alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

eRegistration User Guide

_________________________________________________________________________________________

1 of 2 March 12, 2014

Full eRegistration allows a user to access the FERC Online Suite of applications. A 

validated account allows for:

• Submission of electronic filings to FERC

• Appearance as a Signer or Other Contact on eFiled documents

• Appearance as an Intervenor on a Service List

• Access to the Service List within FERC Online

• Ability to eSubscribe to dockets and/or News Releases

Users who are interested in only submitting a comment may wish to forgo eRegistration 

and submit their comments through eComment.

There are two types of eRegistration that FERC offers:

1. Partial Registration:

• Required: Name, eMail 

• Access to: eSubscription

2. Full Registration:

• Required: Name, Email, Address, Alternate Contact Information

• Access to: Company Registration, eFiling, eSubscription, Service List

Here’s how to eRegister, starting from eRegistration :

1. Click on eRegister from the eRegistration page.

2. Enter the Required (*) information

• Your password must be 8-12 characters long with at least one numeric or 

special character

3. Decide which Registration is best for you

• Click “Done” to complete a Partial Registration. Go to Step 6.

• Click “Next” to complete a Full Registration. Go to Step 4.

4. Enter Address information. Click “Next”

5. Enter Organization / Alternate Contact information. Click “Done.”

• Organization is part of your standard business mailing address

• Individuals can search and select “Individual” for their organization

6. A validation email will be sent to the email address you provided in Step 2.

• You must click the link within the email in order to complete the 

registration process

Users who are Partially Registered have the option to upgrade their account to Full 

Registration:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

eRegistration User Guide

_________________________________________________________________________________________

2 of 2 March 12, 2014

1. Login to FERC Online

2. Click “Edit Registration”

3. Verify Name, Email. Click “Next”

4. Enter Address information. Click “Next”

5. Enter Organization / Alternate Contact information. Click “Done.”

Contact FERCOnlineSupport@ferc.gov or toll-free at 1-866-208-3676 if you have 

problems setting up an account or if you have forgotten your password.
Exhibit 31.1—Section 302 CertificationI, Ellen Z. Lamale, certify that:I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K, and all reports on Form 8-K containingdistribution or servicing reports filed in respect of period included in the year covered by thisannual report, of Principal Life Income Fundings Trust 2005-81;1. Based on my knowledge, the information in these reports, taken as a whole, does not containany untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make thestatements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, notmisleading as of the last day of the period covered by this annual report;2. Based on my knowledge, the distribution or servicing information required to be provided tothe depositor by the trustee under the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, forinclusion in these reports is included in these reports;3. I am responsible for reviewing the activities performed by the depositor and the trusteeunder the pooling and servicing, or similar agreement, and based upon my knowledge and theannual compliance review required under that agreement, and except as disclosed in thereports, the depositor and trustee have each fulfilled its obligations under that agreement;and4. The reports disclose all significant deficiencies relating to the compliance by the trusteeand the depositor with the minimum servicing or similar standards based upon the reportprovided by an independent public accountant, after conducting a review in compliance with theUniform Single Attestation Program for Mortgage Bankers or similar procedures, as set forth inthe pooling and servicing, or similar agreements, that is included in these reports.In giving the certifications above, I have reasonably relied on information provided to me by thefollowing unaffiliated parties: Ernst and Young and Citibank, N.A.Date: March 24, 2006By:     /s/ Ellen Z. Lamale
Case No. 8,339.

#### LIEB v. INTERNATIONAL INS. CO.

[The ease reported under above title in 3 Am. Law T. Rep. U. S. Ots. 143, is the same as Case No. 5,29SJ _
Before the Third Division,

December 1, 1959

No. 63546.

protest 127405-K (Seattle).

#### Washington State Liquor Control Board *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *R. C. Williams & Co., Inc.*(40 C.C.P.A. 130, C.A.D. 508), and *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C.D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
EXHIBIT 32.2


                           SECTION 1350 CERTIFICATION


     In connection with the Annual Report of Belltower  Entertainment Corp. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-K for the year  ending  April 30,  2009 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),  I, Donald
K. Bell, President of the Company,  certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the  Sarbanes-Oxley  Act of 2002, that, to
my knowledge:

     (1)  The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     (2)  The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.


Date: August 12, 2009



                                        By: /s/ DONALD K. BELL
                                            ____________________________________
                                                Donald K. Bell
                                                Director and President
                                                (Principal Executive) and
                                                Financial and Accounting Officer
### -82 -80 -78 -76 -74

36 38 40 

## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 08/17 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 17 Aug 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 38.81 N 76.74 WMeters AGL 

## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■



## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★ ● ● ● ●



## ★ ● ● ● ●
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of GSI Technology, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10K for the year ending March 31, 2008 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Lee-Lean Shu, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)   The
Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

(2)   The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

June 17,
2008

| |  | /s/LEE-LEAN SHULee-Lean Shu President and Chief Executive
Officer
| |  | -----------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in
typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---



QuickLinks
Exhibit 99.1

**CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER** **AND PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER**
**PURSUANT TO** **18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,** **AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF** **THE
SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a) and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title
18, United States Code) (the "Act"), each of the undersigned officers of Powder River Basin Gas Corp., a Colorado
corporation (the "Company"), does hereby certify that:

The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2002 (the "Periodic Report") of the Company fully
complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 780(d))
and information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results
of operations of the Company.

/s/ Gregory C. Smith

-----------------------------------

Gregory C. Smith

President

Powder River Basin Gas Corp.

Dated:  April 15, 2003

The foregoing certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section 906 of the Act and is not being filed as part of the
Periodic Report or as a separate disclosure document.
No. 51572.

#### Protests 504682-G, etc., of Saks & Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). In accordance therewith the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
March 3, 1954

No. 57899.

Suit 4734.

#### International Expediters, Inc. *v.*United States

C. D. 1390 affirmed November 2, 1953. C. A. D. 543.
Before the First Division

February 11, 1948

No. 52167.

protest 129272-K (Providence).

#### Tupman Thurlow Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cole, J.

When the case was, called for hearing it was submitted on an oral stipulation, the parties agreeing that 242 bales of wool consist in fact of “greasy Argentine wool, 44’s grade, and that said wool at the time of importation, had a clean content yield of 65 per cent,” as claimed by plaintiff. The protest was sustained to the extent indicated.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Elizabeth A. Weaver

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

October 2, 2009 

d0929 

Order 

 

October 2, 2009 

139304(85) 

In re LAURENCE GEE ROBBINS, JR. 

and BRAIN JAMAL ROBBINS, Minors. 

_________________________________________/ 

DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN SERVICES, 

Petitioner-Appellee, 

v SC: 139304 

 COA: 284790 

Wayne Circuit Family 

DEONNA I. SANDERS, Division: 04-437255-NA 

Respondent-Appellant, 

and 

LAURENCE ROBBINS, 

Respondent. 

_________________________________________/ 

 On order of the Court, the motion for reconsideration of this Court’s August 20, 

2009 order is considered, and it is DENIED, because it does not appear that the order was 

entered erroneously.
EXHIBIT
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002





In
      connection with the Annual Report of Fuego Entertainment, Inc. (the "Company")
      on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2006 as filed with the
      Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Hugo
      M.
      Cancio, in my capacity as Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify,
      pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
      Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.




**Fuego
                  Entertainment, Inc.**Date:
                  December 6, 2006
              By:
              /s/
                  Hugo M. CancioHugo
                  M. Cancio
                Principal
                  Accounting Officer
#### Engelhard *v.*Nordman, Appellant.

*Practice, O. P.*— Judgments *non obstante veredicto*— Act *of April 22, 1905, P. L. 286*— Point *for binding instructions*— Appeals— *Quashing appeals.*

An appeal from refusal of defendant’s motion for judgment non obstante veredicto will be dismissed, where the record shows that the motion was not based upon a written point, presented at the time of trial, requesting binding instructions.

Argued April 28, 1924.

Appeal, No. 31, April T., 1924, by defendant, from judgment of C. P. Allegheny Co., Oct. T., 1920, No. 2359, on verdict for plaintiff in the case of E. F. Engelhard v. J. J. Nordman.

Before Henderson, Trexler, Keller, Linn and Gawthrop, JJ.

Appeal dismissed.

Assumpsit on contract of purchase and sale. Before Carpenter, J.

Verdict for plaintiff in the sum of $594.50, and judgment thereon. Defendant appealed.

*Error assigned*was refusal of defendant’s motion for judgment non obstante veredicto.

*Arthur O. Fording,*for appellant.

*John E. Winner,*and with him *Frank I. Gollmar,*for appellee.

May 5, 1924:

Per Curiam,

As the motion for judgment n. o. v. was not supported by a written point for binding instructions as required by the statute, it was properly refused. The appeal is dismissed: Standard Brewing Co. v. Knapp, 79 Pa. Superior Ct. 252.
**Exhibit 99.2**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Foundation CapitalResources, Inc. (“Foundation Capital”) for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, the Chief Financial Officer of FoundationCapital, certifies that: 

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof Foundation Capital.
No. 68643.

protest 150031-K (Laredo).

#### Weigert-Dagen Shoe Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of footwear similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. *A. J. Taylor of Santa Fe, New Mexico*(48 CCPA 97, C.A.D. 772), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
**EXHIBIT
99.4**
 
 **COMMENTS
BY AUDITORS ON CANADA - UNITED STATES OF AMERICA**
 **REPORTING
DIFFERENCES**
 
 In
the United States of America, reporting standards for auditors require the
addition of an explanatory paragraph (following the opinion paragraph) when
there are changes in accounting principles that have a material effect on the
comparability of the financial statements and changes in accounting principles
that have been implemented in the financial statements, such as the changes
described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements of Enerplus
Resources Fund.
 
 In
the United States of America, reporting standards for auditors also require the
addition of an explanatory paragraph (following the opinion paragraph) when
there have been restatements of the financial statements as described in Note 14
to the consolidated financial statements.
 
 Our
report to the unitholders dated February 24, 2005 is expressed in accordance
with Canadian reporting standards, which do not require a reference in the
auditors’ report to such changes in accounting principles as described in Note 2
or to such conditions and events as described in Note 14 when the changes,
conditions and events are properly accounted for and adequately disclosed in the
financial statements.
  /s/
      Deloitte & Touche LLPIndependent
      Registered Chartered AccountantsCalgary,
      Alberta, Canada
 
 February
24, 2005
No. 64737.

#### Bunge Corporation *v.*United States,

protest 59/10725 (New York).

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of scarves in chief value of silk and that its use is the same in all material respects as that the subject of Abstract 60626, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
## In The Court of Appeals Sixth Appellate District of Texas at Texarkana

No. 06

- 14

- 00076

- CR

JULIO TORRES PALOMO, Appellant

V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the 196th District Court

Hunt County, Texas Trial Court No. 28777

Before Morriss, C.J., Moseley and Burgess, JJ.2 

### O R D E R Court reporter Becky Wheeler recorded the trial proceedings in appellate cause number 06

- 14

- 0007 6

- CR, styled Julio Torres Palomo v. The State of Texas , trial court cause number 28777, on appeal from the 196th Judicial District Court of Hunt County, Texas. On January 27, 2015, this Court issued an order to the clerk of this Court or her appointee, in accordance with Rule 9.10(f) of the Texas Rules of Ap pellate Procedure, to seal the electronically filed reporter’s record in this case. By letter of even date, this Court notified Wheeler of the sealing order, provided her a copy of said order, and advised her that, although Rule 9.10 forbids the filing of documents containing sensitive data, we were not requesting redaction of the record at that time. See T EX
. R.
A PP
. P. 9.10(f). We further advised Wheeler that , should the need arise in the future, we would, at that time, ask her to redact the reporter’ s record. By letter dated November 13, 2015, this Court notified Wheeler that Palomo had requested a copy of the reporter’s record in this matter. We further advised Wheeler that , as Palomo is unquestionably entitled to a copy of the record, Wheeler woul d need to submit a redacted version of the record to this Court so that we, in turn, could fulfill Palomo’s request. Included as enclosures in the November 13 letter for Wheeler’s use in preparing the redacted record in this matter were (1) our letter of January 27, 2015, advising Wheeler of our order sealing the record in this case; (2) our January 27, 2015, sealing order; and (3) a copy of the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals’ recent order adopting amendments to Rule 9.10. We requested that Wheeler file the redacted record with this Court on or before December 4, 2015. Wheeler failed to respond to our letter and failed to provide the redacted record. Follow

- up attempts to contact Wheeler by email were3

unsuccessful, until telephone contact was made with her on December 9, 2015. At that time, Wheeler indicated that she would be able to file the redacted record with this Court within twenty

one days. Because Palomo’s request for a copy of the record and his payment for same were received over thirty days ago, the redacted record should be received by this Court, at the very latest, within fifteen days of the date of this ord er. Accordingly, we order Wheeler to provide the redacted record to this Court no later than the close of business on Wednesday, D ecember 3 0 , 2015. If the redacted reporter’s record is not received by December 3 0 , we warn Wheeler that we may begin contempt proceedings and order her to demonstrate why s he should not be held in contempt of this Cour t for failing to obey its order

. IT IS SO ORDERED.
BY THE COURT
Date: December 15 , 2015
(b) (6)




(b) (6)
(b) (6)
(b) (6)
(b) (6)
(b) (6)
(b) (6)
(b) (6)
<PAGE>

                                                                    EXHIBIT 32.2

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of Blue Ridge Energy, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended March 31, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Norman
G. Haisler, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that to the best of my knowledge:

    (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
        15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

    (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
        respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
        Company.

/s/ Norman G. Haisler
Norman G. Haisler
Sr. Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
May 13, 2004
IV 

House Calendar No. 122 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 714 

[Report No. 115–537] 

Providing for consideration of the Senate amendments to the bill (H.R. 

695) to amend the National Child Protection Act of 1993 to establish 

a national criminal history background check system and criminal history 

review program for certain individuals who, related to their employment, 

have access to children, the elderly, or individuals with disabilities, and 

for other purposes. 

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 

JANUARY 29, 2018 

Ms. CHENEY, from the Committee on Rules, reported the following resolution; 

which was referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be printed 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the Senate amendments to 

the bill (H.R. 695) to amend the National Child Protection Act of 1993 to establish a national criminal history 

background check system and criminal history review 

program for certain individuals who, related to their 

employment, have access to children, the elderly, or individuals with disabilities, and for other purposes. 

1 Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it 

2 shall be in order to take from the Speaker’s table the bill 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
2 

•HRES 714 RH 

1 (H.R. 695) to amend the National Child Protection Act 

2 of 1993 to establish a national criminal history back3 ground check system and criminal history review program 

4 for certain individuals who, related to their employment, 

5 have access to children, the elderly, or individuals with dis6 abilities, and for other purposes, with the Senate amend7 ments thereto, and to consider in the House, without 

8 intervention of any point of order, a single motion offered 

9 by the chair of the Committee on Appropriations or his 

10 designee that the House: (1) concur in the Senate amend11 ment to the title; and (2) concur in the Senate amendment 

12 to the text with an amendment consisting of the text of 

13 Rules Committee Print 115-56. The Senate amendments 

14 and the motion shall be considered as read. The motion 

15 shall be debatable for one hour equally divided and con16 trolled by the chair and ranking minority member of the 

17 Committee on Appropriations. The previous question shall 

18 be considered as ordered on the motion to adoption with19 out intervening motion or demand for division of the ques20 tion. 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS

daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS
House Calendar No. 122 

115TH CONGRESS 

2D SESSION H. RES. 714 

[Report No. 115–537] 

RESOLUTION 

Providing for consideration of the Senate amendposes. dividuals with disabilities, and for other pur- ment, have access to children, the elderly, or in- tain individuals who, related to their employ- tem and criminal history review program for cer- a national criminal history background check sys- tional Child Protection Act of 1993 to establish ments to the bill (H.R. 695) to amend the NaJANUARY 29, 2018 

Referred to the House Calendar and ordered to be 

printed 


daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with BILLS