alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
|Exhibit
  32.2
|--------------



|CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION
      906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF
  2002
|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The undersigned hereby certifies in her capacity as
Chief Financial Officer ofBelairCapital Fund LLC (the Fund), that based on her knowledge:

|(a) | theQuarterlyReport of the Fund on Form10-Qfor thequarterendedMarch 31, 2006(the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
      of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(b) | the information contained in the Report
      fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the
      results of operations of the Fund for such period.                          
|   



|Date:May 10,
    2006
|---------------------



| | /s/Michelle A.
      GreenMichelle A. GreenChief Financial Officer
| | ------------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required
by Section 906 has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund
and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
No. 52517.

protests 134893-K, etc. (St. Louis).

#### George A. Breon & Company *v.*United States,

*198Opinion by

Cole, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise in question is the same in all material respects as the estrogenic hormone passed upon in *Roche-Organon*v. *United, States*(35 C. C. P. A. 99, C. A. D. 378). The claim at 10 percent under paragraph 34 was therefore sustained.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 98-7714

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DEON MAURICE MOSELY, a/k/a D, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Albert V. Bryan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CR-91-429-A, CA-98-517-AM) Submitted: January 7, 1999 Decided: January 21, 1999 Before WIDENER, MURNAGHAN, and ERVIN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Deon Maurice Mosely, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Chestnut, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).2 PER CURIAM: Deon Maurice Mosely seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1998) and his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Mosely , Nos. CR-91-429-A; CA-98-517-AM (E.D. Va. Sept. 10 & Oct. 9, 1998). We dispense with oral argument becausethe facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
**Exhibit 13.1**

 

**Certification**

 

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

**(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code)**

 

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the undersigned officerof Allianz Aktiengesellschaft, a German company (the “Company”), hereby certifies, to such officer’s knowledge, that: 

 

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004 (the “Report”) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. 

 

Date: April 19, 2005
Case 2:04-cv-03918-RBS Document 30 Filed 06/19/06 Page 1 of 15
Case 2:04-cv-03918-RBS Document 30 Filed 06/19/06 Page 2 of 15
Case 2:04-cv-03918-RBS Document 30 Filed 06/19/06 Page 3 of 15
Case 2:04-cv-03918-RBS Document 30 Filed 06/19/06 Page 4 of 15
Case 2:04-cv-03918-RBS Document 30 Filed 06/19/06 Page 5 of 15
Case 2:04-cv-03918-RBS Document 30 Filed 06/19/06 Page 6 of 15
Case 2:04-cv-03918-RBS Document 30 Filed 06/19/06 Page 7 of 15
Case 2:04-cv-03918-RBS Document 30 Filed 06/19/06 Page 8 of 15
Case 2:04-cv-03918-RBS Document 30 Filed 06/19/06 Page 9 of 15
Case 2:04-cv-03918-RBS Document 30 Filed 06/19/06 Page 10 of 15
Case 2:04-cv-03918-RBS Document 30 Filed 06/19/06 Page 11 of 15
Case 2:04-cv-03918-RBS Document 30 Filed 06/19/06 Page 12 of 15
Case 2:04-cv-03918-RBS Document 30 Filed 06/19/06 Page 13 of 15
Case 2:04-cv-03918-RBS Document 30 Filed 06/19/06 Page 14 of 15
Case 2:04-cv-03918-RBS Document 30 Filed 06/19/06 Page 15 of 15
Case 2:04-cv-03485-CDJ   Document 130-1   Filed 03/25/08   Page 1 of 39

Case 2:04-cv-03485-CDJ   Document 130-1   Filed 03/25/08   Page 2 of 39

Case 2:04-cv-03485-CDJ   Document 130-1   Filed 03/25/08   Page 3 of 39

Case 2:04-cv-03485-CDJ   Document 130-1   Filed 03/25/08   Page 4 of 39

Case 2:04-cv-03485-CDJ   Document 130-1   Filed 03/25/08   Page 5 of 39

Case 2:04-cv-03485-CDJ   Document 130-1   Filed 03/25/08   Page 6 of 39

Case 2:04-cv-03485-CDJ   Document 130-1   Filed 03/25/08   Page 7 of 39

Case 2:04-cv-03485-CDJ   Document 130-1   Filed 03/25/08   Page 8 of 39

Case 2:04-cv-03485-CDJ   Document 130-1   Filed 03/25/08   Page 9 of 39

Case 2:04-cv-03485-CDJ   Document 130-1   Filed 03/25/08   Page 10 of 39

Case 2:04-cv-03485-CDJ   Document 130-1   Filed 03/25/08   Page 11 of 39

Case 2:04-cv-03485-CDJ   Document 130-1   Filed 03/25/08   Page 12 of 39

Case 2:04-cv-03485-CDJ   Document 130-1   Filed 03/25/08   Page 13 of 39

Case 2:04-cv-03485-CDJ   Document 130-1   Filed 03/25/08   Page 14 of 39

Case 2:04-cv-03485-CDJ   Document 130-1   Filed 03/25/08   Page 15 of 39

Case 2:04-cv-03485-CDJ   Document 130-1   Filed 03/25/08   Page 16 of 39

Case 2:04-cv-03485-CDJ   Document 130-1   Filed 03/25/08   Page 17 of 39

Case 2:04-cv-03485-CDJ   Document 130-1   Filed 03/25/08   Page 18 of 39

Case 2:04-cv-03485-CDJ   Document 130-1   Filed 03/25/08   Page 19 of 39

Case 2:04-cv-03485-CDJ   Document 130-1   Filed 03/25/08   Page 20 of 39

Case 2:04-cv-03485-CDJ   Document 130-1   Filed 03/25/08   Page 21 of 39

Case 2:04-cv-03485-CDJ   Document 130-1   Filed 03/25/08   Page 22 of 39

Case 2:04-cv-03485-CDJ   Document 130-1   Filed 03/25/08   Page 23 of 39

Case 2:04-cv-03485-CDJ   Document 130-1   Filed 03/25/08   Page 24 of 39

Case 2:04-cv-03485-CDJ   Document 130-1   Filed 03/25/08   Page 25 of 39

Case 2:04-cv-03485-CDJ   Document 130-1   Filed 03/25/08   Page 26 of 39

Case 2:04-cv-03485-CDJ   Document 130-1   Filed 03/25/08   Page 27 of 39

Case 2:04-cv-03485-CDJ   Document 130-1   Filed 03/25/08   Page 28 of 39

Case 2:04-cv-03485-CDJ   Document 130-1   Filed 03/25/08   Page 29 of 39

Case 2:04-cv-03485-CDJ   Document 130-1   Filed 03/25/08   Page 30 of 39

Case 2:04-cv-03485-CDJ   Document 130-1   Filed 03/25/08   Page 31 of 39

Case 2:04-cv-03485-CDJ   Document 130-1   Filed 03/25/08   Page 32 of 39

Case 2:04-cv-03485-CDJ   Document 130-1   Filed 03/25/08   Page 33 of 39

Case 2:04-cv-03485-CDJ   Document 130-1   Filed 03/25/08   Page 34 of 39

Case 2:04-cv-03485-CDJ   Document 130-1   Filed 03/25/08   Page 35 of 39

Case 2:04-cv-03485-CDJ   Document 130-1   Filed 03/25/08   Page 36 of 39

Case 2:04-cv-03485-CDJ   Document 130-1   Filed 03/25/08   Page 37 of 39

Case 2:04-cv-03485-CDJ   Document 130-1   Filed 03/25/08   Page 38 of 39

Case 2:04-cv-03485-CDJ   Document 130-1   Filed 03/25/08   Page 39 of 39
No. 51535.

#### Protests 71719-K, etc., of C. R. Bard, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise consist of catheters and similar articles composed in chief value of synthetic gum the same in all material respects as those passed upon in *Bard*v. *United States*(T. D. 49189) and *Bard*v. *United States*(2 Cust. Ct. 244, C. D. 134). In accordance therewith the claim at 20 percent under paragraph 1558 was sustained.
EXHIBIT 32.2

                             CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the Quarterly Report of First Deltavision, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), each of the undersigned,
in the capacities and on the dates indicated below, hereby certifies pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

      1.    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and result of operations
            of the Company at the dates and for the period indicated.

      This Certificate has not been, and shall not be deemed, "filed" with the
Securities and Exchange Commission.


         Dated:  May 14, 2004                By:  /s/ James Ligon
                                                  ------------------------------
                                                  James Ligon
                                                  Chief Financial Officer
any	and	all	information	related	to	a	debt	owed	by	me	to	the	United	States	Government,	to	a	State,	or	any	debt	enforced	by	a	State,

including	child	support	obligations,	and/or	any	payments	made	or	due	to	me	by	a	Federal	or	State	agency,	and/or	any	tax	return	

information disclosed to Fiscal Service by the Internal Revenue Service in order to collect tax debt through the levy process under 26 

U.S.C. § 6331(h), and to conduct tax refund offset under 26 U.S.C. §§ 6402. Tax return information is defined in 26 U.S.C. §

6103(b). Information includes, but is not limited to, correspondence and other information related to my debt(s) or payment(s), 

including my tax refund payment(s).

3. Fiscal Service,	its	employees,	agents,	and	contractors,	are	not	required	to	inform	me	of	disclosures	made	under	this	authorization.

4. This	authorization	will	be	valid	for	6	months	from	the	date	of	signing,	unless	sooner	revoked	by	me	in	writing	and	the revocation is

received and processed by Fiscal Service at this address: Supervisor, TOP Call Center, P.O. Box 1686, Birmingham, Alabama

35201-1686.

5. A photocopy or facsimile copy of this signed authorization has the same force and effect as an original.

The person named in paragraph 1 must sign below.		If	signed	by	a	corporate	officer,	partner,	guardian,	executor,	receiver,		

administrator,	trustee,	or	party	other	than	the	taxpayer,	I	certify	that	I	have	the	authority	to	execute	this	form.		A separate 

Fiscal Service Form 13 must be provided for each debtor.

Signature of Person Authorizing Disclosure Date 

Print Name of Person Authorizing Disclosure Print Title of Person Authorizing Disclosure

FS 13 DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

BUREAU OF THE FISCAL SERVICE

FORM

2-16

Department	of	the	Treasury

Bureau of the Fiscal Service

Authorization for Release of Inform

Fax completed form to:	(855) 292-9700 

1. TO: U.S.	Department	of	the	Treasury,	Bureau of the Fiscal Service

FROM: 

Name (include alias and maiden names): Mailing Address (include street address, p.o. box, suite no., city, state, zip code):

Social Security Number or Employer Identification Number:	 Telephone No.	 Fax No.

2. I	authorize	the	Fiscal Service,	its	employees,	agents,	and	contractors,	to	disclose	to	the	following

person: REPRESENTATIVE:

Name of Individual:	 Mailing Address (include street address, p.o. box, suite no., city, state, zip code):

Company Name (optional):	 Telephone No.	 Fax No.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.1

 STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002,

     The undersigned, Martin A. Thomson, is the Chief Executive Officer of First
Federal of Northern Michigan Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company").

     This statement is being furnished in connection with the filing by the
Company of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
December 31, 2005 (the "Report").

     By execution of this statement, I certify that to the best of my knowledge:

          A)   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m(a)
               or 78o(d)) and

          B)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and results of
               operations of the Company as of the dates and for the periods
               covered by the Report.

     This statement is authorized to be attached as an exhibit to the Report so
that this statement will accompany the Report at such time as the Report is
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350. It is not intended that this
statement be deemed to be filed for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.


March 28, 2006                          /s/ Martin A. Thomson
Dated                                   ----------------------------------------
                                        Martin A. Thomson
EXHIBIT 13.1



Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the Annual Report for Fiscal 2008 Ended August 31, 2008 of Golden Goliath Resources Ltd., a company organized under the British Columbia Corporations Act(the Company) on Form 20-F as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, J. Paul Sorbara, President and Director of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or

15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all

material respects, the financial condition and result of operations

of the Company.



/s/ J. Paul Sorbara

J. Paul Sorbara, President/Director





Date: February 27, 2009





#
Exhibit 32.1
 
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of ProtoKinetix, Inc., a Nevada corporation, (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Ross L. Senior, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify the following pursuant to Section 18, U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002:
 
 1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 2.
The information contained in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 /s/ Ross L. Senior
 Ross L. Senior
 Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
No. 49917.

#### Protest 99367-K of Sprouse-Reitz Co., Inc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record showed that certain items consist of cotton tomato pincushions similar to those involved in Abstracts 48406 and 49442. In accordance therewith the claim at 40 percent under paragraph 923 was sustained as to these items.
# C_2017086EN.01000801.xml

| 20.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 86/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 86/8

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Amtsgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 9 December 2016 — Florian Hanig v Air France SA

(Case C-637/16)

(2017/C 086/10)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Amtsgericht Düsseldorf

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Florian Hanig

Applicant:

Defendant: Air France SA

Defendant:

Question referred

Question referred

Must heading (b) of the first sentence of Article 7(1) of Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 February 2004 establishing common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights, and repealing Regulation (EEC) No 295/91, (1) be interpreted as meaning that the term ‘intra-Community’ also extends to those territories that are so-called ‘overseas countries and territories’ under Annex II to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, for which only the special arrangements for association set out in Part Four of the TFEU apply?

1

---

(1)  OJ 2004 L 46, p. 1.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.1
                                                                    ------------






               SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, the undersigned officer of GMX
Resources Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that the Company's Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005 (the "Report") fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.



Date:    March 30, 2006                                /s/ Ken L. Kenworthy, Jr.
                                                       -------------------------
                                                       Ken L. Kenworthy, Jr.
                                                       Chief Executive Officer
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NILSON EDUARDO GONZALEZ

VASQUEZ,

Petitioner,

v.
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent. No. 18

- 70870

Agency No. A205

- 524

- 782

MEMORANDUM *

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted February 14 , 2023 * *

Before: FERNANDEZ, FRIEDLAND, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

Nilson Eduardo Gonzalez

- Vasquez, a native and citizen of El Salvador,
petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order
dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his

application s for asylum, withholdin g of removal, and protection under the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

FEB 22 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPE ALS2 18

- 70870

Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Our jurisdiction is governed by 8 U.S.C.

§ 1252. We deny in part and dismiss in part the petition for review.

In h is opening brief, Gonzalez

- Vasquez does not challenge, and therefore

forfeits , the BIA’s adverse credibility determination. See Lopez

- Vasquez v.

Holder , 706 F.3d 1072, 1079

- 80 (9th Cir. 2013). Gonzalez

- Vasquez also forfeits

any challenge to the denial of CAT protection

. Thus, we deny th e petition for

review as to h is asylum, withholding of removal, and CAT claims

.
We do not consider Gonzalez

- Vasquez’s claim s based on particular social

groups of returnees or witnesses to crimes because the BIA did not decide the se

issue s , see Santiago

- Rodriguez v. Holder , 657 F.3d 820, 829 (9th Cir. 2011)

(review limited to the grounds relied on by the BIA), and Gonzalez

- Vasquez does

not contend the BIA erred in finding that these claims w ere no t properly before it,

see Lopez

- Vasquez , 706 F.3d at 1079

- 80.
We lack jurisdiction to consider Gonzalez

- Vasquez ’s contention that the IJ

violated his due process rights because he did not raise it before the BIA. See
Barron v. Ashcroft , 358 F.3d 674, 677

- 78 (9th Cir. 2004) (court lacks jurisdiction

to review claims not presented to the agency).

PETITON FOR REVIEW DENIED in part; DISMISSED in part.
# C_2018142EN.01000401.xml

| 23.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 142/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 142/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 1 March 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Bucureşti — Romania) — Colegiul Medicilor Veterinari din România (CMVRO) v Autoritatea Naţională Sanitară Veterinară şi pentru Siguranţa Alimentelor

(Case C-297/16) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 2006/123/EC - Services in the internal market - National legislation limiting the right to retail, use and administer veterinary medicinal, anti-parasitic and organic products to veterinary practitioners - Freedom of establishment - Requirement that the share capital of establishments retailing veterinary medicinal products be held only by veterinary practitioners - Protection of public health - Proportionality))

(2018/C 142/04)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Referring court

Curtea de Apel Bucureşti

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Colegiul Medicilor Veterinari din România (CMVRO)

Applicant:

Defendant: Autoritatea Naţională Sanitară Veterinară şi pentru Siguranţa Alimentelor

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

| (1) | Article 15 of Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on services in the internal market is to be interpreted as not precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, under which veterinary practitioners have an exclusive right to retail and use organic products, special purpose anti-parasitic products and veterinary medicinal products. |
| --- | --- |

(1)

Article 15 of Directive 2006/123/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 December 2006 on services in the internal market is to be interpreted as not precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, under which veterinary practitioners have an exclusive right to retail and use organic products, special purpose anti-parasitic products and veterinary medicinal products.

| (2) | Article 15 of Directive 2006/123 is to be interpreted as precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, under which shares in establishments retailing veterinary medicinal products must be owned exclusively by one or more veterinary practitioners. |
| --- | --- |

(2)

Article 15 of Directive 2006/123 is to be interpreted as precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, under which shares in establishments retailing veterinary medicinal products must be owned exclusively by one or more veterinary practitioners.

---

(1)  OJ C 314, 29.8.2016.

1

---