alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 12261]

# SUMMARY:

                        Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I hereby determine that certain objects being imported from abroad pursuant to agreements with their foreign owners or custodians for temporary display in the exhibition “Crafting Modernity: Design in Latin America, 1940-1980” at The Museum of Modern Art, New York, New York, and at possible additional exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, are of cultural significance, and, further, that their temporary exhibition or display within the United States as aforementioned is in the national interest. I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Reed Liriano, Program Coordinator, Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-632-6471; email:                         *section2459@state.gov*). The mailing address is U.S. Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, Washington, DC 20522-0505.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The foregoing determinations were made pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681,                     *et seq.;*22 U.S.C. 6501 note,                     *et seq.*), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 523 of December 22, 2021.                

Nicole L. Elkon,

Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2023-25004 Filed 11-13-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-05-P
### Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,
Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanag h Marilyn Kell y Stephen J. Markma n Diane M. Hathawa y Mary Beth Kell y Brian K. Zahra,
J ustices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

_______________________________________ __ Clerk March 5, 2012

h0227 

# Order

March 5, 2012

143969

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v SC: 143969 COA: 298381 PARIS DEMOND CAGE, Oakland CC: 2009-228954-FC Defendant-Appellant.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application fo r leave to appeal the September 27, 2011 judgment of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
GSDM IDD v1.1: File E - Additional Awardee Attrib

Awardee (UEI and Address 

Information)

Awardee Or Recipient UEIAwardee or Recipient Legal Entity NameUltimate Parent UEIUltimate Parent Legal Entity Name

Awardee (Executive 

Compensation Information)

Highly Compensated Officer 1

Highly Compensated Officer Full Name 1

Highly Compensated Officer Amount 1

Highly Compensated Officer 2

Highly Compensated Officer Full Name 2

Highly Compensated Officer Amount 2

Highly Compensated Officer 3

Highly Compensated Officer Full Name 3

Highly Compensated Officer Amount 3

Highly Compensated Officer 4

Highly Compensated Officer Full Name 4

Highly Compensated Officer Amount 4

Highly Compensated Officer 5

Highly Compensated Officer Full Name 5

Highly Compensated Officer Amount 5

Legend

Identifying Eleme

Attribute

Amount

Conceptual Model Co
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-2318

SARA ABRAM,

Petitioner,

versus

JOHN ASHCROFT, U.S. Attorney General; WARREN

A. LEWIS, INS District Director,

Respondents.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration

Appeals. (A78-340-234)

Submitted: April 12, 2004 Decided: May 14, 2004

Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael M. Hadeed, Jr., BECKER, HADEED, KELLOGG & BERRY, P.C.,

Springfield, Virginia, for Petitioner. Peter D. Keisler, Assistant

Attorney General, Terri J. Scadron, Assistant Director, Hillel R.

Smith, OFFICE OF IMMIGRATION LITIGATION, Washington, D.C., for

Respondents.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Sara Abram, a citizen of Ethiopia, petitions for review

of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“Board”)

affirming, without opinion, the immigration judge’s denial of her

applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection

under the Convention Against Torture.

On appeal, Abram raises challenges to the immigration

judge’s determination that she failed to establish her eligibility

for asylum. To obtain reversal of a determination denying

eligibility for relief, an alien “must show that the evidence [s]he

presented was so compelling that no reasonable factfinder could

fail to find the requisite fear of persecution.” INS v.

Elias-Zacarias, 502 U.S. 478, 483-84 (1992). We have reviewed the

evidence of record and conclude that Abram fails to show that the

evidence compels a contrary result. Accordingly, we cannot grant

the relief that she seeks.

Additionally, we uphold the immigration judge’s denial of

Abram’s request for withholding of removal. The standard for

withholding of removal is more stringent than that for granting

asylum. Chen v. INS, 195 F.3d 198, 205 (4th Cir. 1999). To

qualify for withholding of removal, an applicant must demonstrate

“a clear probability of persecution.” INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca, 480

U.S. 421, 430 (1987). Because Abram fails to show that she is
- 3 -

eligible for asylum, she cannot meet the higher standard for

withholding of removal.

Accordingly, we deny the petition for review. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITION DENIED
January 2011 to January 2012 Schedule 

For Treasury-Disbursed Recurring Benefit Payments 

Settlement Dates 

Agency Jan’11 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct 

OPM Office of Personnel Management Civil Service Retirement/Annuity 

1/3** 2/1 3/1 4/1 5/2** 6/1 7/1 8/1 9/1 10/3*

RRB Railroad Retirement Board Railroad Retirement/Annuity 

1/3** 2/1 3/1 4/1 5/2** 6/1 7/1 8/1 9/1 10/3*

VA Department of Veterans Affairs Compensation and Pension 

12/31* 2/1 3/1 4/1 4/29* 6/1 7/1 8/1 9/1 9/30* 

SSA Social Security Administration 3rd of Month 

1/3 2/3 3/3 4/1* 5/3 6/3 7/1* 8/3 9/2* 10/3 

SSA Cycle -2

 2nd Wednesday 

1/12 2/9 3/9 4/13 5/11 6/8 7/13 8/10 9/14 10/12 

SSA Cycle -3 3rd Wednesday 

1/19 2/16 3/16 4/20 5/18 6/15 7/20 8/17 9/21 10/19 

SSA Cycle -4 4th Wednesday 

1/26 2/23 3/23 4/27 5/25 6/22 7/27 8/24 9/28 10/26 

SSI Supplemental Security Income 

12/31* 2/1 3/1 4/1 4/29* 6/1 7/1 8/1 9/1 9/30* 

. * = Settlement Date Adjusted to the Preceding Business Day ** = Settlement Date Adjusted to the Following Business Day 

Prepared by the U. S. Department of the Treasury/Fina
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, John D. Hellmann, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Shoe Pavilion, Inc. for the period ended October 2, 2004; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us by others within that entity, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of October 2, 2004, based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 15, 2004
No. 56331.

protest 175155-K (New York).

#### Zado Goldenberg & Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

The protest was dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of Integrated Healthcare Holdings,
Inc. (the  "Company") on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended  September 30, 2004, as
filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange   Commission  (the  "Report"),   the
undersigned,  in the capacity and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      1.    the Report fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    the  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects,  the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company at the dates and for the period indicated.

      This  Certificate has not been, and shall not be deemed,  "filed" with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.


      Dated: May 23, 2005               By: /s/ Bruce Mogel
                                            ------------------------------------
                                            Bruce Mogel
                                            Chief Executive Officer
No. 49559.

#### Protest 37373-K of Kraft Phenix Cheese Corp. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that the cheese in question is similar to that- the subject of Abstracts 42146, 42309, and 42178. The protest was therefore sustained to this extent.
No. 50855.

#### Protests 891951-G, etc., of Biddle Purchasing Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Exhibit 31.1

           Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

I, David S. Ahl, certify that:

1.  I  have  reviewed  this  Annual  Report  on  Form  10-KSB  of  Sunshine  PCS
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact  necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the  circumstances  under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.  Based  on my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other  financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial  condition,  results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.  The  registrant's  other  certifying  officer  and  I  are  responsible  for
establishing and maintaining  disclosure  controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     (a)  Designed  such  disclosure  controls  and  procedures,  or caused such
disclosure  controls and  procedures to be designed  under our  supervision,  to
ensure that  material  information  relating to the  registrant,  including  its
consolidated subsidiaries,  is made known to us by others within those entities,
particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions  about the effectiveness
of the disclosure  controls and procedures,  as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c)  Disclosed  in this  report  any  change in the  registrant's  internal
control over financial  reporting  that occurred  during the  registrant's  most
recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's  fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an
annual  report)  that  has  materially  affected,  or is  reasonably  likely  to
materially affect, the registrant's  internal control over financial  reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,  based on our
most recent  evaluation of internal  control over  financial  reporting,  to the
registrant's  auditors  and the audit  committee  of the  registrant's  board of
directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a) All significant  deficiencies and material  weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal  control over  financial  reporting  which are  reasonably
likely  to  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to  record,  process,
summarize and report financial information; and

     (b) Any fraud,  whether or not material,  that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's  internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: March 31, 2005


/s/ David S. Ahl
----------------
David S. Ahl
Chief Executive Officer
# C_2015198EN.01004602.xml

| 15.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 198/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 198/46

---

Action brought on 23 April 2015 — Aldi v OHIM — Miquel Alimentació Grup (Gourmet)

(Case T-212/15)

(2015/C 198/64)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Aldi GmbH & Co. KG (Mülheim an der Ruhr, Germany) (represented by: C. Fürsen, N. Lützenrath, U. Rademacher and N. Bertram, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Miquel Alimentació Grup, SA (Vilamalla, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark including the word element ‘Gourmet’ — Application No 9 310 269

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before OHIM

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 24 February 2015 in Case R 314/2014-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
# C_2019263EN.01003801.xml

| 5.8.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 263/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.8.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 263/38

---

Judgment of the General Court of 11 June 2019 — Frank v Commission

(Case T-478/16) (1)

(Research and technological development - Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014-2020) - Calls for proposals and related activities under the ERC Work Programme for the year 2016 - ERCEA decision rejecting a grant application as ineligible - Administrative appeal before the Commission - Implied rejection decision - Inadmissible in part - Express rejection decision - Right to effective judicial protection)

(2019/C 263/42)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Regine Frank (Bonn, Germany) (represented by: S. Conrad, lawyer)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: R. Lyal, L. Mantl and B. Conte, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application brought under Article 270 TFEU, seeking annulment, first, of the Commission’s decision of 17 June 2016 and, secondly, of the Commission’s decision of 16 September 2016, which respectively rejected, implicitly and explicitly, the applicant’s administrative appeal pursuant to Article 22(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 58/2003 of 19 December 2002 laying down the statute for executive agencies to be entrusted with certain tasks in the management of Community programmes (OJ 2003 L 11, p. 1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders each party to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders each party to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 475, 19.12.2016.

---
EXHIBIT 32.1

THE FOLLOWING CERTIFICATION IS PROVIDED BY THE UNDERSIGNED CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF MIDWEST BANC HOLDINGS, INC. ON THE BASIS
OF SUCH OFFICER'S KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF COMPLYING WITH 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002.

                                  CERTIFICATION
                                  -------------

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Midwest Banc Holdings, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 12, 2003 (the "Report"), the
undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
                  amended; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


                                                  /s/Brad A. Luecke
                                              ---------------------------------
                                              Name: Brad A. Luecke
                                              Title:President and
                                                    Chief Executive Officer
                                              Date: November 12, 2003


                                                  /s/Daniel R. Kadolph
                                              ---------------------------------
                                              Name: Daniel R. Kadolph
                                              Title:Senior Vice President and
                                                    Chief Financial Officer
                                              Date: November 12, 2003







         A SIGNED ORIGINAL OF THIS WRITTEN STATEMENT REQUIRED BY SECTION 906 HAS
BEEN PROVIDED TO THE COMPANY AND WILL BE RETAINED BY THE COMPANY AND FURNISHED
TO THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION UPON REQUEST. THIS CERTIFICATION
ACCOMPANIES THE REPORT AND SHALL NOT BE TREATED AS HAVING BEEN FILED AS PART OF
THE REPORT.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

CHESTER COUNTY HOSPITAL, : NO. 2:02-cv-02746-JRP

Plaintiff :

:

VS. :

:

INDEPENDENCE BLUE CROSS, et al., :

Defendants :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 13th day of November, 2003, upon

consideration of Defendants’ Motion to Compel Paoli Memorial Hospital

(“Paoli”) to Produce Documents and the Response thereto of Paoli, and

upon conducting oral argument, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

1. Within ten (10) days from the date of this Order,

counsel for both defendants’ and for Paoli will meet

and confer regarding the specific documents which

defendants claim have not been produced. Paoli’s

document production will be completed within four (4)

days of its meet and confer session.

2. The deposition of Paoli shall thereafter occur at a

date agreed upon by all parties and the deponent.

Should the deposition reveal that other documents

requested by defendants exist, but were not produced,

Paoli shall appear for a second deposition following

the production of those documents.

3. Paoli shall produce its insurer contracts subject to

the Protective Order, as modified on this date.

It is so ORDERED.

BY THE COURT:

 

 CHARLES B. SMITH

 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 160 Filed 11/13/2003 Page 1 of 1