alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 51597.

#### Protests 125700-K, etc., of Air Express International, Inc., et al. (Los Angeles and San Francisco).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400-the court dismissed the protests.
May 2015 Jason Youn Photography LLC 2342 W. 8th Ave Mesa AZ 85202 Help@JasonYoun.com 480-207-7209

Dear Sir or Madam,

Jason Youn Photography LLC would like to submit the following as an amendment to Docket No FAA-2014-0233. This is a petition to amend Exemption No. 11452:

Due to rapidly advancing UAS technology in both performance and safety mechanisms, Jason Youn Photography would like to amend Exemption No. 11452 to include more aircraft than are listed in the original exemption. These new unmanned aircraft (UAS) have several added safety mechanisms including but not limited to: *Ground looking cameras for more stability in flight. *More accurate GPS systems for greater reliability. *More reliable lifting motors to run the thrust propulsion systems. *More reliable computer based Engine Control Units. *Higher resolution video feeds to ground for greater situational awareness. *More flight data sent to the ground controls for grater situational awareness. *More reliable fail safe features for greater safety on the ground.! ! For these added safety reasons Jason Youn Photography would like to add the DJI Phantom 3 series and future Phantom iterations of the popular UAS to the list of approved aircraft.

The above paragraph is in keeping with the FAA’s publicly stated goal of maintaining flexibility to accommodate future technological innovation.

Yours, Jason Youn Jason Youn Photography LLC 

## Petition to amend Exemption No. 11452
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1094 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1094

   To amend the Federal Reserve Act to broaden the range of discount 
window loans which may be used as collateral for Federal reserve notes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 11, 1999

   Mr. Leach (for himself, Mr. LaFalce, Mr. Bachus, and Ms. Waters) 
 introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on 
                     Banking and Financial Services

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
   To amend the Federal Reserve Act to broaden the range of discount 
window loans which may be used as collateral for Federal reserve notes.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled, That the 2d sentence of 
the 2d undesignated paragraph of section 16 of the Federal Reserve Act 
(12 U.S.C. 412) is amended by striking ``acceptances acquired under 
section 13 of this Act'' and inserting ``acceptances acquired under 
section 10A, 10B, 13, or 13A of this Act''.
                                 <all>
```
Exhibit
99.4
 
 CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS
 
 
 We
consent to the use of our reports dated February 27, 2008 relating to the
financial statements (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes
a separate report titled Comments by Independent Registered Chartered
Accountants on Canada-United States of America Reporting Difference referring to
changes in accounting principles) of Enerplus Resources Fund and the
effectiveness of Enerplus Resources Fund's internal control over financial
reporting appearing in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of Enerplus Resources
Fund for the year ended December 31, 2007.
    /s/ Deloitte &
      Touche LLPIndependent
      Registered Chartered Accountants
  Calgary,
Alberta
 February
27, 2008
# C_2016016EN.01004402.xml

| 18.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 16/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 16/44

---

Action brought on 10 November 2015 — Lidl Stiftung v OHIM (JEDE FLASCHE ZÄHLT!)

(Case T-623/15)

(2016/C 016/53)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Lidl Stiftung & Co. KG (Neckarsulm, Germany) (represented by: M. Wolter, A. Marx and A. Berger, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word elements ‘JEDE FLASCHE ZÄHLT!’ — Application No 13 510 123

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 7 September 2015 in Case R 479/2015-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs, including the costs in respect of the proceedings before OHIM. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs, including the costs in respect of the proceedings before OHIM.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 7(2) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 7(2) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
No. 52863.

#### Mattia Locatelli N. Y. Branch, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 85837-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain ehee.se is similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Scaramelli*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706), Abstract 42146, and Abstract 48269, it was held that an allowance of 2% percent should have been made in the weight of the cheese by the collector in computing the duty thereon to compensate for the weight of the inedible coverings on the outside of the cheese. It was further stipulated that the Sardo cheese involved is the same as that the subject of Abstract 48853. It was therefore held that 20 eases of Sardo cheese out of lot marked FI OR-1-101/150 and 50 cases out of lot FIOR-2-151/200 are properly dutiable at 5 cents per pound, but not less than 25 percent ad valorem, under paragraph 710, as modified by the trade agreement with Argentina (T. D. 50504),
**Exhibit 31.2**

 

CERTIFICATE OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER - Rule 13a-14 (17 CFR240.13a-14)

 

I, Thomas A. Dolan, certify that:

 

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB, as amended, of QRS MusicTechnologies, Inc.;

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain anyuntrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessaryto make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisannual report;

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financialstatements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in allmaterial respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flowsof the Company as of, and for,the periods presented in this annual report;

 

4. TheCompany’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-14and 15d-14) for the Company and have:

 

a) designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

 

b) evaluated theeffectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of adate within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the “EvaluationDate”); and

 

c) presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and proceduresbased on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

 

5. Theregistrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation, to theregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):

 

a) allsignificant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’sauditors any material

 

1

----

 

weaknesses ininternal controls; and

 

b) anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in theregistrant’s internal controls; and

 

6. The registrant’sother certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether ornot there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factorsthat could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of ourmost recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard tosignificant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

 

 
| Date: October 12,  2005 |                     |
|------------------------------|--------------------------|
|                         |                     |
|                         | /s/  Thomas A. Dolan     |   |
|                         | Thomas  A. Dolan         |
|                         | Chief  Executive Officer |

 

2

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JOSEPH ZINGALE and

JOAN ZINGALE

:

:

: CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-CV-4179

Plaintiffs, :

:

v. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION;

BAYER AG;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE;

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM

:

:

:

:

:

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

:

Defendants. :

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of the Court:

Kindly enter the appearances of Hope S. Freiwald, Aline Fairweather, Erin

Brennan and Kirstin J. Miller as attorneys for defendant GlaxoSmithKline PLC.

Respectfully Submitted,

_____________________________ _____________________________

Hope S. Freiwald Aline Fairweather

_____________________________ _____________________________

Erin Brennan Kirstin J. Miller

DECHERT PRICE & RHOADS

4000 Bell Atlantic Tower

1717 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2793

(215) 994-4000

Case 2:02-cv-04179-JK Document 7 Filed 09/11/2002 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-7781

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Petitioner - Appellee,

versus

MARK EARL JONES,

Respondent - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern

District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, Senior

District Judge. (CA-00-570-BR)

Submitted: June 30, 2005 Decided: July 11, 2005

Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Thomas P. McNamara, Federal Public Defender, Stephen C. Gordon,

Assistant Federal Public Defender, Jane E. Pearce, Research and

Writing Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellant. Frank D.

Whitney, United States Attorney, Anne M. Hayes, Assistant United

States Attorney, Michelle T. Fuseyamore, Special Assistant United

States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Mark Earl Jones was sentenced to nine years of

imprisonment in 1990 for bank robbery and use of a firearm in the

commission of a crime of violence. Jones was released in 1998 but

thereafter had his supervised release revoked and was sentenced to

twenty-four months of incarceration. (J.A. 21, 23). Jones was

diagnosed with schizophrenia and upon motion of the Government was

committed to the custody of the Attorney General under 18 U.S.C.

§ 4246 (2000). In 2002, Jones was conditionally released from his

civil commitment under § 4246(e). Jones’ conditional release was

revoked in April 2003. 

In December of 2003, Jones sought a hearing to again

review whether he could be discharged from the custody of the

Attorney General under 18 U.S.C. § 4247(h) (2000). Following a

hearing on the motion, the district court found that Jones

continued to meet the criteria for commitment under § 4246. Jones

appeals, arguing that he has met the requirements for release from

his civil commitment.

We do not find that the district court clearly erred in

its factual determination that Jones failed to meet the

requirements for release from custody. See 18 U.S.C. § 4246(e)

(2000); United States v. Cox, 964 F.3d 1431, 1433 (4th Cir. 1992)

(stating general review standard for factual findings under

§ 4246). Accordingly, we affirm. We dispense with oral argument
- 3 -

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in

the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
##### 



SECOND AMENDMENT TO LEASE AGREEMENT
 Second
Amendment ARE-3770 TANSY STREET, LLC, Landlord  SGX PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., (Tenant).
 RECITALS
 A. Lease
 B.
 C.
 NOW, THEREFORE,
 1.
    
    Term. The definition of Term on the first page of the Lease is hereby deleted
in its entirety and replaced with the following:
 Term:
 2.
    
    Base Rent. Tenant shall continue to pay Base Rent for the Premises as required
pursuant to the Lease through the expiration of the Term.3.
    
    Broker. Landlord and Tenant each represents and warrants that it has not
dealt with any broker, agent or other person (collectively,
Broker) in connection with the
transaction reflected in this Second Amendment and that no Broker brought about this
transaction. Landlord and Tenant each hereby agree to indemnify and hold the other harmless
from and against any claims by any Broker claiming a commission or other form of compensation
by virtue of having dealt with Tenant or Landlord, as applicable, with regard to this leasing
transaction.4.
    
    Miscellaneous.
 (a)
 
 1




---



##### 



(b)
 (c)
 (d)
 [Signatures are on the next page.]
 
 2




---



##### 



IN WITNESS WHEREOF,
 LANDLORD:
    
    ARE-3770 TANSY STREET, LLC,a Delaware limited liability companyBy:
    
    ALEXANDRIA REAL ESTATE EQUITIES,L.P., a Delaware limited partnership,managing memberBy:
    
    ARE-QRS CORP.,a Maryland corporation,general partnerBy:
    
    /s/ Jennifer PappasIts:
    
    V.P. and Assistant
Secretary
 TENANT:
    
    SGX PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.,a Delaware corporationBy:
    
    /s/ Todd MyersIts:
    
    CFO
 
 3
No. 50859.

#### Protests 112759-K, etc., of C. J. Tower & Sons (Buffalo).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that passed upon in *Tower & Sons*v. *United States*(14 Cust. Ct. 94, C. D. 919). In accordance therewith the claim for free entry was sustained.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

VERONICA LANGSTON :

: CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-CV-4157

Plaintiff, :

:

v. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION;

BAYER AG;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE;

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM

:

:

:

:

:

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

:

Defendants. :

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of the Court:

Kindly enter the appearances of Hope S. Freiwald, Aline Fairweather, Erin

Brennan and Kirstin J. Miller as attorneys for defendant GlaxoSmithKline PLC.

Respectfully Submitted,

_____________________________ _____________________________

Hope S. Freiwald Aline Fairweather

_____________________________ _____________________________

Erin Brennan Kirstin J. Miller

DECHERT PRICE & RHOADS

4000 Bell Atlantic Tower

1717 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2793

(215) 994-4000

Case 2:02-cv-04157-JD Document 7 Filed 09/11/2002 Page 1 of 1
Document

Exhibit 10.9


AMENDMENT NO. 2


TO THE 


EQUIFAX INC. 2008 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN


(Amended and Restated Effective May 2, 2013)






THIS AMENDMENT NO. 2 is made as of this 4th day of November, 2020 by Equifax Inc. (the “Company”);


WHEREAS, the Company maintains the Equifax Inc. 2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as amended and restated effective May 2, 2013 and as further amended on February 13, 2017 (the “Plan”); and


WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan to revise the definition of “Retirement” under the Plan for employees hired on or after January 1, 2021.


NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended effective as of November 4, 2020, as follows:


1.


Section 2(aa) is deleted in its entirety and the following substituted therefor:


(a)(a) “Retirement” means, except as otherwise determined by the Administrator and set forth in an Award Agreement, with respect to employee Participants, termination of employment from the Company and its Affiliates (for other than Cause): (i) for Participants who commenced employment prior to January 1, 2021, on or after attainment of age fifty (50) and the sum of the Participant’s age plus completed anniversary years of service with the Company and its Affiliates is at least 75; (ii) on or after attainment of age (A) fifty-five (55) for Participants who commenced employment prior to January 1, 2021 and (B) sixty (60) for Participants who commenced employment on or after January 1, 2021, and, in either case, completion of at least five (5) anniversary years of service with the Company and its Affiliates; or (iii) on or after attainment of age sixty-five (65); provided that, with respect to Non-Employee Director Participants, “Retirement” means the Director’s resignation or failure to be re-elected on or after attainment of age fifty-five (55) and completion of five (5) anniversary years of service with the Company as a director.


2.


Except as hereby modified, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.






[Signature page follows.]


1










IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has executed this Amendment No. 2 as of the date first written above.


EQUIFAX INC.


By: /s/ John J. Kelley III                        
Name: John J. Kelley III
Title:   Corporate Vice President, Chief Legal 
            Officer and Corporate Secretary
2
AFS-11-114-E 

February 24, 2011 

 Exemption No. 8843B 

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2006-26738 

Mr. David L. Jones 

Corporate Aviation Education Director 

Aviation Institute of Maintenance 

4455 South Boulevard 

Virginia Beach, VA 23452 

Dear Mr. Jones: 

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition to extend Exemption No. 8843, 

as amended. It explains the basis for our decision and describes its effect. 

The Basis for Our Decision 

By letter dated December 26, 2010, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration 

(FAA) on behalf of Aviation Institute of Maintenance (Aviation Institute) (operating under 

Air Agency Certificate U5DT571K) for an extension of Exemption No. 8843, as amended. 

That exemption from § 65.75(a) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations allows Aviation 

Institute to administer the aviation mechanic general written test to students immediately 

following their successful completion of the general curriculum but before they meet the 

experience requirements of § 65.77. 

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons 

regarding public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. 

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register. The requested extension of the exemption would not set a precedent, 

and any delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to Aviation Institute. 
2 

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 8843, as 

amended, remains valid with respect to this exemption and is in the public interest. 

Therefore, under the authority provided by 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA 

Administrator has delegated to me, I grant your petition. 

The Effect of Our Decision

Our decision extends the termination date of Exemption No. 8843, as amended, to 

February 28, 2013, unless sooner superseded or rescinded. 

All conditions and limitations of Exemption No. 8843 remain the same. This letter must be 

attached to, and is a part of, Exemption No. 8843. 

Sincerely, 

/s/ 

Raymond Towles 

Acting Director, Flight Standards Service
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-06-00610-CR

Maurice A. Lomas, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 27TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. 59109, HONORABLE JOE CARROLL, JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

A jury found appellant Maurice A. Lomas guilty of failing to register as a sex

offender. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 62.102 (West 2006) (former art. 62.10). The court

assessed punishment, enhanced by two previous felony offenses, at ninety-nine years’ imprisonment.

Appellant’s court-appointed attorney filed a brief concluding that the appeal is

frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738

(1967), by presenting a professional evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no

arguable grounds to be advanced. See also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75 (1988); High v. State,

573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App. 1978); Currie v. State, 516 S.W.2d 684 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974);

Jackson v. State, 485 S.W.2d 553 (Tex. Crim. App. 1972); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137

(Tex. Crim. App. 1969). Appellant also filed a pro se brief.
2

We have reviewed the record, counsel’s brief, and the pro se brief. We find nothing

in the record that might arguably support the appeal. See Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826-27

(Tex. Crim. App. 2005).

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

__________________________________________

David Puryear, Justice

Before Chief Justice Law, Justices Puryear and Henson

Affirmed

Filed: July 12, 2007

Do Not Publish
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
       (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
                              UNITED STATES CODE)

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sabanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a)
and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) (the
"Act"), I, R. Steve Letbetter, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Reliant
Resources, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge:

     (1) The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December
         31, 2001 (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of
         Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition, results of operations and
         cash flows of the Company.

Date: November 12, 2002                               /s/ R. Steve Letbetter
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                          R. Steve Letbetter
                                                     Chairman and Chief
                                                     Executive Officer



     The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section
906 of the Act and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document