alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016059EN.01003501.xml

| 15.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 59/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 59/35

---

Action brought on 4 December 2015 — BBY Solutions v OHIM — Worldwide Sales Corporation España (BEST BUY GEEK SQUAD)

(Case T-715/15)

(2016/C 059/40)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: BBY Solutions, Inc. (Minneapolis, United States) (represented by: A. Poulter, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Worldwide Sales Corporation España, SL (Sant Vicenç dels Horts, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Applicant of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word elements ‘BEST BUY GEEK SQUAD’ — Community trade mark application No 6 064 001

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before OHIM

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 23 September 2015 in Joined Cases R 517/2015-2 and R 437/2015-2

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision to the extent that it upheld the opposition; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision to the extent that it upheld the opposition;

| — | annul the opposition division’s decision dated 22 December 2014 in Opposition No B 1354630 to the extent that it upheld the opposition; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the opposition division’s decision dated 22 December 2014 in Opposition No B 1354630 to the extent that it upheld the opposition;

| — | accept CTM Application No 6 064 001 for registration; |
| --- | --- |

—

accept CTM Application No 6 064 001 for registration;

| — | order OHIM to bear their own costs and pay those of the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to bear their own costs and pay those of the applicant.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
Document

Exhibit 4.59															
					




DESCRIPTION OF REGISTRANT’S SECURITIES 
REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12 OF THE 
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
A description of the characteristics of the limited liability company membership interest in Burlington Northern Santa Fe, LLC (the “Registrant”) that are registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is set forth in the Registrant’s Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Operating Agreement, filed as an exhibit to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
E-12
Before the Third Division,

May 15, 1957

No. 60751.

#### Gerhard & Hey Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 223148-K (New York).

Johnson, Judge:

The merchandise involved in this case consists of decorated chinaware, imported from France on or about July 2, 1952, and assessed with duty at 45 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 212 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T. D. 51802, and the President’s proclamation of May 4, 1948, T. D. 51909.

This case has been before the court on several occasions and was last restored to the calendar by order dated December 12, 1956. *Gerhard & Hey Co., Inc.*v. *United States,*37 Cust. Ct. 441, Abstract 60419. At that time, we held that, on the record presented, the protest had been filed by a proper party. We also granted a motion to amend the protest, but did not pass upon the merits of the case.

The protest, as amended, states:

The collector has not followed the appraised value in liquidation. The importer entered the merchandise at unit values equivalent to invoice values less 15% discount plus 19.55%. The merchandise was appraised as entered. The collector has taken some other value in liquidation.

At the last hearing, all of the official papers and the entry were received in evidence, and the case was submitted.

According to the official papers, the merchandise was originally entered at a total value of 366,193 French francs, which value was arrived at as follows:

> Total invoice value_ 430, 815 French francs

> Less Remise (Discount) 15%_ 64,622 *“ “*

> Original entered value_ 366, 193 *“ “*

Thereafter, the entry was amended as follows:

> Invoice value_ 366, 193 French francs

> Plus 19.55%_ 71, 591 “

> Amended entered value_ 437, 784 “ “

A red check mark appears on the summary sheet on the back of which is shown the amended entered value, thus indicating that the merchandise was appraised at the value set forth on the amended entry.

However, the collector liquidated the entry on the basis of another value, apparently obtained as follows:

> 430, 815 French francs

> Plus 19.55%_ 84,224.33 “

> 515, 039. 33 “

> Converted to U. S_ $1, 471. 08

Under section 503 (a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, in effect at the time of entry herein, the basis for the assessment of ad valorem duties shall be the entered value or the final appraised value, whichever is higher. Unless the entered value is more than the appraised value (except where a duress certificate has been filed), the collector is bound to liquidate on the basis of the final appraised value. *501*Ciba (Inc.)*v. *United States,*14 Ct. Cust. Appls. 309, T. D. 41913; *Eurasia Import Co., Inc.*v. *United States,*31 C. C. P. A. (Customs) 144, C. A. D. 265.

Since the collector in the instant case based his assessment of duty on a value other than the entered and appraised value, we hold that his liquidation is in error. The protest is sustained, and judgment will be rendered directing the collector to reliquidate the entry, assessing duty on the basis of the appraised value, and to make refund accordingly.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Report of FullCircle Registry, Inc., (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Norman L. Frohreich, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.   /s/ Norman L. Frohreich Norman L. Frohreich, Chief Executive Officer & Principal Accounting Officer April 3, 2009
EXHIBIT 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, John Bellamy,  Chief  Executive  Officer and Principal  Financial  Officer of
Knockout Holdings, Inc. certify that:

      1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Knockout Holdings,
Inc. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005;

      2.  Based on my  knowledge,  this  report  does  not  contain  any  untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

      3. Based on my knowledge,  the financial  statements,  and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

      4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls
and  procedures  (as defined in Exchange Act Rules  13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for
the small business issuer and have:

            (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure  controls and  procedures  to be designed  under my  supervision,  to
ensure that material  information  relating to the small business issuer is made
known to me by others,  particularly  during the period in which this  report is
being prepared;

            (b)  evaluated  the  effectiveness  of the small  business  issuer's
disclosure  controls  and  presented  in this  report my  conclusions  about the
effectiveness  of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the
period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

            (c)  disclosed  in this  report  any  change in the  small  business
issuer's  internal  control over financial  reporting  that occurred  during the
small business  issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's
fourth  fiscal  quarter  in the case of an annual  report)  that has  materially
affected,  or is reasonably  likely to  materially  affect,  the small  business
issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

      5. I have  disclosed,  based on the most  recent  evaluation  of  internal
control over financial  reporting,  to the small business  issuer's auditors and
the audit  committee  of the small  business  issuer's  board of  directors  (or
persons performing the equivalent functions);

            (a) all  significant  deficiencies  and material  weaknesses  in the
design or  operation  of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are
reasonably  likely to adversely  affect the small business  issuer's  ability to
record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

            (b) any fraud, whether or not material,  that involves management or
other  employees  who have a  significant  role in the small  business  issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.


May 18, 2006



 /s/ John Bellamy
--------------------------------------
John Bellamy
Chief Executive Officer and
Principal Financial Officer
No. 52521.

protests 8657-K, etc. (New York).

#### James E. Markham, Alien Property Custodian *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANESOXLEY

ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Galaxy Next Generation, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10K pursuant for the year ended June 30, 2019, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Gary LeCroy, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date: September 30, 2019



/s/ Gary LeCroy



Gary LeCroy

Chief Executive Officer, President and Director
January 2017 to January 2018 Schedule

For Treasury-Disbursed Recurring Benefit Payments

Settlement Dates

Agency Jan’17 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan’18

OPM Office of Personnel Management

Civil Service Retirement/Annuity

1/2** 2/1 3/1 4/3** 5/1 6/1 7/3** 8/1 9/1 10/2** 11/1 12/1 1/2**

RRB Railroad Retirement Board 

Railroad Retirement/Annuity

1/2** 2/1 3/1 4/3** 5/1 6/1 7/3** 8/1 9/1 10/2** 11/1 12/1 1/2**

VA Department of Veterans Affairs 

Compensation and Pension

12/30* 2/1 3/1 3/31* 5/1 6/1 6/30* 8/1 9/1 9/29* 11/1 12/1 12/29*

SSA Social Security Administration 

3rd of Month

1/3 2/3 3/3 4/3 5/3 6/2* 7/3 8/3 9/1* 10/3 11/3 12/1* 1/3

SSA 

Cycle -2 2nd Wednesday

1/11 2/8 3/8 4/12 5/10 6/14 7/12 8/9 9/13 10/11 11/8 12/13 1/10

SSA

Cycle -3 3rd Wednesday

1/18 2/15 3/15 4/19 5/17 6/21 7/19 8/16 9/20 10/18 11/15 12/20 1/17

SSA

Cycle -4 4th Wednesday

1/25 2/22 3/22 4/26 5/24 6/28 7/26 8/23 9/27 10/25 11/22 12/27 1/24

SSI 

Supplemental Security Income

12/30* 2/1 3/1 3/31* 5/1 6/1 6/30* 8/1 9/1 9/29* 11/1 12/1 12/29*

DOL-Black Lung

(Legacy Payments)

1/3 2/3 3/3 4/3 5/3 6/2* 7/3 8/3 9/1* 10/3 11/3 12/1* 1/3

DOL – Black Lung

(New Enrollees)

1/13* 2/15 3/15 4/14* 5/15 6/15 7/14* 8/15 9/15 10/13* 11/15 12/15 1/12*

.

* = Settlement Date Adjusted to the Preceding Business Day

** = Settlement Date Adjusted to the Following Business Day

Prepared by the U. S. Department of the Treasury/Bureau of the Fiscal Service January 2017
# C_2018022EN.01001101.xml

| 22.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/11

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 23 November 2017 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Helsingin hallinto-oikeus) — Proceedings brought by A Oy

(Case C-292/16) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Freedom of establishment - Direct taxation - Corporation tax - Directive 90/434/EEC - Article 10(2) - Transfer of assets - Non-resident permanent establishment transferred, in the course of a transfer of assets, to a receiving company also non-resident - Right of the Member State of the transferring company to tax that establishment’s profits or capital gains resulting from the transfer of assets - National legislation providing for immediate taxation of the profits or capital gains in the year of transfer - Collection of the tax due as revenue of the tax year in which the transfer of assets took place))

(2018/C 022/13)

Language of the case: Finnish

Referring court

Referring court

Helsingin hallinto-oikeus

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

A Oy

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 49 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which, where a resident company, in the course of a transfer of assets, transfers a non-resident permanent establishment to a company that is also non-resident, first, provides for the immediate taxation of the capital gains resulting from the transfer and, second, does not allow deferred collection of the tax, whereas in an equivalent national situation such capital gains are not taxed until the disposal of the transferred assets, in so far as that legislation does not allow the deferred collection of the tax.

---

(1)  OJ C 270, 25.7.2016.

1

---
EXHIBIT 23





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM











EXHIBIT 23 –





Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm





We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference into the Registration Statement on Form S-8 for the Company's 1996 Stock Option Plan and 1996 Recognition and Retention Plan (Registration No. 333-83198) of our report dated March 25, 2011 relating to the consolidated financial statements of First Federal of Northern Michigan Bancorp, Inc. as of December 31, 2010 which appear in this Form 10-K of First Federal of Northern Michigan Bancorp, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2010.





/s/ Plante & Moran, PLLC





Auburn Hills, Michigan


March 25, 2011
(‘fl’]:ifisiICEI_ISAMAI/.CARDI.NWI<I(,iIl—(1.1(KLIEIIII.UDUI(I(211)712-3150Jsiiui.s:]_LIiccIcrkQi5Ihtnt,rIsgovDAVIDL.IlkIILlS/MDIIYFRANCIS-GAYIFIDoINii.ASS.lANE—1311515155AI)MINISIIIAIIlI<LiIZAIIDIlILANE—MilkS(214)712—3434RDiIi.REM.1:11IMDIII—gayIc_huIIIpWäMIIINcourtsDvLANAMYERSQEourtofTppeaIIL:ffiftljThtrictofcxantaIIa(24)745-083ADAIIROWN600CDNIMII1CESIIUii,SuIiE200(RAIL;SIDIMARI—lsI-RN’.1noiWillIlIII.DAIIAS,1ExASTh202WWW.IXCDIII<IS(IIIV/5IIIEDA.ASPXDAVIDJSOIENEK(214)712-3401)February25,2015ZachanahWilliamsTDCJNo.1883415MiddletonUnit13055FM3522Abilene,Tx.79601RE:CourtofAppealsNumber:05-13-01479-CRTrialCourtCaseNumber:F-1353277-JStyle:ZachariahArthurWIlliamsV.TheStateofTexasI.Thecasehasbeensubmittedandispendingconsideration.2.TheCourtofCriminalAppealshasjurisdictionoverpost—convictionwritsandhabeascorpus.PleasecontacttheCourtofCriminalAppealsforanyformsorinformation.3.TheCourthasnorecordofanappealonfileintheabovereferencednameortrialcourtnumber.4.Enclosedisacopyof’theopinioninyourappeal.5.ThisCourtdoesnotappointcounsel6.Neitherthejudgesnorthestafl’ofthisCourtcangivelegaladvice.Therefore,youmaywishtocontactyourattorney;thetrialcourt;ortheStateCounselforOffenders,TexasDepartmentofCriminalJustice,P.O.Box4005,l-luntsville,TX,77342forfurtherinformationorassistance.7.TheCourtdoesnothavejurisdictiontocompelthetrialcourttoprovideyouwithfreecopiesofanyofyourtrialcourtrecords.ThisCourtdoesnotprovidefreecopiesofanydocumentswithoutprepaymentofcosts.OurchargeisS.10perpagepayableinadvancebycashier’scheckormoneyorder.8.Yourcasehasbeensetforsubmissionon9.Ourrecordsreflectthatthe(yourcaseissetbrsubmission3/25/2015onthebriefsthatwerefiled10.Enclosedpleasefindthecopiesyourequested.II-ThecostforthecopiesyourequestedisRespectfully,/5/LisaMatz,ClerkoftheCourt7
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:  August 9, 2007
    By:
    /s/ C. S. LiollioC. S. LiollioPresident and Chief Executive Officer 
 30
# 2016_09 Pivot Table 5B

# 2016_09 MTS Table 5

&F	

&P/&N
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 90 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that gun violence 

is a public health issue and Congress should enact by the end of the 

115th Congress comprehensive Federal legislation that protects the Second Amendment and keeps communities safe and healthy, including 

expanding enforceable background checks for all commercial gun sales, 

improving the mental health system in the United States, and making 

gun trafficking and straw purchasing a Federal crime. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 3, 2017 

Mr. LOWENTHAL (for himself, Mr. CICILLINE, Mr. COHEN, Mr. CONYERS, Mr. 

GRIJALVA, Mr. HASTINGS, Mr. KEATING, Mr. LYNCH, Mrs. CAROLYN B. 

MALONEY of New York, Mr. MEEKS, Ms. MOORE, Ms. NORTON, Mr. 

POCAN, Miss RICE of New York, Mr. SWALWELL of California, Mr. 

TONKO, Ms. TSONGAS, Mr. YARMUTH, Mr. MCGOVERN, Mr. BLUMENAUER, Mr. ELLISON, Ms. ESHOO, Mr. DESAULNIER, Mr. MCNERNEY, and Mr. CA ́RDENAS) submitted the following resolution; which was 

referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions 

as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

gun violence is a public health issue and Congress should 

enact by the end of the 115th Congress comprehensive 

Federal legislation that protects the Second Amendment 

and keeps communities safe and healthy, including expanding enforceable background checks for all commercial gun sales, improving the mental health system in 

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS

2 

•HRES 90 IH 

the United States, and making gun trafficking and straw 

purchasing a Federal crime. 

1 Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Rep2 resentatives that— 

3 (1) gun violence is a public health issue; and 

4 (2) Congress should enact by the end of the 

5 115th Congress comprehensive Federal legislation 

6 that protects the Second Amendment and keeps 

7 communities safe and healthy, including expanding 

8 enforceable background checks for all commercial 

9 gun sales, improving the mental health system in the 

10 United States, and making gun trafficking and 

11 straw purchasing a Federal crime. 

Æ 

mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MICHELE RICCI : CIVIL ACTION

:

:

v. : No. 02-4330

:

:

AETNA, INC. d/b/a AETNA U.S. :

HEALTHCARE and AETNA LIFE :

INSURANCE COMPANY :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 28th day of July, 2005, it is ORDERED that the oral argument on

the cross-motions for summary judgment currently scheduled for August 11, 2005, at 2:00

p.m. is rescheduled for August 16, 2005, at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom 15B.

 /s/ 

TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE, J.

Case 2:02-cv-04330-TJS Document 47 Filed 07/28/2005 Page 1 of 1
# Map            Military geography of former Yugoslavia.
No. 48424.

#### Protests 774287-G, etc., of Samuel Aitken et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.,

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

CERTA PROPAINTERS, LTD : CIVIL ACTION

:

vs. :

:

RALPH E. ROSSI, ET AL. : NO. 2:04-CV-04950-LDD

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 6TH day of MAY, 2005, it having been reported that the issues

between the parties in this matter have been settled, and pursuant to the provisions of Rule

41.1(b) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure, it is hereby ORDERED that this matter is

DISMISSED with prejudice. It is further ORDERED that all pending motions are DENIED as

moot. The Clerk of Court is directed to statistically close this matter.

MICHAEL E. KUNZ, Clerk of Court

BY: /s/ 

Carol Sampson

 Deputy Clerk

E-Mailed - 5/6/05

F. J. Dunn 

J. A. Zucker

L. Fisher

L. A. Ward

M. DeMarco

Case 2:04-cv-04950-LDD Document 20 Filed 05/06/05 Page 1 of 1
No. 57936.

protests 196405-K, etc. (New York).

#### Cresca Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of grenadine the same in all material respects as that the subject of *La Manna, Azema & Farnan, Inc.*v. *United States*(39 C. C. P. A. 44, C. A. D. 461), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the EnergySouth, Inc. (the Company) Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Charles P.
Huffman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company. Date: August 3, 2004
    
    By:

    /s/ Charles P. HuffmanCharles P. HuffmanSenior Vice President andChief Financial Officer