alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 2:04-cv-04007-RB Document 11 Filed 06/02/2005 Page 1 of 21
Case 2:04-cv-04007-RB Document 11 Filed 06/02/2005 Page 2 of 21
Case 2:04-cv-04007-RB Document 11 Filed 06/02/2005 Page 3 of 21
Case 2:04-cv-04007-RB Document 11 Filed 06/02/2005 Page 4 of 21
Case 2:04-cv-04007-RB Document 11 Filed 06/02/2005 Page 5 of 21
Case 2:04-cv-04007-RB Document 11 Filed 06/02/2005 Page 6 of 21
Case 2:04-cv-04007-RB Document 11 Filed 06/02/2005 Page 7 of 21
Case 2:04-cv-04007-RB Document 11 Filed 06/02/2005 Page 8 of 21
Case 2:04-cv-04007-RB Document 11 Filed 06/02/2005 Page 9 of 21
Case 2:04-cv-04007-RB Document 11 Filed 06/02/2005 Page 10 of 21
Case 2:04-cv-04007-RB Document 11 Filed 06/02/2005 Page 11 of 21
Case 2:04-cv-04007-RB Document 11 Filed 06/02/2005 Page 12 of 21
Case 2:04-cv-04007-RB Document 11 Filed 06/02/2005 Page 13 of 21
Case 2:04-cv-04007-RB Document 11 Filed 06/02/2005 Page 14 of 21
Case 2:04-cv-04007-RB Document 11 Filed 06/02/2005 Page 15 of 21
Case 2:04-cv-04007-RB Document 11 Filed 06/02/2005 Page 16 of 21
Case 2:04-cv-04007-RB Document 11 Filed 06/02/2005 Page 17 of 21
Case 2:04-cv-04007-RB Document 11 Filed 06/02/2005 Page 18 of 21
Case 2:04-cv-04007-RB Document 11 Filed 06/02/2005 Page 19 of 21
Case 2:04-cv-04007-RB Document 11 Filed 06/02/2005 Page 20 of 21
Case 2:04-cv-04007-RB Document 11 Filed 06/02/2005 Page 21 of 21
Opinion filed May 25, 2017

In The

Eleventh Court of Appeals 

___________

No. 11-17-00083-CR

___________

EX PARTE DECAMREN DESHON SIMS

On Appeal from the 385th District Court

Midland County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CR48745

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant, DeCamren Deshon Sims, has filed a motion to dismiss this appeal. 

In the motion, Appellant requests that we withdraw his notice of appeal and dismiss 

this appeal. The motion is signed by both Appellant and his counsel in accordance 

with TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2.

The motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed. 

PER CURIAM

May 25, 2017

Do not publish. See TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Panel consists of: Wright, C.J.,

Willson, J., and Bailey, J.
# Version

# GT&C Data

# Provided By

# image1.tif
<PAGE>







                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Transition Report of Citizens First Bancorp, Inc., (the
"Company") on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Marshall J. Campbell, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

         (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
         (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the
               Report.


                                   By: /s/ Marshall J. Campbell
                                      ------------------------------------------
                                   Marshall J. Campbell, Chief Executive Officer
                                   Dated: March 27, 2003
Before the Second Division,

February 1, 1946

No. 50869.

#### Protests 226-K, etc., of Marshall Field & Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Ex-99.2 a)


As of and for the year ended December 31, 2001, Cendant Mortgage Corporation
(the Company) has complied in all material respects with the minimum servicing
standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's UNIFORM
SINGLE ATTESTATION PROGRAM FOR MORTGAGE BANKERS. As of and for this same period,
the Company had in effect a fidelity bond and errors and omissions policy in the
amount of $110 million and $20 million, respectively.

Cendant Mortgage Corporation

/s/ Terrence W. Edwards
---------------------------------------
Terrence W. Edwards
President and Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Mark Danahy
---------------------------------------
Mark Danahy
Senior Vice President &
Chief Financial Officer

/s/ Martin L. Foster
---------------------------------------
Martin L. Foster
Senior Vice President - Loan Servicing
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

 

IN RE: IMMODIUM ADVANCED

ANTITRUST LITIGATION

CIVIL ACTION Nos. 

02-4105

02-4149

02-4180

02-4197

02-4362

02-4386

02-4387

02-4476

02-4530

02-6797

02-6993

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 26th day of June, 2003, upon consideration of the attached request

dated June 25, 2003, it is hereby ORDERED that the eleven cases listed above shall be 

consolidated with Civil Action Number 02-4093 and every pleading filed in the consolidated

Immodium Advanced Class Action shall bear the following caption: “In Re: Immodium Advanced

Antitrust Litigation.

BY THE COURT:

 

MARVIN KATZ, S.J.

Case 2:02-cv-04105-MK Document 10 Filed 06/26/2003 Page 1 of 1
Before the Third Division,

January 31, 1952

No. 56333.

protest 174835-K (New York).

#### General Lace Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the Federal Reserve bank certified dual rates of exchange for the currency involved in the liquidation of the entries for the dates of exportation of the merchandise covered by the entries and that the circumstances relating to the liquidation of the said entries are similar in all material respects to those in Abstract 54732. In view of this stipulation and following the cited decision it was held that the currency of the invoices should have been converted in the manner directed by the judgment of this court in said Abstract 54732, in accordance with Bureau of Customs Circular Letter No. 2675, dated October 19, 1949.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATE



As required by 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, (as amended by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley act of 2002), I certify that:



(1)        The Annual Report of RTG Ventures, Inc. for the quarter ending May 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)        The information contained in that Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Linda Perry

Linda Perry

Chief Executive Officer

December 22, 2003
No. 57629.

#### P. John Hanrahan, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 204448-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

From an examination of the papers in this case the court was unable to find anything to overcome the presumption of correctness of the collector’s classification. The protest was therefore overruled.
EXHIBIT 13.1  Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with this Second Amendment to Annual Report for Fiscal 2011 Ended August 31, 2011 of Golden Goliath Resources Ltd., a company organized under the British Columbia Corporations Act(the Company) on Form 20-F as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, J. Paul Sorbara, President and Director of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  /s/ J. Paul Sorbara J. Paul Sorbara, President/Director   Date: August 10, 2012
EXHIBIT 32.2

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of GMX Resources Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |                        
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: March 10, 2011 |  |  |  | /s/ James A. Merrill   
|                     |  |  |  | James A. Merrill       
|                     |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
# C_2016175EN.01000502.xml

| 17.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 175/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 175/5

---

Appeal brought on 29 January 2016 by Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 18 November 2015 in Case T-659/14: Instituto dos Vinhos do Douro e do Porto, IP v OHIM

(Case C-56/16 P)

(2016/C 175/04)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) (represented by: O. Mondéjar Ortuño and E. Zaera Cuadrado, Agents)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Instituto dos Vinhos do Douro e do Porto, IP, Bruichladdich Distillery Co.Ltd

Other parties to the proceedings:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:

| — | uphold the appeal in its entirety; |
| --- | --- |

—

uphold the appeal in its entirety;

| — | annul the judgment under appeal; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the judgment under appeal;

| — | order the applicant before the General Court to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the applicant before the General Court to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The General Court infringed Article 53(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (1), read in conjunction with Article 8(4), and Article 53(2)(d) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 by considering that the protection conferred by Regulation (EC) No 491/2009 (2) to registered designations of origin can be supplemented by Decreto-Lei No 173/2009 and Decreto-Lei No 212/2004 and the Portuguese Intellectual Property Code.

1

2

---

(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 of 26 February 2009 on the Community trade mark OJ L 78, p. 1

1

(2)  Council Regulation (EC) No 491/2009 of 25 May 2009 amending Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007 establishing a common organization of agricultural markets and on specific provisions for certain agricultural products (Single CMO Regulation) OJ L 154, p. 1

2

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-7207

RAYMOND AIGBEKAEN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

HOMEWOOD SUITES BY HILTON; ALAN MANANDAHAR,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. 

James K. Bredar, Chief District Judge. (1:20-cv-02167-JKB)

Submitted: March 26, 2021 Decided: April 2, 2021

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and RICHARDSON, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Raymond Idemudia Aigbekaen, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Raymond Aigbekaen appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint 

as barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994). On appeal, we confine our review 

to the issues raised in the informal brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Aigbekaen’s 

informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, he has 

forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. See Jackson v. Lightsey, 775 F.3d 170, 177 

(4th Cir. 2014) (“The informal brief is an important document; under Fourth Circuit rules, 

our review is limited to issues preserved in that brief.”). Accordingly, we affirm the district 

court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions 

are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
**Exhibit 31.2**
CERTIFICATION
I, Charles P. Huffman, certify that:
1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of EnergySouth, Inc. (the“Registrant”);
2.     Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;
3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theRegistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4.     The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and have:     (a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theRegistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this quarterly report is being prepared;   (b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this quarterly report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterlyreport based on such evaluation; and   (c)     Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in theRegistrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theRegistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annualreport) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely tomaterially affect, the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting;
5.     The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theRegistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
  (a)     All significant deficiencies in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and   (b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves managementor other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.        Date: May 17, 2004          /s/  Charles P. Huffman   Charles P. Huffman   Senior Vice President and
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

RICHARD NIXON, et al. : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. :

:

AMERICAN GENERAL LIFE INS. CO. : NO. 02-4201

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of August, 2002, it is hereby

ORDERED that a settlement conference is scheduled before the

undersigned on Wednesday, October 2, 2002 at 10:00 a.m. in Room

3029, U.S. Courthouse, 601 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA 

19106.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that trial counsel, clients and

any other person necessary to negotiate and agree to a settlement

shall appear in person at said conference. 

ATTEST: or BY THE COURT:

 

BY: Juanita M. Davis DIANE M. WELSH

 Deputy Clerk UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Copy faxed on 8/28/02 to:

Robert E.J. Curran, Esq.

Stephen C. Baker, Esq.

Case 2:02-cv-04201-AB Document 8 Filed 08/29/2002 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA :

: CRIM. NO. 04-491-1

v. :

: CIVIL NO. 08-5475

HAROLD SPURELL :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 23rd day of February , 2012, upon consideration of

Petitioner’s Habeas Corpus Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (ECF No. 42), and all papers

submitted in support thereof and in opposition thereto, it is ORDERED as follows:

1. Petitioner’s Habeas Corpus Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is DENIED.

2. No Certificate of Appealability shall issue. 

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT:

 

R. BARCLAY SURRICK, J.

Case 2:04-cr-00491-RBS Document 49 Filed 02/23/12 Page 1 of 1
November 18, 1958

No. 62459.

Suit 4966.

#### F. S. Whelan & Sons *v.*United States.

C. D. 1982. (Appeal dismissed October 1, 1958.)
No. 62968.

#### Design International Corp. and J. G. Furniture Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 58/14664 and 58/14737 (New York).

Opinion by

Moixison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of chairs similar in all material respects to those the sub*351ject of *Davies Turner & Co.*v. *United States*(45 C.C.P.A. 39, C.A.D. 669), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
**Exhibit 12.1**
**FORM OF 302 CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Heinz Sundt, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Telekom Austria;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under whichsuch statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the companyand have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or causedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to thecompany, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to usby others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) Reserved;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusionsabout the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, asof the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the periodcovered by the annual report that has materially affected, or isreasonable likely to materially affect, the company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and
 5. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, basedon our most recent evaluation of internal control over financialreporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of thecompany’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalentfunctions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in thedesign or operation of internal control over financial reportingwhich are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company’s abilityto record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the company’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.
Date: April 16, 2004        By: /s/ Heinz Sundt  Name: Heinz Sundt
No. 64784.

#### Sprouse-Reitz Co., Inc., and Frank P. Dow Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 306787-K (Portland, Oreg.).

*343Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of sponges similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 61191, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
1

NO. 2012-75468

ASCENTIUM CAPITAL LLC

Plaintiff

v s .

GEU DIAZ CRUZ, INDIVIDUALLY,

FRANK MILLER D/B/A NARS

EQUIPMENT, AND JASON

MILLER D/B/A NARS

EQUIPMENT

Defendants

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

§

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF

HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS

270th JUDICIAL COURT

NOTICE OF APPEAL

TO THE HONORABLE COURT:

Frank Miller, defendant, files this Notice of Appeal, and pursuant to Texas Rules of Appellate

Procedure Rule 25.1(d), would show as follows:

1. The proper trial court, trial court number and style of this case are set forth in the

caption above.

2. Defendant is appealing the interoluctory Judgment in favor of Ascentium Capital, LLC,

plaintiff, that was executed, dated and entered on August 28, 2014. (Exhibit A)

Defendant desires to appeal that Judgment.

3. The appeal is taken to the either the First or Fourteenth Court of Appeals in Houston,

Texas.

4. The name of the party filing this notice is Frank Miller.

4/27/2015 3:26:16 PM

Chris Daniel - District Clerk Harris County

Envelope No. 5048709

By: Phyllis Washington

Filed: 4/27/2015 3:26:16 PM

ACCEPTED

01-15-00405-CV

FIRST COURT OF APPEALS

HOUSTON, TEXAS

5/20/2015 8:21:53 AM

CHRISTOPHER PRINE

CLERK

 FILED IN 1st COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 5/20/2015 8:21:53 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk
2

Respectfully submitted,

THE TRIMBLE FIRM, P.L.L.C.

/s/ Dale L. Trimble

By_______________________________________

Dale L. Trimble

State Bar No. 20222650

209 Simonton Street

Conroe, Texas 77301

Telephone: (936) 539-3457

Telecopier: (936) 539-3464

Email: dlt@trimblefirm.com

Counsel for Defendant, Frank Miller

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This pleading was served in compliance with Rules 21 and 21a of the Texas Rules of Civil

Procedure on the 27th day of April, 2015, upon all counsel of record.

Matthew T. Wright

Wright Law Group, PLLC

12620 FM 1960 Road W.

Suite 4A, Box 304

Houston, Texas 77065

/s/ Dale L. Trimble

__________________________________

Dale L. Trimble
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Annual Report of Watair. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending March 31, 2011, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David Hill, Chief Executive
Officer of Vyre Network (formerly, Watair, Inc.), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                    
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                 | On behalf of: WATAIR, INC.           
|---------------- | -------------------------------------
|January 26, 2024 | /s/ David Hill                       
|                 | Chief Executive Officer, Vyre Network
|                 | (Principal executive).               
|                 |