alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 48405.

#### Protest 977644-G of J. T. Steeb & Co., Inc. (Seattle).

Opinion by

Keeps, J.

The merchandise was entered as being free of duty under paragraph 1615, Tariff Act of 1930, and a bond was given for the production of the certificate of exportation within 6 months from the date of entry. A request was made upon the collector at Blaine for said certificate to be forwarded to Seattle, but the certificate was not received by the collector at Seattle until after the expiration of the bond and after the entry had been liquidated as dutiable under the appropriate paragraph of the tariff act. All of the other regulations of the Secretary of the Treasury regarding identification of returned American goods were complied with. From the record presented, and in view of the fact that Blaine is a subport of Seattle, it would seem that the information to be supplied was already at hand and the collector at Seattle would not require the production of information which was already a matter of record before him'. In any event, the court was of the opinion that any doubt as to the matter of extension of time having been granted should be resolved in favor of the importer inasmuch as the broker had done all that could be done in the matter of providing the certificate of exportation within the prescribed time. Judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff.
# C_2015245EN.01004402.xml

| 27.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 245/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 245/44

---

Action brought on 8 June 2015 — Atlas v OHIM (EFEKT PERLENIA)

(Case T-298/15)

(2015/C 245/54)

Language of the case: Polish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Atlas sp. z. o.o. (Łódz, Poland) (represented by R. Rumpel, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word elements ‘EFEKT PERLENIA’ — Application for registration No 12 668 125.

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 13 March 2015 in Case R 2352/2014-5.

Contested decision:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that Court should:

| — | declare the action to be well founded; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare the action to be well founded;

| — | set aside the contested decision in so far as it rejected the application for registration; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the contested decision in so far as it rejected the application for registration;

| — | amend the contested decision in such a way that the mark may be registered for all of the goods and services claimed; |
| --- | --- |

—

amend the contested decision in such a way that the mark may be registered for all of the goods and services claimed;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Breach of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Breach of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
April 25, 1962

No. 66719. — Suit 5074.

#### Textile Printing & Finishing Co., Inc. *v.*United States.

C.D. 2231 affirmed January 15, 1962. C.A.D. 789.
March 12, 1959

No. 62848.

#### Nylonge Corporation *v.*United States and American Sponge & Chamois Co., Inc., party in interest,

protests 58/19280, etc.

The following order was signed by

Chief Judge Webster J. Oliver and Judge Irvin C. Mollison:

order

The plaintiff in the above-entitled action, by its counsel, Ulmer, Berne, Laronge, Glickman & Curtis, having moved this court for an order transferring the above-enumerated protests to the next Cleveland, Ohio, trial calendar of this court, and Sharretts, Paley & Carter, attorneys for American Sponge & Chamois Co., Inc., party in interest, having appeared in opposition thereto, and the said attorneys for the party in interest having moved this court for an order for payment of expenses and reasonable counsel fees in the event that the motion for transfer be granted, and the said counsel for the plaintiff, and George Cochran Doub, Assistant Attorney General, attorney for the United States, defendant, having appeared in opposition to the said motion for payment of expenses and counsel fees,, and due consideration of the matters having been had, it is hereby

*307ORDERED that the said motion for transfer to the next Cleveland, Ohio, docket of this court be and the same is hereby granted only upon conditions that, on or before April 1, 1959, the plaintiff pay or cause to be paid to the attorney for the party in interest the sum of one hundred sixty dollars ($160) for the traveling and subsistence expenses of counsel to Cleveland and return, and it is

Further Ordered that the foregoing condition is limited in application to hearing at the Cleveland calendar of this court, scheduled in that city beginning April 17, 1959, at 10 a.m., and it is

Further Ordered that, to the extent indicated above, the motion made by counsel for the party in interest be and the same is hereby granted, but that the said motion in all other respects, and with reference to the payment of counsel fees, be and the same is hereby denied.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WILBERT PERERA :

: CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-CV-4205

Plaintiff, :

:

v. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION;

BAYER AG;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE;

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM

:

:

:

:

:

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

:

Defendants. :

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of the Court:

Kindly enter the appearances of Hope S. Freiwald, Aline Fairweather, Erin

Brennan and Kirstin J. Miller as attorneys for defendant SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a

GlaxoSmithKline.

Respectfully Submitted,

_____________________________ _____________________________

Hope S. Freiwald Aline Fairweather

_____________________________ _____________________________

Erin Brennan Kirstin J. Miller

DECHERT PRICE & RHOADS

4000 Bell Atlantic Tower

1717 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2793

(215) 994-4000

Case 2:02-cv-04205-AB Document 8 Filed 10/02/2002 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 15.1**

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING    FIRM

The Board of DirectorsGiven Imaging Ltd. 

      We consent to the incorporation by      reference in the Registration Statements (Nos. 333-134739, 333-118473,    333-107630 and 333-73732) on Form S-8 of Given Imaging Ltd. (the “Company”) of our report dated April 12, 2007, with respect    to the consolidated balance sheets of the Company and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006    and 2005, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in shareholders’ equity    and cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2006, which    report appears in the December 31, 2006 Annual Report on Form 20-F of the Company. Our report on the consolidated financial statements  refers to the adoption by the Company of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123R, “*Share-Based    Payment”*, effective  January 1, 2006. 
/s/ Somekh ChaikinSomekh Chaikin Certified Public Accountants (Isr.) Member Firm of KPMG International
Tel - Aviv, IsraelMay 15, 2007
Faulk, Scott (OST) From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: U. S. Dept ofTransportation
Scott Faulk Patricia Alexander <palexanderl@ymail.com> Tuesday, April 07, 2015 11:43 PM Faulk, Scott (OST) mreeve@reevecorp.com air transport - ·- u 11 'tiL.-1 ... ; '""' 

## _-,-..**·r·t~rJRTrl**!0.' I

. t· -· .0.' ·' ,J,\**:-~.--.:** 1-**n:::p::t-T'O~\'S** .J-'- .....**~tlr\,1** I.

My name is Doris Kompkoff. I'm a resident ofTatitlek, AKand want to let you knowthat Reeve Air Alaska is very important to ourvillage. He is dependable whenwe need freight or a flight to and from Anchorage. I support Mike Reeve, because we all can depend on him, he has a great schedule and is dedicated to ourneeds and understands howexpensive flight costs are to us and gives us a fare rate so we can afford to get to where we need to go when we have to go. We all appreciate his professionalism and kindness. It's so comforting knowing we will have a safe, enjoyable flight when we need it.

Doris E. Kompkoff P.O. Box 146 Tatitlek, AK 99677
Ph# 907-230-3416

1
### TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03

- 0 2

- 00 550

- CV

NL Industries, Inc./James A. Howard, Special Deputy Receiver of Tex as Employers

Insurance Association

, Appellants

v.

James A. Howard, Special Deputy Receiver of Texas Employers Insurance

Association/NL Industries, Inc. , Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 98TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

NO. GN000738 , HONORABLE DARLENE BYRNE , JUDGE PRESIDING

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

Appellant and Cross

- Appellee NL Industries, Inc. and Appellee/Cross

- Appellant James A.

Howard, Special Deputy Receiver of Texas Employers Insurance Assoc iation, have settled this case and

have jointly moved to dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.1(a). We grant the motion and dismiss

the appeal.

Jan P. Patterson, Justice

Before Justices Kidd, Yeakel and Patterson

Dismissed on Joint MotionFiled: June 12, 2003
No. 50877.

#### Protest 744554-G of Max Oberdorfer (Portland, Oreg.).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

When this protest was called for hearing the case was submitted with the request that it be reopened, if necessary. The court’s attention was not drawn to any proclamation of the President nor was there any evidence tending to support any of the claims made. An examination of the papers disclosing no reason for disturbing the decision of the collector, which was presumptively correct, the protest was overruled.
G‐Invoicing Implementation Timeline for

Enterprise Resource Planning and Software Provider

Oracle

For More Information

To access specific information relating to Oracle’s support for your Agency, please refer

to the Oracle Website Document Repository: Oracle Support Document 2600811.1.  For

additional information or assistance in accessing this information, please contact Mr.

Manish Somani at manish.somani@oracle.com.

Join our Working Group

For information on Oracle's G‐Invoicing product direction, please join monthly calls with

the Oracle Working Group and Oracle Development Resources hosted by Ms. Lana Null

(DOT). To join the Oracle Working Group calls, contact Lana.Null@faa.gov.
Before the Third Division,

March 26, 1958

No. 61738.

#### The Mutual Paper Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 310370-K (New York).

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

   Schedule of Year-To-Date Principal and Interest Distributions
                           to
                  Certificateholders
                                                                              Ending
Class                   Interest             Principal      Losses           Balance
<S>                     <C>                  <C>            <C>              <C>
A1                       142,505.50         771,780.56         0.00         23,657,734.02
A2                       213,009.47         771,780.56         0.00         33,309,734.02
A3                        56,303.33               0.00         0.00          9,652,000.00
A4                       104,368.57          51,502.20         0.00         17,223,295.47
A5                       647,738.40       2,001,569.24         0.00        105,210,303.76
APO                            0.00           1,298.52         0.00            314,335.63
AR                             0.00               0.00         0.00                  0.00
B1                        12,674.10           6,254.22         0.00          2,091,527.97
B2                         5,433.48           2,681.23         0.00            896,653.15
B3                         4,228.72           2,086.72         0.00            697,838.71
B4                         3,626.33           1,789.47         0.00            598,431.48
B5                         1,204.76             594.51         0.00            198,814.45
B6                         1,946.12               0.00       895.25            299,390.20

</TABLE>
No. 57182.

protests 173291-K, etc. (New York).

#### Ignaz Strauss & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” consist of brass silent butlers similar in all material respects to those the subject of *The Fan Co.*v. *United States*(25 Cust. Ct. 42, C. D. 1261) and that the items marked “B” consist of brass smoothing irons and other trays the same as those involved in *Ignaz Strauss & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(28 Cust. Ct. 280, C. D. 1423), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
TS-EMLA10/20/30 

Attachment #7

Pt. 2, Sec. B, 1a 

Processing Information on the New Chemical Substance at Industrial Sites 

Controlled by Others 
TS-EMLA10/20/30 
Manufacturing and Processing Information on the New Chemical Substances at 

Industrial Sites Controlled by Others – Processing of Adhesion Promoters (LAS)
Manufacturing and Processing Information on the New Chemical 

Substances at Industrial Sites Controlled by Others – Processing of Emulsifiers
Dismissed and Opinion Filed March 27, 2015 

S 

In The 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-14-01185-CV 

PAULINE FARLEY, Appellant 

V. 

THE FALLS APARTMENTS, Appellee 

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 1 

Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. CC-14-04142-A 

MEMORANDUM OPINION 

Before Justices Francis, Lang-Miers, and Whitehill 

Opinion by Justice Whitehill 

The filing fee, docketing statement, and clerk’s record in this case are past due. By 

postcard dated September 16, 2014, we notified appellant the $195 filing fee was due. We 

directed appellant to remit the filing fee within ten days and expressly cautioned appellant that 

failure to do so would result in dismissal of the appeal. Also by postcard dated September 16, 

2014, we notified appellant the docketing statement had not been filed in this case. We directed 

appellant to file the docketing statement within ten days. We cautioned appellant that failure to 

do so might result in dismissal of this appeal. By letter dated January 27, 2015, we informed 

appellant the clerk’s record had not been filed because appellant had not paid for or made 

arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record. We directed appellant to provide verification of 

payment or arrangements to pay for the clerk’s record or written documentation that appellant 
 –2– 

had been found to be entitled to proceed without payment of costs. We cautioned appellant that 

failure to do so would result in the dismissal of this appeal without further notice. To date, 

appellant has not paid the filing fee, filed the docketing statement, provided the required 

documentation, or otherwise corresponded with the Court regarding the status of this appeal. 

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(b); 42.3(b), (c). 

141185F.P05 

 

/Bill Whitehill/ 

BILL WHITEHILL 

JUSTICE 
 –3– 

S 

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

JUDGMENT 

PAULINE FARLEY, Appellant 

No. 05-14-01185-CV V. 

THE FALLS APARTMENTS, Appellee 

 On Appeal from the County Court at Law 

No. 1, Dallas County, Texas 

Trial Court Cause No. CC-14-04142-A. 

Opinion delivered by Justice Whitehill. 

Justices Francis and Lang-Miers 

participating. 

 In accordance with this Court’s opinion of this date, this appeal is DISMISSED. 

 It is ORDERED that appellee THE FALLS APARTMENTS recover its costs of this 

appeal from appellant PAULINE FARLEY. 

Judgment entered March 27, 2015.
**EXHIBIT
      32.1**




**CERTIFICATION**


**OF**


**CHIEF
      EXECUTIVE OFFICER**


**AND**


**CHIEF
      FINANCIAL OFFICER**


**PURSUANT
      TO 18 U.S.C. 1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**




I,
      Eliron
      Yaron, Chief Executive officer (and Principal Financial Accounting Officer)
      of
      Shelron Group Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant
      to
      Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report on Form
      10-KSB/A of Shelron Group, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2007 fully
      complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
      Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such Annual Report on
      Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
      and results of operations of Shelron Group, Inc. and its
      subsidiaries.




Pursuant
      to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, this
      certification is being furnished and is not deemed filed.




Date:
                October 10, 2008
            /s/
                Eliron YaronEliron
                YaronChief
                Executive Officerand
                Principal Financial Accounting
                Officer
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Duke Capital LLC (Duke Capital) on Form 10-Q for the period ending September 30, 2005 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, David L. Hauser, President of Duke Capital, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Duke Capital.
| | --- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                           
|-------------------------------------------
|/s/    DAVID L. HAUSER                     
|David L. Hauser President November 14, 2005
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Blue Ridge Energy, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2003 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Patrick A. Kelleher, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

    (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.

/s/ Patrick A. Kelleher
Patrick A. Kelleher
President and Chief Executive Officer
November 14, 2003
Agency Identifier to Trading Partner FR Entity List 

AID TP FR entities 

000 0100 

000 0912 

001 0100 

002 0200 

003 0300 

004 0400 

005 0500 

008 0800 

009 0902 

009 0908 

009 0100 

009 1900 

001 0100 

002 0200 

003 0300 

004 0400 

005 0500 

010 1000 

010 1500 

010 0100 

011 1100 

011 4700 

011 1900 

011 1125 

011 1133 

011 2000 

011 7200 

011 1137 

012 1200 

012 1400 

013 1300 

014 1400 

015 1500 

016 1601 

016 1602 

017 DE00 

018 1800 
019 1900 

020 2000 

020 7000 

021 DE00 

023 2300 

024 2400 

024 1000 

025 2500 

026 2600 

027 2700 

028 2800 

028 2000 

029 2900 

031 3100 

033 3300 

033 3302 

033 3301 

033 3303 

034 3400 

036 3600 

042 4700 

045 4500 

047 4700 

047 1400 

049 4900 

050 5000 

051 5100 

054 5400 

057 DE00 

060 6002 

061 6100 

062 6200 

065 6500 

068 6800 

069 6900 

069 6903 

070 7000 

071 7700 

072 7200 

072 7700 
073 7300 

074 7400 

075 7500 

075 2000 

077 7700 

080 8000 

083 8300 

084 8400 

086 8600 

088 8800 

089 8900 

090 9000 

091 9100 

093 9300 

096 DE00 

096 1400 

097 DE00 

097 6900 

099 9900 

130 4850 

164 9537 

166 9536 

235 4823 

236 9580 

237 9579 

239 9582 

242 9584 

245 9583 

246 9585 

247 9587 

254 9552 

256 4847 

272 9558 

283 4833 

290 9581 

292 4830 

295 4829 

302 9569 

306 9502 

309 4600 
310 9503 

313 9504 

321 9506 

323 9507 

326 9508 

338 9511 

339 9512 

345 9538 

347 9516 

349 9552 

349 9551 

352 7801 

352 7802 

360 9518 

362 9543 

368 9520 

372 9521 

373 2000 

376 4838 

381 9522 

382 9523 

387 9524 

389 4100 

394 9527 

413 9530 

417 5901 

418 5902 

420 6300 

421 9531 

424 9532 

428 9560 

431 4811 

432 9533 

434 9534 

435 4812 

437 4813 

453 4814 

455 6400 

456 9539 

458 9540 
465 7601 

471 9577 

472 9501 

473 9586 

474 5903 

478 4700 

479 4844 

480 4845 

485 9515 

486 8900 

487 9542 

487 9549 

510 9548 

511 9557 

511 9553 

512 9550 

513 9555 

514 9554 

517 9559 

519 9561 

524 9563 

525 9564 

535 9578 

537 9566 

537 9573 

539 9568 

542 9567 

545 9588 

546 4849 

569 9589 

570 1900 

573 9570 

574 4848 

575 4841 

579 9572 

580 2000 

581 9571
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING

MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL

OF FLORIDA

SECOND DISTRICT

ANTWAN D. JOHNSON, )

)

Appellant, )

)

v. ) Case No. 2D17-4573

)

STATE OF FLORIDA, )

)

Appellee. )

)

Opinion filed June 20, 2018. 

Appeal pursuant to Fla. R. App. P. 

9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Polk 

County; Neil Roddenberry, Judge

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. 

CASANUEVA, CRENSHAW, and BLACK, JJ., Concur.
# C_2016027EN.01007201.xml

| 25.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 27/72 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 27/72

---

Action brought on 20 November 2015 — Osho Lotus Commune v OHIM — Osho International Foundation (OSHO)

(Case T-670/15)

(2016/C 027/91)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Osho Lotus Commune e.V. (Cologne, Germany) (represented by: M. Viefhues, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Osho International Foundation (Zurich, Switzerland)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘OSHO’ — Application for registration No 1 224 831

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

Procedure before OHIM

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 22 September 2015 in Case R 1997/2014-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order OHIM and, where relevant, the other party to the proceedings to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM and, where relevant, the other party to the proceedings to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b), (c) and (f) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b), (c) and (f) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---