alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the EnergySouth, Inc. (the Company) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, John S. Davis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:  1.
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date: February 2, 2005
    By:
    /s/ John S. DavisJohn S. DavisPresident and
Chief Executive Officer 38
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

OLYMPUS SERVICING

: CIVIL ACTION

:

vs. :

: NO. 02-4361

ALEXA M. LARGOZA

O R D E R

AND NOW, TO WIT: This 9th day of July, 2003, it having been reported that

the issues between the parties in the above action has been settled and upon Order of the Court

pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1(b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure of this Court , it

is

ORDERED that the above action is DISMISSED with prejudice, pursuant to

agreement of counsel without costs.

MICHAEL E. KUNZ, Clerk of Court

BY: 

 Christine L. Halligan 

 Deputy Clerk

cc: 7/9/03, clh, by mail:

 Joseph A. Ferry, Esquire

Mark J. Udren, Esquire

Case 2:02-cv-04361-CMR Document 4 Filed 07/09/2003 Page 1 of 1
No. 52911.

Suit 4597.

#### Paramount Pictures, Inc. *v.*United States.

C. D. 1098 affirmed January 5, 1949. C. A. D. 395.
(V. D. 34)

Entry No. 847604, etc.

#### S.E. Laszlo et al. *v.*United States

(Decided September 19, 1956)

*John D. Rode*for the plaintiffs.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

WilsoN, Judge:

These matters are presently before me on a remand from a classification proceeding decided by the first division of this court in *S. E. Laszlo et al.*v. *United States,*34 Cust. Ct. 376, Abstract 59071. The judgment entered therein stated: “* * * that the matters be remanded to a single judge in reappraisement pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d).”

The matters have been submitted for decision upon an agreed statement of facts entered into by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto.

Upon the agreed facts, I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (d)), to be the proper basis for determining the values of the involved merchandise and that such values are as follows:

*454Entry-No. Item Binoculars Case Total

847604 7 35_ $12. 20 $1. 00 $13. 20

74262 7 50 uncoatecL 12. 70 1. 20 13. 90

805967 7 50_ 13. 10 1. 20 14. 30

7 50_ 11. 30 1. 20 12. 50

10 50_ 11. 90 1. 20 13. 10

7 50 coated_ 12. 90 1. 20 14. 10

10 50_ 14. 80 1. 20 16. 00

I further find such values to be the dutiable values of said merchandise.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

: CIVIL ACTION NOS.

:

WILSON : 02-3878

RETES : 02-3888

LUX, et al. : 02-3904

JACKSON, et al. : 02-3921

GUZZETTA, et al. : 02-3960

FAGAN, et al. : 02-3965

GREEN : 02-3989

NELSON, et al. : 02-4120

ASHTON, et al. : 02-4155

MCNALLY, et al : 02-4159

EVERETT, et al. : 02-4191

CASTELAZ, et al. : 02-4192

PERRY : 02-4249

NAPIER, et al. : 02-4256

POWERS, et al. : 02-4260

SANTOS, et al. : 02-4272

PRICE : 02-4299

SHULDA : 02-4307

:

VS. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION, et al. :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of July, 2002, the Court having been previously

advised that the above action cannot proceed to trial and disposition because of the following

reason:

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending disposition of a related

action.

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending determination of

arbitration proceedings.

[ ] - Interlocutory appeal filed.

Case 2:02-cv-04307-HH Document 2 Filed 07/10/2002 Page 1 of 2
[ X ] - Other: Case is placed into suspense pending receipt of the Case

Transfer Order from the Judicial Panel on Multi District Litigation

transferring case to District of Minnesota.

It is

ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this action closed for statistical purposes and

place the matter in the Civil Suspense File, and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction; and that the case be

restored to the trial docket when the action is in a status so that it may proceed to final

disposition; this order shall not prejudice the rights of the parties to this litigation.

BY THE COURT:

________________________________________

Herbert J. Hutton, Judge

Case 2:02-cv-04307-HH Document 2 Filed 07/10/2002 Page 2 of 2
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

I,Wilson W. Cheung, certify that:

1. I have reviewedthis quarterly report on Form 10-Q of AXT, Inc.;

2. Based on myknowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, inlight of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on myknowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’sother certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluatedthe effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosedin this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’sother certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluationof internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors andthe audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors:

(a) Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize andreport financial information; and

(b) Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
| Dated: November 9, 2006 |   | By:    |   | /s/ Wilson W. Cheung    |
|------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|-------------------------|
|                         |   |   |   | Wilson W. Cheung        |
|                         |   |   |   | Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

January 27, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor, Chief Justice
129358 Michael F. Cavanagh Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee, Robert P. Young, Jr. Stephen J. Markman, Justices

v SC: 129358 COA: 261738 St. Clair CC: 03-001365-FH ROY STEPHEN HAMILTON, Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 5, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court. On the Court’s own motion, we REMAND this case to the St. Clair Circu it Court for correction of the judgment of sentence. Defendant was senten ced to a prison term of five years to forty years for his conviction for felonious assault, MCL 750.82, as a fourth hab itual offender, MCL 769.12. The maximum possible term of imprisonment fo r a fourth habitual offender convicted of felonious assault is fifteen y ears. MCL 769.12(1)(b). On remand, the trial court shall correct the judgment of sentence so that the maximum term of imprisonment for defendant’s felonious assault conviction is fifteen years.

p0124 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

January 27, 2006

Clerk
# C_2017269EN.01001501.xml

| 14.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 269/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 269/15

---

Judgment of the General Court of 27 June 2017 — Ruiz Molina v EUIPO

(Case T-233/16) (1)

1

((Appeal - Civil Service - Members of the temporary staff - Fixed-term contract with a termination clause ending the contract if the staff member’s name is not included on the reserve list of the next open competition - Termination of the contract by application of the termination clause - Reclassification of a fixed-term contract as a contract of unlimited duration - Res judicata - Clause 5(1) of the Framework Agreement on fixed- term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP - Obligation to state reasons))

(2017/C 269/20)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: José Luis Ruiz Molina (San Juan de Alicante, Spain) (represented by: N. Lhoëst and S. Michiels, lawyers)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: A. Lukošiūtė, acting as Agent, and B. Wägenbaur, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings:

Re:

Re:

Appeal brought against the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Third Chamber) of 2 March 2016, Ruiz Molina v OHMI (F 60/15, EU:F:2016:28) seeking to have that judgment set aside.

Ruiz Molina

OHMI

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Mr José Luis Ruiz Molina to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) in the appeal. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Mr José Luis Ruiz Molina to bear his own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) in the appeal.

---

(1)  OJ C 243, 4.7.2016.

1

---
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1122 

To amend the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 to clarify when 

the time period for the issuance of citations under such Act begins 

and to require a rule to clarify that an employer’s duty to make and 

maintain accurate records of work-related injuries and illnesses is an 

ongoing obligation. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 15, 2017 

Mrs. MURRAY (for herself, Mr. BLUMENTHAL, Mr. BROWN, Mrs. GILLIBRAND, 

Ms. WARREN, Mr. FRANKEN, and Ms. HASSAN) introduced the following 

bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions 

A BILL 

To amend the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 

to clarify when the time period for the issuance of citations under such Act begins and to require a rule to 

clarify that an employer’s duty to make and maintain 

accurate records of work-related injuries and illnesses 

is an ongoing obligation. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Accurate Workplace 

5 Injury and Illness Records Restoration Act’’. 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1122 IS

1 SEC. 2. PERIOD FOR ISSUANCE OF A CITATION. 

2 Section 9(c) of the Occupational Safety and Health 

3 Act of 1970 (29 U.S.C. 658(c)) is amended by adding at 

4 the end the following: ‘‘For purposes of this subsection, 

5 a violation continues to occur for as long as an employer 

6 has not satisfied the requirements, rules, standards, or7 ders, and regulations referenced in subsection (a).’’. 

8 SEC. 3. RULEMAKING. 

9 (a) RULE REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days after 

10 the date of enactment of this Act, the Occupational Safety 

11 and Health Administration shall issue a final rule amend12 ing its recordkeeping regulations under section 8(c) of the 

13 Occupational Safety and Health Act to clarify that— 

14 (1) the duty to make and maintain accurate 

15 records of work-related injuries and illnesses is an 

16 ongoing obligation; 

17 (2) the duty to make and maintain such records 

18 continues for as long as the employer is required to 

19 keep records of the recordable injury or illness; and 

20 (3) such duty does not expire solely because the 

21 employer fails to create the necessary records when 

22 first required to do so. 

23 (b) AUTHORIZATION.—Subsection (a) shall be consid24 ered a specific authorization by Congress in accordance 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1122 IS

1 with section 801(b)(2) of title 5, United States Code, with 

2 respect to the issuance of a new recordkeeping rule. 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSKBCBPHB2PROD with BILLS
No. 49963.

#### Protests 836086-G, etc., of Acorn Importing Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the 'Court dismissed the protests.
**EXHIBIT        32.2 **

**CERTIFICATE        PURSUANT TO**

**18        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

|   | 1. | the                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d), as                  applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | the                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the                  Company                  at the dates and for the period                  indicated. |
|--------|----|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|                                    |                                                      |                                                      |
|-----------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
|                                    |                                                           |
|                               |                                                 |                                                 |
| Dated:                November 21, 2005 | By:                                             | /s/ Steven                R. Blake    |
|                                    | Steven R. BlakeChief                    Financial Officer |
|                                    |                                                      |

----
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Duke Capital LLC (Duke Capital) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David L. Hauser, President of Duke Capital, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Duke Capital.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                      
|--------------------------------------
|/s/    DAVID L. HAUSER                
|David L. Hauser President May 15, 2006
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| **A        REPORT OF THE INTERAGENCY WORKING GROUP ON INDUSTRIAL        ECOLOGY, MATERIAL AND ENERGY FLOWS**                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            | **CONTENTS****Preface****Beginnings****Material Flows in the********20th Century****Solutions**- **Recycle**
- **Remanufacture**
- **Redesign**
- **Rethink**
**Case Studies**- **Industrial                Symbiosis**
- **Design for                Environment**
**The Government’s Role****References****Interagency Working Group on        Industrial Ecology, Material and Energy Flows** |
|                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    |
| Download        a printable report in Portable Document Format (PDF).Adobe Acrobat 3.0(or higher) is required to view and print.        This is freely available for most computer platforms.
This report is best        viewed with a version 3.x (or higher) Internet browser,        screen resolution of 800 x 600 (or higher) at 65,000        colors (or higher).

Most        images are linked to larger, more detailed images. |

----

|                         |                  |      |                  |                         |
|-------------------------|------------------|------|------------------|-------------------------|
| <<        Section | <        Page | Home | Page        > | Section        >> |
<PAGE>
                                                                               .
                                                                               .
                                                                               .

Western Reserve Bancorp, Inc.
Exhibit 11--Earnings per Share

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                          Three months ended March 31,
                                                            2004                 2003
                                                       --------------       -------------
<S>                                                    <C>                  <C>
Numerator:
  Net income                                           $      136,439       $     135,051

Denominator:
  Denominator for basic earnings per
     share--weighted-average shares                           388,052             388,052

  Effect of dilutive securities:
     Nonqualified stock options                                 9,291               9,291

                                                       --------------       -------------
  Denominator for diluted earnings
     per share                                                397,343             397,343
                                                       ==============       =============

Basic earnings per share                               $         0.35       $        0.35
                                                       ==============       =============

Diluted earnings per share                             $         0.34       $        0.34
                                                       ==============       =============
</TABLE>

                                    Page 25
# March 2015

# April 2015

# May 2015

# June 2015

# July 2015

# August 2015

# September 2015

# October 2015

# November 2015

# December 2015

# January 2016

# February 2016

# March 2016

# April 2016

# May 2016

# June 2016

# July 2016

# August 2016

# September 2016

# FY 2017 October 2016

# November 2016
# October 2022

# image1.jpg
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

: CIVIL ACTION NOS.

:

WALKER : 02-3868

SIMON : 02-3887

GOTO : 02-3922

JOHNSON, et al. : 02-3932

HOSOKAWA : 02-3959

KILCY : 02-3964

BYRON : 02-4108

ROCHA, et al. : 02-4121

CAVITT : 02-4139

HIBMA-CANARIO, et al. : 02-4152

BAILEY, et al. : 02-4188

BOSSI, et al. : 02-4234

STEINHAUER, et al. : 02-4257

SKEELS, et al. : 02-4274

WALKER, et al. : 02-4279

FRIEDEN, et al. : 02-4310

DIMANLANTA : 02-4313

:

:

VS. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION, et al. :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of July, 2002, the Court having been previously

advised that the above action cannot proceed to trial and disposition because of the following

reason:

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending disposition of a related

action.

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending determination of

arbitration proceedings.

[ ] - Interlocutory appeal filed.

Case 2:02-cv-04310-RBS Document 2 Filed 07/11/2002 Page 1 of 2
[ X ] - Other: Case is placed into suspense pending receipt of the Case

Transfer Order from the Judicial Panel on Multi District Litigation

transferring case to District of Minnesota..

It is

ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this action closed for statistical purposes and

place the matter in the Civil Suspense File, and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction; and that the case be

restored to the trial docket when the action is in a status so that it may proceed to final

disposition; this order shall not prejudice the rights of the parties to this litigation.

BY THE COURT:

________________________________________

R. Barclay Surrick

Case 2:02-cv-04310-RBS Document 2 Filed 07/11/2002 Page 2 of 2