alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 32(i)

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection  with the  quarterly  report on Form 10-QSB of Dialog Group,
Inc.  (the  "Company")  for the  quarter  ended June 30,  2006 as filed with the
Securities  and  Exchange  Commission  on the date  hereof (the  "Report"),  the
undersigned,  Peter V. DeCrescenzo,  the Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, that:

      (1) the Report  fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section  13(a)
or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: November 10, 2006

                                        /s/ Peter V. DeCrescenzo
                                        ----------------------------------
                                        Peter V. DeCrescenzo, CEO
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6066

JAMES MICHAEL LUCAS,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

MICHAEL MCCALL, Warden of the Lee Correctional Institution,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Aiken. Timothy M. Cain, District Judge. 

(1:12-cv-02879-TMC)

Submitted: April 30, 2014 Decided: May 13, 2014

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Michael Lucas, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, 

Senior Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for 

Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

James Michael Lucas seeks to appeal the district 

court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate 

judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012)

petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice 

or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2253(c)(1)(A) (2012). A certificate of appealability will not 

issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a 

constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012). When the 

district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies 

this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would 

find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional 

claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 

484 (2000); see Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 

(2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural 

grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive 

procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a 

debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 

529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Lucas has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we 

deny a certificate of appealability, deny Lucas’ motion to 

appoint counsel, deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis, and 

dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the 
3

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statements on Form S-3 (Nos. 333-134911, 333-149170, 333-150359, 333-150368) and Form S-8 (No. 333-106311, 333-150356, 333-151916) of our report dated February 27, 2009, relating to the consolidated financial statements and internal control
over financial reporting of GMX Resources Inc. and Subsidiaries, included in this Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2008 and to the reference to us under the heading Experts in such Prospectus.



/s/ Smith, Carney & Co., p.c.Smith, Carney & Co., p.c.


Oklahoma City, OK

May 11, 2009
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Shoe Pavilion, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 2, 2005 (the Report), I, Dmitry Beinus, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and I, John D. Hellmann Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                               
|-----------------------------------------------
|/s/ Dmitry Beinus                              
|Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
|August 16, 2005                                
|                                               
|/s/ John D. Hellmann                           
|Vice President and Chief Financial Officer     
|August 16, 2005
##### 



Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: May 1, 2006
    
    By:
    
    /s/ John S. DavisJohn S. DavisPresident andChief Executive Officer
No. 58451.

protest 220064-K (New York).

#### Swan Mill, Inc. *v.*United States,

*399Opinion by

Rao, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is similar in all material respects to the paper napkins the subject of *Wesley & Winter, Inc.*v. *United States*(32 Cust. Ct. 24, C. D. 1575). Upon the agreed statement of facts and following the cited authority, it was held that the merchandise is dutiable at 15 percent under paragraph 1413, as modified, *supra.*
EXHIBIT 99.2





CERTIFICATION





Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Section 906 of the
Public Company Accounting Reform and Investor Protection Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted), Graham Smith, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary of Vitria Technology, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the
Company) hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge, as follows:





The Companys
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2002, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 99.2 (the Periodic Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition at the end of the period covered by the Periodic Report and results of operations of the
Company for the period covered by the Periodic Report.





IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of this 14th day of November 2002.





By:

/s/    GRAHAM SMITHGraham Smith Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Secretary
os ayaa
THE NoRTHERN [RUST COMPANY

FIFTY SOUTH LASALLE STREET TT q l

CHICAGO, ILLINOIS GOG7S oY 3

TELEPHONE (312) 630-6000

TREASURY DEPARTMENT September 24, 1999

Ms. Cynthia L. Johnson

Director, Cash Management Policy & Planning Division
Financial Management Services

Room 420

401 14th Street, SW

Washington, D.C. 20227

Dear Ms. Johnson:

This letter is The Northern Trust Company's response to a letter we received from the Federal
Reserve Bank of Chicago, dated August 9, 1999, regarding the "Proposed Amendment to
Treasury Tax and Loan Rate of Interest.

The radical change in the rate of interest TT&L depositaries currently pay to the proposed rate
structure (a soon to be published overnight repurchase agreement rate), expected to be on average
23 basis points higher, would force Northern Trust to drastically alter our participation in the
program. Your proposed amendment compares the TT&L deposits to repurchase agreement
transactions, which as a matter of principle is valid. However, from a practical standpoint as a
depositary the margin requirements on the collateral would make taking these deposits a third or
forth option for us going forward. We (Northern Trust) would be more inclined to utilize the
open market where the rates and tenor on repurchase agreement transactions are more negotiable,
and the margin requirements are more "friendly." At this moment it is hard to say exactly how
much the proposed changes would decrease our involvement in the TT&L program. It would not
be out of the question for us to terminate our participation in the program altogether.

The methodology of the proposed rate structure appears to have been well thought out. However.
Northern Trust's interest in remaining a depositary institution is rooted in the current spread of 25
basis points below the reported Effective Fed Funds rate for the day.

Asa matter of course, we (Northern Trust) are always interested in term funding opportunities.
We would be very interested in guaranteed term TT&L deposits (should they become available)
if the rates were conducive to our term funding strategies.

CL. .
hee a YE ob
Charles Banks

Second Vice President
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 217 (Monday, November 13, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 77615-77616]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-24956]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION

[Notice: (23-117)]


NASA Advisory Council; Aeronautics Committee; Meeting

AGENCY: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act, the 
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) announces a 
meeting of the Aeronautics Committee

[[Page 77616]]

of the NASA Advisory Council (NAC). This Committee reports to the NAC. 
This meeting will be held for the purpose of soliciting, from the 
aeronautics community and other persons, research and technical 
information relevant to program planning.

DATES: Wednesday, November 29, 2023, 1:00 p.m.-5:30 p.m. ET; and 
Thursday, November 30, 2023, 9:00 a.m.-12:00 p.m. ET.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Irma Rodriguez, Designated Federal 
Officer, Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate, NASA Headquarters, 
Washington, DC 20546, (202) 358-0984, or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#83eaf1eee2ade0adf1ece7f1eae4f6e6f9c3ede2f0e2ade4ecf5"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="fb9289969ad598d589949f89929c8e9e81bb959a889ad59c948d">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: This meeting will be virtual for the public 
and available online. Dial-in audio teleconference and webcast details 
to watch the meeting remotely will be available on the NAC Aeronautics 
Committee website at https://www.nasa.gov/nasa-advisory-council-aeronautics-committee/. Enter the meeting as a guest and type your name 
and affiliation. Note: If dialing in, please ``mute'' your telephone. 
The agenda for the meeting includes the following topics:

--Verification & Validation Complex Systems Support
--Aeronautics Research Mission Directorate (ARMD) Diversity, Equity, 
Inclusion and Accessibility (DEIA) Plan, Efforts and Priorities
--Sky for All
--2022 Committee Findings and Recommendations Response
--Advanced Capabilities for Emergency Response Operations (ACERO)

    It is imperative that the meeting be held on these dates to the 
scheduling priorities of the key participants.

Patricia Rausch,
Advisory Committee Management Officer, National Aeronautics and Space 
Administration.
[FR Doc. 2023-24956 Filed 11-9-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7510-13-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. 51295.

#### Protests 49963-K, etc., of Antolini & Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise consist of cheese the same in all material respects as that the subject of *Kraft Phenix Cheese Corp.*v. *United States*(T. D. 47955). In accordance therewith it was held that an allowance for the weight of the paper or foil, or both, should have been made by the collector from the net weight used in computing the duty thereon. The protests were sustained to this extent.
No. 50336.

#### Protests 801489-G, etc., of G. H. & I. Jaffe, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It was stipulated that the goatskins are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Winograd Bros.*(32 C. C. P. A. 153, C. A. D. 302), which record was admitted in evidence herein. In accordance therewith the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.
No. 49543.

#### Protests 104313-K, etc., of Bullocks, Inc., et al. (Los Angeles, etc.).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed- the protests.
# August 2022
No. 59442.

protest 256617-K (New York).

#### Ira Furman Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of toy pianos similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Langfelder, Homma & Carroll, Inc.*v. *United States*(32 Cust. Ct. 281, C. D. 1614), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# C_2015262EN.01003702.xml

| 10.8.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.8.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/37

---

Action brought on 24 June 2015 — Josel v OHIM — Nationale-Nederlanden Nederland (NN)

(Case T-333/15)

(2015/C 262/51)

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Josel, SL (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: J. L. Rivas Zurdo, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Nationale-Nederlanden Nederland BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant for the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word element ‘NN’ — Application for registration No 1 066 097

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before OHIM

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 14 April 2015 in Case R 1531/2014-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision, insofar as, in dismissing in part the appeal brought by the applicant for the trade mark, it upholds the decision of the Opposition Division rejecting opposition B 1 887 887 and granting Community trade mark (international registration) No 1 066 097 ‘NN’, Class 36, (word mark); |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision, insofar as, in dismissing in part the appeal brought by the applicant for the trade mark, it upholds the decision of the Opposition Division rejecting opposition B 1 887 887 and granting Community trade mark (international registration) No 1 066 097 ‘NN’, Class 36, (word mark);

| — | order the party or parties opposing this action to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the party or parties opposing this action to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(a) and (b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(a) and (b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
EXHIBIT 99.11

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Enerplus Resources Fund (the "Fund") on Form 40-F for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Gordon J. Kerr, President and Chief Executive Officer of
EnerMark Inc., on behalf of the Fund, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

/s/ GORDON J. KERR Gordon J. Kerr
President and Chief Executive Officer
of EnerMark Inc.


March 12,
2010

The foregoing certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that
section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically
incorporates it by reference.

---



QuickLinks
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JOHN J. KORESKO, V and PENNMONT
BENEFIT SERVICES, INC.

Plaintiffs,
v. Civil Action No. 2:04-cv-00769
JEFF BLEIWEIS, RAYMOND G. ANKNER,
CJA AND ASSOCIATES, INC., THE
TRAVELERS LIFE AND ANNUITY
COMPANY

Defendants.

WITHDRAWAL OF APPEARANCE

Kindly withdraw the appearance of Michael G. Trachtman of Powell Trachtman Logan
Carrle & Lombardo, PC on behalf of Plaintiffs John J. Koresko, V and PennMont Benefit
Services, Inc. in the above matter.

POWELL, TRACHTMAN, LOGAN,
CARRLE & LOMBARDO, P.C.

By: /s/ Michael G. Trachtman
Michael G. Trachtman (PA 19525)
475 Allendale Road, Suite 200
King of Prussia, PA 19406
Telephone: (610) 354-9700
Facsimile: (610) 354-9760

Date: November 20, 2008

KOP:346513v1 5319-03


CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, Michael G. Trachtman, Esquire, hereby certify that, on the date indicated below, a true
and correct copy of the foregoing Withdrawal of Appearance was electronically filed with the
Court using the CM/ECF system. Notice of this filing will be sent to all parties by operation of
the Court’s electronic filing system. Parties may access this filing through the Court’s system.

POWELL, TRACHTMAN, LOGAN,
CARRLE & LOMBARDO, P.C.

By: /s/ Michael G. Trachtman
Michael G. Trachtman (PA 19525)
475 Allendale Road, Suite 200
King of Prussia, PA 19406
Telephone: (610) 354-9700
Facsimile: (610) 354-9760

Date: November 20, 2008

KOP:346513v1 5319-03
Before the First Division,

April 1, 1958

No. 61751.

#### Frank P. Dow Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 279691-K (Seattle).

*502Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is similar in all material respects to that the subject of Abstract 60266, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
United States Department of Agriculture

Agricultural Marketing Service, Science & Technology

Pesticide Data Program

SOP No.: PDP-LABOP-10 Page 1 of 11

Title: Laboratory Procedures for Acute Dietary Risk Survey, Organophosphates and Carbamates in Apples

Revision: 1 Replaces: 01/01/99 Effective: 05/01/99
United States Department of Agriculture

Agricultural Marketing Service, Science & Technology

Pesticide Data Program

SOP No.: PDP-LABOP-10 Page 2 of 11

Title: Laboratory Procedures for Acute Dietary Risk Survey, Organophosphates and Carbamates in Apples

Revision: 1 Replaces: 01/01/99 Effective: 05/01/99
United States Department of Agriculture

Agricultural Marketing Service, Science & Technology

Pesticide Date Program

SOP No.: PDP-LABOP-10 Page 8 of 9

USDA, AMS Organophosphate/Apples Acute Dietary Risk Survey Protocol, 10/1/98

5. Summary:
United States Department of Agriculture

Agricultural Marketing Service, Science & Technology

Pesticide Date Program

SOP No.: PDP-LABOP-10 Page 8 of 9

of the sample to come in contact with a portion(s) of anothersample(s), the a
United States Department of Agriculture

Agricultural Marketing Service, Science & Technology

Pesticide Date Program

SOP No.: PDP-LABOP-10 Page 8 of 9
United States Department of Agriculture

Agricultural Marketing Service, Science & Technology

Pesticide Date Program

SOP No.: PDP-LABOP-10 Page 8 of 9

precision which, for a 50 gram sample shall not be more than +/- 0.25 grams.

b. Sample Set Requirements
United States Department of Agriculture

Agricultural Marketing Service, Science & Technology

Pesticide Date Program

SOP No.: PDP-LABOP-10 Page 8 of 9
United States Department of Agriculture

Agricultural Marketing Service, Science & Technology

Pesticide Date Program

SOP No.: PDP-LABOP-10 Page 8 of 9

following established RDE procedures.
United States Department of Agriculture

Agricultural Marketing Service, Science & Technology

Pesticide Date Program

SOP No.: PDP-LABOP-10 Page 8 of 9

successfully transmitted via RDE to USDA, AMS, Residue Branch. Disposal shall

be documented (e.g., freezer log, sample log, extraction worksheet) and shall contain

a minimum of date of disposal, sample number, and initials of the individual who

discarded the sample.
United States Department of Agriculture

Agricultural Marketing Service, Science & Technology

Pesticide Date Program

SOP No.: PDP-LABOP-10 Page 8 of 9

Roger Pollman 5/6/99

Approved By: Roger Pollman Date

Technical Program Manager

New York Dept. of Agriculture & Markets

Food Laboratory
United States Department of Agriculture

Agricultural Marketing Service, Science & Technology

Pesticide Date Program

SOP No.: PDP-LABOP-10
# C_2015228EN.01002101.xml

| 13.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 228/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 228/21

---

Action brought on 4 May 2015 — QuaMa Quality Management v OHIM — Microchip Technology (medialbo)

(Case T-225/15)

(2015/C 228/26)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: QuaMa Quality Management GmbH (Glashütten, Germany) (represented by: C. Russ, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Microchip Technology, Inc. (Chandler, United States of America)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Applicant: Applicant

Applicant:

Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘medialbo’ — Application No 11 454 766

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before OHIM

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 19 February 2015 in Joined Cases R 1809/2014-4 and R 1680/2014-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision. |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 41(1) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 41(1) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---