alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>              9
<MULTIPLIER>           1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          SEP-30-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-1999
<CASH>                                             647
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           6,660
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                     0
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      4,071
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                          38,581
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                            39,704
<LOANS>                                         65,904
<ALLOWANCE>                                        300
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 119,966
<DEPOSITS>                                      81,524
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                531
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             0
<OTHER-SE>                                      37,911
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                 119,966
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                 27,442
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                1,380
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   135
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 4,257
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                               1,863
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,863
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                            2,394
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                  1,648
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    804
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                         531
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       531
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.21
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.21
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    4.12
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                        32
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                   300
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                  300
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                               300
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0
        

</TABLE>
## F IRST 

## D ISTRICT 

## C OURT OF 

## A PPEAL 

## S TATE OF 

## F LORIDA

_____________________________ No. 1D 18

- 2522

_____________________________ F RANCIS R. S WANSON , Petitioner ,

v.
F LORIDA C OMMISSION O N O FFENDER R EVIEW , Respondent

.

_____________________________

Petition f or Writ of Certiorari

— Original Jurisdiction

.

November 6, 2018

P ER C URIAM

. The petition for writ of certiorari is denied on the merits.
R OWE , B ILBREY , and W INSOR , JJ., concur
.

_____________________________ Not final until disposition of any timely an d authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331

.

_____________________________2 Francis R. Swanson, pro se , Petitioner

. Rana Wallace, General Counsel, and Mark Hiers, Assistant General Counsel, Florida Commission on Offender Review , Tallahassee , for Respondent

.
United States Court of Appeals 

for the Fifth Circuit 

No. 22-40190 

Randall T. Greenough, 

Plaintiff—Appellant, 

versus

Sharilla Gray, 

Defendant—Appellee. 

Appeal from the United States District Court 

for the Eastern District of Texas 

USDC No. 9:21-CV-75 

Before Wiener, Elrod, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges.

Per Curiam:*

Randall T. Greenough, an inmate confined at the Polunsky Unit of the 

Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, 

appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for default judgment. 

We previously remanded this case to the district court for the limited 

purpose of clarifying whether a final judgment had issued. On August 29, 

2023, the district court clarified that although it had previously entered final 

*

 This order is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. 

United States Court of Appeals 

Fifth Circuit 

FILED 

September 7, 2023 

Lyle W. Cayce 

Clerk 

Case: 22-40190 Document: 00516886598 Page: 1 Date Filed: 09/07/2023
No. 22-40190 

2 

judgment in Greenough’s case, it had since granted Greenough’s motion to 

alter or amend judgment, which reinstated the case on the court’s active 

docket. Accordingly, this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal. See Adult 

Film Ass’n of Am., Inc. v. Thetford, 776 F.2d 113, 115 (5th Cir. 1985) (holding 

that orders denying default judgment are not subject to interlocutory appeal). 

This case is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. Further, 

Greenough’s outstanding motion for rehearing en banc is DENIED as 

moot, as the opinion on which Greenough seeks rehearing has already been 

withdrawn. 

Case: 22-40190 Document: 00516886598 Page: 2 Date Filed: 09/07/2023
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
       (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
                              UNITED STATES CODE)

     Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sabanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a)
and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) (the
"Act"), I, Mark M. Jacobs, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
of Reliant Resources, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, to the best of my
knowledge:

     (1) The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December
         31, 2001 (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of
         Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition, results of operations and
         cash flows of the Company.




Date: November 12, 2002                                  /s/ Mark M. Jacobs
                                                     ---------------------------
                                                           Mark M. Jacobs
                                                       Executive Vice President
                                                     and Chief Financial Officer





     The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section
906 of the Act and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 214 / Tuesday, November 7, 2023 / Notices 76835 

Dated: October 24, 2023. 

Suhas Tripathi, 

National Coordinator for Health Information 

Technology, Office of the National 

Coordinator for Health Information 

Technology. 

[FR Doc. 2023–24536 Filed 11–3–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4150–45–C 

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND 

HUMAN SERVICES 

Office of the Secretary 

Notice of Interest Rate on Overdue 

Debts 

Section 30.18 of the Department of 

Health and Human Services’ claims 

collection regulations (45 CFR part 30) 

provides that the Secretary shall charge 

an annual rate of interest, which is 

determined and fixed by the Secretary 

of the Treasury after considering private 

consumer rates of interest on the date 

that the Department of Health and 

Human Services becomes entitled to 

recovery. The rate cannot be lower than 

the Department of Treasury’s current 

value of funds rate or the applicable rate 

determined from the ‘‘Schedule of 

Certified Interest Rates with Range of 

Maturities’’ unless the Secretary waives 

interest in whole or part, or a different 

rate is prescribed by statute, contract, or 

repayment agreement. The Secretary of 

the Treasury may revise this rate 

quarterly. The Department of Health and 

Human Services publishes this rate in 

the Federal Register. 

The current rate of 12 1/8%, as fixed 

by the Secretary of the Treasury, is 

certified for the quarter ended 

September 30, 2023. This rate is based 

on the Interest Rates for Specific 

Legislation, ‘‘National Health Services 

Corps Scholarship Program (42 U.S.C. 

254o(b)(1)(A))’’ and ‘‘National Research 

Service Award Program (42 U.S.C. 

288(c)(4)(B)).’’ This interest rate will be 

applied to overdue debt until the 

Department of Health and Human 

Services publishes a revision. 

David C. Horn, 

Director, Office of Financial Policy and 

Reporting. 

[FR Doc. 2023–24568 Filed 11–6–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 4150–04–P 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICESEN07NO23.072</GPH>

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto, intending legally to be bound hereby, have executed 

and delfvered this CommonAgreement as .ofthe date first abovewrltten. 

R<;E: THE.SEQUbl,\PRb~E(:T, INC. Signl!tory: ------,-------

Signature Signature 

By: By: 

Title: Title: 

Date: Date: 

63
Before the Second Division,

November 24, 1959

No. 63534.

protest 58/9522 (New York).

#### Alexander Sacks, D/B/A Danbury Clock Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protest was dismissed.
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 216 (Thursday, November 9, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 77308]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-24784]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[FRL OP-OFA-094]


Environmental Impact Statements; Notice of Availability

    Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General 
Information 202-564-5632 or https://www.epa.gov/nepa.

Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements (EIS)
Filed October 30, 2023 10 a.m. EST Through November 3, 2023 10 a.m. EST
Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9.

    Notice: Section 309(a) of the Clean Air Act requires that EPA make 
public its comments on EISs issued by other Federal agencies. EPA's 
comment letters on EISs are available at: https://cdxapps.epa.gov/cdx-enepa-II/public/action/eis/search.

EIS No. 20230154, Draft, USAF, TX, T-7A Recapitalization at Laughlin 
Air Force Base, Texas, Comment Period Ends: 01/08/2024, Contact: 
Chinling Chen 830-298-5262.
EIS No. 20230155, Draft, BLM, CO, Gunnison Sage-Grouse Resource 
Management Plan Amendment, Comment Period Ends: 02/06/2024, Contact: 
Gina Phillips 970-240-5381.
EIS No. 20230156, Draft, USAF, TX, B-21 Beddown Main Operating Base 2 
or Main Operating Base 3 at Dyess AFB or Whiteman AFB, Comment Period 
Ends: 01/05/2024, Contact: Chris Moore 325-696-4820.
EIS No. 20230157, Draft Supplement, NRC, TX, Generic Environmental 
Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, Supplement 60, 
Regarding License Renewal of Comanche Peak Nuclear Power Plant, Draft 
Report for Comment, Comment Period Ends: 12/26/2023, Contact: Tam Tran 
301-415-3617.
EIS No. 20230158, Draft, BLM, CO, Draft Resource Management Plan 
Amendment (RMPA) and Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) for Big Game 
Habitat Conservation for Oil and Gas Management, Comment Period Ends: 
02/06/2024, Contact: Ashley Phillips 303-239-3948.
EIS No. 20230159, Draft, BLM, UT, Cross-Tie 500Kv Transmission Project, 
Comment Period Ends: 01/02/2024, Contact: Clara Stevens 435-743-3119.

    Dated: November 3, 2023.
Nancy Abrams,
Associate Director, Office of Federal Activities.
[FR Doc. 2023-24784 Filed 11-8-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
Exhibit 32.2

Certification of the Chief Financial Officer

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,

As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of American Apparel Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Adrian Kowalewski, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:



|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the period covered
by the Report.
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 16, 2009



|                        
|------------------------
|/s/    ADRIAN
KOWALEWSKI
|Adrian Kowalewski       
|Chief Financial Officer
# L_2022269EN.01000901.xml

| 17.10.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 269/9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

17.10.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 269/9

---

COUNCIL DECISION (EU) 2022/1951

of 13 October 2022

appointing the Secretary-General of the Council of the European Union for the period from 1 November 2022 to 31 October 2027

THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 240(2), first subparagraph, thereof,

Whereas the Secretary-General of the Council of the European Union should be appointed for the period from 1 November 2022 to 31 October 2027,

HAS ADOPTED THIS DECISION:

Article 1

Ms Thérèse BLANCHET is hereby appointed Secretary-General of the Council of the European Union for the period from 1 November 2022 to 31 October 2027.

Article 2

This Decision shall be notified to Ms Thérèse BLANCHET by the President of the Council.

It shall take effect on the date of its notification.

Article 3

This Decision shall be published in the Official Journal of the European Union.

Done at Luxembourg, 13 October 2022.

For the Council

The President

P. BLAŽEK

---
Before the First Division,

March 25, 1968

No. P68/167.

protests 65/4609, etc. (Philadelphia).

#### John A. Steer Co. *v.*United States,

Maletz, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of coordinato-graphs or parts, dedicated for use therewith, in chief value of metal, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *John A. Steer Company*v. *United States*(53 CCPA 67, C.A.D. 879), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
I Jl L... " 

MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING 

BETWEEN 

THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL ENERGY AGENCY 

BRAZIL 

AND 

THE FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 
In view of the growing and consolidated bilateral cooperation between the Federative 

Republic of Brazil and the United States of America and in recognition of the benefits 

that result from the exchange of information about regulatory experiences and 

practices, the NATIONAL ELECTRICAL ENERGY AGENCY (ANEEL) 1 

on the Brazilian 

side, and the FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION (FERC)2 

on the U.S. 

side, hereby declare their intentions to cooperate through this Memorandum of 

Understanding (MOU). 

I. This MOU identifies topics on which ANEEL and FERC intend to exchange 

technical information as follows: 

a) Experiences and best practices related to the integration into the grid of 

renewable energy, distributed energy resources and demand response; 

b) Smart grid development; 

c) Monitoring and oversight of wholesale energy markets; 

d) Planning and reliability of the electric system; and 

e) Energy storage technologies. 

2. The list of topics above is not exhaustive and ANEEL and FERC may choose 

to cooperate on other issues of mutual interest. 

3. Cooperation under this MOU may include, but is not limited to, the following: 

a) Sharing technical information on energy issues of mutual interest; 

b) Joint visits that could include ANEEL, FERC and other regulatory 

institutions in Brazil and the United States; 

c) Meetings, webinars, workshops, teleconferences and/or email 

exchanges; 

d) Studies that may include the participation of experts from the industrial 

sector; and 

e) Professional training activities. 

4. Nothing contained in this MOU requires either ANEEL or FERC to adopt 

any measure or take any action with respect to any current or future laws, regulations 

and/or policy directive applicable to it. 

1 For further information about A NEEL see http://www.anccl.gov.br/ 2 For further information about FERC see http://www.ferc.gov/default.asp 
1J L.. 

5. ANEEL and FERC activities carried out under this MOU are subj ect to their 

respective programs and policies, and to each institution's resources and priorities. 

6. ANEEL and FERC are responsible for their own resources for the activities 

stipu lated in this MOU. All the activiti es are subj ect to budgetary approval by each 

institution. 

7. Cooperation under this MOU may continue fo r an indefi ni te period. 

8. Both ANEEL and FERC may disconti nue this MOU at any time and for any 

reason, and will stri ve to give the other institution 60 days written notice. 

Signed in Brasili a, Brazil, on December 5, 20 16, in the English and Portuguese languages. 

Commissioner 

On behalf of the Federal Energy Regulatory 

Commission 

Witnesses: 

( 

LJ,,.h., 

~ Andre 

(J 

Pepi

~~~ tone da Not>~ 

Director 

National Electric Energy Agency 

Romeu Donizete Rufino 

Director-General 

On behalf of the National Electric Energy 

Agency 

Tiago de Barros Correa 

Director 

National Electric Energy Agency
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

CAROLINE BEHREND, ET AL : CIVIL ACTION

v. :

COMCAST CORPORATION, ET AL : NO. 03-6604

ORDER

AND NOW, this 18th day of November, 2013, in accordance with Defendants’

letter request of November 15, 2013, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendants shall file a substantive Response to Plaintiffs’ Motion for 

Certification of Revised Philadelphia Class (Docket No. 560) no later than January 15, 2014; and

2. Plaintiffs may file a Reply to Defendants’ Response no later than February 4, 

2014.

BY THE COURT

/s/John R. Padova

_______________________________________

John R. Padova J.

Case 2:03-cv-06604-JP Document 571 Filed 11/18/13 Page 1 of 1
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

962 KA 11-01660 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., FAHEY, SCONIERS, AND VALENTINO, JJ.

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, RESPONDENT,

V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

STANLEY A. KAMINSKI, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

D.J. & J.A. CIRANDO, ESQS., SYRACUSE (BRADLEY E. KEEM OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

GREGORY S. OAKES, DISTRICT ATTORNEY, OSWEGO (COURTNEY E. PETTIT OF COUNSEL), FOR RESPONDENT.

Appeal from a judgment of the Oswego County Court (Walter W. Hafner, Jr., J.), rendered May 13, 2011. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the first degree and driving while ability impaired.

It is hereby ORDERED that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.

Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle in the first degree (Vehicle and Traffic Law § 511 [3] [a]) and driving while ability impaired (§ 1192 [1]). As defendant correctly concedes, he failed to preserve for our review his contention that the conviction is not supported by legally sufficient evidence ( see People v Hines , 97 NY2d 56, 61, rearg denied 97 NY2d 678). In any event, that contention lacks merit ( see generally People v Bleakley , 69 NY2d 490, 495). In addition, viewing the evidence in light of the elements of the crimes as charged to the jury ( see People v Danielson , 9 NY3d 342, 349), we conclude that the verdict is not against the weight of the evidence ( see generally Bleakley , 69 NY2d at 495).

Defendant’s contention that he was deprived of effective assistance of counsel based on defense counsel’s failure to call a certain witness to testify at trial or to seek an adjournment in order to call that witness at trial is based on matters outside the record on appeal, and thus the proper procedural vehicle for raising that contention is by way of a motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 ( see People v Wittman , 103 AD3d 1206, 1206-1207, lv denied 21 NY3d 915; People v King , 90 AD3d 1533, 1534, lv denied 18 NY3d 959). Moreover, inasmuch as “the evidence is legally sufficient to support defendant’s-2- 962 KA 11-01660

conviction . . . , it cannot be said that defense counsel’s failure to renew the motion for a trial order of dismissal constitutes ineffective assistance of counsel” ( People v Pytlak , 99 AD3d 1242, 1243, lv denied 20 NY3d 988; see generally People v Caban , 5 NY3d 143, 152).

Entered: September 27, 2013 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
No. 55809.

protests 163866-K, etc. (New York).

#### Brandeis Youth Foundation et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HOWARD BLAKE TILLMAN, named as

Sir Howard Blake Tillman II,

Plaintiff

- Appellant,

v.

DAVID SHINN, Director; R. CARR, Deputy

Warden; TEDESCO, Unknown: named as

John and Jane Doe Tedesco, Correctional

Officer II; DAVIS, Unknown CO II;
MORRIS, Unknown Complex Warden;

D ’ ARCY DAVIS; UNKNOWN PARTIES,
Named as John and Jane Doe, Morris,
Complex Warden; RODNEY CARR, Deputy

Warden; UNKNOWN PARTIES, Named as

John and Jane Doe, Tedesco,

Defendants

- Appellees. No. 22

- 16869

D.C. No.

2:20

- cv

- 01378

- JAT

- DMF

MEMORANDUM *

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona
James A. Teilborg, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 27, 2024 * *

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent
except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36

- 3.

** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision
without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). 

# FILED

FEB 27 2024

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS2

Before: BENNETT, BADE, and COLLINS, Circuit Judges.

Arizona state prisoner Howard Blake Tillman appeals pro se from the

district court’s order granting s ummary judgment for defendants on his claim,

brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 , alleging an Eighth Amendment violation arising

from unsafe conditions of confinement . We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291 , and w e review de novo. Gordon v. County of Orange , 888 F.3d 1118,

1122 (9th Cir. 2018). We affirm.

The district court properly granted summary judgment in favor of defendants

on Tillman’s conditions

- of

- confinement claim because he f ailed to raise a genuine

dispute of material fact that defendants were deliberately indifferent to a risk to

inmate health or safety that was “sufficiently serious” to establish an Eighth

Amendment violation

. See Farmer v. Brennan , 511 U.S. 825, 832

– 3 4 ( 1994 ).

AFFIRMED.