alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2
                               BIB HOLDINGS, LTD.
    CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of BIB Holdings, Ltd. (the Company) on Form
10-KSB for the period ended  December 31, 2003 as filed with the  Securities and
Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the Report),  I, Jeffrey Kaplan,  Chief
Financial Officer of the Company,  certify,  pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  ss.1350,  as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the  requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The  information  contained in the Report  fairly  presents,  in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

A signed  original of this  written  statement  required by Section 906 has been
provided to BIB Holdings,  Ltd. and will be retained by BIB  Holdings,  Ltd. and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

Date:  March 17, 2004


/s/ Jeffrey Kaplan
-----------------------
Jeffrey Kaplan
Chief Financial Officer
No. 58423.

protests 979201-G, etc. (Philadelphia).

#### F. W. Woolworth Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of the merchandise marked *“A”*consist of figures or articles, composed wholly or in chief value of papier máché, the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 56975, the claim at 25 percent under paragraph 1403 as manufactures of papier máché, not specially provided for, was sustained. The items marked “B,” stipulated to consist of articles, composed wholly or in chief value of wood, the same (except the component material of chief value) as the merchandise involved in said Asbtract 56975, were held dutiable at 33^ percent under paragraph 412 as manufactures, composed wholly or in chief value of wood, not specially provided for.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 150 (Monday, August 5, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 47317]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-18871]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL-9843-3; CERCLA-04-2013-3759]

Ore Knob Mine Superfund Site; Laurel Springs, Ashe County, North 
Carolina; Notice of Settlement

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of Settlement.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Under 122(h) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, 
Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA), the United States 
Environmental Protection Agency has entered into a settlement with 
Herbert N. Francis concerning the Ore Knob Mine Superfund Site located 
in Laurel Springs, Ashe County, North Carolina. The settlement 
addresses cost incurred by the agency in conducting a fund lead 
Removal.

DATES: The Agency will consider public comments on the settlement until 
September 4, 2013. The Agency will consider all comments received and 
may modify or withdraw its consent to the settlement if comments 
received disclose facts or considerations which indicate that the 
settlement is inappropriate, improper, or inadequate.

ADDRESSES: Copies of the settlement are available from EPA's 
Environmental Protection Specialist, Ms. Paula V. Painter. Submit your 
comments by site name ``Ore Knob Mine Superfund Site'' by one of the 
following methods:

    www.epa.gov/region4/superfund/programs/enforcement/enforcement.html.
     Email. Painter.Paula@epa.gov.
     U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Attn: Paula V. 
Painter, Superfund Division, 61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 
30303.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Paula V. Painter at 404/562-8887.

    Dated: April 17, 2013.
Anita L. Davis,
Chief, Superfund Enforcement & Information Management Branch, Superfund 
Division.
[FR Doc. 2013-18871 Filed 8-2-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
```
Exhibit No. 32.1
Form 10-KSB
Pegasus Wireless Corp.
File No. 000-32567



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Annual Report of Pegasus  Wireless Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the year and six months ended December 31, 2006 as filed with
the Securities  and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the  "Report"),  I,
Jasper Knabb,  Chief Executive  Officer of the Company,  certify  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1) the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: March 29, 2006   By:  /s/ Jasper Knabb
                          ------------------------------
                            Jasper Knabb
                            Chief Executive Officer


--------------------------------------
This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and  shall not be deemed  filed by the  Company  for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906,  has been  provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.
**EXHIBIT
99.8**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO**
 **RULE
13a-14(a) OR RULE 15d-14(a) OF THE**
 **SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934**
 
 I,
Gordon J. Kerr, certify that:
  1.
    I
      have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of Enerplus Resources
      Fund;2.
    Based
      on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
      material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
      statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
      were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
      report;3.
    Based
      on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
      included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
      financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as
      of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    The
      issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for
      establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
      defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the issuer and
      have:(a)
    Designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
      controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure
      that material information relating to the issuer, including its
      consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
      entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
      prepared;(b)
    Evaluated
      the effectiveness of the issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and
      presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
      disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by
      this report based on such evaluation; and(c)
    Disclosed
      in this report any change in the issuer's internal control over financial
      reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report
      that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
      affect, the issuer's internal control over financial reporting;
      and5.
    The
      issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our
      most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
      the issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the issuer's board of
      directors (or persons performing the equivalent
  functions):(a)
    All
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
      operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
      reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuer's ability to record,
      process, summarize and report financial information;
and(b)
    Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the issuer's internal control
      over financial reporting.
  Date:
      March 14, 2005
    /s/
      Gordon J. KerrGordon
      J. Kerr
      President
      and Chief Executive Officer
      of
      EnerMark Inc.
# 77 OnMay 7, 1999, the Department published aFederal Register Notice ofPublic Workshops, announcing aworkshop forwater heaters onJuly 23, 1999. At the workshop, the Department is seeking discussion ofthe policy implications supported bythe analysis. In addition, the Department willbriefly review the analysis results and any comments on the trial standard levels.
Prior to the public workshop, the Department will make publicly available the anlaytical results that it presently plansto use inits formal decision process. the material to be presented will be the basis for the technical Support Document for theNotice ofProposed Rulemakings. DOE staffand contractors are preparing the material.
We have posted the analyses for water heaters at hhtp://www.eren.doe.gov/buildings/codes_standards/applbrf/waterheater. Please continue to check this site for additional postings. The July 23 workshop format willbe a summary ofthe analytical results that willhave been publicly available prior to theworkshop, followed by a summary discussion ofthe comments received priorto the workshop. A seniorDOE official also will facilitate a discussion on which standard levels participants atthe workshop believe can be supported bythe analyses. The Department will conduct this workshop prior to our selection ofproposed revisions to the energy efficiency standards for water heaters and the Department will consider output from the workshop in the development ofitsproposal. Following the workshop, the Department willprovide an additional comment period, during which interested particies will have an opportunity to comment on the proceedings atthe workshop, as well as on any aspect ofthe rulemaking proceedings, including whatpolicy implications the commenters might draw from the analyses. The following table lists the relevant dates.

Water Heaters

Comments Due on web materials July 6, 1999 Workshop July 23, 1999 Comments Due on workshop August 3, 1999

Please submit your written comments by e-mail to Terr.LogeeZee.doe.gov and/or to Brenda.Edwards-Jones(r.ee.doe.gov Please send one signed copy to: U.S. Department of Energy, Attn: Brenda Edwards-Jones, Office ofEnergy Efficiency and Renewable energy, EE43, 1000 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20585, (202) 586-2945. Please provide 10 copies ofsupporting documentation not attached to the e-mail or delivered electronically.
October 16, 2015

Mr. Belanger

Dronographs

19 Montgomery Avenue

Caribou, ME 04736

Dear Mr. Belanger :

This letter is to inform you that we are unable to process your petition for an exemption from

§ § 61.113(a) and (b), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151, 91.405(a) , 91.407(a), 91.409(a) , 91.417(a)

and (b) of Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR). It explains why we can not

process your request and what you should do in the next 30 days.

Why We Can n o t Process Your Request

We received your July 23, 2015 exemption request on behalf of Dronographs filed in D ocket

No

. FAA− 20 15

− 3114 , but we are unable to process your request any further. Your petition

does no t comply with the requirements of § 11.81 (copy enclosed). For us to consider the

request any further, you must send us all of the following:

 The reasons why granting the request would be in the public interest; that is, how it would

benefit the public as a whole.

 Any additional information, views, or arguments available to support your request.

For more detailed information relating to submitting petitions for exemption, please visit

http://aes.faa.gov/petition/index.html . This website helps the petitioner to meet Federal

Aviation A dministration (FAA) requirement outlines in § 11.81 and helps answer any

questions you may have.

What You Should Do

If you want us to process your request any further, you must submit the requested information

within 30 days. Please note that § 11.63(d) requires you to send your petition for exemption

at least 120 days before the proposed effective date of the exemption.2

If We Do Not Hear From You

If we do not receive the information, we will close the docket without notifying you further.

If you have any questions you may call the 333 Information Line (202) 267

- 2999.

Sincerely,

/s/

Brittany Newton

Program Analyst, Airmen and

Airspace Rules Division

Enclosure s34
Case 2:04-cv-03331-PBT Document 31 Filed 02/08/07 Page 1 of 8
Case 2:04-cv-03331-PBT Document 31 Filed 02/08/07 Page 2 of 8
Case 2:04-cv-03331-PBT Document 31 Filed 02/08/07 Page 3 of 8
Case 2:04-cv-03331-PBT Document 31 Filed 02/08/07 Page 4 of 8
Case 2:04-cv-03331-PBT Document 31 Filed 02/08/07 Page 5 of 8
Case 2:04-cv-03331-PBT Document 31 Filed 02/08/07 Page 6 of 8
Case 2:04-cv-03331-PBT Document 31 Filed 02/08/07 Page 7 of 8
Case 2:04-cv-03331-PBT Document 31 Filed 02/08/07 Page 8 of 8
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Henryk Dabrowski, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Alternet
      Systems Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the "Report") fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
  Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly
      presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Alternet Systems Inc..
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: October 2, 2012

| | /s/HenrykDabrowski           
| | -----------------------------
| | Henryk Dabrowski             
| | President and Director       
| | (Principal Executive Officer)
| | Alternet Systems Inc.        

---
**Exhibit      12 **

**Computation      of Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock      Dividends**

|                                                                                               |   | Nine months endedSeptember 30, |   | Year ended December 31, |   |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|-----------------------------------------------|--------|----------------------------------------|--------|
|                                                                                               |   | 2008                                          |   | 2007                                   |   | 2007 |   | 2006 |   | 2005 |   | 2004 |   | 2003 |   |
| Ratio of Earnings                to Combined Fixed Charges and Preferred Stock Dividends |   |                                          | 1.53   |                                   |   | 1.18 |   |   | 1.30 |   |   | 1.26 |   |   | 1.34 |   |   | 1.16 |   |   | — |   |

|   | · | income                from continuing operations before adjustment for income or loss from                equity investees; plus |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | · | fixed                charges; plus |
|--------|--------|------------------------------------|

|   | · | amortization                of capitalized expenses related to indebtedness;                plus |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | · | distributed                income of equity investees; minus |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | · | preferred                stock dividend requirements of consolidated                subsidiaries. |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | · | interest                expensed; plus |
|--------|--------|----------------------------------------|

|   | · | amortized                premiums, discounts and capitalized expenses related to indebtedness;                plus |
|--------|--------|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | · | preferred                stock dividend requirements of consolidated                subsidiaries. |
|--------|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

----
March 5, 1953

No. 57133.

Suit 4721.

#### August Bentkamp *v.*United States.

C. D. 1370 affirmed November 4,1952. C. A. D. 500.
ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeals of

- )

)

Raytheon Company and Raytheon Missile

Systems )

) ASBCA Nos. 59439, 59440, 59441

)

Under Contract No. W15P7T

- 07

- C

- P207 et al. )

APPEARANCES FOR THE APPELLANT : Karen L. Manos, Esq.

John W. F. Chesley, Esq.

Katherine J. King, Esq.

Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP

Washington, DC

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Arthur M. Taylor, Esq.

DCMA Chief Trial Attorney

Alexander M. Healy, Esq.

Trial Attorney

Defense Contract Management Agency

Hanscom AFB, MA

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

The dispute has been settled. The appeal s are dismissed with prejudice.

Dated: June 14, 2021

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Order of Dismissal of the Armed

Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 59439, 59440, 59441

, Appeals of

Raytheon Company and Ray theon Missile Systems , rendered in conformance with the

Board’s Charter.

Dated: June 15, 2021 CHERYL L. SCOTT

Administrative Judge

Armed Services Board

of Contract Appeals

PAULLA K. GATES

- LEWIS

Recorder, Armed Services

Board of Contract Appeals
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

DOROTHY BICK :

: CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-CV-4109

Plaintiff, :

:

v. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION;

BAYER AG;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE;

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM

:

:

:

:

:

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

:

Defendants. :

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of the Court:

Kindly enter the appearances of Hope S. Freiwald, Aline Fairweather, Erin

Brennan and Kirstin J. Miller as attorneys for defendant SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a

GlaxoSmithKline.

Respectfully Submitted,

_____________________________ _____________________________

Hope S. Freiwald Aline Fairweather

_____________________________ _____________________________

Erin Brennan Kirstin J. Miller

DECHERT PRICE & RHOADS

4000 Bell Atlantic Tower

1717 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2793

(215) 994-4000

Case 2:02-cv-04109-WY Document 7 Filed 09/16/2002 Page 1 of 1
Appendix 9 Sample Financial Statement

A9-1
Sample Financial Statement

A9-2
Sample Financial Statement

A9-3
Sample Financial Statement

A9-4
Sample Financial Statement

A9-5
This page is intentionally left blank.
# C_2015406EN.01004101.xml

| 7.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 406/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 406/41

---

Action brought on 5 October 2015 — Monster Energy v OHIM (GREEN BEANS)

(Case T-585/15)

(2015/C 406/42)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Monster Energy Company (Corona, United States) (represented by: P. Brownlow, Solicitor)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘GREEN BEANS’ — Application for registration No 11 410 801

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 22 July 2015 in Case R 3002/2014-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | remit the Applicant’s case back to the Second Board of Appeal for a decision on the substance of the Applicant’s Restitutio Application in relation to the decision of the First Board of Appeal of 2 December 2013 in Case R 1530/2013-1; |
| --- | --- |

—

remit the Applicant’s case back to the Second Board of Appeal for a decision on the substance of the Applicant’s Restitutio Application in relation to the decision of the First Board of Appeal of 2 December 2013 in Case R 1530/2013-1;

| — | order OHIM to pay their own costs and those of the Applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay their own costs and those of the Applicant.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 58, 65(5), 75, 81(1) and 81(4) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 58, 65(5), 75, 81(1) and 81(4) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Rule 65 of Regulation No 2868/95. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Rule 65 of Regulation No 2868/95.

---