alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
C bS IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

CLAUDIA D. DIPRINZIO

CIVIL ACTION
Plaintiff,
VS.
MBNA AMERICA BANK, N.A.,
NO. 04-872
Defendant
URY VERDICT FORM

We, the jury, unanimously answer the following questions:

Count I - Fair Credit Reporting Act

[4

FILED

SEP 1 5 2005

MICH,
By PF Kunz, Clerk
Dep. Clerk

For all questions under this Count, you may only consider the time period after defendant received
notice of the plaintiffs credit reporting disputes from Equifax and Experian on March 27, 2003.

1. Do you find that defendant, MBNA Bank, violated its duties under the Fair Credit Reporting Act?

Yes __” —ONo

(if yes, you must find for plaintiff on this Count and proceed to question number 2.
If no, you must find for defendant on this Count and proceed to question number 4.)

2. Was defendant's violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act willful?

Yes No

(Proceed to question number 3)

3. State the amount of actual damages you find that plaintiff, Claudia DiPrinzio, sustained as a result of
defendant’s negligent or willful violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act. (Note that if you find
that plaintiff sustained no actual damages, but you answered yes to both questions one and two, you

must award an amount between $100 and $1000).


10.

Taking 100% as the total fault causing plaintiff's damages, what percentage of the total do you
attribute to the negligence of:

Plaintiff

Defendant
(Proceed to question number 10)
Without regard to the percentages you listed above, what is the total amount of damages, if any,

sustained by plaintiff as a result of defendant’s negligence from the time period between June 2002
and March 2003?

Punitive Damages

i.

12.

If you answered “no” to both questions 2 and question 7, you must stop your deliberations at this
point and return to the Courtroom. If you answered “yes” to either question 2 or question 7, you
may, in your discretion using the considerations defined for you, award punitive damages to plaintiff
and against defendant. Do you find that plaintiff is entitled to an award of punitive damages against
the defendant?

Yes No

(If no, stop your deliberations and return to the Courtroom. If yes, proceed to
question number 12)

What is the amount of punitive damages you have decided to award to plaintiff and against
defendant?

$

(Your deliberations are now complete. Please return to the Courtroom)

ee,

Sury/Foreperson L/ x)
# C_2015118EN.01003902.xml

| 13.4.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 118/39 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.4.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 118/39

---

Action brought on 17 February 2015 — ROD Leichtmetallräder v OHIM — Rodi TR (ROD)

(Case T-75/15)

(2015/C 118/50)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ROD Leichtmetallräder GmbH (Weiden in der Oberpfalz, Germany) (represented by: J. Hellenbrand and J. Biener, lawyers)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Rodi TR, SL (Lleida, Spain)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word element ‘ROD’ — Community trade mark No 5 6 94  989

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

Procedure before OHIM

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 17 December 2014 in Case R 281/2014-5

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | Annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the contested decision;

| — | Annul the decision of OHIM’s Cancellation Division of 22 November 2013; |
| --- | --- |

—

Annul the decision of OHIM’s Cancellation Division of 22 November 2013;

| — | Order OHIM to pay the costs of the proceedings before the General Court as well as the costs of the proceedings before OHMI’s Board of Appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

Order OHIM to pay the costs of the proceedings before the General Court as well as the costs of the proceedings before OHMI’s Board of Appeal.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Infringement of Article 65(2) in connection with Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 65(2) in connection with Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of an essential procedural requirement — infringement of Rules 39(3) and 37(b)(ii) of Regulation No 2868/95. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of an essential procedural requirement — infringement of Rules 39(3) and 37(b)(ii) of Regulation No 2868/95.

---
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 214 (Tuesday, November 7, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 76837]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-24584]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

National Institutes of Health


National Cancer Institute; Notice of Meeting

    Pursuant to section 1009 of the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as 
amended, notice is hereby given of a meeting of the Frederick National 
Laboratory Advisory Committee to the National Cancer Institute.
    The meeting will be held virtually and is open to the public. 
Individuals who plan to view the virtual meeting and need special 
assistance or other reasonable accommodations to view the meeting, 
should notify the Contact Person listed below in advance of the 
meeting. The meeting will be videocast and can be accessed from the NIH 
Videocasting and Podcasting website (http://videocast.nih.gov).

    Name of Committee: Frederick National Laboratory Advisory 
Committee to the National Cancer Institute.
    Date: February 29, 2024.
    Time: 1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.
    Agenda: Ongoing and new activities at the Frederick National 
Laboratory for Cancer Research.
    Place: National Cancer Institute Shady Grove, 9609 Medical 
Center Drive, Rockville, MD 20850 (Virtual Meeting).
    Contact Person: Christopher D. Kane, Ph.D., Health Science 
Administrator and Program Officer, Office of Scientific Operations, 
NCI at Frederick, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of 
Health, 1050 Boyles Street, Building 427, Room 4, Frederick, 
Maryland 21702, <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#88ebe0fae1fbfce7f8e0edfaa6e3e9e6edc8e6e1e0a6efe7fe"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="513239233822253e213934237f3a303f34113f38397f363e27">[email protected]</span></a>.

    Any interested person may file written comments with the 
committee by forwarding the statement to the Contact Person listed 
on this notice. The statement should include the name, address, 
telephone number and when applicable, the business or professional 
affiliation of the interested person.
    Information is also available on the Institute's/Center's home 
page: FNLAC: https://deainfo.nci.nih.gov/advisory/fac/fac.htm, where 
an agenda and any additional information for the meeting will be 
posted when available.

(Catalogue of Federal Domestic Assistance Program Nos. 93.392, 
Cancer Construction; 93.393, Cancer Cause and Prevention Research; 
93.394, Cancer Detection and Diagnosis Research; 93.395, Cancer 
Treatment Research; 93.396, Cancer Biology Research; 93.397, Cancer 
Centers Support; 93.398, Cancer Research Manpower; 93.399, Cancer 
Control, National Institutes of Health, HHS)

    Dated: November 2, 2023.
Melanie J. Pantoja,
Program Analyst, Office of Federal Advisory Committee Policy.
[FR Doc. 2023-24584 Filed 11-6-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4140-01-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

The undersigned, Robert K. Weiler, Chief Executive Officer of Phase Forward Incorporated (the "Company"), in connection with the Company's Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2004 (the "Report"), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof, hereby certifies pursuant to the
requirements of 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that



This
certification is being provided pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 and is not to be deemed a part of the Report, nor is it to be deemed to be "filed" for any purpose whatsoever.

| |  | By: |  | /s/ROBERT K. WEILERRobert K. Weiler
Chief Executive Officer
Phase Forward Incorporated
Date: November 9, 2004
| |  | --- |  | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---



QuickLinks
Document Headings

                    Document headings vary by document type but may contain                    the following:                  
                -                       the agency or agencies that issued and signed a document                    
                -                       the number of the CFR title and the number of each part                      the document amends, proposes to amend, or is directly                      related to                    
                -                       the agency docket number / agency internal file number                    
                -                       the RIN which identifies each regulatory action listed in                      the Unified Agenda of Federal Regulatory and Deregulatory                      Actions                    

                    See the                                          Document Drafting Handbook                                        for more details.                  

###### Postal Service

# AGENCY:

                        Postal ServiceTM.                    

# ACTION:

Notice.

# SUMMARY:

The Postal Service gives notice of filing a request with the Postal Regulatory Commission to add a domestic shipping services contract to the list of Negotiated Service Agreements in the Mail Classification Schedule's Competitive Products List.

# DATES:

*Date of required notice:*                         November 9, 2023.                    

# FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Sean Robinson, 202-268-8405.

# SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

                    The United States Postal Service® hereby gives notice that, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3642 and 3632(b)(3), on November 3, 2023, it filed with the Postal Regulatory Commission a                     *USPS Request to Add Priority Mail & USPS Ground Advantage® Contract 96 to Competitive Product List.*                     Documents are available at                     *www.prc.gov,*                     Docket Nos. MC2024-40, CP2024-40.                

Sean Robinson,

Attorney, Corporate and Postal Business Law.

[FR Doc. 2023-24750 Filed 11-8-23; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 7710-12-P
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 06-6738

WILLIE LEE AMES, Petitioner - Appellant, versus GENE M. JOHNSON, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, Respondent - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:05-cv-00521-JCC) Submitted: August 24, 2006 Decided: August 31, 2006 Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Willie Lee Ames, Appellant Pro Se. Donald Eldridge Jeffrey, III, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).- 2 - PER CURIAM: Willie Lee Ames seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (2000) petition. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). A prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that any assessment of the constitutional claims by the district court is debatable or wrong and that any dispositive procedural ruling by the district court is likewise debatable. Miller-El v. Cockrell , 537 U.S. 322, 336-38 (2003); Slack v. McDaniel , 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); Rose v. Lee , 252 F.3d 676, 683-84 (4th Cir. 2001). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Ames has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

: CIVIL ACTION

ARIC McDOWELL

:

 v. :

: NO. 02-2760

CITY OF PHILADELPHIA POLICE

DEPARTMENT

PRETRIAL ORDER

AND NOW, this 30th day of July, 2003, it is ORDERED:

1. All discovery in this case is to be completed by 11/1/02.

2. Pretrial motions or motions for summary judgment are to be

filed within 15 days of the close of discovery.

3. This case will be placed in the trial pool(published in the

Legal Intelligencer) on 12/1/02.

4. Changes in the foregoing schedule may be obtained only by

written application to the Court, for cause shown.

5. Unless otherwise ordered, counsel need not submit a final

pretrial order. However, all exhibits must be marked and

exchanged, and all witness lists exchanged, at least three

working days in advance of trial. No objection to authenticity

of any exhibit will be entertained unless raised before trial.

6. If requested by counsel, the Court will hold a pretrial or

settlement conference at any time; but no such conference will

ordinarily be scheduled in the absence of a request. 

ATTEST: or BY THE COURT

BY: 

 Deputy Clerk CLIFFORD SCOTT GREEN, Sr. J.

Case 2:02-cv-02760-CG Document 4 Filed 07/30/2002 Page 1 of 1