alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


        <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                              JAN-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                            3719
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    38555
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (9517)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 43630
<PP&E>                                            8455
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (5602)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  125726
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          (37649)
<BONDS>                                       (206977)
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      187901
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  (125726)
<SALES>                                          34136
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 34136
<CGS>                                             5975
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    27902
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (98)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  2857
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                7076
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  (744)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         7
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (752)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (752)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
(V. D. 25)

Entry No. 766394.

#### Mark Cross Co. *v.*United States

(Decided September 14, 1956)

*Jordan & Klingaman (Jacob L. Klingaman*of counsel) for the plaintiff.

*George Cochran Doub,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This matter is presently before me on a remand from a classification proceeding decided by the first division of this court in *Mark Cross Co.*v. *United States,*34 Cust. Ct. 320, Abstract 58884. The judgment entered therein'stated: *“*** * that the matter be remanded to a single judge in reappraisement pursuant to the provisions of Title 28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d).”

The matter has been submitted for decision upon an agreed statement of facts entered into by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto.

Upon the agreed facts, I find the foreign value, as that value is defined in section 402 (c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1402 (c)), to be the proper basis for determining the values of the involved merchandise and that such values are 11 shillings, 7 pence, each, plus 15 per centum, for the leather cases, and 7 shillings per pair, plus 15 per centum, for the cuff links.

I further find such values to be the dutiable values of said merchandise.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
# C_2017277EN.01001501.xml

| 21.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 277/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 277/15

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 14 June 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Ordinario di Verona — Italy) — Livio Menini, Maria Antonia Rampanelli v Banco Popolare — Società Cooperativa

(Case C-75/16) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Consumer protection - Alternative dispute resolution (ADR) procedures - Directive 2008/52/EC - Directive 2013/11/EU - Article 3(2) - Applications by consumers to set an order aside in the context of payment order proceedings instituted by a credit institution - Right of access to the judicial system - National legislation providing for mandatory recourse to a mediation procedure - Obligation to be assisted by a lawyer - Condition for the admissibility of proceedings before the courts))

(2017/C 277/19)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunale Ordinario di Verona

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Livio Menini, Maria Antonia Rampanelli

Applicants:

Defendant: Banco Popolare — Società Cooperativa

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Directive 2013/11/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2013 on alternative dispute resolution for consumer disputes and amending Regulation (EC) No 2006/2004 and Directive 2009/22/EC (Directive on consumer ADR) must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which prescribes recourse to a mediation procedure, in disputes referred to in Article 2(1) of that directive, as a condition for the admissibility of legal proceedings relating to those disputes, to the extent that such a requirement does not prevent the parties from exercising their right of access to the judicial system.

On the other hand, that directive must be interpreted as precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which provides that, in the context of such mediation, consumers must be assisted by a lawyer and that they may withdraw from a mediation procedure only if they demonstrate the existence of a valid reason in support of that decision.

---

(1)  OJ C 156, 2.5.2016.

1

---
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 217 (Monday, November 13, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 77595-77596]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-24965]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIAID Investigator Initiated 
Program Project Applications (P01 Clinical Trial Not Allowed).

[[Page 77596]]

    Date: December 15, 2023.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G42B, 
Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Louis A. Rosenthal, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G42B, 
Rockville, MD 20852, (240) 669-5070, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#dba9b4a8beb5afb3bab7b7ba9bb5b2bab2bff5b5b2b3f5bcb4ad"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="d4a6bba7b1baa0bcb5b8b8b594babdb5bdb0fababdbcfab3bba2">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: November 7, 2023.
David W. Freeman,
Supervisory Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee 
Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-24965 Filed 11-9-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Case 2:04-cv-03641-AB Document 140 Filed 01/31/07 Page 1 of 16
Case 2:04-cv-03641-AB Document 140 Filed 01/31/07 Page 2 of 16
Case 2:04-cv-03641-AB Document 140 Filed 01/31/07 Page 3 of 16
Case 2:04-cv-03641-AB Document 140 Filed 01/31/07 Page 4 of 16
Case 2:04-cv-03641-AB Document 140 Filed 01/31/07 Page 5 of 16
Case 2:04-cv-03641-AB Document 140 Filed 01/31/07 Page 6 of 16
Case 2:04-cv-03641-AB Document 140 Filed 01/31/07 Page 7 of 16
Case 2:04-cv-03641-AB Document 140 Filed 01/31/07 Page 8 of 16
Case 2:04-cv-03641-AB Document 140 Filed 01/31/07 Page 9 of 16
Case 2:04-cv-03641-AB Document 140 Filed 01/31/07 Page 10 of 16
Case 2:04-cv-03641-AB Document 140 Filed 01/31/07 Page 11 of 16
Case 2:04-cv-03641-AB Document 140 Filed 01/31/07 Page 12 of 16
Case 2:04-cv-03641-AB Document 140 Filed 01/31/07 Page 13 of 16
Case 2:04-cv-03641-AB Document 140 Filed 01/31/07 Page 14 of 16
Case 2:04-cv-03641-AB Document 140 Filed 01/31/07 Page 15 of 16
Case 2:04-cv-03641-AB Document 140 Filed 01/31/07 Page 16 of 16
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 9, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 3, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 94 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-38, CP2024-38.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-24729 Filed 11-8-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
Exhibit 4.6


 


SECOND AMENDMENT TO


ENVIVA PARTNERS, LP


LONG-TERM INCENTIVE PLAN


 


WHEREAS, Enviva
Partners GP, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “General Partner”), the general partner of
Enviva Partners, LP, a Delaware limited partnership (the “Partnership”) has previously adopted the Enviva
Partners, LP Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”); and


 


WHEREAS, the
General Partner desires to amend the Plan in certain respects;


 


NOW, THEREFORE,
the Plan shall be amended as follows, effective as of January 27, 2021 (the “Second Amendment Effective Date”):


 


1.                 The
first sentence of Section 4(a) of the Plan shall be deleted and the following shall be substituted therefor:


 


    “Subject
to adjustment as provided in Section 4(c) and Section 7, the number of Units that may be delivered on and after January 27, 2021,
with respect to Awards under the Plan is 3,450,000 (which number is inclusive of the Units underlying Awards outstanding under
the Plan immediately prior to January 27, 2021).”


 


2.                 Section 9 of the Plan shall be deleted and the following shall be substituted therefor:


 


    “Section
9.     Term of the Plan.     The Plan, as amended, shall be effective on January 27, 2021 and shall continue until
the earliest of (i) the date terminated by the Board or the Committee, (ii) the date that all Units available under the Plan have
been delivered to Participants, or (iii) January 27, 2031. However, unless otherwise expressly provided in the Plan or in an applicable
Award Agreement, any Award granted prior to such termination, and the authority of the Board or the Committee under the Plan or
an Award Agreement to amend, alter, adjust, suspend, discontinue, or terminate any such Award or to waive any conditions or rights
under such Award, shall extend beyond such termination date.”


 


3.                 As
amended hereby, the Plan is specifically ratified and reaffirmed.


 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
the undersigned has caused this Second Amendment to be executed on the Second Amendment Effective Date, effective for all purposes
as provided above.


 


	 	ENVIVA
    PARTNERS GP, LLC
	 	 
	 	By:	/s/
    Joseph N. Lane
	 	Name:	Joseph
    N. Lane
	 	Title:	Executive
    Vice President, Human Capital
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 939 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 939

             Providing for the consideration of H.R. 4796.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 13, 2018

Mr. Hurd submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                           Committee on Rules

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
             Providing for the consideration of H.R. 4796.

    Resolved, That immediately upon adoption of this resolution, the 
House shall proceed to the consideration in the House of the bill (H.R. 
4796) to provide relief from removal and adjustment of status of 
certain individuals who are long-term United States residents and who 
entered the United States before reaching the age of 18, improve border 
security, foster United States engagement in Central America, and for 
other purposes. All points of order against consideration of the bill 
are waived. The bill shall be considered as read. All points of order 
against provisions in the bill are waived. The previous question shall 
be considered as ordered on the bill and on any amendment thereto to 
final passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate 
equally divided and controlled by the Majority Leader and the Minority 
Leader or their respective designees; (2) an amendment, if offered by 
Representative Hurd of Texas or his designee, which shall be in order 
without intervention of any point of order (except those arising under 
clause 7 of rule XVI), shall be considered as read, shall be separately 
debatable for 10 minutes equally divided and controlled by the 
proponent and an opponent, and shall not be subject to a demand for 
division of the question; and (3) one motion to recommit with or 
without instructions.
    Sec. 2.  Clause 1(c) of rule XIX shall not apply to the 
consideration of H.R. 4796.
                                 <all>
```
No. 52204.

protests 98219-K, etc. (New York).

#### Albarosa Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise consist of cheese similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Scaramelli*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706), Abstract 42146, and Abstract 48269. In accordance therewith it was held that an allowance of 2}4 percent should have been made in the weight of the cheese by the collector in computing the duty thereon to compensate for the weight of the inedible coverings on the outside of the cheese. The protests were sustained to this extent.
Exhibit 10.5
Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation Policy
 
Under the Company’s non-employee director compensation policy, all non-employee directors will be paid an annual retainer fee of $45,000 and such additional fees as are set forth in the following table. All payments will be made quarterly in arrears.
 
	Non-Employee Director
	 
	Annual Fee
	 

	Lead Director
	 
	$
	25,000
	 

	Non-Executive Chair
	 
	$
	30,000
	 

	Chairman of the audit committee
	 
	$
	20,000
	 

	Member of the audit committee (other than chairman)
	 
	$
	10,000
	 

	Chairman of the compensation committee
	 
	$
	15,000
	 

	Member of the compensation committee (other than chairman)
	 
	$
	7,500
	 

	Chairman of the governance and nominating committee
	 
	$
	10,000
	 

	Member of the governance and nominating committee (other than chairman)
	 
	$
	5,000
	 



 
Under the policy, each individual who is initially appointed or elected to the board of directors will be eligible to receive an option to purchase up to 30,000 shares of our common stock under the 2017 Equity Incentive Plan on the date he or she first becomes a non-employee director. These option grants will vest annually over a three-year period from the date of grant, subject to continued service as a non-employee director through that vesting date. In addition, on the date of the annual meeting of stockholders, each continuing non-employee director who has served on the board of directors for a minimum of six months will be eligible to receive an option grant to purchase up to 15,000 shares of our common stock, which will vest in full upon the earlier of the first anniversary of the date of grant or the date of the next annual meeting of stockholders. The exercise price for each of these option grants will be equal to the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant. These new director grants and annual grants will be subject to approval by our board of directors at the time of grant. The share numbers set forth herein will be appropriately adjusted for any split or recapitalization of the Company’s securities.
II 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION S. 1142 

To extend the deadline for commencement of construction of certain 

hydroelectric projects. 

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES 

MAY 16, 2017 

Mr. CASSIDY introduced the following bill; which was read twice and referred 

to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources 

A BILL 

To extend the deadline for commencement of construction 

of certain hydroelectric projects. 

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, 

3 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE. 

4 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘J. Bennett Johnston 

5 Waterway Hydropower Extension Act of 2017’’. 

6 SEC. 2. EXTENSION. 

7 (a) IN GENERAL.—Notwithstanding the time period 

8 specified in section 13 of the Federal Power Act (16 

9 U.S.C. 806) that would otherwise apply to Federal Energy 

10 Regulatory Commission project numbers 12756, 12757, 


rfrederick on DSK30NT082PROD with BILLS
2 

•S 1142 IS

1 and 12758, the Commission may, at the request of the 

2 licensee for the applicable project, and after reasonable no3 tice, in accordance with the good faith, due diligence, and 

4 public interest requirements of that section and the Com5 mission’s procedures under that section, extend the time 

6 period during which such licensee is required to commence 

7 the construction of its applicable project for up to 3 con8 secutive 2-year periods from the date of the expiration of 

9 the extension originally issued by the Commission under 

10 that section for such project. 

11 (b) OBLIGATION FOR PAYMENT OF ANNUAL

12 CHARGES.—Any obligation of a licensee for a project de13 scribed in subsection (a) for the payment of annual 

14 charges under section 10(e) of the Federal Power Act (16 

15 U.S.C. 803(e)) shall commence when the construction of 

16 the project commences. 

17 (c) REINSTATEMENT OF LICENSE; EFFECTIVE DATE

18 FOR EXTENSION.— 

19 (1) REINSTATEMENT.—If the time period re20 quired for commencement of construction of a 

21 project described in subsection (a) has expired prior 

22 to the date of the enactment of this Act, the Com23 mission may reinstate the license for such project, 

24 effective as of the date of the expiration of the li25 cense. 


rfrederick on DSK30NT082PROD with BILLS
3 

•S 1142 IS

1 (2) EFFECTIVE DATE FOR EXTENSION.—If the 

2 Commission reinstates a license under paragraph (1) 

3 for a project, the first extension authorized under 

4 subsection (a) with respect to such project shall take 

5 effect on the effective date of such reinstatement 

6 under paragraph (1). 

Æ 


rfrederick on DSK30NT082PROD with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 20-40244

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff−Appellee,

versus

BRUCE ALLEN RUTHERFORD, also known as Allen Bruce Rutherford,

Defendant−Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

No. 4:19-CV-348

 No. 4:17-CR-41-1

Before SMITH, COSTA, and HO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Bruce Rutherford, federal prisoner #27006-078, appeals the denial of 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIRCUIT RULE 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion 

should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth 

in 5TH CIRCUIT RULE 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

June 26, 2020

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 Case: 20-40244 Document: 00515468029 Page: 1 Date Filed: 06/26/2020
No. 20-40244

2

summary judgment and the denial of release on bail in a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 proceeding challenging his conviction and sentence for possession of child pornography. He asserts several claims of ineffective counsel. He also moves for bail 

pending appeal and for leave to appeal in forma pauperis (“IFP”). Rutherford’s 

motion to appeal IFP is granted, but we dispose of the appeal without further 

briefing.

The denial of the motion for summary judgment is not a final appealable 

judgment under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. See Skelton v. Camp, 234 F.3d 292, 295 (5th 

Cir. 2000). No recognized exception to the final judgment rule applies here. 

Accordingly, the appeal is DISMISSED in part for want of jurisdiction with

regard to the denial of summary judgment.

Rutherford’s motion for release on bail pending appeal is DENIED

because he fails to “raise[ ] substantial constitutional claims upon which he 

has a high probability of success” and because he fails to allege or show that 

“extraordinary or exceptional circumstances exist which make the grant of bail 

necessary to make the habeas remedy effective.” Calley v. Callaway, 496 F.2d 

701, 702 (5th Cir. 1974). For the same reasons, the denial of release on bail 

pending the disposition of the § 2255 motion is AFFIRMED. See id.

 Case: 20-40244 Document: 00515468029 Page: 2 Date Filed: 06/26/2020