alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document

EXHIBIT 10.59

FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE 
COLUMBIA STATE BANK 
ENDORSEMENT METHOD SPLIT DOLLAR AGREEMENT 
(By and Between Columbia State Bank and Christopher Merrywell)
This First Amendment to the Columbia State Bank Endorsement Method Split Dollar Agreement (hereinafter "Amendment") is made and entered into effective as of Nov. 23rd, 2020, by and between Columbia State Bank ("Bank"), and Christopher Merrywell ("Insured"). This Amendment hereby amends the January 15, 2013 Columbia State Bank Endorsement Method Split Dollar Agreement by and between the parties ("Original Agreement"), as follows:
The following life insurance policies shall be added to the identified policies appearing on page 1 of the Original Agreement under the heading of "Insurer/Policy" and shall be incorporated into and subject to the terms of the Original Agreement:
Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance Company Policy #85299542 The Penn Mutual Life Insurance Company Policy #2840084
Whereas the Original Agreement and this Amendment reference specific life insurance Policy(ies) and such Policy(ies) are subject to exchange for new policies insuring Insured ("Replacement Policy[ies]"), the parties agree that any Replacement Policy(ies) will be accorded the same treatment under the Original Agreement (and any amendment thereto) as the existing Policy(ies) and shall in all respects replace the Policy(ies) for which it was exchanged. Furthermore, Insured agrees to cooperate with Bank in all exchanges by providing and promptly returning signatures as requested by Bank, Named Fiduciary or Plan Administrator.
To the extent that any paragraph, term, or provision of the Original Agreement is not specifically amended herein, or in any other amendment thereto, said paragraph, term, or provision shall remain in full force and effect as set forth in said Original Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Insured and a duly authorized Bank officer have signed this Amendment as of the written date.
            
												
	COLUMBIA STATE BANK	INSURED
				
	By:	 /s/ DAVE LAWSON	By:	/s/ CHRIS MERRYWELL
		Dave Lawson		Insured
		EVP/Chief Human Resources Officer		
				
	Date:	11/23/2020	Date:	11/23/2020
				
				
				
				




Merrywell20201111
Exhibit 31.1





CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER


CERTIFICATION


I, Michael Rapino, certify that:


1. I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the  Annual Report on Form 10-K of Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.;


2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;


3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report.








Date:June 23, 2017By:/s/ Michael RapinoMichael RapinoPresident and Chief Executive Officer
# C_2016059EN.01003201.xml

| 15.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 59/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 59/32

---

Action brought on 3 December 2015 — Almashreq Investment Fund v Council

(Case T-709/15)

(2016/C 059/35)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Almashreq Investment Fund (Damascus, Syria) (represented by: E. Ruchat, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare the applicant’s action admissible and well founded; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare the applicant’s action admissible and well founded;

| — | as a consequence, order the European Union to repair all of the harm allegedly suffered by the applicant at an amount to be fixed equitably by the Court; |
| --- | --- |

—

as a consequence, order the European Union to repair all of the harm allegedly suffered by the applicant at an amount to be fixed equitably by the Court;

| — | order an expert to be appointed in order to establish the total extent of the harm suffered by the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

order an expert to be appointed in order to establish the total extent of the harm suffered by the applicant;

| — | order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law, alleging the fact that it has suffered non-material damage, consisting of harm to its reputation, as a direct causal link to the measures taken by the Council of the European Union, for which the Council is liable.

---
Exhibit 99.1

Statement of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code

 

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, I, Dale G. Rettinger, the Chief Financial Officer of PDC 2000-D Limited Partnership, hereby certify that: 

- I have reviewed the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;
- the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
- the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 

_/s/ Dale G. Rettinger                       

Name: Dale G. Rettinger

Title: Chief Financial Officer

Date: __March 25, 2003_________
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

   Schedule of Year-To-Date Principal and Interest Distributions
                           to
                  Certificateholders
                                                                              Ending
Class                   Interest             Principal      Losses           Balance
<S>                     <C>                  <C>            <C>              <C>
AI                     5,784,678.67      33,509,677.16         0.00        196,490,322.83
AII                    3,440,118.44       5,753,068.38         0.00        102,046,931.62
B                        113,561.36               0.00         0.00          3,883,755.08
RI                             0.00               0.00         0.00                  0.00
RII                            0.00               0.00         0.00                  0.00
RIII                           0.00               0.00         0.00                  0.00

</TABLE>
Case No. 6,669.

#### HOOF v. LADD.

[1 Cranch. C. C. 167.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

June Term, 1804.

Landlord and Tenant — Term — Holding Over.

If a tenant who has occupied and paid rent annually, holds over into a new year, it is evidence of a new demise for a year.

Debt for rent — demise for one year.

THE COURT,

was of opinion that although no special agreement was made about the rent, yet if the defendant had occupied and paid rent annually; and had continued into a second year, it was evidence of a new demise for one year. So if he had paid rent monthly, it would be a demise for a month, &c.
No. 50318.

#### Protests 57259-K, etc., of Bermuda Shop et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83, decided February 5, 1945.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the '‘free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries. The protests were sustained to this extent.
Exhibit 32.2


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dragon International Group Corp.
on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, Xiali Gan, Principal
Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


February 12, 2008


                                    By: /s/ Xiali Gan
                                    -----------------------
                                    Xiali Gan, CFO and Chief Accounting Officer
No. 58890.

protests 204987-K, etc. (New York).

#### The Singer Manufacturing Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of sewing-machine heads similar in all material respects to those the subject of *The Singer Manufacturing Co.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 60, C. D. 1635), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1052 Engrossed in Senate (ES)]

<DOC>
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1052

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

 
  To strengthen the use of patient-experience data within the benefit-
               risk framework for approval of new drugs.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Better Empowerment Now to Enhance 
Framework and Improve Treatments Act of 2017'' or the ``BENEFIT Act of 
2017''.

SEC. 2. STRENGTHENING THE USE PATIENT-EXPERIENCE DATA WITHIN BENEFIT-
              RISK FRAMEWORK.

    Section 569C of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 
360bbb-8c) is amended--
            (1) in subsection (a)(1)--
                    (A) in subparagraph (A), by striking ``; and'' and 
                inserting a semicolon;
                    (B) in subparagraph (B), by striking the period and 
                inserting ``; and''; and
                    (C) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(C) as part of the risk-benefit assessment 
                framework in the new drug approval process described in 
                section 505(d), considering relevant patient-focused 
                drug development data, such as data from patient 
                preference studies (benefit-risk), patient reported 
                outcome data, or patient experience data, developed by 
                the sponsor of an application or another party.''; and
            (2) in subsection (b)(1). by inserting ``, including a 
        description of how such data and information were considered in 
        the risk benefit assessment described in section 505(d)'' 
        before the period.

            Passed the Senate August 3, 2017.

            Attest:

                                                             Secretary.
115th CONGRESS

  1st Session

                                S. 1052

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 AN ACT

  To strengthen the use of patient-experience data within the benefit-
               risk framework for approval of new drugs.
```
### Adams , Kevi n (OST) From : Denni s Hanna n [hannan_dennis@hotmail.com ] Sent : Tuesday , Jul y06 , 201 0 7:0 4 P M To : Adams , Kevi n (OST ) Subject : Essentia l Servic e t o Lak e Minchumina

. Denni s Hanna n & Lis aGriffith s 1 9 Holme s R d Lak e Minchumina , A K

9975 7 (907 ) 674-322 8 Jul y 6 , 201 0 ^:A cr >

•::.".: '

• ^' i

Dea r Kevi n Adams ; A s lon g standin g Minchumin aresident s nearl y entirel y dependen t o n th e mai l plan e for

trave l t o an dfro mth e lake , an dmyself

, asteadfas t

boar dmembe r

o f th e Homeowner s Association , ironically , rule dineligibl e t o vot e i n th e recen t

communit y collaboratio n concernin g ou r nex t essentia l servic e ai r

carrier , du e t o my absenc e a t th e tim e of th e meeting , I woul dlik e t o expres s ou r support for th e Wright s Ai r

Servic e proposals

. Havin g endure d th e pas t tw o year s o f

dubiou s schedulin g practice db y ou r curren t provider , w e loo k

forwar dt o workin g witha new , mor e reliabl e carrier

. An dbase do n ou r persona l experienc e with al l thre e biddin g airlines , Wrights , i n ou r opinion , i s fa

r an dawa y th e mos t

reputable , reliable , friendl y an daccommodating

. Wright s als o know s th e community well

. Base do n pas t transactions , a s wel l a s wor do f mouth , w e harbo r

th e u p mos t

confidenc e i n thei r commitmen t

t o custome r

satisfaction

. Likewise , w e als o favo r th e 2 da y awee k

optio n believin g that

th e community' s economi c viability wil l improv e significantl y with mor e frequen t (an dreliable ) mai l an dtrave l opportunities

. Than k yo u for your tim e an dattention

. Sincerely , Denni s Hanna n Lis aGriffith s
避免財務陷阱

辨別和避開騙術、騙局、欺詐及其他陷阱

來自:
避免財務陷阱

由於貸款交易看起來往往很複雜,貸款人自然需要依賴專業人員的專長,

在他們的指導下完成貸款手續。但如果您選擇的「專業人員」其實是騙子

或掠奪者,他們的目的是想讓您多花錢或給您造成風險怎麼辦?如果您不

知道潛在騙局有哪些特徵,您便有可能成為受害者。學會辨別和避開陷阱

與騙局很重要,尤其是在經濟困難的時候,它們可能會損害您的信用、給

您造成經濟困難,有時甚至導致您失去房屋。

辨別掠奪性貸款和濫用性貸款的特徵

營銷人員每天發出各種各樣的邀約,諸如信貸、住房

淨值貸款、抵押貸款人壽保險、再融資等等之類的邀

約。您一定要瞭解合法貸款與掠奪性貸款或濫用性貸

款之間的區別。下面是值得懷疑的一些特徵:

 屢次勸說您在很短的時間內對貸款進行再融資(稱

為「抵押貸款翻轉」),並且對每次再融資收取很

高的點數和費用。這些公司或許會說,您每次再融

資得到的利率會越來越優惠,但您一定要想一想,

您為每次新貸款交易支付的額外費用和利息是多

少。

 將貸款與躉繳保費信用保險產品(例如信用人壽保

險)相「捆綁」,而不充分披露保險的承保範圍、

成本或額外費用。

 向原本可以享受更低利率和費用的貸款人收取過高

的利率和費用。

 要求在付款日程表結束時支付「最後一筆大額尾付

償付款」,這是一筆高額的一次性付款,目的是掩

蓋貸款的真實成本,其數額往往超乎預期。

需要避開的騙局 

需要避開的一些常見騙局如下:

 打著住宅可負擔計劃的旗號行騙:有些人要求您支

付費用才會為您提供諮詢服務或修改拖欠的貸款。

如果您支付抵押貸款有困難,聯邦「住宅可負擔計

劃」(英文簡稱為MHA)可免費為您提供再融資和

貸款修改服務。

 房屋產權騙局:有些人以提供貸款或快速獲得現金

為誘餌,騙取您的房屋產權。您需要繼續償還抵押

貸款,但您卻不再是物業的業主。

 騙取住房淨值的止贖「援助」騙局:有些人提議購

買您的房屋,以償還您拖欠的抵押貸款。作為條

件,您可以繼續以租客身份住在房屋裡,並且可以

選擇在您財務狀況好轉的時候再將房子買回來。然

後「買方」會提取您辛苦積累的住房淨值,從此消

失無蹤。

 止贖援助騙局:他們偽裝成專業人員,許諾有辦法

避免止贖,並且往往索取很高的價錢。如果他們無

法兌現承諾,您將面臨現金短缺,並且會失去房

屋。

 住宅改良貸款騙局:承包商要求提前付款,卻不完

成工作。另一種情況是,承包商完成了工作,但索

要的費用遠遠高於當初的估算。

 災後保險騙局:發生災難後,有些人提議借錢給

您,作為交換條件,您必須將保險公司後來支付的

理賠金讓給他們。結果是您從這些人手裡拿到的

錢遠遠少於保險公司直接向您支付的實際理賠金數

額。 

 短售欺詐:一些不講職業操守的房地產代理人、抵

押貸款經紀人或其他業內專業人員可能引誘您以低

於市值的價格將房屋賣給與他們有關係的人,然後

立刻轉手賣給第三方從中獲利。雖然這樣做可以避

免止贖,但如果您的物業價值對貸款機構造成了誤

導,則可能被視為欺詐行為。 

避免借貸陷阱

在申請貸款時,應牢記下面的建議:

 不要相信「天上掉錢」的好事。如果有人告訴您「

信用問題不會影響貸款利率」,您要小心謹慎。如

果貸款邀約確實很有吸引力,不妨用筆記下來,然

後再徵求其他人的意見。
 貨比三家。多與幾家貸款機構接洽,才能找到最合

適的貸款。有些貸款產品或借貸規則或許看起來很

公道,但那只是因為沒有與其他貸款機構的類似貸

款產品進行比較。

 瞭解提前還款罰金。瞭解提前償還貸款是否會收取

費用。如果貸款有這種條款,應當問一下有沒有其

他產品不包含這類罰金。

 確保文件的正確性。如果任何人提議幫您偽造收入

資訊來獲得貸款,您要小心謹慎。絕不能偽造任何

資訊或簽署您明知是偽造的文件。

 確保文件的完整性。不要簽署日期有錯誤或有空白

欄的文件。如果有人承諾貸款機構「隨後會更正錯

誤」或「隨後會填寫」,不要輕易相信。

 詢問有哪些附加費。如果發現任何您未曾申請的項

目或您不瞭解的項目,應在別人要求您簽署貸款文

件之前詢問清楚。在辦理過戶手續的時候,如果發

現任何費用或收費與之前披露者不同,應當推遲過

戶,等您瞭解清楚所有條款時再說。

 瞭解總體費用。要求貸款機構提供包含所有點數和

費用的書面估算。將估算數字與年百分率(英文簡

稱為APR)相比較,該百分率依據貸款的利率以及

點數和費用確定。

 與合法的信用顧問合作。謹防有些機構打著信用諮

詢和信用合併的旗號行騙。如果想將信用卡債務或

其他債務合併到住宅貸款中,應當先瞭解所有相關

事實,然後再作決定。

 保護住房淨值。如果您想提取物業的淨值,應當只

提取最低限額。住房淨值通常需要很長時間慢慢積

累,因此請務必努力保護它。

 如果您沒有把握,則不要簽字!首先向聲譽良好的

消費者信用諮詢機構或住房顧問徵求建議。

如需更多資訊 

 謹防騙子!瞭解您所在地區的常見騙局,並在訂立

下一份貸款協議之前獲得建議。詳細瞭解常見的騙

局:FreddieMac.com/avoidfraud。

 房地美CreditSmart®課程為消費者提供指南,幫助他

們建立更好的信用、合理地管理資金,以及成為負

責任的房主。瀏覽 FreddieMac.com/creditsmart 下

載消費者課程資源,有五種語言可供選擇。

 「買房需要知道的事情」(About Homeownership)

是房地美的一項線上指南,介紹買房流程以及如何

成功地擁有住房。瀏覽 FreddieMac.com/ 

homeownership。

 瀏覽「購買和擁有住宅」(Buying and Owning 

a Home)的「避免抵押貸款欺詐」(Avoiding 

Mortgage Fraud)版面,房地美在該版面提供線

上指南,介紹買房流程以及如何成功地擁有住

房:FreddieMac.com/avoidfraud。

 如果想查找您附近的住宅與城市發展部(英文簡稱

為HUD)認定的住房諮詢機構,請瀏覽 

http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src=/i_ 

want_to/talk_to_a_housing_counselor或致電

800-569-4287。

 如果想詳細瞭解聯邦住宅可負擔計劃,請瀏覽

www.MakingHomeAffordable.gov。

來源 

內容根據以下資源改編:

 房地美屢次獲獎的多語言財務教育課程CreditSmart,該課程旨在幫助消費者建立和保持更好的信用,作出合理的財務決定,以及瞭

解維持房屋產權的措施。
來自:

出版編號827 n © 房地美版權所有,2016年12月
No. 58442.

protest 220849-K (New York).

#### General Motors Overseas Operations and Baker, Irons & Dock-stader, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of 2-watt carbon resistors, composed in chief value of metal, used chiefly as parts of radio apparatus, instruments, or devices, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 57933.

protest 173283-K (New York).

#### Davies Turner & Co. and Telegraph Apparatus Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of )4-, 1-, and 2-watt carbon resistors, composed in chief value of metal, used chiefly as parts of radio apparatus, instruments, or devices, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 67761.

#### Joseph Markovits, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 60/22948 (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of hemp corsages similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 63552, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
**Exhibit 14.1****CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMS**We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of Vivendi S.A.(previously known as “Vivendi Universal”) listed below of our report dated March 23, 2006 (exceptwith respect to matters discussed in Note 34, as to which the date is June 28, 2006), with respectto the consolidated financial statements of Vivendi S.A. and subsidiaries as of and for the yearsended December 31, 2005 and 2004, which report appears in Vivendi’s Annual Report on Form 20-F forthe year ended December 31, 2005, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission         **Registration****SEC Form** **Filing Date** **Number**S-8 08/11/2003 333-107837S-8 06/06/2002 333-72270S-8 06/04/2002 333-89744S-8 06/04/2002 333-89754S-8 05/06/2002 333-87622S-8 01/31/2002 333-81830S-8 10/26/2001 333-72270S-8 08/29/2001 333-64754S-8 01/04/2001 333-48966S-8 12/29/2000 333-51654S-8 12/11/2000 333-51654S-8 12/11/2000 333-48966S-8 10/05/2000 333-47440F-3/A 06/03/2002 333-81578F-3 01/29/2002 333-81578Paris La Défense and Neuilly-sur-Seine, France
Exhibit 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Annual Report of Convera Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-K/A for the period ended January 31, 2004 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Patrick C. Condo, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
    respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


By: /s/ Patrick C. Condo
   ---------------------
Patrick C. Condo
President and Chief Executive Officer
June 8, 2004
# C_2017168EN.01001501.xml

| 29.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 168/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 168/15

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 6 April 2017 — European Commission v Federal Republic of Germany

(Case C-58/16) (1)

1

((Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - Improvement of port security - Directive 2005/65/EC - Articles 2(3), 6, 7 and 9 - Infringement - No assessment of port security - Port boundaries, port security assessments and port security officers - No definition))

(2017/C 168/18)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: W. Mölls and L. Nicolae, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Federal Republic of Germany (represented by: T. Henze and R. Kanitz, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, in failing to ensure that, for the German ports of Düsseldorf, Köln-Niehl I, Godorf, Duisburg-Rheinhausen, Neuss, Duisburg Außen-/Parallelhafen, Krefeld-Linn, Stromhafen Krefeld, Duisburg Ruhrort-Meiderich, Gelsenkirchen and Mülheim, in the Land of North-Rhine-Westphalia (Germany), the boundaries of each port are defined, port security assessments and port security plans are carried out, and that port security officers are approved, the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 2(3), 6, 7 and 9 of Directive 2005/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on enhancing port security; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, in failing to ensure that, for the German ports of Düsseldorf, Köln-Niehl I, Godorf, Duisburg-Rheinhausen, Neuss, Duisburg Außen-/Parallelhafen, Krefeld-Linn, Stromhafen Krefeld, Duisburg Ruhrort-Meiderich, Gelsenkirchen and Mülheim, in the Land of North-Rhine-Westphalia (Germany), the boundaries of each port are defined, port security assessments and port security plans are carried out, and that port security officers are approved, the Federal Republic of Germany has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 2(3), 6, 7 and 9 of Directive 2005/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on enhancing port security;

| 2. | Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Federal Republic of Germany to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 118, 4.4.2016.

1

---
No. 57604.

#### Irvin I. Aaron & Associates, Inc. *v.*United States,

petition 6879-R (Milwaukee).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

The facts in this case showed that the merchandise was purchased on a c. i. f. New York basis of £14^18-0 per unit of 1,000 yards; that, after the placement of the order and prior to the first shipment of the goods, the unit c. i. f. New York price was raised by the manufacturer to £15-3-9 because of an increase in ocean freight rates; that notice of this increase apparently was not transmitted to the petitioner, the order being filled at the purchase price; that due to an error in England, the consular invoices showed the unit f. o. b. British port of exportation price of £14-5-0, based upon the price at which the merchandise was ordered, and showed the freight and shipping charges based upon the new rates; and that deduction of the higher insurance and freight charges on entry resulted in the undervaluation which caused the assessment of additional duties. On the record presented, it was held that there was no intention to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the case or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore granted.