alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 99(B)

                       AMERICAN HONDA FINANCE CORPORATION
                          ANNUAL COMPLIANCE CERTIFICATE


     I, John Weisickle, do hereby certify that I am the Vice President/Finance
of American Honda Finance Corporation, a California corporation (the "Company"),
and further certify on behalf of the Company in its capacity as servicer (the
"Servicer") under the Sale and Servicing Agreement (the "Agreement") dated as of
October 1, 2000 among the Servicer, American Honda Receivables Corp., as Seller,
Bankers Trust (Delaware), as Owner Trustee of Honda Auto Receivables 2000-1
Owner Trust and U.S. Bank National Association as Indenture Trustee as follows:

          (i) A review of the activities of the Servicer during the twelve month
     period ended March 31, 2002, and of its performance under the Agreement has
     been made under my supervision;

          (ii) To the best of my knowledge and information, based upon such
     review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Agreement
     throughout such period; and

          (iii) To the best of my knowledge and information, no Event of Default
     nor any event which with the giving of notice or lapse of time, or both,
     would become an Event of Default under the Agreement, has occurred or is
     continuing.

     This certificate is being delivered to the Trustee pursuant to Section 3.11
of the Sale and Servicing Agreement effective October 1, 2000, which terms and
conditions are incorporated in the Agreement.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 3rd day of June, 2002.



                                            /s/ John I. Weisickle
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Name:     J. I. Weisickle
                                            Title:    Vice President/Finance
Exhibit 32    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002   In connection with the Annual Report of FullCircle Registry, Inc. a Nevada corporation (the Company), on Form 10-KSB for the annual period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), I, Trent Oakley, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to my knowledge:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.      /s/Trent Oakley Trent Oakley Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer  Date: May 18, 2007
No. 52169.

protests 96091-K, etc. (New York).

#### Eugene Dietzgen Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Case 2:04-cr-00390-GEKP Document 203 Filed 09/28/22 Page 1 of 1
---

EXHIBIT 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO 
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Dorato Resources Inc.
(the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended January 31, 2012, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Anton J. Drescher, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

Dated: June 13, 2012

| | /s/
      Anton J. Drescher
| | ---------------------------
| | Anton J. Drescher          
| | Chief Financial Officer    

---
1

In The

Court of Appeals

Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont

____________________

NO. 09-16-00394-CR

____________________

JAKARI STONER, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

__________________________________________________________________ 

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court

Jefferson County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 12-15437

__________________________________________________________________ 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Appellant Jakari Stoner was indicted for indecency with a child, a seconddegree felony. See Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 21.11(a)(1), (d) (West 2011). Stoner

pleaded guilty pursuant to a plea bargain agreement. The trial court found the 

evidence sufficient to find Stoner guilty, but deferred further proceedings, placed

Stoner on community supervision for ten years, and assessed a fine of $500. The 

State subsequently filed a motion to revoke Stoner’s unadjudicated community 

supervision. Stoner pleaded “true” to two of the alleged violations of the terms of 
2

his community supervision. The trial court found that Stoner violated the conditions 

of his community supervision, found Stoner guilty of indecency with a child, and 

assessed punishment at fifteen years of confinement. Stoner then filed this appeal.

Stoner’s appellate counsel filed a brief that presents counsel’s professional 

evaluation of the record and concludes the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. 

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 

1978). Stoner filed a pro se brief in response. The Court of Criminal Appeals has 

held that we need not address the merits of issues raised in Anders briefs or pro se

responses. Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). 

Rather, an appellate court may determine either: (1) “that the appeal is wholly 

frivolous and issue an opinion explaining that it has reviewed the record and finds 

no reversible error”; or (2) “that arguable grounds for appeal exist and remand the 

cause to the trial court so that new counsel may be appointed to brief the issues.” Id.

We have determined that this appeal is wholly frivolous. We have 

independently examined the clerk’s records and the reporter’s record, and we agree 

that no arguable issues support an appeal. See id. Therefore, we find it unnecessary 
3

to order appointment of new counsel to re-brief the appeal. Cf. Stafford v. State, 813 

S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991). We affirm the trial court’s judgment.1

AFFIRMED. 

______________________________

 STEVE McKEITHEN

 Chief Justice

Submitted on August 24, 2017

Opinion Delivered September 27, 2017

Do Not Publish

Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger and Johnson, JJ.

 

1Appellant may challenge our decision in this case by filing a petition for 

discretionary review. See Tex. R. App. P. 68.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                       CONSENT OF PEDERSEN & HOUPT, P.C.
 
   
     Pedersen & Houpt, P.C. hereby consents to all references made to it in
Amendment No. 4 to this Registration Statement on Form S-1 of SpinCycle, Inc.,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 13, 1998.
    
 
                                          /s/   PEDERSEN & HOUPT, P.C.
 
                                          --------------------------------------
                                                  Pedersen & Houpt, P.C.
 
Chicago, Illinois
   
November 13, 1998
No. 57913.

protests 171394-K, etc. (Detroit).

#### F. W. Myers & Co. *v.*United States,

*425Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that the subject of *United States*v. *Geo. Wm. Rueff, Inc.*(41 C. C. P. A. 95, C. A. D. 535), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
November 20, 1961

No. 66227.

Suit 5022.

#### United States *v.*A. J. Taylor of Santa Fe, New Mexico.

C.D. 2128 affirmed February 6, 1961. C.A.D. 772.
Case 2:05-cv-00306-JD Document 37 Filed 12/20/05 Page 1 of 1
No. 65414.

#### Nozaki Associates, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 60/20712 (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Since the protest was filed more than 60 days after liquidation, it was dismissed as untimely, by virtue of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.
~-

GOODRICH

SERVICE BULLETIN

FOKKER F100 - FLIGHT CONTROL

HORIZONTAL STABILIZER CONTROL UNIT- DOG LINK ASSEMBLY

BOLT - NEW CONFIGURATION

~~------_. --_._-------_._---------------

SECTION i- PLANNING INFORMATION

1. EFFECTIVITY

Horizontal Stabilizer Control Unit Assembly PN 231DO-5/-5A1-5AAJ47/~g/-11, all serial

numbers.

2. CONCURRENT REQUIREMENTS

NA

3. REASON

A potential for corrosion exists at the dogbane link/bolt interface.

4. DESCRiPTION

PN 23233-3 is introduced with increased corrosion protection.

Bolt PN 23233-1 is removed and replaced with bolt PN 23233-3. Interface surfaces are

coated with GIC (corrosion inhibiting compound) and bolt PN 23233-3 is installed.

5. COMPLIANCE

Goodrich Landing Gear (fonnerly Menasco Aerospace) in concurrence with the aircraft

manufacturer recommends incorporation of this service bulletin at next shop visit.

6.

7.

APPROVAL

This bulletin contains no modification information that revises approved configurations,

and therefore does not require governmJntal or other regulatory agency approval.

,

The technical content of this Service Bulletin has been reviewed and accepted by

Fokker Services SV. (EASA. 21J.059).1

MANPOWER

No additional manhours are required to accomplish this Service Bulletin during normal

repair or overhaul.

8. MATERIAL COST AND AVAILABILITY

Parts required to accomplish this

prices from:

Goodrich Landing Gear Division,

1400 South Service Rd.

Oakville. Ontario. Canada

L6L 5Y7

service bulletin are available at current catalogue

Tele: 1·905-827-7777

Fax: 1·905-825·1583

23100-27 -29

I

Nov 14/08

Page 1 of 2
Goodrich Landing Gear Division

Goodrich Aerospace Canada ltd.

9. TOOLING

NA

10. WEIGHT AND BALANCE

NA

11. ELECTRICAL LOAD DATA

NA

12. REFERENCES

Menasco Aerospace Component Maintenance Manual 27 -41-01

13. OTHER PUBLICATIONS AFFECTED I

Menasco Aerospace Component Maintenance Manual 27-41-01

SECTION II - ACCOMPLISHMENT INSTRUCTIONS

NOTE: Numbers in parenthesis refer to CMM 27-41-01, IPL Figure-Item Number.

1. Disassembly

A. Disassemble HSCU at dogbane link bolt (1-70) as required (Ref. CMM 27-41-01).

Discard cotter pin (1-60), nut (1-65) and bolt (1-70).

2. Assembly

A. Apply corrosion inhibiting compound (Mastinox 6856K, CA 1000 or Cor-Ban 27L) on

mating surfaces of bolt PN 23233-3, washer (1-75) and new nut PN MS17825-10.

8. Align dogbane link with HSCU and install new bolt PN 23233-3. Install washer (1-75) and

new nut PN MS17825-10. I

C. Tighten and torque nut to 80 - 100 Ibf.in. plus run down torque. Safety with new cotter pin

(1-60). I

NOTE: Back-off nut to get locking feature alignrent, as required.

D. Reassemble HSCU, as required (Ref. CMM 27-41-01, ASSEMBLY).

3. Reidentification

CAUTION: DO NOT LETTER STAMP PART NUMBER WITH NAMEPLATE ON

HSCU. THIS CAN CAUSE DAMAGE TO CYLINDER.

A. Vibropeen 5B 27-29 and date accomplished in MOD. STATUS field of nameplate

(1-495).

SECTION 11I- MATERIAL INFORMATION

New PIN

23233-3

MS17825-10

MS24665-374

~

2

2

2

Keyword

Bolt

Nut

Cotler Pin

Old PIN Q!y

23233-1 2

MS17825-10 2

MS24665-374 2

Disposition

Discard

Discard

Discard

23100-27 -29

I

Nav 14/08

Page 2 of2
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

KENDRITH J. JONES,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 602 MAL 2017

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 21st day of February, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal

is DENIED

.
No. 57938.

protest 207503-K (New York).

#### F. L. Kraemer & Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is limited to that described on the invoice as “105 crates each 120 pieces 4" x 4“ (c. m. 10.3) red hexagons — natural clay red flooring tiles,” and “6 crates each 240 pieces halves red hexagons — natural clay red flooring tiles”; that the examiner reported the aforesaid merchandise to be 10.1 e. m.; and that the total actual area of the instant merchandise is 1,266.62 square feet. Accepting the stipulation as an agreed statement of fact, it was held that the hexagonal tiles in question are properly dutiable on the basis of the actual total area, amounting to 1,266.62 square feet.
# C_2017151EN.01003501.xml

| 15.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 151/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 151/35

---

Judgment of the General Court of 30 March 2017 — Apax Partners UK v EUIPO — Apax Partners Midmarket (APAX PARTNERS)

(Case T-209/16) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Application for the EU word mark APAX PARTNERS - Earlier international word mark APAX - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Similarity of the services - Article 8(1)(b) and Article 53(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2017/C 151/45)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Apax Partners UK Ltd (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: D. Rose and J. Warner, Solicitors)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Apax Partners Midmarket (Paris, France) (represented by: C. Joly, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 17 February 2016 (Case R 1611/2014-2), relating to invalidity proceedings between Apax Partners Midmarket and Apax Partners UK.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Apax Partners UK Ltd to pay the costs, including those necessarily incurred by Apax Partners Midmarket for the purposes of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Apax Partners UK Ltd to pay the costs, including those necessarily incurred by Apax Partners Midmarket for the purposes of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

---

(1)  OJ C 232, 27.6.2016.

1

---
No. 59467.

protests 170930-K, etc. (Seattle).

#### Border Brokerage Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordancé with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of beef similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Swift & Company et al.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 212, C. D. 1655), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
# C_2016078EN.01002901.xml

| 29.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 78/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 78/29

---

Action brought on 28 December 2015 — RP Technik v OHIM — Tecnomarmi (RP ROYAL PALLADIUM)

(Case T-768/15)

(2016/C 078/40)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: RP Technik GmbH Profilsysteme (Bönen, Germany) (represented by: P. Henrichs, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Tecnomarmi Snc (Treviso, Italy)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word elements ‘RP ROYAL PALLADIUM’ — Community trade mark application No 11 358 496

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before OHIM:

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 14 October 2014 in Case R 2061/2014-2

Contested decision:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order the intervener to pay the costs, including the costs incurred in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the intervener to pay the costs, including the costs incurred in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal;

| — | in the alternative, order the defendant to pay the costs, including the costs incurred in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal, if the intervener is not a party to the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, order the defendant to pay the costs, including the costs incurred in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal, if the intervener is not a party to the proceedings.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Annual Report of Watair. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending March 31, 2013, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Christopher Malone, Chief Financial
Officer of Vyre Network (formerly, Watair, Inc.), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                    
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                 | On behalf of: WATAIR, INC.                     
|---------------- | -----------------------------------------------
|January 26, 2024 | /s/ Christopher Malone                         
|                 | Chief Financial Officer, Vyre Network          
|                 | (Principal financial and accounting executive).
Before the Third Division,

October 1, 1947

No. 51924.

#### Stan Newcomb and Barbara Todd *v.*United States,

petition 6596-R (San Diego).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

The petition was dismissed.
Skip to Main Content

 

My TrainingMy ProfileCheckout

HomeContactHelp

      -  Enroll in Training 
      -  Host a Training 
      -  Find NHI Materials 
      -  Pay an Invoice 

browse courses

Browse Upcoming Sessions

# Course Search

                Search for courses based on delivery type, program area, or topic below, or find upcoming trainings in your state or territory.                 For more information on trainings from the National Highway Institute, contact us.             

              - SEARCH FOR                COURSES
              - SEARCH FOR                SCHEDULED SESSIONS
              - QUICK                SEARCH
              - DOWNLOAD                CATALOG
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 November 25, 2013

h1118

Order 

Clerk

November 25, 2013

147535

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 147535

COA: 311618

Berrien CC: 2011-001593-FH

GREG ALLEN BRENEMAN,

Defendant-Appellant.

____________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 5, 2013 order of 

the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that 

the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
# C_2016462EN.01002201.xml

| 12.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 462/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 462/22

---

Judgment of the General Court of 28 October 2016 — LA TARTE TROPÉZIENNE v EUIPO (LA TARTE TROPÉZIENNE 1955. SAINT-TROPEZ)

(Case T-7/16) (1)

1

((European Union trade mark - International registration designating the European Union - Figurative mark LA TARTE TROPÉZIENNE 1955. SAINT-TROPEZ - Absolute ground for refusal - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2016/C 462/27)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: LA TARTE TROPÉZIENNE (Cogolin, France) (represented by: T. Cuche, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: D. Hanf, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 26 October 2015 (Case R 720/2015-4) concerning the international registration designating the European Union of figurative mark LA TARTE TROPÉZIENNE 1955. SAINT-TROPEZ.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders LA TARTE TROPÉZIENNE to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders LA TARTE TROPÉZIENNE to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 90, 7.3.2016.

1

---
1 These depositions include, but are not necessarily limited to, Brandywine

Hospital, Grand View Hospital, Paoli Memorial Hospital, Crozer-Chester Medical

Center, Temple Hospital, Children’s Hospital of Pennsylvania, Phoenixville Hospital

and Riddle Memorial Hospital.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

CHESTER COUNTY HOSPITAL, : NO. 2:02-cv-02746-JRP

Plaintiff :

:

VS. :

:

INDEPENDENCE BLUE CROSS, et al., :

Defendants :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 13th day of November, 2003, it is hereby

ORDERED that, within ten (10) days of the date of this Order, the

parties shall produce to this Court a schedule for the third-party

hospital depositions.1

It is so ORDERED.

BY THE COURT:

 

CHARLES B. SMITH

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 163 Filed 11/13/2003 Page 1 of 1