alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001051114
<NAME> INNOTRAC CORPORATION
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                         540,157
<SECURITIES>                                 3,515,503
<RECEIVABLES>                               42,162,996
<ALLOWANCES>                                 5,109,133
<INVENTORY>                                  2,100,448
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            47,293,955
<PP&E>                                      13,643,580
<DEPRECIATION>                               6,031,156
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              55,048,806
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       24,015,238
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                          562,666
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    25,924,708
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,424,991
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                55,048,806
<SALES>                                     58,910,636
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            58,910,636
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               42,926,304
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                             8,903,647
<LOSS-PROVISION>                            10,430,156
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             572,885
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              6,486,841
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,082,000
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          5,404,841
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,404,841
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.54
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.54
        

</TABLE>
# C_2017070EN.01000702.xml

| 6.3.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 70/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.3.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 70/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 18 January 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny — Poland) — Minister Finansów v Stowarzyszenie Artystów Wykonawców Utworów Muzycznych i Słowno-Muzycznych SAWP (SAWP)

(Case C-37/16) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Taxation - Common system of value added tax - Taxable transactions - Concept of ‘supply of services for consideration’ - Payment of fees, in respect of fair compensation, to organisations collectively managing copyright and related rights - Not included))

(2017/C 070/11)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Referring court

Naczelny Sąd Administracyjny

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Minister Finansów

Appellant:

Respondent: Stowarzyszenie Artystów Wykonawców Utworów Muzycznych i Słowno-Muzycznych SAWP (SAWP)

Respondent:

Intervening parties: Prokuratura Generalna, Stowarzyszenie Zbiorowego Zarządzania Prawami Autorskimi Twórców Dzieł Naukowych i Technicznych Kopipol, Stowarzyszenie Autorów i Wydawców Copyright Polska

Intervening parties:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax, as amended by Council Directive 2010/45/EU of 13 July 2010, must be interpreted as meaning that holders of reproduction rights do not make a supply of services, within the meaning of that directive, to producers and importers of blank media and of recording and reproduction devices on whom organisations collectively managing copyright and related rights levy on behalf of those rightholders, but in their own name, fees in respect of the sale of those devices and media.

---

(1)  OJ C 145, 25.4.2016.

1

---
DIME. i

THE oi, saunas sank (SQ TH

ROBERT S. MONHEIT LAW DEPARTMENT

REGULATORY COUNSEL, EAB PLAZA, 10TH FLOOR
(516) 745-2908 UNIONDALE, NY 11556-0128
FAX: (516) 745-2909 Intemet Address:monheitr@dime.com

September 28, 1999

Via e-mail

Ms. Cynthia L. Johnson

Director, Cash Management Policy and Planning Division
Financial Management Service, Room 420

Department of the Treasury

401 14" Street, SW

Washington, DC 20227

Re: Notice of Proposed Rulemaking -- Treasury Tax and Loan Program
Dear Ms. Johnson:

The Dime Savings Bank of New York, FSB (the “Dime”) wishes to offer the following
comments on the Financial Management Service’s proposed revision to its regulations governing
the Treasury Tax and Loan (“TT&L”) program, 64 Fed. Reg. 41748, July 30, 1999 (the “Proposed
Rule”).

The Dime is a $20 billion federal savings bank serving customers and businesses through
branches in the New York City metropolitan area, including Long Island and northern New Jersey.
Directly and through the over 200 offices of its North American Mortgage Company subsidiary,
the Dime provides consumer financial services and mortgage banking services throughout the
United States. The Dime also serves small to medium sized business. One of the services
provided to those customers is the collection and remittance of quarterly estimated tax payments
as part of Dime’s participation in the TT&L program.

The Proposed Rule would change the calculation of the rate of interest that a financial
institution, such as the Dime, must pay on TT&L accounts. Currently, this rate of interest is
calculated as the Fed Funds rate minus 25 basis points. The Proposed Rule would require that the
rate of interest be calculated by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York from the volume-weighted
average overnight rate paid to finance general collateral securities. This rate would be published
weekly by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, The Dime believes that the
Proposed Rule would have a significantly negative impact on the willingness of financial
institutions to offer TT&L accounts.

MEMBER FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION


Ms. Cynthia L. Johnson
September 28, 1999
Page 2

During the current year, the Dime has maintained average balances of TT&L deposits of
approximately $140 million. If implemented, it is estimated that the Proposed Rule would increase
the cost of the Dime’s TT&L deposits by an average of 23 basis points. Based upon this average,
the Proposed Rule would increase the Dime’s interest expense by approximately $322,000
annually. This increase in the cost of TT&L deposits would cause the Dime to seriously consider
curtailing its participation in the TT&L program. We believe that other financial institutions also
would reconsider continuing participation in the TT&L program.

For these reasons, the Dime respectfully suggests that the Proposed Rule be withdrawn.

The Dime appreciates this opportunity to comment on the Proposed Rule. If you have any
questions regarding this comment letter, please contact me at (516) 745-2908.

Very truly yours,

2retlS DAB

Robert S. Monheit

[MEMBER FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION
# Crist ICR Daily Heat Input (Fuel Based) Data Summary

(includes Coal, Oil and Gas)

Crist 4 Crist 5 Crist 6 Crist 7Total 4-7 TOTALTOTALTOTAL TOTAL TOTAL ADJ ADJ ADJ ADJ ADJ DA TE MMBTUMMBTUMMBTUMMBTUMMBTU 04/01/2010 0 11631 0 69342 80973 04/02/2010 0 12051 4411 70844 87307 04/03/2010 0 13603 30834 23638 68076 04/04/2010 0 13755 45780 0 59534 04/05/2010 0 14054 51642 0 65696 04/06/2010 0 12332 38051 0 50383 04/07/2010 0 13915 47107 30967 91990 04/08/2010 0 12302 22141 80513 114955 04/09/2010 0 11512 0 65597 77109 04/10/2010 0 11796 0 71288 83084 04/11/2010 0 11604 0 75473 87077 04/12/2010 0 12784 0 84586 97370 04/13/2010 0 12533 0 80835 93368 04/14/2010 0 12068 0 77385 89453 04/15/2010 0 13380 0 89257 102637 04/16/2010 0 12129 0 81332 93462 04/17/2010 0 11832 0 80172 92004 04/18/2010 0 13064 0 87925 100989 04/19/2010 0 11738 0 68473 80211 04/20/2010 0 11528 0 67699 79227 04/21/2010 0 11498 0 79385 90883 04/22/2010 0 12354 0 76811 89165 04/23/2010 5749 12956 0 84324 103029 04/24/2010 12723 12148 3382 73134 101388 04/25/2010 13350 12455 37534 76675 140014 04/26/2010 10627 11498 36360 70285 128771 04/27/2010 14592 15802 47538 90491 168423 04/28/2010 15840 16647 54712 90069 177267 04/29/2010 9822 11810 34944 66967 123544 04/30/2010 0 13332 38721 79724 131778 TYD Month 2949163
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                         474,975
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                               0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                             7,350,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                  4,011,949
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                      4,529,612
<ALLOWANCE>                                    (45,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              17,498,164
<DEPOSITS>                                   4,159,389
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                            229,158
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                    13,736,665
<OTHER-SE>                                    (627,048)
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>              17,498,164
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 38,958
<INTEREST-INVEST>                              219,801
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                               258,759
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               6,555
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              18,488
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                          240,271
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                   45,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                746,884
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (551,613)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                    (551,613)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (551,613)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     (.38)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     (.38)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    6.24
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                     0
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                               45,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                            45,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
Before the First Division,

April 8, 1968

No. P68/195.

protests 66/57280, etc. (Seattle).

#### Border Brokerage Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Watson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of Elasto-muffles similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Border Brokerage Company, Inc.*v. *United States*(58 Cust. Ct. 240, C.D. 2948), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
​

Exhibit 10.4
​
Schedule of the Owners of Company-Managed Texas Roadhouse Restaurants and the
Interests Held by Directors, Executive Officers and 5% Stockholders Who Are Parties to
Limited Partnership Agreements and Operating Agreements
​
As of December 29, 2020
​
	7


	​


	​


	​


	​


	​


	​


	​


	​


	​



	Entity Name
	    
	Restaurant Location
	    
	Percentage of
Holdings' Interest
	    
	Actual Management Fee
Charged
	    
	Percentage Owned by
Executive Officers,
Directors & 5%
Stockholders
	​

	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​

	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​

	Texas Roadhouse of Billings, LLC
	​
	Billings, MT
	​
	5
	%  
	0.5
	%  
	27.5
	%

	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​

	Texas Roadhouse of Brownsville, Ltd.
	​
	Brownsville, TX
	​
	5.09
	%  
	0.5
	%  
	3.07
	%

	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​

	Texas Roadhouse of Everett, LLC
	​
	Everett, MA
	​
	5
	%  
	0.5
	%  
	28.75
	%

	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​

	Texas Roadhouse of Gilbert, AZ, LLC
	​
	Gilbert, AZ
	​
	52.5
	%
	3.5
	%
	35.5
	%

	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​

	Texas Roadhouse of Mansfield, Ltd.
	​
	Mansfield, TX
	​
	52.5
	%
	3.5
	%
	34.5
	%

	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​

	Roadhouse of McKinney, Ltd. 
	​
	McKinney, TX
	​
	5
	%  
	0.5
	%  
	2.0
	%

	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​

	Texas Roadhouse of Port Arthur, Ltd. 
	​
	Port Arthur, TX
	​
	5
	%  
	0.5
	%  
	15.0
	%

	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​
	​

	Roadhouse of Kansas, LLC
	​
	Wichita, KS
	​
	5
	%  
	0.5
	%  
	24.05
	%



​
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Energy

###### Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

          - [Project No. 7883-020]

On Wednesday, November 15, 2023, Commission staff will hold a technical conference to provide clarification to Powerhouse Systems, Inc (Powerhouse) regarding the Exhibit F Supporting Design Report (SDR), for the Weston Dam Hydroelectric Project No. 7883.

The conference will be held via teleconference beginning at 10:30 a.m. eastern standard time. Discussion topics for the technical conference include: (1) the information provided in the Powerhouse's Exhibit F SDR filed on October 2, 2023; and (2) information required to provide an updated SDR that meets Commission regulations.

                    All local, State, and Federal agencies, Indian Tribes, and other interested parties are invited to participate. There will be no transcript of the conference, but a summary of the meeting will be prepared for the project record. If you are interested in participating in the meeting you must contact John Baummer at (202) 502-6837 or                     *john.baummer@ferc.gov*                     by November 10, 2023 to receive specific instructions on how to participate.                

Dated: November 1, 2023.

Debbie-Anne A. Reese,

Deputy Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2023-24589 Filed 11-6-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6717-01-P
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________ No. 98-20270 cons/w No. 98-20750 Summary Calendar

__________________

CHRISTOPHER JOSEPH SALAZAR, II, Petitioner-Appellant,

versus GARY L. JOHNSON, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, Respondent-Appellee.

--------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. H-94-CV-3902

---------------------- December 19,2000 Before DAVIS, JONES, and DeMOSS, CIRCUIT JUDGES.

PER CURIAM: *

Christopher Joseph Salazar, II, Texas prisoner #412334, appeals from the denial of his application for federal habeas

corpus relief. Salazar argues that his counsel was constitutionally ineffective for failing to inform him of his right to appeal his guilty-plea conviction for aggravated robbery.

We have reviewed the record, the briefs of the parties, and the applicable law, and we find no reversible error. SalazarO R D E R Nos. 98-20270 & 98-20750

-2-

did not instruct his counsel to file an appeal, and he suggests no basis for finding that a rational defendant would have wished to
file an appeal in this case. Accordingly, he cannot demonstrate prejudice from any alleged deficiency by counsel. S ee Roe v. Flores-Ortega , 120 S. Ct. 1029, 1039 (2000). The failure to
establish prejudi ce defeats Salazar’s ineffective-assistance-ofcounsel claim. S ee Strickland v. Washington , 466 U.S. 668, 697 (1984). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED

.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the EnergySouth, Inc. (the Company) Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q/A for the period ending December 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Charles P. Huffman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;
and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
of the Company. Date: May 17, 2004
    By:
    /s/ Charles P. HuffmanCharles P. HuffmanSenior Vice President and
   Chief Financial Officer
Before the Second Division,

December 27, 1943

No. 49065.

#### Protests 781283-G, etc., of Dritz Traum Co. et al. (New York].

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MARIA KOVACS

: CIVIL ACTION

:

vs. :

: NO. 02-04161

WAL-MART

WAL-MART STORES,INC.

O R D E R

AND NOW, TO WIT: This 21st day of March, 2003,

it having been reported that the issues between the parties in the above action has been settled and

upon Order of the Court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1(b) of the Local Rules of Civil

Procedure of this Court , it is

ORDERED that the above action is DISMISSED with prejudice, pursuant to

agreement of counsel without costs.

MICHAEL E. KUNZ, Clerk of Court

BY: 

Stephen J. Iannacone 

 Deputy Clerk

Civ 2 (8/2000)

41(b).frm

Case 2:02-cv-04161-HH Document 11 Filed 03/21/2003 Page 1 of 1
---

EXHIBIT 13.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. §1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Xiana Mining Inc. (the
Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended January 31, 2015, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Rowland
Perkins, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

Dated: May 31, 2015

| | /s/
      Rowland Perkins
| | -------------------------
| | Rowland Perkins          
| | Chief Executive Officer  

---
!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !

! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !

!

!

!

! !

!

!

!

!

! !

!

!

!

! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! ! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !

!

!

!

!

!

! ! ! !!

! ! !

!

!

! ! !

!

!

!

!

! !

!

! !

!

!

!

!

! !!!!

!

! ! ! ! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !!

! !

!

! !

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !

!

! !

! !!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

!

! !

!

!

! !!

! ! !

! ! !

!

!

!

!

! !

!

!

!

!

!!

!

! !

NSDI CAP Projects 1994-2012

Location may receive more than one award

Project's geographic area of interest could be

national or a region, state, county, or city

! Host locations for CAP projects

April 30, 2012

Base data courtesy of the National Atlas of the United States®