alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council

          - [Docket No. AS23-17]

# AGENCY:

Appraisal Subcommittee of the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council.

# ACTION:

Notice of meeting.

*Description:*                     In accordance with section 1104(b) of title XI of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act of 1989, as amended, notice is hereby given that the Appraisal Subcommittee (ASC) will meet in open session for its regular meeting:                

*Location:*                     This will be a virtual meeting via Webex. Please visit the agency's homepage (                    *www.asc.gov*) and access the provided registration link in the News and Events section. You MUST register in advance to attend this Meeting.                

*Date:*                     November 15, 2023.                

*Time:*                     10:00 a.m. ET.                

*Status:*                     Open.                

## Reports

Chair

Executive Director

Delegated State Compliance Reviews

Grants Director

Financial Manager

## Action and Discussion Items

Approval of Minutes

September 13, 2023 Quarterly Meeting Minutes

2024-2028 Strategic Plan

ASC Fiscal Year 2024 Notice of Funding Availability

Revised ASC Grants Handbook

*How to Attend and Observe an ASC Meeting:*                     The meeting will be open to the public via live webcast only. Visit the agency's homepage (                    *www.asc.gov*) and access the provided registration link in the News and Events section. The meeting space is intended to accommodate public attendees. However, if the space will not accommodate all requests, the ASC may refuse attendance on that reasonable basis. The use of any video or audio tape recording device, photographing device, or any other electronic or mechanical device designed for similar purposes is prohibited at ASC Meetings.                

James R. Park,

Executive Director.

[FR Doc. 2023-24762 Filed 11-8-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6700-01-P
No. 52460.

petition 6624-R (Cleveland).

#### The A. W. Fenton Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Cline, J.

From the testimony it appeared that the importer had knowledge of a new price list and believed that the formula on which previous entries had been based, which formula previously had been prepared or accepted by customs officials at Detroit, would change. The importer, therefore, consulted the appraiser at Cleveland and sent a request for information to the appraiser at Ashtabula, but they had no recent information. Although it was not stated that the appraisers were given the new price lists, the witness testified that he did not withhold any information, but submitted the invoices and all the information he had at the time of entry. On the record-presented it was held that the petitioner acted without intention to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the case or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore granted.
# What is MyHealthfinder?

Trusted information to help your family stay healthy.

## Make sure your family is up to date on preventive services.

----

See which screening tests and vaccines you or your loved ones need to stay healthy.

Why are we asking these questions?

## Want to know how to get preventive services? 

Learn how to find and access screenings, vaccines, and other preventive care you need to stay healthy. 

Check out our tips and resources

Explore health topics

## Health Conditions

### Cancer

Find out about the steps you can take to help prevent cancer.

### Diabetes

You can do a lot to lower your risk for type 2 diabetes — get started now.

### Heart Health

Take steps to lower your risk of heart problems — like checking your blood pressure regularly.

View all

## Doctor Visits

### Regular Checkups

Stay on top of your health – get regular checkups with a doctor or nurse.

### Screening Tests

Find out which screenings (medical tests) you may need this year.

### Vaccines (Shots)

Vaccines aren’t just for kids! Find out why everyone in the family needs to get important vaccines.

View all

## Healthy Living

### Mental Health and Relationships

Get tips on things like managing stress and talking to loved ones about important health topics.

### Nutrition

Making small changes to your eating habits can make a big difference for your health. Find out how to get started.

### Physical Activity

Regular physical activity is good for your health. Get tips to help you get more active. 

View all

## Pregnancy

### Doctor and Midwife Visits

Find out how your doctor or midwife can help you have a healthy pregnancy.

### Nutrition and Physical Activity

Eating healthy and staying active can help you have a healthy pregnancy — and a healthy baby.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

John J. Koresko, et al 

 v CIVIL ACTION 

 No. 04-769 

Jeff Bleiweis, et al 

NOTICE OF APPEAL 

Notice is hereby given that the Plaintiffs, John J. Koresko, V and PennMont Benefit 

Services, Inc. appeal to the United States Court of Appeal for the Third Circuit the Order of the 

Honorable Juan Sanchez entered on August 19, 2009 denying the motion to vacate the Order of 

Dismissal. 

 Respectfully submitted, 

 

 John J. Koresko, V, Esquire 

 Pro Se and on behalf of 

 PennMont Benefit Services, Inc. 

 200 West Fourth Street 

 Bridgeport, Pa. 19405 

 610-992-2200 

Case 2:04-cv-00769-JS Document 152 Filed 09/12/2009 Page 1 of 2
Certificate of Service 

 I hereby certify that the within Notice of Appeal has been served upon all interested 

counsel by regular mail or electronic means on September 12, 2009 to the persons listed below. 

 The Honorable Juan Sanchez 

 United States District Court 

 Eastern District of Pennsylvania 

 601 Market Street 

 Philadelphia, Pa. 19106 

 Craig Tractenberg, Esquire 

 Nixon Peabody, LLP 

 437 Madison Avenue 

 New York, New York 10022 

 Renee F. Bergmann, Esquire 

 Nixon Peabody, LLP 

 437 Madison Avenue 

 New York, New York 10022 

 Robert Ashbrook, Esquire 

 Dechert 

 The Cira Center 

 2929 Arch Street 

 Philadelphia, Pa. 19104 

 Diane Siegel Danoff, Esquire 

 Dechert 

 The Cira Center 

 2929 Arch Street 

 Philadelphia, Pa. 19104 

 

 

 John J. Koresko, V, Esquire 

Case 2:04-cv-00769-JS Document 152 Filed 09/12/2009 Page 2 of 2
No. 50857.

#### Protests 111002-K, etc., of C. S. Emery & Co. (St. Albans).

Opinion by

Cline, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that passed upon in *Tower & Sons*v. *United States*(14 Cust. Ct. 94, C. D. 919). In accordance therewith the claim for free entry was sustained.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

VERONICA LANGSTON :

: CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-CV-4157

Plaintiff, :

:

v. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION;

BAYER AG;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE;

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM

:

:

:

:

:

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

:

Defendants. :

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of the Court:

Kindly enter the appearances of Hope S. Freiwald, Aline Fairweather, Erin

Brennan and Kirstin J. Miller as attorneys for defendant SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a

GlaxoSmithKline.

Respectfully Submitted,

_____________________________ _____________________________

Hope S. Freiwald Aline Fairweather

_____________________________ _____________________________

Erin Brennan Kirstin J. Miller

DECHERT PRICE & RHOADS

4000 Bell Atlantic Tower

1717 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2793

(215) 994-4000

Case 2:02-cv-04157-JD Document 9 Filed 10/02/2002 Page 1 of 1
No. 50873.

#### Protests 116137-K, etc., of C. J. Tower & Sons (Buffalo).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated that the boron carbide in question is the same in all material respects as that the subject of *Tower & Sons*v. *United States*(14 Cust. Ct. 84, C. D. 917). In accordance therewith the protests were held dutiable as claimed.
(7/6/2010) Betsy Bicknell - Fw: Extension of deadline for AK Seafoods Page 1

From: <Anderson.Donaldf@epamail.epa.gov> To: <Guzzo.Lindsay@epamail.epa.gov>, <Cool.Richard@epamail.ep a.gov>, <Martic... CC: Betsy Bicknell <betsy.bicknell@erg.com>, <ann.jones@erg.c om> Date: 5/26/2010 2:31 PM Subject: Fw: Extension of deadline for AK Seafoods Questionnair e

FYI ----- Forwarded by DonaldF Anderson/DC/USEPA/US on 0 5/26/2010 02:29 PM

----- |------------> | From: | |------------> >-------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------- | |DonaldF Anderson/DC/USEPA/US | >-------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------- | |------------> | To: | |------------> >-------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------- | |paulc@ECPhillipsAlaska.com | >-------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------- | |------------> | Date: | |------------> >-------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------- | |05/26/2010 12:57 PM | >-------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------- | |------------> | Subject: | |------------> >-------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------- | |Extension of deadline for AK Seafoods Questionnaire | >-------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------- |

Paul - I need to let you know that in response to a request f rom other seafood processors, EPA has extended the deadline for all recipie nts to respond to the questionnaire. The new deadline for responding is October 1, 2010. Please feel free to contact me if you have any quest ions, Don(7/6/2010) Betsy Bicknell - Fw: Extension of deadline for AK Seafoods Page 2

Donald F. Anderson Senior Environmental Engineer Engineering and Analysis Division (4303T) Environmental Protection Agency For regular mail, balance of address is: 1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20460 Email: Anderson.DonaldF@EPA.GOV Ph: (202) 566-1021 FAX: (202) 566-1053 Express / Hand Delivery, balance of address is: EPA West - Connecting Wing; Rm 6233V 1301 Constitution Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004
No. 57180.

protest 184961-K (New York).

#### Air Clearance Assn., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It was stipulated that certain items of the merchandise consist of parts of radar equipment, the same in all material respects as the radar equipment the subject of *United States*v. *United Geophysical Company*(38 C. C. P. A. 137, C. A. D. 451). Upon the agreed statement of facts and following the authority cited, the radar equipment parts were held dutiable as claimed.
No. 58878.

protest 239948-K (San Francisco).

#### Frank P. Dow Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

*319Opinion by

Johnson, J.

An examination of tbe official reqord failing to disclose evidence sufficient to overcome tbe presumption of correctness attaching to tbe collector’s classification, the protest was overruled.
No. 49544.

#### Protests 75623-K, etc., of Thorens, Inc., et al. (New York).

Opinion by

Walker, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
# C_2015245EN.01004102.xml

| 27.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 245/41 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 245/41

---

Action brought on 22 May 2015 — Apcoa Parking Holdings v OHIM (PARKWAY)

(Case T-272/15)

(2015/C 245/50)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Apcoa Parking Holdings GmbH (Stuttgart, Germany) (represented by: A. Lohmann, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘PARKWAY’ — Application No 12 248 278

Trade mark at issue:

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 25 March 2015 in Case R 2062/2014-4

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs, including the costs incurred in the course of the appeal proceedings. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs, including the costs incurred in the course of the appeal proceedings.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
Exhibit 12.2  I, Stephen Pearce, Chief Financial Officer, certify that:  1. I have reviewed this Amendment to Annual Report on Form 20-F of Golden Goliath Resources Ltd.;  2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;  3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;  4. The companys other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the company and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; (c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the companys disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (d) Disclosed in this report any change in the companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the companys internal control over financial reporting; and  5. The companys other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the companys auditors and the audit committee of the companys board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the companys ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the companys internal control over financial reporting.   Date: June 25, 2012   /s/ Stephen Pearce Stephen Pearce, Chief Financial Officer
Fourth Court of Appeals

San Antonio, Texas

March 30, 2020

No. 04-19-00509-CR

Elizabeth Ann MARTINEZ,

Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas,

Appellee

From the 186th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas

Trial Court No. 2017CR9024B

Honorable Jefferson Moore, Judge Presiding

ORDER

 Appellant’s third request for an extension of time to file her brief is GRANTED. 

Appellant’s brief is due on or before April 22, 2020.

_________________________________

Irene Rios, Justice

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the said 

court on this 30th day of March, 2020.

___________________________________

MICHAEL A. CRUZ,

Clerk of Court
No. P67/432.

#### Famous Jobbing Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States, protests 63/19678, etc. (Los Angeles).

Bechworth, J.

The merchandise covered by the foregoing protests consists of synthetic rubber articles. In accordance with stipula*914tion of counsel that the issue herein is the specific issue in *United States*v. *Weather-Rite*Sportswear, *Inc.*(52 CCPA 7, C.A.D. 848), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
EXHIBIT 32

CERTIFICATION

Each of the undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as an officer of Foundation Capital Resources, Inc. (the "Company"), pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 that:

| | 1. | The Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m); and
| | -- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                 
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company for such period.                                                            

|Dated: March 30, 2005 | /s/ A. J. Braswell                     
|--------------------- | ---------------------------------------
|                      | A. J. Braswell,
Chief Executive Officer
|                      |                                        
|                      |                                        
|                      |                                        
|Dated: March 30, 2005 | /s/ Bobby D. Ray                       
|                      | Bobby D. Ray,
Chief Financial Officer  

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 747 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 747

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                     February 27, 2018.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the bill (H.R. 4296) to place requirements on operational 
risk capital requirements for banking organizations established by an 
appropriate Federal banking agency. All points of order against consideration of 
the bill are waived. In lieu of the amendment in the nature of a substitute 
recommended by the Committee on Financial Services now printed in the bill, an 
amendment in the nature of a substitute consisting of the text of Rules 
Committee Print 115-60, modified by the amendment printed in part A of the 
report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution, shall be 
considered as adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be considered as read. All 
points of order against provisions in the bill, as amended, are waived. The 
previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, and on 
any further amendment thereto, to final passage without intervening motion 
except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and 
ranking minority member of the Committee on Financial Services; and (2) one 
motion to recommit with or without instructions.
    Sec. 2.  Upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to consider 
in the House the bill (H.R. 4607) to amend the Economic Growth and Regulatory 
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1996 to ensure that Federal financial regulators 
perform a comprehensive review of regulations to identify outdated or otherwise 
unnecessary regulatory requirements imposed on covered persons, and for other 
purposes. All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. An 
amendment in the nature of a substitute consisting of the text of Rules 
Committee Print 115-61, modified by the amendment printed in part B of the 
report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution, shall be 
considered as adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be considered as read. All 
points of order against provisions in the bill, as amended, are waived. The 
previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, and on 
any further amendment thereto, to final passage without intervening motion 
except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and 
ranking minority member of the Committee on Financial Services; and (2) one 
motion to recommit with or without instructions.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```