alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 2:04-cv-00766-PBT Document 1 Filed 02/23/04 Page 1 of 30
Case 2:04-cv-00766-PBT Document 1 Filed 02/23/04 Page 2 of 30
Case 2:04-cv-00766-PBT Document 1 Filed 02/23/04 Page 3 of 30
Case 2:04-cv-00766-PBT Document 1 Filed 02/23/04 Page 4 of 30
Case 2:04-cv-00766-PBT Document 1 Filed 02/23/04 Page 5 of 30
Case 2:04-cv-00766-PBT Document 1 Filed 02/23/04 Page 6 of 30
Case 2:04-cv-00766-PBT Document 1 Filed 02/23/04 Page 7 of 30
Case 2:04-cv-00766-PBT Document 1 Filed 02/23/04 Page 8 of 30
Case 2:04-cv-00766-PBT Document 1 Filed 02/23/04 Page 9 of 30
Case 2:04-cv-00766-PBT Document 1 Filed 02/23/04 Page 10 of 30
Case 2:04-cv-00766-PBT Document 1 Filed 02/23/04 Page 11 of 30
Case 2:04-cv-00766-PBT Document 1 Filed 02/23/04 Page 12 of 30
Case 2:04-cv-00766-PBT Document 1 Filed 02/23/04 Page 13 of 30
Case 2:04-cv-00766-PBT Document 1 Filed 02/23/04 Page 14 of 30
Case 2:04-cv-00766-PBT Document 1 Filed 02/23/04 Page 15 of 30
Case 2:04-cv-00766-PBT Document 1 Filed 02/23/04 Page 16 of 30
Case 2:04-cv-00766-PBT Document 1 Filed 02/23/04 Page 17 of 30
Case 2:04-cv-00766-PBT Document 1 Filed 02/23/04 Page 18 of 30
Case 2:04-cv-00766-PBT Document 1 Filed 02/23/04 Page 19 of 30
Case 2:04-cv-00766-PBT Document 1 Filed 02/23/04 Page 20 of 30
Case 2:04-cv-00766-PBT Document 1 Filed 02/23/04 Page 21 of 30
Case 2:04-cv-00766-PBT Document 1 Filed 02/23/04 Page 22 of 30
Case 2:04-cv-00766-PBT Document 1 Filed 02/23/04 Page 23 of 30
Case 2:04-cv-00766-PBT Document 1 Filed 02/23/04 Page 24 of 30
Case 2:04-cv-00766-PBT Document 1 Filed 02/23/04 Page 25 of 30
Case 2:04-cv-00766-PBT Document 1 Filed 02/23/04 Page 26 of 30
Case 2:04-cv-00766-PBT Document 1 Filed 02/23/04 Page 27 of 30
Case 2:04-cv-00766-PBT Document 1 Filed 02/23/04 Page 28 of 30
Case 2:04-cv-00766-PBT Document 1 Filed 02/23/04 Page 29 of 30
Case 2:04-cv-00766-PBT Document 1 Filed 02/23/04 Page 30 of 30
EXHIBIT 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS

February 26, 2009

GMX Resources Inc.

One Benham Place, Suite 600

9400 North Broadway

Oklahoma City, OK 73114

Re: Consent of Independent Petroleum Engineers

To whom it may concern:

MHA Petroleum Consultants hereby consents to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-106311, 333-150356 and
333-151916) on Form S-8 of GMX Resources Inc. and registration statements (333-134911 and 333-149170, 333-150359 and 333-150368) on Form S-3 of the references to our report relating to the proved oil and natural gas reserves of GMX Resources Inc.
for the year ended December 31, 2008, and to the reference to our firm as experts in such registration statements with respect to such report.

Very
truly yours,



|                                |  |                                   
|------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------
|MHA PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS, INC.
|                                | 
|By:                             |  | /s/ John Arsenault, Vice President
|                                |  | John Arsenault, Vice President
No. 49540.

#### Protest 967811-G of Bullocks, Inc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

When this case was called for trial it was stipulated that the soap consisted of 18 percent coconut oil (122% pounds); 9.85 percent palm oil (67% pounds); and 59 percent tallow (402% pounds). In accordance therewith and on the authority of *Emporium-Capwell*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 179, C. D. 318), which record was incorporated herein, the court directed that the tax be taken at the-rates per pound equal to the proportions of the rate or rates prescribed in section 602% of the Revenue Act of 1934, as amended by section 702 of the Revenue Act of 1936, and section 601(c) (8) of the Revenue Act of 1932, as amended by section 701 of the Revenue Act of 1936, in respect to palm oil, coconut oil, and tallow, which the quantities by weight of such oils and tallow bear to the total weight of the imported article.
Frank Brett, Plaintiff,
v. Mayor Fenty et aI., Defendants. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) ) ) ) ) Civil Action No. ) ) ) )

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

# FILED DEC 23 2009 Clerk, U.S. District and Bankruptcy Courts

This matter is before the Court on its initial review ofplaintiffs pro se complaint and application for leave to proceed informapauperis. The Court will grant the informapauperis application and dismiss the case because the complaint fails to meet the minimal pleading requirements ofRule 8(a) ofthe Federal Rules ofCivil Procedure. Pro se litigants must comply with the Federal Rules ofCivil Procedure. Jarrell v. Tisch, 656 F. Supp. 237,239 (D.D.C. 1987). Rule 8(a) ofthe Federal Rules ofCivil Procedure requires complaints to contain" (1) a short and plain statement ofthe grounds for the court'sjurisdiction [and] (2) a short and plain statement ofthe claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief." Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S.Ct. 1937, 1950 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). The Rule 8 standard ensures that defendants receive fair notice ofthe claim being asserted so that they can prepare a responsive answer and an adequate defense and determine whether the doctrine ofresjudicata applies. Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). 

# 3Plaintiff, a resident ofBaltimore, Maryland, sues District ofColumbia Mayor Adrian Fenty, the Library ofCongress and a librarian there who he claims "gave [him] the run around" when he requested her assistance. Plaintiffalleges that Mayor Fenty "slandered" him and "tried to steal [his] civil rights" but in what way is unknown because plaintiffhas not stated any supporting facts. The complaint is mostly incomprehensible and, thus, fails to provide any notice ofa claim or the basis for federal courtjurisdiction. order accompanies this Memorandum Opinio**~**..........-....,",,' Ibe dismissed. A separate

Date: Decembef-1-, 2009 United States District Judge

2
EXHIBIT 10.2

                              Golf rounds.com, inc.
                               111 village parkway
                                   building #2
                             Marietta, Georgia 30067




                                                         As of September 1, 2003



George N. Faris
33 Twin Lakes Lane
Riverside, Connecticut 06878

David Nagelberg
18475 Lago Vista
Rancho Sante Fe, CA  92067

Ronald I. Heller
74 Farview Road
Tenafly, NJ  07670

Gentlemen:

     This is to confirm our agreement  whereby George N. Faris,  David Nagelberg
and Ronald I. Heller have agreed to provide, and have provided, certain services
to Golf  Rounds.com,  Inc.  ("Company"),  including the  introduction  of Direct
Petroleum  Exploration,  Inc, ("DPE"),  to the Company as a potential target for
acquisition via merger as outlined in the letter of intent, dated August 6, 2003
("Merger").  For these services, the Company has agreed to pay to Messrs. Faris,
Nagelberg  and  Heller,  as  individuals,  a certain  finder's  fee as set forth
herein.

     If, at any time within the 24-month period  following the date hereof,  the
Company and DPE complete the Merger,  the Company,  at the effective time of the
Merger, shall pay a finders fee ("Fee") to Messrs.  Faris,  Nagelberg and Heller
(collectively,  the  "Finders").  50% of such Fee shall be paid to Mr. Faris and
the remaining 50% shall be paid equally to Messrs. Nagelberg and Heller. The Fee
shall be paid by issuing to the three of them, in the aggregate,  that number of
shares ("Fee Shares") of the Company's common stock equal to 5% of the Company's
common stock  outstanding  immediately  after the Merger  (giving  effect to the
issuance of the Fee Shares and the shares of the  Company's  common stock issued
to the  shareholders  of DPE in exchange for their shares of DPE common stock in
the Merger, but not to any of the Company's outstanding options or warrants).

<PAGE>

     If the foregoing correctly reflects the understanding by and among the
parties, please sign below and return this letter to us, at which time it will
become a binding agreement with respect to the subject matter hereof.

                                GOLF ROUNDS.COM, INC.


                                By: /s/ Robert H. Donehew
                                   ______________________
                                Name: Robert H. Donehew
                                Title:    President



Agreed to and accepted as of the date above written:

/s/ George N. Faris
---------------------
George N. Faris

/s/ David Nagelberg
---------------------
David Nagelberg

/s/ Ronald I. Heller
-----------------------
Ronald I. Heller



                                       2
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-22-00212-CV

In re Karen McAndrews

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING FROM BELL COUNTY

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

The petition for writ of mandamus is denied. See Tex. R. App. P. 52.8(a).

__________________________________________

Chari L. Kelly, Justice

Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Kelly and Smith

Filed: April 20, 2022
|EXHIBIT 32.2
|------------

CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,



|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
|-------------------------------------------------------------------

The undersigned hereby certifies in her capacity as Chief Financial Officer of Belair Capital Fund LLC (the Fund), that based on her knowledge:

|(a) | the Quarterly Report of the Fund on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended; and
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Fund for such period.                                            
|   



|Date: November 9, 2005
|----------------------



| | /s/ Michelle A. GreenMichelle A. GreenChief Financial Officer
| | -------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request.

---
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Virage Logic Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Christine Russell, Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, does hereby certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officers knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company as of and for the dates presented.



|                                                                   
|-------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Christine Russell                                              
|Christine Russell                                                  
|Chief Financial Officer(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
|May 12, 2008
April 23, 2014

Mr. Peter Schleder

Airplus Maintenance GmbH

Flughafen 28

88046 Friedrichshafen , Germany

Dear Mr. Schleder:

This is in response to your February 7, 2014, le tter sent to the public docket No.

FAA

- 2014

- 0147 petitioning the Federal Aviation Administrat ion (FAA) on behalf of Airplus

Maintenance GmbH (Airplus), for an exemption from Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations

(14 CFR) sections 91.411(b) and 91.413(c). That exemption, if granted, would allow

Airplus to perform altimeter system and altitude rep orting equipment tests and inspections

and ATC transponder tests and inspections on specified aircraft without holding an FAA

repair station certificate with ratings as required in 14 CFR sections 91.411(b) and 91.413(c).

In your petition you state that a lthough you applied for an FAA Repair Station Certification 3

years ago, an FAA ban on certificating new foreign repair stations has been in place pending

issuance of a Transportation Security Administration rule on Repair Station Security. The

TSA final rule on repair station security was issued on January 13, 2014 (copy enclosed). As

a result, the FAA is now processing applications for foreign repair station certificates; and

will not consider a petition while the application is being processed. We wil l take no furthe r

action on your petition.

Sincerely,

/s/

John Barbagallo

Acting Deputy Director, Flight Standards Service

Enclosures

Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations Part 15542
# C_2017283EN.01000901.xml

| 28.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 283/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 283/9

---

Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 29 June 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Augstākā tiesa — Latvia) — ‘L.Č.’ IK v Valsts ienemumu dienests

(Case C-288/16) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Directive 2006/112/EC - Value added tax (VAT) - Article 146(1)(e) - Exemptions on exportation - Supply of services directly connected with the exportation or the importation of goods - Meaning))

(2017/C 283/12)

Language of the case: Latvian

Referring court

Referring court

Augstākā tiesa

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant:‘L.Č.’ IK

Applicant:

Defendant: Valsts ienemumu dienests

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 146(1)(e) of Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as meaning that the exemption laid down in that provision does not apply to a supply of services, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, relating to a transaction consisting in the transport of goods to a third country, where those services are not provided directly to the consignor or the consignee of those goods.

---

(1)  OJ C 260, 18.7.2016.

1

---
Before the Second Division,

November 14, 1952

No. 56938.

#### Federal Telecommunication Laboratories, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 182522-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

From an examination of the papers in the case, the court found nothing tending in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the decision of the collector. The protest was therefore overruled.
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF ANNUAL REPORT

I, JAMES GRAINER, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Incode
Technologies Corp;

2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
to the period covered by this report;

3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in
this report;

4.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible
for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
registrant and have:

a.	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during
the period in which this report is being prepared;

b.	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
report based on such evaluation; and,

c.	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.

5.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed,
based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit
committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

a.	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and,

b.	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's
internal control over financial reporting.

                           By: /S/ JAMES GRAINER
                           --------------------
                           JAMES GRAINER
                           Chief Executive Officer and  Chief Financial Officer
                           Date: March 31, 2005
Exhibit 32

                CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


         The  undersigned,  who are the chief  executive  officer  and the chief
financial  officer of GrandSouth  Bancorporation,  Inc.,  each hereby  certifies
that, to the best of his knowledge,  the  accompanying  Form 10-KSB for the year
ended December 31, 2003,  fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that information  contained
in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the issuer.

March 30, 2004

                                       s/Mason Y. Garrett
                                       -----------------------------------
                                       Mason Y. Garrett
                                       Chief Executive Officer


                                       s/J. B. Garrett
                                       -----------------------------
                                       J. B. Garrett
                                       Chief Financial Officer
# C_2016027EN.01007001.xml

| 25.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 27/70 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 27/70

---

Action brought on 12 November 2015 — JT International v OHIM — Habanos (PUSH)

(Case T-633/15)

(2016/C 027/88)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: JT International SA (Geneva, Switzerland) (represented by: S. Malynicz, Barrister, K. Gilbert and M. Gilbert, Solicitors)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Corporación Habanos, SA (La Habana, Cuba)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Applicant: Applicant

Applicant:

Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘PUSH’ — Application for registration No 11 639 903

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before OHIM:

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 10 August 2015 in Case R 3046/2014-5

Contested decision:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order OHIM and other party to bear their own costs and pay those of the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM and other party to bear their own costs and pay those of the applicant.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
No. 59970.

#### W. X. Huber Co. *v.*United States,

protests 848716-G, 952924-G, and 956072-G (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that 20 percent of the merchandise consists of rags used chiefly for papermaking, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained with respect to said 20 percent of the merchandise.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

: CIVIL ACTION NOS.

:

HAYES : 02-3937

MCKNIGHT : 02-3954

SKOGLULND : 02-3979

BALLIRO : 02-4111

SADEIK : 02-4129

HAYWARD, et al. : 02-4133

WAINER, et al. : 02-4177

VAN STREEPEN, et al. : 02-4199

BAILEY : 02-4231

ABERCROMBIE, et al. : 02-4235

TRESSLAR, et al. : 02-4291

CONLEY, et al. : 02-4296

GLADHART, et al. : 02-4312

:

VS. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION, et al. :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of July, 2002, the Court having been previously

advised that the above action cannot proceed to trial and disposition because of the following

reason:

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending disposition of a related

action.

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending determination of

arbitration proceedings.

[ ] - Interlocutory appeal filed.

[ X ] - Other: Case is placed into suspense pending receipt of the Case

Transfer Order from the Judicial Panel on Multi District Litigation

transferring case to District of Minnesota..

Case 2:02-cv-04231-CMR Document 2 Filed 07/10/2002 Page 1 of 2
It is

ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this action closed for statistical purposes and

place the matter in the Civil Suspense File, and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction; and that the case be

restored to the trial docket when the action is in a status so that it may proceed to final

disposition; this order shall not prejudice the rights of the parties to this litigation.

BY THE COURT:

________________________________________

Cynthia M. Rufe, Judge

Case 2:02-cv-04231-CMR Document 2 Filed 07/10/2002 Page 2 of 2