# C_2015294EN.01007301.xml

| 7.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 294/73 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 294/73

---

Action brought on 3 June 2015 — Vakakis v Commission

(Case T-292/15)

(2015/C 294/88)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Vakakis International — Symvouloi gia Agrotiki Anaptixi AE (Athens, Greece) (represented by: B. O’Connor, Solicitor, S. Gubel and E. Bertolotto, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | hold the Commission liable under Article 340 TFUE to compensate all damages incurred by the applicant due to the unlawful conduct of the Commission during the public procurement procedure in question, including the:






  — | costs and expenses of the participation to the overall tender exercise; |
| --- | --- | --- |

—

hold the Commission liable under Article 340 TFUE to compensate all damages incurred by the applicant due to the unlawful conduct of the Commission during the public procurement procedure in question, including the:

—

costs and expenses of the participation to the overall tender exercise;

| — | costs of the challenge of the legality of the tender exercise; |
| --- | --- |

—

costs of the challenge of the legality of the tender exercise;

| — | loss of profit; |
| --- | --- |

—

loss of profit;

| — | loss of opportunities. |
| --- | --- |

—

loss of opportunities.

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs of the present action. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs of the present action.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging that the Commission breached the principles of equal treatment, sound administration and legitimate expectations as codified by Council Regulation No 1605/2002 (‘the Financial Regulation’) and the Practical Guide to contract procedures for EU external actions (‘PRAG’) by failing to adequately supervise the tender procedure and promptly investigate and provide full and complete information on the investigation of the complaint lodged by Vakakis; |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging that the Commission breached the principles of equal treatment, sound administration and legitimate expectations as codified by Council Regulation No 1605/2002 (‘the Financial Regulation’) and the Practical Guide to contract procedures for EU external actions (‘PRAG’) by failing to adequately supervise the tender procedure and promptly investigate and provide full and complete information on the investigation of the complaint lodged by Vakakis;

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging that the applicant has been damaged as a result of the Commission maladministration and the decision to award the contract to Agriconsulting. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging that the applicant has been damaged as a result of the Commission maladministration and the decision to award the contract to Agriconsulting.

| 3. | Third plea in law, alleging that the applicant has suffered damages as a result of the Commission maladministration and the breach of the Union general principles of equal treatment, sound administration and the protection of legitimate expectations as well as the infringement of Article 94 of the Financial Regulation and Section 2.3.6. of the PRAG. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Third plea in law, alleging that the applicant has suffered damages as a result of the Commission maladministration and the breach of the Union general principles of equal treatment, sound administration and the protection of legitimate expectations as well as the infringement of Article 94 of the Financial Regulation and Section 2.3.6. of the PRAG.

---