alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2016048EN.01008601.xml

| 8.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 48/86 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 48/86

---

Action brought on 29 November 2015 — Marcas Costa Brava v OHIM — Excellent Brands JMI (Cremcaffé by Julius Meinl)

(Case T-691/15)

(2016/C 048/94)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Marcas Costa Brava, SL (Sils, Spain) (represented by: E. Manresa Medina and J. Manresa Medina, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Excellent Brands JMI Ltd (Baar, Switzerland)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word elements ‘Cremcaffé by Julius Meinl’ — Community trade mark No 11 406 782

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before OHIM

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 29 September 2015 in Case R 2756/2014-5

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | consider proved the use of the Community Trademark No 2 423 705 Class 30 deemed and the Community Trademark application No 11 406 782 is incompatible with the Community Trademark No 2 423 705; |
| --- | --- |

—

consider proved the use of the Community Trademark No 2 423 705 Class 30 deemed and the Community Trademark application No 11 406 782 is incompatible with the Community Trademark No 2 423 705;

| — | order OHIM and possible co-defendants to pay all costs of the procedure. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM and possible co-defendants to pay all costs of the procedure.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Erroneous interpretation of Article 15(1), 15(1)(a) and Article 8(1)(b) CTMR. |
| --- | --- |

—

Erroneous interpretation of Article 15(1), 15(1)(a) and Article 8(1)(b) CTMR.

---
EXHIBIT 10.6

               EXTENSION AGREEMENT TO INVESTMENT CONTRACT BETWEEN
    GOLDVISION TECHNOLOGIES LTD. AND STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS PARTNERS, INC.
                             DATED FEBRUARY 7, 2003










<PAGE>


                   EXTENSION AGREEMENT TO INVESTMENT CONTRACT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



                             EXTENSION AGREEMENT TO
                               INVESTMENT CONTRACT

         THIS AGREEMENT made as of the 7th day of February, 2003

BETWEEN:
          Beijing  Goldvision  Technologies Ltd. (Chinese characters omitted), a
          Chinese  company,  having an office at Central TV Tower No. 02-21, No.
          11 Xi San Huan Zhong Road, Beijing, People's Republic of China 100036

          (hereinafter called "Goldvision")
                                                      OF THE FIRST PART
AND:
          Strategic Communications Partners, Inc. a US company having its office
          at 7931  South Broadway, Suite 130, Littleton, CO 80122 United  States
          of America.

          (hereinafter called "SCP")
                                                      OF THE SECOND PART

WHEREAS:

1.       Goldvision  is in the  business of providing  satellite  communication,
         broadband Internet,  content, wireless access and transport in Beijing,
         People's Republic of China ("China");

2.       SCP is in the business of providing financial,  technical and marketing
         services based in Denver,  Colorado,  United States of America ("USA");
         and

3.       Goldvision wishes to sell and SCP wishes to purchase certain percentage
         of the equity ownership of Goldvision.

         In accordance with the relevant Chinese laws and regulations,  adhering
to  the  principle  of  equality  and  mutual   benefit  and  through   friendly
consultation, the parties agreed to reach this agreement to extend the due dates
of the  Investment  Contract  signed  December 18th and attached as part of this
modification by 60 days, and the other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

THE CORPORATE SEAL of                         )
STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS                      )
PARTNERS, INC.                                )
was affixed in the presence of:               )
                                              )
 /S/ KENT LAM                                 )
-------------------------------------         )
Authorised Signatory                          )

                                       1

<PAGE>
                   EXTENSION AGREEMENT TO INVESTMENT CONTRACT
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


THE CORPORATE SEAL of                         )
BEIJING GOLDVISION TECHNOLOGIES               )
LTD. was affixed in the presence of:          )
                                              )
   /S/   SIGNATURE UNKNOWN                    )
-------------------------------------         )
Authorised Signatory                          )














                                       2
Before the Second Division,

March 19, 1953

No. 57179.

protests 156237-K, etc. (New York).

#### Castello Fencing Equipment Co., Inc., and Rohner Gehrig & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that' the merchandise consists of foils and foil blades similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Castello Fencing Equipment Co., Inc.,*and *Rohner, Gehrig & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 72, C. D. 1447), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: March 26, 2015 517417 

________________________________

GARY L. BUTLER,

Appellant,

v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

STATE OF NEW YORK,

Respondent.

________________________________

Calendar Date: February 9, 2015

Before: Lahtinen, J.P., McCarthy, Lynch and Clark, JJ.

__________

Gary L. Butler, Ossining, appellant pro se.

Eric T. Schneiderman, Attorney General, Albany (Kathleen M.

Treasure of counsel), for respondent.

__________

McCarthy, J.

Appeal from an order of the Court of Claims (Milano, J.),

entered May 29, 2013, which, among other things, granted

defendant's cross motion to dismiss the claim.

Claimant, a prison inmate, commenced this action on June

23, 2010 by filing and serving a claim alleging damages resulting

from a dispute over the appropriate pay rate for his work in the

mess hall. Claimant alleged that his claim accrued on March 24,

2010. Defendant answered and asserted the affirmative defense

that the claim was untimely. Claimant thereafter moved for

summary judgment, and defendant cross-moved to dismiss the claim. 

The Court of Claims granted the cross motion and determined,

among other things, that the claim was untimely. Claimant now

appeals.
-2- 517417 

We affirm. Inasmuch as claimant sought to recover damages

stemming from the intentional tort of an officer of defendant, he

was obliged "to file and serve, within 90 days of the date of

accrual, either a claim or a written notice of intention to file

a claim" (Robinson v State of New York, 38 AD3d 1030, 1030

[2007]; see Court of Claims Act § 10 [3-b]; Pizarro v State of

New York, 19 AD3d 891, 892 [2005], lv denied 5 NY3d 717 [2005]). 

Claimant did not file and serve a notice of intention to file a

claim. Moreover, even assuming that the claim accrued on March

24, 2010, rather than earlier, the actual claim was not filed and

served in a timely manner. Thus, the Court of Claims properly

dismissed this action as untimely (see Robinson v State of New

York, 38 AD3d at 1030). Contrary to claimant's contention, there

was no indication of "misfeasance or malfeasance on the part of

facility officials" that would warrant an estoppel (Rivera v

State of New York, 5 AD3d 881, 881 [2004]).

The remaining arguments of the parties, to the extent they

are not academic in light of the foregoing, have been examined

and found to be lacking in merit.

Lahtinen, J.P., Lynch and Clark, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
Before the Third Division,

September 11, 1946

No. 51288.

#### Protests 103185-K, etc., of Samuel Shapiro & Co., Inc., et al. (Baltimore, etc.).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ALMA and ALEC RUSSELL, :

: CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-CV-4127

Plaintiffs, :

:

v. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION;

BAYER AG;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE;

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM

:

:

:

:

:

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

:

Defendants. :

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of the Court:

Kindly enter the appearances of Hope S. Freiwald, Aline Fairweather, Erin

Brennan and Kirstin J. Miller as attorneys for defendant SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a

GlaxoSmithKline.

Respectfully Submitted,

_____________________________ _____________________________

Hope S. Freiwald Aline Fairweather

_____________________________ _____________________________

Erin Brennan Kirstin J. Miller

DECHERT PRICE & RHOADS

4000 Bell Atlantic Tower

1717 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2793

(215) 994-4000

Case 2:02-cv-04127-JCJ Document 8 Filed 10/04/2002 Page 1 of 1
Exposure Report

PMN Number: P-13-0203 

4/1/2013 8:31:40 AM

Assessor: Kwon/SS

Ratings

Drop Criteria:

Criteria Reasoning:

Exposure Based Assessment:

Exposure-Based (Non-Occupational): 

Exposure-Based (Environmental): 

Exposure Parameter Exposure-Based Persistent/Bioaccum Exposure Value

Recommended Fate Tests:

Consumer Use expected? 

Consumer Use remarks: 

Scenario Comment Sites Location

1. Scenario -- Medium: (Engineering) ; To Model Send to Model , 

 2. Release -- Medium: Water or Incineration or Landfill ( 

3. Scenario -- Medium: (Engineering) ; 

 4. Release -- Medium: Incineration (Engineering) ;
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
This schedule contains summary financial information extracted from the Duke
Capital Corporation Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
1998 and is qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0001051116
<NAME>                        DUKE CAPITAL CORPORATION
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
       
<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                                   MAR-31-1998
<CASH>                                             46400
<SECURITIES>                                           0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    1364400
<ALLOWANCES>                                           0
<INVENTORY>                                       155600
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 2445600
<PP&E>                                           9898000
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3711000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  11096500
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            2429800
<BONDS>                                          2938900
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                  0
<PREFERRED>                                            0
<COMMON>                                               0
<OTHER-SE>                                       3505200
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    11096500
<SALES>                                          2513400
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3092600
<CGS>                                            2406400
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    2728500
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  107200
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 58200
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   302900
<INCOME-TAX>                                       88900
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               146700
<DISCONTINUED>                                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                     8000
<CHANGES>                                              0
<NET-INCOME>                                      138700
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                          0 <F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                          0 <F1>
        
<FN>
<F1> Not meaningful since Duke Capital Corporation is a
wholly-owned subsidiary.
</FN>

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Special Emphasis Panel; Autoimmunity Centers of Excellence, Basic Research Program (U19 Clinical Trial Not Allowed).                    

*Date:*                         December 6-8, 2023.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G31, Rockville, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         James T. Snyder, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Program, Division of Extramural Activities, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, 5601 Fishers Lane, Room 3G31, Rockville, MD 20892, (240) 669-5060,                         *james.snyder@nih.gov.*

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.855, Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation Research; 93.856, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Research, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: November 7, 2023.

David W. Freeman, 

Supervisory Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-24969 Filed 11-9-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
---

EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Xiana Mining Inc. (the
Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended January 31, 2016, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Rowland
Perkins, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

Dated: May 27, 2016

/s/ Carlos BallonCarlos BallonChief Executive Officer


---
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 999 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 999

Expressing agreement with the statements of the Speaker of the House of 
  Representatives made on July 16, 2018, regarding Russian Federation 
 interference in the 2016 United States elections and related matters.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             July 17, 2018

Mr. Engel submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 
                      Committee on Foreign Affairs

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Expressing agreement with the statements of the Speaker of the House of 
  Representatives made on July 16, 2018, regarding Russian Federation 
 interference in the 2016 United States elections and related matters.

Whereas, on July 16, 2018, the Speaker of the House of Representatives stated 
        that there is no question that the Russian Federation interfered in the 
        2016 United States elections and continues attempts to undermine 
        democracy in the United States and around the world;
Whereas the Speaker further stated that is not just the finding of the United 
        States intelligence community but also the Permanent Select Committee on 
        Intelligence of the House of Representatives;
Whereas the Speaker further stated that the President must appreciate that 
        Russia is not an ally of the United States;
Whereas the Speaker further stated that there is no moral equivalence between 
        the United States and Russia, which remains hostile to our most basic 
        values and ideals; and
Whereas the Speaker further stated that the United States must be focused on 
        holding Russia accountable and putting an end to its vile attacks on 
        democracy: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives expresses its agreement 
with the statements of the Speaker of the House of Representatives made 
on July 16, 2018, regarding Russian Federation interference in the 2016 
United States elections and related matters.
                                 <all>
```
No. P68/142.

protest 65/20219 (New York).

#### Panation Trade Co. *v.*United States,

Maletz, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of “piano wire bracelets” similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Devon Trading Company*v. *United States*(48 Cust. Ct. 451, Abstract 66761) following the decision in *The J. Orlando Co., Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 115, C.D. 2114), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
### SERVED: MARCH 6, 2012

U
.S. DEPARTMENT OFTRANSPORTATION OFFICE OF HEARINGS

WASHINGTON, DC
IN THE MATIER OF 

### FLYINGB AVIATION, LLC FAADOCKET No. [TO BE ASSIGNED] (Civil Penalty Case) FDMS No. FAA-2011-0066 

### ORDER OFDISMISSAL OnMarch 15, 2011, the Federal Aviation Administration ("Complainant") filed a Complaint. OnFebruary 26, 2011, Flying B Aviation, LLC ("Respondent") had filed a Request for Hearing. OnMarch 6, 2012, Complainant filed a Motion to Withdraw Complaint, citing settlement. 14 C.F.R. § 13.215 states: "At any timebefore or during a hearing, an agency attorney may withdraw a complaint or party may withdraw a request for a hearing without the consent ofthe administrative lawjudge. Ifan agency attorney withdraws the complaint or a party withdraws the request for a hearing and the answer, the administrative lawjudge shall dismiss the proceedings under this subpart with prejudice." WHEREFORE, Complainant's Motion to Withdraw Complainthaving been read and considered, it is ORDERED as follows: 1
. Complainant's Motion to Withdraw Complaintbe and is hereby granted; and2
2. This proceeding be and is hereby dismissed with prejudice. 

# (Jc£_,J; ("**~** (4? Richard C. Goodwin U.S. Administrative Law Judge Attachment- Service ListSERVICE LIST ORIGINAL & ONE COPY Federal Aviation Administration 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, DC 20591 Attention: Hearing Docket Clerk, AGC-430 Wilbur Wright Building-Suite 2W1000 1 ONE COPY Richard 

### A. Johnson, Respondent's Counsel 3815 Rickenbacker Street, Suite 208 Boise, ID 83705 TEL: 208-344-1384 FAX: 208-344-5121 Joann M. Putnam, Complainant's Counsel Attorney, Office ofthe Regional Counsel Northwest MountainRegion, ANM-7 Federal Aviation Administration 1601 Lind Avenue, S.W. Renton, WA 98057-3356 TEL: 425-227-2758 FAX: 425-227-1007 FDMS No. FAA-2011-0066 (Civil Penalty Action)

The Honorable Richard C. Goodwin, AdministrativeLawJudge Office ofHearings, M-20 U.S. Department ofTransportation 1200 NewJersey Avenue, S.E. Washington, DC 20590 TEL: 202-366-2139 Attorney-Advisor 202-366-5121 StaffAssistant/Paralegal FAX: 202-366-7536

1 Service was by U.S. Mail. For service in person orby expedited courier, use the following address: Federal Aviation Administration, 600 Independence Avenue, S.W., Wilbur Wright BuildingSuite 2WIOOO, Washington, DC 20591, Attention: HearingDocket Clerk, AGC-430.
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with the 20-F amended filing of Aquasol Envirotech, Ltd. (the Company) on Form 20-F, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Ken Z.Cai, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/ Ken Z. Cai

Chief Executive Officer

Date:  June 21, 2006