alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 10.01**
June 9, 2003
Mr. Jim Bazlen4421 East Horseshoe DrivePhoenix, Arizona 85028
Dear Jim:
     This letter shall serve to amend, effective as ofJune 11, 2003 *(“Effective Date”)*, theterms and conditions of your employment relationship pursuant tothat certain letter agreement dated March 30, 2000 betweenyou and CSK Auto, Inc. (the *“Agreement”*):
     1.     As of theEffective Date, your annual base salary shall be modified tofifty thousand dollars ($50,000.00), to be paid on a bi-weeklybasis.
     2.     In addition, youshall receive in connection with your membership on the Board ofDirectors a fee of $1,500.00 plus reasonable expenses forphysical attendance at each Board meeting (regular or special)and each committee meeting that requires a separate trip (i.e.,if the committee meeting does not occur in connection with aBoard of Directors meeting). For each Board of Directors orcommittee meeting (regular or special) attended telephonically,you shall be paid a fee of $500.00. Such meeting fees andexpenses shall be reimbursed at the end of each fiscal quarter.
     3.     Except asexpressly modified and amended herein, the terms and conditionsof the Agreement shall continue in full force and effect;provided, however, that in the event of any conflict in theprovisions of the Agreement and the provisions of this letter,the provisions of this letter shall govern and control.
     If the foregoing is acceptable, pleaseacknowledge your agreement to the terms and conditions set forthabove by signing and dating below.
 Very truly yours,      Maynard L. Jenkins     *Chairman and Chief Executive Officer*  Acknowledged and Accepted     this                     day    of June, 2003    
  Jim Bazlen
# C_2017293EN.01003001.xml

| 4.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 293/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.9.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 293/30

---

Judgment of the General Court of 20 July 2017 — Belgium v Commission

(Case T-287/16) (1)

1

((EAGF and EAFRD - Expenditure excluded from financing - Expenditure incurred by Belgium - Export refunds - No recovery resulting from negligence attributable to a body of a Member State - Non-exhaustion of all possible remedies - Proportionality))

(2017/C 293/34)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Kingdom of Belgium (represented by: initially J.-C. Halleux and M. Jacobs, then M. Jacobs, L. Van den Broeck and J. Van Holm, acting as Agents, and by É. Grégoire and J. Mariani, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Bouquet and P. Ondrůšek, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU and seeking annulment of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/417 of 17 March 2016 excluding from European Union financing certain expenditure incurred by the Member States under the European Agricultural Guarantee Fund (EAGF) and under the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) (OJ 2016 L 75, p. 16), in so far as it excludes from that financing in relation to the Kingdom of Belgium the amount of EUR 9 601 619,00.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1)

Dismisses the action;

| 2) | Orders the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2)

Orders the Kingdom of Belgium to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 270, 25.7.2016.

1

---
#### FARMERS AND MERCHANTS BANK OF HUNTSVILLE, MISSOURI, a Missouri banking corporation, Appellant, v. ST. PAUL SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, Appellee.

No. 83-2245.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Submitted May 18, 1984.

Decided June 29, 1984.

Cynthia A. Suter, Rex V. Gump, Hulen, Hulen, Tatlow & Gump, Moberly, Mo., for appellant.

Daniel T. Rabbitt, Brown, James & Rabbitt, P.C., St. Louis, Mo., for appellee.

Before ROSS, McMILLIAN, and ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Farmers and Merchants Bank appeals from the trial court’s judgment that the bank was not entitled to recover under an insurance policy issued by St. Paul Surplus Lines. Farmers and Merchants Bank held a mortgage on certain real property and improvements owned by LeRoy, Jane and John Gillan. On March 3,1981, John Gillan intentionally started a fire which completely destroyed the building mortgaged to Farmers and Merchants Bank.

The premises were insured by St. Paul Surplus Lines, but Farmers and Merchants Bank was not named in the policy at the time of the loss. St. Paul Surplus Lines refused to cover the loss and Farmers and Merchants Bank sued, presenting several theories of recovery to the court.

We have carefully studied the record, including the magistrate’s opinion and the briefs of the parties to this appeal. We find no merit in the appellant’s arguments and accordingly affirm pursuant to Rule 14 of the Rules of this court.
Electronically Filed

Intermediate Court of Appeals

CAAP-12-0000814

28-MAY-2014

08:23 AM
Case 2:04-mc-00011-CMR Document 1 Filed 01/13/04 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:04-cv-05504-GEKP Document 262 Filed 05/04/07 Page 1 of 26
Case 2:04-cv-05504-GEKP Document 262 Filed 05/04/07 Page 2 of 26
Case 2:04-cv-05504-GEKP Document 262 Filed 05/04/07 Page 3 of 26
Case 2:04-cv-05504-GEKP Document 262 Filed 05/04/07 Page 4 of 26
Case 2:04-cv-05504-GEKP Document 262 Filed 05/04/07 Page 5 of 26
Case 2:04-cv-05504-GEKP Document 262 Filed 05/04/07 Page 6 of 26
Case 2:04-cv-05504-GEKP Document 262 Filed 05/04/07 Page 7 of 26
Case 2:04-cv-05504-GEKP Document 262 Filed 05/04/07 Page 8 of 26
Case 2:04-cv-05504-GEKP Document 262 Filed 05/04/07 Page 9 of 26
Case 2:04-cv-05504-GEKP Document 262 Filed 05/04/07 Page 10 of 26
Case 2:04-cv-05504-GEKP Document 262 Filed 05/04/07 Page 11 of 26
Case 2:04-cv-05504-GEKP Document 262 Filed 05/04/07 Page 12 of 26
Case 2:04-cv-05504-GEKP Document 262 Filed 05/04/07 Page 13 of 26
Case 2:04-cv-05504-GEKP Document 262 Filed 05/04/07 Page 14 of 26
Case 2:04-cv-05504-GEKP Document 262 Filed 05/04/07 Page 15 of 26
Case 2:04-cv-05504-GEKP Document 262 Filed 05/04/07 Page 16 of 26
Case 2:04-cv-05504-GEKP Document 262 Filed 05/04/07 Page 17 of 26
Case 2:04-cv-05504-GEKP Document 262 Filed 05/04/07 Page 18 of 26
Case 2:04-cv-05504-GEKP Document 262 Filed 05/04/07 Page 19 of 26
Case 2:04-cv-05504-GEKP Document 262 Filed 05/04/07 Page 20 of 26
Case 2:04-cv-05504-GEKP Document 262 Filed 05/04/07 Page 21 of 26
Case 2:04-cv-05504-GEKP Document 262 Filed 05/04/07 Page 22 of 26
Case 2:04-cv-05504-GEKP Document 262 Filed 05/04/07 Page 23 of 26
Case 2:04-cv-05504-GEKP Document 262 Filed 05/04/07 Page 24 of 26
Case 2:04-cv-05504-GEKP Document 262 Filed 05/04/07 Page 25 of 26
Case 2:04-cv-05504-GEKP Document 262 Filed 05/04/07 Page 26 of 26
# C_2018112EN.01000401.xml

| 26.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 1 February 2018 — Deutsche Bahn AG, Schenker AG, Schenker China Ltd, Schenker International (H.K.) Ltd v European Commission

(Case C-264/16 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Article 101 TFEU - Price fixing - International air freight forwarding services - Pricing agreement affecting the final price of the services))

(2018/C 112/05)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellants: Deutsche Bahn AG, Schenker AG, Schenker China Ltd, Schenker International (H.K.) Ltd (represented by: F. Montag and M. Eisenbarth, Rechtsanwälte, and F. Hoseinian, advokat)

Appellants:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: A. Dawes, H. Leupold and G. Meessen, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Deutsche Bahn AG, Schenker AG, Schenker China Ltd and Schenker International (H.K.) Ltd to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Deutsche Bahn AG, Schenker AG, Schenker China Ltd and Schenker International (H.K.) Ltd to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 243, 4.7.2016.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Duke Capital LLC (Duke Capital) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David L. Hauser, President of Duke Capital, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Duke Capital.



|                        |  |                    
|----------------------- |  | -------------------
|Date: November 15, 2004 |  | /s/ David L. Hauser
|                        |  | David L. Hauser    
|                        |  | President          



66
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           4,385
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,004
<ALLOWANCES>                                       471
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 9,371
<PP&E>                                         165,905
<DEPRECIATION>                                  45,273
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 135,301
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,170
<BONDS>                                        130,033
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (22,620)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   135,301
<SALES>                                         18,233
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,522
<CGS>                                            7,910
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   15,666
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    12
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,570
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (4,714)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,791)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,923)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,923)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.07)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.07)


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1238 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1238

    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase and make 
permanent the exclusion for benefits provided to volunteer firefighters 
                   and emergency medical responders.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2017

Ms. Collins (for herself, Mr. Cardin, Mr. Schumer, Mr. Blumenthal, Ms. 
Klobuchar, Mr. Rounds, and Mr. Merkley) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase and make 
permanent the exclusion for benefits provided to volunteer firefighters 
                   and emergency medical responders.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Volunteer Responder Incentive 
Protection Act of 2017''.

SEC. 2. BENEFITS PROVIDED TO VOLUNTEER FIREFIGHTERS AND EMERGENCY 
              MEDICAL RESPONDERS.

    (a) Increase in Dollar Limitation on Qualified Payments.--
Subparagraph (B) of section 139B(c)(2) of the Internal Revenue Code of 
1986 is amended by striking ``$30'' and inserting ``$50''.
    (b) Reimplementing and Making Permanent Benefits.--Section 139B of 
the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking subsection 
(d).
    (c) Effective Date.--The amendments made by this section shall 
apply to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017.
                                 <all>
```
##### 



Exhibit 31.1
 WESTERN RESERVE BANCORP, INC.
FORM 10-QSB
Quarter ended June 30, 2007
 CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Western Reserve Bancorp, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;4.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e) for the small business issuer and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
the period in which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most
recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers
auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over
financial reporting.
 Date:  August 14, 2007
    /s/ Edward J. McKeonEdward J. McKeon, President and CEO
# Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

Nove mber 17, 2021

No. 04

- 21

- 00430

- CV

TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION and James M. Bass, Appellants

v.

ROBERT DIXON TIPS PROPERTIES, LLC,

Appellee

From the 285th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2018CI10003

Honorable Tina Tor res , Judge Presiding



### O R D E R

Appellants’ brief was originally due November 8, 2021. On November 5, 2021, appellants filed a “First Motion for an Extension of Time to File Appellants’ Brief,” which requested an extension of appellants’ brie fing deadline until December 8, 2021. On November 9, 2021, appellants filed an “Amended First Motion for an Extension of Time to File Appellants’ Brief.” The two motions differ only in their certificates of conference; like the original motion, the only re lief requested in the amended motion was an extension of appellants’ briefing deadline
until December 8, 2021.

By order issued November 9, 2021, this court granted appellants’ “First Motion for an Extension of Time to File Appellants’ Brief” and extended appellants’ briefing deadline until December 8, 2021. Accordingly, appellants’ “Amended First Motion for an Extension of Time to File Appellants’ Brief” is DENIED AS MOOT

.

_________________________________ Beth Watkins , Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixe d the seal of the said

court on this 17th day of November, 2021

.___________________________________ MICHAEL A. CRUZ

, Clerk of Court
# C_2017277EN.01004101.xml

| 21.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 277/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 277/41

---

Judgment of the General Court of 7 July 2017 — Axel Springer v EUIPO — Stiftung Warentest (TestBild)

(Case T-359/16) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for an EU word mark TestBild - Earlier national figurative marks test - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the goods and services - Similarity of the signs - Inherent distinctive character - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2017/C 277/60)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Axel Springer SE (Berlin, Germany) (represented by: K. Hamacher and G. Müllejans, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Stiftung Warentest (Berlin) (represented: initially by R. Mann, J. Smid, T. Brach, H. Nieland and A.-K. Kornrumpf and subsequently by J. Smid, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 May 2016 (Case R 555/2015-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Stiftung Warentest and Axel Springer.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 4 May 2016 (Case R 555/2015-4), in so far as it found that there was a likelihood of confusion in respect of ‘printed matter, in particular test periodicals, consumer information, prospectuses, catalogues, books, newspapers and periodicals; instructional and teaching material (except apparatus)’, in Class 16 of the Nice Agreement of 15 June 1957 concerning the International Classification of Goods and Services for the purposes of the Registration of Marks, as revised and amended; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 4 May 2016 (Case R 555/2015-4), in so far as it found that there was a likelihood of confusion in respect of ‘printed matter, in particular test periodicals, consumer information, prospectuses, catalogues, books, newspapers and periodicals; instructional and teaching material (except apparatus)’, in Class 16 of the Nice Agreement of 15 June 1957 concerning the International Classification of Goods and Services for the purposes of the Registration of Marks, as revised and amended;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 296, 16.8.2016.

1

---
Document

Exhibit 10.29.2


September 25, 2020




Mr. Kenny Cheung






Dear Kenny:






I am pleased to confirm your promotion and increase to your compensation package with your new position of Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, based out of Estero, Florida. Your new salary will be increased to the annualized amount of $600,000, paid bi-weekly and is effective September 28, 2020. You will continue reporting directly to me.


After emergence from bankruptcy you will continue to be eligible for an award under the Hertz Executive Incentive Compensation Plan at a target of 80% of your base salary. The actual award is based on individual performance and the Corporation meeting certain objectives.


Upon emergence from bankruptcy you will be eligible to participate in the annual equity award program at the level determined by the Compensation Committee.


Your compensation package will be reviewed again in March 2021 during the March Compensation Committee meeting, the annual meeting where executive compensation is reviewed and established for the following year.


Kenny, we believe that you will continue to make an outstanding contribution to the Hertz organization.


Very truly yours,


/s/ Paul Stone
Paul Stone
President and Chief Executive Officer




I accept the terms and conditions of this offer:


									
	/s/ Kenny Cheung		September 25, 2020
	Kenny Cheung		Date
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 02-6020

THOMAS RUSSELL EVANS, Petitioner - Appellant, versus RONALD J. ANGELONE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (CA-01-638-2) Submitted: May 16, 2002 Decided: May 23, 2002 Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Thomas Russell Evans, Appellant Pro Se. Leah Ann Darron, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Thomas Russell Evans seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp. 2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Evans v. Angelone , No. CA-01- 638-2 (E.D. Va. Nov. 28, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
No. 51315.

#### Protests 118901-K, etc., of W. Stuart Smith et al. (Cleveland, etc.).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.