alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
----

|   | I,      Scott D. Dorfman, Chief Executive Officer of Innotrac Corporation (the      “Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 as adopted by § 906 of      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:                |
|--------|----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
| (1)    | the      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for three months ended March      31, 2008 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of Section      13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;  and |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
| (2)    | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company.                                                                          |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         |
|   | Dated:  May      15, 2008                                                                                                                                                                                                          |

|   | /s/ Scott D. Dorfman                                 |   |
|--------|------------------------------------------------------|--------|
|   | Scott      D. Dorfman                                |   |
|   | President,      Chief Executive Officer and Chairman |
|   | of      the Board (Principal ExecutiveOfficer)       |
EXHIBIT 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We
consent to the incorporation by reference in registration statements on Form S-3 (No. 333-107295 and 333-107296) and Form S-8
(No. 333-60124, 333-60328, 333-74754, 333-74790, 333-86608, 333-86610, 333-86612, 333-98273,
333-101471, 333-101473, 333-106097 and 333-106098) of Reliant Energy, Inc. of our:



Houston,
Texas
March 14, 2006

---



QuickLinks
No. 67740.

#### Momoi Co. *v.*United States,

protests 59/22312-S, etc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Pord, X

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items marked “A” consist of fish netting similar in all material respects to that involved in Abstract 63947, the merchandise was held dutiable at 25 percent ad valorem under the provision in paragraph 923, as modified by the Japanese Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 53865), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T.D. 53877), for cotton fishing nets, by similitude. The items marked “B,” stipulated to consist of synthetic cord or twine similar in all material respects to the component material of the fish nets involved in said Abstract 63947, were held dutiable, depending upon the date of entry, at 35 percent under paragraph 912 of the act as synthetic cord or twine, similar in use to cotton cords, or at 33, 31%, or 30 percent under said paragraph, as modified by the Sixth Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 54108). The claims of the plaintiff were sustained as to the merchandise which was entered or withdrawn from warehouse prior to September 13, 1958.
No. 51886.

#### Geo. S. Bush & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 965791-G, etc. (Seattle).

*130Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of imitation gut similar in all material respects to that the classification of which was involved in *Bush*v. *United States*(34 C. C. P. A. 17, C. A. D. 338). Upon the established facts and following the cited authority, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 65357.

#### Paramount Import & Export Co. *v.*United States,

protests 241042-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of mother-of-pearl disks similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Paramount Import Export Co. et al.*v. *United States*(45 C.C.P.A. 82, C.A.D. 677), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 767 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 767

      Directing the Chief Administrative Officer of the House of 
Representatives to enter into contracts with nationally- or regionally-
known franchises for the provision of food services in the cafeteria of 
      the Longworth House Office Building in a food court setting.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             March 7, 2018

 Mr. Farenthold submitted the following resolution; which was referred 
                to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
      Directing the Chief Administrative Officer of the House of 
Representatives to enter into contracts with nationally- or regionally-
known franchises for the provision of food services in the cafeteria of 
      the Longworth House Office Building in a food court setting.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. FOOD SERVICE CONTRACTS WITH FRANCHISES FOR LONGWORTH HOUSE 
              OFFICE BUILDING CAFETERIA.

    The Chief Administrative Officer of the House of Representatives 
shall ensure that all food services provided in the cafeteria of the 
Longworth House Office Building are provided under contracts entered 
into by the Chief Administrative Officer with nationally- or 
regionally-known food service franchises under which a variety of 
cuisines are provided to customers in a food court setting.
                                 <all>
```
No. 53934.

#### Frederick Miller *v.*United States,

protest 148570-K (A) (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protest.
Before the Third Division,

July 26, 1949

No. 53430.

protests 904236-G, etc. (New York).

#### Park & Tilford Import Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 61196.

protests 109108-K, etc. (New York).

#### Oscar Evnin, Inc., and W. J. Byrnes & Co. of N. Y., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of platinum fox fur skins, undressed, similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *O. Brager-Larsen*(36 C. C. P. A. 1, C. A. D. 388). The claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was, therefore, sustained.
156 FERC ¶ 61,047

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

18 CFR Part 35

Docket No. RM16-3-000

Ownership Information in Market-Based Rate Filings

(Issued July 21, 2016)

AGENCY: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

ACTION: Withdrawal of Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Termination of 

Rulemaking Proceeding.

SUMMARY: The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (Commission) is 

withdrawing its proposal to amend its regulations to clarify the scope of ownership 

information that sellers seeking to obtain or retain market-based rate authority must 

provide. The Commission is also concurrently issuing a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 

in Docket No. RM16-17-000, which supersedes this proposal. 

DATES: The notice of proposed rulemaking published on December 24, 2015, at 80 FR 

80,302, is withdrawn as of [insert date of publication in the FEDERAL REGISTER]. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ashley Dougherty (Technical Information)

Office of Energy Market Regulation

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

888 First Street, NE

Washington, DC 20426

(202) 502-8851 ashley.dougherty@ferc.gov
Docket No. RM16

-3-000- 2 -

Laura Chipkin (Legal Information)

Office of General Counsel

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

888 First Street, NE

Washington, DC 20426

(202) 502-8615 laura.chipkin@ferc.gov 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
156 FERC ¶ 61,047

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION

Ownership Information in Market-Based Rate Filings Docket No. RM16-3-000

WITHDRAWAL OF NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING AND

TERMINATION OF RULEMAKING PROCEEDING

(Issued July 21, 2016)

1. On December 17, 2015, the Commission issued a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 

(NOPR) in this proceeding.1 For the reasons set forth below, we are exercising our 

discretion to withdraw the NOPR and terminate this rulemaking proceeding.

2. In the NOPR, the Commission proposed to amend its regulations to clarify the 

scope of ownership information that sellers seeking to obtain or retain market-based rate 

authority must provide. The Commission has since developed a new proposal, as 

reflected in a concurrently issued NOPR (Data Collection NOPR),

2

to streamline and 

consolidate the collection of market-based rate (MBR) information with new information 

proposed to be collected for analytics and surveillance purposes. Among other things, in 

the Data Collection NOPR, the Commission proposes to change certain aspects of the 

substance and format of information submitted for MBR purposes, thereby superseding

the proposed clarifications in the instant NOPR.

 

1 Ownership Information in Market-Based Rate Filings, FERC Stats & Regs. 

¶ 32,713 (2015).

2 Data Collection for Analytics and Surveillance and Market-Based Rate 

Purposes, 156 FERC ¶ 61,045 (2016).
Docket No. RM16-3-000 - 2 -

3. The Commission therefore withdraws the NOPR and terminates this rulemaking 

proceeding.

By the Commission.

( S E A L )

Kimberly D. Bose,

Secretary.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   12-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               DEC-31-1998
<CASH>                                           4,669
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   25,318
<ALLOWANCES>                                       275
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                22,567
<PP&E>                                          47,927
<DEPRECIATION>                                   4,576
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  74,385
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                            7,817
<BONDS>                                         14,264
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                        35,341
<OTHER-SE>                                      11,804
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                    74,385
<SALES>                                         14,251
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                21,985
<CGS>                                            9,796
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   16,070
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                   322
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               1,335
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                  6,139
<INCOME-TAX>                                     2,460
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                              3,679
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                     3,679
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                     0.53
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.53
        

</TABLE>
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Securities and Exchange Commission

# TIME AND DATE: 

2:00 p.m. on Thursday, November 9, 2023.

# PLACE: 

The meeting will be held via remote means and/or at the Commission's headquarters, 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549.

# STATUS: 

This meeting will be closed to the public.

# MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: 

Commissioners, Counsel to the Commissioners, the Secretary to the Commission, and recording secretaries will attend the closed meeting. Certain staff members who have an interest in the matters also may be present.

                        In the event that the time, date, or location of this meeting changes, an announcement of the change, along with the new time, date, and/or place of the meeting will be posted on the Commission's website at                         *https://www.sec.gov.*

The General Counsel of the Commission, or her designee, has certified that, in her opinion, one or more of the exemptions set forth in 5 U.S.C. 552b(c)(3), (5), (6), (7), (8), 9(B) and (10) and 17 CFR 200.402(a)(3), (a)(5), (a)(6), (a)(7), (a)(8), (a)(9)(ii) and (a)(10), permit consideration of the scheduled matters at the closed meeting.

The subject matter of the closed meeting will consist of the following topics:

Institution and settlement of injunctive actions;

Institution and settlement of administrative proceedings;

Resolution of litigation claims; and

Other matters relating to examinations and enforcement proceedings.

At times, changes in Commission priorities require alterations in the scheduling of meeting agenda items that may consist of adjudicatory, examination, litigation, or regulatory matters.

# CONTACT PERSON FOR MORE INFORMATION: 

For further information; please contact Vanessa A. Countryman from the Office of the Secretary at (202) 551-5400.

*Authority:*5 U.S.C. 552b.                    

Dated: November 2, 2023.

J. Lynn Taylor,

Assistant Secretary.

[FR Doc. 2023-24636 Filed 11-2-23; 4:15 pm]

BILLING CODE 8011-01-P
Case 2:03-cv-05336-LDD Document 613 Filed 04/30/08 Page 1 of 8
Case 2:03-cv-05336-LDD Document 613 Filed 04/30/08 Page 2 of 8
Case 2:03-cv-05336-LDD Document 613 Filed 04/30/08 Page 3 of 8
Case 2:03-cv-05336-LDD Document 613 Filed 04/30/08 Page 4 of 8
Case 2:03-cv-05336-LDD Document 613 Filed 04/30/08 Page 5 of 8
Case 2:03-cv-05336-LDD Document 613 Filed 04/30/08 Page 6 of 8
Case 2:03-cv-05336-LDD Document 613 Filed 04/30/08 Page 7 of 8
Case 2:03-cv-05336-LDD Document 613 Filed 04/30/08 Page 8 of 8
Case No. 13,676.

#### SWANN v. SCHOLFIELD.

[2 Cranch, C. C. 140.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

April Term, 1817.

Parties — Assignee of Note.

After a note is taken up by the indorser, its negotiability ceases, and he cannot, by transferring the note, assign his right of action at law, so as to enable the assignee to sue in his own name.

Assumpsit [by W. T. Swann, for the Real Estate Bank, against Jonathan Sebolfield] on the defendant’s promissory note, indorsed by Thompson Simpson, and George Bruce, Jun. The note when due, was taken up by the discount of notes of Bruce indorsed by Simpson, and afterwards returned by Bruce to the bank, who brought suit in the name of W. T. Swann, as indorsee.

THE COURT

(THRUSTON, Circuit Judge, absent),

instructed the jury, that after the

note was taken up by Bruce, its negotiability ceased, and he could not'assign his right of action at law to the plaintiff, so as to enable him to sue in his own name.
Case No. 6,661.

#### The HOMELY.

[8 Ben. 495.) *1*

District Court, E. D. New York.

July, 1876.

Salvase — Tug and Tow. .

1. A tug having a brig in tow to bring into the harbor of New York carelessly ran her aground on the Romer Shoal, off Sandy Hook, and was unable to pull her off. But on the next morning another tug coming to the spot, the master of the brig made an agreement to be towed off for $2500, and the two tugs got the brig off: *Held,*that the agreement was exorbitant, and that $1250 was a sufficient compensation for the service.

[Cited in Brooks v. The Adirondack, 2 Fed. 393.)

2. The second tug was entitled to half of that sum as salvage, but the first one, having been the cause of the disaster, could not be allowed to participate.

[Cited in Greenwood v. The Fletcher and Grapeshot. 42 Fed. 504.)

An English brig, the Homely, coming at night, loaded, into the harbor of New York, engaged a tug, the C. F. Ackerman, to take her up the bay, on a hawser. The brig drew 14 feet, and the tug was notified that she-drew so much and was directed to keep a north-west course and in deep water; but no further directions were given or control taken by the pilot on the brig. No one was-on the stern of the tug to receive signals from any one on the brig, and the tug proceeding on the course of her own selection presently brought the brig aground on the-tail of the Romer Shoal. The tug left her, being unable to pull her off and next morning a larger tug appeared, the Weed, and the captains of the two tugs consulted together and proposed to the brig to take her off for $2500. The master, under compulsion,, assented, and the tugs pulled the brig off the shoal and brought her up to the dock. The weather was still and the vessel not in immediate danger. The owners of the brig resisted the payment of the $2500 as exorbitant,, and thereupon the owners of the two tugs libelled the brig for salvage.

Butler, Stillman & Hubbard, for libellants.

Scudder & Carter, for claimants.

BENEDICT, District Judge.

It appears tome that the sum of $2500 is too large compensation for the service rendered. For such a service rendered, under the circumstances, $1250 would be a reasonable and not illiberal reward.

But I do not consider the Ackerman entitled to any compensation for her portion: of this service, for the reason that by her negligence the brig was placed in the position to require the assistance rendered. L am unwilling to permit that a tug employed to tow a vessel into the port should, through want of care, tow the vessel upon the Romer Shoal and then receive salvage compensation for towing her off. For the services performed by the Weed, in assisting to tow "the brig off the shoal, a proper compensation may be awarded, but in that compensation the Ackerman cannot be permitted to-share.

There will, therefore, be a decree in favor of the owners of the Weed for the sum of $625, with the costs of this action, and the claim of the owners of the Ackerman will be-disallowed.
No. 50322.

#### Protests 58702-K, etc., of R. H. Macy & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within Jhe holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83, decided February 5, 1945.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries. The protests were sustained to this extent.
Exhibit
      23.1


CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS




To
      the Board of DirectorsXfone,Inc. 960 High Road London, N12
      9RYUK






Gentlemen:






We consent
      to the inclusion of our Report of Registered Public Accounting Firm March 31,
      2005, with respect to the financial statements of Xfone, Inc. and subsidiaries
      for the year ended December 31, 2004, in the upcoming filing of its Form 10-KSB,
      for Xfone, Inc.






Yours
              truly,BY: /S/ CHAIFETZ & SCHREIBER,
              P.C.——————————————CHAIFETZ & SCHREIBER, P.C.Port
              Washington, New York March 30,
              2006
Before the Second Division,

March 26, 1958

No. 61734.

#### Goody Novelty Company *v.*United States,

protest 303892-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protest was dismissed.
----

|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   | I,      Scott D. Dorfman, Chief Executive Officer of Innotrac Corporation (the      “Company”), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 as adopted by § 906 of      the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:                               |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
| (1)    | the      Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three and six months      ended June 30, 2009 (the “Report”) fully complies with the requirements of      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;      and |
|   |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        |
| (2)    | the      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the      Company.                                                                                         |

|   | Dated:      August 14, 2009                                                                                             |
|--------|-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|   |                                                                                                                    |
|   | /s/      Scott D. Dorfman                                                                                               |   |
|   | Scott      D. DorfmanPresident,      Chief Executive Officer and Chairmanof      the Board (Principal ExecutiveOfficer) |