alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
EXHIBIT 31.1


                               INFICON Holding AG
                 Sarbanes-Oxley Act Section 302(a) Certification


I, Lukas Winkler, certify that:

      1.    I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 20-F of INFICON Holding
            AG;

      2.    Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
            statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
            necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
            under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect
            to the period covered by this report;

      3.    Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
            information included in this report, fairly present in all material
            respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash
            flows of the company as of, and for, the periods presented in this
            report;

      4.    The company's other certifying officer and I are responsible for
            establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
            defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the company and
            have:

            a)    designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused
                  such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under
                  our supervision, to ensure that material information relating
                  to the company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is
                  made known to us by others within those entities, particularly
                  during the period in which this report is being prepared;

            b)    evaluated the effectiveness of the company's disclosure
                  controls and procedures and presented in this report our
                  conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls
                  and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this
                  report based on such evaluation.

Date: March 14, 2005

/s/ Lukas Winkler

Lukas Winkler
Chief Executive Officer and President
Case 2:04-cv-00938-JG Document 8 Filed 05/28/2004 Page 1 of 4

MARY DOE v. MATCH.COM, INC. et al Doc. 8

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:04-cv-00938-JG Document 8 Filed 05/28/2004 Page 2 of 4
Case 2:04-cv-00938-JG Document 8 Filed 05/28/2004 Page 3 of 4
Case 2:04-cv-00938-JG Document 8 Filed 05/28/2004 Page 4 of 4
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<PAGE>
<ARTICLE>  9
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   9-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          DEC-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JAN-01-1999
<PERIOD-END>                               SEP-30-1999
<CASH>                                             458
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>                           5,504
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                                   830
<TRADING-ASSETS>                                     0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>                      5,424
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>                               0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>                                 0
<LOANS>                                         19,106
<ALLOWANCE>                                         30
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                  32,646
<DEPOSITS>                                      21,586
<SHORT-TERM>                                         0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>                                117
<LONG-TERM>                                          0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                           805
<OTHER-SE>                                       7,320
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>                  29,828
<INTEREST-LOAN>                                  1,064
<INTEREST-INVEST>                                  180
<INTEREST-OTHER>                                   330
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                                 1,574
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>                                 748
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                 748
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>                              826
<LOAN-LOSSES>                                        0
<SECURITIES-GAINS>                                   0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                                    634
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                    201
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>                           0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       136
<EPS-BASIC>                                       0.18
<EPS-DILUTED>                                     0.18
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                                    3.53
<LOANS-NON>                                          0
<LOANS-PAST>                                         0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                                     0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                                      0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                                    30
<CHARGE-OFFS>                                        0
<RECOVERIES>                                         0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>                                   30
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>                                30
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>                                  0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>                              0


</TABLE>
Thank you for your interest in aviation safety.

FAA Office of Rulemaking

From: gus@airspaceconsulting.com [gus@airspaceconsulting.com]

Sent: Monday, August 03, 2015 12:21 PM

To: 9-AWA-AVS-333Exemptions (FAA)

Subject: Confidential Aircraft Flight Manuals/Amendment to Petition 

#11815

Dear FAA,

Please find the following two (2) proprietary manuals in support of the Amendment Request for the F

1) Aircraft Flight Manual - DJI Phantom 3

2) Aircraft Flight Manual - Action Drone AD-2

Thank you for your attention to Amendment request for the Enviroskycam Grant of Exemption.

Best regards,

Gus Calderon

760-519-1941

www.airspaceconsulting.com
EXHIBIT 6  CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002  In connection with the annual report of
Enerplus Resources Fund (the Fund) on Form 40-F for the period ended December
31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date
hereof (the Report), I Gordon J. Kerr, President and Chief Executive Officer
of EnerMark Inc., on behalf of the Fund, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that:  (1)           The
Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and  (2)           The
information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects,
the financial condition and results of operations of the Fund.  /s/ GORDON
  J. KERRGordon J.
  KerrPresident
  and Chief Executive Officerof EnerMark
  Inc.  May 16, 2003
Exhibit 32.2


CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,


AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of GSI Technology, Inc. (the "Company") on Form 10-K for the year ending March 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Douglas M. Schirle, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:


|    |                                                                                                                                                
|--- | -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(1) | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)); and

|    |                                                                                                                                                     
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|(2) | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

June 2, 2011/s/ DOUGLAS M. SCHIRLEDouglas M. SchirleChief Financial Officer


A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to the Registrant and will be retained by the Registrant and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
# C_2015262EN.01003401.xml

| 10.8.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 262/34 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

10.8.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 262/34

---

Action brought on 26 May 2015 — Zhang v OHIM — K & L Ruppert Stiftung (Anna Smith)

(Case T-295/15)

(2015/C 262/45)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Yongyu Zhang (Manchester, United Kingdom) (represented by: M. Steinert, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: K & L Ruppert Stiftung & Co. Handels-KG (Weilheim, Germany)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Applicant: Yongyu Zhang

Applicant:

Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘Anna Smith’ — Registration No 11 981 446

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Opposition proceedings

Procedure before OHIM

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 27 February 2015 in Case R 1559/2014-5

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | admit, after annulment of the contested decision relating to opposition proceedings No B 2 264 227 on the application for registration No 11 981 446 of 12 July 2013, the word mark Anna Smith as a Community trade mark for Classes 18 and 25, as per the application. |
| --- | --- |

—

admit, after annulment of the contested decision relating to opposition proceedings No B 2 264 227 on the application for registration No 11 981 446 of 12 July 2013, the word mark Anna Smith as a Community trade mark for Classes 18 and 25, as per the application.

Plea in law

Plea in law

| — | Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.

---
# C_2015228EN.01002201.xml

| 13.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 228/22 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

13.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 228/22

---

Action brought on 15 May 2015 — Łabowicz v. OHIM — Pure Fishing (NANO)

(Case T-237/15)

(2015/C 228/27)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: Edward Łabowicz (Kłodzko, Poland) (represented by: M. Żygadło, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Defendant:

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Pure Fishing, Inc. (Spirit Lake, United States)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal:

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue:

Trade mark at issue: Community figurative mark containing the word element ‘NANO’– Community trade mark No 6 649 818

Trade mark at issue:

Procedure before OHIM: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

Procedure before OHIM

Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of OHIM of 5 March 2015 in Case R 2426/2013-1

Contested decision

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the contested decision; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the contested decision;

| — | order OHIM to pay the costs. |
| --- | --- |

—

order OHIM to pay the costs.

Pleas in law

Pleas in law

| — | Misinterpretation and misapplication of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Misinterpretation and misapplication of Article 7(1)(b) and (c) of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Infringement of Articles 76 and 83 of Regulation No 207/2009; |
| --- | --- |

—

Infringement of Articles 76 and 83 of Regulation No 207/2009;

| — | Breach of Articles 6 and 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights concerning, respectively, the right to a fair trial and the prohibition of discrimination. |
| --- | --- |

—

Breach of Articles 6 and 14 of the European Convention on Human Rights concerning, respectively, the right to a fair trial and the prohibition of discrimination.

---
No. 62398.

#### Wool Distributing Corp. *v.*United States,

protest 307860-K (Boston).

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

It was stipulated that the landed net weight at the time of importation of the 190 bales of wool herein, entered for warehouse, was 66,083 pounds; that the landed net weight of the 50 bales withdrawn from warehouse for consumption duty paid was 16,395 pounds; that the landed net weight of the 140 bales transferred in bond was 49,688 pounds; and, further, that the said warehouse entry may be reliquidated on the basis of 66,083 pounds net weight, with allocation of 16,395 pounds to the 50 bales withdrawn for consumption duty paid and 49,688 pounds to the 140 bales covered by said transfer entry. The protest was sustained accordingly.
Exhibit 99.01


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Annual Report of Montgomery Realty Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the period ending September 30, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
I, Dinesh Maniar Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the
Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge
and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.




/s/ Dinesh Maniar
------------------------------
Dinesh Maniar
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
November 13, 2002
No. 57599.

#### Dreyfus Ashby & Co., Inc., et al. *v.*United States,

protests 203337-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

At the trial it was stipulated that the issues and facts herein are similar in all material respects to those involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the quantities reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, were not in fact received by the importers. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited it was held that duty and internal revenue tax are not assessable upon such portions of the merchandise as were reported by the inspector as manifested, not found.
Exhibit 31.1 I, Dennis Rushovich, certify that:1. I have reviewed this Form 10-KSB of Hartville Group, Inc.;2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material factor omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of thecircumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periodcovered by this report;3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information includedin this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results ofoperations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the period presented in this report;4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing andmaintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:     (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controlsand procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relatingto the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others withinthose entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;     (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and proceduresand presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls andprocedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and     (c) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control overfinancial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter that hasmaterially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internalcontrol over financial reporting; and5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recentevaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the auditcommittee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):     (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect theregistrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and     (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees whohave a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.    Dated: March 30, 2006       /s/ Dennis Rushovich     Dennis Rushovich, CEO
```

[Congressional Bills 115th Congress]
[From the U.S. Government Publishing Office]
[H. Res. 811 Engrossed in House (EH)]

<DOC>
H. Res. 811

                In the House of Representatives, U. S.,

                                                        April 11, 2018.
    Resolved, That upon adoption of this resolution it shall be in order to 
consider in the House the bill (H.R. 4790) to amend the Volcker rule to give the 
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System sole rulemaking authority, to 
exclude community banks from the requirements of the Volcker rule, and for other 
purposes. All points of order against consideration of the bill are waived. In 
lieu of the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee 
on Financial Services now printed in the bill, an amendment in the nature of a 
substitute consisting of the text of Rules Committee Print 115-67 shall be 
considered as adopted. The bill, as amended, shall be considered as read. All 
points of order against provisions in the bill, as amended, are waived. The 
previous question shall be considered as ordered on the bill, as amended, and on 
any further amendment thereto, to final passage without intervening motion 
except: (1) one hour of debate equally divided and controlled by the chair and 
ranking minority member of the Committee on Financial Services; and (2) one 
motion to recommit with or without instructions.
    Sec. 2.  (a) It shall be in order at any time on the legislative day of 
April 12, 2018, for the Speaker to entertain motions that the House suspend the 
rules, as though under clause 1 of rule XV, relating to the joint resolution 
(H.J. Res. 2) proposing a balanced budget amendment to the Constitution of the 
United States. Debate on such a motion shall be extended to four hours. (b) The 
Chair may postpone further consideration of a motion considered pursuant to 
subsection (a) to such time as may be designated by the Speaker.
            Attest:

                                                                          Clerk.
```
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report of Dorato Resources Inc. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended January 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Anton J. Drescher, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that:



1)

The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and



2)

The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.





By:

/s/Anton J. Drescher



Anton J. Drescher,

Chief Executive Officer



May 23, 2007