alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   EXHIBIT 11



                                ENERGYSOUTH, INC.
                        COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
                      (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE DATA)

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
                                                   THREE MONTHS         TWELVE MONTHS
                                                ENDED DECEMBER 31,    ENDED DECEMBER 31,
                                                1998      1997 (1)   1998       1997 (1)
                                                ----      -------    ----      --------
<S>                                            <C>        <C>        <C>        <C>
BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE:

Earnings applicable to common stock             $2,517     $1,989     $8,946     $8,076

Weighted average common shares outstanding       4,877      4,858      4,870      4,851

Basic earnings per share                        $ 0.52     $ 0.41     $ 1.84     $ 1.66


DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE:

Earnings applicable to common stock             $2,517     $1,989     $8,946     $8,076

Weighted average common shares outstanding       4,877      4,858      4,870      4,851

Incremental shares resulting from assumed
    exercise of stock options                       50         69         56         49

Weighted average common shares outstanding,
    assuming dilution                            4,927      4,927      4,926      4,900

Diluted earnings per share                      $ 0.51     $ 0.40     $ 1.82     $ 1.65
</TABLE>

(1) Restated to reflect three-for-two conversion of Mobile Gas common stock into
    EnergySouth common stock effective February 2, 1998.
EXHIBIT 32.1

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, the undersigned officer of GMX Resources Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.



|                     |  |  |  |                          
|-------------------- |  |  |  | -------------------------
|Date: March 10, 2011 |  |  |  | /s/ Ken L. Kenworthy,
Jr.
|                     |  |  |  | Ken L. Kenworthy, Jr.    
|                     |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer
Before the Second Division,

March 20, 1968

No. P68/164.

protests 61/21767 and 64/17938 (New York).

#### Fabius & Co., Inc., and The Daher Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Bao, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of containers of tinplate, not plated with platinum, gold, or silver, and not containing electrical heating elements, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Fabius &*Co., *Inc.,*and *Daher Company, Inc.*v. *United States*(55 Cust. Ct. 305, C.D. 2595), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 66734.

#### Alltransport, Inc., c/o Charles C. Merzbach Co. *v.*United States,

protest 58/12605 (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of “Faller Houses and Kits” similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Polk’s Model Graft Hobbies, Inc., et al.*(47 C.C.P.A. 137, C.A.D. 746), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
```

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 217 (Monday, November 13, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 77582]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-24862]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION

Update to Notice of Financial Institutions for Which the Federal 
Deposit Insurance Corporation Has Been Appointed Either Receiver, 
Liquidator, or Manager

AGENCY: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

ACTION: Update listing of financial institutions in liquidation.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the Federal Deposit Insurance 
Corporation (Corporation) has been appointed the sole receiver for the 
following financial institution effective as of the Date Closed as 
indicated in the listing.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This list (as updated from time to time in 
the Federal Register) may be relied upon as ``of record'' notice that 
the Corporation has been appointed receiver for purposes of the 
statement of policy published in the July 2, 1992, issue of the Federal 
Register (57 FR 29491). For further information concerning the 
identification of any institutions which have been placed in 
liquidation, please visit the Corporation website at www.fdic.gov/bank/individual/failed/banklist.html, or contact the Chief, Receivership 
Oversight at [email protected] or at Division of Resolutions and 
Receiverships, FDIC, 600 North Pearl Street, Suite 700, Dallas, TX 
75201.

                                           Institutions in Liquidation
                                             [In alphabetical order]
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
          FDIC Ref. No.                   Bank name                 City              State         Date closed
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10545...........................  Citizens Bank...........  Sac City...........  IA                   11/03/2023
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

    Dated at Washington, DC, on November 6, 2023.
James P. Sheesley,
Assistant Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-24862 Filed 11-9-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6714-01-P
```
Payment Collection RIA SIA Zero Dollar Total

March 2016 25,874 84,437 2,929 114 31 113,385

April 2016 23,540 83,864 2,555 98 - 110,057

May 2016 24,855 81,633 2,737 110 - 109,335

Totals 74,269 249,934 8,221 322 31 332,777

 -

 50,000

 100,000

 150,000

 200,000

 250,000

 300,000

 350,000

# of transactions

Transaction Type

IPAC Transaction Count

March 2016

April 2016

May 2016

Totals
07/27/2012 18:00 FAX 2024835142 FAA ~ OMS @001/003 

UNITED ST i\ TES OF AMERICA ~~O&IVE'O JUt I 1 2012 . DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 

HEARING OOCfJ<Q' 

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 

IN TilE MATTER OF: 

SCHUMAN AVIATION, LTD., 

R;e~pondent. 

) DOCKET NO. ~Q.Q .. :: 0 1 1 f 

) 

) 

) 

) 

) 

____________________________ ) FAA Case No. 2012WI'130002 ) 

RESPONDENT'S ANSWER TO ADMINISTRATOR'S COMPLAINT 

SCHUMAN AVIATION, Respondent above-named, by his undersigned counsel, 

hereby answers the Administrator's Complaint dated July 12,2012 and received by the undersigned 

via facsimile on July 12, 2012, together with a transmittal letter from the Federal Aviation 

Administration dated July 12, 2012 a~ tbllows: 

FIRST DEFENSE 

1. The AdminisLraLvr's Complaint tails to state a claim against Respondent 

upon which relief can be granted. 

SECOND DEFENSE 

2. Respondent admits the allegations contained in paragraph J of the 

Administrator's Complaint. 

3. . Respondent denies the allegations contained in paragraphs TT, 1, 2. 3, and 4 

a t;) .Wf< 

and denies the applicability of paragraph UJ,.,3"and {1, IV, 1 and 2 of the Administrator's 

Complaint. 
07/27/2012 18:00 FAX· 2024935142 FAA + OMS @ 002/003 

THIRD DEFENSE 

4. Respondent intends to rely on any and all other affirmative defenses, the 

applicability of which may be disclosed through investigation and/or discovery. 

DATE: Honolulu, Hawaii, --~=-·....!::~:.....:(..~~~1 ..... 1'--,. --:::~:.....:v_".:.....J_"L_-__ r , 

CHRISTOPHER D. FE 

Attomey for Respondent 

-2-

-. - . -- ... . -··-·
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JOE VAN STREEPEN and

LINDA VAN STREEPEN

:

:

: CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-CV-4199

Plaintiffs, :

:

v. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION;

BAYER AG;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE;

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM

:

:

:

:

:

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

:

Defendants. :

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of the Court:

Kindly enter the appearances of Hope S. Freiwald, Aline Fairweather, Erin

Brennan and Kirstin J. Miller as attorneys for defendant GlaxoSmithKline PLC.

Respectfully Submitted,

_____________________________ _____________________________

Hope S. Freiwald Aline Fairweather

_____________________________ _____________________________

Erin Brennan Kirstin J. Miller

DECHERT PRICE & RHOADS

4000 Bell Atlantic Tower

1717 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2793

(215) 994-4000

Case 2:02-cv-04199-CMR Document 6 Filed 09/11/2002 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Eastern District of Pennsylvania

U.S. Court House

Independence Mall West

601 Market Street

Philadelphia, PA 19106-1797

215/597-1178

April 13, 2012

NOTICE OF CONFERENCE:

RE: BEHREND, ET AL v. COMCAST CORPORATION

 C.A. No. 03-6604

Dear Counsel:

Please be advised that the SCHEDULING CONFERENCE has been rescheduled for

April 24, 2012 at 2:00 p.m. in Courtroom 17B. 1

Very truly yours,

/s/John R. Padova

Gerrie Keane

Deputy Clerk to Judge Padova

To: ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD

Rescheduled from April 23, 2012. 1

Case 2:03-cv-06604-JP Document 478 Filed 04/13/12 Page 1 of 1
Before the Third Division,

January 18, 1950

No. 53938.

#### The Frank Tea & Spice Co. *v.*United States,

protest 121983-K (Cleveland).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation that the merchandise consists of laurel leaves similar in all material respects to those the subject of *The Levy & Levis Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(23 Cust. Ct. 8, C. D. 1180), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Before the Second Division,

September 30, 1954

No. 58404.

protests 139686-K, etc. (New York).

#### J. Katz Floor Coverings, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is similar in all material respects to the linoleum the subject of *United States*v. *Pacific Overseas Co., W. J. Byrnes & Co.*(42 C. C. P. A. 1, C. A. D. 559), the claims of the plaintiff were sustained.
Qrrcse:

IPAC Operational Metrics for December 2020

Volume by Transaction Type

Dollar Amount] ‘3 of Total Dollar Amount] ‘Number of Transactions] _% of Total Number of Transactions|

Fiduciary (investment & Borrowing) 19,101,923,745,706| 99.77%] 19,209] 17.19%]

Buy/Sell 34,251,304,077| 0.18%] 91,227] 81.62%

Benefits (RITS) 10,039,017,691| 0.05%] EEE) 0.35%]

[Check Aftermath (TRACS) 220,814,138] 0.00%] 336] 0.8086]

Zero Dollar ol 0.00% | 0.00%

[Grand Total - December 2020 19,186 434,881,612| 100.00%| Ti 765| 100.0%

[Grand Total - November 2020 16,446 447,003,921| 100.00%| 105,540] 100.00%|
[November to December Change 2.699,987,877,691| 6.225]
Percentage Change 16.8% 5.9%
[Grand Total - December 2019 106,364]
[Dec 2019 to Dec 2020 Change EX 4.801|
7.0% 45%
No. 53930.

#### Eugene B. Baehr & Sons *v.*United States,

protest 144338-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.
H. Res. 8 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 3, 2017. 

Resolved, That pursuant to the Legislative Pay Act of 

1929, as amended, the six minority employees authorized 

therein shall be the following named persons, effective January 3, 2017, until otherwise ordered by the House, to-wit: 

Nadeam Elshami, George Kundanis, Diane Dewhirst, Richard Meltzer, Wyndee Parker, and Drew Hammill, each to receive gross compensation pursuant to the provisions of House 

Resolution 119, Ninety-fifth Congress, as enacted into permanent law by section 115 of Public Law 95–94. In addition, 

the Minority Leader may appoint and set the annual rate of 

pay for up to 3 further minority employees. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
# C_2015089EN.01003701.xml

| 16.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 89/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 89/37

---

Action brought on 22 January 2015 — GRE v OHIM (Mark1)

(Case T-32/15)

(2015/C 089/44)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: GRE Grand River Enterprises Deutschland GmbH (Kloster Lehnin, Germany) (represented by: I. Memmler and S. Schulz, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘Mark1’ — Application No 1 2 0 52  437

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 29 October 2014 in Case R 647/2014-1

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
No. 48418.

#### Protest 73457-K of General Dyestuff Corp. (New York).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise in question is not one of the products described in section 701, Revenue Act of 1936 (26 U. S. C. 1934 ed., §999a) or in section 2491 of the Internal Revenue Code (26 U. S. C. 1940 ed., §2491). In accordance therewith the protest was sustained as to this claim.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 870 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 870

 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives with respect to 
 the Special Counsel assigned to investigate Russian interference with 
   the 2016 Presidential election and related matters, and for other 
                               purposes.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 3, 2018

 Mr. Rokita submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
                     the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives with respect to 
 the Special Counsel assigned to investigate Russian interference with 
   the 2016 Presidential election and related matters, and for other 
                               purposes.

Whereas Robert Mueller III has served as the Special Counsel assigned to 
        investigate Russian interference with the 2016 Presidential election and 
        related matters since May 17, 2017;
Whereas the expenses associated with this investigation were $6.7 million in its 
        first five months;
Whereas at the established rate of spending, the investigation has likely cost 
        the American taxpayers over $17 million;
Whereas the matter of potential interference in elections by the Russian 
        Federation has been investigated before and during the same time by 
        other authorized powers including the Department of Justice, American 
        intelligence agencies, and committees of both the House of 
        Representatives and the Senate;
Whereas no sanctioned investigation has found evidence of collusion between the 
        2016 Presidential campaign of Donald J. Trump and the Russian 
        Federation;
Whereas no charges presently introduced by Robert Mueller III have been related 
        to collusion between a political campaign and a foreign government; and
Whereas a failure to resolve this investigation swiftly and accurately threatens 
        to question the legitimacy of future elections held in the United 
        States: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) expresses the need for a swift resolution into the 
        investigation by the Special Counsel into Russian interference 
        during the 2016 Presidential election and related matters to 
        preserve the integrity of our democratic institutions; and
            (2) demands that within thirty days of the adoption of this 
        resolution, the investigation be concluded or the Special 
        Counsel should report to the House on the status of the 
        investigation with an anticipated date of conclusion of the 
        investigation to ensure that the legitimacy of future elections 
        is not questioned.
                                 <all>
```
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

Respondent

v.

DALE ROBERT STONEROAD,

Petitioner :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: No. 158 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 14th day of August, 2019

, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED

.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1049 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1049

  To allow the Secretary of Health and Human Services to require that 
  risk evaluation and mitigation strategies for certain drugs include 
communication plans that provide information about drug formulations or 
               properties described in the drug labeling.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 4, 2017

 Ms. Hassan (for herself and Mr. Young) introduced the following bill; 
     which was read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, 
                     Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To allow the Secretary of Health and Human Services to require that 
  risk evaluation and mitigation strategies for certain drugs include 
communication plans that provide information about drug formulations or 
               properties described in the drug labeling.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Opioid Addiction Risk Transparency 
Act''.

SEC. 2. REMS COMMUNICATION PLANS.

    Section 505-1(e)(3) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 
U.S.C. 355-1(e)(3)) is amended--
            (1) in subparagraph (B), by striking ``; or'';
            (2) in subparagraph (C), by striking the period and 
        inserting ``; or''; and
            (3) by adding at the end the following:
                    ``(D) disseminating information to health care 
                providers about the meaning of terms related to drug 
                formulations or properties that are described in the 
                drug labeling, including information about the 
                limitations or patient care implications of such 
                formulations or properties, and how such formulations 
                or properties may be related to serious adverse drug 
                events associated with use of the drug.''.
                                 <all>
```
Case 2:04-cv-02012-LP Document 1 Filed 05/10/04 Page 1 of 12
Case 2:04-cv-02012-LP Document 1 Filed 05/10/04 Page 2 of 12
Case 2:04-cv-02012-LP Document 1 Filed 05/10/04 Page 3 of 12
Case 2:04-cv-02012-LP Document 1 Filed 05/10/04 Page 4 of 12
Case 2:04-cv-02012-LP Document 1 Filed 05/10/04 Page 5 of 12
Case 2:04-cv-02012-LP Document 1 Filed 05/10/04 Page 6 of 12
Case 2:04-cv-02012-LP Document 1 Filed 05/10/04 Page 7 of 12
Case 2:04-cv-02012-LP Document 1 Filed 05/10/04 Page 8 of 12
Case 2:04-cv-02012-LP Document 1 Filed 05/10/04 Page 9 of 12
Case 2:04-cv-02012-LP Document 1 Filed 05/10/04 Page 10 of 12
Case 2:04-cv-02012-LP Document 1 Filed 05/10/04 Page 11 of 12
Case 2:04-cv-02012-LP Document 1 Filed 05/10/04 Page 12 of 12
# United States Court **of Appeals**  **f or the Fifth Circuit** 

**____________** No. 22

- 40828 Summary Calendar

**____________ United States of America,**  Plaintiff

— Appellee **,**

versus **Brian Edwards,** Defendant

— Appellant

**.**

**______________________________** Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:22

- CR

- 62

- 1

**________________________ ______**  Before **Higginbotham, Stewart,** and **Southwick,** Circuit Judges

**. Per Curiam**  **:** *****
Brian Edwards entered a conditional guilty plea to possession with the intent to distribute 50 grams or more of methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(B), reserving the right to appeal the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress the evidence. He was sentenced to

a n 87

- month term of imprisonment, followed by a four

- year term of

**_____________________**

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See **5th Cir**

**. R** 

**.** 47.5. 4. United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

### FILED December 14, 2023 Lyle W. Cayce Clerk Case: 22-40828 Document: 00517001952 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/14/2023No. 22

- 40828

2 su pervised release. On appeal, he argues that the police officer who arrested him did not have probable cause to do so . Therefore, the following search that discovered methamphetamine in Edwards’ s pocket was not justified as incidental to the arrest

. When reviewing a district court’s ruling on a motion to suppress, we review factual findings for clear error and legal conclusions de novo , viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prevailing party

. United Stat es v. Cervantes , 797 F.3d 326, 328 (5th Cir. 2015)

. T he denial of a motion to suppress should be upheld “if there is any reasonable view of the evidence to support it.” United States v. Michelletti , 13 F.3d 838, 841 (5th Cir. 1994) (en banc) (quotation m arks and citation omitted).
A s found by the district court , the officer had probable cause to arrest Edwards. T he suspicion required for probable cause “ need not reach the fifty percent mark.” Scott v. City of Mandeville , 69 F.4th 249, 255 (5th Cir. 20 23) (quotation marks and citation omitted). Given the “ totality of facts and circumstances within [the] police officer’s knowledge at the moment of
arrest , ” a reasonable person could have “ conclude [d] that the suspect had committed or was committing an of fense.” United States v. Wadley , 59 F.3d 510, 512 (5th Cir. 1995) ; see also District of Columbia v. Wesby , 583 U.S. 48, 61 (2018)

. Additionally, the search did not exceed the parameters of a valid search incident to arrest. Arizona v. Gant , 556 U.S. 332 , 338 (2009).
**AFFIRMED**

. Case: 22-40828 Document: 00517001952 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/14/2023