alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIAID Investigator Initiated Program Project Applications (P01 Clinical Trial Not Allowed).                    

*Date:*                         January 9, 2024.                    

*Time:*                         1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3E71, Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Samita S. Andreansky, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3E71, Rockville, MD 20852, 240-669-2915,                         *samita.andreansky@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: November 7, 2023.

David W. Freeman,

Supervisory Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-24967 Filed 11-9-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
Case 2:05-cv-00417-MAM Document 139 Filed 08/05/08 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:05-cv-00417-MAM Document 139 Filed 08/05/08 Page 2 of 2
### -81 -80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75

37 38 39 40 

## ★ ▲

▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 07/18 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 18 Jul 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.92 N 77.01 WMeters AGL 

## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■



## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★ ● ● ●



## ★ ● ● ● ●
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 7
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS OF MARCH 31, 1999 AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT
OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>                       296,261,447
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>                                0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>                                  0
<EQUITIES>                                           0
<MORTGAGE>                                           0
<REAL-ESTATE>                                        0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                             296,261,447
<CASH>                                      25,764,739
<RECOVER-REINSURE>                                   0
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>                     189,514,383
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                           1,928,041,937
<POLICY-LOSSES>                             27,443,909
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>                                  0
<POLICY-OTHER>                                       0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>                    1,510,638,757
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                                      0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    25,499,999
<OTHER-SE>                                 354,012,080
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>             1,928,041,937
<PREMIUMS>                                  18,247,012
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>                         18,159,060
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>                             263,458
<OTHER-INCOME>                                 239,701
<BENEFITS>                                  19,642,698
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>                  7,405,339
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>                         1,378,915
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              8,482,279
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 8,482,279
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.31
<RESERVE-OPEN>                                       0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>                                  0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>                                    0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>                                   0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                                     0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                                      0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-4 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 1 of 43
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-4 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 2 of 43
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-4 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 3 of 43
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-4 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 4 of 43
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-4 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 5 of 43
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-4 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 6 of 43
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-4 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 7 of 43
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-4 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 8 of 43
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-4 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 9 of 43
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-4 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 10 of 43
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-4 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 11 of 43
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-4 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 12 of 43
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-4 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 13 of 43
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-4 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 14 of 43
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-4 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 15 of 43
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-4 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 16 of 43
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-4 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 17 of 43
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-4 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 18 of 43
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-4 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 19 of 43
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-4 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 20 of 43
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-4 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 21 of 43
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-4 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 22 of 43
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-4 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 23 of 43
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-4 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 24 of 43
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-4 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 25 of 43
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-4 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 26 of 43
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-4 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 27 of 43
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-4 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 28 of 43
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-4 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 29 of 43
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-4 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 30 of 43
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-4 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 31 of 43
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-4 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 32 of 43
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-4 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 33 of 43
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-4 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 34 of 43
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-4 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 35 of 43
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-4 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 36 of 43
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-4 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 37 of 43
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-4 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 38 of 43
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-4 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 39 of 43
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-4 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 40 of 43
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-4 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 41 of 43
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-4 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 42 of 43
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-4 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 43 of 43
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001052971
<NAME> IHLLC
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> US$

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          46,034
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   74,867
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    245,422
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               370,035
<PP&E>                                          78,371
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 798,280
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          459,441
<BONDS>                                        182,820
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,913
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   798,280
<SALES>                                        564,143
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               564,143
<CGS>                                          457,164
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  555,005
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,734)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              15,305
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,723)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,803
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (4,368)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    680
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,688)
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

____________________________________

WIZKIDS CREATIONS CO., :

:

Plaintiff, :

: CIVIL ACTION No. 02-CV-4358

 v. :

:

C.B.S. INC. and :

COLUMBIA BROADCASTING :

SERVICES, INC., :

:

Defendants. :

____________________________________:

ORDER

AND NOW, this ____ day of ______________, 2003, it is hereby ORDERED

that Plaintiff’s Motion Concerning the Burden of Proof is hereby DENIED.

________________________________

Brody, J.

Case 2:02-cv-04358-AB Document 18 Filed 01/28/2003 Page 1 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

____________________________________

WIZKIDS CREATIONS CO., :

:

Plaintiff, :

: CIVIL ACTION No. 02-CV-4358

 v. :

:

C.B.S. INC. and :

COLUMBIA BROADCASTING :

SERVICES, INC., :

:

Defendants. :

____________________________________:

DEFENDANT’S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION CONCERNING THE BURDEN OF PROOF

Defendant Columbia Broadcasting Services Inc. (“CBS”) hereby opposes

plaintiff’s motion entitled “Plaintiff Moves the Court to the Burden of Proof on All Defendants.”

The motion is incomprehensible. Defendant maintains that it has not infringed any copyright or

committed any trespass and reiterates all of the arguments set forth in its pending motion to

dismiss.

Dated: January 28, 2003 Respectfully submitted,

___________________________________

Gayle Chatilo Sproul

DECHERT LLP

4000 Bell Atlantic Tower

1717 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103

Attorney for Defendant

Case 2:02-cv-04358-AB Document 18 Filed 01/28/2003 Page 2 of 3
C:\WIN98\TEMP.HD1F01!.DOC 01/28/03 11:33 AM

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have this date caused a copy of Defendant’s Response in

Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion Concerning the Burden of Proof to be served by first-class mail

upon the plaintiff pro se as follows:

WizKids Creations Co.

c/o Larry Hackney

5422 Chester Avenue

Philadelphia, PA 19143

Dated: January 28, 2003 ___________________________

Gayle Chatilo Sproul

Case 2:02-cv-04358-AB Document 18 Filed 01/28/2003 Page 3 of 3
Final 7/17/09 Page of 

INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT (IRExR) 

 Chemical ID: P090478 

 
Final 7/17/09 Page of 

 INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT 

Chemical ID: P090478 

 

 

 
Final 7/17/09 Page of 

INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT 

 Chemical ID: P090478 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Final 7/17/09 Page of 

INITIAL REVIEW EXPOSURE REPORT 

 Chemical ID: P090478 
Final 7/17/09 Page of 

LEGEND FOR NEW CHEMICALS EXPOSURE REPORT 

This new chemicals exposure report was prepared by the Exposure Assessment Branch (EAB) of the Economics, 

Exposure and Technology Division, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, USEPA. 

The goals of these reports are to calculate conservative (protective) estimates of exposure endpoints for consumers, 

the general population, and the environment. 

For each exposure scenario to industrial releases, the following three endpoints are calculated: 

(1) maximum possible acute concentrations and doses 

(2) maximum possible chronic concentrations and doses 

(3) for water releases ≥ 20 days, the probability of exceedence of the aquatic concentration of concern 

These endpoints are identified by abbreviations on the Release Activity line, e.g., (1) max ADR, (2) max 

LADD, (3) max PDM. Depending on the release inputs, these endpoints may be calculated and presented on 

the same page or different pages. That is, a release activity ID of mfg; max ADR, max PDM, max LADD

indicates that all the exposure endpoints were calculated from common manufacturing release values; 

conversely, a release activity ID of mfg &proc; max ADR indicates that only the maximum acute exposure 

values were calculated for manufacturing and processing releases that occurred at the same site. 

For each consumer product use exposure scenario, whether exposure is to the user directly or to the general 

population/environment, the maximum exposure values are calculated and presented together. 

In addition to the exposure values above, EPA policy directs that exposure and release values be compared to 

criteria threshold values for Exposure-based and PBT Exposure-based cases. 

Exposure-based (YX) cases (those with ≥ 100,000 kg/yr production volume) 

Criteria are exceeded under the following conditions: 

 Presence in consumer product with likely exposure 

≥ 3E-3 mg/kg/d exposure via air, fish ingestion or drinking water 

≥ 10,000 kg/yr release to environment (post-treatment) 

≥ 1,000 kg/yr release to water (post-treatment) 

Persistent, Bioaccumulative, Toxic (PBT) chemicals of P2B2 rating or higher and production volume ≥ 20,000 kg/yr 

Criteria are exceeded as for YX cases, with the following differences: 

≥ 2,000 kg/yr release to environment (post-treatment) 

≥ 200 kg/yr release to water (post-treatment) 

Bolding rules in the Report: Values for endpoints above that are also health or eco concerns are bolded.
Richard Michael DonohooAppellee



# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

June 16, 2015

N o. 04

- 15

- 00291

- CR

The STATE of Texas, Appellant

v.

Richard Michael DONOHOO

, Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 8, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 453259 Celeste Brown, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

In its notice of appeal, the State has requested a stay pursuant to article 44.01(e) of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure. The request is GRANTED, and all proceedings in the underlying cause are STAYED pending final disposition of this appeal. T EX

. C O DE C RIM

. P ROC

. art. 44.01(e).

_________________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 16th day of June, 2015

.

___________________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED AUGUST 1, 2019

NO. 03-18-00680-CV

Austin Tapas, LP d/b/a Malaga Tapas & Bar, and Greg Schnurr, Appellants

v.

Performance Food Group, Inc., Appellee

APPEAL FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES KELLY AND SMITH

AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE

This is an appeal from the judgment signed by the trial court on June 5, 2018. Having reviewed 

the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the 

trial court’s judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment. The appellants

shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this Court and in the court below.
# C_2019082EN.01004401.xml

| 4.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/44

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 December 2018 — Carpenito and Others v Council

(Joined Cases T-543/16 and T-544/16) (1)

((Civil service - Remuneration - Annual adjustment of the remuneration and pensions of officials and other EU staff - Regulations (EU) No 422/2014 and No 423/2014 - Adjustments of salaries and pensions for the years 2011 and 2012 - Duty to state reasons - Proportionality - Legitimate expectations - Rules on social dialogue))

(2019/C 82/50)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant in Case T-543/16: Renzo Carpenito (Overijse, Belgium) (represented by: M. Velardo, lawyer)

Applicants in Case T-544/16: Maria Kannellopoulou (Cranves-Sales, France), José Carlos Lechado García (Brussels, Belgium), Bernd Loescher (Rhode-Saint-Genèse, Belgium), Evelina Milenova (Brussels) (represented by: M. Velardo, lawyer)

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented initially by M. Bauer and M. Veiga and subsequently by M. Bauer and R. Meyer, acting as Agents)

Intervener in support of the defendant: European Parliament (represented by: M. Ecker and E. Taneva, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action under Article 270 TFEU seeking, first, annulment of the Council decisions to apply to the applicants’ salaries or pensions the 0 % adjustment for the year 2011 provided for in Regulation (EU) No 422/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014, adjusting with effect from 1 July 2011 the remuneration and pensions of officials and other servants of the European Union and the correction coefficients applied thereto (OJ 2014 L 129, p. 5), and the 0,8 % adjustment for the year 2012, provided for in Regulation (EU) No 423/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 adjusting with effect from 1 July 2012 the remuneration and pensions of officials and other servants of the European Union and the correction coefficients applied thereto (OJ 2014 L 129, p. 12), and, secondly, compensation for the damage allegedly suffered by the applicants as a result of those decisions.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the actions; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the actions;

| 2. | Orders the applicants to bear their own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the Council of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the applicants to bear their own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the Council of the European Union;

| 3. | Orders the European Parliament to pay its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Parliament to pay its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 146, 4.5.2015 (case initially registered before the European Union Civil Service Tribunal under Case No F-31/15 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1.9.2016).

---
Case No. 14,998.

#### UNITED STATES v. DUFFY et al.

[1 Cranch, C. C. 164.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

June Term, 1804.

Criminal Law—Confessions — Larceny — Property in Goods Stolen.

1. A confession upon oath, before a magistrate, cannot be given in evidence against the prisoner.

2. Possession is prima facie evidence of property.

Indictment [against Thomas Duffy, alias Rustick, and Christopher Duffy] for stealing a cable.

Mr. Taylor, for United States,

produced Mr. Hoffman, the magistrate, to prove what the prisoners had testified before him on an examination of John Duffy, on a charge of stealing the cable; to show that they, being examined separately, had given opposite ahd inconsistent accounts of the cable, and to show their confession upon oath before the magistrate.

THE COURT refused to admit the testimony, upon the authority of 1 McNally, Ev. 47, rule 12; Buller, N. P. 242; Leach, Crown Cas. (1st Ed.; Irish) 248.

The indictment charged the cable to be of the goods and chattels of one Andry.

Mr. Swann, for defendants,

contended that the jury must be satisfied that Andry had a general or special property, and that its being in Andry’s boat, is not sufficient evidence of property.

1

 [Reported by Hon. William Cranch. Chief Judge.]

THE COURT

directed the jury, that a qualified property was sufficient, and that the testimony of its being taken from An-dry’s vessel is competent to go to the jury, and that they must decide whether Andry had a qualified property in the cable.
FD-5—Maturity Distribution and Average Length of Marketable Interest-Bearing Public Debt Held by