alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                      42,305,387
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         739,244
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             2,387,304
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                177,365,837
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       3,857,744
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         3,784,428
<LOANS>                                    568,582,034
<ALLOWANCE>                                (5,041,205)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             835,708,990
<DEPOSITS>                                 675,425,079
<SHORT-TERM>                                71,000,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          4,243,260
<LONG-TERM>                                 29,307,591
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    53,615,245
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,177,815
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             835,708,990
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             24,858,406
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            4,683,951
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               467,791
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            30,010,148
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                          10,126,942
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,760,934
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       18,122,272
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                1,350,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                               6,251
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                             16,190,410
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              3,806,435
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   3,806,435
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 2,392,839
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.22
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.22
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    8.00
<LOANS-NON>                                  5,134,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                   255,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                             4,352,386
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             4,296,414
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  634,243
<RECOVERIES>                                    29,034
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            5,041,205
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         5,041,205
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
No. 61755.

#### Manca, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 315446-K (New York).

*503Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of lenses for photo enlargers; that said enlargers were held dutiable at 15 percent under paragraph 1551, as modified, as photographic cameras in *Manca, Inc.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 271, C. D. 1874); and that, in accordance with said decision, the merchandise in question is dutiable as photographic lenses, the claim of the plaintiff at 25 percent was sustained.
No. 61690.

#### Trans World Shipping Corp. *v.*United States,

protests 311599-K and 311613-K (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

The protests were dismissed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CRIMINAL ACTION

v. :

COREY KEMP : NO. 04-370-02

ORDER 

AND NOW, this 11th day of December, 2009, for the reasons stated in the foregoing

Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant Corey Kemp’s Petition under 28 U.S.C. §

2255 (Doc. No. 880) to vacate his sentence is DENIED. There is no reason to issue a certificate

of appealability.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Michael M. Baylson

 

Michael M. Baylson, U.S.D.J.

O:\Criminal Cases\04-370-2 Kemp post conviction\Kemp - Order post-conviction petition.wpd
**Exhibit23.1****Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 forthe Company’s Citizens First Savings Bank 401 (K) Plan (Registration No. 333-74218), Citizens FirstBancorp, Inc. 2001 Stock-Based Incentive Plan (Registration No. 333-98199) and Citizens FirstBancorp, Inc. Management Restricted Stock Purchase Plan (Registration Nos. 333-100516 and333-122417) and in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 for the Citizens First Bancorp, Inc.Dividend Reinvestment and Optional Cash Purchase Plan (Registration No. 333-115896) of our reportsdated March 15, 2007 relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness ofCitizens First Bancorp, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting, which appear in this Form10-K.
20 Leading Occupations of Employed Women 

Full-time Wage and Salary Workers 

2005 Annual Averages 

(employment in thousands) 

 Total Women’s 

 Total Employed Median 

 Employed (Men and Percent Weekly 

Occupation Women Women) Women Earnings

Total, 16 years and older 

(all employed women, full-time 

wage and salary workers) 65,757 141,730 46.4 $585 

Secretaries and admin. assistants 3,404 3,499 97.3 559 

Cashiers 2,334 3,075 75.9 322 

Registered Nurses 2,229 2,416 92.3 930 

Elementary and middle school teachers 2,151 2,616 82.2 813 

Retail salespersons 1,687 3,248 51.9 401 

Nursing, psychiatric, and 

 home health aides 1,686 1900 88.7 385 

First-line supervisors/managers 

 of retail sales workers 1,462 3,523 41.5 525 

Bookkeeping, accounting, and 

 auditing clerks 1,329 1,456 91.3 551 

Waiters and waitresses 1,383 1,927 71.8 332 

Receptionists and information clerks 1,271 1,376 92.4 463 

Childcare workers 1,260 1,329 94.8 330 

Customer service representatives 1,258 1,833 68.6 505 

Maids and housekeeping cleaners 1,237 1,382 89.5 328 

First-line supervisors/managers of 

 office and administrative support 1,115 1,598 69.8 656 

Accountants and auditors 1,042 1,683 61.9 784 

Teacher assistants 861 947 90.9 398 

Office clerks, general 816 965 84.6 509 

Cooks 778 1,838 42.3 314 

Preschool and kindergarten teachers 702 719 97.6 520 

Janitors and building cleaners 681 2,074 32.8 363 

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Annual Averages 2005.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JOAN POPE BROWN, : CIVIL ACTION

Plaintiff :

:

:

v. :

:

JO ANNE E. BARNHART, :

COMMISSIONER OF THE :

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION :

Defendant : NO. 04-1584

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 2nd day of August, 2005, after careful review of the Report and

Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Timothy R. Rice, and having been advised

by the Clerk of Court that, after notice to the parties, no objections to the Report and

Recommendation have been filed, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.

2. The Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED.

3. The Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED.

4. This matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further proceedings

consistent with the Report and Recommendation.

BY THE COURT:

____________________________________

GENE E. K. PRATTER

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cv-01584-GEKP Document 14 Filed 08/02/05 Page 1 of 1
August 27, 1951

No. 55843.

protests 120086-K, etc.

#### Geo. S. Bush & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Plaintiff's application for rehearing denied.
No. 49079.

#### Protest 98371-K of Olavarria & Co., Inc. (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that there was a shortage of the 77 bags in question and that the collector’s office made no adjustment because the 90-day period in which he may review his action had expired before completion of the investigation by customs officials. The protest was therefore sustained.
### E NEY 

### GENE-L OFTEXAS

GERALD C. MANN Acxwrxiu 11.TEXAS

ATTORNEYC3ENERAX.

Honorable J. 0. Loftln, President Texas College of Arts and Industries Kingsville,Texas Dear Mr. Lof'cin: OpinionNo. O-2992 Re: Whether or not a person simultaneouslymay serve on the Board of Directors of the Texas College ofArts and Industries and at the same time serve as the County Superintendent of Public Instruction of a county in Texas with a population of 13,305. We acknowlege receipt of your letter of December 21, 1940,propounding for a legal opinion the followingquestion:

"Maya person simultaneouslyserve on the Board of ,Directorsof the Texas College of Arts and Industriesand at the same time serve as the County Superintendent of Public Instructionof a county In Texas with a population of 13,305?" Your inquiry shouldbe answered In the affirmative. Section 33 of ArticleXVI of the Constitution vides: "Theaccounting officers of this State shall neither draw nor pay a warrant upon the treasury in favor of any person, for salary or compensation as agent, officer or appointee,who holds at the same time any other office or position of honor, trust or profit,under this State or the United States, exceptas prescribed in this Constitution. Provided, that this restrictionas to the drawlng and paying ofwarrants upon the treasury shall not apply to officers of the National Guard of Texas, the National Guard Reserve, the Officers Reserve Corps of the United States, nor to enlisted men of the National Guard, the National Guard Reserve States.b and the OrganizedReserves of the United pro-Honorable J. 0. Loftin, page 2 O-2991

Assuming, as we do, that the office of County Superintendent of Public Instructionhas been lawfully created in the county to which you refer, it necessarily follows that the lncumbent of such office holds an office or position of honor, trust, or profit,under this State,within the meaning of the above-quoted constitutionalprovision.

The same thing may be said of the office or position of a member of the Board ofDirectors of the Texas College ofArts and Industries,so that this office likewise fallswithin the scope of the provisionquoted.

Our answer above given Is subject to this qualification: The Board member would not be entltled to receive compensation from the State for his servicesas suchmember.

The matter is controlledby our OpinionNo. O-1422, to which you refer in your letter,wherein we held that a member of theBoard of Directors of the Texas College ofArts and Industries could at the same time serve as a member of the Board of Trustees of an independentschooldistrict, but indoing so he would forfeit all right to any compensation to which he might have been entitledas a member of the Board of Directors. Very truly yours ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS By s/OcieSpeer Ocie Speer Assistant OS--MR--WC APPROVED s/GeraldJAN 6, 1941

C. Mann ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS Approved Opinion CommitteeBy s/BWB Chairman
# C_2015414EN.01003601.xml

| 14.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 414/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 414/36

---

Action brought on 14 October 2015 — The Art Company B & S v OHIM — G-Star Raw (THE ART OF RAW)

(Case T-593/15)

(2015/C 414/47)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: The Art Company B & S, SA (Quel, Spain) (represented by: J. Villamor Muguerza and L. Sánchez Calderón, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: G-Star Raw CV (Amsterdam, Netherlands)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Applicant: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant:

Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘THE ART OF RAW’ — Application for registration No 11 093 036

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before OHIM:

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 9 July 2015 in Case R 1980//2014-1

Contested decision:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order OHIM as well as the CTMA Applicant (in case it intervenes) to pay the costs of the present Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM as well as the CTMA Applicant (in case it intervenes) to pay the costs of the present Appeal.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
Pre‐Approved FY2024 GTAS Manual Adjustments

In FY2023, the GTAS Team continued to be more selective regarding which manual adjustments were

approved and, as a result, the number of manual adjustments made has decreased significantly from

FY2016 to FY2023.  We will be evaluating the need for manual adjustments again in FY2024 as our

goal is to continue to minimize the number of adjustments that need to be made.

In March 2024, we sent out a data call to significant entities to gain an understanding as to what

types of manual adjustments an entity already anticipated making at year end.  We asked entities to

provide the reasons for any potential adjustments and why these corrections couldn’t be made via

the bulk file.  Throughout the months following, we’ll been evaluating the responses we receive and

have pre‐approved the following as valid reasons for manual adjustments in FY2024*:

  To adjust the split between “Net Position – funds from dedicated collections” and “Net

Position – funds other than those from dedicated collections”

  To adjust for a TAS that has both fiduciary and non‐fiduciary activity

Please keep in mind that responses to our data call do not affect whether or not any unanticipated or

additional adjustments will be approved at year end.  This information is only needed for us to get a

general idea of what types of manual adjustments we can expect for FY2024.  Any unanticipated manual

adjustments that arise will be evaluated on a case‐by‐case basis and should be sent to the GTAS Team at

GTAS.Team@fiscal.treasury.gov for approval.

* These pre‐approvals have been given governmentwide and do not reflect the entity specific manual

adjustments that will be approved and communicated to each entity.  If you are unsure if a manual

adjustment has been pre‐approved for a reason previously provided by your entity, please reach out to

your GTAS point of contact (https://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/gtas/contact‐list‐for‐agencies.html).
Exhibit
23.6







CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM





To the
Board of Directors


Xfone,
Inc.





Gentlemen:





We
consent to the inclusion of our Report of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm dated March 26, 2009 with respect to the balance sheets of Xfone
018 Ltd. as of December 31, 2008 and 2007 and the related statements of
operations, shareholders' equity (deficiency) and cash flows for the years then
ended.   We understand that our Report of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm dated March 26, 2009 was used in connection with the
audit of the consolidated financial statements of Xfone, Inc. and its
subsidiaries for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, and will be filed in
connection with the annual report on form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2008 of Xfone, Inc.








/s/ Yarel +
Partners


Yarel +
Partners


C.P.A
(Isr.)


Tel Aviv,
Israel


March 31,
2009
Document

Exhibit 10.33
FIRST AMENDMENT
TO THE AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT LIFE HOLDING COMPANY
AMENDED AND RESTATED SHORT-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
The following amendment (the “First Amendment”) to the American Equity Investment Life Holding Company (the “Company”) Amended and Restated Short-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”) was adopted by the Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board of Directors of the Company on February 25, 2021. Capitalized terms used and not otherwise defined herein shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Plan.
1.Amendment to Section III (M).  Section III, “Definitions”, part M of the Plan is amended and replaced in its entirety to read as follows:
M.        “For Cause” includes: (i) the willful and continued failure by an Employee Participant to perform substantially the Employee Participant’s duties with the Company (other than any such failure resulting from the Employee Participant’s incapacity due to physical or mental illness) for a period of thirty (30) days after a written demand for substantial performance is delivered to the Employee Participant that specifically identifies the manner in which the Employee Participant has not substantially performed his or her duties; (ii) the commission of an act of fraud, embezzlement or dishonesty in the course of employment that results in material loss, damage or injury to the Company or any Affiliate; (iii) material non-compliance with generally accepted financial standards or reporting requirements  that results in the Company’s restatement of its earnings, financial results or financial statements; (iv) the conviction of, guilty plea to, or plea of “no contest” to a criminal act, whether or not in the course of employment or in the workplace, that constitutes a felony or other serious crime involving moral turpitude, dishonesty or fraud; (v) the  violation of a non-compete, non-solicitation or confidentiality agreement with the Company, that causes material financial impact or significant reputational harm, or the material violation of any Company Code of Conduct; or (vi) the willful failure to cooperate with the Company or any Affiliate in any investigation or formal proceeding or being found liable in a Securities and Exchange Commission enforcement action.  Any act, or failure to act, based upon authority given pursuant to a resolution duly adopted by the Board or based upon the advice of counsel for the Company shall be conclusively presumed to be done, or omitted to be done, by the Employee Participant in good faith and in the best interests of the Company.
2.Effect on the Plan.  Except as specifically amended by this First Amendment, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.
3.Governing Law.  This First Amendment shall be governed by and construed according to the laws of the State of Iowa.
[signature page follows] 










IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this First Amendment to be executed as of the date first above written.
						
	AMERICAN EQUITY INVESTMENT

	LIFE HOLDING COMPANY

		
		
	By:	/s/ Jennifer Bryant
	Name: Jennifer Bryant

	Title: Chief Human Resources Officer
QT racaer:

IPAC Operational Metrics for January 2021

Volume by Transaction Type
Dollar Amount] % of Total Dollar Amount Number of Transactions] _ 9 of Total Number of Transactions|
Fiduciary (Investment & Borrowing) 16,243,488, 760,222] 99.73% 16343 15.3454
Buy/Sell 36 ,647,076,795| 0.23% 33,023] 33.54%]
Benefits (RITS) 6,568,217,703| 0.04%] 342] 032%
[Check Aftermath (TRACS) 210,577,807] 10.008 857
Zero Dollar | 0.00% 7
[Grand Total - January 2021 16,286,914 632,525] 100.005 106,572]
[Grand Total - December 2020 19,146 434,881,612| 100.0% 111.765]
[December to January Change -2,859,520,249,084]
[Percentage Change “14.95 |
=
[Grand Total - January 2020 16,766,750,798,943| [0672
[yan 2020 to Jan 2021 Change 473,836,166 414 ee)
Percentage Change 29% [0.28
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of ebank Financial Services, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Wayne W. Byers, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      1.    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

                                        /s/ Wayne W. Byers
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Wayne W. Byers
                                       Chief Financial Officer
                                       August 12, 2004
EX-10.2




 Exhibit 10.2 

Apache Corporation 401(k) Savings Plan 

Amendment to Definition of Change of Control 

Apache Corporation (“Apache”) sponsors the Apache Corporation 401(k) Savings Plan (the “Plan”). In section 10.4 of the Plan, Apache
reserved the right to amend the Plan from time to time. Apache hereby exercises that right as follows, effective March 1, 2021: 
  

	1.	 Subsection 5.1(c) is hereby deleted and superseded in its entirety by the following: 



 

	 	(c)	 Change of Control. The Company Contributions Accounts of all Participants shall be fully vested as of
the “Effective Date” of a “Change of Control,” as such terms are defined in APA Corporation’s Income Continuance Plan or any successor to such plan. 



[Signature Page Follows] 

  
 Page 1 of 1 












 EXECUTED this 1st day of March, 2021. 

 

			
	APACHE CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	/s/ Brandy Jones
		 	 Brandy Jones
 Vice President, Human
Resources




  
 Signature Page to Apache
Corporation 401(k) Savings Plan 
 Amendment to Definition of Change of Control
Conference Call with Tribal Environmental Professionals 

August 30, 2007 

Meeting Note to the Docket 

Discussion Topics 

On August 30, 2007, representatives from the US Environmental Protection Agency 

(EPA) participated in a meeting with a workgroup of interested tribal environmental 

professionals regarding the implementation of the rule titled: “Review of New Sources 

and Modifications in Indian Country.” The attendees discussed the following: 

 General permits 

 Tips for consultation 

 Primer on how to request delegation 

 Ideas for draft implementation plan
IPAC Operational Metrics for January 2020

‘Volume by Transaction Type
Dollar Amount} % of Total Dollar Amount| Number of Transactions| % of Total Number of Transactions |

Fiduciary (investment & Borrowing) 16,728,261,092,403) 99.77%] 16,454] 15.41%)

Buy/Sell 31,242,786,751 0.19%] 89,093} 83.47%

Benefits (RITS) 7,078,858,395| 0.0456) 425] 0.40%)

Check Aftermath (TRACS) 168,061,394} 0.0056} 769) 0.72%

Zero Dollar i) 0.0056} 4 0.00%)

|Grand Total - January 2020 16,766, 750,798,943) 100.00%| 106,742) 100.00%6|

|Grand Total - December 2019 16,362,413,809,954) 00.00%) 106,968) 100.00%6|

[December to January Change 404,336,988, 989| 2

Percentage Change 2.5%] po 0.286

[Grand Total - January 2019 16,652,467, 167,232| 85,356)

Jan 2019 to Jan 2020 ‘Change 114,283,631,711

0.796)