alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

      I, Oscar Turner, certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Knockout Holdings,
Inc.;

      2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

      4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small
business issuer and have:

            (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer is made
known to us by others, particularly during the period in which this report is
being prepared;

            (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

            (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

      5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions);

            (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

            (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.

April 15, 2005

/s/ Oscar Turner
---------------------------
    Oscar Turner
    Chief Financial Officer
Before the Third Division,

January 19, 1945

No. 49959.

#### Protest 96349-K of Tupman Thurlow Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that the subject of Abstract 49414, the claim was sustained.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Duke Capital LLC (Duke Capital) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Keith G. Butler, Chief Financial Officer and Controller of Duke Capital, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Duke Capital.



|                      |  |  |  |                                       
|--------------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------
|                      |  | 
|Date: August 13, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/    KEITH G. BUTLER                
|                      |  |  |  | Keith G. Butler                       
|                      |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer and Controller
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

LINDA and STANLEY NELSON :

: CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-CV-4120

Plaintiffs, :

:

v. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION;

BAYER AG;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE;

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM

:

:

:

:

:

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

:

Defendants. :

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of the Court:

Kindly enter the appearances of Hope S. Freiwald, Aline Fairweather, Erin

Brennan and Kirstin J. Miller as attorneys for defendant SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a

GlaxoSmithKline.

Respectfully Submitted,

_____________________________ _____________________________

Hope S. Freiwald Aline Fairweather

_____________________________ _____________________________

Erin Brennan Kirstin J. Miller

DECHERT PRICE & RHOADS

4000 Bell Atlantic Tower

1717 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2793

(215) 994-4000

Case 2:02-cv-04120-HH Document 8 Filed 10/02/2002 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ELMO and OLIVIA DURAN :

: CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-CV-4314

Plaintiffs, :

:

v. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION;

BAYER AG;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE;

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM

:

:

:

:

:

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

:

Defendants. :

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of the Court:

Kindly enter the appearances of Hope S. Freiwald, Aline Fairweather, Erin

Brennan and Kirstin J. Miller as attorneys for defendant SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a

GlaxoSmithKline.

Respectfully Submitted,

_____________________________ _____________________________

Hope S. Freiwald Aline Fairweather

_____________________________ _____________________________

Erin Brennan Kirstin J. Miller

DECHERT PRICE & RHOADS

4000 Bell Atlantic Tower

1717 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2793

(215) 994-4000

Case 2:02-cv-04314-WY Document 7 Filed 09/20/2002 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ALBRIGHT :

:

 :

VS. : C.A. NO. 04-632

:

KELLOGG :

BEFORE WEINER, J.

AND NOW, this 3rd day of September, 2004, the aboveentitled matter is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The case is to

remain in status quo and the Statute of Limitations is tolled. 

This matter remains ACTIVE. It is further understood

that all discovery and settlement discussions will continue and

if intervention by the Court is needed or desired, the parties

may ask for assistance by either filing the appropriate motions,

writing to the Court or by setting a telephone conference. The

parties shall keep the Court advised of the status of this case

and may request a firm trial date or settlement conference by

writing directly to the Court or by setting a telephone

conference. 

ATTEST: OR BY THE COURT:

BY_______________________ ________________________

 COURT ROOM DEPUTY Charles R. Weiner, SJ 

 Sheila M. Jeffers 

Case 2:04-cv-00632-CRW Document 5 Filed 09/07/04 Page 1 of 1
January 26, 2017



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

KEN BIGHAM AND TRACY HOLLISTER , Appellant s
NO. 14

- 16

- 00482

- CV V.

SOUTHEAST TEXAS ENVI RONMENTAL LLC, ET AL , Appellee s

________________________________ Today the Court heard the parties ’ joint mot ion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment signed by the court below on March 15, 2016. Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED

. We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by appellant s , Ken Bigham and Tracy Hollister. We further order that mandate be issued immediately.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.
nxst-ex104_14.htm



Exhibit 10.4

AMENDMENT OF OPTION AGREEMENT

 

This Amendment to Stock Option Agreement (“Amendment”) is entered into as of November 30, 2020 by and between Mission Broadcasting, Inc. (“Mission”), Dennis Thatcher (“Thatcher”), Nancie J. Smith (“Smith”), and Nexstar Broadcasting, Inc. (“Nexstar”).  Each of the foregoing may be referred to herein as a “party” and collectively as the “parties.”

 

WHEREAS, Mission is the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) licensee of television broadcast stations located throughout the United States (the “Station”).

 

WHEREAS, Nexstar, Mission, Thatcher and Smith are parties that certain Stock Option Agreement dated as of November 29, 2011, as amended November 15., 2019, which outlines the terms and conditions upon which Nexstar may purchase the stock of Mission from Smith and Thatcher consistent with the rules and written policies of the FCC (the “Option Agreement”).  Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning assigned to such terms in the Option Agreement.

 

WHEREAS, the Option Agreement’s expiration date is November 30, 2020

 

WHEREAS, the parties desire to extend the Option Agreement for an additional eight (8) year term.

 

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows:

 


	
 
	
1.
	
Option Expiration Date.  The parties hereby agree to extend the expiration date of the Option Agreement to November 30, 2028.




 


	
 
	
2.
	
No Other Amendment.  No terms of the Stock Option Agreement, other than the Option Expiration Date, are amended or modified by this Amendment, and the Stock Option Agreement, as so extended hereby, remains in full force and effect.




 

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment as of the day and year first written above.

 

MISSION BROADCASTING, INC.NEXSTAR BROADCASTING, INC.

 

 


					
	
By:
	
/s/ Dennis Thatcher
	
 
	
By:
	
/s/ Thomas E. Carter

	
 
	
Dennis Thatcher
	
 
	
 
	
Thomas E. Carter

	
 
	
President
	
 
	
 
	
EVP & Chief Financial Officer

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 
	
 

	
 
	
/s/ Dennis Thatcher
	
 
	
 
	
/s/ Nancie J. Smith 

	
 
	
Dennis Thatcher
	
 
	
 
	
Nancie J. Smith
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Clifford W. Taylor,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Marilyn Kelly

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman,

 Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

October 18, 2006 

d1018 

Order 

 

October 18, 2006 

132216 & (21) 

CAPITOL CITY LODGE NO. 141 OF 

THE FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE, 

and LARRY HARRISON,, 

Plaintiffs-Appellants, 

v SC: 132216 

 COA: 272202 

Ingham CC: 06-000759-CL 

INGHAM COUNTY BOARD OF 

COMMISSIONERS and INGHAM 

COUNTY SHERIFF, 

Defendants-Appellees. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the motion for immediate consideration is GRANTED. 

The application for leave to appeal the September 22, 2006 order of the Court of Appeals 

is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question 

presented should be reviewed by this Court. 

 KELLY, J., would remand this case to the Court of Appeals for an explanation of 

its order.
FILEDlN WR-82, 103-01 

## COURTOFCrTmINALAPPEALS C0URT0F^'^T^TEXa! January 2 2015 Transmitted 1/2/2015 1:22:04 PM Accepted 1/2/2015 1:25:16 PM 

### ABELACOSTA, CLERK TOTHECOURTOFCRIMINALAPPEALS ABELA5°f IA CLERK WR-82, 103-01 Ex Parte On Application for a Writ ofHabeas Corpus Cause Number 1300886 in the 337th District Court from Harris County -+"0 

## ChristopherDowden C^^^ s Applicant's Motion To Extend Time To File Brief To The HonorableJudges OfThe CourtOfCriminalAppeals: Comes Now, Christopher Dowden, and files this his Motion to Extend Time to 

### File Brief, and in support thereof, would respectfully show the Court the following: I. This Court ordered briefing in this case from both parties to be due on December 30, 2014. No previous extensions have been requested. II. 

### Applicant's attorney requests this extension because in this past month, counsel has suffered a very unpleasant and lingering virus and counsel's child has also been ill, which has disrupted counsel's work schedule in addition to holiday obligations and 

### counsel's work on many cases including a trial setting on December 23, 2014. Counsel has also been working on the following matters:

• InreKC, Juvenile Trial Court No. 2012-04759J • CraigBeal, 01-12-00896-CR • AbnerWashington, 01-14-00885-CR
• ForestPenton, 14-14-00406-CR • Rodney Robins, 01-14-00582-CR 

### • Hugo Pachas-Luna, 01-14-00516-CR, et. seq.III. Appellee's attorney requests this extension of 30 days, which is necessary so that the brief can be thoroughly written and timely filed. This motion is not made for the purpose of delay. PRAYER Wherefore, Premises Considered, Applicant prays that this Honorable Court grants this requested extension of time to file the brief in the above cause and extend the time for filing to January 30, 2015. Respectfully submitted, Alexander Bunin Chief Public Defender Harris County, Texas / S/ c^a^aA Z/. 6%/a&a Sarah V. Wood Assistant Public Defender Harris County, Texas Texas Bar Number 24048898 

### 1201 Franklin, 13th Floor Houston Texas 77002 713.368.0016 (phone) 713.368.9278 (fax) 

### Sarah.Wood@pdo.hctx.net
Certificate of Service 

### By my signature below, I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing Appellee's Motion to Extend Time to File Brief has been served on Roe 

### Wilson, Assistant District Attorney of Harris County, Texas via the electronic e-file system.
Sarah V. Wood
Before the First Division,

June 21, 1944

No. 49531.

#### Petitions 6368-R, etc., of National Envelope Co. (Division of U. S. Envelope Co.) et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It appeared from the testimony of two witnesses for the petitioners that entry of the paper was made at the invoice prices, believed to be the correct dutiable values. The first witness stated that at or about the time of entry in this case petitioners placed an order with another company in Sweden for the same grade of paper and at the same price as involved herein. This order was received in evidence and marked exhibit 1. An examination of this exhibit indicated that the order was subsequently canceled due to the war. This witness further testified that shortly after this order was placed the petitioners were notified by the manufacturers in Sweden of an advance in price and that this was the first intimation they had of higher prices. When the collector filed appeals the petitioners stipulated at higher values. The second witness identified exhibit 1 as the order placed with his company, which was the second order referred to above. He stated that he believed the price listed thereon was the correct market value at the time and that the merchandise covered by that order was the same as that in the case at bar. From an examination of the record the court was satisfied that the entry of merchandise at a less value than that found on final appraisement was without intention to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts. The petitions were therefore granted.
No. 66745.

#### Chadwick Miller Importers, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 59/9779 (Los Angeles).

*448Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of vacuum brush cleaners similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Bruce Duncan Company, a/c Sims-Worms*v. *United States*(45 Cust. Ct. 85, C.D. 2202), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit-32.1 -- Certification per Sarbanes-Oxley Act (Section 906)

The undersigned, Tommy J. Gropp, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, of Shiprock, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)  the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB/A of the Company for the year ended
     December 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
     Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
     U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d); and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

Dated:  June 21, 2004

                                           /s/ Tommy J. Gropp
                                           ------------------------
                                               Tommy J. Gropp
                                               Chief Executive Officer
                                               Chief Financial Officer
#### BEARD v. UNITED STATES.

No. 45552.

United States Court of Claims.

April 5, 1948.

See also 110 Ct.Cl. 1, *76*F.Supp. 715.

Before WHALEY, Chief Justice, and WHITAKER, MADDEN, JONES, and LITTLETON, Judges.

WHITAKER, Judge.

Both .plaintiff and defendant have filed motions for a new trial. Plaintiff’s motion will be overruled for the reason set forth in our original opinion, Beard v. United States, 67 F.Supp. 963.

Defendant’s motion complains of the dismissal of its counterclaim. It was dismissed for the want of proof. This was erroneous. The case was referred to the commissioner under Rules of the Court of Claims, rule 39(b), 28 U.S.C.A. This rule provides for limiting the hearing before the commissioner “to the issue of whether or not the United States is liable for any portion of the moneys sought to be recovered therein.” Under it, therefore, the issue of the defendant’s right to recover on its counterclaim was not before the commissioner.

Defendant’s motion, for a new trial will be allowed and our order dismissing defendant’s counterclaim will be set aside and the case will be referred to the commissioner for the taking of proof on defendant’s counterclaim. It is so ordered.

MADDEN, JONES, LITTLETON, Judges, and WHALEY, Chief Justice, concur.
### ··:::;,t.{jl\!;FNT 

### Q\:



## .:**·;:~::_c~~:"J, ·R-_!,ATIO,~I**  . ' ' ',}' \ ' l\l U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
. ·- :**;~::** 

## l O?EHA**Tl0r·~3**

IN THE MATTER OF: RIAN C. SEEMAN. Respondent. OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, D.C. 

### ?[;2**"~P** 

### -- b /\ .{!: 

### 50

FAA Docket No. FAA-2012-0198 Judge J.E. Sullivan FAA CASE NO. 2011S0370103

MOTION FORLEAVE TO WITHDRAW COMPLAINT
The Complainant, by and through the undersigned attorney, hereby requests pursuant to Section 13.215 ofthe Board's Rules ofPractice [14 CFR 13.215] that the lawjudge approve withdrawal ofthe Complaint in the above-referenced matter.
The parties reached settlement ofthis matter on August 3, 2012. As a result, the Complainant requests that the Administrative Law Judge vacate the Order Granting Motion to Deem Allegations Admitted, Granting Default Judgment, and Assessing Civil Penalty issued August 31, 2012. The Complainant respectfully requests that its Complaint be withdrawn and this matter closed. Respectfully submitted this 5th day ofSeptember 2012.

RASHAWN RICH GEORGE Attorney Office ofthe Regional CounselCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that a copy ofthe Motion for Leave to Withdraw Complaint has been sent via facsimile and Federal Express to: The Honorable J.E. Sullivan DOT, Administrative LawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E. East Building Ground Floor Room E12-320 Washington, D.C. 20590 (FAX) (202) 366-7536 and Federal Express to: Rian C. Seeman 12433 Pineneedle Drive Indianapolis, IN 46236-3160 and the original and one copy viaFederal Express to: Hearing Docket U.S. Department ofTransportation Docket Operations, M-30 West Building Ground Floor Room W12-140 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, D.C. 20590

# ~~y~~ Legal Assistant 

### SEP 

## 5 2012 Dated
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1161 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to eliminate copayments by the 

Department of Veterans Affairs for medicines relating to preventive 

health services, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 17, 2017 

Ms. DUCKWORTH (for herself, Ms. COLLINS, and Mr. BLUMENTHAL) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Veterans’ Affairs 

A BILL 

To amend title 38, United States Code, to eliminate copayments by the Department of Veterans Affairs for medicines relating to preventive health services, and for other 

purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Veterans Preventive 

5 Health Coverage Fairness Act’’. 

2 

•S 1161 IS

1 SEC. 2. IMPROVEMENT TO PREVENTIVE HEALTH SERVICES 

2 FURNISHED BY DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS 

3 AFFAIRS. 

4 (a) ELIMINATION OF MEDICATION COPAYMENTS.— 

5 Section 1722A(a)(3) of title 38, United States Code, is 

6 amended— 

7 (1) in subparagraph (C), by striking ‘‘or’’; 

8 (2) in subparagraph (D), by striking the period 

9 at the end and inserting ‘‘; or’’; and 

10 (3) by adding at the end the following new sub11 paragraph: 

12 ‘‘(E) to medication that is or is part of a pre13 ventive health service.’’. 

14 (b) ELIMINATION OF HOSPITAL CARE AND MEDICAL

15 SERVICES COPAYMENTS.—Section 1710 of such title is 

16 amended— 

17 (1) in subsection (f)— 

18 (A) by redesignating paragraph (5) as 

19 paragraph (6); and 

20 (B) by inserting after paragraph (4) the 

21 following new paragraph (5): 

22 ‘‘(5) A veteran shall not be liable to the United States 

23 under this subsection for any amounts for preventive 

24 health services.’’; and 

25 (2) in subsection (g)(3), by adding at the end 

26 the following new subparagraph: 

3 

•S 1161 IS

1 ‘‘(C) Preventive health services.’’. 

2 (c) DEFINITION.—Section 1701(9) of such title is 

3 amended— 

4 (1) in subparagraph (J), by striking ‘‘; and’’ 

5 and inserting a semicolon; 

6 (2) by redesignating subparagraph (K) as sub7 paragraph (N); and 

8 (3) by inserting after subparagraph (J) the fol9 lowing new subparagraphs: 

10 ‘‘(K) evidence-based items or services that 

11 have in effect a rating of ‘A’ or ‘B’ in the cur12 rent recommendations of the United States Pre13 ventive Services Task Force; 

14 ‘‘(L) immunizations that have in effect a 

15 recommendation from the Advisory Committee 

16 on Immunization Practices of the Centers for 

17 Disease Control and Prevention with respect to 

18 the individual involved; 

19 ‘‘(M) with respect to services for women, 

20 the preventive care and screenings provided for 

21 in the Health Resources and Services Adminis22 tration Preventive Services Guidelines in effect 

23 as of January 1, 2017; and’’. 

Æ
**EXHIBIT 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS**We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-3 (Nos.333-134911, 333-149170) and Form S-8 (No. 333-106311) of our report dated March 10, 2008, relatingto the consolidated financial statements and internal control over financial reporting of GMXResources Inc. and Subsidiaries, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year endedDecember 31, 2007 and to the reference to us under the heading “Experts” in such Prospectus.          /s/ Smith, Carney & Co., p.c.   Smith, Carney & Co., p.c.      Oklahoma City, OK