alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# E C 

# / R Incorporated Pro viding Environmental Technical Support Since 1989

501 Eastowne Drive, Suite 25 0  Chapel Hill, North Carolina 2751 4

Telephone: (919)484

- 0222  Fax: (919) 484

- 0122 MEMORANDUM

Date: August 10 , 2010

To: Bruce Moore, EPA/OAQPS/SPPD/CCG

From: Denise Grubert , EC/R Incorporated

Karen Marsh, EC/R Incorporated

Heather Brown, EC/R Incorporated

Subject: Site V isit R eport for British Petroleum Jonah Field S ite

I. INTR ODUCTION

The purpose of this memorandum is to summarize the Environmental Protection Agency

(EPA) site visit to British Petroleum’s Jonah Field site in Wyoming.

II. LOCATION AND DATE

Pinedale, Wyoming on August 6, 2010

III. ATTENDEES

BP

Don Brooks

Je remy Lyons

Derek Smith

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)

Rachel Agnew

Jodi Howard

Bruce Moore

Greg Nizich

Nick Parsons

EC/R Incorporated

Heather Brown

Denise Grubert

Karen MarshWyoming Department of Environment

Jennifer Frazier, Air Quality D ivision

Cynthia Madison , Air Quality Division

The site visit report for this facility contains confidential business information (CBI), and

pending approval by the facility, a non

- confidential report has not been issued.
H. Res. 900 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

May 17, 2018. 

Resolved, That at any time after adoption of this resolution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule XVIII, 

declare the House resolved into the Committee of the Whole 

House on the state of the Union for further consideration of 

the bill (H.R. 2) to provide for the reform and continuation 

of agricultural and other programs of the Department of Agriculture through fiscal year 2023, and for other purposes. 

No further amendment to the committee amendment in the 

nature of a substitute shall be in order except those printed 

in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this 

resolution. Each such further amendment may be offered only 

in the order printed in the report, may be offered only by a 

Member designated in the report, shall be considered as read, 

shall be debatable for the time specified in the report equally 

divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, 

shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not be subject 

to a demand for division of the question in the House or in 

the Committee of the Whole. All points of order against such 
2 

•HRES 900 EH 

further amendments are waived. At the conclusion of consideration of the bill for amendment pursuant to this resolution 

the Committee shall rise and report the bill to the House with 

such amendments as may have been adopted. Any Member 

may demand a separate vote in the House on any amendment 

adopted in the Committee of the Whole to the bill or to the 

committee amendment in the nature of a substitute. The previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill and 

amendments thereto to final passage without intervening motion except one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
No. P68/171.

protest 62/19809 (Los Angeles).

#### Seedman International Corp. *v.*United States,

Beceworti-i, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of battery-operated horns similar in all material respects to those the subject of *S. Hiller & Co. et al.*v. *United States*(59 Cust. Ct. 79, C.D. 3082), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Virage Logic Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Alexander Shubat, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officers knowledge:

(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the dates presented.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/ Alexander Shubat                 
|Dr. Alexander Shubat                 
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|February 9, 2009
From: Foss, Ian

To: Vicki Shipley

Subject: RE: Reaffirmation Form - NCHER Comments

Date: Wednesday, April 08, 2015 1:35:00 PM

Attachments: 1845-XXXX_REA_20150408_Clean.docx

ED-2015-ICCD-0007-0006-A1.doc

Hi Vicki,

Thanks for your comments! Please see attached. We accepted almost all of your comments.

Ian Foss

From: Vicki Shipley [mailto:vshipley@ncher.us] 

Sent: Thursday, March 12, 2015 10:20 PM

To: Foss, Ian

Subject: Reaffirmation Form - NCHER Comments

Importance: High

Hi and TGIF! Thanks again for making sure we’re in the loop with all the “forms stuff” – it is

 much appreciated! Here’s an advance copy of our comments – as I mentioned earlier, we

 do believe it makes sense for the FFEL program folks to use the same form We do have some

 suggested edits that we believe help with the flow......take a look and I’ll be curious if you

 think we improved it or otherwise!? Have a great weekend!

************************************

Attached:

· the draft form as released by ED (1845-XXXX REA 20141222)

· the workgroup’s comments (Reaffirmation Agreement Comment form FINAL

 DRAFT 03022015)

· a marked up form that reflects the comments (1845-XXXX REA 20141222

 REVISED 03022015), and

· a clean copy of the form ((1845-XXXX REA 20141222 REVISED CLEAN COPY

 03022015).

Please note that our comments reflect (1) a workflow that begins with the school, and

 (2) the use of this form for FFELP loan holders as well as FSA servicers.
[Letterhead of DANZIGER & HOCHMAN]

Exhibit 23.1


October 30, 2006


Board of Directors
On The Go Healthcare, Inc.
85 Corstate Avenue
Unit #1
Concord, Ontario
L4K 4Y2

Dear Sirs:

This letter is to constitute our consent to include the Report of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm of On The Go Healthcare, Inc. as of
July 31, 2006 and 2005 in this Form 10KSB contemporaneously herewith and
subject to any required amendments thereto.


Yours very truly,

DANZIGER & HOCHMAN


/s/DANZIGER & HOCHMAN
------------------------
DANZIGER & HOCHMAN
Chartered Accountants

<PAGE>
No. 57912.

protests 208718-K, 210049-K, and 211515-K (New York).

#### Freund Mayer & Co., Inc., and H. W. Robinson & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

Paper napkins stipulated to be similar in all material respects to the merchandise the subject of *Freund Mayer & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(39 C. C. P. A. 123, C. A. D. 474) were held dutiable at 15 percent under the provision in paragraph 1413, as modified by T. D. 51802, for paper, embossed, cut, die-cut, or stamped into shapes. Other items of the merchandise stipulated, to consist of manufactures of paper wádding or manufactures of pulp wadding the same as importations which are currently being classified as manufactures of paper wadding or pulp wadding, pursuant to the provision therefor in paragraph 1404, as modified, *supra,*were held dutiable under said paragraph at 6 cents per pound and 7% percent ad valorem.
EXHIBIT 32.1


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
(18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of Metro One Development, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended July 31, 2008
(the "Form 10-KSB") of the Company fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the
information contained in the Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


Dated: December 16, 2008



By: /s/ Stuart Turk
------------------------------------
        Stuart Turk
        President and
        Chief Executive Officer


Date: December 16, 2008



By: /s/ Evan Schwartzberg
------------------------------------
        Evan Schwartzberg
        Chief Financial Officer,
        Principal Accounting Officer

<PAGE>
No. 49533.

#### Protests 101436-K, etc., of Mitchel F. Barnet (New York).

Opinion by

WalkeR, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the hides in question are similar to those the subject of *Rice*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 118, C. D. 807), which record was incorporated herein, the court hold them dutiable as claimed.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Virage Logic Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending December 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Christine Russell, Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the
requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly
presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.



|                                                                    
|--------------------------------------------------------------------
|/s/ Christine Russell                                               
|Christine Russell                                                   
|Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
|February 9, 2007
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 24.2


                        CONSENT OF KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP

The Board of Directors
SpeedFam International, Inc.

      We consent to incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement on
Form S-8 pertaining to the 1995 Stock Plan for Employees and Directors of
SpeedFam International, Inc. of our reports dated June 26, 1998, relating to the
consolidated balance sheets of SpeedFam International, Inc. and subsidiaries as
of May 31, 1998 and 1997, and the related consolidated statements of earnings,
stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the three year
period ended May 31, 1998, and the related schedule, which reports appear in the
May 31, 1998, Annual Report on Form 10-K of SpeedFam International, Inc.




                                       KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP



Chicago, Illinois
November 24, 1998
psn-ex103_1470.htm



Exhibit 10.3

First Amendment to the
PARSONS EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN
2019 Amendment and Restatement

The Parsons Employee Stock Ownership Plan 2019 Amendment and Restatement (the “Plan”) is hereby amended as follows, in each case effective as of January 1, 2020:


	
1.
	
Section 7.2(b) of the Plan is hereby amended and restated to read as follows:




(b)He or she shall be fully vested in the balance of his or her Accounts upon the earliest to occur of:

(1)the day he or she becomes fully vested under the following schedule:


		
	
Years of Cumulative
Service
	
Vested Percentage of Employee’s
Account

	
Less than 1 year
	
0

	
1 year, but less than 2
	
33.33

	
2 years, but less than 3
	
66.67

	
3 years or more
	
100





	
(2)
	
the first day of the month in which he or she becomes 65 years of age, provided that such Participant is then employed by a Company or the Participant is on an Approved Absence;
	
 





	
(3)
	
his or her death while: 
	
 





	
 
	
(i)
	
employed by a Company; 
	
 





	
 
	
(ii)
	
on qualified military service (as defined in Section 414(u) of the Code); or 
	
 





	
 
	
(iii)
	
on an Approved Absence;
	
 





	
(4)
	
the date of his or her termination of employment with all Companies under circumstances entitling him to receive a benefit under Section 8.2(b) on account of permanent disability; or
	
 





	
(5)
	
the date on which he or she is required to be fully vested under the applicable provisions of the Code on account of the termination, partial termination or the complete discontinuance of contributions to the Plan.
	
 





	
2.
	
Section 15.3 of the Plan is hereby amended and restated to read as follows:




 

Minimum Vesting Requirement.  An Employee shall vest in his or her Accounts, within the meaning of Section 411 of the Code and Section 203 of ERISA, in accordance with the provisions of Section 7.2.

[Signature page follows.]

 



 


	

	
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this instrument of amendment is executed this ______ day of October, 2019.




PARSONS CORPORATION

By: 

Name: 

Title:
<TABLE> <S> <C>



<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>

THIS  SCHEDULE  CONTAINS  SUMMARY  FINANCIAL   INFORMATION  EXTRACTED  FROM  THE
UNAUDITED  FINANCIAL  STATEMENTS FOR THE NINE MONTH PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2000,
AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

</LEGEND>


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         401,033
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                        0
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               436,266
<PP&E>                                         532,568
<DEPRECIATION>                                (20,504)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 948,330
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           23,757
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         9,222
<OTHER-SE>                                     915,351
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   948,330
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                     0
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                        0
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               331,344
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (309,735)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (309,735)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (309,735)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (.03)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (.03)




</TABLE>
CENTRALIZED RECEIVABLES SERVICE 

(CRS) 

TECHNICAL BULLETIN

Number 21-07a

September 1, 2021

CRS Internet Browsers

Since Internet Explorer (IE) is no longer supported by Microsoft, effective immediately, CRS will only 

support Microsoft Edge (v86 or higher) and Google Chrome (v85 or higher). Please be sure to only use 

one of the supported Internet browsers when logging onto CRS.

Uploading Attachments

To mitigate security breach incidents, beginning October 2, 2021, CRS users will be presented with a pop-up 

when an attachment is uploaded, requiring the user to verify that the attachment belongs the appropriate 

debt/debtor before completing the upload. By clicking the pop-up, the user is confirming that the document has 

been verified as correct, complete, and sufficiently redacted. 

Attachment Properties

All attachments uploaded to CRS that are to be mailed to debtor must be in PDF format with the following 

properties:

* If a document with the same name is uploaded multiple times on the same day, only the latest 

document uploaded will be mailed to the debtor.

<end>

Properties of Attachments to be Mailed

PII must be redacted before uploading

PDF must not be password protected 

PDF must not be a fillable form

PDF must not contain embedded documents or forms

* Document Type must be “Agency Proof of Debt 1-5” when adding the document at case creation

* Document Type must be “Agency Proof of Debt 1-5 - Send to Debtor” for existing cases

The size of each PDF page must be 8 1⁄2” x 11”

The document orientation must be Portrait

PDF must not contain more than 50 pages

The maximum size of each attachment is 9.5 mb
Before the Second Division,

October 15, 1952

No. 56894.

#### Inter-Maritime Forwarding Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 173853-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of • 300 library sets, each of which consists of one gold-plated scissors (valued at more Lhan $1.75 per dozen) and one gold-plated letter opener, both in a sheath which is in chief value of leather; that said library sets are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Reed-Cook (Inc.) et al.*v. *United States*(63 Treas. Dec. 625, T. D. 46310); and that the protest is limited to the leather sheaths which have a total appraised value of $240. Upon the agreed statement of facts and following the cited authority, the leather cases were held properly dutiable at 17)4 percent under the provision in paragraph 1531, as modified by T. D. 51802, for manufactures of leather.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                       2,774,000
<SECURITIES>                               137,684,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               29,281,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (36,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0
<PP&E>                                      85,692,000
<DEPRECIATION>                              (2,261,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             319,107,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0
<BONDS>                                    110,013,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                    213,000
<COMMON>                                       420,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 198,654,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               319,107,000
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             3,693,000
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              (6,170,000)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           3,351,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              (597,000)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (224,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          (373,000)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 (373,000)
<EPS-BASIC>                                   (0.01)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.01)


</TABLE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : CRIMINAL ACTION 

 :

 v. :

 :

FERNANDO PEÑA : NO. 03-487-09

ORDER

AND NOW, this 11th day of May, 2009, upon consideration of Defendant Fernando Peña’s

“Motion to Reduce Sentence Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)” (Docket No. 586), and all

documents filed in connection therewith, and for the reasons stated in the accompanying

Memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant’s Motion is DENIED. 

BY THE COURT:

/s/ John R. Padova, J. 

______________________

John R. Padova, J.

Case 2:03-cr-00487-JP Document 591 Filed 05/12/09 Page 1 of 1
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1089

AN ACT

To require the Securities and Exchange Commission to require the improved disclosure of aftertax returns regarding mutual fund performance,

and for other purposes.
106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. R. 1089

AN ACT

To require the Securities and Exchange Commission to require the improved disclosure of after-tax returns regarding mutual fund performance, and for other purposes.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1089 EH

1 SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

2 This Act may be cited as the ‘‘Mutual Fund Tax

3 Awareness Act of 2000’’.

4 SEC. 2. FINDINGS.

5 The Congress finds the following:

6 (1) Taxes can be the single biggest cost associ7 ated with mutual funds. The average stock fund in8 vestor has lost up to 3 percentage points of return

9 every year to taxes.

10 (2) The average portfolio turnover rate for an

11 actively managed (nonindex) fund has increased

12 from 30 percent 20 years ago to almost 90 percent

13 today, and average capital gains distributions of

14 growth funds, per share, have more than doubled in

15 the last 10 years.

16 (3) If a fund’s performance is based mostly on

17 short-term gains, investors can lose a significant

18 part of their return to taxes.

19 (4) Performance figures that mutual funds gen20 erally disclose to their shareholders are net of fees

21 and expenses, but not taxes, and therefore do not

22 represent the impact taxes have on an investor’s re23 turn.

24 (5) This disclosure focuses on how much money

25 investors made before taxes, and not on how much

26 money investors actually got to keep.
3

•HR 1089 EH

1 (6) Improved disclosure of the effect of taxes on

2 mutual fund performance would allow shareholders

3 to compare after-tax returns to raw performance,

4 and would permit the investors to determine whether

5 the fund manager tries to minimize tax con6 sequences for shareholders.

7 (7) While the mutual fund prospectus details

8 the average annual portfolio turnover rate, the pro9 spectus may not expressly inform shareholders about

10 the impact the portfolio turnover rate has on total

11 returns.

12 SEC. 3. IMPROVEMENTS IN DISCLOSURE REQUIREMENTS.

13 Within 18 months after the date of the enactment

14 of this Act, the Securities and Exchange Commission shall

15 revise regulations under the Securities Act of 1933 and

16 the Investment Company Act of 1940 to require, con17 sistent with the protection of investors and the public in18 terest, improved disclosure in investment company

19 prospectuses or annual reports of after-tax returns to in20 vestors.

Passed the House of Representatives April 3, 2000.

Attest:

Clerk.