alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary  information  extracted from the Balance Sheet at
September  30, 1999 and  Statement of  Operations  for the three and nine months
ended  September 30, 1999, and is qualified  inits entirety by reference to such
financial statements.

</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1000

<S>                                      <C>              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                 3-MOS            9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999      DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999      JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999      SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                              1,975           1,975
<SECURITIES>                                            0               0
<RECEIVABLES>                                           0               0
<ALLOWANCES>                                            0               0
<INVENTORY>                                             0               0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                        0               0
<PP&E>                                            237,160         237,160
<DEPRECIATION>                                    (28,918)        (28,918)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    229,785         229,785
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                   0               0
<BONDS>                                           142,000         142,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                   0               0
<PREFERRED>                                             0               0
<COMMON>                                                0               0
<OTHER-SE>                                         81,623          81,623
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      229,785         229,785
<SALES>                                             9,969          29,306
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   10,063          29,592
<CGS>                                               3,794          10,825
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       3,794          10,825
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    2,887           8,540
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                        0               0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                  2,278           6,815
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     1,104           3,412
<INCOME-TAX>                                            0               0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                 1,104           3,412
<DISCONTINUED>                                          0               0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                         0               0
<CHANGES>                                               0               0
<NET-INCOME>                                        1,104           3,412
<EPS-BASIC>                                           0               0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                           0               0



</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

: CIVIL ACTION NOS.

:

WALKER : 02-3868

SIMON : 02-3887

GOTO : 02-3922

JOHNSON, et al. : 02-3932

HOSOKAWA : 02-3959

KILCY : 02-3964

BYRON : 02-4108

ROCHA, et al. : 02-4121

CAVITT : 02-4139

HIBMA-CANARIO, et al. : 02-4152

BAILEY, et al. : 02-4188

BOSSI, et al. : 02-4234

STEINHAUER, et al. : 02-4257

SKEELS, et al. : 02-4274

WALKER, et al. : 02-4279

FRIEDEN, et al. : 02-4310

DIMANLANTA : 02-4313

:

:

VS. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION, et al. :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of July, 2002, the Court having been previously

advised that the above action cannot proceed to trial and disposition because of the following

reason:

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending disposition of a related

action.

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending determination of

arbitration proceedings.

[ ] - Interlocutory appeal filed.

Case 2:02-cv-04188-RBS Document 2 Filed 07/11/2002 Page 1 of 2
[ X ] - Other: Case is placed into suspense pending receipt of the Case

Transfer Order from the Judicial Panel on Multi District Litigation

transferring case to District of Minnesota..

It is

ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this action closed for statistical purposes and

place the matter in the Civil Suspense File, and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction; and that the case be

restored to the trial docket when the action is in a status so that it may proceed to final

disposition; this order shall not prejudice the rights of the parties to this litigation.

BY THE COURT:

________________________________________

R. Barclay Surrick

Case 2:02-cv-04188-RBS Document 2 Filed 07/11/2002 Page 2 of 2
No. 52895.

#### J. Ebrahimoff *v.*United States,

protest 121776-K (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of platinum fox fur skins, undressed, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. O. *Brager-Larsen*(36 C. C. P. A. 1, C. A. D. 388). The claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was therefore sustained.
# C_2016392EN.01000601.xml

| 24.10.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 392/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.10.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 392/6

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesfinanzhof (Germany) lodged on 7 July 2016 — Finanzamt Bergisch Gladbach v Igor Butin

(Case C-375/16)

(2016/C 392/07)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Bundesfinanzhof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Finanzamt Bergisch Gladbach

Applicant:

Defendant: Igor Butin

Defendant:

Questions referred

Questions referred

| 1. | Does Article 226(5) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax of 28 November 2006 (‘the VAT Directive’) (1) require the taxable person to indicate an address at which he carries on his economic activities? |
| --- | --- |

1.

Does Article 226(5) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax of 28 November 2006 (‘the VAT Directive’) (1) require the taxable person to indicate an address at which he carries on his economic activities?

1

| 2. | If the answer to Question 1 is in the negative:






  a) | Is a letterbox address sufficient as an indication of address pursuant to Article 226(5) of the VAT Directive? |
| --- | --- | --- |

2.

If the answer to Question 1 is in the negative:

a)

Is a letterbox address sufficient as an indication of address pursuant to Article 226(5) of the VAT Directive?

| b) | Which address must a taxable person who operates an undertaking (in the Internet trade, for example) with no business premises indicate on an invoice? |
| --- | --- |

b)

Which address must a taxable person who operates an undertaking (in the Internet trade, for example) with no business premises indicate on an invoice?

| 3. | In the event that the formal invoicing requirements laid down in Article 226 of the VAT Directive are not met, must the taxable person automatically be allowed to deduct input tax where no tax evasion has been committed or the taxable person did not know, and could not have known, of the connection with fraud or, in that event, does the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations presuppose that the taxable person has done everything that could reasonably be required of him in order to verify the accuracy of the content of the invoice? |
| --- | --- |

3.

In the event that the formal invoicing requirements laid down in Article 226 of the VAT Directive are not met, must the taxable person automatically be allowed to deduct input tax where no tax evasion has been committed or the taxable person did not know, and could not have known, of the connection with fraud or, in that event, does the principle of the protection of legitimate expectations presuppose that the taxable person has done everything that could reasonably be required of him in order to verify the accuracy of the content of the invoice?

---

(1)  OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1.

1

---
# WEST VIRGINIA

SECRETARY OF STATE

BETTY IREL A N D 

# A D M INISTRAT IVE LAW DIVI SI ON Form # 3 

# c. = ! 1 Do } ~~ t i Mar ; k 

### In This B ox I U I. _" L
_ . . L --"'"

___________________________ -- 1 ... __ 1 -- _



### NOT I CE OF AGENCY APPROVAL OF A PROPOSED ~ULE AND FIL I NG WITH THE LEGISLATIVE RULE-MAKING REVIEW COMMI T TEE AGENCY: __ WV_D_ e

__ p_art_m_ e n_t_of_E_n v_if_onm_e_nt_ al_Pf_ot_ e cti_on_, D_i _v i_ s i_on_o_f

A_i _f Q_u_al_ity _ - +TITLE NUMBER: __ 45_ YE S~ N O_ CITE AUT H O RlT Y : W_o V _ a_ o C_ _d e_ § _ 2 _ 2 - _ 5 -_4 

### + - _ A M EN D M E NT TO AN EXIST I NG RULE: I F YES , SERIES N U MBER O F RU LE BEING AMENDED: 14 __ T I T LE OF RU LE BEI N G AMEN D E D: P ermit s fO f C o n s truction

and MajO f Mo d i cati on ofMaio f S tatio n ary S ou rces of Air P ollutio n fo r the Prev e ntio n

of Significant

D eterioratio n IF N O , S ER IES NUM B E R O F RU LE BE IN G PROPOSED: _ T I TLE OF RULE BE I N G PR O P OSE D : 

### - + _ THE ABOVE PROPOSED LEG I SLAT I VE RU L E HAV I NG GONE T OAPUB L C H EARING O RA PUBLIC COMMEN T PE RI OD IS HE REBY APPROVE D B Y T H E PROMUL G AT I N G A ENCY FOR F I L I NG W I TH THE SECRETA R Y OF STATE AND THE LEGISLA TI V E RULE - MAKIN G V I EW COMM I TTEE FOR T H E IR REV I EWo 

## ~.UG 29



## Re\J\ew CQ{nmit te e
Document

Exhibit 10.13

AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
THIS AMENDMENT NO. 2 TO AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT, AS PREVIOUSLY AMENDED (this “Amendment No.2") is effective as of this 28th day of March, 2017 (the ''Effective Date"), between Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc., a Maryland Corporation ("SBG"), and Barry M. Faber ("Employee"),
RECITALS
A.    SBG and Employee are parties to that certain Amended and Restated Employment Agreement dated November 11, 2011 (the ''Original Agreement").
B.    SBG and Employee previously entered into an Amendment No, 1 to the Original Agreement, effective as of August 3.l, 2015 (the Original Agreement as so amended, the ''Agreement").
C.    The parties hereto desire to amend the Agreement pursuant to the terms and conditions of this Amendment No. 2. Capitalized terms used in this Amendment No. 2 but not otherwise defined shall have the meaning ascribed to such terms in the Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERATION OF the mutual covenants herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1.    The Agreement is hereby amended by deleting clause (1) of Section 4.2(e) in its entirety and inserting in lieu thereof the following:
1. within thirty (30) days after the Termination Date, the Base Salary with respect to the then current year that would have been payable to Employee under Section 3.1 of this Agreement had the Employment Term ended on the last day of the month in which the Termination Date occurs, plus twelve (12) additional months’ Base Salary, plus any unpaid bonus (other than a Discretionary Bonus or the Longevity Bonus) that Employee had the potential to earn with respect to such year;    
2.    Except as expressly modified by this Amendment No. 2, the Agreement continues in full force and effect as if set forth specifically herein.
3.    This Amendment No. 2 may be executed in any number of counterparts, all of which when taken together shall constitute one agreement.
[The signatures of the parties appear on the immediately following page]


 

















Exhibit 10.13

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement effective as
of the date first written above.


SINCLAIR BROADCAST GROUP, INC.
By:     /s/ Chris Ripley
Name:     Chris Ripley
Title:     CEO


EMPLOYEE:
/s/ Barry M. Faber
Barry M. Faber
# C_2015398EN.01006701.xml

| 30.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 398/67 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 398/67

---

Action brought on 28 September 2015 — Excalibur City v OHIM — Ferrero (MERLIN'S KINDERWELT)

(Case T-566/15)

(2015/C 398/81)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Excalibur City s.r.o. (Znojmo, Czech Republic) (represented by:E. EnginDeniz, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Ferrero SpA (Alba, Italy)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Applicant of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word elements ‘MERLIN’S KINDERWELT’– Application for registration No 1 1 2 02  066

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before OHIM

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 16 July 2015 in Case R 1617/2014-1

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | alter the contested decision so as to reject the opposition of the Opponent;

  in eventu |
| --- | --- |

—

alter the contested decision so as to reject the opposition of the Opponent;

in eventu

in eventu

| — | annul the contested decision as well as the decision of the Opposition Division of 26 May 2014, opposition No B 002152844; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision as well as the decision of the Opposition Division of 26 May 2014, opposition No B 002152844;

| — | order OHIM to pay the fees and costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the fees and costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In Re: FAO INC. Securities Litigation

STEPHEN HILL, et al.

 v.

JERRY R. WELCH, et al.

CIVIL ACTION

NO. 03-6596

ORDER

And NOW, this 23rd day of October 2015, for the reasons stated in the foregoing 

memorandum, upon consideration of Lead Plaintiff’s Motion for an Order Directing Cy Pres

Distribution of Residual Settlement Funds, it is hereby ORDERED that: 

1. Said Motion is GRANTED;

2. Plaintiff’s counsel shall distribute the remaining settlement funds in the amount of 

$2,305.45 to Community Legal Services of Philadelphia within thirty (30) days of the 

docketing of this Order.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Michael M. Baylson

_______________________________

MICHAEL M. BAYLSON, U.S.D.J.

O:\Steve.2015\03-cv-6596 Hill v. Welch (Cy Pres)\03cv6596.2015.10.23.order.doc

Case 2:03-cv-06596-MMB Document 32 Filed 10/23/15 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the annual report of BBCN Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) as amended by Form 10-K/A for the period ended December 31, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Report”), I, Douglas J. Goddard, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that:





(1)    the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for the periods presented therein.





This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission.





By:/s/ DOUGLAS J. GODDARDDouglas J. GoddardExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial OfficerDate:  May 1, 2015
Record of Discussion 

Docket No. FAA- Directorate Identifier: -AD 

With whom outside the FAA has this AD action been discussed (i.e., Design Approval Holder, 

manufacturer, ATA, NBAA, RAA, AOPA, ALPA, GAMA, etc)? 

ORGANIZATION PERSON CONTACTED DATE TOPICS DISCUSSED 

Boeing Barry Bannister 6116/2015 Announced actions to 

Boeing 

A4A Bob Ireland 6/ 15/2015 Announced actions to 

A4A 

Other/ Additional Information:
**

Newsletter for the USDA Plant Genome Research Program

- Volume 6, Final July 1996  Volume 5, No. 2  April - June 1995Volume 5, No. 1  February - March 1995
- Volume 4, No. 3/4  August 1994 - January 1995  Volume 4, No. 1/2  July 1993-July 1994Volume 3, No. 1/2  January-June 1993
- Volume 2, No. 3 Fall 1992  Volume 2, No. 2   Summer 1992Volume 2, No. 1   Spring 1992
- Volume 1, No. 3/4 Fall/Winter 1991  Volume 1, No. 1/2 Spring/Summer 1991**Return to Plant Genome Data and Information Center**

**
WAGE GARNISHMENT WORKSHEET (SF-329C)

Notice to Employers: The Employer may use a copy of this Worksheet each pay period to calculate the Wage

Garnishment Amount to be deducted from a debtor's disposable pay. Disposable pay includes, but is not limited

to, salary, overtime, bonuses, commissions, sick leave and vacation pay. If section 2(a) of the Wage

Garnishment Order specifies the dollar amount to be garnished, the employer does not need to complete

this Worksheet.

'HEWRU1DPH 6RFLDO6HFXULW\1XPEHU

Pay Period Frequency (Select One): . . . .. )

DISPOSABLE PAY COMPUTATION

1.

2.

3.

Gross Amount paid to Employee

Amounts Withheld:

a. Federal income tax

b. F.I.C.A. (social security)

c. Medicare

d. State tax (including income tax, unemployment, disability)

e. City/Local tax

f. Health insurance premiums

g. Involuntary retirement or pension plan payments

Total allowable deductions [Add lines a - g]

WAGE GARNISHMENT AMOUNT COMPUTATION

If the Employee's wages are not subject to any withholding orders with priority, skip to line 8.

25% of Disposable Pay [Multiply line 4 by .25]

Total Amounts Withheld Under Other Wage Withholding Orders with Priority.

See section 2(b) of the Order.

Subtract line 6 from line 5 [If line 6 is more than line 5, enter zero]

Multiply the percentage from section 2(b)(1) of the Order by line 4. (The percentage from section 2(b)(1) of

the Order may not exceed 15%). Example: If the percentage from section 2(b)(1) of the Order is 15%,

multiply .15 by line 4.

Amount equivalent to 30 times the Federal Minimum wage ($.5)

If the employee is paid Line 9 is If the employee is paid Line 9 is

Weekly or less.50 2x per month4.5

Every other week.00 Monthly9.50

Subtract line 9 from line 4 [if line 9 is more than line 4, enter zero]

WAGE GARNISHMENT AMOUNT

Line 7, 8, or 10, whichever amount is the smallest

STANDARD FORM 329C (11-98)

Prescribed by 31 CFR 285.11

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

Weekly or less Every other week Two times per month Monthly Other (Specify:

4. DISPOSABLE PAY [Subtract line 3 from line 1]

AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION