alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 11
                            SOLUCORP INDUSTRIES, LTD.
                    COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                                                     Three Months Ended
                                                                                                          March 31,
                                                                                               ------------------------------
                                                                                                    1998              1997
                                                                                               -------------    -------------

<S>                                                                                             <C>             <C>
Primary Earnings: (*)
  Net Income                                                                                    ($   259,480)   ($   791,491)
                                                                                                ============    ============
Shares
  Weighted average number of common shares issued and outstanding                                 18,725,825      15,252,168

  Assuming conversion of options issued and outstanding (*)                                             --              --
                                                                                                ------------    ------------
  Weighted average number of common shares as adjusted                                            18,725,825      15,252,168
                                                                                                ============    ============

Primary earnings/(loss) per common share (*)                                                    $      (0.01)   $      (0.05)
                                                                                                ============    ============
</TABLE>

----------

(*)  Fully diluted earnings and other computations entailing conversions of
     options and warrants are omitted since they would diminish the loss per
     share.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WALTER CAMPBELL and MARLENE : CIVIL ACTION NO. 05-972

CAMPBELL (h/w) :

:

v. :

:

BANK OF AMERICA, NA :

JUDGMENT

AND NOW, this 11th day of August, 2009, following a bench trial on August 10, 2009,

CIVIL JUDGMENT is entered in favor of Walter and Marlene Campbell and against Bank of

America, NA in the amount of $3,892.00. 

______/s/ Norma L. Shapiro_____________

J.

Case 2:05-cv-00972-NS Document 43 Filed 08/11/09 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 32.0****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO****18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,****AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO****SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**     The certification set forth below is being submitted inconnection with the Quarterly Report of CSK Auto Corporation onForm 10-Q for the period ending July 31, 2005 (the“Report”) for the purpose of complying withRule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d -14(b) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) andSection 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of theUnited States Code.     Maynard L. Jenkins, the Chief Executive Officer and Don W.Watson, the Chief Financial Officer of CSK Auto Corporation,each certifies that to the best of their knowledge:          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of    section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    result of operations of CSK Auto Corporation.     This written statement is being furnished to the Securities andExchange Commission as an exhibit to the Report. A signedoriginal of this statement has been provided to CSK AutoCorporation and will be retained by CSK Auto Corporation andfurnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staffupon request.     /s/ Maynard L. Jenkins       Maynard L. Jenkins *Chief Executive Officer*September 9, 2005     /s/ Don W. Watson       Don W. Watson *Chief Financial Officer*September 9, 2005
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in
connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Belk, Inc. (the
Corporation) for the quarter ended October 30, 2004, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the
undersigned, the Executive Vice President and Chief Executive Officer,
certifies that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Corporation. /s/ Brian T. MarleyBrian T. MarleyExecutive Vice President andChief Financial OfficerDecember 9, 2004
# C_2016165EN.01002202.xml

| 10.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 165/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 165/22

---

Action brought on 14 March 2016 — ZZ v Parliament

(Case F-14/16)

(2016/C 165/30)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: A. Tymen, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Parliament

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Application for annulment of the decision not to renew the applicant’s contract as a member of the contract staff for auxiliary tasks and for damages in respect of the non-material harm allegedly suffered.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Tribunal should:

| — | annul the decision of 28 May 2015 refusing to renew his contract; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of 28 May 2015 refusing to renew his contract;

| — | so far as necessary, annul the implied decision of 31 May 2015 refusing to renew his contract; |
| --- | --- |

—

so far as necessary, annul the implied decision of 31 May 2015 refusing to renew his contract;

| — | so far as necessary, annul the decision of 7 December 2015 rejecting his complaint; |
| --- | --- |

—

so far as necessary, annul the decision of 7 December 2015 rejecting his complaint;

| — | order the defendant to pay damages, fixed on equitable principles at EUR 115 000, by way of compensation for the non-material harm he has suffered; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay damages, fixed on equitable principles at EUR 115 000, by way of compensation for the non-material harm he has suffered;

| — | order the defendant to pay all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay all the costs.

---
# C_2017161EN.01002502.xml

| 22.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 161/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 161/25

---

Judgment of the General Court of 6 April 2017 — Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp v EUIPO — Fink (NANA FINK)

(Case T-39/16) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Figurative mark NANA FINK - Earlier EU word mark NANA - No similarity between the goods - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Extent of the examination to be carried out by the Board of Appeal - Duty to rule on the entirety of the action))

(2017/C 161/35)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp GmbH & Co. KG (Bremen, Germany) (represented by: T. Boddien, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Schifko, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Nadine Fink (Basel, Switzerland)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 November 2015 (Case R 679/2014-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp and Ms Fink.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 12 November 2015 (Case R 679/2014-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp GmbH & Co. KG and Ms Nadine Fink, in so far as the Board of Appeal failed to rule on the action before it with regard to ‘precious metals and their alloys’ in Class 14 of the Nice Agreement concerning the International Classification of Goods and Services for the Purposes of the Registration of Marks of 15 June 1957, as revised and amended, and covered by the figurative mark which was the subject of International Registration No 1111651 designating the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 12 November 2015 (Case R 679/2014-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Nanu-Nana Joachim Hoepp GmbH & Co. KG and Ms Nadine Fink, in so far as the Board of Appeal failed to rule on the action before it with regard to ‘precious metals and their alloys’ in Class 14 of the Nice Agreement concerning the International Classification of Goods and Services for the Purposes of the Registration of Marks of 15 June 1957, as revised and amended, and covered by the figurative mark which was the subject of International Registration No 1111651 designating the European Union;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 106, 21.3.2016.

1

---
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

TYLER J. HADLEY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D22-2923

[March 30, 2023]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Steven J. Levin, Judge; 

L.T. Case No. 562011CF002340A.

Tyler J. Hadley, Okeechobee, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

WARNER, DAMOORGIAN and CONNER, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
# C_2017239EN.01004602.xml

| 24.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 239/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 239/46

---

Judgment of the General Court of 8 June 2017 — Kaane American International Tobacco v EUIPO — Global Tobacco (GOLD MOUNT)

(Case T-294/16) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Revocation proceedings - EU figurative mark GOLD MOUNT - No genuine use of the trade mark - No proper reasons for non-use - Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2017/C 239/58)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Kaane American International Tobacco Company FZE, formerly Kaane American International Tobacco Co. Ltd. (Jebel Ali, United Arab Emirates) (represented by: G. Hinarejos Mulliez and I. Valdelomar, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: H. O’Neill, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervening before the General Court: Global Tobacco FZCO (Dubai, United Arab Emirates) (represented by: G. Hussey, Solicitor, and B. Brandreth, Barrister)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervening before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 8 April 2016 (Case R 1857/2015-4) relating to revocation proceedings between Global Tobacco and Kaane American International Tobacco.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Kaane American International Tobacco Company FZE to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Kaane American International Tobacco Company FZE to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 279, 1.8.2016.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.2



STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF

2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350



The undersigned, Terry Prichard, is the Chief Financial Officer of Pocahontas Bancorp, Inc. (the Company).



This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the
Company of the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2004 (the Report).



By execution of this statement, I certify that:



| | A) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | B) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of the dates and for the
periods covered by the Report.
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



This statement
is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18
U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that this statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.



|                        |  |                   
|----------------------- |  | ------------------
|February 11, 2005 Dated |  | /s/ Terry Prichard
|                        |  | Terry Prichard
# C_2018052EN.01002802.xml

| 12.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 52/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 52/28

---

Order of the General Court of 7 December 2017 — Durazzo v EEAS

(Case T-559/16) (1)

1

((Civil service - Officials - Promotion - 2014 promotion exercise - Acts not adversely affecting an official - Manifest inadmissibility - Decision not to promote the applicant - Article 43 and Article 45(1) of the Staff Regulations - Consideration of comparative merits - Taking into account staff reports for the purpose of promotion - Purely literal assessments - No method enabling staff reports to be compared for the purpose of promotion - Manifestly well-founded action))

(2018/C 052/40)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Giacomo Durazzo (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: N. de Montigny and J.-N. Louis, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European External Action Service (EEAS) (represented by: initially by S. Marquardt and M. Silva, and subsequently by S. Marquardt, acting as Agents, and by M. Troncoso Ferrer, F.-M. Hislaire and S. Moya Izquierdo, lawyers)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking annulment of three acts of the EEAS, namely (i) the proposal for promotion of 11 July 2014 in so far as it concerns Grade AD 13, (ii) the decision of 29 October 2014 not to promote the applicant to Grade AD 13 under the 2014 promotion exercise, and (iii) the decision of 28 May 2015 rejecting the complaint submitted by the applicant against that refusal to promote him.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The decision of the European External Action Service (EEAS) of 29 October 2014 not to promote Mr Giacomo Durazzo to Grade AD 13 under the 2014 promotion exercise is annulled. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The decision of the European External Action Service (EEAS) of 29 October 2014 not to promote Mr Giacomo Durazzo to Grade AD 13 under the 2014 promotion exercise is annulled.

| 2. | The action is dismissed as to the remainder. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The action is dismissed as to the remainder.

| 3. | The EEAS is ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

The EEAS is ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 302, 14.9.2015 (case initially registered before the European Union Civil Service Tribunal as Case F-101/15 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1 September 2016).

1

---
# C_2016392EN.01001001.xml

| 24.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 392/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 392/10

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Łodzi (Poland) lodged on 2 August 2016 — Małgorzata Ciupa and Others v II Szpital Miejski im. L. Rydygiera w Łodzi, now Szpital Ginekologiczno-Położniczy im dr L. Rydygiera Sp. z o.o. w Łodzi

(Case C-429/16)

(2016/C 392/13)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Referring court

Sąd Okręgowy w Łodzi

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Małgorzata Ciupa and Others

Applicants:

Defendant: II Szpital Miejski im. L. Rydygiera w Łodzi, now Szpital Ginekologiczno-Położniczy im dr L. Rydygiera Sp. z o.o. w Łodzi

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

‘Is Article 2 of Directive 98/59/EC (1) to be interpreted as meaning that an employer employing at least 20 employees and who intends to give notices of termination of contractual conditions in relation to a number of employees, as provided for in Article 1(1) of the Law of 13 March 2003 laying down special rules on terminating employment relationships with employees for reasons unrelated to the employees (Ustawa o szczególnych zasadach rozwiązywania z pracownikami stosunków pracy z przyczyn niedotyczących pracowników, Dz. U. 2003, No 90, item 844, as amended), is required to use the procedures specified in Articles 2, 3, 4 and 6 of that law, that is, does that obligation apply in the case of the following articles:

1

| 1. | Article 241(2) 13 in conjunction with Article 241(2) 8 and Article 23 1 of the Labour Code (Kodeks pracy); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Article 241(2) 13 in conjunction with Article 241(2) 8 and Article 23 1 of the Labour Code (Kodeks pracy);

13

8

1

| 2. | Article 241(2) 13 in conjunction with Article 77(5) 2 or Article 241(1) 7 of the Labour Code; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Article 241(2) 13 in conjunction with Article 77(5) 2 or Article 241(1) 7 of the Labour Code;

13

2

7

| 3. | Article 42(1) of the Labour Code in conjunction with Article 45(1) of the Labour Code?’ |
| --- | --- |

3.

Article 42(1) of the Labour Code in conjunction with Article 45(1) of the Labour Code?’

---

(1)  Council Directive 98/59/EC of 20 July 1998 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to collective redundancies; OJ 1998 L 225, p. 16.

1

---
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 15

- 40224 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

JESUS HERNAN DE LA PAZ

,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 1:14

- CR

- 744

- 1

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and HIGGINSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Jesus Hernan De La Paz

raises an argument that is foreclosed by United States v. Betancourt , 586 F.3d

303, 30 8

- 09 (5th Cir. 2009) , which held that knowledge of drug type and

quantity is not an element of a 21 U. S.C. § 841 offense . Accordingly, the motion

for summary disposit i on is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court

is AFFIRMED.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances se t forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED

October 2 2 , 2015

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 15-40224 Document: 00513243191 Page: 1 Date Filed: 10/22/2015
# C_2017112EN.01003201.xml

| 10.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/32

---

Order of the President of the Court of 26 January 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de Navarra — Spain) — Instituto de Religiosas Oblatas del Santísimo Redentor v Joaquín Taberna Carvajal

(Case C-352/16) (1)

1

(2017/C 112/44)

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 326, 5.9.2016.

1

---
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S

N O . W R

- 91,835- 01

E X P A R T E JO SE G R A

N A D O S- G UE V

A R A , A p p l i c an t

O N A P P L I C A T I O N F O R A

W R I T O F H A B E A S C O R P U S C A U SE N O . 1445057- A

I N T H E 185 D I ST R I C T C O U R T T H F R O M H A R R I S C O U

N T Y

P e r c ur i am .

O R D E R

A ppl i c a n t w a s c on v i c t e d of m u r de r a n d s e n t e n c e d t o n i n e t y
- n i n e y e a r s ’ i m pri s on m e n t . T h e Fi r s t

C ou r t of A ppe a l s a f f i r m e d h i s c on v i c ti on

. G r anados

- G ue v ar

a v

. St at e , N o. 01- 16- 00547- C R ( T e x

.

A pp.—H ou s t on [ 1 D i s t ] J u n e 29, 2017) ( n

ot de s i g n a t e d f or pu bl i c a ti on ) . A ppl i c a n t f i l e d t h i s a ppl i c a ti on s t

f or a w ri t of h a be a s c or pu s i n t h e c ou n t y of c on v i c ti on , a n d t h e di s t ri c t c l e r k f or w a r de d i t to t h i s C ou r t

. Se e

T E X

. C O D E C RIM

. P RO C

. a

r t . 11.07.

A ppl i c a n t ’ s a ppl i c a ti on i s w r i t t e n i n Span i s h

. I n or de r f

or t h i s C ou r t t o prope r l

y a ddr e s s

A ppl i c a n t ’ s c l a i m s , t h e t r i a l c ou r t s h ou l d h a v e A ppl i c a n t ’ s m e m or a n du m t r a n s l a t e d by a c e r

ti f i e d t r a n s l a t or

.2

T h i s a ppl i c a ti on w i l l be h e l d i n a be y a n c e u n ti l t h e t ri a l c ou r t h a s obt a i n e d a t r a n s l a t e d a n d c e r ti f i e d

c opy of A ppl i c a n t ’ s m e m or a n d um

. T h e t r a n s l a ti on s h a l l be r e s ol v e d w i t h i n 90 da y s of t h i s or de r

. A

s u ppl e m e n t a l t r a n s c r i pt c on t a i n i n g t h e or i g i n a l m e m or a n du m a n d t h e c e r ti f i e d, t r a n s l a t e d m e m or a n du m s h a l l

be f or w a r de d t o t h i s C ou r t w i t h i n 120 da y s of t h e da t e of t h i s or de r

. A

n y e x t e n s i on s of ti m e s h a l l be

obt a i n e d f r om t h i s C ou r t

.

Fi l e d: O c t obe r 21, 2020 D o n ot pu bl i s h
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
No. 1D 18

- 2423

_____________________________ G ERARD L. B ROOKINS , Appellant,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee.

_____________________________

On appeal from the Circuit Court f or Duval County

. Linda F. McCallum , Judge

. October 16, 2018

P ER C URIAM

.
A FFIRMED

.
R OWE , O STERHAUS , and K ELSEY , JJ., concur.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9 .331

.

_____________________________2 Gerard L. Brookins, pro se
, Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee
, for Appellee.