alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 31.1****CERTIFICATION**I, Michael Grey, certify that:     1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of SGX Pharmaceuticals, Inc.;     2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;     3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;     4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls andprocedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating tothe registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within thoseentities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures andpresented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourthfiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonablylikely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and     5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):     a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internalcontrol over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’sability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have asignificant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.Date: March 30, 2007/s/ Michael Grey
----

**EXHIBIT      32.2**

**CERTIFICATION        PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350**

| (1) | the                  Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended                  June                  30, 2007 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;                  and |
|-----|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

| (2) | the                  information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material                  respects, the financial condition and results of operations of                  the                  Company. |
|-----|--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|

|  Date: August 20,              2007 | /s/                George M. HareGeorge                M. HareChief                  Financial Officer and Principal                  Accounting                  Officer |
|------------------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
Exhibit 32

    Certification Pursuant To 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant To
                 Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                    AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE
                           SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Form 10-KSB/A Annual Report of Xfone, Inc. (the
"Company") for the period ended December 31, 2003, as filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned
hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

     o    the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     o    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.

Date: June 10, 2004

By: /s/Guy Nissenson
Guy Nissenson
President, Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer,
and Principal Accounting Officer
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

JUDGMENT

No. 04-13-00723-CV

Jad P. HARPER and Juan Carlos Garcia,

Appellants

v.

FARMERS TEXAS COUNTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY and Aslam S. Gilani,

Appellees

From the 293rd Judicial District Court, Maverick County, Texas

Trial Court No. 11-07-26624-MCV

Honorable Cynthia L. Muniz, Judge Presiding

BEFORE JUSTICE BARNARD, JUSTICE MARTINEZ, AND JUSTICE ALVAREZ

In accordance with this court’s opinion of this date, the motion to dismiss is GRANTED 

and this appeal is DISMISSED. 

We order that appellees Farmers Texas County Mutual Insurance Company and Aslam S. 

Gilani recover their costs of this appeal, if any, from appellants Jad P. Harper and Juan Carlos 

Garcia. 

SIGNED April 16, 2014.

_________________________________

Marialyn Barnard, Justice
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PETREA STETCO,

 Petitioner,

 v.

ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General,

 Respondent.

No. 10-72618

Agency No. A098-344-912

MEMORANDUM*

On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted April 10, 2014** 

San Francisco, California

Before: SCHROEDER and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges, and PRATT, Senior

District Judge.*** 

Petitioner, Petrea Stetco, is a Romanian citizen appealing the denial of his

applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention

FILED

MAY 12 2014

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

 * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

 ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

 *** The Honorable Robert W. Pratt, Senior United States District Judge

for the Southern District of Iowa, sitting by designation.
Against Torture. Petitioner claims that he was subject to persecution on the basis

of his Pentecostal Christian faith and that he fears future persecution if returned to

Romania. The agency found him not credible. 

Adverse credibility determinations are reviewed for substantial evidence and

will be upheld unless the evidence compels a different result. He v. Ashcroft, 328

F.3d 593, 595 (9th Cir. 2003). In a pre-REAL ID Act case, any inconsistency

supporting an adverse credibility determination must go to the heart of the claim. 

Li v. Ashcroft, 378 F.3d 959, 962 (9th Cir. 2004).

The heart of Petitioner’s claim is that he was threatened and mistreated on

account of his Pentecostal faith. His prior Canadian petition, however,

inconsistently attributed the same threats and mistreatment to retaliation by the

Romanian mafia and former employees that he had supervised. The inconsistency

is sufficient to support the adverse credibility determination. There is no evidence

compelling a different conclusion.

DENIED. 

2
Before the Second Division,

December 22, 1944

No. 49895.

#### Petition 6409-R of M. De Rosa, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It appeared from the record that this entry was selected by the importer and the examiner to be used as a test case and that the importer disclosed to the examiner all information in his possession. On the record presented the court was of the opinion that the entry was made without any intention to defraud the revenue of the United States or conceal or misrepresent the facts. The petition was therefore granted.
## U.S. DEPARTMENT OF

# TRANSPORTfl~f!; OFFICE OF HEARINGS WASHINGTON, D.C.

IN THE MATTER OF 

## MACH ONE AIR CHARTERS, INC. FDMS NO.: FAA-2015-0643 

## OCT 16 2015

ASSIGNED TO THE HONORABLE RICHARD C. GOODWIN, ALJ. NOTICE OF DEPOSITIONS Pursuantfo 14 CFR 

### § 13.53, section 1004ofthe FederalAviationAct of 1958 (49 U.S.C. 1484) and Rule 26 ofthe Federal Rules ofCivil Procedure, the Respondent by and through his attorney of record will take the following depositions on October 29, 2015 before a Certified Court Reporter and/or Notary Public as follows: JEFFREY S. BUZZELL Director of Maintenance Signature TECHNICAir 513 Eaton Street St. Paul, MN 55107 THOMAS W. THUNSTROM Chief Inspector Signature TECHNICAir 513 Eaton Street St. Paul, MN 55107 CLINT DEMARS Shop Supervisor Signature TECHNICAir 513 Eaton Street St. Paul, MN 55107

Pa e 1 NOTICE OF DEPOSITIONSThe depositions will be taken by Paradign Reporting 

### &Captioning (612) 339-0545 at the offices ofWalsh 

### &Gaertner, 24 East 4th Street, St. Paul, MN 55105.

The time ofthe depositions shall be as follows: JEFFREYS. BUZZELL: Start time: 9:30 a.m. CLINT DEMARS: Starttime: 11:30 a.m. THOMAS W. THUNSTROM:- Starttime: 2:00 p.m

DATED: October 6, 2015 STEVEN L. GRAFF, INC. A Pr sional Law Cor oration

by•



# !~~~~~~~~~~ **~TEVEN** L.



### -:t--~ Attorney at law 43399 Calle De Velardo Temecula, CA 92592 (951) 303-6400 tel (800) 839-7777 toll free aviationcounsel@aol.com Attorney for Respondent

Pa e 2 NOTICE OF DEPOSITIONSCERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I have this day, placed in the United States mail, postage prepaid, a copy of the NOTICE OF DEPOSITIONS [BUZZELL, DEMARS & THUNSTROM] addressed to: GLENN H. BROWN, ESQ. Office ofthe Regional Counsel FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION 222 W. 7TH Avenue #14 Anchorage, Alaska 99513-7586 I herebyfurthercertifythatl havethisday, placed in the United States mail, postage prepaid, the original and copy ofthe NOTICE OF DEPOSITIONS addressed to: FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION The Hearing Docket, AGC-430 WilberWright Building - Room 2W1000 800 Independence Avenue, S.W. Washington, D.C. 20591 I declare under penalty ofperjury underthe laws ofthe state of California that the foregoing istrue and correctand thatthis documentis executed on October6, 2015 at Temecula, California.



### Pa e 3 NOTICE OF DEPOSITIONS
**"'-)~,,'\,**LVl>J ALTITUDE MEDIA U.S. Department of Transportation Docket Management System

1200 New Jersey Ave. SE Washington, DC 20590 Re: Amendment Request Section 333 Exemption No.12517 Dear Sir/Madam, :_; December 1, 2015 Please accept thisas formal petition to amend SKYLVL, LLC's (hereinafter petitioner or operator) section 333 exemption number 12517 toadd the following Suas: 1) DJIInspire 112) DJI Phantom 313) 3DR Solo 4) SenseFiy ebee 15) PrecisionHawk HawkEye LancasterThis petition is being submitted onour own behalf without legal counsel or consulting services. The FAA previously determined the airworthiness ofthe DJIInspire 1in Exemption No. 11295 (RoboFiight Systems LLC). The FAA previously determined the airworthiness ofthe DJI Phantom 3in Exemption No. 12997 (New England Studio LLC). The FAA previously determined the airworthiness ofthe 3DR Solo in Exemption No. 11832 (AUV, LLC). The FAA

previously determined the airworthiness ofthe Precision Hawk HawkEye Lancaster in Exemption No. 11273 (AIG PC Global Services, Inc.). The FAA previously determined the airworthiness ofthe Sensfly ebee in Exemption No. 11263 (SensFiy Ltd.). All operations ofthe additional UAS willbeinfull compliance with the terms ofour current FAA Exemption No. 12517. Since the requested amendment to SKYLVL, LLC would notset any precedent or raise any novel issue, and pecause petitioner seeks to begin these operations without delay, SKYLVL, LLC respectfully requests the FAAto determine that good cause exists to

grant the requested amendment expeditiously by summary means. Based onthe foregoing, Petitioner hereby requests that the FAA grant this petition and provide

such further relief as deemed appropriate forthe operations proposed herein. Please letme know ifyou require additional information in support ofthis petition. Sincerely,**W.Ro-wCA-~**W. Ross Cromartie

Director of Operations SKYLVL, LLC 1712 Mary Street Dallas, TX, 75206
| 1.  | the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and                                |
|----------|------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|     |                                                                                                                                                 |
| 2.       | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company. |

|           |   |                                                                          |
|----------------|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|           |   |                                                                          |   |
| March 18, 2011 | By:    | /s/ Niv Krikov                                                           |   |
|           |   | Niv Krikov                                                                    |   |
|           |   | Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer and Director |   |
|           |   |                                                                          |   |
Before the Third Division,

August 1, 1949

No. 53441.

protests 112192-K, etc. (New York).

#### Lador, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cline, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 871 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 871

  Expressing support for the designation of the week of June 2, 2018, 
      through June 10, 2018, as National Fishing and Boating Week.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                              May 7, 2018

  Mr. Joyce of Ohio (for himself, Mrs. Beatty, Mr. MacArthur, and Ms. 
   Frankel of Florida) submitted the following resolution; which was 
referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in 
  addition to the Committee on Natural Resources, for a period to be 
subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration 
  of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee 
                               concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Expressing support for the designation of the week of June 2, 2018, 
      through June 10, 2018, as National Fishing and Boating Week.

Whereas over 142 million Americans go boating each year, including 71.1 million 
        adults and 70.5 million children;
Whereas the recreational boating industry contributes $121.5 billion to the 
        national economy in direct, indirect, and induced spending, which 
        supports over 34,000 businesses and 650,000 direct and indirect jobs in 
        the United States;
Whereas the Bureau of Economic Analysis of the Department of Commerce has 
        estimated that recreational boating and fishing contributes $38.2 
        billion to the United States gross domestic product;
Whereas 95 percent of boats sold in the United States are made in the United 
        States;
Whereas there are approximately 1,400 active marine manufacturers in the United 
        States, using materials and services contributed from all 50 States;
Whereas boaters are stewards of the environment, contributing $600 million in 
        excise taxes annually to the Sport Fish Restoration and Boating Trust 
        Fund which funds habitat conservation and restoration efforts, 
        preserving our natural resources for future generations; and
Whereas boating provides opportunities for families to be together, appeals to 
        all age groups, and has a beneficial effect on the physical fitness and 
        scholastic performance of those who participate: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) supports the designation of National Fishing and 
        Boating Week; and
            (2) recognizes that the recreational boating community and 
        the boating industry of the United States should be commended 
        for their numerous contributions to the economy of the United 
        States, the well-being of United States citizens, and 
        responsible environmental stewardship of water resources of the 
        United States.
                                 <all>
```
No. 75-1893.

#### Tortorello *v.*United States.

C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 216 (Thursday, November 9, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 77374]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-24728]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 9, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 2, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] Contract 
93 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, 
Docket Nos. MC2024-37, CP2024-37.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2023-24728 Filed 11-8-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
EXHIBIT 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of Bayou City Exploration, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Charles T. Bukowski, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:





1)
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2)
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company





/s/ Charles T. Bukowski


Charles T. Bukowski


Chief Executive Officer and President





November 16, 2010
A90A0280.

#### SMITH v. THE STATE.

(392 SE2d 56)

Banke, Presiding Judge.

The appellant brings this appeal from the denial of his motion for new trial following his conviction of trafficking in cocaine. The appellant lived in a boarding house which was searched pursuant to a warrant in which it was stated that he and another individual were storing and concealing cocaine in “the last room on the right downstairs.” While the search was being carried out, Officer Dix saw a woman knock on the door to the appellant’s room (which adjoined the room referenced in the warrant) and heard her speak with him about retrieving her baby from his room. Dix testified that he saw the appellant open the door at this time and recognized him as being one of *871the persons named in the search warrant. He stated that he approached the appellant, advised him that he was identified in the warrant as having drugs concealed on the premises, advised him of his *Miranda*rights and asked him to surrender any drugs which were in the room. According to the officer, the appellant responded by revealing the location in the room where 85.7 grams of cocaine was concealed. At trial, the appellant denied having cooperated with Dix, testifying that the police kicked in the door to his room and conducted the search without consulting him. On appeal, however, he contends that the search was unlawful because it was based on coerced consent. *Held:*

Decided March 14, 1990.

*Lori Spielberger,*for appellant.

*Lewis R. Slaton, District Attorney, Joseph J. Drolet, Linda Finley, Assistant District Attorneys,*for appellee.

1. OCGA § 17-5-21 (b) provides that “[w]hen the peace officer is in the process of effecting a lawful search, nothing in this Code section shall be construed to preclude him from discovering or seizing . . . any item, substance, object, thing or matter, the possession of which is unlawful. . . .” However, it has been held that “[t]he discovery of the item must . . . have resulted from a bona fide search for the items named in the warrant.” *Cayce v. State,*192 Ga. App. 97, 98 (383 SE2d 648) (1989).

In the present case, the contraband was not discovered in the room named in the warrant but in an adjoining room; however, inasmuch as the appellant was occupying the room, and inasmuch as he was named in the warrant as one of the persons believed to be concealing cocaine on the premises, we conclude that the search of the room was authorized by the warrant. We accordingly hold that the appellant’s consent to the search was not necessary, with the result that his motion to suppress was properly denied.

2. Viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict, the evidence authorized a rational trier of fact to find the appellant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of trafficking in cocaine. See generally *Jackson v. Virginia,*443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Birdsong and Cooper, JJ., concur.*