alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(rev. October 12, 2016)

AGENCY

FEEDBACK

Repositories

What is available for 

Debt Management 

Services (DMS) users

through FIR?

Information is provided through various 

tools on the FIR Portal, including:

- Interactive Treasury Offset Program 

(TOP)

- Treasury Report on Receivables 

(TROR) dashboards

- Aggregated and detailed data allowing 

for detailed analysis

- Data viewable by reporting periods

How does FIR use 

agency feedback?

Multiple factors contribute to the 

development and enhancements to the 

FIR, the most important and influential 

being agency feedback.

Agency feedback is used to drive the 

following:

- Portal enhancements

- Future data prioritization

- Onboarding process improvements

What is the FIR?

The Financial Information Repository 

(FIR) is the U.S. Department of the 

Treasury’s initiative to provide 

usable, easy-to-understand 

summarized, aggregated, and 

detailed information about the 

billions of financial transactions 

processed by the Treasury each 

year.

Through Fiscal Service, the FIR 

supports transparency and 

accountability and promotes 

operational efficiency by providing 

secure access to the following data:

- Debt Management

- Payments

- Collections

- Accounting

Fiscal Service’s mission is to 

promote the financial integrity and 

operational efficiency of the federal 

government through exceptional 

accounting, financing, collections, 

payments, and shared services. The 

bureau's vision is to help transform 

financial management and the 

delivery of shared services in the 

federal government.

What are the 

benefits?

Integrate — provides a single, 

integrated system to query data and 

view reports

Analyze — robust and intuitive web 

front-end for analyzing data trends 

and patterns

Enhance — provides insight into 

financial data for improved agency 

decision making

FACT SHEET - Financial Information Repository (FIR)

How can agencies 

get involved?

As repositories become integrated with 

the FIR, we identify possible users and 

begin the outreach/ onboarding 

process with agency contacts.

The FIR Outreach Team will continue 

to seek user feedback to identify and 

address future business intelligence, 

reporting, and analytics needs of 

agencies.

ABOUT FISCAL SERVICE 

AND DMS

The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s 

Bureau of the Fiscal Service assists federal 

agencies with the prevention, collection and 

resolution of debts owed to government 

agencies. Additionally, we provide debt 

collection services to the states. Debt 

Management Services (DMS) is the business 

area responsible for administering programs 

and services related to improper payments, 

receivables management and delinquent debt 

collection.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7744

LARRY A. LOVE,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; HENRY DARGAN

MCMASTER,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Greenville. Sol Blatt, Jr., Senior District

Judge. (CA-04-23066)

Submitted: May 19, 2006 Decided: June 12, 2006

Before MICHAEL, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Larry A. Love, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy

Attorney General, Jeffrey Alan Jacobs, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY

GENERAL, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Larry A. Love seeks to appeal the district court’s order

adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing

his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000). An appeal may

not be taken from the final order in a § 2254 proceeding unless a

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will

not issue for claims addressed by a district court absent “a

substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28

U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by

demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district

court’s assessment of his constitutional claims is debatable or

wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district

court is likewise debatable. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S.

322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000);

Rose v. Lee, 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have

independently reviewed the record and conclude that Love has not

made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of

appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ROBERT S. WALDMAN : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. :

:

TROOPER BRADFORD, et al. : NO. 02-4091

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 9 th day of January, 2003, upon consideration of the crossmotions for summary judgment, the replies, and after holding oral argument, IT IS HEREBY

ORDERED the Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED and the Plaintiff’s

Motion is DENIED. The Defendants are entitled to sovereign immunity on the state law claims

and we find that the Defendants are entitled to qualified immunity for the constitutional

violations alleged in the complaint. Therefore, JUDGMENT IS ENTERED IN FAVOR OF THE

DEFENDANTS ON ALL COUNTS. 

BY THE COURT:

 

JACOB P. HART

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Case 2:02-cv-04091-MK Document 15 Filed 01/09/2003 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ALMETER JONES O/B/O S,

Plaintiff,

v.

JO ANNE B. BARNHART

Defendant

Civil Action 

No. 04-1885

ORDER

AND NOW, this _______ day of September, 2005, after careful review and independent

consideration of the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment, Plaintiff’s reply brief, the

administrative record and upon review of the Report and Recommendation of Carol Sandra

Moore Wells, United States Magistrate Judge, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

2. The Commissioner’s Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED;

3. The Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED in part and

DENIED in part; and

4. The matter is REMANDED to the Commissioner of the Social Security

Administration, so that the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) can conduct

additional proceedings consistent with the Report and Recommendation.

Specifically, upon remand the ALJ should (a) proceed with counsel, if Plaintiff so

desires; (b) allow Plaintiff to incorporate new and material evidence of S’s

medical impairments into the administrative record to include all medical, school,

and family documentation; and (c) re-evaluate the disability status of S’s

medically documented impairments, including ODD, and render a new decision in

consideration of his combination of impairments. 

It is so ORDERED.

____________________________________

Pollak, J.

Case 2:04-cv-01885-LP Document 13 Filed 09/28/05 Page 1 of 1
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 771 

Honoring and recognizing the 40th anniversary of Cheyney University’s historic, momentous, and epic 1978 NCAA Division II Basketball Championship win. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MARCH 13, 2018 

Mr. EVANS (for himself and Mr. BRADY of Pennsylvania) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Education and 

the Workforce 

RESOLUTION 

Honoring and recognizing the 40th anniversary of Cheyney 

University’s historic, momentous, and epic 1978 NCAA 

Division II Basketball Championship win. 

Whereas, since it was founded in 1837, Cheyney University 

has been a true treasure in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania; 

Whereas the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania is the proud 

home of Cheyney University, the Nation’s first historically Black college and university (HBCU); 

Whereas, on March 18, 2018, Cheyney University will celebrate the 40th anniversary of its notable NCAA Division 

II Basketball Championship win; 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 771 IH 

Whereas the Cheyney State College Wolves basketball team 

made history in 1978 when they defeated the team from 

the University of Wisconsin-Green Bay with a score of 

47–40 in Springfield, Missouri, bringing home the 

school’s first national championship victory; 

Whereas just as the victorious 2018 Super Bowl Champions 

Philadelphia Eagles defied all the odds to prove that underdogs can and will be victorious, so too did the number4-ranked Cheyney State College Wolves by defeating the 

number-1-ranked University of Wisconsin-Green Bay 

team in the 1978 NCAA Division II Basketball Championship game; 

Whereas Coach John Chaney was the NCAA Division II 

Coach of the Year; and 

Whereas we extend congratulations to the entire 1978 

Cheyney Wolves team, which included John Butts, Duane 

Coleman, All-American Milt Colston, Tournament MVP 

Andrew Fields, Kenny Hinson, Jeffrey Hutcherson, 

Roger Leysath, Gerald Mills, Charles Murphy, Gilbert 

Saunders, Arthur Stone, and John Walter—under the 

leadership of legendary Naismith Hall of Fame Coach 

John Chaney: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives proudly 

2 celebrates and recognizes Cheyney University on the 40th 

3 anniversary of their historic 1978 NCAA Division II 

4 championship win. 

Æ 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
No. 55817.

protests 550551-G, etc. (Baltimore).

#### M. S. Levy & Sons, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

The protests were dismissed.
EXHIBIT 31.2

ANNUAL OFFICERS CERTIFICATE

WORLD OMNI FINANCIAL CORP.

The undersigned, duly authorized representative of World Omni Financial Corp., as Servicer, pursuant to Section 4.10 of the Sale and Servicing
Agreement, dated as of August 25, 2005, among World Omni Auto Receivables Trust 2005-B, as Issuer, World Omni Auto Receivables LLC, as Seller and World Omni Financial Corp., as Servicer (the Series 2005-B Sale and Servicing
Agreement), does hereby certify that a review of the activities of the Servicer during the period from January 1, 2005 through December 31, 2005, has been made under my supervision with a view to determining whether during such
period the Servicer has performed and observed all of its obligations under the Series 2005-B Sale and Servicing Agreement. To the best of my knowledge, no default by the Servicer under the Series 2005-B Sale and Servicing Agreement has occurred and
is continuing. Capitalized terms used but not defined herein are used as defined in the Series 2005-B Sale and Servicing Agreement.

IN
WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Certificate this 29th day of March, 2006.



By:

/s/ Victor A. De JesusName:

Victor A. De JesusTitle:

Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
of World Omni Financial Corp., as Servicer on behalf of the
Trust
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.7

                                      NOTE

$8,000,000.00                                                     April 30, 2002

         FOR VALUE RECEIVED, JERRY C. MOYES, an individual residing in Arizona
(the "Maker") promises to pay to the order of CENTRAL FREIGHT LINES, INC., a
Texas corporation (the "Holder"), the principal sum of EIGHT MILLION and No/100
DOLLARS ($8,000,000.00), payable on October 30, 2003, together wigh interest
from the date hereof on the unpaid principal balance at a per annum rate equal
to LIBOR plus 225 basis points. "LIBOR" shall mean the rate per annum for
deposits for a period equal to three months appearing on that page of the
Bloomberg's Service that displays British Banker's Association Interest
Settlement Rates for deposits in dollars as of 11:00 a.m. (London, England time)
on the day that is two business days prior to the date first above written. Both
principal and interest are payable in lawful money of the United States of
America to the Holder at its headquarters in Waco, Texas, or any such location
designated by the Holder, in same day funds.

         The Maker may, at any time and from time to time, prepay this Note in
whole or in part, without penalty. All payments received hereunder shall be
first applied to interest due and the balance, if any, to principal.

         Should it become necessary in the opinion of the Holder to collect or
enforce this Note, the Maker agrees to pay all costs, charges, and
disbursements, including, without limitation, attorneys' fees and court costs,
incurred by the Holder in collecting or enforcing the payment of this Note. The
Maker waives presentment for payment, demand, protest and notice of demand, and
protest and nonpayment.

         This Note shall be governed by, interpreted, and enforced in accordance
with the laws of the State of Texas, excluding its principles of conflict of
law.

         IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Note has been executed on the date and year
first above written.

                                                 JERRY C. MOYES

                                                 /s/ Jerry Moyes
                                                 -------------------------------
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

GENERAL REFRACTORIES COMPANY : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. :

:

FIRST STATE INSURANCE CO., et al. : No. 04-3509

ORDER

AND NOW, this 26th day of March, 2012,“Defendants’ Motion for Summary

Judgment Based on Plaintiff’s Lack of Damages” (doc. no. 346 (sealed)) is denied.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Edmund V. Ludwig

Edmund V. Ludwig, J.

Case 2:04-cv-03509-EL Document 433 Filed 03/27/12 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906

OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of J.Crew Group, Inc. and (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 28,
2006 (the Report), we, Millard S. Drexler, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, and James S. Scully, Executive Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of each of our knowledge:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Dated: December 12, 2006



|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Millard S. Drexler                                              
|Millard S. Drexler Chairman of the Board and Chief
Executive Officer
|                                                                    
|/s/ James S. Scully                                                 
|James S. Scully Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350) and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document.

A signed original of this written
statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 216 (Thursday, November 9, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 77374]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-24725]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 9, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 2, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] Contract 
90 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, 
Docket Nos. MC2024-34, CP2024-34.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2023-24725 Filed 11-8-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
#### WOLYNSKI v. UNITED STATES et al.

Civil Action No. 2186.

United States District Court D. Connecticut.

July 29, 1948.

Aaron J. Palmer, of Middletown, Conn., for plaintiff.

Adrian W. Maher, Esq., U. S. Atty., of New Haven, Conn., and Edward J. Lonergan, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Hartford, Conn., for defendant.

John D. Thomas, of Waterbury, Conn., for third-party defendant.

SMITH, District Judge.

This is an action by the sister of a deceased insured under the National Service Life Insurance Act of 1940, 38 U.S.C. A. § 801 et seq., for a declaratory judgment that the insurance is payable to the father as the primary beneficiary and plaintiff, her brother and sisters, contingent remainder-men under the policy.

One Alice Martin, held by the Veterans’ Administration to be entitled to the proceeds of the policy as a person in loco parentis, and designated beneficiary, has been *79impleaded as third-party defendant, moves to dismiss on the ground that the Complaint does not state a claim on which relief can be granted, contending that plaintiff is not a real party in interest and, therefore, is not a proper party-plaintiff. She

It would appear that plaintiff, as a contingent remainderman, is a real party in interest.

If she prevails in this action, she will receive the balance of the 120 payments not received by her father, provided he dies before their completion and she is alive upon his death. She is also vitally interested in the life expectancy of the person possessing the first life interest because the payments here only extend for a term of years after the death of the insured. These are the rights which cannot be altered by anyone but Congress. As between persons other than the United States they could well be called vested although because of the provisions of 38 U.S.C.A. § 802 (i), they cannot be considered rights which vest as against the United States. Be that as it may, no matter what name is given to the plaintiff’s rights, they appear to be sufficient to permit suit by her.

In order that there be a complete determination of this litigation, the father of the plaintiff and all potential beneficiaries under the statute and by way of deceased’s designation of beneficiaries should be brought into this litigation as parties.

The motion to dismiss is denied.

Form of order citing-in additional parties may be submitted by counsel for the plaintiff.
### NUMBER 13
- 1 3
- 00 561
- CV


## COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI
- EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________

I N THE INTEREST OF V. E. M., A CHILD

____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 206 th District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



## MEMORANDUM OPINION

Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Perkes Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant, Brandon Mahan, filed an appeal from a judgment entered by the 206 th
District Court of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number F

- 2877

- 04

- D . Appellant ha s
filed a motion to dismiss the appeal. Appellant request s that this Court withdraw the notice of appeal and dismiss the appeal. The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant ’ s motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.1(a). Appellant ’ s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby2

DISMISSED. Costs will be taxed against appellant. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 42.1(d) ("Absent agreement of the parties, the court will tax costs against the appellant."). Having d ismissed the appeal at appellant ’ s request, no motion for rehearing will be
entertained, and our mandate will issue forthwith.

PER CURIAM

De livered and filed the 1 3 th day of February , 20 1 4

.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[S. 1138 Introduced in Senate (IS)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                S. 1138

    To rescind $500,000 a week from the Office of the Secretary of 
  Education until the Secretary of Education reconsiders Upward Bound 
  applications that were rejected due to arbitrary formatting issues.

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                              May 16, 2017

  Mr. Tester introduced the following bill; which was read twice and 
  referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
    To rescind $500,000 a week from the Office of the Secretary of 
  Education until the Secretary of Education reconsiders Upward Bound 
  applications that were rejected due to arbitrary formatting issues.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

    This Act may be cited as the ``Department of Education 
Accountability Act''.

SEC. 2. RESCISSION OF FUNDS.

    (a) Requiring Review of All Upward Bound Applications.--
Notwithstanding any other provision of law or any policy of the 
Department of Education, the Secretary of Education shall consider all 
applications that were submitted for a grant under section 402C of the 
Higher Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 1070a-13), for the grant 
competition under such section for fiscal year 2017, without regard as 
to whether the application satisfied any formatting requirements, 
including font type or size, line spacing, or margins.
    (b) Compliance.--As soon as the Secretary of Education has ensured 
that the Department of Education has complied with subsection (a), the 
Secretary shall prepare and submit a certification of such compliance 
to Congress and to the Secretary of the Treasury.
    (c) Rescission.--
            (1) In general.--Subject to paragraph (2), effective on the 
        date that is 7 days after the date of enactment of this Act, 
        and every 7 days thereafter, there are rescinded from the 
        unobligated balances made available for the Office of the 
        Secretary of Education, $500,000.
            (2) Compliance.--Paragraph (1) shall cease to have force or 
        effect on the date on which the Secretary of Education submits 
        the certification required under subsection (b).
            (3) Use of funds.--Any amounts rescinded under paragraph 
        (1) shall be returned to the Treasury and used for deficit 
        reduction.
                                 <all>
```