alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2017374EN.01000701.xml

| 6.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 374/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 374/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 7 September 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof — Austria) — Austria Asphalt GmbH & Co OG v Bundeskartellanwalt

(Case C-248/16) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Competition - Concentrations between undertakings - Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 - Article 3(1)(b) and (4) - Scope - Definition of ‘concentration’ - Change in the form of control of an existing undertaking which, previously exclusive, becomes joint - Creation of a joint venture performing on a lasting basis all the functions of an autonomous economic entity))

(2017/C 374/09)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Oberster Gerichtshof

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Austria Asphalt GmbH & Co OG

Applicant:

Defendant: Bundeskartellanwalt

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 3 of Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 of 20 January 2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings (the EC Merger Regulation) must be interpreted as meaning that a concentration is deemed to arise upon a change in the form of control of an existing undertaking which, previously exclusive, becomes joint, only if the joint venture created by such a transaction performs on a lasting basis all the functions of an autonomous economic entity.

---

(1)  OJ C 260, 18.7.2016.

1

---
RITS Drawdown Update

As a reminder, we wish to communicate to all RITS users that they must 

exit the Transaction Screen properly and should not have the 

Transaction Screen open during the drawdown process. To properly 

exit the Transaction Screen a user must select the action button for 

“Another Payroll”.

Unexpected actions such as multiple reversals, transactions not 

processed and etc. can occur when the Transaction Screen is open 

during the drawdown.

OPM drawdown time for RITS is between 09:30 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. 

(EST). During this time we ask that you not open or view the

Transaction Screen, update a transaction, enter Process, enter Submit, 

or enter Process and Submit. For any questions please contact 

FFSAMS@opm.gov.
SOP No. DATA-3 Page 1 of 3
SOP No. DATA-3 Page 2 of 3
No. 51314.

#### Protests 972406-G, etc., of Balfour, Guthrie & Co., Ltd., et al. (Portland, Oreg., and San Francisco).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              18 USC, SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the/quarterly report of Dragon International Group Corp.
(the  "Company") on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2004,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission (the "Report"),  we, David
Wu,  the Chief  Executive  Officer  of the  Company,  and Xiali  Gan,  the Chief
Financial  Officer of the  Company,  certify,  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C.  Section  1350),  that to the best of our
knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Dated: November 16, 2004                      s/ David Wu
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              David Wu, Chief Executive Officer


Dated: November 16, 2004                      s/ Xiali Gan
                                              ----------------------------------
                                              Xiali Gan, Chief Financial Officer
Case 2:04-cv-02161-RB Document 11 Filed 01/18/05 Page 1 of 1
IPAC Monthly Operational Metrics - December 2016

Volume by Transaction Type
Dollar Amount] % of Total Dollar Amount] Number of Transactions] __ 9 of Total Number of Transactions
[Fiduciary (investment & Borrowing) 16,258 818,933,188 35.6255 10,870] 3.57%
fBuy/Sen '56,065,091,059 0.346 301,197| 29.13%
[Benefits (RITS) 6,434 360,672 0.0486 403
[Check Aftermath (TRACS) 124,727,535] 0.0085 7058]
[Zero Dollar | 0.00% ol
[Grand Total - December 2016 16,361,443,112,854| 100.00%| 713,538]
[Grand Total - November 2016 15,730,275,205,658| 100.00%| 96,674]
[November to December Change (631,167,907,155] eee)
Percentage Change 4.012% | 7-486]
[Grand Total - December 2015 13,824,666,810,326| [SSCSC«i2, SG |
[Dec 2015 to Dec 2016 Change 2,536,776,302,528| ee)
Percentage Change 18.3% | [08]
In the

Court of Appeals

Second Appellate District of Texas

at Fort Worth

___________________________

No. 02-24-00411-CV

___________________________

Original Proceeding

325th District Court of Tarrant County, Texas

Trial Court No. 325-707596-21

Before Womack, J.; Sudderth, C.J.; and Birdwell, J.

Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion

IN RE CONGHUA YAN, Relator
2

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The court has considered relator’s petition for writ of mandamus and is of the 

opinion that relief should be denied. Accordingly, relator’s petition for writ of 

mandamus is denied.

Per Curiam

Delivered: September 18, 2024
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

 

RAUL DEHOGUES, et al.,

 Plaintiffs,

 v.

BAYER CORPORATION, et al.,

 Defendants.

 

CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-4295

 

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 2nd day of July, 2002, the court having been previously advised

that the above action cannot proceed to trial and disposition because of the following reason:

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending disposition of a related action.

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending determination of arbitration

proceedings.

[ ] - Interlocutory appeal filed 

[X] - Other: Cases are placed into suspense pending receipt of the Case Transfer

Order from the Judicial Panel on Multi District Litigation transferring

cases to District of Minnesota. 

it is

ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall mark this action closed for statistical purposes

and place the matter in the Civil Suspense File, and it is 

FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction; and that the case be

restored to the trial docket when the action is in a status so that it may proceed to final 

Case 2:02-cv-04295-MK Document 2 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 1 of 2
disposition; this order shall not prejudice the rights of the parties to this litigation.

BY THE COURT:

______________________________

MARVIN KATZ, S.J.

Case 2:02-cv-04295-MK Document 2 Filed 07/02/2002 Page 2 of 2
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 901 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 901

 Calling on and encouraging the White House to issue a public apology.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 17, 2018

    Mr. Jones (for himself and Mr. Cleaver) submitted the following 
   resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 
                           Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
 Calling on and encouraging the White House to issue a public apology.

Whereas, on May 10, 2018, in response to Senator John McCain's call for fellow 
        senators to oppose the nomination of Gina Haspel to lead the Central 
        Intelligence Agency because she oversaw the agency's use of torture, 
        White House Communications Aide Kelly Sadler was widely reported to have 
        stated, ``It doesn't matter, he's dying anyway.'';
Whereas Senator McCain honorably served in the United States Navy from 1958 to 
        1981;
Whereas during that service, Senator McCain completed combat missions in 
        Vietnam;
Whereas Senator McCain was captured in Vietnam in 1967 and held as a prisoner of 
        war for five and a half years;
Whereas Senator McCain was repeatedly tortured as a prisoner of war in Vietnam;
Whereas Senator McCain has diligently served in Congress since 1983, and 
        continued to serve this Nation in a multitude of ways;
Whereas Senator McCain now has glioblastoma, an aggressive brain cancer;
Whereas every family deserves dignity and respect in the trying times of a loved 
        one's declining health;
Whereas our religious and social traditions call upon us to apologize for 
        wrongdoing; and
Whereas while this apology should have already taken place, it is never too late 
        to apologize: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives calls upon the White 
House to issue a public apology to Senator John McCain and his family 
for insensitive comments made by a staffer during this difficult time 
for the McCain family.
                                 <all>
```
ly Te
\ \ 023
First National Bank in Wadena

25 SW Bryant
PO Box 111
Wadena, MN 56482-0111

‘Telephone 218-631-1590
Fax 218-631-4020

September 2, 1999

Cynthia L. Johnson, Director

Cash Management Policy & Planning Division
Financial Management Service

Room 420

401 14th Street SW

Washington, D.C. 20227

Dear Ms. Johnson:

This letter pertains to the Proposed Amendment to Treasury Tax and Loan Rate of 1
Interest. In the event that the treasury elects to raise the interest rate charged on TT&L
Depositories for use of Treasury funds, it may mean that our bank would elect to opt out

of the note option position. Right now, with the status of the Fed Funds Rate minus 25
basis it warrants us staying as a note option bank. Any raise may create a situation where
the margin is not adequate to do so. I would hope the treasury would maintain the

present cost basis for charging for TT&L Funds.

Sincerely prow

ott JPettit
Vice President

FIRST NATIONAL “ADENA
Federal Housing Finance Agency

Constitution Center

400 7th Street, S.W.

Washington, D.C. 20219 

Telephone: (202) 649-3800 

Facsimile: (202) 649-1071 

www.fhfa.gov 

FHLBank System at 100 Roundtable: 

Affordable housing and community development 

in financially vulnerable communities 

Wednesday, February 15, 2023 | 9:30 a.m. – 12:30 p.m. PT

1. What role does the FHLBank System play in supporting affordable, equitable, sustainable, 

and resilient housing and homeownership among communities you serve? Can the 

FHLBanks play a larger role through their core business lines or with only limited subsidies 

(that is, beyond AHP)? If you don’t believe so, please explain why not. 

2. What about community development? Where does economic development factor in? 

3. What factors prevent the FHLBanks from playing a larger role in supporting affordable 

housing and community development? 

4. How might FHLBanks better use their targeted community lending plans to support housing 

and community initiatives? Is there a role for pilot programs? 

5. Are there particular populations, market segments, or purposes that the FHLBanks may be 

uniquely positioned to support? 

6. Beyond fair lending legal requirements, what equity considerations should be considered 

when developing and implementing FHLBank programs and products? Is there a role for 

pilot programs? 

7. What should the FHLBanks’ mission-related programs look like? If we could start from a 

blank slate, what would be key features? 

To submit in advance: 

• What is the single most important change you would recommend to best position the 

System to fulfill the role(s) you envision? If no changes are needed, why not? 

• Do you believe structural changes to the FHLBank System (e.g., consolidation, change in 

membership eligibility requirements) would be necessary or advisable to fulfill the role(s) 

you envision? Why or why not? 

• Other bullet points outlining the points you would like to discuss
No. P68/192.

protests 63/13693, etc. (New York).

#### The Durst Mfg. Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” or “B” covered by the foregoing protests consist of strainers similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Davies, Turner & Company*v. *United States*(55 Cust. Ct. 488, Abstract 69651), and that the strainers marked “A” are in chief value of brass and the strainers marked “B” are in chief value of zinc, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
# C_2015302EN.01006801.xml

| 14.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 302/68 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 302/68

---

Action brought on 17 July 2015 — PAL-Bullermann v OHMI — Symaga (PAL)

(Case T-397/15)

(2015/C 302/85)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: PAL-Bullermann GmbH (Friesoythe-Markhausen, Germany) (represented by: J. Eberhardt, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Symaga, SA (Villarta de San Juan, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark ‘PAL’— Community trade mark registration No 690 750

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

Procedure before OHIM

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 7 May 2015 in Case R 1626/2014-1

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | alter the contested decision so that the application for revocation is upheld in its entirety; |
| --- | --- |

—

alter the contested decision so that the application for revocation is upheld in its entirety;

| — | impose the costs to the defendant and the other party. |
| --- | --- |

—

impose the costs to the defendant and the other party.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 15(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 15(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Rule 22(3)(4) of Regulation No 2868/95. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Rule 22(3)(4) of Regulation No 2868/95.

---
**EXHIBIT 32.1****SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of GMX Resources Inc. (the “Company”),hereby certifies that the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A (Amendment No. 2) for the yearended December 31, 2006 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained inthe Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results ofoperations of the Company.        Date:  February 25, 2008 /s/ Ken L. Kenworthy, Jr.   Ken L. Kenworthy, Jr.   Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 7.1


<TABLE>
                                                                       AES DRAX ENERGY LIMITED
                               -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                          Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                               -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                 1999(1)     1999(1)      2000(2)      2000(2)      2001(2)      2001(2)      2002(2)      2002(2)
                                 UK GAAP     US GAAP      UK GAAP      US GAAP      UK GAAP      US GAAP      UK GAAP      US GAAP
                              (pound),000  (pound),000  (pound),000  (pound),000  (pound),000  (pound),000  (pound),000  (pound),000
<S>                               <C>         <C>          <C>          <C>         <C>          <C>         <C>          <C>
Income/(loss) from
   continuing operations
   before income taxes            15,695      18,365       8,644        65,807      (38,670)     (16,581)    (771,962)    (150,746)
Fixed Charges:
   Interest on long-term
   and short-term debt
   including amortization         15,099      11,901     182,393       137,473      203,642      159,768      212,334      163,964
   of debt expense
Total fixed charges               15,099      11,901     182,393       137,473      203,642      159,768      212,334      163,964
Earnings before income            30,794      30,266     191,037       203,280      164,972      143,187     (559,628)      13,218
   taxes and fixed charges
Ratio of earnings to
   fixed charges                    2.04        2.54        1.05          1.48         0.81         0.90        (2.64)        0.08
</TABLE>


---------
(1)  Seven week period to 31 December 1999

(2)  Year ended 31 December
# C_2017063EN.01000901.xml

| 27.2.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 63/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.2.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 63/9

---

Order of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 26 October 2016 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione tributaria provinciale di Genova, Italy) — Ignazio Messina & C. SpA v Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti — Capitaneria di porto di Genova (C-10/16), Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli — Ufficio di Genova (C-11/16), Autorità portuale di Genova (C-12/16)

(Joined Cases C-10/16 to C-12/16) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 94 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Decision to refer - Insufficient information regarding the legal and factual context - Insufficient information regarding the reasons justifying the need for an answer to the questions referred for a preliminary ruling for the purposes of resolving a dispute in the main proceedings - Article 53(2) of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Manifest inadmissibility))

(2017/C 063/13)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Commissione tributaria provinciale di Genova

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Ignazio Messina & C. SpA

Applicant:

Defendants: Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti — Capitaneria di porto di Genova (C-10/16), Agenzia delle Dogane e dei Monopoli — Ufficio di Genova (C-11/16), Autorità portuale di Genova (C-12/16)

Defendants:

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

The requests for a preliminary ruling made by the Commissione tributaria provinciale di Genova (Provincial Tax Court, Genoa, Italy), by decisions of 11 December 2015, are manifestly inadmissible.

---

(1)  OJ C 111, 29.3.2016.

1

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AT MAY 2, 1998, THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS AND THE CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS EACH FOR THE THIRTEEN
WEEKS ENDED MAY 2, 1998, AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                MAY-2-1998
<CASH>                                              13
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                       21
<ALLOWANCES>                                         5
<INVENTORY>                                        202
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   291
<PP&E>                                             174
<DEPRECIATION>                                      60
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                     422
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              161
<BONDS>                                            301
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              135
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                       (219)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                       422
<SALES>                                            163
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   166
<CGS>                                               97
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       97
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                    81
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     2
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   7
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (22)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       (8)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (11)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (11)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
# C_2017213EN.01001102.xml

| 3.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 213/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 213/11

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 4 May 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation — France) — Oussama El Dakkak, Intercontinental SARL v Administration des douanes et des droits indirects

(Case C-17/16) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Regulation (EC) No 1889/2005 - Controls of cash entering or leaving the European Union - Article 3(1) - Natural person entering or leaving the European Union - Obligation to declare - International transit area of a Member State’s airport))

(2017/C 213/11)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Cour de cassation

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Oussama El Dakkak, Intercontinental SARL

Applicants:

Defendant: Administration des douanes et des droits indirects

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 3(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1889/2005 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2005 on controls of cash entering or leaving the Community must be interpreted to the effect that the obligation to declare laid down in that provision is applicable in the international transit area of an airport of a Member State.

---

(1)  OJ C 90, 7.3.2016.

1

---