alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EX-10.13





 Exhibit 10.13 

SUMMARY OF COMPENSATION AGREEMENT 

BETWEEN VICOR CORPORATION AND ANDREW D’AMICO 

The following is a description of the compensation agreement between Vicor Corporation (the “Company”) and Andrew D’Amico, provided pursuant to
Item 601(b)(10)(iii)(A) of Regulation S-K promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission, which requires a written description of a compensatory agreement when no formal document exists. 

Mr. D’Amico has served in the role of general counsel for the Company for intellectual property matters since January 2006. Pursuant to an informal
compensation agreement between the Company and Mr. D’Amico (the “Agreement”), in exchange for his services as general counsel, the Company has agreed to pay Mr. D’Amico a fee of $30,000 per month, as well as
reimbursement of expenses incurred in connection with his provision of services to the Company. Also pursuant to the Agreement, Mr. D’Amico is entitled to an incentive fee equal to 3% of the royalties received by the Company pursuant to
certain license agreements negotiated by Mr. D’Amico on behalf of the Company. The aggregate amount of such incentive fees is limited to $1,000,000, although this amount may be increased by mutual agreement in certain circumstances,
including the negotiation of additional license agreements by Mr. D’Amico. As of December 31, 2020, the amount of such incentive fees payable to Mr. D’Amico is immaterial. The Company expects to continue the Agreement, under
the same terms and conditions, for the remainder of 2021. 
 Mr. D’Amico also serves as a non-employee
director of the Company and, as such, he is eligible to participate in, and receive cash and equity compensation in accordance with, the Company’s standard non-employee director compensation programs.
Petition for Writ of Mandamus Dismi ss ed and Memorandum Opinion filed

March 8, 2018.

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

NO. 14- 17 -00935- CV

IN RE JACOBS FIELD SERVICES NORTH AMERICA, INC., JACOBS ENGINEERING GROUP INC., JACOBS ENGINEERING, INC., AND NORWEST HYDRAULIC & PNEUMATIC, INC., Relators

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING WRIT OF MANDAMUS 61st District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2015-27771



### MEMORANDUM OPINION
On December 1, 2017, relator s Jacobs Field Services North America, Inc., Jacobs Engineering Group Inc., Jacobs Engineering, Inc., and NorWest Hydraulic & Pneumatic, Inc. filed a petition for writ of m andamus in this court

. See Tex. Gov’t2

Code Ann. § 22.221 (West Supp. 2017 ); see also Tex. R. App. P. 52. In the petition,
relator s ask this Court to compel the Honorable Fredericka Phillips, presiding judge of the 61st District Court of Harris County , to set aside her December 1, 2017 orders (1) granting real parties in interest’s motion to exclude relators’ witnesses; and (2) denying relators’ motion for continuance

. Relators filed an unopposed motion to dismiss their petition because the parties have settled the case. The requested relief is now moot. Therefore, the
motion is GRANTED

. Accordingly, relators’ petition for writ of mandamus is ordered dismissed. Relators’ motion for temporary relief is denied as moot.

PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Christopher, Brown, and Wise.
Before the Second Division,

February 16, 1949

No. 52881.

#### W. T. Grant Co. *v.*United States,

protests 514230-G, etc. (New York).

*245Opinion by

Rao, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). The claim of the plaintiff was therefore sustained.
# C_2018022EN.01000701.xml

| 22.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 22/7 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

22.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 22/7

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 November 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice of England and Wales, Queen’s Bench Division (Administrative Court) — United Kingdom) — Toufik Lounes v Secretary of State for the Home Department

(Case C-165/16) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Citizenship of the Union - Article 21 TFEU - Directive 2004/38/EC - Beneficiaries - Dual nationality - Union citizen having acquired the nationality of the host Member State while retaining her nationality of origin - Right of residence in that Member State of a third-country national who is a family member of the Union citizen))

(2018/C 022/08)

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Referring court

High Court of Justice of England and Wales, Queen’s Bench Division (Administrative Court)

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Toufik Lounes

Applicant:

Defendant: Secretary of State for the Home Department

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Directive 2004/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the right of citizens of the Union and their family members to move and reside freely within the territory of the Member States amending Regulation (EEC) No 1612/68 and repealing Directives 64/221/EEC, 68/360/EEC, 72/194/EEC, 73/148/EEC, 75/34/EEC, 75/35/EEC, 90/364/EEC, 90/365/EEC and 93/96/EEC must be interpreted as meaning that, in a situation in which a citizen of the European Union (i) has exercised his freedom of movement by moving to and residing in a Member State other than that of which he is a national, under Article 7(1) or Article 16(1) of that directive, (ii) has then acquired the nationality of that Member State, while also retaining his nationality of origin, and (iii) several years later, has married a third-country national with whom he continues to reside in that Member State, that third-country national does not have a derived right of residence in the Member State in question on the basis of Directive 2004/38. The third-country national is however eligible for a derived right of residence under Article 21(1) TFEU, on conditions which must not be stricter than those provided for by Directive 2004/38 for the grant of such a right to a third-country national who is a family member of a Union citizen who has exercised his right of freedom of movement by settling in a Member State other than the Member State of which he is a national.

---

(1)  OJ C 191, 30.5.2016.

1

---
```

[Federal Register: June 3, 2010 (Volume 75, Number 106)]
[Notices]               
[Page 31450]
From the Federal Register Online via GPO Access [wais.access.gpo.gov]
[DOCID:fr03jn10-78]                         

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

 
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with section 10(d) of the Federal Advisory Committee 
Act (5 U.S.C., Appendix 2), announcement is made of a Health Care 
Policy and Research Special Emphasis Panel (SEP) meeting.
    A Special Emphasis Panel is a group of experts in fields related to 
health care research who are invited by the Agency for Healthcare 
Research and Quality (AHRQ), and agree to be available, to conduct on 
an as-needed basis, scientific reviews of applications for AHRQ 
support. Individual members of the Panel do not attend regularly-
scheduled meetings and do not serve for fixed terms or a long period of 
time. Rather, they are asked to participate in particular review 
meetings which require their type of expertise.
    Substantial segments of the upcoming SEP meeting listed below will 
be closed to the public in accordance with the Federal Advisory 
Committee Act, section 10(d) of 5 U.S.C., Appendix 2 and 5 U.S.C. 
552b(c)(6). Grant applications for the OS ARRA: Optimizing Prevention 
and Healthcare Management for Complex Patients (R21) applications are 
to be reviewed and discussed at this meeting. These discussions are 
likely to reveal personal information concerning individuals associated 
with the applications. This information is exempt from mandatory 
disclosure under the above-cited statutes.
    SEP Meeting on: OS ARRA: Optimizing Prevention and Healthcare 
Management for Complex Patients (R21).
    Date: June 24, 2010 (Open on June 24 from 8 a.m. to 8:15 a.m. and 
closed for the remainder of the meeting).
    Place: Hilton Rockville Executive Meeting Center, 1750 Rockville 
Pike, Conference Room TBD, Rockville, MD 20850.
    Contact Person: Anyone wishing to obtain a roster of members, 
agenda or minutes of the nonconfidential portions of this meeting 
should contact Mrs. Bonnie Campbell, Committee Management Officer, 
Office of Extramural Research, Education and Priority Populations, 
AHRQ, 540 Gaither Road, Room 2038, Rockville, Maryland 20850, Telephone 
(301) 427-1554.
    Agenda items for this meeting are subject to change as priorities 
dictate.

    Dated: May 24, 2010.
Carolyn M. Clancy,
Director.
[FR Doc. 2010-13108 Filed 6-2-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160-90-M
```
Exhibit
23.1





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM








To the
Board of Directors


Xfone,
Inc.





Gentlemen:





We hereby
consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements on Form
S-8 (No. 333-158495 and No. 333-76566) of Xfone, Inc. of our report dated March
30, 2010 relating to the consolidated financial statements of Xfone, Inc. as of
and for the year ended December 31, 2009, which appears in this Annual
Report on Form 10-K.





/s/
      Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLPBaker
      Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP


Minneapolis,
Minnesota


March 30,
2010
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 216 (Thursday, November 9, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 77372]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-24975]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NEIGHBORHOOD REINVESTMENT CORPORATION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 4:00 p.m., Wednesday, November 29, 2023.

PLACE: 1255 Union Street NW, Suite 500, Washington, DC 20002.

STATUS: Part of this meeting will be open to the public. The rest of 
this meeting will be closed to the public.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Audit Committee Board of Directors meeting.
    The Interim General Counsel of the Corporation has certified that 
in her opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in the 
Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(2) permit the closure 
of the following portion(s) of this meeting:
    <bullet> Executive (Closed) Session

Agenda

I. Call to Order
II. Sunshine Act Approval to Meet in Executive (Closed) Session
III. Executive Session: GAO Workplan Update
IV. Executive Session: Chief Audit Executive Report
V. Action Item: Deferred Internal Audit Projects from FY2023 Internal 
Audit Plan
VI. Action Item: FY2024 Internal Audit Plan and Risk Assessment
VII. Action Item: Removal and Replacement of Conformance Language
VIII. Discussion Item: Network Watchlist Report
IX. Discussion Item: Internal Audit Status Reports
    a. Internal Audit Performance Scorecard
    b. Implementation of Internal Audit Recommendations
    c. Officer's Report
    d. Quality Assurance Improvement Policy
    Portions Open to the Public: Everything except the Executive 
(Closed) Session.
    Portions Closed to the Public: Executive (Closed) Session.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Jenna Sylvester, Paralegal, (202) 
568-2560; <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#d1bba2a8bda7b4a2a5b4a391bfa6ffbea3b6"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="9df7eee4f1ebf8eee9f8efddf3eab3f2effa">[email protected]</span></a>.

Jenna Sylvester,
Paralegal.
[FR Doc. 2023-24975 Filed 11-7-23; 4:15 pm]
BILLING CODE P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
EXHIBIT 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report of Duke Capital LLC (Duke Capital) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David L. Hauser, President of Duke Capital, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Duke Capital.



|                   |  |  |  |                          
|------------------ |  |  |  | -------------------------
|                   |  | 
|Date: May 17, 2004 |  |  |  | /s/    DAVID L. HAUSER   
|                   |  |  |  |                          
|                   |  |  |  | David L. Hauser President
No. 52832.

#### National Carbon Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 136635-K, etc. (Buffalo, etc.).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

_______________________________________________________________________ 

 : 

BMG MUSIC, et. al. : Civil Action No. 

 Plaintiffs, : 04-0650 

v. : 

JOHN DOE, : 

 Defendant. : 

_______________________________________________________________________ 

NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 

Kindly enter the appearance of Mary Catherine Roper as additional 

counsel for amici curiae ACLU of Pennsylvania, American Civil Liberties Union, 

Electronic Frontier Foundation and Public Citizen in this action: 

Mary Catherine Roper 

American Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania 

P.O. Box 1161 

Philadelphia, PA 19105 

v: 215.592.1513 ext. 116 

f: 215.592.1343 

mroper@aclupa.org

Respectfully, 

Dated: March 22, 2005. /s/ Mary Catherine Roper 

Mary Catherine Roper 

Attorney ID No. 71107 

American Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania 

P.O. Box 1161 

Philadelphia, PA 19105 

v: 215.592.1513 ext. 116 

f: 215.592.1343 

mroper@aclupa.org

Case 2:04-cv-00650-CN Document 19 Filed 03/22/05 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that I am this day serving the foregoing document upon the persons and 

in the manner indicated below: 

By electronic means:

Vincent Carissimi 

Pepper Hamilton 

3000 Two Logan Square 

18th and Arch Streets 

Philadelphia, PA 19103 

Dated: March 22, 2005. /s/ Mary Catherine Roper 

Case 2:04-cv-00650-CN Document 19 Filed 03/22/05 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT
TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO

SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In
connection with the Annual Report of Watair. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending March 31, 2013, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, David Hill, Chief Executive
Officer of Vyre Network (formerly, Watair, Inc.), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                              
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                    
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                 | On behalf of: WATAIR, INC.           
|---------------- | -------------------------------------
|January 26, 2024 | /s/ David Hill                       
|                 | Chief Executive Officer, Vyre Network
|                 | (Principal executive).               
|                 |
Before the Second Division,

January 17, 1950

No. 53918.

#### Bloomingdale Bros., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 131149-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protests were dismissed.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                  Exhibit 10.iii

                        AMENDMENT TO CONSULTING AGREEMENT


         This Amendment to Consulting Agreement is dated as of January 22, 1999
(the "Amendment"), by and between New Directions Manufacturing, Inc., a Nevada
corporation (the "Company") and Sean F. Lee ("Consultant") (collectively, the
"Parties"). All undefined capitalized terms shall have the meanings set forth
for them in the Employment Agreement between the Parties hereto effective as of
December 31, 1996 (the "Agreement").

         1. The Agreement is hereby amended as follows:

         The Agreement has a term of three years from December 31, 1996, meaning
it will expire on December 31, 1999. The Board of Directors of the Company have
approved this Amendment to the Agreement extending the term of the Agreement for
an additional three years, meaning the Agreement will now expire on December 31,
2002.

         2. This Amendment may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of
which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which shall be one and the
same document.

         3. This Amendment shall be governed and construed in accordance with
the laws of the State of Nevada.

         4. Except as otherwise set forth herein, the Agreement shall remain in
full force and effect.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have duly executed this
Amendment to Consulting Agreement as of the date first above written.

                                             THE COMPANY

                                             NEW DIRECTIONS MANUFACTURING, INC.
                                             a Nevada corporation


                                             /s/ Donald A. Metke
                                             BY:  Donald A. Metke
                                             ITS: President

                                             CONSULTANT


                                             /s/ Sean F. Lee
                                             Sean F. Lee
TT4L

ational bank 19) \O P.O. BOX 100

st_n:
ARCOLA, ILLINOIS 61910
ESTABLISHED 1874 ‘TELEPHONE: 217-268-4911
\ FAX: 217-268-8134

August 23, 1999

Cynthia L. Johnson, Director

Cash Management Policy & Planning
Financial Management Service, Room 420
401 14” Street S.W.

Washington D.C. 20227

RE: Purposed Amendment to TT&L Rate of Interest

At the present time, banks are heavily burdened and absorb the expenses of TT&L collection.
If the TT&L account belonged to a private customer, it would earn considerably less, if any,
interest based on the activity in the account. The idea of raising this interest instead of
lowering it is simply “ Gouging “.

Our non-bank competition continues to out pace bank profitability and return on investment
‘because they are not burdened with this type of cost absorption which banks are faced with in
the TT&L account. We would suggest that a study be under taken showing the true cost of
this account and the services performed and a fair rate of interest setup for the account. We
all believe in fairness but it is very unfair of the US Treasury to impose additional burdens on
the bank and its customers at the same time demanding higher rates of interest. The amount
of money involved is in the bank such a short time that it has no useful purpose to the bank.
We can not lend this money out. It is strictly a service to the customer and to the US
Treasury. We hope you will review this proposal and be more realistic in your actions.

SAW doen

eph

the Board

JMM/ch
-80 -79 -78 -77 -76 -75 -74

38 39 40 41



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



### ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 500 1000 1500 1000 18 12 06 00 08/23 

### NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

## Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 23 Aug 06

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.90 N 76.65 WMeters AGL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Eastern District of Pennsylvania

U.S. Court House

Independence Mall West

601 Market Street

Philadelphia, PA 19106-1797

215/597-1178

April 13, 2012

NOTICE OF CONFERENCE:

RE: BEHREND, ET AL v. COMCAST CORPORATION

 C.A. No. 03-6604

Dear Counsel:

Please be advised that a SCHEDULING CONFERENCE will be held

on April 23, 2012 at 2:30 p.m. in Courtroom 17B.

Very truly yours,

/s/Gerrie Keane

Gerrie Keane

Deputy Clerk to Judge Padova

To: ALL COUNSEL OF RECORD

Case 2:03-cv-06604-JP Document 477 Filed 04/13/12 Page 1 of 1
No. 67767.

#### Castelazo & Associates, a/c David Chow & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 59/17813, etc. (Los Angeles).

*315Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that tbe items marked “I”’ consist of rattancore flower cages tbe same in all material respects as those tbe subject of *Quon Quon Company*v. *United States*(41 Cust. Ct. 181, C.D. 2039) and tbe items marked “R” consist of trays in part of rattan similar in all material respects to those tbe subject of Abstract 66729, tbe claim at 45 percent ad valorem under paragraph 409 as articles, wholly or partly manufactured of rattan, or at 25 percent under said paragraph, as modified by tbe Japanese Protocol to tbe General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 53865), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T.D. 53877), was sustained. Tbe items marked “W,” stipulated to consist of trays, etc., not in part of rattan, similar in all material respects to those tbe subject of said Abstract 66729, were held dutiable at 16% percent under the provision in paragraph 412, as modified by tbe Annecy Protocol to tbe General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 52373), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T.D. 52476), for manufactures of wood, not specially provided for, as claimed.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

November 2 , 2017

N o. 04

- 17

- 00648

- CV

Rudolph RESENDEZ

, Appellant

v.

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

, Appellee

From the 218th Judicial District Court, Karnes County, Texas

Trial Court No. 15

- 10

- 00236

- CVK

Honorable H. Paul Canales, Judge Presiding



### ORDER

Extension of time to file the Clerk’s Record is this date NOTED. Time is extended to

November 15, 2017.



### PER CURIAM

ATTESTED TO:

____________________________ KEITH E. HOTTLE

C lerk of Court

D enise Rodriguez

District Clerk

- Karnes County

210 West Calvert, Suite 180

Karnes City, TX 78118
# C_2017424EN.01000802.xml

| 11.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 424/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 424/8

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 19 October 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d’État — France) — Solar Electric Martinique v Ministre des Finances et des Comptes publics

(Case C-303/16) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Sixth VAT Directive - Directive 2006/112/EC - Works of construction - French overseas departments - Provisions rendered applicable by national law - Transactions consisting in sale and installation on buildings - Classification as a single transaction - Lack of jurisdiction))

(2017/C 424/11)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Conseil d’État

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Solar Electric Martinique

Applicant:

Defendant: Ministre des Finances et des Comptes publics

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court of Justice of the European Union does not have jurisdiction to answer the question referred by the Conseil d’État (Council of State, France) by decision of 20 May 2016.

---

(1)  OJ C 287, 8.8.2016.

1

---