alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Before the Second Division,

July 19, 1950

No. 54548.

#### B. R. Anderson & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 69136-K, etc. (Seattle and San Francisco).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

The protests were dismissed.
No. 50345.

#### Protests 100677-K, etc., of Thompson Mahogany Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of mahogany lumber, planed on one side by so-called “hit-and-miss” planing, the same in all material respects as that the subject of *Thompson Mahogany Co.*v. *United States*(13 Cust. Ct. 204, C. D. 894). In accordance therewith it was held that the merchandise is entitled to free entry under paragraph 1803, but is subject to the internal revenue tax assessed.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 687 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 687

  Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that Federal, 
  State, and local taxes, fees, regulations, and permitting policies 
   should be coordinated and reconciled to maximize the benefits of 
                         broadband investment.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 11, 2018

Mr. Bilirakis submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 
the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee 
 on Ways and Means, for a period to be subsequently determined by the 
  Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall 
           within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that Federal, 
  State, and local taxes, fees, regulations, and permitting policies 
   should be coordinated and reconciled to maximize the benefits of 
                         broadband investment.

Whereas universal service is the principle that all Americans should have access 
        to communications services;
Whereas universal service is a cornerstone of United States policy;
Whereas the United States has a federal system of government;
Whereas the 10th Amendment to the Constitution guarantees States' rights;
Whereas all levels of government have an interest in supporting the deployment 
        of broadband internet access;
Whereas certain other countries do not have divisions of government that protect 
        state and local rights, and such countries are actively trying to take 
        the lead in deploying advanced communications networks; and
Whereas history shows countries with the best communications have the highest 
        economic growth: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That it is the sense of the House of Representatives that 
Federal, State, and local taxes, fees, regulations, and permitting 
policies should be coordinated and reconciled to maximize the benefits 
of broadband investment.
                                 <all>
```
Before the First Division,

September 20, 1957

No. 61207.

protest 299542-K (New York).

#### Dan Brechner & Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of celluloid figures similar in all material respects to those the subject of *M. Pressner & Co.*v. *United States*(24 Cust. Ct. 77, C. D. 1211), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# C_2015107EN.01003702.xml

| 30.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 107/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 107/37

---

Action brought on 9 February 2015 — Shoe Branding Europe v OHIM (Parallel stripes)

(Case T-63/15)

(2015/C 107/49)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Shoe Branding Europe BVBA (Oudenaarde, Belgium) (represented by: J. Løje, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark (representation of two parallel stripes) — Application for registration No 10 926 764

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 December 2014 in Case R 2560/2013-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Plea(s) in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
Before the Third Division,

October 14, 1954

No. 58426.

protest 170262-K (Duluth).

#### Norman G. Jensen, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

From the official papers, it appeared that the protest was filed more than 60 days after liquidation. The court took judicial notice, however, that the 60th day fell on a Saturday. *(Virginia Bridge & Iron Co.*v. *Camp,*11 F. (2d) 589.) Accordingly, following *Hawaiian Oke & Liquors, Ltd.*v. *United Slates*(28 Cust. Ct. 58, C. D. 1388), it was held that the protest is timely. In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of frozen beef lungs similar in all material respects to those the subject of *A. N. Deringer, Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(32 Cust. Ct. 41, C. D. 1578), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# C_2016059EN.01003401.xml

| 15.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 59/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 59/34

---

Action brought on 2 December 2015 — Makhlouf v Council

(Case T-714/15)

(2016/C 059/39)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Rami Makhlouf (Damascus, Syria) (represented by: E. Ruchat, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare the applicant’s action admissible and well founded; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare the applicant’s action admissible and well founded;

| — | as a consequence, order the European Union to repair all of the harm allegedly suffered by the applicant at an amount to be fixed equitably by the Court; |
| --- | --- |

—

as a consequence, order the European Union to repair all of the harm allegedly suffered by the applicant at an amount to be fixed equitably by the Court;

| — | order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law, alleging the fact that he has suffered non-material damage, consisting of harm to his reputation, as a direct causal link to the measures taken by the Council of the European Union, for which the Council is liable.

---
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>

<ARTICLE>   BD
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE HOENIG
GROUP INC. FORM 10-Q FOR THE PERIODS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED
IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES THERETO.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                                              <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                        DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                             SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                    16,771,346
<RECEIVABLES>                             12,689,642
<SECURITIES-RESALE>                                0
<SECURITIES-BORROWED>                              0
<INSTRUMENTS-OWNED>                       24,534,578
<PP&E>                                     1,836,579
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            62,761,021
<SHORT-TERM>                                  29,097
<PAYABLES>                                 4,569,040
<REPOS-SOLD>                                       0
<SECURITIES-LOANED>                                0
<INSTRUMENTS-SOLD>                                 0
<LONG-TERM>                                        0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                     108,389
<OTHER-SE>                                37,961,700
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>              62,761,021
<TRADING-REVENUE>                                  0
<INTEREST-DIVIDENDS>                       1,353,422
<COMMISSIONS>                             55,480,358
<INVESTMENT-BANKING-REVENUES>                      0
<FEE-REVENUE>                              5,727,181
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 0
<COMPENSATION>                            16,127,820
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            6,049,957
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                               3,294,276
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                    .37
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    .35
        


</TABLE>
No. 63558.

protests 59/3, etc. (New York).

#### Crown Crystal Importing Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

The protests were dismissed.
Before the Second Division,

March 6, 1947

No. 51599.

#### Protests 490559-G, etc., of Lord & Taylor (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). In accordance therewith the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998             DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-1998             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1998             SEP-30-1998
<CASH>                                             676                     676
<SECURITIES>                                         0                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0                       0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0                       0
<INVENTORY>                                     27,223                  27,223
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                28,270                  28,270
<PP&E>                                           5,369                   5,369
<DEPRECIATION>                                   2,253                   2,253
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  32,013                  32,013
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           14,798                  14,798
<BONDS>                                              0                       0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                          0                       0
<COMMON>                                             7                       7
<OTHER-SE>                                      16,137                  16,137
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    32,013                  32,013
<SALES>                                         14,638                  39,476
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                14,638                  39,476
<CGS>                                            9,258                  25,491
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    9,258                  25,491
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 3,980                  10,617
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 100                     268
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,300                   3,100
<INCOME-TAX>                                       500                   1,077
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                800                   2,023
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                       800                   2,023
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .12                     .29
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .12                     .29
        

</TABLE>
No. 64731.

#### H. Rosenhirsch Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 59/33046 (New York).

*326Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of synthetic filaments similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Empire Brushes, Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(42 Cust. Ct. 145, C.D. 2078), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Before the Second Division,

April 24, 1962

No. 66704.

#### National Carloading Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 58/15861-10086 (Chicago).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of percussion hammers similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Arthur Salm, Inc.*v. *United States*(46 Cust. Ct. 68, C.D. 2235), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 51579.

#### Protests 520495-G, etc., of Larry Lasker Co. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MARIA T. RAMOS

Plaintiff,

v.

JO ANNE B. BARNHART, et al.

Defendants.

Civil Action No. 04-0875

ORDER

AND NOW, this 27 day of September, 2005 upon consideration of the parties’ crossMotions for Summary Judgment, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of M.

Faith Angell, United State Magistrate Judge, it is hereby ORDERED that: 

1. The Report and Recommendation is APPROVED and ADOPTED.

2. The Defendant Commissioner’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.

3. The Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED.

BY THE COURT:

 __________________________________

LOUIS H. POLLAK, J.

Case 2:04-cv-00875-LP Document 24 Filed 09/28/05 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1












CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the Annual Report of Shoshone Silver/Gold Mining Company(the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2013, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “report”), I, Howard Crosby, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:




(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated this 11th  day of April, 2014.






HOWARD CROSBY ___________________________Howard CrosbyChief Executive Officer
No. 57925.

protests 107416-K, etc. (Laredo).

#### F. G. Jackson et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of mixed feeds similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Southwestern Sugar & Molasses Co.*v. *United States*(18 Cust. Ct. 128, C. D. 1056) and *Pioneer Transfer Co.*v. *United States*(30 Cust. Ct. 101, C. D. 1504), the claims of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 66243.

#### Illfelder Importing Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 61/264 (New York).

Opinion by

Olivee, O. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of tin horns similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 47002, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. P68/184.

protests 64/12056, etc. (New York).

#### S. Hiller & Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Beckworti-i, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” covered by the foregoing protests consist of battery-operated horns similar in all material respects to those the subject of *S. Hitler & Co. et al.*v. *United States*(59 Cust. Ct. 79, C.D. 3082) and that the items of merchandise marked “C” covered by the foregoing protests consist of rubber bulb horns similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Sherwin*International, *Inc.*v. *United States*(54 Cust. Ct. 466, Abstract 69382), the claims of the plaintiffs were sustained.
THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13-20-00428-CR

TREY WAYNE FRICKS

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the

24th District Court of Refugio County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 2019-08-6221

JUDGMENT

THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on 

appeal, concludes the judgment of the trial court should be reversed and rendered. The 

Court orders the judgment of the trial court REVERSED and RENDERED.

We further order this decision certified below for observance.

May 26, 2022
# C_2015107EN.01003701.xml

| 30.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 107/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 107/37

---

Action brought on 4 February 2015 — Market Watch v OHIM — El Corte Inglés (MITOCHRON)

(Case T-62/15)

(2015/C 107/48)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Market Watch Franchise & Consulting, Inc. (Freeport, Bahamas) (represented by: J. Korab, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: El Corte Inglés, SA (Madrid, Spain)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Applicant: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘MITOCHRON’ — Application for registration No 11 200 078

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 19 November 2014 in Case R 508/2014-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Admit the complaint; |
| --- | --- |

—

Admit the complaint;

| — | Annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the contested decision;

| — | Order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM to pay the costs.

Plea in law

| — | Inexistence of a risk of confusion between the trade marks involved in the dispute. |
| --- | --- |

—

Inexistence of a risk of confusion between the trade marks involved in the dispute.

---
Affirmed; Opinion Filed February 5, 2018.

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05
- 17
- 00815
- CR MATTHEW ST. CLAIR , Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS , Appellee
On Appeal from the 271st District Court

Wise County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CR18377 

### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bridges, Myers, and Schenck Opinion by Justice Myers Matthew St. Clair waived a jury trial and pleaded guilty to two counts of aggravat ed sexual assault of a child younger than fourteen years. After finding appellant guilty of both counts, t he trial court assessed punishment at twelve years’ imprisonment for each count, to run concurrently

. Although originally filed in the Second Court of Appeals, the appeal was tran sferred to this Court on July 14 , 2017 by the Texas Supreme Court pursuant to a docket equalization order. T EX
. G OV

. C ODE A NN
. § 73.001 (West 2013). On appeal, appellant’s attorney filed a brief in which he concludes the appeal is wholly frivolous and without merit. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967). The brief presents a professional evaluation of the record showing why, in effect, there are no arguable grounds to advance. See High v. State , 573 S.W.2d 807, 81 2 (Tex. Crim.– 2

–

App. [Panel Op.] 1978) (determining whether brief meets requirements of Anders ) . Counsel delivered a copy of the brief to appellant. We advised appellant of his right to file a pro se response , but he did not file a pro se response. See Kelly v. State , 436 S.W.3d 313, 319

– 21 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014) ( noting appellant has right to file pro se response to Anders brief filed by counsel). We have reviewed the record and counsel’s brief. See Bledso e v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824,
82 6

– 2 7 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (explaining appellate court’s duty in Anders cases). We agree the appeal is frivolous and without merit. We find nothing in the record that might arguably support the appeal.
We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

/Lana Myers/ LANA MYERS JUSTICE
Do Not Publish T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 47 170815F.U05– 3

– 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

JUDGMENT
MATTHEW ST. CLAIR, Appellant
No. 05

- 17

- 00815

- CR V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 271st District Court, Wise County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CR18377. Opinion delivered by Justice Myers. Justices Bridges and Schenck participating. Based on the Court’s opinion of this date, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED

. Judgment entered this 5th day of February, 2018.
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM



         We  consent  to the  incorporation  by  reference  in the  Registration
Statement (No. 333-97399) on Form S-8 of BUCS Financial Corp of our report dated
March 14, 2006,  relating to the  consolidated  balance sheets of BUCS Financial
Corp as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and the related  consolidated  statements
of operations, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows for the years then
ended,  which  report  appears in the  December  31, 2005 annual  report on Form
10-KSB of BUCS Financial Corp.


                                               /s/ Stegman & Company



Baltimore, Maryland
March 29, 2006
# C_2017144EN.01001301.xml

| 8.5.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 144/13 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.5.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 144/13

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 9 March 2017 — Poland v European Commission

(Case C-105/16 P) (1)

1

((Appeal - EAGGF and EAFRD - Expenditure excluded from EU financing - Rural Development - Regulation (EC) No 1257/1999 - Article 33b - Support for semi-subsistence farms undergoing restructuring - Obligation to spend at least 50 % of the support on restructuring operations))

(2017/C 144/17)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Republic of Poland (represented by: B. Majczyna, acting as Agent)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Commission (represented by: A. Stobiecka-Kuik and J. Aquilina, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

| 1. | Dismisses the appeal; |
| --- | --- |

1.

Dismisses the appeal;

| 2. | Orders the Republic of Poland to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Orders the Republic of Poland to pay the costs.

---

(1)  OJ C 136, 18.4.2016.

1

---