alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2****CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)**I, Christine A. Herren, certify that:1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Innotrac Corporation; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in thisreport; 4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material informationrelating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us byothers within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal controlover financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’sauditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affectthe registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.       Date: August 14, 2006  /s/ Christine A. Herren Christine A. Herren      Senior Director and Controller (PrincipalFinancial Officer and Principal AccountingOfficer)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

GORDON and JESSIE CASTO :

: CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-CV-4228

Plaintiffs, :

:

v. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION;

BAYER AG;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE;

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM

:

:

:

:

:

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

:

Defendants. :

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of the Court:

Kindly enter the appearances of Hope S. Freiwald, Aline Fairweather, Erin

Brennan and Kirstin J. Miller as attorneys for defendant SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a

GlaxoSmithKline.

Respectfully Submitted,

_____________________________ _____________________________

Hope S. Freiwald Aline Fairweather

_____________________________ _____________________________

Erin Brennan Kirstin J. Miller

DECHERT PRICE & RHOADS

4000 Bell Atlantic Tower

1717 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2793

(215) 994-4000

Case 2:02-cv-04228-RB Document 6 Filed 09/16/2002 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 99.11

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Enerplus Resources Fund (the "Fund") on Form 40-F for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert J. Waters, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
EnerMark Inc., on behalf of the Fund, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

/s/ ROBERT J. WATERS Robert J. Waters Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of EnerMark Inc.


March 13,
2009

The foregoing certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such
certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it
by reference.

---



QuickLinks
EXHIBIT (10.9(ii))

AMENDMENT NO. 1 
TO THE 
ECOLAB MIRROR PENSION PLAN 
(As Amended and Restated effective as of January 1, 2014)
WHEREAS, Ecolab Inc. (the “Company”) has established and currently maintains the Ecolab Mirror Pension Plan (As Amended and Restated effective as of January 1, 2014) (the “Plan”); and
WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan to timely reflect proposed regulations under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to Section 5.1 of the Ecolab Inc. Administrative Document for Non-Qualified Benefit Plans (the “Administrative Document”) and subject to Section 6.1 of the Plan, the Company hereby amends the Plan as set forth below. Words used herein with initial capital letters that are defined in the Plan or the Administrative Document are used herein as so defined.
Section 3.2(e) is amended effective December 31, 2020, by adding the following sentence to the end thereof:
“Notwithstanding the foregoing, this Section 3.2(e) shall no longer apply effective December 31, 2020 to the extent this Section 3.2(e) is inconsistent with any proposed or final regulations issued under Code Section 162(m) or Code Section 409A and on which regulations the Company may reasonably rely as of the date of any potential application of this Section 3.2(e).”  
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Ecolab Inc. has executed this Amendment No. 2 this 2nd day of December, 2020.
​
	​


	​


	​


	


	​
	​
	​
	ECOLAB INC.

	​
	​
	​
	​

	​
	​
	​
	​

	​
	​
	​
	/s/ Laurie M. Marsh

	​
	​
	​
	Laurie M. Marsh

	​
	​
	​
	Executive Vice President, Human Resources

	​
	​
	​
	​

	​
	​
	​
	​

	ATTEST:
	​
	​
	​

	​
	​
	​
	​

	​
	​
	​
	​

	/s/ Michael C. McCormick
	​
	​
	​

	Michael C. McCormick
	​
	​
	​

	Secretary
	​
	​
	​



​

​
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

FRANCOISE and WILLIAM COLLINS :

: CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-CV-4230

Plaintiffs, :

:

v. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION;

BAYER AG;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE;

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM

:

:

:

:

:

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

:

Defendants. :

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of the Court:

Kindly enter the appearances of Hope S. Freiwald, Aline Fairweather, Erin

Brennan and Kirstin J. Miller as attorneys for defendant SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a

GlaxoSmithKline.

Respectfully Submitted,

_____________________________ _____________________________

Hope S. Freiwald Aline Fairweather

_____________________________ _____________________________

Erin Brennan Kirstin J. Miller

DECHERT PRICE & RHOADS

4000 Bell Atlantic Tower

1717 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2793

(215) 994-4000

Case 2:02-cv-04230-JP Document 8 Filed 09/20/2002 Page 1 of 1
SF-00006-05 (4/86) DEPARTMENT: 

### POLLUTION CONTROL AGENCY STATE OF MINNESOTA Office Memorandum

DATE: March 8, 2012

TO: AQD File No. 869A (Delta ID No. 13700113)

FROM: Hongming Jiang Catherine Neuschler Air Quality Permits Section Air Assessment and Environmenta l Data Management Section
Industrial Division Environmental Analysis and Outcomes Division

PHONE: 651-757-2467 651-757-2607

SUBJECT: 

### BART Limits for United Taconite (UTac)

This memo was prepared to provide the documentation of the MPCA’s NO X BART limit determination based on the technical review performed by MPCA staff. EPA’s approval of the Regional Haze State Implementation Plan (SIP) for
Minnesota is needed for the MPCA’s BART determination to become effective.

1. General Information

1.1 Applicant and Stationary Source Location:

Applicant/Mailing Address Stationary Source (SIC: 1011 )/Address

United Taconite LLC – Fairlane Plant

P.O. Box 180 Eveleth, Minnesota 55734-0180 Highway 16 Forbes, Minnesota 55738 St. Louis County Contact: Ms. Candice Maxwell; Phone: (218) 744-7849

1.2 Description of the Facility

The United Taconite, LLC (UTac) facility processes crude taconi te ore into a pellet product with ore supplied from a raillinked facility, UTac’s Thunderbird Mine. Fine crushing and grinding of crude ore and magnetic separation processes produce a taconite concentrate, which is used to make pelle ts. Taconite pellets are thermally hardened in a grate-kiln indurating furnace. The finished product (fired pellets) is transferred by conveyors to storage bins for holding and loading into railcars.

This facility has two indurating Allis-Chalmers furnaces. Line 1 is the smaller of the two, with a rated throughput of 280 tons of pellets per hour and a heat input of 190 MMBtu per hour of natural gas. The newer line, Li ne 2, is rated at 672 tons per hour with a heat input from natural gas, coal, petroleum coke, and other fuels of 400 MMBtu per hour.

2. Regulatory and/or Statutory Basis

2.1 Overview of Visibility, Regional Haze, and Best Available Retrofit Technology Program

The U.S. EPA’s 1999 Regional Haze Rule singles out certain ol der emission sources that have not been regulated under other provisions of the Clean Air Act for additional controls . The MPCA is required to determine Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART) for these ol der sources that contribute to visibility impa irment in Class I Areas to install Best Available Retrofit Technology (BART). On July 6, 2005, U.S. EPA publishe d a revised final rule, including 40 CFR 51, Appendix Y “Guidelines for BART Determinations Under the Regional Haze Rule” which provides direction for determining which older sources may need to install BART and for determining BART.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

 

:

ANTHONY BARBEE, : CIVIL ACTION

:

Plaintiff, :

:

v. :

:

SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA, :

TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY : No. 04-5541

:

Defendants. :

 :

O R D E R

 

AND NOW, this 12th day of October, 2005, after a telephone conference with the

parties, it is ORDERED that a deposition shall be taken of Plaintiff Anthony Barbee at 10:00

a.m., on Friday, October 21, 2005, at counsel for Defendant Mr. Andrew J. DeFalco’s office,

located at: Stradley Ronon Stevens & Young, LLP, 2600 One Commerce Square, Philadelphia,

PA 19103. Within five (5) days of the Barbee deposition, Mr. DeFalco will advise the Court by

letter of any additional discovery he needs. Counsel for Defendant shall submit an affidavit as to

additional attorney’s fees incurred as result of Plaintiff Counsel’s failure to respond to prior

discovery requests. 

BY THE COURT:

 /s/ Robert F. Kelly 

Robert F. Kelly, Sr. J. 

Case 2:04-cv-04063-RK Document 15 Filed 10/12/05 Page 1 of 1
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS4675 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
No. 57168.

protests 150715-K (B), etc. (New York).

#### G. Abramovitch and Schneider Bros. & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the kidskin plates are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Kung Chen Fur Corpn.*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Ford, J., concurred.

Mollison, J., dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1480, *supra.*
##### 



Exhibit 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the EnergySouth, Inc. (the Company) Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, John S. Davis,
Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that, to the best of my knowledge:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. Date: May 17, 2004
    By:
    /s/ John S. DavisJohn S. DavisPresident and
Chief Executive Officer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001051114
<NAME> INNOTRAC CORP
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         274,000
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               74,883,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,870,000
<INVENTORY>                                 19,834,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            97,834,000
<PP&E>                                      13,450,000
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,226,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             105,166,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       67,457,000
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    25,738,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  11,842,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               105,166,000
<SALES>                                     67,320,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            67,320,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               58,717,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             2,819,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               685,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             373,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,430,000
<INCOME-TAX>                                 2,145,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,286,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,286,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.36
        

</TABLE>
# C_2016038EN.01007201.xml

| 1.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/72 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/72

---

Action brought on 25 November 2015 — Stock Polska v OHIM- Lass & Steffen (LUBELSKA)

(Case T-701/15)

(2016/C 038/97)

Language in which the application was lodged: Polish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Stock Polska Sp. z o.o. (Warsaw, Poland) (represented by: T. Gawrylczyk, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Lass & Steffen GmbH Wein- und Spirituosen-Import (Lübeck, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Party applying for the trade mark at issue: the applicant

Party applying for the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word element ‘LUBELSKA’ — Application No 11 657 459

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before OHIM:

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 24 September 2015 in Case R 1788/2014-5

Contested decision:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Breach of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Breach of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
**Exhibit 32.2**

**Chief Financial Officer Certification**

Inconnection with General Maritime Corporation’s (the “Company”) annual report onForm 10-K for the three months and fiscal year ending December 31, 2006, asfiled with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),the undersigned Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifiespursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)          The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

(2)          The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 
|        | Date: March 1, 2007 |   | /s/ Jeffrey D. Pribor |                                       |
|--------|---------------------|--------|-----------------------|--------------------------------------------|
|   |                | Name:  |                  | Jeffrey D. Pribor                          |
|   |                | Title: |                  | Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|        |                     |        |                       |                                            |  |  |

 

Theforegoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosuredocument.

----
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**391 KA 11-00882**  PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., FAHEY, PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, AND WHALEN, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ALONZO MADISON, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 3.)

THOMAS E. ANDRUSCHAT, EAST AURORA, FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
FRANK A. SEDITA, III, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, BUFFALO (DAVID A. HERATY OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Deborah A. Haendiges, J.), rendered February 10, 2011. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a nonjury verdict, of assault in the third degree and harassment in the second degree.
It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Same Memorandum as in People v Madison ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [May 3, 2013]).

Entered: May 3, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Document

Exhibit 10.19


AMENDMENT NO. 3
TO
EQUIFAX 2005 EXECUTIVE DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN
(As Amended and Restated Effective as of January 1, 2015)




THIS AMENDMENT made as of this 4th day of November, 2020, by EQUIFAX INC. (the “Company”);


W I T N E S S E T H:


WHEREAS, the Company maintains the Equifax 2005 Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, which plan was amended and restated effective as of January 1, 2015, and as further amended on June 30, 2016 and February 16, 2018 (the “Plan”);


WHEREAS, the Company now desires to amend the Plan to revise the definition of “Retirement Eligibility Date” under the Plan for employees hired on or after January 1, 2021;


NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:


1.


Section 1.22 is deleted in its entirety and the following substituted therefor:


“1.22    Retirement Eligibility Date shall mean: (i) for Participants who commenced employment prior to January 1, 2021, the date on which the Participant has both attained age fifty-five (55) and completed at least five (5) Years of Vesting Service; (ii) for Participants who commenced employment on or after January 1, 2021, the date on which the Participant has both attained age sixty (60) and completed at least five (5) Years of Vesting Service; and (iii) for all Participants on or after attainment of age sixty-five (65).”


2.


This Amendment No. 3 shall be effective as of November 4, 2020. Except as hereby modified, the Plan shall remain in full force and effective.




[Signature page follows.]




1






IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has executed this Amendment No. 3 as of the date first written above.


EQUIFAX INC.


By:    /s/ Carla J. Chaney                                         
Name:    Carla J. Chaney
Title:     Corporate Vice President and 
    Chief Human Resources Officer




2
# C_2016270EN.01001301.xml

| 25.7.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 270/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.7.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 270/13

---

Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 April 2016 — (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Frosinone — Italy) — Criminal proceedings against Paola Tonachella

(Case C-8/16) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Article 99 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court - Identical questions referred for a preliminary ruling - Articles 49 and 56 TFEU - Freedom of establishment - Freedom to provide services - Betting and gaming - National legislation - Reorganisation of the licensing system through the alignment of licence expiry dates - New call for tenders - Licences for a shorter term than that of the former licences - Transfer, free of charge, of the rights to use tangible and intangible assets owned constituting the network for the management and collection of bets - Restriction - Overriding reasons in the public interest - Proportionality))

(2016/C 270/16)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunale di Frosinone

Criminal proceedings against

Criminal proceedings against

Paola Tonachella

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

Articles 49 TFEU and 56 TFEU must be interpreted as precluding a restrictive national provision, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which requires a licensee of a betting and gambling service to transfer, free of charge, on the cessation of business as a result of the expiry of the final term of the licence, the rights to use tangible and intangible assets which he owns and which constitute his network for the management and collection of bets, in so far as that restriction goes beyond what is necessary to attain the objective actually pursued by that provision, which is for the referring court to verify.

---

(1)  OJ C 90, 7.3.2016.

1

---
No. 60415.

protest 253187-K (New York).

#### Sandoz Chemical Works, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of Axelan, which product is not obtained from any oil, fat, or fatty acid, but is derived from castor oil, which is not covered by the statute, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.