alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**     I, Wayne W. Byers, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of ebank Financial Services, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;     4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter(the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting;     5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small businessissuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.     Date: August 9, 2005      By: /s/ Wayne W. Byers         Wayne W. Byers, Chief Financial Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 349 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. CON. RES. 349

Commending the member states of the United Nations Western European and 
    Others Group for addressing over four decades of injustice and 
 extending temporary membership in that regional bloc to the state of 
                                Israel.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              June 8, 2000

   Mr. Crowley (for himself and Mr. Rothman) submitted the following 
     concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on 
                        International Relations

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Commending the member states of the United Nations Western European and 
    Others Group for addressing over four decades of injustice and 
 extending temporary membership in that regional bloc to the state of 
                                Israel.

Whereas Israel has played an active role in the international community and 
        within the United Nations;
Whereas in order to be a fully participating member of the United Nations 
        countries must serve in a regional group;
Whereas members of regional groups select member states on a rotating basis to 
        serve on important United Nations bodies such as the Security Council 
        and the Economic and Social Council;
Whereas Israel has been denied an opportunity to serve in the Asian States Group 
        at the United Nations, even though it geographically belongs in that 
        bloc;
Whereas the Western European And Others Group (WEOG) at the United Nations 
        consists of Western European nations, the United States, Canada, New 
        Zealand, Turkey, and Australia and is the only group at the United 
        Nations that is not geographically based;
Whereas Israel was offered membership in the WEOG regional bloc at the United 
        Nations on Friday, May 26, 2000, by the chairman of WEOG at the time, 
        Ambassador Peter van Walsum of the Netherlands;
Whereas that offer was officially accepted by Israeli officials on Sunday, May 
        28, 2000; and
Whereas Israel is a democracy and an ally and friend to the United States: Now, 
        therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That the Congress--
            (1) commends the Western European and Others Group (WEOG) 
        members for extending temporary membership to Israel;
            (2) congratulates Israel on its new-found role in the 
        United Nations;
            (3) reaffirms Israel's right to be a full participating 
        member and equal partner in the United Nations; and
            (4) urges the members of WEOG to extend full and permanent 
        membership to Israel, without conditions, until such time as 
        Israel can serve as an effective member of the Asian States 
        Group.
                                 <all>
```
Case No. 14,339.

#### UNDERWOOD v. HUDDLESTONE.

[2 Cranch, C. C. 76.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

June Term, 1813.

Evidence — Whitten Notice — Notice to Peoduce.

The contents of a written notiee cannot be given in evidence, unless notice has been given to the party to produce it.

[Cited in Bank of Washington v. Kurtz, Case No. 950.]

[See Case No. 14,340.]

Assumpsit against the indorser of.Roddy’s note. The notary testified that he gave no-tiee by letter.

Mr. Law, for defendant,

objected to evidence of its contents, because the defendant had not been called upon to produce the letter, and cited Chitty, 210; 1 Peake, Ev. 112; 2 Peake, Ev. 221; 7 East, 385; Shaw v. Markham, Peake, 165.

Mr. Jones, contra.

The practice has always been otherwise. Saunderson v. Judge, 2 H. Bl. 509.

THE COURT

(nem. con.) refused to permit evidence to be given of the contents of the letter, because the plaintiff had not given notice to the defendant to produce it before the trial, and refused to allow the plaintiff now to give the notice.

Verdict for the defendant.

New trial granted on payment of costs; Bank of Washington v. Kurtz [Case No. 950].
# C_2015320EN.01004801.xml

| 28.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 320/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 320/48

---

Action brought on 10 August 2015 — Vitra Collections v OHIM — Consorzio Origini (Shape of a chair)

(Case T-455/15)

(2015/C 320/66)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Vitra Collections AG (Muttenz, Switzerland) (represented by: V. von Bomhard, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Consorzio Origini (Florence, Italy)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: Community tridimensional mark (Shape of a chair) — Community trade mark No 182 451

Trade mark at issue: C

Procedure before OHIM: Cancellation proceedings

Procedure before OHIM:

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 18 March 2015 in Case R 664/2011-5

Contested decision:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order OHIM and the intervener to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM and the intervener to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 75, second sentence, of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 75, second sentence, of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(e)(iii) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(e)(iii) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

: CIVIL ACTION NOS.

:

TAYLOR : 02-3877

JACKSON : 02-3879

LIAGA, et al. : 02-3920

KARGE, et al. : 02-3927

GREEN, et al. : 02-3942

MARKS : 02-3969

FULTZ : 02-3977

RACKLEY : 02-4118

THOMPSON, et al. : 02-4125

RUSSELL, et al. : 02-4127

ALCALA : 02-4131

ANDERSON : 02-4193

CAGAPE, et al. : 02-4227

MONZON, et al. : 02-4241

SANDOVAL, et al. : 02-4282

CHAPMAN, et al. : 02-4289

DUNHAM, et al. : 02-4304

FORTUNATO, et al. : 02-4315

:

VS. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION, et al. :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of July, 2002, the Court having been previously

advised that the above action cannot proceed to trial and disposition because of the following

reason:

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending disposition of a related

action.

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending determination of

arbitration proceedings.

[ ] - Interlocutory appeal filed.

[ X ] - Other: Case is placed into suspense pending receipt of the Case

Transfer Order from the Judicial Panel on Multi District Litigation

transferring case to District of Minnesota.

Case 2:02-cv-04118-JCJ Document 2 Filed 07/10/2002 Page 1 of 2
It is

ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this action closed for statistical purposes and

place the matter in the Civil Suspense File, and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction; and that the case be

restored to the trial docket when the action is in a status so that it may proceed to final

disposition; this order shall not prejudice the rights of the parties to this litigation.

BY THE COURT:

________________________________________

J. Curtis Joyner, Judge

Case 2:02-cv-04118-JCJ Document 2 Filed 07/10/2002 Page 2 of 2
No. 65408.

#### Davies, Turner & Company et al. *v.*United States,

protests 58/7707, etc. (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of brass water mixers similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Davies, Turner & Company*v. *United States*(47 C.C.P.A. 129, C.A.D. 744), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
## Breadcrumb

-  National Minerals Information Center 

#           Lithium Statistics and Information      

      By National Minerals Information Center

-  Home 
-  Commodities 
-  Countries 
-  Materials Flow 
-  US States 
-  NMIC Seminars 
-  Data 
-  Multimedia 
-  Publications 
-  News 
-  Connect 
-  About 

Statistics and information on the worldwide supply of, demand for, and flow of the mineral commodity*lithium* 

***Subscribe**** to receive an email notification when a new publication is added to this page. On the Questions tab of the subscriber preferences page, select "Lithium" and any other options in which you may be interested. Please see the ****list services**** page for more information.*

### **Annual Publications**

Mineral Commodity Summaries
                            - Lithium    PDF Format:       |  1996  |  1997  |  1998  |  1999  |  2000  |  2001  |  2002  |  2003  |  2004  |  2005  |  2006  |  2007  |  2008  |  2009  |  2010  |  2011  |  2012  | 2013  | 2014  | 2015  | 2016  | 2017  | 2018  |  2019  |  2020  |  2021  |  2022**** |  2023  |  **2024**  |
                            - Appendixes

Minerals Yearbook
                            - Lithium    PDF Format:       |  1994  |  1995  |  1996  |  1997  |  1998  |  1999  |  2000  |  2001  |  2002  |  2003  |  2004  |  2005  |  2006  |  2007  |  2008  |  2009  |  2010  |  2011  |  2012  |  2013  |  2014  |  2015  |  2016  |  2017  |  2018  |  2019  |  **2020**  |    XLS Format:       |  2002  |  2003  |  2004  |  2005  |  2006  |  2007  |  2008  |  2009  |  2010  |  2011  |  2012  |  2013  |  2014  |  2015  |  2016  |  2017  |  2018  |  2019  |  **2020**  |  2021 tables-only release  |  **2022 tables-only release**  |
                            - Archive       |  1932-1993  |

### **Special Publications**

                            - Critical Mineral Resources of the United States--Economic and Environmental Geology and Prospects for Future Supply  Professional Paper 1802                               - Lithium 
                            - Critical Minerals Review 2021
                            - Historical Statistics for Mineral and Material Commodities in the United States  Data Series 140                               - Lithium 
                            - Lithium--For Harnessing Renewable Energy  Fact Sheet 2014-3035
                            - Lithium use in batteries  Circular 1371
                            - Material Use in the United States-Selected Case Studies for Cadmium, Cobalt, Lithium, and Nickel in Rechargeable Batteries  Scientific Investigations Report 2008-5141
                            - Metal Prices in the United States through 2010  Scientific Investigations Report 2012-5188
                            - Review of selected global mineral industries in 2011 and an outlook to 2017   Open-File Report 2013-1091
                            - U.S. Mineral Dependence-Statistical Compilation of U.S. and World Mineral Production, Consumption, and Trade, 1990-2010  Open-File Report 2013-1184

### Contacts

#### Brian Jaskula

##### Mineral Commodity Specialist

National Minerals Information Center

bjaskula@usgs.gov

703-648-4908
No. 56324.

protests 176879-K, etc. (New York).

#### Fleming-Joffe, Ltd., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 98 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 98

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      February 7, 2017.
    Resolved, That the following named Member be, and is hereby, ranked as 
follows on the following standing committee of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on the Budget: Mr. Higgins of New York (to rank immediately after 
Mr. Jeffries).
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
# C_2016038EN.01007302.xml

| 1.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/73 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/73

---

Action brought on 30 November 2015 — Pharm-a-care Laboratories v OHIM — Pharmavite (VITAMELTS)

(Case T-713/15)

(2016/C 038/99)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Pharm-a-care Laboratories Pty. Ltd (Sydney, Australia) (represented by: I. De Freitas, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Pharmavite LLC (California, United States)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘VITAMELTS’ — Community trade mark No 11 403 581

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

Procedure before OHIM

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 10 September 2015 in Case R 2649/2014-1

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | confirm the decision of the Cancellation Division in its entirety so that Application for Revocation No. 8627 C is rejected; |
| --- | --- |

—

confirm the decision of the Cancellation Division in its entirety so that Application for Revocation No. 8627 C is rejected;

| — | order OHIM and Pharmavite LLC to pay the Appellant’s costs in relation to these proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM and Pharmavite LLC to pay the Appellant’s costs in relation to these proceedings.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | The Board of Appeal infringed Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. It erred in law in finding that the Appellant has acted in bad faith when filing the application for registration of the contested trade mark; |
| --- | --- |

—

The Board of Appeal infringed Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. It erred in law in finding that the Appellant has acted in bad faith when filing the application for registration of the contested trade mark;

| — | The Board of Appeal’s decision is based, in part, on an infringement of an essential procedural requirement, namely the failure to provide the Appellant with an opportunity to respond to evidence submitted by the Cancellation Applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

The Board of Appeal’s decision is based, in part, on an infringement of an essential procedural requirement, namely the failure to provide the Appellant with an opportunity to respond to evidence submitted by the Cancellation Applicant.

---
H. J. Res. 86

One Hundred Sixth Congress

of the

United States of America

AT THE SECOND SESSION

Begun and held at the City of Washington on Monday,

the twenty-fourth day of January, two thousand

Joint Resolution

Recognizing the 50th anniversary of the Korean War and the service by members

of the Armed Forces during such war, and for other purposes.

Whereas on June 25, 1950, Communist North Korea invaded South

Korea with approximately 90,000 troops, thereby initiating the

Korean War;

Whereas on June 27, 1950, President Harry S Truman ordered

military intervention in Korea;

Whereas approximately 5,720,000 members of the Armed Forces

served during the Korean War to defeat the spread of communism

in Korea and throughout the world;

Whereas casualties of the United States during the Korean War

included 54,260 dead (of whom 33,665 were battle deaths), 92,134

wounded, and 8,176 listed as missing in action or prisoners of

war; and

Whereas service by members of the Armed Forces in the Korean

War should never be forgotten: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the

United States of America in Congress assembled, That the

Congress—

(1) recognizes the historic significance of the 50th anniversary of the Korean War;

(2) expresses the gratitude of the people of the United

States to the members of the Armed Forces who served in

the Korean War;

(3) honors the memory of service members who paid the

ultimate price for the cause of freedom, including those who

remain unaccounted for; and

(4) calls upon the President to issue a proclamation—

(A) recognizing the 50th anniversary of the Korean

War and the sacrifices of the members of the Armed Forces

who served and fought in Korea to defeat the spread of

communism; and
H. J. Res. 86—2

(B) calling upon the people of the United States to

observe such anniversary with appropriate ceremonies and

activities.

Speaker of the House of Representatives.

Vice President of the United States and

President of the Senate.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

BMG MUSIC, et al. : CIVIL ACTION

Plaintiffs : NO. 04-650

:

v. :

:

DOES 1-203, :

Defendants. :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of March, 2004, upon consideration

of Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Take Expedited Discovery (Doc.

3), it is hereby ORDERED that said Motion is GRANTED with respect

to the Defendant identified as “Doe #1.” As this Court has

severed all other Defendants, discovery issues in the other cases

will be at the discretion of other randomly assigned judges of

this Court. Plaintiffs therefore have leave to serve immediate

discovery on Comcast to obtain the identity only of the Doe

Defendant known as “Doe #1" in Exhibit A of Plaintiffs’

Complaint. The Court notes that Comcast is now, if it is not

already, on notice that it possesses documents necessary to

litigation (the subscriber data that relates individual users to

their internet protocol address), and it should act to preserve

all relevant information with an eye towards Plaintiffs’

discovery needs. This Order does not prejudice Comcast’s ability

to seek a protective order, or to take other actions as are

appropriate.

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________________________

 Clarence C. Newcomer, S.J. 

Case 2:04-cv-00650-CN Document 7 Filed 03/05/04 Page 1 of 1
Case No. 8,349.

#### LILLEY v. KELSEA.

[1 MacA. Pat. Cas. 568.]

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

Jan., 1858.

[This was an interference proceeding between Alfred T. Lilley, assignee of Samuel Porter, and H. Kelsea, assignor to himself and Henry Dunklee.]

The invention in controversy in this case is the same as that involved in the case of Hill v. Dunklee [Case No. 6,489].

[The case is not reported.]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

HAUPT, et al. : CIVIL ACTION

:

 v. :

:

THE GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY0: NO. 2-2717

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 1st day of August, it is Ordered that the Rule 16 telephone conference

in the above captioned case scheduled on August 6, 2002, has been CANCELLED until further notice

from the Court.

ATTEST: or BY THE COURT

BY: 

 Carol D. James, Deputy Clerk MARY A. McLAUGHLIN, J.

FAXED FROM CHAMBERS 8/1/02:

 Armin Feldman, Esq.

 Peter J. Deeb, Esq.

 Christine C. McGuigan, Esq.

Civ 12 (9/83)

Case 2:02-cv-02717-MAM Document 7 Filed 08/01/2002 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Shoe Pavilion, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for
the period ended September 30, 2006 (the "Report"), I, Dmitry Beinus, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the
Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to  §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934; and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

/s/Dmitry BeinusChairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
                   November 9, 2006

---