Facility Address Waste description Styrene

.............................. 3.71e+00 7.42e+01 Tetrachlorobenzene, 1,2,4,5-

........... 5.75e-03 1.15e-01 Tetrachloroethane, 1,1,2,2-

............ 1.48e-01 2.96e+00 Tetrachloroethylene

.................. 5.22e-02 1.04e+00 Tetrachlorophenol, 2,3,4,6-

............ 1.10e+00 2.20e+01 Tetraethyl dithiopyrophosphate

(Sulfotep)

........................... 1.83e+05 3.66e+06
Toluene

.............................. 2.79e+01 5.58e+02 Toxaphene

........................... 5.00e-01 1.00e+01 Trichlorobenzene, 1,2,4-

............... 4.41e-01 8.82e+00 Trichloroethane, 1,1,1-

................ 4.63e+00 9.26e+01 Trichloroethane, 1,1,2-

................ 4.76e-02 9.52e-01 Trichloroethylene

..................... 1.86e-01 3.72e+00
Trichlorofluoromethane

............... 1.24e+01 2.48e+02 Trichlorophenol, 2,4,5-

................ 5.59e+00 1.12e+02 Trichlorophenol, 2,4,6-

................ 2.34e-01 4.68e+00 Trichlorophenoxyacetic acid,

2,4,5-(245-T)

........................ 1.39e+00 2.78e+01 Trichlorophenoxypropionic acid,

2,4,5-(Silvex)

........................ 1.00e+00 2.00e+01 Trichloropropane, 1,2,3-

............... 4.69e-04 9.38e-03 Trinitrobenzene, sym-

................. 3.96e+00 7.92e+01 Vinyl chloride

........................ 1.81e-03 3.62e-02 Xylenes (total)

....................... 1.95e+02 3.90e+03

(4) Changes in Operating Conditions: If WMDSPA significantly changes the treatment process or the chemicals used in the treatment process, WMDSPA may not manage the treatment sludge filter cake generated from the new process under this exclusion until it has met the following conditions: (a) WMDSPA must demonstrate that the waste meets the delisting levels set forth in Condition 3; (b) it must demonstrate that no new hazardous constituents listed in Appendix VIII of 40 CFR Part 261 have been introduced into the manufacturing or treatment process; and (c) it must obtain prior written approval from the Department to manage the waste under this exclusion.

(5) Reopener: (i) If WMDSPA discovers that a condition at the facility or an assumption related to the disposal of the excluded waste that was modeled or predicted in the petition does not occur as modeled or predicted, then WMDSPA must report any information relevant to that condition, in writing, to the Department within 10 days of discovering that condition.

(ii) Upon receiving information described in subparagraph (i) of this Condition, regardless of its source, the Department will determine whether the reported condition requires further action. Further action may include repealing the exclusion, modifying the exclusion, or other appropriate response necessary to protect human health and the environment.

[Pa.B. Doc. No. 09-2063. Filed for public inspection November 6, 2009, 9:00 a.m.]



### [ 25 PA. CODE CHS. 121 AND 129 ] **Paper, Film and Foil Surface Coating Processes**

The Environmental Quality Board (Board) proposes toamend Chapters 121 and 129 (relating to general provisions; and standards for sources), to read as set forth in Annex A.

The proposed rulemaking would amend Chapter 129 to limit emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from the use and application of coatings and cleaning 

### 6460 PROPOSED RULEMAKING

**PENNSYLVANIA BULLETIN, VOL. 39, NO. 45, NOVEMBER 7, 2009**materials in paper, film and foil surface coating processes. The proposal would add § 129.52b (relating to control of VOC emissions from paper, film and foil surface coating processes), and amend §§ 129.51 and 129.52 (relating to general; and surface coating processes). The proposal would also amend § 121.1 (relating to definitions).

This proposal was adopted by the Board at its meeting on September 15, 2009.

A. Effective Date

This proposed rulemaking will be effective upon finalform publication in the Pennsylvania Bulletin

. B. Contact Persons

For further information, contact Arleen J. Shulman, Chief, Division of Air Resource Management, P. O. Box 8468, Rachel Carson State Office Building, Harrisburg, PA 17105-8468, (717) 772-3436, or Kristen Campfield Furlan, Assistant Counsel, Bureau of Regulatory Counsel, P. O. Box 8464, Rachel Carson State Office Building, Harrisburg, PA 17105-8464, (717) 787-7060. Information regarding submitting comments on this proposal appears in Section J of this preamble. Persons with a disability may use the Pennsylvania AT&T Relay Service by calling (800) 654-5984 (TDD users) or (800) 654-5988 (voice users). This proposal is available electronically throughthe Department of Environmental Protection’s (Department) web site at www.depweb.state.pa.us (Quick Access: Public Participation).

C. Statutory Authority

This proposed rulemaking is authorized under section 5 of the Air Pollution Control Act (APCA) (35 P. S. § 4005), which in subsection (a)(1) grants the Board the authority to adopt rules and regulations for the prevention, control,reduction and abatement of air pollution in this Commonwealth, and which in subsection (a)(8) grants the Board the authority to adopt rules and regulations designed to implement the provisions of the Clean Air Act (CAA).

D. Background and Purpose

The purpose of this proposed rulemaking is to reduce VOC emissions from paper, film and foil surface coating operations. VOCs are a precursor for ozone formation. Ground-level ozone is not emitted directly by surfacecoatings to the atmosphere, but is formed by a photochemical reaction between VOCs and nitrogen oxides(NOx) in the presence of sunlight. The proposed rulemaking adopts the emission limits and other requirements of the United States Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) 2007 Control Techniques Guidelines (CTG) for paper, film and foil coating to meet Federal CAA requirements.

The EPA is responsible for establishing National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for six criteria pollutants considered harmful to public health and the environment: ozone, particulate matter, NOx, carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide and lead. The CAA established two types of NAAQS: primary standards, limits set to protect public health; and secondary standards, limits set to protect public welfare, including protection against visibility impairment and from damage to animals, crops,vegetation and buildings. The EPA has established primary and secondary ozone NAAQS to protect public health and welfare. When ground-level ozone is present in concentrations in excess of the Federal health-based 8-hour NAAQS for ozone, public health and welfare are adversely affected.Ozone exposure correlates to increased respiratory disease and higher mortality rates. Ozone can inflame and damage the lining of the lungs. Within a few days, the damaged cells are shed and replaced. Over a long time period, lung tissue may become permanently scarred, resulting in permanent loss of lung function and a lower quality of life. When ambient ozone levels are high, more people with asthma have attacks that require a doctor’s attention or use of medication. Ozone also makes people more sensitive to allergens including pet dander, pollen and dust mites, all of which can trigger asthma attacks.

The EPA has concluded that there is an association between high levels of ambient ozone and increased hospital admissions for respiratory ailments including asthma. While children, the elderly and those with respiratory problems are most at risk, even healthyindividuals may experience increased respiratory ailments and other symptoms when they are exposed to high levels of ambient ozone while engaged in activities that involve physical exertion. High levels of ozone also affect animals in ways similar to humans.

In addition to causing adverse human and animal health effects, the EPA has concluded that ozone affectsvegetation and ecosystems, leading to reductions in agricultural crop and commercial forest yields by destroying chlorophyll; reduced growth and survivability of tree seedlings; and increased plant susceptibility to disease, pests and other environmental stresses, including harsh weather. In long-lived species, these effects may become evident only after several years or even decades and have the potential for long-term adverse impacts on forest ecosystems. Ozone damage to the foliage of trees andother plants can decrease the aesthetic value of ornamental species used in residential landscaping, as well as the natural beauty of parks and recreation areas. Throughdeposition, ground-level ozone also contributes to pollution in the Chesapeake Bay. The economic value of some welfare losses due to ozone can be calculated, such as crop yield loss from both reduced seed production andvisible injury to some leaf crops, including lettuce, spinach and tobacco, as well as visible injury to ornamental plants, including grass, flowers and shrubs. Other types of welfare loss may not be quantifiable, such as the reduced aesthetic value of trees growing in heavily visited parks.

High levels of ground-level ozone can also cause damage to buildings and synthetic fibers, including nylon, and reduced visibility on roadways and in natural areas. The implementation of additional measures to address ozoneair quality nonattainment in this Commonwealth is necessary to protect the public health and welfare, animal and plant health and welfare and the environment.

In July 1997, the EPA established primary and secondary ozone standards at a level of 0.08 parts per million (ppm) averaged over 8 hours. See 62 FR 38855 (July 18, 1997). In 2004, the EPA designated 37 counties in this Commonwealth as 8-hour ozone nonattainment areas for the 1997 8-hour ozone NAAQS. This Commonwealth is meeting the 1997 standards in all areas except thefive-county Philadelphia and seven-county PittsburghBeaver Valley areas. The areas in which the 1997 standard has been attained are required to have permanent 

### PROPOSED RULEMAKING 6461

**PENNSYLVANIA BULLETIN, VOL. 39, NO. 45, NOVEMBER 7, 2009**and enforceable control measures to ensure violations do not occur for the next decade. The Commonwealth must demonstrate that the two areas currently not attaining the 1997 standard will meet the 1997 standard as expeditiously as practicable. Should these two areas notattain the standard during the 2009 ozone season, additional reductions will be required.

In March 2008, the EPA lowered the standards to 0.075 ppm averaged over 8 hours to provide even greater protection for children, other at-risk populations and the environment against the array of ozone-induced adverse health and welfare effects. See 73 FR 16436 (March 27, 2008). As required by the CAA, the Commonwealthsubmitted recommendations to the EPA in 2009 to designate 29 counties as nonattainment for the 2008 8-hour ozone NAAQS. The EPA is expected to take final action on the designation recommendation by March 2010. The EPA’s designations will take effect 60 days after the EPA publishes a notice in the Federal Register . Monitors inmost urban areas and some rural areas of this Commonwealth are currently not meeting the 2008 ozone standard.

There are no Federal statutory or regulatory limits for VOC emissions from paper, film and foil surface coating operations. State regulations to control VOC emissions from paper, film and foil surface coating operations arerequired under Federal law, however, and will be reviewed by the EPA for whether they meet the ‘‘reasonably available control technology’’ (RACT) requirements of the CAA and its implementing regulations. Consumer and Commercial Products; Control Techniques Guidelines in lieu of Regulations for Paper, Film, and Foil Coatings; Metal Furniture Coatings; and Large Appliance Coatings

, 72 FR 57215, 57218 (October 9, 2007).

Section 172(c)(1) of the CAA provides that State Implementation Plans (SIPs) for nonattainment areas must include ‘‘reasonably available control measures,’’ including RACT, for sources of emissions. 42 U.S.C.A. § 7502(c)(1). Section 182(b)(2) of the CAA provides that for moderate ozone nonattainment areas, states must revise their SIPs to include RACT for sources of VOC emission covered by a CTG document issued by the EPA prior to the area’sdate of attainment. 42 U.S.C.A. § 7511a(b)(2). More importantly, section 184(b)(1)(B) of the CAA requires that states in the Ozone Transport Region, including thisCommonwealth, submit a SIP revision requiring implementation of RACT for all sources of VOC emissions in the state covered by a specific CTG. 42 U.S.C.A. § 7511c(b)(1)(B).

Section 183(e) of the CAA directs the EPA to list for regulation those categories of products that account for at least 80% of the VOC emissions from consumer and commercial products in ozone nonattainment areas. 42 U.S.C.A. § 7511b(e). Section 183(e)(3)(C) of the CAA further provides that the EPA may issue a CTG in place of a National regulation for a product category where the EPA determines that the CTG will be ‘‘substantially as effective as regulations’’ in reducing emissions of VOC in ozone nonattainment areas. 42 U.S.C.A. § 7511b(e)(3)(C).

In 1995, the EPA listed paper, film and foil coatings on its section 183(e) list and, in 2007, issued a CTG for this product category. See 60 FR 15264 (March 23, 1995) and 72 FR 57215 (October 9, 2007). In the 2007 notice, the EPA determined that the CTG would be substantially aseffective as National regulations in reducing VOC emissions from this product category in ozone nonattainment areas. See 72 FR at p. 57220.

The CTG provides states with the EPA’s recommendation of what constitutes RACT for the covered category. States can use the recommendations provided in the CTG to inform their own determination as to what constitutes RACT for VOC emissions from the covered category. State air pollution control agencies are free to implement other technically sound approaches that are consistent with theCAA requirements and the EPA’s implementing regulations or guidelines.

The Department has reviewed the recommendations included in the 2007 CTG for paper, film and foil coatings for their applicability to the ozone reduction measures necessary for this Commonwealth. The Department has determined that the measures provided in the CTG forpaper, film and foil coatings are appropriate to be implemented in this Commonwealth as RACT for this category.

This rulemaking, if adopted as a final rule, would assist in reducing VOC emissions locally as well as reducing the transport of VOC emissions and ground-level ozone to downwind states. Adoption of VOC emission requirements for paper, film and foil surface coating operations is part of the Commonwealth’s strategy, in concert with other OTR jurisdictions, to further reduce transport of VOC ozone precursors and ground-level ozone throughout the OTR to attain and maintain the 8-hour ozone NAAQS. The proposed rulemaking is required under the CAA requirements that states regulate sources covered by CTGs issued by the EPA and is reasonably necessary to attain and maintain the health-based 8-hour ozoneNAAQS in this Commonwealth. When final, this rulemaking will be submitted to the EPA as a revision to the SIP.

The concepts of the proposed rulemaking were discussed with the Air Quality Technical Advisory Committee (AQTAC) at its October 30 and December 11, 2008, meetings. The proposed rulemaking was discussed with the AQTAC on May 28, 2009. The AQTAC concurred withthe Department’s recommendation to present the proposed amendments to the Board for approval for publication as a proposed rulemaking. One AQTAC member commented that the equation in proposed § 129.52b (c)(1)(ii) for calculating the VOC content of a dip coatingwas missing the coating density factor in the denominator. This correction was made to the proposed equation.The Department also consulted with the Citizens Advisory Council on July 21, 2009, and with the Small Business Compliance Advisory Committee on October 22, 2008, and April 22 and July 22, 2009.

E. Summary of Regulatory Requirements

This proposed rulemaking adds the term and definition of ‘‘coating line’’ to § 121.1. This proposed rulemaking also amends the definition of the term ‘‘paper coating’’ to correspond to the broader terms, ‘‘paper, film or foil coating’’ and ‘‘paper, film or foil surface coating,’’ which are used in other sections in Chapter 129 and also in this rulemaking.

The proposed rulemaking would amend § 129.51(a) to extend its coverage to paper, film and foil surface coating processes covered by this proposed rulemaking, as well as to large appliance and metal furniture surface coating 

### 6462 PROPOSED RULEMAKING

**PENNSYLVANIA BULLETIN, VOL. 39, NO. 45, NOVEMBER 7, 2009**processes and flat wood paneling surface coating processes, which are covered in parallel rulemakings. Section 129.51(a) provides an alternative method for owners and operators of facilities to achieve compliance with air emission limits.

The proposed rulemaking would amend § 129.52 byadding subparagraph (i). Section 129.52 specifies requirements and emission limits for various surface coating processes. The amendment in this proposed rulemakingwould clarify in new subparagraph (i) that the requirements and limits already specified in § 129.52 for metal furniture coatings, large appliance coatings and paper coatings are superseded by the requirements and limits that will be adopted in this proposed rulemaking and in the proposed rulemaking for large appliance and metal furniture coating processes.

The proposed rulemaking would add § 129.52b to regulate VOC emissions from paper, film and foil surface coating processes. The applicability of this new section isdescribed in subsection (a), which establishes that emission limits and other requirements of this section apply to the owner and operator of a paper, film or foil surface coating process if an individual paper, film or foil surface coating line has a potential to emit at least 25 tpy of VOC from coatings, prior to controls. This is more stringent than the current applicability threshold in § 129.52, andis consistent with the recommended applicability threshold in the CTG.

Proposed subsection (a) specifies that the emission limits and other requirements of § 129.52b supersede the emission limits and other requirements of § 129.52.

Proposed subsection (a) also establishes that the workpractice requirements specified in subsection (h) for cleaning materials, and the related compliance monitoring and recordkeeping and reporting requirements specified in subsections (d)(3) and (4) and (e), apply to the owner and operator of a paper, film or foil surface coating process if the total actual VOC emissions from all paper, film or foil surface coating operations, including related cleaning activities, at the facility are equal to or greater than 15pounds (6.8 kilograms) per day or 2.7 tons (2,455 kilograms) per 12-month rolling period, before consideration of controls. Basing the applicability on a 12-month rolling period is generally considered to be more stringent than basing it on a calendar year, as in § 129.52, but is consistent with the CTG.

Proposed subsection (b) explains that the requirements of § 129.52b supersede the requirements of a RACT permit for VOC emissions from a paper, film or foil surface coating operation already issued to the owner or operator of a source subject to § 129.52b, except to theextent the RACT permit contains more stringent requirements.

Proposed subsection (c) establishes VOC emission limits. Beginning January 1, 2011, a person may not cause or permit the emission into the outdoor atmosphere of VOCs from a paper, film or foil surface coating process, unless: (1) the VOC content of each as applied coating is equal to or less than the limit specified in Table I (relating to emission limits of VOCs for paper, film and foil surface coatings) in § 129.52b; or (2) the overall weight of VOCs emitted to the atmosphere is reduced through the use of vapor recovery, incineration or another method that is acceptable under § 129.51(a). The second option also addresses the overall efficiency of a control system.

Proposed subsection (d) identifies daily records that must be kept to demonstrate compliance with § 129.52b. An owner or operator of an individual paper, film or foil surface coating line that is subject to this section by virtue of having a potential to emit at least 25 tpy of VOC from coatings, prior to controls, must keep daily records that include the parameters and VOC content of each coating, thinner, component and cleaning solvent, as supplied, and the VOC content of each as applied coating or cleaning solvent. The daily records required of an owner or operator of a paper, film or foil surface coatingprocess subject to the cleaning material-related requirements of § 129.52b are similar but relate only to cleaning solvents.

Proposed subsection (e) requires that the records be maintained for 2 years and submitted to the Department on request.

Under proposed subsection (f), an owner or operator of an individual paper, film or foil surface coating line that is subject to § 129.52b by virtue of having a potential to emit at least 25 tpy of VOC from coatings, prior to controls, may not cause or permit the emission into the outdoor atmosphere of VOCs from the application of paper, film or foil surface coatings, unless the coatings are applied using rotogravure coating, reverse roll coating, knife coating, dip coating, slot die coating, flexographic coating, extrusion coating or calendaring. An owner or operator may use another coating application method if a request is submitted in writing that demonstrates that the method is capable of achieving a transfer efficiency equivalent to or better than that achieved by the other methods listed in subsection (f), and is approved in writing by the Department prior to use.

Proposed subsection (g) exempts from the VOC coating content limits in Table I of proposed § 129.52b a coating used exclusively for determining product quality and commercial acceptance and other small quantity coatings, if the quantity of coating used does not exceed 50 gallons per year for a single coating and a total of 200 gallons per year for all coatings combined for the facility and if the owner or operator of the facility requests, in writing, and the Department approves, in writing, the exemption prior to use of the coating.

Proposed subsection (h) establishes work practices that an owner or operator of a paper, film or foil surface coating process subject to the cleaning material-related requirements of § 129.52b must comply with, for the use or application of, cleaning materials.

Proposed Table I establishes emission limits for VOCs for paper, film and foil surface coatings, expressed in weight of VOC per weight of coating solids, as applied.

F. Benefits, Costs and Compliance Benefits

Implementation of the proposed control measure would benefit the health and welfare of the approximately 12 million humans, animals, crops, vegetation and natural areas of this Commonwealth by reducing emissions of VOCs, which are precursors to ground-level ozone airpollution. Although the proposed amendments are designed primarily to address ozone air quality, the reformulation or substitution of coating products to meet the VOC content limits applicable to users may also result in reduction of hazardous air pollutant (HAP) emissions, which are also a serious health threat.

The proposed rulemaking provides as one compliance option that coatings used on or applied to paper, film and foil products manufactured in this Commonwealth meetspecified limits for VOC content, usually through substi

### PROPOSED RULEMAKING 6463

**PENNSYLVANIA BULLETIN, VOL. 39, NO. 45, NOVEMBER 7, 2009**tution of low VOC-content solvents or water for the highVOC-content solvents. The reduced levels of high VOCcontent solvents would also benefit water quality throughreduced loading on water treatment plants and in reduced quantities of high VOC-content solvents leaching into the ground. Owners and operators of affected paper, film and foil surface coating process facilities may also reduce VOC emissions through the use of add-on controls,or a combination of complying coatings and add-on controls.

In this Commonwealth, approximately 15 paper, film and foil coating operations combine to emit an estimated total of 458 tons of VOCs per year.

The EPA estimates that implementation of the recommended control options for paper, film or foil surface coating processes will result in approximately a 47% reduction in VOC emissions. The maximum anticipated additional annual VOC reductions from the paper, film orfoil surface coating facilities as a result of this rulemaking is approximately 215 tons (458 tons × 47%). Compliance Costs

The costs of complying with the proposed new requirements include the cost of using alternative product formulations, such as low-VOC or water-based coatings, and the cost of using add-on controls such as thermal oxidizers. The facility owner or operator is given theflexibility to choose controls. Based on information provided by the EPA in the paper, film and foil coating CTG, the cost effectiveness of reducing VOC emissions from paper, film or foil surface coating operations is estimated to be $1,200 per year per ton of VOC reduced. This estimate is based on the use of thermal oxidizer add-on controls, which are the most costly option to reduce VOC emissions on an annual operating basis. The estimated total annual cost for the owners or operators of the affected noncomplying paper, film or foil surface coating facilities in this Commonwealth, combined, is $258,000 (215 tons VOC reduced per year x $1,200 per year per ton reduced). Based on total VOC emissions reported to the Department for the 2008 calendar year, the annual compliance costs for each affected noncomplying facility will range from an estimated $2,312 to an estimated $88,548, depending on actual VOC emissions.

The potential total annual costs to the regulated industry of $258,000 for paper, film or foil surface coating operations are negligible compared to the improved health and environmental benefits that would be gained from this proposed rulemaking.

The implementation of the work practice requirements for cleaning materials is expected to result in a net cost savings. The recommended work practices should reduce the amount of cleaning materials used by reducing the amount of cleaning materials lost to evaporation, spillage and waste. Compliance Assistance Plan

The Department plans to educate and assist the public and regulated community in understanding the newly revised requirements and how to comply with them. This will be accomplished through the Department’s ongoing compliance assistance program. Paperwork Requirements

The owners and operators of affected paper, film or foil surface coating operations would be required to keep daily operational records of information for coatings and cleaning solvents sufficient to demonstrate compliance, including identification of materials, VOC content and volumes used. The records must be maintained for 2 years and submitted to the Department upon request. Persons claiming the small quantity exemption or use ofexempt coating would be required to keep records demonstrating the validity of the exemption. Persons seeking to comply through the use of add-on controls would be required to meet the applicable reporting requirementsspecified in Chapter 139 (relating to sampling and testing).
G. Pollution Prevention

The Pollution Prevention Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C.A.§§ 13101—13109) established a National policy that promotes pollution prevention as the preferred means forachieving state environmental protection goals. The Department encourages pollution prevention, which is the reduction or elimination of pollution at its source, through the substitution of environmentally friendly materials, more efficient use of raw materials, and the incorporationof energy efficiency strategies. Pollution prevention practices can provide greater environmental protection with greater efficiency because they can result in significant cost savings to facilities that permanently achieve ormove beyond compliance. This regulation has incorporated the following pollution prevention incentives:

The proposed amendments will assure that the citizens and the environment of this Commonwealth experience the benefits of reduced emissions of VOCs and HAPs from paper, film and foil surface coating processes. Although the proposed amendments are designed primarily toaddress ozone air quality, the reformulation or substitution of coating products to meet the VOC content limits applicable to users may also result in reduction of HAP emissions, which are also a serious health threat. The proposed rulemaking provides as one compliance option that coatings used on or applied to paper, film and foil products manufactured in this Commonwealth meetspecified limits for VOC content, usually through substitution of low VOC-content solvents or water for the highVOC-content solvents. The reduced levels of high VOCcontent solvents would also benefit water quality throughreduced loading on water treatment plants and in reduced quantities of high VOC-content solvents leaching into the ground. Owners and operators of affected paper, film and foil surface coating process facilities may also reduce VOC emissions through the use of add-on controls,or a combination of complying coatings and add-on controls.
H. Sunset Review

These regulations will be reviewed in accordance with the sunset review schedule published by the Department to determine whether the regulations effectively fulfill the goals for which they were intended.
I. Regulatory Review

Under section 5(a) of the Regulatory Review Act (71 P. S. § 745.5(a)), on October 28, 2009, the Department submitted a copy of these proposed amendments to the Independent Regulatory Review Commission (IRRC) and the House and Senate Environmental Resources andEnergy Committees (Committees). In addition to submitting the proposed amendments, the Department has provided IRRC and the Committees with a copy of adetailed Regulatory Analysis Form prepared by the Department. A copy of this material is available to the public upon request.

Under section 5(g) of the Regulatory Review Act, IRRCmay convey any comments, recommendations or objections to the proposed rulemaking within 30 days of the 

### 6464 PROPOSED RULEMAKING

**PENNSYLVANIA BULLETIN, VOL. 39, NO. 45, NOVEMBER 7, 2009**close of the public comment period. The comments, recommendations or objections shall specify the regulatory review criteria that have not been met. The Regulatory Review Act specifies detailed procedures for review of these issues by the Department, the General Assembly and the Governor prior to final-form publication of the regulations.

J. Public Comments

Written Comments—Interested persons are invited to submit comments, suggestions or objections regarding the proposed rulemaking to the Environmental QualityBoard, P. O. Box 8477, Harrisburg, PA 17105-8477 (express mail: Rachel Carson State Office Building, 16th Floor, 400 Market Street, Harrisburg, PA 17101-2301). Comments submitted by facsimile will not be accepted. Comments, suggestions or objections must be received by the Board by January 13, 2010. Interested persons may also submit a summary of their comments to the Board. The summary may not exceed one page in length and must also be received by the Board by January 13, 2010. The one-page summary will be provided to each member of the Board in the agenda packet distributed prior to themeeting at which the final-form regulation will be considered.

Electronic Comments—Comments may be submitted electronically to the Board at RegComments@state.pa.us and must also be received by the Board by January 13, 2010. A subject heading of the proposal and a return name and address must be included in each transmission. If an acknowledgement of electronic comments is not received by the sender within 2 working days, the comments should be retransmitted to the Board to ensure receipt.

K. Public Hearings

The Board will hold public hearings in Harrisburg, Norristown and Pittsburgh for the purpose of accepting comments on this proposed rulemaking. The hearings will be held as follows: Department of Environmental Protection Southwest Regional Office Waterfront Conference Rooms A and B 400 Waterfront Drive Pittsburgh, PA 15222-4745 December 9, 2009 1 p.m.

Department of Environmental Protection Rachel Carson State Office Building Conference Room 105 400 Market Street Harrisburg, PA 17105 December 11, 2009 1 p.m.

Department of Environmental Protection Southeast Regional Office Delaware Conference Room 2 East Main Street Norristown, PA 19401 December 14, 2009 1 p.m.

Persons wishing to present testimony at a hearing are requested to contact the Environmental Quality Board, P. O. Box 8477, Harrisburg, PA 17105-8477, (717) 787- 4526, at least 1 week in advance of the hearing to reserve a time to present testimony. Oral testimony is limited to 10 minutes for each witness. Witnesses are requested to submit three written copies of their oral testimony to the hearing Chairperson at the hearing. Organizations are limited to designating one witness to present testimony on their behalf at each hearing.

Persons in need of accommodations as provided for in the Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990 should contact the Board at (717) 787-4526, or through the Pennsylvania AT&T Relay Service at (800) 654-5984 (TDD users), or (800) 654-5988 (voice users) to discuss how the Board may accommodate their needs. JOHN HANGER, Chairperson
Fiscal Note: 7-448. No fiscal impact; (8) recommends adoption.
Annex A
TITLE 25. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
PART I. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
SUBPART C. PROTECTION OF NATURAL RESOURCES
ARTICLE III. AIR RESOURCES
CHAPTER 121. GENERAL PROVISIONS
§ 121.1. Definitions.

The definitions in section 3 of the act (35 P. S. § 4003) apply to this article. In addition, the following words and terms, when used in this article, have the following meanings, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise:

***** Coating line—The equipment and activities of the manufacturing process used to apply coatings onto or into a substrate.

***** Paper , film or foil coating or paper, film or foil surface coating—Coatings applied in a uniform layer topaper and pressure-sensitive tapes regardless of substrate. The term includes related web coating processes on plastic films and decorative coatings on metal foil. The term does not include coatings applied in whole or in part as nonuniform layers such as patterns, designs or print.

*****
CHAPTER 129. STANDARDS FOR SOURCES
SOURCES OF VOCs
§ 129.51. General.

(a) Equivalency . Compliance with §§ 129.52 , 129.52a (Editor’s Note : The Department will propose to add § 129.52a at a later date.) , 129.52b, 129.52c (Editor’s Note : The Department proposed to add § 129.52c at 39 Pa.B. 6061, 6067 (October 17, 2009).) and 129.54—129.73 may be achieved by alternative methods if the following exist:

*****

(3) Compliance by a method other than the use of a low VOC coating or ink which meets the applicable emission limitation in §§ 129.52, 129.52a, 129.52b, 129.52c, 129.67 and 129.73 

### [ (relating to surface coating processes; graphic arts systems; and aerospace manufacturing and rework) 

### ] shall be determined on the basis of equal volumes of solids.

***** 

### PROPOSED RULEMAKING 6465

**PENNSYLVANIA BULLETIN, VOL. 39, NO. 45, NOVEMBER 7, 2009**(6) The alternative compliance method is incorporatedinto a plan approval or operating permit, or both, reviewed by the EPA, including the use of an air cleaning device to comply with § 129.52, § 129.52a, § 129.52b, § 129.52c, § 129.67, § 129.68(b)(2) and (c)(2) or § 129.73.

*****
§ 129.52. Surface coating processes.

*****

(i) Beginning January 1, 2011, the requirementsand limits for metal furniture coatings, large appliance coatings and paper coatings are superseded by the requirements and limits in §§ 129.52a and 129.52b (relating to control of VOC emissions from large appliance and metal furniture surface coatingprocesses; and control of VOC emissions from paper, film and foil surface coating processes), respectively.

*****

[ Editor’s Note : Section 129.52b is new and printed in regular type to enhance readability.]
§ 129.52b. Control of VOC emissions from paper,

film and foil surface coating processes.

(a) Applicability. This section applies to the owner and operator of a paper, film or foil surface coating process, as follows, if the surface coating process meets one or both of the following:

(1) The emission limits and other requirements of this section apply to the owner and operator of a paper, film or foil surface coating process if an individual paper, film or foil surface coating line has a potential to emit at least 25 tpy of VOC from coatings, prior to controls. For these processes, the emission limits and other requirements of this section supersede the emission limits and other requirements of § 129.52 (relating to surface coating processes).

(2) The work practice requirements for cleaning materials found in subsection (h), and the related compliance monitoring and recordkeeping and reporting requirements of subsections (d)(3) and (4) and (e), apply to the owner and operator of a paper, film or foil surface coating process if the total actual VOC emissions from all paper, film or foil surface coating operations, including related cleaning activities, at the facility are equal to or greater than 15 pounds (6.8 kilograms) per day or 2.7 tons (2,455kilograms) per 12-month rolling period, before consideration of controls.

(b) Existing RACT permit. The requirements of this section supersede the requirements of a RACT permit issued to the owner or operator of a source subject to subsection (a) prior to January 1, 2011, under §§ 129.91—129.95 (relating to stationary sources of NOx and VOCs) to control, reduce or minimize VOCs from a paper, film or foil surface coating process, except to theextent the RACT permit contains more stringent requirements.

(c) Emission limits. Beginning January 1, 2011, a person subject to subsection (a)(1) may not cause or permit the emission into the outdoor atmosphere of VOCs from a paper, film or foil surface coating process, unless one of the following limitations is met: (1) The VOC content of each as applied coating is equal to or less than the limit specified in Table I.

(i) The VOC content of the as applied coating, expressed in units of weight of VOC per weight of coating solids, shall be calculated as follows:
VOC B = (W

o )/(W

n )
Where:
VOC B = VOC content in lb VOC/lb of coating solids W

o = Weight percent of VOC (W

v -W

w -W

ex ) W

v = Weight percent of total volatiles (100%-weight percent solids) W

w = Weight percent of water W

ex = Weight percent of exempt solvents W

n = Weight percent of solids of the as applied coating

(ii) The VOC content of a dip coating, expressed in units of weight of VOC per weight of coating solids, shall be calculated on a 30-day rolling average basis using the following equation: 

i (Woi × D ci x Q i ) +  J (WoJ × D dJ × Q J ) VOC
A =  i (Wni × D ci × Q i )
Where:

VOC A = VOC content in lb VOC/lb of coating solids for a dip coating, calculated on a 30-day rolling average basis

W oi = Percent VOC by weight of each as supplied coating (i) added to the dip coating process, expressed as a decimal fraction (that is 55% = 0.55)

D ci = Density of each as supplied coating (i) added to the dip coating process, in pounds per gallon

Q i = Quantity of each as supplied coating (i) added to the dip coating process, in gallons

Wni = Percent solids by weight of each as supplied coating (i) added to the dip coating process, expressed as a decimal fraction

W oJ = Percent VOC by weight of each thinner (J) added to the dip coating process, expressed as a decimal fraction

D dJ = Density of each thinner (J) added to the dip coating process, in pounds per gallon

Q J = Quantity of each thinner (J) added to the dip coating process, in gallons

(iii) Sampling and testing shall be done in accordancewith the procedures and test methods specified in Chapter 139 (relating to sampling and testing).

(2) The overall weight of VOCs emitted to the atmosphere is reduced through the use of vapor recovery or incineration or another method that is acceptable under § 129.51(a) (relating to general). The overall efficiency of a control system, as determined by the test methods and procedures specified in Chapter 139, may be no less than 90% or may be no less than the equivalent overallefficiency as calculated by the following equation, whichever is less stringent: O = (1 - E/V) × 100
Where:

V = The VOC content of the as applied coating, in lb VOC/lb of coating solids.

E = The Table I limit in lb VOC /lb of coating solids. O = The overall required control efficiency.
(d) Compliance monitoring procedures. The owner or operator of a facility subject to this section shall maintain records sufficient to demonstrate compliance as follows: 

### 6466 PROPOSED RULEMAKING

**PENNSYLVANIA BULLETIN, VOL. 39, NO. 45, NOVEMBER 7, 2009**(1) The owner or operator of a facility subject to subsection (a)(1) shall maintain daily records of the following parameters for each coating, thinner, component or cleaning solvent, as supplied:

(i) Name and identification number of the coating, thinner, component or cleaning solvent.

(ii) Volume used.
(iii) Mix ratio. (iv) Density or specific gravity. (v) Weight percent of total volatiles, water, solids and exempt solvents.

(vi) VOC content. (2) The owner or operator of a facility subject to subsection (a)(1) shall maintain daily records of the VOC content of each as applied coating or cleaning solvent.

(3) The owner or operator of a facility subject to subsection (a)(2) shall maintain daily records of thefollowing parameters for each cleaning solvent, as supplied:

(i) Name and identification number of the cleaning solvent.

(ii) Volume used. (iii) Weight percent of total volatiles, water and exempt solvents.

(iv) VOC content. (4) The owner or operator of a facility subject to subsection (a)(2) shall maintain daily records of the VOC content of each as applied cleaning solvent.

(e) Recordkeeping and reporting requirements. The records required under subsection (d) shall be maintained for 2 years and submitted to the Department on request.

(f) Coating application methods. A person subject to subsection (a)(1) may not cause or permit the emission into the outdoor atmosphere of VOCs from the application of paper, film or foil surface coatings, unless the coatings are applied using one or more of the following coating application methods:

(1) Rotogravure coating. (2) Reverse roll coating. (3) Knife coating.
(4) Dip coating.
(5) Slot die coating.
(6) Flexographic coating.
(7) Extrusion coating.
(8) Calendaring.
(9) Other coating application method, if approved in writing by the Department prior to the use of the application method.

(i) The coating application method must be capable of achieving a transfer efficiency equivalent to or better than that achieved by a method listed in paragraphs (1)—(8).

(ii) The request for approval must be submitted in writing by the owner or operator of the paper, film or foil surface coating facility. (g) Exempt coatings. The VOC coating content limits in Table I do not apply to a coating used exclusively for determining product quality and commercial acceptance and other small quantity coatings, if the coating meets the following criteria:

(1) The quantity of coating used does not exceed 50 gallons per year for a single coating and a total of 200 gallons per year for all coatings combined for the facility.

(2) The owner or operator of the facility requests, in writing, and the Department approves, in writing, the exemption prior to use of the coating.

(h) Work practice requirements for cleaning materials. The owner or operator of a paper, film or foil surface coating process subject to subsection (a)(2) shall comply with the following work practices for cleaning materials:

(1) Store all VOC-containing cleaning materials and used shop towels in closed containers.

(2) Ensure that mixing and storage containers used for VOC-containing cleaning materials are kept closed at alltimes, except when depositing or removing these materials.

(3) Minimize spills of VOC-containing cleaning materials and clean up spills immediately.

(4) Convey VOC-containing cleaning materials from one location to another in closed containers or pipes.

(5) Minimize VOC emissions from cleaning of storage, mixing and conveying equipment.

Table I
Emission Limits of VOCs for Paper, Film and Foil Surface Coatings
Weight of VOC per Weight of Coating Solids, as Applied
RACT Limits

Units Pressure Sensitive Tape and Label Surface Coating Paper, Film, and Foil Surface Coating (Not

including Pressure Sensitive

Tape and Label Surface Coating) kg VOC/kg solids (lb VOC/lb solids) 0.20 0.40

kg VOC/kg coating (lb VOC/lb coating) 0.067 0.08

[Pa.B. Doc. No. 09-2064. Filed for public inspection November 6, 2009, 9:00 a.m.]



### [ **25 PA. CODE CH. 95** 

### ] **Wastewater Treatment Requirements**

The Environmental Quality Board (Board) proposes to amend 25 Pa. Code Chapter 95 (relating to WastewaterTreatment Requirements). The proposed amendments include the elimination of a redundant provision, the recognition of applicable TMDL requirements, and the establishment of new effluent standards for new sources of wastewaters containing high Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) concentrations. 

### PROPOSED RULEMAKING 6467

**PENNSYLVANIA BULLETIN, VOL. 39, NO. 45, NOVEMBER 7, 2009**