alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Lex Smith, the Chief Executive Officer of Shoshone Silver
Mining Company (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company, for the
      fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) oar 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                        



| | By:    | /s/ Lex Smith                                  
| | ------ | -----------------------------------------------
| |        |                                                
| | Name:  | Lex Smith                                      
| | Title: | President and Principal Executive
      Officer
| | Date:  | May 18, 2007                                   



A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-KSB to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-KSB), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
DANBILL PARTNERS, L.P.,

Appellant, 

v.

SAUL SANDOVAL AND VERONICA 

SANDOVAL,

Appellees.

§

§

§

§

§

§

No. 08-19-00139-CV

Appeal from the

448th District Court

of El Paso County, Texas

(TC# 2019DCV0377)

J U D G M E N T

The Court has considered this cause on the record and concludes there was error in the 

judgment. We therefore vacate the order issuing the injunction, dissolve said injunction, and 

remand this cause for trial on the merits. We further order that Appellant recover from Appellees 

all costs, for which let execution issue. This decision shall be certified below for observance.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 30TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2020.

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice

Before Alley, C.J., Rodriguez, and Palafox, JJ.
Motion Granted in Part and Denied as Moot in Part ; Order filed October 29,

2019 .

In The



## Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________ NO. 14
- 18
- 00486
- CV

____________ IN RE ALEX MELVIN WADE, JR., Relator

____________ NO. 14
- 18
- 00487
- CV

____________ ALEX MELVIN WADE, JR . , Appellant

V. BANK OF AMERICA N.A. , Appellee
On Appeal from the 151st District Court

Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2017
- 39002



### ORDER On October 10, 2019, appellant filed a motion to recall the mandate in these consolidated proceedings on the ground that he did not receive notice of this court’sopinion and judgment issued July 23, 2019. Appellant’s motion is granted in cause

number 14

- 18

- 00487

- CV, the appe al in these proceedings. Because no mandate issued in cause number 14

- 18

- 00486

- CV, appellant’s motion is denied as moot. Appellant’s motion for rehearing is due in this court on or before November 8, 2019.

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Frost and Justices Jewell and Bourliot. (Chief Justice Frost would deny the motion).
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 21.1


                             CRYSTAL DECISIONS, INC.
                         SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
NAME OF SUBSIDIARY                                                STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION OF
                                                                          INCORPORATION
<S>                                                               <C>
  Crystal Decisions, Corp.                                                   New Brunswick, Canada
  Crystal Decisions (Japan) K.K.                                                             Japan
  Crystal Decisions (Singapore) Pte Ltd                                                  Singapore
  Crystal Decisions (UK) Limited                                  England and Wales, Delaware, USA
  Crystal Decisions (Australia) Pty Limited                                              Australia
  Crystal Decisions (France) S.A.                                                           France
  Crystal Decisions (Deutschland) GmbH                                                     Germany
  Crystal Decisions (Hong Kong) Limited                                                  Hong Kong
  Crystal Decisions (Ireland) Limited(1)                                                   Ireland
  Crystal Decisions Holdings Limited                                                       Ireland
  Seagate Software Information Management Group AB                                          Sweden
  Seagate Software Switzerland GmbH                                                    Switzerland
  Seagate Software Information Management Group B.V.                                   Netherlands
  Seagate Software (Italy) S.r.l                                                             Italy

(1) Subsidiary is an indirect subsidiary of Crystal Decisions, Inc.
</TABLE>
# Fourth Court of Appeals

**San Antonio, Texas**

JUDGMENT

No. 04

- 24

- 00105

- CV

IN THE INTEREST OF S.P. , N.I.A.D., A.D., and N.C.N.D

. , Children

From the 73rd Judicial District Court

, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2022

- PA

- 01460

Honorable Charles E. Montemayor , Judge Presiding

BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE MARTINEZ

, JUSTICE ALVAREZ , AND JUSTICE RODRIGUEZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the trial court’s judgment is AFFIRMED. The appellant is indigent. No costs are assessed.

SIGNED Ju ne 20, 2024.

_____________________________ Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice
**EXHIBIT
99.7**
 
 
 CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS
 
 
 We
hereby consent to the use of our name in the Annual Report on Form 40-F (the
"Annual Report") of Enerplus Resources Fund (the "Registrant"). We hereby
further consent to the inclusion in the Annual Report of the Registrant's
Renewal Annual Information Form dated March 14, 2005 for the year ended December
31, 2004, which document makes reference to our firm and our report entitled
"Joslyn Creek Evaluation Effective December 31, 2004", dated February 22, 2005,
evaluating the Registrant's oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids interests
effective December 31, 2004.
 
 Calgary, Alberta,
      Canada
    GILBERT LAUSTSEN
      JUNGMarch
      14, 2005
    ASSOCIATES
    LTD./s/
      Dana B. LaustsenDana B. Laustsen, P.
      Eng.Executive
      Vice-President
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

JOHN 1. KORESKO, V and PENNMONT

BENEFIT SERVICES, INC.

JEFF BLEIWEIS, RAYMOND G. ANKNER,

CJA AND ASSOCIATES, INC., THE

TRAVELERS LIFE AND ANNITY

COMPANY

NO. 2:04-cv-00769

WITHDRAWAL OF APPEARANCE

Kidly withdraw the appearance of Mark E. Gottieb, Esquire, Robert E. Franel

Esquire, Virginia 1. Miler, Esquire, Pamela Diane Hans, Esquire, Willam H. Pilsbury,

Esquire, and Jocelyn A. Gabrynowicz, Esquire of the law firm of Anderson, Kil & Olick, P.

on behalf of John J. Koresko, V and Pennont Benefit Services, Inc. in the above matter.

ANDERS? OLICK

Mark E. Gottieb, Esquire

1600 Market Street, Suite 2500

Philadelphia, P A 19103

(215) 568-4202

mgottlieb andersonkll.com

On behalf of himself and Robert E. Franel

Esquire, Virginia 1. Miler, Esquire, Pamela

Diane Hans, Esquire, Wiliam H. Pilsbur,

Esquire, and Jocelyn A. Gabrynowicz

Esquire

KOP:346514v 1 5319-
ENTRY OF APPEARNCE

Kindly enter our appearance on behalf of John J. Koresko, V and PennMont Benefit

Services, Inc. in the above-captioned matter.

' LOGAN, CARRE

By: 

ichael G. Trachtman, Esquire

475 Allendale Road

King of Prussia, P A 19406

(610) 354-9700

mtrachtman~powelltrachtman.com

Greg 1. tar, Esquire

475 Allendale Road

King of Prussia, P A 19406

(610) 354-9700

gstar~powelltrchtman.com

KOP:3465J4vI5319-
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I hereby certify that on August 2006 a copy of the foregoing Withdrawal of

Appearance and Entry of Appearance was fied electronically. Notice of this filing will be sent

to all paries by operation of the Cour' s electronic filing system. Paries may access ths fiing

through the Cour' s system.

POWELL, TRACHTMAN, LOGAN, CARRE

/Grfi eg squire

. 475 Allendale Road

King of Prussia, P A 19406

(610) 354-9700

gstar~powelltrachtman.com

KOP:346514vI5319-
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS IN CITADEL COMMUNICATIONS CORPORATION'S FORM 10-Q FOR THE SIX MONTHS
ENDED JUNE 30, 1998 AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                       4,211,115
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                               31,691,304
<ALLOWANCES>                               (1,126,545)
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                            37,671,672
<PP&E>                                      48,055,452
<DEPRECIATION>                            (11,371,828)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             372,779,659
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                       15,083,802
<BONDS>                                    220,594,859
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                      109,155,664
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                         8,516
<OTHER-SE>                                   2,172,573
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               372,779,659
<SALES>                                              0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                            62,923,649<F1>
<CGS>                                                0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                               47,110,472
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                            12,962,958
<LOSS-PROVISION>                               597,807
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                          10,042,263
<INCOME-PRETAX>                            (7,710,476)
<INCOME-TAX>                                 (882,961)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                        (6,827,515)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                               (6,827,515)
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                   (4.18)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (4.18)
<FN>
<F1>COMPRISED OF NET REVENUES (GROSS REVENUES NET OF AGENCY COMMISSIONS).
</FN>
        

</TABLE>
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<CASH>                                             357
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           7,620
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                 1,685
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      4,420
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                         17,931
<ALLOWANCE>                                         30
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  33,295
<DEPOSITS>                                      21,822
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                183
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           805
<OTHER-SE>                                      10,485
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  33,295
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                    702
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  103
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   229
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 1,034
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 482
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 482
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              552
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    393
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    167
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       111
<EPS-BASIC>                                        .14
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .14
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.55
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                    30
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                   30
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                30
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
# C_2015107EN.01003201.xml

| 30.3.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 107/32 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

30.3.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 107/32

---

Action brought on 19 January 2015 — Franmax v OHIM — Ehrmann (Dino)

(Case T-21/15)

(2015/C 107/41)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Franmax UAB (Vilnius, Lithuania) (represented by: E. Saukalas, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Ehrmann AG Oberschönegg im Allgäu (Oberschönegg, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Applicant: Applicant

Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word element ‘Dino’ — Application for registration No 10 809 481

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 23 October 2014 in Case R 2012/2013-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Plea(s) in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
No. 57894.

#### C. J. Tower & Sons *v.*United States,

protest 180710-K (Buffalo).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that the subject of *United States*v. *Geo. Wm. Rueff, Inc.*(41 C. C. P. A. 95, C. A. D. 535), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained. /O
August 4, 1948

NO. 52493.

protests 13272-K, 18643-K, and 25765-K.

#### Olavarria & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

C. D. 1107. Plaintiff’s application for rehearing denied.
Before The Third Division,

November 27, 1961

No. 66231.

#### Duncan Gilmour & Co., Ltd., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 60/9385, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
T hi s di s pos i t i on i s notappr opr i a t e f orpubl i c a t i on and i s notpr e c e de nt * e xc e pta s pr ovi de d by9th C i r . R . 36- 3.

T he pa ne l una ni m ous l yc onc l ude s thi s c a s e i s s ui t abl e f orde c i s i on ** w ith o u t o r a l a r g u m e n t. See F ed. R . A pp . P . 34 (a )( 2). NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T UN I T E D S T AT E S OF AME R I C A, P l ai nt i ff

- A pp el l ee , v. SUSAN CHA VEZ- RAM I RE Z, D e f

e n d a n t - A p p e lla n t. N o. 12- 10055 D. C . No . 1 : 0 9 - c r - 0 0 0 5 0 - S OM ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt

f o rth e D is tr ic t o f

H a w a ii S us a n O ki M ol l w a y , C hi e f J udge , P r e s i di ng S ubm i tt e d O c t obe r9, 2011 ** B e f o r e : R A W L I N S O N , M U R G U I A , a n d W A T F O R D , C ir c u it J u d g e s . S usan C havez-Ram i re z app ea l s f rom the 15 8-m on th sent ence i m po se d f o llo w in g h e rg u ilty - p le ac o n v ic tio n f o rc o n s p ir a c yto d is tr ib u te a n d p o s s e s s w ith i nt entt o d i stri bu t e 500 gram s or m ore of asubst ance cont ai ni ng m etham ph et am i ne, 

# FI LED OC T 16 2012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS12- 10055 2 in v io la tio n o f

2 1 U .S .C . § § 8 4 1 ( a ) ( 1 ) , 8 4 1 ( b ) ( 1 ) ( A ) , a n d 8 4 6 ; a n d p o s s e s s io n w ith i nt entt o d i stri bu t e 500 gram s or m ore of asubst ance cont ai ni ng m etham ph et am i ne, i n vi ol a t i on of

21 U . S . C . § 841( a ) ( 1) a nd ( b) ( 1) ( A ) . W e ha ve j ur i s di c t i on unde r28 U . S. C. § 1 2 9 1 , a n d w e a f f i rm. C ha ve z - R a m i r e z c ont e nds tha ti n gr a nt i ng adow nw a r d de pa rtur e unde r18 U . S . C . § 3 55 3(e) , the di stri ctcourtcoul d h ave c on si dere d fac t ors unrel at ed t o h er su b st an t i al assi st an ce. T h i s co n t en t i o n i s fo recl o sed b y U ni te d State s v . J

ac k s on , 5 7 7 F .3 d 1 0 3 2 , 1 0 3 6 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 0 9 ) . C o n tr a ryto C h a v e z - R a m ir e z ’s a r g u m e n t, P epper v . U

ni ted Stat es , 13 1 S . C t . 12 29 (201 1), do es no tperm i tus t o d i sr egar d o u rp r e c e d e n t. Se e U

n ite d S ta te s v . G o n z a lez - Zo te lo , 55 6 F . 3d 73 6, 74 0 (9th C i r. 20 09 ). C ha ve z - R a m i r e z a l s o c ont e nds tha tthe di s tr i c tc ourte rr e d w he n i tus e d the G ui del i nes r ange as the st art i ng po i ntfor the departure. E ven i f the di stri ctcourt s o e rr e d, C ha ve z - R a m i r e z ha s note s t abl i s he d ar e a s onabl e pr obabi l i tytha ts he w oul d ha ve r e c e i ve d adi f f e r e nts e nt e nc e ha d the di s tr i c tc ourti ns t e a d us e d the m a n d a to rym in im u m s e n te n c e a s th e s ta rtin g p o in t. Se e U ni te d State s v . D al lm an , 53 3 F . 3d 75 5, 76 2 (9th C i r. 20 08 ). AF F I RME D.
No. 51598.

#### Protests 83887-K, etc., of Mutual Supply Co. et al. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in al’li material respects as that passed upon in Abstract 50242. In accordance therewith the claim at 1)4 cents per pound under paragraph 717 (c) was sustained.
Before the Second Division,

May 31, 1956

No. 59961.

#### United Cutlery & Hardware Products Co. *v.*United States,

protest 237367-K (New York).

Opinion by

Laweence, J.

At the trial, a representative sample of the letter openers and of the sheaths or cases were received in evidence as exhibits 1 and 2, respectively, and, at the joint request of counsel, the court ordered that said articles be sent to the customs laboratory for analyses. At a subsequent date, the laboratory report was placed in evidence. The laboratory report indicating that the letter opener, exhibit 1, is composed of nickel-plated steel, the handle of which is in part gold plated, and that the case, exhibit 2, is composed of brass and is gold plated, the claim of the plaintiff was overruled.
(Reap. Dec. 10288)

Entry No. 2289.

#### Plywood & Door Manufacturers Corporation *v.*United States

(Decided June 27, 1962)

*Richard Yam, Steeriburffhfor*tbe plaintiff.

*Joseph, D. Guilfoyle,*Acting Assistant Attorney General, for tbe defendant.

Oliver, Chief Judge:

Tbe above-enumerated appeal for reap-praisement has been submitted for decision upon stipulation of counsel reading, so far as pertinent, as follows:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between tbe respective parties hereto that tbe merchandise involved in tbe appeal for reappraisement enumerated in Schedule “A,” attached hereto and made a part hereof, consists of birch plywood exported from Finland in tbe year 1953, and that tbe merchandise described in Schedule “A” is properly valued on tbe basis of Export Value, as defined in Section 402(d) of tbe Tariff Act of 1930, as amended.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the merchandise and tbe issues involved in tbe above designated appeal for reappraisement are tbe same in all material respects as those involved in *United States*v. *Plywood & Door Manufacturers Corporation,*A.R.D. No. 133, and that tbe record in the cited case may be incorporated in tbe record herein.

> IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that tbe value or tbe price of tbe merchandise described in Schedule “A,” hereto annexed, at tbe time of exportation of such merchandise, was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in tbe principal markets of tbe country from which exported, in the usual whole*347sale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade, for exportation to the United States, including the cost of all containers and coverings of whatever nature and all other costs, charges and expenses incident to placing the merchandise ready for shipment to the United States, was the values set forth in Column “4” of Schedule “A,” packed, less the pro rated amounts of the non-dutiable charges set forth directly after the description of the merchandise in said reappraisement case set forth in Schedule “A.”

On the agreed facts and following the decision in the cited case, I find that export value, as defined in section 402a (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, is the proper basis for the determination of the values of the plywood here involved, which is described in schedule “A,” attached hereto, and that such value is as set forth in column 4 of said schedule “A,” packed, less the prorated amounts of the nondutiable charges set forth in schedule “A” directly after the description of the merchandise.

Judgment will issue accordingly.