alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017104EN.01002701.xml

| 3.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 104/27 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 104/27

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 19 December 2016 — Peter Valach and Others v Waldviertler Sparkasse Bank AG and Others

(Case C-649/16)

(2017/C 104/40)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Oberster Gerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Peter Valach, Alena Valachová, Europa SC ZV II a.s., Europa SC LV a.s., VAV Parking a.s., Europa SC BB a.s., Byty A s.r.o.

Applicants:

Defendants: Waldviertler Sparkasse Bank AG, Československá obchodná banka a.s., City of Banská Bystrica

Defendants:

Question referred

Question referred

Is Article 1(2)(b) of Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2012 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters (1) to be interpreted as meaning that an action brought by the holders of shares in an insolvent company — as is the case of the first and second applicants — and by project companies in a business relationship with the insolvent company — as is the case of the third to seventh applicants — which is founded on a claim in tort for damages against members of a creditors’ committee in respect of voting impropriety regarding a restructuring plan in connection with insolvency proceedings concerns insolvency within the meaning of Article 1(2)(b) of Regulation No 1215/2012 and is for that reason excluded from the scope ratione materiae of that regulation?

1

ratione materiae

---

(1)  OJ 2012 L 351, p. 1.

1

---
# C_2016326EN.01000703.xml

| 5.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/7

---

Appeal brought on 25 January 2016 by Min Liu against the judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) delivered on 18 November 2015 in Case T-813/14: Liu v EUIPO

(Case C-41/16 P)

(2016/C 326/13)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Min Liu (represented by: Y. Zhang, Rechtsanwalt)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings:

By order of 8 June 2016 the Court of Justice (Eight Chamber) held that the appeal was inadmissible.

---
The.major impurityin the N1-(6-aminohexyl)-1,6-hexanediamine used is 1,6 hexanediamine. Reaction of carbon

disulfide

and sodium

hydroxide

could yield, in the reaction

scheme as stated, Carbamodithioic

Acid,N,N'-1,6-hexanediylbis-sodium salt. (CAS

No.871-67-Ol.
Weeldenburg,

J. G. (1928),

The action

of sodium

hydroxide

on carbon

disulphide.

Recl. Trav. Chim. Pays-Bas,

47:496-512. doi: L}.tD2/recl.19280470606 shows that carbondisulfide

is known to react with an excess

of alkali metal hydroxide

to yield alkali

metal trithiocarbonate

and alkali

metalcarbonate. Thus small excesses

of carbon

disulfide

in the reaction

sequence

as described

could potentially

yield small amounts

of sodium

trithiocarbonate

and sodium

carbonate.

(CAS number 534-18-9

and 497-19-8 resepctively)
### NUMBER 13

- 1 8

- 00 6 14

- C R



## COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI

- EDINBURG

ELOY HERACLIO ALCALA

, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On a ppeal from the 332nd District Court

of Hidalgo County, Texas.



## ORDER TO FILE APPELLATE BRIEF

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Hinojosa and Tijerina

Order Per Curiam

This cause is currently before the Court on appellant's second motion for extension

of time to file the brief. The reporter’s record was filed on May 6, 2019 , and a ppellant ’ s

brief was originally due to be filed thirty days thereafter. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 38.6(a).

Appellant’s first motion for extension of time to file the brief was gra nted in part and denied2

in part. The Court denied a 120

- day extension and granted a 90

- day extension of time

to file the brief. A ppellant now seeks an additional 90 days, until November 3, 2019 , to

file the brief.

The Co urt GRANTS appellant’s second motion for extension to file the brief and

ORDERS the Honorable Victoria Guerra to file the brief on or before November 3, 2019

.

The Court looks with disfavor on the delay caused by counsel’s failure to timely file a brief

in this matter. No further extensions will be granted absent exigent circumstances. If

counsel fails to file the brief within the specified period of time, the Court will act

appropriately to ensure that appellant's rights are protected. See id. R. 38.8(b)(4).

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the

11th day of September

, 201 9

.
# C_2017121EN.01001201.xml

| 18.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 121/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 121/12

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio (Italy) lodged on 19 December 2016 — Elliot International Lp and Others v Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa (Consob)

(Case C-658/16)

(2017/C 121/17)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Elliot International Lp, The Liverpool Limited Partnership, Elliot Associates L.P.

Applicants:

Defendant: Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa (Consob)

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Is the proper application of the first and second subparagraphs of Article 5(4) of Directive 2004/25/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on takeover bids, (1) in the light of the general principles laid down in Article 3(1) thereof, and in the light of the proper application of the general principles relating to the protection of legitimate expectations, proportionality, reasonableness, transparency and non-discrimination, prevented by a provision of national law such as Article 106(3)(d)(2) of Legislative Decree No 58 of 24 February 1998 (consolidating all provisions in the field of financial intermediation within the meaning of Articles 8 and 21 of Law No 52 of 6 February 1996), as subsequently amended, and Article 47 octies of the Decision of the Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa — Consob No 11971 of 14 May 1999 (Order implementing Legislative Decree No 58 of 24 February 1998 laying down rules applicable to offerees), as subsequently amended, in so far as those provisions, in authorising Consob to increase the price of the takeover bid as referred to in Article 106 where collusion is found to have taken place between the offeror or the persons acting in concert with it, on the one hand, and one or more sellers, on the other hand, simply refer to the criterion of the ‘price ascertained’ without specifying the parameters and criteria for such a finding?

1

octies

---

(1)  OJ 2004 L 142, p. 12.

1

---
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION**In connection with the Quarterly Report of Midwest Banc Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onAugust 9, 2006 (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.       /s/James J. Giancola     Name: James J. Giancola  Title: President and    Chief Executive Officer  Date: August 9, 2006       /s/Daniel R. Kadolph     Name: Daniel R. Kadolph  Title: Executive Vice President and    Chief Financial Officer  Date: August 9, 2006
**Exhibit 32.1****Certification Pursuant To****18 U.S.C. Section 1350****As Adopted Pursuant To****Section 906 Of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002**     This certification is provided pursuant to § 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. § 1350,and accompanies the Quarterly Report onForm 10-Q for theperiod ended June 30, 2006 of Horizon Offshore, Inc. (theCompany) as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onthe date hereof (the Report).     I, David W. Sharp, President and Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, certify that:          (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of    section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of    1934; and           (2) The information contained in the Report fairly    presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and    results of operations of the Company.     /s/ David W. Sharp       David W. Sharp *President and Chief Executive Officer*August 9, 2006
# C_2017144EN.01001401.xml

| 8.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 144/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 144/14

---

Appeal brought on 14 November 2016 by TVR Italia Srl against the order of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) made on 9 September 2016 in Case T-277/16, TVR Italia v EUIPO — TVR Automotive (TVR ITALIA)

(Case C-576/16 P)

(2017/C 144/19)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Appellant: TVR Italia Srl (represented by: F. Caricato, avvocato)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office, TVR Automotive Ltd

Other parties to the proceedings:

By order of 2 March 2017 the Court of Justice (Eighth Chamber) dismissed the appeal and ordered TVR Italia Srl to bear its own costs.

---
Before the Second Division,

February 5, 1952

No. 56343.

protest 153874-K (Norfolk).

#### P. C. Beck Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

La1whence, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise consist of ferrous or nonferrous materials of which ferrous or nonferrous metal is the component material of chief value, which are secondhand or waste or refuse, or are obsolete, defective, or damaged, and which are fit only to be remanufac-tured. Upon the agreed statement of facts, it was held that the merchandise comes within the provisions of Public Law 869, *supra,*and is properly entitled to free entry.
# C_2018094EN.01001901.xml

| 12.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 94/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 94/19

---

Judgment of the General Court of 26 January 2018 — Centro Clinico e Diagnostico G.B. Morgagni v Commission

(Case T-172/16) (1)

1

((State aid - Reduced taxes and contributions due from undertakings located in areas affected by natural disasters occurring in Italy - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery - Action for annulment - Potential beneficiary as the holder of an acquired right - Direct and individual concern - Admissibility - Equal treatment - Legitimate expectations))

(2018/C 094/24)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Centro Clinico e Diagnostico G.B. Morgagni Srl (Catania, Italy) (represented by: E. Castorina, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Stancanelli and V. Bottka, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Principally, an application seeking ‘an EU-law-compatible interpretation’ of Commission Decision (EU) 2016/195 of 14 August 2015 on State aid measures SA.33083 (12/C) (ex 12/NN) implemented by Italy providing for reduced taxes and contributions linked to natural disasters (all sectors except agriculture) and SA.35083 (12/C) (ex 12/NN), implemented by Italy providing for reduced taxes and contributions linked to the earthquake in Abruzzo in 2009 (all sectors except agriculture) (OJ 2016 L 43, p. 1) and, in the alternative, an application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking the annulment of that decision.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Centro Clinico e Diagnostico G.B. Morgagni Srl to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Centro Clinico e Diagnostico G.B. Morgagni Srl to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 211, 13. 6. 2016.

1

---
# C_2017112EN.01001501.xml

| 10.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/15

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny (Poland) lodged on 22 December 2016 — Minister Finansów v Gmina Wrocław

(Case C-665/16)

(2017/C 112/23)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Referring court

Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant in cassation: Minister Finansów

Appellant in cassation:

Respondent in the appeal in cassation: Gmina Wrocław

Respondent in the appeal in cassation:

Questions referred

Questions referred

Does the transfer, pursuant to the law, of the ownership of immovable property owned by a municipality to the State Treasury in return for payment of compensation, in the case where, under the rules of national law, that immovable property continues to be managed by the mayor of the municipality, who is simultaneously the representative of the State Treasury and the executive body of the municipality, constitute a taxable transaction within the meaning of Article 14(2)(a) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax? (1)

1

In answering that question, is it significant whether the compensation paid to the municipality consists of an actual payment or is a mere internal accounting transfer within the municipal budget?

---

(1)  OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1.

1

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MARA FLAMM : CIVIL ACTION

:

 :

v. :

:

SARNER & ASSOCIATES, P.C., et al.: NO. 02-4302

O R D E R

AND NOW, TO WIT: this 1st day of June, 2006,it having

been reported that the issues between the parties in the above

action have been settled and upon Order of the Court pursuant to

the provisions of Rule 41.1(b) of the Local Rules of Civil

Procedure of this Court (effective January 1, 1970), it is

ORDERED that the above action is DISMISSED with

prejudice, pursuant to agreement of counsel.

BY THE COURT:

 S/M. FAITH ANGELL 

M. FAITH ANGELL

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Civ 12 (1/96)

41.1(b)

Date: June 1, 2006 

By Fax: Laurence A. Mester, Esq. 215-665-1393

Robert P. Brand, Esq. 215-546-5355 

James W. Christie, Esq. 215-587-1699 

William F. McDevitt, Esq. 215-587-1699 

Bayard H. Graf, Esq. (610) 695-9065 

Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 84 Filed 06/05/2006 Page 1 of 1
# C_2016145EN.01003901.xml

| 25.4.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 145/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.4.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 145/39

---

Action brought on 5 February 2016 — ZZ v EMA

(Case F-8/16)

(2016/C 145/48)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: L. Levi and A. Blot, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Medicines Agency (EMA)

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the applicant’s staff report for 2014 and the decision of 1 April 2015 of the authority empowered to conclude contracts of employment not to renew the applicant’s contract as a member of the temporary staff and claim for damages for the non-pecuniary harm allegedly suffered.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the applicant’s staff report covering the period from 16 February 2014 to 31 December 2014, as finalised on 31 March 2015 by the Assessor and countersigned by the applicant on 14 April 2015; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the applicant’s staff report covering the period from 16 February 2014 to 31 December 2014, as finalised on 31 March 2015 by the Assessor and countersigned by the applicant on 14 April 2015;

| — | Annul the decision of the AECCE of 1 April 2015 not to renew the applicant’s contract as a member of the temporary staff; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of the AECCE of 1 April 2015 not to renew the applicant’s contract as a member of the temporary staff;

| — | Annul both decisions of the AECCE of 26 October 2015 rejecting the two claims made by the applicant of 30 June 2015 against the two abovementioned decisions; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul both decisions of the AECCE of 26 October 2015 rejecting the two claims made by the applicant of 30 June 2015 against the two abovementioned decisions;

| — | Award the applicant damages in the sum of EUR 10 000; |
| --- | --- |

—

Award the applicant damages in the sum of EUR 10 000;

| — | Order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the defendant to pay the costs.

---
No. 66241.

#### Air Clearance Association, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 314050-K(B), etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

The record establishing that the merchandise consists of nylon hose or underwear similar in use to silk hose or underwear and following *United States*v. *Steinberg Bros.*(47 C.C.P.A. 47, C.A.D. 727), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
# May 2015
Case 2:04-cv-03649-RBS Document 23 Filed 05/12/09 Page 1 of 1
No. 56322.

protests 172325-K, etc. (New York).

#### Continental Merchandise Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 41-2 Filed 03/01/2007 Page 1 of 1
**EXHIBIT 32.2**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350As Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Badger State Ethanol, LLC (the“Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, (the “Report”),I, James Leitzinger, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuantto 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, that:

 
| 1.     |   | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)  or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                           |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                  |
| 2.     |   | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all  material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the  Company. |

 

 

March 25, 2004

 

 
|   | /s/ James Leitzinger    |   |
|--------|-------------------------|--------|
|   | James Leitzinger        |
|   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
# C_2017374EN.01000702.xml

| 6.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 374/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 374/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 September 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação do Porto — Portugal) — José Joaquim Neto de Sousa v Portuguese State

(Case C-506/16) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles - Directive 72/166/EEC - Directive 84/5/EEC - Directive 90/232/EEC - Driver responsible for the accident which caused the death of his spouse, a passenger in the vehicle - National legislation excluding compensation for material damage suffered by the driver responsible for the accident))

(2017/C 374/10)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal da Relação do Porto

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: José Joaquim Neto de Sousa

Applicant:

Defendant: Portuguese State

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Council Directive 72/166/EEC of 24 April 1972 on the approximation of the laws of Member States relating to insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles, and to the enforcement of the obligation to insure against such liability, Second Council Directive 84/5/EEC of 30 December 1983 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles, as amended by Directive 2005/14/EC of 11 May 2005, and Third Council Directive 90/232/EEC of 14 May 1990 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to insurance against civil liability in respect of the use of motor vehicles, must be interpreted as not precluding national provisions which allow exclusion of the right of a driver of a motor vehicle responsible, by his own fault, for a traffic accident as a result of which his spouse, a passenger in that vehicle, has died, to receive compensation for the material harm which he has suffered as a result of that death.

---

(1)  OJ C 454, 5.12.2016.

1

---