alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 76 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  1st Session
H. RES. 76

Providing amounts for the expenses of the Permanent Select Committee on 
          Intelligence in the One Hundred Fifteenth Congress.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                            January 31, 2017

    Mr. Nunes (for himself and Mr. Schiff) submitted the following 
resolution; which was referred to the Committee on House Administration

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Providing amounts for the expenses of the Permanent Select Committee on 
          Intelligence in the One Hundred Fifteenth Congress.

    Resolved,

SECTION 1. AMOUNTS FOR COMMITTEE EXPENSES.

    For the expenses of the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence 
(hereafter in this resolution referred to as the ``Committee''), 
including the expenses of all staff salaries, there shall be paid, out 
of the applicable accounts of the House of Representatives for 
committee salaries and expenses, not more than $11,197,310 for the One 
Hundred Fifteenth Congress.

SEC. 2. SESSION LIMITATIONS.

    Of the amount specified in section 1--
            (1) not more than $5,598,655 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2017, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2018; and
            (2) not more than $5,598,655 shall be available for 
        expenses incurred during the period beginning at noon on 
        January 3, 2018, and ending immediately before noon on January 
        3, 2019.

SEC. 3. VOUCHERS.

    Payments under this resolution shall be made on vouchers authorized 
by the Committee, signed by the Chairman of the Committee, and approved 
in the manner directed by the Committee on House Administration.

SEC. 4. REGULATIONS.

    Amounts made available under this resolution shall be expended in 
accordance with regulations prescribed by the Committee on House 
Administration.
                                 <all>
```
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### U.S. International Development Finance Corporation

# AGENCY:

U.S. International Development Finance Corporation.

# ACTION:

Announcement of public hearing.

# SUMMARY:

The Board of Directors of the U.S. International Development Finance Corporation (“DFC”) will hold a public hearing on December 6, 2023. This hearing will afford an opportunity for any person to present views in accordance with section 1413(c) of the BUILD Act of 2018. Those wishing to present at the hearing must provide advance notice to the agency as detailed below.

# DATES:

Public hearing: 2:00 p.m. EST, Wednesday, December 6, 2023.

*Registration:*                         To attend, present at, or submit a written statement to the Board prior to the public hearing, individuals must notify DFC Acting Deputy Corporate Secretary Abigail Wade at                         *corporate.secretary@dfc.gov*                         at by 5:00 p.m. EST, Tuesday, November 28, 2023.                    

Notices of intent to attend or present at the public hearing must include the individual's name, title, organization, address, email address, phone number, and a concise summary of the subject matter to be presented. Oral presentations may not exceed five minutes and may be reduced proportionately, if necessary, to afford all participants an opportunity to be heard.

Written statements submitted to the Board prior to the public hearing must include the individual's name, title, organization, address, email address, and phone number. Statements must be typewritten, double-spaced, and less than ten pages in length.

Deborah Papadopoulos,

Records Management Specialist.

[FR Doc. 2023-24459 Filed 11-3-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE P
Subscribe to receive Bureau 

of Fiscal Service email 

updates here!!

 Reference and Guidance

GWA Reporting

CARS Tips and Reminders

Fact Sheets

 Treasury Support Center

1-877-440-9476

CRM CONTACTS

CRM MAILBOX:

gwa.crmd.users@fiscal.treasury.gov

IPAC- Dominique McCreary

Dominique.McCreary@fiscal.treasury.gov

(202)874-6352

TDO Payments- Luz Davila Lopez

Luz.Davila.Lopez@fiscal.treasury.gov 

(202)874-8599

NTDO Payments- Maria Davis

Maria.Davis@fiscal.treasury.gov

(202)874-8079

Collections- Katy Borys

Katy.Borys@fiscal.treasury.gov

(202)874-9005

Customer Relationship Management

TIP OF THE WEEK

GWA Systems External User

Guide

Version 1.0 

http://www.fiscal.treasury.gov/cars/reference-and-guidance.html

Have question regarding GWA modules and roles?? 

Download the GWA Systems External User Guide Today!!

• CARS External Modules and Roles

• GTAS External Roles

• GFRS External Roles

• IPAC External Modules and Roles

• SAM External Roles
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual report on Form 10-K of ATEL Capital Equipment Fund IX, LLC, (the Company) for the period ended December 31, 2006 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), and pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, I, Dean L. Cash, President and Chief Executive Officer
of ATEL Financial Services, LLC, Managing Member of the Company, hereby certify that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: May 8, 2007



|                 |  | 
|---------------- |  | 
|/s/ Dean L. Cash |  | 
|Dean L. Cash     |  | 

President and Chief Executive Officer of

ATEL Financial Services, LLC (Managing Member)
Replacement page for file “3.10 Fracturing Service Equipment 

Pamphlets (1 of 2).pdf”

This file is copyrighted. Please contact docket staff at 

Docket_ORD@epamail.epa.gov for access to this document.
Replacement page for file “3.10 Fracturing Service Equipment 

Pamphlets (2 of 2).pdf”

This file is copyrighted. Please contact docket staff at 

Docket_ORD@epamail.epa.gov for access to this document.
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 10.1

                        AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

      This Amendment to the Employment Agreement (as defined herein), effective
as of June 21, 2004, is made by and between JAMES L. BOX, an individual resident
of Georgia ("BOX") and EBANK (the "EMPLOYER").

      WHEREAS, the compensation committee of the Employer's holding company
approved an amendment to that certain Employment Agreement dated May 17, 2002,
by and between Box and the Employer (the "EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT");

      WHEREAS, this Amendment sets forth the terms and conditions of the
amendment as approved by the compensation committee of the Employer's holding
company;

      NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the premises, the mutual
covenants contained herein and other good and valuable consideration, the
receipt, legal sufficiency and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the
parties, each intending to be legally bound hereby, agree to amend the
Employment Agreement as follows:

      1.    The entire subparagraph (B) of Section 4(f) of the Employment
Agreement is amended by deleting such subparagraph (B) in its entirety and
inserting in lieu thereof the following:

      (B) If the Employee terminates his employment within 30 days of a Change
      in Control or if the Employer terminates the Employee Without Cause within
      30 days of a Change in Control, all of the provisions of subsection (A)
      above shall apply, except that the Employer shall pay the Employee in cash
      within 15 days of such termination date one lump sum payment in an amount
      equal to the Employee's then current annual base salary multiplied by four
      (without taking into account the amount of the Term which may have elapsed
      by such date).

      2.    Except to the extent this Amendment modifies the Employment
Agreement, all of the provisions of the Employment Agreement shall remain active
and in full effect.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused their respective signatures to
be affixed to this Amendment, effective as of the date first above written.

                                          ebank
                                          /s/ Gary M. Bremer
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Name: Gary M. Bremer
                                          Title: Chairman Compensation Committee

                                          Employee

                                          /s/ James L. Box
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          James L. Box
Before the Second Division,

January 16, 1951

No. 55122.

#### Crawford Watch Co. *v.*United States,

protests 111372-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It was stipulated that the items of merchandise marked “A” or “B” on the invoices consist of watch movements similar in all, material respects to those which were the subject of *United States*v. *Helbros-Watch Co. et al.*(38 C. C. P. A. 1, C. A. D. 430). Upon the agreed statement of facts and the cited authority, the items marked “A” were held properly dutiable-at the base rate of 90 cents each as watch movements more than 1 inch but less than 1.77 inches wide, and the items marked “B” were held dutiable at $1.20' each as watch movements more than Ko of 1 inch but not more than 1 inch wide-under paragraph 367 (a) (1), as modified, *supra.*
**UN PUBLISHED** 
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

**No. 10**  **- 6656** 

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , Plaintiff

– Appellee ,
v. JOHN EDWARD BELL, JR., a/k/a Goochie , Defendant

– Appellant
.

Appeal from the United States District Cour t for the District of Maryland , at Greenbelt
. Deborah K. Chasanow, Chief D istrict Judge. ( 8:02

- cr - 00049

- DKC

- 1 )

Submitted : February 22, 2011 Decided: March 1 6 , 2011

Before WILKINSON and KEENAN, Circuit Judges , and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge
.
Affirmed by un published per curiam opinion
.
John Edward Bell, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Suzanne Skalla, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenbelt, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.2 PER CURIAM: John Edward Bell, Jr., appeals the district court ’ s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion . We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United
St ates v. Bell , No. 8:02

- cr - 00049

- DKC

- 1 (D. Md. Mar. 29, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
IIA

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 71

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

OCTOBER 19, 1999

Received

JOINT RESOLUTION

Making further continuing appropriations for the fiscal year

2000, and for other purposes.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That section 106(c) of Public Law 106–62 is amended by

4 striking ‘‘October 21, 1999’’ and inserting in lieu thereof
2

HJ 71 RDS

1 ‘‘October 29, 1999’’. Notwithstanding section 106 of Pub2 lic Law 106–62, funds shall be available and obligations

3 for mandatory payments due on or about November 1,

4 1999, may continue to be made.

Passed the House of Representatives October 19,

1999.

Attest: JEFF TRANDAHL,

Clerk.
EXHIBIT 99.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Transitional Report of World Gaming plc (the "Company")
on Form 20-F for the period ending December 31, 2001 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Mark
Thompson, Vice President Finance and acting Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as adopted pursuanT to ss. 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

        (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

        (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ Mark Thompson
-----------------
Mark Thompson
Acting Chief Financial Officer
August 22, 2002
#### DONOVAN et al. v. McKENNA.

Civ. A. No. 7516.

United States District Court D. Massachusetts.

Oct. 18, *1948.*

Bernard Kaplan and Louis Theran, both of Boston, Mass., for plaintiffs.

William T. McCarthy, U. S. Atty. and William J. Koen, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Boston, Mass., for defendant.

SWEENEY, Chief Judge.

There is before me a motion to amend the complaint so as to add the United States as a party defendant. The plaintiffs brought a tort action in a Massáchusetts State Court against one McKenna, an Assistant Collector of Customs, for damages resulting from a collision between a car driven by McKenna and their property.' McKenna removed the case to this Court. The motion under consideration was then filed, the contention being made that, under the Federal Tort Claims Act, as amended, 28 U.S.C.A. § 1346(b) the United States is now liable equally with McKenna and that the two actions should be tried together. The United States opposes the motion to amend.

Following the authority and reasoning of Uarte v. United States, D.C., 7 F.R.D. 705, I find that the United States did not consent to such joinder when Congress passed the Act. As was stated in that case, 7 F.R.D. at page 706, “We start with the principle from which there has been no deviation in our entire judicial history, that the sovereign’s immunity to suit can only be waived by the sovereign himself in language which explicitly indicates such waiver. Statutes waiving immunity are construed not only strictly in favor of the Government, but narrowly and literally.” I find no language in the Act whereby the Government consented to be sued along with its employees. Furthermore, as stated at page 709 of 7 F.R.D. of the Uarte case, quoting United States v. Sherwood, 312 U.S. 584, 591, 61 S.Ct. 767, 85 L.Ed. 1058, “And to the argument that because the Rules of Civil Procedure governed the action, inferentially, joinder was allowed, the answer was this: ‘The matter is not one of procedure but of jurisdiction whose limits are marked by the Government’s consent to be sued. That consent may be conditioned, as we think it has been here, on the restriction of the issues to be adjudicated in the suit, to those between the claimant and the Government. The .jurisdiction thus limited is unaffected by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A. "following section 723c, which prescribe the methods by which *691the jurisdiction of the federal courts is to be exercised, but do not enlarge the jurisdiction.’ ”

Plaintiffs’ motion is denied.
### THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS

13

- 14

- 00568

- CR

Mark Anthony Green

v. The State of Texas

On Appeal from the 24th District Court of Victoria County , Texas Trial Cause No. 88

- 7

- 13,248

- 3

JUDGMENT THE THIRTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS, having considered this cause on appeal, concludes the appeal should be dismissed. The Court orders the appeal
DISMISSED FOR WANT OF JURISDICTION in accordance with its opinion

. We further order this decision certified below for observance. October 30, 2014
No. 53923.

#### Musicraft Records, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 63060-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

It was stipulated that the issue herein is the same in all material respects as that presented in *Mamary Bros., Inc.*v. *United States*(21 Cust. Ct. 135, C. D. 1142). In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries involved.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

MOHAMMED AL ADAHI, :

:

Petitioner, :

:

v. : Civil Action No. 05-280 (GK)

:

BARACK OBAMA, et al., :

:

Respondents. :

ORDER

On June 18, 2009, this Court issued an Order that Petitioner Al-Adahi’s testimony should

be presented in a courtroom open to the public and press. For the reasons which the Court fully

explained in an on-the-record telephone conference with counsel, the Court feels compelled to

rescind that Order. However, it is further

ORDERED, that if and when any Petitioner testifies, a transcript shall be prepared

immediately and shall be reviewed and redacted by the appropriate agency within a 24 hour period;

and it is further

ORDERED, that the Government, through the appropriate agency, videotape any such

testimony and maintain copies of the complete testimony as given, as well as a redacted version of

that testimony.

June 19, 2009 /s/ 

Gladys Kessler

United States District Judge

Copies via ECF to all counsel of record
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K Andover Holdings, Inc. (the Company) for the period ending December 31, 2008 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), the undersigned Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer of the Company hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that based on her knowledge:

(1)

the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and



(2)

the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



Date:  December 12, 2011

| |                                      
| | -------------------------------------
| |                                      
| |                                      
| | /s/ Barbara L. Tolley                
| | Barbara L. Tolley                    
| | Chief Executive Officer and Treasurer
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS

<S>                             <C>                     <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000             DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JUL-01-2000             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-2000             SEP-30-2000
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1                       1
<CASH>                                         505,000                 505,000
<SECURITIES>                               136,772,000             136,772,000
<RECEIVABLES>                               37,055,000              37,055,000
<ALLOWANCES>                                  (37,000)                (37,000)
<INVENTORY>                                          0                       0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                     0                       0
<PP&E>                                      82,740,000              82,740,000
<DEPRECIATION>                             (1,958,000)             (1,958,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             311,323,000             311,323,000
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                                0                       0
<BONDS>                                     98,693,000              98,693,000
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0                       0
<PREFERRED>                                    213,000                 213,000
<COMMON>                                       420,000                 420,000
<OTHER-SE>                                 200,138,000             200,138,000
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>               311,323,000             311,323,000
<SALES>                                              0                       0
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             5,896,000              14,824,000
<CGS>                                                0                       0
<TOTAL-COSTS>                              (5,978,000)            (18,673,000)
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                     0                       0
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0                       0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                           2,435,000               8,768,000
<INCOME-PRETAX>                              5,413,000               4,509,000
<INCOME-TAX>                               (2,263,000)             (1,976,000)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                          3,150,000               2,533,000
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0                       0
<CHANGES>                                            0                       0
<NET-INCOME>                                 3,150,000               2,533,000
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.08                    0.06
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.05                    0.04


</TABLE>
No. 67750.

#### Thomas Robinson Sales Company *v.*United States,

protest 62/18749-16705 (New Orleans).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *Falcon Sales Company*and *J. J. Murphy & Co.*v. *United States*(47 Cust. Ct. 129, C.D. 2292), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.