p. 1 

350983 

OPPT-2011-0182 RECFlVEl7 

OPPT CBIC 

63130000019 2ul3 OCT 30 AM 9~ 38 

V.O.C. Emissions Profiling of 

a Polyurethane Foam Sample 

Prepared for: 

By 

Brad Boyle, A.Sc.T. 

Saskatchewan Research Council 

Building Performance Unit 

Alternative Energy and Manufacturing Division 

SRC Publication No. 12650-1C09 

October 2009 

coMPANY SANITIZED 
V.O .C. Emissions Profiling of 

a Polyurethane Foam Sample 

Prepared for : 

by 

Brad Boyfe, A.Sc.T. 

Building Performance Unit 

Alternative Energy and Manufacturing Division 

Saskatchewan Research Council SRC Publication No. 

15 Innovation Boulevard 12650-7C09 

Saskatoon, Saskatchewan 

87N 2X8 October 2009 

Telephone: 306-933-5400 

Fax: 306-933-7446 
Confidential Report To VAC. Emissions Profiling of a 

' Polyurethane Foam Sample 

TABLE OF CONTENTS 

Page 

1 PRODUCT DESCRIPTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 

2 TEST OBJECTIVE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 

3 METHODOLOGY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 

3 .1 Storage and Preconditioning of the Product . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 

3 .2 Preparation of Test Chambers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 

3 .3 Mixing and Spraying Polyurethane Foam . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 

3 .4 Preparation of Foam Test Panel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 

3 .5 Headspace Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 

3.6 Dynamic Chamber Test Sample Preparation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 

3.7 Dynamic Chamber Analysis (Procedure B) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 

4 ANALYTICAL TEST TECHNIQUES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 

4.1 CarbotrapTM Samples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 

4.2 Calibration of Analytical Equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 

5 FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 

5 .1 Polyurethane Foam Application Equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 

5 .2 Analytical Instrumentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 

5 .3 Test Chambers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 

5 .4 Supply Air System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 

6 DESCRIPTION OF SAMPLE PANELS AND TEST SPECIMENS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 

7 DESCRIPTION OF TEST CONDITIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 

7.1 Sample Storage and Preparation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 

7.2 Headspace Chamber Air Sampling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 

7 .2 .1 Headspace Chamber Background Measurement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 

7.2.2 Test Specimen VOC ID Measurement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 

7.3 Dynamic Chamber Air Sampling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 

7.3.1 Dynamic Chamber Background Measurement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 

7.3.2 VOC Measurement #1 of Test Specimen (1-Hour test) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 

7.3 .3 VOC Measurement #2 of Test Specimen (1-Hour Re-test) . . . . . . . . . 7 

7.3 .4 VOC Measurement #3 of Test Specimen (12-Hour test) . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 

7 .3 .5 VOC Measurement #4 of Test Specimen (24-Hour test) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 

7 .3 .6 VOC Measurement #5 of Test Specimen (2-Day test) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 

7 .3 .7 VOC Measurement #6 of Test Specimen (4-Day test) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 

7 .3 .8 VOC Measurement #7 of Test Specimen (7-Day test) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 

7 .3 .9 VOC Measurement #8 of Test Specimen (14-Day test) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 

7 .3 .10 VOC Measurement #9 of Test Specimen (30-Day test) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 

Publication No. 12650-1C09 
V.O.C. Emissions Profiling of a Confidential Report To 

Polyurethane Foam Sample 

8 TEST RESULTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 

8.1 Background Measurement- Headspace Chamber . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 

8.2 Test Specimen VOC Identification - Headspace Chamber . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 

8 .3 Background Measurement - Dynamic Chamber . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 

8 .4 VOC Measurements - Dynamic Chamber (30 day test period) . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 

8 .4 .1 VOC Decay Measurement #1 - 1 hour . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 

8 .4 .2 VOC Decay Measurement #2 - 1 hour re-test . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., 11 

8 .4 .3 VOC Decay Measurement #3 -12 hours . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., . . . . . . . . . . . .  12 

8.4.4 VOC Decay Measurement #4 - 24 days . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., . . . . 12 

8.4.5 VOC Decay Measurement #5 - 2 days . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., . . . . . ., 12 

8.4 .6 VOC Decay Measurement #6 - 4 days . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 

8.4 .7 VOCDecay Measurement #7-7days . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., . ., . . ., . , 13 

8 .4 .8 VOC Decay Measurement #8 -14 days . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 

8 .4 .9 VOC Decay Measurement #9 - 30 days . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., . 13 

8.5 Table of Confidence of Identification -GC/MSD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 

9 ANALYSIS OF TEST RESULTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., . .  , . , .  14 

9.1 Table of Identified Compounds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., . . . ., . . ., . . . .  15 

9 .2 Table of Rate of Compound Decay . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., . . . ., . 16 

10 SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 

11 CONCLUSIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16 

12 SIGNATURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 

APPENDIX A -Analytical Method 

APPENDIX B -Witness Report 

SRC Publication No. 12650-1 C09 
Confidential Report To V.O.C. Emissions Profiling of a 

Polyurethane Foam Sample 

1 PRODUCT DESCRIPTION 

TYPE OF MATERIAL: The product tested was a spray-applied 

polyurethane thermal insulation product identified as The two 

components of this product were labeled as ; A-side: #A-100-4 ; and Bside: #B-500-F ; lot 9264 . The creation dates for the components were notated as 24 

August, 2009 and 05 August, 2009, respectively . 

SAMPLE RECEIVED: The sample was created on 26 August, 2009 at the 

facility in nder the supervision of 

of Exova / Bodycote Testing Group. The sample was in turn sealed air-tight 

and was transported via overnight courier to the SRC Building Performance laboratory 

in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan. 

2 TEST OBJECTIVE 

The testing objective was to identify and quantify volatile organic compound (VOC) 

emissions from the spray-applied polyurethane thermal insulation 

using Procedure 'B' of the Underwriters Laboratories of Canada (ULC) 

CAN/ULC-S774-09 Standard . 

3 METHODOLOGY 

3.1 Storage and Pre-conditioning of Product 

The two drums containing components A and B of the spray-applied polyurethane foam 

were stored at the facility in Boisbriand at 24.0°C (75°F) and 65% 

relative humidity for periods of; 2 days tor the A-side component and 21 days for the Bside component, prior to testing . 

It was advised that oolicy limits storage duration to 6 months 

prior to use of the product, per the Exova Witness Report, refer to Appendix 8 -

Witness Report. 

3.2 Preparation of Test Chambers 

Prior to receiving the insulation sample and following the assembly of the test chambers 

and associated equipment, all systems were run-up to test conditions and allowed to 

stabilize for a period in excess of 72 hours . In preparation of the test, background 

measurements were taken on each chamber 04 August, 2009 to ensure contamination 

levels did not exceed the maximum allowable background level (i .e . 2% of the 

permissible indoor air concentration limit for any compounds identified) . 

SRC Publication No. 12650-1C09 1 
V.O.C. Emissions Profiling of a Confidential Report To 

Polyurethane Foam Sample 

3 .3 Mixing and Spraying the Polyurethane Foam 

Components A and B, as identified in Section 1, were mixed and sprayed at 

approximatelv 11 :10am local time, Wednesday, 26 August, 2009 at the 

a qualified insulation sprayer 

in accoraance with CAN/ULC-S774-09 . The 

spraying procedure was independently witnessed by Mr. David Rousseau of Exova / 

Bodycote Testing Group. 

3.4 Preparation of the Foam Test Panel 

The polyurethane thermal insulation test panel was produced using a commercially 

available, fixed ratio, positive displacement pump. This unit is specifically designed for 

the application of sprayed polyurethane thermal insulation. See Section 5.1 . 

In accordance with the testing standard, the product was sprayed upon a polyethylene 

board covered with aluminum foil to create a panel . The sample piece was cut from the 

centre of the panel at a location where the foil separated the sample from the PE board. 

The sample was then sealed air-tight in a new Tedlar bag and placed in a sealed case 

for immediate transport to SRC facilities . 

3.5 Headspace Analysis 

A test specimen was cut from the sample piece on 27 August, 2009 at SRC, Saskatoon, 

and installed in the headspace chamber (0.33 litre volume). The chamber was then 

sealed and maintained at 40°C (104°F) for 24 hours. On 28 August, 2009 an air sample 

was drawn from the headspace chamber. 

The headspace analysis is useful when concentration levels of compounds in the 1 and 

12 hour tests are too low for identification by mass spectral library . The headspace 

apparatus often generates higher concentrations of compounds that volatilize quickly. 

In most situations, the headspace analysis is not required since the concentrations are 

of sufficient strength during the regular chamber tests . 

3.6 Dynamic Chamber Test Sample Preparation 

On 27 August, 2009 the sample was removed from its air-tight packaging and was cut 

into appropriately sized and shaped pieces for introduction into the dynamic chamber. 

The specimens were freshly cut on all six sides. 

The dynamic-chamber portions of the sample were cut into two (2) thicknesses of 

25mm and were installed into stainless steel specimen holders. The exposed surface 

area provided a chamber loading ratio of 0 .5 square metres per cubic metre (M2/M3) . 

One specimen was introduced to the 51 .2 litre stainless steel dynamic chamber 

(specimen #1) while the other specimen (specimen #2) was retained in an airtight glass 

2 SRC Publication No. 12650-1C09 
Confidential Report To V.O.C. Emissions Profiling of a 

Polyurethane Foam Sample 

vessel . The headspace-chamber portion of the sample (specimen #3 - refer to Section 

3 .5) was introduced to the headspace chamber to occupy approximately 50% of the 

0.33 litre volume . 

The introduction of the sample to the dynamic chamber occurred at 09:08am local time; 

23 hours and 58 minutes after spraying . This is in accordance with the testing 

standard's requirement for the test to commence within 24 hours of the sample's 

production (CAN/ULC-S774-09 ; Section 6 .1 .2) . 

3.7 Dynamic Chamber Analysis (Procedure B) 

The dynamic test chamber was operated in an environmental enclosure with the air 

sampling apparatus mounted externally . Air samples to determine chamber emission 

concentrations were taken at the specified time intervals as prescribed in the CAN/ULC 

Standard, CAN/ULC-S774-09 ; air samples were drawn at 1, 12, 24 and 48 hours and 

days 4, 7, 14 and 30 (Refer to Section 7.3) . The air samples were then analyzed as 

described in Section 4 and Appendix A - Analytical Method. 

4 ANALYTICAL TECHNIQUES 

CarbotrapTM 400 absorbent tubes, in conjunction with gas chromatograph / mass 

selective detector (GC/MSD) analysis, were utilized for all air sampling sessions to 

identify and quantify volatile organic compound emissions from the sample. All air 

sampling flow rates and times were strictly observed, as defined within the testing 

standard, to ensure the product's emissions profile was accurately captured and related . 

4.1 CarbotrapTM Samples 

The Carbotrap "M 400 adsorbent tubes were thermally desorbed using a Supelco thermal 

desorption unit at 300°C (572°F) for three minutes. Any volatilized compounds are 

directed into the GC/MSD for compound identification and quantitation . The 

quantitation of the compounds may be achieved by several protocols: 

1) using toluene response factor for semi-quantitative estimate of compound 

concentration, 

2) using response factor of a compound in the same family as the detected 

compound, for a more accurate semi-quantitative estimate, or 

3) using response factor for the pure standard of the detected compound for a 

quantitative measurement. 

The normal protocol that is used for quantitation is number (1) . Protocol (2) is 

significantly more costly since several pure compounds (if available) would be required 

to be purchased and much more time is required to perform the calibrations . Protocol 

(3) is the most costly since each detected compound needs to be purchased as a pure 

standard (often they are not readily available) and time is required to prepare each 

calibration standard. 

SRC Publication No. 12650-1C09 
V.O.C. Emissions Profiling of a Confidential Report To 

Polyurethane Foam Sample 

4.2 Calibration of Analytical Equipment 

Appendix A details the Quality Control procedures and calibration methods . 

5 FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT 

5.1 Polyurethane Foam Application Equipment 

The sample panel was prepared in using the following equipment: 

Pump Equipment: Make: Gusmer - 1 :1 ratio 

Model: H20/35 - 1000psi 

Spray Gun : Graco model AP Fusion with AR 5252 mix chamber 

Temperatures : A-side component: 53°C (127°F) 

B-side component: 53°C (127°F) 

Hose : 53°C (127°F) 

6.2 Analytical Instrumentation 

The following equipment was used to capture and analyze the air samples : 

Supelco Carbotrap- 400 tubes 

Supelco Thermal Desorption Unit (TDU) 

Gas Chromatography: Hewlett Packard ; 

- model 5890 Gas Chromatograph 

- model 5971 Mass Selective Detector 

- model HP-5 capillary column, 30m x 0.20mm 

Windows ChemStation Data System 

Wiley 138K Mass Spectral Database 

5.3 Test Chambers 

The two test chambers used in the testing consist of: 

Dynamic chamber: 51 .2 litre stainless steel chamber 

Headspace chamber: 0.33 litre glassiTeflon chamber 

5.4 Supply Air System 

Clean air is generated and delivered to the chamber via oil-less compressor drawing 

ambient air followed by multi-stage filtration for removal of trace organics . Air 

distribution is provided via stainless steel (rigid), Teflon (semi-rigid) and Tygone HighPurity (flexible) tubing. Humidification and temperature are controlled to test condition 

set-points prior to introduction into the chambers . 

4 SRC Publication No. 12650-1C09 
Confidential Renort To V.O.C. Emissions Profiling of a 

Polyurethane Foam Sample 

6 DESCRIPTION OF SAMPLE PANEL AND TEST SPECIMENS 

Sample Panel Description : 

Dimensions : 800mm X 1100mm X 150mm THK 

Number of Panels: One 

Number of Foam Layers : One 

Test Specimen Description for Dynamic Chambers : 

Dimensions : 163mm x 163mm x 25mm 

Number of Specimens: Two 

Chamber Loading Factor: 0 .5 M2/M3 

7 DESCRIPTION OF TEST CONDITIONS 

7.1 Sample Storage and Preparation 

CHEMICAL PRECONDITIONING 

CONSTITUENTS CREATED - DATE: A-Side : 24-Aug-09 B-Side : 05-Au -09 

STORAGE TEMPERATURE: 24.0°C 75.2°F 

STORAGE RELATIVE HUMIDITY: 65°/u 

STORAGE DURATION : A-Side : 02 Days 

B-Side : 21 Days 

FOAM APPLICATION 

SPRAYING - DATE / TIME: 26-Au -09 / 11 :10 hrs Quebec local time) * ROOM TEMPERATURE: 24.0°C 75.2°F 

ROOM RELATIVE HUMIDITY: 65% 

PRIMARY HEATER TEMPERATURES 

ON SPRAY EQUIPMENT: A-Side : 53°C 127°F B-Side : 53°C 127°F 

HOSE HEATER TEMPERATURE: 53°C 127°F 

SAMPLE PANEL CURING 

CURING START -DATE /TIME: 26-Aug-09 / 11 :10 hrs Quebec local time)* ROOM TEMPERATURE: Unmonitored ; in-transit 

ROOM RELATIVE HUMIDITY: Unmonitored; in-transit 

AIR EXCHANGE RATE: Zero A.C.H. ; sealed air-ti ght 

CURE PERIOD DURATION: 23 hours, 58 minutes 

TEST SPECIMENS 

TEST START - DATE / TIME: 27-Au -,09 / 09:08 hrs Sask. local time * 

LABORATORY ROOM TEMPERATURE: 23°C ± 2°C 

II LABORATORY RELATIVE HUMIDITY: 50°/u ± 5% 

N DURATION OF TEST: 30 days 

During the month of August, Saskatchewan (which does not participate m Daylight Savings Time) is two hours behind Quebec time . 

SRC Publication No. 12650-1C09 5 
V.O.C. Emissions Profiling of a Confidential Report To Polyurethane Foam Sample 

7 .2 Headspace Chamber Air Sampling 

7.2 .1 Heads ace Chamber Background Measurement 

CHAMBER 

TEST START - DATE / TIME: 04 Au ust, 2009 / 11 :28 hrs 

CHAMBER TEMPERATURE: 40°C 

CHAMBER RELATIVE HUMIDITY: Uncontrolled 

CHAMBER VOLUME : 0 .33 litres 

DURATION OF AIR PURGE: >72 hrs. 

AIR FLOW RATE: 200 ml/min ± 5% 

AIR SOURCE: High Purity Air System 

COLLECTION MEDIA 

SORBENT TUBE: Su elco Carbotra T^^ 400 #2-0359 

SAMPLING DURATION: 60 mins 

SAMPLING AIR FLOW RATE: 200 ml/min ± 5% 

7.2.2 Headspace Chamber VOC Identification Measurement 

CHAMBER 

TEST START - DATE / TIME: 28 Aug ust, 2009 / 10:12 hrs 

CHAMBER TEMPERATURE: 40° ± 2°C 

CHAMBER RELATIVE HUMIDITY: Uncontrolled 

CHAMBER VOLUME: 0.33 litres 

DURATION OF AIR PURGE: 3 hrs. 

AIR FLOW RATE: 200 ml/min ± 5% 

AIR SOURCE: High Purity Air System 

COLLECTION MEDIA 

SORBENT TUBE: Su elco Carbotra TM 400 #2-0359 

SAMPLING DURATION : 

_ 

15 mins 

SAMPLING AIR FLOW RATE : 200 ml/min t 5% 

7.3 Dynamic Chamber Air Sampling 

7 .3 .1 Dynamic Chamber Background Measurement 

CHAMBER 

TEST START - DATE / TIME: 04 August, 2009 / 10:26 hrs 

CHAMBER TEMPERATURE: 40° t 2°C 

CHAMBER RELATIVE HUMIDITY: 50 ± 5% 

CHAMBER VOLUME: 51 .2 litres 

DURATION OF AIR PURGE: >72 hrs. 

AIR FLOW RATE: 256 ml/min ± 5% 

AIR SOURCE : Hig h Purity Air System 

COLLECTION MEDIA 

SORBENT TUBE : Su elco Carbotra T^^ 400 #2-0359 

SAMPLING DURATION: 60 mins 

I SAMPLING AIR FLOW RATE: 200 ml/min ± 5% 

6 SRC Publication No. 12650-1C09 
Confidential Report To V.O.C. Emissions Profiling of a 

Polyurethane Foam Sample 

7 .3 .2 Test Specimen VOC Measurement #1 - Hour-1 test 

CHAMBER 

TEST START - DATE / TIME : 27 August, 2009 / 10:08 hrs 

CHAMBER TEMPERATURE: 40° ± 2°C 

CHAMBER RELATIVE HUMIDITY: 50 ± 5% 

CHAMBER VOLUME: 51 .2 litres 

AIR FLOW RATE: Unknown** 

AIR SOURCE: High Purity Air System 

COLLECTION MEDIA 

SORBENT TUBE: Su elco Carbotra T"" 400 #2-0359 

SAMPLING DURATION: 42 mins** 

~ SAMPLING AIR FLOW RATE : 200 ml/min ± 5% 

' SAMPLING INTERVAL: Hour 1 of 30 days 

*" At 42 minutes into the 60 minute test it was discovered that a valve in parallel to the sampling train was open, thereby allowing an 

unspecifed airflow to pass over the sample with only a portion of the exhaust from the chamber passing through the testing media. 

The test was terminated and a re-test was performed immediately vhth the valves in proper configuration and at the correct flowrate . 

7.3.3 Test Specimen VOC Measurement #2 - Hour-1 Re-test 

CHAMBER 

TEST START - DATE / TIME: 27 August, 2009 / 10:50 hrs 

CHAMBER TEMPERATURE: 40° ± 2°C 

CHAMBER RELATIVE HUMIDITY: 50 ± 5% i 

CHAMBER VOLUME : 51 .2 litres 

AIR FLOW RATE: 256 ml/min ± 5% 

AIR SOURCE: Hig h Purity Air System 

COLLECTION MEDIA 

SORBENT TUBE : Su elco Carbotra T^^ 400 #2-0359 

SAMPLING DURATION: 60 mins 

SAMPLING AIR FLOW RATE: 200 ml/min ± 5% 

SAMPLING INTERVAL: Hour 1 of 30 days 

7.3.4 Test Specimen VOC Measurement #3 - Hour-12 test 

CHAMBER 

TEST START - DATE / TIME: 27 August, 2009 / 21 :08 hrs 

CHAMBER TEMPERATURE: 40° t 2°C 

CHAMBER RELATIVE HUMIDITY: 50 ± 5% 

CHAMBER VOLUME: 51 .2 litres 

AIR FLOW RATE: 256 ml/min ± 5% 

AIR SOURCE: High Purity Air System 

COLLECTION MEDIA 

SORBENT TUBE : Su elco Carbotra T^^ 400 #2-0359 

SAMPLING DURATION: 60 mins 

SAMPLING AIR FLOW RATE : 200 ml/min t 5% 

SAMPLING INTERVAL: Hour 12 of 30 days 

SRC Publication No. 12650-1C09 7 
V.O.C. Emissions Profiling of a Confidential Report To Polyurethane Foam Sample 

7.3.5 Test Specimen VOC Measurement #4 - Hour-24 test 

CHAMBER 

TEST START - DATE / TIME: 28 Aug ust, 2009 / 09:08 hrs 

CHAMBER TEMPERATURE: 40° ± 2°C 

CHAMBER RELATIVE HUMIDITY: 50 ± 5% 

CHAMBER VOLUME : 51 .2 litres 

AIR FLOW RATE : 256 ml/min ± 5% 

AIR SOURCE: Hig h Purity Air System 

COLLECTION MEDIA 

SORBENT TUBE: Su elco Carbotra TM 400 #2-0359 

SAMPLING DURATION: 60 mins 

SAMPLING AIR FLOW RATE: 200 ml/min ± 5% 

SAMPLING INTERVAL: Hour 24 of 30 days 

7 .3 .6 Test Specimen VOC Measurement #5 - ( Day-2 test 

CHAMBER 

TEST START - DATE / TIME : 29 August, 2009 / 09:08 hrs 

CHAMBER TEMPERATURE: 40° ± 2°C 

CHAMBER RELATIVE HUMIDITY : 50 ± 5% 

CHAMBER VOLUME: 51 .2 litres 

AIR FLOW RATE: 256 ml/min ± 5% 

AIR SOURCE: Hi h Purit Air System 

COLLECTION MEDIA 

SORBENT TUBE: Su elco Carbotra ~ 400 #2-0359 

SAMPLING DURATION : 60 mins 

SAMPLING AIR FLOW RATE : 200 ml/min ± 5% 

SAMPLING INTERVAL: Day 2 of 30 days 

7.3 .7 Test S pecimen VOC Measurement #6 - Da -4 test 

CHAMBER 

TEST START - DATE / TIME: 31 August, 2009 / 09:08 hrs 

CHAMBER TEMPERATURE: 40° ± 2°C 

CHAMBER RELATIVE HUMIDITY: 50 ± 5% 

CHAMBER VOLUME : 51 .2 litres 

AIR FLOW RATE: 256 ml/min ± 5% 

AIR SOURCE : Hi h Purit Air System 

COLLECTION MEDIA 

SORBENT TUBE : Su elco Carbotra TM 400 #2-0359 

SAMPLING DURATION: 60 mins 

SAMPLING AIR FLOW RATE: 200 ml/min ± 5% 

SAMPLING INTERVAL: Day 4 of 30 

SRC Publication No. 12650-1C09 
Confidential Report To V.O.C. Emissions Profiling of a 

Polyurethane Foam Sample 

7.3.8 Test Specimen VOC Measurement #7 - (Day-7 test) 

CHAMBER 

TEST START - DATE / TIME : 03 Se ptember, 2009 / 09:08 hrs 

CHAMBER TEMPERATURE : 40° ± 2°C 

CHAMBER RELATIVE HUMIDITY: 50 ± 5% 

CHAMBER VOLUME : 51 .2 litres 

AIR FLOW RATE : 256 ml/min t 5% 

AIR SOURCE: High Purity Air System 

COLLECTION MEDIA 

SORBENT TUBE: Su elco Carbotra T"" 400 #2-0359 

SAMPLING DURATION : 60 mins 

SAMPLING AIR FLOW RATE: 200 ml/min ± 5% 

~ SAMPLING INTERVAL: Day 7 of 30 

7.3 .9 Test Specimen VOC Measurement #8 - ( Day-14 test 

CHAMBER 

TEST START - DATE / TIME : 10 September, 2009 / 09:08 hrs 

CHAMBER TEMPERATURE: 40° ± 2°C 

CHAMBER RELATIVE HUMIDITY: 50 ± 5% 

CHAMBER VOLUME : 51 .2 litres 

AIR FLOW RATE: 256 ml/min ± 5% 

AIR SOURCE: High Purity Air System 

COLLECTION MEDIA 

SORBENT TUBE: Su elco Carbotra T°" 400 #2-0359 

SAMPLING DURATION : 60 mins 

SAMPLING AIR FLOW RATE: 200 ml/min ± 5% 

SAMPLING INTERVAL: Day 14 of 30 

7.3 .10 Test Specimen VOC Measurement #9 - (Day-30 test) 

CHAMBER 

TEST START - DATE / TIME : 26 September, 2009 / 09:08 hrs 

CHAMBER TEMPERATURE: 40° t 2°C 

CHAMBER RELATIVE HUMIDITY: 50 ± 5% 

CHAMBER VOLUME : 51 .2 litres 

AIR FLOW RATE : 256 ml/min ± 5% 

AIR SOURCE: Hi gh Purity Air System 

COLLECTION MEDIA 

SORBENT TUBE: Su ellco Carbotra T"' 400 #2-0359 

SAMPLING DURATION: 60 mins 

SAMPLING AIR FLOW RATE: 200 ml/min± 5% 

~ SAMPLING INTERVAL: Day 30 of 30 

SRC Publication No. 12650-1C09 9 
V.O.C. Emissions Profiling of a Confidential Report To 

Polyurethane Foam Sample 

8 TEST RESULTS 

COMPOUND IDENTIFIED CONFIDENCE 

OF I .D.' 

AMOUNT 

DETECTED 

AIR 

CONCENTRATION 

(mg/m) 

Clean -- -- -- 

Detection Limit 0.05 0.004 

Total Volume of Air Sample 12.0 litres 

8 .1 Background Measurement -Headspace Chamber 

Table 8.1 BP Iden : DEM-2 

- Note' - Confidence of Identification -Refer forward to Section 8.5 

- pg = microgram [one millionth (10) of a gram] 

- mg/m' = milligram [one thousandth (10"') of a gram] per cubic metre 

- BP Iden = Building Performance sample identification tag 

8 .2 Test Specimen VOC Identification - Headspace Chamber 

Table 8.2 BP Iden : DEM-6 

COMPOUND IDENTIFIED CONFIDENCE 

OF I .D. 

AMOUNT 

DETECTED 

AIR 

CONCENTRATION 

(mg/m3) 

Pentafluoro ro ane 4 0 .089 0.030 

Dich[oro ro ane 3 0.320 0.107 

Methyl dioxane 3 0.056 0.019 

Dimeth I dioxane 3 0.540 0 .180 

Trimeth I dioxolane 2 0.460 0.153 

Detection Limit 0 .05 0.004 

Total Volume of Air Sample 3 .0 litres 

Refer to Table 8.1 for table notes . 

8.3 Background Measurement-Dynamic Chamber 

Table 8.3 BP Iden: DEW 

COMPOUND IDENTIFIED CONFIDENCE 

OF I .D. 

AMOUNT 

DETECTED 

AIR 

CONCENTRATION 

(mg/m3) 

Clean -- -- -- 

Detection Limit 0.05 0.004 

Total Volume of Air Samp le 12 .0 litres 

Refer to Table 8.1 for table notes. 

10 SRC Publication No. 12650-1C09 
Confidential Reoort To V.O.C. Emissions Profiling of a 

Polyurethane Foam Sample 

8 .4 VOC Measurements -Dynamic Chamber (30-day test period) 

Polyurethane Specimen #1 

8.4 .1 VOC Decay Measurement #1 - Hour-1 : Note this test was interrupted when it was 

discovered that a valve in parallel to the sampling train was open thereby risking dilution 

of the air passing through the testing media . The below values reflect emissions 

captured after 42 minutes, when the test was terminated. A re-test was started 

immediately, refer to Table 8.4 .2 

Table 8.4 .1 BP Iden: DEM-3 

COMPOUND IDENTIFIED 

[synonym] 

CONFIDENCE 

OF I .D. 

AMOUNT 

DETECTED 

AIR 

CONCENTRATION 

(mg/m3) 

Pentafluoro ro ane 1 0 .331 0.039 

Dichloropropane 

[propylene dichloride 

1 0 .964 0.115 

Methyl dioxane 3 0.267 0.032 

Methyl benzene toluene 2 0.445 0.053 

Trimeth I dioxolane 2 1 .988 0.237 

Dimeth I dioxane 2 3.620 0.431 

Chlorobenzene 1 1 .246 0.148 

Propane ox bis chloro 1 0.475 0.057 

Dimetho prop ane 4 0.297 0.035 

_Trimeth I ro anoic acid 3 3.635 0.433 

Detection Limit 0.05 0.004 

Total Volume of Air Sample 8.4 litres 

efer to Table 8.1 for table notes. 

8.4.2 VOC Decay Measurement #2 - Hour-1 Re-Test: 

Table 8.4 .2 BP Iden : DEM-3R 

COMPOUND IDENTIFIED CONFIDENCE 

OF I .D. 

AMOUNT 

DETECTED 

AIR 

CONCENTRATION 

(mg/m3) 

Pentafluoro ro ane 1 0.226 0.019 

Methyl dioxane 4 0 .119 0.010 

Meth I benzene toluene 3 0.148 0 .012 

Trimeth I dioxolane 3 1 .009 0 .084 

Dimeth I dioxane 2 2.255 0.188 

Chlorobenzene 1 0.816 0.068 

Propane o bis chloro 3 0 .534 0.045 

Dimetho pro pane 4 0 .297 0.025 

Phenox ethanol 4 0 .297 0 .025 

Detection Limit 0.06 0.004 

Total Volume of Air Sample 12.0 litres 

Refer to Table 8.1 for table notes. 

SRC Publication No. 12650-1C09 11 
1/.O.C. Emissions Profiling of a Confidential Revort To Polyureth ane Foam Sample 

8.4 .3 VOC Decay Measurement #3 - Hour-12 : 

Table 8.4 .3 

COMPOUND IDENTIFIED , CONFIDENCE 

OF I .D. 

AMOUNT 

DETECTED 

AIR 

CONCENTRATION 

(mg/m) 

Pentafluoro ro ane 1 0 .742 0.062 

Methyl ro anamine 4 0 .801 0.067 

Detection Limit 0.06 0.004 

Total Volume of Air Sample 12 .0 litres 

Refer to Table 8.1 for table notes . 

8 .4 .4 VOC Decay Measurement #4 - Hour-24: 

Table 8.4.4 

COMPOUND IDENTIFIED CONFIDENCE 

OF I .D . 

AMOUNT 

DETECTED 

AIR 

CONCENTRATION 

(mg/m3) 

Pentafluoro ro ane 1 0.511 0.043 

Pentamethyl dipropylenetriamine 

alk I amine 

4 38.58 3.215 

Detection Limit 0.06 0.004 

Total Volume of Air Sample 12 .0 litres 

Refer to Table 8.1 for table notes . 

8 .4 .5 VOC Decay Measurement #5 - Day-2: 

Table 8.4 .6 BP Iden: DEM-7 

COMPOUND IDENTIFIED CONFIDENCE 

OF I .D. 

AMOUNT 

DETECTED 

AIR 

CONCENTRATION 

(mg/m3) 

Clean -- -- -- 

Detection Limit 0.06 0.004 

j Total Volume of Air Sample I 

_ 

12 .0 litres 

Refer to Table 8.1 for table notes. 

8 .4 .6 VOC Decay Measurement #6 - Day-4: 

Table 8.4 .6 BP Iden : DEM-8 

COMPOUND IDENTIFIED CONFIDENCE 

OF I .D. 

AMOUNT 

DETECTED 

AIR 

CONCENTRATION 

(mg/m) 

Clean -- -- -- 

_ Detection Limit 

I 

0.05 0.004 

j Total Volume of Air Sample 12.0 litres 

Refer to Table 8.1 for table notes . 

BP Iden: DEM-4 

BP Iden: DEM-5 

12 SRC Publication No. 12650-1C09 
Confirlonti-r aonnrt To V.O.C. Emissions Profiling of a 

Polyurethane Foam Sample 

8 .4 .7 VOC Decay Measurement #7 - Day-7 : 

Table 8.4 .7 BP Iden : DEM-9 

COMPOUND IDENTIFIED CONFIDENCE 

OF I .D. 

AMOUNT 

DETECTED 

AIR 

CONCENTRATION 

(mg/m3) 

Clean 

Detection Limit 0.05 0 .004 

Total Volume of Air Sample 

- 

l 12.0 litres 

Refer to Table 8 .1 for table notes . 

8 .4 .8 VOC Decay Measurement #8 - Day-14 : 

Table 8.4.8 BP [den: DEM-10 

COMPOUND IDENTIFIED CONFIDENCE 

OF I .D. 

AMOUNT 

DETECTED 

AIR 

CONCENTRATION 

(mg/m3) 

Clean 

Detection Limit 0.05 0.004 

Total Volume of Air Sample 12.0 litres; 

Refer to Table 8.1 for table notes . 

8.4 .9 VOC Decay Measurement #9 - Day-30: 

Table 8.4.9 BP Iden : EL-11 

COMPOUND IDENTIFIED CONFIDENCE 

OF I .D. 

AMOUNT 

DETECTED 

AIR 

CONCENTRATION 

(mg/m3) 

Clean -- 

Detection Limit 0 .05 0.004 

Total Volume of Air Sample 12 .0 litres 

Refer to Table 8.1 for table notes. 

SRC Publication No. 12650-1C09 13 
V.O.C. Emissions Profiling of a Confidential Report To 

Polyurethane Foam Sample 

8.5 Table of Confidence of Identification - GC/MSD 

Table 8.5 

ASSIGNED VALUE DESCRIPTION 

1 High confidence ; clean spectra, excellent match with library 

- spectrum . >90% 

Mass spectrum has small spectral differences from library match. A 

2 good comparison. Reference compound required for positive 

identification . 75-89% 

3 Possible compound or similar structure type. Spectrum is 

contaminated with other features . Reference compound required for 

positive identification . 50-74% 

4 Evidence of possible structure and possibly molecular weight range. 

_ - ----- 

Compound is poor identification . (20-49%) 

5 ~ Unable to identify. (<20%) 

9 ANALYSIS OF TEST RESULTS 

The dynamic chamber testing yielded the detection of thirteen (13) unique volatile 

organic compounds: 

" The first (partial) 1-Hour test identified ten (10) compounds 

" The 1-Hour Re-test identified nine (9) compounds 

" The 12-Hour test identified two (2) compounds 

" The 1-Day test identified two (2) compounds 

" The tests conducted on days 2, 4, 7, 14 and 30 found no compounds at 

detectable levels 

Permissible concentrations in indoor air are calculated using the time weighted average 

(TWA) exposure value found in the American Conference of Government Industrial 

Hygienists (ACGIH) - Threshold Limit Values Handbook. 2009 to calculate the 

compound's threshold limit value (TLV) . 

Determining threshold limit values (TLVs) in milligrams per cubic metre (mg/m) is done 

by taking the TWA values presented in the reference literature in parts-per-million (ppm) 

and multiplying that value by the compound's molecular weight (MW) then dividing the 

product by the constant 24 .45. 

TLV [mg/m3] = 1TWA fppml x MW of compound) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (Eq. 1) 

24.45 

These values are further divided by 100 to yield a value of 1 % of the listed occupational 

exposure (8 hours per day - 40 hours per week) levels . This is industry protocol for 

14 SRC Publication No. 12650-1C09 
Confidential Report To V-0-C. Emissions Profiling of a 

Polyurethane Foam Sample 

establishing figures suitable for residential exposure (24 hours per day - 7 days per 

week) levels and is in accordance with Section 9.4 of the testing Standard . 

Of the thirteen (13) compounds detected, ten (10) are not present in the reference 

literature to provide TWA values (indicated as "Note 1" in Table 9 .1) . Of the three (3) 

compounds with values available for comparison, none produced emissions at levels 

exceeding their respective TI-V/1 00 value during the testing period. 

9.1 Table of Identified Compounds 

Table 9.1 Heads ace concentration values are not included in this table 

Compound 

[synonym] 

Confidence 

of I .D. 

(refer to 

Table 8.5 

Threshold 

Limit 

Value/100 

(mg/ma) 

Maximum 

Measured 

Concentration 

m /m3 

Detection 

Limit 

(mg/m3) 

1 Pentafluoro ro ane 1 Note 1 0 .062 0.004 

2 Dichloropropane 

a.k.a . propylene dichloride 1 0.462 

_ 

0.115 0.004 

3 Methyl dioxane 3 Note 1 0.032 0.004 

4 Dimeth I dioxane 2 Note 1 0.431 0.004 

5 Trimeth I dioxolane 3 Note 1 

_ 

0.237 0 .004 

6 Chlorobenzene 1 0.460 0.150 0.004 

7 Propane o bis chloro 1 Note 1 0 .056 0.004 

8 Dimetho pro pane 4 Note 1 0.035 0.004 

9 Trimeth I ro anoic acid 3 Note 1 0.433 0.00T-- 

10 Methyl benzene 

a.k.a. toluene 2 0.754 

_ 

0.053 0 .004 

11 Phenox ethanol 4 Note 1 0.025 0 .004 

12 Methyl ro anamine 4 Note 1 

_ 

0.067 0.004 

13 Pentamethyl dipropylenetriamine 

(a .k.a . alkyl amine) 4 Note 1 j 3.215 0.004 

- Note 1 : The identified compound is not listed in the reference literature to provide TWA values for calculation . 

- Confidence of ID values may vary from test to test . Values shown above reflect the highest confidence achieved during testing . 

The measured compounds, relative to their respective compound number assigned in 

Table 9.1 and their concentrations (mg/m3) recorded during the test, are presented in 

Table 9 .2 on the following page . 

SRC Publication No. 12650-1C09 15 
V.O.C. Emissions Profiling of a Confidential Report To 

Polyurethane Foam Sample 

9 .2 Table of Rate of Compound Decay 

Table 9.2 

Compound 1-Hr 1-Hr 

Re-test 

12-Hr 24-Hr 2-Day 4-Day 7-Day 14-Day 30-Day 

1 0.039 0 .019 0.062 0.043 - - - - - 

2 0 .115 - - - - - - - - 

3 0.032 0.010 - - - - - - - 

4 0.431 0.190 - - - - - - - 

5 0.237 0.084 - - - - - - - 

6 0.150 0.068 - - - - - - - 

7 0.056 0.044 - - - - - - - 

8 0.035 0.025 - - - - - - - 

9 0.433 - - - - - - - - 

10 0.053 0.012 - - - - - - - 

11 - 0.025 - - - - - - - 

12 -_ 

_ 

- 0.067 - - - - - - 

13 ~~ - ~ - - 3.21 - - - - - 

- Bold entries indicate the test with the highest observed concentration for each compound 

- Dashes ( -) indicate the compound was not present at detectable levels during the test 

-All values are expressed in milligrams per cubic meter (mg/m') 

10 SUMMARY 

There were detectable VOC emissions from the 

product for a minimum of 24 hours of the 30-day test. 

Ten (10) of the thirteen (13) compounds detected during the chamber testing are not 

listed in the ACGIH TLV Handbook (2009) to provide TWA values for calculation . 

Therefore a toxicological review and assessment of the testing data is recommended, 

per Section 9 .3 of the Standard. 

None of the three (3) compounds with values available for comparison exceeded their 

respective TLV/100 values during the testing period . 

11 CONCLUSIONS 

1 . Testing performed in accordance with CAN/ULC-S774-09 produced an 

emissions profile containing thirteen (13) unique volatile organic compounds . 

The stipulated reference literature (ACGIH TLV Handbook, 2009) does not 

contain information relating to ten (10) of these compounds . Therefore, 

testing results for the Are 

deemed inconclusive, pending an asscbsnient from a toxicologist . 

16 SRC Publication No. 12650-1C09 
Confidential Report To V.0-C. Emissions Profiling of a 

Polyurethane Foam Sample 

2. In accordance with prior arrangements made with 

copy of this report shall be furnished to Dr. Lalita Bharadwaj, Toxicologist, for 

further assessment. Please contact Dr. Bharadwaj directly if seeking further 

information regarding her toxicological assessment of this product. 

Dr. Lalita Bharadwaj 

University of Saskatchewan, College of Nursing 

Saskatoon, SK 

Tel: (306)966-1490 Fax: (306)966-6703 

Ialita-bharadwaiCa?usask .ca 

SRC Publication No. 12650-1C09 17 
V.O.C. Emissions Profiling of a Confidential Renort To 

Polyurethane Foam Sample 

12 SIGNATURES 

Laboratory testing conducted by: 

Brad Boyle, A.Sc.T. 

Research Technologist, Building Performance Unit 

Chemical analysis data reviewed and approved by: 

Dr. Wo Yuen 

Principal Scientist, SRC Analytical Services 

Test Report Reviewed and Approved by: 

LA J~ 

Ra'y Sidber, IdI .Sc., P .Eng. 

Manager, Building Performance Unit 

Zo OeM6W-1 

Dated 

18 SRC Publication No. 12650-1C09 
Confidential Report To V.O.C. Emissions Profiling of a 

Polyurethane Foam Sample 

APPENDIX A 

Analytical Method 

SRC Publication No. 12650-1C09 
Confidential Report To V.O.C. Emissions Profiling of a 

Polyurethane Foam Sample 

ANALYTICAL METHOD 

Calibration Procedure: 

The initial calibration of the thermal desorption system is performed by using the TDU in the 

preparation mode, where a known concentration of the calibration gas vapour (normally 

toluene, but other compounds may be substituted by prior approval) is loaded into a clean 

tube. The tube is then desorbed in the operating mode into the GC/MSD system. This 

calibration check is performed regularly during the analysis of the sample tubes as a quality 

control check. The linearity of response of the calibration compound is checked by loading 

high levels of the compound onto the CarbotrapsT"' until non-linearity occurs. A low level 

loading is also done to check on the lower limit of detection . 

The sample tubes are desorbed in the TDU at 300°C for 3 minutes. The desorption chamber 

is directly linked to the capillary column in the GC and any volatilized compounds are 

recorded on the total ion chromatogram (TIC) . Full scan mass spectra (m/e range 40-500) 

are acquired for the entire run . 

Any peaks in the TIC that have a signal/noise ratio greater than ten are processed through 

the library search routine for compound identification . Library matches are inspected by the 

operator to check for quality of the matches. The software also calculates a quality factor 

from 0-100% . Any compound with >90% quality are considered excellent. For compounds 

whose mass spectra do not give an excellent match, a code is assigned which indicates the 

level of confidence of identification (the codes range from 1-5) . These codes were previously 

described in Section 8.5 . The best library matches occur when there are no interfering coeluting peaks and there is a high signal-to-noise ratio for the compound GC peak. For the 

same compound during the time of study, the quality factor may degrade when the signal 

gets very small . 

SRC Publication No. 12650-1C09 
APPENDIX B 

Witness Report 

SRC Publication No. 12650-1C09 
Spray Polyurethane Foam - VOC Testing - Witness Report 

i': ~ 

,,yi~ ;c .: d

;~.,'~'a;'F.: , e:` `.' 

Client : . -FP-hone.- 

Address: . _ Fax: 

Contact: 

Product Name: 

A-Side Batch # 

B-Side Batch # 

.-

~~~\ ::.:%~,.,t- " .',3 

E-mail : , 

- 

Storage Location: 

Storage Conditions : 4 0 

q l . "`F 

~ ka~+~ 

." +~'" `AM 

,y s 

Storage Duration: A 

Sam le Created: ~ date__ ~ ; ~ time 

Sam~k Prepared At: 

_ 

- 

Sa_m ie S ra ed B t)f: 

Sam le Witnessed B : ~; pf; 

Dimensions: width-mmLlf,~1~,~len h-mm . ~L. , eight-m ) 

No. of Passes: 

Descri ption of Spray urface: ( 0 ) ; 

Dimensions of Spray Surface: width-mm %)O~O en h-mm 

.A 

1 :1,4\Lt~1\'

""" \'! ~ . .' : ".n\Lt .k¢~ .`~~ {. . 

Unit Make: , us _ Unit Model: 

Spray Ratio: 

" 

Spray Pressure: 

Gun Make: Gun Model- s' Accessories: _x m* chcn.l,~r 

Tem erature-A-side: d 

, Temperature -B-side: oF - 

I Temperature -Hose: 121 -1: 

Notes: _ 0 ]if- ap lara :PA--)CO-dJtt¢ a lb ~ SVpfe- ns26xVy' 

~Op ^w(irA! n,pLl.a, y, -~caa) .41 mmAlr 

-.---- 

Signature of Wit 

..--

Ci"` °