alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 14


                                     INFICON

                       Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

This Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (the "Code") is intended to articulate
and make publicly available a general statement regarding INFICON's (the
"Company" or "INFICON") expectations about the business conduct of the Company's
directors, officers and employees. This Code is not exclusive: Company personnel
shall also be subject to other applicable policies of the Company as those
policies may from time to time be implemented. This Code applies to the Company
and all of its subsidiaries and other business entities controlled by it
worldwide.

It is the policy of INFICON to conduct all Company business in accordance with
high standards of integrity and in compliance with all applicable laws and
regulations.

Accordingly, all directors, officers and employees of INFICON are required to:

      1.    Act with honesty and integrity, ethically handling actual and
            apparent conflicts of interests between their personal interests and
            the Company's interests.

      2.    The principal executive officer and senior financial officers, and
            others responsible for the preparation, evaluation and dissemination
            of INFICON's financial information, shall provide full, fair,
            accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in reports and
            documents INFICON files with, or submit to, the SWX Swiss Exchange
            and the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, and in
            public communications made by INFICON.

      3.    Comply with applicable laws, rules and regulations of federal,
            state, and provincial and local governments, and other appropriate
            private and public regulatory agencies. All directors, officers and
            employees of INFICON are expected to use good judgment and common
            sense in seeking to comply with the foregoing and to ask for
            appropriate advice in the event of uncertainty.

      4.    Seek guidance and promptly report any evidence of a violation of
            this Code to his or her supervisor or, if appropriate, to the Audit
            Committee of the INFICON Board of Directors, attention to Dr. Thomas
            Staehlin, Postfach 2879, St. Jakobs-Strasse 7, CH-4002 Basel,
            Switzerland. Calls, detailed notes and/or emails will be dealt with
            confidentially.

The Company will not allow any retaliation against anyone who acts in good faith
in reporting any such violation. Directors, officers and employees who violate
this Code will be subject to appropriate discipline, up to and including
dismissal from the Company and prosecution under the law. The Board of Directors
shall have the sole and absolute discretion and authority to approve any
deviation or waiver from this Code for executive officers and directors. Any
change in or waiver of this Code shall be promptly disclosed through a filing
with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.
No. 51898.

#### William Meyers et al. *v.*United States,

protests 121795-K/697, etc. (Chicago, etc.).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Virage Logic Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the
period ending June 30, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), Alexander Shubat, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, does hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to such officers knowledge:

(1) The Report
fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained
in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of and for the dates presented.



|                                     
|-------------------------------------
|/s/    Alexander Shubat              
|Dr. Alexander Shubat                 
|President and Chief Executive Officer
|August 10, 2009
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 72-6 Filed 08/28/2009 Page 1 of 14
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 72-6 Filed 08/28/2009 Page 2 of 14
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 72-6 Filed 08/28/2009 Page 3 of 14
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 72-6 Filed 08/28/2009 Page 4 of 14
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 72-6 Filed 08/28/2009 Page 5 of 14
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 72-6 Filed 08/28/2009 Page 6 of 14
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 72-6 Filed 08/28/2009 Page 7 of 14
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 72-6 Filed 08/28/2009 Page 8 of 14
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 72-6 Filed 08/28/2009 Page 9 of 14
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 72-6 Filed 08/28/2009 Page 10 of 14
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 72-6 Filed 08/28/2009 Page 11 of 14
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 72-6 Filed 08/28/2009 Page 12 of 14
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 72-6 Filed 08/28/2009 Page 13 of 14
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 72-6 Filed 08/28/2009 Page 14 of 14
**Exhibit 13.1**

**AnnualCertificationPursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of2002 (subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 ofTitle 18, United States Code), each of the undersigned officers of Crucell N.V.(the “Company”), does hereby certify, to such officer’s knowledge, that:

TheAnnual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2005of the Company fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) ofthe Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and information contained in the Form 20-Ffairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and resultsof operations of the Company.

| Date: June 29, 2006 | ** ** | ** **                |
|--------------------------|------------|---------------------------|
| ** **               | By:        | /s/ RONALD  H.P. BRUS     |   |
| ** **               | Name:      | Ronald H.P. Brus          |
| ** **               | Title:     | *Chief Executive Officer* |

 

| Date: June 29, 2006 | ** ** | ** **                |
|--------------------------|------------|---------------------------|
| ** **               | By:        | /s/ LEONARD  KRUIMER      |   |
| ** **               | Name:      | Leonard Kruimer           |
| ** **               | Title:     | *Chief Financial Officer* |

 

----
Document

Exhibit 10.8




2021 INCENTIVE PLAN FOR CERTAIN KEY EMPLOYEES


The Company has a discretionary annual incentive program under which exempt salaried employees may earn cash payments based on a percentage of base annual salary.  The actual percent is based on a variety of guidelines including performance levels of the respective business units primarily measured by operating income subject to certain adjustments.


The payment to an employee is based upon (i) their assigned grade level, (ii) actual company earnings achieved relative to a pre-determined target, which is adjusted upward if company performance exceeds target and reduced if company performance is less than target, and (iii) base salary paid during the fiscal year.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE: ASBESTOS PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

This document relates to:

 : CIVIL ACTION

02-2635 SHIRK : NO. MDL 875

02-2735 WATSON :

02-2736 HOOD :

02-2737 HART :

02-2738 JOHNSON :

02-2681 SHIRK :

02-2845 KINIUK :

02-3166 HRYCYK :

02-3168 GREEN :

02-3169 SAKEWICZ :

02-3170 HENDRICKS :

02-3171 PALMER :

02-3172 BERRY :

02-3175 SOLOMON :

02-3176 ROMANOWSKI :

02-3177 O’DONNELL :

02-3448 HARTMANN :

02-3449 ROCKS :

02-3450 REED :

02-3451 GAMBLER :

02-3452 MACAULEY :

02-3630 ALIBERT :

02-3631 VISCO :

02-3632 DANCSECS :

02-3847 HAMMOND :

02-3848 POTTER :

02-4095 SMITH :

02-4096 SEARFOSS :

02-4097 GEARINGER :

02-4101 FRYE :

02-4339 MEYER :

Case 2:02-cv-04101-HH Document 5 Filed 08/05/2002 Page 1 of 2
O R D E R

The Court having been advised that the issues raised in

each of these actions are also presently pending before the

Honorable District Court Judge Alfred Wolin. Judge Wolin has

been specially designated to sit in the District of Delaware and

preside over these matters. Further, the Judge has set a

schedule and will proceed appropriately. In the interest of

judicial economy and for a prompt resolution of all outstanding

issues this Court will hold its action in abeyance and await the

ruling by the Bankruptcy Court.

IT IS THEREFORE THE ORDER OF THIS COURT that all

pending motions for abstention and remand are denied without

prejudice at this time with leave to renew at a later date. The

cases are administratively dismissed, subject to reinstatement

following the determination of the bankruptcy issues by Judge

Wolin and any subsequent appeals thereto.

Done this 5th day of August, 2002.

 BY THE COURT

 

Charles R. Weiner, SJ

Case 2:02-cv-04101-HH Document 5 Filed 08/05/2002 Page 2 of 2
**STEAM ELECTRIC**

**DUMMY R** **E P**  **L AC**  **E M**  **E NT**  **P A**  **G E**  **EPA -**  **HQ -**  **OW -**  **20 09**  **- 0819**  **DCN: SE05590A2**
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 938 Introduced in House (IH)]

<DOC>

115th CONGRESS
  2d Session
H. RES. 938

Of inquiry directing the Attorney General to provide certain documents 
 in the Attorney General's possession to the House of Representatives 
relating to the ongoing congressional investigation related to certain 
  prosecutorial and investigatory decisions made by the Department of 
   Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation surrounding the 2016 
                               election.

_______________________________________________________________________

                    IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

                             June 13, 2018

    Mr. Meadows (for himself, Mr. Jordan, Mr. Gaetz, and Mr. Perry) 
submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee 
                            on the Judiciary

_______________________________________________________________________

                               RESOLUTION

 
Of inquiry directing the Attorney General to provide certain documents 
 in the Attorney General's possession to the House of Representatives 
relating to the ongoing congressional investigation related to certain 
  prosecutorial and investigatory decisions made by the Department of 
   Justice and Federal Bureau of Investigation surrounding the 2016 
                               election.

    Resolved, That the Attorney General is directed to transmit to the 
House of Representatives, not later than 14 days after the adoption of 
this resolution, copies of any document, record, memo, correspondence, 
or other communication, or any portion of any such communication, that 
refers or relates to the following:
            (1) All documents and communications with the Foreign 
        Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) referring or relating to 
        any Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) applications 
        associated with Carter Page or individuals on President Trump's 
        2016 presidential campaign or part of the Trump administration.
            (2) All documents and communications referring or relating 
        to FISC hearings and deliberations, including any court 
        transcripts, related to any FISA applications associated with 
        Carter Page or the Trump campaign or Trump administration.
            (3) All documents and communications referring or relating 
        to internal Department of Justice or Federal Bureau of 
        Investigation management requests to review, scrub, report on, 
        or analyze any reporting of FISA collection involving, or 
        coverage mentioning, the Trump campaign or Trump 
        administration.
            (4) All documents and communications referring or relating 
        to defensive briefings provided by the Department of Justice or 
        Federal Bureau of Investigation to the 2016 presidential 
        campaigns of Hillary Clinton or President Trump.
                                 <all>
```
<PAGE>

Exhibit 32.2

                               SHOPKO STORES, INC.

                   CERTIFICATION OF PERIODIC FINANCIAL REPORT
                       PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of ShopKo Stores,
Inc. (the "Company") certifies that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended August 2, 2003 (the "Report")
fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d), as applicable,
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the information contained in the
Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and
results of operations of the Company.

Dated: September 16, 2003

                                                 SHOPKO STORES, INC.

                                                 /s/ Brian W. Bender
                                                 --------------------
                                                 Brian W. Bender
                                                 Senior Vice President,
                                                 Chief Financial Officer

         This certification accompanies this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 and shall not be
deemed filed by the Company for purposes of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
---

|Exhibit 32.1                                 
|---------------------------------------------
|                                             
|CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO                    
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350                       
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                       
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Alternet Systems, Inc.
(the "Company") on Form 10-KSB/A for the year ended December 31, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below,
hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to their knowledge:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                  
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation
      of the Company.

|Dated: August 7, 2008 | By: | /s/
      Henryk Dabrowski
|--------------------- | --- | --------------------------
|                      |     | Henryk Dabrowski          
|                      |     | President and Director    

---
Turn on more accessible mode                

                    Turn off more accessible mode                

 Reports and PlansIt looks like your browser does not have JavaScript enabled. Please turn on JavaScript and try again. It looks like your browser does not have JavaScript enabled. Please turn on JavaScript and try again.
No. 65394.

#### Joannau Cycle Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 59/19060, etc. (Tampa).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Schmidt Pritchard & Co. et al.*(47 C.C.P.A. 152, C.A.D. 750), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
CAS Transaction Thresholds 

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) 

1. What is the dollar limit for card transactions for the Card Acquiring Service 

(CAS) program?

a. There are different limits contingent upon the card type. 

i. For credit card, the maximum a Federal Agency may collect in 

a single transaction is $24,999.99. 

ii. For debit card, there is no limit.

iii. For government cards, the maximum a Federal Agency may 

collect in a single transaction is $9,999.99.

1. Note: Agency-to-Agency transactions are called intragovernmental transactions. Federal agencies are 

responsible for all interchange and transaction fees 

associated with these types of payments. 

2. What is a split transaction?

a. The CAS program defines a split transaction as, a transaction obligation 

paid to which a customer uses one or more cards over the course of one or 

multiple days that result in an exceeded transaction maximum of over 

$24,999.

3. If I have a transaction obligation for $42,000, can I use two credit cards to 

satisfy payment?

a. No, an agency customer cannot use two (2) credit cards to exceed 

the $24,999.99 credit card limit to pay on a transaction obligation. 

This would be considered a split transaction which violates the CAS 

Card Rules outlined in the Treasury Financial Manual: Volume 1, 

Chapter 7000 (Part 5) – Credit and Debit Card Transaction 

Collections. 

i. A customer could use one (1) credit card for the $24,999.99 

and pay the remaining balance with an alternative payment 

option, Automated Clearing House (ACH), Debit Card or Cash.

ii. A customer could use any alternative payment outside of 

credit card to satisfy the payment of the entire transaction 

obligation. 

4. What is an intra-governmental transaction?

a. An intra-governmental card transaction (IGT) is defined as a sale of 

goods or services, or collection of other obligation by one 

government agency from another government agency using a 

government-issued Card.

5. Is there an alternate form of payment for an IGT?

a. Yes, agencies can process an Intra-governmental Payment and 

Collection also known as an IPAC. IPAC is a way for Federal Program 

Agencies to transfer funds from one agent to another with 

standardized descriptive data.
# C_2015171EN.01003401.xml

| 26.5.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 171/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

26.5.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 171/34

---

Action brought on 25 March 2015 — L'Oréal v OHIM — Theralab (VICHY LABORATOIRES V IDÉALIA)

(Case T-144/15)

(2015/C 171/40)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: L'Oréal (Paris, France) (represented by: J. Sena Mioludo, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Theralab — Produtos Farmacêuticos e Nutracêuticos, Lda (Viseu, Portugal)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Applicant: Applicant

Applicant:

Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word elements ‘VICHY LABORATOIRES V IDÉALIA’ — Application for registration No 11 074 391

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before OHIM:

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 22 January 2015 in Case R 1097/2014-4

Contested decision:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | annul the decision of the Opposition Division of 26 February 2014 in Opposition B 002139916; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the decision of the Opposition Division of 26 February 2014 in Opposition B 002139916;

| — | reject the opposition B 002139916; |
| --- | --- |

—

reject the opposition B 002139916;

| — | accept the community Trademark Application No 011074391 ‘VICHY LABORATOIRES V IDÉALIA (+fig.)’ in its entirety; |
| --- | --- |

—

accept the community Trademark Application No 011074391 ‘VICHY LABORATOIRES V IDÉALIA (+fig.)’ in its entirety;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Plea(s) in law

Plea(s) in law

| — | Infringement of article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

CLARA RUFFALO and

TONY RUFFALO

:

:

: CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-CV-4112

Plaintiffs, :

:

v. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION;

BAYER AG;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE;

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM

:

:

:

:

:

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

:

Defendants. :

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of the Court:

Kindly enter the appearances of Hope S. Freiwald, Aline Fairweather, Erin

Brennan and Kirstin J. Miller as attorneys for defendant GlaxoSmithKline PLC.

Respectfully Submitted,

_____________________________ _____________________________

Hope S. Freiwald Aline Fairweather

_____________________________ _____________________________

Erin Brennan Kirstin J. Miller

DECHERT PRICE & RHOADS

4000 Bell Atlantic Tower

1717 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2793

(215) 994-4000

Case 2:02-cv-04112-JD Document 6 Filed 09/11/2002 Page 1 of 1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

IN RE: ASBESTOS PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

This document relates to:

 : CIVIL ACTION

02-2635 SHIRK : NO. MDL 875

02-2735 WATSON :

02-2736 HOOD :

02-2737 HART :

02-2738 JOHNSON :

02-2681 SHIRK :

02-2845 KINIUK :

02-3166 HRYCYK :

02-3168 GREEN :

02-3169 SAKEWICZ :

02-3170 HENDRICKS :

02-3171 PALMER :

02-3172 BERRY :

02-3175 SOLOMON :

02-3176 ROMANOWSKI :

02-3177 O’DONNELL :

02-3448 HARTMANN :

02-3449 ROCKS :

02-3450 REED :

02-3451 GAMBLER :

02-3452 MACAULEY :

02-3630 ALIBERT :

02-3631 VISCO :

02-3632 DANCSECS :

02-3847 HAMMOND :

02-3848 POTTER :

02-4095 SMITH :

02-4096 SEARFOSS :

02-4097 GEARINGER :

02-4101 FRYE :

02-4339 MEYER :

Case 2:02-cv-02737 Document 3 Filed 08/05/2002 Page 1 of 2
O R D E R

The Court having been advised that the issues raised in

each of these actions are also presently pending before the

Honorable District Court Judge Alfred Wolin. Judge Wolin has

been specially designated to sit in the District of Delaware and

preside over these matters. Further, the Judge has set a

schedule and will proceed appropriately. In the interest of

judicial economy and for a prompt resolution of all outstanding

issues this Court will hold its action in abeyance and await the

ruling by the Bankruptcy Court.

IT IS THEREFORE THE ORDER OF THIS COURT that all

pending motions for abstention and remand are denied without

prejudice at this time with leave to renew at a later date. The

cases are administratively dismissed, subject to reinstatement

following the determination of the bankruptcy issues by Judge

Wolin and any subsequent appeals thereto.

Done this 5th day of August, 2002.

 BY THE COURT

 

Charles R. Weiner, SJ

Case 2:02-cv-02737 Document 3 Filed 08/05/2002 Page 2 of 2