alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 904 

Expressing support for the designation of the first Tuesday in June as 

‘‘National Cancer Survivor Beauty and Support Day’’. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 18, 2018 

Mr. SCHNEIDER (for himself and Mr. HUIZENGA) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the designation of the first Tuesday 

in June as ‘‘National Cancer Survivor Beauty and Support Day’’. 

Whereas it is estimated that 1,735,350 new cases of cancer 

will be diagnosed in the United States in 2018; 

Whereas the lifetime probability of a male or female developing cancer is 1 in 3; 

Whereas a cancer survivor is defined as anyone who has been 

diagnosed with cancer, from the time of diagnosis 

through the balance of his or her life; 

Whereas the National Cancer Institute reports that there are 

15,500,000 cancer survivors in the United States; 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 904 IH 

Whereas cancer treatments can have severe, prolonged, or 

permanent side effects, both physical and psychological; 

Whereas men, women, and children all have been diagnosed 

with and battled cancer; 

Whereas it is important to recognize the value of support for 

all men, women, and children cancer survivors and the 

positive impact support has for both patients and families; 

Whereas ‘‘Cancer Survivor Beauty and Support Day’’ is a 

purely volunteer event where thousands of volunteers 

from the spa, beauty, and related industries freely give 

their support and services to all cancer survivors; 

Whereas ‘‘Cancer Survivor Beauty and Support Day’’ has expanded to thousands of salons in all 50 States since its 

inception in 2003; 

Whereas ‘‘Cancer Survivor Beauty and Support Day’’ is recognized by both State and local governments; 

Whereas ‘‘Cancer Survivor Beauty and Support Day’’ is the 

only event of its kind, with no solicitation of funds either 

before, during, or after the event; and 

Whereas the first Tuesday in June would be an appropriate 

date to designate as ‘‘National Cancer Survivor Beauty 

and Support Day’’: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives supports 

2 the designation of ‘‘National Cancer Survivor Beauty and 

3 Support Day’’. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
# C_2018005EN.01001002.xml

| 8.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 5/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 5/10

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 9 November 2017 (reference for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal da Relação do Porto — Portugal) — António Fernando Maio Marques da Rosa v Varzim Sol — Turismo, Jogo e Animação, SA

(Case C-306/16) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Protection of the safety and health of workers - Directive 2003/88/EC - Article 5 - Weekly rest period - National legislation providing for at least one rest day per seven-day period - Periods of more than six consecutive working days))

(2018/C 005/13)

Language of the case: Portuguese

Referring court

Referring court

Tribunal da Relação do Porto

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: António Fernando Maio Marques da Rosa

Applicant:

Defendant: Varzim Sol — Turismo, Jogo e Animação, SA

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 5 of Council Directive 93/104/EC of 23 November 1993 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time, as amended by Directive 2000/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 June 2000 and the first paragraph of Article 5 of Directive 2003/88/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 November 2003 concerning certain aspects of the organisation of working time must be interpreted as not requiring the minimum uninterrupted weekly rest period of 24 hours to which a worker is entitled to be provided no later than the day following a period of six consecutive working days, but requires that rest period to be provided within each seven-day period.

---

(1)  OJ C 326, 5.9.2016.

1

---
No. 53957.

#### McKesson & Robbins, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 110694-K, etc. (New York).

*352Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Por the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ELIZABETH PICHLER, et al. : CIVIL ACTION

:

 v. :

:

UNITE (UNION OF NEEDLETRADES, :

INDUSTRIAL & TEXTILE EMPLOYEES :

AFL-CIO) : NO. 04-2841

JUDGMENT

AND NOW, this 22nd day of February, 2011, in accordance

with the Memorandum and Order entered this day, JUDGMENT IS

ENTERED in favor of the Plaintiff Class and against defendant

UNITE (UNION OF NEEDLETRADES, INDUSTRIAL & TEXTILE EMPLOYEES AFLCIO).

BY THE COURT:

__\s\Stewart Dalzell

Case 2:04-cv-02841-SD Document 318 Filed 02/22/11 Page 1 of 1
No. 67776.

#### S. M. Iida, Ltd., and American Customs Brokerage Co. *v.*United States,

protests 61/24762, 62/3728, and 62/10629 (Honolulu).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel, the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: The items referred to on the invoices as S-2, S-3, and S-30, cups, at 10 cents per dozen pieces and 20 percent ad *318valorem and the items referred to as S-9, S-10, and S-ll, teapots, at 10 cents per dozen pieces and 25 percent ad valorem, as claimed.
October 20, 1960

No. 64768.

Suit 5008.

#### B. A. McKenzie & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States.

A.R.D. 103 affirmed July 20, 1960. C.A.D. 748.
No. 52191.

protests 615087-G, etc. (New York).

#### Lou Friedman et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Kinchblob, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Skip to Content

        -   Log in            -  Log inEmailPassword Show Password	            Remember meAlready have an account? Log in!No account? Sign up!Forgot your password?Didn't receive confirmation instructions? 
        -            -  Forgot your password?Email Already have an account? Log in!No account? Sign up!Forgot your password?Didn't receive confirmation instructions? 
        -            -  Resend confirmation instructionsEmail Already have an account? Log in!No account? Sign up!Forgot your password?Didn't receive confirmation instructions? 
        -   Sign Up            -  Sign upEmail Password Passwords must be at least 6 characters and contain at least one lower-case letter, one upper-case letter, one number, and one punctuation mark or symbolPassword confirmation  Show Password            Already have an account? Log in!No account? Sign up!Forgot your password?Didn't receive confirmation instructions? 

# Search Publications

- Home

#           Small Grains            NASS

----

Frequency of Release:Annually

----

Category:Crops and Crop Products:Grains and Oilseeds

Keywords:barleyoatsseedswheatwinter barley

----

## Releases

| Jan 10, 1986 | PDF | Jan 10, 1986: Small Grains detailsx                Jan 10, 1986: Small GrainsRelease datetime:Jan 10, 1986Close |
|--------------|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

Contact office name:National Agricultural Statistics Service

Contact email:nass@nass.usda.gov

##         Agency Announcements        
Do you also want to subscribe to all agency announcements from ?
NoYesFooter content with page navigation, site information, and copyright.-  Home 
-  Release Calendar 
×Release CalendarClose
-  About
-  Help 
-  Contact 
-  API 

The USDA Economics, Statistics and Market Information System (ESMIS) contains over 2,100 publications from five agencies of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). These materials cover U.S. and international agriculture and related      topics. Mann Library at Cornell University developed and maintains this site.

© 2024 USDA Economics, Statistics and Market Information System
USDA ESMIS partners list with links to their websites.Partners:- Agricultural Marketing Service (AMS)
- Economic Research Service (ERS)
- Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS)
- National Agricultural Statistics Service (NASS)
- World Agricultural Outlook Board (WAOB)
- 
- Albert R. Mann Library, Cornell University
- United States Department of Agriculture
Cornell development contact information.Developed & supported by:
**Albert R. Mann Library**Cornell UniversityIthaca, NY 14853-4301 Phone: (607) 255-3296 Email: usda-help@cornell.edu
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JAN-01-2000             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-04-1999             JAN-03-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               OCT-02-1999             OCT-02-1999
<CASH>                                             574                     574
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                     33,828                  33,828
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                35,324                  35,324
<PP&E>                                           8,275                   8,275
<DEPRECIATION>                                   3,124                   3,124
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  41,118                  41,118
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           20,931                  20,931
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             7                       7
<OTHER-SE>                                      18,652                  18,652
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    41,118                  41,118
<SALES>                                         18,469                  49,912
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                18,469                  49,912
<CGS>                                           12,292                  33,055
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   12,292                  33,055
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 5,634                  13,772
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 168                     439
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    375                   2,646
<INCOME-TAX>                                       130                   1,016
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                245                   1,630
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                       245                   1,630
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .04                     .24
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .04                     .24


</TABLE>
**Exhibit 31.2****CERTIFICATION**     I, Wayne W. Byers, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of ebank Financial Services, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;     4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter(the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting;     5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small businessissuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.Date:November 13, 2006         By:       /s/ Wayne W. Byers    Wayne W. Byers, Chief Financial Officer
QS paca:

IPAC Operational Metrics for February 2020

Percentage Change

5.4%

* Failed File Processing - ail files that fail initial processing are resubmitted and eventually process successfully. The file failure noted here occurred on

February 5th and was the result of @ hung cione in the IPAC infrastructure.

‘Volume by Transaction Type
Dollar Amount} % of Total Dollar Amount! Number of Transactions| _% of Total Number of Transactions
Fiduciary (investment & Borrowing) 16,301,368, 140,795] 99.73%] 14,186] 12.99%
[Buy/Sell 38,348,700,126| 0.2396) 93,908) 86.02%
Benefits (RITS) 6,243,142,921| 0.0456 369] 0.34%
Check Aftermath (TRACS) 84,618,796} 0.0036) 710! 0.65%
Zero Dollar o 0.0036) | 0.00%
|Grand Total - February 2020 16,346,044,602,638) 100.00%6| 109,173} 100.00%|
|Grand Total - January 2020 16,766,750,798,943) 100.00%6| 106,742) 100.00%6|
[January to February Change ~420,706,136,304] 23]
Percentage Change 25% ee
os
[Grand Total - February 2019 15,510,301,100,049|
[Feb 2019 to Feb 2020 Change £835,743,502,589| a
# C_2016016EN.01004601.xml

| 18.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 16/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

18.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 16/46

---

Action brought on 10 November 2015 — Spa Monopole v OHIM — YTL Hotels & Properties (SPA VILLAGE)

(Case T-625/15)

(2016/C 016/55)

Language in which the application was lodged: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Spa Monopole, compagnie fermière de Spa SA/NV (Spa, Belgium) (represented by: E. Cornu and E. De Gryse, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: YTL Hotels & Properties Sdn Bhd (Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant for the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘SPA VILLAGE’ — Application for registration No 3 841 202

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before OHIM

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 September 2015 in Case R 1954/2013-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of TenFold Corporation
(the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Nancy M. Harvey, President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



/s/ Nancy M. Harvey

---

Nancy M. Harvey

President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer

July
29, 2004
EXHIBIT 99.12

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Enerplus Resources Fund (the "Fund") on Form 40-F for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert J. Waters, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of
EnerMark Inc., on behalf of the Fund, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

/s/ ROBERT J. WATERS Robert J. Waters
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of EnerMark Inc.


March 12,
2010

The foregoing certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that
section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically
incorporates it by reference.

---



QuickLinks
# C_2018341EN.01001002.xml

| 24.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 341/10 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 341/10

---

Order of the President of the Court of 7 June 2018 — Guccio Gucci SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), Guess? IP Holder LP

(Case C-675/16 P) (1)

(2018/C 341/13)

Language of the case: English

The President of the Court has ordered that the case be removed from the register.

---

(1)  OJ C 144, 8.5.2017.

---
Before the Second Division,

January 16, 1946

No. 50816.

#### Protests 20322-K, etc., of Haddad & Son et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that passed upon in *Stephen Rug Mills*v. *United States*(32 C. C. P. A. 110, C. A. D. 293), and by the court’s decision on remand in Abstract 50056. In accordance therewith the protests were sustained as claimed.
# C_2018328EN.01000401.xml

| 17.9.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 328/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.9.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 328/4

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 25 July 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Frankfurt am Main — Germany) — Georgsmarienhütte GmbH, Stahlwerk Bous GmbH, Schmiedag GmbH, Harz Guss Zorge GmbH v Bundesrepublik Deutschland

(Case C-135/16) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - State aid - Scheme for the support of renewable electricity sources and energy-intensive users - Decision (EU) 2015/1585 - Validity in the light of Article 107 TFEU - Admissibility - Failure by the applicants in the main proceedings to bring an action for annulment))

(2018/C 328/04)

Language of the case: German

Referring court

Verwaltungsgericht Frankfurt am Main

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Georgsmarienhütte GmbH, Stahlwerk Bous GmbH, Schmiedag GmbH, Harz Guss Zorge GmbH

Defendant: Bundesrepublik Deutschland

Operative part of the judgment

The request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Frankfurt am Main (Administrative Court, Frankfurt am Main, Germany), by decision of 23 February 2016, is inadmissible.

---

(1)  OJ C 211, 13.6.2016.

---
Prone: 573-324-2233 Prone: 636-528-6088

Fax: 573-324-2559 cI Fax: 636-528-9031
117 W. CHurcn { 101 Tyme Square
P.O. Box 370 ( \N )
Bowune Green, MO 63334 y
I

SS OC
Ce ity State Bank
ommuri an 1

| STR
Oi THE
Community State Bank of Bowling Green

WILLIAM C. McILROY JOHN M. McILROY SR. JOHN M. McILROY JR.
President General Counsel Chairman of Board
TAPLEY McCUNE \
Exec. Vice President & CEO
PAUL B. HILL, Vice President TRUDY MCCONNELL, Assi. Cashier
MARK. A. GOODIN, Vice President August 14, 1999 CATHY COLBERT, Data Processing Officer
EARL NIEMEYER, Asst. Vice President BARBIE GAMM, Operations Officer
JEANNE MCKEE, Cashier MARCIA BURNETT, Check Processing Officer

Cynthia L. Johnson, Director

Cash Management Policy &% Planning Division
Financial Management Service

Room 420

401 14th St. SW

Washington, D.C. 20227

Dear Ms. Johnson:

This letter is a comment concerning the proposed changes in the
rate charged on TT&L Depositaries. I fully understand the need of
the United States government in receiving all it can get to reduce
debt. However, I do not understand the reason for coming back to
the local community banks again for additional money. It appears
to me that the increase that we would have to pay for those
accounts would only cost us more money than it already does.

Currently we pay almost the Fed Fund rate for that deposit. That
deposit is a high maintenance deposit because of the number of
deposits being made to it and these are being done on your behalf.
Considering the amount of work that we do for this account and how
it helps the United States government, I feel that you asking for
additional interest on this account is unfair and unjustified.
Please drop this proposal and let things remain the way they are.

Vice President

PBH:cf