alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
CERTIFICATIONS



I, Stephen Pearce, certify that:

1.

I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Golden Goliath Resources Ltd.;

2.

Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3.

Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4.

The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

a)

designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b)

evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

c)

disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and

5.

The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a)

all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b)

any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  March 14, 2008

|                                        |  |                    
|--------------------------------------- |  | -------------------
|By:                                     |  | /s/  Stephen Pearce
|                                        |  |                    
|Stephen Pearce,
Chief Financial Officer
<PAGE>

                         HOME LOAN FINANCIAL CORPORATION
                                  EXHIBIT 99.1

                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Home Loan Financial Corporation (the
"Corporation") on Form 10-QSB for the period ended September 30, 2002, as filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date of this Certification
(the "Report"), I, Robert C. Hamilton, the President of the Company, certify,
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

         1. The Report complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d)
         of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         2. The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
         material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of
         the Corporation.




                           /s/ Robert C. Hamilton
                           -----------------------------------
                           Robert C. Hamilton, President

                           Date:  November 7, 2002









--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


                                                                             27.
Exhibit 31.02

                                  CERTIFICATION

         I, Sixto Alcantara, certify that:

         1. I have reviewed this Form 10-QSB of Montgomery Realty Group, Inc.;

         2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue
statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make
the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements
were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

         3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the small business
issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

         4. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures
(as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the small
business issuer and have:

         (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such
disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to
ensure that material information relating to the small business issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being
prepared;

         (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the small business issuer's
disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions
about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

         (c) disclosed in this report any change in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the small
business issuer's most recent fiscal quarter (the small business issuer's fourth
fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or
is reasonably likely to materially affect, the small business issuer's internal
control over financial reporting; and

         5. The small business issuer's other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the small business issuer's auditors and the audit
committee of the small business issuer's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent functions):

         (a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design
or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably
likely to adversely affect the small business issuer's ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and

         (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or
other employees who have a significant role in the small business issuer's
internal control over financial reporting.

Date: May 14, 2004

/s/ Sixto Alcantara
----------------------------
Sixto Alcantara
Principal Financial Officer
Exhibit 12.2
CERTIFICATIONS
I, Annie S. Veerman, Chief Financial Officer of Lucite International GroupHoldings Limited, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this annual report on Form 20-F of Lucite InternationalGroup Holdings Limited; 2. Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untruestatement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary tomake the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which suchstatements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered bythis annual report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financialinformation included in this annual report, fairly present in all materialrespects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows ofthe registrant, as of, and for, the periods presented in this annualreport; 4. The Registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible forestablishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (asdefined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrantand we have:      (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures,or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to bedesigned under our supervision, to ensure that materialinformation relating to the registrant, including itsconsolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by otherswithin those entities, particularly during the period in whichthis annual report is being prepared;      (b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’sdisclosure controls and procedures and presented in thisannual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of thedisclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the periodcovered by this annual report based on such evaluation; and      (c) disclosed in this annual report any change in theregistrant’s internal control over financial reporting thatoccurred during the period covered by the annual report thathas materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materiallyaffect, the registrant’s internal control over financialreporting.
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based onour most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting,to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’sboard of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):      (a) all significant deficiencies and materialweaknesses in the design or operation of internal control overfinancial reporting which are reasonably likely to adverselyaffect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summariseand report financial information; and      (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involvesmanagement or other employees who have a significant role inthe registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
**Date: April 1,2004**
/s/Annie S. Veerman
Annie S. Veerman
Document

Exhibit 10.27
Executive Officer Benefits – February 2021


Financial Counseling Services
Unisys pays for financial counseling services, including investment planning, estate planning and/or tax preparation up to an annual fixed amount as noted below. Participants may elect to pay a qualified licensed provider defined as a CPA, Certified Financial Planner, or Estate Planner of their choice directly (other than the outside auditor’s employed by Unisys – currently PwC and Participant family members). Amounts paid on the officer’s behalf are treated as imputed income. 




						
	

Executive Officer Group
	

Annual Maximum

	CEO	$7,500

	President and COO	$6,500

	All other Executive Officers	$5,000







Annual Physical Examination
Executive Physicals will first be processed through the Participants’ Unisys Medical plan; or, if the Officer is covered under a medical plan outside of Unisys, that plan. Unisys will reimburse Participants up to a $7,000 maximum to cover any difference between the amount paid by Unisys’ medical plan or other coverage and the cost of the physical.  


Executive Death Benefit
Executive officers appointed prior to February 2015 are provided a death benefit under the Executive Death Benefit Only Program (EDBOP).  In the event that death occurs during active employment, the officer’s beneficiary will receive a death benefit in an amount equal to 4 times annual base salary plus target EVC award.  The program provides a post-retirement death benefit in an amount equal to 2.5 times base salary in effect at the time of retirement.  


Unisys Corporation generally purchases life insurance in order to fund payment to the beneficiary under the EDBOP.  Since the benefit is paid directly from Unisys to the beneficiary and is therefore considered taxable income, Unisys will gross up the benefit to cover any income and employment taxes due.


Spousal Travel
Unisys recognizes that Participants may, at times, travel to events where spouses are expected to attend.  In this situation, additional costs for travel, lodging, meals or other travel expenses for spouses must be preapproved by the CHRO and will be reimbursed provided the Participant has a bona fide company purpose for engaging in the travel or attending the event.  Such travel should occur infrequently and must be in compliance with this policy.
No. 55797.

protests 165113-K, etc. (New York).

#### Atalo Creations et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion -by

Lawrence, J.

The protests were dismissed.
Federal Housing Finance Agency 

Anne Marie Pippin – Deputy Director 

Division of Conservatorship Oversight and Readiness (DCOR) 

Anne Marie Pippin is the Deputy Director of the Division of Conservatorship 

Oversight and Readiness (DCOR).

Ms. Pippin has over 13 years of public sector experience in mortgage finance, 

innovation, risk management and controls, and corporate governance. She joined 

FHFA in 2017 and most recently served as Associate Director of the Office of 

Governance and Strategic Initiatives and Office of Financial Technology in 

DCOR. In this role she was responsible for leading and coordinating Agency

efforts to understand technology-driven developments in housing finance, addressing emerging risks and 

advancing Agency priorities related to the responsible adoption and deployment of financial technology, 

as well as overseeing governance and strategic initiatives related to the conservatorship of the Enterprises 

(Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac).

Previously in FHFA, she served as Governance Branch Manager and as an Examiner within the Division 

of Enterprise Regulation with broad coverage of governance topics, including corporate governance, 

model governance, artificial intelligence and machine learning risk management, and enterprise-wide risk 

management. She co-wrote the FHFA Advisory Bulletin 2022-02, Artificial Intelligence and Machine 

Learning Risk Management, and wrote the FHFA Advisory Bulletin 2020-06, Enterprise Risk 

Management Program. 

Prior to joining FHFA, Ms. Pippin served in various risk management and governance functions in the 

Department of Energy, Department of Defense, Department of the Interior, and National Oceanic and 

Atmospheric Administration. Ms. Pippin also served as an analyst on climate risk at the White House 

Council on Environmental Quality in 2012. Ms. Pippin is a graduate of the University of Georgia, where 

she holds a Juris Doctor (JD), Master of Business Administration (MBA), and undergraduate business 

degree.
Department of the Treasury 

Bureau of the Fiscal Service 

CROSS SERVICING DEBTOR DISPUTE FORM 

Please complete the form below, attaching any supporting documentation. 

Fax form and attachments to 855-415-4999.

Name:

Address:

Social Security Number:

FedDebt Number:

Comments:

You may also mail the form to: 

U.S. Department of the Treasury 

Debt Management Services 

P O Box 830794 

Birmingham, AL 35283-0794 

Privacy Act Statement: Collection of this information is authorized by 5 U.S.C. § 552a, 26 U.S.C. §§ 6331 and 

6402, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3716, 3720A and 7701(c). This information will be used to identify your receivables 

(whether current or delinquent) submitted to the Department of the Treasury’s Bureau of the Fiscal Service for 

collection by Federal and State agencies, and to identify payments made or due to you by Federal or State 

agencies. This information will be disclosed to persons as authorized by you. Additional disclosures of this 

information may be to Federal and State agencies collecting your debts or issuing payments to you. The 

purpose of the additional disclosures will be to verify the accuracy of the information provided to the Bureau of 

the Fiscal Service and to assist such agencies in collecting your debts. Where the taxpayer identification 

number is your Social Security Number, collection of this information is required by 31 U.S.C. § 7701(c). 

Failure to furnish the information requested, including your Social Security Number, may delay or prevent 

proper review and assessment of your request.
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 56 Filed 05/19/09 Page 1 of 13
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 56 Filed 05/19/09 Page 2 of 13
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 56 Filed 05/19/09 Page 3 of 13
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 56 Filed 05/19/09 Page 4 of 13
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 56 Filed 05/19/09 Page 5 of 13
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 56 Filed 05/19/09 Page 6 of 13
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 56 Filed 05/19/09 Page 7 of 13
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 56 Filed 05/19/09 Page 8 of 13
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 56 Filed 05/19/09 Page 9 of 13
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 56 Filed 05/19/09 Page 10 of 13
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 56 Filed 05/19/09 Page 11 of 13
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 56 Filed 05/19/09 Page 12 of 13
Case 2:03-cv-04822-RBS Document 56 Filed 05/19/09 Page 13 of 13
### -78 -77 -76 -75 39 40 

## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲



## ★ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ 

### 500 1000 1500 100 18 12 06 00 09/05 

## NOAA HYSPLIT MODEL 

# Backward trajectory ending at 2300 UTC 05 Sep 07

EDAS Meteorological DataSource★at 39.44 N 77.04 WMeters AGL 

## ★ ■ ■ ■ 

## ★ ■ ■ ■ ■



## ★ ● ● ● 

## ★ ● ● ● ●
```

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 231 (Friday, November 30, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 71400-71401]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-28979]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMITTEE FOR PURCHASE FROM PEOPLE WHO ARE BLIND OR SEVERELY DISABLED

Procurement List Proposed Additions

AGENCY: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled.

[[Page 71401]]

ACTION: Proposed Additions to the Procurement List.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Committee is proposing to add services to the Procurement 
List that will be provided by nonprofit agencies employing persons who 
are blind or have other severe disabilities.
    Comments Must be Received on Or Before: 12/31/2012.

ADDRESSES: Committee for Purchase From People Who Are Blind or Severely 
Disabled, Jefferson Plaza 2, Suite 10800, 1421 Jefferson Davis Highway, 
Arlington, Virginia 22202-3259.
    For Further Information or To Submit Comments Contact: Barry S. 
Lineback, Telephone: (703) 603-7740, Fax: (703) 603-0655, or email 
CMTEFedReg@AbilityOne.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:  This notice is published pursuant to 41 
U.S.C. 8503(a)(2) and 41 CFR 51-2.3. Its purpose is to provide 
interested persons an opportunity to submit comments on the proposed 
actions.

Additions

    If the Committee approves the proposed additions, the entities of 
the Federal Government identified in this notice will be required to 
provide the services listed below from nonprofit agencies employing 
persons who are blind or have other severe disabilities.
    The following services are proposed for addition to the Procurement 
List for production by the nonprofit agencies listed:

Services

Service Type/Location: E911 Dispatch Service, Directorate of Emergency 
Services (DES) Emergency Call Center, & Military Police Station, 6940 
Marchant Street, Building 216, Fort Benning, GA.
NPA: Bobby Dodd Institute, Inc., Atlanta, GA
Contracting Activity: DEPT OF THE ARMY, W6QM MICC-FT BENNING, FT 
BENNING, GA.

Service Type/Locations: Hospital Housekeeping Service; McDonald Army 
Health Center, Fort Eustis, VA; Health/Dental Clinic, Fort Story, VA; 
Veterinary Clinic, Fort Story, VA.
NPA: Enterprise Professional Services, Inc., Austin, TX.
Contracting Activity: W40M USA MEDCOM Health Care Acquisition Agency, 
Center for Health Care Contracting, Fort Sam Houston, TX.

Barry S. Lineback,
Director, Business Operations.
[FR Doc. 2012-28979 Filed 11-29-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6353-01-P
```
1

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF IDAHO

Docket Nos. 46405/46406

STATE OF IDAHO,

Plaintiff-Respondent,

v.

CARL EDWARD IVINS,

Defendant-Appellant.

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

Filed: May 16, 2019

Karel A. Lehrman, Clerk

THIS IS AN UNPUBLISHED

OPINION AND SHALL NOT

BE CITED AS AUTHORITY

Appeal from the District Court of the First Judicial District, State of Idaho, 

Kootenai County. Hon. Scott Wayman, District Judge. 

Judgments of conviction and concurrent unified sentences of nine years with two 

years determinate for burglary, affirmed; orders denying Idaho Criminal Rule 35 

motions for reduction of sentences, affirmed.

Eric D. Fredericksen, State Appellate Public Defender; Sally J. Cooley, Deputy 

Appellate Public Defender, Boise, for appellant. 

Hon. Lawrence G. Wasden, Attorney General; Kenneth K. Jorgensen, Deputy 

Attorney General, Boise, for respondent. 

________________________________________________

Before GRATTON, Chief Judge; HUSKEY, Judge;

and BRAILSFORD, Judge

________________________________________________

PER CURIAM

In each of these cases, consolidated on appeal, Carl Edward Ivins pled guilty to burglary, 

Idaho Code § 18-1401. In exchange for his guilty pleas, additional charges were dismissed. The 

district court imposed a concurrent unified sentence of nine years with two years determinate in 

each case, to run concurrently. Ivins filed Idaho Criminal Rule 35 motions for reduction of his 

sentences, which the district court denied. Ivins appeals.

Sentencing is a matter for the trial court’s discretion. Both our standard of review and the 

factors to be considered in evaluating the reasonableness of the sentence are well established. 
2

See State v. Hernandez, 121 Idaho 114, 117-18, 822 P.2d 1011, 1014-15 (Ct. App. 1991); State 

v. Lopez, 106 Idaho 447, 449-51, 680 P.2d 869, 871-73 (Ct. App. 1984); State v. Toohill, 103 

Idaho 565, 568, 650 P.2d 707, 710 (Ct. App. 1982). When reviewing the length of a sentence, 

we consider the defendant’s entire sentence. State v. Oliver, 144 Idaho 722, 726, 170 P.3d 387, 

391 (2007). Applying these standards, and having reviewed the record in this case, we cannot 

say that the district court abused its discretion.

Next, we review whether the district court erred in denying Ivins’ Rule 35 motions. A 

motion for reduction of sentence under Rule 35 is essentially a plea for leniency, addressed to the 

sound discretion of the court. State v. Knighton, 143 Idaho 318, 319, 144 P.3d 23, 24 (2006); 

State v. Allbee, 115 Idaho 845, 846, 771 P.2d 66, 67 (Ct. App. 1989). In presenting a Rule 35 

motion, the defendant must show that the sentence is excessive in light of new or additional 

information subsequently provided to the district court in support of the motion. State v. 

Huffman, 144 Idaho 201, 203, 159 P.3d 838, 840 (2007). Upon review of the record, including 

any new information submitted with Ivins’ Rule 35 motions, we conclude no abuse of discretion 

has been shown.

Therefore, Ivins’ judgments of conviction and sentences, and the district court’s orders

denying Ivins’ Rule 35 motions, are affirmed.
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

GEORGE BACSKAI, et al

ANTHONY J. ROMAGNOLI, et al

 v. CIVIL CASE NO.: 03-5931 and

 03-6869 

BELL & HOWWELL

BELL & HOWELL

O R D E R

AND NOW, TO WIT: This 25th Day of JANUARY, 2005,

it having been reported that the issues between the parties in

the above actions have been settled and upon Order of the Court

pursuant to the provisions of Rule 41.1(b) of the Local Rules of

Civil Procedure of this Court (effective January 1, 1970), it is

ORDERED that the above actions are DISMISSED with

prejudice, pursuant to agreement of counsel without costs. The

Court intends to retain jurisdiction for one year from now, and

any settlement agreement is approved and made a part of the

record and this Order for enforcement purposes.

MICHAEL E. KUNZ, Clerk of Court

BY: 

Helen A. Nicholas 

 Deputy Clerk

Civ 2 (7/95) 

41.1(b)