alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
### GilaRiver Indian Communiiy Department ofEnvironmental Quality Air Program P.O.Box 97 

### . Sacaton, Az. 85247 Phone: (520) 562-2234 Fax: (520) 562-2245 

## FAX TRANSMISSION

From: 

# -9 

# TYW'I'IS Date: 

# 5 

# -a34s Re: Pages (including 

### this page): cc:

# GILA 

# RIV-ERINDIAN 

# COMMUNITY SCATON, AZ 

## 85247 DISTRICT 3 SERVICE CENTER POST OFFICE BOX 546 OFFICE:(520) 562-3334 FAX: (520) 562-3435 

# Agenda Request Form Date: (Please provide the hate you are requesting to be placed on the agenda. Community meetings are held every first and third Tuesday of the month.) 

### Topic: 

# A r Who 

### will represent the topic: 

### D~cwcie4 

# ~~& Title: 

## Pc\\r &hd 

## 5@cicLQiss

# ;9 What items listed below does this request need to be plackd by? Please check one: 

### O Old Business Reports New Business OFinancial Request OMiscellaneous 

### Contact persontphone number: 

## '5Xl-5b2 

## -&23q 

## n&c4kd l?k& p- 

# - JW-fCTvav15 **PLEASE PROVIDE A SHORT SUMMARY OF PRESENTATION TO BE INCLUDED 

### M POSTING OF THE AGENDAi*

# -5C;e 

### &% gl?ee+ 

### Return 

### By: Date Received: Initial:TRANSMISSION VERIFICATION REPORT 

# I7

- TIME : 05/23/2005 16:21 NAME : DEPT DEQ FAX : 5205622245 TEL : 5205622234
DATE, TIME FAX NO. /NAME IWRATION PAGE(S) ESULT M)DE 05/23 16:21 5623435 00: 00: 35 02 OK STANDARD ECM



### GilaRiver

### Indian Community Depurbnent ofEmironmental Quality AirPropm P.O.Box 

### 97 Sacaton. 

### Az. 

## - 85247 Phone: (520) 562-2234 

### F&: (520) 562-2245


## -.-..-- 

## FAX TRANSMISSION

TO: 

# PI'&(~A3 

# C&iceO+-= Arm: '3dh 

# Wdes Fa: GCQ>-~LC~S

Due: 

## % 

## -&3-0s Re: 

### Pages (includi~g 

### this 

### page): cc:
### Air Quality Monitoring Network Plan – July 2009

B-1 APPENDIX B 

# Detailed Site Information As part of a year 2000 network assessment conducted in cooperation with CARB, detailed site information was compiled for each of the monitoring sites. Following are the site reports that resulted from that effort, all of which are availab le on the CARB website. For information on monitoring objectives, purposes and scales, please refer to the main text of this plan.

• Anaheim • Azusa • Banning Airport • Big Bear • Burbank • Compton • Costa Mesa • Crestline • Fontana • Glendora • Indio • La Habra • Lake Elsinore • LAX Hastings • Long Beach (North) • Los Angeles • Lynwood • Mira Loma (High School) • Mira Loma (Van Buren) • Mission Viejo • Norco • Ontario Fire Station • Palm Springs • Pasadena • Perris • Pico Rivera #2 • Pomona • Redlands • Reseda • Riverside • Rubidoux • San Bernardino • Santa Clarita • South Long Beach • Upland • West Los Angeles
## United States Court of Appeals **For the Eighth Circuit**

___________________________
No. 23

- 3042

___________________________
United States of America

Plaintiff - Appellee

v.

Willie Harbour

Defendant - Appellant

____________ Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha

____________
Submitted: January 16 , 2024 Filed: January 19, 2024 [Unpublished]

____________
Before BENTON

, KELLY , and STRAS , Circuit Judges.

____________

PER CURIAM.

Willie Harbour received a 57

- month prison sentence after he pleaded guilty

to a felon

- in

- possession

- of -a- firearm charge

. See 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). The t wo issues identified in an Anders brief are the enforceability of an appeal waiver in his plea agreement and the substantive reasonableness of the sentence. See Anders v.-2- California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). A pro se supplemental brief questions the validity
of the guilty plea itself

.

The challenge to the plea falls outside the appeal waiver, see United States v.
Schneider , 40 F.4th 849, 853 (8th Cir. 2022), but we conclude that Harbour acted voluntarily and knowingly in entering into it and the district court 1 ha d a reasonable
basis to determine that he committed the offense, s ee United States v. Frook , 616 F.3d 773, 775

– 76 (8th Cir. 2010) (reviewing for plain error when the defendant did not object); see also United States v. Christenson , 653 F.3d 697, 700 (8th Cir. 2011) ( explaining that facts from the plea agreement and presentence report can establish a factual basis). And then, by virtue of the waiver itself , Harbour relinquished the right to challenge the reasonableness of the sentence. See United States v. Scott , 627 F.3d 702, 704 (8th Cir. 2010) (reviewing the validity of an appeal waiver de novo );
United States v. Andis , 333 F.3d 886, 889

– 92 (8th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (explaining that an appeal waiver will be enforced if the appeal falls within its scope, the defendant knowingly and voluntarily entered into the plea agreement and the waiver, and enforcing it would not result in a miscarriage of justice)

.

Finally, w e have independently reviewed the record and conclude that no
other non

- frivolous issues exist. 2 See Penson v. Ohio , 488 U.S. 75, 82

– 83 (1988). We accordingly affirm for the most part , dismiss the sentencing challenge , grant counsel permission to withdraw , and deny the motion to appoint new counsel as

moot

.

______________________________

1 The Honorable Brian C. Buescher, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska.

2 We did, however, spot a clerical mistake, so we modify the judgment to reflect that Harbour was sentenced under 18 U.S.C. § 924(a)(8). See 28 U.S.C. § 2106.
The State of TexasAppellee/s

Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

September 16, 2014

No. 04-14-00374-CR

Luis Arnaldo BAEZ,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee

From the 227th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2013CR6881

Honorable Philip A. Kazen, Jr., Judge Presiding

ORDER

On May 23, 2014, appellant filed his notice of appeal with this court. On July 24, 2014, 

appellant filed notice with this court that the court reporter fees were paid. On August 25, 2014, 

Delcine M. Benavides filed a nine volume reporter’s record. 

On September 10, 2014, court reporter Mary Beth Simpkins filed a late notice of record 

indicating that appellant has failed to pay the fee or make arrangements to pay the fee for preparing 

the record.

We ORDER appellant to provide written proof to this court within ten days of the date of this 

order that the reporter’s record has been requested and either (1) the Ms. Simpkins’ reporter’s fee has 

been paid or arrangements have been made to pay the reporter’s fee, or (2) appellant is entitled to 

appeal without paying the reporter’s fee.

If appellant fails to respond within the time provided, appellant’s brief will be due within 

thirty days from the date of this order, and the court will only consider those issues or points raised in 

appellant’s brief that do not require Ms. Simpkins’ reporter’s record for a decision. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 37.3(c). 

_________________________________

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said court 

on this 16th day of September, 2014.

___________________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court
GTAS 2.6 Enchancements & 

FR Entity Consolidation 
2 L EAD ∙ T RANSFORM ∙ D ELIVER

• New DoD entity comprised of 2 former 

unique Entities

– FR entity 1127 – Foreign Military Financing 

Program

– FR entity 1128 – Foreign Military Sales

• New Entity is Defense Security Cooperation 

Agency

– New FR entity is 1137

• Appendix 5 of TFM 2-4700 being updated to 

reflect the consolidation.

New Consolidated Entity
3 L EAD ∙ T RANSFORM ∙ D ELIVER

• DCSA is comprised of all former FR entity 

1127 and 1128 Treasury Account Symbols 

(TAS)

– All TAS for FR entity 1137 have an AID of 011

– Duplicate Trading Partner AID (TPAID) is 937 

when reporting TPAID only (available to use in 

PD 11 of FY15)

– Nothing Changes for agencies reporting TPAID

and Trading Partner Main Account Code

New Entity Trading Partner AID
4 L EAD ∙ T RANSFORM ∙ D ELIVER

• Webfocus 8.0 upgrade

– Large Reports will complete faster

• SF 133 Shortened 

– Line Titles Shortened

– Extraneous Calculation Detail removed

– More in line with Legacy FACTS II SF 133’s

• Reclassified Statements

– Various Calculation Errors Fixed

– Run by TAS or FR entity

GTAS 2.6 Enhancements
5 L EAD ∙ T RANSFORM ∙ D ELIVER

• Luke Sheppard

Email: Luke.Sheppard@fiscal.treasury.gov

Phone: (304) 480-5104

Contact Information
Document

Exhibit 10.35

David M. Cordani
President and CEO

Routing  W2SLT
900 Cottage Grove Road
Hartford, CT 06152
Telephone  860.226.7482
Facsimile  860.226.3099
December 6, 2020




Eric P. Palmer 


Dear Eric:


I am pleased to offer the following compensation package in connection with your assumption of the role of President, Chief Operating Officer, Evernorth, reporting to Tim Wentworth, effective January 1, 2021, subject to your written acceptance below: 


•Base Salary – will increase to a pre-tax annualized rate of $950,000.  


•Annual Incentive – your annual target will increase to $950,000 for the 2021 performance year.  


•Long-Term Incentive – your annual long-term incentive target will increase to $4,300,000 for the 2021 annual grant.




NEW TOTAL ANNUAL COMPENSATION OPPORTUNITY:            $6,200,000
    
 The changes above have no impact on previously awarded bonuses, stock options, or SPS grants.  As an executive of the company, your compensation will be subject to any future program changes.


Eric, I look forward to continuing to partner with you.


Sincerely,




/s/ David M. Cordani


David M. Cordani


cc:    K. Gorodetzer
       J. Murabito


Please indicate your acceptance of our offer by signing below and returning a copy to me no later than Tuesday, December 8, 2020.


Acceptance:    /s/ Eric P. Palmer


Date:        December 8, 2020
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 216 (Thursday, November 9, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Pages 77371-77372]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-24778]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION


Advisory Committee for Computer and Information Science and 
Engineering; Notice of Meeting

    In accordance with the Federal Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-
463, as amended), the National Science Foundation (NSF) announces the 
following meeting:
    Name and Committee Code: Advisory Committee for Computer and 
Information Science and Engineering (#1115) (Hybrid).
    Date and Time: December 6, 2023; 9:30 a.m.-5:00 p.m. (Eastern); 
December 7, 2023; 9:30 a.m.-12:30 p.m. (Eastern).
    Place: NSF, 2415 Eisenhower Avenue, Room E3450, Alexandria, VA 
22314 (Hybrid).
    To register for in-person attendance or for virtual meeting 
attendees to receive the Zoom link, please send your request to the 
following email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#187b757d6b6b797558766b7e367f776e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="791a141c0a0a181439170a1f571e160f">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Type of Meeting: Open.
    Contact Persons: Chantoye Messam, National Science Foundation, 2415 
Eisenhower Avenue, Alexandria, VA 22314; Telephone:703-292-8900; email: 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1576787066667478557b66733b727a63"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e88b858d9b9b8985a8869b8ec68f879e">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Purpose of Meeting: To provide advice, recommendations, and counsel 
on major goals and policies pertaining to Computer and Information 
Science and Engineering programs and activities.

Agenda

<bullet> NSF and CISE update
<bullet> Report out from the Committee of Visitors for Computing and 
Communication Foundations, Computer and Network Systems, and 
Information and Intelligent Systems Divisions

[[Page 77372]]

<bullet> Computing and Sustainability
<bullet> Broadening Participation in Computing

    Dated: November 6, 2023.
Crystal Robinson,
Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2023-24778 Filed 11-8-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7555-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
TTEL
025

( y fe
gay
p— September 22, 1999

Cynthia L. Johnson

Director, Cash Management Policy and Planning Division
Financial Management Service, Room 420

401 14" Street, SW

Washington, DC 20227

Re: Docket No. 99-19564 — Proposed Revision of Regulations Governing the Treasury Tax and
Loan program — Federal Register: July 30, 1999 (Volume 64, Number 146)

Dear Ms. Johnson,

As an active Treasury Tax & Loan (“TT&L”) participant BankBoston N.A (“BKB”) is pleased
to comment on the proposed TT&L note balance interest rate calculation change. Ifthe current
proposal were adopted by the Department of Treasury (“Treasury”), BKB would drastically
reduce if not eliminate its participation in the TT&L program. Under the current system, the
participating depository institutions provide the Treasury with the flexibility to adjust balances
daily. Depository institutions are in effect compensated by the current rate calculation, Federal
funds rate less 25 basis points, due to increased market risk resulting from day to day changes in
the TT&L balances. Without this incentive, BKB would reduce or eliminate its participation in
the TT&L program.

BKB believes the proposal to change the interest rate calculation would also reduce the overall
participation in the TT&L program, thereby reducing the systemwide maximum capacity. The
reduction in TT&L’s capacity may impact monetary policy particularly during peak times on and
around tax payment deadlines. The New York Federal Reserve Bank (“Fed”) would be forced to
increase their daily open market operations in order to avoid a drain in market liquidity. A
substantial increase in open market operations may result in the Fed having difficulty fully
executing its intended operations.

Additionally, the use of a proposed overnight repo rate would create measurement and historical
relationship issues since the current proposal does not detail the calculation criteria, nor is there
any historical data from which to compare the overnight repo rate versus the Federal funds rate.


In summary, BKB favors rejecting the proposal to change the TT&L rate calculation. We feel
the proposal would reduce banks’ incentive to participate in the TT&L program resulting in
increased systemic liquidity risk due to a loss of flexibility by the Fed.

Please feel free to call if you have additional question regarding our response to the Treasury
proposal. I can be reached at 617-434-4910.

Sincerely,

Craig Starble
Managing Director, Global Funding
**Exhibit 32**

**CERTIFICATION**

In connection with the Annual Report of the Registrant onForm 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersignedcertify pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)     The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

| /s/ Steven R. Williams                                                                                                   |  | April 19, 2005 |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--|----------------|
| Steven R. Williams, Chairman,                                                                                            |  |
| and Chief Executive Officer of Petroleum Development Corporation, Managing General  Partner of the Registrant            |  |
|                                                                                                                          |  |
|                                                                                                                          |  |
| /s/ Darwin L. Stump                                                                                                      |  | April 14, 2005 |
| Darwin L. Stump                                                                                                          |  |
| Chief  Financial Officer and Treasurer of Petroleum  Development Corporation, Managing General Partner of the Registrant |  |

Asigned original of this written statement required by Section 906, or otherdocument authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signaturethat appears in typed form within the electronic version of this writtenstatement required by Section 906, has been provided the Registrant and will beretained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and ExchangeCommission or its staff upon request.
No. 58430.

protests 952583-G, etc. (Baltimore).

#### S. S. Kresge Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of the merchandise marked “P” consist of figures or articles, composed wholly or in chief value of papier máché, the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 56975, the claim at 25 percent under paragraph 1403 as manufactures of papier máché, not specially provided for, was sustained. The items marked “W,” stipulated to consist of articles, composed wholly or in chief value of wood, the same (except the component material of chief value) as the merchandise involved in said Abstract 56975, were held dutiable at 33}¿ percent .under paragraph 412 as manufactures, composed wholly or in chief value of wood, ¡not specially provided for.
Docket Number FAA-2014-0568
No. 57889.

#### The Providence Import Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 175061-K, etc. (Baltimore).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is composed of rush and is not of grass nor of rice straw; that merchandise of like character is now being assessed at 20 percent under said paragraph 1021, as modified, supra; •and that the termination of the said General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade with respect to concessions therein initially negotiated with China (T. D. 52587), insofar as said paragraph 1021 is concerned, related only to floor coverings of grass or of rice straw. ’ Upon the agreed statement of facts, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
BefoRe Chief Judge Bao,

June 26, 1967

No. R67/82.

#### Kurt Orban Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

reappraisement R60/22599 (Jacksonville).

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issues of fact and law are the same in all material respects as those in *Kurt Orban Company, Inc.*v. *United States*(52 CCPA 20, C.A.D. 851), the court found and held that export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, is the proper basis of value for the single loop bale ties in issue and that said value is the appraised value, less inland freight and f .o.b. charges of $8 per metric ton.
Before the Third Division,

January 30, 1946

No. 50856.

#### Protest 973301-G of R. Hirt, Jr., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise consist of portions of cheese packed in boxes and that all such portions, except one portion which is Tilsit, are similar in all material respects to the cheese the subject of *Kraft Phenix Cheese Corp.*v. *United States*(10 Cust. Ct. 271, C. D. 767). In accordance therewith the merchandise in question was held dutiable as claimed.
No. 65390.

#### Seven Seas Merchandising Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 60/24466 (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of dice the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 64186, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# 2014_09 Pivot Table 4

# 2014_09 MTS Table 4 Detail

&F	

&P/&N
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JAMES BIGELOW, : CIVIL ACTION

Plaintiff, :

:

v. : NO. 04-1810

:

GREG WINOKUR, :

Defendant. :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 17 day of November, 2010, the judgment of this court

th

entered in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff on April 10, 2006 will not be vacated

and remains the final Order of the Court in this case.

This case is marked CLOSED.

BY THE COURT:

s/ Ronald L. Buckwalter, S. J.

RONALD L. BUCKWALTER, S.J.
\
September 28, 1999 nit

Ms. Cynthia L. Johnson, Director

Cash Management Policy and Planning Division
Financial Management Service

Department of the Treasury

Room 420

401 14th Street, SW

Washington, D.C. 20227

Re: Proposed Rule - Treasury Tax and Loan Program
Dear Ms. Johnson:

Bank of America Corporation (“Bank of America”) is pleased to respond to the
Department of the Treasury's (“Treasury”) request for comment on its
proposal to change the interest rate Treasury charges on Treasury Tax and
Loan (“TT&L”) note balances. Bank of America, with $614 billion in total
assets, is the one of the largest banks in the U.S., with full-service consumer
and commercial operations in 21 states and the District of Columbia. Bank of
America provides financial products and services to 30 million households
and two million businesses, as well as providing international corporate
financial services for business transactions in 190 countries.

Treasury proposes to change the basis for computing the rate of interest
charged on TT&L note balances from the current formula rate to an explicit
overnight repurchase agreement rate and invites comment on the effect this
change would have on depository institutions’ participation in the TT&L note
program.

Bank of America participation in the program would likely change
significantly. Our utilization of TT&L deposits as a funding source would
likely be greatly diminished, perhaps to near zero, as a result of the increased
costs if the proposal were adopted.

We suggest that the proposed methodology, while providing income to
Treasury at an overnight market rate instead of the formula rate, does not
take into consideration two factors important to program participants: (i)
the volatility of TT&L funds, and (ii) the associated difficulties of planning
availability of collateral. Managing the funding mix to accommodate wide
swings resulting from Treasury’s periodic collection of taxes and disbursal of


Treasury Tax and Loan Program
Bank of America Comments
Page 2

funds is an exacting process which involves costs not associated with more
stable funding alternatives. TT&L deposits, in our view, would be a much
less attractive source of funds if not priced favorably to more stable
alternatives.

Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this issue. If you have any
questions, please contact Alex J. Mason, Jr., Senior Vice President, at (704)
386-6621.

Sincerely,

Patrick M. Frawley
Director, Regulatory Relations
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bayou City Exploration, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Norman
G. Haisler, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


/s/ Norman G. Haisler
-------------------------------------
Norman G. Haisler
Senior Vice President-Finance and
Chief Financial Officer
August 12, 2005