alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**EXHIBIT 31.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION**

 

I, Dmitry Beinus, certify that: 

 

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Shoe Pavilion, Inc. for the period ended July 2, 2005; 

 

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report; 

 

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 

 

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have: 

 

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensurethat material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; 

 

b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based upon such evaluation; 

 

c) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and 

 

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): 

 

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and 

 

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Date: August 16, 2005
Case No. 8,963.

#### MAGRUDER v. BANK OF WASHINGTON.

[Cited in Brent v. Coyle, Case No. 1,S37. Nowhere reported; opinion not now accessible.)
COURT OF APPEALS

SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00417-CV

In the Estate of Robert R. Cole, 

Deceased

§

§

§

§

From the Probate Court

of Denton County (PR-2009-00804)

January 29, 2015

Opinion by Justice Gabriel

JUDGMENT

This court has considered the record on appeal in this case and holds that 

there was error in part of the trial court’s judgment. It is ordered that the 

judgment of the trial court is affirmed in part and reversed in part. The trial court 

correctly determined that whether the will put Judith Cole to an election was a 

question of law for the court to determine; however, the trial court erred by 

concluding as a matter of law that Robert R. Cole, Sr.’s will put Judith Cole to 

such an election. Judith Cole did not contest the will such that the forfeiture 

clause was triggered; thus, the jury should not have been instructed on Judith

Cole’s affirmative defense. However, because Judith Cole did not contest the 

will under the forfeiture clause, the submission of the affirmative defense was 

harmless. The evidence sufficiently supported the jury’s finding that the repairs 

and improvements to the homestead were not capital improvements subject to 
reimbursement. These holdings, taken as a whole, result in our conclusion that 

the trial court’s judgment must be reversed in part, and we render a judgment for 

Judith Cole awarding her one-half of the shares in the investment account that 

were not determined to be Robert R. Cole, Sr.’s separate property. We affirm the 

remainder of the trial court’s judgment. See Tex. R. App. P. 43.2(a), (c).

It is further ordered that all parties shall bear their own costs of this appeal, 

for which let execution issue. 

SECOND DISTRICT COURT OF APPEALS 

By /s/ Lee Gabriel

 Justice Lee Gabriel
Before the First Division,

March 30, 1961

No. 65346.

#### Wolf Greenspan & Son, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 60/20558 (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of valances similar in all material respects to those the subject of *D. N. & E. Walter & Co. et al.*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 26, C.D. 2098), except that they are composed entirely of plastic, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 53939.

#### Inter-Ocean Forwarding Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 134562-K and 148499-K (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation that the merchandise consists of laurel leaves similar in all material respects to those the subject of *The Levy & Levis Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(23 Cust. Ct. 8, C. D. 1180), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
PROTECTIONAGENCY ASHINGTON, D.C. 20460



### Dr. InCs 

### R. Triay, Manager Carlsbad Field Office 

### U.S. Department of Energy P.O. Box 3090 Carlsbad, 

### NM 9922 1-3090 OFFICE OF AIR AND RADIATION



### Dear Dr. Triay.



### A modification rulemaking take a minimum of 12months to complete from receipt of "complete" information change. It is our intention to 

### refrain fiom conducting modification in which, by 

### statute, we 

### are required to consider the 

### WIPP rulemaking likely would not be 

### completed before application (expected to be 

### submitted to 

### EPA this proposal until after we have issued our in this regard in our December 2000 you dated April 24, 2002, and to work with the



### @ Pnhfed onRecycled Paper2 Without EPA's approvaJ oft

# r changeto the paneJ closure design system, DOEshouJd ensUf: that.Conditi?n ~of the WIPP ertification Decision is reflected in the WIPP compJiance recertIfication applIcation. If you have any questionsple,se call Betsy Forinashat (202) 564-9310.



# Jt(~ Fr Marcinowski, Director Radiation Protection Division
Lynne Smith, DOE/HQ Cindy Zvonar, DOE/CBFO RussPatterson,

DOE/CBFO MatthewSilva, EEG SteveZappe, NMED

. cc:
No. 67763.

#### Border Brokerage Co. *v.*United States,

protests 60/4597, etc. (Seattle).

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of sets of different colored red cedar sample shingles, treated in such a manner as to be unsuitable for sale or for use otherwise than as samples, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 53449.

protests 138436-K, etc. (New York).

#### Hearns Dept. Stores, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

The protests were dismissed.
[- IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT |
Ly FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA /

. )
IN RE: Letter of Request from the District )

Attorney of Budapest, Hungary ) Misc. No. ou me Ol |
for Assistance in the Criminal )
Matter of Sergey Ivashkevich )
a)

vee “
has

ORDER

MiLrines

Upon application of the United States, and upon review of the letter of request of

May 13, 2003, from the District Attorney of Budapest, Hungary, seeking evidence for use in a
judicial proceeding in Hungary and the Court having fully considered this matter, IT IS
HEREBY ORDERED, pursuant to the authority conferred by 28 U.S.C. § 1782 and this Court's
inherent authority, that Assistant United States Attomey Andrea G. Foulkes is appointed as a
Commissioner of this Court and is hereby directed to exccute the letter of request as follows:

1. take such steps as are necessary, including issuance of commissioner's subpoenas
to be served on persons within the jurisdiction of this Court, to collect the evidence requested;

2. provide notice with respect to the collection of evidence to those persons
identified in the request as parties to whom notice should be given (and no notice to any other
party shall be required);

3. adopt procedures to collect the evidence requested consistent with its use as
evidence in a procecding before a tribunal in Hungary, which procedures may be specified in the

request or provided by the requesting court or authority or by a representative of Hungary,


4. seek such further orders of this Court as may be necessary to execute this request;
and

5. certify and submit the evidence collected to the Office of International Affairs,
Criminal Division, United States Department of Justice, or as otherwise directed by that office
for transmission to the requesting court or authority.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in collecting the evidence requested, the

Commissioner may be accompanied by persons whose presence or participation is authorized by
the Commissioner, including, without limitation, special agents of the Hungarian Police

Department, the Hungarian District Attorney of Budapest and/or representatives of Hungary.

by anthee AMrhe

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dated: ‘= 670.2004

ee
A Trurll SC viele ) /- Aon of

Ce

“TERE. (). Gait

2 SORE
No. 68627.

protests 62/5054, etc. (New York).

#### Gemsco, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of insignia similar in all material respects to those involved in Abstract 66583, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                             729
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           3,373
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                          0
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          16,150
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            16,735
<LOANS>                                         67,513
<ALLOWANCE>                                        300
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 113,253
<DEPOSITS>                                      82,573
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                687
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      29,993
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 113,253
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  4,130
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                2,007
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   205
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 6,342
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               2,775
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               2,775
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            3,567
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  2,437
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  1,215
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         802
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       802
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.32
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.32
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.10
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                        58
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   300
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  300
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               300
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
# Tiếng Việt

## Thông Báo cho Người Vay về Ngôn Ngữ 

**Giao dịch cho vay thế chấp của bạn có thể sẽ được tiến hành bằng tiếng Anh.**Thông tin bạn nhận được và các tài liệu chính thức bạn sẽ ký sẽ có khả năng bằng tiếng Anh.

**Chúng tôi muốn bạn hiểu giao dịch. Các bản dịch có thể được cung cấp để bổ sung cho các tài liệu tiếng Anh.** Các tài liệu này là để giúp bạn hiểu được giao dịch. Người cho vay hoặc người phục vụ của bạn có thể không cung cấp cho bạn dịch vụ dịch hoặc các tài liệu dịch.

**Trợ giúp ngôn ngữ và các nguồn lực cũng có thể được cung cấp thông qua các cơ quan tư vấn về nhà ở**được Bộ Phát triển Nhà và Đô thị của Hoa Kỳ (HUD) chấp thuận. Bạn có thể tìm thấy một danh sách các cơ quan tư vấn nhà ở được HUD công nhận tại www.hud.gov/counseling.

1. Chọn "housing counseling agency" gần bạn, sau đó chọn tiểu bang của bạn.

2. Để tìm các cơ quan tư vấn nhà ở trong khu vực của bạn, mà sử dụng nói ngôn ngữ của bạn, hãy chọn " Click here to narrow your search " và chọn một ngôn ngữ.

3. Hoặc gọi cho HUD ở số 800-569-4287 để được giúp đỡ trong việc tìm một cố vấn. 

Thông tin về cố vấn gia cư cũng có sẵn tại www.consumerfinance.gov/find-a-housing-counselor.

1 | Page		Revised 9/2017
Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

as adopted pursuant to Section 906

of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002



In connection with this Annual Report for Fiscal 2016 Ended August 31, 2016 of Golden Goliath Resources Ltd., a company organized under the British Columbia Corporations Act(the Company) on Form 20-F as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Stephen Pearce, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. (S) 1350, as adopted pursuant to (S) 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



(1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and



(2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.





/s/  Stephen Pearce

Stephen Pearce, Chief Financial Officer





Date: January 18, 2017
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES

v.

RICHARD BALLARD

CRIMINAL ACTION

NO. 03-810

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 7th day of July, 2017, upon consideration of Motion to Correct 

Sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc. No. 135, filed June 15, 2016), Order of the United States 

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit granting movant’s application to file a second or 

successive § 2255 motion (Doc. No. 136, filed October 21, 2016), Memorandum of Law in 

Support of Motion to Correct Sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc. No. 139, filed March 28, 

2017), Government’s Response to Defendant’s Motion for Relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc. 

No. 143, filed April 24, 2017), and Reply Memorandum (Doc. No. 146, filed May 23, 2017), for 

the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum dated July 7, 2017, IT IS ORDERED

that Motion to Correct Sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is GRANTED on the ground that 

defendant, who was sentenced on March 23, 2006, under the Armed Career Criminal Act, no 

longer qualifies as an Armed Career Criminal under 18 U.S.C. § 924(e). Defendant shall be 

RESENTENCED in due course without consideration of the Armed Career Criminal Act. Until 

defendant is resentenced, the sentence imposed on March 23, 2006, remains in effect. 

BY THE COURT:

 /s/ Hon. Jan E. DuBois

 DuBOIS, JAN E., J.
Page1of1Subject: QCreatedBy:ScheduledDate:CreationDate:From:NoticeofMarylandCertificationforCleanAirActSection110(a)(2),Lead(Pb)InfrastructureSIPjwiIkinsoncmde.state.md.us10/31/20122:56PMJimWilkinsonDate&Time10/31/20122:56PM11/1/20124:01AM10/31/20123:04PM11/1/20124:04AM10/31/20122:56PM11/1/20124:14AM11/1/20124:12AM10/31/20122:57PM10/31/20122:56PM10/31/20122:56PM10/31/20122:57PM10/31/20122:56PM11/1/20124:45AM11/2/20129:11AM11/1/20124:18AMRecipientTo:ali.mirzakhalili@state.de.us(ali.mirzakhalili@state.de.us)CC:AngeloBianca(abianca@mde.statemd.us)To:bill.osullivan@dep.state.nj.us(bill.osullivan@dep.statenj.us)CC:BrianHug(bhug@mde.state.md.us)To:cecily.bealldc.gov(cecily.beall@dc.gov)CC:DebbieRabin(drabin@mde.state.md.us)CC:DianeFranks(dfranks@mde.state.md.us)CC:frankford.harold@epa.gov(frankford.harold@epa.gov)To:jepps@statepa.usOepps@state.pa.us)To:John.ABenedictwv.gov(JohnA.Benedict@wv.gov)CC:lindenmelissa@epa.gov(linden.melissa©epa.gov)To:mgdowd@deq.virginia.gov(mgdowd@deq.virginia.gov)CC:RogerThunell(rthunell@mde.state.nid.us)BC:SallyFrampton(sframpton@mde.statejmd.us)CC:TadAburn(gaburn@mdestate.md.us)ActionTransferredThird-PartyDownloadedDeliveredThird-PartyDownloadedTransferredThird-PartyDownloadedThird-PartyDownloadedTransferredTransferredTransferredTransferredTransferredThird-PartyDownloadedReadThird-PartyDownloadedComment2.0.0messagerelayed2.0.0messagerelayedfile:///C:/Users/jwilkinson!AppDatalLocallTemp/XPgrpwise/50913Cl9MDEDOMpo21in..11/30/2012
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 4.29




       AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN ENZACTA GROUP PLC AND CHIMAERON LTD
                              DATED 1ST APRIL 2000.


4th April 2000

Following a change of name, the "Company" name is now Enact Pharma PLC. All
references to Enzacta Group PLC and the "Company" now refer to Enact Pharma PLC.


Signed for both Parties by:


/s/ illegible                                   /s/ M.A. Atkinson
-----------------------------                   ---------------------------
for and on behalf of                            for and on behalf of
ENACT PHARMA PLC                                CHIMAERON LTD
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WESTERN DISTRICT

**COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA,**

**Respondent**

**v.**

**MARLIN ALAN BROWN, II,**

**Petitioner :** 

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**:**

**: No. 394 WAL 2015** 

**Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court** 

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW **, this 8th day of March, 2016, the Petition for Allow ance of Appeal is** 

DENIED

**.**

**Justice Eakin did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.** 

**Justice Donohue did not participate in the consideration or decision of this** 

**matter.**

**Justice Wecht did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.**
EXHIBIT 99.1



CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



I, W. Russell Smith III, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that the Annual Report of
Hartville Group, Inc. on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and that information contained in such 10KSB fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition and results of operations of Hartville Group, Inc.



By:

/s/    W. Russell Smith IIIName:

W. Russell Smith IIITitle:

Principal Executive Officer
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA DA 19 - 0262

_________________ MOUNTAIN WATER COMPANY,

Pl aint iff and Appellant,
v. MONTANA DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,

Defendant and Appellee, and CIT Y OF MISSOULA, a Montana municipal corporati on, Intervenor, Appellee ,

and Cross
- Appellant, and MISSOULA COUNTY,

Intervenor, Appellee , and Cross
- Appellant. O R D E R

_________________ 

### Pursuant to the Int ernal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for submission on briefs to the Court sitting en banc. The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to all counsel of r ecord and to the Honorable Le slie Halligan , District Judge . For the Co urt,

Electronically signed by: Mike McGrath Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

March 18 2020

03/18/2020

Case Number: DA 19-0262
# C_2015363EN.01004201.xml

| 3.11.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 363/42 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

3.11.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 363/42

---

Action brought on 28 August 2015 — Fontem Holdings 4 v OHIM (BLU ECIGS)

(Case T-511/15)

(2015/C 363/51)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Fontem Holdings 4 BV (Amsterdam, Netherlands) (represented by: A. Poulter, Solicitor)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘BLU ECIGS’ — Application for registration No 12 579 603

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 29 June 2015 in Case R 2697/2014-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | annul the decision of the Examiner dated 22 August 2014 for application No 12 579 603; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Examiner dated 22 August 2014 for application No 12 579 603;

| — | accept the application No 12 579 603 for registration. |
| --- | --- |

—

accept the application No 12 579 603 for registration.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Articles 7(1)(b) and 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Articles 7(1)(b) and 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

: CIVIL ACTION NOS.

:

JAQUAY, et al. : 02-3882

DAUSE : 02-3928

GETTO : 02-3946

HERSH, et al. : 02-4104

DELLOLIO : 02-4141

VARMER.et al. : 02-4200

BURNS, et al. : 02-4233

SEBESTYEN, et al. : 02-4262

DIXON, et al. : 02-4325

:

VS. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION, et al. :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of July, 2002, the Court having been previously

advised that the above action cannot proceed to trial and disposition because of the following

reason:

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending disposition of a related

action.

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending determination of

arbitration proceedings.

[ ] - Interlocutory appeal filed.

[ X ] - Other: Case is placed into suspense pending receipt of the Case

Transfer Order from the Judicial Panel on Multi District Litigation

transferring case to District of Minnesota..

Case 2:02-cv-04141-CG Document 2 Filed 07/15/2002 Page 1 of 2
It is

ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this action closed for statistical purposes and

place the matter in the Civil Suspense File, and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction; and that the case be

restored to the trial docket when the action is in a status so that it may proceed to final

disposition; this order shall not prejudice the rights of the parties to this litigation.

BY THE COURT:

________________________________________

Clifford Scott Green, Judge

Case 2:02-cv-04141-CG Document 2 Filed 07/15/2002 Page 2 of 2