alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

LARRY LAWRENCE : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. :

:

THOMAS H. HOGAN, et al. : NO. 04-1647 

ORDER

AND NOW, this 2nd day of June, 2005, whereas the

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus attacks both the petitioner’s

state court conviction and his deportation proceedings; whereas

United States Magistrate Judge Jacob P. Hart issued a Report and

Recommendation recommending that the Petition for Writ of Habeas

Corpus be denied in part and transferred in part; whereas Judge

Hart recommended that the petition be denied to the extent the

petition attacks the state court conviction and to the extent the

petition attacks his deportation proceedings, the petition be

transferred to the United States District Court for the Middle

District of Pennsylvania; whereas on January 6, 2005, the Court

issued an order in which it agreed with the defendants that this

was the appropriate court to adjudicate the immigration issues;

whereas the Court thereafter appointed Mr. Steven Morley to

represent the petitioner on the immigration part of the petition;

whereas the Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Act for

Defense, the Global War on Terror, and Tsunami Relief, 2005, Pub.

L. No. 109-13, 119 Stat. 231 (2005), which became effective with

Case 2:04-cv-01647-MAM Document 29 Filed 06/02/05 Page 1 of 2
2

the President’s signature on May 11, 2005, and, inter alia,

amended the Judicial Review provisions of Section 242 of the

Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1252, to provide that

courts of appeal “shall be the sole and exclusive means for

judicial review of an order of removal entered or issued under

any provision of” the Immigration and Nationality Act, see

§ 106(a)(1)(B), and providing that for any action currently

(“challenging a final administrative order of removal,

deportation, or exclusion . . . in a district court on the date

of the enactment of this division . . . the district court shall

transfer the case . . . to the court of appeals for the circuit

in which a petition for review could have been properly filed,”

see § 106(c); and, whereas the parties agree that the immigration

claim should be transferred to the United States Court of Appeals

for the Third Circuit, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and

Recommendation of Judge Hart is approved and adopted with respect

to the petitioner’s attack on his conviction. The Court has

already rejected the Report and Recommendation with respect to

the jurisdiction of this Court to consider the immigration

issues. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is transferred to

the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Mary A. McLaughlin

MARY A. McLAUGHLIN, J.

Case 2:04-cv-01647-MAM Document 29 Filed 06/02/05 Page 2 of 2
No. 55163.

#### Geo. Wm. Rueff, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 148406-K/13020 (New Orleans).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

An examination of the papers in the case disclosing no reason to disturb the action of the collector, which was presumptively correct, the protest was overruled.
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 969 

Recognizing the accomplishments and the economic contributions of lesbian, 

gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) entrepreneurs and small business 

owners. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 26, 2018 

Mrs. MURPHY of Florida (for herself, Ms. ROS-LEHTINEN, and Mr. POCAN) 

submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 

on Energy and Commerce 

RESOLUTION 

Recognizing the accomplishments and the economic contributions of lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) 

entrepreneurs and small business owners. 

Whereas according to the National LGBT Chamber of Commerce (NGLCC), there are an estimated 1.4 million 

LGBT-owned businesses across the United States; 

Whereas over 1,000 businesses are NGLCC-certified LGBT 

Business Enterprises (LGBTBEs) and majority owned, 

operated, managed, and controlled by LGBT Americans; 

Whereas LGBT-certified companies reported an average of 

$2.5 million in annual revenues and contribute over 

$1.15 billion to the United States economy; 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 969 IH 

Whereas if all estimated LGBT-owned businesses in America 

are combined, the economic contribution exceeds $1.7 

trillion; 

Whereas the majority of certified LGBT-owned businesses 

are located in the States of California, New York, Texas, 

Florida, and Georgia with support provided by a network 

of affiliated LGBT chambers of commerce throughout 

the United States; 

Whereas certified LGBT-owned businesses have created over 

33,000 jobs in the United States; 

Whereas certified LGBT-owned businesses survive an average 

of 12 years, despite the national average for small business closures being 5 years; 

Whereas LGBT entrepreneurs have started successful small 

businesses across a wide variety of industries, including 

consulting, marketing, construction, legal services, and 

defense contracting; 

Whereas a certified LGBT-owned firm was selected as the 

2016 Small Business of the Year by the Small Business 

Administration; and 

Whereas despite decades of discrimination on the basis of 

sexual orientation and gender identity, LGBT entrepreneurs and small business owners continue to fight for 

equal opportunities across key aspects of life such as employment, housing, and credit: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives recog2 nizes the accomplishments and economic contributions of 

3 LGBT entrepreneurs and small business owners in the 

4 United States. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
# C_2017402EN.01000501.xml

| 27.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 402/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 402/5

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 October 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division) — United Kingdom) — Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs v Mercedes-Benz Financial Services UK Ltd

(Case C-164/16) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Article 14(2)(b) - Supply of goods - Motor vehicles - Finance lease with an option to purchase))

(2017/C 402/05)

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Referring court

Court of Appeal (England & Wales) (Civil Division)

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue & Customs

Applicant:

Defendant: Mercedes-Benz Financial Services UK Ltd

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The words ‘contract for hire which provides that in the normal course of events ownership is to pass at the latest upon payment of the final instalment’, used in Article 14(2)(b) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, must be interpreted as applying to a leasing contract with an option to purchase if it can be inferred from the financial terms of the contract that exercising the option appears to be the only economically rational choice that the lessee will be able to make at the appropriate time if the contract is performed for its full term, which it is for the national court to ascertain.

---

(1)  OJ C 191, 30.5.2016.

1

---
No. 61742.

#### Kamkap, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 310474-K (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

The protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
# C_2018112EN.01000301.xml

| 26.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 1 February 2018 — Kühne + Nagel International AG, Kühne + Nagel Management AG, Kühne + Nagel Ltd, Kühne + Nagel Ltd, Kühne + Nagel Ltd v European Commission

(Case C-261/16 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Article 101 TFEU - Price fixing - International air freight forwarding services - Tariff agreement affecting the final price of services))

(2018/C 112/03)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Appellants: Kühne + Nagel International AG, Kühne + Nagel Management AG, Kühne + Nagel Ltd, Kühne + Nagel Ltd, Kühne + Nagel Ltd (represented by: U. Denzel, C. von Köckritz and C. Klöppner, Rechtsanwälte)

Appellants:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: A. Dawes, H. Leupold and G. Meessen, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Kühne + Nagel International AG, Kühne + Nagel Management AG, Kühne + Nagel Ltd (Uxbridge (United Kingdom)), Kühne + Nagel Ltd (Shanghai (China)) and Kühne + Nagel Ltd (Hong-Kong (China)) to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Kühne + Nagel International AG, Kühne + Nagel Management AG, Kühne + Nagel Ltd (Uxbridge (United Kingdom)), Kühne + Nagel Ltd (Shanghai (China)) and Kühne + Nagel Ltd (Hong-Kong (China)) to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 251, 11.7.2016.

1

---
No. 52512.

protests 132856-K and 132857-K (Seattle).

#### G. R. Frix *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It having been held repeatedly that Ifche Customs Court sitting in classification has no jurisdiction to entertain a question of the value of imported merchandise, but that such an issue should be raised by appeal to reappraisement under section 501, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, the motion to dismiss was granted.
# C_2017161EN.01001702.xml

| 22.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 161/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 161/17

---

Order of the President of the Second Chamber of the Court of 10 March 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Supremo Tribunal de Justiça — Portugal) — Sociedade Metropolitana de Desenvolvimento SA v Banco Santander Totta SA

(Case C-136/16) (1)

1

(2017/C 161/23)

Language of the case: Portuguese

The President of the Second Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 165, 10.5.2016.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 216 (Thursday, November 9, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 77373]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-24721]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 9, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
October 31, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] Contract 
86 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, 
Docket Nos. MC2024-30, CP2024-30.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2023-24721 Filed 11-8-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
1

 Defendant also requested all documents and information respecting Plaintiff s

association with DHL. (Def. s Mot. Disc. Relief, ¶ 2). Plaintiff s Response to the request states

that [t]he Plaintiff has never to his knowledge been associated with DHL.  (Pl. s Answer Def. s

Mot. Discv. Relief, ¶ 2). 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

 

:

ANTHONY BARBEE, : CIVIL ACTION

:

Plaintiff, :

:

v. : No. 04-4063

:

SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA :

TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY, :

:

Defendant. :

 :

O R D E R

 

AND NOW, this 3rd day of January, 2006, upon consideration of Defendant s

Motion for Discovery Relief (Doc. No. 22), and Plaintiff s Response thereto, it is hereby

ORDERED that Plaintiff must provide the following:

1. a list documenting (a) each and every automobile accident (or other injury

causing event) in which Plaintiff was involved in the past twenty years; (b)

whether the automobile accident (or other injury causing event) resulted in

litigation; (c) if litigation ensued, the docket number or court term and

number under which the ligation was filed; (d) the results of the litigation

(e.g., settlement or jury verdict); (e) the recovery (if any) made by

Plaintiff; the Court term and number of any litigation (i.e., non-tort

litigation) in which the Plaintiff was involved in the past twenty years

(including litigation against SEPTA); (f) the results of the litigation (e.g.,

settlement or jury verdict); (g) the recovery (if any) made by the Plaintiff;

and (h) all discoverable documents for these lawsuits, including the

complaint filed in each lawsuit; and

2. the complete factual basis for each allegation that a person was improperly

given an alternate duty position ahead of the Plaintiff.1

Case 2:04-cv-04063-RK Document 24 Filed 01/03/06 Page 1 of 2
2

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall provide the aforementioned 

documentation to Defendant on or before Friday, January 13, 2006. Any delay or noncompliance with this Order will result in sanctions and/or the dismissal of this action. 

BY THE COURT:

s/ Robert F. Kelly 

Robert F. Kelly, Sr. J. 

Case 2:04-cv-04063-RK Document 24 Filed 01/03/06 Page 2 of 2
No. 50884.

#### Protests 120906-K, etc., of Canada Dry Ginger Ale, Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v. No. 98-7824

JOHN FITZGERALD PRESCOTT,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt.

Peter J. Messitte, District Judge.

(CR-95-323-PJM, CA-98-2131-PJM)

Submitted: March 25, 1999

Decided: April 5, 1999

Before WILKINS and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and

BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

_________________________________________________________________

Vacated and remanded by unpublished per curiam opinion.

_________________________________________________________________

COUNSEL

John Fitzgerald Prescott, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Clayton White,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore,

Maryland, for Appellee.

_________________________________________________________________

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c).
OPINION

PER CURIAM:

John Fitzgerald Prescott appeals from the district court's orders

denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 &

Supp. 1998), and denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) motion to alter or

amend the judgment. The district court denied the Rule 59(e) motion

as moot, apparently believing that Prescott's notice of appeal deprived

it of authority to act on the motion. However, the appeal is not properly before this court until the district court has ruled on the Rule

59(e) motion. Accordingly, we grant a certificate of appealability as

to the order denying Prescott's Rule 59(e) motion, vacate said order,

and remand to the district court for a ruling on the Rule 59(e) motion.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

VACATED AND REMANDED

 2
Exhibit 10.10


 


June 1, 2015


 


Michael P. McKenna


 


Dear Mike:


 


On behalf of Quantum-Si Incorporated, I
am pleased to offer you a position as President and Chief Operating Officer beginning June 1, 2015. Your annualized compensation
in this position will consist of an annual base salary of $200,000, paid in twice monthly pay periods, less required deductions.


 


In addition to the outlined cash compensation,
you will receive 937,500 shares of restricted stock in Quantum-Si, which will vest over a four year period with the following schedule:
187,500 on March 31, 2016, and 20,833 shares at the end of each of the next 36 months thereafter. Quantum-Si also agrees to make
you a $100,000 loan, which will be forgiven on May 31, 2017, unless your employment is terminated with Quantum-Si for any reason
prior to that date. In the case of your termination for any reason prior to May 31, 2017, the loan will be due and payable in full
on such termination date.


 


You will be based out of Quantum-Si’s
facility in Guilford, CT.


 


As an employee of Quantum-Si, you will
be eligible for 15 days of paid time off each calendar year, pro-rated for any partial year based on your start date. All vacation
must be used by the end of each calendar year. In no event will any employee be compensated for unused vacation time. You will
also be eligible to participate in medical and other benefit plans as of July 1, 2015, in accordance with the rules and eligibility
of those plans currently in effect. Further, while we expect you to remain with Quantum-Si for a long time, this letter is not
an employment contract and you will be an at-will employee.


 


Quantum-Si considers the protection of
its confidential information, proprietary materials and goodwill to be extremely important. As a condition of this offer of employment,
you are required to sign the Confidentiality, Intellectual Property, and Non-Compete Agreement enclosed with this letter.


 


We appreciate your exceptional talent and
are very excited about you joining our young team. We firmly believe that we offer a unique combination of emotional, intellectual,
and interpersonal stimulation that will be truly enjoyable. As one of the early members of our team you will be in the rare position
of shaping the culture and direction of our organization from the very beginning. We have tremendous opportunities ahead of us,
and I am confident you have the expertise required to help us achieve our objectives. If you have any questions regarding this
offer, the position, or the company’s benefits programs, please do not hesitate to reach out.


 






     


     


    

 





 


Please note that this offer will expire
on Tuesday, June 9, 2015 unless accepted by you in writing prior to such date.


 


	 	Sincerely,
	 	 
	 	Quantum-Si Incorporated
	 	 
		By:	/s/ Elizabeth A. Whayland
	 	Name:   Elizabeth A. Whayland
	 	Title:     Asst Secretary



 


	ACCEPTED AND AGREED:	 
	 	 
	Signature:	/s/
    Michael P. McKenna	 
	Name:        Michael P. McKenna
David N. Baker 

Department of Energy 

Washington. DC 20585 

April 24, 2012 

Counsel, Government Regulations & 

Regulatory Compliance 

OF. Appliances 

Appliance Park. AP2-225 

Louisville, K Y 40225 

Dear Mr. Baker: 

This letter is in response to your February 17.2012, petition for waiver and application for 

interim waiver from the test procedure applicable to residential clothes washers under Title 1001' 

the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), pm 430, The U.s, Department of Energy (DOE) 

issued a final rule revising the clothes washer test procedure set forth in 10 CFR pan 430. 

subpart B, appendix JI in the Federal Register on March 7, 2012 (77 FR 13888). DOE also 

established a new appendix J2; manufacturers will be required to certify compliance using 

appendix J2 on the compliance date of any amended standards for clothes washers. This tinal 

rule was effective on April 6, 2012. 

The test procedure revisions in appendices J 1 and J2 address clothes wash~rs with basket 

volumes greater than 3.8 cubic feet (sec Table 5.1). Therefore, a waiver is no longer necessary 

for the basic models specified in GE's petition for waivcr dated February 17, 2012 with basket 

volumes greatcr than 3.8 cubic feet. 

If you have any questions concerning this matter, please contact Mr. Bryan Berringer of my staff. 

at (202) 586-0371. 

John Cymbalsky 

Supervisor. Appliance Standards Analysis 

Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy 

* Printed with tat Klk on recycled paper
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MARA FLAMM : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. :

:

SARNER & ASSOCIATES, P.C.; JOSHUA SARNER; : NO. 02-4302

LEONARD SARNER, ESQUIRE; :

JODI H. BROWN, M.D.; JOHN MATUSAVAGE; :

JOHN DOE PROCESS SERVER, INDIVIDUALLY AND :

AS AGENT FOR SARNER 7 ASSOCIATES, P.C.; :

JOSHUA SARNER, ESQUIRE; LEONARD SARNER, :

ESQUIRE; AND JODI H. BROWN, M.D. :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 4th day of February, 2003, after conducting a telephone status conference

with counsel in the above-captioned action, it is hereby ORDERED that: 

1. Discovery is extended one hundred twenty (120) days from the date of this Order, but no

later than June 4, 2003.

2. A Telephone Status Conference will be held on June 5, 2003, at 10:00 a.m. to

determine whether discovery has been completed, to set a time frame for expert discovery and/or

dispositive motions, as well as to explore the possibility of a resolution of this matter. Plaintiff’s

counsel is directed to initiate this conference call to (215) 597-6079.

BY THE COURT:

 

M. FAITH ANGELL

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 37 Filed 02/05/2003 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of J.Crew Group, Inc. and J.Crew Operating Corp. (collectively, the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Millard S. Drexler, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and James S. Scully, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of each of our knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|Dated: September 13, 2005                                           
|                                                                    
|/s/ Millard S. Drexler                                              
|Millard S. Drexler Chairman of the Board and
Chief Executive Officer
|                                                                    
|/s/ James S. Scully                                                 
|Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer                



A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.