alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

Publication of decisions by Member States to grant or revoke operating licenses pursuant to Article 13(4) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2407/92 on licensing of air carriers (1) (2)

(2006/C 160/04)

(Text with EEA relevance)

DENMARK

Operating licences granted

Category B:   Operating licences including the restriction of Article 5(7)(a) of Regulation (EEC) No 2407/92

----

(1)OJ L 240, 24.8.1992, p. 1.

(2)  Communicated to the European Commission before 31.8.2005.

----
* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, e xcept under the

doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, and col lateral estoppel. The court generally disfavors the citation of orders and judgments; nevertheless, an order and judgment may be cited under the terms and condi tions of (10th Cir. Cir. R. 36.3. 

## F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### OCT 11 2001 

### PATRICK FISHER Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

JAMES MARION GUSTIN, SR.,

Petitioner-Appellant,

v. RON WARD,

Respondent-Appellee. Nos. 00-6291 & 00-6356 (D.C. No. CIV-97-668-C) (W.D. Okla.)

ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

Before HENRY , PORFILIO , and MURPHY , Circuit Judges.

After examining the briefs and appellate record, th is panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materiallyassist the determination of these appeals. **See** Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2); 10th Cir. Cir. R. 34.1(G ). The cases are therefore ordered submitted without oral argume nt.1 Gustin separately appealed the district court’s dis missal of his habeas

petition as well as the later denial of his COA request. This court consolidated the appeals. -2- James Gustin, a state prisoner convicted of first-d egree murder, seeks a certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal the district court’s denial of his § 2254 habeas corpus petition. **See** 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (providing that no appeal may be taken from an order denying relief in a § 22 54 petition unless the petitioner-appellant first obtains a COA by making “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right”). 1 Gustin alleges various constitutional violations ar ising from the determination that he was competent at the time he stood trial. This court has reviewed the request for a COA, Gustin’s appellate brief, the magistrate judge’s recommendation, the district court’s order, and theentire record before us. Our review demonstrates that Gustin’s § 2254 petiti on is not deserving of further proceedings, debatable among jurists of reason, or subject to different resolution on appeal. Gustin’s request for a COA is denied. This consolidated appeal is accordingly DISMISSED. Entered for the Court

John C. Porfilio Circuit Judge
Case 2:02-cv-04347-BWK Document 19 Filed 09/09/2003 Page 1 of 8
Case 2:02-cv-04347-BWK Document 19 Filed 09/09/2003 Page 2 of 8
Case 2:02-cv-04347-BWK Document 19 Filed 09/09/2003 Page 3 of 8
Case 2:02-cv-04347-BWK Document 19 Filed 09/09/2003 Page 4 of 8
Case 2:02-cv-04347-BWK Document 19 Filed 09/09/2003 Page 5 of 8
Case 2:02-cv-04347-BWK Document 19 Filed 09/09/2003 Page 6 of 8
Case 2:02-cv-04347-BWK Document 19 Filed 09/09/2003 Page 7 of 8
Case 2:02-cv-04347-BWK Document 19 Filed 09/09/2003 Page 8 of 8
No. 56307.

protests 176928-K (B), etc. (New York).

#### Dale Products Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
929005.1.PHI_LIT_50 3/25/05 9:39 AM 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

Crown Cork & Seal USA, Inc., 

 Plaintiff, 

 v. 

Anheuser-Busch, Inc. and 

Metal Container Corporation, 

 Defendants. 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

No. 05-CV-0438 

NOTICE OF DISMISSAL

 Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Plaintiff, by and 

through counsel, hereby dismiss the above captioned action without prejudice. 

Dated: March 25, 2005 

Respectfully submitted, 

 MS1367 

Dale M. Heist 

Lynn A. Malinoski 

Chad E. Zeigler 

Woodcock Washburn LLP 

One Liberty Place, 46th Floor 

Philadelphia, PA 19103 

(215) 568-3100 telephone 

(215) 568-3439 facsimile 

Robert C. Heim 

Diane Siegel Danoff 

Marc S. Segal 

Dechert LLP 

4000 Bell Atlantic Tower 

1717 Arch Street 

Philadelphia, PA 19086 

(215) 994-4000 telephone 

(215) 994-2222 facsimile 

Attorneys for Plaintiff 

Crown Cork & Seal USA Inc. 

Case 2:05-cv-00438-WY Document 18 Filed 03/25/05 Page 1 of 1
No. 51610.

#### Protest 125115-K of M. Pressner & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The uncontradicted testimony disclosed that the pencil sharpeners in question are composed in chief value of lead, are not plated with platinum, gold, or silver, or colored with gold lacquer, and are similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 48152. On the established facts and following the cited decision the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.2


                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, Salvatore A. Ranieri of Bank United Corp. Litigation Contingent Payment
Rights Trust (the "CPR Trust"), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that: (1) the Annual Report
on Form 10-K of the CPR Trust for the year ended December 31, 2002 (the
"Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and (2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the CPR Trust.


Dated: March 7, 2003


/s/ Salvatore A. Ranieri
---------------------------
Salvatore A. Ranieri
Litigation Trustee
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32 (a)

    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northland Cable Television, Inc. and
Subsidiary (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Form
10-Q"), I, John Whetzell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;

         (1)      The Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Section
         13 (a) or (15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m
         or 78(d)); and

         (2)      The information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents in
         all material respects, the financial condition and results of
         operations of the Company.

DATE: 5-17-04



/s/ JOHN S. WHETZELL
------------------------------------
John S. Whetzell
Chief Executive Officer

A signed original of this written statement will be retained by Northland Cable
Television, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                          32,273
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           1,923
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 5,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                    482,280
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                         511,682
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                           511,117
<LOANS>                                        617,235
<ALLOWANCE>                                    (7,165)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,202,214
<DEPOSITS>                                     946,530
<SHORT-TERM>                                    13,819
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                              7,101
<LONG-TERM>                                    164,725
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           114
<OTHER-SE>                                      69,925
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>               1,202,214
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 37,617
<INTEREST-INVEST>                               22,845
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   259
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                26,954
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                              31,967
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              28,754
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            1,518
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                    4,793
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                 354
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                 19,110
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,273
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                      13,273
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     8,537
<EPS-BASIC>                                      $0.77
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $0.77
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.67
<LOANS-NON>                                      2,343
<LOANS-PAST>                                     2,497
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                 6,576
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                    1,095
<RECOVERIES>                                       168
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                7,165
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                             7,165
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AXT, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004, as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Donald L. Tatzin,Interim Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 (“Section 906”), that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1)   The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the Securities and ExchangeAct of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

 

(2)   The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: August 5, 2004 | By:    | /s/ Donald L. Tatzin            |
|-----------------------|--------|---------------------------------|
|                  |   | Donald L. Tatzin                |
|                  |   | Interim Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
pre epeanarn
Eni

Yi

IPAC Operational Metrics for April 2016

Volume by Transaction Type

Dollar Amount] ‘% of Total Dollar Amount| Number of Transactions| _% of Total Number of Transactions|
Fiduciary (investment & Borrowing) 16,083,861,293,421 93.58% 9,215, 8.37%
Buy/Sell 62,100,235,287 0.38%! 99,352 90.27%
Benefits (RITS) 5,331,240,272 0.03% 374] 0.34%
Check Aftermath (TRACS) 116,029,794! 0.00% | 1116 1.01%
Zero Dollar 0 0.00% 0 0.00%
(Grand Total - April 2016 16,151,408,798,774 10.00% 110,057| 10.00%
(Grand Total - March 2016 17,644,636,416,606 10.00% 113,385] 100.00%|
[March to April Change =1,493,227,617,832
Percentage Change 8.556 po -2.956]
Grand Total - April 2015 9,548,351,454,509 | | si, 604
[Apr 2015 to Apr 2016 Change 6,603,057,344,265| j C8547
Percentage Change 9.2% [20s
**Exhibit 13.2**

 

 

**Certification**

 

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)**

 

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officer of Allianz SE, a European Company (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that: 

 

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the“Report”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition andresults of operations of the Company. 

 

Date:June 14, 2007
No. 50372.

#### Protests 25609-K (S-1), etc., of Ti Hang Lung & Co. et al. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

It was stipulated and agreed that the merchandise in question consists of medicinal preparations the same in all material respects as the merchandise passed upon in *Wing Duck Co.*v. *United States*(6 Cust. Ct. 133, C. D. 446), and *Shun Yuen King & Co.*v. *United States*(11 Ct. Cust. Appls. 331, T. D. 39143), which records were incorporated herein. In accordance therewith it was held that the revenue tax imposed by the collector does not apply to the merchandise. The protests were sustained to this extent.
DISMISS; and Opinion Filed July 3 , 2019 .

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 18
- 01009
- CV AJANI REESE , Appellant

V. HIGHLAND PARK APARTM ENTS , Appellee
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC
- 18
- 03315
- E 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Brown, and Nowell Opinion by Justice Brown On March 8, 2019, appellant filed his brief on the merits. Deeming the brief deficient, we directed appellant to file an amended brief no later than April 8, 2019 and subsequently extended that deadline to May 28, 2019. To date, however, the amended brief has not been filed. Our letter directing appellant to file the amended brief by April 8, 2019 cautioned appellant
that failure to file the brief could result in the appeal being dismissed without further notice

. See
T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 38.8(a)(1), 42.3(b),(c). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal. See id. 38.8(a)(1), 43.3(b),(c).

181009F.P05 /Ada Brown/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE– 2

– 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT
AJANI REESE, Appellant
No. 05

- 18

- 01009

- CV V. HIGHLAND PARK APARTMENTS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC

- 18

- 03315

- E. Opinion delivered by Justice Brown, Justices Bridges and Nowell participating.
In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, we DI SMISS the appeal.
Judgment entered this 3 rd day of July, 2019.
Document

Exhibit 10.40




ASSURED GUARANTY LTD.


DESCRIPTION OF 2021 EXECUTIVE OFFICER CASH COMPENSATION


Set forth below are the 2021 annual salaries of the Executive Officers to be named in the compensation tables in Assured Guaranty’s 2021 proxy statement, which will be filed with the SEC not later than 120 days after the close of the fiscal year pursuant to regulation 14A, and who serve as Executive Officers as of the date of this filing. 




 
						
	Executive Officer	Salary
	

Dominic J. Frederico
President and Chief Executive Officer
	$1,250,000
	

Robert A. Bailenson
Chief Financial Officer
	$800,000
	

Ling Chow
General Counsel and Secretary
	$600,000
	Russell B. Brewer II
Chief Surveillance Officer
	$550,000
	

David Buzen*
Chief Investment Officer and Head of Asset Management
	$800,000




The named executive officers will also be eligible for the following:


						
		
	•	To be considered to receive equity and non-equity incentive compensation for 2020 performance.



						
		
	•	To receive other annual compensation and benefits, including employer contributions to retirement plans.










			
	* Mr. Buzen's salary was raised from $500,000 to $800,000 per annum in August 2020 when he became Chief Investment Officer and Head of Asset Management.
Exhibit
      32.2


CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual report of Pacificap Entertainment Holdings, Inc.
      (the
“Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
      Mark Schaftlein, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
                Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
                of
                the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934;
                and





(2)
            The
                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
                respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
                Company.





A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided
      to
      Pacificap Entertainment Holdings, Inc. and will be retained by Pacificap
      Entertainment Holdings, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
      Commission or its staff upon request.





Date:
                April 18, 2007
            
            By:
            */s/
                MARK SCHAFTLEIN*Mark
                SchaftleinPrincipal
                Financial Officer
# C_2023035EN.01004301.xml

| 30.1.2023 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 35/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.1.2023

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 35/43

---

Judgment of the General Court of 30 November 2022 — Trasta Komercbanka and Others v ECB

(Case T-698/16) (1)

(Economic and monetary policy - Prudential supervision of credit institutions - Specific supervisory tasks assigned to the ECB - Decision to withdraw a credit institution’s authorisation - Death of an applicant - No need to adjudicate in part - Powers of the national authorities of participating Member States and of the ECB under the Single Supervisory Mechanism - Equal treatment - Proportionality - Legitimate expectations - Legal certainty - Misuse of powers - Rights of the defence - Obligation to state reasons)

(2023/C 35/49)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: Trasta Komercbanka AS (Riga, Latvia), and six other applicants whose names are set out in the annex to the judgment (represented by: O. Behrends, lawyer)

Defendant: European Central Bank (represented by: E. Koupepidou, C. Hernández Saseta and A. Witte, acting as Agents, and by B. Schneider, lawyer)

Interveners in support of the defendant: Republic of Latvia (represented by: K. Pommere and J. Davidoviča, acting as Agents), European Commission (represented by: V. Di Bucci and A. Steiblytė, acting as Agents)

Re:

By their action based on Article 263 TFEU, the applicants seek annulment of Decision ECB/SSM/2016-529900WIP0INFDAWTJ81/2 WOANCA-2016-0005 of the ECB of 11 July 2016 withdrawing the authorisation of Trasta Komercbanka for access to the activities of a credit institution.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that there is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action in so far as it was brought by Mr Igors Buimisters; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that there is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action in so far as it was brought by Mr Igors Buimisters;

| 2. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action;

| 3. | Orders Trasta Komercbanka AS and the other applicants whose names are included in the annex, with the exception of Mr Buimisters, to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Trasta Komercbanka AS and the other applicants whose names are included in the annex, with the exception of Mr Buimisters, to pay the costs;

| 4. | Orders Mr Buimisters to bear his own costs; |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders Mr Buimisters to bear his own costs;

| 5. | Orders the European Commission and the Republic of Latvia to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

5.

Orders the European Commission and the Republic of Latvia to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 441, 28.11.2016.

---
##### 



Exhibit 32
 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT, FINANCE PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
    /s/ Kleanthis G. Xanthopoulos
    
    
    
    /s/ Jennifer K. CrittendenKleanthis G. Xanthopoulos, Ph.D.
    
    
    
    Jennifer K. CrittendenChief Executive Officer and President
    
    
    
    Vice President, FinanceDate: March 15, 2006
    
    
    
    Date: March 15, 2006
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

I,Philip C. S. Yin, certify that:

1. I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q of AXT, Inc.;

2. Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors:

(a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b) Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
| Dated: November 9, 2006 |   | By:    |   | /s/ Philip C. S. Yin    |
|------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|                         |   |   |   | Philip C. S. Yin        |
|                         |   |   |   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----