alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 72-4 Filed 08/28/2009 Page 1 of 8
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 72-4 Filed 08/28/2009 Page 2 of 8
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 72-4 Filed 08/28/2009 Page 3 of 8
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 72-4 Filed 08/28/2009 Page 4 of 8
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 72-4 Filed 08/28/2009 Page 5 of 8
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 72-4 Filed 08/28/2009 Page 6 of 8
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 72-4 Filed 08/28/2009 Page 7 of 8
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 72-4 Filed 08/28/2009 Page 8 of 8
**Exhibit 13.1**

**AnnualCertification**

**Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Actof 2002**

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections(a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code), eachof the undersigned officers of Crucell N.V. (the “Company”), does herebycertify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

The Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2006 ofthe Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-Ffairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

Dated:   June 11,2007
|   | By:                            | /s/ Ronald H.P. Brus |   |
|--------|--------------------------------|----------------------|--------|
|   | Name: Ronald H.P. Brus         |
|   | Title: Chief Executive Officer |

 

 

Dated:  June 11, 2007
|   | By:                            | /s/ Leonard Kruimer |   |
|--------|--------------------------------|---------------------|--------|
|   | Name: Leonard Kruimer          |
|   | Title: Chief Financial Officer |

 

----
#### Begley, Appellant, *v.*Begley.

*Divorce*— Desertion—Separation *by consent*— Refusal *of decree.*

A libel in divorce on the ground of desertion is properly dismissed where the evidence established that the respondent had left libellant at his direct request, and that she was willing to return to him if he treated her kindly.

Submitted March 11, 1924.

Appeal, No. 295, Oct. T., 1923, by libellant, from decree of C. P. Schuylkill Co., Nov. T., 1922, No. 35, dismissing libel in divorce in the case of Anthony Begley v. Annie Begley.

Before Or-lady, P. J., Porter, Henderson, Trexler, Keller, Linn and Gawthrop, JJ.

Affirmed.

Libel in divorce, Before Bechtel, P. J.

*186The case was referred to E. J. O’Donnell, Esq., as master, who recommended that the libel be dismissed.

On exceptions to the master’s report the court dismissed the exceptions and dismissed the libel. Libellant appealed.

*Error assigned*was the order of the court.

*B. J. Duffy,*for appellant.

*M. M. Burke,*and with him *P. H. Burke,*for appellee.

May 5, 1924:

Per Curiam,

This appeal by a husband from the dismissal of his libel in divorce for alleged desertion, was submitted to us without oral argument. The parties, a widower with children, and a widow with children, were married in June, 1920; disputes and differences resulted almost immediately ; he called her a cripple and a beggar, and told her to take her children and “get out.” In August, 1920, she took him at his word.- While she was away, he asked her to return to him. She said to him, “how can I go to live with you, when you don’t want me”; whereupon he said to the other men, [whom he had taken along as witnesses, because “he was afraid to get hit with a broomstick”] “come on, let her go to hell.” She also testified: “I am willing to go to live with him......if he stops calling me names and ordering me out..... .The day I left, he went to beat me, but his oldest girl interfered and pushed him away.” We note that libellant’s oldest daughter so referred to, was not called to testify in contradiction of that assault. There is no evidence of desertion. The master concluded the libel should be dismissed; the court below considered exceptions to his report and concluded with the master; we have read the record and the briefs, and agree with the conclusion reached below.

Libel dismissed at the cost of appellant.
No. 55135.

#### S. B. Penick & Co. *v.*United States,

protests 138128-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

The protests were dismissed.
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bayou City Exploration, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Stephen C. Larkin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Stephen C. LarkinStephen C. LarkinChief Financial Officer
 May 13, 2011
Document

Trimble OneBonus Plan Description
1.Definitions:
a.“Plan” means this Trimble OneBonus Plan.
b.“Company” means Trimble Inc., a Delaware corporation.
c.“Committee” means the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company.
d.“Form 10-K” means the Company’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K.
e.“ARR” or “Annual Recurring Revenue” is a performance measure that indicates the value of the Company's current recurring revenue contracts. ARR represents the estimated annualized value of recurring revenue, calculated as described in the Form 10-K.
f.“EBITDA” means Adjusted EBITDA as described in the Form 10‐K.
g.“Revenue” means non-GAAP revenue as described in the Form 10‐K.
2.Participation in the Plan is determined by employee job level and includes the CEO of the Company, all of the Vice Presidents of the Company, and a number of senior-level managers and individual contributors.
3.Payments earned under the Plan depend upon (i) the Company’s Revenue (20%), EBITDA (40%) and ARR (40%); and (ii) various sector or franchise level financial measurements as determined by the CEO and the Committee and as adjusted for significant FX (foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations), acquisitions or divestitures, each with certain goals and minimum thresholds as established by the CEO and the Committee, and measured over two financial measurement periods. The first financial measurement period will be from January to June of each year, and the second financial measurement period will be from July to December of each year.
4.Target payouts, ranging from 3% to 80% of base annual salary for each participant (other than the CEO) are determined by employee job level or, at more senior levels, determined by the CEO and approved by the Committee. The Committee has established a 125% target for the CEO.
5.The payout under the Plan ranges from zero to 200% of each participant’s target, upon achievement of each fiscal year’s planned goals over the two measurement periods based on the corporate level financial measurements and any sector or franchise level financial measurements. Payments are made on an annual basis, after the close of the respective fiscal year based on achievement of planned goals. All payments are made net of employment, income and other applicable tax withholding. Participants may be required to remain continuously employed through a payment date to be entitled to a payout for the applicable period.
6.No payout under the Plan shall be intended to be deferred compensation under section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and shall be interpreted accordingly. In this regard, all payouts under the Plan (to the extent otherwise payable pursuant to the terms of the Plan) shall be made no later than 2 1/2 months following the end of the year in which the payout is no longer subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture.
7.The Plan shall continue in effect, from year to year, until terminated or amended by the Committee.
<PAGE>   1


                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.61



                                                       July 1, 1998



Mr. Steven J. Lee
112 Farm Road
Sherborn, MA   01770


                    Re:  Amendment of Employment Agreement
                         ---------------------------------


Dear Steve,

This letter agreement serves to further amend the employment agreement dated as
of May 16, 1990, by and between you and PolyMedica Industries, Inc. (the
"Company"), as amended by certain letter agreements dated as of June 1, 1991;
December 5, 1991; March 18, 1993; March 31, 1994; April 11, 1995; April 3, 1996;
and July 1, 1997 (together, the "Employment Agreement").

         TERM OF EMPLOYMENT. The Employment Period, as defined in Section 2 of
         the Employment Agreement, is extended to November 30, 2000.

If the foregoing is acceptable to you, please indicate your agreement by signing
a copy of this letter agreement and returning it to the undersigned.




                                            Very truly yours,


                                            /s/ Arthur A. Siciliano
                                            -------------------------------- 
                                            Arthur A. Siciliano
                                            President


ACCEPTED AND AGREED TO:



/s/ Steven J. Lee
------------------------------
Steven J. Lee
# L_2022125DE.01000401.xml

| 28.4.2022 | DE | Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union | L 125/4 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.4.2022

DE

Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union

L 125/4

---

Berichtigung der der Durchführungsverordnung (EU) 2022/209 der Kommission vom 16. Februar 2022 zur Festlegung des Formats der zu erhebenden und zu meldenden Daten für die Bestimmung des Verkaufsvolumens und der Anwendung von antimikrobiellen Arzneimitteln bei Tieren gemäß der Verordnung (EU) 2019/6 des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates

(
  Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 35 vom 17. Februar 2022
  )

Seite 13, Anhang II Tabelle Abschnitt 1 („Für jede Produktaufmachung zu meldende Daten“) Nummer 10, zweite Spalte:

Anstatt:

„Packungsgröße“,

muss es heißen:

„Maßeinheit für die Packungsgröße“.

---
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-6447

RASTAMAN MTUME OBALAJI MFUME I, a/k/a Herbert

Lee Bailey,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

PARKER EVATT; WILLIAM R. DAVIS; JAMES R.

ARCHIE; MILAN O. BRADOVICH,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of

South Carolina, at Rock Hill. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District

Judge. (CA-94-3177-0-20BD)

Submitted: October 17, 1996 Decided: October 24, 1996

Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior

Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rastaman Mtume Obalaji Mfume I, Appellant Pro Se. William Paul

Griggs, GRIGGS, SPRUILL & HARRIS, Cheraw, South Carolina, for

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying

relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed

the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Mfume I v. Evatt, No. CA-94-3177-0-20BD (D.S.C. Feb. 20,

1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>


                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2


I, Norman G. Haisler, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Blue Ridge Energy,
   Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
   statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
   make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
   statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
   this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
   information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
   respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
   registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
   establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
   in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

   a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
      information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
      subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
      particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
      prepared;

   b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
      procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
      effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
      the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

   c) disclosed in this quarterly report any significant changes in the
      registrant's internal controls over financial reporting that occurred
      during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that have materially
      affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's
      internal controls over financial reporting.

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
   most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
   of registrant's board of directors:

   a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
      controls over financial reporting which could adversely affect the
      registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
      data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material
      weakness in internal controls over financial reporting.

   b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
      employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
      controls over financial reporting;


Date: August 14, 2003                           /s/ Norman G. Haisler
                                                Chief Financial Officer



                                       22
##### 



Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
UNDER SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  I, Steven S. Myers, certify that:1.
    
    I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of SM&A;2.
    
    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
report;3.
    
    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of
the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant
and have:  a)
    
    Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known
to us by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this report is being prepared;b)
    
    [Intentionally omitted.]c)
    
    Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures,
as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
evaluation; andd)
    
    Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the
registrants internal control over financial reporting; and  5.
    
    The registrants other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,
to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants
board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):  a)
    
    All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the
design or operation of internal control over financial reporting
which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants
ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; andb)
    
    Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting. Dated: April 16, 2004
    /s/  STEVEN S. MYERSSteven S. MyersChairman and Chief Executive Officer
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 10.19

                [THE MAURITIUS COMMERCIAL BANK LTD. LETTER HEAD]

Our reference: HMV/ma

16th July 2002.

The Directors,
Novel Textiles Ltd.,
c/o MCB Reception Desk,
Port Louis.

FOR THE ATTENTION OF MR. ALAIN REV

Gentlemen,

Further to the recent conversations over the phone between your Mr. Alain Rey
and the undersigned, we are pleased to confirm our willingness to make available
to your esteemed company the facilities as shown below, on the following terms
and conditions:

a) TERM LOAN             : convert part of the existing medium term loan of
                           Rs. 100M. into a medium term loan of USD 1,750,000.

b) EARLY REPAYMENT       : Authorize the early repayment, free of any penalty,
                           of the balance of about Rs. 47,500,000, on the
                           existing medium term loan of Rs. 100M.

   PURPOSE                  : a) & b) Financial reconstruction.

   REPAYMENT                : a) Sixty (60) equal and consecutive monthly
                              installments, the first payable one month - end of
                              month - after disbursement expected to be made on
                              or before the 31st July 2002.

                              b) On or before the 31st July 2002.

   INTEREST                 : At the exceptional rate of LIBOR USD 1 month +
                              0.75%, payable monthly.

   FACILITY FEE             : None

   SECURITY                 : Existing floating charges totaling Rs. 305M.,
                              ranking part passu with existing charges totaling
                              Rs. 123M. in favour of BNPI.

   CONDITIONS               : a) As per our letter dated 14th August 2001, duly
                              acknowledged.

                              b) Standard condition governing such facilities.

Should the above proposal meet with your approval, you are kindly invited to
return to us the duplicate of this letter, duly signed.

Assuring you of our best services at all times.

Yours sincerely,                                          [SEAL]
                                                          12/8/02

[ILLEGIBLE]             [ILLEGIBLE]
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-6074

DERRICK EDWIN RECTOR,

Petitioner - Appellant,

versus

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Respondent - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief

District Judge. (CA-97-833-5-BO)

Submitted: April 29, 1998 Decided: May 18, 1998

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Derrick Edwin Rector, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

See Local Rule 36(c).
2

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on

his motion to reconsider the court's dismissal without prejudice of

his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994), because Appellant

failed to show that the remedy under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West 1994

& Supp. 1998), was inadequate or ineffective. We have reviewed the

record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district

court. Rector v. United States, No. CA-97-833-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Dec.

22, 1997). We note that § 2255 is not rendered inadequate or ineffective merely because Appellant may be procedurally barred from

filing the motion. See In re Vial, 115 F.3d 1192, 1194 n.5 (4th

Cir. 1997) (citing Garris v. Lindsay, 794 F.2d 722, 726-27 (D.C.

Cir. 1986) (per curiam)). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

IN RE: ESTATE OF MARY AGNES 

LEWIS

PETITION OF: RICHARD T. LEWIS

:

:

:

:

:

No. 116 WM 2016

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 12th day of January, 2017, the Petition for Leave to File Petition 

for Allowance of Appeal Nunc Pro Tunc is DENIED, and the Application to Strike is 

DISMISSED AS MOOT.
Exhibit 32.1  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the Annual Report of Convera Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended January 31, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Patrick C. Condo, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:  (1)
        The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
  (2)
        The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
   By:/s/ Patrick C. Condo Patrick C. Condo President and Chief Executive Officer April 30, 2007