alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2015381EN.01004801.xml

| 16.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 381/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 381/48

---

Action brought on 7 September 2015 — Diesel v OHIM — Sprinter megacentros del deporte (curved and angled line)

(Case T-521/15)

(2015/C 381/58)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Diesel SpA (Breganze, Italy) (represented by: A. Gaul, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Sprinter megacentros del deporte, SL (Elche, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Applicant: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant:

Trade mark at issue: Figurative mark (Representation of a curved or angled line) — Application for registration No 11 404 019

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before OHIM:

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 18 June 2015 in Case R 3291/2014-2

Contested decision:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) Regulation No 207/2009.

---
Exhibit 99.2
                        CERTIFICATION OF CFO PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Sunshine PCS Corporation
(the  "Company")  for the year  ended  December  31,  2002,  as  filed  with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  Robert E.
Dolan, as Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies,  pursuant to
18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of his knowledge:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                     /s/ Robert E. Dolan
                                     -------------------
                                     Name: Robert E. Dolan
                                     Title: Chief Financial Officer

Date: March 31, 2003



This   certification   accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  ss.  906  of  the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent required by the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of ss.18
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.1

                          WESTERN RESERVE BANCORP, INC.
                                   FORM 10-QSB
                        QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2004

                       CERTIFICATION OF FINANCIAL RESULTS

I, Edward J. McKeon, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Western
Reserve Bancorp, Inc., hereby certify the following:

      -     This Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of Sections
            13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

      -     The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial position and results of operations
            of Western Reserve Bancorp, Inc. as of and for the periods
            presented.

Date: November 12, 2004                     /s/ Edward J. McKeon
                                            Edward J. McKeon
                                            President and Chief Executive
                                            Officer

                                    Page 35
```

[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 40 (Tuesday, March 1, 2016)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Page 10508]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-04435]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 75

Continuous Emission Monitoring

CFR Correction

    In Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations, Parts 72 to 80, 
revised as of July 1, 2015, on page 223, in Sec.  75.16, paragraphs 
(b)(1)(ii)(A) and (b)(1)(ii)(B) are removed.
[FR Doc. 2016-04435 Filed 2-29-16; 8:45 am]
 BILLING CODE 1505-01-D
```
# C_2016326EN.01000902.xml

| 5.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/9

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Noord-Nederland, sitting in Groningen (Netherlands), lodged on 27 May 2016 — Bas Jacob Adriaan Krijgsman v Surinaamse Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV

(Case C-302/16)

(2016/C 326/18)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Rechtbank Noord-Nederland, sitting in Groningen

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Bas Jacob Adriaan Krijgsman

Applicant:

Defendant: Surinaamse Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

What (procedural and substantive) requirements must be imposed on the performance of the obligation to inform referred to in Article 5(1)(c) of Regulation No 261/2004 (1) in the case where the contract for carriage has been entered into via a travel agent or the booking has been made via a website?

1

---

(1)  Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91 (OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1).

1

---
**Exhibit
      32.1**




Certification
      Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002




In
      connection with the Quarterly Report of GSV, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q
      for the period ending March 31, 2008 (the "Report"), I, Gilad Gat, Chief
      Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
      to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirement of Section 13(a) or 15 (d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the Company's financial position and results of operations.





By:
            /s/
                Gilad GatGilad
                GatChief
                Executive OfficerChief
                Financial OfficerMay
                14, 2008
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Dmitry Beinus, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Shoe Pavilion, Inc. for the period ended October 2, 2004; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us by others within that entity, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of October 2, 2004, based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 15, 2004
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350As Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

 

In connectionwith the Annual Report of Badger State Ethanol, LLC (the “Company”) on Form10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof, (the “Report”), I, John L. Malchine,Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, asadopted pursuant to 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1.                                       TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

February 24, 2005

 
|   | /s/ John L. Malchine    |
|--------|-------------------------|
|   | John L. Malchine        |
|   | Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CRIMINAL NO.

V. :

WILLIAM JONES : 04-464

AMENDED ORDER SETTING CONDITIONS OF RELEASE

AND NOW, this day of November, 2004, the following conditions of

release are set:

1 . Defendant will not be required to submit to electronic monitoring; and

2. Defendant shall abide by all other conditions of release as stated in this court's

October 7, 2004 order.

BY THE COURT:

 

CAROL SANDRA MOORE WELLS

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:04-cr-00464-LDD Document 18 Filed 11/17/04 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:04-cv-05510-JS   Document 76   Filed 01/29/07   Page 1 of 6

Case 2:04-cv-05510-JS   Document 76   Filed 01/29/07   Page 2 of 6

Case 2:04-cv-05510-JS   Document 76   Filed 01/29/07   Page 3 of 6

Case 2:04-cv-05510-JS   Document 76   Filed 01/29/07   Page 4 of 6

Case 2:04-cv-05510-JS   Document 76   Filed 01/29/07   Page 5 of 6

Case 2:04-cv-05510-JS   Document 76   Filed 01/29/07   Page 6 of 6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

: CIVIL ACTION NOS.

:

TAYLOR : 02-3877

JACKSON : 02-3879

LIAGA, et al. : 02-3920

KARGE, et al. : 02-3927

GREEN, et al. : 02-3942

MARKS : 02-3969

FULTZ : 02-3977

RACKLEY : 02-4118

THOMPSON, et al. : 02-4125

RUSSELL, et al. : 02-4127

ALCALA : 02-4131

ANDERSON : 02-4193

CAGAPE, et al. : 02-4227

MONZON, et al. : 02-4241

SANDOVAL, et al. : 02-4282

CHAPMAN, et al. : 02-4289

DUNHAM, et al. : 02-4304

FORTUNATO, et al. : 02-4315

:

VS. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION, et al. :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of July, 2002, the Court having been previously

advised that the above action cannot proceed to trial and disposition because of the following

reason:

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending disposition of a related

action.

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending determination of

arbitration proceedings.

[ ] - Interlocutory appeal filed.

[ X ] - Other: Case is placed into suspense pending receipt of the Case

Transfer Order from the Judicial Panel on Multi District Litigation

transferring case to District of Minnesota.

Case 2:02-cv-04315-JCJ Document 2 Filed 07/10/2002 Page 1 of 2
It is

ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this action closed for statistical purposes and

place the matter in the Civil Suspense File, and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction; and that the case be

restored to the trial docket when the action is in a status so that it may proceed to final

disposition; this order shall not prejudice the rights of the parties to this litigation.

BY THE COURT:

________________________________________

J. Curtis Joyner, Judge

Case 2:02-cv-04315-JCJ Document 2 Filed 07/10/2002 Page 2 of 2
Before the Third Division,

August 25, 1948

No. 52522.

protests 969803-G, etc. (San Francisco).

#### Matson Navigation Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that certain items contained in compilation sheets, received in evidence as collective exhibit 1, were entered as ships’ stores upon vessels of'the plaintiff company. Following the case of *Matson Navigation Co.*v. *United States*(5 Cust. Ct. 98, C. D. 377), it was held that the bottles in question are entitled to exemption from duty as ships’ supplies. The protests were sustained to this extent.
# C_2017168EN.01001502.xml

| 29.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 168/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 168/15

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 22 March 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht München, Landgericht München I — Germany) — Criminal proceedings against Ianos Tranca (C-124/16), Tanja Reiter (C-213/16) and Ionel Opria (C-188/16)

(Joined Cases C-124/16, C-188/16 and C-213/16) (1)

1

((References for a preliminary ruling - Judicial cooperation in criminal matters - Directive 2012/13/EU - Right to information in criminal proceedings - Right to be informed about the charge - Service of a penalty order - Procedures - Mandatory appointment of person authorised to accept service - Non-resident accused person with no fixed place of residence - Period for lodging an objection running from service on the person authorised to accept service))

(2017/C 168/19)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Amtsgericht München, Landgericht München I

Parties in the main proceedings

Parties in the main proceedings

Ianos Tranca (C-124/16), Tanja Reiter (C-213/16) and Ionel Opria (C-188/16)

intervening party: Staatsanwaltschaft München I

intervening party:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 2, Article 3(1)(c), and Article 6(1) and (3) of Directive 2012/13/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2012 on the right to information in criminal proceedings must be interpreted to the effect that they do not preclude legislation of a Member State, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which, in criminal proceedings, provides that the accused person who neither resides in that Member State nor has a fixed place of residence in that State or in his Member State of origin is required to appoint an agent for the purposes of service of a penalty order concerning him and that the period for lodging an objection to that order, before it becomes enforceable, runs from service of that order on that agent.

Article 6 of Directive 2012/13, however, requires that when the penalty order is enforced, as soon as the person concerned has actually become aware of the order, he should be placed in the same situation as if that order had been served on him personally and, in particular, that he have the whole of the prescribed period for lodging an objection, where necessary, benefiting from having his position restored to the status quo ante.

It is for the referring court to ensure that the national procedure for the accused person’s position being restored to the status quo ante and the conditions to which the exercise of that procedure is subject are applied in a manner consistent with those requirements and that that procedure thus permits the effective exercise of the rights provided for in Article 6.

---

(1)  OJ C 260, 18.7.2016.

1

---
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1059 

To extend the authorization of the Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control 

Act of 1978 relating to the disposal site in Mesa County, Colorado. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 4, 2017 

Mr. GARDNER introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To extend the authorization of the Uranium Mill Tailings 

Radiation Control Act of 1978 relating to the disposal 

site in Mesa County, Colorado. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Responsible Disposal 

5 Reauthorization Act of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. AUTHORIZATION. 

7 Section 112(a)(1)(B) of the Uranium Mill Tailings 

8 Radiation Control Act of 1978 (42 U.S.C. 7922(a)(1)(B)) 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1059 IS

1 is amended by striking ‘‘September 30, 2023’’ and insert2 ing ‘‘September 30, 2048’’. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
# C_2016343EN.01002301.xml

| 19.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 343/23 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 343/23

---

Appeal brought on 20 May 2016 by Zoohaus Bürstadt, Helmut Ofenloch GmbH & Co. KG against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 17 March 2016 in Case T-817/14, Zoofachhandel Züpke GmbH and Others v European Commission

(Case C-311/16 P)

(2016/C 343/35)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Appellants: Zoohaus Bürstadt, Helmut Ofenloch GmbH & Co. KG (represented by: E. Hauk, lawyer)

Appellants:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Other party to the proceedings:

This case was removed from the register of the Court by order of the Court of 20 July 2016.

---
Exhibit 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PRSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARABANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly report of Rosedale  Decorative  Products,  Ltd.
(the "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2003 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),
I, Norman  Maxwell,  Chief  Financial  Officer,  Secretary  and Treasurer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

(3)  The Report fully complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

(4)  The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Norman Maxwell
------------------
    Norman Maxwell
    Chief Financial Officer,
    Secretary and Treasurer

December 10, 2003
# ECOTONE

----

- **Volume        3, Number 4** **—       Winter 1999/2000** **Volume       3, Number 3**
**—        Summer/Fall/99**
**Volume       3, Number 2**
**—        Spring 1999**
**Volume        3, Number 1**
**—        Winter 1998/99**
**Volume 2, Number 8****— Fall 1998**
**Volume        2, Number 7****— August 1998**
**Volume        2, Number 6****— July 1998**
**Volume        2, Number 5****— May 1998**

***Ecotone*** is brought to you by the HeadquartersAir Force Materiel Command Office of Public Affairs,Environmental News Division.

The ***Ecotone*** serves a dual purpose:
- As an electronic magazine,  *Ecotone*         informs readers about environmental issues affecting AFMC        installations, as well as the entire Air Force.
- As a news service,  *Ecotone*  provides stories        for reprint -- please give credit to the author(s) named        or the  *Ecotone*  -- unless otherwise stated.        Please adhere to these requirements, as further        publication rights must be negotiated with publication of        origin.

AFMC has an aggressive environmental program separated into **fourpillars**, as follows:

**Restoration:** The focus of the *restoration pillar*is to clean up pollution resulting from past activities andrestore sites to safe conditions.

**Compliance:**The *compliance pillar*represents aprogram that assures present AFMC operations comply with allfederal, state, local, Department of Defense (DoD) and U.S. AirForce environmental standards.

**Conservation:** The *conservation pillar* focuses onthe incorporation of environmental considerations into soundplanning practices. The goal is to protect and enhance ournatural and cultural resources, including wetlands, historicsites and endangered species, through sound stewardship,management and the use of the environmental impact analysisprocess.

**Pollution Prevention:** The *pollution preventionpillar* focuses on issues within all areas of AFMC operationsand the acquisition process. The goal is to prevent futurepollution by reducing the use of hazardous materials at thesource and preventing environmental release of potentialpollutants.

 

*Editor's Note: Comments, questions, or requests about thisproduct and story ideas are welcome. Send them to: Larry Glidewell,Senior Environmental PA, HQ AFMC/PAX, 4375 Chidlaw Rd, Ste 6, Wright-PattersonAFB, OH 45433-5006, call commercial 937-257-7604 or DSN Voice787-7604, commercial fax 937-257-2558 or DSN 787-2558, or e-mailto**larry.glidewell@wpafb.af.mil.*

**Visit the Air Force Link Environmental Page at**http://www.af.mil/environment

**Additional AFMC Environmental Links**AFMC CivilEngineering Environmental DivisionASCEnvironmental NewsHSCEnvironmental ManagementKellyAFB Environmental NewsSM-ALCEnvironmental Management
Comments orquestions?
AFMC Home Page