alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### Summary of Changes to Rule 2.0

, Open Burning

Note: Minor changes such as spelling and numbering were not included below.

Substantial proposed changes are shown in underline to indicate additions

and strikethrough to indicate deletions compared to the originally proposed draft rule

submitted on May 1, 2008

.



## Rule **2.0** OPEN BURNING

* * * * *

**E. DEFINITIONS**  **:**

E .1 **Agricultural Burning** means:

(a) open outdoor of fires used in agricultural

operations in the growing of crops or raising of fowl or

animals, including burning empty paper containers of

agricultural chemicals

E.12 **Paper Containers of Agricultural Chemicals** means sacks

or other receptacles that are made predominately of

paper and manufactur ed to contain pesticides,

fertilizer, or toxic substances, and emptied and used in

the field for purposes intimately associated with the

growing and harvesting of crops.

**H. OPEN BURNING PERMITS**

H.2 **Exemptions to Permit Requirements.** The following are

exempt from a District permit until proper public notice to

remove the exemption is filed. Other permitting

requirements from the fire protection services may be

required.

(a) The open burning of paper agricultural pesticide

sacks, provided the burning is conducted at the site

of application, in accordance with proper disposal

guidelines specified on the packaging and downwind

from any person or susceptible crops.

**J. AGRICULTURAL BURNING** 

J.4 **Paper Containers of Agricultural Chemicals** : The open

burning of paper containers of agricultural chemicals must

be conducted in accordance with California Environmental

Protection Agency’s Department of Pesticide Regulation’s

Guidelines for Emptying and Burning of Pesticide Bags,

including burnin g at the site of application, in accordance

with proper disposal guidelines specified on the packaging

and downwind from any person or susceptible crops.



### * * * * *
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

AMERICAN EQUIPMENT LEASING : 

a division of EAB LEASING CORP., : 

 Plaintiff : 

 : 

vs. : Civil Action 

 : 

SALEEM SIDDIQI aka SALEEM R. SIDDLEL, indiv., : 

RAMALINGA PRASAD ADUSUMALLI aka : 

RAMALINA P. ADUSOMACCI, individually : 

PRASAD NANNAPANENI, individually, and : 

SRINIVAS NANNAPANENI aka : No. 02-cv-2758 

SRINIVAS RAO NANNAPANENI aka : 

SRINIVAS NANNAPANEN, individually, : 

 Defendants :

ORDER

 AND NOW, this ____ day of ________, 2003, upon consideration of the motion of the 

plaintiff to reopen this matter for the sole purpose of entering judgment against the 

defendants in accordance with the terms of this Court’s Order of January 14, 2003 and 

Stipulation entered into between the parties, it is hereby ORDERED and DECREED that the 

motion is GRANTED. 

 FURTHER ORDERED that final judgment be and hereby is entered in favor of the 

plaintiff and against the defendants, Prasad Nannapaneni AND Srinivas Nannapaneni, 

individually, jointly and severally, in the sum of $35,276.96, together with interest from the 

date of judgment and costs of suit. 

BY THE COURT: 

 

 PETRESE B. TUCKER, U.S.D.J. 

Case 2:02-cv-02758-PBT Document 13-6 Filed 07/28/2003 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

LINDA LYNCH

: CIVIL ACTION

:

vs. :

: NO. 02-4354

HOWARD SCHULTZ & ASSOCIATES

O R D E R

AND NOW, TO WIT: This 5TH day of September, 2003,

it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above action has been settled

and upon Order of the Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1(b) of the Local Rules of

Civil Procedure of this Court , it is

ORDERED that the above action is DISMISSED with prejudice, pursuant to

agreement of counsel without costs.

MICHAEL E. KUNZ, Clerk of Court

BY: 

Marie O’Donnell 

 Deputy Clerk

Civ 2 (8/2000)

41(b).frm

Case 2:02-cv-04354-AB Document 21 Filed 09/05/2003 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

__________________________________________

:

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA :

 :

v. : CRIMINAL NO. 04-489

:

NORVEL VAS, :

Defendant. :

__________________________________________:

ORDER

AND NOW, this 13th day of October, 2009, upon consideration of Defendant’s

Petition for “Equitable Tolling” Due to Appellant’s Counsel or Any Court Failure to Notify

Appellant of the Denial of Petition for Writ of Certiorari from the U.S. Supreme Court [Doc. No.

201] and the Government’s Opposition to Defendant’s Petition [Doc. No. 202], it is hereby

ORDERED that Defendant’s Petition is DISMISSED for the reasons stated in the attached

Memorandum.

It is so ORDERED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Cynthia M. Rufe

______________________

CYNTHIA M. RUFE, J.

Case 2:04-cr-00489-CMR Document 204 Filed 10/13/09 Page 1 of 1
---

Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Alternet Systems,
  Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003 as
  filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
  each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below,
  hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to their knowledge:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements
        of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                      
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                    
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report
        fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
        results of operation of the Company.

|Dated: March 26, 2004 | By: | /s/ Michael Dearden                         
|--------------------- | --- | --------------------------------------------
|                      |     | Michael Dearden                             
|                      |     | President and Director                      
|                      |     |                                             
|Dated: March 26, 2004 | By: | /s/ Griffin Jones                           
|                      |     | Griffin Jones                               
|                      |     | Treasurer, Principal Accounting Officer, CEO
|                      |     | Secretary & Director                        

---
|  Subsidiary             |   | Country of Incorporation |
|------------------------------|--------|--------------------------|
| Fibesa S.A.                  |   | Argentina                |
| Emprendimiento Recoleta S.A. |   | Argentina                |
| Shopping Neuquén S.A.   |   | Argentina                |
| Panamerican Mall S.A.        |   | Argentina                |
| Arcos del Gourmet S.A.       |   | Argentina                |
| Conil S.A.                   |   | Argentina                |
| Torodur S.A.                 |   | Uruguay                  |
| Apsamedia S.A.               |   | Argentina                |
| Nuevo Puerto Santa Fe S.A.   |   | Argentina                |
| Quality Invest S.A.          |   | Argentina                |

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ROBERT ROHRER, : CIVIL ACTION

:

Petitioner, : NO. 04-3986

:

v. :

:

PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION :

AND PAROLE, ET AL., :

:

Respondents. :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 1st day of August, 2005, upon

consideration of the Report and Recommendation of United States

Magistrate Judge Arnold C. Rapoport (doc. no. 8), and with no

objections to the Report and Recommendation having been filed, it

is hereby ORDERED as follows:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and

ADOPTED;

2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2254, is DENIED and DISMISSED;

3. A Certificate of Appealability is NOT GRANTED, due

to a lack of probable cause; and 

4. Petitioner’s motion for appointment of counsel and

extension of time (doc. no. 7) is DENIED.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

 

EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, J.

Case 2:04-cv-03986-ER Document 9 Filed 08/01/05 Page 1 of 1
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Election focus 2004**
 
January:14th | 21st | 28th
February:2nd | 18th
March:3rd
April:1st | 14th | 28th
May:19th
June:16th
July:14th
October:19th
November:4th
 
SuDoc Number:S 20.2:EL 2/
Item Number:0900-E (online)
CGP systemNumber:000596123
 
February 18, 2020
September 6, 1962

Reap. Dec. 10332.

#### Harper, Robinson & Co., a/c Imperial International Corp. *v.*United States,

Motion by plaintiff.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 21

- 00492

- CR

The STATE of Texas,

Appellant

v.

Michael David SEGURA

, Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 13

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 605001

Honorable Rosie S. Gonzalez , Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARTINEZ

, JUSTICE CHAPA , AND JUSTICE VALENZUELA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is

REVERSED, and the cause is REMANDED to the trial court for further pr oceedings consistent

with this court’s opinion.

SIGNED July 20, 2022.

_____________________________ Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice
EXHIBIT 10.4

June 6, 2005


Messrs:           Larry B. Anderson
                  Bruce Mogel
                  James T. Ligon

           Re:    Letter of Amendment to Employment Agreements

Dear Sirs:

This is to confirm the amendment to your respective Employment Agreements, dated
February 22, 2005, as a result of the June 1, 2005, Amended Stock Purchase
Agreement between Integrated Healthcare Holdings, Inc. (IHHI) and the Orange
County Physicians Investment Network (OC-PIN). (A complete and executed copy of
that Agreement is attached hereto as Exhibit A.)

By virtue of that Agreement your Employment Agreements are amended in sections
5.2 and 5.3, to provide that,

There shall be a 3-year severance payment (instead of 1-year currently provided
for), payable in a lump sum at employees request, if any of the three of you are
terminated without cause or if any of the three of you resign for good cause.
The severance amount shall be three years' compensation beginning from the date
of this Agreement, (June 1, 2005) and shall be reduced by one month for each
month employed thereafter. However, the severance shall not be reduced to less
than 12 months. For the purposes of this Amendment, "good cause" shall mean that
OC-PIN has requested an executive to engage in an illegal act or violation of
any law, rule, regulation or accounting principle applicable to IHHI (each, a
"Violation"), that IHHI's counsel or auditors has confirmed that such request is
a Violation and OC-PIN persists in making the request following receipt of
notice of the improper nature of the request.

Additionally, the Form of Severance Agreement applicable to your Employment
Agreement is hereby modified to the Form included herewith and made a part
hereof as Exhibit B.



           June 9, 2005                     /s/ Anil V. Shah
----------------------------------          ------------------------------------
Date                                        Anil V. Shah
                                            Chairman of the Board of IHHI
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PRSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARABANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly report of Rosedale Decorative Products, Ltd.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Norman Maxwell, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

     (3)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (4)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



/s/ Norman Maxwell
Norman Maxwell
Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer

November 14, 2002
# C_2016243EN.01005201.xml

| 4.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 243/52 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 243/52

---

Action brought on 5 April 2016 – ZZ v EIB

(Case F-19/16)

(2016/C 243/57)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: A. Senes et L. Payot, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Investment Bank (EIB)

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Reimburse the applicant, with interest, for the alleged loss of her pensionable rights or, in the alternative, reinstate, with interest, the pensionable rights allegedly lost by her in the national system, when those rights were transferred to the defendant’s pension scheme.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Condemn the European Investment Bank to restore the prejudice that the applicant has suffered for the loss of her pensionable rights in the amount of EUR 55 641,17, plus interest accrued at the applicable rate calculated retroactively, as if the original transfer was done for the full amount of her pensionable rights existing with Istituto Nazionale della Previdenza Sociale, when the original request of transfer was done; |
| --- | --- |

—

Condemn the European Investment Bank to restore the prejudice that the applicant has suffered for the loss of her pensionable rights in the amount of EUR 55 641,17, plus interest accrued at the applicable rate calculated retroactively, as if the original transfer was done for the full amount of her pensionable rights existing with Istituto Nazionale della Previdenza Sociale, when the original request of transfer was done;

| — | In the alternative, condemn EIB to perform the immediate return in pensionable months to ZZ of EUR 55 641,17, plus interest accrued at the applicable rate calculated retroactively as if the original transfer was done for the full amount of her pension rights existing with Istituto Nazionale della Previdenza Sociale. In this case, it is suggested, calculations should be made under article 71.1.1. of the EIB's Staff Pension Scheme Regulations; |
| --- | --- |

—

In the alternative, condemn EIB to perform the immediate return in pensionable months to ZZ of EUR 55 641,17, plus interest accrued at the applicable rate calculated retroactively as if the original transfer was done for the full amount of her pension rights existing with Istituto Nazionale della Previdenza Sociale. In this case, it is suggested, calculations should be made under article 71.1.1. of the EIB's Staff Pension Scheme Regulations;

| — | condemn EIB to support all such further relief as the Tribunal considers just; |
| --- | --- |

—

condemn EIB to support all such further relief as the Tribunal considers just;

| — | condemn EIB to support the costs of the present proceedings, which are estimated as EUR 3 000. |
| --- | --- |

—

condemn EIB to support the costs of the present proceedings, which are estimated as EUR 3 000.

---
Jonathan B. Hill

+1 202 776 2725

jhill@cooley.com VIA EMAIL TRANSMISSION

1299 PENNSYLVANIA AV ENUE, NW, SUITE 700, WASHINGTON, DC 20004

- 2400 T: (202) 842

- 7800 F: (202) 842

- 7899 WWW.COOLEY.COM April 1 5 , 2015

U. S. Department of Transportation

Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave., SE

Washington, DC 20590

Re: FAA Docket 2015

- 0107

- 0001 (Building 10, LLC)

Dear Sir or Madam:

Enclosed for inclusion in the referenced docket is a confidential filing made on behalf of Building

10, LLC of its motion picture and television operations manual. It is requested that this manual

not be included in the public record and it be mai ntained as confidential as it is not

distributed to the public by Building 10, LLC. It contains proprietary and confidential business

information.

Should you have any questions concerning this, please contact the undersigned.

Sincerely yours,

Jonathan B. Hill

Counsel for Building 10, LLC

Encl.

cc: Ja m es W illi a m s

R obe r t P appas

Jake Troutman

Thuy Cooper

D ean G r i f f i t h

, E s q.
Page 1 L E A D ∙ T R A N S F O R M ∙ D E L I V E R

The Federal FM strategy will enable CFOs to succeed through three major 

priorities

Enable via access to new skills and capabilities

Federal financial managers will 

modernize financial operations and provide insight and 

leadership to improve agency efficiency and performance 

Reduce

low-value financial 

reports and 

requirements

Innovate

through analytics and 

next gen technology 

to drive value

Digitize

end-to-end processes 

to improve 

efficiencies and 

citizen experience
The Honorable Susan Webber Wright, United States District Judge for the

1

Eastern District of Arkansas.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 97-1648

___________

United States of America, *

 *

Appellee, *

 * Appeal

from the United States

v. *

District Court for the

 *

Eastern District of Arkansas.

Troy A. Moore, *

 *

Appellant. *

[UNPUBLISHED]

___________

 Submitted: October 7, 1997

 Filed: October 15,

1997

___________

Before WOLLMAN, LOKEN, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

___________

PER CURIAM.

After Troy A. Moore pleaded guilty to distributing

cocaine base in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1), the

district court sentenced him to 121 months imprisonment 1

and five years supervised release. Moore appeals,

arguing that the district court erred in finding he was
-2-

willing to sell cocaine base, as opposed to cocaine

powder, to a confidential informant for the Little Rock

Police Department (LRPD); he also complains that the LRPD

set up two controlled buys from him after he initially

fronted
-3-

drugs to the confidential informant. We affirm.

We conclude that the district court did not err. See

United States v. Stavig, 80 F.3d 1241, 1245 (8th Cir.

1996) (standard of review). The evidence presented at

sentencing and credited by the district court shows that

Moore provided the confidential informant with cocaine

base even though the informant did not specify on that

occasion that he wanted cocaine base rather than cocaine

powder. Cf. United States v. Lenfesty, 923 F.2d 1293,

1300 (8th Cir.) (finding no sentencing entrapment where

subject of investigation elicited predisposition to

provide any quantity demanded). Furthermore, the LRPD

officer who set up the controlled buys testified that the

LRPD had engaged in a second buy in order to identify

Moore&s source. See United States v. Shephard, 4 F.3d

647, 649 (8th Cir. 1993) (police may “continue to deal

with someone with whom they have already engaged in

illicit transactions in order to . . . #trace the drug

deeper into the distribution hierarchy&”).

Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the district

court.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
Case 2:04-cv-05510-JS Document 78 Filed 02/08/07 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:04-cv-05510-JS Document 78 Filed 02/08/07 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

SYDNEY BRADSHAW : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. :

INS : NO. 02-4268

ORDER

AND NOW, this Day of August, 2002, leave is granted Petitioner

to proceed in forma pauperis, for the purpose of all proceedings in this court and also for

purposes of filing of a notice of appeal.

 

CLIFFORD SCOTT GREEN, J.

Case 2:02-cv-04268-CG Document 4 Filed 08/07/2002 Page 1 of 1
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS AND CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUL-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             AUG-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-30-2000
<CASH>                                           3,982
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   58,644
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    218,774
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               363,886
<PP&E>                                       1,148,132<F1>
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               3,816,683
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                        4,178,252
<BONDS>                                      2,225,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              378
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        38,501
<OTHER-SE>                                 (2,625,448)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 3,816,683
<SALES>                                        150,351
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               199,200
<CGS>                                                0<F2>
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                3,499,932
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,326,879
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (4,627,611)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (4,627,611)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (4,627,611)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.14)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.14)
<FN>
<F1>Net of depreciation and amortization.
<F2>Not calculated.
</FN>


</TABLE>