alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 99.2

| CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                                                                        |
|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
| **18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002** |

In connection with the quarterly report of Shoe Pavilion, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 28, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the“Report”), I, John D. Hellmann, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of myknowledge:

| (1)                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and |
|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  
 
(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company

 

/s/  JOHN D. HELLMANN

 
 
**Vice President and Chief Financial Officer November 7, 2002**

 
This certification accompanies the Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. |
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 120 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  2d Session
H. J. RES. 120

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

            October 28 (legislative day, September 22), 2000

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year 2001, and 
                          for other purposes.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled, That Public Law 106-275, is 
further amended by striking

the date specified in section 106(c) and inserting ``October 31, 
2000''.

            Passed the House of Representatives October 30, 2000.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT

NOTICE OF TERMINATION OF WAGE GARNISHMENT ORDER (SF-329E)

RE: 4.a. Employee Name: 5. Employee Social Security No.:

TO: 

FROM: 

6. Employer: 7. Employer Mailing Address 

(include street address, p.o. box, suite no., city, state, zip code): 

8. Creditor Agency: 

10. Contact Name: 11. Telephone No.: 

12. Internet e-mail address: 13. Fax No.: 

9. Creditor Agency Mailing Address for Correspondence

(include street address, city, state, zip code): 

STANDARD FORM 329E (1/2005) Prescribed by 31 CFR 285.11 

Title: 

CREDITOR AGENCY SIGNATURE 

Print Name: 

AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION 

SAMPLE
SAMPLE
Exhibit 32.2





SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATIONS





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO\


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the quarterly report of Exobox Technologies Corp. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jacob P. Cukjati, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report materially complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.








Date: November 14, 2010








/s/ Jacob P. CukjatiJacob P. Cukjati

Chief Financial Officer
No. 57145.

protest 194621-K (New York).

#### Frank J. Markwalter & Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

From an examination of the papers in this case, the court found nothing therein which tended in any way to overcome the presumption of correctness attaching to the decision of the collector of customs. The protest was therefore overruled.
Exhibit 32


In connection with the Annual Report of Real Logic, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Bradford L. Tolley, Chief
Executive Officer and Treasurer (principal financial officer) of the Company,
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge and belief:


          1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
               or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and


          2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
               material respects, the financial condition and result of
               operations of the Company.



Date:  September 8, 2006

Signed:                                    /s/ Bradford L. Tolley
                                           -------------------------------------
                                           Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer
EXHIBIT
32.1




CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO
 18
U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
 SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
 
 In
connection with the Annual Report of China Nuvo Solar Energy, Inc. (the
“Company”) on Form 10-K for the period ended July 31, 2009, as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Henry
Fong, Principal Executive Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:
 
 1.
              The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
 
 2.
              The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company, as of, and for the periods presented in the
    Report.
 
 /s/ Henry FongHenry
      FongPrincipal
      Executive OfficerDecember
      15, 2009
  A signed original of this
written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to China Nuvo Solar
Energy, Inc. and will be retained by China Nuvo Solar Energy, Inc. and furnished
to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 214 (Tuesday, November 7, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 76835]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-24568]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Office of the Secretary


Notice of Interest Rate on Overdue Debts

    Section 30.18 of the Department of Health and Human Services' 
claims collection regulations (45 CFR part 30) provides that the 
Secretary shall charge an annual rate of interest, which is determined 
and fixed by the Secretary of the Treasury after considering private 
consumer rates of interest on the date that the Department of Health 
and Human Services becomes entitled to recovery. The rate cannot be 
lower than the Department of Treasury's current value of funds rate or 
the applicable rate determined from the ``Schedule of Certified 
Interest Rates with Range of Maturities'' unless the Secretary waives 
interest in whole or part, or a different rate is prescribed by 
statute, contract, or repayment agreement. The Secretary of the 
Treasury may revise this rate quarterly. The Department of Health and 
Human Services publishes this rate in the Federal Register.
    The current rate of 12 1/8%, as fixed by the Secretary of the 
Treasury, is certified for the quarter ended September 30, 2023. This 
rate is based on the Interest Rates for Specific Legislation, 
``National Health Services Corps Scholarship Program (42 U.S.C. 
254o(b)(1)(A))'' and ``National Research Service Award Program (42 
U.S.C. 288(c)(4)(B)).'' This interest rate will be applied to overdue 
debt until the Department of Health and Human Services publishes a 
revision.

David C. Horn,
Director, Office of Financial Policy and Reporting.
[FR Doc. 2023-24568 Filed 11-6-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4150-04-P
Case 2:02-cv-04086-HH Document 9 Filed 08/27/2002 Page 1 of 21
Case 2:02-cv-04086-HH Document 9 Filed 08/27/2002 Page 2 of 21
Case 2:02-cv-04086-HH Document 9 Filed 08/27/2002 Page 3 of 21
Case 2:02-cv-04086-HH Document 9 Filed 08/27/2002 Page 4 of 21
Case 2:02-cv-04086-HH Document 9 Filed 08/27/2002 Page 5 of 21
Case 2:02-cv-04086-HH Document 9 Filed 08/27/2002 Page 6 of 21
Case 2:02-cv-04086-HH Document 9 Filed 08/27/2002 Page 7 of 21
Case 2:02-cv-04086-HH Document 9 Filed 08/27/2002 Page 8 of 21
Case 2:02-cv-04086-HH Document 9 Filed 08/27/2002 Page 9 of 21
Case 2:02-cv-04086-HH Document 9 Filed 08/27/2002 Page 10 of 21
Case 2:02-cv-04086-HH Document 9 Filed 08/27/2002 Page 11 of 21
Case 2:02-cv-04086-HH Document 9 Filed 08/27/2002 Page 12 of 21
Case 2:02-cv-04086-HH Document 9 Filed 08/27/2002 Page 13 of 21
Case 2:02-cv-04086-HH Document 9 Filed 08/27/2002 Page 14 of 21
Case 2:02-cv-04086-HH Document 9 Filed 08/27/2002 Page 15 of 21
Case 2:02-cv-04086-HH Document 9 Filed 08/27/2002 Page 16 of 21
Case 2:02-cv-04086-HH Document 9 Filed 08/27/2002 Page 17 of 21
Case 2:02-cv-04086-HH Document 9 Filed 08/27/2002 Page 18 of 21
Case 2:02-cv-04086-HH Document 9 Filed 08/27/2002 Page 19 of 21
Case 2:02-cv-04086-HH Document 9 Filed 08/27/2002 Page 20 of 21
Case 2:02-cv-04086-HH Document 9 Filed 08/27/2002 Page 21 of 21
No. 64749.

#### Instrumentation Associates, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 60/4037 and 60/4038 (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

An examination of the official papers substantiating the allegation and following Abstract 54925, the protests were dismissed.
Before the Third Division,

April 16, 1959

No. 62978.

#### Atlanta Trading Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 307345-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Erom an examination of the collector’s additional memorandum, received in evidence at the trial, it appears that 5 out of the 12 propellers imported were of American manufacture. The protest was abandoned as to the other 7 propellers. On the record presented and following Abstract 57104, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained as to the 5 propellers. The protest was dismissed as to the other 7 propellers.
# 		Sorry, something went wrong

An unexpected error has occurred.Web Parts Maintenance Page: If you have permission, you can use this page to temporarily close Web Parts or remove personal settings. For more information, contact your site administrator.

Technical Details

Troubleshoot issues with Microsoft SharePoint Foundation.

Correlation ID: 38a523a1-7478-a055-6128-087f914e235b

Date and Time: 4/29/2024 12:39:35 AM

----

Go back to site
Case No. 7,791.

#### KING v. FORCE.

[2 Cranch, C. C. 208.]1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

June Term, 1820.

Trial or Title to Copyright — Issue prom Chancery— Bill and Answer as Evidence — Dat^ or Entry op Map — Failure to Engrave on Face Thereop.

1. On the trial of an issue from chancery to try the title to copyright, tne bill and answer cannot be read in evidence to the jury, unless it be so ordered by the-court of chancery when the issue is ordered.

2. The omission to have the date of depositing the title of the map engraved thereon, is fatal to the plaintiff’s title.

[Cited in Farmer v. Calvert Lithographing, Etc.. Co., Case No. 4,051.]

This was an issue from chancery, to try the complainant’s title to a map of the city of Washington.

Mr. Key and Mr. Caldwell, offered to read the bill and answer in evidence to the jury; *522and stated that in the case of Peter’s will, the libel and answer in the orphans’ court had been read in evidence.

Mr. Jones, for complainant [Robert King], objected that the bill and answer cannot be read in evidence, unless it be so ordered by the court of chancery at the time of ordering the issue.

1

 [Reported by Hon. William Cranch, Chief Judge.]

THE COURT

(nem. con.) refused to permit the bill and answer to be read in evidence for the defendant [Peter Force], it not naving been so ordered at the time of directing the issue; and the jury having been sworn, it is too late now for this court, as a court of chancery to make the order, as it would be a surprise upon the complainant.

Mr. Key, for defendant, contended that the omission of the plaintiff to cause the date of the entry of the map to be engraved upon the face thereof, according to the provision of the 29th of April, 1802, was fatal to the plaintiff’s title.

Mr. Jones, admitted this objection to be fatal, and THE COURT so instructed the jury; whereupon the following entry was made in the minutes of the court: “King v. Force. Upon the trial of the issue in this case, it appearing from the face of the map, whereof the plaintiff claimed the copyright, that the plaintiff as the author and proprietor of the said map, had not caused to be impressed upon the face thereof the words denoting the date of the entry according to the act of congress, in strict pursuance of the first section of the act of congress passed on the 29th day of April, 1802 (2 Stat. 171), entitled an act supplementary to an act entitled an act for the encouragement of learning, &c., the court thereupon, at the motion of the defendant’s counsel decided and so instructed the jury, that by reason of the said omission, the plaintiff was not entitled to claim the copyright of the map in question, or any benefit of the act to which the above-mentioned act is a supplement; whereupon the plaintiff, by protestation reserving his right to republish his said map, with a. correction of the error and omission above suggested, prayed leave to dismiss his bill of injunction, and discharge the jury from any further consideration of the issue aforesaid; which is done accordingly.”
IV 

House Calendar No. 145 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 900 

[Report No. 115–679] 

Providing for further consideration of the bill (H.R. 2) to provide for the 

reform and continuation of agricultural and other programs of the Department of Agriculture through fiscal year 2023, and for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

MAY 16, 2018 

Mr. NEWHOUSE, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for further consideration of the bill (H.R. 2) to 

provide for the reform and continuation of agricultural 

and other programs of the Department of Agriculture 

through fiscal year 2023, and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved, That at any time after adoption of this reso2 lution the Speaker may, pursuant to clause 2(b) of rule 

3 XVIII, declare the House resolved into the Committee of 

4 the Whole House on the state of the Union for further 

5 consideration of the bill (H.R. 2) to provide for the reform 

6 and continuation of agricultural and other programs of the 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 900 RH 

1 Department of Agriculture through fiscal year 2023, and 

2 for other purposes. No further amendment to the com3 mittee amendment in the nature of a substitute shall be 

4 in order except those printed in the report of the Com5 mittee on Rules accompanying this resolution. Each such 

6 further amendment may be offered only in the order print7 ed in the report, may be offered only by a Member des8 ignated in the report, shall be considered as read, shall 

9 be debatable for the time specified in the report equally 

10 divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent, 

11 shall not be subject to amendment, and shall not be sub12 ject to a demand for division of the question in the House 

13 or in the Committee of the Whole. All points of order 

14 against such further amendments are waived. At the con15 clusion of consideration of the bill for amendment pursu16 ant to this resolution the Committee shall rise and report 

17 the bill to the House with such amendments as may have 

18 been adopted. Any Member may demand a separate vote 

19 in the House on any amendment adopted in the Com20 mittee of the Whole to the bill or to the committee amend21 ment in the nature of a substitute. The previous question 

22 shall be considered as ordered on the bill and amendments 

23 thereto to final passage without intervening motion except 

24 one motion to recommit with or without instructions. 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS

lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
House Calendar No. 145 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 900 

[Report No. 115–679] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for further consideration of the bill (H.R. 

and for other purposes. ment of Agriculture through fiscal year 2023, agricultural and other programs of the Depart2) to provide for the reform and continuation of 

MAY 16, 2018 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


lotter on DSKBCFDHB2PROD with BILLS
Exhibit 31.2I, Christopher R. Sachs, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Form 10-KSB of Hartville Group, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact oromit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstancesunder which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by thisreport;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operationsand cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintainingdisclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) forthe registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materiallyaffected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who havea significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Dated: March 31, 2008         /s/ Christopher R. Sachs   Christopher R. Sachs,   Chief Accounting Officer  
48
Before the First Division,

June 29, 1950

No. 54499.

#### M. E. Dey & Company, Inc., and W. C. Sullivan & Company,

protests 136652-K and 147220-K/2082 (Milwaukee and Chicago).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
(Reap. Dec. 10293)

Entry No. 730988.

#### Harry Solodow *v.*United States

(Decided July 11, 1962)

*351
      *Albert Viault*for tlie plaintiff.

*Joseph D. Guilfoyle,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

WilsoN, Judge:

This suit has been submitted for decision on the following agreement between counsel for the respective parties:

> It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between counsel for the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise subject of the above-entitled appeal for reappraisement consists of coal-tar medicináis dutiable under Paragraph 28(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended;

> That said merchandise is not listed on the final list promulgated under the provisions of the Custom Simplification Act of 1956, and is therefore subject to appraisement under Section 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended;

> That a similar competitive product is manufactured and sold in the United States at $2.25 per 1000 tablets;

> That under the provisions of Paragraph 28(a) the instant merchandise is properly dutiable on the basis of the American selling price of a similar competitive article sold in the United States;

> That the said American selling price, as defined in Section 402(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, on the date of exportation of the merchandise herein is $2.25 per 1000 tablets; and

> It is further stipulated that the appeal be deemed submitted for decision on this stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find that American selling price, as that value is defined in section 402(e) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise herein involved, and that such value is $2.25 per 1,000 tablets.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-14-0001053 23-JAN-2017 12:16 PM
No. 49935.

#### Protests 68838-K, etc., of Fujimoto Trading Co. et al. (Honolulu).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated and agreed that the merchandise in question is similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Mutual Supply Co.*v. *United States*(12 Cust. Ct. 136, C. D. 842). In accordance therewith the merchandise was held dutiable at 25 percent under paragraph 775 as modified by T. D. 48075. The protests were sustained to this extent.