alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.4

CIT EQUIPMENT COLLATERAL 2005-EF1

ANNUAL STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

The undersigned
certifies that he is an Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer of
The CIT Group/Equipment Financing, Inc., a corporation organized under the laws
of Delaware (CITEF), and that as such he is duly authorized to execute and
deliver this certificate on behalf of CITEF in connection with a Pooling and
Servicing Agreement dated as of July 1, 2005, among CIT Equipment Collateral
2005-EF1, as Issuer, CIT Funding Company, LLC, as Depositor, CIT Financial USA,
Inc., in its individual capacity, and CITEF, as Servicer (the Agreement). All
capitalized terms used herein without definition having the respective meanings
specified in the Agreement. The undersigned further certifies to the Trustees
and each of the Rating Agencies that a review of the activities of CITEF during
the 2005 calendar year and of its performance under the Agreement has been made
under his supervision and to the best of his knowledge, based on such review,
(a) CITEF has, in all material respects, fulfilled its obligations under the
Agreement during the 2005 calendar year and (b) no Servicer Default has
occurred or is continuing.

DATED: March
15, 2006

| |                                                           |                                                       
| | --------------------------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------------------
| | THE CIT
  GROUP/ EQUIPMENT FINANCING, INC., as
  Servicer
| |                                                           |                                                       
| | /s/
  Thomas E. Magrath                                  
| |                                                          
| | Name:                                                     | Thomas E.
  Magrath                                   
| | Title:                                                    | Executive
  Vice President
   and Chief Credit Officer

---
No. 55142.

#### R. H. Macy & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 131386-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protest was dismissed.
No. 53423.

protest 136886-K/1422 (Chicago).

#### J. E. Bernard & Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

*140Opinion by

Cole, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise in question is-the same in all material respects as the estrogenic hormone passed upon in Abstract 52793, which case followed *Roche-Organon*v. *United States*(35 C. C. P. A. 99, C. A. D. 378). The claim at 10 percent under paragraph 34 was therefore sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1997
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1997
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1997
<CASH>                                           3,300
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   68,778
<ALLOWANCES>                                     5,485
<INVENTORY>                                     62,808
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               139,012
<PP&E>                                       1,250,461
<DEPRECIATION>                                 367,386
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               1,555,721
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          175,724
<BONDS>                                      1,579,416
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         1,026
<OTHER-SE>                                   (200,445)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 1,555,721
<SALES>                                          5,011
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               225,248
<CGS>                                           31,357
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                  196,679
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                37,126
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                 4,163
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              37,579
<INCOME-PRETAX>                               (39,914)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                           (39,914)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                  (39,914)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (0.39)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.39)
        

</TABLE>
No. 51887.

#### New York Merchandise Co., Inc., et al *v.*United States,

protests 626318-G, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J,

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). The claim at 50 percent ad valorem under paragraph 915, plus any additional duty applicable under paragraph 924, was therefore sustained.
EXHIBIT 31.1 - SECTION 302 CERTIFICATION

                             CERTIFICATION

I, Kenneth A. McCullum, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this report on Form 10-K and all reports on Form
     8-K required to be filed in respect of the period covered by this
     report on Form 10-K of Hartford Life Global Funding Trust 2005-101
     (the "Exchange Act periodic reports");

2.   Based on my knowledge, the Exchange Act periodic reports, taken as a
     whole, do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit
     to state a material fact necessary in order to make the statements
     made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were
     made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.   Based on my knowledge, all of the distribution, servicing and other
     information required to be provided under Form 8-K for the period
     covered by this report is included in the Exchange Act periodic
     reports;

4.   Based on my knowledge and the servicer compliance statement required
     in this report under Item 1123 of Regulation AB, and except as
     disclosed in the Exchange Act periodic reports, the servicer has
     fulfilled its obligations under the servicing agreement in all material
     respects;

5.   All of the reports on assessment of compliance with servicing criteria
     for asset-backed securities and their related attestation reports on
     assessment of compliance with servicing criteria for asset-backed
     securities required to be included in this report in accordance with
     Item 1122 of Regulation AB and Exchange Act Rule 13a-18 and 15d-18 have
     been included as an exhibit to this report, except as otherwise
     disclosed in this report. Any material instances of noncompliance
     described in such reports have been disclosed in this report on Form
     10-K.

In giving the certification above, I have reasonably relied on information
provided to me by the following unaffiliated parties:

            JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and its officers and agents

Date:  August 29, 2006


/s/ Kenneth A. McCullum


Kenneth A. McCullum
Senior Vice President & Actuary
Hartford Life Insurance Company, as depositor
Case 2:04-cv-00735-JF Document 1 Filed 02/20/2004 Page 1 of 12
Case 2:04-cv-00735-JF Document 1 Filed 02/20/2004 Page 2 of 12
Case 2:04-cv-00735-JF Document 1 Filed 02/20/2004 Page 3 of 12
Case 2:04-cv-00735-JF Document 1 Filed 02/20/2004 Page 4 of 12
Case 2:04-cv-00735-JF Document 1 Filed 02/20/2004 Page 5 of 12
Case 2:04-cv-00735-JF Document 1 Filed 02/20/2004 Page 6 of 12
Case 2:04-cv-00735-JF Document 1 Filed 02/20/2004 Page 7 of 12
Case 2:04-cv-00735-JF Document 1 Filed 02/20/2004 Page 8 of 12
Case 2:04-cv-00735-JF Document 1 Filed 02/20/2004 Page 9 of 12
Case 2:04-cv-00735-JF Document 1 Filed 02/20/2004 Page 10 of 12
Case 2:04-cv-00735-JF Document 1 Filed 02/20/2004 Page 11 of 12
Case 2:04-cv-00735-JF Document 1 Filed 02/20/2004 Page 12 of 12
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          JUN-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                               0
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                       9,556,000
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                 40,978,000
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                              0
<ALLOWANCE>                                  2,902,000
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             378,545,000
<DEPOSITS>                                 212,905,000
<SHORT-TERM>                               129,641,000
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                          4,925,000
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        40,000
<OTHER-SE>                                  30,810,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>             378,545,000
<INTEREST-LOAN>                             22,734,000
<INTEREST-INVEST>                            2,238,000
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                     0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                            25,072,000
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                           7,546,000
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          12,094,000
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                       12,978,000
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                2,330,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                              3,889,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              8,204,000
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                   8,204,000
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                 5,391,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       1.38
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     1.38
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.01
<LOANS-NON>                                  2,411,000
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                             1,523,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                  951,000
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                            2,902,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                 0
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                      2,902,000


</TABLE>
No. 59425.

protest 227217-K (New York).

#### Mamiye & Hidary *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of silk scarves or squares similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *The Specialty House, Inc., Bryant & Heffernan, Inc., et al.*(42 C. C. P. A. 136, C. A. D. 585), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

GREGORY C. BONTEMPS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

 v.

NEVES; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

No. 15-17176

D.C. No. 2:12-cv-02185-TLN-AC

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of California

Troy L. Nunley, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 14, 2017**

Before: GOODWIN, FARRIS, and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.

Gregory C. Bontemps, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the 

district court’s summary judgment for failure to exhaust administrative remedies in 

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging excessive force and retaliation. We have 

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Williams v. Paramo, 

 

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent 

except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision 

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

FILED

FEB 23 2017

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 15-17176 

775 F.3d 1182, 1191 (9th Cir. 2015). We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment because Bontemps 

failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether he exhausted his 

administrative remedies as required under the Prison Litigation Reform Act 

(“PLRA”), or whether administrative remedies were effectively unavailable. See 

Ross v. Blake, 136 S. Ct. 1850, 1858-60 (2016) (exhaustion not required when 

administrative remedy is unavailable); Woodford v. Ngo, 548 U.S. 81, 90 (2006) 

(“[P]roper exhaustion of administrative remedies . . . means using all steps that the 

agency holds out, and doing so properly (so that the agency addresses the issues on 

the merits).” (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)).

Bontemps’s request for appointment of counsel, attached to the opening 

brief, is denied.

AFFIRMED.
CERTIFICATION
 
 I, Kyleen E. Cane, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Legal Access Technologies, Inc.
 (the "Registrant"), certify that:
 
 (1) I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form10-QSB of Legal Access Technologies, Inc.;
 
 (2) Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
 
 (3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
 
 (4) I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
 
 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision,
 to ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
 within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
 
 b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuers disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
 the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
 
 c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small business
 issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuers fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
 reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and
 
 (5) I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of the internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit committee of small business issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
 
 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
 likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
 
 b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers
 internal control over financial reporting.
 
 
 Date: March 22, 2004   /s/ Kyleen E. Cane
 Kyleen E. Cane
 President, Chief Executive and
 Financial Officer (Principal Executive and Financial Officer)
  1
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK

Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

962 

CA 12-00484 

PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND MARTOCHE, JJ. 

 

THOMAS D. POLISOTO, M.D., AS ADMINISTRATOR OF 

THE ESTATE OF ROSEANN POLISOTO, DECEASED, 

PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, 

V ORDER

JAMES S. COLLINS, JR., M.D., ET AL., DEFENDANTS, 

AND JULIA CULLIGAN, PH.D., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

 

PHELAN, PHELAN & DANEK, LLP, ALBANY (SYMA S. AZAM OF COUNSEL), FOR

DEFENDANT-APPELLANT. 

LIPSITZ GREEN SCIME CAMBRIA LLP, BUFFALO (JOHN A. COLLINS OF COUNSEL),

FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT. 

 

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Donna M.

Siwek, J.), entered August 9, 2011. The order, insofar as appealed

from, denied the motion of defendant Julia Culligan, Ph.D. for summary

judgment. 

Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of withdrawal signed

by the attorneys for the parties on October 11 and 16, 2012, 

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed

without costs upon stipulation. 

Entered: November 16, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell

Clerk of the Court
H. Res. 682 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 10, 2018. 

Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall 

be in order to consider in the House the bill (S. 139) to implement the use of Rapid DNA instruments to inform decisions about pretrial release or detention and their conditions, 

to solve and prevent violent crimes and other crimes, to exonerate the innocent, to prevent DNA analysis backlogs, and for 

other purposes. All points of order against consideration of 

the bill are waived. An amendment in the nature of a substitute consisting of the text of Rules Committee Print 115– 

53 shall be considered as adopted. The bill, as amended, shall 

be considered as read. All points of order against provisions 

in the bill, as amended, are waived. The previous question 

shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, and 

on any further amendment thereto, to final passage without 

intervening motion except: (1) one hour of debate, with 40 

minutes equally divided and controlled by the chair and ranking minority member of the Permanent Select Committee on 

Intelligence and 20 minutes equally divided and controlled by 
2 

•HRES 682 EH 

the chair and ranking minority member of the Committee on 

the Judiciary; (2) the further amendment printed in the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution, 

if offered by the Member designated in the report, which shall 

be in order without intervention of any point of order, shall 

be considered as read, shall be separately debatable for the 

time specified in the report equally divided and controlled by 

the proponent and an opponent, and shall not be subject to 

a demand for division of the question; and (3) one motion to 

commit with or without instructions. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
No. P68/172.

protest 63/15506-13742 (Chicago).

#### Judson Sheldon International Corp. *v.*United States,

Beckwortii, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of hand-operated bicycle air pumps similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Victoria Distributors, Inc.*v. *United States*(56 Cust. Ct. 284, C.D. 2639), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
for information and record —

purposes and is no: to be referer.c

in any publication.

NATIONAL BUREAU OF

NBS PROJECT

1002-12-10421 Oay 1,

Eleventh

Report

on the

Mechanisms of Fire Ignition and Extinguishment

by

E , G. Creitz

Covering the period 1 February to 3° April 1 962

for

Bureau of Shins

Department of the : avy

Code 63'3

STANDARDS REPORT

NBS REPORT

1962 7495

Progress

NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANI

intended for use within the Gov

to additional evaluation and revii listing of this Report, either in v

the Office of the Director, Natior however, by the Government agt

to reproduce additional copies ft

IMPORTANT NOTICE

Approved for public release by the

Director of the National Institute of

Standards and Technology (NIST) on October 9, 2015.

ress accounting documents

lly published it is subjected

roduction, or open-literature

is obtained in writing from

:h permission is not needed,

pared if that agency wishes

<NBS>

U. S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS

Eleventh Progress Report

Mechanisms of Fire Ignittha. and Extinguishment

by

E. Co Creitz

Covering the period 1 February to 30 April 1962

1. Summary

The activities on the project were confined to

developments on the mass spectrometer for sampling and

identification of ions in flames.

2. The Mass Spectrometer

In designing the mass spectrometer, it had been reasoned

that the ion accelerating voltage would be required to be of

saw-tooth wave form, having a rapid decay time, since the

resolution of the instrument depended on the slope of the

rise-time of the wave. Design of a saw-tooth generator

having good linearity and large slope in the wave form and,

at the same time, having sufficient power to supply the load

presented by the drift tube capacitances proved somewhat of

a chore. Furthermore, it was possible for ions to remain in

the drift tube for an integral number of accelerator voltage

cycles and appear as a "harmonic" mass at the detector. It

was evident, however, that the higher "harmonics" gave better

resolution than the fundamental. During the quarter, mathematical analysis indicated that an accelerating voltage

having sine, rather than saw-tooth form would provide greater

resolution because the absolute value of the average slope

of a sine wave is just double that of a saw-tooth wave of the

same period. It would have the further advantage that two

sine waves could be combined in such a way as to produce an

accelerating voltage which would eliminate unwanted

"harmonics." A trial of sine wave accelerating voltages

indicated the mathematical analysis to be correct. The

"harmonic" selector was designed and constructed, and is

almost ready for trial. A new high-voltage d.c. supply was

obtained to permit the study of negative, as well as positive

ions, and C1 J ^ and Ci J negative ions have been added to the

list of ions detected.

During the next quarter, it is hoped that the "harmonic"

selector will be functioning and that work can be started on

the determination of the electron capture process associated

with certain flame inhibitors.

USCOMM-NBS-DC
Before the Third Division,

November 5, 1953

No. 57594.

#### Morgan Cigar Company, Inc. v. United States,

protest 138237-K (Tampa).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of tobacco stems and other tobacco waste and that the facts and issues relating to the refund of duty on such merchandise are the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Henry Clay and Bock & Co., Ltd.*v. *United States*(41 C. C. P. A. 45, C. A. D. 527). In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on authority of the decision cited, it was held that refund should be made on the involved merchandise at the rates and in the amounts applicable, as computed by the collector.