# C_2015245EN.01003501.xml

| 27.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 245/35 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

27.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 245/35

---

Action brought on 21 May 2015 — Ferrovial and others v Commission

(Case T-252/15)

(2015/C 245/41)

Language of the case: Spanish

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Ferrovial, SA (Madrid, Spain), Ferrovial Servicios, SA (Madrid, Spain), Amey UK plc (Oxford, United Kingdom) (represented by: M. Muñoz Pérez and M. Linares Gil, lawyers)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Forms of order sought

Forms of order sought

| — | annul European Commission Decision C (2014) 7280 of 15 October 2014, on State aid SA 35550 (13/C) (ex 13/NN) (ex 12/CP) implemented by Spain; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul European Commission Decision C (2014) 7280 of 15 October 2014, on State aid SA 35550 (13/C) (ex 13/NN) (ex 12/CP) implemented by Spain;

| — | in the alternative annul Article 4(2) of that Decision, and |
| --- | --- |

—

in the alternative annul Article 4(2) of that Decision, and

| — | order the defendant institution to bear the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendant institution to bear the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

The contested decision in this case is the same as that in Case T-826/14, Spain v Commission, and Case T-12/15, Banco de Santander and Santusa v Commission.

Spain

Commission

Banco de Santander and Santusa

Commission

In support of the action, the applicant relies on five pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 296 TFEU on the ground of failure to state reasons. |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 296 TFEU on the ground of failure to state reasons.

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 107(1) TFEU, since, according to the applicants the measure under assessment does not meet the criteria to constitute state aid. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 107(1) TFEU, since, according to the applicants the measure under assessment does not meet the criteria to constitute state aid.

| 3. | Third plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 108(3) TFEU, Article 1(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999, laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty, and Article 4(1) of Regulation (EC) No 794/2004, implementing Regulation (EC) No 659/1999, since the measure under assessment does not constitute new, unlawful and incompatible aid. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Third plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 108(3) TFEU, Article 1(c) of Council Regulation (EC) No 659/1999 of 22 March 1999, laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 93 of the EC Treaty, and Article 4(1) of Regulation (EC) No 794/2004, implementing Regulation (EC) No 659/1999, since the measure under assessment does not constitute new, unlawful and incompatible aid.

| 4. | Fourth plea in law, alleging the invalidity of Article 4(2) of the Third Decision on the ground of infringement of Article 14(1) of Regulation No 659/1999, by failing to limit the recovery order in the same terms as the first two decisions did (acquisitions earlier than 21 December 2007). |
| --- | --- |

4.

Fourth plea in law, alleging the invalidity of Article 4(2) of the Third Decision on the ground of infringement of Article 14(1) of Regulation No 659/1999, by failing to limit the recovery order in the same terms as the first two decisions did (acquisitions earlier than 21 December 2007).

| 5. | Fifth plea in law, alleging the invalidity of Article 4 of the Third Decision (recovery order) on the ground of infringement of Article 14(1) of Regulation No 659/1999, by not excluding indirect operations before 10 March 2005 from the recovery order. |
| --- | --- |

5.

Fifth plea in law, alleging the invalidity of Article 4 of the Third Decision (recovery order) on the ground of infringement of Article 14(1) of Regulation No 659/1999, by not excluding indirect operations before 10 March 2005 from the recovery order.

---