alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

BRUCE MOYER : CIVIL ACTION

 

 vs. :

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, : NO. 04-CV-4998

Commissioner of the 

Social Security Administration

 ORDER

 AND NOW, this 13th day of September, 2005 upon

consideration of the Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment and

the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment, and after careful

review of the Report and Recommendation of United States

Magistrate Jacob P. Hart and Plaintiff’s objections thereto, it

is hereby ORDERED that:

 1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.

 2. The Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED.

 3. The Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.

 BY THE COURT:

 s/J. Curtis Joyner 

 J. CURTIS JOYNER, J.

Case 2:04-cv-04998-JCJ Document 18 Filed 09/14/05 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JOSEPHINE BALLIRO :

: CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-CV-4111

Plaintiff, :

:

v. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION;

BAYER AG;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE;

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM

:

:

:

:

:

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

:

Defendants. :

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of the Court:

Kindly enter the appearances of Hope S. Freiwald, Aline Fairweather, Erin

Brennan and Kirstin J. Miller as attorneys for defendant GlaxoSmithKline PLC.

Respectfully Submitted,

_____________________________ _____________________________

Hope S. Freiwald Aline Fairweather

_____________________________ _____________________________

Erin Brennan Kirstin J. Miller

DECHERT PRICE & RHOADS

4000 Bell Atlantic Tower

1717 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2793

(215) 994-4000

Case 2:02-cv-04111-CMR Document 7 Filed 09/11/2002 Page 1 of 1
Thompson, Sandra L.

Director, FHFA

Office of the Director

Nichols, Nina A.

Deputy Director, DAFS

Division of Accounting and Financial Standards

Cave, Jason C.

Deputy Director, DCOR

Division of Conservatorship Oversight and Readiness

Chew, Debra C.

Director, OEOF

Office of Equal Opportunity and Fairness

Jones III, Clinton C.

General Counsel, OGC

Office of General Counsel

Fichtler, Daniel S.

Senior Advisor (Capital Markets), OD

Office of the Director

Frumkin, Samuel

Executive Secretary, OD

Office of the Director

Brown, Annette

Administrative Specialist, OD

Office of the Director

Dickerson, Christopher H.

Principal Advisor, OD

Office of the Director

Williams, Marcus S.

Principal Advisor, OD

Office of the Director

Yi, Charles C.

Senior Advisor for Legal Affairs and Policy, OD

Office of the Director

Chang, Karen

Chief of Staff, OD

Office of the Director

Brooks, Dianne

Administrative Office Manager, OD

Office of the Director

Yi, Charles C.

Acting Director, OCAC

Office of Congressional Affairs and Communications

Jones, Katrina D.

Chief Operating Officer, OCOO

Office of the Chief Operating Officer

Stallings, Joshua R.

Deputy Director, DBR

Division of Federal Home Loan Bank Regulation

Tagoe, Naa Awaa

Deputy Director, DHMG

Division of Housing Mission and Goals

Bosland, Christopher L.

Acting Deputy Director, DER

Division of Enterprise Regulation

Coates, Daniel E.

Deputy Director, DRS

Division of Research and Statistics

Scalza, Louis M.

Acting Director, OMWI

Office of Minority and Women Inclusion
Case 2:04-cv-04063-RK Document 17 Filed 10/21/05 Page 1 of 1
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 20

- 40244 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES O F AMERICA ,
P laintiff

− Appell ee ,

v ersus BRUCE ALLEN RUTHERFORD, also known as Allen Bruce Rutherford , Defendant

− Appell ant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas No. 4:19

- CV

- 348 No. 4:17

- CR

- 41

- 1

Before SMITH, COSTA, and HO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: *

Bruce Rutherford, federal prisoner #27006

- 078, appeals the denial of

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR CUIT R ULE 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR CUIT R ULE 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED June 26, 2020 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 20-40244 Document: 00515468029 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/26/2020No. 20

- 40244

2 summary judgment and the denial of release on bail in a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 pro

ceeding challeng ing his conviction and sentence for possession of child pornog

raphy. He asserts several claims of ineffective counsel. He also moves for bail pending appeal and for leave to appeal in forma pauperis ( “ IFP ” ). Rutherford’s motion to appeal IFP is granted , b ut we dispose of the appeal without further briefing.

T he d enial of the motion for summary judgment is not a final appealable judgment under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. See Skelton v. Camp , 234 F.3d 292, 295 (5th Cir. 2000)

. No recognized exception to the final judgment rule applies here. Accordingly, the appeal is DISMI SSED in part for want of jurisdiction with regard to the denial of summary judgment

. Rutherford’s motion for release on bail pending appeal is DENIED because he fails to “raise[ ] substantial constitutional claims upon which he has a high probability of s uccess” and because he fails to allege or show that “extraordinary or exceptional circumstances exist which make the grant of bail necessary to make the habeas remedy effective.” Calley v. Callaway , 496 F.2d 701, 702 (5th Cir. 1974)

. For th e same reason s , t he denial of release on bail pending the disposition of the § 2255 motion is AFFIRMED

. See id. Case: 20-40244 Document: 00515468029 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/26/2020
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Drug Abuse Special Emphasis Panel; High Priority HIV and Substance Use Research.                    

*Date:*                         December 11, 2023.                    

*Time:*                         11:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute of Health, National Institute on Drug Abuse, 301 North Stonestreet Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Trinh T. Tran, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Office of Extramural Policy, National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH, 301 North Stonestreet Avenue, MSC 6021, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 827-5843,                         *trinh.tran@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.277, Drug Abuse Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, Scientist Development Awards, and Research Scientist Awards; 93.278, Drug Abuse National Research Service Awards for Research Training; 93.279, Drug Abuse and Addiction Research Programs, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: November 7, 2023.

David W. Freeman,

Supervisory Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-24970 Filed 11-9-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CRIMINAL ACTION NO. 04-532

:

v. :

:

SHAWN BROWN : CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-4183

ORDER

AND NOW, this 12th day of October, 2011, for the

reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby

ORDERED that:

(1) the motion of defendant Shawn Brown to vacate, set

aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is DENIED; 

(2) the motion of the government to dismiss the

petition of Brown under § 2255 is GRANTED; and

(3) no certificate of appealability is issued.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Harvey Bartle III 

J.

Case 2:04-cr-00532-HB Document 86 Filed 10/12/11 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 31  CERTIFICATION  I, Richard Jordan, certify that:  1.     I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Wataire International, Inc. for the year ended September 30, 2007;  2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.     The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to           materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and  5.   The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.  Date:  January 15, 2008   By: /s/  Richard Jordan ------------------------------- Richard Jordan, Chief Financial Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                        9
<MULTIPLIER>                                 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                      DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                         JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                           JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                     20,456
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                          0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>               783,684
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            0
<LOANS>                                 1,138,682
<ALLOWANCE>                                11,756
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                          2,003,341
<DEPOSITS>                              1,225,011
<SHORT-TERM>                              315,775
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                        19,870
<LONG-TERM>                               225,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                           0
<PREFERRED>                                     0
<COMMON>                                      431
<OTHER-SE>                                217,254
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>          2,003,341
<INTEREST-LOAN>                            39,676
<INTEREST-INVEST>                          27,344
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                           67,020
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                         23,273
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         37,572
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                      29,448
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                 786
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                            (97)
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                            12,584
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            17,517
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                 17,517
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                 0
<CHANGES>                                       0
<NET-INCOME>                               11,532
<EPS-BASIC>                                  0.33
<EPS-DILUTED>                                0.33
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                               3.05
<LOANS-NON>                                 2,523
<LOANS-PAST>                                  263
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                           11,004
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  34
<RECOVERIES>                                    0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                          11,756
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                       11,756
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                             0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                         0



</TABLE>
December 8, 2016

STATE OF MINNESOTA 

IN SUPREME COURT 

A16-1413 

In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against 

Dale Allen Hansen, a Minnesota Attorney, 

Registration No. 0217840. 

ORDER 

OmcEOF 

AJIPB.LA1ECcun 

The Director of the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility filed a petition 

for disciplinary action alleging that respondent Dale Allen Hansen committed professional 

misconduct warranting public discipline. Hansen misappropriated a client's funds; made 

false statements to the client and opposing counsel to conceal his misappropriation; made 

a false statement to a court through an associate and failed to correct that false statement; 

failed to communicate with a client; and knowingly issued trust account checks 

unsupported by sufficient funds. See Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 1.4(a)(3 ), 1.4( 4 ), 1.15(a), 

1.5(c)(4), 3.3(a)(l), 4.1, 8.4(a), 8.4(c), 8.4(d). Hansen failed to notify clients of a 

suspension; failed to file the required affidavit with the Director indicating he had provided 

notice of his suspension; and failed to seek timely withdrawal of representation of two 

clients in criminal matters and failed to take reasonably practicable steps to protect the 

interests of these clients upon his suspension. See Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 1.16( d), 3 .4( c), 

8.4(d); Rule 26(b), Rules on Lawyers Professional Responsibility (RLPR), Rule 26(e), 

RLPR. Hansen also failed to account to a client regarding a flat fee; failed to refund the 

unearned portions of the client's flat fee and another client's advance fee; and failed to 
respond to both clients' communications. See Minn. R. Prof. Conduct 1.4(a)(4). 1.5(b)(3), 

1.16(d). Moreover, Hansen failed to cooperate with the Director. See Minn. R. Prof. 

Conduct 8.l(b); Rule 25, RLPR. 

Hansen and the Director have entered into a stipulation for discipline. In it, Hansen 

unconditionally admits the allegations in the petition for disciplinary action and waives his 

procedural rights under Rule 14, RLPR. The parties jointly recommend that the appropriate 

discipline is disbarment. 

This court has independently reviewed the file and approves the jointly 

recommended disposition. 

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: 

1. Respondent Dale Allen Hansen is disbarred, effective as of the date of this 

order. 

2. Respondent shall comply with Rule 26, RLPR (requiring notice of 

disbarment to clients, opposing counsel, and tribunals). 

3. Respondent shall pay $900 in costs pursuant to Rule 24, RLPR. 

Dated: December 8, 2016 

2 

David R. Stras 

Associate Justice
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-30-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-02-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUL-01-2000
<CASH>                                             638
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      147
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     39,461
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                41,162
<PP&E>                                           8,985
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,731
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  47,366
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           25,356
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             7
<OTHER-SE>                                      20,411
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    47,366
<SALES>                                         44,273
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                44,273
<CGS>                                           29,635
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   29,635
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                11,913
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 423
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  2,272
<INCOME-TAX>                                       897
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              1,375
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,375
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0.2
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      0.2


</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 23-0129

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

LEVI JOSEPH LAVERGNE,

Defendant and Appellant.

ORDER

Upon consideration of Appellant’s motion to voluntarily dismiss 

appeal and good cause appearing, 

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant’s appeal in the above 

matter is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice.

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

July 23 2024

07/23/2024

Case Number: DA 23-0129
EXHIBIT 13.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Alto Palermo Sociedad Anónima (the company) for the year ended
June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Gabriel Blasi, as Chief Financial Officer of the company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|/s/    GABRIEL BLASI   
|By: Gabriel Blasi      
|Chief Financial Officer
|                       
|December 30, 2009      

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except as to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
No. 49082.

#### Protest 98374-K of Koons, Wilson & Co. (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

An examination of the entry papers revealed that the protest was not filed with the collector until 61 days after liquidation. In view of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930, it was held that the protest was untimely and it was therefore dismissed for want of jurisdiction.