Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 214 / Tuesday, November 7, 2023 / Notices 76729 

15See Order, 67 FR at 65947. 

16See section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act. 17See Order, 67 FR at 65947. 

1See Wooden Cabinets and Vanities and 

Components Thereof from the People’s Republic of 

China: Preliminary Results, Preliminary 

Determination of No Shipments, and Partial 

Recission of the Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review; 2021–2022, 88 FR 29086 (May 5, 2023) 

(Preliminary Results), and accompanying 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the 

Antidumping Duty Administrative Review of 

Wooden Cabinets and Vanities and Components 

Thereof from the People’s Republic of China; 2021– 

2022,’’ dated concurrently with, and hereby 

adopted by, this notice (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum). 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review,’’ dated August 14, 2023. 

appropriate entries without regard to 

antidumping duties. 

In accordance with Commerce’s 

‘‘automatic assessment’’ practice, for 

entries of subject merchandise during 

the POR produced by each respondent 

which did not know that its 

merchandise was destined for the 

United States, we will instruct CBP to 

liquidate entries not reviewed at the allothers rate of 20.11 percent 15 if there is 

no rate for the intermediate 

company(ies) involved in the 

transaction. 

For the companies which were not 

selected for individual review (i.e., 

Villacero, Talleres y Aceros, and 

Ternium), we will instruct CBP to assess 

antidumping duties at an ad valorem 

rate equal to the weighted-average 

dumping margin determined for the 

non-examined companies in the final 

results of this review. The final results 

of this review shall be the basis for the 

assessment of antidumping duties on 

entries of merchandise covered by the 

final results of this review and for future 

deposits of estimated duties, where 

applicable.16

Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 41 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review in the Federal Register, in 

accordance with 19 CFR 356.8(a). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective upon 

publication of the notice of final results 

of administrative review for all 

shipments of wire rod from Mexico 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the date of 

publication of the final results, as 

provided by section 751(a)(2) of the Act: 

(1) the cash deposit rate for the firms 

listed above will be equal to the 

dumping margins established in the 

final results of this review, except if the 

ultimate rates are de minimis within the 

meaning of 19 CFR 351.106(c)(1), in 

which case the cash deposit rates will 

be zero; (2) for merchandise exported by 

producers or exporters not covered in 

this administrative review but covered 

in a prior segment of the proceeding, the 

cash deposit rate will continue to be the 

company-specific rate published for the 

most recently completed segment of this 

proceeding in which the producer or 

exporter participated; (3) if the exporter 

is not a firm covered in this review, a 

prior review, or the original less-thanfair-value investigation but the producer 

is, then the cash deposit rate will be the 

rate established for the most recently 

completed segment of the proceeding 

for the producer of the merchandise; 

and (4) the cash deposit rate for all other 

producers or exporters will continue to 

be 20.11 percent, the all-others rate 

established in the antidumping duty 

investigation.17 These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a 

preliminary reminder to importers of 

their responsibility under 19 CFR 

351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate 

regarding the reimbursement of 

antidumping duties prior to liquidation 

of the relevant entries during this 

review period. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in 

Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

occurred and the subsequent assessment 

of double antidumping duties. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

results in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, 19 

CFR 351.213(h)(2), and 19 CFR 

351.221(b)(4). 

Dated: October 31, 2023. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Whether Application of Facts Available 

and Use of Adverse Inference Is 

Appropriate 

V. Rate for Respondents Not Selected for 

Individual Examination 

VI. Discussion of Methodology 

VII. Currency Conversion 

VIII. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2023–24583 Filed 11–6–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–570–106] 

Wooden Cabinet and Vanities and 

Components Thereof From the 

People’s Republic of China: Final 

Results and Final Determination of No 

Shipments of the Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2021–2022 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) determines that 

Fujian Dushi Wooden Industry Co., Ltd. 

(Dushi) and The Ancientree Cabinet Co., 

Ltd. (Ancientree) made sales of wooden 

cabinets and vanities and components 

thereof (cabinets) at prices below 

normal value and eight companies had 

no shipments of subject merchandise 

during the period of review (POR) April 

1, 2021, through March 31, 2022. 

DATES: Applicable November 7, 2023. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Jacob Keller, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4849. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On May 5, 2023, Commerce published 

in the Federal Register the Preliminary 

Results of the antidumping duty 

administrative review and invited 

interested parties to comment.1 For a 

complete description of the events that 

occurred since Commerce published the 

Preliminary Results, see the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum.2 On August 14, 

2023, we extended the deadline for 

these final results to November 1, 2023.3

Commerce conducted this review in 

accordance with section 751(a) of the 

Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
76730 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 214 / Tuesday, November 7, 2023 / Notices 

4See Wooden Cabinets and Vanities and 

Components Thereof from the People’s Republic of 

China: Antidumping Duty Order, 85 FR 22126 

(April 21, 2020) (Order). 

5See Preliminary Results, 88 FR at 29087. 

6See Issues and Decision Memorandum at 

Comment 8. 

7See Non-Market Economy Antidumping 

Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 76 

FR 65694 (October 24, 2011) (Assessment Notice). 

8See Appendix II. 

9As explained in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum, because there are only two relevant 

weighted-average dumping margins for these 

preliminary results, using a weighted average of 

these two rates risks disclosure of business 

proprietary information (BPI) data. 

10See Appendix II. 

11See 19 CFR 351.106(c)(2). 

Scope of the Order 4

The products covered by this Order 

are wooden cabinets and vanities that 

are for permanent installation 

(including floor mounted, wall 

mounted, ceiling hung or by attachment 

of plumbing), and wooden components 

thereof. For full description of the scope 

of the Order, see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the parties’ briefs 

are addressed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. A list of the issues 

addressed is included as Appendix I to 

this notice. The Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is a public document and 

is on file electronically via Enforcement 

and Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at https://access.trade.gov/ 

public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Changes from the Preliminary Results 

Based on our analysis of the 

comments received, Commerce made 

certain revisions to the calculations of 

the preliminary weighted-average 

dumping margins assigned to 

Ancientree and Dushi, and the nonexamined separate rate respondents. 

Commerce is also assigning separate 

rates to Suzhou Siemo Wood Import & 

Export Co., Ltd. (Siemo) and Jiangsu 

Weisen Houseware Co., Ltd. (Jiangsu 

Weisen). Regarding Siemo, we are 

accepting its separate rate certification 

because it has a suspended entry of 

subject merchandise that entered the 

United States during the POR. 

Regarding Jiangsu Weisen, we find that 

the entries associated with Weisen 

Housewares Co., Ltd. (Weisen) are 

entries of subject merchandise 

applicable to Jiangsu Weisen. Further, 

based on information on the record, we 

are now considering Weisen to be the 

same entity as Jiangsu Weisen. As a 

result, we are assigning Jiangsu Weisen 

a separate rate and no longer consider 

Weisen to be part of the China-wide 

entity. The Issues and Decision 

Memorandum contains a more detailed 

discussion of these revisions. 

Final Determination of No Shipments 

In the Preliminary Results, Commerce 

determined that certain companies did 

not have shipments of subject 

merchandise during the POR.5 As we 

received no information to contradict 

our preliminary determination with 

respect to those companies, we continue 

to find that they made no shipments of 

subject merchandise to the United 

States during the POR. Additionally, we 

find that Siemo had shipments of 

subject merchandise during the POR 

and, therefore, are granting Siemo a 

separate rate in this administrative 

review.6 Accordingly, we will issue 

appropriate instructions that are 

consistent with our ‘‘automatic 

assessment’’ clarification for the no 

shipment companies listed in Appendix 

II.7

Rates for Non-Examined Separate Rate 

Respondents 

Commerce determines that 25 

companies, not individually examined, 

are eligible for separate rates in this 

administrative review.8 The Act and 

Commerce’s regulations do not address 

the establishment of a separate rate to be 

applied to companies not selected for 

individual examination when 

Commerce limits its examination in an 

administrative review pursuant to 

section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally, 

Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of 

the Act, which provides instructions for 

calculating the all-others rate in an 

investigation, for guidance when 

calculating the rate for separate rate 

respondents which Commerce did not 

examine individually in an 

administrative review. Section 

735(c)(5)(A) of the Act states that the allothers rate should be calculated by 

averaging the weighted-average 

dumping margins calculated for 

individually-examined respondents, 

excluding dumping margins that are 

zero, de minimis, or based entirely on 

facts available. Accordingly, in the final 

results of review, we are assigning to the 

non-selected separate rate respondents 

an estimated weighted-average dumping 

margin based on the average of 

Ancientree’s and Dushi’s rates weighted 

by their publicly available ranged U.S. 

sales values.9

China-Wide Entity 

Commerce considers all other 

companies, listed in Appendix II of this 

notice, for which a review was 

requested, and which did not 

demonstrate separate rate eligibility, to 

be part of the China-wide entity. 

Final Results of Administrative Review 

Commerce determines that the 

following weighted-average dumping 

margin exists for the administrative 

review covering the period April 1, 

2021, through March 31, 2022: 

Exporter 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Fujian Dushi Wooden Industry 

Co., Ltd ................................... 43.40 

The Ancientree Cabinet Co., Ltd 8.26 

Non-Selected Companies Under 

Review Receiving a Separate 

Rate 10 ..................................... 12.03 

Disclosure 

Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.224(b), within 

five days of the publication of this 

notice in the Federal Register, we will 

disclose to the parties to this 

proceeding, the calculations that we 

performed for these final results of 

review. 

Assessment Rates 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C) of the 

Act and 19 CFR 351.212(b), Commerce 

intends to determine, and U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection (CBP) shall 

assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries of subject 

merchandise in accordance with these 

final results of review. Pursuant to 19 

CFR 351.212(b)(1), for Ancientree and 

Dushi, because we do not have entered 

values for all U.S. sales to a particular 

importer (or customer), Commerce 

calculated importer-specific per-unit 

assessment rates by dividing the total 

amount of dumping for reviewed sales 

of subject merchandise to that importer 

by the total quantity sold to that 

importer. Where an importer-specific 

per-unit assessment rate is zero or de 

minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent), 

Commerce will instruct CBP to liquidate 

appropriate entries without regard to 

antidumping duties.11

For all non-selected separate rate 

applicants subject to this review, we 

will instruct CBP to liquidate all entries 

of subject merchandise that entered the 

United States during the POR at the 

weighted-average of the rates calculated 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 214 / Tuesday, November 7, 2023 / Notices 76731 

12For a full discussion of this practice, see 

Assessment Notice. 

13See Order, 85 FR at 22126. 

for Ancientree and Dushi, as listed 

above. For entries of subject 

merchandise during the POR produced 

by Ancientree and Dushi for which they 

did not know their merchandise was 

destined for the United States, we 

intend to instruct CBP to liquidate such 

entries at the China-wide rate if there is 

no rate for the intermediate company or 

companies involved in the transaction. 

Consistent with Commerce’s 

assessment practice in non-market 

economy cases, for the companies 

which Commerce determined had no 

shipments of the subject merchandise, 

any suspended entries made under 

those exporters’ case numbers (i.e., at 

the exporters’ rates) will be liquidated at 

the China-wide rate.12

Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of review 

in the Federal Register. If a timely 

summons is filed at the U.S. Court of 

International Trade, the assessment 

instructions will direct CBP not to 

liquidate relevant entries until the time 

for parties to file a request for a statutory 

injunction has expired (i.e., within 90 

days of publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective for all 

shipments of the subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date of the final results of 

this administrative review, as provided 

by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the 

cash deposit rate for the companies 

subject to this review will be the rate 

established in these final results of the 

review; (2) for previously investigated or 

reviewed Chinese and non-Chinese 

exporters not listed above that have 

separate rates, the cash deposit rate will 

continue to be the exporter-specific rate 

published for the most recently 

completed segment of this proceeding in 

which they were reviewed; (3) for all 

Chinese exporters of subject 

merchandise that have not been found 

to be entitled to a separate rate, the cash 

deposit rate will be equal to the 

weighted-average dumping margin for 

the China-wide entity (i.e., 251.64 

percent); and (4) for all non-Chinese 

exporters of subject merchandise which 

have not received their own separate 

rate, the cash deposit rate will be the 

rate applicable to the Chinese 

exporter(s) that supplied that nonChinese exporter.13 These cash deposit 

requirements, when imposed, shall 

remain in effect until further notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to importers of their 

responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) 

to file a certificate regarding the 

reimbursement of antidumping and/or 

countervailing duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this POR Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in 

Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping and/or 

countervailing duties occurred and the 

subsequent assessment of double 

antidumping duties, and/or an increase 

in the amount of antidumping duties by 

the amount of countervailing duties. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to parties subject to an 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 

information disclosed under APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), 

which continues to govern BPI in this 

segment of the proceeding. Timely 

written notification of the return or 

destruction of APO materials, or 

conversion to judicial protective order, 

is hereby requested. Failure to comply 

with the regulations and terms of an 

APO is a sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing these 

final results of review in accordance 

with sections 751(a)(l), 751(a)(2)(B), and 

777(i) of the Act. 

Dated: November 1, 2023. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix I 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Changes from the Preliminary Results 

V. Discussion of the Issues 

Comment 1: Whether Commerce Should 

Apply Total Adverse Facts Available 

(AFA) to Ancientree 

Comment 2: Whether Commerce Should 

Select Malayasia as the Primary 

Surrogate Country (SC) 

Comment 3: Whether Commerce Should 

Revise the Respondents’ Sigma Freight 

Calculations 

Comment 4: Whether Commerce Should 

Revise Certain Surrogate Values (SV) 

Comment 5: Whether Commerce Should 

Exclude Russian Non-Market Economy 

(NME) Imports into Bulgaria 

Comment 6: Whether Commerce Should 

Revise the Respondents’ Wood Density 

Values 

Comment 7: Whether Commerce Should 

Assign Jiangsu Wisen Houseware Co., 

Ltd. (Jinagsu Wiesen) and Weisen 

Houseware Co., Ltd. (Weisen), a Separate 

Rate 

Comment 8: Whether Commerce Should 

Accept Suzhou Siemo Wood Import & 

Export Co., Ltd.’s (Siemo) No Shipment 

Certification 

Comment 9: Whether Commerce Should 

Clarify its No Shipment Policy 

VI. Recommendation 

Appendix II 

No Shipment Companies 

1. Dalian Hualing Wood Co., Ltd. 

2. Dalian Meisen Woodworking Co., Ltd. 

3. Guangzhou Nuolande Import and Export 

Co., Ltd. 

4. Hangzhou Hoca Kitchen & Bath Products 

Co., Ltd. 

5. Linyi Kaipu Furniture Co., Ltd. 

6. Senke Manufacturing Company 

7. Shandong Longsen Woods Co., Ltd. 

8. Shouguang Fushi Wood Co., Ltd. 

Non-Selected Companies Under Review 

Receiving a Separate Rate 

1. Anhui Xinyuanda Cupboard Co., Ltd. 

2. Dongguan Ri Sheng Home Furnishing 

Articles Co., Ltd. 

3. Goldenhome Living Co., Ltd. 

4. Jiang Su Rongxin Wood Industry Co., Ltd. 

(Formerly known as Jiang Su Rongxin 

Cabinets Ltd.) 

5. Jiangsu Sunwell Cabinetry Co., Ltd. 

6. Jiangsu Weisen Houseware Co., Ltd; 

Weisen Houseware Co., Ltd. 

7. KM Cabinetry Co., Ltd. 

8. Kunshan Baiyulan Furniture Co., Ltd. 

9. Morewood Cabinetry Co., Ltd. 

10. Nantong Aershin Cabinets Co., Ltd. 

11. Quanzhou Ample Furnishings Co., Ltd. 

12. Qufu Xinyu Furniture Co., Ltd. 

13. Shanghai Beautystar Cabinetry Co., Ltd. 

14. Shanghai Zifeng International Trading 

Co., Ltd. 

15. Sheen Lead International Trading 

(Shanghai) Co., Ltd. 

16. Suzhou Siemo Wood Import & Export 

Co., Ltd. 

17. Taishan Oversea Trading Co., Ltd. 

18. Taizhou Overseas Int’l Ltd. 

19. Tech Forest Cabinetry Co., Ltd. 

20. Weifang Fuxing Wood Co., Ltd. 

21. Xiamen Adler Cabinetry Co., Ltd. 

22. Yichun Dongmeng Wood Co., Ltd. 

23. Yixing Pengjia Technology Co., Ltd. 

(Formerly known as Yixing Pengjia 

Cabinetry Co., Ltd.) 

24. Zhangzhou OCA Furniture Co., Ltd. 

25. Zhoushan For-strong Wood Co., Ltd. 

Companies Considered To Be Part of the 

China-Wide Entity 

1. Deqing Meisheng Import and Export Co., 

Ltd. 

2. Fujian Senyi Kitchen Cabinet Co., Ltd. 

3. Fuzhou Hauster Kitchen Cabinet 

Manufacturing Co., Ltd. 

4. Fuzhou Pyrashine Trading Co., Ltd. 

5. Jiang Su Rongxin Import and Export Co., 

Ltd. 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
76732 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 214 / Tuesday, November 7, 2023 / Notices 

1See Wooden Cabinets and Vanities and 

Components Thereof from the People’s Republic of 

China: Preliminary Results of Countervailing Duty 

Administrative Review, Rescission of 

Administrative Review in Part, and Intent To 

Rescind in Part; 2021, 88 FR 29084 (May 5, 2023) 

(Preliminary Results), and accompanying 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Review of 

Wooden Cabinets and Vanities and Components 

Thereof from the People’s Republic of China; 2021,’’ 

dated concurrently with, and hereby adopted by, 

this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum). 

3See Certain Corrosion Inhibitors from the 

People’s Republic of China: Antidumping Duty and 

Countervailing Duty Orders, 86 FR 14869 (March 

19, 2021) (Order). 

4See sections 771(5)(B) and (D) of the Act 

regarding financial contribution; section 771(5)(E) 

of the Act regarding benefit; and section 771(5A) of 

the Act regarding specificity. 

5See, e.g., Lightweight Thermal Paper from the 

People’s Republic of China: Notice of Rescission of 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2015, 

82 FR 14349 (March 20, 2017); and Circular Welded 

Carbon Quality Steel Pipe from the People’s 

Republic of China: Rescission of Countervailing 

Duty Administrative Review; 2017, 84 FR 14650 

(April 11, 2019). 

6See 19 CFR 351.212(b)(2). 

7See 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3). 

6. Linshu Meibang Furniture Co., Ltd. 

7. Shanghai Zifeng Industries Development 

Co., Ltd. 

8. Shenzhen Pengchengzhirong Trade Co., 

Ltd. 

9. Weihai Jarlin Cabinetry Manufacture Co., 

Ltd. 

10. Xiamen Got Cheer Co., Ltd. 

11. Yindu Kitchen Equipment Co., Ltd. 

12. Zaozhuang New Sharp Import & Export 

Trading Co., Ltd. 

13. ZBOM Cabinets Co., Ltd. 

14. Zhongshan KM Cabinetry Co., Ltd. 

[FR Doc. 2023–24602 Filed 11–6–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[C–570–107] 

Wooden Cabinets and Vanities and 

Components Thereof From the 

People’s Republic of China: Final 

Results and Partial Recission of 

Countervailing Duty Administrative 

Review; 2021 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) determines that 

countervailable subsidies were provided 

to certain producers and exporters of 

wooden cabinets and vanities and 

components thereof (wooden cabinets) 

from the People’s Republic of China 

(China) during the period of review 

(POR) January 1, 2021, through 

December 31, 2021. Commerce is also 

rescinding the review with respect to 

five companies. 

DATES: Applicable November 7, 2023. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Michael Romani or Richard Roberts, 

AD/CVD Operations, Office I, 

Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC, 20230; telephone: (202) 482–0198 or 

(202) 482–3464, respectively. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

Commerce published the Preliminary 

Results of this administrative review in 

the Federal Register on May 5, 2023, 

and invited interested parties to 

comment.1 For a complete description 

of the events that occurred subsequent 

to the Preliminary Results, see the Issues 

and Decision Memorandum.2

Scope of the Order 3

The products covered by the scope of 

the Order are wooden cabinets from 

China. A full description of the scope of 

the Order is contained in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised by the interested 

parties in their case and rebuttal briefs 

are addressed in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. A list of topics discussed 

in the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is provided in the 

appendix to this notice. The Issues and 

Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at https://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at https://access.trade.gov/public/ 

FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on our analysis of comments 

from interested parties and the evidence 

on the record, we revised the 

calculation of the net countervailable 

subsidy rates for Fujian Dushi Wooden 

Industry Co. (Dushi) and Jiangsu 

Sunwell Cabinetry Co., Ltd. (Sunwell). 

For a discussion of the issues, see the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum. 

Methodology 

Commerce conducted this 

administrative review in accordance 

with section 751(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff 

Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For 

each of the subsidy programs found to 

be countervailable, we find that there is 

a subsidy, i.e., a government-provided 

financial contribution that gives rise to 

a benefit to the recipient, and that the 

subsidy is specific.4 For a complete 

description of the methodology 

underlying all of Commerce’s 

conclusions, including our reliance, in 

part, on facts otherwise available, 

including adverse facts available, 

pursuant to sections 776(a) and (b) of 

the Act, see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. 

Partial Rescission of Review 

Commerce’s practice is to rescind an 

administrative review of a 

countervailing duty order, pursuant to 

19 CFR 351.213(d)(3), when there are no 

reviewable entries of subject 

merchandise during the POR for which 

liquidation is suspended.5 Normally, 

upon completion of an administrative 

review, the suspended entries are 

liquidated at the countervailing duty 

assessment rate calculated for the 

review period.6 Therefore, for an 

administrative review of a company to 

be conducted, there must be a 

reviewable, suspended entry that 

Commerce can instruct U.S. Customs 

and Border Protection (CBP) to liquidate 

at the calculated countervailing duty 

assessment rate calculated for the 

review period.7

We find five companies subject to this 

review: (1) Shouguang Fushi Wood Co., 

Ltd..; (2) Taizhou Overseas Int’l Ltd.; (3) 

Yixing Pengjia Technology Co., Ltd.; (4) 

Zaozhuang New Sharp Import & Export 

Trading Co., Ltd..; and (5) Zhoushan 

For-strong Wood Co., Ltd. did not have 

reviewable entries of subject 

merchandise for which liquidation is 

suspended. Because there is no 

evidence on the record that these five 

companies had entries, exports, or sales 

of subject merchandise during the POR, 

we are rescinding this review with 

respect to these five companies 

consistent with 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3). 

Companies Not Selected for Individual 

Review 

The statute and Commerce’s 

regulations do not address the 

establishment of a rate to be applied to 

companies not selected for individual 

examination when Commerce limits its 

examination in an administrative review 

pursuant to section 777A(e)(2) of the 

Act. However, Commerce normally 

determines the rates for non-selected 

companies in reviews in a manner that 

is consistent with section 705(c)(5) of 

the Act, which provides the basis for 

calculating the all-others rate in an 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES