alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
PH2\662705.1 -1-

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

THE CHESTER COUNTY HOSPITAL, : CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-2746

701 E. MARSHALL STREET :

WEST CHESTER, PA 19380 :

:

PLAINTIFF :

v. :

:

INDEPENDENCE BLUE CROSS :

1901 MARKET STREET :

PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103 :

:

QCC INSURANCE COMPANY :

1902 MARKET STREET :

PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103 :

:

KEYSTONE HEALTH PLAN EAST :

1901 MARKET STREET :

PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103 :

:

KEYSTONE MERCY HEALTH PLAN :

200 STEVENS DRIVE :

SUITE 350 :

PHILADELPHIA, PA 19113 :

:

DEFENDANTS :

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF COUNSEL

Barbara H. Ryland, Esq., of Crowell & Moring LLP hereby gives notice to

this Court of withdrawal of her appearance as counsel for plaintiff, The Chester

County Hospital, in the above-captioned action.

WHEREFORE, the undersigned respectfully requests that the Court take

notice of withdrawal of Ms. Ryland as counsel.

Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 12 Filed 06/27/2002 Page 1 of 3
PH2\662705.1 -2-

CROWELL & MORING LLP

Date: June 27, 2002 By: 

Attorney for

THE CHESTER COUNTY HOSPITAL

Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 12 Filed 06/27/2002 Page 2 of 3
PH2\662705.1 -3-

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, LEWIS R. OLSHIN, ESQUIRE, hereby certify that a true and correct

copy of the foregoing Notice of Withdrawal of Counsel for Barbara H. Ryland,

Esquire, has been served upon the following counsel by first class mail,

postage pre-paid, on June 27, 2002.

Thomas A. Leonard, Esquire

Obermayer, Rebmann, Maxwell & Hippel, LLP

One Penn Center, 19th Floor

1617 John F. Kennedy Boulevard

Philadelphia, PA 19103

John DeQ. Briggs, III, Esquire

Howrey, Arnold, Simon & White, LLP

1299 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20004-2402

 

Lewis R. Olshin, Esquire

Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 12 Filed 06/27/2002 Page 3 of 3
Case 2:04-cv-05299-JKG Document 1 Filed 11/12/04 Page 1 of 49
Case 2:04-cv-05299-JKG Document 1 Filed 11/12/04 Page 2 of 49
Case 2:04-cv-05299-JKG Document 1 Filed 11/12/04 Page 3 of 49
Case 2:04-cv-05299-JKG Document 1 Filed 11/12/04 Page 4 of 49
Case 2:04-cv-05299-JKG Document 1 Filed 11/12/04 Page 5 of 49
Case 2:04-cv-05299-JKG Document 1 Filed 11/12/04 Page 6 of 49
Case 2:04-cv-05299-JKG Document 1 Filed 11/12/04 Page 7 of 49
Case 2:04-cv-05299-JKG Document 1 Filed 11/12/04 Page 8 of 49
Case 2:04-cv-05299-JKG Document 1 Filed 11/12/04 Page 9 of 49
Case 2:04-cv-05299-JKG Document 1 Filed 11/12/04 Page 10 of 49
Case 2:04-cv-05299-JKG Document 1 Filed 11/12/04 Page 11 of 49
Case 2:04-cv-05299-JKG Document 1 Filed 11/12/04 Page 12 of 49
Case 2:04-cv-05299-JKG Document 1 Filed 11/12/04 Page 13 of 49
Case 2:04-cv-05299-JKG Document 1 Filed 11/12/04 Page 14 of 49
Case 2:04-cv-05299-JKG Document 1 Filed 11/12/04 Page 15 of 49
Case 2:04-cv-05299-JKG Document 1 Filed 11/12/04 Page 16 of 49
Case 2:04-cv-05299-JKG Document 1 Filed 11/12/04 Page 17 of 49
Case 2:04-cv-05299-JKG Document 1 Filed 11/12/04 Page 18 of 49
Case 2:04-cv-05299-JKG Document 1 Filed 11/12/04 Page 19 of 49
Case 2:04-cv-05299-JKG Document 1 Filed 11/12/04 Page 20 of 49
Case 2:04-cv-05299-JKG Document 1 Filed 11/12/04 Page 21 of 49
Case 2:04-cv-05299-JKG Document 1 Filed 11/12/04 Page 22 of 49
Case 2:04-cv-05299-JKG Document 1 Filed 11/12/04 Page 23 of 49
Case 2:04-cv-05299-JKG Document 1 Filed 11/12/04 Page 24 of 49
Case 2:04-cv-05299-JKG Document 1 Filed 11/12/04 Page 25 of 49
Case 2:04-cv-05299-JKG Document 1 Filed 11/12/04 Page 26 of 49
Case 2:04-cv-05299-JKG Document 1 Filed 11/12/04 Page 27 of 49
Case 2:04-cv-05299-JKG Document 1 Filed 11/12/04 Page 28 of 49
Case 2:04-cv-05299-JKG Document 1 Filed 11/12/04 Page 29 of 49
Case 2:04-cv-05299-JKG Document 1 Filed 11/12/04 Page 30 of 49
Case 2:04-cv-05299-JKG Document 1 Filed 11/12/04 Page 31 of 49
Case 2:04-cv-05299-JKG Document 1 Filed 11/12/04 Page 32 of 49
Case 2:04-cv-05299-JKG Document 1 Filed 11/12/04 Page 33 of 49
Case 2:04-cv-05299-JKG Document 1 Filed 11/12/04 Page 34 of 49
Case 2:04-cv-05299-JKG Document 1 Filed 11/12/04 Page 35 of 49
Case 2:04-cv-05299-JKG Document 1 Filed 11/12/04 Page 36 of 49
Case 2:04-cv-05299-JKG Document 1 Filed 11/12/04 Page 37 of 49
Case 2:04-cv-05299-JKG Document 1 Filed 11/12/04 Page 38 of 49
Case 2:04-cv-05299-JKG Document 1 Filed 11/12/04 Page 39 of 49
Case 2:04-cv-05299-JKG Document 1 Filed 11/12/04 Page 40 of 49
Case 2:04-cv-05299-JKG Document 1 Filed 11/12/04 Page 41 of 49
Case 2:04-cv-05299-JKG Document 1 Filed 11/12/04 Page 42 of 49
Case 2:04-cv-05299-JKG Document 1 Filed 11/12/04 Page 43 of 49
Case 2:04-cv-05299-JKG Document 1 Filed 11/12/04 Page 44 of 49
Case 2:04-cv-05299-JKG Document 1 Filed 11/12/04 Page 45 of 49
Case 2:04-cv-05299-JKG Document 1 Filed 11/12/04 Page 46 of 49
Case 2:04-cv-05299-JKG Document 1 Filed 11/12/04 Page 47 of 49
Case 2:04-cv-05299-JKG Document 1 Filed 11/12/04 Page 48 of 49
Case 2:04-cv-05299-JKG Document 1 Filed 11/12/04 Page 49 of 49
Before the Second Division,

November 26, 1958

No. 62477.

#### Ali Shabbir Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 244165-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of filaments similar in all material respects to those involved in Abstract 61832, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
- [Untitled]_2012042420550800
- [Untitled]_2012042420561900
# 2015_09 Pivot Table 5B

&A	

# 2015_09 MTS Table 5

&F	

&P/&N
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-5 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 1 of 41
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-5 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 2 of 41
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-5 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 3 of 41
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-5 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 4 of 41
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-5 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 5 of 41
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-5 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 6 of 41
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-5 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 7 of 41
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-5 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 8 of 41
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-5 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 9 of 41
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-5 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 10 of 41
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-5 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 11 of 41
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-5 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 12 of 41
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-5 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 13 of 41
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-5 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 14 of 41
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-5 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 15 of 41
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-5 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 16 of 41
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-5 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 17 of 41
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-5 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 18 of 41
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-5 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 19 of 41
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-5 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 20 of 41
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-5 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 21 of 41
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-5 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 22 of 41
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-5 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 23 of 41
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-5 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 24 of 41
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-5 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 25 of 41
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-5 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 26 of 41
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-5 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 27 of 41
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-5 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 28 of 41
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-5 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 29 of 41
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-5 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 30 of 41
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-5 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 31 of 41
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-5 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 32 of 41
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-5 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 33 of 41
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-5 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 34 of 41
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-5 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 35 of 41
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-5 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 36 of 41
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-5 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 37 of 41
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-5 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 38 of 41
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-5 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 39 of 41
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-5 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 40 of 41
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 70-5 Filed 03/07/2005 Page 41 of 41
No. 49566.

#### Protests 43098-K, etc., of Balfour Guthrie & Co., Ltd., et al. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Berle M. Schiller 5614 United States Courthouse

 JUDGE Independence Mall West

 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19106

 

 267-299-7620

 

June 23, 2003

NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT

Re: Richard Keck v. PPL, Inc.

Docket No. 02-CV-4071

Dear Counsel:

Please be advised that Oral Argument regarding cross motions for summary judgment in

the above-referenced matter has been scheduled by the Honorable Berle M. Schiller for Tuesday,

July 1, 2003 at 8:30 A.M. in Courtroom 5C, U.S. Courthouse, 601 Market Street, Philadelphia,

Pennsylvania.

Very truly yours,

Patricia A. Callahan

(267) 299-7621

Deputy Clerk to

Hon. Berle M. Schiller

Case 2:02-cv-04071-BMS Document 16 Filed 06/23/2003 Page 1 of 1
No. 63572.

protests 312596-K, etc. (Boston).

#### Canada Dry Ginger Ale, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
CARLTON BROOKS,

Petitioner,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

___________________________/

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO 

FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND 

DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D16-4156

Opinion filed November 4, 2016.

Petition for Writ of Mandamus -- Original Jurisdiction.

Carlton Brooks, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied as premature.

B.L. THOMAS, WETHERELL, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., CONCUR.
| (1) | the      annual report on Form 10-K of Jammin Java  Corp. for the year      ended January 31, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements      of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;      and |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Jammin Java      Corp. |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |   | /s/ Shane      Whittle                                                      Shane      WhittlePresident,      Secretary and Treasurer Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive      Officer Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting      Officer) |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |
|   |   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             |

----
IPAC Operational Metrics for February 2022

‘Volume by Transaction Type ]

Dollar Amount| % of Total Dollar Amount] ‘Number of Transactions] _%6of Total Number of Transactions|

Fiduciary (investment & Borrowing) 21,494,332,612,984] 95.76%4| 19,964] 16.91%]

[Buy/sell "39,604,929,519| 0.18% 36,365] 82.06%]

Benefits (RITS) '6,833,809,238) 0.03%] 372| 0.3256)
[check Aftermath (TRACS) 356,745,407 | 0.00%] B40}

0.00%]

100.00%|
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 24-2 Filed 02/20/2004 Page 1 of 24
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 24-2 Filed 02/20/2004 Page 2 of 24
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 24-2 Filed 02/20/2004 Page 3 of 24
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 24-2 Filed 02/20/2004 Page 4 of 24
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 24-2 Filed 02/20/2004 Page 5 of 24
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 24-2 Filed 02/20/2004 Page 6 of 24
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 24-2 Filed 02/20/2004 Page 7 of 24
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 24-2 Filed 02/20/2004 Page 8 of 24
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 24-2 Filed 02/20/2004 Page 9 of 24
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 24-2 Filed 02/20/2004 Page 10 of 24
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 24-2 Filed 02/20/2004 Page 11 of 24
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 24-2 Filed 02/20/2004 Page 12 of 24
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 24-2 Filed 02/20/2004 Page 13 of 24
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 24-2 Filed 02/20/2004 Page 14 of 24
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 24-2 Filed 02/20/2004 Page 15 of 24
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 24-2 Filed 02/20/2004 Page 16 of 24
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 24-2 Filed 02/20/2004 Page 17 of 24
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 24-2 Filed 02/20/2004 Page 18 of 24
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 24-2 Filed 02/20/2004 Page 19 of 24
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 24-2 Filed 02/20/2004 Page 20 of 24
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 24-2 Filed 02/20/2004 Page 21 of 24
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 24-2 Filed 02/20/2004 Page 22 of 24
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 24-2 Filed 02/20/2004 Page 23 of 24
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 24-2 Filed 02/20/2004 Page 24 of 24
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CRIMINAL ACTION

:

v. :

:

CRAIG MASON : No. 04-720-1

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 18th day of September, 2015, upon consideration of the 

Defendant’s Pro Se Motion for a Reduction of Sentence pursuant to 18 U.S. C. §3582(c)(2) and 

Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines (Doc. No. 71), and the Government’s Response

(Doc. No. 73) thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED for the reasons set 

forth in the Government’s Response, namely that because Mr. Mason’s sentence was imposed 

pursuant to and consistent with statutorily mandated minimum sentences and, hence, is not 

subject to any reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3582(c)(2) and/or Sentencing Guidelines 

Amendment 782. See U.S.S.C. Guidelines §1B1.10; Dillon v. United States, 560 U.S. 817, 821 

(2010).

BY THE COURT:

 /s/ Gene E.K. Pratter 

GENE E.K. PRATTER

United States District Judge

Case 2:04-cr-00720-GEKP Document 74 Filed 09/21/15 Page 1 of 1
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 302**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

 

I,Millard S. Drexler, certify that

 

1.             Ihave reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of J. Crew Group, Inc., J.Crew Intermediate LLC and J. Crew Operating Corp.;

 

2.             Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3.             Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial informationincluded in this report fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of each registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4*.            *Each registrant’s othercertifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for such registrant and have:

 

a)             Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to such registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)            Evaluatedthe effectiveness of such registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c)             Disclosedin this report any change in such registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, such registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.             Eachregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to suchregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of such registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)             Allsignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect such registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and

 

b)            Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in such registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 

 
| Dated: October 22, 2004       |
|-------------------------------|
|                          |   |
| /s/ Millard S. Drexler        |   |
| Millard S. Drexler            |
| Chief Executive Officer  |

 

 

----
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the amended annual report of Alnilam Corporation
(the "Company") on Form 10 KSB for the year ended September 30, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), the undersigned principal executive officer and principal
financial officer of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.

Date:  December 23, 2004

/s/ Jason Daggett
Jason Daggett, President and Treasurer
(Principal executive officer
and principal financial officer)
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1207 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1207

 To amend the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 with 
   respect to the application of the Spill Prevention, Control, and 
     Countermeasure rule to certain farms, and for other purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 23, 2017

  Mrs. Fischer (for herself, Mr. Risch, Mr. Boozman, Mr. Wicker, Mrs. 
 Ernst, Mr. Moran, Mr. Sasse, Mr. Hoeven, and Mr. Roberts) introduced 
the following bill; which was read twice and referred to the Committee 
                    on Environment and Public Works

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 2014 with 
   respect to the application of the Spill Prevention, Control, and 
     Countermeasure rule to certain farms, and for other purposes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Farmers Undertake Environmental Land 
Stewardship Act'' or the ``FUELS Act''.

SEC. 2. APPLICABILITY OF SPILL PREVENTION, CONTROL, AND COUNTERMEASURE 
              RULE.

    Section 1049 of the Water Resources Reform and Development Act of 
2014 (33 U.S.C. 1361 note; 128 Stat. 1257; 130 Stat. 1902) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (b)--
                    (A) in paragraph (1)(B), by striking ``20,000'' and 
                inserting ``42,000'';
                    (B) in paragraph (2), by striking subparagraph (A) 
                and inserting the following:
                    ``(A) an aggregate aboveground storage capacity 
                greater than 10,000 gallons but less than 42,000 
                gallons; and'';
                    (C) in paragraph (3)--
                            (i) by striking subparagraph (A) and 
                        inserting the following:
                    ``(A) with an aggregate aboveground storage 
                capacity of less than or equal to 10,000 gallons; 
                and''; and
                            (ii) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``; 
                        and'' and inserting a period; and
                    (D) by striking paragraph (4);
            (2) in subsection (c)(2)(A)--
                    (A) in clause (i), by striking ``1,000'' and 
                inserting ``1,320''; and
                    (B) in clause (ii), by striking ``2,500'' and 
                inserting ``3,000''; and
            (3) by striking subsection (d).
                                 <all>
```
No. 57186.

protest 194620-K (New York).

#### American Express Company *v.*United States,

*390Opinion, by

Johnson, J.

From an examination of the papers in the ease the court was unable to find anything to overcome the presumption of correctness of the collector’s classification. The protest was therefore overruled.