alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017063EN.01001101.xml

| 27.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/11

---

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 15 November 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad — Varna (Bulgaria)) — ‘MIP-TS’ OOD v Nachalnik na Mitnitsa Varna

(Case C-222/16) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Commercial policy - Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 - Article 13 - Circumvention - Implementing Regulation (EU) No 791/2011 - Open mesh fabrics of glass fibres originating in the People’s Republic of China - Anti-dumping duties - Implementing Regulations (EU) No 437/2012 and (EU) No 21/2013 - Consignment from Thailand - Extension of anti-dumping duties - Temporal scope - Community Customs Code - Post-clearance recovery of import duties))

(2017/C 063/16)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Referring court

Administrativen sad — Varna

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant:‘MIP-TS’ OOD

Applicant:

Defendant: Nachalnik na Mitnitsa Varna

Defendant:

Operative part

Operative part

Article 1(1) of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 791/2011 of 3 August 2011 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty and collecting definitively the provisional duty imposed on imports of certain open mesh fabrics of glass fibres originating in the People’s Republic of China must be interpreted as meaning that the definitive anti-dumping duty established by that provision is applicable to imports of open mesh fabrics of glass fibres, referred to in that provision, declared as having originated in Thailand and carried out prior to the entry into force of Regulation (EU) No 437/2012 of 23 May 2012 initiating an investigation concerning the possible circumvention of anti-dumping measures imposed by Implementing Regulation No 791/2011, and making those exports subject to registration, such as the imports at issue in the main proceedings, where it is established that those open mesh fabrics of glass fibres in fact originate in the People’s Republic of China.

---

(1)  OJ C 243, 4.7.2016.

1

---
EXHIBIT 13.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
 SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
 SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Alto Palermo S.A. (APSA) (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Alejandro G. Elsztain, as Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Alto Palermo S.A. (APSA)October 30, 2013.
By:
/s/ Alejandro G. ElsztainAlejandro G. ElsztainChief Executive Officer


This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except as to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
Case 2:04-cv-00938-JG Document 3 Filed 04/06/2004 Page 1 of 1

MARY DOE v. MATCH.COM, INC. et al Doc. 3

Dockets.Justia.com
<PAGE>   1

                                                                      EXHIBIT 11


                               ENERGYSOUTH, INC.
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                      (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

                                                  THREE MONTHS        TWELVE MONTHS
                                                ENDED DECEMBER 31,  ENDED DECEMBER 31,

                                                1997       1996      1997      1996
                                                ----       ----      ----      ----
<S>                                           <C>        <C>       <C>       <C>
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE:  (1)

Earnings applicable to common stock           $ 1,989    $ 2,038   $ 8,076   $ 8,865

Weighted average common shares outstanding      4,858      4,838     4,851     4,829

Basic earnings per share                      $  0.41    $  0.42   $  1.66   $  1.84

DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE:  (1)

Earnings applicable to common stock           $ 1,989    $ 2,038   $ 8,076   $ 8,865

Weighted average common shares outstanding      4,858      4,838     4,851     4,829

Incremental shares resulting from assumed
    exercise of stock options                      69         23        49        17

Weighted average common shares outstanding,
    assuming dilution                           4,927      4,861     4,900     4,846

Diluted earnings per share                    $  0.40    $  0.42   $  1.65   $  1.83
</TABLE>

 (1) Restated to reflect three-for-two conversion of Mobile Gas common stock
     into EnergySouth common stock effective February 2, 1998. See Note 1 of
     Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company's
     Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 1997.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

We, Ricardo Puente, Chief Executive Officer and Joan M. Fiorito, Chief Financial
Officer of TransWestern Publishing Company LLC (the "Company"), certify,
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, that:

(1)   the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period
      ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
      78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

Dated August 12, 2002

                                                  /s/ RICARDO PUENTE
                                                  -----------------------
                                                  Ricardo Puente
                                                  Chief Executive Officer

                                                  /s/ JOAN M. FIORITO
                                                  -----------------------
                                                  Joan M. Fiorito
                                                  Chief Financial Officer
# C_2017382EN.01001901.xml

| 13.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 382/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 382/19

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 20 September 2017 — Tilly-Sabco SAS v European Commission, Doux SA

(Case C-183/16 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Agriculture - Poultrymeat - Frozen chickens - Export refunds - Implementing Regulation (EU) No 689/2013 fixing the refund at EUR 0 - Legality - Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 - Articles 162 and 164 - Subject matter and nature of the refunds - Criteria for fixing the amount - Powers of the Director-General of the Directorate-General (DG) for Agriculture and Rural Development to sign the contested regulation - Misuse of powers - ‘Comitology’ - Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 - Article 3(3) - Consultation with the Committee for the Common Organisation of the Agricultural Markets - Presentation of the draft implementing regulation during the meeting of that committee - Compliance with time limits - Infringement of essential procedural requirements - Annulment with maintenance of the effects))

(2017/C 382/22)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Tilly-Sabco SAS (represented by: R. Milchior, F. Le Roquais and S. Charbonnel, lawyers)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: A. Lewis and K. Skelly, acting as Agents), Doux SA

Other party to the proceedings:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 14 January 2016, Tilly-Sabco v Commission (T-397/13, EU:T:2016:8); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 14 January 2016, Tilly-Sabco v Commission (T-397/13, EU:T:2016:8);

| 2. | Annuls Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 689/2013 of 18 July 2013 fixing the export refunds on poultrymeat; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Annuls Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 689/2013 of 18 July 2013 fixing the export refunds on poultrymeat;

| 3. | Maintains the effects of Implementing Regulation No 689/2013 until the entry into force of a new act intended to replace it; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Maintains the effects of Implementing Regulation No 689/2013 until the entry into force of a new act intended to replace it;

| 4. | Orders the European Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the European Commission to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 211, 13.6.2016.

1

---
Dear	FAA,

Please	be	advised	that	the	primary	phone	contact	for	KVARA	Inc.	is	now	

219-512-0018.	The	old	phone	number	listed	within the	KVARA,	Inc.	–

Exemption/Rulemaking	PDF is	no	longer	in	service.

Sincerely,

Michael	Triana	

CEO	KVARA,	Inc.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bear Island Paper Company LLC (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended
September 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Edward D. Sherrick, Vice President of Finance [Chief Financial Officer] of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section
1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



By:

/s/ Edward D. SherrickEdward D. Sherrick Vice President of Finance (Chief Financial Officer) November 14, 2003




This certification accompanies
the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Act of 1934, as amended.



14
Case No. 8,347.

#### LILIENTHAL’S TOBACCO v. UNITED STATES.

[The case reported under above title in 15 Int. Rev. Rec. 19, is the same as Case No. 16,-106a.]
exhibit1044






Exhibit 10.44    CERTAIN INFORMATION IDENTIFIED WITH [***] HAS BEEN EXCLUDED FROM THIS EXHIBIT  BECAUSE IT IS BOTH (i) NOT MATERIAL AND (ii) WOULD BE COMPETITIVELY HARMFUL IF  PUBLICLY DISCLOSED.    Applied Technologies Center  315 Sigma Drive  Summerville, SC  29486  www.ati.org    92634904_5    January 12, 2021  Novavax, Inc.  21 Firstfield Road  Gaithersburg, MD  20878  Attention: Mr. [***]  Subject:  Modification No. 05 to Project Agreement No. 01; MCDC2011-001  Reference: MCDC Base Agreement No. 2020-530  Dear [***]:  In accordance with the terms and conditions of the referenced MCDC Base Agreement, Modification No. 05  hereby amends the Project Agreement No. 01 as follows:  DESCRIPTION OF MODIFICATION  1) The Health Resource Priority and Allocations Systems (HRPAS) clause of the Project Agreement is  hereby incorporated into the definitized agreement as indicated below:  18.  Health Resource Priority and Allocations Systems (HRPAS)  In order to ensure the success of the Project Agreement Holder’s efforts, a priority rating is incorporated into  the project agreement for the procurement of raw materials, consumables, repair parts, and major end item  assemblies by the Project Agreement Holder under Title I of the HRPAS.  Priority Rating: Defense Production Act (DPA) Title I – “DO-HR”  Each rated order executed by the Project Agreement Holder must include the following:  (a) The priority rating: DPA Title I – “DO-HR”;  (b) A required delivery date or dates. The words “immediately” or “as soon as possible” do not constitute a  delivery date;  (c) The written signature on a manually placed order, or the digital signature or name on an electronically  placed order, of an individual authorized to sign rated orders for the person placing the order; and  (d) A statement that reads in substance:  (1) This is a rated order certified for national defense use, and you are required to follow all the  provisions of the Health Resources Priorities and Allocations System regulation at 45 CFR part 101.  (2) If the rated order is placed in support of emergency preparedness requirements and expedited  action is necessary and appropriate to meet these requirements, the following sentences should be  added following the statement set forth in paragraph (d)(1) of this section:  i. This rated order is placed for the purpose of emergency preparedness. It must be accepted  or rejected within two (2) days after receipt of the order if:  A. The order is issued in response to a hazard that has occurred; or   





 






  92634904_5  B. If the order is issued to prepare for an imminent hazard, as specified in HRPAS  § 101.33(e).  Except as provided herein, all Terms and Conditions of the referenced MCDC Base Agreement, Project  Agreement and preceding modifications remain unchanged and in full force and effect.  This modification is issued unilaterally. The Project Agreement Holder is not required to sign to finalize this  action.  Advanced Technology International  By: /s/ [***]  Name: [***]  Title: Contracts Administrator   Date: Jan 12 2021
No. 49550.

#### Protest 46191-K of F & M Importing Co. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and cited cases an allowance of *2%*percent was made for certain Sardo cheese similar to that the subject of Abstract 42178, and an allowance was also made, following Abstracts 36724 and 38185, for the weight of the paper or foil, or both, in which certain cheese was wrapped. The protest was sustained to this extent.
# C_2020019EN.01000201.xml

| 20.1.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 19/2 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.1.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 19/2

---

Order of the Court (First Chamber) of 3 July 2019 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Juzgado de Primera Instancia No 1 de Fuenlabrada — Spain) — Bankia SA v Henry-Rodolfo Rengifo Jiménez, Sheyla-Jeanneth Felix Caiza

(Case C-92/16) (1)

(Reference for a preliminary ruling - Consumer protection - Directive 93/13/EEC - Articles 6 and 7 - Unfair terms in consumer contracts - Accelerated repayment term in a mortgage loan agreement - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Question identical to a question on which the Court has already ruled or where the reply to such a question may be clearly deduced from existing case-law - Declaration that the term is unfair in part - Powers of the national court when dealing with a term regarded as ‘unfair’ - Replacement of the unfair term with a provision of national law - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Question manifestly inadmissible)

(2020/C 19/02)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Juzgado de Primera Instancia No 1 de Fuenlabrada

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Bankia SA

Defendants: Henry-Rodolfo Rengifo Jiménez, Sheyla-Jeanneth Felix Caiza

Operative part of the order

Articles 6 and 7 of Council Directive 93/13/EEC of 5 April 1993 on unfair terms in consumer contracts must be interpreted, on the one hand, as precluding an accelerated repayment term found to be unfair in a mortgage loan contract from being maintained in part through the removal by the national court of the elements which render it unfair. On the other hand, those articles do not preclude the national court from remedying the invalidity of such an unfair term — the wording of which is based on a legislative provision which is applicable where the parties to the contract so agree — by replacing that term with the new wording of that legislative provision introduced after the conclusion of the contract, where the contract at issue is not capable of continuing in existence following the removal of that unfair term and where the cancellation of the contract in its entirety exposes the consumer to particularly unfavourable consequences.

---

(1)  OJ C 156, 2.5.2016.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-29-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAY-01-1999
<CASH>                                          11,030
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                    162,105
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               224,191
<PP&E>                                         192,039
<DEPRECIATION>                                (69,681)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 361,938
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          124,215
<BONDS>                                        285,523
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          155,992
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        70,380
<OTHER-SE>                                   (319,467)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   361,938
<SALES>                                        142,280
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               142,975
<CGS>                                           78,918
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  147,091
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               9,244
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (13,360)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,350
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (8,010)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (8,010)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 117 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 117

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
To designate a mountain peak in the State of Montana as ``Alex Diekmann 
                                Peak''.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Alex Diekmann Peak Designation Act 
of 2017''.

SEC. 2. DESIGNATION OF ALEX DIEKMANN PEAK, MONTANA.

    (a) In General.--The unnamed 9,765-foot peak located 2.2 miles 
west-northwest of Finger Mountain on the western boundary of the Lee 
Metcalf Wilderness, Montana (UTM coordinates Zone 12, 457966 E., 
4982589 N.), shall be known and designated as ``Alex Diekmann Peak''.
    (b) References.--Any reference in a law, map, regulation, document, 
record, or other paper of the United States to the peak described in 
subsection (a) shall be considered to be a reference to ``Alex Diekmann 
Peak''.

            Passed the Senate December 20, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
115th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                 S. 117

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

To designate a mountain peak in the State of Montana as ``Alex Diekmann 
                                Peak''.
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MONGER : CIVIL ACTION

:

 :

 v. :

:

 : 

BERENHOLZ : NO. 02-2757

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 6th day of September, 2002, in accordance with the court's

procedure for random reassignment of cases, it is hereby

ORDERED that the above-captioned case is reassigned from the calendar of

the Honorable William H. Yohn, Jr. to the calendar of the Honorable Timothy J. Savage.

 FOR THE COURT:

 JAMES T. GILES 

 Chief Judge

 ATTEST:

 ___________________

 MICHAEL E. KUNZ

 Clerk of Court

Case 2:02-cv-02757-TJS Document 6 Filed 09/06/2002 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JOHNSON, : CIVIL ACTION

: NO. 04-2835

Petitioner, :

:

v. :

:

:

FOLINO, et al., :

:

Respondents. :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 23rd day of November 2009, the Court

concluding that procedural default bars review of Petitioner’s

Brady claim, it is hereby ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion to

Compel Deposition of Berks County Sheriff Eric Weaknecht (doc.

no. 142) is DENIED as moot;

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED Respondents’ Motion for Leave to

File Response to Petitioner’s Supplemental Motion (doc. nos. 157,

159) is DENIED.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

 S/Eduardo C. Robreno 

EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, J.
<Page>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                     CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

    In connection with this amendment No. 1 to the annual report of General
Maritime Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the period ending
December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of
the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:

    (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
        Company.

    This certification is made solely for the purposes of 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, and not for any other purpose.



/s/ PETER C. GEORGIOPOULOS
------------------------------------
Peter C. Georgiopoulos
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer, and
President