alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                         188,016
<SECURITIES>                                    59,070
<RECEIVABLES>                                   24,385
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,122
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               279,566
<PP&E>                                           7,091
<DEPRECIATION>                                   1,642
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 285,820
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           55,958
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           127
<OTHER-SE>                                     229,735
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   285,820
<SALES>                                         16,318
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                20,535
<CGS>                                              383
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                    4,076
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                20,197
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                   546
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,825)
<INCOME-TAX>                                         0
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (1,825)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (1,825)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (0.02)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (0.02)


</TABLE>
Before the First Division,

August 24, 1951

No. 55830.

protest 130820-K (Providence).

#### Arthur I. Darman Company, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In' accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of rabbit fur similar in all material respects to that the subject of Abstract 53024, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.1

               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO RULE 13A-14(a)/15d-14(a)

I, Scott D. Dorfman, certify that:

1.   I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q/A of Innotrac
     Corporation;

2.   Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of
     a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the
     statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
     were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this
     report;

3.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
     establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
     in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
         disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
         supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the
         registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to
         us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in
         which this report is being prepared;

     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
         procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
         effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
         of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's
         most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in
         the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is
         reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting; and

4.   The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
     our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to
     the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board
     of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
         operation of internal control over financial reporting which are
         reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
         record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
         employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
         control over financial reporting.

Date:  August 20, 2003          /s/ Scott D. Dorfman
                                -----------------------------------
                                Scott D. Dorfman
                                President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
                                of the Board (Principal Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT 4.21


WORLD GAMING      The CIBC Banking Centre    tel.  (268) 480-1650
                  Old Parham Road            fax. (268) 480-1656
                  P.O. Box 3265
                  St. John's, Antigua
                  West Indies                www.worldgaming.com


16 May, 2002


Mr. Rodney Davis,
348 Granby Court,
Pickering, Ontario


Dear Rodney,


As per our conversation, this letter serves as acceptance in writing of your
letter of resignation dated 20 May, 2002.


Please note that the company reserves the right to enforce the Confidentiality
clause of your Employment Agreement, for a six (6) month period, immediately
following your termination.

In recognition of your contribution, we offer you a generous severance package
comprising the following:

         o        Six (6) months base salary, to be paid in twelve (12) equal
                  semi-monthly installments.

         o        Accrued bonus (50%) for January to May, 2002.

         o        Severance Bonuse (50%) for the period June-November, 2002.

         o        Accrued Vacation Pay for 16 Days: US$11,515.15

         o        Current options will continue to vest until 21 November, 2002.
                  The current option grants are as follows:

                           100,000 vested options at $1.34
                           25,000 vested options at $2.25
                           50,000 vested options at $0.45
                           25,000 vested options at $0.90
                           25,000 vested options at $0.60


I wish to take this opportunity to thank you for your invaluable contribution to
the growth and reorganization of Worldgaming, and wish you the very best in your
future endeavors.

Kindly indicated by your signature that you have read and accepted the above
mentioned package.

<PAGE>

WORLD GAMING      The CIBC Banking Centre    tel.  (268) 480-1650
                  Old Parham Road            fax. (268) 480-1656
                  P.O. Box 3265
                  St. John's, Antigua
                  West Indies                www.worldgaming.com




Sincerely,



___________________________
Jim McDay
Director,
World Gaming BOD

CCLucette James-Wint
Director of Human Resouces & Facilities




I have read, and accepted the severance package outline above.

_______________________________________
Rodney Davis               Date:
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

: CIVIL ACTION NOS.

:

ABBOTT : 02-3883

MCDANIEL, et al. : 02-3906

MENDOZA : 02-3955

MEYER : 02-3987

KUEHL, et al. : 02-4134

QUITASOL, et al. : 02-4209

MONTANEZ, et al. : 02-4254

DIEBERT, et al. : 02-4323

:

:

VS. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION, et al. :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of July, 2002, the Court having been previously

advised that the above action cannot proceed to trial and disposition because of the following

reason:

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending disposition of a related

action.

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending determination of

arbitration proceedings.

[ ] - Interlocutory appeal filed.

[ X ] - Other: Case is placed into suspense pending receipt of the Case

Transfer Order from the Judicial Panel on Multi District Litigation

transferring case to District of Minnesota..

It is

ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this action closed for statistical purposes and

place the matter in the Civil Suspense File, and it is

Case 2:02-cv-04134-CRW Document 2 Filed 07/10/2002 Page 1 of 2
FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction; and that the case be

restored to the trial docket when the action is in a status so that it may proceed to final

disposition; this order shall not prejudice the rights of the parties to this litigation.

BY THE COURT:

________________________________________

Charles R. Weiner, Judge

Case 2:02-cv-04134-CRW Document 2 Filed 07/10/2002 Page 2 of 2
No. 63529.

protests 17205-K and 25437-K (Boston).

#### Liberty Liquors, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE : CIVIL ACTION 

DVI, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION : No. 03-5336

ORDER

AND NOW, this 28th day of March, 2016, upon consideration of the moving papers filed 

by Kam Sitthidet and Ron Sitthideth (together, “the Sitthideths”), requesting exclusion from this 

Class action, and requesting to opt out of the Stipulations and the Settlements between Lead 

Plaintiffs and Defendants, and upon further consideration of the papers submitted by Counsel for 

Lead Plaintiffs and the Class, Clinton A. Krislove, Esq. and Michael R. Karnuth, Esq. of 

Krislove & Associates, Ltd., and the papers submitted by Defendants Deloitte & Touche LLP, 

Harry T. J. Roberts, and John P. Boyle,1it is hereby ORDERED that the Sitthideths’s Motion 

(Doc. Nos. 1009, 1013) is DENIED. 

BY THE COURT: 

/s/ Legrome D. Davis

Legrome D. Davis, J. 

 

1

 See Sitthideths’s “Motion to Reconsider a Few Class Members” (Doc. No. 1009); L. Pls./Class 

Counsel’s Resp. (Doc. No. 1010); “Sitthidet Response and Rebuttal,” with Ex. B, the Sitthideths’s TD 

Ameritrade statement (Doc. No. 1013); L. Pls./Class Counsel’s Reply (Doc. No. 1014), with Ex. 1, K. 

Sitthidet’s letter, dated Sept. 17, 2015 (Doc. No. 1014-2). See also Def. Deloitte’s letter, dated Oct. 1, 

2015 (Doc. No. 1016), requesting reconsideration of the Order, dated Sept. 23, 2015; Defs. Roberts’s and 

Boyle’s letter, dated Jan. 28, 2016, joining in Deloitte’s letter request (Doc. No. 1021). See further L. 

Pls./Class Counsel’s “Position on Sitthideths’ Request to Be Excluded” (Doc. No. 1018); L. Pls./Class 

Counsel’s Submission, with J. Bravata Decl., dated Jan. 28, 2016, and Exs. 1-2 (Doc. No. 1020). 

Case 2:03-cv-05336-LDD Document 1023 Filed 03/28/16 Page 1 of 1
RECEIVEf3 

IDPPT CBIC 

201~ JUN -5 AM fO: 46 

CBJC Control Number 

May 22,2014 

Director, Chemical Control Division 

US Environmental Protection Agency 

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics 

EPA East 

Room4146 

1201 Constitution A venue, NW 

Washington, DC 20004 

Re: EPA - HQ- OPPT- 2003 - 0012 

360501 

DuPont Chemicals and Fluoroproducts 

Chambers Works 

Deepwater, NJ 08023 

DuPont Chambers Works NJPDES Permit No. NJ0005100 

PFOA Data Submittal- Outfall DSN662 Weekly Grab Samples 

April 2014 Sample Data 

Dear Chemical Control Division: 

Attached please find summaries of PFOA analytical results for the DuPont Chambers Works 

weekly, grab samples taken at internal outfall DSN662A in April2014. In accordance with the 

current site NJPDES permit (NJ0005100, effective September 2011), these results are provided 

to NJDEP on a monthly basis via electronic discharge monitoring reports. The enclosures 

include two paper and two electronic copies of the analytical results from this monitoring period. 

Sincerely, 

ll#ft&tfY/A_ 

Albert Patrick O'Neill 

Unit Manager-Site Manufacturing Systems/Fluoroproducts 

DuPont Chambers Works 

APO/clc 

Enclosures 
. ·! 

Copy to: 

Document Control Office 

US Environmental Protection Agency 

Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics 

EPA East 

Room6428 

1200 Pennsylvania A venue, NW 

Washington, DC 20460 

Ms. Susan Rosenwinkel (cover letter only) 

Principal Environmental Engineer 

NJDEP Division of Water Quality 

Bureau of Water Surfacing 

Mail Code 40 1-02B 

401 E. State Street 

P.O. Box420 

Trenton, NJ 08625-0420 
Analyte 

PFOA 

SampleiD 

Date 

Top (ft) 

Total (T)/ Bottom (ft) 

units Diss. (D) Duplicate# 

ug/L T 

Summary of Analytical Results 

662 - April 2014 

662-GRAB 662-GRAB 662-GRAB 662-GRAB 

4/7/14 4/14/14 4/21/14 4/28/14 

0 0 0 0 

0 0 0 0 

1 1 1 1 

2.75 3.07 3.77 3.09 

PFOA = Perfluorooctanoic Acid 

ug/L = micrograms per Liter 

ug/L =micrograms per liter or parts per billion (ppb) 

LOQ - limit of quantification - 0.1 00 ug/L 

I 

Samples were analyzed by Critical Path Services LLC. Reported results 

represent a single analysis, except for the sample collected on 4/28/14. 

Acceptable precision was obtained and the reported result for the sample 

collected on 4/28/14 represents the average of lab duplicate results. 

I 

The NJDEP lab certification number for Critical Path Services LLC is PA072. 

< and NO = Non_detect at stated reporting limit Page 1 of 1 

I 

I I 

i 

-

Copy of cwk 6
**Exhibit 32.2****CERTIFICATION**Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, asamended (the “Exchange Act”), and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code(18 U.S.C. §1350), Mike Burns, Chief Financial Officer of Volterra Semiconductor Corporation (the“Company”), hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge:1. The Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2008, to which thisCertification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the “Quarterly Report”) fully complies with therequirements of Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act, and2. The information contained in the Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.**In Witness Whereof**, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of the 30th day of April, 2008.         By:  /s/ Mike Burns    Mike Burns    Chief Financial Officer   This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with theSecurities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing ofVolterra Semiconductor Corporation under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the Form 10-Q),irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
From: Telander.Jeff@epamail.epa.gov [mailto:Telander.Jeff@epamail.epa.gov]  

Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2011 12:12 PM

To: Jason Pence

Cc: Ed Watson; Garth Tayler; Susan Miller; Marinshaw, Richard; Raymond, Gabrielle; Holloway, Thomas

C. (Tom)

Subject: Re: Acme Brick ‐ ICR Response

Dear Mr. Pence,  

We approve of your plan for fulfilling the requirements of the information request that was sent to

Acme on 11/17/2010.  

However, regarding the Acme facilities that will rely on historical test data to represent their

performance, we reserve the right to require testing of those facilities if we identify any QA issues with

the historical data or if we receive insufficient data from the rest of the industry.  

Sincerely,  

Jeff Telander  

Jeff Telander

Sector Policies and Programs Division

Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards

(D243‐02)

RTP, NC  27711

919 ‐ 541‐5427

919 ‐ 541‐5450 (FAX)

Overnight mail address:

US EPA

Mail Code D243‐02

109 TW Alexander Drive

RTP, NC  27709
EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the annual report of World Gaming plc (the "Company") on Form
20-F for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, A. Daniel Moran, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ A. Daniel Moran
-------------------
A. Daniel Moran
Chief Executive Officer
June 30, 2003
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

JOHN J. KORESKO, V, et al. : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. : No.: 04-769

:

JEFF BLEWEIS, et al. :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 5th day of August, 2009, it is hereby ORDERED a teleconference shall

take place on August 18, 2009, at 10:00 a.m., regarding Plaintiffs’ Second Motion to Vacate

Order Dismissing Case. Counsel for Plaintiffs shall initiate the call.

BY THE COURT:

 /s/ Juan R. Sánchez 

Juan R. Sánchez, J.
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined

that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent

except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR.

R. 47.5.4.

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

 

No. 02-40991

Summary Calendar

 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

STEPHEN DEWAYNE WALKER,

Defendant-Appellant.

--------------------

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Eastern District of Texas

USDC No. 6:01-CR-55-1

--------------------

February 6, 2003

Before REAVLEY, SMITH and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Stephen DeWayne Walker appeals his sentence following his

guilty-plea conviction for possession with intent to distribute

and distribution of cocaine base, in violation of 21 U.S.C.

§ 841(a). He argues that the district court erred in relying on

the Presentence Report (PSR) to determine drug quantity and that

the Government breached the plea agreement at sentencing by

supporting the district court’s drug quantity determination. 
No. 02-40991

-2-

Because Walker raises these arguments for the first time on

appeal, this court’s review is for plain error only. See FED.

R. CRIM. P. 52(b); United States v. Calverley, 37 F.3d 160, 162-

64 (5th Cir. 1994)(en banc), abrogated in part, Johnson v. United

States, 520 U.S. 461 (1997). 

A PSR generally bears sufficient indicia of reliability to

be considered as evidence by the sentencing judge when making

factual determinations required by the Sentencing Guidelines. 

United States v. Fitzgerald, 89 F.3d 218, 223 (5th Cir. 1996). 

Walker fails to demonstrate that the information in the PSR

regarding the amount of drugs involved was “materially untrue,

inaccurate or unreliable.” Id. Furthermore, Walker’s reliance

on United States v. Taylor, 277 F.3d 721 (5th Cir. 2001), and

United States v. Shacklett, 921 F.2d 580 (5th Cir. 1991), is

misplaced as the plea agreements in those cases contained “use

immunity” provisions. There is no such provision in Walker’s

plea agreement.

In determining whether the Government has breached a plea

agreement, the court must determine whether the Government’s

conduct is consistent with the parties’ reasonable understanding

of the agreement. United States v. Chagra, 957 F.2d 192, 194

(5th Cir. 1992). Contrary to Walker’s contentions, the plea

agreement did not include terms concerning the quantity of drugs

for which Walker would be held accountable or the probable

sentence he would receive. Moreover, Walker’s understanding that
No. 02-40991

-3-

his sentence would be based on the amount of drugs alleged in the

information was not reasonable in light of the plea agreement’s

provisions regarding his sentencing. See id. at 195.

Based on the foregoing, Walker fails to demonstrate error,

plain or otherwise. See Calverley, 37 F.3d at 162-64. 

Accordingly, the district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

WILLIE L. YOUNG, : CIVIL ACTION

:

v. :

:

J.T. MEDDEN, et al., : NO. 03-5432

 ORDER

AND NOW, this 20th day of April, 2010, following a

bench trial held before the Court on July 15 and 16, 2009, and on

October 13, 2009, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, for the reasons set forth

in a Memorandum of today’s date, that:

1. The Court finds for the defendants Lt. Madden,

Officer Wright, Officer Jancoviak, Officer Andrews, Officer

Sivera, and Lt. Radle and against the plaintiff on the

plaintiff’s claims that certain prison officials physically

assaulted him in violation of the Eighth Amendment;

2. The Court finds for the defendants Lt. House,

Officer Hand and Officer Parks and against the plaintiff on the

plaintiff’s claims that certain substances were placed in his

food in violation of the Eighth Amendment;

3. The Court finds for the defendants Lt. Wilt, Lt.

House, Officer Hand and Officer Parks and against the plaintiff

on the plaintiff’s claims that certain prison officials

interfered with the practice of his religion in violation of the
First Amendment and the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized

Persons Act; and

4. The Court finds for the defendants Lt. Wilt, Lt.

House, Officer Hand and Officer Parks and against the plaintiff

on the plaintiff’s claims that certain prison officials

discriminated against him on the basis of his religion in

violation of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Judgment is hereby entered for the defendants and

against the plaintiff. This case is closed.

 

BY THE COURT:

/s/Mary A. McLaughlin 

MARY A. McLAUGHLIN, J.

-2-
Exhibit 32.2

















CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. Section 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with the Amended Annual Report of Shoshone Silver/Gold Mining Company (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A-2 for the year ended September 30, 2012, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “report”), I, John Ryan, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Dated this 20th day of September, 2013.








JOHN RYANJohn RyanChief Financial Officer