76722 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 214 / Tuesday, November 7, 2023 / Notices 

1See Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from 

Spain: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2020–2022, 88 FR 29090 

(May 5, 2023) (Preliminary Results) and 

accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 

Commerce previously determined that Baux is a 

single entity comprised of the following two 

producers/exporters of subject merchandise: 

Compania Valenciana de Aluminio Baux, S.L.U. 

and Bancolor Baux S.L.U. (Bancolor). See Common 

Alloy Aluminum Sheet from Spain: Preliminary 

Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than 

Fair Value, Postponement of Final Determination, 

and Extension of Provisional Measures, 85 FR 

65367 (October 15, 2020), and accompanying 

Preliminary Decision Memorandum, unchanged in 

Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from Spain: Final 

Affirmative Determination of Sales at Less Than 

Fair Value, 86 FR 13298 (March 8, 2021) (Final 

Determination), and accompanying Issues and 

Decision Memorandum. 

2See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review, 2020–2022,’’ dated August 10, 2023. 

3See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the 

also become a matter of public record. 

Copies of this information collection 

assessment can be obtained from Gina 

Kouba, Office of Policy and Program 

Development, Food Safety and 

Inspection Service, USDA, 1400 

Independence Avenue SW, Mailstop 

3758, South Building, Washington, DC 

20250–3700; 202–720–5046. 

Comments are invited on: (a) whether 

the proposed collection of information 

is necessary for the proper performance 

of FSIS’ functions, including whether 

the information will have practical 

utility; (b) the accuracy of FSIS’ estimate 

of the burden of the proposed collection 

of information, including the validity of 

the method and assumptions used; (c) 

ways to enhance the quality, utility, and 

clarity of the information to be 

collected; and (d) ways to minimize the 

burden of the collection of information, 

including through the use of appropriate 

automated, electronic, mechanical, or 

other technological collection 

techniques, or other forms of 

information technology. Comments may 

be sent to both FSIS, at the addresses 

provided above, and the Desk Officer for 

Agriculture, Office of Information and 

Regulatory Affairs, Office of 

Management and Budget (OMB), 

Washington, DC 20253. 

Additional Public Notification 

Public awareness of all segments of 

rulemaking and policy development is 

important. Consequently, FSIS will 

announce this Federal Register 

publication on-line through the FSIS 

web page located at: https:// 

www.fsis.usda.gov/federal-register. 

FSIS will also announce and provide 

a link to this Federal Register 

publication through the FSIS 

Constituent Update, which is used to 

provide information regarding FSIS 

policies, procedures, regulations, 

Federal Register notices, FSIS public 

meetings, and other types of information 

that could affect or would be of interest 

to our constituents and stakeholders. 

The Constituent Update is available on 

the FSIS web page. Through the web 

page, FSIS can provide information to a 

much broader, more diverse audience. 

In addition, FSIS offers an email 

subscription service which provides 

automatic and customized access to 

selected food safety news and 

information. This service is available at: 

https://www.fsis.usda.gov/subscribe. 

Options range from recalls to export 

information, regulations, directives, and 

notices. Customers can add or delete 

subscriptions themselves and have the 

option to password protect their 

accounts. 

USDA Non-Discrimination Statement 

In accordance with Federal civil 

rights law and USDA civil rights 

regulations and policies, USDA, its 

Mission Areas, agencies, staff offices, 

employees, and institutions 

participating in or administering USDA 

programs are prohibited from 

discriminating based on race, color, 

national origin, religion, sex, gender 

identity (including gender expression), 

sexual orientation, disability, age, 

marital status, family/parental status, 

income derived from a public assistance 

program, political beliefs, or reprisal or 

retaliation for prior civil rights activity, 

in any program or activity conducted or 

funded by USDA (not all bases apply to 

all programs). Remedies and complaint 

filing deadlines vary by program or 

incident. 

Program information may be made 

available in languages other than 

English. Persons with disabilities who 

require alternative means of 

communication to obtain program 

information (e.g., Braille, large print, 

audiotape, American Sign Language) 

should contact the responsible Mission 

Area, agency, or staff office; the USDA 

TARGET Center at (202) 720–2600 

(voice and TTY); or the Federal Relay 

Service at (800) 877–8339. 

To file a program discrimination 

complaint, a complainant should 

complete a Form AD–3027, USDA 

Program Discrimination Complaint 

Form, which can be obtained online at 

https://www.usda.gov/forms/electronicforms, from any USDA office, by calling 

(866) 632–9992, or by writing a letter 

addressed to USDA. The letter must 

contain the complainant’s name, 

address, telephone number, and a 

written description of the alleged 

discriminatory action in sufficient detail 

to inform the Assistant Secretary for 

Civil Rights (ASCR) about the nature 

and date of an alleged civil rights 

violation. The completed AD–3027 form 

or letter must be submitted to USDA by: 

(1) Mail: U.S. Department of 

Agriculture, Office of the Assistant 

Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 

Independence Avenue SW, Washington, 

DC 20250–9410; 

(2) Fax: (833) 256–1665 or (202) 690– 

7442; or 

(3) Email: program.intake@usda.gov. 

USDA is an equal opportunity 

provider, employer, and lender. 

Paul Kiecker, 

Administrator. 

[FR Doc. 2023–24546 Filed 11–6–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3410–DM–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–469–820] 

Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet From 

Spain: Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review; 2020– 

2022 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) determines that 

common alloy aluminum sheet 

(aluminum sheet) from Spain was sold 

in the United States at less than normal 

value during the period of review (POR), 

October 15, 2020, through March 31, 

2022. 

DATES: Applicable November 7, 2023. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Colin Thrasher, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–3004. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On May 5, 2023, Commerce published 

the Preliminary Results covering one 

producer/exporter, Compania 

Valenciana de Aluminio Baux, S.L.U./ 

Bancolor Baux, S.L.U. (collectively, 

Baux).1 We invited interested parties to 

comment on the Preliminary Results. On 

August 10, 2023, Commerce extended 

the time period for issuing the final 

results of this review until November 1, 

2023.2 For a complete description of the 

events that occurred since the 

Preliminary Results, see the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum.3


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 214 / Tuesday, November 7, 2023 / Notices 76723 

Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty 

Order: Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from 

Spain; 2020–2022,’’ dated concurrently with and 

hereby adopted by this notice (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum). 

4See Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from 

Bahrain, Brazil, Croatia, Egypt, Germany, India, 

Indonesia, Italy, Oman, Romania, Serbia, Slovenia, 

South Africa, Spain, Taiwan and the Republic of 

Turkey: Antidumping Duty Orders, 86 FR 22139 

(April 27, 2021) (Order). 

5For a full discussion of this practice, see 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 

Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 

(May 6, 2003); see also Final Determination. 6See Final Determination. 

Commerce conducted this 

administrative review in accordance 

with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act). 

Scope of the Order 4

The products covered by this Order 

are common alloy aluminum sheet from 

Spain. For a full description of the 

scope, see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case and 

rebuttal briefs are addressed in the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum. A 

list of the issues that parties raised and 

to which we responded in the Issues 

and Decision Memorandum is attached 

to this notice as an appendix. The Issues 

and Decision Memorandum is a public 

document and is on file electronically 

via Enforcement and Compliance’s 

Antidumping and Countervailing Duty 

Centralized Electronic Service System 

(ACCESS). ACCESS is available to 

registered users at https://

access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete 

version of the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum can be accessed directly 

at https://access.trade.gov/public/ 

FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on a review of the record and 

comments received from interested 

parties, we have recalculated the 

weighted-average dumping margin for 

Baux. We have used updated sales 

databases and made certain additional 

changes as a result of verification in 

determining Baux’s dumping margin. 

For a more detailed discussion of these 

changes, see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. 

Final Results of Review 

Commerce determines that the 

following estimated weighted-average 

dumping margin exists for the period 

October 15, 2020, through March 31, 

2022: 

Exporter/producer 

Weightedaverage 

dumping 

margin 

(percent) 

Compania Valenciana de 

Aluminio Baux, S.L.U./ 

Bancolor Baux, S.L.U ........... 10.38 

Disclosure 

Commerce intends to disclose to 

interested parties the calculations 

performed in connection with the final 

results within five days of any public 

announcement or, if there is no public 

announcement, within five days of the 

date of publication of the notice of final 

determination in the Federal Register, 

in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). 

Assessment Rate 

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(A) of the 

Act, and 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), 

Commerce shall determine, and U.S. 

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) 

shall assess, antidumping duties on all 

appropriate entries covered by this 

review. 

Because Baux’s weighted-average 

dumping margin is not zero or de 

minimis (i.e., less than 0.5 percent), 

Commerce has calculated importerspecific antidumping duty assessment 

rates. We calculated importer-specific 

ad valorem assessment rates based on 

the ratio of the total amount of dumping 

calculated for the examined sales to the 

total entered value of the sales. Where 

an importer-specific assessment rate is 

zero or de minimis, we will instruct CBP 

to liquidate the appropriate entries 

without regard to antidumping duties. 

For entries of subject merchandise 

during the POR produced by Baux for 

which it did not know its merchandise 

was destined for the United States, we 

will instruct CBP to liquidate 

unreviewed entries at the all-others rate 

established in the original less-than-fair 

value (LTFV) investigation of 3.80 

percent if there is no rate for the 

intermediate company(ies) involved in 

the transaction.5

We intend to instruct CBP to take into 

account the ‘‘provisional measures 

deposit cap,’’ in accordance with 19 

CFR 351.212(d). 

Commerce intends to issue 

assessment instructions to CBP no 

earlier than 35 days after the date of 

publication of the final results of this 

review in the Federal Register. If a 

timely summons is filed at the U.S. 

Court of International Trade, the 

assessment instructions will direct CBP 

not to liquidate relevant entries until the 

time for parties to file a request for a 

statutory injunction has expired (i.e., 

within 90 days of publication). 

Cash Deposit Requirements 

The following cash deposit 

requirements will be effective for all 

shipments of the subject merchandise 

entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, 

for consumption on or after the 

publication date of the final results of 

this administrative review, as provided 

by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) the 

cash deposit rate for Baux will be the 

rate established in the final results of 

this administrative review; (2) for 

merchandise exported by producers or 

exporters not covered in this 

administrative review but covered in a 

prior segment of the proceeding, the 

cash deposit rate will continue to be the 

company-specific rate published for the 

most recently completed segment of this 

proceeding; (3) if the exporter is not a 

firm covered in this review, a prior 

review, or the LTFV investigation, but 

the producer is, the cash deposit rate 

will be the rate established for the most 

recently completed segment of this 

proceeding for the producer of the 

subject merchandise; and (4) the cash 

deposit rate for all other manufacturers 

or exporters will continue to be 3.80 

percent, the all-others rate established 

in the LTFV investigation.6 These cash 

deposit requirements, when imposed, 

shall remain in effect until further 

notice. 

Notification to Importers 

This notice serves as a final reminder 

to importers of their responsibility 

under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a 

certificate regarding the reimbursement 

of antidumping duties prior to 

liquidation of the relevant entries 

during this POR. Failure to comply with 

this requirement could result in 

Commerce’s presumption that 

reimbursement of antidumping duties 

has occurred and the subsequent 

assessment of double antidumping 

duties. 

Administrative Protective Order 

This notice also serves as a final 

reminder to parties subject to 

administrative protective order (APO) of 

their responsibility concerning the 

return or destruction of proprietary 

information disclosed under APO in 

accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3), 

which continues to govern business 

proprietary information in this segment 

of the proceeding. Timely written 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
76724 Federal Register / Vol. 88, No. 214 / Tuesday, November 7, 2023 / Notices 

1See Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from India: 

Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty 

Administrative Review; 2020–2022, 88 FR 29082 

(May 5, 2023) (Preliminary Results), and 

accompanying Preliminary Decision Memorandum. 2See Initiation of Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Administrative Reviews, 87 FR 

35165 (June 9, 2022). 3See Memorandum, ‘‘Respondent Selection,’’ 

dated July 1, 2022. 4See Memorandum, ‘‘Extension of Deadline for 

Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative 

Review, 2020–2022,’’ dated August 16, 2023. 5See Memorandum, ‘‘Issues and Decision 

Memorandum for the Final Results of the 

Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty 

Order: Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from India; 

2020–2022,’’ dated concurrently with and hereby 

adopted by this notice (Issues and Decision 

Memorandum). 

6See Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet from 

Bahrain, Brazil, Croatia, Egypt, Germany, India, 

Indonesia, Italy, Oman, Romania, Serbia, Slovenia, 

South Africa, Spain, Taiwan and the Republic of 

Turkey: Antidumping Duty Orders, 86 FR 22139 

(April 27, 2021) (Order). 

notification of the return/destruction of 

APO materials, or conversion to judicial 

protective order, is hereby requested. 

Failure to comply with the regulations 

and the terms of an APO is a 

sanctionable violation. 

Notification to Interested Parties 

We are issuing and publishing this 

notice in accordance with sections 

751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 

CFR 351.221(b)(5) and 19 CFR 

351.213(h)(1). 

Dated: November 1, 2023. 

Lisa W. Wang, 

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and 

Compliance. 

Appendix 

List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum 

I. Summary 

II. Background 

III. Scope of the Order 

IV. Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

V. Discussion of the Issues 

Comment 1: Whether Commerce Should 

Grant Baux a Level of Trade Adjustment 

Comment 2: Whether Commerce Should 

Use Baux’s Updated Databases 

VI. Recommendation 

[FR Doc. 2023–24598 Filed 11–6–23; 8:45 am] 

BILLING CODE 3510–DS–P 

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE 

International Trade Administration 

[A–533–895] 

Common Alloy Aluminum Sheet From 

India: Final Results of Antidumping 

Duty Administrative Review; 2020– 

2022 

AGENCY: Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

Department of Commerce. 

SUMMARY: The U.S. Department of 

Commerce (Commerce) determines that 

common alloy aluminum sheet 

(aluminum sheet) from India was not 

sold in the United States at less than 

normal value during the period of 

review (POR), October 15, 2020, through 

March 31, 2022. 

DATES: Applicable November 7, 2023. 

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: 

Rachel Jennings, AD/CVD Operations, 

Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, 

International Trade Administration, 

U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 

Constitution Avenue NW, Washington 

DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–1110. 

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: 

Background 

On May 5, 2023, Commerce published 

the Preliminary Results of this 

administrative review and invited 

parties to comment on the Preliminary 

Results.1 This administrative review 

covers two producers/exporters of 

aluminum sheet from India.2 Commerce 

selected one respondent for individual 

examination, Hindalco Industries 

Limited (Hindalco).3 On August 16, 

2023, Commerce extended the time 

period for issuing the final results of 

this review until November 1, 2023.4

For a complete description of the events 

that occurred since the Preliminary 

Results, see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum.5

Commerce conducted this 

administrative review in accordance 

with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 

1930, as amended (the Act). 

Scope of the Order 6

The products covered by this Order 

are common alloy aluminum sheet from 

India. For a full description of the 

scope, see the Issues and Decision 

Memorandum. 

Analysis of Comments Received 

All issues raised in the case and 

rebuttal briefs are addressed in the 

Issues and Decision Memorandum. A 

list of the issues that parties raised and 

to which we responded in the Issues 

and Decision Memorandum is attached 

to this notice as an appendix to this 

notice. The Issues and Decision 

Memorandum is a public document and 

is on file electronically via Enforcement 

and Compliance’s Antidumping and 

Countervailing Duty Centralized 

Electronic Service System (ACCESS). 

ACCESS is available to registered users 

at https://access.trade.gov. In addition, a 

complete version of the Issues and 

Decision Memorandum can be accessed 

directly at https://access.trade.gov/ 

public/FRNoticesListLayout.aspx. 

Changes Since the Preliminary Results 

Based on a review of the record and 

comments received from interested 

parties, we made certain changes to the 

margin calculation for these final 

results. However, those adjustments did 

not result in any changes to the 

estimated weighted-average dumping 

margin for Hindalco. For a more 

detailed discussion of these changes, see 

the Issues and Decision Memorandum. 

Rate for Non-Examined Companies 

The Act and Commerce’s regulations 

do not address the establishment of a 

rate to be applied to companies not 

selected for examination when 

Commerce limits its examination in an 

administrative review pursuant to 

section 777A(c)(2) of the Act. Generally, 

Commerce looks to section 735(c)(5) of 

the Act, which provides instructions for 

calculating the all-others rate in a 

market economy investigation, for 

guidance when calculating the rate for 

companies which were not selected for 

individual examination in an 

administrative review. Under section 

735(c)(5)(A) of the Act, the all-others 

rate is normally ‘‘an amount equal to the 

weighted average of the estimated 

weighted-average dumping margins 

established for exporters and producers 

individually investigated, excluding any 

zero and de minimis margins, and any 

margins determined entirely {on the 

basis of facts available}.’’ 

Where the dumping margin for 

individually examined respondents are 

all zero, de minimis, or based entirely 

on facts available, section 735(c)(5)(B) of 

the Act provides that Commerce may 

use ‘‘any reasonable method to establish 

the estimated all-others rate for 

exporters and producers not 

individually investigated, including 

averaging the estimated weighted 

average dumping margins determined 

for the exporters and producers 

individually investigated.’’ 

In this review, we calculated a 

weighted-average dumping margin for 

Hindalco that is zero and we did not 

calculate any margins which are not 

zero, de minimis, determined entirely 

on the basis of facts available. Therefore, 

consistent with section 735(c)(5)(B) of 

the Act, we are applying to Virgo 

Aluminum Limited, the company not 

selected for individual examination in 

this review, a margin of zero percent. 

Final Results of Review 

Commerce determines that the 

following estimated weighted-average 

dumping margins exist for the period 

October 15, 2020, through March 31, 

2022: 


khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES