alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
## PRD Label Data Report: Food/Feed & Non-Food/Non-Feed Uses Considered in Registration Review **Work Planning** Clodinafop-propargy l (125203) 

### Note: This is an aggregate report of registered uses for this chemical. Label data for chemicals with more than one pesticide product are presented in aggregate form (i.e. each line of data may be a combination of data from one or more pesticide).**F o** **o d** **( F** **) /** **N o** **n -** **f o** **o d** **( N** **)**

**Use Site Formulation Desc**  **A. I. Max App Rate/App**  **Max # Apps /**

**CC A. I. Max** 

**App Rate/CC**  **Max # Apps**

**/ Year A. I. Max App** 

**Rate/Year Minimum** 

**Retreatment Interval**  **Minimum**

**Reentry Interval**  **PGI / PHI / PSI Allow Geo Restrictions**  **DisAllow Geo Restrictions**  **Limitations** F WH EAT EMULSIFIABLE CONCENTRATE .0632 lb / a 1 NS NS NS NS 12 hr G01(30) || G83(30) || H11(60) No Restrictions No Restrictions C20 || C46 || CAU || CDC || CMP(10) || CPE || CRF(.5) || CRO || CW H || CW L F WH EAT EMULSIFIABLE CONCENTRATE NDC 1 NS NS NS NS 12 hr G01(30) || G83(30) || H11(60) No Restrictions No Restrictions C20 || C46 || CAU || CDC || CMP(10) || CPE || CRF(.5) || CRO || CW H || CW L

Product is rainfast __ hours after application. Endangered species restriction.

C (RO) Please refer to the label for rotational crop restrictions. C (W H) Do not contaminate water by cleaning of equipment or disposal of equipment wash waters. C (MP) Do not apply aerially when wind speed is greater than __ mph.
C (PE) PPE (Protective Personal Equipment) language is found on the label. Please see issues report to read specific instructions. C (RF)

Each row of this report is determined by the unique combination of the food/nonfood indicator, use site, formulation, and maximum application rate per application (key columns). The remaining, non-key columns of the report display either worse case or aggregate data from the label information that defines the unique data row. Note that each non-key column does not necessarily relate to any other non-key column with in the same row. G (83) __ day(s) prefeeding interval. H (11) __ day(s) preharvest interval (grain). 

### Current As Of Date : 6/1/2012

**NDC - No Dosage Conversion ; NS - Not Specified**

**Limitation Code Limitation Description**  C (20)

C (W L) Do not contaminate water, food, or feed by storage or disposal. G (01) __ day(s) pregrazing interval. Do not apply directly to water, or to areas where surface water is present or to intertidal areas below the mean high water mark. C (46) Do not apply through any type of irrigation system.
C (AU) C (DC) Do not apply when drift is likely to occur.



### Page 1 of 1
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION**In connection with the Quarterly Report of Midwest Banc Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon November 9, 2005 (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.       /s/ James J. Giancola     Name: James J. Giancola  Title: President and
No. 55838.

protests 143297-K, etc. (Boston).

#### Chong Long Kee et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The protests were dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of J.Crew Group, Inc. and (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 29,
2006 (the Report), we, Millard S. Drexler, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and James S. Scully, Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of each of our knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: September 11, 2006



|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Millard S. Drexler                                              
|Millard S. Drexler Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer
|                                                                    
|/s/ James S. Scully                                                 
|James S. Scully Executive Vice President
and Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
EX-4.1





 Exhibit 4.1 
  

					
	NUMBER	  	[Vignette]	  	                    
	SSP                     	  		  	SHARES

 APA 

CORPORATION 
  

			
		  	 INCORPORATED UNDER THE
LAWS                    
 OF THE STATE OF
DELAWARE                    

	 COMMON STOCK
	  	COMMON STOCK                    
		
	 This Certifies that
                                
	  	                    CUSIP
	 	  	                    SEE REVERSE FOR CERTAIN DEFINITIONS
	 PAR VALUE

	 $         EACH

	
	 is the owner of
                                


 CERTIFICATE OF STOCK 

FULLY PAID AND NON-ASSESSABLE SHARES OF THE COMMON STOCK OF APA Corporation, transferable on the books
of the Corporation by the holder hereof in person or by duly authorized attorney upon surrender of this certificate properly endorsed. This certificate is not valid until countersigned by the Transfer Agent and registered by the Registrar. 

Witness the signatures of its duly authorized officers. 

Countersigned and Registered: 

EQUINITI TRUST COMPANY 
 TRANSFER
AGENT 
 AND REGISTRAR 
  

	
	/s/
	CHAIRMAN

  

					
	/s/	 		 	
	SECRETARY	 	By	 	  

		 		 	AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE
			
		 	DATED:	 	                    













 APA CORPORATION 

The following abbreviations, when used in the inscription on the face of this certificate, shall be construed as though they were written out
in full according to applicable laws or regulations: 
  

													
	TEN COM	 	 — as tenants in common
	 		 	UNIF TRF MIN ACT —	 	                     Custodian            
         	 	
	TEN ENT	 	 — as tenants by the entireties
	 	            	 		 	        (Cust)	 		 	(Minor)
	JT TEN	 	 — as joint tenants with right of survivorship and not as tenants in
common
	 		 		 	under Uniform Transfers to Minors	 	
		 		 		 	Act
                                         
       	 	
		 		 		 		 	(State)    	 	

 Additional abbreviations may also be used though not in the above list. 

For value received,
                     hereby sell, assign and transfer unto 

 

	
	 PLEASE INSERT SOCIAL SECURITY OR OTHER

IDENTIFYING NUMBER OF ASSIGNEE

	 
	  
  

PLEASE PRINT OR TYPEWRITE NAME AND ADDRESS INCLUDING POSTAL ZIP CODE OF ASSIGNEE

	  
  

	  
  

                 Shares of the
capital stock represented by the within Certificate, and do hereby irrevocably constitute and
appoint                                        
     

	  
  

Attorney to transfer the said stock on the books of the within-named Corporation with full power of substitution in
the premises.
  
  


 Dated,
                     
  

					
	NOTICE: THE SIGNATURE(S) TO THIS ASSIGNMENT MUST CORRESPOND WITH THE NAME(S) AS WRITTEN UPON THE FACE OF THE CERTIFICATE IN EVERY PARTICULAR, WITHOUT ALTERATION OR ENLARGEMENT OR ANY CHANGE
WHATEVER.	  	



	  	  

    
  


  

	
	THE SIGNATURE(S) SHOULD BE GUARANTEED BY ELIGIBLE GUARANTOR INSTITUTION (Banks, Stockbrokers, Savings and Loan Associates and Credit Unions), WITH MEMBERSHIP IN
AN APPROVED SIGNATURE GUARANTEE MEDALLION PROGRAM PURSUANT TO S.E.C. RULE 17Ad-15.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) Criminal No. 05-02-1

)

v. )

)

TIMOTHY MENTZER )

DEFENSE MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE OF SENTENCING

AND NOW, comes your defendant, Timothy Mentzer by and through counsel, Robert D.

Beyer, respectfully moves the Court as follows:

1. On July 28, 2005, your defendant entered his plea of guilty to Count 3 of the

superseding information before the Honorable Petrese B. Tucker.

2. Sentencing is currently scheduled for November 1, 2005, at 9:30 a.m.

3. Defendant respectfully requests that the sentencing date be continued for six months

in order to facilitate compliance with the terms of the plea agreement.

4. Trial Attorney from the United States Department of Justice, Clement McGovern

has no objection to the continuance requested.

Case 2:05-cr-00002-PBT Document 16 Filed 10/13/05 Page 1 of 3
WHEREFORE, the defendant respectfully requests that the sentencing be continued to a

later date.

Respectfully submitted,

GOLDBERG, KNISELY & BEYER

Date: 10.13.05 By: ______________________________

Robert D. Beyer, Esquire

40 East Grant Street

Lancaster, PA 17602

Telephone No. (717) 393-2500

Fax No. (717) 393-2747

Attorney I.D. No. 37970

Case 2:05-cr-00002-PBT Document 16 Filed 10/13/05 Page 2 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) Criminal No. 05-02-1

)

v. )

)

TIMOTHY MENTZER )

CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have on even date herewith served a copy of the within Defense

Motion for Continuance of Sentencing on the following, and in the manner indicated below:

Service by electronic mail and regular United States mail, addressed as follows:

Clement J. McGovern, Trial Attorney

Computer Crime & Intellectual Property Section

United States Department of Justice

1301 New York Ave., Suite 600

Washington, DC 20530

Date: 10.13.05 By: ______________________________

Robert D. Beyer, Esquire

40 East Grant Street

Lancaster, PA 17602

Telephone No. (717) 393-2500

Fax No. (717) 393-2747

Attorney I.D. No. 37970

Case 2:05-cr-00002-PBT Document 16 Filed 10/13/05 Page 3 of 3
(Reap. Dec. 10318)

Entry No. 3845, etc.

#### Unitron Import Corporation J. T. Steeb & Co., Inc. *v.*United States

*369(Decided August 29, 1962)

*Lawrence & Tuttle*for the plaintiffs.

*Joseph D. Guilfoyle,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

OliveR, Chief Judge:

Counsel for tbe parties have submitted the appeals for reappraisement enumerated in the attached schedule for decision upon stipulation, reading as follows:

> 1. That the merchandise and the issues involved in the appeals for reap-praisement enumerated in Schedule “A” hereto attached and made a part hereof are the same in all material respects as those involved in *United States*v. *Gitkin Co.,*A.R.D. 132, and that the record in the cited case may be incorporated in the record herein.

> 2. That at the time of 'exportation of the merchandise involved herein, the prices at which such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the country of exportation for exportation to the United States, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise in condition packed ready for shipment to the United States, were the appraised values, less the amounts described on the invoices under the heading “Actual Charges”.

> 3. That the involved merchandise was entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after February 27, 1958, and is not identified in the Final List published by the Secretary of the Treasury pursuant to the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 (T.D. 54521).

On the agreed facts, I find export value, as defined in section 402 (b), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, to be the proper basis for the determination of the values of the merchandise involved and that such values were the appraised values, less the amounts described on the invoices under the heading “Actual Charges.”

Judgment will issue accordingly.
# C_2017424EN.01001501.xml

| 11.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 424/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 424/15

---

Order of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 12 October 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione tributaria di Secondo Grado di Bolzano — Italy) — Agenzia delle Entrate — Direzione provinciale Ufficio controlli di Bolzano v Palais Kaiserkron Srl

(Case C-549/16) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Taxation - Common system of value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Article 401 - Concept of ‘turnover tax’ - Leasing of immovable property used for the purposes of trade - Liability to pay registration duty and VAT))

(2017/C 424/21)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Commissione tributaria di Secondo Grado di Bolzano

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Agenzia delle Entrate — Direzione provinciale Ufficio controlli di Bolzano

Applicant:

Defendant: Palais Kaiserkron Srl

Defendant:

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

Article 401 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as not precluding the charging of a proportional registration duty affecting commercial leases, such as that laid down by the national legislation at issue in the main proceedings, even when those leases are also subject to value added tax.

---

(1)  OJ C 30, 30.01.2017

1

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF****Principal Executive Officer**

**CERTIFICATION OF****Principal Financial Officer**

**CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Digital Brands Media and Marketing Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the periods ending August 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Linda Perry, Executive Director, Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

| Date:  September 30, 2019 | */s/ Linda Perry*                                                            |
|-------------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                | Linda Perry                                                                  |
|                                | Principal Executive Officer

Principal Financial Officer

Executive Director |
# C_2018399EN.01000401.xml

| 5.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 399/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 399/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 6 September 2018 — Bundesverband Souvenir — Geschenke — Ehrenpreise eV v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), Freistaat Bayern

(Case C-488/16 P) (1)

((Appeal - EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Word mark NEUSCHWANSTEIN - Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) - Absolute grounds for refusal - Descriptive character - Indication of geographical origin - Distinctive character - Article 52(1)(b) - Bad faith))

(2018/C 399/04)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Appellant: Bundesverband Souvenir — Geschenke — Ehrenpreise eV (represented by: B. Bittner, Rechtsanwalt)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: D. Botis, A. Schifko and D. Walicka, acting as Agents), Freistaat Bayern (represented by: M. Müller, Rechtsanwalt)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Bundesverband Souvenir — Geschenke — Ehrenpreise eV to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Bundesverband Souvenir — Geschenke — Ehrenpreise eV to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 6, 9.1.2017.

---
May 21, 1963

No. 67756.

Appeal 5097.

#### Ellis K. Orlowitz Co. *v.*United States.

A.R.D. 136 affirmed February 13,1963. C.A.D. 816.
# C_2015155EN.01003102.xml

| 11.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/31

---

Action brought on 27 February 2015 — Dextro Energy v Commission

(Case T-100/15)

(2015/C 155/37)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Dextro Energy GmbH & Co. KG (Krefeld, Germany) (represented by: Rechtsanwälte M. Hagenmeyer and T. Teufer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/8 of 6 January 2015 refusing to authorise certain health claims made on foods, other than those referring to the reduction of disease risk and to children’s development and health (OJ 2015 L 3, p. 6); |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Commission Regulation (EU) 2015/8 of 6 January 2015 refusing to authorise certain health claims made on foods, other than those referring to the reduction of disease risk and to children’s development and health (OJ 2015 L 3, p. 6);

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.

First plea in law, alleging an infringement of Article 18(4) of Regulation No 1924/2006 (1)

1

The applicant claims that there are no grounds to justify the refusal to authorise the five health claims which have nonetheless received five favourable scientific assessments from the European Food Safety Authority. Those five health claims neither infringe generally accepted nutrition and health principles, nor convey a conflicting and confusing message to consumers. They are also neither ambiguous nor misleading.

Second plea in law, alleging a lack of proportionality

The applicant claims that, in view of the favourable opinion of the European Food Safety Authority on the applicant’s five health claims, the absolute ban on advertising resulting from the rejection of those health claims was disproportionate.

Third plea in law, alleging an infringement of the principle of equality

The applicant submits that the defendant has refused to authorise scientifically uncontested health claims despite having authorised similar health claims in the past.

Fourth plea in law, alleging a failure to provide sufficient grounds

Finally, the applicant claims that the contested regulation does not provide sufficient grounds; it cannot be discerned whether the defendant took into account the arguments of the applicant and of the public, nor whether it even carried out an independent appraisal of those arguments.

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006 on nutrition and health claims made on foods (OJ 2006 L 404, p. 9).

1

---
# Novement 2022
# C_2015198EN.01004601.xml

| 15.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 198/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 198/46

---

Action brought on 23 April 2015 — Zitro IP v OHIM (WORLD OF BINGO)

(Case T-203/15)

(2015/C 198/63)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Zitro IP Sàrl (Luxembourg, Luxembourg) (represented by: A. Canela Giménez, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘WORLD OF BINGO’ — Application for registration No 12 552 162

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 23 February 2015 in Case R 1900/2014-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
No. 51932.

#### Biddle Sawyer & Co. (U. S. A.), Ltd., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 118971-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The protests were dismissed.