alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.01


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Montgomery Realty Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended June 30, 2005, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Dinesh
Maniar, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



/s/ Dinesh Maniar
-------------------------
Dinesh Maniar
Chief Executive Officer
May 3, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-14-00568-CR

Mark Anthony Green

v.

The State of Texas

On Appeal from the

24th District Court of Victoria County, Texas

Trial Cause No. 88-7-13,248-3

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal 

DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION in accordance with its opinion.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

October 30, 2014
No. 62992.

#### China Dry Goods Co. and Frank P. Dow Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 289858-K, etc. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of iron pictures the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Marshall Field Co.*v. *United States*(45 C.C.P.A. 72, C.A.D. 676), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
COURT OF APPEALS

EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

EL PASO, TEXAS

JAMES ARTHUR WELLS,

Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee.

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-23-00098-CR

Appeal from the

104th Judicial District Court

of Taylor County, Texas

(TC# CR23133-B)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was error in the 

judgment. We therefore modify the trial court’s Judgment of Conviction for the aggravated assault 

to delete the imposition of $100 fine, the $260 reimbursement fee, and the $290 court costs. We 

otherwise affirm the judgment as modified. We affirm the Judgment of Conviction for the 

intoxication manslaughter, including the assessment of the reimbursement fee and court costs. This 

decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 19TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2023.

JEFF ALLEY, Chief Justice

Before Alley, C.J., Palafox, and Soto, JJ.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

April 25, 2011 

h0418 

Order 

 

April 25, 2011 

142223 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 142223 

 COA: 294436 

Oakland CC: 2008-220963-FC 

ANTHONY LACALAMITA, 

Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 19, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

 ) Criminal Action

Plaintiff ) No. 03-cr-00538-2

 )

vs. ) Civil Action 

 ) No. 07-cv-2862

HOLLY WILLIAMS, )

 )

Defendant )

O R D E R

NOW, this 30th day of June, 2009, upon consideration of

the Government’s Motion for Leave to File Responses Two Days Out

of Time, which motion was filed September 17, 2008; upon

consideration of the pro se Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or

Correct Sentence filed July 12, 2007 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255

by defendant Holly Williams; upon consideration of defendant’s

letter request dated February 10, 2008 requesting appointment of

counsel for purposes of her § 2255 motion, together with

defendant’s Brief in Support of Request for Appointment of

Counsel, which brief was filed August 21, 2008; it appearing that

on September 17, 2008, the Government’s Response to Motions for

Appointment of Counsel and for Relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 was

filed; and for the reasons expressed in the accompanying Opinion,

IT IS ORDERED that the Government’s Motion for Leave to

File Responses Two Days Out of Time is granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Government’s Response to

Motions for Appointment of Counsel and for Relief under 28 U.S.C.

§ 2255 is deemed timely filed.

Case 2:03-cr-00538-JKG Document 164 Filed 07/15/09 Page 1 of 2
-iiIT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant’s pro se Motion to

Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence is denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant’s request for

appointment of counsel is denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of

appealability is denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall

mark this case closed for statistical purposes.

BY THE COURT:

 /s/ James Knoll Gardner 

James Knoll Gardner

United States District Judge

Case 2:03-cr-00538-JKG Document 164 Filed 07/15/09 Page 2 of 2
No. 54554.

#### Arrathoon Trading Company *v.*United States,

protest 155150-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

An examination of the record disclosing nothing that would warrant the court in disturbing the finding of the collector, which was presumptively correct, the protest was overruled.
Third District Court of Appeal

State of Florida

Opinion filed November 24, 2021.

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-1189

Lower Tribunal No. 18-15508 CC

________________

City of Miami,

Appellant,

vs.

United Automobile Insurance Company,

Appellee.

An appeal from a non-final order from the County Court for Miami-Dade 

County, Myriam Lehr, Judge.

Victoria Méndez, City Attorney, and Eric J. Eves, Assistant City 

Attorney, for appellant.

Law Offices of Gary Kornfield, P.A., and Gary Kornfield (Hollywood), 

for appellee.

Before SCALES, HENDON, and MILLER, JJ. 

PER CURIAM.
2

Affirmed. See § 627.7405(1), Fla. Stat. (2021); Lee Cnty. Sch. Bd. v. 

State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 276 So. 3d 352, 356 (Fla. 2d DCA 2019).
# April 2023
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

REGIONAL EMPLOYERS' ASSURANCE 

LEAGUES VOLUNTARY EMPLOYEES' 

BENEFICIARY ASSOCATION TRUST, 

Plaintiff, 

v. 

GRETCHEN HUTTO CASTELLANO, , 

Defendant. 

v. 

JEFFERSON PILOT FINANCIAL 

INSURANCE COMPANY 

Movant 

HILDA L. SOLIS 

Interested Party 

GRETCHEN HUTTO CASTELLANO 

Counter Claimant 

REGIONAL EMPLOYERS' ASSURANCE 

LEAGUES VOLUNTARY EMPLOYEES 

BENEFICIARY ASSOCIATION TRUST, 

BY PENNMONT BENEFIT SERVICES, 

INC., PLAN ADMINISTRATOR, 

LA WREN CE KORESKO, JEANNE D. 

BONNEY, JOHN J. KORESKO, V., 

KORESKO FINANCIAL L.P., KORESKO 

& ASSOCIATES, P.C., and PENN-MONT 

BENEFIT SERVICES, INC. 

Counter Defendants 

ORDER 

CIVIL ACTION 

NO. 03-6903 

FILED 

NOV 2 1 2017 

KAT:r:: By ,_ -----~'-" ........ ,._,, 

AND NOW, this 21st day of November, 2017, upon consideration of the Report and 

Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Elizabeth Hey regarding Defendant and Counter Claimant 

Gretchen Hutto Castellano's ("Castellano") motion for attorney's fees (ECF No. 367), 

Castellano's Objections thereto (ECF No. 373, 378 and 382) and non-party, the Department of 

Labor's ("the DOL") partial objections thereto (ECF No. 376), it is HEREBY ORDERED that: 
1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED AND ADOPTED. 

2. The Objections of Castellano and the DOL are OVERRULED. 

3. Counsel for Castellano is AW ARD ED $567 ,400.26 which shall be paid from the funds 

of the SEWBPT and REAL VEBA Trust ("the Trust") to be restored by the Koresko 

Defendants. 

4. Wilmington Trust is ORDERED to pay said counsel fees from the Trust. 

WENDY BEETLESTONE, J. 

2
Exhibit 99.2

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Blue Industries, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Valerie Thierstein, the principal financial officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13
                  (a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

           /s/ Valerie Thierstein
Valerie Thierstein, Chief Financial Officer
May 1, 2003
No. 55144.

#### Aris Gloves, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 984475-G, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

The protests were dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Waste Industries USA, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended
December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods
presented in the Report.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ D. Stephen GrissomChief Financial OfficerMarch 16, 2006
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

WM HIGH YIELD FUND, et al. : CIVIL ACTION 

:

v. :

: No. 04-3423

MICHAEL A. O’HANLON, et al. :

ORDER 

AND NOW, this 27th day of June, 2013, upon consideration of the parties’ submissions,1

it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant Matthew Colasanti’s Motion for Summary Judgment

(Doc. No. 259) is GRANTED, and it is further ORDERED that JUDGMENT is entered in favor

of Defendant Colasanti and against Plaintiffs – WM High Yield Fund; WM Income Fund; WM

VT Income Fund; AT High Yield Fund; AT Income Fund; and Stellar Funding, Ltd. – on all

claims contained in the Complaint. 

BY THE COURT: 

/s/ Legrome D. Davis

Legrome D. Davis, J. 

Defendant Matthew Colasanti’s submissions: Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 259),

1

Statement of Material Facts as to Which There Is No Genuine Dispute (Doc. No. 259 at 4-9), Memorandum

of Law (Doc. No. 259 at 10-36), Declaration of Michael Viano, Jr. (Doc. No. 259-1) with Exhibits (Doc.

Nos. 259-2 through 259-11). Plaintiffs did not respond to the motion for summary judgment.
Before the Third Division,

March 19, 1953

No. 57181.

protest 118477-K (Detroit).

#### Universal Importing Agency *v.*United States,

*389Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of shredded coconut meat in sirup, a product of Cuba, similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Allied Food Corporation of America*v. *United States*(28 Cust. Ct. 222, C. D. 1412), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS, CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AND
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE TWENTY-SIX WEEKS
ENDED AUGUST 2, 1998.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             FEB-02-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-02-1998
<CASH>                                           7,578
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   41,420
<ALLOWANCES>                                     2,433
<INVENTORY>                                    368,534
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               440,754
<PP&E>                                         180,395
<DEPRECIATION>                                (89,985)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 570,344
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          189,794
<BONDS>                                         81,250
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           277
<OTHER-SE>                                      85,448
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   570,344
<SALES>                                        493,124
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               439,124
<CGS>                                          267,746
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  462,909
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              16,608
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 13,607
<INCOME-TAX>                                     5,017
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              8,590
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                (6,767)
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     1,823
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.07
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.07
        

</TABLE>
No. 50848.

#### Protests 5673-K, etc., of Ernest Hirsch (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise consist of cheese similar in all material respects to that the subject of Abstract 48269. In accordance therewith it was held that an allowance of 2)4 percent should have been made in the weight of the cheese by the collector in computing the duty thereon to compensate for the weight of the inedible coverings on the outside of the cheese. The protests were sustained to this extent, ■ ■
1

Sutton, Lisa

From: Maietta, Anthony

Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 4:32 PM

To: Brachtl, Megan; Sutton, Lisa

Cc: Portanova, Mary; Blakley, Pamela

Subject: FW: Indiana: Final SIP Call: Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction 

Attachments: McCabe letter to air directors final SSM SIP call 05-22-15.pdf

Anthony Maietta

EPA Region 5

maietta.anthony@epa.gov

(312) 353‐8777

From: Czerniak, George  

Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 3:30 PM

To: Portanova, Mary; Maietta, Anthony

Subject: FW: Indiana: Final SIP Call: Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction  

From: Czerniak, George  

Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 1:19 PM

To: 'kBaugues@idem.in.gov'

Subject: Indiana: Final SIP Call: Startup, Shutdown, Malfunction  

Keith:

This message is a follow‐up to my recent phone call notifying you about the final action the EPA Administrator signed

today to ensure States have in place air pollution rules that apply to sources at all times, including when the source is

operating during periods of startup, shutdown, or malfunction (SSM).  

This action responds to a Petition for Rulemaking filed by the Sierra Club and WildEarth Guardians concerning the

treatment of excess emissions at industrial facilities during SSM operations, specifically how those emissions are

treated in State Implementation Plan (SIP) provisions that the EPA previously approved. Also, as part of this action,

EPA has revised and clarified its policy concerning SSM provisions consistent with the Clean Air Act.

The EPA is calling for 36 States, including Indiana, to make changes to their SIPs, to protect public health and ensure

consistency with the Clean Air Act and the EPA’s current SSM Policy.  You will have 18 months to submit revisions of

your State plan to EPA. Your revised SIP is due to EPA by November 22, 2016.  

As part of our notification to your State about this final SIP call, I have attached to this email a letter from the EPA’s

Acting Assistant Administrator for Air and Radiation, Janet McCabe. To inform you of the details on the final action,

including the specific SIP provisions your State needs to address, we have posted a pre‐publication version of the

action on our website at:  http://www.epa.gov/airquality/urbanair/sipstatus/emissions.html.  

The EPA will continue to work closely with you to ensure the SIP revision process is as efficient as possible.  If you or

your staff have questions, please contact Mary Portanova, portanova.mary@epa.gov, (312) 353‐5954.
2

George  

Attachment
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 20-3336

___________________________

Earl Lee Hall, Jr.

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Tracy Taylor, Deputy, Dub Brassell Detention Center

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee

 ____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Pine Bluff

 ____________

 Submitted: March 18, 2021

Filed: March 23, 2021

[Unpublished]

____________

Before GRUENDER, WOLLMAN, and GRASZ, Circuit Judges. 

____________

PER CURIAM.

Earl Lee Hall, Jr., appeals the district court’s adverse judgment following a

bench trial in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action.1

 Having reviewed the record, we conclude

1The Honorable Beth Deere, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern

District of Arkansas, to whom the case was referred for final disposition by consent

of the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c).
the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying Hall’s motions for

appointment of counsel, see Patterson v. Kelley, 902 F.3d 845, 849-50 (8th Cir. 2018)

(standard of review), or in addressing Hall’s requests for discovery, see Robinson v.

Potter, 453 F.3d 990, 994-95 (8th Cir. 2006) (standard of review). Because Hall has

failed to provide a transcript of the trial proceedings, this court cannot meaningfully

review his challenge to the district court’s judgment. See Fed. R. App. P. 10(b)

(discussing the appellant’s duty to order transcripts); Van Treese v. Blome, 7 F.3d

729, 729 (8th Cir. 1993) (per curiam) (explaining that the district court’s factual

findings or evidence presented at trial could not be reviewed without a transcript);

Schmid v. United Bhd. of Carpenters & Joiners of Am., 827 F.2d 384, 386 (8th Cir.

1987) (per curiam) (explaining that, without a trial transcript, this court could not rule

on the weight of the evidence). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is

affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. 

______________________________

-2-
Case 2:03-cr-00487-JP Document 611 Filed 08/12/09 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 


WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 


JUL '" 5 2011 U~~ 

t".;,iR AJ'>lC Rf"DIAri( 1<1 

Mr. David R. Tripp 

Stinson Morrison Hecker, LLP 

1201 Walnut Street, Suite 2900 

Kansas City, Missouri 64106-2150 

Dear Mr. Tripp: 

Thank you for your letter ofJune 10,2011, requesting an extension ofthe public comment 

period for the proposed "National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Coaland Oil-fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units and Standards of Performance for FossilFuel-Fired Electric Utility, Industrial-Commercial-Institutional, and Small IndustrialCommercial-Institutional Steam Generating Units" (the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards rule), 

which was published in the Federal Register on May 3, 2011. The proposal identified a public 

comment period of60 days; that period would have ended on July 5,2011. The U.S. 

Environmental Protection Agency, however, recently announced an extension ofthe comment 

period by 30 days to August 4. 

While we are extending the comment period, we are not seeking to extend the November 16, 

2011, deadline for signature ofthe final rule, and remain committed to meeting that deadline. 

The 30-day extension will provide the public with a 140-day period to review the proposal. As 

you know, interested parties were aware ofthe posting on March 16,2011, ofthe signed 

proposal on the EPA's website (http://www.epa.gov/ttnlatw/utilitylutilitypg.html), along with 

much ofthe pertinent supporting documentation (including the analyses used in establishing the 

proposed emission limits and the technical support documents). The proposal was published a 

little over six weeks later, on May 3, marking the beginning ofthe formal public comment 

period. This will provide the public with approximately 140 days to review and provide written 

comments on the proposed rule and supporting documents. It will also provide at least 60 days 

for other documentation that was not posted on the website until after the proposed rule was 

signed. Due to the substantive issues specific to this rulemaking , this comment period is 

significantly longer than statutorily required. 

Internet Address (URL) • htlp.ilwww.epa.gov 


Recycled/Recyclable' Pnnted w,th Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100%, Postconsurr-er. Process Chlorine F'ee'Recycled Pape' 

Again, thank you for your letter. We look forward to the timely receipt of your comments. 

Si~erely, 

l~~~ .-:-'----, --7Jvi/W~ '~na McCarthy 

Assistant Administrator
No. 50882.

#### Protest 117917-K of Hercules Liquor Products Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

An examination of the papers disclosed that the protest was filed 61 days after liquidation. As the protest was not filed within the time prescribed by law under section 514, Tariff Act of 1930, the motion to dismiss was granted.