alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
---

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350 AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TOSECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Alternet Systems, Inc.
  (the "Company") on Form 10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2005 as filed
  with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"),
  each of the undersigned, in the capacities and on the dates indicated below,
  hereby certifies pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
  Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to their knowledge:

| | 1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of
      Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
  and                                  
| | -- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| |    |                                                                                                                                                                
| | 2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents,
      in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation
      of the Company.

|Dated: January 3, 2007 | By: | /s/
      Patrick Fitzsimmons
|---------------------- | --- | -----------------------------
|                       |     | Patrick Fitzsimmons          
|                       |     | President and Director       

---
Document

Exhibit 10.24


AMENDMENT NUMBER 1 


TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT


AS OF JANUARY 26, 2021


THIS AMENDMENT NUMBER 1 (“Amendment”) to the EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT (the “Employment Agreement”) is made and entered into as of January 26, 2021, by and between the Company and the Executive.  Capitalized terms used in this Amendment without definition have the meaning given to such terms in the Employment Agreement.
RECITALS


WHEREAS, this Amendment is an amendment to the Employment Agreement made and entered into on October 23, 2018; and


WHEREAS, in 2021, the Company is transitioning to a new, overlapping three-year Performance Plan (“Performance Plan” or “PP”) with payouts, if any, following closure of each performance period.


NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the respective covenants and agreements hereinafter set forth, and intending to be legally bound, the parties hereto agree as follows:


SECTION 4.b.(2) of the Employment Agreement is amended as follows (with changes in bold and red text):


PSP/PP.  In the PSP at an opportunity equal to 300% of Base Salary if targets are reached at 100%, or such greater percentage if provided in the PSP for any measurement period.  The applicable percentage for Executive’s current 2018-2020 PSP award shall be prorated, with this increased percentage effective as of January 1, 2019.  Effective January 1, 2021, the Company is transitioning to a Performance Plan, with overlapping three-year, all cash performance periods, with cash payouts, if any, following as soon as practical following the closing of the performance period.  As a result of this change, Executive will participate in the PP at an opportunity equal to 100% of Base Salary if targets are reached at 100%.  Installment payments and participation in the prior 2018-2020 PSP cycle are governed by their separate plan documents and the Employment Agreement. 
 
Except as expressly amended hereby, the Employment Agreement remains in full force and effect.


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Amendment to the Employment Agreement as of the day and year first written above.


						
	EXECUTIVE


By: /s/ Aldo Pichelli


	TELEDYNE TECHNOLOGIES INCORPORATED


By: /s/ Charles Crocker
Chair, Personnel and Compensation Committee





						
	By: /s/ Aldo Pichelli


	By: /s/ Charles Crocker
Chair, Personnel and Compensation Committee
Before the Second Division,

December 23, 1943

No. 49060.

#### Protests 104775-K, etc., of O. B. & R. Lazrus (New York).

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

The record conclusively showed that certain of the articles in question consist of unadjusted watch movements more than 1 inch wide but less than 1.77 inches wide, having 15 jewels, and that certain other articles consist of unadjusted watch movements more than 1 inch wide but less than 1.77 inches wide, having 17 jewels. In accordance therewith all of the merchandise in question was held dutiable at 90 cents each plus 9 cents for each jewel therein in excess of 7 jewels under said paragraph as modified.
No. 52163.

protest 133306-K (New York).

#### Curacao Trading Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

From an examination of the papers the court was unable to find any evidence sufficient to overcome the action of the collector, which was presumptively correct. The protest was therefore overruled.
No. 63562.

protests 305178-K, etc. (New York).

#### Frederick H. Cone & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Ford, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of synthetic filaments similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Empire Brushes, Inc., et al.*v. *United States*(42 Cust. Ct. 145, C.D. 2078), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
IA

106TH CONGRESS

1ST SESSION H. J. RES. 15

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United States with

respect to the terms of Senators and Representatives.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

JANUARY 6, 1999

Mr. MCCOLLUM (for himself, Mr. GRAHAM, Mr. BILBRAY, Mr. POMBO, Mr.

FOLEY, Mr. HANSEN, Mr. CAMPBELL, Mr. BARTLETT of Maryland, and

Mr. SMITH of Michigan) introduced the following joint resolution; which

was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

JOINT RESOLUTION

Proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the United

States with respect to the terms of Senators and Representatives.

1 Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives

2 of the United States of America in Congress assembled

3 (two-thirds of each House concurring therein), That the fol4 lowing article is proposed as an amendment to the Con5 stitution of the United States, which shall be valid to all

6 intents and purposes as part of the Constitution when

7 ratified by the legislatures of three-fourths of the several

8 States within seven years after the date of its submission

9 for ratification:
2

•HJ 15 IH

1 ‘‘ARTICLE—

2 ‘‘SECTION 1. The term of office of a Representative

3 in Congress shall be four years and shall coincide with

4 the term of the President of the United States.

5 ‘‘SECTION 2. No person who has been elected for a

6 full term to the Senate two times shall be eligible for elec7 tion or appointment to the Senate. No person who has

8 been elected for a full term to the House of Representa9 tives three times shall be eligible for election to the House

10 of Representatives.

11 ‘‘SECTION 3. No person who has served as a Senator

12 for more than three years of a term shall subsequently

13 be eligible for election to the Senate more than once. No

14 person who has served as a Representative for more than

15 two years shall subsequently be eligible for election to the

16 House of Representatives more than two times.

17 ‘‘SECTION 4. No election or service occurring before

18 this article becomes operative shall be taken into account

19 when determining eligibility for election under this article.

20 ‘‘SECTION 5. No Member of one House of Congress

21 may, except in the final year of that Member’s current

22 term, qualify under applicable State law as a candidate

23 for the other House of Congress, unless that Member has

24 resigned from the House in which that Member currently

25 serves.
3

•HJ 15 IH

1 ‘‘SECTION 6. This article shall apply with respect to

2 terms of office of Representatives and Senators beginning

3 after the first day of the year immediately following the

4 first presidential election after ratification of this article.’’.

Æ
UNPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 07-6094

LLOYD EUGENE BROWN, Plaintiff - Appellant, versus JOSE A. SERANNO; REX BLOCKER; RICHARD FRICKEY; LOUSIA ROSARIO; GARY FAVOUR, Nurse; UNITED STATES ATTORNEY FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA; ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES, Defendants - Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge. (2:05-cv-03342-RBH) Submitted: June 29, 2007 Decided: September 4, 2007 Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Lloyd Eugene Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.- 2 - PER CURIAM: Lloyd Eugene Brown appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. Seranno , No. 2:05-cv-03342-RBH (D.S.C. filed Nov. 30, 2006 & entered Dec. 1, 2006). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED
<PAGE>
                                                                   EXHIBIT 32.1


                CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

         I, Scott D. Dorfman, Chief Executive Officer of Innotrac Corporation
(the "Company"), certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 as adopted by ss.906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

(1)      the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended
         June 30, 2003 (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of
         Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of
         the Company.


Dated: August 14, 2003

                                        /s/ Scott D. Dorfman
                                        ---------------------------------------
                                        Scott D. Dorfman
                                        President, Chief Executive Officer and
                                        Chairman of the Board
Swanson, Brian (OST) Xxn'-QSV- ZOOO-(^•^f-3 

From: rafael torres [messicanoyque@msn.com] 

Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 3:06 AM 

To: Devany, Dennis (OST) 

'ii^i'MEMTOF 

'ORWiOH 

cc: EAS (OST) '-i-Ei OPERA!iCN; 

Subject: Answer to Pacific Wings' Petition for Reconsideration 

JAN ?5 [-' h 28 

To whom this may concern 

Im writing to you regarding the petition for reconsideration requested by Pacific Wings. The 

enormous price increase from Pacific wings has made it very difficult for many people here in 

Kalaupapa to get basic necessities. 

With Makani Kai only serving Kalaupapa for this short period of time you can see a difference in 

our community. A sigh of relief has come over the community knowing that basic medical, food 

and family needs can be accommodated without a 500 dollar price tag. 

Rafael Torres
<PAGE>



                                                                            99.3

                       OAKWOOD ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, LLC
                     SERVICER'S ANNUAL COMPLIANCE STATEMENT

                        OAKWOOD MORTGAGE INVESTORS, INC.
                  SENIOR/SUBORDINATED PASS-THROUGH CERTIFICATES
                                  SERIES 2000-C

Pursuant to Section 3.13(a) of the Standard Terms to Pooling and Servicing
Agreement (May 1999 Edition) which is incorporated in the Pooling and Servicing
Agreement dated September 2000 among Oakwood Mortgage Investors, Inc., Oakwood
Acceptance Corporation (the "Servicer") and Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, N.A.,
the undersigned officer of the Servicer hereby certifies that a review of the
activities of the Servicer during the period October 1, 2000 through September
30, 2001 and of its performance under the Pooling and Servicing Agreement has
been made under his supervision and to the best of his knowledge, based on such
review, the Servicer has fulfilled all its obligations under the Pooling and
Servicing Agreement through such period.



By: /s/ Derek M Surette
------------------------

Name: Derek M Surette
---------------------

Title: Vice President /Controller
---------------------------------

Date:  September 30, 2001
-------------------------
MERANZE AND KATZ, P.C. 

BY: Michael N. Katz, Esquire (ID# 27857) 

 Claiborne S. Newlin, Esquire (ID# 84371) 

Lewis Tower Building, 12th Floor 

225 S. 15th Street 

Philadelphia, PA 19102 

Tel.: (215) 546-4183 

Fax: (215) 790-1382 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

BRICKLAYERS AND ALLIED CRAFTWORKERS : 

LOCAL 1 OF PA/DE et al. : CIVIL ACTION 

 : 

 Plaintiffs, : NO. 02CV-4079 

 v. : 

 : 

MASTRO MASONRY CONTRACTORS et al. : 

 : 

 Defendants : 

 :

ORDER TO SETTLE, DISCONTINUE AND END 

LIMITED TO DEFENDANTS ERNEST BOCK AND SONS, INC. 

AND XL SPECIALTY INSURANCE CO. ONLY

To the Clerk: 

Please mark this action settled, discontinued and ended with respect to Defendants Ernest 

Bock and Sons, Inc. and XL Specialty Insurance Co. only. 

Date: ________________ ________________________ 

 CLAIBORNE S. NEWLIN 

 Attorney for Plaintiffs 

Case 2:02-cv-04079-JKG Document 27 Filed 02/23/2004 Page 1 of 1
State of New York

Supreme Court, Appellate Division

Third Judicial Department

Decided and Entered: May 19, 2016 518815 

________________________________

THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF

NEW YORK,

Respondent,

v MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

YGORD BELIARD,

Appellant.

________________________________

Calendar Date: April 26, 2016

Before: Peters, P.J., Lahtinen, Egan Jr., Devine and Mulvey, JJ.

__________

Eric K. Schillinger, East Greenbush, for appellant.

Joel E. Abelove, District Attorney, Troy (Vincent J.

O'Neill of counsel), for respondent.

__________

Devine, J.

Appeal from an order of the County Court of Rensselaer

County (Ceresia, J.), entered February 20, 2014, which classified

defendant as a risk level II sex offender pursuant to the Sex

Offender Registration Act.

Following a jury trial, defendant was convicted of rape in

the second degree, attempted sodomy in the second degree and

endangering the welfare of a child. In anticipation of his

release from prison, the Board of Examiners of Sex Offenders

prepared a risk assessment instrument presumptively classifying

defendant as a risk level II sex offender (105 points) and

recommended against a departure. Following hearings, County

Court adopted the Board's risk level scoring and classified him

as a risk level II sex offender. Defendant now appeals.
-2- 518815 

Defendant's sole contention on appeal is that County Court

should have ordered a hearing as to defendant's competence to

participate in the risk assessment hearing pursuant to CPL

730.30. Assuming without deciding that a court's duty to order a

competency hearing is applicable to risk level determinations

pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration Act (but see CPL 730.30

[1]), we find no abuse of discretion in County Court's failure to

order such a hearing here. No hearing was requested and,

although defendant was uncooperative, argumentative and evasive

in his responses to County Court's questions during the hearings,

he denied ever being treated for any mental illness or condition

and his behavior did not raise a reasonable belief that he was

unable to understand the proceedings or assist in the

determination of his risk assessment level as to require a

competency hearing (see People v Yu-Jen Chang, 92 AD3d 1132,

1134-1135 [2012]; People v Hood, 35 AD3d 1138, 1138 [2006], lv

denied 8 NY3d 808 [2007]; see also United States v Neal, 776 F3d

645, 658-659 [9th Cir 2015]).

Peters, P.J., Lahtinen, Egan Jr. and Mulvey, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, without costs.

ENTER:

Robert D. Mayberger

Clerk of the Court
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent *

except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

The Honorable Ronald S.W. Lew, Senior United States District Judge **

for the Central District of California, sitting by designation.

The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision ***

without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

 FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

 Plaintiff - Appellee,

 v.

CHAD ANDREW BERKLEY,

 Defendant - Appellant.

No. 12-10140

D.C. No. 4:11-cr-02884-DCB

MEMORANDUM*

Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Arizona

Ronald S.W. Lew, District Judge, Presiding** 

Submitted October 15, 2013*** 

Before: FISHER, GOULD, and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

Chad Andrew Berkley appeals from the district court’s judgment and

challenges his guilty-plea conviction for failure to register as a sex offender, in

FILED

OCT 21 2013

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
2 12-10140

violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2250(a). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291,

and we affirm.

Berkley argues that the registration requirements of the Sex Offender

Registration and Notification Act (“SORNA”) did not apply to him when he

moved from Pennsylvania to Arizona in 2010, because the Attorney General’s

SMART guidelines, which made the requirements retroactive as of August 1, 2008,

did not comply with the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”). Berkley’s claim

is foreclosed by our decision in United States v. Valverde, 628 F.3d 1159, 1164,

1169 (9th Cir. 2010), in which we held that the final SMART guidelines issued on

July 2, 2008, complied with the APA’s procedural requirements and that SORNA

became effective against offenders like Berkley, who were convicted before the

statute’s enactment, on August 1, 2008. See United States v. Mattix, 694 F.3d

1082, 1084-85 (9th Cir. 2012) (per curiam), cert. denied, 2013 WL 2417739 (U.S.

Oct. 7, 2013).

AFFIRMED.
S02Y1735.

#### IN THE MATTER OF ALAN AUSTIN GAVEL.

(569 SE2d 840)

Per Curiam.

This disciplinary matter is before the Court on Alan Austin Gavel’s Notice of Compliance and Petition for Reinstatement. On September 14, 1998, this Court accepted Gavel’s petition for voluntary discipline and imposed a suspension from the practice of law for *495a period of 36 months from the date of the order, see *In the Matter of Gavel,*269 Ga. 758 (507 SE2d 423) (1998). The Court also placed certain conditions on Gavel before it would issue an order reinstating him to practice, including that he take the Georgia Multi-State Professional Responsibility Examination (“MPRE”), and receive a passing grade on the exam no earlier than three years following the date of the Court’s order; that after obtaining certification of his passage of the MPRE, he obtain certification from the Office of the General Counsel (“OGC”) that based on a review of its records there was no indication that subsequent to the acceptance of his voluntary petition he had engaged in any conduct making him a danger to his clients or the public; that he file a request for reinstatement with the Review Panel showing his compliance with all the requirements for readmission and that the OGC file the State Bar’s response to his request; and, after reviewing the record, that the Review Panel file a report and recommendation with this Court on his request for reinstatement. In his petition for readmission, Gavel shows that he has met the conditions for reinstatement set forth in *Gavel,*supra. The State Bar has no objections to his request for readmission, and the Review Panel finds that Gavel has complied with all the conditions precedent to reinstatement and recommends the Court enter an order allowing Gavel’s readmission to practice while requiring, as set forth in this Court’s previous order in *Gavel,*supra, that Gavel submit to quarterly audits of his attorney trust accounts by the Law Practice Management Section of the State Bar (“LPMS”) for the first 12 months after returning to active status, that he pay all charges and expenses required by the LPMS to conduct such audits, and that the LPMS notify the OGC whether he has submitted to the audits and paid the charges and expenses.

Decided September 16, 2002.

*William P. Smith III, General Counsel State Bar, E. Duane Cooper, Assistant General Counsel State Bar,*for State Bar of Georgia.

It appears that Gavel has met the procedural and legal requirements to be readmitted to the State Bar of Georgia. This Court hereby adopts the recommendation of the Review Panel and approves Gavel’s petition for reinstatement. We therefore order that Gavel be reinstated as an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of Georgia.

*Petition for reinstatement accepted.*

*All the Justices concur.*
EXHIBIT 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350

In connection with the Annual Report of ATEL Capital Equipment Fund IX, LLC, (the Company) on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2007 as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Dean L. Cash, President and Chief Executive Officer of ATEL Financial Services, LLC, Managing Member of the Company, hereby certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:



|1. | The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|-- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------



|2. | The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|-- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: March 27, 2008



|                                              
|----------------------------------------------
|                                              
|/s/ Dean L. Cash                              
|Dean L. Cash                                  
|President and Chief Executive Officer of      
|ATEL Financial Services, LLC (Managing Member)

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to the Company and will
be retained by the Company and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.