alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
#### ROBINSON v. ROBINSON.

Civ. A. No. 11348.

District Court of the United States for the District of Columbia.

June 11, 1942.

B. V. Lawson, Jr., of Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.

, Joel D. Blackwell, of Washington, D. C, for defendant.

ADKINS, Justice.

In this case the attorney appointed to defend seeks to recover his fee by way of contempt proceedings.

Defendant Milton Robinson was duly served with process but failed to appear and Mr. Blackwell was appointed as attorney to defend under section 982 of the 1901 Code, now section 16 — 418 of the 1940 Code.

This section provides that an attorney so appointed shall receive such compensation for his services as the court may determine to be proper, such compensation to be paid by the parties as the court may direct.

In the present case the final decree granting a divorce to plaintiff ordered defendant to pay a fee to the attorney appointed to defend.

In Rapeer v. Colpoys, 66 App. D. C. 216, 85 F.2d 715 the Court of Appeals held that a fee could not be collected by means of imprisonment unless the statute authorizing payment of the fee expressly so required. There is no such provision in the statute here relied upon.

I am unable to distinguish this case from the Rapeer case and therefore the motion for adjudication in contempt is denied.
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of China Nuvo Solar Energy, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended July 31, 2010, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas G Toland, Principal Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company, as of, and for the periods presented in the Report.  /s/ Thomas G TolandThomas G TolandChief Executive Officer and President
(Principal Executive Officer)April 4, 2012  A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to China Nuvo Solar Energy, Inc. and will be retained by China Nuvo Solar Energy, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS4595 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 217 (Monday, November 13, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 77594]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-24968]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; Notice of 
Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 
U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could 
disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as 
patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals 
associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would 
constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

    Name of Committee: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious 
Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Autoimmunity Centers of Excellence, 
Clinical Research Program (UM1 Clinical Trial Required).
    Date: December 12-13, 2023.
    Time: 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    Place: National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G41, 
Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Kelly L. Hudspeth, Ph.D., Scientific Review 
Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural 
Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, 
National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G41, 
Rockville, MD 20852, 240-669-5067, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4328262f2f3a6d2b3627303326372b032d2a2b6d242c35"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="412a242d2d386f2934253231243529012f28296f262e37">[email protected]</span></a>.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, 
Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, 
Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes 
of Health, HHS)

    Dated: November 7, 2023.
David W. Freeman,
Supervisory Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee 
Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-24968 Filed 11-9-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.1
                               BIB HOLDINGS, LTD.
    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of BIB Holdings, Ltd. (the Company) on Form
10-KSB for the period ended  December 31, 2003 as filed with the  Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof (the  Report),  I, Gail  Binder,  Chief
Executive Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to BIB Holdings,  Ltd. and will be retained by BIB  Holdings,  Ltd. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Date:  March 17, 2004

/s/ Gail Binder
-----------------------
Gail Binder
Chief Executive Officer
# C_2015127EN.01003801.xml

| 20.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 127/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 127/38

---

Action brought on 26 February 2015 — Mozzetti v OHIM — di Lelio (ALFREDO’S GALLERY alla Scrofa Roma)

(Case T-97/15)

(2015/C 127/51)

Language in which the application was lodged: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Mario Mozzetti (Rome, Italy) (represented by: E. Montelione, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Ines di Lelio (Rome, Italy)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: Figurative mark containing the word elements ‘ALFREDO’S GALLERY alla Scrofa Roma’ — Community trade mark No 3 108 289

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

Procedure before OHIM

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 2 December 2014 in Case R 656/2014-1

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs of the proceedings before the General Court of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs of the proceedings before the General Court of the European Union.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Rule 50(1) of Regulation No 2868/95 insofar as it relates to Rule 20(2) of that regulation; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Rule 50(1) of Regulation No 2868/95 insofar as it relates to Rule 20(2) of that regulation;

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
Exhibit 32

                CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


         The  undersigned,  who are the chief  executive  officer  and the chief
financial  officer of GrandSouth  Bancorporation,  Inc.,  each hereby  certifies
that, to the best of his knowledge,  the  accompanying  Form 10-KSB for the year
ended December 31, 2006,  fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that information  contained
in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the issuer.

March 30, 2007

                                       s/Mason Y. Garrett
                                       -----------------------------------
                                       Mason Y. Garrett
                                       Chief Executive Officer


                                       s/J. B. Garrett
                                       -----------------------------
                                       J. B. Garrett
                                       Chief Financial Officer
No. 59456.

protests 194806-K, etc. (New York).

#### Baar & Beards, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

*308Opinion by

FoRD, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silk scarves or squares similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *The Specialty House, Inc., Bryant & Heffernan, Inc., et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 136, C. A. D. 585), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
EXHIBIT 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly
Report of Duke Capital LLC (Duke Capital) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Steven K. Young, Chief Financial Officer and
Controller of Duke Capital, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Duke Capital.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                                      
|------------------------------------------------------
|                                                      
|/S/    STEVEN K.
YOUNG                                
|Steven K. Young Chief
Financial Officer and Controller
|August 15, 2005
No. 64028.

protests 58/25520, etc. (Seattle).

#### Close & Stewart *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of prepared or preserved pork similar in all material respects to that the subject of *C. J. Tower & Sons*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 36, C.D. 2100), the claim of ‘the plaintiff was sustained.
# Version

History	

# FIDS-Organization
Before the Third Division,

January 28, 1952

No. 56318.

protests 171757-K, etc. (Los Angeles).

#### All American Distributing Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
# Bi-Weekly Report

&P

# image1.jpg
Document

Exhibit 10.8


AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO THE
EQUIFAX INC. 2008 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN
(Amended and Restated Effective May 2, 2013)


THIS AMENDMENT NO. 1 is made as of this 13th day of February, 2017 by Equifax Inc. (the “Company”);


WHEREAS, the Company maintains the Equifax Inc. 2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as amended and restated effective May 2, 2013 (the “Plan”); and


WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan to conform to new accounting rules that eliminate the requirement to limit stock withholding to the minimum statutory rate.


NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended effective as of February 6, 2017, as follows:


1.


Section 17(a) is deleted in its entirety and the following substituted therefor:


"(a) Withholding. In the event the Company or an Affiliate of the Company is required to withhold any Federal, state or local taxes or other amounts in respect of any income recognized by a Participant as a result of the grant, vesting, payment or settlement of an Award or disposition of any Shares acquired under an Award, the Company may deduct (or require an Affiliate to deduct) from any payments of any kind otherwise due the Participant cash, or Shares otherwise deliverable or vesting under an Award, to satisfy such required tax withholding obligations. Alternatively, the Company may require such Participant to pay to the Company, in cash, promptly on demand, or make other arrangements satisfactory to the Company regarding the payment to the Company of the aggregate amount of any such taxes and other amounts. If Shares are deliverable upon exercise or payment of an Award, the Committee may provide in the Award agreement for the Participant to satisfy all or a portion of the Federal, state and local withholding tax obligations arising in connection with such Award by electing to: (a) have the Company withhold Shares otherwise issuable under the Award; (b) tender back Shares received in connection with such Award; or (c) deliver other previously owned Shares; provided that the amount to be withheld may not exceed the federal, state and local tax withholding obligations associated with the transaction to the extent needed for the Company to treat such award as an equity award for accounting purposes and to comply with applicable tax withholding rules. If an election is provided, the election must be made on or before the date as of which the amount of tax to be withheld is determined and otherwise as the Committee requires. In any case, the Company may defer making payment or delivery under any Award if any such tax may be pending unless and until indemnified to its satisfaction."


2.


Except as hereby modified, the Plan shall remain in full force and effect.
























1






IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has executed this Amendment No. 1 as of the date first written above.


EQUIFAX INC.


By: /s/ John J. Kelley III                               
Name:    John J. Kelley III
Title:    Corporate Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary
2
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 31.1

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Jeffrey Staszak, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Volterra Semiconductor
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the registrant's fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: October 28, 2004             By:      /s/ Jeffrey Staszak
                                            ---------------------------------
                                            Jeffrey Staszak
                                            Chief Executive Officer
Before the Third Division,

June 18, 1943

No. 48403.

#### Protest 41268-K of California Land & Cattle Co. (Nogales).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

There were five entries covered by this protest, all filed at the port of San Luis, Ariz. It appeared that one of the officers of the importing firm arrived at the customhouse at 8:45 a. m. on the morning of January 2, 1940, and waited until the office was open for business at 9:00 a. m. and immediately presented those five entries in a “bunch,” with certified checks covering duty at 1)4 cents per pound on the cattle withdrawn, and that the collector stamped the first entry “9.00 a. m.,” the second “9.0002 a. m.,” the third “9.0005 a. m.,” the fourth “9.0007 a. m.,” and the fifth “9.0009 a. m.” At the trial it was stipulated that the entries were all presented to the collector in a bunch at 9:00 a. m., as recited in the protest. It appeared from the official documents that the established quota on cattle weighing 700 pounds or over for the first quarter of the year 1940 to be assessed at 1)4 cents per pound was 8,280 head, which was 57.107 percent of the total imports received at the opening hour of the quota; second, that on withdrawal of the animals covered by entry 1 SL in this case duty was assessed at 1)4 cents per pound on 352 head of cattle under that quota and at 3 cents per pound on the remaining 264 head, but that on the other four entries duty was assessed at 3 cents per pound, and no parts of the importation covered by those entries participated in the quota at 1)4 cents per pound. In view of *Burr*v. *United States*(9 Cust Ct. 13, C. D. 651) it was held that 57.107 percent of the cattle covered by the remaining four entries in this case should have been assessed with duty at cents per pound. The protest was sustained to that extent. The assessment of duty on the cattle covered by the first entry (1 SL), seeming to conform with the requirements of the quota, the protest was overruled as to that entry.
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20460



# JUL '"52011**U~~** t".;,iR AJ'>lC Rf"DIAri( 1<1
Mr. David R. Tripp Stinson Morrison Hecker, LLP 1201 Walnut Street, Suite 2900 Kansas City, Missouri 64106-2150

Dear Mr. Tripp:

Thank you for your letter ofJune 10,2011, requesting an extension ofthe public comment period for the proposed "National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants from Coaland Oil-fired Electric Utility Steam Generating Units and Standards ofPerformance for FossilFuel-Fired Electric Utility, Industrial-Commercial-Institutional, and Small IndustrialCommercial-Institutional Steam Generating Units" (the Mercury and Air Toxics Standards rule), which was published inthe 

### Federal Register on May 3, 2011. The proposal identified a public comment period of60 days; that period would have ended on July 5,2011. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, however, recently announced an extension ofthe comment period by 30 days to August 4.

While we are extending the commentperiod, we are not seeking to extend theNovember 16, 2011, deadline for signature ofthe final rule, and remain committed to meeting that deadline.

The 30-day extension will provide the public with a 140-dayperiod to reviewthe proposal. As you know, interestedparties were aware ofthe posting on March 16,2011, ofthe signed proposal onthe EPA's website (http://www.epa.gov/ttnlatw/utilitylutilitypg.html), along with much ofthe pertinent supporting documentation (including the analyses used in establishing the proposed emission limits andthe technical support documents). The proposal was published a little over six weeks later, on May 3, marking the beginning ofthe formal public comment period. This will provide the public with approximately 140 days to review and provide written comments onthe proposed rule and supporting documents. It will also provide at least 60 days for other documentation that was notposted onthe website until after the proposed rule was signed. Dueto the substantive issues specific to thisrulemaking , this commentperiod is significantly longer than statutorily required.

Internet Address (URL) • htlp.ilwww.epa.gov Recycled/Recyclable' Pnnted w,th Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100%, Postconsurr-er. Process Chlorine F'ee'Recycled Pape'Again, thank you for your letter. We look forward to thetimely receipt ofyour comments.**Si~erely,**

# l~~~

# .-:-'----,**--7Jvi/W~**

# '~na McCarthy Assistant Administrator
SOP No.: INST 1 Page 1 of 2
SOP No.: INST 1 Page 2 of 2