alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In connection with the Annual Report of China Nuvo Solar Energy, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K/A for the period ended July 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Barry S. Hollander, Principal Accounting Officer, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





1.
The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





2.
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company, as of, and for the periods presented in the Report.





/s/ Barry S. HollanderBarry S. HollanderPrincipal Accounting OfficerFebruary 11, 2011




A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to China Nuvo Solar Energy, Inc. and will be retained by China Nuvo Solar Energy, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

MICHAEL A. COLEMAN : CIVIL ACTION

:

 v. :

:

DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al. : NO. 02-4102

ORDER

AND NOW, this ___ day of April, 2003, upon

consideration of plaintiff’s Settlement Proposal, it is hereby

ORDERED that the Proposal is DENIED AS MOOT, inasmuch as the

above action has been dismissed by Order of the court with leave

to refile in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of

Pennsylvania.

BY THE COURT:

________________________

JAMES T. GILES C.J.

copies by FAX on

to

Case 2:02-cv-04102-JG Document 8 Filed 04/10/2003 Page 1 of 1
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2


                    CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
                            W-H ENERGY SERVICES, INC.
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350


         In connection with the quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period
ended March 31, 2004 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Jeffrey L. Tepera, the Chief Financial Officer of
W-H Energy Services, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, to my knowledge,
that:

1. The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

                                                 /s/ Jeffrey L. Tepera
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 Name: Jeffrey L. Tepera
                                                 Date: May 7, 2004


This certification is furnished solely to comply with the requirements of Rule
13a-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
is subject to the knowledge standard contained therein and shall not be deemed
to be a part of the Report or "filed" for any purpose whatsoever.
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 14**  **- 6066** 

JAMES MICHAEL LUCAS , Petitioner

- Appellant ,
v. MICHAEL MCCALL, Warden of the Lee Correctional Institution , Respondent

- Appellee
.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina , at Aiken
. Timothy M. Cain , District Judge. ( 1:12

- cv - 02879

- TMC )

Submitted : April 30, 2014 Decided: May 13, 2014

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KEENAN , Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by un published per curiam opinion
. James Michael Lucas, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 P ER CURIAM: James Michael Lucas seeks to appeal the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2012) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issue s a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C.
§ 2253(c)(1) (A) (2012) . A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2012)
. When the district court denies reli ef on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see Miller

- El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336

- 38 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack , 529 U.S. at 484

- 85. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Lucas has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability, deny Lucas’ motion to appoint counsel, deny leav e to proceed in forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the3 facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before th is court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Small Business Administration

          - [Disaster Declaration #18185 and #18186; OKLAHOMA Disaster Number OK-00172]

# AGENCY:

Small Business Administration.

# ACTION:

Amendment 1.

# SUMMARY:

This is an amendment of the Administrative disaster declaration of a rural area for the State of Oklahoma dated 09/20/2023.

*Incident:*                         Rural Area—Severe Storms, Straight-Line Winds and Tornadoes.                    

*Incident Period:*                         06/14/2023 through 06/18/2023.                    

# DATES:

Issued on 10/20/2023.

*Physical Loan Application Deadline Date:*                        11/20/2023.                    

*Economic Injury (EIDL) Loan Application Deadline Date:*                         06/20/2024.                    

# ADDRESSES:

Submit completed loan applications to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth, TX 76155.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Alan Escobar, Office of Disaster Recovery & Resilience, U.S. Small Business Administration, 409 3rd Street SW, Suite 6050, Washington, DC 20416, (202) 205-6734.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

The notice of an Administrative disaster declaration of a rural area for the State of Oklahoma, dated 09/20/2023 is hereby amended to include the following areas as adversely affected by the disaster.

*Primary Counties:*                     Pushmataha.                

All other information in the original declaration remains unchanged.

(Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number 59008)

Isabella Guzman,

Administrator.

[FR Doc. 2023-23745 Filed 10-26-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 8026-09-P
C OURT OF A PPEALS FOR THE

F IRST D ISTRICT OF T EXAS AT H OUSTON

O RDER

Appellate case name: Dexter Keith Royston v. The State of Texas

Appellate case number: 01

- 1 5

- 00 6 05

- CR

Trial court case number: 7 3 277

Trial court: 300 th District Court of Brazoria County, Texas

Appellant’s court

- appointed counsel filed a brief concluding that the above

referenced appeal is frivolous. See Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S. Ct.

1396, 1400 (1967). Appellant, acting pro se, has filed a motion requesting a ccess to a copy of the appellate record for use in preparing a response to appointed counsel’s brief.

See Kelly v. State , 436 S.W.3d 313, 315, 318

– 20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014).

We grant the motion and order the trial court clerk, no later than 10 days from

the date of this order, to provide a copy of the record, including the clerk’s record, the

reporter’s record, and any supplemental records, to the appellant. The trial court clerk

shall further certify to this Court, within 15 days of the date of this ord er, the date upon

which delivery of the record to the appellant is made.

Appellant’s response to his appointed counsel’s brief shall be filed within 45

days of the date of this order.

It is so ORDERED.

Judge’s signature: /s/ Russell Lloyd

 Acting individually

Date: February 18, 2016
# C_2015245EN.01003601.xml

| 27.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 245/36 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 245/36

---

Action brought on 21 May 2015 — Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona v Commission

(Case T-253/15)

(2015/C 245/42)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona (Barcelona, Spain) (represented by: J. de Juan Casadevall, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Forms of order sought

Forms of order sought

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | in the alternative, if the main claim is rejected, annul the contested decision insofar as it does not limit the recovery order to indirect acquisitions made after 21 December 2007, and does not recognise the right to full application of tax concessions during the entire period provided for in Article 12.5 of the Royal Legislative Decree 4/2004 of 5 March approving the Texto Refundido de la Ley del Impuesto sobre Sociedades (the consolidated text of the Spanish Company Tax Act), and |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative, if the main claim is rejected, annul the contested decision insofar as it does not limit the recovery order to indirect acquisitions made after 21 December 2007, and does not recognise the right to full application of tax concessions during the entire period provided for in Article 12.5 of the Royal Legislative Decree 4/2004 of 5 March approving the Texto Refundido de la Ley del Impuesto sobre Sociedades (the consolidated text of the Spanish Company Tax Act), and

| — | order the European Commission to bear the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the European Commission to bear the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The contested decision in these proceedings is the same as that in Cases T-12/15, Banco de Santander and Santusa v Commission, and T-252/15 Ferrovial SA and others v Commission.

Banco de Santander and Santusa

Commission

Ferrovial SA and others

Commission

The pleas and main arguments relied on are similar to those already raised in those cases.

It is claimed in particular that there was an error in law in the application of the selectivity criterion, that there was a misuse of powers and an infringement of the principles of equality and legitimate expectations.

---
Before the Third Division,

January 24, 1952

No. 56298.

protests 157636-K and 157637-K (Galveston).

#### W. R. Zanes and Company *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the Federal Reserve bank certified dual rates of exchange for the currency involved in the liquidation of the entries for the dates of exportation of the merchandise covered by the entries and that the circumstances relating to the liquidation of the said entries are similar in all material respects to those in Abstract 54732. In view of this stipulation and following the cited decision it was held that the currency of the invoices should have been converted in the manner directed by the judgment of this court in said Abstract 54732, in accordance with Bureau of Customs Circular Letter No. 2675, dated October 19, 1949.
Before the First Division,

February 17, 1954

No. 57853.

protest 211705-K (New York).

#### Walco Bead Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of articles in chief value of glass beads the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Walco Bead Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 62, C. D. 1445), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
<PAGE>

                                  EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of Home Loan Financial Corporation (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date of this Certification (the
"Report"), I, Preston W. Bair, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

            1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
            15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of the Company.

/s/ Preston W. Bair
------------------------------------
Preston W. Bair, Chief Financial Officer

Date: May 17, 2004

                                                                             37.
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6372

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. RAYFORD KNIGHT, a/k/a Cherokee, a/k/a Chief, Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Benson Everett Legg, District Judge. (1:93-cr-00022-BEL-1)

Submitted: January 19, 2010 Decided: January 26, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Rayford Knight, Appellant Pro Se. John Francis Purcell, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: Rayford Knight seeks to appe al the district court’s order denying his “Motion to Enforce Judgment of Termination of Charges Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1361.” We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the notice of appeal was not timely filed. The district court entered its judgment on April 14, 2008. Knight’s notice of appeal was filed, at the earliest, on

January 27, 2009. ∗ Thus, Knight’s notice of appeal was filed well beyond the appeal period established by Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Because Knight failed to file a timely notice of appeal, we dismiss the appeal. Knight’s motion for default judgment is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

∗ For the purpose of this appeal, we assume that the date appearing on the notice of appeal is the earliest date it could have been properly delivered to prison officials for mailing to the court. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(c)(1); Houston v. Lack , 487 U.S. 266, 276 (1988).
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

: CIVIL ACTION NOS.

:

TAYLOR : 02-3877

JACKSON : 02-3879

LIAGA, et al. : 02-3920

KARGE, et al. : 02-3927

GREEN, et al. : 02-3942

MARKS : 02-3969

FULTZ : 02-3977

RACKLEY : 02-4118

THOMPSON, et al. : 02-4125

RUSSELL, et al. : 02-4127

ALCALA : 02-4131

ANDERSON : 02-4193

CAGAPE, et al. : 02-4227

MONZON, et al. : 02-4241

SANDOVAL, et al. : 02-4282

CHAPMAN, et al. : 02-4289

DUNHAM, et al. : 02-4304

FORTUNATO, et al. : 02-4315

:

VS. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION, et al. :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of July, 2002, the Court having been previously

advised that the above action cannot proceed to trial and disposition because of the following

reason:

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending disposition of a related

action.

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending determination of

arbitration proceedings.

[ ] - Interlocutory appeal filed.

[ X ] - Other: Case is placed into suspense pending receipt of the Case

Transfer Order from the Judicial Panel on Multi District Litigation

transferring case to District of Minnesota.

Case 2:02-cv-04131-JCJ Document 2 Filed 07/10/2002 Page 1 of 2
It is

ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this action closed for statistical purposes and

place the matter in the Civil Suspense File, and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction; and that the case be

restored to the trial docket when the action is in a status so that it may proceed to final

disposition; this order shall not prejudice the rights of the parties to this litigation.

BY THE COURT:

________________________________________

J. Curtis Joyner, Judge

Case 2:02-cv-04131-JCJ Document 2 Filed 07/10/2002 Page 2 of 2
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 210 (Wednesday, November 1, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 74990]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-24037]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY

Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

[Project No. 14861-002]


FFP Project 101, LLC; Notice of Modification of Procedural 
Schedule

    Take notice that the schedule for processing the following 
hydroelectric application has been modified.
    a. Type of Application: Original Major License.
    b. Project No.: 14861-002.
    c. Date Filed: June 23, 2020.
    d. Applicant: FFP Project 101, LLC.
    e. Name of Project: Goldendale Energy Storage Project.
    f. Location: Off-stream on the north side of the Columbia River at 
River Mile 215.6 in Klickitat County, Washington, with transmission 
facilities extending into Sherman County, Oregon. The project would be 
located approximately 8 miles southeast of the City of Goldendale, 
Washington. The project would occupy 18.1 acres of lands owned by the 
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and administered by the Bonneville Power 
Administration.
    g. Filed Pursuant to: Federal Power Act 16 U.S.C. 791(a)-825(r).
    h. Applicant Contact: Erik Steimle, Rye Development, 745 Atlantic 
Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts 02111; (503) 998-0230; email_
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection" class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2d485f44466d5f544849485b4841425d40484359034e4240">[email protected]</a>.
    i. FERC Contact: Michael Tust at (202) 502-6522; or email at 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#91fcf8f2f9f0f4fdbfe5e4e2e5d1f7f4e3f2bff6fee7"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="e38e8a808b82868fcd97969097a385869180cd848c95">[email protected]</span></a>.
    j. Procedural Schedule: The Commission's February 2, 2023, Notice 
of Modification of Procedural Schedule established October 2023 as the 
target date for issuing the Final Environmental Impact Statement (Final 
EIS). The revised estimate for issuing the Final EIS is December 2023.
    Any questions regarding this notice may be directed to Michael 
Tust.

    Dated: October 25, 2023.
Kimberly D. Bose,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 2023-24037 Filed 10-31-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6717-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
No. P68/120.

protests 65/17331 and 65/17332 (New York).

#### Durst Industries, Inc. *v.*United States,

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” covered by the foregoing protests consist of strainers in chief value of brass the same in all material respects as those the subject of Davies, *Turner & Company*v. *United States*(55 Cust. Ct. 488, Abstract 69651) and that the items marked “B” consist of strainers in chief value of steel similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 69651, supra, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### State Justice Institute

# AGENCY:

State Justice Institute.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

# SUMMARY:

The purpose of this meeting is to consider grant applications for the 1st quarter of FY 2024, and other business.

# DATES:

The SJI Board of Directors will be meeting on Monday, December 4, 2023 at 1 p.m. ET.

# ADDRESSES:

SJI Headquarters, 12700 Fair Lakes Circle, Suite 340, Fairfax, Virginia.

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

                        Jonathan Mattiello, Executive Director, State Justice Institute, 12700 Fair Lakes Circle, Suite 340, Fairfax, VA 22033, 703-660-4979,                         *contact@sji.gov.*

(Authority: 42 U.S.C. 10702(f).)

Jonathan D. Mattiello,

Executive Director.

[FR Doc. 2023-24695 Filed 11-7-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6820-SC-P
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 99.1

                        CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC REPORT

We, Ricardo Puente, Chief Executive Officer and Joan M. Fiorito, Chief Financial
Officer of TransWestern Holdings L. P. (the "Company"), certify, pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1)   the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period
      ended June 30, 2002 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C.
      78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)   the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.

Dated August 12, 2002

                                                  /s/ RICARDO PUENTE
                                                  ------------------------
                                                  Ricardo Puente
                                                  Chief Executive Officer

                                                  /s/ JOAN M. FIORITO
                                                  -------------------------
                                                  Joan M. Fiorito
                                                  Chief Financial Officer