alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 23.1

               CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT AUDITORS


     We consent to the  reference  to our firm under the  caption  "Experts"  in
Amendment  No. 2 to the  Registration  Statement  Form S-3, No.  333-105011  and
related Prospectus of Factory 2-U Stores, Inc. for the registration of 2,590,379
shares of its common stock and to the  incorporation by reference therein of our
report dated  February 24, 2003,  with respect to the financial  statements  and
schedule of Factory 2-U Stores,  Inc.  included in its Annual Report (Form 10-K)
for the year ended  February 1, 2003,  filed with the  Securities  and  Exchange
Commission.


                                                           /s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP
San Diego, California
July 30, 2003
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Office of the Secretary

          - [245D0102DM, DS6CS00000, DLSN00000.000000, DX.6CS25]

# AGENCY:

Office of the Secretary, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice of appointments.

# SUMMARY:

This notice provides the names of individuals appointed to serve on the Department of the Interior Senior Executive Service (SES) Performance Review Board.

# DATES:

                        These appointments take effect upon publication in the                         **Federal Register**                        .                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        To request additional information about this notice, contact Mark Green, Deputy Assistant Secretary—Human Capital and Diversity/Chief Human Capital Officer, by email at                         *Mark_Green@ios.doi.gov,*                         or by telephone at (202) 208-3100.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The individuals appointed to serve on the Department of the Interior SES Performance Review Board are as follows:

ANDERSON, JIM

BEARQUIVER, KEVIN

BOATMAN, QUAN

DEAM, SETH

GALLAGHER, KEVIN

HALL, KIM

MCDOWALL, LENA

RABY, JON

RAUCH, PAUL

SMILEY, KARLA

STREATER, EDDIE

TUCKER, KAPRICE

*Authority:*                     Title 5, U.S. Code, 4314.                

Mark D. Green,

Deputy Assistant Secretary—Human Capital and Diversity, Chief Human Capital Officer.

[FR Doc. 2023-24908 Filed 11-9-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4334-63-P
No. 52192.

protests 733484-G, etc. (New York).

#### Abouchar & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6237
GARY JACKSON, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus DARRELL HOOPER, Welding Instructor; PIEDMONT COMMUNITY COLLEGE, Defendants - Appellees, and MRS. OWENS, Vocational Programmer; CASWELL CORRECTIONAL CENTER, Defendants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Wallace W. Dixon, Magistrate Judge. (1:05-cv-00096-WWD) Submitted: September 5, 2007 Decided: September 13, 2007 Before WILKINSON and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.- 2 - Gary Jackson, Appellant ProSe. Alan S. Hicks, ALAN S. HICKS, P.A., Roxboro, North Carolina; Yvonne Bullock Ricci, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.* The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2007). - 3 - PER CURIAM: Gary Jackson appeals the magistrate judge’s * order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge. Jackson v. Hooper , No. 1:05-cv-00096-WWD (M.D.N.C. Jan. 25, 2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 49541.

#### Protest 91930-K of Border Brokerage Co. (Seattle).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

At the trial it developed that the liquidation was made June 9, 1942, and the protest was filed August 12, 1942. In view of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930, and an examination of the official papers, the protest was dismissed.
No. 54544.

#### A. G. Parser, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 157452-K (New York).

*241Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the-court dismissed the protest.
No. 50298.

#### Protest 975649-G of Mrs. Bice Nannelli (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

When the case was called for trial plaintiff’s counsel stated that he had repeatedly tried to find the importer but had been unable to locate her. At the Government’s request the case was ordered submitted. An examination of the record failed to disclose evidence sufficient to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the collector’s decision. The protest was therefore overruled.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as *

provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The Honorable James G. Carr, Senior District Judge for the U.S. District Court for **

the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BARBARA J. HAMILTON,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,

 Defendant - Appellee.

No. 11-15140

D.C. No. 1:09-cv-01427-SMS

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Sandra M. Snyder, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted November 30, 2011

San Francisco, California

Before: THOMAS and CLIFTON, Circuit Judges, and CARR, Senior District

Judge.** 

Appellant Barbara J. Hamilton appeals the denial of Social Security disability

benefits. We reverse and remand. Because the parties are familiar with the facts and

the procedural history, we will not recount them here.

FILED

JAN 03 2012

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
-2-

Hamilton contends that the ALJ’s finding of fact that she must be able to “sit

and stand at will” mandated a finding of disabled given her age, education, work

experience, and residual functional capacity (RFC). A finding that a claimant must be

able to sit and stand at will does not necessarily leave only sedentary and unskilled

positions (and therefore does not automatically mandate a finding of disabled in all

cases) under the Medical-Vocational Guidelines. 

Hamilton contends, however, that the ALJ’s hypothetical to the vocational

expert (VE) did not accurately incorporate the at will sit/stand option. To be sure, the

hypothetical could be construed as accurately stating Hamilton’s RFC. But the light

positions the VE pointed out to the ALJ cannot accommodate Hamilton’s at will

sit/stand limitation, according to the VE’s own testimony. 

The ALJ should have resolved the discrepancy between the hypothetical he

posed and the VE’s response before he relied on the VE testimony to conclude there

are sufficient jobs Appellant can perform and thereon denied benefits. 

Substantial evidence does not support a finding of disability where the VE’s

testimony either is contradictory or responds to an inaccurate hypothetical. Taylor v.

Comm’r of Social Sec. Admin., 659 F.3d 1228, 1235 (9th Cir. 2011). 
-3-

An immediate award of benefits is not necessary here, where the discrepancy

can be resolved by remanding to the Social Security Administration. Marcia v.

Sullivan, 900 F.2d 172, 176 (9th Cir. 1990). 

REVERSED AND REMANDED.
## POT·Osr"·10ll..

## blO'l

RESOLUTION NO, 2012-17 City ofRhinelander Support Regarding Docket OST-2012-0109 Rhinelander, Wisconsin Airport

, THE COMMON COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RHINELANDER DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, The U.S. Department ofTransportation, Office ofAviation Analysis is considering under Docket OST**~20 12~**  0109 proposal to provide essential air transportation to Rhinelander, Wisconsin. WHEREAS, the**Sky~**est Airline has a strong history ofproviding reliable Essential Air Service critical to regions like our Northwood Region consisting ofnotthern Wisconsin and the upper peninsula ofMichigan served by the Rhinelander/Oneida Cou11ty Airport. WHEREAS, continued regional growth is greatly influenced 

# ?Y reli.able air service to major**airlin~** hubs; and WHEREAS, SkyWest Airlines will provide the required airline hub support that will support local businesses; and WHEREAS, tourism is the Northwoods region's second largest economic sector; and WHEREAS, SkyWest Airlines will provide the required airline hub support that 

### will support tourism in the NmthwoOds region; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Common Council ofthe City ofRhinelander Does Hereby strongly support the SkyWest Airline application to provide Essential Air Services to the Rhinelander/Oneida County Airport.

CERTIFICATE STATE OF WISCONSIN ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ONEIDA) I, Valerie, Deputy City Clerk ofthe City ofRhinelander, do hereby certi:fythatthe foregoing resolution was duly adopted at a meeting ofthe Common Council ofthe City ofRhinelander, held at City Hall on the 13th day ofAugust, 2012 at 6:00 p.m., the vote on the resolution being**~8-** Aye and _Q_ Nay.

Valarie Foley, City Clerk City ofRhinelander Oneida County, Wiscon'sin

i

.........l-

(J'l
icfi-ex43_10.htm



Exhibit 4.3

DESCRIPTION OF THE REGISTRANT’S SECURITIES 

REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12 OF THE 

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 

As of February 26, 2021, ICF International, Inc. has one class of securities registered under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”): (1) our Common Stock.

Description of Common Stock

The following description of our Common Stock is a summary and does not purport to be complete. It is subject to and qualified in its entirety by reference to our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (the “Articles of Incorporation”) and our Amended and Restated Bylaws (the “Bylaws”), each of which are incorporated by reference as an exhibit to the Annual Report on Form 10-K of which this Exhibit 4.1 is a part. We encourage you to read our Articles of Incorporation, our Bylaws and the applicable provisions of Delaware General Corporation Law, for additional information. 

Authorized Capital Shares 

The total number of shares of stock which the Corporation shall have the authority to issue is seventy-five million (75,000,000), seventy million (70,000,000) of which shall be shares of Common Stock with a par value of $0.001 per share and five million (5,000,000) of which shall be shares of Preferred Stock with a par value of $0.001 per share.

Voting Rights

Holders of Common Stock are entitled to one vote per share on all matters voted on by the stockholders, including the election of directors. Our Common Stock does not have cumulative voting rights.

Dividend Rights

Subject to the rights of holders of outstanding shares of Preferred Stock, if any, the holders of Common Stock are entitled to receive dividends, if any, as may be declared from time to time by the Board of Directors in its discretion out of funds legally available for the payment of dividends.

Liquidation Rights

Subject to any preferential rights of outstanding shares of Preferred Stock, holders of Common Stock will share ratably in all assets legally available for distribution to our stockholders in the event of dissolution.

Other Rights and Preferences

Our Common Stock has no sinking fund or redemption provisions or preemptive, conversion or exchange rights. Holders of Common Stock may act by unanimous written consent. 

Listing

The Common Stock is traded on The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC under the trading symbol “ICFI.”
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS45600 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
11/1/2012 4:01 AM10/31/2012 3:04

PM

11/1/2012 4:04 AM

10/31/2012 2:56

PM

11/1/20124:14 AM

11/1/20124:12 AM

10/31/2012 2:57

PM

10/31/2012 2:56PM

10/31/2012 2:56

PM

10/31/2012 2:57PM

10/31/2012 2:56

PM

11/1/2012 4:45 AM

11/2/2012 9:11 AM

11/1/20124:18 AM

To: bill.osullivan@dep.state.nj.us

(bill.osullivan@dep.statenj.us)

CC: Brian Hug (bhug@mde.state.md.us)

To: cecily.bealldc.gov (cecily.beall@dc.gov)

CC: Debbie Rabin (drabin@mde.state.md.us)

CC: Diane Franks (dfranks@mde.state.md.us)

CC: frankford.harold@epa.gov (frankford.harold@epa.gov)

To: jepps@statepa.us Oepps@state.pa.us)

To: John.ABenedictwv.gov (JohnA.Benedict@wv.gov)

CC: lindenmelissa@epa.gov (linden.melissa©epa.gov)To: mgdowd@deq.virginia.gov (mgdowd@deq.virginia.gov)

CC: Roger Thunell (rthunell@mde.state.nid.us)

BC: Sally Frampton (sframpton@mde.statejmd.us)

CC: Tad Aburn (gaburn@mdestate.md.us)

DownloadedDelivered

Third-Party

Downloaded

Transferred

Third-Party

Downloaded

Third-Party

Downloaded

Transferred

Transferred

Transferred

Transferred

TransferredThird-Party

Downloaded

Read

Third-Party

Downloaded

2.0.0 message

relayed

2.0.0 message

relayed

file :///C :/U sers/jwilkinson!AppDatalLocallTemp/XPgrpwise/50913 Cl 9MDEDOMpo21in.. 11/30/2012
No. 67762.

#### Hybern, Inc., dba The Akron *v.*United States,

protests 61/8894 and 61/19668 (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of chessboards which have marble as their component material of chief value, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 63522.

protests 322434-K, etc. (New York).

#### Kaiser Reismann Corporation *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of synthetic filaments similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Empire Brushes, Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(42 Cust. Ct. 145, C.D. 2078), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
EXHIBIT 23.2


                    CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS


As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the inclusion in this
Form 10-K of our report dated January 21, 2000. It should be noted that we have
not audited any financial statements of the Company subsequent to January 2,
2000, or performed any audit procedures subsequent to the date of our report.

                                                     /s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP





Philadelphia, PA
March 29, 2001


<PAGE>
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-24-00105-CV

IN THE INTEREST OF S.P., N.I.A.D., A.D., and N.C.N.D., Children

From the 73rd Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2022-PA-01460

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARTINEZ, JUSTICE ALVAREZ, AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is 

AFFIRMED. The appellant is indigent. No costs are assessed.

SIGNED June 20, 2024.

_____________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
EXHIBIT 8  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the annual report of
Enerplus Resources Fund (the Fund) on Form 40-F for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert J. Waters, Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of EnerMark Inc., on behalf of the Fund, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial
condition and results of operations of the Fund.   /s/ Robert J. WatersRobert J. WatersSenior Vice President and
  Chief Financial Officer of EnerMark Inc.  April 22, 2004
### SAT Report PMN Number: P-13-0075 SAT Date: 11/9/2012 Print Date: 2/4/2013

Related cases : Health related cases : Ecotox related cases:

Concern levels : Type of Concern: Health Eco Comments Level of Concern: 2 3

Persistence Bioaccum Toxicity Comments 1 11

Exposure Based Review : Health: N o Ecotox: Yes
Routes of exposure : Health: Dermal Inhalation Ecotox: All releases to water Fate: ; Keywords : Keywords: IRR-E,S,L,MM, LUNG, UNCERT-SENS, AQUATOX-A,C
Summary of Assessment :

Fate : Fate Summary: P-13-0063-77 FATE: Estimations for typical Liquid with MP < 25 C (E) log Kow = 3.30 (E) S = Dispersible / 73.2 mg/L at 25 C (ICB / E) VP < 1.0E-6 torr at 25 C (E) BP > 400 C (E) H < 1.00E-8 (E) log Koc = 5.66 (E) log Fish BCF = 1.85 (E)log Fish BAF = 1.79 (E) POTW removal (%) = 90 via sorption Time for complete ultimate aerobic biodeg = wk-mo Sorption to soils/sediments = v.strong PBT Potential: P1B1 *CEB FATE: Migration to ground water = negl

Health : Health Summary: Absorption is poor through the skin, moderate through the GI tract, and good through the lungs based on analogs. The PMN material is expected to be a strong irritant to all exposed tissues based on the amines and the surfactant properties of the material. There is also concern for lung effects if respirable particles are inhaled based on cationic binding to lung tissues and/or interference with the natural surfactant balance in the lungs. There is uncertain concern for sensitization for the . Moderate

concern.

Ecotox :
Test Organism Test Type Test End Point Predicted Measured Comments

fish 96-h LC50 3.1 aliphatic amine SAR daphnid 48-h LC50 0.47 aliphatic amine SAR green algal 96-h EC50 0.18 amide SAR fish

_ chronic value 0.023 amide SAR daphnid

_ chronic value 0.050 aliphatic amine SAR

algal

_ chronic value 0.074 aliphatic amine SAR
Sewage Sludge 3-h EC50

_ Sewage Sludge

_ Chronic Value _

Ecotox Values Comments: Predictions are based on SARs for aliphatic amines and amides; SAR chemical class = aliphatic amine, amide; ; liquid; log Kow = 4.21 (EPI); S = dispersible in water at 25 C (P); p H7; effective concentrations based on 100% active ingredients and mean measured concentrations; hardness < 150.0 mg/L as CaCO3; and TOC <2.0 mg/L;

Factors Values Comments Assessment Factor 10 Concentration of Concern ( p pb) 2 amide SAR

SARs aliphatic amines and amides SAR Class aliphatic amine, amide Ecotox Category N oneEcotox Factors Comments:

SAT Chair: Becky Jones
# C_2015354EN.01004501.xml

| 26.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 354/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 354/45

---

Action brought on 3 September 2015 — Kessel medintim v OHIM — Janssen-Cilag GmbH (Premeno)

(Case T-509/15)

(2015/C 354/55)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Kessel medintim GmbH (Mörfelden-Walldorf, Germany) (represented by: A. Jacob and U. Staudenmaier, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Janssen-Cilag GmbH (Neuss, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘Premeno’ — Application No 6 408 926

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before OHIM

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 2 July 2015 in Case R 349/2015-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision and dismiss the opposition; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision and dismiss the opposition;

| — | in the alternative: refer the opposition back to OHIM for a new decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative: refer the opposition back to OHIM for a new decision;

| — | order OHIM to pay the cost of the proceedings in accordance with Article 134(1) TFEU. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the cost of the proceedings in accordance with Article 134(1) TFEU.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 75(2) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 75(2) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
**Exhibit
      32.1**





**CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of SRKP 5, Inc.. (the "Company") on Form
      10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities
      and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Richard Rappaport,
      certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of
      the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/
              Richard
              Rappaport
              Richard
                Rappaport
              Principal
                Executive Officer
              March
                15, 2006