alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Integrated Healthcare Holdings,
Inc. (the  "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the undersigned,  in
the capacity and on the dates indicated below,  hereby certifies  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      1.    the Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company at the dates and for the period indicated.

      This  Certificate has not been, and shall not be deemed,  "filed" with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.


Dated: August 15, 2005                 By:  /s/ Bruce Mogel
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Bruce Mogel
                                       Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 99.9

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Enerplus Corporation (the "Corporation") on Form 40-F for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gordon J. Kerr, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Corporation, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

/s/ GORDON J. KERR Gordon J. Kerr
President and Chief Executive Officer
of Enerplus Corporation


March 11,
2011

The foregoing certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that
section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically
incorporates it by reference.

---



QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 220 (Thursday, November 16, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 78816]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-25285]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS


VA National Academic Affiliations Council, Notice of Meeting

    The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) gives notice under the 
Federal Advisory Committee Act, 5 U.S.C. Ch. 10, that the VA National 
Academic Affiliations Council will meet via conference call on December 
11, 2023, from 1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m. EST. The meeting is open to the 
public.
    The purpose of the Council is to advise the Secretary on matters 
affecting partnerships between VA and its academic affiliates.
    On December 11, 2023, the Council will receive project updates and 
have discussions on actions affecting the educational mission of VA. 
The Council will receive public comments from 2:25 p.m. to 2:55 p.m. 
EST.
    Interested persons may attend and/or present oral statements to the 
Council.
    The dial in number to attend the conference call is: 669-254-5252. 
At the prompt, enter meeting ID 161 511 8883, then press #. The meeting 
passcode is 079818 then press #. Individuals seeking to present oral 
statements are invited to submit a 1-2-page summary of their comments 
at the time of the meeting for inclusion in the official meeting 
record. Oral presentations will be limited to five minutes or less, 
depending on the number of participants. Interested parties may also 
provide written comments for review by the Council prior to the meeting 
or at any time, by email to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#f698939a9a9f93d89b9f82959e939a9ab68097d8919980"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="8ce2e9e0e0e5e9a2e1e5f8efe4e9e0e0ccfaeda2ebe3fa">[email protected]</span></a>, or by mail to 
Nellie Mitchell, MS, RHIA, Designated Federal Officer, Office of 
Academic Affiliations (14AA), 810 Vermont Avenue NW, Washington, DC 
20420. Any member of the public wishing to participate or seeking 
additional information should contact Ms. Mitchell via email or by 
phone at (608) 358-9902.

    Dated: November 9, 2023.
Jelessa M. Burney,
Federal Advisory Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2023-25285 Filed 11-15-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8320-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 51612.

#### Protests 998074-G, etc., of Chong Lung et al. (New York).

*171Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of kumquats similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Fung Chong Co.*(34 C. C. P. A. 40, C. A. D. 342). In accordance therewith the claim at 1 cent per pound under paragraph 743 was sustained.
<PAGE>



                                                                  EXHIBIT 32 (b)


     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northland Cable Television, Inc. and
Subsidiary (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2004
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Form 10-Q"), I, Gary Jones, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that;


          (1)  The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
               (a) or (15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
               78m or 78(d)); and

          (2)  The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company.


DATE: 11-12-04


/s/ GARY S. JONES
    -------------
    Gary S. Jones
    President
    (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


A signed original of this written statement will be retained by Northland Cable
Television, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**Certification Pursuant to**

**18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

**As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AXT, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Morris S. Young, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), that, to the best of myknowledge:

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated:  August 10, 2009 | By:    | /s/ MORRIS S. YOUNG                                                     |
|------------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                         |   | Morris S. Young*Chief Executive Officer  (Principal Executive Officer)* |

 

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

AMY DiMARTINO : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. :

:

ACME MARKETS, INC. and : NO. 02-4320

ALBERTSON’S INC. :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 7th day of January, 2003, it having been reported that the issues

between the parties in the above action have been settled and upon Order of the Court

pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1(b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure, it is

ORDERED that the above action is DISMISSED with prejudice, pursuant to agreement of

counsel without costs.

________________________________

TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE, J. 

Case 2:02-cv-04320-TJS Document 15 Filed 01/08/2003 Page 1 of 1
**Good Neighbor Environmental Board** 

### Agenda **Tuesday ,**  **April 2, 201**  **3 12pm**  **– 4pm**  12:00 (EST) **Welcome and Introductions**

 Mark Joyce **,** Associate Director GNEB Act ing Designated Federal Officer  Cynthia Jones -Jackson, Acting Director U.S. EPA Office of Federal Advisory Committee Management and Outreach  Diane Austin, Chair Good Neighbor Environmental Board  Board Member s 12: 3 0 – 12: 4 0 **Overview of Agenda**

 Diane Austin, Chair Good Neighbor Environmental Board 12:40 – 1:40 **Discussion of Meetings,**  **Report Process a**  **nd Timeline**

 Budget  Upcoming meetings  Reports 1: 4 0 – 3:50 **Discussion on Report**

 Topic  Moving forward 3 : 5 0 – 4:00 **Public Comments** 4 :00 **Adjourn**
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 99-40195

Conference Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

MARTIN BAEZA-MARTINEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. B-98-CR-517-1

--------------------

August 27, 1999

Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender (“FPD”), on behalf of Martin

Baeza-Martinez (“Baeza”), challenges Baeza’s guilty-plea

conviction for illegal reentry of a deported alien, 8 U.S.C. 

§ 1326. The FPD contends that the district court erred by

failing to comply with Fed. R. Crim. P. 11(c)(1) during

rearraignment and that the failure requires that his conviction

be reversed.
No. 99-40195

-2-

The Government responds that the FPD has waived the argument

by failing to raise it before the district court or in any

similar case. As the Government concedes, however, claims of

Rule 11 violations may raised for the first time on appeal. See

United States v. Suarez, 155 F.3d 521, 524 (5th Cir. 1998)(Rule

11 challenge may be raised for the first time on appeal and is

reviewed for harmless error); United States v. Reyna, 130 F.3d

104, 107 & n.2 (5th Cir. 1997)(although the defendant did not

present his claim of noncompliance with Rule 11 in the district

court, it is not waived), cert. denied, 118 S. Ct. 1328 (1998).

Nevertheless, this appeal is frivolous. In reviewing

whether the district court complied with the dictates of Rule 11,

this court “conduct[s] a straightforward, two-question `harmless

error’ analysis: (1) Did the sentencing court in fact vary from

the procedures required by Rule 11, and (2) if so, did such

variance affect substantial rights of the defendant?” United

States v. Johnson, 1 F.3d 296, 298 (5th Cir. 1993) (en banc). 

Although he acknowledges his argument is subject to harmlesserror review, counsel makes no argument that Baeza’s substantial

rights were affected; accordingly, there is no reversible error. 

See id. 

The appeal is without arguable merit and is therefore

frivolous. Howard v. King, 707 F.2d 215, 220 (5th Cir. 1983); 

5th Cir. R. 42.2. Accordingly, it is DISMISSED. The

Government’s motion to consolidate is DENIED.

APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTION DENIED.
Served: October 20 , 2010

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY

WASHINGTON, DC

------------------------------------------------------------ 

### ATLANTIC SOUTHEAST AIRLINES

, INC

.

-----------------------------------------------------------



### NOTICE OF REGISTRATION OF TRADE NAME S

On October 6 , 2010

, Atlantic Southeast Airlines Inc. (“ ASA ”)

, a U.S

. certificated air carrier, 1 request ed

that the Department regist e r the trade name s “Continental Expr ess” and “Continental Connection ” for

use in certain air transportation operations

.

Part 215 (14 CFR Part 215) of the Department’s regulations provides that any air carrier wishing to use

an alternative trade name must first register th at name with the Department. The rule further states that

the Department may register such name after the air carrier gives notification to similarly named air

carriers of the proposed use of the name. In this case, ASA states that it currently operates unde r the

trade name “ United Express ,” and in light of the recent merger of United Air Lines Inc. (“United” ) and

Continental Airlines, Inc. (“Continental ” )

, ASA requires flexibi lity to operate as a Continental Express

and Continental Connection air carrier as well. Additionally, ASA states that Continental consents to

the registration of these trade names.

We note that ASA state s that Continental will make all required discl osures of the identity of the

operating air carrier and tr ade name in accordance with the provisions of Part 257 of the Department’s

regulations (14 CFR Part 257)

. In addi tion, ASA states that the aircraft to be used to operate service on

behalf of Continental will clearly indicate that ASA is the operating carrier.

Since ASA has complied with the requirements of Part 215, we acknowledge the registration of the trade

name s “ Continental Express ” and “Continental Connection” for immediate use in its operations.

Dated at Washington, D.C. , Oc tober 20 , 2010

.

TODD M. HOMAN

Director

Office of Aviation Analysis

An electronic version of this document is available on the World Wide Web at:

http:// www.regulations.gov

1 ASA’s i nterstate certificate was last reissued by Order 98

- 7

- 6, on July 8, 1998.Attachment A

SE RVICE LIST FOR ASA AIRLINES, INC.

MR GERALD MURPHY

COUNSEL FOR ASA AIRLINES INC

CROWELL AND MORING LLP

1001 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE NW

WASHINGTON DC 20 004 MR BERNARD STANKUS RTS

- 42

OFFICE OF AIRLINE INFORMATION

DOT/RSPA/BTS E

- 36

1200 NEW JERSEY AVE SE

WASHINGTON DC 20590

MR BRUCE RABINOVITZ

WILMER HALE

1875 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE NW

WASHINGTON DC 20006 MR WILLIAM J WEBER

CERTIFICATION MANAGE R

FAA AFS

- 900

45005 AVIATION DRIVE SUITE 131

DULLES VA 20166

MR R BRUCE KEINER

CROWELL AND MORING LLP

1001 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE NW

WASHINGTON DC 20 004 MR PETER LYNCH

ASST CHIEF COUNSEL FOR E NFORCEMENT

FAA / AGC

- 300

800 INDEPENDENCE AVE SW

WASHINGTON DC 20591

MR CLAY MORITZ

OFFICE OF AIRLINE INFORMATION

DOT/RSPA/BTS E

- 36

1200 NEW JERSEY AVE SE

WASHINGTON DC 20590
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED FE BRUARY 6, 2014

NO. 03

- 11

- 00662

- CV

The City of Austin d/b/a Austin Energy; and Larr y Weis, General Manager,

Austin Energy, Appellant s

v.

MET Center NYCTEX, Phase II, Ltd., Appelle e

APPEAL FROM THE 98TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY

BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, HE NSON, AND GOODWIN

AFFIRMED

-- OPINION BY JUSTICE GOODWIN ; JUSTICE HENSON NOT PARTICIPATING

This is an appeal from the interlocutory order signed by the tr i a l court on October 11, 2011

.

Having reviewed the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no

reversible error in the tri al court’s interlocutory order. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial

court’s interlocutory order. The appellant s shall pay all costs relating to this appeal, both in this

Court and the court below.
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS4659 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
# C_2019082EN.01004901.xml

| 4.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/49

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 December 2018 — Monolith Frost v EUIPO — Dovgan (PLOMBIR)

(Case T-830/16) (1)

((EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark PLOMBIR - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Examination of the facts - Article 76(1) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 95(1) of Regulation 2017/1001) - Evidence submitted for the first time before the General Court))

(2019/C 82/56)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Monolith Frost GmbH (Leopoldshöhe, Germany) (represented by: E. Liebich and S. Labesius, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Söder, D. Walicka and M. Fischer, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Dovgan GmbH (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: J.-C. Plate and R. Kaase, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 22 September 2016 (Case R 1812/2015-4) relating to invalidity proceedings between Monolith Frost and Dovgan.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 22 September 2016 (Case R 1812/2015-4); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 22 September 2016 (Case R 1812/2015-4);

| 2. | Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Monolith Frost GmbH, including the costs necessarily incurred by Monolith Frost for the purpose of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Monolith Frost GmbH, including the costs necessarily incurred by Monolith Frost for the purpose of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO;

| 3. | Orders Dovgan GmbH to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Dovgan GmbH to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 22, 23.1.2017.

---
# C_2018042EN.01001901.xml

| 5.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 42/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 42/19

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 December 2017 — HQ v CPVO

(Case T-592/16) (1)

1

((Civil Service - Members of the temporary staff - Fixed-term contract - Decision not to renew - Manifest error of assessment - Duty of care - Principle of sound administration - Right to be heard - Psychological harassment - Misuse of powers - Liability))

(2018/C 042/26)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: HQ (represented by: L. Levi and A. Blot, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendants: Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO) (represented by: A. Verdini, acting as Agent, assisted by D. Waelbroeck and de A. Duron, lawyers)

Defendants:

Re:

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU, seeking, first, annulment of the CPVO decisions of 24 June 2015 not to renew the applicant's contract and of 20 January 2016 rejecting the complaint and, secondly, compensation for the harm allegedly suffered by the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders HQ to bear the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders HQ to bear the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 251, of 11.7.2016 (case initially registered before the European Union Civil Service Tribunal under Case No F-22/16 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1.9.2016).

1

---
# C_2017293EN.01000701.xml

| 4.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 293/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.9.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 293/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 July 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the cour d’appel de Mons — Belgium) — Christian Ferenschild v JPC Motor SA

(Case C-133/16) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Sale of consumer goods and associated guarantees - Directive 1999/44/EC - Article 5(1) - Period of liability of the seller - Limitation period - Second subparagraph of Article 7(1) - Second-hand goods - Contractual reduction of the seller’s liability))

(2017/C 293/09)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Cour d’appel de Mons

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Christian Ferenschild

Applicant:

Defendant: JPC Motor SA

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 5(1) and the second subparagraph of Article 7(1) of Directive 1999/44/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 May 1999 on certain aspects of the sale of consumer goods and associated guarantees must be interpreted as precluding a rule of a Member State which allows the limitation period for action by the consumer to be shorter than two years from the time of delivery of the goods where the Member State has made use of the option given by the latter of those two provisions, and the seller and consumer have agreed on a period of liability of the seller of less than two years, namely a one-year period, for the second-hand goods concerned.

---

(1)  OJ C 191, 30.5.2016.

1

---
# C_2017053EN.01002003.xml

| 20.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 53/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 53/20

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Hamburg (Germany) lodged on 4 November 2016 — Birgit Bossen and Others v Brussels Airlines

(Case C-559/16)

(2017/C 053/26)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Amtsgericht Hamburg

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Birgit Bossen, Anja Bossen, Gudula Gräßmann

Applicants:

Defendant: Brussels Airlines

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Is the second sentence of Article 7(1) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 (1) to be interpreted as meaning that the concept of ‘distance’ relates only to the direct distance calculated between the point of departure and the last destination on the basis of the ‘great circle’ method, regardless of the distance actually flown?

1

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91(OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1).

1

---