##### Index to Financial Statements





UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549





FORM 10-K





(Mark one)



| | x | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
| | - | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009

or



| |  ̈ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For the transition period from
 to

Commission file number 0-49633





WELLS REAL ESTATE
FUND XIII, L.P.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)







|                                                               |  |                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------
|Georgia                                                        |  | 58-2438244                          
|(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |  | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|                                                               | 
|6200 The Corners Parkway, Norcross, Georgia                    |  | 30092-3365                          
|(Address of principal executive offices)                       |  | (Zip Code)                          
|                                                               | 
|Registrants telephone number including area code              |  | (770) 449-7800                      

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:



|                    |  |                                          
|------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------
|Title of each class |  | Name of each exchange on which registered
|None                |  | None                                     

Securities
registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act:



|                     |  |                    
|-------------------- |  | -------------------
|CASH PREFERRED UNITS |  | TAX PREFERRED UNITS
|(Title of class)     |  | (Title of class)   

Indicate by check mark if
the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes   ̈    No  x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to
Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.    Yes   ̈    No  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No   ̈

Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter)
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). [Not yet applicable to registrant.]    Yes   ̈    No   ̈

Indicate
by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated
by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.   ̈

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Large accelerated filer   ̈                Accelerated filer   ̈

Non-accelerated filer  x (Do not check if a smaller reporting
company)                Smaller reporting company   ̈

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes   ̈    No  x









---

##### Index to Financial Statements

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements contained in this Form 10-K of Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P. (the Partnership or the Registrant) other than
historical facts may be considered forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Such statements include, in particular, statements about
our plans, strategies, and prospects and are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, as well as known and unknown risks, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected or anticipated. Therefore, such statements are
not intended to be a guarantee of our performance in future periods. Such forward-looking statements can generally be identified by our use of forward-looking terminology such as may, will, expect,
intend, anticipate, estimate, believe, continue, or other similar words. Specifically, we consider, among others, statements concerning future operating results and cash flows, our ability
to meet future obligations, and the amount and timing of any future distributions to limited partners to be forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the
date this report is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We make no representations or warranties (express or implied) about the accuracy of any such forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-K, and we do not intend to
publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.

Any such
forward-looking statements are subject to unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors and are based on a number of assumptions involving judgments with respect to, among other things, future economic, competitive, and market conditions, all of
which are difficult or impossible to predict accurately. To the extent that our assumptions differ from actual results, our ability to meet such forward-looking statements, including our ability to generate positive cash flow from operations,
provide dividends to stockholders, and maintain the value of our real estate properties, may be significantly hindered. Contained in Item 1A. are some of the risks and uncertainties, although not all risks and uncertainties, which could cause
actual results to differ materially from those presented in our forward-looking statements.



Page 1



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND XIII, L.P.



PART I



|ITEM 1. | BUSINESS.
|------- | ---------

General

Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P. (the Partnership) is a Georgia public limited partnership with Leo F. Wells, III and Wells
Capital, Inc. (Wells Capital), a Georgia corporation, serving as its general partners (collectively, the General Partners). Wells Capital is a wholly owned subsidiary of Wells Real Estate Funds, Inc. (WREF). Leo
F. Wells, III is the president and sole director of Wells Capital and the president, sole director, and sole owner of WREF. The Partnership was formed on September 15, 1998, for the purpose of acquiring, developing, owning, operating,
improving, leasing, and managing income-producing commercial properties for investment purposes. Upon subscription for units, limited partners elected to have their units treated as Cash Preferred Units or Tax Preferred Units. Thereafter, limited
partners have the right to change their prior elections to have some or all of their units treated as Cash Preferred Units or Tax Preferred Units one time during each quarterly accounting period (conversion elections). Limited partners
may vote to, among other things: (a) amend the partnership agreement, subject to certain limitations; (b) change the business purpose or investment objectives of the Partnership; (c) add or remove a general partner; (d) elect a
new general partner; (e) dissolve the Partnership; and (f) approve a sale involving all or substantially all of the Partnerships assets, subject to certain limitations. The majority vote on any of the described matters will bind the
Partnership, without the concurrence of the General Partners. Each limited partnership unit has equal voting rights, regardless of which class of unit is selected.

On March 29, 2001, the Partnership commenced an offering of up to $45,000,000 of Cash Preferred or Tax Preferred limited partnership units ($10.00 per unit) pursuant to a Registration Statement filed
on Form S-11 under the Securities Act of 1933. The offering was terminated on March 28, 2003, at which time the Partnership had sold approximately 3,023,371 Cash Preferred Units and 748,678 Tax Preferred Units representing total limited partner
capital contributions of $37,720,487.

Operating Phases and Objectives

The Partnership typically operates in the following five life-cycle phases and, during which, typically focuses on the following key operating objectives. The duration of each phase is dependent upon
various economic, industry, market, and other internal/external factors. Some overlap naturally exists in the transition from one phase to the next.



| |  |  | Fundraising phase
| | - |  | -----------------

The period during which the Partnership is raising capital through the sale and issuance of limited partner units to the public;



| |  |  | Investing phase
| | - |  | ---------------

The period during which the Partnership invests the capital raised during the fundraising phase, less upfront fees, into the acquisition of real estate assets;



| |  |  | Holding phase
| | - |  | -------------

The period during which the Partnership owns and operates its real estate assets during the initial lease terms of the tenants;



| |  |  | Positioning-for-sale phase
| | - |  | --------------------------

The period during which the leases in place at the time of acquisition expire and, thus, the Partnership expends time, effort, and funds to re-lease such space to existing and/or new tenants. Following
the holding phase, the Partnership continues to own and operate the real estate assets, evaluate various options for disposition, and market the real estate assets for sale; and



Page 2



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

| |  |  | Disposition-and-liquidation phase
| | - |  | ---------------------------------

The period during which the Partnership sells its real estate investments, distributes net sale proceeds to the partners, liquidates, and terminates the Partnership.

We have transitioned from the holding phase into the positioning-for-sale phase of our life cycle. Accordingly, the Partnership is focusing on the remaining
assets, maintaining the current high occupancy level within the portfolio and concentrating on re-leasing and marketing efforts that we believe will ultimately result in the best disposition pricing for our investors.

Employees

The Partnership has no direct
employees. The employees of Wells Capital and Wells Management Company, Inc. (Wells Management), an affiliate of the General Partners, perform a full range of real estate and administrative services for the Partnership including leasing
and property management, accounting, asset management, and investor relations. See Item 13, Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, for a summary of the fees paid to the General Partners or their affiliates during the years
ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007.

Insurance

Wells Management carries comprehensive liability and extended coverage with respect to the properties we own through our investments in the joint ventures described in Item 2. In the opinion of
management, our properties are adequately insured.

Competition

We will experience competition for tenants from owners and managers of competing projects which may include the General Partners or their affiliates. As a result, in connection with negotiating leases, we
may offer rental concessions, reduced charges for tenant improvements, and other inducements, all of which may have an adverse impact on results of operations. We are also in competition with sellers of similar properties to locate suitable
purchasers for its properties.

Economic Dependency

We have engaged Wells Capital and Wells Management to provide certain essential services, including supervision of the management and leasing of its properties, asset acquisition and disposition services,
as well as other administrative responsibilities, including accounting services and investor communications and relations. These agreements are terminable by either party upon 60 days written notice. As a result of these relationships, we are
dependent upon Wells Capital and Wells Management.

Wells Capital and Wells Management are all owned and controlled by WREF. The operations of
Wells Capital and Wells Management represent substantially all of the business of WREF. Accordingly, we focus on the financial condition of WREF when assessing the financial condition of Wells Capital and Wells Management. In the event that WREF
were to become unable to meet its obligations as they become due, we might be required to find alternative service providers.

Future net
income generated by WREF will be largely dependent upon the amount of fees earned by Wells Capital and Wells Management based on, among other things, the level of investor proceeds raised from the sale of common stock for certain WREF-sponsored
programs and the volume of future acquisitions and dispositions of real estate assets by WREF-sponsored programs, as well as anticipated dividend income earned from its holdings of common stock of Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc. (Piedmont
REIT), which was acquired in connection with the Piedmont REIT internalization transaction (see Assertion of Legal Action



Page 3



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

Against Related- Parties below). The General Partners believe that WREF generates adequate cash flow from operations and has adequate liquidity available in the form of cash on hand and
other investments necessary to meet its current and future obligations as they become due.

We are also dependent upon the ability of our
current tenants to pay their contractual rent amounts as they become due. The inability of a tenant to pay future rental amounts would be likely to have a negative impact on our results of operations. We are not currently aware of any reason why our
existing tenants will not be able to pay their contractual rental amounts as they become due in all material respects. Situations preventing the tenants from paying contractual rents could result in a material adverse impact on our results of
operations.

Assertion of Legal Action Against Related-Parties

On March 12, 2007, a stockholder of Piedmont REIT, filed a putative class action and derivative complaint, presently styled In re Wells Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. Securities
Litigation, in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland against, among others, Piedmont REIT; Leo F. Wells, III and Wells Capital, the Partnerships General Partners; Wells Management, the Partnerships
property manager; certain affiliates of WREF; the directors of Piedmont REIT; and certain individuals who formerly served as officers or directors of Piedmont REIT prior to the closing of the internalization transaction on April 16, 2007. The
complaint alleged, among other things, violations of the federal proxy rules and breaches of fiduciary duty arising from the Piedmont REIT internalization transaction and the related proxy statement filed with the SEC on February 26, 2007, as
amended. The complaint sought, among other things, unspecified monetary damages and nullification of the Piedmont REIT internalization transaction. On April 9, 2007, the District Court denied the plaintiffs motion for an order enjoining
the internalization transaction. On April 17, 2007, the Court granted the defendants motion to transfer venue to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, and the case was docketed in the Northern District of
Georgia on April 24, 2007. On June 7, 2007, the Court granted a motion to designate the class lead plaintiff and class co-lead counsel. On June 27, 2007, the plaintiff filed an amended complaint, which attempted to assert class action
claims on behalf of those persons who received and were entitled to vote on the Piedmont REIT proxy statement filed with the SEC on February 26, 2007, and derivative claims on behalf of Piedmont REIT. On July 9, 2007, the Court denied the
plaintiffs motion for expedited discovery related to an anticipated motion for a preliminary injunction. On August 13, 2007, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint. On March 31, 2008, the Court granted in part
the defendants motion to dismiss the amended complaint. The Court dismissed five of the seven counts of the amended complaint in their entirety. The Court dismissed the remaining two counts with the exception of allegations regarding the
failure to disclose in the Piedmont REIT proxy statement details of certain expressions of interest in acquiring Piedmont REIT. On April 21, 2008, the plaintiff filed a second amended complaint, which alleges violations of the federal proxy
rules based upon allegations that the proxy statement to obtain approval for the Piedmont REIT internalization transaction omitted details of certain expressions of interest in acquiring Piedmont REIT. The second amended complaint seeks, among other
things, unspecified monetary damages, to nullify and rescind the internalization transaction, and to cancel and rescind any stock issued to the defendants as consideration for the internalization transaction. On May 12, 2008, the defendants
answered and raised certain defenses to the second amended complaint. On June 23, 2008, the plaintiff filed a motion for class certification. On September 16, 2009, the Court granted the plaintiffs motion for class certification. On
September 20, 2009, the defendants filed a petition for permission to appeal immediately the Courts order granting the motion for class certification with the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals. The petition for permission to appeal was
denied on October 30, 2009. On April 13, 2009, the plaintiff moved for leave to amend the second amended complaint to add additional defendants. The Court denied the plaintiffs motion for leave to amend on June 23, 2009. On
December 4, 2009, the parties filed motions for summary judgment. The parties filed their responses to the motions for summary judgment on January 29, 2010. The parties respective replies to the motions for summary judgment were
filed on February 19, 2010. The motions for summary judgment are currently pending before the court. Mr. Wells, Wells Capital, and Wells Management believe that the allegations contained in the complaint are without merit and intend to
vigorously defend this action. Any financial loss incurred by Wells Capital, Wells Management, or their affiliates could hinder their ability to successfully manage our operations and our portfolio of investments.



Page 4



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

Web Site Address

Access to copies of each of our filings with the SEC is available, free of charge, at the http://www.wellsref.comWeb site, through a link to the http://www.sec.gov Web site.



|ITEM 1A. | RISK FACTORS.
|-------- | -------------

Risk Related to Current
Economic Conditions

Current economic conditions and turmoil in the credit markets have caused, and will likely continue to cause,
market rental rates and property values to decline, may impede disposition of our properties at commercially reasonable terms, and have had, and will likely continue to have, an adverse effect on our financial condition.

Current economic conditions, the availability and cost of credit, the mortgage market, and declining real estate markets have contributed to increased
volatility, lower real estate values, and diminished expectations for real estate markets and the economy as a whole. As a result, current economic conditions and the credit crisis have caused commercial real estate values and market rental rates to
decline significantly and will likely continue to put downward pressure on these values and market rental rates. Our estimated unit valuations as of December 31, 2009 have declined from their prior year levels and are expected to continue to
decline in the upcoming year. Deteriorating economic conditions could adversely impact the ability of one or more of our tenants to honor their lease payments and our ability to re-lease space on favorable terms as leases expire or as space
otherwise becomes vacant at our properties. While we do not anticipate the need to access the credit markets, the impact of the current crisis in the credit markets may adversely affect the ability of potential purchasers of our properties to obtain
financing. Therefore, this may affect our timing and/or ability to sell our properties at commercially reasonable terms. The current economic conditions and the difficulties currently being experienced in the mortgage and real estate markets have
adversely affected our business model, financial condition, results of operations, and the valuation of our units. We do not expect that the difficult conditions in the mortgage and real estate markets are likely to improve in the near future. A
worsening of these conditions would exacerbate the adverse effects that the current market environment has had on us and on commercial real estate in general.

Real Estate Risks

Changes in general economic conditions and regulatory matters germane
to the real estate industry may cause our operating results to suffer and the value of our real estate properties to decline.

Our
operating results will be subject to risks generally incident to the ownership of real estate, including:



| |  |  | changes in general or local economic conditions;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | changes in supply of or demand for similar or competing properties in an area;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | changes in interest rates and availability of permanent mortgage funds, which may render the sale of a property difficult or unattractive;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | changes in tax, real estate, environmental, and zoning laws; and
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | periods of high interest rates and tight money supply.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------

These and other reasons may prevent us from being profitable or from realizing growth or maintaining the value of our real estate properties.

General economic conditions may affect the timing of sale of our properties and the sale price we receive.

We may be unable to sell a property if or when we decide to do so. The real estate market is affected by many factors, such as general economic conditions, the availability of financing, interest rates,
and other factors, including supply and demand for real estate investments, all of which are beyond our control. We cannot predict



Page 5



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

whether we will be able to sell any property for the price or on terms which are acceptable to us. Further, we cannot predict the length of time which will be needed to find a willing purchaser
and to close the sale of a property.

Near-term tenant rollover at one of our properties could reduce or eliminate future cash
distributions to limited partners.

We anticipate that we will be required to expend in the future, substantial funds for tenant
improvements and other costs necessary to re-lease the AIU  Chicago Building, which is currently 83% leased through December 2010. If the majority tenant of the AIU  Chicago Building does not extend its current lease and we are unable to
secure replacement tenants in a timely manner, property earnings would suffer and we would be required to reserve cash otherwise available for operating distributions to limited partners. In addition, the residual value of this property would be
negatively impacted by vacancy because the market value is largely dependent upon the value of the leases in place at such property.

Adverse economic conditions in the geographic regions in which we own properties may negatively impact your overall returns.

Adverse economic conditions in the geographic regions in which we own our properties could affect the real estate values in this area or the business of our tenants if any of our tenants rely upon the local economy for their revenues.
Therefore, changes in local economic conditions could reduce our income and distributions to limited partners or the amounts we could otherwise receive upon the sale of a property in a negatively affected region.

Adverse economic conditions affecting the particular industries of the tenants of our properties may negatively impact your overall returns.

Adverse economic conditions affecting a particular industry of one or more of our tenants could affect the financial ability of one or
more of our tenants to make payments under their leases, which could cause delays in our receipt of rental revenues or a vacancy in one or more of our properties for a period of time. Therefore, changes in economic conditions of the particular
industry of one or more of our tenants could reduce our income and distributions to limited partners and the value of one or more of our properties at the time of sale of such properties.

We are dependent on our tenants for substantially all of our revenue, so our success is materially dependent on the financial stability of our tenants.

Most of our properties are occupied by a single tenant or only a few tenants and, therefore, the success of our investments is materially
dependent on the financial stability of our tenants. Lease payment defaults by tenants could cause us to reduce the amount of distributions to holders of Cash Preferred Units. A default of a tenant on its lease payments to us would cause us to lose
the revenue from the property. In the event of a default, we may experience delays in enforcing our rights as landlord and may incur substantial costs in protecting our investment and re-letting our property. If a lease is terminated, we cannot
assure you that we will be able to lease the property for the rent previously received or sell the property without incurring a loss.

Your
investment in units is subject to greater risk because we lack a diversified property portfolio.

Because we own interests in only a
limited number of properties, your investment in units is subject to a greater risk of loss. There is a greater risk that you will lose money in your investment because our portfolio of properties is not diverse by geographic location, property
type, or industry group of tenants.



Page 6



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

Our future financial success depends on only a few tenants.

The ability of our tenants to generate revenues is substantially dependent upon their financial condition and, accordingly, any event of bankruptcy,
insolvency, or a general downturn in the business of any of these tenants may result in the failure or delay of such tenants rental payments, which may have a substantial adverse effect on our financial performance.

We depend on tenants for our revenue. Accordingly, lease terminations and/or tenant default could reduce our net income and limit our ability to make
distributions to our limited partners.

The success of our investments materially depends on the financial stability of our tenants. A
default or termination by a significant tenant on its lease payments to us would cause us to lose the revenue associated with such lease and require us to find an alternative source of revenue. In the event of a tenant default or bankruptcy, we may
experience delays in enforcing our rights as landlord and may incur substantial costs in protecting our investment and re-letting our property. If significant leases are terminated or defaulted upon, we may be unable to lease the property for the
rent previously received or sell the property without incurring a loss. These events could cause us to reduce the amount of distributions to limited partners.

If one or more of our tenants file for bankruptcy, we may be precluded from collecting all sums due.

If one or more of our tenants, or the guarantor of a tenants lease, commences, or has commenced against it, any proceeding under any provision of the federal Bankruptcy Code, as amended, or any
other legal or equitable proceeding under any bankruptcy, insolvency, rehabilitation, receivership, or debtors relief statute or law (bankruptcy proceeding), we may be unable to collect sums due under relevant leases. Any or all of the
tenants, or a guarantor of a tenants lease obligations, could be subject to a bankruptcy proceeding. Such a bankruptcy proceeding may bar our efforts to collect pre-bankruptcy debts from these entities or their properties, unless we are able
to obtain an enabling order from the bankruptcy court. If a lease is rejected by a tenant in bankruptcy, we would only have a general unsecured claim against the tenant, and may not be entitled to any further payments under the lease. A
tenants or lease guarantors bankruptcy proceeding could hinder or delay efforts to collect past-due balances under relevant leases, and could ultimately preclude collection of these sums. Such an event could cause a decrease or cessation
of rental payments, which would result in a reduction in our cash flow and the amount available for distribution to limited partners holding Cash Preferred Units. In the event of a bankruptcy proceeding, we cannot assure you that the tenant or its
trustee will assume our lease. If a given lease, or guaranty of a lease, is not assumed, our cash flow and the amounts available for distribution to limited partners holding Cash Preferred Units may be adversely affected.

We may not have funding for future tenant improvements, which may reduce your returns and make it difficult to attract one or more new tenants.

When a tenant at one of our properties does not renew its lease or otherwise vacates its space in one of our buildings, it is likely that
in order to attract one or more new tenants, we will be required to expend substantial funds for tenant improvements and tenant refurbishments to the vacated space and other lease-up costs. Substantially all of our net offering proceeds available
for investment have been used for investment in Partnership properties, and we do not anticipate that we will maintain permanent working capital reserves. We also have not identified a funding source to provide funds which may be required in the
future for tenant improvements, tenant refurbishments, and other lease-up costs in order to attract new tenants. We cannot assure you that any such source of funding will be available to us for such purposes in the future. In the event that we are
required to use net cash from operations to fund such tenant improvements, tenant refurbishments, and other lease-up costs, cash distributions to limited partners holding Cash Preferred Units will be reduced or eliminated for potentially extended
periods of time.



Page 7



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

A property that incurs a vacancy could be difficult to sell or lease.

A property may incur a vacancy either by the continued default of a tenant under its lease or the expiration of one of our leases. Our properties may be
leased to a single tenant and/or may be specifically suited to the particular needs of a certain tenant based on the type of business the tenant operates. If a vacancy on any of our properties continues for a long period of time, we may suffer
reduced revenues resulting in less cash to be distributed to investors holding Cash Preferred Units. In addition, the resale value of the property could be diminished because the market value of a particular property will depend principally upon the
value of the leases of such property.

Uninsured losses relating to real property or excessively expensive premiums for insurance coverage
could reduce our net income.

Our General Partners will attempt to obtain adequate insurance on all of our properties to cover casualty
losses. However, there are types of losses, generally catastrophic in nature, such as losses due to wars, acts of terrorism, earthquakes, floods, hurricanes, pollution, or environmental matters that are uninsurable or not economically insurable, or
may be insured subject to limitations, such as large deductibles or co-payments. Insurance risks associated with potential terrorism acts could sharply increase the premiums we pay for coverage against property and casualty claims. We may not have
adequate coverage for such losses. If any of our properties incur a casualty loss that is not fully insured, the value of our assets will be reduced by such uninsured loss. In addition, other than reserves of net cash from operations we may
establish, we have no source of funding to repair or reconstruct any uninsured damaged property. Also, to the extent we must pay unexpectedly large amounts for insurance, we could suffer reduced earnings that would result in lower distributions to
limited partners.

Uncertain market conditions and the broad discretion of our General Partners relating to the future disposition of
properties could adversely affect the return on your investment.

We generally will hold the various remaining real properties in which we
are invested until such time as the General Partners determine that the sale or other disposition thereof appears to be advantageous to achieve our investment objectives or until the sale of the properties is warranted even if it appears that such
objectives will not be met. Our General Partners intend to sell properties acquired for development after holding such properties for a period of 10 years from the date the development is completed, and intend to sell existing income-producing
properties within 10 to 12 years after their acquisition, or as soon thereafter as market conditions permit. This is the period of time it typically takes to realize significant appreciation of the type of property in which we traditionally invest.
However, our General Partners may exercise their discretion as to whether and when to sell a property, and we will have no obligation to sell properties at any particular time, except upon the termination of the Partnership as specified in the
partnership agreement, or earlier if a majority of you vote to liquidate the Partnership pursuant to a formal proxy to liquidate. We cannot predict with any certainty the various market conditions affecting real estate investments which will exist
at any particular time in the future. Due to the uncertainty of market conditions which may affect the future disposition of our properties, we cannot assure you that we will be able to sell our properties at a profit in the future. Accordingly, the
timing of liquidation of the Partnership and the extent to which you will receive cash distributions and realize potential appreciation on our real estate investments will be dependent upon fluctuating market conditions.

If any environmentally hazardous material is determined to exist on a property owned by the Partnership, our operating results could be adversely
affected.

Under various federal, state, and local environmental laws, ordinances, and regulations, a current or previous owner or operator
of real property may be liable for the cost of removal or remediation of hazardous or toxic substances on, under or in such property. Such laws often impose liability whether or not the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence
of such hazardous or toxic substances. Environmental laws also may impose restrictions on the manner in which property may be used or businesses may be operated, and these



Page 8



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

restrictions may require expenditures. Environmental laws provide for sanctions in the event of noncompliance and may be enforced by governmental agencies or, in certain circumstances, by private
parties. In connection with the acquisition and ownership of our properties, we may be potentially liable for such costs. The cost of defending against claims of liability, complying with environmental regulatory requirements, or remediating any
contaminated property could materially adversely affect the business, assets, or results of operations of the Partnership and, consequently, amounts available for distribution to limited partners holding Cash Preferred Units.

The Partnership and/or other prior Wells public limited partnerships sponsored by our General Partners have sold real estate properties for a sale price
less than the original purchase price.

Certain of the real estate properties previously purchased by the Partnership and other Wells
public limited partnerships sponsored by the General Partners have not appreciated to the levels anticipated at the time of purchase. Recently some of these properties have been sold by such partnerships at purchase prices below the prices paid for
such properties. We cannot guarantee that any of our properties will appreciate in value.

General Investment Risks

The Georgia Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act (GRULPA) does not grant you any specific voting rights, and your rights are limited under
our partnership agreement.

A vote of a majority in interest of the limited partners is sufficient to take the following significant
Partnership actions:



| |  |  | to amend our partnership agreement;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------



| |  |  | to change our business purpose or our investment objectives;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | to remove our General Partners; or
| | - |  | ----------------------------------



| |  |  | to authorize a merger or a consolidation of the Partnership.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------

These are your only significant voting rights granted under our partnership agreement. In addition, GRULPA does not grant you any specific voting rights. Therefore, your voting rights are severely
limited.

You are bound by the majority vote on matters on which you are entitled to vote.

Limited partners may approve any of the above actions by majority vote of the outstanding units. Therefore, you are bound by such majority vote even if you
do not vote with the majority on any of these actions.

Under our partnership agreement, we are required to indemnify our General Partners
under certain circumstances which may reduce returns to our limited partners.

Under our partnership agreement and subject to certain
limitations, the Partnership is required to indemnify our General Partners from and against losses, liabilities, and damages relating to or arising out of any action or inaction on behalf of the Partnership done in good faith and in the best
interest of the Partnership. If substantial and expensive litigation should ensue and the Partnership is obligated to indemnify one or both General Partners, we may be forced to use substantial funds to do so, which may reduce the return on your
investment.

Payment of fees to our General Partners or their affiliates will reduce cash available for distributions to our limited
partners.

Our General Partners or their affiliates perform services for us in connection with the management and leasing of our
properties. Our affiliates may receive property management, leasing and asset management fees of 4.5% of gross revenues in connection with the commercial properties we own. In addition, we will reimburse our General



Page 9



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

Partners or their affiliates for the administrative services necessary to our prudent operation, which includes actual costs of goods, services, and materials used for or by the Partnership.
These fees and reimbursements will reduce the amount of cash available for capital expenditures to our properties or distributions to our limited partners.

The availability and the timing of cash distributions are uncertain.

We cannot assure you
that sufficient cash will be available to make distributions to you from either net cash from operations or proceeds from the sale of properties. We bear all expenses incurred in connection with our operations, which are deducted from cash funds
generated by operations prior to computing the amount of net cash from operations to be distributed to our general and limited partners. In addition, our General Partners, in their discretion, may retain all or any portion of net cash generated from
our operations and/or proceeds from the sale of our properties for tenant improvements, tenant refurbishments, and other lease-up costs or for working capital reserves.

Gains and distributions upon sale of our properties are uncertain.

Although gains from the
sale of properties typically represent a substantial portion of any profits attributable to real estate investments, we cannot assure you that we will realize any gains on the sale of our properties. In any event, you should not expect distribution
of such proceeds to occur during the early years of our operations. We generally will not sell properties until at least 10 to 12 years after the acquisition of the properties, and our General Partners may exercise their discretion as to whether and
when to sell a property, therefore, we have no obligation to sell properties at any particular time. Further, receipt of the full proceeds of such sales may be extended over a substantial period of time following the sales. In addition, the amount
of taxable gain allocated to you with respect to the sale of a Partnership property could exceed the cash proceeds received from such sale. While proceeds from the sale of a property will generally be distributed to investors, the General Partners,
in their sole discretion, may not make such distribution if such proceeds are used to:



| |  |  | purchase land underlying any of our properties;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------



| |  |  | buy out the interest of any co-venturer or joint venture partner in a property which is jointly owned;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | establish working capital reserves; or
| | - |  | --------------------------------------



| |  |  | make repairs, maintenance, tenant improvements, capital improvements, or other expenditures to any of our existing properties.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We are uncertain of our sources for funding of future capital needs.

Substantially all of the gross proceeds of the offering were used to invest in properties and to pay various fees and expenses. In addition, we do not
anticipate that we will maintain any permanent working capital reserves. Accordingly, in the event that we develop a need for additional capital in the future, such as the funding of tenant improvements, tenant refurbishments or other lease-up
costs, we have not identified any sources for such funding, and we cannot assure you that any sources of funding will be available to us for potential capital needs in the future.

We may need to reserve net cash from operations for future tenant improvements, which may reduce your returns.

We may be required to expend substantial funds for tenant improvements and tenant refurbishments to vacated space and other lease-up costs. Substantially all of our net offering proceeds available for
investment were used for investment in Partnership properties, and we do not anticipate that we will maintain permanent working capital reserves. We also have no identified funding source to provide funds which may be required in the future for
tenant improvements, tenant refurbishments, and other lease-up costs in order to attract new tenants. We



Page 10



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

cannot assure you that any such source of funding will be available to us for such purposes in the future. In the event that we are required to use net cash from operations to fund such tenant
improvements, tenant refurbishments, and other lease-up costs, cash distributions to limited partners holding Cash Preferred Units will be reduced or eliminated for potentially extended periods of time.

Concentration of Credit Risk

The
Partnership maintains bank accounts with high-credit, quality financial institutions. At times, our cash balances may exceed the federally insured limits.

Marketability and Transferability Risks

There is no public trading market for your
units.

There is no public market for your units, and we do not anticipate that any public trading market for your units will ever develop.
If you attempt to sell your units, you would likely do so at substantially discounted prices on the secondary market. Further, our partnership agreement restricts our ability to participate in a public trading market or anything substantially
equivalent to one by providing that any transfer which may cause us to be classified as a publicly traded partnership as defined in Section 7704 of the Internal Revenue Code shall be deemed void and shall not be recognized. Because
classification of the Partnership as a publicly traded partnership may significantly decrease the value of your units, our General Partners intend to use their authority to the maximum extent possible to prohibit transfers of units which
could cause us to be classified as a publicly traded partnership.

Your units have limited transferability and lack liquidity
due to restrictions under state regulatory laws and our partnership agreement.

You are limited in your ability to transfer your units. Our
partnership agreement and certain state regulatory agencies have imposed restrictions relating to the number of units you may transfer. In addition, the suitability standards applied to you upon the purchase of your units may also be applied to
persons to whom you wish to transfer your units. Accordingly, you may find it difficult to sell your units for cash or if you are able to sell your units, you may have to sell your units at a substantial discount. You may not be able to sell your
units in the event of an emergency, and your units are not likely to be accepted as collateral for a loan.

Our estimated unit valuations
should not be viewed as an accurate reflection of the value of the limited partners units.

The estimated unit valuations contained
in this Annual Report on Form 10-K should not be viewed as an accurate reflection of the value of the limited partners units, what limited partners might be able to sell their units for, or the fair market value of the Partnerships
properties, nor do they necessarily represent the amount of net proceeds limited partners would receive if the Partnerships properties were sold and the proceeds distributed in a liquidation of the Partnership in accordance with the net sale
proceeds distribution allocation outlined in the partnership agreement. There is no established public trading market for the Partnerships limited partnership units, and it is not anticipated that a public trading market for the units will
ever develop. We did not obtain any third-party appraisals of our properties in connection with these estimated unit valuations. In addition, property values are subject to change and could decline in the future. The valuations performed by the
General Partners are estimates only, and are based on a number of assumptions which may not be accurate or complete and may or may not be applicable to any specific limited partnership units. Further, these estimated valuations are applicable only
to limited partners who purchased their units directly from the Partnership in the Partnerships original public offering of units. It also should be noted that, as properties are sold and the net proceeds from property sales are distributed to
limited partners, the remaining value of the Partnerships portfolio of properties, and resulting value of Partnerships limited partnership units, will naturally decline.



Page 11



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

Special Risks Regarding Status of Units

If you hold Cash Preferred Units, we expect that you will be allocated more income than cash flow.

Since limited partners holding Cash Preferred Units are allocated substantially all of the Partnerships net income, while substantially all deductions for depreciation and other tax losses are allocated to limited partners holding Tax
Preferred Units, we expect that those of you who hold Cash Preferred Units will be allocated taxable income in excess of your cash distributions. We cannot assure you that cash flow will be available for distribution in any year.

The desired effect of holding Cash Preferred Units or Tax Preferred Units may be reduced depending on how many investors hold each type of unit.

You will be entitled to different rights and priorities as to distributions of cash flow from operations and net sale proceeds and as to the
allocation of depreciation and other tax losses depending upon whether you are holding Cash Preferred Units or Tax Preferred Units. However, the effect of any advantage associated with holding Cash Preferred Units or Tax Preferred Units may be
significantly reduced or eliminated, depending upon the ratio of Cash Preferred Units to Tax Preferred Units during any given period. We will not attempt to restrict the ratio of Cash Preferred Units to Tax Preferred Units, and we will not attempt
to establish or maintain any particular ratio.

Management Risks

You must rely on our General Partners for management of our business.

Our General Partners
make all decisions with respect to the management of the Partnership. Limited partners have no right or power to take part in the management of the Partnership, except through the exercise of limited voting rights. Therefore, you must rely almost
entirely on our General Partners for management of the Partnership and the operation of its business. Our General Partners may be removed only under certain conditions set forth in our partnership agreement. If our General Partners are removed, they
will receive payment equal to the fair market value of their interests in the Partnership, as agreed upon by our General Partners and the Partnership or by arbitration if they are unable to agree.

Leo F. Wells, III has a primary role in determining what is in the best interest of the Partnership and its limited partners.

Leo F. Wells, III is one of our General Partners and is the president, treasurer, and sole director of Wells Capital, our other general partner. Therefore,
one person has a primary role in determining what is in the best interest of the Partnership and its limited partners. Although Mr. Wells relies on the input of the officers and other employees of Wells Capital, he ultimately has the authority
to make decisions affecting our Partnership operations. Therefore, Mr. Wells alone will determine the propriety of his own actions, which could result in a conflict of interest when he is faced with any significant decision relating to our
Partnership affairs.

Our loss of, or inability to obtain, key personnel could delay or hinder implementation of our investment strategies,
which could limit our ability to make distributions.

Our success depends to a significant degree upon the contributions of Leo F. Wells,
III, Douglas P. Williams, and Randall D. Fretz, each of whom would be difficult to replace. We do not have employment agreements with Messrs. Wells, Williams, or Fretz, and we cannot guarantee that such persons will remain affiliated with us.
If any of Wells Capitals key personnel were to cease their affiliation with the Partnership, we may be unable to find suitable replacement personnel, and our operating results could suffer. We do not maintain key person life insurance on any
person. We believe that our future success depends, in large part, upon the ability of our General Partners to hire and retain highly skilled managerial and operational personnel. If we lose, or are unable to obtain, the services of highly skilled
personnel or do not establish or maintain appropriate strategic relationships, our ability to implement our investment strategies could be delayed or hindered, and the value of your investment may decline.



Page 12



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

Our operating performance could suffer if Wells Capital incurs significant losses, including those losses
that may result from being the general partner of other entities.

We are dependent on Wells Capital to conduct our operations; thus,
adverse changes in the financial condition of Wells Capital, including changes arising from litigation or our relationship with Wells Capital, could hinder its ability to successfully manage our operations and our portfolio of investments. As a
general partner in many Wells-sponsored programs, Wells Capital may have contingent liabilities for the obligations of such programs. Enforcement of such obligations against Wells Capital could result in a substantial reduction of its net worth. If
such liabilities affected the level of services that Wells Capital could provide, our operations and financial performance could suffer.

Our General Partners have a limited net worth consisting of illiquid assets, which may affect their ability to fulfill their financial obligations to the Partnership.

The net worth of our General Partners consists primarily of interests in real estate, retirement plans, partnerships, and closely held businesses and, in the case of Wells Capital, receivables from
affiliated corporations and partnerships. Accordingly, the net worth of our General Partners is illiquid and not readily marketable. This illiquidity may be relevant to you in evaluating the ability of our General Partners to fulfill their financial
obligations to the Partnership. In addition, our General Partners have significant commitments to the other Wells-sponsored programs.

Increases in our general and administrative operating expenses, including increased expenses associated with operating as a public company in the current regulatory environment, could limit our ability to make distributions.

As we evolve through our Partnership life cycle and sell various properties in our portfolio, our general and administrative operating
expenses become a larger percentage in relationship to our operating cash flow and the value of our properties. Further, we bear all expenses incurred in connection with our operations, which are deducted from cash funds generated by operations
prior to computing the amount of net cash from operations to be distributed to our limited partners. Therefore, as a result of the increased general and administrative operating expenses and increased percentage of such expenses, we cannot assure
you that sufficient cash will be available to make future distributions to you from either net cash from our operations or proceeds from the sale of our properties.

Conflicts of Interest Risks

Our General Partners will face conflicts of interest
relating to time management, which could result in lower returns on our investments.

Because our General Partners and their affiliates
have interests in other real estate programs and also engage in other business activities, they could have conflicts of interest in allocating their time between our business and these other activities, which could affect operations of the
Partnership. You should note that our partnership agreement does not specify any minimum amount of time or level of attention that our General Partners are required to devote to the Partnership.

Our General Partners will face conflicts of interest relating to the sale and leasing of properties.

We may be selling properties at the same time as other Wells programs are buying and selling properties. We may have acquired or be selling properties in
geographic areas where other Wells programs own properties or are trying to sell properties, which could lower your return on your investment.



Page 13



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

Investments in joint ventures with affiliates and Piedmont Operating Partnership, LP will result in
additional risks involving our relationship with the co-venturer.

We have entered into joint ventures with affiliates and Piedmont
Operating Partnership, LP. In addition, Piedmont Operating Partnership, LP has a majority interest in the Wells Fund XIII-REIT Joint Venture Partnership and, as a result, holds the controlling vote on significant joint venture matters. Such
investments may involve risks not otherwise present with an investment in real estate, including, for example:



| |  |  | the possibility that our co-venturer, co-tenant, or partner in an investment might become bankrupt;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | that such co-venturer, co-tenant, or partner may at any time have economic or business interests or goals which are, or which become, inconsistent with
our business interests or goals; or
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | that such co-venturer, co-tenant, or partner may be in a position to take action contrary to our instructions or requests or contrary to our policies
or objectives.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Actions by such a co-venturer, co-tenant, or partner might result in subjecting the property to liabilities
in excess of those contemplated and may have the effect of reducing your returns.

Our General Partners will face various conflicts of
interest relating to joint ventures with affiliates.

Since our General Partners and their affiliates control both the Partnership and
other affiliates, transactions between the parties with respect to joint ventures between such parties do not have the benefit of arms-length negotiation of the type normally conducted between unrelated co-venturers. Under these joint venture
arrangements, neither co-venturer has the power to control the venture, and an impasse could be reached regarding matters pertaining to the joint venture, which might have a negative influence on the joint venture and decrease potential returns to
you. In the event that a co-venturer has a right of first refusal to buy out the other co-venturer, it may be unable to finance such a buy-out at that time. It may also be difficult for us to sell our interest in any such joint venture or
partnership or as a co-tenant in property. In addition, to the extent that our co-venturer, partner, or co-tenant is an affiliate of our General Partners, certain conflicts of interest will exist.

Federal Income Tax Risks

The Internal
Revenue Service (IRS) may challenge our characterization of material tax aspects of your investment in the Partnership.

An
investment in units involves certain material income tax risks, the character and extent of which are, to some extent, a function of whether you hold Cash Preferred Units or Tax Preferred Units. We will not seek any rulings from the IRS regarding
any of the tax issues related to your units.

Investors may realize taxable income without cash distributions.

As a limited partner in the Partnership, you are required to report your allocable share of the Partnerships taxable income on your personal income tax
return regardless of whether or not you have received any cash distributions from the Partnership. For example, if you hold Cash Preferred Units, you will be allocated substantially all of our net income, defined in the partnership agreement to mean
generally net income for federal income tax purposes, including any income exempt from tax, but excluding all deductions for depreciation and amortization and gain or loss from the sale of Partnership properties, even if such income is in excess of
any distributions of cash from our operations. In addition, if you hold Cash Preferred Units, you will be allocated your share of our net income with respect to such units even though net cash from our operations otherwise distributable to you will
instead be paid to third parties to satisfy the deferred commission obligations with respect to such units for a period of six years following the year of purchase, or longer if required to satisfy the outstanding commission obligation. If you hold
Cash Preferred Units, you will likely be allocated taxable income in excess of any distributions to you, and the amount of cash received by you could be less than the income tax attributable to the net income allocated to you.



Page 14



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

We could potentially be characterized as a publicly traded partnership resulting in unfavorable tax
results.

If the IRS were to classify the Partnership as a publicly traded partnership, we could be taxable as a corporation,
and distributions made to you could be treated as portfolio income to you rather than passive income. We cannot assure you that we will not, at some time in the future, be treated as a publicly traded partnership due to the following factors:



| |  |  | the complex nature of the IRS rules governing our potential exemption from classification as a publicly traded partnership;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the lack of interpretive guidance with respect to such rules; and
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the fact that any determination in this regard will necessarily be based upon events which have not yet occurred.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The IRS may challenge our allocations of profit and loss.

While it is more likely than not Partnership items of income, gain, loss, deduction, and credit will be allocated among our General Partners and our limited partners substantially in accordance with the
allocation provisions of the partnership agreement, we cannot assure you that the IRS will not successfully challenge the allocations in the partnership agreement and reallocate items of income, gain, loss, deduction, and credit in a manner which
reduces the anticipated tax benefits to investors holding Tax Preferred Units or increases the income allocated to investors holding Cash Preferred Units.

We may be audited and additional tax, interest, and penalties may be imposed upon you.

Our
federal income tax returns may be audited by the IRS. Any audit of the Partnership could result in an audit of your tax return causing adjustments of items unrelated to your investment in the Partnership, in addition to adjustments to various
Partnership items. In the event of any such adjustments, you might incur accountants or attorneys fees, court costs, and other expenses contesting deficiencies asserted by the IRS. You may also be liable for interest on any underpayment
and certain penalties from the date your tax was originally due. The tax treatment of all Partnership items will generally be determined at the Partnership level in a single proceeding rather than in separate proceedings with each partner, and our
General Partners are primarily responsible for contesting federal income tax adjustments proposed by the IRS. In this connection, our General Partners may extend the statute of limitations as to all partners and, in certain circumstances, may bind
the partners to a settlement with the IRS. Further, our General Partners may cause us to elect to be treated as an electing large partnership. If they do, we could take advantage of simplified flow-through reporting of Partnership items.
Adjustments to Partnership items would continue to be determined at the Partnership level, however, and any such adjustments would be accounted for in the year they take effect, rather than in the year to which such adjustments relate. Accordingly,
if you make an election to change the status of your units between the years in which a tax benefit is claimed and an adjustment is made, you may suffer a disproportionate adverse impact with respect to any such adjustment. Further, our General
Partners will have the discretion in such circumstances either to pass along any such adjustments to the partners or to bear such adjustments at the Partnership level, thereby potentially adversely impacting the holders of a particular class of
units disproportionately to holders of the other class of units.

State and local taxes and a requirement to withhold state taxes may
apply.

The state in which you reside may impose an income tax upon your share of our taxable income. Further, states in which we own
properties may impose income taxes upon your share of our taxable income allocable to any Partnership property located in that state or other taxes on limited partnerships owning properties in their states. Many states have implemented or are
implementing programs to require partnerships to withhold and pay state income taxes owed by nonresident partners relating to income-producing properties located in their states, and we may be required to withhold state taxes from cash distributions
otherwise payable to you. In the event we are



Page 15



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

required to withhold state taxes from your cash distributions, or pay other state taxes, the amount of the net cash from operations otherwise payable to you would be reduced. In addition, such
collection and filing requirements at the state level may result in increases in our administrative expenses which would have the effect of reducing cash available for distribution to you. You are urged to consult with your own tax advisors with
respect to the impact of applicable state and local taxes and state tax withholding requirements or other potential state taxes relating to an investment in our units.

Legislative or regulatory action could adversely affect investors.

In recent years,
numerous legislative, judicial, and administrative changes have been made in the provisions of the federal income tax laws applicable to investments similar to an investment in our units. Additional changes to the tax laws are likely to continue to
occur in the future, and we cannot assure you that any such changes will not adversely affect the taxation of a limited partner. Any such changes could have an adverse effect on an investment in our units or on the market value or the resale
potential of our properties. You are urged to consult with your own tax advisor with respect to the impact of recent legislation on your investment in units and the status of legislative, regulatory, or administrative developments and proposals and
their potential effect on an investment in our units.

Retirement Plan and Qualified Plan Risks

There are special considerations that apply to a pension or profit-sharing trust or an Individual Retirement Account (IRA) investing in units.

If you are investing the assets of a pension, profit-sharing, Section 401(k), Keogh, or other qualified retirement plan or the assets
of an IRA in units, you should satisfy yourself that:



| |  |  | your investment is consistent with your fiduciary obligations under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) and the Internal
Revenue Code;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | your investment is made in accordance with the documents and instruments governing your plan or IRA, including your plans investment policy;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | your investment satisfies the prudence and diversification requirements of Sections 404(a)(1)(B) and 404(a)(1)(C) of ERISA;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | your investment will not impair the liquidity of the plan or IRA;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | your investment will not produce unrelated business taxable income for the plan or IRA;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | you will be able to value the assets of the plan annually in accordance with ERISA requirements; and
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | your investment will not constitute a prohibited transaction under Section 406 of ERISA or Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We may dissolve the Partnership if our assets are deemed to be plan assets or if we engage in prohibited transactions.

If our assets were deemed to be assets of qualified plans investing as limited partners, i.e., plan assets, our General Partners would be
considered to be fiduciaries of such plans and certain contemplated transactions between our General Partners or their affiliates, and the Partnership may then be deemed to be prohibited transactions subject to excise taxation under
Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code. Additionally, if our assets were deemed to be plan assets, the standards of prudence and other provisions of ERISA applicable to plan fiduciaries would apply to the General Partners with respect to our
investments. We have not sought a ruling from the U.S. Department of Labor regarding the potential classification of our assets as plan assets.



Page 16



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

In this regard, U.S. Department of Labor regulations defining plan assets for purposes of ERISA contain
exemptions which, if satisfied, would preclude assets of a limited partnership such as ours from being treated as plan assets. We cannot assure you that our partnership agreement has been structured so that the exemptions in such Regulations would
apply to us, although our General Partners intend that an investment by a qualified plan in units will not be deemed an investment in the assets of the Partnership. We can make no representations or warranties of any kind regarding the consequences
of an investment in our units by qualified plans in this regard. Plan fiduciaries are urged to consult with, and rely upon, their own advisors with respect to this and other ERISA issues which, if decided adversely to the Partnership, could result
in qualified plan investors being deemed to have engaged in prohibited transactions, which would cause the imposition of excise taxes and co-fiduciary liability under Section 405 of ERISA in the event actions taken by us are deemed
to be nonprudent investments or prohibited transactions.

In the event our assets are deemed to constitute plan assets or certain
transactions undertaken by us are deemed to constitute prohibited transactions under ERISA or the Internal Revenue Code, and no exemption for such transactions is obtainable by us, the General Partners have the right, but not the
obligation, upon notice to all limited partners, but without the consent of any limited partner, to:



| |  |  | compel a termination and dissolution of the Partnership; or
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | restructure our activities to the extent necessary to comply with any exemption in the U.S. Department of Labor regulations or any prohibited
transaction exemption granted by the Department of Labor or any condition which the Department of Labor might impose as a condition to granting a prohibited transaction exemption.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Adverse tax consequences may result because of minimum distribution requirements.

If you hold units in an IRA or you intend to acquire units in a secondary market through your IRA, or if you are a custodian of an IRA or a trustee or other fiduciary of a retirement plan which is holding
units or is considering an acquisition of units through a secondary market, you must consider the limited liquidity of an investment in our units as it relates to applicable minimum distribution requirements under the Internal Revenue Code. If units
are held and our properties have not yet been sold at such time as mandatory distributions are required to begin to an IRA beneficiary or qualified plan participant, Sections 408(a)(6) and 401(a)(9) of the Internal Revenue Code will likely require
that a distribution-in-kind of the units be made to the IRA beneficiary or qualified plan participant. Any such distribution-in-kind of units must be included in the taxable income of the IRA beneficiary or qualified plan participant for the year in
which the units are received at the fair market value of the units, and taxes attributable thereto must be paid without any corresponding cash distributions from us with which to pay such income tax liability.

Unrelated business taxable income (UBTI) may be generated with respect to tax-exempt investors.

We do not intend or anticipate that the tax-exempt investors in the Partnership will be allocated income deemed to be derived from an unrelated trade or
business. Notwithstanding this, the General Partners do have limited authority to borrow funds deemed necessary:



| |  |  | to finance improvements necessary to protect capital previously invested in a property;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | to protect the value of our investment in a property; or
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | to make one of our properties more attractive for sale or lease.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------

Our General Partners have represented that they will not cause the Partnership to incur indebtedness unless they obtain an opinion from legal counsel or an opinion from our tax accountants that the
proposed indebtedness more than likely will not cause the income allocable to tax-exempt investors to be characterized as UBTI. Any such opinion will have no binding effect on the IRS or any court, however, and some risk remains that we may generate
UBTI for our tax-exempt investors in the event that it becomes necessary for us to borrow funds.



Page 17



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

Further, in the event we were deemed to be a dealer in real property, defined as one who holds
real estate primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business, the gain realized on the sale of our properties which is allocable to tax-exempt investors would be characterized as UBTI.



|ITEM 1B. | UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.
|-------- | --------------------------

There were no
unresolved SEC staff comments as of December 31, 2009.



|ITEM 2. | PROPERTIES.
|------- | -----------

Overview

The Partnership owns indirect interests in all of its real estate assets through joint ventures with other entities affiliated with the General Partners
and Piedmont Operating Partnership, LP (Piedmont OP), formerly known as Wells Operating Partnership, L.P. Piedmont OP is a Delaware limited partnership, with Piedmont REIT serving as its general partner. Piedmont REIT is a Maryland
corporation that qualifies as a real estate investment trust. During the periods presented, the Partnership owned interests in the following joint ventures (the Joint Ventures) and properties:



|                                                                             |  |                                                                        |  |             |  |                                                                                                        |  |                             |  |      |  |      |  |      |  |     
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | --------------------------- |  | ---- |  | ---- |  | ---- |  | ----
|                                                                             |  |                                                                        |  |             |  |                                                                                                        |  | Leased % as of December 31,
|Joint Venture                                                                |  | Joint Venture Partners                                                 |  | Ownership % |  | Properties                                                                                             |  | 2009                        |  | 2008 |  | 2007 |  | 2006 |  | 2005
|Wells Fund XIII-REIT Joint Venture Partnership (Fund XIII-REIT Associates) |  | Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P. Piedmont Operating Partnership, LP |  | 28.1%71.9%  |  | 1. AmeriCredit Building(1) A two-story officebuilding located
inOrange Park, Florida                   |  |                            |  |     |  |     |  |     |  |    
|                                                                             |  |                                                                        |  |             |  | 2. 8560 Upland Drive Two connected one-story office and assembly buildings located in Parker, Colorado |  | 100%                        |  | 100% |  | 100% |  | 100% |  | 100%
|                                                                             |  |                                                                        |  |             |  | 3. John Wiley Building(1) A four-story office building located in
Fishers, Indiana                     |  |                            |  |     |  |     |  |     |  |    
|                                                                             |  |                                                                        |  |             |  | 4. AIU  Chicago Building A four-story office building located in Hoffman Estates, Illinois            |  | 83%                         |  | 83%  |  | 83%  |  | 100% |  | 100%
|                                                                            
|Fund XIII and Fund XIV Associates (Fund XIII-XIV Associates)               |  | Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P. Wells Real Estate Fund XIV, L.P.   |  | 47.3%52.7%  |  | 5. Siemens  Orlando Building Two one-story office buildings located in Orlando, Florida               |  | 100%                        |  | 100% |  | 100% |  | 100% |  | 100%
|                                                                             |  |                                                                        |  |             |  | 6. Randstad  Atlanta Building(2) Four-story office building located in
Atlanta, Georgia               |  |                            |  |     |  |     |  | 100% |  | 100%
|                                                                             |  |                                                                        |  |             |  | 7.7500 Setzler Parkway(3) One-story office and warehouse building
located in Brooklyn Park, Minnesota  |  |                            |  |     |  |     |  | 100% |  | 100%
|                                                                            



| | (1) | These properties were sold in April 2005.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------



| | (2) | This property was sold in April 2007.
| | --- | -------------------------------------



| | (3) | This property was sold in January 2007.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------

Wells Real Estate Fund XIV, L.P. is affiliated with the Partnership through common general partners. Each of the properties described above was acquired on an all-cash basis.



Page 18



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

Lease Expirations

As of December 31, 2009, the lease expirations scheduled during the following 10 years for all properties in which the Partnership held an interest through the Joint Ventures, assuming no exercise of
renewal options or termination rights, are summarized below:



|                         |  |                         |  |                    |  |                                               |           |                                                                     |   |                                       |  |                                                                 |  |       
|------------------------ |  | ----------------------- |  | ------------------ |  | --------------------------------------------- | --------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------- | - | ------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------
|Year of Lease Expiration |  | Number ofLeasesExpiring |  | SquareFeetExpiring |  | AnnualizedGross
BaseRent in Year ofExpiration |           | PartnershipShare ofAnnualizedGross BaseRent in Year ofExpiration(1) |   | Percentageof TotalSquare FeetExpiring |  | Percentageof TotalAnnualizedGross BaseRent in Year
ofExpiration
|2010(2)                  |  | 1                       |  | 159,669            |  | $                                             | 2,578,655 |                                                                     | $ | 724,860                               |  | 40.9%                                                           |  | 47.9% 
|2011(3)                  |  | 2                       |  | 207,405            |  |                                               | 2,408,435 |                                                                     |   | 858,782                               |  | 53.2                                                            |  | 44.8  
|2012(4)                  |  | 1                       |  | 9,888              |  |                                               | 169,184   |                                                                     |   | 80,024                                |  | 2.5                                                             |  | 3.2   
|2013(5)                  |  | 1                       |  | 13,086             |  |                                               | 221,965   |                                                                     |   | 104,990                               |  | 3.4                                                             |  | 4.1   
|                         |  |                         |  |                    |  |                                               |           |                                                                     |   |                                       |  |                                                                 |  |       
|                         |  | 5                       |  | 390,048            |  | $                                             | 5,378,239 |                                                                     | $ | 1,768,656                             |  | 100.0%                                                          |  | 100.0%
|                         |  |                         |  |                    |  |                                               |           |                                                                     |   |                                       |  |                                                                 |  |       



| | (1) | The Partnerships share of annualized gross base rent in year of expiration is calculated based on the Partnerships ownership percentage
in the joint venture that owns the leased property.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | AIU  Chicago Building: American InterContinental University, Inc. lease (approximately 159,700 square feet).
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (3) | 8560 Upland Drive: Quantum Corporation lease (approximately 148,200 square feet) and Siemens  Orlando Building: Siemens Shared Services, LLC
lease (approximately 59,200 square feet).
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (4) | Siemens  Orlando Building: Etour and Travel, Inc. lease (approximately 9,900 square feet).
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (5) | Siemens  Orlando Building: Rinker Materials of Florida, Inc. lease (approximately 13,100 square feet).
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Property Descriptions

The properties in
which the Partnership owns an interest through the Joint Ventures during the periods presented are further described below:

AmeriCredit
Building

The AmeriCredit Building is a two-story office building containing approximately 85,000 rentable square feet located in Orange Park,
Florida. On April 13, 2005, the Fund XIII-REIT Associates sold the AmeriCredit Building to an unrelated third party, for a gross sale price of $14,444,000. As a result of the sale of the AmeriCredit Building, the Partnership received net sale
proceeds of approximately $4,020,000 and was allocated a gain of approximately $666,000.

8560 Upland Drive

The 8560 Upland Drive property consists of two one-story office buildings connected to a light assembly building containing approximately 148,000 rentable
square feet located in Parker, Colorado. Additionally, Fund XIII-REIT Associates purchased an undeveloped 3.43-acre tract of land immediately adjacent to 8560 Upland Drive. The 8560 Upland Drive property was under a lease agreement
with Advanced Digital Information Corporation (ADIC) for the entire property, which commenced in December 2001 and was set to expire on December 31, 2011. On July 31, 2006, ADIC assigned its lease rights to Quantum Corporation
(Quantum). Quantum has the right to extend the lease for two additional five-year periods of time by giving written notice to the landlord at least nine months prior to the expiration date of the then current lease term. The base rent
payable for each extended term of the lease will be the then-current market rate. As of December 31, 2009, the annualized base rent was approximately $1,404,000, increasing approximately 2% annually each January through the expiration of the
lease. The annualized base rent in 2011 will be approximately $1,461,000.



Page 19



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

John Wiley Building

The John Wiley Building is a four-story office building containing approximately 141,000 rentable square feet located in Fishers, Indiana. On April 13, 2005, Fund XIII-REIT Associates sold the John
Wiley Building to an unrelated third party, for a gross sale price of $21,530,000. As a result of the sale of the John Wiley Building, the Partnership received net sale proceeds of approximately $6,023,000 and was allocated a gain of approximately
$1,392,000.

AIU  Chicago Building

The AIU  Chicago Building is a four-story office building containing approximately 194,000 rentable square feet located in Hoffman Estates, Illinois. As of December 31, 2009, approximately 82% of the AIU  Chicago Building
is leased under a net lease agreement (i.e., operating costs and maintenance costs are paid by the tenants) with American InterContinental University, Inc. (AIU) (approximately 159,700 square feet). Approximately 1% of the building is
leased to Piedmont Office Management, LLC (approximately 1,200 square feet for the management office, expiring December 2025).

The initial
AIU lease, which included approximately 74,300 square feet, commenced in May 2002 and was set to expire in June 2008. AIU entered into lease amendments to occupy additional space, including (i) approximately 4,400 square feet, which commenced
in April 2003 and was also set to expire in June 2008, (ii) approximately 49,000 square feet, which commenced in July 2003 and expires in December 2010, (iii) approximately 4,100 square feet, which commenced in May 2004 and also
expires in December 2010, (iv) approximately 13,500 square feet, which commenced in February 2005 and was set to expire in October 2008, and (v) approximately 7,200 square feet, which commenced in February 2005 and was set to expire in
June 2008. In October 2005, AIU amended its lease in order to occupy additional space of approximately 7,300 square feet, which had previously been leased to WFS Financial, and to extend all of the termination dates to December 31, 2010. AIU
has a right of first offer to lease additional space in the AIU  Chicago Building upon such space becoming available. The AIU lease prohibits Fund XIII-REIT Associates from leasing any space in the AIU  Chicago Building to any business,
which offers post-high school or corporate training as its primary function. As of December 31, 2009, the annual base rent payable under the AIU lease was approximately $2,504,000. The annualized rent payable in 2010 for the AIU lease expiring
will be approximately $2,579,000.

Philips Electronics North America Corporation (Philips North America) is a wholly owned
subsidiary of Philips Holding USA Inc., which is a wholly owned subsidiary of Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. (Philips). Philips North America manages the North American operations of Philips, a worldwide electronics manufacturer.
The Philips North America lease covered approximately 32,900 rentable square feet and commenced in July 2002 and expired in July 2007. After fulfilling the terms of the lease, Philips North America vacated the space, and it currently remains
unoccupied.

Siemens  Orlando Building

The Siemens  Orlando Building is comprised of two single-story office buildings containing approximately 82,000 aggregate rentable square feet, on an approximately 7.5-acre tract of land located in Orlando, Florida. The Siemens
 Orlando Building, which was completed in 2002, is under lease agreements with Siemens Shared Services, LLC (approximately 72%); Rinker Materials of Florida, Inc. (approximately 16%); and Etour and Travel, Inc. (approximately 12%). Siemens
Shared Services, LLC (Siemens) occupies approximately 59,200 rentable square feet of the Siemens  Orlando Building. The initial Siemens lease, which included approximately 52,100 square feet, commenced on October 1, 2002
and expired on September 30, 2009. On August 15, 2007, Siemens exercised its right of first refusal to lease approximately 7,100 additional square feet of space through September 30, 2009, which had been vacated by Best Buy Stores,
L.P. (Best Buy) in January 2007. On May 20, 2009, Fund XIII-XIV Associates completed a lease amendment with Siemens, which extended the termination date of the lease from September 30, 2009 to September 30, 2011. As of
December 31, 2009, the annual base rent payable under the Siemens lease was approximately $919,000. The annualized base rent payable will increase to $947,000 in October 2010 and remain the same through the expiration of the lease.



Page 20



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

Rinker Materials of Florida, Inc. (Rinker) occupies approximately 13,100 rentable square feet of
the Siemens  Orlando Building. The Rinker lease commenced in April 2003 and expires in April 2013. Rinker has the right, at its option, to extend the initial term of its lease for two additional five-year periods at the then-current market
rental rate but not less than the base rent last payable under this lease as renewed. As of December 31, 2009, the annual base rent payable under the Rinker lease is approximately $203,000, increasing approximately 3% annually each April
through the expiration of the lease. The annualized base rent payable in 2013 will be approximately $222,000.

Etour and Travel, Inc.
(Etour), formerly Cape Canaveral Tour and Travel, Inc., occupies approximately 9,900 rentable square feet of the Siemens  Orlando Building. Etour is a subsidiary of Kosmas Group International, Inc. (Kosmas),
the guarantor of the Etour leases. The Etour lease was set to expire November 30, 2007. On May 24, 2007, Etour exercised its first renewal option which commenced on December 1, 2007 and expires on November 30, 2012. Etour has the
right, at its option, to extend the initial term of its lease for one additional five-year period at the then-current market rental rate. As of December 31, 2009, the annual base rent payable under the Etour lease was approximately $159,000.
The annualized base rent payable in 2012 will be approximately $169,000.

Best Buy occupied approximately 7,100 rentable square feet of the
Siemens  Orlando Building. Best Buy is a wholly owned subsidiary of Best Buy Co., Inc. (Best Buy Co.). Best Buy Co. is a retailer of consumer electronics, personal computers, entertainment software, and appliances in North America.
The Best Buy lease commenced in October 2001 and expired in November 2006; however, Best Buy continued to occupy the space until January 2007 at a rate of 125% of base rent payable, which was approximately $14,000 per month.

Randstad  Atlanta Building

The Randstad
 Atlanta Building is a four-story office building containing approximately 65,000 aggregate rentable square feet, on an approximately 2.9-acre tract of land located in Atlanta, Georgia. On April 24, 2007, Fund XIII-XIV Associates
sold the Randstad  Atlanta Building to an unrelated third party for a gross sale price of $9,250,000. As a result of the sale, the Partnership received net sale proceeds of approximately $4,254,000 and was allocated a gain of approximately
$1,390,000.

7500 Setzler Parkway

The 7500 Setzler Parkway property is a single-story office and warehouse building containing approximately 120,000 rentable square feet located on a 10.32-acre tract of land in Brooklyn Park, Minnesota. On January 31, 2007,
Fund XIII-XIV Associates sold 7500 Setzler Parkway to an unrelated third party for a gross sale price of $8,950,000. As a result of the sale, the Partnership received net sale proceeds of approximately $4,126,000 and was allocated a gain of
approximately $1,025,000.



|ITEM 3. | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
|------- | ------------------

From time to time,
we are party to legal proceedings which arise in the ordinary course of our business. We are not currently involved in any litigation for which the outcome would, in the judgment of the General Partners based on information currently available, have
a materially adverse impact on the results of operations or financial condition of the Partnership, nor is management aware of any such litigation threatened against us. For a description of pending litigation involving certain related parties, see
Assertion of Legal Action Against Related-Parties in Item 1. of this report.



|ITEM 4. | RESERVED.
|------- | ---------



Page 21



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

PART II



|ITEM 5. | MARKET FOR PARTNERSHIPS UNITS AND RELATED SECURITY HOLDER MATTERS.
|------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------

Summary

As of February 28, 2010, 3,215,584 Cash Preferred Units and 556,464 Tax
Preferred Units, held by a total of 1,268 and 137 limited partners, respectively, were outstanding. Original capital contributions were equal to $10.00 per each limited partnership unit; to date, the Partnership has returned capital in the form
of distributions of net sale proceeds to its limited partners equal to, on average, $4.36 per Cash Preferred Unit and $7.89 per Tax Preferred Unit, as further described below. A public trading market has not been established for the
Partnerships limited partnership units, nor is such a market anticipated to develop in the future. The partnership agreement provides the General Partners with the right to prohibit transfers of units under certain circumstances.

Unit Valuation

Because fiduciaries of
retirement plans subject to ERISA and the IRA custodians are required to determine and report the value of the assets held in their respective plans or accounts on an annual basis, the General Partners are required under the partnership agreement to
report estimated unit values to the limited partners each year in the Partnerships Annual Report on Form 10-K. The methodology to be utilized for determining such estimated unit values under the partnership agreement requires the General
Partners to estimate the amount a unit holder would receive assuming that the Partnerships properties were sold at their estimated fair market values as of the end of the Partnerships fiscal year and the proceeds therefrom (without any
reduction for selling expenses) plus the amount of net sale proceeds held by the Partnership at year-end from previous property sales, if any, were distributed to the limited partners in liquidation in accordance with the net sale proceeds
distribution allocation outlined in the partnership agreement. The estimated unit valuations are intended to be an estimate of the distributions that would be made to limited partners who purchased their units directly from the Partnership in the
Partnerships original public offering of units.

The General Partners of the Partnership recently completed their estimated unit
valuations as of December 31, 2009. Utilizing the foregoing methodology, the General Partners have estimated the Partnerships unit valuations, based on their estimates of property values as of December 31, 2009, to be approximately
$3.92 per Cash Preferred Unit and $3.88 per Tax Preferred Unit, based upon market conditions existing in early December 2009. These estimates should not be viewed as an accurate reflection of the value of the limited partners units, how much
limited partners might be able to sell their units for, or the fair market value of the Partnerships properties, nor do they necessarily represent the amount of net proceeds limited partners would receive if the Partnerships properties
were sold and the proceeds were distributed in a liquidation of the Partnership. There is no established public trading market for the Partnerships limited partnership units, and it is not anticipated that a public trading market for the units
will ever develop. In addition, property values are subject to change and could decline in the future. While, as required by the partnership agreement, the General Partners have obtained an opinion from The David L. Beal Company, an independent
appraiser certified by the Member Appraisal Institute, to the effect that such estimates of value were deemed reasonable and were prepared in accordance with appropriate methods for valuing real estate, no actual appraisals were obtained due to the
inordinate expense that would be involved in obtaining appraisals for all of the Partnerships properties.

The valuations performed by
the General Partners are estimates only and are based on a number of assumptions which may not be accurate or complete and may or may not be applicable to any specific limited partnership units. For example, as a result of the availability of
conversion elections under the partnership agreement and the resulting complexities involved relating to the distribution methodology under the partnership agreement, each limited partnership unit of the Partnership potentially has its own unique
characteristics as to distributions and value. These estimated valuations are applicable only to limited partners who purchased their units directly from the Partnership in the Partnerships original public offering of units. Further, as set
forth above, no third-party



Page 22



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

appraisals have or will be obtained. For these reasons, the estimated unit valuations set forth above should not be used by or relied upon by investors, other than fiduciaries of retirement plans
and IRA custodians for limited ERISA and IRA reporting purposes, as any indication of the fair market value of their units. In addition, it should be noted that ERISA plan fiduciaries and IRA custodians may use estimated unit valuations obtained
from other sources, such as prices paid for the Partnerships units in secondary market trades, and that such estimated unit valuations may well be lower than those estimated by the General Partners using the methodology required by the
partnership agreement.

It should also be noted that as the Partnerships properties are sold and the net proceeds from property sales
are distributed to limited partners, the remaining value of the Partnerships portfolio of properties, and resulting value of Partnerships limited partnership units, will naturally decline. In considering the foregoing estimated unit
valuations, it should be noted that the Partnership has previously distributed net sale proceeds in the amount of $4.36 per Cash Preferred Unit and $7.89 per Tax Preferred Unit to its limited partners. These amounts are intended to represent
the per-unit distributions received by limited partners who purchased their units directly from the Partnership in the Partnerships original public offering of units, and who have made no conversion elections under the partnership agreement.
Limited partners who have made one or more conversion elections would have received a different level of per-unit distribution.

Operating
Distributions

Operating cash available for distribution to the limited partners is generally distributed on a quarterly basis. Under the
partnership agreement, distributions from net cash from operations are allocated first to the limited partners holding Cash Preferred Units (and limited partners holding Tax Preferred Units that have elected a conversion right that allows them to
share in the distribution rights of limited partners holding Cash Preferred Units) until they have received 10% of their adjusted capital contributions. Cash available for distribution is then distributed to the General Partners until they have
received an amount equal to 10% of cash distributions previously distributed to the limited partners. Any remaining cash available for distribution is split between the limited partners holding Cash Preferred Units and the General Partners on a
basis of 90% and 10%, respectively.

Operating cash distributions made to limited partners holding Cash Preferred Units during 2008 and 2009
are summarized below:



|                                          |  |                                |  |                  |  |                 
|----------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------ |  | ---------------- |  | ----------------
|                                          |  | Per Cash Preferred Unit       
|Operating Distributions for Quarter Ended |  | TotalOperating CashDistributed |  | InvestmentIncome |  | Return ofCapital
|March 31, 2008                            |  | $272,154                       |  | $0.00            |  | $0.08           
|June 30, 2008                             |  | $136,140                       |  | $0.00            |  | $0.04           
|September 30, 2008                        |  | $           0                  |  | $0.00            |  | $0.00           
|December 31, 2008                         |  | $           0                  |  | $0.00            |  | $0.00           
|March 31, 2009                            |  | $136,143                       |  | $0.00            |  | $0.04           
|June 30, 2009                             |  | $136,143                       |  | $0.00            |  | $0.04           
|September 30, 2009                        |  | $           0                  |  | $0.00            |  | $0.00           
|December 31, 2009                         |  | $           0                  |  | $0.00            |  | $0.00           

Operating distributions were
accrued for accounting purposes in the quarter earned and paid to the Cash Preferred limited partners in the following quarter. No operating cash distributions were paid to holders of Tax Preferred Units or to the General Partners during the years
ended December 31, 2008 or 2009.



Page 23



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

|ITEM 6. | SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.
|------- | ------------------------

A summary of
the selected financial data as of and for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, 2007, 2006, and 2005 for the Partnership is provided below. The comparability of net income for the periods presented below is impacted by the sale of
properties described in Item 2.



|                                                                                       |  |      |            |      |   |            |  |      |            |  |      |            |   |  |   |           
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ---------- | ---- | - | ---------- |  | ---- | ---------- |  | ---- | ---------- | - |  | - | ----------
|                                                                                       |  | 2009 |            | 2008 |   | 2007       |  | 2006 |            |  | 2005
|Total assets                                                                           |  | $    | 13,950,731 |      | $ | 13,603,459 |  | $    | 13,915,352 |  | $    | 20,961,702 |   |  | $ | 21,981,962
|Equity in income of Joint Ventures                                                     |  | $    | 786,177    |      | $ | 573,477    |  | $    | 3,026,738  |  | $    | 925,459    |   |  | $ | 3,023,505 
|Net income                                                                             |  | $    | 626,923    |      | $ | 392,684    |  | $    | 3,066,532  |  | $    | 789,548    |   |  | $ | 3,028,062 
|Net income (loss) allocated to:                                                        |  |      |            |      |   |            |  |      |            |  |      |            |   |  |   |           
|Cash Preferred Limited Partners                                                        |  | $    | 623,377    |      | $ | 390,028    |  | $    | 1,290,150  |  | $    | 1,756,977  |   |  | $ | 2,295,882 
|Tax Preferred Limited Partners                                                         |  | $    | 0          |      | $ | 0          |  | $    | 1,776,382  |  | $    | (967,429   | ) |  | $ | 732,180   
|General Partners                                                                       |  | $    | 3,546      |      | $ | 2,656      |  | $    | 0          |  | $    | 0          |   |  | $ | 0         
|Net income (loss) per weighted-average Limited Partner Unit:                           |  |      |            |      |   |            |  |      |            |  |      |            |   |  |   |           
|Cash Preferred                                                                         |  |      | $0.19      |      |   | $0.12      |  |      | $0.40      |  |      | $ 0.55     |   |  |   | $0.73     
|Tax Preferred                                                                          |  |      | $0.00      |      |   | $0.00      |  |      | $3.17      |  |      | $(1.75     | ) |  |   | $1.18     
|Operating Cash Distributions per weighted-average Cash Preferred Limited Partner Unit: |  |      |            |      |   |            |  |      |            |  |      |            |   |  |   |           
|Investment Income                                                                      |  |      | $0.00      |      |   | $0.00      |  |      | $0.45      |  |      | $ 0.56     |   |  |   | $0.64     
|Return of Capital                                                                      |  |      | $0.08      |      |   | $0.13      |  |      | $0.03      |  |      | $ 0.00     |   |  |   | $0.00     
|Operating Cash Distributions per weighted-average Tax Preferred Limited Partner Unit:  |  |      |            |      |   |            |  |      |            |  |      |            |   |  |   |           
|Investment Income                                                                      |  |      | $0.00      |      |   | $0.00      |  |      | $0.00      |  |      | $ 0.00     |   |  |   | $0.00     
|Return of Capital                                                                      |  |      | $0.00      |      |   | $0.00      |  |      | $0.00      |  |      | $ 0.00     |   |  |   | $0.00     
|Distribution of net sale proceeds per weighted-average Limited Partner Unit:           |  |      |            |      |   |            |  |      |            |  |      |            |   |  |   |           
|Cash Preferred                                                                         |  |      | $0.00      |      |   | $0.00      |  |      | $2.05      |  |      | $ 0.00     |   |  |   | $2.35     
|Tax Preferred                                                                          |  |      | $0.00      |      |   | $0.00      |  |      | $3.27      |  |      | $ 0.00     |   |  |   | $4.15     



|ITEM 7. | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
|------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the Selected Financial Data presented in Item 6 and our accompanying financial
statements and notes thereto. See also Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements preceding Part I of this report and Risk Factors in Item 1A. of this report.

Overview

Portfolio Overview

We have transitioned from the holding phase to the positioning-for-sale phase of our life cycle. We have sold four of the seven properties
in which we have held interests. On May 20, 2009, Fund XIII-XIV Associates completed a lease amendment with Siemens, the majority tenant at the Siemens  Orlando Building, which extended the termination date of the lease from
September 30, 2009 to September 30, 2011. Our focus in the near-term is to concentrate on re-leasing and marketing efforts that we believe will ultimately result in the best disposition pricing for our investors.

The fourth quarter 2009 operating distributions to limited partners holding Cash Preferred Units were reserved. We anticipate that operating distributions
will be reserved in the near-term as a result of our intention to fund our



Page 24



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

pro rata share of anticipated re-leasing costs and capital improvements for the AIU  Chicago Building and the tenant allowance reimbursement obligation for the Siemens-Orlando Building.

Property Summary

As we move
further into the positioning-for-sale phase, we will continue to focus on re-leasing vacant space and space that may become vacant upon the expiration of our current leases. In doing so, we will seek to maximize returns to our limited partners by
negotiating long-term leases at market rental rates while attempting to minimize down time, re-leasing expenditures, ongoing property level costs, and portfolio costs. As properties are positioned for sale, our attention will shift to locating
suitable buyers, negotiating purchase-sale contracts that will attempt to maximize the total return to our limited partners and minimize contingencies and our post-closing involvement with buyers. As of February 28, 2010, the Partnership owned
interests in three properties.

Information relating to the properties owned, or previously owned, by the Joint Ventures is provided below:



| |  |  | The AmeriCredit Building was sold on April 13, 2005.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | The John Wiley Building was sold on April 13, 2005.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | The 7500 Setzler Parkway building was sold on January 31, 2007.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | The Randstad  Atlanta Building was sold on April 24, 2007.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | 8560 Upland Drive, located in Parker, Colorado, is 100% leased through December 2011.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | The AIU  Chicago Building, located in Hoffman Estates, Illinois, a suburb of Chicago, is currently 83% leased through December 2010. We are
actively working on re-leasing the remaining vacant space in this building.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | The Siemens  Orlando Building, located in Orlando, Florida, is currently 100% leased to three tenants. The major lease to Siemens extends through
September 2011.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Industry Factors

Our results continue to be impacted by a number of factors influencing the real estate industry.

General Economic Conditions and Real Estate Market Commentary

Management reviews a number of economic forecasts and market
commentaries in order to evaluate general economic conditions and to formulate a view of the current environments effect on the real estate markets in which we operate.

As measured by the U.S. gross domestic product (GDP), the U.S. economys growth increased at an annual rate of 5.9% in the fourth quarter of 2009, according to preliminary estimates. For
the full year of 2009, real GDP decreased 2.4% compared with a growth rate of 0.4% in 2008. The decrease in real GDP in 2009 reflected negative contributions from nonresidential fixed investment, private inventory investment, residential fixed
investment, and personal consumption expenditures.

Real estate market fundamentals underlying the U.S. office markets continued to
deteriorate in 2009, as evidenced by a vacancy rate of 17.0% for the fourth quarter compared to 14.5% vacancy this same time a year ago. There was negative net absorption of 81 million square feet in 2009 in addition to the 42 million
square feet of negative absorption in 2008. Average rents also have declined from their peak of $29.37 in third quarter 2008, to current rates of $27.80, a decline of 5.3%.



Page 25



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

Office fundamentals deteriorated as expected in 2009 with rising vacancies, lower rental rates and negative
absorption. Though the recession may have technically ended, the labor markets have yet to stabilize. Until labor markets stabilize and businesses start hiring again, thereby requiring more space, office market fundamentals will remain weak.

Transaction volume was significantly lower in 2009 compared with earlier years. The volume of office properties selling for more than $5
million decreased to $15.5 billion in 2009, a 71% decrease from 2008 numbers and a 93% decrease from the $211 billion recorded in 2007. However, the second half of 2009 was more active than the first half, implying that the investment markets could
be improving. The anticipation of distressed sales of over-leveraged properties in 2009 never fully materialized, as lenders have generally opted to extend or restructure loans to avoid foreclosures.

Impact of Economic Conditions on our Portfolio

While some of the market conditions noted above may indicate expected changes in rental rates, the extent to which our portfolio may be affected is dependent upon the contractual rental rates currently provided in existing leases at the
properties we own. As the majority of our in-place leases are at properties that were acquired at times during which the market demanded higher rental rates, as compared with today, new leasing activities in certain markets may result in a decrease
in future rental rates. Additionally, the turbulence in the credit markets may adversely affect the ability of potential purchasers of our properties to obtain financing.

Less diversified real estate funds that own fewer properties, such as the Partnership, and those with current vacancies or near-term tenant rollover, such as the Partnership, may face an increasingly
challenging leasing environment. The properties within these funds may be required to offer lower rental rates and higher concession packages to potential tenants, the degree to which will depend heavily on the specific property and market.

From a valuation standpoint, it is generally preferable to either renew an existing tenant lease or re-lease the property prior to marketing
it for sale. Generally, buyers will heavily discount their offering prices to compensate for existing or pending vacancies.

Liquidity and
Capital Resources

Overview

Our operating strategy entails funding expenditures related to the recurring operations of the Joint Ventures properties and the portfolio with operating cash flows, including current and prior period operating distributions received
from the Joint Ventures, and assessing the amount of remaining cash flows that will be required to fund known future re-leasing costs and other capital improvements. Any residual operating cash flows are generally considered available for
distribution to the Cash Preferred limited partners and, unless reserved, are generally paid quarterly. To the extent that operating cash flows are insufficient to fund our recurring operations, net sale proceeds will be utilized. As a result, the
ongoing monitoring of our cash position is critical to ensuring that adequate liquidity and capital resources are available. Economic downturns in one or more of our core markets could adversely impact the ability of one or more of our tenants to
honor lease payments and our ability to re-lease space on favorable terms as leases expire or space otherwise becomes vacant. In the event of either situation, cash flows and, consequently, our ability to provide funding for capital needs could be
adversely affected.

Short-Term Liquidity

During the year ended December 31, 2009, we generated net operating cash flows, including operating distributions received from the Joint Ventures, of approximately $1,262,000. Operating
distributions from the Joint Ventures are generally representative of rental revenues and tenant reimbursements, less property operating



Page 26



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

expenses, management fees, general administrative expenses, and capital expenditures. We used net operating cash flows to fund operating distributions of approximately $272,000 to Cash Preferred
limited partners during the year ended December 31, 2009 and reserved the remainder to fund our pro rata share of anticipated re-leasing costs and capital improvements for the AIU  Chicago Building and the tenant allowance reimbursement
obligation for the Siemens  Orlando Building. The extent of any future operating distributions paid to limited partners will be largely dependent upon the amount of cash generated from the Joint Ventures, our expectations of future cash flows,
and determination of near-term cash needs to fund our share of tenant re-leasing costs and other capital improvements for properties owned by the Joint Ventures. We anticipate that operating distributions from the Joint Ventures may decline in the
near-term as a result of funding our pro rata share of anticipated re-leasing costs and capital improvements for the AIU  Chicago Building and the tenant allowance reimbursement obligation for the Siemens  Orlando Building.

At this time, we expect to continue to generate cash flows from operations, including distributions from the Joint Ventures, sufficient to cover our
estimated future expenses. We also believe that the cash on hand and operating distributions due from the Joint Ventures are sufficient to cover our working capital needs, including those provided for within our total liabilities of approximately
$36,000, as of December 31, 2009.

Long-Term Liquidity

We expect that our future sources of capital will be primarily derived from operating cash flows generated from the Joint Ventures and net proceeds generated from the sale of properties. Our future
long-term liquidity requirements will include, but not be limited to, funding our share of tenant improvements, renovations, expansions, and other significant capital improvements necessary for properties owned through the Joint Ventures. We expect
to continue to use substantially all future net cash flows from operations, including distributions received from the Joint Ventures, less expenses related to the recurring operations of the properties and the portfolio and reserves for known
capital expenditures, to pay operating distributions to the limited partners. Future cash flows from operating activities will be primarily affected by distributions received from the Joint Ventures, which are dependent upon the net operating income
generated by the Joint Ventures properties, less reserves for known or anticipated capital expenditures.

Capital Resources

The Partnership is an investment vehicle formed for the purpose of acquiring, owning, and operating income-producing real properties, or
investing in joint ventures formed for the same purpose, and has invested all of the partners original net offering proceeds available for investment. Thus, it is unlikely that we will acquire interests in any additional properties or joint
ventures. Historically, our investment strategy has generally involved acquiring properties that are preleased to creditworthy tenants on an all-cash basis through joint ventures with affiliated partnerships.

The Joint Ventures incur capital expenditures primarily related to building improvements for the purpose of maintaining the quality of our properties, and
tenant improvements for the purpose of readying our properties for re-leasing. As leases expire, we will work with the Joint Ventures to attempt to re-lease space to an existing tenant or market the space to prospective new tenants. Generally,
tenant improvements funded in connection with lease renewals require less capital than those funded in connection with new leases. However, external conditions, such as the supply of and demand for comparable space available within a given market,
drive capital costs as well as rental rates. Any capital or other expenditures not funded from the operations of the Joint Ventures will be required to be funded by the Partnership and the other respective joint venture partners on a pro rata basis.

Operating cash flows, if available, are generally distributed from the Joint Ventures to the Partnership approximately one month following
calendar quarter-ends. However, the Joint Ventures will reserve operating distributions, or a portion thereof, as needed in order to fund known capital and other expenditures. Our cash



Page 27



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

management policy typically includes first utilizing current period operating cash flow until depleted, at which point operating reserves are utilized to fund capital and other required
expenditures. In the event that current and prior period accumulated operating cash flows are insufficient to fund such costs, net sale proceeds reserves, if available, would then be utilized.

As of December 31, 2009, we have received, used, distributed, and held net sale proceeds allocated to the Partnership from the sale of properties as
presented below:



|                                        |  |                  |  |                                     |  |                                             |            |                         |    |                                                                |   |                                                       |   |            |  |   |       
|--------------------------------------- |  | ---------------- |  | ----------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------- | ---------- | ----------------------- | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------- | - | ----------------------------------------------------- | - | ---------- |  | - | ------
|Property Sold                           |  | Net SaleProceeds |  | PartnershipsApproximateOwnership % |  | Net SaleProceedsAllocated to thePartnership |            | Use ofNet Sale Proceeds |    | Net Sale ProceedsDistributed toPartners as ofDecember 31, 2009 |   | Undistributed NetSale Proceeds as ofDecember 31, 2009
|                                        |  |                  |  | Amount                              |  | Purpose                                     |            |                        
|AmeriCredit Building(sold in 2005)      |  | $14,301,802      |  | 28.11%                              |  | $                                           | 4,020,236  |                         | $0 |                                                                |  |                                                       | $ | 4,020,236  |  | $ | 0     
|                                        |  |                  |  |                                     |  |                                             |           
|John Wiley Building(sold in 2005)       |  | $21,427,599      |  | 28.11%                              |  |                                             | 6,023,298  |                         | 0  |                                                                |  |                                                       |   | 6,023,298  |  |   | 0     
|                                        |  |                  |  |                                     |  |                                             |           
|7500 Setzler Parkway(sold in 2007)      |  | $8,723,080       |  | 47.30%                              |  |                                             | 4,126,017  |                         | 0  |                                                                |  |                                                       |   | 4,126,017  |  |   | 0     
|                                        |  |                  |  |                                     |  |                                             |           
|Randstad-Atlanta Building(sold in 2007) |  | $8,992,600       |  | 47.30%                              |  |                                             | 4,253,500  |                         | 0  |                                                                |  |                                                       |   | 4,240,448  |  |   | 13,052
|                                        |  |                  |  |                                     |  |                                             |            |                         |    |                                                                |   |                                                       |   |            |  |   |       
|Total                                   |  |                  |  |                                     |  | $                                           | 18,423,051 |                         | $0 |                                                                |   |                                                       | $ | 18,409,999 |  | $ | 13,052
|                                        |  |                  |  |                                     |  |                                             |            |                         |    |                                                                |   |                                                       |   |            |  |   |       

Upon evaluating the capital needs of the properties in which we
currently own an interest, our General Partners have determined to reserve the remaining net sale proceeds.

Results of Operations

Comparison of the year ended December 31, 2009 vs. the year ended December 31, 2008

Equity in Income of Joint Ventures

Equity in
income of Joint Ventures was $786,177 and $573,477 for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The increase is primarily attributable to a decrease in amortization of intangible lease assets due to the expiration of the
original term of leases in-place at the time of acquisition at the AIU  Chicago Building in June 2008 and the Siemens  Orlando Building in September 2009 as well as a decrease in repair and maintenance expenses at the AIU  Chicago
Building.

Given the stability of these properties, we anticipate equity in income of the Joint Ventures to remain at similar levels in the
near-term; however, if the majority tenant of the AIU  Chicago Building does not extend its current lease (which is currently scheduled to expire in December 2010) and we are unable to secure replacement tenants in a timely manner, we would
expect equity in income of Joint Ventures to decline in future periods.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses were $159,254 and $181,724 for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The decrease is primarily
attributable to a decrease in Illinois replacement taxes as well as a temporary difference in accounting fees related to the timing of work performed by our external accountants in 2009 as compared to the prior year. We estimate Illinois replacement
taxes based on an estimate of the apportionment of income allocable to the Partnership from the property in Illinois relative to income allocable to the Partnership from all properties as if earned ratably during the calendar year. Thus, our future
estimates of Illinois replacement tax expenses will fluctuate as the relationship of income earned by the Partnership from the property in Illinois fluctuates relative to income earned by the Partnership from all properties in the future.

Absent timing differences, we anticipate that changes in the future levels of our general and administrative expenses will vary primarily
based on future changes in our reporting and regulatory requirements.



Page 28



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

Comparison of the year ended December 31, 2008 vs. the year ended December 31, 2007

Equity in Income of Joint Ventures

Equity in income of Joint Ventures was $573,477 and $3,026,738 for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The decrease is primarily attributable to the gain recognized on the sales of 7500 Setzler Parkway in January
2007 and the Randstad  Atlanta Building in April 2007 and a corresponding decline in operating income resulting from the aforementioned sales.

Interest and Other Income

Interest and other income was $931 and $203,616 for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. The decrease is primarily the result of a decrease in the average amount of net sale proceeds held during the respective periods due to the distributions of net sale proceeds to limited partners in August 2007 and November 2007, as
well as a decrease in the average daily yield.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses were $181,724 and $163,822 for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The increase is primarily
attributable to an increase in Illinois replacement taxes and an increase in administrative costs relating to compliance with additional reporting and regulatory requirements. We estimate Illinois replacement taxes based on an estimate of the
apportionment of income allocable to the Partnership from the property in Illinois relative to income allocable to the Partnership from all properties as if earned ratably during the calendar year. Thus, our future estimates of Illinois replacement
tax expenses will fluctuate as the relationship of income earned by the Partnership from the property in Illinois fluctuates relative to income earned by the Partnership from all properties in the future.

Inflation

We are exposed to inflation
risk, as income from long-term leases is the primary source of our cash flows from operations. There are provisions in the majority of our tenant leases that are intended to help protect us from the impact of inflation. These provisions include rent
steps, reimbursement billings for operating expense pass-through charges, real estate tax and insurance reimbursements on a per-square-foot basis, or in some cases, annual reimbursement of operating expenses above a certain per-square-foot
allowance. However, due to the long-term nature of our leases, the leases may not readjust their reimbursement rates frequently enough to cover inflation.

Application of Critical Accounting Policies

Our accounting policies have been established
to conform with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to use judgment in the application of accounting policies, including making
estimates and assumptions. These judgments affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the
reporting periods. If managements judgment or interpretation of the facts and circumstances relating to various transactions had been different, it is possible that different accounting policies would have been applied, thus resulting in a
different presentation of the financial statements. Additionally, other companies may utilize different estimates that may impact comparability of our results of operations to those of companies in similar businesses.

Below is a discussion of the accounting policies that management considers to be critical in that they may require complex judgment in their application or
require estimates about matters that are inherently uncertain.



Page 29



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

Real Estate Assets

Investment in Real Estate Assets

We are required to make subjective assessments as to the
useful lives of our depreciable assets. We consider the period of future benefit of the asset to determine the appropriate useful lives. These assessments have a direct impact on net income. The estimated useful lives of the Joint Ventures
assets are depreciated or amortized using the straight-line method over the following useful lives:



|                        |  |                                       
|----------------------- |  | --------------------------------------
|Buildings               |  | 40 years                              
|Building improvements   |  | 5-25 years                            
|Land improvements       |  | 20 years                              
|Tenant improvements     |  | Shorter of lease term or economic life
|Intangible lease assets |  | Lease term                            

In the event that the Joint Ventures utilize
inappropriate useful lives or methods of depreciation, our net income would be misstated.

Evaluating the Recoverability of Real Estate
Assets

We continually monitor events and changes in circumstances that could indicate that the carrying amounts of the real estate assets
and related intangible assets in which we have an ownership interest through investments in the Joint Ventures, may not be recoverable. When indicators of potential impairment are present which suggest that the carrying amounts of real estate assets
and related intangible assets may not be recoverable, we assess the recoverability of the real estate assets and related intangible assets by determining whether the respective carrying values will be recovered through the estimated undiscounted
future operating cash flows expected from the use of the assets and their eventual disposition for assets held for use, or with the estimated fair values, less costs to sell, for assets held for sale. In the event that such expected undiscounted
future cash flows for assets held for use, or the estimated fair values less costs to sell, for assets held for sale, do not exceed the respective assets carrying values, we adjust the real estate assets and related intangible assets to their
respective estimated fair values, pursuant to the provisions of the property, plant, and equipment accounting standard for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets, and recognize an impairment loss. Estimated fair values are determined
based on the following information, dependent upon availability: (i) recently quoted market price(s) for the subject property, or highly comparable properties, under sufficiently active and normal market conditions, or (ii) the present
value of future cash flows, including estimated residual value. We have determined that there has been no impairment in the carrying value of any of our real estate assets held as of December 31, 2009.

Projections of expected future cash flows require that we estimate future market rental income amounts subsequent to the expiration of current lease
agreements, property operating expenses, the number of months it takes to re-lease the property, and the number of years the property is held for investment, among other factors. The subjectivity of assumptions used in the future cash flow analysis,
including discount rates, could result in an incorrect assessment of the propertys future cash flows and fair value, and could result in the misstatement of the carrying values of real estate assets and related intangible assets held by the
Joint Ventures and net income of the Partnership.

Related-Party Transactions and Agreements

We have entered into agreements with Wells Capital, Wells Management, an affiliate of our General Partners, or their affiliates, whereby we pay certain fees
and expense reimbursements to Wells Capital, Wells Management, or their affiliates for asset management; the management and leasing of our properties; administrative services relating to accounting, property management, and other partnership
administration; and incur the related expenses. See Item 13, Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, for a description of these fees and reimbursements and amounts incurred and Risk Factors  Conflicts of
Interest in Item 1A. of this report.



Page 30



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

Commitments and Contingencies

Certain lease agreements include provisions that, at the option of the tenant, may obligate the Partnership to expend capital to expand an existing property or provide other expenditures for the benefit
of the tenant. Through September 30, 2010, the majority tenant at the Siemens  Orlando Building, Siemens, has the right to request the reimbursement of a tenant allowance up to approximately $237,000, which will be required to be funded
by Fund XIII-XIV Associates.



|ITEM 7A. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
|-------- | -----------------------------------------------------------

Since we do not borrow any money, make any foreign investments or invest in any market risk- sensitive instruments, we are not subject to risks relating to interest rates, foreign currency exchange rate
fluctuations, or the other market risks contemplated by Item 305 of Regulation S-K.



|ITEM 8. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.
|------- | --------------------------------------------

Our financial statements and supplementary data are detailed under Item 15 (a) and filed as part of the report on the pages indicated.



|ITEM 9. | CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.
|------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

There were no disagreements with the Partnerships independent public accountants during the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008.



|ITEM 9A(T). | CONTROL AND PROCEDURES.
|----------- | -----------------------

Evaluation of
Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management of Wells
Capital, one of our General Partners, including the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as required by Rule 13a-15(b) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as of December 31, 2009. Based upon that evaluation, which was completed as of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-K, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that our
disclosure controls and procedures were effective at December 31, 2009 in providing a reasonable level of assurance that the information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in applicable SEC rules and forms, including providing a reasonable level of assurance that the information required to be disclosed by us in such reports is accumulated
and communicated to our management, including our Principal Executive Officer and our Principal Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Management Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is
responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the
Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer and effected by our management and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with GAAP and includes those policies and procedures that:



| |  |  | pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and disposition of the assets of the
Partnership;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Page 31



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

| |  |  | provide reasonable assurance that the transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP, and
that receipts and expenditures of the Partnership are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and/or members of the Financial Oversight Committee; and
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Partnerships assets
that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over
financial reporting, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of controls, material misstatements may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. In addition, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to
future periods are subject to the risks that controls may become inadequate because of changes and conditions or that the degree of compliance with policies or procedures may deteriorate. Accordingly, even internal controls determined to be
effective can provide only reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized, and represented within the time periods required.

Our management has assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting at December 31, 2009. To make this
assessment, we used the criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting described in Internal Control  Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this
assessment, our management believes that our system of internal control over financial reporting met those criteria, and therefore our management has concluded that we maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2009.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Partnerships registered public accounting firm
regarding internal control over financial reporting. Managements report was not subject to attestation by the Partnerships registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the SEC that permit the Partnership to provide
only managements report in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There have been no significant changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2009 that have materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.



|ITEM 9B. | OTHER INFORMATION.
|-------- | ------------------

For the quarter ended
December 31, 2009, all items required to be disclosed under Form 8-K were reported under Form 8-K.



Page 32



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

PART III



|ITEM 10. | DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANTS GENERAL PARTNERS.
|-------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------

Wells Capital

Wells Capital, our corporate general partner, was formed in April 1984. The
executive offices of Wells Capital are located at 6200 The Corners Parkway, Norcross, Georgia 30092. Leo F. Wells, III is the sole Director and the President of Wells Capital. Wells Capital was organized under the Georgia Business
Corporation Code, and is primarily in the business of serving as general partner or as an affiliate of the general partner in affiliated public limited partnerships (Wells Real Estate Funds). Wells Capital or its affiliates serve as the
advisor to Wells Real Estate Investment Trust II, Inc., Wells Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., and Wells Timberland REIT, Inc. (collectively, the Wells REITs), each of which is a Maryland corporation. In these capacities, Wells
Capital performs certain services for the Wells Real Estate Funds and the Wells REITs, including presenting, structuring, and acquiring real estate investment opportunities; entering into leases and service contracts on acquired properties;
arranging for and completing the disposition of properties; and providing other services such as accounting and administrative functions. Wells Capital is a wholly owned subsidiary of WREF, of which Leo F. Wells, III is the sole
stockholder.

Leo F. Wells, III

Mr. Wells, 66, who serves as one of our General Partners, is the president, treasurer, and sole director of Wells Capital, which is our corporate general partner. He is also the sole stockholder, president, and sole director of
WREF, the parent corporation of Wells Capital, Wells Management, Wells Investment Securities, Inc. (WIS), and Wells & Associates, Inc., a real estate brokerage and investment company formed in 1976 and incorporated in 1978, for
which Mr. Wells serves as principal broker. He is also the president, treasurer, and sole director of:



| |  |  | Wells Management, our property manager;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------



| |  |  | Wells Asset Management, Inc.;
| | - |  | -----------------------------



| |  |  | Wells & Associates, Inc.; and
| | - |  | -----------------------------



| |  |  | Wells Development Corporation, a company he organized in 1997 to develop real properties.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mr. Wells is the president and a director of Wells Real Estate Investment Trust II, Inc. and Wells Real Estate Investment Trust III, Inc.,
which are public real estate programs not listed on a securities exchange. He is also the president of Wells Timberland REIT, Inc., which is also a public real estate program not listed on a securities exchange. From 1998 to 2007, Mr. Wells
served as president and Chairman of the Board of Piedmont REIT, formerly known as Wells Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., a public, nontraded REIT sponsored by WREF until April 16, 2007, when Piedmont REIT acquired certain
entities formerly affiliated with WREF and became a self-advised REIT.

Mr. Wells was a real estate salesman and property
manager from 1970 to 1973 for Roy D. Warren & Company, an Atlanta-based real estate company, and he was associated from 1973 to 1976 with Sax Gaskin Real Estate Company. From 1980 to February 1985 he served as Vice President of
Hill-Johnson, Inc., a Georgia corporation engaged in the construction business. Mr. Wells holds a Bachelor of Business Administration degree in economics from the University of Georgia. Mr. Wells is an inaugural sponsor of the Financial
Services Institute.

On August 26, 2003, Mr. Wells and WIS entered into a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent (AWC)
with the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (NASD) relating to alleged rule violations. The AWC set forth the NASDs findings that WIS and Mr. Wells had violated conduct rules relating to the provision of noncash
compensation of more than $100 to associated persons of NASD member firms in connection with their



Page 33



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

attendance at the annual educational and due diligence conferences sponsored by WIS in 2001 and 2002. Without admitting or denying the allegations and findings against them, WIS and
Mr. Wells consented in the AWC to various findings by the NASD, which are summarized in the following paragraph:

In 2001
and 2002, WIS sponsored conferences attended by registered representatives who sold its real estate investment products. WIS also paid for certain expenses of guests of the registered representatives who attended the conferences. In 2001, WIS paid
the costs of travel to the conference and meals for many of the guests, and paid the costs of playing golf for some of the registered representatives and their guests. WIS later invoiced registered representatives for the cost of golf and for travel
expenses of guests, but was not fully reimbursed for such. In 2002, WIS paid for meals for the guests. WIS also conditioned most of the 2001 conference invitations on attainment by the registered representatives of a predetermined sales goal for WIS
products. This conduct violated the prohibitions against payment and receipt of noncash compensation in connection with the sales of these products contained in NASDs Conduct Rules 2710, 2810, and 3060. In addition, WIS and Mr. Wells
failed to adhere to all of the terms of their written undertaking made in March 2001 not to engage in the conduct described above, and thereby engaged in conduct that was inconsistent with high standards of commercial honor and just and equitable
principles of trade in violation of NASD Conduct Rule 2110.

WIS consented to a censure and Mr. Wells consented to suspension from acting
in a principal capacity with an NASD member firm for one year. WIS and Mr. Wells also agreed to the imposition of a joint and several fine in the amount of $150,000. Mr. Wells one-year suspension from acting in a principal capacity
ended on October 6, 2004. Mr. Wells continues to represent certain affiliated issuers and perform nonprincipal activities on behalf of WIS.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
requires the officers and directors of our general partner, and persons who own 10% or more of any class of equity interests in the Partnership, to report their beneficial ownership of equity interests in the Partnership to the SEC. Their initial
reports are required to be filed using the SECs Form 3, and they are required to report subsequent purchases, sales, and other changes using the SECs Form 4, which must be filed within two business days of most transactions.
Officers, directors, and partners owning more than 10% of any class of equity interests in the Partnership are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all of reports they file pursuant to Section 16(a). We believe all persons
subject to these reporting requirements filed the reports on a timely basis in 2009 except as follows: The initial report on Form 3 of Kevin D. Race, an officer of Wells Capital, was not reported on a timely basis and was inadvertently filed late by
Mr. Race.

Financial Oversight Committee

The Partnership does not have a board of directors or an audit committee. Accordingly, as our corporate general partner, Wells Capital, has established a Financial Oversight Committee consisting of
Douglas P. Williams, as the Principal Financial Officer; Randall D. Fretz, as the Senior Vice President of our corporate general partner; and Kevin Race, as Chief of Financial Strategy. The Financial Oversight Committee serves the equivalent
function of an audit committee for, among others, the following purposes: appointment, compensation, review and oversight of the work of our independent registered public accountants, and establishing and enforcing the code of ethics. However, since
neither the Partnership nor its corporate general partner has an audit committee and the Financial Oversight Committee is not independent of the Partnership or the General Partners, we do not have an audit committee financial expert.

Code of Ethics

The
Partnership has adopted a code of ethics applicable to our corporate general partners Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, as well as the principal accounting officer, controller or other employees



Page 34



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

of our corporate general partner performing similar functions on behalf of the Partnership, if any. The code of ethics is contained in the Business Standards/Code of Conduct/General Policies
established by WREF. You may obtain a copy of this code of ethics, without charge, upon request by calling our Client Services Department at 800-557-4830 or 770-243-8282.



|ITEM 11. | COMPENSATION OF GENERAL PARTNERS AND AFFILIATES.
|-------- | ------------------------------------------------

While the Partnership is managed by the General Partners and their affiliates, it does not pay any salaries or other compensation directly to the General Partners or to any of the General Partners individual employees, officers, or
directors. Further, the Partnership does not employ, and is not managed by, any of its own employees, officers, or directors. Accordingly, no compensation has been awarded to, earned by, or paid to any such individuals in connection with the
operation or management of the Partnership. Due to our current management structure and our lack of any employees, officers, or directors, no discussion and analysis of compensation paid by the Partnership, tabular information concerning salaries,
bonuses, and other types of compensation to executive officers or directors of the Partnership, or other information regarding compensation policies and practices of the Partnership has been included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

See Item 13, Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, for a description of the fees incurred by the Partnership payable to
affiliates of the General Partners during the year ended December 31, 2009.



|ITEM 12. | SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT.
|-------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------



|(a) | No limited partner is known by the Partnership to own beneficially more than 5% of any class of the outstanding units of the Partnership.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) | Set forth below is the security ownership of management as of February 28, 2010.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                          |  |                         |  |                                          |  |                
|------------------------- |  | ----------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------- |  | ---------------
|Title of Class            |  | Name ofBeneficial Owner |  | Amount and Nature ofBeneficial Ownership |  | Percent ofClass
|Limited Partnership Units |  | Leo F. Wells, III       |  | 2,095.945 Units(1)                       |  | Less than 1%   



| | (1) | Leo F. Wells, III owns 2,095.945 Cash Preferred Units through an individual retirement account.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(c) | No arrangements exist which would, upon operation, result in a change in control of the Partnership.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|ITEM 13. | CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS.
|-------- | -----------------------------------------------

The compensation and fees we pay to our General Partners or their affiliates in connection with our operations are as follows:

Interest in Partnership Cash Flow and Net Sales Proceeds

The General Partners are entitled to receive a subordinated
participation in net cash flow from operations equal to 10% of net cash flow after the limited partners holding Cash Preferred Units have received preferential distributions equal to 10% of their adjusted capital accounts in each fiscal year. The
General Partners are also entitled to receive a subordinated participation in net sales proceeds and net financing proceeds equal to 20% of residual proceeds available for distribution after limited partners holding Cash Preferred Units have
received a return of their adjusted capital contributions plus a 10% cumulative return on their adjusted capital contributions, and limited partners holding Tax Preferred Units have received a return of their adjusted capital contributions plus a
15% cumulative return on their adjusted capital contributions; provided, however, that in no event shall the General Partners receive in the aggregate in excess of 15% of net sales proceeds and net financing proceeds remaining after payments to
limited partners from such proceeds of amounts equal to the sum of their adjusted capital contributions plus a 6% cumulative return on their adjusted capital contributions. The General Partners did not receive any distributions of net cash from
operations or net sales proceeds during the year ended December 31, 2009.



Page 35



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

Management and Leasing Fees

We have entered into a property management, leasing, and asset management agreement with Wells Management, an affiliate of the General Partners. In accordance with the property management and leasing
agreement, Wells Management receives compensation for the management and leasing of the Partnerships properties, owned directly or through the Joint Ventures, equal to the lesser of (a) fees that would be paid to a comparable outside
firm, that is assessed periodically based on market studies, or (b) 4.5% of the gross revenues collected monthly; plus, a separate competitive fee for the one-time initial lease-up of newly constructed properties generally paid in conjunction
with the receipt of the first months rent. In the case of commercial properties leased on a long-term net-lease basis (ten or more years), the maximum property management fee from such leases shall be 1% of the gross revenues generally paid
over the life of the leases except for a one-time initial leasing fee of 3% of the gross revenues on each lease payable over the first five full years of the original lease term. Management and leasing fees are paid by the Joint Ventures and,
accordingly, are included in equity in income of joint ventures in the accompanying statements of operations. Our share of management and leasing fees and lease acquisition costs incurred through the Joint Ventures that are payable to Wells
Management is $27,904, $26,829, and $49,669 for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively.

Administrative
Reimbursements

Wells Capital, one of the our General Partners, and Wells Management perform certain administrative services for the
Partnership, relating to accounting, property management and other partnership administration, and incur the related expenses. Such expenses are allocated among other entities affiliated with the General Partners based on time spent on each fund by
individual administrative personnel. In the opinion of the General Partners, this allocation is a reasonable estimation of such expenses. We incurred administrative expenses of $98,145, $95,318, and $82,610 payable to Wells Capital and Wells
Management for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively.

Real Estate Commissions

In connection with the sale of our properties, the General Partners or their affiliates may receive commissions not exceeding the lesser of (a) 50% of
the commissions customarily charged by other brokers in arms-length transactions involving comparable properties in the same geographic area or (b) 3% of the gross sales price of the property, and provided that payments of such
commissions will be made only after limited partners have received prior distributions totaling 100% of their capital contributions plus a 6% cumulative return on their adjusted capital contributions. No real estate commissions were paid to the
General Partners or affiliates for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, or 2007.

Procedures Regarding Related-Party Transactions

Our policies and procedures governing related-party transactions with our General Partners and their affiliates, including, but not
limited to, all transactions required to be disclosed under Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K, are restricted or severely limited by the provisions of Articles XI, XII, XIII, and XIV of our partnership agreement, which has been filed with the SEC.
No transaction has been entered into with either of our General Partners or their affiliates that does not comply with those policies and procedures. In addition, in any transaction involving a potential conflict of interest, including any
transaction that would require disclosure under Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K, our General Partners must view such a transaction after taking into consideration their fiduciary duties to the Partnership.



|ITEM 14. | PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES.
|-------- | ---------------------------------------

Preapproval Policies and Procedures

The Financial Oversight Committee preapproves all auditing and permissible nonauditing
services provided by our independent registered public accountants. The approval may be given as part of the Financial Oversight



Page 36



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

Committees approval of the scope of the engagement of our independent registered public accountants or on an individual basis. The preapproval of certain audit-related services and certain
nonauditing services not exceeding enumerated dollar limits may be delegated to one or more of the Financial Oversight Committees members, but the member to whom such authority is delegated shall report any preapproval decisions to the full
Financial Oversight Committee. Our independent registered public accountants may not be retained to perform the nonauditing services specified in Section 10A(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Fees Paid to the Independent Registered Public Accountants

Frazier & Deeter, LLC serves as our independent registered public accountants and has provided audit services since September 22, 2006. All such fees are recognized in the period
to which the services relate. A portion of such fees is allocated to the joint ventures in which the Partnership invests. The aggregate fees billed to the Partnership for professional accounting services by Frazier & Deeter, LLC, including
the audit of the Partnerships annual financial statements, for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, are set forth in the table below.



|                   |  |                       |        |      |   |       
|------------------ |  | --------------------- | ------ | ---- | - | ------
|                   |  | Frazier & Deeter, LLC
|                   |  | 2009                  |        | 2008
|Audit Fees         |  | $                     | 32,321 |      | $ | 31,222
|Audit-Related Fees |  |                       | 0      |      |   | 0     
|Tax Fees           |  |                       | 0      |      |   | 0     
|Other Fees         |  |                       | 0      |      |   | 0     
|                   |  |                       |        |      |   |       
|Total              |  | $                     | 32,321 |      | $ | 31,222
|                   |  |                       |        |      |   |       

For purposes of the preceding table, the professional fees are
classified as follows:



| |  |  | Audit Fees  These are fees for professional services performed for the audit of our annual financial statements and review of financial
statements included in our Form 10-Q filings, services that are normally provided by independent registered public accountants in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements, and services that generally independent registered
public accountants reasonably can provide, such as statutory audits, attest services, consents, and assistance with and review of documents filed with the SEC.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Audit-Related Fees  These are fees for assurance and related services that traditionally are performed by independent registered public
accountants, such as due diligence related to acquisitions and dispositions, internal control reviews, attestation services that are not required by statute or regulation, and consultation concerning financial accounting and reporting standards.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Tax Fees  These are fees for all professional services performed by professional staff in our independent registered public accountants tax
division, except those services related to the audit of our financial statements. These include fees for tax compliance, tax planning, and tax advice. Tax compliance involves preparation of any federal, state or local tax returns. Tax planning and
tax advice encompass a diverse range of services, including assistance with tax audits and appeals, tax advice related to acquisitions and dispositions of assets, and requests for rulings or technical advice from taxing authorities.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Other Fees  These are fees for other permissible work performed that do not meet the above-described categories, including assistance with
internal audit plans and risk assessments.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, 100% of the
services performed by Frazier & Deeter, LLC described above under the captions Audit Fees, Audit-Related Fees, Tax Fees, and Other Fees were approved in advance by a member of the
Financial Oversight Committee. In addition, fees were incurred for tax services performed by an accounting firm separate from the Partnerships independent registered public accountants in each year presented.



Page 37



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

PART IV



|ITEM 15. | EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.
|-------- | -------------------------------------------



|(a)1. | The financial statements are contained on pages F-2 through F-45 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and the list of the financial statements contained herein is
set forth on page F-1, which is hereby incorporated by reference.
|----- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) | The Exhibits filed in response to Item 601 of Regulation S-K are listed on the Exhibit Index attached hereto.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(c) | See (a) 1 above.
|--- | ----------------



Page 38



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.



|               |  |  |  |                                                                                                   |  |                    
|-------------- |  |  |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------
|               |  |  |  | WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND XIII, L.P. (Registrant)                                                   
|               |  |  | 
|               |  |  |  | By:                                                                                               |  | WELLS CAPITAL, INC.
|               |  |  |  |                                                                                                   |  | (General Partner)  
|               |  | 
|March 18, 2010 |  |  |  | /S/    LEO F.
WELLS, III                                                                         
|               |  |  |  | Leo F. Wells, III President, Principal Executive Officer,and Sole Director of Wells Capital, Inc.
|               |  | 
|March 18, 2010 |  |  |  | /S/    DOUGLAS P.
WILLIAMS                                                                       
|               |  |  |  | Douglas P. Williams Principal Financial Officer of Wells Capital, Inc.                           



Page 39



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND XIII, L.P.



TABLE OF CONTENTS



|                                                                                      |  |     
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----
|FINANCIAL STATEMENTS                                                                  |  | Page
|                                                                                      | 
|WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND XIII, L.P.                                                     |  |     
|Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm  Frazier & Deeter,
LLC       |  | F-2 
|Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2009 and 2008                                       |  | F-3 
|Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007        |  | F-4 
|Statements of Partners Capital for the Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and
2007 |  | F-5 
|Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007        |  | F-6 
|Notes to Financial Statements                                                         |  | F-7 
|                                                                                      | 
|WELLS FUND XIII-REIT JOINT VENTURE PARTNERSHIP                                        |  |     
|Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm  Frazier & Deeter,
LLC       |  | F-18
|Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2009 and 2008                                       |  | F-19
|Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007        |  | F-20
|Statements of Partners Capital for the Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and
2007 |  | F-21
|Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007        |  | F-22
|Notes to Financial Statements                                                         |  | F-23
|Schedule III  Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization              |  | F-30
|                                                                                      | 
|FUND XIII AND FUND XIV ASSOCIATES                                                     |  |     
|Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm  Frazier & Deeter,
LLC       |  | F-32
|Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2009 and 2008                                       |  | F-33
|Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2009, 2008, 2007              |  | F-34
|Statement of Partners Capital for the year ended December 31, 2009, 2008,
2007       |  | F-35
|Statement of Cash Flows for the year ended December 31, 2009, 2008, 2007              |  | F-36
|Notes to Financial Statements                                                         |  | F-37
|Schedule III  Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization              |  | F-44



Page F-1



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



The General Partners of

Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P.

We have audited
the accompanying balance sheets of Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P. (the Partnership) as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related statements of operations, partners capital, and cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 2009. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnerships management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we
plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Partnerships internal control over financial reporting. Our
audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the
Partnerships internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Wells Real Estate Fund XIII,
L.P. as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

/s/    Frazier & Deeter, LLC

Atlanta, Georgia

March 18, 2010



Page F-2



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND XIII, L.P.



BALANCE SHEETS

DECEMBER 31, 2009 AND 2008

ASSETS



|                             |  |      |            |      |   |           
|---------------------------- |  | ---- | ---------- | ---- | - | ----------
|                             |  | 2009 |            | 2008
|Investment in joint ventures |  | $    | 12,062,058 |      | $ | 12,711,362
|Cash and cash equivalents    |  |      | 1,519,750  |      |   | 530,337   
|Due from joint ventures      |  |      | 368,923    |      |   | 361,560   
|Other assets                 |  |      | 0          |      |   | 200       
|                             |  |      |            |      |   |           
|Total assets                 |  | $    | 13,950,731 |      | $ | 13,603,459
|                             |  |      |            |      |   |           

LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS CAPITAL



|                                                        |  |   |            |  |   |           
|------------------------------------------------------- |  | - | ---------- |  | - | ----------
|Liabilities:                                            |  |   |            |  |   |           
|Accounts payable and accrued expenses                   |  | $ | 25,584     |  | $ | 35,484    
|Due to affiliates                                       |  |   | 10,875     |  |   | 8,340     
|                                                        |  |   |            |  |   |           
|Total liabilities                                       |  |   | 36,459     |  |   | 43,824    
|                                                        |  |  
|Commitment and contingencies                            |  |   |            |  |   |           
|                                                        |  |  
|Partners capital:                                      |  |   |            |  |   |           
|Limited partners:                                       |  |   |            |  |   |           
|Cash Preferred  3,215,584 units issued and outstanding |  |   | 13,908,070 |  |   | 13,556,979
|Tax Preferred  556,464 units issued and outstanding    |  |   | 0          |  |   | 0         
|General partners                                        |  |   | 6,202      |  |   | 2,656     
|                                                        |  |   |            |  |   |           
|Total partners capital                                 |  |   | 13,914,272 |  |   | 13,559,635
|                                                        |  |   |            |  |   |           
|Total liabilities and partners capital                 |  | $ | 13,950,731 |  | $ | 13,603,459
|                                                        |  |   |            |  |   |           

See accompanying notes.



Page F-3



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND XIII, L.P.



STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED

DECEMBER 31, 2009, 2008, AND 2007



|                                                      |  |      |           |      |   |           |  |   |          
|----------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | --------- | ---- | - | --------- |  | - | ---------
|                                                      |  | 2009 |           | 2008 |   | 2007     
|EQUITY IN INCOME OF JOINT VENTURES                    |  | $    | 786,177   |      | $ | 573,477   |  | $ | 3,026,738
|                                                      |  |      |          
|INTEREST AND OTHER INCOME                             |  |      | 0         |      |   | 931       |  |   | 203,616  
|                                                      |  |      |          
|GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE                            |  |      | 159,254   |      |   | 181,724   |  |   | 163,822  
|                                                      |  |      |           |      |   |           |  |   |          
|NET INCOME                                            |  | $    | 626,923   |      | $ | 392,684   |  | $ | 3,066,532
|                                                      |  |      |           |      |   |           |  |   |          
|                                                      |  |      |          
|NET INCOME ALLOCATED TO:                              |  |      |           |      |   |           |  |   |          
|CASH PREFERRED LIMITED PARTNERS                       |  | $    | 623,377   |      | $ | 390,028   |  | $ | 1,290,150
|                                                      |  |      |           |      |   |           |  |   |          
|TAX PREFERRED LIMITED PARTNERS                        |  | $    | 0         |      | $ | 0         |  | $ | 1,776,382
|                                                      |  |      |           |      |   |           |  |   |          
|GENERAL PARTNERS                                      |  | $    | 3,546     |      | $ | 2,656     |  | $ | 0        
|                                                      |  |      |           |      |   |           |  |   |          
|NET INCOME PER WEIGHTED-AVERAGE LIMITED PARTNER UNIT: |  |      |           |      |   |           |  |   |          
|CASH PREFERRED                                        |  |      | $0.19     |      |   | $0.12     |  |   | $0.40    
|                                                      |  |      |           |      |   |           |  |   |          
|TAX PREFERRED                                         |  |      | $0.00     |      |   | $0.00     |  |   | $3.17    
|                                                      |  |      |           |      |   |           |  |   |          
|WEIGHTED-AVERAGE LIMITED PARTNER UNITS OUTSTANDING:   |  |      |           |      |   |           |  |   |          
|CASH PREFERRED                                        |  |      | 3,215,584 |      |   | 3,214,484 |  |   | 3,211,653
|                                                      |  |      |           |      |   |           |  |   |          
|TAX PREFERRED                                         |  |      | 556,464   |      |   | 557,564   |  |   | 560,395  
|                                                      |  |      |           |      |   |           |  |   |          

See accompanying notes.



Page F-4



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND XIII, L.P.



STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS CAPITAL

FOR THE YEARS ENDED

DECEMBER 31, 2009, 2008, AND 2007



|                                                                                                                                  |                |                  |   |               |                 |            |                       |  |         |        |  |   |            |   |  |   |       |  |   |            |  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------------- | ---------------- | - | ------------- | --------------- | ---------- | --------------------- |  | ------- | ------ |  | - | ---------- | - |  | - | ----- |  | - | ---------- | -
|                                                                                                                                  |                | Limited Partners |   |               | GeneralPartners |            | TotalPartnersCapital | 
|                                                                                                                                  | Cash Preferred |                  |   | Tax Preferred |                 |            |                      
|                                                                                                                                  | Units          |                  |   | Amount        |                 |            | Units                 |  |         | Amount |  |   |           
|BALANCE, December 31, 2006                                                                                                        |                | 3,220,631        |   |               | $               | 20,445,966 |                       |  | 551,417 |        |  | $ | 0          |   |  | $ | 0     |  | $ | 20,445,966 |  
|                                                                                                                                  |                |                  |   |               |                 |           
|Cash Preferred conversion elections                                                                                               |                | (9,247           | ) |               |                 | (58,701    | )                     |  | 9,247   |        |  |   | 58,701     |   |  |   | 0     |  |   | 0          |  
|Net income                                                                                                                        |                | 0                |   |               |                 | 1,290,150  |                       |  | 0       |        |  |   | 1,776,382  |   |  |   | 0     |  |   | 3,066,532  |  
|Distributions of operating cash flow($0.48 per weighted-average Cash Preferred Unit)                                              |                | 0                |   |               |                 | (1,527,253 | )                     |  | 0       |        |  |   | 0          |   |  |   | 0     |  |   | (1,527,253 | )
|Distributions of net sale proceeds($2.05 and $3.27 per weighted-average Cash Preferred Unit and Tax
Preferred Unit, respectively) |                | 0                |   |               |                 | (6,574,917 | )                     |  | 0       |        |  |   | (1,835,083 | ) |  |   | 0     |  |   | (8,410,000 | )
|                                                                                                                                  |                |                  |   |               |                 |            |                       |  |         |        |  |   |            |   |  |   |       |  |   |            |  
|BALANCE, December 31, 2007                                                                                                        |                | 3,211,384        |   |               |                 | 13,575,245 |                       |  | 560,664 |        |  |   | 0          |   |  |   | 0     |  |   | 13,575,245 |  
|                                                                                                                                  |                |                  |   |               |                 |           
|Cash Preferred conversion elections                                                                                               |                | 4,200            |   |               |                 | 0          |                       |  | (4,200  | )      |  |   | 0          |   |  |   | 0     |  |   | 0          |  
|Net income                                                                                                                        |                | 0                |   |               |                 | 390,028    |                       |  | 0       |        |  |   | 0          |   |  |   | 2,656 |  |   | 392,684    |  
|Distributions of operating cash flow($0.13 per weighted-average Cash Preferred Unit)                                              |                | 0                |   |               |                 | (408,294   | )                     |  | 0       |        |  |   | 0          |   |  |   | 0     |  |   | (408,294   | )
|                                                                                                                                  |                |                  |   |               |                 |            |                       |  |         |        |  |   |            |   |  |   |       |  |   |            |  
|BALANCE, December 31, 2008                                                                                                        |                | 3,215,584        |   |               |                 | 13,556,979 |                       |  | 556,464 |        |  |   | 0          |   |  |   | 2,656 |  |   | 13,559,635 |  
|                                                                                                                                  |                |                  |   |               |                 |           
|Net income                                                                                                                        |                | 0                |   |               |                 | 623,377    |                       |  | 0       |        |  |   | 0          |   |  |   | 3,546 |  |   | 626,923    |  
|Distributions of operating cash flow ($0.08 per weighted-average Cash Preferred Unit)                                             |                | 0                |   |               |                 | (272,286   | )                     |  | 0       |        |  |   | 0          |   |  |   | 0     |  |   | (272,286   | )
|                                                                                                                                  |                |                  |   |               |                 |            |                       |  |         |        |  |   |            |   |  |   |       |  |   |            |  
|BALANCE, December 31, 2009                                                                                                        |                | 3,215,584        |   |               | $               | 13,908,070 |                       |  | 556,464 |        |  | $ | 0          |   |  | $ | 6,202 |  | $ | 13,914,272 |  
|                                                                                                                                  |                |                  |   |               |                 |            |                       |  |         |        |  |   |            |   |  |   |       |  |   |            |  

See accompanying notes.



Page F-5



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND XIII, L.P.



STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED

DECEMBER 31, 2009, 2008, AND 2007



|                                                                                           |  |      |           |   |      |   |           |      |  |   |             |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ---- | --------- | - | ---- | - | --------- | ---- |  | - | ----------- | -
|                                                                                           |  | 2009 |           |   | 2008 |   |           | 2007 | 
|CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:                                                      |  |      |           |   |      |   |           |      |  |   |             |  
|Net income                                                                                 |  | $    | 626,923   |   |      | $ | 392,684   |      |  | $ | 3,066,532   |  
|Operating distributions received from joint ventures                                       |  |      | 1,428,118 |   |      |   | 1,380,682 |      |  |   | 1,740,232   |  
|Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:          |  |      |           |   |      |   |           |      |  |   |             |  
|Equity in income of joint ventures                                                         |  |      | (786,177  | ) |      |   | (573,477  | )    |  |   | (3,026,738  | )
|Operating changes in assets and liabilities:                                               |  |      |           |   |      |   |           |      |  |   |             |  
|Decrease (increase) in other assets                                                        |  |      | 200       |   |      |   | (8        | )    |  |   | 0           |  
|Decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses                                          |  |      | (9,900    | ) |      |   | (7,546    | )    |  |   | (1,734      | )
|Increase in due to affiliates                                                              |  |      | 2,535     |   |      |   | 1,446     |      |  |   | 728         |  
|                                                                                           |  |      |           |   |      |   |           |      |  |   |             |  
|Net cash provided by operating activities                                                  |  |      | 1,261,699 |   |      |   | 1,193,781 |      |  |   | 1,779,020   |  
|                                                                                           |  |      |          
|CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:                                                      |  |      |           |   |      |   |           |      |  |   |             |  
|Investments in joint ventures                                                              |  |      | 0         |   |      |   | (63,293   | )    |  |   | (32,128     | )
|Net sale proceeds received from joint ventures                                             |  |      | 0         |   |      |   | 0         |      |  |   | 8,379,517   |  
|                                                                                           |  |      |           |   |      |   |           |      |  |   |             |  
|Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities                                        |  |      | 0         |   |      |   | (63,293   | )    |  |   | 8,347,389   |  
|                                                                                           |  |      |          
|CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:                                                      |  |      |           |   |      |   |           |      |  |   |             |  
|Net sale proceeds distributions paid to limited partners                                   |  |      | 0         |   |      |   | 0         |      |  |   | (8,410,000  | )
|Operating distributions paid to limited partners from accumulated operating income         |  |      | 0         |   |      |   | (206,129  | )    |  |   | (1,701,876  | )
|Operating distributions paid to limited partners in excess of accumulated operating income |  |      | (272,286  | ) |      |   | (492,348  | )    |  |   | 0           |  
|                                                                                           |  |      |           |   |      |   |           |      |  |   |             |  
|Net cash used in financing activities                                                      |  |      | (272,286  | ) |      |   | (698,477  | )    |  |   | (10,111,876 | )
|                                                                                           |  |      |           |   |      |   |           |      |  |   |             |  
|NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS                                                  |  |      | 989,413   |   |      |   | 432,011   |      |  |   | 14,533      |  
|                                                                                           |  |      |          
|CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of year                                               |  |      | 530,337   |   |      |   | 98,326    |      |  |   | 83,793      |  
|                                                                                           |  |      |           |   |      |   |           |      |  |   |             |  
|CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of year                                                     |  | $    | 1,519,750 |   |      | $ | 530,337   |      |  | $ | 98,326      |  
|                                                                                           |  |      |           |   |      |   |           |      |  |   |             |  
|                                                                                           |  |      |          
|SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:                     |  |      |           |   |      |   |           |      |  |   |             |  
|Partnership distributions payable                                                          |  | $    | 0         |   |      | $ | 0         |      |  | $ | 290,183     |  
|                                                                                           |  |      |           |   |      |   |           |      |  |   |             |  

See accompanying notes.



Page F-6



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND XIII, L.P.



NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2009, 2008, AND 2007



|1. | ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS
|-- | -------------------------

Wells Real
Estate Fund XIII, L.P. (the Partnership) is a Georgia public limited partnership with Leo F. Wells, III and Wells Capital, Inc. (Wells Capital), a Georgia corporation, serving as its general partners (collectively, the
General Partners). Wells Capital is a wholly owned subsidiary of Wells Real Estate Funds, Inc. Leo F. Wells, III is the president and sole director of Wells Capital and the president, sole director, and sole owner of Wells Real
Estate Funds, Inc. The Partnership was formed on September 15, 1998 for the purpose of acquiring, developing, owning, operating, improving, leasing, and managing income-producing commercial properties for investment purposes. Upon subscription,
limited partners elected to have their units treated as Cash Preferred Units or Tax Preferred Units. Thereafter, limited partners have the right to change their prior elections to have some or all of their units treated as Cash Preferred Units or
Tax Preferred Units one time during each quarterly accounting period. Limited Partners may vote to, among other things: (a) amend the Partnership agreement, subject to certain limitations; (b) change the business purpose or investment
objectives of the Partnership, (c) add or remove a general partner; (d) elect a new general partner; (e) dissolve the Partnership; and (f) approve a sale involving all or substantially all of the Partnerships assets,
subject to certain limitations. The majority vote on any of the described matters will bind the Partnership, without the concurrence of the General Partners. Each limited partnership unit has equal voting rights, regardless of which class of unit is
selected.

On March 29, 2001, the Partnership commenced an offering of up to $45,000,000 of Cash Preferred or Tax Preferred limited
partnership units ($10.00 per unit) pursuant to a Registration Statement filed on Form S-11 under the Securities Act of 1933. The offering was terminated on March 28, 2003, at which time the Partnership had sold approximately 3,023,371 Cash
Preferred Units and 748,678 Tax Preferred Units representing total limited partner capital contributions of $37,720,487.

The Partnership owns
indirect interests in all of its real estate assets through joint ventures with other entities affiliated with the General Partners and Piedmont Operating Partnership, LP (Piedmont OP), formerly known as Wells Operating Partnership, L.P.
Piedmont OP is a Delaware limited partnership with Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc. (Piedmont REIT), formerly known as Wells Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., serving as its general partner. Piedmont REIT is a Maryland corporation
that qualifies as a real estate investment trust. During the periods presented, the Partnership owned interests in the following joint ventures (the Joint Ventures) and properties:



|                                                                             |  |                                                                        |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                    
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Joint Venture                                                                |  | Joint Venture Partners                                                 |  | Properties                                                                                                                                                                                         
|Wells Fund XIII-REIT Joint Venture
Partnership (Fund XIII-REIT Associates) |  | Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P.
Piedmont Operating Partnership, LP |  | 1. 8560 Upland Drive Two connected one-story office and assembly buildings located in Parker, Colorado  2. AIU  Chicago Building
A four-story office building located in Hoffman Estates, Illinois



Page F-7



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

|                                                               |  |                                                                      |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                  
|-------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Joint Venture                                                  |  | Joint Venture Partners                                               |  | Properties                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|Fund XIII and Fund XIV Associates (Fund XIII-XIV Associates) |  | Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P.
Wells Real Estate Fund XIV, L.P. |  | 3. Siemens  Orlando Building Two single-story office buildings located in Orlando, Florida  4. Randstad  Atlanta
Building(1) A four-story office building located in Atlanta, Georgia  5. 7500 Setzler Parkway(2) A one-story office and warehouse building located in Brooklyn Park, Minnesota



| | (1) | This property was sold in April 2007.
| | --- | -------------------------------------



| | (2) | This property was sold in January 2007.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------

Wells Real Estate Fund XIV, L.P. is affiliated with the Partnership through common general partners. Each of the properties described above was acquired on an all-cash basis.



|2. | SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|-- | ------------------------------------------

Basis of Presentation

The Partnerships financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles (GAAP).

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the Partnerships financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues,
and expenses and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Investment in Joint Ventures

The Partnership has evaluated the Joint Ventures and
concluded that none are variable interest entities. The Partnership does not have control over the operations of the Joint Ventures; however, it does exercise significant influence. Approval by the Partnership as well as the other joint venture
partners is required for any major decision or any action that would materially affect the Joint Ventures, or their real property investments. Accordingly, the Partnership accounts for its investments in the Joint Ventures using the equity method of
accounting, whereby original investments are recorded at cost and subsequently adjusted for contributions, distributions, and net income (loss) attributable to the Partnership. Pursuant to the terms of the joint venture agreements, all income (loss)
and distributions are allocated to joint venture partners in accordance with their respective ownership interests. Distributions of net cash from operations, if available, are generally distributed to the joint venture partners on a quarterly basis.

Evaluating the Recoverability of Real Estate Assets

The Partnership continually monitors events and changes in circumstances that could indicate that the carrying amounts of the real estate assets owned through the Partnerships investment in the
Joint Ventures may not be recoverable. When indicators of potential impairment are present which suggest that the carrying amounts of real estate assets may not be recoverable, management assesses the recoverability of the real estate assets by
determining whether the respective carrying values will be recovered through the estimated undiscounted future operating cash flows expected from the use of the assets and their eventual disposition for assets held for use, or



Page F-8



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

with the estimated fair values, less costs to sell, for assets held for sale. In the event that the expected undiscounted future cash flows for assets held for use, or the estimated fair value,
less costs to sell, for assets held for sale do not exceed the respective asset carrying value, management adjusts the real estate assets to their respective estimated fair values, pursuant to the provisions of the property, plant, and equipment
accounting standard for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets, and recognizes an impairment loss. Estimated fair values are determined based on the following information, dependent upon availability: (i) recently quoted market
price(s) for the subject property, or highly comparable properties, under sufficiently active and normal market conditions, or (ii) the present value of future cash flows, including estimated residual value.

While various techniques and assumptions can be used to estimate fair value depending on the nature of the asset or liability, the accounting standard for
fair value measurements and disclosures describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Partnership has the
ability to access. Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs may include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in
active markets, as well as inputs that are observable for the asset or liability (other than quoted prices), such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals. Level 3 inputs are
unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, which is typically based on an entitys own assumptions, as there is little, if any, related market activity or information. In instances where the determination of the fair value measurement is
based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its
entirety. The Partnerships assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the asset or liability. The accounting standard for fair value
measurements and disclosures was applied to the Partnerships outstanding nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities effective January 1, 2009.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Partnership considers all highly liquid investments
purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents include cash and short-term investments. Short-term investments are stated at cost, which approximates fair value, and consist of investments in
money market accounts.

Other Assets

As of December 31, 2008, other assets is comprised of interest income receivable. Interest receivable represents interest earned during the period presented, which will be received in the following month.

Distribution of Net Cash from Operations

Net cash from operations, if available, is generally distributed quarterly to the limited partners as follows:



| |  |  | First, to all Cash Preferred limited partners on a per-unit basis until such limited partners have received distributions equal to a 10% per annum
return on their respective net capital contributions, as defined.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Second, to the General Partners until the General Partners have received distributions equal to 10% of the total cumulative distributions paid by the
Partnership.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Third, to the Cash Preferred limited partners on a per-unit basis and the General Partners allocated on a basis of 90% and 10%, respectively.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

No distributions of net cash from operations will be made to limited partners holding Tax Preferred Units.



Page F-9



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

Distribution of Net Sale Proceeds

Upon the sale of properties, unless reserved, net sale proceeds will be distributed in the following order:



| |  |  | In the event that the particular property sold is sold for a price that is less than its original property purchase price, to the limited partners
holding Cash Preferred Units until they have received an amount equal to the excess of the original property purchase price over the price for which the property was sold, limited to the amount of depreciation, amortization, and cost recovery
deductions taken by the limited partners holding Tax Preferred Units with respect to such property;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | To limited partners holding units which at any time have been treated as Tax Preferred Units until the limited partners have received an amount
necessary to equal the net cash from operations previously received by the limited partners holding Cash Preferred Units on a per-unit basis;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | To all limited partners on a per-unit basis until the limited partners have received 100% of their respective net capital contributions, as defined;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | To all limited partners on a per-unit basis until the limited partners have received a cumulative 10% per annum return on their respective net
capital contributions, as defined;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | To limited partners on a per-unit basis until the limited partners have received an amount equal to their respective preferential limited partner
returns (defined as the sum of a 10% per annum cumulative return on net capital contributions for all periods during which the units were treated as Cash Preferred Units and a 15% per annum cumulative return on net capital contributions
for all periods during which the units were treated as Tax Preferred Units);
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | To the General Partners until they have received 100% of their respective capital contributions, as defined;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Then, if limited partners have received any excess limited partner distributions (defined as distributions to limited partners over the life of their
investment in the Partnership in excess of their net capital contributions, as defined, plus their preferential limited partner return), to the General Partners until they have received distributions equal to 20% of the sum of any such excess
limited partner distributions plus distributions made to the General Partners pursuant to this provision; and
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Thereafter, 80% to the limited partners on a per-unit basis and 20% to the General Partners.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Allocations of Net Income, Net Loss, and Gain on Sale

For the purpose of determining allocations per the partnership agreement, net income is defined as net income recognized by the Partnership, excluding deductions for depreciation, amortization, cost
recovery, and the gain on sale of assets. Net income, as defined, of the Partnership is generally allocated each year in the same proportion that net cash from operations is distributed to the partners holding Cash Preferred Units and to the General
Partner. To the extent the Partnerships net income in any year exceeds net cash from operations, it will be allocated 99% to the limited partners holding Cash Preferred Units and 1% to the General Partners.

Net loss, depreciation, and amortization deductions for each fiscal year will be allocated as follows: (a) 99% to the limited partners holding Tax
Preferred Units and 1% to the General Partners until their capital accounts are reduced to zero; (b) then, to any partner having a positive balance in his capital account in an amount not to exceed such positive balance; and
(c) thereafter, to the General Partners.

Gain on the sale or exchange of the Partnerships properties will be allocated generally
in the same manner that the net proceeds from such sale are distributed to partners after the following allocations are made, if applicable: (a) allocations made pursuant to the qualified income offset provisions of the partnership agreement;
(b) allocations to partners having negative capital accounts until all negative capital accounts have been restored to zero; and (c) allocations to limited partners holding Tax Preferred Units in amounts equal to the deductions for
depreciation and amortization previously allocated to them with respect to the specific partnership property sold, but not in excess of the amount of gain on sale recognized by the Partnership with respect to the sale of such property.



Page F-10



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

Income Taxes

The Partnership is not subject to federal or state income taxes; therefore, none have been provided for in the accompanying financial statements. The partners are required to include their respective
shares of profits and losses in their individual income tax returns.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 168,
The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (SFAS 168). SFAS 168 requires that the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the Codification or
ASC) become the source of authoritative U.S. GAAP recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Once the Codification is in effect, all of its content will carry the same level of authority, effectively superseding
SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. SFAS 168 is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of SFAS 168 did not have a
significant impact on the Partnerships financial statements or disclosures.

In September 2006, FASB issued ASC Topic Fair Value
Measurements and Disclosures (ASC 820), which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures required for fair value measurements under GAAP. ASC 820 emphasizes that fair value is a
market-based measurement, as opposed to an entity-specific measurement. In February 2008, the FASB delayed the effective date of ASC 820 for all nonrecurring nonfinancial assets and liabilities until fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2008. The Partnership adopted the guidelines under ASC 820 effective January 1, 2008, as it relates to financial instruments and effective January 1, 2009, as it relates to nonfinancial instruments. The adoption of ASC
820 for nonrecurring nonfinancial assets and liabilities did not have a material impact on the Partnerships financial statements or disclosures.

In May 2009, the FASB issued ASC Topic Subsequent Events(ASC 855). ASC 855 provides guidance on managements assessment of subsequent events. ASC 855 states that management must evaluate, as of each reporting
period, events or transactions that occur after the balance sheet date through the date that the financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. ASC 855 allows the assessment of subsequent events to occur through the date
on which the financial statements are available to be issued or the date they are issued. Management must perform its assessment for both interim and annual financial reporting periods. ASC 855 was effective prospectively for interim and
annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of ASC 855 did not have a material impact on the Partnerships financial statements or disclosures.



|3. | INVESTMENT IN JOINT VENTURES
|-- | ----------------------------

Due from
Joint Ventures

As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, due from joint ventures represents the Partnerships share of operating cash
flow to be distributed for the fourth quarters of 2009 and 2008, respectively, from the Joint Ventures:



|                          |  |      |         |      |   |        
|------------------------- |  | ---- | ------- | ---- | - | -------
|                          |  | 2009 |         | 2008
|Fund XIII-REIT Associates |  | $    | 232,347 |      | $ | 210,392
|Fund XIII-XIV Associates  |  |      | 136,576 |      |   | 151,168
|                          |  |      |         |      |   |        
|                          |  | $    | 368,923 |      | $ | 361,560
|                          |  |      |         |      |   |        



Page F-11



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

Summary of Investments

The Partnerships investments and approximate ownership percentages in the Joint Ventures as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 are summarized below:



|                          |  |        |            |            |     |        |   |            |  |    
|------------------------- |  | ------ | ---------- | ---------- | --- | ------ | - | ---------- |  | ---
|                          |  | 2009   |            | 2008      
|                          |  | Amount |            | Percentage |     | Amount |   | Percentage
|Fund XIII-REIT Associates |  | $      | 8,023,199  |            | 28% |        | $ | 8,446,265  |  | 28%
|Fund XIII-XIV Associates  |  |        | 4,038,859  |            | 47% |        |   | 4,265,097  |  | 47%
|                          |  |        |            |            |     |        |   |            |  |    
|                          |  | $      | 12,062,058 |            |     |        | $ | 12,711,362 |  |    
|                          |  |        |            |            |     |        |   |            |  |    

Summary of Activity

Roll-forwards of the Partnerships investment in the Joint Ventures for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 are presented below:



|                                                |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |  
|----------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ---------- | - | ---- | - | ---------- | -
|                                                |  | 2009 |            |   | 2008 |  
|Investment in Joint Ventures, beginning of year |  | $    | 12,711,362 |   |      | $ | 13,412,493 |  
|Equity in income of Joint Ventures              |  |      | 786,177    |   |      |   | 573,477    |  
|Contributions to Joint Ventures                 |  |      | 0          |   |      |   | 63,293     |  
|Distributions from Joint Ventures               |  |      | (1,435,481 | ) |      |   | (1,337,901 | )
|                                                |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |  
|Investment in Joint Ventures, end of year       |  | $    | 12,062,058 |   |      | $ | 12,711,362 |  
|                                                |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |  

Summary of Financial Information

Condensed financial information for the Joint Ventures as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 and for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, is presented below:



|                          |  |                          |            |                               |   |                          |  |      |           |      |   |           |  |   |            |  |   |           
|------------------------- |  | ------------------------ | ---------- | ----------------------------- | - | ------------------------ |  | ---- | --------- | ---- | - | --------- |  | - | ---------- |  | - | ----------
|                          |  | Total AssetsDecember 31, |            | Total LiabilitiesDecember 31, |   | Total EquityDecember 31,
|                          |  | 2009                     |            | 2008                          |   | 2009                     |  | 2008 |           | 2009 |   | 2008     
|Fund XIII-REIT Associates |  | $                        | 31,660,056 |                               | $ | 33,211,988               |  | $    | 3,117,903 |      | $ | 3,164,797 |  | $ | 28,542,153 |  | $ | 30,047,191
|Fund XIII-XIV Associates  |  |                          | 8,913,406  |                               |   | 9,538,584                |  |      | 374,592   |      |   | 521,467   |  |   | 8,538,814  |  |   | 9,017,117 
|                          |  |                          |            |                               |   |                          |  |      |           |      |   |           |  |   |            |  |   |           
|                          |  | $                        | 40,573,462 |                               | $ | 42,750,572               |  | $    | 3,492,495 |      | $ | 3,686,264 |  | $ | 37,080,967 |  | $ | 39,064,308
|                          |  |                          |            |                               |   |                          |  |      |           |      |   |           |  |   |            |  |   |           



|                          |                                 |                |                                 |                                  |                                 |                                          |                                 |            |           |  |      |           |      |   |           |  |   |           |  |      |  |      |      |      |  |   |           |  |   |           |  |   |           |  |   |          
|------------------------- | ------------------------------- | -------------- | ------------------------------- | -------------------------------- | ------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------- | ------------------------------- | ---------- | --------- |  | ---- | --------- | ---- | - | --------- |  | - | --------- |  | ---- |  | ---- | ---- | ---- |  | - | --------- |  | - | --------- |  | - | --------- |  | - | ---------
|                          |                                 | Total Revenues |                                 | Income FromContinuing Operations |                                 | Income (Loss) FromDiscontinuedOperations |                                 | Net Income
|                          | For the Years EndedDecember 31, |                | For the Years EndedDecember 31, |                                  | For the Years EndedDecember 31, |                                          | For the Years EndedDecember 31,
|                          | 2009                            |                | 2008                            |                                  | 2007                            |                                          | 2009                            |            | 2008      |  | 2007 |           | 2009 |   | 2008      |  |   | 2007      |  | 2009 |  | 2008 |      | 2007
|Fund XIII-REIT Associates |                                 | $              | 6,112,880                       |                                  | $                               | 6,067,027                                |                                 | $          | 6,413,228 |  | $    | 1,810,897 |      | $ | 1,177,914 |  | $ | 1,263,626 |  | $0   |  | $    | 0    |      |  | $ | 26,198    |  | $ | 1,810,897 |  | $ | 1,177,914 |  | $ | 1,289,824
|Fund XIII -XIV Associates |                                 |                | 1,586,115                       |                                  |                                 | 1,589,375                                |                                 |            | 1,469,932 |  |      | 585,906   |      |   | 513,254   |  |   | 392,247   |  | 0    |  |      | (855 | )    |  |   | 5,240,244 |  |   | 585,906   |  |   | 512,399   |  |   | 5,632,491
|                          |                                 |                |                                 |                                  |                                 |                                          |                                 |            |           |  |      |           |      |   |           |  |   |           |  |      |  |      |      |      |  |   |           |  |   |           |  |   |           |  |   |          
|                          |                                 | $              | 7,698,995                       |                                  | $                               | 7,656,402                                |                                 | $          | 7,883,160 |  | $    | 2,396,803 |      | $ | 1,691,168 |  | $ | 1,655,873 |  | $0   |  | $    | (855 | )    |  | $ | 5,266,442 |  | $ | 2,396,803 |  | $ | 1,690,313 |  | $ | 6,922,315
|                          |                                 |                |                                 |                                  |                                 |                                          |                                 |            |           |  |      |           |      |   |           |  |   |           |  |      |  |      |      |      |  |   |           |  |   |           |  |   |           |  |   |          



Page F-12



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

The Partnership allocates its share of net income, net loss, and gain on sale generated by the properties
owned by the Joint Ventures to its Cash Preferred and Tax Preferred limited partners pursuant to the partnership agreement provisions outlined in Note 2. The components of income (loss) from discontinued operations recognized by the Joint Ventures
are provided below:



|                          |  |                 |  |             |  |       |      |               |      |   |             |    |       |   |      |                 |  |              |         |       |   |           |  |   |          
|------------------------- |  | --------------- |  | ----------- |  | ----- | ---- | ------------- | ---- | - | ----------- | -- | ----- | - | ---- | --------------- |  | ------------ | ------- | ----- | - | --------- |  | - | ---------
|                          |  | 2009            |  | 2008        |  |       | 2007
|                          |  | OperatingIncome |  | Gainon Sale |  | Total |      | OperatingLoss |      |   | Gainon Sale |    | Total |   |      | OperatingIncome |  | Gain on Sale |         | Total
|Fund XIII-REIT Associates |  | $0              |  | $0          |  | $0    |      | $             | 0    |   |             | $0 |       | $ | 0    |                 |  | $            | 26,198  |       | $ | 0         |  | $ | 26,198   
|Fund XIII-XIV Associates  |  | 0               |  | 0           |  | 0     |      |               | (855 | ) |             | 0  |       |   | (855 | )               |  |              | 136,198 |       |   | 5,104,046 |  |   | 5,240,244
|                          |  |                 |  |             |  |       |      |               |      |   |             |    |       |   |      |                 |  |              |         |       |   |           |  |   |          
|                          |  | $0              |  | $0          |  | $0    |      | $             | (855 | ) |             | $0 |       | $ | (855 | )               |  | $            | 162,396 |       | $ | 5,104,046 |  | $ | 5,266,442
|                          |  |                 |  |             |  |       |      |               |      |   |             |    |       |   |      |                 |  |              |         |       |   |           |  |   |          



|4. | RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS
|-- | --------------------------

Management
and Leasing Fees

The Partnership has entered into a property management, leasing, and asset management agreement with Wells Management
Company, Inc. (Wells Management), an affiliate of the General Partners. In accordance with the property management and leasing agreement, Wells Management receives compensation for the management and leasing of the Partnerships
properties, owned through the Joint Ventures, equal to the lesser of (a) fees that would be paid to a comparable outside firm, which is assessed periodically based on market studies; or (b) 4.5% of the gross revenues collected monthly;
plus, a separate competitive fee for the one-time initial lease-up of newly constructed properties generally paid in conjunction with the receipt of the first months rent. In the case of commercial properties leased on a long-term net-lease
basis (10 or more years), the maximum property management fee from such leases shall be 1% of the gross revenues generally paid over the life of the leases except for a one-time initial leasing fee of 3% of the gross revenues on each lease payable
over the first five full years of the original lease term. Management and leasing fees are paid by the Joint Ventures and, accordingly, are included in equity in income of joint ventures in the accompanying statements of operations. The
Partnerships share of management and leasing fees and lease acquisition costs incurred through the Joint Ventures that are payable to Wells Management is $27,904, $26,829, and $49,669 for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007,
respectively.

Administrative Reimbursements

Wells Capital, one of the Partnerships General Partners, and Wells Management perform certain administrative services for the Partnership, relating to accounting, property management and other
partnership administration, and incur the related expenses. Such expenses are allocated among other entities affiliated with the General Partners based on time spent on each fund by individual administrative personnel. In the opinion of the General
Partners, this allocation is a reasonable estimation of such expenses. The Partnership incurred administrative expenses of $98,145, $95,318, and $82,610 payable to Wells Capital and Wells Management for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008,
and 2007, respectively, which are included in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying statements of operations. In addition, Wells Capital and Wells Management pay for certain operating expenses of the Partnership
(bill-backs) directly and invoice the Partnership for the reimbursement thereof on a quarterly basis. As presented in the accompanying balance sheets, due to affiliates as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 represents administrative
reimbursements and bill-backs due to Wells Management and/or Wells Capital.



Page F-13



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

|5. | PER-UNIT AMOUNTS
|-- | ----------------

Income (loss) per
limited partnership unit amounts are calculated based upon weighted-average units outstanding during the respective periods. Income (loss) per limited partnership unit, as presented in the accompanying financial statements, will vary from the
per-unit amounts attributable to the individual investors due to the differences between the GAAP and tax basis treatment of certain items of income and expense and the fact that, within the respective classes of Cash Preferred Units and Tax
Preferred Units, individual units have different characteristics including capital bases, cumulative operating and net property sales proceeds distributions and cumulative earnings allocations as a result of, among other things, the ability of unit
holders to elect to be treated as Cash Preferred Units or Tax Preferred Units, or to change their prior elections, on a quarterly basis.

For
the reasons mentioned above, distributions of net sale proceeds per unit also vary among individual unit holders. Distributions of net sale proceeds have been calculated at the investor level pursuant to the partnership agreement and allocated
between the Cash Preferred and Tax Preferred limited partners in the period paid. Accordingly, distributions of net sale proceeds per unit, as presented in the accompanying financial statements, vary from the per-unit amounts attributable to the
individual investors.



|6. | INCOME TAX BASIS NET INCOME AND PARTNERS CAPITAL
|-- | -------------------------------------------------

A reconciliation of the Partnerships financial statement net income to net income presented in accordance with the federal income tax basis of accounting is as follows for the years ended
December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007:



|                                                                                                            |  |      |         |   |      |   |         |      |  |   |           |  
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ------- | - | ---- | - | ------- | ---- |  | - | --------- | -
|                                                                                                            |  | 2009 |         |   | 2008 |   |         | 2007 | 
|Financial statement net income                                                                              |  | $    | 626,923 |   |      | $ | 392,684 |      |  | $ | 3,066,532 |  
|Adjustments in net income resulting from:                                                                   |  |      |         |   |      |   |         |      |  |   |           |  
|Depreciation expense for financial reporting purposes less than amounts for income tax purposes             |  |      | (72,062 | ) |      |   | (77,569 | )    |  |   | (83,770   | )
|Amortization expense for financial reporting purposes greater than amounts for income tax purposes          |  |      | 240,292 |   |      |   | 425,423 |      |  |   | 649,679   |  
|Bad debt (recoveries) expense for financial reporting purposes in excess of amounts for income tax purposes |  |      | (21,878 | ) |      |   | 0       |      |  |   | 12,056    |  
|Rental income for financial reporting purposes less than (greater than) amounts for income tax purposes     |  |      | 72,809  |   |      |   | 64,698  |      |  |   | 2,780     |  
|Gains on sale of properties for financial reporting purposes in excess of amounts for income tax purposes   |  |      | 0       |   |      |   | 0       |      |  |   | (370,145  | )
|Other                                                                                                       |  |      | (14,349 | ) |      |   | 15,345  |      |  |   | (89,293   | )
|                                                                                                            |  |      |         |   |      |   |         |      |  |   |           |  
|Income tax basis net income                                                                                 |  | $    | 831,735 |   |      | $ | 820,581 |      |  | $ | 3,187,839 |  
|                                                                                                            |  |      |         |   |      |   |         |      |  |   |           |  



Page F-14



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

A reconciliation of the partners capital balances, as presented in the accompanying financial
statements, to partners capital balances, as presented in accordance with the federal income tax basis of accounting, is as follows for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007:



|                                                                                                                                         |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |            |  
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ---------- | - | ---- | - | ---------- | ---- |  | - | ---------- | -
|                                                                                                                                         |  | 2009 |            |   | 2008 |   |            | 2007 | 
|Financial statement partners capital                                                                                                    |  | $    | 13,914,272 |   |      | $ | 13,559,635 |      |  | $ | 13,575,245 |  
|Increase (decrease) in partners capital resulting from:                                                                                 |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |            |  
|Accumulated depreciation expense for financial reporting purposes (less than) greater than amounts for income tax
purposes               |  |      | (119,005   | ) |      |   | (46,943    | )    |  |   | 30,626     |  
|Accumulated amortization expense for financial reporting purposes greater than amounts for income tax purposes                           |  |      | 4,302,615  |   |      |   | 4,062,323  |      |  |   | 3,636,900  |  
|Accumulated meals and entertainment                                                                                                      |  |      | 31         |   |      |   | 31         |      |  |   | 31         |  
|Accumulated bad debt (recoveries) expense, net for financial reporting purposes in excess of amounts for income tax
purposes             |  |      | (9,838     | ) |      |   | 12,040     |      |  |   | 12,040     |  
|Capitalization of syndication costs for income tax purposes, which are accounted for as cost of capital for financial reporting
purposes |  |      | 4,568,769  |   |      |   | 4,568,769  |      |  |   | 4,568,769  |  
|Accumulated rental income for income tax purposes greater than (less than) amounts for financial reporting
purposes                      |  |      | 30,305     |   |      |   | (42,504    | )    |  |   | (107,202   | )
|Partnership distributions payable                                                                                                        |  |      | 0          |   |      |   | 0          |      |  |   | 290,183    |  
|Accumulated gains on sale of properties for financial reporting purposes in excess of amounts for income tax
purposes                    |  |      | (610,353   | ) |      |   | (610,353   | )    |  |   | (610,353   | )
|Other                                                                                                                                    |  |      | (109,844   | ) |      |   | (95,495    | )    |  |   | (110,839   | )
|                                                                                                                                         |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |            |  
|Income tax basis partners capital                                                                                                       |  | $    | 21,966,952 |   |      | $ | 21,407,503 |      |  | $ | 21,285,400 |  
|                                                                                                                                         |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |            |  



Page F-15



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

|7. | QUARTERLY RESULTS (UNAUDITED)
|-- | -----------------------------

Presented
below is a summary of the unaudited quarterly financial information for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008:



|                                                                                         |  |                     |         |   |         |   |              |  |             |         |  |   |        
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------- | ------- | - | ------- | - | ------------ |  | ----------- | ------- |  | - | -------
|                                                                                         |  | 2009 Quarters Ended
|                                                                                         |  | March 31            |         |   | June 30 |   | September 30 |  | December 31
|Equity in income of joint ventures                                                       |  | $                   | 182,212 |   |         | $ | 216,741      |  | $           | 163,241 |  | $ | 223,983
|Interest and other income                                                                |  | $                   | 0       |   |         | $ | 0            |  | $           | 0       |  | $ | 0      
|Net income                                                                               |  | $                   | 132,723 |   |         | $ | 182,434      |  | $           | 131,205 |  | $ | 180,561
|Net income (loss) allocated to:                                                          |  |                     |         |   |         |   |              |  |             |         |  |   |        
|Cash Preferred Limited Partners                                                          |  | $                   | 132,757 |   |         | $ | 181,971      |  | $           | 129,893 |  | $ | 178,756
|Tax Preferred Limited Partners                                                           |  | $                   | 0       |   |         | $ | 0            |  | $           | 0       |  | $ | 0      
|General Partners                                                                         |  | $                   | (34     | ) |         | $ | 463          |  | $           | 1,312   |  | $ | 1,805  
|Net income per weighted-average limited partner unit outstanding:                        |  |                     |         |   |         |   |              |  |             |         |  |   |        
|Cash Preferred(a)                                                                        |  |                     | $0.04   |   |         |   | $0.06        |  |             | $0.04   |  |   | $0.06  
|Tax Preferred                                                                            |  |                     | $0.00   |   |         |   | $0.00        |  |             | $0.00   |  |   | $0.00  
|Distribution of operating cash per weighted-average limited partner unit outstanding:    |  |                     |         |   |         |   |              |  |             |         |  |   |        
|Cash Preferred                                                                           |  |                     | $0.04   |   |         |   | $0.04        |  |             | $0.00   |  |   | $0.00  
|Tax Preferred                                                                            |  |                     | $0.00   |   |         |   | $0.00        |  |             | $0.00   |  |   | $0.00  
|Distribution of net sale proceeds per weighted-average limited partner unit outstanding: |  |                     |         |   |         |   |              |  |             |         |  |   |        
|Cash Preferred                                                                           |  |                     | $0.00   |   |         |   | $0.00        |  |             | $0.00   |  |   | $0.00  
|Tax Preferred                                                                            |  |                     | $0.00   |   |         |   | $0.00        |  |             | $0.00   |  |   | $0.00  



|                                                                                         |  |                     |         |         |   |              |  |             |         |  |   |        
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------- | ------- | ------- | - | ------------ |  | ----------- | ------- |  | - | -------
|                                                                                         |  | 2008 Quarters Ended
|                                                                                         |  | March 31            |         | June 30 |   | September 30 |  | December 31
|Equity in income of joint ventures                                                       |  | $                   | 148,902 |         | $ | 89,637       |  | $           | 167,962 |  | $ | 166,976
|Interest and other income                                                                |  | $                   | 70      |         | $ | 80           |  | $           | 82      |  | $ | 699    
|Net income                                                                               |  | $                   | 83,370  |         | $ | 43,857       |  | $           | 129,743 |  | $ | 135,714
|Net income (loss) allocated to:                                                          |  |                     |         |         |   |              |  |             |         |  |   |        
|Cash Preferred Limited Partners                                                          |  | $                   | 83,370  |         | $ | 43,857       |  | $           | 128,446 |  | $ | 134,355
|Tax Preferred Limited Partners                                                           |  | $                   | 0       |         | $ | 0            |  | $           | 0       |  | $ | 0      
|General Partners                                                                         |  | $                   | 0       |         | $ | 0            |  | $           | 1,297   |  | $ | 1,359  
|Net income (loss) per weighted-average limited partner unit outstanding:                 |  |                     |         |         |   |              |  |             |         |  |   |        
|Cash Preferred                                                                           |  |                     | $0.03   |         |   | $0.01        |  |             | $0.04   |  |   | $0.04  
|Tax Preferred                                                                            |  |                     | $0.00   |         |   | $0.00        |  |             | $0.00   |  |   | $0.00  
|Distribution of operating cash per weighted-average limited partner unit outstanding:    |  |                     |         |         |   |              |  |             |         |  |   |        
|Cash Preferred(b)                                                                        |  |                     | $0.08   |         |   | $0.04        |  |             | $0.00   |  |   | $0.00  
|Tax Preferred                                                                            |  |                     | $0.00   |         |   | $0.00        |  |             | $0.00   |  |   | $0.00  
|Distribution of net sale proceeds per weighted-average limited partner unit outstanding: |  |                     |         |         |   |              |  |             |         |  |   |        
|Cash Preferred                                                                           |  |                     | $0.00   |         |   | $0.00        |  |             | $0.00   |  |   | $0.00  
|Tax Preferred                                                                            |  |                     | $0.00   |         |   | $0.00        |  |             | $0.00   |  |   | $0.00  



| | (a) | The quarterly per-unit amounts have been calculated using actual income for the respective quarters. Conversely, the corresponding annual income
per-unit amounts have been calculated assuming that income was earned ratably over the year. As a result, the sum of these quarterly per-unit amounts does not equal the respective annual per-unit amount presented in the accompanying financial
statements.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | The quarterly per-unit amounts have been calculated using actual distributions for the respective quarters. Conversely, the corresponding
distributions per-unit amounts have been calculated assuming that distributions were earned ratably over the year. As a result, the sum of these quarterly per-unit amounts does not equal the respective annual per-unit amount presented in the
accompanying financial statements.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Page F-16



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

|8. | GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS
|-- | --------------------------------

General
and administrative costs for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007 are composed of the following items:



|                                       |  |      |         |      |   |         |  |   |        
|-------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ------- | ---- | - | ------- |  | - | -------
|                                       |  | 2009 |         | 2008 |   | 2007   
|Salary reimbursements                  |  | $    | 98,145  |      | $ | 95,318  |  | $ | 82,610 
|Printing expenses                      |  |      | 25,327  |      |   | 29,934  |  |   | 36,247 
|Independent accounting fees            |  |      | 16,438  |      |   | 22,793  |  |   | 27,467 
|Postage and delivery expenses          |  |      | 8,915   |      |   | 8,094   |  |   | 7,374  
|Legal fees                             |  |      | 3,672   |      |   | 4,558   |  |   | 4,114  
|Taxes and licensing fees               |  |      | 2,900   |      |   | 15,267  |  |   | 1,274  
|Computer costs                         |  |      | 1,707   |      |   | 1,187   |  |   | 1,037  
|Other professional fees                |  |      | 1,366   |      |   | 3,807   |  |   | 2,893  
|Registration and filing fees           |  |      | 784     |      |   | 766     |  |   | 806    
|                                       |  |      |         |      |   |         |  |   |        
|Total general and administrative costs |  | $    | 159,254 |      | $ | 181,724 |  | $ | 163,822
|                                       |  |      |         |      |   |         |  |   |        



|9. | COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
|-- | -----------------------------

Certain
lease agreements include provisions that, at the option of the tenant, may obligate the Partnership to expend capital to expand an existing property or provide other expenditures for the benefit of the tenant. Through September 30, 2010, the
majority tenant at the Siemens  Orlando Building, Siemens, has the right to request the reimbursement of a tenant allowance up to approximately $237,000, which will be required to be funded by Fund XIII-XIV Associates.



Page F-17



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The General Partners of

Wells
Fund XIII-REIT Joint Venture Partnership:

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Wells Fund XIII-REIT Joint Venture Partnership
(the Joint Venture) as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related statements of operations, partners capital, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009. Our audits also included
the financial statement schedule listed in the index at Item 15(a). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Joint Ventures management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements
and schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
(United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Joint Ventures
internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an
opinion on the effectiveness of the Joint Ventures internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Wells
Fund XIII-REIT Joint Venture Partnership as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009, in conformity with U.S. generally
accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth
therein.

/s/    Frazier & Deeter, LLC

Atlanta, Georgia

March 18, 2010



Page F-18



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

WELLS FUND XIII-REIT JOINT VENTURE PARTNERSHIP

BALANCE SHEETS

DECEMBER 31, 2009 AND 2008

ASSETS



|                                                                                                                                           |  |      |            |      |   |           
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ---- | ---------- | ---- | - | ----------
|                                                                                                                                           |  | 2009 |            | 2008
|Real estate assets, at cost:                                                                                                               |  |      |            |      |   |           
|Land                                                                                                                                       |  | $    | 2,671,824  |      | $ | 2,671,824 
|Building and improvements, less accumulated depreciation of $6,354,067 and $5,513,493 at December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively          |  |      | 24,924,991 |      |   | 25,765,565
|Intangible lease assets, less accumulated amortization of $1,029,567 and $4,057,441 at December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively            |  |      | 164,731    |      |   | 329,461   
|                                                                                                                                           |  |      |            |      |   |           
|Total real estate assets                                                                                                                   |  |      | 27,761,546 |      |   | 28,766,850
|                                                                                                                                           |  |     
|Cash and cash equivalents                                                                                                                  |  |      | 3,088,817  |      |   | 3,186,337 
|Tenant receivables, net                                                                                                                    |  |      | 459,466    |      |   | 562,692   
|Intangible lease origination costs, less accumulated amortization of $1,119,098 and $3,215,820 at December 31, 2009 and
2008, respectively |  |      | 179,055    |      |   | 358,111   
|Deferred leasing costs, less accumulated amortization of $291,399 and $128,083 at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively                 |  |      | 163,315    |      |   | 326,631   
|Other assets, net                                                                                                                          |  |      | 7,857      |      |   | 11,367    
|                                                                                                                                           |  |      |            |      |   |           
|Total assets                                                                                                                               |  | $    | 31,660,056 |      | $ | 33,211,988
|                                                                                                                                           |  |      |            |      |   |           

LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS CAPITAL



|                                                                                                                                |  |   |            |  |   |           
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | - | ---------- |  | - | ----------
|Liabilities:                                                                                                                    |  |   |            |  |   |           
|Intangible lease liabilities, less accumulated amortization of $44,337 and $174,464 at December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively |  | $ | 7,093      |  | $ | 14,187    
|Accounts payable and accrued expenses                                                                                           |  |   | 1,670,519  |  |   | 1,649,340 
|Due to affiliates                                                                                                               |  |   | 50,658     |  |   | 43,128    
|Deferred income                                                                                                                 |  |   | 563,069    |  |   | 709,682   
|Partnership distributions payable                                                                                               |  |   | 826,564    |  |   | 748,460   
|                                                                                                                                |  |   |            |  |   |           
|Total liabilities                                                                                                               |  |   | 3,117,903  |  |   | 3,164,797 
|                                                                                                                                |  |  
|Partners capital:                                                                                                              |  |   |            |  |   |           
|Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P.                                                                                               |  |   | 8,023,199  |  |   | 8,446,265 
|Piedmont Operating Partnership, LP                                                                                              |  |   | 20,518,954 |  |   | 21,600,926
|                                                                                                                                |  |   |            |  |   |           
|Total partners capital                                                                                                         |  |   | 28,542,153 |  |   | 30,047,191
|                                                                                                                                |  |   |            |  |   |           
|Total liabilities and partners capital                                                                                         |  | $ | 31,660,056 |  | $ | 33,211,988
|                                                                                                                                |  |   |            |  |   |           

See accompanying notes.



Page F-19



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

WELLS FUND XIII-REIT JOINT VENTURE PARTNERSHIP

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED

DECEMBER 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007



|                                      |  |      |           |      |   |           |  |   |          
|------------------------------------- |  | ---- | --------- | ---- | - | --------- |  | - | ---------
|                                      |  | 2009 |           | 2008 |   | 2007     
|REVENUES:                             |  |      |           |      |   |           |  |   |          
|Rental income                         |  | $    | 3,727,981 |      | $ | 3,720,192 |  | $ | 3,988,548
|Reimbursement income                  |  |      | 2,384,899 |      |   | 2,321,976 |  |   | 2,336,099
|Interest and other income             |  |      | 0         |      |   | 24,859    |  |   | 88,581   
|                                      |  |      |           |      |   |           |  |   |          
|Total revenues                        |  |      | 6,112,880 |      |   | 6,067,027 |  |   | 6,413,228
|                                      |  |      |          
|EXPENSES:                             |  |      |           |      |   |           |  |   |          
|Property operating costs              |  |      | 2,569,682 |      |   | 2,650,248 |  |   | 2,439,893
|Management and leasing fees:          |  |      |           |      |   |           |  |   |          
|Related-party                         |  |      | 273,684   |      |   | 289,812   |  |   | 261,809  
|Other                                 |  |      | 0         |      |   | 0         |  |   | 33,750   
|Depreciation                          |  |      | 840,574   |      |   | 840,574   |  |   | 840,574  
|Amortization                          |  |      | 507,102   |      |   | 946,454   |  |   | 1,454,011
|General and administrative            |  |      | 110,941   |      |   | 162,025   |  |   | 119,565  
|                                      |  |      |           |      |   |           |  |   |          
|Total expenses                        |  |      | 4,301,983 |      |   | 4,889,113 |  |   | 5,149,602
|                                      |  |      |           |      |   |           |  |   |          
|NET INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS |  |      | 1,810,897 |      |   | 1,177,914 |  |   | 1,263,626
|                                      |  |      |          
|INCOME FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS   |  |      | 0         |      |   | 0         |  |   | 26,198   
|                                      |  |      |           |      |   |           |  |   |          
|NET INCOME                            |  | $    | 1,810,897 |      | $ | 1,177,914 |  | $ | 1,289,824
|                                      |  |      |           |      |   |           |  |   |          

See accompanying notes.



Page F-20



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

WELLS FUND XIII-REIT JOINT VENTURE PARTNERSHIP

STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS CAPITAL

FOR THE YEARS ENDED

DECEMBER 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007



|                           |  |                                 |            |   |                                  |   |            |                       |  |   |            |  
|-------------------------- |  | ------------------------------- | ---------- | - | -------------------------------- | - | ---------- | --------------------- |  | - | ---------- | -
|                           |  | Wells RealEstateFund XIII, L.P. |            |   | PiedmontOperatingPartnership, LP |   |            | TotalPartnersCapital | 
|Balance, December 31, 2006 |  | $                               | 9,617,225  |   |                                  | $ | 24,595,599 |                       |  | $ | 34,212,824 |  
|                           |  |                                 |           
|Net income                 |  |                                 | 362,570    |   |                                  |   | 927,254    |                       |  |   | 1,289,824  |  
|Partnership distributions  |  |                                 | (1,003,605 | ) |                                  |   | (2,566,671 | )                     |  |   | (3,570,276 | )
|                           |  |                                 |            |   |                                  |   |            |                       |  |   |            |  
|Balance, December 31, 2007 |  |                                 | 8,976,190  |   |                                  |   | 22,956,182 |                       |  |   | 31,932,372 |  
|                           |  |                                 |           
|Net income                 |  |                                 | 331,112    |   |                                  |   | 846,802    |                       |  |   | 1,177,914  |  
|Partnership distributions  |  |                                 | (861,037   | ) |                                  |   | (2,202,058 | )                     |  |   | (3,063,095 | )
|                           |  |                                 |            |   |                                  |   |            |                       |  |   |            |  
|Balance, December 31, 2008 |  |                                 | 8,446,265  |   |                                  |   | 21,600,926 |                       |  |   | 30,047,191 |  
|                           |  |                                 |           
|Net income                 |  |                                 | 509,043    |   |                                  |   | 1,301,854  |                       |  |   | 1,810,897  |  
|Partnership distributions  |  |                                 | (932,109   | ) |                                  |   | (2,383,826 | )                     |  |   | (3,315,935 | )
|                           |  |                                 |            |   |                                  |   |            |                       |  |   |            |  
|Balance, December 31, 2009 |  | $                               | 8,023,199  |   |                                  | $ | 20,518,954 |                       |  | $ | 28,542,153 |  
|                           |  |                                 |            |   |                                  |   |            |                       |  |   |            |  

See accompanying notes.



Page F-21



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

WELLS FUND XIII-REIT JOINT VENTURE PARTNERSHIP

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED

DECEMBER 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007



|                                                                                         |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |            |  
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ---------- | - | ---- | - | ---------- | ---- |  | - | ---------- | -
|                                                                                         |  | 2009 |            |   | 2008 |   |            | 2007 | 
|CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:                                                    |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |            |  
|Net income                                                                               |  | $    | 1,810,897  |   |      | $ | 1,177,914  |      |  | $ | 1,289,824  |  
|Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:        |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |            |  
|Depreciation                                                                             |  |      | 840,574    |   |      |   | 840,574    |      |  |   | 840,574    |  
|Amortization                                                                             |  |      | 500,008    |   |      |   | 947,960    |      |  |   | 1,439,495  |  
|Decrease in tenant receivables, net                                                      |  |      | 103,226    |   |      |   | 115,178    |      |  |   | 15,738     |  
|Decrease in other assets, net                                                            |  |      | 3,510      |   |      |   | 8,051      |      |  |   | 1,030      |  
|Increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses                                        |  |      | 21,179     |   |      |   | 206,556    |      |  |   | 104,268    |  
|Increase in due to affiliates                                                            |  |      | 7,530      |   |      |   | 15,727     |      |  |   | 26,772     |  
|(Decrease) increase in deferred income                                                   |  |      | (146,613   | ) |      |   | 300,884    |      |  |   | 242,542    |  
|                                                                                         |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |            |  
|Net cash provided by operating activities                                                |  |      | 3,140,311  |   |      |   | 3,612,844  |      |  |   | 3,960,243  |  
|                                                                                         |  |      |           
|CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:                                                    |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |            |  
|Operating distributions paid to joint venture partners in excess of accumulated earnings |  |      | (3,237,831 | ) |      |   | (3,192,296 | )    |  |   | (3,618,299 | )
|                                                                                         |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |            |  
|NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS                                     |  |      | (97,520    | ) |      |   | 420,548    |      |  |   | 341,944    |  
|                                                                                         |  |      |           
|CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of year                                             |  |      | 3,186,337  |   |      |   | 2,765,789  |      |  |   | 2,423,845  |  
|                                                                                         |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |            |  
|CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of year                                                   |  | $    | 3,088,817  |   |      | $ | 3,186,337  |      |  | $ | 2,765,789  |  
|                                                                                         |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |            |  
|                                                                                         |  |      |           
|SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:                   |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |            |  
|Partnership distributions payable                                                        |  | $    | 826,564    |   |      | $ | 748,460    |      |  | $ | 877,661    |  
|                                                                                         |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |            |  

See accompanying notes.



Page F-22



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

WELLS FUND XIII-REIT JOINT VENTURE PARTNERSHIP

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2009, 2008, AND 2007



|1. | ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS
|-- | -------------------------

On
June 27, 2001, Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P. (Fund XIII) and Piedmont Operating Partnership, LP (Piedmont OP), formerly known as Wells Operating Partnership, L.P., entered into a Georgia general partnership to form
Wells Fund XIII-REIT Joint Venture Partnership (the Joint Venture). The general partners of Fund XIII are Leo F. Wells, III and Wells Capital, Inc. (Wells Capital). Piedmont OP is a Delaware limited partnership with
Piedmont Office Realty Trust, Inc. (Piedmont REIT), formerly known as Wells Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., serving as its general partner. Piedmont REIT is a Maryland corporation that qualifies as a real estate investment
trust.

The Joint Venture was formed to acquire and operate commercial real properties, including properties to be developed, currently under
development or construction, newly constructed or having operating histories. On July 16, 2001, the Joint Venture purchased a two-story office building containing approximately 85,000 square feet, the AmeriCredit Building, located in Orange
Park, Florida. On December 21, 2001, the Joint Venture purchased two connected one-story office and assembly buildings consisting of approximately 148,000 square feet, 8560 Upland Drive, located in Parker, Colorado. On December 12, 2002,
the Joint Venture purchased a four-story office building containing approximately 141,000 square feet, the John Wiley Building, located in Fishers, Indiana. On September 19, 2003, the Joint Venture purchased a four-story office building
containing approximately 194,000 square feet, the AIU  Chicago Building, located in Hoffman Estates, Illinois. Ownership interests were recomputed based on relative cumulative capital contributions from the joint venture partners.

On April 13, 2005, the Joint Venture sold the AmeriCredit Building and the John Wiley Building to an unrelated third party for an aggregate gross
selling price of $35,974,000. As a result of the sale, the Joint Venture recognized a gain of approximately $7,318,000 and received net sale proceeds of approximately $35,729,000.



|2. | SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|-- | ------------------------------------------

Basis of Presentation

The Joint Ventures financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles (GAAP).

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the Joint Ventures financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities,
revenues, and expenses and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Real Estate Assets

Investment in Real Estate Assets

Real estate assets are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Amounts capitalized to real estate assets consist of the cost of
acquisition or construction, application of acquisition fees incurred, and any tenant improvements or major improvements and betterments which extend the useful life of the related asset. The Joint Venture considers the period of future benefit of
the asset to determine the appropriate useful lives. These assessments have a direct impact on net income. Upon receiving notification of a tenants intention to terminate a lease, undepreciated tenant improvements and intangible lease assets
are written off to lease termination expense. All repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred.



Page F-23



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

The Joint Ventures real estate assets are depreciated or amortized using the straight-line method over
the following useful lives:



|                        |  |                                       
|----------------------- |  | --------------------------------------
|Buildings               |  | 40 years                              
|Building improvements   |  | 5-25 years                            
|Land improvements       |  | 20 years                              
|Tenant improvements     |  | Shorter of lease term or economic life
|Intangible lease assets |  | Lease term                            

Evaluating the Recoverability of Real
Estate Assets

Management continually monitors events and changes in circumstances that could indicate that the carrying amounts of the
real estate assets and related intangible assets owned by the Joint Venture may not be recoverable. When indicators of potential impairment are present, which suggest that the carrying amounts of the real estate assets and related intangible assets
may not be recoverable, management assesses the recoverability of the real estate assets and related intangible assets by determining whether the respective carrying values will be recovered through the estimated undiscounted future operating cash
flows expected from the use of the assets and their eventual disposition for assets held for use, or with the estimated fair values, less costs to sell, for assets held for sale. In the event that the expected undiscounted future cash flows for
assets held for use, or the estimated fair value, less costs to sell, for assets held for sale, do not exceed the respective assets carrying values, management adjusts the real estate assets and related intangible assets to the respective
estimated fair values, pursuant to the provisions of the property, plant, and equipment accounting standard for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets, and recognizes an impairment loss. Estimated fair values are determined based on
the following information, dependent upon availability: (i) recently quoted market price(s) for the subject property, or highly comparable properties, under sufficiently active and normal market conditions, or (ii) the present value of
future cash flows, including estimated residual value. The Joint Venture has determined that there has been no impairment in the carrying value of any of the real estate assets held as of December 31, 2009.

While various techniques and assumptions can be used to estimate fair value depending on the nature of the asset or liability, the accounting standard for
fair value measurements and disclosures describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Joint Venture has the
ability to access. Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs may include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in
active markets, as well as inputs that are observable for the asset or liability (other than quoted prices), such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals. Level 3 inputs are
unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, which is typically based on an entitys own assumptions, as there is little, if any, related market activity or information. In instances where the determination of the fair value measurement is
based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its
entirety. The Joint Ventures assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the asset or liability. The accounting standard for fair value
measurements and disclosures was applied to the Joint Ventures outstanding nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities effective January 1, 2009.

Allocation of Purchase Price of Acquired Assets

Upon acquisition, the Joint Venture
allocated the purchase price of properties to the identifiable tangible assets, which consist of land and building, and identifiable intangible assets and liabilities, which consist of the following items:



| |  |  | Direct costs associated with obtaining a new tenant, including commissions, tenant improvements and other direct costs are included in intangible lease
origination costs in the accompanying balance sheets and are amortized to expense over the remaining terms of the respective leases.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Page F-24



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

| |  |  | The value of opportunity costs associated with lost rentals avoided by acquiring an in-place lease are included in intangible lease assets in the
accompanying balance sheets and are amortized to expense over the remaining terms of the respective leases.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | The value of tenant relationships is included in intangible lease assets in the accompanying balance sheets and amortized to expense over the remaining
terms of the respective leases.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | The value of effective rental rates of in-place leases that are above or below the market rates of comparable leases is recorded as intangible lease
assets or liabilities and amortized as an adjustment to rental income over the remaining terms of the respective leases.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

During the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, the Joint Venture recognized the following amortization of intangible lease assets and liabilities:



|                                 |  |                                  |        |                                 |   |                                                 |  |   |         |  |   |       
|-------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------- | ------ | ------------------------------- | - | ----------------------------------------------- |  | - | ------- |  | - | ------
|                                 |  | Intangible Lease Assets          |        | IntangibleLeaseOriginationCosts |   | IntangibleBelow-MarketIn-Place LeaseLiabilities
|For the year ending December 31: |  | Above-MarketIn-Place LeaseAssets |        | AbsorptionPeriod Costs          |   |                                                
|2009                             |  | $                                | 0      |                                 | $ | 164,730                                         |  | $ | 179,056 |  | $ | 7,094 
|                                 |  |                                  |        |                                 |   |                                                 |  |   |         |  |   |       
|2008                             |  | $                                | 13,732 |                                 | $ | 473,508                                         |  | $ | 382,764 |  | $ | 12,226
|                                 |  |                                  |        |                                 |   |                                                 |  |   |         |  |   |       
|2007                             |  | $                                | 16,479 |                                 | $ | 800,081                                         |  | $ | 636,882 |  | $ | 30,995
|                                 |  |                                  |        |                                 |   |                                                 |  |   |         |  |   |       

As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Joint Venture had the
following gross intangible in-place lease assets and liabilities:



|     |  |                                  |  |                                 |           |                                                 |   |           |  |   |        
|---- |  | -------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------- | --------- | ----------------------------------------------- | - | --------- |  | - | -------
|     |  | Intangible Lease Assets          |  | IntangibleLeaseOriginationCosts |           | IntangibleBelow-MarketIn-Place LeaseLiabilities
|     |  | Above-MarketIn-Place LeaseAssets |  | AbsorptionPeriod Costs          |           |                                                
|2009 |  | $0                               |  | $                               | 1,194,298 |                                                 | $ | 1,298,153 |  | $ | 51,430 
|     |  |                                  |  |                                 |           |                                                 |   |           |  |   |        
|2008 |  | $0                               |  | $                               | 4,386,902 |                                                 | $ | 3,573,931 |  | $ | 188,651
|     |  |                                  |  |                                 |           |                                                 |   |           |  |   |        

The remaining intangible assets and liabilities will be amortized as
follows:



|                                 |                        |                        |         |                                   |   |                                       |  |   |       
|-------------------------------- | ---------------------- | ---------------------- | ------- | --------------------------------- | - | ------------------------------------- |  | - | ------
|For the year ending December 31: |                        | Intangible LeaseAssets |         | Intangible LeaseOrigination Costs |   | IntangibleBelow-MarketLease Liability
|                                 | AbsorptionPeriod Costs |                        |        
|2010                             |                        | $                      | 164,731 |                                   | $ | 179,055                               |  | $ | 7,093 
|Thereafter                       |                        |                        | 0       |                                   |   | 0                                     |  |   | 0     
|                                 |                        |                        |         |                                   |   |                                       |  |   |       
|                                 |                        | $                      | 164,731 |                                   | $ | 179,055                               |  | $ | 7,093 
|                                 |                        |                        |         |                                   |   |                                       |  |   |       
|Average Amortization Period      |                        |                        | 1 year  |                                   |   | 1 year                                |  |   | 1 year

Evaluating the Recoverability of
Intangible Assets and Liabilities

The values of intangible lease assets and liabilities are determined based on assumptions made at the
time of acquisition and have defined useful lives, which correspond with the lease terms. There may be instances in which intangible lease assets and liabilities become impaired and the Joint Venture is required to expense the remaining asset or
liability immediately or over a shorter period of time. Lease restructurings, including but not limited to lease terminations and lease extensions, may impact the value and useful life of in-place leases.



Page F-25



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

In-place leases that are terminated, partially terminated, or modified will be evaluated for impairment if the original in-place lease terms
have been modified. In the event that the discounted cash flows of the original in-place lease stream do not exceed the discounted modified in-place lease stream, the Joint Venture adjusts the
carrying value of the intangible lease assets to the discounted cash flows and recognizes an impairment loss. For in-place lease extensions that are executed more than one year prior to the original in-place lease
expiration date, the useful life of the in-place lease will be extended over the new lease term with the exception of those in-place lease components, such as lease commissions and tenant allowances, which have
been renegotiated for the extended term. Renegotiated in-place lease components, such as lease commissions and tenant allowances, will be amortized over the shorter of the useful life of the asset or the new lease term.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Joint
Venture considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents include cash and short-term investments. Short-term investments are stated at cost, which
approximates fair value, and consist of investments in money market accounts.

Tenant Receivables, net

Tenant receivables are comprised of rental and reimbursement billings due from tenants and the cumulative amount of future adjustments necessary to present
rental income using the straight-line method. Upon receiving notification of a tenants intention to terminate a lease, unamortized straight-line rent receivables are written off to lease termination expense. Tenant receivables are recorded at
the original amount earned, less an allowance for any doubtful accounts, which approximates fair value. Management assesses the collectibility of tenant receivables on an ongoing basis and provides for allowances as such balances, or portions
thereof, become uncollectible. Allowances of $0 and $19,466 are included in tenant receivables as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Deferred Leasing Costs, net

Deferred lease costs may include (i) costs incurred to procure leases, which are capitalized
and recognized as amortization expense on a straight-line basis over the terms of the lease, and (ii) common area maintenance costs that are recoverable from tenants under the terms of the existing leases; such costs are capitalized and
recognized as operating expenses over the shorter of the lease term or the recovery period provided for in the lease. The remaining unamortized balance of deferred leasing costs will be amortized over a weighted-average period of approximately
one year. Upon receiving notification of a tenants intention to terminate a lease, unamortized deferred leasing costs are written-off to lease termination expense.

Other Assets, net

Other assets as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 is comprised of the
following items:



|                    |  |      |       |      |   |       
|------------------- |  | ---- | ----- | ---- | - | ------
|                    |  | 2009 |       | 2008
|Prepaid expenses    |  | $    | 7,857 |      | $ | 10,564
|Interest receivable |  |      | 0     |      |   | 803   
|                    |  |      |       |      |   |       
|Total               |  | $    | 7,857 |      | $ | 11,367
|                    |  |      |       |      |   |       

Management assesses the collectibility of other assets on an ongoing
basis and provides for allowances as such balances, or portions thereof, become uncollectible. Allowances of $0 and $77,831 are included in other assets as of December 31, 2009 and 2008. Prepaid expenses are recognized as the related services
are provided. Interest receivable represents interest earned during the period presented, which will be received in the following month. Balances without a future economic benefit are written-off as they are identified.



Page F-26



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses

Accounts payable and accrued expenses are primarily comprised of accrued real estate taxes and property operating costs. Accrued real estate taxes of approximately $1,576,000 and $1,485,000 is included in
accounts payable and accrued expenses as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Allocation of Income and Distributions

Pursuant to the terms of the joint venture agreement, income and distributions are allocated to the joint venture partners based their
respective ownership interests as determined by relative cumulative capital contributions, as defined. Fund XIII and Piedmont OP held ownership interests in the Joint Venture of approximately 28% and 72%, respectively, for the years ended
December 31, 2009 and 2008. Net cash from operations is generally distributed to the joint venture partners on a quarterly basis.

Revenue Recognition

The Joint Ventures leases typically include renewal options, escalation provisions and provisions
requiring tenants to reimburse the Joint Venture for a pro-rata share of operating costs incurred. All of the Joint Ventures leases are classified as operating leases, and the related rental income, including scheduled rental rate increases
(other than scheduled increases based on the Consumer Price Index) is recognized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the respective leases. Rents and tenant reimbursements collected in advance are recorded as deferred income in the
accompanying balance sheets. Lease termination income is recognized when the tenant loses the right to lease the space and the Joint Venture has satisfied all obligations under the related lease or lease termination agreement.

The Joint Venture records the sale of real estate assets pursuant to the provisions of the property, plant, and equipment accounting standard for real
estate sales. Accordingly, gains are recognized upon completing the sale and, among other things, determining the sale price and transferring all of the risks and rewards of ownership without significant continuing involvement with the seller.
Recognition of all or a portion of the gain would be deferred until both of these conditions are met. Losses are recognized in full as of the sale date.

Income Taxes

The Joint Venture is not subject to federal or state income taxes; therefore,
none have been provided for in the accompanying financial statements. The partners of Fund XIII and Piedmont OP are required to include their respective share of profits and losses from the Joint Venture in their individual income tax returns.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally
Accepted Accounting Principles (SFAS 168). SFAS 168 requires that the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the Codification or ASC) become the source of authoritative U.S. GAAP recognized by the FASB to be
applied by nongovernmental entities. Once the Codification is in effect, all of its content will carry the same level of authority, effectively superseding SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. SFAS 168
is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of SFAS 168 did not have a significant impact on the Joint Ventures financial statements or disclosures.

In September 2006, FASB issued ASC Topic Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (ASC 820), which defines fair value, establishes a
framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures required for fair value measurements under GAAP. ASC 820 emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement, as



Page F-27



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

opposed to an entity-specific measurement. In February 2008, the FASB delayed the effective date of ASC 820 for all nonrecurring non-financial assets and liabilities until fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2008. The Joint Venture adopted the guidelines under ASC 820 effective January 1, 2008, as it relates to financial instruments and effective January 1, 2009, as it relates to non-financial
instruments. The adoption of ASC 820 for nonrecurring non-financial assets and liabilities did not have a material impact on the Joint Ventures financial statements or disclosures.

In May 2009, the FASB issued ASC Topic Subsequent Events(ASC 855). ASC 855 provides guidance on managements assessment of subsequent events. ASC 855 states that management must
evaluate, as of each reporting period, events or transactions that occur after the balance sheet date through the date that the financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. ASC 855 allows the assessment of subsequent
events to occur through the date on which the financial statements are available to be issued or the date they are issued. Management must perform its assessment for both interim and annual financial reporting periods. ASC 855 was
effective prospectively for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of ASC 855 did not have a material impact on the Joint Ventures financial statements or disclosures.



|3. | RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS
|-- | --------------------------

Management
and Leasing Fees

Fund XIII is a party to individual property management and leasing agreements with Wells Management Company, Inc.
(Wells Management), an affiliate of each of its general partners.

The various fees payable under each of the respective
agreements are summarized as follows:



|          |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |  |                                                                                                                                                                   
|--------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|          |  | Management and Leasing Services                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |  | Management and Leasing ServicesIndustrial andCommercial properties leased on a net basis for ten years or more                                                   
|Fund XIII |  | Lesser of market rate charged for similar services for similar properties in the same geographic area, or 4.5% of gross revenues generally
paid over the life of the lease, plus an additional initial lease up fee for newly constructed properties based on market rate charged for similar services for similar properties in the same geographic area. |  | Initial lease up fee based on 3% of the gross revenues over the first five years of the lease term. Recurring fee based on 1% of gross
revenues collected monthly.

Management and leasing fees are recognized in accordance with the terms of the aforementioned
agreements, weighted based on joint venture partners respective ownership interests in the Joint Venture. During the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, the Joint Venture incurred management and leasing fees that are payable to Wells
Management of $38,984, $43,518, and $98,209, respectively.

In addition, the Joint Venture incurs fees payable to Piedmont Office Management,
LLC (Piedmont Management), or its affiliates, for the management and leasing of the Joint Ventures properties equal to (a) the lesser of 4.5% of the gross revenues generally paid over the life of the lease or 0.6% of net asset
value calculated on an annual basis, (b) prorated by Piedmont OPs ownership interest in the Joint Venture. During the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, the Joint Venture incurred management and leasing fee expenses
payable to Piedmont Management, or its affiliates, of $234,700, $246,294, and $163,600, respectively.

Administrative Reimbursements

Wells Management performs certain administrative services for the Joint Ventures properties, relating to accounting, property
management, and other partnership administration, and incurs the related expenses. Such expenses are allocated among these entities based on time spent on each entity by individual personnel. In the



Page F-28



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

opinion of management, this is a reasonable estimation of such expenses. During the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, the Joint Venture incurred administrative expenses of $0,
$0, and $14,257, respectively, payable to Wells Management for these services.

In addition, Piedmont Management also performs certain
administrative services for the Joint Venture and incurs the related expense. During the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, the Joint Venture incurred administrative expenses of $82,519, $85,734, and $56,017, respectively, payable
to Piedmont Management, or its affiliates, for these services.

Due to Affiliates

As presented in the accompanying balance sheets, due to affiliates as of December 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 represents amounts due to Piedmont
Management and/or Wells Management for the following items:



|                              |  |      |        |      |   |       
|----------------------------- |  | ---- | ------ | ---- | - | ------
|                              |  | 2009 |        | 2008
|Property management fees      |  | $    | 42,482 |      | $ | 24,492
|Administrative reimbursements |  |      | 8,176  |      |   | 18,636
|                              |  |      |        |      |   |       
|                              |  | $    | 50,658 |      | $ | 43,128
|                              |  |      |        |      |   |       



|4. | DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
|-- | -----------------------

In accordance
with the provisions of the property, plant, and equipment accounting standard for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets, the Joint Venture has classified the results of operations related to the office components of the AmeriCredit
Building and the John Wiley Building, which were sold on April 13, 2005, as discontinued operations in the accompanying statements of operations. The details comprising income from discontinued operations are presented below:



|                                    |  |      |  |      |  |      |       
|----------------------------------- |  | ---- |  | ---- |  | ---- | ------
|                                    |  | 2009 |  | 2008 |  | 2007
|Interest and other income           |  | $0   |  | $0   |  | $    | 26,198
|                                    |  |      |  |      |  |      |       
|Total revenues                      |  | 0    |  | 0    |  |      | 26,198
|                                    |  |      | 
|Operating income                    |  | 0    |  | 0    |  |      | 26,198
|                                    |  |      |  |      |  |      |       
|Income from discontinued operations |  | $0   |  | $0   |  | $    | 26,198
|                                    |  |      |  |      |  |      |       



|5. | RENTAL INCOME
|-- | -------------

The future contractual
rental income due to the Joint Venture under non-cancelable operating leases as of December 31, 2009 follows:



|                        |  |   |          
|----------------------- |  | - | ---------
|Year ended December 31: |  |   |          
|2010                    |  | $ | 3,973,700
|2011                    |  |   | 1,461,219
|Thereafter              |  |   | 0        
|                        |  |   |          
|                        |  | $ | 5,434,919
|                        |  |   |          

Two tenants generated approximately 64% and 36% of contractual rental
income for the year ended December 31, 2009, and two tenants will generate approximately 53% and 47% of future contractual rental income.



Page F-29



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

WELLS FUND XIII  REIT JOINT VENTURE PARTNERSHIP

SCHEDULE III  REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION

DECEMBER 31, 2009



|                          |  |              |  |                           |           |                                             |      |            |                                               |   |                                          |   |                         |   |              |  |   |            |  |   |           |  |    |  |   |            |  |   |           |  |      |  |         
|------------------------- |  | ------------ |  | ------------------------- | --------- | ------------------------------------------- | ---- | ---------- | --------------------------------------------- | - | ---------------------------------------- | - | ----------------------- | - | ------------ |  | - | ---------- |  | - | --------- |  | -- |  | - | ---------- |  | - | --------- |  | ---- |  | --------
|Description               |  | Encumbrances |  | Initial Cost              |           | CostsCapitalizedSubsequent ToAcquisition(c) |      |            | Gross Carrying Amount as of December 31, 2009 |   | AccumulatedDepreciation &Amortization(d) |   | Date ofConstruction     |   | DateAcquired
|                          |  | Land         |  | Buildings andImprovements |           |                                             | Land |            | Buildings andImprovements                     |   | IntangibleLease Asset                    |   | Constructionin Progress |   | Total        |  |   |           
|8560 UPLAND DRIVE(a)      |  | None         |  | $                         | 1,954,213 |                                             | $    | 11,215,621 |                                               | $ | 542,281                                  |   |                         | $ | 2,047,735    |  | $ | 11,664,380 |  | $ | 0         |  | $0 |  | $ | 13,712,115 |  | $ | 2,742,262 |  | 2001 |  | 12/21/01
|                          |  |              |  |                           |           |                                             |      |            |                                               |   |                                          |  
|AIU  CHICAGO BUILDING(b) |  | None         |  |                           | 600,000   |                                             |      | 22,681,602 |                                               |   | (1,848,537                               | ) |                         |   | 624,089      |  |   | 19,614,678 |  |   | 1,194,298 |  | 0  |  |   | 21,433,065 |  |   | 4,641,372 |  | 1999 |  | 9/19/03 
|                          |  |              |  |                           |           |                                             |      |            |                                               |   |                                          |   |                         |   |              |  |   |            |  |   |           |  |    |  |   |            |  |   |           |  |      |  |         
|Total                     |  |              |  | $                         | 2,554,213 |                                             | $    | 33,897,223 |                                               | $ | (1,306,256                               | ) |                         | $ | 2,671,824    |  | $ | 31,279,058 |  | $ | 1,194,298 |  | $0 |  | $ | 35,145,180 |  | $ | 7,383,634 |  |      |  |         
|                          |  |              |  |                           |           |                                             |      |            |                                               |   |                                          |   |                         |   |              |  |   |            |  |   |           |  |    |  |   |            |  |   |           |  |      |  |         



| | (a) | 8560 Upland Drive is comprised of two connected one-story office and assembly buildings located in Parker, Colorado.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | The AIU  Chicago Building is a four-story office building located in Hoffman Estates, Illinois.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (c) | Includes acquisition and advisory fees and acquisition expense reimbursements applied at acquisition as well as write-offs of fully
depreciated/amortized capitalized costs.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (d) | Buildings, land improvements, building improvements, and tenant improvements are depreciated using the straight-line method over 40 years, 20 years,
5 to 25 years, and the shorter of the economic life or corresponding lease terms, respectively.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Page F-30



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

WELLS FUND XIII  REIT JOINT VENTURE PARTNERSHIP

SCHEDULE III  REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

AND AMORTIZATION

DECEMBER 31, 2009



|                             |  |      |            |   |                                       |   |            |  
|---------------------------- |  | ---- | ---------- | - | ------------------------------------- | - | ---------- | -
|                             |  | Cost |            |   | AccumulatedDepreciation &Amortization |  
|BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2006 |  | $    | 38,421,549 |   |                                       | $ | 6,669,751  |  
|                             |  |     
|Additions                    |  |      | 0          |   |                                       |   | 1,657,134  |  
|                             |  |      |            |   |                                       |   |            |  
|BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2007 |  |      | 38,421,549 |   |                                       |   | 8,326,885  |  
|                             |  |     
|Additions                    |  |      | 0          |   |                                       |   | 1,327,814  |  
|Dispositions                 |  |      | (83,765    | ) |                                       |   | (83,765    | )
|                             |  |      |            |   |                                       |   |            |  
|BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2008 |  |      | 38,337,784 |   |                                       |   | 9,570,934  |  
|                             |  |     
|Additions                    |  |      | 0          |   |                                       |   | 1,005,304  |  
|Dispositions                 |  |      | (3,192,604 | ) |                                       |   | (3,192,604 | )
|                             |  |      |            |   |                                       |   |            |  
|BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2009 |  | $    | 35,145,180 |   |                                       | $ | 7,383,634  |  
|                             |  |      |            |   |                                       |   |            |  



Page F-31



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The General Partners of

Fund XIII
and Fund XIV Associates:

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Fund XIII and Fund XIV Associates (the Joint Venture)
as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related statements of operations, partners capital, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule
listed in the index at Item 15(a). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Joint Ventures management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our
audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Joint Ventures internal control over
financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the
effectiveness of the Joint Ventures internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Fund XIII and Fund XIV
Associates as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2009, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in
our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

/s/    Frazier & Deeter, LLC

Atlanta, Georgia

March 18, 2010



Page F-32



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

FUND XIII AND FUND XIV ASSOCIATES

BALANCE SHEETS

DECEMBER 31, 2009 and 2008

ASSETS



|                                                                                                                                       |  |      |           |      |   |          
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | --------- | ---- | - | ---------
|                                                                                                                                       |  | 2009 |           | 2008
|Real estate assets, at cost:                                                                                                           |  |      |           |      |   |          
|Land                                                                                                                                   |  | $    | 2,031,250 |      | $ | 2,031,250
|Building and improvements, less accumulated depreciation of $1,197,784 and $1,004,591 at December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively      |  |      | 6,132,378 |      |   | 6,298,989
|Intangible lease assets, less accumulated amortization of $249,347 and $1,298,341 at December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively          |  |      | 134,781   |      |   | 333,359  
|Construction in progress                                                                                                               |  |      | 0         |      |   | 29,902   
|                                                                                                                                       |  |      |           |      |   |          
|Total real estate assets                                                                                                               |  |      | 8,298,409 |      |   | 8,693,500
|                                                                                                                                       |  |     
|Cash and cash equivalents                                                                                                              |  |      | 362,687   |      |   | 497,355  
|Tenant receivables                                                                                                                     |  |      | 77,331    |      |   | 123,572  
|Intangible lease origination costs, less accumulated amortization of $137,604 and $714,814 at December 31, 2009 and 2008,
respectively |  |      | 74,381    |      |   | 183,723  
|Deferred leasing costs, less accumulated amortization of $32,804 and $13,222 at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively               |  |      | 88,693    |      |   | 30,018   
|Other assets                                                                                                                           |  |      | 11,905    |      |   | 10,416   
|                                                                                                                                       |  |      |           |      |   |          
|Total assets                                                                                                                           |  | $    | 8,913,406 |      | $ | 9,538,584
|                                                                                                                                       |  |      |           |      |   |          

LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS CAPITAL



|                                                                    |  |   |           |  |   |          
|------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | - | --------- |  | - | ---------
|Liabilities:                                                        |  |   |           |  |   |          
|Accounts payable, accrued expenses and accrued capital expenditures |  | $ | 20,744    |  | $ | 72,034   
|Due to affiliate                                                    |  |   | 5,113     |  |   | 2,546    
|Deferred income                                                     |  |   | 59,991    |  |   | 127,293  
|Partnership distributions payable                                   |  |   | 288,744   |  |   | 319,594  
|                                                                    |  |   |           |  |   |          
|Total liabilities                                                   |  |   | 374,592   |  |   | 521,467  
|                                                                    |  |  
|Partners capital:                                                  |  |   |           |  |   |          
|Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P.                                   |  |   | 4,038,859 |  |   | 4,265,097
|Wells Real Estate Fund XIV, L.P.                                    |  |   | 4,499,955 |  |   | 4,752,020
|                                                                    |  |   |           |  |   |          
|Total partners capital                                             |  |   | 8,538,814 |  |   | 9,017,117
|                                                                    |  |   |           |  |   |          
|Total liabilities and partners capital                             |  | $ | 8,913,406 |  | $ | 9,538,584
|                                                                    |  |   |           |  |   |          

See accompanying notes.



Page F-33



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

FUND XIII AND FUND XIV ASSOCIATES

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED

DECEMBER 31, 2009, 2008, AND 2007



|                                           |  |      |           |      |   |           |      |  |   |          
|------------------------------------------ |  | ---- | --------- | ---- | - | --------- | ---- |  | - | ---------
|                                           |  | 2009 |           | 2008 |   |           | 2007
|REVENUES:                                  |  |      |           |      |   |           |      |  |   |          
|Rental income                              |  | $    | 1,213,635 |      | $ | 1,189,347 |      |  | $ | 1,118,033
|Tenant reimbursements                      |  |      | 371,805   |      |   | 392,007   |      |  |   | 330,892  
|Interest and other income                  |  |      | 675       |      |   | 8,021     |      |  |   | 21,007   
|                                           |  |      |           |      |   |           |      |  |   |          
|Total revenues                             |  |      | 1,586,115 |      |   | 1,589,375 |      |  |   | 1,469,932
|                                           |  |      |          
|EXPENSES:                                  |  |      |           |      |   |           |      |  |   |          
|Property operating costs                   |  |      | 343,816   |      |   | 389,435   |      |  |   | 308,521  
|Management and leasing fees:               |  |      |           |      |   |           |      |  |   |          
|Related-party                              |  |      | 35,827    |      |   | 30,859    |      |  |   | 31,868   
|Other                                      |  |      | 44,783    |      |   | 38,569    |      |  |   | 41,105   
|Depreciation                               |  |      | 193,193   |      |   | 177,958   |      |  |   | 175,360  
|Amortization                               |  |      | 317,840   |      |   | 388,797   |      |  |   | 445,665  
|General and administrative                 |  |      | 64,750    |      |   | 50,503    |      |  |   | 75,166   
|                                           |  |      |           |      |   |           |      |  |   |          
|Total expenses                             |  |      | 1,000,209 |      |   | 1,076,121 |      |  |   | 1,077,685
|                                           |  |      |           |      |   |           |      |  |   |          
|NET INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS      |  |      | 585,906   |      |   | 513,254   |      |  |   | 392,247  
|                                           |  |      |          
|DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS:                   |  |      |           |      |   |           |      |  |   |          
|Operating income (loss)                    |  |      | 0         |      |   | (855      | )    |  |   | 136,198  
|Gain on disposition                        |  |      | 0         |      |   | 0         |      |  |   | 5,104,046
|                                           |  |      |           |      |   |           |      |  |   |          
|Income (loss) from discontinued operations |  |      | 0         |      |   | (855      | )    |  |   | 5,240,244
|                                           |  |      |           |      |   |           |      |  |   |          
|NET INCOME                                 |  | $    | 585,906   |      | $ | 512,399   |      |  | $ | 5,632,491
|                                           |  |      |           |      |   |           |      |  |   |          

See accompanying notes.



Page F-34



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

FUND XIII AND FUND XIV ASSOCIATES

STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS CAPITAL

FOR THE YEARS ENDED

DECEMBER 31, 2009, 2008, AND 2007



|                           |  |                                |            |   |                                |   |             |                       |  |   |             |  
|-------------------------- |  | ------------------------------ | ---------- | - | ------------------------------ | - | ----------- | --------------------- |  | - | ----------- | -
|                           |  | Wells RealEstateFund XIII, L.P |            |   | Wells RealEstateFund XIV, L.P. |   |             | TotalPartnersCapital | 
|Balance, December 31, 2006 |  | $                              | 10,738,108 |   |                                | $ | 11,964,022  |                       |  | $ | 22,702,130  |  
|                           |  |                                |           
|Net income                 |  |                                | 2,664,168  |   |                                |   | 2,968,323   |                       |  |   | 5,632,491   |  
|Partnership contributions  |  |                                | 32,127     |   |                                |   | 35,795      |                       |  |   | 67,922      |  
|Partnership distributions  |  |                                | (8,998,099 | ) |                                |   | (10,025,366 | )                     |  |   | (19,023,465 | )
|                           |  |                                |            |   |                                |   |             |                       |  |   |             |  
|Balance, December 31, 2007 |  |                                | 4,436,304  |   |                                |   | 4,942,774   |                       |  |   | 9,379,078   |  
|                           |  |                                |           
|Net income                 |  |                                | 242,365    |   |                                |   | 270,034     |                       |  |   | 512,399     |  
|Partnership contributions  |  |                                | 63,293     |   |                                |   | 70,519      |                       |  |   | 133,812     |  
|Partnership distributions  |  |                                | (476,865   | ) |                                |   | (531,307    | )                     |  |   | (1,008,172  | )
|                           |  |                                |            |   |                                |   |             |                       |  |   |             |  
|Balance, December 31, 2008 |  |                                | 4,265,097  |   |                                |   | 4,752,020   |                       |  |   | 9,017,117   |  
|                           |  |                                |           
|Net income                 |  |                                | 277,133    |   |                                |   | 308,773     |                       |  |   | 585,906     |  
|Partnership distributions  |  |                                | (503,371   | ) |                                |   | (560,838    | )                     |  |   | (1,064,209  | )
|                           |  |                                |            |   |                                |   |             |                       |  |   |             |  
|Balance, December 31, 2009 |  | $                              | 4,038,859  |   |                                | $ | 4,499,955   |                       |  | $ | 8,538,814   |  
|                           |  |                                |            |   |                                |   |             |                       |  |   |             |  

See accompanying notes.



Page F-35



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

FUND XIII AND FUND XIV ASSOCIATES

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED

DECEMBER 31, 2009, 2008, AND 2007



|                                                                                  |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |             |  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ---------- | - | ---- | - | ---------- | ---- |  | - | ----------- | -
|                                                                                  |  | 2009 |            |   | 2008 |   |            | 2007 | 
|CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:                                             |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |             |  
|Net income                                                                        |  | $    | 585,906    |   |      | $ | 512,399    |      |  | $ | 5,632,491   |  
|Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |             |  
|Gain on disposition                                                               |  |      | 0          |   |      |   | 0          |      |  |   | (5,104,046  | )
|Depreciation                                                                      |  |      | 193,193    |   |      |   | 177,958    |      |  |   | 218,550     |  
|Amortization                                                                      |  |      | 327,502    |   |      |   | 400,596    |      |  |   | 530,449     |  
|Changes in assets and liabilities:                                                |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |             |  
|Decrease in tenant receivables                                                    |  |      | 46,241     |   |      |   | 45,800     |      |  |   | 47,513      |  
|Decrease (increase) in due from affiliate                                         |  |      | 0          |   |      |   | 2,911      |      |  |   | (2,911      | )
|(Increase) decrease in other assets                                               |  |      | (1,489     | ) |      |   | 2,645      |      |  |   | 876         |  
|(Decrease) increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses                      |  |      | (47,152    | ) |      |   | 10,043     |      |  |   | (13,727     | )
|Increase (decrease) in due to affiliate                                           |  |      | 2,567      |   |      |   | 2,546      |      |  |   | (4,094      | )
|(Decrease) increase in deferred income                                            |  |      | (67,302    | ) |      |   | (67,200    | )    |  |   | 47,435      |  
|                                                                                  |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |             |  
|Net cash provided by operating activities                                         |  |      | 1,039,466  |   |      |   | 1,087,698  |      |  |   | 1,352,536   |  
|                                                                                  |  |      |           
|CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:                                             |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |             |  
|Net proceeds from sale of real estate                                             |  |      | 0          |   |      |   | 0          |      |  |   | 17,715,680  |  
|Investment in real estate assets                                                  |  |      | (818       | ) |      |   | (230,764   | )    |  |   | (24,703     | )
|Payment of deferred leasing costs                                                 |  |      | (78,257    | ) |      |   | 0          |      |  |   | (43,240     | )
|                                                                                  |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |             |  
|Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities                               |  |      | (79,075    | ) |      |   | (230,764   | )    |  |   | 17,647,737  |  
|                                                                                  |  |      |           
|CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:                                             |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |             |  
|Net sale proceeds distributions to joint venture partners                         |  |      | 0          |   |      |   | 0          |      |  |   | (17,715,680 | )
|Distributions to joint venture partners in excess of accumulated earnings         |  |      | (1,095,059 | ) |      |   | (1,021,834 | )    |  |   | (1,528,812  | )
|Contributions from joint venture partners                                         |  |      | 0          |   |      |   | 130,991    |      |  |   | 67,380      |  
|                                                                                  |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |             |  
|Net cash used in financing activities                                             |  |      | (1,095,059 | ) |      |   | (890,843   | )    |  |   | (19,177,112 | )
|                                                                                  |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |             |  
|NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS                                         |  |      | (134,668   | ) |      |   | (33,909    | )    |  |   | (176,839    | )
|                                                                                  |  |      |           
|CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period                                    |  |      | 497,355    |   |      |   | 531,264    |      |  |   | 708,103     |  
|                                                                                  |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |             |  
|CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period                                          |  | $    | 362,687    |   |      | $ | 497,355    |      |  | $ | 531,264     |  
|                                                                                  |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |             |  
|                                                                                  |  |      |           
|SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:            |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |             |  
|Deferred project costs applied to the joint venture                               |  | $    | 0          |   |      | $ | 2,821      |      |  | $ | 542         |  
|                                                                                  |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |             |  
|Partnership distributions payable                                                 |  | $    | 288,744    |   |      | $ | 319,594    |      |  | $ | 333,256     |  
|                                                                                  |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |             |  
|Accrued capital expenditures                                                      |  | $    | 0          |   |      | $ | 4,138      |      |  | $ | 0           |  
|                                                                                  |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |             |  

See accompanying notes.



Page F-36



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

FUND XIII AND FUND XIV ASSOCIATES

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007



|1. | ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS
|-- | -------------------------

On
August 20, 2003, Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P. (Fund XIII) and Wells Real Estate Fund XIV, L.P. (Fund XIV) entered into a Georgia general partnership to form Fund XIII and Fund XIV Associates (the Joint
Venture). The general partners of Fund XIII and Fund XIV are Leo F. Wells, III and Wells Capital, Inc. (Wells Capital).

The Joint Venture was formed to acquire and operate commercial real properties, including properties to be developed, currently under development or construction, newly constructed or having operating histories. On October 30, 2003,
the Joint Venture purchased two single-story office buildings containing approximately 82,000-square-feet, the Siemens  Orlando Building, located in Orlando, Florida. On December 19, 2003, the Joint Venture acquired the Randstad 
Atlanta Building, a four-story office building containing approximately 65,000 aggregate rentable square feet located in Atlanta, Georgia. On March 26, 2004, the Joint Venture purchased an approximate 120,000-square-foot, one story office and
warehouse building, 7500 Setzler Parkway, located in Brooklyn Park, Minnesota. Ownership interests were recomputed based on relative cumulative capital contributions from the joint venture partners.

On January 31, 2007, the Joint Venture sold 7500 Setzler Parkway to an unrelated third party for a gross sale price of $8,950,000. As a result of the
sale, the Joint Venture recognized a gain of approximately $2,166,000 and received net sale proceeds of approximately $8,723,000.

On
April 24, 2007, the Joint Venture sold the Randstad  Atlanta Building to an unrelated third party for a gross sale price of $9,250,000. As a result of the sale, the Joint Venture recognized a gain of approximately $2,938,000 and received
net sale proceeds of approximately $8,993,000.



|2. | SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|-- | ------------------------------------------

Basis of Presentation

The Joint Ventures financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles (GAAP).

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the Joint Ventures financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities,
revenues, and expenses and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Real Estate Assets

Investment in Real Estate Assets

Real estate assets are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Amounts capitalized to real estate assets consist of the cost of
acquisition or construction, application of acquisition fees incurred, and any tenant improvements or major improvements and betterments which extend the useful life of the related asset. The Joint Venture considers the period of future benefit of
the asset to determine the appropriate useful lives. These assessments have a direct impact on net income. Upon receiving notification of a tenants intention to terminate a lease, undepreciated tenant improvements and intangible lease assets
are written off to lease termination expense. All repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred.



Page F-37



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

The Joint Ventures real estate assets are depreciated or amortized using the straight-line method over
the following useful lives:



|                        |  |                                       
|----------------------- |  | --------------------------------------
|Buildings               |  | 40 years                              
|Building improvements   |  | 5-25 years                            
|Land improvements       |  | 20 years                              
|Tenant improvements     |  | Shorter of lease term or economic life
|Intangible lease assets |  | Lease term                            

Evaluating the Recoverability of Real
Estate Assets

Management continually monitors events and changes in circumstances that could indicate that the carrying amounts of the
real estate assets and related intangible assets owned by the Joint Venture may not be recoverable. When indicators of potential impairment are present, which suggest that the carrying amounts of the real estate assets and related intangible assets
may not be recoverable, management assesses the recoverability of the real estate assets and related intangible assets by determining whether the respective carrying values will be recovered through the estimated undiscounted future operating cash
flows expected from the use of the assets and their eventual disposition for assets held for use, or with the estimated fair values, less costs to sell, for assets held for sale. In the event that the expected undiscounted future cash flows for
assets held for use, or the estimated fair value, less costs to sell, for assets held for sale, do not exceed the respective assets carrying values, management adjusts the real estate assets and related intangible assets to the respective
estimated fair values, pursuant of the provisions of the property, plant, and equipment accounting standard for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets, and recognizes an impairment loss. Estimated fair values are determined based on
the following information, dependent upon availability: (i) recently quoted market price(s) for the subject property, or highly comparable properties, under sufficiently active and normal market conditions, or (ii) the present value of
future cash flows, including estimated residual value. The Joint Venture has determined that there has been no impairment in the carrying value of any of the real estate assets held as of December 31, 2009.

While various techniques and assumptions can be used to estimate fair value depending on the nature of the asset or liability, the accounting standard for
fair value measurements and disclosures describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Joint Venture has the
ability to access. Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs may include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in
active markets, as well as inputs that are observable for the asset or liability (other than quoted prices), such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates, and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals. Level 3 inputs are
unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, which is typically based on an entitys own assumptions, as there is little, if any, related market activity or information. In instances where the determination of the fair value measurement is
based on inputs from different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the entire fair value measurement falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its
entirety. The Joint Ventures assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the asset or liability. The accounting standard for fair value
measurements and disclosures was applied to the Joint Ventures outstanding nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities effective January 1, 2009.

Allocation of Purchase Price of Acquired Assets

Upon acquisition, the Joint Venture
allocated the purchase price of properties to the identifiable tangible assets, which consist of land and building, and identifiable intangible assets and liabilities, which consist of the following items:



| |  |  | Direct costs associated with obtaining a new tenant, including commissions, tenant improvements and other direct costs are included in intangible lease
origination costs in the accompanying balance sheets and are amortized to expense over the remaining terms of the respective leases.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Page F-38



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

| |  |  | The value of opportunity costs associated with lost rentals avoided by acquiring an in-place lease are included in intangible lease assets in the
accompanying balance sheets and are amortized to expense over the remaining terms of the respective leases.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | The value of tenant relationships is included in intangible lease assets in the accompanying balance sheets and amortized to expense over the remaining
terms of the respective leases.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | The value of effective rental rates of in-place leases that are above or below the market rates of comparable leases is recorded as intangible lease
assets or liabilities and amortized as an adjustment to rental income over the remaining terms of the respective leases.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

During the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, the Joint Venture recognized the following amortization of intangible lease assets and liabilities:



|                                 |  |                                  |        |                                 |   |                                               |  |   |         |  |   |       
|-------------------------------- |  | -------------------------------- | ------ | ------------------------------- | - | --------------------------------------------- |  | - | ------- |  | - | ------
|                                 |  | Intangible Lease Assets          |        | IntangibleLeaseOriginationCosts |   | IntangibleBelow-MarketIn-Place LeaseLiability
|For the year ending December 31: |  | Above-MarketIn-Place LeaseAssets |        | AbsorptionPeriod Costs          |   |                                              
|2009                             |  | $                                | 9,662  |                                 | $ | 188,916                                       |  | $ | 109,342 |  | $ | 0     
|                                 |  |                                  |        |                                 |   |                                               |  |   |         |  |   |       
|2008                             |  | $                                | 11,799 |                                 | $ | 239,493                                       |  | $ | 138,351 |  | $ | 0     
|                                 |  |                                  |        |                                 |   |                                               |  |   |         |  |   |       
|2007                             |  | $                                | 22,289 |                                 | $ | 332,551                                       |  | $ | 194,900 |  | $ | 21,560
|                                 |  |                                  |        |                                 |   |                                               |  |   |         |  |   |       

As of December 31, 2009 and 2008, the Joint Venture had the
following gross intangible in-place lease assets and liabilities:



|     |  |                                   |        |                                   |   |           |  |   |        
|---- |  | --------------------------------- | ------ | --------------------------------- | - | --------- |  | - | -------
|     |  | Intangible Lease Assets           |        | Intangible LeaseOrigination Costs
|     |  | Above-MarketIn-Place Lease Assets |        | AbsorptionPeriod Costs            |  
|2009 |  | $                                 | 30,864 |                                   | $ | 353,264   |  | $ | 211,986
|     |  |                                   |        |                                   |   |           |  |   |        
|2008 |  | $                                 | 81,452 |                                   | $ | 1,550,248 |  | $ | 898,538
|     |  |                                   |        |                                   |   |           |  |   |        

The remaining net unamortized balance for intangible assets and
liability will be amortized as follows:



|                                 |  |                         |         |                                   |   |         |  |   |        
|-------------------------------- |  | ----------------------- | ------- | --------------------------------- | - | ------- |  | - | -------
|                                 |  | Intangible Lease Assets |         | Intangible LeaseOrigination Costs
|For the year ending December 31: |  | AbsorptionPeriod Costs  |         | Above-MarketIn-Place Lease Assets |  
|2010                             |  | $                       | 37,186  |                                   | $ | 3,249   |  | $ | 22,314 
|2011                             |  |                         | 37,186  |                                   |   | 3,249   |  |   | 22,314 
|2012                             |  |                         | 37,186  |                                   |   | 3,249   |  |   | 22,314 
|2013                             |  |                         | 12,394  |                                   |   | 1,082   |  |   | 7,439  
|Thereafter                       |  |                         | 0       |                                   |   | 0       |  |   | 0      
|                                 |  |                         |         |                                   |   |         |  |   |        
|                                 |  | $                       | 123,952 |                                   | $ | 10,829  |  | $ | 74,381 
|                                 |  |                         |         |                                   |   |         |  |   |        
|Average Amortization Period      |  |                         | 3 years |                                   |   | 3 years |  |   | 3 years

Evaluating the Recoverability
of Intangible Assets and Liabilities

The values of intangible lease assets and liabilities are determined based on assumptions made at the
time of acquisition and have defined useful lives, which correspond with the lease terms. There may be instances in which intangible lease assets and liabilities become impaired and the Joint Venture is required to expense the remaining asset
or liability immediately or over a shorter period of time. Lease restructurings, including but not



Page F-39



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

limited to lease terminations and lease extensions, may impact the value and useful life of in-place leases. In-place leases that are terminated, partially terminated, or
modified will be evaluated for impairment if the original in-place lease terms have been modified. In the event that the discounted cash flows of the original in-place lease stream do not exceed
the discounted modified in-place lease stream, the Joint Venture adjusts the carrying value of the intangible lease assets to the discounted cash flows and recognizes an impairment loss. For in-place lease
extensions that are executed more than one year prior to the original in-place lease expiration date, the useful life of the in-place lease will be extended over the new lease term with the
exception of those in-place lease components, such as lease commissions and tenant allowances, which have been renegotiated for the extended term. Renegotiated in-place lease components, such as lease commissions and tenant
allowances, will be amortized over the shorter of the useful life of the asset or the new lease term.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Joint Venture considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash
equivalents. Cash equivalents include cash and short-term investments. Short-term investments are stated at cost, which approximates fair value, and consist of investments in money market accounts.

Tenant Receivables

Tenant receivables are
comprised of rental and reimbursement billings due from tenants and the cumulative amount of future adjustments necessary to present rental income using the straight-line method. Upon receiving notification of a tenants intention to terminate
a lease, unamortized straight-line rent receivables are written off to lease termination expense. Tenant receivables are recorded at the original amount earned, less an allowance for any doubtful accounts, which approximates fair value. Management
assesses the collectibility of tenant receivables on an ongoing basis and provides for allowances as such balances, or portions thereof, become uncollectible. No such allowances have been recorded as of December 31, 2009 or 2008.

Deferred Leasing Costs, net

Deferred lease
costs may include (i) costs incurred to procure leases, which are capitalized and recognized as amortization expense on a straight-line basis over the terms of the lease, and (ii) common area maintenance costs that are recoverable from
tenants under the terms of the existing leases; such costs are capitalized and recognized as operating expenses over the shorter of the lease term or the recovery period provided for in the lease. The remaining unamortized balance of deferred
leasing costs will be amortized over a weighted-average period of approximately two years. Upon receiving notification of a tenants intention to terminate a lease, unamortized deferred leasing costs are written-off to lease termination
expense.

Other Assets

Other
assets as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 are comprised of the following items:



|                    |  |      |        |      |   |       
|------------------- |  | ---- | ------ | ---- | - | ------
|                    |  | 2009 |        | 2008
|Prepaid expenses    |  | $    | 5,341  |      | $ | 3,780 
|Utility deposits    |  |      | 6,564  |      |   | 6,564 
|Interest receivable |  |      | 0      |      |   | 72    
|                    |  |      |        |      |   |       
|Total               |  | $    | 11,905 |      | $ | 10,416
|                    |  |      |        |      |   |       

Prepaid expenses are recognized as the related services are provided.
Utility deposits represent cash deposits paid to utility companies. Interest receivable represents interest earned during the period presented, which will be received in the following month. Balances without a future economic benefit are written off
as they are identified.



Page F-40



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

Allocation of Income and Distributions

Pursuant to the terms of the joint venture agreement, income and distributions are allocated to the joint venture partners based upon their respective ownership interests as determined by relative
cumulative capital contributions, as defined. Fund XIII and Fund XIV held ownership interests in the Joint Venture of approximately 47% and 53%, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008. Net cash from operations is generally
distributed to the joint venture partners on a quarterly basis.

Revenue Recognition

The Joint Ventures leases typically include renewal options, escalation provisions and provisions requiring tenants to reimburse the Joint Venture for
a pro rata share of operating costs incurred. All of the Joint Ventures leases are classified as operating leases, and the related rental income, including scheduled rental rate increases (other than scheduled increases based on the Consumer
Price Index) is recognized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the respective leases. Rents and tenant reimbursements collected in advance are recorded as deferred income in the accompanying balance sheets. Lease termination income is
recognized when the tenant loses the right to lease the space and the Joint Venture has satisfied all obligations under the related lease or lease termination agreement.

The Joint Venture records the sale of real estate assets pursuant to the provisions of the property, plant, and equipment accounting standard for real estate sales. Accordingly, gains are
recognized upon completing the sale and, among other things, determining the sale price and transferring all of the risks and rewards of ownership without significant continuing involvement with the seller. Recognition of all or a portion of the
gain would be deferred until both of these conditions are met. Losses are recognized in full as of the sale date.

Income Taxes

The Joint Venture is not subject to federal or state income taxes; therefore, none have been provided for in the accompanying financial
statements. The partners of Fund XIII and Fund XIV are required to include their respective share of profits and losses from the Joint Venture in their individual income tax returns.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In
June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles (SFAS 168). SFAS 168 requires that the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the Codification or ASC) become the source of authoritative U.S. GAAP recognized by the FASB to be applied
by nongovernmental entities. Once the Codification is in effect, all of its content will carry the same level of authority, effectively superseding SFAS No. 162, The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.SFAS 168 is
effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The adoption of SFAS 168 did not have a significant impact on the Joint Ventures financial statements or disclosures.

In September 2006, FASB issued ASC Topic Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (ASC 820), which defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures required for fair value measurements under GAAP. ASC 820 emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement, as opposed to an entity-specific measurement. In
February 2008, the FASB delayed the effective date of ASC 820 for all nonrecurring non-financial assets and liabilities until fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. The Joint Venture adopted the guidelines under ASC 820 effective
January 1, 2008, as it relates to financial instruments and effective January 1, 2009, as it relates to non-financial instruments. The adoption of ASC 820 for nonrecurring non-financial assets and liabilities did not have a material impact
on the Joint Ventures financial statements or disclosures.



Page F-41



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

In May 2009, the FASB issued ASC Topic Subsequent Events(ASC 855). ASC 855 provides
guidance on managements assessment of subsequent events. ASC 855 states that management must evaluate, as of each reporting period, events or transactions that occur after the balance sheet date through the date that the financial
statements are issued or are available to be issued. ASC 855 allows the assessment of subsequent events to occur through the date on which the financial statements are available to be issued or the date they are issued. Management
must perform its assessment for both interim and annual financial reporting periods. ASC 855 was effective prospectively for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of ASC 855 did not have a material impact on the
Joint Ventures financial statements or disclosures.

Reclassifications

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform with the current years financial statement presentation.



|3. | RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS
|-- | --------------------------

Management
and Leasing Fees

Fund XIII and Fund XIV entered into property management and leasing agreements with Wells Management Company, Inc.
(Wells Management), an affiliate of their general partners. In accordance with the property management and leasing agreements, Wells Management receives compensation for the management and leasing of the Joint Ventures properties,
the Joint Venture will pay Wells Management management and leasing fees equal to the lesser of (a) fees that would be paid to a comparable outside firm, which is assessed periodically based on market studies; or (b) 4.5% of the gross
revenues generally paid over the life of the lease, plus a separate competitive fee for the one-time initial lease-up of newly constructed properties generally paid in conjunction with the receipt of the first months rent. In the case of
commercial properties which are leased on a long-term net basis (10 or more years), the maximum property management fee from such leases shall be 1% of the gross revenues generally paid over the life of the leases except for a one-time initial
leasing fee of 3% of the gross revenues on each lease payable over the first five full years of the original lease term. The Joint Venture incurred management and leasing fees that are payable to Wells Management of $35,827, $30,859, and $46,644 for
the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, respectively, portions of which are included in income (loss) from discontinued operations in the accompanying statements of operations.

Administrative Reimbursements

Wells
Management performs certain administrative services for the Joint Venture, relating to accounting, property management, and other joint venture administration, and incurs the related expenses. Such expenses are allocated among these entities based
on time spent on each entity by individual personnel. In the opinion of management, this is a reasonable estimation of such expense. During the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008, and 2007, the Joint Venture incurred administration expenses of
$0, $0, and $14,814, respectively, payable to Wells Management for these services, portions of which are included in income (loss) from discontinued operations in the accompanying statements of operations.

Deferred Project Costs

Fund XIII and Fund
XIV paid 3.5% of gross capital contributions to Wells Capital for acquisition and advisory services, subject to certain overall limitations provided in the respective partnership agreements. These fees were capitalized by Fund XIII and Fund XIV
as paid and allocated to specific properties upon acquisition by the Joint Venture or certain capital improvements thereafter. Accordingly, such deferred project costs are included in the capitalized assets of the Joint Venture.

Due to Affiliate

As presented in the
accompanying balance sheets, due to affiliate as of December 31, 2009 and 2008 represents property management fees due to Wells Management.



Page F-42



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

|4. | DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
|-- | -----------------------

In accordance
with the provisions of the property, plant, and equipment accounting standard for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets, the Joint Venture has classified the results of operations related 7500 Setzler Parkway, which was sold on
January 31, 2007, and the Randstad  Atlanta Building, which was sold on April 24, 2007, as discontinued operations in the accompanying statements of operations. The details comprising income (loss) from discontinued operations are
presented below:



|                                           |  |      |  |      |       |   |      |   |          
|------------------------------------------ |  | ---- |  | ---- | ----- | - | ---- | - | ---------
|                                           |  | 2009 |  | 2008 |       |   | 2007
|Rental income                              |  | $0   |  | $    | 0     |   |      | $ | 282,879  
|Reimbursement income                       |  | 0    |  |      | 496   |   |      |   | 77,624   
|                                           |  |      |  |      |       |   |      |   |          
|Total revenues                             |  | 0    |  |      | 496   |   |      |   | 360,503  
|                                           |  |      | 
|Property operating costs                   |  | 0    |  |      | 1,059 |   |      |   | 68,722   
|Management and leasing fees                |  | 0    |  |      | 0     |   |      |   | 14,775   
|Depreciation                               |  | 0    |  |      | 0     |   |      |   | 43,190   
|Amortization                               |  | 0    |  |      | 0     |   |      |   | 84,055   
|General and administrative                 |  | 0    |  |      | 292   |   |      |   | 13,563   
|                                           |  |      |  |      |       |   |      |   |          
|Total expenses                             |  | 0    |  |      | 1,351 |   |      |   | 224,305  
|                                           |  |      |  |      |       |   |      |   |          
|Operating income (loss)                    |  | 0    |  |      | (855  | ) |      |   | 136,198  
|Gain on disposition                        |  | 0    |  |      | 0     |   |      |   | 5,104,046
|                                           |  |      |  |      |       |   |      |   |          
|Income (loss) from discontinued operations |  | $0   |  | $    | (855  | ) |      | $ | 5,240,244
|                                           |  |      |  |      |       |   |      |   |          



|5. | RENTAL INCOME
|-- | -------------

The future contractual
rental income due to the Joint Venture under noncancelable operating leases as of December 31, 2009 is as follows:



|                        |  |   |          
|----------------------- |  | - | ---------
|Year ended December 31: |  |   |          
|2010                    |  | $ | 1,293,530
|2011                    |  |   | 1,088,576
|2012                    |  |   | 375,003  
|2013                    |  |   | 70,289   
|Thereafter              |  |   | 0        
|                        |  |   |          
|                        |  | $ | 2,827,398
|                        |  |   |          

Three tenants generated approximately 72%, 16%, and 12% of contractual
rental income for the year ended December 31, 2009, and three tenants will generate approximately 58%, 25%, and 17% of future contractual rental income.



Page F-43



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

FUND XIII AND FUND XIV ASSOCIATES

SCHEDULE III  REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION

DECEMBER 31, 2009



|                              |  |              |  |                           |  |                                             |      |                                             |                           |                                          |                       |                     |                         |              |       |    |  |            |  |            |  |      |  |           
|----------------------------- |  | ------------ |  | ------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------- | ---- | ------------------------------------------- | ------------------------- | ---------------------------------------- | --------------------- | ------------------- | ----------------------- | ------------ | ----- | -- |  | ---------- |  | ---------- |  | ---- |  | ----------
|Description                   |  | Encumbrances |  | Initial Cost              |  | CostsCapitalizedSubsequent ToAcquisition(b) |      | Gross Carrying Amounts of December 31, 2009 |                           | AccumulatedDepreciation &Amortization(c) |                       | Date ofConstruction |                         | DateAcquired
|                              |  | Land         |  | Buildings andImprovements |  |                                             | Land |                                             | Buildings andImprovements |                                          | IntangibleLease Asset |                     | Constructionin Progress |              | Total |    |  |           
|SIEMENS  ORLANDO BUILDING(a) |  | None         |  | $1,950,000                |  | $8,734,436                                  |      | $(938,896)                                  |                           | $2,031,250                               |                       | $7,330,162          |                         | $384,128     |       | $0 |  | $9,745,540 |  | $1,447,131 |  | 2001 |  | 10/30/2003



| | (a) | The Siemens  Orlando Building consists of two single-story office buildings located in Orlando, Florida.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | Includes acquisition and advisory fees and acquisition expense reimbursements applied at acquisition as well as write-offs of fully
depreciated/amortized capitalized costs.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (c) | Buildings, land improvements, building improvements, and tenant improvements are depreciated using the straight-line method over 40 years, 20 years,
5 to 25 years, and the shorter of the economic life or corresponding lease terms, respectively.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Page F-44



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

FUND XIII AND FUND XIV ASSOCIATES

SCHEDULE III  REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

AND AMORTIZATION

DECEMBER 31, 2009



|                             |  |      |             |   |                                       |   |            |  
|---------------------------- |  | ---- | ----------- | - | ------------------------------------- | - | ---------- | -
|                             |  | Cost |             |   | AccumulatedDepreciation &Amortization |  
|BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2006 |  | $    | 24,616,285  |   |                                       | $ | 3,079,119  |  
|                             |  |     
|Additions                    |  |      | 25,245      |   |                                       |   | 573,390    |  
|Dispositions                 |  |      | (13,882,821 | ) |                                       |   | (1,778,827 | )
|                             |  |      |             |   |                                       |   |            |  
|BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2007 |  |      | 10,758,709  |   |                                       |   | 1,873,682  |  
|                             |  |     
|Additions                    |  |      | 237,723     |   |                                       |   | 429,250    |  
|                             |  |      |             |   |                                       |   |            |  
|BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2008 |  |      | 10,996,432  |   |                                       |   | 2,302,932  |  
|                             |  |     
|Additions                    |  |      | 0           |   |                                       |   | 391,771    |  
|Dispositions                 |  |      | (1,250,892  | ) |                                       |   | (1,247,572 | )
|                             |  |      |             |   |                                       |   |            |  
|BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2009 |  | $    | 9,745,540   |   |                                       | $ | 1,447,131  |  
|                             |  |      |             |   |                                       |   |            |  



Page F-45



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

EXHIBIT INDEX

TO

2009 FORM 10-K

OF

WELLS
REAL ESTATE FUND XIII, L.P.

The following documents are filed as exhibits to this report. Those exhibits previously filed and
incorporated herein by reference are identified below by an asterisk. For each such asterisked exhibit, there is shown below the description of the previous filing. Exhibits which are not required for this report are omitted.



|              |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
|------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|ExhibitNumber |  | Description of Document                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
|              | 
|*3.1          |  | Agreement of Limited Partnership of Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P. (Exhibit 3.1 to Form S-11 Registration Statement of Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P., Commission File No.
333-48984)                                                            
|              | 
|*3.2          |  | Certificate of Limited Partnership of Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P. dated September 15, 1998 (Exhibit 3.2 to Form S-11 Registration Statement of Wells Real Estate
Fund XIII, L.P., Commission File No. 333-48984)                                 
|              | 
|*3.3          |  | Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Limited Partnership of Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P. dated October 20, 2000 (Exhibit 3.2(a) to Form S-11
Registration Statement of Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P., Commission File No. 333-48984)
|              | 
|*10.1         |  | Management and Leasing Agreement with Wells Management Company, Inc. (Exhibit 10.2 to Form S-11 Registration Statement of Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P., Commission
File No. 333-48984)                                                            
|              | 
|*10.2         |  | Joint Venture Partnership Agreement of Wells Fund XIII-REIT Joint Venture Partnership (Exhibit 10.85 to Form S-11 Registration Statement of Wells Real Estate Investment
Trust, Inc., Commission File No. 333-44900)                                   
|              | 
|*10.3         |  | Agreement for the Purchase and Sale of Property for the AmeriCredit Building (Exhibit 10.86 to Form S-11 Registration Statement of Wells Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc.,
Commission File No. 333-44900)                                            
|              | 
|*10.4         |  | Lease Agreement for the AmeriCredit Building (Exhibit 10.87 to Form S-11 Registration Statement of Wells Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., Commission File No.
333-44900)                                                                            
|              | 
|*10.5         |  | Purchase Agreement for the ADIC Buildings (Exhibit 10.6 to Form S-11 Registration Statement of Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P., Commission File No. 333-48984)                                                                                       
|              | 
|*10.6         |  | Purchase Agreement for land adjacent to the ADIC Buildings (Exhibit 10.7 to Form S-11 Registration Statement of Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P., Commission File No. 333-48984)                                                                      
|              | 
|*10.7         |  | Lease Agreement for the ADIC Buildings (Exhibit 10.8 to Form S-11 Registration Statement of Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P., Commission File No.
333-48984)                                                                                          
|              | 
|*10.8         |  | Purchase Agreement for the John Wiley Indianapolis Building (Exhibit 10.9 to Form S-11 Registration Statement of Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P., Commission File No. 333-48984)                                                                     
|              | 
|*10.9         |  | Lease Agreement with John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (Exhibit 10.10 to Form S-11 Registration Statement of Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P., Commission File No.
333-48984)                                                                                   
|              | 
|*10.10        |  | Amendment #2 to Lease Agreement with John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (Exhibit 10.11 to Form S-11 Registration Statement of Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P., Commission File No.
333-48984)                                                                   
|              | 
|*10.11        |  | Amendment #3 to Lease Agreement with John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (Exhibit 10.12 to Form S-11 Registration Statement of Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P., Commission File No.
333-48984)                                                                   



---

##### Index to Financial Statements

|              |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
|------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|ExhibitNumber |  | Description of Document                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|              | 
|*10.12        |  | Purchase and Sale Agreement relating to the AIU Chicago Building (Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q of Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P. for the quarter ended September 30, 2003,
Commission File No. 0-49633)                                                                                                                                           
|              | 
|*10.13        |  | Lease Agreement with American InterContinental University, Inc. (Exhibit 10.2 to Form 10-Q of Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P. for the quarter ended September 30, 2003,
Commission File No. 0-49633)                                                                                                                                            
|              | 
|*10.14        |  | Agreement of Purchase and Sale of Property for Siemens Orlando Buildings and third amendment thereto (Exhibit 10.3 to Form S-11 Registration Statement of Wells Real Estate Fund
XIV, L.P., Commission File No. 333-101463)                                                                                                                       
|              | 
|*10.15        |  | Lease Agreement with Siemens Shared Services LLC (Exhibit 10.4 to Form S-11 Registration Statement of Wells Real Estate Fund XIV, L.P., Commission File No.
333-101463)                                                                                                                                                                           
|              | 
|*10.16        |  | Joint Venture Partnership Agreement of Fund XIII and Fund XIV Associates (Exhibit 10.16 to Form 10-K of Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P. for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2003, Commission File No. 0-49633)                                                                                                                               
|              | 
|*10.17        |  | Purchase and Sale Agreement for the Randstad Atlanta Building (Exhibit 10.17 to Form 10-K of Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P. for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2003, Commission File No. 0-49633)                                                                                                                                          
|              | 
|*10.18        |  | Lease Agreement for the Randstad Atlanta Building (Exhibit 10.18 to Form 10-K of Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, Commission File
No. 0-49633)                                                                                                                                                      
|              | 
|*10.19        |  | Purchase and Sale Agreement for the 7500 Setzler Parkway Building (Exhibit 10.8 to Form S-11 Registration Statement of Wells Real Estate Fund XIV, L.P., Commission File No.
333-101463)                                                                                                                                                          
|              | 
|*10.20        |  | Lease Agreement for the 7500 Setzler Parkway Building (Exhibit 10.9 to Form S-11 Registration Statement of Wells Real Estate Fund XIV, L.P., Commission File No.
333-101463)                                                                                                                                                                      
|              | 
|*10.21        |  | Purchase and Sale Agreement for the AmeriCredit Building and John Wiley Building (Exhibit 10.70 to Form 10-Q of Wells Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. for the quarter ended
March 31, 2005, Commission File No. 0-25739)                                                                                                                       
|              | 
|*10.22        |  | Purchase and Sale Agreement by and among Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P., Wells Real Estate Fund XIV, L.P. and AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III, L.P. for the sale of
the 7500 Setzler Parkway Building (Exhibit to Form 10-K of Wells Real Estate Fund. XIII, L.P. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, Commission File No. 0-49633)
|              | 
|*10.23        |  | Purchase and Sale Agreement for the sale of the Randstad Atlanta Building (Exhibit 10.2 to Form 10-Q of Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P. for the quarter ended March 31,
2007, Commission File No. 0-49633)                                                                                                                                      
|              | 
|*10.24        |  | Second Amendment to Lease Agreement with Siemens Shared Services, LLC (Exhibit 10.1 to Form 10-Q of Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P. for the quarter ended June 30, 2009,
Commission File No. 0-49633)                                                                                                                                           
|              | 
|31.1          |  | Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|              | 
|31.2          |  | Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|              | 
|32.1          |  | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002