alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 12.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

I, Michael Diekmann,certify that: 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Allianz SE; 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of thecompany as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4. The company’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company andhave: 

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed underour supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; 

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and 

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the company’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

5. The company’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed,based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

(b) Any fraud,whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting. 

Date: March 19, 2008
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MARTHA STEELE : CIVIL ACTION

 :

 vs.

 :

HCI DIRECT : NO. 02-4347

 ORDER

AND NOW, this day of March, 2006, IT IS ORDERED that the Court’s Order

granting Plaintiff’s request for appointment of counsel is hereby VACATED. 

BY THE COURT:

 /s/ Bruce W. Kauffman

_________________________

 BRUCE W. KAUFFMAN, J.

 

Case 2:02-cv-04347-BWK Document 52 Filed 03/07/2006 Page 1 of 1
March 4, 1949

No. 52912.

Suit 4598.

#### United States *v.*W. C. Hardesty Co., Inc.

C. D. 1092 reversed January 5, 1949. C. A. D. 396.
Exhibit 8.
List of Significant Subsidiaries
The following table sets forth our significant direct and indirect subsidiariesas of June 1, 2004:     **Name ofCompany**  Gemplus Card International de Mexico SA de C.V., a Mexican corporation    GemplusCorp., a Delaware (U.S.) corporation    Gemplus Finance SA, a Luxembourg corporation    Gemplus GmbH, a German corporation    Gemplus Limited, a British corporation    Gemplus Japan Co Ltd, a Japanese corporation    Gemplus Microelectronics Asia Pte Limited, a Singapore corporation    Gemplus S.A., a French corporation    Gemplus Tianjin New Technologies Company Limited, a Chinese corporation    Gemplus Pologne S.P.Z.o.o., a Polish corporation    Tianjin Gemplus Smart Card Company Limited, a Chinese corporation
<PAGE>
                                                                 EXHIBIT 10.25
[LOGO]

                              EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


THIS AGREEMENT is made between EXTENDED SYSTEMS INCORPORATED (ESI) and Scott
Ritchie (EMPLOYEE) for the employment of EMPLOYEE by ESI.


IT IS AGREED BETWEEN THE PARTIES:

1.       EMPLOYMENT:  ESI hereby hires EMPLOYEE and EMPLOYEE accepts employment 
         with ESI as V.P. of Operations.

2.       TERMS OF EMPLOYMENT:  This Agreement shall commence the 25th day of 
         November, 1998 and shall continue until terminated by either party 
         pursuant to paragraph five.

3.       COMPENSATION:  The EMPLOYEE shall receive as compensation for his/her
         services the amount of $12,065 per mo. plus all employee benefits as 
         set forth in the current issue of the Extended Systems Employee 
         Handbook. 

4.       DUTIES OF EMPLOYEE:  EMPLOYEE shall have the duties and authority as 
         set forth in the job description.

5.       ROLLING SIX (6) MONTH CONTRACT: This contract is a continuous, rolling 
         six (6) month agreement entitling employee to six (6) months 
         termination pay, at employees current salary, if terminated without 
         cause or without six (6) months written notice.

6.       VACATION:  EMPLOYEE shall accumulate paid vacation as set forth in 
         Extended Systems Time-Off Policy.

7.       TRAVEL EXPENSES:  EMPLOYEE shall be reimbursed for all authorized 
         travel and lodging expenses.

8.       FRINGE BENEFITS:  Fringe benefits shall be provided by ESI as set 
         forth in the Extended Systems Employee Handbook. I hereby acknowledge 
         receiving a copy of the Employee Handbook. I understand that I am 
         responsible for familiarizing myself with the contents of the 
         handbook. I understand that the contents in the Employee Handbook 
         are subject o change at Extended Systems' discretion and do not 
         create any contractual commitments by the Company.  /s/ SR 
         (Employee Initials) 

9.       DRUG AND ALCOHOL POLICY:  EMPLOYEE agrees to abide by the terms of the
         Extended Systems Drug and Alcohol Policy. Receipt of Drug and Alcohol 
         Policy is hereby acknowledged.  /s/ SR  (Employee Initials).

10.      NON-DISCLOSURE AGREEMENT:  EMPLOYEE agrees to abide by the terms of 
         the Extended Systems Non-Disclosure Agreement.



DATED this 25th day of November, 1998.



 /s/ Steven D. Simpson                        /s/ Scott Ritchie
--------------------------------------        -------------------------
                      Extended Systems                         Employee

                                      22
Process Diagram: Alcohols, C12-22, distn. Residues 

Fatty Acids

C12 fatty acid, 143-07-7 dodecanoic acid

C14 fatty acid, 544-63-8 tetradecanoic acid

C16 fatty acid, 57-10-3 hexadecanoic acid

C18 fatty acid, 57-11-4 octadecanoic acid

C20 fatty acid, 506-30-9 eicosanoic acid

C22 fatty acid, 112-85-6 docosanoic acid

C1214 fatty acid, 90990-10-6 Fatty acids, C12-14

C1216 fatty acid, 97404-27-8 Fatty acids, C12-16

C1218 fatty acid, 67701-01-3 Fatty acids, C12-18

C1618 fatty acid, 67701-03-5 Fatty acids, C16-18

C1822 fatty acid, 90990-11-7 Fatty acids, C18-22

C12-22 Raw Alcohol or Alcohol Mixture 

C12 alcohol, 112-53-8 1-dodecanol

C14 alcohol, 112-72-1 1-tetradecanol

C16 alcohol, 36653-82-4 1-hexadecanol

C18 alcohol, 112-92-5 1-octadecanol

C20 alcohol, 629-96-9 1-eicosanol

C22 alcohol, 661-19-8 1-docosanol

C1214 alcohol, 80206-82-2 Alcohols, C12-14

C1216 alcohol, 68855-56-1 Alcohols, C12-16

C1218 alcohol, 67762-25-8 Alcohols, C12-18

C1618 alcohol, 67762-27-0 Alcohols, C16-18

C1822 alcohol, 97552-91-5 Alcohols, C18-22

(C18-22 Alcohol + Alcohols, C18-22, distn. Residues)

0 – 15% 

Hydrogenation

Hydrogenation

Alcohols, C18-

22, distn. 

Residues 

1160164-88-4

Alcohols, C12-

22, distn. 

Residues

Re-processed 

Alcohols, C18-

22, distn. 

Residues

Distillation of 

Alcohols

Alcohols

Alcohols, C18-

22, distn. 

Residues 

1160164-88-4 

Alcohols, C18-

22, distn. 

Residues 

1160164-88-4

Alcohols, C12-

22, distn. 

Residues
C12-22 fatty linear alcohols are obtained by catalytic hydrogenation of fatty acid. This stream can 

consist of the individual C12-22 alcohols or of alcohol ranges that are based on the fatty acid precursor 

(see diagram above). The exact fatty acid being fed into the process is constantly changing between 

those listed above. The raw alcohol is then distilled to obtain the exact alcohol desired. The bottoms 

from the alcohol distillations are then combined in a tank. The composition of this “Alcohols, C12-22, 

distn. Residues” product varies highly depending on the current acid feedstock and how long that 

feedstock has been run.

The only variation from this mode is in the event that C18-22 alcohol is desired for an extended period 

of time. When this happens, the bottoms from the alcohol distillation are separated out as “1160164-

88-4; Alcohols, C18-22 distn. Residues.” This product can then be hydrogenated into alcohol, and 

redistilled to form a “Re-processed Alcohols, C18-22, distn. Residues.” This product may then be 

combined with the “Alcohols, C12-22 distn. Residues” product at up to 15%. The CAS name/number is 

being requested for the final product “Alcohols, C12-22, distn. Residues.”
# C_2017053EN.01002101.xml

| 20.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 53/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 53/21

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesarbeitsgericht (Germany) lodged on 10 November 2016 — Stadt Wuppertal v Maria Elisabeth Bauer

(Case C-569/16)

(2017/C 053/27)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundesarbeitsgericht

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Stadt Wuppertal

Applicant:

Defendant: Maria Elisabeth Bauer

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Do Article 7 of Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time (1) or Article 31(2) of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union allow the heir of a worker who died while in an employment relationship to be entitled to financial compensation in respect of the worker’s entitlement to minimum annual leave prior to his death, which is precluded by Paragraph 7(4) of the Bundesurlaubsgesetz (Federal Law on Paid Leave), read in conjunction with Paragraph 1922(1) of the Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch (the Civil Code)?

1

---

(1)  OJ 2003 L 299, p. 9.

1

---
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 116 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                 S. 116

 To amend title 10, United States Code, to permit veterans who have a 
  service-connected, permanent disability rated as total to travel on 
military aircraft in the same manner and to the same extent as retired 
          members of the Armed Forces entitled to such travel.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                            January 12, 2017

Mr. Heller (for himself and Mr. Tester) introduced the following bill; 
  which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Armed Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
 To amend title 10, United States Code, to permit veterans who have a 
  service-connected, permanent disability rated as total to travel on 
military aircraft in the same manner and to the same extent as retired 
          members of the Armed Forces entitled to such travel.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. TRANSPORTATION ON MILITARY AIRCRAFT ON A SPACE-AVAILABLE 
              BASIS FOR DISABLED VETERANS WITH A SERVICE-CONNECTED, 
              PERMANENT DISABILITY RATED AS TOTAL.

    (a) Availability of Transportation.--Section 2641b of title 10, 
United States Code, is amended--
            (1) by redesignating subsection (f) as subsection (g); and
            (2) by inserting after subsection (e) the following:
    ``(f) Special Priority for Certain Disabled Veterans.--(1) The 
Secretary of Defense shall provide transportation on scheduled and 
unscheduled military flights within the continental United States and 
on scheduled overseas flights operated by the Air Mobility Command on a 
space-available basis for any veteran with a service-connected, 
permanent disability rated as total.
    ``(2) Notwithstanding subsection (d)(1), in establishing space-
available transportation priorities under the travel program, the 
Secretary shall provide transportation under paragraph (1) on the same 
basis as such transportation is provided to members of the armed forces 
entitled to retired or retainer pay.
    ``(3) The requirement to provide transportation on Department of 
Defense aircraft on a space-available basis on the priority basis 
described in paragraph (2) to veterans covered by this subsection 
applies whether or not the travel program is established under this 
section.
    ``(4) In this subsection, the terms `veteran' and `service-
connected' have the meanings given those terms in section 101 of title 
38.''.
    (b) Effective Date.--Subsection (f) of section 2641b of title 10, 
United States Code, as added by subsection (a)(2) of this section, 
shall take effect at the end of the 90-day period beginning on the date 
of the enactment of this Act.
                                 <all>
```
# 2015_06 Pivot Table 5B

# Table 5

&F	

&P/&N
October 16, 2015

Mr. Belanger

Dronographs

19 Montgomery Avenue

Caribou, ME 04736

Dear Mr. Belanger:

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from 

§§ 61.113(a) and (b), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151, 91.405(a), 91.407(a), 91.409(a), 91.417(a) 

and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we cannot

process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Cannot Process Your Request

We received your July 23, 2015 exemption request on behalf of Dronographs filed in Docket 

No. FAA−2015−3114, but we are unable to process your request any further. Your petition 

does not comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the 

request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would 

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit 

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html. This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal 

Aviation Administration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any 

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information 

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption 

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption. 
2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further. 

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

 Airspace Rules Division

Enclosures
3
4
404782_1

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR

THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

 

:

:

MARA FLAMM, : CIVIL ACTION

:

Plaintiff, :

: NO. 02-4302

v. :

:

SARNER & ASSOCIATES, P.C. and :

JOSHUA SARNER, ESQUIRE and :

LEONARD SARNER, ESQUIRE and :

JODI H. BROWN, M.D. and JOHN :

MATUSAVAGE, :

:

Defendants. :

 :

ATTORNEY DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SUR-REPLY IN

SUPPORT OF ATTORNEY DEFENDANTS’ OPPOSITION TO

PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT

AND ATTORNEY DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS COUNT III OF

PLAINTIFFS’ PROPOSED AMENDED COMPLAINT

Defendants Sarner & Associates, P.C., Leonard Sarner, Esquire, and Joshua Sarner,

Esquire (collectively "attorney defendants"), hereby respectfully requests leave to file a SurReply Memorandum in support of both their Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to

Amend her Complaint and attorney defendants' alternatively pled Motion To Dismiss Count III

of the plaintiff's proposed Amended Complaint (a true and correct copy of which is attached

hereto as Exhibit “A”) in order to rebut certain legal arguments raised in plaintiff's Reply Brief in

Support of Motion to Amend Complaint and in Opposition to the Motion to Dismiss of the

Sarner Defendants.

By way of summary, the plaintiff has filed a Motion to Amend her Complaint on January

2, 2003. Attorney Defendants filed an Attorney defendants filed their Opposition to plaintiff's

Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 42 Filed 02/19/2003 Page 1 of 2
324854-1

2

Motion to Amend or, in the alternative, Motion to Dismiss Count III of the proposed Amended

Complaint on January 16, 2003. By stipulation of the parties, on February 12, 2003, plaintiff

filed a Reply in Support of her Motion to Amended the Complaint, which also served as her

Response to attorney defendants' Motion to Dismiss Count III of the proposed Amended

Complaint. The proposed Sur-Reply attached hereto is a response to plaintiff's filing of February

12, 2003 and is both a Sur-Reply in Opposition to plaintiff's Motion to Amend and a Response in

Support of attorney defendants' Motion to Dismiss Count III of the proposed Amended

Complaint.

WHEREFORE, the attorney defendants respectfully request that this Court permit them

to file the attached Sur-Reply Memorandum in further support of both their Opposition to

plaintiff's Motion to Amend her Complaint and their Motion to Dismiss Count III of plaintiff's

Proposed Amended Complaint.

A proposed form of Order is submitted herewith for the Court’s convenience.

Respectfully submitted,

CHRISTIE, PABARUE, MORTENSEN and YOUNG

A Professional Corporation

By: 

JAMES W. CHRISTIE (I.D. No. 12068)

WILLIAM F. MCDEVITT (I.D. No.: 80206)

Dated: Attorneys for Defendants Sarner & Associates, P.C.;

Joshua Sarner, Esquire and Leonard Sarner, Esquire

 (“Attorney Defendants”)

Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 42 Filed 02/19/2003 Page 2 of 2
# C_2015337EN.01003602.xml

| 12.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 337/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 337/36

---

Action brought on 11 August 2015 — Cham v Council

(Case T-470/15)

(2015/C 337/40)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Cham Holding (Damascus, Syria) (represented by: E. Ruchat, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Declare the applicant’s action admissible and well founded; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare the applicant’s action admissible and well founded;

| — | Consequently, annul Decision (CFSP) 2015/837 of 28 May 2015 and the subsequent measures implementing it, in so far as they relate to the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

Consequently, annul Decision (CFSP) 2015/837 of 28 May 2015 and the subsequent measures implementing it, in so far as they relate to the applicant;

| — | Order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant raises three pleas in law which are, in essence, identical or similar to those raised in Case T-432/11 in Makhlouf v Council
   (1).

Makhlouf

Council

1

---

(1)  OJ C 290, p. 13.

1

---
No. 59980.

#### G. B. Barham Co. and Frank P. Dow Company, Incorporated *v.*United States,

protests 171422-K and 171413-K (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of beef similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Swift & Company et al.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 212, C. D. 1655), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 16, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 9, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 104 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-50, CP2024-50.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-25262 Filed 11-15-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

PREMIUM PAYMENT PLAN,

Plaintiff,

v.

SHANNON CAB CO. T/A GOLDEN

LIMO SERVICES A/T/A LUXURY

LIMO,

Defendants.

Civil Action No. 04-4669

ORDER

June 14, 2010 Pollak, J.

AND NOW, this 14th day of June, 2010, for reasons stated in the accompanying

memorandum, Judge Angell’s order (docket no. 63) that defense counsel, Willan

Franklyn Joseph, may be deposed and must withdraw, reviewed on defendant’s appeal

(docket no. 64) is AFFIRMED IN PART. It is hereby ORDERED that (1) plaintiff can

depose Willan Franklyn Joseph and (2) that Joseph need not withdraw at this time.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Louis H. Pollak

Pollak, J.

1