UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION

WASHINGTON, DC

Regulatory Docket No.

_______________

PETITION FOR AMENDMENT TO GRANT OF EXEMPTION NO. 13806

BY DFS AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS, LLC

Submitted on March 2 , 2016

G REGORY S. W INTON

, E SQ

. T HE A VIATION L AW F IRM

1997 Annapolis Exchange Parkway

Suite 300

Annapolis, Maryland 21401

Tel: (301) 294

- 8550

Fax: (866) 568

- 9886

Attorney for Petitioner2 Su mmary

Petitioner, DFS Autonomous Systems, LLC (“DFS”), by and through undersigned counsel,

pursuant to the provisions of the Federal Aviation Regulations and the Federal Aviation

Administration (“FAA”) Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, Section 333, Special Rules for

Certai n Unmanned Aircraft Systems, hereby petitions the Administrator for an amendment to

Grant Of Exemption No. 13806 (Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 7210) (“Exemption No.

13806”) , which granted to DFS an exemption from 14 C

. F

. R

. §§ 61.23(a) and (c), 61.101(e)(4)

and (5), 61.113(a), 61.315(a), 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1), 91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1),

91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b) to the extent necessary to allow the petitioner to

operate a DJI Inspire 1 and DJI Phantom 2 UAS to perform aerial data collection

. 1

Specifically, DFS seeks an amendment to Exemption No. 13806 for additional exemption

from the requirements of 14 C.F.R. §91.109 (a)

, and to the extent necessary to a llow DFS to

operate any and all UAS previously approved by the Secretary of the Department of

Transportation for operation under Section 333, as shown in Attachment 1 , in aerial data

collection operations and UAS training operations for compensation or hire

. The FAA

previously approved for Measure, a 32 Advisors Company, LLC (“Measure”) to conduct aerial

data coll ection operations utilizing UAS previously approved by the Secretary under Section

333 in Grant of Exemption No. 12646 (Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 1602) (“Exemption

No. 126 46”)

. 2 The FAA has also previously approved under Section 333 for a commercial

1 Aerial data collection includes any remote sensing and measuring by an instrument(s) aboard a UA. Examples

include imagery (photography, video, infrared, etc.), electronic measurement (precision surveying, RF analysis,

etc.), chemical measurement (partic ulate measurement, etc.), or any other gathering of data by instruments aboard a

UA.

2 Measure’s Grant of Exemption Condition and Limitation Number 1 stated the following:

Operations authorized by this grant of exemption are limited to the aircraft approved by the Secretary of the

Department of Transportation for operation under Section 333 (Attachment 1) when weighing less than 553

operator to conduct UAS training operations for compensation or hire

, in its Grant of Exemption

No. 13465 (Regulatory Docket No. FAA

- 2014

- 1088) (“Exemption No. 13465”) to Kansas State

University

. DFS submits that allowing it to conduct UAS training operations in accordance with

the proposed conditions and limitations below will positively affect unmanned aviation activities

by providing future UAS operators with a safe env ironment to gain proficiency and experience.

Additionally

, allowing operation of UAS previously approved by the Secretary of the

Department of Transportation f or operation under Section 333, under the conditions and

limitations below

, wi ll maintain the sa fety of the National Airspace System (“NAS”), as well as

the safety of persons or property on the ground.

In support thereof, DFS states as follows:

U nmanned Aircraft System s

DFS Autonomous Systems, LLC seeks amendment of Exemption No. 13806 in order to

operate the UAS previously approved by the Secretary of the Department of Transportation

under Section 333 (See Attachment 1) for compensation or hire within the NAS pursuant to

Paragraph 1 of the Conditions and Limitations section of Exemption No. 13806. All of the

aircraft shown in Attachment 1 have previously been approved by the FAA for use in UAS

operations for compensation or hire under Section 333 and, a s discussed herein, the relief

requested by DFS Autonomous Systems, LLC is in all material respects similar to that of

Measure and Kansas State University ; it is similar in all material respects to the relief previously

requested in Grant of Exemption Nos. 11062, 11109, 11112, and 11213; and the reasons stated

by the FAA for gra nting Exemption Nos. 11062, 11109, 11112, and 11213 also apply to the

pounds including payload. Proposed oper ations of any other aircraft will require a new petition or a

petition to amend this exemption.

“Attachment 1” included 324 different UAS models previously approved by the FAA for operation under Section

333 at the time of submission.4

present situation. Additionally, granting this Petition for Amendment would be in the public

interest.

A. Name And Address Of The Petitioner.

The name and address of the Petitioner is :

DFS Autonomous Systems, LLC

25 Shaw Street

Annapolis, MD 21401

The point of contact for this Petition and specific contact information is as follows:

Gregory S. Winton, Esq.

The Aviation Law Firm

1997 Annapolis Exchange Parkway, Suite 300

Annapolis, Maryland 21401

Tel: (301) 294

- 8550 | Fax: (866) 568

- 9886

Email: Greg@aviationlawexperts.com

B. Extent Of Amendment That DFS Seeks And The Reason DFS Seeks To

Amend Condition And Limitation No. 1 of Exemption No. 13806

.

Condition and Limitation No. 1 of Exemption No. 13806 states the following:

Operations authorized by this grant of exemption are limite d to the DJI Inspire 1

and DJI Phantom 2 when weighing less than 55 pounds including p ayload.

Proposed operations of any other aircraft will require a new petition or a petition

to amend this exemption.

See Exemption No. 13806 at page 3, ¶1.

DFS submits that Condition and Limitation No. 1 of Exemption No. 13806 be

amended to read as follows:

Operations authorized by this grant of exempt ion are limited to the UAS

previously approved by the Secretary of the Department of Transportation

( See Attachment 1) when weighing less than 55 pou n ds including payload.

Proposed operations of any other aircraft will require a new petition or a

petition to amend this exemption

.

This relief is requested because DFS’ original Petition For Exemption (Regulatory

Docket No. FAA

- 2015

- 7210 ) did not request a grant to operate the UAS previously approved5

by the Secretary of the Department of Transportation , as s hown in Attachment 1 . However,

DFS proposes that it may safely operate the UAS previously approved by the Secretary of the

Department of Transportation for operation under Section 333 pursuant to the Conditions and

Limitations set forth in Exemption No. 13806

.

C

. DFS Seeks To Add The Following Condition And Limitation To Those Originally

Listed In Grant of Exemption No. 13806.

DFS seeks to amend the 32 Conditions and Limitations listed in Exemption No. 13806 in

order to add the following :

The operator m ay conduct training operations when the trainer/instructor is qualified as a

PIC under this exemption and designated as Pilot

- in

- Command ( PIC ) for the entire

duration of the flight operation. Students/trainees are considered essential for the

operation an d are not required to hold any certificate or meet any of the operating

requirements (including maintaining visual line of site ( VLOS ) of the aircraft) in this

exemption. The student/trainees may be the manipulators of the controls; however, the

PIC must have sufficient override capability to safely abort the operation if necessary

including taking any action necessary to ensure safety of other aircraft as well as persons

and property on the ground in the event of unsafe maneuvers and/or emergencies

, for

e xample landing in an empty area away from people and property.

Under all training situations, the PIC is responsible for the safety of operation. The PIC

is also responsible for meeting all applicable conditions and limitations as prescribed in

this exemption and any air traffic organization ( ATO )

- issued certificate of authorization

or waiver ( COA ) , and operating in accordance with the operating documents. All

training operations must be cond ucted during dedicated training session and may or may

not be for compensation or hire. The operation must be conducted with a visual observer

( VO ) who is not a student and not the PIC. The VO must maintain visual sight of the

aircraft at all times during flight operations without distraction in accordance with the

conditions and limitations below. Furthermore, the PIC must ope rate the UAS not closer

than 500 feet to any nonparticipating person without exception.

This relief is requested because although the original Petition for Exemption sought relief

to conduct training operations, the FAA’s Grant of Exemption No. 13806 did not authorize DFS

to conduct UAS training operations for compensation or hire

. DFS proposes that it can safely

conduct UAS training operations under the proposed conditions and limitations, and that its UAS6

training operations for compensation or hire would be in all material resp ects similar to those

granted by the FAA under Exemption No. 13465 (i.e. Kansas State University).

D. The Reasons Why Granting DFS’ Request For Amendment Would Be In The

Public Interest; That Is, How It Would Benefit The Pub lic As A Whole.

Granting the present P etition for A mendment will further the public interest as set forth

by the Administrator in Exemption No. 13806. Specifically, the Administrator found that the

enhanced safety achieved be using an unmanned aircraft ( UA) with the specifications described

by the petitioner and carrying no passengers or crew, rather than a manned aircraft of

significantly greater proportions, carrying crew in addition to flammable fuel, gives the FAA

good cause to find that the UAS opera tion enabled by this exemption is in the public interest

.

There has been no change in the conditions and reasons relative to the public interest and safety

that were the basis for granting the original Exemption No. 13806

.

Additionally, granting the pres ent P etition for Amendment would further the public

interest for the reasons originally set forth in the FAA’s Grant of Exemption No. 13465 to

Kansas State University , i.e., that “ a llowing p rofessional training programs for UAS operators

will positively affect unmanned aviation activities by providing future UAS operators with a safe

environment to gain proficiency and experience. ” By allowing DFS to implement and further

develop its UAS training program, the FAA would expand the availability of professi onal UAS

training and aid in ensuring that UAS operators can obtain the knowledge and experience needed

in order to begin conducting commercial UAS operations in a safe and efficient manner

.

Granting DFS’ Petition for A mendment would not only further the public’s interest as

described above

, but it would be another step toward fulfilling the Congressional mandate of the

FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, by allowing DFS to safely, efficiently, and

economically operate the UAS previously approved by the Secretary of the Department of7

Transportation for operation under Section 333 commercially within the NAS , and also by

allowing DFS to train others within the burgeoning UAS industry

.

E. The Reasons Why Granting The Proposed Amendment s Would Not Adve rsely

Affect Safety.

DFS proposes that it may safely operate the UAS previously approved by the Secretary

of the Department of Transportation for operation under Section 333 within the NAS because the

proposed aircraft have already been determined to be safe for operation by the FAA and they will

be operated pursuant to Conditions and Limitations as prescribed by the FAA in previous Grants

of Exemption . Further, DFS’ proposed operations are in all material respects similar to

operations already determined to be safe by the FAA.

DFS proposes that it may safely conduct UAS training operations because the operations

will be consistent with the FAA’s requirements for student pilots of manned ai rcraft. When a

trainee , or other non

- qualified person, is manipulating the controls of a UAS, the PIC will retain

responsibil ity for conducting safe operations, for meeting all applicable conditions and

limitations as prescribed under the amended Exemptio n No. 13806 and ATO

- issued COA, and

for operating in accordance with the UAS’ operating documents

. UAS training operations will

always be conducted under the supervision of a PIC and will include a dedicated VO that is not

the individual being trained. U AS training operations will onl y be conducted during dedicated

training sessions and DFS will not conduct any operations for a purpose other than training

during such sessions.

The PIC will also have sufficient override capability to safely abort the op eration if

necessary , such as through: (1) a “buddy box” system using two transmitters, with one being

operated by the PIC and the other operated by the individual being trained/instructed; or (2) a

ground control system (GCS) operated by the individual be ing trained/instructed and the PIC8

having a secondary transmitter with full override capability

. F urther, the capability to safely

abort a UAS training operation will not be adversely affected even if the UAS does not have a

dual set of controls. Any UAS training operations will be conducted on private or controlled

access property with permission from the person with legal authority to grant access to the

property and all UAS training operations will be conducted at least 500 feet from any

nonparticipati ng person.

DFS maintains that by taking such precautionary measures, as previously prescribed by

the FAA in Exemption No. 13465, safety will not be adversely affected during UAS training

operations for compensation or hire

.

F. A Summary That Can Be Published In The Federal Register

.

DFS submits that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of this Petition for

A mendment in the Federal Register because the requested amendment to Exemption No. 13806

would not set a precedent, and any delay in ac ting on this petition would be detrimental to the

petitioner. The DJI Inspire 1 and DJI Phantom 2 UAS authorized in the original grant of

exemption are comparable in type, size, weight, speed and operating capabilities to the other

UAS previously approved by the Secretary of the Department of Transportation for operation

under Section 333

. Additionally, t he UAS training operations proposed by DFS are in all

material resp ects similar to those approved by the FAA in Grant of Exemption No. 13465.

G. Any Additional Information, Views, Or Arguments Available To Support DFS’

Request.

This Petition is made pursuant to the FAA Modernization and Reform Act of 2012

Section 333, which directs the Secretary of Transportation to determine if certain UAS may

operate safely in the NAS. As such, DFS’ Petition for A mendment may be granted pursua nt to

the authority of FMRA Section 333 and 14 C.F.R. Part 11, as set forth above.9 CONCLUSION

WHEREFORE , in accordance with the Federal Aviation Regulations and the FAA

Modernization and Reform Act of 2012, Section 333, DFS Autonomous S ystem s, LLC

respect fully requests that the Administra tor grant this Petition for an A mendment to Exemption

No. 13806 seeking relief from 14 C.F.R. § 91.109(a)

, and to operate the UAS previously

approved by the Secretary of the Department of Transportation under Section 333 ( See

Attachment 1) for comp ensation or hire within the NAS , including to the extent necessary to

allow DFS to conduct UAS training operat ions under the proposed Conditions and

Limitations.

Dated: March 2 , 2016

Respectfully submitted,

The Aviation Law Firm

/s/ Gregory S. Winton

Gregory S. Winton, Esq.

1997 Annapolis Exchange Parkway

Suite 300

Annapolis, Maryland 21401

Tel: (301) 294

- 8550

Fax: (866) 568

- 9886

Attorney for Petitioner10



# ATTACHMENT 111

1. 2AgEagle

2. 3D Robotics Aero

- M

3. 3D Robotics Iris

4. 3D Robotics Iris+

5. 3D Robotics X8

6. 3D Robotics DIY Quad Kit

7. 3DRobotics Fixed Wing

8. 3DRobotics Multirotor

9. 3DRobotics Quadrotor

10. 3DR Solo

11. 3DR Spektre

12. 3DRobotics Spektre Industrial Multi

- Rotor Aerial Vehicle

13. 3D Robotics Solo

14. 3DRobotics X8+

15. 3D Robotics X8

- M

16. 3D Robotics Y6

17. ACS XX8L

18. Aerial Mob Heavy Lifter

19. Aerial Mob Light Lifter

20. Aerial Remote Mineral Detection System (ARMDS)12

21. Aerialtronics Zenith with integrated Airware system

22. Aerialtronics Altura Zenith ATX8

23. Aerigon

24. Aerobo

25. AeroCine Kopterworx Hammer X12

26. AeroLogix GeoStar

27. Aeromao AeroMapper 300

28. Aeromao Talon

29. Aeromao Aeromapper EV

- 2

30. Aeronavics SkyJib 8 v.2 Heavy Lifter

31. Aeronavics X4 Titanium

32. AeroVironment Shrike

33. AeroVironment Puma

34. Aervonics Sky Jib frame with a DJI A2 flight system

35. Aeryon Sky Ranger

36. Aeryon Scout

37. AgEagle

38. AgEagle Robotic

39. AgGasser

40. AgScout13

41. AgScout Mini

42. Agribotix Hornet Drone

43. Agribotix Enduro Quad

44. AgriView VK Ranger EX

45. Aibot

46. Aibotix X

- 6

47. Air Rover AR

- 3000

48. AirCover QR

- 425s

49. AirRobot AR 100

50. AirRobot AR 180

51. AirRobot AR200

52. Air

- X

53. Align M690

54. Allied Drones Chaos X

- 8

55. Allied Drones HornetCam

56. Allied Drones HV44

57. Altavian Nova F6500

58. Altavian Nova R8400

59. Altus X

- 4

60. Altus X

- 814

61. American Drones, LLC Eagle

62. Apprentice

63. Arch Aerial OCTO multi

- rotor UAS

64. Arris hexacoper

65. AR

- 960 Hex Rotor

66. AR

- 540 Quad Rotor

67. ARF

- MikroKopter OktoXL

68. ARF

- MikroKopter OktoXL +

69. ArrowLite

70. AscTec Falcon

71. AscTec Falcon 8

72. Astraeus Aerial Cinema System V.3CS

73. ATI AgBot

74. ATI AgGasser

75. ATI Thor X4

76. Atlantic RC Aircraft LC04

77. Auburn Trimble UX5

78. Auburn War Eagle

79. Auburn EasyStar

80. Auburn15

81. AV44

82. AV

- 900

83. Birdseyeview Aerobotics Firefly 6

84. Bixler 3DR Plane

85. Blade 350QX

86. Blade 350 QX3

87. Bixler 2

88. Boomerang Carbon Fiber Frame (The Identified System)

89. Bormatec Maja UAV

90. BOSH Technologies Super Swiper

91. Bumblebee

- S

92. C

- Astral Bramor gEO

93. CarbonCore Octocopter 1000

94. Carbon Core Cortex Quadcopter

95. CCO w/Wkm M

96. Chameleon Pro

97. CinesStar

98. Cinestar 6

99. Cinestar X8

100. Cinestar 816

101. Cinestar 8 HL

102. Cinestar 8 Okto XL

103. Coaxial Quad Multirotor VAO1

- V1

104. Coaxial Quad Multirotor VAO2

- V2

105. CopelandRED LLC Delta Wing Aircraft

106. CyberQuad Maxi

107. DAx8

108. DJI Flame Wheel F450

109. DJI Flame Wheel F550

110. DJI Inspire

111. DJI Inspire 1

112. DJI Inspire 2

113. DJI M P330z

114. DJI Matrix

115. DJI Matrice 100

116. DJI Phantom

117. DJI Phantom 1

118. DJI Phantom 2

119. DJI Phantom 2+

120. DJI Phantom 2 Vision17

121. DJI Phantom 2 Vision+

122. DJI Phantom Vision +

123. DJI Phantom 3

124. DJI Phantom FC40

125. DJI Spreading Wings S900

126. DJI Spreading Wings S1000

127. DJI Spreading Wings S1000+

128. DJI S800

129. DJI S800 EVO

130. DJI T600

131. Draganflyer Guardian

132. Draganflyer X4ES

133. Draganflyer X4P

134. Draganflyer X6

135. Drone

- Fleet Carbon Fiber V5

136. DT

- 18

137. DYS D800

- X8

138. Eagle VTOL

139. Eagle V2

140. E

- Flite Apprentice18

141. Event 38 E384

142. F

- 450

143. Falcon VTOL

144. Fire Fly 6

145. First Aerial Responder UAV

146. Flame Wheel G4 7.8 Skycrane

147. Flying

- Cam 3.0 SARAH

148. Foxtech Kraken 130 V2

149. FreeFly Systems ALTA RTF

150. FreeFly Systems Octocopter Airframe (Legacy)

151. G4 models

152. GeoStar

153. GerMAP G180

154. GerMAP G220

155. goFarm GF

- 1

156. Gryphon Dynamics X8

157. GT80X

158. Harris 18 HL

159. HEFF

160. Helicopters West DJI Inspire19

161. Helicopters West SkyJib 8

162. Helios 960

163. Hawkeye Mk

- III

164. HexaCrafter HC

- 1100

165. HexaCrafter HO

- 1250

166. HH Blade 350QX2 AP

167. Hobbyking “Bixler” Fixed Wing Trainer

168. HoneyComb AgDrone

169. Horizon Hobby Blade 350 Qx2 quadcopter

170. Hoverfly LiveSky, BigSky 60 and H

- Frame

171. Hubsan X4 micro drone

172. HVP 14301 MultiRotor

173. Identified System

174. IMT Global xFold Cinema

175. Indago

176. Industrial Aerobotics SD02

177. InovalDrone:Inova One

178. InstantEye Mk

- 2

179. InstantEye Mk

- 2 Gen2

180. Intuitive Aerial Aeragon20

181. K130 Octocopter

182. KongCopter X8

183. Kopterworx Hammer X12

184. Latitude HQ

- 4 Hybrid Multirotor

185. LB700

186. Leading Edge Precision Vision 10

187. Leptron Avenger

188. Lewis Realty Associates Hexacopter 650

189. Liberty 1

190. Lockheed Martin Desert Hawk III

191. Lockheed Martin Indago

192. MaxFlight

193. Microdrones MD4

- 200

194. Microdrones MD4

- 1000

195. Microdrones MD4

- 3000

196. Mikrokopter 2.5

197. MLB Company Super Bat

198. Monarch Ag

199. MU

- 1H

200. Multirotor G4 7.8 Skycrane21

201. Multirotor G4 Eagle

202. Nighthawk

203. Nighthawk VTOL

204. OktoXL 6S12

205. PAG X4

206. Parksone Radian RTF

207. Parrot Bebop drone

208. Parrot PF 725100 Bebop Drone 14MP

209. Parrot Skycontroller

210. Patriot X4

211. Patriot X8

212. Finwing Penguin V2

213. Phoenix

214. Phoenix VTOL

215. Phoenix 60

216. Phoenix 60LE

217. Pixhawk

218. Precision Drone Pacesetter

219. PrecisionHawk

220. PrecisionHawk Hawkeye Mk

- III22

221. PrecisionHawk Lancaster

222. Precision Lancaster MK3

223. PreNav 1.0

224. Prioria Hex

225. Prioria’s Maveric

226. Pulse Aerospace, PA 01 Vapor

227. Pulse Aerospace Pulse Vapor 35

228. Pulse Vapor

229. Puma AE DDL

230. PV 14817 Multi Rotor

231. PV HL1

232. PV HL2

233. Q1

234. Quadcopter LLC MikroKopter

235. Quiet UAV

236. Qube

237. Range Video RVJet

238. R/C Rotors and Aerial Media: Matrix Prof. Multi Rotor Frame & Octo Heavy Lift

Prof. Multi Rotor

239. RCTimer Hexacopter

240. RDASS23

241. REHawk 500

242. REHawk 680

243. RF

- 70

244. RIEGL RiCopter

245. RITEWING Z3 Spade 47”

246. Ritewing Drake 60”

247. RITEWING Z3 Spade 70”

248. RITEWING Z4 Spade 52”

249. RMAX

250. Roboflight RF

- 70

251. Ronin Octo

- Ashley

252. Ronin Octo

- Mary Kate

253. Rotomotion SR

- 15

254. Scout X4

255. SD02

256. Seahawk 1.2

257. SelectTech Geospacial’s EH

- 4

258. SenseFly eBee

259. SenseFly eBee RTK

260. SenseFly eXom24

261. Sensurion Magpie MP

- 1

262. Service

- Drone Recon One

263. Service

- Drone Blackbird

264. SH 900

265. ShadowHawk

266. Shrike

267. Sirius Basic

268. Sirius Pro

269. Skycatch

270. SkyPhilly MI

271. Skywalker Aero

272. Skywalker Flying Wing X8

273. SkyWard 1

274. SnapRoll Media SUAS

275. Solutions Phoenix 30

276. Stark Aerospace ArrowLite

277. SteadiDrone

278. Steadidrone Quad

279. Steadydrone QU4D

280. Steadidrone Mavik25

281. SuperX/P2 Multirotor

282. Swift Radioplanes Lynx

283. Tali 500

284. Talon 120LE

285. Tarot FY690S Hexacopter

286. Tarot quadcopter

287. Tarot 680pro

288. Tarot 690

289. Tarot 900

290. Tarot 960

291. Tarot T

- 15

292. Tarot T15 C/F Folding Octocopter

293. Tarot T18 UAV

294. Tarot T690

295. Tarot T810

296. Tarot T960

297. Tarsier Systems MoAC

298. Tayzu Robotics Titan X8

299. TBS Discovery Pro

300. Team Black Sheep Discovery Pro Tarot T1526

301. Thrust UAV Freeflight X4

302. T

- Rex 700E F3C

303. TREX 800E DFC PRO

304. Trimble UX5

305. Trimble UX5 hp

306. Trimble ZX5

307. Turningy Talon 500

308. TUP X8

- 800

309. Turbo Ace CINEWING 6

310. TurboAce Matrix

- G quadcopter

311. Turbo Ace matrix

- E

312. Turbo Ace MATRIX

- 1

313. UAV Factory Penguin B

314. UAV Solutions Phoenix 60

315. Universeye Penguin

316. Universeye Penguin V2

317. Unmanned Flying Rolling Orb “UFRO”

318. US2 GreenHawk

319. UtiliCopter ITX8

320. VA03

- v127

321. VA04

- v1

322. VA07

- v1

323. Vanguard Defense Industries ShadowHawk

324. Viking UAS Multicopter (VTOL)

325. Viking UAS FF

- X4/X8

326. VK

- Patriot X4/X8

327. Viking UAS Patriot X4/X8 Multirotor

328. Viking UAS X6 Model 800

329. Viking UAS Viking ONE

330. VK

- 450

331. Viking Unmanned Aerial Systems, LLC AgriView VK Ranger EX

332. Viking VK

- FF

- X4

333. VK

- Ranger EX

- SAR Fixed Wing UAS

334. Volantex Raptor Tarot T

- 18

335. Volt A erial Robotics Octane

336. Vulcan X8 controlled by a DJI A2 flight controller

337. Vulcan Mantis

338. Vulcan Octocopter

339. Vulcan Raven

340. Vulcan UAV28

341. Walkera TALI H500

342. Walkera Scout X4

343. Wookong DJI 5800

344. xCel Drones XD550CDR

345. XFold Rig with four configurations: Quadcopter, Hexcopter, Octocopter and x12

Copter

346. X8

- M

347. Yuneec Electric Aviation Model Q500 Typhoon