---

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549



---

FORM 10-K



---

(Mark one)

| | x | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
| | - | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006 or



| |  ̈ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
| | - | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For the transition period from
 to

Commission file number 0-49633



---

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND XIII, L.P.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



---



|                                                               |  |                                     
|-------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------
|Georgia                                                        |  | 58-2438244                          
|(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |  | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|                                                               | 
|6200 The Corners Parkway, Norcross, Georgia                    |  | 30092-3365                          
|(Address of principal executive offices)                       |  | (Zip Code)                          
|                                                               | 
|Registrants telephone number including area code              |  | (770) 449-7800                      

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:



|                    |  |                                          
|------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------
|Title of each class |  | Name of each exchange on which registered
|None                |  | None                                     

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act:



|                     |  |                    
|-------------------- |  | -------------------
|CASH PREFERRED UNITS |  | TAX PREFERRED UNITS
|(Title of class)     |  | (Title of class)   

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act.    Yes ̈No  x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange
Act.    Yes ̈No  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No ̈

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy
or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Large accelerated filer ̈Accelerated filer ̈Non-accelerated filer  x

Indicate by check mark
whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes ̈No  x



---



---

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements contained in this Form 10-K of Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P. (the Partnership) other than historical facts may be considered
forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Such statements include, in particular, statements about our plans, strategies, and
prospects and are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, as well as known and unknown risks, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected or anticipated. Therefore, such statements are not intended to be a
guarantee of our performance in future periods. Such forward-looking statements can generally be identified by our use of forward-looking terminology such as may, will, expect, intend,
anticipate, estimate, believe, continue, or other similar words. Specifically, we consider, among others, statements concerning future operating results and cash flows, our ability to meet future
obligations, and the amount and timing of any future distributions to limited partners to be forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date this
report is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We make no representations or warranties (express or implied) about the accuracy of any such forward-looking statements contained in this Form 10-K, and we do not intend to publicly update
or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.

Any such forward-looking statements are
subject to unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors and are based on a number of assumptions involving judgments with respect to, among other things, future economic, competitive, and market conditions, all of which are difficult or
impossible to predict accurately. To the extent that our assumptions differ from actual results, our ability to meet such forward-looking statements, including our ability to generate positive cash flow from operations, provide dividends to
stockholders, and maintain the value of our real estate properties, may be significantly hindered. Contained in Item 1A. are some of the risks and uncertainties, although not all risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to
differ materially from those presented in our forward-looking statements.



Page 1



---

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND XIII, L.P.

PART I



|ITEM 1. | BUSINESS.
|------- | ---------

General

Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P. (the Partnership) is a Georgia public limited partnership with Leo F. Wells, III and Wells Capital, Inc. (Wells
Capital), a Georgia corporation, serving as its general partners (collectively, the General Partners). Wells Capital is a wholly owned subsidiary of Wells Real Estate Funds, Inc. (WREF). Leo F. Wells, III is the
president and sole director of Wells Capital and the president, sole director, and sole owner of WREF. The Partnership was formed on September 15, 1998, for the purpose of acquiring, developing, owning, operating, improving, leasing, and
managing income-producing commercial properties for investment purposes. Upon subscription for units, the limited partners elected to have their units treated as Cash Preferred Units or Tax Preferred Units. Thereafter, limited partners have the
right to change their prior elections to have some or all of their units treated as Cash Preferred Units or Tax Preferred Units one time during each quarterly accounting period (conversion elections). Limited partners may vote to, among
other things: (a) amend the partnership agreement, subject to certain limitations; (b) change the business purpose or investment objectives of the Partnership; (c) add or remove a general partner; (d) elect a new general partner;
(e) dissolve the Partnership; and (f) approve a sale involving all or substantially all of the Partnerships assets, subject to certain limitations. The majority vote on any of the described matters will bind the Partnership, without
the concurrence of the General Partners. Each limited partnership unit has equal voting rights, regardless of which class of unit is selected.

On
March 29, 2001, the Partnership commenced a public offering of up to $45,000,000 of limited partnership units ($10.00 per unit) pursuant to a Registration Statement filed on Form S-11 under the Securities Act of 1933. The Partnership commenced
active operations on June 14, 2001, upon receiving and accepting subscriptions for 125,000 Units. The offering was terminated on March 28, 2003, at which time the Partnership had sold approximately 3,023,371 Cash Preferred Units and
748,678 Tax Preferred Units representing capital contributions of $37,720,487.

Operating Phases and Objectives

The Partnership typically operates in the following five life cycle phases and, during which, typically focuses on the following key operating objectives. The duration of
each phase is dependent upon various economic, industry, market, and other internal/external factors. Some overlap naturally exists in the transition from one phase to the next.



| |  |  | Fundraising phase
| | - |  | -----------------

The
period during which the Partnership is raising capital through the sale and issuance of limited partner units to the public;



| |  |  | Investing phase
| | - |  | ---------------

The
period during which the Partnership invests the capital raised during the fundraising phase, less upfront fees, into the acquisition of real estate assets;



| |  |  | Holding phase
| | - |  | -------------

The
period during which the Partnership owns and operates its real estate assets during the initial lease terms of the tenants;



| |  |  | Positioning-for-sale phase
| | - |  | --------------------------

The period during which the leases in place at the time of acquisition expire and, thus, the Partnership expends time, effort, and funds to re-lease such space to existing and/or new tenants. Following the holding phase, the Partnership
continues to own and operate the real estate assets, evaluate various options for disposition, and market the real estate assets for sale; and



Page 2



---

| |  |  | Disposition-and-liquidation phase
| | - |  | ---------------------------------

The period during which the Partnership sells its real estate investments, distributes net sale proceeds to the partners, liquidates, and terminates the Partnership.

The Partnership is in the holding phase of its life cycle, and accordingly will focus resources on managing the Partnerships existing portfolio, including
identifying strategic sales of certain properties, and locating suitable replacement tenants for vacant space as necessary.

Employees

The Partnership has no direct employees. The employees of Wells Capital and Wells Management Company, Inc. (Wells Management), an affiliate of the General
Partners, perform a full range of real estate services for the Partnership including leasing and property management, accounting, asset management, and investor relations. See Item 13, Certain Relationships and Related Transactions,
for a summary of the fees paid to the General Partners and their affiliates during the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004.

Insurance

Wells Management carries comprehensive liability and extended coverage with respect to the properties we own through our interest in the joint venture.
In the opinion of management, our properties are adequately insured.

Competition

We will experience competition for tenants from owners and managers of competing projects which may include the General Partners and their affiliates. As a result, in connection with negotiating leases, we may offer
rental concessions, reduced charges for tenant improvements, and other inducements, all of which may have an adverse impact on results of operations. We are also in competition with sellers of similar properties to locate suitable purchasers for its
properties.

Economic Dependency

We have engaged Wells
Capital and Wells Management to provide certain essential services, including supervision of the management and leasing of our properties, asset acquisition and disposition services, as well as other administrative responsibilities for us including
accounting services, investor communications and relations. These agreements are terminable by either party upon 60 days written notice. As a result of these relationships, we are dependent upon Wells Capital and Wells Management.

Wells Capital and Wells Management are all owned and controlled by WREF. The operations of Wells Capital and Wells Management represent substantially all of the
business of WREF. Accordingly, we focus on the financial condition of WREF when assessing the financial condition of Wells Capital and Wells Management. In the event that WREF was to become unable to meet its obligations as they become due, we might
be required to find alternative service providers.

Future net income generated by WREF will be largely dependent upon the amount of fees earned by Wells
Capital and Wells Management based on, among other things, the level of investor proceeds raised from the sale of common stock for certain WREF-sponsored programs and the volume of future acquisitions and dispositions of real estate assets by
WREF-sponsored programs. As of December 31, 2006, we believe that WREF generates adequate cash flow from operations and has adequate liquidity available in the form of cash on hand and current receivables necessary to meet its current and
future obligations as they become due.

Additionally, we are dependent upon the ability of our current tenants to pay their contractual rent amounts as the
rents become due. The inability of a tenant to pay future rental amounts would have a negative impact on our results of operations. If certain situations prevent our tenants from paying contractual rents, this could result in a material adverse
impact on our results of operations.



Page 3



---

Assertion of Legal Action Against Related-Parties

On March 12, 2007, a stockholder of Wells Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (Wells REIT), a Wells-sponsored program, filed a purported class action and derivative complaint against, among others,
Wells REIT, the officers and directors of Wells REIT, Leo. F. Wells, III and Wells Capital, our General Partners, and certain affiliates of WREF.

The
complaint attempts to assert class action claims on behalf of those persons who receive and are entitled to vote on a proxy statement for Wells REIT that was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on February 26,
2007, as amended (the proxy statement). The complaint alleges, among other things, that (i) the consideration to be paid as part of a proposed merger agreement to acquire certain affiliates of WREF is excessive; and (ii) the
proxy statement contains false and misleading statements or omits to state material facts. Additionally, the complaint seeks to, among other things, obtain (i) certification of the class action; (ii) a judgment declaring the proxy
statement false and misleading; (iii) unspecified monetary damages; (iv) nullification of any stockholder approvals obtained during the proxy process; (v) nullification of the merger proposal and the merger agreement;
(vi) restitution for disgorgement of profits, benefits, and other compensation for wrongful conduct and fiduciary breaches; (vii) the nomination and election of new independent directors, and the retention of a new financial advisor to
assess the advisability of Wells REITs strategic alternatives; and (viii) the payment of reasonable attorneys fees and experts fees.

Wells REIT, our General Partners, and certain affiliates of WREF believe that the allegations contained in the complaint are without merit and intends to vigorously defend this action. Due to the uncertainties inherent in the litigation
process, it is not possible to predict the ultimate outcome of this matter at this time; however, as with any litigation, the risk of financial loss does exist. Any financial loss incurred by WREF, which adversely affects the financial health of
Wells Capital or its affiliates, could hinder their ability to successfully manage our operations and our portfolio of investments.

Web Site Address

Access to copies of each of our filings with the SEC is available, free of charge, at the http://www.wellsref.com Web site, through a link to the
http://www.sec.gov Web site.



|ITEM 1A. | RISK FACTORS.
|-------- | -------------

Real Estate Risks

Economic and regulatory changes that impact the real estate market generally may cause our operating results to suffer and decrease the value of our real estate
properties.

Our operating results will be subject to risks generally incident to the ownership of real estate, including:



| |  |  | changes in general or local economic conditions;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | changes in supply of or demand for similar or competing properties in an area;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | changes in interest rates and availability of permanent mortgage funds, which may render the sale of a property difficult or unattractive;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | changes in tax, real estate, environmental and zoning laws; and
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | periods of high interest rates and tight money supply.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------

These and other reasons may prevent us from being profitable or from realizing growth or maintaining the value of our real estate properties.

General economic conditions may affect the timing of sale of our properties and the sale price we receive.

We may be unable to sell a
property if or when we decide to do so. The real estate market is affected by many factors, such as general economic conditions, the availability of financing, interest rates, and other factors, including



Page 4



---

supply and demand for real estate investments, all of which are beyond our control. We cannot predict whether we will be able to sell any property for the
price or on terms which are acceptable to us. Further, we cannot predict the length of time which will be needed to find a willing purchaser and to close the sale of a property.

Adverse economic conditions in the geographic regions in which we own properties may negatively impact your overall returns.

Adverse economic conditions in the geographic regions in which we own our properties could affect the real estate values in this area or the business of our tenants if any of our tenants rely upon the local economy for their revenues.
Therefore, changes in local economic conditions could reduce our income and distributions to limited partners or the amounts we could otherwise receive upon the sale of a property in a negatively affected region.

Adverse economic conditions affecting the particular industries of the tenants of our properties may negatively impact your overall returns.

Adverse economic conditions affecting a particular industry of one or more of our tenants, such as the technology industry, could affect the financial ability of one or
more of our tenants to make payments under their leases, which could cause delays in our receipt of rental revenues or a vacancy in one or more of our properties for a period of time. Therefore, changes in economic conditions of the particular
industry of one or more of our tenants could reduce our income and distributions to limited partners and the value of one or more of our properties at the time of sale of such properties.

We are dependent on our tenants for substantially all of our revenue, so our success is materially dependent on the financial stability of our tenants.

Most of our properties are occupied by a single tenant or only a few tenants and, therefore, the success of our investments are materially dependent on
the financial stability of our tenants. Lease payment defaults by tenants could cause us to reduce the amount of distributions to holders of Cash Preferred Units. A default of a tenant on its lease payments to us would cause us to lose the revenue
from the property. In the event of a default, we may experience delays in enforcing our rights as landlord and may incur substantial costs in protecting our investment and re-letting our property. If a lease is terminated, we cannot assure you that
we will be able to lease the property for the rent previously received or sell the property without incurring a loss.

Your investment in units are
subject to greater risk because we lack a diversified property portfolio.

Because we own interests in only a limited number of properties, your
investment in units are subject to a greater risk of loss. There is a greater risk that you will lose money in your investment because our portfolio of properties is not diverse by geographic location, property type, or industry group of tenants.

Our future financial success depends on only a few tenants.

The revenues generated by these tenants are substantially reliant upon the financial condition of these tenants and, accordingly, any event of bankruptcy, insolvency, or a general downturn in the business of any of these tenants may result
in the failure or delay of such tenants rental payments, which may have a substantial adverse effect on our financial performance.

We depend on
tenants for our revenue. Accordingly, lease terminations and/or tenant default could reduce our net income and limit our ability to make distributions to our stockholders.

The success of our investments materially depends on the financial stability of our tenants. A default or termination by a significant tenant on its lease payments to us would cause us to lose the revenue associated
with such lease and require us to find an alternative source of revenue to meet mortgage payments and prevent a foreclosure if the property is subject to a mortgage. In the event of a tenant default or bankruptcy, we may



Page 5



---

experience delays in enforcing our rights as landlord and may incur substantial costs in protecting our investment and re-letting our property. If
significant leases are terminated or defaulted upon, we may be unable to lease the property for the rent previously received or sell the property without incurring a loss. These events could cause us to reduce the amount of distributions to limited
partners.

If one or more of our tenants file bankruptcy, we may be precluded from collecting all sums due.

If one or more of our tenants, or the guarantor of a tenants lease, commences, or has commenced against it, any proceeding under any provision of the federal
Bankruptcy Code, as amended, or any other legal or equitable proceeding under any bankruptcy, insolvency, rehabilitation, receivership, or debtors relief statute or law (bankruptcy proceeding), we may be unable to collect sums due under
relevant leases. Any or all of the tenants, or a guarantor of a tenants lease obligations, could be subject to a bankruptcy proceeding. Such a bankruptcy proceeding may bar our efforts to collect pre-bankruptcy debts from these entities or
their properties, unless we are able to obtain an enabling order from the bankruptcy court. If a lease is rejected by a tenant in bankruptcy, we would only have a general unsecured claim against the tenant, and may not be entitled to any further
payments under the lease. A tenants or lease guarantors bankruptcy proceeding could hinder or delay efforts to collect past due balances under relevant leases, and could ultimately preclude collection of these sums. Such an event could
cause a decrease or cessation of rental payments which would mean a reduction in our cash flow and the amount available for distribution to limited partners holding Cash Preferred Units. In the event of a bankruptcy proceeding, we cannot assure you
that the tenant or its trustee will assume our lease. If a given lease, or guaranty of a lease, is not assumed, our cash flow and the amounts available for distribution to limited partners holding Cash Preferred Units may be adversely affected.

We may not have funding for future tenant improvements which may reduce your returns and make it difficult to attract one or more new tenants.

When a tenant at one of our properties does not renew its lease or otherwise vacates its space in one of our buildings, it is likely that in order to
attract one or more new tenants, we will be required to expend substantial funds for tenant improvements and tenant refurbishments to the vacated space and other lease-up costs. Substantially all of our net offering proceeds available for investment
have been used for investment in Partnership properties, and we do not anticipate that we will maintain permanent working capital reserves. We also have not identified a funding source to provide funds which may be required in the future for tenant
improvements, tenant refurbishments, and other lease-up costs in order to attract new tenants. We cannot assure you that any such source of funding will be available to us for such purposes in the future. In the event that we are required to use net
cash from operations to fund such tenant improvements, tenant refurbishments, and other lease-up costs, cash distributions to limited partners holding Cash Preferred Units will be reduced or eliminated for potentially extended periods of time.

A property that incurs a vacancy could be difficult to sell or lease.

A property may incur a vacancy either by the continued default of a tenant under its lease or the expiration of one of our leases. Our properties may be leased to a single tenant and/or may be specifically suited to
the particular needs of certain tenants based on the type of business the tenant operates. If a vacancy on any of our properties continues for a long period of time, we may suffer reduced revenues resulting in less cash to be distributed to
investors holding Cash Preferred Units. In addition, the resale value of the property could be diminished because the market value of a particular property will depend principally upon the value of the leases of such property.

Uninsured losses relating to real property or excessively expensive premiums for insurance coverage could reduce our net income.

Our General Partners will attempt to obtain adequate insurance on all of our properties to cover casualty losses. However, there are types of losses, generally
catastrophic in nature, such as losses due to wars, acts of terrorism, earthquakes, floods, hurricanes, pollution, or environmental matters that are uninsurable or not economically



Page 6



---

insurable, or may be insured subject to limitations, such as large deductibles or co-payments. Insurance risks associated with potential terrorism acts could
sharply increase the premiums we pay for coverage against property and casualty claims. We may not have adequate coverage for such losses. If any of our properties incur a casualty loss that is not fully insured, the value of our assets will be
reduced by such uninsured loss. In addition, other than reserves of net cash from operations we may establish, we have no source of funding to repair or reconstruct any uninsured damaged property. Also, to the extent we must pay unexpectedly large
amounts for insurance, we could suffer reduced earnings that would result in lower distributions to limited partners.

Uncertain market conditions and
the broad discretion of our General Partners relating to the future disposition of properties could adversely affect the return on your investment.

We
generally will hold the various real properties in which we invest until such time as the General Partners determine that the sale or other disposition thereof appears to be advantageous to achieve our investment objectives or until it appears that
such objectives will not be met. Our General Partners intend to sell properties acquired for development after holding such properties for a minimum period of 10 years from the date the development is completed, and intend to sell existing
income-producing properties within 10 to 12 years after their acquisition, or as soon thereafter as market conditions permit. This is the period of time it typically takes to realize significant appreciation of the type of property in which we
traditionally invest. However, our General Partners may exercise their discretion as to whether and when to sell a property, and we will have no obligation to sell properties at any particular time, except upon the termination of the Partnership as
specified in the partnership agreement, or earlier if a majority of you vote to liquidate the Partnership pursuant to a formal proxy to liquidate. We cannot predict with any certainty the various market conditions affecting real estate investments
which will exist at any particular time in the future. Due to the uncertainty of market conditions which may affect the future disposition of our properties, we cannot assure you that we will be able to sell our properties at a profit in the future.
Accordingly, the timing of liquidation of the Partnership and the extent to which you will receive cash distributions and realize potential appreciation on our real estate investments will be dependent upon fluctuating market conditions.

If any environmentally hazardous material is determined to exist on a property owned by the Partnership, our operating results could be adversely affected.

Under various federal, state, and local environmental laws, ordinances, and regulations, a current or previous owner or operator of real property may
be liable for the cost of removal or remediation of hazardous or toxic substances on, under or in such property. Such laws often impose liability whether or not the owner or operator knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of such hazardous or
toxic substances. Environmental laws also may impose restrictions on the manner in which property may be used or businesses may be operated, and these restrictions may require expenditures. Environmental laws provide for sanctions in the event of
noncompliance and may be enforced by governmental agencies or, in certain circumstances, by private parties. In connection with the acquisition and ownership of our properties, we may be potentially liable for such costs. The cost of defending
against claims of liability, complying with environmental regulatory requirements, or remediating any contaminated property could materially adversely affect the business, assets, or results of operations of the Partnership and, consequently,
amounts available for distribution to limited partners holding Cash Preferred Units.

The Partnership and/or other prior Wells public limited
partnerships sponsored by our General Partners have sold real estate properties for a sale price less than the original purchase price.

Certain of the
real estate properties previously purchased by the Partnership and other Wells public limited partnerships sponsored by the General Partners have not appreciated to the levels anticipated at the time of purchase. Recently some of these properties
have been sold by such programs at purchase prices below the prices paid for such properties. We cannot guarantee that any of our properties will appreciate in value.



Page 7



---

General Investment Risks

The Georgia Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act (GRULPA) does not grant you any specific voting rights and your rights are limited under our partnership agreement.

A vote of a majority in interest of the limited partners is sufficient to take the following significant Partnership actions:



| |  |  | to amend our partnership agreement;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------



| |  |  | to change our business purpose or our investment objectives;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | to remove our General Partners; or
| | - |  | ----------------------------------



| |  |  | to authorize a merger or a consolidation of the Partnership.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------

These are your only significant voting rights granted under our partnership agreement. In addition, GRULPA does not grant you any specific voting rights. Therefore, your voting rights are severely limited.

You are bound by the majority vote on matters on which you are entitled to vote.

You may approve any of the above actions by majority vote of the limited partners. Therefore, you are bound by such majority vote even if you do not vote with the majority on any of these actions.

Under our partnership agreement, we are required to indemnify our General Partners under certain circumstances which may reduce returns to our limited partners.

Under our partnership agreement and subject to certain limitations, the Partnership is required to indemnify our General Partners from and against
losses, liabilities, and damages relating to or arising out of any action or inaction on behalf of the Partnership done in good faith and in the best interest of the Partnership. If substantial and expensive litigation should ensue and the
Partnership is obligated to indemnify one or both General Partners, we may be forced to use substantial funds to do so, which may reduce the return on your investment.

Payment of fees to our General Partners and their affiliates will reduce cash available for distributions to our limited partners.

Our General Partners and their affiliates perform services for us in connection with the management and leasing of our properties in which we own interests. Our affiliates may receive property management and leasing
fees of 4.5% of gross revenues in connection with the commercial properties we own. In addition, we will reimburse our General Partners and their affiliates for the administrative services necessary to our prudent operation, which includes actual
costs of goods, services, and materials used for or by the Partnership. These fees and reimbursements will reduce the amount of cash available for capital expenditures to our properties or distributions to our limited partners.

The availability and the timing of cash distributions are uncertain.

We cannot assure you that sufficient cash will be available to make distributions to you from either net cash from operations or proceeds from the sale of properties. We bear all expenses incurred in connection with our operations, which
are deducted from cash funds generated by operations prior to computing the amount of net cash from operations to be distributed to our general and limited partners. In addition, our General Partners, in their discretion, may retain all or any
portion of net cash generated from our operations and/or proceeds from the sale of our properties for tenant improvements, tenant refurbishments, and other lease-up costs or for working capital reserves.

Gains and distributions upon sale of our properties are uncertain.

Although gains from the sale of properties typically represent a substantial portion of any profits attributable to real estate investments, we cannot assure you that we will realize any gains on the sale of our properties. In any



Page 8



---

event, you should not expect distribution of such proceeds to occur during the early years of our operations. We generally will not sell properties until at
least 10 to 12 years after the acquisition of the properties and our General Partners may exercise their discretion as to whether and when to sell a property, therefore, we have no obligation to sell properties at any particular time. Further,
receipt of the full proceeds of such sales may be extended over a substantial period of time following the sales. In addition, the amount of taxable gain allocated to you with respect to the sale of a Partnership property could exceed the cash
proceeds received from such sale. While proceeds from the sale of a property will generally be distributed to investors, the General Partners, in their sole discretion, may not make such distribution if such proceeds are used to:



| |  |  | purchase land underlying any of our properties;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------



| |  |  | buy out the interest of any co-venturer or joint venture partner in a property which is jointly owned;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | establish working capital reserves; or
| | - |  | --------------------------------------



| |  |  | make repairs, maintenance, tenant improvements, capital improvements, or other expenditures to any of our existing properties.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We are uncertain of our sources for funding of future capital needs.

Substantially all of the gross proceeds of the offering were used to invest in properties and to pay various fees and expenses. In addition, we do not anticipate that we will maintain any permanent working capital reserves. Accordingly, in
the event that we develop a need for additional capital in the future, such as the funding of tenant improvements, tenant refurbishments or other lease-up costs, we have not identified any sources for such funding, and we cannot assure you that any
sources of funding will be available to us for potential capital needs in the future.

We may need to reserve net cash from operations for future tenant
improvements which may reduce your returns.

We may be required to expend substantial funds for tenant improvements and tenant refurbishments to vacated
space and other lease-up costs. Substantially all of our net offering proceeds available for investment will be used for investment in Partnership properties, and we do not anticipate that we will maintain permanent working capital reserves. We also
have no identified funding source to provide funds which may be required in the future for tenant improvements, tenant refurbishments, and other lease-up costs in order to attract new tenants. We cannot assure you that any such source of funding
will be available to us for such purposes in the future. In the event that we are required to use net cash from operations to fund such tenant improvements, tenant refurbishments, and other lease-up costs, cash distributions to limited partners
holding Cash Preferred Units will be reduced or eliminated for potentially extended periods of time.

Marketability and Transferability Risks

There is no public trading market for your units.

There is no public market for your units, and we do not anticipate that any public trading market for your units will ever develop. If you attempt to sell your units, you would likely do so at substantially discounted prices on the
secondary market. Further, our partnership agreement restricts our ability to participate in a public trading market or anything substantially equivalent to one by providing that any transfer which may cause us to be classified as a publicly
traded partnership as defined in Section 7704 of the Internal Revenue Code shall be deemed void and shall not be recognized. Because classification of the Partnership as a publicly traded partnership may significantly decrease
the value of your units, our General Partners intend to use their authority to the maximum extent possible to prohibit transfers of units which could cause us to be classified as a publicly traded partnership.



Page 9



---

Your units have limited transferability and lack liquidity due to restrictions under state regulatory laws and our
partnership agreement.

You are limited in your ability to transfer your units. Our partnership agreement and certain state regulatory agencies have
imposed restrictions relating to the number of units you may transfer. In addition, the suitability standards applied to you upon the purchase of your units may also be applied to persons to whom you wish to transfer your units. Accordingly, you may
find it difficult to sell your units for cash or if you are able to sell your units, you may have to sell your units at a substantial discount. You may not be able to sell your units in the event of an emergency, and your units are not likely to be
accepted as collateral for a loan.

Our estimated unit valuations should not be viewed as an accurate reflection of the value of the limited
partners units.

The estimated unit valuations contained in this annual report on Form 10-K should not be viewed as an accurate reflection of the
value of the limited partners units, what limited partners might be able to sell their units for, or the fair market value of the Partnerships properties, nor do they necessarily represent the amount of net proceeds limited partners
would receive if the Partnerships properties were sold and the proceeds distributed in a liquidation of the Partnership. There is no established public trading market for the Partnerships limited partnership units, and it is not
anticipated that a public trading market for the units will ever develop. We did not obtain any third-party appraisals of our properties in connection with these estimated unit valuations. In addition, property values are subject to change and could
decline in the future. The valuations performed by the General Partners are estimates only, and are based on a number of assumptions which may not be accurate or complete and may or may not be applicable to any specific limited partnership units.
Further, these estimated valuations assume, and are applicable only to, limited partners who have made no conversion elections under the partnership agreement and who purchased their units directly from the Partnership in the Partnerships
original public offering of units. It should also be noted that, as properties are sold and the net proceeds from property sales are distributed to limited partners, the remaining value of the Partnerships portfolio of properties, and
resulting value of Partnerships limited partnership units, will naturally decline.

Special Risks Regarding Status of Units

If you hold Cash Preferred Units, we expect that you will be allocated more income than cash flow.

Since limited partners holding Cash Preferred Units are allocated substantially all of the Partnerships net income, while substantially all deductions for depreciation and other tax losses are allocated to
limited partners holding Tax Preferred Units, we expect that those of you who hold Cash Preferred Units will be allocated taxable income in excess of your cash distributions. We cannot assure you that cash flow will be available for distribution in
any year.

If you hold Tax Preferred Units, you may not be able to use your passive losses.

Those of you holding Tax Preferred Units will be allocated a disproportionately larger share of our deductions for depreciation and other tax losses. Such losses will be
treated as passive losses, which may only be used to offset passive income and may not be used to offset active or portfolio income. Accordingly, you may receive no current benefit from your share of tax losses unless you are
currently being allocated passive income from other sources.

In addition, the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 (the Act) added
Section 470 to the Internal Revenue Code, which provides for certain limitations on the utilization of losses allocable to leased property owned by a partnership having both taxable and tax-exempt partners, such as the Partnership. In March
2005, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued IRS Notice 2005-29 announcing that the IRS would not be applying Section 470 to disallow losses for tax year 2004 based solely on the fact that a partnership had both taxable and
tax-exempt partners. In December 2005, the IRS issued IRS Notice 2006-2 extending the period for transitional relief



Page 10



---

through the 2005 tax year and in December 2006, the IRS again extended the period for transitional relief through all tax years beginning prior to
January 1, 2007. The IRS has indicated that it is continuing to study the application of Section 470 to partnerships, such as the Partnership, but unless further legislation is enacted which addresses this issue or some other form of
relief from the provisions of Section 470 of the Act is granted, beginning in tax year 2007 and thereafter, passive losses allocable to limited partners holding Tax Preferred Units may be used only to offset passive income generated from the
same property or within the same fund.

The desired effect of holding Cash Preferred Units or Tax Preferred Units may be reduced depending on how many
investors hold each type of unit.

You will be entitled to different rights and priorities as to distributions of cash flow from operations and net sale
proceeds and as to the allocation of depreciation and other tax losses depending upon whether you are holding Cash Preferred Units or Tax Preferred Units. However, the effect of any advantage associated with holding Cash Preferred Units or Tax
Preferred Units may be significantly reduced or eliminated, depending upon the ratio of Cash Preferred Units to Tax Preferred Units during any given period. We will not attempt to restrict the ratio of Cash Preferred Units to Tax Preferred Units,
and we will not attempt to establish or maintain any particular ratio.

Management Risks

You must rely on our General Partners for management of our business.

Our General Partners make all decisions with respect to the management of the Partnership. Limited partners have no right or power to take part in the management of the Partnership, except through the exercise of limited voting rights.
Therefore, you must rely almost entirely on our General Partners for management of the Partnership and the operation of its business. Our General Partners may be removed only under certain conditions set forth in our partnership agreement. If our
General Partners are removed, they will receive payment equal to the fair market value of their interests in the Partnership as agreed upon by our General Partners and the Partnership or by arbitration if they are unable to agree.

Leo F. Wells, III has a primary role in determining what is in the best interests of the Partnership and its limited partners.

Leo F. Wells, III is one of our General Partners and is the president, treasurer, and sole director of Wells Capital, our other general partner. Therefore, one person has
a primary role in determining what is in the best interests of the Partnership and its limited partners. Although Mr. Wells relies on the input of the officers and other employees of Wells Capital, he ultimately has the authority to make
decisions affecting our Partnership operations. Therefore, Mr. Wells alone will determine the propriety of his own actions, which could result in a conflict of interest when he is faced with any significant decision relating to our Partnership
affairs.

Our loss of or inability to obtain key personnel could delay or hinder implementation of our investment strategies, which could limit our
ability to make distributions.

Our success depends to a significant degree upon the contributions of Leo F. Wells, III, Douglas P. Williams, and
Randall D. Fretz, each of whom would be difficult to replace. We do not have employment agreements with Messrs. Wells, Williams, or Fretz, and we cannot guarantee that such persons will remain affiliated with us. If any of Wells Capitals key
personnel were to cease their affiliation with the Partnership, we may be unable to find suitable replacement personnel, and our operating results could suffer. We do not maintain key person life insurance on any person. We believe that our future
success depends, in large part, upon the ability of our General Partners to hire and retain highly skilled managerial and operational personnel. If we lose or are unable to obtain the services of highly skilled personnel or do not establish or
maintain appropriate strategic relationships, our ability to implement our investment strategies could be delayed or hindered, and the value of your investment may decline.



Page 11



---

Our operating performance could suffer if Wells Capital incurs significant losses, including those losses that may
result from being the general partner of other entities.

We are dependent on Wells Capital to conduct our operations; thus, adverse changes in the
financial condition of Wells Capital or our relationship with Wells Capital could hinder its ability to successfully manage our operations and our portfolio of investments. As a general partner in many Wells-sponsored programs, Wells Capital may
have contingent liabilities for the obligations of such programs. Enforcement of such obligations against Wells Capital could result in a substantial reduction of its net worth. If such liabilities affected the level of services that Wells Capital
could provide, our operations and financial performance could suffer.

Our General Partners have a limited net worth consisting of illiquid assets which
may affect their ability to fulfill their financial obligations to the Partnership.

The net worth of our General Partners consists primarily of
interests in real estate, retirement plans, partnerships, and closely-held businesses and, in the case of Wells Capital, receivables from affiliated corporations and partnerships. Accordingly, the net worth of our General Partners is illiquid and
not readily marketable. This illiquidity may be relevant to you in evaluating the ability of our General Partners to fulfill their financial obligations to the Partnership. In addition, our General Partners have significant commitments to the other
Wells-sponsored programs.

Our operating performance could suffer if Wells Capital incurs significant losses, including those losses that may result
from being the general partner of other entities.

We are dependent on Wells Capital and its affiliates to select investments and conduct our
operations. Thus, adverse changes to our relationship with or the financial health of Wells Capital and its affiliates, including changes arising from litigation, could hinder their ability to successfully manage our operations and our portfolio of
investments. As a general partner to many WREF-sponsored programs, Wells Capital may have contingent liability for the obligations of such partnerships. Enforcement of such obligations against Wells Capital could result in a substantial reduction of
its net worth. If such liabilities affected the level of services that Wells Capital could provide, our operations and financial performance could suffer.

Conflicts of Interest Risks

Our General Partners will face conflicts of interest relating to time management which could result in lower
returns on our investments.

Because our General Partners and their affiliates have interests in other real estate programs and also engage in other
business activities, they could have conflicts of interest in allocating their time between our business and these other activities, which could affect operations of the Partnership. You should note that our partnership agreement does not specify
any minimum amount of time or level of attention that our General Partners are required to devote to the Partnership.

Our General Partners will face
conflicts of interest relating to the sale and leasing of properties.

We may be selling properties at the same time as other Wells programs are buying
and selling properties. We may have acquired or be selling properties in geographic areas where other Wells programs own properties or are trying to sell properties, which could lower your return on your investment.

Investments in joint ventures with affiliates will result in additional risks involving our relationship with the co-venturer.

We have entered into joint ventures with affiliates. Such investments may involve risks not otherwise present with an investment in real estate, including, for example:



| |  |  | the possibility that our co-venturer, co-tenant, or partner in an investment might become bankrupt;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Page 12



---

| |  |  | that such co-venturer, co-tenant, or partner may at any time have economic or business interests or goals which are or which become inconsistent with our business
interests or goals; or
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | that such co-venturer, co-tenant, or partner may be in a position to take action contrary to our instructions or requests or contrary to our policies or objectives.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Actions by such a co-venturer, co-tenant, or partner might result in subjecting the property to liabilities in excess of those
contemplated and may have the effect of reducing your returns.

Our General Partners will face various conflicts of interest relating to joint ventures
with affiliates.

Since our General Partners and their affiliates control both the Partnership and other affiliates, transactions between the parties
with respect to joint ventures between such parties do not have the benefit of arms length negotiation of the type normally conducted between unrelated co-venturers. Under these joint venture arrangements, neither co-venturer has the power to
control the venture, and an impasse could be reached regarding matters pertaining to the joint venture, which might have a negative influence on the joint venture and decrease potential returns to you. In the event that a co-venturer has a right of
first refusal to buy out the other co-venturer, it may be unable to finance such buy-out at that time. It may also be difficult for us to sell our interest in any such joint venture or partnership or as a co-tenant in property. In addition, to the
extent that our co-venturer, partner, or co-tenant is an affiliate of our General Partners, certain conflicts of interest will exist.

Federal Income
Tax Risks

The IRS may challenge our characterization of material tax aspects of your investment in the Partnership.

An investment in units involves certain material income tax risks, the character and extent of which are, to some extent, a function of whether you hold Cash Preferred
Units or Tax Preferred Units. We will not seek any rulings from the IRS regarding any of the tax issues related to your units.

Investors may realize
taxable income without cash distributions.

As a limited partner in the Partnership, you are required to report your allocable share of the
Partnerships taxable income on your personal income tax return regardless of whether or not you have received any cash distributions from the Partnership. For example, if you hold Cash Preferred Units, you will be allocated substantially all
of our net income, defined in the partnership agreement to mean generally net income for federal income tax purposes, including any income exempt from tax, but excluding all deductions for depreciation and amortization and gain or loss from the sale
of Partnership properties, even if such income is in excess of any distributions of cash from our operations. In addition, if you hold Cash Preferred Units, you will be allocated your share of our net income with respect to such units even though
net cash from our operations otherwise distributable to you will instead be paid to third parties to satisfy the deferred commission obligations with respect to such units for a period of six years following the year of purchase, or longer if
required to satisfy the outstanding commission obligation. If you hold Cash Preferred Units, you will likely be allocated taxable income in excess of any distributions to you, and the amount of cash received by you could be less than the income tax
attributable to the net income allocated to you.

We could potentially be characterized as a publicly traded partnership resulting in unfavorable tax
results.

If the IRS were to classify the Partnership as a publicly traded partnership, we could be taxable as a corporation, and
distributions made to you could be treated as portfolio income to you rather than passive income. We cannot assure you that we will not, at some time in the future, be treated as a publicly traded partnership due to the following factors:



| |  |  | the complex nature of the IRS rules governing our potential exemption from classification as a publicly traded partnership;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the lack of interpretive guidance with respect to such rules; and
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | the fact that any determination in this regard will necessarily be based upon events which have not yet occurred.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Page 13



---

The IRS may challenge our allocations of profit and loss.

While it is more likely than not Partnership items of income, gain, loss, deduction, and credit will be allocated among our General Partners and our limited partners
substantially in accordance with the allocation provisions of the partnership agreement, we cannot assure you that the IRS will not successfully challenge the allocations in the partnership agreement and reallocate items of income, gain, loss,
deduction, and credit in a manner which reduces the anticipated tax benefits to investors holding Tax Preferred Units or increases the income allocated to investors holding Cash Preferred Units.

We may be audited and additional tax, interest, and penalties may be imposed upon you.

Our federal income tax returns may be audited by the IRS. Any audit of the Partnership could result in an audit of your tax return causing adjustments of items unrelated to your investment in the Partnership, in
addition to adjustments to various Partnership items. In the event of any such adjustments, you might incur accountants or attorneys fees, court costs, and other expenses contesting deficiencies asserted by the IRS. You may also be
liable for interest on any underpayment and certain penalties from the date your tax was originally due. The tax treatment of all Partnership items will generally be determined at the partnership level in a single proceeding rather than in separate
proceedings with each partner, and our General Partners are primarily responsible for contesting federal income tax adjustments proposed by the IRS. In this connection, our General Partners may extend the statute of limitations as to all partners
and, in certain circumstances, may bind the partners to a settlement with the IRS. Further, our General Partners may cause us to elect to be treated as an electing large partnership. If they do, we could take advantage of simplified
flow-through reporting of Partnership items. Adjustments to Partnership items would continue to be determined at the partnership level, however, and any such adjustments would be accounted for in the year they take effect, rather than in the year to
which such adjustments relate. Accordingly, if you make an election to change the status of your units between the years in which a tax benefit is claimed and an adjustment is made, you may suffer a disproportionate adverse impact with respect to
any such adjustment. Further, our General Partners will have the discretion in such circumstances either to pass along any such adjustments to the partners or to bear such adjustments at the partnership level, thereby potentially adversely impacting
the holders of a particular class of units disproportionately to holders of the other class of units.

State and local taxes and a requirement to
withhold state taxes may apply.

The state in which you reside may impose an income tax upon your share of our taxable income. Further, states in which
we own properties may impose income taxes upon your share of our taxable income allocable to any Partnership property located in that state or other taxes on limited partnerships owning properties in their states. Many states have implemented or are
implementing programs to require partnerships to withhold and pay state income taxes owed by nonresident partners relating to income-producing properties located in their states, and we may be required to withhold state taxes from cash distributions
otherwise payable to you. In the event we are required to withhold state taxes from your cash distributions, or pay other state taxes, the amount of the net cash from operations otherwise payable to you would be reduced. In addition, such collection
and filing requirements at the state level may result in increases in our administrative expenses which would have the effect of reducing cash available for distribution to you. You are urged to consult with your own tax advisors with respect to the
impact of applicable state and local taxes and state tax withholding requirements or other potential state taxes relating to an investment in our units.

Legislative or regulatory action could adversely affect investors.

In recent years, numerous legislative, judicial, and administrative
changes have been made in the provisions of the federal income tax laws applicable to investments similar to an investment in our units. Additional changes to the tax laws are likely to continue to occur in the future, and we cannot assure you that
any such changes will not adversely affect the taxation of a limited partner. Any such changes could have an adverse effect on an investment in our units or on the market value or the resale potential of our properties. You are urged to consult



Page 14



---

with your own tax advisor with respect to the impact of recent legislation on your investment in units and the status of legislative, regulatory, or
administrative developments and proposals and their potential effect on an investment in our units.

Retirement Plan and Qualified Plan Risks

There are special considerations that apply to a pension or profit-sharing trust or an Individual Retirement Account (IRA) investing in
units.

If you are investing the assets of a pension, profit-sharing, Section 401(k), Keogh, or other qualified retirement plan or the assets of an
IRA in units, you should satisfy yourself that:



| |  |  | your investment is consistent with your fiduciary obligations under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) and the Internal Revenue Code;
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | your investment is made in accordance with the documents and instruments governing your plan or IRA, including your plans investment policy;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | your investment satisfies the prudence and diversification requirements of Sections 404(a)(1)(B) and 404(a)(1)(C) of ERISA;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | your investment will not impair the liquidity of the plan or IRA;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | your investment will not produce unrelated business taxable income for the plan or IRA;
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | you will be able to value the assets of the plan annually in accordance with ERISA requirements; and
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | your investment will not constitute a prohibited transaction under Section 406 of ERISA or Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

We may dissolve the Partnership if our assets are deemed to be plan assets or if we engage in prohibited transactions.

If our assets were deemed to be assets of qualified plans investing as limited partners, i.e., plan assets, our General Partners would be considered to
be fiduciaries of such plans and certain contemplated transactions between our General Partners or their affiliates, and the Partnership may then be deemed to be prohibited transactions subject to excise taxation under Section 4975
of the Internal Revenue Code. Additionally, if our assets were deemed to be plan assets, the standards of prudence and other provisions of ERISA applicable to plan fiduciaries would apply to the General Partners with respect to our investments. We
have not sought a ruling from the U.S. Department of Labor regarding the potential classification of our assets as plan assets.

In this regard, U.S.
Department of Labor Regulations defining plan assets for purposes of ERISA contain exemptions which, if satisfied, would preclude assets of a limited partnership such as ours from being treated as plan assets. We cannot assure you that our
partnership agreement has been structured so that the exemptions in such Regulations would apply to us, although our General Partners intend that an investment by a qualified plan in units will not be deemed an investment in the assets of the
Partnership. We can make no representations or warranties of any kind regarding the consequences of an investment in our units by qualified plans in this regard. Plan fiduciaries are urged to consult with and rely upon their own advisors with
respect to this and other ERISA issues which, if decided adversely to the Partnership, could result in qualified plan investors being deemed to have engaged in prohibited transactions, which would cause the imposition of excise taxes and
co-fiduciary liability under Section 405 of ERISA in the event actions taken by us are deemed to be nonprudent investments or prohibited transactions.

In the event our assets are deemed to constitute plan assets or certain transactions undertaken by us are deemed to constitute prohibited transactions under ERISA or the Internal Revenue Code, and no
exemption for such transactions is obtainable by us, the General Partners have the right, but not the obligation, upon notice to all limited partners, but without the consent of any limited partner, to:



| |  |  | compel a termination and dissolution of the Partnership; or
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------



Page 15



---

| |  |  | restructure our activities to the extent necessary to comply with any exemption in the U.S. Department of Labor Regulations or any prohibited transaction exemption
granted by the Department of Labor or any condition which the Department of Labor might impose as a condition to granting a prohibited transaction exemption.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Adverse tax consequences may result because of minimum distribution requirements.

If you intend to purchase units
through your IRA, or if you are a custodian of an IRA or a trustee or other fiduciary of a retirement plan considering an investment in units, you must consider the limited liquidity of an investment in our units as it relates to applicable minimum
distribution requirements under the Internal Revenue Code. If units are held and our properties have not yet been sold at such time as mandatory distributions are required to begin to an IRA beneficiary or qualified plan participant, Sections
408(a)(6) and 401(a)(9) of the Internal Revenue Code will likely require that a distribution-in-kind of the units be made to the IRA beneficiary or qualified plan participant. Any such distribution-in-kind of units must be included in the taxable
income of the IRA beneficiary or qualified plan participant for the year in which the units are received at the fair market value of the units and taxes attributable thereto must be paid without any corresponding cash distributions from us with
which to pay such income tax liability.

Unrelated business taxable income (UBTI) may be generated with respect to tax-exempt investors.

We do not intend or anticipate that the tax-exempt investors in the Partnership will be allocated income deemed to be derived from an unrelated trade
or business. Notwithstanding this, the General Partners do have limited authority to borrow funds deemed necessary:



| |  |  | to finance improvements necessary to protect capital previously invested in a property;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | to protect the value of our investment in a property; or
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | to make one of our properties more attractive for sale or lease.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------

Our General Partners have represented that they will not cause the Partnership to incur indebtedness unless they obtain an opinion from legal counsel or an opinion from our tax accountants that the proposed
indebtedness more likely than not will not cause the income allocable to tax-exempt investors to be characterized as UBTI. Any such opinion will have no binding effect on the IRS or any court, however, and some risk remains that we may generate UBTI
for our tax-exempt investors in the event that it becomes necessary for us to borrow funds.

Further, in the event we were deemed to be a
dealer in real property, defined as one who holds real estate primarily for sale to customers in the ordinary course of business, the gain realized on the sale of our properties which is allocable to tax-exempt investors would be
characterized as UBTI.



|ITEM 1B. | UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.
|-------- | --------------------------

There were no unresolved SEC staff
comments as of December 31, 2006.



Page 16



---

|ITEM 2. | PROPERTIES.
|------- | -----------

Overview

During the periods presented, the Partnership owned interests in the following joint ventures (the Joint Ventures) and properties:



|                                                                            |  |                                                                              |  |             |  |                                                                                                                                                 |  |                             |   |  |      |   |  |      |   |  |      |   |  |      |  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------- |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | --------------------------- | - |  | ---- | - |  | ---- | - |  | ---- | - |  | ---- | -
|                                                                            |  |                                                                              |  |             |  |                                                                                                                                                 |  | Leased % as of December 31, |  
|Joint Venture                                                               |  | Joint Venture Partners                                                       |  | Ownership % |  | Properties                                                                                                                                      |  | 2006                        |   |  | 2005 |   |  | 2004 |   |  | 2003 |   |  | 2002 |  
|Wells Fund XIII-REIT JointVenture Partnership (Fund XIII-REIT Associates) |  |   Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P.   Wells Operating Partnership, L.P.(1) |  | 28.1%71.9%  |  | 1. AmeriCredit Building(2) A two-story office building located in Orange Park, Florida                                                          |  |                            |   |  |     |   |  | 100  | % |  | 100  | % |  | 100  | %
|                                                                            |  |                                                                              |  |             |  | 2. 8560 Upland Drive (formerly known as the ADIC Buildings) Two connected one-story office and assembly buildings located in Parker, Colorado |  | 100                         | % |  | 100  | % |  | 100  | % |  | 100  | % |  | 100  | %
|                                                                            |  |                                                                              |  |             |  | 3. John Wiley Building(2) A four-story office building located in Fishers, Indiana                                                              |  |                            |   |  |     |   |  | 100  | % |  | 100  | % |  | 100  | %
|                                                                            |  |                                                                              |  |             |  | 4. AIU  Chicago Building A four-story office building located in Hoffman Estates, Illinois                                                     |  | 100                         | % |  | 100  | % |  | 100  | % |  | 98   | % |  |     |  
|Fund XIII and Fund XIV Associates (Fund XIII-XIV Associates)              |  |   Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P.   Wells Real Estate Fund XIV, L.P.     |  | 47.3%52.7%  |  | 5. Siemens  Orlando Building (Acquired on October 30, 2003) Two one-story office buildings located in Orlando, Florida                         |  | 100                         | % |  | 100  | % |  | 100  | % |  | 100  | % |  |     |  
|                                                                            |  |                                                                              |  |             |  | 6. Randstad  Atlanta Building (Acquired on December 19, 2003) Four-story office building located in Atlanta, Georgia                           |  | 100                         | % |  | 100  | % |  | 100  | % |  | 100  | % |  |     |  
|                                                                            |  |                                                                              |  |             |  | 7.7500 Setzler Parkway(3) (Acquired on March 26, 2004) One-story office and warehouse building located in Brooklyn Park, Minnesota              |  | 100                         | % |  | 100  | % |  | 100  | % |  |     |   |  |     |  



| | (1) | Wells Operating Partnership, L.P. (Wells OP) is a Delaware limited partnership with Wells
REIT serving as its general partner; Wells REIT is a Maryland corporation that qualifies as a real estate investment trust.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | These properties were sold in April 2005.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------



| | (3) | This property was sold in January 2007.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------

Wells Real Estate Fund XIV, L.P. is affiliated with the Partnership through common general partners. Each of the properties described above was acquired on an all-cash
basis.



Page 17



---

Lease Expirations

As
of December 31, 2006, the lease expirations scheduled during the following ten years for all properties in which the Partnership held an interest through the Joint Ventures, assuming no exercise of renewal options or termination rights, are
summarized below:



|                        |  |                          |  |                     |  |                                               |           |                                                                     |   |                                        |  |       |                                                                     |  |       |  
|----------------------- |  | ------------------------ |  | ------------------- |  | --------------------------------------------- | --------- | ------------------------------------------------------------------- | - | -------------------------------------- |  | ----- | ------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----- | -
|Year of LeaseExpiration |  | Number ofLeases Expiring |  | Square FeetExpiring |  | AnnualizedGross BaseRent in Year ofExpiration |           | PartnershipShare ofAnnualizedGross
BaseRent in Year ofExpiration(1) |   | Percentage ofTotal SquareFeet Expiring |  |       | Percentage of Total Annualized Gross Base Rent in Year ofExpiration | 
|2007(2)                 |  | 2                        |  | 42,748              |  | $                                             | 620,235   |                                                                     | $ | 205,405                                |  | 7.1   | %                                                                   |  | 8.8   | %
|2009(3)                 |  | 1                        |  | 52,125              |  |                                               | 785,837   |                                                                     |   | 371,701                                |  | 8.7   |                                                                     |  | 11.2  |  
|2010(4)                 |  | 2                        |  | 159,669             |  |                                               | 2,597,435 |                                                                     |   | 733,743                                |  | 26.6  |                                                                     |  | 36.9  |  
|2011(5)                 |  | 2                        |  | 268,204             |  |                                               | 2,094,819 |                                                                     |   | 710,442                                |  | 44.7  |                                                                     |  | 29.8  |  
|2013(6)                 |  | 2                        |  | 77,660              |  |                                               | 934,862   |                                                                     |   | 442,190                                |  | 12.9  |                                                                     |  | 13.3  |  
|                        |  |                          |  |                     |  |                                               |           |                                                                     |   |                                        |  |       |                                                                     |  |       |  
|                        |  | 9                        |  | 600,406             |  | $                                             | 7,033,188 |                                                                     | $ | 2,463,481                              |  | 100.0 | %                                                                   |  | 100.0 | %
|                        |  |                          |  |                     |  |                                               |           |                                                                     |   |                                        |  |       |                                                                     |  |       |  



| | (1) | The Partnerships share of annualized gross base rent in year of expiration is calculated based
on the Partnerships ownership percentage in the joint venture that owns the leased property.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | AIU  Chicago Building: Philips Electronics North America Corporation lease (approximately
32,900 square feet); Siemens  Orlando Building: two Cape Canaveral Tour and Travel, Inc. leases (approximately 9,900 square feet).
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (3) | Siemens  Orlando Building: Siemens Shared Services, LLC lease (approximately 52,100 square
feet).
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (4) | AIU  Chicago Building: American InterContinental University, Inc. lease (approximately 159,700
square feet); and Randstad  Atlanta Building: Airtouch Cellular of Georgia lease.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (5) | 8560 Upland Drive: Quantum
Corporation lease (approximately 148,200 square feet); and 7500 Setzler Parkway: FedEx SmartPost, Inc. lease (approximately 120,000 square feet).
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (6) | Siemens  Orlando Building: Rinker Materials of Florida, Inc. lease (approximately 13,100 square
feet); and Randstad  Atlanta Building: Randstad Staffing Solutions, L.P. lease (approximately 64,600 square feet).
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Property
Descriptions

The properties in which the Partnership owns an interest through the Joint Ventures during the periods presented are further described
below:

AmeriCredit Building

The AmeriCredit Building is a two-story office building containing approximately 85,000 rentable square feet located in Orange Park, Florida. On April 13, 2005, the Fund XIII-REIT Associates sold the AmeriCredit Building to an
unrelated third party, for a gross sale price of $14,444,000. As a result of the sale of the AmeriCredit Building, the Partnership received net sale proceeds of approximately $4,020,000 and was allocated a gain of approximately $666,000.

8560 Upland Drive

The 8560 Upland Drive
property consists of two one-story office buildings connected to a light assembly building containing approximately 148,000 rentable square feet located in Parker, Colorado. Additionally, Fund XIII-REIT Associates purchased an undeveloped 3.43-acre
tract of land immediately adjacent to 8560 Upland Drive. The 8560 Upland Drive property was under a lease agreement with Advanced Digital Information Corporation (ADIC) for the entire property, which commenced in December 2001 and was
set to expire on December 31, 2011. On July 31, 2006, ADIC assigned its lease rights to Quantum Corporation (Quantum). Quantum has the right to extend the lease for two additional five-year periods of time by giving written
notice to



Page 18



---

the landlord at least nine months prior to the expiration date of the then current lease term. As of December 31, 2006, the annualized base rent was
approximately $1,323,000, increasing approximately 2% annually each January through the expiration of the lease. The base rent payable for each extended term of the lease will be the then-current market rate. The annualized base rent in 2011 is
approximately $1,461,200.

John Wiley Building

The John Wiley Building is a four-story office building containing approximately 141,000 rentable square feet located in Fishers, Indiana. On April 13, 2005, Fund XIII-REIT Associates sold the John Wiley Building
to an unrelated third party, for a gross sale price of $21,530,000. As a result of the sale of the John Wiley Building, the Partnership received net sale proceeds of approximately $6,023,000 and was allocated a gain of approximately $1,392,000.

AIU  Chicago Building

The AIU  Chicago Building is a four-story office building containing approximately 194,000 rentable square feet located in Hoffman Estates, Illinois.

As of December 31, 2006, the AIU  Chicago Building is primarily leased under net lease agreements (i.e., operating costs and maintenance costs are paid by the tenants) with American InterContinental
University, Inc. (AIU) (approximately 159,700 square feet, or 82% of the property), and Philips Electronics North American Corporation (approximately 32,900 square feet, or 17% of the property). The remaining 1% of the building is leased
to Jones Lang LaSalle (1,200 square feet for the management office, expiring December 2025).

The two initial AIU leases, which include 40,650 square feet
and 33,603 square feet, commenced in May 2002 and were set to expire in June 2008. AIU entered into an additional lease that includes 4,380 square feet, which commenced in April 2003 and was also set to expire in June 2008. AIU entered into an
additional lease, containing 48,993 square feet, which commenced in July 2003 and expires in December 2010. AIU entered into an additional lease, containing 4,110 square feet, which commenced in May 2004 and also expires in December 2010. AIU
entered into an additional lease that includes 13,501 square feet, which commenced in February 2005 and was set to expire in October 2008. AIU entered into an additional lease that includes 7,177 square feet, which commenced in February 2005 was set
to expire in June 2008. In October 2005, AIU amended and combined all of the leases previously mentioned. The new cumulative lease for AIU expires on December 31, 2010. In June 2006, AIU assumed an additional 7,255 square feet, previously
leased to WFS Financial, which also expires on December 31, 2010. AIU has a right of first offer to lease additional space in the AIU  Chicago Building upon such space becoming available. The AIU lease prohibits Fund XIII-REIT Associates
from leasing any space in the AIU  Chicago Building to any business, which offers post-high school or corporate training as its primary function. As of December 31, 2006, the annual base rent payable under the AIU leases was
approximately $2,323,000. The annualized rent payable in 2010 for the AIU lease expiring is approximately $2,578,700.

Philips Electronics North America
Corporation (Philips North America) is a wholly owned subsidiary of Philips Holding USA Inc., which is a wholly owned subsidiary of Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. (Philips). Philips North America manages the North
American operations of Philips, a worldwide electronics manufacturer. Philips, whose shares are publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange, operates in over 60 countries. The Philips North America lease (the Philips Lease)
covers approximately 32,900 rentable square feet and commenced in July 2002 and expires in July 2007. As of December 31, 2006, the annual base rent payable under the Philips Lease was approximately $458,000 and will remain as such throughout
the remainder of the lease. Philips North America has the right, at its option, to extend the initial term of its lease for one additional three-year period at annual base rents per square foot of $14.50, $15.10, and $15.75, respectively.

Siemens  Orlando Building

The Siemens  Orlando Building is comprised of two single-story office buildings containing approximately 82,000 aggregate rentable square feet, on an approximately 7.5-acre tract of land located in Orlando, Florida. The



Page 19



---

Siemens  Orlando Building, which was completed in 2002, is under lease agreements with Siemens Shared Services, LLC (approximately 63%); Rinker
Materials of Florida, Inc. (approximately 16%); Cape Canaveral Tour & Travel, Inc. (approximately 12%); and Best Buy Stores, L.P. (approximately 9%). Siemens Shared Services LLC (Siemens) occupies approximately 52,100 rentable
square feet of the Siemens  Orlando Building. Siemens, a subsidiary of Siemens AG, provides accounting and human resources services to the operating subsidiaries of Siemens AG, including Siemens Corporation, the guarantor of the Siemens lease,
which conducts the American operations for Siemens AG. Siemens has its corporate headquarters in Iselin, New Jersey. Siemens AG is a worldwide electronics and electrical engineering company with corporate headquarters in Munich, Germany. The Siemens
lease commenced on October 1, 2002 and expires on September 30, 2009. Siemens has the right, at its option, to extend the initial term of its lease for two additional three-year periods at 95% of the then-current market rental rate.
Siemens has an option to lease additional space in the Siemens  Orlando Building upon such space becoming available and subject to first refusal rights of other tenants of the Siemens  Orlando Building. In addition, Siemens has the right
to terminate up to 25,000 rentable square feet of the Siemens lease in 2007 by paying a termination fee equal to $7.47 per rentable square foot terminated. As of December 31, 2006 the annual base rent payable under the Siemens lease was
approximately $748,000, increasing approximately 2.5% annually each October through the expiration of the lease. The annualized base rent payable in 2009 is approximately $786,000.

Rinker Materials of Florida, Inc. (Rinker) occupies approximately 13,100 rentable square feet of the Siemens  Orlando Building. Rinker is a privately held concrete company with corporate headquarters
in West Palm Beach, Florida. Rinker provides construction and building materials in Florida, Georgia, and South Carolina, including cement, aggregate, brick, glass block, reinforcing steel, construction chemicals, drywall, and fireplaces. Rinker is
a wholly owned subsidiary of Rinker Group Limited (Rinker Group), an Australian company with corporate headquarters in Chatswood, Australia. Rinker Group is a worldwide heavy building materials corporation. The Rinker lease commenced in
April 2003 and expires in April 2013. Rinker has the right, at its option, to extend the initial term of its lease for two additional five-year periods at the then-current market rental rate but not less than the base rent last payable under this
lease as renewed. In addition, Rinker has a right of first refusal to lease additional space in the Siemens  Orlando Building upon such space becoming available. As of December 31, 2006, the annual base rent payable under the Rinker lease
is approximately $186,000, increasing approximately 3% annually each April through the expiration of the lease. The annualized base rent payable in 2013 is approximately $222,000.

Cape Canaveral Tour and Travel, Inc. (Cape Canaveral) occupies approximately 9,900 rentable square feet of the Siemens  Orlando Building under two separate leases. Cape Canaveral is a subsidiary of
Kosmas Group International, Inc. (Kosmas), the guarantor of the Cape Canaveral leases. Kosmas is a vacation ownership company with corporate headquarters in New Smyrna Beach, Florida. Kosmas provides timeshare ownership of ten resorts in
New Smyrna Beach, two in Kissimmee, and one in Key West, Florida. The Cape Canaveral leases, which commenced in September 2002 and May 2003, expire in November 2007. Cape Canaveral has the right, at its option, to extend the initial term of its
leases for two additional five-year periods at the then-current market rental rate. As of December 31, 2006 the annual base rent payable under the Cape Canaveral Leases was approximately $157,000. The annualized base rent payable in 2007 is
approximately $162,000.

Best Buy Stores, L.P. (Best Buy) occupies approximately 7,100 rentable square feet of the Siemens  Orlando
Building. Best Buy is a wholly owned subsidiary of Best Buy Co., Inc. (Best Buy Co.). Best Buy Co. is a retailer of consumer electronics, personal computers, entertainment software, and appliances in North America. Best Buy Co., whose
shares are publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange, has its corporate headquarters located in Minneapolis, Minnesota. The Best Buy lease commenced in October 2001 and expired in November 2006; however, Best Buy continued to occupy the space
until January 2007 at a rate of 125% of base rent payable, which was approximately $14,000 per month.



Page 20



---

Randstad  Atlanta Building

The Randstad  Atlanta Building is a four-story office building containing approximately 65,000 aggregate rentable square feet, on an approximately 2.9-acre tract of
land located in Atlanta, Georgia. The Randstad  Atlanta Building, which was completed in 1985, is under a lease agreement with the sole tenant, Randstad Staffing Solutions, L.P. (Randstad), an affiliate of Randstad Holdings NV
(Randstad Holdings). Randstad Holdings, the guarantor of the Randstad lease, is an international supplier of temporary and contract staffing services. Randstad, which has its American headquarters in the Randstad  Atlanta Building,
manages the operations of Randstad Holdings in the United States and Canada. Randstad operates in five core areas, consisting of office, industrial, creative, technical, and professional services. The Randstad lease commenced on December 19,
2003 and expires on December 31, 2013. Randstad has the right, at its option, to extend the initial term of its lease for two additional five-year periods at 95% of the then-current market rental rate. In addition, Randstad has a right of first
refusal to purchase the Randstad  Atlanta Building should Fund XIII-XIV Associates decide to sell the Randstad  Atlanta Building in the future. Fund XIII-XIV Associates, as landlord, is responsible for the maintenance and repair of the
roof, plumbing, electrical, heating and air conditioning, exterior walls, doors, windows, corridors, and other common areas of the Randstad  Atlanta Building. As of December 31, 2006, the annual base rent payable under the Randstad lease
was approximately $646,000. Beginning in January 2009, the annual base rent payable increases approximately 2% annually each January through the expiration of the lease. The annualized base rent payable in 2013 is approximately $713,000.

7500 Setzler Parkway

The 7500 Setzler
Parkway property is a single-story office and warehouse building containing approximately 120,000 rentable square feet located on a 10.32-acre tract of land in Brooklyn Park, Minnesota. The 7500 Setzler Parkway building, which was completed in 2004,
was under a lease agreement with R.R. Donnelley & Sons Company (R.R. Donnelley) that commenced on January 1, 2004 and was set to expire on December 31, 2010. On July 5, 2006, R.R. Donnelley assigned its lease
rights to FedEx SmartPost, Inc. (FedEx). Under the terms of the assignment agreement, the lease term was extended until December 2011. The annual base rent payable under the lease was approximately $560,000 through December 2006 and
increased to $588,000 on January 1, 2007. On January 31, 2007, Fund XIII-XIV Associates sold 7500 Setzler Parkway to an unrelated third party for a gross sale price of $8,950,000. As a result of the sale, the Partnership received net sale
proceeds of approximately $4,126,000 and was allocated a gain of approximately $1,025,000.



|ITEM 3. | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
|------- | ------------------

From time to time, we are party to legal
proceedings which arise in the ordinary course of our business. We are not currently involved in any litigation for which the outcome would, in the judgment of the General Partners based on information currently available, have a materially adverse
impact on the results of operations or financial condition of the Partnership, nor is management aware of any such litigation threatened against us.



|ITEM 4. | SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.
|------- | ----------------------------------------------------

No matters
were submitted to a vote of the limited partners during the fourth quarter of 2006.



Page 21



---

PART II



|ITEM 5. | MARKET FOR PARTNERSHIPS UNITS AND RELATED SECURITY HOLDER MATTERS.
|------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------

Summary

As of February 28, 2007, 3,212,460 Cash Preferred Units and 559,588 Tax Preferred Units, held by a total of 1,267 and 139
limited partners, respectively, were outstanding. Capital contributions are equal to $10.00 per each limited partnership unit. A public trading market has not been established for the Partnerships limited partnership units, nor is such a
market anticipated to develop in the future. The partnership agreement provides the General Partners with the right to prohibit transfers of units under certain circumstances.

Unit Valuation

Because fiduciaries of retirement plans subject to the ERISA and IRA custodians are required to
determine and report the value of the assets held in their respective plans or accounts on an annual basis, the General Partners are required under the partnership agreement to report estimated unit values to the limited partners each year in the
Partnerships annual report on Form 10-K. The methodology to be utilized for determining such estimated unit values under the partnership agreement requires the General Partners to estimate the amount a unit holder would receive assuming that
the Partnerships properties were sold at their estimated fair market values as of the end of the Partnerships fiscal year and the proceeds therefrom (without any reduction for selling expenses) plus the amount of net sale proceeds held
by the Partnership at year-end from previous property sales, if any, were distributed to the limited partners in liquidation. The estimated unit valuations are intended to be an estimate of the distributions that would be made to limited partners
who purchased their units directly from the Partnership in the Partnerships original public offering of units, and who have made no conversion elections under the partnership agreement.

Utilizing the foregoing methodology and based upon market conditions existing in early December 2006, the General Partners have estimated the Partnerships unit
valuations, based upon their estimates of property values as of December 31, 2006, to be approximately $7.20 per Cash Preferred Unit and $8.19 per Tax Preferred Unit, based upon market conditions existing in early December 2006. These estimates
should not be viewed as an accurate reflection of the value of the limited partners units, what limited partners might be able to sell their units for, or the fair market value of the Partnerships properties, nor do they necessarily
represent the amount of net proceeds limited partners would receive if the Partnerships properties were sold and the proceeds distributed in a liquidation of the Partnership. There is no established public trading market for the
Partnerships limited partnership units, and it is not anticipated that a public trading market for the units will ever develop. In addition, property values are subject to change and could decline in the future. While, as required by the
partnership agreement, the General Partners have obtained an opinion from The David L. Beal Company, an independent appraiser certified by the Member Appraisal Institute, to the effect that such estimates of value were deemed reasonable and were
prepared in accordance with appropriate methods for valuing real estate, no actual appraisals were obtained due to the inordinate expense that would be involved in obtaining appraisals for all of the Partnerships properties.

The valuations performed by the General Partners are estimates only, and are based on a number of assumptions which may not be accurate or complete and may or may not be
applicable to any specific limited partnership units. For example, as a result of the availability of conversion elections under the partnership agreement and the resulting complexities involved relating to the distribution methodology under the
partnership agreement, each limited partnership unit of the Partnership potentially has its own unique characteristics as to distributions and value. These estimated valuations assume, and are applicable only to, limited partners who have made no
conversion elections under the partnership agreement and who purchased their units directly from the Partnership in the Partnerships original public offering of units. Further, as set forth above, no third-party appraisals have or will be
obtained. For these reasons, the estimated unit valuations set forth above should not be used by or relied



Page 22



---

upon by investors, other than fiduciaries of retirement plans and IRA custodians for limited ERISA and IRA reporting purposes, as any indication of the fair
market value of their units. In addition, it should be noted that ERISA plan fiduciaries and IRA custodians may use estimated unit valuations obtained from other sources, such as prices paid for the Partnerships units in secondary market
trades, and that such estimated unit valuations may well be lower than those estimated by the General Partners using the methodology required by the partnership agreement.

It should also be noted that once the Partnership begins the process of selling certain of its properties and that as properties are sold and the net proceeds from property sales are distributed to limited partners,
the remaining value of the Partnerships portfolio of properties, and resulting value of Partnerships limited partnership units, will naturally decline. In considering the foregoing estimated unit valuations, it should be noted that the
Partnership has previously distributed net sale proceeds in the amount of $2.33 per Cash Preferred Unit and $4.58 per Tax Preferred Unit to its limited partners. These amounts are intended to represent the per-unit distributions received by limited
partners who purchased their units directly from the Partnership in the Partnerships original public offering of units, and who have made no conversion elections under the partnership agreement. Limited partners who have made one or more
conversion elections would have received a different level of per-unit distribution.

Operating Distributions

Operating cash available for distribution to the limited partners is generally distributed on a quarterly basis. Under the partnership agreement, distributions from net
cash from operations are allocated first to the limited partners holding Cash Preferred Units (and limited partners holding Tax Preferred Units that have elected a conversion right that allows them to share in the distribution rights of limited
partners holding Cash Preferred Units) until they have received 10% of their adjusted capital contributions. Cash available for distribution is then distributed to the General Partners until they have received an amount equal to 10% of cash
distributions previously distributed to the limited partners. Any remaining cash available for distribution is split between the limited partners holding Cash Preferred Units and the General Partners on a basis of 90% and 10%, respectively.

Operating cash distributions made to limited partners holding Cash Preferred Units during 2005 and 2006 are summarized below:



|                                         |  |                                 |         |                  |   |                   |  |                 |      |  |   |     
|---------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------- | ------- | ---------------- | - | ----------------- |  | --------------- | ---- |  | - | ----
|                                         |  | Per Cash Preferred Unit         |         |                  |   |                  
|                                         |  |                                 |         |                 
|Operating Distributions forQuarter Ended |  | Total OperatingCash Distributed |         | InvestmentIncome |   | Return of Capital |  | GeneralPartners
|March 31, 2005                           |  | $                               | 624,460 |                  | $ | 0.20              |  | $               | 0.00 |  | $ | 0.00
|June 30, 2005                            |  | $                               | 392,300 |                  | $ | 0.13              |  | $               | 0.00 |  | $ | 0.00
|September 30, 2005                       |  | $                               | 510,165 |                  | $ | 0.16              |  | $               | 0.00 |  | $ | 0.00
|December 31, 2005                        |  | $                               | 473,594 |                  | $ | 0.15              |  | $               | 0.00 |  | $ | 0.00
|March 31, 2006                           |  | $                               | 462,099 |                  | $ | 0.14              |  | $               | 0.00 |  | $ | 0.00
|June 30, 2006                            |  | $                               | 465,282 |                  | $ | 0.14              |  | $               | 0.00 |  | $ | 0.00
|September 30, 2006                       |  | $                               | 403,246 |                  | $ | 0.13              |  | $               | 0.00 |  | $ | 0.00
|December 31, 2006                        |  | $                               | 464,806 |                  | $ | 0.14              |  | $               | 0.00 |  | $ | 0.00

Fourth quarter 2006 operating distributions were accrued for accounting purposes in 2006 and paid to the Cash
Preferred limited partners in February 2007. No operating cash distributions were paid to holders of Tax Preferred Units or to the General Partners during the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005.



Page 23



---

|ITEM 6. | SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.
|------- | ------------------------

A summary of the selected financial data
as of and for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, 2004, 2003, and 2002 for the Partnership is provided below. The comparability of net income for the periods presented below is impacted by the sale of properties described in
Item 2.



|                                                                                       |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |  |   |            |   |  |      |            |   |  |   |            |  
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ---------- | - | ---- | - | ---------- |  | - | ---------- | - |  | ---- | ---------- | - |  | - | ---------- | -
|                                                                                       |  | 2006 |            |   | 2005 |   | 2004       |  |   | 2003       |   |  | 2002 |           
|Total assets                                                                           |  | $    | 20,961,702 |   |      | $ | 21,981,962 |  | $ | 31,129,562 |   |  | $    | 32,516,654 |   |  | $ | 23,930,275 |  
|Equity in income of Joint Ventures                                                     |  | $    | 925,459    |   |      | $ | 3,023,505  |  | $ | 1,106,316  |   |  | $    | 931,683    |   |  | $ | 531,457    |  
|Net income                                                                             |  | $    | 789,548    |   |      | $ | 3,028,062  |  | $ | 954,373    |   |  | $    | 888,403    |   |  | $ | 478,385    |  
|Net loss allocated to General Partners                                                 |  | $    | 0          |   |      | $ | 0          |  | $ | 0          |   |  | $    | 0          |   |  | $ | 0          |  
|Net income (loss) allocated to Limited Partners:                                       |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |  |   |            |   |  |      |            |   |  |   |            |  
|Cash Preferred                                                                         |  | $    | 1,756,977  |   |      | $ | 2,295,882  |  | $ | 2,583,944  |   |  | $    | 1,627,786  |   |  | $ | 795,851    |  
|Tax Preferred                                                                          |  | $    | (967,429   | ) |      | $ | 732,180    |  | $ | (1,629,571 | ) |  | $    | (739,383   | ) |  | $ | (317,466   | )
|Net income (loss) per weighted-averageLimited Partner Unit:                            |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |  |   |            |   |  |      |            |   |  |   |            |  
|Cash Preferred                                                                         |  |      | $ 0.55     |   |      |   | $0.73      |  |   | $ 0.83     |   |  |      | $ 0.56     |   |  |   | $ 0.52     |  
|Tax Preferred                                                                          |  |      | $(1.75     | ) |      |   | $1.18      |  |   | $(2.42     | ) |  |      | $(1.09     | ) |  |   | $(1.02     | )
|Operating Cash Distributions per weighted-average Cash Preferred Limited Partner Unit: |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |  |   |            |   |  |      |            |   |  |   |            |  
|Investment Income                                                                      |  |      | $ 0.56     |   |      |   | $0.64      |  |   | $ 0.81     |   |  |      | $ 0.53     |   |  |   | $ 0.50     |  
|Return of Capital                                                                      |  |      | $ 0.00     |   |      |   | $0.00      |  |   | $ 0.00     |   |  |      | $ 0.00     |   |  |   | $ 0.00     |  
|Operating Cash Distributions per weighted-average Tax Preferred Limited Partner Unit:  |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |  |   |            |   |  |      |            |   |  |   |            |  
|Investment Income                                                                      |  |      | $ 0.00     |   |      |   | $0.00      |  |   | $ 0.00     |   |  |      | $ 0.00     |   |  |   | $ 0.00     |  
|Return of Capital                                                                      |  |      | $ 0.00     |   |      |   | $0.00      |  |   | $ 0.00     |   |  |      | $ 0.00     |   |  |   | $ 0.00     |  
|Distribution of net sale proceeds per weighted-average Limited Partner Unit:           |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |  |   |            |   |  |      |            |   |  |   |            |  
|Cash Preferred                                                                         |  |      | $ 0.00     |   |      |   | $2.35      |  |   | $ 0.00     |   |  |      | $ 0.00     |   |  |   | $ 0.00     |  
|Tax Preferred                                                                          |  |      | $ 0.00     |   |      |   | $4.15      |  |   | $ 0.00     |   |  |      | $ 0.00     |   |  |   | $ 0.00     |  



|ITEM 7. | MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
|------- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the Selected Financial Data presented in Item 6 and our accompanying financial statements and notes thereto. See also Cautionary Note
Regarding Forward-Looking Statements preceding Part I of this report and Risk Factors in Item 1A. of this report.

Overview

Portfolio Overview

We are currently in the holding
phase of our life cycle. We now own interests in four properties, following the sale of 7500 Setzler Parkway in the first quarter of 2007. Our remaining four properties are leased to tenants primarily in the beginning to middle of their lease
terms. Our focus in the near-term is to maintain the high occupancy level of the portfolio and maximize operating performance in each of the assets.

The
sale of 7500 Setzler Parkway capitalized on the recent lease with FedEx. We also wanted to take advantage of the current capital markets environment and the strong demand for industrial product, as reflected in the significant increase in value over
the holding period.

Operating distributions payable to the limited partners holding Cash Preferred Units for the fourth quarter 2006 increased compared to
the third quarter as a result of funding some re-leasing costs during the third quarter 2006. We anticipate that operating distributions may decline or remain at similar levels during 2007, due to generating



Page 24



---

less operating cash flow, partially offset by earning additional interest income on net sale proceeds, as a result of the sale of 7500 Setzler Parkway. Our
General Partners anticipate distributing net sale proceeds of approximately $4,150,000 to the limited partners in August 2007 from the sales of the AmeriCredit Building, the John Wiley Building, and 7500 Setzler Parkway.

Property Summary

As we continue to operate in the holding phase, we
will continue to focus on re-leasing vacant space and space that may become vacant upon the expiration of our current leases. In doing so, we will seek to maximize returns to the limited partners by negotiating long-term leases at market rental
rates while attempting to minimize down time, re-leasing expenditures, ongoing property level costs and portfolio costs. Later as we move into the positioning-for-sale and disposition-and-liquidation phases, our attention will shift to locating
suitable buyers and negotiating purchase-sale contracts that will attempt to maximize the total return to the limited partners, and minimize contingencies and our post-closing involvement with the buyer.

Information relating to the properties owned, or previously owned, by the Joint Ventures is provided below:



| |  |  | The AmeriCredit Building was sold on April 13, 2005.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | The John Wiley Building was sold on April 13, 2005.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | The 7500 Setzler Parkway building was sold on January 31, 2007.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | 8560 Upland Drive, located in Parker, Colorado, is 100% leased until 2011.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | The AIU  Chicago Building is located in Hoffman Estates, Illinois, a suburb of Chicago. This asset was acquired in September 2003 and is now 100% leased to
multiple tenants, as a result of AIU having expanded into the remaining vacant space. Lease expirations for the property occur from 2007 to 2010.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | The Siemens  Orlando Building is located in Orlando, Florida. This asset was acquired in October 2003 and is currently 91% leased to three tenants. The major
lease to Siemens extends to 2009.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | The Randstad  Atlanta Building is located in Atlanta, Georgia. This asset was acquired in December 2003 and is 100% leased to Randstad until 2013.
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Industry Factors

Our results
continue to be impacted by a number of factors influencing the real estate industry.

General Economic Conditions and Real Estate Market
Commentary

The General Partners review a number of economic forecasts and market commentaries in order to evaluate general economic
conditions and formulate a view of the current environments effect on the real estate markets in which we operate.

The U.S. economy
has grown at a rate of 3.4% in 2006, which is up slightly from 3.2% growth in 2005. The economy grew at a 3.5% annual pace in the fourth quarter, up from 2.2% in the previous quarter. This slowdown of growth in the third quarter is primarily
attributable to housing, with residential investment falling 19.0%, the worst decrease in over a decade. This weakness in the housing sector was offset by fourth quarter growth in personal consumption expenditures, which rose 4.4% in the quarter and
contributed 3.1% to gross domestic product (GDP). GDP growth for 2007 is expected to be 2.5% with estimated inflation at 2.0%.

The U.S. office real estate market is continuing to display strong growth through the first quarter of 2007, with steady declines in vacancy, positive absorption rates, and moderate construction. These conditions are creating an
acceleration in rent growth across most markets. National vacancy rates continue to trend downward with fourth quarter vacancy at 12.5%, down 35 basis points from the third quarter and 105 basis points from one year ago. Many markets are performing
well due to job growth in the service sector and a



Page 25



---

restraint on new supply. Improved job growth is not seen across the board, however, with coastal and energy markets doing well and the Midwest slightly
lagging. A four-quarter average puts job growth at 2.5% since midyear 2005, which is reflected in steady positive absorption. Looking forward to the near-term, many economists anticipate that there may be a slowing in the economy due to a further
housing correction, causing weaker employment growth and a downturn in demand for consumer-related finance. Such a slowing would also slow the growth in rental rates.

The real estate capital transactions market experienced a strong finish to the year with $45 billion of office properties changing hands in the fourth quarter. Office property sales in 2006 totaled $134 billion, an
increase of 32% over prior year sales. Real estate investment trust privatizations, the process of publicly traded real estate investment trusts becoming privately held through merger or acquisition, accounted for $18 billion of volume in 2006.
Capitalization rates (cap rates) for central business district properties are at an all-time low due to strong investor demand. Demand for office properties continues to be well distributed across the capital sector with equity funds,
institutions, real estate investment trusts, and foreign investors being the most competitive bidders for portfolios. A different capital sector has led acquisitions for each of the past four years, a further indication of the diversity of demand.
Equity funds have replaced institutions as the largest purchaser of office properties in 2006. The spread between average cap rates and 10-year U.S. Treasuries continues to tighten, as cap rates compress and the U.S. Treasury inches up from 2002
lows. In the medium-term, the combination of higher interest rates and slower rent growth could spell the end of the cap rate compression with cap rates expected to slightly increase over the next three years.

Impact of Economic Conditions on our Portfolio

While some of the market conditions noted above may indicate an expected increase in rental rates, the extent to which our portfolio may benefit from this growth is dependent upon the contractual rental rates
currently provided in existing leases at the properties we own. As the majority of our in-place leases are at properties that were acquired at times during which the market demanded higher rental rates, as compared with today, new leasing activities
in certain markets could actually result in a decrease in future rental rates.

Real Estate Funds with Current Vacancy or Near-term
Rollover Exposure

Real estate funds, such as the Partnership, that contain properties with current vacancies or near-term tenant
rollover may still face a challenging leasing environment. The properties within these funds will generally face lower rents and higher concession packages to the tenants in order to re-lease vacant space.

From a valuation standpoint, it is generally preferable to either renew an existing tenant lease or re-lease the property prior to marketing it for sale.
Generally, buyers will heavily discount their offering prices to compensate for existing or pending vacancies.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Overview

Our operating strategy entails funding
expenditures related to the recurring operations of the Joint Ventures properties and the portfolio with operating cash flows, including current and prior period operating distributions received from the Joint Ventures, and assessing the
amount of remaining cash flows that will be required to fund known future re-leasing costs and other capital improvements. Any residual operating cash flows are generally considered available for distribution to the Cash Preferred limited partners
and, unless reserved, are generally paid quarterly. As a result, the ongoing monitoring of our cash position is critical to ensuring that adequate liquidity and capital resources are available. Economic downturns in one or more of our core markets
could adversely impact the ability of our tenants to honor lease payments and our ability to re-lease space on favorable terms as leases expire or space otherwise becomes vacant. In the event of either situation, cash flows and, consequently, our
ability to provide funding for capital needs could be adversely affected.



Page 26



---

Short-Term Liquidity

During the year ended December 31, 2006, we generated net operating cash flows, including operating distributions received from the Joint Ventures, of approximately $1,744,000. Such operating cash flows and cash on hand were used to
fund operating distributions to limited partners of approximately $1,804,000 to limited partners during 2006. Operating distributions from the Joint Ventures are generally representative of rental revenues and tenant reimbursements, less property
operating expenses, management fees, general administrative expenses, and capital expenditures. During 2006, the majority of such operating cash flows were used to pay operating distributions to limited partners. Future operating distributions paid
to limited partners will be largely dependent upon the amount of cash generated from the Joint Ventures, our expectations of future cash flows, and determination of near-term cash needs for tenant re-leasing costs and other capital improvements for
properties owned by the Joint Ventures. We anticipate future operating distributions from the Joint Ventures may decline in the near-term as a result of funding our pro-rata share of anticipated capital expenditures at the Siemens  Orlando
Building and reduced cash flows from the sale of 7500 Setzler Parkway in the first quarter of 2007.

At this time, we expect to continue to generate cash
flows from operations, including distributions from the Joint Ventures, sufficient to cover our estimated future expenses. We also believe that the cash on hand and operating distributions due from the Joint Ventures are sufficient to cover our
working capital needs, including liabilities of approximately $516,000, as of December 31, 2006.

Long-Term Liquidity

We expect that our future sources of capital will be primarily derived from operating cash flows generated from the Joint Ventures and net proceeds generated from the
selective and strategic sale of properties. Our future long-term liquidity requirements will include, but not be limited to, funding tenant improvements, renovations, expansions, and other significant capital improvements necessary for properties
owned through the Joint Ventures. We expect to continue to use substantially all future net cash flows from operations to provide funding for such requirements. Future cash flows from operating activities will be primarily affected by distributions
received from the Joint Ventures, which are dependent upon net operating income generated by the Joint Ventures properties, less reserves for known capital expenditures.

Capital Resources

The Partnership is an investment vehicle formed for the purpose of acquiring, owning, and
operating income-producing real properties, or investing in joint ventures formed for the same purpose, and has invested all of the partners original capital contributions. Thus, it is unlikely that we will acquire interests in any additional
properties or joint ventures. Historically, our investment strategy has generally involved acquiring properties that are pre-leased to creditworthy tenants on an all-cash basis through joint ventures with affiliated partnerships.

The Joint Ventures fund capital expenditures primarily related to building improvements for the purpose of maintaining the quality of their properties, and tenant
improvements for the purpose of readying their properties for re-leasing. As leases expire, we will work with the Joint Ventures to attempt to re-lease space to an existing tenant or market the space to prospective new tenants. Generally, tenant
improvements funded in connection with lease renewals require less capital than those funded in connection with new leases. However, external conditions, such as the supply of and demand for comparable space available within a given market, drive
capital costs as well as rental rates. Any capital or other expenditures not provided for by the operations of the Joint Ventures will be funded by the Partnership and respective joint venture partners on a pro-rata basis.

Operating cash flows, if available, are generally distributed from the Joint Ventures to the Partnership following each calendar quarter-end. Our cash management policy
typically includes first utilizing current period operating



Page 27



---

cash flow until depleted, at which point operating reserves are utilized to fund capital and other required expenditures. In the event that current and prior
period accumulated operating cash flows are insufficient to fund such costs, net property sale proceeds reserves, if available, would then be utilized.

As
of December 31, 2006, we have received, used, distributed, and held net sale proceeds allocated to the Partnership from the sale of properties as presented below:



|                                   |  |             |  |                                     |  |                                         |            |                          |   |                                                                  |  |                                                        |  |   |            |  |   |       
|---------------------------------- |  | ----------- |  | ----------------------------------- |  | --------------------------------------- | ---------- | ------------------------ | - | ---------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------ |  | - | ---------- |  | - | ------
|Property Sold                      |  | NetProceeds |  | PartnershipsApproximateOwnership % |  | Net ProceedsAllocated to thePartnership |            | Use of Net Sale Proceeds |   | Net Sale Proceeds Distributed toPartners as of December 31, 2006 |  | Undistributed NetSale Proceeds as of December 31, 2006
|                                   |  |             |  | Amount                              |  | Purpose                                 |            |                         
|                                   |  |             |  |                                     |  |                                         |           
|AmeriCredit Building(sold in 2005) |  | $14,301,802 |  | 28.11%                              |  | $                                       | 4,020,236  |                          | $ | 0                                                                |  |                                                       |  | $ | 4,002,754  |  | $ | 17,482
|                                   |  |             |  |                                     |  |                                         |           
|John Wiley Building(sold in 2005)  |  | $21,427,599 |  | 28.11%                              |  |                                         | 6,023,298  |                          |   | 0                                                                |  |                                                       |  |   | 5,997,246  |  |   | 26,052
|                                   |  |             |  |                                     |  |                                         |            |                          |   |                                                                  |  |                                                        |  |   |            |  |   |       
|                                   |  |             |  |                                     |  |                                         |           
|Total                              |  |             |  |                                     |  | $                                       | 10,043,534 |                          | $ | 0                                                                |  |                                                        |  | $ | 10,000,000 |  | $ | 43,534
|                                   |  |             |  |                                     |  |                                         |            |                          |   |                                                                  |  |                                                        |  |   |            |  |   |       

After year-end we received approximately $4.1 million of net sale proceeds from the January 2007 sale of 7500
Setzler Parkway.Our General Partners anticipate distributing net sale proceeds of approximately $4.15 million in August 2007 from the sales of the AmeriCredit Building, the John Wiley Building, and 7500 Setzler Parkway, as further discussed
below.

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

In
March 2007, our General Partners announced their intention to distribute net sale proceeds from the sales of the AmeriCredit Building, the John Wiley Building, and 7500 Setzler Parkway of approximately $4.15 million in August 2007 to the limited
partners of record as of June 30, 2007, which, under the terms of the partnership agreement, does not include limited partners acquiring units after March 31, 2007.

This distribution has not been formally declared by our General Partners. In accordance with the terms of the partnership agreement, our General Partners may elect to retain reserves deemed reasonably necessary for
the Partnership in the sole discretion of the General Partners. Thus, should a change in circumstances prior to the intended distribution date require the General Partners to reevaluate the Partnerships reserve requirements, it is possible
that this distribution may not occur or that such distribution could be made at a lower amount.

Results of Operations

Comparison of the year ended December 31, 2006 vs. the year ended December 31, 2005

Equity in Income of Joint Ventures

Equity
in income of Joint Ventures was $925,459 and $3,023,505 for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The 2006 decrease is primarily attributable to (i) gains recognized on the sales of the AmeriCredit Building and the John
Wiley Building in April 2005, (ii) a decline in operating income resulting from the aforementioned sales, (iii) incurring amortization of deferred leasing costs related to the lease assignment at 7500 Setzler Parkway in July 2006,
partially offset by (iv) an increase in interest income earned by the Joint Ventures in 2006, (v) an increase in rental revenue at 7500 Setzler Parkway resulting from the lease assignment in the third quarter 2006, (vi) an adjustment
in the first quarter of 2006 at 7500 Setzler Parkway and second quarter of 2006 at the Siemens  Orlando Building related to prior year operating expense reimbursement. Tenants are billed for operating expense reimbursements based on estimates,
which are reconciled in the following calendar year based on actual costs incurred and the terms of the corresponding tenant leases. We anticipate equity in income of Joint Ventures to increase in the first quarter as a result of the gain on the
sale of 7500 Setzler Parkway in January 2007.



Page 28



---

Expenses

Total expenses were $139,292 and $163,954 for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The 2006 decrease is primarily attributable to a decline in administrative costs and legal fees relative to
the decrease in the size of the portfolio as a result of the sales of properties.

We anticipate increases in our administrative expenses in future periods
resulting from increased costs relating to compliance with reporting and regulatory requirements.

Interest and Other
Income

Interest and other income was $3,381 and $168,511 for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The 2006 decrease is primarily
a result of a decrease in the average amount of net sale proceeds held during the respective periods. Future levels of interest income will be largely dependent upon the level of net sale proceeds held based on the timing of future dispositions and
net sale proceeds distributions to the limited partners.

Comparison of the year ended December 31, 2005 vs. the year ended December 31, 2004

Equity in Income of Joint Ventures

Equity in income of Joint Ventures was $3,023,505 and $1,106,316 for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The 2005 increase is primarily attributable to (i) the gains recognized as a
result of the sales of the AmeriCredit Building and the John Wiley Building in April 2005, (ii) an increase in earnings generated by Fund XIII-XIV Associates due to the acquisition of 7500 Setzler Parkway on March 26, 2004,
(iii) a reduction in depreciation expense as a result of changing the estimated weighted-average composite useful life from 25 years to 40 years for all the buildings owned through the Joint Ventures effective July 1, 2004, partially
offset by (iv) a reduction in operating income as a result of the sales of the AmeriCredit Building and the John Wiley Building in April 2005.

Expenses

Total expenses were relatively stable at $163,954 and $164,408 for the years ended December 31, 2005 and
2004, respectively.

Interest and Other Income

Interest and other income was $168,511 and $12,465 for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, respectively. The 2005 increase is primarily a result of an increase in the average amount of net sale proceeds
held during 2005 as a result of the sales of the AmeriCredit Building and the John Wiley Building in April 2005 and an increase in the daily interest yield.

Inflation

We are exposed to inflation risk as income from long-term leases is the primary source of our cash flows from operations. There
are provisions in the majority of our tenant leases that would protect us from the impact of inflation. These provisions include rent steps, reimbursement billings for operating expense pass-through charges, real estate tax and insurance
reimbursements on a per-square-foot basis, or in some cases, annual reimbursement of operating expenses above a certain per-square-foot allowance. However, due to the long-term nature of our leases, the leases may not readjust their reimbursement
rates frequently enough to cover inflation.

Application of Critical Accounting Policies

Our accounting policies have been established to conform with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). The preparation of financial statements in
conformity with GAAP requires management to use



Page 29



---

judgment in the application of accounting policies, including making estimates and assumptions. These judgments affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. If managements judgment or interpretation of the facts and
circumstances relating to various transactions had been different, it is possible that different accounting policies would have been applied, thus resulting in a different presentation of the financial statements. Additionally, other companies may
utilize different estimates that may impact comparability of our results of operations to those of companies in similar businesses.

Below is a discussion
of the accounting policies that management considers to be critical in that they may require complex judgment in their application or require estimates about matters that are inherently uncertain.

Investment in Real Estate Assets

We are required to make subjective
assessments as to the useful lives of depreciable assets. We consider the period of future benefit of the asset to determine the appropriate useful lives. These assessments have a direct impact on net income. The estimated useful lives of the Joint
Ventures assets by class are as follows:



|                        |  |                                       
|----------------------- |  | --------------------------------------
|Buildings               |  | 40 years                              
|Building improvements   |  | 5-25 years                            
|Land improvements       |  | 20 years                              
|Tenant improvements     |  | Shorter of lease term or economic life
|Intangible lease assets |  | Lease term                            

Effective July 1, 2004, the Joint Ventures extended the weighted-average composite useful life for all
building assets from 25 years to 40 years. We believe that this change more appropriately reflects the estimated useful lives of real estate assets and is consistent with prevailing industry practice. The change resulted in an increase to net income
of approximately $185,000 for the year ended December 31, 2004. In the event that the Joint Ventures utilize inappropriate useful lives or methods of depreciation, our net income would be misstated.

Valuation of Real Estate Assets

We continually monitor events and
changes in circumstances that could indicate that the carrying amounts of the real estate assets in which we have an ownership interest through investments in the Joint Ventures may not be recoverable. When indicators of potential impairment are
present which indicate that the carrying amounts of real estate assets may not be recoverable, management assesses the recoverability of the real estate assets by determining whether the carrying value of the real estate assets will be recovered
through the undiscounted future operating cash flows expected from the use of the assets and their eventual disposition. In the event that such expected undiscounted future cash flows do not exceed the carrying value, management adjusts the real
estate assets to the fair value, as defined by Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, and recognizes an impairment loss. Estimated fair
values are calculated based on the following information, dependent upon availability, in order of preference: (i) recently quoted market prices, (ii) market prices for comparable properties, or (iii) the present value of undiscounted
cash flows, including estimated salvage value. We have determined that there has been no impairment in the carrying value of real estate assets we held as of December 31, 2006.

Projections of expected future cash flows require management to estimate future market rental income amounts subsequent to the expiration of current lease agreements, property operating expenses, discount rates, the
number of months it takes to re-lease the property, and the number of years the property is held for investment. The use of inappropriate assumptions in the future cash flow analysis would result in an incorrect assessment of the propertys
future cash flows and fair value, and could result in the overstatement of the carrying value of real estate assets held by the Joint Ventures and net income of the Partnership.



Page 30



---

Allocation of Purchase Price of Acquired Assets

On January 1, 2002, the Partnership adopted SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations, and SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Intangibles. These standards govern business combinations, asset
acquisitions, and the accounting for acquired intangibles.

Upon the acquisition of real properties, it is the Partnerships policy to allocate the
purchase price of properties to acquired tangible assets, consisting of land and building, and identified intangible assets and liabilities, consisting of the value of above-market and below-market leases, and the value of in-place leases, based in
each case on their estimated fair values.

The fair values of the tangible assets of an acquired property (which includes land and building) are determined
by valuing the property as if it were vacant, and the as-if-vacant value is then allocated to land and building based on managements determination of the relative fair value of these assets. Management determines the as-if-vacant
fair value of a property using methods similar to those used by independent appraisers. Factors considered by management in performing these analyses include an estimate of carrying costs during the expected lease-up periods considering current
market conditions and costs to execute similar leases. In estimating carrying costs, management includes real estate taxes, insurance, and other operating expenses during the expected lease-up periods based on current market demand. Management
estimates costs to execute similar leases including leasing commissions, and other related costs.

The fair values of above-market and below-market
in-place leases are recorded based on the present value (using an interest rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases and
(ii) managements estimate of fair market lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases, measured over a period equal to the remaining terms of the leases. The capitalized above-market and below-market lease values are recorded as
intangible lease assets or liabilities and amortized as an adjustment to rental income over the remaining terms of the respective leases.

The fair values
of in-place leases include direct lease origination costs associated with obtaining a new tenant, absorption period costs associated with lost rentals which are avoided by acquiring an in-place lease, and tenant relationships. Direct lease
origination costs associated with obtaining a new tenant include commissions, tenant improvements, and other direct costs and are estimated based on managements consideration of current market costs to execute a similar lease. These direct
lease origination costs are amortized to expense over the remaining terms of the respective leases. The value of absorption period costs is calculated using the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases over a market absorption
period for a similar lease. Customer relationships are valued based on expected renewal of a lease or the likelihood of obtaining a particular tenant for other locations. These lease intangibles are amortized to expense over the remaining terms of
the respective leases. Beginning on April 1, 2004, these lease intangibles were amortized to expense rather than as an adjustment to rental income.

Estimates of the fair values of the tangible and intangible assets requires us to estimate market lease rates, property operating expenses, carrying costs during lease-up periods, discount rates, market absorption periods, and the number of
years the property is held for investment. The use of inappropriate estimates would result in an incorrect assessment of the Partnerships purchase price allocations, which could impact the amount of the Partnerships reported net income.

Related-Party Transactions and Agreements

We have
entered into agreements with Wells Capital, Wells Management, an affiliate of our General Partners, and their affiliates, whereby we pay certain fees and expense reimbursements to Wells Capital, Wells Management and their affiliates for asset
management; the management and leasing of our properties; administrative services relating to accounting, property management, and other partnership administration; and incur the related expenses. See Item 13, Certain Relationships and
Related Transactions for a description of these fees and reimbursements and amounts incurred and Risk Factors  Conflicts of Interest in Item 1A. of this report.



Page 31



---

Potential Tax Impact for Limited Partners Holding Tax Preferred Units  American Jobs Creation Act of 2004

The American Jobs Creation Act of 2004 added Section 470 to the Internal Revenue Code, which provides for certain limitations on the utilization
of losses by investors that are attributable to leased property owned by a partnership having both taxable and tax-exempt partners such as the Partnership. Under the limitations of Section 470, passive losses allocable to limited partners are
only able to be utilized to offset passive income generated from the same property or potentially from properties owned by the same partnership. In March 2005, the IRS announced that it would not apply Section 470 to partnerships for the
taxable year 2004 based solely on the fact that a partnership had both taxable and tax-exempt partners. In December 2005, the IRS extended the period for this transitional relief through the 2005 tax year, and in December 2006, the IRS again
extended the period for transitional relief through all tax years beginning prior to January 1, 2007. In addition, pursuant to Section 403(ff) of the Gulf Opportunity Zone Act of 2005, the effective date provisions regarding the
applicability of Section 470 were amended to provide that, in the case of leased property treated as tax-exempt use property by reason of its being owned by a partnership having both taxable and tax-exempt partners, Section 470 will apply
only to property acquired after March 12, 2004. Thus, we do not believe that the provisions of Section 470 should apply to limit the utilization of losses attributable to the properties owned by the Partnership which were acquired prior to
March 12, 2004; however, due to the uncertainties and lack of guidance relating to this provision, it is unclear as to whether the acquisition of a limited partnership interest in the Partnership after the March 12, 2004 effective date may
be deemed to be an acquisition of property within the meaning of the effective date provisions of Section 470. In addition, since the Partnership acquired its interest in 7500 Setzler Parkway after March 12, 2004, unless further
legislation is enacted to address this issue, or some other form of relief from the provisions of Section 470 is granted, beginning in tax year 2007 and thereafter, passive losses allocable to limited partners holding Tax Preferred Units
attributable to 7500 Setzler Parkway may only be used to offset passive income generated from such property (or potentially from other properties owned by the Partnership). Due to the technical nature of the Section 470 provisions and the
recent effective date amendment language, as applicable to partnerships having both taxable and tax-exempt partners, and the lack of interpretive guidance available thereunder either by Regulation or administrative ruling, it is unclear whether
tax-exempt use losses attributable to Partnership properties acquired after the effective date of Section 470 can be utilized to off-set any net income allocable to Partnership properties acquired prior to such effective date.

Subsequent Events

Property Sale

On January 31, 2007, Fund XIII-XIV Associates sold 7500 Setzler Parkway to an unrelated third party for a gross sales price of $8,950,000. As a result of the sale,
the Partnership received net sale proceeds of approximately $4,126,000 and was allocated a gain of approximately $1,025,000, which may be adjusted as additional information becomes available in subsequent periods.

Purchase and Sale Agreement

On March 19, 2007, Fund XIII-XIV
Associates entered into a purchase and sale agreement to sell the Randstad  Atlanta Building to an unrelated third party. The completion of this transaction is currently subject to, among other things, a due diligence period expiring on
April 2, 2007. Accordingly, there are no assurances that this sale will be completed. If the transaction progresses, the Partnership believes the closing of this transaction is likely to occur during the second quarter of 2007.



|ITEM 7A. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
|-------- | -----------------------------------------------------------

Since
we do not borrow any money, make any foreign investments or invest in any market risk- sensitive instruments, we are not subject to risks relating to interest rates, foreign current exchange rate fluctuations, or the other market risks contemplated
by Item 305 of Regulation S-K.



Page 32



---

|ITEM 8. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.
|------- | --------------------------------------------

Our financial
statements and supplementary data are detailed under Item 15 (a) and filed as part of the report on the pages indicated.



|ITEM 9. | CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.
|------- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

On September 22, 2006, the Financial Oversight Committee of the General Partners dismissed Ernst & Young LLP as the Partnerships independent registered public accounting firm, effective
immediately. Also, on September 22, 2006, the Financial Oversight Committee engaged Frazier & Deeter, LLC as its independent registered public accounting firm.

Ernst & Young LLPs reports on the financial statements of the Partnership for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004 did not contain an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, nor were they
qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope, or accounting principle.

During the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the subsequent
interim period through September 22, 2006, there were no disagreements with Ernst & Young LLP on any matters related to accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosures, or auditing scope or procedures, which, if not
resolved to the satisfaction of Ernst & Young LLP, would have caused Ernst & Young LLP to make reference thereto in their reports on the financial statements of the Partnership for such years. There were no reportable events as set
forth in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K.

The Partnership provided Ernst & Young LLP with a copy of the Form 8-K filed with regard to
the change in independent registered public accounting firm, which was filed with the SEC on September 27, 2006, and requested that Ernst & Young LLP furnish the Partnership with a letter addressed to the Securities and Exchange
Commission stating whether or not it agrees with the foregoing statements. A copy of Ernst & Young LLPs letter dated September 27, 2006, was filed as Exhibit 16.1 to the September 27, 2006 Form 8-K.

During the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, and through September 22, 2006, the Partnership did not consult with Frazier & Deeter, LLC with
respect to the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Partnerships financial statements, or any other matters or reportable
events as set forth in Items 304(a)(2)(i) and (ii) of Regulation S-K.

There were no disagreements with the Partnerships independent public
accountants during the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005.



|ITEM 9A. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
|-------- | ------------------------

We carried out an evaluation, under the
supervision and with the participation of management of Wells Capital, our corporate general partner, including the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure
controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as to the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded
that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report in providing a reasonable level of assurance that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in applicable SEC rules and forms, including providing a reasonable level of assurance that information required to be disclosed by us
in such reports is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Principal Executive Officer and our Principal Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.



Page 33



---

There were no significant changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended
December 31, 2006 that have materially affected, or are likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.



|ITEM 9B. | OTHER INFORMATION.
|-------- | ------------------

For the quarter ended December 31, 2006,
all items required to be disclosed under Form 8-K were reported under Form 8-K.



Page 34



---

PART III



|ITEM 10. | DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANTS GENERAL PARTNERS.
|-------- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------

Wells Capital

Wells Capital, our corporate general partner, was formed in April 1984. The executive offices of Wells Capital are located at
6200 The Corners Parkway, Norcross, Georgia 30092. Leo F. Wells, III is the sole Director and the President of Wells Capital. Wells Capital was organized under the Georgia Business Corporation Code, and is primarily in the business of
serving as general partner or as an affiliate of the general partner in affiliated public limited partnerships (Wells Real Estate Funds). Wells Capital or its affiliates serves as the advisor to the Wells Real Estate Investment Trust,
Inc., Wells Real Estate Investment Trust II, Inc., Wells Timberland REIT, Inc., and Institutional REIT, Inc. (collectively, Wells REITs), each of which are Maryland corporations. Wells Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. and Wells
Real Estate Investment Trust II, Inc. qualify as real estate investment trusts, and Wells Timberland REIT, Inc. and Institutional REIT, Inc. intend to qualify as real estate investment trusts beginning with the year ending December 31,
2007. In these capacities, Wells Capital performs certain services for the Wells Real Estate Funds and the Wells REITs, including presenting, structuring, and acquiring real estate investment opportunities; entering into leases and service contracts
on acquired properties; arranging for and completing the disposition of properties; and providing other services such as accounting and administrative functions. Wells Capital is a wholly owned subsidiary of WREF, of which Leo F. Wells, III is the
sole stockholder.

Leo F. Wells, III

Mr. Wells,
63, who serves as one of our General Partners, is the president, treasurer, and sole director of Wells Capital, which is our corporate general partner. He is also the sole stockholder, president, and sole director of WREF, the parent corporation of
Wells Capital, Wells Management, Wells Investment Securities, Inc. (WIS), and Wells & Associates, Inc., a real estate brokerage and investment company formed in 1976 and incorporated in 1978, for which Mr. Wells serves as
principal broker. He is also the president, treasurer, and sole director of:



| |  |  | Wells Management, our property manager;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------

| |  |  | Wells Asset Management, Inc.;
| | - |  | -----------------------------

| |  |  | Wells & Associates, Inc.; and
| | - |  | -----------------------------

| |  |  | Wells Development Corporation, a company he organized in 1997 to develop real properties.
| | - |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mr. Wells is a director of each of the Wells REITs, which are Maryland corporations that either currently qualify as real estate investment trusts or intend to
qualify as real estate investment trusts beginning with the year ending December 31, 2007.

Mr. Wells was a real estate salesman and property
manager from 1970 to 1973 for Roy D. Warren & Company, an Atlanta-based real estate company, and he was associated from 1973 to 1976 with Sax Gaskin Real Estate Company. From 1980 to February 1985 he served as Vice President of
Hill-Johnson, Inc., a Georgia corporation engaged in the construction business. Mr. Wells holds a Bachelor of Business Administration degree in economics from the University of Georgia. Mr. Wells is a member of the Financial Planning
Association.

On August 26, 2003, Mr. Wells and WIS entered into a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent (AWC) with the National
Association of Securities Dealers, Inc. (NASD) relating to alleged rule violations. The AWC set forth the NASDs findings that WIS and Mr. Wells had violated conduct rules relating to the provision of noncash compensation of
more than $100 to associated persons of NASD member firms in connection with their attendance at the annual educational and due diligence conferences sponsored by WIS in 2001 and 2002. Without admitting or denying the allegations and findings
against them, WIS and Mr. Wells consented in the AWC to various findings by the NASD, which are summarized in the following paragraph:

In 2001 and 2002, WIS sponsored conferences attended by registered representatives who sold its real estate investment products. WIS also paid for certain expenses of guests of the registered representatives who attended the conferences. In
2001, WIS paid the costs of travel to the conference and meals for many of the



Page 35



---

guests, and paid the costs of playing golf for some of the registered representatives and their guests. WIS later invoiced registered representatives for the
cost of golf and for travel expenses of guests, but was not fully reimbursed for such. In 2002, WIS paid for meals for the guests. WIS also conditioned most of the 2001 conference invitations on attainment by the registered representatives of a
predetermined sales goal for WIS products. This conduct violated the prohibitions against payment and receipt of noncash compensation in connection with the sales of these products contained in NASDs Conduct Rules 2710, 2810, and 3060. In
addition, WIS and Mr. Wells failed to adhere to all of the terms of their written undertaking made in March 2001 not to engage in the conduct described above, and thereby engaged in conduct that was inconsistent with high standards of
commercial honor and just and equitable principles of trade in violation of NASD Conduct Rule 2110.

WIS consented to a censure and Mr. Wells
consented to suspension from acting in a principal capacity with an NASD member firm for one year. WIS and Mr. Wells also agreed to the imposition of a joint and several fine in the amount of $150,000. Mr. Wells one-year suspension
from acting in a principal capacity ended on October 6, 2004. Mr. Wells continues to represent the issuer and perform other nonprincipal activities on behalf of WIS.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 requires the officers and directors of our general partner, and persons who own 10% or more of any class of equity interests in the Partnership, to report their beneficial ownership of equity interests in the Partnership to the SEC. Their
initial reports are required to be filed using the SECs Form 3, and they are required to report subsequent purchases, sales, and other changes using the SECs Form 4, which must be filed within two business days of most
transactions. Officers, directors, and partners owning more than 10% of any class of equity interests in the Partnership are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all of reports they file pursuant to Section 16(a).

Financial Oversight Committee

The Partnership does
not have a board of directors or an audit committee. Accordingly, as our corporate general partner, Wells Capital, has established a Financial Oversight Committee consisting of Leo F. Wells, III, as the Principal Executive Officer; Douglas P.
Williams, as the Principal Financial Officer; and Randall D. Fretz, as the Senior Vice President of our corporate general partner. The Financial Oversight Committee serves the equivalent function of an audit committee for, among others, the
following purposes: appointment, compensation, review and oversight of the work of our independent registered public accountants, and establishing and enforcing the code of ethics. However, since neither the Partnership nor its corporate general
partner has an audit committee and the Financial Oversight Committee is not independent of the Partnership or the General Partners, we do not have an audit committee financial expert.

Code of Ethics

The Partnership has adopted a code of ethics
applicable to our corporate general partners Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, as well as the principal accounting officer, controller or other employees of our corporate general partner performing similar functions
on behalf of the Partnership, if any. The code of ethics is contained in the Business Standards/Code of Conduct/General Policies established by WREF. You may obtain a copy of this code of ethics, without charge, upon request by calling our Client
Services Department at 800-557-4830 or 770-243-8282.



|ITEM 11. | COMPENSATION OF GENERAL PARTNERS AND AFFILIATES.
|-------- | ------------------------------------------------

The Partnership
has not made any payments to Leo F. Wells, III as compensation for serving as our general partner. Further, the Partnership does not have any employees, officers, or directors and, accordingly, no compensation has been awarded to, earned by, or paid
to any individuals. See Item 13, Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, for a description of the fees incurred by the Partnership payable to affiliates of the General Partners during the year ended December 31, 2006.



Page 36



---

|ITEM 12. | SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT.
|-------- | ---------------------------------------------------------------

(a) No limited partner is known by the Partnership to own beneficially more than 5% of any class of the outstanding units of the Partnership.



|(b) | Set forth below is the security ownership of management as of February 28, 2007.
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                          |  |                         |  |                                          |  |                 
|------------------------- |  | ----------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------- |  | ----------------
|Title of Class            |  | Name of BeneficialOwner |  | Amount and Nature ofBeneficial
Ownership |  | Percent of Class
|Limited Partnership Units |  | Leo F. Wells, III       |  | 2,095.945 Units(1)                       |  | Less than 1%    



| | (1) | Leo F. Wells, III owns 2,095.945 Cash Preferred Units through an Individual Retirement Account.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(c) No arrangements exist which would, upon operation, result in a change in control of the Partnership.



|ITEM 13. | CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS.
|-------- | -----------------------------------------------

The compensation
and fees we pay to our General Partners and their affiliates in connection our operations are as follows:

Interest in Partnership Cash Flow and Net
Sales Proceeds

The General Partners are entitled to receive a subordinated participation in net cash flow from operations equal to 10% of net cash flow
after the limited partners holding Cash Preferred Units have received preferential distributions equal to 10% of their adjusted capital accounts in each fiscal year. The General Partners are also entitled to receive a subordinated participation in
net sales proceeds and net financing proceeds equal to 20% of residual proceeds available for distribution after limited partners holding Cash Preferred Units have received a return of their adjusted capital contributions plus a 10% cumulative
return on their adjusted capital contributions, and limited partners holding Tax Preferred Units have received a return of their adjusted capital contributions plus a 15% cumulative return on their adjusted capital contributions; provided, however,
that in no event shall the General Partners receive in the aggregate in excess of 15% of net sales proceeds and net financing proceeds remaining after payments to limited partners from such proceeds of amounts equal to the sum of their adjusted
capital contributions plus a 6% cumulative return on their adjusted capital contributions. The General Partners did not receive any distributions of net cash from operations or net sales proceeds during the year ended December 31, 2006.

Management and Leasing Fees

We have entered into a
property management, leasing, and asset management agreement with Wells Management Company, Inc. (Wells Management), an affiliate of the General Partners. In accordance with the property management and leasing agreement, Wells Management
receives compensation for the management and leasing of the Partnerships properties, owned directly or through the Joint Ventures, equal to the lesser of (a) fees that would be paid to a comparable outside firm, that is assessed
periodically based on market studies, or (b) 4.5% of the gross revenues collected monthly; plus, a separate competitive fee for the one-time initial lease-up of newly constructed properties generally paid in conjunction with the receipt of the
first months rent. In the case of commercial properties leased on a long-term net-lease basis (ten or more years), the maximum property management fee from such leases shall be 1% of the gross revenues generally paid over the life of the
leases except for a one-time initial leasing fee of 3% of the gross revenues on each lease payable over the first five full years of the original lease term. Management and leasing fees are paid by the Joint Ventures and, accordingly, included in
equity in income (loss) of joint ventures in the accompanying statements of operations. Our share of management and leasing fees and lease acquisition costs incurred through the Joint Ventures that are payable to Wells Management and its affiliates
is $86,980, $105,529, and $184,274 for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively.



Page 37



---

Administrative Reimbursements

Wells Capital, one of the our General Partners, and Wells Management perform certain administrative services for the Partnership, relating to accounting, property management and other partnership administration, and incur the related
expenses. Such expenses are allocated among other entities affiliated with the General Partners based on time spent on each fund by individual administrative personnel. In the opinion of the General Partners, this allocation is a reasonable
estimation of such expenses. We reimbursed Wells Capital and Wells Management for administrative expenses of $69,475, $84,233, and $80,233 for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively.

Acquisition and Advisory Fees and Acquisition Expense Reimbursements

We have incurred acquisition and advisory fees and acquisition expense reimbursements payable to Wells Capital in an amount equal to 3.5% of aggregate gross offering proceeds. Upon making investments in properties, we applied deferred
project costs of $0, $0, and $118,219 to investment in the Joint Ventures during 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively.

Real Estate Commissions

In connection with the sale of our properties, the General Partners or their affiliates may receive commissions not exceeding the lesser of
(a) 50% of the commissions customarily charged by other brokers in arms-length transactions involving comparable properties in the same geographic area or (b) 3% of the gross sales price of the property, and provided that payments of
such commissions will be made only after limited partners have received prior distributions totaling 100% of their capital contributions plus a 6% cumulative return on their adjusted capital contributions. No real estate commissions were paid to the
General Partners or affiliates for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, or 2004.

Procedures Regarding Related-Party Transactions

Our policies and procedures governing related-party transactions with our General Partners and their affiliates, including, but not limited to, all
transactions required to be disclosed under Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K, are restricted or severely limited under many circumstances pursuant to the provisions of Articles XI, XII, XIII, and XIV of our partnership agreement, which has been
filed with the SEC. No transaction has been entered into with either of our General Partners or their affiliates that does not comply with those policies and procedures. In addition, in any transaction involving a potential conflict of interest,
including any transaction that would require disclosure under Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K, our General Partners must view such a transaction after taking into consideration their fiduciary duties to the Partnership.



|ITEM 14. | PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES.
|-------- | ---------------------------------------

Preapproval Policies
and Procedures

The Financial Oversight Committee preapproves all auditing and permissible nonauditing services provided by our independent registered
public accountants. The approval may be given as part of the Financial Oversight Committees approval of the scope of the engagement of our independent registered public accountants or on an individual basis. The preapproval of certain
audit-related services and certain nonauditing services not exceeding enumerated dollar limits may be delegated to one or more of the Financial Oversight Committees members, but the member to whom such authority is delegated shall report any
preapproval decisions to the full Financial Oversight Committee. Our independent registered public accountants may not be retained to perform the nonauditing services specified in Section 10A(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.



Page 38



---

Fees Paid to the Independent Registered Public Accountants

On September 22, 2006, the Financial Oversight Committee of the General Partners dismissed Ernst & Young LLP as the Partnerships independent
registered public accounting firm, which had served as the Partnerships independent registered public accountants since July 3, 2002, and appointed Frazier & Deeter, LLC to serve in that capacity for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2006. All such fees are recognized in the period to which the services relate. A portion of such fees are allocated to the joint ventures in which the Partnership invests. The aggregate fees billed to the Partnership for
professional accounting services by Frazier & Deeter, LLC and Ernst & Young LLP, including the audit of the Partnerships annual financial statements, for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, are set forth
in the table below.



|                   |  |                       |        |                   |   |        |  |   |       
|------------------ |  | --------------------- | ------ | ----------------- | - | ------ |  | - | ------
|                   |  | Frazier & Deeter, LLC |        | Ernst & Young LLP
|                   |  | 2006                  |        | 2006              |   | 2005  
|Audit Fees         |  | $                     | 24,959 |                   | $ | 9,936  |  | $ | 38,146
|Audit-Related Fees |  |                       | 0      |                   |   | 0      |  |   | 0     
|Tax Fees           |  |                       | 0      |                   |   | 16,638 |  |   | 16,806
|Other Fees         |  |                       | 0      |                   |   | 0      |  |   | 0     
|                   |  |                       |        |                   |   |        |  |   |       
|Total              |  | $                     | 24,959 |                   | $ | 26,574 |  | $ | 54,952
|                   |  |                       |        |                   |   |        |  |   |       

For purposes of the preceding table, the professional fees are classified as follows:



| |  |  | Audit Fees  These are fees for professional services performed for the audit of our annual financial statements and review of financial statements included in
our Form 10-Q filings, services that are normally provided by independent registered public accountants in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements, and services that generally independent registered public accountants
reasonably can provide, such as statutory audits, attest services, consents, and assistance with and review of documents filed with the SEC.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Audit-Related Fees  These are fees for assurance and related services that traditionally are performed by independent registered public accountants, such as
due diligence related to acquisitions and dispositions, internal control reviews, attestation services that are not required by statute or regulation, and consultation concerning financial accounting and reporting standards.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Tax Fees  These are fees for all professional services performed by professional staff in our independent registered public accountants tax division,
except those services related to the audit of our financial statements. These include fees for tax compliance, tax planning, and tax advice. Tax compliance involves preparation of any federal, state or local tax returns. Tax planning and tax advice
encompass a diverse range of services, including assistance with tax audits and appeals, tax advice related to acquisitions and dispositions of assets, and requests for rulings or technical advice from taxing authorities.
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Other Fees  These are fees for other permissible work performed that do not meet the above-described categories, including assistance with internal audit
plans and risk assessments.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

During the fiscal years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, 100% of the services performed by
Frazier & Deeter, LLC and Ernst & Young LLP described above under the captions Audit Fees, Audit-Related Fees, Tax Fees, and Other Fees were approved in advance by a member of the
Financial Oversight Committee.



Page 39



---

PART IV



|ITEM 15. | EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.
|-------- | -------------------------------------------



|(a) | 1.  The financial statements are contained on pages F-2 through F-49 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and the list of the financial statements contained herein is
set forth on page F-1, which is hereby incorporated by reference.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(b) | The Exhibits filed in response to Item 601 of Regulation S-K are listed on the Exhibit Index attached hereto.
|--- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(c) | See (a) 1 above.
|--- | ----------------



Page 40



---

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.



|               |  |                                                                                                    |  |                                                 |  | 
|-------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------------- |  | 
|               |  | WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND XIII, L.P. (Registrant)                                                    
|               |  |                                                                                                   
|               |  | By:                                                                                                |  | WELLS CAPITAL, INC. (Corporate General Partner)
|               | 
|March 27, 2007 |  | /S/    LEO F. WELLS,
III                                                                          
|               |  | Leo F. Wells, III President,
Principal Executive Officer, and Sole Director of Wells Capital, Inc.
|               | 
|March 27, 2007 |  | /S/    DOUGLAS P.
WILLIAMS                                                                        
|               |  | Douglas P. Williams Principal
Financial Officer of Wells Capital, Inc.                            



Page 41



---

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND XIII, L.P.

TABLE OF CONTENTS



|                                                                                      |  |     
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ----
|FINANCIAL STATEMENTS                                                                  |  | Page
|                                                                                      | 
|WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND XIII, L.P.                                                     |  |     
|Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm  Frazier & Deeter, LLC       |  | F-2 
|Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm  Ernst & Young LLP           |  | F-3 
|Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2006 and 2005                                       |  | F-4 
|Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004        |  | F-5 
|Statements of Partners Capital for the Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004 |  | F-6 
|Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004        |  | F-7 
|Notes to Financial Statements                                                         |  | F-8 
|                                                                                      | 
|WELLS FUND XIII-REIT JOINT VENTURE PARTNERSHIP                                        |  |     
|Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm  Frazier & Deeter, LLC       |  | F-20
|Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm  Ernst & Young LLP           |  | F-21
|Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2006 and 2005                                       |  | F-22
|Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004        |  | F-23
|Statements of Partners Capital for the Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004 |  | F-24
|Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004        |  | F-25
|Notes to Financial Statements                                                         |  | F-26
|Schedule III  Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization              |  | F-33
|                                                                                      | 
|FUND XIII AND FUND XIV ASSOCIATES                                                     |  |     
|Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm  Frazier & Deeter, LLC       |  | F-35
|Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm  Ernst & Young LLP           |  | F-36
|Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2006 and 2005                                       |  | F-37
|Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2006, 2005, 2004              |  | F-38
|Statement of Partners Capital for the year ended December 31, 2006, 2005, 2004       |  | F-39
|Statement of Cash Flows for the year ended December 31, 2006, 2005, 2004              |  | F-40
|Notes to Financial Statements                                                         |  | F-41
|Schedule III  Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization              |  | F-48



Page F-1



---

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The General Partners of

Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P.

We
have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P. (the Partnership) as of December 31, 2006, and the related statements of operations, partners capital, and cash flows for the year ended
December 31, 2006. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnerships management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Partnerships internal control over financial reporting. Our audit
included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Partnerships
internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P. as of December 31, 2006, and the results of its
operations and its cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2006, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

/S/     FRAZIER & DEETER, LLC

Atlanta, Georgia

March 26, 2007



Page F-2



---

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The General Partners of

Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P.

We
have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P. (the Partnership) as of December 31, 2005, and the related statements of operations, partners capital, and cash flows for each of the two years
in the period ended December 31, 2005. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Partnerships management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Partnerships internal control over financial reporting. Our audits
included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Partnerships
internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles
used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P. at December 31, 2005, and the results of its
operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2005, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

/S/     ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Atlanta, Georgia

March 23, 2007



Page F-3



---

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND XIII, L.P.

BALANCE SHEETS

DECEMBER 31, 2006 AND 2005

ASSETS



|                             |  |      |            |      |   |           
|---------------------------- |  | ---- | ---------- | ---- | - | ----------
|                             |  | 2006 |            | 2005
|Investment in joint ventures |  | $    | 20,355,332 |      | $ | 21,442,460
|Cash and cash equivalents    |  |      | 83,793     |      |   | 156,651   
|Due from joint ventures      |  |      | 522,385    |      |   | 382,851   
|Other assets                 |  |      | 192        |      |   | 0         
|                             |  |      |            |      |   |           
|Total assets                 |  | $    | 20,961,702 |      | $ | 21,981,962
|                             |  |      |            |      |   |           

LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS CAPITAL



|                                                                                                                     |  |   |            |  |   |           
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | - | ---------- |  | - | ----------
|Liabilities:                                                                                                         |  |   |            |  |   |           
|Accounts payable and accrued expenses                                                                                |  | $ | 44,764     |  | $ | 48,587    
|Due to affiliates                                                                                                    |  |   | 6,166      |  |   | 7,929     
|Partnership distribution payable                                                                                     |  |   | 464,806    |  |   | 473,594   
|                                                                                                                     |  |   |            |  |   |           
|Total liabilities                                                                                                    |  |   | 515,736    |  |   | 530,110   
|                                                                                                                     |  |  
|Commitment and contingencies                                                                                         |  |   |           |  |   |          
|                                                                                                                     |  |  
|Partners capital:                                                                                                   |  |   |            |  |   |           
|Limited partners:                                                                                                    |  |   |            |  |   |           
|Cash Preferred  3,220,631 and 3,197,914 units issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively |  |   | 20,445,966 |  |   | 20,539,789
|Tax Preferred  551,417 and 574,134 units issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively      |  |   | 0          |  |   | 912,063   
|General partners                                                                                                     |  |   | 0          |  |   | 0         
|                                                                                                                     |  |   |            |  |   |           
|Total partners capital                                                                                              |  |   | 20,445,966 |  |   | 21,451,852
|                                                                                                                     |  |   |            |  |   |           
|Total liabilities and partners capital                                                                              |  | $ | 20,961,702 |  | $ | 21,981,962
|                                                                                                                     |  |   |            |  |   |           

See accompanying notes.



Page F-4



---

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND XIII, L.P.

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED

DECEMBER 31, 2006, 2005, AND 2004



|                                                             |  |      |           |   |      |   |           |  |   |            |  
|------------------------------------------------------------ |  | ---- | --------- | - | ---- | - | --------- |  | - | ---------- | -
|                                                             |  | 2006 |           |   | 2005 |   | 2004      | 
|                                                             |  |      |          
|EQUITY IN INCOME OF JOINT VENTURES                           |  | $    | 925,459   |   |      | $ | 3,023,505 |  | $ | 1,106,316  |  
|                                                             |  |      |          
|EXPENSES:                                                    |  |      |           |   |      |   |           |  |   |            |  
|General and administrative                                   |  |      | 139,292   |   |      |   | 163,954   |  |   | 164,408    |  
|                                                             |  |      |          
|INTEREST AND OTHER INCOME                                    |  |      | 3,381     |   |      |   | 168,511   |  |   | 12,465     |  
|                                                             |  |      |           |   |      |   |           |  |   |            |  
|NET INCOME                                                   |  | $    | 789,548   |   |      | $ | 3,028,062 |  | $ | 954,373    |  
|                                                             |  |      |           |   |      |   |           |  |   |            |  
|NET INCOME (LOSS) ALLOCATED TO LIMITED PARTNERS:             |  |      |           |   |      |   |           |  |   |            |  
|CASH PREFERRED                                               |  | $    | 1,756,977 |   |      | $ | 2,295,882 |  | $ | 2,583,944  |  
|                                                             |  |      |           |   |      |   |           |  |   |            |  
|TAX PREFERRED                                                |  | $    | (967,429  | ) |      | $ | 732,180   |  | $ | (1,629,571 | )
|                                                             |  |      |           |   |      |   |           |  |   |            |  
|                                                             |  |      |          
|NET INCOME (LOSS) PER WEIGHTED-AVERAGE LIMITED PARTNER UNIT: |  |      |           |   |      |   |           |  |   |            |  
|CASH PREFERRED                                               |  |      | $ 0.55    |   |      |   | $0.73     |  |   | $ 0.83     |  
|                                                             |  |      |           |   |      |   |           |  |   |            |  
|TAX PREFERRED                                                |  |      | $(1.75    | ) |      |   | $1.18     |  |   | $(2.42     | )
|                                                             |  |      |           |   |      |   |           |  |   |            |  
|                                                             |  |      |          
|WEIGHTED-AVERAGE LIMITED PARTNER UNITS OUTSTANDING:          |  |      |           |   |      |   |           |  |   |            |  
|CASH PREFERRED                                               |  |      | 3,218,268 |   |      |   | 3,149,523 |  |   | 3,099,580  |  
|                                                             |  |      |           |   |      |   |           |  |   |            |  
|TAX PREFERRED                                                |  |      | 553,780   |   |      |   | 622,525   |  |   | 672,468    |  
|                                                             |  |      |           |   |      |   |           |  |   |            |  

See accompanying notes.



Page F-5



---

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND XIII, L.P.

STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS CAPITAL

FOR THE YEARS ENDED

DECEMBER 31, 2006, 2005, AND 2004



|                                                                                                                                  |          |                  |                |  |                 |               |                        |       |            |   |        |         |   |  |   |            |   |  |   |   |  |   |             |  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- | -------- | ---------------- | -------------- |  | --------------- | ------------- | ---------------------- | ----- | ---------- | - | ------ | ------- | - |  | - | ---------- | - |  | - | - |  | - | ----------- | -
|                                                                                                                                  |          | Limited Partners |                |  | GeneralPartners |               | Total PartnersCapital |      
|                                                                                                                                  | Original |                  | Cash Preferred |  |                 | Tax Preferred |                        |       |           
|                                                                                                                                  |          | Units            |                |  | Amount          |               |                        | Units |            |   | Amount |         |   | 
|BALANCE, December 31, 2003                                                                                                        |          | $                | 0              |  | 3,083,828       |               |                        | $     | 26,958,308 |   |        | 688,220 |   |  | $ | 5,030,438  |   |  | $ | 0 |  | $ | 31,988,746  |  
|                                                                                                                                  |          |                  |                |  |                 |               |                       
|Cash Preferred conversion elections                                                                                               |          |                  | 0              |  | (10,000         | )             |                        |       | (87,594    | ) |        | 10,000  |   |  |   | 87,594     |   |  |   | 0 |  |   | 0           |  
|Tax Preferred conversion elections                                                                                                |          |                  | 0              |  | 57,872          |               |                        |       | 339,128    |   |        | (57,872 | ) |  |   | (339,128   | ) |  |   | 0 |  |   | 0           |  
|Net income (loss)                                                                                                                 |          |                  | 0              |  | 0               |               |                        |       | 2,583,944  |   |        | 0       |   |  |   | (1,629,571 | ) |  |   | 0 |  |   | 954,373     |  
|Distributions of operating cash flow($0.81 per weighted-average Cash Preferred Unit)                                              |          |                  | 0              |  | 0               |               |                        |       | (2,518,810 | ) |        | 0       |   |  |   | 0          |   |  |   | 0 |  |   | (2,518,810  | )
|                                                                                                                                  |          |                  |                |  |                 |               |                        |       |            |   |        |         |   |  |   |            |   |  |   |   |  |   |             |  
|BALANCE, December 31, 2004                                                                                                        |          |                  | 0              |  | 3,131,700       |               |                        |       | 27,274,976 |   |        | 640,348 |   |  |   | 3,149,333  |   |  |   | 0 |  |   | 30,424,309  |  
|                                                                                                                                  |          |                  |                |  |                 |               |                       
|Cash Preferred conversion elections                                                                                               |          |                  | 0              |  | (10,000         | )             |                        |       | (87,093    | ) |        | 10,000  |   |  |   | 87,093     |   |  |   | 0 |  |   | 0           |  
|Tax Preferred conversion elections                                                                                                |          |                  | 0              |  | 76,214          |               |                        |       | 470,413    |   |        | (76,214 | ) |  |   | (470,413   | ) |  |   | 0 |  |   | 0           |  
|Net income                                                                                                                        |          |                  | 0              |  | 0               |               |                        |       | 2,295,882  |   |        | 0       |   |  |   | 732,180    |   |  |   | 0 |  |   | 3,028,062   |  
|Distributions of operating cash flow($0.64 per weighted-average Cash Preferred Unit)                                              |          |                  | 0              |  | 0               |               |                        |       | (2,000,519 | ) |        | 0       |   |  |   | 0          |   |  |   | 0 |  |   | (2,000,519  | )
|Distributions of net sale proceeds($2.35 and $4.15 per weighted-average Cash Preferred Unit and Tax Preferred Unit,
respectively) |          |                  | 0              |  | 0               |               |                        |       | (7,413,870 | ) |        | 0       |   |  |   | (2,586,130 | ) |  |   | 0 |  |   | (10,000,000 | )
|                                                                                                                                  |          |                  |                |  |                 |               |                        |       |            |   |        |         |   |  |   |            |   |  |   |   |  |   |             |  
|BALANCE, December 31, 2005                                                                                                        |          |                  | 0              |  | 3,197,914       |               |                        |       | 20,539,789 |   |        | 574,134 |   |  |   | 912,063    |   |  |   | 0 |  |   | 21,451,852  |  
|                                                                                                                                  |          |                  |                |  |                 |               |                       
|Cash Preferred conversion elections                                                                                               |          |                  | 0              |  | (15,581         | )             |                        |       | (100,120   | ) |        | 15,581  |   |  |   | 100,120    |   |  |   | 0 |  |   | 0           |  
|Tax Preferred conversion elections                                                                                                |          |                  | 0              |  | 38,298          |               |                        |       | 44,754     |   |        | (38,298 | ) |  |   | (44,754    | ) |  |   | 0 |  |   | 0           |  
|Net income                                                                                                                        |          |                  | 0              |  | 0               |               |                        |       | 1,756,977  |   |        | 0       |   |  |   | (967,429   | ) |  |   | 0 |  |   | 789,548     |  
|Distributions of operating cash flow ($0.56 per weighted-average Cash Preferred Unit)                                             |          |                  | 0              |  | 0               |               |                        |       | (1,795,434 | ) |        | 0       |   |  |   | 0          |   |  |   | 0 |  |   | (1,795,434  | )
|                                                                                                                                  |          |                  |                |  |                 |               |                        |       |            |   |        |         |   |  |   |            |   |  |   |   |  |   |             |  
|                                                                                                                                  |          |                  |                |  |                 |               |                       
|BALANCE, December 31, 2006                                                                                                        |          | $                | 0              |  | 3,220,631       |               |                        | $     | 20,445,966 |   |        | 551,417 |   |  | $ | 0          |   |  | $ | 0 |  | $ | 20,445,966  |  
|                                                                                                                                  |          |                  |                |  |                 |               |                        |       |            |   |        |         |   |  |   |            |   |  |   |   |  |   |             |  

See accompanying notes.



Page F-6



---

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND XIII, L.P.

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED

DECEMBER 31, 2006, 2005, AND 2004



|                                                                                   |  |      |            |   |      |   |             |      |  |   |            |  
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ---------- | - | ---- | - | ----------- | ---- |  | - | ---------- | -
|                                                                                   |  | 2006 |            |   | 2005 |   |             | 2004 | 
|CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:                                              |  |      |            |   |      |   |             |      |  |   |            |  
|Net income                                                                         |  | $    | 789,548    |   |      | $ | 3,028,062   |      |  | $ | 954,373    |  
|Operating distributions received from joint ventures                               |  |      | 1,885,550  |   |      |   | 2,245,596   |      |  |   | 2,678,086  |  
|Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:  |  |      |            |   |      |   |             |      |  |   |            |  
|Equity in income of joint ventures                                                 |  |      | (925,459   | ) |      |   | (3,023,505  | )    |  |   | (1,106,316 | )
|Operating changes in assets and liabilities:                                       |  |      |            |   |      |   |             |      |  |   |            |  
|Increase in other assets                                                           |  |      | (192       | ) |      |   | 0           |      |  |   | 0          |  
|Decrease (increase) in due from affiliate                                          |  |      | 0          |   |      |   | 478         |      |  |   | (478       | )
|(Decrease) increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses                       |  |      | (3,823     | ) |      |   | 12,191      |      |  |   | 13,000     |  
|(Decrease) increase in due to affiliates                                           |  |      | (1,763     | ) |      |   | 4,558       |      |  |   | (19        | )
|                                                                                   |  |      |            |   |      |   |             |      |  |   |            |  
|Net cash provided by operating activities                                          |  |      | 1,743,861  |   |      |   | 2,267,380   |      |  |   | 2,538,646  |  
|                                                                                   |  |      |           
|CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:                                              |  |      |            |   |      |   |             |      |  |   |            |  
|Investments in joint ventures                                                      |  |      | (12,497    | ) |      |   | (114,404    | )    |  |   | (2,836,445 | )
|Net sale proceeds received from joint ventures                                     |  |      | 0          |   |      |   | 10,043,535  |      |  |   | 0          |  
|                                                                                   |  |      |            |   |      |   |             |      |  |   |            |  
|Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities                                |  |      | (12,497    | ) |      |   | 9,929,131   |      |  |   | (2,836,445 | )
|                                                                                   |  |      |           
|CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:                                              |  |      |            |   |      |   |             |      |  |   |            |  
|Net sale proceeds distributions paid to limited partners                           |  |      | 0          |   |      |   | (10,000,000 | )    |  |   | 0          |  
|Operating distributions paid to limited partners from accumulated operating income |  |      | (1,804,222 | ) |      |   | (2,192,411  | )    |  |   | (2,354,446 | )
|                                                                                   |  |      |            |   |      |   |             |      |  |   |            |  
|Net cash used in financing activities                                              |  |      | (1,804,222 | ) |      |   | (12,192,411 | )    |  |   | (2,354,446 | )
|                                                                                   |  |      |           
|NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS                               |  |      | (72,858    | ) |      |   | 4,100       |      |  |   | (2,652,245 | )
|                                                                                   |  |      |           
|CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of year                                       |  |      | 156,651    |   |      |   | 152,551     |      |  |   | 2,804,796  |  
|                                                                                   |  |      |            |   |      |   |             |      |  |   |            |  
|CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of year                                             |  | $    | 83,793     |   |      | $ | 156,651     |      |  | $ | 152,551    |  
|                                                                                   |  |      |            |   |      |   |             |      |  |   |            |  
|                                                                                   |  |      |           
|SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:             |  |      |            |   |      |   |             |      |  |   |            |  
|Partnership distributions payable                                                  |  | $    | 464,806    |   |      | $ | 473,594     |      |  | $ | 665,486    |  
|                                                                                   |  |      |            |   |      |   |             |      |  |   |            |  
|Deferred project costs applied to joint ventures                                   |  | $    | 0          |   |      | $ | 0           |      |  | $ | 118,219    |  
|                                                                                   |  |      |            |   |      |   |             |      |  |   |            |  

See accompanying notes.



Page F-7



---

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND XIII, L.P.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2006, 2005, AND 2004



|1. | ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS
|-- | -------------------------

Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P. (the
Partnership) is a Georgia public limited partnership with Leo F. Wells, III and Wells Capital, Inc. (Wells Capital), a Georgia corporation, serving as its general partners (collectively, the General Partners).
Wells Capital is a wholly owned subsidiary of Wells Real Estate Funds, Inc. Leo F. Wells, III is the president and sole director of Wells Capital and the president, sole director, and sole owner of Wells Real Estate Funds, Inc. The
Partnership was formed on September 15, 1998 for the purpose of acquiring, developing, owning, operating, improving, leasing, and managing income-producing commercial properties for investment purposes. Upon subscription for units, the Limited
Partners must elect whether to have their units treated as Cash Preferred Units or Tax Preferred Units. Thereafter, Limited Partners have the right to change their prior elections to have some or all of their units treated as Cash Preferred Units or
Tax Preferred Units one time during each quarterly accounting period. Limited Partners may vote to, among other things: (a) amend the Partnership agreement, subject to certain limitations; (b) change the business purpose or investment
objectives of the Partnership, (c) add or remove a general partner; (d) elect a new general partner; (e) dissolve the Partnership; and (f) approve a sale involving all or substantially all of the Partnerships assets,
subject to certain limitations. The majority vote on any of the described matters will bind the Partnership, without the concurrence of the General Partners. Each limited partnership unit has equal voting rights, regardless of which class of unit is
selected.

On March 29, 2001, the Partnership commenced an offering of up to $45,000,000 of Cash Preferred or Tax Preferred limited partnership units
($10.00 per unit) pursuant to a Registration Statement filed on Form S-11 under the Securities Act of 1933. The Partnership commenced active operations upon receiving and accepting subscriptions for 125,000 units on June 14, 2001. The offering
was terminated on March 28, 2003, at which time the Partnership had sold approximately 3,023,371 Cash Preferred Units and 748,678 Tax Preferred Units representing capital contributions of $37,720,487.



Page F-8



---

During the periods presented, the Partnership owned interests in the following joint ventures (the Joint
Ventures) and properties:



|                                                                             |  |                                                                              |  |                                                                                                                                                
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|Joint Venture                                                                |  | Joint Venture Partners                                                       |  | Properties                                                                                                                                     
|Wells Fund XIII-REIT Joint Venture Partnership (Fund XIII-REIT Associates) |  |   Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P.   Wells Operating Partnership, L.P.(1) |  | 1. AmeriCredit Building(2) A two-story office building located in
Orange Park, Florida                                                         
|                                                                             |  |                                                                              |  | 2. 8560 Upland Drive (formerly known as the ADIC Buildings) Two connected one-story office and assembly buildings located in Parker, Colorado
|                                                                             |  |                                                                              |  | 3. John Wiley Building(2) A four-story office building located in
Fishers, Indiana                                                             
|                                                                             |  |                                                                              |  | 4. AIU  Chicago Building A four-story office building located in Hoffman Estates, Illinois                                                    
|Fund XIII and Fund XIV Associates (Fund XIII-XIV Associates)               |  |   Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P.   Wells Real Estate Fund XIV, L.P.     |  | 5. Siemens  Orlando Building Two single-story office buildings located in Orlando, Florida                                                    
|                                                                             |  |                                                                              |  | 6. Randstad  Atlanta Building A four-story office building located in Atlanta, Georgia                                                        
|                                                                             |  |                                                                              |  | 7. 7500 Setzler Parkway(3) A one-story office and warehouse
building located in Brooklyn Park, Minnesota                                       



| | (1) | Wells Operating Partnership, L.P. is a Delaware limited partnership with Wells Real Estate
Investment Trust, Inc. (Wells REIT) serving as its general partner; Wells REIT is a Maryland corporation that qualifies as a real estate investment trust.
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | These properties were sold in April 2005.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------



| | (3) | This property was sold in January 2007.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------

Wells Real Estate Fund XIV, L.P. is affiliated with the Partnership through common general partners. Each of the properties described above was acquired on an all-cash
basis.



|2. | SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|-- | ------------------------------------------

Basis of
Presentation

The Partnerships financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP).

Use of Estimates

The preparation
of the Partnerships financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses and related disclosures of contingent assets and
liabilities in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.



Page F-9



---

Investment in Joint Ventures

The Partnership has evaluated the Joint Ventures and concluded that none are variable-interest entities under the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation (FIN) No. 46(R), Consolidation of
Variable Interest Entities, which supersedes FIN No. 46 and is an interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin (ARB) No. 51, Consolidated Financial Statements. The Partnership does not have control over the
operations of the Joint Ventures; however, it does exercise significant influence. Approval by the Partnership as well as the other joint venture partners is required for any major decision or any action that would materially affect the Joint
Ventures, or their real property investments. Accordingly, upon applying the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 94, Consolidation of All Majority-Owned Subsidiaries, ARB No. 51, and
Statement of Position No. 78-9, Accounting for Investments In Real Estate Ventures, the Partnership accounts for its investments in the Joint Ventures using the equity method of accounting, whereby original investments are recorded at
cost and subsequently adjusted for contributions, distributions, and net income (loss) attributable to the Partnership. Pursuant to the terms of the joint venture agreements, all income (loss) and distributions are allocated to joint venture
partners in accordance with their respective ownership interests. Distributions of net cash from operations, if available, are generally distributed to the joint venture partners on a quarterly basis.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Partnership considers all highly
liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents include cash and short-term investments. Short-term investments are stated at cost, which approximates fair value, and consist of
investments in money market accounts.

Deferred Project Costs

The Partnership paid certain fees to Wells Capital related to the acquisition of properties. Upon investment, these fees were applied to the Joint Ventures and depreciated on the same basis and over the respective useful lives of the
corresponding real estate assets in which the Joint Ventures invested. The remaining deferred project costs were applied to Fund XIII-XIV Associates upon investing the Partnerships remaining investor proceeds in 7500 Setzler Parkway in 2004.

Distribution of Net Cash from Operations

Net cash from operations, if available, is generally distributed quarterly to the limited partners as follows:



| |  |  | First, to all Cash Preferred limited partners until such limited partners have received distributions equal to a 10% per annum return on their respective net
capital contributions, as defined.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Second, to the General Partners until the General Partners have received distributions equal to 10% of the total cumulative distributions paid by the Partnership.
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Third, to the Cash Preferred limited partners and the General Partners allocated on a basis of 90% and 10%, respectively.
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

No distributions of net cash from operations will be made to limited partners holding Tax Preferred Units.

Distribution of Sale Proceeds

Upon the sale of properties, unless reserved, net
sale proceeds will be distributed in the following order:



| |  |  | In the event that the particular property sold sells for a price that is less than its original property purchase price, to the limited partners holding Cash
Preferred Units until they have received an amount equal to the excess of the original property purchase price over the price for which the property was sold, limited to the amount of depreciation, amortization, and cost recovery deductions taken by
the limited partners holding Tax Preferred Units with respect to such property;
| | - |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Page F-10



---

| |  |  | To limited partners holding units which at any time have been treated as Tax Preferred Units until the limited partners have received an amount necessary to equal
the net cash from operations previously received by the limited partners holding Cash Preferred Units on a per-unit basis;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | To all limited partners on a per-unit basis until the limited partners have received 100% of their respective net capital contributions, as defined;
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | To all limited partners on a per-unit basis until the limited partners have received a cumulative 10% per annum return on their respective net capital
contributions, as defined;
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | To limited partners on a per-unit basis until the limited partners have received an amount equal to their respective preferential limited partner returns (defined
as the sum of a 10% per annum cumulative return on net capital contributions for all periods during which the units were treated as Cash Preferred Units and a 15% per annum cumulative return on net capital contributions for all periods
during which the units were treated as Tax Preferred Units);
| | - |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | To the General Partners until they have received 100% of their respective capital contributions, as defined;
| | - |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Then, if limited partners have received any excess limited partner distributions (defined as distributions to limited partners over the life of their investment in
the Partnership in excess of their net capital contributions, as defined, plus their preferential limited partner return), to the General Partners until they have received distributions equal to 20% of the sum of any such excess limited partner
distributions plus distributions made to the General Partners pursuant to this provision; and
| | - |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| |  |  | Thereafter, 80% to the limited partners on a per-unit basis and 20% to the General Partners.
| | - |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Allocations of Net Income, Net Loss, and Gain on Sale

For the
purpose of determining allocations per the partnership agreement, net income is defined as net income recognized by the Partnership, excluding deductions for depreciation, amortization, cost recovery, and the gain on sale of assets. Net income, as
defined, of the Partnership is generally allocated each year in the same proportion that net cash from operations is distributed to the partners holding Cash Preferred Units and to the General Partner. To the extent the Partnerships net income
in any year exceeds net cash from operations, it will be allocated 99% to the limited partners holding Cash Preferred Units and 1% to the General Partners.

Net loss, depreciation, and amortization deductions for each fiscal year will be allocated as follows: (a) 99% to the limited partners holding Tax Preferred Units and 1% to the General Partners until their capital accounts are reduced
to zero; (b) then, to any partner having a positive balance in his capital account in an amount not to exceed such positive balance; and (c) thereafter, to the General Partners.

Gain on the sale or exchange of the Partnerships properties will be allocated generally in the same manner that the net proceeds from such sale are distributed to
partners after the following allocations are made, if applicable: (a) allocations made pursuant to the qualified income offset provisions of the partnership agreement; (b) allocations to partners having negative capital accounts until all
negative capital accounts have been restored to zero; and (c) allocations to limited partners holding Tax Preferred Units in amounts equal to the deductions for depreciation and amortization previously allocated to them with respect to the
specific partnership property sold, but not in excess of the amount of gain on sale recognized by the Partnership with respect to the sale of such property.

Income Taxes

The Partnership is not subject to federal or state income taxes; therefore, none have been provided for in the accompanying
financial statements. The partners are required to include their respective shares of profits and losses in their individual income tax returns.



Page F-11



---

Reclassifications

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform with the current year financial statement presentation.

Recent Accounting
Pronouncements

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements,
which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures required for fair value measurements under GAAP, including amending SFAS No. 144. SFAS No. 157 emphasizes that fair value is a market-based
measurement, as opposed to an entity-specific measurement. SFAS No. 157 will be effective for the Partnership beginning January 1, 2008. The Partnership is currently assessing provisions and evaluating the financial impact of SFAS
No. 157 on its financial statements, however, does not believe the adoption of this pronouncement will have a material impact on its financial statements.

In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 108, Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial
Statements, which provides interpretive guidance on the consideration of the effects of prior year misstatements in quantifying current year misstatements for the purpose of a materiality assessment. SAB No. 108 is effective for fiscal
years ending after November 15, 2006, and is effective for the Partnership for the year ended December 31, 2006. The adoption of this pronouncement has not had a material impact on the Partnerships financial statements.

In July 2006, the FASB issued FIN No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, which clarifies
the relevant criteria and approach for the recognition, derecognition, and measurement of uncertain tax positions. FIN No. 48 will be effective for the Partnership beginning January 1, 2007. The Partnership is currently assessing
provisions and evaluating the financial impact of FIN No. 48 on its financial statements, however, does not believe the adoption of this pronouncement will have a material impact on its financial statements.

In June 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections, which replaces Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 20,
Accounting Changes, and SFAS No. 3, Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements. SFAS No. 154 changes the method to account for and report changes in accounting principles and corrections of errors.
Previously, most voluntary changes in accounting principles required recognition as a cumulative effect adjustment to net income during the period in which the change was adopted. Conversely, in circumstances where applicable accounting guidance
does not include specific transition provisions, SFAS No. 154 requires retrospective application to prior periods financial statements unless it is impractical to determine either the period-specific effects or the cumulative effect of
the change. SFAS No. 154 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005; however, it does not change the transition provisions of any of the existing accounting pronouncements. The adoption of this pronouncement has not
had a material impact on the Partnerships financial statements.



|4. | INVESTMENT IN JOINT VENTURES
|-- | ----------------------------

Due from Joint Ventures

As of December 31, 2006 and 2005, due from Joint Ventures represents the Partnerships share of operating cash flow to be distributed for the
fourth quarters of 2006 and 2005, respectively, from the following Joint Ventures:



|                          |  |      |         |      |   |        
|------------------------- |  | ---- | ------- | ---- | - | -------
|                          |  | 2006 |         | 2005
|Fund XIII-REIT Associates |  | $    | 260,210 |      | $ | 144,832
|Fund XIII-XIV Associates  |  |      | 262,175 |      |   | 238,019
|                          |  |      |         |      |   |        
|                          |  | $    | 522,385 |      | $ | 382,851
|                          |  |      |         |      |   |        



Page F-12



---

Summary of Investments

The Partnerships investments and approximate ownership percentages in the Joint Ventures as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 are summarized below:



|                          |  |        |            |            |     |        |   |            |  |    
|------------------------- |  | ------ | ---------- | ---------- | --- | ------ | - | ---------- |  | ---
|                          |  | 2006   |            | 2005      
|                          |  | Amount |            | Percentage |     | Amount |   | Percentage
|Fund XIII-REIT Associates |  | $      | 9,617,225  |            | 28% |        | $ | 10,125,969 |  | 28%
|Fund XIII-XIV Associates  |  |        | 10,738,107 |            | 47% |        |   | 11,316,491 |  | 47%
|                          |  |        |            |            |     |        |   |            |  |    
|                          |  | $      | 20,355,332 |            |     |        | $ | 21,442,460 |  |    
|                          |  |        |            |            |     |        |   |            |  |    

Summary of Activity

Roll-forwards of the Partnerships investment in the Joint Ventures for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 are presented below:



|                                                |  |      |            |   |      |   |             |  
|----------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ---------- | - | ---- | - | ----------- | -
|                                                |  | 2006 |            |   | 2005 |  
|Investment in Joint Ventures, beginning of year |  | $    | 21,442,460 |   |      | $ | 30,469,946  |  
|Equity in income of Joint Ventures              |  |      | 925,459    |   |      |   | 3,023,505   |  
|Contributions to Joint Ventures                 |  |      | 12,497     |   |      |   | 114,404     |  
|Distributions from Joint Ventures               |  |      | (2,025,084 | ) |      |   | (12,165,395 | )
|                                                |  |      |            |   |      |   |             |  
|Investment in Joint Ventures, end of year       |  | $    | 20,355,332 |   |      | $ | 21,442,460  |  
|                                                |  |      |            |   |      |   |             |  

Summary of Financial Information

Condensed financial information for the Joint Ventures as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 and for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004, is presented below:



|                          |  |                           |            |                               |   |                           |  |      |           |      |   |           |  |   |            |  |   |           
|------------------------- |  | ------------------------- | ---------- | ----------------------------- | - | ------------------------- |  | ---- | --------- | ---- | - | --------- |  | - | ---------- |  | - | ----------
|                          |  | Total Assets December 31, |            | Total LiabilitiesDecember 31, |   | Total Equity December 31,
|                          |  | 2006                      |            | 2005                          |   | 2006                      |  | 2005 |           | 2006 |   | 2005     
|Fund XIII-REIT Associates |  | $                         | 36,701,317 |                               | $ | 38,419,798                |  | $    | 2,488,493 |      | $ | 2,397,141 |  | $ | 34,212,824 |  | $ | 36,022,657
|Fund XIII-XIV Associates  |  |                           | 23,959,951 |                               |   | 25,215,954                |  |      | 1,257,821 |      |   | 1,291,025 |  |   | 22,702,130 |  |   | 23,924,929
|                          |  |                           |            |                               |   |                           |  |      |           |      |   |           |  |   |            |  |   |           
|                          |  | $                         | 60,661,268 |                               | $ | 63,635,752                |  | $    | 3,746,314 |      | $ | 3,688,166 |  | $ | 56,914,954 |  | $ | 59,947,586
|                          |  |                           |            |                               |   |                           |  |      |           |      |   |           |  |   |            |  |   |           



|                          |                                  |                |            |                                  |                                   |                                  |                                            |                                  |               |      |  |      |           |      |   |           |      |   |           |  |      |         |      |  |      |           |  |   |           |  |   |           |  |   |            |  |   |          
|------------------------- | -------------------------------- | -------------- | ---------- | -------------------------------- | --------------------------------- | -------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------ | -------------------------------- | ------------- | ---- |  | ---- | --------- | ---- | - | --------- | ---- | - | --------- |  | ---- | ------- | ---- |  | ---- | --------- |  | - | --------- |  | - | --------- |  | - | ---------- |  | - | ---------
|                          |                                  | Total Revenues |            |                                  | Income From Continuing Operations |                                  | Income (Loss) From Discontinued Operations |                                  | Net Income(2)
|                          | For the Years Ended December 31, |                |            | For the Years Ended December 31, |                                   | For the Years Ended December 31, |                                            | For the Years Ended December 31,
|                          | 2006                             |                | 2005       |                                  | 2004                              |                                  |                                            | 2006                             |               | 2005 |  | 2004 |           | 2006 |   |           | 2005 |   | 2004      |  | 2006 |         | 2005 |  | 2004
|Fund XIII-REIT Associates |                                  | $              | 6,709,500  |                                  | $                                 | 6,529,523                        |                                            | $                                | 6,183,310     | (1)  |  | $    | 1,513,029 |      | $ | 1,224,184 |      | $ | 900,711   |  | $    | (11,955 | )    |  | $    | 7,902,478 |  | $ | 1,642,985 |  | $ | 1,501,074 |  | $ | 9,126,662  |  | $ | 2,543,696
|Fund XIII-XIV Associates  |                                  |                | 3,292,924  |                                  |                                   | 3,188,176                        |                                            |                                  | 2,880,215     | (1)  |  |      | 1,064,498 |      |   | 968,288   |      |   | 819,173   |  |      | 0       |      |  |      | 0         |  |   | 0         |  |   | 1,064,498 |  |   | 968,288    |  |   | 819,173  
|                          |                                  |                |            |                                  |                                   |                                  |                                            |                                  |               |      |  |      |           |      |   |           |      |   |           |  |      |         |      |  |      |           |  |   |           |  |   |           |  |   |            |  |   |          
|                          |                                  | $              | 10,002,424 |                                  | $                                 | 9,717,699                        |                                            | $                                | 9,063,525     |      |  | $    | 2,577,527 |      | $ | 2,192,472 |      | $ | 1,719,884 |  | $    | (11,955 | )    |  | $    | 7,902,478 |  | $ | 1,642,985 |  | $ | 2,565,572 |  | $ | 10,094,950 |  | $ | 3,362,869
|                          |                                  |                |            |                                  |                                   |                                  |                                            |                                  |               |      |  |      |           |      |   |           |      |   |           |  |      |         |      |  |      |           |  |   |           |  |   |           |  |   |            |  |   |          



| | (1) | Through the first quarter 2004, the Joint Ventures reported the amortization of the fair values of
in-place leases, including opportunity costs associated with lost rentals that are avoided by acquiring in-place leases and tenant relationships, as an adjustment to rental income. In the second quarter 2004, the Joint Ventures began reflecting this
amortization as amortization expense and have reclassified such amortization amounts, including $242,366 and $115,150 for Fund XIII-REIT Associates and Fund XIII-XIV Associates, respectively, for the three months ended March 31, 2004, from
rental income to amortization expense for all periods previously presented. The period of amortization continues to be the term of the respective lease. This reclassification had no impact on net income.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | Effective July 1, 2004, the Joint Ventures extended the weighted-average composite useful life
for all building assets from 25 years to 40 years, which resulted in an increase to net income for the year ended December 31, 2004 of approximately $444,436 and $126,306 for Fund XIII-REIT Associates and Fund XIII-XIV Associates, respectively.
Management believes that this change more appropriately reflects the estimated useful lives of real estate assets and is consistent with prevailing industry practice.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Page F-13



---

The Partnership allocates its share of earnings generated by the properties owned by the Joint Ventures to its Cash
Preferred and Tax Preferred limited partners pursuant to the partnership agreement provisions outlined in Note 2 for net income, net loss, and gain on sale, respectively. The components of income (loss) from discontinued operations recognized by the
Joint Ventures are provided below:



|                          |  |               |         |   |             |   |       |  |   |                 |   |              |   |         |  |                 |           |             |   |           |  |   |           |  |   |   |  |   |          
|------------------------- |  | ------------- | ------- | - | ----------- | - | ----- |  | - | --------------- | - | ------------ | - | ------- |  | --------------- | --------- | ----------- | - | --------- |  | - | --------- |  | - | - |  | - | ---------
|                          |  | 2006          |         |   | 2005        |   | 2004 
|                          |  | OperatingLoss |         |   | Gainon Sale |   | Total |  |   | OperatingIncome |   | Gain on Sale |   | Total   |  | OperatingIncome |           | Gainon Sale |   | Total    
|Fund XIII-REIT Associates |  | $             | (11,955 | ) |             | $ | 0     |  | $ | (11,955         | ) |              | $ | 584,098 |  | $               | 7,318,380 |             | $ | 7,902,478 |  | $ | 1,642,985 |  | $ | 0 |  | $ | 1,642,985
|                          |  |               |         |   |             |   |       |  |   |                 |   |              |   |         |  |                 |           |             |   |           |  |   |           |  |   |   |  |   |          



|4. | RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS
|-- | --------------------------

Management and Leasing Fees

The Partnership has entered into a property management, leasing, and asset management agreement with Wells Management Company, Inc. (Wells
Management), an affiliate of the General Partners. In accordance with the property management and leasing agreement, Wells Management receives compensation for the management and leasing of the Partnerships properties, owned through the
Joint Ventures, equal to the lesser of (a) fees that would be paid to a comparable outside firm, which is assessed periodically based on market studies, or (b) 4.5% of the gross revenues collected monthly; plus, a separate competitive fee
for the one-time initial lease-up of newly constructed properties generally paid in conjunction with the receipt of the first months rent. In the case of commercial properties leased on a long-term net-lease basis (ten or more years), the
maximum property management fee from such leases shall be 1% of the gross revenues generally paid over the life of the leases except for a one-time initial leasing fee of 3% of the gross revenues on each lease payable over the first five full years
of the original lease term. Management and leasing fees are paid by the Joint Ventures and, accordingly, included in equity in income (loss) of joint ventures in the accompanying statements of operations. The Partnerships share of management
and leasing fees and lease acquisition costs incurred through the Joint Ventures that are payable to Wells Management and its affiliates is $86,980, $105,529, and $184,274 for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively.

Administrative Reimbursements

Wells Capital, one of
the Partnerships General Partners, and Wells Management perform certain administrative services for the Partnership, relating to accounting, property management and other partnership administration, and incur the related expenses. Such
expenses are allocated among other entities affiliated with the General Partners based on time spent on each fund by individual administrative personnel. In the opinion of the General Partners, this allocation is a reasonable estimation of such
expenses. The Partnership reimbursed Wells Capital and Wells Management for administrative expenses of $69,475, $84,233, and $80,233 for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively, which are included in general and
administrative expenses in the accompanying statements of operations. In addition, Wells Capital pays for certain operating expenses of the Partnership (bill-backs) directly, and generally invoices the Partnership for the reimbursement
thereof on a quarterly basis. As of December 31, 2006 and 2005, the due to affiliates balances represent administrative reimbursements and/or bill-backs due to Wells Management and/or Wells Capital.

Acquisition and Advisory Fees and Acquisition Expense Reimbursements

The Partnership has incurred acquisition and advisory fees and acquisition expense reimbursements payable to Wells Capital in an amount equal to 3.5% of aggregate gross offering proceeds. The Partnership applied deferred project costs
of $0, $0, and $118,219 upon investment in the Joint Ventures during 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively.



Page F-14



---

|5. | PER-UNIT AMOUNTS
|-- | ----------------

Income (loss) per limited partnership unit
amounts are calculated based upon weighted-average units outstanding during the respective periods. Income (loss) per limited partnership unit, as presented in the accompanying financial statements, will vary from the per-unit amounts attributable
to the individual investors due to the differences between the GAAP and tax basis treatment of certain items of income and expense and the fact that, within the respective classes of Cash Preferred Units and Tax Preferred Units, individual units
have different characteristics including capital bases, cumulative operating and net property sales proceeds distributions and cumulative earnings allocations as a result of, among other things, the ability of unit holders to elect to be treated as
Cash Preferred Units or Tax Preferred Units, or to change their prior elections, on a quarterly basis.

For the reasons mentioned above, distributions of
net sale proceeds per unit also vary among individual unit holders. Distributions of net sale proceeds have been calculated at the investor level pursuant to the partnership agreement and allocated between the Cash Preferred and Tax Preferred
limited partners in the period paid. Accordingly, distributions of net sale proceeds per unit, as presented in the accompanying financial statements, vary from the per-unit amounts attributable to the individual investors.



|6. | INCOME TAX BASIS NET INCOME AND PARTNERS CAPITAL
|-- | -------------------------------------------------

A
reconciliation of the Partnerships financial statement net income to net income presented in accordance with the Federal Income Tax basis of accounting is as follows for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004:



|                                                                                                                                         |  |      |           |   |      |   |           |      |  |   |           |    
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | --------- | - | ---- | - | --------- | ---- |  | - | --------- | ---
|                                                                                                                                         |  | 2006 |           |   | 2005 |   |           | 2004 | 
|Financial statement net income                                                                                                           |  | $    | 789,548   |   |      | $ | 3,028,062 |      |  | $ | 954,373   |    
|Increase (decrease) in net income resulting from:                                                                                        |  |      |           |   |      |   |           |      |  |   |           |    
|Depreciation expense for financial reporting purposes (less than) greater than amounts for income tax purposes                           |  |      | (104,683  | ) |      |   | (153,048  | )    |  |   | 17,209    | (1)
|Amortization expense for financial reporting purposes greater than amounts for income tax purposes                                       |  |      | 816,283   |   |      |   | 908,712   |      |  |   | 1,024,369 |    
|Capitalization of syndication costs for income tax purposes, which are accounted for as cost of capital for financial reporting
purposes |  |      | 0         |   |      |   | 0         |      |  |   | (143,302  | )  
|Bad debt (recoveries) expense for financial reporting purposes in excess of amounts for income tax purposes                              |  |      | 0         |   |      |   | (988      | )    |  |   | 988       |    
|Rental income for financial reporting purposes less than (greater than) amounts for income tax purposes                                  |  |      | 67,666    |   |      |   | (85,811   | )    |  |   | 0         |    
|Gains on sale of properties for financial reporting purposes in excess of amounts for income tax purposes                                |  |      | 0         |   |      |   | (240,208  | )    |  |   | 0         |    
|Other                                                                                                                                    |  |      | (3,271    | ) |      |   | (3,701    | )    |  |   | (14,573   | )  
|                                                                                                                                         |  |      |           |   |      |   |           |      |  |   |           |    
|Federal Income Tax basis net income                                                                                                      |  | $    | 1,565,543 |   |      | $ | 3,453,018 |      |  | $ | 1,839,064 |    
|                                                                                                                                         |  |      |           |   |      |   |           |      |  |   |           |    



| | (1) | Effective July 1, 2004, the Joint Ventures extended the weighted-average composite useful lives
for all building assets from 25 years to 40 years. This change has no impact on the statutory life used for Federal income tax purposes of 40 years, upon which tax depreciation is based (see Note 2).
| | --- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Page F-15



---

A reconciliation of the partners capital balances, as presented in the accompanying financial statements, to
partners capital balances, as presented in accordance with the Federal Income Tax basis of accounting, is as follows for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004:



|                                                                                                                                         |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |            |  
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ---------- | - | ---- | - | ---------- | ---- |  | - | ---------- | -
|                                                                                                                                         |  | 2006 |            |   | 2005 |   |            | 2004 | 
|Financial statement partners capital                                                                                                    |  | $    | 20,445,966 |   |      | $ | 21,451,852 |      |  | $ | 30,424,309 |  
|Increase (decrease) in partners capital resulting from:                                                                                 |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |            |  
|Accumulated depreciation expense for financial reporting purposes greater than amounts for income tax purposes                           |  |      | 114,396    |   |      |   | 219,079    |      |  |   | 372,127    |  
|Accumulated amortization expense for financial reporting purposes greater than amounts for income tax purposes                           |  |      | 2,987,221  |   |      |   | 2,170,938  |      |  |   | 1,262,226  |  
|Accumulated meals and entertainment                                                                                                      |  |      | 31         |   |      |   | 31         |      |  |   | 31         |  
|Accumulated bad debt (recoveries) expense, net, for financial reporting purposes in excess of amounts for income tax purposes            |  |      | (16        | ) |      |   | (16        | )    |  |   | 972        |  
|Capitalization of syndication costs for income tax purposes, which are accounted for as cost of capital for financial reporting
purposes |  |      | 4,568,769  |   |      |   | 4,568,769  |      |  |   | 4,568,769  |  
|Accumulated rental income for income tax purposes less than amounts for financial reporting purposes                                     |  |      | (109,982   | ) |      |   | (177,648   | )    |  |   | (91,837    | )
|Partnership distributions payable                                                                                                        |  |      | 464,806    |   |      |   | 473,594    |      |  |   | 665,486    |  
|Accumulated gains on sale of properties for financial reporting purposes in excess of amounts for income tax purposes                    |  |      | (240,208   | ) |      |   | (240,208   | )    |  |   | 0          |  
|Other                                                                                                                                    |  |      | (21,544    | ) |      |   | (18,274    | )    |  |   | (14,573    | )
|                                                                                                                                         |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |            |  
|Income tax basis partners capital                                                                                                       |  | $    | 28,209,439 |   |      | $ | 28,448,117 |      |  | $ | 37,187,510 |  
|                                                                                                                                         |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |            |  



Page F-16



---

|7. | QUARTERLY RESULTS (UNAUDITED)
|-- | -----------------------------

Presented below is a summary of the
unaudited quarterly financial information for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005:



|                                                                                      |  |                     |          |   |         |   |          |              |  |   |             |   |  |   |         |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------- | -------- | - | ------- | - | -------- | ------------ |  | - | ----------- | - |  | - | ------- | -
|                                                                                      |  | 2006 Quarters Ended |         
|                                                                                      |  | March 31            |          |   | June 30 |   |          | September 30 |  |   | December 31 |  
|Equity in income of joint ventures                                                    |  | $                   | 252,606  |   |         | $ | 243,066  |              |  | $ | 207,410     |   |  | $ | 222,377 |  
|Interest and other income                                                             |  | $                   | 1,204    |   |         | $ | 1,043    |              |  | $ | 569         |   |  | $ | 565     |  
|Net income                                                                            |  | $                   | 214,860  |   |         | $ | 205,483  |              |  | $ | 173,308     |   |  | $ | 195,897 |  
|Net income (loss) allocated to limited partners:                                      |  |                     |          |   |         |   |          |              |  |   |             |   |  |   |         |  
|Cash Preferred                                                                        |  | $                   | 522,354  |   |         | $ | 527,713  |              |  | $ | 485,316     |   |  | $ | 221,594 |  
|Tax Preferred                                                                         |  | $                   | (307,494 | ) |         | $ | (322,230 | )            |  | $ | (312,008    | ) |  | $ | (25,697 | )
|Net income (loss) per weighted-average limited partner unit outstanding:              |  |                     |          |   |         |   |          |              |  |   |             |   |  |   |         |  
|Cash Preferred(a)                                                                     |  |                     | $ 0.16   |   |         |   | $ 0.16   |              |  |   | $ 0.15      |   |  |   | $ 0.07  |  
|Tax Preferred                                                                         |  |                     | $(0.54   | ) |         |   | $(0.59   | )            |  |   | $(0.57      | ) |  |   | $(0.05  | )
|Distribution of operating cash per weighted-average limited partner unit outstanding: |  |                     |          |   |         |   |          |              |  |   |             |   |  |   |         |  
|Cash Preferred(b)                                                                     |  |                     | $ 0.14   |   |         |   | $ 0.14   |              |  |   | $ 0.13      |   |  |   | $ 0.14  |  
|Tax Preferred                                                                         |  |                     | $ 0.00   |   |         |   | $ 0.00   |              |  |   | $ 0.00      |   |  |   | $ 0.00  |  



| | (a) | The sum of the four quarterly amounts does not equal the respective annual amount presented in the
accompanying financial statements due to rounding.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | The quarterly per-unit amounts have been calculated using actual distributions for the respective
quarters. Conversely, the corresponding distributions per-unit amounts have been calculated assuming that distributions were earned ratably over the year. As a result, the sum of these quarterly per-unit amounts does not equal the respective annual
per-unit amount presented in the accompanying financial statements.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Page F-17



---

|                                                                                      |  |                     |          |   |         |   |              |  |   |             |   |  |   |          |  
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------- | -------- | - | ------- | - | ------------ |  | - | ----------- | - |  | - | -------- | -
|                                                                                      |  | 2005 Quarters Ended |         
|                                                                                      |  | March 31            |          |   | June 30 |   | September 30 |  |   | December 31 |  
|Equity in income of joint ventures                                                    |  | $                   | 352,776  |   |         | $ | 2,278,002    |  | $ | 175,821     |   |  | $ | 216,906  |  
|Interest and other income                                                             |  | $                   | 0        |   |         | $ | 6,695        |  | $ | 74,584      |   |  | $ | 87,232   |  
|Net income                                                                            |  | $                   | 321,654  |   |         | $ | 2,237,762    |  | $ | 206,080     |   |  | $ | 262,566  |  
|Net income (loss) allocated to limited partners:                                      |  |                     |          |   |         |   |              |  |   |             |   |  |   |          |  
|Cash Preferred                                                                        |  | $                   | 686,275  |   |         | $ | 500,580      |  | $ | 526,388     |   |  | $ | 582,639  |  
|Tax Preferred                                                                         |  | $                   | (364,621 | ) |         | $ | 1,737,182    |  | $ | (320,308    | ) |  | $ | (320,073 | )
|Net income (loss) per weighted-average limited partner unit outstanding:              |  |                     |          |   |         |   |              |  |   |             |   |  |   |          |  
|Cash Preferred                                                                        |  |                     | $ 0.22   |   |         |   | $0.16        |  |   | $ 0.17      |   |  |   | $ 0.18   |  
|Tax Preferred(a)                                                                      |  |                     | $(0.56   | ) |         |   | $2.74        |  |   | $(0.51      | ) |  |   | $(0.56   | )
|Distribution of operating cash per weighted-average limited partner unit outstanding: |  |                     |          |   |         |   |              |  |   |             |   |  |   |          |  
|Cash Preferred                                                                        |  |                     | $ 0.20   |   |         |   | $0.13        |  |   | $ 0.16      |   |  |   | $ 0.15   |  
|Tax Preferred                                                                         |  |                     | $ 0.00   |   |         |   | $0.00        |  |   | $ 0.00      |   |  |   | $ 0.00   |  
|Distribution of net property sale proceeds per weighted-average limited partner unit: |  |                     |          |   |         |   |              |  |   |             |   |  |   |          |  
|Cash Preferred(b)                                                                     |  |                     | $ 0.00   |   |         |   | $0.00        |  |   | $ 0.00      |   |  |   | $ 2.32   |  
|Tax Preferred(b)                                                                      |  |                     | $ 0.00   |   |         |   | $0.00        |  |   | $ 0.00      |   |  |   | $ 4.50   |  



| | (a) | The quarterly per-unit amounts have been calculated using actual income (loss) for the respective
quarters. Conversely, the corresponding annual income (loss) per-unit amounts have been calculated assuming that income (loss) was earned ratably over the year. As a result, the sum of these quarterly per-unit amounts does not equal the respective
annual per-unit amount presented in the accompanying financial statements.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | The quarterly per-unit amounts have been calculated using actual distributions for the respective
quarters. Conversely, the corresponding distributions per-unit amounts have been calculated assuming that distributions were earned ratably over the year. As a result, the sum of these quarterly per-unit amounts does not equal the respective annual
per-unit amount presented in the accompanying financial statements.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|8. | GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS
|-- | --------------------------------

General and administrative costs
for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004 are comprised of the following items:



|                                       |  |      |         |      |   |         |  |   |        
|-------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ------- | ---- | - | ------- |  | - | -------
|                                       |  | 2006 |         | 2005 |   | 2004   
|Salary reimbursements                  |  | $    | 69,475  |      | $ | 84,233  |  | $ | 80,233 
|Printing expenses                      |  |      | 27,647  |      |   | 24,438  |  |   | 19,163 
|Independent accounting fees            |  |      | 19,598  |      |   | 20,605  |  |   | 25,458 
|Legal fees                             |  |      | 8,329   |      |   | 14,973  |  |   | 23,550 
|Taxes and licensing fees               |  |      | 5,902   |      |   | 12,483  |  |   | 3,385  
|Postage and delivery expenses          |  |      | 4,584   |      |   | 3,812   |  |   | 8,114  
|Other professional fees                |  |      | 1,187   |      |   | 1,613   |  |   | 382    
|Computer costs                         |  |      | 1,126   |      |   | 1,478   |  |   | 1,995  
|Registration and filing fees           |  |      | 885     |      |   | 39      |  |   | 748    
|Life insurance                         |  |      | 559     |      |   | 280     |  |   | 559    
|Bank service charges                   |  |      | 0       |      |   | 0       |  |   | 821    
|                                       |  |      |         |      |   |         |  |   |        
|Total general and administrative costs |  | $    | 139,292 |      | $ | 163,954 |  | $ | 164,408
|                                       |  |      |         |      |   |         |  |   |        



Page F-18



---

|9. | SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
|-- | -----------------

Property Sale

On January 31, 2007, Fund XIII-XIV Associates sold 7500 Setzler Parkway to an unrelated third party for a gross sales price of $8,950,000. As a result of the sale,
the Partnership received net sale proceeds of approximately $4,126,000 and was allocated a gain of approximately $1,025,000, which may be adjusted as additional information becomes available in subsequent periods.

Purchase and Sale Agreement

On March 19, 2007, Fund XIII-XIV
Associates entered into a purchase and sale agreement to sell the Randstad  Atlanta Building to an unrelated third party. The completion of this transaction is currently subject to, among other things, a due diligence period expiring
on April 2, 2007. Accordingly, there are no assurances that this sale will be completed. If the transaction progresses, the Partnership believes the closing of this transaction is likely to occur during the second quarter of 2007.



Page F-19



---

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The General Partners of

Wells Fund XIII-REIT Joint Venture Partnership:

We have audited the
accompanying balance sheet of Wells Fund XIII-REIT Joint Venture Partnership (the Joint Venture) as of December 31, 2006, and the related statements of operations, partners capital, and cash flows for the year ended
December 31, 2006. Our audit also included the financial statement schedule listed in the index at Item 15(a). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Joint Ventures management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an
audit of the Joint Ventures internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not
for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Joint Ventures internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the
amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable
basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of
Wells Fund XIII-REIT Joint Venture Partnership as of December 31, 2006, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2006, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in
our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

/S/    FRAZIER & DEETER, LLC

Atlanta, Georgia

March 26, 2007



Page F-20



---

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The General Partners of

Wells Fund XIII-REIT Joint Venture Partnership:

We have audited the
accompanying balance sheet of Wells Fund XIII-REIT Joint Venture Partnership (the Joint Venture) as of December 31, 2005, and the related statements of operations, partners capital, and cash flows for each of the two years in
the period ended December 31, 2005. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule as of December 31, 2005 and for each of the two years in the period then ended listed in the index at Item 15(a). These financial statements
and schedule are the responsibility of the Joint Ventures management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance
about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Joint Ventures internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over
financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Joint Ventures internal control over financial reporting.
Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our
opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Wells Fund XIII-REIT Joint Venture Partnership at December 31, 2005, and the results of its operations and its cash flows
for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2005, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic
financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

/S/    ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Atlanta, Georgia

March 9, 2007



Page F-21



---

WELLS FUND XIII-REIT JOINT VENTURE PARTNERSHIP

BALANCE SHEETS

DECEMBER 31, 2006 AND 2005

ASSETS



|                                                                                                                                  |  |      |            |      |   |           
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ---------- | ---- | - | ----------
|                                                                                                                                  |  | 2006 |            | 2005
|Real estate assets, at cost:                                                                                                      |  |      |            |      |   |           
|Land                                                                                                                              |  | $    | 2,671,824  |      | $ | 2,671,824 
|Building and improvements, less accumulated depreciation of $3,832,345 and $3,025,256 at December 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively |  |      | 27,446,713 |      |   | 28,036,152
|Intangible lease assets, less accumulated amortization of $2,837,406 and $2,097,653 at December 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively   |  |      | 1,633,261  |      |   | 2,526,058 
|                                                                                                                                  |  |      |            |      |   |           
|Total real estate assets                                                                                                          |  |      | 31,751,798 |      |   | 33,234,034
|                                                                                                                                  |  |     
|Cash and cash equivalents                                                                                                         |  |      | 2,423,845  |      |   | 2,321,404 
|Tenant receivables, net                                                                                                           |  |      | 685,385    |      |   | 586,680   
|Deferred leasing costs, less accumulated amortization of $2,217,027 and $1,637,562 at December 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively    |  |      | 1,811,618  |      |   | 2,256,899 
|Other assets                                                                                                                      |  |      | 28,671     |      |   | 20,781    
|                                                                                                                                  |  |      |            |      |   |           
|Total assets                                                                                                                      |  | $    | 36,701,317 |      | $ | 38,419,798
|                                                                                                                                  |  |      |            |      |   |           

LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS CAPITAL



|                                                                                                                                |  |   |            |  |   |           
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | - | ---------- |  | - | ----------
|Liabilities:                                                                                                                    |  |   |            |  |   |           
|Intangible lease liabilities, less accumulated amortization of $131,243 and $91,658 at December 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively |  | $ | 57,408     |  | $ | 96,993    
|Accounts payable and accrued expenses                                                                                           |  |   | 1,338,516  |  |   | 1,445,920 
|Due to affiliates                                                                                                               |  |   | 629        |  |   | 7,506     
|Deferred income                                                                                                                 |  |   | 166,256    |  |   | 331,489   
|Partnership distributions payable                                                                                               |  |   | 925,684    |  |   | 515,233   
|                                                                                                                                |  |   |            |  |   |           
|Total liabilities                                                                                                               |  |   | 2,488,493  |  |   | 2,397,141 
|                                                                                                                                |  |  
|Partners capital:                                                                                                              |  |   |            |  |   |           
|Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P.                                                                                               |  |   | 9,617,225  |  |   | 10,125,969
|Wells Operating Partnership, L.P.                                                                                               |  |   | 24,595,599 |  |   | 25,896,688
|                                                                                                                                |  |   |            |  |   |           
|Total partners capital                                                                                                         |  |   | 34,212,824 |  |   | 36,022,657
|                                                                                                                                |  |   |            |  |   |           
|Total liabilities and partners capital                                                                                         |  | $ | 36,701,317 |  | $ | 38,419,798
|                                                                                                                                |  |   |            |  |   |           

See accompanying notes.



Page F-22



---

WELLS FUND XIII-REIT JOINT VENTURE PARTNERSHIP

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED

DECEMBER 31, 2006, 2005, AND 2004



|                                           |  |      |           |   |      |   |           |  |   |          
|------------------------------------------ |  | ---- | --------- | - | ---- | - | --------- |  | - | ---------
|                                           |  | 2006 |           |   | 2005 |   | 2004     
|REVENUES:                                  |  |      |           |   |      |   |           |  |   |          
|Rental income                              |  | $    | 4,165,286 |   |      | $ | 4,126,560 |  | $ | 4,099,320
|Reimbursement income                       |  |      | 2,456,045 |   |      |   | 2,323,268 |  |   | 2,081,487
|Lease termination income                   |  |      | 0         |   |      |   | 20,000    |  |   | 0        
|Interest and other income                  |  |      | 88,169    |   |      |   | 59,695    |  |   | 2,503    
|                                           |  |      |           |   |      |   |           |  |   |          
|Total revenues                             |  |      | 6,709,500 |   |      |   | 6,529,523 |  |   | 6,183,310
|                                           |  |      |          
|EXPENSES:                                  |  |      |           |   |      |   |           |  |   |          
|Property operating costs                   |  |      | 2,497,031 |   |      |   | 2,451,901 |  |   | 2,058,185
|Management and leasing fees                |  |      | 287,101   |   |      |   | 258,559   |  |   | 394,455  
|Depreciation                               |  |      | 807,089   |   |      |   | 786,560   |  |   | 1,011,681
|Amortization                               |  |      | 1,524,625 |   |      |   | 1,658,128 |  |   | 1,714,929
|Lease termination expense                  |  |      | 0         |   |      |   | 48,605    |  |   | 0        
|General and administrative                 |  |      | 80,625    |   |      |   | 101,586   |  |   | 103,349  
|                                           |  |      |           |   |      |   |           |  |   |          
|Total expenses                             |  |      | 5,196,471 |   |      |   | 5,305,339 |  |   | 5,282,599
|                                           |  |      |           |   |      |   |           |  |   |          
|NET INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS      |  |      | 1,513,029 |   |      |   | 1,224,184 |  |   | 900,711  
|                                           |  |      |          
|DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS:                   |  |      |           |   |      |   |           |  |   |          
|Operating income (loss)                    |  |      | (11,955   | ) |      |   | 584,098   |  |   | 1,642,985
|Gain on disposition                        |  |      | 0         |   |      |   | 7,318,380 |  |   | 0        
|                                           |  |      |           |   |      |   |           |  |   |          
|Income (loss) from discontinued operations |  |      | (11,955   | ) |      |   | 7,902,478 |  |   | 1,642,985
|                                           |  |      |           |   |      |   |           |  |   |          
|NET INCOME                                 |  | $    | 1,501,074 |   |      | $ | 9,126,662 |  | $ | 2,543,696
|                                           |  |      |           |   |      |   |           |  |   |          

See accompanying notes.



Page F-23



---

WELLS FUND XIII-REIT JOINT VENTURE PARTNERSHIP

STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS CAPITAL

FOR THE YEARS ENDED

DECEMBER 31, 2006, 2005, AND 2004



|                           |  |                                   |             |   |                                  |   |             |                         |  |   |             |  
|-------------------------- |  | --------------------------------- | ----------- | - | -------------------------------- | - | ----------- | ----------------------- |  | - | ----------- | -
|                           |  | Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P. |             |   | Wells OperatingPartnership, L.P. |   |             | Total Partners Capital | 
|Balance, December 31, 2003 |  | $                                 | 19,627,634  |   |                                  | $ | 50,559,897  |                         |  | $ | 70,187,531  |  
|                           |  |                                   |            
|Net income                 |  |                                   | 715,033     |   |                                  |   | 1,828,663   |                         |  |   | 2,543,696   |  
|Partnership distributions  |  |                                   | (1,677,211  | ) |                                  |   | (4,289,386  | )                       |  |   | (5,966,597  | )
|                           |  |                                   |             |   |                                  |   |             |                         |  |   |             |  
|Balance, December 31, 2004 |  |                                   | 18,665,456  |   |                                  |   | 48,099,174  |                         |  |   | 66,764,630  |  
|                           |  |                                   |            
|Net income                 |  |                                   | 2,565,505   |   |                                  |   | 6,561,157   |                         |  |   | 9,126,662   |  
|Partnership distributions  |  |                                   | (11,104,992 | ) |                                  |   | (28,763,643 | )                       |  |   | (39,868,635 | )
|                           |  |                                   |             |   |                                  |   |             |                         |  |   |             |  
|Balance, December 31, 2005 |  |                                   | 10,125,969  |   |                                  |   | 25,896,688  |                         |  |   | 36,022,657  |  
|                           |  |                                   |            
|Net income                 |  |                                   | 421,952     |   |                                  |   | 1,079,122   |                         |  |   | 1,501,074   |  
|Partnership distributions  |  |                                   | (930,696    | ) |                                  |   | (2,380,211  | )                       |  |   | (3,310,907  | )
|                           |  |                                   |             |   |                                  |   |             |                         |  |   |             |  
|Balance, December 31, 2006 |  | $                                 | 9,617,225   |   |                                  | $ | 24,595,599  |                         |  | $ | 34,212,824  |  
|                           |  |                                   |             |   |                                  |   |             |                         |  |   |             |  

See accompanying notes.



Page F-24



---

WELLS FUND XIII-REIT JOINT VENTURE PARTNERSHIP

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED

DECEMBER 31, 2006, 2005, AND 2004



|                                                                                         |  |      |            |   |      |   |             |      |  |   |            |  
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ---------- | - | ---- | - | ----------- | ---- |  | - | ---------- | -
|                                                                                         |  | 2006 |            |   | 2005 |   |             | 2004 | 
|CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:                                                    |  |      |            |   |      |   |             |      |  |   |            |  
|Net income                                                                               |  | $    | 1,501,074  |   |      | $ | 9,126,662   |      |  | $ | 2,543,696  |  
|Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:        |  |      |            |   |      |   |             |      |  |   |            |  
|Gain on disposition                                                                      |  |      | 0          |   |      |   | (7,318,380  | )    |  |   | 0          |  
|Depreciation                                                                             |  |      | 807,089    |   |      |   | 882,866     |      |  |   | 1,781,828  |  
|Amortization                                                                             |  |      | 1,504,695  |   |      |   | 1,747,387   |      |  |   | 2,270,146  |  
|Lease termination expense                                                                |  |      | 0          |   |      |   | 48,605      |      |  |   | 0          |  
|(Increase) decrease in tenant receivables, net                                           |  |      | (98,705    | ) |      |   | 63,157      |      |  |   | (350,282   | )
|(Increase) decrease in other assets                                                      |  |      | (7,890     | ) |      |   | 14,396      |      |  |   | 541,756    |  
|(Decrease) increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses                             |  |      | (107,404   | ) |      |   | 344,582     |      |  |   | 41,152     |  
|(Decrease) increase in due to affiliates                                                 |  |      | (6,877     | ) |      |   | (18,699     | )    |  |   | 19,673     |  
|Decrease in deferred income                                                              |  |      | (165,233   | ) |      |   | (3,111      | )    |  |   | (130,210   | )
|                                                                                         |  |      |            |   |      |   |             |      |  |   |            |  
|Net cash provided by operating activities                                                |  |      | 3,426,749  |   |      |   | 4,887,465   |      |  |   | 6,717,759  |  
|                                                                                         |  |      |           
|CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:                                                    |  |      |            |   |      |   |             |      |  |   |            |  
|Net proceeds from sale of real estate assets                                             |  |      | 0          |   |      |   | 35,729,400  |      |  |   | 0          |  
|Investment in real estate assets                                                         |  |      | (217,650   | ) |      |   | (38,769     | )    |  |   | (218,924   | )
|Payment of deferred leasing costs                                                        |  |      | (206,202   | ) |      |   | (256,679    | )    |  |   | (39,964    | )
|                                                                                         |  |      |            |   |      |   |             |      |  |   |            |  
|Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities                                      |  |      | (423,852   | ) |      |   | 35,433,952  |      |  |   | (258,888   | )
|                                                                                         |  |      |           
|CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:                                                    |  |      |            |   |      |   |             |      |  |   |            |  
|Net sale proceeds distributions paid to joint venturepartners                            |  |      | 0          |   |      |   | (35,729,400 | )    |  |   | 0          |  
|Operating distributions paid to joint venture partners in excess of accumulated earnings |  |      | (2,900,456 | ) |      |   | (4,453,663  | )    |  |   | (6,731,264 | )
|Contributions from joint venture partners                                                |  |      | 0          |   |      |   | 0           |      |  |   | 0          |  
|                                                                                         |  |      |            |   |      |   |             |      |  |   |            |  
|Net cash used in financing activities                                                    |  |      | (2,900,456 | ) |      |   | (40,183,063 | )    |  |   | (6,731,264 | )
|                                                                                         |  |      |           
|NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS                                     |  |      | 102,441    |   |      |   | 138,354     |      |  |   | (272,393   | )
|                                                                                         |  |      |           
|CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of year                                             |  |      | 2,321,404  |   |      |   | 2,183,050   |      |  |   | 2,455,443  |  
|                                                                                         |  |      |            |   |      |   |             |      |  |   |            |  
|CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of year                                                   |  | $    | 2,423,845  |   |      | $ | 2,321,404   |      |  | $ | 2,183,050  |  
|                                                                                         |  |      |            |   |      |   |             |      |  |   |            |  
|                                                                                         |  |      |           
|SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:                   |  |      |            |   |      |   |             |      |  |   |            |  
|Partnership distributions payable                                                        |  | $    | 925,684    |   |      | $ | 515,233     |      |  | $ | 829,661    |  
|                                                                                         |  |      |            |   |      |   |             |      |  |   |            |  
|Write-off of fully amortized deferred leasing costs                                      |  | $    | 72,018     |   |      | $ | 190,163     |      |  | $ | 0          |  
|                                                                                         |  |      |            |   |      |   |             |      |  |   |            |  
|Write-off of fully amortized intangible lease assets                                     |  | $    | 153,044    |   |      | $ | 0           |      |  | $ | 0          |  
|                                                                                         |  |      |            |   |      |   |             |      |  |   |            |  

See accompanying notes.



Page F-25



---

WELLS FUND XIII-REIT JOINT VENTURE PARTNERSHIP

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2006, 2005, AND 2004



|1. | ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS
|-- | -------------------------

On June 27, 2001, Wells Real Estate
Fund XIII, L.P. (Fund XIII) and Wells Operating Partnership, L.P. (Wells OP) entered into a Georgia general partnership to form Wells Fund XIII-REIT Joint Venture Partnership (the Joint Venture). The general
partners of Fund XIII are Leo F. Wells, III and Wells Capital, Inc. (Wells Capital). Wells OP is a Delaware limited partnership with Wells Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. (Wells REIT) serving as its general partner. Wells
REIT is a Maryland corporation that qualifies as a real estate investment trust.

The Joint Venture was formed to acquire and operate commercial real
properties, including properties to be developed, currently under development or construction, newly constructed or having operating histories. On July 16, 2001, the Joint Venture purchased a two-story office building containing approximately
85,000 square feet, the AmeriCredit Building, located in Orange Park, Florida. On December 21, 2001, the Joint Venture purchased two connected one-story office and assembly buildings consisting of approximately 148,000 square feet, 8560 Upland
Drive (formerly known as the ADIC Buildings), located in Parker, Colorado. On December 12, 2002, the Joint Venture purchased a four-story office building containing approximately 141,000 square feet, the John Wiley Building, located
in Fishers, Indiana. On September 19, 2003, the Joint Venture purchased a four-story office building containing approximately 194,000 square feet, the AIU  Chicago Building, located in Hoffman Estates, Illinois. Ownership interests were
recomputed based on relative cumulative capital contributions from the joint venture partners.

On April 13, 2005, the Joint Venture sold the
AmeriCredit Building and the John Wiley Building to an unrelated third party for an aggregate gross selling price of $35,974,000. As a result of the sale, the Joint Venture recognized a gain of approximately $7,318,000 and received net sale proceeds
of approximately $35,729,000.



|2. | SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|-- | ------------------------------------------

Basis of
Presentation

The Joint Ventures financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP).

Use of Estimates

The preparation
of the Joint Ventures financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses and related disclosures of contingent
assets and liabilities in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Revenue Recognition

The Joint Ventures leases typically include renewal options, escalation provisions and provisions requiring tenants to reimburse the Joint
Venture for a pro-rata share of operating costs incurred. All of the Joint Ventures leases are classified as operating leases, and the related rental income, including scheduled rental rate increases (other than scheduled increases based on
the Consumer Price Index) is recognized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the respective leases. Rents and tenant reimbursements collected in advance are recorded as deferred income in the accompanying balance sheets.

Lease termination income is recognized when the tenant loses the right to lease the space and the Joint Venture has satisfied all obligations under the related lease or
lease termination agreement.



Page F-26



---

The Joint Venture records the sale of real estate assets pursuant to the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 66, Accounting for Sales of Real Estate. Accordingly, gains are recognized upon completing the sale and, among other things, determining the sale price and transferring all of the risks and rewards of
ownership without significant continuing involvement with the seller. Recognition of all or a portion of the gain would be deferred until both of these conditions are met. Losses are recognized in full as of the sale date.

Real Estate Assets

Real estate assets are stated at cost, less
accumulated depreciation. Amounts capitalized to real estate assets consist of the cost of acquisition or construction, and any tenant improvements or major improvements and betterments which extend the useful life of the related asset. We consider
the period of future benefit of the asset to determine the appropriate useful lives. These assessments have a direct impact on net income. Upon receiving notification of a tenants intention to terminate a lease, undepreciated tenant
improvements are written off to lease termination expense. All repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred.

The
estimated useful lives of the Joint Ventures real estate assets by class are provided below:



|                        |  |                                       
|----------------------- |  | --------------------------------------
|Buildings               |  | 40 years                              
|Building improvements   |  | 5-25 years                            
|Land improvements       |  | 20 years                              
|Tenant improvements     |  | Shorter of lease term or economic life
|Intangible lease assets |  | Lease term                            

Management continually monitors events and changes in circumstances that could indicate that the carrying amounts
of the real estate assets and related intangible assets owned by the Joint Venture may not be recoverable. When indicators of potential impairment are present management assesses whether the respective carrying values will be recovered with the
undiscounted future operating cash flows expected from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition for assets held for use, or with the estimated fair values, less costs to sell, for assets held for sale. In the event that the expected
undiscounted future cash flows for assets held for use or the estimated fair value, less costs to sell, for assets held for sale do not exceed the respective asset carrying value, management adjusts such assets to the respective estimated fair
values, as defined by SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, and recognizes an impairment loss. Estimated fair values are calculated based on the following information, dependent upon availability,
in order of preference: (i) recently quoted market prices, (ii) market prices for comparable properties, or (iii) the present value of undiscounted cash flows, including estimated salvage value. The Joint Venture has determined that
there has been no impairment in the carrying value of any of the real estate assets held as of December 31, 2006.

In the third quarter of 2004, the
Joint Venture completed a review of its real estate depreciation by performing an analysis of the components of each property type in an effort to determine weighted-average composite useful lives of its real estate assets. As a result of this
review, the Joint Venture changed its estimate of the weighted-average composite useful lives for all building assets. Effective July 1, 2004, for all building assets, the Joint Venture extended the weighted-average composite useful life from
25 years to 40 years. The change resulted in an increase to net income of approximately $444,436 for the year ended December 31, 2004. We believe the change more appropriately reflects the estimated useful lives of the building assets and is
consistent with prevailing industry practice.

Allocation of Purchase Price of Acquired Assets

Upon the acquisition of real properties, it is the Joint Ventures policy to allocate the purchase price of properties to acquired tangible assets, consisting of
land and building, and identified intangible assets and liabilities, consisting of the value of above-market and below-market leases, and the value of in-place leases, based in each case on their estimated fair values.



Page F-27



---

The fair values of the tangible assets of an acquired property (which includes land and building) are determined by
valuing the property as if it were vacant, and the as-if-vacant value is then allocated to land and building based on managements determination of the relative fair value of these assets. Management determines the as-if vacant fair
value of a property using methods similar to those used by independent appraisers. Factors considered by management in performing these analyses include an estimate of carrying costs during the expected lease-up periods considering current market
conditions and costs to execute similar leases. In estimating carrying costs, management includes real estate taxes, insurance, and other operating expenses during the expected lease-up periods based on current market demand. Management estimates
costs to execute similar leases including leasing commissions, and other related costs.

The fair values of above-market and below-market in-place leases
are recorded based on the present value (using an interest rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases and
(ii) managements estimate of market rates for the corresponding in-place leases, measured over a period equal to the remaining terms of the leases. The capitalized above-market and below-market lease values are recorded as intangible
lease assets or liabilities and amortized as an adjustment to rental income over the remaining terms of the respective leases.

The fair values of in-place
leases include direct costs associated with obtaining a new tenant, opportunity costs associated with lost rentals which are avoided by acquiring an in-place lease, and tenant relationships. Direct costs associated with obtaining a new tenant
include commissions, tenant improvements and other direct costs and are estimated based on managements consideration of current market costs to execute a similar lease. These direct costs are included in deferred leasing costs in the
accompanying balance sheets and are amortized to expense over the remaining terms of the respective leases. The value of opportunity costs is calculated using the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases over a market
absorption period for a similar lease. Customer relationships are valued based on expected renewal of a lease or the likelihood of obtaining a particular tenant for other locations. The value of absorption period costs and tenant relationships are
included in intangible lease assets in the accompanying balance sheets and are amortized to expense over the remaining terms of the respective leases.

The
gross values of above-market in-place leases were approximately $84,000 as of December 31, 2006 and $108,000 as of December 31, 2005 and the gross values of intangible absorption period costs were approximately $4,386,000 as of
December 31, 2006 and $4,516,000 as of December 31, 2005, both of which are recorded as intangible lease assets. The gross values of intangible lease origination costs were approximately $3,574,000 and $3,646,000 as of December 31,
2006 and 2005, respectively, and are included in deferred leasing costs. The gross values of below-market in-place leases was approximately $188,000 as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and are recorded as intangible lease liabilities.

The Joint Venture recorded amortization of above-market and below-market in-place leases of approximately $20,000, $89,000, and $555,000 during the years ended
December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively, which is recorded as an adjustment to rental revenues. The Joint Venture recorded amortization of intangible lease origination costs and intangible absorption period costs of approximately
$1,513,000, $1,658,000, and $1,715,000 during the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively, which is recorded as amortization expense in the accompanying statements of operations.



Page F-28



---

The remaining unamortized balance for intangible assets and liabilities will be
amortized as follows:



|                                     |  |                         |           |                                        |   |                                   |  |   |         |  |   |          
|------------------------------------ |  | ----------------------- | --------- | -------------------------------------- | - | --------------------------------- |  | - | ------- |  | - | ---------
|                                     |  | Intangible Lease Assets |           | Intangible Below-Market LeaseLiability |   | Intangible LeaseOrigination Costs
|                                     |  | AbsorptionPeriod Costs  |           | Intangible LeaseOrigination Costs      |   |                                  
|For the year ending December 31:     |  |                         |           |                                        |   |                                   |  |   |         |  |   |          
|2007                                 |  | $                       | 800,081   |                                        | $ | 16,479                            |  | $ | 30,995  |  | $ | 636,882  
|2008                                 |  |                         | 473,508   |                                        |   | 13,732                            |  |   | 12,226  |  |   | 382,764  
|2009                                 |  |                         | 164,731   |                                        |   | 0                                 |  |   | 7,094   |  |   | 179,056  
|2010                                 |  |                         | 164,730   |                                        |   | 0                                 |  |   | 7,093   |  |   | 179,055  
|Thereafter                           |  |                         | 0         |                                        |   | 0                                 |  |   | 0       |  |   | 0        
|                                     |  |                         |           |                                        |   |                                   |  |   |         |  |   |          
|                                     |  | $                       | 1,603,050 |                                        | $ | 30,211                            |  | $ | 57,408  |  | $ | 1,377,757
|                                     |  |                         |           |                                        |   |                                   |  |   |         |  |   |          
|                                     |  |                         |           |                                       
|Weighted-Average Amortization Period |  |                         | 4 years   |                                        |   | 2 years                           |  |   | 4 years |  |   | 4 years  

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Joint Venture considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents include cash and short-term investments. Short-term
investments are stated at cost, which approximates fair value, and consist of investments in money market accounts.

Tenant Receivables, net

Tenant receivables are comprised of tenant receivables and straight-line rent receivables. Management assesses the collectibility of tenant receivables
on an ongoing basis and provides for allowances as such balances, or portions thereof, become uncollectible. Upon receiving notification of a tenants intention to terminate a lease, unamortized straight-line rent receivables are written off to
lease termination expense. Allowances of $77,831 and $0 are included in tenant receivables as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

Deferred Leasing Costs, net

Deferred leasing costs reflect costs incurred to procure operating leases, including opportunity costs avoided
by acquiring an in-place lease identified in connection with the purchase price allocation process, which are capitalized and amortized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the respective leases. The remaining unamortized balance of deferred
leasing costs will be amortized over a weighted-average period of approximately four years. Upon receiving notification of a tenants intention to terminate a lease, unamortized deferred leasing costs are written-off to lease termination
expense.

Other Assets

Other assets as of
December 31, 2006 and 2005 is comprised of the following items:



|                       |  |      |        |      |   |       
|---------------------- |  | ---- | ------ | ---- | - | ------
|                       |  | 2006 |        | 2005
|Prepaid insurance      |  | $    | 19,721 |      | $ | 20,725
|Interest receivable    |  |      | 7,938  |      |   | 0     
|Prepaid contract labor |  |      | 1,012  |      |   | 56    
|                       |  |      |        |      |   |       
|Total                  |  | $    | 28,671 |      | $ | 20,781
|                       |  |      |        |      |   |       

Prepaid expenses are recognized as the related services are provided. Interest receivable represents interest
earned during the period presented, which will be received in the following month. Balances without a future economic benefit are written-off as they are identified.



Page F-29



---

Allocation of Income and Distributions

Pursuant to the terms of the joint venture agreement, income and distributions are allocated to the joint venture partners based their respective ownership interests as determined by relative cumulative capital
contributions, as defined. For the periods presented, Fund XIII and Wells OP held ownership interests in the Joint Venture of approximately 28% and 72%, respectively. Net cash from operations is generally distributed to the joint venture partners on
a quarterly basis.

Income Taxes

The Joint Venture is
not subject to federal or state income taxes; therefore, none have been provided for in the accompanying financial statements. The partners of Fund XIII and Wells OP are required to include their respective share of profits and losses from the Joint
Venture in their individual income tax returns.

Reclassifications

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In September 2006, the Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures required for fair value measurements under
GAAP, including amending SFAS No. 144. SFAS No. 157 emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement, as opposed to an entity-specific measurement. SFAS No. 157 will be effective for the Joint Venture beginning January 1,
2008. The Joint Venture is currently assessing provisions and evaluating the financial impact of SFAS No. 157 on its financial statements, however, does not believe the adoption of this pronouncement will have a material impact on its financial
statements.

In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 108, Considering the
Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements, which provides interpretive guidance on the consideration of the effects of prior year misstatements in quantifying current year
misstatements for the purpose of a materiality assessment. SAB No. 108 is effective for fiscal years ending after November 15, 2006, and is effective for the Joint Venture for the year ended December 31, 2006. The adoption of this
pronouncement has not had a material impact on the Joint Ventures financial statements.

In July 2006, the FASB issued Financial Accounting Standards
Board Interpretation (FIN) No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, which clarifies the relevant criteria and approach for the recognition, derecognition, and
measurement of uncertain tax positions. FIN No. 48 will be effective for the Joint Venture beginning January 1, 2007. The Joint Venture is currently assessing provisions and evaluating the financial impact of FIN No. 48 on its
financial statements, however, does not believe the adoption of this pronouncement will have a material impact on its financial statements.

In June 2005,
the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections, which replaces Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 20, Accounting Changes, and SFAS No. 3, Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial
Statements. SFAS No. 154 changes the method to account for and report changes in accounting principles and corrections of errors. Previously, most voluntary changes in accounting principles required recognition as a cumulative effect
adjustment to net income during the period in which the change was adopted. Conversely, in circumstances where applicable accounting guidance does not include specific transition provisions, SFAS No. 154 requires retrospective application to
prior periods financial statements unless it is impractical to determine either the period-specific effects or the cumulative effect of the change. SFAS No. 154 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005;
however, it does not change the transition provisions of any of the existing accounting pronouncements. The adoption of this pronouncement has not had a material impact on the Joint Ventures financial statements.



Page F-30



---

|3. | RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS
|-- | --------------------------

Management and Leasing Fees

The joint venture partners, Fund XIII and Wells OP are both parties to individual property management and leasing agreements with Wells Management
Company, Inc. (Wells Management), an affiliate of each of their respective general partners.

The various fees
payable under each of the respective agreements are summarized as follows:



|          |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |  |                                                                                                                                                                   
|--------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|          |  | Management and Leasing Services                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            |  | Management and Leasing Services Industrial and Commercial properties leased on a net basis for ten years or more                                                 
|Fund XIII |  | Lesser of market rate charged for similar services for similar properties in the same geographic area, or 4.5% of gross revenues generally paid over the
life of the lease, plus an additional initial lease up fee for newly constructed properties based on market rate charged for similar services for similar properties in the same geographic area. |  | Initial lease up fee based on 3% of the gross revenues over the first five years of the lease term.
Recurring fee based on 1% of gross revenues collected monthly.
|          |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           
|Wells OP  |  | Lesser of 4.5% of gross revenues generally paid over the life of the lease or .6% of Net Asset Value calculated annually                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   |  | Not applicable                                                                                                                                                    

Management and leasing fees are recognized in accordance with the terms of the aforementioned agreements, weighted
based on joint venture partners respective ownership interests in the Joint Venture. During the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004, the Joint Venture incurred management and leasing fees that are payable to Wells Management and its
affiliates of $152,101, $190,571, and $444,088, respectively, portions of which are included in income (loss) from discontinued operations in the accompanying statements of operations.

Administrative Reimbursements

Wells Management and its affiliates perform certain administrative services for the
Joint Ventures properties, relating to accounting, property management, and other partnership administration, and incur the related expenses. Such expenses are allocated among these entities based on time spent on each entity by individual
personnel. In the opinion of management, this is a reasonable estimation of such expenses. During 2006, 2005, and 2004, the Joint Venture reimbursed $23,131, $46,690, and $76,870, respectively, to Wells Management and its affiliates for these
services, portions of which are included in income (loss) from discontinued operations in the accompanying statements of operations.

Assignment of
Related-Party Agreements

Wells Capital and Wells Management assigned rights to receive certain fees and reimbursements with Wells OP to Wells Advisory
Services I, LLC (WASI). WASI assigned its rights to receive certain fees and reimbursements to Wells Real Estate Advisory Services, Inc. (WREAS), a wholly owned subsidiary of WASI. Accordingly, the Joint Venture began paying
property management fees and administrative reimbursements to WREAS.



Page F-31



---

Due to Affiliates

As
of December 31, 2006 and 2005, due to affiliates was comprised of the following items due to WREAS and /or Wells Management:



|                              |  |      |     |      |   |      
|----------------------------- |  | ---- | --- | ---- | - | -----
|                              |  | 2006 |     | 2005
|Administrative reimbursements |  | $    | 629 |      | $ | 4,223
|Property management fees      |  |      | 0   |      |   | 3,283
|                              |  |      |     |      |   |      
|                              |  | $    | 629 |      | $ | 7,506
|                              |  |      |     |      |   |      



|4. | DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
|-- | -----------------------

In accordance with SFAS No. 144, the
Joint Venture has classified the results of operations related to the office components of the AmeriCredit Building and the John Wiley Building, which were sold on April 13, 2005, as discontinued operations in the accompanying statements of
operations. The details comprising income (loss) from discontinued operations are presented below:



|                                           |  |      |         |   |      |   |           |  |   |          
|------------------------------------------ |  | ---- | ------- | - | ---- | - | --------- |  | - | ---------
|                                           |  | 2006 |         |   | 2005 |   | 2004     
|Rental income                              |  | $    | 0       |   |      | $ | 975,715   |  | $ | 3,220,863
|Reimbursement income                       |  |      | 65,493  |   |      |   | 94,506    |  |   | 296,842  
|Interest and other income                  |  |      | 383     |   |      |   | 0         |  |   | 420      
|                                           |  |      |         |   |      |   |           |  |   |          
|Total revenues                             |  |      | 65,876  |   |      |   | 1,070,221 |  |   | 3,518,125
|                                           |  |      |        
|Property operating costs                   |  |      | 0       |   |      |   | 266,348   |  |   | 717,764  
|Management and leasing fees                |  |      | 0       |   |      |   | 66,905    |  |   | 233,099  
|Depreciation                               |  |      | 0       |   |      |   | 96,306    |  |   | 770,146  
|Bad debt expense                           |  |      | 77,831  |   |      |   | 0         |  |   | 0        
|General and administrative                 |  |      | 0       |   |      |   | 56,564    |  |   | 154,131  
|                                           |  |      |         |   |      |   |           |  |   |          
|Total expenses                             |  |      | 77,831  |   |      |   | 486,123   |  |   | 1,875,140
|                                           |  |      |         |   |      |   |           |  |   |          
|Operating income (loss)                    |  |      | (11,955 | ) |      |   | 584,098   |  |   | 1,642,985
|Gain on disposition                        |  |      | 0       |   |      |   | 7,318,380 |  |   | 0        
|                                           |  |      |         |   |      |   |           |  |   |          
|Income (loss) from discontinued operations |  | $    | (11,955 | ) |      | $ | 7,902,478 |  | $ | 1,642,985
|                                           |  |      |         |   |      |   |           |  |   |          



|5. | RENTAL INCOME
|-- | -------------

The future minimum rental income due to the Joint
Venture under non-cancelable operating leases as of December 31, 2006 follows:



|                        |  |   |           
|----------------------- |  | - | ----------
|Year ended December 31: |  |   |           
|2007                    |  | $ | 3,958,463 
|2008                    |  |   | 3,803,189 
|2009                    |  |   | 3,871,365 
|2010                    |  |   | 3,973,700 
|2011                    |  |   | 1,461,219 
|Thereafter              |  |   | 0         
|                        |  |   |           
|                        |  | $ | 17,067,936
|                        |  |   |           

Three tenants generated approximately 55%, 33%, and 11% of rental income for the year ended December 31,
2006, and two tenants will generate approximately 57% and 41% of future minimum rental income.



Page F-32



---

SCHEDULE III  REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

AND AMORTIZATION

DECEMBER 31, 2006



|                                                              |  |              |  |              |           |                                             |   |                                               |      |   |                            |  |                        |           |                         |   |            |  |                                           |           |                      |   |               |  |   |            |  |   |           |  |      |  |         
|------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ------------ |  | ------------ | --------- | ------------------------------------------- | - | --------------------------------------------- | ---- | - | -------------------------- |  | ---------------------- | --------- | ----------------------- | - | ---------- |  | ----------------------------------------- | --------- | -------------------- | - | ------------- |  | - | ---------- |  | - | --------- |  | ---- |  | --------
|                                                              |  |              |  | Initial Cost |           | CostsCapitalizedSubsequent ToAcquisition(d) |   | Gross Carrying Amount as of December 31, 2006 |      |   |                            |  |                        |          
|Description                                                   |  | Encumbrances |  | Land         |           | Buildings and Improvements                  |   |                                               | Land |   | Buildings and Improvements |  | Intangible Lease Asset |           | Constructionin Progress |   | Total      |  | Accumulated Depreciation &Amortization(c) |           | Date of Construction |   | Date Acquired
|8560 UPLAND DRIVE (formerly known as the ADIC Buildings)(a) |  | None         |  | $            | 1,954,213 |                                             | $ | 11,215,621                                    |      | $ | 542,281                    |  | $                      | 2,047,735 |                         | $ | 11,664,380 |  | $                                         | 0         |                      | $ | 0             |  | $ | 13,712,115 |  | $ | 1,903,629 |  | 2001 |  | 12/21/01
|AIU  CHICAGO BUILDING(b)                                     |  | None         |  |              | 600,000   |                                             |   | 22,681,602                                    |      |   | 1,427,832                  |  |                        | 624,089   |                         |   | 19,614,678 |  |                                           | 4,470,667 |                      |   | 0             |  |   | 24,709,434 |  |   | 4,766,122 |  | 2003 |  | 9/19/03 
|                                                              |  |              |  |              |           |                                             |   |                                               |      |   |                            |  |                        |           |                         |   |            |  |                                           |           |                      |   |               |  |   |            |  |   |           |  |      |  |         
|Total                                                         |  |              |  | $            | 2,554,213 |                                             | $ | 33,897,223                                    |      | $ | 1,970,113                  |  | $                      | 2,671,824 |                         | $ | 31,279,058 |  | $                                         | 4,470,667 |                      | $ | 0             |  | $ | 38,421,549 |  | $ | 6,669,751 |  |      |  |         
|                                                              |  |              |  |              |           |                                             |   |                                               |      |   |                            |  |                        |           |                         |   |            |  |                                           |           |                      |   |               |  |   |            |  |   |           |  |      |  |         



| | (a) | 8560 Upland Drive is comprised of two connected one-story office and assembly buildings located in
Parker, Colorado.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | The AIU  Chicago Building is a four-story office building located in Hoffman Estates, Illinois.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (c) | Buildings, land improvements, building improvements, and tenant improvements are depreciated using
the straight-line method over 40 years, 20 years, 5 to 25 years, and the shorter of the economic life or corresponding lease terms, respectively.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (d) | Includes acquisition and advisory fees and acquisition expense reimbursements applied at acquisition.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Page F-33



---

SCHEDULE III  REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

AND AMORTIZATION

DECEMBER 31,
2006



|                             |  |      |             |   |                                        |   |            |    
|---------------------------- |  | ---- | ----------- | - | -------------------------------------- | - | ---------- | ---
|                             |  | Cost |             |   | Accumulated Depreciation &Amortization |  
|BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2003 |  | $    | 69,568,238  |   |                                        | $ | 3,459,689  |    
|                             |  |     
|Additions                    |  |      | 270,623     |   |                                        |   | 3,387,402  |    
|                             |  |      |             |   |                                        |   |            |    
|BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2004 |  |      | 69,838,861  |   |                                        |   | 6,847,091  |    
|                             |  |     
|Additions                    |  |      | 38,769      |   |                                        |   | 1,975,845  | (1)
|Dispositions                 |  |      | (31,520,687 | ) |                                        |   | (3,700,027 | )  
|                             |  |      |             |   |                                        |   |            |    
|BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2005 |  |      | 38,356,943  |   |                                        |   | 5,122,909  |    
|                             |  |     
|Additions                    |  |      | 217,650     |   |                                        |   | 1,699,886  |    
|Dispositions                 |  |      | (153,044    | ) |                                        |   | (153,044   | )  
|                             |  |      |             |   |                                        |   |            |    
|BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2006 |  | $    | 38,421,549  |   |                                        | $ | 6,669,751  |    
|                             |  |      |             |   |                                        |   |            |    



| | (1) | Included in the number presented is $3,554, which is included in lease termination expense in the
accompanying statements of operations.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Page F-34



---

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The General Partners of

Fund XIII and Fund XIV Associates:

We
have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Fund XIII and Fund XIV Associates (the Joint Venture) as of December 31, 2006, and the related statements of operations, partners capital, and cash flows for the year ended
December 31, 2006. Our audit also included the financial statement schedule listed in the index at Item 15(a). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Joint Ventures management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public
Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an
audit of the Joint Ventures internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not
for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Joint Ventures internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the
amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provide a reasonable
basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Fund
XIII and Fund XIV Associates as of December 31, 2006, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2006. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to
the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

/S/    FRAZIER & DEETER, LLC

Atlanta, Georgia

March 26, 2007



Page F-35



---

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The General Partners of

Fund XIII and Fund XIV Associates:

We
have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Fund XIII and Fund XIV Associates (the Joint Venture) as of December 31, 2005, and the related statements of operations, partners capital, and cash flows for each of the two years
in the period ended December 31, 2005. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule as of December 31, 2005 and for each of the two years in the period then ended listed in the index at Item 15(a). These financial
statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Joint Ventures management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Joint Ventures internal control over financial reporting. Our audits
included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Joint
Ventures internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Fund XIII and Fund XIV Associates at
December 31, 2005, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2005. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the
basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the information set forth therein.

/s/    ERNST & YOUNG LLP

Atlanta, Georgia

March 9, 2007



Page F-36



---

FUND XIII AND FUND XIV ASSOCIATES

BALANCE SHEETS

DECEMBER 31, 2006 AND 2005

ASSETS



|                                                                                                                                  |  |      |            |      |   |           
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ---------- | ---- | - | ----------
|                                                                                                                                  |  | 2006 |            | 2005
|Real estate assets, at cost:                                                                                                      |  |      |            |      |   |           
|Land                                                                                                                              |  | $    | 4,062,507  |      | $ | 4,062,507 
|Building and improvements, less accumulated depreciation of $1,438,887 and $1,011,991 at December 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively |  |      | 15,308,594 |      |   | 15,710,240
|Intangible lease assets, less accumulated amortization of $1,640,232 and $1,216,790 at December 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively   |  |      | 2,166,065  |      |   | 2,752,151 
|                                                                                                                                  |  |      |            |      |   |           
|Total real estate assets                                                                                                          |  |      | 21,537,166 |      |   | 22,524,898
|                                                                                                                                  |  |     
|Cash and cash equivalents                                                                                                         |  |      | 708,103    |      |   | 725,442   
|Tenant receivables                                                                                                                |  |      | 293,206    |      |   | 202,749   
|Deferred leasing costs, less accumulated amortization of $941,971 and $669,054 at December 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively        |  |      | 1,407,539  |      |   | 1,749,260 
|Other assets                                                                                                                      |  |      | 13,937     |      |   | 13,605    
|                                                                                                                                  |  |      |            |      |   |           
|Total assets                                                                                                                      |  | $    | 23,959,951 |      | $ | 25,215,954
|                                                                                                                                  |  |      |            |      |   |           

LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS CAPITAL



|                                                                                                                               |  |   |            |  |   |           
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ |  | - | ---------- |  | - | ----------
|Liabilities:                                                                                                                   |  |   |            |  |   |           
|Accounts payable and accrued expenses                                                                                          |  | $ | 71,580     |  | $ | 44,098    
|Due to affiliates                                                                                                              |  |   | 4,094      |  |   | 16,435    
|Deferred income                                                                                                                |  |   | 147,058    |  |   | 177,788   
|Partnership distributions payable                                                                                              |  |   | 554,283    |  |   | 503,211   
|Intangible lease liability, less accumulated amortization of $206,060 and $137,373 at December 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively |  |   | 480,806    |  |   | 549,493   
|                                                                                                                               |  |   |            |  |   |           
|Total liabilities                                                                                                              |  |   | 1,257,821  |  |   | 1,291,025 
|                                                                                                                               |  |  
|Partners capital:                                                                                                             |  |   |            |  |   |           
|Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P.                                                                                              |  |   | 10,738,108 |  |   | 11,316,491
|Wells Real Estate Fund XIV, L.P.                                                                                               |  |   | 11,964,022 |  |   | 12,608,438
|                                                                                                                               |  |   |            |  |   |           
|Total partners capital                                                                                                        |  |   | 22,702,130 |  |   | 23,924,929
|                                                                                                                               |  |   |            |  |   |           
|Total liabilities and partners capital                                                                                        |  | $ | 23,959,951 |  | $ | 25,215,954
|                                                                                                                               |  |   |            |  |   |           

See accompanying notes.



Page F-37



---

FUND XIII AND FUND XIV ASSOCIATES

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED

DECEMBER 31, 2006, 2005, AND 2004



|                            |  |      |           |      |   |           |  |   |          
|--------------------------- |  | ---- | --------- | ---- | - | --------- |  | - | ---------
|                            |  | 2006 |           | 2005 |   | 2004     
|REVENUES:                   |  |      |           |      |   |           |  |   |          
|Rental income               |  | $    | 2,500,730 |      | $ | 2,479,958 |  | $ | 2,353,598
|Tenant reimbursements       |  |      | 764,605   |      |   | 706,057   |  |   | 526,287  
|Interest and other income   |  |      | 27,589    |      |   | 2,161     |  |   | 330      
|                            |  |      |           |      |   |           |  |   |          
|Total revenues              |  |      | 3,292,924 |      |   | 3,188,176 |  |   | 2,880,215
|                            |  |      |          
|EXPENSES:                   |  |      |           |      |   |           |  |   |          
|Property operating costs    |  |      | 669,428   |      |   | 666,422   |  |   | 471,690  
|Management and leasing fees |  |      | 140,875   |      |   | 145,142   |  |   | 138,069  
|Depreciation                |  |      | 426,896   |      |   | 421,051   |  |   | 504,923  
|Amortization                |  |      | 888,039   |      |   | 878,115   |  |   | 840,014  
|General and administrative  |  |      | 103,188   |      |   | 109,158   |  |   | 106,346  
|                            |  |      |           |      |   |           |  |   |          
|Total expenses              |  |      | 2,228,426 |      |   | 2,219,888 |  |   | 2,061,042
|                            |  |      |           |      |   |           |  |   |          
|NET INCOME                  |  | $    | 1,064,498 |      | $ | 968,288   |  | $ | 819,173  
|                            |  |      |           |      |   |           |  |   |          

See accompanying notes.



Page F-38



---

FUND XIII AND FUND XIV ASSOCIATES

STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS CAPITAL

FOR THE YEARS ENDED

DECEMBER 31,
2006, 2005, AND 2004



|                           |  |                                   |            |   |                                  |   |            |                         |  |   |            |  
|-------------------------- |  | --------------------------------- | ---------- | - | -------------------------------- | - | ---------- | ----------------------- |  | - | ---------- | -
|                           |  | Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P. |            |   | Wells Real Estate Fund XIV, L.P. |   |            | Total Partners Capital | 
|Balance, December 31, 2003 |  | $                                 | 9,419,352  |   |                                  | $ | 9,419,352  |                         |  | $ | 18,838,704 |  
|                           |  |                                   |           
|Net income                 |  |                                   | 391,283    |   |                                  |   | 427,890    |                         |  |   | 819,173    |  
|Partnership contributions  |  |                                   | 2,954,663  |   |                                  |   | 4,379,199  |                         |  |   | 7,333,862  |  
|Partnership distributions  |  |                                   | (960,809   | ) |                                  |   | (1,048,241 | )                       |  |   | (2,009,050 | )
|                           |  |                                   |            |   |                                  |   |            |                         |  |   |            |  
|Balance, December 31, 2004 |  |                                   | 11,804,489 |   |                                  |   | 13,178,200 |                         |  |   | 24,982,689 |  
|                           |  |                                   |           
|Net income                 |  |                                   | 458,000    |   |                                  |   | 510,288    |                         |  |   | 968,288    |  
|Partnership distributions  |  |                                   | (945,998   | ) |                                  |   | (1,080,050 | )                       |  |   | (2,026,048 | )
|                           |  |                                   |            |   |                                  |   |            |                         |  |   |            |  
|Balance, December 31, 2005 |  |                                   | 11,316,491 |   |                                  |   | 12,608,438 |                         |  |   | 23,924,929 |  
|                           |  |                                   |           
|Net income                 |  |                                   | 503,508    |   |                                  |   | 560,990    |                         |  |   | 1,064,498  |  
|Partnership contributions  |  |                                   | 12,497     |   |                                  |   | 13,923     |                         |  |   | 26,420     |  
|Partnership distributions  |  |                                   | (1,094,388 | ) |                                  |   | (1,219,329 | )                       |  |   | (2,313,717 | )
|                           |  |                                   |            |   |                                  |   |            |                         |  |   |            |  
|Balance, December 31, 2006 |  | $                                 | 10,738,108 |   |                                  | $ | 11,964,022 |                         |  | $ | 22,702,130 |  
|                           |  |                                   |            |   |                                  |   |            |                         |  |   |            |  

See accompanying notes.



Page F-39



---

FUND XIII AND FUND XIV ASSOCIATES

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED

DECEMBER 31, 2006, 2005, AND 2004



|                                                                                  |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |            |  
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | ---- | ---------- | - | ---- | - | ---------- | ---- |  | - | ---------- | -
|                                                                                  |  | 2006 |            |   | 2005 |   |            | 2004 | 
|CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:                                             |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |            |  
|Net income                                                                        |  | $    | 1,064,498  |   |      | $ | 968,288    |      |  | $ | 819,173    |  
|Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |            |  
|Depreciation                                                                      |  |      | 426,896    |   |      |   | 421,051    |      |  |   | 504,923    |  
|Amortization                                                                      |  |      | 859,120    |   |      |   | 849,801    |      |  |   | 808,986    |  
|Changes in assets and liabilities:                                                |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |            |  
|Increase in tenant receivables                                                    |  |      | (90,457    | ) |      |   | (69,007    | )    |  |   | (96,288    | )
|Increase in other assets                                                          |  |      | (332       | ) |      |   | (2,370     | )    |  |   | (10,198    | )
|Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued expenses                      |  |      | 27,482     |   |      |   | (18,248    | )    |  |   | 41,186     |  
|(Decrease) increase in due to affiliates                                          |  |      | (12,341    | ) |      |   | 4,636      |      |  |   | 7,373      |  
|(Decrease) increase in deferred income                                            |  |      | (30,730    | ) |      |   | 52,796     |      |  |   | 124,992    |  
|                                                                                  |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |            |  
|Net cash provided by operating activities                                         |  |      | 2,244,136  |   |      |   | 2,206,947  |      |  |   | 2,200,147  |  
|                                                                                  |  |      |           
|CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:                                             |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |            |  
|Investment in real estate assets                                                  |  |      | (25,250    | ) |      |   | (108,008   | )    |  |   | (7,351,527 | )
|Payment of deferred leasing costs                                                 |  |      | 0          |   |      |   | (26,522    | )    |  |   | 0          |  
|                                                                                  |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |            |  
|Net cash used in investing activities                                             |  |      | (25,250    | ) |      |   | (134,530   | )    |  |   | (7,351,527 | )
|                                                                                  |  |      |           
|CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:                                             |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |            |  
|Distributions to joint venture partners in excess of accumulated earnings         |  |      | (2,262,645 | ) |      |   | (2,100,785 | )    |  |   | (772,495   | )
|Distributions to joint venture partners from accumulated earnings                 |  |      | 0          |   |      |   | 0          |      |  |   | (855,583   | )
|Contributions from joint venture partners                                         |  |      | 26,420     |   |      |   | 0          |      |  |   | 7,333,862  |  
|                                                                                  |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |            |  
|Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities                               |  |      | (2,236,225 | ) |      |   | (2,100,785 | )    |  |   | 5,705,784  |  
|                                                                                  |  |      |           
|NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS                              |  |      | (17,339    | ) |      |   | (28,368    | )    |  |   | 554,404    |  
|                                                                                  |  |      |           
|CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period                                    |  |      | 725,442    |   |      |   | 753,810    |      |  |   | 199,406    |  
|                                                                                  |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |            |  
|CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period                                          |  | $    | 708,103    |   |      | $ | 725,442    |      |  | $ | 753,810    |  
|                                                                                  |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |            |  
|                                                                                  |  |      |           
|SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:            |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |            |  
|Deferred project costs applied to the joint venture                               |  | $    | 557        |   |      | $ | 0          |      |  | $ | 292,620    |  
|                                                                                  |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |            |  
|Partnership distributions payable                                                 |  | $    | 554,283    |   |      | $ | 503,211    |      |  | $ | 577,948    |  
|                                                                                  |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |            |  
|Write-off of fully amortized real estate assets                                   |  | $    | 162,644    |   |      | $ | 0          |      |  | $ | 0          |  
|                                                                                  |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |            |  
|Write-off of fully amortized deferred leasing costs                               |  | $    | 68,804     |   |      | $ | 0          |      |  | $ | 0          |  
|                                                                                  |  |      |            |   |      |   |            |      |  |   |            |  

See accompanying notes.



Page F-40



---

FUND XIII AND FUND XIV ASSOCIATES

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004



|1. | ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS
|-- | -------------------------

On August 20, 2003, Wells Real
Estate Fund XIII, L.P. (Fund XIII) and Wells Real Estate Fund XIV, L.P. (Fund XIV) entered into a Georgia general partnership to form Fund XIII and Fund XIV Associates (the Joint Venture). The general partners of
Fund XIII and Fund XIV are Leo F. Wells, III and Wells Capital, Inc. (Wells Capital).

The Joint Venture was formed to acquire and operate
commercial real properties, including properties to be developed, currently under development or construction, newly constructed or having operating histories. On October 30, 2003, the Joint Venture purchased two single-story office buildings
containing approximately 82,000-square-feet, the Siemens-Orlando Building, located in Orlando, Florida. On December 19, 2003, the Joint Venture acquired the Randstad  Atlanta Building, a four-story office building containing approximately
65,000 aggregate rentable square feet located in Atlanta, Georgia. On March 26, 2004, the Joint Venture purchased an approximate 120,000-square-foot, one story office and warehouse building, 7500 Setzler Parkway, located in Brooklyn Park,
Minnesota. Ownership interests were recomputed based on relative cumulative capital contributions from the joint venture partners.



|2. | SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|-- | ------------------------------------------

Basis of
Presentation

The Joint Ventures financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP).

Use of Estimates

The preparation
of the Joint Ventures financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses and related disclosures of contingent
assets and liabilities in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Revenue Recognition

The Joint Ventures leases typically include renewal options, escalation provisions and provisions requiring tenants to reimburse the Joint
Venture for a pro-rata share of operating costs incurred. All of the Joint Ventures leases are classified as operating leases, and the related rental income, including scheduled rental rate increases (other than scheduled increases based on
the Consumer Price Index) is recognized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the respective leases. Rents and tenant reimbursements collected in advance are recorded as deferred income in the accompanying balance sheets.

Lease termination income is recognized when the tenant loses the right to lease the space and the Joint Venture has satisfied all obligations under the related lease or
lease termination agreement.

The Joint Venture records the sale of real estate assets pursuant to the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 66, Accounting for Sales of Real Estate. Accordingly, gains are recognized upon completing the sale and, among other things, determining the sale price and transferring all of the risks and rewards of
ownership without significant continuing involvement with the seller. Recognition of all or a portion of the gain would be deferred until both of these conditions are met. Losses are recognized in full as of the sale date.



Page F-41



---

Real Estate Assets

Real estate assets are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Amounts capitalized to real estate assets consist of the cost of acquisition or construction, and any tenant improvements or major improvements and betterments which
extend the useful life of the related asset. We consider the period of future benefit of the asset to determine the appropriate useful lives. These assessments have a direct impact on net income. Upon receiving notification of a tenants
intention to terminate a lease, undepreciated tenant improvements are written off to lease termination expense. All repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred.

The estimated useful lives of the Joint Ventures real estate assets by class are provided below:



|                        |  |                                       
|----------------------- |  | --------------------------------------
|Buildings               |  | 40 years                              
|Building improvements   |  | 5-25 years                            
|Land improvements       |  | 20 years                              
|Tenant Improvements     |  | Shorter of lease term or economic life
|Intangible lease assets |  | Lease term                            

Management continually monitors events and changes in circumstances that could indicate that the carrying amounts
of the real estate assets and related intangible assets owned by the Joint Venture may not be recoverable. When indicators of potential impairment are present management assesses whether the respective carrying values will be recovered with the
undiscounted future operating cash flows expected from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition for assets held for use, or with the estimated fair values, less costs to sell, for assets held for sale. In the event that the expected
undiscounted future cash flows for assets held for use or the estimated fair value, less costs to sell, for assets held for sale do not exceed the respective asset carrying value, management adjusts such assets to the respective estimated fair
values, as defined by SFAS No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, and recognizes an impairment loss. Estimated fair values are calculated based on the following information, dependent upon availability,
in order of preference: (i) recently quoted market prices, (ii) market prices for comparable properties, or (iii) the present value of undiscounted cash flows, including estimated salvage value. The Joint Venture has determined that
there has been no impairment in the carrying value of any of the real estate assets held as of December 31, 2006.

In the third quarter of 2004, the
Joint Venture completed a review of its real estate depreciation by performing an analysis of the components of each property type in an effort to determine weighted-average composite useful lives of its real estate assets. As a result of this
review, the Joint Venture changed its estimate of the weighted-average composite useful lives for all building assets. Effective July 1, 2004, for all building assets, the Joint Venture extended the weighted-average composite useful life from
25 years to 40 years. The change resulted in an increase to net income of approximately $126,306 for the year ended December 31, 2004. We believe the change more appropriately reflects the estimated useful lives of the building assets and is
consistent with prevailing industry practice. We believe the change more appropriately reflects the estimated useful lives of the building assets and is consistent with prevailing industry practice.

Intangible Lease Assets and Liabilities

Upon the acquisition of real
properties, it is the Joint Ventures policy to allocate the purchase price of properties to acquired tangible assets, consisting of land and building, and identified intangible assets and liabilities, consisting of the value of above-market
and below-market leases, and the value of in-place leases, based in each case on their estimated fair values.

The fair values of the tangible assets of an
acquired property (which includes land and building) are determined by valuing the property as if it were vacant, and the as-if-vacant value is then allocated to land and building based on managements determination of the relative
fair value of these assets. Management determines the as-if vacant fair value of a property using methods similar to those used by independent appraisers. Factors considered by management in performing these analyses include an estimate of carrying
costs during the expected lease-up



Page F-42



---

periods considering current market conditions and costs to execute similar leases. In estimating carrying costs, management includes real estate taxes,
insurance, and other operating expenses during the expected lease-up periods based on current market demand. Management estimates costs to execute similar leases including leasing commissions, and other related costs.

The fair values of above-market and below-market in-place leases are recorded based on the present value (using an interest rate which reflects the risks associated with
the leases acquired) of the difference between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases and (ii) managements estimate of market rates for the corresponding in-place leases, measured over a period equal
to the remaining terms of the leases. The capitalized above-market and below-market lease values are recorded as intangible lease assets or liabilities and amortized as an adjustment to rental income over the remaining terms of the respective
leases.

The fair values of in-place leases include direct costs associated with obtaining a new tenant, opportunity costs associated with lost rentals
which are avoided by acquiring an in-place lease, and tenant relationships. Direct costs associated with obtaining a new tenant include commissions, tenant improvements and other direct costs and are estimated based on managements
consideration of current market costs to execute a similar lease. These direct costs are included in deferred leasing costs in the accompanying balance sheets and are amortized to expense over the remaining terms of the respective leases. The value
of opportunity costs is calculated using the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases over a market absorption period for a similar lease. Customer relationships are valued based on expected renewal of a lease or the likelihood
of obtaining a particular tenant for other locations. The value of absorption period costs and tenant relationships are included in intangible lease assets in the accompanying balance sheets and are amortized to expense over the remaining terms of
the respective leases.

The gross values of above-market in-place leases were approximately $198,000 as of December 31, 2006 and $220,000 as of
December 31, 2005 and the gross values of intangible absorption period costs were approximately $3,609,000 as of December 31, 2006 and $3,749,000 as of December 31, 2005, both of which are recorded as intangible lease assets. The
gross values of intangible lease origination costs were approximately $2,350,000 and $2,392,000, respectively, as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 and are included in deferred leasing costs. The gross values of below-market in-place leases were
approximately $687,000 as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 and are recorded as an intangible lease liability.

The Joint Venture recorded amortization of
above-market and below-market in-place leases of approximately $29,000, $28,000, and $31,000 during the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively, which was recorded as an adjustment to rental revenues. The Joint Venture
recorded amortization of intangible lease origination costs and intangible absorption costs of approximately $867,000, $872,000, and $840,000 during the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively, which was recorded as
amortization expense in the accompanying statements of operations.

The remaining net unamortized balance for intangible assets and liability will be
amortized as follows:



|                                     |  |                         |           |                                        |   |                                    |  |   |         |  |   |          
|------------------------------------ |  | ----------------------- | --------- | -------------------------------------- | - | ---------------------------------- |  | - | ------- |  | - | ---------
|                                     |  | Intangible Lease Assets |           | Intangible Below-MarketLease Liability |   | Intangible Lease Origination Costs
|                                     |  | AbsorptionPeriod Costs  |           | Above-Market In-Place Lease Assets     |   |                                   
|For the year ending December 31:     |  |                         |           |                                        |   |                                    |  |   |         |  |   |          
|2007                                 |  | $                       | 500,348   |                                        | $ | 32,262                             |  | $ | 68,687  |  | $ | 306,749  
|2008                                 |  |                         | 453,624   |                                        |   | 22,648                             |  |   | 68,687  |  |   | 287,921  
|2009                                 |  |                         | 403,047   |                                        |   | 20,510                             |  |   | 68,687  |  |   | 258,911  
|2010                                 |  |                         | 251,317   |                                        |   | 14,098                             |  |   | 68,687  |  |   | 171,883  
|2011                                 |  |                         | 161,808   |                                        |   | 3,249                              |  |   | 68,687  |  |   | 132,317  
|Thereafter                           |  |                         | 298,824   |                                        |   | 4,330                              |  |   | 137,371 |  |   | 249,758  
|                                     |  |                         |           |                                        |   |                                    |  |   |         |  |   |          
|                                     |  | $                       | 2,068,968 |                                        | $ | 97,097                             |  | $ | 480,806 |  | $ | 1,407,539
|                                     |  |                         |           |                                        |   |                                    |  |   |         |  |   |          
|                                     |  |                         |           |                                       
|Weighted-Average Amortization Period |  |                         | 6 years   |                                        |   | 5 years                            |  |   | 7 years |  |   | 6 years  



Page F-43



---

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Joint Venture considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents include cash and short-term investments. Short-term investments are stated at
cost, which approximates fair value, and consist of investments in money market accounts.

Tenant Receivables

Tenant receivables are comprised of tenant receivables and straight-line rent receivables. Management assesses the collectibility of tenant receivables on an ongoing
basis and provides for allowances as such balances, or portions thereof, become uncollectible. Upon receiving notification of a tenants intention to terminate a lease, unamortized straight-line rent receivables are written off to lease
termination expense. No such allowances have been recorded as of December 31, 2006 or 2005.

Deferred Leasing Costs, net

Deferred leasing costs reflect costs incurred to procure operating leases, including opportunity costs avoided by acquiring an in-place lease identified in connection
with the purchase price allocation process, which are capitalized and amortized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the respective leases. Upon receiving notification of a tenants intention to terminate a lease, unamortized deferred
leasing costs are written-off to lease termination expense.

Other Assets

Other assets as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 are comprised of the following items:



|                    |  |      |        |      |   |       
|------------------- |  | ---- | ------ | ---- | - | ------
|                    |  | 2006 |        | 2005
|Prepaid expenses    |  | $    | 6,052  |      | $ | 6,994 
|Utility deposits    |  |      | 5,943  |      |   | 6,611 
|Interest receivable |  |      | 1,942  |      |   | 0     
|                    |  |      |        |      |   |       
|Total               |  | $    | 13,937 |      | $ | 13,605
|                    |  |      |        |      |   |       

Prepaid expenses are recognized as the related services are provided. Utility deposits represent cash deposits
paid to utility companies. Interest receivable represents interest earned during the period presented, which will be received in the following month. Balances without a future economic benefit are written off as they are identified.

Allocation of Income and Distributions

Pursuant to the terms of the
joint venture agreement, income and distributions are allocated to the joint venture partners based upon their respective ownership interests as determined by relative cumulative capital contributions, as defined. For the periods presented, Fund
XIII and Fund XIV held ownership interests in the Joint Venture of approximately 47% and 53%, respectively. Net cash from operations is generally distributed to the joint venture partners on a quarterly basis.

Income Taxes

The Joint Venture is not subject to federal or state
income taxes; therefore, none have been provided for in the accompanying financial statements. The partners of Fund XIII and Fund XIV are required to include their respective share of profits and losses from the Joint Venture in their
individual income tax returns.

Reclassifications

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.



Page F-44



---

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and
expands disclosures required for fair value measurements under GAAP, including amending SFAS No. 144. SFAS No. 157 emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement, as opposed to an entity-specific measurement. SFAS No. 157 will be
effective for the Joint Venture beginning January 1, 2008. The Joint Venture is currently assessing provisions and evaluating the financial impact of SFAS No. 157 on its financial statements, however, does not believe the adoption of this
pronouncement will have a material impact on its financial statements.

In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued Staff Accounting
Bulletin (SAB) No. 108, Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements, which provides interpretive guidance on the consideration of the effects of
prior year misstatements in quantifying current year misstatements for the purpose of a materiality assessment. SAB No. 108 is effective for fiscal years ending after November 15, 2006, and is effective for the Joint Venture for the year
ended December 31, 2006. The adoption of this pronouncement has not had a material impact on the Joint Ventures financial statements.

In July
2006, the FASB issued Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation (FIN) No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, which clarifies the relevant criteria and
approach for the recognition, derecognition, and measurement of uncertain tax positions. FIN No. 48 will be effective for the Joint Venture beginning January 1, 2007. The Joint Venture is currently assessing provisions and evaluating the
financial impact of FIN No. 48 on its financial statements, however, does not believe the adoption of this pronouncement will have a material impact on its financial statements.

In June 2005, the FASB issued SFAS No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections, which replaces Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 20, Accounting Changes, and SFAS No. 3,
Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim Financial Statements. SFAS No. 154 changes the method to account for and report changes in accounting principles and corrections of errors. Previously, most voluntary changes in accounting
principles required recognition as a cumulative effect adjustment to net income during the period in which the change was adopted. Conversely, in circumstances where applicable accounting guidance does not include specific transition provisions,
SFAS No. 154 requires retrospective application to prior periods financial statements unless it is impractical to determine either the period-specific effects or the cumulative effect of the change. SFAS No. 154 is effective for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005; however, it does not change the transition provisions of any of the existing accounting pronouncements. The adoption of this pronouncement has not had a material impact on the Joint Ventures
financial statements.



|3. | RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS
|-- | --------------------------

Management and Leasing Fees

Fund XIII and Fund XIV entered into a property management and leasing agreement with Wells Management Company, Inc. (Wells
Management), an affiliate of their general partners. In accordance with the property management and leasing agreement, Wells Management receives compensation for the management and leasing of the Joint Ventures properties, the Joint
Venture will pay Wells Management management and leasing fees equal to the lesser of (a) fees that would be paid to a comparable outside firm, which is assessed periodically based on market studies, or (b) 4.5% of the gross revenues
generally paid over the life of the lease, plus a separate competitive fee for the one-time initial lease-up of newly constructed properties generally paid in conjunction with the receipt of the first months rent. In the case of commercial
properties which are leased on a long-term net basis (ten or more years), the maximum property management fee from such leases shall be 1% of the gross revenues generally paid over the life of the leases except for a one-time initial leasing fee of
3% of the gross revenues on each lease payable over the first five full years of the original lease term. The Joint Venture incurred management and leasing fees that are payable to Wells Management and its affiliates of $93,498, $109,850, and
$125,668 for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005, and 2004, respectively.



Page F-45



---

Administration Reimbursements

Wells Management and its affiliates perform certain administrative services for the Joint Venture, relating to accounting, property management, and other joint venture administration, and incur the related expenses. Such expenses are
allocated among these entities based on time spent on each entity by individual personnel. In the opinion of management, this is a reasonable estimation of such expense. During 2006, 2005, and 2004, the Joint Venture reimbursed $33,246, $55,873, and
$50,031, respectively, to Wells Management and its affiliates for these services.

Deferred Project Costs

Fund XIII and Fund XIV paid 3.5% of gross capital contributions to Wells Capital for acquisition and advisory services, subject to certain overall limitations provided in
the respective partnership agreements. These fees were capitalized by Fund XIII and Fund XIV as paid and allocated to specific properties upon acquisition by the Joint Venture or certain capital improvements thereafter. Accordingly, such deferred
project costs are included in the capitalized assets of the Joint Venture.

Due to Affiliates

As of December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, due to affiliates balances reflect amounts due to Wells Management and/or Wells Capital for the following items:



|                              |  |      |       |      |   |       
|----------------------------- |  | ---- | ----- | ---- | - | ------
|                              |  | 2006 |       | 2005
|Property management fees      |  | $    | 3,856 |      | $ | 6,216 
|Administrative reimbursements |  |      | 238   |      |   | 10,219
|                              |  |      |       |      |   |       
|                              |  | $    | 4,094 |      | $ | 16,435
|                              |  |      |       |      |   |       



|4. | RENTAL INCOME
|-- | -------------

The future minimum rental income due to the Joint
Venture under non-cancelable operating leases as of December 31, 2006 is as follows:



|                        |  |   |           
|----------------------- |  | - | ----------
|Year ended December 31: |  |   |           
|2007                    |  | $ | 2,334,841 
|2008                    |  |   | 2,219,377 
|2009                    |  |   | 2,056,070 
|2010                    |  |   | 1,485,644 
|2011                    |  |   | 1,532,243 
|Thereafter              |  |   | 1,701,795 
|                        |  |   |           
|                        |  | $ | 11,329,970
|                        |  |   |           

Three tenants generated approximately 30%, 26%, and 25% of rental income for the year ended December 31,
2006, and four tenants will generate approximately 42%, 27%, 19%, and 12% of future minimum rental income.



|5. | SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
|-- | -----------------

Property Sale

On January 31, 2007, the Joint Venture sold 7500 Setzler Parkway to an unrelated third party for a gross sales price of $8,950,000. As a result of the sale, the
Joint Venture received net sale proceeds of approximately $8,723,000 and recognized a gain of approximately $2,166,000, which may be adjusted as additional information becomes available in subsequent periods. As of December 31, 2006, the
carrying value of 7500 Setzler Parkway was approximately $6,578,000.



Page F-46



---

Purchase and Sale Agreement

On March 19, 2007, the Joint Venture entered into a purchase and sale agreement to sell the Randstad  Atlanta Building to an unrelated third party. The completion of this transaction is currently subject to, among other things, a
due diligence period expiring on April 2, 2007. Accordingly, there are no assurances that this sale will be completed. If the transaction progresses, the Joint Venture believes the closing of this transaction is likely to occur during the
second quarter of 2007.



Page F-47



---

SCHEDULE III  REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

AND AMORTIZATION

DECEMBER 31, 2006



|                                 |  |              |      |              |                            |                                              |   |                                             |  |                                           |           |                       |   |               |  |   |            |  |   |           |  |   |            |  |   |           |  |      |  |           
|-------------------------------- |  | ------------ | ---- | ------------ | -------------------------- | -------------------------------------------- | - | ------------------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------------- | --------- | --------------------- | - | ------------- |  | - | ---------- |  | - | --------- |  | - | ---------- |  | - | --------- |  | ---- |  | ----------
|                                 |  | Encumbrances |      | Initial Cost |                            | CostsCapitalizedSubsequent To Acquisition(e) |   | Gross Carrying Amounts of December 31, 2006 |  | Accumulated Depreciation &Amortization(d) |           | Date of Construction  |   | Date Acquired
|Description                      |  |              | Land |              | Buildings and Improvements |                                              |   | Land                                        |  | Buildings and Improvements                |           | IntangibleLease Asset |   | Total         |  |   |           
|SIEMENS  ORLANDO BUILDING(a)    |  | None         |      | $            | 1,950,000                  |                                              | $ | 8,734,436                                   |  | $                                         | 325,236   |                       | $ | 2,031,250     |  | $ | 7,095,759  |  | $ | 1,882,663 |  | $ | 11,009,672 |  | $ | 1,641,655 |  | 2003 |  | 10/30/2003
|                                 |  |              |      |              |                            |                                              |   |                                             |  |                                           |          
|RANDSTAD  ATLANTA BUILDING(b)   |  | None         |      |              | 600,000                    |                                              |   | 4,829,953                                   |  |                                           | 1,109,871 |                       |   | 625,000       |  |   | 4,668,603  |  |   | 1,246,221 |  |   | 6,539,824  |  |   | 785,164   |  | 2003 |  | 12/19/2003
|                                 |  |              |      |              |                            |                                              |   |                                             |  |                                           |          
|7500 SETZLER PARKWAY BUILDING(c) |  | None         |      |              | 1,350,000                  |                                              |   | 5,423,401                                   |  |                                           | 293,388   |                       |   | 1,406,257     |  |   | 4,983,119  |  |   | 677,413   |  |   | 7,066,789  |  |   | 652,300   |  | 2004 |  | 03/26/2004
|                                 |  |              |      |              |                            |                                              |   |                                             |  |                                           |           |                       |   |               |  |   |            |  |   |           |  |   |            |  |   |           |  |      |  |           
|Total                            |  |              |      | $            | 3,900,000                  |                                              | $ | 18,987,790                                  |  | $                                         | 1,728,495 |                       | $ | 4,062,507     |  | $ | 16,747,481 |  | $ | 3,806,297 |  | $ | 24,616,285 |  | $ | 3,079,119 |  |      |  |           
|                                 |  |              |      |              |                            |                                              |   |                                             |  |                                           |           |                       |   |               |  |   |            |  |   |           |  |   |            |  |   |           |  |      |  |           



| | (a) | The Siemens  Orlando Building consists of two single-story office buildings located in Orlando,
Florida.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (b) | The Randstad  Atlanta Building is a four-story office building located in Atlanta, Georgia.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (c) | 7500 Setzler Parkway is a one-story office and warehouse located in Brooklyn Park, Minnesota.
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (d) | Buildings, land improvements, building improvements, and tenant improvements are depreciated using
the straight-line method over 40 years, 20 years, 5 to 25 years, and the shorter of the economic life or corresponding lease terms, respectively.
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (e) | Includes acquisition and advisory fees and acquisition expense reimbursements applied at acquisition.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Page F-48



---

SCHEDULE III  REAL ESTATE AND ACCUMULATED DEPRECIATION

AND AMORTIZATION

DECEMBER 31,
2006



|                             |  |      |            |   |                                         |   |           |  
|---------------------------- |  | ---- | ---------- | - | --------------------------------------- | - | --------- | -
|                             |  | Cost |            |   | Accumulated Depreciation & Amortization |  
|BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2003 |  | $    | 17,561,218 |   |                                         | $ | 146,934   |  
|                             |  |     
|Additions                    |  |      | 7,084,453  |   |                                         |   | 1,070,314 |  
|                             |  |      |            |   |                                         |   |           |  
|BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2004 |  |      | 24,645,671 |   |                                         |   | 1,217,248 |  
|                             |  |     
|Additions                    |  |      | 108,008    |   |                                         |   | 1,011,533 |  
|                             |  |      |            |   |                                         |   |           |  
|BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2005 |  |      | 24,753,679 |   |                                         |   | 2,228,781 |  
|                             |  |     
|Additions                    |  |      | 25,250     |   |                                         |   | 1,012,982 |  
|Dispositions                 |  |      | (162,644   | ) |                                         |   | (162,644  | )
|                             |  |      |            |   |                                         |   |           |  
|BALANCE AT DECEMBER 31, 2006 |  | $    | 24,616,285 |   |                                         | $ | 3,079,119 |  
|                             |  |      |            |   |                                         |   |           |  



Page F-49



---

EXHIBIT INDEX

TO

2006 FORM 10-K

OF

WELLS REAL ESTATE FUND XIII, L.P.

The following documents are filed as exhibits to this report. Those exhibits previously filed and incorporated herein by reference are identified below by an asterisk.
For each such asterisked exhibit, there is shown below the description of the previous filing. Exhibits which are not required for this report are omitted.



|              |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            
|------------- |  | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|ExhibitNumber |  | Description of Document                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
|              | 
|*3.1          |  | Agreement of Limited Partnership of Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P. (Exhibit 3.1 to Form S-11 Registration Statement of Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P., as amended to date, Commission
File No. 333-48984)                                                            
|              | 
|*3.2          |  | Certificate of Limited Partnership of Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P. dated September 15, 1998 (Exhibit 3.2 to Form S-11 Registration Statement of Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P., as
amended to date, Commission File No. 333-48984)                                 
|              | 
|*3.3          |  | Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Limited Partnership of Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P. dated October 20, 2000 (Exhibit 3.2(a) to Form S-11 Registration Statement of Wells
Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P., as amended to date, Commission File No. 333-48984)
|              | 
|*10.1         |  | Management and Leasing Agreement with Wells Management Company, Inc. (Exhibit 10.2 to Form S-11 Registration Statement of Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P., as amended to date, Commission
File No. 333-48984)                                                            
|              | 
|*10.2         |  | Joint Venture Partnership Agreement of Wells Fund XIII-REIT Joint Venture Partnership (Exhibit 10.85 to Form S-11 Registration Statement of Wells Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., as
amended to date, Commission File No. 333-44900)                                   
|              | 
|*10.3         |  | Agreement for the Purchase and Sale of Property for the AmeriCredit Building (Exhibit 10.86 to Form S-11 Registration Statement of Wells Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., Commission File
No. 333-44900)                                                                
|              | 
|*10.4         |  | Lease Agreement for the AmeriCredit Building (Exhibit 10.87 to Form S-11 Registration Statement of Wells Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc., as amended to date, Commission File No.
333-44900)                                                                            
|              | 
|*10.5         |  | Purchase Agreement for the ADIC Buildings (Exhibit 10.6 to Form S-11 Registration Statement of Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P., as amended to date, Commission File No.
333-48984)                                                                                       
|              | 
|*10.6         |  | Purchase Agreement for the land immediately adjacent to the ADIC Buildings (Exhibit 10.7 to Form S-11 Registration Statement of Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P., as amended to date,
Commission File No. 333-48984)                                                      
|              | 
|*10.7         |  | Lease Agreement for the ADIC Buildings (Exhibit 10.8 to Form S-11 Registration Statement of Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P., as amended to date, Commission File No.
333-48984)                                                                                          
|              | 
|*10.8         |  | Purchase Agreement for the John Wiley Indianapolis Building (Exhibit 10.9 to Form S-11 Registration Statement of Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P., as amended to date, Commission File No.
333-48984)                                                                     
|              | 
|*10.9         |  | Lease Agreement with John Wiley & Sons, Inc. ((Exhibit 10.10 to Form S-11 Registration Statement of Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P., as amended to date, Commission File No.
333-48984)                                                                                  
|              | 
|*10.10        |  | Amendment #2 to Lease Agreement with John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (Exhibit 10.11 to Form S-11 Registration Statement of Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P., as amended to date, Commission File
No. 333-48984)                                                                   



---

|              |  |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                
|------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|ExhibitNumber |  | Description of Document                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
|              | 
|*10.11        |  | Amendment #3 to Lease Agreement with John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (Exhibit 10.12 to Form S-11 Registration Statement of Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P., as amended to date, Commission File
No. 333-48984)                                       
|              | 
|*10.12        |  | Purchase and Sale Agreement relating to the AIU Chicago Building (Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 10-Q of Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P. for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, File No.
0-49633)                                               
|              | 
|*10.13        |  | Lease Agreement with American InterContinental University, Inc. (Exhibit 10.2 to the Form 10-Q of Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P. for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, File No.
0-49633)                                                
|              | 
|*10.14        |  | Agreement of Purchase and Sale of Property for Siemens Orlando Buildings and third amendment thereto (Exhibit 10.3 to Form S-11 Registration Statement of Wells Real Estate Fund XIV, L.P., as
amended to date, Commission File No. 333-101463)
|              | 
|*10.15        |  | Lease Agreement with Siemens Shared Services LLC (Exhibit 10.4 to Form S-11 Registration Statement of Wells Real Estate Fund XIV, L.P., as amended to date, Commission File No.
333-101463)                                                    
|              | 
|*10.16        |  | Joint Venture Partnership Agreement of Fund XIII and Fund XIV Associates (Exhibit 10.16 to Form 10-K of Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003,
Commission File No. 0-49633)                            
|              | 
|*10.17        |  | Purchase and Sale Agreement for the sale of the Randstad Atlanta Building (Exhibit 10.17 to Form 10-K of Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003,
Commission File No. 0-49633)                           
|              | 
|*10.18        |  | Lease Agreement for Randstad Atlanta Building (Exhibit 10.18 to Form 10-K of Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P. for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, Commission File No.
0-49633)                                                       
|              | 
|*10.19        |  | Purchase and Sale Agreement for the sale of 7500 Setzler Parkway Building (Exhibit 10.8 to Form S-11 Registration Statement of Wells Real Estate Fund XIV, L.P., as amended to date, Commission
File No. 333-101463)                           
|              | 
|*10.20        |  | Lease Agreement for 7500 Setzler Parkway Building (Exhibit 10.9 to Form S-11 Registration Statement of Wells Real Estate Fund XIV, L.P., as amended to date, Commission File No.
333-101463)                                                   
|              | 
|*10.21        |  | Purchase and Sale Agreement for the AmeriCredit Building and John Wiley Building (Exhibit 10.70 to the Form 10-Q of Wells Real Estate Investment Trust, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31,
2005, Commission File No. 0-25739)                
|              | 
|10.22         |  | Purchase and Sale Agreement by and among Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P., Wells Real Estate Fund XIV, L.P. and AMB Institutional Alliance Fund III, L.P. for the 7500 Setzler Parkway
Building                                               
|              | 
|*16           |  | Letter from Ernst & Young LLP dated September 27, 2006 regarding change in accountants (Exhibit 16.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K of Wells Real Estate Fund XIII, L.P. filed on
September 27, 2006, Commission File No. 0-49633)          
|              | 
|31.1          |  | Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002                                                                                                                                         
|              | 
|31.2          |  | Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002                                                                                                                                         
|              | 
|32.1          |  | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002