alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                      EXHIBIT 23



                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements
(Form S-8 No. 333-74218, Form S-8 No. 333-98199 and Form S-8 No. 333-100516) of
Citizens First Bancorp, Inc. and in the related Prospectuses of our report dated
February 14, 2003, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of
Citizens First Bancorp, Inc. included in this Transition Report (Form 10-K) for
the nine months ended December 31, 2002.



/s/ Plante & Moran, PLLC
-------------------------
Plante & Moran, PLLC
Auburn Hills, Michigan
March 28, 2003
Exhibit 32







CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of FullCircle Registry, Inc. a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-KSB for the annual period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Trent Oakley, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.











/s/Trent Oakley

Trent Oakley

Chief Executive Officer and

Chief Financial Officer



Date: May 18, 2006
# C_2018022EN.01001102.xml

| 22.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/11

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 16 November 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny — Poland) — Kozuba Premium Selection sp. z o.o. v Dyrektor Izby Skarbowej w Warszawie

(Case C-308/16) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Taxation - Common system of value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Article 12(1) and (2) - Article 135(1)(j) - Taxable transactions - Exemption for the supply of buildings - Concept of ‘first occupation’ - Concept of ‘conversion’))

(2018/C 022/14)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Referring court

Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Kozuba Premium Selection sp. z o.o.

Applicant:

Defendant: Dyrektor Izby Skarbowej w Warszawie

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Articles 12(1)(a) and 135(1)(j) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as precluding a national law, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which makes the VAT exemption on the supply of buildings subject to the condition that the first occupation thereof arises in the context of a taxable transaction. The same provisions must be interpreted as not precluding such a national law from making that exemption subject to the condition, in the case of the ‘upgrade’ of an existing building, that the costs incurred have not exceeded 30 % of the initial value thereof, provided that that concept of ‘upgrade’ is interpreted in the same way as that of ‘conversion’ in Article 12(2) of Directive 2006/112, namely as meaning that the building concerned must have been subject to substantial modifications intended to modify the use or alter considerably the conditions of occupation.

---

(1)  OJ C 335, 12.9.2016.

1

---
No. 50863.

#### Protests 96760-K, etc., of Niagara Importing Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the reliquidation of the entries herein involved is similar in all material respects to that in *Bel Paese Sales Co., Inc.*v. *United States (15*Cust. Ct. 7, C. D. 932). In accordance with stipulation and following the decision cited, judgment was entered directing the collector to reliquidate the entries herein, refunding the duty established to have been taken in excess, in accordance with the decision and judgment in Abstract 45177.
DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT SERVICE
P.O. BOX 51318
PHILADELPHIA, PA 19115-6318

To All Federal Agencies For Management Letter No. 07-01
Which Fedwire Services Are May 10, 2007

Provided By The Philadelphia

Financial Center (PFC)

The Philadelphia Financial Center (PFC) is notifying its customer agencies of changes
being made to how rejected Fedwire payments are handled. Prior to the implementation
of the Secure Payment System (SPS), validation of payment data occurred after
transmission of the schedule. This resulted in some Fedwire payments being rejected by
the Federal Reserve Bank (FRB) causing manual intervention by PFC. Most problems
occurred due to an invalid bank routing transit number (RTN).

SPS has improved this process by editing your payment data to determine if RTNs are
valid. If an RTN is invalid, your data entry operator will receive a message in SPS and
the payment will not be processed. Specifically, the message will state, “Fedwire (ABA
Number) does not exist. Contact your RFC Help Desk.” PFC’s SPS Help Desk can be
reached at (215)516-8034. You should also contact the payee to ensure the accuracy of
the banking information.

This enhancement to SPS has substantially decreased the number of rejects that PFC has
received over the past few months. In the rare instance that payment data is accepted and
later rejected by the FRB, PFC will contact your agency to alert you of the problem.
Your account will be charged for the rejected payment and a credit will be posted the
next business day though the Government On-line Accounting Link System (GOALS).

This new process is effective May 18, 2007. If you have any questions regarding this
procedural change, please contact our SPS Help Desk at (215) 516-8034.

Sincerely.

MICHAEL COLARUSSO
REGIONAL DIRECTOR
PHILADELPHIA FINANCIAL CENTER
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIAID Investigator Initiated Program Project Applications (P01 Clinical Trial Not Allowed).                    

*Date:*                         December 18, 2023.                    

*Time:*                         12:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 903 South 4th Street, RML 31/3118, Hamilton, MT 59840 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Kristin L. McNally, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 903 South 4th Street, RML 31/3118, Hamilton, MT 59840,                         *mcnallyk@niaid.nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: November 7, 2023.

David W. Freeman, 

Supervisory Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-24964 Filed 11-9-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION**In connection with the Quarterly Report of Midwest Banc Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onAugust 9, 2007 (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                             /s/James J. Giancola   Name:  James J. Giancola   Title:  President and
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of ProtoKinetix, Inc., a Nevada corporation,
(the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Ross L. Senior, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify the following
pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:
 
 1.
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 2.
              The
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.
 
 /s/ Ross L.
Senior
 Ross L.
Senior
 Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
 
 May 15,
2009
NOTICE: NOT FOR OFFICIAL PUBLICATION.

UNDER ARIZONA RULE OF THE SUPREME COURT 111(c), THIS DECISION IS NOT PRECEDENTIAL

AND MAY BE CITED ONLY AS AUTHORIZED BY RULE.

IN THE

ARIZONA COURT OF APPEALS

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF ARIZONA, Respondent,

v.

KENNETH LESLIE JACKSON, Petitioner.

No. 1 CA-CR 14-0665 PRPC

Petition for Review from the Superior Court in Maricopa County

No. CR2009-177562-001

The Honorable Michael W. Kemp, Judge

REVIEW GRANTED; RELIEF DENIED

COUNSEL

Maricopa County Attorney's Office, Phoenix

By Diane Meloche

Counsel for Respondent

Kenneth Leslie Jackson, San Luis

Petitioner
STATE v. JACKSON

Decision of the Court

2

MEMORANDUM DECISION

Judge Peter B. Swann delivered the decision of the court, in which Presiding 

Judge Andrew W. Gould and Judge Patricia A. Orozco joined.

S W A N N, Judge:

¶1 Kenneth Leslie Jackson petitions this court for review from 

the dismissal of his untimely successive proceeding for post-conviction 

relief. Jackson contends that his counsel in his “of-right” post-convictionrelief proceeding was ineffective because he failed to raise an issue under

Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966). 

¶2 We grant review, but we deny relief. Jackson could have 

raised his claim in a timely second post-conviction-relief proceeding.1 See 

Ariz. R. Crim. P. 32.4(a). Further, Jackson’s “of-right” counsel could not 

have raised a Miranda issue because a plea agreement waives all nonjurisdictional defenses, errors and defects, including deprivations of 

constitutional rights that occurred before the plea. State v. Moreno, 134 Ariz. 

199, 200 (App. 1982); Tollett v. Henderson, 411 U.S. 258, 267 (1973).

 

1 A defendant is entitled to effective assistance of counsel in an “ofright” post-conviction-relief proceeding. State v. Pruett, 185 Ariz. 128, 131

(App. 1995).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

: CIVIL ACTION NOS.

:

SHIRK, et al. : 02-2635

WATSON, et al. : 02-2735

HOOD, et al. : 02-2736

HART : 02-2737

JOHNSON, et al. : 02-2738

KINIUK, et al. : 02-2845

HRYCYK, et al. : 02-3166

GREEN, et al. : 02-3168

SAKEWICZ, et al. : 02-3169

HENDRICKS, et al. : 02-3170

PALMER, et al. : 02-3171

SOLOMON, et al. : 02-3175

O’DONNELL, et al. : 02-3177

HARTMANN : 02-3448

ROCKS, JR., set al. : 02-3449

REED, III, et al. : 02-3450

GAMBLER, et al. : 02-3451

MACAULEY, et al. : 02-3452

ALIBERT : 02-3630

VISCO, et al. : 02-3631

DANCSECS, et al. : 02-3632

HAMMOND, et al. : 02-3847

POTTER, et al. : 02-3848

SMITH, et al. : 02-4095

SEARFOSS : 02-4096

GEARINGER : 02-4097

FRYE : 02-4101

MEYER, et al. : 02-4339

:

VS. :

:

HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL, :

INC. :

Case 2:02-cv-04095-ER Document 4 Filed 08/02/2002 Page 1 of 2
-2-

ORDER

AND NOW, this day of August, 2002, it is hereby

ORDERED that the above-captioned case or cases are referred to the Honorable

Charles R. Weiner for the purposes of the monitoring and the coordination of the status of

discovery, scheduling of arbitration hearings (if appropriate), settlement negotiations (if

appropriate), and scheduling trial dates (if appropriate), and it is further

ORDERED that the above-captioned case(s) shall remain on the calendar(s) of the

judge(s) to whom they were assigned at the time of filing, until further order of this court,

and, it is further 

ORDERED that counsel for defendant(s) who filed a petition for removal of the

above-captioned case(s) to this court shall serve a copy of this Order on counsel for

plaintiff(s) in the above-captioned case(s), and, it is further

ORDERED that the relevant Prothonotaries of the Courts of Common Pleas located

within the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of

Pennsylvania that the above-captioned case or cases have been removed from shall retain the

original records in these matters, pending further Order of this court.

BY THE COURT:

________________________________

JAMES T. GILES, Ch.J.

Case 2:02-cv-04095-ER Document 4 Filed 08/02/2002 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                       2,423,343
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               19,005,109<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                   410,000
<INVENTORY>                                  6,390,981
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            33,255,241
<PP&E>                                       6,205,384
<DEPRECIATION>                                 649,915
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              75,621,575
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       17,697,001
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                       573,364
<OTHER-SE>                                  31,484,212<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                75,621,575
<SALES>                                     34,818,127
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            34,818,127
<CGS>                                       22,998,898
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               10,401,630
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 7,124
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             468,086
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                942,389
<INCOME-TAX>                                   452,347
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            490,042
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   490,042
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.01
<FN>
<F1>Amount represents net accounts receivable.
<F2>Amount includes additional paid-in capital, retained earnings, and treasury
stock.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
No. 64043.

protest 59/7517 (New York).

#### American Commercial, Inc., and Freedman & Slater, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that the principles herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C.C.P.A. 112, C.A.D. 351) and that the merchandise, reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, was not in fact received by the importers. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited, it •was held that duty is not assessable upon the merchandise, which was reported by the inspector as manifested, not found. The protest was sustained to this .extent.
JOHN B. CROUSE v
. TAMARA S. COX (AC 38462) Sheldon, Beach and Harper, Js. Submitted on briefs May 23—officially released July 4, 2017

Procedural History Action to recover damages for fraud, and for other relief, brought to the Superior Court in thejudicial district of Stamford-Norwalk, where the court, Hon. Taggart D. Adams, judge trial referee, granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss and renderedjudgment thereon; subsequently, the court denied the plaintiff’s motion to reargue, and the plaintiff appealed to this court. Vacated;furtherproceedings

. John B. Crouse, self-represented, the appellant (plaintiff) filed a brief.Opinion PER CURIAM. Thejudgment ofdismissal is vacated. The case is remanded for furtherproceedings, without prejudice to the filing of a motion for summary judgment.
Ex-99.4
Schedule of Year-To-Date Principal and Interest Distributions to
Certificateholders


<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
        CLASS                 INTEREST             PRINCIPAL              LOSSES           ENDING BALANCE
        -----                 --------             ---------              ------           --------------
         
                    <c>                   <c>                  <c>                   <c>
          A1                   412,164.02         35,802,690.39                0.00                  0.00
          A2                    17,487.19          7,819,375.59                0.00                  0.00
          A3                   338,621.55         10,000,000.00                0.00                  0.00
          A4                 1,240,649.79         22,500,000.00                0.00                  0.00
          A5                 1,636,879.35          1,978,701.66                0.00         20,521,298.34
          P                          0.00             52,289.88                0.00             13,074.53
          X                    299,484.31                  0.00                0.00         29,380,691.55
          R                          0.00                  0.00                0.00                  0.00
          B1                   339,569.87             42,864.40                0.00          4,644,306.27
          B2                   121,275.98             15,308.84                0.00          1,658,694.83
          B3                    72,759.85              9,184.58                0.00            995,138.39
          B4                    48,508.96              6,123.36                0.00            663,458.31
          B5                    32,344.09              4,082.84                0.00            442,370.96
          B6                    29,806.45              1,678.94            2,403.71            442,349.93
</TABLE>
# 2017_06 Pivot Table 4

# 4

&"Calibri,Bold"&11 2017_06 MTS Table 4 Line Analysis	

&P/&N
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF HORIZON OFFSHORE, INC.
AND SUBSIDIARIES AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 1998.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                           1,452
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   40,437
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                42,820
<PP&E>                                         144,011
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (4,105)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 186,399
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           33,646
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,119
<OTHER-SE>                                      90,261
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   186,399
<SALES>                                         87,816
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                87,816
<CGS>                                           66,292
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   66,292
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,712
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,762
<INCOME-TAX>                                     3,370
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             10,392
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    10,392
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    $0.58
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    $0.58
        

</TABLE>
No. 52506.

protests 894335-G, etc. (Los Angeles and San Francisco).

#### James E. Markham, Alien Property Custodian *v.*United States,

*196Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. P68/200.

protests 65/19015, etc. (New York).

#### Isaac B. Cohen & Sons Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

Beckworth, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of so-called *1033“miniature bunting knives” similar in all material respects to those the subject of *M. Pressner & Co.*v. *United States*(56 Cust. Ct. 489, C.D. 2686), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
SOP No: SAMP PROC-5 Page 5 of 9


SOP No: SAMP PROC-5 Page 8 of 9


SOP No: SAMP PROC-5 Page 4 of 9


SOP No: SAMP PROC-5 Page 6 of 9


SOP No: SAMP PROC-5 Page 9 of 9


SOP No: SAMP PROC-5 Page 1 of 9


SOP No: SAMP PROC-5 Page 7 of 9


SOP No: SAMP PROC-5 Page 2 of 9


SOP No: SAMP PROC-5 Page 3 of 9