alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
Exhibit 21.1

                                  Subsidiaries

<TABLE>
<CAPTION>
Name                                              Jurisdiction of Incorporation            Ownership
----                                              -----------------------------            ---------
<S>                                                  <C>                                <C>
Full Power Enterprise Global Limited                 British Virgin Islands             100% (Direct)

Shenzhen Yuzhilu Aviation Service Co.                           China                   100% (Indirect)

Shenzhen Speedy Dragon Enterprises Limited                      China                   100% (Indirect)

Xian Golden Net Travel Services                                 China                   100% (Indirect)

Lanbao Travel Service Co, Ltd.                                  China                   100% (Indirect)

Foshan International Travel Service Co. Ltd.                    China                   100% (Indirect)
</TABLE>
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, Respondent

v. MANUEL DEL ROSARIO GONZALEZ, Petitioner : : : : : : : : : : : No. 929 MAL 2014 Petition for Allowance of Appeal from the Order of the Superior Court

ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW , this 28th day of May, 2015, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED
.
Exhibit 23.1

                         Consent of Independent Auditors

We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form
S-8 No. 333-89214) pertaining to the Directors Stock Option Plan, Management
Stock Option Plan, and Key Employee Stock Option Plan and (Form S-8 No.
333-69342) pertaining to the IPO Leveraged Share Plan of INFICON Holding AG of
our report dated January 25, 2002, with respect to the consolidated financial
statements and schedule of INFICON Holding AG included in the Annual Report on
Form F-20 for the year ended December 31, 2003.


                                                /s/ Ernst & Young LLP

Buffalo, New York
March 25, 2003
#### DAVIS v. HUMPHREY.

No. 230.

United States District Court M. D. Pennsylvania.

Oct. 11, 1948.

George Robert Davis, pro se.

Arthur A. Maguire, U. S. Atty., of Scranton, Pa., and Charles W. Kalp, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Lewisburg, Pa., for respondent.

FOLLMER, District Judge.

Petitioner filed his application for writ of habeas corpus. He alleges that he was sentenced to a term of four years by the *514United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Southern Division, on January 29, 1945, under 18 U. S.C.A. § 761 on Counts Two, Four, Six and Eight of an indictment found against him in that District. No copy of the Indictment is attached to his petition. His contention is that he should have been sentenced under 18 U.S.C.A. § 76b,2 and that the possible maximum on the four counts under said section is $1,000. or two years, or both.

A rule to show cause issued and Respondent thereupon moved that this Court refuse to entertain the application pursuant to the provisions of Section 2255 of the new Federal Judicial Code, 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255.

Upon consideration thereof, 1 am of the opinion that this is clearly a case predicated upon an allegation that the sentence imposed was not authorized by law, and that a motion to the court which imposed the sentence is both adequate and effective to test the legality of his detention. All of the data, information and records pertinent to the question involved, are in that court.

The Rule to Show Cause is hereby vacated and a writ of habeas corpus is accordingly refused.

1

 In 1948 Revision, 18 U.S.C.A. § 912.

2

 In 1948 Revision, 18 U.S.C.A. § 701.
##### 



Exhibit 11.1 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC AUDITORS We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements of Vivendi Universal S.A.
(Vivendi Universal) listed below of our report dated April 8, 2004 (except with respect to matters discussed
in Note 32, as to which the date is June 30, 2004), with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Vivendi Universal
and subsidiaries as of and for the years ended respectively December 31, 2003 and 2002, which is included in
Vivendi Universals Annual Report on Form 20-F for the year ended December 31, 2003, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission: RegistrationSEC Form
    
    Filing Date
    
    NumberS-8
    
    
    08/11/2003
    
    
    
    333-107837S-8
    
    
    06/06/2002
    
    
    
    333-72270S-8
    
    
    06/04/2002
    
    
    
    333-89744S-8
    
    
    06/04/2002
    
    
    
    333-89754S-8
    
    
    05/06/2002
    
    
    
    333-87622S-8
    
    
    01/31/2002
    
    
    
    333-81830S-8
    
    
    10/26/2001
    
    
    
    333-72270S-8
    
    
    08/29/2001
    
    
    
    333-64754S-8
    
    
    01/04/2001
    
    
    
    333-48966S-8
    
    
    12/29/2000
    
    
    
    333-51654S-8
    
    
    12/11/2000
    
    
    
    333-51654S-8
    
    
    12/11/2000
    
    
    
    333-48966S-8
    
    
    10/05/2000
    
    
    
    333-47440F-3/A
    
    
    06/03/2002
    
    
    
    333-81578F-3
    
    
    01/29/2002
    
    
    
    333-81578
 Paris and Courbevoie, France
June 30, 2004 /s/ RSM Saulstro Reydel
    
    /s/ Barbier Frinault & CieRSM Saulstro Reydel
    
    Barbier Frinault & CieA member firm of Ernst & Young International
Case No. 13,688.

#### In re SWEET et al.

[9 N. B. R. 48; 21 Pittsb. Leg. J. 82.] 1

District Court, E. D. Michigan.

1874.

Bankruptcy — Assignee’s Account — Auctioneer’s Charges — Necessity for Services of Auctioneer.

The law contemplates that the assignee himself shall sell the property of the bankrupt. Where an auctioneer is employed the assignee-must show affirmatively the necessity for such employment, or the auctioneer’s charges will not be allowed him by the court in his final account.

*544On exceptions to assignee’s final account, filed by the register, Hovey K. Clarke, Esq.

1

 [Reprinted from 9 N. B. R. 48, by permission. 21 Pittsb. Leg. J. 82, contains only partial report.]

LONGYEAR, District Judge.

In regard to the employment of an auctioneer, I entirely agree with the learned judge of the Western district of Texas in Re Pegues [Case No. 10,907], where he says: “the law contemplates that the assignee shall himself sell the property of the estate. There may be cases in which it would be proper to employ an auctioneer, but the necessity for so doing should be first shown to the court, and leave obtained.” At all events, the as-signee having taken the responsibility upon himself to employ an auctioneer he must now make the necessity of such aid, and the reasonableness of the amount paid therefor, to appear, before he can have that charge allowed.
- Home
- Who We Are    - Organization
  - History
  - Policies & Planning
  - FGDC Secretariat
- What We Do  - ADVANCEMENT OF THE NSDI
- Geospatial Data Act
- Collaboration & Partnerships
- Develop Geospatial Shared Services    - Geospatial Platform
  - Cloud Computing
  - Geospatial Interoperability
- Manage Federal Geospatial Resources    - A-16 NGDA Portfolio Management
  - Geospatial Platform Marketplace
- Standards Development
- Geospatial Metadata
 
- Initiatives  - Current    - NSDI Strategic Plan 2021-2024
  - Geospatial Platform Shared Services
  - NGDA Management Plan
  - Open Water Data Initiative
  - National Address Database
  - GeoPathways
  - Disaster Risk Resilience
- Emerging Topics    - Geolocation Privacy
  - Crowdsourcing
  - Education & Workforce Development
  - New Geodetic Datums
- Past Activities    - Cooperative Agreements Program
  - Fifty States Initiative
  - Geospatial Line of Business
  - SmartBUY
 
- Organization    - Overview
  - Steering Committee
  - Executive Committee
  - National Geospatial Advisory Committee
  - Coordination Group
  - Working Groups
  - Subcommittees
  - FGDC Secretariat
  - Collaborating Partners
  - Membership Directory
- Resources    - Key Publications
  - Download Geospatial Standards
  - Policies & Planning
  - Lexicon of Geospatial Terminology
  - FGDC Geospatial Services Status Checker
  - News
  - Calendar
  - Media Resources

****

#                     List of 2003 NSDI CAP Projects                 

        -  Home 
        -  Grants 
        -  2003 CAP Grants 
        -  List of 2003 NSDI CAP Projects  

The 2003 program provided approximately $1,076,000 to 51organizations in five categories.
                - 2003 Project  Factsheet Version
                - Category Descriptions
                - Project Maps:  Interactive 

#### Contact Us

**Office:**
**Fax:**
**Email:**

##### **Subscribe** to Our Mailing List                            for Important News & Updates

**Subscribe

******Like                                    us**

******Follow                                    us**

******RSS**

Policies & NoticesUSA.gov Download Adobe Reader  Download Office Viewers
<TABLE> <S> <C>

<ARTICLE>                      9
<CIK>                         1050725
<NAME>                        ebank.com, Inc.

<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>               DEC-31-2000
<PERIOD-START>                  Jan-01-2000
<PERIOD-END>                    MAR-31-2000
<CASH>                          1,499,733
<INT-BEARING-DEPOSITS>          0
<FED-FUNDS-SOLD>                1,910,000
<TRADING-ASSETS>                0
<INVESTMENTS-HELD-FOR-SALE>     215,600
<INVESTMENTS-CARRYING>          0
<INVESTMENTS-MARKET>            0
<LOANS>                         51,109,854
<ALLOWANCE>                     (788,000)
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                  58,549,353
<DEPOSITS>                      48,996,850
<SHORT-TERM>                    0
<LIABILITIES-OTHER>             528,005
<LONG-TERM>                     0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>           0
<PREFERRED>                     0
<COMMON>                        14,402,697
<OTHER-SE>                      (5,378,199)
<TOTAL-LIABILITIES-AND-EQUITY>  58,549,353
<INTEREST-LOAN>                 1,234,887
<INTEREST-INVEST>               37,752
<INTEREST-OTHER>                0
<INTEREST-TOTAL>                1,272,639
<INTEREST-DEPOSIT>              579,727
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>              582,701
<INTEREST-INCOME-NET>           689,938
<LOAN-LOSSES>                   58,000
<SECURITIES-GAINS>              0
<EXPENSE-OTHER>                 2,240,983
<INCOME-PRETAX>                 (1,584,727)
<INCOME-PRE-EXTRAORDINARY>      (1,584,727)
<EXTRAORDINARY>                 0
<CHANGES>                       0
<NET-INCOME>                    (1,584,727)
<EPS-BASIC>                     (1.06)
<EPS-DILUTED>                   (1.06)
<YIELD-ACTUAL>                  5.39
<LOANS-NON>                     93,000
<LOANS-PAST>                    0
<LOANS-TROUBLED>                0
<LOANS-PROBLEM>                 0
<ALLOWANCE-OPEN>                730,000
<CHARGE-OFFS>                   0
<RECOVERIES>                    0
<ALLOWANCE-CLOSE>               788,000
<ALLOWANCE-DOMESTIC>            788,000
<ALLOWANCE-FOREIGN>             0
<ALLOWANCE-UNALLOCATED>         0


</TABLE>
No. 59414.

protest 232586-K (New York).

#### H. W. Robinson & Co., Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the issues are similar to those involved in Abstract 57104, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
No. 58877.

protest 241598-K (New York).

#### D. Hauser, Inc. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

The collector’s memorandum states that the entry was liquidated at the higher rate because the collector was not satisfied that the tomatoes were of Cuban origin; that a consular invoice showing Cuban origin was filed with the protest; but that the collector could not review the protest within the 90 days provided in section 515, Tariff Act of 1930, and could not grant the claim. The declaration of the shipper on the consular invoice states that the merchandise was the product of Cuba. These documents, however, were not offered or received in evidence herein. Following *W. T. Grant Company*v. *United States*(38 C. C. P. A. 57, C. A. D. 440), it was held that while the invoice is a part of the official papers in a protest case, it cannot be considered as proof of the matters contained therein unless it has been offered and received in evidence for that purpose. It was further held that other documents among the official papers must also be offered and received in evidence before they may be considered by the court in deciding a case. *(Swift & Company*v. *United States,*33 Cust. Ct. 212, C. D. 1655, and *United States*v. *Western Electric Company,*26 Cust. Ct. 531, Reap. Dec. 7954, cited.) The court was constrained, therefore, to overrule the protest.
Before the First Division,

May 22, 1963

No. 67734.

#### Zenith Novelty Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 60/30654, etc. (New York).

*307Opinion by

Oliver, C.J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of vinyl ornaments similar in all material respects to those the subject of Abstract 67011, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

BRAY MURRAY, :

 :

Petitioner, : CIVIL ACTION NO. 00-4903

 :

v. :

 :

PHILLIP JOHNSON; THE DISTRICT :

ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF :

PHILADELPHIA, LYNN ABRAHAM; :

and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL :

OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, :

MICHAEL FISHER, : 

 :

Respondents. :

ORDER

AND NOW, this 27th day of March, 2023, after considering the “Second Motion for 

Reconsideration of the Judgment Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 60(b)(6), Entered 09/28/2001, 

Dismissing Habeas Corpus Petition as Untimely” filed by the pro se petitioner, Bray Murray (Doc. 

No. 35); and for the reasons set forth in the separately filed memorandum opinion, it is hereby 

ORDERED as follows:

1. The clerk of court shall REOPEN this case;

2. The “Second Motion for Reconsideration of the Judgment Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. 

Proc. 60(b)(6), Entered 09/28/2001, Dismissing Habeas Corpus Petition as Untimely” (Doc. No. 

35) is DENIED;

3. A certificate of appealability SHALL NOT issue; and

4. The clerk of court shall MARK this case as CLOSED.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Edward G. Smith 

EDWARD G. SMITH, J.

Case 2:00-cv-04903-EGS Document 42 Filed 03/27/23 Page 1 of 1
**Exhibit 21**

Direct and Indirect Wholly-Owned Subsidiaries of Waste Industries USA, Inc.

Black Bear Disposal, LLC 

Douglasville Transfer, LLC 

Duplin County Disposal, LLC 

ECO Services, LLC 

ETC of Georgia, LLC 

Laurens County Landfill, LLC 

Old Kings Road Solid Waste, LLC 

Red Rock Disposal, LLC 

Reliable Trash Service, LLC 

S & S Enterprises of Mississippi, LLC 

Safeguard Landfill Management, LLC

Sampson County Disposal, LLC 

Shamrock Environmental Services,LLC 

TransWaste Services, LLC 

Van Buren County Landfill, LLC

WasteCo, LLC 

Waste Industries, LLC 

Waste Industries Atlanta, LLC 

Waste Industries LandCo, LLC 

Waste Industries of Mississippi, LLC 

Waste Industries of Tennessee, LLC

Waste Industries Property Co., LLC 

Waste Services of Decatur,LLC 

Waste Services of Memphis, LLC 

Waste Services ofTennessee, LLC
No. 66709.

#### J. M. Sutton Sons & Co. *v.*United States,

protest 61/16018 (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of wall plaques similar in all material respects to those the subject of *Ross Products, Inc.*v. *United States*(43 Cust. Ct. 74, C.D. 2106), the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.
Exhibit
      32.2





CERTIFICATION
      PURSUANT TO


18
      U.S.C.
      SECTION 1350,


AS
      ADOPTED PURSUANT TO


SECTION
      906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002








In
      connection with the Annual Report of Convera Corporation (the "Company") on
      Form
      10-K for the period ended January 31, 2006 as filed with the Securities and
      Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, John R. Polchin,
      Chief
      Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
      as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
      that:





|(1) | The
              Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d)
              of
              the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
|--- | ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------




|(2) | The
              information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material
              respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the
              Company.
|--- | ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------







By: /s/
      John Polchin


John
      R.
      Polchin


Chief
      Financial Officer


March
      30,
      2006
DMEAST #14892611 v1 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 

________________________________________ 

 ) 

CAROLINE BEHREND, et al., ) 

 ) 

 Plaintiffs, ) 

 ) 

 v. ) 

 ) 

 ) 

COMCAST CORPORATION, et. al., ) 

 ) 

 Defendants. ) 

_______________________________________ ) 

 Civil Action No. 03-6604 

 Honorable John R. Padova 

ENTRY OF APPEARANCE 

Kindly enter my appearance as co-counsel on behalf of Defendants Comcast Corporation, 

et al. in the above-referenced matter. 

/s/ Paul J. Koob 

Paul J. Koob 

koobp@ballardspahr.com 

BALLARD SPAHR LLP 

1735 Market Street, 51st Floor 

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103-7599 

Telephone: 215.665.8500 

Facsimile: 215.864.8999 

Co-Counsel for Comast Corp., et al. 

Case 2:03-cv-06604-JP Document 486 Filed 04/19/12 Page 1 of 2
DMEAST #14892611 v1

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

 The undersigned attorney certifies that, on this date, he caused to be served copies of the 

foregoing upon counsel of record by ECF filing. 

/s/ Paul J. Koob 

Paul J. Koob 

Case 2:03-cv-06604-JP Document 486 Filed 04/19/12 Page 2 of 2
National Geospatial Advisory Committee Membership

April 2023

Acting Designated Federal Officer: Josh Delmonico, Federal Geographic Data Committee

Alt. Designated Federal Officer: John Mahoney, Federal Geographic Data Committee

www.fgdc.gov/ngac

Mr. Gary Thompson, NGAC Chair

State of North Carolina

Ms. Maggie Cawley, NGAC Vice Chair

OpenStreetMap U.S.

Nadine Alameh, Ph.D.

Open Geospatial Consortium

Clio Andris, Ph.D.

Georgia Institute of Technology

Mr. Frank Avila

National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency

Mr. Chad Baker

California Department of Transportation

Mr. Byron Bluehorse

Sovereign Planning

Mr. Jack Dangermond

Esri

Ms. Lynn Dupont

New Orleans Regional Planning Commission

Mr. Bert Granberg

Wasatch Front Regional Council

Ms. Holli Howard

Google Maps

Leslie Jones, Ph.D.

State of Alaska

Mr. Tony LaVoi

National Oceanic and Atmospheric 

Administration

Mr. Ryan Mattke

University of Minnesota

Mr. Mark Meade

NV5 Geospatial

Mr. Curtis Pulford

City of Phoenix, AZ

Ms. Devaki Raj

CrowdAI

Siva Ravada, Ph.D.

Oracle Corporation

Ms. Breece Robertson

One Tree Planted

Vasit Sagan, Ph.D.

St. Louis University

Kathleen Stewart, Ph.D.

University of Maryland

Mr. Phil Thiel

Dewberry

Mr. Tim Trainor

Trainor Consultants
# L_2022204EN.01001701.xml

| 4.8.2022 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | L 204/17 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

4.8.2022

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

L 204/17

---

Corrigendum to Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1270 of 21 July 2022 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine

(
  Official Journal of the European Union L 193 of 21 July 2022
  )

On page 162, in entry number 1209 for Alexander Anatolievich MAKSIMTSEV, in the third column headed ‘Identifying information’:

for:

‘POB: Tokmak, Kirghiz SSR, former USSR (now Russian Federation)’,

read:

‘POB: Tokmak, Kirghiz SSR, former USSR (now Kyrgyzstan)’.

---
**Exhibit 99.1**

 

**CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C.SECTION 1350,**

**AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE**

**SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002**

 

Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and in connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-KSB of Foundation CapitalResources, Inc. (“Foundation Capital”) for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned, the Chief Executive Officer of FoundationCapital, certifies that: 

 

(1) The Report fullycomplies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 

 

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operationsof Foundation Capital.
Federal Housing Finance Agency

Constitution Center

400 7th Street, S.W. 

Washington, D.C. 20219 

Telephone: (202) 649-3800 

Facsimile: (202) 649-1071 

www.fhfa.gov 

FHLBank System at 100 Listening Session 

September 29, September 30, and October 4, 2022 | 12:30 – 4:30 p.m. MT 

FHFA is specifically interested in receiving feedback in six key areas: 

1. The FHLBanks’ general mission and purpose in a changing marketplace;

2. FHLBank organization, operational efficiency, and effectiveness; 

3. FHLBanks’ role in promoting affordable, sustainable, equitable, and resilient 

housing and community investment; 

4. Addressing the unique needs of rural and financially vulnerable communities; 

5. Member products, services, and collateral requirements; and 

6. Membership eligibility and requirements.
EXHIBIT 99.6

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the annual report of Enerplus Corporation (the "Corporation") on Form 40-F/A for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2013 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I, Robert J. Waters, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the
Corporation certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

/s/ ROBERT J. WATERS Robert J. Waters
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of
Enerplus Corporation


February 25,
2014

The foregoing certification shall not be deemed "filed" for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such
certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it
by reference.

---



QuickLinks