alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Brandon Truaxe, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

|(1) | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Euoko Group, Inc. for
      the year ended July 31, 2009 (the "Report") fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934; and
|--- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
|(2) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of Euoko Group, Inc.                                                           

Dated: November 6, 2009



| | /s/
      Brandon Truaxe                                       
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------
| | Brandon Truaxe                                                 
| | President, Chief Executive Officer and director                
| | (Principal Executive Officer, Principal
      Financial Officer
| | and Principal Accounting Officer)                              
| | Euoko Group, Inc.                                              



A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the
signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this
written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Euoko Group,
Inc. and will be retained by Euoko Group, Inc. and furnished to the Securities
and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
避免止贖

識察早期警告訊號以及尋找其他方法代替止贖

來自:
避免止贖

不到萬不得已,沒有哪位房主會考慮放棄一家人的住宅。不過,如果瞭解

止贖程序及通常引致其發生的原因,您可以更為主動地應對潛在的問題,

以免它們影響您按時支付抵押貸款付款的能力。另外,如果您覺得自己支

付抵押貸款付款有困難,您還可以尋求幫助。

及時察覺財務問題的訊號

有時,生活中的意外變故可能導致房主難以履行責任。

如果您失業、離婚或生病,您或許會有一段時間難以支

付抵押貸款付款。您的抵押貸款付款可能會顯著增加。

如果您預計將來支付抵押貸款付款會有困難,您必須立

刻採取行動,尋找解決方案。

立刻獲得合適的幫助!

止贖是一種法律程序,當貸款違約時,貸款機構可依據

該程序收回被抵押物業(房屋)的產權,並賣出物業。

如果您覺得自己可能無法按時付款,應當盡快打電話聯

絡您的貸款機構(您向他們支付抵押貸款付款的公司)

,並要求與負責違約管理或止損的人員通話。他們是您

求助的最佳人選,可幫助您根據自己的個人情況尋找合

適的解決方案。在與貸款機構討論的時候,應將您的情

況如實相告。您應當說明您遇到的財務問題是暫時性質

還是長期性質。

非營利的住房和信用諮詢機構也是很好的幫手。他們可

與您一起制訂預算,探索對您有幫助的選項。如果想與

專門幫助房主避免止贖的顧問討論問題,請隨時致電房

主HOPETM熱線888-995-HOPE,白天或晚上任何時間

都有人接聽。如果想查找您附近的住宅與城市發展部(

英文簡稱為HUD)認定的諮詢機構,請瀏覽

http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src=/i_want_

to/talk_to_a_housing_counselor.

瞭解您有哪些選項

住宅可負擔計劃

聯邦「住宅可負擔計劃」(Making Home Affordable 

Program) 旨在使房主目前和將來的抵押貸款付款變得

更容易負擔。該計劃包括三個選項:住宅可負擔再融資

計劃(英文簡稱為HARP)、住宅可負擔修正計劃(英

文簡稱為HAMP)以及住宅可負擔止贖替代方案(英文

簡稱為HAFA)。

如果您償還抵押貸款有困難,或者預計今後可能會有困

難,應當首先想到向住宅可負擔計劃求助。立刻行動起

來,看看您是不是數百萬符合資格條件的房主之一。請

瀏覽 www.MakingHomeAffordable.gov 瞭解更多資訊以

及使用網站提供的自我評估工具。

保住房屋的變通選項

如果您不符合資格條件,不能選擇住宅可負擔計劃的再

融資選項或貸款修正選項,您可以與貸款機構一起考慮

其他傳統的變通選項:

 再融資:如果您的房屋有足夠的淨值,您可以申請新

的抵押貸款來償還舊貸款,以及支付任何延誤費和律

師費。

 恢復原狀:這個選項允許您在指定日期之前一次性補

足欠款。

 債務償還期延展:您可以在一段較短的時間內減少抵

押貸款的付款額,但前提是要有其他的變通選項幫助

您付清賬戶的逾期欠款。

 償還計劃:這個選項允許您稍微增加原來的抵押貸款

每月付款額,從而在一段較短的時間內補足欠款。

 貸款修改:貸款機構或許可以重組您的抵押貸款,例

如將未付的款項算入抵押貸款的數額、調整您的利

率,甚至延長您的償還年數。
如果沒辦法繼續保住房屋

如果您無法保住或者不想保住房屋,抵押貸款公司可

以與您一起想辦法避免止贖。視您的財務狀況而定,

可用的選項包括:

 短售:如果您可以賣出住房,但賣房收入不足以償

還抵押貸款的欠款總額,貸款機構或許同意短售,

將超過賣房淨收入的那部分抵押貸款注銷。

 轉讓產權以避免止贖之契據:貸款機構或許允許您

自願將房屋產權轉讓給他們,作為交換條件,他們

則會注銷您的抵押貸款債務。

 債務讓渡:這個選項允許合格買方接手您的抵押貸

款債務和抵押貸款付款,即使抵押貸款最初不可讓

渡。

不要逃避,不要放棄;避免止贖造成

的負面影響

止贖可能造成災難性的後果: 

 您的信用等級分數將大幅下降。如果您的信用記錄

上有止贖歷史,您將來借錢、租公寓,甚至找工作

都會有困難。

 找到新家可能會有困難。您不僅必須找到負擔得起

的房屋,還需要繳交租賃押金,視您的信用評級而

定,押金數額可能很高。

 信用卡公司認為您的風險上升,他們可能會上調您

的信用卡利率。

 如果您的房屋在購買後升值,止贖可能導致您失去

數千美元的淨值。

採取行動見成效

很多家庭都難免經歷嚴重的經濟困難。有時,不起眼

的財務問題可能會變成大麻煩,如果不及時解決,可

能會破壞您的良好信用,甚至造成止贖。承認自己需

要幫助有時難以啟齒,但不要因為自尊或恐懼而放棄

尋找解決方案。如果您支付抵押貸款付款有困難,應

當立即聯絡您的貸款機構或聲譽良好的住房諮詢機

構,並努力尋找適合您的解決方案。

如需更多資訊

 瀏覽 www.MakingHomeAffordable.gov 詳細瞭解

為面臨止贖風險的房主提供幫助的聯邦計劃。

 如果需要關於預防止贖的免費諮詢服務,請聯

絡住房所有權保持基金會(Homeownership 

Preservation Foundation)的房主HOPETM熱線

888-995-HOPE,或瀏覽 www.995hope.org。

 HOPE NOW聯盟免費提供預防止贖的援助。瀏覽

FreddieMac.com/avoidforeclosure/workshops.

html 瞭解您所在地區的活動、諮詢與政府資源及其

他資訊。

 各種變通選項對您信用等級分數的影響不盡相同。

瀏覽 www.myfico.com 詳細瞭解止贖和變通方案對

您信用的影響。

 謹防騙子!瞭解您所在地區的常見騙局,並在訂立

下一份貸款協議之前獲得建議。詳細瞭解常見的騙

局:FreddieMac.com/avoidfraud。

 如果想查找您附近的HUD認定的住房諮詢機構,請

瀏覽 http://portal.hud.gov/hudportal/HUD?src=/i_

want_to/talk_to_a_housing_counselor,或致電

800-569-4287。請他們幫助您尋找能在必要時提供

財務或法律支援的合法當地服務與計劃。

 「買房需要知道的事情」(About Homeowner

ship)是房地美的一項線上指南,介紹買房流程

以及如何成功地擁有住房。瀏覽「避免止贖」

(Avoiding Foreclosure)版面:FreddieMac.com/

avoidforeclosure。

­

 房地美CreditSmart®課程為消費者提供指南,幫助他

們建立更好的信用、合理地管理資金,以及成為負

責任的房主。瀏覽 FreddieMac.com/creditsmart

下載消費者課程資源,有五種語言可供選擇。

來源

內容根據房地美屢次獲獎的多語言財務教育課程CreditSmart改編,該課程旨在幫助消費者建立和保持更好的信用,作出合理的財務

決定,以及瞭解維持房屋產權的措施。
 

來自:

出版編號829 n © 房地美版權所有,2016年12月
PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP 

Chartered Accountants

601 West Hastings Street, Suite 1400

Vancouver, British Columbia 

Canada V6B SA5

Telephone +1 (604) 806 7000

Facsimile +l (604) 806 7664

Auditors' Report

To the Shareholders of

Stream Communications Network, Inc.

We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of **Stream Communications Network, Inc.** (formerly Trooper Technologies Inc.) as at December 31, 2001 and October 31, 2001 and the consolidated statements of operations and deficit and cash flows for the two-month period ended December 31, 2001 and the year ended October 31, 2001. These financial statements are the responsibility of the company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. 

We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards in the United States and Canada. Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.

In our opinion, these consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the company as at December 31, 2001 and October 31, 2001 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the two-month period ended December 31, 2001 and the year ended October 31, 2001 in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles. As required by the British Columbia Company Act, we report that, in our opinion, these principles have been applied on a basis consistent with that of the preceding year.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers

Chartered Accountants

Vancouver, Canada

February 8, 2002

(except as to note 12, which is as of April 12, 2002)

Comments by Auditors for U.S. Readers on Canada-U.S. Reporting Difference

In the United States, reporting standards for auditors require the addition of an explanatory paragraph following the opinion paragraph when the financial statements are affected by conditions and events that cast substantial doubt on the company's ability to continue as a going concern, such as those described in note 1 to the consolidated financial statements. Our report to the shareholders dated February 8, 2002 is expressed in accordance with Canadian reporting standards which do not permit a reference to such events and conditions in the auditors' report when these are adequately disclosed in the consolidated financial statements.

PricewaterhouseCoopers

Chartered Accountants

Vancouver, Canada 

February 8, 2002

PricewaterhouseCoopers refers to the Canadian firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and other members of the worldwide PricewaterhouseCoopers organization.
Paige Johnson Seed & Agronomy LLC

Petition for Exemption (333)

Paige Johnson

1440 Ford Ave

Corwith, IA 50430

paigejseed@gmail.com

515-408-6837

Seeking a 333 Exemption. This exemption will allow me to safely and legally fly my UAS and to help 

others.

I am supplementing my business with a UAS. This technology I feel is beneficial for Iowa Growers in 

moving the bar in the yield category and monitoring fields. I will not be charging a fee for this 

technology.

This exemption would not adversely affect safety due to the parameters I will be flying my UAS in. I will 

be flying it 200 feet and lower, in the daylight, and will take all other safety precautions. 

As stated above I supplementing my business with this technology and not charging a fee for doing so. I 

will not to flying my UAS daily, only when needed. It will be flown in the proper conditions and done so 

safely.
CERiFINALREPORTMarch10,2008ChemicalsEvaluationandResearchInstitute,Japan,KurumeSponsorTitleStudymunberSTATEMENTChemicalsEvaluationandResearchInstitute,Japan,KurumeSponsorTitleStudynumberGLPSTATElY.lENTChemicalsEvaluationandResearchInstitute,Japan,Kurume-1--2--3--4--5--6--7--8--9--10--11--12--13--14--15--------16--17--18--19--20--21--22--23--24--25--26--27--28--29--30--31--32-..-33--34--35--36-.-----·-----37--38--39--40-001SfJJX;1 9±F1 2.F.J2 18.Qt617*A/I!$=T§2ilf7i%1 6o o..,.CERITESTREPORTOctober12,2007ChemicalsEvaluationandResearchInstitute,Japan,KurumeSponsorTitleStudynumberSTATEMENT33754ChemicalsEvaluationandResearchInstitute,Japan,Kurwne-1--2--3--4--5--6--7--8--9--10--11--12-----···-·-----------
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT

________________ _________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee,

v. JOHN STEPHEN KISSELL, Defendant - Appellant. No. 20-3162 (D.C. No. 5:18-CR -40001-HLT-1) (D. Kan.)

________________ _________________ ORDER AND JUDGMENT *

________________ _________________ Before MATHESON , BACHARACH , and PHILLIPS , Circuit Judges. **

________________ _________________ This matter is before the court on the parties’ Joint Motion to Vacate and Remand

. The parties jointly move this court to vacate Appellant John Stephen Kissell's sentence in light of Borden v. United States, 2021 WL 2367312 (S. Ct. June 10, 2021) (holding that criminal offense that requires only a mens rea of recklessness cannot count as a "violent felony" under the Armed Car eer Criminal Act), and to

* This order and judgment is not bi nding precedent, except under the doctrines of law of the case, res judica ta, and collateral estoppel. It may be cited, however, for its persuasive value consiste nt with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1 and 10th Cir. R. 32.1.
** Because this matter is being decide d on a joint motion to vacate and remand to the district court, the panel has determ ined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist in the determination of this appeal. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(f); 10th Cir. R. 34.1(G). The case is ther efore submitted without oral argument. FILED United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit 

### June 21, 2021 Christopher M. Wolpert Clerk of Court2 remand to the district court for further pr oceedings. The parties agree that Borden resolves this appeal in Mr. Kissell’s favor. Upon consideration, the Joint Motion to Vacate and Remand is granted. This matter is remanded with instructions to vacate Mr. Kissell’s sentence and conduct further proceedings necessary to resent ence him in accorda nce with Borden. The Clerk is directed to issue the mandate forthwith.

Entered for the Court

Per Curiam
Case 2:02-cv-04074-BWK Document 5 Filed 08/27/2002 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:02-cv-04074-BWK Document 5 Filed 08/27/2002 Page 2 of 2
**Exhibit 32.1**

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley act of 2002.
In connection with the Annual Report of Hartville Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSBfor the period ended December 31, 2004, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), I, W. Russell Smith III, President of the Company, certify, pursuant to18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; and
The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Dated: April 22, 2005     /s/ W. Russell Smith III W. Russell Smith III, CEO
No. 66199.

#### M. Pressner & Co. *v.*United States,

protest 60/14278 (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of celluloid reindeer similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 56902, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
EXHIBIT 31.1 CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER


                                  CERTIFICATION

I, Larry R. Mathews, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Heritage Financial Holding
Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a
material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements
made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not
misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as
of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

 a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that
material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
during the period in which this report is being prepared;

 b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness
of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered
by this report based on such evaluation; and

 c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control
over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent
fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting;
and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of
registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or
operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process,
summarize and report financial information; and

 b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over
financial reporting.

Date: March 29, 2004

/s/ Larry R. Mathews
-----------------------------------
Larry R. Mathews


<PAGE>
No. 53427.

protest 138665-K (San Francisco).

#### Frank P. Dow Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cole, J.

At the trial the importer identified a sample of the merchandise, exhibit 1, which he described as a hand-embroidered rug, wherein *141the design is first made and then embroidered. Exhibit 2, a letter from the collector of customs at the port of entry, contains the concession that the rugs under consideration are the same in all material respects as the merchandise passed upon in *Hudson Forwarding & Shipping Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(68 Treas. Dec. 263, T. D. 47871). From the evidence presented the claim of the plaintiff was sustained as to certain items of the merchandise set forth on the invoice.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

KEVIN HOGAN, : CIVIL ACTION 

: NO. 04-957 

Petitioner, :

:

v. :

:

FRANK D. GILLIS, et al., :

:

Respondents. : 

O R D E R 

AND NOW, this 16th day of September, 2022, in consideration 

of Petitioner’s Motion to Reopen Petition for Writ of Habeas 

Corpus Proceedings Pursuant to Rule 60(b)(2) and (6) [ECF No. 

30] and Respondent’s Response to Petitioner’s Motion [ECF No.

39] it is hereby ORDERED that Petitioner’s motion is DENIED

WITHOUT PREJUDICE. It is further ordered that:

Petitioner’s Motion to Hold Petitioner’s Rule 60(b) Motion 

in Abeyance [ECF No. 31] while he litigates in state court is 

DENIED AS MOOT; and 

Petitioner’s Motions to Inform the Court of State 

Litigation Developments [ECF Nos. 35 and 36] are GRANTED. 

BY THE COURT:

EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, J. 

______________________

Case 2:04-cv-00957-ER Document 42 Filed 09/16/22 Page 1 of 1
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 12-7909

COREY E. JOHNSON,

 Petitioner – Appellant,

v.

M. VARGO, Warden, Sussex 2 Prison,

 Respondent – Appellee,

and

UNKNOWN,

 Respondent.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern 

District of Virginia, at Richmond. Henry E. Hudson, District 

Judge. (3:12-cv-00608-JRS)

Submitted: February 26, 2013 Decided: March 1, 2013

Before MOTZ, WYNN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Corey E. Johnson, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

Corey E. Johnson seeks to appeal the district court’s 

orders denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2006) petition

and denying reconsideration. The orders are not appealable 

unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of 

appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1)(A) (2006). A certificate 

of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of 

the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) 

(2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a 

prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that 

reasonable jurists would find that the district court’s 

assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or 

wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see MillerEl v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003). When the district 

court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must 

demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is 

debatable, and that the petition states a debatable claim of the 

denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85. 

We have independently reviewed the record and conclude 

that Johnson has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, 

we deny a certificate of appealability, deny leave to proceed in 

forma pauperis, and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral 

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately 
3

presented in the materials before this court and argument would 

not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
Exhibit 32.2



CERTIFICATION



Pursuant to the requirement set forth in Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), Jeffrey J. Bairstow, Chief Financial Officer of Vitria Technology, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company)
hereby certifies that, to the best of his knowledge, as follows:



The Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2003, to which this Certification is attached as Exhibit 32.2 (the Periodic Report) fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in the Periodic Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



IN WITNESS
WHEREOF, the undersigned has set his hand hereto as of this 13th day of November, 2003.



By:

/s/ JEFFREY J. BAIRSTOWJEFFREY J. BAIRSTOW CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER




A signed
original of this written statement required by Rule 13a-14(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. §1350), has been provided to Vitria Technology,
Inc. and will be retained by Vitria Technology, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request. This certification accompanies the Form 10-Q to which it relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of Vitria Technology, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (whether made before or after the date of the
Form 10-Q), irrespective of any general incorporation language contained in such filing.
No. 58849.

protests 154805-K and 156152-K (New York).

#### L. Bamberger & Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of paper napkins the same in all material respects as those the subject of *Freund Mayer & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(39 C. C. P. A. 123, C. A. D. 474), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
EXHIBIT 32.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of World Gaming plc (the "Company") on Form
20-F for the year ended December 31, 2004 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, A. Daniel Moran, Chief
Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350, as
adopted pursuant to ss. 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the
Company.

/s/ A. Daniel Moran
---------------------------
A. Daniel Moran
Chief Executive Officer
May 23, 2005
Case 2:04-cv-00832-RBS Document 7 Filed 10/20/04 Page 1 of 2
Case 2:04-cv-00832-RBS Document 7 Filed 10/20/04 Page 2 of 2
No. 60399.

protests 193735-K, etc. (New York).

#### Burroughs-Wellcome & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of dried digitalis lanata leaves the same in all material respects as those involved in *Burroughs-Wellcome Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(35 Cust. Ct. 160, C. D. 1738) [affirmed in *United States*v. *Burroughs-Wellcome Co., Inc.,*43 C. C. P. A. 142, C. A. D. 621], the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.