alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### J.

consecutive sentences, and we decline Estes' invitation to compel such a requirement. See, e.g., Hughes v. State, 

### 116 Nev. 327, 333, 996 P.2d 890, 893 (2000) (noting that "this court has never required the district courts to utter 'talismanic' phrases" and instead "looks to the record as a whole to determine whether the sentencing court actually exercised its discretion"). We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion, Houk v. State, 

### 103 Nev. 659, 664, 747 P.2d 1376, 1379 (1987), and we

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.

J. Hardesty

Douglas

cc: Hon. Connie J. Steinheimer, District Judge Washoe County Public Defender Attorney General/Carson City Washoe County District Attorney Washoe District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA 

### 2

(0) 1947A
E

C

/R Incorporated Providing Environmental Technical Support Since 1989

501 Eastowne Drive, Suite 250  Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514

Telephone: (919)484-0222  Fax: (919) 484-0122

MEMORANDUM

Date: August 16, 2010

To: Bruce Moore, EPA/OAQPS/SPPD/CCG

From: Denise Grubert, EC/R Incorporated

Subject: Documentation of the Site Visit Report for EnCana Jonah Field Site

I. INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this memorandum is to document the Environmental Protection Agency 

(EPA) site visit to EnCana’s Jonah Field in Wyoming. 

II. LOCATION AND DATE

The Jonah Field site was located in the town of Pinedale, Wyoming. The site visit took 

place on August 6, 2010.

III. ATTENDEES

EnCana

Cindy Allen, Air Lead

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

Rachel Agnew

Jodi Howard

Bruce Moore

Greg Nizich

Nick Parsons

EC/R Incorporated

Heather Brown

Denise Grubert

Karen Marsh
Wyoming Department of Environment

Jennifer Frazier, Air Quality Division

Cynthia Madison, Air Quality Division

The site visit report for this facility contains confidential business information (CBI), and 

pending approval by the facility, a non-confidential report has not been issued.
# MTS Quick Link
No. 50339.

#### Protests 877081-G, etc., of J. H. Bleistein, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It was stipulated that the goatskins are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Winograd Bros.*(32 C. C. P. A. 153, C. A. D. 302), which record was admitted in evidence herein. In accordance therewith the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1177 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1177

To amend the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 to require the annual human 
 rights reports to include information on the institutionalization of 
children and the subjection of children to cruel, inhuman, or degrading 
  treatment, unnecessary detention, and denial of the right to life, 
                 liberty, and the security of persons.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 18, 2017

   Mr. Blunt introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
             referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 to require the annual human 
 rights reports to include information on the institutionalization of 
children and the subjection of children to cruel, inhuman, or degrading 
  treatment, unnecessary detention, and denial of the right to life, 
                 liberty, and the security of persons.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. INCLUSION IN ANNUAL COUNTRY REPORTS ON HUMAN RIGHTS 
              PRACTICES OF INFORMATION ON CHILDREN LIVING WITHOUT 
              FAMILIES.

    Section 116(d) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 
2151n(d)) is amended--
            (1) in paragraph (11)(C), by striking ``and'' at the end;
            (2) in paragraph (12)(C)(ii), by striking the period at the 
        end and inserting ``; and''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
            ``(13)(A) the institutionalization of children in 
        orphanages and large and small group homes, when such 
        institutionalization can be avoided by promptly--
                    ``(i) reunifying children with nurturing parents of 
                origin; or
                    ``(ii) placing them in adoptive homes in the 
                country of origin or abroad; and
            ``(B) the related subjection of children to--
                    ``(i) cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment;
                    ``(ii) unnecessary detention; or
                    ``(iii) the denial of the right to life, liberty, 
                and the security of persons.''.

SEC. 2. DELAYED EFFECTIVE DATE.

    This Act shall take effect on the date that is one year after the 
date of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2018427EN.01004301.xml

| 26.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 427/43 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 427/43

---

Judgment of the General Court of 4 October 2018 — Blackmore v EUIPO — Paice (DEEP PURPLE)

(Case T-345/16) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU word mark DEEP PURPLE - Earlier non-registered mark DEEP PURPLE - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(4) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) - Rules governing common-law action for passing-off - Goodwill - Breach of formal requirements - Article 177(1)(d) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court - Inadmissibility)

(2018/C 427/53)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Richard Hugh Blackmore (New York, New York, United States) (represented by: initially A. Edwards-Stuart, and subsequently T. Alkin, Barristers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: D. Gája and D. Walicka, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Ian Paice (London, United Kingdom) (represented by: M. Engelman, Barrister, and J. Stephenson, Solicitor)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 21 March 2016 (Case R 880/2015-5), relating to opposition proceedings between Mr Paice and Mr Blackmore.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Mr Richard Hugh Blackmore to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr Richard Hugh Blackmore to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 314, 29.8.2016.

---
Exhibit 32.1**CERTIFICATION**PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENT SET FORTH IN RULE 13A-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, ASAMENDED, AND SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE (18 U.S.C. SECTION1350), M. DALE SKEEN, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF TECHNOLOGY OFFICER OF VITRIA TECHNOLOGY,INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION (THE “COMPANY”) HEREBY CERTIFIES THAT, TO THE BEST OF HIS KNOWLEDGE,AS FOLLOWS:          The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006, to which thisCertification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “PERIODIC REPORT”), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that theinformation contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of this 9th day of August,2006.       /s/ M. Dale Skeen, Ph.D.    M. Dale Skeen, Ph.D.    Chief Executive Officer and Chief Technology Officer     A signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United StatesCode (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), has been provided to Vitria Technology, Inc. and will be retained byVitria Technology, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest. This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filingof Vitria Technology, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective ofany general incorporation language contained in such filing.
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Certification of Nevada ClassicThoroughbreds, Inc.pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002regarding Annual Report on Form 10-Kfor the year ended June 30, 2019**

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), theundersigned officer of Nevada Classic Thoroughbreds, Inc., a Nevada corporation(the "Company"), does hereby certify that, based upon his knowledge:

1. The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30,2019 (the "Form 10-K") fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. Information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

> 
Dated: October 13, 2019

By: /s/ Brad Brimhall 

 

________________________________________

 
Brad BrimhallPrincipal Executive OfficerChief Executive Officer
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

** **

I, James Leitzinger, certify that:

 

1.                                       Ihave reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Badger State Ethanol, LLC;

 

2.                                       Basedon my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

 

3.                                       Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects thefinancial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant asof, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

 

4.                                       Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) for the registrant and have:

 

a)                                      Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

 

b)                                     Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c)                                      Presentedin this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

 

5.                                       Theregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent function):

 

a)                                      Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

 

b)                                     Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

Date: February 24, 2005

 

 
|   | /s/ James Leitzinger     |
|--------|--------------------------|
|   | James  Leitzinger        |
|   | Chief  Financial Officer |

 

----
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

July 18, 2016

No. 04-15-00655-CR

Matthew Jamal JACKSON,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 379th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2014CR0148

Honorable Ron Rangel, Judge Presiding

ORDER

Sitting: Sandee Bryan Marion, Chief Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena O. Chapa, Justice

Jason Pulliam, Justice

The Court has considered the Appellant’s Motion for Rehearing En Banc, and the motion 

is DENIED.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 18th day of July, 2016.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
Exhibit 31.1

         Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

I, David S. Ahl, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of Sunshine PCS
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

      (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

      (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

      (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

      (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

      (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date:  April 9, 2008


/s/ David S. Ahl
----------------
David S. Ahl
Chief Executive Officer
November 10, 2015 

Dear Mr. Stuart: 

This letter is to inform you that the following information is missing from your petition (Docket 

No. FAA−2015−3549). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration 

(FAA) to process your petition. 

 Provide a copy of the Motion Picture and Television Operations Manual (MPTOM) 

which is required by Order 8900.1, Volume 3, Chapter 8, Section 1. If you wish for us to 

proceed without this manual and remove closed-set filming from your proposed operation 

please inform of us of your intention by the requested response date listed below. 

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at 

www.regulations.gov. Once your information has been submitted, please also send a copy of the 

requested information (and any proprietary information), as well as your comment tracking 

number from regulations.gov via e-mail to 333exemptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process 

your request any further, we must receive the information described above by 11/24/15. If we do 

not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-2999. 

Sincerely, 

/S/ 

Brenda Robeson 

Program Analyst
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CRIMINAL ACTION 

 :

 v. :

 :

FERNANDO PEÑA : NO. 03-487-09

ORDER

AND NOW, this 23rd day of January 2012, upon consideration of Defendant Fernando

Peña’s “Motion for Reduction of Sentence Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)” (Docket No. 638),

and all documents filed in connection therewith, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying

Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion is DENIED. 

BY THE COURT:

/s/ John R. Padova, J. 

______________________

John R. Padova, J.

Case 2:03-cr-00487-JP Document 655 Filed 01/23/12 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

: CIVIL ACTION NOS.

:

SEAGO : 02-3873

STANSBERRY : 02-3902

KRUSE : 02-3949

SIGWARTH : 02-3973

POST : 02-4168

BARBER, et al. : 02-4220

BRUNDLE, et al. : 02-4229

PINEDO, et al. : 02-4273

PLAEHN : 02-4324

:

VS. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION, et al. :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of July, 2002, the Court having been previously

advised that the above action cannot proceed to trial and disposition because of the following

reason:

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending disposition of a related

action.

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending determination of

arbitration proceedings.

[ ] - Interlocutory appeal filed.

[ X ] - Other: Case is placed into suspense pending receipt of the Case

Transfer Order from the Judicial Panel on Multi District Litigation

transferring case to District of Minnesota..

It is

ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this action closed for statistical purposes and

place the matter in the Civil Suspense File, and it is

Case 2:02-cv-04168-JF Document 2 Filed 07/11/2002 Page 1 of 2
FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction; and that the case be

restored to the trial docket when the action is in a status so that it may proceed to final

disposition; this order shall not prejudice the rights of the parties to this litigation.

BY THE COURT:

________________________________________

John P. Fullam, Judge

Case 2:02-cv-04168-JF Document 2 Filed 07/11/2002 Page 2 of 2
Part C and Combined Ash Silos Aldridge, Elizabeth

to: Ronald Jordan
02/03/2010 10:59 AM
Cc: "Hill, Donna B."
Show Details

History: This message has been forwarded. Hi Ron, You asked about th e section of the UWAG ICR comments which noted that Part C is not well laid out for a facility that handles both bottom as h and fly ash dry, but combines it in a common silo

p rior to beneficial reuse. Our member Integrys supplied that comment, based on its Westwood facility. Westwood is a circulating fluidized bed (CFB) boiler plant that burns waste coal. It collects both bottom ash and fly ash in a combined silo prior to sending the ash to abandoned mines for beneficial
reuse. There are several other facilities in Pe nnsylvania that employ the same technology and dispose of their ash in abandoned mines, but we haven't been able to confirm whether they have combined ash silos. We think it is likely that there are other co mbined ash silos in operatio n, however. According to the Coal Ash Association website, over 10,400,000 tons of ash was disposed of in mining applications in 2008 and about 8,600,000 of those tons were CFB ash. I can arrange a conf erence call with Mark Metcalf of Integrys if that would be helpful to you. Just let me know what you'd like to do. Thanks.

Liz Aldridge

H

unton & Williams (804) 788-8549 ealdridge@hunton.com Page 1 of 1

2/25/2010 file://C:\Documents and Settin g s\r j ordan\Local Settin g s\Tem p \notesFCBCEE\~web2671.h

...
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1149 

To amend the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act to repeal a provision 

limiting the export of timber harvested from land conveyed to the Kake 

Tribal Corporation under that Act. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 17, 2017 

Ms. MURKOWSKI introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 

referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To amend the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act to repeal 

a provision limiting the export of timber harvested from 

land conveyed to the Kake Tribal Corporation under 

that Act. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. REPEAL OF PROVISION LIMITING THE EXPORT 

4 OF TIMBER HARVESTED FROM CERTAIN 

5 KAKE TRIBAL CORPORATION LAND. 

6 Section 42 of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement 

7 Act (43 U.S.C. 1629h) is amended— 

8 (1) by striking subsection (h); 

2 

•S 1149 IS

1 (2) by redesignating subsection (i) as subsection 

2 (h); and 

3 (3) in subsection (h) (as so redesignated), in 

4 the first sentence, by striking ‘‘and to provide’’ and 

5 all that follows through ‘‘subsection (h)’’. 

Æ
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Virage Logic Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Adam
Kablanian, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

    (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Adam A. Kablanian

Adam A. Kablanian
President and Chief Executive Officer
May 14, 2004