alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 2:04-cr-00673-JS Document 113 Filed 02/06/09 Page 1 of 11
Case 2:04-cr-00673-JS Document 113 Filed 02/06/09 Page 2 of 11
Case 2:04-cr-00673-JS Document 113 Filed 02/06/09 Page 3 of 11
Case 2:04-cr-00673-JS Document 113 Filed 02/06/09 Page 4 of 11
Case 2:04-cr-00673-JS Document 113 Filed 02/06/09 Page 5 of 11
Case 2:04-cr-00673-JS Document 113 Filed 02/06/09 Page 6 of 11
Case 2:04-cr-00673-JS Document 113 Filed 02/06/09 Page 7 of 11
Case 2:04-cr-00673-JS Document 113 Filed 02/06/09 Page 8 of 11
Case 2:04-cr-00673-JS Document 113 Filed 02/06/09 Page 9 of 11
Case 2:04-cr-00673-JS Document 113 Filed 02/06/09 Page 10 of 11
Case 2:04-cr-00673-JS Document 113 Filed 02/06/09 Page 11 of 11
September 2 0 , 2016

Exemption No. 14479 A

Regulatory Docket No. FAA

– 2015

– 5047

Mr. Richard Sidwe ll

In1View

2267 Big Trail Circle

Reno, NV 89521

Dear Mr. Sidw e ll :

This letter is to inform you that we have granted your petition for an amendment. It explains

the basis for our decision, describes its effect, and lists any changes to the original conditions

and limitations.

By letter dated posted to the public docket on July 21, 2016

, you petitioned the Federal

Aviation Administration (FAA) on behalf of In1View (hereinafter petitioner or operator) for

an amendment to your current exemption . That exemption from §§ 61.23(a) and ( c ),

61.101(e)(4 ) and (5), 61.113(a), 61.315(a) , 91.7(a), 91.119(c), 91.121, 91.151(a)(1),

91.405(a), 91.407(a)(1), 91.409(a)(1) and (2), and 91.417(a) and (b) of Title 14, Code of

Federal Regulations (14 CFR) allows the petitioner to conduct UAS operations

. You

requested an amendment to change the company name f rom In 1 Spot Photography, The

Sidewell Group to In1View

.

In your petition, you indicate that there has been no change in the conditions and reasons

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

The FAA h as determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition

in the Federal Register because the requested amendment to the exemption would not set a

precedent, and any delay in acting on this pe tition would be detrimental to the petit ioner

.

Our Decision

The FAA has determined that the justification for the issuance of Exemption No. 14479

remains valid and is in the public interest. Therefore, under the authority contained2

in 49 U.S.C

. 106(f), 40113, and 44701, delegated to me by the Administrator, the operator is

granted an amendment to change the operator name

.

The operator shall add this amendment to its original exemption.

Conditions and Limitations

In this grant of amendment, In1View is hereafter refer red to as the operator. All conditions

and limitations within Grant of Exemption No. 14479 remain in effect

.

Failure to comply with any of the conditions and limitations of this grant of exemption will be

grounds for the immediate suspension or rescission of this exemption.

T his exemption terminates on January 31, 2018 , unless sooner superseded or rescinded.

Sincerely,

/ s/

John S. Duncan

Di rector, Flight Standards Service
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                            (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

In connection with this annual filing of DNAPrint genomics, Inc., a Utah
corporation (the "Company"), on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31,
2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), I,
Richard Gabriel, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/S/ Richard Gabriel
---------------------------
Richard Gabriel
Chief Executive Officer/President
Date: December 30, 2004
# C_2016326EN.01000802.xml

| 5.9.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 326/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

5.9.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 326/8

---

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Rejonowy w Koninie (Poland) lodged on 28 January 2016 — Halina Grodecka; intervening parties: Józef Konieczka and Others

(Case C-50/16)

(2016/C 326/15)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring Court

Referring Court

Sąd Rejonowy w Koninie

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Halina Grodecka; intervening parties: Józef Konieczka and Others

By order of 2 June 2016, the Court of Justice of the European Union (Tenth Chamber) declared that it manifestly lacks jurisdiction to reply to the question referred for a preliminary ruling by the Sąd Rejonowy w Koninie (Poland).

---
August 5, 1948

No. 52494.

protest 116232-K.

#### —Waitt & Bond, Inc. *v.*United States,

C. D. 1113. Plaintiff’s application for rehearing denied.
Before the Second Division,

September 11, 1947

No. 51897.

#### K. Ooka et al. *v.*United States,

protests 33189-K, etc. (Honolulu, etc.).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Mercer Insurance Group, Inc. (the Company) on
Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David B. Merclean, Senior Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company. Date:   May 10, 2005
    /s/ David B. MercleanDavid B. MercleanSenior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer 34
Certificate  of  Amendment
Secretary  of  State
204  North  Carson  St.
Carson  City,  Nevada  89701-4299

Certificate  of  Amendment
Of  Articles  of  Incorporation
(Pursuant  to  NRS  78.385  and  78.390  After  Issuance  of  Stock)



1.  Name  of  Corporation
     New  Medium  Enterprises,  Inc.

2.  The  articles  have  been  amended  as  follows  (Provide article numbers if
available

     Article  FOURTH  of  the  hereby  amended  to  read  as  follows

    Fourth  (a)  The  corporation  shall  be  authorized  to issue the following
shares.

    Class          Number  of  Shares       Par  Value

Common             200,000,000              $0.0001
Preferred           10,000,000              $.0001

3.  The  voting  by  which  stockholders  holding  shares  in  the  corporation
entitling
them  to  exercise  at  least  a  majority  of  the voting power or such greater
proportion  of  the voting power as may be required in the case of a vote by the
classes  or  series  or  as may be required by the provisions of the Articles of
Incorporation  have  voted  in  favor  of  the  amendment  is  78%.

Effective  day  of  filing  7-26-04

Officers  Signature    Ethel  Schwartz

If  any  proposed amendment would alter or change any preference or any relative
or  other  right  given  to  any class or series of outstanding shares, then the
amendment  must  be  approved  by  the vote, in addition to the affirmative vote
otherwise  required  of  the  holders  of  shares representing a majority of the
voting  power  of  each  class or series affected by the amendment regardless of
limitations  or  restrictions  on  the  voting  power  thereof

IMPORTANT  Failure to include any of the above information and submit the proper
fees  may  cause  this  filing  to  be  rejected.


/s/  Nevada  Secretary  of  State
# C_2017239EN.01001201.xml

| 24.7.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 239/12 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.7.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 239/12

---

Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 11 May 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden — Netherlands) — The Shirtmakers BV v Staatssecretaris van Financiën

(Case C-59/16) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Customs union - Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 - Community Customs Code - Article 32(1)(e)(i) - Customs value - Transaction value - Determination - Concept of ‘cost of transport’))

(2017/C 239/15)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: The Shirtmakers BV

Applicant:

Defendant: Staatssecretaris van Financiën

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 32(1)(e)(i) of Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code must be interpreted as meaning that the concept of ‘cost of transport’, within the meaning of that provision, includes the supplement charged by the forwarding agent to the importer, corresponding to that agent’s profit margin and costs, in respect of the service which it provided in organising the transport of the imported goods to the customs territory of the European Union.

---

(1)  OJ C 145, 25.4.2016.

1

---
# C_2016059EN.01003301.xml

| 15.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 59/33 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 59/33

---

Action brought on 3 December 2015 — Othman v Council

(Case T-711/15)

(2016/C 059/37)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Razan Othman (Damascus, Syria) (represented by: E. Ruchat, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare the applicant’s action admissible and well founded; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare the applicant’s action admissible and well founded;

| — | as a consequence, order the European Union to repair all of the harm allegedly suffered by the applicant at an amount to be fixed equitably by the Court; |
| --- | --- |

—

as a consequence, order the European Union to repair all of the harm allegedly suffered by the applicant at an amount to be fixed equitably by the Court;

| — | order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law, alleging the fact that he has suffered non-material damage, consisting of harm to his reputation, as a direct causal link to the measures taken by the Council of the European Union, for which the Council is liable.

---
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 217 (Monday, November 13, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 77579]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-24913]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission


Combined Notice of Filings

    Take notice that the Commission has received the following Natural 
Gas Pipeline Rate and Refund Report filings:

Filings Instituting Proceedings

    Docket Numbers: RP24-145-000.
    Applicants: Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: List of Non-Conforming Service 
Agreements (McMullen, REA Intrm, Adelph) to be effective 12/7/2023.
    Filed Date: 11/6/23.
    Accession Number: 20231106-5047.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/20/23.

    Docket Numbers: RP24-146-000.
    Applicants: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LLC.
    Description: Sec.  4(d) Rate Filing: Amendment to Neg Rate Agmt 
(Santa Rosa 42487) to be effective 11/6/2023.
    Filed Date: 11/6/23.
    Accession Number: 20231106-5068.
    Comment Date: 5 p.m. ET 11/20/23.

    Any person desiring to intervene, to protest, or to answer a 
complaint in any of the above proceedings must file in accordance with 
Rules 211, 214, or 206 of the Commission's Regulations (18 CFR 385.211, 
385.214, or 385.206) on or before 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on the 
specified comment date. Protests may be considered, but intervention is 
necessary to become a party to the proceeding.
    The filings are accessible in the Commission's eLibrary system 
(https://elibrary.ferc.gov/idmws/search/fercgensearch.asp) by querying 
the docket number.
    eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing 
requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying 
facilities filings can be found at: http://www.ferc.gov/docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208-3676 
(toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502-8659.
    The Commission's Office of Public Participation (OPP) supports 
meaningful public engagement and participation in Commission 
proceedings. OPP can help members of the public, including landowners, 
environmental justice communities, Tribal members and others, access 
publicly available information and navigate Commission processes. For 
public inquiries and assistance with making filings such as 
interventions, comments, or requests for rehearing, the public is 
encouraged to contact OPP at (202) 502-6595 or <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#e8a7b8b8a88e8d9a8bc68f879e"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="19564949597f7c6b7a377e766f">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Dated: November 6, 2023.
Debbie-Anne A. Reese,
Deputy Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-24913 Filed 11-9-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
*Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except

under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 00-51202

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

GERARDO ANTONIO FLORES-DE LA CRUZ, also known as Jose Delaluz

Zubia,

Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

(EP-00-CR-798-ALL)

_________________________________________________________________

September 20, 2001

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, WIENER, and BARKSDALE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Gerardo Antonio Flores-De La Cruz

a/k/a Jose Delaluz Zubia has requested leave to withdraw as counsel

and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S.

738 (1967). Flores-De La Cruz has not filed a response. Our

independent review of the brief and the record discloses no

nonfrivolous issue. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to

withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED.
# 7600EZ Data

&"Calibri"&11&K000000NONCONFIDENTIAL // EXTERNAL&1#		

# Version

&"Calibri"&11&K000000NONCONFIDENTIAL // EXTERNAL&1#
EXHIBIT 32.2

Certification  Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

I,
J. David Darnell, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of INTAC International, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002 (the "Act") that to my knowledge on the date hereof:

|Dated: March 15, 2005 |  |                                                                                      
|--------------------- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|                      |  | /s/J. DAVID DARNELLJ. David Darnell
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

This
certification is being furnished solely for purposes of Section 906 of the Act, and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act of 1934,
or otherwise subject to the liability of that section.

---



QuickLinks
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-21-00492-CR

The STATE of Texas,

Appellant

v.

Michael David SEGURA,

Appellee

From the County Court at Law No. 13, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 605001

Honorable Rosie S. Gonzalez, Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARTINEZ, JUSTICE CHAPA, AND JUSTICE VALENZUELA

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is 

REVERSED, and the cause is REMANDED to the trial court for further proceedings consistent 

with this court’s opinion.

SIGNED July 20, 2022.

_____________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Chief Justice
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

              CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

      I, Scott D. Dorfman, Chief Executive Officer of Innotrac Corporation (the
"Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted by Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended
      June 30, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

Dated: August 13, 2004

                                    /s/ Scott D. Dorfman
                                    --------------------------------------------
                                    Scott D. Dorfman
                                    President, Chief Executive Officer and
                                    Chairman of the Board
## Contact Us

## Need Help

| **Need help right away?** |
|---------------------------|

| Coleen Haskell                        Program Manager                        208-387-5975chaskell@blm.gov						Molly Hunter                		                        Science Advisor						520-649-2914mhunter@blm.gov						Karen Dante-Wood                		                        Technology Transfer Specialist						208-387-5865sdantewood@blm.gov                        Becky Jenison                        Program Analyst                      208-387-5958bjenison@blm.govFooterThe BasicsFire Science InfoPartnersWhat is FireScience.gov?HomeContact UsAbout UsFire Science Exchange NetworkFundingResearchPublicationsNewslettersDisclaimer | Privacy Policy | FOIA | Accessibility
The Joint Fire Science Program funds scientific research on wildland fires and                 distributes results to help policymakers, fire managers and practitioners make sound                 decisions. More...
Release 1.02yPvXktXDQu0zM4nPrRmGb_zqnjuJy_QV5utRlBiEuM=.html |
|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
No. 61757.

#### E. Leitz, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 237354-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issues are the same in all material respects as those the subject of *John P. Herber & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(30 Cust. Ct. 193, C. D. 1519), the protests were dismissed, and the matters were remanded to a single judge sitting in reappraisement for determination of the value of the merchandise in the manner provided by law (28 U. S. C. § 2636 (d)).
**N.
        Blumenfrucht, CPA, PC.**
 1040
        East
        22 nd Street
 Brooklyn,
        NY 11210
 718-692-2743
 
 **CONSENT
        OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS**
 
 
 
 Board
        of
        Directors
 New
        Medium Enterprises, Inc.
 195
        The
        Vale
 London
        W3
        7QS
 
 We
        consent to the use of our report dated August 28, 2004, on page 17 of Form
        10-KSB/A of New Medium Enterprises, Inc. for the year ended June, 2004, included
        herein, and to the reference to our firm under the heading “Experts” in the
        prospectus. Our report dated August 24, 2004, contains an explanatory paragraph
        that states that the company has suffered recurring losses from operations,
        negative cash flow and has a net capital deficiency, which raises substantial
        doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated
        financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from
        the
        outcome of the uncertainty.
 
 
 /s/
        N.
        Blumenfrucht, CPA, PC.
 N.
        Blumenfrucht CPA PC
 
 CERTIFIED
        PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
 
 New
        York,
        NY
 June
        7,
        2006
Suite 800

1919 Pennsylvania Avenue NW

Washington, DC 20006-3401 

Paul Glist

202.973.4220 tel

202.973.4420 fax

paulglist@dwt.com

MEMORANDUM

Washington DC Office

To: expartecommunications@hq.doe.gov

From: Paul Glist

Date: October 2, 2013

Re: Docket No. EERE–2012–BT–TP–0046

Ex Parte Communication 

Department of Energy 

Meeting of October 1, 2013

This Memorandum for the Record provides a summary of an October 1, 2013, meeting 

with DOE officials concerning potential test procedures and energy conservation standards for 

set-top boxes. 

Meeting attendees:

Kathleen Hogan (DOE-Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy)

John Cymbalsky (DOE-Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy)

Jeremy Dommu (DOE-Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy) 

Daniel Cohen (DOE-Office of General Counsel)

Andrew deLaski (Appliance Standards Awareness Project) 

Ben Longstreth (Natural Resources Defense Council)

Noah Horowitz (Natural Resources Defense Council) (by phone) 

Jennifer Thorne Amann (American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy)

Neal Goldberg (National Cable & Telecommunications Association) 

Doug Johnson (Consumer Electronics Association) 

Paul Glist (Davis Wright Tremaine)

The parties discussed test procedures, standards, and coverage, and made reference to a 

proprietary document as the embodiment of a proposed approach.