alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<CIK> 0001051285
<NAME> PRECEPT BUSINESS SERVICES, INC.
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                         510,476
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               22,752,049<F1>
<ALLOWANCES>                                 1,395,000
<INVENTORY>                                  5,597,938
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            32,609,371
<PP&E>                                       7,530,651
<DEPRECIATION>                                 933,174
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                              80,877,234
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       26,330,035
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        86,217
<OTHER-SE>                                  24,784,102<F2>
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                80,877,234
<SALES>                                     42,211,491
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            42,211,491
<CGS>                                       27,482,917
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               54,714,252
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                             664,900
<INCOME-PRETAX>                           (13,167,661)
<INCOME-TAX>                               (2,768,278)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                       (10,399,383)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                              (10,399,383)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (1.22)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.20)
<FN>
<F1>AMOUNT REPRESENTS NET ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE.
<F2>AMOUNT INCLUDES ADDITIONAL PAID-IN CAPITAL, RETAINED EARNINGS, AND TREASURY
STOCK.
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
房地美標準短售交易

更快速和更簡單的短售交易,可以幫助遇到困難的

房主避免止贖

您是否想努力保住自己的房屋,但又不符合貸款修改的資格條件?您是否正在考慮賣出物業以避免止贖?如果

您的抵押貸款由房地美擁有,您或許可以使用房地美標準短售交易。

短售指按低於抵押貸款餘額的價格賣出物業。透過短售交易,當我們收到賣出物業的收入時,即使其數額

低於您所欠的貸款餘額,我們也會解除您物業的抵押貸款留置權。您得到的好處是可以避免止贖和取消您

的抵押貸款債務。

房地美標準短售交易具有以下優勢,使短售交易變得更加簡單方便:

 允許服務商獨立審查您的貸款情況並作出決定,從而加快交易過程(交易商是您向其支付抵押貸

款付款的機構);

 擴大符合條件的經濟困難的範圍,並放寬若干其他要求,讓更多遇到困難的房主可以參與;

 接到永久性更換基地(英文簡稱為PCS)命令的軍役人員可以用最少的費用更快地搬出房屋;

 為某些符合資格條件的房主提供$3,000的搬家津貼;及

 清償和解除第一抵押貸款並解除其他抵押貸款債務。

您是否符合資格條件?

如果符合以下條件,您便可以使用房地美標準短售交易:

您的抵押貸款由房地美擁有(使用我們的貸款查詢工具

https://ww3.freddiemac.com/corporate/來確定您的貸款由誰擁有); 



 您已按時支付或拖欠抵押貸款付款,並且: 

- 可以提供證據,證明您遇到符合資格條件的經濟困難(包括接到PCS命令),導致您的生活

費增加或收入減少;及

- 您不符合房地美貸款修改的資格條件,或者您符合貸款修改的資格條件,但由於您需要搬出房

屋,因此您無法接受貸款修改;及

- 未與第三方達成某種計劃或安排,由他們接收您物業的產權,並由他們安排短售,從中收取費

用。

 您已按時支付抵押貸款或者拖欠抵押貸款不到31天,並且您符合以下條件:

- 該物業是您的主要居所;及

- 每月債務收入比超過55%(接到PCS命令的軍役人員可豁免這項要求)。

 您拖欠抵押貸款超過31天(您不必佔用物業)。

在某些情況下,如果您有財務能力,您可能需要在完成短售交易之後支付一筆一次性的款項,或簽署一份

新的本票,以支付一部分未付清的餘額。
軍役人員享有更大的靈活性 

根據房地美標準短售交易,接到永久性更換基地命令的軍役人員享有更大的靈活性,包括:

 將PCS命令視為符合資格條件的經濟困難; 

 如果您已按時支付抵押貸款或者拖欠抵押貸款不到31天、物業是您的主要居所,並且您是在2012年

6月30日之前購買該物業,則可以取消每月債務收入比必須達到55%或以上的要求;及

 如果物業是您的主要居所,並且您是在2012年6月30日之前購買該物業,則可以豁免完成短售交易

所需要的現金繳款/本票繳款要求。

$3,000搬家津貼

在完成短售交易時,您或許可以獲得一筆最高$3,000的津貼,用於支付您的搬家費用。並非所有房主均可

獲得這筆津貼,因此請詢問您的房地美服務商瞭解詳情。

如需更多資訊 

 如果想確定您的抵押貸款是否由房地美擁有,請使用我們的貸款查詢工具

https://ww3.freddiemac.com/corporate/。

 聯絡您的服務商。您的每月對賬單或還款存根上應當可以找到他們的電話號碼和郵寄地址。

 在這裡查閱「軍役人員」的定義:

http://www.freddiemac.com/mortgage_help/popup/servicemembers.html?type=popup&height=400

 到美國住宅與城市發展部(英文簡稱為HUD)的網站

http://www.hud.gov/offices/hsg/sfh/hcc/fc/index.cfm查找您所在地區HUD認定的免費非營利諮詢機

構的名單,您可以登門拜訪他們或者給他們打電話,請他們幫助您獲得關於避免止贖的資訊和援

助。

 聯絡房地美貸款人幫助中心或網路參與者:

http://www.freddiemac.com/mortgage_help/who_to_contact_for_help.html#helpcenters,HUD認

定的非營利住房諮詢人員將提供免費、保密的財務諮詢服務,幫助您獲得關於避免止贖的資訊和

援助。

 瀏覽房地美「抵押貸款幫助資源中心」(Mortgage Help Resource Center):

http://www.freddiemac.com/homeownership/mortgage_help/,查找有用的建議、工具和教育資

源,包括關於與服務商打交道時需要做哪些事情的資訊。這個頁面還包含「預防止贖的講座」

(Foreclosure Prevention Workshops)的連結,該講座由您所在州的社區組織主辦,另外該頁

面還包含其他有用的資源。

腳註:

 房地美不直接提供房地美標準短售交易。房地美服務商將與您一起確定您是否符合資格條件。

 如果您已經與房地美服務商著手進行現有的短售交易或其他避免止贖的房地美方案,房地美標準短售交易

應當對您沒有影響。如果您收到服務商的邀請,或者已經著手實施解決方案,您應當繼續進行目前的行動。

 透過短售交易取消債務可能產生稅務後果。請諮詢您的稅務顧問,討論潛在的稅務後果。

備註:本傳單旨在提供關於房地美標準短售交易的一般資訊,並非全面的概要。此類交易可能有許多其他具體的

條款、條件和限制。請聯絡房地美服務商瞭解關於這項計劃及資格條件的詳細資訊。

出版編號911 ■ 2013年11月

-2-
Before the Third Division,

December 6, 1961

No. 66258.

#### Dalton Cooper, Inc., and H. W. Robinson & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 59/11294, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that involved in *Dalton Cooper, Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(41 Cust. Ct. 271, C.D. 2051), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Donlon, J., dissented for the reasons set forth in her dissenting opinion in C.D. 2051, *supra.*
**Exhibit 12.1**
**FORM OF 302 CERTIFICATIONS**
I, Heinz Sundt, certify that:
 1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Telekom Austria AG;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light ofthe circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to theperiod covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report;  4. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:
 (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is madeknown to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis report is being prepared;  (b) Reserved;  (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based onsuch evaluation; and  (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the company’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report thathas materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the company’sinternal control over financial reporting; and
 5. The company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s auditorsand the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):
 (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financialinformation; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: April 13, 2005            By  /s/ Heinz Sundt  Name:  Heinz Sundt   Title:  Chief Executive Officer
# C_2018166EN.01001502.xml

| 14.5.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 166/15 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.5.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 166/15

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 20 March 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte suprema di cassazione — Italy) — Enzo Di Puma v Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa (Consob) (C-596/16), Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa (Consob) v Antonio Zecca (C-597/16)

(Joined Cases C-596/16 and C-597/16) (1)

1

((References for a preliminary ruling - Directive 2003/6/EC - Insider dealing - Penalties - National legislation which provides for an administrative penalty and a criminal penalty for the same acts - Res judicata attached to a final criminal judgment relating to administrative proceedings - Final criminal judgment ordering acquittal in respect of insider dealing - Effectiveness of the penalties - Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union - Article 50 - Ne bis in idem principle - Criminal nature of the administrative sanction - Existence of the same offence - Article 52(1) - Limitations to the ne bis in idem principle - Conditions))

(2018/C 166/19)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Referring court

Corte suprema di cassazione

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants: Enzo Di Puma (C-596/16), Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa (Consob) (C-597/16)

Applicants:

Defendants: Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa (Consob) (C-596/16), Antonio Zecca (C-597/16)

Defendants:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Article 14(1) of Directive 2003/6/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 28 January 2003 on insider dealing and market manipulation (market abuse), read in the light of Article 50 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation in accordance with which proceedings for an administrative fine of a criminal nature may not be brought following a final criminal judgment of acquittal ruling that the acts capable of constituting a violation of the legislation relating to insider dealing, on the basis of which those proceedings had also been initiated, were not established.

---

(1)  OJ C 63, 27.2.2017.

1

---
(Reap. Dec. 10645)

#### Dalminter, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 4492, etc.

(Decided December 18, 1963)

*Shwrretts, Pal&y <£ Carter*for tbe plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for tbe defendant.

Lawrence, Judge:

The appeals for a reappraisement, enumerated in the schedule attached to and made part of the decision herein, involve the proper value for dutiable purposes of certain seamless steel casing.

By stipulation of the parties hereto it has been agreed as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between counsel for tbe parties hereto that tbe merchandise consists of seamless steel easing, exported from Italy, and that tbe facts and tbe law are similar in all material respects to tbe merchandise tbe subject of *United States*v. *Dalminter, Inc., B. W. Smith,*47 Oust. Ot. page 577, A.R.D. 135.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that tbe record in A.R.D. 135 be incorporated with tbe record in this case.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the prices at which such or similar imported merchandise were freely offered for sale for consumption in tbe United States, packed ready for delivery, in tbe principal market of tbe United States to all purchasers, at tbe time of exportation of tbe imported merchandise, in tbe usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, were tbe prices shown on Schedule A hereto attached less 2 per cent cash discount less 6.604 per cent for general expenses and 5.895 per cent for profit on merchandise exported on or before April 30, 1956 or 5.211 per cent for general expenses and 2.744 per cent for profit on merchandise exported on or after May 1, 1956 less ocean freight and inland freight as stated on the invoices less duty of 7% per cent on easing Grade J-55 or 7% per cent plus 4 per cent on casing Grade N-80.

Upon the record before the court and following the cited authority, I find and hold that United States value, as that value is defined in section 402(e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Administrative Act of 1938 (19 U.S.C. § 1402(e)), is the proper basis of value for the seamless steel casing in issue and that said value is represented by the prices shown on schedule A, hereto attached, less 2 per centum cash discount, less 6.604 per centum for general expenses and 5.895 per centum for profit on merchandise, exported on or before April 30, 1956, or 5.211 per centum for general expenses and 2.744 per centum for profit on merchandise, exported on or after May 1, 1956, less ocean freight and inland freight as stated on the invoices, *501less duty of 7% per centum on casing grade J-55, or 7% per centum, plus 4 per centum on casing grade N-80.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 219 (Wednesday, November 15, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 78396]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-25060]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

OFFICE OF PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT


President's Commission on White House Fellowships Advisory 
Committee: Closed Meeting

AGENCY: President's Commission on White House Fellowships, Office of 
Personnel Management.

ACTION: Notice of meeting.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The President's Commission on White House Fellowships (PCWHF) 
was established by an executive order in 1964. The PCWHF is an advisory 
committee composed of Special Government Employees appointed by the 
President.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rosemarie Vela, 712 Jackson Place NW, 
Washington, DC 20503, Phone: 202-395-4522.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 
    Name of Committee: President's Commission on White House 
Fellowships Mid-Year Meeting.
    Date: January 19, 2024.
    Time: 8 a.m.-5:30 p.m.
    Place Eisenhower Executive Office Building, 1650 Pennsylvania Ave. 
NW, Washington, DC 20500.
    Agenda: The Commission holds a mid-year meeting to talk with 
current Fellows on how their placements are going and discuss 
preparation for future events.
    Authority: Executive Orders 11183 and 14109.

Office of Personnel Management.
Kayyonne Marston,
Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2023-25060 Filed 11-14-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6325-69-P
**Exhibit 32****CERTIFICATION**     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted),Michael Grey, the Chief Executive Officer of SGX Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”), and ToddMyers, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of hisknowledge:1. The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the yearended December 31, 2006, to which this Certification isattached as Exhibit 32 (the “Annual Report”), fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) orSection 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended; and 2. The information contained in the Annual Report fairlypresents, in all material respects, the financialcondition of the Company at the end of the period coveredby the Annual Report and results of operations of theCompany for the period covered by the Annual Report.Dated: March 30, 2007   /s/ Michael Grey /s/ Todd Myers   Michael Grey Todd Myers   Chief Executive Officer    Chief Financial OfficerA signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to theCompany and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commissionor its staff upon request.This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it relates, is not deemed filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filling ofthe Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any generalincorporation language contained in such filing.
# C_2018142EN.01000301.xml

| 23.4.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 142/3 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

23.4.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 142/3

---

Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 27 February 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Queen’s Bench Division (Administrative Court) — United Kingdom) — The Queen, on the application of: Western Sahara Campaign UK v Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

(Case C-266/16) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco - Protocol setting out the fishing opportunities provided for by the agreement - Acts approving the conclusion of the agreement and of the protocol - Regulations allocating among the Member States the fishing opportunities set out by the protocol - Jurisdiction - Interpretation - Validity having regard to Article 3(5) TEU and international law - Applicability of that agreement and that protocol to the territory of Western Sahara and the waters adjacent thereto))

(2018/C 142/03)

Language of the case: English

Referring court

Referring court

High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Queen’s Bench Division (Administrative Court)

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: The Queen, on the application of: Western Sahara Campaign UK

Applicant:

Defendants: Commissioners for Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs, Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs

Defendants:

Intervener: Confédération marocaine de l’agriculture et du développement rural (Comader)

Intervener:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

Since neither the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Community and the Kingdom of Morocco nor the Protocol between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco setting out the fishing opportunities and financial contribution provided for in the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and the Kingdom of Morocco are applicable to the waters adjacent to the territory of Western Sahara, consideration of the first question referred for a preliminary ruling has revealed nothing capable of affecting the validity of Council Regulation (EC) No 764/2006 of 22 May 2006 on the conclusion of that agreement, Council Decision 2013/785/EU of 16 December 2013 on the conclusion of that protocol, and Council Regulation (EU) No 1270/2013 of 15 November 2013 on the allocation of fishing opportunities under that protocol, in the light of Article 3(5) TEU.

---

(1)  OJ C 260, 18.7.2016.

1

---
No. 55819.

protests 165452-K and 167308-K (New York).

#### Novelty Veiling Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

The protests were dismissed.
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**Certification of Chief Executive OfficerPursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350as Adopted Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

I, WeiZhou, President and Chief Executive Officer of INTAC International, Inc.(the “Company”), hereby certify pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Act”) that to my knowledge on the date hereof:

(a)           TheAnnual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year endedSeptember 30, 2006, filed on the date hereof with the Securities andExchange Commission (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements ofSection 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

(b)           Informationcontained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| Dated:     December 14,  2006 |                                   |
|-------------------------------------------------------------|----------------------------------------|
|                                                        |                                   | /s/ WEI ZHOU |   |
|                                                        |                                   | Wei Zhou |   |
|                                                        | President and Chief  Executive Officer |   |

 

Thiscertification is being furnished solely for purposes of Section 906 of theAct, and shall not be deemed filed by the Company for purposes ofSection 18 of the Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to theliability of that section.

----
Dismissed and Opinion Filed March 27, 2015 

# S

In The 

## Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas
No. 05-14-01185-CV PAULINE FARLEY, Appellant V. THE FALLS APARTMENTS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-14-04142-A



### MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Francis, Lang-Miers, and Whitehill Opinion by Justice Whitehill The filing fee, docketing statement, and clerk’s record in this case are past due. By postcard dated September 16, 2014, we notified appellant the $195 filing fee was due. We directed appellant to remit the filing fee within ten days and expressly cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in dismissal of the appeal. Also by postcard dated September 16, 2014, we notified appellant the docketing statement had not been filed in this case. We directed appellant to file the docketing st atement within ten days. We cau tioned appellant that failure to do so might result in dismissal of this appe al. By letter dated January 27, 2015, we informed appellant the clerk’s record had not been file d because appellant had not paid for or made arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record. We directed appellant to provide verification of payment or arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record or written documentation that appellant–2– had been found to be entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We cautioned appellant that failure to do so would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date, appellant has not paid the filing fee, filed the docketing statement, provided the required documentation, or otherwise corresponded with the C ourt regarding the status of this appeal. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See T EX
. R. A PP
. P. 37.3(b); 42.3(b), (c).

141185F.P05 /Bill Whitehill/ BILL WHITEHILL JUSTICE–3– 

# S

Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas JUDGMENT
PAULINE FARLEY, Appellant
No. 05-14-01185-CV V. THE FALLS APARTMENTS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1, Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. CC-14-04142-A. Opinion delivered by Justice Whitehill. Justices Francis and Lang-Miers participating. In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED

. It is ORDERED that appellee THE FALLS APARTMEN TS recover its costs of this appeal from appellant PAULINE FARLEY.
Judgment entered March 27, 2015.
Before the First Division,

December 23, 1943

No. 49054.

#### Protest 27404-K of H. P. Lambert Co., Inc. (Boston).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the kelp meal is the same as that involved in *Centennial Flouring Mills Co.*v. *United States*(29 C. C. P. A. 264, C. A. D. 200) the claim for free entry was sustained.
No. 52151.

protest 73242-K (Philadelphia).

#### J. M. MacDonald Import Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

*260Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with- stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal (Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on the entry. The protest was sustained to this extent.