alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 13.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Jens Chr. J. Christensen, Chief Financial Officer of Stream Communications Network & Media, Inc., hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

|(1) |  | the annual report on Form 20-F of Stream Communications Network & Media, Inc. for the year ended December 31, 2006 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- |  | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) |  | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Stream Communications Network & Media, Inc.                                                         





|                         |  |                              
|------------------------ |  | -----------------------------
|Dated: November 16, 2007 |  |                              
|                         |  | /s/ Jens Chr. J. Christensen 
|                         |  | Jens Chr. J. Christensen     
|                         |  | Chief Financial Officer      
|                         |  | (Principal Financial Officer)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Stream Communications Network & Media, Inc. and will be retained by Stream Communications Network & Media, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
NOT RECOMMENDED FOR FULL-TEXT PUBLICATION

File Name: 09a0260n.06

Filed: April 3, 2009

No. 07-6339 

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT

RICHARDSON M. ROBERTS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

FINAN C I A L T E C H N O L OGY

VENTURES, L.P., et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED

STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE

Before: BOGGS, Chief Judge; GIBBONS and GRIFFIN, Circuit Judges.

JULIA SMITH GIBBONS, Circuit Judge. Plaintiff-appellant Richardson M. Roberts

appeals the decision of the district court granting summary judgment for defendants-appellees

Financial Technology Ventures, L.P., and its affiliated entities (“FTV”). Roberts sued FTV to

recover a $10 million payment for agreeing to sell Verus Financial Management, Inc., a credit-card

payment processing company, to the defendants. After carefully reviewing the record, the applicable

law, the parties’ briefs, and having had the benefit of oral argument, we find that the district court’s

opinion correctly sets out the facts and the governing law. Because this court’s issuance of a full

opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose and would be duplicative, we affirm on the basis of

the district court’s well-reasoned order of October 23, 2007, granting summary judgment to FTV and

finding the agreement in question invalid and unenforceable.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE> 5

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-2000
<CASH>                                         204,729
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                  631,884
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                          0
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               836,613
<PP&E>                                       3,693,861
<DEPRECIATION>                                 207,707
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                               4,551,010
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                          214,490
<BONDS>                                        335,128
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                        698
<COMMON>                                        29,054
<OTHER-SE>                                   4,398,426
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                 4,551,010
<SALES>                                      2,470,330
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                             2,470,330
<CGS>                                        1,794,364
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                1,794,364
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               382,721
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                              22,008
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                271,237
<INCOME-TAX>                                    88,668
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            182,569
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   182,569
<EPS-BASIC>                                          0
<EPS-DILUTED>                                        0


</TABLE>
No. 51863.

#### Manne & Weill et al. *v.*United States,

protests 666805-G, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Kincheloe, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). The claim at 50 percent ad valorem under paragraph 915, plus any additional duty applicable under paragraph 924, was therefore sustained.
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

962 CA 12-00484 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., CENTRA, CARNI, SCONIERS, AND MARTOCHE, JJ.

THOMAS D. POLISOTO, M.D., AS ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ESTATE OF ROSEANN POLISOTO, DECEASED, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

V ORDER
JAMES S. COLLINS, JR., M.D., ET AL., DEFENDANTS, AND JULIA CULLIGAN, PH.D., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

PHELAN, PHELAN & DANEK, LLP, ALBANY (SYMA S. AZAM OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
LIPSITZ GREEN SCIME CAMBRIA LLP, BUFFALO (JOHN A. COLLINS OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Donna M. Siwek, J.), entered August 9, 2011. The order, insofar as appealed from, denied the motion of defendant Julia Culligan, Ph.D. for summary judgment.
Now, upon reading and filing the stipulation of withdrawal signed by the attorneys for the parties on October 11 and 16, 2012,
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs upon stipulation.

Entered: November 16, 2012 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
**Exhibit
      32**


**CERTIFICATION
      OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO**


**18
      U.S.C. Sec.1350,**


**AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO**


**SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**





In
      connection with the Annual Report of The Bluebook International Holding Company
      (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the period ended December 31, 2005 as
      filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
      "Report"), I, Mark A. Josipovich, President, Chief Executive Officer, and
      Principal Accounting Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
      Sec.1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





(1)
      The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the
      Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and





(2)
      The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
      the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/ Mark A. Josipovich*Mark A. Josipovich,*
              *Chief
                  Executive Officer, President,*
                *and
                  Principal Accounting Officer*
                *August
                  31, 2006*
No. 62426.

#### Bruce Duncan Co., Inc., a/c Nucleonic Products et al. *v.*United States,

protests 312452-K, etc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of television apparatus, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

IN RE : CIVIL ACTION 

DVI, INC. SECURITIES LITIGATION : No. 03-5336 

ORDER 

AND NOW, this 15th day of September, 2014, upon consideration of the parties’

submissions, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendant Deloitte & Touche LLP’s “Motion to 1

Exclude From Trial Any Testimony From Lead Plaintiffs’ Purported Expert Chad Coffman”

(Doc. No. 868) is DENIED. Coffman will be permitted to testify at trial as an expert on loss

causation and damages consistently with the opinions set forth in his reports dated October 1,

2008, December 17, 2008, and June 24, 2013. 

BY THE COURT: 

/s/ Legrome D. Davis

Legrome D. Davis, J. 

The parties’submissions: Defendant Deloitte & Touche LLP’s Mot. (Doc. No. 868), Mem. of Law 1

with Exs. A-E (Doc. No. 870), and Reply Br. (Doc. No. 885); Lead Plaintiffs’ Resp. with Exs. 1-4 (Doc. No.

873). The parties were permitted to respond to the Order and Memorandum, dated Nov. 18, 2013 (Doc. No.

897): see Lead Pls.’ Br. (Doc. No. 898); Def. Deloitte’s Br. (Doc. No. 899). 

Case 2:03-cv-05336-LDD Document 902 Filed 09/16/14 Page 1 of 1
No. P68/173.

protest 65/7218 (New York).

#### Kent International, Inc. *v.*United States,

Beckworth, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of connecting links of not more than 2-inch pitch, containing more than three parts per pitch, valued at 40 cents or more per pound, similar in all material *1026respects to those the subject of *Oxford International Corp.*v. *United States*(57 Cust. Ct. 125, C.D. 2740), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
```

[Congressional Bills 106th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H.J. Res. 85 Received in Senate (RDS)]

  1st Session
H. J. RES. 85

_______________________________________________________________________

                   IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

                           November 18, 1999

                                Received

_______________________________________________________________________

                            JOINT RESOLUTION

 
 Appointing the day for the convening of the second session of the One 
                        Hundred Sixth Congress.

    Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United 
States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. DAY FOR CONVENING OF SECOND SESSION OF ONE HUNDRED SIXTH 
              CONGRESS.

    The second regular session of the One Hundred Sixth Congress shall 
begin at noon on Monday, January 24, 2000.

SEC. 2. ADDITIONAL SESSION PRIOR TO CONVENING.

    If the Speaker of the House of Representatives and the Majority 
Leader of the Senate, acting jointly after consultation with the 
Minority Leader of the House of Representatives and the Minority Leader 
of the Senate, determine that it is in the public interest for the 
Members of the House of Representatives and the Senate to reassemble 
prior to the convening of the second regular session of the One Hundred 
Sixth Congress as provided in section 1--
            (1) the Speaker and Majority Leader shall so notify their 
        respective Members; and
            (2) Congress shall reassemble at noon on the second day 
        after the Members are so notified.

            Passed the House of Representatives November 18, 1999.

            Attest:

                                                 JEFF TRANDAHL,

                                                                 Clerk.
```
NOTE: This orderis nonprecedential. 

# Wniteb**~tate~** 

# <!Courtof**~peaI~** 

# fortbejfeberaI<!Circuit

STEVENL. TWENTER, Petitioner,


### v. UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, Respondent.

2012-3116

Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in case no. CH752S110627-I-1.



### ONMOTION

Before RADER, 

### ChiefJudge, LOURIE andSCHALL, 

### Circuit Judges. SCHALL, 

### CircuitJudge. 

### ORDER The court construes Steven L. Twenter's October 15, 2012 submission as a motion to vacate the court's May 4, 2012 dismissal order, recall the mandate, and to reinstate this petition for review. The United States Postal Service opposes the motion. Case: 12-3116 Document: 18 Page: 1 Filed: 11/21/2012STEVENTWENTERv. USPS 2 Failure to comply with this court's rules, including failure to file the required Fed. Cir. R. 15(c) statement concerning discrimination, may result in dismissal of an appeal for failure to prosecute. 

### Julien v. Zeringue, 864 F.2d 1572, 1574 (Fed. Cir. 1989) ("failure to comply with this court's rules, including the requirements for preparing and filing briefs, appendices and other papers, may result in dismissal ofan appeal for failure to prosecute"). The court dismissed this petition on May 4, 2012 for failure to file a Fed. Cir. R. 15(c) statement. The time to request reconsideration of that order has long passed. Fed. R. App. P. 45(a). We therefore deny Mr. Twenter's motion to reinstate. Accordingly, 

### ITIs ORDERED

### THAT: (1) The motion to reinstate is denied. (2) All pending motions are moot.
FORTHE COURT

/s/Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly Clerk

s26 Case: 12-3116 Document: 18 Page: 2 Filed: 11/21/2012
No. 58424.

protests 68771-K, etc. (Baltimore).

#### S. S. Kresge Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the items of the merchandise marked *“A”*consist of figures or articles, composed wholly or in chief value of papier máché, the same in all material respects as those the subject of Abstract 56975, the claim at 25 percent under paragraph 1403 as manufactures of papier máché, not specially provided for, was sustained. The items marked “B,” stipulated to consist of articles, composed wholly or in chief value of wood, the same (except the component material of chief value) as the merchandise involved in said Abstract 56975, were held dutiable at 33^4 percent under paragraph 412 as manufactures, composed wholly or in chief value of wood, not specially provided for.
---

Exhibit 23.1



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the
following Registration Statements:

- Form S-8 (File No. 333-105290) pertaining to the 2003 Executive
  Compensation Plan filed on May 15 2003,
- Form S-8 (File No. 333-122246) pertaining to the 2005 Executive
  Compensation Plan filed on January 25 2005,
- Form S-8 (File No. 333-140774 pertaining to the 2007 Stock Retainer Plan
  for Employees Directors and Consultants filed on February 12, 2007

of our report dated March 20, 2007 on the consolidated balance
sheets of the Company as at as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 and the results of
its operations and its cash flows and the changes in stockholders deficit for
the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 and the period from October 13, 2000
(inception) to December 31, 2006.

 DMCL DALE MATHESON
CARR-HILTON LABONTE LLP Chartered Accountants

Vancouver, Canada 
  March 30, 2007

---



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the following
  Registration Statement:

(1) Form S-8 pertaining to the Alternet Systems, Inc. 2008 Professional/Consultant
  Stock Compensation Plan filed on January 29, 2008, of our Report dated March
  20, 2007 on the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as at December 31,
  2006 and 2005 and the results of its operations and its cash flows and the changes
  in stockholders deficit for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005
  and the period from October 13, 2000 (inception) to December 31, 2006.

DMCL

DALE MATHESON CARR-HILTON LABONTE LLP 
  Chartered Accountants

Vancouver, Canada 
  January 29, 2008

---
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 06-2271
In Re: US AIRWAYS, INCORPORATED, Debtor.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PHILIP A. GARLAND, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus US AIRWAYS, INCORPORATED; OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF UNSECURED CREDITORS Of US Airways, Inc., Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema, District Judge. (1:06-cv-00539-LMB; BK-04-13819-SSM) Submitted: March 29, 2007 Decided: April 2, 2007 Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Philip A. Garland, Appellant Pro Se. Douglas Michael Foley, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Norfolk, Virginia; Sarah Beckett Boehm, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.- 2 - Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 3 - PER CURIAM: Philip A. Garland appeals the district court’s order affirming the bankruptcy court’s order denying relief on his employment discrimination claim against US Airways, Inc. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Garland v. US Airways, Inc. , No. 1:06-cv-00539-LMB (E.D. Va. Apr. 27, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
No. 50828.

#### Protests 46418-K, etc., of Hickey-Freeman Co. (Rochester).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in *John Barr*v. *United States*(11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See *John Barr*v. *United States,*324 U. S. 83, decided February 5,1945.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries. The protests were sustained to this extent.'
No. 50337.

#### Protests 970343-G, etc., of China Man Way Fur Corp. et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Oliver, P. J.

It was stipulated that the goatskins are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *United States*v. *Winograd Bros.*(32 C. C. P. A. 153, C. A. D. 302), which record was admitted in evidence herein. In accordance therewith the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.
(Reap. Dec. 10925)

#### Hemisphere Int’l Corporation *v.*United States

Entry No. 5846.

(Decided March 22, 1965)

*Sharp & Bogan*for the plaintiff.

*John W. Douglas,*Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant.

Donlon, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties:

> IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by the undersigned, subject to the approval of the Court: . ■

> 1. That the subject merchandise consists of hardboard exported from Sweden as to which the Secretary of the Treasury issued a finding of dumping, published in 89 TD 197, TD 53567, made pursuant to the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.O., 160,etsec[.).

> 2. That pursuant to Section 168 of said Antidumping Act, the appraiser reported the purchase price (Sec. 162) and the foreign market value (Sec. 164) as to the merchandise listed on Schedule A attached hereto and made a part hereof.

> 3. That pursuant to Sections 500 and 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, the appraiser appraised all of the merchandise in the appeals for appraisement enumerated on Schedule A for regular duty purposes.

> 4. That the plaintiff duly filed appeals for reappraisement as to the values referred to in the above paragraphs Nos. 2 and 3.

> 5. That at the times relevant herein the purchase price and the foreign market value under the said Antidumping Act are as specified in the aforesaid Schedule A attached hereto.

> 6. That as to all other items of merchandise not identified on Schedule A, the appraiser’s reports of purchase price and of foreign market value are correct.

> 7. That the appraiser’s findings of value under the provisions of Section 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930 as amended, are correct.

> 8. That said appeals are submitted for decision upon this stipulation and said Schedule A.

Upon the agreed facts, I find foreign market value, as defined in section 164 of the Antidumping Act of 1921 (19 U.S.C.. § 164), for the merchandise described in schedule A, attached to and made a part of this decision, and the purchase price thereof, within section 162 of said act (19 U.S.C. § 162), to be as specified in said schedule A.

As to all other items of merchandise not identified in schedule A, I find the foreign market values and purchase prices to be as reported by the appraiser.

*573In all other respects, the values of all merchandise are as returned by the appraiser.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of PC Connection, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended September 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), the undersigned, Jack Ferguson, Executive Vice President, Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

|                        |  |  |  |                                                                 
|----------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------
|                        |  | 
|Date: November 13, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/    Jack Ferguson                                            
|                        |  |  |  | Jack Ferguson                                                   
|                        |  |  |  | Executive Vice President, Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer
**Exhibit
      99.5**







CONSENT
      OF INDEPENDENT PETROLEUM ENGINEERS













We
      hereby
      consent to the use of our name in the Annual Report on Form 40-F (the "Annual
      Report") of Enerplus Resources Fund (the "Registrant"). We hereby further
      consent to the inclusion in the Annual Report of the Registrant's Annual
      Information Form dated March 12, 2007 for the year ended December 31, 2006
      which
      document makes reference to our firm and our report entitled "Appraisal Report
      as of December 31, 2006 on Certain Properties Owned by Enerplus Resources (USA)
      Corporation" dated February 1, 2007, evaluating the Registrant's oil, natural
      gas and natural gas liquids interests effective December 31, 2006.







Calgary,
                    Alberta, Canada
                  March
                      12, 2007
                DEGOLYER
                        AND MACNAUGHTON**/**s/
                      Paul J. SzatkowskiPaul
                        J. Szatkowski, P.E.
                      Senior
                        Vice President