alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. F E RNA ND O MAR QU E Z - B AR R AZ A, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 09- 50373 D. C . No . 3 : 0 9 - c r - 0 1 3 7 6 - GT ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e S o u th e rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia G or don T hom ps on, J r . , D i s tr i c tJ udge , P r e s i di ng

S ubm i tt e d M a y25, 2010 ** B e f o r e : C A N B Y , T H O M A S , a n dW . F L E T C H E R , C ir c u it J u d g e s . F ernand o M ar qu ez -B arra zaappeal s f rom the 63 -m on th sent ence i m po se d fol l ow i ng hi s gui l ty- pl eaconv i ct i on for bei ng an i l l egal al i en i n the U ni t ed S t at es 

# FI LED JU N 18 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS09- 50373 2 a f t e rde port a t i on, i n vi ol a t i on of 8 U . S . C . § 1326. W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 U . S. C. § 1 2 9 1 , a n dw e a f f i rm. M a r q u e z - B a rr a z ac o n te n d s th a t h is s e n te n c e is s u b s ta n tiv e lyu n r e a s o n ab le because i ti s l on ger than the on e j oi nt l y r ec om m ended i n the part i es ’ pl ea a gr e e m e nta nd i s gr e a t e rtha n ne c e s s a ry . I n l i ghtof the t ot a l i tyof

the c i r c um s t a nc e s of

thi s c a s e a nd the 18 U . S . C . § 3553( a ) s e nt e nc i ng f a c t or s , the s e n te n c e is s u b s ta n tiv e lyr e a s o n ab le . Se e U n ite d Sta tes v . Ca r ty , 520 F . 3d 984, 99 3-94 (9th C i r. 20 08 ) ( en banc); se e al so G al l v. U ni ted States , 552 U . S . 38, 51 (200 7). A F F I R M E D .
<PAGE>

                                   EXHIBIT 32



                                  CERTIFICATION
                                       OF
                             CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                       AND
                             CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                           PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      I, Eliron Yaron, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2003, that the Annual Report on Form
10-KSB of Shelron Group, Inc.. for the year ended December 31, 2003 fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on
Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of Shelron Group, Inc.

By: /s/ Eliron Yaron
    --------------------------
    Name:  Eliron Yaron
    Title: Chairman, Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer

                                       25
----

| Parent Company                                   |   | Subsidiary Companies                        |   | State of Incorporation |
|-------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------|
|                                                  |   |                                             |   |                             |
| First      Federal of Northern Michigan Bancorp, Inc. |   | First      Federal of Northern Michigan          |   | Federal                          |
|                                                  |   |                                             |   |                             |
| First      Federal of Northern Michigan               |   | Financial      Services and Mortgage Corporation |   | Michigan                         |
|                                                  |   |                                             |   |                             |
| First      Federal of Northern Michigan               |   | FFNM      Agency, Inc                            |   | Michigan                         |

----
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1101

To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to improve the ability of

individuals and local, State, and Federal agencies to prevent natural

flood disaster.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 11, 1999

Mr. POMBO introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee

on Resources

A BILL

To amend the Endangered Species Act of 1973 to improve

the ability of individuals and local, State, and Federal

agencies to prevent natural flood disaster.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 SECTION 1. PURPOSE.

4 The purpose of this Act is to assist individuals and

5 local, State, and Federal agencies in complying with the

6 Endangered Species Act of 1973 in reconstructing or re7 pairing of flood control levee structures to address immi8 nent threats to public health or safety or catastrophic nat-
2

•HR 1101 IH

1 ural events and in maintaining the structural integrity of

2 those structures.

3 SEC. 2. AMENDMENTS TO ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT OF

4 1973.

5 (a) ACTIONS EXEMPT FROM CONSULTATION AND

6 CONFERENCING.—Section 7(a) of the Endangered Species

7 Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1536(a)) is amended by adding

8 at the end the following new paragraph:

9 ‘‘(5) Consultation and conferencing under paragraphs

10 (2) and (4) is not required for any agency action that—

11 ‘‘(A) consists of reconstruction or repair of a

12 Federal or non-Federal levee structure—

13 ‘‘(i) to address a critical, imminent threat

14 to public health or safety; or

15 ‘‘(ii) to address a catastrophic natural

16 event; or

17 ‘‘(B) consists of maintaining the structural in18 tegrity of a Federal or non-Federal levee structure.’’.

19 (b) EXCLUSION FROM TAKINGS PROHIBITION.—Sec20 tion 9(a) of such Act (16 U.S.C. 1538(a)) is amended by

21 adding at the end the following new paragraph:

22 ‘‘(3) For purposes of this subsection, an activity of

23 a Federal or non-Federal person is not a taking of a spe24 cies if the activity—
3

•HR 1101 IH

1 ‘‘(A) consists of reconstruction or repair of a

2 Federal or non-Federal levee structure—

3 ‘‘(i) to address a critical, imminent threat

4 to public health or safety; or

5 ‘‘(ii) to address a catastrophic natural

6 event; or

7 ‘‘(B) consists of maintaining the structural in8 tegrity of a Federal or non-Federal levee structure.’’.

Æ
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

THE CHESTER COUNTY HOSPITAL : CIVIL ACTION

:

V. :

:

INDEPENDENCE BLUE CROSS :

ET AL : NO. 02-2746

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 1st day of October, 2003, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 

Defendants’ Motion to Compel the Return of Privileged Mediation Documents and Motion for a

Protective Order Precluding the Use of Such Documents (Doc. No. 119) is referred to United

States Magistrate Judge Charles B. Smith for resolution.

 

BY THE COURT:

 

JOHN R. PADOVA, J.

Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 140 Filed 10/01/2003 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 12.1


SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION





I, Alejandro G. Elsztain, certify that:





1.
 I have reviewed
this amendment to the annual report on Form 20-F of IRSA
Propiedades Comerciales S.A. (the “Company”) for the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2019;





2.
 Based on my
knowledge, this amendment to the annual report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;





3.
 The Company’s
other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15(d)-15(e)) and internal control
over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the Company and have:





a.
 Designed such
disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervisions, to
ensure that material information relating to the Company, including
its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report
is being prepared;





b.
 Designed such
internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our
supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles;





c.
 Evaluated the
effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the
end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation;





d.
 Disclosed in this
report any change in the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the
annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over
financial reporting; and





4.
 The Company’s
other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
the Company’s auditors and the audit committee of the
Company’s board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):





a.
 All significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the Company’s ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information;
and





b.
 Any fraud, whether
or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the Company’s internal control
over financial reporting.





IRSA Propiedades Comerciales S.A.January
06, 2020
By:
/s/ Alejandro
G. ElsztainAlejandro
G. ElsztainChief
Executive Officer
Skip to Main Content Contact Us|About Us|Sign In
     Top Links
 Project Search Navigation
 Home
 Funding
 Research
 Publications
 Newsletters
    Image Container
  <span>Wildfire Matters Podcast</span>
 Wildfire Matters PodcastClick here to learn more.&P1_SLIDE_HEADER_6
 ADVANCES IN WILDLAND FIREFIGHTER SAFETYAdvances in Wildland Firefighter SafetyPhoto Credit:  Missoula Fire Lab
					pdf documentResearch needs assessment
					pdf documentPredicting firefighter fatality conditions
					pdf documentClassifying firefighter entrapments
					pdf documentFirefighter Escape Route Index<span>New JFSP Login</span>
 New JFSP LoginClick here to learn more.<span>2023 FSEN Report</span>Subscribe
 **Subscribe to our weekly****Friday Flash eNews!**
Past NewslettersMiddle
 Exchanges
 Fire Science Exchange NetworkGet Connected...Middle
 Lines of WorkWhat is a line of work?
                    The Interagency Fuel Treatment Decision Support System (IFT-DSS)
                    Smoke Management and Air Quality
                    Fuel Treatment Effects and EffectivenessNew
 EventsFooter
 The Basics
			Fire Science Info
			Partners
			What is FireScience.gov?HomeContact UsAbout Us
			Fire Science Exchange NetworkFundingResearchPublicationsNewsletters
			Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | FOIA | Accessibility
            The Joint Fire Science Program funds scientific research on wildland fires and 
                distributes results to help policymakers, fire managers and practitioners make sound 
                decisions. More...
          Release 1.0
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MICHAEL CARDASHIAM :

: CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-CV-4138

Plaintiff, :

:

v. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION;

BAYER AG;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE;

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM

:

:

:

:

:

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

:

Defendants. :

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of the Court:

Kindly enter the appearances of Hope S. Freiwald, Aline Fairweather, Erin

Brennan and Kirstin J. Miller as attorneys for defendant GlaxoSmithKline PLC.

Respectfully Submitted,

_____________________________ _____________________________

Hope S. Freiwald Aline Fairweather

_____________________________ _____________________________

Erin Brennan Kirstin J. Miller

DECHERT PRICE & RHOADS

4000 Bell Atlantic Tower

1717 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2793

(215) 994-4000

Case 2:02-cv-04138-JP Document 7 Filed 09/11/2002 Page 1 of 1
Before the Second Division,

July 20, 1945

No. 50359.

#### Protests 533860-G, etc., of John H. Tice, Jr., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.-
Before the First Division,

February 19, 1948

No. 52181.

protests 11686-K, etc. (New York).

#### Garrard Sales Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of record changer units similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Garrard Sales Corp.*v. *United States*(35 C. C. P. A. 39, C. A. D. 369). In accordance therewith the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
한국어 

대출자 대상 언어 관련 안내 

귀하의 주택담보대출 거래는 영어로 진행될 가능성이 큽니다. 귀하께서 받으시는 정보와

서명하시게 될 공식 서류는 영어로 되어 있을 가능성이 큽니다.

귀하께서 해당 거래를 이해하시기 바랍니다. 영어 서류를 보완하기 위해 번역본이 있을 수

있습니다. 이러한 서류는 귀하께서 거래를 이해하시는 데 도움이 됩니다. 귀하의 대출기관 또는

서비스 제공자가 번역 서비스나 번역된 서류를 제공하지 못할 수 있습니다.

언어 지원 및 자료는 미주택도시개발국(HUD)이 승인한 주택상담기관을 통해서도 이용하실 수

있습니다. www.hud.gov/counseling 에서 HUD의 승인을 받은 주택상담기관 목록을 찾을 수

있습니다. 

1. 가까운 "housing counseling agency"을 선택한 다음, 주를 선택하십시오. 

2. 해당 지역의 주택상담기관을 검색하려면 "Click here to narrow your search "을 선택하고

언어를 선택하십시오.

3. 또는 미국 연방정부 주택공사800-569-4287에 전화하셔서 카운셀러를 찾아 주십시오.

주택 관련 상담 카운셀러는 아래의 웹사이트에서도 찾으실 수 있습니다. 

www.consumerfinance.gov/find-a-housing-counselor.
# C_2017277EN.01001701.xml

| 21.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 277/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 277/17

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 15 June 2017 — Kingdom of Spain v European Commission, Republic of Latvia

(Case C-279/16 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Action for annulment - EAGGF, EAGF and EAFRD - Expenditure excluded from EU financing - Expenditure incurred by the Kingdom of Spain))

(2017/C 277/22)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: J. García-Valdecasas Dorrego and V. Ester Casas, acting as Agents)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: D. Triantafyllou and I. Galindo Martín, acting as Agents), Republic of Latvia

Other parties to the proceedings:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 279, 1.8.2016.

1

---
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Shoe Pavilion, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for
the period ended July 1, 2006 (the "Report"), I, Bruce Ross, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to  §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

/s/Bruce RossExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
                   August 10, 2006

---
October 23, 2014



### JUDGMENT 

## The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

DELLA GOINES , Appellant

NO. 14

- 14

- 00627

- CV V.

SRMOF 2009

- I TRUST, BY WELLS FA RGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION NOT IN I TS INDIVIDUAL OR BAN KING CAPACITY BUT SOLEY AS CERTIFICATE TRUSTEE OF THE TRUST , Appellee s

________________________________ Today the Court heard its own motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment signed by the court below on July 23, 2014. Having considered the motion and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED

. We further order that all costs incurred by reason of this appeal be paid by appellant, Della Goines. We further order this decision certified below for observance.
No. 48400.

#### Protest 98506-K of Dan Brechner & Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following Abstract 47474 the clay hanging ducks in question were held dutiable as manufactures in chief value of metal, not. plated, at 45 .percent under paragraph 397, as claimed. Other similar novelties, but in chief value of fur, were held dutiable at 50 percent under paragraph 1519 (e), as claimed.
Before the First Division,

May 22, 1957

No. 60765.

#### Paul E. Sernau, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 283766-K (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of metal dime savings banks in chief value of tin or tin plate the same in all material respects as those the subject of *M. Pressner & Co.*v. *United States*(36 Cust. Ct. 262, C. D. 1784), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# C_2016191EN.01005102.xml

| 30.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 191/51 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 191/51

---

Action brought on 17 February 2016 — ZZ v European Ombudsman

(Case F-10/16)

(2016/C 191/74)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ZZ (represented by: M. Vasileios A. Christianos, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Ombudsman

Defendant:

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Subject-matter and description of the proceedings

Annulment of the decision of the European Ombudsman not to appoint the applicant to the post of Secretary-General of the Ombudsman’s office and an order that the defendant pay damages in respect of the material and non-pecuniary losses allegedly suffered by the applicant.

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Annul the contested decision of 9 November 2015 of the European Ombudsman, by which it rejected the applicant’s administrative claims; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the contested decision of 9 November 2015 of the European Ombudsman, by which it rejected the applicant’s administrative claims;

| — | Annul the decision of 10 April 2015, which denied the applicant an interview, and the decision of 16 July 2015 appointing B.G. to the post of Secretary-General of the Ombudsman’s office; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of 10 April 2015, which denied the applicant an interview, and the decision of 16 July 2015 appointing B.G. to the post of Secretary-General of the Ombudsman’s office;

| — | Order the European Ombudsman to pay the applicant the sum of EUR 112 472,64 as compensation for the material loss suffered by him; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the European Ombudsman to pay the applicant the sum of EUR 112 472,64 as compensation for the material loss suffered by him;

| — | Order the European Ombudsman to pay the applicant the sum of thirty thousand euros (EUR 30 000) as compensation for the non-pecuniary loss suffered by him; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the European Ombudsman to pay the applicant the sum of thirty thousand euros (EUR 30 000) as compensation for the non-pecuniary loss suffered by him;

| — | Order the European Ombudsman to pay all the applicant’s costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the European Ombudsman to pay all the applicant’s costs.

---
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 14.1



The Management Board and Supervisory Board


Allianz Aktiengesellschaft



We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
Form S-8 relating to the Allianz of America, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan
of Allianz Aktiengesellschaft ("Allianz") of our report dated July 11, 2003,
except for Note 2, as to which the date is November 28, 2003, with respect to
the consolidated balance sheets of Allianz and its subsidiaries (collectively,
the "Allianz Group") as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related
consolidated statements of income, movements in shareholders' equity and cash
flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002,
and the financial statement Schedules I, II, III and IV, which report appears in
the December 31, 2002 Annual Report on Form 20-F, as amended by Amendment No. 1
on Form 20-F/A of Allianz.



Our report refers to Allianz's restatement of its financial statements for the
three-year period ended December 31, 2002.



/s/ KPMG Deutsche Treuhand-Gesellschaft


     Aktiengesellschaft


     Wirtschaftsprufungsgesellschaft



KPMG Deutsche Treuhand-Gesellschaft


Aktiengesellschaft


Wirtschaftsprufungsgesellschaft



Munich, Germany


November 28, 2003
No. 55858.

protest 166218-K (A) (New York).

#### S. R. Droescher, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.
# C_2018190EN.01001702.xml

| 4.6.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 190/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.6.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 190/17

---

Order of the President of the Court of 16 February 2018 — Council of the European Union v PT Wilmar Bioenergi Indonesia, PT Wilmar Nabati Indonesia, European Commission, European Biodiesel Board (EBB)

(Case C-603/16 P) (1)

1

(2018/C 190/24)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 30, 31.1.2017.

1

---
Before the Third Division,

November 19, 1953

No. 57625.

#### Inter-Maritime Forwarding Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 200405-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.
No. 53469.

protests 620500-G, etc. (New York).

#### Van Raalte Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of knit fabric the same in all material respects as the fabric of which the gloves the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333) were made. The claim of the plaintiff was therefore sustained.
No. 61709.

#### Cosmos Shipping Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 307313-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protest was dismissed.