alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# Supreme Court of Florida

____________ No. SC17

- 1343

____________ DENNIS SOCHOR, Appellant,

vs. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee. [January 30, 2018]

PER CURIAM. We have for review Dennis Sochor’s appeal of the circuit court’s order denying Sochor’s motion filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.851. This Court has jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(1), Fla. Const. Sochor’s motion sought relief pur suant to the United States Supreme Court’s
decision in Hurst v. Florida , 136 S. Ct. 616 (2016), and our decision on remand in
Hurst v. State ( Hurst ), 202 So. 3d 40 (Fla. 2016), cert. denied , 137 S. Ct. 2161 (2017). This Court stayed Sochor’s appeal pendin g the disposition of Hitchcock v.
State , 226 So. 3d 216 (Fla. 2017), cert. denied , 138 S. Ct. 513 (2017) . After this- 2

-

Court decided Hitchcock , Sochor responded to this Court’s order to show cause arguing why Hitchcock should not be dispositive in this case

. After reviewing Sochor’s response to the order to show cause, as well as the State’s arguments in reply, we conclude that Sochor is not entitled to relief. Sochor was sentenced to death following a jury’s recommendation for death by a
vote of ten to two

. Sochor v. State , 619 So. 2d 285 , 288 (Fla. 1993). Sochor’s
sentence of death became final in 1994. Sochor v. Florida , 510 U.S. 1025 (1994). Thus, Hurst does not apply retroactively to Sochor’s sentence of death. See
Hitchcock , 226 So. 3d at 217. Ac cordingly, we affirm the denial of Sochor’s
motion. The Court having carefully considered all arguments raised by Sochor , we caution that any rehearing motion containing reargument will be stricken. It is so
ordered. LABARGA, C.J., and QUINCE, POLSTON, an d LAWSON, JJ., concur. PARIENTE, J., concurs in result with an opinion. LEWIS and CANADY, JJ., concur in result. PARIENTE, J., concurring in result. I concur in result because I recognize that this Court’s opinion in Hitchcock
v. State , 226 So. 3d 216 (Fla . 2017), cert. denied , 138 S. Ct. 513 (2017), is now final. However, I continue to adhere to the views expressed in my dissenting opinion in Hitchcock

.- 3

-

An Appeal from the Circuit Court in and for Broward County, Paul L. Backman , Judge

- Case No. 061986CF015270A88810 Neal Dupree, Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Jason Kruszka, Staff A tt orney, and Rachel L. Day , Assistant Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Southern Region, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, for Appellant Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney Ge neral, Tallahassee, Florida, and Donna M. Perry, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach , Florida, for Appellee
Before the Second Division,

November 23, 1955

No. 59477.

protest 196039-K/14149 (New Orleans).

#### W. R. Zanes & Co. of La., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of steel strips Similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 58580, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# C_2016326EN.01002003.xml

| 5.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/20

---

Order of the President of the Court of 21 April 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Kúria — Hungary) — Damien Zöldség, Gyümölcs Kereskedelmi és Tanácsadó Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatóság

(Case C-114/16) (1)

1

(2016/C 326/37)

Language of the case: Hungarian

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 211, 13.6.2016.

1

---
# C_2017221EN.01002802.xml

| 10.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 221/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 221/28

---

Order of the General Court of 4 May 2017 — De Masi v Commission

(Case T-341/16) (1)

1

((Action for annulment - Access to documents - Request for access on the basis of the inter-institutional cooperation by virtue of Article 230 TFEU - Documents concerning the work of the ‘Code of conduct (Business Taxation)’ group instituted by the Council - Act not open to challenge - Inadmissibility))

(2017/C 221/40)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Fabio De Masi (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by: A. Fischer-Lescano, professor)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Erlbacher and J. Baquero Cruz, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application on the basis of Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of the decision contained in the Commission’s letter of 8 June 2016, responding to the request of the President of the European Parliament’s Special Committee on Tax Rulings and Other Measures Similar in Nature or Effect (TAXE2) for full access to the documents of the ‘Code of conduct (Business Taxation)’ group.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | Mr Fabio De Masi shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Mr Fabio De Masi shall bear his own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 287, 8.8.2016.

1

---
Before the Third Division,

October 9, 1947

No. 51943.

#### Rosenblum Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 963648-G, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of cheese similar in all material respects to that the subject of *S. A. Haram*v. *United States*(17 Cust. Ct. 37, C. D. 1016). In accordance therewith the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Good Neighbor Environmental Board

Agenda

Tuesday, April 2, 2013

12pm – 4pm

12:00 (EST) Welcome and Introductions

 Mark Joyce, Associate Director

GNEB Acting Designated Federal Officer

 Cynthia Jones-Jackson, Acting Director

U.S. EPA Office of Federal Advisory Committee Management and Outreach

 Diane Austin, Chair

Good Neighbor Environmental Board

 Board Members 

12:30 – 12:40 Overview of Agenda

 Diane Austin, Chair

Good Neighbor Environmental Board

12:40 – 1:40 Discussion of Meetings, Report Process and Timeline

 Budget

 Upcoming meetings

 Reports

1:40 – 3:50 Discussion on Report

 Topic

 Moving forward

3:50 – 4:00 Public Comments

4:00 Adjourn
Ex. 99.3 a)

                         ANNUAL SERVICING CERTIFICATION


The undersigned officer certifies the following for Cendant Mortgage Corp. for
the 2003 calendar year. To the best of our knowledge:

a)       The activities and performances of the Servicer during the preceding
         fiscal eyar under the terms of the Servicing Agreement, Trust
         Agreement, Pooling and Servicing Agreement and/or Servicer Guide and to
         the best of my knowledge, the Servicer has fulfilled all of its duties,
         responsibilities or obligations under these Agreements throughout such
         year, or if there has been a default or failure of the Servicer to
         perform any such duties, responsibilities or obligations, a description
         of each default or failure and the nature and status thereof has been
         reported to Bank of NY:

b)       The Servicer is currently an approved FNMA or FHLMC Servicer in good
         standing;

c)       The Fidelity Bond, the Errors and Omissions Insurance Policy and any
         other bonds required under the terms of the Servicing Agreement, Trust
         Agreement, Pooling and Servicing Agreement and/or Servicer Guide are in
         full force and effect;

d)       All premiums for each Hazard Insurance Policy, Flood Insurance Policy
         (if applicable) and Primary Mortgage Insurance Policy (if applicable),
         with respect to each Mortgaged Property, have been paid and that such
         insurance policies are in full force and effect;

e)       All real estate taxes, governmental assessments and any other expenses
         accrued and due, that if not paid could result in a lien or encumbrance
         on any Mortgage Property, have been paid, or if any such costs or
         expenses have been paid with respect to any Mortgaged Property, the
         reason for the non-payment has been reported to Bank of NY;

f)       All Custodial Accounts have been reconciled and are properly funded;
         and

g)       All annual reports of Foreclosure and Abandonment of Mortgaged Property
         required per section 6050J and 6050P of the Internal

<PAGE>

         Revenue Code, respectively, have been prepared and filed.


By: /s/ Marc J. Hinkle
    -------------------
    (Signature)

    Marc J. Hinkle
    ------------------
    (Printed name)

    Vice President Loan Servicing
    -------------------------------
    (Title)

    3-26-04
    ----------
    (Date)
EXHIBIT 32.1

THE FOLLOWING CERTIFICATION IS PROVIDED BY THE UNDERSIGNED CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC. ON THE BASIS
OF SUCH OFFICER'S KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF COMPLYING WITH 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002.


                                  CERTIFICATION

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Midwest Banc Holdings, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 31, 2003 (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
                  amended; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.



                                              /s/Brad A. Luecke
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Name:    Brad A. Luecke
                                              Title:   President and
                                                       Chief Executive Officer
                                              Date:    July 30, 2003



                                              /s/Daniel R. Kadolph
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Name:    Daniel R. Kadolph
                                              Title:   Senior Vice President and
                                                       Chief Financial Officer
                                              Date:    July 30, 2003









         A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS
BEEN PROVIDED TO THE COMPANY AND WILL BE RETAINED BY THE COMPANY AND FURNISHED
TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION UPON REQUEST. THIS CERTIFICATION
ACCOMPANIES THE REPORT AND SHALL NOT BE TREATED AS HAVING BEEN FILED AS PART OF
THE REPORT.
Case 2:03-cv-05336-LDD Document 848 Filed 01/04/13 Page 1 of 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, 

 Petitioner 

 

 v. 

ROBERT J. POWELL, 

 Respondent 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

No. 1522 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 

No. 119 DB 2009 

Attorney Registration No. 58363 

(Luzerne County) 

 O R D E R 

PER CURIAM: 

 AND NOW, this 23rd day of January, 2015, there having been filed with this Court 

by Robert J. Powell his verified Statement of Resignation dated January 7, 2015, stating 

that he desires to resign from the Bar of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania in 

accordance with the provisions of Rule 215, Pa.R.D.E., it is 

 ORDERED that the resignation of Robert J. Powell is accepted; he is disbarred 

on consent from the Bar of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, retroactive to August 

31, 2009; and he shall comply with the provisions of Rule 217, Pa.R.D.E. Respondent 

shall pay costs, if any, to the Disciplinary Board pursuant to Rule 208(g), Pa.R.D.E.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 16-1008

DANIEL A. ROBERTS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

VIRGINIA BEACH COURT HOUSE; CITY OF VIRGINIA BEACH,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior

District Judge. (2:15-cv-00510-RGD-RJK)

Submitted: July 28, 2016 Decided: August 1, 2016

Before MOTZ and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Daniel A. Roberts, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Daniel A. Roberts appeals the district court’s order 

dismissing his action under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985 (2012). On 

appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the 

Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Roberts’

informal brief does not challenge the district court’s 

dispositive analysis, Roberts has forfeited appellate review of 

the court’s order. See Williams v. Giant Food Inc., 370 F.3d 

423, 430 n.4 (4th Cir. 2004). Accordingly, we affirm the 

district court’s judgment. We deny Roberts’ motion to 

reconsider. We dispense with oral argument because the facts 

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
##### 



Exhibit 11 AmerUs Group Co.
Statement Re: Computation of Earnings Per Share For The Three Months Ended March 31,2004
    
    2003Net
    
    Number of
    
    Per Share
    
    Net
    
    Number of
    
    Per ShareIncome
    
    Shares
    
    Amount
    
    Income
    
    Shares
    
    Amount($ in thousands, except per share amounts)Basic EPSNet income from
continuing
operations
    
    $
    29,740
    
    
    
    39,263
    
    
    $
    0.76
    
    
    $
    35,302
    
    
    
    38,985
    
    
    $
    0.91Effect of dilutive
securitiesOptions
    
    
    
    
    
    
    648
    
    
    
    (0.01
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    233
    
    
    
    (0.01
    )PRIDES
    
    
    
    
    
    
    524
    
    
    
    (0.01
    )
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    
    Diluted EPS
    
    $
    29,740
    
    
    
    40,435
    
    
    $
    0.74
    
    
    $
    35,302
    
    
    
    39,218
    
    
    $
    0.90
 40
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1310 

To amend the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act of 1975 to specify which 

depository institutions are subject to the maintenance of records and 

disclosure requirements of such Act, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

JUNE 7, 2017 

Mr. ROUNDS (for himself, Ms. HEITKAMP, Mr. TESTER, Mr. HOEVEN, Mr. 

DONNELLY, and Mr. KENNEDY) introduced the following bill; which was 

read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and 

Urban Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act of 1975 to 

specify which depository institutions are subject to the 

maintenance of records and disclosure requirements of 

such Act, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Home Mortgage Dis5 closure Adjustment Act’’. 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1310 IS

1 SEC. 2. DEPOSITORY INSTITUTIONS SUBJECT TO MAINTE2 NANCE OF RECORDS AND DISCLOSURE RE3 QUIREMENTS. 

4 (a) IN GENERAL.—Section 304 of the Home Mort5 gage Disclosure Act of 1975 (12 U.S.C. 2803) is amend6 ed— 

7 (1) by redesignating subsection (i) as paragraph 

8 (3) and adjusting the margins accordingly; and 

9 (2) by inserting before paragraph (3), as so re10 designated, the following: 

11 ‘‘(i) EXEMPTIONS.— 

12 ‘‘(1) CLOSED-END MORTGAGE LOANS.—With 

13 respect to a depository institution, the requirements 

14 of paragraphs (5) and (6) of subsection (b) shall not 

15 apply with respect to closed-end mortgage loans if 

16 the depository institution originated less than 500 

17 closed-end mortgage loans in each of the 2 preceding 

18 calendar years. 

19 ‘‘(2) OPEN-END LINES OF CREDIT.—With re20 spect to a depository institution, the requirements of 

21 paragraphs (5) and (6) of subsection (b) shall not 

22 apply with respect to open-end lines of credit if the 

23 depository institution originated less than 500 open24 end lines of credit in each of the 2 preceding cal25 endar years.’’. 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1310 IS

1 (b) TECHNICAL CORRECTION.—Section 304(i)(3) of 

2 the Home Mortgage Disclosure Act of 1975, as so redesig3 nated by subsection (a)(1), is amended by striking ‘‘sec4 tion 303(2)(A)’’ and inserting ‘‘section 303(3)(A)’’. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

__________________________________________

:

ANTHONY REID : CIVIL ACTION

:

vs. :

:

JEFFREY BEARD, et al. : NO. 04-2924

:

__________________________________________:

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 2nd day of September 2009, upon careful and independent

consideration of the Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 1), the Consolidated

Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 16), a review of the Report and

Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Lynne A. Sitarski (Doc. No. 41), and

consideration of Petitioner’s objections thereto, it is ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner’s Objections to the Report and Recommendation are DENIED;

2. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

3. The Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED with prejudice; 

 

4. There is no probable cause to issue a certificate of appealability; and 

 5. The Clerk of Court shall mark this case CLOSED for statistical purposes.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Robert F. Kelly 

ROBERT F. KELLY

SENIOR JUDGE

Case 2:04-cv-02924-RK Document 52 Filed 09/02/09 Page 1 of 1
No. 49976.

#### Protests 949852-G, etc., of F. Weintraub *&*Co. of N. Y., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the beads in question are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Eitinger Bead Co.*v. *United States*(13 Cust. Ct. 50, C. D. 867), certain of the items were held dutiable at 35 percent under paragraph 1503 and others at 20 percent under the same paragraph as modified by T. D. 49458. The protests were sustained to this extent.
# C_2017129EN.01001302.xml

| 24.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/13

---

Order of the President of the Court of 10 January 2017 — European Commission v Republic of Finland

(Case C-42/16) (1)

1

(2017/C 129/18)

Language of the case: Finnish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 118, 4.4.2016.

1

---
## S IXTH 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________
Case No. 6D2 3

- 2006 Lower Tribunal No. CF21

- 008422

- XX

_____________________________
M IGUEL A NGEL R ODRIGUEZ , Appellant
,

v.

S TATE OF F LORIDA , Appellee

.

_____________________________ Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County

. Lori A. Winstead , Judge.

April 2, 2024

PER CURIAM

.

AFFIRMED

.

MIZE
, BROWNLEE and GANNAM , JJ., c oncur.

Howard L. “Rex” Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Andrea M. Norgard , Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Katherine Coombs Cline, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

NOT FI NAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF TIMELY FILED
Case 2:05-cv-00112-PBT Document 3 Filed 02/03/05 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:05-cv-00112-PBT Document 3 Filed 02/03/05 Page 2 of 2
# C_2019082EN.01004001.xml

| 4.3.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 82/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.3.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 82/40

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 December 2018 — Ryanair and Airport Marketing Services v Commission

(Case T-77/16) (1)

((State aid - Agreements concluded with the airline Ryanair and its subsidiary Airport Marketing Services - Airport services - Marketing services - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery - Notion of State aid - Advantage - Private investor test - Recovery - Selectivity))

(2019/C 82/45)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Ryanair DAC, formerly Ryanair Ltd (Dublin, Ireland), Airport Marketing Services Ltd (Dublin) (represented by: G. Berrisch, E. Vahida, I.-G. Metaxas-Maranghidis, lawyers, and B. Byrne, Solicitor)

Defendant: Commission (represented by: L. Armati, L. Flynn and S. Noë, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Republic of Latvia (represented initially by: D. Pelše, J. Treijs-Gigulis and I. Kalniņš, and subsequently by I. Kucina, acting as Agents) and Council of the European Union (represented by: S. Boelaert and S. Petrova, acting as Agents)

Re:

Action under Article 263 TFEU for partial annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2016/152 of 1 October 2014 on State aid SA 27339 (12/C) (ex 11/NN) implemented by Germany for Zweibrücken airport and airlines using the airport (OJ 2016 L 34, p. 68).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Article 1(2) of Commission Decision (EU) 2016/152 of 1 October 2014 on State aid SA 27339 (12/C) (ex 11/NN) implemented by Germany for Zweibrücken airport and airlines using the airport, and Articles 3, 4 and 5 of that decision, in so far as they concern Ryanair DAC and Airport Marketing Services Ltd; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Article 1(2) of Commission Decision (EU) 2016/152 of 1 October 2014 on State aid SA 27339 (12/C) (ex 11/NN) implemented by Germany for Zweibrücken airport and airlines using the airport, and Articles 3, 4 and 5 of that decision, in so far as they concern Ryanair DAC and Airport Marketing Services Ltd;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by Ryanair and Airport Marketing Services; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by Ryanair and Airport Marketing Services;

| 3. | Orders the Council of the European Union to pay its own costs; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Council of the European Union to pay its own costs;

| 4. | Orders the Republic of Latvia to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the Republic of Latvia to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 165, 10.5.2016.

---
## Proposed Rule: Deferred Reporting of Certain Data Elements under the GHG Reporting Rule

Meeting Documentation : American Chemistry Council 3/9/11 Date Staff Contact Information Name of Organization Summary of Discussion Written Comments Provided? Did they also submit to Docket? Date sent to EPA

CCD

3/9/11 Jessica Gordon

Gordon.jessica@epa.gov Bill Irving Irving.bill@epa.gov Amy Branning Branning.amy@epa.gov Jennifer Bohman Bohman.jennifer@epa.gov Deborah Ottinger Ottinger.deborah@epa.gov Tom Land Land.tom@epa. gov Lorraine Gershman, ACC Jim Griffin, ACC Leslie Hulse, ACC Brendan Mascarenhas, ACC David DiMarcello, BASF Bob Reich, DuPont Karen Murphy, Ashland Shari Keller, Shell Mike Witt, Dow* Al McMahon, SABIC* Gary Rabik, Braskem* Mike Vancil, LANXESS* Mark Hall, InEnTec* *participated via phone 1. What EPA is doing to ensure that all reporters can get the emission data submitted by March 31 2. Any outstanding registration problems with e

GGRT 3. Next steps on CBI 4. When EPA expects to publicly release the emissions data, and how such data will be presented to the public 5. What EPA plans to do with all of the collected data Submitted to Docket N / A