alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 57930.

protest 208011-K (New York).

#### China Pottery Co. *v.*United States,

*431Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the articles in question consist of trays the same in all material respects as those involved in *The Fan Co.*v. *United States*(25 Cust. Ct. 42, C. D. 1261) and *Ignaz Strauss & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(28 Cust. Ct. 280, C. D. 1423), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
**UN PUBLISHED** 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 11**  **- 7738** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,

v.
CLEMENTINE BULLOCK , Defendant

- Appellant

.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia , at Charlottesville

. Norman K. Moon , Senior District Judge. ( 3:10

- cr - 00032

- NKM

- 11 )

Submitted : May 31, 2012 Decided: June 5, 2012

Before KING, DUNCAN, and DIAZ , Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion

.
Clementine Bullock, Appellant Pro Se. Elliott J. Casey, Joseph D. Platania, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Ronald Mitchell Huber, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding pre cedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM:
Clementine Bullock appeals the district court ’ s order s denying h er 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a reduction
in her sentence based on Amendment 750 to the U.S. Sentencing
Guidelines Manual (2010) and recons ideration of that order

. We
have reviewed the record and hold the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the relief Bullock sought. S ee United States v. Munn , 595 F.3d 1 83 , 186 (4th Cir. 2010) (stating standard of review)

. Accordingly, w e affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court in its order denying
reconsideration

. See United States v. Bullock , No. 3 : 10

- cr 00 032

- NKM

- 1 1 ( W .D. Va. filed Nov. 17, 2011 & entered Nov. 18,
2011; Dec. 8, 201 1 ). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
# C_2015398EN.01006601.xml

| 30.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 398/66 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 398/66

---

Action brought on 28 September 2015 — Excalibur City v OHIM — Ferrero (MERLIN'S KINDERWELT)

(Case T-565/15)

(2015/C 398/80)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Excalibur City s.r.o. (Znojmo, Czech Republic) (represented by: E. EnginDeniz, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Ferrero SpA (Alba, Italy)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Applicant of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘MERLIN'S KINDERWELT’ – Application for registration No 1 1 2 01  969

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before OHIM

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 9 July 2015 in Case R 1538/2014-1

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul in whole the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul in whole the contested decision;

| — | order OHIM to pay the fees and costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the fees and costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
No. 58452.

protests 162118-K, etc. (New York).

#### Four Continent Book Shop et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is similar in all material respects to the paper coverings containing phonograph records the subject of *United States*v. *Radio Corp. of America, RCA Victor Division*(41 C. C. P. A. 137, C. A. D. 541), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 50324.

#### Protests 73930-K, etc., of American Fabrics Co. (Bridgeport).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83, decided February 5, 1945.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries. The protests were sustained to this extent,
# Map            [Map showing neutral zones between Saudi Arabia and Iraq and between Saudi Arabia and Kuwait].
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board

# DATES:

November 14, 2023 at 10 a.m. EST

# ADDRESSES:

                        Telephonic. Dial-in (listen only) information: Number: 1-202-599-1426, Code: 675 746 624#; or via web:                         *https://teams.microsoft.com/​l/​meetup-join/​19%3ameeting_​OTIxOTM4MzAtYTUyOC00NzNkLWFkMTUtZGQ3ODVhZTY0OGQx%40thread.v2/​0?​context=​%7b%22Tid%22%3a%223f6323b7-e3fd-4f35-b43d-1a7afae5910d%22%2c%22Oid%22%3a%2241d6f4d1-9772-4b51-a10d-cf72f842224a%22%7d*.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Kimberly Weaver, Director, Office of External Affairs, (202) 942-1640.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Board Meeting Agenda

### Open Session

1. Approval of the October 24, 2023, Board Meeting Minutes

2. Monthly Reports

(a) Participant Report

(b) Investment Report

(c) Legislative Report

3. Quarterly Reports

(d) Metrics

4. Internal Audit Update

5. Participant Survey Report

6. OPR Annual Report

7. TSP Investment Option Benchmark Study

### Closed Session

8. Information covered under 5 U.S.C. 552b (c)(6) and (c)(10).

*Authority:*5 U.S.C. 552b (e)(1).                

Dated: November 2, 2023.

Dharmesh Vashee,

General Counsel, Federal Retirement Thrift Investment Board.

[FR Doc. 2023-24642 Filed 11-7-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ARIC McDOWELL

: CIVIL ACTION

:

vs. :

: NO. 02-2760

CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE

DEPARTMENT, ET AL.

O R D E R

AND NOW, TO WIT: This 12th day of March, 2003,

it having been reported that the issues between the parties in

the above action has been settled and upon Order of the Court

pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1(b) of the Local Rules of

Civil Procedure of this Court (effective January 1, 1970), it is

ORDERED that the above action is DISMISSED with

prejudice, pursuant to agreement of counsel without costs.

MICHAEL E. KUNZ, Clerk of Court

BY: 

Michael Owens 

 Deputy Clerk

Civ 2 (7/83)

41.1(b)

Case 2:02-cv-02760-CG Document 7 Filed 03/12/2003 Page 1 of 1
No. 66728.

#### Chong Kee Jan Co., Inc., and Joseph A. Paredes & Co. *v.*United States,

protest 60/25076 (San Francisco).

Mollison, Judge:

The merchandise involved in this case consists of plastic chopsticks which were assessed with duty at the rate of 25 per centum ad valorem, by similitude under the provisions of paragraph 1559(a), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1954 (68 Stat. 1137), to the articles, not specially provided for, wholly or partly manufactured of bamboo covered by paragraph 409 of the said act, as modified. The claim relied upon is made by amendment of the protest and is for duty at the rate of 15 per centum ad valorem, by similitude under paragraph 1559(a), *supra, to the*manufactures of ivory provided for in paragraph 1538 of the said act, as modified by T.D. 54108.

At the trial of the issue, the uncontradicted real and testimonial evidence offered by the plaintiffs established that the imported plastic chopsticks equally resemble, in the use to which they are applied, chopsticks made of either ivory or bamboo. There is no question but that chopsticks of ivory would be properly classifiable under the provision in paragraph 1538, *supra,*and that chopsticks of bamboo would be properly classifiable under the provision in paragraph 409, *supra.*

The said evidence also establishes that, in respect of the materials of which they are made, the plastic chopsticks at bar most resemble ivory chopsticks.

On the record presented, it is clear that the issue in this case is controlled by our decision in the case of *Ignaz Strauss & Co., Inc., et al.*v. *United States,*45 Cust. Ct. 161, C.D. 2218, holding that where imported nonenumerated articles equally resemble, in the use to which they may be applied, two or more dutiable enumerated articles, the determinant of similitude become comparative resemblance of materials. Since the record in the case at bar establishes that the imported plastic chopsticks equally resemble ivory, and bamboo chopsticks *440in the use to which they are applied, but that, in respect of the materials of which they are composed, the imported plastic chopsticks most resemble ivory chopsticks, it follows that the imported articles are properly dutiable, by similitude to manufactures of ivory, not specially provided for, covered by paragraph 1538, *supra.*

Judgment will, therefore, issue sustaining the claim made by amendment of the protest accordingly.
**CERTIFICATION      PURSUANT TO**

**18      U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

| (1)    | The                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                              |
| (2)    | The                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |

|   | /s/                Mahesh Jayanarayan                |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------|
|   | Chief                Executive Officer and President |
|   |                                                 |
|   | October                13, 2006                      |
| 517 Route One            | C e r t i f i e d  P u b l i c  A c c o u n t a n t s  a n d  A d v i s o r s | 330  7th Avenue     |
|--------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-------------------------------|
| Iselin, New Jersey 08830 |                                                                                                                  | Suite 202                     |
| 732. 855.9600            |                                                                                                                  | New York, NY  10001 |
| Fax:732.855.9559         |                                                                                                                  | 212.867.1319                  |
| www.acsbco.com           |                                                                                                                  |                          |

|     |   |       |   |          |   |                    |                                                     |
|----------|--------|------------|--------|---------------|--------|-------------------------|----------------------------------------------------------|
| New York | · | New Jersey | · | San Francisco | · |   Los Angeles | ·      Cayman Islands |
Case No. 6,635.

#### HOLMES v. BRADSHAW.

Seamen — 'Wages—Discharge—Discharge of Cargo.

[In respect to the time for the payment of wages to the crew of a vessel upon arrival in port, it was held that 15 days were a proper allowance for the discharge of the cargo, by analogy to the time allowed under the collection act of 1799, c. 128 (Bior. & D. Laws; 1 Stat. 627, c. 22), and that the 10 days ordinarily began to run from the period when the cargo actually was or might be discharged, and that the voyage was then properly ended; but in cases where the crew were discharged upon arrival in port, and were not retained for the purpose of discharging the cargo (which is a common practice), the Í0 days should begin to run from the time of the discharge of the crew. The day of discharge is not to be included in the 10.]

[Before Davis, District Judge. Cited in The Mary, Case No. 9,191; 2 Pars. Shipp. & Adm. 366; and in Abb. Shipp. 635, note, — to the points as stated above. Nowhere reported; opinion not now accessible.]
No. 58871.

protest 170156-K (Portland, Oreg.).

#### Del Monte Meat Co. v. United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of beef similar in all material respects to that the subject of *317
      *Swift & Company et al.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 212, C. D. 1655), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

________________________________________

WAYNE COOMBS, :

Petitioner, :

: CIVIL ACTION

v. :

: NO. 04-1841

DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, et al., :

Respondents. :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 7th day of October 2014, upon receipt of the Third Circuit’s 

mandate in this case [Doc. No. 61], it is hereby ORDERED that the Report & 

Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Thomas J. Rueter [Doc. No. 46] is ADOPTED

and the Petition of Wayne Coombs for a Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED. The

case remains CLOSED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

BY THE COURT:

__/s/ Cynthia M. Rufe__

CYNTHIA M. RUFE, J.

Case 2:04-cv-01841-CMR Document 62 Filed 10/07/14 Page 1 of 1
March 2010 

20 Leading Occupations of Employed Women 

2009 Annual Averages 

(employment in thousands) 

 Total Women’s 

 Total Employed Median 

 Employed (Men and Percent Weekly 

Occupation Women Women) Women Earnings

Total, 16 years and older 

(all employed women) 66,208 139,877 47.4 $657 

Secretaries and administrative assistants 3,074 3,176 96.8 619 

Registered nurses 2,612 2,839 92.0 1,035 

Elementary and middle school teachers 2,343 2,862 81.9 891 

Cashiers 2,273 3,056 74.4 361 

Nursing, psychiatric, and 

 home health aides 1,770 2,002 88.5 430 

Retail salespersons 1,650 3,182 51.9 443 

First-line supervisors/managers 

 of retail sales workers 1,459 3,311 44.1 597 

Waiters and waitresses 1,434 2,005 71.6 363 

Maids and housekeeping cleaners 1,282 1,428 89.8 371 

Customer service representatives 1,263 1,862 67.9 587 

Childcare workers 1,228 1,292 95.1 364 

Bookkeeping, accounting, and 

 auditing clerks 1,205 1,306 92.3 627 

Receptionists and information clerks 1,168 1,277 91.5 516 

First-line supervisors/managers of 

 office and administrative support 1,163 1,632 71.3 705 

Managers, all others 1,106 3,249 34.1 1,037 

Accountants and auditors 1,084 1,754 61.8 902 

Teacher assistants 921 1,006 91.6 474 

Cooks 831 2004 41.5 371 

Office clerks, general 821 1,002 82.0 594 

Personal and home care aides 789 926 85.2 406 

Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Annual Averages 2009.
No. 52468.

protest 114175-K (Buffalo).

#### C. J. Tower & Sons *v.*United States,

*181Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that passed upon in *Tower & Sons*v. *United States*(14 Cust. Ct. 94, C. D. 919). In accordance therewith the claim for free'entry was sustained.
### Page 1 of 3 **Disposition Comments Docket No:**  

### FAA - 201 3 - 0977 These comments are in **Directorate ID:** 

### 201 3 -NM - 1 90 - AD response to an SNPRM Originating Office Tracking No.: **Next Step:** FRAN SNPRM 

### N o C omments/Only

Supportive Comments Received

– If this box is checked, no signatures are required. 

### Has the reference d service information been revised since the NPRM was issued? I f ye s, lis t latest revision and attach a cop y. Note that changes beyond the scope of the previously published NPRM will require a new notice. Contact the Directorate focal point for guidance. Instructions: Summarize all comments **by issue** (not by commenter) and provide your recommended resolution of each issue. **All comments relating to the sam e issue should be discussed together.**  Do not list all of the issues from one commenter togeth er. If changes to the AD are required based on the comments received, explain why and describe in detail what change(s) you recommend. Reference FAA - IR- M - 8040.1C Chapter 9. **ISSUE 1:** Select one o

f the following : If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree with because We disagree with because

Make the following changes to the AD: If **NO** , we don’t agree because **ISSUE 2**  **:** Select one of the following :

If other, explain : Commenter(s): What change to the AD action is requested? Why is the change requested or how is it justified? Do we agree? If **YES,** we agree because Make the following changes to the AD: If **PARTIALLY AGREE** , we agree w ith because We disagree with because Make the following changes to the AD:

### Page 2 of 3

If **NO** , we don’t agree because **For additional issues, do uble**  **- click**  **here**

### Page 3 of 3 **S ignature Section**  Signature indicates concurrence with this action. Originating Office Tracking No.: **ASE** Printed Name **: Date** 

**Branch Man ager**  **Date**
Materials Not Included in

Airworthiness Directive (AD) Docket

Docket Number: FAA- 2012-0296

Directorate Identifier: 2010NM106AD

MESSIER-DOWTY D23581-32-061 --- 11/2/09

Name/Description of Item(s) Not Included in FDMS Docket and Maintained in the 

Supplemental AD Docket

MAY BE VIEWED AT: Federal Aviation Administration

Transport Airplane Directorate

Rules Docket

1601 Lind Ave. SW.,

Renton, WA 98057

425.227.1221

DURING THE HOURS OF: 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., Monday through Friday,

except Federal holidays.

Form Date: 03/05/2008
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Election Commission

# TIME AND DATE: 

Thursday, November 2, 2023 at 10:30 a.m.

# PLACE: 

                        Hybrid meeting: 1050 First Street NE Washington, DC (12th floor) and virtual.                         *Note:*                         For those attending the meeting in person, current COVID-19 safety protocols for visitors, which are based on the CDC COVID-19 hospital admission level in Washington, DC, will be updated on the Commission's contact page by the Monday before the meeting. See the contact page at                         *https://www.fec.gov/​contact/​.*                         If you would like to virtually access the meeting, see the instructions below.                    

# STATUS: 

                        This meeting will be open to the public, subject to the above-referenced guidance regarding the COVID-19 hospital admission level and corresponding health and safety procedures. To access the meeting virtually, go to the Commission's website                         *www.fec.gov*                         and click on the banner to be taken to the meeting page.                    

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED:

Proposed Directive Regarding Investigations Conducted by the Office of General Counsel

Proposed Final Audit Report on Steve Daines for Montana (A21-04)

Draft Advisory Opinion 2023-06: Texas Majority PAC

Management and Administrative Matters

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION:

Judith Ingram, Press Officer, Telephone: (202) 694-1220.

                        Individuals who plan to attend in person and who require special assistance, such as sign language interpretation or other reasonable accommodations, should contact Laura E. Sinram, Secretary and Clerk, at (202) 694-1040 or                         *secretary@fec.gov,*                         at least 72 hours prior to the meeting date.                    

(Authority: Government in the Sunshine Act, 5 U.S.C. 552b)

Laura E. Sinram,

Secretary and Clerk of the Commission.

[FR Doc. 2023-23930 Filed 10-25-23; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 6715-01-P
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

VIRGINIA BOSSI and

BEN BOSSI

:

:

: CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-CV-4234

Plaintiffs, :

:

v. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION;

BAYER AG;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE;

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM

:

:

:

:

:

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

:

Defendants. :

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of the Court:

Kindly enter the appearances of Hope S. Freiwald, Aline Fairweather, Erin

Brennan and Kirstin J. Miller as attorneys for defendant GlaxoSmithKline PLC.

Respectfully Submitted,

_____________________________ _____________________________

Hope S. Freiwald Aline Fairweather

_____________________________ _____________________________

Erin Brennan Kirstin J. Miller

DECHERT PRICE & RHOADS

4000 Bell Atlantic Tower

1717 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2793

(215) 994-4000

Case 2:02-cv-04234-RBS Document 6 Filed 09/11/2002 Page 1 of 1