alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Document

Exhibit 10.14


TRINITY INDUSTRIES, INC.
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
Summary Sheet as of December 10, 2020


On December 10, 2020, the Board of Directors approved the following compensation for non-employee directors, effective in 2021:


•Board member annual retainer – $70,000 
•Annual equity compensation – $130,000, using a date of grant share price as the basis for awards, with a minimum vesting period of one year
•Independent Chairman of the Board – annual retainer of $125,000, to be paid in cash and/or equity, as selected by the Chair 
•Chairs of the Audit Committee and Human Resources Committee – annual retainer of $20,000
•Chairs of Corporate Governance and Risk Committee and Finance and Risk Committee – annual retainer of $15,000
•Board meeting fee – $2,000 for each meeting attended 
•Committee members – $2,000 for each meeting attended
•Ad hoc or special assignment work performed for or at the request of the Chairman or Chief Executive Officer and President – $2,000 per day
# 		Sorry, something went wrong

An unexpected error has occurred.Web Parts Maintenance Page: If you have permission, you can use this page to temporarily close Web Parts or remove personal settings. For more information, contact your site administrator.

Technical Details

Troubleshoot issues with Microsoft SharePoint Foundation.

Correlation ID: 37a523a1-a4c4-a055-6128-0b9a0dc7b49f

Date and Time: 4/29/2024 12:39:32 AM

----

Go back to site
Case No;.9,680)

#### The M. M. CALEB.

[4 Ben. 15.] 1

District Court, E. D. New York.

Jan., 1870.

Damages — Maritime Tort — Tow-boat and Tow.

1. Where a tug was employed to take a schooner out of a slip from alongside another vessel, and the men on the schooner gave no directions as to the mode or time of taking her out, and, in taking her out, her. stay caught the. yard-arm of the other vessel, and her topmast was carried away: *Held,*that the tug was bound to adopt a method of taking the Bchooner out without injury.

2. The method selected was manifestly hazardous, and the tug was liable for the damages occasioned by her want of -success.

[Cited in The Merrimac,: Case No. 9,478.]

In admiralty.

1

 [Reported by Robert D. Benedict, Esq., and here reprinted by permission.]

BENEDICT, District Judge.

This action is brought to recover "the damages caused to *548the schooner Edward Reed,by reason of her topmast rigging catching the yard-arm of the steamer England, while she was being towed from alongside that steamer by the steam tug M. M. Caleb.

The steamer was lying upon the north side of pier 47, nearly up to the bulkhead, and the schooner was lying alongside, bow in, and nearly up to an elevator which was lying at the bulkhead.

The wind was blowing heavily from the N. W., the tide was ebb, and slack in the slip. The tug, as it appears, undertook to transport the schooner from the position above described to a position on the lower side of the pier, and for that purpose made fast a line to the schooner’s bow, which was carried aft on the schooner, and held by a slip at the larboard quarter. The tug then started the schooner astern by the hawser, 'but as the schooner moved aft, her stay caught in the yardarm of the steamer, and, before she could be stopped, the topmast was carried away and other damage done to the rigging.

The evidence does not show that any action of the schooner contributed to the accident; the men on board of her gave no directions as to the mode of fastening or as to the mode or time of taking the schooner out. All this was determined on by those on the tug, who saw the position of the schooner, and were bound to select a method of taking her from the side of the steamer without injury.

The method selected of taking her out by a stem line was manifestly attended with risk of carrying away the masts, if the schooner swung at all, as she was quite certain to do under the action of the tug.

Having adopted a hazardous method of performing the duty, the tug must be held responsible for the damages arising from the failure of success. Proper care on her part, would, in my opinion, have enabled her to remove the schooner in safety, heavy as the wind was. ,

Let the decree be for the libellants, with a reference to ascertain the amount.
WARNING: THE EDGAR SYSTEM ENCOUNTERED ERROR(S) WHILE PROCESSING THIS SCHEDULE.

<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>       6
<SERIES>
   <NUMBER> 5
   <NAME> BELAIR CAPITAL FUND


<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                              6-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               JUN-30-1999
<INVESTMENTS-AT-COST>                      2,318,848,596
<INVESTMENTS-AT-VALUE>                     2,697,580,106
<RECEIVABLES>                              17,010,084
<ASSETS-OTHER>                             526,935
<OTHER-ITEMS-ASSETS>                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                             2,715,117,125
<PAYABLE-FOR-SECURITIES>                   0
<SENIOR-LONG-TERM-DEBT>                    0
<OTHER-ITEMS-LIABILITIES>                  631,074,438
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES>                        631,074,438
<SENIOR-EQUITY>                            0
<PAID-IN-CAPITAL-COMMON>                   1,752,925,594
<SHARES-COMMON-STOCK>                      16,346,353
<SHARES-COMMON-PRIOR>                      16,568,833
<ACCUMULATED-NII-CURRENT>                  (618,924)
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-NII>                     0
<ACCUMULATED-NET-GAINS>                    (56,935,785)
<OVERDISTRIBUTION-GAINS>                   0
<ACCUM-APPREC-OR-DEPREC>                   388,671,802
<NET-ASSETS>                               2,084,042,687
<DIVIDEND-INCOME>                          33,014,633
<INTEREST-INCOME>                          2,585,098
<OTHER-INCOME>                             0
<EXPENSES-NET>                             30,915,467
<NET-INVESTMENT-INCOME>                    4,684,264
<REALIZED-GAINS-CURRENT>                   (1,847,633)
<APPREC-INCREASE-CURRENT>                  175,311,607
<NET-CHANGE-FROM-OPS>                      178,148,238
<EQUALIZATION>                             0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-INCOME>                  0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OF-GAINS>                   0
<DISTRIBUTIONS-OTHER>                      0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-SOLD>                    0
<NUMBER-OF-SHARES-REDEEMED>                222,480
<SHARES-REINVESTED>                        0
<NET-CHANGE-IN-ASSETS>                     151,194,315
<ACCUMULATED-NII-PRIOR>                    0
<ACCUMULATED-GAINS-PRIOR>                  (55,088,152)
<OVERDISTRIB-NII-PRIOR>                    (5,303,188)
<OVERDIST-NET-GAINS-PRIOR>                 0
<GROSS-ADVISORY-FEES>                      3,174,777
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                         20,403,471
<GROSS-EXPENSE>                            30,915,467
<AVERAGE-NET-ASSETS>                       2,007,493,950
<PER-SHARE-NAV-BEGIN>                      116.66
<PER-SHARE-NII>                            0.285
<PER-SHARE-GAIN-APPREC>                    10.545
<PER-SHARE-DIVIDEND>                       0
<PER-SHARE-DISTRIBUTIONS>                  0
<RETURNS-OF-CAPITAL>                       0
<PER-SHARE-NAV-END>                        127.49
<EXPENSE-RATIO>                            3.11
[AVG-DEBT-OUTSTANDING]                     0
[AVG-DEBT-PER-SHARE]                       0


</TABLE>
H. Res. 814 

In the House of Representatives, U. S., 

April 11, 2018. 

Resolved, That the following named Member be, and is 

hereby, elected to the following standing committee of the 

House of Representatives: 

COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY: Mr. Rothfus. 

Attest: 

Clerk.
## Blumberg & Bagley, L.L.P.
Attorneys
2304 West Interstate 20, Suite 190 Arlington, Texas 7601 7 www.blumbergbagley.com

Peter F. Bagley (817) 277

- 1500

Board Certified, Consumer and Commercial Law, Texas Board of Legal Specialization Facsimile (817) 277

- 1170

Fellow, College of the State Bar of Texas

June 12, 2015

Clerk, Third Court Of Appeals

P. O. Box 12547 Austin, Texas 78711

R e: 03-14-00430- CV;

Alexander Fedorov v. Cecilia Cavuto

Dear Clerk :

Please take notice that I will be on vacation from Wednesday, August 12, 2015 through Monday, August 17; and from Thursday, December 10, 2015 through Wednesday, December 23, 2015. By copy of this letter, I am notifying all other counsel of the same and requesting that no

matters be schedul ed or set during those time periods.

If you have any questions about this, please do not hesitate to contact me at the address or telephone numbers set above.

Yours sincerely,

/s/ Peter F . Bagley

Peter F. Bagley

PFB/ jmp

cc: Alexander Fedorov

cc : Mr. Jimmy Vaught

V AUGHT L AW F IRM

, P.C. 5929 Balcones Drive, Ste. 201 Austin, Texas 78731 ACCEPTED
03-14-00430-CV

5660261
THIRD COURT OF APPEALS

AUSTIN, TEXAS
6/12/2015 2:51:41 PM
JEFFREY D. KYLE

CLERK
Case 2:03-cv-05020-EL Document 72 Filed 09/23/04 Page 1 of 15
Case 2:03-cv-05020-EL Document 72 Filed 09/23/04 Page 2 of 15
Case 2:03-cv-05020-EL Document 72 Filed 09/23/04 Page 3 of 15
Case 2:03-cv-05020-EL Document 72 Filed 09/23/04 Page 4 of 15
Case 2:03-cv-05020-EL Document 72 Filed 09/23/04 Page 5 of 15
Case 2:03-cv-05020-EL Document 72 Filed 09/23/04 Page 6 of 15
Case 2:03-cv-05020-EL Document 72 Filed 09/23/04 Page 7 of 15
Case 2:03-cv-05020-EL Document 72 Filed 09/23/04 Page 8 of 15
Case 2:03-cv-05020-EL Document 72 Filed 09/23/04 Page 9 of 15
Case 2:03-cv-05020-EL Document 72 Filed 09/23/04 Page 10 of 15
Case 2:03-cv-05020-EL Document 72 Filed 09/23/04 Page 11 of 15
Case 2:03-cv-05020-EL Document 72 Filed 09/23/04 Page 12 of 15
Case 2:03-cv-05020-EL Document 72 Filed 09/23/04 Page 13 of 15
Case 2:03-cv-05020-EL Document 72 Filed 09/23/04 Page 14 of 15
Case 2:03-cv-05020-EL Document 72 Filed 09/23/04 Page 15 of 15
Exhibit 23.1

CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 333-159672, 333-164308 and
333-171770 on Form S-8 of our reports dated March 9, 2011, relating to the financial statements of OpenTable, Inc. and subsidiaries (collectively the
"Company"), and the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting, appearing in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended
December 31, 2010.

/s/
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

San
Jose, California

March 9,
2011

---



QuickLinks
No. 57160.

protests 793647-G, etc. (New York).

#### Draeger Shipping Co. and China Man Way Fur Corpn. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Oliver, C. J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the kidskin plates are similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Kung Chen Fur Corpn.*v. *United States*(29 Cust. Ct. 266, C. D. 1480), the claim for free entry under paragraph 1681 was sustained.

Ford, J., concurred.

Mollison, J., dissented for the reasons set forth in his dissenting opinion in C. D. 1480, *supra.*
No. 55140.

#### Jackson Watch Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 111443-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

It was stipulated that the items of merchandise marked “A” or “B” on the invoices consist of watch movements similar in all material respects to those which were the subject of *United States*v. *Helbros Watch Co. et al.*(38 C. C. P. A. 1, C. A. D. 430). Upon the agreed statement of facts ■and the cited authority, the items marked “A” were held properly dutiable at the base rate of 90 cents each as watch movements more than 1 inch but less than 1.77 inches wide, and the items marked “B” were held dutiable at $1.20 each as' watch movements more than *%0*of 1 inch but not more than 1 inch wide under paragraph 367 (a) (1), as modified, *supra.*
United States Court of Appeals

For the Eighth Circuit

___________________________

No. 18-1007

___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Gregory Swecker, also known as Gregory R. Swecker, also known as Greg

Swecker; Beverly Swecker, also known as Beverly F. Swecker

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellants

Swecks, Inc.; Palisades Collection, LLC; State of Iowa, by serving Greene County

Attorney and Attorney General for the State of Iowa; Grand Junction Municipal;

Unifund CCR Partners; Midland Power Cooperative; State of Iowa, Greene

County Attorney

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants

____________

Appeal from United States District Court 

for the Southern District of Iowa - Des Moines

____________

Submitted: November 15, 2018

Filed: November 20, 2018

[Unpublished]

____________

Before BENTON, BOWMAN, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges.

____________
PER CURIAM.

GregorySwecker and BeverlySwecker appeal after the district court adversely

1

granted summary judgment in a foreclosure action brought by the United States of

America, and denied their Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion challenging

the summary judgment decision. The Sweckers have also filed two motions, both

asking this court to take judicial notice of documents related to a separate matter.

We first conclude that our jurisdiction is limited to reviewing the district

court’s order denying the Sweckers’ Rule 60(b) motion. See Fed. R. App. P.

3(c)(1)(B) (notice of appeal must designate judgment, order, or part thereof being

appealed); USCOC of Greater Mo. v. City of Ferguson, 583 F.3d 1035, 1040 & n.4

(8th Cir. 2009) (discussing application of Rule 3(c)). We further conclude that the

district court did not abuse its discretion in denying that motion, as the Sweckers did

not show with clear and convincing evidence that the government had engaged in

fraud ormisrepresentation preventing themfromfullyand fairly presenting their case,

and did not show exceptional circumstances warranting relief. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 60

(describing circumstances under which court may relieve party from final judgment

or order); Browder v. Dir., Dept. of Corr. of Ill., 434 U.S. 257, 263 n.7 (U.S. 1978) 

(Rule 60(b) ruling is reviewed for abuse of discretion); Arnold v. Wood, 238 F.3d

992, 998 (8th Cir. 2001) (Rule 60(b) motion is not vehicle for simple reargument on

merits, but instead requiresshowing of exceptional circumstances warranting relief);

see also United States v. Metro. St. Louis Sewer Dist., 440 F.3d 930, 935 (8th Cir.

2006) (to prevail on Rule 60(b)(3) motion, movant must show with clear and

convincing evidence that opposing party engaged in fraud or misrepresentation that

prevented movant from fully and fairly presenting movant’s case).

The Honorable Robert W. Pratt, United States District Judge for the Southern 1

District of Iowa.

-2-
Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny the Sweckers’

pending motions, as the documents at issue would not be helpful to our review.

 ____________________

 

 

 

-3-
No. 56310.

protests 168254-K, etc. (New York).

#### Accurate Millinery Co. et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

Following the authorities cited in Abstract 15400 the court dismissed the protests.
Before the Third Division,

February 11, 1948

No. 52174.

protest 117764-K (San Francisco).

#### Schenley Import Corp. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that the merchandise and issues herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Somerset*(33 C. C. P. A. 138, C. A. D. 328), and that a quantity of liquor amounting to 10 percent or more of the total contents of the various barrels, casks, packages, etc., was lost in transit from the port of exportation to the port of destination due to breakage, leakage, or damage. In accordance therewith it was held that an allowance should have been made for the loss appearing upon the gauger’s return as verified by the affidavit of the importer. The protest was sustained to this extent.
PLAINTIFF

VS.

DEFENDANT

CIVIL ACTION NO.

DOCUMENT FILED UNDER SEAL

Case 2:03-cv-06604-JP Document 458 Filed 08/18/10 Page 1 of 1
No. 64759.

#### A. V. Olsson Trading Co. *v.*United States,

protests 60/2130 and 59/31563 (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of bread similar in all material respects to that the subject of *United States*v. *Nordic Baking & Importing Co., Inc.*(47 C.C.P.A. 78, C.A.D. 733), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
---

|CERTIFICATION OF                                         
|---------------------------------------------------------
|CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND CHIEF FINANCIAL
      OFFICER
|PURSUANT TO                                              
|18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,                                  
|AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO                                   
|SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002            

I, G.W. Norman Wareham, Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer of Normark Ventures Corp. (the Company), hereby certify
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge:

| | (i)  | the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of the Company, for the
      fiscal year ended April 30, 2004, and to which this certification is
      attached as Exhibit 32.1 (the Report) fully complies with the
      requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
      1934, as amended; and
| | ---- | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |      |                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     
| | (ii) | the information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
      operations of the Company.                                                                                                                                                    

| | By:    | /s/ G.W. Norman Wareham                        
| | ------ | -----------------------------------------------
| | Name:  | G.W. NORMAN WAREHAM                            
| | Title: | President, Treasurer, Principal
      Executive
| |        | Officer and Principal Accounting
      Officer 
| | Date:  | June 28, 2007                                  

A signed original of this written statement required by
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 has been provided to the
Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

This certification accompanies the Form 10-KSB to which it
relates, is not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is
not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Registrant under the
Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (whether made
before or after the date of the Form 10-KSB), irrespective of any general
incorporation language contained in such filing.

---
(770) 451-0313 

FAX (770) 451-0317 

Federal Aviation Administration 

600 Independence A venue, SW 

Wilbur Wright Building 

Suite 2W1000 

Washington, DC 20591 

ALAN ARMSTRONG 

ATTORNEY AT LAW 

2900 CHAMBLEE-TUCKER ROAD 

BUILDING 5. SUITE 350 ·, 

ATLANTA. GEORGIA 30341 

July 18, 2012 

In re: In the Matter of Monroe Air Center, LLC 

FAA Case No. 2011 SW030084 

FF A CP Case No. ____ ; Judge Not Assigned 

): I l 

alan'@alanarmstronglaw.com 

www.alanarmstronglaw.com 

Via Federal Express 

Dear Sir or Madam: r~ntS d-O~~Drt75" 

Enclosed please find an original and one copy of the following documents to be filed in the above 

referenced matter: 

1. Answer of Monroe Air Center, LLC; 

2. Respondent's Motion to Dismiss Complaint; 

3. Affidavit of Judy Fuller; and 

4. Affidavit of Palmer Jarrell. 

Please file the original pleadings, date-stamp the extra copies ofthe pleading and return them to 

the undersigned in the enclosed postage prepaid, self-addressed envelope. 

Thank you for your attention to this matter. 

AA/kjw 

Enclosures 

Cc: Tim Duff, Esq. 

Office of the Regional Counsel 

Federal Aviation Administration 

2601 Meacham Blvd., Room 663 

Ft. Worth, TX 76137 

Fax: 817-222-5945 

Email: tim.duff@faa.gov 

Palmer Jarrell, Monroe Air Center 

Best regards, 

Ad~n~M~ 

~ 

1
**MEMORANDUM**
 
 **December
        2, 2005**
 
 
 **To:**
              Mark
                  Josipovich
                The
                    Bluebook International
                  21098
                    Bake Parkway, Suite 100
                  Lake
                    Forest, CA 92630
  **From:**
              Bathgate
                  Capital Partners
                5350
                    S. Roslyn Street, Suite 400
                  Greenwood
                    Village, CO 80111-1163
  **Re:**
              **$50,000
                  loan from Mrs. Susan K. Huebner & Mrs. Margaret M.
                  Bathgate**
 
 Per
        our
        discussions on the phone and due to the urgency of Bluebook’s capital
        requirements, these two loans of $25,000 each, totaling $50,000, are being
        wired
        today. Terms and conditions for the money lent, as well as any other
        consideration, will be determined at a later date to the mutual agreement
        of
        both parties.
 
 Until
        such time as final agreements are executed, notes shall bear interest at
        12% per
        annum and shall be payable upon thirty days notice in writing.
 
 
 Sincerely,/s/ Margaret
                M. Bathgate
              /s/ Vicki BaroneMargaret
                  M. Bathgate
              Vicki
                  Barone
                Senior
                  Managing Partner
    
 5350
        South
        Roslyn Street, Suite 400 Greenwood Village, CO 80111-2124
 Phone:
        303.694.0862 Fax: 303.694.6287
EXHIBIT10.44**Summary of 2007 Bonus Award Program**The bonus award program provides that the Company must meet at least 50% of its overall corporategoals for the year (as determined by our Board of Directors) for any bonus compensation to be paidand that executive officers and employees must be rated as an “Achieves expected levels ofperformance” or higher in their annual performance review in order to be eligible for a bonuspayout. The ratings and bonus opportunity as a percentage of base salary for the executiveofficers are listed in the table below.                 **Achieves** **Exceeds** **Consistently** **Significantly**  **Expected** **Expected** **Exceeds** **Exceeds**  **Levels of** **Levels of** **Expected Levels** **Expected Levels****Performance Ratings** **Performance** **Performance** **of Performance** **of Performance** VP (Executive Officer),Chief Financial Officer 20%  25%  30%  35%               Chief Scientific Officer 25%  30%  35%  40%               Chief Executive Officer 30%  35%  45%  50%For the 2007 bonus plan, our Board of Directors has established certain strategic andfinancial objectives for the Company, directed at progressing certain of our kinase inhibitorresearch programs towards clinical development, entering into a significant strategic transactionand achieving specific financial objectives. The goals for bonuses have been established so thattarget attainment is not assured and attainment will require a high level of persistence, effortand execution on the part of our executive officers. Even if the requisite strategic and financialobjectives are satisfied, our Compensation Committee has full discretion to determine the actualamount, if any, of the bonus awarded to any individual under our bonus award program.
4