alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THE FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED
FROM THE UNAUDITED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF HORIZON OFFSHORE, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2000 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY
REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>       1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                    9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                           6,903
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   36,907
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      2,478
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                60,689
<PP&E>                                         193,034
<DEPRECIATION>                                 (15,669)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 241,901
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           51,170
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,139
<OTHER-SE>                                      93,280
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   241,901
<SALES>                                        108,780
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               108,780
<CGS>                                           90,848
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   97,656
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               5,449
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  5,675
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,087
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,588
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                        1,381
<NET-INCOME>                                     4,969
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.26
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.26


</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report of ProtoKinetix, Inc., a Nevada corporation,
(the “Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),
I, Ross L. Senior, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify the following
pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.





/s/ Ross L.
Senior


Ross L.
Senior


Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer





April 14,
2008
No. 59464.

protest 250172-K (New York).

#### S. S. Koppe & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

*310Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Since the protest was filed more than 60 days after liquidation, it was dismissed as untimely, by virtue of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.
EXHIBIT 32.1

Certification  Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

I,
Wei Zhou, President and Chief Executive Officer of INTAC International, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the "Act") that
to my knowledge on the date hereof:

|Dated: March 15, 2005 |  |                                                          
|--------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------
|                      |  | /s/WEI ZHOUWei Zhou
President and Chief Executive Officer

This
certification is being furnished solely for purposes of Section 906 of the Act, and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act of 1934,
or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.

---



QuickLinks
# C_2019155EN.01003601.xml

| 6.5.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 155/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.5.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 155/36

---

Judgment of the General Court of 19 March 2019 — Italy and Others v Commission

(Joined Cases T-98/16, T 196/16 and T-198/16) (1)

(State aid - Intervention by a consortium governed by private law of banks in favour of one of its members - Intervention authorised by the Central Bank of the Member State - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market - Action for annulment - Definition of State aid - Whether imputable to the State - State resources)

(2019/C 155/42)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant in Case T-98/16: Italian Republic (represented by: G. Palmieir, Agent, S. Fiorentino and P. Gentili, avvocati dello Stato)

Applicant in Case T-196/16: Banca Popolare di Bari SCpA, formerly Tercas-Cassa di risparmio della provincia di Teramo SpA (Banca Tercas SpA) (Teramo, Italy) (represented by: A. Santa Maria, M. Crisostomo, E. Gambaro and F. Mazzocchi, lawyers)

Applicant in Case T-198/16: Fondo interbancario di tutela dei depositi (Rome, Italy) (represented by: M. Siragusa, G. Scassellati Sforzolini and G. Faella, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: P. Stancanelli, L, Flynn, A. Bouchagiar and D. Recchia, Agents,)

Intervener in support of the applicant in Cast T-198/16: Banca d’Italia (represented by: M. Perassi, O. Capolino. M. Marcucci and M. Todino, lawyers)

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU for annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2016/1208 of 23 December 2015 on State aid SA.39451(2015/C) (ex 2015/NN) granted by Italy to the bank Tercas (OJ 2016 L 203 p. 1),

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls Commission Decision (EU) 2016/1208 of 23 December 2015 on State aid SA.39451(2015/C) (ex 2015/NN) granted by Italy to the bank Tercas); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls Commission Decision (EU) 2016/1208 of 23 December 2015 on State aid SA.39451(2015/C) (ex 2015/NN) granted by Italy to the bank Tercas);

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 145, 25.4.2016.

---
Exhibit 99.2

Certification of Principal Financial Officer

                  In connection  with the Annual Report of Pennexx  Foods,  Inc.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended  December 31, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Joseph Beltrami, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

                  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

                  (2) The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,
in all material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations of
the Company.



Date: March 31, 2003                                  /s/ Joseph Beltrami
                                                     -----------------------
                                                     Joseph Beltrami
                                                     Chief Financial Officer
No. 54535.

#### Cooper & Brase, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 153335-K (B), etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of BBCN Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) as amended by Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31,
2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Douglas J. Goddard, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350
of the United States Code, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented therein.

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



|                   |  |  |  |                                                     
|------------------ |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|Date: June 5, 2014 |  |  |  | /s/ Douglas J. Goddard                              
|                   |  |  |  | Douglas J. Goddard                                  
|                   |  |  |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

PATRICK L. TAYLOR,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 32 MAL 2023

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 27th day of June, 2023, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 122 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 122

   To prevent homeowners from being forced to pay taxes on forgiven 
                          mortgage loan debt.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 12, 2017

 Mr. Heller (for himself, Ms. Stabenow, Mr. Isakson, and Mr. Menendez) 
introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the 
                          Committee on Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To prevent homeowners from being forced to pay taxes on forgiven 
                          mortgage loan debt.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Mortgage Debt Tax Relief Act''.

SEC. 2. EXTENSION OF EXCLUSION FROM GROSS INCOME OF DISCHARGE OF 
              QUALIFIED PRINCIPAL RESIDENCE INDEBTEDNESS.

    (a) In General.--Subparagraph (E) of section 108(a)(1) of the 
Internal Revenue Code of 1986 is amended by striking ``January 1, 
2017'' each place it appears and inserting ``January 1, 2019''.
    (b) Effective Date.--The amendment made by this section shall apply 
to indebtedness discharged after December 31, 2016.
                                 <all>
```
United States Department of Agriculture
United States Department of Agriculture
United States Department of Agriculture
United States Department of Agriculture
United States Department of Agriculture
United States Department of Agriculture
United States Department of Agriculture
United States Department of Agriculture
United States Department of Agriculture
United States Department of Agriculture
United States Department of Agriculture
United States Department of Agriculture
United States Department of Agriculture
United States Department of Agriculture
United States Department of Agriculture
| 1.   | The      Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the      “Report”) of Saker Aviation Services, Inc. fully complies with the      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of      1934; and |
|----------------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| 2.   | The      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operation of Saker      Aviation Services, Inc. |
|----------------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| Date:               April      14, 2010 | By:    | /s/ Ronald J. Ricciardi                                                         |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                                               |   | Ronald      J. Ricciardi                                                                            |
|                                                                                                               |   | President      and Chief Executive Officer(principal      executive and principal financialofficer) |

----
#### Milton A. COREY, d/b/a Corey Financial Planning, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. MAST ROAD GRAIN AND BUILDING MATERIALS COMPANY, INC., et al., Defendants, Appellees.

No. 84-1003.

United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit.

Argued June 8, 1984.

Decided June 25, 1984.

*12Joseph F. Dugan, Boston, Mass., with whom Charles R. Capace, Boston, Mass., was on brief, for appellant.

Norman M. Clement, Boston, Mass., for appellees.

Before CAMPBELL, Chief Judge, STEWART,* Associate Justice (Retired), and BOWNES, Circuit Judge.

*

 Of the Supreme Court of the United States, sitting by designation.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the district court’s denial of plaintiff's Rule 60(b) motion for relief from a judgment of dismissal.

Plaintiff, a Massachusetts resident, filed this contract action in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts against Mast Road Grain and Building Materials Company, Inc., a New Hampshire corporation, and Harvey Dupuis, the president of the corporation and a New Hampshire resident. Defendants moved for dismissal under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b) for lack of personal jurisdiction. Plaintiff failed to respond within the ten days required by Local Rule 12 of the District Court for the District of Massachusetts. The district court therefore dismissed the suit. Plaintiff subsequently moved under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) for relief from the judgment of dismissal on the ground of excusable neglect. The district court denied the motion and plaintiff appealed.

The standard of review in the present case is clear: the district court may only be reversed for an abuse of discretion. *Pagan v. American Airlines, Inc.,*534 F.2d 990, 993 (1st Cir.1976). We find no abuse of discretion here. Plaintiff’s conduct and his excuses for noncomplianee with the local rule did not compel a finding of excusable neglect. The district court was entitled to insist upon compliance with its local rule in these circumstances. *See In re Harbour House Operating Corp.,*724 F.2d 1, 2-3 (1st Cir.1983) (strictly applying Rule 3(b) of the First Circuit Rules governing bankruptcy appeals).

Plaintiff argues that the court based its denial of relief not upon noncompliance with the rule but upon an incorrect *13finding that it lacked personal jurisdiction. The court wrote, “Even if I overlook the untimeliness of the plaintiffs filings under Local Rule 12, I am not satisfied that his affidavits sufficiently establish personal jurisdiction over the defendants.” We do not read this, however, as waiving reliance upon the untimeliness of the filing, but only as stating an added alternative reason. It is well settled that when reviewing a district court’s order for abuse of discretion, “[i]f a single ground supports the ... order, it is not reversible.” *Juneau Square Corp. v. First Wisconsin National Bank,*624 F.2d 798, 809 (7th Cir.1980); *Nuttall v. Reading Co.,*235 F.2d 546, 548 (3d Cir.1956). Since the court could properly decline to excuse plaintiff’s noncompliance with the local rule, we need not consider the court’s alternative proposition that it lacked personal jurisdiction.

*Affirmed.*
EXHIBIT 32.2

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection  with the Amendment No. 1 to Quarterly  Report of Integrated
Healthcare  Holdings,  Inc.  (the  "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
June 30,  2005,  as filed  with the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  (the
"Report"),  the  undersigned,  in the capacity and on the date indicated  below,
hereby  certifies  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    the Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company at the dates and for the period indicated.

      This  Certificate has not been, and shall not be deemed,  "filed" with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.


Dated:  April 6, 2006                  By:  /s/ Steven R. Blake
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Steven R. Blake
                                       Chief Financial Officer
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 59 Filed 06/07/2007 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 59 Filed 06/07/2007 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 99.1
  
 
 The
      DirectorsAlloy
      Steel International Inc.
              
              Grant
      Thornton (WA) Partnership42
      Mercantile Way
              
              ABN:
      17 735 344 518MALAGA
      WA 6090
              
              Level
      110
      Kings Park RoadWest
      Perth WA 6005Dear
      Sirs,
              
              PO
      BOX 570West
      Perth WA 6872T
      +61 8 9480 2000ALLOY
      STEEL INTERNATIONAL INC.
              
              F
      +61 8 9322 7787E
      admin@gtwa.com.auW
      www.grantthornton.com.au
  We
understand that you wish to attach our audit report on the financial statements
for the year ended 2007 to the company’s financial statements for the year ended
30 September 2008 to provide evidence that the comparative figures in the 2008
financial statements relating to income and expenditure and cash flows have been
audited.
 
 We write
to confirm that we have no objection to your attaching our audit report dated 14
January 2008 on the 2007 financial statements to the 2008 financial statements
for the purpose stated above.
 
 Yours
faithfully,
  /s/ J. W.
Vibert
 J.
W. Vibert
 Partner
 
 
 Liability
limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards
Legislation.
 
 Grant
Thornton (WA) Partnership is an independent business entitled to trade under the
international name Grant Thornton.
 Grant
Thornton is a trademark owned by Grant Thornton International and used under
licence by independent firms and entities throughout the
world.
(V. D. 31)

Entry No. 872518, etc.

#### Siber Hegner Co., Inc. *v.*United States

(Decided September 19, 1956)

*Sharretts, Paley & Carter (Jerome Fisch*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

These matters are presently before me on remands from classification proceedings decided by the first division of this court in *Siber Hegner Co., Inc.*v. *United States,*34 Cust. Ct. 357, Abstract 59014; *Siber Hegner Co., Inc.*v. *United States,*34 Cust. Ct. 409, Abstract 59154. The judgments entered therein stated: “* * * that the matters be remanded to a single judge in reappraisement pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d).”

The matters have been submitted for decision upon an agreed statement of facts entered into by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto.

Upon the agreed facts, I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (d)), to be the proper basis for determining the values of the involved merchandise and that such values are as set forth in schedule *“A,”*hereto attached and made a part hereof.

I further find such values to be the dutiable values of said merchandise.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION
  (1)
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 /s/ Roberto R. HerenciaName:
    
    Roberto R. HerenciaTitle:
    
    President andChief Executive OfficerDate:
    
    August 10, 2009/s/ JoAnn Sannasardo LilekName:
    
    JoAnn Sannasardo LilekTitle:
    
    Executive Vice President andChief Financial OfficerDate:
    
    August 10, 2009
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In re: WELLBUTRIN SR : CIVIL ACTION NO. 04-5525

ANTITRUST LITIGATION :

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

MEDICAL MUTUAL OF OHIO, INC. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 05-396

v. :

GLAXOSMITHKLINE PLC, et al. :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 31st day of August, 2010, upon careful consideration of the

defendants' motion for reconsideration of this court’s order denying the motion for

summary judgment on all claims (Docket # 04-5525, Document # 251) (Docket No. 05-

396, Document # 201) and the plaintiffs’ response thereto, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED

that the motion is DENIED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Lawrence F. Stengel 

LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J.
IPAC Operational Metrics for March 2017
­
Ott I^StXDJS* 

### S5im&^^_JL\m}<L ^^XLLo^si—to^i^o^J^ffi&k. £j^J^£L=Xb=o6^5h=Qj^l 

### ^/^jUj?r?vc_ss-,-^/2.~i^ fAtvA *i j±*r> uotzhiAj bfccai&g. / / . s. ; V^

X IjO^J 

### -fV *j^LJ?j£dB^VA^^^ ej9^, 

## j^uQa^/j^lost^-^aJMi^d^Jd^ steo^dL iNVtlop^ £>$_2<ghi7k 5oi?^ou^_6a!0—j?tei9^_dtii—J^vC—^UoJkjvi^wtoy_.2.Di^.u)tt3_ 

### JtdtJ—^kigSi^ 

## yvy "fe>W? C^jg,/ C,^ (Xjo. i-aosft^ro'

-1 ^J -RECEIVED* COURT OFCRIMrNALAPPEALS OCT 22 2015 AbeiAcosta,Gler^
rmz,.
# Statement of Net Cost

&"Arial,Bold"&12	

Agency Financial Report to Reclassified Statement of Net Cost Supplemental Crosswalk as of September 30, 2023

# Stmt of Operations & Chgs in NP

&12     	

Agency Financial Report to Reclassified Statement of Operations & Changes in Net Position Supplemental Crosswalk as of September 30, 2023
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:  May 9, 2007
    By:
    /s/ C. S. LiollioC. S. LiollioPresident and

Chief Executive Officer