alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of State

          - [Public Notice: 12227]

Pursuant to the authority vested in me by section 620(q) of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (FAA), Executive Order 12163, and Department of State Delegation of Authority 513, I hereby determine that targeted assistance to Zimbabwe in the areas of health, good governance and respect for human rights, education, leadership, agriculture/food security, poverty reduction, livelihoods, family planning and reproductive health, macroeconomic growth (including anti-corruption efforts), helping victims of trafficking and combatting trafficking, and advancing biodiversity and wildlife conservation, as well as the continuation of assistance that would have a significant adverse effect on vulnerable populations if suspended, is in the national interest of the United States and thereby waive the application of section 620(q) of the FAA with respect to such assistance.

                    This determination shall be published in the                     **Federal Register**                     and, with the accompanying Memorandum of Justification, shall be transmitted to Congress.                

Dated: September 28, 2023.

Richard Verma,

Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources.

[FR Doc. 2023-23718 Filed 10-26-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4710-26-P
No. 54539.

#### Park & Tilford Import Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 152150-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 “the court dismissed the protest.
# C_2015254EN.01001601.xml

| 3.8.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 254/16 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.8.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 254/16

---

Action brought on 22 May 2015 — Iberdrola v Commission

(Case T-260/15)

(2015/C 254/19)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Iberdrola, SA (Biblao, Spain) (represented by: J. Ruiz Calzado and J. Domínguez Pérez, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Forms of order sought

Forms of order sought

| — | annul Article 1; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Article 1;

| — | annul Article 4(1) of the contested decision insofar as it requires the Kingdom of Spain to put an end to the aid scheme referred to in Article 1; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Article 4(1) of the contested decision insofar as it requires the Kingdom of Spain to put an end to the aid scheme referred to in Article 1;

| — | annul Article 4(2), (3), (4) and (5) of the contested decision, insofar as it orders the recovery of the State aid established by the Commission; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Article 4(2), (3), (4) and (5) of the contested decision, insofar as it orders the recovery of the State aid established by the Commission;

| — | in the alternative, limit the scope of the recovery obligation imposed on the Kingdom of Spain by Article 4(2) of the contested decision under the same terms as those established in the First and Second Decisions, and |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, limit the scope of the recovery obligation imposed on the Kingdom of Spain by Article 4(2) of the contested decision under the same terms as those established in the First and Second Decisions, and

| — | order the Commission to bear the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to bear the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The contested decision in these proceedings is the same as that in Cases T-12/15, Banco de Santander and Santusa v Commission and T-252/15 Ferrovial SA and Others v Commission.

Banco de Santander and Santusa

Commission

Ferrovial SA and Others

Commission

The pleas and main arguments relied on are similar to those already raised in those cases.

---
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                                   PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


I, Philip M. Pead, the Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Per-Se
Technologies, Inc. (the "Company"), in compliance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby
certify that Amendment No. 1 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A
for the period ended June 30, 2004, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission: (i) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (ii) the information contained in
such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.


                                    By: /s/ PHILIP M. PEAD
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Philip M. Pead
                                        Chairman, President and
                                        Chief Executive Officer

Date: March 4, 2005


                                       3
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Commission of Fine Arts

Per 45 CFR 2102.3, the next meeting of the U.S. Commission of Fine Arts is scheduled for November 16, 2023, at 9 a.m. and will be held via online videoconference. Items of discussion may include buildings, infrastructure, parks, memorials, and public art.

                    Draft agendas, the link to register for the online public meeting, and additional information regarding the Commission are available on our website:                     *www.cfa.gov.*                     Inquiries regarding the agenda, as well as any public testimony, should be addressed to Thomas Luebke, Secretary, U.S. Commission of Fine Arts, at the above address; by emailing                     *cfastaff@cfa.gov;*                     or by calling 202-504-2200. Individuals requiring sign language interpretation for the hearing impaired should contact the Secretary at least 10 days before the meeting date.                

Dated November 3, 2023 in Washington, DC.

Susan M. Raposa,

Technical Information Specialist.

[FR Doc. 2023-24671 Filed 11-7-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6330-01-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                LIST OF SIGNIFICANT SUBSIDIARIES OF THE COMPANY

 1. Agri-Empresa, Inc. (TX)
 2. Boyd's Bit Service, Inc. (LA)
 3. Charles Holston, Inc. (LA)
 4. Coil Tubing Services, L.L.C. (LA)
 5. Diamond Wireline Services, Inc. (TX)
 6. Drill Motor Services, Inc. (LA)
 7. Dyna Drill Technologies, Inc. (TX)
 8. Grinding and Sizing Company, Inc. (TX)
 9. Integrity Industries, Inc. (TX)
10. PathFinder Energy Services, Inc. (LA)
11. PathFinder Energy Services Limited (UK)
12. PathFinder Energy Services AS (Norway)
13. Perf-O-Log, Inc. (TX)
14. Thomas Energy Services, Inc. (LA)
15. U.S. Clay, L.P. (AL)
16. Well Safe, Inc. (TX)
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

 

IN RE: IMMODIUM ADVANCED

ANTITRUST LITIGATION

CIVIL ACTION Nos. 

02-4105

02-4149

02-4180

02-4197

02-4362

02-4386

02-4387

02-4476

02-4530

02-6797

02-6993

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 26th day of June, 2003, upon consideration of the attached request

dated June 25, 2003, it is hereby ORDERED that the eleven cases listed above shall be 

consolidated with Civil Action Number 02-4093 and every pleading filed in the consolidated

Immodium Advanced Class Action shall bear the following caption: “In Re: Immodium Advanced

Antitrust Litigation.

BY THE COURT:

 

MARVIN KATZ, S.J.

Case 2:02-cv-04093-MK Document 11 Filed 06/26/2003 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 2  COMMENTS BY AUDITORS
FOR UNITED STATES READERS
ON DIFFERENCES BETWEEN CANADIAN AND UNITED STATES REPORTING STANDARDS  In the United States of
America, reporting standards for auditors also require the addition of an
explanatory paragraph (following the opinion paragraph) outlining changes in
accounting principles that have been implemented in the financial statements
and/or when there are changes in accounting principles that have a material
effect on comparability of Enerplus Resources Funds financial statements. As
discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Fund changed
its method of accounting for stock-based compensation to conform to the new
Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants Handbook recommendations Section 3870.  Our report to the unitholders of the Fund
dated March 5, 2004 is expressed in accordance with Canadian reporting
standards, which do not require a reference to such changes in accounting
principles in the auditors report when the changes are properly accounted for
and adequately disclosed in the financial statements.   /s/ Deloitte
  & Touche LLPChartered
  AccountantsCalgary,
  Alberta, Canada  March 5, 2004
# C_2015138EN.01005901.xml

| 27.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 138/59 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 138/59

---

Action brought on 20 February 2015 — Aston Martin Lagonda v OHIM (Representation of a grille positioned on the front of a motor vehicle)

(Case T-87/15)

(2015/C 138/76)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Aston Martin Lagonda Ltd (Gaydon, United Kingdom) (represented by: D. Farnsworth, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Trade mark at issue: Community mark indicated as ‘other’ representing a grille positioned on the front of a motor vehicle — Application for registration of a Community trade mark No 11 867 215

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 11 December 2014 in Case R 1797/2014-2

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision insofar as it upheld the conclusion of the examiner that the mark applied for prima facie lacked distinctive character for the goods and services in question; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision insofar as it upheld the conclusion of the examiner that the mark applied for prima facie lacked distinctive character for the goods and services in question;

prima facie

| — | allow the community trade mark application No 11 867 215 to proceed to publication; |
| --- | --- |

—

allow the community trade mark application No 11 867 215 to proceed to publication;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) Regulation No 207/2009.

---
No. 61723.

#### Manca, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 306068-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Olivee, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of parts of photo enlargers; that said enlargers were held dutiable at 15 percent under paragraph 1551, as modified, as photographic cameras in *Manca, Inc.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 271, C. D. 1874); and that, in accordance with said decision, parts for enlargers are properly dutiable as parts of photographic cameras under paragraph 1551, the claim of the plaintiff at 20 percent was sustained.
No. 59440.

protest 253328-K (New York).

#### Wynpo Trading Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Since the protest was filed more than 60 days after liquidation, it was dismissed as untimely, by virtue of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.
August 27, 1946

No. 51283.

Suit 4529.

#### C. *H. Powell Co. et al.*v. *United States.*

C. D. 946 affirmed June 27 ,1946. C. A. D. 340.
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

1ST SESSION H. RES. 535 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the Republic 

of India should be a permanent member of the United Nations Security 

Council. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

SEPTEMBER 25, 2017 

Mr. PALLONE (for himself, Mr. BERA, Mr. JOHNSON of Georgia, Mr. 

KRISHNAMOORTHI, Ms. EDDIE BERNICE JOHNSON of Texas, Ms. 

GABBARD, and Mr. GENE GREEN of Texas) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that 

the Republic of India should be a permanent member 

of the United Nations Security Council. 

Whereas there are currently five permanent members of the 

United Nations Security Council; 

Whereas the Republic of India is the second most populous 

country in the world with more than 1.2 billion citizens; 

Whereas India is the world’s largest democracy; 

Whereas India has the third largest standing army in the 

world, the largest volunteer army in the world, and has 

demonstrated a strong commitment to promoting regional 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 535 IH 

and global peace by providing tens of thousands of troops 

to United Nations-mandated peacekeeping missions; 

Whereas India has been elected seven times as a non-permanent member of the United Nations Security Council, 

and, in 2010, a majority of the United Nations General 

Assembly elected India to be the Asian representative to 

the United Nations Security Council; and 

Whereas the United States-India relationship is an essential 

partnership supporting global economic and strategic 

policies: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) supports the Republic of India’s inclusion as 

3 a permanent member of the United Nations Security 

4 Council; and 

5 (2) urges the Administration to work with 

6 members of the United Nations to effect India’s 

7 entry as a permanent member of the United Nations 

8 Security Council. 

Æ 


dlhill on DSK3GLQ082PROD with BILLS
No. 59436.

protest 257898-K (New York).

#### S. Stern, Henry & Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that, as set forth in the collector’s letter of transmittal, the entry should have been liquidated on the basis of a total value, computed by multiplying the total invoiced weight of 11.40 kilos by the unit appraised value of $60 per kilo. The claim of the plaintiff was sustained accordingly.
No. 57162.

protests 918685-G, etc. (New York).

#### Rosenblatt *&*Towbin et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the kidskin plates are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Kung Chen Fur Corpn.*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Ford, J., concurred.

Mollison, J., dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1480, *supra.*
September 3, 1947

No. 51891.

Suit *4565.*

#### Perry *Ryer & Co.*v. *United States.*

C. D. 1028 reversed May 20, 1947. C. A. D. 367.
January 21, 2010

Ms. Deborah Rabin, Regulations Coordinator

Air and Radiation Management Administration

Maryland Department of the Environment

1800 Washington Blvd, Suite 1880

Baltimore, MD 21230

‐ 1720

Re: Comments on proposed revisions to COMAR 26.11.19.10

‐ 1

Dear Ms. Rabin:

The Flexographic Technical Association (FTA) thanks you for the opportunity to review and comment on

the proposed amendments to COMAR 26.11.19.10

‐ 1 Volatile Organic Compounds Released by Specific

Industries (Flexible Packaging Industry) released by the Maryland Department of Environment (MDE).

We appreciate your willingness to work with the printing industry in developing these amendments

regarding the application of reasonably available control technology (RACT) in the flexible package

printing industry.

The FTA represents the flexographic printing industry which includes flexible package printers (primarily

SIC 2759 and various NAICS 323112 codes) in Maryland. Although not as large as printing associations

representing other print processes, FTA has a number of flexographic printers in Maryland.

Overall, FTA supports the MDE in its use of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (USEPA) 2006

Control Techniques Guidelines for Flexible Package Printing EPA 453/R

‐ 06

‐ 003 as the basis for

developing RACT requirements for the flexible package printing industry in your state. The proposed

changes to COMAR 26.11.19.10

‐ 1 correspond to the federal standard, but the action is not more

restrictive or stringent.

If you have any questions feel free to contact me at your convenience.

Sincerely,

Doreen M. Monteleone, Ph.D.

Director EHS, Membership & Special Projects
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Office of Management and Budget

# AGENCY:

Office of Management and Budget.

# ACTION:

Notice of availability.

# SUMMARY:

The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) is announcing the issuance of the revised Circular A-94, “Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit-Cost Analysis of Federal Programs.”

# ADDRESSES:

                        Circular A-94, “Regulatory Analysis,” is available at                         *https://www.whitehouse.gov/​wp-content/​uploads/​2023/​11/​CircularA-94.pdf.*

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Jamie Taber, Office of Economic Policy, Office of Management and Budget, (202) 395-2515,                         *a94@omb.eop.gov.*

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    OMB announces the issuance of the revised Circular A-94, Regulatory Analysis. OMB Circular No. A-94 provides guidance on benefit-cost analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis of Federal spending. The new Circular is available at                     *https://www.whitehouse.gov/​wp-content/​uploads/​2023/​11/​CircularA-94.pdf.*

This Circular replaces and rescinds Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular No. A-94, “Guidelines and Discount Rates for Benefit Cost Analysis of Federal Programs,” dated October 29, 1992.

A draft of this Circular was subject to public comment and interagency review.

Wesley Yin,

Associate Director for Economic Policy, Office of Management and Budget.

[FR Doc. 2023-24817 Filed 11-9-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3110-01-P
No. 57605.

#### Marine Products Company *v.*United States,

petition 6984-R (San Diego).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the facts herein as to the circumstances of the entry of the involved merchandise are the same in all material respects as those in Abstract 57106, it was held that there was no intent to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the case or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the. merchandise. The petition was therefore granted.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


        <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                              JUL-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                            1206
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    41319
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (9314)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 43761
<PP&E>                                            8644
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (5870)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  126089
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          (41434)
<BONDS>                                       (182032)
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      188045
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  (126089)
<SALES>                                          38231
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 38231
<CGS>                                             7232
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    31458
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                  (99)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                  2932
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                6771
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                     99
<INCOME-TAX>                                       225
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              (126)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     (126)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>