alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
[Cite as State ex rel. Gilbert v. Cincinnati, 122 Ohio St.3d 32, 2009-Ohio-2360.]

T HE S TATE EX REL . G ILBERT ET AL ., A PPELLANTS , v . C ITY OF C INCINNATI ET AL ., A PPELLEES . [Cite as State ex rel Gilbert v. Cincinnati,

122 Ohio St.3d 32, 2009-Ohio-2360.] Appeal dismissed as moot. (No. 2008-0029

— Submitted April 21, 2009

— Decided May 27, 2009.)
A PPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Hamilton County, No. C-070166, 174 Ohio App.3d 89, 2007-Ohio-6332.

__________________ {¶ 1} This cause is before the cour t upon appellants’ appeal from a judgment of the court of app eals denying a writ of mandamus. {¶ 2} On June 12, 2008, we granted appe llants’ motion for a partial remand to allow the court of appeals to rule on the motion for relief from judgment that appellants had filed in that court. The court of appeals subsequently granted the motion for relief from judgment and, on March 13, 2009, granted the writ of mandamu s sought by appellants. State ex rel. Gilbert v.
Cincinnati , Hamilton App. No. C-070166, 2009-Ohio-1078. {¶ 3} Accordingly, this cause is dismissed as moot.
M OYER , C.J., and P FEIFER , L UNDBERG S TRATTON , O’C ONNOR , O’D ONNELL , L ANZINGER , and C UPP , JJ., concur.

__________________ Manley Burke, L.P.A., Matthew W. Fe llerhoff, and Daniel J. McCarthy, for appellants.

__________________
No. 53882.

#### Ford Radio & Mica Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 66259-K, etc. (New York).

*328Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the issue herein is the same in all material respects as that presented in *Mamary Bros., Inc.*v. *United States*(21 Cust. Ct. 135, C. D. 1142). In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries involved.
No. 51299.

#### Protests 965429-G/88183, etc., of Butler Bros. et al. (Chicago, etc.).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
E

C

/R Incorporated Providing Environmental Technical Support Since 1989

501 Eastowne Drive, Suite 250  Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514

Telephone: (919)484-0222  Fax: (919) 484-0122

MEMORANDUM

Date: August 18, 2010

To: Bruce Moore, EPA/OAQPS/SPPD/CCG

From: Heather Brown, EC/R Incorporated

Subject: Documentation of the May 13, 2010 EPA site visit to the Chesapeake Cotton Belt 

Compressor Station in Grapevine, Texas. 

I. INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this site visit was to examine a compressor station with an amine treater 

in the Barnett Shale area and discuss opportunities for air emissions with the operators.

II. LOCATION AND DATE

The site visit took place on May 13, 2010, at the Chesapeake’s Cotton Belt Compressor 

Station located in Grapevine, Texas, in Tarrant County.

III. ATTENDEES

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA/OAQPS)

Alex MacPherson, Health and Environmental Impacts Division, Air Benefit and Cost Group

Bruce Moore, Sector Policies and Programs Division, Coatings and Chemicals Group

Jodi Howard, Sector Policies and Programs Division, Coatings and Chemicals Group

Nick Parsons, Sector Policies and Programs Division, Coatings and Chemicals Group

Rachel Agnew, Sector Policies and Programs Division, Measurement Policy Group

EC/R Incorporated

Heather Brown

Phil Norwood

Robert Vogt

The site visit report for this facility contains confidential business information (CBI), and 

pending approval by the facility, a non-confidential report has not been issued.
# C_2015245EN.01003902.xml

| 27.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 245/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 245/39

---

Action brought on 22 May 2015 — Spirig Pharma v OHIM (Daylong)

(Case T-261/15)

(2015/C 245/47)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Spirig Pharma (Egerkingen, Switzerland) (represented by: T. de Haan and P. Péters, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Trade mark at issue: figurative mark containing the word element ‘Daylong’ — Application for registration No 12 537 627

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 24 March 2015 in Case R 2455/2014-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs, including those of the applicant in the course of the proceedings before the fourth Board of Appeal of the Office. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs, including those of the applicant in the course of the proceedings before the fourth Board of Appeal of the Office.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009, read in conjunction with Article 75 of the same regulation; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009, read in conjunction with Article 75 of the same regulation;

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
<PAGE>

                         HOME LOAN FINANCIAL CORPORATION
                                  EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Home Loan Financial Corporation (the
"Corporation") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2003, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date of this Certification (the
"Report"), I, Robert C. Hamilton, the President of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
         of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Corporation.




                                /s/ Robert C. Hamilton
                                -----------------------------------
                                Robert C. Hamilton, President

                                Date: May 15, 2003

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Corporation and will be retained by the Corporation and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                                             30.
Document

Exhibit 10.36

David M. Cordani
President and CEO

Routing  W2SLT
900 Cottage Grove Road
Hartford, CT 06152
Telephone  860.226.7482
Facsimile  860.226.3099


December 6, 2020




Matthew Manders


Dear Matt:


I am pleased to offer the following compensation package in connection with your assumption of the role of President, Government Business and Enterprise Solutions, reporting to me, effective January 1, 2021, subject to your written acceptance below: 


•Base Salary – will increase to a pre-tax annualized rate of $1,000,000.  


•Annual Incentive – your annual target will increase to $1,250,000 for the 2021 performance year.  


•Long-Term Incentive – your annual long-term incentive target will increase to $4,250,000 for the 2021 annual grant.




NEW TOTAL ANNUAL COMPENSATION OPPORTUNITY:            $6,500,000
    
 The changes above have no impact on previously awarded bonuses, stock options, or SPS grants.  As an executive of the company, your compensation will be subject to any future program changes.


Matt, I look forward to continuing to partner with you.


Sincerely,




/s/ David M. Cordani


David M. Cordani


cc:    K. Gorodetzer
       J. Murabito


Please indicate your acceptance of our offer by signing below and returning a copy to me no later than Tuesday, December 8, 2020.


Acceptance:    /s/ Matthew Manders


Date:        December 8, 2020
Case 2:04-cv-02841-SD Document 276 Filed 06/04/09 Page 1 of 29
Case 2:04-cv-02841-SD Document 276 Filed 06/04/09 Page 2 of 29
Case 2:04-cv-02841-SD Document 276 Filed 06/04/09 Page 3 of 29
Case 2:04-cv-02841-SD Document 276 Filed 06/04/09 Page 4 of 29
Case 2:04-cv-02841-SD Document 276 Filed 06/04/09 Page 5 of 29
Case 2:04-cv-02841-SD Document 276 Filed 06/04/09 Page 6 of 29
Case 2:04-cv-02841-SD Document 276 Filed 06/04/09 Page 7 of 29
Case 2:04-cv-02841-SD Document 276 Filed 06/04/09 Page 8 of 29
Case 2:04-cv-02841-SD Document 276 Filed 06/04/09 Page 9 of 29
Case 2:04-cv-02841-SD Document 276 Filed 06/04/09 Page 10 of 29
Case 2:04-cv-02841-SD Document 276 Filed 06/04/09 Page 11 of 29
Case 2:04-cv-02841-SD Document 276 Filed 06/04/09 Page 12 of 29
Case 2:04-cv-02841-SD Document 276 Filed 06/04/09 Page 13 of 29
Case 2:04-cv-02841-SD Document 276 Filed 06/04/09 Page 14 of 29
Case 2:04-cv-02841-SD Document 276 Filed 06/04/09 Page 15 of 29
Case 2:04-cv-02841-SD Document 276 Filed 06/04/09 Page 16 of 29
Case 2:04-cv-02841-SD Document 276 Filed 06/04/09 Page 17 of 29
Case 2:04-cv-02841-SD Document 276 Filed 06/04/09 Page 18 of 29
Case 2:04-cv-02841-SD Document 276 Filed 06/04/09 Page 19 of 29
Case 2:04-cv-02841-SD Document 276 Filed 06/04/09 Page 20 of 29
Case 2:04-cv-02841-SD Document 276 Filed 06/04/09 Page 21 of 29
Case 2:04-cv-02841-SD Document 276 Filed 06/04/09 Page 22 of 29
Case 2:04-cv-02841-SD Document 276 Filed 06/04/09 Page 23 of 29
Case 2:04-cv-02841-SD Document 276 Filed 06/04/09 Page 24 of 29
Case 2:04-cv-02841-SD Document 276 Filed 06/04/09 Page 25 of 29
Case 2:04-cv-02841-SD Document 276 Filed 06/04/09 Page 26 of 29
Case 2:04-cv-02841-SD Document 276 Filed 06/04/09 Page 27 of 29
Case 2:04-cv-02841-SD Document 276 Filed 06/04/09 Page 28 of 29
Case 2:04-cv-02841-SD Document 276 Filed 06/04/09 Page 29 of 29
# C_2015198EN.01004202.xml

| 15.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 198/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 198/42

---

Action brought on 16 April 2015 — Intervog/OHIM (meet me)

(Case T-190/15)

(2015/C 198/58)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Intervog (Paris, France) (represented by: M.-R. Hirsch, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Trade mark at issue: Figurative Community mark containing the word elements ‘meet me’ — Application for registration No 12 010 781

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 February 2015 in Case R 845/2014-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 (failure to state reasons); |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 (failure to state reasons);

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (error of assessment in the analysis of the mark’s distinctive character); |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 (error of assessment in the analysis of the mark’s distinctive character);

| — | Infringement of the principle of equality. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of the principle of equality.

---
Document

Exhibit 10.26


SECOND AMENDMENT TO
THE
Amedisys, Inc. 2018 OMNIBUS Incentive COMPENSATION PLAN


This Second Amendment (this “Amendment”) to the Amedisys, Inc. 2018 Omnibus Incentive Compensation Plan, as amended (the “Plan”), is entered into this 21st day of October, 2020, by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Committee”) of Amedisys, Inc. (the “Company”), as authorized pursuant to Section 19 of the Plan.


WHEREAS, the Company established and maintains the Plan, as it may be amended and/or restated from time to time; 


    WHEREAS, Section 19 of the Plan permits the Committee to amend the Plan without stockholder approval as set forth therein; and 


    WHEREAS, the Committee now desires to amend the Plan to amend the definition of “Employment” to clarify the effect of a change in status of a Participant.


    NOW, THEREFORE, for Awards that vest or are granted on and after October 21, 2020, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:


1.


Section 2.20 of the Plan is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following:


    2.20    “Employment” means, except as otherwise required by Section 409A of the Code, continuous, uninterrupted full time employment with the Company or any Affiliate or Subsidiary, and shall include the provision of services as an Outside Director or Consultant for the Company or any Affiliate or Subsidiary; provided, however, that a change in a Participant’s status from an Employee or Outside Director to a Consultant shall constitute a termination of Employment as an Employee or Outside Director, as applicable, and shall constitute a new Employment as a Consultant, and for the avoidance of doubt, a change in a Participant’s status from a full time Employee to a part time Employee shall constitute a termination of Employment as an Employee under this Plan. A Participant’s Employment shall terminate on the date (i) the Participant’s status changes as set forth in the preceding sentence or (ii) the Participant is no longer employed by an entity that is at least one of the Company, an Affiliate or a Subsidiary as of such date. “Employed” shall have a correlative meaning.


    Except as specifically set forth above, the terms of the Plan shall continue in full force and effect.




1










IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Committee has caused this Amendment to be adopted and executed effective October 21, 2020.


                    Amedisys, Inc.


                    By:  /s/ Julie D. Klapstein            


                    Name: Julie D. Klapstein


                    Title: Compensation Committee Chair


                    




2
Case 2:04-cv-00650-CN Document 18 Filed 02/11/05 Page 1 of 1
### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14

- 31232 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff

- Appellee

v.

CHRISTOPHER JOSEPH

,

Defendant

- Appellant

Appeal s from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 2 :13

- CR

- 184

Before REAVLEY, SMITH, and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Christopher Joseph has moved for

l eave to withdraw and has filed brief s in accordance with Anders v. California

, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores , 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011).

Joseph h a s not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief s and the

relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review.

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5 , the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED February 1, 2016

Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 14-31232 Document: 00513363245 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/01/2016No. 14

- 31232

2 Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is

excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

See 5 TH C IR

. R. 42.2. Case: 14-31232 Document: 00513363245 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/01/2016
**Exhibit      99.8**

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO**

**18        U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS        ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION        906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1) | The                  Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or                  15(d) of                  the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|-----|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | The                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Fund. |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| /s/                  Gordon J. Kerr                                                                                    |   |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
| Gordon                  J. KerrPresident                  and Chief Executive Officerof                  EnerMark Inc. |   |

*The        foregoing certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section        18        of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.        Such        certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any        filing        under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the        registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.*
EXHIBIT 31.1

                             FORM 10-K CERTIFICATION

      I, Anthony N. Renzi, certify that:

      1. I have reviewed the annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
2005, and all reports on Form 8-K containing distribution or servicing reports
filed in respect of periods included in the year covered by that annual report,
of the trust (the "Trust") created pursuant to the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement dated August 17, 2005 (the "P&S Agreement") among Residential Asset
Mortgage Products, Inc. (the "Company"), GMAC Mortgage Corporation (the
"Servicer") and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company (the "Trustee");

      2. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a
whole, does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state
a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading as of the
last day of the period covered by that annual report;

      3. Based on my knowledge, the servicing information required to be
provided to the Trustee by the Servicer under the P&S Agreement is included in
these reports;

      4. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the Servicer
under the P&S Agreement and based upon my knowledge and the review required
under the P&S Agreement, and, except as disclosed in the report, the Servicer
has fulfilled its obligations under the P&S Agreement; and

      5. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the
Servicer's compliance with the minimum servicing standards based upon the report
provided by an independent public accountant , after conducting a review in
compliance with the Uniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers, or
similar procedure, as set forth in the P&S Agreement, that is included in these
reports.

      In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on
information provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties: Deutsche Bank
National Trust Company.

Date:   March 28, 2006

        /s/ Anthony N. Renzi
        ----------------------------
Name:   Anthony N. Renzi
Title:  Executive Vice President
# C_2015337EN.01002501.xml

| 12.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 337/25 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 337/25

---

Action brought on 25 July 2015 — Fulmen v Council

(Case T-405/15)

(2015/C 337/25)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Fulmen (Tehran, Iran) (represented by: A. Bahrami and N. Korogiannakis, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare the application admissible and well founded; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare the application admissible and well founded;

| — | order the Council to pay the sum of EUR 1 1 0 09  560 in respect of material damage and the sum of EUR 1 00  000 in respect of non-material damage; and |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council to pay the sum of EUR 1 1 0 09  560 in respect of material damage and the sum of EUR 1 00  000 in respect of non-material damage; and

| — | order the Council to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law, alleging serious misconduct on the part of the Council, including misuse of its powers.

The applicant claims that the Council did not have the slightest evidence against it to support the reasons for including the applicant’s name on the list of persons and entities subject to restrictive measures against Iran and that the Council used the contested measures in order to harm Iran’s industrial capacity and economic development.

---
No. 50872.

#### Protests 838843-G, etc., of Metropolitan Pottery Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of bonbon dishes similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Butler Bros.*(33 C. C. P. A. 22, C. A. D. 310). In accordance therewith the merchandise was held properly dutiable at 70 percent under paragraph 212 without the additional assessment of 10 cents per dozen pieces.
United States Department of Agriculture
United States Department of Agriculture
United States Department of Agriculture
United States Department of Agriculture
United States Department of Agriculture
United States Department of Agriculture
United States Department of Agriculture
United States Department of Agriculture
United States Department of Agriculture
No. 51608.

#### Protest 608443-G of Harold Abrams & Bro. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The record showed that the merchandise consists of hats or hoods known as harvest hats, valued at less than $3 per dozen, similar in all material respects to those involved in *Caradine Hat Co.*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 69, C. D. 664). In accordance therewith and following the authority cited, the hats imported and withdrawn for consumption prior to the effective date of T. D. 48075 were held dutiable at 25 percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (5), and those imported or withdrawn for consumption subsequent to that date were held dutiable at 12)4 percent under said paragraph.
No. 49547.

#### Protests 841651-G, etc., of O. Yoshizawa Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

From the record it was found that the hats are similar to those involved in *Caradine*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 69, C. D. 664). In accordance therewith those imported and withdrawn for consumption prior to *241the effective date of the Netherlands Trade Agreement were held dutiable at 25 percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (5), and those subsequent to said date were held dutiable at *12%*percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (5) and T. D. 48075.