T h i s d i s p o s i t i o n i s n o t ap p ro p ri ate f or publication and is not prec edent except as * provided by

9th Cir. R. 36-3. The Honorable James G. Carr , Senior District Judg e for the U.S. District Court for ** the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation. NOT F OR P UB L I CAT I ON UN I TE D STATE S C OU RT OF APPE ALS FOR T HE NI NTH CI RC UI T B AR B AR A J . HA MI L T ON , P la in tif

f - A p p e lla n t, v. C OMMI S S I ON E R OF S OC I AL S E C UR I T Y A DMI NI S T R AT I ON , D ef

endant- A pp el l ee . N o. 11- 15140 D . C . N o . 1 : 0 9 - c v - 0 1 4 2 7 - S MS ME MOR AN DU M *

A pp ea l fr om the U ni t ed S t at es D i stri ctC ou rt f o rth e E a s te rn D is tr ic t o f C a lif o rn ia S a ndr aM . S ny de r , M a gi s tr a t e J udge , P r e s i di ng A r gue d and S ubm i tt e d N ove m be r30, 2011 S a n F r a n c is c o , C a lif

o rn ia B ef ore: T H O M A S and C L IF T O N , C i rc ui tJudg es , and C A R R , S eni or D i stri ct Judg e. ** A p p e lla n t B a rb a r aJ . H a m ilto n ap p e a ls th e d e n ia l o f S o c ia l S e c u r ityd is ab ility be ne f i t s . W e rev erse a nd r e m a nd. B e c aus e the pa rt i e s a r e f a m i l i a rw i th the f

a c t s a nd the procedural hi st ory, w e w i l l no tre coun tthem here . 

# FI LED JAN 03 2 012 M OLLY C. DW Y ER, CLERK U . S. C O U R T OF APPE ALS- 2-

H a m ilto n c o n te n d s th a t th e A L J ’s f in d in g o f f a c t th a t s h e m u s t b e ab le to “s it and st and atw i l l ” m andat ed a f i nd i ng of di sabl ed gi ven h erage, educat i on , w ork e xpe r i e nc e , a nd r e s i dua l f unc t i ona l c apa c i ty( R F C ) . A f i ndi ng tha tac l a i m a ntm us tbe abl e t o s i ta nds t a nda tw i l l do e s no tne c e s s a r i l yl e a ve on l ys e de nt a rya ndun s ki l l ed p o s itio n s ( a n d th e r e f

o r e d o e s n o t au to m a tic a llym a n d a te af in d in g o f d is ab le din a ll c a s e s ) u n d e rth e M e d ic a l- V o c a tio n a l G u id e lin e s . H am i l t on cont ends, ho w ev er , thatthe A L J’ s hypothet i ca l t o the vo ca t i on al e xpe rt( V E ) di d nota c c ur a t e l y i nc orpor a t e the a tw i l l s i t/ s t a nd opt i on. T o be s ur e , the h yp o th et i c a l c oul d be c ons true d a s a c c ur a t e l ys t a t i ng H a m i l t on’ s R F C . B utthe l i ght p o s itio n s th e V E p o in te d o u t to th e A L Jc a n n o t a c c o m m o d a te H a m il t o n ’s a t w ill s it/s ta n dlim ita tio n , a c c o r d in g to th e V E ’s o w n te s tim o n y . T he A L Js houl d ha ve r e s ol ve d the di s c r e pa nc ybe tw e e n the h yp o the t i c a l he po se d and the V E ’ s r es po nse bef ore he r el i ed on the V E t es t i m on y t o con cl ud e there a r e s u f f ic ie n t jo b s A p p e lla n t c a n p e r f o rm a n dth e r e o n d e n ie db e n e f its . S u b stan ti al ev id en ce d o es n o t su p p o r t a f in d in g o f d isab il ity w h er e th e V E ’s te s tim o n ye ith e ris c o n tr a d ic to ryo rr e s p o n d s to a n in a c c u r a te h yp o th e tic a l. T aylor v. C om m ’ rof

Soc i al Se c . A dm i n. , 6 5 9 F .3 d1 2 2 8 , 1 2 3 5 ( 9 th C ir . 2 0 1 1 ) .- 3-

A n i m m edi at e aw ar d o f benefi ts is n o t nec es saryhere , w here the di sc re pancy c a n b e r e s o lv e d b yr e m a n d in g to th e S o c ia l S e c u r ityA d m in is tr a tio n . M arci a v. Sul l i v an , 9 0 0 F .2 d 1 7 2 , 1 7 6 ( 9 th C ir . 1 9 9 0 ) . R E VE R S E D A ND R E MAND E D.