alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.1

WRITTEN STATEMENT OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer of Global Imaging Systems, Inc.
(the Company), each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge on the date hereof:



| | (a) | the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2006 filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
| | --- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



| | (b) | information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | --- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|                 |  |  |  |                                                     
|---------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------
|                 |  | 
|November 8, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ Thomas S. Johnson                               
|Date             |  |  |  | Thomas S. Johnson,                                  
|                 |  |  |  | Chairman and Chief Executive Officer                
|                 |  | 
|November 8, 2006 |  |  |  | /s/ Raymond Schilling                               
|Date             |  |  |  | Raymond Schilling,                                  
|                 |  |  |  | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 and is not being
filed as part of the Report or as a separate disclosure document. This certification shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) or otherwise subject to
liability under that section. This certification shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act except to the extent this Exhibit 32.1 is expressly and specifically
incorporated by reference in any such filing.

A signed original of this statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Global Imaging
Systems, Inc. and will be retained by Global Imaging Systems, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

STANFORD GLABERSON, et al. : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. :

:

COMCAST CORPORATION, et al. : NO. 03-6604

ORDER

AND NOW, this 26th day of October, 2016, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that an 

evidentiary hearing on (1) the Motion for Order Approving Allocation of Remainder of 

Attorneys Fee Award Between Co-Lead Counsel (Docket Entry 660) and (2) the Motion to 

Determine Fee Allocation Between Co-Lead Counsel (Docket Entry 662), shall take place on 

December 1, 2016 at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom 17B, United States Courthouse, 601 Market 

Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in aid of the Court’s resolution of these Motions, 

Counsel shall jointly prepare exhibits identifying which law firm(s) had primary responsibility 

for (1) preparing each pleading they have jointly submitted in this litigation; (2) taking or 

defending each deposition; (3) preparing or responding to other discovery; and (4) preparing and 

presenting each appearance in this Court and each appeal. Counsel are FURTHER ORDERED

to jointly submit a narrative description of each significant event in this litigation, identifying the 

role of each firm in that event.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Counsel shall individually provide the Court with an 

exhibit identifying the specific line items, if any, in each other’s lodestar billing records that 

Counsel contend are unreasonable or excessive in terms of the benefit conferred on the Class for 

Case 2:03-cv-06604-JP Document 674 Filed 10/27/16 Page 1 of 2
the time billed.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ John R. Padova

John R. Padova, J.

Case 2:03-cv-06604-JP Document 674 Filed 10/27/16 Page 2 of 2
Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, Edward F. Brennan, Ph.D., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of CryoCor, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements,
and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a) Designed such disclosure controls and
procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) Designed such internal control over
financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the
registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over
financial reporting; and

5. The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of
internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date: March 21, 2008



/s/    EDWARD F. BRENNAN,
PH.D.Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
No. 53906.

#### Morris J. Golombeck, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 148500-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

In accordance with stipulation that the merchandise consists of laurel leaves similar in all material respects to those the subject of *The Levy & Levis Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(23 Cust. Ct. 8, C. D. 1180), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
Exhibit
21.1





List of Subsidiaries - March
2008







Xfone,
Inc.




100% NTS
Communications, Inc.


100% NTS
Management Company, LLC


100%
Communications Brokers, Inc.


100% NTS
Construction Company


100% NTS
Telephone Company, LLC


100%
Midcom of Arizona, Inc.


100%
Garey M Wallace Company, Inc.




100% 
Xfone USA, Inc.


100% 
eXpeTel Communications, Inc.


100% 
Gulf Coast Utilities, Inc.




100 %
Story Telecom, Inc.


100%
Story Telecom Limited




100%
Swiftnet Limited


100%
Auracall Limited




100%
Equitalk.co.uk Limited




69% Xfone
018 Ltd.
<PAGE>


Exhibit 8

                                  SUBSIDIARIES

The following are our "significant subsidiaries", as that term is defined by
applicable rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission.


                                          Country of            Proportion of
Company Name                            Incorporation         Ownership Interest

Telenor Mobile Communications AS.......    Norway                  100.00%
Telenor Telecom Solutions AS...........    Norway                  100.00%
Telenor Mobil AS.......................    Norway                  100.00%
Dansk Mobile Holding AS................    Norway                  100.00%
EDB Business Partner ASA...............    Norway                   51.80%
Pannon GSM RT..........................   Hungary                  100.00%
Telenor Interkom Verwaltung GmbH.......   Germany                  100.00%
GrameenPhone Ltd.......................  Bangladesh                 51.00%
(Reap. Dec. 10609)

#### W. J. Byrnes & Co. a/c D. E. Sanford Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States

Entry No. 18238, etc.

(Decided October 29, 1963)

*Lawrence & Tuttle*for the plaintiffs.

*Jolm W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Wilson, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule “A,” attached hereto and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties hereto:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the attorneys for the parties hereto:

> 1. That the appeals for reappraisement set forth in Schedule “A” hereto attached and made a part hereof are limited to the merchandise appraised in unit values expressed in Belgian francs less 20%, plus export packing.

> 2. That the said merchandise consists of enamelware exported from Belgium and entered or withdrawn from Customs warehouse for consumption before the effective date of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956.

> 3. That at the time of exportation of the said merchandise to the United States, the prices at which such or similar merchandise was freely sold or offered for sale in the principal markets of Belgium in the usual wholesale *429quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for consumption in Belgium were the appraised unit values, plus 9% sales tax, less 40% discount, plus export packing as invoiced, except that as to entry 4351 of 8-23-55 included in Reap. Appeal No. R58/13939, the freely offered price was the appraised unit value plus 10% sales tax, less 40% discount, plus export packing as invoiced.

> 4. That at the time of exportation of the said merchandise to the United States,'there did not exist a higher export value as defined in Sec.'402a (d) of the Tariff Act as amended for such or similar merchandise.

> 5. That the appeals for reappraisement set forth in the attached Schedule “A” are submitted on this stipulation.

On. the agreed facts, I find and bold foreign value, as tbat value is defined in section 402(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved and that such values were the appraised unit values, plus 9 per centum sales tax, less 40 per centum discount, plus export packing as invoiced, except that, with respect to the merchandise covered by entry 4351 included in reappraisement appeal R58/13939 the value for said merchandise was the appraised unit value, plus 10 per centum sales tax, less 40 per centum discount, plus export packing as invoiced.

Judgment will issue accordingly.
No. 68649.

protests 61/10839, etc. (New York).

#### Lafayette Radio Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of various types of meters similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. G. *L. Mectronies, Inc., Arrow Sales, Inc.*(49 CCPA 111, C.A.D. 804), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
**Exhibit      32**

|   | 1.  | the                Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)                of                the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|--------|----------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |     |                                                                                                                                                                                              |
|   | 2.       | the                information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the                Company. |

|     March                30 , 2007 |   | **XFONE,                INC.**  BY:                /S/ Guy Nissenson ——————————————Guy                Nissenson President,                CEO, Treasurer, CFO,Principal                Accounting Officer & Director |
|--------------------------------------------------------|--------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Exhibit 12.1
**CERTIFICATION**
I, Jean-Bernard Lévy, Chief Executive Officer of Vivendi Universal S.A., certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Vivendi Universal S.A. (the“Registrant”); 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a materialfact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial informationincluded in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition,results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report; 4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:
 (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the Registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, ismade known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period inwhich this report is being prepared;  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant’s disclosure controls andprocedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this reportbased on such evaluation; and  (c) disclosed in this report any change in the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, theRegistrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our mostrecent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant’s auditorsand the audit committee of the Registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing theequivalent functions):
 (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design oroperation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely toadversely affect the Registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or otheremployees who have a significant role in the Registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting.        Date: June 29, 2005 /s/ Jean-Bernard Lévy   Jean-Bernard Lévy   Chief Executive Officer
No. 62408.

#### International Packers, Ltd. *v.*United States,

protests 287190-K/14754, etc., (New Orleans).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of meats, prepared or preserved, not specially provided for, similar in all material respects to the meat the subject of *United States*v. *Mercantil Distribuidora, S. A., et al.*(45 C. C. P. A. 20, C. A. D. 667), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

 _________________________________________

 Clerk

December 8, 2011

Order 

December 8, 2011

143934-39(174)

PATRICK MCCARTHY,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

SC: 143934-39

v COA: 293482 et al

Oakland CC: 2008-089426-NO

EDWARD SOSNICK, WENDY L. POTTS,

KEVIN M OEFFNER, RICHARD M LYNCH,

JEANNE STEMPIEN, KATHLEEN J.

MCCANN, THOMAS J RYAN, BARRY M

GRANT, MICHAEL J TALBOT, DIANE M

GARRISON, NANCY J DIEHL, RONALD F

ROSE, NANCY J GRANT, GOVERNOR OF

MICHIGAN, ATTORNEY GENERAL, and

OAKLAND COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT,

Defendants-Appellees. 

_____________________________________

On order of the Court, on its own motion, the Court finds that the repeated 

motions by Mr. McCarthy seeking disqualification of members of the Court on 

substantially identical grounds constitute frivolous and vexatious pleadings, the motion 

for disqualification filed October 19, 2011 is stricken and will not be subject to further 

consideration. MCR 2.114(E).
#### In re AMERICAN ACOUSTICS, Inc.

No. 6672a.

United States District Court D. New Jersey.

Nov. 30, 1948.

Larkey, Mareiniss & Snyder, by Barney Larkey, all of Newark, N. J., for Trustees.

*971Charles R. L. Hemmersley, of Newark, N. J., by Sol A. Liebman and George H. Feirberg, both of New York City, for Reconstruction Finance Corporation.

Brady & Daly, of Newark, N. J., (Galen B. Hall, of Newark, N. J., of counsel), for petitioner Clifford A. King.

FAKE, Chief Judge.

The issues herein arise on an order to show cause why certain property, consisting of non-defective acoustic material or the value thereof, in the hands of the Trustee, should not be turned over to the petitioner, Clifford A. King.

Petitioner is engaged in the building and supply business in the City of New Orleans, Louisiana. In the year 1946 he purchased a total of 800 bags of softone plaster from American Acoustics, of Key-port, a corporation of New Jersey, for which he paid in full. Before it was consumed, and while there was still a supply on hand, it was found that the material as furnished was not suitable because of some defect in its manufacture. A representative of the corporation instructed the petitioner to return the defective plaster. On March 12, 1947, the material was shipped back to the Corporation. On March 20, 1947, an involuntary petition, under Chapter X of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C.A. § 501 et seq., was filed in this Court. Trustees were appointed and ordered, by the Court, to continue the business in reorganization. On April 2, 1947, an offer to replace the defective material was made by an employee of the Trustee. Petitioner now claims that he is entitled to payment for the material returned, or a return of non-defective material which will replace that which he surrendered. The fact that the shipment was in transit, at the time of the filing of the petition under Chapter X proceedings, is of no moment since it was not stopped in transitu. If he has a claim against the Debtor it is as a general creditor only.

The Trustee is not bound by the unauthorized act of the employee, since this would, in effect, be permitting the Trustee to do that which, by law, he is prohibited from doing; that is, to prefer one creditor over another. The Debtor, through its Trustee, was and still is willing to return the defective merchandise which the petitioner returned. This would place him in the position in which he found himself pri- or to the time he returned the goods.

The prayer of the petition is denied.
No. 57909.

protest 207614-K (Galveston).

#### R. W. Smith *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that' the merchandise consists of seamless steel oil-well casings similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Winkler-Koch Engineering Co.*(41 C. C. P. A. 121, C. A. D. 540), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained. ^
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

BANK EXPRESS INTERNATIONAL : CIVIL ACTION

:

 v. :

:

KANG, d/b/a BANKCARD SERVICE, :

et al. : NO. 02-4076 

ORDER

AND NOW, this 15th day of January, 2003, upon

consideration of defendants' motion to dismiss and strike the

amended complaint and plaintiff's response, and in accordance

with the foregoing memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN

PART;

2. This action is TRANSFERRED to the United States

District Court for the Northern District of California; and

3. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this action

statistically.

 BY THE COURT:

 _____________________

 Stewart Dalzell, J.

Case 2:02-cv-04076-SD Document 11-2 Filed 01/15/2003 Page 1 of 1