alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017022EN.01000901.xml

| 23.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/9

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Supremo (Spain) lodged on 28 October 2016 — Gasorba, S.L., Josefa Rico Gil and Antonio Ferrándiz González v Repsol Comercial de Productos Petrolíferos, S.A.

(Case C-547/16)

(2017/C 022/13)

Language of the case: Spanish

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal Supremo

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Gasorba, S.L., Josefa Rico Gil and Antonio Ferrándiz González

Applicants:

Defendant: Repsol Comercial de Productos Petrolíferos, S.A.

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Under Article 16 (‘Uniform application of Community competition law’) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 (1) of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty, does Commission Decision (2) of 12 April 2006 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 81 of the EC Treaty (Case COMP/B-1/38.348 — Repsol C.P.P.) preclude a national court from declaring that the agreements to which that decision applies are invalid on account of the duration of the exclusive supply period, even though they may be declared invalid for other reasons such as, for example, the imposition of a minimum retail price by the supplier on the buyer (or reseller)? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Under Article 16 (‘Uniform application of Community competition law’) of Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2003 (1) of 16 December 2002 on the implementation of the rules on competition laid down in Articles 81 and 82 of the Treaty, does Commission Decision (2) of 12 April 2006 relating to a proceeding pursuant to Article 81 of the EC Treaty (Case COMP/B-1/38.348 — Repsol C.P.P.) preclude a national court from declaring that the agreements to which that decision applies are invalid on account of the duration of the exclusive supply period, even though they may be declared invalid for other reasons such as, for example, the imposition of a minimum retail price by the supplier on the buyer (or reseller)?

1

2

| 2. | If so, are long-term contracts to which the Commitment Decision applies to be regarded as benefiting from an individual exemption, under Article 101(3) TFEU, as a consequence of that decision? |
| --- | --- |

2.

If so, are long-term contracts to which the Commitment Decision applies to be regarded as benefiting from an individual exemption, under Article 101(3) TFEU, as a consequence of that decision?

---

(1)  OJ 2003 L 1, p. 1.

1

(2)  OJ 2006 L 176, p. 104.

2

---
---

CERTIFICATIONS

The undersigned, Ross J. Tocher, hereby certifies, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

|(1) | the annual report on Form 20-F/A of Qwick Media Inc.
      (formerly Tuscany Minerals Ltd.) for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the
      Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Qwick Media Inc.                                                                                                  

Dated: January 7, 2011

| | /s/
      Ross J. Tocher             
| | -------------------------------------
| | Ross J. Tocher                       
| | President and Chief Executive Officer
| | (Principal Executive Officer)        

A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Qwick Media Inc.
and will be retained by Qwick Media Inc. and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
No. 58888.

protests 192319-K and 206258-K (Philadelphia).

#### Alex. Murphy & Company and Keer, Maurer Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of sheepskin flicks the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 57959, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
1Defendant’s Motion attaches the administrative charge of discrimination that Plaintiff

filed with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. In reviewing the merits of a motion

to dismiss, we may consider a plaintiff’s administrative charge, even though it is not attached to

the complaint, without converting the motion into one for summary judgment. See Pryor v. Nat’l

Collegiate Athletic Ass’n, 288 F.3d 548, 560 (3d Cir. 2002); Mullen v. Topper’s Salon & Health

Spa, Inc., 99 F. Supp. 2d 553, 555 n.1 (E.D. Pa. 2000). Plaintiff’s Complaint and her charge of

discrimination, which is referred to in Plaintiff’s Complaint and is central to her claim, satisfy the

requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8. Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2) (A pleading shall

contain “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief . . .

.”). Moreover, we note that much of the case law on which Defendant relies to support its

argument arose in the context of summary judgment and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56,

after discovery. See Knabe v. Boury Corp., 114 F.3d 407, 408 (3d Cir. 1997) (affirming district

court’s grant of summary judgment to defendant); EEOC v. Rose Casual Dining Corp., L.P., Civ.

A. No. 02-7485, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 4335, at *2 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 5, 2004) (denying

defendants’ motion for summary judgment); Seldomridge v. Uni-Marts, Inc., Civ. A. No. 99-496,

2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9491, at *2 (D. Del. July 10, 2001) (granting defendant’s motion for

summary judgment); Bonora v. UGI Utils., Inc., Civ. A. No. 99-5539, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS

15172, at *1 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 18, 2000) (granting in part and denying in part defendant’s motion for

summary judgment); Bauder v. Wackenhut Corp., Civ. A. No. 99-1232, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS

4044, at *1 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 23, 2000) (granting defendant’s motion for summary judgment);

Bishop v. Nat’l R.R. Passenger Corp., 66 F. Supp. 2d 650, 669 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 7, 1999) (granting

defendant’s motion for summary judgment); DeCesare v. Nat’l R.R. Passenger Corp., Civ. A.

No. 98-3851, 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7560, at *2 (E.D. Pa. May 24, 1999) (granting defendant’s

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

KIMBERLY MCLAUGHLIN :

: CIVIL ACTION

:

v. :

: NO. 04-CV-6003

:

PHILADELPHIA PHILLIES :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 12th day of July, 2005, upon consideration of the Motion Of Defendant

Philadelphia Phillies To Dismiss The Complaint Pursuant To Federal Rule Of Civil Procedure

12(b)(6) (Doc. No. 4), and all papers filed in support thereof and in opposition thereto, it is

ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion is DENIED.

1

Case 2:04-cv-06003-RBS Document 6 Filed 07/12/2005 Page 1 of 2

MCLAUGHLIN v. PHILADELPHIA PHILLIES Doc. 6

Dockets.Justia.com
motion for summary judgment); McLaughlin v. Pennsylvania, Civ. A. No. 98-2686, 1999 U.S.

Dist. LEXIS 571, at *10, *14 (E.D. Pa. Jan. 25, 1999) (granting in part and denying in part

defendant’s motion for summary judgment).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT:

S:/R. Barclay Surrick, Judge

Case 2:04-cv-06003-RBS Document 6 Filed 07/12/2005 Page 2 of 2
|   | § | This      Form 10-Q fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d)      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,and |
|--------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | § | The      information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial position and results of operations of Western      Reserve Bancorp, Inc. as of and for the periods  presented. |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   |  /s/ Cynthia A. Mahl                             |   |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Cynthia      A. Mahl                                  |   |
|   | Executive      Vice President/Chief Financial Officer |   |
|   | August      13, 2010                                  |   |

----
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3. NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T T E R R Y N . HE ND E R S ON , P la in tif

f - A p p e llan t, v. M I C H A E L J . A S T R U E , C om m i s s i one rof S o ci al S ecu ri ty, D ef

endant- A pp el l ee . N o. 09- 35227 D . C. N o . 2 : 0 8 - c v - 0 0 9 8 5 - CRD ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f orthe W e s t e rn D i s tr i c tof W a s hi ngt on C a r ol y n R . D i m m i c k, D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng A r gue d a nd S ubm i tt e d F e bruary1, 2010

S e a tt l e , W a s hi ngt on B efo re: A L A R C Ó N , W . F L E T C H E R an dR A W L IN S O N , C i rcu i tJu d g es. A p p ellan t T erry N . H en d er so n (H en d er so n ) ap p ea ls th e d istrict co u rt’s de c i s i on a f

f i rm i ng the C om m i s s i one rof S oc i a l S e c ur i ty ’ s f

i ndi ng tha tH e nde r s on w a s notdi s abl e d. 

# FI LED FEB 10 2 010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSP age 2 of 2

S ubs t a nt i a l e vi de nc e s upport s the A dm i ni s tr a t i ve L aw Judge ’ s ( A L J ) f i ndi ng th a t H e n d e r s o n w a s n o t d is ab le d . A n ye rr o ro f th e A L Jin f

a ilin g to s p e c if

ic a lly ad d re ss th e o p in io n o f H en d er so n ’s th er ap ist w as h arm less b ec au se th e th er ap ist’ s o p in io n w a s c o n c lu s o ry , c o n s is te do f c h e c k e db o x e s o n af

o rm , w a s in te rn a lly in c o n s is te n t, an dd idn o t in v o lv e d e ta ile da n a ly s is . See T h o m a s v. B a rn h a rt , 278 F . 3d 947, 957 ( 9th C i r . 2002) ( s t a t i ng tha t“ [ t ] he A L Jne e d nota c c e pt ” a nyopi ni on thati s “ bri ef

, concl usory, and i nadequ at el y s up po rt ed by cl i ni ca l fi nd i ng s. ”) (c i t at i on om i tt ed). T he A L Js uf

f i c i e nt l yc ons i de r e d the opi ni on of H e nde r s on’ s e xa m i ni ng phy s i c i a n, D r . A nde r s on. A f t e rde t a i l i ng H e nde r s on’ s e xt e ns i ve m e di c a l r e c or d, the A L Js t a t e d tha the ga ve l e s s w e i ghtt o D r . A nde r s on’ s opi ni on be c aus e “ i t[ di d] nota c c ur a t e l yr e f

l e c t[ H e nde r s on’ s ] l ongi tudi na l f unc t i oni ng, ” a n appa r e nt re fe re nce t o the re l at i vel y s ho rtperi od covered by D r. A nd er son’ s opi ni on . T aken inco n tex t, th is w as a s p ec ific an dleg it im ate r ea so n fo r g iv in g D r. A n d er so n ’s opi ni on l e s s w e i ght , pa rt i c ul a r l ygi ve n the di f f e r i ng opi ni ons r e f

l e c t e d i n the r e c o r d . See C o n n et t

v. B a rn h a rt , 340 F . 3d 871, 875 ( 9th C i r . 2003) ( l i nki ng the w ei gh tgi ven t o an o pi ni on t o evi dence i n the re cord).

AF F I RME D.
Exhibit 13



HOLMES FINANCING (NO.2) PLC

04056122



ABBEY NATIONAL HOUSE

2 TRITON SQUARE, REGENTS PLACE

LONDON NW1 3AN



Certification

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)



Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18,
United States Code), the undersigned officer of the servicer does hereby certify, to such officers knowledge, that:



The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the Form 20-F) of Holmes Financing (No. 2) PLC (the
Company) fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-F fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |                
|-------------------- |  | ---------------
|Dated: June 30, 2004 |  | /s/ David Green
|                     |  | David Green    
|                     |  | Director       



A signed original of
this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
S. 1083 

One Hundred Fifteenth Congress 

of the 

United States of America 

AT THE FIRST SESSION 

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, 

the third day of January, two thousand and seventeen 

An Act 

To amend section 1214 of title 5, United States Code, to provide for stays during 

a period that the Merit Systems Protection Board lacks a quorum. 

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of 

the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

SECTION 1. STAYS BY MSPB DURING PERIODS WITH NO QUORUM. 

Section 1214(b)(1)(B) of title 5, United States Code, is 

amended— 

(1) by inserting ‘‘(i)’’ before ‘‘The Board may’’; and 

(2) by adding at the end the following: 

‘‘(ii) If the Board lacks the number of members appointed 

under section 1201 required to constitute a quorum, any remaining 

member of the Board who was appointed, by and with the advice 

and consent of the Senate, may, upon request by the Special 

Counsel, extend the period of any stay granted under subparagraph 

(A).’’. 

Speaker of the House of Representatives. 

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
## Breadcrumb

-  National Minerals Information Center 

#           Strontium  Statistics and Information      

      By National Minerals Information Center

-  Home 
-  Commodities 
-  Countries 
-  Materials Flow 
-  US States 
-  NMIC Seminars 
-  Data 
-  Multimedia 
-  Publications 
-  News 
-  Connect 
-  About 

Statistics and information on the worldwide supply of, demand for, and flow of the mineral commodity *strontium*

Strontium commonly occurs in nature, averaging 0.034% of all igneous rock; only two minerals, celestite (strontium sulfate) and strontianite (strontium carbonate), however, contain strontium in sufficient quantities to make its recovery practical. Of the two, celestite occurs much more frequently in sedimentary deposits of sufficient size to make development of mining facilities attractive. Strontianite would be the more useful of the two common minerals because strontium is used most often in the carbonate form, but few deposits have been discovered that are suitable for development.

***Subscribe**** to receive an email notification when a new publication is added to this page. On the Questions tab of the subscriber preferences page, please select "Strontium" and any other options in which you may be interested. Please see the ****list services**** page for more information.*

### **Annual Publications**

Mineral Commodity Summaries
                            - Strontium    PDF Format:       |  1996  |  1997  |  1998  |  1999  |  2000  |  2001  |  2002  |  2003  |  2004  |  2005  |  2006  |  2007  |  2008  |  2009  |  2010  |  2011  | 2012  | 2013  | 2014  | 2015  | 2016  | 2017  | 2018  |  2019  |  2020  |  2021  |  2022  |  2023  |  **2024**  |
                            - Appendixes

Minerals Yearbook
                            - Strontium    PDF Format:       |  1994  |  1995  |  1996  |  1997  |  1998  |  1999  |  2000  |  2001  |  2002  |  2003  |  2004  |  2005  |  2006  |  2007  |  2008  |  2009  |  2010  |  2011  |  2012  |  2013  |  2014  |  2015  |  2016  |  2017  |  2018  |  **2019**  |    XLS Format:       |  2002  |  2003  |  2004  |  2005  |  2006  |  2007  |  2008  |  2009  |  2010  |  2011  |  2012  |  2013  |  2014  |  2015  |  2016  |  2017  |  2018  |  **2019**  |  2020 tables-only release  |  **2021 tables-only release**  |  2022 tables-only release   |  **2023 tables-only release**   |
                            - Archive       |  1932-1993  |

### **Special Publications**

                            -  Historical Statistics for Mineral and Material Commodities in the United States    Data Series 140                               - Strontium 

### Contacts

#### Ashley Hatfield

##### Mineral Commodity Specialist

National Minerals Information Center

ahatfield@usgs.gov

703-648-7751
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS4658 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
June 25, 2015

Mr. David Siegers 4550 Pineridge Drive Holland, MI 49423

Dear Mr. Siegers:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your request for an exemption from Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) . It explains why we can not process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can Not Process Your Request

We entered your June 16, exemption request into the public docket (No. FAA-2015-2286), but we are unable to process your request any further. The information you sent does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The specific section or sections of 14 CFR from which you seek relief, the extent of the relief you seek, and the reason you seek relief.

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would benefit the public as a whole.

 The reasons why the exemption would not adversely affect safety or how the exemption would provide a level of safety at least equal to that provided by the rule from which you seek an exemption.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.2

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must send the information described earlier to reach us within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not hear from you within 30 days, we will close the docket without notifying you further. If you have any questions or require additional time, you may call (202) 267-9677.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brenda Robeson Program Analyst, Airmen and Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure
Bulletin No. 2022-05

Retention: December 31, 2022

To: Heads of Government Departments, Agencies and Others Concerned

Subject: Current Value of Funds Rate (CVFR)

1. Purpose

The Secretary of the Treasury is responsible for computing and publishing the

rate that is used for Federal debt collection, cash discounts, and rebate

evaluation. The Current Value of Funds Rate (CVFR) is a percentage based on the

current value of funds to the Department of the Treasury (Treasury).

2. Background

The CVFR percentage is based on the investment rates for the Treasury Tax and

Loan accounts set for purposes of Public Law 95-147, 91 Stat. 1227 (October 28,

1977).

Treasury annually computes the CVFR percentage by averaging investment rates for

the 12-month period ending on September 30, rounding it to the nearest whole

percentage. If the annual average (on a 12-month moving average basis) changes

by 2 percent per quarter, Treasury's Bureau of the Fiscal Service publishes the

presiding rate in the Federal Register and in a TFM bulletin.

Current and previous rates can be obtained from the CVFR Website.

3. Percentage Rate Used When Assessing Interest Charges on Outstanding Debts

Owed to the Government, Evaluating the Cost-Effectiveness of Cash Discounts, and

Considering Payment Dates for Purchase Card Invoices

The CVFR percentage for the period January 1, 2022, through December 31, 2022,

is 1 percent. This rate reflects the average investment rates for the 12-month

period ending September 30, 2021.

4. Application

Federal agencies are to apply the CVFR percentage when:

Page 1 of 2
Assessing interest charges for outstanding debts owed the government

(See 31 U.S.C. § 3717),

Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of a cash discount, see The Prompt

Payment website, and

Considering the date to pay purchase card invoices if a rebate is

offered by the card issuer. (See 5 CFR Part 1315.8). The Prompt Payment

website provides a calculator that automatically calculates the net

savings to the government, enabling the agency to determine whether it

should pay the invoice early or on the Prompt Payment due date.

5. Rescission

This bulletin will rescind TFM Volume I, Bulletin No. 2021-05.

6. Effective Date

This bulletin is effective on January 1, 2022.

7. Inquiries

Department of the Treasury

Bureau of the Fiscal Service

Payment Management

E-Commerce Division (LC-RM 349B)

3201 Pennsy Drive, Building E

Landover, MD 20785

Telephone 202-874-9428

Date: December 17, 2021

Page 2 of 2
### -80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74 37 38 39 40 

## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲


## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 05/30 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 30 May 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.77 N 77.11 WMeters AGL 

## ★

■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★ ● ● ● ● 

## ★ ● ● ● ●