P u rsuan t t o 5 T H C IR . R. 47. 5, t h e courtha s det erm i n ed that t h i s opi n i on * shou l d n otbe pu bl i shedan d i s not preceden texcept u n der t h e l i m i t ed c i r c um s t anc e s s e tf

o r t h i n 5 T H C IR . R. 47. 5. 4. 

### INTHE UNITED S TATESCOU RT OFAPPEALS

FORTHEFIFTH CIRCU IT

N o. 09- 50092 Su m m ar yC al endar UN I TE D S TA TE S OF AM ERI CA P l ai n t i f f

- A pp el l ee v. C A R LO S A LB E R TO H E N R I Q U E Z- V I LL A FU E R TE , a l soknow n as O sc ar P ol an co- S al as, al so kn ow n as V i ct or M an u elO rt i z D e fe nda nt - Appe l l ant A pp ealf

rom t h e U n i t ed S t ates D i st ri ctC ou rt f or th e W est ernD i st ri ctof T exas U SDC N o . 3 : 0 8
- CR- 2 7 6 2
- ALL B ef ore B E N AV ID E S , P R A D O , an d S O U T H W IC K , C i rcui tJu dg es. P E R C U R IA M: * C arl os A lbert o H en riq u ez- V i l l af u ert e ( H en ri qu ez) w as convi ct ed of ree n teringthe U n itedS ta te s ille g a llyfo llo w in gd e p o r ta tio n a n dh a s a p p e a le dh is s e nt e nc e . H e nr i que z c o nt e nds t hatt he no n- gui de l i ne s s e nt e nc e i m po s e d byt he di st ri ctcourtw as u n reasona bl e. B ecau se H en ri qu ez di d not obj ect i n t h e di st ri ct c o u r t t o t h e re a s o n a b le n e s s o f th e s e n te n c e , o u rre v ie w is fo rp la in e r r o r . S ee Un i t ed S t ate s v. B ran t ley , 5 37 F. 3d3 47 , 3 49 ( 5th Ci r . 2 00 8) . I n r e vi e w i ng t he United States Court of App eals

Fifth Circuit 

### F I L E D November

30, 2009 Cha rl es R. F ulb ru g e II I ClerkN o. 09- 50092

2 r e as o nab l e ne s s o f

t he s e nt e nc e w e co ns i de rt he t o t ali t y o f the c i r c um s t anc e s a nd th e e x te n t o f th e d is tr ic t co u r t’s v a r ia n c e fr o m th e g u id e lin e s r a n g e . Id . W e give “con sider a b l e defere n ce” to th e dist ri ct cou rt’ s d eterm i n a ti on of th e a p p rop ri a te s e n te n c e b a s e do n t h e 1 8 U .S .C . § 3 5 5 3 (a) fa c to r s . S e eUn i t e dS t a t e sv . Wi l l i a ms , 517 F. 3d 801, 812 ( 5t h C i r . 2008) . H e nr i que z a r gue s t hatitw as im pro pe rf o rt he di s t r i c tc o ur tt o m ak e assum pti on s abou t t h e reasons f or th e i m posi t i on of

t h e sentence rel ated t o a p ri or ill eg a l -reen try con victi on . H en r iq u e z sp ecu l a tes th a t th e 7 0 -m on th sentence i n t h at case m ay hav e been “i m properl y cal cul ated” an d th at th e rec ord di d n otest abli sh that t h e m ore l en i en tgu i del i n es s en t en ce i n th e i n st an tcase resul t ed f

rom a chan g e i n t h e l aw , as t h e di st ri ctcourtsup posed . H en ri qu ez argu es th at th e gu i del i n es s en t en ce acc ou n t ed ad equ ately f or th e st atutor y sentenci n g fact ors. T h e di st ri ctcourt ’ s express reasons f or im p o sing the 60-m on t h t erm of i m pr i s o nm e nti n t hi s c as e r e f l e c tt hatitc o ns i dered the s e r i o us ne s s o f t he of fen se, H en riq u e z ’ s lack of res pect f

or th e l aw , an d the n eed to provi de j u st pu n i shm en tf

or th e of

fen se and t o deteran d p rot ectt h e pu bl i c f rom f u t u re c r im in a l c o n d u c t. S ee § 355 3( a) . H en ri qu ez ha s not show n t h at th e di st ri ctcourt c o m m itt e dp la in e r r o rinim p o s in gth e s e n te n c e . S ee B ran t ley , 537 F. 3d at350. H e n riq u e z co n te n d s a lso th a t, inli g h t of A pp rend iv. New Jersey , 5 30 U . S. 4 6 6 (2 0 0 0 ), th e s e n te n c in ge n h a n c e m e n t o f 8 U .S .C . § 1 3 2 6 (b ) is uncons t i t ut i onal . H enr i quez ac know l edge s t hatt hi s i ssu e i s f or ec l os ed by A lem end arez- T

orre s v. Un i t ed S t ate s , 5 23 U . S. 2 24 , 2 35 ( 19 98 ) ; he ha s r ai s e d the is s u e to p r e s e r v e i tfo rfu r th e rre v ie w . S ee Un i t ed S t ate s v. F am bro , 526 F. 3d 8 3 6 , 8 5 1 & n .9 6 (5 th C ir .), cer t . den i ed , 1 2 9 S . C t. 6 2 5 (2 0 0 8 ); Un it edS tate s v. Pi ne da-Arre l lano , 492 F . 3d624 , 626 ( 5th C i r. 200 7) . Th e j u dg m en ti s AF F I RMED.