alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 12.2**

**SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION**

I, Huang Xianfang, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of China Linen Textile Industry, Ltd.

2.   Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

4.

The company's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have:

a.  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared;

b.  Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principals; 

c.  Evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluations; and

d.  Disclosed in this report any change in the company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company's internal control over financial reporting: and 

5.

The company's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company's auditors and the audit committee of the company's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a.  All significant deficiencies and material weakness in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the company's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b.  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the company’s internal controls over financial reporting.
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Shoe Pavilion, Inc. (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended October 2, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dmitry Beinus, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and I,
John D. Hellmann, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                       
|---------------------------------------
|/s/ Dmitry Beinus                      
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer   
|November 15, 2004                      
|                                       
|/s/ John D. Hellmann                   
|Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
|November 15, 2004                      



This certification accompanies the
Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
No. 65391.

#### Ross Products, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 60/25910 and 60/25911 (New York).

*402Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise marked “D” consists of dice the same in all material respects as those the subject of .Abstract 64186, the first claim of the plaintiff was sustained. The items marked “A,” stipulated to consists of dish mops similar to those the subject of Abstract 64603, were held dutiable, as claimed, at 20 percent under paragraph 923, as modified, *supra.*
Before the Second Division,

March 18, 1968

No. P68/149.

protest 64/12861 (San Francisco).

#### Allied Western Dist., Inc., and H. B. Thomas *v.*United States,

Rao, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of electric swizzle stick mixers similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Bloomfield*Industries, *Inc.*v. *United States*(54 Cust. Ct. 287, Abstract 68974), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Before the Third Division,

April 30, 1962

No. 66721.

#### Haruta & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 61/18475 and 61/18466 (New York).

*435Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of earthenware eggcups similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Ross Products, Inc.*v. *United States*(46 Cust. Ct. 8, C.D. 2226), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# C_2015118EN.01004401.xml

| 13.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/44 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/44

---

Action brought on 23 February 2015 — Niagara Bottling v OHIM (NIAGARA)

(Case T-89/15)

(2015/C 118/56)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Niagara Bottling LLC (Ontario, United States) (represented by: M. Edenborough, QC)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Trade mark at issue: International registration No 1 153 535 designating the European Union in respect of the word mark ‘NIAGARA’

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 12 December 2014 in Case R 784/2014-5

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         I, Scott D. Dorfman, Chief Executive Officer of Innotrac Corporation
(the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 as adopted by ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly
         period ended September 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the
         requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
         of 1934; and

(2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Company.

Dated: November 19, 2002



                                       /s/ Scott D. Dorfman
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                       Scott D. Dorfman
                                       President, Chief Executive Officer and
                                       Chairman of the Board
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 12255]

# AGENCY:

Advisory Committee on International Law.

# ACTION:

Notice of open meeting.

# SUMMARY:

A meeting of the Department of State's Advisory Committee on International Law (“ACIL”) will take place on December 1, 2023, from 9 a.m. to 3:15 p.m. Acting Legal Adviser Richard C. Visek will chair the meeting, which will be open to the public up to the capacity of the meeting room. The meeting will include discussions on international law topics. These topics include: Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression against Ukraine; the International Law Commission's proposals on “General Principles of Law;” and new horizons for legal diplomacy in investment and trade, human rights, and climate change.

# ADDRESSES:

George Washington University Law School, Faculty Conference Center, 716 20th St. NW, 5th Floor, Washington, DC.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Tara M. Rangchi, Office of the Legal Adviser, at                         *rangchitm@state.gov*                         or 202-240-1662.                    

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Members of the public who wish to attend should contact Tara Rangchi by November 24, 2023, and provide their name, professional affiliation (if any), email address, and phone number. Priority for in-person seating will be given to members of the Advisory Committee, and remaining seating will be reserved based upon when persons contact the Office of the Legal Adviser. Individuals who wish to attend virtually may request a link to the virtual meeting platform. Attendees who require reasonable accommodation should make their requests by November 24, 2023. Requests received after that date will be considered but might not be possible to accommodate.

(Authority: 5 U.S.C. 1009 and 41 CFR 102-3.150.)

Tara M. Rangchi,

Executive Director, Advisory Committee on International Law, Department of State.

[FR Doc. 2023-24558 Filed 11-6-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-08-P
No. 49067.

#### Protests 655547-G, etc., of Dirk Uges (New York).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that the cheese in question is similar to that the subject of *Scaramelli*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706) and Abstracts 42146 and 48269. The protests were therefore sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.R. 1087 Introduced in House (IH)]

106th CONGRESS
  1st Session
                                H. R. 1087

  To require the relocation of a National Weather Service radar tower 
          which is on Sulphur Mountain near Ojai, California.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 11, 1999

 Mr. Gallegly introduced the following bill; which was referred to the 
                          Committee on Science

_______________________________________________________________________

                                 A BILL

 
  To require the relocation of a National Weather Service radar tower 
          which is on Sulphur Mountain near Ojai, California.

    Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the 
United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. RELOCATION OF RADAR TOWER.

    (a) Requirement To Relocate Radar Tower.--Not later than 18 months 
after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall 
relocate the National Weather Service radar tower which is located on 
Sulphur Mountain near Ojai, California, to a site which complies with 
the criteria listed in subsection (b).
    (b) Criteria For New Site.--The new site for the radar tower 
referred to in subsection (a) shall be selected so that the 
relocation--
            (1) will not result in degradation of service; and
            (2) will minimize the negative impacts of the radar tower 
        and its emissions on residential areas.
    (c) Report.--Not later than 6 months after the date of the 
enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall transmit a report to 
Congress that includes--
            (1) an identification of the new site selected for the 
        radar tower; and
            (2) evidence which was considered in reaching the 
        conclusion that relocation of the radar tower to the site 
        selected meets the criteria listed in subsection (b).

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

    For the purposes of this Act--
            (1) the term ``degradation of service'' means any decrease 
        in or failure to maintain the quality and type of weather 
        services provided by the National Weather Service to the 
        public; and
            (2) the term ``Secretary'' means the Secretary of Commerce.
                                 <all>
```
No. 62953.

#### The Danwill Company et al. *v.*United States,

protests 58/8309, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

The protests were dismissed.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                   Exhibit 23.1

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in this Registration Statement of
Bionutrics, Inc. on Form S-8 of our report dated January 13, 1998 (which report
contains an emphasis paragraph with respect to the Company's ability to
continue as a going concern), appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of
Bionutrics, Inc. for the year ended October 31, 1997.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Phoenix, Arizona

June 5, 1998
Before the Second Division,

July 12, 1950

No. 54545.

#### Joseph Woodwell Company *v.*United States,

petition 6763-R (Pittsburgh).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

At the trial petitioner’s witness testified that he was familiar with the importation of the merchandise herein; that the merchandise was entered at the price which petitioner paid for it; and that he believed the value at which entry was made was the correct dutiable value for the merchandise. On the record presented it was held that there was no intention to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the case or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore granted.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 216 (Thursday, November 9, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 77372]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-24825]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD


Senior Executive Service (SES) Performance Review Board

AGENCY: National Transportation Safety Board.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given of the appointment of members of the 
National Transportation Safety Board, Performance Review Board (PRB).

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Anh Bolles, Executive Resources 
Manager, Human Capital Management and Training, National Transportation 
Safety Board, 490 L'Enfant Plaza SW, Washington, DC 20594-0001, (202) 
314-6355.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 4314(c)(1) through (5) of title 5, 
United States Code requires each agency to establish, in accordance 
with regulations prescribed by the Office of Personnel Management, one 
or more SES Performance Review Boards (PRB). The board reviews and 
evaluates the initial appraisal of a senior executive's performance by 
the supervisor and considers recommendations to the appointing 
authority regarding the performance of the senior executive.
    The following have been designated as members of the 2022 
Performance Review Board of the National Transportation Safety Board 
(NTSB):
    Ms. Veronica Marshall, Chief Human Capital Officer, Office of Human 
Capital Management and Training, National Transportation Safety Board, 
PRB Chair.
    Mr. Morgan Turrell, Director, Office of Marine Safety, National 
Transportation Safety Board.
    Mr. Akbar Sultan, Director, Airspace Operations and Safety Program, 
National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
    Ms. Kathryn Catania, Deputy Director, Office of Safety 
Recommendations and Communications, National Transportation Safety 
Board (alternate member to review the evaluations of SES members 
serving on this PRB).

Candi R. Bing,
Federal Register Liaison.
[FR Doc. 2023-24825 Filed 11-8-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE P
No. 59949.

#### Railway Express Agency, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 170283-K, etc. (Pembina).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of beef similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Swift & Company et al.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 212, C. D. 1655), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 7518** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

- Appellee ,
v. GARY WESLEY RITCHEY , Defendant

- Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia , at Newport News . Robert G. Doumar , Senior District Judge. ( 4:07

- cr - 00009

- RGD

- JEB

- 1; 4:08

- cv - 00090

- RGD; 4:10

- cv - 00019

- RGD )

Submitted : April 26, 2011 Decided: May 4, 2011

Before GREGORY and DUNCAN , Circuit Judges, and HAMILTO N, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. Gary Wesley Ritchey, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Rae McKeel, Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Gary Wesley Ritchey seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. A. § 2255 ( West Supp. 2010 ) motion . The denial of his § 2255 motion is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a

cer tificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (200 6 ). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (200 6 ). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitution al right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Ritchey has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument becau se the facts and legal3 contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
# C_2015279EN.01004501.xml

| 24.8.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 279/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

24.8.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 279/45

---

Action brought on 23 June 2015 — Universal Protein Supplements v OHIM (Representation of a body builder)

(Case T-335/15)

(2015/C 279/56)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Universal Protein Supplements Corp. (New Brunswick, United States) (represented by: S. Malynicz, Barrister)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Trade mark at issue: Figurative mark representing a body builder — Application for registration No 13 060 991

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 6 March 2015 in Case R 2958/2014-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs of the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs of the applicant.

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
Exhibit 32.1

















CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Amended Annual Report of Shoshone Silver/Gold Mining Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A-1 for the year ended September 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “report”), I, Howard Crosby, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated this 30th day of August, 2013.








HOWARD CROSBYHoward CrosbyChief Executive Officer
No. 58887.

protests 163917-K, etc. (New York).

#### Antoine Chiris Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of essential oils the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Ungerer Co., Inc. v. United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 152, C. D. 1647), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained,