alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 99.1



WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE
OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer
and the Chief Financial Officer of Global Imaging Systems, Inc. (the Company), each hereby certifies that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:



| | (a) |  | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2002 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) |  | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- |  | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|February 13, 2003 |  |  |  | /s/    Thomas S. Johnson                                            
|----------------- |  |  |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------
|Date              |  |  |  | Thomas S. Johnson, President and Chief Executive Officer            
|                 
|February 13, 2003 |  |  |  | /s/ Raymond Schilling                                               
|Date              |  |  |  | Raymond Schilling, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, and
Treasurer
March 18, 2011

Note to the Montana Oil and Gas SIP File

Docket ID # EPA-R08-OAR-2007-0662

Subject: February 22, 2011, Communication with the Montana Department of 

Environmental Quality (MDEQ) during public comment period

From: Kevin Leone / Environmental Scientist

Region 8, Environmental Protection Agency

This is to acknowledge that representatives from EPA and the MDEQ participated in a 

videoconference on February 22, 2011.

1. The subject matter of the videoconference was to address disapproval issues pertaining to 

EPA’s proposed rule action published on January 6, 2011 (76 FR 758.)

2. Participants in the video conference from EPA were: Jim Martin, Carol Rushin, Sara 

Laumann, Peter Ornstein, Callie Videtich, Monica Morales and Kevin Leone

3. Participants in the video conference from MDEQ were: Richard Opper, Dave Klemp and 

a representative from the MDEQ permitting department.
| About Violence Against Women Office (VAWO)What's NewState-by-State VAWO Grant ActivitiesPress Releases and RemarksPublicationsQuestions?        Comments?askocpa@        ojp.usdoj.gov   Back to   VAWO Home   Back to   OJP Home

  
Domestic Violence Awareness Manual- Letter from the Attorney General 
- Breaking the Silence on Domestic Violence 
- Domestic Violence ... What Is It? 
- Who are the Victims of Violence Against Women? 
- Myths Feed Denial About Family Violence 
- What Can You Say To A Victim? 
- What is a Safety Plan? 
- What Can Each of Us Do? 
- What Can Communities Do To Prevent Domestic Violence? 
- Domestic Violence and the Workplace 
- Where Can I Get Help? 
- State Domestic Violence Coalitions 
**Help is available--Call the National Domestic Violence Hotline at 1-800-799-SAFE or 1-800-787-3224 (TDD).** |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
EXHIBIT 13.2  Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002  In connection with this Amendment to Annual Report for Fiscal 2011 Ended August 31, 2011 of Golden Goliath Resources Ltd., company organized under the British Columbia Corporations Act(the Company) on Form 20-F as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Stephen Pearce, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  /s/ Stephen Pearce Stephen Pearce, Chief Financial Officer   Date: August 21, 2012
Before the Third Division,

April 18, 1962

No. 66697.

#### Kreiss & Co., Ltd., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 59/9827, etc. (Los Angeles).

*424Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of decorative after-dinner cups and saucers the same in all material respects as those the subject of *United States*v. *The Baltimore & Ohio R.R. Co. a/c United China & Glass Company*(47 C.C.P.A. 1, C.A.D. 719), the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (a) The items entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption prior to September 10, 1955, at 50 cents per dozen, but not less than 45 percent nor more than 70 percent ad valorem, under paragraph 212, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 51802), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T.D. 51909), and (b) all items entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on and after September 10, 1955, at 45 percent under said paragraph, as modified by the Japanese Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 53866), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T.D. 53877).
OFFICER'S CERTIFICATE PURSUANT TO SECTION 3.18 OF THE POOLING AND SERVICING
                    AGREEMENT DATED AS OF OCTOBER 26, 2000


                  BANK OF AMERICA MORTGAGE SECURITIES, INC.
              MORTGAGE PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2000-6


I, Robert S. O'Neill, Senior Vice President of Bank of America, N.A. (the
"Servicer"), the Servicer in connection with Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates
Series 2000-6, do hereby certify that (i) a review of the activities of the
Servicer during the preceding calendar year and of its performance under this
Agreement (the "Agreement") has been made under my supervision, (ii) to the best
of my knowledge, based on such review, the Servicer has fulfilled in all
material aspects its obligations under the Agreement throughout such year.

Certified on this 4th day of March 2003.

                                    BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.


                                       By:
                                          ------------------------------
                                            Name:  Robert S. O'Neill
                                            Title: Senior Vice President



Inv M64
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 206 (Thursday, October 26, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 73590]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-23680]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

[RTID 0648-XD469]


Fisheries of the South Atlantic; South Atlantic Fishery 
Management Council; Public Meetings

AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and 
Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), Commerce.

ACTION: Notice of South Atlantic Fishery Management Council's (Council) 
Seminar Series presentation via webinar.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Council will host a presentation from NOAA Fisheries on a 
Marine Recreational Information Program Fishing Effort Survey pilot 
study results and next steps via webinar.

DATES: The webinar presentation will be held on Tuesday, November 14, 
2023, from 1 p.m. until 2:30 p.m.

ADDRESSES: 
    Meeting address: The presentation will be provided via webinar. The 
webinar is open to members of the public. Information, including a link 
to webinar registration will be posted on the Council's website at: 
https://safmc.net/safmc-seminar-series/ as it becomes available.
    Council address: South Atlantic Fishery Management Council, 4055 
Faber Place Drive, Suite 201, N Charleston, SC 29405.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kim Iverson, Public Information 
Officer, SAFMC; phone: (843) 302-8439 or toll free: (866) SAFMC-10; 
fax: (843) 769-4520; email: <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#4f2426226126392a3d3c20210f3c2e29222c61212a3b"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="eb808286c5829d8e99988485ab988a8d8688c5858e9f">[email protected]</span></a>.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Council will host a presentation from 
NOAA Fisheries on a Marine Recreational Information Program--Fishing 
Effort Survey pilot study where potential bias in the recreational 
fishing effort estimate was discovered. The presentation will describe 
key findings of the pilot study and describe next steps to study the 
potential bias and potential changes to the survey. A question-and-
answer session will follow the presentation. Members of the public will 
have the opportunity to participate in the discussion. The presentation 
is for informational purposes only and no management actions will be 
taken.

Special Accommodations

    The meeting is physically accessible to people with disabilities. 
Requests for auxiliary aids should be directed to the Council office 
(see ADDRESSES) 5 days prior to the meeting.

    Note: The times and sequence specified in this agenda are 
subject to change.

    Authority: 16 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.

    Dated: October 23, 2023.
Rey Israel Marquez,
Acting Deputy Director, Office of Sustainable Fisheries, National 
Marine Fisheries Service.
[FR Doc. 2023-23680 Filed 10-25-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-22-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 24-6203

WILLIE YOUNG, 

Petitioner - Appellant, 

v. 

TONYA JAMES, Warden, 

Respondent - Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at 

Greenville. Cameron McGowan Currie, Senior District Judge. (6:22-cv-00428-CMC) 

Submitted: May 30, 2024 Decided: June 4, 2024

Before GREGORY and HARRIS, Circuit Judges, and MOTZ, Senior Circuit Judge. 

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. 

Willie Young, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. 

USCA4 Appeal: 24-6203 Doc: 11 Filed: 06/04/2024 Pg: 1 of 2
2

PER CURIAM: 

Willie Young seeks to appeal the district court’s order adopting the recommendation 

of the magistrate judge and dismissing as successive his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. 

We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely 

filed. 

In civil cases, parties have 30 days after the entry of the district court’s final 

judgment or order to note an appeal, Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), unless the district court 

extends the appeal period under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5) or reopens the appeal period under 

Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6). “[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal in a civil case is a 

jurisdictional requirement.” Bowles v. Russell, 551 U.S. 205, 214 (2007). 

The district court entered its order on January 3, 2023, and the appeal period expired 

on February 2, 2023. Young filed the notice of appeal on February 21, 2024.*

 Because 

Young failed to file a timely notice of appeal or to obtain an extension or reopening of the 

appeal period, we dismiss the appeal. 

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are 

adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process. 

DISMISSED

* For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of 

appeal is the earliest date Young could have delivered the notice to prison officials for 

mailing to the court. Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1); Houston v. Lack, 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988). 

USCA4 Appeal: 24-6203 Doc: 11 Filed: 06/04/2024 Pg: 2 of 2
Case 2:03-cr-00745-JCJ Document 147 Filed 02/15/12 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 99.1**   **Date: April 27, 2007** **Contact: Charles P. Huffman**   **Release: Immediately** **Phone: 251-476-2720****EnergySouth, Inc. reports fiscal 2007 second quarter earnings and announces increase in annualdividend****Mobile, AL:**The Board of Directors of EnergySouth, Inc., at a meeting held April 27, 2007,declared a quarterly dividend on the outstanding Common Stock of $0.25 per share, to be paid July1, 2007 to holders of record as of June 15, 2007. The new annual rate of $1.00 per sharerepresents an 8.7% increase and the 32nd consecutive year in which dividends have been increased.Net income for EnergySouth, Inc. for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 was $6,831,000 or $0.85 perdiluted share, as compared to net income for the quarter ended March 31, 2006 of $6,661,000, or$0.84 per diluted share. Net income for the six month periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 was$11,445,000, or $1.42 per diluted share, and $11,145,000, or $1.40 per diluted share, respectively.The increase in earnings of $0.01 per diluted share for the second fiscal quarter was due primarilyto an increase in earnings from Mobile Gas’ distribution business. The increase in earnings of$0.02 per diluted share for the six months ended March 31, 2007 was due to increased earnings fromthe Company’s Bay Gas subsidiary during the first fiscal quarter.Bay Gas’ earnings for the second quarter of fiscal 2007 were approximately the same as for theprior-year period, and increased by $0.03 per diluted share for the six months ended March 31, 2007as compared to the same prior-year period. Earnings from increased storage revenues associatedwith short-term storage agreements and an increase in the amount of interest expense capitalizedfor the construction of Bay Gas’ third underground natural gas storage cavern were partially offsetby an increase in operating expenses.Earnings per diluted share from the Company’s natural gas distribution business increased $0.01 perdiluted share during the second fiscal quarter resulting in a decrease of $0.01 per diluted sharefor the six month period ended March 31, 2007. Margins for the second fiscal quarter reflect theimpact of rate adjustments and increased consumption by temperature-sensitive customers.Earnings per diluted share from other business operations for the three and six months ended March31, 2007 approximated earnings from the same periods last year.

 
EnergySouth, Inc. is the holding company for a family of energy businesses. Mobile Gas purchases,sells, and transports natural gas to residential, commercial, and industrial customers in Mobile,Alabama and surrounding areas. Mobile Gas also provides merchandise sales, service, and financing.EnergySouth Storage Services is the general partner of Bay Gas Storage Company, a limitedpartnership that provides underground storage and delivery of natural gas for Mobile Gas and othercustomers. EnergySouth Services is the general partner of Southern Gas Transmission Company, whichis engaged in the intrastate transportation of natural gas.**ENERGYSOUTH, INC.**
No. 66236.

#### The Walter Hatcher Co., Inc., and W. J. Byrnes & Co. of N.Y., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 60/23277 (New York).

*384Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of candlestick holders similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Mottahedeh Creations, Ltd., et al.*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 9, C.D. 2095), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

No. 66237. — Shabry Trading Company et al. *v.*United States, protests 316666-K, etc. (Boston).

Protests Overruled. — When these cases were called for trial, counsel for the plaintiffs submitted on the record, without introducing any evidence in support of the claim. 'Counsel for the defendant moved that the protests he overruled.

Opinion by Wilson, J. There being nothing in the record tending to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the classification by the collector, the protests were overruled.
Before the Third Division,

January 16, 1951

No. 55130.

#### M. A. Hoenecke *v.*United States,

protest 132809-K (Minneapolis).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities -cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.
Before the Second Division,

October 10, 1957

No. 61248.

protests 281531-K, 293016-K, and 305408-K (New York).

#### Keuffel & Esser Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of drawing instrument cases similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 59557, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 49542.

#### Protest 948920-G of Sprouse-Reitz Co. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

An examination of said papers failed to disclose any reason for disturbing the action of the collector. The protest was therefore overruled.
# C_2015337EN.01004001.xml

| 12.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 337/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 337/40

---

Action brought on 24 August 2015 — Ahrend Furniture v Commission

(Case T-482/15)

(2015/C 337/45)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Ahrend Furniture (Zaventem, Belgium) (represented by: A. Lepièce, V. Dor and S. Engelen, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

| — | order the annulment of the decision of the Commission of unknown date awarding lot 1 of call for tender OIB.DR.2/PO/2014/055/622 — ‘Supply of furniture’ to another tenderer; |
| --- | --- |

—

order the annulment of the decision of the Commission of unknown date awarding lot 1 of call for tender OIB.DR.2/PO/2014/055/622 — ‘Supply of furniture’ to another tenderer;

| — | order the defendant to pay all the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay all the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on two pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging that the defendant made errors of fact and of law during the qualitative and technical analysis of the applicant’s tender. |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging that the defendant made errors of fact and of law during the qualitative and technical analysis of the applicant’s tender.

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging that the applicant was not informed, despite requests for same, of particulars relating to the financial evaluation of the tenders. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging that the applicant was not informed, despite requests for same, of particulars relating to the financial evaluation of the tenders.

---
**Exhibit 31.2**
**CERTIFICATION**
     I, Wayne W. Byers, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of ebank FinancialServices, Inc.;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to makethe statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statementswere made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this report, fairly present in all material respectsthe financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the smallbusiness issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
     4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I areresponsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the smallbusiness issuer and have:
     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused suchdisclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, toensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is beingprepared;
     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosurecontrols and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about theeffectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of theperiod covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting that occurred during the smallbusiness issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’sfourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small businessissuer’s internal control over financial reporting;
     5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I havedisclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control overfinancial reporting, to the small business issuer’s auditors and the auditcommittee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performingthe equivalent functions):
     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonablylikely to adversely affect the small business issuer’s ability to record,process, summarize and report financial information; and
     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting.
Date: November 12, 2004      By: /s/ Wayne W. Byers       Wayne W. Byers, Chief Financial Officer
Before the First Division,

July 11, 1950

No. 54531.

#### Southern Cross Exporters, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 144804-K (New York).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

An oral stipulation showing that the merchandise in question was not “pickled or salted,” but “in fact dried and unsalted,” the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<PAGE>   1
 
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1
 
                       CONSENT OF PEDERSEN & HOUPT, P.C.
 
   
     Pedersen & Houpt, P.C. hereby consents to all references made to it in
Amendment No. 1 to this Registration Statement on Form S-1 of SpinCycle, Inc.,
as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 29, 1998.
    
 
                                          /s/   PEDERSEN & HOUPT, P.C.
 
                                          --------------------------------------
                                                  Pedersen & Houpt, P.C.
 
Chicago, Illinois
   
September 29, 1998