alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 32.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION OF****Principal EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**CERTIFICATION OF****Principal Financial Officer**

**CERTIFICATION OF EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR**

**PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

 

In connection with the Annual Report of Digital Brands Media and Marketing Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ending August 31, 2019, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Linda Perry, Executive Director, Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer, of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

 

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

 

| Date: December 4, 2019 | */s/ Linda Perry*                                                            |
|------------------------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                   | Linda Perry                                                                  |
|                   | Principal Executive Officer

Principal Financial Officer

Executive Director |
# C_2015328EN.01001501.xml

| 5.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 328/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 328/15

---

Action brought on 28 July 2015 — U-R LAB/OHIM (THE DINING EXPERIENCE)

(Case T-422/15)

(2015/C 328/14)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: U-R LAB (Paris, France) (represented by: G. Barbaut, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word elements ‘THE DINING EXPERIENCE’ — Application for registration No 12 587 697

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 20 May 2015 in Case R 2541/2014-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul and alter the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul and alter the contested decision;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
Exhibit 32.1
 
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In connection with the Annual Report of RTG Ventures, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ending August 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Dominic Hawes-Fairley, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:
 
 (1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
 
 (2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 
 /s/ Dominic Hawes-FairleyDominic Hawes-Fairley
Chief Executive Officer

December 14, 2010
No. 61714.

#### Aero Sea Shipping Corporation *v.*United States,

protest 309436-K (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

The protest was dismissed.
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Dmitry Beinus, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Shoe Pavilion, Inc. for the period ended March 29, 2008;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a
material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be
designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be
designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based upon
such evaluation;

d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control
over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the
equivalent function):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information;
and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 12, 2008

/s/ DMITRY BEINUS	 Dmitry Beinus
   Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

---
GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE SALMON NATIONAL FOREST AND VICINITY, EAST-CENTRAL IDAHO

*Compiled By* Karl V. Evans *and* Gregory
    N. Green

thumbnail image of Bighorn Crags, Idaho

Version 1.0

---



I-2765 PDF file (377 KB)
(This version of the report is accessible as defined in Section 508.)

Map Sheet 1 PDF file (10.10 MB)Map Sheet 2 PDF file (6.93 MB)

I-2765 Metadata file (13 KB)

Bases ZIP file (24.57 MB) Contains
  georegistered raster images of the topographic base maps.

ArcInfo export  files of each geospatial data set are included 
  in the archived files (below).
I-2765 TAR.GZ file (2.29 MB) I-2765 ZIP file (2.28 MB)



---

|AccessibilityFOIAPrivacyPolicies and Notices                                                                                                                                                           
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|U.S. Department of the Interior | U.S. Geological Survey
      URL: https://pubsdata.usgs.gov/pubs/imap/i-2765/
Questions or Assistance: USGS Web Contact
Page Last Modified: Wed Nov 30 17:36 EDT 2016

---
# C_2015294EN.01008001.xml

| 7.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/80 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/80

---

Action brought on 3 July 2015 — Arrom Conseil v OHIM — Puig France (Roméo has a Gun by Romano Ricci)

(Case T-358/15)

(2015/C 294/96)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Arrom Conseil (Paris, France) (represented by: C. Herissay Ducamp and J. Blanchard, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Puig France SAS (Paris, France)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Applicant: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant:

Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word elements ‘Roméo has a gun by Romano Ricci’ — Community trade mark application No 11 193 604

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before OHIM:

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 26 March 2015 in Case R 1020/2014-1

Contested decision:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision in part; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision in part;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Articles 8(1)(b) and 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Articles 8(1)(b) and 8(5) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
Exhibit 31.1 I, Dennis Rushovich, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Form 10-KSB of Hartville Group, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Dated: March 31, 2008         /s/ Dennis Rushovich   Dennis Rushovich, CEO     
47
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-6788

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

SERGIO ESTUPINAN ESTUPINAN, a/k/a Robert Julio Zavala, a/k/a 

The Lawyer,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard, 

Senior District Judge. (4:09-cr-00074-H-1; 4:13-cv-00195-H)

Submitted: September 19, 2014 Decided: October 2, 2014

Before KEENAN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Sergio Estupinan Estupinan, Appellant Pro Se. Jennifer P. MayParker, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North 

Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Sergio Estupinan Estupinan seeks to appeal the 

district court’s order dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C. 

§ 2255 (2012) motion. The order is not appealable unless a 

circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 

28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(B) (2012). A certificate of 

appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of 

the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) 

(2012). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. 

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller-El v. 

Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district court 

denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must 

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the 

denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Estupinan has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, 

we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 
3

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before 

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. 

DISMISSED
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

   Schedule of Year-To-Date Principal and Interest Distributions
                           to
                  Certificateholders
                                                                              Ending
Class                   Interest             Principal      Losses           Balance
<S>                     <C>                  <C>            <C>              <C>
A                        945,967.74         602,685.79         0.00         86,397,314.21
C                        378,002.49               0.00         0.00          1,999,900.00
M1                        51,433.44               0.00         0.00          4,500,000.00
M2                        42,497.53               0.00         0.00          3,500,000.00
M3                        40,463.96               0.00         0.00          3,000,000.00
P                              0.00               0.00         0.00                100.00
R1                             0.00               0.00         0.00                  0.00
R2                             0.00               0.00         0.00                  0.00


</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a Priority Mail Express International, Priority Mail International & Commercial ePacket contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Competitive Product List in the Mail Classification Schedule.

# DATES:

*Date of notice:*                         November 13, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Christopher C. Meyerson, (202) 268-7820.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on October 27, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail Express International, Priority Mail International & Commercial ePacket Contract 3 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-28 and CP2024-28.                

Sarah Sullivan,

Attorney, Ethics & Legal Compliance.

[FR Doc. 2023-24873 Filed 11-9-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
**Exhibit32.1**

 

**ChiefExecutive Officer Certification**

 

In connection with General Maritime Corporation’s (the“Company”) annual report of on Form 10-K for the three months and fiscal yearending December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commissionon the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer ofthe Company, hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuantto Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

 

(1)          The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and

 

(2)          The informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and result of operations of the Company.

 

 
|                  |                                                      |
|-----------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------|
| Date:  March 16, 2005 |    /s/  Peter C. Georgiopoulos             |   |
|                  | Name: Peter C.  Georgiopoulos                             |
|                  | Title: Chairman, Chief  Executive Officer & President |

 

The foregoing certification is being furnished solelypursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 and is not being filed as part of the Report or asa separate disclosure document.

 

----
No. 65385.

#### Aut Customs Brokers, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 60/20396, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Since the protests were filed more than 60 days after liquidation, they were dismissed as untimely, by virtue of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.
No. 59974.

#### A. L. Erlanger Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 266120-K and 266131-K (Boston).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of waste of rayon or other synthetic textile, not wholly or in chief value of cellulose acetate, the same in all material respects as that involved in *A. L. Erlanger Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(35 Cust. Ct. 189, C. D. 1742), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. P68/201.

protest 64/22847 (New York).

No. P68/202.

protest 67/69750 (New York).

#### Isaac B. Cohen & Sons Corp. *v.*United States, M. Pressner & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Kichardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of so-called “miniature hunting knives” similar in all material respects to those the subject of *M. Pressner & Co.*v. *United States*(56 Cust. Ct. 489, C.D. 2686), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
# Map            Southern Lebanon and vicinity.
# C_2016078EN.01002602.xml

| 29.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 78/26 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

29.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 78/26

---

Action brought on 18 December 2015 — Guccio Gucci v OHIM — Guess? IP Holder (Representation of four interlaced letters G)

(Case T-753/15)

(2016/C 078/37)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Guccio Gucci SpA (Florence, Italy) (represented by: P. Roncaglia, F. Rossi and N. Parrotta, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Guess? IP Holder LP (Los Angeles, United States)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: International registration designating the European Union in respect of the figurative mark representing four interlaced letters G — International registration designating the European Union No 1 090 048

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before OHIM

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 14 October 2015 in Case R 1703/2014-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs incurred by the applicant during these proceedings; |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs incurred by the applicant during these proceedings;

| — | order Guess to pay the costs incurred by the applicant in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM. |
| --- | --- |

—

order Guess to pay the costs incurred by the applicant in the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Articles 8(1)(b), 8(5) and 75 of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Articles 8(1)(b), 8(5) and 75 of Regulation No 207/2009.

---