alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.2**

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TOSECTION 302**

**OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACTOF 2002**

 

I, AmandaJ. Bokman, certify that:

 

1.             I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A ofJ. Crew Group, Inc., J. Crew Intermediate LLC and J. Crew Operating Corp.;

 

2.             Basedon my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statementsmade, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

 

3              Basedon my knowledge, the financial statements and other financial informationincluded in this report fairly present in all material respects the financialcondition, results of operations and cash flows of each registrant as of, andfor, the periods presented in this report;

 

4.             Eachregistrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishingand maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for such registrant and have:

 

a)             Designedsuch disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to such registrant, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularlyduring the period in which this report is being prepared;

 

b)            Evaluatedthe effectiveness of such registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation; and

 

c)             Disclosedin this report any change in such registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (theregistrant’s fourth fiscal year in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, such registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting; and

 

5.             Eachregistrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to suchregistrant’s auditors and the audit committee of such registrant’s board ofdirectors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

 

a)             All significant deficiencies andmaterial weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect suchregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and

 

b)            Anyfraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in such registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.

 
| Dated: October 22, 2004    |
|----------------------------|
|                       |
| /s/ Amanda J. Bokman  |   |
| Amanda J. Bokman           |
| Chief Financial Officer    |

 

 

 

 

----
Before the Third Division,

October 8, 1957

No. 61244.

protest 293247-K (Los Angeles).

#### Atalanta Products Corp. *v.*United States,

*451Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial, it was stipulated that the merchandise consists of boned ham, hermetically sealed, packed in gelatinous pickling solution; that the net weight is the assessed weight, less 10 percent, the maximum weight being 10 percent less than the assessed weight; and that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that the subject of *Axel Stokby et al.*v. *United States*(4 Cust. Ct. 343, C. D. 358). On the record presented and following the decision cited, the merchandise was held dutiable at *3}{*cents per pound under paragraph 703, Tariff Act of 1930, upon the basis of the assessed weight, less an allowance for gelatinous pickling solution equal to 10 percent of the assessed weight.
For copies of The Mercury from Oct 1973 to Mar 2014 go to: http://stimson.contentdm.oclc.org/cdm/landingpage/collection/p16379coll1.
November 13, 1959

No. 63532.

protests 143434-K/1752, etc.

#### International Expediters, Inc. *v.*United States,

Plaintiff’s application for rehearing granted.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the EnergySouth, Inc. (the "Company") Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John S.
Davis, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

         1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

Date:  May 15, 2003                                   By: /s/ John S. Davis
                                                          ----------------------
                                                              John S. Davis
                                                              President and
                                                         Chief Executive Officer

                                       27
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           2,351
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    4,494
<ALLOWANCES>                                       459
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 7,606
<PP&E>                                         164,152
<DEPRECIATION>                                  42,776
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 134,571
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           11,224
<BONDS>                                        130,065
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                    (21,450)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   134,571
<SALES>                                          8,850
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 9,049
<CGS>                                            3,809
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    8,068
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,805
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,824)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,071)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,753)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,753)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.64)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.64)


</TABLE>
You are here: EPA Home ECOTOX 

 

 

 

Welcome to ECOTOX Release 4.0. The

ECOTOX (ECOTOXicology) database 

provides single chemical toxicity 

information for aquatic and 

terrestrial life.

For information on the latest data 

releases please see the Recent Additions.

View the Quick User Guide (PDF, 2 p. 244 

KB) to help get you started. 

You will need to turn off pop-up 

blockers for this site.

You should consult the original 

scientific paper to ensure an 

understanding of the context of the 

data retrieved from the ECOTOX 

database.

NHEERL / Mid-Continent 

Ecology Division 

 Other Tools & Databases

ASTER 

BSAF data set 

Eco-SSL documents 

Fathead Minnow data set 

PCB Residue Effects data 

set 

Toxicity/Residue 

ECOTOX Database

http://cfpub.epa.gov/ecotox/ecotox_home.cfm

Last updated on Monday, May 24, 2010

ECOTOX | MED | US EPA Page 1 of 1

http://cfpub.epa.gov/ecotox/ecotox_home.cfm 5/24/2010
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

: CIVIL ACTION NOS.

:

WILSON : 02-3878

RETES : 02-3888

LUX, et al. : 02-3904

JACKSON, et al. : 02-3921

GUZZETTA, et al. : 02-3960

FAGAN, et al. : 02-3965

GREEN : 02-3989

NELSON, et al. : 02-4120

ASHTON, et al. : 02-4155

MCNALLY, et al : 02-4159

EVERETT, et al. : 02-4191

CASTELAZ, et al. : 02-4192

PERRY : 02-4249

NAPIER, et al. : 02-4256

POWERS, et al. : 02-4260

SANTOS, et al. : 02-4272

PRICE : 02-4299

SHULDA : 02-4307

:

VS. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION, et al. :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of July, 2002, the Court having been previously

advised that the above action cannot proceed to trial and disposition because of the following

reason:

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending disposition of a related

action.

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending determination of

arbitration proceedings.

[ ] - Interlocutory appeal filed.

Case 2:02-cv-04256-HH Document 2 Filed 07/10/2002 Page 1 of 2
[ X ] - Other: Case is placed into suspense pending receipt of the Case

Transfer Order from the Judicial Panel on Multi District Litigation

transferring case to District of Minnesota.

It is

ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this action closed for statistical purposes and

place the matter in the Civil Suspense File, and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction; and that the case be

restored to the trial docket when the action is in a status so that it may proceed to final

disposition; this order shall not prejudice the rights of the parties to this litigation.

BY THE COURT:

________________________________________

Herbert J. Hutton, Judge

Case 2:02-cv-04256-HH Document 2 Filed 07/10/2002 Page 2 of 2
Case No. 6,668.

#### HOOE v. REES.

[Cited in Hellrigle v. Dulany, Case No. 6,-343. Nowhere reported; opinion not now accessible.]
Case 2:04-cr-00390-GEKP Document 202 Filed 09/28/22 Page 1 of 5
Case 2:04-cr-00390-GEKP Document 202 Filed 09/28/22 Page 2 of 5
Case 2:04-cr-00390-GEKP Document 202 Filed 09/28/22 Page 3 of 5
Case 2:04-cr-00390-GEKP Document 202 Filed 09/28/22 Page 4 of 5
Case 2:04-cr-00390-GEKP Document 202 Filed 09/28/22 Page 5 of 5
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

SECTION 302 OF THE

SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, Jesse Whittenton, Chief Financial and Executive Officer, certify that:



1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-ksb of AutoFund Servicing, Inc.;



1.

Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;



2.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;



3.

I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:



a.

designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;



b.

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and



c.

presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;



4.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):



a.

all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and



b.

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls;



5.

The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.



Date: February 16, 2004



By:

/s/ Jesse Whittenton







Jesse Whittenton
Chief Financial and

Executive Officer
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

GIUSETTE DELLOLIO :

: CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-CV-4141

Plaintiff, :

:

v. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION;

BAYER AG;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE;

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM

:

:

:

:

:

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

:

Defendants. :

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of the Court:

Kindly enter the appearances of Hope S. Freiwald, Aline Fairweather, Erin

Brennan and Kirstin J. Miller as attorneys for defendant SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a

GlaxoSmithKline.

Respectfully Submitted,

_____________________________ _____________________________

Hope S. Freiwald Aline Fairweather

_____________________________ _____________________________

Erin Brennan Kirstin J. Miller

DECHERT PRICE & RHOADS

4000 Bell Atlantic Tower

1717 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2793

(215) 994-4000

Case 2:02-cv-04141-CG Document 8 Filed 09/20/2002 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JOHN J. KORESKO, V, et al.

v.

JEFF BLEIWEIS, et al.

: CIVIL ACTION 

:

: NO. 04-769

:

:

ORDER

AND NOW, this 7TH day of October, 2008, having ascertained from the record in

the above-captioned matter that no proceeding has been docketed therein for a period of more

than ONE (1) YEAR as of this date, Plaintiffs are notified that this action shall be dismissed

pursuant to Rule 41.1(a) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure unless they file a written

application within THIRTY (30) DAYS from the date of this Order. In the absence of such

application or further Order by the Court, the Clerk shall, without special Order, enter upon the

record “Dismissed with prejudice under Local Rule 41.1(a),” and shall, upon application by

Defendants, tax costs against Plaintiffs.

BY THE COURT:

 S/ BRUCE W. KAUFFMAN 

BRUCE W. KAUFFMAN, J.
Before the Second Division,

October 8, 1957

No. 61242.

protest 226995-K (San Francisco).

#### Air Express International Agency and Barclay Clover, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of wearing apparel, wholly or in chief value of silk, similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. *The Specialty House, Inc., Bryant & Heffernan, Inc., et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 136, C. A. D. 585), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
August 18, 1948

No. 52514.

protest 132182-K.

#### The Von Hamm Young Co., Ltd., dba Hotel Import Co. *v.*United States,

Plaintiff’s application for rehearing granted.
# C_2017374EN.01000501.xml

| 6.11.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 374/5 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

6.11.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 374/5

---

Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 7 September 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Conseil d'État — France) — Eqiom SAS, formerly Holcim France SAS, Enka SA v Ministre des Finances et des Comptes publics

(Case C-6/16) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Direct taxation - Freedom of establishment - Free movement of capital - Withholding tax - Directive 90/435/EEC - Article 1(2) - Article 5(1) - Exemption - Dividends distributed by a resident subsidiary to a non-resident parent company controlled directly or indirectly by one or more residents of third States - Presumption - Fraud, tax evasion and abuse))

(2017/C 374/06)

Language of the case: French

Referring court

Referring court

Conseil d'État

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Eqiom SAS, formerly Holcim France SAS, Enka SA

Applicants:

Defendant: Ministre des Finances et des Comptes publics

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 1(2) of Council Directive 90/435/EEC of 23 July 1990 on the common system of taxation applicable in the case of parent companies and subsidiaries of different Member States, as amended by Council Directive 2003/123/EC of 22 December 2003, first, and Article 49 TFEU, secondly, must be interpreted as precluding national tax legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which subjects the grant of the tax advantage provided for by Article 5(1) of that directive — namely, the exemption from withholding tax of profits distributed by a resident subsidiary to a non-resident parent company, where that parent company is directly or indirectly controlled by one or more residents of third States — to the condition that that parent company establish that the principal purpose or one of the principal purposes of the chain of interests is not to take advantage of that exemption.

---

(1)  OJ C 106, 21.3.2016.

1

---
Before the Second Division,

March 18, 1954

No. 57921.

protests 160567-K, etc. (New York).

#### Chase Bottle & Supply Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of powder filling machines and parts thereof, the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Yardley of London, Inc.*v. *United States*(30 Cust. Ct. 37, C. D. 1495), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION I, John S. Davis, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of EnergySouth, Inc. (the Registrant); 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this quarterly report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly
report; 4. The Registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and
procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to
the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrants disclosure controls and procedures and
presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure
controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report based on such
evaluation; and (c) Disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the Registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Registrants most recent fiscal quarter that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrants internal
control over financial reporting; 5. The Registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrants auditors and the audit
committee of the Registrants board of directors: (a) All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal control over financial
reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrants ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
significant role in the Registrants internal control over financial reporting. Date: May 9, 2005
    /s/ John S. DavisJohn S. DavisPresident and Chief Executive Officer
No. 52901.

#### P. R. Dreyer, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 128897-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of mandarin oil the same in all material respects as that the subject of *Fritzsche Bros., Inc.*v. *United States*(21 Cust. Ct. 90, C. D. 1134), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.