alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Daniel Ruthenberg-Marshall

druthmar@gmail.com
My name is Daniel Marshall, and I'm a freelance videographer based in the DC area.
A cousin of mine recently gave birth to a beautiful baby boy also named Daniel. He's not named after me, but he's still a bundle of joy and the best behaved baby you'II ever meet.
While my cousin was pregnant, I remember her talking about some of the things she wasn't supposed to be doing. Among them was eating seafood, and I thought about our coal-fired power plants emitting tens of thousands of pounds of inercury into the atmosphere each year, and how that mercury rains down and contaminates our waterways and poisons our fish. Not enough that the average person would notice, but definitely enough for baby Daniel to notice.
We welcomed Daniel into this world in June, and I'm happy to say that my cousin is fortunate enough to live in a neighborhood far away from any coal-fired power plant, and Daniel's risk of getting Asthma isn't significanby increased. But what about all the children who are being bom every day and growing up in neighborhoods where asthma and cancer rates are going through the roof? Those children aren't afForded the same opportunities as Daniel, because we as a society can't get our act together.
I sometimes wonder what would happen to Daniel if he had been bom in Beijing, where some days the air quality is so poor you can't see across the street. Hundreds of babies are being bom every day in that city and breathing that toxic air as their first breath on this beautiful planet we call earth, breathing deep and taking in some of the worst air on the planet. Those babies got truly unlucky being bom into that situation, into a country that isn't free and to a people who cannot advocate for themselves without fear of persecution.
Here, we have that unalienable right to speak up and be heard, but what good is it if you, our government, does not listen? What happens if you ignore the will of the people, if you ignore common sense, if you ignore the in

- efutable science that illustrates the necessity of these regulations? Will our air continue to worsen? Will it eventually sink to such levels that everyone can physically SEE the danger they face with every breath?
Sometimes I like to believe that we live in a functional Republic, where the govemment answers to the people, instead of this quagmire we currenby find ourselves surrounded by in this great city. Thankfully, in this case, it's a small, easy step to take. You have the power to finalize this rule, and you have the moral obligation to do so.
For my sake. For baby Daniel's sake. For the sake of every single person in this beautiful country, I hope you finalize this rule and help us guarantee a clean and safe atmosphere for generations to come. Thank you.
No. 51594.

#### Protests 984495-G, etc., of Friedman Co. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of beads similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Eitinger Bead Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(17 Cust. Ct. 56, C. D. 1020) and *Eitinger Bead Co.*v. *United States*(13 Cust. Ct. 50, C. D. 867). In accordance therewith the claim at 35 percent under paragraph 1503, or at 20 percent under the same paragraph, as modified by T. D. 49458, was sustained.
**Exhibit 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Dmitry Beinus, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Shoe Pavilion, Inc. for the period ended April 3, 2004; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of amaterial fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiary, is made known to us by others within that entity, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of April 3, 2004, based on such evaluation; and 

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during theregistrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’sinternal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: May 17, 2004
# C_2018408EN.01000801.xml

| 12.11.2018 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 408/8 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

12.11.2018

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 408/8

---

Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 13 September 2018 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato — Italy) — Enzo Buccioni v Banca d’Italia

(Case C-594/16) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Approximation of laws - Directive 2013/36/EU - Article 53(1) - Obligation of professional secrecy on national authorities charged with prudential supervision of credit institutions - Credit institution which is being compulsorily wound up - Disclosure of confidential information in civil or commercial proceedings))

(2018/C 408/07)

Language of the case: Italian

Referring court

Consiglio di Stato

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Enzo Buccioni

Defendant: Banca d’Italia

Intervener: Banca Network Investimenti SpA, in liquidation

Operative part of the judgment

Article 53(1) of Directive 2013/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on access to the activity of credit institutions and the prudential supervision of credit institutions and investment firms, amending Directive 2002/87/EC and repealing Directives 2006/48/EC and 2006/49/EC, must be interpreted as not precluding the competent authorities of the Member States from disclosing confidential information to a person who so requests in order to be able to institute civil or commercial proceedings with a view to protecting proprietary interests which were prejudiced as a result of the compulsory liquidation of a credit institution. However, the request for disclosure must relate to information in respect of which the applicant puts forward precise and consistent evidence plausibly suggesting that it is relevant for the purposes of civil or commercial proceedings, the subject matter of which must be specifically identified by the applicant and without which the information in question cannot be used. It is for the competent authorities and courts to weigh up the interest of the applicant in having the information in question and the interests connected with maintaining the confidentiality of the information covered by the obligation of professional secrecy, before disclosing each piece of confidential information requested.

---

(1)  OJ C 63, 27.2.2017.

---
---

|**Exhibit 32.1**                                 
|-------------------------------------------------
|                                                 
|**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO**                    
|**18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**                       
|**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**                       
|**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

In  connection with this report of Alternet Systems Inc. (the “Company”) on Form  10-KSB/A No. 5  for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities  and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “ Report”), I, Henryk Dabrowski, certify, pursuant to Section 906  of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted), that:

| | 1. | The  Report on Form 10KSB/A No. 5  fully complies with the requirements of Section  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                                          
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                         
| | 2. | The  information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects,  the financial condition and results of operations of the Company at the end of  the periods covered by the Report.

|Dated: October 6, 2008 | By: | /s/
      Henryk Dabrowski
|---------------------- | --- | --------------------------
|                       |     | Henryk Dabrowski          
|                       |     | Chief Executive Officer   

---
October 9, 1957

No. 61256.

protest 285185-K.

#### Theo. L. Stern & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Plaintiff’s application for rehearing denied. The following memorandum accompanied the order denying motion for rehearing:

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This protest was the subject of our decision in *Theo. L. Stern & Co., Inc.*v. *United States,*39 Cust. Ct. 404, Abstract 61155 (decided August 21, 1957). The ease comes before us at this time on plaintiff’s motion for rehearing.

The merchandise in question is identified herein as plastic angels, plastic dwarfs, and plastic elfs. They were classified, by similitude, as articles of cellulose ace.-tate, and are claimed to be properly dutiable as nonenumerated manufactured articles.

The parties stipulated that the articles in question are in chief value of polystyrene and that they are used as ornaments or markers on cakes. In addition to the agreed facts, there was incorporated herein the record in *B. Shackman & Company et al.*v. *United States,*38 Cust. Ct. 30, C. D. 1839.

In our decision, Abstract 61155, *supra,*we held the merchandise to be properly classifiable, by similitude, as articles of cellulose acetate, as assessed by the collector. Plaintiff, in its memorandum in support of the motion for rehearing, states “that the decision is inconsistent with the case of *Shackman*v. *United States,*C. D. 1839,” and contends that the cited case supplies ample authority for holding *456that the articles in question are properly classifiable as nonenumerated manufactured articles, as claimed. We do not agree with plaintiff’s contention.

At the outset, it should be emphasized that the present case is not on all fours with the *B. Bhachman & Company et al.*case, *supra.*In that case, the merchandise consisted of polystyrene paper weights which the collector classified, by similitude, as articles of glass, blown or partly blown in the mold. Plaintiff made two claims, i. e., as articles of cellulose acetate, by similitude; or, nonenumerated manufactured articles. In the present case, the collector classified this merchandise, by similitude, as articles of cellulose acetate, and plaintiff seeks classification as nonenumerated manufactured articles. Our decision, Abstract 61155, *supra,*follows the reasoning applied and the conclusion reached in the *B. Shackman & Company et al.*case, *supra,*so far as it affects the particular issue presented herein. Plaintiff, in its argument for rehearing, points to the phase of the cited case, relating to the collector’s classification as articles of glass, blown or partly blown in the mold, and the claim for classification as nonenumerated manufactured articles. That issue is not before us, and the discussion with reference thereto in the incorporated case has no bearing on the outcome of the present case.

An ORDER will issue denying plaintiff’s motion for rehearing.
Exhibit 10.4
AMENDMENT NO.1 TO THE 2017 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN
This AMENDMENT NO.1 TO THE 2017 EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN (this “Amendment”) is approved and adopted by the Compensation Committee (the “Committee”) of the Board of Directors of Progyny, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), as of December 17, 2020 (the “Effective Date”).
WHEREAS:
(A)       The Company has previously made Awards to Participants under the Company’s 2017 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Plan”; capitalized terms used herein without definition have the meanings specified in the Plan), which Plan governs the terms of such grants.
(B)       The Committee considers it to be in the best interest of the Company to amend the Plan to provide for full and immediate vesting of outstanding Options granted to a Participant under the Plan in the event that such Participant’s Continuous Service ends as a result of such Participant’s death.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:
1.         AMENDMENT TO THE PLAN
Options and Stock Appreciation Rights: Section 5(f) of the Plan is hereby amended by inserting the following at the end thereof: “Effective December 17, 2020, notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in an Option Agreement, the vesting of an Option held by a Participant shall accelerate in full in the event that such Participant’s Continuous Service ends as a result of such Participant’s death”.
2.         MISCELLANEOUS
2.1       Effectiveness. The amendment pursuant to this Amendment shall become effective as of the Effective Date.
2.2       Relationship to and Effect on the Plan.
(a)       Except as expressly amended hereby, in all other respects, the terms and conditions of the Plan shall remain in full force and effect and are hereby ratified and confirmed.
(b)       This Amendment is supplemental to, and shall be read as one with, the Plan.  This Amendment may not be amended, changed or modified except in writing the Committee.
2.3       Governing Law. This Amendment shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State of Delaware.
DATE OF NOTICE: August 20, 2002

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Timothy Doris : Civil Action No.: 02-2751

:

 v. : 

 :

Marriott International, Inc. :

NOTICE

Please be advised that a STATUS CONFERENCE will be held by telephone on

Thursday, August 22, 2002, at 3:00 p.m. with the Honorable Michael M. Baylson. Counsel for

Plaintiff will initiate the telephone conference and when all counsel are on the line, call Chambers

at (267) 299.7520.

If trial counsel in this case is unavailable at the time of the conference, another attorney in

trial counsel’s office, who should be familiar with the case, is required to appear at the conference. 

The conference will be continued to another date only if no attorney familiar with the case is

available.

 

Lenora Kashner

Deputy Clerk to Judge Baylson

267.299.7529

cc: Thomas S. Farnish, Esquire (via fax)

Gregory J. Kelley, Esquire (via fax)

N:\Scheduling - Judge Baylson\Doris Status Conference for 8-22-02.wpd

Case 2:02-cv-02751-MMB Document 10 Filed 08/20/2002 Page 1 of 1
No. 51919.

#### Wonder Bottlers Supply & Repair Co. *v.*United States,

protest 65152-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the' court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on the entry. The protest was sustained to this extent.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

DAISY BUSH :

: CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-CV-4140

Plaintiff, :

:

v. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION;

BAYER AG;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE;

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM

:

:

:

:

:

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

:

Defendants. :

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of the Court:

Kindly enter the appearances of Hope S. Freiwald, Aline Fairweather, Erin

Brennan and Kirstin J. Miller as attorneys for defendant SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a

GlaxoSmithKline.

Respectfully Submitted,

_____________________________ _____________________________

Hope S. Freiwald Aline Fairweather

_____________________________ _____________________________

Erin Brennan Kirstin J. Miller

DECHERT PRICE & RHOADS

4000 Bell Atlantic Tower

1717 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2793

(215) 994-4000

Case 2:02-cv-04140-LP Document 7 Filed 09/16/2002 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date:  August 8, 2008
    By:
    /s/ C. S. LiollioC. S. LiollioPresident and Chief Executive Officer
OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OFTEXAS
AUSTIN /- GWLD c. MANN April 15, 1939 *mm .**U*L

Honorable B. A. Hodgesv b+idvNv CountyAuditor Georgetown, Texas 4)"'
Dear Sir: i.

we are in reok&pt 0r in you request our oplnlo for the oonsolldatlon of out 0r the generel,mnd tewmos fuuds ar’the dia d to ’ you on Januai-y 87, Statutes w&expreresd an eledtion r0r' sahool. uld’ **be** paid’ their oam~ general Suud, In ‘that penaes ‘incurred ln sone paid’ put oi. the Wallto such districts for the ation is held, or out of funds. tnert ensuing flseal pear,

” .~

the genera fund ‘of the’~oouuty. Onthe k740b Revised Civil Statutes enaated in .in itb terms and ‘providea’ that wall expenses ,atlon with or inoidental to any sob001 dlstriot eleotlouv shall be paid out of the available maintenance fund belonging to the distriot holdiug the eleOtiOIl, Our answar to your question, therefore, is that all of the espenees whiah may be lnodrred in oouneatlon with the election which you mention should be paid out of the available maiutenauos fund of the respective districts holding the elections. Yours very truly
# C_2017277EN.01001702.xml

| 21.8.2017 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 277/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.8.2017

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 277/17

---

Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 15 June 2017 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Nederlandstalige rechtbank van eerste aanleg Brussel — Belgium) — T.KUP SAS v Belgische Staat

(Case C-349/16) (1)

1

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Dumping - Regulation (EC) No 1472/2006 - Imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in China and Vietnam - Validity of Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1294/2009 - Expiry review of anti-dumping measures - Unrelated importers - Sampling - European Union interest))

(2017/C 277/23)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Referring court

Nederlandstalige rechtbank van eerste aanleg Brussel

Parties to the main proceedings

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: T.KUP SAS

Applicant:

Defendant: Belgische Staat

Defendant:

Operative part of the judgment

Operative part of the judgment

The examination of the questions referred has disclosed nothing capable of affecting the validity of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 1294/2009 of 22 December 2009 imposing a definitive anti-dumping duty on imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather originating in Vietnam and originating in the People's Republic of China, as extended to imports of certain footwear with uppers of leather consigned from the Macao SAR, whether declared as originating in the Macao SAR or not, following an expiry review pursuant to Article 11(2) of Council Regulation (EC) No 384/96.

---

(1)  OJ C 335, 12.9.2016.

1

---
# C_2015254EN.01002101.xml

| 3.8.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 254/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 254/21

---

Action brought on 18 June 2015 — Italy v Commission

(Case T-317/15)

(2015/C 254/24)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Italian Republic (represented by: P. Gentili, avvocato dello Stato, and G. Palmieri, acting as Agent)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the notice of competition EPSO/AD/302/15 — Administrators (AD 5) in the field of Audit; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the notice of competition EPSO/AD/302/15 — Administrators (AD 5) in the field of Audit;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments relied on by the applicant are those raised in Case T-17/15 Italian Republic v Commission (OJ 2015 C 81, p. 27).

Italian Republic

Commission

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 07-6094

LLOYD EUGENE BROWN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JOSE A. SERANNO; REX BLOCKER; RICHARD FRICKEY;

LOUSIA ROSARIO; GARY FAVOUR, Nurse; UNITED

STATES ATTORNEY FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH

CAROLINA; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED

STATES,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Charleston. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.

(2:05-cv-03342-RBH)

Submitted: June 29, 2007 Decided: September 4, 2007

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Lloyd Eugene Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens,

OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
- 2 -

PER CURIAM:

Lloyd Eugene Brown appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six

Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388

(1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Brown v. Seranno, No. 2:05-cv-03342-RBH (D.S.C. filed

Nov. 30, 2006 & entered Dec. 1, 2006). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would not

aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 56955.

#### Star Jewelry Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 139237-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of jewelry in chief value of artificial flowers the same in all material respects as that the subject of *Coro, Inc.*v. *United States*(39 C. C. P. A. 154, C. A. D. 478), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.