alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
QuickLinks
 -- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

Exhibit 4.5  



	

	 
	 	 

	Notice of Grant of Stock Option	 	Axonyx Inc.

500 Seventh Avenue, 10th Floor

New York, New York 10018
	

	Wolfe Axelrod Weinberger Associates LLC

317 Madison Avenue, Suite 515

New York, NY 10017	 	 





        You
have been granted an option ("Option") to buy Axonyx Inc. ("Axonyx") common stock as follows: 



	 
	 	 

	 	Stock Option Grant No.	 	101
	 	Date of Grant	 	May 21, 2003
	 	Stock Option Agreement	 	Non-Statutory/Non-Plan (Attachment 1)
	 	Option Price per Share	 	$2.80
	 	Total Number of Shares Granted	 	150,000
	 	Expiration Date/Time	 	May 20, 2008
	





 
  VESTING SCHEDULE    
    



	On or After
 
	 	Stock Available

For Exercise
 
	 	Cumulative Amount

of Stock Available

for Exercise
 

	

	7/1/03	 	8,335	 	8,334
	8,333 vest on the first of each month 8/1/03 to 12/1/03	 	50,000
	1/1/04	 	8,335	 	58,335
	8,333 vest on the first of each month 2/1/04 to 6/1/04	 	100,000
	7/1/04	 	4,200	 	104,200
	4,200 vest on the first of each month 8/1/04 to 5/1/05	 	146,200
	6/1/05	 	3,800	 	150,000





        By
your signature and Axonyx's signature below, you and Axonyx agree that this Option is granted outside of the Axonyx 1998 and 2000 Stock Option Plans, and that Optionee has been
provided with a copy of the Axonyx Business Plan and access to all of Axonyx's regulatory filings. 


Attachments:  


	1.
	Stock
Option Agreement.



	2.
	Information
Memorandum that describes, among other things, the federal income tax consequences of exercising your options. 




	

AXONYX INC.	
 	

OPTIONEE
	

By:	
 	

/s/ Michael R. Espey
 Michael R. Espey

Vice President and Secretary	
 	

/s/ Donald C. Weinberger
 Donald C. Weinberger

Managing Partner

Wolfe Axelrod Weinberger











QuickLinks


VESTING SCHEDULE
_______________________________________ __ Michigan Supreme Court 

# Order

Lansing, Michigan

February 27, 2006 Clifford W. Taylor,
Chief Justice

130000 Michael F. Cavanagh
Elizabeth A. Weaver Marilyn Kelly Maura D. Corrigan Robert P. Young, Jr. CHRISTOPER JAMES DONKERS, Stephen J. Markman, Plaintiff-Appellant, Justices

v SC: 130000 COA: 262852 Wayne CC: 02-236657-DM JODY LEE DONKERS, a/k/a JODY LEE ROSA, Defendant-Appellee.

________________ _______________ __________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 21, 2005 order of the Court of Appeals is consid ered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented s hould be reviewed by this Court.

s0221 I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Mi chigan Supreme Cour t, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

February 27, 2006

Clerk
No. 50317.

#### Protests 57246-K, etc., of Bailey & Griffin, Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the ease within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83, decided February 5, 1945.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries. The protests were sustained to this extent.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

 

Douglas Pennoyer, Jr. 

 vs. 

Marriott Hotel Services, Inc. t/a and d/b/a Philadelphia 

Marriott Hotel; Marriott International, Inc.; Philadelphia 

Market Street Hotel Corp.; Philadelphia Market Street HMC 

Hotel Limited Partnership; Philadelphia Market Street 

Marriott Hotel LP; New Market Street, LP; HMC Market 

Street, LLC; Philadelphia Market Street Hotel II, L.P.; Market 

Street Host, LLC; and Market Street Marriott, LLC 

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

:

 CIVIL ACTION NO. 03-5060 

 

OFFER OF JUDGMENT

 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 68, Defendant hereby offers judgment in favor of the 

Plaintiff in this action in the amount of FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS AND 00/100 ($5,000.00) in full and 

complete resolution of all claims in this matter. 

This offer must be accepted within ten (10) days after service or it is deemed withdrawn. This offer is made 

for purposes specified in FRCP 68 and shall only by construed as a compromised settlement and not an admission 

of the value of this case. 

 DATED this day of , 2004. 

 MARSHALL, DENNEHEY, WARNER, 

 COLEMAN & GOGGIN 

 BY: SR1450

 STEPHANIE K. RAWITT 

Identification Number: 76892 

1845 Walnut Street, 19th Floor 

Philadelphia, PA 19103 

(215) 575-2649 

 Attorney for All Defendants 

Case 2:03-cv-05060-JCJ Document 30 Filed 04/30/04 Page 1 of 1
H. Res. 710 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

January 22, 2018. 

Resolved, That the following named Member be, and is 

hereby, elected to the following standing committee of the 

House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON ETHICS: Mr. Ratcliffe. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
No. 60390.

protest 224741-K (New York).

#### Cosmos Shipping Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

The protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Department of Health and Human Services

###### National Institutes of Health

Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended, notice is hereby given of the following meeting.

The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), Title 5 U.S.C., as amended. The contract proposals and the discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial property such as patentable material, and personal information concerning individuals associated with the contract proposals, the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.

*Name of Committee:*                         National Institute on Drug Abuse Special Emphasis Panel; National Addiction and HIV Data Archive Program.                    

*Date:*                         December 1, 2023.                    

*Time:*                         1:00 p.m. to 3:00 p.m.                    

*Agenda:*                         To review and evaluate contract proposals.                    

*Place:*                         National Institute of Health, National Institute on Drug Abuse, 301 North Stonestreet Avenue, Bethesda, MD 20892 (Virtual Meeting).                    

*Contact Person:*                         Brian Stefan Wolff, Ph.D., Scientific Review Officer, Scientific Review Branch, Division of Extramural Research, National Institute on Drug Abuse, NIH, 301 North Stonestreet Avenue, MSC 6021, Bethesda, MD 20892, (301) 480-1448,                         *brian.wolff@nih.gov*.                    

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.277, Drug Abuse Scientist Development Award for Clinicians, Scientist Development Awards, and Research Scientist Awards; 93.278, Drug Abuse National Research Service Awards for Research Training; 93.279, Drug Abuse and Addiction Research Programs, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

Dated: November 2, 2023.

Melanie J. Pantoja, 

Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.

[FR Doc. 2023-24628 Filed 11-7-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4140-01-P
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 56 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 56

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                      January 24, 2017.
    Resolved, That the following named Members be, and are hereby, elected to 
the following standing committee of the House of Representatives:
    Committee on Ethics: Mr. Deutch, Ms. Clarke of New York, Mr. Polis, and Mr. 
Brown of Maryland.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

     I, Christine A. Herren, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer of
Innotrac Corporation (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350 as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)  the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended June
     30, 2005 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section
     13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Dated: August 12, 2005


                                        /s/ Christine A. Herren
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Christine A. Herren
                                        Senior Director and Controller
                                        (Principal Financial Officer and
                                        Principal Accounting Officer)
**Exhibit 31.1**
**CERTIFICATION**
     I, James L. Box, certify that:
     1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of ebank Financial Services, Inc.;
     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;
     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented inthis report;
     4. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have:
     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosurecontrols and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on suchevaluation; and
     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s most recent fiscal quarter(the small business issuer’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer’sinternal control over financial reporting;
     5. The small business issuer’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small business issuer’sauditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or personsperforming the equivalent functions):
     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the small businessissuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting.
Date: May 13, 2005         By:       /s/ James L. Box   James L. Box, President and Chief Executive Officer
Order entered December 22, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00868-CV

DON A. MITCHELL, Appellant

V.

FREESE & GOSS, PLLC, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 95th Judicial District Court

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. DC-14-08251

ORDER

We GRANT appellant’s December 18, 2015 unopposed second motion for an extension 

of time to file a reply brief. Appellant shall file a reply brief by JANUARY 11, 2016.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS 

JUSTICE
SECTION
302 CEO CERTIFICATION Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION I, Louis Greco, certify that: 1.
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10 - KSB of Sword
  Comp-Soft Corp.2.
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue
  statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
  make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
  statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
  this report;3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other
financial
  information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects
  the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small
  business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;4.
The small business issuers other certifying officer(s)
and I are
  responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
  procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the
  small business issuer and have:a)
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
such
  disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
  ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer, including
  its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
  entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
  prepared;b)
Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business
issuers disclosure
  controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
  the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
  the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; andc)
Disclosed in this report any change in the small business
issuers
  internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
  business issuers most recent quarter (the small business issuers fourth
  quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
  reasonably likely to materially effect the small business issuers internal
  control over financial reporting; and5.
The small business issuers other certifying officer(s)
and I have
  disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
  financial reporting, to the small business issuers auditors and the audit
  committee of the small business issuers board of directors (or persons
  performing the equivalent function):A) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design
  or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are
  reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuers ability to
  record, process, summarize and report financial information; andB) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
of other
  employees who have a significant role in the small business issuers internal
  controls over financial reporting. Dated: May 4, 2006 BY; /S/ Louis GrecoLous GrecoPresident(Principal Executive and Financial
Officer)
ACSBAcquavella, Chiarelli,
Shuster, Berkower &Co.,
LLP




517
      Route One
            1
      Penn PlazaIselin,
      New Jersey 08830
            36th
      Floor732.
      855.9600
            New
      York, NY 10119Fax:732.855.9559
            212.786.7510www.acsbco.com











Board of
Directors


Universal
Travel Group


5th Floor,
South Block, Building 11,


Shenzhen Software Park,


Zhongke
2nd
Road, Nanshan District,


Shenzhen,
PRC 518000





CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS








We
consent to the inclusion in the foregoing Registration Statement on Form S-3 our
report on Universal travel Group, dated February 22, 2010, relating to the
financial statement of Universal Travel Group as of December 31, 2009 and 2008
for the years then ended. We also consent to the reference to our firm under the
caption “Experts”.








Respectfully
submitted,




















/s/Acquavella,
Chiarelli, Shuster, Berkower & Co., LLP


New York,
NY


June 4,
2010











New
      York
            ·
            New
      Jersey
            ·
            Cayman
      Islands
Case 2:03-cv-05595-MMB Document 237 Filed 05/23/13 Page 1 of 1
No. 68651.

protests 311709-K and 58/16284 (New York).

#### Lafayette Brass Co., Inc., and The Durst Manufacturing Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of rotary lawn sprinklers or metal parts thereof similar in all material respects to those the subject of *The Durst Mfg. Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(50 CCPA 56, C.A.D. 820), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that

this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR . R. 47.5.4. United States Court of Appeals

Fifth Circuit 

## FILED June 9, 2006 Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-10148 Summary Calendar

DAVIE HARRISON, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus A. DOMINQUEZ, Doctor; NFN BAXTER; C. C. BELL, Warden; NFN FILLION; NFN SHORT; K. EVANS, LVN; H. LEDFORD, Officer; JESSIE CASTILLO, Officer; NFN BEACH, Captain; NFN GREMSLEY, Nurse; RICHARD J. ROUCH, Gray County District Attorney; JANIE COCKRELL, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, INSTITUTIONAL DIVISION; JOE NUNN, Assistant Warden, Defendants-Appellees.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas

USDC No. 2:02-CV-160

-------------------- Before JOLLY, DAVIS, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM: * Davie Harrison, Texas prisoner no. 696677, appeals the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action for failure to state a claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Harrison argues that the district court erred in dismissing his claim under FED . R. C IV . P. 12(b)(6) before issuing service of process and that the courtNo. 05-10148 -2- used the standard of 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Harrison’s argument fails because the district court dismissed his suit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 rather than F ED . R. C IV . P. 12(b)(6). Harrison also contends that defendants Dr. Dominguez and Nurse Evans failed to provide him with adequate medical care and that they were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical
needs. Harrison has failed to allege facts to establish deliberate indifference to a serious medical need as is required in order to proceed under the Eighth Amendment and 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Varnado v. Lynaugh , 920 F.2d 320, 321 (5th Cir. 1991). Harrison also argues that the district court erred in declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over his state law claims. Because the district court dismissed all of Harrison’s federal claims, the dismissal of the remaining state claims was not an abuse of discretion. Bass v. Parkwood Hosp. , 180 F.3d 234, 246 (5th Cir. 1999). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED. Harrison’s motions for a preliminary injunction pending appeal, a temporary restraining order, and request for relocation are
DENIED.
Document

EXHIBIT 10(f)(14)


Management Incentive Program for 2021 (2021 MIP)
Under the 2021 MIP, executive officers of the Company are eligible to receive performance related annual cash payments. Payments are, in general, only made if performance objectives established by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors (the “Committee”) are met.


The Committee approved target incentive opportunities for 2021, expressed as a percentage of base salary for each participating officer. The Committee also established overall threshold, target and maximum performance metrics and payout ranges for the 2021 MIP. Financial performance measures and weightings established by the Committee are: Absolute Revenue (unadjusted for currency) (weighted at one-third), Adjusted Operating Margin (weighted at one-third) and Free Cash Flow (weighted at one-third). Additionally, the Committee established an Environmental, Social and Governance payout modifier that allows the otherwise applicable performance-based payout to be increased or decreased by up to 10% of target, with the result not to exceed 200% of target. The Committee maintains the authority to increase or decrease an award based on individual performance.


Individual awards will be subject to the review and approval of the Committee following the completion of the 2021 fiscal year, with payment to be made within the first four months of 2022.
Before the First Division,

June 8, 1964

No. 68612.

protests 61/3528, etc. (New York).

#### Advance Pet Supply Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, G.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the-merchandise consists of plastic feeders or fountains similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 67011, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.