IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 970 

Insisting that the Department of Justice fully comply with the requests, 

including subpoenas, of the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence 

and the subpoena issued by the Committee on the Judiciary relating 

to potential violations of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act by 

personnel of the Department of Justice and related matters. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 27, 2018 

Mr. MEADOWS (for himself, Mr. JORDAN, Mr. BUCK, Mr. GAETZ, Mr. JOHNSON of Louisiana, Mr. DESANTIS, Mr. DESJARLAIS, Mr. ZELDIN, Mr. 

PERRY, Mr. GOSAR, Mr. BRAT, Mr. DUNCAN of South Carolina, Mr. 

HARRIS, Mr. DAVIDSON, Mr. BIGGS, Mr. SCALISE, Mr. JODY B. HICE

of Georgia, Mr. NORMAN, Mr. MOONEY of West Virginia, and Mr. GRIFFITH) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence (Permanent Select), for a period to be subsequently 

determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned 

RESOLUTION 

Insisting that the Department of Justice fully comply with 

the requests, including subpoenas, of the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and the subpoena issued 

by the Committee on the Judiciary relating to potential 

violations of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act 

by personnel of the Department of Justice and related 

matters. 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 970 IH 

Whereas ‘‘the power of the Congress to conduct investigations is inherent in the legislative process. That power is 

broad. It encompasses inquiries concerning the administration of existing laws as well as proposed or possibly 

needed statutes [and] comprehends probes into departments of the Federal Government to expose corruption, 

inefficiency or waste.’’ (Watkins v. United States (354 

U.S. 178, 187)); 

Whereas a necessary corollary of Congress’s oversight and investigative authority is the power to issue and enforce 

subpoenas. The ‘‘[I]ssuance of subpoenas . . . has long 

been held to be a legitimate use by Congress of its power 

to investigate.’’ (Eastland v. U.S. Serviceman’s Fund 

(421 U.S. 491, 504)); 

Whereas Chairman Devin Nunes of the Permanent Select 

Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives requested information on potential abuses of the 

Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act in a March 8, 2017, 

letter to the Department of Justice; 

Whereas the Committee reviewed responsive documents on 

March 17, 2017, but thereafter the Department of Justice refused to make the documents available; 

Whereas Chairman Nunes issued a subpoena on August 24, 

2017, to include the documents sought on March 8, 

2017; 

Whereas the Department of Justice came to substantially 

comply with the subpoena 10 months after the subpoena 

and more than one year from the original request; 

Whereas Chairman Nunes sought documents related to 9 current or former Department of Justice personnel in a 

March 23, 2018, letter; 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 970 IH 

Whereas the Department of Justice complied with the request 

relating to one individual on May 8, 2018, but has yet 

to fully comply with the other requests; 

Whereas Chairman Nunes sent a letter classified ‘‘SECRET’’ 

on April 24, 2018, followed by a subpoena on April 30, 

2018, which demanded the production of all documents 

related to the issue identified in the earlier letter; 

Whereas compliance with this letter and subpoena has to date 

been limited to briefings and access to supporting documents, which have not been provided to all of the Members and cleared staff of the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence; 

Whereas the exclusion of the Members and cleared staff from 

access to these briefings and supporting documents 

amounts to non-compliance with the April 30 subpoena; 

Whereas, on October 24, 2017, the Committees on the Judiciary and Oversight and Government Reform opened a 

joint investigation into the decisions made by the Department of Justice in 2016 and 2017 related to its handling 

of the investigation of the emails of former Secretary of 

State Hillary Clinton; 

Whereas, on November 3, 2017, Chairman Goodlatte, Chairman Gowdy, and four Members of Congress sent a letter 

to Attorney General Sessions and Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein requesting 5 specific categories of documents; 

Whereas, on December 12, 2017, Chairman Goodlatte, Chairman Gowdy, and other Members sent a letter emphasizing the expectation that the Department of Justice 

provide all requested documents as well as a privilege log; 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
4 

•HRES 970 IH 

Whereas, on February 1, 2018, Chairman Goodlatte sent a 

letter requesting documents related to potential Foreign 

Intelligence Surveillance Act abuses; 

Whereas the Department of Justice has missed document 

production deadlines, produced duplicative pages of information, and redacted pages to the point where they contain no probative information; 

Whereas the Committee on the Judiciary issued a subpoena 

to Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein on March 22, 

2018, which compelled him to produce, among other 

things— 

(1) all documents and communications referring or 

relating to internal Department of Justice or Federal Bureau of Investigation management requests to review, 

scrub, report on, or analyze any reporting of Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act collection involving, or coverage mentioning, the Trump campaign or the Trump 

administration; 

(2) all documents and communications referring or 

relating to defensive briefings provided by the Department of Justice or the Federal Bureau of Investigation 

to the 2016 presidential campaigns of Hillary Clinton or 

President Trump; and 

(3) all documents and communications referring or 

relating to proposed, recommended, or actual Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act coverage on the Clinton Foundation or persons associated or in communication with 

the Clinton Foundation; and 

Whereas the Department of Justice has failed to comply with 

the March 22 subpoena by failing to substantially comply 

with the demand for the production of all of these categories of documents: Now, therefore, be it 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
5 

•HRES 970 IH 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives insists 

2 that, by not later than July 6, 2018, the Department of 

3 Justice fully comply with the requests, including sub4 poenas, of the Permanent Select Committee on Intel5 ligence and the subpoena issued by the Committee on the 

6 Judiciary relating to potential violations of the Foreign 

7 Intelligence Surveillance Act by personnel of the Depart8 ment of Justice and related matters. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS