alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE>
<CAPTION>

   Schedule of Year-To-Date Principal and Interest Distributions
                           to
                  Certificateholders
                                                                              Ending
Class                   Interest             Principal      Losses           Balance
<S>                     <C>                  <C>            <C>              <C>
A                      4,992,903.19       7,038,867.22         0.00        454,987,132.78
C                      2,098,103.38               0.00         0.00          2,470,367.29
DIVC                         611.79               0.00         0.00                  0.00
M1                       252,389.41               0.00         0.00         22,236,000.00
M2                        88,836.06               0.00         0.00          7,413,000.00
P                        135,567.20               0.00         0.00                100.00
R1                             0.00               0.00         0.00                  0.00
R2                             0.00               0.00         0.00                  0.00

</TABLE>
(b) (6) (b) (6)



(b) (6)
No. 51292.

#### Protests 94726-K, etc., of B. Bendin, Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Keepe, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise consist of cheese similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Scaramelli*v. *United States*(9 Cust. Ct. 270, C. D. 706) and Abstract 48539. In accordance therewith and following the decisions cited, wherein the court stated, upon authority of Abstracts 40880 and 41794, that the string surrounding the Provolone cheese was deductible as tare as a part of the inedible coverings, it was held that the cheese in question is dutiable upon the basis of the net weight of the cheese as returned by the United States weigher, not including the weight of the strings, less *2%*percent for inedible coverings. The protests were sustained to this extent.
One Phone Call 

May Prevent 

Foreclosure 
If you have been struggling to pay 

your mortgage, or anticipate that there may be trouble 

ahead, we can help. Call us to discuss foreclosure 

avoidance solutions that may help you keep your 

home, including a modification under the federal Home 

Affordable Modification program. If keeping your home 

is not the best option, we’ll explore other alternatives 

to foreclosure that can allow you to give up your home 

so you can achieve more financial stability. 

Place your logo and contact information here. 

Company Name 

1234 Street Name Here
 

City Name, State 12345
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE>                     5

<CIK>                         0000878377
<NAME>                        CPX Corp.
<MULTIPLIER>                                   1,000
<CURRENCY>                                     DOLLARS

<S>                                            <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                  9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                              MAR-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                                 APR-1-1999
<PERIOD-END>                                   DEC-31-1999
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                1
<CASH>                                         1,263
<SECURITIES>                                       0
<RECEIVABLES>                                      0
<ALLOWANCES>                                       0
<INVENTORY>                                        0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                   0
<PP&E>                                             0
<DEPRECIATION>                                     0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 1,263
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                              0
<BONDS>                                            0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                              0
<PREFERRED>                                        0
<COMMON>                                          15
<OTHER-SE>                                     1,263
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   1,263
<SALES>                                            0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                   0
<CGS>                                              0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    873
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  872
<INCOME-TAX>                                       0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              872
<DISCONTINUED>                                     0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                    0
<CHANGES>                                          0
<NET-INCOME>                                     872
<EPS-BASIC>                                    .06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    .06



</TABLE>
# 		Sorry, something went wrong

An unexpected error has occurred.Web Parts Maintenance Page: If you have permission, you can use this page to temporarily close Web Parts or remove personal settings. For more information, contact your site administrator.

Technical Details

Troubleshoot issues with Microsoft SharePoint Foundation.

Correlation ID: 3aa523a1-64be-a055-81d4-6e2595fdad7b

Date and Time: 4/29/2024 12:39:44 AM

----

Go back to site
October 6, 1954

No. 58421.

Suit 4793.

#### M. Pressner & Co. *v.*United States.

C. D. 1542 affirmed June 24, 1954. C. A. D. 568.
No. 56913.

#### Carson M. Simon & Co. *v.*United States,

protest 172051-K (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the correct dutiable weight of the steel beams in question is 219,200 pounds. Accepting this stipulation as an agreed statement of fact, it was held that the merchandise is dutiable at one-eighth of 1 cent per pound under paragraph 312, as modified, *supra,*on the basis of 219,200 pounds.
EXHIBIT 31.1
 SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
 I, Robert D Burr, CERTIFY THAT:
 1.
    
    I have reviewed this 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 of Bayou City Exploration, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this
report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the small business
issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the small
business issuers disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the
end of the period covered by this report based
on such evaluation;c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the
small business issuers internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the
small business issuers most recent fiscal
quarter (the small business issuers fourth
quarter in the case of an annual report) that
has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the small
business issuers internal control over
financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The small business issuers certifying officer(s) have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors
and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the small business issuers ability to
record, process, summarize and report
financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business
issuers internal controls over financial
reporting.
  /s/ Robert D. BurrRobert D. BurrChief Executive Officer and President
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ELIZABETH EVON NICHOLS,

 Plaintiff - Appellant,

 v.

CITY OF PORTLAND; et al.,

 Defendants - Appellees.

No. 13-35987

D.C. No. 3:12-cv-01889-MO

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Oregon

Michael W. Mosman, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted November 5, 2015** 

Portland, Oregon

Before: KOZINSKI, BERZON, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.

Elizabeth Evon Nichols appeals from a jury verdict entered against her

following a trial on her claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On appeal, she challenges

only the district court’s formulation of two jury instructions, one pertaining to

FILED

NOV 13 2015

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).
Page 2 of 3

whether the officers’ use of force against her was reasonable and another stating

the elements of a First Amendment retaliation claim under § 1983.

1. We need not decide whether Nichols preserved her objection to the

district court’s “least intrusive alternative” instruction. Regardless of our standard

of review, that instruction was neither misleading nor an incorrect statement of the

law. See Hunter v. Cty. of Sacramento, 652 F.3d 1225, 1232 (9th Cir. 2011). The

district court properly instructed the jury to consider whether the officers’ use of

force was objectively reasonable under the totality of the circumstances. See

Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386, 396–97 (1989). Nichols argues that the “least

intrusive alternative” instruction was erroneous because it did not expressly

instruct the jury to balance the force used against the apparent need for force. The

immediately preceding instruction made clear, however, that the jury was to

consider those factors in determining whether the officers’ use of force was

reasonable.

2. Nor did the district court err by instructing the jury that, in order to find

Sergeant McDaniel liable for First Amendment retaliation, it needed to find that his

desire to chill Nichols’s speech was a “substantial or motivating factor for [his]

action.” The court’s instruction correctly reflected our case law concerning the

causation element of a First Amendment retaliation claim brought by a private
Page 3 of 3

plaintiff under § 1983. See Lacey v. Maricopa Cty., 693 F.3d 896, 916–17 (9th

Cir. 2012) (en banc); Skoog v. Cty. of Clackamas, 469 F.3d 1221, 1231–32 (9th

Cir. 2006).

AFFIRMED.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                     18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                      AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
          SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Amended Annual Report of Birch Financial, Inc. (the
"Registrant") on Form 10-KSB/A-1 for the year ending December 31, 2004, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
"Report"), We, Nelson Colvin, President and Keith L. Walton, Treasurer of the
Registrant, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


Date: 8/17/05                             /s/Nelson L. Colvin
     --------                             --------------------
                                          Nelson L. Colvin
                                          President

Date: 8/17/05                             /s/Keith L. Walton
     --------                             --------------------
                                          Keith L. Walton
                                          Treasurer
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended (the Exchange Act), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Mike Burns, Chief Financial Officer of Volterra Semiconductor Corporation (the Company),
hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

1. The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009, to
which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the Quarterly Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and

2. The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

In Witness Whereof, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of the 4thday of May, 2009.



|    |  |                        
|--- |  | -----------------------
|    | 
|By: |  | /s/ Mike Burns         
|    |  | Mike Burns             
|    |  | Chief Financial Officer

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Volterra Semiconductor Corporation under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the
date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


        <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                                    3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                              JUL-1-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000
<CASH>                                            1815
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                    48627
<ALLOWANCES>                                    (8426)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                 56816
<PP&E>                                           11387
<DEPRECIATION>                                  (7043)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  153884
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          (167649)
<BONDS>                                       (186770)
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      195819
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                  (167649)
<SALES>                                          43117
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                 43117
<CGS>                                             8436
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    38019
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 (251)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 11434
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                8051
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                 (2702)
<INCOME-TAX>                                       129
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                             (2831)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                    (2831)
<EPS-BASIC>                                        0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2


                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                            18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Blue Ridge Energy, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Forrest
E. Ebbs, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

/s/ Forrest E. Ebbs
Forrest E. Ebbs
Sr. Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
May 14, 2003
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

   We consent to the incorporation by reference in Reliant Resources, Inc.'s
Registration Statement Nos. 333-60124, 333-60328, 333-74754, 333-74790,
333-86608, 333-86610, 333-86612, 333-98273, 333-101471, and 333-101473, on Form
S-8 of our report dated March 31, 2003, April 29, 2003 as to Schedule I listed
in the Index at Item 15(a)(2) (which report expresses an unqualified opinion
and includes explanatory paragraphs relating to (i) the restatement described
in Note 1 and the (ii) change in method of accounting for derivatives and
hedging activities in 2001, the change in method of accounting for goodwill and
other intangibles in 2002 and the method of presenting trading and marketing
activities from a gross basis to net basis in 2002, as described in Notes 7, 6
and 2, respectively) on the consolidated financial statements of Reliant
Resources, Inc. and our report dated March 31, 2003 (which expresses an
unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph relating to the
change in method of accounting for derivatives and hedging activities in 2001,
as described in Note 8) on the financial statements of El Dorado Energy, LLC
appearing in this amended Annual Report on Form 10-K/A of Reliant Resources,
Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2002.

/s/  DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Houston, Texas
April 29, 2003
IN THE

TENTH COURT OF APPEALS

No. 10-17-00213-CV

JAMES ARTHUR COOK, II, MIA NICHOLE 

COOK, KRISTAL ALBERTA COOK, GREGORY 

COOK, CHRISTOPHER CHARLES COOK AND 

JAMES ARTHUR COOK, JR.,

Appellants

v.

BETTY LEWIS AND THE ESTATE OF JAMES 

ARTHUR COOK, DECEASED,

Appellees

From the County Court at Law No. 1

McLennan County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2011-0494-PR1

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellants have filed a “Motion to Withdraw Notice of Appeal.” We construe 

Appellants’ motion as a motion to voluntarily dismiss their appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.1(a)(1). Dismissal of this appeal would not prevent a party from seeking relief to which 

it would otherwise be entitled. The motion is granted, and the appeal is dismissed.
Cook v. Lewis Page 2

REX D. DAVIS

Justice

Before Chief Justice Gray,

Justice Davis, and 

Justice Scoggins

Motion granted; appeal dismissed

Opinion delivered and filed August 2, 2017

[CV06]
No. 58870.

protests 153524—K, etc. (Detroit).

#### F. W. Myers & Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of beef similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Swift & Company et al.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 212, C. D. 1655), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>       6
<SERIES>
   <NUMBER> 1
   <NAME> BELAIR CAPITAL FUND LLC


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                             6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                         DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-END>                              JUN-30-2000
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>                     2,443,225,250
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>                    2,985,705,659
<RECEIVABLES>                             26,294,355
<ASSETS-OTHER>                            16,289,355
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                      0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                            3,028,289,369
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                  0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                   896,630,517
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>                 23,887,454
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                       917,517,971
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                           2,110,771,398
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>                  0
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>                     15,234,397
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                     15,900,744
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                 0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                    0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                   0
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                  0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>                  566,163,232
<NET-ASSETS>                              2,110,771,398
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                         38,979,034
<INTEREST-INCOME>                         2,282,021
<OTHER-INCOME>                            0
<EXPENSES-NET>                            35,093,826
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>                   6,167,229
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>                  45,351,704
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>                 59,628,151
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>                     111,147,084
<EQUALIZATION>                            0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                 0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                  0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                     5,104,441
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                   0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>               (666,347)
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                       0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>                    16,401,645
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                   0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                 0
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                   0
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                     3,527,449
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                        23,892,995
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                           35,093,826
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                      2,081,763,758
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                     131.72
<PER-SHARE-NII>                           0.40
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                   6.76
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                      0
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                 (0.33)
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                      0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                       138.55
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                           3.39


</TABLE>
Document

Exhibit 10.8(h)


—————————————————————
DESCRIPTION OF 2021 SALARY RATES
FOR 2020 NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
—————————————————————




Annualized salary rates for the executive officers of the First Horizon Corporation (the “Company”) who are expected to be named in the executive compensation disclosures of the Company’s 2021 proxy statement in relation to fiscal year 2020 (“2020 Named Executive Officers”) currently are:


          
    Officer Name    2021 Salary Rate
    D. Bryan Jordan    $  1,030,000
    William C. (B.J.) Losch III    675,000
    Daryl G. Byrd    1,150,000
    Michael J. Brown    700,000
    Anthony J. Restel    675,000


The annualized rates shown above are those in effect on the date this exhibit is filed with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K. Salary rates generally continue in effect until they are changed.  






1