### IN THE UNI TED STAT ES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIF TH CIRCU IT

N o

. 1 0

- 1 0 6 6 4 S u m m a r y C a l e n d a r

B U R R E L L J O H N S O N , J R

. ,

P l a i n t i f f

- A p p e l l a n t

v

.

R O S I E M

. J A C K S O N ,

D e f e n d a n t

- A p p e l l e e

A p p e a l f

r o m t h e U n i t e d S t a t e s D i s t r i c t C o u r t f o r t h e N o r t h e r n D i s t r i c t o f T e x a s U S D C N o

. 3 : 1 0

- C V

- 7 9 0

B e f o r e H I G G I N B O T H A M , S M I T H a n d H A Y N E S
, C i r c u i t J u d g e s

. P E R C U R I A M : *

B u r r e l l J o h n s o n , J r

. , T e x a s p r i s o n e r # 2 4 3 1 9 5 , m o v e s t h i s c o u r t t o p r o c e e d
i n f o r m a p a u p e r i s ( I F P ) i n t h i s a p p e a l f r o m t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t ’ s d i s m i s s a l o f h i s
4 2 U

. S

. C

. § 1 9 8 3 c o m p l a i n t f o r f a i l u r e t o s t a t e a c l a i m u p o n w h i c h r e l i e f m a y b e

g r a n t e d

. T h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t d e n i e d h i s r e q u e s t t o p r o c e e d I F P o n a p p e a l
,

c e r t i f y i n g t h a t t h e a p p e a l w a s n o t t a k e n i n g o o d f a i t h

. J o h n s o n ’ s I F P m o t i o n i n

t h i s c o u r t i s a c h a l l e n g e t o t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t ’ s c e r t i f i c a t i o n t h a t h i s a p p e a l i s n o t

t a k e n i n g o o d f a i t h

. S e e B a u g h v

. T a y l o r , 1 1 7 F

. 3 d 1 9 7 , 2 0 2 ( 5 t h C i r

. 1 9 9 2 )

. U n i te d S ta te s C o u rt o f A p p ea l s

F i ft h C i rc u i t 

### F I L E D March 24 , 20 11
Lyle W . Cayce Clerk

Purs uant to 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 , the cour t has d ete rm ined t hat this op inion sho uld not * be publ ish ed and is not pr ece dent excep t unde r the lim ite d cir cum st ance s se t for th in 5 T H C I R

. R. 47.5 .4. Case: 10-10664 Document: 00511423014 Page: 1 Date Filed: 03/24/2011N o

. 1 0

- 1 0 6 6 4

A s J o h n s o n h a s n o t a d e q u a t e l y a d d r e s s e d t h e r e a s o n s f o r t h e d i s t r i c t

c o u r t ’ s c e r t i f

i c a t i o n d e c i s i o n , i t i s t h e s a m e a s i f h e h a d n o t c h a l l e n g e d t h a t
d e c i s i o n

. S e e B r i n k m a n n v

. D a l l a s C o u n t y D e p u t y S h e r i f

f A b n e r , 8 1 3 F

. 2 d 7 4 4 , 7 4 8 ( 5 t h C i r

. 1 9 8 7 ) ; B a u g h
, 1 1 7 F

. 3 d a t 2 0 2

. B e c a u s e J o h n s o n h a s n o t s h o w n

t h a t h e w i l l p r e s e n t a n y n o n f r i v o l o u s i s s u e o n a p p e a l
, h i s m o t i o n f o r l e a v e t o

p r o c e e d I F P i s d e n i e d a n d t h i s a p p e a l i s d i s m i s s e d a s f r i v o l o u s

. S e e B a u g h
, 1 1 7
F

. 3 d a t 2 0 2 n

. 2 4 ; H o w a r d v

. K i n g , 7 0 7 F

. 2 d 2 1 5 , 2 2 0 ( 5 t h C i r

. 1 9 8 3 ) ; 5 T H C I R

. R

. 4 2

. 2

. T h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t ’ s d i s m i s s a l o f J o h n s o n ’ s § 1 9 8 3 c o m p l a i n t f o r f a i l u r e t o

s t a t e a c l a i m a n d o u r d i s m i s s a l o f t h i s a p p e a l a s f

r i v o l o u s b o t h c o u n t a s s t r i k e s
f o r p u r p o s e s o f 2 8 U

. S

. C

. § 1 9 1 5 ( g )

. S e e A d e p e g b a v

. H a m m o n s , 1 0 3 F

. 3 d 3 8 3 , 3 8 7

- 8 8 ( 5 t h C i r

. 1 9 9 6 )

. J o h n s o n i s c a u t i o n e d t h a t i f h e a c c u m u l a t e s t h r e e s t r i k e s

u n d e r § 1 9 1 5 ( g )
, h e w i l l n o t b e a b l e t o p r o c e e d I F P i n a n y c i v i l a c t i o n o r a p p e a l
f i l e d w h i l e h e i s i n c a r c e r a t e d o r d e t a i n e d i n a n y f a c i l i t y u n l e s s h e i s u n d e r
i m m i n e n t d a n g e r o f s e r i o u s p h y s i c a l i n j u r y

. S e e § 1 9 1 5 ( g )

. I F P M O T I O N D E N I E D ; A P P E A L D I S M I S S E D ; S A N C T I O N W A R N I N G

I S S U E D

.

2 Case: 10-10664 Document: 00511423014 Page: 2 Date Filed: 03/24/2011