# C_2015178EN.01002101.xml

| 1.6.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 178/21 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

1.6.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/21

---

Action brought on 1 April 2015 — Abertis Infraestructuras and Abertis Telecom Satélites v Commission

(Case T-158/15)

(2015/C 178/21)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Abertis Infraestructuras, SA (Barcelona, Spain) and Abertis Telecom Satélites, SA (Madrid, Spain) (represented by: J. Buendía Sierra, M. Maragall de Gispert, M. Santa María Fernández, J. Panero Rivas, and A. Balcells Cartagena, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the General Court should:

| — | admit and uphold the grounds for annulment set out in this application; |
| --- | --- |

—

admit and uphold the grounds for annulment set out in this application;

| — | annul Article 1 of the contested decision in so far as it declares that the new administrative interpretation of Article 12 TRLIS adopted by the Spanish administration must be regarded as State aid which is incompatible with the internal market; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Article 1 of the contested decision in so far as it declares that the new administrative interpretation of Article 12 TRLIS adopted by the Spanish administration must be regarded as State aid which is incompatible with the internal market;

| — | annul Article 4.1 of the contested decision in so far as it requires the Kingdom of Spain to put an end to the alleged aid scheme as described in Article 1; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Article 4.1 of the contested decision in so far as it requires the Kingdom of Spain to put an end to the alleged aid scheme as described in Article 1;

| — | annul parts 2, 3, 4 and 5 of Article 4 of the contested decision in so far as they require the Kingdom of Spain to recover the amounts considered by the Commission to be State aid; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul parts 2, 3, 4 and 5 of Article 4 of the contested decision in so far as they require the Kingdom of Spain to recover the amounts considered by the Commission to be State aid;

| — | in the alternative, limit the scope of the recovery obligation imposed on the Kingdom of Spain in Article 4.2 of the contested decision in the same terms as in the First and Second Decisions; and |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, limit the scope of the recovery obligation imposed on the Kingdom of Spain in Article 4.2 of the contested decision in the same terms as in the First and Second Decisions; and

| — | order the Commission to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Commission to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The pleas in law and main arguments are similar to those put forward in Cases T-826/14 Spain v Commission and T-12/15 Banco Santander and Santusa v Commission.

Spain

Commission

Banco Santander and Santusa

Commission

The applicants claim, in particular, that the Commission erred in law in the legal classification of the measure as State aid, in the identification of the beneficiary of the measure and in the characterisation of the administrative interpretation as State aid distinct from that examined in the Commission’s decisions, and that it breached the principles of the protection of legitimate expectations, of estoppel and of legal certainty.

---