alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

JOSHUA EPHRAIM JONES, Appellant,
vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent. No. 67976 

# FILED
APR 1 2016

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE This is an appeal from a judgment of conviction, pursuant to a jury verdict, of unemployment insurance fraud, conspiracy to unlawfully obtain or increase unemployment benefits, and obtaining money under false pretenses. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Carolyn Ellsworth, Judge.

Appellant Joshua Jones contends that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support the jury's finding of guilt for obtaining money under false pretenses. Jones contends that separate acts may not be aggregated under NRS 205.380 and that the State produced evidence of separate acts involving an aggregate amount that exceeded $650, but not of any individual act that exceeded $650. Our review of the record on appeal, however, reveals sufficient evidence to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt as determined by a rational trier of fact. 

### See Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319 (1979); 

### Origel-Candido v. State, 114 Nev. 378, 381,956 P.2d 1378, 1380 (1998).

The record shows that Jones discussed his unemployment benefits with his then-girlfriend by phone when he was incarcerated—and thus ineligible to receive unemployment benefits—and directed her to

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(01 1947A (41.40e" — 

## 6-3 J.
as

Cherry

Gibbofrs keep filing his unemployment-benefits claims. She then logged into the unemployment-benefits phone system using his social security number and PIN on a weekly basis and falsely certified his eligibility to continue receiving benefits, received nine weekly payments totaling $1440, and used Jones' unemployment-benefits debit card to access this money.

The jury could reasonably infer from the evidence presented that Jones counseled, encouraged, hired, commanded, induced, or otherwise procured another to obtain more than $650 by false pretenses. 

### See NRS 205.380(1). As Jones first raises his aggregation argument on appeal, we will not consider his claim that the individual payments may not be aggregated. 

### State v. Wade, 105 Nev. 206, 209 n.3, 772 P.2d 1291, 1293 n.3 (1989); 

### Merica v. State, 87 Nev. 457, 462, 488 P.2d 1161, 1163-64 (1971). We therefore

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.

cc: Hon. Carolyn Ellsworth, District Judge Attorney General/Carson City Clark County Public Defender Attorney General/Las Vegas Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT

OF NEVADA 2
(0) I947A
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

In connection with theQuarterly Report of J. Crew Group, Inc., J. Crew Intermediate LLC and J. CrewOperating Corp. (collectively, the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period endedMay 1, 2004 (the “Report”), Millard S. Drexler, Chairman of the Board and ChiefExecutive Officer of the Company, and Amanda J. Bokman, ExecutiveVice-President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of their knowledge:

 

1.                                       The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

2.                                       The information containedin the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financialcondition and results of operations of the Company.

 

 
| Dated: June  14, 2004                                  |
|--------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                   |
| /s/ Millard  S. Drexler                                |   |
| Millard S.  Drexler                                    |
| Chairman of  the Board and  Chief Executive Officer    |
|                                                   |
|                                                   |
| /s/ Amanda  J. Bokman                                  |   |
| Amanda J.  Bokman                                      |
| Executive  Vice-President and  Chief Financial Officer |

 

 

*A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 hasbeen provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnishedto the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.*

 

----
##### 



EXHIBIT 32.1
 CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
AND THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
UNITED STATES CODE)
  (a)
    
    the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
 (b)
    
    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:  February 26, 2008
    /s/ Mark M. JacobsMark M. JacobsPresident and
Chief Executive Officer/s/ Rick J. DobsonRick J. DobsonExecutive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
No. 50341.

#### Protests 909736-G, etc., of Winograd Bros., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It was stipulated that the goatskins are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Winograd Bros.*(32 C. C. P. A. 153, C. A. D. 302), which record was admitted in evidence herein. In accordance therewith the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.
----

|   | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and |
|--------|----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant as of and for the periods presented in the Report. |
|--------|----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|         | /s/ Lynda J. Nahra         |
|--------------|----------------------------|
|         |                       | Lynda J. Nahra |
|         |                       | President and Chief Executive Officer |
|         |                       |   |
|         | /s/ Charles G. Baltuskonis |
|         |                       | Charles G. Baltuskonis |
|         |                       | Executive Vice President and |
|         |                       | Chief Financial Officer |
| May 13, 2011 |                       |   |

----
- Bureau of the Fiscal Service
- Fiscal Service Data Registry
- Contact Us

# Contact Us

## Fiscal Service Data Architecture Contact

usaspending.help@fiscal.treasury.gov

Last modified 03/26/24
Back to Contents

**EXHIBIT 10.1**

 

----

Back to Contents

**SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance Group plc (the “Company”) on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Andrew Haste, Chief Executive  Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

|                       |                                      |
|----------------------------|-------------------------------------------|
| Date:        June 27, 2003 | /s/ Andrew Haste                          |
|                       |                                      |
|                       | Andrew Haste      Chief Executive Officer |

 

----
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JOHN BARBER and

BRENDA BARBER

:

:

: CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-CV-4220

Plaintiffs, :

:

v. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION;

BAYER AG;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE;

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM

:

:

:

:

:

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

:

Defendants. :

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of the Court:

Kindly enter the appearances of Hope S. Freiwald, Aline Fairweather, Erin

Brennan and Kirstin J. Miller as attorneys for defendant GlaxoSmithKline PLC.

Respectfully Submitted,

_____________________________ _____________________________

Hope S. Freiwald Aline Fairweather

_____________________________ _____________________________

Erin Brennan Kirstin J. Miller

DECHERT PRICE & RHOADS

4000 Bell Atlantic Tower

1717 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2793

(215) 994-4000

Case 2:02-cv-04220-JF Document 6 Filed 09/11/2002 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

DONALD and MARY EVERETT :

: CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-CV-4191

Plaintiffs, :

:

v. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION;

BAYER AG;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE;

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM

:

:

:

:

:

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

:

Defendants. :

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of the Court:

Kindly enter the appearances of Hope S. Freiwald, Aline Fairweather, Erin

Brennan and Kirstin J. Miller as attorneys for defendant SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a

GlaxoSmithKline.

Respectfully Submitted,

_____________________________ _____________________________

Hope S. Freiwald Aline Fairweather

_____________________________ _____________________________

Erin Brennan Kirstin J. Miller

DECHERT PRICE & RHOADS

4000 Bell Atlantic Tower

1717 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2793

(215) 994-4000

Case 2:02-cv-04191-HH Document 8 Filed 09/20/2002 Page 1 of 1
Federal Register / Vol. 64, No. 243 / Monday, December 20, 1999 / Proposed Rules 71233

DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

Fiscal Service

31 CFR Part 285

RIN 1510–AA78

Offset of Tax Refund Payments to

Collect State Income Tax Obligations

AGENCY: Financial Management Service,

Fiscal Service, Treasury.

ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking

by cross-reference to interim

regulations.

SUMMARY: In the rules and regulations

portion of this Federal Register, the

Financial Management Service is

issuing an interim rule setting forth the

rules governing the offset of Federal tax

refund payments to collect State income

tax obligations. The Internal Revenue

Service Restructuring and Reform Act of

1988 authorizes the Secretary of the

Treasury to reduce or offset Federal tax

refund payments to satisfy delinquent

State income tax obligations. The

interim rule also serves as the text of

this notice of proposed rulemaking.

DATES: Comments will be accepted until

January 19, 2000.

ADDRESSES: All comments should be

addressed to Gerry Isenberg, Financial

Program Specialist, Debt Management

Services, Financial Management

Service, Department of the Treasury,

401 14th Street S.W., Room 151,

Washington, D.C. 20227. A copy of this

interim rule is being made available for

downloading from the Financial

Management Service web site at the

following address: http://

www.fms.treas.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Dean Balamaci, Division Director, Debt

Management Services, at (202) 874–

6660; Ellen Neubauer or Ronda Kent,

Senior Attorneys, at (202) 874–6680.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The

interim rule in this issue of the Federal

Register establishes 31 CFR part 285.8.

For the text of the interim rule, see

Offset of Tax Refund payments to

collect State Income Tax Obligations,

Interim rule, published in the rules and

regulations section of this issue of the

Federal Register.

Regulatory Analyses

This proposed rule is not a significant

regulatory action as defined in

Executive Order 12866. It is hereby

certified that this proposed rule will not

have a significant economic impact on

a substantial number of small entities.

The basis for this certification is that

this proposed rule only impacts

individuals who owe delinquent income

tax debt to States and receive a Federal

tax refund payment. Therefore, a

regulatory flexibility analysis is not

required.

List of Subjects in 31 CFR Part 285

Administrative practice and

procedures, Claims, Debts, Privacy,

Taxes.

Richard L. Gregg,

Commissioner.

[FR Doc. 99–32680 Filed 12–17–99; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4810–35–P
854098.10.01 10/16/02 11:41 AM

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

DANIEL THOMPSON and :

LORETTO THOMPSON : CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-cv-4125

:

Plaintiffs, :

:

v. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION;

BAYER AG;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE;

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM

:

:

:

:

:

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

:

Defendants. :

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of the Court:

Kindly enter the appearances of Hope S. Freiwald, Aline Fairweather, Erin

Brennan and Kirstin J. Miller as attorneys for defendant SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a

GlaxoSmithKline.

Respectfully Submitted,

_____________________________ _____________________________

Hope S. Freiwald Aline Fairweather

_____________________________ _____________________________

Erin Brennan Kirstin J. Miller

DECHERT PRICE & RHOADS

4000 Bell Atlantic Tower

1717 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2793

(215) 994-4000

Case 2:02-cv-04125-JCJ Document 9 Filed 10/21/2002 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CRIMINAL ACTION 

v. NOS. 02-736 and 03-442 

TARELL STEW ART Consolidated 

ORDER 

AND NOW, this 291

h day of September 2015, upon consideration of Defendant's 

Motions under consolidated cases for a Reduction of Sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) and 

Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines (ECF Doc. Nos. 71 in 02-736 and 41 in 03-442) 

and the United States' Response (ECF Doc. Nos. 74 and 44), it is ORDERED Defendant's 

Motions are DENIED1

• 

1 A two (2) level base offense reduction under 18 U.S.C. 3582 (c)(2) and Amendment 782 

of the United States Sentencing Guidelines effective on November 1, 2014 is applied 

retroactively. Mr. Stewart is presently serving a term of imprisonment for violating the 

conditions of supervised release. This Court, through the Honorable William H. Yohn, revoked 

his supervised release and sentenced him to imprisonment for forty-six (46) months on January 

17, 2013 (ECF Doc. No. 70). Accordingly, Mr. Stewart continues to serve a term of 

imprisonment for violating supervised release. The Sentencing Guidelines specifically provide 

the reduction is not authorized for a term of imprisonment imposed upon a revocation of 

supervised release. U.S.S.G. § lBl.10 app. note 7(A) (note 5(A) prior to the 2014 amendments); 

see also United States v. Nelson, 410 F. App'x 734 (5th Cir. 2010); United States v. Forman, 553 

F.3d 585, 588-89 (7th Cir. 2009) (per curiam). 

Case 2:03-cr-00442-MAK Document 45 Filed 09/29/15 Page 1 of 1
No. 53433.

protests 139395-K, etc. (New York).

#### Gane & Ingram, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The protests were dismissed.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 87 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. J. RES. 87

    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
regarding regulations on the amounts of expenditures of personal funds 
           made by candidates for election for public office.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            February 8, 2000

Mr. Leach introduced the following joint resolution; which was referred 
                   to the Committee on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
    Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States 
regarding regulations on the amounts of expenditures of personal funds 
           made by candidates for election for public office.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled (two-thirds of each House 
concurring therein), That the following article is proposed as an 
amendment to the Constitution of the United States, which shall be 
valid to all intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when 
ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several States 
within seven years after the date of its submission for ratification:

                              ``Article --

    ``Section 1. Congress and the several States may enact laws 
regulating the amounts of expenditures a candidate for elective public 
office may make from personal funds of the candidate or members of the 
candidate's immediate family, including personal loans.''.
                                 <all>
```
## I N T H E C O U R T O F C R I M I N A L A P P E A L S O F T E X A S NO. WR-86,411-01
EX P ARTE BIL LY STE VEN NOWDEN, Applicant
ON AP P LICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORP US CAUSE NO. 24435 HC-1 IN THE 6TH DISTRICT COURT

F ROM LAMA R COUNTY
Per curiam . A L C A L A , J., fi led a concurring opin ion. O R D E R Pursuant to the provision s o f Ar t i cle 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedur e, the cler k of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habea s corpus. Ex parte Y o u n g , 418 S.W .2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of theft and sentenc ed to ten y ear s’ imprisonment. The Six th Court of Appea ls aff irmed his conviction. Nowden
v. St a t e , No. 06-16-00086- CR (Tex. App.—Texarkana Aug
. 26, 2016) (not designated for publication). Applicant contends, among other things, that he was incompetent at the guilt and revoc ation stag es of his ca se. Applicant has alleg ed fac ts that, if true, might entitle him to relief
. Ex parte Patterson , 9932

S.W .2d 114, 115 (Tex. Crim. App. 1999). In these circumstance s, additional fac ts are need ed
. As
we held in Ex parte Rodriguez , 334 S.W .2d 294, 294 (Tex. Crim. App. 1960), the trial court is the appropr iate forum for finding s of fac t. The trial court shall order g uilty -plea and revoc ation counsel t o respond to Applicant’s claim. The trial court may use any means set out in T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 11.07, § 3(d)
. I f t he trial court elects t o hold a hear ing, it shall deter mine whether Applicant is indige nt. I f Applicant is indige nt and wishes to be repr esente d by counsel, the trial court shall ap p o i nt an attorney to repre sent him at the hea ring . T E X . C O D E C R I M . P R O C . art. 26.04. The trial court shall make finding s of fac t and conclusions of law as to whether Applicant’s pleas we re involuntary

beca use he was i ncompetent at the guilt and revoc ation stag es of his ca se. The trial court shall also make any other finding s of fac t and conclusions o f l aw that it deems rele vant and a

ppropriate to the dispositi on of Applica nt’s claim for ha

beas c orpus re lief. This application will be held in abeyance until the trial court has resolved the fac t issues. The issues shall be resolv ed wi thin 90 day s of this order
. A supplemental transcr ipt containing all aff idavits and int err og atories or the t ransc ription of t he court repor ter’s notes from any hearing or deposition, along with the trial court’ s supplemental finding s of fa ct and c onclusions of law, shall be forwa rded to this Court within 120 day s of the date of this order
. Any extensions of time must be reque sted by

the trial cour

t and shall be obtaine d from this Court.
Filed: Apr il 26, 2017 Do not publish
No. 50299.

#### Protests 49376-K, etc., of American Cyanamid & Chemical Corp. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Exhibit No. 32.1
Form 10-KSB/A
Pegasus Wireless Corp.
File No. 000-32567



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection  with the Annual Report of Pegasus  Wireless Corp. (the "Company")
on Form 10-KSB for the year ended June 30, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange  Commission  on the date hereof  (the  "Report"),  I, Alex Tsao,  Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: September 20, 2005             By:  /s/Alex Tsao
                                    ----------------------------------------
                                          Alex Tsao
                                          Chief Executive Officer

--------------------------------------
This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and  shall not be deemed  filed by the  Company  for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906,  has been  provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.
COURT OF APPEALS

	SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

	FORT WORTH

	NO. 2-07-068-CV

NINETEEN EIGHTY-NINE, LLC	APPELLANT	

	V.

CARL C. ICAHN, CHELONIAN 	APPELLEES

SUBSIDIARY, LLC, ICAHN 

ASSOCIATES CORP., AND 

ICAHN & CO., INC.	

	----------

	FROM THE 348TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

	----------

	MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT

	----------

	We have considered  “Appellant's  Unopposed Motion To Dismiss Appeal.”  It is the court’s opinion that the motion should be granted; therefore, we dismiss the appeal.  See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), 43.2(f).

	Costs of the appeal shall be paid by the party incurring the same, for which let execution issue.  See Tex. R. App. P. 43.4.

								PER CURIAM

PANEL D:  LIVINGSTON, DAUPHINOT, and HOLMAN, JJ.  

DELIVERED:  April 5, 2007
No. 49074.

#### Protests 547883-G, etc., of Hyman Rosen et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

The testimony showed that certain of the items consist of hats similar to those involved in *Caradine*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 69, C. D. 664), the record in which case was admitted in evidence herein. In accordance therewith those imported or withdrawn for consumption prior to the Netherlands Trade Agreement (T. D. 48075) were held dutiable at 25 percent ad valorem under paragraph 1504 (b) (5), and those imported or withdrawn for consumption subsequent to said trade agreement were held dutiable at 12)4 percent under paragraph 1504 (b) (5) and T. D. 48075.