alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1



                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                            W-H ENERGY SERVICES, INC.
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


         In connection with the accompanying report on Form 10-Q for the period
ended March 31, 2003 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kenneth T. White, Jr., the Chief Executive
Officer of W-H Energy Services, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, to my
knowledge, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company in
respect of those items required to be described or presented in such Report
under Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                                                /s/  Kenneth T. White, Jr.
                                                -------------------------------
                                                Name: Kenneth T. White, Jr.
                                                Date:    May 9, 2003


This certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed to be a part of the Report or
"filed" for any purpose whatsoever.
Filed 6/30/16 by Clerk of Supreme Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT

STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

2016 ND 120

Marlin Lee Johnson, Petitioner and Appellant

v.

State of North Dakota, Respondent and Appellee

No. 20160031

Appeal from the District Court of Grand Forks County, Northeast Central Judicial District, the Honorable Lolita G. Hartl Romanick, Judge.

AFFIRMED.

Per Curiam.

Mark T. Blumer, P.O. Box 7340, Fargo, ND 58106, for petitioner and appellant; submitted on brief.

Andrew C. Eyre, Assistant State’s Attorney, Grand Forks County State’s Attorney Office, P.O. Box 5607, Grand Forks, ND 58206, for respondent and appellee; submitted on brief.

Johnson v. State

No. 20160031

Per Curiam.

[¶1]Marlin Johnson appealed a district court order denying his application for post-conviction relief after he was sentenced to thirty months in prison for violating his probation.  Johnson argues the district court erred in its findings and in denying his application because he received ineffective assistance of counsel due to his counsel’s failure to call the victim as a witness, his counsel advised him to plead guilty to violating a no contact order to garner leniency at sentencing for his probation violation, and his counsel did not explain the consequences of a probation violation.  We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).

[¶2]Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.

Dale V. Sandstrom

Carol Ronning Kapsner

Lisa Fair McEvers

Daniel J. Crothers
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

 STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002,

      The undersigned, Amy E. Essex, is the Chief Financial Officer of Alpena
Bancshares, Inc. (the "Company").

      This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the
Company of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
December 31, 2004 (the "Report").

      By execution of this statement, I certify that to the best of my
knowledge:

            A)    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
                  U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and

            B)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
                  covered by the Report.

      This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so
that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that this
statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.

March 30, 2005                                /s/ Amy E. Essex
Dated                                       --------------------------
                                            Amy E. Essex
<TABLE> <S> <C>


        <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                              APR-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                            3719
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    38555
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (9517)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 43734
<PP&E>                                            8455
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (5602)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  124769
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          (37640)
<BONDS>                                       (141684)
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      149598
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  (124769)
<SALES>                                          34136
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 34136
<CGS>                                             5975
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    27899
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (98)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  2857
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                5935
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    400
<INCOME-TAX>                                         7
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                393
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       393
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1089 

To require the Secretary of Energy to review and update a report on the 

energy and environmental benefits of the re-refining of used lubricating oil. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 10, 2017 

Mr. PORTMAN (for himself and Mrs. SHAHEEN) introduced the following bill; 

which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To require the Secretary of Energy to review and update 

a report on the energy and environmental benefits of 

the re-refining of used lubricating oil. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. ENERGY SAVINGS FROM LUBRICATING OIL. 

4 Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment 

5 of this Act, the Secretary of Energy, in cooperation with 

6 the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agen7 cy and the Director of the Office of Management and 

8 Budget, shall— 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1089 IS

1 (1) review and update the report prepared pur2 suant to section 1838 of the Energy Policy Act of 

3 2005 (Public Law 109–58; 119 Stat. 1142); 

4 (2) after consultation with relevant Federal, 

5 State, and local agencies and affected industry and 

6 stakeholder groups, update data that were used in 

7 preparing that report; and 

8 (3) prepare and submit to Congress a coordi9 nated Federal strategy to increase the beneficial 

10 reuse of used lubricating oil that— 

11 (A) is consistent with the national policy 

12 established pursuant to section 2 of the Used 

13 Oil Recycling Act of 1980 (42 U.S.C. 6901a); 

14 and 

15 (B) addresses measures needed— 

16 (i) to increase the responsible collec17 tion of used oil; 

18 (ii) to disseminate public information 

19 concerning sustainable reuse options for 

20 used oil; and 

21 (iii) to promote sustainable reuse of 

22 used oil by Federal agencies, recipients of 

23 Federal grant funds, entities contracting 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1089 IS

1 with the Federal Government, and the gen2 eral public. 

Æ 


lotter on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with BILLS
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1207 

To amend the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 with 

respect to the application of the Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure rule to certain farms, and for other purposes. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 23, 2017 

Mrs. FISCHER (for herself, Mr. RISCH, Mr. BOOZMAN, Mr. WICKER, Mrs. 

ERNST, Mr. MORAN, Mr. SASSE, Mr. HOEVEN, and Mr. ROBERTS) introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works 

A BILL 

To amend the Water Resources Reform and Development 

Act of 2014 with respect to the application of the Spill 

Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure rule to certain 

farms, and for other purposes. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Farmers Undertake 

5 Environmental Land Stewardship Act’’ or the ‘‘FUELS 

6 Act’’. 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1207 IS

1 SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY OF SPILL PREVENTION, CONTROL, 

2 AND COUNTERMEASURE RULE. 

3 Section 1049 of the Water Resources Reform and De4 velopment Act of 2014 (33 U.S.C. 1361 note; 128 Stat. 

5 1257; 130 Stat. 1902) is amended— 

6 (1) in subsection (b)— 

7 (A) in paragraph (1)(B), by striking 

8 ‘‘20,000’’ and inserting ‘‘42,000’’; 

9 (B) in paragraph (2), by striking subpara10 graph (A) and inserting the following: 

11 ‘‘(A) an aggregate aboveground storage ca12 pacity greater than 10,000 gallons but less than 

13 42,000 gallons; and’’; 

14 (C) in paragraph (3)— 

15 (i) by striking subparagraph (A) and 

16 inserting the following: 

17 ‘‘(A) with an aggregate aboveground stor18 age capacity of less than or equal to 10,000 

19 gallons; and’’; and 

20 (ii) in subparagraph (B), by striking 

21 ‘‘; and’’ and inserting a period; and 

22 (D) by striking paragraph (4); 

23 (2) in subsection (c)(2)(A)— 

24 (A) in clause (i), by striking ‘‘1,000’’ and 

25 inserting ‘‘1,320’’; and 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1207 IS

1 (B) in clause (ii), by striking ‘‘2,500’’ and 

2 inserting ‘‘3,000’’; and 

3 (3) by striking subsection (d). 

Æ 


srobinson on DSK5SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
races

IPAC Operational Metrics for June 2017

‘Volume by Transaction Type

Dollar Amount] % of Total Dollar Amount] __ Number of Transactions] __9% of Total Number of Transactions|
Fiduciary (Investment & Borrowing) 9,316 ,159,589,405 99.26% 14,119] 11.80%
Buy/Sell 62,452,125,435 0.57% 103,977] 36.91%
Benefits (RITS) 6,819,528,756| 0.07% 453) 0.38%
[check Aftermath (TRACS) 132,897,029 0.00% 3,092] 0.9155
[zero Dollar | 0.00% ol 0.00%
[Grand Total - june 2017 385,564 140,626] 100.00%| 119,644] 00.00%
[Grand Total - May 2017, 10,671,251,001,738 100.0% 118,454] 100.00%|
[May to June Change “1,285 686,861,112 4,490]
[Percentage Change -12.008%| 7.005%
[Grand Total - June 2016 17,573,585 546,834 111,916]
lune 2016 to June 2017 Change ~8,188,021,406,208 7,725|
[Percentage Change 46.6% 6.9% |
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

BRICKLAYERS AND ALLIED )

CRAFTWORKERS LOCAL 1 OF PA/DE; ) Civil Action

BRICKLAYERS AND ALLIED ) No. 02-CV-04079

CRAFTWORKERS LOCAL 1 OF PA/DE )

HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND; )

BRICKLAYERS AND ALLIED )

CRAFTWORKERS LOCAL 1 OF PA/DE )

JOINT APPRENTICESHIP AND )

TRAINING FUND; )

TILE LAYERS LOCAL 6 ANNUITY FUND;)

TMT TILE FINISHERS LOCAL 32 )

ANNUITY FUND; )

TILE LAYERS LOCAL 6 )

VACATION FUND; and )

TMT TILE FINISHERS LOCAL 32 )

VACATION FUND, )

 )

Plaintiffs )

 )

vs. )

 )

MASTRO MASONRY CONTRACTORS; )

ERNEST BOCK AND SONS, INC.; )

XL SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY; )

and JOSEPH RUSSO, Individually )

and as President of Mastro )

Masonry Contractors, )

 )

Defendants )

ERNEST BOCK AND SONS, INC., )

 )

Cross Claimant )

 )

vs. )

 )

MASTRO MASONRY CONTRACTORS, )

 )

Cross Defendant )

ARGUMENT SCHEDULING ORDER

NOW, this 30th day of September, 2003, 

IT IS ORDERED that oral argument is scheduled before

Judge James Knoll Gardner on Tuesday, May 18, 2004, at 9:30

o’clock a.m. in Courtroom B, Edward N. Cahn United States 

Case 2:02-cv-04079-JKG Document 15 Filed 09/30/2003 Page 1 of 2
1 The memoranda may be forwarded to Judge Gardner by mail at

Edward N. Cahn United States Courthouse, 504 West Hamilton Street, 

Suite 4701, Allentown, Pennsylvania 18101; by fax at (610) 434-3459; or

by e-mail addressed to

Chambers_of_Judge_James_Knoll_Gardner@paed.uscourts.gov

2 Ordinarily each party shall have 20 minutes to present oral

argument unless more time is allotted, or less time is directed, by Judge

Gardner. There will be no rebuttal argument unless Judge Gardner

requests it.

2

Courthouse, 504 West Hamilton Street, Allentown, Pennsylvania, on

all motions for summary judgment, if any, that are timely filed.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that not later than seven days

before the argument date each party shall submit to Judge

Gardner1 a written summary of the issues and of that party’s

argument, which summary shall not exceed two pages in length.2

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that continuances will be granted

only in extraordinary circumstances. Continuance requests shall

be signed by one counsel of record for each represented party and

by each unrepresented party. Continuance requests shall be

submitted at least ten days prior to the argument on a form

approved by Judge Gardner.

By:

 

CHERYL E. SINCLAIR

 Civil Deputy Clerk to

 Judge James Knoll Gardner

 Phone: (610) 434-3457

Case 2:02-cv-04079-JKG Document 15 Filed 09/30/2003 Page 2 of 2
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JUAN MARTINEZ

,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

,

Appellee. §

§

§

§

§ No. 08

- 23

- 00070

- CR

Appeal from the

34th Judicial District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 20230D00029)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was error in the

judgment. We therefore modify the punishment portion of the trial court’s judgment as to Juan

Martinez’s conviction of intoxication a ssault causing serious bodily injury while operating a motor

vehicle (Count III only), such that the judgment imposes a sentence of ten years’ confinement in

TDCJ and no fine, with such term of confinement suspended and he is placed on community

supervisio n for ten years. We otherwise affirm the judgment as modified. This decision shall be

certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 7 TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2023.

G INA M. PALAFOX

, Justice

Before Palafox, J., Soto, J., and Marion, C.J. (Ret.)

Marion, C.J. (Ret.), sitting by assignment
No. 66240.

#### Gloria Gloves, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 299539-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issue is the same in all material respects as that the subject of *United States*v. *Steinberg Bros.*(47 C.C.P.A. 47, C.A.D. 727), and the record showing that the merchandise consists of knit nylon gloves similar in use to silk gloves, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Regulatory Evaluation

Docket No. FAA-2012-0728 Directorate Identifier: 2012-NM-050-AD

If you make changes to the values in the table below, you must ensure the totals update accordingly. If 

they do not, click (or Tab) into and then out of the changed cell.

Estimated Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Do not include oncondition costs here

Costs per Product (e.g., aircraft, engine, 

propeller, appliance)

Work-hours

(include 

access, testing, 

and close-up)

Labor 

cost 

(@$85/h

our)

Parts Cost Total Costs 

(labor + 

parts)

Number of 

U.S. 

Registered

Products

Total Cost 

for U.S. Fleet

Inspection 13.0 $1,105.0

0

$0 $1,105.00 52 $57,460.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.00

The known number of products in compliance: 0

Total Costs of compliance for U.S. fleet: $57,460

Costs covered under warranty (if known) $0

On-Condition Costs:

Action

(e.g., Inspection, 

replacement)

Work-hours

(include access, 

testing, and closeup)

Labor cost 

(@$85/hour)

Parts Cost Cost per Product

Splice Repair 93.0 $7,905.00 $28,126 $36,031.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

$ 0.00 $ 0.00

Special considerations for Economic Analysis (Use this field to explain anything in the Estimated Costs table 

that was assumed or might not be obvious. This field can also be used to explain warranty costs):
Executive Order 12866:

Could the AD be considered a “significant regulatory action”?

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

DOT Regulatory Policies and Procedures:

Is the AD significant? 

YES* NO 

*Explanation: 

Regulatory Flexibility Act:

Will the AD have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities? Explain for 

either a Yes or No answer.

YES NO

Explanation: 

Intrastate Aviation in Alaska:

This AD could affect intrastate aviation in Alaska. Is it appropriate to include specific requirements for 

aircraft operated in Alaska where aviation might be the only mode of transportation?

YES* NO 

*Explanation:
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C.


SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of IRSA
Propiedades Comerciales S.A. (the “Company”) for
the fiscal year ended June 30, 2016 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), Alejandro G. Elsztain, as Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;








(1)
The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15
(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.





IRSA Propiedades Comerciales S.A.October
21,
2016.
By:
/s/ Alejandro
G. ElsztainAlejandro
G. ElsztainChief
Executive Officer





This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except as to the
extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed
by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 212 (Friday, November 3, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75635-75636]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-24301]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION

[Disaster Declaration #20026 and #20027; FLORIDA Disaster Number FL-
20000]


Administrative Declaration of a Disaster for the State of Florida

AGENCY: Small Business Administration.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: This is a notice of an Administrative declaration of a 
disaster for the State of Florida dated 10/30/2023.
    Incident: Tornado.
    Incident Period: 10/12/2023.

DATES: Issued on 10/30/2023.
    Physical Loan Application Deadline Date: 12/29/2023.
    Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date: 07/30/2024.

ADDRESSES: Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business 
Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport 
Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster 
Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd 
Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Notice is hereby given that as a result of 
the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster 
loans may be filed at the address listed above or other locally 
announced locations.
    The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected 
by the disaster:

Primary Counties: Citrus.
Contiguous Counties:
    Florida: Hernando, Levy, Marion, Sumter.

    The Interest Rates are:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                Percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Physical Damage:
  Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere.................      5.000
  Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere..............      2.500
  Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere.................      8.000
  Businesses without Credit Available Elsewhere..............      4.000
  Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere...      2.375
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.375
For Economic Injury:
  Business and Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit      4.000
   Available Elsewhere.......................................
  Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere      2.375
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 20026C 
and for economic injury is 200270.
    The State which received an EIDL Declaration is Florida.


[[Page 75636]]


(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Isabella Guzman,
Administrator.
[FR Doc. 2023-24301 Filed 11-2-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
854098.24.01 10/16/02 3:18 PM

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

LARRY WALLACE and :

PAULINE WALLACE : CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-cv-4186

:

Plaintiffs, :

:

v. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION;

BAYER AG;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE;

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM

:

:

:

:

:

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

:

Defendants. :

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of the Court:

Kindly enter the appearances of Hope S. Freiwald, Aline Fairweather, Erin

Brennan and Kirstin J. Miller as attorneys for defendant SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a

GlaxoSmithKline.

Respectfully Submitted,

_____________________________ _____________________________

Hope S. Freiwald Aline Fairweather

_____________________________ _____________________________

Erin Brennan Kirstin J. Miller

DECHERT PRICE & RHOADS

4000 Bell Atlantic Tower

1717 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2793

(215) 994-4000

Case 2:02-cv-04186-JP Document 11 Filed 10/21/2002 Page 1 of 1
### -82 -80 -78 -76 -74 -72

36 38 40 

## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 09/25 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 25 Sep 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.11 N 77.11 WMeters AGL 

## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■



## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★ ● ● ● ●



## ★ ● ● ● ●