alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Birch Financial, Inc. (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-KSB for the year ending December 31, 2004, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
We, Nelson Colvin, President and Keith L. Walton, Treasurer of the Registrant,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Date: 4/7/05                              /s/Nelson L. Colvin
     --------                             --------------------
                                          Nelson L. Colvin
                                          President

Date: 4/7/05                              /s/Keith L. Walton
     -------                              --------------------
                                          Keith L. Walton
                                          Treasurer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

PATRICK PEREIRA : CIVIL ACTION

 :

 v. : NO. 04-791

:

DISKIN MOTORS, INC., Doing :

Business as CAROUSEL HYUNDAI :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 21st day of December, 2004, upon consideration of the Plaintiff’s

Motion to Quash Deposition Subpoenas Served After the Close of Discovery and for

Sanctions Pursuant to Rule 26(g) (Document No. 27) and after a telephone conference with

counsel for the parties, it is ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED

IN PART.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED as follows:

1. The motion to quash the deposition subpoenas is GRANTED and the

subpoenas issued to Marty Sussman Acura, Hyundai of Turnersville and Prestige Mitsubishi

Volkswagen are QUASHED;

2. The motion for sanctions is DENIED.

 s/Timothy J. Savage 

TIMOTHY J. SAVAGE, J.

Case 2:04-cv-00791-TJS Document 28 Filed 12/22/04 Page 1 of 1
CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT  TO
                            18  U.S.C.  SECTION  1350,
                             AS  ADOPTED  PURSUANT  TO
                  SECTION  906  OF  THE  SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT  OF  2002

IN  CONNECTION  WITH  THE  ANNUAL REPORT OF NEW MEDIUM ENTERPRISES, INC. ON FORM
10-KSB  FOR  THE  PERIOD  ENDING  JUNE 30, 2003 AS FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE  COMMISSION  ON  THE  DATE  HEREOF  (THE  "REPORT"), I, ETHEL SCHWARTZ,
PRESIDENT  &  CHIEF  EXECUTIVE  OFFICER OF NEW MEDIUM ENTERPRISES, INC. CERTIFY,
PURSUANT  TO  18  U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT  OF  2002,  THAT:

(1)  THE  REPORT  FULLY  COMPLIES WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF
1933,  AS  AMENDED;  AND

(2)  THE  INFORMATION  CONTAINED  IN THE REPORT FAIRLY PRESENTS, IN ALL MATERIAL
RESPECTS,  THE  FINANCIAL  CONDITION  AND  RESULTS  OF  OPERATIONS OF NEW MEDIUM
ENTERPRISES,  INC.

/S/  ETHEL  SCHWARTZ
-----------------------
ETHEL  SCHWARTZ
CHIEF  EXECUTIVE  OFFICER
AUGUST  25,  ,  2003




<PAGE>
                                             Page 20
EPA Proposes Deletion of Portions the Eastland Woolen Mill Superfund Site The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announces the proposed deletion of a portion of the Eastland Woolen Mill Superfund site in Corinna, Maine from the National Priorities List (NPL), which is Appendix B of the National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP). EPA and the State of Maine have determined that all appropriate Superfund - financed responses under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Com pensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), have been implemented and that no further cleanup by responsible parties is appropriate for the properties proposed for deletion. Moreover, EPA and the State have determined that remedial actions conducted at the site to date continue to be protective of public health and the environment. This partial deletion does not preclude future actions under Superfund if warranted. The Federal Docket for the Eastland Woolen Mill partial deletion contains the information to suppo rt the partial deletion. The public is invited to comment on the proposed decision to delete portions of this site from the NPL. The public comment period will begin on Aug 2, 2012, and extend for 30 days. Submit your comments, identified by Docket ID no. EPA - HQ - SFUND - 1999 - 0010, by one of the following methods: http://www.regulations.gov . Follow on - line instructions for submitting comments. Email: hathaway.ed@epa.gov Fax: 1 - 617 - 918 - 0372 Mail: Edward Hathaway U .S. EPA Remedial Project Manager 5 Post Office Square (OSRR07 - 1) Boston, MA 02109 - 3912 The Notice of Intent to Partially Delete and the Notice of Partial Deletion are also available on EPA's web page at the following web address: http://www.epa.gov/region1/superfund/sites/eastland . Publicly available docket materials are also available at the EPA Record Center and the Site information repository at the locations listed below: EPA Region 1 Record Center 5 Post Office Square Boston, MA 02109 Phone: 1 - 617 - 918 - 1440 Hours: Mon - Fri 8:00 am to 5:00 pm Stewart Free Library 8 Levi Stewart Drive Corinna, ME 04928 Phone: 1 - 207 - 278 - 2454 Hours: Tuesday, 9 a.m. - 2 p.m.; Wednesday 1 p.m. - 7 p.m.; Thursday 1 p.m. - 7 p.m.; Friday 9:00 a.m. - 2 p.m. Post Date: 2012 - 08 - 02 Bangor Daily News
December 8, 2011

JUDGMENT

The Fourteenth Court of Appeals

CITY OF HOUSTON, Appellant

NO. 14-10-01179-CV V.

LLOYD MORRISON, II, Appellee

____________________

Today the Court heard the parties’ joint motion to dismiss the appeals from the 

judgment signed by the court below on August 31, 2010. Having considered the motion 

and found it meritorious, we order the appeal DISMISSED.

We further order that each party shall pay its costs incurred by reason of this 

appeal.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

We further order the mandate be issued immediately.
# 2017_09 Pivot Table 5B

# 5

&F	

&P/&N
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JEANES HOSPITAL, )

 )

 Plaintiff, ) CIVIL ACTION

 ) NO. 04-cv-0395

 v. )

 )

KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, Secretary of Health )

and Human Services, )

 )

 Defendant. )

ORDER

AND NOW, this 28 day of September, 2010, upon review and consideration of th

Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment [docket entry No. 61]; Defendant’s Cross-Motion for

Summary Judgment and Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion [docket entry Nos. 67 and 68];

Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant’s Cross Motion [docket entry No. 69], Defendant’s Reply to

Plaintiff’s Response [docket entry No. 72]; Defendant’s Notice of Supplemental Authority

[docket entry No. 73]; Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant’s Notice of Supplemental Authority

[docket entry No. 77], as well as the Administrative Record established below, and for the

reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum Opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED;

2. Defendant’s Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED; 

3. The decision of the Administrator of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services

in the matter of Jeanes Hospital v. Wisconsin Physicians Service (formerly Mutual of Omaha

Insurance Company)(Review of PRRB Decision No. 2009-D23), dated July 24, 2009, is hereby

AFFIRMED.
The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to mark this case CLOSED.

It is so ORDERED.

BY THE COURT:

 /s/ Cynthia M. Rufe

___________________________

CYNTHIA M. RUFE, J.
# C_2018112EN.01000402.xml

| 26.3.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 112/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.3.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 112/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 1 February 2018 — Panalpina World Transport (Holding) Ltd, Panalpina Management AG, Panalpina China Ltd v European Commission

(Case C-271/16 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Article 101 TFEU - Price fixing - International air freight forwarding services - Tariff agreement affecting the final price of services))

(2018/C 112/06)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellants: Panalpina World Transport (Holding) Ltd, Panalpina Management AG, Panalpina China Ltd (represented by: S. Mobley, A. Stratakis and A. Gamble, Solicitors)

Appellants:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: V. Bottka, G. Meessen and P.J.O. Van Nuffel, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Panalpina World Transport (Holding) Ltd, Panalpina Management AG and Panalpina China Ltd to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Panalpina World Transport (Holding) Ltd, Panalpina Management AG and Panalpina China Ltd to bear their own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission.

---

(1)  OJ C 243, 4.7.2016.

1

---
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before STEPHENS , DEERWESTER , and BURGTORF

Appellate Military Judges

_________________________ 

### UNITED STATES Appellee

v. Bradley J. CRAGER Operations Specialist Second Class (E

- 5 ), U.S. Navy

Appellant
No. 2022000 3 9

Decided : 29 June 2022
Appeal from the United States Navy

- Marine Corps Trial Judiciary Military Judge : Ryan Stormer
Sentence adjudged 9 November 2021 by a general court

- martial convened at Naval Base, San Diego, California , consisting of a military judge sitting alone

. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment : reduction to E

- 1 , confinement for 23 months , and a bad conduct discharge.
For Appellant: Lieutenant Daniel E. Grunert , JAGC, USN

_________________________ This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2 (a)

.

_________________________United States v. Crager , NMCCA No. 2022000 3 9 Opinion of the Court

2 PER CURIAM : After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of error, we have determined that the findings a nd sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial rights occurred. 1
T he findings and sentence are AFFIRMED

.

FOR THE COURT:

KYLE D. MEEDER Clerk of Court

1 Articles 59 & 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
Exhibit  10.4

                               MANAGEMENT CONTRACT

BETWEEN:

               Crown International Inc.               ("Crown")
          And
               Macwin Investments Inc.                ("Macwin")

          The parties agree as follows:

     l.   From  the 1st day of April, 2002 Macwin agrees to provide to Crown the
          following  services:
          -  services  of  at least three people, each proficient as follows and
          for  monthly  compensation  noted
               (a)  one  person  in  General  Management                $10,000
               (b)  one  person  in  Marketing                          $10,000
               (c)  one  person  for  Professional  Services            $ 5,000
          -    provide  the  capital  and/or  services  or equipment or expenses
               necessary  for  the development of Crown's services, products and
               business  models  and  their  commercial  applications;
          -    provide  full  and  complete  accounts  and  records  for  Crown;
          -    oversee  Development  Crown's  services  and  products;
          -    develop  relationships  with industry participants to further and
               promote  Crown's  services  and  products;
          -    source,  explore  and  develop  Commercial  Applications  and
               commercialization  of  Crown's  products  and  services;
          -    to  assist  with  the sales and marketing of Crown's services and
               products  and  to assist with the development of Crown's business
               models;
          -    assist  Crown  in  its  efforts  to  list  and  trade  it  stock

     2.   No more than once in each and every year after the date hereof, Macwin
          shall  present  to  Crown an invoice for its services as aforesaid and
          Crown  agrees  to pay or provide forthwith to Macwin the value of such
          services.

     3.   This  contract  may be terminated by either party upon 30 days written
          notice  delivered  to  the  other  at  its  usual  place  of Business.

DATED at Toronto this 1st day of April, 2002.

CROWN INTERNATIONAL INC.                 MACWIN INVESTMENTS INC.

By:  /s/ Alan Irwin                      By:  /s/ Lorna Irwin
------------------------                 ----------------------
Alan  Irwin                              Lorna Irwin
Director / Chief Operating Person        President


<PAGE>
Th<.od"o 

### ru D. Sc.h.ai'ø



### Aw ?olL¡¡'hnv. Co 'tyoL Offil,ex 

# Gnnlr Bnsrx 

# Uxrrrnn Arn 

# Porr,uuoN CoNrnoL 

# DrsrRrcr L 5

### 7 S l,,oy+ S+,.LQ+, 13L*L'oV, 

### h'U,foy 

### ^;4' q 3 5A4 -3 53 7 TeL:

## 760-872-82LL Fa+¿

### 760-872-6LOq

Apr1l25,2014

Jared 

### Blumenfeld Regional 

### Administrator EPA Region 9 75 

### Hawthorne Street San Francisco, 

## CA 94105 

### In accordance 

### with 40 CFR Part 58.26, 

### this letter 

### certifies that the ambient air 

### monitoring data 

### for the Great Basin 

### Unihed

### Air Pollution Control 

### District (GBUAPCD) contained 

### in the 

### EPA

### Air Quality System 

### (AQS) as

### of

### April 25,2014 are accurate and complete 

### for the calendar year 

### 2013. Both ambient concentration data andthe 

### quality assurance data have been 

### completely submitted to 

### AQS. These data arc accurate to the best 

### of my knowledgetaking into consideration the 

### quality assurance 

### findings for the calendar year 

### 2013.

### A summary 

### report generated 

### by AQS would, therefore, depict accurate summaÍy statistics for 

### 2013. Both precision and accuracy data 

### for all GBUAPCD monitoring of criteria pollutants in 2013 have also been submitted 

### to AQS. 

### Attached are copies 

### of the

### AQS Quick 

### Look

### All Parameters Report 

### (AMP450NC) and the Data C

### ertification Report (AMP 600). Sincerely,

Theodore 

### D. Schade 

### Air Pollution Control Off,rcer 

# Cc: Matthew Lakin, USEPA Chief

### Air Quality Analysis Ofhce Fletcher 

### Clover, USEPA Region 9

### Air Quality Office Meredith Kurpius, USEPA Region 9

### Air Quality 

### Office David Lutz, USEPA 

### Air Monitoring Group Data 

### Certihcation Contact
No. 55823.

protests 106736-K, etc. (New York).

#### Otto Gerdau Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the-court dismissed the protests.
EXHIBIT 32


In connection with the Annual Report of Real Logic, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ending November 30, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Bradford L. Tolley, Chief
Executive Officer and Treasurer (principal financial officer) of the Company,
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge and belief:


1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



Date:  July 20, 2005
                                  Signed:  /s/ Bradford L. Tolley
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer
1

“A party may not rely on new facts in submissions in response to a motion to dismiss to

defeat the motion.” Hammond v. City of Philadelphia, C.A. No. 00-5082, 2001 U.S. Dist.

LEXIS 10182, at *8 (E.D. Pa. June 29, 2001).

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MOON TAIK LIM : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. :

:

KOREAN CENTRAL DAILY et al. : NO. 02-4072

ORDER

AND NOW, this 13th day of December, 2002, the Defendants having moved to dismiss

the Complaint, and the Plaintiff having filed a brief in opposition, with attachments, which

appears to provide certain information which the Defendants’ Motion contends is fatally absent

from the Complaint, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff is given twenty (20) days to file an

Amended Complaint.1

If Plaintiff files an Amended Complaint, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss will be denied

without prejudice, and Defendants are allowed an additional twenty (20) days to respond, or may

re-file and/or supplement their previously filed Motion to Dismiss.

If Plaintiff does not file an Amended Complaint within twenty (20) days, the Court will

consider the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss with reference to the original Complaint only and

without considering the materials attached to the Plaintiff’s brief in opposition to the Motion to

Dismiss.

BY THE COURT:

 

MICHAEL M. BAYLSON, U.S.D.J.

O:\Orders\Lim v. Korean Central 02-4072 12-13-02.wpd

Case 2:02-cv-04072-MMB Document 10 Filed 12/16/2002 Page 1 of 1
No. 49556.

#### Protests 67818-K, etc., of B. Altman & Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Case No. 8,367.

#### LINDSAY v. TWINING.

[1 Cranch, C. C. 206.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

Dec. Term, 1804.

Practice at Law — Reinstatement op Cause.

The court will not. at a subsequent term, reinstate a cause which has been non prossed for want of security for costs.

Non pros, at last term for want of security for costs.

■ Mr. Woodward moved to reinstate the cause, upon the affidavit of Colonel D. C. Brent, that he had directed the clerk to enter him security, but the clerk had failed so to do. The clerk stated that Colonel Brent had, in his office, told him he would get security.

Motion refused; the term being passed, and the clerk having no light to judge of the sufficiency of the security offered. It should have been offei'ed to the court. The clerk was in no default.
soy crear
Bucree nw

ul

IPAC Operational Metrics for November 2015

Volume by Transaction Type

Dollar Amount! % of Total Dollar Amount| Number of Transactions| _% of Total Number of Transactions|

Fiduciary (investment & Borrowing) 12,157,418,158,218 99.59%) 8,666) 9.04%
Buy/Sell 44,597,694,725 0.37% 85,772 89.44%
Benefits (RITS) 5,217,299,769 0.04% 435 0.45%
Check Aftermath (TRACS) 65,539,303 0.00% 1,025 1.07%
Zero Dollar Ol 0.00% O 0.00%
Grand Total - November 2015 12,207,298,692,015 100.00% 10.00%

Grand Total - October 2015

4,821,981,713,793

October ta November Change 7,385,316,978,222
Percentage Change 153.2%
Grand Total - November 2014 10,032,208,702,478
Nov 2014 to Nov 2015 Change 2,175,089,989,536

Percentage Change

21.7%)
## Comparative Geology and Geochemistry of Sedimentary-Rock-Hosted (Carlin-Type) Gold Deposits in the People's Republic of China and in Nevada, USA

by Zhiping Li1and Stephen G. Peters2



U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 98-466Version 1.3

2001

U.S. Department of the InteriorGale A. Norton, Secretary

U.S. Geological SurveyCharles G. Groat, Director

This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) editorial standards or with the North American Stratigraphic Code. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.

1 Department of Geological Sciences, Mackay School of Mines, Ralph J. Roberts Center for Research in Economic Geology, MS-172, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada 89557-0047.   (or Tianjin Geological Academy, Ministry of Metallurgical Industry, Tianjin City, P.R. China, 300061).

2 U.S. Geological Survey, Reno Field Office, Mackay School of Mines, MS-176, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada 89557-0047

minimap

This publication consists of the online version of a revised CD-ROM publication, U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 98-466.  The data for this publication totaled 204 MB on the old version 1.1 CD-ROM and 247 MB for this online version 1.3.  This online version does not include the Acrobat Search index files.  It also has links rather than files for the Adobe Acrobat Reader installers.

## ABSTRACT

---

## View the report as a set of PDF files

To view the PDF file, CLICK HERE (Of98_466.pdf) (314 KB with links to 7.3 MB).

## View the README file from the CD-ROM

## View the version history

## Download files

### Notes on downloading files using some Web browsers

### Access and PDF files

Go to the section folder where you can get separate PDF files of each of the nine parts.

### Availability of this publication

U.S. Geological SurveyInformation Services, National Mapping DivisionBox 25046Denver Federal CenterDenver, CO  80225-0046 Telephone: (888) ASK-USGS

ISBN:  0-607-92845-X

Current pricing information is available from http://mapping.usgs.gov/esic/prices/.

---

To contact an author, email Steve Peters (speters@usgs.gov).



---
# C_2015118EN.01003601.xml

| 13.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/36

---

Action brought on 4 February 2015 — Ludwig Bertram v OHIM — Seni Vita (Sanivita)

(Case T-58/15)

(2015/C 118/45)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Ludwig Bertram GmbH (Isernhagen, Germany) (represented by: V. Rust-Sorge, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Seni Vita OHG (Bayreuth, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Applicant for the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark No 9949959

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before OHIM

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 21 November 2014 in Case R 1087/2013-1

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should annul the contested decision.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
No. 60735.

#### The River Plate Corporation *v.*United States,

protest 283955-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
No. 61257.

protest 239413-K.

#### Henry C. Schaerf Corp. *v.*United States,

Plaintiff’s application for rehearing denied.