alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

: CIVIL ACTION NOS.

:

ROCHELLE : 02-3867

MONTGOMERY : 02-3889

HINES : 02-3901

KARI, et al. : 02-3926

HABERMAN : 02-3936

MILEY : 02-3951

FRANCO, et al. : 02-3975

DAVIS : 02-4113

RUSSELL, et al. : 02-4116

HERNANDEZ, et al. : 02-4126

QUILLEN, et al. : 02-4167

SIMMONS, et al. : 02-4174

BIEDERMAN : 02-4194

DRY, et al. : 02-4225

COOK : 02-4237

STEFAN, et al. : 02-4277

WALKER, et al. : 02-4283

DUNCAN, et al. : 02-4301

:

VS. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION, et al. :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of July, 2002, the Court having been previously

advised that the above action cannot proceed to trial and disposition because of the following

reason:

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending disposition of a related

action.

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending determination of

arbitration proceedings.

[ ] - Interlocutory appeal filed.

Case 2:02-cv-04113-SD Document 2 Filed 07/10/2002 Page 1 of 2
[ X ] - Other: Case is placed into suspense pending receipt of the Case

Transfer Order from the Judicial Panel on Multi District Litigation

transferring case to District of Minnesota.

It is

ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this action closed for statistical purposes and

place the matter in the Civil Suspense File, and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction; and that the case be

restored to the trial docket when the action is in a status so that it may proceed to final

disposition; this order shall not prejudice the rights of the parties to this litigation.

BY THE COURT:

________________________________________

Stewart Dalzell, S.J.

Case 2:02-cv-04113-SD Document 2 Filed 07/10/2002 Page 2 of 2
----

|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | I,      George M. Hare, Chief Financial and Principal Accounting Officer of      Innotrac Corporation (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §      1350 as adopted by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,      that:   |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
| (1)    | the      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three and six months      ended June 30, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;      and |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
| (2)    | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company.                                                                                         |

|   | Dated:      August 14, 2009                                                   |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                          |
|   | /s/      George M. Hare                                                       |   |
|   | George      M. HareChief      Financial Officer (Principal AccountingOfficer) |
Case No. 6,655.

#### HOMANS v. MOORE.

[5 Cranch. C. C. 505.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

Nov. Term, 1838.

Justice op Peace — Jurisdiction.

1. A certiorari does not lie to a justice of the peace in a case of which he has jurisdiction.

2. A plaintiff may relinquish interest upon an open account and bring his action for the principal sum only, before a justice of the peace, if the principal does not exceed the sum of fifty dollars, although, with interest, the debt would exceed that sum.

Certiorari, to Mr. Justice Thompson, issued by the chief judge of this court on the 21st of March. 1S3S. in vacation, upon the petition and affidavit of the debtor, Benjamin Homans, which stated, in substance, that IV. IV. Moore had warranted him, before Mr. Justice Thompson, for §47.20, which, if due at all is due with interest from November, 1834, and that the debt and damages exceed the sum of §50, and the warrant and all proceedings under it are illegal and coram non judice. That to prevent an appeal, the creditor claimed a trial by jury; who rendered a verdict against the petitioner, upon which the justice rendered judgment. That he has a fair, bona fide, legal defence, which was not allowed him upon the trial. The petition was accompanied by another affidavit, stating that since the trial before the justice he has discovered that he can prove his set-off, which he did not know at the time of the trial; and that the present application is not for delay, but that substantial justice may be done. The certiorari was returned at the last term, and a rule laid upon Mr. Moore, the plaintiff, to file his declaration.

Mr. Hoban, for plaintiff,

noiv moved the court to quash the certiorari and all the proceedings thereon.

Mr. Bradley, contra,

relied upon the order of the chief judge for the certiorari.

THE COURT

(CRANCH, Chief Judge, not sitting)

decided that the creditor may relinquish the interest upon the claim and recover the principal before a justice of the peace, if the principal does not exceed §50; the claim being understood to be upon open account. Certiorari quashed.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

: CRIMINAL ACTION

 vs. : NO. 03-745-1

JUAN ANTONIO GARCIA-VILLA :

 

 

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 23RD day of FEBRUARY, 2012, pursuant to

certain rulings in this case the following motions are dismissed

as MOOT.

Document #127 Pro-Se motion for IFP

Document #128 Pro-Se motion to order Transcripts

AND IT IS SO ORDERED

S/SHARON CARTER_____________

 Sharon Carter, Deputy

 Chief Judge J. Curits Joyner
No. 57875.

protest 175301-K (New York).

#### N. Y. Bead Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with "stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of shell strands the same in all material respects as the articles involved in *Puerto Rican Handcrafts*v. *United States*(30 Cust. Ct. 18, C. D. 1493), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Virage Logic Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Adam
Kablanian, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


/s/ Adam Kablanian


Adam Kablanian
President and Chief Executive Officer
August 14, 2002
PRINCIPIOS PARA PROMOVER LA CONFIABILIDAD Y SEGURIDAD DE LOS SISTEMAS ELECTRICOS 

INTERCONECTADOS DE LOS ESTADOS UNIDOS DE AMERICA Y DE LOS ESTADOS UNIDOS MEXICANOS 

Considerando las operaciones transfronterizas establecidas y crecientes entre Mexico y Estados 

Unidos en materia de electricidad, y reconociendo los beneficios relacionados con el mantenimiento de 

la operaci6n confiable y la seguridad de ambos sistemas electricos interconectados (referido en los 

Estados Unidos de America como el "Bulk-Power System"), el Departamento de Energia (DOE) y la 

Comisi6n Federal de Regulaci6n Energetica (FERC) de los Estados Unidos de America, por una parte, y la 

Secretarla de Energia (SENER), la Comisi6n Reguladora de Energia (CRE) y el Centro Nacional de Control 

de Energia (CENACE) de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos, por otra parte (en lo sucesivo denominados 

colectivamente "Signatarios"), respaldan los siguientes Principios para promover la confiabilidad y la 

seguridad del sistema electrico interconectado en America del Norte: 

Principios 

1. Los Signatarios tienen la intenci6n de abordar eventos y riesgos identificables que afecten al 

sistema electrico, mejorando asl la confiabilidad del sistema electrico interconectado en los Estados 

Unidos Mexicanos y los Estados Unidos de America. 

2. Los Signatarios tienen la intenci6n de promover el desempeno confiable del sistema electrico 

interconectado de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos y los Estados Unidos de America, sin dar lugar a 

preferencias o discriminaciones indebidas. 

3. Los Signatarios tienen la intenci6n de aplicar los conocimientos actuales y los recurses de los que 

dispongan, para promover la mejora continua de operaciones confiables para el sistema electrico 

interconectado de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos y los Estados Unidos de America. 

4. Los Signatarios tienen la intenci6n de abordar los temas emergentes, conforme sean identificados, 

que tengan el potencial de impactar la operaci6n confiable del sistema electrico interconectado en 

los Estados Unidos Mexicanos y los Estados Unidos de America. 

5. Los Signatarios tienen la intenci6n de cooperar si ocurre un evento de confiabilidad transfronterizo, 

a fin de asegurar que las causas de tal evento sean plenamente comprendidas y mitigadas. 

6. Los Signatarios tienen la intenci6n de coordinarse para asegurar la consistencia necesaria para 

apoyar una operaci6n confiable, al mismo tiempo cumpliendo con las soberanas jurisdicciones con 

mandates de polltica y regulaci6n individuales. 

7. Estes Principios pueden ser modificados en cualquier memento, por mutuo consentimiento por 

escrito de todos los Signatarios. 

8. Los Signatarios tienen la intenci6n de implementar de buena fe estos Principios. 

9. Estes Principios pueden ser implementados mediante la Corporaci6n Norteamericana de 

Confiabilidad Electrica (NERC), una Organizaci6n de Confiabilidad Electrica (ERO) que puede 

funcionar sobre una base internacional. 

1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

John J. Koresko, V and PennMont Benefit
Services, Inc.

Plaintiffs,
v.

Jeff Bleiweis, Raymond Ankner, CJA and
Associates, Inc., and The Travelers Life and
Annuity Company

Defendants.

Civil Action No. 04-cv-769

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE AS CO-COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFFS

TO THE CLERK:

Kindly enter my appearance as co-counsel for the Plaintiffs in the above captioned

matter.

Dated: November 22, 2005

PHIDOCS-45968.1

ipl bin Pf ——p

William H. Pillsbury-(7-D. No. 93734)

Anderson Kill & Olick, P.C.
1600 Market Street, Suite 2500
Philadelphia, PA 19103

(215) 568-4202

Attorney for Plaintiffs


CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Thereby certify that I electronically filed this Entry of Appearance As Co-Counsel

with the Clerk of the Court using the ECF system, which constitutes service upon the following:

DIANE SIEGEL DANOFF

ROBERT ASHBROOK

DAVID N. SONTAG

DECHERT LLP

2929 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19104-2808

ATTORNEY FOR THE TRAVELERS LIIFE AND ANNUITY COMPANY

CRAIG R. TRACTENBERG

RENEE BERGMANN

NIXON PEABODY LLP

1818 Market Street, 11" Floor

Philadelphia, PA 19103

ATTORNEY FOR JEFF BLEIWEIS; RAYMOND ANKNER; CJA ASSOCIATES, INC.

DATED: November 22, 2005 VIM1712
Virginia I. Miller (ID. No. 85361)

ANDERSON KILL & OLICK, P.C.
1600 Market Street

Suite 2500

Philadelphia, PA 19103

(215) 568-4202

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

PHIDOCS-45968.1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

: CIVIL ACTION NOS.

:

HAYES : 02-3937

MCKNIGHT : 02-3954

SKOGLULND : 02-3979

BALLIRO : 02-4111

SADEIK : 02-4129

HAYWARD, et al. : 02-4133

WAINER, et al. : 02-4177

VAN STREEPEN, et al. : 02-4199

BAILEY : 02-4231

ABERCROMBIE, et al. : 02-4235

TRESSLAR, et al. : 02-4291

CONLEY, et al. : 02-4296

GLADHART, et al. : 02-4312

:

VS. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION, et al. :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of July, 2002, the Court having been previously

advised that the above action cannot proceed to trial and disposition because of the following

reason:

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending disposition of a related

action.

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending determination of

arbitration proceedings.

[ ] - Interlocutory appeal filed.

[ X ] - Other: Case is placed into suspense pending receipt of the Case

Transfer Order from the Judicial Panel on Multi District Litigation

transferring case to District of Minnesota..

Case 2:02-cv-04111-CMR Document 2 Filed 07/10/2002 Page 1 of 2
It is

ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this action closed for statistical purposes and

place the matter in the Civil Suspense File, and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction; and that the case be

restored to the trial docket when the action is in a status so that it may proceed to final

disposition; this order shall not prejudice the rights of the parties to this litigation.

BY THE COURT:

________________________________________

Cynthia M. Rufe, Judge

Case 2:02-cv-04111-CMR Document 2 Filed 07/10/2002 Page 2 of 2
No. 49946.

#### Protests 35348-K, etc., of Edward Boote (New York).

Opinion by

Keeee, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise in question is similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Copeland & Thompson*v. *United States*(12 Cust. Ct. 85, C. D. 833). In accordance therewith the merchandise was held dutiable at 30 percent ad valorem and 10 cents per dozen pieces under paragraph 211, as amended by T. D. 49753, as saucers valued at not less than 45 cents per dozen. The protests were sustained to this extent.
# C_2015205EN.01003502.xml

| 22.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 205/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 205/35

---

Action brought on 10 April 2015 — SLE Schuh v OHIM — Vigoss Tekstil Konfeksiyon Sanayi ve Ticaret (VIOS)

(Case T-191/15)

(2015/C 205/48)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: SLE Schuh GmbH (Graz, Austria) (represented by: A. Stolitzka, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Vigoss Tekstil Konfeksiyon Sanayi ve Ticaret Ltd Sirketi (Istanbul, Turkey)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Applicant: Applicant

Applicant:

Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘VIOS’ — Application No 11 283 546

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before OHIM

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 22 January 2015 in Case R 623/2014-5

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | uphold the action and alter the contested decision to the effect that registration of the mark ‘VIOS’ is allowed to proceed in respect of all the Classes and thus also in respect of:






  — | Class 18: Goods made of these materials (of leather and imitations of leather) and not included in other classes; Trunks and travelling bags; Parasols; |
| --- | --- | --- |

—

uphold the action and alter the contested decision to the effect that registration of the mark ‘VIOS’ is allowed to proceed in respect of all the Classes and thus also in respect of:

—

Class 18: Goods made of these materials (of leather and imitations of leather) and not included in other classes; Trunks and travelling bags; Parasols;

| — | Class 25: Clothing, headgear; |
| --- | --- |

—

Class 25: Clothing, headgear;

In the alternative:

| — | uphold the action and annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

uphold the action and annul the contested decision;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
No. 57609.

#### The American Import Company et al. *v.*United States,

protests 200926-K, etc. (Los Angeles).

*297Opinion by

Olives, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of articles in chief value of glass beads the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Walco Bead Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 62, C. D. 1445), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
# Mesa County Sheriff's Office sheriff Matt Lewis

Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue SW Washington DC 20591 To Whom it May Concern , 2 1 5 Ri ce Street 970-244-3500 Phone P.O. Box 20,000 970 -244-3503 Fax Grand Junction, Co
. 81502 www.sheriff
.mesacounty .us

UAS Program Di rector Benjamin Miller is founder and curre nt director of the U nmanned Aircraft program for the Mesa County Sheriff's Offi ce. The program began with Ben and he has been the driving force behind it since its inception. Many firsts in the use of UAS by publ ic safety have been accredited to this agency. This is due, in part , to Ben Miller's professionalism and attent ion to safety as a sk illed UAS operator. Ben has informed me that he , along with Draganfl y Innovations , will be requesting an exemption for him to fly Draganfly UAS products wit hout an FAA issued p i lot cert ification under Draganfl y's recentl y granted 333 exemption
. Ben is fully qualified to operate Draganfly UAS products in the NAS safely wit hout any further training
. He has met and exceeds our required 6 hours of UAS train ing a month. This standard is a higher than the 90 day cycle required i n the FAR. Ben has completed in excess of 82 flight hours on Dragan fly UAS, w ith 40 total operational missions to date
. Additionally, he wrote, has comp leted , and inst ructs in our 40 hour basic UAS Operations cou rse . Ben has a tremendous amount of operational UAS knowledge based on actual fl ight time and the development of our program . This level of expertise has no correlation to being an FAA certificated pilot and wou ld not be enhanced re lati ve to this area if required to become an FAA certificated pilot. I would not permit an individual to operate our UAS merely because they we re an FAA certificated pil ot. Our training programs are robust, efficient and produce well rounded , safe UAS operators. Please consider this exemption request as Ben Miller is a h ighly skilled UAS operator regardless of the lack of any FAA certifications in his possession
. Respectfull y,

Matt Lewis Mesa County Sheriff
Before the Third Division,

February 14, 1947

No. 51565.

#### Protests 33191-K, etc., of Matson Navigation Co. et al. (Honolulu, etc.).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Duke Capital LLC (Duke Capital) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steven K. Young, Chief Financial
Officer and Controller of Duke Capital, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Duke Capital.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                      
|--------------------------------------
|/S/    STEVEN K.
YOUNG                
|Steven K. Young                       
|Chief Financial Officer and Controller
|November 14, 2006
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, DC 20460

MEMORANDUM
DATE: 9110113 OFFICE OF CHEMICAL SAFETYAND POLLUTION PREVENTION



### SUBJECT: Orthosulfamuron Immunotoxicity Waiver Request. 

### PC Code: 108209 Decision No.: 480734 Petition No.: N/A Risk Assessment Type: N/ A TXRNo.: 0056786 MRID 

### No.: N/A
FROM:

THRU: Jaime D'Agostino, Toxicologist Risk Assessment Branch II Health Effects Division (7509P) Christina Swartz, Chief Risk Assessment Branch II Health Effects Division (7509P) 

### TO: Neil Anderson, RM 51 

### DP Barcode: D413020 Registration Nos.: NA Regulatory Action: Registration Review Case No.: NA CAS No.: 213464-77-8 40 CFR: N/A

Khue Nguyen, Chemical Review Manager Risk Management and Implementation Branch I Pesticide Re-evaluation Division (7508P) I. 

### CONCLUSION: HED agrees with the waiver request based on a decision to waive immunotoxicity studies for all sulfonylurea (SU) pesticides based on the minimal evidence of immunotoxicity in the available databases for SU pesticides, the liver, not the immune system is generally the target organ for this chemical class, points ofdepartures based on the most sensitive endpoints obtained via the appropriate routes ofexposure in the most sensitive species are currently used for dietary and non-dietary risk assessments, and there was no evidence of immunotoxicity with six other structurally-related sulfonylurea herbicides. (K. Rury, TXR#0056723, 8/6/2013). 

### II. ACTION REQUESTED: The Health Effects Division (HED) was asked to review a waiver request submitted by Isargo for an immunotoxicology study in conjunction with 

### Page 1 of2registration review for orthosulfamuron
. III. BACKGROUND: Orthosulfamuron, 1-(4,6-dimethoxypyrimidin

-2-yl)-3-[2- (dimethylcarbamoyl)phenylsulfamoyl]urea, is an herbicide ofthe sulfamoylurea class that is currently used on rice for the control ofannual and perennial broadleafweeds, sedges, and barnyard grass. Isagro has requested a waiver for an immunotoxicity study in response to a registration re view data call 

### in. HED agrees with the waiver request based on a decision to waive immunotoxicity studies for all sulfonylurea pesticides as a class 

### (K. Rury, TXR #0056723 , 8/6/2013).



### Page 2 of2
No. 49535.

#### Protests 94127-K (A), etc., of Penson & Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Walkeb, J.

It was stipulated that the hides and skins are the same in all material respects as those involved in *Rice*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct.118, C. D. 807), which record was incorporated herein. In accordance therewith those hides and skins in the cases at bar entered for consumption or withdrawn from warehouse subsequent to the effective date of the Argentine Trade Agreement (T. D. 50504) were held dutiable at 5 percent under paragraph 1530 (a) as modified, and those prior to such effective date were held dutiable at 10 percent under paragraph 1530 (a).