alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
No. 56325.

petition 6746-R (Norfolk).

#### The Hipage Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

*382Opinion by

Mollison, J.

The merchandise was entered at the total invoiced amount, less certain enumerated costs, except “Value outside packs and packing.” Although not stated on the invoice, it appeared that certain items representing commission, insurance, and bill of lading had been deducted from the total invoice amount, but were included in the invoice unit price. The merchandise was appraised at the invoice unit price, less the charges for consular fee, freight to Norfolk, and cost of loading, packed, which resulted in an advance in value. At the trial petitioner’s witness testified that the petitioner had been misled by the failure of the invoice to indicate the items of commission, insurance, and bill of lading, and by the belief that the items of inland freight and inland insurance were nondutiable, into adopting the invoice total amount as to the basis for entry. On the record presented it was held that there was no intention to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or, misrepresent the facts of the case or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore granted.
# Apr

# image1.jpg
EXHIBIT 23.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS'


Board of Directors and Shareholders
World Gaming Plc and Subsidiaries


We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration
Statement on Form S-8 (SEC File No. 333-70056) of World Gaming Plc of our audit
report dated March 10, 2005, which is part of and relates to the consolidated
financial statements contained in this Form 20-F, and all references to our firm
included in this Form 20-F.


/s/ HJ & Associates, LLC

HJ & Associates, LLC
Salt Lake City, Utah
May 24, 2005
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 846 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives on support for Estonia, 

Latvia, and Lithuania. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

APRIL 25, 2018 

Mr. CONAWAY submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the 

Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives on 

support for Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania. 

Whereas the Baltic countries of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania are highly valued allies of the United States, and 

they have repeatedly demonstrated their commitment to 

advancing our mutual interests as well as those of the 

NATO Alliance; 

Whereas, Operation Atlantic Resolve is a series of exercises 

and coordinating efforts demonstrating the United States 

commitment to its European partners and allies, including the Baltic countries of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania, with the shared goal of peace and stability in the 

region; 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 846 IH 

Whereas, Operation Atlantic Resolve strengthens communication and understanding, and is an important effort to 

deter Russian aggression in the region; 

Whereas through Operation Atlantic Resolve, the European 

Deterrence Initiative undertakes exercises, training, and 

rotational presence necessary to reassure and integrate 

our allies, including the Baltic countries, into a common 

defense framework; 

Whereas all three Baltic countries contributed to the NATOled International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan, sending troops and operating with few caveats; and 

Whereas the Baltic countries continue to commit resources 

and troops to the Resolute Support Mission in Afghanistan: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) reaffirms its support for the principle of col3 lective defense in Article 5 of the North Atlantic 

4 Treaty for our NATO allies, including Estonia, Lat5 via, and Lithuania; 

6 (2) supports the sovereignty, independence, ter7 ritorial integrity, and inviolability of Estonia, Latvia, 

8 and Lithuania as well as their internationally recog9 nized borders, and expresses concerns over increas10 ingly aggressive military maneuvering by the Rus11 sian Federation near their borders and airspace; 

12 (3) expresses concern over and condemns sub13 versive and destabilizing activities by the Russian 

14 Federation within the Baltic countries; and 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 846 IH 

1 (4) encourages the Administration to further 

2 enhance defense cooperation efforts with Estonia, 

3 Latvia, and Lithuania and supports the efforts of 

4 their Governments to provide for the defense of their 

5 people and sovereign territory. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
**Exhibit 14.1**

 

Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

To the Board of Management and Supervisory Board of 

Allianz SE: 

 

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (File No. 333-13462 and File No. 333-139900) on Form S-8 relating to the Allianz Employee Stock Purchase Plan for the North American Allianz Group Companies and inthe registration statement on Form F-3 (File No. 333-151308) of our reports dated March 31, 2009, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of Allianz SE and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated incomestatements, consolidated statements of changes in equity and consolidated statements of cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2008, and the financial statement schedules and the effectiveness of internalcontrol over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, which reports appear in the December 31, 2008 annual report on Form 20-F of Allianz SE. 

 

KPMG AG 

Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft

 

(formerly 

KPMG Deutsche Treuhand-Gesellschaft Aktiengesellschaft 

Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft) 

 

Munich, Germany 

March 31, 2009
Order entered April 11, 2019

In The



## Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas

No. 05

- 18

- 01366

- CR

DAVID GARCIA, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal Dist rict Court No. 1

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F18

- 52886

- H



### O RDER

Before the Court is court reporter Crystal R. Jones

- Brown’s April 10, 2019 first request

for an extension of time to file the reporter’s record. We GRANT the request and ORDER the

reporter’s record filed within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order.

/s/ LANA MYERS

JUSTICE
No. 53955.

#### Knickerbocker Mills Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 135606-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation that the merchandise consists of laurel leaves similar in all material respects to those the subject of *The Levy & Levis Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(23 Cust. Ct. 8, C. D. 1180), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
VIA	Rail	Accessible	Sleeper/Uwe	Rutenberg (Used	with	permission.		Not	to	be	used	for	commercial	purposes.)

									

Fig. 1	Top	view	A	end	of	VIA	sleeper car

Overall	dimensions	for	restroom/shower	combined	with	sleeper	compartment

Length	VIA: 15’7”																								Length	Amtrak:	9’5”

Width	VIA:	8’5”																												Width	Amtrak:	6’9”

Non-disabled	passengers	enter	car	through	B	end	of	next	car

Car	corridor

Access	by	Cassette	Lift	to	vestibule

Access	by	Cassette	Lift	to	vestibule

Entrance	to	Accessible	Sleeper

Compartment

Single	bed/sofa
VIA	Rail	Accessible	sleeper	car	features

Washroom	section

 Entrance	door:	power	sliding	with	touch	control,	both	sides,	with	override	by	VIA	personnel	in	case	of	emergency

 Toilet	height	18”

 Flush	control	in	front/side	of	toilet

 Grab	bars	at	toilet	and	in	shower

 Pivoting	armrest	in	shower

 Flip	up/down	seat	in	shower

 Hand	held	shower	head	with	timer

 Shower	curtain	around	shower	stall

 Emergency	pull	string	in	shower	stall

 Emergency	call	button	at	vanity	at	12”	from	floor

 Automatic	proximity	controls	for	lavatory



Sleeper	section

 Entrance	through	power	sliding	door

 Turning	circle	in	front	of	bed	60”	mm

 Bed	and	sofa	height	18”

 All	control	and	call	buttons	within	reach	from	bed	in	Braille,	raised	letters	and	color

 Visual	and	audio	alarm	dual	in	washroom	and	sleeper	section

 Speaker	for	entertainment	in	sofa	headrest

 Adjustable table	for	passenger	in	wheelchair	and	companion	near	large	window

 Storage	for	wheelchair	near	bed/sofa

 Space	for	service	animal	
		

Fig. 2 Entrance	power	door																													Fig.	3	Toilet	with	grab	bars																																		Fig.	4	Shower	seat	with	pivoting	support	arm
		 		

Fig.	5	60”	circle	in	front	of	bed															Fig.	6	Bed	height	same	as	wheelchair									Fig.	7	Adjustable	table	near	window

Fig.	8	Dual	audio	and	visual	alarm
Exhibit 32

                CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


         The  undersigned,  who are the chief  executive  officer  and the chief
financial  officer of GrandSouth  Bancorporation,  Inc.,  each hereby  certifies
that, to the best of his knowledge,  the  accompanying  Form 10-KSB for the year
ended December 31, 2004,  fully complies with the  requirements of Section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities  Exchange Act of 1934 and that information  contained
in the report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition
and results of operations of the issuer.

March 31, 2005

                                       s/Mason Y. Garrett
                                       -----------------------------------
                                       Mason Y. Garrett
                                       Chief Executive Officer


                                       s/J. B. Garrett
                                       -----------------------------
                                       J. B. Garrett
                                       Chief Financial Officer
No. 59453.

protests 174333-K, etc. (New York).

#### Baar & Beards, Inc., and Taub, Hummel & Schnall, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silk scarves or squares similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *The Specialty House, Inc., Bryant & Heffernan, Inc., et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 136, C. A. D. 585), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
U.S. authorization from Decision XX/5 3,233,456 12.7%3,233,456 12.7% Changes between proposed and final U.S. authorization from Decision XXI/11 NA NA 2,018 0.0% additional authorization for SE strawberry nurseries (1) Total US Authorization 3,233,456 12.7%3,235,474 12.7% (2) - Maximum allowable new production/import 2,763,456 10.8%2,765,474 10.8% (3) = Minimum allowable CSA 470,000 1.8% 470,000 1.8% U.S. authorization (1) 3,233,456 12.7%3,235,474 12.7% (4) - Reduction for uptake of alternatives 0.0% 0.0% (6) = One year's CUE need 3,233,456 12.7%3,235,474 12.7% x Percentage of year's production to recover 62.940% 62.936% (6) = SCF to meet that need 2,035,000 2,036,000 additional authorization has slight effect on SCF value (7) Existing pre-phaseout inv on 1/1/09 ("ES") 4,271,226 4,271,226 (8) - Estimated/actual drawdown of ES during 2009 ("D") 2,834,226 1,207,118 (9) - SCF (6) 2,035,000 2,036,000 (10) = Available stocks ("AS") -598,000 1,028,108 4.0% (11) Reported as produced/imported in 2008 3,036,130 3,036,130 (12) - Reported as sold in 2008 2,768,853 2,784,539 (13) = Unsold carryover 267,277 251,591 1.0% carryover was not correctly applied in proposal U.S. authorization (1) 3,233,456 12.7%3,235,474 12.7% - Minimum Allowable CSA (3) 470,000 1.8% 1,028,108 4.0% - Carryover (13) 267,277 1.0% 251,591 1.0% - Research 0 0.0% 0 0.0% - Uptake of alternatives 0 0.0% 0 0.0% = Gross new production (14) 2,496,179 9.8%1,955,775 7.7% (14) Gross new production 2,496,179 - New Production in 2009 2,275,715 (15) = Increase in CUA 220,464 0.9% 0.0% Minimum Allowable CSA (3) 470,000 1.8% 1.8% + Increase in CUA (15) 220,464 0.9% 0.0% (16)= Critical Stock Allowance (CSA) 690,464 2.7% 0 1.8% Gross New Production (14) 2,496,179 9.8% 7.7% - No increase in CUA (15) 220,464 0.9% 0.0% (17)= Net New Production (CUA) 2,275,715 8.9% 0 0.0% CUA (17) 2,275,715 8.9%1,955,775 7.7% + CSA (16) 690,464 2.7%1,028,108 4.0% = Total 2,966,179 11.6%2,983,883 11.7% received actual end of year data which allowed use of existing framework for calculating available stocks Calculate "available stocks" Proposed Rule

Calculate New Production (=CUA)

Calculate total amount allocated Calculate carryover
Calculate gross new production

Calculate increase in year to year new production

Calculate CSA Final Rule New 2010 authorizations from the Parties

Calculate supply chain factor

## 2010 CUE Calculations (proposed and final)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA :

No. 2:04-MJ-522

v. : (Jacob P. Hart, U.S.M.J.)

:

LARKEN ROSE, : (related to 2:05-CR-101,

 Michael M. Baylson, J.)

Defendant. : FILED ELECTRONICALLY

DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL

_______OF MOTION TO RETURN PROPERTY_______

The defendant, Larken Rose ("Movant"), moves with the

consent of the United States for voluntary dismissal of his

Motion to Return Property, on the ground of mootness. In

support of his motion, he states:

1. On February 15, 2008, Movant filed a motion for return

of property, seeking an order directing the FBI to retrieve from

local authorities and return to Movant property taken by the FBI

from Movant’s home at this Court’s direction, and then entrusted

to those local authorities by the FBI on the FBI’s own initiative. The property was neither seized by the local authorities

nor held by them at this Court’s direction. 

2. By endorsement dated March 3, 2008, the Court granted

the United States an extension of time until March 23, 2008, to

respond to the motion, in light of the government’s representation that it was attempting an informal resolution.

3. On March 14, 2008, the government returned to the

defendant all of the property which was the subject of his

pending motion.

-1-

Case 2:04-mj-00522-UJ Document 29 Filed 03/18/08 Page 1 of 2
WHEREFORE, the defendant prays that this Court mark the

motion voluntarily dismissed as moot. 

Respectfully submitted,

Dated: March 18, 2008

s/Peter Goldberger

SO ORDERED, this By: PETER GOLDBERGER 

____ day of March, 2008, PA Atty. No. 22364

BY THE COURT: 50 Rittenhouse Place

Ardmore, PA 19003

________________________ (610) 649-8200

 , J. fax: (610) 649-8362

e-mail: peter.goldberger@verizon.net

Attorney for Deft. Larken Rose

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

On March 18, 2008, I served a copy of the foregoing

document on counsel for the United States by copy of electronic

filing, addressed to:

Floyd J. Miller, Esq.

Assistant U.S. Attorney

615 Chestnut St., Suite 1250 

Philadelphia, PA 19106

__s/Peter Goldberger___________

-2-

Case 2:04-mj-00522-UJ Document 29 Filed 03/18/08 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : Date of

: Notice: 4/4/2019

v. :

Demetrius Anderson : CRIMINAL NO. 2004-278/2004-552

227 Fairfield Street

New Haven, CT 06515

TAKE NOTICE that the Hearing scheduled on April 4, 2019 has been postponed to May 1, 

2019 at 3:00 p.m. in the United States District Court, United States Courthouse, 601 Market Street,

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, before the Honorable Paul S. Diamond, in Courtroom 14A, 14th 

Floor.

Very truly yours,

Lenora Kashner Wittje

Deputy Clerk to Judge Paul S. Diamond

267-299-7739

INTERPRETER REQUIRED

THIS PROCEEDING HAS BEEN RESCHEDULED FROM, Click here to enter a date.

Notice to:

Defendant

 Rossman D. Thompson, Defense

Albert S. Glenn, A.U.S.A.

U.S. Marshal 

 Probation Office 

Pretrial Services

 Crystal Wardlaw

Cr 4 (rev. 8/97)

Case 2:04-cr-00278-PD Document 53 Filed 04/04/19 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1
 ELECTRO-OPTICAL SCIENCES, INC.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  /s/ Joseph V. GulfoJoseph V. GulfoPresident and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)November 6, 2008/s/ Richard I. SteinhartRichard I. SteinhartVice President & Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)November 6, 2008 
 *
    
    A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 has been provided to Electro-Optical Sciences, Inc. and will be retained by
Electro-Optical Sciences, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its
staff upon request. This written statement accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is
not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and will not be incorporated by
reference into any filing of Electro-Optical Sciences, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933
or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, irrespective of any general incorporation language
contained in such filing. 41
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

 

MATTIE ANGEL,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

BAYER CORPORATION, et al.,

 Defendants.

 

CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-4136

 

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 1st day of July, 2002, the court having been previously advised

that the above action cannot proceed to trial and disposition because of the following reason:

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending disposition of a related action.

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending determination of arbitration

proceedings.

[ ] - Interlocutory appeal filed 

[X] - Other: Cases are placed into suspense pending receipt of the Case Transfer

Order from the Judicial Panel on Multi District Litigation transferring

cases to District of Minnesota. 

it is

ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall mark this action closed for statistical purposes

and place the matter in the Civil Suspense File, and it is 

FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction; and that the case be

restored to the trial docket when the action is in a status so that it may proceed to final 

Case 2:02-cv-04136-MK Document 2 Filed 07/01/2002 Page 1 of 2
disposition; this order shall not prejudice the rights of the parties to this litigation.

BY THE COURT:

______________________________

MARVIN KATZ, S.J.

Case 2:02-cv-04136-MK Document 2 Filed 07/01/2002 Page 2 of 2
NONCONFIDENTIAL // EXTERNAL

GWA SUPERVISOR ENROLLMENT FORM

This form is used to establish or revoke GWA supervisor designation, which enables the designee to request for access to 

the CARS and GTAS applications. 

 Check one: Establish New Access Revoke Existing Access 

Section I – New/Revoked GWA Supervisor Information

Name: 

*You should have an existing Identity in SailPoint Identity IQ.. To establish an Identity visit https://iiq.fiscal.treasury.gov

Section II – Approval to Establish New/Revoke Existing GWA Supervisor Account

NOTE: The individual approving this request should be the manager of the above-named user who is requesting the 

GWA supervisor designation, or for whom supervisor designation is being revoked. This approver is not required to 

have access.

Approver Name: 

Email: 

Signature: 

Submit your completed form to the Treasury Support Center via email GWA@stls.frb.org

This form is in compliance with the Privacy Act of 1974 (Section 552a, 5 U.S.C., Section 301, 5 U.S.C., Section 3105, 44 U.S.C., 18 U.S.C. 3056), 

and the Treasury Departmental Offices Directive DO 216. The information you provide on this form will be used principally to aid in the completion 

of your access request to Fiscal Service systems. All or part of this information may be furnished to Federal, State, local and public agencies in the 

event a violation of law is disclosed. Completion of this form is voluntary; however, failure to complete the form requested will result in no 

consideration for access to Fiscal Service systems. Although no penalties are authorized if you do not provide the requested information, failure to 

supply information will result in your not receiving access to Fiscal Service systems.

Supervisor Enrollment Form - For GWA Applications – updated 5/8/2023

Work Phone:

Organization/Agency 

Email Address: 

Date:
Case 2:02-cv-04074-BWK Document 4 Filed 08/27/2002 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:02-cv-04074-BWK Document 4 Filed 08/27/2002 Page 2 of 2
Several of the SOCC tables, most notably those in Part 2, are based on data submitted in ARMIS (Automated Reporting and Management System).  The Zip Files contain word porcessing and spreadsheet files.

**2006/2007 SOCC.** Released 09/10.News Release | Table of Contents | Report (PDF) | Zip Files

**2005/2006 SOCC.**Released 06/08.News Release | Table of Contents | Report (PDF) | Zip Files

**2004/2005 SOCC.**Released 11/05.News Release | Table of Contents | Report (PDF) | Zip Files

**2003/2004 SOCC.**Released 10/04.Table of Contents | Report (PDF) | Zip Files

**2002/2003 SOCC.**Released 03/04.Table of Contents | Report (PDF) | Zip Files

**Preliminary 2002/2003 SOCC**. Released 11/03.Report (PDF)

**2001/2002 SOCC.** Released 09/02.Table of Contents | Report (PDF) | Zip Files

**2000/2001 SOCC.** Released 09/01.Table of Contents | Report (PDF) | Zip Files

**1999/2000 SOCC.** Released 08/00.Table of Contents | Report (PDF) | Zip Files

**1998/1999 SOCC.** Released 12/99.Table of Contents | Report (PDF) | Zip Files

**1997/1998 SOCC.** Released 11/98.Table of Contents | Report (PDF) | Zip Files

**1996/1997 SOCC.**Released 12/97.Table of Contents | Report (PDF) | Zip Files

**1995/1996 SOCC.**Released 11/96.Table of Contents | Report (PDF) | Zip Files

**1994/1995 SOCC. **Released 12/95.Table of Contents | Report (PDF) | Zip Files

**1993/1994 SOCC** (PDF)**1992/1993 SOCC **(PDF)**1991/1992 SOCC** (PDF)**1990/1991 SOCC **(PDF)**1989/1990 SOCC **(PDF)**1988/1989 SOCC **(PDF)**1987 SOCC **(PDF)**1986 SOCC** (PDF)**1985 SOCC **(PDF)**1984 SOCC **(PDF)**1983 SOCC **(PDF)**1982 SOCC **(PDF)**1981 SOCC **(PDF)**1980 SOCC **(PDF)

**SOCCs Reports Prior to 1980**

 

**Bureau/Office:**

Wireline Competition

:
                    - Data, Maps, Reports  Reports 

**Updated:**

## Related Links

IATD Data & Reports