alea-institute/kl3m-data-sample-004-shuffled huggingface dataset:
# C_2015236EN.01004502.xml

| 20.7.2015 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 236/45 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

20.7.2015

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 236/45

---

Action brought on 18 May 2015 — ACDA and Others v Commission

(Case T-242/15)

(2015/C 236/61)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Parties

Applicants: Automobile Club des Avocats — ACDA (Paris, France); Organisation des Transporteurs Routiers Européens — OTRE (Bordeaux, France); Fédération française des motards en colère — FFMC (Paris); Fédération française de motocyclisme (Paris); and Union nationale des automobile clubs (Paris) (represented by: M. Lesage, lawyer)

Applicants:

Defendant: European Commission

Defendant:

Form of order sought

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:

| — | declare their action admissible; |
| --- | --- |

—

declare their action admissible;

| — | annul Commission Notice SA.38271 of 28 October 2014 on State Aid SA.2014/N 38271, linked to the Plan for Investment in Motorways in France, published on 20 February 2015 in the Official Journal of the European Union (OJEU). |
| --- | --- |

—

annul Commission Notice SA.38271 of 28 October 2014 on State Aid SA.2014/N 38271, linked to the Plan for Investment in Motorways in France, published on 20 February 2015 in the Official Journal of the European Union (OJEU).

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants rely on five pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging that the French motorway investment plan (‘MIP’) would have the effect of granting a benefit specifically to concession-holding companies operating motorways, with the assistance of public funds. |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging that the French motorway investment plan (‘MIP’) would have the effect of granting a benefit specifically to concession-holding companies operating motorways, with the assistance of public funds.

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging that the MIP would affect competition. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging that the MIP would affect competition.

| 3. | Third plea in law, alleging overcompensation for the expenditure incurred by concession-holding companies operating motorways, which is inconsistent with the task of general economic interest with which they are entrusted. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Third plea in law, alleging overcompensation for the expenditure incurred by concession-holding companies operating motorways, which is inconsistent with the task of general economic interest with which they are entrusted.

| 4. | Fourth plea in law, alleging a barrier to trade between the Member States. |
| --- | --- |

4.

Fourth plea in law, alleging a barrier to trade between the Member States.

| 5. | Fifth plea in law, alleging that the amendments made to the MIP without a new notification having been made to the Commission since Notice SA.38271 are unlawful. |
| --- | --- |

5.

Fifth plea in law, alleging that the amendments made to the MIP without a new notification having been made to the Commission since Notice SA.38271 are unlawful.

---
Case 2:04-cv-00938-JG Document 5 Filed 05/03/2004 Page 1 of 20

MARY DOE v. MATCH.COM, INC. et al Doc. 5

Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:04-cv-00938-JG Document 5 Filed 05/03/2004 Page 2 of 20
Case 2:04-cv-00938-JG Document 5 Filed 05/03/2004 Page 3 of 20
Case 2:04-cv-00938-JG Document 5 Filed 05/03/2004 Page 4 of 20
Case 2:04-cv-00938-JG Document 5 Filed 05/03/2004 Page 5 of 20
Case 2:04-cv-00938-JG Document 5 Filed 05/03/2004 Page 6 of 20
Case 2:04-cv-00938-JG Document 5 Filed 05/03/2004 Page 7 of 20
Case 2:04-cv-00938-JG Document 5 Filed 05/03/2004 Page 8 of 20
Case 2:04-cv-00938-JG Document 5 Filed 05/03/2004 Page 9 of 20
Case 2:04-cv-00938-JG Document 5 Filed 05/03/2004 Page 10 of 20
Case 2:04-cv-00938-JG Document 5 Filed 05/03/2004 Page 11 of 20
Case 2:04-cv-00938-JG Document 5 Filed 05/03/2004 Page 12 of 20
Case 2:04-cv-00938-JG Document 5 Filed 05/03/2004 Page 13 of 20
Case 2:04-cv-00938-JG Document 5 Filed 05/03/2004 Page 14 of 20
Case 2:04-cv-00938-JG Document 5 Filed 05/03/2004 Page 15 of 20
Case 2:04-cv-00938-JG Document 5 Filed 05/03/2004 Page 16 of 20
Case 2:04-cv-00938-JG Document 5 Filed 05/03/2004 Page 17 of 20
Case 2:04-cv-00938-JG Document 5 Filed 05/03/2004 Page 18 of 20
Case 2:04-cv-00938-JG Document 5 Filed 05/03/2004 Page 19 of 20
Case 2:04-cv-00938-JG Document 5 Filed 05/03/2004 Page 20 of 20
Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of PC Connection, Inc. (the Company) for the period ended June 30, 2007 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report),
the undersigned, Jack Ferguson, Executive Vice President, Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, that:

(1) the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company.

|                      |  |  |  |                                                                 
|--------------------- |  |  |  | ----------------------------------------------------------------
|                      |  | 
|Date: August 10, 2007 |  |  |  | /s/ Jack Ferguson                                               
|                      |  |  |  | Jack Ferguson                                                   
|                      |  |  |  | Executive Vice President, Treasurer, and Chief Financial Officer
EXHIBIT 32.01


                            CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                             18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
                             AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
                  SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002


In connection with the Quarterly Report of Montgomery Realty Group, Inc. (the
"Company") on Form 10-QSB for the quarter ended March 31, 2005, as filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), I,
Dinesh Maniar, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, that, to the best of my knowledge and belief:

         (1)      the Report fully complies with the requirements of Section
                  13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

         (2)      the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in
                  all material respects, the financial condition and result of
                  operations of the Company.


/s/ Dinesh Maniar
-----------------------
Dinesh Maniar
Chief Executive Officer
February 28, 2006

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other
document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signature that
appears in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement
has been provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and
furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Michigan Supreme Court

Lansing, Michigan

Marilyn Kelly,

 Chief Justice

Michael F. Cavanagh

Maura D. Corrigan

Robert P. Young, Jr.

Stephen J. Markman

Diane M. Hathaway

Alton Thomas Davis, Justices

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the 

foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. 

 _________________________________________ 

 Clerk

September 15, 2010 

p0908 

Order 

 

September 15, 2010 

140670 

CHRISTOPHER L. EVANS, 

Plaintiff-Appellant, 

v SC: 140670 

 COA: 288546 

Wayne CC: 08-109953-CZ 

GROSSE POINTE PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM, 

Defendant-Appellee. 

_________________________________________/ 

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the January 19, 2010 

judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is GRANTED.
Document

EXHIBIT 10.2

 Carlyle Global Credit Investment Management L.L.C.
One Vanderbilt Avenue, Suite 3400
New York, New York 10017


January 11, 2021
 
Linda Pace
Chair of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and President
TCG BDC II, Inc.
One Vanderbilt Avenue, Suite 3400
New York, New York 10017
 
							
		Re:	Amendment to Investment Advisory Agreement


 
Dear Ms. Pace:
 
Reference is hereby made to the Investment Advisory Agreement (the “Advisory Agreement”), dated as of June 26, 2017, by and between TCG BDC II, Inc. (the “Company”) and Carlyle Global Credit Investment Management L.L.C. (the “Adviser”).  Capitalized terms used but not defined herein shall have the meaning ascribed to them in the Advisory Agreement.
 
The Adviser hereby agrees that Section 3(a)(i) of the Advisory Agreement shall be amended and restated as follows:  “The Management Fee will be calculated at an annual rate of 1.25% of the Company’s average Capital Under Management (as defined below) at the end of the then-current quarter and the prior calendar quarter; provided, however, effective September 12, 2021, the Management Fee will be calculated at an annual rate of 1.00% of the Company’s average Capital Under Management at the end of the then-current quarter and the prior calendar quarter.”  Except as expressly amended hereby, the Advisory Agreement remains in full force and effect.


This letter agreement (the “Letter Agreement”) and the Advisory Agreement contain the entire agreement of the parties and supersede all prior agreements, understandings and arrangements with respect to the subject matter hereof and thereof.  This Letter Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York.  For so long as the Company is regulated as a business development company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Investment Company Act”), this Letter Agreement shall also be construed in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Investment Company Act and the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the “Advisers Act”), in each such case, to the extent the applicable laws of the State of New York or any of the provisions herein conflict with the provisions of the Investment Company Act or the Advisers Act, the Investment Company Act and the Advisers Act, as applicable, shall control.
 
This Letter Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, any one of which need not contain the signatures of more than one party, but all of such counterparts together shall constitute one agreement.  Facsimiles, e-mail transmission of .pdf signatures or other electronic copies of signatures shall be deemed to be originals.
 
[Signature Page Follows.]






4815-2023-7780 v.3







Sincerely yours,
 
						
	 	Carlyle Global Credit Investment Management L.L.C.


By:       _________________
Name:  Joshua Lefkowitz
Title:    Chief Legal Officer of Global Credit



ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED:


TCG BDC II, INC.


			
	By:       _________________
Name:   Linda Pace
Title:     CEO & President
No. 58858.

protest 228668-K (New York).

#### Associated Dry Goods Corp., Lord & Taylor Div. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

It was stipulated that the issue herein is similar in all material respects to that involved in *United States*v. *Browne Vintners Co., Inc.*(34 C. C. P. A. 112, C. A. D. 351) and that the one ease of silk scarves, No. 925, reported by the inspector as manifested, not found, was not in fact received by the importer. In accordance with stipulation of counsel and following the decision cited it was held that duty is not assessable upon such portions of the merchandise as were reported by the inspector as manifested, not found. The protest was sustained to this extent.
<TABLE> <S> <C>


<ARTICLE> 5
<MULTIPLIER> 1,000
<CURRENCY> U.S. DOLLARS
       
<S>                             <C>
<PERIOD-TYPE>                   3-MOS
<FISCAL-YEAR-END>                          MAY-31-1999
<PERIOD-START>                             JUN-01-1998
<PERIOD-END>                               AUG-31-1998
<EXCHANGE-RATE>                                      1
<CASH>                                         114,822
<SECURITIES>                                    16,157
<RECEIVABLES>                                   43,933
<ALLOWANCES>                                         0
<INVENTORY>                                     50,552
<CURRENT-ASSETS>                               235,160
<PP&E>                                          54,967
<DEPRECIATION>                                       0
<TOTAL-ASSETS>                                 316,300
<CURRENT-LIABILITIES>                           26,815
<BONDS>                                              0
<PREFERRED-MANDATORY>                                0
<PREFERRED>                                          0
<COMMON>                                             1
<OTHER-SE>                                     288,464
<TOTAL-LIABILITY-AND-EQUITY>                   316,300
<SALES>                                         35,771
<TOTAL-REVENUES>                                36,356
<CGS>                                           23,427
<TOTAL-COSTS>                                   39,836
<OTHER-EXPENSES>                               (1,812)
<LOSS-PROVISION>                                     0
<INTEREST-EXPENSE>                                   0
<INCOME-PRETAX>                                (1,668)
<INCOME-TAX>                                   (1,096)
<INCOME-CONTINUING>                                156
<DISCONTINUED>                                       0
<EXTRAORDINARY>                                      0
<CHANGES>                                            0
<NET-INCOME>                                       156
<EPS-PRIMARY>                                      .01
<EPS-DILUTED>                                      .01
        

</TABLE>
STEAM ELECTRIC

DUMMY REPLACEMENT PAGE

EPA-HQ-OW-2009-0819

DCN: SE05590A2
No. 52159.

protests 124062-K, etc. (Cleveland).

#### W. Stuart Smith et al. *v.*United States,

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

From an examination of the papers the court was unable to find any evidence sufficient to overcome the action of the collector, which was presumptively correct. The protests were therefore overruled.
Document

Exhibit 10.18(b)


Schedule identifying Non-Employee Directors 
of Park National Corporation covered by form 
of Split-Dollar Agreement,  made and 
  entered into effective as of December 28, 2007  


    The following directors of Park National Corporation (“Park”) are covered by Split-Dollar Agreements (the “Split-Dollar Agreements”) as identified below, which Split-Dollar Agreements are identical to the form of Split-Dollar Agreement, made and entered into effective as of December 28, 2007, filed as Exhibit 10.2(a) to Park’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated and filed on January 2, 2008 (File No. 1-13006):


									
	Name of Director	Subsidiary of Park which is a Party to
Split-Dollar Agreement
	Date of Split-
Dollar Agreement

			
	Donna M. Alvarado	The Park National Bank	December 28, 2007
	F. William Englefield IV	The Park National Bank	December 28, 2007
	Robert E. O’Neill	The Park National Bank	December 28, 2007
	Mark R. Ramser	The Park National Bank (as successor by merger to The First-Knox National Bank of Mount Vernon)	December 28, 2007
	Leon Zazworsky	The Park National Bank	December 28, 2007
```

[Federal Register Volume 78, Number 166 (Tuesday, August 27, 2013)]
[Notices]
[Page 52903]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2013-20755]

=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS

Agenda and Notice of Public Meeting of the New York Advisory 
Committee

    Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and 
regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission), and 
the Federal Advisory Committee Act (FACA), that a planning meeting of 
the New York Advisory Committee to the Commission will convene at 12:00 
p.m. (ET) on Friday, September 13, 2013, at the Law Offices of Sullivan 
and Cromwell, 535 Madison Avenue, New York, New York. The purpose of 
the meeting is for project planning.
    Members of the public are entitled to submit written comments. The 
comments must be received in the regional office by Monday, October 14, 
2013. Comments may be mailed to the Eastern Regional Office, U.S. 
Commission on Civil Rights, 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, Suite 1150, 
Washington, DC 20425, faxed to (202) 376-7548, or emailed to 
ero@usccr.gov. Persons who desire additional information may contact 
the Eastern Regional Office at 202-376-7533.
    Persons needing accessibility services should contact the Eastern 
Regional Office at least 10 working days before the scheduled date of 
the meeting.
    Records generated from this meeting may be inspected and reproduced 
at the Eastern Regional Office, as they become available, both before 
and after the meeting. Persons interested in the work of this advisory 
committee are advised to go to the Commission's Web site, 
www.usccr.gov, or to contact the Eastern Regional Office at the above 
phone number, email or street address.
    The meetings will be conducted pursuant to the provisions of the 
rules and regulations of the Commission and FACA.

Agenda

I. Administrative Matters
    Update on HQ Activities
    Paperwork
II. Planning Meeting
    Review of SAC Project Proposals
    Decision on Projects
    Formation of Working Groups and Subcommittees
III. Next Steps and Assignments
    Project Timetable
    Next Meeting
IV. Adjournment

    Dated on August 21, 2013.
David Mussatt,
Acting Chief, Regional Programs Coordination Unit.
[FR Doc. 2013-20755 Filed 8-26-13; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6335-01-P
```
No. 60734.

#### Philip R. Bookbinder *v.*United States,

protest 281137-K (New York).

Opinion by

Johnson, J.

In accordance with rule 5 (b) of the rules of this court, as amended, the protest was dismissed for lack of prosecution.
Federal Depository Library ProgramPersistent URL Home Page      

# Target for /GPO/LPS4546 lost

The target resource for this PURL can no longer be traced. The following is a list of the targets this PURL was previously assigned to.

Powered by the Federal Depository Library Program.                A service of the U.S. Government Publishing Office.
<PAGE>

                                                                   EXHIBIT 99.1

                           CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
                 SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
       (SUBSECTIONS (a) AND (b) OF SECTION 1350, CHAPTER 63 OF TITLE 18,
                              UNITED STATES CODE)

   Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (Subsections (a)
and (b) of Section 1350, Chapter 63 of Title 18, United States Code) (the
"Act"), I, Joel V. Staff, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Reliant
Resources, Inc. (the "Company"), hereby certify, to the best of my knowledge:

      (a)  the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended
   December 31, 2002 (the "Report"), fully complies with the requirements of
   Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      (b)  the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
   material respects, the financial condition, results of operations and cash
   flows of the Company.

Date: April 30, 2003                    /S/  JOEL V. STAFF
                               ------------------------------------
                                          Joel V. Staff
                               Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

   The foregoing Certification is being furnished solely pursuant to Section
906 of the Act and is not being filed as part of the Report or as a separate
disclosure document.

   A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been
provided to the Company and will be retained by the Company and furnished to
the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
kK TT 4
\ \ OF eate central ops
4 Jt bank ra

william logan August 12, 1999
chairman of the board

Cynthia L. Johnson, Director
Cash Management Service
Room 420, 401 14th Street SW
Washington, D. C. 20227

Dear Ms. Johnson:

The Treasury Tax and Loan Account was set up originally to expedite
funds to the U. S. Treasury by using local depositories. Individuals
and businesses throughout the country may use the private investment
made by banks and bankers to facilitate their payments to the Treasury.
Banks and bankers make no charge to the Treasury Department for

this service and originally it was a sense of duty that created this
relationship.

The .25% less than Fed Funds paid at the present time should be reviewed
and increase this discount due to inflation, cost of investments, etc.

The assumption made that this is some type of overnight secured lending is
completely wrong. This is a service provided to the U. S. Treasury De-
partment by banks, and we certainly would not continue to provide it if
there is less of a discount, and we would strenuously lobby for the item
fees that will more than make up for the .25% discount from Fed Funds
now received.

rs very truly,

wl:fgh

601 main street * keokuk, iowa 52632 ° 319-524-1021 * ww.statecentralbank.com
Exhibit 11

 Code of Ethics for Principal Executive Officer and Senior Financial Officers

The principal executive officer and senior financial officers and others
responsible for the preparation, evaluation and dissemination of financial
information hold an important and elevated role in corporate governance.
Therefore, INFICON expects that such personnel foster a culture of transparency,
integrity and honesty, and to ensure that everyone in the organization also
fully complies with this Code.

To the best of their knowledge and ability, such personnel shall:

      1.    Act with honesty and integrity, ethically handling actual and
            apparent conflicts of interest in personal and professional
            relationships.

      2.    Provide full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure
            in reports and documents that INFICON files with, or submits to, the
            SWX Swiss Exchange, the United States Securities and Exchange
            Commission and in public communications made by INFICON.

      3.    Comply with applicable laws, rules and regulations of federal,
            state, provincial and local governments, and other appropriate
            private and public regulatory agencies.

      4.    Promptly report any evidence of a violation of these principles to
            the Audit Committee of INFICON's Board of Directors to (address
            TBD). Calls, detailed notes and/or emails will be dealt with
            confidentially.

Any violation of this Code will be subject to appropriate discipline, up to and
including dismissal from the Company and prosecution under the law. The Board of
Directors shall have the sole and absolute discretionary authority to approve
any deviation or waiver from this Code of Ethics. Any change in or waiver of
this Code of Ethics shall be promptly disclosed through a filing with the United
States Securities and Exchange Commission.
No. 52868.

#### The Nippon Co. et al. *v.*United States,

protests 563906-G, etc. (San Francisco).

Opinion by

Cole, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as the durikono passed upon in Abstract 52550, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.
No. 62446.

#### Imperial International Corp. *v.*United States,

protests 321968-K, etc. (New York).

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

The protests were dismissed.