alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE QUARTER ENDED MARCH 31, 1999 AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<CIK> 0001051353
<NAME> SOURCE ONE INCORPORATED

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                           6,336
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    2,567
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                      6,674
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 3,482
<PP&E>                                               0
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  19,059
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            3,359
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        11,292
<OTHER-SE>                                       4,408
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    19,059
<SALES>                                          3,006
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 3,006
<CGS>                                            3,319
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    3,319
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,612
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (3,925)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (3,925)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (3,925)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     .000
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     .000


</TABLE>
Exhibit 32



CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of TenFold Corporation (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2005 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Nancy M. Harvey, President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:



(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                                                               
|---------------------------------------------------------------
|                                                               
|/s/ Nancy M. Harvey                                            
|Nancy M. Harvey                                                
|President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer
|November 14, 2005
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS4652 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Bayou City Exploration, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Stephen C. Larkin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company





/s/ Stephen C. Larkin


Stephen C. Larkin


Chief Financial Officer





November 16, 2010
amendmenttoconsultingagr






29, DocuSign Envelope ID: 3A6530E7-66C4-4FC3-BA92-A489C5FF6F5C   Exhibit 10.21 





 






DocuSign Envelope ID: 3A6530E7-66C4-4FC3-BA92-A489C5FF6F5C
Before the Third Division,

June 21, 1944

No. 49549.

#### Protests 106906-K, etc., of T. D. Downing Co. et al. (Boston).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Exhibit 32.2

                     Certification pursuant to Section 1350
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
      --------------------------------------------------------------------


In  connection  with  the  Quarterly  Report  of  DA Consulting Group, Inc. (the
"COMPANY")  on  Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003, as filed with
the  Securities  and  Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "REPORT"), I,
Dennis  C.  Fairchild, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to  18 U.S.C. Sec.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act  of  2002,  that:

1)     the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of  the  Securities  Exchange  Act  of  1934,  as  amended;  and

2)     the  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects,  the  financial  condition  and  results of operations of the Company.





                                    /s/  Dennis  C.  Fairchild
               -----------------------------------------------
                                           Dennis  C.  Fairchild
                           Chief  Financial  Officer,  Secretary  and  Treasurer

                              (Principal  Financial  and  Accounting  Officer)
                                        Date:  November  14,  2003




A  signed  original  of  this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided  to  DA  Consulting  Group,  Inc. and will be retained by DA Consulting
Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff
upon  its  request.


<PAGE>
A89A1755.

#### EVANS v. GREEN et al.

(391 SE2d 11)

Beasley, Judge.

Evans appeals the dismissal of his complaint alleging violations of 42 USCA § 1983 against Warden Green, Lt. Gibbs, and Officers Milner, Butts, and Harrison, all members of the staif at the institution where Evans was incarcerated.

Evans alleged that he was subjected to slave labor in violation of the federal Eighth Amendment, discriminated against because of his race, and that he was beaten when he objected to receiving correspondence which was partially opened.

The court conducted a hearing pursuant to 28 USC § 1915 and issued a lengthy and detailed order dismissing the complaint as frivolous.

“Under 28 USCA § 1915 (d), a trial court may dismiss a case if it is ‘satisfied that the action is frivolous or malicious.’ The dismissal of a frivolous action is appropriate to prevent an abuse of process. *Brown v. Pena,*441 FSupp. 1382 (S. D. Fla. 1977), aff’d without opinion, 589 F2d 1113 (5th Cir. 1979). ‘(T)he standard for determining the legal sufficiency of a complaint is the same under either Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 or 28 USC § 1915 (d). (Cits).’ *Spears v. McCotter,*766 F2d 179, 182 (5th Cir. 1985). Therefore, the dismissal of a lawsuit as frivolous is appropriate where the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12. Cf. *Estelle v. Gamble,*429 U. S. 97, 106 (97 SC 285, 50 LE2d 251) (1976).” *Brown v. Diaz,*184 Ga. App. 409, 410 (3) (361 SE2d 490) (1987).

The hearing on Evans’ complaint was not taken down. Under these circumstances, we assume that the trial court’s findings and rulings arising therefrom were appropriate. *Baugh v. Robinson,*179 Ga. App. 571, 572 (346 SE2d 918) (1986); *Gaskins v. Fowler,*171 Ga. App. 681, 682 (2) (320 SE2d 890) (1984); *York v. Miller,*168 Ga. App. 849, *395850 (310 SE2d 577) (1983).

Decided February 5, 1990.

William Evans, *pro se.*

*Michael J. Bowers, Attorney General, William B. Hill, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, Daryl A. Robinson, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Neal B. Childers, Assistant Attorney General,*for appellees.

The only claim of Evans arguably supported by factual allegations involved his alleged beating after complaining that a letter had been partially opened. The court’s order reflects that Evans and his witness were not credible on this issue. This was an appropriate task for the court in determining the § 1915 issue. *Harris v. Menendez,*817 F2d 737 (11th Cir. 1987). We are bound by this determination absent an abuse of discretion and we find none. Ibid.

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Carley, C. J., and McMurray, P. J., concur.*
Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT  TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I,
Douglas M. Schirle, certify that:

1.     I
have reviewed this annual report on Form 10K of GSI Technology, Inc.;

2.     Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.     Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:



5.     The
registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's
auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):



Date:
June 17, 2008

|/s/DOUGLAS M. SCHIRLEDouglas M. Schirle Chief Financial
Officer |  | 
|--------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---



QuickLinks
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 18-6459

DANIEL ERIC SALLEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, 

at Martinsburg. Gina M. Groh, Chief District Judge. (3:15-cv-00143-GMG-MJA)

Submitted: August 16, 2018 Decided: August 21, 2018

Amended: April 3, 2019

Before WYNN and DIAZ, Circuit Judges, and SHEDD, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Daniel Eric Salley, Appellant Pro Se. 

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Daniel Eric Salley appeals the district court’s order accepting the magistrate 

judge’s recommendation to dismiss Salley’s claims, which were brought pursuant to the 

Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b)(1) (2012). As to the claim about which 

Salley failed to object to the bases for the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss, 

Salley has waived appellate review of the district court’s decision to adopt the 

recommendation. See Wright v. Collins, 766 F.2d 841, 845-46 (4th Cir. 1985); see also

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985). As to those claims regarding which Salley properly 

objected, we have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. We thus affirm the 

district court’s order. See Salley v. United States, No. 3:15-cv-00143-GMG-MJA

(N.D.W. Va. Apr. 10, 2018). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal 

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument 

would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
PROMISSORY NOTE
                                 ---------------


To:     ZENNIE MORRIS                          Principal Amount:  USD $20,000.00
        (the "Creditor")                        Expiry Date:  September 30, 2004
        Providenciales
        Turks  &  Caicos  Islands,  B.W.I.


FOR  VALUE  RECEIVED,  SECOND  STAGE  VENTURES,  INC. (the "Debtor") does hereby
promise  to  pay  to, or to the order of, the Creditor, the principal sum of USD
$20,000.00  on  or  before  September  30,  2004,  without  interest.

The  Debtor  hereby waives presentment, protest, notice of protest and notice of
dishonor.

This  note  is  not  assignable.

Payments  made  or  notices  given  by a party hereto must be given to the other
party  at  its  address appearing above (or such other address as that party may
have  provided  in  writing).

Dated  effective  as  of  the  20th  day  of  October,  2003.


THE  CORPORATE  SEAL  OF  SECOND  STAGE    )
VENTURES, INC. was hereunto affixed in the )
Presence  of:                              )
                                           )
                                           )
---------------------------------------    )
Authorized  Signatory                      )
                                           )
                                           )
---------------------------------------    )
Authorized  Signatory                      )


<PAGE>
Exhibit 32.1

Statement of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code

 

Pursuant to Section 1350 of Title 18 of the United States Code, I, Darwin L. Stump, the Chief Financial Officer of Petroleum Development Corporation, Managing General Partner of the Registrant, hereby certify that: 

- I have reviewed the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Registrant (the "Report") to which this statement is an Exhibit;
- the Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
- the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Registrant.

 

_/s/ Darwin L. Stump                  

Darwin L. Stump

Chief Financial Officer of the 

Managing General Partner of the Registrant

___March 25,  2004_________
Do Not Pay Quick Reference Card

Getting Started

Overview of the CAIA Implementation

The Bureau of the Fiscal Service (Fiscal Service) 

implemented the Common Approach to Identity 

Assurance (CAIA) as a credentialing provider for 

many of its applications. CAIA enables federated 

applications to accept user credentials from external 

Credential Service Providers (CSP). CAIA allows for 

three different methods of identity authentication for 

the Do Not Pay (DNP) Portal: 1) Personal Identity 

Verification (PIV) Card/Common Access Card (CAC)/

LincPass card; 2) ID.me; and 3) Login.gov.

Impacts to the DNP Portal User Experience for 

PIV/CAC/LincPass Card Users

On March 25, 2023, Fiscal Service implemented CAIA 

to log in to the DNP Portal, replacing the IBM Security 

Identity Manager (ISIM). Users who have access to a 

PIV/CAC/LincPass card will log into the Portal using 

their card and PIN.

First-Time Login Process: If it is your first time logging 

in to the Portal with your PIV/CAC/LincPass card, you 

will be directed to a one-time email verification 

screen. Enter your work email address that was used 

to enroll into the Portal on your User Enrollment 

Form. A verification code will be sent to that email. 

Enter that verification code and click [Submit] to 

access the Portal.

Support Resources

Agency Support 

For questions regarding Portal access, contact the 

DNP Agency Support Center at 855-837-4391, or by 

email at donotpay@stls.frb.org. 

For general inquiries about DNP or OPI, please 

contact your Agency Lead and Agency Specialist, or 

email OPI.outreach@fiscal.treasury.gov. 

Step 1: Login using PIV/CAC button

Step 2: Select your certificate

Step 3: Enter your PIN

Email verification screen

FAQ’s

If I am already enrolled as a Portal User, what action 

do I need to take?

No further action is required for current Portal Users. 

Proceed to log in to the Portal using the “PIV/CAC” button.

Do I need to make an account with Login.gov or 

ID.me?

No. If you have access to a PIV/CAC/LincPass card, you do 

not have to create an account with Login.gov or ID.me. 

You will log in to the Portal by choosing the PIV / CAC 

button on the login page.

Does the DNP Portal have Aging Rules?

Yes. If a user does not log in once every 120 days, the 

Aging Rules will deactivate the user, revoking DNP Portal 

access immediately. The Aging Rules will be activated as 

soon as users have been provisioned access to the DNP 

Portal.

If a user is deactivated, a new DNP User Enrollment Form 

must be completed and signed by the Access Group 

Administrator (AGA) for the user to regain access to the 

DNP Portal. The process to reprovision access can take up 

to seven days. 

Users will receive warning emails to notify them that they 

are at risk of being deactivated due to inactivity. They will 

receive five notification emails, the earliest being fourteen 

days before access is removed.

Set a recurring reminder on your 

calendar to log in to the Portal every 

90 –100 days to avoid Portal 

disruption after 120 days of no login 

activity.
# C_2015089EN.01004101.xml

| 16.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 89/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

16.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 89/41

---

Action brought on 23 January 2015 — Abertis Telecom Terrestre v Commission

(Case T-37/15)

(2015/C 089/49)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Abertis Telecom Terrestre, SA (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: J. Buendía Sierra, A. Lamadrid de Pablo, A. Balcells Cartagena and M. Bolsa Ferruz, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision and, in particular, Article 1 of the decision in so far as it declares the existence of State aid incompatible with the internal market; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision and, in particular, Article 1 of the decision in so far as it declares the existence of State aid incompatible with the internal market;

| — | consequently, annul the orders for the recovery of that aid set out in Articles 3 and 4 of the decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

consequently, annul the orders for the recovery of that aid set out in Articles 3 and 4 of the decision;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs of these proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs of these proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main supporting arguments are those set out in Case T-36/15, Hispasat v Commission.

---
Exhibit 4

                                   AGREEMENT


Agreement  by and  between  DCP  Limited  (a  NEVADA  Limited  Liability  Corp.)
(hereinafter  sometimes  referred  to as  "Seller")  and Make  Your  Move,  Inc.
(hereinafter sometimes referred to as "Buyer").

WHEREAS,  the  management  of Seller and Buyer deem it advisable  for the mutual
benefit of Seller  and Buyer and their  respective  shareholders  that the Asset
Purchase  Agreement  between the parties  dated and  effective  June 30, 2001 is
hereby rescinded and void.

It is mutually  agreed that no purchase  took place and all parties are returned
to their position before the agreement was entered into.

IN WITNESS  WHEREOF,  the parties  have  executed  this  Agreement by their duly
authorized officers as of the 30th day of June, 2001.

                                  BUYER:  Make Your Move, Inc.



                                   By: /s/ Henry L. Rolling
                                   -----------------------------
                                   Henry L. Rolling, President


                                   SELLER:  DCP Limited

                                   By: /s/ Henry Rolling
                                   -----------------------------
                                   Henry Rolling, Majority Member


/s/ Rick Gillespie
-----------------------
Rick Gillespie


/s/ Luther Mack                               /s/ Leslie O'Neal
-----------------------                       ------------------------
Luther Mack                                   Leslie O'Neal



/s/ Henry L. Rolling                          /s/ Kristin Rolling
-----------------------                       ------------------------
Henry L. Rolling                              Kristin Rolling


                                       1
<PAGE>