alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2022073EN.01003301.xml

| 14.2.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 73/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.2.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 73/33

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 December 2021 — HG v Commission

(Case T-693/16 P RENV-RX) (1)

(Appeal - Civil service - Officials - Posting to a third country - Family lodging provided by the administration - Non-compliance with the obligation to reside there with the family - Disciplinary procedure - Disciplinary penalty of deferment of advancement to a higher step - Making good of any damage suffered by the European Union - Article 22 of the Staff Regulations - Dismissal of the action on the merits - Setting aside on appeal - Judgment on appeal re-examined by the Court of Justice and set aside - Referral back to the General Court)

(2022/C 73/37)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Appellant: HG (represented by: L. Levi, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: T. Bohr acting as Agent, and A. Dal Ferro, lawyer)

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (Second Chamber) of 19 July 2016, HG v Commission (F-149/15, EU:F:2016:155), seeking to have that judgment set aside.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets aside the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (Second Chamber) of 19 July 2016, HG v Commission (F-149/15); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets aside the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union (Second Chamber) of 19 July 2016, HG v Commission (F-149/15);

| 2. | Fixes the amount of compensation owed by HG to the European Union at the sum of EUR 80 000 on the date of delivery of this judgment; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Fixes the amount of compensation owed by HG to the European Union at the sum of EUR 80 000 on the date of delivery of this judgment;

| 3. | Dismisses the action in Case F-149/15 as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Dismisses the action in Case F-149/15 as to the remainder;

| 4. | Orders HG and the European Commission to bear their own costs in Cases F-149/15, T-693/16 P, T-440/18 RENV and T-693/16 P-RENV-RX. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders HG and the European Commission to bear their own costs in Cases F-149/15, T-693/16 P, T-440/18 RENV and T-693/16 P-RENV-RX.

---

(1)  OJ C 441, 28.11.2016.

---
Exhibit 99.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Duke Capital Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert P. Brace, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:





(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934; and





(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/    ROBERT P. BRACERobert P. Brace Vice President and Chief Financial Officer November 14, 2002
No. 57927.

protests 153327-K, etc. (New York).

#### The Wing On Co. and W. J. Byrnes & Co. of N. Y., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the articles in question consist of silent butlers, smoothing irons, and trays the same in all material respects as those involved in *Ignaz Strauss & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 342, C. D. 710), *The Fan Co.*v. *United States*(25 Cust. Ct. 42, C. D. 1261), and *Ignaz Strauss & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(28 Cust. Ct. 280, C. D. 1423), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of J. Crew Group, Inc. and J. Crew
Operating Corp. (collectively, the "Company") of Form 10-Q for the period ending
August 3, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Scott M. Rosen, Acting Chief Executive Officer of the
Company and Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.


                                            By:  /s/ Scott M. Rosen
                                               --------------------------------
                                                  Scott M. Rosen
                                                  Acting Chief Executive Officer
                                                  September 6, 2002

                                            By:  /s/ Scott M. Rosen
                                               --------------------------------
                                                  Scott M. Rosen
                                                  Executive Vice - President and
                                                  Chief Financial Officer
                                                  September 6, 2002

EXPLANATORY NOTE: Since the departure of Mark Sarvary as former Chief Executive
Officer of J.Crew Group, Inc. and J.Crew Operating Corp. on May 1, 2002, Scott
M. Rosen has performed the functions of each registrant's principal executive
officer on an interim basis in addition to being each registrant's principal
financial officer.
Order entered June 1 8 , 2013

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 13
- 00446
- CV IDEAL ROOFING, INC., Appellant

V. MIKE ARMBRUSTER, ET AL., Appellee s On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

Dallas County, Texas Trial C ourt Cause No. CC
- 11
- 03420
- E



### O RDER
We GRANT appellees’ June 12, 2013 motion for an extension of time to file a brief. Appellees shall file their brief on or before July 1, 2013. We caution appellees that no further extension of time will be granted in this accelerated appeal absent extraordinary circumstances.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT CHIEF JUSTICE
No. 59991.

#### Remington Rand, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 246076-K (A), etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of wooden containers of typewriters which constitute the usual and ordinary containers of typewriters and are not suitable for any other use. On the record presented and following *United States*v. *American Railway Express Co.*(11 Ct. Cust. Appls. 211, T. D. 38968), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 53936.

#### H. W. Brown et al. *v.*United States,

protests 151254-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                      CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of J.Crew Group, Inc. and J.Crew
Operating Corp. (collectively, the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended
August 2, 2003 (the "Report"), Millard S. Drexler and Nicholas Lamberti, the
Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

1.   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material
     respects the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: September 17, 2003

/s/ Millard S. Drexler
--------------------------
   Millard S.Drexler
   Chief Executive Officer


/s/ Nicholas Lamberti
--------------------------
   Nicholas Lamberti
   Acting Chief Financial Officer

  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0181

STATE OF MONTANA, 

Plaintiff and Appellee, 

v. 

SANDRA LYNNE JONES,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion for extension of time, 

and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension 

of time to and including September 30, 2024, within which to prepare, 

file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 22 2024

07/22/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0181
Before the Second Division,

December 8, 1959

No. 63576.

protest 309172-K (Ogdensburg).

#### Aluminum Limited Sales, Inc. *v.*United States,

*424Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of aluminum alloys similar in all material respects to those the subject of *C. J. Tower & Sons*v. *United States*(45 C.C.P.A. 43, C.A.D. 670), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
IPAC Operational Metrics for November 2023
CERTIFICATION

Principal Financial Officer


         I, Patricia M. Spreitzer, certify that:
                    ===
1. I have  reviewed  this  Annual  Report  on  Form  10-KSB/A  of Bio  Solutions
Manufacturing, Inc

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer(s)  and I are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a- 15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

     a.  Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused  such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
     b. Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's  disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and
     c. Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over  financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most recent
fiscal quarter (the registrant's  fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual
report) that has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying  officer(s) and I have disclosed,  based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,  to the
registrant's  auditors  and the audit  committee  of the  registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a. All significant  deficiencies  and material  weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and
     b. Any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves  management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial matters.

Dated: January 12, 2006       By:  /s/ Patricia M. Spreitzer
                                ---------------------------------
                              Patricia M. Spreitzer,
                              Chief Financial Officer,
# C_2019246EN.01002101.xml

| 22.7.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 246/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.7.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 246/21

---

Order of the General Court of 22 May 2019 — Puma v EUIPO — CMS (CMS Italy)

(Case T-161/16) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - International registration designating the European Union - Figurative mark CMS Italy - Earlier international figurative marks representing a feline bounding to the left - Relative grounds for refusal - Reputation of the earlier marks - Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Evidence of reputation - Previous decisions of EUIPO recognising the reputation of the earlier marks - Taking account of those decisions - Obligation to state reasons - Principle of sound administration)

(2019/C 246/21)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Puma SE (Herzogenaurach, Germany) (represented by: P. González-Bueno Catalán de Ocón, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Walicka, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Costruzione Macchine Speciali Srl (CMS) (Alonte, Italy)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 29 January 2016 (Case R 229/2015-2), relating to opposition proceedings between Puma and Costruzione Macchine Speciali (CMS).

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 29 January 2016 (Case R 229/2015-2) is annulled. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 29 January 2016 (Case R 229/2015-2) is annulled.

| 2. | EUIPO shall pay the costs, including those incurred by Puma SE. |
| --- | --- |

2.

EUIPO shall pay the costs, including those incurred by Puma SE.

---

(1)  OJ C 222, 20.6.2016.

---
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

          - [Release No. 34-98863; File No. SR-NYSE-2023-35]

                    On September 28, 2023, New York Stock Exchange LLC (“NYSE”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”), pursuant to section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Act” or “Exchange Act”) [1]                                          and Rule 19b-4 thereunder [2]                                          a proposed rule change to amend its Price List to: (1) modify fee rates and requirements for transactions that remove liquidity from the Exchange; (2) offer a monthly rebate for Designated Market Maker units with 150 or fewer assigned securities along with incentives for affiliated Supplemental Liquidity Providers; and (3) eliminate an underutilized fee for transactions that remove liquidity from the Exchange in Tape B and C securities. The proposed rule change was published for comment on October 4, 2023.[3]                                          On November 1, 2023, NYSE withdrew the proposed rule change (SR-NYSE-2023-35).                

                        For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.[4] 

Sherry R. Haywood,

Assistant Secretary.

# Footnotes

1.                             15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1).                    
        Back to Citation      

2.                             17 CFR 240.19b-4.                    
        Back to Citation      

3.                                                     *See*                         Securities Exchange Act Release No. 98666 (September 29, 2023), 88 FR 68718 (October 4, 2023).                    
        Back to Citation      

4.                                 17 CFR 200.30-3(a)(12).                        
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2023-24865 Filed 11-9-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
# C_2017231EN.01002202.xml

| 17.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 231/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 231/22

---

Judgment of the General Court of 17 May 2017 — Piessevaux v Council

(Case T-519/16) (1)

1

((Civil service - Officials - Pensions - Transfer of pension rights to the European Union pension scheme - Proposal concerning the crediting of additional pensionable years - Article 11(2) of Annex VIII to the Staff Regulations - New general implementing provisions - Equal treatment - Acquired rights - Legitimate expectations))

(2017/C 231/27)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Vincent Piessevaux (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: initially by D. de Abreu Caldas and J.-N. Louis, then by J.-N. Louis, and finally by L. Ponteville, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and E. Rebasti, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application based on Article 270 TFEU and seeking annulment of the Council’s decision of 7 October 2013 definitively fixing, for the purposes of the European Union pension scheme, the pension rights acquired by the applicant following the transfer of the rights which he had acquired, prior to entering the service of the EU, from national pension bodies.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Vincent Piessevaux to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Vincent Piessevaux to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 421, 24.11.2014 (case initially registered with the European Union Civil Service Tribunal as Case F-91/14 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1 September 2016).

1

---
Exhibit 32 SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION  CERTIFICATION  In connection with the annual report of Powder River Basin Gas Corp. (the ACompany@) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the AReport@), I, Brian Fox, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:  (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   Date: April 2, 2007 /S/Brian Fox Brian Fox Principal Executive Officer Principal Financial Officer
<PAGE>



                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         I, David L. Gamsey, Chief Financial Officer of Innotrac Corporation
(the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350 as adopted by ss.906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the quarter ended
         March 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
         Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.

Dated: May 14, 2003           /s/ David L. Gamsey
                              --------------------
                              David L. Gamsey
                              Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and
                              Secretary



A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS BEEN
PROVIDED TO INNOTRAC CORPORATION AND WILL BE RETAINED BY INNOTRAC CORPORATION
AND FURNISHED TO THE SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ITS STAFF UPON REQUEST.
(Reap. Dec. 10667)

Entry No. 3291, etc.

#### F. *W.*Myers & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States

(Decided January 23, 1964)

*Barnes, Richardson*<£ *Oolbum*for the plaintiffs.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Rao, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, annexed to this decision and made a part hereof, were submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that the items on the invoices covered by the reappraisement appeals listed in Schedule “A”, attached hereto' and made a part hereof, which are marked “A” and initialed OLL MGM EK by Examiner O. L. Lombard M. G. Montpelier E. Kavanaugh consist of vat-lined pulpboard similar in all material respects to the merchandise the subject of *A. N. Deringer, Inc.*v. *United States,*Reap. Dec. 9927, and therein held to be dutiable on the basis of export value under Sec. 402(b), Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956; that the record in said Reap. Dec. 9927 may be incorporated herein; that at the time of exportation said export value was the invoice price; and that the instant appeals may be submitted upon this stipulation.

Upon tbe agreed facts and tbe cited authority, I find export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (b) of tbe Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by tbe Customs Simplification Act of 1956, to be the proper basis for tbe determination of tbe value of tbe merchandise covered by these appeals for reappraisement and identified by items marked “A” and initialed CLL, MGM, or FK, by Examiner C. L. Lombard, M. G. Montpelier, or F. Kavanaugh, and that such value is the invoice price.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.