alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                      34,398,271
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                         739,950
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             5,314,695
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                181,632,598
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                       2,738,352
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                         2,732,768
<LOANS>                                    528,440,507
<ALLOWANCE>                                (4,814,016)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             791,879,978
<DEPOSITS>                                 690,473,538
<SHORT-TERM>                                12,000,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          4,330,066
<LONG-TERM>                                 29,296,796
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    53,387,190
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,392,388
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             791,879,978
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             11,808,076
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            2,312,068
<INTEREST-OTHER>                               297,650
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            14,417,794
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           5,079,688
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             577,186
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        8,760,920
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  675,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              8,340,796
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              1,228,094
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   1,228,094
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   664,208
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.06
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    7.98
<LOANS-NON>                                  4,180,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                   640,000
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                             5,580,408
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             4,296,414
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  169,260
<RECOVERIES>                                    11,862
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            4,814,016
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                         4,814,016
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MICHELE RICCI : CIVIL ACTION

:

 VS. :

:

AETNA, INC., D/B/A :

AETNA U.S. HEALTHCARE AND :

AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY : NO. 02-CV-4330

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Theodore A. Schwartz, Esquire, hereby certify that a true and correct copy of 

United States Magistrate Judge M. Faith Angell’s Order of July 8, 2002 was mailed on July 

24, 2002 by U.S. Postal Service, First Class Mail, Postage Prepaid to counsel for Defendants 

as follows:

Patricia C. Collins, Esquire

Elliott, Reihner, Siedzikowski & Egan, P.C.

Union Meeting Corporate Center V

P.O. Box 3010

925 Harvest Drive

Blue Bell, PA 19422

 M. MARK MENDEL, LTD.

 BY: ____________________________________

THEODORE A. SCHWARTZ, ESQUIRE

ATTORNEY I.D. NO. 09256

KENNETH B. GREAR, ESQUIRE

ATTORNEY I.D. NO. 81608

ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF

1620 LOCUST STREET

PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-6392

TELEPHONE NO. (215) 732-7200

FAX NO. (215) 546-3277

DATE: _________________

G:\tas\Ricci\PLEADING S\PDF DOCU MEN TS\Certificate Service-Theodore A. Schwartz-7-25-02-July 8, 2002.wpd

Case 2:02-cv-04330-TJS Document 6 Filed 07/25/2002 Page 1 of 1
No. 56316.

protests 154219-K and 157850-K (New York).

#### Hermos Linen Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of ornamented articles (not wearing apparel), not in part of lace, lace fabrics, or lace articles, wholly or in chief value of rayon, and not provided for in any other subdivision of subparagraph (a) of paragraph 1529, as amended, *supra,*in respect of which a modified rate of duty is prescribed, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 64746.

#### The Durst Manufacturing Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 306600-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of “Twin Mix” of the same kind in all material respects as the articles the subject of *The Durst Manufacturing Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 280, C.D. 2142), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
May 22, 2003

Via Federal Express

Ms. Maria Monteverde

5632 Kart Drive

Wescosville, PA 18106

RE: Monteverde v. PPL Utilities

Dear Ms. Monteverde:

Please allow this letter to confirm our recent conversation wherein you indicated to me

that you no longer wished for this firm to continue to represent you, inasmuch as you had

retained new counsel, one Ira Weinstock, Esquire, in connection with the above-referenced

matter. 

Therefore, in accordance with your wishes, I have filed with the court a Motion of 

Plaintiff’s Counsel for Leave to Withdraw from Representation, in an attempt to accomplish the

same. 

Lastly, I have enclosed a copy of the Motion for your information.

If you should have any questions, please feel free to contact me.

Very truly yours,

SIDNEY L. GOLD

SLG/dr

Enclosures 

Case 2:02-cv-04214-MAM Document 17-2 Filed 05/22/2003 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:02-cv-04214-MAM Document 17-2 Filed 05/22/2003 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 13.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
 SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
 SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Alto Palermo S.A. (APSA) (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Alejandro G. Elsztain, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Alto Palermo S.A. (APSA)October 30, 2014.
By:
/s/ Alejandro G. ElsztainAlejandro G. ElsztainChief Executive Officer


This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except as to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
July 23 , 2013



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

JANICE JACKSON AND ALL OCCUPANTS , Appellant s

NO. 14

- 13

- 00304

- CV V.

HREAL COMPANY, LLC , Appel lee

________________________________ Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment signed by the court below on March 25, 2013. Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED

.
We furthe r order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by appellant s , Janice Jackson and all occupants, jointly and severally

. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

   Schedule of Year-To-Date Principal and Interest Distributions
                           to
                  Certificateholders
                                                                              Ending
Class                   Interest             Principal      Losses           Balance
<S>                     <C>                  <C>            <C>              <C>
A1                     6,835,348.47      13,128,028.80         0.00        128,871,971.20
A2                     1,100,061.07       1,473,838.91         0.00         21,166,161.10
A3                     1,473,838.91      (1,473,838.91)        0.00         30,311,838.90
A4                     1,258,249.99               0.00         0.00         25,165,000.00
A5                     1,289,600.00               0.00         0.00         26,000,000.00
A6                        23,450.00               0.00         0.00            469,000.00
B1                        44,748.77           5,158.91         0.00            892,041.08
B2                        31,960.55           3,684.62         0.00            637,115.38
B3                        31,965.62           3,685.24         0.00            637,216.42
IO                       457,707.18               0.00         0.00                  0.00
M1                       230,157.85          26,534.07         0.00          4,588,065.93
M2                       108,674.85          12,528.74         0.00          2,166,371.27
M3                        63,926.09           7,369.81         0.00          1,274,330.19
PO                             0.00          27,538.81         0.00            944,839.19
R                              0.63             100.00         0.00                  0.00

</TABLE>
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Report of ProtoKinetix, Inc., a Nevada corporation, (the
“Company”) on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I,
Ross L. Senior, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify
the following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:





1.
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





2.
            The
      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








/s/ Ross L.
Senior


Ross L.
Senior


President
and Chief Executive Officer





April 30,
2008
# United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 20-3336

___________________________ Earl Lee Hall, Jr. lllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff - Appellant

v. Tracy Taylor, Deputy, Dub Brassell Detention Center lllllllllllllllllllll Defendant - Appellee

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Pine Bluff

____________ Submitted: March 18, 2021 Filed: March 23, 2021 [Unpublished]

____________ Before GRUENDER, WOLLMAN, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges.

____________ PER CURIAM. Earl Lee Hall, Jr., appeals the district court’s adverse judgment following a bench trial in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. 1 Having reviewed the record, we conclude

1 The Honorable Beth Deere, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Hall’s motions for

appointment of counsel, see Patterson v. Kelley , 902 F.3d 845, 849-50 (8th Cir. 2018) (standard of review), or in addressing Hall’s requests for discovery, see Robinson v. Potter , 453 F.3d 990, 994-95 (8th Cir. 2006) (standard of review). Because Hall has failed to provide a transcript of the trial proceedings, this court cannot meaningfully review his challenge to the district court’s judgment. See Fed. R. App. P. 10(b) (discussing the appellant’s duty to order transcripts); Van Treese v. Blome , 7 F.3d 729, 729 (8th Cir. 1993) (per curiam) (explaining that the district court’s factual findings or evidence presented at trial could not be reviewed without a transcript); Schmid v. United Bhd. of Carpenters & Joiners of Am. , 827 F.2d 384, 386 (8th Cir. 1987) (per curiam) (explaining that, without a trial transcript, this court could not rule on the weight of the evidence). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

______________________________

-2-
Case 2:04-cr-00660-LDD Document 42 Filed 03/01/10 Page 1 of 1
STATE OF LOUISIANA VERSUS DARRYL SARTAIN 

# lROMM

NO. 2024 KW 0285


### MAY 20, 2024

In Re: Darryl Sartain, applying for 

### supervisory writs, 22nd

Judicial District Court, Parish of St. 

### Tammany, No. 2254-F-2021.
BEFORE: McCLENDON, HESTER, AND MILLER, JJ.

WRIT DENIED ON THE SHOWING MADE. Relator fails to 

### include the application 

### for postconviction relief, the State's answer, if any, the bill of 

### information, the Boykin transcript, pertinent district court minutes, 

### and any other portions of the 

### district court record that might support the claims raised in the writ application. Supplementation of this writ application 

## and/oran application for rehearingwill not be considered. See 

### Uniform Rules of Louisiana Courts of Appeal, Rules 2- 18. 7 & 4- 9. In the event 

### relator elects to file a new application with this court, 

## he maydo sowithout the necessityof obtaining a return 

### date. 

## Anyfuture filing on this issue should include the entire contents of this application, 

## the missing items noted above, and 

## acopyofthis ruling. PMC CHH SMM

RT OFAPPEAL, FIRST CIRCUIT

I 

### EPUTY CLERKOF COURT FOR THE COURT
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

: CIVIL ACTION NOS.

:

ROCHELLE : 02-3867

MONTGOMERY : 02-3889

HINES : 02-3901

KARI, et al. : 02-3926

HABERMAN : 02-3936

MILEY : 02-3951

FRANCO, et al. : 02-3975

DAVIS : 02-4113

RUSSELL, et al. : 02-4116

HERNANDEZ, et al. : 02-4126

QUILLEN, et al. : 02-4167

SIMMONS, et al. : 02-4174

BIEDERMAN : 02-4194

DRY, et al. : 02-4225

COOK : 02-4237

STEFAN, et al. : 02-4277

WALKER, et al. : 02-4283

DUNCAN, et al. : 02-4301

:

VS. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION, et al. :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of July, 2002, the Court having been previously

advised that the above action cannot proceed to trial and disposition because of the following

reason:

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending disposition of a related

action.

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending determination of

arbitration proceedings.

[ ] - Interlocutory appeal filed.

Case 2:02-cv-04283-SD Document 2 Filed 07/11/2002 Page 1 of 2
[ X ] - Other: Case is placed into suspense pending receipt of the Case

Transfer Order from the Judicial Panel on Multi District Litigation

transferring case to District of Minnesota.

It is

ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this action closed for statistical purposes and

place the matter in the Civil Suspense File, and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction; and that the case be

restored to the trial docket when the action is in a status so that it may proceed to final

disposition; this order shall not prejudice the rights of the parties to this litigation.

BY THE COURT:

________________________________________

Stewart Dalzell, S.J.

Case 2:02-cv-04283-SD Document 2 Filed 07/11/2002 Page 2 of 2
No. 57612.

#### President Novelty & Jewelry Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 121415-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliveb, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of shell strands the same in all material respects as the articles involved in *Puerto Rican Handcrafts*v. *United States*(30 Cust. Ct. 18, C. D. 1493), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS4707 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
Document

Exhibit 10.31


Summary of Director and Executive Officer Compensation Arrangements


    In addition to the compensation arrangements filed as other exhibits to this annual report, EnPro Industries, Inc. (the “Company”) has the following compensation arrangements with its directors and current executive officers who are named executive officers.


Compensation Arrangements for Directors


The Company has an arrangement to pay non-employee members of the Company’s board of directors compensation for their service on the board. Effective for 2021, each non-employee member of the Company’s board of directors receives an annual retainer of $200,000, $90,000 of which is paid in cash and $110,000 of which is paid in fully vested shares of our common stock. Directors who elect to defer receipt of the annual grant are paid in phantom shares of our common stock upon the director’s termination of service as a director in accordance with his or her election. The non-executive chairman of the board receives an additional quarterly fee of $22,500 for his service in that capacity and for his service as chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the chairman of the Audit and Risk Management Committee receives an additional annual fee of $20,000, and the chairman of the Compensation and Human Resources Committee receives an annual fee of $15,000.


Compensation Arrangements for Named Executive Officers


The Company’s chief executive officer and its other most highly compensated current executive officers who are named executive officers in the Company's proxy statement for its 2021 annual meeting of shareholders are all “at-will” employees who serve at the pleasure of the board of directors.  The board of directors sets the annual base salary for each of the named executive officers and has the discretion to change the salary of any of the officers at any time.  Effective as of April 1, 2021, the annual base salaries for these named executive officers are as follows:
						
	Named Executive Officer
	Base Salary

	Marvin A. Riley	$900,000
	J. Milton Childress II	$538,201
	Robert S. McLean	$438,781
	Susan E. Sweeney	$370,600
	Jerry L. Johnson	$376,980
Order entered July 10, 2015

In The 

## Court of Appeals **Fifth District of Texas at Dallas**
No. 05
- 14
- 01180
- CV
IN THE INTEREST OF M.A.A. , A CHILD On Appeal from the 382nd Judicial District Court Rockwall County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 01
- 09
- 843 

### O RDE R
We GRANT appellant’s July 8, 2015 motion to file an amended brief. We ORDER the amended brief tendered to this Court by appellant on July 8, 2015 filed as of the date of this order. Appellee’s brief is due THIRTY DAYS from the date of this order.

/s / ELIZABETH LANG

- MIERS JUSTICE
Opinion issued September 5, 2024

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The 

First District of Texas 

————————————

NO. 01-24-00099-CV

———————————

IN THE INTEREST OF V.A.L., A CHILD

On Appeal from the 507th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2022-47246

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellants have filed an unopposed motion to dismiss their appeal. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 10.3(a)(2), 42.1(a)(1). No opinion has issued. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.1(c). 

Accordingly, we grant appellants’ motion and dismiss their appeal. See TEX.

R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1). We also dismiss all other pending motions as moot. 
2

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Hightower and Countiss.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE: ASBESTOS PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

This document relates to:

 : CIVIL ACTION

02-2630 BONSTEIN : NO. MDL 875

02-2632 NEILSEN :

02-2634 UPDEGROVE :

02-2679 BONSTEIN :

02-2680 UPDEGROVE :

02-2681 SHIRK :

02-2682 BAREFIELD :

02-2734 PEARCE :

02-2763 HESS :

02-2764 HENDRICKS :

02-2818 PEARCE :

02-2842 DEVITO :

02-2843 WEINER :

02-2844 HARRY :

02-2884 KELLY :

02-2940 HOOD :

02-2966 ROCKS :

02-2967 HARTMANN :

02-2969 SAKEWICZ :

02-2970 SOLOMON :

02-2971 REED :

02-2973 JOHNSON :

02-2974 COLLIER :

02-2975 WEINER :

02-2976 HARRY :

02-2977 KINIUK :

02-3173 ZUCAL :

02-3174 COLLIER :

02-3176 ROMANOWSKI :

02-3532 ROMANOWSKI :

02-3533 O’DONNELL :

02-3556 PALMER :

02-3633 SNYDER :

02-3634 BUTLER :

02-3741 SNYDER :

02-3742 DANCSECS :

02-3832 MACAULEY :

02-3855 ROWLAND :

02-4025 ALIBERT :

02-4094 GRESH :

Case 2:02-cv-02763 Document 3 Filed 07/19/2002 Page 1 of 2
 

O R D E R

The Court having been advised that the issues raised in

each of these actions are also presently pending before the

Honorable District Court Judge Alfred Wolin. Judge Wolin has

been specially designated to sit in the District of Delaware and

preside over these matters. Further, the Judge has set a

schedule and will proceed appropriately. In the interest of

judicial economy and for a prompt resolution of all outstanding

issues this Court will hold its action in abeyance and await the

ruling by the Bankruptcy Court.

IT IS THEREFORE THE ORDER OF THIS COURT that all

pending motions for abstention and remand are denied without

prejudice at this time with leave to renew at a later date. The

cases are administratively dismissed, subject to reinstatement

following the determination of the bankruptcy issues by Judge

Wolin and any subsequent appeals thereto.

Done this 19th day of July, 2002.

 BY THE COURT

 

Charles R. Weiner, SJ

Case 2:02-cv-02763 Document 3 Filed 07/19/2002 Page 2 of 2
No. 56335.

protests 175786-K, etc. (New York).

#### Amtorg Trading Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
**Exhibit 23**
**Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 for theCompany’s Citizens First Savings Bank 401(k) Plan (Registration No. 333-74218), Citizens FirstBancorp, Inc. 2001 Stock-Based Incentive Plan (Registration No. 333-98199), Citizens First Bancorp,Inc. Management Restricted Stock Purchase Plan (Registration Nos. 333-100516 and 333-122417) and inthe Registration Statement on Form S-3 for the Citizens First Bancorp, Inc. Dividend Reinvestmentand Optional Cash Purchase Plan (Registration No. 333-122417) of our report dated April 26, 2005relating to the effectiveness of Citizen First Bancorp, Inc.’s internal control over financialreporting as of December 31, 2004, which is included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K/A, Amendment No. 1, for the year ended December 31, 2004.
/s/ BDO SEIDMAN, LLP
Grand Rapids, Michigan