alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 13.2  Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with this Amendment to Annual Report for Fiscal 2011 Ended August 31, 2011 of Golden Goliath Resources Ltd., company organized under the British Columbia Corporations Act(the Company) on Form 20-F as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Stephen Pearce, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  /s/ Stephen Pearce Stephen Pearce, Chief Financial Officer   Date: June 25, 2012
Effluent Limitations Guidelines and Standards for

the Oil and Gas Extraction Point Source Category

CBI REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2014-0598

DCN: SGE01170

THE FOLLOWING HAS BEEN REMOVED BECAUSE IT

CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL BUSINESS INFORMATION (CBI) PER 40 CFR PART 2, SUBPART B

.
<PAGE>

EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A of Integrated
Healthcare Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended December 31,
2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company at the dates and for the period indicated

      This Certificate has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.


                                      INTEGRATED HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS, INC.

Dated: February 25, 2009              By:  /s/ Kenneth K. Westbrook
                                           ------------------------------
                                           Kenneth K. Westbrook
                                           Chief Executive Officer
Payment Collection RIA SIA Zero Dollar Total

October 2016 21,822 73,149 2,705 76 - 97,752

November 2016 22,352 71,038 3,206 78 - 96,674

December 2016 32,074 78,201 3,160 103 - 113,538

Totals 76,248 222,388 9,071 257 - 307,964

 -

 50,000

 100,000

 150,000

 200,000

 250,000

 300,000

 350,000

# of transactions

Transaction Type

IPAC Transaction Count

October 2016

November 2016

December 2016

Totals
No. 49069.

#### Protests 57839-K, etc., of Chas. L. Huisking & Co., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
APPENDIX 10. REPEALED Historical Note Adopted effective May 14, 1979 (Supp. 79 - 1). Amended effective July 9, 1980 (Supp. 80 - 4). Amended effective June 19, 1981 (Supp. 81 - 3). Repealed by final rulemaking at 15

A.A.R. 281, effective March 7, 2009 (Supp. 09 - 1).
***New Data Sources Coming Soon to the Do Not Pay Portal!**

# image1.jpeg

# image2.jpeg
Order filed October 7, 2020

In The 

### Court of Appeals

For The 

### First District of Texas

___________ NO. 01

- 19

- 00608

- CR

____________ TAIRON JOSE MONJARAS , Appellant

V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee

On Appeal from the 232nd Dist rict Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 1614762



### ORDERThis court has determined, pursuant to T exas Rule of Appellate Procedure 34.5(f) and 34.6(g)(2), that it must inspect the original of State's Exhibit 1 and State's Exhibit 2.

The exhibit clerk of the 232nd District Court is directed to deliver to the Clerk of this court the original of State's Exhibit 1 and State's Exhibit 2, on or before October 12, 2020. The Clerk of this court is directed to receive, maintain, and keep safe this origi nal exhibit; to deliver it to the justices of this court for their inspection; and, upon completion of inspection, to return the original of State's Exhibit 1 and State's Exhibit 2, to the clerk of the 232nd District Court

.

PER CURIAM
P anels consists of Justice s Kelly, Goodman , and Countiss
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


      In connection with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Integrated
Healthcare Holdings, Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended December 31,
2006, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), the
undersigned, in the capacity and on the date indicated below, hereby certifies
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (i) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (ii) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company at the dates and for the period indicated

      This Certificate has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.


                                        INTEGRATED HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS, INC.

Dated: February 20, 2007                By:  /s/ Steven R. Blake
                                             ------------------------------
                                             Steven R. Blake
                                             Chief Financial Officer
# 2018_09 Pivot Table 5B

&"-,Bold"&12&K0000CCMTS Table 5, Reconciliation Support	

# 5

&F	

&A	&P/&N
# C_2020036EN.01002402.xml

| 3.2.2020 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 36/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.2.2020

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 36/24

---

Judgment of the General Court of 12 December 2019 — OS v Commission

(Case T-528/16) (1)

(Civil Service - Reform of the Staff Regulations and of the CEOS that entered into force on 1 January 2014 - Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1023/2013 - Solidarity levy applicable from 1 January 2014 - Suspension of application of the method for updating remuneration for 2013 and 2014)

(2020/C 36/29)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicant: OS (represented by: J.-N. Louis, R. Metz and D. Verbeke, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission (represented by: G. Gattinara and L. Radu Bouyon, acting as Agents)

Interveners in support of the defendant: European Parliament (represented by: E. Taneva and M. Ecker, acting as Agents), Council of the European Union (represented by: M. Bauer and R. Meyer, acting as Agents)

Re:

Application under Article 270 TFEU seeking annulment of the decision fixing the applicant’s remuneration for January 2014, as given specific expression in the salary slip for that month sent to him on 13 January 2014, which is the first salary slip to apply, with regard to the applicant, Article 65(4) and Article 66a of the Staff Regulations stemming from Article 1(44) and (46) of Regulation (EU, Euratom) No 1023/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2013 (OJ 2013 L 287, p.15) providing, respectively, for the suspension of the application of the method for updating remuneration for 2013 and 2014 and the introduction of a solidarity levy from 1 January 2014.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders OS to pay the costs; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders OS to pay the costs;

| 3. | Orders the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Parliament and the Council of the European Union to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 7, 12.1.2015 (case initially registered before the Civil Service Tribunal of the European Union under number F-122/14 and transferred to the General Court of the European Union on 1 September 2016).

---
854098.28.01 10/16/02 4:09 PM

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

BARBARA WEST and JESSE R. WEST :

: CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-4242

Plaintiffs, :

:

v. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION;

BAYER AG;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE;

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM

:

:

:

:

:

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

:

Defendants. :

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of the Court:

Kindly enter the appearances of Hope S. Freiwald, Aline Fairweather, Erin

Brennan and Kirstin J. Miller as attorneys for defendant SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a

GlaxoSmithKline.

Respectfully Submitted,

_____________________________ _____________________________

Hope S. Freiwald Aline Fairweather

_____________________________ _____________________________

Erin Brennan Kirstin J. Miller

DECHERT PRICE & RHOADS

4000 Bell Atlantic Tower

1717 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2793

(215) 994-4000

Case 2:02-cv-04242-RK Document 11 Filed 10/21/2002 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANTTO**

**SECTION 906 OF THESARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report ofNational Equipment Services, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q forthe period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and ExchangeCommission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Joseph M. Gullion, ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, asadopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to myknowledge:

 

(1)          TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), asapplicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)          Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 
| /s/ JOSEPH M. GULLION   |   |
|-------------------------|--------|
|                    |
| Joseph M. Gullion       |
| Chief Executive Officer |
| May 13, 2003            |

 

----
(Reap. Dec. 10945)

#### Hemisphere Int’l Corp. *v.*United States

Entry No. 5845.

(Decided April 8, 1965)

*Sharp é Bogan*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Donlon, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the undersigned, subject to the approval of the Court:

> 1. That the subject merchandise consists of hardboard exported from Sweden as to which the Secretary of the Treasury issued a finding of dumping, published in 89 TD 197, TD 53567, made pursuant to the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C. 160, et seq.).

> 2. That pursuant to Section 168 of said Antidumping Act, the appraiser reported the purchase price (Sec. 162) and the foreign market value (Sec. 164) *612as to the merchandise listed on Schedule A attached hereto and made a part hereof.

> 3. That pursuant to Sections 500 and 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, the appraiser appraised all of the merchandise in the appeals for appraisement enumerated on Schedule A for regular duty purposes.

> 4. That the plaintiff duly filed appeals for reappraisement as to the values referred to in the above paragraphs Nos. 2 and 3.

> 5. That at the times relevant herein the purchase price and the foreign market value under the said Antidumping Act are as specified in the aforesaid Schedule A attached hereto.

> 6. That as to all other items of merchandise not identified on Schedule A, the appraiser’s reports of purchase price and of foreign market value are correct. ' 7. That the appraiser’s findings of value under the provisions of Section 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, are correct.

> 8. That said appeals are submitted for decision upon this stipulation and said Schedule A.

Upon the agreed facts, I find foreign market value, as defined in section 164 of the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C. § 164), for the merchandise described in schedule A, attached to and made a part of this decision, and the purchase price thereof, within section 162 of said act (19 U.S.C. § 162), to be as specified in said schedule A.

As to all other items of merchandise not identified in schedule A, I find the foreign market values and purchase prices to be as reported by the appraiser.

In all other respects, the values of all merchandise are as returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : Criminal No. ___________________

:

v. : Date Filed: _____________________

:

WILLIAM GRAY : Violations:

:

: 18 U.S.C. § 922(o)

: (possession of machineguns

: - 1 count)

: 26 U.S.C. § 5861(d) 

: (possession of unregistered machineguns 

: - 1 count)

:

: Notice of additional factors

: Notice of forfeiture

INFORMATION

COUNT ONE 

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY CHARGES THAT:

On or about September 27, 2004, at Lansdale, in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania,

defendant

WILLIAM GRAY

did knowingly possess four machineguns, that is:

1. An MP-40, 9mm submachine gun, serial number 74247;

2. A Sten, 9mm submachine gun, serial number 1L7074;

3. An AK-47, 7.62 X 39mm rifle, serial number A37324; and

4. An M-2, .30 caliber carbine, serial number 182910. 

In violation of Title 18, United States Code, Sections 922(o) and 924(a)(2).

Case 2:05-cr-00001-BWK Document 1 Filed 01/03/05 Page 1 of 5
2

Case 2:05-cr-00001-BWK Document 1 Filed 01/03/05 Page 2 of 5
3

COUNT TWO 

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FURTHER CHARGES THAT:

On or about September 27, 2004, at Lansdale, in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania,

defendant

WILLIAM GRAY

knowingly possessed four firearms, that is four machineguns, not registered to him in the

National Firearms Registration and Transfer Record, specifically:

1. An MP-40, 9mm submachine gun, serial number 74247;

2. A Sten, 9mm submachine gun, serial number 1L7074;

3. An AK-47, 7.62 X 39mm rifle, serial number A37324; and

4. An M-2, .30 caliber carbine, serial number 182910. 

In violation of Title 26, United States Code, Sections 5845(a) and (b), 5861(d), and 5871.

Case 2:05-cr-00001-BWK Document 1 Filed 01/03/05 Page 3 of 5
4

NOTICE OF ADDITIONAL FACTORS

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FURTHER CHARGES THAT:

1. In committing the offenses charged in Counts One and Two of this Information,

defendant:

WILLIAM GRAY

a. Committed the offenses involving four firearms, as described in U.S.S.G. 

§ 2K2.1(b)(1)(A).

Case 2:05-cr-00001-BWK Document 1 Filed 01/03/05 Page 4 of 5
5

NOTICE OF FORFEITURE

THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FURTHER CHARGES THAT:

As a result of the violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 922(o) set forth in

Count One of this Information, the defendant

WILLIAM GRAY

shall forfeit to the United States of America, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 924(d) and 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2461(c), all firearms involved in the commission of this offense, including, but not limited to: 

1. An MP-40, 9mm submachine gun, serial number 74247;

2. A Sten, 9mm submachine gun, serial number 1L7074;

3. An AK-47, 7.62 X 39mm rifle, serial number A37324; and

4. An M-2, .30 caliber carbine, serial number 182910. 

All pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 2461(c) and Title 18, United States

Code, Section 924(d).

 

PATRICK L. MEEHAN

United States Attorney

Case 2:05-cr-00001-BWK Document 1 Filed 01/03/05 Page 5 of 5
**Exhibit 13.2**

 

**Certification**

 

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)**

 

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersignedofficer of Allianz Aktiengesellschaft, a German company (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that: 

 

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the “Report”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Date: ****April 6, 2006
No. 63554.

protests 59/4875, 59/1014, and 58/22786 (New York).

#### Burleigh Brooks, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, O. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of photographic lenses similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 61631, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-10108 

USDC No. 5:94-CV-237-C

__________________

WILLIAM BRYAN FROUST,

 Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

UNIDENTIFIED CRIBBS ET AL.,

 Defendants-Appellees.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

--------------------

July 21, 1995

Before DAVIS, SMITH and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

Because process had not issued and no defendant had filed an

answer, William Bryan Froust had the right to dismiss the instant

suit voluntarily without prejudice. FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a). 

Therefore, Froust's motion to appeal IFP is GRANTED. Jackson v.

Dallas Police Dep't, 811 F.2d 260, 261 (5th Cir. 1986). The

order of dismissal is MODIFIED to reflect that the suit is

DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE and AFFIRMED AS MODIFIED. The appeal

is DISMISSED AS MOOT.
Exhibit 99.2

                     Certification pursuant to Section 1350
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
      --------------------------------------------------------------------


In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  DA Consulting Group, Inc. (the
"COMPANY")  on  Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2003, as filed with the
Securities  and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "REPORT"), I, Dennis
C.  Fairchild,  Chief  Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Sec.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002,  that:

     1)   the  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended; and

     2)   the  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
          material  respects,  the financial condition and results of operations
          of  the  Company.





                                       /s/ Dennis C. Fairchild
                           ------------------------------------------------
                                           Dennis C. Fairchild
                           Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer
                              (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
                                         Date:  May 20, 2003




A  signed  original  of  this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  DA  Consulting  Group,  Inc. and will be retained by DA Consulting
Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon  its  request.


                                       20
<PAGE>
# C_2015406EN.01003802.xml

| 7.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 406/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 406/38

---

Action brought on 28 September 2015 — Kozmetika Afrodita v OHIM — Núñez Martín and Machado Montesinos (AFRODITA COSMETICS)

(Case T-575/15)

(2015/C 406/39)

Language in which the application was lodged: Slovene

Parties

Applicant: Kozmetika Afrodita d.o.o. (Rogaška Slatina, Slovenia) (represented by: B. Grešak, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Other parties to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Pedro Nuñez Martín (Madrid, Spain) and Carmen Guillermina Machado Montesinos (Madrid, Spain

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Applicant for the contested mark: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word element ‘AFRODITA COSMETICS’ — Registration No 11 798 287

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 28 July 2015 in Case R 2578/2014-4.

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Rule 50(2)(h) of Regulation No 2868/95. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Rule 50(2)(h) of Regulation No 2868/95.

---
**Exhibit 23.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No.333-113954) pertaining to the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan, 2004 Non-Employee Directors’ Stock OptionPlan, 2004 Employee Stock Purchase Plan and 2002 Equity Incentive Plan of Anadys Pharmaceuticals,Inc., in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-120647) pertaining to the 2004 EquityIncentive Plan, 2004 Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan and 2004 Employee Stock PurchasePlan of Anadys Pharmaceuticals, Inc., in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-129716)pertaining to the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan and 2004 Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Option Plan ofAnadys Pharmaceuticals, Inc., in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 No. 333-137114) pertaining tothe 2004 Equity Incentive Plan, 2004 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, 2004 Non-Employee Directors’Stock Option Plan and Inducement Stock Option Agreement by and between the Registrant and James L.Freddo, M.D., in the Registration Statement (Form S-3/A No. 333-124231) of Anadys Pharmaceuticals,Inc. for the registration of its common stock of Anadys Pharmaceuticals, Inc., in the RegistrationStatement (Form S-3 No. 333-132729) of Anadys Pharmaceuticals, Inc. for the registration of itscommon stock, preferred stock, debt securities, and warrants of Anadys Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and inthe related Prospectus of our reports dated March 2, 2007, with respect to: (1) the consolidatedfinancial statements of Anadys Pharmaceuticals, Inc., and (2) Anadys Pharmaceuticals, Inc.management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, and theeffectiveness of internal control over financial reporting of Anadys Pharmaceuticals, Inc.,included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2006./s/ Ernst & Young LLPSan Diego, California