alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
<PAGE>
                                                                    EXHIBIT 31.2

I, Norman G. Haisler, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-QSB of Blue Ridge
   Energy, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue
   statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to
   make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such
   statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by
   this quarterly report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
   information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material
   respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the
   registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
   establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
   in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

    a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material
       information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated
       subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
       particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being
       prepared;


    b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and
       procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the
       effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of
       the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

    c) disclosed in this quarterly report any significant changes in the
    registrant's internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during
    the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected,
    or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal
    controls over financial reporting.

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our
   most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee
   of registrant's board of directors:

    a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal
       controls over financial reporting which could adversely affect the
       registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
       data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material
       weakness in internal controls over financial reporting.

    b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other
       employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal
       controls over financial reporting.

Date: November 14, 2003                  /s/ Norman G. Haisler
                                         Chief Financial Officer

                                       22
---

EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF
THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

I, Lex Smith, the Chief Executive Officer of Shoshone Silver
Mining Company (the Company), hereby certify pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that
to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company, for the
      fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) oar 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                       
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                      



| | By:    | /s/ Lex Smith                                  
| | ------ | -----------------------------------------------
| |        |                                                
| | Name:  | Lex Smith                                      
| | Title: | President and Principal Executive
      Officer
| | Date:  | April 15, 2008                                 





A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the Company
and will be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange
Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-K to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-K), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
|EXHIBIT 32.1
|------------



|CERTIFICATIONS PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
|---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The undersigned hereby certifies in his capacity as Chief Executive Officer of Belair Capital Fund LLC (the Fund), that based on his knowledge:

|(a) | the Quarterly Report of the Fund on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
|--- | ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   
|(b) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and the results of operations of the Fund for such period.                                       
|   



|Date: August 9, 2005
|--------------------



| | /s/ Thomas E. Faust Jr.Thomas E. Faust Jr.Chief Executive Officer
| | -----------------------------------------------------------------

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Fund and will be retained by the Fund and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

---
No. 51896.

#### Alfred Kohlberg, Inc. *v.*United States,

petition 6560-R (New York).

Cole, Judge:

The provisions of section 489, Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1489), are invoked in this case to obtain remission of additional duties accruing by reason of the final appraised values exceeding the entered values of bleached sheer linens exported from Belfast, Ireland, and entered at the port of New York.

Two witnesses appeared herein, i. e., the president of the petitioner corporation and the United States examiner who advisorily appraised the merchandise. Their testimony agrees in showing that prior to entry petitioner made inquiry of customs officials, through officially recognized submission sheets (exhibits 1 and 2), for information concerning market value; that the United States examiner advised entry to be made at the quotation appearing on the latest price list (collective exhibit 3) of the foreign shipper’s New York representative; and that petitioner declined to do so, preferring to enter at the lower invoice price, being the purchase price for the merchandise.

The United States examiner also stated that he called the importer’s attention to a notation on the invoices relating to home market value which appeared to agree with the amount quoted in the price list previously mentioned, and recalled “having had two telephone conversations with someone who I believed to be Mr. Kohlberg or it may have been some representative of his, and they indicated at the time that they desired me to advance it.” (R. 45.)

The president of the petitioner corporation testified that entry was made at the lower value, permitting the appraiser’s advance, upon the belief that the entered value would be supported by determination of the issue then pending in *133a case ultimately reported as *White Lamb Finlay, Inc.*v. *United States,*29 C. C. P. A. 199, C. A. D. 192.

A new principle of law was enunciated in the cited case, holding that the statutory language "freely offered for sale to all purchasers” in section 402 (d), Tariff Act of 1930, was free from ambiguity and did not require a sale of the product offered. The conclusion was unfavorable to the importer who had contended that there should be actual delivery under the freely offered price before it could apply for customs purposes.

Because of the controlling effect of the *White Lamb Finlay, Inc.*case, *supra,*appeals for reappraisement, relating to the entries in question, were abandoned. Thus, the appraised values prevailed, with consequent imposition of additional duties now sought to be remitted.

We are satisfied from the record and all the circumstances relating to entry and final appraisement that petitioner acted in good faith, without intention to deceive the appraiser or defraud the revenue of the United States, and that the appraiser’s advance in value resulted from an honest difference of opinion between the parties. The relief asked for should be allowed.

The petition is therefore granted and judgment will be rendered accordingly.
IA

106TH CONGRESS

2D SESSION H. J. RES. 101

Recognizing the 225th birthday of the United States Army.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JUNE 8, 2000

Mr. SPENCE (for himself and Mr. SKELTON) introduced the following joint

resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Armed Services

JOINT RESOLUTION

Recognizing the 225th birthday of the United States Army.

Whereas on June 14, 1775, the Second Continental Congress, representing the citizens of 13 American colonies,

authorized the establishment of the Continental Army;

Whereas the collective expression of the pursuit of personal

freedom that caused the authorization and organization

of the United States Army led to the adoption of the

Declaration of Independence and the codification of the

new Nation’s basic principles and values in the Constitution;

Whereas for the past 225 years, the Army’s central mission

has been to fight and win the Nation’s wars;

Whereas whatever the mission, the Nation turns to its Army

for decisive victory;
2

•HJ 101 IH

Whereas the 172 battle streamers carried on the Army flag

are testament to the valor, commitment, and sacrifice of

the brave soldiers who have served the Nation in the

Army;

Whereas Valley Forge, New Orleans, Mexico City, Gettysburg, Verdun, Bataan, Normandy, Pusan, the Ia Drang

Valley, Grenada, Panama, and Kuwait are but a few of

the places where soldiers of the United States Army have

won extraordinary distinction and respect for the Nation

and its Army;

Whereas the motto of ‘‘Duty, Honor, Country’’ is the creed

by which the American soldier lives and serves;

Whereas the United States Army today is the world’s most

capable and respected ground force;

Whereas future Army forces are being prepared to conduct

quick, decisive, highly sophisticated operations anywhere,

anytime; and

Whereas no matter what the cause, location, or magnitude of

future conflicts, the Nation can rely on its Army to

produce well-trained, well-led, and highly motivated soldiers to carry out the missions entrusted to them: Now,

therefore, be it

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

3 That Congress, recognizing the historic significance of the

4 225th anniversary of the United States Army—

5 (1) expresses the appreciation of the people of

6 the United States to the Army and the soldiers who

7 have served in it for 225 years of dedicated service;
3

•HJ 101 IH

1 (2) honors the valor, commitment, and sacrifice

2 that American soldiers have displayed throughout

3 the history of the Army; and

4 (3) calls upon the President to issue a

5 proclamation—

6 (A) recognizing the 225th birthday of the

7 United States Army and the dedicated service

8 of the soldiers who have served in the Army;

9 and

10 (B) calling upon the people of the United

11 States to observe that anniversary with appro12 priate ceremonies and activities.

Æ
H. Res. 844 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

April 25, 2018. 

Resolved, That the following named Member be, and is 

hereby, elected to the following standing committee of the 

House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON ARMED SERVICES: Mr. Mitchell. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
No. 55824.

protests 140202-K, etc. (New York).

#### Century Commercial Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 23.2

                          CONSENT OF KATZ & MILLER LLP



The Board of Trustees of
SpeedFam International, Inc. Employees'
Savings and Profit Sharing Plan and Trust:

We consent to incorporation by reference in the registration statement on Form
S-8 as filed on November 27, 1996 of SpeedFam International, Inc. of our report
dated August 20, 1997, relating to the Statement of Net Assets Available for
Plan Benefits of SpeedFam International, Inc. Employees' Savings and Profit
Sharing Plan and Trust as of May 31, 1997, and the related Statement of Changes
in Net Assets Available for Plan Benefits for the year ended May 31, 1997, which
report appears in the May 31, 1998 annual report on Form 11-K of SpeedFam
International, Inc. Employees' Savings and Profit Sharing Plan and Trust.


/s/ Katz & Miller  LLP
-------------------------
Chicago, Illinois
November 23, 1998
Before the Second Division,

May 2, 1957

No. 60716.

#### Globe Importing Co. *v.*United States,

protest 297678-K (Philadelphia).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of ball cock assemblies, which are constituent and integral parts of toilet-box assemblies, the same in all material respects as those the subject of *The Durst Mfg. Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(36 Cust. Ct. 220, C. D. 1778), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Case No. 8,954.

#### MAGNER v. JOHNSTON.

[3 Cranch, C. C. 249.]1

Circuit Court, District of Columbia.

Dec. Term, 1827.

Sale — Time op Payment — Suit Brought— Assumpsit.

The plaintiff, in October, 1826, sold a horse to the defendant for his bill on the postmaster-general, payable on the 1st of January following. The defendant gave the bill, but countermanded it the next day; and acceptance was refused; *held,*that the plaintiff had no right of action of indebitatus assumpsit for the price of the horse, before the 1st of January.

Indebitatus assumpsit for $60, for a horse sold and delivered by the plaintiff [Thomas Magner] to the defendant [James W. Johnston]. The defendant offered evidence, that the original agreement was, that the plaintiff should sell the horse to the defendant for the plaintiff’s draft or bill on the postmaster-general for $60, payable on the 1st of January, 1827. The sale was accordingly so made, on the 19th of October, 1826. The defendant drew the bill, and delivered it to the plaintiff, who delivered the horse to the defendant. The plaintiff, on the next day countermanded the bill; and acceptance was refused; and the plaintiff on the same day, (October 20,) brought this action of indebit-atus assumpsit, for the price of the horse.

Mr. Wallach, for defendant,

contended, that the plaintiff had brought his action too soon; he should have waited till after the 1st of January. Dutton v. Solomonson, 3 Bos. & P. 582.

Mr. Morfit, contrh,

cited Chit. Bills, 128, note c; Puckford v. Maxwell, 6 Term R. 52; Stedman v. Gooch, 1 Esp. 5.

THE COURT,

(THRU STON, Circuit Judge, absent,)

at the request of the defendant’s counsel, instructed the jury, that if they should be satisfied by the evidence, that it was part of the original contract of sale, and a condition thereof, that the plaintiff should take the defendant’s draft on the postmaster-general, payable on the 1st of January, the plaintiff cannot recover in this action of indebitatus assumpsit for the price of the horse, the plaintiff having commenced his action before the 1st of January, although the defendant himself was the cause of the non-acceptance of the draft.
No. 61703.

#### Camera Equipment Co. *v.*United States,

protest 307916-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
Before the Third Division,

October 23, 1961

No. 66175.

#### “21” Brands, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 60/22917 (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that the facts and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C.C.P.A. 112, C.A.D. 351) and that 12 cases of liquor reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, were not in fact received by *351the importer. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited, it was held that duty and internal revenue tax are not assessable upon such portions of the merchandise as were reported by the inspector as manifested, not found. The protest was sustained to this extent.
No. 55125.

#### Park & Tilford Import Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 161254-K (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The protest was dismissed.
No. 53922.

#### Park & Tilford Import Corp. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 952948-G, etc. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

For the reasons stated in *Austin, Nichols & Co., Inc.*v. *United States*(22 Cust. Ct. 33, C. D. 1155), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained except as to the wines and cordials involved in protests 952948-G and 974274-G.
August 27, 1957

No. 61187.

protests 240124-K and 247117-K.

#### Dadourian Export Corporation *v.*United States,

Protests abandoned July 16, 1957. (Not published.) (Initial No. 203097-K.) Plaintiff’s application for rehearing granted.
EXHIBIT 32

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                              18 USC, SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

     In connection with the quarterly  report of Retail  Highway.com,  Inc. (the
"Company")  on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal  quarter  ended  December 31, 2003, as
filed with the Securities and Exchange  Commission  (the  AReport@),  I, Michael
Levine, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (18 U.S.C. Section 1350), that to the best
of my knowledge:

     1.   The Report fully  complies with the  requirements  of Section 13(a) or
          15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

     2.   The  information  contained  in the  Report  fairly  presents,  in all
          material respects,  the financial  condition and results of operations
          of the Company.



Dated: February 17, 2004
                                         s/Michael Levine
                                         ---------------------------------------
                                         Michael Levine, Chief Executive Officer
No. 63969.

protests 59/10904, etc. (New York).

#### Eastern Commission, Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of fish similar in all material respects to the fish blocks the subject of *The Lee Herrmann Co., a/c The Coldwater Seafood Corp*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 49, C.D. 2101), the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
EXHIBIT 13.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Amended Annual Report of China Linen Textile Industry, Ltd. (the "Company") on Form 20-F/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Huang Xiaofang, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1)The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and(2)The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.  /s/ Huang XiaofangHuang Xiaofang, Chief Financial Officer July 28, 2009
## SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK 

## Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

**983 CAF 13-00820**  PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., PERADOTTO, CARNI, AND VALENTINO, JJ.

IN THE MATTER OF KEVEN A. NUNN, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,

V ORDER
MARY J. NUNN, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

ROSEMARIE RICHARDS, SOUTH NEW BERLIN, FOR RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.
JAY D. CARR, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, OLEAN.

Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Steuben County (Peter C. Bradstreet, J.), entered May 1, 2013 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order, among other things, awarded petitioner primary physical placement of the subject child.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Family Court.

Entered: September 26, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
##### 



Exhibit 32.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report of Virage Logic Corporation (the Company) on Form 10-Q
for the period ending March 31, 2005 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the Report), I, Michael E. Seifert, Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to § 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and result of operations of the Company. /s/ Michael E. Seifert

Michael E. Seifert
Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer
May 5, 2005