alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017424EN.01000501.xml

| 11.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 424/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 424/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 19 October 2017 — Agriconsulting Europe SA v European Commission

(Case C-198/16 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Non-contractual liability of the European Union - Public service contract - Operational technical assistance to set up and manage a network facility for the implementation of the European Innovation Partnership ‘Agricultural Productivity and Sustainability’ - Rejection of a tenderer’s bid - Abnormally low bid - Adversarial procedure))

(2017/C 424/06)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Agriconsulting Europe SA (represented by: R. Sciaudone, avvocato)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: L. Di Paolo and F. Moro, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Agriconsulting Europe SA to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Agriconsulting Europe SA to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 279, 1.8.2016.

1

---
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In
connection with the Amended Quarterly Report of National Equipment Services, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2002 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Michael Milligan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as
adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/MICHAEL MILLIGAN

Michael
Milligan
Chief Financial Officer
August 23, 2002

---

QuickLinks
<PAGE>


                                                                   EXHIBIT 99(a)

                         INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REPORT



The Board of Directors
American Honda Finance Corporation

Members of the Board:

We have examined management's assertion about American Honda Finance
Corporation's (the Company's) compliance with the minimum servicing standards
set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of America Uniform Single
Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers, as they relate to the servicing of
retail automobile loan contracts, as of and for the year ended March 31, 2003
included in the accompanying management's assertion. The minimum servicing
standards not considered by the Company to be applicable to the servicing of
retail automobile loans include procedures 2, 3 and 4 of section I - Custodial
Bank Accounts, procedures 1, 2, 3 and 4 of section III - Disbursements and
procedures 2, 3 and 4 of section V - Mortgage Loan Accounting. Management is
responsible for the Company's compliance with the applicable minimum servicing
standards. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on management's assertion
about the Company's compliance based on our examination.

Our examination was made in accordance with standards established by the
American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and, accordingly, including
examining, on a test basis, evidence about the Company's compliance with the
minimum servicing standards and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our examination
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a
legal determination on the Company's compliance with the minimum servicing
standards.

Our examination disclosed the following material noncompliance with insurance
requirements applicable to the Company as of and for the year ended March 31,
2003. The Company was not in compliance with minimum servicing standards for
maintaining an errors and omissions policy effective during the year ended March
31, 2003.

In our opinion, except for the material noncompliance described in the third
paragraph, American Honda Finance Corporation has complied, in all material
respects, with the aforementioned minimum servicing standards as of and for the
year ended March 31, 2003.


/s/ KPMG LLP


September 25, 2003
##### 



Exhibit 31.2
 WESTERN RESERVE BANCORP, INC.
FORM 10-QSB
Quarter ended September 30, 2005
 CERTIFICATIONS
  1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Western Reserve Bancorp, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented
in this report;4.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing
and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e) for the small business issuer and have:
 (a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
the period in which this report is being prepared;(b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and(c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuers internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuers most
recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth fiscal quarter in the case of
an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the small business issuers internal control over financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most
recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers
auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):
 (a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial information; and(b)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal control over
financial reporting.
 Date:  November 14, 2005
    /s/ Cynthia A. MahlCynthia A. Mahl, Senior Vice President and CFO
EX-10.23





 Exhibit 10.23 

Spousal Consent 
 The
undersigned, Ye YE, a People’s Republic of China (“China” or the “PRC”) citizen with PRC Identification Card No.: 330682198508197829, is the lawful spouse of Xueji WANG, a PRC citizen with PRC Identification Card No.:
330329198208082511. I hereby unconditionally and irrevocably agree to the execution of the following documents (hereinafter referred to as the “Transaction Documents”) by Xueji WANG on 23 August 2019, and the disposal of the equity
interests of Hangzhou Tuya Technology Co., Ltd. (“Hangzhou Tuya”) held by Xueji WANG and registered in his name according to the following documents: 
  

	 	(1)	 The Amended and Restated Equity Interest Pledge Agreement entered into with Hangzhou Tuya Infomration
Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “WFOE”) and Hangzhou Tuya; 


  

	 	(2)	 The Amended and Restated Exclusive Option Agreement entered into with the WFOE and Hangzhou Tuya; and



  

	 	(3)	 The Power of Attorney executed by Xueji WANG. 



I hereby undertake not to make any assertions in connection with the equity interests of Hangzhou Tuya which are held by Xueji WANG. I hereby
further confirm that Xueji WANG can perform the Transaction Documents and further amend or terminate the Transaction Documents without the authorization or consent from me. 

I hereby undertake to execute all necessary documents and take all necessary actions to ensure appropriate performance of the Transaction
Documents (as may be amended from time to time). 












 I hereby agree and undertake that if I obtain any equity interests of Hangzhou Tuya which
are held by Xueji WANG for any reasons, I shall be bound by the Transaction Documents and the Exclusive Business Cooperation Agreement entered into between the WFOE and Hangzhou Tuya as of December 23, 2014 (the “Exclusive Business
Cooperation Agreement”) (as may be amended from time to time) and comply with the obligations thereunder as a shareholder of Hangzhou Tuya. For this purpose, upon the WFOE’s request, I shall sign a series of written documents in
substantially the same format and content as the Transaction Documents and the Exclusive Business Cooperation Agreement (as may be amended from time to time). 












 Hereby Confirm. 

 

			
	/s/ Ye YE
	Name:	 	Ye YE
	Date:	 	August 23, 2019
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MICHELE RICCI : CIVIL ACTION

v. :

:

AETNA, INC. d/b/a AETNA U.S. HEALTHCARE : NO. 02-4330

AND AETNA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 19th day of December, 2002, after conducting a telephone status conference

with counsel, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Discovery is extended forty-five (45) days, or until March 3, 2003; 

2. A Telephone Status Conference will take place on March 4, 2003, at 10:00 a.m. to

determine whether discovery has been completed, to set a time frame for expert discovery and/or

dispositive motions, as well as explore the possibility of a resolution of the matter. Plaintiff’s

counsel shall initiate this conference call to (215) 507-6079.

3. The Telephone Status Conference previously scheduled for January 22, 2003, is cancelled.

BY THE COURT:

 

M. FAITH ANGELL

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:02-cv-04330-TJS Document 19 Filed 12/20/2002 Page 1 of 1
November 23, 2015

Dear Mr. Odom:

This letter is to inform you th at the following information is missing from your petition (Docket

No. FAA

− 2015

− 3850). This information is necessary for the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) to process your petition.

 Describe the aircraft make(s), model(s) , and type(s)(i.e., fi xed-wing, rotorcraft, lighter-than-air) for the proposed UAS operati on. The description(s) should include the maximum weight (including pa yload). This information can be located in the aircraft manual(s).

Please submit the additional information (non-proprietary) to your docket at www.regulations.gov. Once your information has b een submitted, please also send a copy of the requested information (and any proprietary in formation), as well as your comment tracking number from regulations.gov via e-mail to 333exe mptions@faa.gov. If you want us to process your request any further, we must receive the in formation described above by 12/7/15. If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (202) 267-2999.

Sincerely,
/S/
Brenda Robeson Program Analyst
Before the Third Division,

November 17, 1955

No. 59460.

protest 258812-K (New York).

#### D. C. Andrews *&*Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

*309Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

An examination of the record failing to disclose anything that would warrant the court in disturbing the finding of the collector, which was presumptively correct, the protest was overruled.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of J. Crew Group, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended August 1, 2009
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), we, Millard Drexler, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and James Scully, Chief Administrative Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of each of our knowledge:



| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | -- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                        
|--------------------------------------------------------
|Date: September 9, 2009                                 
|                                                        
|/S/ MILLARD DREXLER                                     
|Millard Drexler                                         
|Chief Executive Officer                                 
|                                                        
|/S/ JAMES SCULLY                                        
|James Scully                                            
|Chief Administrative Officer and Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Document

Exhibit 10.25
FIRST AMENDMENT OF THE
CNO BOARD OF DIRECTORS
DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN


THIS FIRST AMENDMENT OF THE CNO BOARD OF DIRECTORS DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN (Amended and Restated Effective as of January 1, 2017) (the “Plan”) is made by CNO Financial Group, Inc. (the “Company”), pursuant to action of the Human Resources and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, effective January 1, 2021 (the “Effective Date”).


WHEREAS, the Company maintains the Plan; and


WHEREAS, Section 10.2 of the Plan authorizes the Company to amend the Plan; and


WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan to allow participants to elect for scheduled distributions on or after January 1, 2021 to be paid in up to ten annual installments;


NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the power reserved to the Company under Section 10.2 of the Plan, the Plan is hereby amended, effective as of January 1, 2021, by replacing Section 6.3(a) in its entirety with the following:


“(a)      Scheduled Distribution Election.  Each Participant shall be entitled to elect to receive a Scheduled Distribution from his or her Account for each Plan Year. In the case of a Participant who has elected to receive a Scheduled Distribution, on the applicable Payment Date such Participant shall receive the Distributable Amount with respect to the applicable Plan Year's deferrals, including earnings thereon, which have been elected by the Participant to be subject to such Scheduled Distribution election in accordance with Section 3.4. The Committee shall determine the earliest commencement date that may be elected by the Participant for each Scheduled Distribution and such date shall be indicated on the Participant Election. The Participant may elect to receive the Scheduled Distribution in a single lump sum or substantially equal annual installments over a period of up to five years (or ten years for deferral elections or modifications effective on or after January 1, 2021), or in any combination of the two.  A Participant may delay and/or change the form of a Scheduled Distribution, provided such revised election complies with the requirements of Section 3.4.”


            All other provisions of the Plan remain unchanged. 


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this amendment to be executed on its behalf by the undersigned officer this 18th day of December 2020, but effective as of January 1, 2021.


						
	CNO FINANCIAL GROUP, INC.
		
		
	By:	/s/ Yvonne K. Franzese
	Name:	Yvonne K. Franzese
	Title:	EVP, Chief Human Resources Officer
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 142 Filed 10/10/2003 Page 1 of 4
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 142 Filed 10/10/2003 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 142 Filed 10/10/2003 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 142 Filed 10/10/2003 Page 4 of 4
# C_2016211EN.01002501.xml

| 13.6.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 211/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.6.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 211/25

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kúria (Hungary) lodged on 20 February 2016 — Damien Zöldség, Gyümölcs Kereskedelmi és Tanácsadó Kft. v Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatóság

(Case C-114/16)

(2016/C 211/31)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Kúria

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Damien Zöldség, Gyümölcs Kereskedelmi és Tanácsadó Kft.

Respondent: Nemzeti Adó- és Vámhivatal Fellebbviteli Igazgatóság

Question referred

Are the provisions of Articles 167, 168, 178 and 179 of the VAT Directive (1) to be interpreted to the effect that the revenue authority is required to recognise, in the course of a tax audit, a taxable person’s right of deduction in circumstances in which, although there is no indication in the taxable person’s VAT return of the tax paid, the taxable person possesses invoices consistent with that directive and, during the audit, requests recognition of its right of deduction?

---

(1)  Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax (OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1).

---
Exhibit 31



CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Nancy M. Harvey, certify that:



1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TenFold Corporation;



2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;



3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;



4. I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:



(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;



(b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls
and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and



(c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and



5. I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and



(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                                                               
|---------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Nancy M. Harvey                                            
|Nancy M. Harvey                                                
|President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer
|April 29, 2004
# C_2016260EN.01001601.xml

| 18.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 260/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 260/16

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht München I (Germany) lodged on 4 April 2016 — Criminal proceedings against Ionel Opria

(Case C-188/16)

(2016/C 260/21)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Landgericht München I

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Ionel Opria

Other party: Staatsanwaltschaft München I

Question referred

Question referred

Must Article 2, Article 3(1)(c) and Article 6(1) and (3) of Directive 2012/13/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2012 on the right to information in criminal proceedings (1) be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State under which, in criminal proceedings against an accused person with no fixed domicile or residence in that Member State, a penalty order made against the accused can be served on a person appointed by him as being authorised to accept service on his behalf, with the result that the penalty order acquires the force of res judicata upon expiry of the (two-week) period for lodging an objection, which begins to run from the time of service on the authorised person, even where, in accordance with the legislation of that Member State, any such accused person who lodges a written objection against the penalty order with the court having jurisdiction within two weeks of actually becoming aware of that order must ex officio have his position restored to the status quo ante, with the result that, following the adoption of the decision to restore the status quo ante, proceedings must continue as they would in the case of an objection lodged in good time?

1

res judicata

ex officio

status quo ante

status quo ante

---

(1)  OJ 2012 L 142, p. 1.

1

---