alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2015371EN.01004501.xml

| 9.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 371/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

9.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 371/45

---

Action brought on 24 September 2015 — Paglieri Sell System v OHIM (APOTEKE)

(Case T-563/15)

(2015/C 371/46)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Paglieri Sell System SpA (Pozzolo Formigaro, Italy) (represented by: P. Pozzi and F. Braga, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word element ‘APOTEKE’ — Application for registration No 13 014 691

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 23 July 2015 in Case R 2428/2014-5

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare that there was a breach and incorrect application of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and (2) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that there was a breach and incorrect application of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and (2) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | declare that there was a breach of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that there was a breach of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs and fees incurred for the present proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs and fees incurred for the present proceedings.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 7(2) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(2) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

ALBERT DIXON,

Respondent

v.

CARMEN WALLACE,

Petitioner

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

No. 1 WAL 2024

Petition for Allowance of Appeal 

from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 8th day of July, 2024, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit 

___________________________

No. 22-3032

___________________________

 

Steven C. Hayes

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Dr. Thomas Daniel

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee

Dr. Nannette Vowell; Physician Assistant Sharonda Long; Dr. Larry Davis, D.D.S; 

Dr. Madison Talliaferro, D.D.S.; Nurse Jason Kelley; Dr. Jeffrey Stieve; Rory 

Griffin, Deputy Director of Health; Ombudsman Charlotte Gardner; Staff 

Psychiatrist Eugene Lee; Staff Psychiatrist Raymond K. Molden; Staff Psychiatrist 

Shawn Richard; Stan Wofford, Senior Vice President of Correct Care Solutions 

(CCS); Jorge Dominicis, Executive of CCS/WellPath; Gerard “Jerry” Boyle, 

Founder of CCS; Nurse Parsons, Wellpath; Mail Room Supervisor Sue Alford, 

ADC; Crystal McCoy

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants 

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Western District of Arkansas - Hot Springs

____________

Submitted: May 30, 2023 

Filed: June 2, 2023

[Unpublished]

____________

 

Before LOKEN, BENTON, and STRAS, Circuit Judges. 

____________
-2- 

PER CURIAM.

In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, Steven C. Hayes appeals the district court’s1

adverse grant of summary judgment. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, 

this court affirms.

This court has reviewed the record de novo, and the parties’ arguments on 

appeal, and finds no basis for reversal. See Jackson v. Reibold, 815 F.3d 1114, 1119 

(8th Cir. 2016) (standard of review for adverse grant of summary judgment; facts 

are reviewed in light most favorable to nonmovant, and this court will affirm if 

record shows there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and moving party is 

entitled to judgment as matter of law); Scott v. Benson, 742 F.3d 335, 339-40 (8th 

Cir. 2014) (to prove deliberate indifference to a serious medical need, plaintiff must 

establish that he was diagnosed by a physician as requiring treatment, or that his 

medical need was so obvious that even a layperson would recognize the necessity 

for medical attention; and that defendant knew of but deliberately disregarded the 

serious medical need); see also Nelson v. Shuffman, 603 F.3d 439, 449 (8th Cir. 

2010) (inmate’s mere difference of opinion over matters of expert medical judgment 

or course of medical treatment does not amount to constitutional violation).

The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. The motion to expedite the 

appeal and grant default judgment is denied as moot. 

______________________________

1

The Honorable Susan O. Hickey, Chief Judge, United States District Court 

for the Western District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of 

the Honorable Mark E. Ford, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District 

of Arkansas.
CENTRALIZED RECEIVABLES SERVICE 

(CRS) 

TECHNICAL BULLETIN

Number 21-06

June 21, 2021

Mandatory Issue Response

* Beginning on July 18, 2021, if an agency does not respond to a Dispute or Proof of Debt (POD) 

Request Issue within 30 days, the case will be automatically canceled in CRS. 

* Beginning on July 18, 2021, failure respond to Agency Review Issues within 60 days will result 

in automatic removal of the Halt causing the case to continue its normal workflow (i.e., resume 

collections activities, including transfer to Cross-servicing if applicable). 

Uploading Attachments

CRS users are responsible for ensuring all uploaded documents belong to the correct debtor and are 

redacted to eliminate exposure of Personally Identifiable Information (PII). Additionally, it is imperative 

that all agency users closely review documents before uploading and again before finalizing the case. 

To assist users, CRS will implement a system change with the September 2021 Release to present a 

pop-up when an attachment is uploaded to a case, debtor, or Issue requiring confirmation of 

debt/debtor before finalizing case creation, Issue routing, etc. 

By clicking the pop-up, the CRS user is confirming verification that the document being uploaded is 

sufficiently redacted and belongs to the debtor and debt for whom the case is being created/updated.
Case 2:03-cv-05020-LDD Document 323 Filed 09/14/12 Page 1 of 8
Case 2:03-cv-05020-LDD Document 323 Filed 09/14/12 Page 2 of 8
Case 2:03-cv-05020-LDD Document 323 Filed 09/14/12 Page 3 of 8
Case 2:03-cv-05020-LDD Document 323 Filed 09/14/12 Page 4 of 8
Case 2:03-cv-05020-LDD Document 323 Filed 09/14/12 Page 5 of 8
Case 2:03-cv-05020-LDD Document 323 Filed 09/14/12 Page 6 of 8
Case 2:03-cv-05020-LDD Document 323 Filed 09/14/12 Page 7 of 8
Case 2:03-cv-05020-LDD Document 323 Filed 09/14/12 Page 8 of 8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

BRICKLAYERS AND ALLIED )

CRAFTWORKERS LOCAL 1 OF PA/DE; ) Civil Action

BRICKLAYERS AND ALLIED ) No. 02-CV-04079

CRAFTWORKERS LOCAL 1 OF PA/DE )

HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND; )

BRICKLAYERS AND ALLIED )

CRAFTWORKERS LOCAL 1 OF PA/DE )

JOINT APPRENTICESHIP AND )

TRAINING FUND; )

TILE LAYERS LOCAL 6 ANNUITY FUND;)

TMT TILE FINISHERS LOCAL 32 )

ANNUITY FUND; )

TILE LAYERS LOCAL 6 )

VACATION FUND; and )

TMT TILE FINISHERS LOCAL 32 )

VACATION FUND, )

 )

Plaintiffs )

 )

vs. )

 )

MASTRO MASONRY CONTRACTORS; )

ERNEST BOCK AND SONS, INC.; )

XL SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY; )

and JOSEPH RUSSO, Individually )

and as President of Mastro )

Masonry Contractors, )

 )

Defendants )

ERNEST BOCK AND SONS, INC., )

 )

Cross Claimant )

 )

vs. )

 )

MASTRO MASONRY CONTRACTORS, )

 )

Cross Defendant )

O R D E R

NOW, this 23rd day of February, 2004, upon

consideration of the request of defendants Ernest Bock and Sons,

Case 2:02-cv-04079-JKG Document 28 Filed 02/24/2004 Page 1 of 2
Inc. for the undersigned to enter an order dismissing its

counterclaim pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of

Civil Procedure, which request is attached; it appearing that

Mastro Masonry Contractors is yet to plead or otherwise respond

to the counterclaim, 

IT IS ORDERED that the counterclaim is dismissed

without prejudice, without costs.

BY THE COURT:

 

James Knoll Gardner

United States District Judge

Case 2:02-cv-04079-JKG Document 28 Filed 02/24/2004 Page 2 of 2
No. 54562.

#### Max Schuster *v.*United States,

protests 128070-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of synthetic stones the same in all material respects as those the subject of *S. Nathan & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(37 C. C. P. A. 99, C. A. D. 426), the claim at 10 percent under paragraph 1528 was sustained.
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDG MENT

No. 04

- 13

- 00131

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF A.G. , a C hild

From the 407th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2012

- PA

- 01373

Honorable Richard Garcia, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE MARION

, JUSTICE BARNARD , AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s order is AFFIRMED.

SIGNED August 28, 2013.

_________________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez , Justice
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Robert P. Hughes, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of TenFold Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrants other certifying
officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying
officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over
financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.



|                                          
|------------------------------------------
|                                          
|/s/ Robert P. Hughes                      
|Robert P. Hughes                          
|Chief Financial Officer and Chief of Staff
|August 1, 2006
# C_2017249EN.01001101.xml

| 31.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 249/11 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

31.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 249/11

---

Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 1 June 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie — Poland) — Piotr Zarski v Andrzej Stadnicki

(Case C-330/16) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Combating late payments in commercial transactions - Directive 2011/7/EU - Commercial lease contracts of indefinite duration - Late rent payments - Contracts concluded before the period for transposing that directive had expired - National rules - Exclusion of such contracts from the temporal scope of that directive))

(2017/C 249/15)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Sąd Okręgowy w Warszawie

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Piotr Zarski

Respondent: Andrzej Stadnicki

Operative part of the judgment

Article 12(4) of Directive 2011/7/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 February 2011 on combating late payment in commercial transactions must be interpreted as meaning that the Member States may exclude from the scope of that directive late payments in the performance of a contract concluded before 16 March 2013, even where those late payments occur after that date.

---

(1)  
  OJ C 335, 12.9.2016.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                                           7
<LEGEND>
This  schedule  contains  summary  financial   information  extracted  from  the
financial  statements of Protective  Life and Annuity  Insurance  Company and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to such financial statements.
</LEGEND>

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                  JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                    JUN-30-1999
<DEBT-HELD-FOR-SALE>            370,420,788
<DEBT-CARRYING-VALUE>           0
<DEBT-MARKET-VALUE>             0
<EQUITIES>                      0
<MORTGAGE>                      5,798,217
<REAL-ESTATE>                   0
<TOTAL-INVEST>                  435,370,137
<CASH>                          4,623,274
<RECOVER-REINSURE>              22,425,140
<DEFERRED-ACQUISITION>          128,324,394
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  601,266,548
<POLICY-LOSSES>                 436,823,295
<UNEARNED-PREMIUMS>             0
<POLICY-OTHER>                  0
<POLICY-HOLDER-FUNDS>           11,344,669
<NOTES-PAYABLE>                 0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           2,000
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        2,500,000
<OTHER-SE>                      119,864,360
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>    601,266,548
<PREMIUMS>                      10,078,531
<INVESTMENT-INCOME>             5,954,040
<INVESTMENT-GAINS>              37
<OTHER-INCOME>                  2,344
<BENEFITS>                      6,059,584
<UNDERWRITING-AMORTIZATION>     3,043,818
<UNDERWRITING-OTHER>            3,544,292
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 3,387,258
<INCOME-TAX>                    948,433
<INCOME-CONTINUING>             2,438,825
<DISCONTINUED>                  0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    2,438,825
<EPS-BASIC>                   0 <F1>
<EPS-DILUTED>                   0 <F1>
<RESERVE-OPEN>                  0
<PROVISION-CURRENT>             0
<PROVISION-PRIOR>               0
<PAYMENTS-CURRENT>              0
<PAYMENTS-PRIOR>                0
<RESERVE-CLOSE>                 0
<CUMULATIVE-DEFICIENCY>         0
<FN>
<F1>Protective  Life and  Annuity  Life  Insurance  Company  is a  wholly-owned
subsidiary  of  Protective  Life  Insurance  Company,  which is a  wholly--owned
subsidiary  of  Protective  Life  Corporation  (NYSE:  PL)and is not required to
present EPS information.
</FN>



</TABLE>
No. 49059.

#### Protests 18884-K, etc., of Nordmark Chemical Works, Inc. (New York).

*228Opinion by

Cole, J.

The merchandise was classified and claimed dutiable, at the same rates and under the same paragraphs as similar merchandise covered by the decision in *Quong Yuen Shing Co.*v. *United States*(31 C. C. P. A. 43, C. A. D. 247). In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of said cited case the merchandise at bar was found to contain salt and was therefore excluded from paragraph 5 (chemical compounds). The protests were sustained to this extent.
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 23 (Monday, February 4, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 7850]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-02334]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

Federal Aviation Administration

Sixty First Meeting: RTCA Special Committee 135, Environmental 
Conditions and Test Procedures for Airborne Equipment

AGENCY: Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), U.S. Department of 
Transportation (DOT).

ACTION: Meeting Notice of RTCA Special Committee 135, Environmental 
Conditions and Test Procedures for Airborne Equipment.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The FAA is issuing this notice to advise the public of the 
Sixty-First meeting of the RTCA Special Committee 135, Environmental 
Conditions and Test Procedures for Airborne Equipment.

DATES: The meeting will be held March 21, 2013 from 9 a.m. to 3 p.m.

ADDRESSES: The meeting will be held at RTCA Headquarters, 1150 18th St. 
NW., Suite 910, Washington DC, 20036.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The RTCA Secretariat, 1150 18th Street 
NW., Suite 910, Washington, DC, 20036, or by telephone at (202) 330-
0652/(202) 833-9339, fax at (202) 833-9434, or Web site at http://www.rtca.org.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Pursuant to section 10(a)(2) of the Federal 
Advisory Committee Act (Pub. L. 92-463, 5 U.S.C., App.), notice is 
hereby given for a meeting of Special Committee 135. The agenda will 
include the following:

March 21, 2013

 Chairmen's Opening Remarks, Introductions.
 Introduction of FAA Representative
 Approval of Summary from the Sixtieth Meeting (RTCA Paper No. 
012-13/SC135-691)
 Review open proposals for Users Guides
 Review Working Group Drafts
     Section 4
     Section 5
     Section 8
     Section 16
     Section 20
     Section 21
 New and Unfinished Business
     Errata Sheet
     Schedule for Users Guide
 Establish Date for Next SC-135 Meeting.
 Adjourn.

    Attendance is open to the interested public but limited to space 
availability. With the approval of the chairman, members of the public 
may present oral statements at the meeting. Persons wishing to present 
statements or obtain information should contact the person listed in 
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section. Members of the public may 
present a written statement to the committee at any time.

    Issued in Washington, DC, on January 24, 2013.
Richard F. Gonzalez,
Management Analyst, Business Operations Group, ANG-A12, Federal 
Aviation Administration.
[FR Doc. 2013-02334 Filed 2-1-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-13-P
```
Exhibit 32

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Real Logic, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Bradford L. Tolley, Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer (principal financial officer) of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge and belief:

1.

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date:  May 24, 2007

|        |                                      
|------- | -------------------------------------
|Signed: | /s/ Bradford L. Tolley               
|        | Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer
Before the Third Division,

February 4, 1948

No. 52156.

protest 116507-K (New York).

#### Park & Tilford Import Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J

At the trial it was stipulated that the merchandise, issues, and facts herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351), and that the quantities reported by the inspector as not landed were not in fact landed. In accordance with stipulation and following the decision.cited it was held that the merchandise, insofar as it pertains to the quantities reported by the inspector as not landed, is subject to an allowance in duties and internal revenue taxes. The protest was sustained to this extent.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5
<LEGEND>
The Schedule  Contains  Summary  Financial  Information  Extracted  From Balance
Sheets and Statements of Income
</LEGEND>
<CIK>                         0000878616
<NAME>                        Human Pheromone Sciences, Inc.
<MULTIPLIER>                  1

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                  JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                                    MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                              177,000
<SECURITIES>                                              0
<RECEIVABLES>                                     1,228,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                       (297,000)
<INVENTORY>                                       1,975,000
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                  3,114,000
<PP&E>                                              802,000
<DEPRECIATION>                                     (790,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                    3,126,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                             1,112,000
<BONDS>                                                   0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                     0
<PREFERRED>                                       3,556,000
<COMMON>                                         17,667,000
<OTHER-SE>                                      (19,209,000)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                      3,126,000
<SALES>                                           1,533,000
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                  1,533,000
<CGS>                                               546,000
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                       546,000
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  1,268,000
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                          0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   22,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    (305,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                              0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                (305,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                            0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                           0
<CHANGES>                                                 0
<NET-INCOME>                                       (305,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                           (0.09)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                         (0.09)


</TABLE>