alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION
OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS 
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
2002

In connection
with the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Alto Palermo Sociedad Anónima (the “company”) for the year ended June 30,
2011 as filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), Alejandro G. Elsztain,
as Chief Executive Officer of the company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that;



| | (1) | The Report fully complies
    with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
    all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the company.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                    
|------------------------------------
|/s/    ALEJANDRO
        G. ELSZTAIN
|By: Alejandro
    G. Elsztain       
|Chief
    Executive Officer         
|                                    
|December
    13, 2011               

This certification
accompanies the Report pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not, except as to the extent required
by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended.
No. 65405.

#### Sears, Roebuck and Co. *v.*United States,

protest 58/10495 (Galveston).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Schmidt Pritchard & Co. et al.*(47 C.C.P.A. 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 60418.

protest 249906-K (New York).

#### Pino de Luca *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of stone sculptures similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 58592, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 93 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Natural Resources 

in the One Hundred Fifteenth Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 6, 2017 

Mr. BISHOP of Utah (for himself and Mr. GRIJALVA) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on 

Natural Resources in the One Hundred Fifteenth Congress. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES. 

3 For the expenses of the Committee on Natural Re4 sources (hereafter in this resolution referred to as the 

5 ‘‘Committee’’), including the expenses of all staff salaries, 

6 there shall be paid, out of the applicable accounts of the 

7 House of Representatives for committee salaries and ex8 penses, not more than $13,758,344 for the One Hundred 

9 Fifteenth Congress. 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 93 IH 

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS. 

2 Of the amount specified in section 1— 

3 (1) not more than $6,879,172 shall be available 

4 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

5 noon on January 3, 2017, and ending immediately 

6 before noon on January 3, 2018; and 

7 (2) not more than $6,879,172 shall be available 

8 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

9 noon on January 3, 2018, and ending immediately 

10 before noon on January 3, 2019. 

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS. 

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on 

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the 

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner 

15 directed by the Committee on House Administration. 

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS. 

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall 

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by 

19 the Committee on House Administration. 

Æ 


smartinez on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

VICTOR MONZON and

MARIA MONZON

:

:

: CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-CV-4241

Plaintiffs, :

:

v. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION;

BAYER AG;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE;

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM

:

:

:

:

:

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

:

Defendants. :

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of the Court:

Kindly enter the appearances of Hope S. Freiwald, Aline Fairweather, Erin

Brennan and Kirstin J. Miller as attorneys for defendant GlaxoSmithKline PLC.

Respectfully Submitted,

_____________________________ _____________________________

Hope S. Freiwald Aline Fairweather

_____________________________ _____________________________

Erin Brennan Kirstin J. Miller

DECHERT PRICE & RHOADS

4000 Bell Atlantic Tower

1717 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2793

(215) 994-4000

Case 2:02-cv-04241-JCJ Document 6 Filed 09/11/2002 Page 1 of 1
# C_2017095EN.01000402.xml

| 27.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 95/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 95/4

---

Appeal brought on 7 September 2016 by Universal Protein Supplements Corp. against the judgment of the General Court (Fourth Chamber) delivered on 29 June 2016 in Cases T-727/14 and T-728/14: UNIVERSAL PROTEIN SUPPLEMENTS v EUIPO — H YOUNG HOLDINGS (ANIMAL)

(Case C-485/16 P)

(2017/C 095/09)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Universal Protein Supplements Corp. (represented by: S. Malynicz QC)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), H Young Holdings plc

Other parties to the proceedings:

By order of 31 January 2017 the Court of Justice (Eighth Chamber) held that the appeal was inadmissible.

---
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of TenFold
Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert P. Hughes, Chief Financial Officer of
the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                                                                         
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                         
|/s/ Robert P. Hughes                                                                                                     
|Robert P. Hughes Chief Financial Officer and Chief
of Staff (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) November 1, 2006
Document headings vary by document type but may contain
                    the following: the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document
the number of the CFR title and the number of each part
                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly
                      related to
the agency docket number / agency internal file number
the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in
                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory
                      Actions See the
                    Document Drafting Handbook
                    for more details.
 Small Business Administration [Disaster Declaration #20026 and #20027; FLORIDA Disaster Number FL-20000]
 AGENCY: U.S. Small Business Administration.
 ACTION: Correction.
 SUMMARY: This is a correction to an Administrative declaration of a disaster for the State of Florida dated 10/30/2023. *Incident:*
                         Tornado. *Incident Period:*
                         10/12/2023.
 DATES: Issued on 11/02/2023. *Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         12/29/2023. *Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*
                         07/30/2024.
 ADDRESSES: *Visit the MySBA Loan Portal at https://lending.sba.gov*
                         to apply for a disaster assistance loan.
 FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.


SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Correction is hereby given that as a result of the Administrator's disaster declaration, applications for disaster loans may be submitted online using the MySBA Loan Portal 
                    *https://lending.sba.gov*
                     or other locally announced locations. Please contact the SBA disaster assistance customer service center by email at 
                    *disastercustomerservice@sba.gov*
                     or by phone at 1-800-659-2955 for further assistance. The following areas have been determined to be adversely affected by the disaster: *Primary Counties:*
                     Citrus. *Contiguous Counties:* *Florida:*
                     Hernando, Levy, Marion, Sumter The Interest Rates are: Percent*For Physical Damage:*Homeowners with Credit Available Elsewhere
5.000Homeowners without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.500Businesses with Credit Available Elsewhere
8.000Businesses without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations with Credit Available Elsewhere
2.375Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.375*For Economic Injury:*Business and Small Agricultural Cooperatives without Credit Available Elsewhere
4.000Non-Profit Organizations without Credit Available Elsewhere
2.375
 The number assigned to this disaster for physical damage is 20026C and for economic injury is 200270. The State which received an EIDL Declaration is Florida. (Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008) Isabella Guzman, Administrator.


[FR Doc. 2023-24683 Filed 11-7-23; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

In connection with the periodic report of Nara Bancorp, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report), I, Alvin D. Kang, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certify as of the date hereof, solely for purposes of Title 18, Chapter 63, Section 1350 of the United States Code, that:



| | (1) | the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This Certification has not been, and shall not be deemed, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.

Dated: February 18, 2011



/S/    ALVIN D.
KANGChief Executive Officer
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 44 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 1 of 7
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 44 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 2 of 7
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 44 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 3 of 7
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 44 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 4 of 7
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 44 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 5 of 7
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 44 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 6 of 7
Case 2:02-cv-04360-RBS Document 44 Filed 05/01/2007 Page 7 of 7
No. 63550.

protests 198160-K, etc. (New York).

#### Frederik Lunning, Inc., and Airport Clearance Service et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of vases in mineral colors similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 62694, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
## In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

No. 02

- 17

- 00358

- CR

L ENDON L EE A DAMS

, Appellant

V

.

T HE S TATE OF T EXAS §

§

§

§

§ On Appeal from the 396th District

Court

of Tarrant County (1413 691D)

March 7, 2019

Opinion by Justice Bassel

(nfp)

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that there

was no error in the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the judgment of the trial

court is affirmed.

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS

By /s/ Dabney Bassel

Justice Dabney Bassel
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 217 (Monday, November 13, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 77594]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-24967]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; NIAID Investigator Initiated 
Program Project Applications (P01 Clinical Trial Not Allowed).
    Date: January 9, 2024.
    Time: 1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3E71, 
Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Samita S. Andreansky, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3E71, 
Rockville, MD 20852, 240-669-2915, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#6c1f0d0105180d420d02081e090d021f07152c020504420b031a"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="740715191d00155a151a100611151a071f0d341a1d1c5a131b02">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: November 7, 2023.
David W. Freeman,
Supervisory Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee 
Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-24967 Filed 11-9-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
David N. Baker 

### Department of Energy Washington
. DC 20585
April 24, 2012 Counsel, Government Regulati o ns & Regulatory Compliance OF. App liances Appliance Park. AP2

- 225 Louisville , K Y 40225 Dear Mr
. Baker: This letter is in response to your February 17.2012 , petition for waiver and application for interim waiver from the te st procedure applicable to residential clothes washers under T itle 1001' the Code of Federal Regulations 

### (10 CFR), pm 430, The U.s, Department of Ene rgy (DOE) iss ued a final rule revising the clothes wa sher test procedure set forth in 10 CFR pan 430. subpart B, appendix JI in the Fede r al Register on March 7, 2012 (77 FR 13888). DOE also established a new appendix J2 ; manufacturers will 

### be required to certify compliance using appendix J 2 on the compliance date of any amended standards for clothes washers. This tinal rule was effective on April 6 , 2012. The test procedure revi sio ns in appendices 

### J 1 and J 2 address clothes**wash~rs** with basket volumes greater than 3.8 cubic feet (sec T abl e 5.1). Therefore, a waiver is no longer necessary for the basic models s pecified in GE's pet ition for waivcr dated February 17 , 2012 w ith baske t volumes greatcr than 3.8 cubic feet. If you have any questions concerning this matte r, please contact Mr. Bryan Berringer of my staff. at (202) 586

-0371.

John Cymbalsky Supervisor. Appliance Standard s Analysis Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy 

# *
Printed wi th tat Klk on recycled paper
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                         CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-8 for the Company's Citizens First Savings Bank 401 (K) Plan
(Registration No. 333-74218), Citizens First Bancorp, Inc. 2001 Stock-Based
Incentive Plan (Registration No. 333-98199) and Citizens First Bancorp, Inc.
Management Restricted Stock Purchase Plan (Registration No. 333-100516) of our
report dated March 12, 2004 relating to the consolidated financial statements of
Citizens First Bancorp, Inc. which appears in this Form 10-K.

BDO SEIDMAN, LLP

Grand Rapids, Michigan
March 12, 2004
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CRIMINAL ACTION

:

v. :

:

STEVEN ALLEN SCHWARTZ : NO. 04-231

ORDER

AND NOW, this 15th day of May, 2012, for the reasons

set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED

that:

(1) the motion of defendant Steven Schwartz to vacate,

set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc.

#84) is DENIED; and

(2) no certificate of appealability is issued.

BY THE COURT:

 /s/ Harvey Bartle III 

 J.

Case 2:04-cr-00231-HB Document 119 Filed 05/15/12 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-6887

ANTHONY BERNARD BURNSIDE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JON NEWLON,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District

Judge. (6:06-cv-00620-HMH)

Submitted: July 20, 2006 Decided: July 28, 2006

Before WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Bernard Burnside, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Anthony Bernard Burnside appeals the district court’s

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Burnside v.

Newlon, No. 6:06-cv-00620-HMH (D.S.C. Mar. 29, 2006). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2016326EN.01001102.xml

| 5.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/11

---

Appeal brought on 16 June 2016 by the Portuguese Republic against the order of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 19 April 2016 in Case T-550/15 Portugal v Commission

(Case C-337/16 P)

(2016/C 326/21)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Portuguese Republic (represented by: L. Inez Fernandes, M. Figueiredo, P. Estêvão and J. Saraiva de Almeida, acting as Agents)

Appellant:

Other party: European Commission

Other party:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

| — | Set aside the judgment under appeal in so far as, in that judgment, the General Court accepted the plea of inadmissibility raised by the Commission in the present proceedings; |
| --- | --- |

—

Set aside the judgment under appeal in so far as, in that judgment, the General Court accepted the plea of inadmissibility raised by the Commission in the present proceedings;

| — | Declare that the appeal of the contested decision has been validly brought within the period laid down in Article 263 TFEU. |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare that the appeal of the contested decision has been validly brought within the period laid down in Article 263 TFEU.

| — | Order the European Commission to pay all of the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the European Commission to pay all of the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The Portuguese Republic considers that the decision is invalid on the following grounds:

A — First ground — Calculation of the time-limit for bringing proceedings against the decision of 20 July 2015

A — First ground —

First argument

First argument

Infringement of Article 263 TFEU.

Second argument

Second argument

Calculation of the time-limit for bringing proceedings from the date of notification of the final decision on 20 July 2015.

B — Second Ground — Calculation of the time-limit for bringing proceedings from the date of publication of the contested decision in the Official Journal

B — Second Ground —

First argument

First argument

The wording of Article 263(6) TFEU.

Second argument

Second argument

The consistent practice of publishing such decisions and identical prior legal proceedings.

C — Third Ground — The General Court erred in law in so far as it did not favour an interpretation that did not result in lapse of the right to bring proceedings

C — Third Ground —

---
# C_2016326EN.01001402.xml

| 5.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/14

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal de première instance de Liège (Belgium) lodged on 22 June 2016 — Jean Jacob, Dominique Lennertz v Belgian State

(Case C-345/16)

(2016/C 326/25)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal de première instance de Liège

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Jean Jacob, Dominique Lennertz

Applicants:

Defendant: Belgian State

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Is it contrary to Article 39 of the Treaty on European Union for the Belgian tax system, at Article 155 of the CIR/92 and regardless of whether Circular No Ci.RH.331/575.420 of 12 March 2008 is applied, to have the effect that Mr Jacob’s Luxembourg pensions, exempted from tax pursuant to Article 18 of the Convention concluded between Belgium and Luxembourg for the avoidance of double taxation, are taken into account for the purposes of calculating the tax payable in Belgium and used as the basis of assessment for the grant of tax advantages provided for under the CIR 92, and that those advantages, such as the tax-free allowance, long-term savings, costs paid with service vouchers, costs incurred in saving energy in the home, costs incurred in protecting the home against theft or fire, and charitable donations made by the applicant, are reduced or granted to a lesser extent than if both the applicants had income earned in Belgium and if Ms Lennertz, and not Mr Jacob, had received pensions only from Belgium?

---