alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    Exhibit 21.1


                         Subsidiaries of the Registrant



                  Subsidiary
-----------------------------------------------
SpeedFam -- IPEC Corporation...................  Wholly Owned -- Direct
SpeedFam -- IPEC Precision, Inc. ..............  Wholly Owned -- Indirect
SpeedFam -- IPEC Limited.......................  Wholly Owned -- Direct
SpeedFam -- IPEC GmbH..........................  Wholly Owned -- Direct
SpeedFam -- IPEC International Services........  Wholly Owned -- Indirect
SpeedFam -- IPEC Sales, Inc. ..................  Wholly Owned -- Indirect
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2


     CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Jeffrey L. Tepera, certify that:

    1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of W-H Energy
Services, Inc.;

    2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly
report;

    3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

    4. The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(c) and 15d-15(c) for the registrant and we have:

        a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
    disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
    ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its
    consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those
    entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is
    being prepared;

        b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls
    and procedures and presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about
    the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of
    the period covered by this quarterly report based on such evaluation; and

        c) disclosed in this quarterly report any change in the registrant's
    internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the most
    recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely
    to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial
    reporting; and

    5. The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on
our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the
registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors
(or persons performing the equivalent function):

        a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
    operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
    likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
    summarize and report financial information; and

        b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
    employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control
    over financial reporting.


Date: November 13, 2003


     /s/  Jeffrey L. Tepera
-----------------------------------------------------
Name:  Jeffrey L. Tepera
Title: Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Reap. Dec. 10915)

#### John H. Faunce, Phila., Inc. *v.*United States

Entry No. 15365, etc.

(Decided March 16, 1965)

*Sharp & Bogan*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Rao, Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule A, annexed to this decision and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the undersigned, subject to the approval of the Court:

> 1. That the subject merchandise consists of hardboard exported from Sweden as to which the Secretary of the Treasury issued a finding of dumping, published in 89 TD 197, TD 53567, made pursuant to the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C., 160 etseq.).

> 2. That pursuant to Section 168 of said Antidumping Act, the appraiser reported the purchase price (See. 162) and the foreign market value (Sec. 164) as to the merchandise listed on Schedule A attached hereto and made a part hereof.

> 3. That pursuant to Sections 500 and 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, the appraiser appraised all of the merchandise in the appeals for appraisement enumerated on Schedule A for regular duty purposes.

> 4. That the plaintiff duly filed appeals for reappraisement as to the values referred to in the above paragraphs Nos. 2 and 3.

> 5. That at the times relevant herein the purchase price and the foreign market value under the said Antidumping Act are as specified in the aforesaid Schedule A attached hereto.

> 6. That as to all other items of merchandise not identified on Schedule A, the appraiser’s reports of purchase price and of foreign market value are correct.

> 7. That the appraiser’s findings of value under the provisions of Section 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, are correct.

> 8. That said appeals are submitted for decision upon this stipulation and said Schedule A.

Upon the agreed facts, I find foreign market value, as defined in section 164 of the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C. § 164), for the merchandise described in said schedule A, and the purchase price thereof, within section 162 of said act (19 U.S.C. § 162), to be as indicated in said schedule. As to all other items of merchandise not identified in schedule A, I find the foreign market values and the pur*558chase prices to Ibe as reported by the appraiser. In all other respects, the values of all merchandise are as returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
No. 59936.

#### General Wiping Products Co. and J. T. Steeb & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 825144-G and 946687-G (Seattle).

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that 20 percent of the merchandise consists of rags used chiefly for papermaking, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained with"respeet"to said 20j?ercent of the merchandise.
Exhibit 13.1



---



SECTION 906 CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Royal & Sun Alliance Insurance Group plc (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ended December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Andrew Haste, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

Date: June 6, 2006



/s/
          Andrew HasteAndrew
          HasteChief Executive Officer






---
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 596 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 596

  Commending the heroism and achievements of Team USA at the Invictus 
                          Games Toronto 2017.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            October 31, 2017

  Mr. Gallego (for himself and Mr. Wenstrup) submitted the following 
resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, and 
in addition to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, for a 
 period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for 
consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the 
                          committee concerned

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
  Commending the heroism and achievements of Team USA at the Invictus 
                          Games Toronto 2017.

Whereas the Invictus Games were founded in 2014 as a Paralympic-style, 
        multisport event in which wounded, injured, or sick military personnel 
        and veterans take part in 12 adaptive sport competition categories;
Whereas the Latin word ``invictus'' can be translated as ``unconquered'' or 
        ``undefeated'', and those words perfectly capture the indomitable spirit 
        of America's veterans;
Whereas the Invictus Games use the power of sport to inspire recovery, support 
        rehabilitation, and generate a wider understanding of, and respect for, 
        those who bravely serve in uniform;
Whereas the Invictus Games represent an invaluable opportunity for competition, 
        comradery, and achievement for those who have sacrificed for our 
        freedom;
Whereas the Invictus Games serve as a testament to the strength, patriotism, and 
        resilience of all of those who serve our country in uniform;
Whereas the third annual Invictus Games were held in Toronto, Canada, from 
        September 23 to September 30 of 2017;
Whereas 550 wounded, ill, and injured veterans from 17 different countries 
        competed in Toronto's 2017 Games, making them the largest in the history 
        of the event;
Whereas 90 American service men and women proudly represented the United States 
        of America at the 2017 Invictus Games;
Whereas Team USA won over 130 medals, including over 40 gold medals, at the 2017 
        Invictus Games; and
Whereas all the athletes competing in the Invictus Games are worthy of our 
        respect and recognition: Now, therefore, be it
    Resolved, That the House of Representatives--
            (1) commends the mission of the Invictus Games and supports 
        their continued growth in the future;
            (2) honors the heroism of all those participating in the 
        Invictus Games; and
            (3) celebrates the accomplishments of Team USA at the 
        Invictus Games Toronto 2017.
                                 <all>
```
EXHIBIT 32

In connection with the Annual Report of Real Logic, Inc. (the "Company") on Form
10-KSB for the period ending December 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Bradford L. Tolley, Chief
Executive Officer and Treasurer (principal financial officer) of the Company,
certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of his knowledge and belief:

1.   the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2.   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
     respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date:   August 15, 2006

Signed: /s/ Bradford L. Tolley
        ----------------------
Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer
A89A2131.

#### ZILKA v. THE STATE.

(391 SE2d 23)

Cooper, Judge.

Appellant was convicted by a jury of child molestation. On appeal, his sole enumeration of error is that the evidence was not sufficient to support the conviction.

The seven-year-old victim testified that while sitting on appellant’s lap watching television, he unbuttoned her pants and put his hands inside her underpants and rubbed her “private,” then tried to “french kiss” her by putting his tongue in her mouth. “Although corroboration of the victim’s testimony is not necessary in a child molestation case [cit.], there was ample corroboration of the victim’s testimony in the res gestae evidence of the victim’s statements to others soon after the incident.” *Bryson v. State,*192 Ga. App. 261, 263 (384 SE2d 456) (1989). The victim’s sister and another witness testified that immediately following the incident the victim told them what appellant had done to her. The two police officers, who were called to the scene, both testified that the victim told them what appellant had done. The evidence in this case was sufficient for a rational trier of fact to find appellant guilty of child molestation beyond a reasonable doubt. *Jackson v. Virginia,*443 U. S. 307 (99 SC 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979).

*472Decided February 12, 1990.

*Clyde M. Urquhart,*for appellant.

*Glenn Thomas, Jr., District Attorney, Daniel A. Hiatt, Assistant District Attorney,*for appellee.

Appellant filed a supplemental brief attempting to raise errors. Since an enumeration of error may not be amended after the original filing time has expired, we decline to address the matters raised in appellant’s supplemental brief. *Parham v. State,*166 Ga. App. 855 (2) (305 SE2d 599) (1983).

*Judgment affirmed.*

*Deen, P. J., and Birdsong, J., concur.*
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### International Trade Commission

          - [Investigation No. 701-TA-650-651 (Final) (Remand)]

# AGENCY:

U.S. International Trade Commission.

# ACTION:

Notice; correction.

# SUMMARY:

Correction is made to the effective date.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

## Correction

                    In the                     **Federal Register**                     of October 27, 2023 (88 FR 73873) in FR Doc. 2023-23774, on page 73873, in the first column, in the                     **Dates**                     section, the date should be October 23, 2023.                

Issued: October 27, 2023.

Katherine Hiner,

Supervisory Attorney.

[FR Doc. 2023-24182 Filed 11-1-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.2



                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Blue Ridge Energy, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended June 30, 2002 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Forrest
E. Ebbs, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

     (3)  The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (4)  The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
          material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



/s/ Forrest E. Ebbs
----------------------------------------------
Forrest E. Ebbs
Sr. Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
August 14, 2002

                                       23
Before the Third Division,

July 29, 1948

No. 52484.—

protest 58752-K (New York).

#### Windsor Importing Co. *v.*United States,

*188Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoice should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on entry 810898. The protest was sustained to this extent.
Exhibit 32.2








CERTIFICATION OF THE PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER


PURSUANT TO 18 U.S. C. SECTION 1350


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002






In connection with the Annaul Report of Dais Analytic Corporation, (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2010 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Judith C. Norstrud, Principal Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S. C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to my knowledge:




(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13 (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and




(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





Date: June 14, 2011

By:

/s/ Judith C. NorstrudJudith C. NorstrudChief Financial Officer and Treasurer
J

- S04014

- 17

NON - PRECEDENTIAL DECISION - SEE SUPERIOR COURT I.O.P. 65.37
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA

v.

GREGORY HARVEY

Appellant : : : : : : : : : IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF

PENNSYLVANIA

No. 705 EDA 2016 Appeal from the Judgment of Sentence February 29, 2016 In the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County Criminal Division at No(s): CP

- 51

- CR

- 0009209

- 2014

BEFORE: SHOGAN, OTT, JJ., and STEVENS, P.J.E. * CONCURRING STATEMENT BY STEVENS, P.J.E.: FILED MARCH 29, 2017
I join the well

- reasoned Majority but write separately to express my concerns about the current state of the law relative to Possessing Instruments of Crime, 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 9 07(a), (d). We have no choice but to be bound by the precedent set by this Court
in Commonwealth v. Williams , 808 A.2d 213, 215 (Pa.Super. 2002) which held that a walkie

- talkie was not an instrument of crime because it was not used in the crime itself, but rather only facilitated the drug sales. The law must recognize that technology advances provide the criminal element with many means of communication, such as cell phone, instant messaging, twitter, email, and private Facebook messages, for example.

____________________________________________

* Former Justice specially assigned to the Superior Court.J

- S04014

- 17

- 2

-

To allow a specific means of communication, such as a cell phone, to be used to “facilitate” a crime but not be considered an “instrument of crime” frustrates legislative intent and is a distinction without a difference. Clearly, the telephone used to faci litate the delivery of cocaine herein should qualify as an instrument of crime “possessed by the actor under circumstances not manifestly appropriate” for lawful uses. A telephone IS an instrument of crime when it is used as part and parcel of a drug dea l or other crime. I urge the legislature to amend 18 Pa.C.S.A. § 907 to allow for cell phones and other instruments of technology to be “instruments of crime” when used for an illegal purpose and specifically include language that using such instruments t o “facilitate” a crime comes under the definition of instruments of crime.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                           2,861
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   37,658
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,920
<INVENTORY>                                     56,163
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                98,511
<PP&E>                                          84,424
<DEPRECIATION>                                  35,265
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 172,413
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           41,003
<BONDS>                                        145,582
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            18
<OTHER-SE>                                     (15,438)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   172,413
<SALES>                                        111,202
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                               111,202
<CGS>                                           85,754
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   85,754
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                18,394
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               7,399
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                   (345)
<INCOME-TAX>                                      (109)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                               (236)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                      (236)
<EPS-BASIC>                                      (0.12)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                    (0.12)


</TABLE>