alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                                                5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the
Duke Capital Corporation Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarter ended June 30, 1999 and is qualified in its entirety by
reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                                   0001051116
<NAME>                                  DUKE CAPITAL CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                            1,000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                        6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                             227,000
<SECURITIES>                                             0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1,889,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                             0
<INVENTORY>                                        197,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 4,301,000
<PP&E>                                           9,969,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,917,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  16,562,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            5,148,000
<BONDS>                                          2,618,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                    0
<PREFERRED>                                              0
<COMMON>                                                 0
<OTHER-SE>                                       5,008,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    16,562,000
<SALES>                                          5,508,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 6,735,000
<CGS>                                            5,239,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    6,031,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   240,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                         0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 115,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    344,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                       111,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                233,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    660,000
<CHANGES>                                                0
<NET-INCOME>                                       893,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                            0 <F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                            0 <F1>

<FN>
<F1>Not meaningful since Duke Capital Corporation is a
wholly-owned subsidiary.
</FN>

</TABLE>
Exhibit 5

                              MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT


Management  Agreement  by and between DCP  Limited (a Nevada  Limited  Liability
Corp.)  (hereinafter  sometimes  referred to as "DCP") and Make Your Move,  Inc.
(hereinafter  sometimes  referred  to as "MYM") and Henry  Rolling  (hereinafter
sometimes referred to as "Rolling")

                                    Recitals

Whereas DCP is a manufacturer of various types of board games.

Whereas MYM is a seller of a number of products and wishes to become a seller of
board games.

Whereas  Rolling is the principal owner and manager of DCP and is experienced in
selling games and will continue the affairs of DCP.

Whereas Rolling is employed as President and Chief Executive Officer of MYM.

                                   Agreement

Now  therefore  MYM agrees that  Rolling  will  continue to manage DCP. DCP will
supply games  exclusively  to MYM. MYM will  purchase  games from DCP and resell
them to the general public.

MYM  agrees to the  members  of DCP  10,000  shares of MYM stock for the  future
opportunity to integrate the games and products of DCP into the technology owned
by MYM.

DCP agrees that when it is  profitable  and has adequate  cash flow DCP will pay
reasonable value for the services provided by MYM.

All  parties  agree  that  DCP is an  affiliated  company  and  that  MYM has no
ownership interest in DCP.

IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the parties  have  executed  this  Agreement by their duly
authorized officers as of the 30th day of June, 2001.

DCP Limited

By /s/Henry Rolling
------------------------
Henry Rolling


Make Your Move, Inc.                     Henry Rolling

By /s/ Henry Rolling                     By /s/ Henry Rolling
------------------------                 ------------------------
Henry Rolling                            Henry Rolling

                                       1
<PAGE>
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board
of Directors

Carolina Bank Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiary

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-60750, 333-105765, 333-146396 and 333-165152) of Carolina Bank Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiary of our report
dated March 3, 2010, related to the audits of the consolidated financial statements of Carolina Bank Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiary as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2009,
which report is included in the December 31, 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K of Carolina Bank Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiary.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P.
|                                     
|Raleigh, North Carolina              
|March 24, 2010
# C_2016016EN.01004802.xml

| 18.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 16/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 16/48

---

Action brought on 13 November 2015 — Tuum v OHIM — Thun (TUUM)

(Case T-635/15)

(2016/C 016/58)

Language in which the application was lodged: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Tuum Srl (San Giustino, Italy) (represented by: B. Saguatti, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Thun SpA (Bolzano, Italy)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word element ‘TUUM’ — Application for registration No 11 939 774

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before OHIM

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 September 2015 in Case R 2624/2014-1

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | reject definitively and in its entirety the opposition to the registration of the mark applied for in respect of the claimed goods in Class 14; |
| --- | --- |

—

reject definitively and in its entirety the opposition to the registration of the mark applied for in respect of the claimed goods in Class 14;

| — | instruct OHIM to register the mark applied for; |
| --- | --- |

—

instruct OHIM to register the mark applied for;

| — | order OHIM and the intervener to pay the costs, including those incurred in the proceedings before the Opposition Division and the Board of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM and the intervener to pay the costs, including those incurred in the proceedings before the Opposition Division and the Board of Appeal.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement and misapplication of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement and misapplication of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
# C o u rt o f

A p p ea ls

o f t h e S t a te o f

G eo rg ia

ATLANTA,_

_ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ __ _

Th e Co u rt

o f Ap p ea l s h er eb y p a s s es t h e f

o ll owi n g o r der :

A1 9 A2 30 3 . ROHAN DAVI S v . J OHN GREEN et a l

.

J o h n Green an d Xi n ro n g Green (co l l ect iv el y , t h e “ Pl ai n t iffs ”) o ri g in al l y fi l ed

t h i s act io n i n m ag i s t rat e co u rt

, s eek i n g u n p ai d ren t an d p o s s e s s i on o f t h e prem i s es

. Th e act io n w as su b seq u en t l y t ran sferred t o s t at e co u rt aft er Ro h an Dav i s (t h e

“ D e f e n d an t ”) fi l ed a co u n t ercl ai m fo r co n s t ru ct i v e ev i ct i on s eek in g d am ag es in

ex ces s o f t h e ju ri s d i ct i o n al l i m i t o f m ag i s t rat e co u rt

. O n M arch 22

, 2 01 9

, t h e s t at e

co u rt gran t ed t h e Pl ai n t i ffs ’ m o t i o n fo r s u m m ary ju d g m en t o n t h ei r cl ai m s , as wel l as

ag ai n s t t h e Defen d an t ’ s co u n t ercl ai m

. Th e Defen d an t fi l ed t h e i n s t an t ap p eal o n Ap ri l

1 9 , 2 0 1 9 . W e, h o w ev er, l ack ju ri s d i ct i o n

. Gen eral ly

, a n o t ice o f ap p eal m u s t b e fi led wi t h i n 3 0 d ay s o f en t ry o f t h e o rd er

s o u g ht t o b e ap p eal ed

. See OCGA § 5 -6 -3 8 (a). Th e u n d erl y i n g s u b ject m at t er o f an

ap p eal

, h o wev er, co n t ro ls o v er t h e rel i ef s o u g h t i n d et erm i n i n g t h e p ro p er ap p el l at e

p ro ced ure. See R eb i ch v. Mi l es , 2 6 4 Ga. 4 6 7

, 4 67 -4 6 8 (4 4 8 SE2 d 1 9 2) (1 9 9 4 ). Th e

u n d erl y i n g s u b

ject m at t er here i s a d i s p o ss es s o ry ju d g m en t

. Un d er OCGA § 4 4 -7 -5 6,

ap p eal s in d i s p o s s e s s o r y act i o n s m u s t b e fi l ed wi t h i n s ev en d ay s o f t h e d at e t h e ju d g m en t was en t ered

. See Ra y M. W r i g h t

, In c. v. Jo n es , 2 3 9 Ga. Ap p

. 5 2 1

, 5 2 2 -5 2 3
(5 2 1 SE2 d 4 5 6 ) (1 9 9 9 ). Th e p ro p er an d t i m e l y f i l i n g o f a n o t i ce o f ap p eal i s an
ab s o lu t e req u irem en t t o co n fer ju ri s d i ct i o n o n t h i s Co urt

. Id

. at 5 2 3

. H e r e , t h e
Defen d an t ’ s n o t ice o f ap p eal is u n t i m el y , as i t was f i l e d 2 8 d ay s aft er en t ry o f t h e ju d g m en t t o b e ap p eal ed

. July 16, 2019Acco rd i ng l y , t h e Defen d an t ’ s ap peal i s h ereb y DISM ISSED fo r l ack o f

ju ri s d i ct i o n

.

C o u r t o f A p p e a l s o f t h e S t a t e o

f G e o r g ia

C le r k ’ s O f f i c e
, A t la n t a
,

_

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I c e r ti fy t h a t t h e a b o v e i s a t r u e e x t r a c t f r o m

t h e m i n u t e s o

f t h e C o u r t o

f A p p e a l s o f G e o r g i a

. W i tn e s s m y s i g n a t u r e a n d th e s e a l o

f s a i d c o u r t

h e r e t o a f f i x e d t h e d a y a n d y e a r l a s t a b o v e w r i t t e n

.

, C l e r k

. 07/16/2019
LOGO





CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors

Carolina Bank Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiary

We consent to the incorporation
by reference in the Registration Statement on Form S-8 (Nos. 333-60750, 333-105765, and 333-146396) of Carolina Bank Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiary of our report dated March 17, 2008, related to the audits of the consolidated financial
statements of Carolina Bank Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiary as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2007, which report is included in the December 31, 2007 Annual Report on Form
10-K of Carolina Bank Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiary.

/s/ Cherry, Bekaert & Holland, L.L.P.

Charlotte, North Carolina

March 26, 2008
Exhibit 32.2
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In  connection  with  the quarterly report of Rosedale Decorative Products,
Ltd.  (the  "Company")  on  Form  10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2005, as
filed  with  the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the
"Report"),  I,  Norman Maxwell, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (3)  The  Report  fully  complies  with  the  requirements of section 13(a)
          or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (4)  The  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
          the Company.



Date:  January 25, 2006                                  By: /s/ NORMAN MAXWELL
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         Norman Maxwell
                                                         Chief Financial Officer
No. 55818.

protest 158862-K (New York).

#### O. Bulowa Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

The protest was dismissed.
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

**CEO CERTIFICATION**

I, A.J. Braswell, certify that:

          1.          I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Foundation Capital Resources, Inc.;

          2.          Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

          3.          Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

          4.          The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:

                    a.          Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

                    b.          Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on this evaluation;

                    c.          Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and 

          5.          The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

                    a.          All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

                    b.          Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal controls over financial reporting.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               APR-03-1999
<CASH>                                             918
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     29,587
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                31,347
<PP&E>                                           6,882
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,678
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  36,181
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           17,365
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             7
<OTHER-SE>                                      17,565
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    36,181
<SALES>                                         14,253
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,253
<CGS>                                            9,596
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,596
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,618
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 134
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    905
<INCOME-TAX>                                       362
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                543
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       543
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .08
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .08
        

</TABLE>
EXHIBIT 23.1
                                                                    ------------




                       Consent of Independent Accountants

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on
Form S-3 (Nos. 333-127254, 333-117256, 333-115571) and Form S-8 (No. 333-106311)
of our report dated February 16, 2006, appearing in this Form 10-KSB, of GMX
Resources Inc.

We also consent to the reference to us under the heading "Experts" in such
Prospectus.



                                       Smith, Carney & Co., p.c.





Oklahoma City, OK
March 31, 2006
# In the United States Court of Federal Claims

OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
GAIL ROSS and CATHERINE * MCDOWELL, parents of * No. 14

- 90 V M.R., a minor, * Special Master Christian J. Moran
* Petitioner, *
*

v. * Filed: September 14, 2015
* SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Stipulation; influenza (“flu”) vaccine ; AND HUMAN SERVICES, * narcolepsy.
* Respondent. *
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Ronald Craig Homer

, Conway, Homer & Chin-Caplan, P.C.

, Boston, MA, for Petitioners; Heather Pearlman, U.S. Dep ’ t of Justice, Washington, DC, for Respondent.

UNPUBLISHED DECISION 1

On September 11

, 2015, the parties filed a joint stipulation concerning the petition for compensation filed by Gail R oss and Catherine McDowell on behalf of M.R. on January 30, 2014. In the petition, petitioners alleged that the influenza vaccine, which is contained in the Va ccine Injury Table (the “Table”), 42 C .F.R. §100.3(a), and which she received on November 18, 2011, caused M.R. to suffer narcolepsy. Petitioner further alleges that she suffered the residual effects of this injury for more than six months. Petitioners represent that there has been no prior
award or settlement of a civil action for damages on M.R.’s behalf as a result of
M.R.’s condition.

1 The E-Government Act of 2002, Pub. L. No. 107-347, 116 Stat. 2899, 2913 (Dec. 17, 2002), requires that the Court post this decision on its website. Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 18(b), the parties have 14 days to file a motion proposing redaction of medical information or other information described in 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-12(d)(4). Any redactions ordered by the special master will appear in the document posted on the website.2

Respondent denies that the influenza vaccine caused petitioner to suffer narcolepsy or any other injury.

Nevertheless, the parties agree to the joint stipulation, attached hereto as Appendix A. The undersigned finds said stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

Damages awarded in that stipulation include:

A lump sum payment of $213 ,0 45

. 24 in the form of a check payable to petitioners
, Gail Ross and Catherine McDowell, as guardians/conservators of M.R. ’s estate. This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a).

A lump sum payment of $16,954.76 payable to petitioners Gail Ross and Catherine McDowell, which represents compensation for past unreimbursable expenses.

In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC, Appendix B, the clerk is directed to enter judgment in cas e 14- 90 V according to this decision and the attached stipulation. 2

Any questions may be directed to my law clerk

, Shannon Proctor, at (202)
357-6 360

.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Christian J. Moran
Christian J. Moran Special Master

2 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), the parties can expedite entry of judgment by each party filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review by a United States Court of Federal Claims judge.
TT

E-MAIL: cnb@navix-.net
3000 TITLE: Chief Financial Officer
4000 ORG: The Cattle National Bank
5000 ORG TYPE: Financial Institution & Trade Association
6000 PHONE: (402) 643-3636
7000 FAX: (402) 643-3099
8000 COMMENTS: To Whom It May Concern:

Date: 9/28/99

\
1000 NAME: Ryne D. Seaman )
2000

This e-mail is in regards to the Treasury's notice of proposed rule changes
relating to the computation of interest on Treasury Tax and Loan deposits
Our financial institution has been a note option holder for a number of
years and recently (approximately 1 year ago) made arrangements for the
special direct investment program. The decision to enroll in the direct
investment program was purely rate-driven, as the borrowing cost for the
direct investment program was less than what alternative sources of funding
were. Looking at a graphical representation over the last five years of
the repurchase agreement rate versus Fed Funds minus 25 b.p., it appears
that the repurchase agreement rate would have been higher on most
occasions. With this in mind, our financial institution is opposed to any
adjustment in the formula of the rate that would increase our cost.
Furthermore, should the new rate computation methodology be approved we
would potentially look to cancel our direct investment program line due to
cost reasons. As an aside, our bank would be interested in receiving TT&L
advances for a guaranteed term, because it would allow us to better manage
our balance sheet by knowing when and how long we would have the advances
around; however, please understand that our decision to participate in the
note option program is primarily rate-driven.

Respect fully

Ryne D. Seaman
Chief Financial Officer
No. 55155.

#### Kossmann & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 164787-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of reptile skins the same in all material respects as those passed upon in *Fleming-Joffe, Ltd.*v. *United States*(25 Cust. Ct. 56, C. D. 1263), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1765 was sustained.