alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Blue Ridge Energy, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Patrick
A. Kelleher, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ Patrick A. Kelleher
-------------------------------
Patrick A. Kelleher
President and Chief Executive Officer
August 13, 2004
**Exhibit
      32.1**





CERTIFICATIONS
      PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Energy Infrastructure Acquisition Corp.
      (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with
      the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the
      undersigned hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted
      pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best
      of
      the undersigned’s knowledge:




(1)  The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)  The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and result of operations of the Company for the period
      certified.





Signed
      on
      this 16th day of April ,
      2007


/s/
              Ramesh AkellaRamesh
                Akella
              President,
                Chief Strategy Officer and Director
              (Principal
                Executive Officer and Principal Financial
                Officer)
Before the First Division,

January 30, 1946

No. 50854.

#### Petition 6510-R of Kassab Bros. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

Upon the record the court was convinced that petitioners acted in good faith and that the undervaluation on entry was solely the result of a clerical error. It was held that there was no intention to conceal or to misrepresent any of the facts or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise or to defraud the revenue of the United States. The petition was therefore granted.
1

 The Constar defendants are Constar International, Inc., Crown Cork & Seal

Company, Inc., Charles F. Casey, William G. Little, Michael J. Hoffman, James C. Cook,

Alan W. Rutherford, John W. Conway, Angus F. Smith and Frank J. Mechura. The

Underwriter defendants are Salomon Smith Barney, Inc., Citigroup, Deutsche Bank

Securities, Inc., JP Morgan Securities, Inc., and Lazard Freres & Co., LLC. 

2

 In considering a motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6), the district court must

“accept as true the factual allegations in the complaint and all reasonable inferences that

can be drawn therefrom. [A dismissal will be affirmed] only if no relief can be granted

under any set of facts the plaintiff could prove.” Policastro v. Kontogiannis, 2005 WL

1005131, at *1 (3d Cir., Jan. 12, 2005) (citations omitted).

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

In re CONSTAR INT’L INC. SECURITIES : Master File No. 03-5020

LITIGATION :

: Class Action

This Document Relates To: :

ALL ACTIONS :

ORDER - MEMORANDUM

AND NOW, this 7th day of June, 2005, upon argument, the threshold motions of the

Constar defendants and the Underwriter defendants1 are denied. Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6).2

Viewing the law and the facts most favorably to the plaintiffs, it cannot be said with

certainty that no relief could be granted under any set of facts or circumstances consistent

with plaintiffs’ allegations.

BY THE COURT:

 s/ Edmund V. Ludwig 

Edmund V. Ludwig, J.

Case 2:03-cv-05020-EL Document 83 Filed 06/07/05 Page 1 of 1
No. 56941.

#### Hugh C. Edmiston & Co. *v.*United States,

protests 160815-K and 139294-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of china figures similar in all material re*405spects to the figures passed upon in *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.*v. *United States*(39 C. C. P. A. 15, C. A. D. 458), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
(Reap. Dec. 10930)

#### Elof Hansson, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 783254-1/4.

(Decided March 23, 1965)

*Sharp <£ Bo gam,*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Rao, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the undersigned, subject to the approval of the Court:

> *5831. That the subject merchandise consists of hardboard exported from Sweden as to which the Secretary of the Treasury issued a finding of dumping, published in 89 TD 197, TD 53567, made pursuant to the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C., 160, etseq.).

> 2. That pursuant to Section 168 of said Antidumping Act, the appraiser reported the purchase price (Sec. 162) and the foreign market value (Sec. 164) as to the merchandise listed o,n Schedule A attached hereto and made a part hereof.

> 3. That pursuant to Sections 500 and 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, the appraiser appraised all of the merchandise in the appeals for appraisement enumerated on Schedule A for regular duty purposes.

> 4. That the plaintiff duly filed appeals for reappraisement as to the values referred to in the above paragraphs Nos. 2 and 3.

> 5. That at the times relevant herein the purchase price and the foreign market value u,nder the said Antidumping Act are as specified in the aforesaid Schedule A attached hereto.

> 6. That as to all other items of merchandise not identified on Schedule A, the appraiser’s reports of purchase price and of foreign market value are correct.

> 7. That the appraiser’s findings of value under the provisions of Section 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, are correct.

> 8. That said appeals are submitted for decision upon this stipulation and said Schedule A.

Upon the agreed facts, I find foreign market value, as defined in section 164 of the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C. § 164), for the merchandise described in schedule A, annexed to this decision and made a part hereof, and the purchase price thereof, within section 162 of said act (19 U.S.C. § 162), to be as indicated in said schedule. As to all other items of merchandise not identified in schedule A, I find the foreign market values and purchase prices to be as reported by the appraiser. In all other respects, the values of all merchandise are as returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
No. 59956.

#### Jesus M. Altiere *v.*United States,

protests 255978-K, etc. (San Juan, P. R.).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

At the trial, the importer testified that the articles are never bought or sold as jewelry and that thley are always bought as souvenirs by tourists visiting Puerto Rico. An examination of collective exhibit 1 showed that the articles in question are miniature wooden curios in the form of shoes, drums, puppets, castanets, and maracas, appropriately colored. All of the articles are rather crudely constructed, and each of them has a small safety pin arranged in such a manner as to permit the article to be worn on a dress or on the lapel of a coat. Attached to the safety pin is a very small wooden plate bearing the words, “Puerto Rico,” giving to each of the articles positive identification as a souvenir or novelty of said Island. On the record presented, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                               0
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       9,811,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 21,155,000
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                    166,050,000
<ALLOWANCE>                                  1,339,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             280,101,000
<DEPOSITS>                                 176,907,000
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          1,896,000
<LONG-TERM>                                 74,680,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        39,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  26,555,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             280,101,000
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             14,280,000
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            1,088,000
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            15,368,000
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           5,826,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           8,289,000
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                        7,079,000
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                  513,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              4,836,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,294,000
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   3,371,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,371,000
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.88
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.88
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.14
<LOANS-NON>                                  2,733,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                               855,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            1,339,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                      1,339,000
        

</TABLE>
**EXHIBIT 32.1**

**CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER**

**AND THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO**

**SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

**(SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE18,**

**UNITED STATES CODE)**

Pursuant toSection 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) ofSection 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) (the Act), Joel V.Staff, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Reliant Energy, Inc. (theCompany), and Mark M. Jacobs, Executive Vice President and Chief FinancialOfficer, each hereby certify, to the best of their knowledge:

(a)          the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for thefiscal year ended December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities andExchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable, of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(b)         the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all materialrespects, the financial condition and results of operations of theCompany.
| Date: February 27, 2007 | */s/ Joel V. Staff*                                         |
|-------------------------|-------------------------------------------------------------|
|                    | Joel V. Staff                                               |
|                    | *Chairman and Chief Executive Officer*                      |
|                    |                                                        |
|                    |                                                        |
|                    | */s/ Mark M. Jacobs*                                        |
|                    | Mark M. Jacobs                                              |
|                    | *Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----
~~ Ministry of Transport , - TE MANATU WAKA 

IRBUSA-A 

26 March 2010 

Mr Paul Gretch 

Director 

Office of International Aviation 

Department of Transportation 

400 Seventh Street SW 

Room 6402 

Washington D.C. 20590 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 

Dear Mr Gretch 

Air New Zealand has advised that it proposes to perform a seventh freedom 

passenger charter between Brisbane and Las Vegas. The charter, using 

B7 4 7 aircraft, is to carry an Australian travel agency's staff to a private 

function. The current flight schedule would have the aircraft operate from 

Brisbane to Las Vegas on 16 July 2010. On 18 July, the aircraft would 

position from Las Vegas to Los Angeles for a technical stop before continuing 

to Brisbane. 

This letter is to advise that New Zealand will approve similar requests 

submitted by United States carriers to operate seventh freedom passenger 

charters from New Zealand to third countries. 

Yours Sincerely 

John Macilree 

Principal Adviser, Air Services 

WVIJ\I\I. transpol"t.govt.nz 

HEAD OFFICE: PO Box 3175. Wellington. New Zealand. TEL: +64 4 4399000. FAX: +64 4 439 9001 

AUCKLAND OFFICE: The Government Economic and Urban Development Office. PO Box 106 238. Auckland City. New Zealand. TEL:.64 9 985 4827. FAX: +64 9 985 4849 

CHRISTCHURCH OFFICE: PO Box 3014. Christchurch. New Zealand. TEL: +64 33669304. FAX:.64 3 3669317
Before the First Division,

November 29, 1961

No. 66232.

#### Kaytee Import, Inc., and William G. Young & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 60/28505, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Olive®, O. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of beads the same in all material respects as those the sub*383ject of *United States*v. *S. H. Kress & Co.*(46 C.C.P.A. 135, C.A.D. 716), the claim of tie plaintiffs was sustained.
Exhibit No. 32.1
Form 10-KSB
Blue Industries, Inc.
File No. 000-32567



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                               18 U.S.C. ss. 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Blue Industries, Inc. (the "Company") on
Form 10-KSB for the year ended  December  31, 2004 as filed with the  Securities
and Exchange  Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Roger E. Pawson,
Chief  Executive and Financial  Officer of the Company,  certify  pursuant to 18
U.S.C.  Section 1350, as adopted  pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

     (1) the Report fully  complies  with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
     (2)  the  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
material  respects,  the  financial  condition  and results of operations of the
Company.


Dated: May 2, 2005                         By:  /s/ Roger E. Pawson
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                          Roger E. Pawson
                                          Chief Executive and
                                          Chief Financial Officer


--------------------------------------
This  certification  accompanies  the  Report  pursuant  to  Section  906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002 and  shall not be deemed  filed by the  Company  for
purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

A signed  original of this written  statement  required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the  electronic  version of this written  statement
required by Section 906,  has been  provided to the Company and will be retained
by the Company and furnished to the  Securities  and Exchange  Commission or its
staff upon request.
**Exhibit
31**
 
 **CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO RULE 13a-14(a) OR RULE 15d-14(a)**
 
 I, Mark
A. Josipovich, certify that:
 
 1. I have
reviewed this annual report on Form 10-KSB of The Bluebook International Holding
Company (Registrant);
 
 2. Based
on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in
light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 3. Based
on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information
included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial
condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and
for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 4. I am
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant
and have:
 
 a.
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under my supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b.
Evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report my conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c.
Disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal
quarter (the Registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report)
that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 5. I have
disclosed, based on my most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
reporting, to the Registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the
Registrant's board of directors (or persons performing equivalent functions):
 
 a. All
significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and
report financial information; and
 
 b. Any
fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over financial
reporting.


*****Date:
      April 15, 2005*
    *By:*
    /s/ Mark A. Josipovich*Mark
      A. Josipovich*
      **Chief
      Executive Officer and *Principal
      *Accounting
      Officer**********
No. 51296.

#### Protests 18756-K, etc., of Eastman Kodak Co. (Rochester).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that passed upon in *Eastman Kodak Co.*v. *United States*(12 Cust. Ct. 105, C. D. 836). In accordance therewith the claim for free entry was sustained.
<PAGE>


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





   In connection with the Quarterly Report of Northeast Pennsylvania Financial
Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2005 as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Report"), we, Thomas M.
Petro, President and Chief Executive Officer, and Jerry D. Holbrook, Chief
Financial Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss.1350, as adopted pursuant
to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
   the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
   respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





/s/  Thomas M. Petro                                    /s/  Jerry D. Holbrook
--------------------------------------                  ------------------------
Thomas M. Petro                                         Jerry D. Holbrook
President and Chief Executive Officer                   Chief Financial Officer
Date: May 12, 2005                                      Date: May 12, 2005
No. 59941.

#### Harper, Robinson & Co. *v.*United States,

protest 265335-K (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

An examination of the official record disclosing no reason for disturbing the presumptively correct classification made by the collector, the protest was overruled.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

VICTOR : CIVIL ACTION

:

 :

 v. :

:

 : 

ZEMSKI : NO. 02-4100

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 19

th day of July, 2002, in accordance with the court's

procedure for random reassignment of cases, it is hereby

ORDERED that the above-captioned case is reassigned from the calendar of

the Honorable William H. Yohn, Jr. to the calendar of the Honorable Michael M. Baylson.

 FOR THE COURT:

 JAMES T. GILES 

 Chief Judge

 ATTEST:

 ___________________

 MICHAEL E. KUNZ

 Clerk of Court

Case 2:02-cv-04100-MMB Document 4 Filed 07/19/2002 Page 1 of 1
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL, 

 Petitioner 

 v. 

JEFFREY DAVID GOLDMANN, 

 Respondent 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

: 

No. 2281 Disciplinary Docket No. 3 

No. 42 DB 2016 

Attorney Registration No. 83928

(Out of State) 

ORDER 

PER CURIAM 

 AND NOW, this 28th day of July, 2016, upon consideration of the 

Recommendation of the Disciplinary Board, Jeffrey David Goldmann is placed on 

temporary suspension until further order by this Court. See Pa.R.D.E. 208(f)(5). He 

shall comply with the provisions of Pa.R.D.E. 217. 

 This Order constitutes an imposition of public discipline within the meaning of 

Pa.R.D.E. 402, pertaining to confidentiality. 

 Justice Mundy did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.