alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2018072EN.01000602.xml

| 26.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 72/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 72/6

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 20 December 2017 — Comunidad Autónoma de Galicia, Redes de Telecomunicación Galegas Retegal SA (Retegal) v European Commission, SES Astra SA

(Case C-70/16 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - State aid - Digital television - Aid for the deployment of digital terrestrial television in remote and less urbanised areas - Subsidies granted to operators of digital terrestrial television platforms - Decision declaring the aid incompatible in part with the internal market - Concept of ‘State aid’ - Advantage - Service of general economic interest - Definition - Discretion of the Member States))

(2018/C 072/07)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Appellants: Comunidad Autónoma de Galicia, Redes de Telecomunicación Galegas Retegal, SA (Retegal) (represented by: F. J. García Martínez and B. Pérez Conde, abogados)

Appellants:

Other parties to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: P. Němečková, É. Gippini Fournier and B. Stromsky, acting as Agents), SES Astra (represented by F. González Díaz and V. Romero Algarra, abogados, and by F. Salerno, avocat)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 26 November 2015, Comunidad Autónoma de Galicia and Retegal v Commission (T-463/13 and T-464/13, not published, EU:T:2015:901); |
| --- | --- |

1.

Sets aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 26 November 2015, Comunidad Autónoma de Galicia and Retegal v Commission (T-463/13 and T-464/13, not published, EU:T:2015:901);

| 2. | Annuls Commission Decision 2014/489/EU of 19 June 2013 on State aid SA.28599 (C 23/2010) (ex NN 36/2010, ex CP 163/2009) implemented by the Kingdom of Spain for the deployment of digital terrestrial television in remote and less urbanised areas (outside Castilla-La Mancha); |
| --- | --- |

2.

Annuls Commission Decision 2014/489/EU of 19 June 2013 on State aid SA.28599 (C 23/2010) (ex NN 36/2010, ex CP 163/2009) implemented by the Kingdom of Spain for the deployment of digital terrestrial television in remote and less urbanised areas (outside Castilla-La Mancha);

| 3. | Orders the European Commission to bear the costs incurred by the Comunidad Autónoma de Galicia (Autonomous Community of Galicia, Spain) and Redes de Telecomunicación Galegas Retegal SA (Retegal) in the present appeal and at first instance; |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the European Commission to bear the costs incurred by the Comunidad Autónoma de Galicia (Autonomous Community of Galicia, Spain) and Redes de Telecomunicación Galegas Retegal SA (Retegal) in the present appeal and at first instance;

| 4. | Orders SES Astra SA to bears its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Orders SES Astra SA to bears its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 118, 4.4.2016.

1

---
# C_2018142EN.01000701.xml

| 23.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 142/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 142/7

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 28 February 2018 — mobile.de GmbH, formerly mobile.international GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), Rezon OOD

(Case C-418/16 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - EU trade mark - Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Article 15(1) - Article 57(2) and (3) - Article 64 - Article 76(2) - Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 - Rule 22(2) - Rule 40(6) - Invalidity proceedings - Applications for a declaration of invalidity based on an earlier national trade mark - Genuine use of the earlier mark - Burden of proof - Rejection of the applications - Taking into account by the Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of new evidence - Annulment of the decisions of the Cancellation Division of EUIPO - Referral - Consequences))

(2018/C 142/09)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Appellant: mobile.de GmbH, formerly mobile.international GmbH (represented by: T. Lührig, Rechtsanwalt)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) (represented by: M. Fischer, acting as Agent), Rezon OOD (represented by: P. Kanchev, advokat)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders mobile.de GmbH to pay the costs incurred by the European Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and by Rezon ODD. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders mobile.de GmbH to pay the costs incurred by the European Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) and by Rezon ODD.

---

(1)  OJ C 419, 14.11.2016.

1

---
November 28, 1956

No. 60395.

protest 231564-K.

#### F. W. Myers & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Motion of Government for rehearing denied.
# C_2015118EN.01003801.xml

| 13.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/38 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/38

---

Action brought on 12 February 2015 — Jaguar Land Rover v OHIM — Nissan Jidosha (Land Glider)

(Case T-71/15)

(2015/C 118/48)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Jaguar Land Rover Ltd (Coventry, United Kingdom) (represented by: R. Ingerl, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Nissan Jidosha KK (Yokohama-shi, Kanagawa-ken, Japan)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Applicant: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant:

Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘Land Glider’ — Community trade mark application No 8 3 24  196

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before OHIM

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 9 December 2014 in Case R 1415/2013-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs incurred by the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs incurred by the applicant.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of ebank.com, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Wayne W. Byers, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.



                                    /s/  Wayne W. Byers
                                    -----------------------
                                    Wayne W. Byers
                                    Chief Financial Officer
                                    November 14, 2002
<PAGE>   1
                                  EXHIBIT 11.0
                     NORTHEAST PENNSYLVANIA FINANCIAL CORP.
              STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                        THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 1998
                   (in thousands, except per share amounts)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                   Three Months Ended
                                             June 30, 1998    June 30, 1997
                                              -----------     -------------
<S>                                           <C>             <C>
Net Income                                    $       991          --
                                              ===========         ===
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Weighted average shares outstanding             6,427,350          --
Less:  Unallocated shares held by ESOP           (514,188)         --
Plus:  ESOP shares released or
committed to be released during                          
the fiscal  year                                   17,140          --
                                              -----------         ---
                                                5,930,302          --
                                              ===========         ===
Earnings per share (1)                        $      0.17         N/A
                                              ===========         ===
</TABLE>

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                      Nine Months Ended
                                               June 30, 1998     June 30, 1997
                                                -----------      -------------

<S>                                             <C>              <C>
Net Loss                                        $      (942)         --
                                                ===========         ===

Weighted average shares outstanding:
 Weighted average shares outstanding              6,427,350          --
  Less:  Unallocated shares held by ESOP           (514,188)         --

  ESOP shares released
  or committed to be
  released during the fiscal year                    17,140          --
                                                -----------         ---
                                                  5,930,302          --
                                                ===========         ===

Earnings per share(1)                           $     (0.16)        N/A
                                                ===========         ===
</TABLE>

--------
(1) Earnings per share, basic and diluted, are the same for the three months
ended June 30, 1998 and the nine months ended June 30, 1998


                                       26
# C_2018161EN.01000501.xml

| 7.5.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 161/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.5.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 161/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 6 March 2018 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Szombathelyi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság — Hungary) — ‘SEGRO’ Kft. v Vas Megyei Kormányhivatal Sárvári Járási Földhivatala (C-52/16), Günther Horváth v Vas Megyei Kormányhivatal (C-113/16)

(Joined Cases C-52/16 and C-113/16) (1)

1

((References for a preliminary ruling - Article 63 TFEU - Free movement of capital - Rights of usufruct over agricultural land - National legislation permitting such rights to be acquired in the future only by close family members of the owner of the land and cancelling, without providing for compensation, the rights previously acquired by legal persons or by natural persons who cannot demonstrate a close family tie with the owner of the land))

(2018/C 161/04)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Referring court

Szombathelyi Közigazgatási és Munkaügyi Bíróság

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants:‘SEGRO’ Kft. (C-52/16), Günther Horváth (C-113/16)

Applicants:

Defendants: Vas Megyei Kormányhivatal Sárvári Járási Földhivatala (C-52/16), Vas Megyei Kormányhivatal (C-113/16)

Defendants:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 63 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, under which rights of usufruct which have previously been created over agricultural land and the holders of which do not have the status of close relation of the owner of that land are extinguished by operation of law and are, consequently, deleted from the property registers.

---

(1)  OJ C 136, 18.4.2016.

1

OJ C 211, 13.6.2016.

---
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before GASTON, HOUTZ, and COGLEY Appellate Military Judges

_________________________ 

### UNITED STATES Appellee

v. Mickey W. JOHNSON, J r . Private First Class (E

- 2 ), U.S. Marine Corps Appellant

No. 201800249

Decided: 4 October 2021
Appeal from the United States Navy

- Marine Corps Trial Judiciary
Military Judge : Ann K. Minami
Sentence adjudged 7 October 2020 by a special court

- martial convened at Marine Corps Support Facility Louisiana , consisting of a military judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment : reduction to E

- 1, confinement for 12 months , a nd a bad

- conduct discharge

. For Appellant: Lieutenant Michael W. Wester, JAGC, USN
For Appellee: Brian K. Keller, Esq.United States v. Johnson , NMCCA No. 20 1800249 Opinion of the Court

2 _________________________ This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2 (a)

.

_________________________
PER CURIAM : After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of
error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to A ppellant’s substantial rights occurred. 1
T he findings and sentence are AFFIRMED

.

FOR THE COURT:

RODGER A. DREW, JR. Clerk of Court

1 Uniform Code of Military Justice arts. 59, 66, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
No. 51910.

#### W. T. Grant Co. *v.*United States,

protest 130345-K/12657 (New Orleans).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the figures are similar in all material respects to the merchandise the subject of *Joseph Schmidt, Inc.*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 188, C. D. 690) the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 57926.

protests 150800-K, etc. (New York).

#### The Fan Co. and National Carloading Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the articles in question consist of silent butlers, smoothing irons, and trays the same in all material respects as those involved in *Ignaz Strauss & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 342, C. D. 710), *The Fan Co.*v. *United States*(25 Cust. Ct. 42, C. D. 1261), and *Ignaz Strauss & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(28 Cust. Ct. 280, C. D. 1423), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Exhibit
32.2





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Annual Report of
Convera Corporation (the "Company") on Form 10-K for fiscal year ended January
31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the "Report"), I, Matthew G. Jones, Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








By: /s/ Matthew G.
Jones


Matthew
G. Jones


Chief
Financial Officer


May 18,
2010
#### [Protective Life and Annuity Insurance Company Letterhead]

## Exhibit 99(b)

#### CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                                              18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                                              AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                                   SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the
Quarterly Report of Protective Life and Annuity Insurance Company (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Wayne E. Stuenkel,
President of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

| | (1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
| | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

/s/Wayne E. Stuenkel
Wayne E. Stuenkel
President
May 15, 2003

This  certification  accompanies  the Report  pursuant to §906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and shall not,  except to the extent
required by the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002,  be deemed  filed by the Company for  purposes of § 18 of the  Securities  Exchange Act of
1934, as amended.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JUAN and ARACELI RAMIREZ, :

: CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-CV-4114

Plaintiffs, :

:

v. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION;

BAYER AG;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE;

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM

:

:

:

:

:

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

:

Defendants. :

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of the Court:

Kindly enter the appearances of Hope S. Freiwald, Aline Fairweather, Erin

Brennan and Kirstin J. Miller as attorneys for defendant SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a

GlaxoSmithKline.

Respectfully Submitted,

_____________________________ _____________________________

Hope S. Freiwald Aline Fairweather

_____________________________ _____________________________

Erin Brennan Kirstin J. Miller

DECHERT PRICE & RHOADS

4000 Bell Atlantic Tower

1717 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2793

(215) 994-4000

Case 2:02-cv-04114-AB Document 8 Filed 10/04/2002 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of

SurgLine International, Inc., formerly,

China Nuvo Solar Energy, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended July 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Thomas G Toland, Principal Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company, as of, and for the periods presented in the Report.


| |                            
| | ---------------------------
| | /s/ Thomas G Toland        
| | Thomas G Toland            
| | Principal Executive Officer
| | February 10, 2012          

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to China Nuvo Solar Energy, Inc. and will be retained by China Nuvo Solar Energy, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS4594 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
# C_2015127EN.01003701.xml

| 20.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 127/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 127/37

---

Action brought on 26 February 2015 — Mozzetti v OHIM — di Lelio (Alfredo alla Scrofa)

(Case T-96/15)

(2015/C 127/50)

Language in which the application was lodged: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Mario Mozzetti (Rome, Italy) (represented by: E. Montelione, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Ines di Lelio (Rome, Italy)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: Figurative mark containing the word element ‘Alfredo alla Scrofa’ — Community trade mark No 6 779 151

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

Procedure before OHIM

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 2 December 2014 in Case R 655/2014-1

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order Ines di Lelio to pay the costs of the proceedings before the General Court of the European Union. |
| --- | --- |

—

order Ines di Lelio to pay the costs of the proceedings before the General Court of the European Union.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Rule 50(1) of Regulation No 2868/95 insofar as it relates to Rule 20(2) of that regulation; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Rule 50(1) of Regulation No 2868/95 insofar as it relates to Rule 20(2) of that regulation;

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Real Logic, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Bradford L. Tolley, Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer (principal financial officer) of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge and belief:

1.

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date:  April 14, 2008

|        |                                      
|------- | -------------------------------------
|Signed: | /s/ Bradford L. Tolley               
|        | Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer