alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

SIMON PIRELA, a/k/a SALVADOR 

MORALES,

Petitioner,

v.

THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE 

COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, et al.,

Respondents.

CIVIL ACTION

NO. 00-5331

ORDER

AND NOW, this 16th day of May 2014, upon consideration of the Second Amended Petition for 

a Writ of Habeas Corpus with accompanying appendices (Doc. No. 36), the Response in 

Opposition with accompanying exhibits (Doc. No. 53), Petitioner’s Reply in further support of 

the Petition (Doc. No. 57), the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate 

Judge Henry S. Perkin (Doc. No. 62), Petitioner’s Objections to the Report and Recommendation 

(Doc. No. 67), the pertinent state court record, and in accordance with the Opinion of the Court 

issued this day, it is ORDERED as follows:

1. The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 62) is 

APPROVED and ADOPTED. 

2. The Second Amended Petition for a Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. No. 36) is 

DENIED.

3. A certificate of appealability will not be issued because, based on the analysis 

contained in the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, as approved 

and adopted by this Court, and based on the analysis contained in the Opinion of 

Case 2:00-cv-05331-JHS Document 69 Filed 05/16/14 Page 1 of 2
2

this Court, dated May 16, 2014, a reasonable jurist could not conclude that the 

Court is incorrect in denying and dismissing the habeas petition.

4. The Clerk of Court shall close this case for statistical purposes.

BY THE COURT: 

/s/ Joel H. Slomsky 

JOEL H. SLOMSKY, J.

Case 2:00-cv-05331-JHS Document 69 Filed 05/16/14 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32(ii)

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the annual report on Form 10-KSB of Dialog Group, Inc.
(the "Company") for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Vincent DeCrescenzo, Sr., the Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, that:

      (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: May 31, 2006

                                                     /s/ Vincent DeCrescenzo
                                                    ----------------------------
                                                    Vincent DeCrescenzo, Sr. CFO
Drone IT 180-5

CHARACTERISTICS

Helicopter drone 

with counter-rotating rotors

17, rue Ampère - 91300 Massy (france)

Tel. : +33 1 60 13 66 00 - Fax : +33 1 60 13 66 10

drone@infotron.fr - www.infotron.fr

IT180-5 TH IT180-5 EL

Motorization 46cm

3 two-stroke Brushless DC

Rotor diameter 1,80 m

Total mass (loaded) 19 Kg 17 Kg

Total mass (unloaded) 14 Kg 14 Kg

Payload 5 Kg 3 Kg

Maximum airspeed 90 Km/h

Maximum altitude 3000 m Endurance 90 minutes 30 minutes

Pilot modes Manual, Automatic, Land monitoring Radio link 41 MHz – 72 MHz - 2,4 GHz

Automatic functions Takeoff, Flight, Landing
 ENVIRONMENT

 Location of pollution sources

 Surveillance of fires

 Protection of coastlines

 INFORMATION AND SERVICES

HD photography and video 

in real-time

 Cartography

 VIDEOSURVEILLANCE

Gyrostabilized or fixed day-night 

video camera

Variable focal length

 On-board video compressor

 Real-time downlink and/or 

on-board storage

Manual or pre-programmed flight

 INDUSTRY

 Site surveillance

Inspection of civil engineering 

structures

Inspection of High Voltage power 

lines

Radiation measurement

 Aeromagnetism

 CIVIL AND MILITARY 

SECURITY

Border control

Guerilla, clandestine laboratories

Triggering of avalanches

Human Search and Rescue

 Identification of ships

Uxo detection

Configurations...

...adapted to 

your assignments

 PERSONALIZED 

CONFIGURATIONS

Adaptation of all types 

of payloads

Support for hardware 

and software integration

Specific developments

 INSPECTION OF CIVIL 

ENGINEERING STRUCTURES 

AND CLIFFS

 High resolution camera

Photography – automatic and/or 

manual shots

Display of visual field in real time

Troubleshooting using software*

(*Partnership with the firm)
```

Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with this annual filing of DNAPrint genomics, Inc., a Utah
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I, Richard
Gabriel, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant toss.906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.ss.1350), that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

/S/ Richard Gabriel
Richard Gabriel
Principal Financial Officer
April 11, 2003
```
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

GENERAL REFRACTORIES COMPANY : CIVIL ACTION 

 :

v. :

 :

FIRST STATE INSURANCE CO., et al. : NO. 04-3509

ORDER

AND NOW, this 11 day of June, 2015, upon consideration of the parties’ respective th

papers and the record, it is hereby ORDERED that “Plaintiff General Refractories Company’s 1

Motion to Preclude Travelers From Arguing That Plaintiff Must Establish Actual Payment Under

the Policies Below Travelers Excess Policies Before Travelers Must Begin to Pay” (doc. no.

648), is DENIED as moot, for the reasons set forth in the Memorandum that accompanies this

Order.

BY THE COURT: 

_s/ L. FelipeRestrepo____________________

L. FELIPE RESTREPO

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Plaintiff’s Motion and Brief (ECF document nos. 647, 648-1); Declaration of Michael Conley, 1

dated May 1, 2015 (doc. no. 657), with Exs. A-K (doc. nos. 657-1 through 657-11); Affidavit of Michael

Conley, dated Apr. 17, 2015 (doc. no. 646), with Exs. 1-8 (doc. nos. 646-1 through 646-8); Affidavit of

Michael Conley, dated Sept. 16, 2011, with Exs. 1 and 2 (doc. no. 364); and Defendant’s Response (doc. no.

653).
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                          16,755
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    3,115
<ALLOWANCES>                                       131
<INVENTORY>                                      1,538
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                21,558
<PP&E>                                           3,611
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,026
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  24,748
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            1,145
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            61
<OTHER-SE>                                      23,603
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    24,748
<SALES>                                          4,077
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 4,133
<CGS>                                            1,742
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,371
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  54
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    708
<INCOME-TAX>                                       171
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                537
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       537
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .12
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .11
        

</TABLE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 23, 2021

No. 04-21-00396-CV

CONTINENTAL HOMES OF TEXAS, L.P. D/B/A EXPRESS HOMES,

Appellant

v.

Giancarlo PEREZ and Krystle Perez,

Appellees

From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2021-CI-10075

Honorable Larry Noll, Judge Presiding

O R D E R

Appellees’ brief in this accelerated appeal was due November 18, 2021. Neither the brief 

nor a motion for extension of time has been filed. We order the brief due December 3, 2021. If 

the brief is not filed by the date ordered, we may submit the case without an appellees’ brief.

_________________________________

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 23rd day of November, 2021.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ, Clerk of Court
Exhibit 32.1
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the quarterly report of Rosedale Decorative Products,
Ltd(the  "Company")  on  Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2005, as
filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"), I, Sidney Ackerman, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  The  Report  fully  complies  with  the  requirements of section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



Date: January 25, 2006                          By: /s/ SIDNEY ACKERMAN
                                                -----------------------
                                                Sidney Ackerman
                                                President
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

GARY TAYLOR : CIVIL ACTION

:

 v. :

:

FRANK D. GILLIS, et al. : NO. 02-4343

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of October, 2002, upon consideration of respondent's

Motion for Enlargement of Time to File Response, it is hereby ORDERED that respondent's

motion is GRANTED. Respondent may file a Response to the Petition for Writ of Habeas

Corpus on or before November 6, 2002. 

BY THE COURT:

 

DIANE M. WELSH

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:02-cv-04343-FVA Document 8 Filed 10/08/2002 Page 1 of 1
# C_2018152EN.01002901.xml

| 30.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 152/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 152/29

---

Judgment of the General Court of 20 March 2018 — Grupo Osborne v EUIPO — Ostermann (DONTORO dog friendship)

(Case T-390/16) (1)

1

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU figurative mark DONTORO dog friendship - Relative ground for refusal - Likelihood of confusion - Complementarity of the goods and services - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)))

(2018/C 152/34)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Grupo Osborne, SA (El Puerto de Santa María, Spain) (represented by: J.M. Iglesias Monravá, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Ivanauskas, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Daniel Ostermann (Leipzig, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 28 April 2016 (Case R 2002/2015-1), relating to opposition proceedings between Grupo Osborne and Mr Ostermann.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Grupo Osborne, SA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Grupo Osborne, SA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 364, 3.10.2016.

1

---
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Wydell Lorraine Dixon v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01-13-00408-CR; 01-13-00409-CR; 01-13-00410-CR; 

01-13-00411-CR

Trial court case number: 12CR0748; 12CR0749; 12CR0750; 12CR0751

Trial court: 56th District Court of Galveston County

This case was abated and remanded to the trial court for the trial court to 

determine whether appellant wishes to prosecute this appeal, to determine whether 

appellant’s counsel had abandoned the appeal, and, if counsel had not abandoned the 

appeal, to inquire of counsel why appellant’s brief has not yet been filed, to determine 

whether counsel’s fee has been paid, and to set a date certain when appellant’s counsel 

must file appellant’s brief. The trial court held a hearing on our abatement order on 

March 6, 2014, and the trial court clerk and court reporter have filed their respective 

records of the hearing. The record reflects that the trial court made all necessary findings 

and then ordered counsel to file a brief on appellant’s behalf by March 27, 2014. 

Accordingly, we REINSTATE this case on the Court’s active docket.

Appellant’s brief is ORDERED to be filed by no later than March 27, 2014. See

TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a), (d). No extensions of time to file appellant’s brief will be 

granted.

Appellee’s brief, if any, is ORDERED to be filed within 30 days of the filing of 

appellant’s brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(b).

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Chief Justice Sherry Radack

  Acting individually  Acting for the Court

Date: March 11, 2014
Exhibit 32.1
 ELECTRO-OPTICAL SCIENCES, INC.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  
 
 
 *
    
    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 has been provided to Electro-Optical Sciences, Inc. and will be retained by
Electro-Optical Sciences, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request. This written statement accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is
not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and will not be incorporated by
reference into any filing of Electro-Optical Sciences, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933
or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, irrespective of any general incorporation language
contained in such filing. 33
# C_2018022EN.01001401.xml

| 22.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/14

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 November 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Administrativen sad Sofia-grad — Bulgaria) — Entertainment Bulgaria System EOOD v Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika’, Sofia

(Case C-507/16) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Taxation - Directive 2006/112/EC - Article 168(a), Article 169(a), Article 214(1)(d) and (e), and Articles 289 and 290 - Deductibility of input value added tax (VAT) due or paid - Output transactions carried out in other Member States - Tax deduction scheme in the Member State in which the right to deduct is exercised))

(2018/C 022/18)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Referring court

Administrativen sad Sofia-grad

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Entertainment Bulgaria System EOOD

Applicant:

Defendant: Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika’, Sofia

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, as amended by Council Directive 2009/162/EU of 22 December 2009, must be interpreted as meaning that it does preclude Member State legislation that prevents a taxable person, established in the territory of that Member State, deducting input value added tax due or paid in that Member State in respect of services provided by taxable persons established in other Member States and used to provide services in Member States other than the Member State in which that taxable person is established, on the ground that that taxable person is identified for value added tax purposes by virtue of one of the two cases referred to in Article 214(1)(d) and (e) of Directive 2006/112, as amended by Directive 2009/162. However, Article 168(a) and Article 169(a) of Directive 2006/112, as amended by Directive 2009/162, must be interpreted as meaning that they do not preclude legislation of a Member State that prevents a taxable person, established in the territory of that Member State and eligible there for a tax deduction scheme, exercising its right to deduct input value added tax due or paid in that Member State for services provided by taxable persons established in other Member States and used to provide services in Member States other than the Member State in which that taxable person is established.

---

(1)  OJ C 441, 28.11.2016.

1

---
```

[Federal Register: November 30, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 229)]
[Notices]               
[Page 74126-74127]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr30no10-146]                         

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 7252]

 
Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition 
Determinations: ``Picasso: Guitars 1912-1914''

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: 
Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 
236-3 of August 28, 2000, I hereby determine that the objects to be 
included in the exhibition ``Picasso: Guitars 1912-1914,'' imported 
from abroad for temporary exhibition within the United States, are of 
cultural significance. The objects are imported pursuant to loan 
agreements with the foreign owners or custodians. I also determine that 
the exhibition or display of the exhibit objects at the Museum of 
Modern Art, New York, NY, from on or about February 13, 2011, until on 
or

[[Page 74127]]

about June 6, 2011, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues 
yet to be determined, is in the national interest. Public Notice of 
these Determinations is ordered to be published in the Federal 
Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For further information, including a 
list of the exhibit objects, contact Carol B. Epstein, Attorney-
Adviser, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State 
(telephone: 202/632-6473). The address is U.S. Department of State, SA-
5, L/PD, Fifth Floor, Washington, DC 20522-0505.

    Dated: November 22, 2010.
Ann Stock,
Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, 
Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2010-30121 Filed 11-29-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
```
# C_2018022EN.01003501.xml

| 22.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/35

---

Judgment of the General Court of 28 November 2017 — Steel Invest & Finance (Luxembourg) v Commission

(Case T-254/16) (1)

1

((State aid - Iron and steel industry - Aid granted by Belgium in favour of several undertakings in the iron and steel industry - Decision declaring the aid incompatible with the internal market and ordering its recovery - Obligation to state reasons - Concept of State aid - Advantage - Private investor test))

(2018/C 022/47)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Steel Invest & Finance (Luxembourg) SA (Strassen, Luxembourg) (represented by: E. van den Broucke, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially, É. Gippini Fournier and K. Herrmann, and, subsequently, É. Gippini Fournier, V. Bottka and G. Luengo, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Re:

Re:

Application pursuant to Article 263 TFEU and seeking partial annulment of Commission Decision (EU) 2016/2041 of 20 January 2016 on State aid SA.33926 2013/C (ex 2013/NN, 2011/CP) granted by Belgium to Duferco (OJ 2016 L 314, p. 22).

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Steel Invest & Finance (Luxembourg) SA to bear its own costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Steel Invest & Finance (Luxembourg) SA to bear its own costs;

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 251, 11.7.2016.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S. C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of RTG Ventures, Inc. (the
"Company") for the annual period ended August 31, 2007 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Linda
Perry, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) of
          15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Dated: December 12, 2007


                                       /s/ Linda Perry
                                           -----------
                                           Linda Perry
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer