alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATIONS

I, Kenneth Levy, President, principal executive officer and principal financial
officer, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-KSB of United Network
     Marketing Services, Inc.;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
     statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
     make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
     statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
     this annual report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
     information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material
     respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
     the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I am responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a)   designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
          material information relating to the registrant, including its
          consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those
          entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report
          is being prepared;

     b)   evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
          and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
          this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

     c)   presented in this annual report my conclusions about the effectiveness
          of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as
          of the Evaluation Date;

5.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
     committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
     equivalent functions):

     a)   all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
          controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to
          record, process, summarize and report financial data and have
          identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in
          internal controls; and

     b)   any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
          employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
          controls; and

6.   The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
     annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal
     controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal
     controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including
     any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material
     weaknesses.

Date:  March 22, 2004


By: /s/ Kenneth Levy
Kenneth Levy, President, Principal Executive Officer and
Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
(V. D. 32)

Entry Nos. 747204; 790103.

#### Abercrombie & Fitch Co. et al. *v.*United States

(Decided September 19, 1956)

*Tompkins & Tompkins (Allerton deC. Tompkins*of counsel) for the plaintiffs.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

These matters are presently before me on remands from classification proceedings decided by the first division of this court in *Abercrombie & Fitch Co.*v. *United States,*34 Cust. Ct. 249, Abstract 58648; *Getz Bros. Co., Inc.*v. *United States,*33 Cust. Ct. 472, Abstract 58615. The judgments entered therein stated: “* * * that the matter be remanded to a single judge in reappraisement pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d).”

The matters have been submitted for decision upon an agreed statement of facts entered into by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto.

Upon the agreed facts, I find the foreign value, as that value is defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by section 8 of the Customs Administrative Act of 1938 (19 U..S. C. § 1402 (c)), to be the proper basis for determining the values of the involved merchandise and that such values were as follows, net packed:

> Protest Entry Merchandise Price — each

> 229560-K/l7485-[53] 747204 113 pcs. binoculars 8 x 30 with leather cases:

> binoculars_ 68. (*) German marks

> leather cases_ 8.25 (*) German marks

> (*) less 2% cash discount, and plus 4% tax.

> 228370-K/l5083-[53] 790103 100 pcs. prismatic binoculars with pigskin cases:

> binoculars_ $12.75 ü. S.

> pigskin cases_ $1.25 U. S.

> 25 pcs. prismatic binoculars with cowhide cases:

> binoculars_ $12.75 IT. S.

> cowhide cases_ $1.50 U. S.

*452I further find such values to be the dutiable values of said merchandise.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> USD

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                          38,718
<SECURITIES>                                     6,130
<RECEIVABLES>                                    7,122
<ALLOWANCES>                                     (102)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                70,532
<PP&E>                                          11,587
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,414
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  80,918
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,058
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            35
<OTHER-SE>                                      57,636
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    80,918
<SALES>                                         58,534
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                58,534
<CGS>                                           19,950
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   19,950
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                32,783
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 250
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,375
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,454
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,921
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,921
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .12


</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 32.1

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection  with Amendment No. 1 to the Quarterly  Report of Integrated
Healthcare  Holdings,  Inc.  (the  "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2004, as filed with the  Securities and Exchange  Commission  (the
"Report"),  the  undersigned,  in the capacity and on the date indicated  below,
hereby  certifies  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    the Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company at the dates and for the period indicated.

      This  Certificate has not been, and shall not be deemed,  "filed" with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.


      Dated: April 6, 2006              By: /s/ Bruce Mogel
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Bruce Mogel
                                            Chief Executive Officer
No. 61759.

#### C. J. Tower & Sons *v.*United States,

protests 224839-K, etc. (Buffalo).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of yellow cedar the same in all material respects as that the subject of *Border Brokerage Co. et al.*v. *United States*(39 Cust. Ct. 179, C. D. 1923), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 10.11
​
Axcelis Technologies, Inc.
Named Executive Officer Base Compensation at February 26, 2021
 
This Exhibit discloses the current understandings with respect to base compensation between Axcelis Technologies, Inc. (the “Company”) and each of:
 
●                  the Company’s principal executive officer (Mary G. Puma),
 
●                  the Company’s principal financial officer (Kevin J. Brewer), and
 
●                  the three most highly compensated other executive officers serving as executive officers at December 31, 2020.
 
These executive officers are referred to herein as “named executive officers” or “NEOs.”
 
Mary G. Puma and the Company have entered into a written agreement addressing a minimum level of base salary due to the executive. The Company’s Amended and Restated Employment Agreement with Ms. Puma (“Puma Employment Agreement”) is listed as an Exhibit to this Form 10-K.  Each of the other NEOs and the Company have entered into an Executive Separation Pay Agreement in which a termination without cause will entitle the executive to one year of separation pay.  The form of Executive Separation Pay Agreement is listed as an Exhibit to this Form 10-K.
 
The Company maintains that all executive officers, other than Ms. Puma, are employees at will and that the Company has no obligation to continue their employment, other in cases where such obligation arises under the Change of Control Agreements described in our Proxy Statement and filed as an Exhibit to this Form 10-K.
 
Rate of Base Pay
 
In the course of the employment relationship with each NEO, the Company communicates to the named executive officer the amount of base salary approved by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, which compensation is subject to change in the discretion of the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (provided Ms. Puma’s employment agreement sets a minimum base pay amount). The following table sets forth the annual base salary as communicated to the named executive officers of the Company as in effect on February 26, 2021:
 
	

	

	

	

	

	

	


	Named Executive Officer
	 
	Title
	 
	Rate of Annual
Base Pay
	 

	Mary G. Puma 
	 
	President and Chief Executive Officer
	 
	$
	615,000
	 

	Kevin J. Brewer 
	 
	Executive VP and Chief Financial Officer
	 
	$
	392,000
	 

	Russell J. Low
	 
	Executive VP, Global Customer and Engineering Operations
	 
	$
	360,000
	 

	William Bintz 
	 
	Executive VP, Engineering and Marketing
	 
	$
	330,000
	 

	Lynnette C. Fallon 
	 
	Executive VP, HR/Legal and General Counsel
	 
	$
	326,000
	 



​
EXHIBIT 99.6

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS

We
hereby consent to the use of our name in the Annual Report on Form 40-F (the "Annual Report") of Enerplus Corporation (the "Registrant"). We hereby further consent
to the inclusion in the Annual Report of the Registrant's Annual Information Form dated February 22, 2013 for the year ended December 31, 2012 which document makes reference to our firm
and our report dated January 25, 2013 evaluating the Registrant's oil, natural gas, natural gas liquids and shale gas interests effective December 31, 2012.

Dallas, Texas, U.S.A.
February 22, 2013

HAAS PETROLEUM ENGINEERING SERVICES, INC./s/ J. THADDEUS TOUPS J. Thaddeus Toups, P.E.
Associate Director of Engineering


---



QuickLinks
# C_2018032EN.01000301.xml

| 29.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 32/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 29 November 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale ordinario di Torino — Italy) — VCAST Limited v R.T.I. SpA

(Case C-265/16) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Approximation of laws - Copyright and related rights - Directive 2001/29/EC - Article 5(2)(b) - Private copying exception - Article 3(1) - Communication to the public - Specific technical means - Provision of a cloud computing service for the remote video recording of copies of works protected by copyright, without the consent of the author concerned - Active involvement of the service provider in the recording))

(2018/C 032/03)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunale ordinario di Torino

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: VCAST Limited

Applicant:

Defendant: R.T.I. SpA

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society, in particular Article 5(2)(b) thereof, must be interpreted as precluding national legislation which permits a commercial undertaking to provide private individuals with a cloud service for the remote recording of private copies of works protected by copyright, by means of a computer system, by actively involving itself in the recording, without the rightholder’s consent.

---

(1)  OJ C 270, 25.7.2016.

1

---
No. 66253.

#### Richter Bros., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 61/2967 and 61/4184 (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of bread similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. *Nordic Baking & Importing Co., Inc.*(47 C.C.P.A. 78, C.A.D. 733), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# C_2016279EN.01001901.xml

| 1.8.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 279/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.8.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 279/19

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 20 May 2016 — Vereniging Hoekschewaards Landschap v Staatssecretaris van Economische Zaken

(Case C-281/16)

(2016/C 279/26)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Raad van State

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Vereniging Hoekschewaards Landschap

Applicant:

Defendant: Staatssecretaris van Economische Zaken

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Is the Commission Implementing Decision of 3 December 2014 adopting an eighth update of the list of sites of Community importance for the Atlantic biogeographical region, (1) in so far as the ‘Haringvliet’ site (NL 1000015) was thereby placed on that list without the inclusion of the Leenheerenpolder, valid?

1

---

(1)  OJ 2015 L 18, p. 385.

1

---
CERTIFICATION





I, Robert W. OBrien, Secretary/Treasurer, Director, Chief Executive Officer, and Principal Financial Officer certify that:



1.

This annual report on Form 10-KSB/A of Gold Bond Resources, Inc. fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and;



2.

The information contained in this annual report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Gold Bond Resources, Inc.



Date: December 13, 2002



/s/ Robert W. O'Brien



Robert W. O'Brien

Secretary/Treasurer, Director, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
© 2024 Google LLC
No. 61267.

protests 259612-K, etc. (New York).

#### Richter Bros., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of fried herring similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Richter Bros., Inc.*v. *United States*(44 C. C. P. A. 128, C. A. D. 649), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Bulletin No. 2023-01

Retention: December 31, 2023

To: Heads of Government Departments, Agencies and Others 

Concerned

Subject: Current Value of Funds Rate (CVFR)

1. Purpose

The Secretary of the Treasury is responsible for computing and publishing the 

rate that is used for Federal debt collection, cash discounts, and rebate 

evaluation. The Current Value of Funds Rate (CVFR) is a percentage based 

on the current value of funds to the Department of the Treasury (Treasury).

2. Background

The CVFR reflects the Current Value of Funds to the Treasury for use in 

connection with Federal Cash Management systems and is based on 

investment rates set for purposes of Public Law 95-147, 91 Stat. 1227 

(October 28, 1977). The annual Interest Rate Factors used in determining the 

CVFR are based on weekly average of the Effective Federal Funds Rate 

(EFFR), less 25 basis points, for the 12-month period ending every 

September 30. The Treasury Office of Debt Management began providing the 

annual Interest Rate Factors in the October 2021 monthly reporting cycle. The 

CVFR is rounded to the nearest whole percentage and becomes effective 

each January 1. Treasury's Bureau of the Fiscal Service publishes the 

presiding rate annually in the Federal Register and in a TFM bulletin, or if the 

annual average (on a 12-month moving average basis) changes by at least 2 

percent per quarter.

Current and previous rates can be obtained from the CVFR website.

3. Percentage Rate Used When Assessing Interest Charges on 

Outstanding Debts Owed to the Government, Evaluating the CostEffectiveness of Cash Discounts, and Considering Payment Dates for 

Purchase Card Invoices

The CVFR percentage for the period January 1, 2023, through December 31, 

2023, is 1 percent. This rate reflects the average investment rates for the 12-

month period ending September 30, 2022.
4. Application

Federal agencies are to apply the CVFR percentage when:

• Assessing interest charges for outstanding debts owed the Government 

(See 31 U.S.C. § 3717), or

• Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of a cash discount, see the Prompt 

Payment website, or 

• Considering the date to pay purchase card invoices if a rebate is offered 

by the card issuer. (See 5 CFR Part 1315.8). The Prompt Payment 

website provides a calculator that automatically calculates the net 

savings to the Government, enabling the agency to determine whether it 

should pay the invoice early or on the Prompt Payment due date.

5. Rescission

This bulletin will rescind TFM Volume I, Bulletin No. 2022-05.

6. Effective Date

This bulletin is effective on January 1, 2023.

7. Inquiries

Department of the Treasury

Bureau of the Fiscal Service

Disbursing and Debt Management

E-Commerce Division (LC-RM 349B)

3201 Pennsy Drive, Building E

Landover, MD 20785

(Telephone 202-874-9428)

Date: December 13, 2022
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 10-3 Filed 08/05/2002 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 10-3 Filed 08/05/2002 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 10-3 Filed 08/05/2002 Page 3 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

HEALY : CIVIL ACTION

:

 :

 v. :

:

 : 

BOROUGH OF EDDYSTONE : NO. 02-4329

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 26th day of August, 2002, in accordance with the court's

procedure for random reassignment of cases, it is hereby

ORDERED that the above-captioned case is reassigned from the calendar of

the Honorable Herbert J. Hutton to the calendar of the Honorable Michael M. Baylson.

 FOR THE COURT:

 JAMES T. GILES 

 Chief Judge

 ATTEST:

 ___________________

 MICHAEL E. KUNZ

 Clerk of Court

Case 2:02-cv-04329-MMB Document 2 Filed 08/26/2002 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 13.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18
U.S.C.


SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF
THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Amendment No. 1 to the Annual Report on Form
20-F/A ofIRSA Propiedades Comerciales S.A.
(the “Company”) for the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2019, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
“Report”), Matías I. Gaivironsky, as Chief
Financial and Administrative Officer of the Company, hereby
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15
(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.





IRSA Propiedades Comerciales S.A.January 06, 2020
By:
/s/ Matias
I. GaivironskyMatias
I. GaivironskyChief
Financial and Administrative Officer





This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except as to the
extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed
by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

EDMUND V. LUDWIG 12614 United States Courthouse

 Judge Independence Mall West

 Philadelphia, PA 19106-1775

(215) 580-2030

(215) 580-2142 FAX

DENNIS E. BLOCK 

KENNETH S. BUTENSKY 

COLETTE A. PETE 

JOHN O.J. SHELLENBERGER 

DAVID F. WHITE 

ROBERT C. MICKLE 

CHRISTOPHER H. WRIGHT 

ERIC J. RISO

AMENDED NOTICE OF SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

(TIME CHANGE)

RE: OAKES v. HENKELS & MCCOY, et al.

CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-2749

Judge Ludwig has scheduled a Rule 16 conference for your case or cases on

Tuesday, July 30, 2002 at 2:30 P.M. (Changed from 11:00 a.m. ) in chambers, Room 12614.

Counsel for plaintiff is required to notify unrepresented defendant(s) as to

the date and time of the conference by serving a copy of this notice (with attachments) upon

defendant(s) or their counsel, if known.

If service of process has not been made, it is also the responsibility of plaintiff's

counsel to take all steps reasonably necessary to expedite service as required by Fed. R. Civ. P.

4(a).

Very truly yours,

Kathryne M. Crispell

Deputy Clerk to Judge Ludwig

DATE: July 23, 2002

Case 2:02-cv-02749-EL Document 19 Filed 07/23/2002 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

 

RICHARD BRIDGE and ELLEN

BRIDGE,

 Plaintiffs,

 v.

BAYER CORPORATION, et al.,

 Defendants.

 

CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-4240

 

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 1st day of July, 2002, the court having been previously advised

that the above action cannot proceed to trial and disposition because of the following reason:

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending disposition of a related action.

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending determination of arbitration

proceedings.

[ ] - Interlocutory appeal filed 

[X] - Other: Cases are placed into suspense pending receipt of the Case Transfer

Order from the Judicial Panel on Multi District Litigation transferring

cases to District of Minnesota. 

it is

ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall mark this action closed for statistical purposes

and place the matter in the Civil Suspense File, and it is 

FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction; and that the case be

restored to the trial docket when the action is in a status so that it may proceed to final 

Case 2:02-cv-04240-MK Document 2 Filed 07/01/2002 Page 1 of 2
disposition; this order shall not prejudice the rights of the parties to this litigation.

BY THE COURT:

______________________________

MARVIN KATZ, S.J.

Case 2:02-cv-04240-MK Document 2 Filed 07/01/2002 Page 2 of 2