Trial No 2OO5-CI-18884

Appeal KO.04-15-00012-CV

JOHN E. RODARTE SR-, IN THE FOURTH

Affiant, Appellant, Plaintiff, -O51^

In Propia Persona ., <**

vs OF APPEALS^ATT

BEXAR COUNTY,TEXAS,SHERIFF J"

RALPH LOPEZ,ET AL, L> '..'•"■ Appellees,Defendants SAN ANTON 10,.TEXAST

kl> '■■''

notice of appeal,

motion for appellate record,

with brief in support

To The Honorable Justices:

Now comes John E. Rodarte Sr .,Affiant,Appellant,Plaintiff *an3 on

this date of January 23,2015 completes this document,for the aoove

styled and numbered cause of action,and will show the followinq:

hearinq was held on October 20,2014 concerning Bill Of Review

Motion by the plaintiff and was dismissed on the same date.

As per this court's correspondence,dated January 09,2015 received

on January 21,2015 which offers evidence of questionable mail handl

ing ,pardon,correspondence dated January 12,2015,is still received

rather lateAppellant,Rodarte,has yet to receive trial court order,concern

ing submission for new trial,due to among other things,a hearing

held in violation of plaintiff's request for jury trial and

settinq on the jury docket of September 24,2015 as afforded by the

pleadinqs and arguments presented by the plaintiff,and in further

violation of Texas Rules Of Civil Procedure,245...,in place ot the

word noncontested,plaintiff will offer the word contested in its

place,unless the trial court would like to explain how it heard

plaintiff's case on October 20,2014 clearly in violation of rule

245,in which this case is highly contested,thus,may not be disposed

of at any timeAgain,said hearinq on October 20,2014 and dismissal,is in further

violation of Rules Of Civil Procedure,247,every suit shall be tried

when it is called no cause which has been set upon the trial

docket for the date set,except by agreement of the parties.-.,this

is where trial court committed grave error,the court,took it

1-
Rodarte's Notice Of Appeal,Appeal Record,(January 23,2015)

Themself/well with the judge making the determination,to will

fully call hearing,other than the trial by jury date,and without

any notice or agreement known to the plaintiff,to remove the case

from the jury docket in contested case,in which,all issues were

set for jury's determination. This denies plaintiff Rodarte,his

right to due process,a right to jury trial as afforded by the

7th and 14th Amendments of the U.S. Constitution.

Plaintiff Rodarte,will state,that the above mentioned case,should

be subjected to the rigors of Title VII Civil Rights Act Of 1871,due

to the questionable issues concerning this case on two aspects. One/

the defendants failure in taking the initiative in taking responsi

bility for clear injury to plaintif,for failing to provide safe

transportation,causing verified back injury. Two,for doing all in

its power,to defend and use the law,to avoid responsibility and

liability to plaintiff Rodarte. The defendants,had offered twice,

to settle,when the amount of settlement that was offered by the

defendants is compared to other similar injuries,the defendants,

only insulted plaintiff by trying to make an offer,that could havy

been made out of someone back pocket or coat pocket. Such an insult,

did one very important thing,it offered evidence of liability and

responsibility,thus case more than ready for jury trial.

The very same thing occurred on December 05,2011 when the case

became subjected to the very identical game on October 20,2014.

As the caselaw applied by the plaintiff in his Bill Of Review/it

should not only convince this court of what is correct according to

the law,but what it must do according to the law and reinstate the

case to its original status,otherwise,plaintiff's fundamental and

substantial rightS/as well as the constitutional violations will

forever stay injured just as his back is,due to unsafe transportation

and denial of law.

Therefore,plaintiff Rodarte,motions for full appellate record/

this way this court,may see,not only the clear concealment of pro

per application of law by the defendants and their constituents,the

denial of lawful relief to the plaintiff,medical/monetary/its just

pitiful. This pursuant to T.R.A.P. rules 33.1;20.1;21.3;25.1;26.1(a)

(l);34.5;34.6;35.1(a);35.3(a)(l)(2). Respectf^^^bmitted,
Rodarte's Notice Of Appeal/Appellate /record,(January 23/2015)

CONCLUSION

Mr. Rodarte,simply will plead/the record,upon review with

lawful eye/will uncover volumes/and coincide with Rodarte's issues

ever since the December 01/2005 filing of this civil case.

Respect fiillHTDone

PRAYER

Plaintiff Rodarte/makes his petition known to God in the highest;

that the honorable Fourth Court Of Appeals,grant the relief souqht.

Respect foJ^lw Done,

C7

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

Thjis is to certify/that true and correct copy of this foregoing

document,has been sent to Mr. Clarkson F. Brown,Assistant District

Attorney,at 101 West Nueva St.,Suite 5049 San Antonio,Texas 78205

Executed On This January 23,2015 Respectfully Done

.R.j/j -r

01/23/2015
LLJtt: BiiLo^i- aiijti; aiJb

NHMus NODftii IL, JUBN Si;

uc* LUUS L.J IUI Ii3Ei<j

.,.....,-., bHL; U. iSCd IUi liUf_L

bl'ilH DLP: JU. 4l: tol'l H^U DHL.

MDNiH HiehbBl bHL-fiNCE n, ,,._,,., flUN

iNLNi ui Lhi iL JLJbi k,l 01 *:£*. is

i. Uuhn .- ,i_, ._j, ,.. .il.; r.j.',.,

i^ib LLJwh j,LK; .... LL LLLi ,l_., _.■ iriiilbLN .. Ui/t

Bi_blNNl!\u PLfVlUD: ,3 i31 J.-<

1 / 14 Jl« hj

-. -I j. .j

ti. &W Ui ,.... .ib.

j,bL:..i..6 LCI .■.-■■_. UUr 6,

lUUtbl DHLRNUU IUTHL DE.POiiIt£j

., ..

;Ui_i. LtLbuHll j. UN

i. .,..„.. U'. -■ -■

STftTE Qi L*fi5jlL1

'"--^ olCf^'■ -• ^Q/XUL£l/ltJ[.- ZQ}^- ;LHIH i i >r- lu LJU .,.., ,-,.-),■.!.■ uNhLTLI^LIj UJ SJl Ui i'JL ul INi LJhiiH ION UUl-J Th UUMPUILS DriTHtiNbt. RLGflfilJiNU (IL UI-F LNDLh Hi-Ul i. Mi jiu;

H'l lli_i_P Pi LWD EN'ILH NbLX ll)UJ NUflbl U,> -_■!.. NU

IN

-,., ,■

R.HARRISON

NOTARY PUBLIC.

STATE OF TEXAS

". '":'

lh