alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. SS. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the annual report of Dermisonics, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the "Report"), I, Bruce H. Haglund, the acting Chief Executive Officer
(or equivalent thereof) and acting Chief Financial Officer (or equivalent
thereof) of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of
my knowledge and belief:

     (1)     the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)     the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


                                   /s/ Bruce H. Haglund
                                    ----------------------------------
                                   Bruce H. Haglund
                                   Acting Chief Executive Officer
                                   Acting Chief Financial Officer
                                   February 16, 2007
#### Amos *vs.*Flournoy & Epping.

The evidence was conflicting and there was no abuse of discretion in refusing a new trial.

June 1, 1888

New trial. Before Judge Smith. Talbot superior court. September term, 1887.

Reported in the decision.

C. J. Thornton, for plaintiff in error.

S. B. Hatcher, by brief, *contra.*

Blandford, Justice.

Flournoy & Epping were proceeding to foreclose a mortgage on real estate belonging to Amos, which mortgage had been transferred to them by one Philip Heidenfelder. Amos appeared and pleaded to that proceeding that the mortgage had been paid off and discharged by him while the same was in the hands of Heidenfelder; and he testified that he had delivered to Heidenfelder two bales of cotton, with directions to apply the proceeds upon this mortgage, which amounted to some fifty dollars, the balance to' be applied to another mortgage of sixty dollars, held by Heidenfelder. He testified substantially to the plea which he had filed. Flournoy *&*Epping introduced *772a postal card written by Amos to. them, in which Amos alluded to the mortgage, the subject-matter of controversy, and stated that he would be in Columbus in a short *time;*that “Mr. Estes may not have the pay, but I have.” The jury found a verdict for the plaintiffs; and Amps moved for a new trial, upon the ground that the.verdict was contrary to evidence and to the law, and without evidence to support it. The court refused the motion for a new trial, and this is excepted to.

We do not think that the court abused his discretion in refusing to grant a new trial in this case, under the facts.

Judgment affirmed.
# C_2017086EN.01002201.xml

| 20.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 86/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 86/22

---

Order of the President of the First Chamber of the Court of 6 December 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa — Latvia) — proceedings brought by „Starptautiskā lidosta ‘Riga’ VAS, intervener: Konkurences padome

(Case C-159/16) (1)

1

(2017/C 086/27)

Language of the case: Latvian

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 191, 30.5.2016.

1

---
No. 57205.

protest 194813-K (New York).

#### Munson G. Shaw Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the facts and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, were not in fact received by the importer. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited it was held that duty and internal revenue tax are not assessable upon such portions of the merchandise as were reported by the inspector as manifested, not found. The protest was sustained to this extent.
July 21, 1950

No. 54559.

Suit 4625.

#### Charles T. Wilson Company, Inc. *v.*United States.

C. D. 1163 modified May 9, 1950. C. A. D. 433.
No. 63002.

#### Stanrich Mills Corporation *v.*United States,

protest 58/11250 (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

The protest was dismissed.
he

IPAC Operational Metrics for May 2022

‘Volume by Transaction Type

Dollar Amount! % of Total Dollar Amount! Number of Transactions|_% of Total Number of Transactions}
juciary (investment & Borrowing) 24,294,935,807,662| 99.79%! 22,643) 17.51%
Buy/Sell 42,604,292,647| 0.17% 105,362| 81.48%!
Benefits (RITS) 8,692,985,079 0.04% 518 0.40%
ICheck Aftermath (TRACS) 808,458,439] 0.00%| 791 | 0.61%
|Zero Dollar | 0.00%] 1 0.00%
|Grand Total - May 2022 24,347,041,543,826| 100.00%| 129,315, 100.00%|
[Grand Total - April 2022 24,605,860,642,772| 100.00%4| 129,867, 100.00%|

[April to May Change -258,819,098,946| ee)

[Percentage Change “1.4% 0

——

|Grand Total - May 2021 16,703,672,306,045| 122,177,

[May 2021 to May 2022 Change 7,643,369,237,781| ee)

[Percentage Change 45.8% p58]
| Subsidiary                             | Jurisdiction of Incorporation  |  Ownership Interest  |
|----------------------------------------|------------------------------------------|-------------------------------------|
| Arcos del GourmetS.A.                  | Argentina                                |   90.00%                  |
| FibesaS.A.                             | Argentina                                |   100.00%                 |
| EmprendimientoRecoleta S.A.            | Argentina                                |   53.68%                  |
| ShoppingNeuquén S.A.              | Argentina                                |   99.95%                  |
| Panamerican MallS.A.                   | Argentina                                |   80.00%                  |
| TorodurS.A.                            | Uruguay                                  |   100.00%                 |
| EntertainmentHoldings S.A.             | Argentina                                |   70.00%                  |
| Centro deEntretenimientos La Plata S.A |       Argentina |   100.00%                 |
No. 58462.

protests 184423-K, 184424-K, and 194733-K (New York).

#### Astoria Pan Americana, Inc., and J. J. Boll *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of ficin powder or *leche de oje en polvo*the same in all material respects as that the subject of *Astoria Pan-Americana, Inc.*v. *United States*(32 Oust. Ct. 243, C. D. 1608), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

v.

XANG SACKSITH

CRIMINAL ACTION

NO. 04-390-01

 

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 29th day of May, 2024, it is HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

1. Upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion for an Extension of Time to File a Response

(ECF No. 214), the Motion is GRANTED nunc pro tunc. 

2. Upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion for Compassionate Release pursuant to 18 

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A) (ECF No. 211), the Government’s opposition thereto (ECF No. 

212), and Defendant’s reply (ECF No. 215), the Motion is DENIED. 

3. Upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion for Reconsideration pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. 

P. 60(b) (ECF No. 210), the Motion is DENIED. 

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Wendy Beetlestone

_______________________________

WENDY BEETLESTONE, J.

Case 2:04-cr-00390-WB Document 221 Filed 05/29/24 Page 1 of 1
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

PUBLIC MEETING ON THE TEST PROCEDURE FOR

COMMERCIAL REFRIGERATION EQUIPMENT

U.S. Department of Energy

1000 Independence Avenue, SW.

Washington, DC 20585

Thursday, December 5, 2013

Room 8E

- 089



### Purpose

The Department of Energy (DOE) seeks comments, information, and data from interested parties on

the notice of proposed rulemaking addressing changes to the test procedure for commercial

refrigeration equipment (CRE).



### Agenda

9:00

– 9: 05 am Welcome, Introductions, Agenda Review, & Opening Statements

Doug Brookman

Interested parties make a brief summary of their comments.

9:05

– 9:1 5 am Rulemaking History & Timeline

Charles Llenza

Summary of the statutory background, regulatory process, and

schedule for this rulemaking.

9:1 5

– 10:30 am Test Procedure Scope & Definitions

Sarah Widder

Summary presentation and discussion regarding the scope of covered

commercial refrigeration equipment and new definitions to clarify the

application of standard and test procedures to covere d equipment.

10:30

– 10:45 am Break

10:45

– 11:30 a m Clarifications to the Test Procedure

Collin Weber

Summary presentation and discussion regarding the clarifications to

the DOE test procedure in response to inquiries from interested parties

and result ing from the negotiated rulemaking process (Docket No.

EERE

- 2013

- BT

- NOC

- 0023)

11:30

– 11:40 a m BreakU.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

PUBLIC MEETING ON THE TEST PROCEDURE FOR

COMMERCIAL REFRIGERATION EQUIPMENT

U.S. Department of Energy

1000 Independence Avenue, SW.

Washington, DC 20585

Thursday, December 5, 2013

Room 8E

- 089



### Agenda (cont.)

11:40

– 11:50 a m Other Test Procedure Issues

Sarah Widder

Summary presentation and discussion regarding the several other issues

regarding conduct of the DOE test procedure, including rounding of test

results, the lowest application product temperature provisions,

clarifications in response to Interpretations to AHRI 1200

- 2010,

determination of total display area, and the complia nce date of DOEs

curren t and amended test procedures.

11:50

– 12:15 pm Discussion of TDA Calculation Methodology

Ashley Armstrong

Summary presentation and discussion regarding the methodology for

calculating total display area (TDA) in the DOE TP.

12:15

– 1:30 pm Closing Remarks & Contacts & Information

Charles Llenza

Final discussions on issues and closing remarks.
Since you last filed Form W-4 

with your employer did you ...

u Marry or divorce?

u Gain or lose a dependent?

u Change your name?

Were there major changes to ...

u Your nonwage income (interest, dividends, capital gains, etc.)?

u Your family wage income (you or your spouse started or ended a job)?

u Your itemized deductions?

u Your tax credits?

If you can answer “YES”... To any of these questions or you owed

extra tax when you filed your last return, you may need to file a new Form W-4.

See your employer for a copy of Form W-4 or call the IRS at 1-800-829-3676.

Now is the time to check your withholding. For more details, get Publication 919,

How Do I Adjust My Tax Withholding?, or use the Withholding Calculator at

www.irs.gov/individuals on the IRS website.

Employer: Please post or publish this Bulletin Board

Poster so that your employees will see it. Please indicate

where they can get forms and information on this subject.

IRS Department of the Treasury

Internal Revenue Service

www.irs.gov

Publication 213 (Rev.8-2009)

Cat. No. 11047P

You May Need to Check Your 

 Withholding
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

: CIVIL ACTION NOS.

:

TODD : 02-3885

WINDING : 02-3894

HEDSTROM, et al. : 02-3908

GONZALEZ, et al. : 02-3915

GOMEZ, et al. : 02-3941

MATUSZAK, et al. : 02-3944

BICK : 02-4109

ROGERS : 02-4122

ALLEN : 02-4124

BREWER : 02-4132

SHAPIRO : 02-4198

FINCH, et al. : 02-4219

WHITESIDE, et al. : 02-4245

TKACH : 02-4248

RITTHALER, et al. : 02-4263

SCHULEIN, et al. : 02-4264

WONG, et al. : 02-4278

DENTS, et al. : 02-4303

DURAN, et al. : 02-4314

:

VS. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION, et al. :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of July, 2002, the Court having been previously

advised that the above action cannot proceed to trial and disposition because of the following

reason:

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending disposition of a related

action.

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending determination of

arbitration proceedings.

[ ] - Interlocutory appeal filed.

Case 2:02-cv-04264-WY Document 2 Filed 07/10/2002 Page 1 of 2
[ X ] - Other: Case is placed into suspense pending receipt of the Case

Transfer Order from the Judicial Panel on Multi District Litigation

transferring case to District of Minnesota..

It is

ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this action closed for statistical purposes and

place the matter in the Civil Suspense File, and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction; and that the case be

restored to the trial docket when the action is in a status so that it may proceed to final

disposition; this order shall not prejudice the rights of the parties to this litigation.

BY THE COURT:

________________________________________

William H. Yohn, Jr., Judge

Case 2:02-cv-04264-WY Document 2 Filed 07/10/2002 Page 2 of 2
**GAO-01-1101R**                      Published: Sep 21, 2001. Publicly Released: Oct 23, 2001.                  

-   
-   
-   
-   

    Jump To:  
-  Elder Abuse 
-  Services for Older Adults 
-  State and Local-Level Drivers and Trends 
-  State and Local Fiscal Projections 
-  Federal Borrowing 
-  Managing the Debt 
-  Summary of Funding Provisions 
-  Auditing the Government's Books 
-  Unpacking the Financial Report 
-  Highlights 
-  Recommendations 
-  Background 
-  About This Work 
-  About This Work 
-  Trends 
-  About the Center 
-  Why It's High Risk 
-  What Remains To Be Done 
-  Key Reports 
-  Newest COVID-Related Reports 
-  AI Use Cases 
-  Flood Insurance 
-  Past Pandemic-Related Reports 
-  CARES Act Oversight Reports 
-  All COVID-19 Reports 
-  Report Suspected Fraud 
-  Subjects 
-  How to Get Notified 
-  Past Reports 
-  Public Health Threats 
-  Explore the FY 2022 and 2023 Funds 
-  Status of FY22 Projects 
-  Lessons Learned 
-  Agency Reports 
-  Recent Reports 
-  Recommendations 
-  Supplemental Material 
-  Full Report 
-  Additional Data 
-  View Decision 
-  Downloads 
-  Previously Identified Actions 
-  Related Pages 
-  Associated Agencies 
-  Tough Choices and Opportunities Ahead 
-  Americas Fiscal Future Key Areas 
-  Retirement Security Key Areas 
-  Current List 
-  About The High Risk List 
-  Area Ratings 
-  Previous High Risk Products 
-  Search Federal Vacancies 
-  Past Federal Vacancies 
-  Violation Letters 
-  About the Yellow Book 
-  Advisory Council 
-  Related Resources 
-  Comment Letters 
-  Related Publications 
-  Contacts and Resources 
-  Major Issues Facing the Nation 
-  Meeting Strategic Challenges 
-  Additional Resources 
-  Resources 
-  GAO Contacts 
-  Mission Teams 
-  Operations and Staff Offices  
-  Organization Chart  
-  Why a Career at GAO? 
-  Am I Qualified? 
-  Company Culture 
-  Reasonable Accommodations 
-  Video Gallery 
-  Paid Internships 
-  Student Volunteers 
-  Professional Development Program 
-  Advancement 
-  Executive Candidate Program 
-  Summer Associates 
-  Externships 
-  Benefits 
-  Contacts 

Skip to Highlights

## Highlights

GAO reviewed the Forest Services total costs associated with its timber sales program for fiscal years 1998 and 1999. Serious accounting and financial reporting deficiencies at the Forest Service during fiscal years 1998 and 1999 precluded GAO from making an accurate determination of the total federal costs for the timber sales program. These deficiencies made the Forest Service's cost information totally unreliable.

## Full Report

Full Report (7 pages)

## Office of Public Affairs

### Media Inquiries

Sarah Kaczmarek
kaczmareks@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

### Public Inquiries

Public Affairs
PublicAffairs@gao.gov

(202) 512-4800

## Topics

Natural Resources and Environment

Accounting proceduresCost accounting standards complianceData integrityFinancial statement auditsReporting requirementsTimber salesFinancial managementFinancial reportingProgram managementFederal agencies
(Reap. Dec. 10313)

Entry No. 444, etc.

#### Minneapolis Honeywell Regulator Company *v.*United States

(Decided August 7, 1962)

*John J. Atkinson*for the planitiff.

*Joseph D. G-mlfoyle,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

OliveR, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement, enumerated in schedule “A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the attorneys for the parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court:

> That this stipulation is limited to the items marked “A” and initialed KT by Kelly Tipps on the invoices covered by the entries and appeals for reappraisement enumerated in Schedule “A” hereto attached and made a part hereof.

> That the merchandise is identified on the Pinal List published by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 (T.D. 54521) and accordingly was appraised under the provisions of Section 402a (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended by the said Customs Simplification Act.

> That on or about the date of exportation such or similar merchandise was not freely offered for sale for home consumption in Japan or for export to the United States.

> That on or about the date of exportation such or similar imported merchandise was not freely offered for sale in the principal markets of the United States.

> That the cost of the production of the involved merchandise as defined in Section 402a (f) was the entered value of the merchandise in each instance.

> That the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in Schedule “A” may be submitted on this stipulation, the same being limited to the items marked “A” as aforesaid and abandoned in all other respects.

On the agreed facts, I find that the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question, as hereinabove identified, is statutory cost of production and hold that such value for the said merchandise is, in each instance, the entered value. As to all other merchandise included on the invoices covered by the entries involved herein, the appeals for reappraisement are dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM INTERIM
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS AT MARCH 31, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998             MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                         179,427                 400,235
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                7,056,202               5,174,136
<ALLOWANCES>                                   105,623                 991,166
<INVENTORY>                                  5,723,775               5,996,220
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            13,278,622              10,916,809
<PP&E>                                       4,201,591               3,369,683
<DEPRECIATION>                               2,200,997               1,922,854
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              16,179,828              13,071,773
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,917,521               8,561,518
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          1                       1
<COMMON>                                           162                     162
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,267,488               1,590,932
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                16,179,828              13,071,773
<SALES>                                      6,506,589               4,925,180
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             6,506,589               4,925,180
<CGS>                                        4,078,108               2,920,969
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,410,420               1,510,230
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 4,730                  79,132
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             131,181                  54,956
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                882,150                 518,157
<INCOME-TAX>                                   353,000                 198,612
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            529,150                 319,515
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                   529,150                 319,515
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .20                     .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0                       0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 32(i)



CERTIFICATIONS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



The undersigned hereby certifies that, to his knowledge, (i) the Form 10-KSB filed by
Carolina Bank Holdings, Inc. (the Issuer) for the year ended December 31, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and (ii) the information contained in that
report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Issuer on the dates and for the periods presented therein.



|                     |  |                              |  |                                                 
|-------------------- |  | ---------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------
|                     |  | Carolina Bank Holdings, Inc.
|                     |  |                             
|Date: March 29, 2004 |  | By:                          |  | /s/ Robert T. Braswell                          
|                     |  |                              |  | Robert T. Braswell                              
|                     |  |                              |  | President and Chief Executive Officer           
|                     |  |                             
|Date: March 29, 2004 |  | By:                          |  | /s/ T. Allen Liles                              
|                     |  |                              |  | T. Allen Liles                                  
|                     |  |                              |  | Chief Financial and Principal Accounting Officer