alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Index of Records Available for Gulf West Landfill – Anahuac , TX ( RCRA - 20 10 - 1052 ) Proposed Rule 1. Sampling and Analysis Plan

Sampling and Analysis Plan for Gulf West Landfill TX LP, Chambers County , Texas , November 2008 ( Attachment B of the Delisting Petition ) Sampling and Analysi s Plan and QAPP A pproval by EPA Region 6 (PDF) ( 1pp, 168 KB), filename : Approval Dec 2008.pdf ) Sampling and Analys is Plan, Revised - June 2008 (Hard Copy ) EPA Comments on Sampling and Analysis Plan, July 2008 (PDF) (2 pp, 535 K B , filename: SAP comments 708.pdf ) 2 . Delisting Petition Delisting Petition Gulf West Landfill Leachate , December 2009 (PDF) ( 1050 pp, 12.7 M , filename: Delisting Petition Gulf West R5.pdf) 3 . Delisting Risk Assessment Software Run DRAS Run – Landfill Leachate (PDF) ( 6 pp , 50 KB, f ilename:Gulf West Landfill DRAS ) S urface Impoundment Cor r ection (PDF) ( 3 pp , 71 KB, filename: Allied SI Correction.pdf ) 4 . Delisting Risk Assessment Software Technical Support Documents (documents can be found on the internet at http://www.epa.gov/reg5r cra/wptdiv/hazardous/delisting/dras software.html ) C hapter 1: Introduction (PDF) (35pp, 260k) Chapter 2: Estimation of Chemical Releases and Media Concentrations (PDF) (47pp, 862k) Chapter 3: Exposure Scenario Selection (PDF) (14pp, 125k) Chapter 4: Quanti tative Estimation of Risk (PDF) (89pp, 1.6M) Chapter 5: Uncertainty (PDF) (9pp, 61k) Chapter 6: References (PDF) (8pp, 60K) Appendix A: Appendix with Chemical Data for Waste Constituents in DRAS (PDF) (562pp, 4M) Appendix A - 1b: Appendix with Chemical Data for Waste Constituents in DRAS (PDF) (147pp, 1M) Appendix A2: Appendix with National Primary Drinking Water Standards (PDF) (3pp, 42K) Appendix A3: Appendix with Soil Saturation Values (PDF) (7pp, 65K) Appendix A4: Target Organs and Critical Effects for Co mpounds with Reference Doses (PDF) (10pp, 187K) Appendix A5: Appendix with Default Variables: Abbreviations, Units and Values (3pp,42K )
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

AND CHIEF
FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

(18 U.S.C. 1350)

In connection with the Annual Report of Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P. (the Registrant) on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Report), the undersigned, Leo F. Wells, III, Chief Executive Officer of the corporate general partner of the Registrant, and Douglas P. Williams, Chief
Financial Officer of the corporate general partner of the Registrant, hereby certify, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. 1350), that, to the best of our knowledge and belief:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/ Leo F. Wells, III  
|Leo F. Wells, III      
|Chief Executive Officer
|March 18, 2010         



|                       
|-----------------------
|                       
|/s/ Douglas P. Williams
|Douglas P. Williams    
|Chief Financial Officer
|March 18, 2010
No. 48412.

#### Protests 959171-G, etc., of Allen-Diaz, Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 51578.

#### Protests 118028-K, etc., of Central Madeira Corp. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

: CIVIL ACTION NOS.

:

JAQUAY, et al. : 02-3882

DAUSE : 02-3928

GETTO : 02-3946

HERSH, et al. : 02-4104

DELLOLIO : 02-4141

VARMER.et al. : 02-4200

BURNS, et al. : 02-4233

SEBESTYEN, et al. : 02-4262

DIXON, et al. : 02-4325

:

VS. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION, et al. :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of July, 2002, the Court having been previously

advised that the above action cannot proceed to trial and disposition because of the following

reason:

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending disposition of a related

action.

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending determination of

arbitration proceedings.

[ ] - Interlocutory appeal filed.

[ X ] - Other: Case is placed into suspense pending receipt of the Case

Transfer Order from the Judicial Panel on Multi District Litigation

transferring case to District of Minnesota..

Case 2:02-cv-04200-CG Document 2 Filed 07/15/2002 Page 1 of 2
It is

ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this action closed for statistical purposes and

place the matter in the Civil Suspense File, and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction; and that the case be

restored to the trial docket when the action is in a status so that it may proceed to final

disposition; this order shall not prejudice the rights of the parties to this litigation.

BY THE COURT:

________________________________________

Clifford Scott Green, Judge

Case 2:02-cv-04200-CG Document 2 Filed 07/15/2002 Page 2 of 2
No. 63553.

protest 266999-K (New York).

#### Manca, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by entry 107241 consists of photographic cameras similar in all material respects to the merchandise involved in *Manca, Inc.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 271, C.D. 1874), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained. In all other respects, the protest was dismissed.
# Order Data - BIO

&"Calibri"&11&K000000NONCONFIDENTIAL // EXTERNAL&1#		

# Order Data - SFO

&"Calibri"&11&K000000NONCONFIDENTIAL // EXTERNAL&1#		

# Version

&"Calibri"&11&K000000NONCONFIDENTIAL // EXTERNAL&1#
H. Res. 965 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

July 11, 2018. 

Resolved, That at any time after adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, 

declare the House resolved into the Committee of the Whole 

House on the state of the Union for consideration of the bill 

(H.R. 200) to amend the Magnuson-Stevens Fishery Conservation and Management Act to provide flexibility for fishery managers and stability for fishermen, and for other purposes. The first reading of the bill shall be dispensed with. 

All points of order against consideration of the bill are 

waived. General debate shall be confined to the bill and shall 

not exceed one hour equally divided and controlled by the 

chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on 

Natural Resources. After general debate the bill shall be considered for amendment under the five-minute rule. It shall be 

in order to consider as an original bill for the purpose of 

amendment under the five-minute rule the amendment in the 

nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on 

Natural Resources now printed in the bill. The committee 
2 

•HRES 965 EH 

amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be considered 

as read. All points of order against the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute are waived. No amendment 

to the committee amendment in the nature of a substitute 

shall be in order except those printed in the report of the 

Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution. Each such 

amendment may be offered only in the order printed in the 

report, may be offered only by a Member designated in the 

report, shall be considered as read, shall be debatable for the 

time specified in the report equally divided and controlled by 

the proponent and an opponent, shall not be subject to 

amendment, and shall not be subject to a demand for division 

of the question in the House or in the Committee of the 

Whole. All points of order against such amendments are 

waived. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for 

amendment the Committee shall rise and report the bill to 

the House with such amendments as may have been adopted. 

Any Member may demand a separate vote in the House on 

any amendment adopted in the Committee of the Whole to 

the bill or to the committee amendment in the nature of a 

substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments thereto to final passage 
3 

•HRES 965 EH 

without intervening motion except one motion to recommit 

with or without instructions. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
No. 64777.

#### Morris Friedman et al. *v.*United States,

protests 318456-K, etc. (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Oliver, O. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of fiber or hemp articles similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 63552, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
# C_2015354EN.01004901.xml

| 26.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 354/49 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 354/49

---

Action brought on 7 September 2015 — Gruppe Nymphenburg Consult v OHIM (Limbic® Sales)

®

(Case T-517/15)

(2015/C 354/60)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Gruppe Nymphenburg Consult AG (Munich, Germany) (represented by: R. Kunze und G. Würtenberger, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘Limbic® Sales’ — Application for registration No 12 316 493

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 23 June 2015 in Case R 1972/2014-1

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision concerning the application for registration of the Community trade mark 012 316 493 Limbic® Sales; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision concerning the application for registration of the Community trade mark 012 316 493 Limbic® Sales;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 63, the first sentence of Article 75 and of Article 76 of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 63, the first sentence of Article 75 and of Article 76 of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
EXHIBIT 23.2 - CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


Heritage Financial Holding Corporation
Decatur, Alabama


     We  hereby  consent  to  the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement  No.  333-55942  on  Form  S-8  of our report dated February 25, 2003,
relating  to  the  2002  consolidated financial statements of Heritage Financial
Holding  Corporation and subsidiaries appearing in and incorporated by reference
in  the  Company's  Annual  Report  on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2002.


                               /S/ Schauer Taylor Cox Vise Morgan & Fowler, P.C.


Birmingham, Alabama
March  30,  2004


<PAGE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [Investigation No. 731-TA-921 (Fourth Review)]

                    On the basis of the record [1]                                          developed in the subject five-year review, the United States International Trade Commission (“Commission”) determines, pursuant to the Tariff Act of 1930 (“the Act”), that revocation of the antidumping duty order on folding gift boxes from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.                

## Background

The Commission instituted this review on June 1, 2023 (88 FR 35917) and determined on September 5, 2023, that it would conduct an expedited review (88 FR 67813, October 2, 2023).

                    The Commission made this determination pursuant to section 751(c) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)). It completed and filed its determination in this review on November 3, 2023. The views of the Commission are contained in USITC Publication 5471 (November 2023), entitled                     *Folding Gift Boxes from China: Investigation No. 731-TA-921 (Fourth Review).*

By order of the Commission.

Issued: November 3, 2023.

Lisa Barton,

Secretary to the Commission.

# Footnotes

1.                             The record is defined in § 207.2(f) of the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 207.2(f)).                    
        Back to Citation      

[FR Doc. 2023-24703 Filed 11-7-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
# C_2017309EN.01000801.xml

| 18.9.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 309/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.9.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 309/8

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 26 July 2017 — Continental Reifen Deutschland GmbH v Compagnie générale des établissements Michelin and European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

(Case C-84/16 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - EU trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 8(1)(b) - Figurative mark including the word element ‘XKING’ - Opposition by the proprietor of national marks and an international registration including the word element ‘X’ - Rejection of opposition by the Board of Appeal - Likelihood of confusion - Distortion of the evidence))

(2017/C 309/10)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Continental Reifen Deutschland GmbH (represented by: S.O. Gillert, K. Vanden Bossche, B. Köhn-Gerdes and J. Schumacher, Rechtsanwälte)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Compagnie générale des établissements Michelin (represented by: E. Carrillo, abogada), European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: M. Fischer, Agent)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Continental Reifen Deutschland GmbH to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Compagnie générale des établissements Michelin; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Continental Reifen Deutschland GmbH to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Compagnie générale des établissements Michelin;

| 3. | Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 211, 13.6.2016.

1

---
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 83 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on Ethics in the 

One Hundred Fifteenth Congress. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

FEBRUARY 2, 2017 

Mrs. BROOKS of Indiana (for herself and Mr. DEUTCH) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration 

RESOLUTION 

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Committee on 

Ethics in the One Hundred Fifteenth Congress. 

1 Resolved, 

2 SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES. 

3 For the expenses of the Committee on Ethics (here4 after in this resolution referred to as the ‘‘Committee’’), 

5 including the expenses of all staff salaries, there shall be 

6 paid, out of the applicable accounts of the House of Rep7 resentatives for committee salaries and expenses, not more 

8 than $6,201,326 for the One Hundred Fifteenth Con9 gress. 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 83 IH 

1 SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS. 

2 Of the amount specified in section 1— 

3 (1) not more than $3,100,663 shall be available 

4 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

5 noon on January 3, 2017, and ending immediately 

6 before noon on January 3, 2018; and 

7 (2) not more than $3,100,663 shall be available 

8 for expenses incurred during the period beginning at 

9 noon on January 3, 2018, and ending immediately 

10 before noon on January 3, 2019. 

11 SEC. 3. VOUCHERS. 

12 Payments under this resolution shall be made on 

13 vouchers authorized by the Committee, signed by the 

14 Chairman of the Committee, and approved in the manner 

15 directed by the Committee on House Administration. 

16 SEC. 4. REGULATIONS. 

17 Amounts made available under this resolution shall 

18 be expended in accordance with regulations prescribed by 

19 the Committee on House Administration. 

Æ 


SSpencer on DSK4SPTVN1PROD with BILLS
No. 59968.

#### W. X. Huber Co. *v.*United States,

protests 692230-G and 692231-G (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that 20 percent of the merchandise consists of rags used chiefly for papermaking, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained with respect to said 20 percent of the merchandise.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dragon International Group Corp. on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, David Wu, Chief Executive Officer of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

November 14, 2006

 

By:/s/ David Wu                          

David Wu, CEO
No. 57593.

#### Hugo Neu Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 201431-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

At the trial, it was orally stipulated that the merchandise was imported and entered for consumption on August 25, 1950; that *285the entry was liquidated on September 30, 1952; and that the merchandise consists of brass drums from which the heads had been cut out prior to importation. In the amended memorandum of the collector, received in evidence as exhibit 1, it is stated that the merchandise is properly classifiable as free of duty under paragraph 1634 and, under Public Law 869, is not subject to internal revenue tax. On the record presented, it was held that the merchandise is entitled to entry free of internal revenue tax or duty as metal scrap, fit only to be remanufactured, under said Public Law 869.
No. 66731.

#### T.A.P. Equipment Co., dba Thrifty Equipment Co., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 61/16391-S, etc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Eord, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of D-2, D-4, and IID-5 tractors similar in all material respects to the tractor parts the subject of Abstract 63560, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MAUREEN SADEIK :

: CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-CV-4129

Plaintiff, :

:

v. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION;

BAYER AG;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE;

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM

:

:

:

:

:

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

:

Defendants. :

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of the Court:

Kindly enter the appearances of Hope S. Freiwald, Aline Fairweather, Erin

Brennan and Kirstin J. Miller as attorneys for defendant GlaxoSmithKline PLC.

Respectfully Submitted,

_____________________________ _____________________________

Hope S. Freiwald Aline Fairweather

_____________________________ _____________________________

Erin Brennan Kirstin J. Miller

DECHERT PRICE & RHOADS

4000 Bell Atlantic Tower

1717 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2793

(215) 994-4000

Case 2:02-cv-04129-CMR Document 6 Filed 09/11/2002 Page 1 of 1
# Materials Not Included in Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA - 2016 - 5039 Directorate Identifier: 2013NM148AD

A300 - 54 - 6014, R06 --- 5/24/12 A300 - 54 - 6014, R05 --- 9/1/11 A300 - 54 - 6014, R04 --- 7//9/02 A300 - 54 - 6014, R03 --- 6/4/98 A300 - 54 - 0073, R02 --- 7/9/02 A310 - 54 - 2017, R05 --- 11/16/07 A310 - 54 - 2017, R04 --- 7/9/12 A300 - 54 - 0080, R02 --- 7/9/02 A300 - 54 - 6020, R02 --- 7/9/02 A310 - 54 - 2023, R03 --- 7/9/02

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the Supplemental AD Docket 

### MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration Transport Airplane Directorate Rules Docket 1601 Lind Ave. SW., Renton, WA 98057 425.227.1221 DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday, except Federal holidays. Form Date: 03/05/2008
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of China Nuvo Solar Energy, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended July 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas G Toland, Principal Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company, as of, and for the periods presented in the Report.


| |                            
| | ---------------------------
| | /s/ Thomas G Toland        
| | Thomas G Toland            
| | Principal Executive Officer
| | November 14, 2011          

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to China Nuvo Solar Energy, Inc. and will be retained by China Nuvo Solar Energy, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.