting rights by the EU provided for in the decision.

That conduct is incompatible with Decision 2014/699/EU and with Article 4(3) TEU.

---

(1)  Council Decision 2014/699/EU of 24 June 2014 establishing the position to be adopted on behalf of the European Union at the 25th session of the OTIF Revision Committee as regards certain amendments to the Convention concerning International Carriage by Rail (COTIF) and to the Appendices thereto (OJ L 293, p. 26).

1

---
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 99-59

                          MONTHLY SERVICER CERTIFICATE

Pursuant to Section 4.01(d)(ii) of the Securitization Property Servicing
Agreement, dated as of March 9, 2001 (the "Agreement"), between The Detroit
Edison Company, as servicer (the "Servicer") and The Detroit Edison
Securitization Funding LLC, the Servicer does hereby certify as follows:

Capitalized terms used herein have their respective meanings as set forth in the
Agreement.

For the Monthly Period:  October 2004
                         ------------

1.     BILLINGS:

a)    Monthly kWh Consumption:    4,151,807,298
                                  -------------
b)    Applicable SB Charge:           $ 0.00374
                                      ---------
c)    Total SB Charge Amount Invoiced this Month
      (Net of .5% uncollectible factor):                        $ 15,443,395.86
                                                                ---------------
d)    Cumulative SB Charge Amount Invoiced this
      Remittance Period:                                       $ 154,723,192.39
                                                               ----------------

2.     REMITTANCES:

a)    Weighted Average Days outstanding:                                51
                                                                        --
b)    Total Amount Remitted this Month:                    $ 14,801,896.10
                                                           ---------------
c)    Cumulative Amount Remitted this Remittance Period:   $145,894,013.98
                                                           ---------------

3.     BALANCES ON SUBACCOUNTS (AT END OF MONTHLY PERIOD):

e)    Collection Account Balance:                 $ 31,294,867.51
                                                  ---------------
f)    Reserve Subaccount Balance:                        $ 587.47
                                                        ---------
g)    Series Overcollateralization Subaccount Balance:    $198.12
                                                          -------
h)    Series Capital Subaccount Balance:           $ 7,398,628.56
                                                   --------------

Executed as of November 12, 2004.

                                    THE DETROIT EDISON COMPANY
                                    as Servicer

                                    By:   /s/  Peter B. Oleksiak
                                        -----------------------------------
                                    Name:  Peter B. Oleksiak
                                    Title:  Director and Assistant Controller
# C_2017078EN.01000801.xml

| 13.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 78/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 78/8

---

Appeal brought on 15 September 2016 by TeamBank AG Nürnberg against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 20 July 2016 in Case T-745/14: TeamBank v EUIPO — Easy Asset Management (EASY CREDIT)

(Case C-495/16 P)

(2017/C 078/11)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: TeamBank AG Nürnberg (represented by: D. Terheggen, Rechtsanwalt)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), Easy Asset Management AD

Other parties to the proceedings:

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1423 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1423

  To require the Secretary of Transportation to modify the final rule 
relating to flightcrew member duty and rest requirements for passenger 
  operations of air carriers to apply to all-cargo operations of air 
                   carriers, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 22, 2017

 Ms. Klobuchar (for herself, Ms. Cantwell, Mr. Blumenthal, Mr. Markey, 
 Mr. Franken, and Ms. Duckworth) introduced the following bill; which 
was read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and 
                             Transportation

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require the Secretary of Transportation to modify the final rule 
relating to flightcrew member duty and rest requirements for passenger 
  operations of air carriers to apply to all-cargo operations of air 
                   carriers, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Safe Skies Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. MODIFICATION OF FINAL RULE RELATING TO FLIGHTCREW MEMBER DUTY 
              AND REST REQUIREMENTS FOR PASSENGER OPERATIONS TO APPLY 
              TO ALL-CARGO OPERATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Not later than 30 days after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Transportation shall modify the 
final rule specified in subsection (b) so that the flightcrew member 
duty and rest requirements under that rule apply to flightcrew members 
in all-cargo operations conducted by air carriers in the same manner as 
those requirements apply to flightcrew members in passenger operations 
conducted by air carriers.
    (b) Final Rule Specified.--The final rule specified in this 
subsection is the final rule of the Federal Aviation Administration--
            (1) published in the Federal Register on January 4, 2012 
        (77 Fed. Reg. 330); and
            (2) relating to flightcrew member duty and rest 
        requirements.
    (c) Applicability of Rulemaking Requirements.--The requirements of 
section 553 of title 5, United States Code, shall not apply to the 
modification required by subsection (a).
                                 <all>
```
4

a) Counsel are expected to select a jury promptly without arguing the case to the

panel.

b) In general, the court discourages side bar conferences because they are usually

unnecessary. If counsel feel that a side bar is absolutely necessary, they shall

state the side bar general purpose so that the court may decide whether one is

in fact necessary.

c) It is not necessary to ask permission to approach a witness.

d) Counsel are expected to have their witnesses available, either in the courtroom

or in the witness room located outside the courtroom. Please instruct your

witnesses to speak slowly, distinctly and loud enough for all to hear.

Examinations should be limited to direct, cross and re-direct unless there are

exceptional circumstances.

e) Counsel should use the podium for opening and closing statements.

f) Counsel should move all exhibits in a clear voice, identifying each by name

and/or number. If there is no objection, exhibits are automatically admitted.

g) Counsel are expected to edit trial depositions to remove superfluous material.

h) Counsel shall submit Rule 50 motions in writing.

i) At the close of trial, exhibits are released to the custody of the party who

offered them and should be picked up within 24 hours.

BY THE COURT:

_________________________________

MARVIN KATZ, S.J.

Case 2:02-cv-04346-MK Document 85 Filed 07/02/2003 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

DORIS : CIVIL ACTION

:

 :

 v. :

:

 : 

MARRIOTT : NO. 02-2751

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 19

th day of July, 2002, in accordance with the court's

procedure for random reassignment of cases, it is hereby

ORDERED that the above-captioned case is reassigned from the calendar of

the Honorable Eduardo C. Robreno to the calendar of the Honorable Michael M. Baylson.

 FOR THE COURT:

 JAMES T. GILES 

 Chief Judge

 ATTEST:

 ___________________

 MICHAEL E. KUNZ

 Clerk of Court

Case 2:02-cv-02751-MMB Document 5 Filed 07/19/2002 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 220 (Thursday, November 16, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 78754]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-25329]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY


Senior Executive Service Performance Review Board

AGENCY: Federal Labor Relations Authority.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Federal Labor Relations Authority (FLRA) publishes the 
names of the persons selected to serve on its SES Performance Review 
Board (PRB). This notice supersedes all previous notices of the PRB 
membership.

DATES: Effective November 16, 2023.

ADDRESSES: Written comments about this notice can be mailed to the 
Human Resources Division Office, Federal Labor Relations Authority, 
1400 K Street NW, Washington, DC 20424.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Michael Jeffries, Executive Director, 
Federal Labor Relations Authority, 1400 K St. NW, Washington, DC 20424, 
(771) 444-5801, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4924232c2f2f3b202c3a092f253b28672e263f"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="701d1a1516160219150330161c02115e171f06">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 4314(c) of Title 5, U.S.C. requires 
each agency to establish, in accordance with regulations prescribed by 
the Office of Personnel Management, one or more PRBs. The PRB shall 
review and evaluate the initial appraisal of a senior executive's 
performance by the supervisor, along with any response by the senior 
executive, and make recommendations to the final rating authority 
relative to the performance of the senior executive.
    The persons named below have been selected to serve on the FLRA's 
PRB.

PRB Chairman:
    --Michael Jeffries, Executive Director, FLRA, and PRB Chairman
PRB Members:
    --Charlotte Dye, Deputy General Counsel, FLRA
    --Kimberly Moseley, Executive Director, Federal Service Impasses 
Panel, FLRA
    --Timothy Curry, Deputy Associate Director, Accountability and 
Workforce Relations, Workforce Policy and Innovation, U.S. Office of 
Personnel Management
    --Joseph Panteloglous, Director, Human Resources Division, FLRA (Ex 
Officio).

    Dated: November 13, 2023.
Thomas Tso,
Solicitor and Federal Register Liaison, Federal Labor Relations 
Authority.
[FR Doc. 2023-25329 Filed 11-15-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7627-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
IN THE L'l',.;ITED ST A TES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

UNITED STA TES OF AMERICA 

vs. CRIMINAL NO: 2:04CR00506-02 

KEVIN JENKINS 

ORDER 

AND NOW, this 11th day of March 2020, it is hereby ORDERED that due to 

Kevin Jenkins' successful completion of the U.S. Probation Office's Supervision to 

Aid Re-entry Program, his term of supervised release scheduled to expire on September 9, 2023, 

shall be reduced by twelve months. 

BERLE M. SCHILLER 

US DISTRICT COCRT JUDGE