2006 D e c i sion s O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit 2-8-2006 

# Hines v . U SA P r e c e de nt i al or N on-P r e c e de nt i al : N on-P r e c e de nt i al D ocke t N o . 05-4055

F o llow thi s and a dd it ion al work s at : http://d i git alc ommon s .l a w . vi ll anova . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2006

Thi s de c i sion i s br ou ght t o you for f r e e and ope n a c c e s s b y the O p inion s of the U nit e d S t at e s C our t of Appe al s for the Thir d C ir c uit at V i ll anova U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Reposit ory

. It h as be e n a c c ept e d for inclusion in 2006 D e c i sion s b y an authori z e d a dmini s tr at or of V i ll anova U nive r sity S choo l of L a

w Di git al Reposit ory

. F or mor e inform at ion, p le as e c ont a ct Be n j amin . C arl s on@l a

w . vi ll anova . e du . Re c omme nde d C it at ion " Hine s v . U SA" (2006). 2006 D e cisio n s . P ape r 1618. http://d i git alc ommon s .l a

w . vi ll anova . e du/thir dc ir c uit_2006/1618DP S - 7 3 NOT P RE CE DE NT I AL UN I TED STATES CO UR T OF A PP EALS F O R T H E T H IR D C IR C U IT N O . 05- 4055

________________ SH A W N R. H I N ES, A ppel l ant

v. UN I TED STATES OF A M ERI CA ; FEDERA L B U R E A U O F IN V E S T IG A T IO N ; JO H N D O E ; J A N E D O E ; A B C C O R P. ; X Y Z C O R P. , s ai d n a me s b e i n g f

i c t i t i o u s a n d r e p r e s e n t i n g u n k n o wn pot ent i al l yl i abl e part i es

____________________________________ O n A p p ea l Fro m the U n it ed S tat es D istri ct C o u rt

Forthe D i s tr i ctof N ew J er s ey ( D . C . C i v. N o. 05- cv- 03523) D i s tr i ctJ udge: H onor abl e K athar i ne S. H ay den

__________________________ S u b mi t t e d F o rP o s s i b l e Di s mi s s a l Un d e r2 8 U. S . C. § 1 9 1 5 ( e ) ( 2 ) ( B)

o r T h ir d C ir c u it L A R 2 7 .4 a n d I.O .P . 1 0 .6

D ece m ber8, 2005 Be f o r e : RO TH, FUEN TES AND VA N A NTW ERPEN, CI RCU I T J UD GES

( Fi l ed February8, 2006)

_________________ OP I NI ON

_________________ P E R C UR I AM A p p e llan t S h a w n R . H in e s, a re sid e n t o f W e st O ra n g e , N e w Je rse y , file d a n inAl th o u g h we r e q u i r e d i s tr i c tc o u r t s t o g r a n ta mo t i o n f o rl e a v e t o p r o c e e d i n f o r ma 1 pauper i s unders ect i on 1915( a) bas ed on ec onom i c cr i t er i a al one before di s m i s s i ng a compl ai ntas fr i vol ous , Si nw el l v. Shapp, 536 F. 2d 15 ( 3d C i r . 1976) , w e conc l ude that su c h a g ra n t is im p lied in th e D istric t C o u rt’s o rd e r. W e n o te th a t H in e s’ m o n th ly expens es exce ed hi s di s abi l i tyi ncome. 2 form a paupe r i s compl ai nti n U ni t ed St at es D i s tr i ctC our tforthe D i s tr i ctof N ew J er s ey a g a in st th e U n ited S tate s o f A m e ric a a n d o th e rs, a lleg in g a v io latio n o f h is c iv il righ ts underdom es t i c and i nt ernat i onal l aw . H i nes cl ai m ed thatthe U ni t ed St at es governm ent a n d o th e rs h a v e to rtu re d h im w ith p o iso n o u s g a s f o r th e las t 1 2 y e a rs w h e n e v e r h e tried to s tudyt ow ar d hi s car eergoal s . H e s ought$10, 000, 000 i n m oneydamages and i nj unct i ve reli ef. T h e D istri ct C o u rtd ism issed the c o m p lai n t un d er 2 8 U . S . C . § 1 9 1 5 (e)(2)(B )(i ). 1 O ur C l erk grant ed H i nes l eave to app eal i n fo rm a pau peri s. W e w ill d ism iss th e a p p e a l as f riv o lo u s. T h e f

e d e ra l in f

o rm a p a u p e ris s tatu te perm i t s an i ndi gentl i t i gantt o t ake a n appea l w i thoutpay i ng the admi ni s tr at i ve cos t s of p ro c e e d in g w ith th e a p p e a l. 28 U .S .C . § 1 9 1 5 . T h e sta tu te p ro tec ts a g a in st a b u se s o f th is pr i vi l ege byal l ow i ng the appe al s courtt o di s m i s s the appe al i f i ti s fr i vol ous . D ent on v. H e rn a n d e z , 5 0 4 U .S . 2 5 , 2 7 (1 9 9 2 ). W e th u s h a v e th e “ u n u su a l p o w e r to p ier c e th e v e il of the [un derl y i ng ] com plai nt’ s factual al l egati on s, i d. at32 (quoti ng N ei t zke v . W i l l i am s, 4 9 0 U . S . 3 1 9 , 3 2 7 (19 8 9 )), an d d ism iss th e a p p ea l w h ere tho se f ac tual all eg ati o n s are delusi on al , i rr at i on al , or w ho l l yi ncredi ble, i d. at33 . W e hav e careful l yrevi ew ed H i nes’ com plai nt and co nclude t hat i ti s cl earl ybasel ess for tho se veryreas on s. W e w il l dism iss th e a p p ea l as frivo lou s u n d er 2 8 U . S . C . § 1 9 1 5 (e)(2)(B )(i ).