alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

, Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Stephen J. Markman

Mary Beth Kelly

Brian K. Zahra

Bridget M. McCormack

David F. Viviano

, Justices

I, Larry S. Royster , Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.

June 20, 2014

d0617 

# Order

Clerk June 20, 2014

148305 & (63)

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN,

Plaintiff

- Appellee,

v SC: 148305

COA: 304935

Genesee CC: 08

- 023581

- FC

FERONDA MONTRE SMITH,

Defendant

- Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion for leave to file pro per supplemental action is

GRANTED. The application for leave to appeal the October 29, 2013 judgment of the

Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED, limited to the issues: (1) whether

the defendant was deprived of his constitutional right to a speedy trial; and (2) whether

the defendant was deprived of his due process right t o a fair trial through the presentation

of perjured testimony.
Order entered November 3, 2015

In The

Court of Appeals 

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas 

No. 05-15-00689-CR

AMON TAWANDA DZWAIRO, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 219th Judicial District Court

Collin County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 219-82237-2013

ORDER

The Court GRANTS court reporter Indu A. Bailey’s motion for extension of time to file 

the reporter’s record.

We ORDER Ms. Bailey to file the reporter’s record within FIVE (5) DAYS from the 

date of this order.

/s/ ADA BROWN 

JUSTICE
No. 57597.

#### F. B. Vandegrift & Co. *v.*United States,

protest 191759-K (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the net weight of the wool in question, as imported, was 18,513 pounds, rather than 22,252 pounds, the collector was directed to refund all duties taken in excess.
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.1



                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
                            W-H ENERGY SERVICES, INC.
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


         In connection with the accompanying report on Form 10-Q for the period
ended June 30, 2003 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Kenneth T. White, Jr., the Chief Executive
Officer of W-H Energy Services, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, to my
knowledge, that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company in
respect of those items required to be described or presented in such Report
under Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

                                                /s/  Kenneth T. White, Jr.
                                                -------------------------------
                                                Name: Kenneth T. White, Jr.
                                                Date: August 14, 2003


This certification is furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be deemed to be a part of the Report or
"filed" for any purpose whatsoever.
No. 62946.

#### J. B. Henriques, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 304863-K, 264512-K, and 268942-K (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of acrylic resin, made into partly finished articles, similar in all material respects to the merchandise the subject of *J. B. Herniques, Inc.*v. *United States*(46 C.C.P.A. 54, C.A.D. 695), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 04-8004

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, versus DIA APRIL MONTAGUE, Defendant - Appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CR-98-205; CA-04-3511-DKC) Submitted: November 17, 2005 Decided: November 22, 2005 Before WILKINSON, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Dia April Montague, Appellant Pro Se. Stuart A. Berman, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Dia April Montague, a federal prisoner, seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on her 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion. An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed by a district court absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find both that the district court’s assessment of her constitutional claims is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural rulings by the district court are also debatable or wrong. SeeMiller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Montague has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
ROLLING THUNDER EXPLORATION LTD.

AUDIT COMMITTEE CHAIR

POSITION DESCRIPTION



Appointment



1.

The Chair of the Audit Committee will be appointed, serve and be removed at the pleasure of the Board.



Duties of the Audit Committee Chair



2.

In addition to fulfilling his or her duties as an individual director, the duties of the Audit Committee Chair are to:



(a)

serve as the Audit Committees role model for responsible, ethical and effective decision making;



(b)

lead the Audit Committee in discharging all duties set out in the Audit Committee Charter;



(c)

take reasonable steps to ensure that the Audit Committee members execute their duties pursuant to their Mandate;



(d)

manage the affairs of the Audit Committee to ensure that the Audit Committee is organized properly and functions effectively;



(e)

ensure that notice of all meetings of the Audit Committee are provided to the external auditor;



(f)

preside at, and together with the members of the Audit Committee, management, external auditors and advisors, as appropriate, call, schedule and prepare the agenda for each meeting of the Audit Committee;



(g)

ensure that the Audit Committee meets in closed sessions with the external auditors;



(h)

coordinate with the CFO, Corporate Secretary, management and the external auditors to ensure that:



(i)

documents are delivered to members in sufficient time in advance of Audit Committee meetings for a thorough review;



(ii)

matters are properly presented for the members consideration at meetings;



(iii)

the members have an appropriate opportunity to discuss issues at each meeting;



(iv)

the members have an appropriate opportunity to question management, employees and the external auditors regarding financial results, internal controls, the collection of financial information and all other matters of importance to the Audit Committee; and



(v)

the members work constructively towards their recommendations to the Board;



(i)

communicate with each Audit Committee member to ensure that:



(i)

each member has the opportunity to be heard and participate in decision making; and



(ii)

each member is accountable to the Audit Committee;



(j)

arrange for the preparation, accuracy and distribution of all minutes of the Audit Committee to:



(i)

members of the Audit Committee;



(ii)

each member of the Board;



(iii)

the external auditor; and



(iv)

the CEO and CFO;



(k)

ensure that the Audit Committee, following each meeting:



(i)

reports to the Board regarding its activities, findings and recommendations; and



(ii)

makes Committee information available to any director upon request; and



(l)

assist in maintaining effective working relationships between Committee members, the Board, the CEO and CFO, external auditors, advisors, executive officers and management.





APPROVED BY THE BOARD ●, 2006
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 66-5 Filed 08/14/2009 Page 1 of 17
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 66-5 Filed 08/14/2009 Page 2 of 17
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 66-5 Filed 08/14/2009 Page 3 of 17
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 66-5 Filed 08/14/2009 Page 4 of 17
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 66-5 Filed 08/14/2009 Page 5 of 17
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 66-5 Filed 08/14/2009 Page 6 of 17
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 66-5 Filed 08/14/2009 Page 7 of 17
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 66-5 Filed 08/14/2009 Page 8 of 17
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 66-5 Filed 08/14/2009 Page 9 of 17
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 66-5 Filed 08/14/2009 Page 10 of 17
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 66-5 Filed 08/14/2009 Page 11 of 17
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 66-5 Filed 08/14/2009 Page 12 of 17
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 66-5 Filed 08/14/2009 Page 13 of 17
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 66-5 Filed 08/14/2009 Page 14 of 17
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 66-5 Filed 08/14/2009 Page 15 of 17
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 66-5 Filed 08/14/2009 Page 16 of 17
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 66-5 Filed 08/14/2009 Page 17 of 17
No. 52490.

protests 54493-K and 62288-K (New York).

#### D. Strauss & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries involved. The protests were sustained to this extent.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ANGELA MARTIN : CIVIL ACTION

:

 v. :

:

L.F. LAMBERT SPAWN CO., INC. : NO. 02-2754

O R D E R

AND NOW, this 16th day of October2, 2002, it is Ordered that the Rule 16 Conference

by telephone in the above captioned case is RESCHEDULED to October 31, 2002 at 4:30 p.m. Plaintiff's

counsel shall initiate the telephone call. Judge McLaughlin's chambers telephone number is 267-299-

7600.

ATTEST: or BY THE COURT

BY: 

 Carol D. James, Deputy Clerk MARY A. McLAUGHLIN, J.

FAXED AND MAILED 10/16/02:

 Michael Moore, Esq.

 Robin Gray, Esq.

Civ 12 (9/83)

Case 2:02-cv-02754-MAM Document 4 Filed 10/16/2002 Page 1 of 1
Before the First Division,

May 23, 1963

No. 67742.

#### Ross Products, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 59/12864 and 59/12788 (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *Falcon Sales Company*and *J. J. Murphy & Co.*v. *United States*(47 Cust. Ct. 129, C.D. 2292), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Bepore Judge Watson-,

November 1, 1967

No. R67/118.

#### W. M. Stone & Company, a/c Philipp Bros. Chemicals et al. *v.*United States, reappraisements R58/14940, etc. (Norfolk).

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise, facts, and issues are the same in all material respects as those in *United States*v. *Philipp Bros.*Chemicals, *Inc.*(56 Cust. Ct. 816, A.R.D. 208), the court found and held that United States value, as that value is defined in section 402 (e), Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, is the proper basis for the determination of the value of the sodium peroxide involved and that such value was $0.129245 per pound, net, packed.
# Reasons to Reclass List

# Questionnaire

# Reclass Template

# Reclassifications Reported

# Source Transactions Reported
# C_2015127EN.01003501.xml

| 20.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 127/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 127/35

---

Action brought on 20 February 2015 — Navitar v OHIM — Elukuva (NaviTar)

(Case T-93/15)

(2015/C 127/48)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Navitar, Inc. (Rochester, United States) (represented by: J. Mattes, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: MTÜ Elukuva (Tallinn, Estonia)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Applicant: Applicant

Applicant:

Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘NaviTar’ — Application for registration No 11 147 246

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before OHIM:

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 5 December 2014 in Case R 401/2014-4

Contested decision:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs, including those incurred by the applicant before the Board of Appeal; |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs, including those incurred by the applicant before the Board of Appeal;

| — | order MTÜ Elukuva to pay the costs, including those incurred by the applicant before the Board of Appeal, in case MTÜ Elukuva should become an intervening party in this case. |
| --- | --- |

—

order MTÜ Elukuva to pay the costs, including those incurred by the applicant before the Board of Appeal, in case MTÜ Elukuva should become an intervening party in this case.

Plea(s) in law

Plea(s) in law

| — | Infringement of Article 41(1) in conjunction with Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 41(1) in conjunction with Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
cc: Kevin Kennedy 

Attorney General/Carson City 

White Pine County District Attorney 

White Pine County Clerk 

SUPREME COURT 

OF 

NEVADA 

2 

(0) 1947A
軍役人員抵押貸款救濟選項

房地美致力於幫助軍役人員避免止贖

如果您的抵押貸款由房地美擁有,並且您支付抵押貸款付款有困難,您需要盡快與貸款機構(又稱為抵押貸

款服務商)討論。您也可以打電話給房地美客戶支持中心,電話號碼是1-800-FREDDIE,選擇2。

房地美抵押貸款救濟選項 

 再融資:透過再融資,您可以獲得新的貸款和新的條款,這或許可以將您的月支付額降到更容易承受的

水準。如果您的房屋淨值很少或者沒有淨值,並且無法進行傳統的再融資,您或許可以透過聯邦住宅可

負擔再融資計劃(英文簡稱為HARP)進行再融資。

 債務償還期延展:如果您面臨短期的經濟困難,並且在償還抵押貸款方面需要暫時的援助,貸款機構可為

您提供「債務償還期延展」。透過這個選項,貸款機構可暫時降低您的抵押貸款付款,或者暫停抵押貸款

付款,直到您的財務狀況恢復正常。

 恢復原狀或償還計劃:如果您因為短期的財務困難而拖欠抵押貸款幾個月,但現在您的財務狀況已恢復

正常,則您可以申請恢復原狀或參加償還計劃。這兩個選項允許您透過一次總付金額補足錯過的付款和

延誤費,或者將逾期的付款與例行的每月付款額合併,在固定的期限內償還,從而使您的抵押貸款恢復

原狀。

 貸款修改:如果您拖欠抵押貸款,或者預計不久之後會拖欠抵押貸款,您可以與貸款機構一起修改抵押貸

款的一項或多項條款,使您的付款變得更容易負擔和承受。請務必詢問您的貸款機構,瞭解聯邦政府的住

宅可負擔修正計劃(英文簡稱為HAMP)、房地美標準貸款修改選項及其他貸款修改選項。

 短售或轉讓產權以避免止贖的交易:如果您沒有能力繼續擁有房屋,而且沒有別的辦法來避免止贖或者

您不想保住房屋,短售或轉讓產權以避免止贖的交易可以幫助您體面地放棄房屋,避免止贖對財務和感

情上帶來的打擊。

 利率減免:在您服役期間以及在服役期滿後一年內,您或許可以將抵押貸款的利率上限固定為每年6%。

房地美將永久性更換基地(英文簡稱為PCS)的命令視為一種經濟困難。如果您因為接到PCS命令而需要遷

移,我們可以考慮為您提供避免止贖的替代方案。

謹防止贖援助騙局和短售欺詐!瀏覽 

http://myhome.freddiemac.com/mortgage-help/avoid_fraud.html 

瞭解更多資訊。

如需更多資訊:

瀏覽http://myhome.freddiemac.com/mortgage-help/military-assistance.html,或打電話給房地美客戶支持

中心,電話號碼是1-800-FREDDIE,選擇2。

出版編號905 ■ 2015年6月
##### 



Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Virage Logic Corporation (the
Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ending March 31, 2003 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, James
R. Pekarsky, Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ James R. Pekarsky

James R. Pekarsky
Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer
May 15, 2003
BEFORE THE

DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WASHINGTON, D.C.

__________________________________________ )

Joint Application of ) ) AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. )

and ) DOCKET OST- 20 00- 6824
CATHAY PACIFIC AIRWAYS LIMITED ) )

under 14 CFR Part 212 for statements of ) authorization (code

- sharing) ) __________________________________________)

JOINT NOTICE OF AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC.

AND CATHAY PACIFIC AIRWAYS LIMITED

OF ADDITIONAL CODESHARING

Communications with respect to this document should be sent to:

John R. Mietus, Jr. LAW OFFICE OF JOHN MIETUS, LLC 6701 Democracy Boulevard Ste 300 Bethesda, Maryland 20817 (202) 747

- 5212 john@mietuslaw.com

Counsel for CATHAY PACIFIC Robert A. Wirick Managing Director, Regulatory and

International Affairs

A MERICAN AIRLINES, INC. P.O. Box 619616, MD 5635

D FW Ai rport, Texas 75161 (817) 963

- 0394
robert.wirick@aa.com

S eptember 3, 2014
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

PUBLIC MEETING ON THE TEST PROCEDURE FOR

COMMERCIAL REFRIGERATION EQUIPMENT

U.S. Department of Energy

1000 Independence Avenue, SW.

Washington, DC 20585

Thursday, December 5, 2013

Room 8E-089

Purpose

The Department of Energy (DOE) seeks comments, information, and data from interested parties on 

the notice of proposed rulemaking addressing changes to the test procedure for commercial 

refrigeration equipment (CRE).

Agenda

9:00 – 9:05 am Welcome, Introductions, Agenda Review, & Opening Statements

Doug Brookman

Interested parties make a brief summary of their comments.

9:05 – 9:15 am Rulemaking History & Timeline

Charles Llenza

Summary of the statutory background, regulatory process, and 

schedule for this rulemaking. 

9:15 – 10:30 am Test Procedure Scope & Definitions

Sarah Widder

Summary presentation and discussion regarding the scope of covered

commercial refrigeration equipment and new definitions to clarify the

application of standard and test procedures to covered equipment.

10:30 – 10:45 am Break

10:45– 11:30 am Clarifications to the Test Procedure

Collin Weber

Summary presentation and discussion regarding the clarifications to 

the DOE test procedure in response to inquiries from interested parties 

andresulting from the negotiated rulemaking process (Docket No. 

EERE-2013-BT-NOC-0023)

11:30 – 11:40 am Break
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

PUBLIC MEETING ON THE TEST PROCEDURE FOR

COMMERCIAL REFRIGERATION EQUIPMENT

U.S. Department of Energy

1000 Independence Avenue, SW.

Washington, DC 20585

Thursday, December 5, 2013

Room 8E-089

Agenda (cont.)

11:40 – 11:50 am Other Test Procedure Issues

Sarah Widder

Summary presentation and discussion regarding the several other issues 

regarding conduct of the DOE test procedure, including rounding of test 

results, the lowest application product temperature provisions, 

clarifications in response to Interpretations to AHRI 1200-2010, 

determination of total display area, and the compliance date of DOEs 

current and amended test procedures.

11:50 – 12:15 pm Discussion of TDA Calculation Methodology

Ashley Armstrong

Summary presentation and discussion regarding the methodology for 

calculating total display area (TDA) in the DOE TP.

12:15– 1:30 pm Closing Remarks & Contacts & Information

Charles Llenza

Final discussions on issues and closing remarks.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

         In connection with the Quarterly Report of Dragon International Group
Corp. on Form 10-QSB/A for the period ending September 30, 2007 as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, I, David Wu, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.


February 12, 2008


                                        By: /s/ David Wu
                                        ----------------
                                        David Wu, CEO
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 12A

                             Cedar Brakes I, L.L.C.
               Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
                      (In Thousands, Except Ratio Amounts)
<Table>
<Caption>
                                                                         Period From Inception (March 3, 2000)
                                                     Year Ended                         to
                                                  December 31, 2001              December 31, 2000
                                                  ------------------     -------------------------------------
<S>                                               <C>                    <C>
Loss from Continuing Operations                        $(38,988)                       $(3,132)

Add: Fixed Charges                                       26,959                          7,055
                                                       --------                        -------
Earnings                                                (12,029)                         3,923
                                                       --------                        -------
Fixed Charges:
          Interest expense and capitalized amounts
              (including construction and related
              fixed charges)                             26,445                          6,894
          Net amortization of issuance costs
              (including capitalized amounts)               514                            161
                                                       --------                        -------
Total Fixed Charges                                    $ 26,959                        $ 7,055
                                                       ========                        =======
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges                           --(1)                          --(2)
                                                       ========                        =======
</Table>
-----------
(1)  Earnings were inadequate to cover fixed charges by $38,988 thousand
     for the year ended December 31, 2001.

(2)  Earnings were inadequate to cover fixed charges by $3,132 thousand from
     inception to December 31, 2000.