alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF CHASTAIN CAPITAL CORPORATION FOR THE PERIOD ENDED JUNE
30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                      22,515,940
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             1,094,964
<PP&E>                                       3,678,345
<DEPRECIATION>                                   5,255
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             127,455,082
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        2,068,294
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        89,808
<OTHER-SE>                                 124,829,826
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               127,455,082
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             1,345,990
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,679
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             1,278,101
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                102,636
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            102,636
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   102,636
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CRIMINAL ACTION

:

v. :

:

RASAN TOWNSEND : NO. 05-51

ORDER

AND NOW, this 10 day of December, 2010, upon th

consideration of defendant’s Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or

Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody (Docket No. 52),

the government’s opposition, and the defendant’s reply thereto,

and for the reasons stated in a memorandum of law bearing today’s

date, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the defendant’s motion is DENIED

without a hearing. This Court finds that the defendant has

failed to make a substantial showing of a denial of any

constitutional right and accordingly that a certificate of

appealability will be denied.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Mary A. McLaughlin__

MARY A. McLAUGHLIN, J.
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS48153 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
Exhibit 23.2

October 28, 2005

Board of Directors
On The Go Healthcare, Inc.
85 Corstate Avenue
Unit #1
Concord, Ontario
L4K 4Y2

Dear Sirs:

This letter is to constitute our consent to include the audit report of On The
Go Healthcare, Inc. as of July 31, 2003 in the Registration Statement filed
on Form 10-KSB contemporaneously herewith and subject to any required
amendments thereto.


Yours very truly,

/s/Rosenberg Smith & Partners
-----------------------------
Rosenberg Smith & Partners
Chartered Accountants
Concord, Ontario

<PAGE>
# C_2015371EN.01003701.xml

| 9.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 371/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 371/37

---

Action brought on 8 September 2015 — Intesa Sanpaolo v OHIM (START UP INITIATIVE)

(Case T-529/15)

(2015/C 371/38)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Intesa Sanpaolo SpA (Turin (TO), Italy) (represented by: P. Pozzi and F. Braga, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word elements ‘START UP INITIATIVE’ — Application for registration No 13 011 838

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 29 June 2015 in Case R 2777/2014-1

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare that there was a breach and incorrect application of Article 7(1)(b) and (2) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that there was a breach and incorrect application of Article 7(1)(b) and (2) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | declare that there was a breach of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that there was a breach of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs and fees incurred for the present proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs and fees incurred for the present proceedings.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (2) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (2) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EDMUND V. LUDWIG 12614 United States Courthouse

 Judge Independence Mall West

 Philadelphia, PA 19106-1775

(215) 580-2030

(215) 580-2142 FAX

NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT

RE: Philadelphia 76ers L.P. v. Trustmark Insurance Company, et al.

CIVIL ACTION NO. 04-cv-4972-EL

Oral argument on outstanding motions will be held on Tuesday, December 7,

2004 at 11:00 a.m in Courtroom 12-A.

See attached standing order on oral argument.

Very truly yours,

 Kathryne M. Crispell

Deputy Clerk to Judge Ludwig

DATE: December 2, 2004

Copies to:

LAWRENCE D. JACKSON (by E-Mail and Fax)

ljackson@cozen.com

STEPHEN C. BAKER (by E-Mail and Fax)

stephen.baker@dbr.com

STEPHEN A. COZEN (by Fax)

ROBERT J. KHEEL (by Fax)

JEFFREY A. MISHKIN (by Fax)

JEFFREY A. ROSENTHAL (by Fax)

Case 2:04-cv-04972-EL Document 8 Filed 12/02/2004 Page 1 of 2

PHILADELPHIA 76ERS L.P. v. TRUSTMARK INSURANCE COMPANY et al Doc. 8

Dockets.Justia.com
SOP on Oral Argument

 Judge Ludwig 

1. Each party shall have 15 minutes to present argument unless more time is

allocated. A portion of time may be reserved for rebuttal.

2. The parties shall submit a joint summary of the issues and their arguments by

Monday, December 6, 2004 at noon. Ordinarily, a summary of the issues and of each

party's argument should be set forth on a separate page.

Judge Edmund V. Ludwig

(SO-OA - 1-90; 11-95)

Case 2:04-cv-04972-EL Document 8 Filed 12/02/2004 Page 2 of 2
CERTIFICATION PRSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARABANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2003

In connection with the Quarterly report of Rosedale Decorative Products, Ltd.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Alan Fine, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
         15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.



/s/ SIDNEY ACKERMAN
-------------------
    Sidney Ackerman
    President

December 14, 2004
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

We, Ricardo Puente, Chief Executive Officer and Joan M. Fiorito, Chief Financial
Officer of TransWestern Publishing Company LLC (the "Company"), certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, that:

(1)      the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly
         period ended March 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the
         requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
         of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Dated May 8, 2003
                                                         /s/ Ricardo Puente
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Ricardo Puente
                                                         Chief Executive Officer

                                                         /s/ Joan M. Fiorito
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Joan M. Fiorito
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
No. 57948.

protest 219203-K (New York).

#### Rudy Patrick Seed Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of *Lotus corniculatus*seeds similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Transcontinental Seed, Inc. (Alltransport, Incorporated)*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 163, C. D. 1462), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# C_2017309EN.01001501.xml

| 18.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 309/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.9.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 309/15

---

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 26 July 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Administrativo e Fiscal de Coimbra — Portugal) — Superfoz — Supermercados Lda v Fazenda Pública

(Case C-519/16) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Approximation of laws - Regulation (EC) No 882/2004 - Official controls of feed and food - Funding of official controls - Articles 26 and 27 - General taxation - Fees or charges - Charge on retail food outlets))

(2017/C 309/20)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal Administrativo e Fiscal de Coimbra

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Superfoz — Supermercados Lda

Applicant:

Defendant: Fazenda Pública

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 26 and 27 of Regulation No 882/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on official controls performed to ensure the verification of compliance with feed and food law, animal health and animal welfare rules, as amended by Regulation (EU) No 652/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014, must be interpreted as not precluding the imposition of a charge, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, on retail food outlets only, where the revenue from that charge is not used specifically to finance official controls that have been caused by, or that are for the benefit of, those chargeable persons.

---

(1)  OJ C 6, 9.1.2017.

1

---
**Home > Farmington      RMP/ROD/FEIS     
     
**Farmington                            Resource Management Plan with Record of Decision  December 2003**
- Final                              RMP/ROD
- Errata                              Sheet
- Appendix                              A - Summary of Authorizing Actions
- Appendix                              B - R&PP Locations
- Appendix                              C - Cereza-Crow Wildlife SDAs
- Appendix                              C - East La Plata-Ensenada Wildlife SDAs
- Appendix                              C - Geo-Paleo SDAs
- Appendix                              C - Middle-Rattlesname-Rosa Wildlife SDAs
- Appendix                              C - Recreation & Riparian SDAs
- Appendix                              C - Wildlife Gonzales-Laguna SDAs
- Appendix                              C - TE & Wilderness SDAs
- Appendix                              C - TOC & Cultural SDAs
- Appendix                              D - Land Use Plan Decisions
- Appendix                              E - OHV Management

Adobe Acrobat                          Reader is required to view these documents. Download Acrobat                        Reader for free

 

 

**Record                                of Decision  September 2003**
- Record                                of Decision PDF | HTML

Adobe Acrobat                            Reader is required to view these documents. Download Acrobat                            Reader for free

Specially                              Designated Areas (SDA) Under the Final 2003 Resource                        Management Plan 

**Farmington                            Proposed Resource Management Plan and Final Environmental                            Impact Statement  March 2003**

**Volume I**
- Chapter                              1    Purpose and Need
- Chapter                              2    Continuing Management Guidance and Alternatives
- Chapter                              3    Affected Environment
- Chapters                              4-5    Environmental Consequences    Consultation and Coordination
- Tables                              2-5Management Prescriptions for Specially Managed Areas
- Glossary,                              References, Index

**Volume II**
- Appendix                              A-G
- Appendix                              H-M
- Appendix                              N
- Appendix                              O-P

**Maps**
- Map                              2-4Specially Designated Areas Under Alternative A
- Map                              2-8Specially Designated Areas and Mineral Interests                          Under Alternative B
- Map                              2-10Specially Designated Areas Under Alternative C
- Map                              2-11Specially Designated Areas Under Alternative D

Oil                            and Gas Resource Development for the San Juan Basin,                            New Mexico (30.5MB)

Adobe Acrobat                          Reader is required to view these documents. Download Acrobat                        Reader for free

 

 

**
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MICHAEL A. COLEMAN : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. :

:

THE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, :

et al. : NO. 02-4102

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of April, 2003, upon

consideration of plaintiff's Motion to Cure or Waiver of Defects

(Doc. #4) whereby plaintiff seeks to transfer this action, IT IS

HEREBY ORDERED that said motion is DENIED. 

Plaintiff's complaint was dismissed without prejudice

to present his claims in the Western District of Pennsylvania

where the alleged events for which plaintiff seeks compensation

occurred and where jurisdiction over the defendants he seeks to

enjoin may be obtained. A court may not transfer a case once it

has been dismissed.

BY THE COURT:

____________________

JAMES T. GILES, C.J.

Case 2:02-cv-04102-JG Document 7 Filed 04/07/2003 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1200 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1200

 To require that certain prevailing wage determinations be made using 
             representative statistical sample techniques.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 22, 2017

   Mr. Flake introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To require that certain prevailing wage determinations be made using 
             representative statistical sample techniques.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Opportunity in Federal Construction 
Act''.

SEC. 2. WAGE DETERMINATIONS.

    (a) In General.--Section 3142(b) of title 40, United States Code, 
is amended--
            (1) by inserting ``, acting through the Bureau of Labor 
        Statistics,'' after ``Secretary of Labor''; and
            (2) by inserting before the period at the end the 
        following: ``, using surveys carried out by the Bureau of Labor 
        Statistics that use proper representative statistical sampling 
        techniques''.
    (b) Rulemaking.--The Secretary of Labor shall issue regulations to 
carry out the amendments made by subsection (a).

SEC. 3. GAO REPORT.

    (a) Study.--Not later than one year after the effective date of the 
regulations issued pursuant to section 2(b), the Comptroller General of 
the United States shall commence a study of the implementation of such 
regulations.
    (b) Report.--The Comptroller General shall submit a report to 
Congress containing the results of the study described in subsection 
(a).
                                 <all>
```
# C_2018142EN.01000902.xml

| 23.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 142/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 142/9

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 28 February 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Berlin — Germany) — Trinseo Deutschland Anlagengesellschaft mbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland

(Case C-577/16) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Environment - Scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the European Union - Directive 2003/87/EC - Scope - Article 2(1) - Annex I - Activities subject to the trading scheme - Production of polymers - Use of heat supplied by a third-party installation - Application for free allocation of emission allowances - Period 2013-2020))

(2018/C 142/13)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Verwaltungsgericht Berlin

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Trinseo Deutschland Anlagengesellschaft mbH

Applicant:

Defendant: Bundesrepublik Deutschland

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 2(1) of Directive 2003/87/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 October 2003 establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community and amending Council Directive 96/61/EC, as amended by Directive 2009/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009, must be interpreted as meaning that an installation for the production of polymers, in particular the polymer polycarbonate, such as the installation at issue in the main proceedings, which obtains the heat needed for that production from a third-party installation, does not fall within the scope of the greenhouse gas emission allowance trading scheme established by that directive, since it does not generate direct CO2 emissions.

---

(1)  OJ C 63, 27.2.2017.

1

---
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. 

United States Court of Appeals 

for the Federal Circuit ______________________ 

RUTHERFORD CONTROLS INT’L CORP., a 

Canadian Corporation and RUTHERFORD 

CONTROLS INT’L CORP., a Virginia Corporation,

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

v. 

VANGUARD SECURITY ENGINEERING CORP., 

LTD., 

Defendant, 

and 

SECURITY DOOR CONTROLS, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee. 

____________________ 

2010-1113 

______________________

 

 Appeal from the United States District Court for the 

Eastern District of Virginia in No. 08-CV-0369, Judge 

Henry E. Judson. 

______________________ 

JUDGMENT 

______________________ 

WILLIAM C. BERGMANN, Baker & Hostetler LLP, of 

Washington, DC, argued for plaintiffs-appellants. With 

him on the brief were MARK H. TIDMAN and A. NEAL SETH. 

STEPHEN E. NOONA, Kaufman & Canoles, P.C., of 

Norfolk, Virginia, argued for defendant-appellee. Of 

counsel on the brief was JAYE G. HEYBL, Koppel, Patrick, 

Heybl & Dawson, of Westlake Village, California. 

______________________ 
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is 

ORDERED and ADJUDGED: 

 PER CURIAM (PROST, MAYER, and SCHALL, Circuit 

Judges). 

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36. 

 ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

 July 14, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly

 Date Jan Horbaly 

 Clerk
^m^m>mmm«^^m^¥^m^^^»^m^mm.

Order issued March 11, 1998

In The

©surf of Appeals

mtttj Btstrtrt at Q^xas at lallas

No. 05-96-00631-CV

PRESTON OAKS CROSSING CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., Appellant

PRESTON OAKS CROSSING JOINT VENTURE,, Appellee

ORDER

Appellees Preston Oaks Crossing Joint Venture's, Dondi Residential Properties,

Inc.'s, Dondi Development Corporation's and Dondi Group, Inc.'s December 29, 1997

motion for leave to file a letter briefis GRANTED and the letter brief is considered filed

as of that date.

ED KINKEADE

JUSTICE
# C_2019305EN.01003701.xml

| 9.9.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 305/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.9.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 305/37

---

Judgment of the General Court of 19 June 2019 — L’Oréal v EUIPO — Guinot (MASTER SHAPE)

(Case T-180/16 RENV) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark MASTER SHAPE - Earlier national figurative mark MASTERS COLORS PARIS - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(2019/C 305/44)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: L’Oréal (Paris, France) (represented by: T. de Haan and P. Péters, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Hanf, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Guinot (Paris, France) (represented by: A. Sion, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 February 2016 (Case R 2907/2014-5) relating to opposition proceedings between Guinot and L’Oréal.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders L’Oréal to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders L’Oréal to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 222, 20.6.2016.

---
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****The U.S. Air Service in WorldWar I**
 
Volumes: One | Two | Three | Four
 
SuDoc Number:D 301.82/2:V.1-4
Item Number:0422-M (online)
CGP systemNumber:001051998
 
April 5, 2018