alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



EXHIBIT 99.2

The following certification is provided by the undersigned Chief Financial
Officer of Midwest Banc Holdings, Inc. on the basis of such officers knowledge
and belief as of the date hereof for the sole purpose of complying with 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.

CERTIFICATION

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Midwest Banc Holdings, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended September 30, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 16, 2003(the Report), I,
Daniel R. Kadolph, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) |  | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and                   
| | --- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| | (2) |  | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

| |  |                       |  |                                                  
| |  | --------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------
| |  | /s/ Daniel R. Kadolph
| |  |                      
| |  | Name:                 |  | Daniel R. Kadolph                                
| |  | Title:                |  | Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
| |  | Date:                 |  | April 16, 2003
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas** 

November 6, 2013

No. 04

- 13

- 00404

- CV

IN RE The ESTATE OF Alberto TREVIÑO , Jr.

Original Mandamus Proceedings 1

ORDER

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez , Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez , Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa , Justice

The court has considered the Motion for En Banc Reconsideration filed on behalf of the

real party in interest on October 7, 2013 and the motion is DENIED.

It is s o ORDERED on November 6th, 2013.

_____________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 6 th day of November, 2013

.

_____________________________ Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. P

- 01796 , styled In re the Estate of Alberto Trevi ñ o, Jr. , pending in the

County Court

, Zapata County, Texas, the Honorable Joe Rathmell presiding.
IPAC Operational Metrics for November 2021

‘Volume by Transaction Type

Dollar Amount] % of Total Dollar Amount] Number of Transactions] _ % of Total Number of Transactions|
Fiduciary (Investment & Borrowing) 11,924,812, 103,056| 39.62%| 20,344| 17.19%]
[Buy/Sell '36,107,430,770| (0.30%| 36,685 81.70%
Benefits (RITS) 8,642,255,730] 0.07% 463 0.39%
[Check Aftermath (TRACS) 182,534,634] 0.00% 351
Zero Dollar | 0.00% o
[Grand Total - November 2021 11,969,744,324,191| 100.00%| 718,343]
[Grand Total - October 2021 13,571,282,409,996| 100.00%| 105,366|
[October to November Change 601,538,085, 805|
Percentage Change -11.8%| po 23
|Grand Total - November 2020 16,446,447,003,921| a)
Nov 2020 to Nov 2021 Change -4,476,702,679,730) po 32,803]
eee -27.2%| po a2 as]
Case No. 5,261.

#### GARRETSON v. LINGAN.

[2 Cranch, C. C. 236.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

April Term, 1821.

Slavekt — Removal—Lapse op Time.

Length of time does not raise a presumption against a slave, that his owner took the oath required by law.

*47Petition for freedom. The petitioner [Jack Garretson, a negro] was carried, by his owner, from Maryland to Virginia, in the year 1784, and kept there several years, and then brought back to Maryland. By the law of Virginia of 17th of December, 1702 (page ISO), the slave was entitled to his freedom, unless the owner took a certain oath within sixty days after his removal to Virginia.

Mr. Ivey and Mr. Caldwell, for defendant,

moved the court to instruct the jury, that after such a lapse of time they have a right to presume that the oath was duly taken agreeably to law. The law did not require that there should be any record of the taking of the oath. It is a fact which may be proved by parol. Judge White in Virginia has decided in favor of the presumption.

Mr. Taney and Mr. Jones, contra,

stated that there is a contrary decision in 5 Munf. 542, and that Judge Dade had decided in the same way. The presumption could arise only from the acquiescence of the petitioner; but that presumption is rebutted by the state of slavery in which he has been held, which disabled him from asserting his rights.

THE COURT

(CRANCH, Chief Judge,

doubting) refused to give the instruction.
fel

P.O. Box 1602
South Bend, indiana 46634

September 22, 1999

Ms. Cynthia L. Johnson, Director

Cash Management Policy & Planning Division
Financial Management Services, Room 420
401 14th Street SW

Washington, D.C. 20227

RE: Proposed rule change regarding the rate of interest charged TT&L

Dear Ms. Johnson:

Thank you for this opportunity to comment on the Treasury proposal to change the
definition of the “Treasury Tax and Loan (TT&L) rate of interest” from the Federal
Funds rate less 25 basis points to a volume-weighted average overnight repurchase
agreement rate.

Your proposal states “Since 1990, however, the average difference between the two
rates has been only approximately 2 basis points (2 hundredths of one percentage
point)’. Based on this small difference, we question the need for the change. Your
proposal requires another index to be monitored by the FRBNY and by each note
option bank.

Since we currently do not actively participate in the repurchase agreement market,
there is no need for the bank to monitor this index. However, we do actively participate
in the overnight federal funds market. In addition, it has been our experience that
historically our spread has not averaged 25 basis points below our cost of federal
funds. This is due to one factor, that is, our federal funds rates do not mirror the weight
average effective federal funds rate as computed by the Federal reserve Bank of New
York. Nonetheless, we know, understand and monitor the federal funds rate bench
mark.

Therefore, we do not support the change from the bench mark federal funds rate to the
overnight repurchase agreement rate.


Ms. Cynthia L. Johnson, Director
page 2

Further, the change to an overnight repurchase agreement rate will add an element of
basis point risk to the daily transactions. As a result we will have to reassess our
status as a note option bank. We are unable to determine how this will alter our
participation, until we have analyzed the daily basis point risk between the overnight
repurchase program and the overnight federal funds rates. Also, pending the
acceptance by other participating note option banks, this proposed change could alter
the amount of liquidity in the system and the overnight federal funds rate.

You further request our interest in obtaining note balances for a guaranteed term. Your
request for comment does not define the length of the term nor does it outline the
procedures for obtaining term note balances. Currently, we do not rely on the funds for
more than one day in our liquidity calculation due to the uncertainty of the daily amount
of the note balance. While there is a benefit to having a set term, the amount
available, rate and term will have to be measured against other funding that is available
to our institution.

We appreciate this opportunity to express our views.

Sincerely,

Lameo Michio

/ James $7 Jackson
Senior Vice President
Chief Investment Officer
Funds Management Division

cc: Ronald J. Piatek
TT&L Manager
Federal reserve Bank Chicago
• Order/prepare only one meal for each child for

each meal service.

• Count the meals as they are received.

• Check the meals to be sure you have received 

all menu items and that none of the items are

damaged or spoiled, and sign the delivery

receipt.

• Clean the site before you serve the meal.

• Put up the approved nondiscrimination poster.

• Serve the meal only during the assigned time

period.

• Prepare and serve the meal according to State 

and local health and safety standards.

• Serve each child all menu items at one time.

• Count the meals as they are given out.

• Count second meals separately, if your sponsor

allows seconds. Second meals must be served 

as complete units.

• Complete the daily records in a timely manner.

Keep them in a safe place away from the children and the weather.

• Clean the site after the meal.

• Encourage the children to try new foods, and 

minimize food waste.

Site Supervisor’s

Pocket Reference Guide

Summer Food Service

Program for Children

DO . . .

Food That’s In When School Is Out!
• Serve second meals until all children at the

site have been served one complete meal.

• Serve meals with missing components.

• Serve meals to parents or other adults from

the community, unless allowed by your sponsor.

• Sign meal receipts until all meals are carefully

counted and checked.

• Allow discrimination against any child because

of race, color, national origin, sex, age, or

handicap.

• Forget to have each meal service supervised

by a person trained in the operation of the 

program.

• Hesitate to contact your sponsor if you have

concerns.

United States Department of Agriculture

Food and Nutrition Service

FNS 281

March 1992 / Revised March 1998

Reviewed and approved for reprinting April 2001

Sponsor’s Name

Sponsor’s Telephone Number

Food Supplier’s Name

Food Supplier’s Telephone Number

Site Supervisor’s Name

DON’T . . .
Comment Info: ================= General Comment:Office of Aviation Enforcement and Proceedings-Regulation of Voice Calls from Mobile Wireless Devices on Aircraft, Department of Transportation Advisory Committee for Aviation Consumer Protection
### IN THE COURT OF CRIMI NAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOX VILLE A ssi gne d onBr ie fs S ep te m be r 22, 200 9
STA TE OF TEN NES SEE v. WILLIAM J. WILS ON Appeal f rom the Circ uit Court for Bledsoe Coun ty No. 71-2006 J. Curt is Smith, Judge

No. E2009-00772-CC A-R3- CD - F iled Dece m ber 29, 2009

D. KEL L Y T HOMAS , J R . , J
. , co n cu rr i n g.
Ijoi n in the re su lts re a c he d b y

the ma jor ity ins of ar a s w e do no t ha

ve an ad e qu a te re c or d in which to re view the pa

rticulars of

the Def endant’ s case . Iwrite sepa rate ly to expres s m y

conce rn that th e pr ob a tio n r

ule in q ue sti on , if

a pp lie d to a ll p ro batio ne rs , o ff e nd s d ue pr ocess . T he ru le prohibits contact or a ssociation with any adults who have mi n o r ch i ldren. The brea dth of such a pr oh ibi tio n is pr ob le matic and the re latio ns hip of

the pro hi bitio n to the g oa ls o f p ro batio n is questionable.

Probatio n ary

t erm s ar e gu i d edb y

T en n es s ee C o d e A n n o t at eds ec t i o n4 0 -3 5 -303, which states in pertinent part that “the court shall specify the terms of supe rvision and may require the offe nder to comply with cer tain conditions.” § 40-35-303( d). The statute then states seve ral c onditions t hat the trial court may impose on the Def endant in addition to “any other c onditions reasonably related to t he purp os e of

the of fe nd e r’ s se nte nc e .” § 40- 35 -3 03 (d )( 9) . T he se un sp e c if ie d c on dit ion s mu st not be “unduly

restric tive of the off

ender ’s liberty , or incompatible with the offe nder’ s fre edom of2

co n s ci en ce . ” Id. ; s ee al s o S t at e v . M at h es , 1 1 4 S
. W
. 3 d 9 1 5 (T en n . 2 0 0 3 ) ( h o l d i n g th at re qu i ri n g a defe ndant to leg itimate her da ug hter a s a condition of probat i o n was not reasonably related to her sentenc e for

her a g g r a v a te d a s sault conviction); State v. J oshua Will iam Alg ood, No. M2004-00535- C C A- R 3 -C D, 2 0 0 5 W L8 3 9 2 9 8 , * 3 (T en n . C ri m . Ap p . Ap r. 1 8 , 2 0 0 5 ) ( h o l d i n g t h at re qu i ri n g a de fe nd ant t o e sta

bli sh pate rn ity of his c hil dr e n w a s n ot r e a so nab ly rel a te d to his se nte nc e fo r h is ag g ravated burg lary

and thef t convictions).

Given the state of the re cord, the validity o f the probation rule in this case c annot be deter mined. This conclusion must not be taken as a pproval, tac it or otherwise, of the probation rule.

D. KEL L Y THOMAS, JR ., J UDGE
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Integrated
Healthcare Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2006,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company at the dates and for the period indicated.

     This Certificate has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.


Dated: November 2, 2006                    By:  /s/ Steven R. Blake
                                                -------------------
                                                Steven R. Blake
                                                Chief Financial Officer


                                       41
IV 

House Calendar No. 161 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 971 

[Report No. 115–791] 

Providing for consideration of the resolution (H. Res. 970) insisting that 

the Department of Justice fully comply with the requests, including 

subpoenas, of the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and the 

subpoena issued by the Committee on the Judiciary relating to potential 

violations of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act by personnel of 

the Department of Justice and related matters. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 27, 2018 

Mr. COLLINS of Georgia, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following 

resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the resolution (H. Res. 970) 

insisting that the Department of Justice fully comply 

with the requests, including subpoenas, of the Permanent 

Select Committee on Intelligence and the subpoena 

issued by the Committee on the Judiciary relating to 

potential violations of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act by personnel of the Department of Justice 

and related matters. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 971 RH 

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it 

2 shall be in order without intervention of any point of order 

3 to consider in the House the resolution (H. Res. 970) in4 sisting that the Department of Justice fully comply with 

5 the requests, including subpoenas, of the Permanent Se6 lect Committee on Intelligence and the subpoena issued 

7 by the Committee on the Judiciary relating to potential 

8 violations of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act by 

9 personnel of the Department of Justice and related mat10 ters. The resolution shall be considered as read. The pre11 vious question shall be considered as ordered on the reso12 lution and preamble to adoption without intervening mo13 tion or demand for division of the question except one hour 

14 of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and 

15 ranking minority member of the Committee on the Judici16 ary or their respective designees. 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS

sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
House Calendar No. 161 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 971 

[Report No. 115–791] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the resolution (H. 

and related matters. Act by personnel of the Department of Justice lations of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance mittee on the Judiciary relating to potential vioIntelligence and the subpoena issued by the Compoenas, of the Permanent Select Committee on tice fully comply with the requests, including subRes. 970) insisting that the Department of JusJUNE 27, 2018 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
financial statements included in this report and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999             MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         691,074                 170,583
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                3,196,375               2,437,005
<ALLOWANCES>                                 (320,000)               (365,000)
<INVENTORY>                                  3,244,744               4,359,072
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             7,902,518               6,836,661
<PP&E>                                         391,094                 478,014
<DEPRECIATION>                                (90,690)               (173,026)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              10,072,210               9,468,418
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        5,674,428               5,415,818
<BONDS>                                         12,201                  22,697
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                           409                     422
<OTHER-SE>                                   3,695,315               3,691,141
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                10,072,210               9,467,418
<SALES>                                      3,147,373               2,218,263
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,147,373               2,218,263
<CGS>                                        2,192,272               1,444,262
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                2,192,272               1,444,262
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               792,279               1,070,428
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                  15,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             157,109                  53,963
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 17,642               (345,376)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    27,400                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (9,758)               (345,376)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (42,740)               (335,773)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.01)                  (0.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)                  (0.08)



</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

: CIVIL ACTION NOS.

:

ABBOTT : 02-3883

MCDANIEL, et al. : 02-3906

MENDOZA : 02-3955

MEYER : 02-3987

KUEHL, et al. : 02-4134

QUITASOL, et al. : 02-4209

MONTANEZ, et al. : 02-4254

DIEBERT, et al. : 02-4323

:

:

VS. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION, et al. :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of July, 2002, the Court having been previously

advised that the above action cannot proceed to trial and disposition because of the following

reason:

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending disposition of a related

action.

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending determination of

arbitration proceedings.

[ ] - Interlocutory appeal filed.

[ X ] - Other: Case is placed into suspense pending receipt of the Case

Transfer Order from the Judicial Panel on Multi District Litigation

transferring case to District of Minnesota..

It is

ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this action closed for statistical purposes and

place the matter in the Civil Suspense File, and it is

Case 2:02-cv-04209-CRW Document 2 Filed 07/10/2002 Page 1 of 2
FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction; and that the case be

restored to the trial docket when the action is in a status so that it may proceed to final

disposition; this order shall not prejudice the rights of the parties to this litigation.

BY THE COURT:

________________________________________

Charles R. Weiner, Judge

Case 2:02-cv-04209-CRW Document 2 Filed 07/10/2002 Page 2 of 2
No. 60756.

#### P. John Hanrahan, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 280043-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
No. 66251.

#### D. Hauser, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 61/254 (New York).

*388Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of plastic teeth similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 62180, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.