alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR
. R. 47.5.4. 

### IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 06-50014 Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee

v. TONY DAVIS Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 1:02-CV-122 USDC No. 1:96-CR-190
Before JOLLY, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: * Tony Robert Davis, former federal prisoner # 68917-080, was convicted and sentenced on eight counts of conspiracy, wire fraud, travel and transportation ofsecurities for fraudulent purposes, and money laundering. See United States v. Davis, 226 F.3d 346, 348 (5th Cir. 2000). Davis now seeks a certificate of appealability (COA) to appeal the district court's denial of his United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D October 15, 2007 Charles R. Fulbruge III ClerkNo. 06-50014

2 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion challenging those convictions and sentences. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c). During the pendency of this appeal, Davis was released from prison, and he completed his term of supervised release. As a result, Davis's claims have been rendered moot. See Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 7 (1998); Bailey v. Southerland, 821 F.2d 277, 278-79 (5th Cir. 1987). Therefore, this appeal is dismissed as moot. Davis’s motions for COA and to supplement the record on appeal are denied. Davis’s abuse ofthejudicial system warrants the imposition ofa sanction. Daviswaswarned in a prior appeal in a 28 U.S.C. § 2241 proceeding that further frivolous filings would result in the imposition of sanctions. Davis v. Wendt, No. 04-10926 (5th Cir. Mar. 24, 2006)(unpublished). Accordingly, concomitantly with any other sanction already imposed by this or any other court, Davis is no longer allowed to file any documents or pleadings in this court or in any court
subject to this court’s jurisdiction without first obtaining permission from a judge of this court. The Clerk of this Court and the clerks of all federal district courts within this Circuit are directed to refuse to file any pro se civil complaint
or appeal by Davis unless Davis submits proof that he has obtained the permission of this court. If Davis attempts to file any further notices of appeal
or original proceedi ngs in this court the clerk will docket them for administrative purposes only. Any other submissions which do not show proof that the sanction has been satisfied will be neither addressed nor acknowledged. APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTIONS DENIED; SANCTION IMPOSED.
Final Listing of Questionnaire Files for Steam Electric Rulemaking Record

Plant ID 01657

Removed 

from Public 

(Non-CBI) 

Docket1

Copyright 

Flag2

File Name Description

x 01657\01657_Checklist.xls EPA Technical Review Checklist Workbook

01657\01657_Completeness_Checklist.xls EPA Completeness Review Checklist

01657\01657_HardcopyLog.doc EPA log of hardcopy documents submitted

x 01657\01657_Part A.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 01657\01657_Part B.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 01657\01657_PartA_Old.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 01657\01657_PartC.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 01657\01657_PartC_Old.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 01657\01657_PartD.xls Plant submitted survey file

x 01657\01657_PartH.xls Plant submitted survey file

01657\Certification Statement_01657.pdf Plant certification statement

x 01657\Follow up\01657_Follow Up_1.pdf Followup correspondence

x 01657\Follow up\01657_Follow up_2.pdf Followup correspondence

x 01657\Follow up\01657_Follow up_3.pdf Followup correspondence

x x 01657\Supporting Documentation\01657_Ash Handling System.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x x 01657\Supporting Documentation\01657_Ash Vacuum System.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 01657\Supporting Documentation\01657_Facility Water Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x 01657\Supporting Documentation\01657_Waste Water Flow Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x x 01657\Supporting Documentation\01657_WWT Diagram.pdf Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

x x 01657\Supporting Documentation\Copy of Sunbury Generation LP Section D.xls Plant submitted supplemental files to the survey

1

 Final reviewed survey responses are located in the Steam Electric Technical Questionnaire Database . 

2

 Copyright documents are available from the docket.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

VIRGIL and DORIS L. NAPIER :

: CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-CV-4256

Plaintiffs, :

:

v. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION;

BAYER AG;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE;

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM

:

:

:

:

:

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

:

Defendants. :

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of the Court:

Kindly enter the appearances of Hope S. Freiwald, Aline Fairweather, Erin

Brennan and Kirstin J. Miller as attorneys for defendant SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a

GlaxoSmithKline.

Respectfully Submitted,

_____________________________ _____________________________

Hope S. Freiwald Aline Fairweather

_____________________________ _____________________________

Erin Brennan Kirstin J. Miller

DECHERT PRICE & RHOADS

4000 Bell Atlantic Tower

1717 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2793

(215) 994-4000

Case 2:02-cv-04256-HH Document 8 Filed 10/02/2002 Page 1 of 1
# Continuation of the National Emergency With Respect to the Proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction

On November 14, 1994, by Executive Order 12938, the President declared a national emergency with respect to the unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States posed by the proliferation of nuclear, biological, and chemical weapons (weapons of mass destruction) and the means of delivering such weapons. On July 28, 1998, by Executive Order 13094, the President amended Executive Order 12938 to respond more effectively to the worldwide threat of weapons of mass destruction proliferation activities. On June 28, 2005, by Executive Order 13382, the President, among other things, further amended Executive Order 12938 to improve our ability to combat proliferation. The proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them continues to pose an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States. For this reason, the national emergency declared in Executive Order 12938 of November 14, 1994, with respect to the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering such weapons must continue beyond November 14, 2023. Therefore, in accordance with section 202(d) of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1622(d)), I am continuing for 1 year the national emergency declared in Executive Order 12938, as amended.

                    This notice shall be published in the                     *Federal Register*                     and transmitted to the Congress.                

[FR Doc. 2023-24504

Billing code 3395-F4-P
H. Res. 811 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

April 11, 2018. 

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order to consider in the House the bill (H.R. 4790) to 

amend the Volcker rule to give the Board of Governors of the 

Federal Reserve System sole rulemaking authority, to exclude 

community banks from the requirements of the Volcker rule, 

and for other purposes. All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. In lieu of the amendment in the 

nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Financial Services now printed in the bill, an amendment in the 

nature of a substitute consisting of the text of Rules Committee Print 115–67 shall be considered as adopted. The bill, 

as amended, shall be considered as read. All points of order 

against provisions in the bill, as amended, are waived. The 

previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, 

as amended, and on any further amendment thereto, to final 

passage without intervening motion except: (1) one hour of 

debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and rank-
2 

•HRES 811 EH 

ing minority member of the Committee on Financial Services; 

and (2) one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

SEC. 2. (a) It shall be in order at any time on the legislative day of April 12, 2018, for the Speaker to entertain motions that the House suspend the rules, as though under 

clause 1 of rule XV, relating to the joint resolution (H.J. 

Res. 2) proposing a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution of the United States. Debate on such a motion shall 

be extended to four hours. (b) The Chair may postpone further consideration of a motion considered pursuant to subsection (a) to such time as may be designated by the Speaker. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
Before the Third Division,

August 3, 1949

No. 53452.

protests 111899-K, etc. (New York).

#### Perry H. Chipurnoi et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
# C_2015107EN.01003601.xml

| 30.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 107/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 107/36

---

Action brought on 6 February 2015 — 1&1 Internet v OHIM — Unoe Bank (1e1)

(Case T-61/15)

(2015/C 107/47)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicant: 1&1 Internet AG (Montabaur, Germany) (represented by: G. Klopp, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Unoe Bank, SA (Madrid, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘1e1’ — Application No 11 047 479

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 4 December 2014 in Case R 101/2014-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision relating to opposition proceedings No B 002090507 between 1&1 Internet AG and UNO E Bank; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision relating to opposition proceedings No B 002090507 between 1&1 Internet AG and UNO E Bank;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
Case 2:04-cv-20616-HB Document 4 Filed 03/09/06 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:04-cv-20616-HB Document 4 Filed 03/09/06 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:04-cv-20616-HB Document 4 Filed 03/09/06 Page 3 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

: CIVIL ACTION NOS.

:

ROCHELLE : 02-3867

MONTGOMERY : 02-3889

HINES : 02-3901

KARI, et al. : 02-3926

HABERMAN : 02-3936

MILEY : 02-3951

FRANCO, et al. : 02-3975

DAVIS : 02-4113

RUSSELL, et al. : 02-4116

HERNANDEZ, et al. : 02-4126

QUILLEN, et al. : 02-4167

SIMMONS, et al. : 02-4174

BIEDERMAN : 02-4194

DRY, et al. : 02-4225

COOK : 02-4237

STEFAN, et al. : 02-4277

WALKER, et al. : 02-4283

DUNCAN, et al. : 02-4301

:

VS. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION, et al. :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of July, 2002, the Court having been previously

advised that the above action cannot proceed to trial and disposition because of the following

reason:

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending disposition of a related

action.

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending determination of

arbitration proceedings.

[ ] - Interlocutory appeal filed.

Case 2:02-cv-04174-SD Document 2 Filed 07/10/2002 Page 1 of 2
[ X ] - Other: Case is placed into suspense pending receipt of the Case

Transfer Order from the Judicial Panel on Multi District Litigation

transferring case to District of Minnesota.

It is

ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this action closed for statistical purposes and

place the matter in the Civil Suspense File, and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction; and that the case be

restored to the trial docket when the action is in a status so that it may proceed to final

disposition; this order shall not prejudice the rights of the parties to this litigation.

BY THE COURT:

________________________________________

Stewart Dalzell, S.J.

Case 2:02-cv-04174-SD Document 2 Filed 07/10/2002 Page 2 of 2
Case 2:03-cv-04735-JG Document 76 Filed 02/12/08 Page 1 of 26
Case 2:03-cv-04735-JG Document 76 Filed 02/12/08 Page 2 of 26
Case 2:03-cv-04735-JG Document 76 Filed 02/12/08 Page 3 of 26
Case 2:03-cv-04735-JG Document 76 Filed 02/12/08 Page 4 of 26
Case 2:03-cv-04735-JG Document 76 Filed 02/12/08 Page 5 of 26
Case 2:03-cv-04735-JG Document 76 Filed 02/12/08 Page 6 of 26
Case 2:03-cv-04735-JG Document 76 Filed 02/12/08 Page 7 of 26
Case 2:03-cv-04735-JG Document 76 Filed 02/12/08 Page 8 of 26
Case 2:03-cv-04735-JG Document 76 Filed 02/12/08 Page 9 of 26
Case 2:03-cv-04735-JG Document 76 Filed 02/12/08 Page 10 of 26
Case 2:03-cv-04735-JG Document 76 Filed 02/12/08 Page 11 of 26
Case 2:03-cv-04735-JG Document 76 Filed 02/12/08 Page 12 of 26
Case 2:03-cv-04735-JG Document 76 Filed 02/12/08 Page 13 of 26
Case 2:03-cv-04735-JG Document 76 Filed 02/12/08 Page 14 of 26
Case 2:03-cv-04735-JG Document 76 Filed 02/12/08 Page 15 of 26
Case 2:03-cv-04735-JG Document 76 Filed 02/12/08 Page 16 of 26
Case 2:03-cv-04735-JG Document 76 Filed 02/12/08 Page 17 of 26
Case 2:03-cv-04735-JG Document 76 Filed 02/12/08 Page 18 of 26
Case 2:03-cv-04735-JG Document 76 Filed 02/12/08 Page 19 of 26
Case 2:03-cv-04735-JG Document 76 Filed 02/12/08 Page 20 of 26
Case 2:03-cv-04735-JG Document 76 Filed 02/12/08 Page 21 of 26
Case 2:03-cv-04735-JG Document 76 Filed 02/12/08 Page 22 of 26
Case 2:03-cv-04735-JG Document 76 Filed 02/12/08 Page 23 of 26
Case 2:03-cv-04735-JG Document 76 Filed 02/12/08 Page 24 of 26
Case 2:03-cv-04735-JG Document 76 Filed 02/12/08 Page 25 of 26
Case 2:03-cv-04735-JG Document 76 Filed 02/12/08 Page 26 of 26
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Quarterly Report of TenFold
Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert W. Felton, Chairman of the Board,
President, and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                                                                                                          
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                                                                                                          
|/s/ Robert W. Felton                                                                                                                      
|Robert W. Felton Chairman of the Board of
Directors, President, and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) November 1, 2006
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                           9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                       DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                          JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                            SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                         326
<SECURITIES>                                     0
<RECEIVABLES>                                4,609
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (850)
<INVENTORY>                                      0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                             8,371
<PP&E>                                      14,548
<DEPRECIATION>                              (5,769)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              23,709
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       10,392
<BONDS>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                            0
<PREFERRED>                                      0
<COMMON>                                        65
<OTHER-SE>                                       0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                23,709
<SALES>                                     22,536
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            22,536
<CGS>                                       15,413
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               15,413
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            24,617
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (17,440)
<INCOME-TAX>                                (6,014)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (11,426)
<DISCONTINUED>                                   0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                  0
<CHANGES>                                        0
<NET-INCOME>                               (11,426)
<EPS-BASIC>                               (1.780)
<EPS-DILUTED>                               (1.780)


</TABLE>
# C_2016016EN.01004401.xml

| 18.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 16/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 16/44

---

Action brought on 9 November 2015 — Tractel Greifzug v OHIM — Jiangsu Shenxi Construction Machinery (Shape of a motorised rope winch)

(Case T-621/15)

(2016/C 016/52)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Tractel Greifzug GmbH (Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) (represented by: U. Lüken and C. Maierhöfer, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Jiangsu Shenxi Construction Machinery Co. Ltd (Wuxi, China)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: Three-dimensional Community trade mark (Shape of a motorised rope winch) — Community trade mark No 7 033 061

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Invalidity proceedings

Procedure before OHIM

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 September 2015 in Case R 1658/2014-1

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision and reject the application for a declaration of invalidity in its entirety; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision and reject the application for a declaration of invalidity in its entirety;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(e)(ii) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE:

APPOINTMENT TO THE CRIMINAL

PROCEDURAL RULES COMMITTEE :

:

:

: NO. 520

CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL RULES

DOCKET

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW , this 15 th day of May, 2020, David R. Crowley, Esquire, Centre County

,

is hereby appointed as a member of the Criminal Procedural Rules Committee for a term

e xpiring March 1 , 2023.
Document

Exhibit 10.32

Amendment # 1 to
UPLAND SOFTWARE, INC.


EXECUTIVE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


    This Amendment #1 to the Executive Employment Agreement by and between Upland Software, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”) and Rodney C. Favaron (“Executive”) dated March 1, 2020 (“Original Agreement”), is entered into as of November 12, 2020.


RECITALS


WHEREAS, the Company and Executive desire to amend Paragraph 3(b) of the Original Agreement as of the Effective Date.
AMENDMENT


Paragraph 3(b) is hereby deleted and replaced in its entirety with the following:


    “3(b) Target Bonus. During the Employment Term, Executive will be eligible to receive an annual bonus targeted at 100% of Executive’s Base Salary, less applicable withholdings, upon achievement of performance objectives to be determined by the Board in its sole discretion, 50% of which shall be based upon achievement of Adjusted EBITDA targets and 50% of which shall be based upon the achievement of acquisitions targets (the “Target Bonus”).  Any Bonus will be earned only if the Company achieves the annual performance objectives during the designated time period and Executive is continuously employed by the Company on the date that such performance objectives are achieved.  The actual amount of the Bonus may be less than or greater than the Target Bonus based on the level at which the Company achieves the annual performance objectives during the designated time period.  The Company shall pay such Bonus at the same time as bonuses are normally paid to senior management, unless the Board approves an exception for payment of a particular bonus on a case by case basis, but in any event, any earned Bonus shall be paid no later than two months and 15 days after the end of the Company’s taxable year in which such Bonus was earned.”


Except as specified in this Amendment #1, all terms and conditions of the Original Agreement shall continue in full force and effect and otherwise remain unchanged.


    









Exhibit 10.32

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties has executed this Amendment # 1 to the Agreement, in the case of the Company by their duly authorized officers, as of the day and year first above written.


                            “COMPANY”
                            Upland Software, Inc.




                            By:  /s/ Kin Gill            
                            Name: Kin Gill
                            Title:  SVP, General Counsel and Secretary
    Address:    401 Congress Ave., Ste. 1850
        Austin, TX 78701


    “EXECUTIVE”


    /s/ Rodney Favaron        
    Rodney Favaron
    Address: