alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CRS-13J-2.1 CRS Dispute Request Form Page 1 of 1 

U. S. Department of the Treasury

Bureau of the Fiscal Service

Centralized Receivables Service (CRS)

CRS Dispute Form 

If you object to the invoice you received, your dispute must be made in writing, signed, and delivered as indicated 

below. Supporting documentation is strongly encouraged as your objection(s) will be considered based on the 

information you provide with this form. Submitting this dispute form will NOT halt interest and penalty assessment (if 

applicable) on your invoice(s). This dispute submission will halt referral of the invoice to Treasury’s Cross-Servicing 

program, but only until a dispute decision is mailed to you. 

Instructions: 

1) Complete Requestor Information: placean X next to the section(s) that fit your dispute, and include a detailed 

explanation of your dispute. ALL FIELDS REQUIRED.

2) Sign and date the form.

3) Submit this form and any attachments by fax or mail to:

Fax: 217-789-0071; Mail: CRS Servicing PO Box 19296 Springfield IL 62794-9296

Select a Dispute Reason

1. Existence of the receivable described in the invoice

I do not owe this receivable(Proof contained in documentation provided).

2. I already paid the invoice in full

Proof contained in documentation provided (Ex. Check, bank statement, tracking #). 

3. Amount of the invoice

I do not owe the full amount on invoice (Ex. partially paid or disputing invoiced amount).

4. The validity of the invoice is in question due to an identity issue

I have provided proof that this bill does not belong to me (Ex. wrong identity, Jr./Sr.).

Explanation of Dispute

Provide as much information on your request as possible. We strongly encourage you to supply supporting

documentation.

Privacy Act Statement: Collection of this information is authorized by 5 U.S.C. § 552a, 26 U.S.C. §§ 6331 and 6402, 31 U.S.C. §§ 

3716, 3720A and 7701(c). This information will be used to identify your receivables (whether current or delinquent) submitted

to the Department of the Treasury’s Bureau of the Fiscal Service for collection by Federal and State agencies, and to identify 

payments made or due to you by Federal or State agencies. This information will be disclosed to persons as authorized by 

you. Additional disclosures of this information may be to Federal and State agencies collecting your debts or issuing 

payments to you. The purpose of the additional disclosures will be to verify the accuracy of the information provided to the 

Bureau of the Fiscal Service and to assist such agencies in collecting your debts. Where the taxpayer identification number is 

your Social Security Number, collection of this information is required by 31 U.S.C. § 7701(c). Failure to furnish the information 

requested, including your Social Security Number, may delay or prevent proper review and assessment of your request.

Signature: Date:

Requestor Information

Name: Invoice Number: Date:

Address: 

City, State, Zip:

Phone Number:
# C_2015302EN.01006301.xml

| 14.9.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 302/63 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.9.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 302/63

---

Action brought on 4 July 2015 — ADR Center v Commission

(Case T-364/15)

(2015/C 302/78)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Applicant: ADR Center Srl (Rome, Italy) (represented by: L. Tantalo, lawyer)

Applicant:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul the Commission decision C (2015) 3117 final of 4 May 2015, |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the Commission decision C (2015) 3117 final of 4 May 2015,

| — | alternatively, declare eligible all the costs found inadmissible by the Commission, |
| --- | --- |

—

alternatively, declare eligible all the costs found inadmissible by the Commission,

| — | order the defendants and any interveners to pay the applicant’s legal costs and expenses for this procedure in an amount to be determined equitably by the Court. |
| --- | --- |

—

order the defendants and any interveners to pay the applicant’s legal costs and expenses for this procedure in an amount to be determined equitably by the Court.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging that the contested decision should be annulled on the ground that the Commission lacks the competence to adopt a recovery order in contractual matters. |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging that the contested decision should be annulled on the ground that the Commission lacks the competence to adopt a recovery order in contractual matters.

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging that the contested decision should be annulled on the ground that the decision relies on errors of fact and assessment. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging that the contested decision should be annulled on the ground that the decision relies on errors of fact and assessment.

| 3. | Third plea in law, alleging that the contested decision should be annulled on the ground that the Commission misused its power. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Third plea in law, alleging that the contested decision should be annulled on the ground that the Commission misused its power.

| 4. | Fourth plea in law, alleging that the contested decision should be annulled on the ground that the Commission breached their obligation to state reasons. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Fourth plea in law, alleging that the contested decision should be annulled on the ground that the Commission breached their obligation to state reasons.

---
No. 49936.

#### Protest 3836-K of Kraft Phenix Cheese Corp. (Los Angeles).

Opinion by

Keefe, J.

It was stipulated and agreed that the merchandise is similar in all material respects to that the subject of Abstracts 36724 and 38185, which records were incorporated herein. In accordance with stipulation and following the decisions cited the court held that the collector should .compute the duty upon the basis of the net weight of the cheese as shown by the weigher, less 1 ounce per loaf for tare of foil or paper, or both. The protest was sustained to this extent.
502

ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIALS (per Appendix V, Section 2.1)

(a) Submittal letter from Governor/designee X

(b) Evidence of adoption X

(c) State/District legal authority to adopt X(dl) Copy of actual rule/plan X

(d2) Rule changes indicated by underline/cross-out X

(e) Proof that action met procedural requirements X

(f) Copy of public notice x(g) Certification that hearing fulfilled public notice X

(h) Public comments & agency response N/A

TECHNICAL SUPPORT (per Appendix V, Section 2.2)

(a) Regulated pollutants identified x

(b) Affected sources & attainment status identified X

(C) Rule/plan emissions impact N/A

(d) Attainment, PSD & other required demonstration N/A(e) Modeling support as appropriate N/A

(f) Reliance on continuous emission reductions N/A

(g) Evidence of limits & other needed requirements X

(i) Justification for deviation from EPA policy N/A

I OVERALL COMPLETENESS I

Notes:
4566 4694

ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIALS (per Appendix V, Section 2.1)

(a) Submittal letter from Governor/designee X X

(b) Evidence of adoption X X

(c) State/District legal authority to adopt x x

(dl) Copy of actual rule/plan X X(d2) Rule changes indicated by underline/cross-out N/A X(e) Proof that action met procedural requirements x x

(f) Copy of public notice x x(g) Certification that hearing fulfilled public notice X X

(h) Public comments & agency response X X

TECHNICAL SUPPORT (per Appendix V, Section 2.2)

(a) Regulated pollutants identified x x

(b) Affected sources & attainment status identified X X

(c) Rule/plan emissions impact X N/A

(d) Attainment, PSD & other required demonstration N/A N/A

(e) Modeling support as appropriate N/A N/A

(f) Reliance on continuous emission reductions x x

(g) Evidence of limits & other needed requirements X X

(i) Justification for deviation from EPA policy N/A N/A

( OVERALL COMPLETENESS C C

Notes:
[ 1133.1 1133.3ADMINISTRATIVE MATERIALS (per Appendix V, Section 21)

(a) Submittal letter from Governor/designee X X(b) Evidence of adoption X X

(c) State/District legal authority to adopt x x(dl) Copyof actual rule/plan X X

(d2) Rule changes indicated by underline/cross-out X N/A(e) Proof that action met procedural requirements X X

(f) Copy of public notice X X(g) Certification that hearing fulfilled public notice X X

(h) Public comments & agency response N/A N/A

TECHNICAL SUPPORT (per Appendix V, Section 2.2)

(a) Regulated pollutants identified X X(b) Affected sources & attainment status identified X X

(c) Rule/plan emissions impact x x

(d) Attainment, PSD & other required demonstration N/A N/A(e) Modeling support as appropriate N/A N/A

(f) Reliance on continuous emission reductions X X(g) Evidence of limits & other needed requirements X X

(i) Justification for deviation from EPA policy N/A N/A

OVERALL COMPLETENESS C C I -

Notes:
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 66-15 Filed 08/14/2009 Page 1 of 1
[Federal Register Volume 88, Number 215 (Wednesday, November 8, 2023)]
[Notices]
[Page 77096]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2023-24677]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

FEDERAL MARITIME COMMISSION


Notice of Agreements Filed

    The Commission hereby gives notice of filing of the following 
agreements under the Shipping Act of 1984. Interested parties may 
submit comments, relevant information, or documents regarding the 
agreements to the Secretary by email at <a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#3665535544534257444f76505b5518515940"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="2774424455425346555e67414a4409404851">[email protected]</span></a>, or by mail, 
Federal Maritime Commission, 800 North Capitol Street, Washington, DC 
20573. Comments will be most helpful to the Commission if received 
within 12 days of the date this notice appears in the Federal Register, 
and the Commission requests that comments be submitted within 7 days on 
agreements that request expedited review. Copies of agreements are 
available through the Commission's website (www.fmc.gov) or by 
contacting the Office of Agreements at (202) 523-5793 or 
<a href="/cdn-cgi/l/email-protection#1e6a6c7f7a7b7f707f72676d776d5e78737d30797168"><span class="__cf_email__" data-cfemail="7602041712131718171a0f051f0536101b1558111900">[email protected]</span></a>.
    Agreement No.: 201175-007.
    Agreement Name: Port of NY/NJ Sustainable Services Agreement.
    Parties: APM Terminals Elizabeth, LLC; Port Liberty Bayonne LLC; 
Maher Terminals LLC; Port Liberty New York LLC; Port Newark Container 
Terminal LLC; Red Hook Container Terminal, LLC.
    Filing Party: Carol Lambos; The Lambos Firm LLP.
    Synopsis: The Amendment reflects the name changes of member 
companies GCT Bayonne LP and GCT New York LP to Port Liberty Bayonne 
LLC and Port Liberty LLC respectively.
    Proposed Effective Date: 10/27/2023.
    Location: https://www2.fmc.gov/FMC.Agreements.Web/Public/AgreementHistory/8136.

    Dated: November 3, 2023.
Carl Savoy,
Federal Register Alternate Liaison Officer.
[FR Doc. 2023-24677 Filed 11-7-23; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730-02-P


</pre><script data-cfasync="false" src="/cdn-cgi/scripts/5c5dd728/cloudflare-static/email-decode.min.js"></script></body>
</html>
Exhibit
32





Certification
of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer


18 U.S.C.
Section 1350


as
Adopted Pursuant to


Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002





The
undersigned, the Principal Executive Officer (President) and the Principal
Financial Officer (CFO) of GLOBAL BIOTECH CORP. (the "Company"), hereby
certifies that to his knowledge on the date hereof:





(a)
            The
      Annual Report on Form 10-K of the Company for the year ended November 30,
      2009, filed on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission
      (the "Report") fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15
      (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and


(b)
            Information
      contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
      financial condition and results of operations of the
    Company.





Date:
February 25,2010





/s/
      Louis GrecoLouis
      Greco,President(Principal
      Executive
Officer)





/S/Perry
      ChoinierePerry
      ChoiniereChief
      Financial Officer





This
certification accompanies the Report pursuant to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
and shall not, except to the extent required by such Act, be deemed filed by the
Company for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

_________________________________________

)

STANFORD GLABERSON, et. al., )

) Civil Action No. 03-6604(JP)

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) The Honorable John R. Padova

)

COMCAST CORPORATION, et. al., )

)

Defendants. )

_________________________________________ )

COMCAST’S MOTION TO EXCLUDE THE TESTIMONY

AND OPINIONS CONTAINED IN THE CLASS

RE-CERTIFICATION REPORT OF DR. JAMES T. MCCLAVE

Defendants Comcast Corporation, Comcast Holdings Corporation, Comcast Cable

Communications, Inc., Comcast Cable Communications Holdings, Inc., and Comcast Cable

Holdings, LLC (collectively “Comcast”) move, pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 702, to

exclude the proffered testimony and opinions of Plaintiff’s expert, Dr. McClave, as set forth in

the Class Re-Certification Report of Dr. James T. McClave, dated August 19, 2013. The

grounds for this Motion are set forth in the accompanying Memorandum of Law.

Dated: January 15, 2014 _ /s/ M. Norman Goldberger_

M. Norman Goldberger

BALLARD SPAHR LLP

1735 Market Street, 51st Floor

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103

Telephone: (215) 665-8500

Facsimile: (215) 864-8999

Christopher B. Hockett

Arthur J. Burke

Dana M. Seshens

David B. Toscano

DAVIS POLK & WARDWELL LLP

450 Lexington Avenue

New York, New York 10017

Case 2:03-cv-06604-JP Document 577 Filed 01/15/14 Page 1 of 2
Telephone: (212) 450-4000

Facsimile: (212) 701-5800

Sheron Korpus

Alycia R. Benenati

KASOWITZ, BENSON, TORRES &

FRIEDMAN LLP

1633 Broadway

New York, New York 10019

Telephone: (212) 506-1700

Facsimile: (212) 506-1800

Attorneys for Defendants Comcast Corporation,

Comcast Holdings Corporation, Comcast Cable

Communications, Inc., Comcast Cable

Communications Holdings, Inc., and Comcast

Cable Holdings, LLC

Case 2:03-cv-06604-JP Document 577 Filed 01/15/14 Page 2 of 2
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

CLARA and TONY RUFFALO, :

: CIVIL ACTION NO. 02-CV-4112

Plaintiffs, :

:

v. :

:

BAYER CORPORATION;

BAYER AG;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE, PLC;

GLAXOSMITHKLINE;

SMITHKLINE BEECHAM

:

:

:

:

:

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

:

Defendants. :

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE

To the Clerk of the Court:

Kindly enter the appearances of Hope S. Freiwald, Aline Fairweather, Erin

Brennan and Kirstin J. Miller as attorneys for defendant SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a

GlaxoSmithKline.

Respectfully Submitted,

_____________________________ _____________________________

Hope S. Freiwald Aline Fairweather

_____________________________ _____________________________

Erin Brennan Kirstin J. Miller

DECHERT PRICE & RHOADS

4000 Bell Atlantic Tower

1717 Arch Street

Philadelphia, PA 19103-2793

(215) 994-4000

Case 2:02-cv-04112-JD Document 8 Filed 10/04/2002 Page 1 of 1
Before the Second Division,

February 19, 1948

No. 52184.

protest 944805-G (New York).

#### Tucker & Goodheart *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Tilson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that certain items of the merchandise consist of hats composed of manila hemp, not blocked or trimmed, and not bleached, dyed, colored, or stained, similar in all material respects to those the classification of which was involved in *United States*v. *Armand Schwab*(30 C. C. P. A. 72, C. A. D. 218), the claim’ of the plaintiff was sustained.
Before the Third Division,

May 8, 1967

No. 60729.

#### Morganite, Inc. *v.*United States,

protests 290820-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of carbon powder similar in all material respects to that the subject of *Morganite, Inc.*v. *United States*(42 C. C. P. A. 207, C. A. D. 595), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit 99.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO 
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002



In connection with the Annual Report
of QI Systems Inc. (the Company) on Form 20-F for the period ended July 31,
2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the
Report), I, Craig Jones, Acting Principal Financial Officer of the Company,
certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

| | (1)       
               The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the
               Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
| | --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | (2)       
               The information contained in this Report fairly presents, in all material
               respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
| | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

| | /s/ Craig Jones
Acting Interim Principal Financial Officer
February 3, 2003
| | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
No. 62431.

#### Darlington Pearl Works *v.*United States,

protests 280605-K and 291341-K (New York).

Opinion by

Donlon, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of mother-of-pearl disks similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Paramount Import Export Co. et al.*v. *United States*(45 C. C. P. A. 82, C. A. D. 677), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

ROBERT McDEVITT : CIVIL ACTION

Plaintiff, :

:

vs. : NO. 03-5386

:

JO ANNE B. BARNHART :

Commissioner of SOCIAL SECURITY :

ADMINISTRATION :

 :

O R D E R

 AND NOW, this 21 day of June, 2005, upon consideration of the pleadings and the st

record herein, and after review of the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate

Judge Charles B. Smith dated February 24, 2005, no objections having been filed, IT IS

ORDERED as follows:

 1. The Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Charles B. Smith

dated February 24, 2005, is APPROVED and ADOPTED;

 2. The Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of

Social Security, is DENIED; 

 3. Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED;

 4. The Final Decision of Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security, denying

plaintiff’s Disability Insurance Benefits under Title II of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 

§ 401, et seq., is REVERSED; and,

 5. The matter is REMANDED to Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social

Security, for calculation of benefits.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Honorable Jan E. DuBois

 JAN E. DUBOIS, J.

Case 2:03-cv-05386-JD Document 17 Filed 06/22/05 Page 1 of 1
Exhibit 32.1





CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO


18 U.S.C.
SECTION 1350,


AS
ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In connection with this Annual Report
on Form 10-K/A of Convera Corporation (the "Company") for the period ended
January 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the
date hereof (the "Report"), I, Patrick C. Condo, President and Chief Executive
Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:





(1)
            The
      Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of
      the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and





(2)
            The
      information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
      respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
      Company.








By: /s/ Patrick C.
Condo


Patrick
C. Condo


President
and Chief Executive Officer


June 1,
2009
Scorecard Objectives Measures Score Score Justification 

1 Referral of Debtors With a TIN Percentage of cases referred with a TIN2 Completeness of Debt Information Referred via Batch Notation of the number of referred and posted transactions and percenta

transactions that posted successfully 

3 Responsiveness to Dispute Requests Percentage of dispute requests that received a timely response

4 Responsiveness to Proof of Debt Requests Percentage of proof of dispute requests that received a timely response5 Administrative Wage Garnishment6 Credit Bureau Reporting7 Private Collection Agency8 Referrals to DOJ9 Full Compromise Authority

10 Treasury Offset Program (via Cross-Servicing)

11 Salary Offset In Progress DMS is working with agencies to implement salary offsets for debts refer

TOP through Cross Servicing. 

12 Cross Servicing (Meets 180 day Mandate) Percentage of required number of delinquent debt referred 

13 TOP (Meets 120 day Mandate) Percentage of required number of delinquent debt referred 

OMB Circular A-129/CNC/Close-Out 14 Meets Write-Off and Close-Out Requirements Compliant Review Required Debts reported for > 2 years meets/did not meet the requirement

Scoring Keys:

AGY referred a total of # debts and $ this quarter. When compared to the previous quarter, the total number of referrals de/increased by X% and the total dollar amount referred de/increased Y%; would also name bureau/progra

AGY incorrectly reported debts in the "Other Category" on it's current quarter TROR. The corresponding correction will be reflected on the next quarter TROR. 

Debt Management Services

 Agency Assessment Scorecard

Agency Name: Chief Financial Officer: Deputy Chief Financial Officer: 

Debt/Debtor Information

(Cross-Servicing) 

Fully Compliant 

Approaching Fully Compliant 

Above Average

Average 

Review Required

Collection Tool Use

(Cross-Servicing) 

Treasury Report on Receivables (TROR) 

Reporting Accuracy, Timeliness, and 

Frequency of Referrals 

*The scores for measures 13 and 14 cannot be compared to the previous quarter because the parameters for "Above Average", "Average", and "Review Required" are recalculated every quarter.

Comparison of the number of eligible programs using the tool and the totanumber of programs; parenthetical notation of a corresponding percentag

Excellent

Good

Fair 

Review Required

N/A

Excellent

Good

Fair

Review Required

N/A

Debt Management Services

U.S. Department of the Treasury - Bureau of the Fiscal Service
# DEEE Pain Point Catalog

# image1.png