alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MARIA C., a minor by and : CIVIL ACTION

through her parent and natural :

guardian, IRIS NEREIDA CAMACHO :

:

v. :

:

THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF :

PHILADELPHIA : NO. 02-4336

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Fullam, Sr. J. October , 2003

Plaintiffs have brought this action to recover

attorneys’ fees and expenses under the Individuals with

Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400-1485 (“IDEA”). 

Defendant has filed a motion to dismiss the complaint. The only

basis alleged in the motion is the assertion that plaintiffs’

action is premature, since plaintiffs have not yet furnished the

defendant with a detailed bill. That problem has long since been

obviated -- plaintiffs have presented defendant with a detailed

bill. 

Defendant’s brief seems to argue that plaintiffs are

not prevailing parties, hence not entitled to recover counsel

fees and expenses. But the complaint repeatedly alleges that

plaintiffs are the prevailing parties and have been granted

relief in final administrative adjudications. And, although

defendant has not filed a motion for summary judgment, the

Case 2:02-cv-04336-JF Document 16 Filed 10/01/2003 Page 1 of 3
2

extensive documentary record which has now been developed makes

clear that plaintiffs are entitled to be reimbursed for at least

some of their counsel fees and expenses. The motion to dismiss

will therefore be denied.

Plaintiffs will be directed to furnish this Court with

plaintiffs’ final calculation and explanation of the fees sought;

defendant will be afforded a reasonable time in which to dispute

all or part of the amounts sought. In the unlikely event that an

evidentiary hearing is required, one will be scheduled. This

Court will make an appropriate allowance when the record is

complete. 

An Order follows.

Case 2:02-cv-04336-JF Document 16 Filed 10/01/2003 Page 2 of 3
3

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MARIA C., a minor by and : CIVIL ACTION

through her parent and natural :

guardian, IRIS NEREIDA CAMACHO :

:

v. :

:

THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF :

PHILADELPHIA : NO. 02-4336

ORDER

AND NOW, this day of October 2003, IT IS ORDERED:

1. Defendant’s motion to dismiss is DENIED.

2. Plaintiffs shall, within ten days, submit to this

Court and to the defendant a current statement and explanation of

the amounts of attorney’s fees and expenses sought. Within ten

days thereafter, defendant may challenge any or all of the fees

and expenses. This Court will thereupon either resolve the

issue, or schedule an evidentiary hearing if required. 

 

John P. Fullam, Sr. J.

Case 2:02-cv-04336-JF Document 16 Filed 10/01/2003 Page 3 of 3
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 168 

Note 30. Subsequent Events 

Additional Notes Purchased by Treasury 

Similar to the transaction that is described in Note 4—Loans Receivable, Net and Loan Guarantee Liabilities, in January 

2024, Treasury purchased four additional notes in connection with Silicon Valley Bridge Bank, N.A. for a total of $43.3 

billion, guaranteed by the FDIC in its corporate capacity as deposit insurer and regulator.
(Reap. Dec. 10950)

#### American Roland Corp. *v.*United States

Entry No. 859862.

(Decided April 13, 1965)

*Eugene B. Pielcrell*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Doug las,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the Plaintiff and the Assistant Attorney General for the United States, Defendant, subject to the approval of the Court, that:

> 1. The merchandise marked “A” and initialed ECA by Examiner E. Alfano on the invoice herein consists of Ascorbic Acid, exported from Denmark to the United States during the period from October 1, 1963 through December 30, 1963.

> 2. Ascorbic Acid is on the final list promulgated by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, published as T.D. 54521 in the Federal Register, issue of Janu-uary 20,1958.

> 3. At the time of exportation of such merchandise, its export value within the meaning of Section 402a (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, was less than its foreign value within the meaning of Section 402a (c) of that Act.

> *6224. At the time of exportation to the United States of the merchandise herein, the market value or the price at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale for home consumption to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature, and all other costs, charges, and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition, packed ready for shipment to the United States, was 24.50 D.K. per kilo plus $0.02 per kilo for export packing.

> 5. This appeal for reappraisement may be submitted on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find and hold foreign value, as that value is defined in section 402a (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise herein involved and that such value was 24.50 DKr per kilo, plus $0.02 per kilo for export packing.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
Case No. 8,376.

#### LINTHECUM v. JONES.

[4 Cranch, C. C. 572.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

March Term, 1835.

Execution — When may be Quashed.

An execution cannot now be quashed at this term, which is not returnable until the next term.

This was a rule to show cause why a fieri facias, returnable at the next' term, should not be quashed, because the judgment was of more than twelve years’ standing.

THE COURT did not decide the principal question intended to be raised, being of opinion that the execution should not now be quashed.

Before CRANCH, Chief Judge, and MOR-SELLand THRUSTON, Circuit Judges.

MORSELL, Circuit Judge,

was of the opinion that execution should be quashed.

THRUSTON, Circuit Judge,

thought that the court had jurisdiction now to quash the execution, although not returnable until the next term, but that the defendant ought to have an opportunity to plead the statute of limitations.

CRANCH, Chief Judge,

was of the opinion that the court now, at this term, has no jurisdiction to quash the execution, which is not returnable until the next term. Motion to quash, overruled.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

I, Donald L. Tatzin, certify that:

 

1.     I have reviewed this report on Form 10-Q of AXT, Inc.;

 

2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

(a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

(b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

 

(c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.     I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors:

 

(a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

 

(b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 
| Dated: August 5, 2004 | By:    | /s/ Donald L. Tatzin            |
|-----------------------|--------|---------------------------------|
|                  |   | Donald L. Tatzin                |
|                  |   | Interim Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Exhibit 99.1

           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SUBSECTION 1350
              AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION 906 OF THE
                       SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Mark Ellis, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Universal
Broadband Communications, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and
have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is
being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in
this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in
internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,
including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies
and material weaknesses.

Date: December 5, 2002
                              /s/ Mark Ellis
                            ----------------
                               Mark Ellis
                         Chief Executive Officer
IIB

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1089

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

APRIL 4, 2000

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and

Urban Affairs

AN ACT

To require the Securities and Exchange Commission to require the improved disclosure of after-tax returns regarding mutual fund performance, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

HR 1089 RFS

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Mutual Fund Tax

3 Awareness Act of 2000’’.

4 SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

5 The Congress finds the following:

6 (1) Taxes can be the single biggest cost associ7 ated with mutual funds. The average stock fund in8 vestor has lost up to 3 percentage points of return

9 every year to taxes.

10 (2) The average portfolio turnover rate for an

11 actively managed (nonindex) fund has increased

12 from 30 percent 20 years ago to almost 90 percent

13 today, and average capital gains distributions of

14 growth funds, per share, have more than doubled in

15 the last 10 years.

16 (3) If a fund’s performance is based mostly on

17 short-term gains, investors can lose a significant

18 part of their return to taxes.

19 (4) Performance figures that mutual funds gen20 erally disclose to their shareholders are net of fees

21 and expenses, but not taxes, and therefore do not

22 represent the impact taxes have on an investor’s re23 turn.

24 (5) This disclosure focuses on how much money

25 investors made before taxes, and not on how much

26 money investors actually got to keep.
3

HR 1089 RFS

1 (6) Improved disclosure of the effect of taxes on

2 mutual fund performance would allow shareholders

3 to compare after-tax returns to raw performance,

4 and would permit the investors to determine whether

5 the fund manager tries to minimize tax con6 sequences for shareholders.

7 (7) While the mutual fund prospectus details

8 the average annual portfolio turnover rate, the pro9 spectus may not expressly inform shareholders about

10 the impact the portfolio turnover rate has on total

11 returns.

12 SEC. 3. IMPROVEMENTS IN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS.

13 Within 18 months after the date of the enactment

14 of this Act, the Securities and Exchange Commission shall

15 revise regulations under the Securities Act of 1933 and

16 the Investment Company Act of 1940 to require, con17 sistent with the protection of investors and the public in18 terest, improved disclosure in investment company

19 prospectuses or annual reports of after-tax returns to in20 vestors.

Passed the House of Representatives April 3, 2000.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
No. 62490.

#### J. J. Boll *v.*United States,

protests 326890-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protests were dismissed for lack of prosecution.
Bureau of the Fiscal Service Printable Job Aid – Download and Import Entrust Certificates

Last Updated on 09/23/2016 1

 Download and Import Entrust Certificates (Java certificate store)

To download and import the Entrust Certificates to the Java certificate store, have a user with 

local workstation administrative privileges complete the following steps:

1. Download the Entrust Certificates to the desktop:

Entrust L1K (https://www.entrust.com/root-certificates/entrust_l1k.cer) 

Entrust G2 (https://www.entrust.com/root-certificates/entrust_g2_ca.cer)

2. Access your Control Panel under Start > Control Panel

3. Enter Java Control Panel in the Control Panel Search

4. Click the Java icon to open the Java Control Panel 

5. Under the Security tab, click Manage Certificates
Bureau of the Fiscal Service Printable Job Aid – Download and Import Entrust Certificates

Last Updated on 09/23/2016 2

6. From the Certificate type drop-down field, select Secure Site CA and then click 

Import.

7. Navigate to the Desktop, change the files of type to All Files, and select 

entrust_g2_ca.cer and then click Open.

8. Again from the Certificate type drop-down field, select Secure Site CA and then

click Import.
Bureau of the Fiscal Service Printable Job Aid – Download and Import Entrust Certificates

Last Updated on 09/23/2016 3

9. Navigate to the Desktop and select the entrust_l1k.cer file and then click Open.

10. Click Ok to close the Java Control Panel
No. 65411.

#### , and J. J. Murphy & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 310436-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of Rockingham earthenware similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Justin Tharaud & Son, Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(44 Cust. Ct. 216, C.D. 2177), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
```

                                                               Exhibit 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

        In connection with the Annual Report of SkyWay Communications Holding Corp.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ending April 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, James Kent, acting in the capacity as the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify to the best of my knowledge, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
            Company.

Date:  July 29, 2004                                  /s/ James Kent
                                                      James Kent
                                                      CEO and CFO
```
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. Section 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Ardent Mines Limited (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date here of (the "report"), I, Taras Chebountchak, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    
| | (2) | The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| |    

Dated this 28th day of September, 2007.

TARAS CHEBOUNTCHAKTaras ChebountchakChief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer






































---
Timothy J. Bergère 

Admitted in Pennsylvania 

123 South Broad Street 

Avenue of the Arts 

Philadelphia, PA 19109 

Tel: 215-772-1500 

Direct Dial: 215-772-7431 

Fax: 215-772-7620 

Email: tbergere@mmwr.com 

August 17, 2016 

VIA ELECTRONIC MAIL 

The Honorable Joel H. Slomsky 

United States District Judge 

United States District Court for the 

 Eastern District of Pennsylvania 

601 Market Street, Room 5614 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106 

 Re: Petition of Frescati Shipping Co. Ltd. 

 Civil Action No. 05-CV-305(JHS) 

 U.S. v. Citgo Asphalt Refining Co., et al. 

 Civil Action No. 08-CV-2898(JHS)_____ 

Dear Judge Slomsky: 

 I apologize for any confusion my letter filed a moment ago may have caused. My letter, 

filed as ECF Doc. 886, inadvertently referred to the letter sent by CARCO as Mr. Bissell’s letter. 

In fact, it was Mr. Walker’s letter, so my appreciation extends to him as well. 

 ` Sincerely 

 Timothy J. Bergère s/s 

 Timothy J. Bergère (ID No. 39110) 

 Counsel to Frescati Shipping Co., Ltd 

 and Tsakos Shipping & Trading S.A. 

cc: John J. Levy, Esq. [Via electronic mail] 

 Alfred J. Kuffler, Esq. [Via electronic mail] 

 Eugene O’Connor, Esq. [Via electronic mail] 
The Honorable Joel H. Slomsky 

August 17, 2016 

Page 2 

Montgomery McCracken Walker & Rhoads LLP 

 Tricia Sadd, Esq. [Via electronic mail] 

 Derek A. Walker, Esq. [Via electronic mail]] 

 Richard Q. Whelan, Esq. [Via electronic mail] 

 Frank P. DeGiulio, Esq. [Via electronic mail] 

 John G. Bissell, Esq. [Via electronic mail] 

 Stephen Flynn, Esq. [Via electronic mail]
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta name="pdf:PDFVersion" content="1.2">
<meta name="xmp:CreatorTool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="pdf:hasXFA" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:modify_annotations" content="true">
<meta name="dc:creator" content="sjh">
<meta name="dcterms:created" content="1998-04-15T14:53:47Z">
<meta name="dcterms:modified" content="1998-04-15T14:53:51Z">
<meta name="dc:format" content="application/pdf; version=1.2">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator_tool" content="Acrobat Capture Server 2.0">
<meta name="access_permission:fill_in_form" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:modified" content="1998-04-15T14:53:51Z">
<meta name="pdf:hasCollection" content="false">
<meta name="pdf:encrypted" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Length" content="58570">
<meta name="pdf:hasMarkedContent" content="false">
<meta name="Content-Type" content="application/pdf">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print_faithful" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:creator" content="sjh">
<meta name="pdf:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_for_accessibility" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:assemble_document" content="true">
<meta name="xmpTPg:NPages" content="2">
<meta name="pdf:hasXMP" content="false">
<meta name="access_permission:extract_content" content="true">
<meta name="access_permission:can_print" content="true">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.DefaultParser">
<meta name="X-TIKA:Parsed-By" content="org.apache.tika.parser.pdf.PDFParser">
<meta name="access_permission:can_modify" content="true">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:producer" content="Acrobat PDFWriter 3.02 for Windows NT">
<meta name="pdf:docinfo:created" content="1998-04-15T14:53:47Z">
<title></title>
</head>
<body><div class="page"><p></p>
<p>OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 
AUSTIN </p>
<p></p>
</div>
<div class="page"><p></p>
<p>. . 
</p>
<p>Eon.TomI.Oolemaa,~anua~ 84,19SQ -10.8 
</p>
<p>~Trusting the foregoing anewern ywu 
inquiry, I remin 
</p>
<p>t </p>
<p></p>
</div>
</body></html>
No. 67791.

#### Ross Products, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 62/15518 (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *Falcon Sales Company*and *J. J. Murphy & Co.*v. *United States*(47 Cust. Ct. 129, C.D. 2292), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.