# C_2016098EN.01004601.xml

| 14.3.2016 | EN | Official Journal of the European Union | C 98/46 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |

14.3.2016

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 98/46

---

Appeal brought on 18 December 2015 by DI against the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 15 October 2015 in Case F-113/13 DI v EASO

(Case T-730/15 P)

(2016/C 098/61)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Parties

Appellant: DI (Bucharest, Romania) (represented by: I. Vlaic and G. Iliescu, lawyers)

Appellant:

Other party to the proceedings: European Asylum Support Office (EASO)

Other party to the proceedings

Form of order sought by the appellant

Form of order sought by the appellant

The appellant claims that the Court should:

| — | annul in its entirety the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 15 October 2015 in case F-113/13; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul in its entirety the order of the Civil Service Tribunal of 15 October 2015 in case F-113/13;

| — | admit the current appeal; |
| --- | --- |

—

admit the current appeal;

| — | annul the EASO decision to dismiss the appellant, and consequently to oblige EASO to annul all legal effects of the said decision and to re-do the factual status accordingly; |
| --- | --- |

—

annul the EASO decision to dismiss the appellant, and consequently to oblige EASO to annul all legal effects of the said decision and to re-do the factual status accordingly;

| — | oblige the EASO to pay the appellant the amount of EUR 90 000 as material damages, and the amount of EUR 500 000 as moral damages; and |
| --- | --- |

—

oblige the EASO to pay the appellant the amount of EUR 90 000 as material damages, and the amount of EUR 500 000 as moral damages; and

| — | oblige EASO to pay all costs of the appellant related to the legal representation in front of the Civil Service Tribunal concerning the case F-113/13, and related to the present appeal. |
| --- | --- |

—

oblige EASO to pay all costs of the appellant related to the legal representation in front of the Civil Service Tribunal concerning the case F-113/13, and related to the present appeal.

Pleas in law and main arguments

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the appeal, the appellant relies on three pleas in law.

| 1. | First plea in law, alleging that the application of the appellant was admissible and grounded as it respects the correspondence between the pleas, reasons and facts mentioned within the complaint sent during the administrative procedure and the ones presented in detail to the Civil Service Tribunal. |
| --- | --- |

1.

First plea in law, alleging that the application of the appellant was admissible and grounded as it respects the correspondence between the pleas, reasons and facts mentioned within the complaint sent during the administrative procedure and the ones presented in detail to the Civil Service Tribunal.

| 2. | Second plea in law, alleging a breach of the principle for access for a fair trial and lack of fair analysis in the pre-litigation phase. The complaint of the appellant during the administrative procedure was rejected by the same person who initially decided to dismiss the appellant. |
| --- | --- |

2.

Second plea in law, alleging a breach of the principle for access for a fair trial and lack of fair analysis in the pre-litigation phase. The complaint of the appellant during the administrative procedure was rejected by the same person who initially decided to dismiss the appellant.

| 3. | Third plea in law, alleging a breach of the equal treatment principle by the Civil Service Tribunal. |
| --- | --- |

3.

Third plea in law, alleging a breach of the equal treatment principle by the Civil Service Tribunal.

---