76732 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 214 / Tuesday, November 7, 2023 / Notices 

1See Wooden Cabinets and Vanities and 

Components Thereof from the People’s Republic of 

China: Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Review, Rescission of 

Administrative Review in Part, and Intent To 

Rescind in Part; 2021, 88 FR 29084 (May 5, 2023) 

(Preliminary Results), and accompanying 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Review of 

Wooden Cabinets and Vanities and Components 

Thereof from the People’s Republic of China; 2021,’’ 

dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, 

this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 

3See Certain Corrosion Inhibitors from the 

People’s Republic of China: Antidumping Duty and 

Countervailing Duty Orders, 86 FR 14869 (March 

19, 2021) (Order). 

4See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act 

regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) 

of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of 

the Act regarding specificity. 

5See, e.g., Lightweight Thermal Paper from the 

People’s Republic of China: Notice of Rescission of 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2015, 

82 FR 14349 (March 20, 2017); and Circular Welded 

Carbon Quality Steel Pipe from the People’s 

Republic of China: Rescission of Countervailing 

Duty Administrative Review; 2017, 84 FR 14650 

(April 11, 2019). 

6See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(2). 

7See 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3). 

6. Linshu Meibang Furniture Co., Ltd. 

7. Shanghai Zifeng Industries Development 

Co., Ltd. 

8. Shenzhen Pengchengzhirong Trade Co., 

Ltd. 

9. Weihai Jarlin Cabinetry Manufacture Co., 

Ltd. 

10. Xiamen Got Cheer Co., Ltd. 

11. Yindu Kitchen Equipment Co., Ltd. 

12. Zaozhuang New Sharp Import & Export 

Trading Co., Ltd. 

13. ZBOM Cabinets Co., Ltd. 

14. Zhongshan KM Cabinetry Co., Ltd. 

[FR Doc. 2023–24602 Filed 11–6–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–570–107] 

Wooden Cabinets and Vanities and 

Components Thereof From the 

People’s Republic of China: Final 

Results and Partial Recission of 

Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Review; 2021 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) determines that 

countervailable subsidies were provided 

to certain producers and exporters of 

wooden cabinets and vanities and 

components thereof (wooden cabinets) 

from the People’s Republic of China 

(China) during the period of review 

(POR) January 1, 2021, through 

December 31, 2021. Commerce is also 

rescinding the review with respect to 

five companies. 

DATES: Applicable November 7, 2023. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Michael Romani or Richard Roberts, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office I, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC, 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0198 or 

(202) 482–3464, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

Commerce published the Preliminary 

Results of this administrative review in 

the Federal Register on May 5, 2023, 

and invited interested parties to 

comment.1 For a complete description 

of the events that occurred subsequent 

to the Preliminary Results, see the Issues 

and Decision Memorandum.2

Scope of the Order 3

The products covered by the scope of 

the Order are wooden cabinets from 

China. A full description of the scope of 

the Order is contained in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised by the interested 

parties in their case and rebuttal briefs 

are addressed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. A list of topics discussed 

in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is provided in the 

appendix to this notice. The Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at https://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at https://access.trade.gov/public/ 

FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on our analysis of comments 

from interested parties and the evidence 

on the record, we revised the 

calculation of the net countervailable 

subsidy rates for Fujian Dushi Wooden 

Industry Co. (Dushi) and Jiangsu 

Sunwell Cabinetry Co., Ltd. (Sunwell). 

For a discussion of the issues, see the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum. 

Methodology 

Commerce conducted this 

administrative review in accordance 

with section 751(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For 

each of the subsidy programs found to 

be countervailable, we find that there is 

a subsidy, i.e., a government-provided 

financial contribution that gives rise to 

a benefit to the recipient, and that the 

subsidy is specific.4 For a complete 

description of the methodology 

underlying all of Commerce’s 

conclusions, including our reliance, in 

part, on facts otherwise available, 

including adverse facts available, 

pursuant to sections 776(a) and (b) of 

the Act, see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. 

Partial Rescission of Review 

Commerce’s practice is to rescind an 

administrative review of a 

countervailing duty order, pursuant to 

19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), when there are no 

reviewable entries of subject 

merchandise during the POR for which 

liquidation is suspended.5 Normally, 

upon completion of an administrative 

review, the suspended entries are 

liquidated at the countervailing duty 

assessment rate calculated for the 

review period.6 Therefore, for an 

administrative review of a company to 

be conducted, there must be a 

reviewable, suspended entry that 

Commerce can instruct U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection (CBP) to liquidate 

at the calculated countervailing duty 

assessment rate calculated for the 

review period.7

We find five companies subject to this 

review: (1) Shouguang Fushi Wood Co., 

Ltd..; (2) Taizhou Overseas Int’l Ltd.; (3) 

Yixing Pengjia Technology Co., Ltd.; (4) 

Zaozhuang New Sharp Import & Export 

Trading Co., Ltd..; and (5) Zhoushan 

For-strong Wood Co., Ltd. did not have 

reviewable entries of subject 

merchandise for which liquidation is 

suspended. Because there is no 

evidence on the record that these five 

companies had entries, exports, or sales 

of subject merchandise during the POR, 

we are rescinding this review with 

respect to these five companies 

consistent with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3). 

Companies Not Selected for Individual 

Review 

The statute and Commerce’s 

regulations do not address the 

establishment of a rate to be applied to 

companies not selected for individual 

examination when Commerce limits its 

examination in an administrative review 

pursuant to section 777A(e)(2) of the 

Act. However, Commerce normally 

determines the rates for non-selected 

companies in reviews in a manner that 

is consistent with section 705(c)(5) of 

the Act, which provides the basis for 

calculating the all-others rate in an 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 214 / Tuesday, November 7, 2023 / Notices 76733 

8With two respondents under examination, 

Commerce normally calculates: (A) a weightedaverage of the estimated subsidy rates calculated for 

the examined respondents; (B) a simple average of 

the estimated subsidy rates calculated for the 

examined respondents; and (C) a weighted average 

of the estimated subsidy rates calculated for the 

examined respondents using each company’s 

publicly-ranged U.S. sale quantities for the 

merchandise under consideration. Commerce then 

compares (B) and (C) to (A) and selects the rate 

closest to (A) as the most appropriate rate for all 

other producers and exporters. See, e.g., Ball 

Bearings and Parts Thereof from France, Germany, 

Italy, Japan, and the United Kingdom: Final Results 

of Antidumping Duty Administrative Reviews, Final 

Results of Changed-Circumstances Review, and 

Revocation of an Order in Part, 75 FR 53661, 53663 

(September 1, 2010). 

9Commerce finds the following companies to be 

cross-owned with Sunwell: Shanghai Beautystar 

Cabinetry Co., Ltd. 10This rate is based on the rate for the respondent 

that was selected for individual review, excluding 

rates that are zero, de minimis, or based entirely on 

facts available. See section 735(c)(5)(A) of the Act. 11See Issues and Decision Memorandum at 

Comment 1. 12 Id. 

investigation. Section 705(c)(5)(A)(i) of 

the Act instructs Commerce, as a general 

rule, to calculate the all-others rate 

equal to the weighted average of the 

countervailable subsidy rates 

established for exporters and producers 

individually investigated, excluding any 

zero or de minimis countervailable 

subsidy rates, and any rates determined 

entirely on the basis of facts available. 

There are eight companies for which 

a review was requested and not 

rescinded, and which were not selected 

as mandatory respondents or found to 

be cross-owned with a mandatory 

respondent. In this review, the rates for 

Dushi and Sunwell were above de 

minimis and not based entirely on facts 

available. Therefore, we are applying to 

the non-selected companies the average 

of the net subsidy rates calculated for 

Dushi and Sunwell, which we 

calculated using publicly-ranged sales 

data submitted by Dushi and Sunwell.8

This is the same methodology 

Commerce applied in the Preliminary 

Results for determining a rate for 

companies not selected for individual 

examination. However, due to changes 

in the subsidy rate calculations for 

Dushi and Sunwell, we revised the nonselected rate accordingly. Consequently, 

for the eight non-selected companies for 

which a review was requested and not 

rescinded, we are applying an ad 

valorem subsidy rate of 13.63 percent 

for 2021. 

Final Results of Review 

We determine the following net 

countervailable subsidy rates exist for 

the period January 1, 2021, through 

December 31, 2021: 

Company 

Subsidy rate— 

2021 

(percent ad 

valorem) 

Fujian Dushi Wooden Industry Co ................................ 16.13 

Jiangsu Sunwell Cabinetry 

Co., Ltd 9 ........................... 7.54 

Company 

Subsidy rate— 

2021 

(percent ad 

valorem) 

Review-Specific Average Rate Applicable 

to the Following Companies 10

KM Cabinetry Co, Ltd ........... 13.63 

Nantong Aershin Cabinet 

Co., Ltd ............................. 13.63 

Shanghai Zifeng International 

Trading Co., Ltd 11 ............ 13.63 

Sheen Lead International 

Trading (Shanghai) Co., 

Ltd 12 ................................. 13.63 

Taishan Oversea Trading 

Company Ltd ..................... 13.63 

Weifang Fuxing Wood Co., 

Ltd ..................................... 13.63 

Xiamen Adler Cabinetry Co., 

Ltd ..................................... 13.63 

Yixing Pengjia Cabinetry Co., 

Ltd ..................................... 13.63 

Disclosure 

Commerce intends to disclose 

calculations and analysis performed for 

the final results of review within five 

days after the date of publication of this 

notice in the Federal Register in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

Assessment Requirements 

In accordance with section 

751(a)(2)(C) of the Act and 19 CFR 

351.212(b)(2), Commerce has 

determined, and CBP shall assess, 

countervailing duties on all appropriate 

entries covered by this review, for the 

above-listed companies at the applicable 

ad valorem assessment rates listed for 

the corresponding time periods (i.e., 

January 1, 2021, to December 31, 2021). 

Commerce intends to issue assessment 

instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 

days after publication of the final results 

of this review in the Federal Register. 

If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

In accordance with section 751(a)(1) 

of the Act, Commerce also intends to 

instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of 

estimated countervailing duties in the 

amounts shown above for the abovelisted companies with regard to 

shipments of subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the date of 

publication of these final results of 

review. For all non-reviewed firms, we 

will instruct CBP to continue to collect 

cash deposits of estimated 

countervailing duties at the all-others 

rate or the most recent company-specific 

rate applicable to the company, as 

appropriate. These cash deposit 

requirements, effective upon 

publication of these final results, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to parties subject to an 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

disposition of proprietary information 

disclosed under APO in accordance 

with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), which 

continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 

notification of the return or destruction 

of APO materials or conversion to 

judicial protective order, is hereby 

requested. Failure to comply with the 

regulations and terms of an APO is a 

sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

The final results are issued and 

published in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, 19 

CFR 351.213(d)(3), and 19 CFR 

351.221(b)(5). 

Dated: November 1, 2023. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Partial Rescission of Administrative 

Review 

V. Non-Selected Rate 

VI. Subsidies Valuation 

VII. Interest Rate Benchmarks, Input, 

Electricity, and Land Benchmarks 

VIII. Use of Facts Otherwise Available and 

Application of Adverse Inferences 

IX. Analysis of Programs 

X. Discussion of the Issues 

Comment 1: Whether Commerce Should 

Rescind the Review for Sheen Lead 

International Trading (Shanghai) Co., 

Ltd. (Sheen Lead) or Shanghai Zifeng 

International Trading Co., Ltd. (Shanghai 

Zifeng) 

Comment 2: Whether Commerce Should 

Apply Adverse Facts Available (AFA) to 

the Export Buyer’s Credit (EBC) Program 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
76734 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 214 / Tuesday, November 7, 2023 / Notices 

1See Certain Aluminum Foil from the People’s 

Republic of China: Preliminary Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, Partial 

Rescission of Antidumping Administrative Review, 

and Preliminary Determination of No Shipments; 

2021–2022, 88 FR 29092 (May 5, 2023) (Preliminary 

Results) and accompanying Preliminary Decision 

Memorandum (PDM). 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for 

Final Results of 2021–2022 Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review,’’ dated August 28, 2023. 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2021– 

2022 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of 

Certain Aluminum Foil from the People’s Republic 

of China;’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby 

adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum). 

4See Certain Aluminum Foil from the People’s 

Republic of China: Amended Final Determination 

of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and Antidumping 

Duty Order, 83 FR 17362 (April 19, 2018) (Order). 

5See appendix. 

6 In the Preliminary Results we inadvertently 

omitted identifying Jiangsu Dingsheng New 

Materials Joint-Stock Co., Ltd. as part of the 

Dingsheng entity, which we have corrected for 

these final results. See Preliminary Results, 88 FR 

at 29092–93. 

7 Id., 88 FR at 29093. 

8See Non-Market Economy Antidumping 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 

FR 65694 (October 24, 2011) (Assessment Practice 

Refinement). 

9Consistent with a prior segment of this 

proceeding, we have continued to find that Jiangsu 

Dingsheng New Materials Joint-Stock Co., Ltd.; 

Dingsheng Aluminium Industries (Hong Kong) 

Trading Co., Limited (Dingsheng Aluminium 

Industries (Hong Kong) Trading Co., Ltd.); 

Hangzhou Dingsheng Import&Export Co., Ltd. 

(Hangzhou Dingsheng Import and Export Co., Ltd.); 

Hangzhou Five Star Aluminium Co., Ltd.; 

Hangzhou Teemful Aluminium Co., Ltd.; Inner 

Mongolia Liansheng New Energy Material Co.; and 

Inner Mongolia Xinxing New Energy Material Co., 

Ltd. are affiliated entities, pursuant to sections 

771(33)(E), (F), and (G) of the Act, and that they 

should be treated as a single entity pursuant to 19 

CFR 351.401(f)(1)–(2). See Antidumping Duty 

Investigation of Certain Aluminum Foil from the 

People’s Republic of China: Affirmative Preliminary 

Determination of Sales at Less Than Fair Value and 

Postponement of Final Determination and 

Accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum, 

82 FR 50858 (November 2, 2017), and 

accompanying PDM at 16–18, unchanged in Certain 

Aluminum Foil from the People’s Republic of 

Comment 3: Whether Commerce Should 

Include Petitioner’s Density Benchmark 

Data to Measure the Adequacy of 

Remuneration for the Provision of Sawn 

Wood and Fiberboard 

Comment 4: Whether Commerce Should 

Apply AFA to the Provision of 

Electricity for Less Than Adequate 

Remuneration (LTAR) 

Comment 5: Whether Commerce Should 

Continue to Countervail the Provision of 

Certain Inputs for LTAR Based on AFA 

Comment 6: Whether Commerce Should 

Use a Free-On-Board (FOB) Sales 

Denominator 

Comment 7: Whether Commerce Should 

Change Benchmarks Used to Measure the 

Benefit for Certain Policy Loans 

Received by Fujian Dushi Wooden 

Industry Company (Dushi) 

Comment 8: Whether Commerce Should 

Calculate All Benefits under the 

Provision of Electricity for LTAR 

Comment 9: Whether Commerce Should 

Adjust Certain Sales Denominators to 

Conduct the 0.5% Test for ‘‘Other 

Subsidies’’ Received by Dushi 

Comment 10: Whether Commerce Should 

Correct Errors in the Calculations Used 

to Measure the Adequacy of 

Remuneration from the Provision of 

Certain Inputs 

Comment 11: Whether Commerce Should 

Adjust the Calculation of Benchmark 

Interest Applied to Jiangsu Sunwell 

Cabinetry Co., Ltd.’s (Sunwell) Loans 

Comment 12: Whether Commerce Should 

Adjust the Benefit Calculation for the 

Provision of Electricity for LTAR 

Program for Sunwell 

XI. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2023–24582 Filed 11–6–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–053] 

Certain Aluminum Foil From People’s 

Republic of China: Final Results of 

Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review and Final Determination of No 

Shipments; 2021–2022 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) determines that 

certain companies under review sold 

certain aluminum foil (aluminum foil) 

from the People’s Republic of China 

(China) at less than normal value during 

the period of review (POR) April 1, 

2021, through March 31, 2022. 

DATES: Applicable November 7, 2023. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Michael J. Heaney, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office VI, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4475. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On May 5, 2023, Commerce published 

the Preliminary Results and invited 

interested parties to comment.1 On 

August 28, 2023, we extended the 

deadline for these final results until 

November 1, 2023.2 For a full summary 

of the events that occurred since 

Commerce published the Preliminary 

Results, see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.3 Commerce conducted 

this review in accordance with section 

751(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as 

amended (the Act). 

Scope of the Order 4

The merchandise covered by the 

Order is certain aluminum foil from 

China. For a complete description of the 

scope of the Order, see the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case and 

rebuttal briefs are addressed in the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum and 

are listed in the appendix to this 

notice.5 The Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is a public document and 

is on file electronically via Enforcement 

and Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be found at 

https://access.trade.gov/public/ 

FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Changes From the Preliminary Results 

Based on our analysis of the 

comments received from interested 

parties, we made certain changes to the 

margin calculations for Jiangsu 

Dingsheng New Materials Joint-Stock 

Co., Ltd.; Dingsheng Aluminium 

Industries (Hong Kong) Trading Co., 

Limited (Dingsheng Aluminium 

Industries (Hong Kong) Trading Co., 

Ltd.); Hangzhou Dingsheng Import & 

Export Co., Ltd. (Hangzhou Dingsheng 

Import and Export Co., Ltd.); Hangzhou 

Five Star Aluminium Co., Ltd.; 

Hangzhou Teemful Aluminium Co., 

Ltd.; Inner Mongolia Liansheng New 

Energy Material Co., Ltd.; and Inner 

Mongolia Xinxing New Energy Material 

Co., Ltd. (collectively, Dingsheng).6 For 

a discussion of these changes, see the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum. 

Final Determination of No Shipments 

In the Preliminary Results, we 

preliminarily determined that Shanghai 

Shenyan Packaging Materials JointStock Co., Ltd. (Shanghai Shenyan) had 

no shipments of subject merchandise 

during the POR. We received no 

information to contradict this 

determination.7 Therefore, we continue 

to find that Shanghai Shenyan had no 

shipments of subject merchandise 

during the POR and will issue 

appropriate liquidation instructions that 

are consistent with our ‘‘automatic 

assessment’’ clarification for these final 

results.8

Separate Rates 

In the Preliminary Results, we 

determined that the Dingsheng single 

entity 9 was eligible for a separate rate, 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES