alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 13.2




CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.


SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE


SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002




In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Alto Palermo Sociedad Anónima (APSA) (the “Company”) for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Matias Gaivironsky, as Chief Financial Officer of the company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;







(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Alto Palermo Sociedad AnónimaOctober 26, 2012.
By:
/s/ Matias GaivironskyMatias GaivironskyChief Financial Officer


This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except as to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
# C_2019187EN.01000401.xml

| 3.6.2019 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 187/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.6.2019

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 187/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 26 March 2019 — European Commission v Italian Republic, Republic of Lithuania

(Case C-621/16 P) (1)

(Appeal - Rules on languages - Open competition for the recruitment of administrators - Notice of competition - Administrators (AD 5) - Administrators (AD 6) in the field of data protection - Knowledge of languages - Restriction of the choice of language 2 of the competitions to English, French and German - Language of communication with the European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) - Regulation No 1 - Staff Regulations - Discrimination based on language - Justification - Interests of the service - Judicial review)

(2019/C 187/05)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: L. Pignataro-Nolin and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents)

Other parties to the proceedings: Italian Republic (represented by: G. Palmieri, acting as Agent, and by P. Gentili, avvocato dello Stato), Republic of Lithuania

Intervener in support of the defendant: Kingdom of Spain (represented by: M.J. García-Valdecasas Dorrego, acting as Agent)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Italian Republic; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Commission to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the Italian Republic;

| 3. | Orders the Kingdom of Spain to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Kingdom of Spain to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 46, 13.2.2017.

---
IPAC Operational Metrics for February 2023

- Sheet1
EXHIBIT 23.3

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS

March 8, 2011

GMX Resources Inc.

One Benham Place,
Suite 600

9400 North Broadway

Oklahoma City, OK 73114

Re: Consent of
Independent Petroleum Engineers

To whom it may concern:

MHA Petroleum Consultants hereby consents to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (No. 333-106311, 333-150356, 333-151916, and 333-167582) on Form S-8 of GMX Resources Inc. and
registration statements (No. 333-134911, 333-149710, 333-150368 and 333-171521) on Form S-3 of the references to our report relating to the proved oil and natural gas reserves of GMX Resources Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2010, and to
the reference to our firm as experts in such registration statements with respect to such report.



|                                
|--------------------------------
|Very truly yours,               
|                                
|MHA PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS       
|                                
|/s/ John W. Arsenault           
|John W. Arsenault Vice
President
If you have any questions concerning a letter you received requesting repayment of a no

 Federal debt, please call the number corresponding to the country from which you are calli After the initial greeting, please press 2.

Argentina 0800-333-0506 Malaysia Australia 1800-064-355 Mexico 00Brazil 0800-891-6025 Mexico 00China 10-800-130-0720 Mexico 00China 10800-713-0746 Netherlands Colombia 01-800-700-1676 New Zealand Costa Rica 0800-013-0868 Norway Cyprus 8009-7188 Panama 00Denmark 8088-6023 Philippines 1-Finland 08001-14152 Portugal France 0800-90-3718 Singapore Germany 0800-180-7751 South Africa Hong Kong 800-908-991 South Korea – Dacom Hungary 06-800-17996 South Korea – KT Indonesia 001-803-015-201-7033 Spain Ireland 1800-677-383 Sweden Israel 180-931-5339 Taiwan Italy 800-78-7941 Thailand 001-8Japan 00531-13-1022 United Kingdom Luxembourg 8002-5241 Venezuela Macao 0800-297
----

**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF      2002**

|   | 1. | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended                and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Registrant as of and for the periods presented in the                Report. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                            | Lynda                J. Nahra                        |
|--------------------------------|------------------------------------------------------|
|                           | Lynda                J. Nahra                        |
|                           | President                and Chief Executive Officer |
|                           |                                                 |
| /s/                            | Charles                G. Baltuskonis                |
|                           | Charles                G. Baltuskonis                |
|                           | Executive                Vice President and          |
|                           | Chief                Financial Officer               |
| August                13, 2007 |

----
# C_2018436EN.01003601.xml

| 3.12.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 436/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.12.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 436/36

---

Judgment of the General Court of 18 October 2018 — Terna v Commission

(Case T-387/16) (1)

((Financial aid - Projects of common interest in the field of trans-European energy networks - Determination of the final amount of the financial aid - Audit report identifying irregularities - Ineligible costs - Obligation to state reasons - Legitimate expectations - Proportionality))

(2018/C 436/49)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: Terna — Rete elettrica nazionale SpA (Rome, Italy) (represented by: A. Police, L. Di Via, F. Degni, F. Covone and D. Carria, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: O. Beynet, L. Di Paolo, A. Tokár and G. Gattinara, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application based on Article 263 TFEU seeking annulment of the letters of 6 July 2015, 23 May and 14 June 2016 of the Commission relating to certain costs incurred in the context of two projects in the field of trans-European energy networks (Projects 209-E255/09-ENER/09/TEN-E-S 12.564583 and 2007-E221/07/2007-TREN/07TEN-E-S 07.91403) following the grant of financial aid by the Commission to the applicant.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Terna — Rete elettrica nazionale SpA to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Terna — Rete elettrica nazionale SpA to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 326, 5.9.2016.

---
Case No. 5,246.

#### The GARONNE.

[Blatchf. Pr. Cas. 132.] 1

District Court, S. D. New York.

March, 1802.

Pkize — Violation ok Blockade.

Vessel and cargo condemned as enemy property, and for a violation of the blockade.

In admiralty.

BETTS, District Judge.

This vessel, as in the last case, being of small value, and unfit, from her size and capacity, to be sent to a Northern port for adjudication, was, on her capture off the port of Galveston, Texas, December 11, 1801, by the United States frigate Santee, Captain Eagle commanding, ordered to be appraised by naval surveyors, and to be broken up and appropriated to the use and service of the United States, and her cargo to be forwarded to this port by 'the United States steamship Supply, and her master and crew by the United States steamship Connecticut. The vessel and cargo were owned by a citizen and resident of New Orleans. The cargo was consigned to a resident in Brownsville, Texas. The master knew that New Orleans was under blockade, and that the coast of Texas was also, but he had no personal warning of the fact.

No claimant interposes to make claim to, or defend the vessel or cargo in this suit. The evidence, on the ship’s papers and the preparatory proofs, leaves no ground to doubt that the vessel and cargo were both enemy property at the time of capture, and also had, on that voyage, intentionally evaded the blockade of the port of New Orleans, with intent to enter and violate the blockade of the port of Brownsville, in Texas. Both are accordingly condemned as prize of war. The proceeds of the vessel are to be decreed to be paid into the registry of the court for distribution pursuant to law; and execution is to be awarded to make sale of the cargo arrested, and, on return of the proceeds thereof into court, they will be distributed, with those of the vessel, among the captors.
**Exhibit 10.79****Annual Base Salaries of Named Executive Officers**     In February 2008, the 2008 annual base salaries of Messrs. Jacobs, Dobson, Landrum, Jines andHerndon, each of whom is a named executive officer, were approved by the Compensation Committee(and the Board, in the case of Mr. Jacobs).     **2008 Base Salary****Named Executive Officer** **(effective April 1, 2008)**Mark M. Jacobs  President and Chief Executive Officer $910,000Rick L. Dobson  Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer $515,000Brian Landrum  Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer $665,000Michael L. Jines  Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary $430,000D. Rogers Herndon  Senior Vice President, Strategic Planning and Business Development $350,000
# C_2017202EN.01000802.xml

| 26.6.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 202/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.6.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 202/8

---

Appeal brought on 9 December 2016 by Foodcare sp. z o.o. against the judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 5 October 2016 in Case T-456/15: Foodcare sp. z o.o. v EUIPO

(Case C-639/16 P)

(2017/C 202/12)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Foodcare sp. z o.o. (represented by: M. Żabińska, radca prawny)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office, Dariusz Michalczewski

Other parties to the proceedings:

By order of 11 May 2017 the Court of Justice (Tenth Chamber) held that the appeal was inadmissible.

---
Before the First Division,

June 4, 1963

No. 67782.

#### Joseph Markovits, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 60/1219, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of bridal headdresses similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Novik & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(45 Cust. Ct. 183, C.D. 2221), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained. '
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA No. DA 2 1 - 0 029 STATE OF MONTANA,

Plaintiff and Appellee,
v. JOSE PERALTA,

Defendant and Appellant,

**ORDER** Upon consideration of Appellant’s unopposed motion for extension of time, and good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Appellant is granted an extension of time until March 27 , 202 2 , within which to prepare, file, and serve Appellant’s opening brief on appeal.

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

February 14 2022

02/14/2022

Case Number: DA 21-0029
# C_2016326EN.01001301.xml

| 5.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/13

---

Appeal brought on 16 June 2016 by the Portuguese Republic against the order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 19 April 2016 in Case T-556/15 Portugal v Commission

(Case C-339/16 P)

(2016/C 326/23)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Portuguese Republic (represented by: L. Inez Fernandes, M. Figueiredo, P. Estêvão and J. Saraiva de Almeida, acting as Agents)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission

Other party to the proceedings:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Set aside the judgment under appeal in so far as, in that judgment, the General Court accepted the plea of inadmissibility raised by the Commission in the present proceedings; |
| --- | --- |

—

Set aside the judgment under appeal in so far as, in that judgment, the General Court accepted the plea of inadmissibility raised by the Commission in the present proceedings;

| — | Declare that the appeal of the contested decision has been validly brought within the period laid down in Article 263 TFEU. |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that the appeal of the contested decision has been validly brought within the period laid down in Article 263 TFEU.

| — | Order the European Commission to pay all of the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the European Commission to pay all of the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The Portuguese Republic considers that the decision is invalid on the following grounds:

A — First ground — Calculation of the time-limit for bringing proceedings against the decision of 20 July 2015

A — First ground —

First argument

First argument

Infringement of Article 263 TFEU.

Second argument

Second argument

Calculation of the time-limit for bringing proceedings from the date of notification of the final decision on 20 July 2015.

B — Second Ground — Calculation of the time-limit for bringing proceedings from the date of publication of the contested decision in the Official Journal

B — Second Ground —

First argument

First argument

The wording of Article 263(6) TFEU.

Second argument

Second argument

The consistent practice of publishing such decisions and identical prior legal proceedings.

C — Third Ground — The General Court erred in law in so far as it did not favour an interpretation that did not result in lapse of the right to bring proceedings

C — Third Ground —

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

: CIVIL ACTION NOS.

:

WULFECK : 02-3893

WARREN : 02-3898

CHARNOCK. : 02-3970

MOHR : 02-4117

PALLERA, et al. : 02-4170

CORREA, et al. : 02-4195

DAHL, et al. : 02-4239

EMERSON, et al. : 02-4290

JUROTICH : 02-4322

:

VS. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION, et al. :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of July, 2002, the Court having been previously

advised that the above action cannot proceed to trial and disposition because of the following

reason:

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending disposition of a related

action.

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending determination of

arbitration proceedings.

[ ] - Interlocutory appeal filed.

[ X ] - Other: Case is placed into suspense pending receipt of the Case

Transfer Order from the Judicial Panel on Multi District Litigation

transferring case to District of Minnesota..

It is

ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this action closed for statistical purposes and

place the matter in the Civil Suspense File, and it is

Case 2:02-cv-04290-CN Document 2 Filed 07/11/2002 Page 1 of 2
FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction; and that the case be

restored to the trial docket when the action is in a status so that it may proceed to final

disposition; this order shall not prejudice the rights of the parties to this litigation.

BY THE COURT:

________________________________________

Clarence C. Newcomer, Judge

Case 2:02-cv-04290-CN Document 2 Filed 07/11/2002 Page 2 of 2
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
 
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>        
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: OF J. CREW OPERATING CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES.
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-31-1998
<CASH>                                          22,069
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   20,754
<ALLOWANCES>                                   (5,579)
<INVENTORY>                                    277,207
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               385,373
<PP&E>                                         195,166
<DEPRECIATION>                                (69,236)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 529,065
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          276,261
<BONDS>                                        220,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (12,187)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   529,065
<SALES>                                        554,249
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               561,652
<CGS>                                          319,652
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  564,753      
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              22,612
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (25,713)
<INCOME-TAX>                                    10,300
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (15,413)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    15,413
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Exhibit 31.1

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Nancy Duitch, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Vertical Branding, Inc.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

4.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a.

Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; and

b.

Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c.

Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

a.

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

b.

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls.

|              |                        
|------------- | -----------------------
|April 9, 2007
|              | /s/ NANCY DUITCH       
|              | Nancy Duitch           
|              | Chief Executive Officer
|
<PAGE>


                                                                    Exhibit 10.1

                         PROMISSORY NOTE
                         ---------------


$3,220,000.00                                                BALTIMORE, MARYLAND
                                                                    JULY 29 1999


ON DEMAND, the undersigned promises to pay to the order of Chapman Capital
Management Holdings, Inc. Three million two hundred and twenty thousand dollars
($3,220,000,00) at its offices in Baltimore, Maryland together with interest
thereon from the date hereof until paid at the rate of 5.45% per annum.


                                         /S/ NATHAN A. CHAPMAN, JR.
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         CHAPMAN HOLDINGS, INC.
                                         NATHAN A. CHAPMAN, JR.
                                         PRESIDENT