alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document

Exhibit 10.8(b)


—————————————————————
OTHER COMPENSATION AND BENEFIT
ARRANGEMENTS FOR
NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS
—————————————————————




The principal compensation arrangements and practices for First Horizon Corporation’s non-employee directors generally are governed by the company’s Director Policy. Relevant portions of the Director Policy are filed as a separate exhibit. The company reimburses its directors for their expenses incurred in attending meetings. The company does not consider this to be compensatory. In addition, the following benefits have been approved by the Board as additional compensation to all or specified non-employee directors for service as a director:


1)a personal account executive;


2)a no-fee personal checking account for the director and his or her spouse;


3)a no-fee VISA card;


4)no fee for a safe deposit box;


5)no fee for traveler’s checks and cashier’s checks;


6)if the Board has authorized a stock repurchase program, the repurchase of shares of the company’s common stock at the day’s volume-weighted average price with no payment of any fees or commissions if the repurchase of the director’s shares is otherwise permissible under the repurchase program that has been authorized;


7)use of tickets or other rights acquired by the company or any of its subsidiaries to attend events, dinners or other functions to enhance business, marketing, or community relations; provided that the aggregate value of such tickets or rights used in any year shall not exceed $5,000 per director; and


8)directors may participate in a charitable gift matching program up to $25,000 per year.


Directors who are officers of the company are not separately compensated for their services as directors.


1
No. 64763.

#### John V. Carr & Son, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 59/4261 (Detroit).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of prepared or preserved pork similar in all material respects to that the subject of *C. J. Tower & Sons*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 36, C.D. 2100), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 51298.

#### Protest 110995-K of Frank C. Schilling Co. (Pembina).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

From an examination of the papers the court was unable to find anything sufficient to overcome the action of the collector, which was presumptively correct. The protest was therefore overruled.
No. P68/180.

protests 63/16418 and 65/14665 (New York).

#### Lafayette Brass Mfg. Co., Inc., and Durst Industries, Inc. *v.*United States,

Beckworth, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” covered by the foregoing protests consist of rotary lawn sprinklers, or metal parts thereof dedicated for use therewith, similar in all material respects to those subject of *The Durst Mfg. Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(50 CCPA 56, C.A.D. 820), and that the items of merchandise marked “B” covered by the foregoing protests consist of couplings in chief value of zinc, the couplings being screwed on to the end of a garden hose in place of a nozzle such as that involved in *United States*v. *Lipman's*(52 CCPA 59, C.A.D. 859), the claims of the plaintiffs were sustained.
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

November 6, 2013

No. 04-13-00404-CV

IN RE The ESTATE OF Alberto TREVIÑO, Jr.

Original Mandamus Proceedings1

ORDER

Sitting: Catherine Stone, Chief Justice

Sandee Bryan Marion, Justice

Karen Angelini, Justice

Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

Patricia O. Alvarez, Justice

Luz Elena D. Chapa, Justice

The court has considered the Motion for En Banc Reconsideration filed on behalf of the 

real party in interest on October 7, 2013 and the motion is DENIED.

It is so ORDERED on November 6th, 2013.

_____________________________

Rebeca C. Martinez, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 6th day of November, 2013.

_____________________________

Keith E. Hottle

Clerk of Court

1 This proceeding arises out of Cause No. P-01796, styled In re the Estate of Alberto Treviño, Jr., pending in the 

County Court, Zapata County, Texas, the Honorable Joe Rathmell presiding.
July 2020

R E L E A S E 6 . 3

Overview of Release

Release Enhancements

Reports Portal User Interface Redesign

Description: Between August 2019 and March 2021, the Do Not Pay Portal will be undergoing a major redesign based on user 

feedback. The purpose of this redesign is to improve the ease of navigation and increase the usefulness of the various functions. 

Currently, Online Search, Batch Matching, Continuous Monitoring, and Reports are the redesigned functionalities. All other 

functionalities will remain in the Legacy Portal until their scheduled upgrade (see Future Updates).

Redesigned Continuous Monitoring Landing Page

• Reports Portal User Interface Redesign

• Online Search Matched Data Source Save/Print Detail

• Future Updates

Announcements 

New messages will be 

posted here.

Legacy Portal

Click to go to the legacy 

modules.

Reports 

Click here to launch.

Adjudication Summary Report

Click here to view the ASR.

Navigation Bar 

Attempting to click on any icons other than Online Search, 

Batch Matching, Continuous Monitoring, or Reports will 

result in a pop-up box directing users to click on the link at 

the top of the screen to re-direct to the legacy Portal.

Payment Activity Report

Click here to see the PAR.

Help

Click here for guidance 

relevant to the current 

page.
July 2020

Release Enhancements (cont.)

Adjudication Summary Report

• Select the Year and Month you wish to view in the ASR. Use the Agency Location Code drop-down to filter results by 

the selected code(s). Note, only the Agency Location Code(s) you have access to will be displayed. Then, click the 

[Generate Report] button to display the results. 

• For Level 1 users, the [Submit Report] button becomes active on the first calendar day of the month for the prior 

month’s ASR. If you click this button, a window appears asking you to verify the submission as doing so marks the 

adjudication as “Final” which cannot be reversed. Note, the option to insert comments during report submission has 

been removed.

• Use the menu toolbar to open the PDF in a new tab, print, or download.

Payment Activity Report

• Select the Date Range you wish to view in the PAR. Use the Agency Location Code drop-down to filter results by the 

selected code(s). Then, click the [Generate Report] button to display the results.

• Use the menu toolbar to open the PDF in a new tab, print, or download.
July 2020

Release Enhancements (cont.)

Online Search Matched Data Source Save/Print Detail

Description: Users are able to save and print the details of data source matches in the Online Search functionality. 

Future Updates

Timeline for Functionality Upgrades to Redesigned Portal

This diagram shows the timeline in which each of the functionalities will be upgraded to the redesigned site, with a 

completion date by March 2021.
IV 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 932 

Expressing solidarity with the Tuidang Movement whereby Chinese citizens 

renounce their ties to the Chinese Communist Party and its affiliates, 

and calling for an immediate end to the campaign to persecute Falun 

Gong practitioners. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JUNE 8, 2018 

Mr. ROHRABACHER submitted the following resolution; which was referred to 

the Committee on Foreign Affairs 

RESOLUTION 

Expressing solidarity with the Tuidang Movement whereby 

Chinese citizens renounce their ties to the Chinese Communist Party and its affiliates, and calling for an immediate end to the campaign to persecute Falun Gong 

practitioners. 

Whereas the CCP has caused unnatural deaths of at least 60 

million people in China; 

Whereas the CCP continues to violently suppress peaceful 

movements, including during the Tiananmen Square student democratic movement and the 19-year long, ongoing persecution of Falun Gong; 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 932 IH 

Whereas the CCP is responsible for organ harvesting of 

Falun Gong practitioners, dissidents, and minority 

groups; 

Whereas according to the United States Commission on 

International Religious Freedom’s (USCIRF) 2017 Annual Report on China, ‘‘The government continued to detain, imprison, and torture countless religious freedom 

advocates, human rights defenders, and religious believers, including highly persecuted Falun Gong practitioners.’’; 

Whereas according to the World Organization to Investigate 

the Persecution on Falun Gong (WOIPFG), the genocidal mass killing of Falun Gong practitioners via live 

organ harvesting has been orchestrated and committed by 

the CCP; 

Whereas the ‘‘610 Office’’ was established on June 10, 1999, 

to coordinate and execute operations aimed at eliminating 

practitioners of Falun Gong; 

Whereas according to the United States Congressional-Executive Commission on China’s (CECC) 2017 Annual Report, ‘‘Government officials continued to detain or otherwise restrict the freedom of Catholic and Christian leaders in both the underground and official church.’’; 

Whereas the CCP coerced the Vatican to accept party-nominated bishops in China; 

Whereas the Tuidang Movement supports freedom for the 

Chinese people and renouncing membership in the CCP 

and its affiliates; and 

Whereas the number of people renouncing their membership 

in the CCP reached a total of approximately 300 million 

in 2018: Now, therefore, be it 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
3 

•HRES 932 IH 

1 Resolved, That the House of Representatives— 

2 (1) expresses solidarity with Falun Gong practi3 tioners and their families; 

4 (2) calls upon the Chinese Communist Party 

5 (CCP) to immediately cease and desist its campaign 

6 to persecute Falun Gong; and 

7 (3) expresses support for the Tuidang Move8 ment and their pursuit of a free and democratic gov9 ernment in China. 

Æ 


sradovich on DSK3GMQ082PROD with BILLS
Case 2:04-cv-00650-CN Document 9 Filed 03/12/04 Page 1 of 24
Case 2:04-cv-00650-CN Document 9 Filed 03/12/04 Page 2 of 24
Case 2:04-cv-00650-CN Document 9 Filed 03/12/04 Page 3 of 24
Case 2:04-cv-00650-CN Document 9 Filed 03/12/04 Page 4 of 24
Case 2:04-cv-00650-CN Document 9 Filed 03/12/04 Page 5 of 24
Case 2:04-cv-00650-CN Document 9 Filed 03/12/04 Page 6 of 24
Case 2:04-cv-00650-CN Document 9 Filed 03/12/04 Page 7 of 24
Case 2:04-cv-00650-CN Document 9 Filed 03/12/04 Page 8 of 24
Case 2:04-cv-00650-CN Document 9 Filed 03/12/04 Page 9 of 24
Case 2:04-cv-00650-CN Document 9 Filed 03/12/04 Page 10 of 24
Case 2:04-cv-00650-CN Document 9 Filed 03/12/04 Page 11 of 24
Case 2:04-cv-00650-CN Document 9 Filed 03/12/04 Page 12 of 24
Case 2:04-cv-00650-CN Document 9 Filed 03/12/04 Page 13 of 24
Case 2:04-cv-00650-CN Document 9 Filed 03/12/04 Page 14 of 24
Case 2:04-cv-00650-CN Document 9 Filed 03/12/04 Page 15 of 24
Case 2:04-cv-00650-CN Document 9 Filed 03/12/04 Page 16 of 24
Case 2:04-cv-00650-CN Document 9 Filed 03/12/04 Page 17 of 24
Case 2:04-cv-00650-CN Document 9 Filed 03/12/04 Page 18 of 24
Case 2:04-cv-00650-CN Document 9 Filed 03/12/04 Page 19 of 24
Case 2:04-cv-00650-CN Document 9 Filed 03/12/04 Page 20 of 24
Case 2:04-cv-00650-CN Document 9 Filed 03/12/04 Page 21 of 24
Case 2:04-cv-00650-CN Document 9 Filed 03/12/04 Page 22 of 24
Case 2:04-cv-00650-CN Document 9 Filed 03/12/04 Page 23 of 24
Case 2:04-cv-00650-CN Document 9 Filed 03/12/04 Page 24 of 24
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended (the Exchange Act), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Jeffrey Staszak, Chief Executive Officer of Volterra Semiconductor Corporation (the
Company), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:

1. The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 31, 2009, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Quarterly Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and

2. The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

In Witness Whereof, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of the 4thday of May, 2009.



|    |  |                        
|--- |  | -----------------------
|    | 
|By: |  | /s/ Jeffrey Staszak    
|    |  | Jeffrey Staszak        
|    |  | Chief Executive Officer

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Volterra Semiconductor Corporation under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the
date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA

FOURTH DISTRICT

LESTER BAILEY,

Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D19-648

[June 6, 2019]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for 

the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Dennis D. Bailey, 

Judge; L.T. Case No. 062014CF011174A88810.

Lester Bailey, Madison, pro se.

No appearance required of appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

TAYLOR, MAY and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
No. 59446.

protest 256089-K (Portland, Maine).

#### Saxe Cutch Corporation *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

The official papers disclosed that the merchandise was liquidated at a dutiable value based on a price of 8)4 cents per pound, plus 10 percent on the basis of a 60.5 percent tannin content. The protest claimed that liquidation should have been based on a tannin content of 56.22 percent. Accordingly, it was held that the issue in this case is not one of classification but rather a question of the value of the merchandise. Since no timely appeal for reappraisement under section 501, as amended, was filed, the protest was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. *(Allen Forwarding Co.*v. *United States,*59 Treas. Dec. 1433, T. D. 44986, cited.)
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                            W-H ENERGY SERVICES, INC.
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


        In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period
ended June 30, 2004 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey L. Tepera, the Chief Financial Officer of
W-H Energy Services, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, to my knowledge,
that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                       /s/  Jeffrey L. Tepera
                                    -----------------------------------------
                                    Name: Jeffrey L. Tepera
                                    Date: August 5, 2004


This certification is furnished solely to comply with the requirements of Rule
13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
is subject to the knowledge standard contained therein and shall not be deemed
to be a part of the Report or "filed" for any purpose whatsoever.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Shoe Pavilion, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-Q for the period ended
March 29, 2008 (the "Report"), I, Dmitry Beinus, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to  §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and
2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

/s/ DMITRY BEINUS Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
                   May 12, 2008

This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the SEC and is not to be
incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such
filing.

---
EXHIBIT 99.4

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED CHARTERED ACCOUNTANTS

We
consent to the use of our reports dated February 25, 2009 relating to the financial statements (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes a separate report
titled Comments by Independent Registered Chartered Accountants on Canada-United States of America Reporting Difference referring to changes in accounting principles) of Enerplus Resources Fund
and the effectiveness of Enerplus Resources Fund's internal control over financial reporting appearing in this Annual Report on Form 40-F of Enerplus Resources Fund for the year
ended December 31, 2008.

/s/DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLPIndependent Registered Chartered AccountantsCalgary, Alberta
February 25, 2009


---



QuickLinks
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

DA 21-0077

_________________

IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF:

CHERYL L. TARBET, f/k/a

CHERYL L. SMITH,

 Petitioner and Appellee,

 and

RANDALL B. SMITH,

 Respondent and Appellant.

O R D E R

_________________

Pursuant to the Internal Operating Rules of this Court, this cause is classified for 

submission on briefs to a five-justice panel of this Court. 

The Clerk is directed to provide a copy hereof to Cheryl L. Tarbet, to all counsel of 

record, and to the Honorable Christopher D. Abbott, District Judge.

For the Court,

Electronically signed by:

Mike McGrath

Chief Justice, Montana Supreme Court

October 6 2021

10/06/2021

Case Number: DA 21-0077
# C_2015320EN.01003401.xml

| 28.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 320/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

28.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 320/34

---

Action brought on 10 July 2015 — Jordi Nogues/OHIM — Grupo Osborne (BADTORO)

(Case T-386/15)

(2015/C 320/51)

Language in which the application was lodged: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Jordi Nogues, SL (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: M. Sanmartín Sanmartín and E. López Parés, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Grupo Osborne, SA (El Puerto de Santa María, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Applicant: Applicant

Applicant:

Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word element ‘BADTORO’ — Application for registration No 10 975 027

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before OHIM

Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of OHIM of 17 April 2015 in Case R 2570/2013-2

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay the applicant’s costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to bear its own costs and to pay the applicant’s costs.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Articles 75, 76 and 83 of Regulation No 207/2009, in conjunction with Articles 65(6), 96, 106(4) and (6) and 135 of Regulation No 2868/95; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Articles 75, 76 and 83 of Regulation No 207/2009, in conjunction with Articles 65(6), 96, 106(4) and (6) and 135 of Regulation No 2868/95;

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
No. 64012.

protests 208720-K, 293588-K, and 293594-K (Baltimore).

#### W. A. Taylor & Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and *Austin, Nichols & Co, Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
April 19, 2012

Docket Management Facility US Department of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE West Building Ground Floor

Room W12-140 Washington, DC 20590

Re: Request for Extension of exemption number 10178 regarding Petition Docket Number FAA2010-1012.

Docket Management Facility:

Background: On October 4, 2010, Seaborne Virgin Islands, Inc., doing business as Seaborne Airlines submitted a request for exemption which was assigned Docket Number FAA-2010-1012. This exemption would allow Seaborne Airlines to conduct VFR/Day Seaplane operations using their DeHavilland DHC-6-300 without installing the thir d gyroscopic bank and pitch indicator required by § 121.305(j).

On December 16, 2010, the FAA issued Exemption Number 10178 which extended the compliance date for the referenced requirement to April 30, 2011. The stated purpose for the granting of this extension was to allow the FAA’s New York Aircraft Certification Office and the Canadian Civil Aviation Authority sufficient time to evaluate the request and make the determination if the aircraft in question will be able to meet the aircraft certification requirements.

Since the airline has not received any informatio n on the status of the FAA’s evaluation and less than 90 days remain until the expiration of Exemption 10178 on June 30, 2012, Seaborne Airlines is requesting that Exemption 10178 now be extended until June 30, 2013.

As stated in previous requests, there have been no changes in the conditions and reasons relative to public interest and safety that were the basis for granting the original exemption.

Relief Sought and Justification for Relief As of the date of this request, less than 90 days remain until Exemption Number 10178 expires on June 30, 2012. Should the FAA delay further in rendering its decision, Seaborne Airlines would not have sufficient time to obtain and install the required equipment if the FAA denies the original petition request. As a result, Seaborne Airlines is requesting that exemption number 10178 be extended to June 30, 2013, in order to avoid possible suspension of service by the airline.

1 of 2