UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

________________ _________________ JASON ARON PRESLEY, a/k/a Ernest John Young, Plaintiff - Appellant,

v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION; STATE OF UTAH; STATE OF TENNESSEE; ELVIS PRESLEY; DEBRA PAGET; PRESCILLA PRESLEY; LISA PRESLEY; VERNON PRESLEY; J OE ESPOSITO; BILL BRADLEY, SR.; BILL BRADLEY, JR.; RICK STANLEY; BOYD MORTENSEN; BOYD BUNNELL; SCOTT JOHANSEN; SAMUEL ALBA; ROBERT J. SHELBY; BRUCE S. JENKINS; CLARK WADDOUPS; DICK DIBBLE; TIM HANSEN; GENERAL MOTORS; CHRISTINA RICHARD; ABBOTT CHEMICK; WESTERN STATES; ATHERTON PARK; DANA PEYTON; ROY PEYTON; VALINCIA MORRIS; MOUNTAIN COURTYARD SUITES; JULIE LOSEY; INN TOWN SUITES; UTAH MEDICAID; UNIVERSITY OF UTAH HOSPITAL; JOHN CHAMBERS; DAVID SMOTKIN; DANNY KEHOUGH; PRICE POLICE; CHUCK JENKEN, Carbon Sheriff; RICK ADAMS; UTAH DEFS; TOM PARSON, Defendants - Appellees. No. 19-4132 (D.C. No. 2:19- CV-00398-HCN) (D. Utah)

________________ _________________ FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### November 5, 2019

Elisabeth A. Shumaker Clerk of Court2 ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

________________ _________________ Before CARSON , BALDOCK , and MURPHY , Circuit Judges.

________________ _________________ Plaintiff-Appellant Jason Aron Pr esley, also known as Ernest Jo hn Young, filed a pro se complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Utah in June 2019. The complaint appears to a llege several grievances again st approximately 44 defendants, including the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) , the States of Utah and Tennessee, and Elvis Presley. In his complaint, Plaintiff alle ges this is a “capital case of domestic violence by Vernon Pr esley who murdered Mallissa [s ic] and Gladys Presley.” In June 2019, the dis trict court granted Plaintiff’s application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) and waived the prepaymen t of filing fees pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. In July 2019, the magistrate judge issued a Report and Recommendation, which recommended the complaint be dismissed fo r failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e )(2)(B)(ii). Later that month, the district court overruled Plaintiff’s objection to the magistrate judge’s recom mendation, adopted the recommendation in its entirety , and dismissed the action with p rejudice. Plaintiff now appeals the final judgment, ge nerally asserting t he same rambling allegations concerning, inter alia , a murder on Graceland property involving Vernon Presley (Elvis’s father), the k idnapping of Plaintiff’s childre n by Lisa Marie Presley

* This order and judgment is not binding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicat a, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consistent with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 1 0th Cir. R. 32.1.3 (Elvis’s only child), and attempts by the FBI and courts to kee p this “capital case of

domestic violence” a secret. In a well-reasoned Report and Rec ommendation, which the district court wholly adopted , the magistrate judge compete ntly explained why Plaintiff’s incredible allegati ons—even under a liberal interpr etation—fail to plausibly support any viable legal claim f or relief. For the purpose of resolving this appeal, we have thoroughly reviewed the di strict court record and Plaintif f’s appellate brief, and

we discern no reversible error. Where the district court accur ately analyzes an issue, we see no useful purpose in writi ng at length. Therefore, exer cising jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, we AFFIRM for substantially the same seasons set forth in the

district court’s order dismis sing Plaintiff’s complaint.

Entered for the Court

Bobby R. Baldock Circuit Judge