alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS

NO. WR-86,411-01

EX PARTE BILLY STEVEN NOWDEN, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 24435 HC-1 IN THE 6TH DISTRICT COURT

FROM LAMAR COUNTY

Per curiam. ALCALA, J., filed a concurring opinion.

O R D E R

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of theft and

sentenced to ten years’ imprisonment. The Sixth Court of Appeals affirmed his conviction. Nowden

v. State, No. 06-16-00086-CR (Tex. App.—Texarkana Aug. 26, 2016) (not designated for

publication).

Applicant contends, among other things, that he was incompetent at the guilt and revocation

stages of his case.

Applicant has alleged facts that, if true, might entitle him to relief. Ex parte Patterson, 993
2

S.W.2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these circumstances, additional facts are needed. As

we held in Ex parte Rodriguez, 334 S.W.2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the

appropriate forum for findings of fact. The trial court shall order guilty-plea and revocation counsel

to respond to Applicant’s claim. The trial court may use any means set out in TEX. CODE CRIM.

PROC. art. 11.07, § 3(d). 

If the trial court elects to hold a hearing, it shall determine whether Applicant is indigent. 

If Applicant is indigent and wishes to be represented by counsel, the trial court shall appoint an

attorney to represent him at the hearing. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 26.04. 

The trial court shall make findings of fact and conclusions of law as to whether Applicant’s

pleas were involuntary because he was incompetent at the guilt and revocation stages of his case. 

The trial court shall also make any other findings of fact and conclusions of law that it deems

relevant and appropriate to the disposition of Applicant’s claim for habeas corpus relief.

This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fact issues. The

issues shall be resolved within 90 days of this order. A supplemental transcript containing all

affidavits and interrogatories or the transcription of the court reporter’s notes from any hearing or

deposition, along with the trial court’s supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law, shall

be forwarded to this Court within 120 days of the date of this order. Any extensions of time must be

requested by the trial court and shall be obtained from this Court.

Filed: April 26, 2017

Do not publish
**EXHIBIT 8.1**
LIST OF SUBSIDIARIES OF VIVENDI UNIVERSAL
     Vivendi Universal maintains over 1,000 subsidiaries. Set forth below arethe names of certain of its subsidiaries which carry on a substantial portionof Vivendi Universal’s lines of business. The names of various subsidiaries,including subsidiaries conducting operating activities of Vivendi Universal’svarious businesses domestically and internationally, have been omitted. None ofthe foregoing omitted subsidiaries are considered to be material in relation toVivendi Universal’s balance sheet and operations.     **COUNTRY OF**  **INCORPORATION**CANAL+ GROUP  Groupe Canal+ S.A. FranceCanal+ S.A.(a) FranceCanalSatellite S.A. FranceStudioCanal S.A. FranceMultiThematiques FranceUNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP  Universal Studios HoldingI Corp. USAUniversal Music (UK)Holdings Ltd. UKUniversal EntertainmentGmbH GermanyUniversalMusic K.K. JapanUniversalMusic S.A.S. FranceUniversal Studios,Inc. USAUniversal MusicInvestments Inc. USAPolyGram Holding,Inc. USAInterscope Records USAUMG Recordings, Inc. USAVIVENDI UNIVERSAL GAMES USAVIVENDI UNIVERSALENTERTAINMENT(a)  Universal PicturesInternational B.V. NetherlandsUniversal Studios Inc. USAVivendi UniversalEntertainment LLLP USASFR CEGETEL GROUP  Cegetel Groupe S.A. FranceSFR (mobile and holdingcompany in 2003) FranceCegetel S.A.S./CegetelS.A. (fixed) FranceTelecomDeveloppement FranceMAROC TELECOM S.A. MoroccoOTHER  Vivendi TelecomInternational S.A. FranceVivendi TelecomHungary HungaryKencell S.A. KenyaMonacoTelecom S.A.M. MonacoElektrim TelekomunikacjaS.A. PolandXfera Moviles S.A. SpainVivendi UniversalPublishing S.A. FranceGroupeExpress-Expansion FranceComareg S.A. FranceAtica BrazilVivendi Universal Net USAUGC FranceVeolia EnvironnementS.A. France
 

 

(a) On May 11, 2004, NBC and VUE completed the creation of NBC Universal, aglobal media and entertainment enterprise with expected 2005 revenues of$15 billion. As a result of this transaction, Vivendi Universal has anapproximate 20% interest in NBC Universal which is controlled by GE.Beginning in 2006, Vivendi Universal will have the right to monetize itsinterest over time at fair market value.
II 

Calendar No. 411 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1059 

[Report No. 115–247] 

To extend the authorization of the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control 

Act of 1978 relating to the disposal site in Mesa County, Colorado. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 4, 2017 

Mr. GARDNER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

MAY 10, 2018 

Reported by Ms. MURKOWSKI, without amendment 

A BILL 

To extend the authorization of the Uranium Mill Tailings 

Radiation Control Act of 1978 relating to the disposal 

site in Mesa County, Colorado. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Responsible Disposal 

5 Reauthorization Act of 2017’’. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1059 RS

1 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION. 

2 Section 112(a)(1)(B) of the Uranium Mill Tailings 

3 Radiation Control Act of 1978 (42 U.S.C. 7922(a)(1)(B)) 

4 is amended by striking ‘‘September 30, 2023’’ and insert5 ing ‘‘September 30, 2048’’. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS

lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
Calendar No. 411 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION S. 1059 

[Report No. 115–247] 

A BILL 

To extend the authorization of the Uranium Mill 

to the disposal site in Mesa County, Colorado. Tailings Radiation Control Act of 1978 relating 

MAY 10, 2018 

Reported without amendment 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
Before the Second Division,

May 8, 1962

No. 66744.

#### Bruce W. Eaken *v.*United States,

protest 61/8786 (Cleveland).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Robert K. Herbst*(48 C.C.P.A. 145, C.A.D. 781), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained, and it was held that the personal exemptions should be applied against the value of said automobile to the extent that said exemptions were otherwise uncharged.
yy

IPAC Operational Metrics for October 2015

Volume by Transaction Type
Doliar Amount] % of Total Dollar Amount| Number of Transactions| _% of Total Number of Transactions|
Fiduciary (investment & Borrowing) 4,751,352,441,219 38.54% 7,215 7.30%
[Buy/Sell 65,153,388,197 1.35% 90,012| 91.12%
[Benefits (RITS) 509,027,350] 0.11% 407] 0.415
[Check Aftermath (TRACS) 66,857,027) 0.00% 1143 Li6%|
Zero Dollar | 0.00% | 0} 0.0056)
[Grand Total - October 2015 4,821,981,713,793 100.00%| 98,783 100.00%|
[Grand Total - September 2015 4,345,155,745,304 [348,374
[September to October Change 476,825,968,489| [C9593]
[Percentage Change 11.0% 3.6]
———S=
[Grand Total - October 2014 12,206,569,201,959 [207,937
[Oct 2014 to Oct 2015 Change -7,384,587,488,166| es)
Percentage Change 60.5%} [8S]
--

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

General Refractories Co., 

Plaintiff, 

Civil Action No. 04-CV-3509 

v. 

First State Insurance Co., et al., 

Defendants. 

STIPULATION AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE 

Plaintiff General Refractories Company ("GRC") and defendants AIU Insurance Company, 

Continental Insurance Company (as successor to certain policies of insurance issued by Harbor 

Insurance Company), Government Employees Insurance Company, Lexington Insurance 

Company, Republic Insurance Company (now known as Starr Indemnity Company), and 

Westchester Fire Insurance Company (incorrectly identified as "ACE USA as Successor to 

International Insurance Company") (collectively, the "Settled Carriers")1 having amicably 

resolved their disputes at issue in this action, it is hereby stipulated and agreed: Pursuant to 

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4l(a)(l)(A)(ii), the Settled Carriers are DISMISSED WITH 

PREJUDICE from this action and all claims asserted by any party to this action against a 

Settled Carrier are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Non-settling defendant, Travelers 

Casualty and Surety Company, formerly known as The Aetna Casualty and Surety Co., and 

incorrectly designated in the Complaint as "St. Paul Travelers" may assert a claim for an 

apportioned share set-off under Koppers v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 98 F.3d 1440 (3d Cir. 1996). 

Dated: July 51_, 2014 

13733096v.1 

Case 2:04-cv-03509-LFR Document 617 Filed 07/15/14 Page 1 of 2
OFFIT KURMAN 

"' . 

Michael Conley 

Ten Penn Center 

1801 Market Street 

Suite 2300 

Philadelphia, PA 19103 

Telephone: 267-338-1317 

Facsimile: 267-338-1335 

Counsel for Plaintiff General Refractories 

Company 

SO ORDERED BY THE COURT: 

UNITED 

L.F~JhJl~ STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 

13733096v.1 

WHITE AND WILLIAMS LLP 

OJ _.-;~/ 

;u~ .. l?./ zp - __,., Patricia B. ante e 

Gregory T. LoCasale 

Edward M. Koch 

Michael E. Difebbo, Jr. 

1650 Market Street 

One Liberty Place, Suite 1800 

Philadelphia, PA 19103 

Telephone: 215-864-7000 

Facsimile: 215-864-7123 

{ 

Counsel for defendants AIU Insurance 

Company, Continental Insurance Company (as 

successor-in-interest to certain policies of 

insurance issued by Harbor Insurance 

Company), Government Employees Insurance 

Company, Lexington Insurance Company, 

Republic Insurance Company (now known as 

Starr Indemnity Company), and Westchester 

Fire Insurance Company (incorrectly 

identified as "ACE USA as Successor to 

International Insurance Company") 

- 2 -

Case 2:04-cv-03509-LFR Document 617 Filed 07/15/14 Page 2 of 2
# C_2016200EN.01000701.xml

| 6.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 200/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 200/7

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per le Marche (Italy) lodged on 7 March 2016 — Edra Costruzioni Soc. coop., Edilfac Srl v Comune di Maiolati Spontini

(Case C-140/16)

(2016/C 200/10)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per le Marche

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Edra Costruzioni Soc. coop., Edilfac Srl

Applicants:

Defendant: Comune di Maiolati Spontini

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Do the Community principles of the protection of legitimate expectations and legal certainty, together with the principles of the free movement of goods, the freedom of establishment and the freedom to provide services, laid down in the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), as well as the principles deriving therefrom, such as equality of treatment, non-discrimination, mutual recognition, proportionality and transparency, referred to (most recently) in Directive 2014/24/EU, (1) preclude national legislation, such as the Italian legislation founded on the combined provisions of Articles 87(4) and 86(3a) of Legislative Decree No 163 of 2006 and Article 26(6) of Legislative Decree No 81 of 2008, as interpreted, with a view to securing proper respect for, and uniform application of, the law, pursuant to Article 99 of the Code of Administrative Procedure, by judgments No 3 and No 9 of 2015 of the Plenary Assembly of the Consiglio di Stato, according to which the failure to list the corporate safety and security costs separately in tenders in a procedure for the award of a public works contract inevitably results in the exclusion of the tendering undertaking concerned, even in the case where the obligation to list that information separately was not set out either in the tender rules or on the attached form to be completed for the submission of the tender, and even though, in substantive terms, the tender in question took into account the minimum costs of corporate safety and security?

1

---

(1)  Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC (OJ 2014 L 94, p. 65).

1

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

FRANK and BARBARA RISLEY, :

: CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-CV-4246

Plaintiffs, :

:

v. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION;

BAYER AG;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE;

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM

:

:

:

:

:

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

:

Defendants. :

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of the Court:

Kindly enter the appearances of Hope S. Freiwald, Aline Fairweather, Erin

Brennan and Kirstin J. Miller as attorneys for defendant SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a

GlaxoSmithKline.

Respectfully Submitted,

_____________________________ _____________________________

Hope S. Freiwald Aline Fairweather

_____________________________ _____________________________

Erin Brennan Kirstin J. Miller

DECHERT PRICE & RHOADS

4000 Bell Atlantic Tower

1717 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2793

(215) 994-4000

Case 2:02-cv-04246-AB Document 8 Filed 10/04/2002 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 106 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 106

To repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health 
        Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 entirely.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

             January 12 (legislative day, January 11), 2017

Mr. Cruz (for himself, Mr. Lee, Mr. Rubio, and Mr. Paul) introduced the 
 following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on 
                                Finance

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To repeal the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health 
        Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 entirely.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``ObamaCare Repeal Act''.

SEC. 2. REPEAL OF THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT AND 
              THE HEALTH CARE AND EDUCATION RECONCILIATION ACT OF 2010.

    (a) Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.--Effective on 
January 1, 2018, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Public 
Law 111-148) is repealed and the provisions of law amended or repealed 
by such Act are restored or revived as if such Act had not been 
enacted.
    (b) Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010.--
Effective on January 1, 2018, the Health Care and Education 
Reconciliation Act of 2010 (Public Law 111-152) is repealed and the 
provisions of law amended or repealed by such Act are restored or 
revived as if such Act had not been enacted.

SEC. 3. BUDGETARY EFFECTS OF THIS ACT.

    The budgetary effects of this Act, for the purpose of complying 
with the Statutory Pay-As-You-Go Act of 2010, shall be determined by 
reference to the latest statement titled ``Budgetary Effects of PAYGO 
Legislation'' for this Act, submitted for printing in the Congressional 
Record by the Chairman of the Committee on the Budget of the House of 
Representatives, as long as such statement has been submitted prior to 
the vote on passage of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2016343EN.01002801.xml

| 19.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 343/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 343/28

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Milano (Italy) lodged on 22 June 2016 — Sacko Moussa v Commissione Territoriale per il riconoscimento della Protezione internazionale di Milano

(Case C-348/16)

(2016/C 343/40)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunale di Milano

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Sacko Moussa

Applicant:

Defendant: Commissione Territoriale per il riconoscimento della Protezione internazionale di Milano

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Must Directive 2013/32/EU (1) (in particular Articles 12, 14, 31 and 46) be interpreted as permitting a procedure, such as the Italian procedure (under Article 19(9) of Legislative Decree No 150 of 2011), whereby a judicial authority seised by an asylum-seeker — whose application has been rejected by the administrative authority responsible for considering applications for asylum after it has conducted a full examination, including an interview — may, in cases where the application for judicial review is manifestly unfounded and the administrative authority’s rejection of the application is thus incontrovertible, dismiss the application for judicial review without preparatory inquiries and without being required to afford the applicant a further opportunity to be heard?

1

---

(1)  Directive 2013/32/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection (OJ 2013 L 180, p. 60).

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                           3,057
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   11,742
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (171)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                17,159
<PP&E>                                           3,588
<DEPRECIATION>                                     995
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  22,048
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,585
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            48
<OTHER-SE>                                       8,415
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    22,048
<SALES>                                         14,587
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,587
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    7,740
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,874
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  94
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    879
<INCOME-TAX>                                       334
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                545
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       545
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.11
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.11
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23.2
                                                                    ------------

                       CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-134911, 333-123254, 333-117256, 333-115571) and
Form S-8 (No. 333-106311) of GMX Resources Inc. of our report dated February 16,
2006 (except for Note J, which is dated August 1, 2006), appearing in this Form
10-KSB/A, of GMX Resources Inc.

We also consent to the reference to us under the headingt "Experts" in such
Prospectus.



Smith, Carney & Co., p.c.



Oklahoma City, OK
August 1, 2006
NAVY CASH® 

SOP CHANGE NOTICE

NAVSUP PUB 727

Navy Cash Fleet Support Groups

NAVSUP Fleet Logistics Centers 

Norfolk 

San Diego 

Yokosuka 

Navy Cash SOP Change Notice 2020-003

Subject: BARGE MOVE PROCEDURES

Attention: Supply Officers / Disbursing Officers/ Navy Cash Accountable Officers / Navy Cash Deputies

THIS CHANGE NOTICE HAVE BEEN INCORPORATED INTO 

THE CURRENT NAVY CASH SOP 2.0 DATED MAY 21, 2020.

CANCELLED 5.21.2020
EXHIBIT 23.1
                                                                    ------------

                          INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT


The Board of Directors
GMX Resources Inc.:

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.
333-106311) on Form S-8 of GMX Resources Inc. of our report dated April 6, 2004,
with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of GMX Resources Inc. as of
December 31, 2002 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, changes in shareholders' equity, and cash flows for the years then
ended, which report appears in the December 31, 2003, annual report on Form
10-KSB of GMX Resources Inc.

Our report refers to a changes in the method of accounting for asset retirement
obligations.

                                    KPMG LLP


Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
April 14, 2004
Case 2:04-cv-03359-JPH Document 14 Filed 05/15/06 Page 1 of 27
Case 2:04-cv-03359-JPH Document 14 Filed 05/15/06 Page 2 of 27
Case 2:04-cv-03359-JPH Document 14 Filed 05/15/06 Page 3 of 27
Case 2:04-cv-03359-JPH Document 14 Filed 05/15/06 Page 4 of 27
Case 2:04-cv-03359-JPH Document 14 Filed 05/15/06 Page 5 of 27
Case 2:04-cv-03359-JPH Document 14 Filed 05/15/06 Page 6 of 27
Case 2:04-cv-03359-JPH Document 14 Filed 05/15/06 Page 7 of 27
Case 2:04-cv-03359-JPH Document 14 Filed 05/15/06 Page 8 of 27
Case 2:04-cv-03359-JPH Document 14 Filed 05/15/06 Page 9 of 27
Case 2:04-cv-03359-JPH Document 14 Filed 05/15/06 Page 10 of 27
Case 2:04-cv-03359-JPH Document 14 Filed 05/15/06 Page 11 of 27
Case 2:04-cv-03359-JPH Document 14 Filed 05/15/06 Page 12 of 27
Case 2:04-cv-03359-JPH Document 14 Filed 05/15/06 Page 13 of 27
Case 2:04-cv-03359-JPH Document 14 Filed 05/15/06 Page 14 of 27
Case 2:04-cv-03359-JPH Document 14 Filed 05/15/06 Page 15 of 27
Case 2:04-cv-03359-JPH Document 14 Filed 05/15/06 Page 16 of 27
Case 2:04-cv-03359-JPH Document 14 Filed 05/15/06 Page 17 of 27
Case 2:04-cv-03359-JPH Document 14 Filed 05/15/06 Page 18 of 27
Case 2:04-cv-03359-JPH Document 14 Filed 05/15/06 Page 19 of 27
Case 2:04-cv-03359-JPH Document 14 Filed 05/15/06 Page 20 of 27
Case 2:04-cv-03359-JPH Document 14 Filed 05/15/06 Page 21 of 27
Case 2:04-cv-03359-JPH Document 14 Filed 05/15/06 Page 22 of 27
Case 2:04-cv-03359-JPH Document 14 Filed 05/15/06 Page 23 of 27
Case 2:04-cv-03359-JPH Document 14 Filed 05/15/06 Page 24 of 27
Case 2:04-cv-03359-JPH Document 14 Filed 05/15/06 Page 25 of 27
Case 2:04-cv-03359-JPH Document 14 Filed 05/15/06 Page 26 of 27
Case 2:04-cv-03359-JPH Document 14 Filed 05/15/06 Page 27 of 27