alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Federal Housing Finance Agency

Debra Chew – Deputy Director 

Office of Equal Opportunity and Fairness and

Office of Minority and Women Inclusion

Debra Chew joined FHFA in September 2020 to lead the Office of Equal 

Opportunity and Fairness (OEOF) and became Deputy Director of the Office of 

Minority and Women Inclusion (OMWI) in March 2024.

OEOF was created in January 2020 to elevate the importance of Equal 

Employment Opportunity (EEO), Alternative Dispute Resolution, and antiharassment functions within FHFA and reaffirm FHFA's commitment to a 

workplace free of harassment and discrimination. OMWI oversees all diversity, 

equity, inclusion, and accessibility activities for the agency in management, 

employment and business activities as well as diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) regulation and 

supervision of FHFA’s regulated entities – both the Enterprises (Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac) and the 

Federal Home Loan Banks (FHLBanks).

Chew, a 25-year veteran practitioner in EEO, diversity, and civil rights, came to FHFA from the National 

Institutes of Health (NIH) where she served as the Director for the Office of Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion 

since 2012. Prior to NIH, Chew served as the Chief Human Capital Officer for the Internal Revenue service 

and led a staff of 1,600 human capital professionals across the country. She held a similar diversity, equity, 

inclusion, and accessibility-focused leadership position at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the 

Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). Prior to FDA, she served as a senior staff attorney at the Department 

of Health and Human Services, Office of the General Counsel, Business and Administrative Law Division 

where she litigated EEO complaints with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and personnel 

litigation before the Merit Systems Protections Board. While at the FDA, Chew was awarded the Health and 

Human Services Award for Excellence in Management, the highest award for leadership at the Department. 

She is a licensed attorney who practiced in the areas of employment discrimination and medical malpractice 

defense both for governmental and private entities. Chew graduated from the University of Virginia and 

received her law degree from American University, Washington College of Law.
No. 49952.

#### Protests 36218-K, etc., of F. S. Choyke et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that the cheese is similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Scaramelli*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706), and Abstracts 42146 and 48269, which records were incorporated herein. In accordance with stipulation and on the authority of the decisions cited the court held that an allowance of 2}4 percent should have been made in the weight of the cheese by the collector in computing the duty thereon to compensate for the weight of the inedible coverings on the outside of the cheese. The protests were sustained to this extent.
Federal Register / Vol. 63, No. 162 / Friday, August 21, 1998 / Proposed Rules 44991 

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY 

Fiscal Service 

31 CFR Part 285 

RIN 1510–AA64 

Offset of Federal Benefit Payments to 

Collect Past-due, Legally Enforceable 

Nontax Debt 

AGENCY: Financial Management Service, 

Fiscal Service, Treasury. 

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking 

by cross-reference to interim 

regulations. 

SUMMARY: In the rules and regulations 

portion of this Federal Register, the 

Financial Management Service is 

issuing an interim rule setting forth the 

rules governing the administrative offset 

of Federal benefit payments issued 

under the Social Security Act (other 

than Supplemental Security Income), 

part B of the Black Lung Benefits Act, 

and any law administered by the 

Railroad Retirement Board (other than 

tier 2 benefit payments). The Debt 

Collection Improvement Act of 1996 

requires the Federal Government to 

withhold or reduce certain Federal 

payments to satisfy delinquent nontax 

debts owed to the United States by the 

payee. This process is known as 

‘‘administrative offset.’’ The interim rule 

also serves as the text of this notice of 

proposed rulemaking. 

DATES: Comments will be accepted until 

September 21, 1998. 

ADDRESSES: All comments should be 

addressed to Gerry Isenberg, Financial 

Program Specialist, Debt Management 

Services, Financial Management 

Service, Department of the Treasury, 

401 14th Street SW, Room 151, 

Washington, DC 20227. A copy of this 

notice of proposed rulemaking is being 

made available for downloading from 

the Financial Management Service web 

site at the following address: http:// 

www.fms.treas.gov/debt/dms.html. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Gerry Isenberg, Financial Program 

Specialist, at (202) 874–6660; Ellen 

Neubauer or Ronda Kent, Senior 

Attorneys, at (202) 874–6680. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The 

interim rule in this issue of the Federal 

Register establishes 31 CFR 285.4. For 

the text of the interim rule, see Offset of 

Federal benefit payments to collect pastdue, legally enforceable nontax debt, 

Interim rule, published in the rules and 

regulations section of this issue of the 

Federal Register. 

Regulatory Analyses 

This proposed rule is not a significant 

regulatory action as defined in 

Executive Order 12866. It is hereby 

certified that this proposed rule will not 

have a significant economic impact on 

a substantial number of small entities. 

The basis for this certification is that 

this proposed rule only impacts 

individuals who owe delinquent debt to 

the United States and receive the benefit 

payments discussed above. Therefore, a 

regulatory flexibility analysis is not 

required. 

List of Subjects in 31 CFR Part 285 

Administrative practice and 

procedures, Black lung benefits, Claims, 

Debts, Disability benefits, Railroad 

retirement, Railroad unemployment 

insurance, Social Security benefits, 

Supplemental Security Income (SSI), 

Veterans benefits. 

Dated: August 13, 1998. 

Richard L. Gregg, 

Commissioner. 

[FR Doc. 98–22395 Filed 8–20–98; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4810–35–P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

REGIONAL EMPLOYERS ASSURANCE : CIVIL ACTION

LEAGUES VOLUNTARY EMPLOYEES’ :

BENEFICIARY ASSOCIATION TRUST :

:

v. :

:

GRETCHEN CASTELLANO :

:

v. :

:

REGIONAL EMPLOYERS ASSURANCE :

LEAGUES VOLUNTARY EMPLOYEES’ :

BENEFICIARY ASSOCIATION TRUST :

BY PENN-MONT BENEFIT SERVICES,:

INC., PLAN ADMINISTRATOR, :

et al. : NO. 03-6903

ORDER

AND NOW, this 24th day of August, 2015, upon

consideration of the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment

(Docket #127) and counterclaimant Castellano’s response;

counterclaimant Castellano’s motion for summary judgment (Docket

#125), plaintiff’s response and the reply thereto;

counterclaimant Castellano’s supplemental motion for summary

judgment (Docket #249), plaintiff’s response and the reply

thereto; and counterclaimant Castellano’s motion to amend

counterclaim (Docket #251) and plaintiff’s response; and for

reasons stated in a memorandum bearing today’s date, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED that the Court will deny the plaintiff’s motion for

summary judgment and grant counterclaimant Castellano’s motion

for summary judgment on the declaratory judgment action. 

Case 2:03-cv-06903-WB Document 352 Filed 08/25/15 Page 1 of 2
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counterclaimant Castellano’s

motion for summary judgment for relief under § 502(a)(1)(B) of

ERISA is GRANTED. Castellano is hereby awarded benefits in the

amount of $750,000.00. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the REAL VEBA

trust shall pay this amount to Castellano. 

IT IS ALSO ORDERED that counterclaimant Castellano’s

motion to amend the counterclaim is GRANTED. In all other

respects, Castellano’s motion for summary judgment is DENIED. 

The motion for summary judgment on the equitable ERISA claim is

DENIED without prejudice and the motion is DENIED with prejudice

with respect to the common law counterclaims and the civil RICO

claims.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Mary A. McLaughlin

MARY A. McLAUGHLIN, J.

Case 2:03-cv-06903-WB Document 352 Filed 08/25/15 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA :

: CRIMINAL ACTION

v. :

: No. 04-333-1

:

STEVEN HIGHT :

ORDER 

AND NOW, this 22nd day of September 2020, upon consideration of Defendant’s Motion 

For Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c), the Government’s response, and for the 

reasons provided in this Court’s Memorandum dated September 22, 2020, it is ORDERED that:

1. The motion (Document No. 111) is DENIED.

2. Defendant’s initial compassionate release motion (Document No. 107) is DENIED as 

moot.

3. Defendant’s request seeking imposition of fine deferred (Document No. 113) is 

DENIED. 

4. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the United States shall respond to Defendant’s 

outstanding Motions to Vacate/ Set Aside/ Correct Sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 

(Document Nos. 99 and 103) no later than Friday, October 9, 2020.

BY THE COURT:

__/s/ Berle M. Schiller_____________

Berle M. Schiller, J.

Case 2:04-cr-00333-BMS Document 120 Filed 09/23/20 Page 1 of 1
No. 67765.

#### W. G. Carroll *v.*United States,

protests 62/18786, 62/19327, and 63/540 (Savannah).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *Falcon Sales Company*and *J. J. Murphy & Co.*v. *United States*(47 Cust. Ct. 129, C.D. 2292), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                   AS ADDED BY
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Torpedo Sports USA, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the year ended July 31, 2003  I, Henry Fong, Chief
Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbarnes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Torpedo Sports, USA, Inc. for the
         year ended July 31, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of
         section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of
         Torpedo Sports USA, Inc. for the year ended July 31, 2003, fairly
         presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result
         of operations of the Torpedo Sports USA, Inc.



/s/ Henry Fong
-----------------------
Henry Fong
Chief Executive Officer
December 29, 2003

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In connection with the Annual Report of Torpedo Sports USA, Inc. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the year ended July 31, 2003  I, Barry S. Hollander, Chief
Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbarnes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Torpedo Sports, USA, Inc. for the
         year ended July 31, 2003, fully complies with the requirements of
         section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      the information contained in such Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of
         Torpedo Sports USA, Inc. for the year ended July 31, 2003, fairly
         presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result
         of operations of the Torpedo Sports USA, Inc.



/s/ Barry S. Hollander
-----------------------
Barry S. Hollander
Chief Financial Officer
December 29, 2003
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Spectra Energy Capital, LLC on Form 10-Q for the period
ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Sabra L. Harrington, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Controller of Spectra Energy Capital LLC, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Spectra Energy Capital, LLC.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|                        |  |                                                                           
|----------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 14, 2007 |  | /s/ Sabra L. Harrington                                                   
|                        |  | Sabra L. Harrington Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Controller
|
# C_2018104EN.01001001.xml

| 19.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 104/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

19.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 104/10

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 24 January 2018 — European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) v European Food SA, Société des produits Nestlé SA

(Case C-634/16 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - Word mark FITNESS - Dismissal of the application for a declaration of invalidity))

(2018/C 104/11)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: M. Rajh, acting as Agent)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: European Food SA (represented by: I. Speciac, avocat), Société des produits Nestlé SA (represented by: A. Jaeger-Lenz and S. Cobet-Nüse, Rechtsanwältinnen and by A. Lambrecht, Rechtsanwalt)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 86, 20.3.2017.

1

---
Ex. 99.2 a)

Cendant Mortgage
3000 Leadenhall Road
Mount Laurel, NJ 08054

Ladies and Gentlemen:

As of and for the year ended December 31, 2003, Cendant Mortgage Corporation
(the Company) has complied in all material respects with the minimum servicing
standards set forth in the Mortgage Bankers Association of Americas Uniform
Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers. As of and for this same period,
the Company had in effect a fidelity bond and errors and omissions policy in the
amount of $140 million and $20 million, respectively.

Cendant Mortgage Corporation

/s/ Terence W. Edwards
-----------------------
Terence W. Edwards
President and Chief Executive Officer

/s/ Mark Danahy
---------------
Mark Danahy
Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer

/s/ Martin L. Foster
--------------------
Martin L. Foster
Senior Vice President Loan Servicing
# C_2018328EN.01000501.xml

| 17.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 328/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 328/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 25 July 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Varhoven administrativen sad — Bulgaria) — ‘TTL’ EOOD v Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika’ — Sofia

(Case C-553/16) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Freedom to provide services - Corporate taxation - Payments made by a company resident in a Member State to non-resident companies for the leasing of rail tankers - Obligation to charge withholding tax on income from a domestic source paid to a non-resident company - Non-compliance - Double taxation conventions - Charging the resident company default interest for non-payment of the withholding tax - Interest payable from the expiry of the statutory time limit for payment until the date on which evidence that the double taxation convention is applicable is furnished - Irrecoverable interest))

(2018/C 328/06)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Varhoven administrativen sad

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant:‘TTL’ EOOD

Respondent: Direktor na Direktsia ‘Obzhalvane i danachno-osiguritelna praktika’ — Sofia

Intervener: Varhovna administrativna prokuratura

Operative part of the judgment

Article 56 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding legislation of a Member State, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, whereby the payment of income by a resident company to a company established in another Member State is, in principle, subject to withholding tax, except where otherwise provided in the double taxation convention entered into between those two Member States, if that legislation requires the resident company, which neither deducts nor pays that sum to the tax authorities of the first Member State, to pay irrecoverable default interest for the period from the expiry of the time limit for payment of the income tax up to the date on which the non-resident company proves that the requirements for the application of the double taxation convention have been fulfilled, even though, in accordance with that convention, the non-resident company is not liable to pay any tax in the first Member State or the amount thereof is lower than that normally payable under the tax law of that Member State.

---

(1)  OJ C 22, 23.1.2017.

---
Case No. 13,067.

#### SMITH et al. v. JOHNSON.

[2 Cranch, C. C. 645.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

April Term, 1826.

Notes — Place of Payment — Demand—Payment.

1. In action against the maker of a promissory note, payable at a particular bank, it is not necessary to aver or prove a demand of payment at that bank.

2. A promissory note, given as collateral or counter security for a note borrowed, is not discharged or vacated by the borrower’s, discharging or taking up the borrowed note with funds furnished by the lender.

[See Case No. 13,061.]

Debt against the maker of a promissory note for $5,000, dated January 8th, 1824, payable to and indorsed by Jacob Hoffman to the plaintiffs [Walter and Clement Smith], and given by Hoffman to them as a collateral guaranty to secure them against their note for the like amount, dated January 9th, 1824, lent to Hoffman for the use of the defendant [George .Johnson] and Hoffman in a business in which they were jointly concerned. The note was made payable at the Fanners’ and Mechanics’ Bank in Georgetown, and the declaration avers a demand at that bank.

Mr. Jones and Mr. Taylor, for defendant,

prayed the court to instruct the jury, that they must be satisfied that payment of the note was demanded at the said bank before the plaintiffs can recover in this action. Howe v. Young, 2 Brod. & B. 165; Chit. Bills, 321.

Mr. Key, contra,

cited the case of Rhodes v. Gent, 5 Bam. & Aid. 244; 7 Serg. & R. 84; Foden v. Sharp, 4 Johns. 183; Wolcott v. Vantvoord, 17 Johns, 248; 3 Chit. PI. 4; But-terworth v. Le Despencer, 3 Maulé & S. 150; Pearse v. Pemberthy, 3 Camp. 261.

THE COURT

fnem. eon.) refused to give the instruction; considering the averment in the declaration as immaterial in an action against the maker.

The counsel for the defendant, prayed the court, in substance, to instruct the jury, that if the defendant, or Mr. Hoffman, his partner, had paid and taken up the lent note, the plaintiffs could not recover upon the guaranty note. And the plaintiffs prayed the court, in substance, to instruct the jury that, if the lent note was taken up, in whole, or in part, with funds furnished by the lenders, the plaintiffs are entitled to recover upon the guaranty note, to the extent of the funds thus furnished by them. Both of which instructions THE COURT in effect gave.

Yerdiet for the plaintiffs, $2,135.68, and interest from the 31st of May, 1825.

Five bills of exception were taken; but no writ of error was issued.
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, John D. Hellmann, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Shoe Pavilion, Inc. for the period ended October 1, 2005; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based upon such evaluation; 

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: November 15, 2005