alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the EnergySouth, Inc. (the Company) Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
period ending December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I, Charles P. Huffman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge: 1.
  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and 2.   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date:  February 2, 2005
    By:
    /s/ Charles P. HuffmanCharles P. HuffmanSenior Vice President and
     Chief Financial Officer
 39
Before the First Division,

November 24, 1958

No. 62460.

#### Chekiang Co. and Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 291973-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of iron pictures the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Marshall Field & Co.*v. *United States*(45 C. C. P. A. 72, C. A. D. 676), the claim at *22}í*percent under the provision in paragraph 397, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 51802), for articles or wares in chief value of base metal, not specially provided for, was sustained. The merchandise under protest 326777-K, which was entered on or after June 30, 1956, was held dutiable at 21 percent under said paragraph, as modified by the Sixth Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 54108).
#### Martin Eaton *vs.*Estella T. Marcelle. Estella T. Marcelle *vs.*Martin Eaton.

Sagadahoc.

Opinion, November 24, 1942.

*Edward W. Bridgham,*

*Harold J.*Rubin, for Martin Eaton.

*257
      *JohnP. Carey,*for Estella T. Marcelle.

Sitting: Sturgis, C. J.,Thaxter, Hudson, Manser, Murchie, JJ.

Per Curiam.

These are two cross actions of negligence growing out of an automobile collision on August 16, 1941, at the intersection of High and Oak Streets in the city of Bath. The jury found for Mr. Eaton in both actions. Miss Marcelle presents motions based on the usual grounds for a new trial in each action. No exceptions were taken and so it must be assumed that proper instructions as to the applicable law were given to the jury. *Frye*v. *Kenney,*136 Me., 112, 115, 3 A. (2d), 433.

The parties presented to the jury conflicting facts and theories as to the cause of the collision. Mr. Eaton contended that as he was approaching the intersection with due care, when some six feet therefrom, he saw Miss Marcelle’s automobile coming northerly on High Street “two or three car lengths back”; that with knowledge of the stop sign on High Street he assumed that she would stop, and so he, having reached the intersection first, proceeded into it; but that she, without stopping, continued on and collided with his car when he was about two-thirds across. On the other hand, Miss Marcelle, without denial of not stopping but claiming that she slowed down and changed gears, contended that Mr. Eaton, driving at a high rate of speed, came into the intersection after she had entered it and negligently collided with her car.

The jury heard the evidence and determined the facts. It must have adopted as true Mr. Eaton’s version. Where there is sufficient evidence upon which reasonable men may differ in their conclusions, the Court has no right to substitute its own judgment for that of the jury. *Frye*v. *Kenney,*supra, on page 115. To obtain a new trial the movant has the burden of proving that the jury’s verdict is manifestly wrong. *Marr*v. *Hicks,*136 Me., 33, 34, 1 A. (2d), 271; *Dube*v. *Sherman,*135 Me.,*258144, 146, 190 A., 809. Miss Marcelle has not sustained this burden.

“. . . when two arguable theories are presented, both sustained by evidence, and one is reflected in a jury verdict, this Court is without authority to act. It is only when a verdict is plainly without support that a new trial on general motion may be ordered.” *Mizula*v. *Sawyer et al.,*130 Me., 428, 430, 157 A., 239; *Young*v. *Potter,*133 Me., 104, 108, 174 A., 387. These verdicts plainly had evidential support.

*Motions overruled.*
No. 58861.

protests 171111-K, etc. (New York).

#### Freedman & Slater, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of waste sheepskin scrap similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Fairfield Wool Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 199, C. D. 1653), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
# C_2018408EN.01000901.xml

| 12.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 408/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 408/9

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 September 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) — United Kingdom — Rafal Prefeta v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions

(Case C-618/16) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Freedom of movement for persons - Article 45 TFEU - 2003 Act of Accession - Chapter 2 of Annex XII - Whether a Member State may derogate from Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 and Article 7(3) of Directive 2004/38/EC - Polish national who has not completed a period of 12 months’ registered work in the host Member State))

(2018/C 408/08)

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber)

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Rafal Prefeta

Respondent: Secretary of State for Work and Pensions

Operative part of the judgment

Chapter 2 of Annex XII to the Act concerning the conditions of accession of the Czech Republic, the Republic of Estonia, the Republic of Cyprus, the Republic of Latvia, the Republic of Lithuania, the Republic of Hungary, the Republic of Malta, the Republic of Poland, the Republic of Slovenia and the Slovak Republic and the adjustments to the Treaties on which the European Union is founded, must be interpreted as permitting, during the transitional period provided for by that act, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to exclude a Polish national, such as Mr Rafal Prefeta, from the benefits of Article 7(3) of Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States amending Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 and repealing Directives 64/221/EEC, 68/360/EEC, 72/194/EEC, 73/148/EEC, 75/34/EEC, 75/35/EEC, 90/364/EEC, 90/365/EEC and 93/96/EEC, when that person has not satisfied the requirement imposed by national law of having completed an uninterrupted 12-month period of registered work in the United Kingdom.

---

(1)  OJ C 38, 6.2.2017.

---
**CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM**

 

 

The Board of Directors

Given Imaging Ltd.

 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (Nos. 333-118473, 333-107630 and No. 333-333-73732) on Form S-8 of Given Imaging Ltd. (the “Company”) of our report dated February 7, 2006, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of the Company and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2005, which report appears in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2005.

 

/s/ Somekh Chaikin

Somekh Chaikin

Certified Public Accountants (Isr.)

Member firm of KPMG International

 

Tel - Aviv, Israel

April 5, 2006

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CRIMINAL ACTION

 :

v. :

 :

RICHARD BALLARD : NO. 03-810-01

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 13th day of April, 2012, upon consideration of defendant’s pro se

Motion Pursuant to Rule 60(b)(6) and Request for Equitable Tolling or in the Alternative Allow

Petitioner to Proceed Under F.R.Crim. P. 32(c)(3)(d) (Document No. 118, filed October 14,

2011) and the Government’s Response to Defendant’s Motion for Relief Under Rule 60(b)

(Document No. 125, filed February 23, 2012), for the reasons set forth in the Memorandum dated

April 13, 2012, IT IS ORDERED that defendant’s pro se Motion Pursuant to Rule 60(b)(6) and

Request for Equitable Tolling or in the Alternative Allow Petitioner to Proceed Under F.R.Crim.

P. 32(c)(3)(d) is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHERED ORDERED that a certificate of appealability will not issue on the

ground that defendant has not made a substantial showing of a denial of a constitutional right as

required under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).

BY THE COURT:

__/s/ Hon. Jan E. DuBois_______ 

 JAN E. DUBOIS, J.

Case 2:03-cr-00810-JD Document 129 Filed 04/13/12 Page 1 of 1
No. 49913.

#### Protests 944006-G, etc., of Sang Wo & Co. et al. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The merchandise was classified and claimed dutiable at the same rates and under the same paragraphs as similar merchandise covered by *Quong Yuen Shing Co.*v. *United States*(31 C. C. P. A. 43, C. A. D. 247). In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of said cited ease the merchandise at bar was found to contain salt and therefore excluded from paragraph 5. The protests were sustained to this extent.
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:  January 30, 2007
    By:
    /s/ C. S. LiollioC. S. LiollioPresident and
Chief Executive Officer
Document

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Directors and Shareholders
Eagle Bancorp, Inc.




We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statements (Nos. 333-135072, 333-153426, 331- 159755, 333-175966 333-187713, 333-199875 and 333-211957) on Form S-8 of Eagle Bancorp, Inc. of our reports dated March 1, 2021, with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Eagle Bancorp, Inc. and the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, which reports appear in Eagle Bancorp, Inc.’s 2020 Annual Report on Form 10-K. 






/s/ Dixon Hughes Goodman LLP


Charlotte, North Carolina
March 1, 2021








Report to the Directors and Shareholders    1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

GENERAL REFRACTORIES COMPANY,

Plaintiff,

v.

FIRST STATE INSURANCE COMPANY, et al.,

Defendants.

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

Civil Action No. 04-CV-3509

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

Kindly enter the appearance of Patricia B. Santelle, Esquire on behalf of the following 

defendants:

 AIU Insurance Company;

 Continental Insurance Company, as successor-in-interest to Certain Policies 

Issued by Harbor Insurance Company;

 Government Employees Insurance Company;

 Lexington Insurance Company;

 Republic Insurance Company (now known as Starr Indemnity Company); and

 Westchester Fire Insurance Company (incorrectly identified as “ACE USA as 

successor to International Insurance Company”). 

Respectfully submitted,

WHITE AND WILLIAMS LLP

By: /s/ Patricia B. Santelle

Patricia B. Santelle 

1650 Market Street

One Liberty Place, Suite 1800

Philadelphia, PA 19103

(215) 864-7000 Telephone

(215) 864-7123 Fax

Dated: July 2, 2012

Case 2:04-cv-03509-EL Document 469 Filed 07/02/12 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Patricia B. Santelle, Esquire, hereby certify that the foregoing Entry of Appearance was 

served via ECF on July 2, 2012.

/s/ Patricia B. Santelle

Patricia B. Santelle

WHITE AND WILLIAMS LLP

1650 Market Street

One Liberty Place, Suite 1800

Philadelphia, PA 19103

(215) 864-7000 Telephone

(215) 864-7123 Fax

9463794v.1

Case 2:04-cv-03509-EL Document 469 Filed 07/02/12 Page 2 of 2
No. 64780.

#### John C. Sleater Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 58/16477, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of vinyl plastic mats similar in use to paper, embossed, cut, or stamped into designs or shapes, not specially provided for, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# C_2017277EN.01001801.xml

| 21.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 277/18 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 277/18

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 14 June 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Landgericht Trier — Germany) — Verband Sozialer Wettbewerb eV v TofuTown.com GmbH

(Case C-422/16) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Common organisation of the markets in agricultural products - Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 - Article 78 and Annex VII, Part III - Decision 2010/791/EU - Definitions, designations and sales descriptions - ‘Milk’ and ‘milk products’ - Designations used for the promotion and marketing of purely plant-based products))

(2017/C 277/24)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Landgericht Trier

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Verband Sozialer Wettbewerb eV

Applicant:

Defendant: TofuTown.com GmbH

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 78(2) and Annex VII, Part III to Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 must be interpreted as precluding the term ‘milk’ and the designations reserved by that regulation exclusively for milk products from being used to designate a purely plant based product in marketing or advertising, even if those terms are expanded upon by clarifying or descriptive terms indicating the plant origin of the product at issue, unless that product is listed in Annex I to Commission Decision 2010/791/EU of 20 December 2010 listing the products referred to in the second subparagraph of point III(1) of Annex XII to Council Regulation (EC) No 1234/2007.

---

(1)  OJ C 350, 26.9.2016.

1

---
No. 50879.

#### Protests 111751-K, etc., of C. J. Tower & Sons (Buffalo).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that passed upon in *C. J. Tower & Sons*v. *United States*(14 Cust. Ct. 94, C. D. 919). In accordance therewith the claim for free entry was sustained.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

CARMEN COSENZA :

: CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-CV-4146

Plaintiff, :

:

v. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION;

BAYER AG;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE;

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM

:

:

:

:

:

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

:

Defendants. :

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of the Court:

Kindly enter the appearances of Hope S. Freiwald, Aline Fairweather, Erin

Brennan and Kirstin J. Miller as attorneys for defendant SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a

GlaxoSmithKline.

Respectfully Submitted,

_____________________________ _____________________________

Hope S. Freiwald Aline Fairweather

_____________________________ _____________________________

Erin Brennan Kirstin J. Miller

DECHERT PRICE & RHOADS

4000 Bell Atlantic Tower

1717 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2793

(215) 994-4000

Case 2:02-cv-04146-BWK Document 8 Filed 09/20/2002 Page 1 of 1
Case 2:04-cr-00382-ER Document 127 Filed 10/23/08 Page 1 of 12
Case 2:04-cr-00382-ER Document 127 Filed 10/23/08 Page 2 of 12
Case 2:04-cr-00382-ER Document 127 Filed 10/23/08 Page 3 of 12
Case 2:04-cr-00382-ER Document 127 Filed 10/23/08 Page 4 of 12
Case 2:04-cr-00382-ER Document 127 Filed 10/23/08 Page 5 of 12
Case 2:04-cr-00382-ER Document 127 Filed 10/23/08 Page 6 of 12
Case 2:04-cr-00382-ER Document 127 Filed 10/23/08 Page 7 of 12
Case 2:04-cr-00382-ER Document 127 Filed 10/23/08 Page 8 of 12
Case 2:04-cr-00382-ER Document 127 Filed 10/23/08 Page 9 of 12
Case 2:04-cr-00382-ER Document 127 Filed 10/23/08 Page 10 of 12
Case 2:04-cr-00382-ER Document 127 Filed 10/23/08 Page 11 of 12
Case 2:04-cr-00382-ER Document 127 Filed 10/23/08 Page 12 of 12
Before the Third Division,

December 2, 1952

No. 56962.

#### Arthur R. Cone, Inc., and Alltransport, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 177131-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of bird’s-foot trefoil seed *(Lotus*corniculatus) similar in all *410material respects to that the subject of *Transcontinental Seed, Inc. (Alltransport, Incorporated)*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 163, C. D. 1462), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Before the First Division,

November 30, 1961

No. 66242.

#### Alexander L. H. Darragh *v.*United States,

protest 287120-K (Detroit).

Opinion by

Oliver, O. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of double slip H.O. gauge model railroad switches, used to interrupt or control the flow of electricity, wholly or in chief value of metal, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MICHAEL GARCIA :

: CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-CV-4311

Plaintiff, :

:

v. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION;

BAYER AG;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE;

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM

:

:

:

:

:

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

:

Defendants. :

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of the Court:

Kindly enter the appearances of Hope S. Freiwald, Aline Fairweather, Erin

Brennan and Kirstin J. Miller as attorneys for defendant SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a

GlaxoSmithKline.

Respectfully Submitted,

_____________________________ _____________________________

Hope S. Freiwald Aline Fairweather

_____________________________ _____________________________

Erin Brennan Kirstin J. Miller

DECHERT PRICE & RHOADS

4000 Bell Atlantic Tower

1717 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2793

(215) 994-4000

Case 2:02-cv-04311-BWK Document 9 Filed 10/02/2002 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1

                  CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S. C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of RTG Ventures, Inc. (the
"Company") for the annual period ended August 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Linda
Perry, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:


     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) of
          15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.




Date: May 22, 2007                         /s/ Linda Perry
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Linda Perry,
                                           President and Chief Executive Officer
                                           (Principal Executive Officer)
# C_2015279EN.01004601.xml

| 24.8.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 279/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.8.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 279/46

---

Action brought on 27 June 2015 — Polski Koncern Naftowy Orlen v OHIM (Shape of a service station)

(Case T-339/15)

(2015/C 279/57)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Applicant: Polski Koncern Naftowy Orlen SA (Płock, Poland) (represented by: M. Siciarek, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Trade mark at issue: Three-dimensional Community trade mark (Shape of a service station) — Application No 12 411 071

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 2 April 2015 in Case R 2245/2014-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs, including those of the applicant in the course of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM and before the Court. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs, including those of the applicant in the course of the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM and before the Court.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b), Article 7(2) and Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b), Article 7(2) and Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
# C_2017086EN.01000302.xml

| 20.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 86/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 86/3

---

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 24 November 2016 — European Dynamics Luxembourg SA, European Dynamics Belgium SA, Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

(Case C-379/16 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice - Public service contracts - Software development and maintenance services - Misinterpretation of the arguments and distortion of the evidence submitted by the other party to the proceedings before the General Court))

(2017/C 086/04)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellants: European Dynamics Luxembourg SA, European Dynamics Belgium SA, Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE (represented by: C.-N. Dede and D. Papadopoulou, dikigoroi)

Appellants:

Other party to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: N. Bambara, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings:

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

| 1. | The appeal is dismissed. |
| --- | --- |

1.

The appeal is dismissed.

| 2. | European Dynamics Luxembourg SA, European Dynamics Belgium SA and Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE shall bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

European Dynamics Luxembourg SA, European Dynamics Belgium SA and Evropaïki Dynamiki — Proigmena Systimata Tilepikoinonion Pliroforikis kai Tilematikis AE shall bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 305, 22.8.2016.

1

---