alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 942 

Expressing support for the honoring of the City Commission of the City 

of Lauderdale Lakes, Broward County, Florida. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 14, 2018 

Mr. HASTINGS (for himself, Ms. WASSERMAN SCHULTZ, Ms. WILSON of Florida, Mr. DEUTCH, and Ms. FRANKEL of Florida) submitted the following 

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing support for the honoring of the City Commission 

of the City of Lauderdale Lakes, Broward County, Florida. 

Whereas the City of Lauderdale Lakes, Broward County, 

Florida, was incorporated on June 22, 1961; 

Whereas the City is located in central Broward County on 

United States Highway 441; 

Whereas originally popular as a retirement area for northeasterners, notably New Yorkers and those of the Jewish 

faith, the population, toward the end of the 20th century, 

grew to include those with Caribbean and African-American heritage; 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 942 IH 

Whereas the current population of the City numbers approximately 35,000 people, consisting of approximately 15,000 

households; 

Whereas, in 2014, by vote of the City electorate, the government of the City was changed to provide for a governing 

body of five elected officials, including a Mayor elected 

at-large; 

Whereas, in November 2016, the City held municipal elections and the electorate voted into office five women of 

color making the City of Lauderdale Lakes the only city 

in the State of Florida with a City Commission composed 

entirely of women; and 

Whereas the current City Commission consists of the Mayor, 

Hazelle Rogers, Vice Mayor Beverly Williams, and City 

Commissioners Sandra Davey, Gloria Lewis, Veronica 

Edwards Phillips: Now, therefore, be it 

1 Resolved, that the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) recognizes the City of Lauderdale Lakes, 

3 Broward County, Florida, for having elected the 

4 first-ever city governing body of its size that is com5 prised solely of women of color; and 

6 (2) commends the City of Lauderdale Lakes, 

7 Broward County, Florida, for its progressive goals of 

8 minority representation by both women and people 

9 of color. 

Æ 


pbinns on DSK79D2C42PROD with BILLS
No. 49548.

#### Protests 88601-K, etc., of Saul N. Ades et al. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
**Exhibit 99.3****Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Compliance**The Board of DirectorsPrincipal Financial Group, Inc.Principal Life Insurance CompanyWe have examined management’s assertion, included in the accompanying report titled *Report ofManagement on Compliance*, that Principal Financial Group, Inc. and Principal Life Insurance Company(collectively, the “Company”) complied with the specified standards identified in Exhibit A to the*Report of Management on Compliance*(the “specified standards”) with respect to the secured notesissued by Principal Life Income Fundings Trust 2005-84 during the year ended December 31, 2005.Management is responsible for the Company’s compliance with those specified standards. Ourresponsibility is to express an opinion on management’s assertion about the Company’s compliancebased on our examination. Our examination was conducted in accordance with attestation standards established by thePublic Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and, accordingly, included examining, ona test basis, evidence about the Company’s compliance with the specified standards and performingsuch other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that ourexamination provides a reasonable basis for our opinion. Our examination does not provide a legaldetermination on the Company’s compliance with the specified standards.In our opinion, management’s assertion that Principal Financial Group, Inc. and Principal LifeInsurance Company complied with the aforementioned specified standards during the year endedDecember 31, 2005, is fairly stated, in all material respects. /s/ Ernst & Young LLPDes Moines, Iowa
Federal Housing Finance Agency

Constitution Center

400 7th Street, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20219 

Telephone: (202) 649-3800 

Facsimile: (202) 649-1071 

www.fhfa.gov 

FHLBank System at 100 Roundtable:

Access to the FHLBank System 

Monday, March 20, 2023 | 9:00 – 10:00 a.m. AT 

1. What are the opportunities and challenges affecting affordable housing development and 

community development initiatives in Alaska? Please discuss challenges occurring in Alaskan 

communities as a result of climate change. 

2. What role do you see the FHLBank System playing in supporting affordable, equitable, 

sustainable, and resilient housing and homeownership in Alaska? 

3. What role do you see the FHLBank System playing in supporting community development in 

Alaska? Where does economic development factor in? 

4. How might the FHLBank System play a larger role in addressing these challenges? Are there any 

barriers that prevent the FHLBank System from working more effectively in Alaska? If so, how 

might those barriers be overcome? 

5. Are there particular populations, market segments, or purposes that the FHLBank System may be 

well positioned to support? 

6. What should the FHLBanks’ mission-related programs look like? Are there new programs that 

the FHLBank System should consider? What would be key features? 

7. What specific challenges or opportunities did the pandemic bring about in Alaska and how might 

the FHLBank System be of benefit in addressing them? 

To submit in advance: 

Are there additional gaps that the FHLBank System can help fill in your community? 

• What are critical considerations you would recommend to enhance the FHLBank System role in 

addressing affordable housing and other community needs in Alaska? 

• How can the FHLBank System further support the housing and economic development needs of 

Alaska Native communities? What specific challenges must be considered? 

• Are there structural changes to the FHLBank System (e.g., consolidation, change in membership) 

that should be considered to enhance role the System plays?
EXHIBIT 32.2





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Quarterly Report of Bayou City Exploration, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Stephen C. Larkin, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





1)           The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2)           The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company





/s/ Stephen C. Larkin


Stephen C. Larkin


Chief Financial Officer





August 16, 2010
Exhibit 32(i)

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Dialog Group,
Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Peter V. DeCrescenzo, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company,
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, that:

      (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
or15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: November 18, 2005                /s/ Peter V. DeCrescenzo
                                        -----------------------------
                                        Peter V. DeCrescenzo, CEO
FILED

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

May 21, 2008

THOMAS K. KAHN

CLERK

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT

________________________

No. 07-12848

________________________

D. C. Docket No. 06-61100 CV-PCH

SARA EVANS, DONALD ALEX EVANS,

on behalf of Emily Evans, a child and Jacob

Evans, a child, individually,

Plaintiffs-Appellants,

Cross-Appellees,

versus

UNKNOWN AGENTS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN

AND FAMILIES, individually as agents of the DCF,

Defendant-Appellee,

M.D. JOHN WRIGHT,

individually as an agent of the Child Protection Team,

M.D. JASON SCHULMAN,

individually as an agent of the Child Protection Team,

MARSHA CHRISTIE,

individually as an agent of the Child Protection Team,

Defendants-Appellees,

Cross-Appellants.

________________________

Appeals from the United States District Court

for the Southern District of Florida

_________________________

(May 21, 2008)
All pending motions are denied. 1

2

Before ANDERSON, HULL and SILER,* Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

After oral argument and careful consideration, we conclude that the

judgment of the district court is due to be affirmed, although on grounds different

from those relied upon by the district court. We need not address whether or not,

or to what extent, any of the defendants are protected by absolute immunity,

because we conclude that all defendants are entitled to qualified immunity. The

allegations of the complaint set out ample justification for the actions taken by each

of the defendants. To the extent that the complaint alleges actions which might

have been actionable – e.g., the allegations of reliance upon false evidence – the

allegations of the complaint are purely conclusory, without any support in specific

factual allegations. Accordingly, we conclude that none of the defendants

committed any constitutional violation, and we readily conclude that all of the

defendants are protected by qualified immunity.

AFFIRMED.1

____________________

*Honorable Eugene Siler, Jr., United States Circuit Judge for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by 

designation.
March 10, 1954

No. 57918.

Suit 4731.

#### Bjelland, Lange & Co,, Inc. v. United States.

C, D. 1383 affirmed November 24, 1953. C. A. D. 545.
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of TenFold Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jonathan E. Johnson, III, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|/s/JONATHAN E. JOHNSON IIIJonathan E. Johnson, III Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial OfficerAugust 14, 2002 |  | 
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |  | 

---

QuickLinks
EXHIBIT 14

                                     INFICON

                       Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

This Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the "Code") is intended to articulate
and make publicly available a general statement regarding INFICON's (the
"Company" or "INFICON") expectations about the business conduct of the Company's
directors, officers and employees. This Code is not exclusive: Company personnel
shall also be subject to other applicable policies of the Company as those
policies may from time to time be implemented. This Code applies to the Company
and all of its subsidiaries and other business entities controlled by it
worldwide.

It is the policy of INFICON to conduct all Company business in accordance with
high standards of integrity and in compliance with all applicable laws and
regulations.

Accordingly, all directors, officers and employees of INFICON are required to:

      1.    Act with honesty and integrity, ethically handling actual and
            apparent conflicts of interests between their personal interests and
            the Company's interests.

      2.    The principal executive officer and senior financial officers, and
            others responsible for the preparation, evaluation and dissemination
            of INFICON's financial information, shall provide full, fair,
            accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in reports and
            documents INFICON files with, or submit to, the SWX Swiss Exchange
            and the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, and in
            public communications made by INFICON.

      3.    Comply with applicable laws, rules and regulations of federal,
            state, and provincial and local governments, and other appropriate
            private and public regulatory agencies. All directors, officers and
            employees of INFICON are expected to use good judgment and common
            sense in seeking to comply with the foregoing and to ask for
            appropriate advice in the event of uncertainty.

      4.    Seek guidance and promptly report any evidence of a violation of
            this Code to his or her supervisor or, if appropriate, to the Audit
            Committee of the INFICON Board of Directors, attention to Dr. Thomas
            Staehlin, Postfach 2879, St. Jakobs-Strasse 7, CH-4002 Basel,
            Switzerland. Calls, detailed notes and/or emails will be dealt with
            confidentially.

The Company will not allow any retaliation against anyone who acts in good faith
in reporting any such violation. Directors, officers and employees who violate
this Code will be subject to appropriate discipline, up to and including
dismissal from the Company and prosecution under the law. The Board of Directors
shall have the sole and absolute discretion and authority to approve any
deviation or waiver from this Code for executive officers and directors. Any
change in or waiver of this Code shall be promptly disclosed through a filing
with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
*The Honorable Pasco M. Bowman stepped down as Chief Judge of the United

States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit at the end of the day on April 23, 1999.

He has been succeeded by the Honorable Roger L. Wollman.

**The Honorable Andrew W. Bogue, United States District Judge for the District

of South Dakota, sitting by designation.

United States Court of Appeals

FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT

___________

No. 98-3455

___________

Jalayne S. Noonan, *

*

Appellant, *

* Appeal from the United States 

v. * District Court for the Southern

* District of Iowa.

IASD Health Services Corp., doing *

business as Blue Cross Blue Shield of * [UNPUBLISHED]

Iowa, *

*

Appellee. *

___________

 Submitted: April 21, 1999

Filed: April 28, 1999

___________

Before BOWMAN,* Chief Judge, FAGG, Circuit Judge, and BOGUE,** District Judge.

___________

PER CURIAM.

Jalayne S. Noonan appeals the district court's adverse grant of summary

judgment in Noonan's coverage-related dispute with the insurer for her employer's
-2-

group health benefit plan. A review of the record and the parties' briefs shows the

district court's decision is clearly correct. We also conclude that an extended

discussion will serve no useful purpose. We thus affirm on the basis of the district

court's memorandum opinion and order. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

Attest:

CLERK, U.S. COURT OF APPEALS, EIGHTH CIRCUIT.
# Map            Pakistan. 9-73.
N O T FO R PUB L ICAT IO N UNITED STATES C OUR T OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH C IR C UIT In the M atte r of: C LIVE AND YOLANDA PAC E, C LIVE PAC E a

n d YOLANDA PAC E, Plaintiffs - Appe lla nts, v. B ANK OF AM E R IC A, N.A.; e t a l., De fe nda

nts - Appe lle e s. No. 13-16602 D.C . No. 2:13-c v-00339-JC M GW F M EM O R ANDUM *

Appe a l from

the Unite d

Stat e s Distric t C ourt for the Distric t of Ne v a da Jam e s C . M aha

n, Distric t Judge , Pre siding Subm itte d Oc tobe r 20, 2015 * * San Fran c isc o , C a lifornia B e fore : THOM AS, C hie f Judge and REINHAR DT a nd M c KEOW

N , C irc uit Judge s . 

# FIL E D OCT 23 2015 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U. S. CO URT O F APPEALS

* This disposition is not a ppropria te for public at ion a

nd is not pre c e de nt e xc e pt a s provide d

by 9th C ir. R . 36-3. ** The pa

ne l una nim ously c onc lude s this c a se is suita ble for de c ision without oral a

rgum e nt. Se e Fe d. R . App. P. 34(a)(2).C ha

pte r 11 de btors C live and Yola nda Pa c e a ppe a l the distric t

c o urt's a ffirm anc e of the ba

nkruptc y c ourt's sum

m ary judgm e nt in the i r a dve rsary proc e e ding a ga inst JPM orga n C ha se B a

nk, N.A., a

nd othe r de fe n da

nts, se e king quie t titleto re a l prope rty and a de c la ra tion tha t de fe n da nts' loa ns on theprope rtie s we re unse c ure d. W e have jurisdic tion ove r this a ppe a l pursua

nt to 28 U.S.C . § 1291, a nd we a ffirm . B e c a

use the pa rtie s a re fam ilia r with thefa c ts a

n d proc e dura l history , we ne e d not re c ount it he re . The Pa c e s prim arily

argue tha t JPM orga

n a nd B ank of Am e ric a

do not ha ve va lid c la im s be c a

use the y fa ile d to produc e origina l prom issory note s a nd de e ds of trust. Howe ve r, JPM orga n a nd B ank of Am e ric a

file d c e rtifie d

c opie s of the note s and de e ds a

nd m a de the origina ls a

va ila ble to the Pa c e s at he arings a nd se ttle m e nt c onfe re nc e s. The Pa c e s a lle ge tha

t the note s a

nd de e d s a

re now inva lid be c a

use the y we re pre v iously

split. W e find it unne c e ssa ry to de c ide whe the r the note s a nd de e ds we re in fa c t split be c a

use the fa c t re m a ins tha

t the y are c urre ntly

re unite d in the c are of the de fe nda

nt ba nks. Pe r Ede lste in v . Bank of N e w York Me llon , 286 P.3d 249, 252 (Ne v. 2012), sepa rating a note and de e d of trust doe s not re nde r e ithe r instrum e nt irre pa

ra bly void. Se e also In re Montie r th , 354 P.3d 648, 651 (Nev. 2015).The Pa c e s ’ s re m a i ning a rgum e nts de pe nd on the ir first. B e c a use we hold tha

t the re are no ge nuine issue s of m ate ria l fa c t a s to theva lidity of JPM orga

n a nd B ank of Am e ric a ’ s c l a im s, we a c c ordingly hold tha t the Pa c e s ha

ve not e sta

blishe d a ge n uine issue of m ate ria l fa c t re ga rding the ir quie t titlec l a im . AFFIRM E D.
No. 53933.

#### Armand Schwab & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 148461-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
1 Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be

published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4. -1- United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit 

## FILED April 21, 2003 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

_________________________ No. 02-11009 SUMMARY CALENDAR

_________________________ NELSON TOMAS ZAMBRANO

Petitioner - Appellant

v. L. E. FLEMING, Warden, Federal Medical Center – Fort Worth

Respondent - Appellee

______________________________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Forth Worth Division

(4:02-CV-672-A)

______________________________________________________________________________ Before REYNALDO G. GARZA, HIGGINBOTHAM, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: 1 Nelson Tomas Zambrano, federal prisoner # 28146-004, appeals the district court’s judgement construing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition as a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion and dismissing it. Zambrano argues that the district court erred in construing his petition as a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion and that 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of his detention. Zambrano has not shown that he is entitled to seek relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241-2-

based on the savings clause of 28 U.S.C. § 2255 as he has not shown that any of his claims rely on a retroactively applicable Supreme Court decision. See Reyes-Requena v. United States , 243 F.3d 893, 904 (5th Cir. 2001). Because Zambrano is challenging the validity of his underlying conviction, the district court correctly construed his petition as a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. See Tolliver v. Dobre , 211 F.3d 876, 877 (5th Cir. 2000). Zambrano acknowledges that he filed a previous 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion challenging his conviction. He has not obtained authorization from the appropriate court of appeals for filing a successive 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. Accordingly, the district court did not err in dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. Zambrano’s appeal is without arguable merit and is DISMISSED as frivolous. Howard v. King , 707 F.2d 215, 219-20 (5th Cir. 1983); 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2. APPEAL DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS.
# C_2015406EN.01003102.xml

| 7.12.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 406/31 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.12.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 406/31

---

Action brought on 13 May 2015 — Vince v OHIM (ELECTRIC HIGHWAY)

(Case T-315/15)

(2015/C 406/32)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Dale Vince (Gloucestershire, United Kingdom) (represented by: B. Longstaff, barrister)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘ELECTRIC HIGHWAY’ — Application for registration No 010655819

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 3 March 2015 in Case R 1442/2014-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | allow the applicant’s application for the mark to proceed in full to registration; |
| --- | --- |

—

allow the applicant’s application for the mark to proceed in full to registration;

| — | order OHIM to pay its own costs and those of the applicant. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay its own costs and those of the applicant.

Pleas in law

| — | Incorrect interpretation of the meaning of the mark in relation to Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Incorrect interpretation of the meaning of the mark in relation to Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Incorrect interpretation of the relevant services in Class 39; |
| --- | --- |

—

Incorrect interpretation of the relevant services in Class 39;

| — | The meaning of the mark asserted by the Board does not describe the services in any event; |
| --- | --- |

—

The meaning of the mark asserted by the Board does not describe the services in any event;

| — | Incorrect application of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Incorrect application of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---