alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
700 

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS 

AUSTIN 
Hon. u6lter C* waoawara, - paE;e, 2 

few sol’ tho ourrent fisti bLtmdtm, you 6x-e odrisea 

that uo adhero to the eoncludon heretofore yessed 

in our op%nlon tie. o-117sr as iollows: 

*Iiere we have no a pcoprlabthn but 

what appe6m pcroly a all-e ation to tale 

togi8laturs lteelf to later make the ap 

It is @te true, in this oomeotlon, that the 

infen& of the law le the law 

the 6ourta Ere reW&, Sn 

Cullgently for the intfM%On Of tb 

efhen the infeat %.a plainly 

the etatuta, It oust be g.W 

Ill OUF O@lhll, the &l&d8t 

pro~tion shaula be Imae in the aepartmontal agJpc@atd.cukb~ie plljslJsabalearly e3cgaWssad infbolfw$Wg0 

uotja in the onaoat abwe quotea, anu thwefara we 6re 

not at liberty to resort to wx3truetion~ 

sl~~ture, it is 

tiens for the 
BOIL. alter C. Iloocluara - page a 

the 

etatutes 

went tBe 6tWiutea of t&e 8*rte of TM 

a thmt ally amountj seer or fmdo 

epprogwlatadtabe paSa out of 

loaal or epaaialfees or fur&, that the 

mmebe 80 pa&l out of the saldloaalo 

epeohl Sees or funb Snetoetl of 

pa&l out of beinff the gensml Mtae hmb. 

Thoefseetofth&Ii6topw¶dethatiifbo 

of-the State of PycaapeUdy+o +a1 0~ ape&& 

Se00 or fimtm to me PaJment of 0ertaln items of "p"""' 

amnmts approga-iat66 for payment OS suah items ahal ba 

P 

fratheuddqeoialorleoalSeemmimdm~ If 

eappwp4.atlonisfP0mtheg~fMd~aadthe 

etatute dedicates lwal or spaojal faas or fuailato tha 

payment of SudI lteme, the pj?tieII quoted opermtee te 

apply mal lO@xLl Gr rpcwisl feelI OS- funafI foosrd fbe pEyBeat of wah apprapPlcb~befetorcraart~lmybabdfo 

%t"~ttii?& g~erpss aihauld be gel& Mly trolr 

AI& ip the statutea eho?lld xpvnide 

dedlaate&laa8lorqeainlreesor~,thicr quoted 

pwwoa would operato to .xw&re the poJment Of aaain$s 

appvo)rAataa far l5uah itaI%e tmaluaofvely frml sa%d loa8z 

or spa&ilfeoe or funds, inafaad oftrcwthe genf3ral 

SUM. 

Inother uord.s,itwemethotthlsriaa 

~isionwas ZntSnaaaby fhebeg5sl~ture as ablanket 

p?oo;lau5a oorreet5ng *pproprSatSoao lnskivertently medo fro01 

the general Sunl Mwaw epswiol See0 or Asrde are waSIable fer their amd epproprbt5oue lnadv~ent1 

Bade fmm only 1Seeorfumlwheretheatalbu ?e 6 

of the State a 

or spooial See 

the applUat;lon of other loea 

Ipopr5atlom ae well‘. 

tWWd the pO=t Of 8tWh Sp. 

coourtrylnk the prwl~ quoted abwo srfm 

sr B. 80s. 404 aryf 42'1 togethfsr, we are OS the ophioa 

that it use the lee;lslntive intent ta mi* that the 
703
EXHIBIT 13.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with this Amendment to the Annual Report for Fiscal 2008 Ended August 31, 2008 of Golden Goliath Resources Ltd., a company organized under the British Columbia Corporations Act(the Company) on Form 20-F as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, J. Paul Sorbara, President and Director of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ J. Paul Sorbara

J. Paul Sorbara, President/Director





Date: July 21, 2009





#
# United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604

September 30 , 20 20

Before

WILLIAM J. BAUER

, Circuit Judge

MICHAEL S. KANNE

, Circuit Judge

ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER

, Circuit Judge

No. 1 7

- 1883

PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF INDIANA AND KENTUCKY, INC., Plaintiff

- Appell ee ,

v

.

COMMISSIONER OF THE INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, in his official capacity, et al., Defendant s

- Appell ants

. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Sou thern District of
I ndiana

, Indianapolis Division

.

No. 1:16

- cv

- 01807

- TWP

- DML

Tanya Walton Pratt Judge

.

O R D E R

On July 2, 2020, the United States Supreme Court granted defendants’ petition for a writ of certiorari, and vacated the decision of this Court and remanded the case to this Court for further consideration in light of June Medical Services, L.L.C. v. Russo

, 140 S. Ct. 2103 (2020). Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, Inc., No. 18

- 1019 , 2020 WL
3578669 (July 2, 2020). In light of the parties’ joint Rule 54 statement requesting that we return this case to the district court, we remand to effectua te the parties’ agreement.
It is so ordered. NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1
# C_2017249EN.01001301.xml

| 31.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 249/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 249/13

---

Order of the Court (First Chamber) of 11 May 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Cluj — Romania) — SC Exmitiani SRL v Direcţia Generală a Finanţelor Publice Cluj

(Case C-286/16) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Activity of passenger road transport services - Tax - Facts prior to the accession of Romania to the European Union - Manifest lack of jurisdiction of the Court))

(2017/C 249/18)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Curtea de Apel Cluj

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: SC Exmitiani SRL

Defendant: Direcţia Generală a Finanţelor Publice Cluj

Re:

The Court of Justice of the European Union manifestly lacks jurisdiction to answer the questions referred by the Curtea de Apel Cluj (Court of Appeal, Cluj, Romania).

---

(1)  
  OJ C 296, 16.8.2016.

---
No. 68662.

protest 59/34242 (Los Angeles).

#### Nordlight, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of pulleys similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Word Light, Inc.*v. *United States*(49 CCPA 12, C.A.D. 786), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# C_2015371EN.01003901.xml

| 9.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 371/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 371/39

---

Action brought on 15 September 2015 — CBM v OHIM — ÏD Group (Fashion ID)

(Case T-535/15)

(2015/C 371/40)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: CBM Creative Brands Marken GmbH (Zürich, Switzerland) (represented by: U. Lüken, J. Bärenfänger, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: ÏD Group (Roubaix, France)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Applicant of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘Fashion ID’ — Application for registration No 10 638 658

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before OHIM

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 14 July 2015 in Case R 2470/2014-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision as far as it upheld the decision of the Opposition Division to reject the CTM No 10 638 658 with regard to the opposed goods and services in Classes 9, 14, 18, 25 and 35; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision as far as it upheld the decision of the Opposition Division to reject the CTM No 10 638 658 with regard to the opposed goods and services in Classes 9, 14, 18, 25 and 35;

| — | annul the corresponding decision of the Opposition Division of OHIM of 28 July 2014 (Case B 2 038 399) as far as the Opposition Division upheld the opposition to reject the CTM No 10 638 658; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the corresponding decision of the Opposition Division of OHIM of 28 July 2014 (Case B 2 038 399) as far as the Opposition Division upheld the opposition to reject the CTM No 10 638 658;

| — | dismiss the Opposition dated 26 June 2012 against the CTM No 10 638 658 in its entirety; |
| --- | --- |

—

dismiss the Opposition dated 26 June 2012 against the CTM No 10 638 658 in its entirety;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Plea(s) in law

Plea(s) in law

| — | The Opposition Division and the Board of Appeal failed to regard the long-standing case law of the General Court and of the Court of Justice according to which the overall impression of signs has to be compared, focusing on the contested CTM as a whole, instead of a comparison of single elements. |
| --- | --- |

—

The Opposition Division and the Board of Appeal failed to regard the long-standing case law of the General Court and of the Court of Justice according to which the overall impression of signs has to be compared, focusing on the contested CTM as a whole, instead of a comparison of single elements.

---
No. 65380.

#### Baker, Irons & Dockstader, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 60/9823 (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that had the complete file been before the collector during his 90-day period for review, the collector would have allowed free entry of the merchandise, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CRIMINAL NO. 03-487

:

v. :

:

ANDRE KEYES :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 29th day of October, 2015, upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion for 

Modification or Reduction of Sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (Docket No. 702), and 

the Government’s response thereto, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ John R. Padova, J.

 

John R. Padova, J.

Case 2:03-cr-00487-JP Document 720 Filed 10/29/15 Page 1 of 1
No. 49956.

#### Protest 972024-G of W. X. Huber Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decisions cited, which were incorporated herein, the merchandise in question was held dutiable as follows: (1) Certain items the same in all material characteristics respectively as the articles having the corresponding exhibit designations and passed upon in *Oy Wo Tong*v. *United States*(5 Cust. Ct. 70, G. D. 372) were held to be free of duty under paragraph 1669 as crude drugs, or dutiable at 10 percent under paragraph 34 as drugs, advanced; (2) ve-tsin similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Quong Yuen Shing Co.*v. *United States*(31 C. C. P. A. 43, C. A. D. 247), found to contain salt, was excluded from paragraph 5 and held dutiable at 20 percent under paragraph 1558 as a nonenumerated manufactured article; and (3) the duck meat packed in oil similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Wa Chong*v. *United States*(T. D. 45695) was held dutiable upon the basis of the weight of the duck, exclusive of the oil, agreed to weigh 55 pounds. The protest was sustained to this extent.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

: CIVIL ACTION NOS.

:

ROCHELLE : 02-3867

MONTGOMERY : 02-3889

HINES : 02-3901

KARI, et al. : 02-3926

HABERMAN : 02-3936

MILEY : 02-3951

FRANCO, et al. : 02-3975

DAVIS : 02-4113

RUSSELL, et al. : 02-4116

HERNANDEZ, et al. : 02-4126

QUILLEN, et al. : 02-4167

SIMMONS, et al. : 02-4174

BIEDERMAN : 02-4194

DRY, et al. : 02-4225

COOK : 02-4237

STEFAN, et al. : 02-4277

WALKER, et al. : 02-4283

DUNCAN, et al. : 02-4301

:

VS. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION, et al. :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of July, 2002, the Court having been previously

advised that the above action cannot proceed to trial and disposition because of the following

reason:

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending disposition of a related

action.

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending determination of

arbitration proceedings.

[ ] - Interlocutory appeal filed.

Case 2:02-cv-04277-SD Document 2 Filed 07/10/2002 Page 1 of 2
[ X ] - Other: Case is placed into suspense pending receipt of the Case

Transfer Order from the Judicial Panel on Multi District Litigation

transferring case to District of Minnesota.

It is

ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this action closed for statistical purposes and

place the matter in the Civil Suspense File, and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction; and that the case be

restored to the trial docket when the action is in a status so that it may proceed to final

disposition; this order shall not prejudice the rights of the parties to this litigation.

BY THE COURT:

________________________________________

Stewart Dalzell, S.J.

Case 2:02-cv-04277-SD Document 2 Filed 07/10/2002 Page 2 of 2
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1192 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for pro-rated charges 

to entitlement to educational assistance under Department of Veterans 

Affairs Post-9/11 Educational Assistance Program for certain licensure 

and certification tests and national tests, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 22, 2017 

Mr. ROUNDS (for himself and Ms. HIRONO) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to provide for prorated charges to entitlement to educational assistance 

under Department of Veterans Affairs Post-9/11 Educational Assistance Program for certain licensure and 

certification tests and national tests, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans To Enhance 

5 Studies Through Accessibility Act of 2017’’ or the ‘‘Vet6 erans TEST Accessibility Act’’. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1192 IS

1 SEC. 2. CHARGE TO ENTITLEMENT FOR CERTAIN LICEN2 SURE AND CERTIFICATION TESTS AND NA3 TIONAL TESTS UNDER DEPARTMENT OF VET4 ERANS AFFAIRS POST-9/11 EDUCATIONAL AS5 SISTANCE PROGRAM. 

6 (a) LICENSURE AND CERTIFICATION TESTS.—Sub7 section (c) of section 3315 of title 38, United States Code, 

8 is amended by striking ‘‘shall be determined’’ and all that 

9 follows through the end of such subsection and inserting 

10 ‘‘shall be pro-rated based on the actual amount of the fee 

11 charged for the test.’’. 

12 (b) NATIONAL TESTS.—Section 3315A of such title 

13 is amended— 

14 (1) in subsection (a), by adding at the end the 

15 following new paragraph: 

16 ‘‘(3) A national test that evaluates prior learn17 ing and knowledge and provides an opportunity for 

18 course credit at an institution of higher learning as 

19 so described.’’; and 

20 (2) in subsection (c), by striking ‘‘shall be de21 termined’’ and all that follows through the end of 

22 such subsection and inserting ‘‘shall be pro-rated 

23 based on the actual amount of the fee charged for 

24 the test.’’. 

25 (c) TESTS INCLUDED.—Section 3452(b) of such title 

26 is amended in the last sentence— 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1192 IS

1 (1) by striking ‘‘and national tests providing’’ 

2 and inserting ‘‘, national tests providing’’; and 

3 (2) by inserting before the period at the end the 

4 following: ‘‘, and national tests that evaluate prior 

5 learning and knowledge and provides an opportunity 

6 for course credit at an institution of higher learn7 ing’’. 

8 (d) EFFECTIVE DATE.—The amendments made by 

9 this Act shall apply to a test taken after the date that 

10 is 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
# C_2017053EN.01002102.xml

| 20.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 53/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 53/21

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht (Germany) lodged on 10 November 2016 — Volker Willmeroth, as owner of TWI Technische Wartung und Instandsetzung Volker Willmeroth e. K. v Martina Broßonn

(Case C-570/16)

(2017/C 053/28)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundesarbeitsgericht

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Volker Willmeroth, as owner of TWI Technische Wartung und Instandsetzung Volker Willmeroth e. K.

Applicant:

Defendant: Martina Broßonn

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Do Article 7 of Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time (1) or Article 31(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union grant the heir of a worker who died while in an employment relationship a right to financial compensation for the worker’s minimum annual leave prior to his death, which is precluded by Paragraph 7(4) of the Bundesurlaubsgesetz (Federal Law on paid leave), read in conjunction with Paragraph 1922(1) of the Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch (Civil Code)? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Do Article 7 of Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time (1) or Article 31(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union grant the heir of a worker who died while in an employment relationship a right to financial compensation for the worker’s minimum annual leave prior to his death, which is precluded by Paragraph 7(4) of the Bundesurlaubsgesetz (Federal Law on paid leave), read in conjunction with Paragraph 1922(1) of the Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch (Civil Code)?

1

| 2. | If the first question is answered in the affirmative:
  Does this also apply where the employment relationship is between two private persons? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If the first question is answered in the affirmative:

Does this also apply where the employment relationship is between two private persons?

---

(1)  OJ 2003 L 299, p. 9.

1

---
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 108

Note 14. Benefits Due and Payable

Benefits Due and Payable as of September 30, 2017, and 2016

(In billions of dollars) 2017 2016

Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance.................................................. 71.3 69.1

Grants to States for Medicaid.................................................................... 34.1 35.4

Federal Supplementary Medical Insurance (Medicare Parts B and D).......... 30.6 36.2

Federal Hospital Insurance (Medicare Part A) ............................................ 30.0 27.8

Federal Disability Insurance...................................................................... 26.9 28.1

All other benefits programs ....................................................................... 25.9 21.6

Total benefits due and payable............................................................... 218.8 218.2

Benefits due and payable are amounts owed to program recipients or medical service providers as of September 30 that

have not been paid. HHS and the SSA administer the majority of the medical service programs. For a description of the

programs, see Note 22—Social Insurance and the Unaudited Required Supplementary Information—Social Insurance

section.
Document

EXHIBIT 4 (b) (xxiv)














31 October 2019


Private & Confidential
Ms Catherine Woods




























Dear Catherine,


Non-executive Director appointment – Lloyds Banking Group plc


Further to my letter of 22 October, I can now confirm that your appointment on the terms set out in that letter will commence on 1st March, 2020. I look forward very much to having you with us.


Best regards
/s/ Norman Blackwell
----

|   | 1. | The      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended  and |
|--------|----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Registrant as of and for the periods presented in the    Report. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | /s/    | Lynda J. Nahra                             |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------|
|   |   | Lynda      J. Nahra                        |
|   |   | President      and Chief Executive Officer |
|   |   |                                       |
|   |   |                                       |
|   | /s/    | Charles G. Baltuskonis                     |
|   |   | Charles      G. Baltuskonis                |
|   |   | Executive      Vice President and          |
|   |   | Chief      FinancialOfficer                |

----
S. 117 

One Hundred Fifteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE SECOND SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and eighteen 

An Act 

To designate a mountain peak in the State of Montana as ‘‘Alex Diekmann Peak’’. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Alex Diekmann Peak Designation 

Act of 2017’’. 

SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF ALEX DIEKMANN PEAK, MONTANA. 

(a) IN GENERAL.—The unnamed 9,765-foot peak located 2.2 

miles west-northwest of Finger Mountain on the western boundary 

of the Lee Metcalf Wilderness, Montana (UTM coordinates Zone 

12, 457966 E., 4982589 N.), shall be known and designated as 

‘‘Alex Diekmann Peak’’. 

(b) REFERENCES.—Any reference in a law, map, regulation, 

document, record, or other paper of the United States to the peak 

described in subsection (a) shall be considered to be a reference 

to ‘‘Alex Diekmann Peak’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
**Exhibit
      32.2**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


(18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350)





In
      connection with this annual filing of DNAPrint Genomics, Inc., a Utah
      corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31,
      2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I,
      Monica Tamborini, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


*By:
                /s/ Monica Tamborini*
              Monica
                Tamborini
              Chief
                Financial Officer
              
              Date:
                March 28,
                2006