alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Wachovia Bank, N.A.
100 North Main Street
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27150-3099

Sem

TI¢h
037

September 24, 1999

Ms. Cynthia L. Johnson

Director, Cash Management Policy & Planning Division
Financial Management Service

Room 420

401 14" Street, SW

Washington, D.C. 20227

Ref: Proposed Amendment to Treasury Tax & Loan Rate of Interest

Dear Ms. Johnson:

This comment letter is being submitted on behalf of Wachovia Bank, N.A. and Wachovia
Corporate Funding (hereinafter referred to as “Wachovia”). We appreciate the
opportunity to respond to the Treasury Department’s proposal to change the rate of
interest paid on TT&L note balances.

Wachovia participates in the Treasury Tax and Loan Investment Program as a Class C,
Note Option Depositary, with Direct Investments (DI) being received under the same-day
notice arrangement. If the Treasury changed the rate of interest paid on the Treasury Tax
and Loan note balance from the Federal funds rate less 25 basis points to a volume-
weighted average overnight repurchase agreement rate, Wachovia would consider either
withdrawing from the DI program or reducing our maximum note balance. We would
also consider changing from a same-day notice arrangement to a one-day notice
arrangement.

Wachovia currently purchases overnight Federal funds below the published Federal funds
rate. Our rates paid on overnight repurchase agreements (secured borrowings) are even
less than the rates we pay for Federal funds purchased. If the Treasury’s analysis is
correct and the proposed repurchase agreement rate is only two basis points less than the
published Federal funds rate, the proposed rate for the secured TT&L note would be
higher than the rate we pay for unsecured Federal funds. Also, by participating in the DI
program under the same-day notice arrangement, Wachovia believes it is foregoing a
degree of flexibility compared to repurchase agreements exercised in the open market and
should be compensated for this with a more favorable rate. The current rate arrangement
is fair for both parties.


Wachovia Bank, N.A
100 North Main Street
Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27150-3099

Guaranteed term

The Treasury also expressed an interest in comments regarding the extent to which TT&L
participants would be interested in obtaining TT&L note balances for a guaranteed term.
Wachovia does not have an interest in obtaining TT&L note balances for a guaranteed
term at this time.

We hope that these comments will be helpful in the Treasury’s deliberations concerning
the proposed regulation.

Thank you,

John A. Kondracki

John A. Kondracki
Senior Vice President
##### 



Exhibit 32.2
 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
  1.
    
    The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and2.
    
    The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
 Date: August 9, 2005
    
    By:
    
    /s/ Charles P. HuffmanCharles P. HuffmanSenior Vice President andChief Financial Officer
 31
Order entered January 2, 2014

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-13-00894-CV

ERIC DRAKE, Appellant

V.

SUNHEE PI, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 5

Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. CC-09-01374-E

ORDER

Before the Court is appellant’s December 30, 2013 motion for an extension of time to file 

a brief. The clerk’s record has not been filed. Appellant’s brief will be due thirty days after the 

clerk’s record is filed. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(a)(1). Accordingly, we DENY appellant’s 

motion as premature.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
No. 58432.

protest 199644-K (New York).

#### Theodore B. Smith Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

At the trial, it was stipulated that the component material of chief value of the date stamps was not india rubber; that items Medat 1000, 1010, and 1020 were composed in chief value of steel, not plated with platinum, gold, or silver, nor colored with gold lacquer; and that item Trodat 1220 was composed in chief value of polystyrol, which is similar to cellulose acetate in material, quality, texture, or use. In accordance with the stipulated facts, items Medat 1000, 1010, and 1020 were held dutiable at 22)4 percent under the provision in paragraph 397, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 51802), for articles or wares, composed wholly or in chief value of steel, not plated with platinum, gold, or silver. By virtue of the similitude clause of paragraph 1559, item Trodat 1220 was held dutiable at 20 percent under the provision in paragraph 31 (a) (2), as modified, *supra,*for articles, the component material of chief value of which is cellulose acetate.
No. 63556.

protest 59/18454 (New York).

#### Castlecliff, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, O. J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of imitation semiprecious stones, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 61231.

protests 296070-K and 300541-K (New York).

#### Freder Corp. and Mayer Import Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that the subject of Abstract 59105, the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (1) The items marked with the letter “A” at 10 percent under the provision in paragraph 1528, as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T. D. 52739), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T. D. 52836), for imitation semiprecious stones, faceted, and (2) the items marked with the letter “B” at 30 percent under the provision in said paragraph, as modified by T. D. 51802, supplemented by T. D. 51898, for imitation semiprecious stones, not faceted.
Before the First Division,

January 18, 1951

No. 55132.

#### Amin Azizullahoff and J. D. Smith Inter-Ocean, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 125053-K and 163873-K (B) (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Before the Second Division,

April 6, 1961

No. 65403.

#### Sears, Roebuck and Co. *v.*United States,

protests 301872-K/8729, etc. (Chicago).

*406Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Schmidt Pritchard & Co. et al.*(47 C.C.P.A. 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO



18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the quarterly report of Shoe Pavilion, Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 27, 2003 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof
(the Report), I, John D. Hellmann, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my
knowledge:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|/s/ John D. Hellmann                                        
|------------------------------------------------------------
|Vice President and Chief Financial Officer November 12, 2003



This certification accompanies the
Report pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, and shall not, except to the extent required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, be deemed filed by the Company for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
No. 51596.

#### Protests 975620-G, etc., of S. S. Kresge Co. et al. (Baltimore, etc.).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400-the court dismissed the protests.
Before the First Division,

April 15, 1959

No. 62973.

#### A. N. Khouri & Bro. *v.*United States,

protests 219517-K, etc. (New York).

*352Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that tbe merchandise consists of figures similar in all material respects to those passed upon in *Wm. S. Pitcairn Corp.*v. *United States*(39 C.C.P.A. 15, C.A.D. 458), tbe claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
# C_2016090EN.01001901.xml

| 7.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 90/19 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

7.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 90/19

---

Action brought on 23 November 2015 — Novartis v OHIM (Representation of a crescent in black and white)

(Case T-678/15)

(2016/C 090/26)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Novartis AG (Basel, Switzerland) (represented by: M. Zintler, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark (Representation of a crescent in black and white) — Application for registration No 13 191 036

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 23 September 2015 in Case R 89/2015-5

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | declare that Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 does not preclude the sign at issue (Community trade mark No 13 191 036) in respect of the goods in Class 5 described in the application for registration; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare that Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009 does not preclude the sign at issue (Community trade mark No 13 191 036) in respect of the goods in Class 5 described in the application for registration;

| — | order the defendant to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant to pay the costs.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | wrong application of Article 7(1)(b) Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

wrong application of Article 7(1)(b) Regulation No 207/2009.

---
```

[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 211 (Thursday, November 2, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 75287]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-24241]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Notice of Closed Meeting

    Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 1009(d), notice is hereby given of the 
following meeting.
    The meeting will be closed to the public in accordance with the 
provisions set forth in sections 552b(c)(4) and 552b(c)(6), title 5 
U.S.C., as amended, and the Determination of the Director, Office of 
Strategic Business Initiatives, Office of the Chief Operating Officer, 
CDC, pursuant to Public Law 92-463. The grant applications and the 
discussions could disclose confidential trade secrets or commercial 
property such as patentable material, and personal information 
concerning individuals associated with the grant applications, the 
disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of 
personal privacy.
    Name of Committee: Disease, Disability, and Injury Prevention and 
Control Special Emphasis Panel (SEP)-CE24-030, Research Grants for 
Preventing Violence and Violence Related Injury (R01).
    Dates: April 2-3, 2024.
    Times: 8:30 a.m.-5 p.m., EDT.
    Place: Videoconference.
    Agenda: To review and evaluate grant applications.
    For Further Information Contact: Carlisha Gentles, Pharm.D., 
B.C.P.S., C.D.C.E.S., Scientific Review Officer, National Center for 
Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention, 4770 Buford Highway NE, Mailstop F-63, Atlanta, Georgia 
30341. Telephone: (770) 488-1504; Email: [email protected].
    The Director, Office of Strategic Business Initiatives, Office of 
the Chief Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention, has been delegated the authority to sign Federal Register 
notices pertaining to announcements of meetings and other committee 
management activities, for both the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention and the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry.

Kalwant Smagh,
Director, Office of Strategic Business Initiatives, Office of the Chief 
Operating Officer, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
[FR Doc. 2023-24241 Filed 11-1-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4163-18-P
```
# C_2016059EN.01003001.xml

| 15.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 59/30 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 59/30

---

Action brought on 2 December 2015 — Syriatel Mobile Telecom v Council

(Case T-705/15)

(2016/C 059/32)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Syriatel Mobile Telecom (Joint Stock Company) (Damascus, Syria) (represented by: E. Ruchat, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | declare the applicant’s action admissible and well founded; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare the applicant’s action admissible and well founded;

| — | as a consequence, order the European Union to repair all of the harm allegedly suffered by the applicant at an amount to be fixed equitably by the Court; |
| --- | --- |

—

as a consequence, order the European Union to repair all of the harm allegedly suffered by the applicant at an amount to be fixed equitably by the Court;

| — | order an expert to be appointed in order to establish the total extent of the harm suffered by the applicant; |
| --- | --- |

—

order an expert to be appointed in order to establish the total extent of the harm suffered by the applicant;

| — | order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs of the proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council of the European Union to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on a single plea in law, alleging, first, the non-material harm caused by harm to its reputation, and, second, the material harm caused by the breakdown of its contractual relationships, by the loss of equipment and by the loss of revenue, which the applicant has suffered as a direct causal link to the measures taken by the Council of the European Union, for which the Council is liable.

---
# C_2016059EN.01003702.xml

| 15.2.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 59/37 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

15.2.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 59/37

---

Appeal brought on 8 December 2015 by LP against the Order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 28 September 2015 in Case F-73/14 LP v Europol

(Case T-719/15 P)

(2016/C 059/43)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Appellant: LP (The Hague, Netherlands) (represented by M. Velardo, lawyer)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Police Office (Europol)

Other party to the proceedings:

Form of order sought by the appellant

Form of order sought by the appellant

The applicant claims that the General Court should:

| — | Set aside the order of 28 September 2015 in Case F-73/14 and give a ruling on the case or, in the alternative, refer the case back to the Civil Service Tribunal; |
| --- | --- |

—

Set aside the order of 28 September 2015 in Case F-73/14 and give a ruling on the case or, in the alternative, refer the case back to the Civil Service Tribunal;

| — | Order Europol to pay the cost of both parties |
| --- | --- |

—

Order Europol to pay the cost of both parties

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the appeal, the appellant relies on a single plea in law, alleging that the contested order is vitiated by several errors of law and infringes EU law, in particular in respect of the obligation to provide a statement of reasons, the duty of care and the manifest error of assessment.

---
<PAGE>
                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending
December 31, 2002, of Cedar Brakes I, L.L.C. (the "Company") as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John L.
Harrison, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial
Officer) certify (i) that the Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and
(ii) that the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.


                                  /s/ John L. Harrison
                                  ----------------------------------------------
                                  John L. Harrison
                                  Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
                                  (Principal Financial Officer)

                                  March 31, 2003
No. 65384.

#### Air Express International Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 60/14033 (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

'Since the protest was filed more than 60 days after liquidation, it was dismissed as untimely, by virtue of section 514, Tariff Act of 1930.
* * ~-V , ;.. . * 

### ;1 * ST

ATE OF RHODE ts/_A.vnA.ND PuOVtuENCH . Pt. .t .vrA'r/o,vs ~' Ut1icaoflheSccicrar< ol'Si .iic ,Llatdtew,1 .13ramn,Srcrvtafl af'state ,t** **** Rules and Regulations Filing Form 1 . Name and Address of Agency h _ Environmental Management, Department of Office of Air Resources 235 Promenade Street Providence 2 . Title of These Rules and Regulations Air Pollution Control Regulation No. 37- Rhode Island's Low Emission Vehicle Program 3. Statutory Source ofAuthority to Issue These Rules RIGL 23-23-5 (22) 4. Purnose of New

Rules and Regulations or Ammendments The ps"eee~ amendments ves&W adopt the latest California Exhaust Emission Standards relating to greenhouse gas emissions, add the medium-duty weight class vehicles to the regulations and make a clarifying amendment for the Zero Emission Vehicle component of the Low Emission Vehicle II program . The greenhouse gas emission standards and standards for the medium-duty vehicles umtsid apply to new vehicles sold in Rhode Island beginning with model year 2009. 5 . Tyne of Filing 0 A . Emergency 0BI . Amendment 42-35-3 Ll B2. Adoption 42-35-3 ~B3 . Repeat 42-35-3 ~C . Technical Revision Ll D . Refile 42-35-4.1 Date of Public Notice : 10/31/2005 Date of Public Hearing: 11/30/2005 6 . Documents Filed (all filings must include entire regulation) 0 A . New Rule and Regulation

~C . Technical Revision ~D . Refiling Existing Regulations ~E . Emergency El F. Repealed B . Amended Rules and Regulations

*If yes to BI or Cin section S, identify the amended sections or revision(s) and the original date of filing : Will supersede ERLID 3351 7. Agency Code 8 . Certification 1 hearby certify that the attached rules and regulations were adopted in accordance with the Administrative Procedures Act (4Z-35) and that thev are trite copies oJ this Department, attest, Name: 

# f "1144, Title : Subscribed and sworn before me this 0



# ,~fCE I~'ED ERLID#: 37-30 

# '' ~ , 

# DEC ~ 2 20015 \ 

### 21 SECRETARY OF STATE -~DMINiSTRAT!VF RECCR"' .:C
Exhibit
      99.4


CONSENT
        OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS
 
 
 
 
 We
        hereby
        consent to the use of our name in the Annual Report on Form 40-F (the "Annual
        Report") of Enerplus Resources Fund (the "Registrant") and to the use of
        our
        name in the Registrant's Annual Information Form dated March 12, 2007 for
        the
        year ended December 31, 2006 which document makes reference to our firm and
        our
        reports entitled (i) "Joslyn Creek Evaluation Effective December 31, 2006"
        dated
        January 29, 2007, evaluating the Registrant's bitumen reserves effective
        December 31, 2006, and (ii) "EnerMark Inc. - Oil Sands Resources Summary"
        dated
        February 2, 2007, evaluating the Registrant's contingent bitumen resources
        effective December 31, 2006.
  Calgary,
                    Alberta, Canada
                  March
                      12, 2007
                GLJ
                    PETROLEUM CONSULTANTS LTD.**/**s/****Dana
                    B. LaustsenDana
                    B. Laustsen, P. Eng.
                  Executive
                    Vice-President
PROTECTION AGENCY 

ASHINGTON, D.C. 20460 

Dr. InCs R. Triay, Manager 

Carlsbad Field Office 

U.S. Department of Energy 

P.O. Box 3090 

Carlsbad, NM 9922 1-3090 

OFFICE OF 

AIR AND RADIATION 

Dear Dr. Triay. 

A modification rulemaking take a minimum of 12 months to complete from 

receipt of "complete" information change. It is our intention to refrain fiom 

conducting modification in which, by statute, we are required to 

consider the WIPP rulemaking likely would not be 

completed before application (expected to be 

submitted to EPA this proposal until after we 

have issued our in this regard in our 

December 2000 you dated April 24, 

2002, and to work with the 

@ Pnhfed on Recycled Paper 
2

Without EPA's approvaJ oftr change to the paneJ closure design system, DOEshouJd

ensUf: that. Conditi?n ~ of the WIPP ertification Decision is reflected in the WIPP compJiance

recertIfication applIcation.

If you have any questions ple,se call Betsy Forinash at (202) 564-9310.

Jt(~ Fr Marcinowski, Director

Radiation Protection Division

Lynne Smith, DOE/HQ

Cindy Zvonar, DOE/CBFO

Russ Patterson, DOE/CBFO

Matthew Silva, EEG

Steve Zappe, NMED .

cc: