alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In connection with the quarterly report of Shoe Pavilion, Inc. (the“Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 29, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”),          I, John D. Hellmann, VicePresident and Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

| (1)                                                        | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                               |
|------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|                                                       |                                                                                                                                                |
| (2)                                                        | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company |
|                                                       |                                                                                                                                                |
|                                                       |                                                                                                                                                |
| /s/ JOHN D. HELLMANN                                       |                                                                                                                                                |
|                                                            |                                                                                                                                                |
| **Vice President and Chief Financial Officer May 7, 2003** |                                                                                                                                                |
|                                                            |                                                                                                                                                     |  |

This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002, be deemed filed by the Company for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 22

- 00153

- CR

Stephen Petty John v. The State of Texas

On Appeal from the 272nd District Court of Brazos County , Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 16

- 03318

- CRF

- 272

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having conside red this cause on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal
DISMISSED in accordance with its opinion

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. July 21 , 2022
<TABLE> <S> <C>

     <ARTICLE>      9
     <CIK>          0001050725
     <NAME>         ebank.com, Inc.

<S>                                 <C>
            <PERIOD-TYPE>                       6-Mos
            <FISCAL-YEAR-END>                   DEC-31-2000
            <PERIOD-START>                      JAN-31-2000
            <PERIOD-END>                        JUN-30-2000
            <CASH>                              2,171,789
            <INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>              0
            <FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                    9,220,000
            <TRADING-ASSETS>                    0
            <INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>         97,500
            <INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>              65,553
            <INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                0
            <LOANS>                             55,064,430
            <ALLOWANCE>                         (844,000)
            <TOTAL-ASSETS>                      69,429,227
            <DEPOSITS>                          62,306,579
            <SHORT-TERM>                        0
            <LIABILITIES-OTHER>                 961,234
            <LONG-TERM>                         0
            <PREFERRED-MANDATORY>               0
            <PREFERRED>                         0
            <COMMON>                            14,402,697
            <OTHER-SE>                          (8,241,283)
            <TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>      69,429,227
            <INTEREST-LOAN>                     2,551,072
            <INTEREST-INVEST>                   82,021
            <INTEREST-OTHER>                    0
            <INTEREST-TOTAL>                    2,633,093
            <INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                  1,277,414
            <INTEREST-EXPENSE>                  1,280,962
            <INTEREST-INCOME-NET>               1,352,131
            <LOAN-LOSSES>                       114,000
            <SECURITIES-GAINS>                  0
            <EXPENSE-OTHER>                     5,681,649
            <INCOME-PRETAX>                     (4,395,312)
            <INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>          (4,395,312)
            <EXTRAORDINARY>                     0
            <CHANGES>                           0
            <NET-INCOME>                        (4,395,312)
            <EPS-BASIC>                         (2.81)
            <EPS-DILUTED>                       (2.81)
            <YIELD-ACTUAL>                      5.03
            <LOANS-NON>                         0
            <LOANS-PAST>                        74,586
            <LOANS-TROUBLED>                    0
            <LOANS-PROBLEM>                     0
            <ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                    730,000
            <CHARGE-OFFS>                       0
            <RECOVERIES>                        0
            <ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                   844,000
            <ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                0
            <ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                 0
            <ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>             844,000


</TABLE>
No. 58445.

protest 202619-K (Boston).

#### Emery, Russell & Goodrich, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

At the trial, it was stipulated that the clean content of the wools in question, as determined under the judicial interpretation of the statutory phrase, “clean content of wool,” in *United States*v. *Fred Whitaker Company, Inc.*(40 C. C. P. A. 19, C. A. D. 492), was 69.2 percent. On the agreed facts, the wools in question were held to be dutiable on the basis of 69.2 percent of clean content at the rates applied by the collector.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE
UNAUDITED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE PERIOD ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1998, AND IS
QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                               0
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                             775
<DEPRECIATION>                                      39
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  10,866
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          111,630
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        17,500
<OTHER-SE>                                   (118,264)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    10,866
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                73,145
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,856
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (75,001)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (75,001)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (75,001)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0
        

</TABLE>
Thumbnails Document Outline Attachments Layers
 Current Outline Item
 Previous  Next
 Highlight all  Match case
 Whole words
 Presentation Mode Open Print Download Current View  Go to First Page Go to Last Page  Rotate Clockwise Rotate Counterclockwise  Text Selection Tool Hand Tool  Vertical Scrolling Horizontal Scrolling Wrapped Scrolling  No Spreads Odd Spreads Even Spreads  Document Properties...
 Toggle Sidebar  Find Previous  Next
 Presentation Mode Open Print Download Current View  Tools
 Zoom Out  Zoom In
 Automatic ZoomActual SizePage FitPage Width50%75%100%125%150%200%300%400%
  
 More Information Less Information
 Close
 Enter the password to open this PDF file:
 
 Cancel OK
 -
 -
  -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
 -
  -
 -
 -
 -
  -
 Close
 Cancel
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

COUNSEL CORPORATION, )
Plaintiff )
) CIVIL ACTION
v. ) No. 04-3852
)
GARY J. WASSERSON, )
Defendant )
GARY J. WASSERSON, )
Plaintiff F 1 a D
MAR 3A 2010 CIVIL ACTION
v. —) No. 04-3864

MICHAEL E.)KUNZ, Clerk
I-LINK CORPORATION, et al. By ep. Cle
Defendants )

ORDER

AND NOW, this 31* day of March 2010, upon consideration of Plaintiff Wasserson’s
Motion to Confirm Award of the Arbitrator, Robert B. Davidson, Esquire of JAMS, the
Resolution Experts [docket entry No. 44], Defendants I-Link Corp., et al.’s Opposition to
Plaintiff Wasserson’s Motion to Confirm Arbitration [docket entry No. 45], Defendants I-Link
Corp., et al.’s Motion to Vacate, Modify and/or Correct Arbitral Award [docket entry No. 46],
Defendants’ I-Link Corp.’s Consolidated Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of
Defendants’ Motion to Vacate, Modify, and/or Correct Arbitral award and Opposition to
Plaintiff's Motion to Confirm Award [docket entry No. 47], Wasserson’s Response to the
Consolidated Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of Defendants’ Motion to
Vacate, Modify, and/or Correct Arbitral award and Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Confirm

Award [C.A. No. 04-3864, docket entry No. 52], Defendants’ Reply in Further Support to


Vacate, Modify and/or Correct Arbitral Award [C.A. No. 04-3852, docket entry No. 52; C.A. No.
04-3864, docket entry No. 57], and for reasons set forth in the attached Memorandum Opinion, it
is hereby ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion is DENIED; and Plaintiff's Motion is
GRANTED in part, and DENIED in part.

Further, Defendant Counsel Communications, Inc. (“CCI”) is hereby DISMISSED with
prejudice from Civil Action No. 04-3864, in accordance with the Arbitrator’s findings in JAMS
Arbitration No. 1420014521, Interim Award, dated April 24, 2009.

JUDGMENT shall be awarded to the remaining parties pursuant to JAMS Arbitration
No. 1420014521, Corrected Final Award, dated July 10, 2009, which the Court hereby affirms.

Further, in light of the Court’s Memorandum Opinion and Order, the parties’ request for
oral argument on their respective motions is hereby deemed MOOT.

It is so ORDERED.

BY THE COURT:

THIA M. RUFE, J.
DATE OF NOTICE: April 8, 2003

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

KRISTEN M. LEONARD : CIVIL ACTION

:

 v. :

 : NO. 02-cv-4156

MONTGOMERY INSURANCE SERVICES :

NOTICE

Please be advised that a PRELIMINARY PRETRIAL CONFERENCE will be held by

telephone on Wednesday, April 30, 2003 at 4:30 p.m., with the Honorable Michael M. Baylson. 

Plaintiff will initiate the telephone conference and when all counsel are on the line, call

Chambers at (267) 299.7520.

Attached is a Conference Information Report which you are required to complete and

forward to the Court at least two days prior to the day of the conference. Do not have this

Report docketed. Also attached is the Court’s Scheduling and Discovery Policy.

If trial counsel in this case is unavailable at the time of the conference, another attorney in

trial counsel’s office, who should be familiar with the case, is required to appear at the

conference. The conference will be continued to another date only if no attorney familiar with

the case is available.

 

Lynn Meyer

Deputy Clerk to Judge Baylson

267.299.7521

cc: Ronda O’Donnell, Esq. (fax)

William McLaughlin, Esq. (fax)

Attachments

O:\Pretrial conference forms for cases\Leonard v. Montgomery Insur. Services 02-4156.wpd

Case 2:02-cv-04156-MMB Document 8 Filed 04/08/2003 Page 1 of 1
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS4600 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
No. 60385.

protest 238972-K (New York).

#### Hoffer & Slone and H. W. Robinson & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of chalk-white stones similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 59105, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
# C_2015107EN.01003401.xml

| 30.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 107/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 107/34

---

Action brought on 2 February 2015 — Jääkiekon SM-liiga v OHIM (Liiga)

(Case T-54/15)

(2015/C 107/44)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant(s): Jääkiekon SM-liiga Oy (Helsinki, Finland) (represented by: L. Laaksonen, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word element ‘Liiga’ — Application for registration No 12 056 792

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 1 December 2014 in Case R 576/2014-2

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision and allow the trade mark to proceed to publication; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision and allow the trade mark to proceed to publication;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Plea(s) in law

| — | Infringement of Articles 7(1)(b) and 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Articles 7(1)(b) and 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
No. 57914.

protests 179892-K, etc. (Detroit).

#### F. S. Whelan & Sons *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that the subject of *United States*v. *Geo. Wm. Rueff, Inc.*(41 C. C. P. A. 95, C. A. D. 535), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Filed 12/18/14 P. v. Aguilar CA2/5 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

THE PEOPLE,

Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

HECTOR MANUEL AGUILAR,

Defendant and Appellant. B254829

(Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. VA130811)

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Robert J. Higa, Judge. Affirmed. Steven A. Brody, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. Kamala D. Harris, Attorney General, Da ne R. Gillette, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Lance E. Winters, Assistant Attorn ey General, Scott A. Taryle and Paul M. Roadarmel, Jr., Deputy Attorneys Gene ral, for Plaintiff and Respondent.2 A jury convicted defendant, Hector Manuel Aguilar, also known as Tomas Melendez Sanchez, of carrying c oncealed upon his person a dirk or dagger in violation of

Penal Code section 21310. Defendant was se ntenced to 365 days in the county jail. Defendant has requested that we indepe ndently review the re cord of the trial court’s in camera hearing for review of peace officer personnel records. ( People v. Mooc (2001) 26 Cal.4th 1216, 1228-1232; Pitchess v. Superior Court (1974) 11 Cal.3d 531, 535.) On November 8, 2013, defendant file d a peace officer personnel record disclosure motion. The motion sought all misconduct co mplaints against the arresting officer. On December 17, 2013, the trial court conducted an in camera hearing and found there were

no discloseable materials. We have reviewed the transcript of the in camera hearing. No abuse of discretion occurred. ( People v. Myles (2012) 53 Cal.4th 1181, 1209; People v. Hughes (2002) 27 Cal.4th 287, 330.) The judgment is affirmed.

NOT TO BE PUBLISHE D IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

TURNER, P.J.

We concur:

MOSK, J.

GOODMAN, J. 

 Judge of the Los Angele s Superior Court, assigned by the Chief Justice pursuant to article VI, section 6 of the California Constitution.
Before the First Division,

June 24, 1944

No. 49553.

#### Protests 44627-K, etc., of P. Beiersdorf & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

In view of stipulation of counsel that the merchandise in question is the same in all material respects as that the subject of *Beiersdorf*v. *United States*(31 C. C. P. A. 158, C. A. D. 267), the claims were sustained to this extent.
# C_2015337EN.01003601.xml

| 12.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 337/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 337/36

---

Action brought on 11 August 2015 — Bena Properties v Council

(Case T-469/15)

(2015/C 337/39)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Bena Properties Co. SA (Damascus, Syria) (represented by: E. Ruchat, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Declare the applicant’s action admissible and well founded; |
| --- | --- |

—

Declare the applicant’s action admissible and well founded;

| — | Consequently, annul Decision (CFSP) 2015/837 of 28 May 2015 and the subsequent measures implementing it, in so far as they relate to the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

Consequently, annul Decision (CFSP) 2015/837 of 28 May 2015 and the subsequent measures implementing it, in so far as they relate to the applicant;

| — | Order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant raises three pleas in law which are, in essence, identical or similar to those raised in Case T-432/11 in Makhlouf v Council
   (1).

Makhlouf

Council

1

---

(1)  OJ C 290, p. 13.

1

---
# Sept

# image1.jpg
EXHIBIT 7  CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION
1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection
with the annual report of Enerplus Resources Fund (the Fund) on Form 40-F for
the period ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I Robert J. Waters, Senior Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer of EnerMark Inc., on behalf of the Fund,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)           The Report fully complies with the
requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and  (2)           The information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Fund.  /s/ ROBERT J. WATERSRobert J. WatersSenior Vice President andChief Financial Officer of EnerMark Inc.  May 16, 2003
Case 2:04-cv-02627-HB Document 118 Filed 05/17/2007 Page 1 of 18
Case 2:04-cv-02627-HB Document 118 Filed 05/17/2007 Page 2 of 18
Case 2:04-cv-02627-HB Document 118 Filed 05/17/2007 Page 3 of 18
Case 2:04-cv-02627-HB Document 118 Filed 05/17/2007 Page 4 of 18
Case 2:04-cv-02627-HB Document 118 Filed 05/17/2007 Page 5 of 18
Case 2:04-cv-02627-HB Document 118 Filed 05/17/2007 Page 6 of 18
Case 2:04-cv-02627-HB Document 118 Filed 05/17/2007 Page 7 of 18
Case 2:04-cv-02627-HB Document 118 Filed 05/17/2007 Page 8 of 18
Case 2:04-cv-02627-HB Document 118 Filed 05/17/2007 Page 9 of 18
Case 2:04-cv-02627-HB Document 118 Filed 05/17/2007 Page 10 of 18
Case 2:04-cv-02627-HB Document 118 Filed 05/17/2007 Page 11 of 18
Case 2:04-cv-02627-HB Document 118 Filed 05/17/2007 Page 12 of 18
Case 2:04-cv-02627-HB Document 118 Filed 05/17/2007 Page 13 of 18
Case 2:04-cv-02627-HB Document 118 Filed 05/17/2007 Page 14 of 18
Case 2:04-cv-02627-HB Document 118 Filed 05/17/2007 Page 15 of 18
Case 2:04-cv-02627-HB Document 118 Filed 05/17/2007 Page 16 of 18
Case 2:04-cv-02627-HB Document 118 Filed 05/17/2007 Page 17 of 18
Case 2:04-cv-02627-HB Document 118 Filed 05/17/2007 Page 18 of 18
No. 66736.

#### Alltransport, Inc., and Michael C. Guarino *v.*United States,

protest 309196-K (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise, invoiced as Venetian mosaic in cases numbered 794/800 and 1001/ 1003, consists of mosaics imported for presentation without charge and for the use of a corporation organized and operated exclusively for religious purposes, and that all applicable customs regulations have been complied with, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Before the Second Division,

February 18, 1949

No. 52884.

#### Clutsom Machines, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 96276-K (Philadelphia) .

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The uncontradicted evidence showed that the Clutsom textile machines are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *246
      *Clutsom Machines, Inc.*v. *United States*(21 Cust. Ct. 30, C. D. 1122). Although plaintiff failed to make any claim for relief as to the parts of machines involved in the cited case, appropriate claim was made in the instant case. Following the cited authority, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 54550.

#### Bunge Corporation et al. *v.*United States,

protests 151893-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

The protests were dismissed.