alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
srpt-ex1061_755.htm



EXHIBIT 10.61

 



 

December 14, 2020

Ian Estepan 

Dear Ian,

On behalf of Sarepta’s entire management team, I would like to congratulate you on your promotion to EVP, Chief Financial Officer. Your new 2020 annual base salary will be $525,000, subject to applicable taxes and withholdings. Your new salary will be effective on December 14, 2020 and will be paid on a pro rata basis for 2020. It will be paid on a bi-weekly basis, starting with the next respective payroll.

You will continue to be eligible to participate in Sarepta’s annual bonus program. The target bonus opportunity for your new position is 50% of your base salary. For 2020, the bonus will be prorated as follows: the bonus for the first 11 months of 2020 will be calculated off your current annual base salary and a target bonus of 45% of your base salary, and the last month of 2020 will be calculated off your new annual base salary and a target bonus of 50% of your base salary. The actual amount of such bonus, if any, will be determined by Sarepta in its sole discretion, based on your performance and that of Sarepta against goals established by the Board. You must be employed through the date bonuses are disbursed to employees and have not given notice of intent to terminate in order to be eligible for the bonus. Additional details regarding Sarepta’s bonus program are available on the Nucleus.

You will also be granted an option to purchase 25,000 shares of Sarepta common stock pursuant to Sarepta’s 2018 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Option”). The Option will be granted on December 14, 2020 and its exercise price will equal the closing sales price of Sarepta’s common stock as reported by The NASDAQ Global Market on the date of grant.

The Option will vest as follows: Twenty-five percent of the shares of common stock underlying the Option will vest and become exercisable on the first anniversary of the date of grant, and 1/48th of the shares of common stock underlying the Option will vest and become exercisable on each monthly anniversary of such date of grant thereafter, such that the Option will be fully vested and exercisable on the fourth anniversary of such date of grant.

Thank you for your hard work and dedication to Sarepta. Together we will accomplish great things!

Best wishes,

 

 

/s/ Joan Nickerson
Joan Nickerson

SVP, Human Resources
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MARIA C., a minor, by and through her parent

and natural guardian, IRIS NEREIDA CAMACHO

02-cv-4336

District Court Docket Number

vs.

THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PHILADELPHIA

Notice of Appeal Filed 6/18/2004

Court Reporter(s)/ESR Operator(s)

Filing Fee:

 Notice of Appeal Paid X Not Paid Seaman

 Docket Fee Paid X Not Paid USA/VI

CJA Appointment (Attach Copy of Order)

 Private Attorney

 Defender Association or Federal Public Defender

 Motion Pending

Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis status, if applicable: (Attach copy of the Order)

 Motion Granted

 Motion Denied

 Motion pending before district judge

Certificate of probable cause (state habeas corpus): (Attach copy of the Order)

 Granted

 Denied

 Pending

 Defendant's Address (for criminal appeals)

 

 Prepared by : 

Deputy Clerk Signature/Date

PLEASE APPEND TO THE NOTICE OF APPEAL AND FORWARD TO

THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

notapp.frm

Case 2:02-cv-04336-JF Document 33 Filed 06/18/2004 Page 1 of 1
# C_2018328EN.01000201.xml

| 17.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 328/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 328/2

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 25 July 2018 — Orange Polska SA v European Commission, Polska Izba Informatyki i Telekomunikacji, European Competitive Telecommunications Association AISBL (ECTA), formerly the European Competitive Telecommunications Association

(Case C-123/16 P) (1)

((Appeal - Competition - Article 102 TFEU - Abuse of dominant position - Polish wholesale market for fixed broadband internet access - Refusal to give access to the network and to supply wholesale products - Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 - Article 7(1) - Article 23(2)(a) - Legitimate interest in finding an infringement which has come to an end - Calculation of the fine - 2006 Guidelines on the method of setting fines imposed pursuant to Article 23(2)(a) of Regulation No 1/2003 - Gravity - Mitigating circumstances - Investments made by the infringing undertaking - Review of legality - Review exercising powers of unlimited jurisdiction - Substitution of grounds))

(2018/C 328/02)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellants: Orange Polska SA (represented by: S. Hautbourg, avocat, P. Paśnik and M. Modzelewska de Raad, adwokaci, A. Howard, Barrister, and D. Beard QC,)

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: J. Szczodrowski, L. Malferrari and E. Gippini Fournier, acting as Agents), Polska Izba Informatyki i Telekomunikacji, (represented by P. Litwiński, adwokat), European Competitive Telecommunications Association AISBL (ECTA), formerly the European Competitive Telecommunications Association, (represented by G.I. Moir and J. MacKenzie, Solicitors)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Orange Polska SA to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Orange Polska SA to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;

| 3. | Orders Polska Izba Informatyki i Telekomunikacji and the European Competitive Telecommunications Association AISBL (ECTA) to bear their own costs |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Polska Izba Informatyki i Telekomunikacji and the European Competitive Telecommunications Association AISBL (ECTA) to bear their own costs

---

(1)  OJ C 191, 30.5.2016.

---
Exhibit 10.58
 Midwest Banc Holdings, Inc.
2008 Management Incentive Plan
Plan Summary
 Introduction:
  Purpose:
  Eligibility:
 Cash Based Incentives
 Long Term Stock Based Incentives
 Structure: (Attachment I)
 Executive Management
 Senior Management .
 General Management
 Administration




---



##### 



Midwest Banc Holdings, Inc.
2008 Management Incentive Plan
Plan Summary (contd)
 Performance Measurement Factors:
 Company Performance Goals
  Individual Performance Goals
   Ø
    
    Deposit growth
 Ø
    
    Commercial loan growth
 Ø
    
    Net charge offs
 Ø
    
    Fee income
 Ø
    
    Completion of fee income opportunity analysis by March 15, 2008.
 Ø
    
    Open the call center by 4/1/08
 Ø
    
    Improve credit quality measures to at least peer levels.
 Incentive Award Elements
 Base Award:
 Discretionary Awards:
  
    
    Participation on special projects or task forces outside of established goals
    
    Opening a new office or setting up a new operating entity under budget and/or ahead
of schedule.




---



##### 



Midwest Banc Holdings, Inc.
2008 Management Incentive Plan
Plan Summary (contd)
 Incentive Award Restrictions:
 
 Timing of Payouts
  Mid-Year Reviews
  Extraordinary Occurrences
    
    
    a sale of assets,
 
    
    unusual portfolio fluctuations,
 
    
    outsourcing,
 
    
    promotion or reassignment of duties.




---



##### 



Midwest Banc Holdings, Inc.
2008 Management Incentive Plan
Plan Summary (contd)
 Administration:
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of J. Crew Group, Inc. (the Company)
on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Millard Drexler, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and James Scully, Chief
Administrative Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of each of our knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: December 7, 2009



|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ MILLARD DREXLER                                     
|Millard Drexler                                         
|Chief Executive Officer                                 
|                                                        
|/s/ JAMES SCULLY                                        
|James Scully                                            
|Chief Administrative Officer and Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or
its staff upon request.
CH

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

No. DA 22-0030

STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,

v.

CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL WELCH,

Defendant and Appellant.

GRANT OF EXTENSION

Upon consideration of Appellee’s motion for a 30-day extension of time, 

and good cause appearing therefor, Appellee is granted an extension of time to

and including May 25, 2023, within which to prepare, file, and serve the State’s

response brief.

Electronically signed by:

Bowen Greenwood

Clerk of the Supreme Court

April 11 2023

04/11/2023

Case Number: DA 22-0030
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

KATHLEEN and DUANE STARMAN, :

: CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-CV-4261

Plaintiffs, :

:

v. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION;

BAYER AG;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE;

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM

:

:

:

:

:

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

:

Defendants. :

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of the Court:

Kindly enter the appearances of Hope S. Freiwald, Aline Fairweather, Erin

Brennan and Kirstin J. Miller as attorneys for defendant SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a

GlaxoSmithKline.

Respectfully Submitted,

_____________________________ _____________________________

Hope S. Freiwald Aline Fairweather

_____________________________ _____________________________

Erin Brennan Kirstin J. Miller

DECHERT PRICE & RHOADS

4000 Bell Atlantic Tower

1717 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2793

(215) 994-4000

Case 2:02-cv-04261-JP Document 8 Filed 10/04/2002 Page 1 of 1
# C_2018005EN.01001402.xml

| 8.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 5/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 5/14

---

Order of the Court (Third Chamber) of 26 October 2017 — (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nederlandstalige rechtbank van eerste aanleg Brussel — Belgium) — Criminal proceedings against Wamo BVBA, Luc Cecile Jozef Van Mol

(Case C-356/16) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Directive 2005/29/EC - Unfair commercial practices - National legislation prohibiting the advertising of procedures relating to plastic surgery or non-surgical plastic medicine))

(2018/C 005/19)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Nederlandstalige rechtbank van eerste aanleg Brussel

Parties in the criminal proceedings in the main proceedings

Parties in the criminal proceedings in the main proceedings

Wamo BVBA, Luc Cecile Jozef Van Mol

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market and amending Council Directive 84/450/EEC, Directives 97/7/EC, 98/27/EC and 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (‘the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive’) must be interpreted as not precluding a provision of national law, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which protects public health and the dignity and integrity of the professions of plastic surgeon and plastic doctor by prohibiting any natural or legal person from disseminating advertising for procedures relating to plastic surgery or non-surgical plastic medicine.

---

(1)  OJ C 335, 12.9.2016.

1

---
cS

DPS-293 June 30, 2005 Z
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
No. 05-2471

—

JERMEL SHULER

FILED

LOUIS FOLINO; ET. AL

(E.D. PA. 04-CV-04704) “t le MICHA Clerk

Dep. Clerk

Present: ROTH, BARRY and SMITH, CIRCUIT JUDGES By

Submitted is Appellant's request for a certificate of appealability under 28
U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)

in the above-captioned case.
Respectfully,
Clerk

MMW/RPC/cmd
ORDER

The foregoing application for a certificate of appealability is denied. Petitioner has
not demonstrated that jurists of reason would debate the correctness of the District
Court’s procedural ruling. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). Petitioner's
habeas petition was untimely filed after expiration of the one-year statute of limitations.
28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). Even if a petitioner’s actual innocence provides an exception to the
limitations period, Petitioner’s challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence does not assert
nor does it provide new evidence of his factual innocence. See Schlup v. Delo, 513 U.S.
298, 327-28 (1995); United States v. Ramos, 147 F.3d 281, 287 (3d Cir. 1998); Sweger
vy. Chesney, 294 F.3d 506, 523 (3d Cir. 2002).

By the Court,

/s Jane R. Roth

Circuit Judge
Dated: September 2, 2005
CRG/ce: Mr. Jermel Shuler é
Thomas W. Dolgenos, Esq. A True Cin. “ ws
Sek

Plareca In Walhror

Marcia M. Waldron, Clerk


OFFICE OF THE CLERK

MARCIA M. WALDRON Unitep States Court or AppPeALs

CLERK FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
21400 UNITED STATES COURTHOUSE,
601 MARKET STREET
PHILADELPHIA, PA 19106-1790

Eastern Clerk of District Court Date__ 9/2/05
(District)

In Re: Shuler v. Folino, et al. C.A. Nos._05-2471

(Caption)

Jermel Shuler

(Appellant)

Civil Nos. 04-cv-004704
(D.C. No.)

Enclosures:

TELEPHONE
215-597-2995

9/2/05 Certified copy of C. of A. Order by the Court/Clerk

(Date)
* X___ Record (Rec’d)
Supplemental Record (First)
* Exhibits

* State Court Record

X___ Copy of this form to acknowledge receipt and return to C. of A.

Record not returned at this time until appeal(s) closed at No.(s)

Please forward Record to this office.
The certified copy of order issued as the mandate on

Chanel R. Graham

is recalled.

(267)-299- 4955

Case Manager

Telephone Number

Ould Py Anal (267)-299-

Receipt Acknowledge: q \ \q

(Name)

(Date)

Record Vale Telephone Number \,

05

Rev. 4/3/03
Appeals (Record)
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF NATIONAL EQUIPMENT SERVICES, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001051381
<NAME> NATIONAL EQUIPMENT SERVICES, INC.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000 
       
<S>                               <C>                 <C> 
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     3-MOS               3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       Dec-31-1999          Dec-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                          Jan-01-1999          Jan-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                            Mar-31-1999          Mar-31-1998
<CASH>                                          500                  344
<SECURITIES>                                      0                    0
<RECEIVABLES>                                58,258               53,323
<ALLOWANCES>                                  2,848                2,590
<INVENTORY>                                  21,744               15,606
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  0                    0
<PP&E>                                      481,346              444,378
<DEPRECIATION>                               50,871               37,108
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              802,709              720,483
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             0                    0
<BONDS>                                     581,959              513,836
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                             0                    0
<PREFERRED>                                       0                    0
<COMMON>                                        241                  241
<OTHER-SE>                                  137,455              136,625
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                802,709              720,483
<SALES>                                      27,630                6,336
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             87,532               22,151
<CGS>                                        12,337                3,224
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                52,294               13,500
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             21,364                5,338
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                522                2,559
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           12,722                3,100
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               1,359                  290
<INCOME-TAX>                                    571                  151
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             788                  139
<DISCONTINUED>                                    0                    0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                   0                    0
<CHANGES>                                         0                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                    788                  139
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                  0.03                 0.01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                  0.03                 0.01
        


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1
                                  ------------


                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             -----------------------
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             -----------------------
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                             ----------------------
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                  ---------------------------------------------

         In connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Integrated
Healthcare Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended June 30, 2006,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.       the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act
                  of 1934; and

         2.       the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company at the dates and for the period
                  indicated.

         This Certificate has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with
the Securities and Exchange Commission.



Dated: August 18, 2006                            By: /s/ Bruce Mogel
                                                      -----------------------
                                                      Bruce Mogel
                                                      Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit
      32.2




In
      connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Alloy Steel International,
      Inc. (the “Company”) for the year ended September 30, 2007, as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Alan C.
      Winduss, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      1350, that:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date:
                January
                14, 2008
            By:
            /s/Alan WindussAlan C. WindussChief
                Financial Officer
# C_2018083EN.01000501.xml

| 5.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 83/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 83/5

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 17 January 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší správní soud — Czech Republic) — CORPORATE COMPANIES s.r.o. v Ministerstvo financí ČR

(Case C-676/16) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering and terrorist financing - Directive 2005/60/EC - Scope - Article 2(1), point 3(c) and Article 3, point 7(a) - Business activity of an undertaking consisting in the sale of companies already entered in the Register of Companies and formed solely for the purposes of sale - Sale by means of the transfer of the undertaking’s holding in the ready-made company))

(2018/C 083/06)

Language of the case: Czech

Referring court

Referring court

Nejvyšší správní soud

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: CORPORATE COMPANIES s.r.o.

Applicant:

Defendant: Ministerstvo financí ČR

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 2(1), point 3(c) of Directive 2005/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on the prevention of the use of the financial system for the purpose of money laundering and terrorist financing, read in conjunction with Article 3, point 7(a) of that directive, must be interpreted as meaning that a person, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, whose commercial activity consists in selling companies which it formed itself, without any prior request on the part of its potential clients, for the purposes of sale to those clients, by means of a transfer of its shares in the capital of the company being sold, falls within the scope of those provisions.

---

(1)  OJ C 86, 20.3.2017.

1

---
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT
      OF
      2002**





I,
      Daniel
      Vesco, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of Texhoma
      Energy, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the annual period ended September 30, 2007
      fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Form 10-KSB fairly
      presents in all material respects the financial condition and results of
      operations of Texhoma Energy, Inc.





By*:/s/
      Daniel Vesco*


Daniel
      Vesco


Chief
      Executive Officer and


Chief
      Financial Officer


(Principal
      Accounting Officer)




January
      15, 2008