alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Blue Ridge Energy, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Norman
G. Haisler, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

      (1)   The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2)   The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ Norman G. Haisler
----------------------------------
Norman G. Haisler
Sr. Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
August 13, 2004
Printed on 100% recycled/recyclable paper with 100% post

- consumer fiber and process chlorine free.
Customer Service Hotline: 1

- 800

- 438

- 2474 1/12/15

Mr. David K. Paylor Virginia Department of Environmental Quality

629 East Main Street Richmond, Virginia 23219

Dear Director Paylor :

On December 22, 2014

, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) received a revision to

the Virginia State Implementation Plan (SIP) from the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality (VADEQ) pertain ing to the conflict of interest requirements of Clean Air Act section 128

. EPA has

determined that the submittal s are administratively and technically co mplete, and is reviewing the

submittals to prepare a Direct Final Rulemaking ( DFR ) action.

If members of your staff have any questions, they may direct them to Ms. Ellen Schmitt , Office of Air Program Planning, at (215) 814

- 5787 , or schmitt

. ellen @epa.gov. She is the principal contact for this rulemaking.

Sincerely,

/s/

David L. Arnold

, Acting Director

Air Protection Division

cc: Michael Dowd, Air Division Director Virginia Department of Environmental Quality
EXHIBIT 10.1

**ACCOUNTANTS’ CONSENT**

The Board of DirectorsGiven Imaging Ltd.

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the registration statement (No.333-73732) on Form S-8 of Given Imaging Ltd. (the “Company”) of our report dated February 12, 2003, with respect to the consolidated balance sheets of the Company and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three year period ended December 31, 2002, which report appears in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2002.

 

|                                                                            |   |   |   |
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------|--------|--------|--------|
| /s/ Somekh Chaikin                                                              |   |   |        |
| Somekh ChaikinCertified Public Accountants (Isr.)A member of KPMG International |   |   |   |

April 7, 2003

 

----
**EXHIBIT 31.2**I, Robert D. Burr, certify that:1. I have reviewed this 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2007 of Bayou City Exploration,Inc.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included inthis report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presentedin this report; 4. The small business issuer’s  certifying officer(s) are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange ActRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small business issuer and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosurecontrols and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the small business issuer, including its consolidatedsubsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly duringthe period in which this report is being prepared;  (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer’s disclosure controlsand procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness ofthe disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by thisreport based on such evaluation;  (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer’s internalcontrol over financial reporting that occurred during the small business issuer’s mostrecent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer’s fourth quarter in the case of anannual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the small business issuer’s internal control over financial reporting; and5. The small business issuer’s certifying officer(s) have disclosed, based on ourmost recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the small businessissuer’s auditors and the audit committee of the small business issuer’s board of directors(or persons performing the equivalent function): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operationof internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the small business issuer’s ability to record, process, summarize and reportfinancial information; and  (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employeeswho have a significant role in the small business issuer’s internal controls overfinancial reporting.        Date: June 11, 2007 /s/ Robert D. Burr   Acting Chief Financial Officer      
18
[if !vml]>[endif]>

[if !vml]>[endif]>

You have reached the FederalDepository Library Program Electronic Collection (FDLP/EC) Archive. Thisarchive assures ongoing access to publications in the FDLP/EC. Access topublications in the archive is available through GPO's suite of cataloging andlocator services, including the Catalog of U.S. Government Publications(CGP).  Archived copies of publications are retrieved in the event thatpublications are no longer available from the original publishing agency site. 
**Title:****YouTube war : fighting in aworld of cameras in every cell phone and Photoshop on every computer**
 
PDF | Mobi | ePub
 
SuDoc Number:D 101.146:Y 8
Item Number:0307-A-31 (online)
CGP systemNumber:000656076
 
January 8, 2020
CFPB Bulletin 11-1 

Re: Amendments to the Alternative Mortgage Transaction Parity Act 

Date: June 27, 2011 

 

On July 21, 2011, amendments to the Alternative Mortgage Transaction Parity Act 

(“AMTPA”) take effect pursuant to section 1083 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform 

and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank Act”). The amendments will affect what 

laws apply to mortgage loans issued by state chartered or licensed lenders after that 

effective date. 

AMTPA was enacted in 1982 to authorize state-chartered or -licensed “housing 

creditors” to make variable rate loans and other alternative mortgage transactions that 

would otherwise have been prohibited by state law, so long as the creditors complied 

with certain federal regulations. Implementation of AMTPA has historically been 

assigned to three federal banking regulators – the Office of the Comptroller of the 

Currency (OCC) for all state-chartered banks, the National Credit Union Administration 

(NCUA) for state-chartered credit unions, and the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) for 

both state-chartered thrifts and state-chartered or -licensed nondepository housing 

creditors. 

The Dodd-Frank Act makes three amendments to AMTPA: 

 AMTPA’s definition of “alternative mortgage transaction” is altered to remove 

language that specifically referenced: (1) certain balloon loans, (2) shared equity or 

appreciation transactions, and (3) mortgage loans involving other features not 

common to traditional fixed rate, fixed term transactions. The Dodd-Frank Act 

retains language defining alternative mortgage transactions as loans “in which the 

interest rate or finance charge may be adjusted or renegotiated.” 

 Section 1083 of the Dodd-Frank Act adds language to describe what state laws 

affecting alternative mortgage transactions may be preempted by AMPTA. As of July 

21, 2011, the effective date of the statutory amendments, AMTPA will no longer 

operate to preempt certain general state restrictions on mortgage transactions, 

including restrictions on prepayment penalties or late charges. 

 As of July 21, 2011, authority for issuing regulations to implement AMTPA will 

transfer from the OCC, NCUA, and OTS to the Consumer Financial Protection 

Bureau. The Dodd-Frank Act directs the Bureau to analyze the agencies’ existing 

regulations in conducting its own rulemaking. 
2 

The Dodd-Frank Act provides that the amendments do not affect any alternative 

mortgage transaction made on or before July 21, 2011. Existing loans will therefore be 

grandfathered under the existing OCC, NCUA, or OTS standards, as applicable. 

The Bureau anticipates providing further guidance as soon as possible concerning the 

applicability of AMTPA to alternative mortgage transaction loans made after July 21, 

2011. The Bureau’s goal is to provide for an orderly transition process for consumers, 

lenders, state legislatures, and other interested parties.
No. 67754.

#### Ebeling & Reuss Company *v.*United States,

protest 61/6576 (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Donlon, *J.*

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of figures similar in all material respects to those passed Upon in *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.*v. *United States*(39 CCPA 15, C.A.D. 458), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained as to the merchandise covered by entry 3296.
April 19, 2012 

Docket Management Facility 

US Department of Transportation 

1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE 

West Building Ground Floor 

Room W12-140 

Washington, DC 20590 

Re: Request for Extension of exemption number 10178 regarding Petition Docket Number FAA2010-1012. 

Docket Management Facility: 

Background:

On October 4, 2010, Seaborne Virgin Islands, Inc., doing business as Seaborne Airlines 

submitted a request for exemption which was assigned Docket Number FAA-2010-1012. This 

exemption would allow Seaborne Airlines to conduct VFR/Day Seaplane operations using their 

DeHavilland DHC-6-300 without installing the third gyroscopic bank and pitch indicator required 

by § 121.305(j). 

On December 16, 2010, the FAA issued Exemption Number 10178 which extended the 

compliance date for the referenced requirement to April 30, 2011. The stated purpose for the 

granting of this extension was to allow the FAA’s New York Aircraft Certification Office and the 

Canadian Civil Aviation Authority sufficient time to evaluate the request and make the 

determination if the aircraft in question will be able to meet the aircraft certification requirements. 

Since the airline has not received any information on the status of the FAA’s evaluation and less 

than 90 days remain until the expiration of Exemption 10178 on June 30, 2012, Seaborne 

Airlines is requesting that Exemption 10178 now be extended until June 30, 2013. 

As stated in previous requests, there have been no changes in the conditions and reasons 

relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption. 

Relief Sought and Justification for Relief

As of the date of this request, less than 90 days remain until Exemption Number 10178 expires 

on June 30, 2012. Should the FAA delay further in rendering its decision, Seaborne Airlines 

would not have sufficient time to obtain and install the required equipment if the FAA denies the 

original petition request. As a result, Seaborne Airlines is requesting that exemption 

number 10178 be extended to June 30, 2013, in order to avoid possible suspension of 

service by the airline. 

1 of 2
Top 10 Tips to Avoid 

Foreclosure 

If you are having financial challenges, these 10 tips may help you 

avoid foreclosure: 

1. Recognize early signs of trouble.

If you’ve lost your job, been through a divorce,

or suffered an illness and you’re worried about

making your mortgage payments, don’t be

afraid to ask for help.

2. Call your lender immediately.

Your lender doesn’t want your house, they

want to help you keep it. Contact your

lender, the organization that you send your

mortgage payments to each month (called

your mortgage servicer), at the very first sign

of financial difficulty. You and your lender can

explore your options.

3. Understand your options.

You may be eligible for a foreclosure

avoidance option, including a modification

under the federal Home Affordable

Modification program. Call your lender or

888-995-HOPE to see if you may be eligible.

4. Prioritize your spending.

Think about cutting nonessential expenses

such as cable TV, memberships, and

entertainment. When you get back on your

feet, you can consider adding some expenses

back into your spending plan.

5. Open and respond to all mail from

your lender.

If possible, your lender can help you

keep your house. Pay close attention to

all correspondence from your lender and

respond as soon as possible.

6. Know your mortgage rights.

Find and carefully read through your loan

documents, and research foreclosure laws

and timelines in your state. A reputable

housing counseling organization can help you

understand the documents and your options.

7. Be aware of scams.

If you’re falling behind on your mortgage

payments, scam artists may target you.

Check credentials, reputation, and experience

carefully, and always maintain personal

contact with your lender, as they are the best

person to help you.

8. Avoid paying upfront fees.

Don’t pay anyone an upfront fee for housing

counseling, or for modifying your loan. Most

foreclosure alternatives available, including

the federal Home Affordable Modification

program, offers help at no upfront cost to you.

9. Contact a housing counselor.

To find a legitimate counselor, call the

U.S. Department of Housing and Urban

Development at 800-569-4287, or visit

www.makinghomeaffordable.gov/. A housing

counseling organization can help you

understand your options and the next steps

to obtain assistance.

10. Commit yourself to the plan you

develop with your lender.

Whether your best option is a loan

modification or any of several other solutions

available through your lender, make sure

you work closely with your lender to stay on

course with the plan you created together.

Place your logo and contact information here.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ROBERT and MARIA HAYWARD :

: CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-CV-4133

Plaintiffs, :

:

v. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION;

BAYER AG;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE;

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM

:

:

:

:

:

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

:

Defendants. :

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of the Court:

Kindly enter the appearances of Hope S. Freiwald, Aline Fairweather, Erin

Brennan and Kirstin J. Miller as attorneys for defendant SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a

GlaxoSmithKline.

Respectfully Submitted,

_____________________________ _____________________________

Hope S. Freiwald Aline Fairweather

_____________________________ _____________________________

Erin Brennan Kirstin J. Miller

DECHERT PRICE & RHOADS

4000 Bell Atlantic Tower

1717 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2793

(215) 994-4000

Case 2:02-cv-04133-CMR Document 9 Filed 10/02/2002 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

 

ROBERT S. WALDMAN,

 Plaintiff,

 v.

T. BRADFOD, et al.,

 Defendant.

 

 CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-4091

 O R D E R 

 

AND NOW, this 1st day of July, 2002, it is ORDERED as follows:

1. SERVICE. COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF SHALL SERVE A COPY

OF THIS ORDER UPON COUNSEL FOR THE DEFENDANT AS SOON AS THE

IDENTITY OF COUNSEL IS LEARNED. Service of the Complaint shall be completed so

as not to delay the implementation of this Order.

2. PRETRIAL CONFERENCE. A pretrial conference in the above captioned case

will be held on September 6, 2002, at 9:00 A.M., before JUDGE MARVIN KATZ, in Chambers,

Room 13613, U.S. Courthouse, 601 Market Street, Philadelphia, PA.

The conference shall be attended by trial counsel prepared and authorized to discuss all

legal issues, trial matters and settlement.

In order to have a useful pretrial conference, as well as just, speedy, and inexpensive

determination of the action, plaintiff(s) and defendant(s) shall exchange on a mutually agreed time and

date at least five days before the conference:

(a) Copies of all material documents under their control;

(b) The names and addresses of all persons believed to have material information

and a summary of that information;

Case 2:02-cv-04091-MK Document 2 Filed 07/01/2002 Page 1 of 1
EXHIBIT 31.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Stuart Turk, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report of On The Go Healthcare, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement
   of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
   the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
   statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered
   by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
   information included in this report, fairly present in all material
   respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows
   of the small business issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in
   this report;

4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I are responsible
   for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
   defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small
   business issuer and have:

   (a)  Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
        disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
        supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
        small business issuer, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
        made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
        during the period in which this report is being prepared;

   (b)  Evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's disclosure
        controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
        about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as
        of the end of the period covered by this report based on such
        evaluation; and

   (c)  Disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
        internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the
        small business issuer's fourth fiscal quarter that has materially
        affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small
        business issuer's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer and I have disclosed,
   based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial
   reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit committee
   of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons performing
   the equivalent functions):

   (a)  All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
        or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
        reasonably likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's
        ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
        information; and

   (b)  Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
        employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
        internal control over financial reporting.

Date: October 30, 2006

/s/  Stuart Turk
--------------------------------------
By:  Stuart Turk
Chief Executive Officer

<PAGE>
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Marilyn Kelly

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra, Justices

Order 

January 25, 2012 

8/November 2011 

142117-8 

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF HARING, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 142117 

 COA: 292122 

 Wexford CC: 08-020967-CK 

CITY OF CADILLAC, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

TOWNSHIP OF SELMA, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

and 

TOWNSHIP OF CLAM LAKE, 

 Plaintiff, 

v SC: 142118 

 COA: 292164 

 Wexford CC: 08-021381-CK 

CITY OF CADILLAC, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, leave to appeal having been granted and the briefs and oral 

arguments of the parties having been considered by the Court, we AFFIRM the October 

12, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals. Although courts are not bound by the 

parties’ determination that a case is ripe, we agree with the parties that considering all of 

the circumstances this case is ripe for adjudication and that the claims are not contingent 

or hypothetical. 

 The grant of leave to appeal also asked the parties to address whether Washtenaw 

County Health Dep’t v T&M Chevrolet, Inc, 406 Mich 518 (1979), which held that when 

“an available sewer line crosses municipal boundaries, the municipality operating the 
I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

January 25, 2012 

t0118 

 

2

sewer system may not condition connection on annexation of the properties involved 

when connection means abatement of a public health hazard[,]” id. at 525-526, was 

correctly decided and, if so, whether it requires the defendant to continue providing 

sewage transportation and treatment services to the plaintiff townships. However, 

because there is no “public health hazard” requiring abatement presented in this case, the 

issue is not directly before the Court at this time and need not be decided.
No. 57166.

protests 929296-G, etc. (New York).

#### Ellis A. Beaumont et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the kidskin plates are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Kung Chen Fur Corpn.*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Ford, J., concurred.

Mollison, J., dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1480, *supra.*