alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
2020 State of the Markets Report

03/18/2021 1
Key Findings

• COVID-19 shaped energy market fundamentals

• Wholesale electricity prices reached record lows in some regions

• Mostly solar, wind, and natural gas capacity additions

• Electricity markets expanded and were refined

• Reliability needs drove a large share of new transmission projects

• Natural gas prices were low across the country

• LNG exports pushed net exports to a new record in the second-half 

03/18/2021 2
COVID-19 and U.S. Energy Markets

• In April, electricity demand in U.S. Independent System Operators 

(ISOs) contracted between 4% and 10%

• New demand patterns emerged, requiring new demand forecasts

• Grid operators modified protocols to reduce the spread of COVID-19 

to critical personnel and ensure continuity of operations

• Natural gas production associated with crude oil was expected to 

fall because of large drops in demand of oil products, but total 

natural gas production fell only 2%

03/18/2021 3
Low Electricity Prices

03/18/2021 4

Fig. 1 - Change in Annual Average Day-Ahead 

On-Peak Price from 2019 for Select Hubs

Fig. 2 - Annual Average Day-Ahead On-Peak Price at ISO and 

Non-ISO Pricing Nodes in 2020

Source: S&P Global Market Intelligence Source: Hitachi Powergrids Velocity Suite
Changes in Installed Generation Capacity

03/18/2021 5

Fig. 3 - Capacity Additions and Retirements, 2020 

Source: EIA-860M
Generation Fuel Mix

03/18/2021 6

Fig. 4 – Generation Fuel Mix of U.S. Balancing Authorities, 2020 

Source: EIA-930 and CAISO
Expansion and Refinement of Electricity 

Markets

• Expansion of Electricity Markets in the West

• Two utilities joined CAISO-run Western Energy Imbalance Market 

• Commission approved SPP-administered Western Energy 

Imbalance Service

• Expansion and Refinement of Electricity Market Products

• New ramping product in SPP

• Fast-start pricing in PJM and SPP

• Reserve markets in PJM and MISO

03/18/2021 7
New Line-Related Transmission Projects

8

Fig. 5 – Transmission Projects With 2020 in Service Dates Within 

Order No. 1000 Planning Regions

Source: The Three C Group, LLC

03/18/2021
Lower Natural Gas Prices Across the U.S.

03/18/2021 9

Fig. 6 – Average 2020 Platts Gas Daily Index Prices at Major Hubs

Note: Region color is based on average price at nearest Staff-selected major hubs and may not exactly 

represent local delivered prices. Source: S&P Platts Gas Daily; Hitachi Powergrids Velocity Suite
Resilient Production Despite Lower 

Drilling Rig Count

03/18/2021 10

Fig. 7 – U.S. Dry Natural Gas Production

Source: Energy Information Administration
Record Net Exports on LNG Growth

03/18/2021 11

Fig. 8 – U.S. Natural Gas Trade and Net Exports

Source: Energy Information Administration
Other Topics Discussed in the Report

03/18/2021 12

• Severe Weather Events

• Heatwaves and Wildfires in the West

• Hurricanes in the Gulf of Mexico

• Natural Gas Fundamentals

• Demand and Power Burn

• Storage Inventories

• Electricity Fundamentals

• Electricity Demand

• Capacity Markets
2020 State of the Markets Report

market.assessments@ferc.gov

03/18/2021 13
August 9, 1962

Reap. Dec. 10317.

#### Polytrade, Inc. *v.*United States,

rehearing motion granted

Entered at New York, N.Y. (Not published.) Motion by plaintiff.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

      ( print page 77597)    
Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The grant applications and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Special Emphasis Panel; R13 Review.                    

*Date:*                         November 27-28, 2023.                    

*Time:*                         10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate grant applications.                    

*Place:*                         National Institutes of Health, Neuroscience Center, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Rockville, MD 20852 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Li Jia, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Activities, NINDS/NIH/DHHS, 6001 Executive Boulevard, Room 3208D, Rockville, MD 20852, 301-451-2854,                         *li.jia@nih.gov.*

This notice is being published less than 15 days prior to the meeting due to the timing limitations imposed by the review and funding cycle.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.853, Clinical Research Related to Neurological Disorders; 93.854, Biological Basis Research in the Neurosciences, National Institutes of Health, HHS.)

Dated: November 7, 2023.

David W. Freeman, 

Supervisory Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-24961 Filed 11-9-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR

. R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit



## FILED

March 25, 2004

Charles R. Fulbruge III

Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-40706 c/w

03-40707

Summary Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

PEDRO DAMIAN MARTINEZ-CARRILLO,

also known as Pedro Martinez-Carrillo,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Texas

USDC No. L-99-—4411

--------------------

Before BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM: *

Pedro Damian Martinez-Carrillo (Martinez), represented by the

Federal Public Defender (FPD), seeks to a ppeal two judgments

revoking probation imposed following two prior guilty-plea

convictions for illegally entering the United States. The FPD did

not file a timely notice of appeal, nor seek a timely extension of

the time for filing a notice of appeal. S ee F ED

. R. A PP

. P. 4(b)(1)

& (4). Instead, five months after the revocation, the FPD filed aNo. 03-40706 c/w

03-40707

-2-

motion for the “judicial remedy” of an out-of-time appeal. The

district court granted the motion.

“[A] district court does not have the authority to create

appellate juri sdiction simply by ordering an out-of-time direct

criminal appeal. Compliance with the Federal Rules of Appellate

Procedure is imperative.” U nited States v. West

, 240 F.3d 456, 459

(5th Cir. 2001). West did not create a new remedy, but addressed

only the proper procedures for granting an out-of-time appeal

pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. I d. at 459-61 (“Since the 1960s, our

court, pursuant to a § 2255 motion, has permitted an out-of-time

appeal when a defendant was denied assistance of counsel on appeal,

through co unsel’s failure to perfect an appeal.”) (citations

omitted).

We VACATE the dis trict court’s order granting the “judicial

remedy” of an out- of-time appeal, and we REMAND the case. The

district court should determine, in l ight of C astro v. United

States

,

__ U.S.

__, 124 S. Ct. 786, 792 (2003), whether it will

construe the motion for “judicial remedy” as a 28 U.S.C. § 2255

motion and, if so, whether Martinez received ineffective assistance

of appellate counsel. If the district court construes the motion

as a § 2255 motion and finds ineffective assistance, then the

constructive § 2255 motion should be dismissed wit hout prejudice

and the judgment reentered. The district court may accept any

pleadings or conduct any hearings necessary for complia nce with

this order.No. 03-40706 c/w

03-40707

-3-

ORDER VACATED; CASE REMANDED.
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATIONPURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

The undersigned, RobertK. Weiler, Chief Executive Officer of Phase Forward Incorporated (the “Company”),in connection with the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for theperiod ended March 31, 2008 (the “Report”), as filed with the Securitiesand Exchange Commission on the date hereof, hereby certifies pursuant to therequirements of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that

 

·                  theReport fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and

 

·                   theinformation in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

This certification isbeing provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 and is not to be deemed a part of theReport, nor is it to be deemed to be “filed” for any purpose whatsoever.

 

 
|   |   | By:    |   | /s/ ROBERT K. WEILER                                                                     |
|--------|--------|--------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |   |   |   | Robert K. Weiler  Chief Executive Officer  Phase Forward Incorporated  May 12, 2008 |

 

1

----
Exhibit 99.1

              CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report of Blue Industries, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Patrick Gouverneur, the principal executive officer of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of the Company.

           /s/ Patrick Gouverneur
Patrick Gouverneur, Chief Executive Officer
May 8, 2003



<PAGE>
No. 59963.

#### Standard International Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 202152-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of steel in strips the same in all material respects as that the subject of Abstract 58580, the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (1) The items marked “A” at 12)4 percent under the provision in paragraph 316 (a) (19 U. S. C. § 1001, par. 316 (a)), as modified by the Annecy Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 52373), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T. D. 52462), for steel in strips thicker than five one-hundredths of 1 inch, and (2) the items marked “B” at 10 percent under the provision in said paragraph, as modified, *supra,*for steel in strips thicker than one one-hundredths and not thicker than five one-hundredths of 1 inch.
FISCAL YEAR REPORTING PERIOD ALLOCATION TRANSFER AGENCY IDENTIFIER AGENCY IDENTIFIER BEGINNING PERIOD OF AVAILABILITY ENDING PERIOD OF AVAILABILITY AVAILABILITY TYPE CODE AGENCY MAIN ACCOUNT 

2021 12 75 F 387

2021 12 10 X 10

2021 12 29 X 10

2021 12 34 X 10

2021 12 50 X 102021 12 74 X 10

2021 12 417 X 10

2021 12 47 X 1

2021 12 31 X 20

2021 12 309 X 202021 12 418 X 20

2021 12 89 X 2

2021 12 33 X 30

2021 12 70 X 562021 12 70 X 60

2021 12 70 X 80

2021 12 70 X 90

2021 12 11 X 100

2021 12 524 X 275

2021 12 292 X 297

2021 12 18 X 4022021 12 25 X 405

2021 12 455 X 41

2021 12 352 X 413

2021 12 16 X 420

2021 12 512 X 433

2021 12 4 X 4502021 12 14 X 4522021 12 15 X 452

2021 12 47 X 454

2021 12 89 X 456

2021 12 51 X 459

2021 12 16 X 460

2021 12 362 X 5022021 12 519 X 536

2021 12 537 X 5532021 12 581 X 557

2021 12 19 X 57

2021 12 56 X 6142021 12 26 X 615

2021 12 17 X 627

2021 12 571 X 675

2021 12 12 2017 2017 12

2021 12 0 2017 2017 40

2021 12 49 2019 2019 182021 12 33 2019 2020 20

2021 12 13 2019 2020 145

2021 12 0 2020 2020 102021 12 1 2020 2020 10

2021 12 24 2020 2020 10

2021 12 27 2020 2020 10

2021 12 45 2020 2020 102021 12 61 2020 2020 10

2021 12 62 2020 2020 10

2021 12 65 2020 2020 10

2021 12 73 2020 2020 102021 12 83 2020 2020 10

2021 12 93 2020 2020 10

2021 12 420 2020 2020 10

2021 12 3 2020 2020 10

2021 12 5 2020 2020 102021 12 11 2020 2020 1

2021 12 13 2020 2020 12
2021 12 36 2020 2020 14

2021 12 70 2020 2020 202021 12 514 2020 2020 202021 12 70 2020 2020 30

2021 12 88 2020 2020 30

2021 12 472 2020 2020 30

2021 12 424 2020 2020 3

2021 12 70 2020 2020 402021 12 90 2020 2020 40

2021 12 2 2020 2020 472021 12 70 2020 2020 502021 12 70 2020 2020 53

2021 12 70 2020 2020 54

2021 12 70 2020 2020 6

2021 12 70 2020 2020 70

2021 12 91 2020 2020 80

2021 12 10 2020 2020 92

2021 12 72 2020 2020 100

2021 12 19 2020 2020 1062021 12 15 2020 2020 1102021 12 434 2020 2020 110

2021 12 17 2020 2020 145

2021 12 11 2020 2020 1452021 12 349 2020 2020 17

2021 12 511 2020 2020 173

2021 12 21 2020 2020 20

2021 12 432 2020 2020 210

2021 12 306 2020 2020 230

2021 12 485 2020 2020 272021 12 368 2020 2020 280

2021 12 57 2020 2020 340

2021 12 57 2020 2020 385

2021 12 510 2020 2020 385

2021 12 60 2020 2020 8232021 12 28 2020 2020 870

2021 12 11 2020 2021 10

2021 12 68 2020 2021 10

2021 12 80 2020 2021 122021 12 86 2020 2021 33

2021 12 70 2020 2021 55

2021 12 458 2020 2021 130

2021 12 302 2020 2021 1702021 12 11 2021 2021 3

2021 12 8 2021 2021 10

2021 12 54 2021 2021 10

2021 12 70 2021 2021 102021 12 84 2021 2021 10

2021 12 97 2021 2021 10

2021 12 20 2021 2021 10

2021 12 69 2021 2021 10

2021 12 11 2021 2021 2

2021 12 11 2021 2021 22021 12 11 2021 2021 30

2021 12 345 2021 2021 30

2021 12 11 2021 2021 402021 12 17 2021 2021 110

2021 12 339 2021 2021 140

2021 12 11 2021 2021 145

2021 12 360 2021 2021 160

2021 12 525 2021 2021 1652021 12 11 2021 2021 190

2021 12 21 2021 2021 20

2021 12 21 2021 2021 206

2021 12 11 2021 2021 260
2021 12 33 2021 2022 10

2021 12 242 2021 2022 2802021 12 77 2021 2023 448
#### Jones, Appellant, *v.*Continental Grocery Stores.

*Vendor*— Vendee—Sales *of stock*— Agency—Failure *to establish.*

In an action of assumpsit to recover money paid for alleged worthless stock sold under misrepresentations of the vendor, a judgment of nonsuit will be sustained, where the plaintiff has failed to establish that the persons who sold him the stock were the agents of the defendant company.

Argued April 25, 1924.

Appeal, No. 133, April T., 1924, by plaintiff, from Judgment of O. P. Allegheny Co., Oct. T., 1922, No. 1157, refusing to strike off judgment of nonsuit in the case of John D. Jones t. -Continental Grocery Stores of Pennsylvama, Inc., in hands of Pennsylvania Trust Company, receiver.

Before Henderson, Trexler, Keller, Linn and Gawthrop, JJ.

Affirmed.

Assumpsit to recover purchase price of stock. Before Macfarlane, J.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court.

The court entered judgment of compulsory nonsuit, which it subsequently refused to strike off. Plaintiff appealed.

*Error assigned*was the decree of the court.

*WilUam M. Hall,*and with him *Alexander E. Eunter,*for appellant.

*576
      *E. D. Montgomery,*and with him *Joseph E. Reich*and *Morris D. Canter,*for appellee.

July 2, 1924:

Opinion by

Linn, J.,

Plaintiff bought $1,900, par, of the capital stock of defendant corporation; rescinded the purchase, on the ground of false and fraudulent representations inducing it, and sued to get back his money. Though he testifies he was cheated, he was nonsuited for failure to prove that his vendor was defendant’s agent. We have examined the evidence most carefully and are driven to the same conclusion.

He bought $500 par of. Abelson May 22d, and $1,400 of Sander May 25th, these men gave him receipts for the purchase price on behalf of a vendor specified as the Continental Sales Company. On June 9th, by registered mail he returned the certificate for the $500 lot to the Continental Sales Company. He put in evidence an acknowledgment by that company, dated May 26th, of his subscription for the $1,400 lot, which stock, he testifies, he never received. He showed that defendant had sold $500,000 par of its common stock to Crager System Inc., to be delivered on demand, at prices fixed at the time of the original transaction, and that defendant understood Crager System Inc., would resell those shares to persons residing near defendant’s stores. It appears that stock certificates on plaintiff’s subscriptions were issued by defendant pursuant to demand by Crager System Inc. If, as he showed, there was a sale to Crager System Inc., that company and not defendant would be the vendor, — assuming for the present that the Continental Sales Company was shown to represent the Crager System Inc. The proof of agency failed. The transactions have a most suspicious appearance in the evidence, but essential links are missing. In. view of our conclusion on that branch of the case, we do not discuss the na- ■ ture of the fraudulent representation.

Judgment affirmed.
Case No. 13,028.

#### SMITH et ux. v. CLARKE.

[4 Cranch, C. C. 293.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

March Term, 1833.

Pleading at Law — Proof—Variance—Due-Bill Made-to Wife — Before Marriage— During Coverture.

A due-bill made to the wife during the cov-erture, and for a consideration accruing during the coverture, is not admissible evidence to support a declaration which avers that the due-bill was made dnm sola.

The declaration stated that the due-bill, ' which was made to the wife, was made to her dum sola. The due-bill offered in evidence was given to her after the marriage, and during the coverture, for a consideration accruing during the coverture.

The defendant objected to the evidence for the variance, and the objection was sustained by

THE COURT.

(THRUSTON, Circuit Judge, absent.)
J

- A33020

- 15

* Retired Senior Judge assigned to the Superior Court. NON

- PRECEDENTIAL DECISION

– SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37

MARK WEBB, AS ADMINISTRATOR FOR THE ESTATE OF SABINO WEBB,

DECEASED

Appellant

v.

VOLVO CARS OF NORTH AMERICA, LLC, VOLVO CARS CORPORATION, GRACO CHILDREN’S PRODUCTS, INC. (D/B/T/A NEWELL RUBBERMAID, INC.), WILLIAM JULIAN, AND ANA (WEBB) SOARES

Appellees :

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

: IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

No. 1367 EDA 2014

Appeal from the Judgment Entered March 26, 2014 In the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County

Civil Division at No: 110500208

BEFORE: FORD ELLIOTT, P.J.E., STABILE, and STRASSBURGER,* JJ.

CONCURRING MEMORANDUM BY STRASSBURGER, J.: FILED June 24, 2016

I agree with and join the Majority’s erudite disposition of this matter

holding that Appellant is entitled to a new trial based on the trial court’s

erroneous jury instruction. My joinder includes the Majori ty’s discussion of

Tincher v. Omega Flex, Inc. , 104 A.3d 328 (Pa. 2014). I write separately

to note my position that, in light of the Majority’s holding, it is unnecessary

and perhaps confusing to address the remaining issues on appeal. To say

that an ev identiary ruling is not an abuse of discretion does not preclude the

possibility that the opposite ruling also would not be an abuse of discretion.

Therefore, I respectfully concur.
No. 52509.

protests 942495-G, etc. (New York).

#### James E. Markham, Alien Property Custodian *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cole, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
No. 49045.

#### Protest 76713-K of American Mdse. Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *United States*v. *Heinrich Herrmann & Weiss*(26 C. C. P. A. 292, C. A. D. 30), which record was incorporated herein, the claim at 50 percent under paragraph 1506 was sustained as to certain of the merchandise.
Exhibit 32.1

Statement of Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code

 

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, I, Steven R. Williams, the Chief Executive Officer of Petroleum Development Corporation, Managing General Partner of the Registrant, hereby certify that: 

- I have reviewed the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;
- the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
- the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 

_/s/ Steven R. Williams                   

Steven R. Williams

Chief Executive Officer of the 

Managing General Partner of the Registrant

___March 25,  2004_________
No. 53459.

protests 147038-K (B), etc. (New York).

#### Albert Alfandari et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Exhibit 32.1

                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C.  Section 1350,  as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of  2002,  each of the  undersigned  officers  of  EcoSystem
Corporation (the "Company"), certifies that:

1.   The Annual Report on Form 10-K/A  (Amendment  No. 1) of the Company for the
     year  ended  December  31,  2004 (the  "Report")  fully  complies  with the
     requirements  of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange Act of
     1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

2.   The information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


                 /S/      GLEN COURTRIGHT
                 -----------------------------------
                          GLEN COURTRIGHT
                          Chief Executive Officer
Dated:                    May 20, 2009

                 /S/      JACQUELINE FLYNN
                 -----------------------------------
                          JACQUELINE FLYNN
                          Chief Financial Officer
Dated:                    May 20, 2009

This certification is made solely for the purpose of 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
subject to the knowledge standard contained therein, and not for any other
purpose.