alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
**Exhibit 23.1**

**INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT**

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-48609 of Waste Industries USA, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form S-8 of our report dated March 21, 2003 (which report expresses an unqualifiedopinion and includes an explanatory paragraph as to the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, *Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets*, effective January 1, 2002), appearing in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of theCompany for the year ended December 31, 2002. 

| /s/ DELOITTE  & TOUCHE LLP        |   |
|--------------------------------------------|--------|
|                                            |   |
| **RALEIGH, NORTH CAROLINA MARCH 21, 2003** |   |
UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 13-6066

JAMES RANDALL BRAWNER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

LEROY CARTLEDGE, sued in his individual capacity; STEVEN 

LEWIS; J. PARKER, sued in his individual capacity; FRANK

MURSIER, sued in his individual capacity; HARRISON, sued in 

his individual capacity; JAMES SLIGH, sued in his individual 

capacity; DENNIS PATTERSON, sued in his individual capacity,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of 

South Carolina, at Orangeburg. Richard Mark Gergel, District 

Judge. (5:12-cv-01889-RMG-KDW)

Submitted: March 26, 2013 Decided: March 29, 2013

Before DUNCAN, FLOYD, and THACKER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

James Randall Brawner, Appellant Pro Se. Andrew Lindemann, 

DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for 

Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

PER CURIAM:

James Randall Brawner appeals the district court’s 

order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and 

denying his motion for a preliminary injunction. We have 

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, 

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. 

Brawner v. Cartledge, No. 5:12-cv-01889-RMG-KDW (D.S.C. Dec. 28, 

2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and 

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials 

before this court and argument would not aid the decisional 

process.

AFFIRMED
Case No. 13,079.

#### SMITH v. MIDDLETON.

[2 Cranch, C. C. 233.] 1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

April Term, 1821.

Judgment — Supersedeas—Sureti es.

A supersedeas judgment is absolutely void, unless acknowledged by the original defendant and two sureties.

[Cited in Chesapeake & O. Canal Co. v. Bar-croft, Case No. 2,644.]

This was a motion to quash a ca. sa. issued against Middleton alone, upon a supersedeas judgment against Alexander McCormick, and the defendant Middleton. The judgment was confessed by McCormick with only one-surety, whereas the act of Maryland of 1791 (chapter 67) requires that the judgment should be confessed by the principal and two-other persons.

Mr. Key, for defendant,

contended that the supersedeas judgment was a mere nullity. It was a special jurisdiction given to a magistrate out of court, and must be strictly conformable to the power given by the statute, or it is absolutely void.

Mr. Taney, contra.

The statute requiring two sureties was for the benefit of the plaintiff, and he alone has a right to complain, if only one be taken. The principal debtor has had the full benefit of the supersedeas, and the plaintiff had waived the error.

THE COURT

(nem. con.) stopped Mr. Key in reply, and said that the supersedeas judgment was absolutely void.

Ca. sa. quashed.
EXHIBIT 32.1

               CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                       AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
                        OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


The undersigned  hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Executive  Officer of
Belair Capital Fund LLC (the Fund), that based on his knowledge:

(a)  the  Quarterly  Report of the Fund on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March
     31, 2004 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a)
     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

(b)  the information  contained in the Report fairly  presents,  in all material
     respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Fund
     for such period.



Date:  May 10, 2004


                                       /s/ Thomas E. Faust Jr.
                                       -----------------------
                                       Thomas E. Faust Jr.
                                       Chief Executive Officer
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Lex Smith, the Chief Executive Officer of Shoshone Silver
Mining Company (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company, for the
      fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) oar 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                        



| | By:    | /s/ Lex Smith                                  
| | ------ | -----------------------------------------------
| |        |                                                
| | Name:  | Lex Smith                                      
| | Title: | President and Principal Executive
      Officer
| | Date:  | November 30, 2007                              



A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-KSB to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-KSB), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
<PAGE>


Exhibit 99.2





PRINCIPAL FINANCIAL OFFICER CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS
       ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of CNBC Bancorp ("CNBC") on Form 10-QSB
for the period ending September 30, 2002, as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the undersigned Principal
Financial Officer of CNBC hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         (3)      The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13
                  (a) or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934: and

         (4)      The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and results of
                  operations of CNBC.



/s/ Pamela S. Miller
--------------------------------------------------
Pamela S. Miller, Treasurer, CNBC Bancorp
Chief Financial Officer, Commerce National Bank



November 13, 2002
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

CHARLES CAVITT :

: CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-CV-4139

Plaintiff, :

:

v. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION;

BAYER AG;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE;

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM

:

:

:

:

:

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

:

Defendants. :

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of the Court:

Kindly enter the appearances of Hope S. Freiwald, Aline Fairweather, Erin

Brennan and Kirstin J. Miller as attorneys for defendant GlaxoSmithKline PLC.

Respectfully Submitted,

_____________________________ _____________________________

Hope S. Freiwald Aline Fairweather

_____________________________ _____________________________

Erin Brennan Kirstin J. Miller

DECHERT PRICE & RHOADS

4000 Bell Atlantic Tower

1717 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2793

(215) 994-4000

Case 2:02-cv-04139-RBS Document 7 Filed 09/11/2002 Page 1 of 1
August 9, 1951

No. 55810.

protest 134464-K.

#### Strachan Shipping Company *v.*United States,

C. D. 1340. Motion of Government for rehearing denied.
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of PC Connection, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), the undersigned, Patricia Gallup, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.



|                   |  |  |  |                        
|------------------ |  |  |  | -----------------------
|Date: May 12, 2011 |  |  |  | /s/    PATRICIA GALLUP 
|                   |  |  |  | Patricia Gallup        
|                   |  |  |  | Chief Executive Officer
[Letterhead of DANZIGER & HOCHMAN]

Exhibit 23.1


November 8, 2004





Board of Directors
On The Go Healthcare, Inc.
85 Corstate Avenue
Unit #1
Concord, Ontario
L4K 4Y2

Dear Sirs:

This letter is to constitute our consent to include the audit report of On The
Go Healthcare, Inc. as of July 31, 2004 in the Registration Statement filed on
Form 10-KSB contemporaneously herewith and subject to any required amendments
thereto.


Yours very truly,

DANZIGER & HOCHMAN


/s/David Danziger
-----------------------
David Danziger

DD/ekm


<PAGE>
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

: CIVIL ACTION NOS.

:

TODD : 02-3885

WINDING : 02-3894

HEDSTROM, et al. : 02-3908

GONZALEZ, et al. : 02-3915

GOMEZ, et al. : 02-3941

MATUSZAK, et al. : 02-3944

BICK : 02-4109

ROGERS : 02-4122

ALLEN : 02-4124

BREWER : 02-4132

SHAPIRO : 02-4198

FINCH, et al. : 02-4219

WHITESIDE, et al. : 02-4245

TKACH : 02-4248

RITTHALER, et al. : 02-4263

SCHULEIN, et al. : 02-4264

WONG, et al. : 02-4278

DENTS, et al. : 02-4303

DURAN, et al. : 02-4314

:

VS. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION, et al. :

O R D E R

AND NOW, this day of July, 2002, the Court having been previously

advised that the above action cannot proceed to trial and disposition because of the following

reason:

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending disposition of a related

action.

[ ] - Order staying these proceedings pending determination of

arbitration proceedings.

[ ] - Interlocutory appeal filed.

Case 2:02-cv-04124-WY Document 2 Filed 07/10/2002 Page 1 of 2
[ X ] - Other: Case is placed into suspense pending receipt of the Case

Transfer Order from the Judicial Panel on Multi District Litigation

transferring case to District of Minnesota..

It is

ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this action closed for statistical purposes and

place the matter in the Civil Suspense File, and it is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction; and that the case be

restored to the trial docket when the action is in a status so that it may proceed to final

disposition; this order shall not prejudice the rights of the parties to this litigation.

BY THE COURT:

________________________________________

William H. Yohn, Jr., Judge

Case 2:02-cv-04124-WY Document 2 Filed 07/10/2002 Page 2 of 2
Before the Second Division,

Janauary 28, 1952

No. 56313.

protest 174129-K (New York).

#### Van Santen Co. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protest was dismissed.
Before the Third Division,

February 1, 1946

No. 50871.

#### Protests 111784-K, etc., of Henry D. Gee Co. (Seattle).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that passed upon in *Tower & Sons*v. *United States*(14 Cust. Ct. 94, C. D. 919). In accordance therewith the claim for free entry was sustained.
I

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. R. 1079

To provide for equitable retirement for military reserve technicians who are

covered under the Federal Employment Retirement System or the Civil

Service Retirement System.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

MARCH 11, 1999

Mr. ABERCROMBIE (for himself, Mr. KILDEE, Mr. RUSH, Mr. UNDERWOOD,

Mrs. MINK of Hawaii, Ms. KILPATRICK, Mr. KENNEDY of Rhode Island,

Mr. SHOWS, Mrs. JONES of Ohio, Mr. FROST, Mr. BRADY of Pennsylvania, Mr. PAYNE, Mr. COOK, Mr. CAMP, Mr. THOMPSON of Mississippi,

Mr. SHERMAN, Mr. JEFFERSON, Mr. HINCHEY, Ms. BROWN of Florida,

Mr. BLAGOJEVICH, Mr. KLECZKA, Mrs. CAPPS, Mrs. MYRICK, Ms.

STABENOW, and Mr. OBERSTAR) introduced the following bill; which was

referred to the Committee on Government Reform

A BILL

To provide for equitable retirement for military reserve technicians who are covered under the Federal Employment

Retirement System or the Civil Service Retirement System.

1 Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representa2 tives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
2

•HR 1079 IH

1 SECTION 1. EQUITABLE RETIREMENT FOR MILITARY RE2 SERVE TECHNICIANS.

3 (a) TECHNICIANS COVERED BY CSRS.—Section

4 8336 of title 5, United States Code, is amended by adding

5 at the end the following new subsection:

6 ‘‘(p) A military reserve technician (as that term is

7 defined in section 8401(30) of this title), is entitled to an

8 annuity if such technician—

9 ‘‘(1) is separated from service as a military re10 serve technician after becoming 50 years of age and

11 completing 20 years of such service; or

12 ‘‘(2) is separated from service as a military re13 serve technician after completing 25 years of such

14 service.’’.

15 (b) TECHNICIANS COVERED BY FERS.—Section

16 8414(c) of such title is amended—

17 (1) by inserting ‘‘(1)’’ after ‘‘(c)’’; and

18 (2) by adding at the end the following new

19 paragraph:

20 ‘‘(2) A military reserve technician is entitled to an

21 annuity if such technician—

22 ‘‘(1) is separated from service as a military re23 serve technician after becoming 50 years of age and

24 completing 20 years of such service; or
3

•HR 1079 IH

1 ‘‘(2) is separated from service as a military re2 serve technician after completing 25 years of such

3 service.’’.

4 (c) APPLICABILITY.—The amendments made by this

5 section shall apply with respect to a separation from serv6 ice as a military reserve technician (as that term is defined

7 in section 8401(30) of title 5, United States Code) occur8 ring on or after the date of the enactment of this Act.

Æ
No. 49057.

#### Protest 101302-K of New York Mdse. Co., Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel and on the authority of *United States*v. *Heinrich Herrmann & Weiss*(26 C. C. P. A. 292, C. A. D. 30), which record was incorporated herein, the protest was sustained to this extent.
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE> 5
<LEGEND>
THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEET, CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS
ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.
</LEGEND>
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                               MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                                           2,247
<SECURITIES>                                         0
<RECEIVABLES>                                   30,460
<ALLOWANCES>                                     1,575
<INVENTORY>                                     54,265
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                                91,253
<PP&E>                                          82,566
<DEPRECIATION>                                  33,435
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 166,296
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           47,583
<BONDS>                                        132,426
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                            20
<OTHER-SE>                                    (15,050)
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   166,296
<SALES>                                         47,367
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                47,367
<CGS>                                           37,017
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   37,017
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                                 9,125
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                               3,580
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (2,261)
<INCOME-TAX>                                     (111)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                            (2,150)
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                   (2,150)
<EPS-BASIC>                                     (1.08)
<EPS-DILUTED>                                   (1.08)


</TABLE>
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.2


               CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


         In connection with the Quarterly Report of ebank.com, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending June 30, 2002, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Wayne W. Byers, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that:

         3.       The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         4.       The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.




                                      /s/  Wayne W. Byers
                                     -------------------------------------------
                                     Wayne W. Byers
                                     Chief Financial Officer
                                     August 14, 2002
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 66-18 Filed 08/14/2009 Page 1 of 3
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 66-18 Filed 08/14/2009 Page 2 of 3
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 66-18 Filed 08/14/2009 Page 3 of 3
Case No. 9,681.

#### The M. M. CALEB.

[5 Ben. 163.] 1

District Court, E. D. New York.

May, 1871.2

Damages — Maritime Tort — Tow-boat and Tow.

A boat in tow of a steamtug was run on shore by reason of the-breaking of the rudder-chain of the tug-boat. The chain was worn out and insufficient, and this was known to the owner of the tug when the boat was taken in tow. *Held,*that, to tow the boat while having such a rudder-chain was negligence, and that the tow-boat was liable for the damage.

In admiralty.

R. D. Benedict and F. A. Wilcox, for li-bellants.

Scudder & Carter, for respondents.

1

 [Reported by Robert D. Benedict, Esq., and here reprinted by permission.]

2

 [Affirmed in Case No. 9,083.]

BENEDICT, District Judge.

It is clear upon the evidence that the libellant’s vessel, while being towed by the steam tug Caleb, was run on shore by reason of the breaking of the rudder-chain of the tug. It is equally clear that the breaking of the rudder-chain was owing to a palpable defect in the chain itself. The tug’s rudder-chain was worn out and insufficient, and this was known to the claimant at the time the libellant’s vessel was taken in tow.. It was manifest negligence to attempt to tow the libellant’s boat with such a chain, and the tug is accordingly responsible for the damages which ensued. Deere? for the libellants, with an order of reference.

[An appeal was taken to the circuit court, which affirmed the decree above entered, but allowed the claimants to take proof upon the question of certain set-offs, should they so desire.. Case No. 9,6S3.]
##### 



Exhibit 23.1 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS We consent to the inclusion in the Form 10-KSB being filed under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 by Hartville Group, Inc. and subsidiaries of our report dated April 20, 2005, relating
to our audits of the consolidated balance sheets of Hartville Group, Inc. and subsidiaries as of
December 31, 2004 and the related Consolidated Statements of Income, Consolidated Changes in
Stockholders Equity, and Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the year then ended. BDO SEIDMAN, LLP /s/ BDO Seidman LLPBDO Seidman, LLPGrand Rapids, Michigan
April 22, 2005




---



##### 



CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS   We consent to the inclusion in the Form 10-KSB being filed under the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 by Hartville Group, Inc. and subsidiaries of our report dated January 29, 2004 (except
for Note 8 which is as of April 1, 2005), relating to our audits of the consolidated balance sheets
of Hartville Group, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2003 and the related Consolidated
Statements of Income, Consolidated Changes in Stockholders Equity, and Consolidated Statements of
Cash Flows for the year then ended. Pollard-Kelley Auditing Services, Inc./s/ Pollard-Kelley Auditing Services, Inc.Pollard-Kelley Auditing Services, Inc.Fairlawn, Ohio
April 22, 2005