alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary  information  extracted from the Balance Sheet at
June 30, 1999 and  Statement  of  operations  for the three and six months ended
June 30, 1999,  and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such  financial
statements.

</LEGEND>


<MULTIPLIER>                     1000

<S>                               <C>                 <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           3-MOS               6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                    DEC-31-1999         DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                         JUN-30-1999         JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                       1,572              1,572
<SECURITIES>                                     0                  0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    0                  0
<ALLOWANCES>                                     0                  0
<INVENTORY>                                      0                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 0                  0
<PP&E>                                     235,780            235,780
<DEPRECIATION>                             (26,687)           (26,687)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             226,316            226,316
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            0                  0
<BONDS>                                    142,000            142,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0                  0
<PREFERRED>                                      0                  0
<COMMON>                                         0                  0
<OTHER-SE>                                  80,518             80,518
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               226,316            226,316
<SALES>                                      9,770             19,337
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             9,874             19,529
<CGS>                                        3,531              7,031
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,531              7,031
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,855              5,654
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                0                  0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,268              4,537
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,220              2,307
<INCOME-TAX>                                     0                  0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,220              2,307
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0                  0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,220              2,307
<EPS-BASIC>                                    0                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    0                  0



</TABLE>
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Leading edge.**
 
SuDoc Number:D 301.125:

Item Number:0307-A-05 (online)
CGP systemNumber:001028179
 
2003: SepOctNovDec
2004: JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSep
 
May 18, 2020
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

STEWART DALZELL 10613 United States 

 Courthouse

 JUDGE Independence Mall West

 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

19106

 

 267-299-7399

 

July 17, 2002 

**AMENDED NOTICE**

Edward R. Kennett, Esq.

8 N. Queen St., P.O. Box 449

Lancaster, PA 17608-0449

Marshall Walthew, Esq.

Milind M. Shah, Esq.

1717 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103

Re: C.A. No. 02-4331, Paradise v. Allstate Ins. Co.

Dear Counsel:

Judge Dalzell has set the referenced case for a Rule 16

conference at 2:00 p.m. on Wednesday, August 14, 2002, in his

chambers.

As you will see from the enclosed Scheduling Policy

Statement, Judge Dalzell allots between ten and twenty minutes

for these conferences. You should review the Scheduling Policy

Statement before completing the "Conference Information Report"

enclosed with this letter. You should bring the Conference

Information Report with you to the Rule 16 conference.

At the close of the conference, you will receive an

Order from Judge Dalzell that will list firm dates for the

completion of discovery, other pretrial submissions and trial

that will be set at the conference.

Very truly yours,

Eileen Adler

Courtroom Deputy

ec

Enc.

Case 2:02-cv-04331-SD Document 4 Filed 07/17/2002 Page 1 of 1
OAR Box 1384 

Prepped by Charmelle Mathews 

p.i 

Document Number: 

145) ll-E-105 

Docket Number: 

A-94-52 

Printed 7/2/2008 8:42:08 AM Sheet 145 of 264 
P.2 

OCT-23-9 7 12:4 0 PM LIVINGSTON.MOLDE.PRODUCT 253852672 9 

ni.ii.-H/ 14157 Bldi»<m0234 PES RTP NC 

Contact Report 

From: Robert Jemison, Pacific Environmental Services, Inc. (PES) 

Date: October 22,1997 

Con I act: Mr. Bob Morganstern 

Company: Livingston, Inc. 

Telephone Number: (253) 288 0502 

Fax Number: (253) 288-0436 

P..01 

21002.-on 2 

•A-9 4 

II 

-S7 

Contact Summary: 

Mr. Bob Morganstern was contacted to update information provided in the 1993 EPA 

screening survey submitted by Livingston, Inc. for their Auburn. Washington facility. Tn response 

to my questions Mr. Morganstern indicated the following: 

The facility still uses the mechanical resin application (open molding) and resin transfer 

molding (closed molding) reinforced plastics fabrication processes. The facility has completely 

switched from atomized mechanical lesiu application to non-atomized mechanical resin application 

by purchasing and installing Venus flow chopper equipment. 

The facility has added the use of a low pressure sheet molding compound (approximately 

5500 lbs/month) which requires a lower temperature and pressure for curing than the typical Sheet 

molding compounds currently used by the reinforced plastics industry. The facility is also currently 

experimenting wilh a proprietary vacuum bagging process. 

The styrene content of die primary resin applied by mechanical resin application is 38.0 

percent by weighr. The styrene content oftlic gel coat used by the facility is 35.9 percent by weight. 

There is no additional stymie added to the resin rir nV. gel coat. 

The resin used in the resin transfer molding (RTM) process contains approximately 50 

percent methyl methacrylate and approximately 40 percent filler is added tn the resin. The RTM 

process used by Livingston, Inc. is 100 percent closed molding. 

INFORMATION TS ACCURATE 

' VfrMfi- ' W
EXHIBIT 32.1
 STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
    A)
    
    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a) or
78o(d)) andB)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company as of the dates and for the periods covered by the Report.
  March 31, 2009
Dated
    
    /s/ Michael W. Mahler

Michael W. Mahler
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          18,747
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    6,699
<ALLOWANCES>                                       195
<INVENTORY>                                     10,897
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                38,115
<PP&E>                                          24,491
<DEPRECIATION>                                     902
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  61,704
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,732
<BONDS>                                          8,410
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        35,229
<OTHER-SE>                                      12,333
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    61,704
<SALES>                                         19,532
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,520
<CGS>                                           11,599
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,082
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,394
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                    95
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 339
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  4,702
<INCOME-TAX>                                     1,797
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              2,905
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     2,905
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .20
        

</TABLE>
Case 2:04-cv-04110-NIQA   Document 129   Filed 03/07/17   Page 1 of 1
# C_2018152EN.01002801.xml

| 30.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 152/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 152/28

---

Judgment of the General Court of 15 March 2018 — Caviro Distillerie and Others v Commission

(Case T-211/16) (1)

1

((Dumping - Imports of tartaric acid originating in China and produced by Hangzhou Bioking Biochemical Engineering Co., Ltd - Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/176 - Non-imposition of a definitive anti-dumping duty - Article 3(2), (3) and (5) and Article 17(1) and (2) of Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 - Sampling - No material injury - Manifest error of assessment - Determination of injury - Profitability of the Union industry))

(2018/C 152/33)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Caviro Distillerie Srl (Faenza, Italy), Distillerie Bonollo SpA (Formigine, Italy), Distillerie Mazzari SpA (Sant’Agata sul Santerno, Italy), Industria Chimica Valenzana (ICV) SpA (Borgoricco, Italy) (represented by: A. Bochon, lawyer, and R. MacLean, Solicitor)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: J.-F. Brakeland and A. Demeneix, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action under Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of Article 1 of Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2016/176 of 9 February 2016 terminating the anti-dumping proceeding concerning imports of tartaric acid originating in the People’s Republic of China and produced by Hangzhou Bioking Biochemical Engineering Co., Ltd (OJ 2016 L 33, p. 14).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Caviro Distillerie Srl, Distillerie Bonollo SpA, Distillerie Mazzari SpA and Industria Chimica Valenzana (ICV) SpA to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Caviro Distillerie Srl, Distillerie Bonollo SpA, Distillerie Mazzari SpA and Industria Chimica Valenzana (ICV) SpA to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 260, 18.7.2016.

1

---
No. 57624.

#### Package Products Co., Inc., and Van Oppen & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 204995-K and 206678-K (A) (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of cellulose sheets the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 56780, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

STATE OF FLORIDA

_____________________________

No. 1D2023-0820

_____________________________

JIMMIE CASEN,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

_____________________________

Petition for Writ of Mandamus—Original Jurisdiction.

December 29, 2023

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED.

ROBERTS, ROWE, and RAY, JJ., concur.

_____________________________

Not final until disposition of any timely and 

authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 

9.331.

_____________________________

Jimmie Casen, pro se, Petitioner.
2

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
# C_2019004EN.01002401.xml

| 7.1.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 4/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.1.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 4/24

---

Judgment of the General Court of 25 October 2018 — PO and Others v EEAS

(Case T-729/16) (1)

(Civil Service - EEAS - Remuneration - Officials posted to the Beijing delegation - Family allowance - Education allowance for the school year 2015/2016 - Second sentence of Article 15 of Annex X to the Staff Regulations - Exceedance of the statutory ceiling for third countries - Decision to cap the reimbursement of education costs in exceptional circumstances - General Implementing Provisions)

(2019/C 4/32)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: PO, PP, PQ and PR (represented initially by: N. de Montigny and J.-N. Louis, and subsequently by: N. de Montigny, lawyers)

Defendant: European External Action Service (represented by: S. Marquardt and R. Spac, acting as Agents, and M. Troncoso Ferrer, F.-M. Hislaire and S. Moya Izquierdo, lawyers).

Re:

Application based on Article 270 TFEU seeking the annulment of the decisions of the EEAS not to reimburse the applicants, in respect of the school year 2015/2016, for the education costs exceeding an amount corresponding to the statutory ceiling for third countries (six times the basic ceiling) increased by EUR 10 000 (EUR 27 788,40 in total).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders PO, PP, PQ and PR to bear their own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European External Action Service (EEAS). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders PO, PP, PQ and PR to bear their own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European External Action Service (EEAS).

---

(1)  OJ C 475, 19.12.2016.

---
Exhibit 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In  connection  with the Quarterly  Report of GSV, Inc. (the  "Company") on Form
10-QSB for the period ending  September 30, 2003 (the  "Report"),  I, Gilad Gat,
Chief  Executive  Officer and Chief Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1)   The Report fully  complies with the  requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2)   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the Company's financial position and results of operations.


By:  /s/ Gilad Gat
     ----------------------------------
     Gilad Gat
     Chief Executive Officer
     Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Quarterly Report of National Equipment Services, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2002 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael D. Milligan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:



/s/MICHAEL D. MILLIGAN

Michael
D. Milligan
Michael D. Milligan
Chief Financial Officer
November 14, 2002

---

QuickLinks
United States Court of Appeals

for the Fifth Circuit ____________

No. 22-10761

Summary Calendar

____________

United States of America, 

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Jose Maria Ibarra-Quintero, 

Defendant—Appellant.

______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:19-CR-15-1

______________________________

Before Higginbotham, Graves, and Ho, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

The attorney appointed to represent Jose Maria Ibarra-Quintero has 

moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders 

v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 

(5th Cir. 2011). Ibarra-Quintero has not filed a response. We have reviewed 

counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We 

concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous 

_____________________

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

May 1, 2023

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

Case: 22-10761 Document: 00516732421 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/01/2023
No. 22-10761

2

issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to 

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities 

herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Case: 22-10761 Document: 00516732421 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/01/2023
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of TenFold
Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert W. Felton, Chairman of the Board, President,
and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                          
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                          
|/s/ Robert W. Felton                                                      
|Robert W. Felton                                                          
|Chairman of the Board of Directors, President, and Chief Executive Officer
|August 1, 2006
From: Reyes Romero
To: Monica Soucier Subject: FW: Questions regarding 400.3

Date: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 11:21:56 AM



### Please add to the list, thanks,

From: Rick Wolery [mailto:rickw@eltorocattle.com] Sent: Friday, September 20, 2013 9:12 AM To: Reyes Romero Subject: Questions regarding 400.3



### Good Morning: We have some questions that we need answers to and trust you to be the source with the answers:

1. Does Rule 400.3 apply to all Ag Engines, No Ag Engines or only Certain Engines? (stationary, portable self propelled?

2. Is Ag required to register all engines larger than 49 HP with the district even if they are AG Exempt?

3. Are Tier 0 Engines illegal for Ag use?

4. At what stage do the different Tier’s phase out for replacement?

5. Is there any financial help for replacements?

Thanks for your reply,



### Rick Wolery

96 East Fawcett Rd.

Heber, CA 92249 760-427-7922 Cell 760-352-6312 Office 760-352-1063 Fax

rickw@eltorocattle.com – Please Note New Address



### Beef-It's What for Dinner
Before the Second Division,

December 4, 1952

No. 56964.

#### American Express Company *v.*United States,

protests 143393-K/1786 and 143398-K/1831 (Chicago).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that which was the subject of *The Midwest Waste Material Co.*and *E. J. Keller Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(28 Cust. Ct. 8, C. D. 1382), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Ford, J.,

dissented from the conclusion reached by his associates in this case for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1382, *supra.*
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001051191
<NAME> RAM ENERGY, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                      11,347,793
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                5,539,478
<ALLOWANCES>                                   351,605
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            18,052,403
<PP&E>                                     143,870,710
<DEPRECIATION>                            (18,131,494)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             150,989,289
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       11,277,771
<BONDS>                                    123,513,547
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        27,270
<OTHER-SE>                                 (5,090,594)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               150,989,289
<SALES>                                      6,761,140
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,820,017
<CGS>                                        2,327,398
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,089,879
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                              (98,281)
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,381,872
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (1,584,336)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   504,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (1,080,336)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (1,080,336)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.40)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.00
        

</TABLE>