alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

KARAM ELIAS

,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

State

. §

§

§

§

§

§

§

'

' No. 08

- 1 5

- 00 057

- CR

Appeal from the

County Criminal Court No. 1

o f El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20100C07299 )

O R D E R

The Court GRANTS the State ’s third motion for extension of time to file the brief until

October 7

, 201 5

. NO FURTHER MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE THE

STATE ’S BRIEF WILL BE CONSIDERED BY THIS COURT.

It is further ORDERED that the Hon. J o Anne Bernal, the State ’s Attor ney, prepare the

State ’s brief and forward the same to this Court on or before October 7 , 201 5

.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 3 rd day of September , 201 5

.

PER CURIAM

Before McClure, C.J., Rodriguez, and Hughes, JJ.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

LARRY and DARLENE CHRISTIANSON :

: CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-CV-4287

Plaintiffs, :

:

v. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION;

BAYER AG;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE;

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM

:

:

:

:

:

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

:

Defendants. :

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of the Court:

Kindly enter the appearances of Hope S. Freiwald, Aline Fairweather, Erin

Brennan and Kirstin J. Miller as attorneys for defendant SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a

GlaxoSmithKline.

Respectfully Submitted,

_____________________________ _____________________________

Hope S. Freiwald Aline Fairweather

_____________________________ _____________________________

Erin Brennan Kirstin J. Miller

DECHERT PRICE & RHOADS

4000 Bell Atlantic Tower

1717 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2793

(215) 994-4000

Case 2:02-cv-04287-JK Document 7 Filed 09/16/2002 Page 1 of 1
# C_2017283EN.01004001.xml

| 28.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 283/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 283/40

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 July 2017 — Migros-Genossenschafts-Bund v EUIPO — Luigi Lavazza (CReMESPRESSO)

(Case T-189/16) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU figurative mark CReMESPRESSO - Earlier international word mark CREMESSO - Allusive element - Interdependence of criteria - Likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2017/C 283/60)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Migros-Genossenschafts-Bund (Zürich, Switzerland) (represented by: M. Treis, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: H. O’Neill and I. Moisescu, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Luigi Lavazza SpA (Turin, Italy) (represented by: M. Ricolfi and F. Tarocco, lawyers)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 23 February 2016 (Case R 2823/2014-4) relating to invalidity proceedings between Migros-Genossenschafts-Bund and Luigi Lavazza.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 23 February 2016 (Case R 2823/2014-4), in so far as the Board of Appeal upheld the action brought by Luigi Lavazza SpA and partially annulled the decision of the Cancellation Division with respect to the following goods: ‘Electric ice crushers’ and ‘Ice cream makers, ice cream machines, but also coffee machines’ in Classes 7 and 11, covered by the mark at issue; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 23 February 2016 (Case R 2823/2014-4), in so far as the Board of Appeal upheld the action brought by Luigi Lavazza SpA and partially annulled the decision of the Cancellation Division with respect to the following goods: ‘Electric ice crushers’ and ‘Ice cream makers, ice cream machines, but also coffee machines’ in Classes 7 and 11, covered by the mark at issue;

| 2. | Orders EUIPO and Luigi Lavazza to bear, in addition to their own costs, those incurred by Migros-Genossenschafts-Bund. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders EUIPO and Luigi Lavazza to bear, in addition to their own costs, those incurred by Migros-Genossenschafts-Bund.

---

(1)  OJ C 232, 27.6.2016.

1

---
No. 59452.

protest 270258-K (New York).

#### J. C. Siegelman Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of cotton velveteen twill-back cloth, having a length of staple of the cotton contained therein of under 1% inches, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Case 2:04-cv-06003-RBS Document 4 Filed 03/02/2005 Page 1 of 19

MCLAUGHLIN v. PHILADELPHIA PHILLIES Doc. 4

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:04-cv-06003-RBS Document 4 Filed 03/02/2005 Page 2 of 19
Case 2:04-cv-06003-RBS Document 4 Filed 03/02/2005 Page 3 of 19
Case 2:04-cv-06003-RBS Document 4 Filed 03/02/2005 Page 4 of 19
Case 2:04-cv-06003-RBS Document 4 Filed 03/02/2005 Page 5 of 19
Case 2:04-cv-06003-RBS Document 4 Filed 03/02/2005 Page 6 of 19
Case 2:04-cv-06003-RBS Document 4 Filed 03/02/2005 Page 7 of 19
Case 2:04-cv-06003-RBS Document 4 Filed 03/02/2005 Page 8 of 19
Case 2:04-cv-06003-RBS Document 4 Filed 03/02/2005 Page 9 of 19
Case 2:04-cv-06003-RBS Document 4 Filed 03/02/2005 Page 10 of 19
Case 2:04-cv-06003-RBS Document 4 Filed 03/02/2005 Page 11 of 19
Case 2:04-cv-06003-RBS Document 4 Filed 03/02/2005 Page 12 of 19
Case 2:04-cv-06003-RBS Document 4 Filed 03/02/2005 Page 13 of 19
Case 2:04-cv-06003-RBS Document 4 Filed 03/02/2005 Page 14 of 19
Case 2:04-cv-06003-RBS Document 4 Filed 03/02/2005 Page 15 of 19
Case 2:04-cv-06003-RBS Document 4 Filed 03/02/2005 Page 16 of 19
Case 2:04-cv-06003-RBS Document 4 Filed 03/02/2005 Page 17 of 19
Case 2:04-cv-06003-RBS Document 4 Filed 03/02/2005 Page 18 of 19
Case 2:04-cv-06003-RBS Document 4 Filed 03/02/2005 Page 19 of 19
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-51079

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

TYRICE HEGWOOD, also known as Tyrece Hedgemond,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 3:09-CR-3143-12

Before KING, JOLLY, and GRAVES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Tyrice Hegwood presents arguments that are foreclosed by United States

v. Tickles, 661 F.3d 212, 214-15 (5th Cir. 2011), which held that the Fair

Sentencing Act of 2010 (FSA) does not apply retroactively to a defendant who is

sentenced after the effective date of the FSA but whose offense preceded the

FSA’s effective date. The Government has moved for summary affirmance, or

for an extension of time to file a brief. 

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

F I L E D

January 26, 2012

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not *

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

Case: 10-51079 Document: 00511737305 Page: 1 Date Filed: 01/26/2012
No. 10-51079

The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the

judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. The Government’s alternative

motion for an extension of time to file a brief is DENIED. 

2

Case: 10-51079 Document: 00511737305 Page: 2 Date Filed: 01/26/2012
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 38 Filed 02/26/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 38 Filed 02/26/2007 Page 2 of 2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 21-0255

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

CARL SANGREY,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT

Pursuant to authority granted under Mont. R. App. P. 26(1), the 

Appellant is given an extension of time until February 6, 2023, to 

prepare, file, and serve the Appellant’s reply brief.

No further extensions will be granted.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

January 5 2023

01/05/2023

Case Number: DA 21-0255
EXHIBIT 31
                                                                      ----------

                                 CERTIFICATIONS

I, Charles W. Jepson, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Extended Systems
     Incorporated;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.   I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
     procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
     the registrant and have:

     (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
          disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
          supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
          registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
          us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
          which this report is being prepared;

     (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
          effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
          of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
          most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is
          reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting; and

5.   I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control
     over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
     committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
     equivalent functions):

     (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
          operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
          reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          control over financial reporting.


/s/ CHARLES W. JEPSON
---------------------------
Charles W. Jepson
Chief Executive Officer and
 Acting Chief Financial Officer
November 14, 2003
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002





In connection
with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Integrated Healthcare Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended
June 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"),
the undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(i) the
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(ii) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company at the dates and for the period indicated.



This Certificate
has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the Securities and Exchange Commission.





|                       | INTEGRATED HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS, INC |                        
|---------------------- | ----------------------------------- | -----------------------
|                       |                                     |                        
|Dated: August 10, 2012 | By:                                 | /s/ Steven R. Blake    
|                       |                                     | Steven R. Blake        
|                       |                                     | Chief Financial Officer
|                       |                                     |
# C_2016211EN.01003601.xml

| 13.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 211/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 211/36

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État (Belgium) lodged on 11 April 2016 — État belge v Max-Manuel Nianga

(Case C-199/16)

(2016/C 211/46)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Conseil d’État

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: État belge

Defendant: Max-Manuel Nianga

Question referred

Is Article 5 of Directive 2008/115/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals, read in conjunction with Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union and having regard to the right to be heard in any proceedings, which forms an integral part of respect for the rights of the defence, a general principle of EU law, as applied in the context of that directive, (1) to be interpreted as requiring national authorities to take account of the best interests of the child, family life and the state of health of the third-country national concerned when issuing a return decision, referred to in Article 3(4) and Article 6(1) of the directive, or a removal decision, as provided for in Article 3(5) and Article 8 of the directive?

---

(1)  OJ 2008 L 348, p. 98.

---
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Cavalcade of Sports Media,
Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31,
2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Edward Litwak, President and Acting Chief
Financial Officer , certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.



/s/ Edward  Litwak
-----------------------------
Edward  Litwak
President and Acting Chief Financial Officer
May 7, 2003



/s/ Donald Parson
Donald Parson, Director
May 7, 2003



/s/ Robert Stulman
Robert Stulman, Secretary
May 7, 2003
FS Form 000089 Department of the Treasury | Bureau of the Fiscal Service Revision January 2022

BUREAU OF THE FISCAL SERVICE

DIGITAL ACCESS REQUEST

SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED 

ACCOUNT ACTION REQUESTED

I request Digital Access, with MEDIUM level of assurance, be Issued, Updated, or Revoked by the Bureau of the Fiscal Service to the 

nominee named below. (CHOOSE ONE)

New Subscriber Subscriber Update (Description Required) Subscriber Revocation

*FPA ID(s): Description:

NOMINATION TYPE

The individual below is nominated to access Fiscal Service Digital Payment Systems as a: (CHOOSE ONE)

Trusted Enrollment Agent

Requires Nomination from Designating Official

Certifying Officer

Requires Valid FS 210CO

Data Entry Operator

Requires Valid FS 210DEO

NOMINEE INFORMATION

*First Name Middle Name *Last Name Suffix (Sr., Jr., III, etc.)

*Organizational Name (Agency/Bureau) *Work Email Address

Organization Address (include street, room # and/or mail stop, city, state and zip) *Work Phone Number

Nominee Signature and Date

I certify that the information, statements and representations provided by me on this form are true and accurate to the best of my 

knowledge. I understand that a willfully false certification is a criminal offense and is punishable by law (18 U.S.C. 1001).

NOMINATING OFFICIAL INFORMATION

Trusted Enrollment Agent (TEA) Designating Official Fiscal Service Approver

*First Name Middle Name *Last Name Suffix (Sr., Jr., III, etc.)

*Organizational Name (Agency/Bureau) *Work Email Address

*Work Phone Number

Nominating Official Signature and Date

I certify that the information, statements and representations provided on this form are true and accurate to the best of my knowledge. 

I understand that a willfully false certification is a criminal offense and is punishable by law (18 U.S.C. 1001).

POINT OF CONTACT (POC) OR GROUP EMAIL INFORMATION

Point of Contact (POC) or Group Email will receive expiration notifications.

Full Name (if applicable) Individual or Group Email Address Phone Number

FISCAL SERVICE APPROVER - SIGNATURE AND DATE

All required fields are marked with an asterisk (*) and must be completed, in order for Fiscal Service to process the form.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 17**  **- 6067** 

ALBERT C. BURGESS, JR ., Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina , at Asheville
. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. ( 1:09

- cr - 00017

- GCM

- DLH

- 1 ; 1:16

- cv - 00410

- GCM )

Submitted : March 14, 2017 Decided: March 17, 2017

Before FLOYD and HARRIS, Circuit Judges , and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Albert Charles Burgess, Jr. , Appellant Pro Se. Kimlani M. Ford , Cortney Randall , Edward R. Ryan , Assistant United States Attorneys, Charlotte, North Carolina, Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assist ant United States Attorney, Asheville , North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Albert Charles Burgess, Jr. , seeks to appeal the district court’s order dismissing as successive his 2 8 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) motion. * The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a ce rtificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the den ial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constit utional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositiv e procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85.

* Burgess filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 1651 (2012). The district court construed the petitio n as a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 challenging the 2010 criminal judgment entered following Burgess ’ convictions under 18 U.S.C. § 2252(a) (2012). On appeal, Burgess does not dispute that his filing chall enged the 2010 criminal judgment.3 We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Burgess has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealabil ity and dismiss the appeal.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argume nt would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WHIZKIDS CREATIONS CO., :

Plaintiff, :

:

 v. : 02-CV-4358

: 

C.B.S, Inc., and :

COLUMBIA BROADCASTING :

SERVICES, Inc., :

Defendants. :

ORDER

AND NOW, this day of August, 2002, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff's

Motion to Grant Relief with Defendants Out of Time (Docket Entry # 6) is DENIED.

 

ANITA B. BRODY, J. 

 Copies FAXED on _______ to: Copies MAILED on _______ to:

Case 2:02-cv-04358-AB Document 7 Filed 08/30/2002 Page 1 of 1
ID 

Union Calendar No. 326 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 140 

[Report No. 115–441] 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 11, 2017 

Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources 

DECEMBER 6, 2017 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union 

and ordered to be printed 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 140 RH

A BILL 

To amend the White Mountain Apache Tribe Water Rights 

Quantification Act of 2010 to clarify the use of amounts 

in the WMAT Settlement Fund. 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 140 RH

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. USE OF FUNDS IN WMAT SETTLEMENT FUND 

4 FOR WMAT RURAL WATER SYSTEM. 

5 (a) AUTHORIZATION OF WMAT RURAL WATER SYS6 TEM.—Section 307(a) of the White Mountain Apache 

7 Tribe Water Rights Quantification Act of 2010 (Public 

8 Law 111–291; 124 Stat. 3080) is amended in the matter 

9 preceding paragraph (1) by inserting ‘‘, (b)(2),’’ after 

10 ‘‘subsections (a)’’. 

11 (b) FUNDING.—Section 312(b)(2)(C)(i)(III) of the 

12 White Mountain Apache Tribe Water Rights Quantifica13 tion Act of 2010 (Public Law 111–291; 124 Stat. 3093) 

14 is amended by striking the period at the end and inserting 

15 the following: ‘‘, including the planning, design, and con16 struction of the WMAT rural water system, in accordance 

17 with section 307(a).’’. 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
Union Calendar No. 326 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 140 

[Report No. 115–441] 

A BILL 

To amend the White Mountain Apache Tribe Water 

use of amounts in the WMAT Settlement Fund. Rights Quantification Act of 2010 to clarify the 

DECEMBER 6, 2017 

Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the 

State of the Union and ordered to be printed 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS