GENERAL SHALE

BRICK'S

BRICK KILN

IN

LOUISVILLE, KENTUCKY

ON

DECEMBER 18, 2001TABLE OF CONTENTS

Section

2

3

4 Page
Introduction and Executive

Summary 1

Test Results Summary

of Test Results Table1 Summarized

Test Results

.................... 2 2 Summarized

Sulfur Dioxide

Results 3 Graph1 Brick Kiln Emissions

(Sulfur Dioxide) 4 Computer Input Parameters

................... 5 Complete Results Sampling and Analytical

Procedures

................. 7 Figures1 Stack Breeching

and Sample

Point Location

.................................. 12
Field Data SO2 Field Data Sheets

.............................. 13 Nomenclature & Equations

SO2

...................... 25 Nomenclature & Equations

O•/CO2

................... 26

5

6 Plant Production

Data

............................. 27 QA/QC Procedures

and Results Calibrations and Gas Certificates

................... 28

LREPORT CERTIFICATION

The sampling

and analysis

performed

for this report were carried out under my direction and hereby

certify that the test report is authentic•/a,cyrate.

Date: ,•'VL

,•1,•7

Signature:

,•.'/••,

Torn• Lotz, Jr. / Program Manager

have reviewed

the testing details and results in this report, and hereby

certify that the test report is authentic

and accurate

to the best of my knowledge.

Date: ..)5:,.,.•

c3
Thomas

E. Lotz Senior Program

Manager

SOURCE OWNER:

OPERATOR'S NAME/LOCATION:

SOURCE NAME:

SOURCE IDENTIFICATIONS:

TESTS PERFORMED:

REFERENCE METHOD

TESTS:

TEST SUPERVISOR:

DATES TESTS

CONDUCTED:

OWNER'S REPRESENTATIVE: General

Shale Brick

General Shale Louisville, Kentucky

Brick Tunnel

Kiln, plant 38
Permit# 153-97 TV Emisssion

Unit U7 Compliance Test

Sulfur Dioxide

EPA Method

6C

Mr. Tommy

Lotz, Jr.

December 18, 2001

Mr. Phil Towles

Environmental

Specialist

iiiiNTRODUCTiON AND EXECUTIVE SUMMARYiNTRODUCTiON & EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Kilkelly Environmental

Associates

(KEA) was contracted

by General

Shale Brick to perform source emissions

testing on the Brick Tunnel

Kiln, plant 38 (permit#

153-97 TV Emisssion Unit U7 ) operated

by General

Shale and located

in Louisville,

Kentucky. Stack gas concentrations

of sulfur dioxide

(SO2) were measured.

The SO2 emission limit for the Brick Tunnel

Kiln is 28.63 grains/100

DSCF at 0% oxygen.

The control devices

associated

with the kiln are a lime slurry scrubber

in line with a baghouse before exhaust.

SIC Code 3251 Face Brick/Structural

Manufacture

of brick from shale. The manufacturing

process

involves

mining,

grinding,

screening,

and blending of the raw materials

followed

by forming,

cutting or shaping,

drying, firing (or curing), cooling,

storage,

and shipping

of the final products.

Mr. Tommy

Lotz, Jr. supervised

the KEA test team in performing

the emissions

tests and collecting

the test data on December

18, 2001. Mr. Phil Towles

representing General Shale Brick, coordinated

the test program

with process

operations.

Ms. Jeani Bryant of the Air Pollution

Control

District of Jefferson

County

observed

the tests.

The testing started

at 0742 and ended at 1056. The sulfur dioxide

results of 15.14, 18.40, and 21.50 grains per 100 dry standard

cubic foot at 0% oxygen

resulted

in an average of 18.17 grains per dry standard

cubic foot which is 64% of the allowable standard of 28.63 grains per dry standard

cubic foot.SUMMARY OF TEST

RESULTS

The following

is a summary

of the sulfur dioxide

emissions

on the Brick Tunnel

Kiln stack conducted

on December

18, 2001. For complete

information,

see the following
table (Table 1).

Run Numbers Run 1

Run 2

Run 3 Average

Date 12-18-01

12-18-01

12-18-01
Time 0742 -0842

0849-0949

0956-1056

28.58 39.86 Sulfur Dioxide,

ppm
Sulfur Dioxide,

gr/100 dscf
Sulfur Dioxide,

gr/100 dscf @ 0% oxygen Oxygen, %
Carbon Dioxide,

%

Allowable SO 2 Conc., gr/100dscf@ 0% O•

% of Alowable 3.33

15.14

3.48

18.40

16.31 16.95

3.54 3.14

28.63 28.63

53 64

34.46

4.01

21.50

17.00

3.09

28.63

75

30.97

3.61

18.17

16.75
3.26

28.63

L

2 I•CE•ATEST RESULTSKILKELLY ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES P,O. BOX 426 TRUSSViLLE, AL 35173 205=661-0743

Brick Tunnel Kiln

Run Number

Test Date

Test Location

Test Time Oxygen Content,

% v/v

Carbon Dioxide Content,

% v/v

Sulfur Dioxide,

ppm

Sulfur Dioxide,

gall00 dscf

Sulfur Dioxide, gr/100 dscf @ 0% oxygen

Allowable Sulfur Dioxide, gall00 dscf @ 0% oxygen 1

2

t2/18/01 12/18/01

Outlet Outlet

0742-0842 0849-0949

16.31 16.95

3.55 3.14

28.58 29.86

3.33 3.48

3

12/18/01

Outlet

0956-1056

17.00

3.09

34.46

4.01

Average

12/18/01

Outlet

0742-1056

16.75

3.26

30.97

3.61

15.14 18.40

21.50

18.17

28.63 28.63

28.63

28.63

L Table 2

• KE•AKILKELEY ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES

Run Number

Test Date

Test Location

Test Time P.O. BOX 426 TRUSSVILLE, AL 35'i73 205-661 =0743
Brick Tunnel Kiln

Summarized Air Test Results

for General

Shale Brick

1 2

3

Average

12/18/01 12/18/01

12/18/01

12/18/01

Outlet Outlet

Outlet

Outlet

0742-0842 0849-0949

0956-1056

0742-1056

O 35

o

o 25

"• 2O

•0

• 5

0 0 15.14

Tunnel

Kiln

SO2

Emissions
On December

18, 2001

28.63 28.63 28.63 28.63

18.40 21.50
18.17

3

Run Number I[]SO2 [] Allowed

SO2

Average

Graph 1KILKELLY ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES P.O. BOX 426 TRUSSVILLE, AL 35173 205-661-0743
Brick Tunnel Kiln

Run Number

Test Date

Test Location

Test Time

Barometric Pressure,

in Hg

Run Time, minutes

Sulfur Dioxide,

ppm

% Oxygen

% Carbon Dioxide 1

2

3
12/18/01 12/18/01

12/18/01

Outlet Outlet

Outlet

0742-0842 0849-0949

0956-1056

29.63 29.63

29.63

60 60

60

28.58 29.86

34.46

16.31 16.95

17.00

3.55 3.14

3.09

Average

12/18/01

Outlet

0742-1056

29.63

60

30.97

16.75

3.26KILKELLY ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES P.O. BOX 426 TRUSSVILLE, AL 35173 205=661-0743

Brick Tunnel Kiln

Run Number

Test Date

Test Location

Test Time

11. Sulfur Dioxide Concentration Pounds/DSCF Grains/DSCF Grains/100 dscf Grains/100 dscf @ 0% Oxygen 1

2

3

12/18/01 12/18/01

12/18/01

Outlet Outlet

Outlet

0742-0842 0849-0949

0956-1056

4.75E-006 4.97E-006

5.73E-006 0.0333 0.0348

0.0401 3.33 3.48

4.01 15.14 18.40

21.50

Average

12/18/01

Outlet

0742-1056

5.15E-006 0.03613.6118.17

LSAMPLING AND ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES3. SAMPLING

AND

ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES

General

All sampling

and analytical

procedures

for the determination

ot: the particulate

emissions from these sources

were conducted

in accordance

with the Code of Federal

Regulations,
Title 40, Part 60, Appendix

A, Methods

1-4, 3A & 6C, as amended.

The sampling equipment used in these tests was properly

calibrated

(See Calibrations).

The sulfur dioxide was determined

on a dry basis using a nondispersive

infrared

instrument

and then corrected to 0% oxygen

using a Teledyne

oxygen

instrument.

METHOD 6C "This method

is applicable

to the determination

of sulfur dioxide

(SO•) concentrations in controlled

and uncontrolled

emissions

from stationary

sources

only when specified

within the regulations.

A gas sample

is continuously

extracted

from a stack, and a portion

of the sample is conveyed

to an instrumental

analyzerfor

determination

of SO 2 gas concentration using an ultraviolet

(UV), nondispersive

infrared

(NDIR),

or fluorescence

analyzer. Performance specifications

and test procedures

are provided

to ensure reliable

data. The analytical

range is determined

by the instrumental

design.

For this method,

a portion of the analytical

range is selected

by choosing

the span of the monitoring

system. The span of the monitoring

system

shall be selected

such that the pollutant

gasconcentration equivalent

to the emission

standard

is not less than 30 percent

of the span. If at any time during a run the measured

gas concentration

exceeds

the span, the run shall be considered invalid. The minimum

detectable

limit depends

on the analytical

range, span, and signal-to- noise ratio of the measurement

system.

For a well designed

system,

the minimum detectable limit should be less than 2 percent

of the span. Span. The upperlimit

of the gas concentration

measurement

range displayed

on the data recorder. Calibration

Gas. A known concentration

of a gas in an appropriate

diluent gas. Analyzer Calibration

Error. The difference

between

the gas concentration

exhibited by the gas analyzer

and the known concentration

of the calibration

gas when the calibration gas is introduced

directly

to the analyzer. Sampling System

Bias. The difference

between

the gas concentrations

exhibited

by the measurement

system

when a known concentration

gas is introduced

at the outlet of the sampling probe and when the same gas is introduced

directly

to the analyzer. Zero Drift. The difference

in the measurement

system

output reading

from the initial calibration response

at the zero concentration

level after a stated period of operation

during which no unscheduled

maintenance,

repair, or adjustment

took place. Calibration Drift. The difference

in the measurement

system

output reading

from the initial calibration

response

at a mid-range

calibration

value after a stated period of operation during which no unscheduled

maintenance,

repair, or adjustment

took place.Response Time. The amount

oftime required

forthe measurement

system

to display 95 percent

of a step change

in gas concentration

on the data recorder. Interference Check.

A method

for detecting

analytical

interferences

and excessive biases through

direct comparison

of gas concentrations

provided

by the measurement system and by a modified

Method

6 procedure.

For this check, the modified

Method

6 samples are acquired

at the sample

by-pass

discharge

vent. ,4 Genera[

The sampling

train consisted

of a sample

probe, heated

sampling

line, calibration valve assembly,

a condenser

to remove

condensate

from the sample

gas while maintaining minimal contact

between

any condensate

and the sample

gas, particulate

filter, sample
pump, sample

flow rate control,

sample

gas manifold,

SO 2 analyzer

(Western

Research

721 ATM serial # 93-721M-7998-3

KEA #1) and a Strata Data Acquisition

System.

The following

measurement

system

performance

specifications

were complied

with during these tests:
1. Analyzer

Calibration

Error Less than + 2% of the span for the zero, mid-range, and high-range

calibration

gases.
2. Sampling

System

Bias Less than + 5% of the span for the zero, and mid- or high-range calibration

gases. L 1Method

6C Determination

of Sulfur Dioxide Emissions

from Stationary

Sources

( Instrumental Analyzer

Procedure),

Code of Federal

Regulations,

Title 40, Section

60, Appendix A, July 1, 2000.3. Zero Drift Less than + 3% of the span over the period of each run. 4. Calibration

Drift Less than + 3% of the span over the period of each run. Measurement System

Preparation

The system

was assembled

by following

the manufacturer's

written

instruction

for preparing and preconditioning

the gas analyzer

and the other system

components.

Various calibration gases were then introduced

and all necessary

adjustments

were made to calibrate the analyzer

and the data recorder.
Then an analyzer

calibration

error check was conducted

by introducing

calibration gases to the measurement

system

at the back of the analyzer

and all measurements

were less than + 2% of the span for any of the calibration

gases.

Next the sampling

system

bias check was conducted

by introducing

calibration

gases at the calibration

valve installed

at the outlet of the sampling

probe. A zero, mid-range,

and high-range

gas were introduced. During this check,

the system

was operated

at the normal

sampling

rate, and no adjustments to the measurement

system

other than those necessary

to achieve

proper calibration gas flow rates to the analyzer

was done. The response

time was determined during this check.

All measurements

were less than + 5% of the span for either the zero

or upscale

calibration

gas. Emission Test Procedure
The probe was positioned

at the sampling

location

and sampling

began at the same rate as used during the system

calibration

drift test. A constant

sampling

rate was maintained during the entire run. The sampling

time per run was 60 minutes,

and data was not collected

until twice the system

response

time had elapsed.

Immediately

following

each
run, the sampling

system

bias check was redone without

making

any adjustments

to the
measurement system.

All values were within acceptable

limits. The average

of the initial and final bias check values were used to calculate

the gas concentration

for the run.

METHOD 3A This method

is appficable

to the determination

of oxygen

(Oz) and carbon

dioxide (CO•) concentrations

in emissions

from stationary

sources

only when specified

within the regulations. A sample

is continuously

extracted

from the effluent

stream:

a portion

of thesample stream is conveyed

to an instrumental

analyzer(s)

for determination

of 02 and C02 • concentration(s). Performance

specifications

and test procedures

are provided

to ensure reliable data. The measurement

system

consists

of the same majorsubsystems

as defined in Method

6C, Sections

3.1.1, 3.1.2, and3.1.3.

Span, Calibration

Gas, AnalyzerCalibration Error, Sampling

System

Bias, Zero Drift, Calibration

Drift, Response

Time, and Calibration Curve. Same as in Method

6C, Sections

3.2 through

3.8, and 3.10/'2 General
The sampling

train consisted

of a sample

probe, heated

sampling

line, calibration valve assembly,

a condenser

to remove

condensate

from the sample

gas while maintaining minimal contact

between

any condensate

and the sample

gas, particulate

filter, sample pump, sample

flow rate control,

sample

gas manifold,

CO2 analyzer

(Fuji CO2 KEA #2 serial #N3A2454T)

and 02 analyzer

(Teledyne

KEA #2 serial # 138493)

and a Strata Data Acquisition System.

The following

measurement

system

performance

specifications

were complied

with during these tests: 1. Analyzer

Calibration

Error Less than + 2% of the span for the zero, mid-range, and high-range

calibration

gases. L 2Method

3A Determination

of Oxygen

and Carbon Dioxide Concentrations

in Emissions from Stationary

Sources

(Instrumental

Analyzer

Procedure),

Code of Federal

Regulations,

Title 40, Section

60, Appendix

A, July 1, 2000.2. Sampling

System

Bias Less than __+ 5% of the span for the zero, and mid- or high-range calibration

gases.
3. Zero Drift Less than _+ 3% of the span over the period of each run. 4. Calibration

Drift Less than + 3% of the span over the period of each run. Measurement System

Preparation

The system

was assembled

by following

the manufacturer's

written

instruction

for preparing and preconditioning

the gas analyzer

and the other system components.

Various calibration gases were then introduced

and all necessary

adjustments

were made to calibrate the analyzer

and the data recorder. ]'hen an analyzer

calibration

error check was conducted

by introducing

calibration gases to the measurement

system

at the back of the analyzer

and all measurements

were less than + 2% of the span for any of the calibration

gases.

Next the sampling

system

bias check was conducted

by introducing

calibration

gases at the calibration

valve installed

at the outlet of the sampling

probe. A zero, mid-range,

and high-range

gas was introduced. During this check,

the system

will be operated

at the normal

sampling

rate, and no adjustments to the measurement

system

other than those necessary

to achieve

proper calibration gas flow rates to the analyzer

was done. The response

time was determined during this check.

All measurements

were less than _+ 5% of the span for either the zero

or upscale

calibration

gas. Emission Test Procedure
The probe was positioned

at the sampling

location

and sampling

began at the same rate as used during the system

calibration

drift test. A constant

sampling

rate was maintained during the entire run. The sampling

data was not be collected

until twice the system response

time had elapsed.

Immediately

following

each hour of testing,

the sampling system

bias check was redone without

making

any adjustments

to themeasurement system.

All values were within acceptable

limits. The average

of the initial and final bias check values were used to calculate

the gas concentration

for the run. The Oxygen data was used to correct the sulfur dioxide

data.
LSTACK BREECHING AND

SAMPLE

POINT

LOCATION

Brick Tunnel

Kiln Stack

119"

540" Traverse Point # Distance from Stack Wall, inches1,9 2 6,5 3 13,0 4 31.6 5 37,5 6 42.t

L Figure

12 KE•AFIELD DATA•'•-aiis#ation Error •st at •5-5•-• S=i-RA•A

V•rsion

210 /' 02

CO2 % % 12-18-2001 07:05:07

7.845

1.779 12-18-2001 07:06:07

1.466

0.092 12-18-2001 07:07:07

1.057

0.085 12-18-2001 07:08:07

0.872

0.08 12-18-2001 07:09:07

0.765

0.078 12-18-2001 07:10:07

0.689

0.081 12-18-2001 07:11:07

0.631

0.081 12-18-2001 07:12:07

0.587

0.077 12-18-2001 07:13:08

0.548

0.076 12-18-2001 07:14:07

0.514

0.073 12-18-2001 07:15:07

0.54

0.079 12-18-2001 07:16:07

16.663

12.957 12-18-2001 07:17:07

22.182

18.007 12-18-2001 07:18:07

22.144

18.007 12-18-2001 07:19:07

13.494

10.83 12-18-2001 07:20:07

12.464

9.9 12-18-2001 07:21:07

12.472

9.88 12-18-2001 07:22:07

1.923

1,358

Calibration Error Test at Run Operator: Tommy Lotz, Plant Name: Location:

02CO2SO2 1

General Shale Louisville, KY Reference Cylinder

Numbers Zero Low-range

Mid-range CC129687 CC52194 CC129687 CC52194 CC52194 SG9'163425

Date/Time 12-18-2001

07:22:51

PASSED Analyte 02

CO2

SO2 Units %

%

ppm Zero Ref Cyl

0

0

0 Zero Avg

0.497

0.075

0.54 Zero Error%

2

0.4

0.4 Low Ref Cyl
Low Avg
Low Error% Mid Ref Cyl

12.1

10.1

46 Mid Avg

12.474

9.897

44.85 Mid Error%

1.5

1

0.9 High Ref Cyl

22

17.8

124 High Avg

22.172

18.015

125.17 High Error%

0.7

1.1

0.9

SO2ppm 231.49109114.57 125.09 125.25 125.26 125.29 125.35 125.18 125.2 125.157.644.484.865.512.480.0832.82

High-range CC 13243 CC 13243 SG9140313

02Volts 0.3138 0.0586 0.0423 0.0349 0.0306 0.0275 0.0253 0.0235 0.0219 0.0206 0.0216 0.6665 0.8873 0.8857 0.5397 0.4985 0.4989 0.0769

CO2Volts 0.0889 0.0046 0.0043 0.004 0.0039 0.004 0.0041 0.0039 0.0038 0.0037 0.0039 0.6479 0.9004 0.9004 0.5415 0.495 0,494 0.0679

SO2Volts 4.6299 2.18 2.2915 2.5017 2,5049 2.5051 2.5058 2.5071 2.5036 2.504 2.5019 1.1527 0.0896 0.0972 0.1101 0.0496 0.0016 0.6564

L'11T•l•ystem t•i• Check tOf Run 1-• S-i RA A v•rsion21U 02 CO2

SO2

02

CO2

SO2 % %

ppm

Volts

Volts

Volts 12-18-2001 07:23:56

5.155

1.348

44.54

0.2062

0.0674

0.8907 12-18-2001 07:24:55

12.649

8.715

63.83

0.506

0.4357

1.2767 12-18-2001 07:25:56

10.524

7.733

39.04

0.4209

0.3866

0.7809 12-18-2001 07:26:56

0.446

0.167

114.05

0.0178

0.0084

2.281 12-18-2001 07:27:56

0.518

0.134

130.78

0.0207

0.0067

2.6156 12-18-2001 07:28:56

1.114

0.362

97.03

0.0446

0.0181

1.9405 12-18-2001 07:29:56

0.335

0.111

69.65

0.0134

0.0056

1.393 12-18-2001 07:30:56

0.314

0.112

67.48

0.0125

0.0056

1.3496 12-18-2001 07:31:56

0.295

0.11

66.22

0.0118

0.0055

1.3244 12-18-2001 07:32:56

0.326

0.112

64.68

0.013

0.0056

1.2937 12-18-2001 07:33:55

0.541

0.153

61.06

0.0216

0.0077

1.2212 12-18-2001 07:34:56

5.304

1.459

46.74

0.2122

0.073

0.9348 12-18-2001 07:35:55

0.242

0.087

46.33

0.0097

0.0044

0.9266 12-18-2001 07:36:56

7.225

5.57

28.98

0.289

0.2785

0.5795 12-18-2001 07:37:56

12.381

9.899

1.6

0.4952

0.4949

0.0321
Initial System Bias Check for Run 1 Operator: Plant Name: Location:

02CO2SO2 Tommy Lotz, Jr. General Shale Louisville, KY Reference Cylinder

Numbers Zero Span CC129687 CC52194 CC129687 CC52194 CC52194 SG9163425
Date/Time 12-18-2001

07:38:13

PASSED Analyte 02

CO2

SO2 Units %

%

ppm Zero Ref Cyl

0

0

0 Zero Cal

0.497

0.075

0.54 Zero Avg

0.264

0.089

1.6 Zero Bias%

0.9

0.1

0.9 Zero Drift% Span RefC

12.1

10.1

46 Span Cal

12.474

9.897

44.85 Span Avg

12.381

9.899

46.39 Span Bias%

0.4

0

1.2 Span Drift%u•

;i Begin. s KAVA version z.O

or: Tommy Lotz, Jr.

ame: General

Shale Location: Louisville,

KY 02

CO2 % % 12-18-2001 07:39:14

13.995

7.102 12-18-2001 07:40:13

16.148

3.721 Begin calculating

run averages 12-18-2001 07:42:01

16.238

3.658 12-18-2001 07:43:01

16.123

3.706 12-18-2001 07:44:01

16.046

3.753 12-18-2001 07:45:01

16.086

3.724 12-18-2001 07:46:01

16.067

3.733 12-18-2001 07:47:01

16.117

3.7 12-18-2001 07:48:00

16.105

3.702 12-18-2001 07:49:01

16.132

3.686 12-18-2001 07:50:00

16.19

3.655 12-18-2001 07:51:01

16.193

3.652 12-18-2001 07:52:01

16.264

3.608 12-18-2001 07:53:01

16.223

3.638 12-18-2001 07:54:01

16.343

3.56 12-18-2001 07:55:01

16.321

3.569 12-18-2001 07:56:01

16.372

3.544 12-18-2001 07:57:00

16.436

3.53 12-18-2001 07:58:01

16.562

3.485 12-18-2001 07:59:00

16.695

3.403 12-18-2001 08:00:01

16.689

3.401 12-18-2001 08:01:01

16.758

3.361 12-18-2001 08:02:01

16.928

3.24 12-18-2001 08:03:01

17.148

3.058 12-18-2001 08:04:01

16.962

3.222 12-18-2001 08:05:01

16.779

3.336 12-18-2001 08:06:00

16.307

3.636 12-18-2001 08:07:01

16.55

3.42 12-18-2001 08:08:00

16.503

3.443 12-18-2001 08:09:01

16.533

3.428 12-18-2001 08:10:01

16.462

3.468 12-18-2001 08:11:01

16.545

3.41 12-18-2001 08:12:01

16.472

3.452 12-18-2001 08:13:01

16.611

3.399 12-18-2001 08:14:01

16.535

3.433 12-18-2001 08:15:00

16.509

3.441 12-18-2001 08:16:01

16.571

3.418 12-18-2001 08:17:00

16.584

3.415 12-18-2001 08:18:01

16.775

3.31 12-18-2001 08:19:01

16.702

3.36 12-18-2001 08:20:01

16.746

3.359 12-18-2001 08:21:01

16.659

3.415 12-18-2001 08:22:01

16.678

3.41 12-18-2001 08:23:01

16.673

3.413 08:24:00 16.738

3.368 2-18-2001 08:25:01

16.69

3.357 18-2001 08:26:00

16.544

3.439

SO2ppm18.62 72.36

54.07 38.59 39.17 40.2437.25 32.66 31.26 29.28 27.48 28.43 28.83 29.18 28.69 26.69 26.75 29.3131.133.59 32.9131.3124.8915.4111.97 11.39 10.34 14.67 14.35 t4.84 17.16 19.46 20.74 22.7820.89 25.83 30.5134.27 33.07 35.55 48.8551.3155.76 45.56 44.98 36.64 26.19

02Volts 0.5598 0.6459

0.6495 0.6449 0.6419 0.6434 0.6427 0.6447 0.6442 0.6453 0.6476 0.6477 0.6506 0.6489 0.6537 0.6528 0.6549 0.6575 0.6625 0.6678 0.6676 0.6703 0.6771 0.6859 0.6785 0.6711 0.6523 0.662 0.6601 0.6613 0.6585 0.6618 0.6589 0.6644 0.6614 0.6604 0.6628 0.6634 0.671 0.6681 0.6698 0.6664 0.6671 0.6669 0.6695 0.6676 0.6618

CO2Volts 0.3551 0.1861

0.1829 0.1853 0.1876 0.1862 0.1867 0.185 0.1851 0.1843 0.1827 0.1826 0.1804 0.1819 0.178 0.1785 0.1772 0.1765 0.1743 0.1702 0.170.168 0.162 0.1529 0.1611 0.1668 0.1818 0.171 0.1721 0.1714 0.1734 0.1705 0.1726 0.1699 0.1716 0.172 0.1709 0.1707 0.1655 0.168 0.1679 0.1707 0.1705 0.1706 0.1684 0.1679 0.1719

S02Volts 0.3724 1.4472

1.0814 0.7718 0.7835 0.8049 0.745 0.6531 0.6251 0.5856 0.5496 0.5686 0.5766 0.5837 0.5737 0.5339 0.5349 0.5862 0.622 0.6717 0.6581 0.6262 0.4979 0.3082 0.2393 0.2277 0.2068 0.2933 0.287 0.2968 0.3431 0.3892 0.4147 0.4555 0.4179 0.5167 0.6103 0.6854 0.6615 0.711 0.9769 1.0263 1.1152 0.9112 0.8997 0.7328 0.5238/,'d'2•

•-zUO•

u•:2/:O'l 12-18-2001 08:28:01 12-18-2001 08:29:01 12-18-2001 08:30:01 12-18-2001 08:31:01 12-18-2001 08:32:01 12-18-2001 08:33:01 12-18-2001 08:34:01 12-18-2001 08:35:00 12-18-2001 08:36:01 12-18-2001 08:37:00 12-18-2001 08:38:01 12-18-2001 08:39:01 12-18-2001 08:40:01 12-18-2001 08:41:01 Average of Test Run

12-18-2001 08:41:01 Test Run 1 End

16.62

3.391

25.32

0.6648

0.1696

0.5063 16.564 3,43

24.24

0.6626

0.1715

0,4848 16,659 3.371

25.08

0.6664

0.1686

0.5016 16.618 3.392

25.2

0.6647

0.1696

0.5039 16.625 3.394

24.35

0.665

0.1697

0.4871 16.676 3.365

22,73

0.667

0,1682

0.4545 16.669 3.361

25.08

0.6668

0.1681

0,5015 16.777 3.308

25.64

0.6711

0.1654

0.5128 16.682 3.372

24.99

0.6673

0.1686

0.4998 16.786 3.316

26,78

0.6714

0.1658

0.5356 16,749 3.335

28.95

0.67

0.1667

0.579 16,794 3.31

32,01

0.6718

0.1655

0.6403 16.787 3.316

29.6

0.6715

0,1658

0.5919 16.957 3.236

35.53

0.6783

0.1618

0.7105 17.029 3.189

36,23

0.6812

0.1595

0.7246 02 CO2

SO2

02

CO2

SO2 % %

ppm

%

%

ppm 16.553 3,447

29.27

0.6621

0.1723

0.5853•e• •as L;ne(;t• Tor t•un 1 S HA I2• ve•ibn

2i0 02 CO2

SO2

02 % %

ppm

Volts 12-18-2001 08:42:02

5.274

1.11

38.23

0.211 12-18-2001 08:43:01

0.125

0.107

46.15

0.005 12-18-2001 08:44:02

6.542

4.919

31.05

0.2617 12-18-2001 08:45:02

12.284

9.867

1.32

0.4913

Final System Bias Check for Run Operator: Tommy Lotz, Jr. Plant Name: General

Shale Location: Louisville,

KY

02CO2SO2 Reference

Cylinder

Numbers Zero Span CC129687 CC52194 CC129687 CC52194 CC52194 SG9163425

Date/Time 12-18-2001

08:45:37

PASSED Analyte 02

CO2

SO2 Units %

%

ppm Zero Ref Cyl

0

0

0 Zero Cal

0.497

0.075

0.54 Zero Avg

0.133

0.109

1.2 Zero Bias%

1.5

0.2

0.5 Zero Drift%

-0.5

0.1

-0.3 Span Ref C 12. t

10.1

46 Span Cal

12.474

9.897

44.85 Span Avg

12.289

9.874

46.1 Span Bias%

0.7

0.1

1 Span Drift%

-0.4

-0.1

-0.2

Ini Zero Avg

0.264

0.089

1.6 Ini Span Av 12.381

9.899

46.39 Run Avg

16.553

3.447

29.27 Co 0.198

0.099

1.4 Cm 12.335

9.887

46.25 Correct Avg 16.305

3.454

28.58 CO2Volts 0.0555 0.0054 0.2459 0.4934

SO2Volts 0.7645 0.9229 0.6209 0.0265b K/4 •AVerston

z.0 ommy Lotz, Jr. eneral Shale Location: Louisville,

KY 02% 12-18-2001 08:46:37

14.658 12-18-2001 08:47:37

16.914 Begin calculating

run averages 12-18-2001 08:49:01

16.802 12-18-2001 08:50:02

16.874 12-18-2001 08:51:01

16.803 12-18-2001 08:52:02

16.927 12-18-2001 08:53:01

16.891 12-18-2001 08:54:02

16,94 12-18-2001 08:55:01

16.913 12-18-2001 08:56:02

16.921 12-18-2001 08:57:01

16.957 12-18-2001 08:58:01

16.886 12-18-2001 08:59:02

16.974 12-18-2001 09:00:01

16.915 12-18-2001 09:01:02

17.013 12-18-2001 09:02:01

17.002 12-18-2001 09:03:02

17.174 12-18-2001 09:04:01

t7.215 12-18-2001 09:05:02

17.138 12-18-2001 09:06:01

17.181 12-18-2001 09:07:01

17.107 12-18-2001 09:08:02

17.2 12-18-2001 09:09:01

17.189 12-18-2001 09:10:02

17.173 12-18-2001 09:11:01

17.033 12-18-2001 09:12:02

17.032 12-18-2001 09:13:01

17.049 12-18-2001 09:14:02

17.004 12-18-2001 09:15:01

17.071 12-18-2001 09:16:01

17.004 12-18-2001 09:17:02

17.105 12-18-2001 09:18:01

17.008 12-18-2001 09:19:02

17.072 12-18-2001 09:20:01

17.072 12-18-2001 09:21:02

17.074 12-18-2001 09:22:01

17.109 12-18-2001 09:23:02

17.023 12-18-2001 09:24:01

17.105 12-18-2001 09:25:01

17.164 12-18-2001 09:26:02

17.266 12-18-2001 09:27:01

17.176 12-18-2001 09:28:02

17.219 12-18-2001 09:29:01

17.236 12-18-2001 09:30:02

17.2 112-18-2001 09:31:01

17.282 2-18-2001 09:32:02

17.416 •4•-18-2001 09:33:01

17.607

CO2%6.656 3.282

3.346 3.309 3.366 3.295 3.307 3.2873.33.2943.275 3.324 3.2713.297 3.233 3.2583.173.133.189 3.172 3.224 3.167 3.167 3.142 3.227 3.226 3.2153.243.203 3.234 3.168 3.237 3.196 3.189 3.189 3.163 3.219 3.162 3.149 3.089 3.159 3.1363.123.143 3.0922.988 2.823

SO2ppm12.44 21.57

15.88 17.35 18.19 18.3618.619.69 21.66 24.19 25.9131.15 31.29 32.37 29.79 29.21 42.54 46.62 52.22 59.22 67.59 72.52 75.4761.853.93 57.73 54.99 42.34 33.57 30.1328.625.78 25.49 21.7121.552020.31 20.28 19.45 20.35 20.67 23.97 27.0631.732.18 28.67 16.09

02Volts 0.5863 0.6766

0.6721 0.675 0.6721 0.6771 0.6756 0.6776 0.6765 0.6769 0.6783 0.6755 0.6789 0.6766 0.6805 0.6801 0.687 0.6886 0.6855 0.6873 0.6843 0.688 0.6875 0.6869 0.6813 0.6813 0.682 0.6802 0.6828 0.6802 0.6842 0.6803 0.6829 0.6829 0,683 0.6844 0.6809 0.6842 0.6865 0.6906 0.6871 0,6887 0.6894 0.688 0.6913 0.6966 0.7043

C02Volts 0.3328 0.1641

0.1673 0.1655 0.1683 0.1648 0.1653 0.1643 0.165 0.1647 0.1637 0.1662 0.1636 0.1648 0.1617 0.1629 0.1585 0.1565 0.1595 0.1586 0,1612 0.1584 0.1583 0.1571 0.1613 0.1613 0.1608 0.162 0.1602 0.1617 0.1584 0.1618 0.1598 0.1595 0.1595 0.1581 0.161 0.1581 0.1574 0.1545 0.158 0.1568 0.156 0.1572 0.1546 0.1494 0.1412

SO2Volts 0.2488 0.4315

0.3177 0.3471 0.3637 0.3673 0.372 0.3937 0.4333 0.4838 0.5182 0.6231 0.6258 0.6474 0.5958 0.5842 0.8508 0.9325 1.0445 1.1844 1.3519 1.4504 1.5094 1.2361 1.0785 1.1545 1.0998 0.8468 0.6715 0.6026 0.572 0.5156 0.5099 0.4342 0.4311 0.3999 0.4061 0.4056 0.3891 0.4069 0.4133 0.4793 0.5411 0.6339 0.6437 0.5733 0.3218
1.812-18-2001 09:35:02

17.294 12-18-2001 09:36:01

17.076 12-18-2001 09:37:02

17.222 12-18-2001 09:38:01

17.23 12-18-2001 09:39:02

17.273 12-18-2001 09:40:01

17.233 12-18-2001 09:41:02

17.323 12-18-2001 09:42:01

17.236 12-18-2001 09:43:01

17.343 12-18-2001 09:44:01

17.262 12-18-2001 09:45:01

17.3 12-18-2001 09:46:02

17.333 12-18-2001 09:47:02

17.399 12-18-2001 09:48:01

17.458 Average of Test Run

02% 12-18-2001 09:48:01

17.132 Test Run 2 End z.UUl

;i0:56

U.I•UI515

U. 1495••.

2•-••- 3.057 10.06

0.6918

0.1529

0.2012 3.184 13.66

0.683

0.1592

0.2733 3.053 18.82

0.6889

0.1527

0.3764 3.048 21.49

0.6892

O. 1524

0.4298 3.02 23.8

0.6909

0.151

0.4761 3.045 27.57

0.6893

0.1522

0.5513 2.988 33.41

0.6929

0.1494

0.6681 3.044 35.3

0.6894

0.1522

0.7061 2.976 27.02

0.6937

0.1488

0.5404 3.023 27.65

0.6905

0.1512

0.5529 3 15.12

0.692

0.15

0.3024 2.978 15.73

0.6933

0.1489

0.3145 2.968 20.56

0.696

0.1484

0.4112 2.946 28

0.6983

0.1473

0,5601 C02 SO2

02

C02

S02 % ppm

%

%

ppm 3.157 30.28

0.6853

0.1578

0.6056

L,,,,'F'inai

SyStem

•as L;neck tot Run 2.

% ,12-18-2001 09:49:02

6.615 12-18-2001 09:50:01

0.105 12-18-2001 09:51:02

7.288 12-18-2001 09:52:02

12.245 STl•AiAVersi6n

210 CO2 SO2

02

CO2

SO2 % ppm

Volts

Volts

Volts 1.273 36.87

0.2646

0.0637

0.7374 0.124 46.01

0.0042

0.0062

0.9202 5.561 27.61

0.2915

0.2781

0.5521 9.893 1.1

0.4898

0.4946

0.0221
Final System Bias Check for Run 2 Operator: Plant Name: Location:

02CO2SO2

Tommy Lotz, Jr. General Shale Louisville, KY Reference Cylinder

Numbers Zero Span CC129687 CC52194 CC129687 CC52194 CC52194 SG9163425
Date/Time 12-18-2001

09:52:24

PASSED Analyte 02

CO2

SO2 Units %

%

ppm Zero Ref Cyl

0

0

0 Zero Cal

0.497

0.075

0.54 Zero Avg

0.134

0.13

1.06 Zero Bias%

1.5

0.3

0.4 Zero Drift%

0

0.1

-0.1 Span Ref Cyl

12.1

10.1

46 Span Cal

12.474

9.897

44.85 Span Avg

12.247

9.894

45.96 Span Bias%

0.9

0

0.9 Span Drift%

-0.2

0.1

-0.1

Ini Zero Avg

0.133

0.109

1.2 Ini Span Avg

12.289

9.874

46.1 Run Avg

17.132

3.157

30.28 Co 0.133

0.119

1.13 Cm 12.268

9.884

46.03 Correct Avg

16.95

3.142

29.86

L

20 ::EAb{un

3 •egm. • HA • version 2:0 Operator: Tommy Lotz, Jr. Plant Name: General

Shale Location: Louisville,

KY

12-18-2001 09:53:25 12-18-2001 09:54:24 Begin calculating

run averages

02%15.152 17.289

12-18-2001 09:56:01

17.236 12-18-2001 09:57:02

17.317 12-18-2001 09:58:01

17.23 12-18-2001 09:59:02

17.293 12-18-2001 10:00:01

17.25 12-18-2001 10:01:01

17.273 12-18-2001 10:02:01

17.288 12-18-2001 10:03:01

17.238 12-18-2001 10:04:01

17.285 12-18-2001 10:05:01

17.217 12-18-2001 10:06:02

17.273 12-18-2001 10:07:01

17.255 12-18-2001 10:08:02

17.229 12-18-2001 10:09:01

17.212 12-18-2001 10:10:01

17.214 12-18-2001 10:11:01

17.26 12-18-2001 10:12:01

17.217 12-18-2001 10:13:01

17.124 12-18-2001 10:14:01

17.005 12-18-2001 10:15:01

17.058 12-18-2001 10:16:01

17.004 12-18-2001 10:17:02

17.04 12-18-2001 10:18:01

17.043 12-18-2001 10:19:01

17.005 12-18-2001 10:20:01

17 12-18-2001 10:21:01

16.906 12-18-2001 10:22:01

16.998 12-18-2001 10:23:01

16.955 12-18-2001 10:24:01

17.013 12-18-2001 10:25:01

16.972 12-18-2001 10:26:02

17.041 12-18-2001 10:27:01

17.172 12-18-2001 10:28:02

17.072 12-18-2001 10:29:01

17.152 12-18-2001 10:30:01

17.11 12-18-2001 10:31:01

17.178 12-18-2001 10:32:01

17.211 12-18-2001 10:33:01

17.081 12-18-2001 10:34:01

17.053 12-18-2001 10:35:02

17.028 12-18-200:1 10:36:01

17.069 12-18-2001 10:37:02

17.005 10:38:01 17.083 2-18-2001 10:39:01

17.049 18-2001 10:40:01

17.093

C02%5.982 3.034

3.05533.056 3.022 3.042 3.027 3.016 3.047 3.012 3.048 3.023 3.066 3.097 3.105 3.1033.073.082 3.117 3.187 3.1613.197 3.173 3.168 3.196 3.192 3.2443.213.246 3.212 3.2413.204 3.1413.215 3.1813.204 3.168 3.123 3.178 3.196 3.208 3.175 3.213 3.166 3.1763.15

SO2ppm16.5239.4

49.67 52.39 56.86 63.49 65.926970.35 77.43 80.3981.78394.15 101.26 104.53 103.46 97.6895.477.469.49 63.17 56.86 52.66 47.38 38.33 28.23 24.29 21.73 17.27 15.18 13.02 10.919.749.178.788.438.589.3110.210.55 10.79 11.28 11.05 10.73 10.239.2

02Volts 0.6061 0.6916

0.6894 0.6927 0.6892 0.6917 0.69 0.6909 0.6915 0.6895 0.6914 0.6887 0.6909 0.6902 0.6891 0.6885 0.6886 0.6904 0.6887 0.685 0.6802 0.6823 0.6802 0.6816 0.6817 0.6802 0.68 0.6762 0.6799 0.6782 0.6805 0.6789 0.6816 0.6869 0.6829 0.6861 0.6844 0.6871 0.6885 0.6833 0.6821 0.6811 0.6828 0.6802 0.6833 0.682 0.6837

CO2Volts 0.2991 0.1517

0.1527 0.15 0.1528 0.1511 0.1521 0.1514 0.1508 0.1523 0.1506 0.1524 0.1512 0.1533 0.1549 0.1552 0.1551 0.1535 0.1541 0.1559 0.1594 0.1581 0.1598 0.1587 0.1584 0.1598 0.1596 0.1622 0.1605 0.1623 0.t606 0.162 0.1602 0.1571 0.1608 0.159 0.1602 0.1584 0.1561 0.1589 0.1598 0.1604 0.1588 0.1607 0.1583 0.1588 0.1575

S02Volts 0.3304 0.788

0.9933 1.0478 1.1372 1.2699 1.31841.381.407 1.5485 1.6077 1.6341.661.883 2.0251 2.0906 2.0692 1.9535 1.908 1.548 1.3898 1.2634 1.1373 1.0531 0.9476 0.7667 0.5646 0.4857 0.4346 0.3454 0.3O36 0.2604 0.2183 0.1947 0.1834 0.1755 0.1686 0.1715 0.1863 0.2041 0.211 0.2158 0.2257 0.2211 0.2146 0.2046 0.183912-18-2001 10:42:01 12-18-2001 10:43:01 12-18-2001 10:44:02 12-18-2001 10:45:01 12-18-2001 10:46:02 12-18-2001 10:47:01 12-18-2001 10:48:01 12-18-2001 10:49:01 12-18-2001 10:50:01 12-18-2001 10:51:01 12-18-2001 10:52:01 12-18-2001 10:53:02 12-18-2001 10:54:01 12-18-200t 10:55:02 Average of Test Run

12-18-2001 10:55:02 Test Run 3 End

1/.u•b

3.15•

8••18

0.6826 17.085 3.156

7.17

0.6834

0.1578

0.1433 17.117 3.127

6.62

0.6847

0.1563

0.1325 17.078 3.154

6.2

0.6831

0.1577

0.1239 17.14 3.116

5.58

0.6856

0.1558

0.1115 17.078 3.157

5.01

0.6831

0.1578

0.1002 17.22 3.095

4.49

0.6888

0.1547

0.0898 17.178 3.113

4.21

0.6871

0.1556

0.0842 17.21 3.089

3.99

0.6884

0.1545

0.0798 17.168 3.086

3.72

0.6867

0.1543

0.0743 17.15 3.095

3.63

0.686

0.1548

0.0726 17.431 2.905

3.61

0.6972

0.1452

0.0722 17.449 2.848

3.66

0.698

0.1424

0.0731 17.309 2,981

3.46

0.6924

0.149

0.0692 17.149 3.083

3.31

0.686

0.1541

0.0661 02 CO2

SO2

02

CO2

SO2 % %

ppm

%

%

ppm 17.144 3.121

34.89

0.6858

0.1561

0.6977

L

22.•y•tem bias une•K tor Run 3.02

C02

S02ppm % % •12-18-2001 10:56:02

9.681

2.019

14.17 12-18-2001 10:57:02

0.113

0.133

46.06 12-18-2001 10:58:02

0.083

0.129

46.39 12-18-2001 10:59:02

1.815

1.239

44.94 12-18-2001 11:00:02

12.167

9.896

4.76

02Volts 0.3872 0.0045 0.0033 0.0726 0.4867

Final System Bias Check for Run 3 Operator: Tommy Lotz, Jr. Plant Name:

General

Shale Location: Louisville,

KY Reference Cylinder

Numbers Zero Span 02 CC129887

CC52194 CO2 CC129687

CC52194 SO2 CC52194

SG9'163425

Date/Time 12-18-2001

11:00:52 Analyte 02

CO2 Units %

% Zero Ref Cyl

0

0 Zero Cal

0.497

0.075 Zero Avg

0.083

0.128 Zero Bias%

1.7

0.3 Zero Drift%

-0.2

0 Span Ref Cyl

12.1

10.1 Span Cal

12.474

9.897 Span Avg

12.222

9.922 Span Bias%

1

0.1 Span Drift%

-0.1

0.1

PASSEDSO2ppm00.541.320.60.24644.85 46.381.20.3

Ini Zero Avg

0.134

0.13

1.06 Ini Span Avg

12.247

9.894

45.96 Run Avg

17.144

3.121

34.89 Co 0.108

0.129

1.19 Cm 12.234

9.908

46.17 Correct Avg

16.999

3.091

34.46 C02Volts 0.1009 0.0066 0.0064 0.062 0.4948

SO2Volts O.2834 0.9212 0.9277 0.8988 0.0952,'•un

averages

Corrected

foi perator: Tommy Lotz, Jr. Plant Name: General

Shale Location

Run Louisville,

KY 02 CO2

SO2 % %

ppm 1 16.305

3.454

28.58 2 16.95

3.142

29.86 3 16.999

3.091

34.46

LNOMENCLATURE FOR

SULFUR

DIOX•DE

Cgas

CCo

maMWSO2 PPH
385.1 x 106
= Conversion

factor = Effluent

gas concentration,

dry basis, ppm

= Average

gas concentration

indicated

by gas analyzer,

dry basis,

ppm

= Average

of initial and final system

calibration

bias check responses

for the zero gas, ppm

= Average

of initial and final system

calibration

bias check responses

for the upscale

calibration

gas, ppm Actual concentration

of the upscale

calibration

gas, ppm Molecular weight of SO2, which is equal to 64.07 Sulfur dioxide

mass rate in pounds

per hour

EQUATIONS FOR

SO2

C gas

= (C-Co•,,)

x (Cn•a), / (Cm Co)

L SO 2 #/DSCF

Cgas X MW / 385.1 x 10 6

= ( ,;,!•,bb

) x (64.07)/(385.1

x 106)

=

SO 2 Gr/DSCF

= SO2 #/DSCF

x 7000

SO2 Gr/100DSCF

= SO 2 GR/DSCF

x 100

= ( • .--'-> •> •!.> ) x ( ••NOMENCLATURE FOR

OXYGEN/CARBON DIOXIDE

Cgas

CCo

Cm

Cma = Effluent

gas concentration,

dry basis, ppm

= Average

gas concentration

indicated

by gas analyzer,

dry basis, ppm

= Average

of initial and final system

calibration

bias check responses

for the zero gas, ppm

= Average

of initial and final system

calibration

bias check responses

for the upscale

calibration

gas, ppm

= Actual concentration

of the upscale

calibration

gas, ppm

EQUATIONS FOR

C gas

(C-C 0)x (Cma) /(C

m C0) :/<'.."

o, ,,t Ix(

•, )/( :::-;;,•:•,

)=

LPLANT PRODUC DATA TiONQNQC PROCEDURES AN D

RES

U LTS6. QA/QC

PROCEDURES AND

RESULTS Specific quality

assurance/quality

control

procedures

were adhered

to during this test project to provide

valid and scientifically-defensible data. For any environmental

field and laboratory measurement,

a degree

of uncertainty

exists in the data due to inherent limitations of the measurement

systems

employed.

The objective

of a QA/QC

program

is to produce

data of known

precision,

accuracy,

representativeness, completeness

and comparability. The objective

in this test project

was to determine

compliance

with applicable air permit requirements.

The final data user in this project will be the PA Dept. of Environmental

Protection,

Bureau

of Air Quality.

PROCEDURES FOR SAMPLING The following

sections

detail all QC procedures

followed

during the manual

sampling
activities.

CONTINUOUS EMISSION

MONITORING

QC PROCEDURES

In accordance

with EPA Methods

3A and 6C a three-point

(i.e., zero, mid-, and high-range) analyzer calibration

error check was conducted

on each reference

analyzer

prior to initiating

the compliance

testing.

These checks were conducted

(after final calibration

adjustments

are made) by injecting

the calibration

gases directly

into each gas analyzer

and recording

the responses.

The reference

calibration

gases used in this test program

are certified following EPA Protocol

Number

1 analysis.

Copies

of the calibration

gas certifications

are included in this section

Zero and upscale

calibration

checks were performed

both before and after each test run in
order to quantify

reference

measurement

system calibration

drift and sampling

system

bias. Upscale is either the mid- or high-range

gas, whichever

most closely approximates

the flue
gas level. During these checks,

the calibration

gases are introduced

into the sampling system at the probe outlet so that they are analyzed

in the same manner

as the flue gas samples. Drift is defined

as the difference

between

the pre- and post-test

run calibration check responses.

Sampling

system

bias is the difference

between

the test run calibration
check responses

(system

calibration)

and the initial calibration

error responses

(direct analyzer calibration)

to the zero and upscale

calibration

gases.

If an acceptable

post-test
bias check result is obtained,

but the zero or upscale

drift result exceeds

the drift limit, then
the test run result is valid; however,

the analyzer

calibration

error and bias checkprocedures must be repeated

before conducting

the next test run. A run is considered invalid and must be repeated

if the post-test

zero or upscale

calibration

check result exceeds the bias specification.

The calibration

error and bias checks must be repeated

and acceptable results obtained

before testing can resume.Re•earch TrianS•e Paf!i N,C, 2,7709 phone 919/.•44-372'2

CERT•FICATE OF ANALY$18:

EPA PROTOCOL

GAS •XTURE,

,: :,

ANALy•!••

Carbon Dioxide 10.1% Nitrogen

NC TA Type•'SRM Sample # C__.•l.tnder # •. GMt8 CC13313 24,824 %

O2,'N2

GMI8 C061376 19,36 %

CO2JN2

•j.N.STR UM ENTA T I.O_N_N

Beckman 7,•5 O2

001419

Rosemount 880 CO2 00418

Last Date Gallb..LaJ, e• 04/08/01
04/02/01

Analytic:el

M,,mhc•d Paramagnetio Non-Elispersive n Fra

laboratory. Every error has been made to determine

o•je•tfvely

the ormation requested.

However,

in connection wi• •i• report, Natlonat 8psoialty

Gases shall have no liability in excess of estabtisl•ed

•,atge for this service. Assayecl at National 8penalty Gases, 630 United Drive, Dumam, NC 27713 (919• 544-3772

'*AnzlylJoet a•ow=•*/ir•.4ude•

• Kr•,'n •tt•¢ •our¢.• which, at {•, h•lu• px'eei•o• of •he analyti• n•lr•me•.

I•$G g2C

.32Oxygen •t. 1%
Carbon Dioxide •7.8%

E•eckman 755 02

001419

Rosamount 880 CQ2 00418 131/04J01
01/0•Ol P aramagnetic Non.d;spers•ve

infrared

laborato•. Eve• efto• ha• #sen made tO d•ermine

o•i•ly

the info•ation

r•ueSte•,

However,

this sewi¢¢, A•aye0 • Natlona• 8peciaRy

G•s•, 630 Unit• O• c, Dumam, NC 27713 (919• 544-3772