alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Order entered April 11, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-18-01366-CR

DAVID GARCIA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F18-52886-H

ORDER

Before the Court is court reporter Crystal R. Jones-Brown’s April 10, 2019 first request 

for an extension of time to file the reporter’s record. We GRANT the request and ORDER the 

reporter’s record filed within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order.

/s/ LANA MYERS 

JUSTICE
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

GEORGE IV AN LOPEZ 

CIVIL ACTION 

V. 

NO. 04-4181 

JEFFREY BEARD ET AL. 

ORDER 

AND NOW, this A ~y of May, 2019, upon consideration of Petitioner's Motion for 

Further Discovery Related to Whether Miguel Moreno Testified Pursuant to an Undisclosed Plea 

Agreement (ECF No. 110), and all documents submitted in support thereof and in opposition 

thereto, it is ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as 

follows: 

1. The Motion is GRANTED as to the following discovery, which shall be 

conducted as ORDERED herein: 

(a) Within forty-five (45) days of the date of this Order, counsel for the 

Commonwealth shall compile, and permit Petitioner's counsel to conduct a supervised inspection 

of, the complete file(s) generated by the Office of the Lehigh County District Attorney with 

respect to the prosecution of the Bolasky homicide and Miguel Moreno's cooperation therein. 

(b) Within twenty (20) days of the date of this Order, Petitioner's counsel may 

serve upon Earl Supplee, Esquire, process to conduct a supervised inspection of the complete 

file(s) for Miguel Moreno maintained by Attorney Supplee and/or the Office of the Lehigh 

County Public Defender, and to take the deposition of Attorney Supplee. The above-ordered 

inspection and deposition of Attorney Supplee shall be conducted within sixty (60) days of the 

date of this Order. 
(c) Within sixty (60) days of the date of this Order, Petitioner's counsel may 

conduct the videoconference deposition of Theodore Racines, Esquire. 

(d) Within thirty (30) days of the date of this Order, Petitioner's counsel may 

submit to this Court proposed interrogatories to be directed to the Honorable Robert L. 

Steinberg. The proposed interrogatories shall not be served upon Judge Steinberg until approved 

by this Court. 

2. The Motion is DENIED without prejudice as to the requested deposition of Judge 

Steinberg. 

IT IS SO ORDERED. 

BY THE COURT: 

2
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS4651 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
**EXHIBIT 32.1****CERTIFICATION**In connection with the Quarterly Report of Midwest Banc Holdings, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission onMay 9, 2006 (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                /s/James J. Giancola         Name: James J. Giancola    Title: President and      Chief Executive Officer    Date: May 9, 2006           /s/Daniel R. Kadolph         Name: Daniel R. Kadolph    Title: Senior Vice President and      Chief Financial Officer    Date: May 9, 2006
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

GENERAL REFRACTORIES COMPANY : CIVIL ACTION 

 :

v. :

 :

FIRST STATE INSURANCE CO., et al. : NO. 04-3509

ORDER

AND NOW, this 11 day of June, 2015, upon consideration of the parties’ respective th

papers and the record, it is hereby ORDERED that a decision on the “Motion for Declaratory 1

Relief” (doc. no. 647), which was submitted by Plaintiff, General Refractories Company

(“GRC”), is DENIED, without prejudice to plaintiff’s right to renew the motion, under Fed. R.

Civ. P. 50(a), for judgment as a matter of law, raising the legal question of estoppel and waiver

presented by GRC’s motion for summary judgment, as defined in the Memorandum that

accompanies this Order, at the close of the evidence at the trial scheduled for July 13, 2015.

BY THE COURT: 

_s/L. FelipeRestrepo____________________

L. FELIPE RESTREPO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff’s Motion and Brief (ECF document nos. 647, 647-1); Declaration of Michael Conley, 1

dated May 1, 2015 (doc. no. 657), with Exs. A-K (doc. nos. 657-1 through 657-11); Affidavit of Michael

Conley, dated Apr. 17, 2015 (doc. no. 646), with Exs. 1-8 (doc. nos. 646-1 through 646-8); Affidavit of

Michael Conley, dated Sept. 16, 2011, with Exs. 1 and 2 (doc. no. 364); and Defendant’s Response (doc. no.

652), with Exs. 1 and 2 (doc. nos. 652-1 through 652-2).
United States Department of Agriculture
United States Department of Agriculture
United States Department of Agriculture
# **Exhibit 31.1**

# ** **

# **CERTIFICATION**

# ** **

I,James L. Gallogly, certify that:

 

1.     I have reviewedthis Annual Report on Form 10-K of Chevron Phillips Chemical Company LLC;

 

2.     Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.     Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.     The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 

a)     Designed suchdisclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)    Evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c)     Disclosed inthis report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) that occurredduring the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected,or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and

 

5.     The registrant’s other certifying officerand I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal controlover financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committeeof registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):

 

a)     All significantdeficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

b)    Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

 
| Date:  February 25, 2005 | * * | */s/ James L. Gallogly*               |
|-------------------------------|----------|---------------------------------------|
|                          |     | James L. Gallogly                     |
|                          |     | President and Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
Order entered January 20, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 14
- 00896
- CV PIERRE INVESTMENTS, INC., Appellant
V. DAVID CORONA D/B/A C ORONA AND SON CONSTR UCTION, Appellee On Appeal from the 162nd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC 12
- 12422
- I 

### O RDER
We GRANT appellee’s January 15, 2015 second motion for an extension of time to file a brief TO THE EXTENT that appellee shall file a brief by FEBRUARY 17, 2015 . We caution appellee tha t no further extension of time will be granted absent extraordinary circumstances.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that on this date, the undersigned served the preceding Sur-Reply in

Support of Attorney Defendants’ Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File an Amended

Complaint and Attorney Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Count III of Plaintiff's Proposed

Amended Complaint, upon all parties to this action by depositing a copy hereof postage prepaid

in the United States mail addressed as follows:

Robert P. Brand, Esquire

1200 Walnut Street, 5th Floor

Philadelphia, PA 19107

Anthony Baratta, Esquire

Baratta & Russell, P.C.

The Loft at Mount Jolly

2661 Huntingdon Pike

Huntingdon Valley, PA 19006

Bayard H. Graf, Esquire

Graf & Graf, P.C.

162 Beaumont Road

Devon, PA 19333-1849

 

Date WILLIAM F. MCDEVITT

Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 52-2 Filed 03/01/2004 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA :

:

 v. : MAGISTRATE NO. 04-522M

:

LARKEN ROSE :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this ______ day of March, 2005, upon consideration of the motion of the

government to dismiss the Complaint and Warrant, it is hereby ORDERED that the Complaint

and Warrant filed in this matter are dismissed.

BY THE COURT:

HONORABLE PETER B. SCUDERI

United States Magistrate Judge

Case 2:04-mj-00522-UJ Document 25 Filed 03/15/05 Page 1 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA :

:

 v. : MAGISTRATE NO. 04-522M

:

LARKEN ROSE :

GOVERNMENT’S MOTION TO DISMISS

The government, by its counsel, Patrick L. Meehan, United States Attorney for the Eastern

District of Pennsylvania, and Michael L. Levy, Assistant United States Attorney, hereby moves

the court to dismiss the complaint and warrant because in the opinion of the attorneys for the

United States such dismissal is in the interests of justice.

Respectfully submitted,

PATRICK L. MEEHAN

United States Attorney

MICHAEL L. LEVY

Assistant United States Attorney

Chief, Computer Crimes

Case 2:04-mj-00522-UJ Document 25 Filed 03/15/05 Page 2 of 3
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I have served a copy of the Government’s Motion to Dismiss upon

the following by electronic filing:

Dennis J. Cogan, Esq.

Suite 2925

2000 Market Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103

MICHAEL L. LEVY

March 15, 2005

Case 2:04-mj-00522-UJ Document 25 Filed 03/15/05 Page 3 of 3
Exhibit 32.1

                           CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
           SECTION  906  OF  THE  SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT  OF  2002

     In connection with the Annual Report of On The Go Healthcare, Inc.
(the "Company") on  Form 10-KSB/A for the period ending July 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial and Accounting
Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 3(a) or 15(d) of
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Act  of  1934;  and

(2)  The  information  contained  in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the Company.



/s/  Stuart Turk
------------------------------------
By:  Stuart Turk
Chief  Executive  Officer


 /s/ Evan Schwartzberg
------------------------------------
By: Evan Schwartzberg
Chief Financial and Accounting Officer

November 16, 2004
<PAGE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, :

Plaintiff : CRIMINAL ACTION

: NO. 04-CR-647-1

v. :

: CIVIL ACTION

ENRIQUE IGLESIAS, : NO. 10-CV-0378

Defendant :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 22nd day of December, 2010, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that,

following careful consideration: 

1. Defendant's pro se Section 2255 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence

by a person in federal custody (Docket No. 04-CR-647-1, Document No. 102) is

DENIED;

2. Defendant’s pro se motion for discovery in support of his Section 2255 motion

(Docket No. 04-CR-647-1, Document No. 103) is DENIED. 

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Lawrence F. Stengel 

LAWRENCE F. STENGEL, J.
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS4649 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
EX-10.24





 Exhibit 10.24 

Spousal Consent 
 The
undersigned, Tingting HUANG, a People’s Republic of China (“China” or the “PRC”) citizen with PRC Identification Card No.: 35072119830805212X, is the lawful spouse of Yaona LIN, a PRC citizen with PRC Identification Card
No.: 330327198303300959. I hereby unconditionally and irrevocably agree to the execution of the following documents (hereinafter referred to as the “Transaction Documents”) by Yaona LIN on December 23, 2014, and the disposal of the
equity interests of Hangzhou Tuya Technology Co., Ltd. (“Hangzhou Tuya”) held by Yaona LIN and registered in his/her name according to the following documents: 
  

	 	(1)	 The Equity Interest Pledge Agreement entered into with Hangzhou Aixiangji Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter
referred to as the “WFOE”) and Hangzhou Tuya; 


  

	 	(2)	 The Exclusive Option Agreement entered into with the WFOE and Hangzhou Tuya; and 



 

	 	(3)	 The Power of Attorney executed by Yaona LIN. 



I hereby undertake not to make any assertions in connection with the equity interests of Hangzhou Tuya which are held by Yaona LIN. I hereby
further confirm that Yaona LIN can perform the Transaction Documents and further amend or terminate the Transaction Documents without the authorization or consent from me. 

I hereby undertake to execute all necessary documents and take all necessary actions to ensure appropriate performance of the Transaction
Documents (as may be amended from time to time). 












 I hereby agree and undertake that if I obtain any equity interests of Hangzhou Tuya which
are held by Yaona LIN for any reasons, I shall be bound by the Transaction Documents and the Exclusive Business Cooperation Agreement entered into between the WFOE and Hangzhou Tuya as of December 23, 2014 (the “Exclusive Business
Cooperation Agreement”) (as may be amended from time to time) and comply with the obligations thereunder as a shareholder of Hangzhou Tuya. For this purpose, upon the WFOE’s request, I shall sign a series of written documents in
substantially the same format and content as the Transaction Documents and the Exclusive Business Cooperation Agreement (as may be amended from time to time). 












 Hereby Confirm. 

 

			
	/s/ Tingting HUANG
	Name:	 	Tingting HUANG
	Date:	 	 December 23, 2014
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-6739

CEDRIC J. WEBB,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

D. A. BRAXTON, Warden,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District

Judge. (CA-00-816-7)

Submitted: July 12, 2001 Decided: July 20, 2001

Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Cedric J. Webb, Appellant Pro Se. Eugene Paul Murphy, OFFICE OF

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Cedric J. Webb seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion and find no reversible error. We decline to consider Webb’s claim, presented for the first time on appeal, that

the evidence was insufficient to sustain his conviction of possession with intent to distribute controlled substances. See Muth

v. United States, 1 F.3d 246, 250 (4th Cir. 1993). Accordingly, we

deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the

reasoning of the district court. See Webb v. Braxton, No. CA-00-

816-7 (W.D. Va. Feb. 6, 2001). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Certification of Nevada ClassicThoroughbreds, Inc.pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002regarding Annual Report on Form 10-Kfor the year ended June 30, 2023**

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), theundersigned officer of Nevada Classic Thoroughbreds, Inc., a Nevada corporation(the "Company"), does hereby certify that, based upon her knowledge:

1. The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30,2023 (the "Form 10-K") fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. Information contained in the Form 10-K fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

> 
Dated: October 15, 2023 

By: /s/ Pamela Brimhall 

 

________________________________________

 

Pamela Brimhall   Principal Financial Officer  Chief Accounting Officer/Acting Chief Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : Date of

: Notice: November 4, 2009

vs. :

:

KEVIN JENKINS : Criminal No. 04-506-2

#58608-066

TAKE NOTICE that the above-entitled case has been set for re-sentencing in the

United States District Court, United States Courthouse, 601 Market Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania,

on December 2, 2009 at 11:30 a.m. before the Honorable Berle M. Schiller , in Courtroom 13-B, 13th

Floor .

ALL DEFENDANTS ARE DIRECTED TO REPORT TO THE COURTROOM

ON THE DATE AND TIME STATED ABOVE. IF A DEFENDANT FAILS TO APPEAR AS

DIRECTED, THE BAIL MAY BE FORFEITED AND A BENCH WARRANT ISSUED.

If a defendant is presently in jail, the defendant or his counsel shall notify the

undersigned in writing immediately so that the necessary procedures can be taken to have the

defendant present in the courtroom.

Very truly yours,

 INTERPRETER REQUIRED

Chris Campoli

Deputy Clerk to Judge Berle M. Schiller

THIS PROCEEDING HAS BEEN RE-SCHEDULED FROM 

 Notice to: 

 Defendant

 Peter Levin, Esq., Defense Counsel (via fax)

 Robert A. Zauzmer, Esq. , A.U.S.A. (via e-mail)

 U.S. Marshal (via e-mail)

 Probation Office (via e-mail)

 Pretrial Services (via e-mail)

Cr 4 (rev. 8/97) Larry Bowman (via e-mail)

Case 2:04-cr-00506-BMS Document 264 Filed 11/05/09 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MARIA A. MONTEVERDE

: CIVIL ACTION

:

vs. :

: NO. 02-4214

PPL ELECTRIC UTILITIES CORPORATION

O R D E R

AND NOW, TO WIT: This 30th day of October, 2002,

it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above action has been settled

and upon Order of the Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1(b) of the Local Rules of

Civil Procedure of this Court (effective January 1, 1970), it is

ORDERED that the above action is DISMISSED with prejudice, pursuant to

agreement of counsel without costs.

MICHAEL E. KUNZ, Clerk of Court

BY: 

Carol D. James, 

 Deputy Clerk

faxed from chambers:

 Ian M. Ballard, Esq.

 Sidney L. Gold, Esq.

Civ 2 (7/95)

41(b).frm

Case 2:02-cv-04214-MAM Document 7 Filed 10/30/2002 Page 1 of 1
To: File From: Antonio Bouza Date: November 1, 2006 Subject: Edison Electric Institute and Energy Efficiency Stakeholders Meeting

On November 1, 2006, the Department of Energy (DOE) had an informal meeting in the Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Assistant Secretary's conference room with representatives from the Edison Electric Institute, the American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy and the Natural Resources Defense Council. The meeting started at 10:45 AM and ended at 11:30 AM. DOE is in the process of determining energy conservations standards for Distribution Transformers. The group representing DOE included Alexander A. Karsner, Warren Belmar, Lawrence Oliver, David Rodgers, Ronald Lewis and Antonio Bouza. The Edison Electric Institute was represented by Mike McGrath, Rick Tempchin and Steve Rosenstock. The American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy was represented by Steve Nadel. The Natural Resources Defense Council was represented by Kit Kennedy.

Edison Electric Institute and the other attending energy efficiency stakeholders told DOE that they were working on developing a consensus standard level for distribution transformers. They had a few questions related to the distribution transformer rulemaking and energy conservation rulemakings in general. DOE informed them that they should submit their questions about the distribution transformer rulemaking directly to the Distribution Transformer docket, following the usual procedures. To: From: Date: Subject: File Antonio Bouza November 1, 2006 Edison Electric Institute and EnergyEfficiency Stakeholders Meeting 

# #149

On November 1,2006,the Department ofEnergy (DOE) had an informal meeting in the Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Assistant Secretary's conference room with representatives from the Edison Electric Institute, the American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy and the Natural Resources Defense Council. The meeting started at 10:45 AM and ended at 11 :30 AM. DOE is in the process ofdetermining energy conservations standards for Distribution Transformers. The group representing DOE includedAlexanderA. Karsner, Warren Belmar, Lawrence Oliver, DavidRodgers, Ronald Lewis andAntonio Bouza. The Edison Electric Institute was represented byMike McGrath, RickTempchin and Steve Rosenstock. The American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy was representedby Steve Nadel. The Natural Resources Defense Council was representedby Kit Kennedy.

Edison Electric Institute and the other attending energy efficiency stakeholders told DOE that they were working on developing a consensus standard level for distribution transformers. They hada few questions related to the distribution transformerrulemaking and energy conservation rulemakings in general. DOE informed them that they should submittheir questions aboutthe distribution transformerrulemaking directly to the Distribution Transformerdocket, following the usual procedures.