alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 51917.

#### B. Shackman & Co. *v.*United States,

protest 970676-G (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Joseph Schmidt, Inc.*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 188, C. D. 690) the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Before the Second Division,

April 16, 1968

No. P68/204.

protests 64/20872 and 64/20874 (Buffalo).

No. P68/205.

protest 64/20873 (Buffalo).

#### C. J. Tower *&*Sons of Buffalo, Inc. *v.*United States, C. J. Tower & Sons of Buffalo, Inc. *v.*United States,

Rao, C. J.

In accordance witb stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consist of machines, or parts thereof, dedicated for use therewith, which perform independent steps in the manufacture of paper pulp, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Bird Machine Company*v. *United States*(51 CCPA 42, C.A.D. 835) and *A. N.*Deringer, *Inc.*v. *United States*(56 Cust. Ct. 477, C.D. 2681), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
EXHIBIT 32.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the annual report of World
Gaming plc (the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report),I, A. Daniel Moran, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information
contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company. /s/ A. Daniel MoranA. Daniel MoranChief Executive OfficerJune 29, 2006
# 2015_09 Pivot Table 5A

&A	

# 2015_09 MTS Table 5

&F	

&P/&N
Case 2:04-cv-00938-JG Document 6 Filed 05/11/2004 Page 1 of 3

MARY DOE v. MATCH.COM, INC. et al Doc. 6

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:04-cv-00938-JG Document 6 Filed 05/11/2004 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:04-cv-00938-JG Document 6 Filed 05/11/2004 Page 3 of 3
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Con. Res. 73 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. CON. RES. 73

Expressing the sense of Congress that secondary schools should consider 
               starting school after 9:00 in the morning.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 24, 1999

 Ms. Lofgren submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was 
        referred to the Committee on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                         CONCURRENT RESOLUTION

 
Expressing the sense of Congress that secondary schools should consider 
               starting school after 9:00 in the morning.

Whereas scientific studies indicate that adolescents experience hormonal changes 
        that keep them awake at night;
Whereas most secondary schools begin classes at 7:30 or earlier in the morning;
Whereas most teen crime occurs between 3:00 and 6:00 in the afternoon and a 
        later start would result in a later school day; and
Whereas many adolescents do not get enough sleep to realize their full academic 
        potential: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), 
That it is the sense of Congress that secondary schools should begin 
classes after 9:00 in the morning.
                                 <all>
```
No. 54563.

#### Max Schuster *v.*United States,

protests 130962-K, etc. (New York).

*246Opinion by

Oliver, O. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the

merchandise consists of synthetic stones the same in all material respects as those the subject of *S. Nathan & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(37 C. C. P. A. 99, C. A. D. 426), the claim at 10 percent under paragraph 1528 was sustained.
# 		Sorry, something went wrong

An unexpected error has occurred.Web Parts Maintenance Page: If you have permission, you can use this page to temporarily close Web Parts or remove personal settings. For more information, contact your site administrator.

Technical Details

Troubleshoot issues with Microsoft SharePoint Foundation.

Correlation ID: 3aa523a1-5403-a055-6128-0cfdd36fe925

Date and Time: 4/29/2024 12:39:41 AM

----

Go back to site
# C_2016038EN.01007301.xml

| 1.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 38/73 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 38/73

---

Action brought on 2 December 2015 — Makhlouf v Council

(Case T-706/15)

(2016/C 038/98)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Ehab Makhlouf (Damascus, Syria) (represented by: E. Ruchat, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

| — | declare the applicant’s action admissible and well founded; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare the applicant’s action admissible and well founded;

| — | as a consequence, order the European Union to pay compensation for all the damage suffered by the applicant in an amount to be determined by the Court on an equitable basis; |
| --- | --- |

—

as a consequence, order the European Union to pay compensation for all the damage suffered by the applicant in an amount to be determined by the Court on an equitable basis;

| — | order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law, claiming that he has suffered damage for which the Council of the European Union is liable. The plea in law relied on is divided into three parts.

| — | First part, alleging that the measures taken by the Council are unlawful in that, first, the restrictive measures are unjustified and disproportionate and, secondly, they infringe the applicant’s rights to good administration and reputation, and his right to property. |
| --- | --- |

—

First part, alleging that the measures taken by the Council are unlawful in that, first, the restrictive measures are unjustified and disproportionate and, secondly, they infringe the applicant’s rights to good administration and reputation, and his right to property.

| — | Second part, claiming that the applicant has suffered non-material damage because of his inclusion on the list of persons and entities covered by the sanctions against Syria. |
| --- | --- |

—

Second part, claiming that the applicant has suffered non-material damage because of his inclusion on the list of persons and entities covered by the sanctions against Syria.

| — | Third part, claiming strict liability on the part of the European Union in so far as the measures adopted against the applicant abnormally restrict his fundamental rights. |
| --- | --- |

—

Third part, claiming strict liability on the part of the European Union in so far as the measures adopted against the applicant abnormally restrict his fundamental rights.

---
# Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed September 15, 2021. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________ No. 3D21-1033 Lower Tribunal No. F95-9428A

________________ 

### Israel Concepcion, Appellant,
vs. 

### The State of Florida, Appellee.
An Appeal under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Marlene Fernandez-Karavetsos, Judge. Law Office of Shirley L. Bates, and Shirley L. Bates (Tallahassee), for appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Michael W. Mervine, Chief Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. Before LOGUE, HENDON, and MILLER, JJ. PER CURIAM. Affirmed.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 880 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 880

   Recognizing the roles and contributions of America's teachers to 
building and enhancing the Nation's civic, cultural, and economic well-
                                 being.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 8, 2018

  Mr. Graves of Missouri (for himself, Ms. DelBene, Mr. Delaney, Mr. 
Thompson of California, Mr. McGovern, Mr. Bost, Mr. Guthrie, Mr. Emmer, 
    Mr. Perlmutter, Mr. Loebsack, Mr. Pallone, and Mr. Luetkemeyer) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                     on Education and the Workforce

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
   Recognizing the roles and contributions of America's teachers to 
building and enhancing the Nation's civic, cultural, and economic well-
                                 being.

Whereas education and knowledge are the foundation of America's current and 
        future strength;
Whereas the purpose of National Teacher Appreciation Week, held during May 7, 
        2018, through May 11, 2018, is to raise public awareness of the 
        unquantifiable contributions of teachers and to promote greater respect 
        and understanding for the teaching profession; and
Whereas students, schools, communities, and a number of organizations 
        representing educators are hosting teacher appreciation events in 
        recognition of National Teacher Appreciation Week: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives thanks and promotes the 
profession of teaching by encouraging students, parents, school 
administrators, and public officials to participate in teacher 
appreciation events during National Teacher Appreciation Week.
                                 <all>
```
# C_2021206EN.01000301.xml

| 31.5.2021 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 206/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.5.2021

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 206/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 25 March 2021 — Generics (UK) Ltd v European Commission

(Case C-588/16 P) (1)

(Appeal - Competition - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices - Pharmaceutical products - Market for antidepressants (citalopram) - Settlement agreements relating to disputes concerning process patents concluded by a manufacturer of originator medicines who is the holder of those patents and manufacturers of generic medicines - Article 101 TFEU - Potential competition - Restriction by object - Characterisation - Calculation of the amount of the fine)

(2021/C 206/03)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: Generics (UK) Ltd (represented by: I. Vandenborre, advocaat, T. Goetz, Rechtsanwalt, and M. Brealey QC)

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: F. Castilla Contreras, T. Vecchi, B. Mongin and C. Vollrath, acting as Agents, B. Rayment and D. Bailey, Barristers, G. Peretz QC, and S. Kingston, Senior Counsel)

Intervener in support of the defendent: United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (represented by: initially D. Guðmundsdóttir, Z. Lavery and D. Robertson, acting as Agents, and J. Holmes QC, and subsequently D. Guðmundsdóttir, acting as Agent, and J. Holmes QC)

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders Generics (UK) Ltd to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders Generics (UK) Ltd to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by the European Commission;

| 3. | Orders the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to bear its own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland to bear its own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 30, 30.1.2017.

---
---

EXHIBIT 13.2

|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                    
|---------------------------------------------
|18 U.S.C. §1350,                             
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Dorato Resources Inc.
(the Company) on Form 20-F for the year ended January 31, 2010, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I,
Michael Kinley, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                   
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |     |                                                                                                                                                                 
| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.

Dated: February 28, 2011

| | /s/
      Michael W. Kinley
| | ---------------------------
| | Michael W. Kinley          
| | Chief Financial Officer    

---
# C_2018052EN.01000302.xml

| 12.2.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 52/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.2.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 52/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 14 December 2017 — European Bicycle Manufacturers Association (EBMA) v Giant (China) Co. Ltd, Council of the European Union, European Commission

(Case C-61/16 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - Dumping - Regulation (EU) No 502/2013 - Imports of bicycles originating in China - Regulation (EC) No 1225/2009 - Article 18(1) - Cooperation - Definition of ‘necessary information’ - Article 9(5) - Request for individual treatment - Risk of circumvention))

(2018/C 052/04)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: European Bicycle Manufacturers Association (EBMA) (represented by: L. Ruessmann, avocat, and J. Beck, Solicitor)

Appellant:

Other parties to the proceedings: Giant (China) Co. Ltd (represented by: P. De Baere, avocat), Council of the European Union, (represented by: H. Marcos Fraile, Agent, B. O’Connor, Solicitor, and S. Gubel, avocat), European Commission, (represented by J.-F. Brakeland, M. França, and A. Demeneix, Agents)

Other parties to the proceedings:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders the European Bicycle Manufacturers Association (EBMA) to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by Giant (China) Co. Ltd; |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the European Bicycle Manufacturers Association (EBMA) to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by Giant (China) Co. Ltd;

| 3. | Orders the Council of the European Union and the European Commission to bear their own costs. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Orders the Council of the European Union and the European Commission to bear their own costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 106, 21.3.2016.

1

---
No. 51582.

#### Protests 120263-K, etc., of Chas. H. Asche & Co., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protests were dismissed.
# C_2015354EN.01004101.xml

| 26.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 354/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 354/41

---

Action brought on 31 August 2015 — LG Electronics v OHIM — Cyrus Wellness Consulting (VIEWTY SMILE)

(Case T-499/15)

(2015/C 354/50)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: LG Electronics, Inc. (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (represented by: M. Graf, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Cyrus Wellness Consulting GmbH (Berlin, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Applicant of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘VIEWTY SMILE’ — Application for registration No 9 125 601

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before OHIM

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 June 2015 in Joined Cases R 1565/2014-2 and R 1939/2014-2

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Plea(s) in law

Plea(s) in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CRIMINAL ACTION

: NO. 03-632 

v. :

:

IAN NORRIS :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 30th day of November, 2010, it is hereby

ORDERED that Defendant's motion for a judgment of acquittal or,

in the alternative, a new trial (doc. no. 159) is DENIED;

It is hereby further ORDERED that Defendant's motion

for leave to file a reply memorandum in support of Defendant's

motion (doc. no. 196) is GRANTED. 

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

 s/Eduardo C. Robreno 

 EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, J.
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement
Numbers 333-48609, 333-145101 and 333-145103 on Form S-8 of our reports dated March 17, 2008 relating to (i) the consolidated financial statements and schedule of Waste Industries USA, Inc. and subsidiaries (which report express an
unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), Share Based Payment, in 2006, and, FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, in 2007), and (ii) the effectiveness of Waste Industries USA, Inc.s internal control over financial reporting, appearing in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K of Waste Industries USA, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2007.



|                         
|-------------------------
|/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
|                         
|Raleigh, North Carolina  
|March 17, 2008
Before the Third Division,

February 28, 1947

No. 51583.

#### Protests 108175-K, etc., of T. H. Lung Co. et al. (Boston, etc.).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2



                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the EnergySouth, Inc. (the "Company") Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Charles
P. Huffman, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

         1.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
                  amended; and

         2.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.


Date:  August 13, 2002                    By:  /s/ Charles P. Huffman
                                              --------------------------------
                                                   Charles P. Huffman
                                                Senior Vice President and
                                                 Chief Financial Officer
This opinion is subject to administrative correction before final disposition.

Before 

GASTON, HOUTZ, and COGLEY

Appellate Military Judges

_________________________

UNITED STATES

Appellee

v.

Mickey W. JOHNSON, Jr.

Private First Class (E-2), U.S. Marine Corps

Appellant

No. 201800249

Decided: 4 October 2021

Appeal from the United States Navy-Marine Corps Trial Judiciary 

Military Judge: 

Ann K. Minami

Sentence adjudged 7 October 2020 by a special court-martial convened 

at Marine Corps Support Facility Louisiana, consisting of a military 

judge sitting alone. Sentence in the Entry of Judgment: reduction to 

E-1, confinement for 12 months, and a bad-conduct discharge.

For Appellant: 

Lieutenant Michael W. Wester, JAGC, USN

For Appellee:

Brian K. Keller, Esq.
United States v. Johnson, NMCCA No. 201800249

Opinion of the Court

2

_________________________

This opinion does not serve as binding precedent under 

NMCCA Rule of Appellate Procedure 30.2(a).

_________________________

PER CURIAM:

After careful consideration of the record, submitted without assignment of 

error, we have determined that the findings and sentence are correct in law 

and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to Appellant’s substantial 

rights occurred.1

The findings and sentence are AFFIRMED.

FOR THE COURT:

RODGER A. DREW, JR.

Clerk of Court

 

1 Uniform Code of Military Justice arts. 59, 66, 10 U.S.C. §§ 859, 866.
Ott I^StXDJS*

S5im&^^_JL\m}<L ^^XLLo^si—to^i^o^J^ffi&k.

£j^J^£L=Xb=o6^5h=Qj^l

^/^jUj?r?vc_ss-,-^/2.~i^ fAtvA *i j±*r> uotzhiAj bfccai&g. / / . s. ; V^

X IjO^J

-fV

*j^LJ?j£dB^VA^^^

ej9^,

j^uQa^/j^lost^-^aJMi^d^Jd^ steo^dL iNVtlop^

£>$_2<ghi7k 5oi?^ou^_6a!0—j?tei9^_dtii—J^vC—^UoJkjvi^wtoy_.2.Di^.u)tt3_

JtdtJ—^kigSi^

yvy "fe>W? C^jg,/ C,^ (Xjo. i-aosft^ro'

-1 ^J

-RECEIVED*

COURT OFCRIMrNAL APPEALS

OCT 22 2015

AbeiAcosta,Gler^

rmz,.
No. 64774.

#### Ross Products, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 60/3197 (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, O. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of glass ornamental novelties similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 62984, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.