alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2018042EN.01001502.xml

| 5.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 42/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 42/15

---

Judgment of the General Court of 13 December 2017 — Delfin Wellness v EUIPO — Laher (Infrared and sauna cabins)

(Case T-114/16) (1)

1

((Community design - Invalidity proceedings - Registered community designs representing infrared and sauna cabins - Earlier designs - Ground for invalidity - Lack of novelty - Article 5 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Disclosure of the earlier designs before the date of priority - Article 7(1) and (2) of Regulation No 6/2002 - Right to be heard - Article 64(1) of Regulation No 6/2002))

(2018/C 042/21)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Delfin Wellness GmbH (Leonding, Austria) (represented by: T. Riedler, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: S. Hanne, acting as Agent)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Sabine Laher (Weyer, Austria) (represented by: P. Pfeil, lawyer)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court:

Re:

Re:

Action brought against three decisions of the Third Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 12 January 2016 (Cases R 849/2014–3, R 850/2014–3 and R 851/2014–3), relating to invalidity proceedings between Delfin Wellness and Ms Laher.

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the action; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the action;

| 2. | Orders Delfin Wellness GmbH to pay the costs, including the costs necessarily incurred by Ms Sabine Laher for the purposes of the three sets of proceedings before the Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO). |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Delfin Wellness GmbH to pay the costs, including the costs necessarily incurred by Ms Sabine Laher for the purposes of the three sets of proceedings before the Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO).

---

(1)  OJ C 165, 10.5.2016.

1

---
**EXHIBIT 32.2****SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of GMX Resources Inc. (the “Company”),hereby certifies that the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007(the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.        Date: March 13, 2008 /s/ James A. Merrill   James A. Merrill                Chief Financial Officer
# C_2018161EN.01000801.xml

| 7.5.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 161/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.5.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 161/8

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 8 March 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf — Germany) — DOCERAM GmbH v CeramTec GmbH

(Case C-395/16) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Intellectual and industrial property - Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 - Community design - Article 8(1) - Features of appearance of a product solely dictated by its technical function - Criteria for assessment - Existence of alternative designs - Consideration of the point of view of an ‘objective observer’))

(2018/C 161/08)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: DOCERAM GmbH

Applicant:

Defendant: CeramTec GmbH

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

| (1) | Article 8(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 of 12 December 2001 on Community designs must be interpreted as meaning that in order to determine whether the features of appearance of a product are exclusively dictated by its technical function, it must be established that the technical function is the only factor which determined those features, the existence of alternative designs not being decisive in that regard. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Article 8(1) of Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 of 12 December 2001 on Community designs must be interpreted as meaning that in order to determine whether the features of appearance of a product are exclusively dictated by its technical function, it must be established that the technical function is the only factor which determined those features, the existence of alternative designs not being decisive in that regard.

| (2) | Article 8(1) of Regulation No 6/2002 must be interpreted as meaning that, in order to determine whether the relevant features of appearance of a product are solely dictated by its technical function, within the meaning of that provision, the national court must take account of all the objective circumstances relevant to each individual case. In that regard, there is no need to base those findings on the perception of an ‘objective observer’. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 8(1) of Regulation No 6/2002 must be interpreted as meaning that, in order to determine whether the relevant features of appearance of a product are solely dictated by its technical function, within the meaning of that provision, the national court must take account of all the objective circumstances relevant to each individual case. In that regard, there is no need to base those findings on the perception of an ‘objective observer’.

---

(1)  OJ C 419, 14.11.2016.

1

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

: CIVIL ACTION NOS.

:

HAYES : 02-3937

MCKNIGHT : 02-3954

SKOGLULND : 02-3979

BALLIRO : 02-4111

SADEIK : 02-4129

HAYWARD, et al. : 02-4133

WAINER, et al. : 02-4177

VAN STREEPEN, et al. : 02-4199

BAILEY : 02-4231

ABERCROMBIE, et al. : 02-4235

TRESSLAR, et al. : 02-4291

CONLEY, et al. : 02-4296

GLADHART, et al. : 02-4312

:

VS. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION, et al. :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of July, 2002, the Court having been previously

advised that the above action cannot proceed to trial and disposition because of the following

reason:

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending disposition of a related

action.

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending determination of

arbitration proceedings.

[ ] - Interlocutory appeal filed.

[ X ] - Other: Case is placed into suspense pending receipt of the Case

Transfer Order from the Judicial Panel on Multi District Litigation

transferring case to District of Minnesota..

Case 2:02-cv-04133-CMR Document 2 Filed 07/10/2002 Page 1 of 2
It is

ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this action closed for statistical purposes and

place the matter in the Civil Suspense File, and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction; and that the case be

restored to the trial docket when the action is in a status so that it may proceed to final

disposition; this order shall not prejudice the rights of the parties to this litigation.

BY THE COURT:

________________________________________

Cynthia M. Rufe, Judge

Case 2:02-cv-04133-CMR Document 2 Filed 07/10/2002 Page 2 of 2
# C_2018072EN.01001102.xml

| 26.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 72/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 72/11

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 20 December 2017 — Binca Seafoods GmbH v European Commission

(Case C-268/16 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Regulation (EC) No 834/2007 - Production and labelling of organic products - Regulation (EC) No 889/2008 - Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1358/2014 - Interest in bringing proceedings - Notion of ‘personal benefit’))

(2018/C 072/14)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Binca Seafoods GmbH (represented by: H. Schmidt, Rechtsanwalt)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: A. Lewis, G. von Rintelen and K. Walkerová, Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets aside the order of the General Court of the European Union of 11 March 2016, Binca Seafoods v Commission (T-94/15, not published, EU:T:2016:164); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets aside the order of the General Court of the European Union of 11 March 2016, Binca Seafoods v Commission (T-94/15, not published, EU:T:2016:164);

| 2. | Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Refers the case back to the General Court of the European Union;

| 3. | Reserves the costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Reserves the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 279, 1.8.2016.

1

---
Case 2:02-cv-02746-JP Document 6 Filed 06/03/2002 Page 1 of 1
# C_2017129EN.01001401.xml

| 24.4.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 129/14 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.4.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/14

---

Order of the President of the Court of 18 January 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverwaltungsgericht — Austria) — Kärntner Ausgleichszahlungs-Fonds v Österreichische Finanzmarktaufsichtsbehörde (FMA)

(Case C-309/16) (1)

1

(2017/C 129/21)

Language of the case: German

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 335, 12.9.2016.

1

---
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549



FORM 10-K/A
Amendment No. 1

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001

Commission file number 333-85443-05

ABN AMRO Mortgage Corporation (as depositor under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement,
Dated as of November 1, 2000 providing for, inter alia, the issuance of ABN AMRO Mortgage
Corporation Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates Series 2000-3)
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of  incorporation or organization)

363886007
(I.R.S. Employer  Identification No.)

181 West Madison Street, Chicago, Illinois  60602
(Address of principal executive offices)

60602
(Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code:  (248)  643-2530

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
           Yes [X]       No  [ ]

This Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A amends Item 14 of the original
Form 10-K which was filed on March 26, 2002


      Item 14.	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K.

	(a)	Exhibits

		(99.1)	Annual Independent Accountant's Servicing Report

		(99.2)	Annual Statement of Compliance

	(b) 	Reports on Form 8-K were filed during the last quarter of 2001 in order to provide
statements for the monthly distributions to investors on September 27, 2001,
October 25, 2001, November 27, 2001, and December 26, 2001.

Exhibits 99.1 and 99.2 are not filed herewith since documents were not received at least
three business days prior to the due date of this report.  The documents will be included in the
Form 10-K/A to be filed within 30 days of the receipt of such documents.



				SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

LaSalle Bank National Association, in its
capacity as Agent for the Trustee under the Pooling and
Servicing Agreement on behalf of  ABN AMRO Mortgage
Corporation, Registrant


By:	/s/  	Cynthia Reis
	---------------------------
		Cynthia Reis
		First Vice President

Date:	May 21, 2002
| 1.     | Such      Yearly Report of Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2008 fully      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities      Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                   |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |
| 2.     | The      information contained in such Yearly Report on Form 10-K for the year      ended December 31, 2008 fairly represents in all material respects, the      financial condition and results of operations of Genesis Realty Group,      Inc. |

| Date:      December 18, 2009                                                 |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                                         |
| GENESIS      REALTY GROUP, INC.                                              |
|                                                                         |
| By:                                                                          |  /s/      Jeffrey Glick |
| Jeffrey      GlickChief      Executive Officer, Chief      Financial Officer |
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


     In connection with the annual report of Alnilam Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2006, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
the undersigned principal executive officer and principal financial officer
of the Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1)  the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of
          operations of the Company.

Date:  December 22, 2006

/s/ Eric Bronk
Eric Bronk, President and Treasurer
(Principal executive officer
and principal financial officer)
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 77 Filed 04/25/2005 Page 1 of 14
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 77 Filed 04/25/2005 Page 2 of 14
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 77 Filed 04/25/2005 Page 3 of 14
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 77 Filed 04/25/2005 Page 4 of 14
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 77 Filed 04/25/2005 Page 5 of 14
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 77 Filed 04/25/2005 Page 6 of 14
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 77 Filed 04/25/2005 Page 7 of 14
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 77 Filed 04/25/2005 Page 8 of 14
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 77 Filed 04/25/2005 Page 9 of 14
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 77 Filed 04/25/2005 Page 10 of 14
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 77 Filed 04/25/2005 Page 11 of 14
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 77 Filed 04/25/2005 Page 12 of 14
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 77 Filed 04/25/2005 Page 13 of 14
Case 2:02-cv-04302-MFA Document 77 Filed 04/25/2005 Page 14 of 14
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

COUNSEL CORPORATION, )

Plaintiff )

) CIVIL ACTION 

v. ) No. 04-cv-3852

)

GARY J. WASSERSON, )

Defendant )

GARY J. WASSERSON, )

Plaintiff )

) CIVIL ACTION

v. ) No. 04-cv-3864

)

I-LINK CORP., et al. )

Defendants )

______________________________________________________________________________

FINAL JUDGMENT ORDER

AND NOW, this 24 day of August 2010, upon review and consideration of Plaintiff’s

th

Motion for Entry of Final Judgment and Award of Attorneys’ Fees [docket entry No. 62],

Defendants’ Response to Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Final Judgment and Award of

Attorneys’ Fees [docket entry No. 63], Plaintiff’s Reply [docket entry No. 66], and for reasons

set forth in the attached Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion

is GRANTED in part, DENIED in part. Final Judgment is hereby entered in a sum certain

amount of $404,896.75, in favor of Wasserson, the prevailing party, against Defendants Counsel

Corporation, Counsel Corporation (US), C2 Global Technologies, Inc., and Alan Silber as

follows: 

1. $715,717.22 to Wasserson, with a deduction for the award to Defendants I-Link, et
al., in the amount of $310.820.47, for a net judgment in favor of Wasserson in the amount of

$404,896.75. 

The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case.

It is so ORDERED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Cynthia M. Rufe

__________________________

CYNTHIA M. RUFE, J.
p ‘:‘~~ OFFlCROFTHEAlTORNRYGENERALOFTRXAS 

, 

AURT'IN 

30 ” 

rplus tumdm eolem of ccahot- 

. . 

ber wth, 

r 16tter ot Septearritt ) Nr. Tucker, Peher thereisuqhe produat.%on of flshl?or 

+a by arperKl.itures or poration Mll, to whloh you refer, as pasmiffo appropriations for Ohe Game, Fish 

The Approprfation Bill has tlLviAe& s&e 

0x1: 

Ylsh ROpS##iOB and Protection DiViriOB, 

Corctbl Rivislon, Xrinteasncs, X.l.scell8nooua 6r 1mpr0tcmBttl nirimion, Fish, Eatehery and Sand, Shell 

6nd Gravel Blrisica, &aintemance, miaoellmeoas and Improvepients DitislOn, all Of which sabrPO0 SUJ different itas. 

'Phe rider ottaohed to said approprlrtlon reads ia 

part as follawsr 
31 

usme, Fish (r. Oyster Comdsaion - page B 

‘The for4gOlng up4Offle UOUBb, Or so 

maoh thoroaf u may be used, U’4 hereby 8p-’ 

- proprirtod for the purposee above enweratsd. 

0 4 4. ~11 mmsy to the oredit of these 

speoial funds on band in the Strta Trersq 

010 Septmber I, 1943, together with the current revenuea to be derived and plaoed to 

the oredit aE these cpeoiol funds during the 

nut o~w.lag twe yersa snding Wgast 31, 1945, 

are hereby rppropriatsd ami ry bo uoed fer 

the performmae of the duties u&l funotions 

of Ihe (iwe, Fish 6 water GoQd.ui0n in.prOl wriag, proteeting nod ia8Peasing the supply 

of wild birds, wiia animals, fish 8nd other 

edAble rquatio uduls of tbtm State. 4 4 4. 

lie rddiiionel 44iploye4s, exempt teapory k 

pleyees, uy be paid from my fund herein l pproprirted. Any salary paid 8tempervf employee shall not exoeed the mte at salaries 

h4r4iB appropri8ted for employees wlth~simil8r 

.dUtliU.~ 

It is our opinion that the oondoatlag of s mhellfish hatobery for the production 4f oysters could aene 

within the *preeaxW.mg, proteoting and inoreuing the eupp&y of wild birdm, wild mimalr, flub antI Otber’dlbXe 

8quats.c uhals of this state.* You an, therafera, use 

8x1~ of the surplus Tundo ever and above thome spedffloal1~ 8ppropriated for said purpose, 

loi oannot, hewav+r, employ amy uIditisna1 help 

or epplo7444 exoapt those that rould be teraed and sre 

*teuiporary saployeeo*, und pay s~lpd htco; any of sitid Wm.
| 1.  | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                     |
|----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|     |                                                                                                                                                                |
| 2.       | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |

|                |        |                                                                         |
|---------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                |   |                                                                         |   |
| March      31, 2009 | By:    | /s/ Niv      Krikov                                                     |   |
|                |   | Niv      Krikov                                                              |   |
|                |   | Treasurer,      Chief Financial Officerand      Principal Accounting Officer |   |
|                |   |                                                                         |   |
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K Andover Holdings, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on her knowledge:

(1)

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  May 1, 2012

| |                                      
| | -------------------------------------
| |                                      
| |                                      
| | /s/ Barbara L. Tolley                
| | Barbara L. Tolley                    
| | Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-11-00309-CV

In re Agustin Zurita

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM TRAVIS COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

PER CURIAM

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied and the motion for emergency relief is

dismissed. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton and Rose

Filed: May 23, 2011
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

SHELBY PRICE, :

: CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-CV-4299

Plaintiff, :

:

v. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION;

BAYER AG;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE;

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM

:

:

:

:

:

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

:

Defendants. :

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of the Court:

Kindly enter the appearances of Hope S. Freiwald, Aline Fairweather, Erin

Brennan and Kirstin J. Miller as attorneys for defendant SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a

GlaxoSmithKline.

Respectfully Submitted,

_____________________________ _____________________________

Hope S. Freiwald Aline Fairweather

_____________________________ _____________________________

Erin Brennan Kirstin J. Miller

DECHERT PRICE & RHOADS

4000 Bell Atlantic Tower

1717 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2793

(215) 994-4000

Case 2:02-cv-04299-HH Document 9 Filed 10/04/2002 Page 1 of 1