alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      12.1


Certification
      of CEO required by Rule 13a-14(a)





**Certifications**


I,
      Steven
      R. Garman, certify that:




1. I
      have
      reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of QI Systems Inc. (the
“company”);




2. Based
      on
      my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material
      fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made,
      in
      light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading
      with respect to the period covered by this report;




3. Based
      on
      my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included
      in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,
      results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods
      presented in this report;




4. The
      company’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
      maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act
      Rules
      13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the company and have:




(a) Designed
      such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
      and
      procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
      information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries,
      is
      made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period
      in which this report is being prepared;




(b) *Left
      blank intentionally [SEC Rel. No. 33-8238 and 33-8618* ];
      and




(c) Disclosed
      in this report any change in the company’s internal control over financial
      reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that
      has
      materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the company’s
      internal control over financial reporting; and




5. The
      company’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most
      recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the company’s
      auditors and the audit committee of the company’s board of directors (or persons
      performing the equivalent functions):




(a) All
      significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
      of
      internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to
      adversely affect the company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report
      financial information; and




(b) Any
      fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
      who
      have a significant role in the company’s internal control over financial
      reporting.




Date:
      December 14, 2006





/s/Steven
                R. GarmanName:Steven
                R. GarmanTitle:
                President and Principal Executive
                Officer
Attachment A

 :

02-2635 SHIRK :

02-2735 WATSON :

02-2736 HOOD :

02-2737 HART :

02-2738 JOHNSON :

02-2681 SHIRK :

02-2845 KINIUK :

02-3166 HRYCYK :

02-3168 GREEN :

02-3169 SAKEWICZ :

02-3170 HENDRICKS :

02-3171 PALMER :

02-3172 BERRY :

02-3175 SOLOMON :

02-3176 ROMANOWSKI :

02-3177 O’DONNELL :

02-3448 HARTMANN :

02-3449 ROCKS :

02-3450 REED :

02-3451 GAMBLER :

02-3452 MACAULEY :

02-3630 ALIBERT :

02-3631 VISCO :

02-3632 DANCSECS :

02-3847 HAMMOND :

02-3848 POTTER :

02-4095 SMITH :

02-4096 SEARFOSS :

02-4097 GEARINGER :

02-4101 FRYE :

02-4338 ZIMMERMAN :

02-4339 MEYER :

Case 2:02-cv-02738 Document 4-2 Filed 10/09/2002 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:02-cv-02738 Document 4-2 Filed 10/09/2002 Page 2 of 2
<Page>

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

We consent to the use in this Post-Effective Amendment No. 10 to Registration
Statement No. 333-52707 of Hartford Life and Annuity Insurance Company
Separate Account Three on Form N-4, of our report dated March 26, 2003 of
Hartford Life and Annuity Insurance Company relating to the statutory
financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2002 and of
our report dated February 21, 2003 of Hartford Life and Annuity Insurance
Company Separate Account Three relating to the financial statements as of and
for the year ended December 31, 2002, appearing in the Statement of
Additional Information, which is a part of such Registration Statement, and
to the reference to us under the headings "Experts" in such Statement of
Additional Information.

Deloitte & Touche LLP
Hartford, Connecticut
October 6, 2003
No. 59448.

protest 256395-K (A) (New York).

#### S. E. Laszlo *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

From an examination of the papers in the case, the court found nothing tending in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the decision of the collector.' The protest was therefore overruled.
Exhibit 32.1


Certification of the Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of American Apparel, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Paula Schneider, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


|    |                                                                                                                  
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                    
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered by the Report.




Date:March 25, 2015By:/s/ PAULA SCHNEIDERPaula SchneiderChief Executive Officer
# 		Sorry, something went wrong

An unexpected error has occurred.Web Parts Maintenance Page: If you have permission, you can use this page to temporarily close Web Parts or remove personal settings. For more information, contact your site administrator.

Technical Details

Troubleshoot issues with Microsoft SharePoint Foundation.

Correlation ID: 39a523a1-9428-a055-81d4-660a7e7718c1

Date and Time: 4/29/2024 12:39:38 AM

----

Go back to site
[Cite as Hunt v. Sheldon, 127 Ohio St.3d 14, 2010-Ohio-4991.] 

HUNT, APPELLANT, v. SHELDON, WARDEN, APPELLEE. 

[Cite as Hunt v. Sheldon, 127 Ohio St.3d 14, 2010-Ohio-4991.] 

Court of appeals’ judgment dismissing petition for writ of habeas corpus 

affirmed.

(No. 2010-0971 — Submitted October 13, 2010 — Decided October 20, 2010.) 

APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Marion County, No. 9-10-28. 

__________________ 

Per Curiam.

{¶ 1} We affirm the judgment of the court of appeals dismissing the 

amended petition of appellant, Rickie Lee Hunt, for a writ of habeas corpus to 

compel his release from prison. “ ‘[H]abeas corpus is proper in the criminal 

context only if the petitioner is entitled to immediate release from prison or some 

other physical confinement.’ ” Keith v. Bobby, 117 Ohio St.3d 470, 2008-Ohio1443, 884 N.E.2d 1067, ¶ 12, quoting Scanlon v. Brunsman, 112 Ohio St.3d 151, 

2006-Ohio-6522, 858 N.E.2d 411, ¶ 4. Hunt’s prison sentence has not expired, 

and he has no inherent or constitutional right to be released before its expiration, 

State ex rel. White v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth., 98 Ohio St.3d 290, 2003-Ohio773, 783 N.E.2d 900, ¶ 3; Hattie v. Anderson (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 232, 233, 626 

N.E.2d 67 (“R.C. 2967.03 creates no expectancy of parole or a constitutional 

liberty interest sufficient to establish a right of procedural due process”); Layne v. 

Ohio Adult Parole Auth., 97 Ohio St.3d 456, 2002-Ohio-6719, 780 N.E.2d 548, ¶ 

28 (Ohio Adult Parole Authority “has wide-ranging discretion in parole matters”). 

We deny appellant’s motion for oral argument and appointment of counsel. 

Judgment affirmed. 

 BROWN, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’CONNOR,

O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur. 
SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

2 

__________________ 

 Rickie Lee Hunt, pro se. 

 Richard Cordray, Attorney General, and Stephanie Watson, Principal 

Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. 

______________________
DEUTSCH, LARRIMORE, FARNISH & ANDERSSON, L.L.P.

BY: THOMAS S. FARNISH

I.D. No: 34656 ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF

1800 JFK Boulevard 

Philadelphia, PA 19103

(215) 209-8500

TIMOTHY DORIS

 vs.

MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.

CIVIL ACTION

NO: 02-CV-2751

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

RULE 26(a) REQUIRED DISCLOSURES

Initial Disclosures (1)

(A) Names, Addresses and Telephone Numbers of each individuals likely to have

discoverable information.

1. Helen Thorpe

3547 Indian Queen Lane

Philadelphia, PA 19129

215 438-0372

2. Frank Serrano

Director of security

Marriott Beach Resorts

Frenchman’s Reef

340-776-8500

B. Documents, Data, Compilations and Tangible Things:

1. Plaintiff’s Medical Records, Reports and Bills concerning injuries suffered in this

accident.

2. Incident & Loss Report prepared by Frank Serrano, Director of Security Frenchman’s

Reef Marriott Beach Resort.

Case 2:02-cv-02751-MMB Document 15 Filed 10/09/2002 Page 1 of 3
-2-

(2) Disclosure of Expert Testimony: 

(A) Plaintiff anticipates that all treating physicians may be called as expert witnesses in

this matter (please see medical records, reports and bills attached hereto).

 DEUTSCH, LARRIMORE, FARNISH & ANDERSSON,

LLP

 By: 

 THOMAS S. FARNISH

 Attorney for Plaintiff

Date: October 3, 2002

 

Case 2:02-cv-02751-MMB Document 15 Filed 10/09/2002 Page 2 of 3
-3-

DEUTSCH, LARRIMORE, FARNISH & ANDERSSON, L.L.P.

BY: THOMAS S. FARNISH

I.D. No: 34656 ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF

1800 JFK Boulevard 

Philadelphia, PA 19103

(215) 209-8500

TIMOTHY DORIS

 vs.

MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC.

CIVIL ACTION

NO: 02-CV-2751

JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

 

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on October 3, 2002, I served a copy of the within Rule 26(a) Required

Disclosures via United States Mail, First Class, Postage Prepaid, on the party as set forth below:

GREGORY KELLY, ESQUIRE

Kelly, McLaughlin, Foster, Bracaglia, Daly...

620 W. Germantown Pike, Suite 350

Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462

 

 DEUTSCH, LARRIMORE, FARNISH & ANDERSSON, LLP

 By: 

 THOMAS S. FARNISH

 Attorney for Plaintiff

Date: October 3, 2002 

 

Case 2:02-cv-02751-MMB Document 15 Filed 10/09/2002 Page 3 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

STANFORD GLABERSON, et al. : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. :

:

COMCAST CORPORATION, et al. : NO. 03-6604

ORDER

AND NOW, this 22nd day of September, 2015, following a hearing conducted on 

September 9, 2015, and for the reasons specified in the Final Judgment entered this day, IT IS 

HEREBY ORDERED AS FOLLOWS:

1. Plaintiffs’ Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement (Docket No. 

621) is GRANTED.

2. Subject to the provisions of Paragraphs 24-26 of the Final Judgment, Plaintiffs’ 

Motion for an Award of Attorneys’ Fees, Reimbursement of Expenses, and Payment of Service 

Award to Class Representative (Docket No. 615) is GRANTED.

3. Subject to the provisions of Paragraphs 16-17 of the Final Judgment, the Motion 

for Attorney Fees filed by Adkins, Kelston & Zavez P.C. (Docket No. 618) is GRANTED.

BY THE COURT:

s/John R. Padova

JOHN R. PADOVA, J.

Case 2:03-cv-06604-JP Document 641 Filed 09/22/15 Page 1 of 1
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 778 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 778

Honoring Erin Hamlin of Remsen, New York, for proudly representing the 
        United States in four consecutive Winter Olympic Games.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 13, 2018

Ms. Tenney (for herself, Ms. Stefanik, Mr. King of New York, Mr. Faso, 
   and Mrs. Carolyn B. Maloney of New York) submitted the following 
   resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and 
                           Government Reform

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Honoring Erin Hamlin of Remsen, New York, for proudly representing the 
        United States in four consecutive Winter Olympic Games.

Whereas, on Tuesday, February 12, 2018, Erin Hamlin competed in her fourth and 
        final Winter Olympic Games in Pyeongchang, South Korea, where she was 
        also selected as the United States flag bearer in the Opening Ceremony 
        on February 9, 2018;
Whereas Erin Hamlin was the first female American luger to medal at any Winter 
        Olympics, winning bronze at the 2014 Winter Olympics in Sochi, Russia, 
        and was the first American of either gender to medal in singles 
        competition; and
Whereas Erin Hamlin was the first Olympic athlete to represent the village of 
        Remsen, New York: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) congratulates and honors Erin Hamlin and her hometown 
        of Remsen, New York, on her performance at the 2018 Winter 
        Olympic Games in Pyeongchang, South Korea;
            (2) recognizes and commends the hard work, dedication, 
        determination, and commitment to excellence of Erin Hamlin for 
        ably representing the United States at four consecutive Olympic 
        Winter Games; and
            (3) recognizes and commends the people of Remsen, New York, 
        and the surrounding area for their outstanding loyalty and 
        support of Erin Hamlin throughout her Olympic career.
                                 <all>
```
----

| (1) | the      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months ended      June 30, 2010  (the “Report”) fully complies with the      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of      1934; and |
|-----|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |
|-----|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|   | Dated:  August      16, 2010                |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                       |   |
|   | /s/      George M. Hare                                    |   |
|   | George      M. Hare                                        |   |
|   | Chief      Financial Officer (Principal AccountingOfficer) |
Before the First Division,

September 19, 1946

No. 51306.

#### Protest 86831-K of Wing On Co. (New York).

*184Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

Two samples of the figures received in evidence were sent to the customs laboratory for analysis. The chemist’s report showed that the merchandise represented by the samples is made entirely of synthetic phenolic resin and that the synthetic resin does not serve as the binding agent. On the record presented and following Abstract 49907, said merchandise was held dutiable at 20 percent under paragraph 1558, as claimed. As to the items of mah jong sets, no proof having been submitted to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the collector’s classification, the claim as to said merchandise was overruled.
No. 65400.

#### Columbus Dixon, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 60/22669 (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of electrical floor polishers similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Electrolux Corporation*(46 C.C.P.A. 143, C.A.D. 718), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Before the Third Division

July 18, 1949

No. 53421.

protest 146918-K (Galveston).

#### Dixie Berry *v.*United States,

Ekwall, J.

This case having been submitted for decision on June 2, 1949, at Dallas, Tex., the protest was overruled on June 23, 1949, and reported in Abstract 53338. It now appearing to the court that the case was submitted prematurely, said decision and judgment are hereby set aside, and the protest is restored to the next Dallas, Tex., docket for further proceedings.
Case 2:03-cv-04318-JP Document 115 Filed 02/24/05 Page 1 of 34
Case 2:03-cv-04318-JP Document 115 Filed 02/24/05 Page 2 of 34
Case 2:03-cv-04318-JP Document 115 Filed 02/24/05 Page 3 of 34
Case 2:03-cv-04318-JP Document 115 Filed 02/24/05 Page 4 of 34
Case 2:03-cv-04318-JP Document 115 Filed 02/24/05 Page 5 of 34
Case 2:03-cv-04318-JP Document 115 Filed 02/24/05 Page 6 of 34
Case 2:03-cv-04318-JP Document 115 Filed 02/24/05 Page 7 of 34
Case 2:03-cv-04318-JP Document 115 Filed 02/24/05 Page 8 of 34
Case 2:03-cv-04318-JP Document 115 Filed 02/24/05 Page 9 of 34
Case 2:03-cv-04318-JP Document 115 Filed 02/24/05 Page 10 of 34
Case 2:03-cv-04318-JP Document 115 Filed 02/24/05 Page 11 of 34
Case 2:03-cv-04318-JP Document 115 Filed 02/24/05 Page 12 of 34
Case 2:03-cv-04318-JP Document 115 Filed 02/24/05 Page 13 of 34
Case 2:03-cv-04318-JP Document 115 Filed 02/24/05 Page 14 of 34
Case 2:03-cv-04318-JP Document 115 Filed 02/24/05 Page 15 of 34
Case 2:03-cv-04318-JP Document 115 Filed 02/24/05 Page 16 of 34
Case 2:03-cv-04318-JP Document 115 Filed 02/24/05 Page 17 of 34
Case 2:03-cv-04318-JP Document 115 Filed 02/24/05 Page 18 of 34
Case 2:03-cv-04318-JP Document 115 Filed 02/24/05 Page 19 of 34
Case 2:03-cv-04318-JP Document 115 Filed 02/24/05 Page 20 of 34
Case 2:03-cv-04318-JP Document 115 Filed 02/24/05 Page 21 of 34
Case 2:03-cv-04318-JP Document 115 Filed 02/24/05 Page 22 of 34
Case 2:03-cv-04318-JP Document 115 Filed 02/24/05 Page 23 of 34
Case 2:03-cv-04318-JP Document 115 Filed 02/24/05 Page 24 of 34
Case 2:03-cv-04318-JP Document 115 Filed 02/24/05 Page 25 of 34
Case 2:03-cv-04318-JP Document 115 Filed 02/24/05 Page 26 of 34
Case 2:03-cv-04318-JP Document 115 Filed 02/24/05 Page 27 of 34
Case 2:03-cv-04318-JP Document 115 Filed 02/24/05 Page 28 of 34
Case 2:03-cv-04318-JP Document 115 Filed 02/24/05 Page 29 of 34
Case 2:03-cv-04318-JP Document 115 Filed 02/24/05 Page 30 of 34
Case 2:03-cv-04318-JP Document 115 Filed 02/24/05 Page 31 of 34
Case 2:03-cv-04318-JP Document 115 Filed 02/24/05 Page 32 of 34
Case 2:03-cv-04318-JP Document 115 Filed 02/24/05 Page 33 of 34
Case 2:03-cv-04318-JP Document 115 Filed 02/24/05 Page 34 of 34
No. 57895.

#### Calvaire et al. *v.*United States,

protests 195041-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that ee'rtlifh items of the merchandise consist of beaded bags the same in all material resiSFótk as those the classification of which was involved in Abstract 56124, the elaifip the plaintiffs was sustained. *o)bui*
Exhibit 9.1

**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT**

The Board of DirectorsGiven Imaging Ltd.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements (No. 333-107630 and No. 333-73732) on Form S-8 of Given Imaging Ltd. (the “Company”) of our report dated February 10, 2004, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of the Company and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2003, which report appears in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2003.

 

|                                                                            |   |   |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ Somekh Chaikin                                                              |   |   |        |
| Somekh ChaikinCertified Public Accountants (Isr.)A member of KPMG International |   |   |   |

 

March 14, 2004

----
Document

Exhibit 10.26

Amendment Number One to the
Amended and Restated
Sempra Energy 
2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan
(As Amended Effective November 18, 2020)




This Amendment Number 1 to the Sempra Energy 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as amended and restated effective December 15, 2015 (the “2013 LTIP”) is dated November 18, 2020 (“Amendment Number 1”).
Section 1.   Amendment to Section 2.11. Section 2.11 of Article 2. Definitions of the 2013 LTIP is amended and restated in its entirety effective November 18, 2020 to read as follows: 
“Committee” means the Compensation Committee (currently known as the Compensation and Talent Development Committee) of the Board or a subcommittee thereof, or any other committee designated by the Board to administer this Plan.  The members of the Committee shall be appointed from time to time by and shall serve at the discretion of the Board.  The Committee shall consist solely of two or more Directors, each of whom shall qualify as a “non-employee director” as defined in Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act.


Section 2.   Amendment to Section 13.4. Section 13.4 of Article 13. Performance Measures of the 2013 LTIP is amended and restated in its entirety effective November 18, 2020 to read as follows: 


Committee Discretion.  In the event that the Committee determines that it is advisable to grant Awards that shall not qualify as Performance-Based Compensation, the Committee may make such grants without satisfying the requirements of Code Section 162(m) and base vesting on Performance Measures other than those set forth in Section 13.1.  In addition, the Committee shall not be required to administer this Plan in a manner that qualifies any Award  as Performance-Based Compensation, including, without limitation, that the Committee, or a duly authorized sub-committee of the Committee, be comprised solely of “outside “directors” within the meaning of Code Section 162(m). 


Section 3.   Governing Law.  Amendment Number One shall be governed by the laws of the State of California, excluding any conflicts or choice of law rule or principle that might otherwise refer construction or interpretation of this Plan to the substantive law of another jurisdiction.
Section 4.   Full Force and Effect.  The 2013 LTIP, as amended effective November 18, 2020 by Amendment Number One herein, shall remain in full force and effect in accordance with the terms and conditions thereof.




1