alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                             5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Duke Capital Corporation Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 1998 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                   0001051116
<NAME>                                  DUKE CAPITAL CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000
       
<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                     6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                           DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                            47900
<SECURITIES>                                          0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   1293600
<ALLOWANCES>                                          0
<INVENTORY>                                      223700
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                3567400
<PP&E>                                         10052000
<DEPRECIATION>                                  3784800
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 12448500
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           3495400
<BONDS>                                         2708700
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                 0
<PREFERRED>                                           0
<COMMON>                                              0
<OTHER-SE>                                      3615800
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   12448500
<SALES>                                         4815300
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                5987500
<CGS>                                           4608300
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   5295900
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 225600
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                      0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               112800
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  521900
<INCOME-TAX>                                     135000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              254600
<DISCONTINUED>                                        0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   (8000)
<CHANGES>                                             0
<NET-INCOME>                                     246600
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                         0 <F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         0 <F1>
        
<FN>
<F1>Not meaningful since Duke Capital Corporation is a wholly-owned subsidiary.
</FN>

</TABLE>
# C_2017006EN.01002302.xml

| 9.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 6/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 6/23

---

Appeal brought on 2 June 2016 by Ukraine against the order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber, Extended Composition) delivered on 11 March 2015 in Case T-346/14: Yanukovych v Council

(Case C-317/16 P)

(2017/C 006/29)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Ukraine (represented by: M. Kostytska, avocat)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Viktor Fedorovych Yanukovych, Council of the European Union, European Commission, Republic of Poland

Other parties to the proceedings:

By order of 5 October 2016 the Court of Justice (Eighth Chamber) held that the appeal was inadmissible.

---
# 2017_06 Pivot Table 5B

# 5

&"Calibri,Bold"&11 2017_06 MTS Table 5 Line Analysis	

&P/&N
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         I, Scott D. Dorfman, Chief Executive Officer of Innotrac Corporation
(the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended
         September 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements
         of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.

Dated: November 7, 2003

                          /s/ Scott D. Dorfman
                          --------------------
                          Scott D. Dorfman
                          President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the
                          Board
+ IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

June 23, 2003

Lancaster County

Office of the Clerk of Courts

Courthouse

50 North Duke Street

P.O. Box 83480

Lancaster, PA 17608-3480

Re: John Perez Leon v. L.P. Benning, et al.

Civil Action No. 02-4267

Case No. 3277-1997 

To the Clerk:

The above captioned case has now been disposed of, and we are returning the

State Court Record which was ordered to this Court by the Honorable M. Faith Angell.

 Very truly yours,

Sharon A. Hall

Deputy Clerk to the Hon. James McGirr Kelly

Enclosures

cc: Clerk of Court for filing

Statistics

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Please sign and return this letter as a receipt for the return of the State Court Record

SIGNATURE: 

DATE: 

Case 2:02-cv-04267-JK Document 8 Filed 06/23/2003 Page 1 of 1
CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT  TO
                             18  U.S.C.  SECTION  1350,
                             AS  ADOPTED  PURSUANT  TO
                  SECTION  906  OF  THE  SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT  OF  2002


In  connection  with  the Annual Report of New Medium Enterprises, Inc.  on Form
10-K  for  the  period  ending  June 30, 2002 as filed with the  Securities  and
Exchange  Commission  on  the  date  hereof (the  "Report"),  I, Ethel Schwartz,
President  &  Chief  Executive  Officer of New Medium Enterprises, Inc. certify,
pursuant  to  18  U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements of the Securities Act
of  1933,  as  amended;  and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of New
Medium  Enterprises,  Inc.




/s/  Ethel  Schwartz
-----------------------
Ethel  Schwartz
Chief  Executive  Officer
September  18,  2002


                                       19
<PAGE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

MBC DEVELOPMENT, LP, MBC 

MANAGEMENT, LLC, MBC PROPERTIES, 

LP, JAMES L. MILLER, MILLER 

PROPERTIES MANAGEMENT, LLC, 

MARTIN CERULLO, WILLIAM KIRWAN

v.

JAMES W. MILLER

PETITION OF: MBC DEVELOPMENT, LP, 

MBC MANAGEMENT, LLC, MBC 

PROPERTIES, LP, JAMES L. MILLER, AND 

MILLER PROPERTIES MANAGEMENT, 

LLC

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 387 MAL 2022

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 4th day of January, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

GRANTED. The issue, rephrased for clarity is:

Whether a limited partner can force arbitration of his challenges to a special 

litigation committee—despite the Limited Partnership Act’s mandate that a 

partnership agreement “may not . . . vary” the Act’s requirement that those 

challenges be subjected only to a “court review”?
No. 61272.

protest 265641-K/7190 (Chicago).

#### International Expediters, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the articles described on the consular invoice as “Needle Files” measure over 2)4 inches, but not over 4)4 inches in length, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Before the Second Division,

December 11, 1961

No. 66268.

#### Seymour Smith & Son, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 60/11191 (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of grape shears similar in all material respects to those the subject of *John H. Graham & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(41 Cust. Ct. 67, C.D. 2022), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**CertificationPursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofAXT, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Philip C. S. Yin, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 906”), that,to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1) The Reportfully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: August 9, 2005 | By:    | /s/ Philip C. S. Yin    |
|-----------------------|--------|-------------------------|
|                  |   | Philip C. S. Yin        |
|                  |   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
zw aa IPAC Operational Metrics for September 2020

Volume by Transaction Type

Dollar Amount| ‘% of Total Dollar Amount] Number of Transactions] _% of Total Number of Transactions|
Fiduciary (Investment & Borrowing) 16,948 847,355,194] 99.73%| 16,982] 11.08%
Buy/Sell 38,914,409,822| 0.23%| 134,980] 88.11%
Benefits (RITS) 6,384,678,726| 0.08%4| 41] 0.27%
[Check Aftermath (TRACS) 162,493,417| 0.00%4| 828] 0.54%|
[Zero Dollar o| 0.00%4| | 0.00%|
[Grand Total - September 2020 16,994,308,937,159| 100.00%4| 153,201] '100-00%4|
[Grand Total - August 2020 16,978,935,366,231| 100.00%4|
[August to September Change 15,373,570,928|
Percentage Change 0.1%|
[Grand Total - September 2019 15,100,750,011,356|
[Sept 2019 to Sept 2020 Change 1,893,558,925,803|

Percentage Change 25%

“The file that failed to process correctly related to a Connect:Direct submission that became stuck in the Connect: Direct inbox for the agency. The file was
Jater submitted successfully.
Before the Second Division,

April 22, 1968

No. P68/213.

protests 64/14984, etc. (New York).

#### Daher Company, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Beckworth, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of containers *1036of tinplate, not plated with platinum, gold, or sliver, and not containing electrical heating elements, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Fabius &*Co., Inc., and *Daher Company, Inc.*v. *United States*(55 Cust. Ct. 305, C.D. 2595), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
# C_2016251EN.01000702.xml

| 11.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 251/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 251/7

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione Tributaria Provinciale di Torino (Italy) lodged on 15 April 2016 — Bimotor SpA v Agenzia delle Entrate — Direzione Provinciale II di Torino

(Case C-211/16)

(2016/C 251/10)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Commissione Tributaria Provinciale di Torino

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Bimotor SpA

Appellant:

Respondent: Agenzia delle Entrate — Direzione Provinciale II di Torino

Respondent:

Question referred

Question referred

Does the Community legislation on VAT (Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC (1) of 17 May 1977, as amended by Directive 2002/38/EC (2) and Directive 2006/112/EC (3)) preclude legislation of a Member State — such as Article 34(1) of Law No 388 of 23 December 2000 — under which VAT claims may be repaid or used to offset tax owed, for a given tax year, not in their entirety but only up to a predetermined maximum limit?

1

2

3

---

(1)  Sixth Council Directive 77/388/EEC of 17 May 1977 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Common system of value added tax: uniform basis of assessment (OJ 1977 L 145, p. 1).

1

(2)  Council Directive 2002/38/EC of 7 May 2002 amending and amending temporarily Directive 77/388/EEC as regards the value added tax arrangements applicable to radio and television broadcasting services and certain electronically supplied services (OJ 2002 L 128, p. 41).

2

(3)  Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1).

3

---
Case 2:04-cv-05317-MAM   Document 5   Filed 02/03/05   Page 1 of 23

Case 2:04-cv-05317-MAM   Document 5   Filed 02/03/05   Page 2 of 23

Case 2:04-cv-05317-MAM   Document 5   Filed 02/03/05   Page 3 of 23

Case 2:04-cv-05317-MAM   Document 5   Filed 02/03/05   Page 4 of 23

Case 2:04-cv-05317-MAM   Document 5   Filed 02/03/05   Page 5 of 23

Case 2:04-cv-05317-MAM   Document 5   Filed 02/03/05   Page 6 of 23

Case 2:04-cv-05317-MAM   Document 5   Filed 02/03/05   Page 7 of 23

Case 2:04-cv-05317-MAM   Document 5   Filed 02/03/05   Page 8 of 23

Case 2:04-cv-05317-MAM   Document 5   Filed 02/03/05   Page 9 of 23

Case 2:04-cv-05317-MAM   Document 5   Filed 02/03/05   Page 10 of 23

Case 2:04-cv-05317-MAM   Document 5   Filed 02/03/05   Page 11 of 23

Case 2:04-cv-05317-MAM   Document 5   Filed 02/03/05   Page 12 of 23

Case 2:04-cv-05317-MAM   Document 5   Filed 02/03/05   Page 13 of 23

Case 2:04-cv-05317-MAM   Document 5   Filed 02/03/05   Page 14 of 23

Case 2:04-cv-05317-MAM   Document 5   Filed 02/03/05   Page 15 of 23

Case 2:04-cv-05317-MAM   Document 5   Filed 02/03/05   Page 16 of 23

Case 2:04-cv-05317-MAM   Document 5   Filed 02/03/05   Page 17 of 23

Case 2:04-cv-05317-MAM   Document 5   Filed 02/03/05   Page 18 of 23

Case 2:04-cv-05317-MAM   Document 5   Filed 02/03/05   Page 19 of 23

Case 2:04-cv-05317-MAM   Document 5   Filed 02/03/05   Page 20 of 23

Case 2:04-cv-05317-MAM   Document 5   Filed 02/03/05   Page 21 of 23

Case 2:04-cv-05317-MAM   Document 5   Filed 02/03/05   Page 22 of 23

Case 2:04-cv-05317-MAM   Document 5   Filed 02/03/05   Page 23 of 23
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AXT, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Donald L. Tatzin,
Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Section 906), that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

November 13, 2003

| |                        
| | -----------------------
| | /s/  Donald L. Tatzin  
| |                        
| | Donald L. Tatzin       
| | Chief Financial Officer

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature
that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written
statement required by Section 906, has been provided to AXT,Inc. and will be
retained by AXT, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission
or its staff upon request.
# C_2015262EN.01003301.xml

| 10.8.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.8.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/33

---

Action brought on 31 May 2015 — Smarter Travel Media/OHIM (SMARTER TRAVEL)

(Case T-290/15)

(2015/C 262/44)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Smarter Travel Media LLC (Boston, United States of America) (represented by: P. Olson, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word elements ‘SMARTER TRAVEL’ — Application for registration No 12 460 044

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 20/03/2015 in Case R 1986/2014-2

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | The Board of Appeal erred in finding that the mark was not distinctive; |
| --- | --- |

—

The Board of Appeal erred in finding that the mark was not distinctive;

| — | The Board of Appeal erred in misapplying the Bild decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

The Board of Appeal erred in misapplying the Bild decision;

Bild

| — | The Board of Appeal erred in not taking into account that the trademark contained an independently registrable element; |
| --- | --- |

—

The Board of Appeal erred in not taking into account that the trademark contained an independently registrable element;

| — | The Board of Appeal erred in not taking into account that the same trademark with a different logo had been registered for essentially the same services and that the new application is merely a modernization; |
| --- | --- |

—

The Board of Appeal erred in not taking into account that the same trademark with a different logo had been registered for essentially the same services and that the new application is merely a modernization;

| — | The Board of Appeal erred in not making a global assessment. |
| --- | --- |

—

The Board of Appeal erred in not making a global assessment.

---
AiisivA ,7&*s 727// Ok) RECEIVED VMMeUM/T OCT 26 2015 BIOF.M. 2.231 ,,,„,- .„,••• -JfhfCmrlr&se-Jl)o. //£>2%& 4k ' //0&25 ?^ 

### Z2Ase\A. two uyiTappiiccttton d$ Uabte&rpas a A //^^icW/^/'^a 4e '/M&AlAriA&>uA Ar Mams Co.) Houston TeX&S.JMress b(Wndms Danielt JtAriAciaA) jAed. lW' \%MZ} by ceAAeAmAl b file . AhrsumA k AA. lib*? s<?Adn 2>(b)i>£4ke. &Ae ACrmmAPrcc'eAare.Also 

### cl leUer aJoist^ Clerk<£4k> Sad h&dfdA UN sec A\d}AAU C.Cj.

U/iiU JiAnAliane d.vu$ respone.or notice. Aan^ /feJ orprofessloMiAnd Gomikcfi CGixHestyjxe^mAbo^ we, wick^aUo AUl a. \dr\i A.MaviJums 

### 4c sW OffuA"W Clerk to file on /k&^t\&B}Z receiJeJ by A/r-Ar$xr^y^ 

### CeAAieJ mad^S 1090 6601 (tfVl Wl) wlticfc Z receive j backc*Aft. Rl, ' £0\$. Clerk- has fc/W to ddmplij Am Ae y&ds &>SeAAnAnalPAc<?Jare; 

### K Ati.lWj &edion 3£e), eorrecTme AjCw wto«g XA notkneu) ndkik^ o$kou) Ake /<£io is Gftplu! or &A(gn &RtxU&rfleit to help me vme 4his Asrvjard.. . Aho Ufa wrote ne. A(Oy H, 30fe [eturwrn back \^AopplicAldy\ because

_ 

### AAseS not Comply ujf'ft AAcle. fl.O% secfo/7 37f)*



### . £A^&*r3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JUST BORN, INC., :

Plaintiff, : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. :

:

LOCAL UNION 6, BAKERY : 

CONFECTIONARY TOBACCO :

WORKERS & GRAIN MILLERS : No. 02-2626

INTERNATIONAL UNION OF :

AMERICA, :

Defendant. :

SCHEDULING ORDER

AND NOW, this day of September, 2002 following a Rule 16 conference on

September 20, 2002 with counsel for the parties, and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil

Procedure 16 and Local Rule of Civil Procedure 16.1(b), it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Cross motions for summary judgment shall be filed by November 8, 2002. 

2. Responses to motions for summary judgment shall be filed by November 22,

2002.

BY THE COURT:

 

Berle M. Schiller, J.

Case 2:02-cv-02626-BMS Document 6 Filed 09/20/2002 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 13.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.


SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Alto Palermo Sociedad Anónima (APSA) (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Matias Gaivironsky, as Chief Financial Officer of the company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;
 
 
 (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Alto Palermo S.A. (APSA)October 30, 2014.
By:
/s/ Matias GaivironskyMatias GaivironskyChief Financial Officer





This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except as to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
No. 55165.

#### Grace Line, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 164102-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

An examination of the papers disclosing that certain mandatory regulations of the Secretary of the Treasury were not complied with, the protest was overruled.
March 2 4 , 2015

Mr. Scott Dennison

Manager of Risk and Crowd Services

SFX Entertainment

13622 East Westland Road

Scottsdale, AZ 85262

Dear Mr. Dennison :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption. It

explains why we cannot process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can n o t Process Your Request

We entered your February 17 , 2015 exemption request on behalf of SFX Entertainment into

the public docket (No. FAA

- 20 15

- 0404 ) , but we are unable to process your request any

further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy

enclosed). For us to cons ider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

• The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief and th e extent of

the relief you seek

.

• Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your re quest.

W hat You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described

earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your

petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do No t Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you

further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202 ) 267

- 9521

.

Sincerely,

/s/

Jake Troutman

Program Analyst , Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to Section 906

of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with this Annual Report for Fiscal 2016 Ended August 31, 2016 of Golden Goliath Resources Ltd., a company organized under the British Columbia Corporations Act(the Company) on Form 20-F as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, J. Paul Sorbara, President and Director of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/  J. Paul Sorbara

J. Paul Sorbara, President/Director





Date: January 18, 2017