alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
(Reap. Dec. 10916)

#### Elof Hansson, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 886911, etc.

(Decided March 16, 1965)

*Sharp & Bogan*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendent.

Rao, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, annexed to this decision and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED hy the undersigned, subject to the approval of the Court:

> 1. That the subject merchandise consists of hardboard exported from Sweden as to which the Secretary of the Treasury issued a finding of dumping, published in 89 TD 197, TD 53567, made pursuant to the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C. 160, et sea.).

> 2. That pursuant to section 168 of said Antidumping Act, the appraiser reported the purchase price (Sec. 162) and the foreign market value (Sec. 164) as to the merchandise listed on Schedule A attached hereto and made a part hereof.

> 3. That pursuant to Sections 500 and 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, the appraiser appraised all of the merchandise in the appeals for appraisement enumerated on Schedule A for regular duty purposes.

> 4. That the plaintiff duly filed appeals for reappraisement as to the values referred to in the above paragraphs Nos. 2 and 3.

> 5. That at the times relevant herein the purchase price and the foreign market value under the said Antidumping Act are as specified in the aforesaid Schedule A attached hereto.

> 6. That as to all other items of merchandise not identified on Schedule A, the appraiser’s reports of purchase price and of foreign market value are correct.

> 7. That the appraiser’s findings of value under the provisions of Section 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, are correct.

> 8. That said appeals are submitted for decision upon this stipulation and said Schedule A.

Upon the agreed facts, I find foreign market value, as defined in section 164 of the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C. § 164), for the merchandise described in said schedule A, and the purchase price *559thereof, within section 162 of said act (19 U.S.C. § 162), to be as indicated in said schedule. As to all other items of merchandise not identified in schedule A, I find the foreign market values and purchase prices to be as reported by the appraiser. In all other respects, the values of all merchandise are as returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

December 20, 2010 

p1213 

Order 

 

December 20, 2010 

141734 

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN, 

Plaintiff-Appellee, 

v SC: 141734 

 COA: 290284 

Wayne CC: 08-002783-FC 

JAMES CONNER, 

 Defendant-Appellant. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 19, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not 

persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
EXHIBIT 31  CERTIFICATION  I, Robert Rosner, certify that:  1.     I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of Wataire International, Inc. for the year ended September 30, 2006;  2.     Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4.     The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:  a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;  b)   Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and  c)   Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to           materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and  5.   The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and  b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting.  Date:  January 19, 2007   By: /s/  Robert Rosner ------------------------------- Robert Rosner, Chief Executive Officer
No. 55822.

protests 127037-K and 127038-K (New York).

#### Geo. B. Zaloom & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

*302Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of rugs and carpets exported from Iran between the dates of December 21, 1939, and September 26, 1941, and that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in Abstract 54056. In accordance with stipulation and pursuant to the instructions contained in T. D. 51892, the collector was directed to reliquidate the entries, converting the currency of the invoices, Iranian rials, into United States dollars at the rate of $.053475 as to alt items, except such as were exported for the benefit of drawback.
# C_2015245EN.01004401.xml

| 27.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 245/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 245/44

---

Appeal brought on 8 June 2015 by Ángel Coedo Suárez against the judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal of 26 March 2015 in Case F-38/14, Coedo Suárez v Council

(Case T-297/15 P)

(2015/C 245/53)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: Ángel Coedo Suárez (Brussels, Belgium) (represented by S. Rodrigues and C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: Council of the European Union

Other party to the proceedings:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The appellant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare the present appeal admissible; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare the present appeal admissible;

| — | set aside the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 26 March 2015 in Coedo Suárez v Council (F-38/14, EU:F:2015:25); |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 26 March 2015 in Coedo Suárez v Council (F-38/14, EU:F:2015:25);

Coedo Suárez

Council

| — | grant the application for annulment made by the appellant at first instance; |
| --- | --- |

—

grant the application for annulment made by the appellant at first instance;

| — | order the Council to pay the costs of both sets of proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council to pay the costs of both sets of proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the appeal, the appellant relies on two pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging a distortion of the facts and evidence, and an error of law, in that the Civil Service Tribunal held that the appointing authority had not committed a manifest error of assessment in finding that the appellant’s ill health did not constitute an extenuating circumstance. |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging a distortion of the facts and evidence, and an error of law, in that the Civil Service Tribunal held that the appointing authority had not committed a manifest error of assessment in finding that the appellant’s ill health did not constitute an extenuating circumstance.

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging infringement of the duty to state reasons. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging infringement of the duty to state reasons.

---
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 13

- 00004

- CV
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.

v. DWIGHT EISENHAUER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS INDEPENDENT EXECUTOR OF

THE ESTATE OF LORENE BELCHER WALTER, DECEASED

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No

. 1 of Nueces County , Texas

Trial Cause No. 05

- 61652

- 1

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed . The Court orders the judgment of the trial court AFFIRMED . Costs of the app eal are adjudged against appellant. We further order this decision certified below for observance. May 15, 2014
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

: CIVIL ACTION NOS.

:

STANFORD : 02-3874

RAYMOND : 02-3880

LOVE, et al. : 02-3912

JAY, et al. : 02-3923

JOHENGEN, et al. : 02-3943

MCDONALD : 02-3963

CRISOSTOMO : 02-3982

SANTOS : 02-4106

TRACEY, et al. : 02-4115

COSENZA : 02-4146

HOOD, et al. : 02-4154

PICKNER : 02-4213

BROWN, et al. : 02-4224

EWING, et al. : 02-4226

RIGEL, et al. : 02-4259

SANTOS : 02-4284

GARCIA : 02-4311

EVANS, et al. : 02-4316

:

VS. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION, et al. :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of July, 2002, the Court having been previously

advised that the above action cannot proceed to trial and disposition because of the following

reason:

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending disposition of a related

action.

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending determination of

arbitration proceedings.

[ ] - Interlocutory appeal filed.

Case 2:02-cv-04154-BWK Document 2 Filed 07/11/2002 Page 1 of 2
[ X ] - Other: Case is placed into suspense pending receipt of the Case

Transfer Order from the Judicial Panel on Multi District Litigation

transferring case to District of Minnesota..

It is

ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this action closed for statistical purposes and

place the matter in the Civil Suspense File, and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction; and that the case be

restored to the trial docket when the action is in a status so that it may proceed to final

disposition; this order shall not prejudice the rights of the parties to this litigation.

BY THE COURT:

________________________________________

Bruce W. Kauffman, Judge

Case 2:02-cv-04154-BWK Document 2 Filed 07/11/2002 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES

v.

SANDY GLUCKSMAN

CRIMINAL ACTION

NO. 03-757-02

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 29th day of July, 2014, upon consideration of Government’s Motion to 

Dismiss Indictment (Document No. 240, filed October 10, 2012), the Motion having been 

misplaced and not brought to the attention of the undersigned Judge until July 28, 2014, and the 

Government having confirmed on July 28, 2014, that defendant, Sandy Glucksman, was still a 

fugitive, and that it was appropriate to dismiss the Indictment against her under those 

circumstances, IT IS ORDERED that the Government’s Motion to Dismiss Indictment is 

GRANTED, and the Superseding Indictment against defendant, Sandy Glucksman, is 

DISMISSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Hon. Jan E. DuBois

 DuBOIS, JAN E., J.

Case 2:03-cr-00757-JD Document 241 Filed 07/29/14 Page 1 of 1
# C_2016090EN.01002001.xml

| 7.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 90/20 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 90/20

---

Action brought on 23 November 2015 — Novartis v OHIM (Representation of a crescent in green and white)

(Case T-679/15)

(2016/C 090/27)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Novartis AG (Basel, Switzerland) (represented by: M. Zintler, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark (Representation of a crescent in green and white) — Application for registration No 13 189 139

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 23 September 2015 in Case R 78/2015-5

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | declare that Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 does not preclude the sign at issue (Community trade mark No 13 189 139) in respect of the goods in Class 5 described in the application for registration; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 does not preclude the sign at issue (Community trade mark No 13 189 139) in respect of the goods in Class 5 described in the application for registration;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Plea(s) in law

Plea(s) in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-1037

BETTY JANE AYERS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

SHEETZ, INC.,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern 

District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert C. Chambers, 

Chief District Judge. (3:11-cv-00434)

Submitted: September 24, 2013 Decided: September 26, 2013

Before NIEMEYER and THACKER, Circuit Judges, HAMILTON, Senior 

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Betty Jane Ayers, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin Todd Hughes, 

PULLIN, FOWLER, FLANAGAN, BROWN & POE, PLLC, Charleston, West 

Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Betty Jane Ayers appeals the district court’s order 

entering judment in favor of the Defendant/Appellee in 

accordance with the jury’s verdict. We have reviewed the 

record, including the transcript of the trial and find no 

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. We deny Ayers’ 

motion to vacate judgment and grant the Appellee’s motion to 

submit on briefs. We dispense with oral argument because the 

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the 

materials before this court and argument would not aid the 

decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 64751.

#### Waldburger *&*Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 292170-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of waterproof cotton cloth similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. *D. H. Grant & Co., Inc.*(47 C.C.P.A. 20, C.A.D. 723), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     The undersigned, Robert Rosner, the Chief Executive Officer of Cimbix
Corporation (the "Company"), DOES HEREBY CERTIFY,pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002, that:

     1.     The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended
September 30, 2005 (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.     The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

     IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this statement this 2nd
day of March 2006.


                                  By:  /s/ Robert Rosner
                                  --------------------------------
                                           Robert Rosner,
                                           Chief Executive Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Spectra Energy Capital, LLC on Form 10-Q for the period
ending March 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Sabra L. Harrington, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Controller of Spectra Energy Capital, LLC, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Spectra Energy Capital, LLC.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                   |  |                                                       
|------------------ |  | ------------------------------------------------------
|                   |  |                                                       
|Date: May 15, 2007 |  | /s/ SABRA L. HARRINGTON                               
|                   |  | Sabra L. Harrington                                   
|                   |  | Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Controller
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

NOTICE OF PROCEDURES FOR SUBMITTING REACTIVE POWER FILINGS

(December 5, 2016)

Take notice that the Commission established procedures in Armstrong Power, 

LLC, 156 FERC ¶ 61,009, at PP 21-23 (2016)1 to be followed in making reactive power 

rate filings, including required informational filings. 

Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr.,

Deputy Secretary.

 1 Available at

http://elibrary.ferc.gov/IDMWS/common/opennat.asp?fileID=14297574. 

20161205-3025 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 12/05/2016
Document Content(s)

MS120516-Reactive.DOCX................................................1-1

20161205-3025 FERC PDF (Unofficial) 12/05/2016
CERTIFICATION  PURSUANT  TO
                  SECTION  302  OF  THE  SARBANES-OXLEY  ACT  OF  2002

I,  MAHESH  JAYANARAYAN,  certify  that:

1.  I  have  reviewed  this  Annual  report  for  the  period  ending  June  30,
2005  of  New  Medium  Enterprises,  Inc.;

2.  Based  on  my  knowledge,  this  Annual  report  does not contain any untrue
statement  of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the  statements  made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were  made,  not  misleading  with  respect to the period covered by this Annual
report;

3.  Based  on  my  knowledge,  the  financial  statements,  and  other financial
information  included  in  this  Annual  report,  fairly present in all material
respects  the  financial  condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant  as  of,  and  for,  the  periods  presented  in this Annual  report.

4.  I  am  responsible  for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures  (as  defined  in  Exchange  Act  Rules  13a-14  and  15d-15) for the
registrant  for  the  UK  office  and  have:

a)  designed  such  disclosure  controls  and procedures to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
is  made  known  to  us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period  in  which  this  Annual  report  is  being  prepared;


b)  evaluated  the  effectiveness  of  the  registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures  as  of  a  date  within  90  days  prior  to the filing date of this
Annual  report  (the  "Evaluation  Date");  and

c)  presented  in  this Annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of
the  disclosure  controls  and  procedures  based  on  our  evaluation as of the
Evaluation  Date;

5.  I  have  disclosed,  based on my most recent evaluation, to the registrant's
auditors  and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing  the  equivalent  functions):

a)  all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls
which  could  adversely  affect  the  registrant's  ability  to record, process,
summarize  and  report  financial  data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors  any  material  weaknesses  in  internal  controls;  and

b)  any  fraud,  whether  or  not  material,  that  involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and

6.  I  have  indicated  in  this  Annual  report  whether  or  not  there  were
significant  changes  in  internal  controls  or  in  other  factors  that could
significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent
evaluation,  including  any  corrective  actions  with  regard  to  significant
deficiencies  and  material  weaknesses.

October  28,  2005
                           By:  /s/  MAHESH  JAYANARAYAN,
                           -----------------------
                           Chief  Executive  Officer