alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 13.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with this Annual Report for Fiscal 2013 Ended August 31, 2013 of Golden Goliath Resources Ltd., company organized under the British Columbia Corporations Act(the Company) on Form 20-F as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Stephen Pearce, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Stephen Pearce

Stephen Pearce, Chief Financial Officer





Date: December 23, 2013
SOP No.: QC-11 Page 1 of 9
 SOP No.: QC-11 Page 2 of 9
 SOP No.: QC-11 Page 3 of 9
 SOP No.: QC-11 Page 4 of 9
 SOP No.: QC-11 Page 5 of 9

 TITLE: Ion Trap Confirmation Guidelines

 Revision: Original Replaces: NA Effective: 3/2/94

365 > 1% of mass 198 

441 Present but less than 443

442 Base peak or 50% of 198

443 15-24% of mass 442

Sometimes ions do not fall within the range defined in Table 1. Establish a historical

profile of range within which to expect the relative percent abundance for ions of

DFTPP under 100. Replace this range as a criteria for ions under 100 amu in Table

1.

The response and retention time of the daily DFTPP must be evaluated before sample

analysis begins. If the response is less than 80% of the reference response (i.e., the
 SOP No.: QC-11 Page 6 of 9
 SOP No.: QC-11 Page 7 of 9
 SOP No.: QC-11 Page 8 of 9
 SOP No.: QC-11 Page 9 of 9

 TITLE: Ion Trap Confirmation Guidelines

 Revision: Original Replaces: NA Effective: 3/2/94

Martha Lamont 2/24/94

Approved By: Martha Lamont Date

Technical Director, PDP

USDA/AMS

8700 Centreville Road, St. 200

Manassas, VA 22110

(703) 330-2300

Robert Epstein 2/24/94
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS4560 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
No. 51312.

#### Protests 16279-K, etc., of New York Merchandise Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

From the uncontradicted evidence the court found that the merchandise consists of Christmas tree lamps similar in all material respects to those the subject of *New York Merchandise Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(16 Cust. Ct. 148, C. D. 1003), wherein like lamps were held to be parts of Christmas tree lighting sets. On the established facts it was held that the merchandise which was entered for consumption or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption prior to January 1, 1939, is dutiable at 35 percent under paragraph 353, and that the merchandise entered for consumption or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption subsequent to that date is dutiable at 25 percent by virtue of T. D. 49753. The protests were sustained to this extent.
Before the Third Division,

December 4, 1959

No. 63566.

protests 132212-K, etc. (New York).

#### Popper Morson Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams*& *Co., Inc.*(40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Commerce

###### Foreign-Trade Zones Board

          - [S-170-2023]

On September 1, 2023, the Executive Secretary of the Foreign-Trade Zones (FTZ) Board docketed an application submitted by the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, grantee of FTZ 49, requesting to expand Subzone 49W subject to the existing activation limit of FTZ 49, on behalf of Getinge Group Logistics Americas LLC, in East Windsor, New Jersey.

                    The application was processed in accordance with the FTZ Act and Regulations, including notice in the                     **Federal Register**                     inviting public comment (88 FR 61499, September 7, 2023). The FTZ staff examiner reviewed the application and determined that it meets the criteria for approval. Pursuant to the authority delegated to the FTZ Board Executive Secretary (15 CFR 400.36(f)), the application to expand Subzone 49W was approved on November 6, 2023, subject to the FTZ                           ( print page 77262)                        Act and the Board's regulations, including section 400.13, and further subject to FTZ 49's 2,000-acre activation limit.                

Dated: November 6, 2023.

Elizabeth Whiteman,

Executive Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2023-24824 Filed 11-8-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**Chief Executive Officer Certification**

 

In connection with General Maritime Corporation’s (the “Company”)annual report on Form 10-K for the three months and fiscal year ending December31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the datehereof (the “Report”), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company,hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)   TheReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of theSecurities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)   Theinformation contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Date: March 13, 2006 |   /s/ Peter C. Georgiopoulos |                                              |
|----------------------|----------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|
|                 | Name:                                  | Peter C. Georgiopoulos                            |
|                 | Title:                                 | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and   President |
|                      |                                        |                                                   |  |

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separatedisclosure document.

 

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MATHEW and ANSJE H. CORREA :

: CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-CV-4195

Plaintiffs, :

:

v. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION;

BAYER AG;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE;

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM

:

:

:

:

:

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

:

Defendants. :

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of the Court:

Kindly enter the appearances of Hope S. Freiwald, Aline Fairweather, Erin

Brennan and Kirstin J. Miller as attorneys for defendant SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a

GlaxoSmithKline.

Respectfully Submitted,

_____________________________ _____________________________

Hope S. Freiwald Aline Fairweather

_____________________________ _____________________________

Erin Brennan Kirstin J. Miller

DECHERT PRICE & RHOADS

4000 Bell Atlantic Tower

1717 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2793

(215) 994-4000

Case 2:02-cv-04195-CN Document 8 Filed 09/20/2002 Page 1 of 1
##### 



Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

I, Jonathon K. Heffron of Bank United Corp. Litigation Contingent Payment
Rights Trust (the CPR Trust), certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that: (1) the Annual Report
on Form 10-K of the CPR Trust for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and (2) the
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the CPR Trust.

Dated: March 4, 2004

|                                            
|--------------------------------------------
|/s/ Jonathon K. Heffron

Jonathon K. Heffron
|Litigation Trustee                          

-41-
Exhibit 31.2I, Christopher R. Sachs, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Form 10-KSB/A of Hartville Group, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Dated: November 21, 2005       /s/ Christopher R. Sachs          Christopher R. Sachs,    Chief Accounting Officer
,mE /&ma- GEnaEagAG’ 

OF ?lrExAs 

Aus- 11. .J3sxAs 

.JOIXN BEN sEEPPEKD 

--=--m.“~~: Trimbie opinion HO. o-4817 

First Assistant State Re: Whether school district may compel 

S erintendent of 

"g 

bondholders to consent to refunaPu lit Instruction ing program. 

Austin, Texas 

Dear sirs 

we have received your letter of recent date in which you 

enclose a letter from Hr. Dana Williams Superintendent of the 

Tenaha Public Schools, to Dr. L. A. Woo&, State Superintendent. 

We quote the following from hr. WilU.am*s letter: 

"1. Where a school district has several separate bond issues and wishes to refund all of the 

bonds in one of those issues, and said school,d?strict obtains the consent of a majority of the 

bond ownersto such a refunding program, can such 

a school di@rict force the remaining'bondholdexs 

by way of manaansls to consent to such a refun*: - i 

program? 

!F&e%amplet Our school district has five 

.~ 

distinct; and separate bona issues. We are attempting to~refund one ,of these issnes-such issue Abeforce the'owners of the remaining $7,9OO.OC worth 

of these bonds to consent to this plan? These bonds 

have no option date for purchase.. 

We~are ,Informed that the StateBoard of Education owns 

for the benefit of the Permanent School Fiand more than one-third 

of all the outstar&Lng bonds of,the Tenaha'Independent School Msp 

trict. It is, .thus ,apparent that resort to-the Federal ~Rankrupt

Act may not be ha&for a plan of composltion,t3br the reason that 

the requirement of consent of 66-2/3# of the creditors would be 

lacking. We, therefore, confine ou#discusslon to the question 

whether under theilaws of Texas a school district may by legal process compel the holders of Its outstanding bonds to consent to a 

refunding program. 

Article 2789, Vernon's Annotated Civil Statutes, reads, 

ln part, as folltvwst 

"Where bonds have beenlegally issued, or may 

be hereafter issued, by any town or village incorporated for free school purposes only or any common 

school district, indep~endent school district, con-
# C_2016260EN.01001501.xml

| 18.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 260/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 260/15

---

Appeal brought on 4 February 2016 by Actega Terra GmbH against the order of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) delivered on 23 November 2015 in Case T-766/14 Actega Terra GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office

Actega Terra GmbH

European Union Intellectual Property Office

(Case C-63/16 P)

(2016/C 260/19)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Actega Terra GmbH (represented by: C. Onken, lawyer)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office, Heidelberger Druckmaschinen

Other party to the proceedings:

By order of 24 May 2016, the Court of Justice of the European Union (Seventh Chamber) dismissed the appeal and ordered the appellant to bear its own costs.

---
No. 67783.

#### Cade Grayson Co. and John L. Westland *&*Son, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 59/29203, etc. (Los Angeles).

*320Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *Falcon Sales Company*and *J. J. Murphy & Co.*v. *United States*(47 Cust. Ct. 129, *C.D. 2292), the*claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<PAGE>


Exhibit 32.1


                          WESTERN RESERVE BANCORP, INC.
                                   FORM 10-QSB
                           QUARTER ENDED JUNE 30, 2003

                       CERTIFICATION OF FINANCIAL RESULTS

I, Edward J. McKeon, the President and Chief Executive Officer of Western
Reserve Bancorp, Inc., hereby certify the following:

         o        This Form 10-QSB fully complies with the requirements of
                  Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
                  1934, and

         o        The information contained in the report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial position and results of
                  operations of Western Reserve Bancorp, Inc. as of and for the
                  periods presented.


                                           /s/ Edward J. McKeon
                                           Edward J. McKeon
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
                                           August 14, 2003
# C_2015294EN.01007902.xml

| 7.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/79 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/79

---

Action brought on 30 June 2015 — Alpex Pharma v OHIM — Astex Pharmaceuticals (ASTEX)

(Case T-355/15)

(2015/C 294/95)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Alpex Pharma SA (Mezzovico-Vira, Switzerland) (represented by: C. Bacchini and M. Mazzitelli, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Astex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Pleasanton, United States)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Applicant: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant:

Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘ASTEX’ — Application for registration No 1 0 8 05  281

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before OHIM:

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 28 April 2015 in Case R 593/2014-2

Contested decision:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order OHIM and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal, should it intervene, to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM and the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal, should it intervene, to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
# C_2016059EN.01002801.xml

| 15.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 59/28 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 59/28

---

Action brought on 25 November 2015 — HTTS v Council

(Case T-692/15)

(2016/C 059/30)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: HTTS Hanseatic Trade Trust & Shipping GmbH (Hamburg, Germany) (represented by: M. Schlingmann and M. Bever, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Order the Council of the European Union to pay the applicant damages in the amount of EUR 2 516 221,50 for material and non-material loss suffered due to the inclusion of the applicant in the list of persons, entities and bodies in Annex V to Regulation (EC) No 423/2007 and in Annex VIII to Regulation (EU) No 961/2010; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Council of the European Union to pay the applicant damages in the amount of EUR 2 516 221,50 for material and non-material loss suffered due to the inclusion of the applicant in the list of persons, entities and bodies in Annex V to Regulation (EC) No 423/2007 and in Annex VIII to Regulation (EU) No 961/2010;

| — | Order the Council of the European Union to pay interest for late payment in the amount of two percent over the rate of interest set by the European Central Bank for the principal refinancing operation from 17 October 2015 until payment in full of the above amount; |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Council of the European Union to pay interest for late payment in the amount of two percent over the rate of interest set by the European Central Bank for the principal refinancing operation from 17 October 2015 until payment in full of the above amount;

| — | Order the Council to pay the costs of the proceedings, including those incurred by the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Council to pay the costs of the proceedings, including those incurred by the applicant.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law, according to which it claims that the Council — which unlawfully included it in the list of persons, entities and bodies all of whose funds and economic resources were frozen — infringed provisions which protect individual interests and which do not confer discretion on it.

The applicant suffered material and non-material loss as a direct consequence of the restrictive measures that the Council unlawfully imposed on it.

---
**Exhibit 32.1**

**Chief Executive Officer Certification**

Inconnection with General Maritime Corporation’s (the “Company”) annual report onForm 10-K for the three months and fiscal year ending December 31, 2006, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer of the Company, herebycertifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 ofthe Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)          The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)          The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| Date:  March 1,  2007 | /s/ Peter C. Georgiopoulos |                                              |
|---------------------------------|----------------------------|---------------------------------------------------|
|                            | Name:                      | Peter C. Georgiopoulos                            |
|                            | Title:                     | Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and   President |
|                                 |                            |                                                   |  |

 

Theforegoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosuredocument.

----
Case 2:03-cr-00356-ER Document 134 Filed 04/23/09 Page 1 of 1