alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016027EN.01007002.xml

| 25.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 27/70 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 27/70

---

Action brought on 16 November 2015 — Alma-The Soul of Italian Wine v OHIM — Miguel Torres (SOTTO IL SOLE ITALIANO SOTTO il SOLE)

(Case T-637/15)

(2016/C 027/89)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Alma-The Soul of Italian Wine LLLP (Coral Gables, United States of America) (represented by: F. Terrano, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Miguel Torres, SA (Vilafranca del Penedès, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Applicant of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word elements ‘SOTTO IL SOLE ITALIANO SOTTO il SOLE’ — Application for registration No 9 784 539

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before OHIM:

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 September 2015 in Case R 356/2015-2

Contested decision:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Articles 8(5), 64(1) and 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Articles 8(5), 64(1) and 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
ie ta

IPAC Operational Metrics for June 2019

~1,593,512,361.325,

715.65

Perannge oe

|Granc Totat- June 2018 17,416,040,722.017
[June 2038 to June 2019 Change -8,472,872,487,733|

[Percentage Change

“49.5%

Volume by Transaction Type

‘Doliar Amount| $+ of Total Dollar Amount| ‘umber of Transactions] Se of Total Number of Transactions|

Ficuciary (invertment & Borrowing} 3.504,647,124.383 93.53% 24,392 32.13%)
Buy/Sell 32,488,038.833) 0.38%) 103,037} 26.83%]
Benefits (RrTS) 3.818,450,267| 0.07% 526] 0.36%)
Check Aftermath (TRACS] 224,623,182) 0.00%] 725] 0.63%
[Zero Dotter o 0.00%] 3] 0.00%)
Total- june 2019 8,643,168 234 284 100.00% 118,602| 00.00%
|Grenc Totel- May 2015 20,236,680,595,603 100.008 100.00%
# March 2024
No. 53942.

#### Fred L. Cole *v.*United States,

petition 6737-R (Galveston).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

From the testimony it appeared that the advance in value and penalties incurred by the petitioner were brought about by an honest misunderstanding on his part. It was held that the entry of the merchandise at a less value than that found by the appraiser was without any intent to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the ease or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore granted.
Before the Third Division,

November 24, 1958

No. 62463.

#### B. Spiliadis & Company et al. *v.*United States,

protests 172088-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of olives in brine similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Moscahlades Bros., Inc.*v. *United States*(39 Cust. Ct. 127, C. D. 1917), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 66234.

#### Pez Haas, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 60/18542, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of Pez candy dispensers the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 65026, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# C_2019139EN.01000901.xml

| 15.4.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 139/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.4.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 139/9

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 28 February 2019 — Council of the European Union v Marquis Energy LLC, European Commission, ePURE, de Europese Producenten Unie van Hernieuwbare Ethanol

(Case C-466/16 P) (1)

(Appeal - Dumping - Implementing Regulation (EU) No 157/2013 - Imports of bioethanol originating in the United States of America - Definitive anti-dumping duty - Country-wide dumping margin - Actions for annulment - Non-exporting producer - Locus standi - Direct concern)

(2019/C 139/06)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Council of the European Union (represented by: S. Boelaert, Agent, and N. Tuominen, avocată)

Other parties to the proceedings: Marquis Energy LLC (represented by: P. Vander Schueren, advocaat, and N. Mizulin and M. Peristeraki, avocats), European Commission (represented by: T. Maxian Rusche and M. França, Agents), ePURE, de Europese Producenten Unie van Hernieuwbare Ethanol (represented by: O. Prost and A. Massot, avocats)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 9 June 2016, Marquis Energy v Council (T-277/13, not published, EU:T:2016:343); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 9 June 2016, Marquis Energy v Council (T-277/13, not published, EU:T:2016:343);

| 2. | Dismisses the action for annulment brought by Marquis Energy LLC as inadmissible; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Dismisses the action for annulment brought by Marquis Energy LLC as inadmissible;

| 3. | Orders Marquis Energy LLC to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union both in relation to the proceedings at first instance and the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders Marquis Energy LLC to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Council of the European Union both in relation to the proceedings at first instance and the appeal;

| 4. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs both in the proceedings at first instance and on appeal. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs both in the proceedings at first instance and on appeal.

---

(1)  OJ C 402, 31.10.2016.

---
# C_2017424EN.01001601.xml

| 11.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 424/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 424/16

---

Order of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 10 October 2017 — Greenpeace Energy eG v European Commission

(Case C-640/16 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - State aid - Action for annulment - Article 263 TFEU - Admissibility - Aid planned by the United Kingdom in favour of Hinkley Point C nuclear power station - Decision declaring the aid compatible with the internal market - Locus standi - Appellant not individually concerned))

(2017/C 424/22)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Greenpeace Energy eG (represented by: D. Fouquet, J. Nysten and S. Michaels, Rechtsanwälte)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: K. Blanck-Putz, P. Němečková and T. Maxian Rusche, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Interveners in support of the Commission: French Republic (represented by: D. Colas and J. Bousin, acting as Agents), United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented by: D. Robertson, acting as Agent)

Interveners in support of the Commission:

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | Greenpeace Energy eG shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Greenpeace Energy eG shall bear its own costs and pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 38, 6.2.2017.

1

---
IPAC QUERY TROUBLESHOOTING

Downloading reports into .csv file format

We are aware of an issue in which some IPAC users are experiencing a ‘Certificate Error Message’ when opening an IPAC 

Query (e.g. IPAC Transaction Report Download) into a .csv file format. The error message is associated with a recent 

security change implemented during the Treasury Web Application Infrastructure (TWAI) IHS upgrade. Some users may 

experience intermittent issues depending on their agency’s local Microsoft Office Excel settings.

The steps below should allow IPAC users to review .csv reports as needed. 

1. After selecting the ‘Download’ button in the application, select ‘Save as’ in the prompt

2. Designate a location to save the file (re-name if desired)

3. Select ‘Open’

Please contact the Treasury Support Center with additional questions. They may be reached at: 

IPAC@stls.frb.org , or by calling 877-440-9476.
**Exhibit 23.1****Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm**We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form S-8 forthe Citizens First Bancorp, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan(Registration No. 333-149470), Citizens First Savings Bank 401 (K) Plan (Registration No. 333-74218), Citizens FirstBancorp, Inc. 2001 Stock-Based Incentive Plan (Registration No. 333-98199) and Citizens FirstBancorp, Inc. Management Restricted Stock Purchase Plan (Registration Nos. 333-100516 and333-122417) and in the Registration Statement on Form S-3 for the Citizens First Bancorp, Inc.Dividend Reinvestment and Optional Cash Purchase Plan (Registration No. 333-115896) of our reportsdated March 17, 2008 relating to the consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness ofCitizens First Bancorp, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting, which appear in this Form10-K.
Case No. 14,981.

#### UNITED STATES v. DOMINGO.

[See Case No. 16,032.]
Case 2:04-cv-01235-LS Document 86 Filed 10/04/05 Page 1 of 11
Case 2:04-cv-01235-LS Document 86 Filed 10/04/05 Page 2 of 11
Case 2:04-cv-01235-LS Document 86 Filed 10/04/05 Page 3 of 11
Case 2:04-cv-01235-LS Document 86 Filed 10/04/05 Page 4 of 11
Case 2:04-cv-01235-LS Document 86 Filed 10/04/05 Page 5 of 11
Case 2:04-cv-01235-LS Document 86 Filed 10/04/05 Page 6 of 11
Case 2:04-cv-01235-LS Document 86 Filed 10/04/05 Page 7 of 11
Case 2:04-cv-01235-LS Document 86 Filed 10/04/05 Page 8 of 11
Case 2:04-cv-01235-LS Document 86 Filed 10/04/05 Page 9 of 11
Case 2:04-cv-01235-LS Document 86 Filed 10/04/05 Page 10 of 11
Case 2:04-cv-01235-LS Document 86 Filed 10/04/05 Page 11 of 11
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access to publicationsin the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging and locatorservices, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications (CGP). Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event that publicationsare no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****Studies by the U.S. GeologicalSurvey in Alaska**
 
2000 | 2001 | 2004 | 2005| 2007 | 2008-09| 2010 | 2011 | 2019
 
SuDoc Number:I 19.4/8:
Item Number:0620-A (online)
CGP systemNumber:000560396
 
December 10, 2019
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P. (the Registrant) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report),
the undersigned, Leo F. Wells, III, Chief Executive Officer of the corporate general partner of the Registrant, and Douglas P. Williams, Chief Financial Officer of the corporate general partner of the Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                            
|------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                            
|/S/    LEO F. WELLS,
III                                    
|Leo F. Wells, III Principal Executive Officer
March 27, 2007



|                                                              
|--------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                              
|/S/    DOUGLAS P.
WILLIAMS                                    
|Douglas P. Williams Principal Financial
Officer March 27, 2007
<PAGE>   1
                                   EXHIBIT 99

                        REPORT OF PREDECESSOR ACCOUNTANT
                             ON FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


Board of Directors
First Federal Savings and Loan Association
Alpena, Michigan


We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial condition
of FIRST FEDERAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION and subsidiary as of December 31,
1999, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity
and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 1999.
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Association's
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting
the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of FIRST FEDERAL
SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION and subsidiary at December 31, 1999, and the
results of their operations and cash flows for each of the two years in the
period ended December 31, 1999, in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles.


/s/ Straley, Ilsley & Lamp P.C.
----------------------------------
February 14, 2000
Alpena, Michigan
























                                       30
Before the First Division

May 28, 1963

No. 67773.

#### Quon Quon Company et al. *v.*United States,

protests 222777-K, etc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “K” consist of rattaneore kleenex box covers the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Quon Quon Company*v. *United States*(41 Cust. Ct. 178, C.D. 2038) and the items marked “W” consist of trays, etc., not in part of rattan, similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 66729, the claim at 16% percent ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 412, as modified by the Annecy Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 52373), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T.D. 52476), for manufactures of wood, not specially provided for, was sustained. The items marked “F,” stipulated to consist of rattaneore flower cages the same as those the subject of *Quon Quon Company*v. *United States*(41 Cust. Ct. 181, C.D. 2039) and the items marked “R” or “B,” stipulated to consist of trays in part of rattan or bamboo similar to those the subject of said Abstract 66729, were held dutiable at 45 percent under paragraph 409 as articles, wholly or partly manufactured of rattan, or at 25 percent under the provision in said paragraph, as modified by the Japanese Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 53865), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T.D. 53877). The items marked “T,” stipulated to consist of rattaneore tabletops the same as those the subject of *United States*v. *Quon Quon Company*(46 CCPA 70, C.A.D. 699), were held dutiable at the appropriate rate, depending upon the date of entry, under the provision in paragraph 412, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 51802) or by the Sixth Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 54108), for parts of furniture; certain items marked “H,” stipulated not to consist of 'baskets but of rattan hats, were held dutiable at 12% percent under the provision in paragraph 1504(b) (1), as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 52739), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T.D. 52857), for hats, wholly or in chief value of rattan, not bleached, dyed, colored, or stained; and the items marked “M,” stipulated to consist of aluminum household holloware *317baskets, were held dutiable at 3% cents per pound and 17 percent ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 339, as modified by T.D. 54108, for household utensils, composed wholly or in chief value of aluminum, as claimed.
Case No. 7,807.

#### KING v. THOMPSON et al.

[3 Cranch, C. C. 146.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

May Term, 1827.

Negotiable Instruments — Giving Time to Maker after Judgment — Whether Discharge op Indorser.

If the creditor, after judgment against the maker and indorser of a promissory note, give time to the maker, he does not thereby discharge the indorser.

[This was a bill in equity by Charles Ring, for the heirs of George King, against Thompson and others.] Exception was taken to the auditor’s report, in which a claim of the Bank of Columbia against an indorser was rejected, because the bank had given time to the makers of the note, after judgment against the indorser.

J. Dunlop cited Bay v. Tallmadge, 5 Johns. Ch. 315, to show that, by the judgment, the relation of principal and surety had ceased, and that indulgence to one was no discharge of the other.

C. Cox, contrá,

contended that any indulgence by which the creditor gave time to the principal, and thereby prevented the surety from immediate recourse to his principal, in case of payment by the surety, discharges the latter. Pell, Guaranty, p. 217, c. 17. By Act Md. 1763, c. 23, § 8, the surety discharging or satisfying a judgment against the principal is entitled to an immediate assignment of the judgment against the principal, and may have instant execution thereupon. Indulgence to the principal would be in direct hostility to this right.

1

 [Reported by Hon. William Cranch, Chief Judge.]

THE COURT

was of opinion that the in-dorser was not discharged, and sustained the exception to the report In the case of Bay v. Tallmadge, 5 Johns. Ch. 315, Chancellor Kent says: “1 am not aware of any case that has ever imposed upon the creditor the necessity of peculiar diligence against the principal, on the ground of the still existing rela*554tion of principal and surety, after judgment and execution against the bail or the surety. It becomes too late, then, to inquire into the antecedent relations between the parties. Those relations become merged in the judgment. This was expressly declared to be the case, as between the holder and maker and indorser of a promissory note, by the supreme court of the United States, in Lenox v. Prout, 3 Wheat. [16 U. S.] 520.” See, also. Id. 157, in notes; Fulton v. Matthews, 15 Johns. 433; Shubrick’s Ex’rs v. Russell. 1 Desaus. Eq. 315; Pain v. Packard, 13 Johns. 174; Rutledge v. Greenwood, 2 Desaus. Eq. 339; Commissioners of Berks Co. v. Ross, 3 Bin. 520; Trimble v. Thorne, 16 Johns. 152.

ICING (THOMPSON v.). See Cases Nos. 13,-902 and 13,963.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED 
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Duska Therapeutics, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Wayne Lorgus, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                        | 
|----------------------- | 
|/s/ WAYNE LORGUS        | 
|Wayne Lorgus            | 
|Chief Financial Officer | 



March 17, 2008
:SP~A - J..() 1/ - 0 035

Contacts. With whom outside the FAA has this proposal been discussed? ,

Organization Person Contacted Date Response

i\':lliollll! Business Aircraft Association [Ii Cotli 412712010 -

Rl'gional Airline As..••ociatioll Dave Lottercr 4/27/2010

Aircraft Owners & Pilots Association Robert Hackman 4/27/2010 -

A"fA ;\,] Lopez

I

4/27/2010

(Jf-x Ii?,~kV.,.n"" '>MIO - )
Exhibit 99.2



                            CERTIFICATION
                 PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
            SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



     In  connection with the annual report of Health Sciences Group,
Inc.  (the  "Company")  on Form 10-KSB for  the  fiscal  year  ended
December  31,  2002  as  filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission  on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Fred  E.  Tannous,
Chief  Financial  Officer, certify, pursuant to  18  U.S.C.  Section
1350,  as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act
of 2002, that:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
          13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information contained in the Report fairly  presents,
          in  all  material  respects, the financial  condition  and
          results of operations of the Company.


                                   HEALTH SCIENCES GROUP, INC.

          June 10, 2003        By:  /s/ Fred E. Tannous
                                  ---------------------------
                                   Fred E. Tannous
                                   Chief Executive Officer,
                                   Chief Financial Officer,
                                   (Principal Financial Officer),
                                   and Co-chairman
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-13-00004-CV

BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.

v.

DWIGHT EISENHAUER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS INDEPENDENT EXECUTOR OF 

THE ESTATE OF LORENE BELCHER WALTER, DECEASED

On Appeal from the

County Court at Law No. 1 of Nueces County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 05-61652-1

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. The Court 

orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED. Costs of the appeal are adjudged 

against appellant.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

May 15, 2014