alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016475EN.01001002.xml

| 19.12.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 475/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.12.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 475/10

---

Appeal brought on 27 May 2016 by Médis — Companhia portuguesa de seguros de saúde, SA against the order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 15 March 2016 in Case T-774/15: Médis v EUIPO — Médis

(Case C-313/16 P)

(2016/C 475/14)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Médis — Companhia portuguesa de seguros de saúde, SA (represented by: M. Martinho do Rosário, advogada)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

Other party to the proceedings:

By order of 19 October 2016 the Court of Justice (Eight Chamber) held that the appeal was inadmissible.

---
# C_2017392EN.01001002.xml

| 20.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 392/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 392/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 21 September 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Înalta Curte de Casație şi Justiție — Romania) — SMS group GmbH v Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice București

(Case C-441/16) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Value added tax (VAT) - Eighth Directive 79/1072/EEC - Directive 2006/112/EC - Taxable person residing in another Member State - Refund of VAT charged on imported goods - Conditions - Objective elements confirming the intention of the taxable person to use the imported goods in the course of his economic activities - Serious risk of non-completion of the transaction that justified the importation))

(2017/C 392/14)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Referring court

Înalta Curte de Casație şi Justiție

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: SMS group GmbH

Applicant:

Defendant: Direcţia Generală Regională a Finanțelor Publice București

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Eighth Council Directive 79/1072/EEC of 6 December 1979 on the harmonisation of the laws of the Member States relating to turnover taxes — Arrangements for the refund of value added tax to taxable persons not established in the territory of the country, read in conjunction with Article 170 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, must be interpreted as precluding a refusal by a Member State to refund the value added tax paid on the importation of goods to a taxable person who is not established on its territory in circumstances such as those in the main proceedings where, at the time of importation, the performance of the contract in connection with which the taxable person purchased and imported those goods was suspended, the transaction for which they were intended to be used was in the end not carried out, and the taxable person did not provide proof of their subsequent movements.

---

(1)  OJ C 419, 14.11.2016.

1

---
Before the Third Division,

January 23, 1951

No. 55159.

#### Mutual Spice Co. *v.*United States,

protest 165786-K (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of laurel leaves similar to those the subject of *The Levy & Levis Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(23 Cust. Ct. 8, C. D. 1180), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
InteragencyTaskForceon

CoastGuardRolesandMissions

 

 

Chairman�sLetter****
TaskForceMembers****
TaskForceStaff****
Tableofcontents****
ExecutiveSummary- Introduction 
MissionoftheTaskForce

OverviewoftheU.S.CoastGuard

CoastGuard�sRoleinaChangingWorld

TaskForceMethodology
- StrategicGoalsandMissionProfiles   MaritimeSecurity  AlienMigrantInterdictionOperation  DrugInterdiction  NationalDefense  ProtectionofNaturalResources  LivingMarineResources  MarineEnvironmentalProtection  MaritimeSafety  Mobility  EffectivenessandEfficiency  DeepwaterCapabilitiesReplacementProject****
Introduction

CoastGuardCapitalAssetManagement:

ASystemofSystems

DeepwaterCapabilitiesReplacementProject

Stewardship
Conclusions

Introduction

OverarchingConclusions&Recommendations

MissionProfileConclusions&Recommendations

ClosingStatement

Appendices
ExecutiveOrder****
ListingofMeetingsandGuestPanelists****
ListingofFieldTripsMadebyTaskForceMembers****
CorrespondencetoInteragencyTaskForce****
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the amended Annual Report of Watair Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Thomas M. Braid, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of
operations of the Company.



/s/ Thomas M. BraidThomas M. BraidChief Financial Officer


January 26, 2011
No. 58453.

protest 202502-K (Pembina).

#### Norman G. Jensen, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that the subject of *United States*v. *Geo. Wm. Rueff, Inc.*(41 C. C. P. A. 95, C. A. D. 535), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: May 9, 2007
    By:
    /s/ Charles P. HuffmanCharles P. HuffmanSenior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Reap. Dec. 10658)

Entry No. F-13227.

#### J. H. Phillips F. W. Myers & Company, Incorporated *v.*United States

(Decided January 7, 1964)

*William 0. Gordon*for the plaintiffs.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Olivee, Chief Judge:

Counsel for the respective parties have submitted this appeal for reappraisement for decision on a written stipulation, reading as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for the respective parties, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise invoiced as “Imperse Napth'ol Red” is a coal-tar chemical provided for in paragraph 28(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930 and was appraised on the basis of American selling price, as that value is defined in section 402(e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that such basis of appraisement is not contested by either party and that the American selling price for said merchandise at the time of exportation thereof to the United States, defined as aforesaid, is $.69 per pound, less *1%,*packed.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that the appeal for reappraisement is limited to the above specified merchandise, and is abandoned as to all other invoiced merchandise.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED that this appeal for reappraisement be submitted for decision on this stipulation.

*404.On the agreed facts, I find that the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question, as hereinabove identified, is American selling price, as defined in section 402(e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 (T.D. 54165), and that such statutory value therefor is $0.69 per pound, less 1 per céntima, packed.

As to all other merchandise included on the invoice covered by the entry involved herein, the appeal for reappraisement is dismissed.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.
# C_2017121EN.01000802.xml

| 18.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 121/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 121/8

---

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 2 March 2017 — European Commission v Hellenic Republic

(Case C-160/16) (1)

1

((Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Energy policy - Energy performance of buildings - Directive 2010/31/EU - Article 5(2) - Report on cost-optimal levels))

(2017/C 121/11)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: G. Zavvos and K. Talabér-Ritz, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: N. Dafniou, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1) | declares that, since the Hellenic Republic failed to submit a report on cost-optimal levels, as is laid down in Article 5(2) of Directive 2010/31/ΕU (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May 2010 on the energy performance of buildings, as supplemented by Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 244/2012 (2) of 16 January 2012 establishing a comparative methodology framework for calculating cost-optimal levels of minimum energy performance requirements for buildings and building elements, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 5(2) of Directive 2010/31. |
| --- | --- |

1)

declares that, since the Hellenic Republic failed to submit a report on cost-optimal levels, as is laid down in Article 5(2) of Directive 2010/31/ΕU (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May 2010 on the energy performance of buildings, as supplemented by Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) No 244/2012 (2) of 16 January 2012 establishing a comparative methodology framework for calculating cost-optimal levels of minimum energy performance requirements for buildings and building elements, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Article 5(2) of Directive 2010/31.

| 2. | orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 251, 11.7.2016.

1

---
Before the Third Division,

October 10, 1957

No. 61250.

protests 311100-K, 311437-K, and 312134-K (New York).

#### Morganite, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of carbon powder similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Morganite, Inc.*v. *United States*(42 C. C. P. A. 207, C. A. D. 595), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 99.2

           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SUBSECTION 1350
              AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SUBSECTION 906 OF THE
                       SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Stephen A. Garcia, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Universal
Broadband Communications, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary
to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this annual report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this annual report, fairly present in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
annual report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and
have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its
consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is
being prepared;

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of
this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our
evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the
registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
controls; and

6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in
this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in
internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,
including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies
and material weaknesses.

Date: December 5, 2002
                          /s/ Stephen A. Garcia
                          ---------------------
                            Stephen A. Garcia
                         Chief Financial Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES

 v.

STEVEN A. VAUGHN

: 

:

: CRIMINAL NO. 04-CR-611

:

:

ORDER

AND NOW, this 3rd day of August, 2005, upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion for

Amendment of Surrender (docket no. 245), it is ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. It

is FURTHER ORDERED that the criminal judgment entered against Defendant on July 11,

2005 is AMENDED to allow Defendant to surrender and begin serving his sentence on August

22, 2005, no later than 2:00 p.m. 

BY THE COURT:

S/Bruce W. Kauffman 

BRUCE W. KAUFFMAN, J.

Case 2:04-cr-00611-MMB Document 246 Filed 08/04/05 Page 1 of 1
No. 56295.

protests 152593-K, etc. (Ogdensburg).

#### Railway Express Agency, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of turn or turned boots and shoes similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Railway Express Agency, Inc.*v. *United States*(27 Cust. Ct. 91, C. D. 1353), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Exhibit-32.1 -- Certification per Sarbanes-Oxley Act (Section 906)

The undersigned, Tommy J. Gropp, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, of Shiprock, Inc. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)  the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the year ended
     December 31, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
     Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15
     U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d); and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
     Company.

Dated:  March 11, 2004

                                           /s/ Tommy J. Gropp
                                           ------------------------
                                               Tommy J. Gropp
                                               Chief Executive Officer
                                               Chief Financial Officer
Order entered June 25, 2013

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00412-CV

PINE CREEK MEDICAL CENTER, Appellant

V.

MARGARET HIGHTOWER, Appellee

On Appeal from the 95th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-12-06105-D

ORDER

We REINSTATE this appeal. 

Before the Court is the parties’ June 19, 2013 agreed motion to continue abatement of 

this accelerated appeal. The parties ask that the Court abate this appeal for 120 days while 

appellant attempts to settle with a defendant who is not a party to this appeal. The parties inform 

us that if appellant settles with that defendant, appellant and appellee will likely dismiss this 

appeal. We DENY the parties’ June 19, 2013 agreed motion to continue abatement of this 

accelerated appeal. Appellee’s brief is due on or before Monday, July 15, 2013.

/s/ CAROLYN WRIGHT

CHIEF JUSTICE
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

   Schedule of Year-To-Date Principal and Interest Distributions
                           to
                  Certificateholders
                                                                              Ending
Class                   Interest             Principal      Losses           Balance
<S>                     <C>                  <C>            <C>              <C>
A1A                    1,214,540.25         970,110.19         0.00        209,339,889.81
A1B                    4,723,105.72               0.00         0.00        789,377,000.00
A2                       316,025.50               0.00         0.00         51,596,000.00
A3                       362,793.75               0.00         0.00         58,047,000.00
A4                       102,118.67               0.00         0.00         16,124,000.00
B1                       106,821.50               0.00         0.00         16,124,000.00
B2                       171,986.67               0.00         0.00         25,798,000.00
B3                        88,551.13               0.00         0.00         12,899,000.00
B4                       184,175.62               0.00         0.00         33,861,000.00
B5                        96,469.06               0.00         0.00         17,736,000.00
B6                        52,618.50               0.00         0.00          9,674,000.00
B7                        52,623.94               0.00         0.00          9,675,000.00
B8                        87,701.12               0.00         0.00         16,124,000.00
B9                        35,077.19               0.00         0.00          6,449,000.00
C                         87,705.32               0.00         0.00         16,124,771.00
D                              0.00               0.00         0.00                  0.00
E                              0.00               0.00         0.00                  0.00
R                              0.00               0.00         0.00                  0.00
S                      1,172,928.04               0.00         0.00                  0.00
</TABLE>
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: February 1, 2006
    By:
    /s/ Charles P. HuffmanCharles P. HuffmanSenior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
# C_2016191EN.01002001.xml

| 30.5.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 191/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.5.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 191/20

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Korkein oikeus (Finland) lodged on 29 March 2016 — Hannele Hälvä, Sari Naukkarinen, Pirjo Paajanen, Satu Piik v SOS-Lapsikylä ry

(Case C-175/16)

(2016/C 191/24)

Language of the case: Finnish

Referring court

Referring court

Korkein oikeus

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellants: Hannele Hälvä, Sari Naukkarinen, Pirjo Paajanen, Satu Piik

Appellants:

Respondent: SOS-Lapsikylä ry

Respondent:

Question referred

Question referred

Must Article 17(1) of Directive 2003/88/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time be interpreted as including within its scope an activity, as described above, performed in a children’s home in which the worker acts as the representative of foster parents of children in care on the parents’ days off, lives during this period with the children in a family-like setting and during this time independently attends equally to the children’s and family’s needs, as parents generally do?

1

---

(1)  OJ 2003 L 299, p. 9.

1

---
Payment Collection RIA SIA Zero Dollar Total

September 2016 32,215 113,793 4,597 194 1 150,800

October 2016 21,822 73,149 2,705 76 - 97,752

November 2016 22,352 71,038 3,206 78 - 96,674

Totals 76,389 257,980 10,508 348 1 345,226

 -

 50,000

 100,000

 150,000

 200,000

 250,000

 300,000

 350,000

 400,000

# of transactions

Transaction Type

IPAC Transaction Count

September 2016

October 2016

November 2016

Totals
WJ pace:

IPAC Operational Metrics for May 2019

Volume by Transaction Type

Dollar Amount] % of Total Dollar Number of Transactions] % of Total Number of Transactions|
Fiduciary (Investment & Borrowing) 10,172,225,615,524| 99.37%| 14,880] 12.1686
Buy/Sell 56,812,352,959| 055%| 106,199] 36.79%
Benefits (RITS) 7,552,689,323] 0.07%| 459] 038%
[Check Aftermath (TRACS) 89,937,803] 0.00%| 827] 0.68%
Zero Dollar d 0.00%| 4 0.00%
[Grand Total - May 2019 10,236,680,595,609| 100.0056| 122,368] 100.00%|

[Grand Total - April 2019

[April to May Change

Percentage Change

|Grand Total - May 2018

[May 2018 to May 2019 Change

Percentage Change
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

: CIVIL ACTION NOS.

:

WALKER : 02-3868

SIMON : 02-3887

GOTO : 02-3922

JOHNSON, et al. : 02-3932

HOSOKAWA : 02-3959

KILCY : 02-3964

BYRON : 02-4108

ROCHA, et al. : 02-4121

CAVITT : 02-4139

HIBMA-CANARIO, et al. : 02-4152

BAILEY, et al. : 02-4188

BOSSI, et al. : 02-4234

STEINHAUER, et al. : 02-4257

SKEELS, et al. : 02-4274

WALKER, et al. : 02-4279

FRIEDEN, et al. : 02-4310

DIMANLANTA : 02-4313

:

:

VS. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION, et al. :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of July, 2002, the Court having been previously

advised that the above action cannot proceed to trial and disposition because of the following

reason:

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending disposition of a related

action.

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending determination of

arbitration proceedings.

[ ] - Interlocutory appeal filed.

Case 2:02-cv-04108-RBS Document 2 Filed 07/11/2002 Page 1 of 2
[ X ] - Other: Case is placed into suspense pending receipt of the Case

Transfer Order from the Judicial Panel on Multi District Litigation

transferring case to District of Minnesota..

It is

ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this action closed for statistical purposes and

place the matter in the Civil Suspense File, and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction; and that the case be

restored to the trial docket when the action is in a status so that it may proceed to final

disposition; this order shall not prejudice the rights of the parties to this litigation.

BY THE COURT:

________________________________________

R. Barclay Surrick

Case 2:02-cv-04108-RBS Document 2 Filed 07/11/2002 Page 2 of 2