alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SETONDJI VIRGILE NAHUM, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

 v. 

LONNIE SPEAR; AMBER HODGE; 

HOME DEPOT USA, INC.; GEORGE M. 

DEREZES; JAMES P. SCOTT; CITY OF 

SEATTLE, 

Defendants-Appellees, 

and 

SEATTLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, 

Defendant.

No. 21-35225 

D.C. No. 2:20-cv-01151-DWC 

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Washington

David W. Christel, Magistrate Judge, Presiding**

Submitted June 15, 2022***

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The parties consented to proceed before a magistrate judge. See 28 

U.S.C. § 636(c).

*** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

JUN 29 2022

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
 2 21-35225 

Before: SILVERMAN, WATFORD, and FORREST, Circuit Judges. 

Setondji Virgile Nahum appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment 

dismissing his action alleging various federal and state law claims in connection 

with the filing of a police report. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. 

We review de novo a dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). 

Colony Cove Props, LLC v. City of Carson, 640 F.3d 948, 955 (9th Cir. 2011). We 

affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Nahum’s action because Nahum failed 

to allege facts sufficient to state a plausible claim for relief. See Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 

556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (to avoid dismissal, “a complaint must contain sufficient 

factual matter, accepted as true, to state a claim to relief that is plausible on its 

face” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)); see also West v. Atkins, 487 

U.S. 42, 48 (1988) (elements of a § 1983 claim); Evans v. McKay, 869 F.2d 1341, 

1344 (9th Cir. 1989) (in a § 1981 action, “plaintiffs must show intentional 

discrimination on account of race”); Castro v. County of Los Angeles, 833 F.3d 

1060, 1073-76 (9th Cir. 2016) (en banc) (discussing requirements for municipal 

liability); Phoenix Trading, Inc. v. Loops LLC, 732 F.3d 936, 942 (9th Cir. 2013) 

(explaining immunity for statements made to government entities under Wash. 

Rev. Code § 4.24.510; providing that it does not include a good faith requirement); 

Reykdal v. Espinoza, 473 P.3d 1221, 1224 (Wash. 2020) (setting forth elements of 
 3 21-35225 

a defamation claim); Harper v. State, 429 P.3d 1071, 1076 (Wash. 2018)

(discussing elements of a gross negligence claim)

We do not consider matters not specifically and distinctly raised and argued 

in the opening brief, or arguments raised for the first time on appeal. See Padgett 

v. Wright, 587 F.3d 983, 985 n.2 (9th Cir. 2009).

AFFIRMED.
No. 57932.

protests 156661-K, etc. (New York).

#### Ignaz Strauss & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the articles in question consist of silent butlers, smoothing irons, and various other trays, the composition of which is the same in all material respects as the merchandise involved in *Ignaz Strauss & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 342, C. D. 710), *The Fan Co.*v. *United States*(25 Cust. Ct. 42, C. D. 1261), and *Ignaz Strauss & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(28 Cust. Ct. 280, C. D. 1423). In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of the decisions cited, the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (1) The items marked with the letter “A” as household utensils, composed wholly or in chief value of brass, not plated with platinum, gold, or silver, as follows: (a) As to the items entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption prior to June 28, 1944, at 40 percent under paragraph 339; (b) as to the items entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption on or after said date and prior to May 22, 1948, at 30 percent under said paragraph 339, as modified by the trade agreement with Iran (T.'D. 51067); and (c) as to the items entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption on and after May 22, 1948, at 15 percent under said paragraph 339, as modified by T. D. 51802, supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T. D. 51909); (2) the items marked with the letter “B” at 35 percent under the provision in paragraph 339, as modified by the trade agreement with the United Kingdom (T. D. 49753), for household utensils, composed wholly or in chief value of copper, not plated with platinum, gold, or silver; (3) the items marked with the letter “C” at 25 percent under the provision in paragraph 339, as modified by T. D. 51802, for household utensils, plated with silver on copper; (4) the items marked with the letter “D” at 25 percent under paragraph 339, as modified by T. D. 49753, *supra,*as household utensils, composed wholly or in chief value of pewter, not plated with *432platinum, gold, 'or silver; and (5) the items marked with the letter “E” at 35 percent under paragraph 209 as manufactures of soapstone.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WILLIAM and ELIZABETH BURNS :

: CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-CV-4233

Plaintiffs, :

:

v. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION;

BAYER AG;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE;

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM

:

:

:

:

:

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

:

Defendants. :

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of the Court:

Kindly enter the appearances of Hope S. Freiwald, Aline Fairweather, Erin

Brennan and Kirstin J. Miller as attorneys for defendant SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a

GlaxoSmithKline.

Respectfully Submitted,

_____________________________ _____________________________

Hope S. Freiwald Aline Fairweather

_____________________________ _____________________________

Erin Brennan Kirstin J. Miller

DECHERT PRICE & RHOADS

4000 Bell Atlantic Tower

1717 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2793

(215) 994-4000

Case 2:02-cv-04233-CG Document 7 Filed 09/16/2002 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 23

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration
Statement on Form S-8 for the Company's 1996 Stock Option Plan and 1996
Recognition and Retention Plan (Registration No. 333-83198) of our report dated
January 30, 2004 relating to the consolidated financial statements of Alpena
Bancshares, Inc. as of December 31, 2003 which appear in the December 31, 2003
Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Alpena Bancshares, Inc.

/s/ PLANTE & MORAN, PLLC


Auburn Hills, Michigan
March 26, 2004
EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Alto Palermo Sociedad Anónima (the company) for the year ended
June 30, 2010 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Alejandro G. Elsztain, as Chief Executive Officer of the company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                            
|----------------------------
|/s/    ALEJANDRO G. ELSZTAIN
|By: Alejandro G. Elsztain   
|Chief Executive Officer     
|                            
|December 30, 2010           

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except as to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed
by the company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Order filed October 7, 2020

In The

Court of Appeals 

For The

First District of Texas 

___________

NO. 01-19-00608-CR

____________

TAIRON JOSE MONJARAS, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 232nd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 1614762

ORDER
This court has determined, pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 

34.5(f) and 34.6(g)(2), that it must inspect the original of State's Exhibit 1 and 

State's Exhibit 2.

The exhibit clerk of the 232nd District Court is directed to deliver to the 

Clerk of this court the original of State's Exhibit 1 and State's Exhibit 2, on or 

before October 12, 2020. The Clerk of this court is directed to receive, maintain, 

and keep safe this original exhibit; to deliver it to the justices of this court for their 

inspection; and, upon completion of inspection, to return the original of State's 

Exhibit 1 and State's Exhibit 2, to the clerk of the 232nd District Court.

PER CURIAM

Panels consists of Justices Kelly, Goodman, and Countiss
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

REBECCA ROMERO,

Appellant,

v.

ADRIAN BRABHAM,

Appellee.

Nos. 4D20-2468 and 4D20-2680

[October 14, 2021]

Consolidated appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial 

Circuit, Palm Beach County; Maxine Cheesman, Judge; L.T. Case No. 

50-2015-DR-003902-XXXX-MB.

Rebecca Romero, Manalapan, pro se.

John D. Boykin of Ciklin Lubitz, West Palm Beach, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

GROSS, MAY and DAMOORGIAN, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
## COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02

- 14

- 00240

- CV

Henry Rahmani and Rahmani Management, LLC

v.

Dan Banet §

§

§

§ From the 96th District Court

of Tarrant County (96

- 241990

- 09)

May 7 , 2015

Opinion by Justice Charles Bleil



### JUDGMENT ON REHEARING

After reviewing Appellant Henry Rahmani and Rahmani Management,

LLC’s motion for rehearing, we deny the motion. We withdraw our March 26,

2015 opinion and substitute the following. This court has again considered the

record on appeal in this case and holds that there was error in the trial court’s

judgment. It is ordered that the trial court’s judgment is modified to delete the

$35,000 award against appellant Henry Rahm ani , and we reverse the portion of

the judgment awarding attorney’s fees to appellee Dan Banet and remand that

portion of the case for a new trial in light of our modification to the judgment. We

affirm the remainder of the judgment as modified.It is f urther ordered that a ppellee shall bear the costs of this appeal , for

which let execution issue. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4; see also Tex. R. Civ. P.

139.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By

_ /s/ Charles Bleil

________________ Justice Charles Bleil
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-7061

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

AARON WILLIAM DANGERFIELD, a/k/a Dusty,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District

Judge. (CR-02-32-A, CA-03-549-AM)

Submitted: November 19, 2003 Decided: December 4, 2003

Before WILKINSON and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Aaron William Dangerfield, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Edward Rich,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Aaron William Dangerfield seeks to appeal the district court’s

orders denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255

(2000), and denying his motion for reconsideration. The orders are

not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A

certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial

showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C.

§ 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that his

constitutional claims are debatable and that any dispositive

procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or

wrong. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack

v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676,

683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and

conclude that Dangerfield has not made the requisite showing.

Accordingly, we deny his motion for a certificate of appealability

and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
# C_2017239EN.01001701.xml

| 24.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 239/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 239/17

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 17 May 2017 — Portuguese Republic v European Commission

(Case C-337/16 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - EAGF and EAFRD - European Commission implementing decision - Notification to the addressee - Subsequent rectification of the print lay-out of the annex - Publication of the decision in the Official Journal of the European Union - Time limit for bringing an action - Point from which time starts to run - Delay - Inadmissibility))

(2017/C 239/21)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Portuguese Republic (represented by: L. Inez Fernandes, M. Figueiredo, J. Saraiva de Almeida and P. Estêvão, acting as Agents)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: D. Triantafyllou and M. França, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Portuguese Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 326, 5.9.2016.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 218 (Tuesday, November 14, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 78015-78016]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-25040]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records

AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), DOE.

ACTION: Rescindment of a system of records notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Pursuant to the Privacy Act of 1974 and Office of Management 
and Budget (OMB) Circular No. A-108, the Federal Energy Regulatory 
Commission (FERC) proposes to rescind an existing system of records 
notice. The following SORN is being proposed for rescindment: ``FERC-
61: Request for Commission Publications and Information.'' The basis 
for rescindment is explained below.

DATES: Please submit comments on this rescindment notice on or before 
December 14, 2023. If no public comment is received during the period 
allowed for comment or unless otherwise published in the Federal 
Register by FERC, the rescindment will become effective a minimum of 30 
days after the date of publication in the Federal Register. If FERC 
receives public comments, FERC shall review the comments to determine 
whether any changes to the notice are necessary.

ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted in writing to Federal Energy 
Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20426, or 
electronically to <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#eb9b99829d8a8892ab8d8e9988c58c849d"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="3e4e4c57485f5d477e585b4c5d10595148">[email protected]</span></a>. Comments should indicate that they 
are submitted in response to ``Request for Commission Publications and 
Information (FERC-61).''

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Lakesha Abney, Supervisory Records and 
Information Management Specialist, Office of the Secretary, Records 
Management Team, Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 888 First Street 
NE, Washington, DC 20426, (202) 502-8400.

[[Page 78016]]


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: OMB requires that each agency provide 
assurance that systems of records do not duplicate any existing agency 
or government-wide systems of records. FERC-61: Requests for Commission 
Publications and Information) was identified for rescindment because 
the SORN is duplicative and covered by another FERC system of records. 
Specifically, FERC-61: Requests for Commission Publications and 
Information is duplicative of and shares the same purpose as the 
records covered by FERC-62: Public Information Requests, Federal 
Register Citation: 88 FR 36308.

SYSTEM NAME AND NUMBER:
    Request for Commission Publications and Information--FERC-61.

HISTORY:
    79 FR 17532 (March 28, 2014).

    Issued: November 7, 2023.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-25040 Filed 11-13-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT 0F 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bear Island Paper Company LLC (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Edward D. Sherrick, Vice President of Finance [Chief Financial Officer] of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods
presented in this Report.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





By:

/s/ Edward D. SherrickEdward D. SherrickVice President of Finance(Chief Financial Officer)May 17, 2004




This certification accompanies
the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of § 18 of the Securities Act of 1934, as amended.
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Department of Health and Human Services Health Resources and Services Administration
 AGENCY: Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), Department of Health and Human Services.
 ACTION: Announcing Funding Supplement for National Rural Health Information Clearinghouse Program recipient.
 SUMMARY: HRSA provided supplemental award funds to the National Rural Health Information Clearinghouse Program recipient to develop toolkits and other resources that address strategies to promote rural community health.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sarah Scott, Federal Office of Rural Health Policy, HRSA, at 
                        *sscott2@hrsa.gov*
                         and (301) 287-2619.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  *Intended Recipient of the Award:*
                     The University of North Dakota. *Amount of Non-Competitive Award:*
                     One award for $485,000. *Project Period:*
                     June 1, 2023, to May 31, 2024. *CFDA Number:*
                     93.223. *Award Instrument:*
                     Supplement. *Authority:*
                     Social Security Act 711(b) (42 U.S.C. 912(b)). Table 1—Recipients and Award Amounts
Grant No.
Award recipient name
City, State
Supplemental award amountU56RH05539
University of North Dakota
Grand Forks, ND
$485,000
 *Justification:*
                     This funding will provide a one-time supplement to the University of North Dakota via the National Rural Health Information Clearinghouse Program. This supplement will allow the University of North Dakota to build on past and ongoing projects supported by HRSA to improve health care in rural areas by serving as a primary resource for information, opportunities, and tools related to rural health. The supplement will allow the University of North Dakota to create new toolkits and resources on important topics related to rural community health. This builds upon the planned work within the scope of its existing award. Carole Johnson, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2023-25068 Filed 11-13-23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4165-15-P
CHRISTOPHER CRUZ WALLEY

, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA

, Appellee

. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

CASE NO. 1D 15

- 2334

_____________________________/

Opinion filed February 7, 2017.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Washington County

. Colby Peel , Judge

. Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, Shannon M Hemmendinger, Assistant Public Defender, Miami

- Dade , for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Thomas H. Duffy, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee , for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

ROBERTS , C.J.

, ROWE

, and MAKAR

, J J

. , CONCUR.
# C_2017249EN.01001401.xml

| 31.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 249/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 249/14

---

Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 May 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší soud České republiky — Czech Republic) — Jitka Svobodová v Česká republika — Okresní soud v Náchodě

(Case C-653/16) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Factual and regulatory background to the dispute in the main proceedings - Absence of sufficient information - Manifest inadmissibility - Article 53(2) and Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court))

(2017/C 249/20)

Language of the case: Czech

Referring court

Nejvyšší soud České republiky

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Jitka Svobodová

Defendant: Česká republika — Okresní soud v Náchodě

In the presence of: Česká republika — Ministerstvo spravedlnosti ČR

Re:

The application for a preliminary ruling brought by the Nejvyšší soud (Supreme Court, Czech Republic), by decision of 2 December 2016, is manifestly inadmissible.

---

(1)  
  OJ C 78, 13.3.2017.

---