alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY
ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Waste Industries USA, Inc. (the Company) for the period
ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or about the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods
presented in the Report.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



/s/ D. Stephen GrissomChief Financial OfficerApril 29, 2008
No. 67758.

#### B. Altman & Co. and Felix Glatz Import Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 61/3659 and 61/1296 (New York).

*313Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *Falcon Sales Company*and *J. J. Murphy & Co.*v. *United States*(47 Cust. Ct. 129, C.D. 2292), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 57191.

protests 636990-G, etc. (New York).

#### W. J. Byrnes & Co. of N. Y. and A. Shesunoff et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the kidskin plates-are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Kung Chen Fur Corpn.*v. *United States*(29 Cust Ct. 266, C. D. 1480), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Ford, J., concurred.

Mollison, J., dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1480, *supra.*
Exhibit 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with this annual filing of DNAPrint genomics, Inc., a Utah
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31,
2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I,
Monica Tamborini, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                          By: /s/ Monica Tamborini
                                              ------------------------
                                              Monica Tamborini
                                              Chief Financial Officer
                                              Date: May 17, 2005
<PAGE>





                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                           AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


        I, Gregory B. Kerfoot, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the
Annual Report of Crystal Decisions, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
June 28, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained
in such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Crystal Decisions, Inc.



                                       By: /s/ Gregory B. Kerfoot
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Gregory B. Kerfoot
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer




        I, Eric Patel, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual
Report of Crystal Decisions, Inc. on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June
28, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that information contained in
such Annual Report on Form 10-K fairly presents in all material respects the
financial condition and results of operations of Crystal Decisions, Inc.



                                       By: /s/ Eric Patel
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Eric Patel
                                          Chief Financial Officer
No. 54558.

#### George Borgfeldt Corp. *v.*United States,

protests 147903-K, 147904-K, and 148603-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the

•court dismissed the protests.
Exhibit 8.1

List of Subsidiaries of Crucell N.V. as of April 8, 2003

|Legal Entity                                                  |  | Country of registration
|------------------------------------------------------------- |  | -----------------------
|100% subsidiary Crucell N.V.:
Crucell Holland B.V.
(Leiden)   |  | Netherlands            
|100% subsidiary Crucell Holland B.V.: U-BiSys B.V.
(Utrecht)  |  | Netherlands            
|20.8% subsidiary Crucell Holland B.V.
Galapagos Genomics N.V. |  | Belgium (Mechelen)     

---

QuickLinks
# C_2015337EN.01003402.xml

| 12.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 337/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 337/34

---

Action brought on 11 August 2015 — Drex Technologies v Council

(Case T-467/15)

(2015/C 337/37)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Drex Technologies SA (Tortola, British Virgin Islands) (represented by: E. Ruchat, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Declare the applicant’s action admissible and well founded; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare the applicant’s action admissible and well founded;

| — | Consequently, annul Decision (CFSP) 2015/837 of 28 May 2015 and the subsequent measures implementing it, in so far as they relate to the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

Consequently, annul Decision (CFSP) 2015/837 of 28 May 2015 and the subsequent measures implementing it, in so far as they relate to the applicant;

| — | Order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant raises three pleas in law which are, in essence, identical or similar to those raised in Case T-432/11 in Makhlouf v Council
   (1).

Makhlouf

Council

1

---

(1)  OJ C 290, p. 13.

1

---
# JAN 13  0750AM

CDR420

Line-In Record

Other

961.1753
NUMBER 13-18-00614-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

ELOY HERACLIO ALCALA, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

On appeal from the 332nd District Court 

of Hidalgo County, Texas.

ORDER TO FILE APPELLATE BRIEF

Before Chief Justice Contreras and Justices Hinojosa and Tijerina

Order Per Curiam

This cause is currently before the Court on appellant's second motion for extension 

of time to file the brief. The reporter’s record was filed on May 6, 2019, and appellant’s 

brief was originally due to be filed thirty days thereafter. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a). 

Appellant’s first motion for extension of time to file the brief was granted in part and denied 
2

in part. The Court denied a 120-day extension and granted a 90-day extension of time 

to file the brief. Appellant now seeks an additional 90 days, until November 3, 2019, to 

file the brief. 

The Court GRANTS appellant’s second motion for extension to file the brief and 

ORDERS the Honorable Victoria Guerra to file the brief on or before November 3, 2019. 

The Court looks with disfavor on the delay caused by counsel’s failure to timely file a brief 

in this matter. No further extensions will be granted absent exigent circumstances. If 

counsel fails to file the brief within the specified period of time, the Court will act 

appropriately to ensure that appellant's rights are protected. See id. R. 38.8(b)(4). 

PER CURIAM

Do not publish.

TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).

Delivered and filed the

11th day of September, 2019.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

: CIVIL ACTION NOS.

:

STANFORD : 02-3874

RAYMOND : 02-3880

LOVE, et al. : 02-3912

JAY, et al. : 02-3923

JOHENGEN, et al. : 02-3943

MCDONALD : 02-3963

CRISOSTOMO : 02-3982

SANTOS : 02-4106

TRACEY, et al. : 02-4115

COSENZA : 02-4146

HOOD, et al. : 02-4154

PICKNER : 02-4213

BROWN, et al. : 02-4224

EWING, et al. : 02-4226

RIGEL, et al. : 02-4259

SANTOS : 02-4284

GARCIA : 02-4311

EVANS, et al. : 02-4316

:

VS. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION, et al. :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of July, 2002, the Court having been previously

advised that the above action cannot proceed to trial and disposition because of the following

reason:

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending disposition of a related

action.

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending determination of

arbitration proceedings.

[ ] - Interlocutory appeal filed.

Case 2:02-cv-04226-BWK Document 2 Filed 07/11/2002 Page 1 of 2
[ X ] - Other: Case is placed into suspense pending receipt of the Case

Transfer Order from the Judicial Panel on Multi District Litigation

transferring case to District of Minnesota..

It is

ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this action closed for statistical purposes and

place the matter in the Civil Suspense File, and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction; and that the case be

restored to the trial docket when the action is in a status so that it may proceed to final

disposition; this order shall not prejudice the rights of the parties to this litigation.

BY THE COURT:

________________________________________

Bruce W. Kauffman, Judge

Case 2:02-cv-04226-BWK Document 2 Filed 07/11/2002 Page 2 of 2
1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF 

AMERICA

:

:

: CRIMINAL ACTION

v. :

:

No. 04-00014-1

CIVIL ACTION

JOHN DOUGLAS RANSOME

:

: 

:

No. 16-3142

ORDER

AND NOW, this 8th day of May, 2024, it is ORDERED that John Douglas 

Ransome’s Motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (ECF No. 85) is GRANTED. Mr. 

Ransome’s sentence in Criminal Case No. 04-14-1 is VACATED pending a 

resentencing hearing on September 5, 2024 at 10:30am. 

__s/ANITA B. BRODY, J.__________ 

ANITA B. BRODY, J. 

Case 2:04-cr-00014-AB Document 113 Filed 05/08/24 Page 1 of 1
a1stssrpamendment2017719






 





 






- 2 - AMENDMENT 2017-1  TO THE  ADT LLC SUPPLEMENTAL SAVINGS AND RETIREMENT PLAN  The ADT LLC Supplemental Savings and Retirement Plan, as amended and restated as of  April 1, 2017 (the “Plan”), is hereby amended effective December , 2017 as follows:  1. The first sentence of Section 2.25 (Eligible Employee) is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:  “Eligible Employee” for all purposes under this Plan (other than eligibility for a  Company Credit prior to January 1, 2014 under Section 6.3) includes any employee of  the Company who is (i) a U.S. citizen or a resident alien permanently assigned to work in  the United States, (ii) paid on the United States payroll (other than Puerto Rico), (iii)  either (a) subject to the requirements of Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, (b) included  in career band 0, 1, 2 or 3 of the Company’s pay scale, or (c) included in career band 4 of  the Company’s pay scale and participated in this Plan during the 2013 Plan Year, (iv)  expected to be paid a Base Salary for the next relevant Plan Year for which the individual  is completing an Enrollment and Payment Agreement that equals or exceeds the “highly  compensated employee” dollar threshold under Section 414(q)(1)(B) in effect during the  Plan Year in which the individual enrolls and (v) has management responsibility.
# IPANM Comments Completions whitepaper

Dear Sir - Please find attached the second of five emails with comments drafted by IPANM attached. Should you hav e any questions, please do not hesitate to contact our Ex ecutive Director, Karin Foster, at Fosterassociates2005@yahoo.com or at 505-238-8385 Thank you.
Karin Foster Karin V. Foster, Esq. Executive Director IPANM Chatham Partners, Inc. Follow me on 'Twitter" @oilandgaslady Fosterassociates2005@yahoo.com (505) 238-8385 - cell

_________________________________________________ This message (including attachments) constitutes a confidential attorney-client or is otherwise a conf idential communication from the firm, Chatham Partn ers Inc.., that is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. Sections 2510 -2521, and is intended solely for the use of the in dividual(s) or entity to whom it is addressed. It i s not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, any unauthorized person. If you are not the intende d recipient or received these documents by mistake or error, please do not read it and immediately not ify us by collect telephone call to (505)238-8385 for instructions on its destruction or return. If you are not the intended recipient, y ou are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying , distribution, action or reliance upon the content s of the documents is strictly prohibited. 

## Foster <fosterassociates2005@yahoo.com> Karin Mon 6/16/2014 7:07 PM To: OilandGas.Whitepapers <OilandGas.Whitepapers@epa.go v>; 

###  1 attachment IPANM completions hydrualically fractured oil wells .pdf; 

### Page **1 of**  **1 IPANM Comments Completions whitepaper**  **- OilandGas.Whitepapers** 

**8/ 26/** **2014 https://pod51045.outlook.com/owa/OilandGas.Whitepapers@epa.gov/**
# C_2015328EN.01003001.xml

| 5.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 328/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 328/30

---

Action brought on 11 August 2015 — Fakro v OHIM — Saint Gobain Cristalería (climaVera)

(Case T-457/15)

(2015/C 328/27)

Language in which the application was lodged: Polish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Fakro Sp. z o.o. (Nowy Sącz, Poland) (represented by: J. Radłowski, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Saint Gobain Cristalería, SL (Madrid, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Applicant for the Community trade mark: The applicant

Applicant for the Community trade mark:

Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word element ‘climaVera’ — Community trade mark No 1 152 1366

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before OHIM:

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 May 2015 in Case R 2095/2014-2

Contested decision:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | set aside the contested decision in its entirety and refer the case back to OHIM for reconsideration; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the contested decision in its entirety and refer the case back to OHIM for reconsideration;

| — | award the costs of the proceedings and representation to the applicant in accordance with the prescribed rules. |
| --- | --- |

—

award the costs of the proceedings and representation to the applicant in accordance with the prescribed rules.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 70-3 Filed 08/27/2009 Page 1 of 6
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 70-3 Filed 08/27/2009 Page 2 of 6
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 70-3 Filed 08/27/2009 Page 3 of 6
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 70-3 Filed 08/27/2009 Page 4 of 6
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 70-3 Filed 08/27/2009 Page 5 of 6
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 70-3 Filed 08/27/2009 Page 6 of 6
EXHIBIT 32.1 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER CERTIFICATION UNDER 18 USC 1350


  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
   AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
    SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with Heritage Financial Holding Corporation's ("Company")
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003 ("Report"), the
undersigned certifies that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Date: March 29, 2004  By: /s/ Larry R. Mathews
      ---------------------------------------------
      Larry R. Mathews
      President and Chief Executive Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to Heritage Financial Holding Corporation and will be retained by
Heritage Financial Holding Corporation and furnished to the Securities and
Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.


<PAGE>
Exhibit
23.1
 
 
 
 
 CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
 
 
  
 To the
Board of Directors
 The
Bluebook International Holding Company
 
 We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the previously filed Registration
Statement of The Bluebook International Holding Company on Form S-8 (File No.
333-121567) of our report, dated March 25, 2005, appearing in this Annual Report
on Form 10-KSB of The Bluebook International Holding Company for the year ended
December 31, 2004.
 
 
  WEINBERG
& COMPANY, P.A.
 
 
 Boca
Raton, Florida
 April 15,
2005
No. 52900.

#### Standard Synthetics, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 111476-K (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of labdanum oil the same in all material respects as that the subject of *Standard Synthetics, Inc.*v. *United States*(21 Cust. Ct. 20, C. D. 1119), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 
  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Alternet Systems,
  Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004 as
  filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
  each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below,
  hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to their knowledge:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements
        of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                      
| | -- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                    
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
        in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation
        of the Company.

|Dated: March 30, 2005 | By: | /s/ Michael Dearden   
|--------------------- | --- | ----------------------
|                      |     | Michael Dearden       
|                      |     | President and Director

---
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Duska Therapeutics, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Wayne Lorgus, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

|                     |     |                                     
|-------------------- | --- | ------------------------------------
|                     |     |                                     
|Date: March 31, 2009 | By: | /s/ Wayne Lorgus                    
|                     |     | Wayne Lorgus
Chief Financial Officer
# C_2015171EN.01003301.xml

| 26.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/33

---

Action brought on 30 March 2015 — DHL Express (France) v OHIM — Chronopost (WEBSHIPPIING)

(Case T-142/15)

(2015/C 171/39)

Language in which the application was lodged: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: DHL Express (France) (Le Bourget, France) (represented by: A. Casalonga, F. Codevelle and C. Bercial Arias, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Chronopost (Paris, France)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: Community trade mark No 1 909 183

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Cancellation proceedings

Procedure before OHIM

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 28 January 2015 in Case R 2425/2013-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | declare that the rights of the proprietor of Community registration No 1 909 183 WEBSHIPPING are to be revoked and that the mark be deemed not to have had any effects as from the date of the application for revocation, namely 6 July 2012; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that the rights of the proprietor of Community registration No 1 909 183 WEBSHIPPING are to be revoked and that the mark be deemed not to have had any effects as from the date of the application for revocation, namely 6 July 2012;

| — | order OHIM and the intervener (if necessary) to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM and the intervener (if necessary) to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---