alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(rev. May 28, 2020)

What is AWG?

Administrative Wage Garnishment 

(AWG) is a delinquent debt 

collection process that allows a 

federal agency to order an employer 

to withhold up to 15 percent of an 

employee's disposable pay. The 

Cross-Servicing program conducts 

AWG on behalf of participating 

agencies.

Why AWG?

• An employed debtor refuses to 

pay or otherwise resolve a 

delinquent debt

• AWG can be started without a 

court order

• Effective collection tool

• Treasury rules require agency 

compliance (I TFM 4035.30)

How does AWG 

work?

• Once an agency authorizes AWG, 

all consumer and commercial 

debts with individual liability are 

eligible

• Each program profile must be 

updated

• For agencies in the CrossServicing program, Debt 

Management Services (DMS) 

mails an AWG Notice Letter to the 

debtor if the debtor's employer and 

social security number are 

identified

• DMS uses the National Directory 

of New Hires (NDNH) database to 

obtain accurate employment 

information

• For agencies in the CrossServicing program, DMS issues an 

AWG Order 30 days after the 

Notice Letter unless a timely 

hearing is filed OR a Payment 

Agreement established

Can a debtor 

request an AWG 

hearing?

• A debtor may request a hearing for 

various reasons (existence of 

debt, amount of debt, hardship)

• Hearings can be conducted 

internally within the agency

• A hearing official does not need to 

be an administrative law judge

• DMS will provide all the necessary 

information to assist with hearing 

procedures

• DMS offers hearing services for a 

fee

How can agencies 

implement AWG?

• Publish AWG regulations or 

publish that the agency is adopting 

Treasury’s AWG regulations

• Sign a Memorandum of 

Understanding and Interagency 

Agreement if DMS will be 

conducting hearings 

• Establish hearing procedures and 

appoint a hearing official (if 

conducting hearings internally)

• Identify all programs to participate 

in AWG

• Request that DMS update the 

Agency Profile/Program to “YES” 

for AWG

FACT SHEET

Administrative Wage Garnishment (AWG)

ABOUT FISCAL SERVICE 

AND DEBT MANAGEMENT 

SERVICES

The U.S. Department of the Treasury’s 

Bureau of the Fiscal Service assists federal 

agencies with the prevention, collection and 

resolution of debts owed to government 

agencies. Additionally, we provide debt 

collection services to the states. Debt 

Management Services (DMS) is the business 

area responsible for administering programs 

and services related to improper payments, 

receivables management and delinquent debt 

collection.

https://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/crossservicing/awg/awg-background.html
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

December 7, 2022

No. 04

- 22

- 00711

- CV

IN RE Julian CARRION , Relator

Original Proceeding 1

ORDER

In accordance with this court’s memorandum opinion of this date, relator’s unopposed motion to dismiss his petition for a writ of mandamus as moot is GRANTED. Relator’s petition

for a writ of mandamus is DISMISSED AS MOOT.

It is so ORDERED on December 7 , 2022

.

_____________________________ Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said

court on this 7th day of December, 2022

.

_____________________________ Michael A. Cruz

, Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. 2021

- CI

- 05288 , styled Carla Mulder v. Julian Carrion and Crestbrook Insurance Company d/b/a Nationwide Private Client , pending in the 438th Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas, the Honorable Angelica Jimenez presiding.
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 66-12 Filed 08/14/2009 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 66-12 Filed 08/14/2009 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 66-12 Filed 08/14/2009 Page 3 of 3
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with this annual filing of DNAPrint genomics, Inc., a Utah
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I,
Richard Gabriel, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.


/s/ Richard Gabriel
---------------------------------
Richard Gabriel
Chief Executive Officer/President

Date: March 11, 2005
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of the Interior

###### Bureau of Indian Affairs

          - [245A2100DD/AAKC001030/A0A501010.999900]

# AGENCY:

Bureau of Indian Affairs, Interior.

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

This notice announces the extension of the Class III gaming compact between the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe of North and South Dakota & State of South Dakota.

# DATES:

The extension takes effect on November 7, 2023.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Ms. Paula L. Hart, Director, Office of Indian Gaming, Office of the Assistant Secretary-Indian Affairs, Washington, DC 20240,                         *IndianGaming@bia.gov;*                         (202) 219-4066.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

An extension to an existing Tribal-State Class III gaming compact does not require approval by the Secretary if the extension does not modify any other terms of the compact. 25 CFR 293.5. The Standing Rock Sioux Tribe of North and South Dakota and the State of South Dakota have reached an agreement to extend the expiration date of their existing Tribal-State Class III gaming compact to February 19, 2024. This publication provides notice of the new expiration date of the compact.

Wizipan Garriott,

Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs, Exercising by delegation the authority of the Assistant Secretary—Indian Affairs.

[FR Doc. 2023-24604 Filed 11-6-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4337-15-P
August 29, 1951

No. 55844.

Suit 4655.

#### Balfour Guthrie & Co., Ltd., et al. *v.*United States.

C. D. 1232 affirmed May 8, 1951. C. A. D. 457.
Management's Assertion on Compliance with the Minimum Servicing
        Standards Set Forth in the Uniform Single Attestation Program for
                                Mortgage Bankers

                              Report of Management

We, as members of management of Midland Loan Services, Inc. (MLS), an indirectly
wholly-owned subsidiary of PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. (PNC), are
responsible for complying with the minimum servicing standards as set forth in
the Mortgage Bankers Association of America's Uniform Single Attestation Program
for Mortgage Bankers (USAP) except for commercial loan and multifamily
servicing, minimum servicing standards V.4 and VI.1, which the Mortgage Bankers
Association of America has interpreted as inapplicable to such servicing. We are
also responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal control
over compliance with these standards. We have performed an evaluation of MLS'
compliance with the minimum servicing standards as set forth in the USAP as of
December 31, 2000 and for the year then ended. Based on this evaluation, we
assert that during the year ended December 31, 2000, MLS complied, in all
material respects, with the minimum servicing standards set forth in the USAP.

As of and for this same period, PNC had in effect a fidelity bond in the amount
of $300,000,000 and an errors and omissions policy in the amount of $60,000,000.


Midland Loan Services, Inc.

/s/ Steven W. Smith

Steven W. Smith
Executive Vice President

January 31, 2001

                                       10
Order entered October 4, 2018

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 18
- 00567
- CV DARLENE C. AMRHEIN, Appellant

V.
ATTORNEY LENNIE F. B OLLINGER AND WORMINT ON & BOLLINGER LAW FIRM, Appellee s On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 6

Collin County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 006
- 02654
- 2017



### O RDER
Befo re the Court is appellant’s October 2, 2018 motion to proceed with brief for “good
cause reasons.” The motion follows t he trial court’s September 28, 2018 order sustaining the court reporter’s contest to appellant’s statement of inability to afford payment o f court costs. In the motion, appellant states she can file her brief by October 15, 2018

. We construe the motion as a statement that the reporter’s record will not be filed. Accordingly, we GRANT the motion and ORDER the appeal submitted without the reporter’s
record. Because the appellate rules afford appellant thirty days to file her brief, we ORDER the
brief be fi led no later than November 5, 2018. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P. 4.1(a), 38.6 (a).
/s/ DAVID EVANS JUSTICE
EXHIBIT 23.3  [Bond & Pecaro, Inc. letterhead]  November 5, 2009    VIA E-MAIL:  evanm@salem.cc  Mr. Evan D. Masyr Vice President of Accounting and Corporate Controller Salem Communications Corp. 4880 Santa Rosa Road #300 Camarillo, CA  93012  Dear Mr. Masyr:  Bond & Pecaro, Inc. hereby grants permission to Salem Communications Corp. to use the Bond & Pecaro, Inc. name and data from our work product as of September 30, 2009 in public filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.  I hope that this letter is responsive to your needs at this time.  Please do not hesitate to let us know if you need anything additional.   Sincerely,   /s/ Timothy S. Pecaro  Timothy S. Pecaro  cc. Jim Brown   1
No. 55124.

#### Herman Graef et al. *v.*United States,

protests 951819-G, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protests were dismissed.
**Exhibit 31.1**
CERTIFICATION
I, John S. Davis, certify that:
1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of EnergySouth, Inc. (the“Registrant”);
2.      Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterlyreport;
3.      Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of theRegistrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4.      The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inExchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and have:
   (a)     Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under oursupervision, to ensure that material information relating to theRegistrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made knownto us by others within those entities, particularly during theperiod in which this quarterly report is being prepared;    (b)     Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this quarterly report ourconclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterlyreport based on such evaluation; and    (c)     Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in theRegistrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurredduring the Registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect,the Registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;
5.      The Registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to theRegistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the Registrant’s board ofdirectors:
   (a)     All significant deficiencies in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and    (b)     Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management orother employees who have a significant role in the Registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting.   Date: August 3, 2004 /s/ John S. Davis   John S. Davis President and Chief Executive Officer
# C_2018005EN.01001201.xml

| 8.1.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 5/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.1.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 5/12

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 9 November 2017 — European Commission v Hellenic Republic

(Case C-481/16) (1)

1

((Failure of a Member State to fulfil obligations - State aid - Aid declared unlawful and incompatible with the internal market - Obligation to recover - Obligation to provide information - Non-implementation - Pleas in defence - Absolute impossibility of implementation))

(2018/C 005/15)

Language of the case: Greek

Parties

Parties

Applicant: European Commission (represented by: A. Bouchagiar and B. Stromsky, acting as Agents)

Applicant:

Defendant: Hellenic Republic (represented by: K. Boskovits and V. Karra, acting as Agents)

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Declares that, by failing to take within the prescribed period all the measures necessary to ensure implementation of Commission Decision 2014/539/EU of 27 March 2014 on State aid SA.34572 (13/C ex 13/NN) implemented by Greece for Larco General Mining & Metallurgical Company SA, and by failing to inform the European Commission of the measures taken pursuant to that decision, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 3 to 5 of that decision and the FEU Treaty; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Declares that, by failing to take within the prescribed period all the measures necessary to ensure implementation of Commission Decision 2014/539/EU of 27 March 2014 on State aid SA.34572 (13/C ex 13/NN) implemented by Greece for Larco General Mining & Metallurgical Company SA, and by failing to inform the European Commission of the measures taken pursuant to that decision, the Hellenic Republic has failed to fulfil its obligations under Articles 3 to 5 of that decision and the FEU Treaty;

| 2. | Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Hellenic Republic to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 383, 17.10.2016

1

---
{"agency":"FERC","generated":"2014-07-25 11:28:23","items":[{"id":"1","parent":null,"text":"Reporting Quarter","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-year","label":"Reporting Year","options":[{"label":"2011","value":"2011"},{"label":"2012","value":"2012"},{"label":"2013","value":"2013"},{"label":"2014","value":"2014"}],"value":"2014"},{"type":"select","name":"2-1-quarter","label":"Reporting Quarter","options":[{"label":"Q1","value":"Q1"},{"label":"Q2","value":"Q2"},{"label":"Q3","value":"Q3"},{"label":"Q4","value":"Q4"}],"value":"Q3"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-1","parent":"1","text":"Ten Oldest Requests","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-1-oldest","label":"Ten Oldest","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"10"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-3","parent":"1","text":"","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/10\/15","fields":[{"type":"select","name":"2-1-3-closed","label":"Ten Oldest Closed","options":[{"label":"0","value":"0"},{"label":"1","value":"1"},{"label":"2","value":"2"},{"label":"3","value":"3"},{"label":"4","value":"4"},{"label":"5","value":"5"},{"label":"6","value":"6"},{"label":"7","value":"7"},{"label":"8","value":"8"},{"label":"9","value":"9"},{"label":"10","value":"10"}],"value":"8"}],"multiple":false},{"id":"1-2","parent":"1","text":"FOIA Requests Information","due":null,"due_date":"2012\/08\/21","fields":[{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-component","label":"Component","options":[],"value":["FERC"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-received","label":"Received","options":[],"value":["33"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-processed","label":"Processed","options":[],"value":["30"]},{"type":"text","name":"2-1-2-backlog","label":"Backlog","options":[],"value":["10"]}],"multiple":true}],"year":"2014","quarter":"Q3"}
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 2010 - 0488 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 2008 - SW - 20 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. No 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, list latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch M anager**  **Date**
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Transportation

###### Federal Aviation Administration

          - 14 CFR Part 71
          - [Docket No. FAA-2022-1673; Airspace Docket No. 22-AGL-38]
          - RIN 2120-AA66

# AGENCY:

Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), DOT.

# ACTION:

Proposed rule; withdrawal.

# SUMMARY:

                        This action withdraws the notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) published in the                         **Federal Register**                         on December 22, 2022, proposing to establish Class E airspace at Paoli, IN. The FAA has determined that withdrawal of the NPRM is warranted as the airport has withdrawn its request to develop public instrument flight procedures necessitating the establishment of Class E airspace.                    

# DATES:

Effective as of 0901 UTC, November 9, 2023, the proposed rule published December 22, 2022 (87 FR 78616), is withdrawn.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Jeffrey Claypool, Federal Aviation Administration, Operations Support Group, Central Service Center, 10101 Hillwood Parkway, Fort Worth, TX 76177; telephone (817) 222-5711.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Reason for Withdrawal

The FAA published a NPRM on December 22, 2022 (87 FR 78616), Docket No. FAA-2022-1673, to amend 14 CFR 71 by establishing Class E airspace extending upward from 700 feet above the surface at Paoli Municipal Airport, Paoli, IN, to support instrument flight rule operations at this airport. Subsequent to publication, the FAA was notified that the airport has withdrawn its request to develop public instrument flight procedures at this airport which necessitated the Class E airspace.

## Conclusion

The FAA determined that the NPRM published on December 22, 2022 (87 FR 78616), is unnecessary. Therefore, the FAA withdraws that NPRM.

Issued in Fort Worth, Texas, on November 6, 2023.

Martin A. Skinner,

Acting Manager, Operations Support Group, ATO Central Service Center.

[FR Doc. 2023-24843 Filed 11-8-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4910-13-P