alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

IN RE : CIVIL ACTION

DVI, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION : No. 03-5336

ORDER

AND NOW, this 4th day of January 2016, upon consideration of the motion and request by 

Kam Sitthidet and Ron Sitthideth to be excluded from this class action, and the submissions by 

Lead Plaintiffs and by Defendant Deloitte & Touche LLP,1 it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ 

Lead Counsel/Class Counsel, Clinton A. Krislov, Esquire, of Krislov & Associates, Ltd., is 

directed to submit to the Court as soon as practicable, and by no later than Friday, January 29, 

2016, records and other proof evidencing the date on which the Claims Administrator, Strategic 

Claims Services (“SCS”), mailed to Kam Sitthidet and Ron Sitthideth the “Notice of Hearing on 

Proposed Settlements, Plan of Allocation, Attorneys’ Fees and Expenses, Lead Plaintiffs’ Cost 

Recovery Service Award and Voluntary Dismissal of Two Defendants” (Doc. No. 999, Ex. A 

(Doc. No. 999-4)), including:

(1) Notice of the “Stipulation and Agreement of Settlement With Deloitte & 

Touche LLP” (Doc. No. 999, Ex. 2 (Doc. No. 999-2), Ex. A (Doc. No. 

999-4));

(2) Notice of the settlement hearing that was held on June 23, 2015 (Doc. No. 

999, Ex. A (Doc. No. 999-4)); and

(3) Proof of Claim and Release form (Doc. No. 999, Ex. D (Doc. No. 999-7)).

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Legrome D. Davis

Legrome D. Davis, J. 

 1

 See the Sitthideths= AMotion to Reconsider a Few Class Members@ (Doc. No. 1009); Lead 

Plaintiffs= Response (Doc. No. 1010); ASitthidet Response and Rebuttal,@ with Ex. B, the Sitthideths= TD 

Ameritrade statement (Doc. No. 1013); Lead Plaintiffs= Reply (Doc. No. 1014), with Ex. 1, Kam Sitthidet=s 

letter, dated Sept. 17, 2015 (Doc. No. 1014-2). See also Deloitte=s letter, dated Oct. 1, 2015 (Doc. No. 

1016); ALead Plaintiffs=/Class Counsel Position on Sitthideths= Request to Be Excluded@ (Doc. No. 1018). 

Case 2:03-cv-05336-LDD Document 1019 Filed 01/04/16 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 216 (Thursday, November 9, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 77261]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-24821]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

Foreign-Trade Zones Board

[B-45-2023]


Foreign-Trade Zone (FTZ) 107; Authorization of Production 
Activity; Lely North America, Inc.; (Automated Milking and Feeding 
Equipment); Pella, Iowa

    On July 7, 2023, Lely North America, Inc. submitted a notification 
of proposed production activity to the FTZ Board for its facility 
within Subzone 107E in Pella, Iowa.
    The notification was processed in accordance with the regulations 
of the FTZ Board (15 CFR part 400), including notice in the Federal 
Register inviting public comment (88 FR 45390, July 17, 2023). On 
November 6, 2023, the applicant was notified of the FTZ Board's 
decision that no further review of the activity is warranted at this 
time. The production activity described in the notification was 
authorized, subject to the FTZ Act and the FTZ Board's regulations, 
including section 400.14.

    Dated: November 6, 2023.
Elizabeth Whiteman,
Executive Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-24821 Filed 11-8-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Spectra Energy Capital, LLC on Form 10-Q for the period
ending September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Gregory L. Ebel, President and Chief Executive Officer of Spectra Energy Capital LLC, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Spectra Energy Capital, LLC.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------





|                        |  |                                                      
|----------------------- |  | -----------------------------------------------------
|Date: November 14, 2007 |  | /s/ Gregory L. Ebel                                  
|                        |  | Gregory L. Ebel President and Chief Executive Officer
|
No. 61740.

#### Roberts Reilly & Sons *v.*United States,

protest 310377-K (New York).

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
(b) (6)


(b) (6)
Exhibit 32.1



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO



18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Shoe Pavilion, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended July 3, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Dmitry Beinus, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and I, John D. Hellmann, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to §
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                                       
|---------------------------------------
|/s/ Dmitry Beinus                      
|Chairman and Chief Executive Officer   
|August 16, 2004                        
|                                       
|/s/ John D. Hellmann                   
|Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
|August 16, 2004                        



This certification accompanies the
Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
<PAGE>


                                  EXHIBIT 32.2
                                  ------------

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Home Loan Financial Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date of this Certification
(the "Report"), I, Preston W. Bair, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



          1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
          of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

          2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



/s/ Preston W. Bair
-------------------------------
Preston W. Bair, Chief Financial Officer


Date:  November 14, 2003





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                                                                             29.
No. 52475.

protest 136701-K (New York).

#### B. Altman & Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of.the merchandise consist of knitted wool scarves the same in all material respects as those involved in Abstract 50303, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 61715.

#### Glensder Textile Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 302304-K (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silk scarves or squares similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *The Specialty House, Inc., Bryant & Heffernan, Inc., et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 136, C. A. D. 585), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
(b) (6)

(b) (6)





(b) (6)
No. 59944.

#### Garay & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 261252-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of elastic fabrics similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 59734, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 57184.

protest 191562-K (New York).

#### Traders Service Corporation *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

From an examination of the papers in the ease the court was unable to find anything to overcome the presumption of correctness of the collector’s classification. The protest was therefore overruled.
November 17, 1958

No. 62458.

Suit 4961.

#### United States *v.*Sciaky Bros., Inc.

C. D. 1972. (Appeal dismissed October 1, 1958.)
Before the Third Division,

November 29, 1956

No. 60394.

protests 150246-K and 171548-K (St. Albans).

#### A. N. Deringer, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of beef similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Swift & Company et al.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 212, C. D. 1655), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 14-2057

In re: ANTHONY A. BLAGROVE, a/k/a Tony,

Petitioner.

On Petition for Writ of Mandamus.

 (2:95-cr-00052-RGD-1)

Submitted: December 18, 2014 Decided: December 22, 2014

Before SHEDD, WYNN, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Petition denied by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony A. Blagrove, Petitioner Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Anthony A. Blagrove petitions for a writ of mandamus, 

alleging that the district court has unduly delayed acting on 

his “Jurisdictional Question” filed on April 23, 2012. He seeks 

an order from this court directing the district court to act. 

Our review of the district court’s docket reveals that the 

filing was not docketed as a motion. In any event, the district

court has sufficiently addressed Blagrove’s jurisdictional 

argument in a subsequent order entered on March 10, 2014. 

Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition as moot. We grant 

leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process. 

PETITION DENIED
No. 68659.

protests 62/19581,etc. (New York).

#### Lafayette Radio Electronics Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of multitesters and milliammeter and meter movements similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *G. L. Electronics, Inc., Arrow Sales, Inc.*(49 CCPA 111, C.A.D. 804), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
United States Court of Appeals

For the Seventh Circuit

Chicago, Illinois 60604

Submitted March 29, 2007

Decided March 30, 2007

Before

Hon. FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge

 Hon. JOEL M. FLAUM, Circuit Judge

 Hon. TERENCE T. EVANS, Circuit Judge

No. 06-1778

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

MIGUEL QUINTANA-CASTRO,

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District

Court for the Northern District of Illinois,

Eastern Division

No. 05-CR-341

Harry D. Leinenweber, 

Judge.

O R D E R

Miguel Quintana-Castro, a Mexican citizen, was caught trying to sell cocaine

to high school students in Highland Park, Illinois. After his case was referred to

federal authorities, he pleaded guilty to being in the United States without

permission after his removal. See 8 U.S.C. §§ 1326(a), (b)(2). Twice before this

conviction Quintana-Castro had been removed after committing felonies, the first

time in 1998 following a conviction for burglary and the second time in 2002 after a

conviction for delivering cocaine. The district court calculated a guidelines

imprisonment range of 70 to 87 months and sentenced Quintana-Castro to 70

months. The district court explicitly rejected a sentence below the range citing

Quintana-Castro’s criminal history and recidivism, including that “just as of a year

ago he was selling drugs to children, to high school students.” Quintana-Castro

NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION

To be cited only in accordance with

 Fed. R. App. P. 32.1
No. 06-1778 Page 2

filed a timely notice of appeal, but his appointed counsel now seeks to withdraw

because he cannot discern a nonfrivolous basis for the appeal. See Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Quintana-Castro has not accepted our invitation to

comment on counsel’s motion. See Cir. R. 51(b). Our review of the record is limited

to the potential issues identified in counsel’s facially adequate brief. See United

States v. Schuh, 289 F.3d 968, 973-74 (7th Cir. 2002).

Counsel identifies only one potential issue: whether Quintana-Castro might

argue that his prison sentence is unreasonable because the Northern District of

Illinois does not have a “fast-track” program for immigration offenders. See

Prosecutorial Remedies and Tools Against the Exploitation of Children Today Act of

2003, Pub.L. No. 108-21, § 401, 117 Stat. 650, 675; U.S.S.G. § 5K3.1. As counsel

correctly notes, however, we have held that the absence of a fast-track program in

the sentencing district is not an acceptable reason for imposing a sentence below

the guidelines range. United States v. Rodriguez-Rodriguez, 453 F.3d 458, 462-63

(7th Cir.2006); see United States v. Martinez-Martinez, 442 F.3d 539, 542 (7th

Cir.2006); United States v. Galicia-Cardenas, 443 F.3d 553, 555 (7th Cir.2006) (per

curiam). Thus, we agree with counsel that this potential argument would be

frivolous.

Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the appeal is

DISMISSED.
No. 53903.

#### Fownes Bros. & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 137921-K (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). The claim of the plaintiff was therefore sustained.
EXHIBIT 32.2

               STATEMENT FURNISHED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
               SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002, 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         The  undersigned,  Thomas M. Lyons, is the Chief  Financial  Officer of
First Sentinel Bancorp, Inc. (the "Company").

         This statement is being  furnished in connection with the filing by the
Company of the  Company's  Quarterly  Report on Form 10-Q/A for the period ended
September 30, 2003 (the "Report").

         By execution of this statement, I certify that:

               A)   the Report fully complies with the  requirements  of Section
                    13(a) or 15(d) of the  Securities  Exchange  Act of 1934 (15
                    U.S.C. 78m(a) or 78o(d)) and

               B)   the information  contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                    all material respects,  the financial  condition and results
                    of  operations  of the  Company  as of the dates and for the
                    periods covered by the Report.

JANUARY 28, 2004                                  /s/ THOMAS M. LYONS
----------------                                  -------------------
Dated                                             Thomas M. Lyons,
                                                  Executive Vice President and
                                                  Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 23.1

                        CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the following Registration
Statements of our report dated February 7, 2003, with respect to the
consolidated financial statements of Grant Prideco, Inc. included in this
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002.

Form     Description

S-4      Issuance of $175,000,000 of Debt in connection with ReedHycalog
         acquisition (No. 333-102635-09)

S-3      Issuance of 9,731,834 shares of Common Stock in connection with
         ReedHycalog acquisition (No. 333-102630)

S-3      Issuance of 1,300,000 shares of Common Stock in connection with JSG
         acquisition (No. 333-84956)

S-8      Grant Prideco, Inc. 2001 Stock Option Plan (No. 333-84958)

S-8      Grant Prideco, Inc. 401(k) Savings Plan (No. 333-38020)

S-8      Grant Prideco, Inc. 2000 Employee Stock Option and Restricted Stock
         Plan; Grant Prideco, Inc. 2000 Non-Employee Director Stock Option
         Plan; Grant Prideco, Inc. Executive Deferred Compensation Plan; Grant
         Prideco, Inc. Foreign Executive Deferred Compensation Plan; Grant
         Prideco, Inc. Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors;
         Distribution Agreement between Grant Prideco, Inc. and Weatherford
         International, Inc. (No. 333-34746)


                                                        Ernst & Young LLP
# C_2015245EN.01003702.xml

| 27.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 245/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 245/37

---

Action brought on 22 May 2015 — Telefónica v Commission

(Case T-256/15)

(2015/C 245/44)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Telefónica, S.A. (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J. Ruiz Calzado and J. Domínguez Pérez, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Forms of order sought

Forms of order sought

| — | annul Article 1 of the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Article 1 of the contested decision;

| — | annul Article 4(1) of the contested decision insofar as it orders the Kingdom of Spain to put an end to the aid scheme referred to in Article 1; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Article 4(1) of the contested decision insofar as it orders the Kingdom of Spain to put an end to the aid scheme referred to in Article 1;

| — | annul Article 4(2),(3),(4) and (5) of the contested decision, insofar as it orders the recovery of the State aid established by the Commission; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Article 4(2),(3),(4) and (5) of the contested decision, insofar as it orders the recovery of the State aid established by the Commission;

| — | in the alternative, limit the recovery obligation laid down by Article 4(2) of the contested decision under the same conditions as those established in the First and Second Decisions, and |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, limit the recovery obligation laid down by Article 4(2) of the contested decision under the same conditions as those established in the First and Second Decisions, and

| — | order the Commission to bear the total costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to bear the total costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The contested decision in these proceedings is the same as that in Cases T-12/15, Banco de Santander and Santusa v Commission and T-252/15 Ferrovial SA and others v Commission.

Banco de Santander and Santusa

Commission

Ferrovial SA and others

Commission

The pleas and main arguments relied on are similar to those already raised in those cases.

It is claimed in particular that the Commission committed errors of law and assessment in examining the interpretation of the Spanish tax administration (DGT) and concluding that it amounts to a new measure likely to constitute new state aid, and in claiming that the first two decisions did not cover the possible application of the measure at issue to the acquisition of indirect shareholdings.

---
<PAGE>

                                                                    Exhibit 31.2

                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Michael D. Perry, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify
that:

      (1)   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Vitria
            Technology, Inc.; and

      (2)   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
            statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
            necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
            under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
            to the period covered by this report.


                                        By:  /s/  MICHAEL D. PERRY
                                             ----------------------------------
Date:  August 17, 2004                       Michael D. Perry
                                             Senior Vice President and Chief
                                             Financial Officer