alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 13.2



Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with this Amendment to the Annual Report for Fiscal 2008 Ended August 31, 2008 of Golden Goliath Resources Ltd., company organized under the British Columbia Corporations Act(the Company) on Form 20-F as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Stephen Pearce, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



/s/ Stephen Pearce

Stephen Pearce, Chief Financial Officer





Date: July 21, 2009





#
Before the First Division,

October 10, 1957

No. 61247.

protests 293013-K, etc. (New York).

#### Friedman Mirror & Glass Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of glass strips, specially designed and manufactured for use as a frame around mirrors, the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Friedman Mirror & Glass Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(34 Cust. Ct. 236, C. D. 1710), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
# C_2015236EN.01004802.xml

| 20.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 236/48 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 236/48

---

Action brought on 26 May 2015 — Edison v OHIM — Eolus Vind (e)

(Case T-276/15)

(2015/C 236/64)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Edison SpA (Milan, Italy) (represented by: D. Martucci, F. Boscariol de Roberto and I. Gatto, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Eolus Vind AB (publ) (Hässleholm, Sweden)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Applicant: Applicant

Applicant:

Trade mark at issue: Figurative mark containing the letter ‘e’ — Application for registration No 10 420 941

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before OHIM

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 24 February 2015 in Case R 2358/2013-1

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
<PAGE>
                                                                    Exhibit 99.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         I, Scott D. Dorfman, Chief Executive Officer of Innotrac Corporation
(the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 as adopted by ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly
         period ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the
         requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
         of 1934; and

(2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.

Dated: August 13, 2002



                               /s/ Scott D. Dorfman
                               -----------------------------------------------
                               Scott D. Dorfman
                               President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
                               of the Board
No. 61756.

#### Applicator Enterprises, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 301037-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of sponges similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 61191, the merchandise entered, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, prior to September 10, 1955, was held dutiable at 25 percent under paragraph 1537 (b) and that entered, or withdrawn for consumption, on or after September 10, 1955, was held dutiable at 12% percent under said paragraph, as modified, *supra,*as claimed.
# C_2017424EN.01000302.xml

| 11.12.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 424/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

11.12.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 424/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 19 October 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Curtea de Apel Cluj — Romania) — SC Paper Consult SRL v Direcția Regională a Finanțelor Publice Cluj-Napoca, Administrația Județeană a Finanțelor Publice Bistrița-Năsăud

(Case C-101/16) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Taxation - Value added tax (VAT) - Directive 2006/112/EC - Right to deduct - Conditions governing the exercise of that right - Article 273 - National measures - Fight against tax evasion and tax avoidance - Invoice issued by a taxpayer declared ‘inactive’ by the tax authorities - Risk of tax evasion - Refusal of the right to deduct - Proportionality - Refusal to take into account evidence of the absence of tax evasion or tax losses - Limitation of the temporal effects of the judgment to be delivered - No limitation))

(2017/C 424/04)

Language of the case: Romanian

Referring court

Referring court

Curtea de Apel Cluj

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: SC Paper Consult SRL

Applicant:

Defendants: Direcția Regională a Finanțelor Publice Cluj-Napoca, Administrația Județeană a Finanțelor Publice Bistrița-Năsăud

Defendants:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Council Directive 2006/112/EC of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax must be interpreted as precluding national rules, such as those at issue in the main proceedings, under which the right to deduct value added tax is refused to a taxable person on the ground that the trader which supplied a service to that taxable person and issued a corresponding invoice, on which the expenditure and the value added tax are indicated separately, has been declared inactive by the tax authorities of a Member State, that declaration of inactivity being public and accessible on the internet to any taxable person in that State, in the case where that refusal of the right to deduct is systematic and final, making it impossible to adduce evidence that there was no tax evasion or loss of tax revenue.

---

(1)  OJ C 175, 17.5.2016.

1

---
EXHIBIT 32.2
                                                                    ------------

              SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

            Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, the undersigned officer of GMX
Resources Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certifies that the Company's Annual
Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the "Report"), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report
fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

Dated:        April 14, 2004                /s/ Ken L. Kenworthy, Sr.
             ----------------               ------------------------------------
                                            Name:  Ken L. Kenworthy, Sr.
                                            Title: Chief Financial Officer
No. 56338.

protests 173245-K and 174853-K (New York).

#### Vintage Wines, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the facts and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested not found were not in fact received by the importer. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited it was held that duty and internal revenue tax are not assessable upon such portions of the merchandise as were reported by the inspector as manifested not found. The protests were sustained to this extent.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                       2,747,719
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               18,728,699<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                   650,000
<INVENTORY>                                  7,258,282
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            34,706,221
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                               9,005,655
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,526,940
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       86,320,006
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        85,268
<OTHER-SE>                                  35,800,697<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                86,320,006
<SALES>                                     79,653,793
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            79,653,793
<CGS>                                       53,001,370
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               22,884,704
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           1,191,695
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              2,576,024
<INCOME-TAX>                                 1,236,492
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          1,339,532
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 1,339,532
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.17
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.16
<FN>
<F1>AMOUNT REPRESENTS NET ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE.
<F2>AMOUNTS INCLUDES ADDITIONAL PAID-IN CAPITAL, RETAINED EARINGS, AND TREASURY
STOCK.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MARY STEINHAUER and

ALBERT STEINHAUER

:

:

: CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-CV-4257

Plaintiffs, :

:

v. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION;

BAYER AG;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE;

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM

:

:

:

:

:

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

:

Defendants. :

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of the Court:

Kindly enter the appearances of Hope S. Freiwald, Aline Fairweather, Erin

Brennan and Kirstin J. Miller as attorneys for defendant GlaxoSmithKline PLC.

Respectfully Submitted,

_____________________________ _____________________________

Hope S. Freiwald Aline Fairweather

_____________________________ _____________________________

Erin Brennan Kirstin J. Miller

DECHERT PRICE & RHOADS

4000 Bell Atlantic Tower

1717 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2793

(215) 994-4000

Case 2:02-cv-04257-RBS Document 6 Filed 09/11/2002 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Dmitry Beinus, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Shoe Pavilion, Inc. for the period ended July 3, 2004; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us by others within that entity, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of July 3, 2004, based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: August 16, 2004
EXHIBIT 32.1

SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, the undersigned officer of GMX Resources Inc. (the Company), hereby certifies that the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                     |  |  |  |                                              
|-------------------- |  |  |  | ---------------------------------------------
|Date: March 16, 2010 |  |  |  | /s/ Ken L. Kenworthy, Jr.                    
|                     |  |  |  | Ken L. Kenworthy, Jr. Chief
Executive Officer
NOT FOR PUBLICATION (Doc, No. 64)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

CHARLES WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff, : Civil No. 04-831 (RBK)
¥. : ORDER
TEMPLE UNIVERSITY, TEMPLE :
UNIVERSITY BOARD OF TRUSTEES,
TEMPLE UNIVERSITY POLICE
DEPARTMENT, et al.,

Defendants.

This matter comes before the Court upon the motion by Defendants Temple University,
Temple University Board of Trustees, Temple University Police Department (collectively “the
Temple Defendants”) for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56;
and the Court having considered the moving papers and the opposition thereto; and for the
reasons expressed in the Opinion issued this date;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants’ motion for summary judgment as to
Plaintiff's Fourth Amendment false arrest and false imprisonment claims are DENIED; and it is
further

ORDERED that Defendants’ motion for summary judgment as to Plaintiff's Eighth
Amendment and Twenty-Sixth Amendment claims are GRANTED; and it is further

ORDERED that Defendants’ motion for summary judgment as to Plaintiff's claims
against the Temple Defendants are GRANTED; and it is further

ORDERED that Defendants’ motion for summary judgment as to all of Plaintiff's claims


under Pennsylvania tort and criminal law are GRANTED; and it is further
ORDERED that Plaintiff's “illegal search and seizure in violation of the Fourth
Amendment to the United States Constitution,” (Compl. at 1), claim is GRANTED to the extent

that it is based upon the theory that Officer Szeles’s investigatory stop was unlawful.

Date:_6/20/2011

/s/ Robert B. Kugler _
ROBERT B. KUGLER
United States District Judge
EXHIBIT 23.2

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS

May 11, 2009

GMX Resources Inc.

One Benham Place, Suite 600

9400 North Broadway

Oklahoma City, OK 73114

Re: Consent of Independent Petroleum Engineers

To whom it may concern:

MHA Petroleum Consultants hereby consents to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No. 333-106311, 333-150356 and
333-151916) on Form S-8 of GMX Resources Inc. and registration statements (333-134911 and 333-149170, 333-150359 and 333-150368) on Form S-3 of the references to our report relating to the proved oil and natural gas reserves of GMX Resources Inc.
for the year ended December 31, 2008, and to the reference to our firm as experts in such registration statements with respect to such report.

Very
truly yours,



|                                |  |                                   
|------------------------------- |  | ----------------------------------
|MHA PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS, INC.
|                                | 
|By:                             |  | /s/ John Arsenault, Vice President
|                                |  | John Arsenault, Vice President
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS CONTAINED IN THE BODY OF THE ACCOMPANYING FORM 10-Q AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<CASH>                                          18,022
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   32,225
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     10,558
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                62,995
<PP&E>                                         142,624
<DEPRECIATION>                                  71,275
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 158,432
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           13,378
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        90,901
<OTHER-SE>                                           0
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   158,432
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    535
<INCOME-TAX>                                       174
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                361
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       361
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.16<F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.16<F1>
<FN>
<F1>(NOT ROUNDED TO THOUSANDS) 
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
# C_2015118EN.01003901.xml

| 13.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/39

---

Action brought on 17 February 2015 — Aston Martin Lagonda v OHIM (Representation of a grille positioned on the front of a motor vehicle)

(Case T-73/15)

(2015/C 118/49)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Aston Martin Lagonda Ltd (Gaydon, United Kingdom) (represented by: D. Farnsworth, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Trade mark at issue: Community mark indicated as ‘other’ (Representation of a grille positioned on the front of a motor vehicle) — Application for registration No 1 2 2 18  426

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 December 2014 in Case R 1796/2014-2

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision insofar as it upheld the conclusion of the examiner that the mark applied for prima facie lacked distinctive character for the goods and services in question; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision insofar as it upheld the conclusion of the examiner that the mark applied for prima facie lacked distinctive character for the goods and services in question;

prima facie

| — | allow the community trade mark application No 1 2 2 18  426 to proceed to publication; |
| --- | --- |

—

allow the community trade mark application No 1 2 2 18  426 to proceed to publication;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---