alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2021206EN.01000401.xml

| 31.5.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 206/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.5.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 206/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 25 March 2021 — Arrow Group ApS, Arrow Generics Ltd v European Commission

(Case C-601/16 P) (1)

(Appeal - Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Pharmaceutical products - Market for antidepressant medicines (citalopram) - Settlement agreements concerning process patents concluded between a manufacturer of originator medicines holding those patents and manufacturers of generic medicines - Article 101 TFEU - Potential competition - Restriction by object - Characterisation - Calculation of the amount of the fine)

(2021/C 206/05)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellants: Arrow Group ApS, Arrow Generics Ltd (represented by: C. Firth, S. Kon and C. Humpe, Solicitors)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: F. Castilla Contreras, T. Vecchi, B. Mongin and C. Vollrath, acting as Agents, and by B. Rayment and D. Bailey, Barristers, and by G. Peretz QC, and S. Kingston, Senior Counsel)

Intervener in support of the European Commission: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented: initially by D. Guðmundsdóttir, Z. Lavery, and D. Robertson, acting as Agents, and by J. Holmes QC, and subsequently by D. Guðmundsdóttir, acting as Agent, and by J. Holmes QC)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Arrow Group ApS and Arrow Generics Ltd to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Arrow Group ApS and Arrow Generics Ltd to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission;

| 3. | Orders the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 30, 30.1.2017.

---
Document

Exhibit 10.48
NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION SCHEDULE 
Overview 
A summary of our annual non-employee director compensation is provided below: 
												
	Annual Equity		$192,000	(1)

	Board Fee		$  78,000	
	Chairman Fee		$180,000	(2)

	Committee Fee		$  15,000	
	Committee Chair Fee		$  10,000	


(1)     Upon being elected or re-elected as a director, each non-employee director receives such number of restricted stock units as is determined by dividing $192,000 by the closing price of our common stock on the grant date.
(2)   The Chairman fee is comprised of (i) $90,000 in cash and (ii) such number of restricted stock units as is determined by dividing $90,000 by the closing price of our common stock on the grant date. The Chairman fee is in addition to the standard Board fee and annual equity grant.
Restricted stock units vest 100% on the earlier of (i) the first anniversary of the grant date or (ii) immediately prior to the first annual meeting of shareholders following the grant date.  
Committee fees are payable with respect to each committee on which a director serves. All cash fees are payable quarterly in arrears. 


Deferred Compensation Plan 
Under our non-employee director deferred compensation plan, each non-employee director may defer up to 100% of his or her cash fees. Based on his or her deferral election, the director is credited with a number of share units at the time he or she would have otherwise received the portion of the fees being deferred. In addition, each non-employee director may defer receipt of up to 100% of shares due upon vesting of restricted stock units, and based on his or her election, the director is credited with one share unit for the receipt of each such share that is deferred. Share units are equivalent to shares of our common stock except that share units have no voting rights. 
Upon cessation of service on the board, the director receives a share of our common stock for each share unit. Directors elect whether the shares are received in a lump sum distribution or in annual installments over two to fifteen years, and any fractional share units are paid in cash. Share units credited to a director’s account are considered awards granted under the Amended and Restated Fiserv, Inc. 2007 Omnibus Incentive Plan and count against that plan’s share reserve.
# C_2018161EN.01000902.xml

| 7.5.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 161/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.5.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 161/9

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 7 March 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nejvyšší soud České republiky — Czech Republic) — E.ON Czech Holding AG v Michael Dědouch, Petr Streitberg, Pavel Suda

(Case C-560/16) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 - Jurisdiction in civil and commercial matters - Exclusive jurisdiction - Article 22(2) - Validity of decisions of the organs of companies or legal persons having their seat in the territory of a Member State - Exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of that Member State - Decision of the general meeting of a company ordering the compulsory transfer to that company’s principal shareholder of the shares held by the company’s minority shareholders and determining the consideration to be paid to them by the principal shareholder - Judicial procedure for reviewing the reasonableness of that consideration))

(2018/C 161/10)

Language of the case: Czech

Referring court

Referring court

Nejvyšší soud České republiky

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: E.ON Czech Holding AG

Applicant:

Defendants: Michael Dědouch, Petr Streitberg, Pavel Suda

Defendants:

Intervener: Jihočeská plynárenská, a.s.

Intervener:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 22(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters must be interpreted as meaning that an action, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, for review of the reasonableness of the consideration that the principal shareholder of a company is required to pay to the minority shareholders of that company in the event of the compulsory transfer of their shares to that principal shareholder comes within the exclusive jurisdiction of the courts of the Member State in which that company is established.

---

(1)  OJ C 22, 23.1.2017.

1

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-7489

NOLAN C. RORIE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

NORTH CAROLINA ATTORNEY GENERAL,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., Chief

District Judge. (CA-97-839-1)

Submitted: February 23, 1999 Decided: April 19, 1999

Before ERVIN, WILKINS, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Nolan C. Rorie, Appellant Pro Se. Clarence Joe DelForge, III,

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Nolan C. Rorie seeks to appeal the district court’s order

denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West

1994 & Supp. 1998). We have reviewed the record and the district

court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate

judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of

the district court. Rorie v. North Carolina Attorney Gen., No. CA97-839-1 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 28, 1998). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------

              SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


     Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, the undersigned officer of GMX Resources
Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that the Company's Annual Report on Form
10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the "Report"), fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

                                          /s/ Ken L. Kenworthy, Jr.
                                          ------------------------------
Date: March 31, 2005                      Name: Ken L. Kenworthy, Jr.
                                          Title: Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>







<PAGE>

<ARTICLE> 5                                             
                                                         
<S>                             <C>                      
<PERIOD-TYPE>                     6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                                  DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                       JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                             244,438,000
<SECURITIES>                                                 0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       58,350,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                                 0
<INVENTORY>                                                  0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   350,396,000
<PP&E>                                             242,245,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                       6,581,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                   1,243,161,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              275,938,000
<BONDS>                                            537,345,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                        0
<PREFERRED>                                                  0
<COMMON>                                               301,000
<OTHER-SE>                                         367,421,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                     1,243,161,000
<SALES>                                                      0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   292,342,000
<CGS>                                                        0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      270,681,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    54,555,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                             0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  18,221,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (47,189,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         1,100,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (48,539,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                              0
<CHANGES>                                                    0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (48,539,000)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                           (2.56)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           (2.56)
                                                         


</TABLE>
# C_2017014EN.01001702.xml

| 16.1.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 14/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.1.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 14/17

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 10 November 2016 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam — Netherlands) — Execution of a European arrest warrant issued against Ruslanas Kovalkovas

(Case C-477/16 PPU) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Urgent preliminary ruling procedure - Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters - European arrest warrant - Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA - Article 1(1) - Concept of ‘judicial decision’ - Article 6(1) - Concept of ‘issuing judicial authority’ - European arrest warrant issued by the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Lithuania with a view to executing a custodial sentence))

(2017/C 014/22)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Rechtbank Amsterdam

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Openbaar Ministerie

Defendant: Ruslanas Kovalkovas

Operative part of the judgment

The term ‘judicial authority’, referred to in Article 6(1) of Council Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between Member States, as amended by Council Framework Decision 2009/299/JHA of 26 February 2009, is an autonomous concept of EU law and that provision must be interpreted as meaning that it precludes an organ of the executive, such as the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Lithuania, from being designated as an ‘issuing judicial authority’, within the meaning of the same Article 6(1), meaning that the European arrest warrant issued by it with a view to executing a judgment imposing a custodial sentence cannot be regarded as a ‘judicial decision’, within the meaning of Article 1(1) of Framework Decision 2002/584, as amended by Framework Decision 2009/299.

---

(1)  
  OJ C 383, 17.10.2016.

---
No. 58901.

protests 240061-K and 239989-K (San Francisco).

#### George Beurhaus & Co. and Hoyt, Shepston & Sciaroni *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of pumpkin seed kernels the same in all material respects as those the subject of *George Beurhaus Co.*and *Hoyt, Shepston & Sciaroni*v. *United States*(32 Cust. Ct. 269, C. D. 1612), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES–OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

 

 

In connection with the QuarterlyReport of National Equipment Services, Inc. (the “Company”) onForm 10-Q for the quarterly period ending September 30, 2003 as filedwith the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),I, F. Duffield Meyercord, Chief Restructuring Officer and Interim ChiefExecutive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to§906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:

 

(1)          The Report fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of1934; and

(2)          The information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.

 
| /s/ F. DUFFIELD MEYERCORD       |   |
|---------------------------------|--------|
|                            |
| F. Duffield Meyercord           |
| Interim Chief Executive Officer |
| April 8, 2004                   |

 

----
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 211 (Thursday, November 2, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75337-75338]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-24149]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail, and USPS 
Ground Advantage[supreg] Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

[[Page 75338]]

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 2, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean C. Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
October 26, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail Express, Priority Mail & USPS Ground 
Advantage[supreg] Contract 11 to Competitive Product List. Documents 
are available at www.prc.gov, Docket Nos. MC2024-27, CP2024-27.

Sean C. Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2023-24149 Filed 11-1-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
EX-10.4




 Exhibit 10.4 

Apache Corporation Non-Qualified Restorative Retirement Savings Plan 

Amendment to Definition of Change of Control 

Apache Corporation (“Apache”) sponsors the Apache Corporation Non-Qualified Restorative Retirement Savings
Plan (the “Plan”). In section 8.02 of the Plan, Apache reserved the right to amend the Plan from time to time. Apache hereby exercises that right as follows, effective March 1, 2021: 

 

	1.	 Section 1.06 (Change of Control) is hereby amended by replacing the word “Apache” with the
phrase “APA Corporation, a Delaware corporation, or its successor”. 


 [Signature Page Follows] 

  
 Page 1 of 1 












 EXECUTED this 1st day of March, 2021. 

 

			
	APACHE CORPORATION
		
	By:	 	/s/ Brandy Jones
		 	 Brandy Jones
 Vice President, Human
Resources




  
 Signature Page to Apache
Corporation Non-Qualified Restorative Retirement Savings Plan 
 Amendment to Definition of Change of Control
<PAGE>   1

                                                                     Exhibit 11

Earnings Per Share

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                   Three months ended                 Six months ended
                                                        June 30,                          June 30,
                                                  2001             2000             2001             2000
                                                --------         --------         --------         --------
<S>                                             <C>              <C>             <C>              <C>
Numerator:
     Net income                                 $448,353         $ 36,174         $525,190         $ 37,210

Denominator:
     Denominator for basic earnings per
         share--weighted-average shares          388,052          320,267          388,052          320,267

     Effect of dilutive securities:
         Nonqualified stock options                7,530            1,057            7,530            1,057
                                                --------         --------         --------         --------
     Denominator for diluted earnings
         per share                               395,582          321,324          395,582          321,324
                                                ========         ========         ========         ========

Basic earnings per share                        $   1.16         $   0.11         $   1.35         $   0.12
                                                ========         ========         ========         ========

Diluted earnings per share                      $   1.13         $   0.11         $   1.33         $   0.12
                                                ========         ========         ========         ========

</TABLE>


                                 Page 19 of 19
Exhibit 32.1

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Vertical branding, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),

We, Nancy Duitch, Chief Executive Officer, and, Victor Brodsky, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|              |                                           
|------------- | ------------------------------------------
|             
|April 9, 2007
|              | /s/ NANCY DUITCH                          
|              | Nancy Duitch                              
|              | Chief Executive Officer                   
|             
|             
|April 9, 2007
|              | /s/ VICTOR BRODSKY                        
|              | Victor Brodsky                            
|              | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
No. 67726.

#### W. H. S. Lloyd Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 62/7905 (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of samples similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Carson M. Simon & Co.*v. *United States*(46 Cust. Ct. 118, C.D. 2243), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

VERNA and JOHN A. MOUSER :

: CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-CV-4271

Plaintiffs, :

:

v. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION;

BAYER AG;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE;

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM

:

:

:

:

:

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

:

Defendants. :

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of the Court:

Kindly enter the appearances of Hope S. Freiwald, Aline Fairweather, Erin

Brennan and Kirstin J. Miller as attorneys for defendant SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a

GlaxoSmithKline.

Respectfully Submitted,

_____________________________ _____________________________

Hope S. Freiwald Aline Fairweather

_____________________________ _____________________________

Erin Brennan Kirstin J. Miller

DECHERT PRICE & RHOADS

4000 Bell Atlantic Tower

1717 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2793

(215) 994-4000

Case 2:02-cv-04271-JG Document 8 Filed 10/02/2002 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

: CIVIL ACTION NOS.

:

WEYANT : 02-3886

GOODMAN : 02-3910

MARRA, et al. : 02-3913

FREDERICKSEN : 02-3948

FRANCIS : 02-3967

SPACCAMONTI : 02-3971

STETZENBACK : 02-3978

CLEMENT, et al. : 02-4031

CLEMENT, et al. : 02-4032

HARCOURT, et al. : 02-4128

WAGE, et al. : 02-4169

NUNNERY, et al. : 02-4173

JOHNSON, et al. : 02-4216

BLAIR, et al. : 02-4223

CASTO, et al. : 02-4228

ZAMBRANO, et al. : 02-4276

FOSS, et al. : 02-4286

BURKE-SHERMAN, et al. : 02-4366

:

VS. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION, et al. :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of July, 2002, the Court having been previously

advised that the above action cannot proceed to trial and disposition because of the following

reason:

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending disposition of a related

action.

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending determination of

arbitration proceedings.

[ ] - Interlocutory appeal filed.

[ X ] - Other: Case is placed into suspense pending receipt of the Case

Transfer Order from the Judicial Panel on Multi District Litigation

transferring the case to the District of Minnesota.

Case 2:02-cv-04128-RB Document 2 Filed 07/10/2002 Page 1 of 2
It is

ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this action closed for statistical purposes and

place the matter in the Civil Suspense File, and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction; and that the case be

restored to the trial docket when the action is in a status so that it may proceed to final

disposition; this order shall not prejudice the rights of the parties to this litigation.

BY THE COURT:

________________________________________

Ronald L. Buckwalter, Judge

Case 2:02-cv-04128-RB Document 2 Filed 07/10/2002 Page 2 of 2