alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MARIANNE and GORDON DAHL :

: CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-CV-4239

Plaintiffs, :

:

v. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION;

BAYER AG;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE;

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM

:

:

:

:

:

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

:

Defendants. :

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of the Court:

Kindly enter the appearances of Hope S. Freiwald, Aline Fairweather, Erin

Brennan and Kirstin J. Miller as attorneys for defendant SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a

GlaxoSmithKline.

Respectfully Submitted,

_____________________________ _____________________________

Hope S. Freiwald Aline Fairweather

_____________________________ _____________________________

Erin Brennan Kirstin J. Miller

DECHERT PRICE & RHOADS

4000 Bell Atlantic Tower

1717 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2793

(215) 994-4000

Case 2:02-cv-04239-CN Document 8 Filed 09/20/2002 Page 1 of 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

BRYANT LAMONT MCCASKILL,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 123 MM 2017

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 31st day of October

, 2017, the Application to File a Petition for

Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DENIED.
June 2018 IPAC Dashboard

Volume by Transaction Type

Dollar Amount % of Total Dollar Amount Number of Transactions] % of Total Number of Transactions|
Fiduciary (Investment & Borrowing) 17,039,239,937,893 99.55% 14,298] 12.28%
Buy/Sell 169,400,836 339] 0.41% 100,732] 86.55%
Benefits (RITS) 7,285,388,305| 0.04% 470) 0.40%
[check Aftermath (TRACS) 114,559,480) 0.00% 389 0.76%
Zero Dollar Q 0.00% 2 0.00%
[Grand Total - June 2018 17,116,040,722,017| 10.00% 116,394) 10.00%
[Grand Total - May 2018 17,125,251,335,130| 10.00% 113,273 10.00%
May to June Change -9,210,613,113| ee)
Percentage Change 0.15 p28]

9,385,564,140,626 [19,643
liune 2017 to June 2018 Change 7,730,476,581,391| ; 5,250]
Percentage Change 82.4% [2.296
Before the Second Division,

March 20, 1958

No. 61707.

#### Barr Shipping Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 306086-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protest was dismissed.
No. 60727.

#### Glensder Textile Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 281689-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silk scarves of squares similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *The Specialty House, Inc., Bryant & Hefernan, Inc., et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 136, C. A. D. 585), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Exhibit 99.1














Buenos
Aires September 4th, 2020


IRSA
Propiedades Comerciales S.A.


Moreno
877, 22nd
Floor


(C10191AAQ)


Buenos
Aires, Argentina








CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT APPRAISER








Newmark
Grubb Knight Frank (“NGKF”) hereby consents to the
reference to NGFK’s name, valuation methodologies,
assumptions and value conclusions for accounting purposes, with
respect to its appraisal reports addressed and previously delivered
to the board of directors of IRSA Propiedads Comerciales S.A. (the
“Company”), in the Company’s Annual Report on
Form 20-F (together with any amendments thereto, the “Annual
Report”) to be filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission. NGKF also hereby consents to the filing of this letter
as an exhibit to the Annual Report.








NEWMARK
GRUBB KNIGHT


FRANK





By:
/s/  Domingo
SperanzaName:
Domingo Speranza
Title:
CEO – Executive Director
# C_2017374EN.01000601.xml

| 6.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 374/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 374/6

---

Judgment of the Court of Justice (Tenth Chamber) of 7 September 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Hannover — Germany) — Heike Schottelius v Falk Seifert

(Case C-247/16) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Consumer protection - Directive 1999/44/EC - Sale of consumer goods and associated guarantees - Notion of ‘contract of sale’ - Inapplicability of that directive - Lack of jurisdiction of the Court))

(2017/C 374/08)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Landgericht Hannover

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Heike Schottelius

Applicant:

Defendant: Falk Seifert

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court of Justice of the European Union does not have jurisdiction to answer the question referred for a preliminary ruling by the Landgericht Hannover (Hanover Regional Court, Germany) by decision of 22 April 2016.

---

(1)  OJ C 279, 1.8.2016.

1

---
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO SECTION 906**

**OFTHE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofJ.Crew Group, Inc. and J.Crew Operating Corp. (collectively, the “Company”)on Form 10-Q for the period ended April 30, 2005 (the “Report”),Millard S. Drexler, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of theCompany, and Nicholas Lamberti, Vice-President, Corporate Controller and ActingChief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,that, to the best of their knowledge:

 

1.                         TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                        Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: June 14, 2005                                                                   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                                        |
| /s/ Millard S. Drexler                                                                      |   |
| Millard S. Drexler  Chairman of the Board and  Chief Executive Officer                      |
|                                                                                        |
|                                                                                        |
| /s/ Nicholas Lamberti                                                                       |   |
| Nicholas Lamberti  Vice-President, Corporate Controller and  Acting Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) and is notbeing filed as part of the Report of as a separate disclosure document.

 

*A signed original of this written statementrequired by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will beretained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.*

 

----
August 22, 1951

No. 55835.

#### Davies Turner & Co. *v.*United States,

protest 134164-K.

Plaintiff’s application for rehearing denied.
No. 63542.

protests 59/1472, etc. (New York).

#### Ardalt, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5(b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protests were dismissed for lack of prosecution.
Exhibit
      99.4


**COMMENTS
        BY INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS ON CANADA-**
 **UNITED
        STATES OF AMERICA REPORTING DIFFERENCES**
 
 The
        standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)
        require the addition of an explanatory paragraph (following the opinion
        paragraph) when there are changes in accounting principles that have been
        implemented in the financial statements, such as the changes described in
        Note 2
        to the consolidated financial statements of Enerplus Resources Fund. Our
        report
        to the unitholders dated February 18, 2006 is expressed in accordance with
        Canadian reporting standards, which do not require a reference to such changes
        in accounting principles in the Report of Independent Registered Chartered
        Accountants when the changes are properly accounted for and adequately disclosed
        in the financial statements.
 
 
 /s/
        Deloitte & Touche LLP
 Independent
        Registered Chartered Accountants
 Calgary,
        Alberta, Canada
 
 February
        18, 2006
No. 64785.

#### Ebeling & Reuss Company *v.*United States,

protests 59/31659 and 59/31664 (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Oliver, O. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of artistic glass articles the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Ebeling & Reuss Co.*v. *United States*(40 Cust. Ct. 387, C.D. 2009), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Case 2:04-cv-03860-JS Document 80 Filed 10/19/05 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:04-cv-03860-JS Document 80 Filed 10/19/05 Page 2 of 2
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.  No. 03-4232

JOSEPH A. MANN,

Defendant-Appellant. 

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.

Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge.

(CR-02-156)

Submitted: September 9, 2003

Decided: September 25, 2003

Before WILKINSON, WILLIAMS, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

COUNSEL

Thomas P. McNamara, Federal Public Defender, Stephen C. Gordon,

Assistant Federal Public Defender, Raleigh, North Carolina, for

Appellant. Frank D. Whitney, United States Attorney, Anne M.

Hayes, Assistant United States Attorney, Christine Witcover Dean,

Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See

Local Rule 36(c). 

OPINION

PER CURIAM: 

Joseph Mann appeals his convictions and sentences for interference

with interstate commerce by means of robbery, in violation of the

Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (2000) ("the Hobbs Act"), and brandishing a firearm during and in relation to a crime of violence, in violation

of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A) (2000). 

On appeal, Mann asserts his conviction under the Hobbs Act was

unconstitutional because the Government was required to prove his

actions had an impact on interstate commerce that was substantial, but

failed to do so. Accordingly, he asserts his robbery conviction cannot

stand, and his conviction for brandishing a firearm during the robbery

cannot stand. We review these claims de novo. United States v. Sun,

278 F.3d 302, 308 (4th Cir. 2002). Mann’s claims are meritless. The

Hobbs Act contains a jurisdictional element requiring a case-by-case

determination regarding whether the defendant’s conduct impacted

interstate commerce. Thus, the Government must prove, as it did here,

that the defendant’s actions impacted interstate commerce, not that

the impact was substantial. See 18 U.S.C. § 1951(a) (2000); United

States v. Williams, No. 02-4344, ___ F.3d ___, 2003 WL 22038949,

at **3 (4th Cir. Aug. 29, 2003); United States v. Bailey, 990 F.2d 119,

125 (4th Cir. 1993); United States v. Brantley, 777 F.2d 159, 162 (4th

Cir. 1985); see also United States v. Morrison, 529 U.S. 598, 613

(2000); Jones v. United States, 529 U.S. 848, 856 (2000); United

States v. Lopez, 514 U.S. 549, 561 (1995). Consequently, Mann establishes no error in his convictions under 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (2000) and

18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(1)(A) (2000). 

Accordingly, we affirm Mann’s convictions and sentences. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid in the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

2 UNITED STATES v. MANN
EXHIBIT 13.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with this Amendment to the Annual Report for Fiscal 2009 Ended August 31, 2009 of Golden Goliath Resources Ltd., company organized under the British Columbia Corporations Act(the Company) on Form 20-F as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Stephen Pearce, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Stephen Pearce

Stephen Pearce, Chief Financial Officer





Date: March 4, 2010
# C_2016222EN.01000501.xml

| 20.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 222/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 222/5

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht (Germany) lodged on 5 April 2016 — Werner Fries v Lufthansa CityLine GmbH

(Case C-190/16)

(2016/C 222/06)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Bundesarbeitsgericht

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Werner Fries

Defendant: Lufthansa CityLine GmbH

Questions referred

| 1. | Is FCL.065(b) in Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 1178/2011 (1) compatible with the prohibition of discrimination on grounds of age under Article 21(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (‘the Charter’)? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Is FCL.065(b) in Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 1178/2011 (1) compatible with the prohibition of discrimination on grounds of age under Article 21(1) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (‘the Charter’)?

| 2. | Is FCL.065(b) in Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 1178/2011 compatible with Article 15(1) of the Charter, according to which everyone has the right to engage in work and to pursue a freely chosen or accepted occupation? |
| --- | --- |

2.

Is FCL.065(b) in Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 1178/2011 compatible with Article 15(1) of the Charter, according to which everyone has the right to engage in work and to pursue a freely chosen or accepted occupation?

| 3. | If the first and second questions are answered in the affirmative:






  (a) | Are so-called ferry flights operated by an air carrier transporting no passengers and no cargo or mail also covered by the term ‘commercial air transport’ within the meaning of FCL.065(b) or the definition of that term in FCL.010 in Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 1178/2011? |
| --- | --- | --- |

3.

If the first and second questions are answered in the affirmative:

(a)

Are so-called ferry flights operated by an air carrier transporting no passengers and no cargo or mail also covered by the term ‘commercial air transport’ within the meaning of FCL.065(b) or the definition of that term in FCL.010 in Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 1178/2011?

| (b) | Are training and the conducting of exams in which a pilot over the age of 65 remains in the cockpit of the aircraft as a non-flying crew member covered by the term ‘commercial air transport’ within the meaning of FCL.065(b) or the definition of that term in FCL.010 in Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 1178/2011? |
| --- | --- |

(b)

Are training and the conducting of exams in which a pilot over the age of 65 remains in the cockpit of the aircraft as a non-flying crew member covered by the term ‘commercial air transport’ within the meaning of FCL.065(b) or the definition of that term in FCL.010 in Annex I to Regulation (EU) No 1178/2011?

---

(1)  Commission Regulation (EU) No 1178/2011 of 3 November 2011 laying down technical requirements and administrative procedures related to civil aviation aircrew pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ 2011 L 311, p. 1).

---
June 2020 

ALC Contact Information 

Have you ever needed to get in touch with the “right” person at another Federal Program Agency, but 

didn’t know where to start looking? The Shared Accounting Module (SAM) offers a Contact List within 

the SAM website with one contact person for every Agency Location Code (ALC). This contact should 

be the main Classification Transactions & Accountability (CTA) / SF 224 point of contact, and direct you 

to the appropriate IPAC resource. 

To view your current ALC Contact Information, you may navigate to the “Agency Setup” tab of the IPAC 

website, and enter your ALC. To view the current ALC Contact file, login to the Shared Accounting 

Module (SAM) website with your Single-Sign On ID. Select Reports from the Navigation Menu, and then 

select Reference Data. You may then Download the ALC Contact File for All Agencies, and search for 

the agency information you need. 

You may have been one of the several IPAC users who have experienced issues in which they have 

needed to contact a separate ALC to resolve an IPAC or another Fund Balance with Treasury accounting 

issue. Users have noted that many agencies have not kept an updated listing of their user contacts with 

SAM, making it difficult to resolve issues with the correct point of contact, or reaching an agency contact 

at all. 

We highly recommend agencies check the SAM ALC Contact File and provide the most up-to date 

contact information if changes are necessary. Your agency’s contact information should be updated with 

any employee or location changes, or at least on an annual basis. Not providing the most up-to-date 

contact information could create problems for multiple agencies during month-end reporting with cash 

reconciliations and financial reporting or prevent other agencies from working with the most appropriate 

individuals within your agency. 
 June 2020 

In order to update the contact information on the SAM ALC Listing, contact the Bureau of Fiscal 

Service parties as follows: 

4‐digit ALC 

To request a contact change for a 4‐digit ALC, the appropriate agency official from the 

agency's administrative office should sign and email a formal request to Fiscal Service. 

Please direct the request to Shawn King (shawn.king@fiscal.treasury.gov) and Bruce Phillips 

(bruce.phillips@fiscal.treasury.gov). 

8‐digit ALC 

To request a contact change for an 8‐digit ALC, the appropriate agency official from the 

agency's administrative office should sign and email a formal request to Fiscal Service. 

Please direct the request to the Cash Analysis Section 

(CashAnalysisSection.FAO@fiscal.treasury.gov). 

Please note that this SAM ALC contact list is intended for audiences of several governmentwide 

system applications, so it should list one agency contact who is the most capable of directing a range 

of requests to the appropriate individual within their organization.
MEMORANDUM 

From: Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards 

 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 

To: EGU NSPS Docket (EPA-HQ-OAR-2013-0495) 

Date: August, 2015 

Subject: Costing Analysis for Partial CCS 

Update for final rule 

The EPA updated the partial CCS costs using the latest information available from the DOE. 

Specifically, the EPA used information from “Cost and Performance Baseline for Fossil Energy Plants 

Supplement: Sensitivity to CO2 Capture Rate in Coal-Fired Power Plants, June 22, 2015 (DOE/NETL2015/1720). The spreadsheet is attached. 

Sources of Information 

Figure 1 shows the 3 primary sources of information for estimating the cost and performance of 

technologies for the proposed GHG standards. 

Figure 1: Sources of Cost and Performance Information 

Document Primary use 

Cost and Performance Baseline for Fossil Energy 

Plants, Volume 1: Bituminous Coal and Natural Gas to 

Electricity, Revision 1, August 2007 (DOE/NETL2007/1281) 

Baseline technology performance and costs 

Cost and Performance Baseline for Fossil Energy 

Plants Volume 1: Bituminous Coal and Natural Gas to 

Electricity, Revision 2, November 2010 

(DOE/NETL-2010/1397) 

Update technology costs 

Cost and Performance of PC and IGCC Plants for a 

Range of Carbon Dioxide Capture, May 27, 2011 

(DOE/NETL-2011/1498) 

Estimate cost and performance of partial CCS 

Table 8.2 Cost and Performance Characteristics of 

New Central Station Electricity Generating 

Technologies, Annual Energy Outlook 2013 Early 

Release (Energy Information Administration) 

Comparison of relative costs of simple and 

combined cycle technologies 

The 2007 NETL report is the primary source of technology cost and performance data used for the 

proposal. However, capital, variable, and fixed operating costs and CO2 transmission, storage, and 

monitoring (TS&M) costs were updated using the cost information in the 2010 NETL report. To 

estimate the costs and performance for partial carbon capture and storage (CCS), we used the partial 

capture costs in the 2011 NETL report. The attached Excel file includes the detailed calculations. 

Costing Approach 
The capital, fixed, and variable costs are essentially linear in the 2011 NETL report. The partial costing 

analysis scales these costs linearly with the percent carbon capture. We also scaled the water use, risk 

premium, net power output, and efficiency using a linear relationship. To estimate the CO2 TS&M costs, 

we used a linear fit to NETL partial capture case and adjusted the costs to match the 90% capture costs. 

The impact of this is that there is a certain fixed cost for small amounts of capture and the relative costs 

on a $/ton basis of captured CO2 decrease with increased levels of capture. Finally, for the pulverized 

coal case, we removed the 3% climate uncertainty adder entirely for both the partial and full capture 

cases.
No. 57206.

protest 186748-K (New York).

#### American B D Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the facts and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, were not in fact received by the importer. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited it was held that duty and internal revenue tax are not assessable upon such portions of the merchandise as were reported by the inspector as manifested, not found. The protest was sustained to this extent.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

WM HIGH YIELD FUND, et al. : CIVIL ACTION 

:

v. :

: No. 04-3423

MICHAEL A. O’HANLON, et al. :

ORDER 

AND NOW, this 12th day of August 2013, upon consideration of the parties’

submissions, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant Gerald Cohn’s Motion for Summary 1

Judgment (Doc. Nos. 257, 257-1) is GRANTED, and it is further ORDERED that JUDGMENT

is entered in favor of Defendant Cohn and against Plaintiffs – WM High Yield Fund; WM

Income Fund; WM VT Income Fund; AT High Yield Fund; AT Income Fund; and Stellar

Funding, Ltd. – on all claims contained in the Complaint. 

BY THE COURT: 

/s/ Legrome D. Davis

Legrome D. Davis, J. 

Defendant Gerald Cohn’s submissions: Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. Nos. 257, 257-1), 1

Statement of Undisputed Facts (Doc. No. 257-2), Affidavit of Julian W. Friedman (Doc. No. 257-3) with

Exhibits A-BB (Doc. Nos. 257-4 through 257-12), Memorandum of Law (Doc. No. 257-13), and Reply Brief

(Doc. No. 279). Plaintiffs’ submissions: Memorandum of Law (Doc. No. 272), Counter-Statement of

Undisputed Facts (Doc. No. 273), Declaration of James P. McEvilly, III (Doc. No. 274) with Exhibits 1-4

(Doc. Nos. 274-1 through 274-3).