alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ James J. GiancolaName:
    James J. GiancolaTitle:
    President and
Chief Executive OfficerDate:
    August 7, 2008/s/ JoAnn Sannasardo LilekName:
    JoAnn Sannasardo LilekTitle:
    Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial OfficerDate:
    August 7, 2008
No. 49925.

#### Protests 886185-G, etc., of Henry Pollak, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record established that certain items of the merchandise consist of hats in chief value of ramie, similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 47291, which record was admitted in evidence herein. In accordance therewith the claim at 25 percent was sustained as to these items.
No. 68652.

protests 330783-K, etc. (New York).

#### A. Brickman, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of rotary lawn sprinklers or metal parts thereof similar in all material respects to those the subject of *The Durst Mfg. Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(50 CCPA 56, C.A.D. 820), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# C_2018083EN.01000801.xml

| 5.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 83/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 83/8

---

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 11 January 2018 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio — Italy) — Amber Capital Italia Sgr SpA (C-654/16), Amber Capital Uk Llp (C-654/16), Bluebell Partners Limited (C-657/16), Elliot International LP (C-658/16), The Liverpool Limited Partnership (C-658/16), Elliot Associates LP (C-658/16) v Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa (Consob)

(Joined Cases C-654/16, C-657/16 and C-658/16) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Company law - Directive 2004/25/EC - Takeover bids - Second subparagraph of Article 5(4) - Possibility of altering the price of the bid in specific circumstances and in line with clearly determined criteria - National legislation providing for the fixing of the price of the bid at the price ascertained in the event of collusion between the offeror or persons acting in concert with it and one or more sellers - Concept of ‘clearly determined criterion’))

(2018/C 083/10)

Language of the cases: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Amber Capital Italia Sgr SpA (C-654/16), Amber Capital Uk Llp (C-654/16), Bluebell Partners Limited (C-657/16), Elliot International LP (C-658/16), The Liverpool Limited Partnership (C-658/16), Elliot Associates LP (C-658/16)

Applicants:

Defendant: Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa (Consob)

Defendant:

Interveners: Hitachi Rail Italy Investments Srl, Hitachi Rail Italy SpA, Ansaldo Sts SpA (C-654/16), Finmeccanica SpA

Interveners:

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The second subparagraph of Article 5(4) of Directive 2004/25/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on takeover bids must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which allows the national supervisory authority to adjust upwards the price of a takeover bid in the event of collusion between the offeror or persons acting in concert with it and one or more sellers, by merely providing that, with regard to the price to which that takeover bid may thus be increased, that price is to correspond to the price ascertained by that authority, on condition that that price can be deduced in a sufficiently clear, precise and foreseeable manner from the body of national legislation, using methods of interpretation recognised by domestic law.

---

(1)  OJ C 121, 18.4.2017.

1

---
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.1


               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


         I, Scott D. Dorfman, Chief Executive Officer of Innotrac Corporation
(the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss 1350 as adopted by ss 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of the Company for the quarterly
         period ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the
         requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
         of 1934; and

(2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
         of the Company.


Dated: November 19, 2002

                                         /s/ Scott D. Dorfman
                                         ----------------------------
                                         Scott D. Dorfman
                                         President, Chief Executive Officer
                                         Chairman of the Board
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02-20-00149-CR

JAMES CALVIN MASSEY, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

§

§

§

§

§

On Appeal from the 371st District 

Court

of Tarrant County (1632168D)

December 9, 2021

Opinion by Justice Birdwell

(p)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there 

was error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial 

court is reversed, and this case is remanded to the trial court for further proceedings 

consistent with this opinion.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Wade Birdwell

 Justice Wade Birdwell
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES - OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the annual report of World Trophy Outfitters, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2008, Mathew Evans hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of his knowledge:  1. The annual report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.  June 20, 2008 /s/ Mathew Evans (Date) Mathew Evans (Principal Executive and Financial Officer)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       4,655,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 23,471,000
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                              0
<ALLOWANCE>                                  2,122,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             327,966,000
<DEPOSITS>                                 180,831,000
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,632,000
<LONG-TERM>                                117,280,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        40,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  28,077,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             327,996,000
<INTEREST-LOAN>                              6,961,000
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              651,000
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                             7,612,000
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           2,304,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,636,000
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        3,976,000
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  627,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              1,288,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,593,000
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   2,593,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,686,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                     0.43
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.43
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    5.09
<LOANS-NON>                                  2,130,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,523,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                   28,000
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            2,122,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                      2,122,000


</TABLE>
# C_2016145EN.01001402.xml

| 25.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 145/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 145/14

---

Appeal brought on 11 January 2016 by the Kingdom of Belgium against the order of the General Court (Second Chamber) of 27 October 2015 in Case T-721/14 Kingdom of Belgium v European Commission

Kingdom of Belgium

European Commission

(Case C-16/16 P)

(2016/C 145/18)

Language of the case: Dutch

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Kingdom of Belgium (represented by: L. Van den Broeck, M. Jacobs and J. Van Holm, acting as Agents, and P. Vlaemminck and B. Van Vooren, advocaten)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Other party to the proceedings:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:

| — | set aside the order of the General Court in Case T-721/14 in its entirety; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the order of the General Court in Case T-721/14 in its entirety;

| — | declare the action for annulment to be admissible; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare the action for annulment to be admissible;

| — | rule on the merits; |
| --- | --- |

—

rule on the merits;

| — | declare the applications to intervene lodged by the Hellenic Republic and the Portuguese Republic to be admissible; and |
| --- | --- |

—

declare the applications to intervene lodged by the Hellenic Republic and the Portuguese Republic to be admissible; and

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Grounds of appeal and main arguments

Grounds of appeal and main arguments

First ground of appeal: infringement of the principles of allocation of powers, loyalty and institutional balance, and misapplication of the conditions set out in Article 263 TFEU.

Second ground of appeal: infringement of the reciprocity of the principle of loyalty and undermining of the position of the Member State as a privileged applicant with a view to safeguarding its prerogatives.

Third ground of appeal: incorrect interpretation of the legal consequences of the recommendation with respect to Belgium.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MICHELE RICCI : CIVIL ACTION

v. :

:

AETNA, INC. d/b/a AETNA U.S. HEALTHCARE : NO. 02-4330

AND AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 25th day of February, 2003, after conducting a telephone status conference

with counsel, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Discovery is extended forty-five (45) days, or until April 17, 2003; 

2. A Telephone Status Conference will take place on April 18, 2003, at 10:00 a.m. to

determine whether discovery has been completed, to set a time frame for expert discovery and/or

dispositive motions, as well as explore the possibility of a resolution of the matter. Plaintiff’s

counsel shall initiate this conference call to (215) 597-6079.

3. The Telephone Status Conference previously scheduled for March 4, 2003, is cancelled.

BY THE COURT:

 

M. FAITH ANGELL

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:02-cv-04330-TJS Document 21 Filed 02/26/2003 Page 1 of 1
October 29, 1954

No. 58466.

Suit 4778.

#### United States *v.*Paul A. Straub & Co., Inc.

A. R. D. 20 reversed February 3, 1954. C. A. D. 553.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>     5
<CIK>         0001051488
<NAME>        FIRST DELTAVISION, INC.
       
<S>                                        <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                       0
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            22825
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           235
<OTHER-SE>                                      (23060)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                         0
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  2333
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (2333)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                  0
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (2333)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.01)
        

</TABLE>
No. 60758.

#### Surface Freight Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 286196-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

VICTOR BLAIR and PAULINE BLAIR :

: CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-CV-4223

Plaintiffs, :

:

v. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION;

BAYER AG;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE;

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM

:

:

:

:

:

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

:

Defendants. :

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of the Court:

Kindly enter the appearances of Hope S. Freiwald, Aline Fairweather, Erin

Brennan and Kirstin J. Miller as attorneys for defendant GlaxoSmithKline PLC.

Respectfully Submitted,

_____________________________ _____________________________

Hope S. Freiwald Aline Fairweather

_____________________________ _____________________________

Erin Brennan Kirstin J. Miller

DECHERT PRICE & RHOADS

4000 Bell Atlantic Tower

1717 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2793

(215) 994-4000

Case 2:02-cv-04223-RB Document 6 Filed 09/11/2002 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:04-cv-02841-SD Document 1 Filed 06/28/04 Page 1 of 20
Case 2:04-cv-02841-SD Document 1 Filed 06/28/04 Page 2 of 20
Case 2:04-cv-02841-SD Document 1 Filed 06/28/04 Page 3 of 20
Case 2:04-cv-02841-SD Document 1 Filed 06/28/04 Page 4 of 20
Case 2:04-cv-02841-SD Document 1 Filed 06/28/04 Page 5 of 20
Case 2:04-cv-02841-SD Document 1 Filed 06/28/04 Page 6 of 20
Case 2:04-cv-02841-SD Document 1 Filed 06/28/04 Page 7 of 20
Case 2:04-cv-02841-SD Document 1 Filed 06/28/04 Page 8 of 20
Case 2:04-cv-02841-SD Document 1 Filed 06/28/04 Page 9 of 20
Case 2:04-cv-02841-SD Document 1 Filed 06/28/04 Page 10 of 20
Case 2:04-cv-02841-SD Document 1 Filed 06/28/04 Page 11 of 20
Case 2:04-cv-02841-SD Document 1 Filed 06/28/04 Page 12 of 20
Case 2:04-cv-02841-SD Document 1 Filed 06/28/04 Page 13 of 20
Case 2:04-cv-02841-SD Document 1 Filed 06/28/04 Page 14 of 20
Case 2:04-cv-02841-SD Document 1 Filed 06/28/04 Page 15 of 20
Case 2:04-cv-02841-SD Document 1 Filed 06/28/04 Page 16 of 20
Case 2:04-cv-02841-SD Document 1 Filed 06/28/04 Page 17 of 20
Case 2:04-cv-02841-SD Document 1 Filed 06/28/04 Page 18 of 20
Case 2:04-cv-02841-SD Document 1 Filed 06/28/04 Page 19 of 20
Case 2:04-cv-02841-SD Document 1 Filed 06/28/04 Page 20 of 20
# C_2017129EN.01001303.xml

| 24.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/13

---

Order of the President of the Court of 18 January 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Finanzgericht Münster — Germany) — X v Finanzamt I

(Case C-238/16) (1)

1

(2017/C 129/19)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 343, 19.9.2016.

1

---
# C_2017309EN.01001401.xml

| 18.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 309/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.9.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 309/14

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 26 July 2017 — Staatliche Porzellan-Manufaktur Meissen GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), Meissen Keramik GmbH

(Case C-471/16 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for registration of the figurative mark including the word element ‘meissen’ - Rejection of the opposition - Evidence presented for the first time - Distortion - Genuine use of the earlier trade marks - Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 7(3) - Article 8(5) - Link between the trade marks to be compared))

(2017/C 309/18)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Staatliche Porzellan-Manufaktur Meissen GmbH (represented by: O. Spuhler and M. Geitz, Rechtsanwälte)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: M. Fischer, acting as Agent), Meissen Keramik GmbH (represented by: M. Vohwinkel and K. Gennen, Rechtsanwälte)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Staatliche Porzellan-Manufaktur Meissen GmbH to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Staatliche Porzellan-Manufaktur Meissen GmbH to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 454, 5.12. 2016.

1

---
U.S. authorization from Decision XX/5 3,233,456 12.7% 3,233,456 12.7% Changes between proposed and final

U.S. authorization from Decision XXI/11 NA NA 2,018 0.0% additional authorization for SE strawberry nurseries

(1) Total US Authorization 3,233,456 12.7% 3,235,474 12.7%

(2) - Maximum allowable new production/import 2,763,456 10.8% 2,765,474 10.8%

(3) = Minimum allowable CSA 470,000 1.8% 470,000 1.8%

U.S. authorization (1) 3,233,456 12.7% 3,235,474 12.7%

(4) - Reduction for uptake of alternatives 0.0% 0.0%

(6) = One year's CUE need 3,233,456 12.7% 3,235,474 12.7%

x Percentage of year's production to recover 62.940% 62.936%

(6) = SCF to meet that need 2,035,000 2,036,000 additional authorization has slight effect on SCF value

(7) Existing pre-phaseout inv on 1/1/09 ("ES") 4,271,226 4,271,226

(8) - Estimated/actual drawdown of ES during 2009 ("D") 2,834,226 1,207,118

(9) - SCF (6) 2,035,000 2,036,000

(10) = Available stocks ("AS") -598,000 1,028,108 4.0%

(11) Reported as produced/imported in 2008 3,036,130 3,036,130

(12) - Reported as sold in 2008 2,768,853 2,784,539

(13) = Unsold carryover 267,277 251,591 1.0% carryover was not correctly applied in proposal

U.S. authorization (1) 3,233,456 12.7% 3,235,474 12.7%

- Minimum Allowable CSA (3) 470,000 1.8% 1,028,108 4.0%

- Carryover (13) 267,277 1.0% 251,591 1.0%

- Research 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

- Uptake of alternatives 0 0.0% 0 0.0%

= Gross new production (14) 2,496,179 9.8% 1,955,775 7.7%

(14) Gross new production 2,496,179

- New Production in 2009 2,275,715

(15) = Increase in CUA 220,464 0.9% 0.0%

Minimum Allowable CSA (3) 470,000 1.8% 1.8%

+ Increase in CUA (15) 220,464 0.9% 0.0%

(16) = Critical Stock Allowance (CSA) 690,464 2.7% 0 1.8%

Gross New Production (14) 2,496,179 9.8% 7.7%

- No increase in CUA (15) 220,464 0.9% 0.0%

(17) = Net New Production (CUA) 2,275,715 8.9% 0 0.0%

CUA (17) 2,275,715 8.9% 1,955,775 7.7%

 + CSA (16) 690,464 2.7% 1,028,108 4.0%

= Total 2,966,179 11.6% 2,983,883 11.7%

received actual end of year data which allowed use of 

existing framework for calculating available stocks

Calculate "available stocks"

Proposed Rule

Calculate New Production (=CUA)

Calculate total amount allocated

Calculate carryover

Calculate gross new production

Calculate increase in year to year new production

Calculate CSA

Final Rule New

2010 authorizations from the Parties

Calculate supply chain factor

2010 CUE Calculations (proposed and final)
|                       |        |                                         |
|----------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------|
|                       |   |                                         |   |
| Dated:      March 30, 2010 | By:    | /s/      Dwaine Reese                        |   |
|                       |   | Chief      Executive Officer and Chairman of |   |
|                       |   | the      Board (Principal Executive Officer) |   |
|                       |   |                                         |   |
|                       |   |                                         |   |
| Dated:      March 30, 2010 | By:    | /s/      Richard Dicks                       |   |
|                       |   | Richard      Dicks, Chief Financial Officer  |   |
|                       |   | (Principal      Financial Officer)           |   |
|                       |   |                                         |   |
|                       |   |                                         |   |

----
# C_2017095EN.01000303.xml

| 27.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 95/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/3

---

Appeal brought on 4 August 2016 by Staywell Hospitality Group Pty Ltd against the judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) delivered on 2 June 2016 in Cases T-510/14 and T-536/14: STAYWELL HOSPITALITY GROUP AND SHERATON INTERNATIONAL IP v EUIPO — SHERATON INTERNATIONAL IP AND STAYWELL HOSPITALITY GROUP (PARK REGIS)

(Case C-440/16 P)

(2017/C 095/07)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Staywell Hospitality Group Pty Ltd (represented by: D. Farnsworth, solicitor)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), Sheraton International IP LLC

Other parties to the proceedings:

By order of 12 January 2017 the Court of Justice (Ninth Chamber) held that the appeal was inadmissible.

---