alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
United States Court of Appeals 

For the First Circuit 

Nos. 15-1466 

 15-1533 

BERARDO A. QUILEZ-VELAR; MARTA BONELLI-CABAN; 

BERARDO A. QUILEZ-BONELLI; CARLOS A. QUILEZ-BONELLI, 

Plaintiffs, Appellants/Cross-Appellees, 

v. 

OX BODIES, INC., 

Defendant, Appellee/Cross-Appellant. 

ERRATA SHEET

 The opinion of this Court issued on May 9, 2016, is amended 

as follows: 

 On page 11, line 2, "alteration" is changed to "alterations". 

 On page 20, line 14, "up to the" is changed to "up to".
# 2014_06 MTS Pivot Table 4

# 2014_06 MTS Table 4 Detail

&F	

&P/&N
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PABLO ESPINOZA CORNELIO, 

Petitioner, 

 v. 

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney 

General, 

Respondent.

No. 14-72258 

Agency No. A092-203-262 

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 17, 2021**

Before: SILVERMAN, CHRISTEN, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

Pablo Espinoza Cornelio, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for 

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order dismissing his appeal from an 

immigration judge’s decision denying his application for cancellation of removal. 

We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law. 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

AUG 26 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 14-72258 

Coronado v. Holder, 759 F.3d 977, 982 (9th Cir. 2014). We deny the petition for 

review.

The agency properly denied cancellation of removal, where Espinoza 

Cornelio failed to meet his burden of proof to establish that his conviction under 

California Health & Safety Code section 11360(a) does not constitute an 

aggravated felony drug trafficking offense that renders him ineligible for 

cancellation of removal. See 8 U.S.C. §§ 1101(a)(43)(B), 1229b(a)(3); Pereida v. 

Wilkinson, 141 S. Ct. 754, 766 (2021) (an inconclusive conviction record is 

insufficient to meet applicant’s burden of proof to show eligibility for relief).

The stay of removal remains in place until issuance of the mandate.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
# C_2015107EN.01003301.xml

| 30.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 107/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 107/33

---

Action brought on 28 January 2015 — credentis v OHIM — Aldi Karlslunde (Curodont)

(Case T-53/15)

(2015/C 107/43)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: credentis AG (Windisch, Switzerland) (represented by: D. Breuer, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Aldi Karlslunde K/S (Karlslunde, Denmark)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Applicant: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘Curodont’ — Application for registration No 10 332 807

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 13 November 2014 in Case R 353/2014-1

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the contested decision;

| — | Order OHIM and Aldi Karlslunde to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM and Aldi Karlslunde to pay the costs.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
No. 63557.

protests 58/23298, etc. (Los Angeles).

#### 20th Century Fox Film Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, O. J.

The protests were dismissed.
Before the Second Division,

March 31, 1955

No. 58889.

protests 234606-K, etc. (New York).

#### General Materials Co. and Schmidt Pritchard & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of aluminum alloy rods similar *in*all material respects to those the subject of *Mohawk Iron & Steel Co.*v. *United States*(30 Cust. Ct. 274, C. D. 1533), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 64741.

#### Schenley International Corp. *v.*United States,

protests 45022-K, *etc.*(Seattle).

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 125 (Friday, June 28, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 39057]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-15551]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice 8362]

In the Matter of the Designation of Eric Breininger as a 
Specially Designated Global Terrorist Pursuant To Section 1(b) of 
Executive Order 13224, as Amended

    In accordance with section 1(b) of Executive Order 13224 of 
September 23, 2001, as amended (``the Order''), I hereby determine that 
the individual known as Eric Breininger, also known as Abdul-Gaffar, 
also known as Abdulgaffar el Almani, no longer meets the criteria for 
designation under the Order, and therefore I hereby revoke the 
designation of the aforementioned individual as a Specially Designated 
Global Terrorist pursuant to section 1(b) of the Order.
    This notice shall be published in the Federal Register.

     Dated: June 19, 2013.
John F. Kerry,
Secretary of State.
[FR Doc. 2013-15551 Filed 6-27-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-10-P
```
# C_2018032EN.01000601.xml

| 29.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 32/6 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 32/6

---

Order of the Court (Third Chamber) of 15 November 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hanseatisches Oberlandesgericht in Bremen — Germany) — Execution of European arrest warrants issued against Pál Aranyosi

(Case C-496/16) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters - Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA - European arrest warrant - Grounds for refusal to execute - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Article 4 - Prohibition of inhuman or degrading treatment - Conditions of detention in the issuing Member State - Annulment of the European arrest warrant by the issuing judicial authority - Hypothetical question - No need to adjudicate))

(2018/C 032/08)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Referring court

Hanseatisches Oberlandesgericht in Bremen

Party to the main proceedings

Party to the main proceedings

Pál Aranyosi

Operative part of the order

Operative part of the order

There is no need to proceed to judgment on the request for a preliminary ruling made by the Hanseatisches Oberlandesgericht in Bremen (Higher Regional Court, Bremen, Germany) by decision of 12 September 2016.

---

(1)  OJ C 475, 19.12.2016

1

---
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-10196

Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

RAUL RAFAEL MORALES-SANCHEZ, also known as Anthony C. Jaramillo,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:13-CR-50-1

Before JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The Federal Public Defender appointed to represent Raul Rafael 

Morales-Sanchez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in 

accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States 

v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Morales-Sanchez has filed a response.

The record is not sufficiently developed to allow us to make a fair evaluation of 

Morales-Sanchez’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel; we therefore 

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not 

be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH 

CIR. R. 47.5.4.

United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit

FILED

March 16, 2015

Lyle W. Cayce

Clerk

 

 Case: 14-10196 Document: 00512969977 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/16/2015
No. 14-10196

decline to consider the claim without prejudice to collateral review. See United 

States v. Isgar, 739 F.3d 829, 841 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 135 S. Ct. 123 (2014). 

We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record 

reflected therein, as well as Morales-Sanchez’s response. We concur with 

counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for 

appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is 

GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the 

APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

2

 Case: 14-10196 Document: 00512969977 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/16/2015
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 215 (Wednesday, November 8, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 77135]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-24653]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF STATE

[Public Notice: 12258]


Notice of Determinations; Culturally Significant Object Being 
Imported for Exhibition--Determinations: ``Reclaiming El Camino: Native 
Resistance in the Missions and Beyond'' Exhibition

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: I 
hereby determine that a certain object being imported from abroad 
pursuant to an agreement with its foreign owner or custodian for 
temporary display in the exhibition ``Reclaiming El Camino: Native 
Resistance in the Missions and Beyond'' at the Autry Museum of the 
American West, Los Angeles, California, and at possible additional 
exhibitions or venues yet to be determined, is of cultural 
significance, and, further, that its temporary exhibition or display 
within the United States as aforementioned is in the national interest. 
I have ordered that Public Notice of these determinations be published 
in the Federal Register.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Reed Liriano, Program Coordinator, 
Office of the Legal Adviser, U.S. Department of State (telephone: 202-
632-6471; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#35465056415c5a5b0701000c7546415441501b525a43"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7c0f191f081513124e4849453c0f081d0819521b130a">[email protected]</span></a>). The mailing address is U.S. 
Department of State, L/PD, 2200 C Street NW (SA-5), Suite 5H03, 
Washington, DC 20522-0505.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The foregoing determinations were made 
pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 
(79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 
1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 
Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of 
Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, Delegation of Authority No. 236-3 
of August 28, 2000, and Delegation of Authority No. 523 of December 22, 
2021.

Nicole L. Elkon,
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Professional and Cultural Exchanges, 
Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs, Department of State.
[FR Doc. 2023-24653 Filed 11-7-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4710-05-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
# C_2016048EN.01008301.xml

| 8.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 48/83 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 48/83

---

Action brought on 29 November 2015 — Marcas Costa Brava/OHMI — Excellent Brands JMI (Cremcaffé by Julius Meinl)

(Case T-687/15)

(2016/C 048/91)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Marcas Costa Brava, SL (Sils, Spain) (represented by: E. Manresa Medina and J. Manresa Medina, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Excellent Brands JMI Ltd (Baar, Switzerland)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings the Board of Appeal before

Applicant of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark in red and white colours containing the word elements ‘Cremcaffé by Julius Meinl’ — Community trade mark No 11 406 816

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before OHIM

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 29 September 2015 in Case R 2757/2014-5

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | consider proved the use of the Community Trademark No 2 423 705 Class 30 deemed and the Community Trademark application No 11 406 816 is incompatible with the Community Trademark No 2 423 705; |
| --- | --- |

—

consider proved the use of the Community Trademark No 2 423 705 Class 30 deemed and the Community Trademark application No 11 406 816 is incompatible with the Community Trademark No 2 423 705;

| — | order OHIM and possible co-defendants to pay all costs of the procedure. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM and possible co-defendants to pay all costs of the procedure.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Erroneous interpretation of Article 15(1), 15(1)(a) and Article 8(1)(b) CTMR. |
| --- | --- |

—

Erroneous interpretation of Article 15(1), 15(1)(a) and Article 8(1)(b) CTMR.

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of GMX Resources Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with
the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
the Company.



|                        |  |  |  |                        
|----------------------- |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: September 1, 2011 |  |  |  | /s/ James A. Merrill   
|                        |  |  |  | James A. Merrill       
|                        |  |  |  | Chief Financial Officer
UN PUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18
- 6853

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v. AARON JUAREZ

- GOMEZ , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina , at Raleigh

. James C. Dever III, Chief District Judge. ( 5:11

- cr - 00375

- D

- 1 )

Submitted : September 18, 2018 Decided: September 21, 2018

Before WILKINSON and THACKER , Circuit Judges , and TRAXLER, Senior Circuit Judge

.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.

Aaron Juarez

- Gomez , Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Aaron Juarez

- Gomez appeals the district court’s order denying hi s motions for reduction of sentence , confining his appeal to the court’s denial of his motion seeking a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reaso ns stated by the district
court. United States v. Juarez

- Gomez , No. 5:11

- cr - 00375

- D

- 1 (E.D.N.C. Ju ly 11 , 2018)

. We deny Juarez

- Gomez ’s motion s to appoint counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
# C_2015414EN.01003301.xml

| 14.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 414/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 414/33

---

Action brought on 30 September 2015 — Azur Space Solar Power v OHIM (Representation of a solar cell)

(Case T-578/15)

(2015/C 414/43)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Azur Space Solar Power GmbH (Heilbronn, Germany) (represented by: J. Nicodemus, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of a figurative mark (Representation of a solar cell) — International registration No 1 201 973

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 27 July 2015 in Case R 2780/2014-4

Contested decision

Forms of order sought

Forms of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the refusal of OHIM; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the refusal of OHIM;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
# C_2015236EN.01004401.xml

| 20.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 236/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 236/44

---

Action brought on 15 May 2015 — Cryo-Save v OHIM — MedSkin Solutions Dr. Suwelack (Cryo-Save)

(Case T-239/15)

(2015/C 236/59)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Cryo-Save AG (Freienbach, Switzerland) (represented by: C. Onken, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: MedSkin Solutions Dr. Suwelack AG (Billerbeck, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘Cryo-Save’ — Community trade mark No 4 625 216

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Cancellation proceedings

Procedure before OHIM

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 March 2015 in Case R 2567/2013-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | alter the contested decision to the effect that the decision of the Cancellation Division of 30 October 2013 is annulled and the application for revocation of Community trade mark No 4 625 216 is rejected;
  in the alternative: annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

alter the contested decision to the effect that the decision of the Cancellation Division of 30 October 2013 is annulled and the application for revocation of Community trade mark No 4 625 216 is rejected;

in the alternative: annul the contested decision;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 56(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 in conjunction with Rule 37(b)(iv) of Regulation No 2868/95; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 56(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 in conjunction with Rule 37(b)(iv) of Regulation No 2868/95;

| — | Infringement of Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATION**PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENT SET FORTH IN RULE 13A-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF1934, AS AMENDED, AND SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE (18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350), MICHAEL D. PERRY, SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF VITRIATECHNOLOGY, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION (THE “COMPANY”) HEREBY CERTIFIES THAT, TO THE BEST OF HISKNOWLEDGE, AS FOLLOWS:     The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2005, to whichthis Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the “PERIODIC REPORT”), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that theinformation contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of this 4th day of November,2005.       /s/ Michael D. Perry         Michael D. Perry    Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer       **A signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-****14(b)****of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United StatesCode (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), has been provided to Vitria Technology, Inc. and will be retained byVitria Technology, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest. This certification accompanies the****Form 10-Q****to which it relates, is not deemed filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filingof Vitria Technology, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the****Form 10-Q****), irrespective ofany general incorporation language contained in such filing.**
Payment Collection RIA SIA Zero Dollar Total

August 2015 28,528 85,645 2,621 128 2 116,924

September 2015 34,426 110,208 3,532 206 - 148,372

October 2015 22,178 73,648 2,697 260 - 98,783

Totals 85,132 269,501 8,850 594 2 364,079

 -

 50,000

 100,000

 150,000

 200,000

 250,000

 300,000

 350,000

 400,000

# of transactions

Transaction Type

IPAC Transaction Count

August 2015

September 2015

October 2015

Totals
No. 54541.

#### Star Liquor Dealers, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 153390-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 ¡the court dismissed the protest.