alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1135 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to clarify the Federal Pell 

Grant duration limits of borrowers who attend an institution of higher 

education that closes or commits fraud or other misconduct, and for 

other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 16, 2017 

Ms. WARREN (for herself, Ms. HIRONO, Mr. BROWN, and Mr. MURPHY) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the Higher Education Act of 1965 to clarify 

the Federal Pell Grant duration limits of borrowers who 

attend an institution of higher education that closes or 

commits fraud or other misconduct, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Pell Grant Restoration 

5 Act of 2017’’. 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1135 IS

1 SEC. 2. FEDERAL PELL GRANT DURATION LIMITS. 

2 Section 401(c)(5) of the Higher Education Act of 

3 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1070a(c)(5)) is amended— 

4 (1) by striking ‘‘(5) The period’’ and inserting 

5 the following: ‘‘(5) MAXIMUM PERIOD.— 

6 ‘‘(A) IN GENERAL.—Except as provided in 

7 subparagraph (B), the period’’; and 

8 (2) by adding at the end the following: 

9 ‘‘(B) EXCEPTION.— 

10 ‘‘(i) IN GENERAL.—Any Federal Pell 

11 Grant that a student received during a pe12 riod described in subclause (I) or (II) of 

13 clause (ii) shall not count towards the stu14 dent’s duration limits under this para15 graph. 

16 ‘‘(ii) APPLICABLE PERIODS.—Clause 

17 (i) shall apply with respect to any Federal 

18 Pell Grant awarded to a student to attend 

19 an institution— 

20 ‘‘(I) during a period— 

21 ‘‘(aa) for which the student 

22 received a loan under this title; 

23 and 

24 ‘‘(bb) for which the loan de25 scribed in item (aa) is forgiven 

26 under— 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1135 IS

1 ‘‘(AA) section 437(c)(1) 

2 or 464(g)(1) due to the clos3 ing of the institution; 

4 ‘‘(BB) section 455(h) 

5 due to the student’s success6 ful assertion of a defense to 

7 repayment of the loan; or 

8 ‘‘(CC) section 

9 432(a)(6), section 685.215 

10 of title 34, Code of Federal 

11 Regulations (or a successor 

12 regulation), or any other 

13 loan forgiveness provision or 

14 regulation under this Act, as 

15 a result of a determination 

16 by the Secretary or a court 

17 that the institution com18 mitted fraud or other mis19 conduct; or 

20 ‘‘(II) during a period for which 

21 the student did not receive a loan 

22 under this title but for which, if the 

23 student had received such a loan, the 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
4 

•S 1135 IS

1 student would have qualified for loan 

2 forgiveness under subclause (I)(bb).’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
January 2009 to January 2010 Schedule 

For Treasury-Disbursed Recurring Benefit Payments 

Settlement Dates 

Agency Jan’09 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct 

OPM Office of Personnel Management Civil Service Retirement/Annuity 

1/2** 2/2** 3/2** 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31** 9/1 10/1 

RRB Railroad Retirement Board Railroad Retirement/Annuity 

1/2** 2/2** 3/2** 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 8/3** 9/2** 10/1 

VA Department of Veterans Affairs Compensation and Pension 

12/31* 1/30* 2/27* 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31* 9/1 10/1 

SSA Social Security Administration 3rd of Month 

1/2* 2/3 3/3 4/3 5/1* 6/3 7/2* 8/3 9/3 10/2* 

SSA Cycle -1

 2nd Wednesday 

1/14 2/11 3/11 4/8 5/13 6/10 7/8 8/12 9/9 10/14 

SSA Cycle -2 3rd Wednesday 

1/21 2/18 3/18 4/15 5/20 6/17 7/15 8/19 9/16 10/21 

SSA Cycle -3 4th Wednesday 

1/28 2/25 3/25 4/22 5/27 6/24 7/22 8/26 9/23 10/28 

SSI Supplemental Security Income 

12/31* 1/30* 2/27* 4/1 5/1 6/1 7/1 7/31* 9/1 10/1 

. * = Settlement Date Adjusted to the Preceding Business Day ** = Settlement Date Adjusted to the Following Business Day 

Prepared by the U. S. Department of the Treasury/Fina
No. 55162.

#### Rohner Gehrig & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 162531-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

The court finding that the protest was not filed within the statutory period of 60 days after liquidation, as required by section 514, Tariff Act of 1930, the protest was dismissed.
# C_2018166EN.01001501.xml

| 14.5.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 166/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.5.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 166/15

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 March 2018 — European Commission v Czech Republic

(Case C-575/16) (1)

1

((Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Article 49 TFEU - Freedom of establishment - Notaries - Nationality requirement - Article 51 TFEU - Connection with the exercise of official authority))

(2018/C 166/18)

Language of the case: Czech

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: H. Støvlbæk and K. Walkerová, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Czech Republic (represented by: M. Smolek, T. Müller, J. Vláčil and A. Kasalická, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by imposing a nationality requirement for access to the profession of notary, the Czech Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 49 TFEU; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by imposing a nationality requirement for access to the profession of notary, the Czech Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 49 TFEU;

| 2. | Orders the Czech Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Czech Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 22, 23.1.2017.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Duska Therapeutics, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James S. Kuo, M.D., President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|                     |     |                                           
|-------------------- | --- | ------------------------------------------
|                     |     |                                           
|Date: March 31, 2009 | By: | /s/ James S. Kuo, M.D.                    
|                     |     | James S. Kuo, M.D.
Chief Executive Officer
# C_2017277EN.01001301.xml

| 21.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 277/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 277/13

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 14 June 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber) — United Kingdom) — Compass Contract Services Limited v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs

(Case C-38/16) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Value added tax (VAT) - Repayment of overpaid VAT - Right to deduct VAT - Procedures - Principles of equal treatment and fiscal neutrality - Principle of effectiveness - National legislation introducing a limitation period))

(2017/C 277/17)

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Referring court

First-tier Tribunal (Tax Chamber)

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Compass Contract Services Limited

Applicant:

Defendant: Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The principles of fiscal neutrality, equal treatment and effectiveness do not preclude national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which, in the context of the reduction of the limitation period, on the one hand, for claims for overpaid value added tax and, on the other hand, for claims for deduction of input value added tax, provides different transitional periods, with the result that claims relating to two accounting periods of three months are subject to different limitation periods depending on whether they concern the repayment of overpaid value added tax or the deduction of input value added tax.

---

(1)  OJ C 106, 21.3.2016.

1

---
## COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02 - 13 - 00417 - CV

In the Estate of Robert R. Cole, Deceased § § § § From the Probate Court of Denton County (PR

- 2009

- 00804) Jan uary 29, 2015 Opinion by Justice Gabriel 

### JUDGMENT This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there was error in part of the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial court is affirmed in par t and reversed in part

. The trial court correctly determined that whether the will put Judith Cole to an election was a question of law for the court to determine; however, the trial court erred by concluding as a matter of law that Robert R. Cole, Sr.’s will put Judit h Cole to such an election. Judith Cole did not contest the will such that the forfeiture clause was triggered; thus, the jury should not have been instructed on Judith Cole ’s affirmative defense. However, because Judith Cole did not contest the will under the forfeiture cl ause, the submission of the affirmative defense was harmless. The evidence sufficiently supported the jury’s finding that the repairs and improvements to the homestead were not capital improvements subject toreimbursement. These holdings, taken as a who le, result in our conclusion that the trial court’s judgment must be reversed in part, and we render a judgment for Judith Cole awarding her one

- half of the shares in the investment account that
were not determined to be Robert R. Cole, Sr.’s separate property. We aff irm the remainder of the trial court’s judgment. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(a), (c). It is further ordered that all parties shall bear their own costs of this appeal, for which let execution issue.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Lee Gabriel Justice Lee Gabriel
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS4657 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
# C_2017129EN.01001301.xml

| 24.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/13

---

Order of the President of the Court of 15 February 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Audiencia Provincial de A Coruña — Spain) — Abanca Corporación Bancaria SA v María Isabel Vázquez Rosende

(Case C-1/16) (1)

1

(2017/C 129/17)

Language of the case: Spanish

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 98, 14.3.2016.

1

---
No. 50352.

#### Protests 933701-G, etc., of H. C. Donaldson Co., Inc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the merchandise in question is similar in all material respects to that involved in *H. C. Donaldson Co.*v. *United States*(30 C. C. P. A. 223, C. A. D. 236), which record was admitted in evidence herein. In accordance therewith it was held that the coke is entitled to free entry and not subject to the internal revenue tax assessed.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                      66,493,873
<SECURITIES>                                23,673,178
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,993,601
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                 16,639,016
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                           108,972,571
<PP&E>                                      23,431,946
<DEPRECIATION>                              (4,639,232)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             168,121,150
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       17,147,126
<BONDS>                                      5,955,775
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        63,154
<OTHER-SE>                                 144,955,095
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               168,121,150
<SALES>                                      8,031,876
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             8,031,876
<CGS>                                        6,973,848
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                6,973,848
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            13,243,829
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             310,267
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (11,231,771)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (11,231,771)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (11,231,771)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.36)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.36)


</TABLE>
The Honorable Jean C. Hamilton, United States District Judge for the Eastern 1

District of Missouri.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 96-3351

___________

United States of America, *

*

Appellee, * Appeal from the United States

* District Court for the Eastern

v. * District of Missouri.

*

Eldon L. Fisher, Doing Business as * [Unpublished]

Medical Arts Pharmacy, *

*

Appellant. *

___________

Submitted: March 10, 1997

Filed: July 2, 1997

___________

Before FAGG, Circuit Judge, HEANEY, Senior Circuit Judge, and MORRIS

SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Eldon L. Fisher appeals from his conviction for Medicaid fraud in violation of

42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7b(a)(1)(i) and asserts that the district court erred in instructing the 1

jury, admitting certain evidence, and limiting the cross-examination of certain

witnesses. He also takes exception to the sentence that the district court imposed. After
-2-

a careful review of the record and the parties' briefs, we conclude that there was no

error. Because a thorough opinion on these matters would lack precedential value, we

affirm the trial court's judgment in all respects. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

 CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
# C_2016270EN.01001602.xml

| 25.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 270/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 270/16

---

Appeal brought on 21 January 2016 by Matratzen Concord GmbH against the judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 19 November 2015 in Case T-526/14 Matratzen Concord GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

Matratzen Concord GmbH

Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

(Case C-35/16 P)

(2016/C 270/25)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Matratzen Concord GmbH (represented by: I. Selting, Rechtsanwalt)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), Mariano Barranco Rodriguez, Pablo Barranco Schnitzler

Other parties to the proceedings:

By order of 28 April 2016, the Court of Justice of the European Union (Sixth Chamber) dismissed the appeal and ordered the appellant to bear its own costs.

---
Case No. 14,982.

#### UNITED STATES v. DONAHOO.

[1 Cranch, C. C. 474.] 1

Circuit- Court, District of Columbia.

Dec. Term, 1807.

Forcible Entry and Detainer—Where Inquest Taken—Grand Jurors.

In forcible entry and detainer, it is not necessary that it should appear upon certiorari, that the inquest was taken on the spot where the force was used: nor that the jurors should appear to be qualified according to the requisites of the common law.

[Cited in Holmead v. Smith, Case No. 6,630.]

Inquisition for forcible entry and detainer brought up by certiorari.

Mr. Morsell moved to quash the Inquisition,

because the inquest was not taken on the spot where the force is alleged to have been used, and because it did not appear that the jurors had the common-law qualifications of grand jurors; this being a proceeding at the common law.

F. S. Key, contra.

The issue is joined below on the traverse of the force, and the proceedings were there arrested by the cer-tiorari. The defendant cannot take advantage of any thing but what would avail him in arrest of judgment. The warrant to the marshal is, to summon sufficient and indifferent persons to inquire upon their oath, &e., and it does not appear on the proceedings that they were not sufficient.

1

 [Reported by Hon. William Cranch, Chief Judge.]

THE COURT

(FITZHUGH, Circuit Judge, absent)

refused to quash the inquisition on either of the grounds suggested.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 216 (Thursday, November 9, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 77261]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-24822]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[B-44-2023]


Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 49; Authorization of Production 
Activity; Getinge Group Logistics Americas LLC; (Care Products and 
Kits); Dayton, New Jersey

    On July 7, 2023, Getinge Group Logistics Americas LLC submitted a 
notification of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board for its 
facility within Subzone 49W in Dayton, New Jersey.
    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations 
of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the Federal 
Register inviting public comment (88 FR 44779, July 13, 2023). On 
November 6, 2023, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's 
decision that no further review of the activity is warranted at this 
time. The production activity described in the notification was 
authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, 
including section 400.14.

    Dated: November 6, 2023.
Elizabeth Whiteman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-24822 Filed 11-8-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report of BBCN Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) as amended by Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Kevin S. Kim, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that:





(1)    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented therein.





This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


By:/s/ KEVIN S. KIMKevin S. KimChairman, President and Chief Executive OfficerDate:  May 1, 2015
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
accompanying condensed balance sheet of Bear Island Paper Company,  L.L.C. as of
March 31,  1998 and the  related  condensed  statement  of income  for the three
months  ended March 31, 1998 and is  qualified  in its  entirety by reference to
such financial statements
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                         3,727
<SECURITIES>                                   0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  14,034
<ALLOWANCES>                                   73
<INVENTORY>                                    13,230
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               31,068
<PP&E>                                         196,096
<DEPRECIATION>                                 3,321
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 232,121
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          13,566
<BONDS>                                        191,625
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          0
<PREFERRED>                                    0
<COMMON>                                       0
<OTHER-SE>                                     26,929
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   232,121
<SALES>                                        30,380
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               30,416
<CGS>                                          22,675
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  1,187
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             4,881
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                1,672
<INCOME-TAX>                                   0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            1,672
<DISCONTINUED>                                 0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                0
<CHANGES>                                      0
<NET-INCOME>                                   1,672
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0
        

</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bayou City Exploration, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Morris T. Hewitt, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Morris T. Hewitt
-------------------------------------
Morris T. Hewitt
President and Chief Executive Officer
November 11, 2005