alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit
      32.1





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Annual Report of Convera Corporation (the "Company") on
      Form
      10-K for the period ended January 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Patrick C. Condo,
      President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to
      18
      U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
      Act of 2002, that:





|(1) | The
              Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
              of
              the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|(2) | The
              information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
              respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
              Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







By: /s/
      Patrick C. Condo


Patrick
      C. Condo


President
      and Chief Executive Officer


March
      30,
      2006
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

BLUE BELL INN, INC. : : CIVIL ACTION

Plaintiff : :

vs. : : NO. 02-4068

ANDREW KAMARATOS, AGGI, L.P. : :

d/b/a BLUE BELL DINER 

Defendant : : (FULLAM, C.J.E.)

WITHDRAWAL OF APPEARANCE

TO THE CLERK:

Kindly withdraw my appearances on behalf of Andrew Kamaratos, AGGI,

L.P., d/b/a Blue Bell Diner, defendants in the above matter.

______________________________

Dated: ________________ JOSEPH T. PISCITELLO

Mellon Bank Center, Suite 1330

1735 Market Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

TO THE CLERK:

Kindly enter my appearance on behalf of Andrew Kamaratos, AGGI, LP,

d/b/a Blue Bell Diner, defendants in the above matter.

__________________________

ANNE M. DIXON

31st Floor, Lewis Tower 

225 South 15th Street

Philadelphia, PA 19102

215-735-5900

Dated: _______________ 215-735-4649 (fax)

Case 2:02-cv-04068-JF Document 9 Filed 10/03/2002 Page 1 of 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

A copy of the foregoing Withdrawal/Entry of Appearance was

forwarded to counsel for plaintiff, Frank J. Benasutti, Esquire,

One Boca Commerce Center, 551 N.W. 77th Street, Suite 111, Boca

Raton, FL 33487 by facsimile and first class mail on this date.

_____________________________

ANNE M. DIXON

Attorney for Defendant

ANDREW KAMARATOS, AGGI, L.P. 

d/b/a BLUE BELL DINER

Dated: October 2, 2002

Case 2:02-cv-04068-JF Document 9 Filed 10/03/2002 Page 2 of 2
No. 60722.

#### Henry Laber & Associates *v.*United States,

protest 275593-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

From a review of the record in this ease, the court found nothing tending in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the classification by the collector. The protest was therefore overruled.
No. 50315.

#### Protests 57084-K, etc., of Kopf Mfg. Co., Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83, decided February 5, 1945.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries. The protests were sustained to this extent.
No. 67271.

protests 62/4497, etc. (Los Angeles).

#### New York Merchandise Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *Falcon Sales Company*and *J. J. Murphy & Co.*v. *United States*(47 Cust. Ct. 129, C.D. 2292), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. P68/161.

protests 63/18509-S, etc. (New York).

#### Seedman International Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

Beckworth, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” covered by the foregoing protests consist of battery-operated horns similar in all material respects to those the subject of *S. Hiller & Co. et al.*v. *United States*(59 Cust. Ct. 79, C.D. 3082), and that the items of merchandise marked “C” covered by the foregoing protests consist of rubber bulb horns similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Sherwin Inter*national., *Inc.*v. *United States*(54 Cust. Ct. 466, Abstract 69382), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Tránh Bị Tịch Thu Tài Sản 

Thế Chấp Ngay Hôm Nay!

Được cung cấp bởi

Your Name Here 

Place your logo and contact 

information here. 
Đôi khi cuộc sống có những sự kiện không 

lường trước có thể gây ra khó khăn về mặt tài 

chính. Nếu quý vị gặp khó khăn trong việc chi trả 

khoản vay thế chấp hoặc dự đoán sẽ gặp trở ngại về 

mặt tài chính trong tương lai, chúng tôi có thể trợ giúp 

quý vị. Chúng ta có thể thảo luận các giải pháp giúp 

tránh bị tịch thu tài sản thế chấp và giữ được nhà, bao 

gồm cả việc sửa đổi theo chương trình Sửa Đổi Nhà

Giá Phải Chăng của liên bang. Nếu giữ nhà không phải 

là giải pháp tốt nhất, chúng ta có thể đánh giá các lựa 

chọn khác thay cho việc bị tịch thu tài sản thế chấp, 

giúp quý vị từ bỏ ngôi nhà mà không phải trải qua quy 

trình tịch thu nhà. Cuối cùng, chúng tôi muốn giúp quý 

vị cùng gia đình tìm kiếm giải pháp ổn định tình hình 

nhà ở và tài chính hiện tại. 

Use this panel for specific event or 

program information.
##### 



EXHIBIT 13  Certification Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code) Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Telenor ASA, a company incorporated under the laws of
Norway (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers
knowledge, that: The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the
Report) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in
the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company. Dated: April 2, 2004 /s/ Jon Fredrik BaksaasName: Jon Fredrik Baksaas
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer




---



##### 



Certification Pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
(Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States
Code) Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a)
and (b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), the
undersigned officer of Telenor ASA, a company incorporated under the laws of
Norway (the Company), hereby certifies, to such officers
knowledge, that: The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the
Report) of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a)
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in
the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company. Dated: April 2, 2004 /s/ Torstein MolandName: Torstein Moland
Title: Senior Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
No. 49058.

#### Protest 102898-K of New York Mdse. Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *United States*v. *Heinrich Herrmann & Weiss*(26 C. C. P. A. 292, C. A. D. 30), which record was incorporated herein, the protest was sustained to this extent.
www.316-a.comCooling 400,000 gpm of plant dischargewww.316-a.comCooling 600,000 gpm of plant dischargeRecycling Discharge Waterwww.316-b.comRecycling Discharge Waterwww.316-b.comCooling 1,000,000 gpm of discharge water
Case No. 14,361.

#### UNION BANK OF GEORGETOWN v. RIGGS.

[2 Cranch, C. C. 204.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

June Term, 1820.

Continuance — Supplemental Affidavit-Absent Witness.

1. The court will not receive a supplemental affidavit, to obtain a continuance of the cause.

2. The affidavit for a continuance, on the ground of the absence of a witness, must state *566that the affiant believes that the cause cannot he tried with safety to the party applying for the continuance, without the attendance of the witness.

The defendant’s affidavit, did not aver that he verily believed that the cause could not be tried with safety to himself, without the attendance of the absent witness.

Mr. Ivey, for plaintiff,

objected to the continuance, upon the ground that the affidavit was imperfect by reason of the omission of that, averment.

Mr. Jones, for defendant,

contended that that averment is only matter of form, and that it is to be inferred from the facts stated.

Mr. Swann, on the same side, stated that it was by his inadvertence that the averment was omitted.

The defendant, being in court, offered an additional affidavit containing the averment.

Mr. Key objected that it was too late; that supplemental affidavits were dangerous, &c.

Mr. Jones contended that it was' not too late, as the court had not given its opinion that the affidavit was insufficient.

THE COt’ItT

(.CRANCH. Chief Judge, contra)

refused to continue the cause, because

the affidavit, without such an averment, was insufficient: and said they would not receive a supplemental affidavit, after the original affidavit had been laid before the court, and the defect has been pointed out. by the opposite counsel: on account of the strong temptation it would hold out for perjury.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.1

                         INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' CONSENT

The Board of Directors
Mesa Air Group, Inc.:

We consent to incorporation by reference, in the Registration Statements (Nos.
333-09395 and 333-02791) on Form S-8 of Mesa Air Group, Inc. of our report dated
January 7, 1999, relating to the consolidated balance sheets of Mesa Air Group,
Inc. and subsidiaries as of September 30, 1998 and 1997, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, cash flows and stockholders' equity for
each of the years in the three-year period ended September 30, 1998, which
report appears in the September 30, 1998 annual report on Form 10-K of Mesa Air
Group, Inc.

Phoenix, Arizona
January 8, 1999
No. 51903.

#### F. W. Myers & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 115250-K, etc. (Ogdensburg, etc.).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
IN THE UNITED ST A TES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

STANFORD GLABERSON, et al. 

V. 

COMCAST CORPORATION, et al. 

CIVIL ACTION 

FILED 

PEC - 3 2015 

NO. 03-6604 ~CMAiL.(i,KUN~,Oltel'k 

.,, __ ..,.oep.Clork 

ORDER 

~ 

AND NOW, thisj day of December, 2015, upon consideration of Plaintiffs' Motion for 

Appeal Bond (Docket Entry 645), and all responses and replies thereto, IT IS HEREBY 

ORDERED that the Motion is GRANTED. 

Objector Mark L. Rhoades is ORDERED to post an appeal bond, pursuant to Federal 

Rule of Appellate Procedure 7, in the amount of $28,150.00 within ten (10) days of the entry of 

this Order. Objector Mark L. Rhoades is FURTHER ORDERED to file with the Court and 

serve on Plaintiffs' counsel either proof of satisfaction of the bond requirement or proof of 

withdrawal of his notice of appeal. 

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion to File Reply Brief (Docket Entry 

651) is GRANTED. 

BY THE COURT: 

/ 

a.P:~!!~ 

Case 2:03-cv-06604-JP Document 653 Filed 12/03/15 Page 1 of 1
, 

### THEATTORNEY GENERAL TEXAS

AUSTIN. %%XAS 78711 

### CWAWYORDc.

lMARTlN A-rrORNEY QENxmz*x. February2,1972

Honorable Robert J, Seerden OpinionNo, M-1064 Criminal DistrictAttorney Victoria County Courts BldgL Re- Whether theTexas Victoria, Texas 77901 Election Code, Section 5Oc, requires the district clerk to report to the registrarof voters felony convictions resulting in probated Deer Mr, Seerden: sentences: You have requested the opinion of this officewhether Subdivision 3 of Section 5Oc of the Texas Election Code requires that the district clerk report to the registrar of voters felony convictions inwhich the accused receivesa probated sentence, Section 58~ is a temporaryprovision enactedby the 62nd Legislature (Acts 62nd Leg:cR,S, 1971, ch, 827,p: 2509, 2519) and will become a permanent amendment of the Texas Election Code upon the occyrrence of events outlined in Section 23 of the amend**atory** act (noneof which are related to this opinion), Section 5Oc is codified as Vernon's Election Code, Article 5:18c, This office has previously concluded that a person who has been found guilty of a felony offense and given a probated sentence has been convicted, Attorney General"sOpinionNo, H-640 (1970): Such a person is prohibited fromvoting by Vernon"s Election Codej Article 5,01, until the probated sentence is set aside as authorizedby Article 42,12, Section aiVernon's Code of Criminah Procedure. Attorney General's OpinionNo; M-795 (1971):

**1** Note that Subdivision 4 of Section 58c states that the requirementsof Subdivision 3 apply only to those felony **convic** tionswhich occur on or after October 1, 1972,

-5201-Honorable Robert J, Seerden,, page 2 (M-1064)

The obvious _-” ~ _ purpose of Section

. I 5Oc is to require the proper officials to report to tne registrar of voters all deaths, judgments of mental incompetency,and felony convictions so that the registrar can remove unqualifiedvoters from the list of registered voters, Since a person convicted of a felony and serving a probatni sentence 1s ,ineligible to vote0 our opinion is that the languageof Subdivision 3 of Section 5Oc requiring that ", D c the clerk of each court having jurisdictionof the trial of felony crimes shall furnish to the registrar an abstractof each unappealed conviction for a felony crime and of each final conviction in appealed cases 0 0 0R includes those convictions inwhich probation is assessed., CONCLUSION

BeginningOctober 1, 1972, the district clerk is required by Article 5Oc,Texas Election Code, to report to the registrar of voters those~felonyconvictions inwhich probated sentencesare assessed, as well as other felony convictions,unless this requirement expires as provided inActs 62nd Leg,, R,S. 1971, ch, 827,pe 2509, 8 very truly, /

Prepared by Roland DanielGreen, III Assistant Attorney General APPROVED: OPINION COMMITTEE Kerns Taylor, Chairman W.E, Allen, Co-Chairman Ben Harrlson Howard Fender James Quick Sam Jones

-5202-Honorable Robert J, Seerden,page 3

SAM MC DANIEL Staff Legal Assistant ALFRED WALKER ExecutiveAssistant NOLA WHITE FirstAssistant (M-1064)

-5203-
(Reap. Dec. 10933)

#### Elof Hansson, Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 846453-1/2, etc.

*586(Decided March 24, 1965)

*Sharp & Hogan,*for the plaintiff.

*John*TV. *Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Rao, Judge:

The appeals for rea] >praisement listed in schedule A, annexed to this decision and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipul ation:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND .{.GREED by the undersigned, subject to the approval of the Court:

> 1. That the subject merchandise consists of hardboard exported from Sweden as to which the Secretary of the Treasury issued a finding of dumping, published in 89 TD 197, TD 53567, made pursuant to 'the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C., 160, etseq.).

> 2. That pursuant to Section 168 of said Antidumping Act, the appraiser reported the purchase price (Sec. 162) and the foreign market value (Sec. 164) as to the merchandise listed on Schedule A attached hereto and made a part hereof.

> 3. That pursuant to Sections 500 and 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, the appraiser appraised all of the merchandise in the appeals for appraisement enumerated on Schedule A for regular duty purposes.

> 4. That 'the plaintiff duly filed appeals for reappraisement as to the values referred to in the above paragraphs Nos. 2 and 3.

> 5. That at the times relevant herein the purchase price and the foreign market value under the said Antidumping Act are as specified in the aforesaid Schedule A attached hereto.

> 6. That as to all other items of merchandise not identified on Schedule A, the appraiser’s reports of purchase price and of foreign market value are correct.

> 7. That the appraiser’s findings of value under the provisions of Section 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, are correct.

> 8.That said appeals are submitted for decision upon this stipulation and said Schedule A.

Upon the agreed facts, I find foreign market value, as defined in section 164 of the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C. § 164), for the merchandise described in said schedule A, and the purchase price thereof, within section 162 of said act (19 U.S.C. § 162), to be as indicated in said schedule. As to all other items of merchandise not identified in schedule A, I find the foreign market values and purchase prices to be as reported by the appraiser. In all other respects, the values of all merchandise are as returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Exhibit 32.2**CERTIFICATION**PURSUANT TO THE REQUIREMENT SET FORTH IN RULE 13A-14(b) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934, ASAMENDED, AND SECTION 1350 OF CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18 OF THE UNITED STATES CODE (18 U.S.C. SECTION1350), MICHAEL D. PERRY, SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER OF VITRIA TECHNOLOGY,INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION (THE “COMPANY”) HEREBY CERTIFIES THAT, TO THE BEST OF HIS KNOWLEDGE,AS FOLLOWS:          The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2006, to which thisCertification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the “PERIODIC REPORT”), fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that theinformation contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.          IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of this 9th day of August,2006.       /s/ Michael D. Perry    Michael D. Perry    Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer     A signed original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United StatesCode (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), has been provided to Vitria Technology, Inc. and will be retained byVitria Technology, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff uponrequest. This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed withthe Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filingof Vitria Technology, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities ExchangeAct of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective ofany general incorporation language contained in such filing.
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 66 Filed 08/14/2009 Page 1 of 10
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 66 Filed 08/14/2009 Page 2 of 10
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 66 Filed 08/14/2009 Page 3 of 10
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 66 Filed 08/14/2009 Page 4 of 10
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 66 Filed 08/14/2009 Page 5 of 10
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 66 Filed 08/14/2009 Page 6 of 10
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 66 Filed 08/14/2009 Page 7 of 10
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 66 Filed 08/14/2009 Page 8 of 10
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 66 Filed 08/14/2009 Page 9 of 10
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 66 Filed 08/14/2009 Page 10 of 10
| 1.  | the      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                     |
|----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|     |                                                                                                                                                                |
| 2.       | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company. |

| April      15, 2008 |   | /s/      Niv Krikov——————————————Niv      KrikovTreasurer,      Chief Financial Officerand      Principal Accounting Officer |
|---------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
No. 54523.

#### Railway Express Agency, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 146518-K (El Paso).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.
"'-)~,,'\, 

LVl>J 

ALTITUDE MEDIA 

U.S. Department of Transportation 

Docket Management System 

1200 New Jersey Ave. SE 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Amendment Request Section 333 Exemption No.12517 

Dear Sir/Madam, 

:_; 

December 1, 2015 

Please accept this as formal petition to amend SKYLVL, LLC's (hereinafter petitioner or operator) 

section 333 exemption number 12517 to add the following Suas: 

1) DJIInspire 1 12) DJI Phantom 313) 3DR Solo 4) SenseFiy ebee 15) PrecisionHawk HawkEye 

Lancaster 

This petition is being submitted on our own behalf without legal counsel or consulting services. 

The FAA previously determined the airworthiness of the DJIInspire 1 in Exemption No. 11295 

(RoboFiight Systems LLC). The FAA previously determined the airworthiness of the DJI 

Phantom 3 in Exemption No. 12997 (New England Studio LLC). The FAA previously 

determined the airworthiness of the 3DR Solo in Exemption No. 11832 (AUV, LLC). The FAA 

previously determined the airworthiness of the Precision Hawk HawkEye Lancaster in 

Exemption No. 11273 (AIG PC Global Services, Inc.). The FAA previously determined the 

airworthiness of the Sensfly ebee in Exemption No. 11263 (SensFiy Ltd.). 

All operations of the additional UAS will be in full compliance with the terms of our current FAA 

Exemption No. 12517. Since the requested amendment to SKYLVL, LLC would not set any 

precedent or raise any novel issue, and pecause petitioner seeks to begin these operations 

without delay, SKYLVL, LLC respectfully requests the FAA to determine that good cause exists to 

grant the requested amendment expeditiously by summary means. 

Based on the foregoing, Petitioner hereby requests that the FAA grant this petition and provide 

such further relief as deemed appropriate for the operations proposed herein. 

Please let me know if you require additional information in support of this petition. 

Sincerely, 

W.Ro-wCA-~ 

W. Ross Cromartie 

Director of Operations 

SKYLVL, LLC 

1712 Mary Street 

Dallas, TX, 75206
No. 62979.

#### Eberling & Reuss Co. *v.*United States,

protests 262041-K, etc. (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of figures similar in all material respects to those passed upon in *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.*v. *United States*(39 C.C.P.A. 15, C.A.D. 458), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.