alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-6912

ROY ALLEN THOMAS, JR.,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; T. RAY, Warden; T.

ADAMS, Sgt.; G. CHILDRESS, Sgt.; SERGEANT DAY;

SERGEANT FLEMING; MCMULLINS, Sergeant; OFFICER

LAMBERT; OFFICER SMITH; GREERE, Officer; D.

MCNIGHT, Food Services; HEALTH SERVICES

DIRECTOR; WEBB, Officer; DIRECTOR OF

DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; R. FLEMING, Major;

NURSE ADAMS; NURSE MULLINS; SAM BOYD, Officer;

FOOD SERVICES DIRECTOR; DR. WILLIAMS;

GRIEVANCE DEPARTMENT; L. HALL, Officer;

ASSISTANT UNIT MANAGER HORN, Officer; WARDEN

ARMENTROUT, Assistant; MAILROOM STAFF,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western

District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District

Judge. (CA-05-232-7)

Submitted: October 26, 2005 Decided: November 21, 2005

Before LUTTIG, KING, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roy Allen Thomas, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
- 2 -

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 3 -

PER CURIAM:

Roy Allen Thomas, Jr. appeals the district court’s order

dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) action, alleging deliberate

indifference to medical needs, for failure to state a claim

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1) (2000). We have reviewed the

record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. See Thomas v. Virginia, No. CA-05-232-7 (W.D. Va. Apr. 22,

2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF CHASTAIN CAPITAL CORPORATION FOR THE PERIOD ENDED MARCH
31, 1999 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                       8,875,695
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               717,459
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                 135,926
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              78,178,508
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       19,934,605
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           73,468
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                  58,170,435
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                78,178,508
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,450,342
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               625,635
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               519,528
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,236,354
<INCOME-PRETAX>                             (1,594,800)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                         (1,594,800)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                (1,594,800)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.22)
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

: CIVIL ACTION NOS.

:

WYLIE : 02-3872

JACOBS, et al. : 02-3931

MORRIS : 02-3968

VARGAS, et al. : 02-4172

WALSH, et al. : 02-4181

WASLH, et al. : 02-4183

BRUNO : 02-4232

BURNETT, et al. : 02-4236

ANCTIL : 02-4285

FISHER, et al. : 02-4293

ASHCRAFT : 02-4297

CHARBONEAU : 02-4308

:

VS. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION, et al. :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of July, 2002, the Court having been previously

advised that the above action cannot proceed to trial and disposition because of the following

reason:

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending disposition of a related

action.

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending determination of

arbitration proceedings.

[ ] - Interlocutory appeal filed.

[ X ] - Other: Case is placed into suspense pending receipt of the Case

Transfer Order from the Judicial Panel on Multi District Litigation

transferring case to District of Minnesota..

It is

ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this action closed for statistical purposes and

place the matter in the Civil Suspense File, and it is

Case 2:02-cv-04183-LDD Document 2 Filed 07/15/2002 Page 1 of 2
FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction; and that the case be

restored to the trial docket when the action is in a status so that it may proceed to final

disposition; this order shall not prejudice the rights of the parties to this litigation.

BY THE COURT:

________________________________________

Legrome D. Davis, Judge

Case 2:02-cv-04183-LDD Document 2 Filed 07/15/2002 Page 2 of 2
# C_2018152EN.01002701.xml

| 30.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 152/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 152/27

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 March 2018 — Naviera Armas v Commission

(Case T-108/16) (1)

1

((State aid - Conditions of use of the Puerto Las Nieves port infrastructure by a shipping company - Exclusive use of infrastructures financed by public funds, without a concession contract - Partial exoneration of payment of port dues - Complaint lodged by a competitor - Decision finding no State aid at the end of the preliminary investigation procedure - Serious difficulties in the examination of the measures concerned - Developments in the situation during the administrative procedure - Concept of advantage granted by means of State resources - Errors of assessment of the facts and errors of law - Decision of a national court suspending the effects of a tendering procedure - Requirement of diligent and impartial examination of the complaint))

(2018/C 152/32)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Naviera Armas, SA (Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain) (represented by: J. L. Buendía Sierra and Á. Givaja Sanz, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: A. Bouchagiar, G. Luengo and S. Noë, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Intervener in support of the defendant: Fred Olsen, SA (Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain) (represented by: F. Marín Riaño, lawyer)

Intervener in support of the defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Commission Decision C(2015) 8655 final of 8 December 2015 concerning State aid SA.36628 (2015/NN) (ex 2013/CP) — Spain — Fred Olsen.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Commission Decision C(2015) 8655 final of 8 December 2015 concerning State aid SA.36628 (2015/NN) (ex 2013/CP) — Spain — Fred Olsen in so far as it is found therein that, at the end of the preliminary investigation procedure, the exclusive use of the Puerto de Las Nieves port infrastructure by Fred Olsen, SA had not entailed any State aid to that company; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Commission Decision C(2015) 8655 final of 8 December 2015 concerning State aid SA.36628 (2015/NN) (ex 2013/CP) — Spain — Fred Olsen in so far as it is found therein that, at the end of the preliminary investigation procedure, the exclusive use of the Puerto de Las Nieves port infrastructure by Fred Olsen, SA had not entailed any State aid to that company;

| 2. | Dismisses the action as to the remainder; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action as to the remainder;

| 3. | Orders Naviera Armas, SA to bear 25 % of its own costs, with the remainder to be paid by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Naviera Armas, SA to bear 25 % of its own costs, with the remainder to be paid by the European Commission;

| 4. | Orders the Commission and Fred Olsen to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the Commission and Fred Olsen to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 175, 17.5.2016.

1

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

GENERAL REFRACTORIES COMPANY : CIVIL ACTION 

:

v. :

:

FIRST STATE INSURANCE CO., et al. : No. 04-3509 

ORDER 

AND NOW, this 13th day of April, 2012, the following is ordered: 

C “Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company and First State Insurance

Company’s Motion for Leave to File a Reply” (doc. no. 431) is granted; and

C “Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company and First State Insurance

Company’s Motion for Reconsideration of the Court’s Memorandum

Entered on February 21, 2012" (doc. no. 423) is denied. 

BY THE COURT: 

/s/ Edmund V. Ludwig 

Edmund V. Ludwig, J. 

Case 2:04-cv-03509-LFR Document 440 Filed 04/13/12 Page 1 of 1
Census

TAS

Reference

Information

Data 

CARS GTAS

Sources

Public Website and Database

MTS

Outlays by

Function

Data

GTAS 

SF 133

Data

Diagram of External Data Sets

As defined in the Consumption-Focused Metadata (CFM)

Submission

Metadata

Broker

Legend

CARS Central Accounting Reporting System

GTAS Governmentwide Treasury Account Symbol Adjusted Trial Balance System

TAS Treasury Account Symbol

MTS Monthly Treasury Statement

NAICS North American Industry Classification System 

PSC Product Service Codes

OMB Office of Management and Budget Meta Data Defined in CFM

GSDM Version 1.0

External 

Sources

NAICS 

and PSC

OMB 

Master 

Account 

Title

OMB 

MAT File
Case 2:04-cr-00774-BMS Document 27 Filed 10/27/09 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:04-cr-00774-BMS Document 27 Filed 10/27/09 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:04-cr-00774-BMS Document 27 Filed 10/27/09 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:04-cr-00774-BMS Document 27 Filed 10/27/09 Page 4 of 4
No. 51300.

#### Protests 58082-K, etc., of Alberico *&*Funicello et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
The Rural Information Center (RIC), located at the National Agricultural Library, provides

information and referral services to local government officials, community organizations,

cooperatives, libraries, businesses, and rural citizens working to maintain the vitality of

America's rural areas.

SERVICES:

Provide customized information products to specific inquiries including assistance in

economic revitalization issues; local government planning projects; funding sources; and

other related issues for the purpose of monitoring the quality of rural life.

Process a broad array of general and funding information requests on such topics as:

! Successful strategies, models, and case studies of community development projects

! Small business attraction, retention, and expansion

! Tourism promotion and development

! Recycling programs

! Community water quality

! Technology transfer to rural areas

Refer users to organizations and experts for additional information.

Perform brief database searches of requested topics.

Furnish bibliographies and resource materials

1-800-633-7701

USDA Rural Information Center, National Agriculture Library

10301 Baltimore Avenue, Room 304

Beltsville, MD 20705-2351

http://www.nal.usda.gov/ric

ric@nal.usda.gov
Bibliographies in the Quick Bibliography Series of the National Agricultural Library, are

intended primarily for current awareness, and as the title of the series implies, are not

indepth exhaustive bibliographies on any given subject. However, the citations are a

substantial resource for recent investigations on a given topic. They also serve the

purpose of bringing the literature of agriculture to the interested user who, in many

cases, could not access it by any other means. The bibliographies are derived from

computerized online searches of the AGRICOLA data base. Timeliness of topic and

evidence of extensive interest are the selection criteria. 

The author/searcher determines the purpose, length, and search strategy of the Quick

Bibliography. Information regarding these is available upon request from the

author/searcher.

Copies of this bibliography may be made or used for distribution without prior

approval. The inclusion or omission of a particular publication or citation may not be

construed as endorsement or disapproval. 

To request a copy of a bibliography in this series, send the series title, series number

and self-addressed gummed label to: 

U.S. Department of Agriculture

National Agricultural Library

Public Services Division, Room 111

Beltsville, Maryland 20705
Case No. 9,709.

#### The MONITOR.

[10 Ben. 188.] 1

District Court, S. D. New York.

Dec. Term. 1878.

Maritime Lien — Supplies—Vessel Leaving Port.

The departure of a steamboat, running between New York and Stuyvesant-on-the-Hudson, from New York on her daily trip is a “leaving of the port,” within the language of the statute of New York of 1862, c. 482, in relation to liens on domestic vessels; and specifications of lien must be filed within twelve days from such departure, to make the lien valid.

In admiralty.

Henry Tompkins, for libellant

Ten Broeck & Van Orden, for claimant

1

 [Reported by Robert D. Benedict Esq., and Benj. Lincoln Benedict, Esq., and here reprinted by permission.]

CHOATE. District Judge.

This is a libel for supplies furnished to the Monitor, in July and August, 1876. She made daily trips between New York and Stuyvesant, on the Hudson river, during the summer and until the 15th of November. Specifications of the claim were, filed November 17th, 1876, in the office of the county clerk of the county of New York. The supplies were charged the *602vessel and owners, and in fact the libellant relied on the credit of the vessel. A lien is claimed, first, by the general maritime law, and secondly, by the New York statute of [April 24] 1862, c. 482, § 2 [Laws 1862, p. 956]. The case of The Lottawanna, 21 Wall. [88 U. S.] 558, is conclusive against the general maritime lien. The state statute provides that the lien shall cease “whenever such ship or vessel shall leave the port at which such debt was contracted, unless the person having such lien shall, within twelve days after such departure, cause to be drawn up and filed specifications, etc.” It is argued that the proper construction of the statute as applied to a steamboat running between one place and another within the district, is that the “departure” intended is the final departure from the port, and not her departure on her daily trip. I think the language will not admit of this construction. The words “shall leave the port” are unambiguous. They do not mean “shall leave the jurisdiction” or “the district.” The vessel undoubtedly left the port of New York every day after these supplies were furnished. The specifications were not filed within twelve days thereafter. Therefore, the lien ceased. This construction was put upon the similar provision of the Revised Statutes of New York in Veltman v. Thompson, 3 N. Y. 438. Libel dismissed with costs.
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 191 Filed 03/16/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:02-cv-04373-RB Document 191 Filed 03/16/2007 Page 2 of 2
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**Certification
      Pursuant To**


**Section
      906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**





The
      undersigned, in the capacities and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies
      that:




1.  This
      annual report of FirstFlight, Inc. fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2.  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operation of FirstFlight,
      Inc.


Date: April
                17, 2007
            By:
            /s/
                John H. DowJohn
                H. DowPrincipal
                Executive Officer




A
      signed
      original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document
      authentications, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears
      in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required
      by Section 906, has been provided to FirstFlight, Inc. and will be retained
      by
      FirstFlight, Inc., and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
      or
      its staff upon request.
- 389 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 310 Nebraska Reports IN RE ESTATE OF LAKIN Cite as 310 Neb. 389

In re Estate of Charles E. Lakin, deceased. Charles E. Lakin Foundation, Inc., appellant, v. Thomas Pribil and William Kilzer, Copersonal Representatives of the Estate of Charles E. Lakin, appellees. In re Trust of Charles E. Lakin, deceased. Charles E. Lakin Foundation, Inc., appellant, v. Thomas Pribil and William Kilzer, Cotrustees of the Charles E. Lakin Revocable Trust, et al., appellees. ___ N.W.2d ___ Filed November 19, 2021. Nos. S-20-093, S-20-094.

supplemental opinion Appeals from the County Court for Douglas County: Stephanie S. Shearer , Judge. Former opinion modified. Motions for rehearing overruled. Zachary W. Lutz-Priefert, Frederick D. Stehlik, William J. Lindsay, Jr., and John A. Svoboda, of Gross & Welch, P.C., L.L.O., for appellant. Edward D. Hotz, Amanda M. Forker, and Benjamin C. Deaver, of Pansing, Hogan, Ernst & Bachman, L.L.P., for defendants-appellees Thomas L. Pribil and William A. Kilzer. Trenten P. Bausch and Megan S. Wright, of Cline, Williams, Wright, Johnson & Oldfather, L.L.P., for appellee Thomas L. Pribil in his individual capacity. Nebraska Supreme Court Online Library www.nebraska.gov/apps-courts-epub/ 01/21/2022 12:08 AM CST- 390 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 310 Nebraska Reports IN RE ESTATE OF LAKIN Cite as 310 Neb. 389 Cathy S. Trent-Vilim and Brian J. Brislen, of Lamson, Dugan & Murray, L.L.P., for appellee William A. Kilzer, an individual.
Heavican , C.J., Cassel , Stacy , Funke , and Freudenberg , JJ.
Per Curiam

. This case is before us on three motions for rehearing filed by the appellees, Thomas Pribil and William Kilzer—in their individual capacities and their capacities as copersonal rep

resentatives and cotrustees—concerning our opinion in In re Estate of Lakin

. 1 While there is no substantive merit to the motions, Pribil and Kilzer point out that this court incorrectly found that the check used to pay Pribil was not in our record. The check appears in exhibit 59. We overrule the motions, but modify the original opinion to substitute language as follows. In the paragraph under the subheading “7. § 6-1437,” we withdraw the third and fourth sentences and substitute: “Our record is not clear on the source of the payment and the capacity of the person making the payment.” The remainder of the opinion shall remain unmodified. Former opinion modified. Motions for rehearing overruled. Miller

- Lerman and Papik , JJ., not participating.

1 In re Estate of Lakin , 310 Neb. 271, 965 N.W.2d 365 (2021).
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1285 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1285

  To allow the Confederated Tribes of Coos, Lower Umpqua, and Siuslaw 
   Indians, the Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Community of 
   Oregon, the Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians of Oregon, the 
 Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs, and the Cow Creek Band of Umpqua 
          Tribe of Indians to lease or transfer certain lands.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 25, 2017

  Mr. Merkley introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
              referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To allow the Confederated Tribes of Coos, Lower Umpqua, and Siuslaw 
   Indians, the Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Community of 
   Oregon, the Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians of Oregon, the 
 Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs, and the Cow Creek Band of Umpqua 
          Tribe of Indians to lease or transfer certain lands.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Oregon Tribal Economic Development 
Act''.

SEC. 2. APPROVAL NOT REQUIRED TO VALIDATE LAND TRANSACTIONS.

    (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, 
without further approval, ratification, or authorization by the United 
States, the Confederated Tribes of Coos, Lower Umpqua, and Siuslaw 
Indians, the Confederated Tribes of the Grand Ronde Community of 
Oregon, the Confederated Tribes of Siletz Indians of Oregon, the 
Confederated Tribes of Warm Springs, and the Cow Creek Band of Umpqua 
Tribe of Indians may lease, sell, convey, warrant, or otherwise 
transfer all or any part of its interests in any real property that is 
not held in trust by the United States for the benefit of such tribe.
    (b) Trust Land Not Affected.--Nothing in this section shall--
            (1) authorize the Confederated Tribes of Coos, Lower 
        Umpqua, and Siuslaw Indians, the Confederated Tribes of the 
        Grand Ronde Community of Oregon, the Confederated Tribes of 
        Siletz Indians of Oregon, the Confederated Tribes of Warm 
        Springs, and the Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe of Indians to 
        lease, sell, convey, warrant, or otherwise transfer all or any 
        part of an interest in any real property that is held in trust 
        by the United States for the benefit of such tribe; or
            (2) affect the operation of any law governing leasing, 
        selling, conveying, warranting, or otherwise transferring any 
        interest in such trust land.
                                 <all>
```