alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

: CIVIL ACTION NOS.

:

ELKINS : 02-1527

GRANT : 02-1943

MURPHY : 02-3866

RENER : 02-3870

JACKSON : 02-3900

MARUSHI, et al. : 02-3914

MORRIS : 02-3953

FORTNER : 02-3961

MACHALA : 02-3984

RAMIREZ, et al. : 02-4114

THEODORAN : 02-4123

STOPHER : 02-4147

COPENHAVER, et al. : 02-4187

PERERA : 02-4205

BERUMEN, et al. : 02-4238

RISLEY, et al. : 02-4246

MONTGOMERY, et al. : 02-4280

MILLER, et al. : 02-4281

DUBOIS : 02-4317

EDUVALA, et al. : 02-4327

:

VS. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION, et al. :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of July, 2002, the Court having been previously

advised that the above action cannot proceed to trial and disposition because of the following

reason:

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending disposition of a related

action.

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending determination of

arbitration proceedings.

[ ] - Interlocutory appeal filed.

Case 2:02-cv-04238-AB Document 2 Filed 07/17/2002 Page 1 of 2
[ X ] - Other: Case is placed into suspense pending receipt of the Case

Transfer Order from the Judicial Panel on Multi District Litigation

transferring case to District of Minnesota.

It is

ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this action closed for statistical purposes and

place the matter in the Civil Suspense File, and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction; and that the case be

restored to the trial docket when the action is in a status so that it may proceed to final

disposition; this order shall not prejudice the rights of the parties to this litigation.

BY THE COURT:

________________________________________

Anita B. Brody, Judge

Case 2:02-cv-04238-AB Document 2 Filed 07/17/2002 Page 2 of 2
# DATA Act Monthly Reporting

# GTAS Reporting Window

# Program Activity Schedule
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 95-10108 USDC No. 5:94-CV-237-C

__________________ WILLIAM BRYAN FROUST, Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus UNIDENTIFIED CRIBBS ET AL., Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

-------------------- July 21, 1995 Before DAVIS, SMITH and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges. BY THE COURT: Because process had not issued and no defendant had filed an answer, William Bryan Froust had the right to dismiss the instant suit voluntarily without prejudice. F ED . R. C IV . P. 41(a). Therefore, Froust's motion to appeal IFP is GRANTED. Jackson v. Dallas Police Dep't , 811 F.2d 260, 261 (5th Cir. 1986). The order of dismissal is MODIFIED to reflect that the suit is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED. The appeal is DISMISSED AS MOOT.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1336 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1336

  To amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to reauthorize hydroelectric 
    production incentives and hydroelectric efficiency improvement 
                  incentives, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                             June 12, 2017

  Mr. Gardner introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To amend the Energy Policy Act of 2005 to reauthorize hydroelectric 
    production incentives and hydroelectric efficiency improvement 
                  incentives, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Reliable Investment in Vital Energy 
Reauthorization Act'' or the ``RIVER Act''.

SEC. 2. HYDROELECTRIC PRODUCTION INCENTIVES AND EFFICIENCY 
              IMPROVEMENTS.

    (a) Hydroelectric Production Incentives.--Section 242 of the Energy 
Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 15881) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (c), by striking ``10'' and inserting 
        ``20'';
            (2) in subsection (f), by striking ``20'' and inserting 
        ``30''; and
            (3) in subsection (g), by striking ``each of the fiscal 
        years 2006 through 2015'' and inserting ``each of fiscal years 
        2018 through 2027''.
    (b) Hydroelectric Efficiency Improvement.--Section 243(c) of the 
Energy Policy Act of 2005 (42 U.S.C. 15882(c)) is amended by striking 
``each of the fiscal years 2006 through 2015'' and inserting ``each of 
fiscal years 2018 through 2027''.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2017112EN.01003601.xml

| 10.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/36

---

Order of the General Court of 9 February 2017 — Dröge and Others v Commission

(Case T-142/16) (1)

1

((Action for annulment - Declaration of intent and two Commission decisions on the arrangements for accessing documents concerning the negotiations on a transatlantic trade and investment partnership between the European Union and the United States (TTIP) - Right of access of staff of members of national parliaments to certain confidential documents relating to the TTIP negotiations - Measures against which no action may be brought - Inadmissibility))

(2017/C 112/49)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Katharina Dröge (Berlin, Germany), Britta Haßelmann (Berlin), Anton Hofreiter (Berlin) (represented by: Professor W. Cremer)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: F. Erlbacher, R. Vidal Puig and B. Hartmann, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU seeking (i) annulment of the Commission’s declaration of intent concerning the conclusion of a treaty binding on the contracting parties — the European Union and the United States of America — as regards the arrangements for accessing documents concerning the negotiations on a transatlantic trade and investment partnership (TTIP), and, in the alternative, a declaration that it is contrary to EU law; (ii) annulment of the Commission’s prior decision concerning the submission of the aforementioned declaration of intent on the authorisation of the agreement and (iii) annulment of the Commission’s oral decision connected with the conclusion of a treaty or a non-binding political agreement with the United States of America on the ‘TTIP access regime’ and classifying that regime as binding under EU law, in so far as it strictly prohibits members of the parliaments of the Member States from being accompanied by vetted staff, including staff of their political group, when viewing documents relating to the TTIP in reading rooms established for that purpose.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | Katharina Dröge, Britta Haßelmann and Anton Hofreiter are ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Katharina Dröge, Britta Haßelmann and Anton Hofreiter are ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 221, 13.6.2016.

1

---
# C_2021252EN.01003602.xml

| 28.6.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 252/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.6.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 252/36

---

Order of the General Court of 30 April 2021 — Aycinena and Others v Commission

(Case T-537/16) (1)

(2021/C 252/52)

Language of the case: French

The President of the Eighth Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 89, 16.3.2015 (case originally registered before the European Union Civil Service Tribunal under number F-14/15 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1.9.2016).

---
Case 2:05-cv-00112-PBT Document 11 Filed 02/14/05 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
IN RE: DIET DRUGS (PHENTERMINE/

FENFLURAMINE / DEXFENFLURAMINE — :
PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION) : MDL DOCKET NO. 1203

THIS ORDER RELATES TO THE
LAW OFFICE OF BOBBY MOAK CASES
LISTED ON EXHIBITS A & B

PRETRIAL ORDER NO.

AND NOW TO WIT: This day of 2006 it having

been advised that all claims between all the parties in the cases listed on Exhibits A and B
have been settled, and upon Order of the Court pursuant to Rule 41.1(b) of the Local
Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court, it is hereby:

ORDERED that, pursuant to agreement of counsel, the actions listed on
Exhibit A and B, including any and all claims, counterclaims, cross-claims and third

party claims therein are DISMISSED with prejudice and without costs as to all parties.

MICHAEL E. KUNZ, Clerk of Court

BY: s/Ronald Vance
Ronald Vance
Deputy Clerk


Law Office of Bobby Moak

EXHIBIT A

MDL Piaintiffs
Single Plaintiff Cases
8/21/2006
# {Plaintiff's Name _ MDL Case # Transferor Court
1 Brady, Lois P. 04-27282 MSS
2 Landry, Sandra 04-27295 MSS

Page 1 of 1



EXHIBIT B

Law Office of Bobby Moak
MDL Plaintiffs
Multiple Plaintiff Cases
8/21/2006

# | __ Plaintiff's Name Case Name. | MDL Case # | Transferor Court
1 Day, Frances Bell, Gaither 03-20584 MSN
2 Hosey, Robin Broom, Margie 03-20587 MSN
3 Bishop, Lisa Bishop, Lisa 03-20601 MSS.
4 Boyle, Tammy Bishop, Lisa 03-20601 MSS.

Wade, Andira, correctly |Bishop, Lisa 03-20601 MSS
5 identified on complaint

as Wade, Andria
6 Hewitt, Sherrie Boutte, Mary 04-26964 LAM
7 Savell, Anne Savell, Anne 04-29908 LAM
8 Smith, Darlene Savell, Anne 04-29908 LAM
9 Day, Karen Armstrong, Sandra 05-20174 TNW.
10 |Brown, Sandra Phillips, Linda Kay Waldrup | 05-20540 MSN
11 Evans, Vickie Phillips, Linda Kay Waldrup | _05-20540 MSN
12 Hughes, Renee Phillips, Linda Kay Waldrup | _05-20540 MSN
13 |Lea, Bobbie Phillips, Linda Kay Waldrup | _05-20540 MSN
14 ___|Middieton, Cathy Phillips, Linda Kay Waldrup | _05-20540 MSN
15 |Shaffers, Theodore Anderson, Wanda 05-20542 MSS
16 |Brown, Michael Angel, Lisa 05-20543 GAM
17 __|Harrod, Jessica Angel, Lisa 05-20543 GAM
18 Ezeff, Cariette Battiste, Thane 05-20549 LAM
19 [Waish, Shawn Martin, Lorraine, 05-20608 LAE
20 __j|Hamilton, Kimberly Bishop, Betty 05-20609 LAE
21 Martin, Elizabeth Bishop, Betty 05-20609 LAE

Page 1 of 1
# C_2017078EN.01003202.xml

| 13.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 78/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 78/32

---

Order of the General Court of 26 January 2017 — European Social Enterprise Law Association v EUIPO (EUROPEAN SOCIAL ENTERPRISE LAW ASSOCIATION)

(Case T-353/16) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Representation of the applicant by a lawyer who is not a third party - Inadmissibility))

(2017/C 078/45)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Social Enterprise Law Association (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: L. Fletcher, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: L. Rampini, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 April 2016 (Case R 2208/2015-4), concerning an application for registration of the word sign EUROPEAN SOCIAL ENTERPRISE LAW ASSOCIATION as an EU trade mark.

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The action is dismissed as inadmissible. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The action is dismissed as inadmissible.

| 2. | The European Social Enterprise Law Association shall pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

The European Social Enterprise Law Association shall pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 314, 29.8.2016.

1

---
Exhibit 10.5





		 September 3, 2019 To:PaulBudsworth From: Mark Burgess, CEO Subject: New Severance Terms Dear Paul, As you may recall, following the split from Sealed Air, you were deemed a participant eligible to receive severance benefits under the Diversey Enhanced Severance Plan. This Plan expires on September 6, 2019, which means that following that date, the Plan will no longer govern (1) your employment with Diversey and (2) any severance benefits you may have resulting from your employment with Diversey. Following the Plan expiration, however, you will be eligible for the following severance terms: In the event your employment ends for a reason other than for cause (not due to death or disability) or your resignation, then subject to your timely execution and non"revocation of a release of claims, the provisions of reasonable transition services and compliance with restrictive covenants (which include but are not limited to non-competition and non solicitation agreements), you will receive severance in the amount equal to the sum of your then current base salary and target annual Incentive to be paid in ratable installments over the 12"month period following the end of your employment. Please note, this letter shall solely govern any severance benefit to which you would be entitled as a result of your employment with Diversey. Thus, any Company severance practice or policy in effect at the end of your employment shall not govern any severance benefit to which you would be entitled. Should you have any questions related to this letter, please contact Michael Kriner in Human Resources. Sincerely, Mark Burgess, CEO CC:Annette Bergknut, Chief Human Resources Officer Employee Personnel Fiie
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 32

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                    SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      I, John F. Burke, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of
Annuity and Life Re (Holdings), Ltd. (the "Company"), hereby certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that (1) the Form 10-Q of the Company for the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2003 (the "Form 10-Q"), fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
(15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and (2) the information contained in the Form 10-Q
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.


Date: August 14, 2003


/s/ John F. Burke
-----------------
Name:  John F. Burke,
Title:  Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Financial Officer




NS
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 24

- 00526

- CV

In re Nathaniel Lee Thompson and Nate L. Thompson, Inc. d/b/a Triumphant Transition Partners

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Relators Nathaniel Lee Thompson and Nate L. Thompson, Inc. d/b/a Triumphant

Transition Partners have filed a petition for writ of mandamus and emergency motion for

temporary stay. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.1, 52.10(a). The petition for writ of mandamus and

emergency motion for stay are denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

_______________________ ___________________ Edward Smith, Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Smith and Theofanis

Filed: August 16, 2024
DEPARTMENT OF 

ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION 

18 AAC 50 

AIR QUALITY CONTROL 

Public Review Draft 

 

December 29, 2008 

Sarah Palin 

Governor 

Larry Hartig 

Commissioner 
Register ____, ________ 2009 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION 

18 AAC 50.030 is amended to read: 

18 AAC 50.030. State air quality control plan. Volumes II and III of the State Air 

Quality Control Plan for implementing and enforcing the provisions of AS 46.14 and this 

chapter, as amended through {adoption date of these regulations}[APRIL 4, 2008], are adopted 

by reference. The plan includes the following documents which are also adopted by reference: 

(Eff. 1/18/97, Register 141; am 6/21/98, Register 146; am 9/4/98, Register 147; 

am 1/1/2000; Register 152; am 12/30/2000; Register 156; am 9/21/2001, Register 159; am 

1/27/2002, Register 161; am 3/2/2002, Register 161; am 5/3/2002, Register 162; am 2/20/2004, 

Register 169; am 6/24/2004, Register 170; am 10/1/2004, Register 171; am 12/14/2006, Register 

180; am 12/30/2007, Register 184; am 5/17/2008, Register 186; am 7/25/2008, Register 187; am 

__/__/____, Register ___) 

Authority: AS 46.03.020 AS 46.14.030 Sec. 30, ch. 74, SLA 1993 

AS 46.14.020 AS 46.14.140

18 AAC 50.030(2) is amended to read: 

(2) the Code of the City and Borough of Juneau, Alaska, Chapter 36.40.40

[CHAPTER 36.40], amended by the provisions of Ordinance of the City and Borough of Juneau, 

Alaska, Serial No. 2008-08, § 2, 9-8-2008 [91-52]; 

(Eff. 1/18/97, Register 141; am 6/21/98, Register 146; am 9/4/98, Register 147; 

am 1/1/2000; Register 152; am 12/30/2000; Register 156; am 9/21/2001, Register 159; am 

1/27/2002, Register 161; am 3/2/2002, Register 161; am 5/3/2002, Register 162; am 2/20/2004, 
Register ____, ________ 2009 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION 

Register 169; am 6/24/2004, Register 170; am 10/1/2004, Register 171; am 12/14/2006, Register 

180; am 12/30/2007, Register 184; am 5/17/2008, Register 186; am 7/25/2008, Register 187; am 

__/__/____, Register ___ 

Authority: AS 46.03.020 AS 46.14.030 Sec. 30, ch. 74, SLA 1993 

AS 46.14.020 AS 46.14.140
EXHIBIT 31.1
 CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Belk, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange
Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
 a.
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;b.
    
    Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused
such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our
supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;c.
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andd.
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 a.
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely
to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; andb.
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting.
  /s/ Thomas M. Belk, Jr.
# C_2017144EN.01003902.xml

| 8.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 144/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 144/39

---

Judgment of the General Court of 14 March 2017 — Wessel-Werk v EUIPO — Wolf PVG (Suction nozzles for vacuum cleaners)

(Case T-175/16) (1)

1

((Community design - Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity - Registered Community design representing a suction nozzle for a vacuum cleaner - Earlier Community design - Ground for invalidity - Individual character - Informed user - Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002))

(2017/C 144/52)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Wessel-Werk GmbH (Reichshof, Germany) (represented by: C. Becker, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Schifko, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Wolf PVG GmbH & Co. KG (Vlotho, Germany) (represented by: J. Künzel, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 18 February 2016 (Case R 1725/2014-3), as rectified, relating to proceedings for a declaration of invalidity between Wolf PVG and Wessel-Werk.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Wessel-Werk GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Wessel-Werk GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 211, 13.6.2016.

1

---
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order
Lansing, Michigan

December 11, 2008 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
Michael F. Cavanag h Elizabeth A. Weave r Marilyn Kell y 133887(57) Maura D. Corriga n Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, J ustices

BUDGET RENT-A-CAR SYSTEM, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, SC: 133887

v COA: 271703

CITY OF DETROIT a nd DETROIT POLICE Wayne CC: 05-501303-NI

DEPARTMENT, Defendants-Appellants.

___________________ ___________________

On order of the Chief Justice, the motions by the Michig an Association for Justice and the Coalition Protecting Auto No-Fault fo r leave to file briefs amicus curiae are considered and they are GRANTED.

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

December 11, 2008
Clerk
No. 51328.

#### Protests 99351-K, etc., of Adamo Co. et al. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The protests were dismissed.