alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2015171EN.01003102.xml

| 26.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/31

---

Action brought on 20 March 2015 — Rotkäppchen — Mumm Sektkellereien v OHIM — Ruiz Moncayo (RED RIDING HOOD)

(Case T-128/15)

(2015/C 171/37)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Rotkäppchen — Mumm Sektkellereien GmbH (Freyburg, Germany) (represented by: W. Berlit, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Alberto Ruiz Moncayo (Entrena, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Applicant: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant:

Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘RED RIDING HOOD’ — Application for registration No 11 299 831

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before OHIM:

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 28 January 2015 in Case R 1012/2014-4

Contested decision:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | annul the decision of the Opposition Division of 27 March 2014 in opposition proceedings No B 2 177 817; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Opposition Division of 27 March 2014 in opposition proceedings No B 2 177 817;

| — | reject the CTM application No 11 299 831; |
| --- | --- |

—

reject the CTM application No 11 299 831;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Plea(s) in law

Plea(s) in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0000878377
<NAME>                        CPX Corp.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1,000
<CURRENCY>                    DOLLARS

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   SEP-30-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         1,269
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      0
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   0
<PP&E>                                             0
<DEPRECIATION>                                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,269
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              0
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                          15
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,254
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,269
<SALES>                                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   0
<CGS>                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                      0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 825
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  878
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              878
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                     878
<EPS-BASIC>                                    .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    .06



</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,

 Respondent

 v.

MANUEL DEL ROSARIO GONZALEZ,

 Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 929 MAL 2014

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the

Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 28th day of May, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

DENIED.
##### 



Exhibit 13.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004 of
Vivendi Universal, S.A. (the Registrant), as filed with the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Jacques Espinasse, Chief Financial Officer of the
Registrant certify, pursuant to 18. U.S.C.1350, that, to my knowledge:  (1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant. /s/ Jacques EspinasseJacques Espinasse Chief
Financial OfficerJune 29, 2005
EagleCashTM is a Stored Value Card that replaces dollar bills and

coins with secure and convenient “electronic currency”. An 

encrypted microchip keeps track of the available balance on the card

automatically, accurately and securely. Cardholders can add funds

to the card at the Finance Office, or at self-service Kiosks (where

available). Funds are deducted from the card when a customer pays

for a product or service with the EagleCashTM card at a merchant on

base. It’s fast, easy and secure!

Q: What does an EagleCashTM card look like?

A: The front of the card looks like this:

EagleCashTM Card

User’s Guide

Microchip Stores

“Electronic 

Currency”

EagleCashTM

logo

The U.S. Department of the Treasury seal appears on the back.

Q: How does an EagleCashTM card work?

A: Customers insert the EagleCashTM card into the store Point of

Sale terminal when instructed to do so by the cashier. The 

available balance on the card is displayed on the terminal. The

cashier enters the purchase amount into the terminal, then the

customer presses “Yes” to approve the sale. Within seconds, the

value of the purchase is deducted from the card. The new 

balance is displayed on the terminal, and the card is released.

Q: Can the customer cancel the transaction?

A: Yes, to cancel a transaction on the Point of Sale terminal, the

customer presses “No” instead of “Yes” when prompted to approve

the sale.
Q: Is the card secure?

A: Yes, your card is protected by advanced cryptographic technology

which ensures the card is valid and the balance is accurate. If a card

is lost, it can be "hotlisted" which tells card-accepting devices that

the card has been cancelled. Information stored in the EagleCashTM

system permits value to be restored to a lost card. A PIN is issued to

secure transactions at the self-service Kiosk. Your electronic 

currency is secure and protected.

Q: How does the customer know how much

value is on their EagleCashTM card?

A: The “balance” of the EagleCashTM card is displayed when the card

is inserted in a Point of Sale terminal, or at a self-service Kiosk

(where available). Once the transaction is complete, the terminal 

displays the “new balance”. The customer can keep paying with the

card anywhere it is accepted until all the electronic currency has

been spent. The customer can reload the card at the Finance Office

or at a self-service Kiosk (where available).

Q: What does the customer do if there is not

enough value left on the EagleCashTM card to

cover the purchase amount?

A: The customer can pay the difference with cash, check, or a 

credit/debit card; or cancel the sale.

Q: What should be done if the customer thinks

his/her EagleCashTM card has more value than

the balance showing on the EagleCashTM

terminal?

A: The customer should request a transaction detail report from the

Finance Office or obtain one from a self-service Kiosk (where 

available).

How to use the EagleCash card

1. Insert card chip side first. 2. Approve purchase.

3. Wait for new balance. 4. Listen for the tone and

remove card.
Before the Second Division,

February 24, 1949

No. 52891.

#### Freedman & Slater, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 939926-G (A), etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of vertical field balances similar in all material respects to the merchandise the subject of Abstract 52267 and *American Askania Corporation*v. *United States*(21 Cust. Ct. 26, C. D. 1121). Since submitting the case upon stipulation, counsel for plaintiffs abandoned protest 939926-G (A)/47618. The abandoned protest was therefore dismissed. With regard to the two remaining protests, i. e., protests 939926-G (B)/47486 and 964550-G/50572, following the cited authorities, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE

FIRST DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT HOUSTON

ORDER

Appellate case name: Patriot Contracting, LLC and Travelers Casualty & Surety Co. of America 

v. Shelter Products, Inc. and Kancor Companies, LLC

Appellate case number: 01-19-00971-CV

Trial court case number: 2014-58350

Trial court: 133rd District Court of Harris County 

The parties’ Joint Motion to Allow Additional Time for Oral Argument is GRANTED. 

Each party will have 20 minutes for oral argument. 

Judge’s signature: __ /s/ Julie Countiss______

acting individually

Date: March 29, 2021
# C_2017374EN.01002401.xml

| 6.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 374/24 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 374/24

---

Order of the President of the First Chamber of the Court of 14 July 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio — Italy) — Comune di Balzola, Comune di Borgo San Martino, Comune di Camino, e.a. v Autorità per le Garanzie nelle Comunicazioni, in the presence of: Poste Italiane SpA

(Case C-275/16) (1)

1

(2017/C 374/34)

Language of the case: Italian

The President of the First Chamber has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 314, 29.8.2016.

1

---
Exhibit 99.4

                     Certification pursuant to Section 1350
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
      --------------------------------------------------------------------


In  connection  with  the Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934 on Form 10-Q of DA Consulting Group, Inc.
(the  "COMPANY")  for  the  period  ended  September 30, 2002, as filed with the
Securities  and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "REPORT"), I, Dennis
C.  Fairchild,  Chief  Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Sec.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002,  that:

     1)   the  Report  fully  complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d)  of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended; and

     2)   the  information  contained  in  the  Report  fairly  presents, in all
          material  respects,  the financial condition and results of operations
          of  the  Company.




                         /s/ Dennis  C.  Fairchild
                         -------------------------------
                         Name:  Dennis  C.  Fairchild
                         Title:    Chief  Financial  Officer
                         Date:     November  12,  2002


                                       21
<PAGE>
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER  PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906  OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 of
OpenTable, Inc. (the "Company") as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Matthew Roberts, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

/s/ MATTHEW ROBERTS Matthew Roberts Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)Date: March 11, 2010


This
certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any
filing of OpenTable, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the
Form 10-K), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.

---



QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 216 (Thursday, November 9, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 77296]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-24903]



[[Page 77296]]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING COMMISSION


Sunshine Act Meetings

TIME AND DATE: 9:00 a.m. EST, Friday, November 17, 2023.

PLACE: Virtual meeting.

STATUS: Closed.

MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: Examinations and enforcement matters. In the 
event that the time, date, or location of this meeting changes, an 
announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, and/or place 
of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's website at https://www.cftc.gov/.

CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: Christopher Kirkpatrick, 202-418-
5964.
    Authority: 5 U.S.C. 552b.

    Dated: November 7, 2023.
Robert Sidman,
Deputy Secretary of the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2023-24903 Filed 11-7-23; 11:15 am]
BILLING CODE 6351-01-P
No. 59942.

#### Baar & Beards, Inc., and Taub, Hummel *&*Schnall, Inc., et al. v. United States,

protests 181953-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silk scarves or squares similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *The Specialty House, Inc., Bryant &*Heffernan, *Inc., et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 136, C. A. D. 585), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Case No. 13,652.

#### SUYDAM et al. v. ALDRICH.

[3 McLean, 383.] 1

Circuit Court, D. Illinois.

June Term, 1844.

Pleading at Law — Variance with Proof— Records.

Any variance between the judgment described in the declaration from that of the record will exclude the record from being received as evidence.

[This was an action by Suydam, Sage & Co. against Aldrich.]

Butterfield & Beaumont, for plaintiffs.

Logan & Little, for defendant.

McLEAN, Circuit Justice.

This action is brought against the defendant for an escape. The declaration stated the judgment, under the execution on which the escape was charged, as having been obtained by the plaintiffs against Elijah Doolittle for $5,590. The record of the judgment introduced as evidence showed that the judgment was entered for $5,522.83 and costs, entered the 8th of December, 1838. The record was objected to as evidence, on the ground that it varies from the judgment described in the declaration. This variance is fatal. A judgment to be used in evidence, as the foundation of the action, must be described with entire accuracy. It being a matter of record, there is no reason why the true statement of the amount should not be made. The record of the judgment cannot be read in evidence.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). R G S: Rese ar ch NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON

UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T DA VI D WAY NE WI L S ON , P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. S C O T T K E RN A N , D ir e c to rA du lt I n s titu tio n s ; e t a l., D efen d an t s - A p p el l ees. N o. 08- 15396 D . C. N o . CV - 0 7 - 0 0 6 1 6 - G EB/ EFB ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e E a s te rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia G a r l a nd E . B urr e l l , J r . , D i s tr i c tJudge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d F e brua ry16, 2010 ** B efo re: F E RN A N D E Z , G O U L D , an dM . S M IT H , C i rcu i tJu d g es. D av i dW ayn e W i l so n , a C al i fo rn i a st at e p ri so n er, ap p eal s pro se f r om the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s j udgm e ntdi s m i s s i ng w i th pr e j udi c e hi s 42 U . S . C . § 1983 a c t i on



# FI LED MA R 05 2010 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALSR G S: Res ea r ch 08- 15396 2 c l a i m i ng vi ol a t i ons of

hi s due pr oc e s s r i ght s . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 U. S . C . § 1 2 9 1 . We r e v i e w de nov o the di s tr i c tc ourt ’ s di s m i s s a l of ac om pl a i ntf

or f a ilu r e to s ta te ac la im u n d e r2 8 U .S .C . § 1 9 1 5 A , R es ni ck v. H ayes , 213 F . 3d 443, 4 4 7 ( 9 th Ci r . 2 0 0 0 ) , a n dw e a f f i rm. T he di stri ctcourtprop er l y di sm i ss ed W i l son’ s c om pl ai ntbecause he f ai l ed t o a l l e ge the vi ol a t i on of a nyr i ghta r i s i ng unde rthe U ni t e d S t a t e s C ons t i tut i on or f e d e r a l la w , a s r e qu ir e df o raS e c tio n 1 9 8 3 c la im . See San di n v. C on ner , 5 1 5 U . S. 4 7 2 , 4 8 3 ( 1 9 9 5 ) . A s to W ils o n ’s s u b s ta n tiv e du e p r o c e s s c la im , p la c e m e n t in a dm i ni s tr a t i ve s e gr e ga t i on doe s noti m pos e the type of “ a typi c a l ors i gni f

i c a nt ha r ds hi p on the i nm a t e i n r e l a t i on t o the i nc i de nt s of pr i s on l i f

e ” t o gi ve r i s e t o a p r o te c te dlib e rtyin te r e s t. Id . a t 4 8 3 - 8 4 ; s e e a ls o M a yv . B a ldw in , 109 F . 3d 557, 565 ( 9th C i r . 1997) . N ordoe s W i l s on a l l e ge f a c t s i n s upportof

apr oc e dur a l due pr oc e s s c l a i m , w hi c h w oul d r e qui r e l a c k of not i c e a nd opportuni tyf orhe a r i ng p r e c e d in g th e d e p r iv a tio n o f lif e , lib e rty , o rp r o p e rty . Se e L one StarSe c . & V i de o, Inc. v. C i t

y of L os A ng eles , 5 8 4 F .3 d1 2 3 2 , 1 2 3 6 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 9 ) . W ils o n f a ile dto a l l e ge apr ot e c t e d i nt e r e s t , a nd a dm i t s thathe both r e c e i ve d a dva nc e not i c e of the te m p o r a ryd ir e c tiv e a t is s u e a n de x e r c is e dth e o p p o rtu n ityto c h a lle n g e it. AF F I RME D.
---

CONSENT OF AUTHOR

Greg Ross, P. Geo
620 East 20th Avenue,  
Vancouver, BC   V5V 1N1

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission

I, Greg Ross, P. Geo, certify that I have read the written disclosure being filed and I do not have any reason to believe that there are any misrepresentations in the written disclosure in the Form 20F of Giga Metals Corporation.

I do hereby consent to the filing with the regulatory authorities.

I consent to being an expert in the 2017 Form 20F Annual Report.

Dated this 30th day of April, 2018.

“Greg Ross”

Greg Ross, P. Geo

---
Copyright © 2014 American Water Works Association
Webinar Moderator

No Image

Available

2

Randy Moore

Vice President Market 

Development 

Utility Service Group

Randy Moore has been with Utility Service Group (USG) since 1998 and is currently Vice President of Market 

Development. Randy travels nationwide to promote USG’s line of integrated sustainable products and services for 

potable water distribution systems. He is also responsible for identifying and developing new technologies and 

innovation for USG. Randy has more than (35) years of experience in industrial sales and marketing. In addition, he 

serves on several AWWA Committees and Councils: the AWWA D102 Revision Task Force (as a voting member), the 

Distribution System Water Quality Committee, the Distribution System Operations & Maintenance Committee, the 

Steel Tank Committee, the Manufacturers & Associates Council (MAC), and as the MAC liaison to the Technical & 

Educational Council.
Panel of Experts

3

Mark Johnson

Director, Metropolitan Water 

Operations and Maintenance

Massachusetts Water 

Resources Authority

Todd Brewer

Assistant Manager -

Laboratories

City Utilities of Springfield, MO

Andrew Hill

Project Manager

Confluence Engineering
Agenda

4

I. Case Study on Asset 

Management and Impact on 

Water Quality

II. Distribution System Optimization 

& Water Quality Management 

Efforts at City Utilities 

III. Main Cleaning – a Tool for 

Distribution System Water 

Quality and Asset Management

Mark Johnson

Todd Brewer

Andrew Hill
Subject Overview

• What does it really mean to say “water quality management 

and asset management working together”?

• What would an example look like in a distribution system?

5
For Example...

• Water Storage Tanks

6
Asset Mgt. = WQ Mgt.

Tank Asset Mgt conditions maintained in an effective tank asset management 

program:

1. Safety Conditions

2. Sanitary Conditions*

3. Security Conditions*

4. Structural Conditions

5. Coatings Conditions*

* Directly impacts water quality

7
Asset Mgt. = WQ Mgt.

8

Vent Maintenance
Asset Mgt. = WQ Mgt.

9

Roof Penetrations
Asset Mgt. = WQ Mgt.

10

Roof Hatch
Asset Mgt. = WQ Mgt.

11

Water Quality Impact
Asset Mgt. = WQ Mgt.

12

Water Quality Impact
Asset Mgt. = WQ Mgt.

13

Interior Coatings 

Maintenance
Asset Mgt. = WQ Mgt.

14

Water Quality Impact
Asset Mgt. = WQ Mgt.

15

Lack of Tank Mixing

Water Quality Impact
Asset Mgt. = WQ Mgt.

16

Sediment Removal
Asset Mgt. = WQ Mgt.

17

Sediment Removal
Asset Mgt. = WQ Mgt.

18

Sediment Removal
Asset Mgt. = WQ Mgt.

19
Poll Question #1

Have you ever experienced asset management impacting water 

quality management within your distribution system?

a) Yes

b) No

20
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 23.04


                       Consent of Independent Accountants


We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement of
CSK Auto Corporation relating to the CSK Auto Corporation 1996 Executive Stock
Option Plan (as Amended and Restated) on Form S-8 (Registration No. 333-_______)
of our report dated April 2,1999 on our audits of the consolidated financial
statements of CSK Auto Corporation and subsidiaries as of January 31, 1999 and
February 1, 1998, and for each of the three years in the period ended
January 31, 1999.





PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP

August 27, 1999
EXHIBIT 13.1  Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with this Annual Report for Fiscal 2011 Ended August 31, 2011 of Golden Goliath Resources Ltd., a company organized under the British Columbia Corporations Act(the Company) on Form 20-F as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, J. Paul Sorbara, President and Director of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  /s/ J. Paul Sorbara J. Paul Sorbara, President/Director   Date: February 6, 2012