alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Legend

Identifying Element

Attribute

Amount

Conceptual Model Container

GSDM IDD v1.1: D2 - Award and Awardee Attributes (Financial Assistance)

Financial Assistance Award 

Identifying Information Assistance Transaction Unique Key Prime Award Unique Key FAIN

Award Modification Amendment Number URI SAI_Number Funding Opportunity Number

Obligation and Loan Dollar Values Non-Loans Total Funding Amount Federal Action Obligation Non Federal Funding Amount

Indirect Cost Federal Share Amount

Loans Face Value Of Direct Loan Or Loan Guarantee Original Loan Subsidy Cost

Action and Period of Performance Dates Action Date Period of Performance Start Date Period of Performance Current End DateAwarding Agency Awarding Agency Code Awarding Agency Name Awarding Sub Tier Agency Code Awarding Sub Tier Agency Name Awarding Office Code Awarding Office NameFunding Agency Funding Agency Code Funding Agency Name

Funding Sub Tier Agency Code Funding Sub Tier Agency NameFunding Office Code Funding Office Name

Recipient (UEI and Address Information) Awardee Or Recipient UEI Awardee or Recipient Legal Entity Name Ultimate Parent UEI Ultimate Parent Legal Entity Name

Legal Entity Country Code Legal Entity Country Name

Legal Entity Address Line 1Legal Entity Address Line 2

Legal Entity City Code Legal Entity City NameLegal Entity State Code Legal Entity State NameLegal Entity ZIP

Legal Entity ZIP5Legal Entity Zip Last 4

Legal Entity County Code Legal Entity County Name

Legal Entity Congressional District Legal Entity Foreign City NameLegal Entity Foreign Province NameLegal Entity Foreign Postal Code

 Place of Performance Primary Place Of Performance Code Primary Place Of Performance Scope Primary Place Of Performance City Name Primary Place Of Performance County Code Primary Place Of Performance County Name Primary Place Of Performance State Name Primary Place Of Performance ZIP+4 Primary Place Of Performance Congressional District Primary Place Of Performance Country Code Primary Place Of Performance Country Name Primary Place Of Performance Foreign Location DescriptionKey Financial Assistance Information Assistance Listing Number Assistance Listing Title Assistance Type Assistance Type Description Tag Award DescriptionAdditional Financial Assistance Information Funding Opportunity Goals Text Business Funds Indicator Business Funds Indicator Description TagRecipient (Business Types) Business Types Business Types Description TagTransaction Information Correction Delete Indicator Correction Delete Indicator Description Tag Action Type Action Type Description Tag Record Type Record Type Description Tag

Last Modified Date
AFS-12-532-E

December 7, 2012

 Exemption No. 10668

 Regulatory Docket No. FAA-2012-0967

Mr. Grant Pitzer

HoundDogAir, LLC

P.O. Box 6212

San Antonio, TX 78209

Dear Mr. Pitzer:

This letter is to inform you that we have denied your petition for exemption. It transmits our 

decision and explains its basis.

The Basis for Our Decision

By letter dated September 3, 2012, you petitioned the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 

on behalf of HoundDogAir, LLC (HDA) for an exemption from § 91.319(a)(1) and (2) of 

Title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR) to the extent necessary to allow HDA to 

operate a twin-engine, two-place, experimental amateur-built category aircraft, the Air Cam 

(Air Cam) for compensation or hire. The Air Cam will be used to carry a methane gas leak 

detector over natural gas pipelines in sparsely populated areas of the United States for 

compensation or hire while utilizing one pilot, and one sensor operator when required.

The FAA has determined that good cause exists for not publishing a summary of the petition 

in the Federal Register because the requested exemption would not set a precedent, and any 

delay in acting on this petition would be detrimental to HDA.

The FAA has issued a denial of exemption in circumstances similar in all material respects to 

those presented in your petition. In Denial of Exemption No. 8189 (copy enclosed), the FAA 

found that the use of experimental aircraft for commercial use is not, nor has it been 

considered to provide an “equivalent level of safety.” The FAA also found that the petitioner 

had not shown a grant of exemption would be in the public interest or a level of safety 

equivalent to that provided by the regulation would be maintained.
2

Having reviewed your reasons for requesting an exemption, I find that—

• they do not differ materially from those presented by the petitioner in the enclosed Denial

of Exemption No. 8189;

• the reasons stated by the FAA for granting the enclosed Denial of Exemption No. 8189

also apply to the situation you present; and 

• a grant of exemption would not be in the public interest.

Our Decision

Under the authority contained in 49 U.S.C. 40113 and 44701, which the FAA Administrator 

has delegated to me, I hereby deny HoundDogAir, LLC an exemption from 

14 CFR § 91.319(a) (1) and (2).

Sincerely,

/s/

John M. Allen

Director, Flight Standards

 Service

Enclosure
Federal Housing Finance Agency

Constitution Center

400 7th Street, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20219 

Telephone: (202) 649-3800 

Facsimile: (202) 649-1071 

www.fhfa.gov 

FHLBank System at 100 Roundtable:

Access to the FHLBank System in Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands

Friday, March 17, 2023 | 9:00 – 10:30 a.m. ChST 

1. What are the housing needs in Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands? What are the unique 

opportunities and challenges affecting your work in Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands? 

Are natural disasters and extreme weather events affecting your work and, if so, how? 

2. What role does the FHLBank System play, if any, in supporting affordable, equitable, 

sustainable, and resilient housing and homeownership in Guam and the Northern Mariana 

Islands? What role could the System play? 

3. What role does the FHLBank System play, if any, in supporting community development in 

Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands? How does economic development factor in? What role 

could the System play? 

4. What factors prevent the FHLBanks from playing a larger role, generally? Are there any factors 

that prevent the FHLBanks from working more effectively in Guam and the Northern Mariana 

Islands, specifically? If so, what are those factors, and can FHFA or the FHLBank System help 

to resolve them? 

5. Are there particular populations, market segments, or purposes that the FHLBanks may be 

uniquely positioned to support in Guam and the Northern Mariana Islands? 

6. What should the FHLBanks’ mission-related programs look like? If we could start from a blank 

slate, what would be key features? 

To submit in advance: 

• What are the unique gaps that the FHLBank can help fill in your community? 

• What is the single most important change you would recommend to best position the System to 

fulfill the role(s) you envision? If no changes are needed, why not? 

• Do you believe structural changes to the FHLBank System (e.g., consolidation, change in 

membership) would be necessary or advisable to fulfill the role(s) you envision? Why or why 

not? 

• Other bullet points outlining the points you would like to discuss
No. 62439.

#### Accurate Millinery Co. *v.*United States,

protest 326915-K (New York).

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

DAN and PAMELA HERSH :

: CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-CV-4104

Plaintiffs, :

:

v. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION;

BAYER AG;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE;

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM

:

:

:

:

:

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

:

Defendants. :

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of the Court:

Kindly enter the appearances of Hope S. Freiwald, Aline Fairweather, Erin

Brennan and Kirstin J. Miller as attorneys for defendant SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a

GlaxoSmithKline.

Respectfully Submitted,

_____________________________ _____________________________

Hope S. Freiwald Aline Fairweather

_____________________________ _____________________________

Erin Brennan Kirstin J. Miller

DECHERT PRICE & RHOADS

4000 Bell Atlantic Tower

1717 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2793

(215) 994-4000

Case 2:02-cv-04104-CG Document 8 Filed 10/02/2002 Page 1 of 1
No. 49051.

#### Protest 959797-G of Amerlux Steel Corp. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It was conclusively established that the bale ties in question are similar to those in *Wilbur-Ellis Co.*v. *United States*(26 C. C. P. A. 403, C. A. D. 47), the record in which case was incorporated herein. The claim for free entry was therefore sustained.
<PAGE>   1
                                                                    EXHIBIT 3.13

ENDORSED
STATE OF DELAWARE
SECRETARY OF STATE
DIVISION OF CORPORATIONS
FILED 05:00 PM 04/05/2001
010168715 - 3331788


                            CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT
                                       TO
                       CERTIFICATE OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
                                       OF
                     INSPIRATION MEDIA OF PENNSYLVANIA, LP.


        The undersigned, desiring to amend the Certificate of Limited
Partnership of Inspiration Media of Pennsylvania, LP does hereby certify the
following:

        1.     The name of the limited partnership is Inspiration Media of
               Pennsylvania, LP.

        2.     The name and mailing address of the sole general partner is
               amended as follows:


               NAME:                             MAILING ADDRESS:
               ----                              ---------------
               Salem Radio Operations -          4880 Santa Rose Road, Suite 300
               Pennsylvania, Inc.                Camarillo, CA 93012

        IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Certificate of
Amendment effective as of December 18, 2000.

                                    SALEM RADIO OPERATIONS -
                                    PENNSYLVANIA, INC., a
                                    Delaware corporation, as the General Partner


                                    By: /s/ Jonathan L. Block
                                        ----------------------------------------
                                        Jonathan L. Block, Vice President
EXHIBIT 32.1


                                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                    SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
                                 (18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350)

Pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (subsections (a) and
(b) of section 1350, chapter 63 of title 18, United States Code), each of the
undersigned officers of On The Go Healthcare, Inc., a Delaware corporation
(the "Company"), does hereby certify, to such officer's knowledge, that:

The Annual Report for the year ended July 31, 2005 (the "Form 10-KSB") of the
Company fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and the information contained in the
Form 10-KSB fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
condition and results of operations of the Company.


/s/  Stuart Turk
-------------------------------------
By:  Stuart Turk
Chief  Executive  Officer

October 31, 2005



 /s/ Evan Schwartzberg
-------------------------------------
By: Evan Schwartzberg
Chief Financial and Accounting Officer

October 31, 2005

<PAGE>
Exhibit 32.1 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of theSarbanes-Oxley act of 2001. In connection with the Annual Report of Hartville Group, Inc. (the “Company”) on Form 10-KSBfor the period ended December 31, 2005, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on thedate hereof (the “Report”), each of Dennis Rushovich, Chief Executive Officer and President of theCompany, and Christopher R. Sachs, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the SecuritiesExchange Act of 1934; andThe information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, thefinancial condition and results of operations of the Company.Dated: April 2, 2007         /s/ Dennis Rushovich   Dennis Rushovich, CEO          /s/ Christopher R. Sachs   Christopher R. Sachs,   Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 814 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 814

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                        April 11, 2018.
    Resolved, That the following named Member be, and is hereby, elected to the 
following standing committee of the House of Representatives:
     Committee on the Judiciary: Mr. Rothfus.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Before the Second Division,

January 5, 1945

No. 49924.

#### Protests 11648-K, etc., of Henry Pollak, Inc. (New York).

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise consists of hats or hoods composed of ramie and cellophane, similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 47291, which'record was admitted in evidence herein. In accordance therewith the merchandise was held dutiable as claimed.
Case 2:03-cv-04318-JP Document 1 Filed 07/24/03 Page 1 of 20
Case 2:03-cv-04318-JP Document 1 Filed 07/24/03 Page 2 of 20
Case 2:03-cv-04318-JP Document 1 Filed 07/24/03 Page 3 of 20
Case 2:03-cv-04318-JP Document 1 Filed 07/24/03 Page 4 of 20
Case 2:03-cv-04318-JP Document 1 Filed 07/24/03 Page 5 of 20
Case 2:03-cv-04318-JP Document 1 Filed 07/24/03 Page 6 of 20
Case 2:03-cv-04318-JP Document 1 Filed 07/24/03 Page 7 of 20
Case 2:03-cv-04318-JP Document 1 Filed 07/24/03 Page 8 of 20
Case 2:03-cv-04318-JP Document 1 Filed 07/24/03 Page 9 of 20
Case 2:03-cv-04318-JP Document 1 Filed 07/24/03 Page 10 of 20
Case 2:03-cv-04318-JP Document 1 Filed 07/24/03 Page 11 of 20
Case 2:03-cv-04318-JP Document 1 Filed 07/24/03 Page 12 of 20
Case 2:03-cv-04318-JP Document 1 Filed 07/24/03 Page 13 of 20
Case 2:03-cv-04318-JP Document 1 Filed 07/24/03 Page 14 of 20
Case 2:03-cv-04318-JP Document 1 Filed 07/24/03 Page 15 of 20
Case 2:03-cv-04318-JP Document 1 Filed 07/24/03 Page 16 of 20
Case 2:03-cv-04318-JP Document 1 Filed 07/24/03 Page 17 of 20
Case 2:03-cv-04318-JP Document 1 Filed 07/24/03 Page 18 of 20
Case 2:03-cv-04318-JP Document 1 Filed 07/24/03 Page 19 of 20
Case 2:03-cv-04318-JP Document 1 Filed 07/24/03 Page 20 of 20
No. 53375.

protests 970240-G, etc. (New York).

#### R. H. Macy & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Rao, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the gloves which were the subject of *United States*v. *Julius Kayser & Co.*(33 C. C. P. A. 179, C. A. D. 333). The claim-of the plaintiff was therefore sustained.
No. 62453.

#### Victor B. Handal & Bro., Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 329950-K (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
Exhibit 32(ii)

                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

      In connection with the annual report on Form 10-QSB/A of Dialog Group,
Inc. (the "Company") for the quarter ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), the
undersigned, Vincent DeCrescenzo, Sr., the Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, that:

      (1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
Company.

Dated: November 25, 2005                        /s/ Vincent DeCrescenzo
                                                -------------------------------
                                                Vincent DeCrescenzo, Sr. CFO
EXHIBIT 31.3


CERTIFICATION


I, Charles J. Link, Jr., certify that:


1.    I have reviewed this Amendment No. 1 to the annual report on Form 10-K of NewLink Genetics Corporation; and


2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report.


Date: April 27, 2012


/s/ Charles J. Link, Jr.Charles J. Link, Jr. Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
EXHIBIT 99.10

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO  18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,  AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Enerplus Corporation (the "Corporation") on Form 40-F for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert J. Waters, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of the Corporation certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, that:

/s/ ROBERT J. WATERS Robert J. Waters
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of Enerplus Corporation


March 9,
2012

The foregoing certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such
certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it
by reference.

---



QuickLinks
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 216 (Thursday, November 9, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 77372]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-24730]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

POSTAL SERVICE


Product Change--Priority Mail and USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] 
Negotiated Service Agreement

AGENCY: Postal Service<SUP>TM</SUP>.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the 
Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services 
contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail 
Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

DATES: Date of required notice: November 9, 2023.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The United States Postal Service[supreg] 
hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on 
November 3, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a USPS 
Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage[supreg] Contract 
95 to Competitive Product List. Documents are available at www.prc.gov, 
Docket Nos. MC2024-39, CP2024-39.

Sean Robinson,
Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.
[FR Doc. 2023-24730 Filed 11-8-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
# C_2016027EN.01006801.xml

| 25.1.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 27/68 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

25.1.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 27/68

---

Action brought on 6 November 2015 — Badica and Kardiam v Council

(Case T-619/15)

(2016/C 027/86)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Bureau d’achat de diamant Centrafrique (Badica) (Bangui, Central African Republic), Kardiam (Antwerp, Belgium) (represented by: D. Luff and L. Defalque, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: Council of the European Union

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:

| — | annul Article 1 of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1485 of 2 September 2015 and point B 1 of the Annex to that regulation in so far as the applicants are added to Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 224/2014 of 10 March 2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in the Central African Republic; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Article 1 of Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1485 of 2 September 2015 and point B 1 of the Annex to that regulation in so far as the applicants are added to Annex I to Council Regulation (EU) No 224/2014 of 10 March 2014 concerning restrictive measures in view of the situation in the Central African Republic;

| — | order the Council to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the Council to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on three pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging infringement of the rights of the defence and of the right to a fair hearing and to effective judicial protection. This plea is expressed in two parts:






  — | first part, alleging a failure on the part of the Council to notify the applicants individually of the decision to freeze funds; |
| --- | --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging infringement of the rights of the defence and of the right to a fair hearing and to effective judicial protection. This plea is expressed in two parts:

—

first part, alleging a failure on the part of the Council to notify the applicants individually of the decision to freeze funds;

| — | second part, alleging a failure to disclose the evidence and the file, and infringement of the principle of audi alteram partem and of transparency. |
| --- | --- |

—

second part, alleging a failure to disclose the evidence and the file, and infringement of the principle of audi alteram partem and of transparency.

audi alteram partem

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging an error of assessment of the facts relating to the applicants’ activities resulting in an error of law. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging an error of assessment of the facts relating to the applicants’ activities resulting in an error of law.

| 3. | Third plea in law, alleging defects in the examination carried out by the Council. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Third plea in law, alleging defects in the examination carried out by the Council.

---
No. 65365.

#### Rocca-Cuvi, Inc. *v.*United States,

protest 282024-K (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise and issues are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *The Best Foods, Inc.*(47 C.C.P.A. 163, C.A.D. 751), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.