76830 Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 244 / Thursday, December 19, 2013 / Notices 

purposes of certain Clean Air Act 

provisions. None of the provisions for 

which the Tribes requested eligibility 

entails the exercise of Tribal regulatory 

authority under the Clean Air Act. 

DATES: EPA’s decision approving the 

Tribes’ TAS application was issued and 

took effect on December 6, 2013. 

ADDRESSES: You may review copies of 

the Wind River TAS Decision 

Document, Attachment 1 (Legal 

Analysis of the Wind River Indian 

Reservation Boundary), Attachment 2 

(Capability Statement), and other 

supporting information at the EPA 

Region 8 Office, 1595 Wynkoop Street, 

Denver, Colorado 80202–1129. If you 

wish to review the documents in hard 

copy, EPA requests that you contact the 

individual listed below to view these 

documents. You may view the hard 

copies of these documents Monday 

through Friday, 8:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m., 

excluding Federal holidays. If you wish 

to examine these documents, you 

should make an appointment at least 24 

hours before the day of your visit. 

Additionally, these documents are 

available electronically at: http:// 

www2.epa.gov/region8/tribal-assistanceprogram. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Carl 

Daly, Air Program, U.S. Environmental 

Protection Agency, Region 8, Mailcode 

8P–AR, 1595 Wynkoop Street, Denver, 

Colorado 80202–1129, (303) 312–6416, 

daly.carl@epa.gov. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On 

December 17, 2008, as supplemented on 

December 23, 2008, the Tribes 

submitted their TAS application as 

authorized by Clean Air Act section 

301(d) (42 U.S.C. 7601(d)) and EPA’s 

regulations at 40 CFR part 49. In their 

application, the Tribes requested TAS 

eligibility for purposes of Clean Air Act 

provisions that generally relate to grant 

funding (e.g., for air quality planning 

purposes) (section 105 (42 U.S.C. 7405)); 

involvement in EPA national ambient 

air quality redesignations for the 

Reservation (section 107(d)(3) (42 U.S.C. 

7407(d)(3)); receiving notices of, 

reviewing, and/or commenting on 

certain nearby permitting and sources 

(sections 505(a)(2) (42 U.S.C. 

7661d(a)(2)) and 126 (42 U.S.C. 7426); 

receiving risk management plans of 

certain stationary sources (section 

§ 112(r)(7)(B)(iii) (42 U.S.C. 

7412(r)(7)(B)(iii)); and participation in 

certain interstate and regional air 

quality bodies (sections 169B (42 U.S.C. 

7492), 176A (42 U.S.C. 7506a) and 184 

(42 U.S.C. 7511c). None of the 

provisions for which the Tribes 

requested eligibility entails the exercise 

of Tribal regulatory authority under the 

Clean Air Act. The Tribes’ TAS 

application thus does not request, and 

EPA’s decision to approve the 

application does not approve, Tribal 

authority to implement any Clean Air 

Act regulatory programs or to otherwise 

implement Tribal regulatory authority 

under the Clean Air Act. 

In accordance with EPA’s regulations, 

as part of its review process, EPA 

notified all appropriate governmental 

entities and the public of the Tribes’ 

TAS application and in that notice 

specified the geographic boundaries of 

the Wind River Indian Reservation as 

identified in the Tribes’ application. 

EPA afforded the appropriate 

governmental entities and the public a 

period totaling 60 days to provide 

written comments regarding any dispute 

concerning the boundary of the 

Reservation. Several commenters 

disagreed with the Tribes’ Reservation 

boundary description, asserting that a 

1905 Congressional Act, 33 Stat. 1016 

(1905) (1905 Act), altered and 

diminished the Reservation boundary. 

Consistent with established TAS 

procedures, EPA afforded the Tribes an 

opportunity to respond to comments 

received by EPA on the Tribes’ 

application and has previously made all 

comments received and the Tribes’ 

responses thereto available to the 

public. In addition, because EPA was 

aware of existing disagreements 

regarding the Reservation boundary, 

EPA exercised its discretion to consult 

with the U.S. Department of the Interior 

(DOI), which has expertise on Indian 

country issues. On October 26, 2011, 

EPA received an opinion from the DOI 

Solicitor addressing the Reservation 

boundary. 

On December 4, 2013, the Tribes sent 

EPA a letter requesting that EPA not 

address at this time the lands subject to 

Section 1 of the 1953 Act, 67 Stat. 592 

(1953), and stating that the Tribes would 

notify EPA in writing if and when they 

decide to request an EPA decision with 

respect to those lands. 

EPA has carefully considered the 

application materials, the comments 

received from appropriate governmental 

entities and the public and the Tribes’ 

responses to those comments, the 

opinion of the DOI Solicitor, as well as 

other materials, relevant case law, 

applicable statutory and regulatory 

provisions, and relevant EPA guidance. 

EPA has determined that the Northern 

Arapaho and Eastern Shoshone Tribes 

have met the requirements of CAA 

§ 301(d)(2) and 40 CFR 49.6 and are 

therefore approved to be treated in a 

similar manner as a state for purposes 

of CAA §§ 105, 505(a)(2), 107(d)(3), 

112(r)(7)(B)(iii), 126, 169B, 176A, and 

184. EPA’s decision also concludes that 

the boundaries of the Reservation 

encompass and include, subject to the 

proviso below concerning the 1953 Act, 

the area set forth in the 1868 Treaty of 

Fort Bridger, 15 Stat. 673 (1868), less 

those areas conveyed by the Tribes 

under the 1874 Lander Purchase Act, 18 

Stat. 291 (1874), and the 1897 

Thermopolis Purchase Act, 30 Stat. 93 

(1897), and including certain lands 

located outside the original boundaries 

that were added to the Reservation 

under subsequent legislation in 1940, 54 

Stat. 628 (1940). With regard to the 

lands subject to Section 1 of the 1953 

Act, 67 Stat. 592 (1953), consistent with 

the Tribes’ request that EPA’s TAS 

decision not address the lands described 

in the 1953 Act at this time, the lands 

are not included in the geographic scope 

of approval for this decision. EPA’s TAS 

decision therefore does not address the 

1953 Act area. Thus, EPA approved the 

Tribes’ Application for Treatment in a 

Manner Similar to a State Under the 

Clean Air Act for Purposes of Section 

105 Grant Program, Affected State 

Status and Other Provisions for Which 

No Separate Tribal Program is Required. 

A detailed explanation of EPA’s 

approval of the Tribes’ TAS application 

is contained within the Decision 

Document and accompanying 

attachments referred to in the 

ADDRESSES section of this notice and at 

http://www2.epa.gov/region8/tribalassistance-program. 

Judicial Review: Pursuant to section 

307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act (42 U.S.C. 

7607(b)(1)), Petitioners may seek 

judicial review of this approval in the 

United States Court of Appeals for the 

Tenth Circuit. Any petition for judicial 

review shall be filed within 60 days 

from the date this notice appears in the 

Federal Register, i.e., not later than 

February 18, 2014. 

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. 

Dated: December 11, 2013. 

Howard M. Cantor, 

Acting Regional Administrator, Region 8. 

[FR Doc. 2013–30248 Filed 12–18–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6560–50–P 

EXPORT-IMPORT BANK 

[Public Notice: 2013–3006] 

Agency Information Collection 

Activities: Comment Request 

AGENCY: Export-Import Bank of the 

United States. 

ACTION: Submission for OMB review and 

comments request. 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 78, No. 244 / Thursday, December 19, 2013 / Notices 76831 

Form Title: EIB 92–50 Short-Term 

Multi-Buyer Export Credit Insurance 

Policy Applications (ST Multi-Buyer). 

SUMMARY: The Export-Import Banks of 

the United States (Ex-Im Bank), as part 

of its continuing effort to reduce 

paperwork and respondent burden, 

invites the general public and other 

Federal Agencies to comment on the 

proposed information collection, as 

required by the Paperwork Reduction 

Act of 1995. 

This collection of information is 

necessary, pursuant to 12 U.S.C. Sec. 

635(a)(1), to determine eligibility of the 

applicant for Ex-Im Bank assistance. 

The Application for Short-Term 

Multi-Buyer Export Credit Insurance 

Policy will be used to determine the 

eligibility of the applicant and the 

transaction for Export-Import Bank 

assistance under its insurance program. 

Export-Import Bank customers will be 

able to submit this form on paper or 

electronically. 

Five items have been changed on this 

form. First, the legal certifications have 

been updated to reflect a new Web site 

for performing due diligence. Second, 

two questions related to level of 

employment have been removed. Third, 

additional information about 

‘‘Affiliates’’ and ‘‘Additional Named 

Insureds’’ is being requested. Fourth, 

additional information about 

‘‘Warehouses’’ is being requested. Fifth, 

additional information about 

‘‘Exclusions’’ is being requested. The 

third, fourth and fifth changes are only 

relevant if the applicant indicates that 

they have Affiliates, use Warehouses, 

and/or require Exclusions. 

The application tool can be reviewed 

at: http://www.exim.gov/pub/pending/

Form%20EIB%2092-50.pdf 

DATES: Comments must be received on 

or before January 21, 2014 to be assured 

of consideration. 

ADDRESSES: Comments may be 

submitted electronically on 

WWW.REGULATIONS.GOV (EIB–2013– 

0047) or by mail to Office of Information 

and Regulatory Affairs, 725 17th Street, 

NW,. Washington, DC 20038 Attn: OMB 

3048–EIB92–50. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Title and Form Number: EIB 92–50 

Export-Import Bank of the United States 

Short-Term Multi-Buyer Export Credit 

Insurance Policy Applications (ST 

Multi-Buyer) 

OMB Number: 3048–0023. 

Type of Review: Regular. 

Need and Use: The Application for 

Short-Term Multi-Buyer Export Credit 

Insurance Policy will be used to 

determine the eligibility of the applicant 

and the transaction for Export-Import 

Bank assistance under its insurance 

program. 

Affected Public: This form affects 

entities involved in the export of U.S. 

goods and services. 

Annual Number of Respondents: 285. 

Estimated Time per Respondent: 0.5 

hours. 

Annual Burden Hours: 143. 

Frequency of Reporting of Use: As 

needed. 

Government Reviewing Time per 

Year: 

Reviewing Time per Year: 285 hours. 

Average Wages per Hour: $42.50. 

Average Cost per Year (time*wages): 

$12,113. 

Benefits and Overhead: 20%. 

Total Government Cost: $14,535. 

Kalesha Malloy, 

Agency Clearance Officer, Office of the Chief 

Information Officer. 

[FR Doc. 2013–30195 Filed 12–18–13; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 6690–01–P 

FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS 

COMMISSION 

Information Collection Being Reviewed 

by the Federal Communications 

Commission Under Delegated 

Authority 

AGENCY: Federal Communications 

Commission. 

ACTION: Notice and request for 

comments. 

SUMMARY: As part of its continuing effort 

to reduce paperwork burdens, and as 

required by the Paperwork Reduction 

Act (PRA) of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501– 

3520), the Federal Communications 

Commission (FCC or the Commission) 

invites the general public and other 

Federal agencies to take this 

opportunity to comment on the 

following information collection. 

Comments are requested concerning: 

whether the proposed collection of 

information is necessary for the proper 

performance of the functions of the 

Commission, including whether the 

information shall have practical utility; 

the accuracy of the Commission’s 

burden estimate; ways to enhance the 

quality, utility, and clarity of the 

information collected; ways to minimize 

the burden of the collection of 

information on the respondents, 

including the use of automated 

collection techniques or other forms of 

information technology; and ways to 

further reduce the information 

collection burden on small business 

concerns with fewer than 25 employees. 

The FCC may not conduct or sponsor 

a collection of information unless it 

displays a currently valid control 

number. No person shall be subject to 

any penalty for failing to comply with 

a collection of information subject to the 

PRA that does not display a valid Office 

of Management and Budget (OMB) 

control number. 

DATES: Written PRA comments should 

be submitted on or before February 18, 

2014. If you anticipate that you will be 

submitting comments, but find it 

difficult to do so within the period of 

time allowed by this notice, you should 

advise the contact listed below as soon 

as possible. 

ADDRESSES: Direct all PRA comments to 

Cathy Williams, FCC, via email 

PRA@fcc.gov <mailto:PRA@fcc.gov> and 

to Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov 

<mailto:Cathy.Williams@fcc.gov>. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For 

additional information about the 

information collection, contact Cathy 

Williams at (202) 418–2918. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

OMB Control Number: 3060–0473. 

Title: Section 74.1251, Technical and 

Equipment Modifications. 

Type of Review: Extension of a 

currently approved collection. 

Respondents: Businesses or other forprofit entities; not-for-profit institutions. 

Number of Respondents and 

Responses: 100 respondents; 300 

responses. 

Estimated Time per Response: 0.25 

hour. 

Frequency of Response: 

Recordkeeping requirement; One-time 

reporting requirement. 

Obligation to Respond: Required to 

obtain or retain benefits. The statutory 

authority for this collection is contain in 

Sections 154(i) and 325(a) of the 

Communications Act of 1934, as 

amended. 

Total Annual Burden: 75 hours. 

Total Annual Cost: None. 

Privacy Act Impact Assessment: No 

impact(s). 

Nature and Extent of Confidentiality: 

There is no need for confidentiality with 

this collection of information. 

Needs and Uses: 47 CFR 74.1251(b)(1) 

states that formal application on FCC 

Form 349 is required of all permittees 

and licensees for any of the following 

changes: Replacement of the transmitter 

as a whole, except replacement with a 

transmitter of identical power rating 

which has been certificated by the FCC 

for use by FM translator or FM booster 

stations, or any change which could 

result in the electrical characteristics or 

performance of the station. Upon the 

installation or modification of the 

transmitting equipment for which prior 

FCC authority is not required under the 


emcdonald on DSK67QTVN1PROD with NOTICES