alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11

                      ANNUITY AND LIFE RE (HOLDINGS), LTD.

            STATEMENT OF COMPUTATION OF NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE
                                   UNAUDITED
         (EXPRESSED IN UNITED STATES DOLLARS EXCEPT FOR SHARE AMOUNTS)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                                  THREE MONTHS ENDED
                                                                      MARCH 31,
                                                              --------------------------
                                                                 2000           1999
                                                              -----------    -----------
<S>                                                           <C>            <C>
Net Income..................................................  $ 7,813,768    $ 8,482,279
Net average number of common shares outstanding.............   25,499,999     25,499,999
Net average number of common shares outstanding including
  shares issuable from exercise of options and warrants.....   27,443,307     27,181,315
Earnings per share..........................................  $      0.31    $      0.33
Earnings per share assuming dilution........................  $      0.28    $      0.31
</TABLE>

                                        1
No. 67778.

#### S. Hata Co., Ltd., and American Customs Brokerage Co. *v.*United States,

protest 61/24764, etc. (Honolulu).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel, the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: The items referred to in the invoices as S-l, S-2, S-3, S-4, and S-5, cups, at 10 cents per dozen pieces and 20 percent ad valorem; the items referred to as S-10, teapots; S-ll, sugar bowls; S-12, creamers; S-14, wine cups; S-29, mugs; and S-37, kettles for teapots, at 10 cents per dozen pieces and 25 percent ad valorem; and the items referred to as S-13, wine bottles, and S-17, ashtrays, at 10 cents per dozen pieces and 30 percent ad valorem, as claimed.
Document

Exhibit 10.26








A G C O   C O R P O R A T I O N


DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
for
NON -  EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS
(as of January 1, 2021)
			
	






						
	Retainers  (1)	USD
		
	Annual Lead Director Retainer (paid only to Lead Director):	30,000
		
	Annual Director Base Retainer (applies to all Directors):	120,000
		
	Annual Committee Chairperson Retainer:  
(except Audit Committee and Compensation Committee Chair)
	15,000
		
	Annual Audit Committee Chairperson Retainer:   	25,000
		
	Annual Compensation Committee Chairperson Retainer:	20,000
		
	Additional Annual Retainer for Board Members serving on three committees:	6,000
		
	Additional Compensation	
		
	Annual AGCO Stock Grant Award (2)
	150,000


    


In addition, the Company will reimburse directors for the reasonable out-of-pocket expense incurred in the attendance of the meeting.


























Page 1 of 2










A G C O   C O R P O R A T I O N


DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
for
NON - EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS
(as of January 1, 2021)
			
	










Notes:


1)Payments of annual retainers are made in accordance with the following provisions:




I)Annual Retainers are paid quarterly in four installments (for ease of calculation purposes quarters are divided into 90 days with a 360 day year).
II)Annual Retainers accrue as of the first day of each calendar quarter based on the Board and Committee Membership Roster in effect on that date.
III)Annual Retainers are paid in advance during the first month of the given calendar quarter (e.g., January for the first quarter).
IV)Changes to Board and Committee Memberships (including Chairpersons) will be reviewed and adjustments made to current quarter’s retainer amounts (up or down).
V)Any changes in the Retainer amounts due for the current quarter will be reflected in the ensuing quarter’s retainer payment.




2) Terms applicable to the Stock Grant Award are defined in the Plan Document. The stock grant equivalent to USD 150,000 is based on closing price on the day of the Annual Shareholders’ meeting.




























Page 2 of 2
Payment Collection RIA SIA Zero Dollar Total

May 2017 33,017 82,593 2,711 130 - 118,451

June 2017 31,355 85,615 2,543 128 - 119,641

July 2017 28,831 82,979 2,112 81 - 114,003

Totals 93,203 251,187 7,366 339 - 352,095

 -

 50,000

 100,000

 150,000

 200,000

 250,000

 300,000

 350,000

 400,000

# of transactions

Transaction Type

IPAC Transaction Count

May 2017

June 2017

July 2017

Totals
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**Certification Pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AXT, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, Philip C. S. Yin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), that, to the best of myknowledge:

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: May 12, 2008 | By:    | /s/ Philip C. S. Yin    |
|--------------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                     |   | Philip C. S. Yin        |
|                     |   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Order entered April 25, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-12-01406-CR

JULIA BREAD CORNELIUS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 401st Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 401-82257-2011

ORDER

The Court ORDERS the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine why appellant’s 

brief has not been filed. In this regard, the trial court shall make appropriate findings and 

recommendations and determine whether appellant desires to prosecute the appeal, whether 

appellant is indigent, or if not indigent, whether retained counsel has abandoned the appeal. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). If the trial court cannot obtain appellant’s presence at the hearing, the 

trial court shall conduct the hearing in appellant’s absence. See Meza v. State, 742 S.W.2d 708 

(Tex. App.–Corpus Christi 1987, no pet.) (per curiam). If appellant is indigent, the trial court is 

ORDERED to take such measures as may be necessary to assure effective representation, which 

may include appointment of new counsel.
We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include 

written findings and recommendations, to this Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this 

order.

This appeal is ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The 

appeal shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are 

received, whichever is earlier.

/s/ DAVID EVANS 

JUSTICE
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 192 Filed 01/21/2004 Page 1 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 192 Filed 01/21/2004 Page 2 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 192 Filed 01/21/2004 Page 3 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 192 Filed 01/21/2004 Page 4 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 192 Filed 01/21/2004 Page 5 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 192 Filed 01/21/2004 Page 6 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 192 Filed 01/21/2004 Page 7 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 192 Filed 01/21/2004 Page 8 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 192 Filed 01/21/2004 Page 9 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 192 Filed 01/21/2004 Page 10 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 192 Filed 01/21/2004 Page 11 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 192 Filed 01/21/2004 Page 12 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 192 Filed 01/21/2004 Page 13 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 192 Filed 01/21/2004 Page 14 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 192 Filed 01/21/2004 Page 15 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 192 Filed 01/21/2004 Page 16 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 192 Filed 01/21/2004 Page 17 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 192 Filed 01/21/2004 Page 18 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 192 Filed 01/21/2004 Page 19 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 192 Filed 01/21/2004 Page 20 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 192 Filed 01/21/2004 Page 21 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 192 Filed 01/21/2004 Page 22 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 192 Filed 01/21/2004 Page 23 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 192 Filed 01/21/2004 Page 24 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 192 Filed 01/21/2004 Page 25 of 26
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 192 Filed 01/21/2004 Page 26 of 26
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998             MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           3,891                     151
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 6,072                     189
<PP&E>                                         228,169                 178,748
<DEPRECIATION>                                  16,049                   9,055
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 222,083                 170,033
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,167                   2,087
<BONDS>                                        142,000                  16,394
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             0                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                      74,916                 151,552
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   222,083                 170,033
<SALES>                                          9,601                   7,060
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,706                   7,121
<CGS>                                            3,429                   2,446
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,429                   2,446
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 2,064                   1,469
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,630                     380
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,213                   2,541
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,213                   2,541
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   (86)                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,127                   2,541
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.00                    0.00
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00                    0.00
        

</TABLE>
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 7, 2006

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 04-41390

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 PlaintiffAppellee,

versus

MARCO ANTONIO MARTIN-PARADA,

 DefendantAppellant.

-------------------------------------------------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. 5:04-CR-659-ALL

-------------------------------------------------------------

Before BARKSDALE, STEWART and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Marco Antonio Martin-Parada (Martin) appeals his sentence following his guilty plea

conviction for illegal reentry. He argues that the “felony” and “aggravated felony” provisions of

8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(1) and (b)(2) are unconstitutional in light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S.

466 (2000). Martin’s constitutional challenge is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States,
 

523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998). Although Martin contends that Almendarez-Torres was incorrectly

decided and that a majority of the Supreme Court would overrule Almendarez-Torres in light of

Apprendi, we have repeatedly rejected such arguments on the basisthat Almendarez-Torresremains

binding. See United States v. Garza-Lopez, 410 F.3d 268, 276 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 126 S. Ct.

298 (2005). Martin properly concedes that his argument is foreclosed in light of Almendarez-Torres

and circuit precedent, but he raises it here to preserve it for further review.

Martin also argues that the district court reversibly erred under United States v. Booker, 543

U.S. 220 (2005), by sentencing him pursuant to a mandatory application of the Sentencing

Guidelines. The Government concedes that Martin has preserved this issue for appeal. The

Government, however, has not shown beyond a reasonable doubt that the error was harmless. See

United States v. Walters, 418 F.3d 461, 463-64 (5th Cir. 2005). Accordingly, Martin’s sentence is

VACATED, and this case is REMANDED for resentencing.

CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED FOR

RESENTENCING.
CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER
   PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report of Second Stage Ventures, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended September 30, 2003, as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Blair Mills, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of  2002,  that:

1.  The  Report  fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d)
of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

2.  The  information  contained  in  the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the Company.

Date:  December  24,  2003

                                                      /s/  Blair  Mills
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Blair Mills, Secretary and Treasurer
                                               (Principal  Financial  Officer)


A  signed  original  of  this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  Second  Stage  Ventures  Inc. and will be retained by Second Stage
Ventures  Inc.  and  furnished  to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff  upon  request.


<PAGE>
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1128 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1128

 To expand the Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response grant 
  program to include grants for the support of changing the status of 
 part-time or paid-on-call firefighters to full-time firefighters, and 
                          for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 16, 2017

Mr. Peters (for himself and Ms. Collins) introduced the following bill; 
which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security 
                        and Governmental Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To expand the Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response grant 
  program to include grants for the support of changing the status of 
 part-time or paid-on-call firefighters to full-time firefighters, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Firefighters Retention Act of 
2017''.

SEC. 2. EXPANSION OF STAFFING FOR ADEQUATE FIRE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE 
              GRANT PROGRAM.

    Section 34(a)(1)(B) of the Federal Fire Prevention and Control Act 
of 1974 (15 U.S.C. 2229a(a)(1)(B)) is amended by inserting ``or to 
change the status of part-time or paid-on-call (as defined in section 
33(a)) firefighters to full-time firefighters'' after ``firefighters''.
                                 <all>
```
Case 2:05-cv-00112-PBT Document 17 Filed 02/28/05 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-1311
MARYANN BULLARD, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus PANASONIC CORPORATION OF NORTH AMERICA, Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:05-cv-00269-HCM) Submitted: July 28, 2006 Decided: August 8, 2006 Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. MaryAnn Bullard, Appellant Pro Se. Linda Sue Laibstain, WILLIAMS, MULLEN, HOFHEIMER & NUSBAUM, P.C., Norfolk, Virginia; David Richard Kresser, Atlanta, Georgia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: MaryAnn Bullard appeals the district court’s dismissal of her complaint alleging employment discrimination, retaliatory discharge, sexual harassment and disparate treatment under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. SeeBullard v. Panasonic Corp. of North Am. , No. 2:05-cv-00269-HCM (E.D. Va. Feb. 3, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

**Certification Pursuant to**

**18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

**As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

Inconnection with the Quarterly Report of AXT, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010, as filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,Raymond A. Low, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), that, to the best of myknowledge:

 

(1) The Report fully complies with therequirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Actof 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

 

(2) The information contained in the Reportfairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

 
| Dated:  November 9, 2010 | By:      | /s/ RAYMOND A. LOW                                                |
|-------------------------------|----------|-------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                          |     | Raymond A. Low                                                    |
| * *                      | * * | *Chief Financial Officer*                                         |
| * *                      | * * | *(Principal Financial Officer and**Principal Accounting Officer)* |

 

----
EXHIBIT
32.1



CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO

18
U. S. C. SECTION 1350,

AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the amended Quarterly Report of SIPP International Industries Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for
the period ended December 31, 2006 (the “Report”), I, David Lazar, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
of the Company, hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:



|1. | The
    Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
    and               
|-- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |                                                                                                                                                             
|2. | The
    information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
    of the Company.



|Dated:
    August 24, 2020 | By: | /s/
    David Lazar                                                                                                                                    
|-------------------------- | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                           |     | David
    Lazar                                                                                                                                        
|                           |     | Chief
    Executive Officer                                                                                                                            
|                           |     | Chief
                                         Financial Officer
        (Principal
        Executive Officer and
        Principal Accounting Officer)
Before the First Division,

April 28, 1959

No. 62990.

#### Manca Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 58/6382 (New York).

*360Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of special combination tubes for photomicrography and are necessary for the operation of the photomicrographic camera, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.