alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Quý Vị Không Thể Thanh Toán Khoản 

Vay Thế Chấp?

Nhận trợ giúp ngay!

Đôi khi cuộc sống có những sự kiện không lường trước có thể ảnh hưởng 

đến tình hình tài chính của quý vị. Nếu quý vị gặp phải khó khăn tài chính 

và trở ngại trong việc thanh toán khoản vay thế chấp, chúng tôi luôn sẵn 

sàng trợ giúp quý vị. 

■ Hãy gọi cho chúng tôi. Chúng ta có thể thảo luận nhiều lựa chọn giúp 

quý vị giữ được nhà, bao gồm cả việc sửa đổi theo chương trình Sửa 

Đổi Nhà Giá Phải Chăng của liên bang. Hoặc nếu quý vị không còn khả 

năng giữ được nhà, chúng ta có thể thảo luận các lựa chọn thay thế

cho việc tịch thu tài sản thế chấp để giúp quý vị từ bỏ ngôi nhà và ổn 

định hơn về mặt tài chính.

■ Liên hệ với cố vấn viên về nhà cửa phi lợi nhuận. Cố vấn viên về

nhà cửa có thể giúp quý vị sắp xếp kế hoạch chi tiêu để thanh toán khoản

vay thế chấp và các chi phí hàng tháng khác—mà không cần chúng tôi

trực tiếp tham gia ban đầu. Các chuyên gia này cũng có thể giúp quý vị

tìm kiếm và tận dụng dịch vụ hoặc chương trình hỗ trợ về mặt tài chính và

pháp lý tại địa phương. Để tìm cơ quan tư vấn nhà ở được Bộ Phát Triển

Đô Thị và Nhà Ở Hoa Kỳ (HUD – U.S Department of Housing and Urban

Development) chứng nhận, truy cập www.hud.gov (tiếng Anh).

Place your logo and contact 

information here. 

—
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MIDDLE DISTRICT

IN RE: ADOPTION OF I.A.I.R.

PETITION OF: H.R., FATHER

:

:

:

:

:

No. 116 MAL 2019

Petition for Allowance of Appeal from 

the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 1st day of April, 2019, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is 

DENIED.
EXHIBIT 99.5

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS

We hereby consent to the use of our name in the Annual Report on Form 40-F (the "Annual Report") of Enerplus
Resources Fund (the "Registrant"). We hereby further consent to the inclusion in the Annual Report of the Registrant's Annual Information Form dated March 12, 2010 for the year ended
December 31, 2009, which document makes reference to our firm and our report dated February 12, 2010, evaluating the Registrant's oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids interests
effective December 31, 2009.

Calgary, Alberta, Canada
March 12, 2010

MCDANIEL & ASSOCIATES CONSULTANTS LIMITED/s/ P.A. WELCH P.A. Welch, P. Eng.
President & Managing Director


---



QuickLinks
---

EXHIBIT 32.2

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Melanie Farrand, the Principal Financial Officer of Shoshone
Silver Mining Company (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company, for the
      fiscal year ended September 30, 2009, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) oar 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                       



| | By:    | /s/ Melanie Farrand                            
| | ------ | -----------------------------------------------
| |        |                                                
| | Name:  | Melanie Farrand                                
| | Title: | Treasurer and Principal Financial
      Officer
| | Date:  | January 11, 2010                               



A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
# C_2015354EN.01004002.xml

| 26.10.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 354/40 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.10.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 354/40

---

Action brought on 27 August 2015 — Sociedad agraria de transformación no 9982 Montecitrus v OHIM — Spanish Oranges (MOUNTAIN CITRUS SPAIN)

o

(Case T-495/15)

(2015/C 354/49)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Sociedad agraria de transformación no 9982 Montecitrus (Pulpí, Spain) (represented by: N. Fernández Fernández-Pacheco, lawyer)

Applicant:

o

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Spanish Oranges, SL (Castellón, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Applicant of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word elements ‘MOUNTAIN CITRUS SPAIN’ — Application for registration No 11 290 293

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before OHIM

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 26 June 2015 in Case R 871/2014-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | set aside the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

set aside the contested decision;

| — | refuse the application of the trademark at issue for all goods covered in classes 29 and 31; |
| --- | --- |

—

refuse the application of the trademark at issue for all goods covered in classes 29 and 31;

| — | order the Intervener to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Intervener to pay the costs.

Plea(s) in law

Plea(s) in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
No. 50332.

#### Protest 63354-K of Arthur H. Lee & Sons, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the ease within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83, decided February 5, 1945.) In, accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoice should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on the entry. The protest was sustained to this extent.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-1468

FAITH D. BELLAMY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

UNIFORMED SERVICES UNIVERSITY OF THE HEALTH

SCIENCES; U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE; WILLIAM

PERRY; UNIFORMED SERVICES UNIVERSITY OF THE

HEALTH SCIENCES, Medical School,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge.

(CA-94-3242-JFM, CA-95-1184-JFM, CA-95-2305-JFM)

Submitted: November 7, 1996 Decided: November 18, 1996

Before RUSSELL and WIDENER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Faith Bellamy, Appellant Pro Se. George Levi Russell III, OFFICE

OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying her

motion for reconsideration, under Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b), of the

order dismissing her employment discrimination action. We have

reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. Bellamy v. Uniformed Servs. Univ. of the Health

Sciences, Nos. CA-94-3242-JFM; CA-95-1184-JFM; CA-95-2305-JFM (D.

Md. Feb. 28, 1996). We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
PLAINTIFF

VS.

DEFENDANT

CIVIL ACTION NO.

DOCUMENT FILED UNDER SEAL

Case 2:04-cv-00955-LS Document 218 Filed 07/29/2009 Page 1 of 1
CERTIFICATIONS



I, J. Paul Sorbara, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Golden Goliath Resources Ltd.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)

disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  March 14, 2008

|                                   |  |                     
|---------------------------------- |  | --------------------
|By:                                |  | /s/  J. Paul Sorbara
|                                   |  |                     
|J. Paul Sorbara,
President and CEO
----

|   | I, George M. Hare, Chief Financial and Principal Accounting Officer of Innotrac Corporation (the “Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 as adopted by § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:       |
|--------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
| (1)    | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months ended March 31, 2011  (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
| (2)    | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.                                                                                        |

|   | Dated:  May 16, 2011                                       |   |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   |                                                                 |   |
|   | /s/ George M. Hare                                                   |   |
|   | George M. HareChief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) |
### NUMBER 13
- 11 - 00 567
- CR 

## COURT OF APPEALS
THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
CORPUS CHRISTI
- EDINBURG

____________________________________________________________ ANTHONY SPENCER , Appellant,

v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee.

____________________________________________________________

On A ppeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

of Nueces County, Texas.

____________________________________________________________



## MEMORANDUM OPINION
Before Chief Justice Valdez and Justices Garza and Vela

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam
Appellant, Anthony Spencer , pro se, filed a notice of appeal on August 23, 2011,
and September 1, 2011 , from an order granting the State’s application for a writ of procedendo on April 29, 20 11. On September 8 , 20 11 , the Clerk of this Court notified appellant that it appeared that the order from which the appeal was taken was not an2

appealable order, that the appeal had not been timely perfected, and requested
correction of th ese defect s with in ten days or the appeal would be dismissed. Appellant responded that the appeal is timely and that the w rit of p rocedendo was a final judgment. A defendant may appeal to a court of appeals if he is convicted in a municipal court
of record only if “the fine assessed against the defendant [in municipal court] exceeds $100 and if the judgment is affirmed” by the county court. T EX

. G OV ’ T C ODE A NN

. § 30.00027(a) (Vernon 2004). In this case the order of the county court was that the appeal be a bated, dismissed, and remanded to the municipal court. It, therefore, appears that because the judgment was not affirmed by the trial court, this Court does not have jurisdiction to hear the appeal as the statutory requirements of Section 30.00027(a)
of t he Texas Government Code have not been satisfied.
The Court is of the opinion that there is not an appealable order and this Court lacks jurisdiction over the matters herein. Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction

.

PER CURIAM Do not publish. See T EX

. R. A PP

. P . 47.2(b).
D elivered and filed the 29th day of December , 2011.
S02A0691.

#### THE STATE v. PITTMON.

(562 SE2d 185)

Decided April 15, 2002.

*Gerald N. Blaney, Jr., Solicitor-General, Gary S. Vey, Assistant Solicitor-General,*for appellant.

*W. Keith Davidson, Wystan B. Getz,*for appellee.

Benham, Justice.

Larry Kent Pittmon was charged with violating OCGA § 40-6-391 (a) (2), driving under the influence of drugs to the extent it was less safe for him to drive. Citing this Court’s decision in *Love v. State,*271 Ga. 398 (517 SE2d 53) (1999), Pittmon filed a general demurrer to the accusation, seeking to quash the charge on the ground that the statute violated the equal protection clauses of the United States and Georgia Constitutions. The trial court found the demurrer to be proper and granted it, effectively dismissing the State’s accusation. The State, exercising its statutory right of appeal under OCGA § 5-7-1 (a) (1), filed a timely notice of appeal from the trial court’s ruling.

This case is identical, procedurally and substantively, to the recently-decided case of *State v. Kachwalla,*274 Ga. 886 (561 SE2d 403) (2002). In *Kachwalla,*we pointed out that our decision in *Love*was concerned only with the disparate treatment afforded those drivers charged with the per se violation found in OCGA § 40-6-391 (a) (6), and we upheld the constitutionality of OCGA § 40-6-391 (a) (2) against the charge it violated equal protection. For the reasons set forth in *Kachwalla,*the judgment of the trial court in the case at bar is reversed.

*Judgment reversed.*

*All the Justices concur.*
No. 60683.

#### Ellis K. Orlowitz Company et al. *v.*United States,

protests 190299-K, etc. (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of constitutent and integral parts of toilet-box assemblies the same in all material respects as those the subject of *The Durst Mfg. Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(36 Cust. Ct. 220, C. D. 1778), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

BRICKLAYERS AND ALLIED )

CRAFTWORKERS LOCAL 1 OF PA/DE; ) Civil Action

BRICKLAYERS AND ALLIED ) No. 02-CV-04079

CRAFTWORKERS LOCAL 1 OF PA/DE )

HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND; )

BRICKLAYERS AND ALLIED )

CRAFTWORKERS LOCAL 1 OF PA/DE )

JOINT APPRENTICESHIP AND )

TRAINING FUND; )

TILE LAYERS LOCAL 6 ANNUITY FUND;)

TMT TILE FINISHERS LOCAL 32 )

ANNUITY FUND; )

TILE LAYERS LOCAL 6 )

VACATION FUND; and )

TMT TILE FINISHERS LOCAL 32 )

VACATION FUND, )

 )

Plaintiffs )

 )

vs. )

 )

MASTRO MASONRY CONTRACTORS; )

ERNEST BOCK AND SONS, INC.; )

XL SPECIALTY INSURANCE COMPANY; )

and JOSEPH RUSSO, Individually )

and as President of Mastro )

Masonry Contractors, )

 )

Defendants )

ERNEST BOCK AND SONS, INC., )

 )

Cross Claimant )

 )

vs. )

 )

MASTRO MASONRY CONTRACTORS, )

 )

Cross Defendant )

O R D E R

NOW, this 23rd day of February, 2004, upon

consideration of the Order to Settle, Discontinue and End Limited

to Defendants Ernest Bock and Sons, Inc. and XL Specialty

Insurance Co. Only filed by plaintiff on February 23, 2004; it

Case 2:02-cv-04079-JKG Document 29 Filed 02/24/2004 Page 1 of 2
appearing by agreement of counsel that the issues between

plaintiffs and defendants Ernest Bock and Sons, Inc. and XL

Specialty Insurance Co. have been settled, and upon Order of the

court pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1(b) of the Rules of

Civil Procedure for the United States District Court for the

Eastern District of Pennsylvania effective July 1, 1995,

IT IS ORDERED that this action is dismissed with

prejudice, without costs.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 41.1(b) the

within dismissal Order “may be vacated, modified, or stricken

from the record, for cause shown, upon the application of any

party served within ninety (90) days of the entry of” the within

Order.

BY THE COURT:

 

James Knoll Gardner

United States District Judge

Case 2:02-cv-04079-JKG Document 29 Filed 02/24/2004 Page 2 of 2
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the annual report of World Gaming plc (the "Company") on Form
20-F for the year ended December 31, 2003 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, A. Daniel Moran, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.



/s/ A. Daniel Moran
___________________________
A. Daniel Moran
Chief Executive Officer
April 3, 2004
No. 58872.

protests 227073-K, etc. (Laredo).

#### Gebhardt Chili Powder Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of beef similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Swift & Company et al.*v. *United States*(33 Cust. Ct. 212, C. D. 1655), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.