alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017112EN.01001301.xml

| 10.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/13

---

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 12 January 2017 — Amrita Soc. coop. Arl and Others v European Commission

(Case C-280/16 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Protection of plant health - Directive 2000/29/EC - Protection against the introduction into and spread within the European Union of organisms harmful to plants or plant products - Implementing Decision (EU) 2015/789 - Measures to prevent the introduction into and the spread within the Union of Xylella fastidiosa (Wells and Raju) - Action for annulment - Fourth paragraph of Article 263 TFEU - Regulatory act - Implementing measures - Person individually concerned))

(2017/C 112/18)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Appellants: Amrita Soc. coop. arl, Cesi Marta, Comune Agricola Lunella Soc. mutua coop. arl, Rollo Olga, Borrello Claudia, Società agricola Merico Maria Rosa di Consiglia, Marta e Vito Lisi, Marzo Luigi, Stasi Anna Maria, Azienda Agricola Crie di Miggiano Gianluigi, Castriota Maria Grazia, Azienda Agricola di Canioni Fiorella, Azienda Agricola Spirdo ss agr., Impresa Agricola Stefania Stamerra, Azienda Agricola Clemente Pezzuto di Pezzuto Francesco, Simone Cosimo Antonio, Masseria Alti Pareti Soc. agr. arl (represented by: L. Paccione and V. Stamerra, avvocati)

Appellants:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: F. Moro and I. Galindo Martín, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Amrita Soc. coop. arl, Dei Agre di Cesi Marta, Comune agricola Lunella Soc. mutua coop. arl, Azienda agricola Rollo Olga, Azienda agricola Borrello Claudia, Società agricola Merico Maria Rosa SNC, Azienda agricola di Marzo Luigi, Azienda agricola Stasi Anna Maria, Azienda agricola Crie di Miggiano Gianluigi, Azienda agricola di Castriota Maria Grazia, Azienda agricola di Cagnoni Fiorella, Azienda agricola Spirdo ss agr., Impresa Agricola Stamerra Stefania, Azienda agricola Clemente Pezzuto di Pezzuto Francesco, Azienda agricola di Simone Cosimo Antonio and Masseria Alti Pareti Soc. agr. Arl are ordered to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Amrita Soc. coop. arl, Dei Agre di Cesi Marta, Comune agricola Lunella Soc. mutua coop. arl, Azienda agricola Rollo Olga, Azienda agricola Borrello Claudia, Società agricola Merico Maria Rosa SNC, Azienda agricola di Marzo Luigi, Azienda agricola Stasi Anna Maria, Azienda agricola Crie di Miggiano Gianluigi, Azienda agricola di Castriota Maria Grazia, Azienda agricola di Cagnoni Fiorella, Azienda agricola Spirdo ss agr., Impresa Agricola Stamerra Stefania, Azienda agricola Clemente Pezzuto di Pezzuto Francesco, Azienda agricola di Simone Cosimo Antonio and Masseria Alti Pareti Soc. agr. Arl are ordered to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 260, 18.7.2016.

1

---
<PAGE>


                                                                  Exhibit 32(ii)

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Dialog Group,
Inc. (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Vincent DeCrescenzo, Sr., the Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, that:

      (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: March 31, 2004
                                             /s/  Vincent DeCrescenzo
                                           ----------------------------
                                           Vincent DeCrescenzo, Sr. CFO
# C_2015414EN.01003701.xml

| 14.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 414/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 414/37

---

Action brought on 19 October 2015 — Batmore Capital v. OHIM — Univers Poche (POCKETBOOK)

(Case T-596/15)

(2015/C 414/48)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Batmore Capital Ltd (Tortola, British Virgin Islands) (represented by: D. Masson, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Univers Poche (Paris, France)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Applicant of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the figurative mark containing the word element ‘POCKETBOOK’ — Application for registration No 1 034 872

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before OHIM:

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 30 July 2015 in Case R 1952/2014-1

Contested decision:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | consider the present appeal admissible; |
| --- | --- |

—

consider the present appeal admissible;

| — | annul the contested decision in its entirety; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision in its entirety;

| — | register the Community part of the International trademark registration No 1 034 872; |
| --- | --- |

—

register the Community part of the International trademark registration No 1 034 872;

| — | order OHIM to pay the fees and costs incurred by the applicant in the course of the present proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the fees and costs incurred by the applicant in the course of the present proceedings.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Wrong appreciation of the similarity of the products and services; |
| --- | --- |

—

Wrong appreciation of the similarity of the products and services;

| — | Wrong appreciation of the likelihood of confusion between the signs in conflict. |
| --- | --- |

—

Wrong appreciation of the likelihood of confusion between the signs in conflict.

---
AD Economic Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2014-0757 Directorate ID: 2014-SW-030-AD

Helicopter Model: Airbus Helicopters, Inc., Model EC130B4 Helicopters

Number of Helicopters (U.S. Operators): 160 Helicopters in the US Registry.

Reason: The actions of this AD are intended to detect a crack in the tailboom/Fenestron junction 

frame, which could result in detachment of the Fenestron and subsequent loss of control of the 

helicopter.

Costs:

Parts per Helicopter $60,000 for tailboom replacement

Labor per Helicopter

(1 work-hour x $85/workhour for the inspection)

(50 work-hour x $85/workhour for the replacement)

$85 per inspection cycle

$4,250

Other (Explain)

Total Cost per Helicopter $85 per inspection cycle

$64,250 for tailboom replacement

Total US Fleet Cost $13,600 per inspection cycle

Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action?” Yes ( ) No ()

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? Yes ( ) Explain Below No ()

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities?

Yes ( ) No ()

Project Engineer: Robert Grant
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MARGARET ANCTIL :

: CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-CV-4285

Plaintiff, :

:

v. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION;

BAYER AG;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE;

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM

:

:

:

:

:

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

:

Defendants. :

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of the Court:

Kindly enter the appearances of Hope S. Freiwald, Aline Fairweather, Erin

Brennan and Kirstin J. Miller as attorneys for defendant GlaxoSmithKline PLC.

Respectfully Submitted,

_____________________________ _____________________________

Hope S. Freiwald Aline Fairweather

_____________________________ _____________________________

Erin Brennan Kirstin J. Miller

DECHERT PRICE & RHOADS

4000 Bell Atlantic Tower

1717 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2793

(215) 994-4000

Case 2:02-cv-04285-LDD Document 6 Filed 09/11/2002 Page 1 of 1
No. 60391.

protest 230144-K (New York).

#### Nixon Nitration Works *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

The protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
Attachment A

 :

02-2635 SHIRK :

02-2735 WATSON :

02-2736 HOOD :

02-2737 HART :

02-2738 JOHNSON :

02-2681 SHIRK :

02-2845 KINIUK :

02-3166 HRYCYK :

02-3168 GREEN :

02-3169 SAKEWICZ :

02-3170 HENDRICKS :

02-3171 PALMER :

02-3172 BERRY :

02-3175 SOLOMON :

02-3176 ROMANOWSKI :

02-3177 O’DONNELL :

02-3448 HARTMANN :

02-3449 ROCKS :

02-3450 REED :

02-3451 GAMBLER :

02-3452 MACAULEY :

02-3630 ALIBERT :

02-3631 VISCO :

02-3632 DANCSECS :

02-3847 HAMMOND :

02-3848 POTTER :

02-4095 SMITH :

02-4096 SEARFOSS :

02-4097 GEARINGER :

02-4101 FRYE :

02-4338 ZIMMERMAN :

02-4339 MEYER :

Case 2:02-cv-04097-CRW Document 6-2 Filed 10/09/2002 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:02-cv-04097-CRW Document 6-2 Filed 10/09/2002 Page 2 of 2
Before the Second Division,

November 17, 1955

No. 59449.

protests 249866-K, etc. (New York).

#### Ascot, Ltd., et al. *v.*United States,

*306Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of traveling irons similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Greatrex, Limited,*and *J. J. Gavin & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 79, C. D. 1639), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS4679 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

TALMADGE W. TAYLOR, JR., : CIVIL ACTION

:

Plaintiff, :

:

v. :

:

NORTH AMERICAN AVIATION :

SERVICES, :

: No. 02-2748

:

Defendant. :

:

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of July, 2002, upon consideration

of Plaintiff’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Document 2), it

is hereby ordered Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED, without

prejudice. Plaintiff may file another motion provided it is

supplemented with a detailed explanation of his efforts to employ

counsel and his inability to pay attorney’s fees.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

______________________________

Clarence C. Newcomer, S.J. 

Case 2:02-cv-02748-CN Document 3 Filed 07/23/2002 Page 1 of 1
No. 63540.

protest 58/23297 (Los Angeles).

#### 20th Century Fox Film Corporation *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5(b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
Exhibit 99.1

                               THE GSI GROUP, INC.
                             1004 E. Illinois Street
                           Assumption, Illinois  62510



November  7,  2003

Securities  and  Exchange  Commission
450  Fifth  Street,  N.W.
Washington,  D.C.  20549

Re:     Certification  pursuant  to  18  U.S.C.  Sec.  1350,
     as  enacted  by  Section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002
     ---------------------------------------------------------------------

Ladies  and  Gentlemen:
     In  connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September  26,  2003  of  The  GSI  Group,  Inc.,  a  Delaware  corporation (the
"Company"), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), the undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350,
as  enacted  by  section  906  of  the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act  of  2002,  that:
1.     The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  and
2.     The  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the Company.


     /s/  Craig  Sloan
Craig  Sloan
Chief  Executive  Officer



     /s/  Russell  C.  Mello
Russell  C.  Mello
Chief  Financial  Officer,
Secretary  and  Treasurer
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Bridget M. McCormack

, Chief Justice

David F. Viviano,

Chief Justice Pro Tem

Stephen J. Markman

Brian K. Zahra

Richard H. Bernstein

Elizabeth T. Clement

Megan K. Cavanagh,

Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 2, 2020

p1216 

# Order

Clerk January 2, 2020

160162

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 160162

COA: 347877

Oakland CC: 2017

- 262293

- FH

ALBERT LEWIS WALKER

, Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the J uly 3, 2019 order of

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because the defendant has failed to

meet the burden of establishing entitlement to relief under MCR 6.508(D).
(V. D. 28)

Entry No. 779337, etc.

#### Astra Trading Corp. *v.*United States

(Decided September 19, 1956)

*Barnes, Richardson & Colburn (Edward N. Glad*of counsel) for the plaintiif.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

WilsoN, Judge:

These matters are presently before me on a remand from a classification proceeding decided by the first division of this court in *Astra Trading Corp.*v. *United States,*34 Cust. Ct. 260, Abstract 58686. The judgment entered therein stated: “* * * that the matters be remanded to a single judge in reappraisement pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d).”

The matters have been submitted for decision upon an agreed statement of facts entered into by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto.

Upon the agreed facts, I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (d)), to be the proper basis for determining the values of the involved merchandise and that such values are as set forth in schedule *“A,”*hereto attached and made a part hereof, less the deductions from such itemized unit prices as invoiced, cases and packing as shown in said schedule “A.”

I further find such values to be the dutiable values of said merchandise.

The actions having been abandoned insofar as all other items of merchandise are concerned, to that extent they are dismissed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Exhibit
31.1




CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 302
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





I, Daniel
Vesco, certify that:





1. 
I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of Texhoma Energy,
Inc.;





2.
 Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;





3.
 Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;





4.
 I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
small business issuer and have:





a)
 Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;





b)
 Paragraph omitted in accordance with SEC transition instructions contained
in SEC Release No. 33-8238;





c)
 Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and





d)
 Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and





5.
 I have disclosed, based on, my most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):




a)  All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and





b)  Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over
financial reporting.





Date:
March 20, 2008





By:/s/
Daniel Vesco


Daniel
Vesco


Chief
Executive Officer and


Chief
Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer)
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 216 (Thursday, November 9, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 77326]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-24809]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; Notice 
of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The cooperative agreement applications and the 
discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial 
property such as patentable material, and personal information 
concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the 
disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of 
personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Neurological Disorders 
and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel; BPN Small Molecule and Biologic 
Therapeutic Drug Discovery for Disorders of the Nervous System.
    Date: November 28-29, 2023.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate cooperative agreement 
applications.
    Place: National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 
Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Eric S. Tucker, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural 
Activities, NINDS/NIH/DHHS, NSC, 6001 Executive Boulevard, 
Rockville, MD 20852, 301-827-0799, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4227302b216c363721292730022c2b2a6c252d34"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="a0c5d2c9c38ed4d5c3cbc5d2e0cec9c88ec7cfd6">[email protected]</span></a>.

    This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the 
meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and 
funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, 
Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, 
Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS.)

    Dated: November 6, 2023.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-24809 Filed 11-8-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2018005EN.01001202.xml

| 8.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 5/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 5/12

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 9 November 2017 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny — Poland) — AZ v Minister Finansów

(Case C-499/16) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Taxation - Value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Article 98 - Discretion of the Member States to apply a reduced rate to certain supplies of goods and services - Annexe III, point 1 - Foodstuffs - Pastry goods and cakes - Best-before date or use-by date - Principle of fiscal neutrality))

(2018/C 005/16)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Referring court

Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: AZ

Applicant:

Defendant: Minister Finansów

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 98 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as meaning that it does not preclude — provided that the principle of fiscal neutrality is complied with, which is for the referring court to ascertain — national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which makes the application of the reduced VAT rate to fresh pastry goods and cakes depend solely on the criterion of their ‘best-before date’ or their ‘use-by date’.

---

(1)  OJ C 22, 23.1.2017.

1

---
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION**     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Midwest Banc Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon November 9, 2006 (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.            /s/ James J. Giancola         Name: James J. Giancola    Title: President and      Chief Executive Officer    Date: November 9, 2006              /s/ Daniel R. Kadolph         Name: Daniel R. Kadolph    Title: Executive Vice President and      Chief Financial Officer    Date: November 9, 2006