alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 10.30

  

  
    

    

    ATTACHMENT 31

     

    ENROLLEES QUALIFIED FOR THE GOVERNMENT HEALTH PLAN UNDER TEMPORARY EXPANSIONS OF MEDICAID COVERAGE ELIGIBILITY

     

        

    	1.	
            DEFINITIONS

          


     

    	

          	1.1	
            "Emergency Medical Group ("EMG")
              A category of Enrollees qualified for GHP under a temporary expansion

                  of Medicaid coverage eligibility requirements during the COVID-19 pandemic.

            

          


    

    

    	

          	1.2	
            Emergency Medical Group Enrollees
              From November 15, 2020 to September 30, 202J, Potential Enrollees who
                  qualify for the Emergency Medical Group ("EMG") are eligible to participate under the Medicaid and CHIP programs under the GHP.  During this time, EMG Enrollees shall receive the same benefits as the eligible populations as defined in Section 1.3.1.

            

          


     

      

    	2.	
            ELIGIBILITY

          


     

      

    
      	 	
              2.1

            	
              EMG potential enrollees shall comply with eligibility requirements as set forth by the Medicaid Program for the establishment of the poverty level for eligibility certification. EMG enrollees may be considered Medicaid, CHIP or State Population according to Medicaid Program's eligibility certification.

            


    

    

    

    	3.	
            ENROLLMENT

          


     

      

    	

          	3.1	
            Effective Date of Enrollment for EMG.
              The effective Date of Enrollment for all Emergency  Medical Group Enrollees shall begin no earlier  than November 15, 2020. All other Enrollment processes

                  and procedures under Section 5.2 of this Contract shall apply, including those applicable provisions governing notification to Enrollees and Providers on Enrollment and changes in Enrollment status.

            

          


     

    	

          	3.2	
            Disenrollment.
              EMG Enrollees shall have a Term of Enrollment that expires on
                  September 30, 2021. Upon expiration of this term, EMG Enrollees shall undergo the same Disenrollment procedures set forth under Section 5.3 as applicable to Enrollees who are no longer eligible for the GH P.

            

          


     

      

    	4.	
            ATTACHMENT APPLICABILITY 

          


     

    

    
      This attachment supplements,   and,
          where   indicated,   supersedes   the   requirements contained in Articles J-61 of this Contract. The Contractor is required to follow all provisions pursuant to Articles J - 6 1 of this Contract unless
        otherwise stated in

        this attachment. Hence, all the terms and conditions of this Contract and its Attachments

              remain in full force and effect.
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION





Pursuant to the requirements set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. § 1350), Charles J. Link, Jr., Chief Executive Officer of NewLink Genetics Corporation (the “Company”), and John B. Henneman, III, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, each hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:





|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                   
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|1. | The Company’s Amendment to its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2015, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the “Amendment No. 1”), fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act; and




|   |                                                                                                                                                        
|-- | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|2. | The information contained in the Amendment fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




Dated: May 20, 2016





By:/s/ Charles J. Link, Jr.Charles J. Link, Jr.Chief Executive Officer(Principal Executive Officer)


By:/s/ John B. Henneman IIIJohn B. Henneman IIIChief Financial Officer(Principal Financial Officer)








A signed original of this written statement has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its Staff upon request. This certification “accompanies” the


Form 10-K/A to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-K/A), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
No. 55128.

#### Aris Gloves, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 18071-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Eord, J.

The protests were dismissed.
EXHIBIT 99.5

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS

We
hereby consent to the use of our name in the Annual Report on Form 40-F (the "Annual Report") of Enerplus Corporation (the "Registrant"). We hereby
further consent to the inclusion in the Annual Report of the Registrant's Annual Information Form dated March 9, 2012 for the year ended December 31, 2011, which document makes reference
to our firm and our reports dated January 30, 2012, evaluating the Registrant's oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids interests effective December 31, 2011.

Calgary, Alberta, Canada
March 9, 2012

MCDANIEL & ASSOCIATES CONSULTANTS LTD./s/ P.A. WELCH P.A. Welch, P. Eng.
President & Managing Director


---



QuickLinks
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

 
 

Exhibit 10.9(b)    
    


September 9,
2003 


Dr. Walter
Vandaele

3034 Cleveland Avenue N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20008 




	Re:
	Director Employment Agreement





Dear
Walter: 


        In
accordance with our recent discussions, this letter modifies the compensation terms outlined in your Director employment letter dated October 13, 2000, as amended by that
certain First Amendment to Employment Letter dated effective as of June 13, 2003 (collectively, the "Original Letter") in the following manner: 


        Effective
as of the date on which LECG Corporation, as successor in interest to LECG Holding Company, LLC, completes its initial public offering (the
"IPO") and continuing thereafter until changed by mutual agreement, you will be entitled to receive a fixed annual draw of $500,000 paid in equal
monthly installments of $41,666 (the "Advance"). The Advance will be credited against your Fee Pass Through and Project Origination Fees, as those
concepts are defined in the Original Letter (collectively, "Earnings") such that, in the event your Earnings exceed the Advance in any period, LECG will
pay you an additional amount equal to the amount by which your Earnings exceed the Advance. Payment of such additional amount, if any, will be made in accordance with LECG's standard payroll policies
and procedures. Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the event your Earnings do not exceed the Advance, you will not be obligated to repay any portion of the Advance to LECG. 


        Until
the IPO is not completed, your compensation will continue to be governed by the Original Letter. 


        All
of us at LECG are pleased that you are continuing as a Director on these terms. Please sign below to indicate your acceptance of the terms contained in this letter. 


Sincerely,




	

/s/  DAVID KAPLAN      
 David Kaplan

President	

 
	

DK/jw	

 
	

THE FOREGOING IS ACCEPTED AND AGREED:	

 
	

/s/  DR. WALTER VANDAELE      
 Dr. Walter Vandaele	

 





Dated:                        ,
2003 









QuickLinks



Exhibit 10.9(b)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

DOROTHY BICK :

: CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-CV-4109

Plaintiff, :

:

v. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION;

BAYER AG;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE;

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM

:

:

:

:

:

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

:

Defendants. :

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of the Court:

Kindly enter the appearances of Hope S. Freiwald, Aline Fairweather, Erin

Brennan and Kirstin J. Miller as attorneys for defendant GlaxoSmithKline PLC.

Respectfully Submitted,

_____________________________ _____________________________

Hope S. Freiwald Aline Fairweather

_____________________________ _____________________________

Erin Brennan Kirstin J. Miller

DECHERT PRICE & RHOADS

4000 Bell Atlantic Tower

1717 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2793

(215) 994-4000

Case 2:02-cv-04109-WY Document 6 Filed 09/11/2002 Page 1 of 1
# C_2015311EN.01005301.xml

| 21.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 311/53 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

21.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 311/53

---

Action brought on 9 July 2015 — Preferisco Foods v OHIM — Piccardo & Savore' (PREFERISCO)

(Case T-371/15)

(2015/C 311/57)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Preferisco Foods Ltd (Vancouver, Canada) (represented by: G. Macias Bonilla, P. López Ronda, G. Marín Raigal, E. Armero, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Piccardo & Savore' Srl (Chiusavecchia, Italy)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Applicant: Applicant

Applicant:

Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word element ‘PREFERISCO’ — Community trade mark No 10 974 616

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before OHIM:

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 15 April 2015 in Case R 2598/2013-2

Contested decision:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | partially annul the contested decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the OHIM dated 15 April 2015, in Case R-2598/2013-2, in particular regarding the rejection of the CTM application No 10974616 ‘PREFERISCO’ for the goods applied for in classes 29 and 30; |
| --- | --- |

—

partially annul the contested decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the OHIM dated 15 April 2015, in Case R-2598/2013-2, in particular regarding the rejection of the CTM application No 10974616 ‘PREFERISCO’ for the goods applied for in classes 29 and 30;

| — | order that costs of the proceedings be borne by the Defendant, including the costs those incurred in the proceedings before the Opposition Division and the Second Board of Appeal of the OHIM. |
| --- | --- |

—

order that costs of the proceedings be borne by the Defendant, including the costs those incurred in the proceedings before the Opposition Division and the Second Board of Appeal of the OHIM.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
EXHIBIT 31.2
 SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
 I, Robert D. Burr., CERTIFY THAT:
 1.
    
    I have reviewed this 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 of Bayou City Exploration, Inc.;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this
report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The small business issuers other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
 a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls
and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the small business
issuer, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the small
business issuers disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our
conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the
end of the period covered by this report based
on such evaluation;c)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the
small business issuers internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the
small business issuers most recent fiscal
quarter (the small business issuers fourth
quarter in the case of an annual report) that
has materially affected, or is reasonably
likely to materially affect, the small
business issuers internal control over
financial reporting; and
 5.
    
    The small business issuers certifying officer(s) have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors
and the audit committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing
the equivalent function):
 a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material
weaknesses in the design or operation of
internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the small business issuers ability to
record, process, summarize and report
financial information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that
involves management or other employees who
have a significant role in the small business
issuers internal controls over financial
reporting.
  /s/ Robert D. BurrRobert D. BurrActing Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Spectra Energy Capital, LLC on Form 10-Q for the period
ending June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Sabra L. Harrington, Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Controller of Spectra Energy Capital, LLC, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



| | (1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Spectra Energy Capital, LLC.
| | --- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                      |  |                                                       
|--------------------- |  | ------------------------------------------------------
|Date: August 14, 2007 |  | /s/ Sabra L. Harrington                               
|                      |  | Sabra L. Harrington                                   
|                      |  | Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Controller
Exhibit 23.2


August 4, 2010


CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Washington, DC 20549


Ladies and Gentlemen:

We hereby consent to the incorporation and use in this Annual Report
(Form 10-K ) of Metro One Development, Inc. of our audit report, dated
July 28, 2010, relating to the accompanying audited financial statements
(and related statements included there in) as of July 31, 2009 which
appears in the Annual Report.



De Joya Griffith & Company, LLC

/s/ De Joya Griffith & Company, LLC
Henderson, NV
August 4, 2010


<PAGE>
# C_2015190EN.01002901.xml

| 8.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 190/29 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

8.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 190/29

---

Action brought on 14 April 2015 — CSTP Azienda della Mobilità v Commission

(Case T-186/15)

(2015/C 190/32)

Language of the case: Italian

Parties

Applicant: CSTP Azienda della Mobilità SpA (Salerno, Italy) (represented by: G. Capo and L. Visone, lawyers)

Defendant: European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the decision of the European Commission of 19 January 2015 on State aid SA.35842 (2014/C) (ex 2012/NN), notified to the applicant on 19 February 2015, implemented by Italy; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the European Commission of 19 January 2015 on State aid SA.35842 (2014/C) (ex 2012/NN), notified to the applicant on 19 February 2015, implemented by Italy;

| — | declare, in accordance with Article 263 TFEU and Article 264 TFEU, that the Commission’s decision of 19 January 2015 in the proceedings relating to State aid SA.35842 (2014/C) (ex 2012/NN) (for EUR 4 9 51  838) is entirely null and void in so far as it states that the sums awarded by way of compensation for public service obligations within the meaning of Regulation (EEC) No 1191/69, granted under Article 11 of that regulation in respect of tariff obligations in the Local Public Transport sector, could be deemed a non-notified measure constituting State aid under Article 107(1) TFEU which is incompatible with the internal market; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare, in accordance with Article 263 TFEU and Article 264 TFEU, that the Commission’s decision of 19 January 2015 in the proceedings relating to State aid SA.35842 (2014/C) (ex 2012/NN) (for EUR 4 9 51  838) is entirely null and void in so far as it states that the sums awarded by way of compensation for public service obligations within the meaning of Regulation (EEC) No 1191/69, granted under Article 11 of that regulation in respect of tariff obligations in the Local Public Transport sector, could be deemed a non-notified measure constituting State aid under Article 107(1) TFEU which is incompatible with the internal market;

| — | declare, in accordance with Article 263 TFEU and Article 264 TFEU, that the Commission’s decision of 19 January 2015 in the proceedings relating to State aid SA.35842 is entirely null and void in so far as it lays down operational measures for the recovery of aid paid by the Italian State; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare, in accordance with Article 263 TFEU and Article 264 TFEU, that the Commission’s decision of 19 January 2015 in the proceedings relating to State aid SA.35842 is entirely null and void in so far as it lays down operational measures for the recovery of aid paid by the Italian State;

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are those relied on in Case T-185/15 Buonotourist v Commission.

---
Document

Exhibit 10.14

Summary of the Registrant's Compensatory Arrangements with Executive Officers


Effective December 31, 2020, the current base salary for the Registrant's named executive officers was as follows:
									
	Name and Title		Base Salary for 2020
	F. Thomson Leighton
Chief Executive Officer		$1
	Edward McGowan
Chief Financial Officer		$475,000
	Robert Blumofe
EVP - Platform & General Manager Enterprise Division		$505,000
	Adam Karon
EVP and General Manager Media Division		$475,000
	Rick McConnell
President and General Manager Web Division 		$580,000
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk's Office, Atlanta, August 15, 2022. I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written. , Clerk. 

# Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA, August 15, 2022 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A22A1647. GREGORY WAYNE STOWE v. THE STATE.
Upon consideration of the APPELLANT'S motion FOR PERMISSION TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL in the above styled case, it is ordered that the motion be hereby GRANTED, and jurisdiction is released back to the trial court upon receipt of this order.
No. 61712.

#### Tice & Lynch, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 307914-K (New York).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

The protest was dismissed.
No. 64735.

#### John Heathcoat & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 326576-K and 58/11317 (New York).

*327Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise are the same in all material respects as those the subject of *E. C. Carter & Son, Inc.*v. *United States*(38 Cust. Ct. 368, C.D. 1889), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Case No. 8,964.

#### MAGRUDER v. BOWIE et al.

*[2*Cranch. C. C. 577.]1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

May Term, 1825.

Shipping —Part Owners — Partners—Ship’s Husband — Action por Freight.

Part owners of a ship are not joint partners. Each may maintain a separate action against the ship’s husband for his proportion of the freight, and it is no objection that the ship’s husband is one of the part owners.

Assumpsit for one-fourth part of the freight earned by the ship Alleghany, of which Ma-gruder owned one-fourth, Thomas Peter one-eighth, George Peter one-eighth, and the defendants [Bowie and Kurtz] one-half.

Mr. Marbury, for defendants,

contends that this is a partnership, and that one partner cannot sue another at law. The reasons applicable to general partnerships apply to this case as between these parties.

THE COURT

(THRUSTON, Circuit Judge, absent),

stopped Mr. Key and Mr. Dunlop, in reply, and said that part owners of a ship are not joint partners, each may maintain a separate action against the ship’s husband for his proportion of the freight, and that it was no objection that the ship’s husband was one of the part owners, as their interests were separate, and not joint.

Verdict for the plaintiff. $929.5S, with interest from 1S21.