alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

October 22, 2012

d1015

Order 

October 22, 2012

145527

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 145527

COA: 310064

Berrien CC: 2011-003415-FC

DEANDRAE LEVINCE MILLER,

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the June 18, 2012 order 

of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded 

that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-2194

E. YVETTE BARNES,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

PAUL H. HULSEY, Esq.,

Defendant & Third Party Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

RICHARD HAYHURST,

Third Party Defendant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. Patrick Michael Duffy, District

Judge. (CA-96-2939-23-2)

Submitted: January 21, 1999 Decided: February 3, 1999

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

E. Yvette Barnes, Appellant Pro Se. Susan Pedrick McWilliams,

NEXSEN, PRUET, JACOBS & POLLARD, Columbia, South Carolina; James

Edward Holler, HOLLER, DENNIS, CORBETT, GARNER & ORMOND, Columbia,

South Carolina, for Appellee.
* In her informal brief, Barnes explicitly has abandoned on

appeal her claims of fraud and intentional infliction of emotional

distress.

2

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

E. Yvette Barnes appeals the district court’s order granting

summary judgment to Paul H. Hulsey in her diversity action in which

she raised claims of legal malpractice, fraud, and intentional

infliction of emotional distress. We have reviewed the record and

the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error.* Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

Barnes v. Hulsey, No. CA-96-2939-23-2 (D.S.C. July 10, 1998). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 58457.

protests 132180-K and 116934-K (San Francisco).

#### Hulse Import Co. and West Coast Distributors, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), and *United States*v. *The Josebra Company*(41 C. C. P. A. 206, C. A. D. 552), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
# MTS Cover

# Introduction

# Table 1

# Table 2

# Figure 1

# Figure 2

# Figure 3

# Figure 4

# Table 3

# Table 4

# Table 5

# Table 6

# Table 6A

# Table 6B

# Table 6C

# Table 6D

# Table 6E

# Table 7

# Table 8

# Table 9

# Explanatory Notes

# MTS Scheduled Release
```

[Federal Register: July 6, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 128)]
[Notices]               
[Page 38791]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr06jy10-48]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

CONSUMER PRODUCT SAFETY COMMISSION

 
Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: Wednesday, July 7, 2010; 2 p.m.-3 p.m.

PLACE: Hearing Room 420, Bethesda Towers, 4330 East West Highway, 
Bethesda, Maryland.

STATUS: Closed to the Public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Compliance Status Report

    The Commission staff will brief the Commission on the status of 
compliance matters.
    For a recorded message containing the latest agenda information, 
call (301) 504-7948.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Todd A. Stevenson, Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, 4330 East West 
Highway, Bethesda, MD 20814, (301) 504-7923.

    Dated: June 29, 2010.
Todd A. Stevenson,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2010-16499 Filed 7-1-10; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE 6355-01-P
```
# C_2018427EN.01003902.xml

| 26.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 427/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 427/39

---

Judgment of the General Court of 26 September 2018 — Puma v EUIPO — Doosan Machine Tools (PUMA)

(Case T-62/16) (1)

(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark PUMA - Earlier international figurative trade marks PUMA - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))

(2018/C 427/48)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Puma SE (Herzogenaurach, Germany) (represented by: P. González-Bueno Catalán de Ocón, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Folliard-Monguiral and D. Walicka, acting as Agents)

Other party: Doosan Machine Tools Co. Ltd (Seongsan-gu, South Korea) authorised to replace the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO (represented by: R. Böhm and S. Overhage, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 4 December 2015 (Case R 1052/2015-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Puma and Doosan Infracore Co. Ltd.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 4 December 2015 (Case R 1052/2015-4); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Annuls the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 4 December 2015 (Case R 1052/2015-4);

| 2. | Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Puma SE; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Puma SE;

| 3. | Orders Doosan Machine Tools Co. Ltd to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Doosan Machine Tools Co. Ltd to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 118, 4.4.2016.

---
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1149 Reported in Senate (RS)]

<DOC>

                                                       Calendar No. 679
115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
                                S. 1149

                          [Report No. 115-393]

To amend the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act to repeal a provision 
limiting the export of timber harvested from land conveyed to the Kake 
                   Tribal Corporation under that Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 17, 2017

 Ms. Murkowski introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
       referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources

                           November 28, 2018

              Reported by Ms. Murkowski, without amendment

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
To amend the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act to repeal a provision 
limiting the export of timber harvested from land conveyed to the Kake 
                   Tribal Corporation under that Act.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. REPEAL OF PROVISION LIMITING THE EXPORT OF TIMBER HARVESTED 
              FROM CERTAIN KAKE TRIBAL CORPORATION LAND.

    Section 42 of the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act (43 U.S.C. 
1629h) is amended--
            (1) by striking subsection (h);
            (2) by redesignating subsection (i) as subsection (h); and
            (3) in subsection (h) (as so redesignated), in the first 
        sentence, by striking ``and to provide'' and all that follows 
        through ``subsection (h)''.
                                                       Calendar No. 679

115th CONGRESS

  2d Session

                                S. 1149

                          [Report No. 115-393]

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

To amend the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act to repeal a provision 
limiting the export of timber harvested from land conveyed to the Kake 
                   Tribal Corporation under that Act.

_______________________________________________________________________

                           November 28, 2018

                       Reported without amendment
```
# :SP~A
-J..() 1/
- 0035 Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed? , Organization Person Contacted Date Response i\':lliollll! Business Aircraft Association [Ii Cotli 412712010 

### - Rl'gional Airline As.. •• ociatioll Dave Lottercr 4/27/2010 Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 4/27/2010 

### - A"fA ;\,] Lopez I 4/27/2010 

# (Jf- x 

# Ii?,~k V.,.n"" 

# '>MIO 

# - )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

SUZANNE MILLER : CIVIL ACTION

 Plaintiff :

:

v. :

: NO. 04-cv-4777

ROBERT FORNEY, et al. :

Defendants. :

SETTLEMENT MEMORANDUM

1. This matter shall be dismissed with prejudice in accordance with Local Rule 41.b.

2. Plaintiff shall execute a general release within 30 days of this Settlement

Memorandum

3. Defendant, Lehigh County Housing Authority, shall pay the gross amount of

$55,000 made out to Plaintiff, Suzanne Miller, and Don Bailey, her attorney, within

5 business days of the execution of the release. This amount is paid in full settlement

(including counsel fees and costs) of Plaintiffs' claims against Lehigh County

Housing Authority.

4. This settlement is made on behalf of Lehigh County Housing Authority only, and not

the other Defendants. Pursuant to this Settlement Memorandum, Plaintiff withdraws

with prejudice all claims against the other Defendants: Robert Forney, Ron Unger,

John Seitz, Dan Beers, Kent Herman, and Valley Housing DevelopmentCorporation.

5. Plaintiff agrees to indemnify Lehigh County Housing Authority for any tax penalties

associated with this settlement agreement. 

Case 2:04-cv-04777-PD Document 41 Filed 09/29/05 Page 1 of 2
6. Plaintiff, Suzanne Miller, agrees not to reapply for any job with Lehigh County

Housing Authority.

7. The Parties agree that Judge Paul S. Diamond will serve as the final arbiter of all

disputes relating to this Memorandum of Understanding.

_____________________ ____________________

Don Bailey Joseph Goldberg

Bailey, Stretton & Ostrowski W eber Gallagher Simpso n

Stapleton Fires & Newby LLP

On Behalf of Plaintiff On Behalf of Defendant

Dated: September 28, 2005

This Settlement Memorandum is ENTERED as an ORDER of this Court, on this 28th Day of

September, 2005.

BY THE COURT:

_________________________

Paul S. Diamond, J.

Case 2:04-cv-04777-PD Document 41 Filed 09/29/05 Page 2 of 2
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [B-56-2023]

An application has been submitted to the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board by the Department of Economic Development and Commerce, grantee of FTZ 61, requesting subzone status for the facility of PR Five Vega Alta, LLC, located in Vega Alta, Puerto Rico. The application was submitted pursuant to the provisions of the Foreign-Trade Zones Act, as amended (19 U.S.C. 81a-81u), and the regulations of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400). It was formally docketed on November 1, 2023.

The proposed subzone (61.9878 acres) is located at Carr. 690, Km. 1.3, Vega Alta, Puerto Rico. No authorization for production activity has been requested at this time.

In accordance with the FTZ Board's regulations, Camille Evans of the FTZ Staff is designated examiner to review the application and make recommendations to the FTZ Board.

                    Public comment is invited from interested parties. Submissions shall be addressed to the FTZ Board's Executive Secretary and sent to:                     *ftz@trade.gov.*                     The closing period for their receipt is December 18, 2023. Rebuttal comments in response to material submitted during the foregoing period may be submitted during the subsequent 15-day period to January 2, 2024.                

                    A copy of the application will be available for public inspection in the “Online FTZ Information Section” section of the FTZ Board's website, which is accessible via                     *www.trade.gov/​ftz.*

                    For further information, contact Camille Evans at                     *Camille.Evans@trade.gov.*

Dated: November 1, 2023.

Elizabeth Whiteman,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2023-24480 Filed 11-3-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
<PAGE>
Exhibit 11
Earnings Per Share

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                Three months ended             Nine months ended
                                                   September 30,                 September 30,
                                                2001           2000           2001           2000
                                              --------       --------       --------       --------
<S>                                           <C>            <C>            <C>            <C>
Numerator:
     Net income                               $ 61,643       $ 65,077       $586,833       $102,287


Denominator:
     Denominator for basic earnings per
         share--weighted-average shares        388,052        320,267        388,052        320,267

     Effect of dilutive securities:
         Nonqualified stock options              7,530          1,911          7,530          1,342

                                              --------       --------       --------       --------
     Denominator for diluted earnings
         per share                             395,582        322,178        395,582        321,609
                                              ========       ========       ========       ========


Basic earnings per share                      $   0.16       $   0.20       $   1.51       $   0.32
                                              ========       ========       ========       ========

Diluted earnings per share                    $   0.16       $   0.20       $   1.48       $   0.32
                                              ========       ========       ========       ========
</TABLE>


                                 Page 20 of 20
# C_2016078EN.01003201.xml

| 29.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 78/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 78/32

---

Action brought on 29 December 2015 — EK/servicegroup v OHIM (FERLI)

(Case T-775/15)

(2016/C 078/43)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: EK/servicegroup eG (Bielefeld, Germany) (represented by: T. Müller und T. Müller, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘FERLI’ — Application for Registration No 13 850 235

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 28 October 2015 in Case R 1233/2015-4

Contested decision:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 28 of Regulation No 207/2009 in conjunction with Rule 9(4) of Regulation No 2868/95; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 28 of Regulation No 207/2009 in conjunction with Rule 9(4) of Regulation No 2868/95;

| — | Infringement of the second sentence of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of the second sentence of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
### 2nd Ballast Meeting, Manufacturers & Others Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory (LBL), January 17, 1995 The second public meeting to discuss the fluorescent lamp ballast engineering data was held at the Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory on January 17, 1995. The attendee list is attached. There was a discussion of the methodology used to develop the Ballast Efficacy Factor (BEF) tables from the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) The NEMA data came from a survey taken 6 months ago. NEMA proposes establishing a BEF which would allow 90 percent of al 1 bal 1 asts i n each cl ass to be in compliance. 

### There was discussion of what i s the maximum technology i n bal 1 asts. The group identified the following max technology product variables: Max BEF , Min Total Harmonic Distortion (THD), Min electric-magnetic'interference ( EMI), Max Lamp Life, Max Power Factor, Max Reliability, Min Flicker, and Line Voltage Regulation. 

### There was a discussion of the survey for ballast sales which the Lighting Research Institute (LRI) sent to manufacturers and buyers. NEMA feels that F96T8 lamps are not a si gni fi cant part of the market. Therefore, LRI wi 11 eliminate the F96T8 ballast from the survey. Companies participating in the survey won't be identified due to confidentiality but those responding to the survey will receive a summary of the results. The shipment data received by LBL fromNEMA was discussed. For reasons of confidentiality, NEMA could not disclose all the data categories. Combined categories are identified to aid in understanding the impact of the data. Alternatives to the requested Manufacturer Impact Analysis ( MIM) data were discussed since NEMA members did not want to provide cost information. The manufacturers will probably provide MIM estimates for their competitors. The manufacturers will also comment on the cost data used in the technical support document for the March 4, 1994 proposed rule.



### NEMA recommended that LBL use ballast factors from the LE5 Luminaire Efficacy Rating standard in the COMMEND analysis. The next meeting wi 11 be a public workshop on March 17th to review the engineering economic analysis. The meeting is subject to receipt of the analysis in time for internal DOE review.AR-14 95 09:54 FROM:EAP LBL 5104866996 TO:1 202 586 3859 PAGE:02

Attendance List for Ballast Meeting an B allast Rulemaking Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory January 17, 1995

Name Associ i^Mn Phone Terry Logee Organization 202-586-1689 Isaac Turiel 

### LBL 510-486-6493 Francis Rubenstein LBL 510-486-4096 Ned Brush Copper Development Assoc. Inc.

(Consultant to) 617-891-6909

Lake Coulson NEMA 202-457-1985 Howard Wolfman Motorola Lighting 708-215-6323 Bob Wisbey Advance Transformer 708-390-5075 Eugene Margolis DOE/GC 202-586-9526 Michael Stein Magnetek 201-838-8140 Barbara Atkinson LBL 510-486-7227 Wayne Cansey Howard Industries ' 601-477-9669 Jerry Prideaux Valmont Electric 915-533-7290 Peter Biermayer 

### LBL 510-486-5983 Steve Stoft LBL 

### 510-486-7364 Jim Burke Al Gough LBL Consultant Norm Grimshaw Advance Transformer Co. 708-390-5077 Te Chan LBL 510-486-7439
**EXHIBIT32.1**

 

**CertificationPursuant to**

**18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

**As AdoptedPursuant to**

**Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofAXT, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Wilson W. Cheung, Chief Financial Officer and CorporateSecretary of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 906”),that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1) TheReport fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

 

(2) Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: May 11, 2009 | By:    | /s/ WILSON W. CHEUNG                                                                                                                      |
|--------------------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                     |   | Wilson W. Cheung*Chief Financial Officer and Corporate  Secretary  (Acting Principal Executive Officer and  Principal Financial Officer)* |

 

----
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**Certification Pursuant to**

**18 U.S.C. Section 1350**

**As Adopted Pursuant to**

**Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of AXT, Inc.(the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30,2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof(the “Report”), I, Philip C. S. Yin, Chairman of the Board and Chief ExecutiveOfficer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, asadopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“Section 906”),that, to the best of my knowledge:

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of section 13(a) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and

 

(2) The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| Dated: November 10, 2008 | By:    | /s/ Philip C. S. Yin                               |
|-------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------------------|
|                          |   | Philip C. S. Yin                                   |
|                          |   | Chairman of the  Board andChief Executive  Officer |

 

----