# August 11

, 2015

Exemption No. 12440

Regulatory Docket No. FAA

– 20 15

– 1948

Mr. Jason Spiewak

dba Spiewak Photography

1900 N orth Bayshore Drive, 3004

Miami, FL 33132

Dear Mr. Spiewak :

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your request for exemption. It transmits our

decision, explains its basis, and gives you the conditions and limitations of the exemption,

including the date it ends.

By letter dated May 13, 2015 , you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) on

behalf of Spiewak Photography ( hereinafter petitioner or operator ) for an exe mption . The

petitioner requested to operate an unmanned ai rcraft system (UAS) to conduct aerial

cinematography and photography

.

See Appendix A for the petition submitted to the FAA des cribing the proposed operations and

the regulations that the petitioner seeks an exemption

.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to the petitioner

.

Airworthiness Certification

The UAS proposed by the petitioner is a DJI Phantom 2

.

The petitioner requested relief from 14 CFR part 21, C ertification procedures for products

and parts, Subpart H

— Airworthiness Certificates

. In accordance with the statutory criteria

provided in Section 333 of P ublic Law 112

− 95 in reference to 49 U

. S

. C

. § 44704, and in

consideration of the size, weight, speed, and limited operating area associated with the

# 2

aircraft and its operation, the Secr etary of Transportation has determined that this aircraft

meets the conditions of Section 333. Therefore, the FAA finds that the requested relief from

14 CFR part 21

, C ertification procedures for products and parts, Subpart H

— Airworthiness

Certificates

, and any associated noise certification and testing requirements of part 36, is

not necessary.

The Basis for Our Decision

You have requested to use a UAS for aerial data collection 1



# . The FAA has issued grants of

exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to those presented in your petition.

In Grants of Exemption No s

. 11062 to Astraeus Aerial ( see Docket No. FAA−2014−0352),

11109 to Clayco, Inc. ( see Docket No. FAA

− 2014

− 0507), 11112 to VDOS Global, LLC ( see

Docket No. FAA−2014−0382), and 11213 to Aeryon Lab s , Inc. ( see Docket No.

FAA−2014−0642), the FAA found that the enhanced safety achieved using an unmanned

aircraft (UA) with the specifications described by the petitioner and carrying no passengers or

crew, rather t han a manned aircraft of significantly greater proportions, carrying crew in

addition to flammable fuel, gives the FAA good cause to find that the UAS operation enabled

by this exemption is in the public interest.

Having reviewed your reasons for requesti ng an exemption, I find that

—

 They are similar in all material respects to relief previously requested in Grant of

Exemption Nos. 11062, 11109, 11112, and 11213 ;

 The reasons stated by the FAA for granting Exemption Nos. 11062, 11109, 11112, and

11213 also apply to the situation you present; and

 A grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Our Decision

In consideration of the foregoing, I find that a grant of exemption is in the public interest.

Therefore, pursuant to the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 106(f), 40113, and 44701,

delegated to me by the Administrator, Spiewak Photography is granted an exemption from

14 CFR §§ 61.23(a) and ( c ), 61.101(e)(4 ) and (5), 61.113(a), 61.315(a) , 91.7(a), 91.119(c),

91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b), to

the extent necessary to allow the petitioner to operate a UAS to perform aerial data collection

. This exemption is subject to the conditions and limitations lis ted below.

1 

# Aerial data collection includes any remote sensing and measuring by an instrument(s) aboard the UA.

Examples include imagery (photography, video, infrared, etc.), electronic measurement (precision surveying, RF

analysis, etc.), chemical measurement (part iculate measurement, etc.), or any other gathering of data by

instruments aboard the UA.

# 3

Conditions and Limitations

In this grant of exemption, Spiewak Photography is hereafter referred to as the operator.

Failure to comply with any of the conditions and limitations of this grant of exemption will be

grounds for the immediate suspension or rescission of this exemption.

1. Operations authorized by this grant of exemption are limited to the DJI Phantom 2

when weighing less than 55 pounds including payload. Proposed operations of any

other aircraft will require a new petition or a petition to amend this exemption

.

2. Operations for the purpose of closed

- set motion picture and television filming are

not permitted.

3. The UA may not be operated at a speed exceeding 87 knots (100 miles per hour). The

exemption holder may use either groun dspeed or calibrated airspeed to determine

compliance with the 87 knot speed restriction. In no case will the UA be operated at

airspeeds greater than the maximum UA operating airspeed recommended by the

aircraft manufacturer.

4. The UA must be operated at an altitude of no more than 400 feet above ground level

(AGL). Altitude must be reported in feet AGL.

5. The UA must be operated within visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC at all times.

This requires the PIC to be able to use human vision unaided by any device other than

corrective lenses, as specified on the PIC’s FAA

- issued airman medical certificate or

U.S. driver’s license.

6. All operations must utilize a visual observer (VO). The UA must be operated within

the visual line of sight (VLOS) of the PIC and VO at all times. The VO may be used

to satisfy the VLOS requirement as long as the PIC always maintains VLOS

capability. The VO and PIC must be able to communicate verbally at all times ;

e lectronic messaging or texting is not permitted during flight operations. The PIC

must be designated before the flight and cannot transfer his or her designation for the

duration of the flight. The PIC must ensure that the VO can perform the duties

required of the VO.

7. This exemption and all documents needed to op erate the UAS and conduct its

operations in accordance with the conditions and limitations stated in this grant of

exemption, are hereinafter referred to as the operating documents. The operating

documents must be accessible during UAS operations and made available to the

Administrator upon request. If a discrepancy exists between the conditions and

limitations in this exemption and the procedures outlined in the operating documents,

the conditions and limitations herein take precedence and must be follow ed.

# 4

Otherwise, the operator must follow the procedures as outlined in its operating

documents. The operator may update or revise its operating documents. It is the

operator’s responsibility to track such revisions and present updated and revised

documen ts to the Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request. The

operator must also present updated and revised documents if it petitions for extension

or amendment to this grant of exemption. If the operator determines that any update

or revisi on would affect the basis upon which the FAA granted this exemption, then

the operator must petition for an amendment to its grant of exemption. The FA A’s

UAS Integration Office (AFS− 80) may be contacted if questions arise regarding

updates or revisions t o the operating documents.

8. Any UAS that has undergone maintenance or alterations that affect the UAS operation

or flight characteristics, e.g.

, replacement of a flight critical component, must undergo

a functional test flight prior to conducting further o perations under this exemption.

Functional test flights may only be conducted by a PIC with a VO and must remain at

least 500 feet from other people. The functional test flight must be conducted in such

a manner so as to not pose an undue hazard to perso ns and property.

9. The operator is responsible for maintaining and inspecting the UAS to ensure that it is

in a condition for safe operation.

10. Prior to each flight, the PIC must conduct a pre

- flight inspection and determine the

UAS is in a condition for saf e flight. The pre

- flight inspection must account for all

potential discrepancies, e.g.

, inoperable components, items, or equipment. If the

inspection reveals a condition that affects the safe operation of the UAS, the aircraft is

prohibited from operatin g until the necessary maintenance has been performed and the

UAS is found to be in a condition for safe flight.

11. The operator must follow the UAS manufacturer’s maintenance, overhaul,

replacement, inspection, and life limit requirements for the aircraft an d

aircraft components.

12. Each UAS operated under this exemption must comply with all manufacturer

safety bulletins.

13. Under this grant of exemption, a PIC must hold either an airline transport,

commercial, private, recreational, or sport pilot certificate. The PIC must also hold a

current FAA airman medical certificate or a valid U.S. driver’s license issued by a

state, the District of Col u mbia, Puerto Rico, a territory, a possession, or the Federal

government. The PIC must also meet the flight revi ew requi rements specified in

14 CFR § 61.56 in an aircraft in which the PIC is rated on his or her pilot certificate.

14. The operator may not permit any PIC to operate unless the PIC demonstrates the

ability to safely operate the UAS in a manner consistent with how the UAS will be

# 5

operated under this exemption, including evasive and emergency maneuvers and

maintaining approp riate distances from persons, vessels, vehicles and structures. PIC

qualification flight hours and currency must be logged in a manner consistent with

14 CFR § 61.51(b). Flights for the purposes of training the operator’s PICs and VOs

(traini ng, proficie ncy, and experience

- building) and determining the PIC’s ability to

safely operate the UAS in a manner consistent with how the UAS will be operated

under this exemption are permitted under the terms of this exemption. However,

training operations may only be conducted during dedicated training sessions. During

traini ng, proficiency, and experience

- building flights, all persons not essential for

flight operations are considered nonparticipants, and the PIC must operate the UA

with appropriate distance from nonparticipants in accordance with 14 CFR § 91.119.

15. UAS operations may not be conducted during night, as defined in 14 CFR § 1.1. All

operations must be conducted under visual meteorological conditions (VMC). Flights

under special visual flight rules (S VFR) are not authorized.

16. The UA may not operate within 5 nautical miles of an airport reference point (ARP) as

denoted in the current FAA Airport/Facility Directory (AFD) or for airports not

denoted with an ARP, the center of the airport symbo l as denoted on the current

FAA

- published aeronautical chart, unless a letter of agreement with that airport’s

management is obtained or otherwise permitted by a COA issued to the exemption

holder. The letter of agreement with the airport management must be made avail able

to the Administrator or any law enforcement official upon request.

17. The UA may not be operated less than 500 feet below or less than 2,000 feet

horizontally from a cloud or when visibility is less than 3 statute miles from the PIC.

18. If the UAS loses c ommunications or loses its GPS sign al, the UA must return to a

pre

- determined location within the pr ivate or controlled

- access property.

19. The PIC must abort the flight in the event of unpredicted obstacles or emergencies.

20. The PIC is prohibited from beginn ing a flight unless (considering wind and forecast

weather conditions) there is enough available power for the UA to conduct the

intended operation and to operate after that for at least five minutes or with the reserve

power recommended by the manufacture r if greater.

21. Air Traffic Organization (ATO) Certificate of Waiver or Authorization (COA). All

operations shall be cond ucted in accordance with an ATO

- issued COA. The

exemption holder may apply for a new or amended COA if it intends to conduct

operation s that cannot be conducted under the terms of the attached COA

.

22. All aircraft operated in accordance with this exemption must be identified by serial

number, registered in accordance with 14 CFR part 47, and have identification

# 6

(N− Number) markings in accor dance with 14 CFR part 45, Subpart C. Markings must

be as large as practicable.

23. Documents used by the operator to ensure the safe operation and flight of the UAS and

any documents required under 14 CFR §§ 91.9 and 91.203 must be available to the

PIC at t he Ground Control Station of the UAS any time the aircraft is operating.

These documents must be made available to the Administrator or any law enforcement

official upon request.

24. The UA must remain clear and give way to all manned aviation operations and

activities at all times.

25. The UAS may not be operated by the PIC from any moving device or vehicle.

26. All Flight operations must be conducted at least 500 feet from all nonpartici pating

persons, vessels, vehicles, and structures unless:

a. Barriers or structures are present that sufficiently protect nonparticipating persons

from the UA and/or debris in the event of an accident. The operator must ensure

that nonparticipating persons r emain under such protection. If a situation arises

where nonparticipating persons leave such protection and are within 500 feet of

the UA, flight operations must cease immediately in a manner ensuring the safety

of nonparticipating persons ; and

b. The owner/ controller of any vessels, vehicles or structures has granted permission

for operating closer to those objects and the PIC has made a safety assessment of

the risk of operating closer to those objects and determined that it does not

present an undue hazard

.

The PIC, VO, operator trainees or essential persons are not considered

nonparticipating persons under this exemption.

27. All operations shall be conducted over private or control led

- access property with

permission from the property owner/controller or aut horized representative.

Permission from property owner/controller or authorized representative will be

obtained for each flight to be conducted.

28. Any incident, accident, or flight operation that transgresses the lateral or vertical

boundaries of the opera tional area as defined by the applicable COA must be reported

to the FA A's UAS Integration Office (AFS− 80) within 24 hours. Accidents must be

reported to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) per instructions

contained on the NTSB Web site: www.ntsb.gov

.

If this exemption permits operations for the purpose of closed

- set motion picture and

television filming and production, the following additional conditions and limitations apply.

# 7

29. The operator must have a mot ion picture and television operations manual (MPTOM)

as documented in this grant of exemption.

30. At least 3 days before aerial filming, the operator of the UAS affected by this

exemption must submit a written Plan of Activities to the local Flight Standards

District Office (FSDO) with jurisdiction over the a rea of proposed filming. The 3

- day

notification may be waived with the concurrence of the FSDO. The plan of activities

must include at least the following:

a. Dates and times for all flights;

b. Name and phon e number of the operator for the UAS aerial filming conducted

under this grant of exemption;

c. Name and phone number of th e person responsible for the on

- scene operation of

the UAS;

d. Make, model, and serial or N− Number of UAS to be used;

e. Name and certificate number of UAS PICs involved in the aerial filming;

f. A statement that the operator has obtained permission from property owners

and/or local officials to conduct the filming production event; the list of those

who gave permission must be made available to th e inspector upon request;

g. Signature of exemption holder or representative; and

h. A description of the flight activity, including maps or diagrams of any area, city,

town, county, and/or state over which filming will be conducted and the altitudes

essential t o accomplish the operation.

31. Flight operations may be conducted closer than 500 feet from participating persons

consenting to be involved and necessary for the filming production, as specified in the

exemption holder’s MPTOM.

Unless otherwise specified in this grant of exemption, the UAS, the UAS PIC, and the UAS

operations must comply with all applicable parts of 14 CFR including, but not limited to,

parts 45, 47, 61, and 91.

# 8

This exemption terminates on August 31, 2017 , unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/s/

John S. Duncan

Director, Flight Standards Service

EnclosuresMay13,2015UnitedStatesDepartmentofTransportationDocketManagementSystem1200NewJerseyAve.,SEWestBuildingGroundFloorRoomW12-140Washington,DC20590Re:ExemptionRequestPursuanttoSection333oftheFAAReformActof2012DearSirorMadam:IamwritingpursuanttotheFAAModernizationandReformActof2012(the"ReformAct")andtheprocedurescontainedin14C.F.R.11,torequestthatJasonSpiewakd/b/aSpiewakPhotography,anownerandoperatorofsmallunmannedaircraft,beexemptedfromtheFederalAviationRegulations("FARs")listedbelowsothatJasonSpiewakd/b/aSpiewakPhotographymayoperateitssmallunmannedaircraftIlightweightunmannedaircraftsystems("UAS")commerciallyinairspaceregulatedbytheFederalAviationAdministration("FAA");aslongassuchoperationsareconductedwithinandundertheconditionsoutlinedhereinorasmaybeestablishedbytheFAAasrequiredbySection333.TheconditionsidentifiedandproposedbytheapplicantaredrawnfromOrder8900.1CHG0,Volume3,Chapter8-IssueaCertificateofWaiverforMotionPictureandTelevisionFilming.Asidentifiedanddescribedherein,JasonSpiewak,andhiscompanySpiewakPhotography,isexperiencedandrecognizedinthemarketingmediaindustry.Mr.Spiewakandhispreviouscompanieshavebeenprovidingmarketingmediafortherealestateandluxurylifestyleindustryforthepasttwo(2)years.Mr.SpiewakhasalsobeenanavidR/Cmodelflyerandoperatorforovertwelve(12)years.Mr.SpiewakhasbeenapproachedbymanynewandexistingclientsseekingtoengagehismarketingmediaservicesincludinglargerealestatefirmssuchasSotheby's.JasonSpiewakhasbeenactivelyinvolvedinthetechnicaldevelopmentofUAS/UAVserviceapplicationstoprovidehighdefinitionpicturesandfilmbyaerialcinematographyandphotographywithsmall,unmannedaircraftandlightweightUASs.Itiscurrentlyoneoftheveryfewindividualsthatisdevelopingadvancedtechnicalapplicationsandabilitiesforfuturecommercialserviceapplications.SpiewakPhotographyhasfullyequippedeachofitssmallunmannedaircraftforaerialphotographyandcinematography,primarilyforuseinmarketingmaterialsandtelevisionbroadcast,thoughgiventheirstabilityandmaneuverability,theymaybeusedforothercinematographyandphotography,bylawenforcementpersonnel,searchandrescueandbyotherfirstresponders.Todate,SpiewakPhotographyhasrejectedallofferstoworkwithcommercialtelevisionproductioncompanies,realestatefirms,andyachtbrokeragesonlocationswithintheUnitedStates,toensureitisincompliancewithanyapplicableFARs.It,likeotherapplicants,hasdonesodespiteJudgePatrickG.Geraghty'sdecisionintheRaphaelPrikermatterandhisreasoningthatnoFARsprohibittheuseofsmallunmannedaircraftorlightweightUASslikethoseflownbyotherpeercompanies.SpiewakPhotography'sexemptionrequestwouldpermititsoperationoflightweight,unmanned(remotelycontrolledinlineofsight)UASsintightlycontrolledandlimitedairspace.Predetermined,specificallymarkedareasofoperation,cordonedofflocationsandcorrespondingenhancementstocurrentsafetycontrolswillallowSpiewakPhotographytooperatewithincurrentsafetyparametersandnewonesbeingimplemented.Asidentified,similarlightweight,remotecontrolledUASsarelegallyoperatedbyamateurswithnoflightexperience,safetyplanorcontrolsinplacetopreventcatastrophe.SpiewakPhotographywillmonitor,evaluate,andimplementallaerialphotographyandcinematographyactivitieswithapre-flightsafetyandflightplansystem.ThiswillacttofurthersafetyprotocolsexclusivetolightweightUAS'sspecifictorealestatevideoandphotographyusageasSpiewakPhotographyrecordsflightdataandotherinformationgainedthroughpermittedflightoperationstosharewiththeFAAthroughanyrequiredFAAreportstoassistwithfutureprotocolandsafetyregulation.GrantingSpiewakPhotography'srequestcomportswiththeSecretaryofTransportation's(FAAAdministrator)responsibilitiestonotonlyintegrateUASsintothenationairspacesystem,butto"...establishrequirementsforthesafeoperationofsuchaircraftsystems[UASs]inthenationalairspacesystem"underSection333(c)oftheReformActFurther,SpiewakPhotographywillconductitsoperationsincompliancewiththeprotocolsdescribedhereinorasotherwiseestablishedbytheFAA.SpiewakPhotographyrespectfullyrequeststhegrantofanexemptionallowingittooperatelightweight,remotecontrolledUAS's.NameandAddressofthePetitioner:JasonSpiewakd/b/aSpiewakPhotography1900NBayshoreDrive,3004Miami,Florida33132(305)812-1211jasonspiewak@gmail.comTheSpecificSectionsofTitle14oftheCodeofFederalRegulations,SpiewakPhotographyRequestsExemptionare:14CFR21;14C.F.R.45.23(b);14CFR61.113(a)&(b);14C.F.R.91,etseq.;14CFR407(a)(1);14CFR409(a)(2);and14CFR417(a)&(b)ExemptionRequestSection333oftheFAAReformActandPart11oftheFederalAviationRegulationsfrom14C.F.R.45.23(b);14CFRPart21;14CFR61.113(a)&(b);91.7(a);91.9(b)(2);91.103(b);91.109;91.119;91.121;91.151(a);91.203(a)&(b);91.405(a);91.407(a)(1);91.409(a)(2);91.417(a)&(b).TheExtentofReliefSpiewakPhotographySeeksandtheReasonitSeeksSuchRelief:JasonSpiewaksubmitsthisapplicationinaccordancewiththeReformAct,112P.L.95§§331-334,seekingrelieffromanycurrentlyapplicableFARsoperatingtopreventSpiewakPhotographyfrompursuingcontemplatedcommercialcinematic,academic,researchandotherflightoperationswithinthenationalairspacesystem.TheReformActinSection332providesforsuchintegrationofcivilunmannedaircraftsystemsintoournationalairspacesystemasitisinthepublic'sinteresttodoso.TheDJIPhantom2,operatedbySpiewakPhotography,isanultralightweightUASandmeetsthedefinitionof"smallunmannedaircraft"asdefinedinSection331;therefore,theintegrationofSpiewakPhotography'sultralightweightUASisexpresslycontemplatedbytheReformAct.SpiewakPhotographywouldliketooperateit'sultralightweightUASpriortothetimeperiodbywhichtheReformActrequirestheFAAtopromulgaterulesgoverningsuchcraft.Thereby,providingdirectexperienceandvaluableinformationforformalregulationthatcanbeadministereduniformlytoallrealestateandmarketingrelatedUASaerialvideoandphotography.TheReformActguidestheSecretaryindeterminingthetypesofUAS'sthatmayoperatesafelyinournationalairspacesystem.Considerationsinclude:weight,size,speed,andoverallcapabilityoftheUAS's;whethertheUASwillbeoperatednearairportsorheavilypopulatedareas;andwhethertheUASwillbeoperatedbylineofsight.112P.L.95§333(a).EachoftheseitemsreflectinfavorofanexemptionforJasonSpiewakd/b/aSpiewakPhotography.SpiewakPhotography'sUASutilizesfour(4)counter-rotatingpropellersforextremebalance,control,andstability.TheUASisequippedwithGPSandautoreturnsafetytechnology.Weighinglessthanten(10)pounds(wellbelowthemaximum55poundlimit);includingcamerawithgimbal.SpiewakPhotographyconsiderssafetyasforemostwitheachflight.ThesmallunmannedaircraftisdesignedtohoverinplaceviaGPSandoperatedinlessthan24knotwind.Forsafety,stability,andfearoffinanciallossSpiewakPhotographywillnotflyinwindsexceeding16knotsor10milesperhour.BuiltinsafetysystemsincludeaGPSmodethatallowstheUAStohoverinplacewhenradiocontrolinputsarereleased.Withthreemodestochoosefrom,SpiewakPhotographyutilizestheSmartMode1foraerialvideography/photography.Thisisthesafest,mostreliableandstablemodetopreventaccidentandhazard.WhenpilotcommunicationislosttheUASisdesignedtoslowlydescendtothepointoftakeoff.Inadditiontotheremotecontrolpilot,SpiewakPhotographyusesaspotter,suchthat,ataminimum,two(2)personnelgovernthesafeflightoftheSpiewakPhotographyUAS.SpiewakPhotographydoesnotoperateit'sUASnearairports,hospitals,policeheliports,oranyareaswherethegeneralpubliciswithinfiftytoonehundred(50-100)yardsdependingonlocation,conditions,andweather.TheUASoperatingsoftwareandGPSnavigationsystemsdonotallowSpiewakPhotography'sUAStooperatenearairportsorrestrictedflyzones.ThefailsafesoftwarewilldisabletheUASfromtakingoffandalsolimittheUASsystemsfromoperatingwithinspecificGPSpresetno-flyzones.JasonSpiewakisconstantlyonalertforanymannedaircraft(police,medical,helicopters,etc.)andpreparedtoland/abortimmediatelytothenearestandsafestgroundpointshouldamannedaircraftapproachthelocationorJasonSpiewakbelievesmannedaircraftmayapproachnearthelocation.TheUASiscapableofverticalandhorizontaloperations,andareflownonlywithinlineofsight, astheremotecontrolpilot.Utilizingbatterpowerratherthancombustiblefuels,flightsgenerallylastbetweeneighteen(18)andtwenty(20)minutes,withanaltitudeunderonehundredandfifty(150)feet.JasonSpiewakd/b/aSpiewakPhotography,utilizesafreshfullychargedbatterywitheachflightasasafetyprecaution;fullflighttimelimitforeachbatteryiseighteen(18)totwenty(20)minutesastested.SpiewakPhotographywillnotoperatetheUASatorbelowmanufacturerrecommendedminimumchargelevelsforoperation,preferringtoremainwellwithinasafeoperatingrangetoinsureadequatecommunicationbetweenradiocontrolandUAStoeliminatepotentialforcrash,lossofcontrolorhazard.Reservebatteriesareathandwitheachexercisetoinsurereplacementforsufficientsafelevelofoperation.SpiewakPhotographyisriskaverseanddoesnotbelieveintakingrisksthatmaycauseacrashthatcouldcreatehazardtothepublic/property/mannedaircraft.SpiewakPhotographyhasclockedover200+hoursofhobbylevelflightsforfuturecommercialusetogainfamiliarizationwiththecharacteristicsofthisspecificUAS'sperformanceunderdifferenttemperatureandweatherconditions.JasonSpiewakalsopracticesusingcomputerizedsimulatedflightstomaintainadequateskillsandresponsereflextime.SpiewakPhotographyisextremelycautiouswhenoperatingitsUAS/ultralightweightunmannedaircraftandwillnot"createahazardtousersofthenationalairspacesystemorthepublic."112P.L.95§333(b).GiventhesmallsizeandweightoftheUASitfallswellwithinCongress'scontemplatedsafetyzonewhenitpromulgatedtheReformActandthecorrespondingdirectivetointegrateUAS'sintothenationalairspacesystem.TheUAS,usedinhobbyflight,hasademonstrablesafetyrecordanddoesnotposeanythreattothegeneralpublicornationalsecurity.1SmartModeincludesGPSGeofenceradiusforoperation,positionhold,selfleveling,altitudecommand,returnhomefeatureorlandintheeventofcommunicationinterruptionbetweenRCtransmitterandUAS.SeeAppendixAHowSpiewakPhotography'sRequestWillBenefittheGeneralPublicGrantingSpiewakPhotography'sexemptionrequestfurthersthepublicinterest.Aerialphotographyandvideographyforrealestateandpersonalpropertymarketinghas beenaroundforalongtimethroughmannedfixedwingaircraftandhelicopters.However,forsmallbudgetrealestatecompanies,averagehomeowners,andsmallvideographycompaniestheexpenseofsuchaerialvideographyiscostprohibitive.Onlylargecompaniesandhighendrealtorsorluxuryhomeownerscanaffordtoabsorbsuchexpenses.Accordingly,themajorityofhomeownersandrealtorsaredeprivedfromavaluablemarketingtool.Mannedaircraftposeathreattothepublicthroughpotentialcatastrophiccrashesthatthecommunityhasexperiencedinthepastwithmilitary,medicalandnews/tourismhelicoptercrasheswithinthecityofMiami,resultinginlossoflife,andwithcombustiblefuelthatexplodedandburnedonimpact.TheUASoperatedbySpiewakPhotographyposesnosuchthreatbecausethesizeandlackofcombustiblefuelalleviatesanypotentialthreattothepublic.Congresshasalreadyproclaimedthatitisinthepublic'sinteresttointegratecommerciallyflownUAS'sintothenationalairspacesystem,hencethepassingoftheReformAct.GrantingtheexemptionrequestofJasonSpiewakd/b/aSpiewakPhotographyfurthersthepublicinterestthroughvisualawarenessofthegeographicalbenefitsinandaroundtheSouthFloridaareaandpromotessmallbusinessgrowthandcompetitivenessinthearea.Itwillprovideadditionaljobsrelatedtophotography,videography,andcinematographyeditingandshooting.TheultralightweightUASisbatterypoweredandcreatesnoemissionsthatcanharmtheenvironment.TheconsequenceoftheultralightweightUAScrashingisfarlessthanafullsizehelicopterorfixedwingaircraft;whichareheavy,containcombustiblefuelandcancausecatastrophicdevastationtothepublic.Thepublic'sinterestisfurtheredbyminimizingecologicalandcrashthreatsbypermittingaerialvideo/photocapturethroughabatteryoperatedultralightweightUAS.PermittingJasonSpiewakd/b/aSpiewakPhotographytoimmediatelyflywithinnationalairspacefurtherseconomicgrowth.GrantingmyexemptionrequestsubstantiallyfurtherstheeconomicimpactfortheSouthFloridacommunityforcompanieslookingtorelocateorbuildintheSouthFloridaareaaswellasindividualslookingtorelocateforcareeradvancement.Grantingtheexemptionservesasastimulustothecommunity.ReasonsWhyJasonSpiewakd/b/aSpiewakPhotography'sExemptionWillNotAdverselyEffectSafetyandHowtheExemptionWillProvideaLevelofSafetyatLeastEqualtotheExistingRule:TheexemptionforJasonSpiewakd/b/aSpiewakPhotographywillnotadverselyaffectsafety.Quitethecontrary,forthereasonsstatedJasonSpiewakwillbeallowedtologmoreflighttimeinFAAcontrolledairspace,withcommunicationwiththeFAA,allowingJasonSpiewaktocontributetotheinnovationandimplementationofnewandnovel,asofyetundiscoveredsafetyprotocolsforUASpilotsthatcanbeembracedfordevelopmentincooperatingwiththeFAA.Inaddition,JasonSpiewaksubmitsthefollowingrepresentationsofenhancementstocurrentaerialvideographyandphotography:•SpiewakPhotography'sUASweighslessthan10poundscompletewithasmallultralightweighthighdefinitioncamera;•SpiewakPhotography'sUASisoperatedbelow300feet(wellwithinthe400ft.permissibleceilingsetbytheFAAModernizationandReformActof2012);•SpiewakPhotography'sUASisonlyoperatedfor18-20minutesperflight;•SpiewakPhotography'sUASislandedpriortomanufacturerrecommendedminimumlevelofbatterypower;•SpiewakPhotography'sUASispilotedthroughremotecontrolbylineofsight;•SpiewakPhotography'sremotecontrolpilotshavevideobackupshouldtheysomehowlosesightoftheUAS;•SpiewakPhotography'sUAShasaGPSandflightsafetyfeaturewherebyithoversandthenslowlylandsifcommunicationwiththeremotecontrolpilotislost;•SpiewakPhotography'sflightdataisactivelyanalyzedtoconstantlyupdateandenhancesafetyprotocols;•SpiewakPhotography'sUASisoperatedonlyinareasonablysafeenvironmentthatisstrictlycontrolledandawayfrompowerlines,elevatedlights,airports,andactivelypopulatedareas;•SpiewakPhotographyperformsextensivepre-flightinspectionsandprotocolsareconducted;•SpiewakPhotographyobtainspermissionpriortooperating•SpiewakPhotographyhasproceduresinplacetoabortflightsintheeventofsafetybreachesorpotentialdangerThesafetyprotocolsimplementedbyJasonSpiewakd/b/aSpiewakPhotographyprovidealevelofsafetyequaltoorexceedingexistingrules.ItisimportanttonotethatabsenttheintegrationofcommercialUASintoournationalairspacesystem,helicoptersaretheprimarymeansofaerialvideoandphotographyforcommunityawarenessandmarketingofrealestateandpersonalproperty.Whilethesafetyrecordofsuchhelicoptersisremarkablyastounding,therehasbeenlocalincidentinvolvinglossoflifeaswellasextensivepropertydamage;itisfarsafertooperateabatterypoweredultralightweightUAS.First,thepotentiallossoflifeisdiminishedbecauseUAS'scarrynopeopleonboardandonlyoperateinspecificareasawayfrommasspopulations.Second,thereisnofuelonboardaUASandthusthepotentialforfireorexplosionsisgreatlydiminished.Third,thesmallsizeandextrememaneuverabilityoftheUASallowsthepilottoremotelyavoidhazardsquicklyandsafely.Finally,givenitssmallsizeandweight,evenwhencloseenoughtocaptureamazingimages,theUASneednotbesoclosetotheobjectstheyarefocusedonthroughthetechnologyanduseofposteditingsoftwareallowingpanandzoom.Accordingly,JasonSpiewakhasoperatedtheUASexperimentallyforfamiliarization/competencyandwillcontinuetooperateatandabovecurrentsafetylevels.ASummarytheFAAMayPublishintheFederalRegister:A.14C.F.R.21&14C.F.R.91:AirworthinessCertificates,ManualsandtheLike14C.F.R.21,subpartH,entitledAirworthinessCertificates,setsforthrequirementsforprocurementofnecessaryairworthinesscertificatesinrelationtoFAR§91.203(a)(1).Thesize,weight,andenclosedoperationalareaofSpiewakPhotography'sUASpermitsexemptionfromPart21becausetheUASmeets(andexceeds)anequivalentlevelofsafetypursuanttoSection333oftheReformActTheFAAisauthorizedtoexemptaircraftfromtheairworthinesscertificaterequirementunderboththeAct(49U.S.C.§44701(f))andSection333oftheReformActBothpiecesoflegislationpermittheFAAtoexemptUAS'sfromtheairworthinesscertificaterequirementinconsiderationoftheweight,size,speed,maneuverabilityandproximitytoareassuchasairportsanddensepopulations.SpiewakPhotography'scurrentand projectedUASs'meetandexceedeachoftheelements.14C.F.R.91.7(a)prohibitstheoperationofanaircraftwithoutan airworthinesscertificate.AsnosuchcertificatewillbeapplicableintheformcontemplatedbytheFARs,thisregulationisinapplicable.14C.F.R.91.9(b)(2)requiresanaircraftflightmanualintheaircraftAstherearenoon-boardpilotsorpassengers,andgiventhesizeoftheUAS,thisregulationisinapplicable.Anequivalentlevelofsafetywillbeachievedbymaintainingasafety/flightmanualdelineatingareasofwheresafetycanbedefined.2TheFAAhaspreviouslyissuedexemptionstothisregulationinExemptionNos.8607,8737,8738,9299,9299A,9565,9565B,10167,10167A,10602,10700and32827.14C.F.R.91.121regardingaltimetersettingsinapplicableinsofarastheUASutilizeselectronicglobalpositionssystemswithbarometricsensor.14C.F.R.91.203(a)and(b)providesforthecarryingofcivilaircraftcertificationsandregistrations.Theyareinapplicableforthesamereasonsdescribedabove.TheequivalentlevelofsafetywillbeachievedbymaintaininganysuchrequiredcertificationsandregistrationsbySpiewakPhotography.B.14C.F.R.§45.23:MarkingtheAircraft2Appendix_-Safety/FlightManualApplicable

codes

of federal regulation

require

aircraft

to

be marked according

to certain specifications.

The

UAS operated

by Spiewak Photography

is,

by definition, unmanned.

The

UAS

does

not have

a cabin, cockpit

or pilot station

on which

to mark certain

words

or phrases.

Further, two-inch

letters

is difficult

to place

on such

small aircraft

with dimensions

smaller

than

the minimal

lettering requirement Regardless,

Spiewak Photography

will mark

its UASs

in the largest possible

lettering by placing

the word "EXPERIMENTAL"

on

its fuselage

as required

by

14 C.F.R. §45.29(f)

so that

the pilot,

or anyone assisting

the pilot

as

a spotter

with

the UAV will

see

the markings.

The

FAA previously

issued exemptions

to this regulation through Exemptions

Nos. 8738, 10167, 10167A,

and 10700. C.

14 C.F.R.

§ 61.113:

Private

Pilot Privileges

and Limitations:

PIC Pursuant

to

14 C.F.R.

§§ 61.113(a)

& (b), private

pilots

are limited

to noncommercial

operations.

Jason Spiewak

d/b/a Spiewak Photography

can achieve

an equivalent

level

of safety

as achieved

by current regulations

because

its UAS

does not carry

any pilots

or passengers.

Further,

while helpful,

a pilot license

will

not ensure

remote

control piloting

skills.

The risks related

to the operation

of the UAS

is far less than

the risk levels inherent

in the commercial

activities

outlined

in

14 C.F.R. § 61,

et seq. Thus, allowing

Spiewak Photography

to operate

its UAS

to meet

and exceed current

safety

levels

in relation

to

14 C.F.R.

§§ 61.113(a)

& (b). D.

14 C.F.R.

§ 91.119: Minimum

Safe Altitudes. 14 C.F.R.

§ 91.119 prescribes

safe altitudes

for

the operation

of civil aircraft.

It allows helicopters

to

be operated

at lower altitudes

in certain conditions.

The

UAS will never operate

at

an altitude

greater

than

300 AGL; safely

below

the standard

of 400

AGL. Spiewak Photography

will however,

operate

its UAS

in safe areas

away from public

and traffic, providing

a level

of safety

at least equivalent

to

or below those

in relation

to minimum

safe altitudes.

Given

the size, weight, maneuverability and speed

of

its UAS,

an equivalent

or higher

level

of safety

will

be achieved. E.

14 C.F.R.

§ 91.405(a),

407(a)(1),

409(a)(2),

417(a)

& (b): Maintenance Inspections The above-cited

regulations

require,

amongst

other things,

aircraft

owners

and operators

to "have aircraft inspected

as prescribed

in subpart

E of this part

and shall between

required inspection,

except

as provided

in paragraph

(c)

of this section, have discrepancies

repaired

as prescribed

in part

43

of this chapter

....

" These regulations

only

apply

to aircraft

with

an airworthiness

certificate. Therefore,

they

will

not apply

to Spiewak Photography's

UAS. However,

as

a safety precaution

Spiewak Photography

inspects

its UAS before

and after

each flight A summary

the FAA

May Publish

in the Federal Register:

14 C.F.R.

21 and

14 C.F.R. 91: Airworthiness

Certificates,

Manuals

and

the

Like.

14 C.F.R.

21, subpart

H,entitledAirworthinessCertificates,setsforthrequirementforprocurementofnecessaryairworthinesscertificatesinrelationtoFAR§91.203(a)(1).Thesize,weight,andenclosedoperationsofitsUASpermitsexemptionfromPart21,becauseSpiewakPhotography'sUASmeetsanequivalentlevelofsafetypursuanttoSection333oftheReformActTheFAAisauthorizedtoexemptaircraftfromtheairworthinesscertificaterequirementunderboththeAct(49U.S.C.§44701(t))andSection333oftheReformAct.BothpiecesoflegislationpermittheFAAtoexemptUAS'sfromtheairworthinesscertificaterequirementinconsiderationofweight,size,speed,maneuverabilityandproximitytoareassuchasairportsanddensepopulations.SpiewakPhotography'sUASmeetsorexceedseachoftheseelements.14C.F.R.§91.7(a)prohibitstheoperationofaircraftwithoutanairworthinesscertificate.AsnosuchcertificatewillbeapplicableintheformcontemplatedbytheFARs,thisregulationisinapplicable.14C.F.R.§91.9(b)(2)requiresanaircraftflightmanualintheaircraft.Astherearenopilotsorpassengers,andgiventhesizeoftheUAS,thisregulationisinapplicable.Anequivalentlevelofsafetywillbeachievedbymaintainingamanual.TheFAAhaspreviouslyissuedexemptionstothisregulationinExemptionNos.8607,8737,8738,9299,9299A,9565,9565B,10167,maintenanceprogramthatinvolvesregularsoftwareupdatesandcurativemeasuresforanydamagedhardware.Therefore,anequivalentlevelofsafetywillbeachieved.Insummary,JasonSpiewakd/b/aSpiewakPhotographyseeksanexemptionfromthefollowingregulations:14C.F.R.21,subpartH;14C.F.R.45.23(b);14C.F.R.61.113(a)&(b);14C.F.R.91.7(a);14C.F.R.91.9(b)(2);14C.F.R.91.103(b);14C.F.R.91.109;14C.F.R.91.119;14C.F.R.91.121;14C.F.R.91.151(a);14C.F.R.91.203(a)&(b);14C.F.R.91.405(a);14C.F.R.91.407(a)(1);14C.F.R.91.409(a)(2);14C.F.R.91.417(a)&(b)tocommerciallyoperateitssmallunmannedvehicle/lightweightunmannedaircraftvehicletopromotecommunityawarenessanddevelopeconomicplatformsandmarketingmediaforrealestateandpersonalpropertyownersandsalesagents.ItwillenhancetheSouthFloridaeconomyandtheexperienceofthoseseekingtorelocatetoSouthFlorida.Currently,aerialvideography/photographyreliesprimarilyontheuseoflargeraircraftrunningoncombustiblefuelwhichposespotentialrisktothepublic.GrantingSpiewakPhotography'srequestforexemptionwillreducecurrentrisklevelsandtherebyenhancesafety.SpiewakPhotography'sUASdoesnotcontainorusepotentiallyexplosivefuel,issmaller,lighter,andmoremaneuverablethanconventionalvideoandphotographicaircraftwithmuchlessflighttime.Further,SpiewakPhotographyoperatesatloweraltitudesandincontrolledairspaceeliminatingpotentialpublicriskflyingtoandfromestablishedairfields.SpiewakPhotographyhasbeeninformallyanalyzingflightinformationandhascompiledsafetyprotocolsandimplementedaflightoperationsmanualforUASusagethatexceedscurrentlyacceptedmeansandmethodsforsafeflight.FormalcollectionofinformationsharedwiththeFAAwillenhancetheFAA'sinternaleffortstoestablishprotocolsforcomplyingwiththeFAAModernizationandReformActof2012.TherearenopersonnelonboardtheUASdiminishingthelikelihood

of death

or serious

bodily

injury. Operation

of the UAS, weighing

less than

10 pounds

and travelling

at lower speeds

within

limited

areas

will provide

an equivalent

level

of safety

as that achieved

under current

FARs. Accordingly,

Jason Spiewak

d/b/a Spiewak Photography,

respectfully

requests

that

the

FAA grant

its exemption

request

and agrees

to cooperate

in sharing information

to benefit

the FAA, safety

of

m

ned aircraft,

and

the general

public

at large.